Speaker 1: The show Today, we're going to talk about the two
Speaker 1: thousand pages of documents that The New York Times sued
Speaker 1: the Bureau of Prisons for. Specifically, we're going to discuss
Speaker 1: what was going on with Epstein around his final days,
Speaker 1: because this is something that obviously still has not been explained.
Speaker 1: Now you'll see some people try and section that's coming
Speaker 1: out that it points to Epstein killed himself, and that's
Speaker 1: fine and well if people want to believe that, that's cool.
Speaker 1: I'm not here to try to change anybody's mind, right,
Speaker 1: I just give you my opinion of what I think
Speaker 1: occurred and keep it moving. But still, with these documents,
Speaker 1: there's not enough there for me to say, ah, you
Speaker 1: know what, it's rather obvious that Epstein killed himself. No
Speaker 1: explanation of why he was in a sale with a
Speaker 1: cell with Nicholas Tartaglioni previously, no explanation about what happened
Speaker 1: in that cell with Nicholas. And furthermore, I've said it
Speaker 1: once and I'll stay it again. What kind of message
Speaker 1: was Tartaglione he's sending to Epstein in that prison cell.
Speaker 1: TARTAGLIONI should have never been in that cell with Epstein
Speaker 1: in the first place. Epstein was a high profile inmate.
Speaker 1: He should have been in the shoe. He should have
Speaker 1: been put away out of the spotlight, and it should
Speaker 1: have been taken care of with kid gloves. That's how
Speaker 1: important of an inmate he was. And it's not like
Speaker 1: his institution didn't have experience with high level inmates. Choppo
Speaker 1: was there. You know, a whole bunch of people were
Speaker 1: in this place. Now, don't get it twisted. The place
Speaker 1: as a shithole an absolute and the way it's managed
Speaker 1: is an absolute shit show as well. There is no
Speaker 1: denying that there were absolute moronic moves made by the staff.
Speaker 1: There is no doubt that there was negligence by the staff,
Speaker 1: and there is certainly no doubt that whoever the boss
Speaker 1: was should have been fired. But none of that happened,
Speaker 1: right we got Oh, the warden gets moved to a
Speaker 1: different jail facility. What about the manager on duty? Isn't
Speaker 1: there a chain of custody for the evidence? None of
Speaker 1: that came into play here. So while there was a
Speaker 1: gigantic shit storm of things that went wrong overall leading
Speaker 1: up to his death, and obviously on the night he died,
Speaker 1: there are no answers for any of that so far,
Speaker 1: and any time I ask people, who are you know
Speaker 1: in the legacy media or journalists or it's always the
Speaker 1: same answer, I don't know. Nobody can put all of
Speaker 1: this together. And there's a reason for that. Oh sure,
Speaker 1: they'll give you some documents. You really think this is
Speaker 1: all they had to give you? Stop it, give you
Speaker 1: enough to make you you know, all right, got some
Speaker 1: of the documents. I'm talking about the United States government here.
Speaker 1: I highly doubt we're ever going to find out the
Speaker 1: situation with Tartaglioni, and it's a huge issue. You have
Speaker 1: a guy, Tartaglioni, who was in jail for four homicides, right,
Speaker 1: alleged four homicides, and not just anybody. The people he
Speaker 1: is alleged to have killed are cartel associates. You don't
Speaker 1: just clip cartel associates if you're not somebody who's bowed
Speaker 1: it about it, ready to go. This dude clipped cartel
Speaker 1: associates over drugs, allegedly then gets busted with a contraband
Speaker 1: prison cell phone in his cell a few weeks before
Speaker 1: he's moved into a cell with one of the most
Speaker 1: high profile prisoners in the whole entire place. Then that
Speaker 1: prisoner attempts to quote unquote kill himself in that jail
Speaker 1: cell with TARTAGLIONI there, come on, man, that's the kind
Speaker 1: of shit you see on a horrible movie on like
Speaker 1: Prime that has like the two point three stars. It's
Speaker 1: all just an absolute dumpster fire. And you know, and
Speaker 1: I applaud the Times, the New York Times for at
Speaker 1: least trying to, you know, shed a little light here
Speaker 1: going after these documents, But really it comes down to
Speaker 1: are you asking the right questions? And we all know
Speaker 1: that the legacy media from the very beginning has been
Speaker 1: off target, And to be honest with you, they take
Speaker 1: their cue from independent content creators and independent journalists who
Speaker 1: have been working this case, a lot of them a
Speaker 1: lot longer than me. So the legacy media, you know,
Speaker 1: they finally catch up after getting lapped and we have
Speaker 1: conk conclusive evidence. No you don't, there's nothing conclusive here,
Speaker 1: you know. And it's also funny to me too. You
Speaker 1: have these you know, journalists who are always talking about, oh,
Speaker 1: the government's this or the government's that, but then they're
Speaker 1: so willing to just believe whatever the FBI or the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice tells them you can miss me with
Speaker 1: all of that. Maybe I'm too cynical for my own
Speaker 1: good at this point, but I don't believe anything the
Speaker 1: establishment tells me anything, and I don't care what side
Speaker 1: it's coming from. I check everything I hear these days,
Speaker 1: and I highly suggest that all of you out there
Speaker 1: listening to this podcast do the same. Don't just take
Speaker 1: my word for it. That's why I post these articles
Speaker 1: inside of the description box. Read along with me. But
Speaker 1: whatever you do, don't just take what you hear and say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: that's got to be the truth. Check all of it.
Speaker 1: Because we have been we have been dog walked by
Speaker 1: this legacy media for way too long. And previously we
Speaker 1: had no recourse. There was no alternative media. There was
Speaker 1: no you know, social media or independent content creators that
Speaker 1: have eight hundred and nine hundred thousand followers and a
Speaker 1: little bit of financing for them to make their own moves.
Speaker 1: There was none. That you were stuck with. What was
Speaker 1: ever pumped through your TV or on the radio, and
Speaker 1: that was it. But now people have choices, So the
Speaker 1: legacy media is going to have to step up their game.
Speaker 1: And the New York Times right here, definitely doing that.
Speaker 1: Got to give him their props, right, you know, I
Speaker 1: try not to just break chops around here. If somebody
Speaker 1: does a good job at these reporters, and there's been
Speaker 1: plenty of them that have, then we want to make
Speaker 1: sure we want we credit them, right. So the New
Speaker 1: York Times and Thistical definitely a good job going after
Speaker 1: this stuff. But my problem is, like always, it does
Speaker 1: not go far enough what happened leading up to the
Speaker 1: day of his death. Can anyone explain why he would
Speaker 1: be in a jail cell with Nicholas TARTAGLIONI. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm here, I'm waiting, and again I am more than
Speaker 1: willing to follow the evidence wherever it goes. If somebody
Speaker 1: gives me a logical reason why that occurred, then I
Speaker 1: am more than willing to bite. But if you say
Speaker 1: that there was negligence, and you say that there was
Speaker 1: these big mess ups at the prison, that I want
Speaker 1: massive firing. I want everybody involved, everybody who was even
Speaker 1: close to the situation fired, not relocated, none of that,
Speaker 1: because if we don't punish them, is what's just gonna
Speaker 1: happen again and again and again and again. So there
Speaker 1: has to be some kind of recourse, and personally, we
Speaker 1: haven't seen any of that, right, I haven't seen any
Speaker 1: of it. I haven't seen any sort of retribution or
Speaker 1: poor people who were on duty that night who let
Speaker 1: this happen. Just the two lowly guards and they get
Speaker 1: a deferred sentence. What about the boss? Where was the manager?
