Speaker 1: Get ready for one fantastic a ride does Like My
Speaker 1: Favorite Pokemon, I Choose You. My Little Pony is an
Speaker 1: animated show from the nineteen eighties which has seen its
Speaker 1: fair share of reboots, movies, merchandise, and reimaginings. The most
Speaker 1: popular version of it today, at least as far as
Speaker 1: I can tell, is the newer Friendship Is Magic Show.
Speaker 1: The premise is pretty similar to the original. A bunch
Speaker 1: of magical pony characters always have to save the day
Speaker 1: from something or someone and learn about some type of
Speaker 1: positive social notion on the way. This iteration, though, is
Speaker 1: much snappier and it has a modern animation style. It's
Speaker 1: earned it number one place in the hearts of many
Speaker 1: adults today, too, like to the point where there's such
Speaker 1: a phenomenon as quote Bronie's men buying their favorite ponies
Speaker 1: branded merchandise, and much much more. I have known about
Speaker 1: the general idea of Tolpa's for years now, but never
Speaker 1: did I think that any grown up was combining the
Speaker 1: idea of Tolpa's and colorful children's cartoon characters. This episode
Speaker 1: actually is inspired directly by that discovery. Here's what I've
Speaker 1: conjured up for you. What precisely is a topa. At
Speaker 1: the most basic level, a topa is a thought form
Speaker 1: being that is created from intense concentration. Originally, the idea
Speaker 1: is said to be from the highest levels of Tibetan
Speaker 1: spiritual magic. That's magic with a K, meaning that it
Speaker 1: was ritual centered ceremonial magic. It apparently was also almost
Speaker 1: exclusively reserved for high level group magic, as it is regarded,
Speaker 1: or at least it was, as one of the most difficult,
Speaker 1: if not the most difficult type of magic to complete
Speaker 1: effectively and appropriately, as instructed by the masters of the religion. Additionally,
Speaker 1: the serious Tibetan Buddhism masters and pupils of the ages
Speaker 1: gone by had many commandments about how, when, why, where
Speaker 1: to work with non corporeal beings and tulbas, and which
Speaker 1: types of tulbas to create and when, why how. Their
Speaker 1: version of tolpamatcy was a sacred art practiced almost exclusively
Speaker 1: in holy service of the community. Outside of the traditional
Speaker 1: Tibetan religion and practices, there exists a number of separate
Speaker 1: classes of thought beings in the wider occult and mysticism community.
Speaker 1: Gullums are said to be thought forms that are typically
Speaker 1: programmed with one command. They are brought to life in
Speaker 1: order to fulfill one mission or command only. Another serious
Speaker 1: tulpa type is the servitor. From what I understand, these
Speaker 1: types of thought forms are made by using sigils. These,
Speaker 1: unlike gollums, can be programmed for multiple commands, and sometimes
Speaker 1: can be said to gain sentience. They apparently still lack
Speaker 1: free will. However, even with sentience, there are also the
Speaker 1: igregor and others.
Speaker 2: These days, as with many other concepts, the layman's notion
Speaker 2: of the tulpa has changed with the times, people, culture,
Speaker 2: and language. Whereas it used to be a strict religious
Speaker 2: termsteped in mystery, today it is often used more casually
Speaker 2: on the Internet and amongst the youth to talk about
Speaker 2: an accidentally created imaginary friend in some cases what are
Speaker 2: called headmates in other circles, or the detailed thought form
Speaker 2: of a desired Wi Fu my Little Pony character on Reddit.
Speaker 2: I'm thinking, though, that it could be used just as
Speaker 2: accurately to describe much much more. I happen to be
Speaker 2: of the persuasion that the body and brain are template
Speaker 2: vessels like radio receivers, each with a specific range of
Speaker 2: frequencies or in biological terms, each with genetic strengths, weaknesses,
Speaker 2: and traits to that particularular vessel. It seems to me
Speaker 2: that the body and brain then are influenced at least
Speaker 2: to some degree by the soul who is in possession
Speaker 2: of the receiver, and therefore it's timelines at any given moment.
Speaker 2: Perhaps in reflection of this, recently, the common culture has
Speaker 2: begun to shift and the newer generation of tolbamancers, headmat
Speaker 2: has and drifty day dreamers have come up with a
Speaker 2: new alternative vocabulary for specificity in tulpa type. We've got peragenic,
Speaker 2: which apparently arises from, or is caused by, or influenced
Speaker 2: by maadd which is maladaptive day dreaming. More on that later.