Speaker 1: Where was the you know, the head honcho, sergeant screw
Speaker 1: walking around smacking his night stick off of the cell bars?
Speaker 1: Where's that guy at? So nobody gets in trouble here,
Speaker 1: and we're just supposed to accept that it's just a
Speaker 1: big screw up. Guys, keep it moving, no big deal,
Speaker 1: This is what happens sometimes. Screw that. I'm not willing
Speaker 1: to accept that. If I have to do my job
Speaker 1: up to a certain standard, you inside of the jail
Speaker 1: safeguarding prisoners better get on board and do your job
Speaker 1: correctly as well, or you need to be fired. And
Speaker 1: I don't want to hear about unions or any of
Speaker 1: that shit either. All right, if you do not do
Speaker 1: your job up to a standard, that is, you know,
Speaker 1: at the very least the minimum, you gotta go. And
Speaker 1: letting Jeffrey Epstein get killed or kill himself in your facility.
Speaker 1: I would say that that's a fireable offense. All right.
Speaker 1: So let's take a look at this article from the
Speaker 1: Dai Mail and let's see what Shannon Thaler for Daly
Speaker 1: Mail has to say headline, I'm a coward. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: kill myself. How Jeffrey Epstein fooled jailside psychologists two weeks
Speaker 1: before hanging himself allegedly in his cell at as two
Speaker 1: thousand newly released prison documents shine light on his final days,
Speaker 1: including his complaint about his running toilet. So right off
Speaker 1: the bat, he fooled psychologists? How do we know that?
Speaker 1: You ever think that maybe the guy wasn't suicidal? Here's
Speaker 1: my biggest problem with the whole suicide situation. There is
Speaker 1: no evidence that the dude was feeling suicidal. There is
Speaker 1: nothing to back that up. And while I know that
Speaker 1: you know not everybody who commits suicide has a long
Speaker 1: history of circumstance that leads up to it. More times
Speaker 1: than not, people are depressed there, you know, in their emotions.
Speaker 1: So this psychologist got fooled, must not be great of
Speaker 1: a psychologist. Huh. So I again, I doubt that he
Speaker 1: fooled any jail psychologists. Jeffrey Epstein used his last days
Speaker 1: alive at a Manhattan jail, a jail complaining about his
Speaker 1: running toilet and fooling jail psychologists into thinking he wasn't suicidal.
Speaker 1: Two weeks before hanging himself in his jail cell, alleged, well,
Speaker 1: the whole bunch of people that he wasn't. So it wasn't,
Speaker 1: just like the psychologist. So again, there is so much
Speaker 1: gray area here and for anyone to assert that we
Speaker 1: have all of the information and we can make a
Speaker 1: declaration about what definitely occurred in that jail cell. Those
Speaker 1: are the kind of people that could just steer clear
Speaker 1: of me. Hear that nonsense. I want to see proof.
Speaker 1: And short of that, well, we're gonna keep having this discussion, right,
Speaker 1: We're gonna have the discussion about what occurred now as
Speaker 1: far as uh, you know, one way or the other,
Speaker 1: buying in one way or the other. Again, I remain
Speaker 1: agnostic wherever the evidence leads. More than two thirl Bureau
Speaker 1: of Prisons records obtained by the New York Times just
Speaker 1: days before Epstein's alleged co conspirator and alleged fellow child abuser,
Speaker 1: you know all of that stuff. Glenn Maxwell is set
Speaker 1: to start trial revealed Epstein was a con artist up
Speaker 1: until his last day. Well breaking news. Water is wet
Speaker 1: and the sky is blue. We all know Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: was a con artist, So what makes you think he
Speaker 1: wasn't doing the double con here again? To act like
Speaker 1: we know is kind of ludicrous in my opinion. We
Speaker 1: have no idea, and the Geil has been very quiet
Speaker 1: about what happened in there. The fact that The New
Speaker 1: York Times had to sue for the documents that they
Speaker 1: had to sue for tells you everything you need to
Speaker 1: know about the Department of Justice, about the Bureau of Prisons.
Speaker 1: All they're worried about is covering their ass. They don't
Speaker 1: want to have any egg on their face. They don't
Speaker 1: want to deal with this issue. Among the unclassified page
Speaker 1: which were uncovered after The Times filed the Freedom of
Speaker 1: Information Act lawsuit was a clinical intervention report, which was
Speaker 1: filed on July eleventh, twenty nineteen, and stated that Epstein
Speaker 1: continues to deny any suicidal id ideation, intention, or plan.
Speaker 1: So he fooled the psychologist. Everybody acts like Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: was like this gigantic You know, Brainchile. The dude was
Speaker 1: a fucking numschool folks, all right. He was shrewd when
Speaker 1: it comes to manipulating his way into society. He was
Speaker 1: great amongst the so called elite, but as far as
Speaker 1: being some master classman, as far as being a you know,
Speaker 1: Rhodes scholar, Come on, man, everybody who knows him talks
Speaker 1: about what an idiot he was. All of a sudden,
Speaker 1: the guy is a mensa. Can today stop it? I
Speaker 1: have no interest in killing myself, the disgraced financier Pedophile
Speaker 1: told a prison psychologist, according to the BOP documents. He
Speaker 1: also said he was a coward and did not like pain.
Speaker 1: I would not do that to myself. He added, well,
Speaker 1: I can agree with that. Definitely was a coward, So yeah,
Speaker 1: I could. I could definitely definitely see him saying that
Speaker 1: and for them to act like, oh he was he
Speaker 1: fooled the psychologist. Okay, I guess we can. You know,
Speaker 1: we have to definitely take that into account, and it's
Speaker 1: definitely a possibility. We don't know one hundred percent what
Speaker 1: occurred here. That's the whole point, right, Trying to get
Speaker 1: down through the weeds and into some area where we
Speaker 1: can see some open ground, and these two thousand pages
Speaker 1: of documents certainly shine some light on it, but enough
Speaker 1: for us to stick conclusively one way or the other
Speaker 1: what happened here, especially when you get into the reports
Speaker 1: and you see that Jeffrey Epstein wasn't talking like a
Speaker 1: man who wanted to kill himself. During another psychological evaluation
Speaker 1: just days after arising. Arriving at the prison, Epstein told
Speaker 1: a psychologist that being alive is fun. Yeah, that's an understatement.
Speaker 1: Also reportedly requested to speak to his lawyer, brush his teeth,
Speaker 1: and have a shower, and the psychologist noted that Epstein
Speaker 1: was polite and even had a sense of humor. The
Speaker 1: psychologist wrote he was future oriented and noted that he
Speaker 1: denied having ever sexually abused anyone and believed he would
Speaker 1: be released after his renewed bail hearing. So, according to her,
Speaker 1: he was future oriented, meaning he was thinking of the future.
Speaker 1: He thought he was going to get out at this
Speaker 1: bail hearing. Why wouldn't he think that with all of
Speaker 1: the people he knows, all the contacts he has, all
Speaker 1: of the people he had under his thumb. Of course
Speaker 1: he's thinking like that. Hell yeah, I'm getting out of here.