Speaker 2: Periogenic a headmat system made up of walkins. More on
Speaker 2: that later as well. Protogenic a system in one body
Speaker 2: that has existed since birth were for as long as
Speaker 2: they can remember, and perogenic refers to a system or
Speaker 2: headmats that were created using thought based or metaphysical means,
Speaker 2: usually deliberately meaning internally contained. More classic toulpus as for
Speaker 2: the more formal, spiritual and or psychological side of modern
Speaker 2: day Tulpa and tulpa esque conditions, practices, beliefs, and disorders.
Speaker 2: Based on my experiences, studies, and current understanding, I've made
Speaker 2: us an Iceberg style graphic to die. I've more fully
Speaker 2: into the layers of them all. Here's where it gets
Speaker 2: pretty heavy. There are a lot of shorthand substitutes for
Speaker 2: DSM disorder names, and if you're not aware of them all,
Speaker 2: I do encourage you to look them up on your own.
Speaker 2: To explain each diagnosis would turn this video easily into
Speaker 2: a two hour run. Character longing is the first layer.
Speaker 2: This is when a person so loves the idea, appearance,
Speaker 2: or any other aspect of a fictional character that they
Speaker 2: form the idea of the character solidly enough in their
Speaker 2: mind that it seems to become a real person to
Speaker 2: the dreamer. But the dreamer knows that the character or
Speaker 2: person in their mind and any fantasies, scenarios, et cetera,
Speaker 2: are all fictional and that they are in control of
Speaker 2: every detail. Moving on, we have my biological rotational acquisition theory,
Speaker 2: and this is somewhat related to some of the symptoms
Speaker 2: of dissociative identity disorder. If you know much of that
Speaker 2: there was a psych pro that I came across several
Speaker 2: years ago. She was talking about quote Did also being
Speaker 2: possibly a genetic quantum brain setting more ability, a body
Speaker 2: and brain with more flexible and permeable boundaries around which
Speaker 2: spirit and soul hold them, and that these people are
Speaker 2: being mislabeled as Did because no other understanding or term
Speaker 2: exists for it professionally. Yet I cannot, for the life
Speaker 2: of me find her name or remember who she is.
Speaker 2: So if you do know who she is, please do share,
Speaker 2: and I will put the information right here. Essentially because
Speaker 2: of her own work and research on this, she said
Speaker 2: that she believes that there is a portion of the
Speaker 2: population who have a main personality or ego like most
Speaker 2: human beings, who have not had or seemingly had severe
Speaker 2: trauma in childhood, but that they are prone to possession
Speaker 2: and not demonic possession where the victim is viewing vomit
Speaker 2: and the head is spinning a la Reagan in the
Speaker 2: original Exorcist movie.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 2: She said that she believes that there is a group
Speaker 2: of spirits or so that share the body from the
Speaker 2: non corporeal quantum side of life, and who come here
Speaker 2: to experience and or achieve certain goals. I agree with her.
Speaker 2: I call the action of organic switching between bodyholders rotational acquisition,
Speaker 2: and the full genetic condition of it biological rotational acquisition theory,
Speaker 2: which I consider a rare form of inherited external quantum possession,
Speaker 2: wherein the main current incarnate human personality has no memory
Speaker 2: of any possession or switching, but experience is missing time
Speaker 2: among other high strangeness, and the person does not have
Speaker 2: any other symptoms otherwise is diagnosed with or suspected of
Speaker 2: having or having features of DD, NPD, ASPD, BPD, CPTSD, PTSD, MAA,
Speaker 2: d D, schizophrenia, schizo effective or related features or disorders, depression,
Speaker 2: bipolar of any kind add ADHD, a history or current
Speaker 2: drug use or dependence, or any of such for alcoholism, mania, trauma,
Speaker 2: and or moderate to severe anxiety disorders OCD, and no
Speaker 2: immediate family history of them. From my time in providing
Speaker 2: care in a multitude of ways pun intended and my
Speaker 2: years of professional clinical studies on site at a severe
Speaker 2: trauma recovery clinic, I've come to note that females, when
Speaker 2: compared to male peers, are much more likely to develop
Speaker 2: did M, ADD, BPD, and have a far higher likelihood
Speaker 2: of being born to a body that operates on the
Speaker 2: basis of rotational acquisition as its genetic default. I also
Speaker 2: believe that certain children were bred in the old cultures
Speaker 2: so Phoenician, Mayan Egyptian, because this was understood and exploited
Speaker 2: in order to provide appropriate vessels for the gods to
Speaker 2: inhabit within the physical world. This is still going on
Speaker 2: today with the Dalai Lama reincarnation beliefs and practices. It's
Speaker 2: just pitched differently to the public. In handling the few
Speaker 2: cases of brat that I have over the years, I
Speaker 2: found that these people benefit greatly from learning and practicing
Speaker 2: daily grounding techniques and setting up mindfulness as a way
Speaker 2: of life in every moment, abstaining from even occasional alcohol,
Speaker 2: tobacco use, or drugs, especially drugs that have psychoactive effects,
Speaker 2: and setting intentional energetic boundaries by claiming the body as
Speaker 2: one's own and therefore the life as one's own regularly
Speaker 2: and with passion. The other souls. In every case I've
Speaker 2: seen of breat few as they are have respectfully vacated,
Speaker 2: and this is if the person wants to be fully
Speaker 2: here all the time, some do not because they are
Speaker 2: sharing their body and with highly responsible, beneficial other souls
Speaker 2: and gain a great deal by allowing shared access. I
Speaker 2: don't judge either way. In these cases, the system is
Speaker 2: a positive, well oiled, respectful, healthy machine with no mental illness,
Speaker 2: drug or alcohol use, or addiction, abuse, or neglect, where
Speaker 2: everyone is working on a shared schedule and all are
Speaker 2: benefiting from the efforts, lives, contributions, and talents of everyone
Speaker 2: else who shares the vessel. Who am I to object?
Speaker 2: Madd or maladaptive daydreaming is next. This is a mental
Speaker 2: condition which is classified as a response to stress and
Speaker 2: or trauma in one's life, and the main symptom is
Speaker 2: that of an extremely detailed inner world in which the
Speaker 2: person spends enough time that the rest of their life, responsibilities,
Speaker 2: and relationships are largely directly and negatively affected. People with
Speaker 2: this condition tend to have overlapping symptoms with CPTSD, PTSD,
Speaker 2: bpd DD, and other symptoms and diagnoses that are usually
Speaker 2: based on extreme trauma, though some of these factors may
Speaker 2: indeed be genetic in nature. Instead. Some with maadd cannot
Speaker 2: stop themselves from indulging in the daydreaming. I believe It
Speaker 2: is important to note that although MADD is typically part
Speaker 2: of many severe trauma and stress responses, MADD can and
Speaker 2: sometimes does seem to have other causes at times, and
Speaker 2: I support the notion and the mental health care community
Speaker 2: lately that it should have its own classification outside of
Speaker 2: its role and connection with larger trauma response conditions. Next,
Speaker 2: we have the walkins. The idea behind a walk in
Speaker 2: is generally that a lifetime was too difficult for the
Speaker 2: original soul and the new soul replaced the old soul
Speaker 2: in a contractual surrender, or that someone had a near
Speaker 2: death experience and for whatever reason came back different aka
Speaker 2: as a whole new person because the original soul vacated
Speaker 2: and another took full control and responsibility for the life
Speaker 2: and the body. People sometimes report that their friend, family member,
Speaker 2: or whomever came back as a totally different personality after
Speaker 2: a near death experience. Is it indeed because they are
Speaker 2: a different person a different soul, or is it only
Speaker 2: because of biological changes such as brain chemistry, brain activity, or,
Speaker 2: as I contend, is it both at the same time.
Speaker 2: Dissociative identity disorder used to be called MPD or multiple
Speaker 2: personality disorder. This is typically classed as an extreme trauma
Speaker 2: response to unbearable childhood abuse, neglect, or chaos. It is
Speaker 2: also said to be a result of ritual abuse, such
Speaker 2: as with government programs like MK Ultra. The typical media
Speaker 2: portrayal of DID is in movies such as American Ultra,
Speaker 2: where there are certain planned trigger words, phrases, images, places,
Speaker 2: or noises that cause the person with DD to switch
Speaker 2: dramatically to a desired alternate personality or alter. But I
Speaker 2: suspect that this type of DD is rather rare, as
Speaker 2: the planning and planting that would need to go into
Speaker 2: this class of developed purposeful person with DD aka system
Speaker 2: would be immense and immaculate. A much better, more accurate
Speaker 2: media depiction of DD would be in the recent show
Speaker 2: Moon Night. It may also somewhat get into Braat territory.