Speaker 1: Then he gets into that cell with Tartaglioni, and everything
Speaker 1: changes after that, doesn't it. Now. I don't know what
Speaker 1: happened in that cell, folks. I'm not gonna sit here
Speaker 1: and make pretend I do. Like a lot of other
Speaker 1: people will tell you, Oh, I know this one or
Speaker 1: that one, or stop it. We don't know. What I
Speaker 1: do know is this everything changed after he was in
Speaker 1: that room with Tartaglioni. What did Tartaglioni say to him
Speaker 1: in that room? What was the conversation about? Guess we'll
Speaker 1: never know. But less than a month later, on August tenth,
Speaker 1: the financier pedophile hanged himself with a bed sheet. According
Speaker 1: to the Medical Examiner, he was pronounced dead while awaiting
Speaker 1: trial on sex trafficking charges, and was facing forty five
Speaker 1: years in prison if convicted. Imagine only force fucking. It's
Speaker 1: enraging to think only forty five years. This dude should
Speaker 1: have been facing four thousand and five hundred years rico
Speaker 1: all of it. Epstein was tossed into the federal jail
Speaker 1: in Lower Manhattan until six, twenty nineteen, after he was
Speaker 1: arrested aboard his private jet Teterborough report in New Jersey
Speaker 1: following his return from Paris. Two years after Epstein's suicide,
Speaker 1: the old Federal jail closed down the BOP sided, crumbling
Speaker 1: security measures and infrastructure at the facility, which was once
Speaker 1: considered one of the most secured detention centers in the country.
Speaker 1: It goes to show you just the complete crumbling of
Speaker 1: society as it is. We have all of these jail
Speaker 1: cells and they're all disgusting shitholes, there's no doubt about it.
Speaker 1: And something like this is allowed to occur. It's such
Speaker 1: an embarrassment. And it doesn't matter if he killed himself
Speaker 1: or if he got killed. The fact that he was
Speaker 1: died in their custody is an absolute black eye to
Speaker 1: the whole entire system. An indictment stated that Epstein had
Speaker 1: recruited dozens of teenage girls throughout the nineteen nineties and
Speaker 1: early two thousands to engage in sexual acts with him
Speaker 1: and his billionaire friends at his mansion in Manhattan, a
Speaker 1: state in Palm Beach, and private island in Saint Thomas. Notice,
Speaker 1: there was no talk about New Mexico. The dude was
Speaker 1: so blated in New Mexico that it's not even funny.
Speaker 1: Nobody wanted to say shit down in New Mexico, Bill
Speaker 1: Richardson's backyard, the backyard of the Kings. Nobody wanted to
Speaker 1: have a conversation. I was down in New Mexico. I
Speaker 1: was in Santa Fe for four days. Talked to a
Speaker 1: few sources, some ex law enforcement, and it was all
Speaker 1: bad down at that Zoro Ranch, folks, from everything I
Speaker 1: heard from sources on the ground, from everything I have read,
Speaker 1: all of the people with knowledge of what went on,
Speaker 1: how Zoro Ranch hasn't been raided yet is beyond me.
Speaker 1: It is audacious that this place has remained untouched. In exchange,
Speaker 1: he would pay the young women hundreds of dollars in cash,
Speaker 1: according to the indictment. After the loss of his freedom,
Speaker 1: six year old spent a lot of time in conference
Speaker 1: rooms with lawyers to avoid his dirty cell, and spent
Speaker 1: the days leading up to his death meeting with psychologists
Speaker 1: to discuss his mental health. The Times reported here Epstein
Speaker 1: reminisced about his star studded social circle and even offered
Speaker 1: psychologists and other inmates investment advice. Such a stand up guy, huh,
Speaker 1: let me get some investment and advice from Jeffrey Epstein, No,
Speaker 1: thank you end up in prison, my luck. Honestly, who
Speaker 1: would want to hear anything from this guy, prisoner or otherwise.
Speaker 1: He also complained that he was upset about wearing an
Speaker 1: orange jumpsuit and being treated like a bad guy when
Speaker 1: he did not do anything wrong in the prison. Oh no,
Speaker 1: you're just a great guy, Jeffrey. You should have been
Speaker 1: treated even better. In fact, you shouldn't have even went
Speaker 1: to jail. Ever. The absolute detachment that these people have
Speaker 1: from reality is bonkers. It's almost impossible to understand. These
Speaker 1: people are so det from what real life is like
Speaker 1: and from what the real world is like, that there's
Speaker 1: not enough words to even explain it. He asked why
Speaker 1: he had to wear the brightly colored jumpsuit due to
Speaker 1: his being housed in Shoe also known as Special Housing
Speaker 1: Unit and the Hole, which is where the Federal Bureau
Speaker 1: of Prisons segregates prisoners by disciplinary action. Epstein requested that
Speaker 1: he'd be placed in a brown uniform during his legals
Speaker 1: and was told his concerns would be addressed in the
Speaker 1: Shoe meeting. The report also revealed Epstein complained about the
Speaker 1: running toilet in his cell, his difficulty sleeping, numbness in
Speaker 1: his right arm, feeling cold in his cell, and not
Speaker 1: having enough water in an attorney conference. So nothing to
Speaker 1: mind blowing there, huh, nothing to uh end of the
Speaker 1: world dish. So I don't you know again the hole
Speaker 1: he killed himself? While it's definitely a possibility, right, a
Speaker 1: big time possibility, there's nothing that is here that says
Speaker 1: to me, well, he definitely killed himself. According to the Times,
Speaker 1: the report failed to prove any conspiracy theories that Epstein's
Speaker 1: death was not a suicide or that he was assisted
Speaker 1: in killing himself to be true. Uh, what I don't
Speaker 1: even know what to say about stuff like that? Was
Speaker 1: that what their goal is to try and prove or
Speaker 1: disprove any conspiracy theories? How about just get into the truth.
Speaker 1: And it's funny that the New York Times is the
Speaker 1: arbiter of that. Huh. I'm old enough to remember weapons
Speaker 1: of mass destruction? Wasn't that one of their favorites that
Speaker 1: they pitched us have a long memory when it comes
Speaker 1: to being lied to folks, especially such as The New
Speaker 1: York Times. However they deal to They detailed how Epstein
Speaker 1: consistently lied to correctional officers and reassured those who interacted
Speaker 1: with him during his thirty six days of detention that
Speaker 1: he had much to live for. The court document noted
Speaker 1: that he did not appear to be in any distress
Speaker 1: at this time, and even said that he was living
Speaker 1: a wonderful life despite being on suicide watch. The BOP,
Speaker 1: which the time sued in order to access the documents,
Speaker 1: had created a task force reportedly committed to strengthening suicide
Speaker 1: prevention at the facility. Yeah, that worked out well. Huh.
Speaker 1: Their whole entire new unit that they have set up
Speaker 1: here worked out great, fantastic, the suicide prevention program. Again,
Speaker 1: the whole entire system is a dumpster fire, the whole
Speaker 1: Bureau of Prisons, the whole Bureau of Prisons. I just
Speaker 1: watched the video of some dude getting absolutely the crap
Speaker 1: kicked out of him in some lock up in Jersey,
Speaker 1: and it was unbelievable. So these prison systems, there's no
Speaker 1: doubt that they're broken and they need to be fixed,
Speaker 1: zero doubt about that. One month later, Epstein was found
Speaker 1: unconscious after hanging himself in his jail cell, leading then
Speaker 1: US Attorney General William Barr to blame his death on
Speaker 1: a perfect storm of screw ups. According to the Times,
Speaker 1: Barr said there were serious irregularities at the Metropolitan Correctional
Speaker 1: Center and although he failed to elaborate, heeled by bureau
Speaker 1: officials five weeks after Epstein died, said that his identity
Speaker 1: appeared to be based on his wealth power and association
Speaker 1: with other high profile individuals. According to The Times, two
Speaker 1: again see this is where we run into some trouble.