Speaker 2: For reference, Fritz Springmeyer wrote a handbook on this, and
Speaker 2: there is even an old Egyptian manuscript on the creation
Speaker 2: of such a slave as well. In most of real
Speaker 2: life in the wild, as the kids say today, trauma
Speaker 2: BASEDDD is nearly undetectable and unplanned. The switches between altars
Speaker 2: are subtle, and the differences between the altars to anyone
Speaker 2: on the outside, are almost entirely unnoticed. After all, it
Speaker 2: is a trauma response whose sole purpose is to help
Speaker 2: the person survive complete chaos. The current neurological and psychological
Speaker 2: theories as I'm understanding them, are that the brain has
Speaker 2: responded to harsh childhood abuse and neglect by walling off
Speaker 2: portions of the developing full personality, its memories, trauma, likes, dislikes,
Speaker 2: and even physical responses and interpretations of allergies and others stimuli.
Speaker 2: Some studies have shown that one altar may be allergic to, say, peanuts,
Speaker 2: and maybe going into a deadly allergic reaction, but switching
Speaker 2: to another altar clears up the reaction within minutes. Different
Speaker 2: altars also have different brain wave patterns and states of being. Apparently,
Speaker 2: I do suspect that disembodied God's goddesses and other types
Speaker 2: of non corporeal souls can also hop into someone with
Speaker 2: the ID for a spin, since the ID is after all,
Speaker 2: the complete erosion and lack of all boundaries internally and
Speaker 2: boundary deficiency is a main cause of many lifetime determining experiences.
Speaker 2: I believe this next level on the iceberg is the
Speaker 2: idea that God and gods are told us that human
Speaker 2: beings were so lonely and afraid of death that they
Speaker 2: imagined benevolent creator beings. I think that that is enough said.
Speaker 2: On this, schizophrenia begins our deepest descent. The general understanding
Speaker 2: of schizophrenia is that it differs from DD and MADD
Speaker 2: et cetera by being a complete separation from this reality,
Speaker 2: complete with voices being physically heard by the person, delusions
Speaker 2: and other severe hallucinations, plus and inability to function in
Speaker 2: life without medication due to the accompanying mania, depression, and
Speaker 2: disruption to nutritional and bodily needs, sleep, et cetera being met,
Speaker 2: and the fact that the fulfillment of responsibilities and relationships
Speaker 2: are all being completely obliterated. Recent research shows that it
Speaker 2: is genetic and brain based, with a telltale sign being
Speaker 2: that the eyes track, focus and function very differently than
Speaker 2: someone who does not have schizophrenia. Until better neurological therapies
Speaker 2: or complete cures are made or discovered, schizophrenia and its
Speaker 2: sibling disorders require a treatment plan of permanent, careful, professionally
Speaker 2: supervised lifestyle management combined with psychoactive prescription drugs designed specifically
Speaker 2: for the management of schizophrenia and its symptoms. Negative possession
Speaker 2: is our second to last stop. Negative possession is essentially
Speaker 2: the opposite of biological rotational acquisition. In negative possession, a
Speaker 2: person is being tormented from an external source by beings
Speaker 2: that people today would call demons, hostile aliens, or spiritual, emotional,
Speaker 2: or energetic parasites. These may be present with the person
Speaker 2: since birth, as they may be haunting a particular family line,
Speaker 2: or they may develop an attachment that turns into a
Speaker 2: split style possession over time, where the original personality is
Speaker 2: present and aware while the negative entity tortures the body,
Speaker 2: the original personality and others in the area. This is
Speaker 2: more of the classical demonic oppression and possession idea. Interestingly enough,
Speaker 2: there is a man named Jerry Marzinski who insists that
Speaker 2: schizophrenics aren't insane, but are really being tormented by non
Speaker 2: human intelligences and entities. I concur somewhat. I believe that
Speaker 2: there are genetically schizophrenic people, and that there are people
Speaker 2: out there who are diagnosed as schizophrenic, but who are
Speaker 2: indeed suffering from severe susceptibility to entity interference because of
Speaker 2: poor or no oric lifestyle, health and or vibrational boundaries,
Speaker 2: putting them on the same wavelength and within easy grasp
Speaker 2: of the parasite or parasites. Jerry still does in depth
Speaker 2: interviews on the subject, and I would highly recommend hearing
Speaker 2: him out. For people with this torment, I have found
Speaker 2: that a complete gutting of their lives is the only solution,
Speaker 2: where everything is torn down and built entirely from scratch.
Speaker 2: The bottom tip of our iceberg belongs to the Sophie's
Speaker 2: World theory. As I have said many times before, this
Speaker 2: book haunts me, and according to the Internet, haunts many
Speaker 2: many others to this day. It also has inspired this
Speaker 2: deepest part of the iceberg.
Speaker 1: What if none of us are real? What if we
Speaker 1: are all told us fictional characters in someone else's book,
Speaker 1: and some of us have been programmed or written to
Speaker 1: at some point gain sentience about this reality. But is
Speaker 1: that truly sentience?
Speaker 3: Then?
Speaker 1: What if ignorance really is bliss? This is where I
Speaker 1: defend and rather admire the human experience. The typical human
Speaker 1: lifetime experience mandates that one body has one soul and
Speaker 1: one personality or ego, and that's what human being is,
Speaker 1: who it is. They each live one lifetime, predictable, stable,
Speaker 1: full of emotion. Because they're caught up in the story
Speaker 1: that they tell themselves, their brains and their bodies filter
Speaker 1: out almost everything except their one physical reality. I believe
Speaker 1: that outside of the healthy, whole, intact incarnate human ego experience,
Speaker 1: the ego style for other types of people's is more
Speaker 1: like a kaleidoscope or a cracked mirror, with the whole
Speaker 1: containing many near fractal mini egos, and that though they
Speaker 1: are extremely magically talented wise and require much less for
Speaker 1: their survival, I think that they may be bored and
Speaker 1: or need human beings to stay entertained, engaged, mentally healthy,
Speaker 1: and or maybe other factors too, and that this is
Speaker 1: why we have seemingly one god, goddess race or phenomenon
Speaker 1: taking on many faces, names, and appearances in order to
Speaker 1: interact with humankind over the ages, including what religious people
Speaker 1: call angels. Biblically accurate angels are rarely acknowledged, it seems,
Speaker 1: and nonetheless I do believe that they should be for
Speaker 1: many reasons. If it's been a while since you've enjoyed
Speaker 1: yourself a sleepless night spent in acute fear, I suggest
Speaker 1: looking up encounters with illustrations and descriptions of biblically accurate angels,
Speaker 1: it may become readily apparent why they were said to
Speaker 1: approach human people with the now famous motto do not
Speaker 1: be afraid. What if my little pony and biblical angels
Speaker 1: are just an example of two opposite sides of the
Speaker 1: same coin. What if they are both originally just soothing
Speaker 1: concepts that human beings made up and then eventually became
Speaker 1: culturally real and then at last transcended those limits because
Speaker 1: enough energy was put into them. And what if we
Speaker 1: are the same as them, brought to life whatever that
Speaker 1: may be, in the very same manner. What makes someone
Speaker 1: or something real? What makes someone or something alive?
Speaker 2: Sentient? What makes someone or something.
Speaker 3: Real?
Speaker 1: Makes a person who they are? Is it brain, chemistry, soul, spirit, memories, preferences,
Speaker 1: all of that, some of it, none of it, something
Speaker 1: completely different? What if egolessness or nearly so and creativity
Speaker 1: are at the heart of some non human peoples and
Speaker 1: ultimately of God. If you were this way, wouldn't you
Speaker 1: want to take a break and immerse yourself in a
Speaker 1: solid story experience too? Sometimes, if you have ever played
Speaker 1: Super Smash, Brothers Melee. You might remember the game ending.
Speaker 1: It's highly relevant to my point here. My suggestion is
Speaker 1: to have fun, live a life of your choosing as
Speaker 1: much as possible. Why not have fun, treat this life
Speaker 1: as you please, and go with the flow. Between three
Speaker 1: of us on the battlefield today, who won.
Speaker 4: Sudden clatt st st stop st.
Speaker 3: Bunco stock bass, that's.
Speaker 4: That's stun stout bout BT. And thought about