Speaker 1: Your whole basis can't be well. He's lying in one
Speaker 1: sense to the psychologist, but here he's telling the truth. Again,
Speaker 1: we don't know. The dude was a shrewd liar. There's
Speaker 1: no doubt about that. If you want to say he
Speaker 1: was good at anything, it was being a compulsive liar.
Speaker 1: He wasn't smart, but he was a fantastic liar, like
Speaker 1: top notch, better than Holden Callfield, top notch liar in
Speaker 1: Take Screening also falsely described Epstein as a blackmail and
Speaker 1: noted that he had no prior sex offense convictions. Yet
Speaker 1: he was a registered sex offender in Florida with two
Speaker 1: convictions in two thousand and eight for solicit it for
Speaker 1: solicitation of prostitution and procurement of miners. To engage in prostitution.
Speaker 1: According to The Times. Again, to be clear, a miner
Speaker 1: can't be a prostitute. How can somebody who's not able
Speaker 1: to consent be a prostitute? Very odd. He was sentenced
Speaker 1: to just thirteen months following his guilty plea. In two
Speaker 1: thousand and eight, it was revealed that a phone calls
Speaker 1: he made were also not recorded, logged or monitored, which
Speaker 1: was against the detention center's policy. I know, just a coincidence, right,
Speaker 1: All of this is just a coincidence, and it just
Speaker 1: leads to the fact that there's just some big mistakes
Speaker 1: mad night. That's basically what the Times is telling you, folks. Again,
Speaker 1: it's up to you to believe what you're gonna believe.
Speaker 1: Epstein lied to jail officials up until the night he
Speaker 1: killed himself, allegedly to get a moment alone, which was
Speaker 1: not allowed considering Epstein was monitored around the clock and
Speaker 1: was supposed to be assigned to cell mate. Oh well
Speaker 1: that all worked out so well. No cell mate, the
Speaker 1: previous cell mate, Tartaglione. Well we know about him, no
Speaker 1: one monitoring him, calls not being logged, camera's not being
Speaker 1: pointed in the right cell being checked in as a
Speaker 1: black man. Six irregularities, six coincidences they want you to believe.
Speaker 1: And that's just right off the top of my head.
Speaker 1: I mean, come on, the legacy shureer up to it,
Speaker 1: aren't they. He said he wanted to call his mother,
Speaker 1: who had died in two thousand and four, but instead
Speaker 1: phoned his thirty year old girlfriend, Corinna Shuliac from Belarus.
Speaker 1: Call log showed that Epstein called Shuliac on July thirtieth two.
Speaker 1: She was one of the largest beneficiaries of several trusts
Speaker 1: that Epstein set up over the year. According to The Times,
Speaker 1: Epstein reportedly helped put Shuliac through dental school, and people
Speaker 1: aware of the phone conversations the night before Epstein's suicide
Speaker 1: noted that he gave no indication that he had a
Speaker 1: plan to kill himself. Same thing his lawyer, Doug Shoan said.
Speaker 1: Doug Shoan said that they were prepared to battle this out.
Speaker 1: They had a plan in place, and they were ready
Speaker 1: to go to the mattresses and then Epstein just turns
Speaker 1: up dead. So again, all I'm telling you is all
Speaker 1: of these people that were talking to him said he
Speaker 1: wasn't suicidal, said that he had no plans to kill himself.
Speaker 1: Now could he have been bullshitting everybody? Help? We're gonna
Speaker 1: need more before we run around with headlines. Conclusively, come
Speaker 1: on really conclusively for who people that just want to
Speaker 1: scratch the surface. Maybe. The post mortem report added that therefore,
Speaker 1: likely factors contributing to mister Epstein's suicide include the lack
Speaker 1: of significant interpersonal connections. What shoely Act's girlfriend been like
Speaker 1: that forever? There's an interpersonal connection right there? So what
Speaker 1: does that mean? A complete loss of his status in
Speaker 1: both the community and among associates. Not yet, he still
Speaker 1: had people backing him up. He still had it wasn't
Speaker 1: a law cause at this point, and the idea of
Speaker 1: potentially spending his life in prison. While that could definitely
Speaker 1: be enough for anyone to want to kill themselves, no
Speaker 1: doubt about it. But the other stuff is ridiculous. I mean,
Speaker 1: lack of significant interpersonal connections, that's bs. The BOP declined
Speaker 1: to comment on Epstein's time at the Metropolitan Correctional Center,
Speaker 1: but wrote in a statement that the safe, secure, and
Speaker 1: humane housing of inmates is BOP's highest priority. According to
Speaker 1: The Times, oh you're failing at that if that's your
Speaker 1: highest priority, you guys better get it together, because holy shit,
Speaker 1: what an absolute you're fire. Okay, got people dying all
Speaker 1: over the place in this country in these jails. They're
Speaker 1: administered horribly, horribly. The Bureau had previously rejected the Times
Speaker 1: public records request on multiple occasions, which Judge Paul A.
Speaker 1: Engel Mayor of Federal District Court in Manhattan, later called
Speaker 1: a high profile epic failure. It certainly does raise a concern,
Speaker 1: Engelmeyer said, adding that the wagons are being circled. No,
Speaker 1: and their federal government does not want people to have
Speaker 1: the truth. That's just the way of it. It's not
Speaker 1: a conspiracy theory or anything like that. They will not
Speaker 1: give you the transparency you're looking for. They'll say it's
Speaker 1: national security, or they'll come up with some kind of
Speaker 1: wild ass excuse, and then they'll make you sue them
Speaker 1: to get it. And they know that most people don't
Speaker 1: have the funds to go in on some big lawsuit.
Speaker 1: To the settlement between BOP and The Times, the agency
Speaker 1: handed over internal memos and emails, visitor logs, handwritten notes
Speaker 1: from inmates, and the psychological reconstruction of Epstein's death. The
Speaker 1: Times reported that some documents were heavily redacted, while others
Speaker 1: remained classified, including records associated with Epstein's earlier suicide attempt. Bang,
Speaker 1: there you go. What did I tell you, folks? Okay,
Speaker 1: that's what it's all about. And I just had this
Speaker 1: conversation on Twitter with some reporters. Nobody. It's fine, and well,
Speaker 1: we can all we could talk about the night of
Speaker 1: but what led up to it? Why don't we talk
Speaker 1: about that? Can we get those records unclassified now that
Speaker 1: we can't write? And they'll tell you it's because TARTAGLIONI
Speaker 1: is still on truck. So stupid, It's an absolute joke.
Speaker 1: High profile inmate. After being arrested at Newport, Epstein was
Speaker 1: placed in general inmate population, where the jail security is
Speaker 1: the most lax. According to one of the two thousand
Speaker 1: released pages, Then acting director of the BOP Hugh Hurwitz
Speaker 1: later eternal email attributing Epstein's placement into general population as
Speaker 1: an oversight by the US Marshall Service. Boy, those guys
Speaker 1: are really entre. Again, whenever you think about this situation,
Speaker 1: just think about the name tartag Leoni. For you. We're
Speaker 1: at a point where it's just pretty much spinning of
Speaker 1: the wheels. Apparently USMS Marshall service did not indicate that
Speaker 1: he was a high profile inmate, and staff were unaware
Speaker 1: that he was plans had been established, he wrote, As
Speaker 1: reported by the Times, the facility's assistant later noted that
Speaker 1: Epstein was in a cell looking distraught, sad and a
Speaker 1: little confused, and an email sent to three jail officials
Speaker 1: he seems dazed and withdrawn, the assistant added, she wrote,
Speaker 1: just to be on the safe side and prevent any
Speaker 1: suicidal thoughts, can someone from psychology come and talk with him?
Speaker 1: But according to the records, no one did at first,
Speaker 1: and a day after he was arrested on July seventh,
Speaker 1: twenty teen, the center's warden, Lemine and Die, finally identified
Speaker 1: Epstein as high profile and had him move to the Shoe,
Speaker 1: which was located on floor nine of twelve. So it
Speaker 1: took them all this time to even get him off
Speaker 1: the main line. And then, let's remember this warden was
Speaker 1: never fired. He just got moved over to a different facility.
Speaker 1: It's like the Catholic church right moving priests around. And
Speaker 1: Die cited concerns for the safety in general pop the
Speaker 1: next morning, at nine point thirty was Epstein's first psychological
Speaker 1: evaluation and he was scheduled to make his first court
Speaker 1: appearance the afternoon. The psychologist anticipated Epstein's bell denial and wrote,
Speaker 1: according to one of the unclassified documents inmate Epstein will
Speaker 1: likely be receiving bad news in court today and has
Speaker 1: multiple risk factors for suicide as identified by BOP statistics.
Speaker 1: Let's be proactive. So according to that article, that piece
Speaker 1: of documentation definitely something that they have to be on
Speaker 1: the lookout for. Right you get somebody in jail, you
Speaker 1: don't know if they're going to kill themselves or not.
Speaker 1: You don't know what's going through someone's mind, so you
Speaker 1: got to be proactive. Unfortunately they weren't. After his learning,
Speaker 1: Epstein was moved to the less restrictive psychological observation cell,
Speaker 1: where fellow inmates were tasked with monitoring the disgraced financier
Speaker 1: Pedophile in his cell and report his actions every fifteen minutes.
Speaker 1: On July ninth, the psychologist confirmed that suicide watch was
Speaker 1: not necessary for Epstein and he should be placed on
Speaker 1: psychological observation out of an abundance of caution, so that
Speaker 1: psychologists should be fired as well. Is that psychologists still
Speaker 1: seeing other clients in the jail? If so, are you
Speaker 1: comfortable with that? I'm certainly not. According to the Times,
Speaker 1: Epstein asked for his own cell, but was told he
Speaker 1: could not be alone for safety and security reasons. On
Speaker 1: July tenth, it was documented that Epstein smirked and asked
Speaker 1: a psychologist, why would you ever think I would be suicidal?
Speaker 1: I'm not suicidal and I would never be. Inmates continue
Speaker 1: to observe Epstein instead, and their notes were often lackluster
Speaker 1: and read Epstein is drinking water at the sink. I'm
Speaker 1: sure he wasn't doing very much in the jail cell. Okay.
Speaker 1: The fact that they have jailhouse snitches watching high profile
Speaker 1: inmates is uncomfortable for me as well. How about pis
Speaker 1: more guards? A lot of people out of work, Go
Speaker 1: and hire yourself a couple of guards. On July eighteenth,
Speaker 1: Judge Richard M. Berman denied Epstein's renewed bail request, and
Speaker 1: nearly one week later, on July twenty third, Epstein made
Speaker 1: his first suicide attempt. Allegedly that's when he was in
Speaker 1: the cell with Tartaglione, man who was want who allegedly
Speaker 1: committed four violent homicides against Mexican cartel operators. I'll let
Speaker 1: you come up with the rest, but for me, very
Speaker 1: very very interesting and something that still hasn't been explained.
Speaker 1: As we seen earlier, it sealed, it's still classified. I
Speaker 1: wonder why. The post mortem psychological reconstruction seemingly blamed the
Speaker 1: fell suicide attempt on the denial of bail as a
Speaker 1: significant disappointment for Epstein, which likely challenged his ability and
Speaker 1: willingness to adapt to incarceration. The report also noted that
Speaker 1: a psychologist should have assessed mister Epstein's mental status upon
Speaker 1: his return to the institution, but they did not. Again,
Speaker 1: more failures, more institutional failures. And really what it all
Speaker 1: comes down to, if he killed himself, he didn't kill himself.
Speaker 1: The federal government failed the survivors again multiple times throughout
Speaker 1: this whole entire ordeal. They were failed bot Perl government.
Speaker 1: He was removed from suicide watch thirty one hours after
Speaker 1: his attempt and placed back on psychological evaluation. According to
Speaker 1: The Times, a July twenty ninth entry said Epstein is
Speaker 1: sitting on the edge of the bed with his head
Speaker 1: and the palm of his hands. Not a word about Tartaglione. Folks,
Speaker 1: they want you to forget. Guess what we're not going
Speaker 1: to forget. During the time, he also consistently complained about
Speaker 1: the running toilet, in which made him grow increasingly frustrated.
Speaker 1: A psychologist noted that Epstein told them he would sit
Speaker 1: in the corner and hold his ears, speculating that he
Speaker 1: might have autism because of the aversion to noise. Okay,
Speaker 1: I don't know, certainly don't know enough about autism to
Speaker 1: give you an opinion. There. Some inmates briefed conversations they
Speaker 1: had with the jail social light, and one said, Epstein
Speaker 1: is talking about celebs he knows. So this is just
Speaker 1: more of that stuff. We're not gonna I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: keep going through all that. It's stupid. More entries of
Speaker 1: what the you know, the people were who were watching
Speaker 1: him have to say. Among the other documents obtained by
Speaker 1: the Times was an orange colored sign that red mandatory
Speaker 1: rounds must be conducted every thirty minutes on Epstein per
Speaker 1: uh inmate number seven six three one eight dash zero
Speaker 1: five to four as per God. So they're saying that
Speaker 1: these had to be done on Epstein but they weren't done.
Speaker 1: These people did not do their rounds. They didn't check
Speaker 1: on Epstein. Epstein was put back in schee on July thirtieth,
Speaker 1: with cellmate Ephron Reyes stone Reyes, who was serving time
Speaker 1: for assisting the government in a drug distribution conspiracy case.
Speaker 1: Epstein had complained that Reyes talking kept him up at night,
Speaker 1: at least until August ninth, when Reyes was transferred out
Speaker 1: of the Manhattan jail. I have done an article previously
Speaker 1: about stone Reis and what he had to say about Epstein.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna post that one later so you folks can
Speaker 1: check that out as well. That day, Epstein also met
Speaker 1: with lawyers as federal appeal as a federal appeals court
Speaker 1: released about two thousand pages of previously classified documents to
Speaker 1: use in a defamation lawsuit against Maxwell. According to The Times,
Speaker 1: at six thirty am the next day, Epstein would kill himself.
Speaker 1: He was pronounced dead an hour later, and officials would
Speaker 1: later predict that the graphic details uncovered uncovered in those
Speaker 1: documents further eroded his mental state. Now that's definitely a
Speaker 1: possibility as well, one hundred percent of possibility that he
Speaker 1: might have thought that this was it for him, and
Speaker 1: he decided to call it a day again. I don't
Speaker 1: know for sure, folks, so I won't sit here and
Speaker 1: hammer home one one opinion or the other into your heads.
Speaker 1: I don't know, But for me, I think that the
Speaker 1: most important piece of this puzzle that is not being
Speaker 1: discussed is TARTAGLIONI. What did he play? Why was he
Speaker 1: in that jail cell with Jeffrey Epstein? And was he
Speaker 1: there to send a message? Again, I don't have evidence
Speaker 1: to back that up, but those are the questions that
Speaker 1: I ask all the time, and those are the questions
Speaker 1: that have yet to be answered. If you'd like to
Speaker 1: contact me, you can do that at Bobby Kapuci at
Speaker 1: ProtonMail dot com. That's Bo Bby c ap Ucci at
Speaker 1: ProtonMail dot com. You can also find me on Twitter
Speaker 1: at Bobby underscore c ap Ucci. The link that we
Speaker 1: discussed can be found in the description box. All right, folks,
Speaker 1: today we're gonna jump down to the US Virgin Islands
Speaker 1: and check in on a New York Times lawsuit that
Speaker 1: they filed to get some information about Epstein's activities down there.
Speaker 1: Now I know, I give you the New York Times
Speaker 1: a hard time a lot of the time. But when
Speaker 1: they do their investigative work and they get away from
Speaker 1: the division and the nonsense, they do good stuff right,
Speaker 1: they can have an impact. You See, here's the thing.
Speaker 1: They have a lot of resources, The Gray Lady, the
Speaker 1: Washington Post, these outlets have the resources to really dig
Speaker 1: in on these investigations. So when they utilize those resources
Speaker 1: and actually investigate things that affect us and matter to
Speaker 1: us and not simply divide us, well they should be
Speaker 1: given a tip of the cap. And when it comes
Speaker 1: to stuff like this, digging in deeper into Jeffrey Epstein's
Speaker 1: financials and how the whole entire thing was set up
Speaker 1: in the Virgin Islands, you can damn well guarantee that
Speaker 1: they'll get a tip of the cap from me for that.
Speaker 1: So they have filed a Freedom of Information Act and
Speaker 1: they're suing the president of the Economic Development Authority. They
Speaker 1: want financial records, business documents, all kinds of things relating
Speaker 1: to Jeffrey Epstein. And to tell you the truth, I've
Speaker 1: been wondering what's going on. Why this hasn't happened previously,
Speaker 1: Why isn't the SDN, why going crazy down here trying
Speaker 1: to find out the genesis of the money, how it
Speaker 1: all started, where it was going, who was getting money
Speaker 1: sent to them, who was part of this conspiracy. You
Speaker 1: know why, because they have no desire to dig deeper.
Speaker 1: What they're gonna do, like I've thought they were gonna
Speaker 1: do from the very jump, is stop it all at
Speaker 1: Glen Maxwell. There's not gonna be other arrests as far
Speaker 1: as these high flyers or anything like that. They're not
Speaker 1: going to dig deeper into the financials because they know
Speaker 1: that those financials will inevitably lead back to some of
Speaker 1: their buddies in government. We all know Epstein was flinging
Speaker 1: money around to everybody that he thought he could in ruins.
Speaker 1: So they don't want to chase the money. They don't
Speaker 1: want to dig into the financials and have forensic accountants
Speaker 1: going wild because they know that that is the inroad,
Speaker 1: that is the real way to get all of these people.
Speaker 1: Let's remember al Capone wasn't caught up on murder charges
Speaker 1: and all the other things. It was tax evasion. And
Speaker 1: every single one of these people rolling around with Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 1: if you open up their closet, I guarant fucking te
Speaker 1: you they're engaging in tax evasion of some sort as
Speaker 1: well money laundering, whatever it may be. That is the
Speaker 1: bread and butter for these disgusting, greedy oligarchs. It's not
Speaker 1: good enough for them that they have a bazillion loopholes
Speaker 1: in the tax code. No, they have to steal on
Speaker 1: top of that, as well as not paying any taxes.
Speaker 1: The banking cartel, their friends, and the whole entire infrastructure
Speaker 1: that supports this money laundering system has to be shattered.
Speaker 1: The money that's being siphoned, especially from the developing world,
Speaker 1: is astronomical in the amount, and you don't think that
Speaker 1: money could go to helping the people of we'll just
Speaker 1: use the Virgin Islands here for this instance that we're
Speaker 1: talking about here. You don't think the money that Epstein
Speaker 1: should have been paying in taxes, or they should have
Speaker 1: been paying for the site fees or whatever it was,
Speaker 1: couldn't help the people of the Virgin Islands. What everybody
Speaker 1: in the Virgin Islands is rich. They don't need to eat.
Speaker 1: Of course they do, and of course they're not. But
Speaker 1: you think these people care, These bureaucrats, and especially people
Speaker 1: like Epstein, they don't give a fuck, all right, So
Speaker 1: let's jump into this article from the Saint Thomas Source
Speaker 1: and let's see what author Cyan Cobb has to say.
Speaker 1: Headline New York Times sues EDA CEO Biggs for Epstein documents.
Speaker 1: The New York Times has sued Economic Development Authority CEO
Speaker 1: Waynebiggs Junior and the Virgin Islands government for access to
Speaker 1: financial and business documents of the late disgraced financier pedophile
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein under the territory's Open Records Act. So it's
Speaker 1: like a freedom of information Act right like we were
Speaker 1: used to. And unfortunately, our government doesn't believe in transparency.
Speaker 1: So you have to go through all of these steps
Speaker 1: to file a Freedom of Information Act and then if
Speaker 1: you're lucky enough to have it recognized, then you'll get
Speaker 1: some of the information. But they may make it difficult.
Speaker 1: You gotta jump through some hoops. You gotta here's an idea,
Speaker 1: just be transparent. You know they want to have all
Speaker 1: these fucking commissions all the time, and oh, we're gonna
Speaker 1: we're gonna study what happened on January sixth. There's still
Speaker 1: nothing about Epstein. Have we had a committee on what
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was up to have we had a committee
Speaker 1: on any of the other poorest fucking nonsense that's going
Speaker 1: on in the country. No, only on what they think
Speaker 1: they can divide us with, what's gonna help them expediently
Speaker 1: get elected. It's a joke, It's an absolute joke. How
Speaker 1: about we have a commission that deals with everything Epstein,
Speaker 1: every single person that was in that black book, Bring
Speaker 1: them in, sit them down, let's have a talk all
Speaker 1: of it. But the government has no they have no
Speaker 1: our politicians have no interest in it. Right, so we're
Speaker 1: left with things like Freedom of inform Nation Acts and
Speaker 1: relying on you know, the New York Times or outlets
Speaker 1: with resources to do the right thing, and then you
Speaker 1: just hope that they do. Where it shouldn't be like that.
Speaker 1: Here's an idea, a little bit of transparency. Please, we
Speaker 1: really need a two and a half year investigation into
Speaker 1: what went on in that jail cell. You guys don't
Speaker 1: have that investigation wrapped up yet. I mean, it's amazing,
Speaker 1: and it's it's not that they can't have it wrapped up.
Speaker 1: What they do, as we all know, is they keep
Speaker 1: the investigation going so they can use that as a
Speaker 1: reason for not being transparent. Epstein received Economic Development Commission
Speaker 1: benefits through the Southern Trust Company, Incorporated, which had an
Speaker 1: office in Red Hook. Now we know that Southern Trust
Speaker 1: was bunk. We know that it wasn't a real setup,
Speaker 1: and we know that it was obviously a place where
Speaker 1: he was washing money, moving dark money. And still nothing,
Speaker 1: we haven't heard shit or shinola about it. For the
Speaker 1: most part. The Economic Development Commission is an entity within
Speaker 1: the Economic Development Authority that gives out ninety percent to
Speaker 1: one hundred percent tax breaks on most taxes as an
Speaker 1: incentive to set up offices in the US Virgin Islands.
Speaker 1: The multimillionaire pedophile who listed as primary residence as Little
Speaker 1: Saint James Island off of Saint Thomas, was arrested on
Speaker 1: federal sex trafficking charges in July twenty nineteen and died
Speaker 1: of an apparent suicide at a New York City jail
Speaker 1: in August twenty and nineteen. He left an estate valued
Speaker 1: at more than half a billion dollars. And this is
Speaker 1: what I've talked about from the beginning with the Virgin
Speaker 1: Islands and Denise George. Now, remember Denise George wanted it
Speaker 1: so that the Virgin Islands gets paid out and they
Speaker 1: get some restitution here. Well, I was never down with that,
Speaker 1: considering it was Virgin Islands officials who set Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: up with these sweetheart deals in the first place. So
Speaker 1: I don't see how Denise George or anybody else should
Speaker 1: think that the Virgin Islands should get some money out
Speaker 1: of this. It's ridiculous. If anything, if I was one
Speaker 1: of these survivors, I might sue the Virgin Islands. It
Speaker 1: was their officials who set this all in motion. It
Speaker 1: was their officials who gave Epstein this base of operations.
Speaker 1: It was their officials who went into business with Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 1: So why would Denise George think that they deserve some
Speaker 1: dough It never made any sense to me. Right, And
Speaker 1: now the New York Times, well they're suing for this information.
Speaker 1: Who was involved, who gave these tax breaks, Who help
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein manipulate this system. Among the documents the newspaper
Speaker 1: is seeking are the income tax returns for Southern Trust Company. Well,
Speaker 1: you know those are going to be fudged and manipulated.
Speaker 1: There's no way that it's on the up and up,
Speaker 1: no matter what those transcripts say. At least in my opinion,
Speaker 1: Southern Trust companies audited financial statements again, you know, fudged numbers.
Speaker 1: Who knows what's going on? When you have someone like
Speaker 1: Cohn working as your accountant, you know who the hell knows.
Speaker 1: The sky's the limit when it comes to fuck baggery
Speaker 1: applications for tax incentives and related documents. Those are important
Speaker 1: because it should leave a paper trail on who was
Speaker 1: involved with Epstein when he was putting these deals in place.
Speaker 1: All records apply to the Virgin Island Attorney General relating
Speaker 1: to the company in Epstein. So I don't know how
Speaker 1: that's going to be as far as what Denise George
Speaker 1: has sealed or what's sealed by the court right now,
Speaker 1: but I don't blame them for trying to get that information.
Speaker 1: All correspondents exchanged between employees, board members, contractors and executives
Speaker 1: of the EDA and Southern Trust Company from January first,
Speaker 1: twenty twelve to the present. That's a pretty broad ask there,
Speaker 1: and I think it's a good idea. It covers a
Speaker 1: decent clip of time, and it should be able to
Speaker 1: give us or The New York Times at least a
Speaker 1: little bit more of a look into the financials, and
Speaker 1: like I've said from the jump, folks, the financials are
Speaker 1: one of the most important pieces of this whole puzzle,
Speaker 1: and not enough time is spent on them. If you
Speaker 1: really want to put people in prison that were related
Speaker 1: to Epstein, and if the prosecution was really serious about that,
Speaker 1: this is the pathway, or as the dude in the
Speaker 1: mandelori and says, this is the way. All correspondents exchanged
Speaker 1: between employees, board members, contractors and executives of the EDA
Speaker 1: and Epstein from January first, twenty twelve to the present
Speaker 1: and compliance reports prepared by EDC staff on Southern Trust Company. Boy,
Speaker 1: it's a pretty uh broad ask here, and it would
Speaker 1: shed some light on things. There's no doubt if we
Speaker 1: could have access to those documents that the Times is
Speaker 1: trying to get, it definitely will shine some light on
Speaker 1: how Epstein was able to set this trust up, who
Speaker 1: was helping him, who gave him the tax breaks, who
Speaker 1: his contact was, and what it will really do, in
Speaker 1: my opinion, will it will throw a whole, entire gigantic
Speaker 1: poolsworth of cold water on Denise George's lame idea of
Speaker 1: trying to get some money for the Virgin Islands. Here,
Speaker 1: The New York Times said in its suit that Biggs
Speaker 1: failed to respond to the newspaper's public records request, and
Speaker 1: allegation the CEO has denied. While acknowledging that it must
Speaker 1: comply with all laws of the US Virgin Islands, including
Speaker 1: the Open Records Act. VAIDA is under an obligation to
Speaker 1: protect all the confidential documents of all its beneficiaries. BIGS,
Speaker 1: represented by attorney Henry C. Smock, said in an answer
Speaker 1: to the suit, again, their answer is always more secrecy.
Speaker 1: That is always the government's answer when we're seeking transparency
Speaker 1: or we're seeking answers. Oh, you want transparency, now, we'll
Speaker 1: give you more secrecy. And then they'll say, Oh, it's
Speaker 1: to protect so and so, it's so and show's privacy
Speaker 1: that we're protecting. Meanwhile, they don't give a fuck about privacy.
Speaker 1: They're collecting the met metadata of every single call, every email,
Speaker 1: every text message, everything you do they're collecting. Then they
Speaker 1: want to talk about the government's privacy. Breaking news. The
Speaker 1: government doesn't have any privacy unless it's a national security issue.
Speaker 1: Go get fucked with that whole entire line of thinking.
Speaker 1: I'm tired of it. All of these governments, regional and national,
Speaker 1: with their stupidity and their nonsense. Oh, this is national security.
Speaker 1: We can't give you any information. Oh what do you
Speaker 1: mean someone just stole some potatoes. How's that a national
Speaker 1: security threat? Oh well, we can't tell you. This is
Speaker 1: a very serious operation, basically what it's like. Right. I
Speaker 1: don't know about you guys, but I'm fucking sick of it,
Speaker 1: and I'm tired of a complicit legacy media. So it's
Speaker 1: nice to see The New York Times stepping out of
Speaker 1: the box here and doing something for the people for once.
Speaker 1: In its response, the Virgin Islands Government said it is
Speaker 1: not a proper party to the action, that the VI
Speaker 1: Code identifies the EDA as a public corporate having a
Speaker 1: legal personality separate and apart from the Government of the
Speaker 1: Virgin Islands, and that the documents sought are solely in
Speaker 1: the possession and control of the EDA. So of course
Speaker 1: the finger pointing begins, right, The Virgin Island government says, Hey, look,
Speaker 1: we have no we don't have any responsibility for this
Speaker 1: contractor that works for us. It's a joke, right, everybody
Speaker 1: that we have in power, And I don't care who
Speaker 1: your favorite politician is. You shouldn't have any, by the way,
Speaker 1: but I don't care who your favorite politician is. They're
Speaker 1: all clowns, every last one of them. You have this
Speaker 1: asshole Ted Cruz talking to people who lost their job,
Speaker 1: I mean, lost the unemployment. Oh go get a job.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it's so simple, Ted Cruz, how about you
Speaker 1: start fucking doing your job. Maybe not run away to
Speaker 1: you know, a vacation when your state's in the middle
Speaker 1: of a national disaster or a emergency. You know, these people,
Speaker 1: they're so tone deaf, they have no idea what the
Speaker 1: rest of us are going through on a daily basis.
Speaker 1: And all of them. I'm disgusted by the whole entire
Speaker 1: political class, which there shouldn't be, by the way, was
Speaker 1: never meant to be a career, okay, but these people
Speaker 1: that message from Ted Cruz, that tweet from Ted Cruz
Speaker 1: or wherever the fuck he sent that message, that just
Speaker 1: shows you how they really feel about you. And let's remember,
Speaker 1: most of these people out of work. They didn't quit
Speaker 1: their jobs. Their jobs were taken from them when the
Speaker 1: government shut down whatever fucking industry they were in. And
Speaker 1: now they're the assholes. So yeah, Ted Cruz and the
Speaker 1: rest of these scumbags, they can all go get fucked.
Speaker 1: As far as I'm concerned, I have no patience for
Speaker 1: them and no desire to carry water for any of them.
Speaker 1: In fact, what we're gonna do on the podcast is
Speaker 1: we're gonna continue to put a microscope on their bullshit.
Speaker 1: That's what we're gonna do here. We'll let everybody else
Speaker 1: engage in their bs tribalism and you know, the pitchforks
Speaker 1: and the torches battling with each other. I ain't got
Speaker 1: time for it, zero time for it. Today. The release
Speaker 1: of information regarding Southern Trust Company, Incorporated serves as a
Speaker 1: legitimate public purpose as the company is a defendant in
Speaker 1: the case of the Government of the US Virgin Islands
Speaker 1: versus Darren k Indyke at All and is accused of
Speaker 1: fraudently obtaining eighty million dollars from the GVII. Southern Trust
Speaker 1: Incorporated is also accused of funding Jeffrey E. Epstein's criminal activities.
Speaker 1: The New York Times set in its suit, pretty clear
Speaker 1: that the EDA should be ponying up this information, pretty
Speaker 1: clear that they were involved with Epstein. It's all pretty clear.
Speaker 1: But again they'll say that it's You're not entitled to
Speaker 1: these documents, parthocracy, parpathos or whatever nonsense they drum up in.
Speaker 1: Dyke is the executor of Epstein's estate, with Richard Kahn,
Speaker 1: the chief administrator of the late financier pedophiles various trusts
Speaker 1: and companies. The Virgin Islands Justice Department filed suit against
Speaker 1: them in Virgin Island Superior Court in January twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: seeking compensation for the territory and victims believed to have
Speaker 1: been subjected to abuse at Epstein's compound on Little Saint
Speaker 1: James in Pillsbury Sound. There's been an avalanche of motions
Speaker 1: and subpoenas in the twenty months since, but no resolution
Speaker 1: to the case. And see that's what I was talking
Speaker 1: about a second ago, with the Virgin Islands looking to
Speaker 1: catch a few bucks out of this deal. You know,
Speaker 1: I really don't have too much criticism of Denise George.
Speaker 1: She's been doing some pretty good work down here, and
Speaker 1: I think that it's shrewd work trying to get subpoenas here.
Speaker 1: I think it's a good idea, but it sours me
Speaker 1: when I see the cash grab. It's bad enough that
Speaker 1: the government took the lion's share of the money from
Speaker 1: that fund and from the estate when it comes to taxes.
Speaker 1: Now you got another government entity with their handout. That
Speaker 1: doesn't seem obscene to anybody else. As if the US
Speaker 1: Virgin Islands is going to take money out of the
Speaker 1: mouths and out of the pockets of the survivors, it
Speaker 1: just it's unseemly. It doesn't sit well with me. And
Speaker 1: if the United States of the Virgin Islands wants to
Speaker 1: get involved in the cash grab, don't worry. There's three
Speaker 1: and a half trillion coming down the pipe soon. I'm
Speaker 1: sure you're gonna get your peace. Additionally, the notorious activities
Speaker 1: of Jeffrey Epstein in the US, Virgin Islands and elsewhere
Speaker 1: has been a matter of national and international news for
Speaker 1: a period of years, culminating with his arrest on July sixth,
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, on sex trafficking charges. The New York Times said,
Speaker 1: so it is a matter of public interest at this point, right,
Speaker 1: this is a huge, gigantic international case, and the New
Speaker 1: York Times their reasoning is this information will move the
Speaker 1: conversation forward in the public sphere. At the time of
Speaker 1: his arrests Epstein was already a convicted sex offender after
Speaker 1: pleading guilty in June two thousand and eight in Florida
Speaker 1: to sexually abusing a female miner in what later became
Speaker 1: a highly controversial plea agreement that was kept secret from
Speaker 1: dozens of other plaintiffs, several of them as young as
Speaker 1: fourteen at the time of the alleged assaults. Justice officials
Speaker 1: alleged in their suit that Epstein maintained a deliberately complex
Speaker 1: web of Virgin Island corporations, limited liability companies, foundations, and
Speaker 1: other entities, not all of which are yet known to
Speaker 1: the Government of the Virgin Islands through which he carried
Speaker 1: out and concealed his criminal conduct right there in black
Speaker 1: and white ink forty folks, all of the things that
Speaker 1: we talked about previously, before these subpoenas even came out,
Speaker 1: before the Denise George made these assertions, These are all
Speaker 1: of the things that we were talking about, these money stashes,
Speaker 1: washing stations, offshore entities. And then to get that confort
Speaker 1: of the confirmation from Denise George and the suit, it
Speaker 1: just goes to show you you're sniffing down the right path, folks.
Speaker 1: No matter what, all these knuckleheads talk about, Oh, it's
Speaker 1: got a conspiracy theory, Brett, No, it's not. Maybe some
Speaker 1: of the other nonsense surrounding it is. But the core
Speaker 1: of this case, the actual meat and potatoes of this case,
Speaker 1: not a conspiracy theory, more like a fucking criminal conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Entities named in the government's lawsuit include the nineteen fifty
Speaker 1: three trust created by Epstein two days before his death
Speaker 1: containing his financial assets, Nautilus Incorporated, owner of a Little
Speaker 1: Saint James, Great Saint Jim LLC, owner of three parcels
Speaker 1: of land on the Great Saint James, Poplar Incorporated, a
Speaker 1: limited liability company holding the title for Great Saint James.
Speaker 1: Plan d LLC, owner of aircraft that Justice officials say
Speaker 1: were used to transport sex trafficking victims. And Hyperion Eir LLC,
Speaker 1: registered owner of helicopters allegedly used to transport sex trafficking survivors.
Speaker 1: So look, and that's just what we know about. How
Speaker 1: long have I been telling you guys that there are nameless,
Speaker 1: nameless LLC's that Epstein was involved with. What do you
Speaker 1: think this is it? This is the full monty of
Speaker 1: everything he had going on. No way this dude was
Speaker 1: washing a ton of money overseas. He had a whole
Speaker 1: entire plan in place, and all of the people around
Speaker 1: him that were part of this criminal conspiracy, well, they
Speaker 1: were the straw that stirred the drink. Expert depositions in
Speaker 1: the New York Times suit were due by August thirtieth,
Speaker 1: with a deadline of September thirty for mediation and so
Speaker 1: called Dober emotions special motions that are used before or
Speaker 1: during trial to exclude the presentation of unqualified evidence to
Speaker 1: the jerry. A status conference and trial date have yet
Speaker 1: to be scheduled by the court. Well, folks, finally a
Speaker 1: little movement down there in the Virgin Islands. We really
Speaker 1: haven't had too much to talk about down there recently,
Speaker 1: but with the New York Times here with this suit,
Speaker 1: maybe we'll get a little bit more information to come
Speaker 1: out of there, especially with this September thirtieth deadline. So
Speaker 1: we'll see where it goes and we'll see what comes
Speaker 1: out of it. But one thing is definitely for sure,
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein had his fingers in many pies when it
Speaker 1: comes to offshore money laundering. If you'd like to contact me,
Speaker 1: you can do that at Bobby Kapuchi at ProtonMail dot com.
Speaker 1: That's Bobby c ap Ucci at ProtonMail dot com. You
Speaker 1: can also find me on Twitter at b O B
Speaker 1: B Y, Underscore c A p U C C I.
Speaker 1: All of the links that go with this episode can
Speaker 1: be found in the description box. All right, folks, we'll
Speaker 1: be back later on