Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Capla Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. Prayers please where
Speaker 1: everybody in Florida, as it's about to make landfall. Make
Speaker 1: landfall during this next hour on The Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 1: Obviously a couple of hours later back there in Florida,
Speaker 1: so we'll keep you posted on Milton eight five to
Speaker 1: five for zero five A two five five text d
Speaker 1: A N five seven seven three nine. Theme of the
Speaker 1: day is great young conservative talent and our next guest
Speaker 1: it can self define. But we had Gabe Evans with
Speaker 1: us at four thirty six, pick it off the pod,
Speaker 1: who was a plus. It was like a jd Vance
Speaker 1: like performance last night against Jadiro Caraveo on TV and
Speaker 1: at times Kyle Clark. At times it was two on one.
Speaker 1: But Kyle Clark, to his credit, you know, did a
Speaker 1: very very effective riff with Caravail where he went through, Hey,
Speaker 1: before you voted this way and you said you believed X,
Speaker 1: and now you say believe the opposite why and it
Speaker 1: was a very effective riff. But Brittany Vesley is with us.
Speaker 1: She's executive director Colorado Catholic Conference. And I don't care
Speaker 1: if you're Catholic, another type of Christian, no religion at all.
Speaker 1: She's fighting for something that's just a matter of basic
Speaker 1: human rights and decency, which is, hey, we shouldn't put
Speaker 1: in phantaside in our constitution. And it goes beyond that.
Speaker 1: We're talking about the insidious Amendment seventy nine. And Brittany,
Speaker 1: you had your own debate last night, and I respect
Speaker 1: everybody who gets in the area to tell people about that.
Speaker 2: And thanks for having me on Dan.
Speaker 1: Sure.
Speaker 2: So last night we had a Denver Decide debate on
Speaker 2: Amendment seventy nine, which is the constitutional right to abortion
Speaker 2: amendment that does a lot of terrible things that we
Speaker 2: can discuss. But it was against COBALT's representative, Danny Newsom,
Speaker 2: who's a former ACLU attorney in a staunch progressive and
Speaker 2: a very ardent proponent of abortion access.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and listen, I've known Danny forever. I like Danny
Speaker 1: a lot. We're on opposite sides almost everything, including this.
Speaker 1: But she's she's going to be a very formidable opponent.
Speaker 1: Now she's trying to defend the indefensible, and she's up
Speaker 1: against somebody incredibly formidable in you. But let me play
Speaker 1: this clip. This is a clip Ryan pulled newsom It
Speaker 1: says saying abortion is healthcare? Why would you have a restriction?
Speaker 1: And then get your reaction.
Speaker 3: To that the common sense restrictions that you are talking about.
Speaker 3: Abortion is health care? Why would you have a restriction pregnancy?
Speaker 3: Every pregnancy is different, Every pregnant person is different. You
Speaker 3: don't know when something is going to wrong with the pregnancy.
Speaker 3: You don't know how something is going to go wrong
Speaker 3: with the pregnancy. Medical care must be provided.
Speaker 1: Yes, so abortion is healthcare like kidnapping his childcare? I mean,
Speaker 1: how do you respond to that?
Speaker 4: Thank you?
Speaker 1: Dan?
Speaker 2: So there are two arguments that Danny was really trying
Speaker 2: to get me to bite on that would run along
Speaker 2: the traditional pro life and religious lines of argumentation. I
Speaker 2: think she just wasn't ready for what our campaign has
Speaker 2: prepared for the main arguments against Amendment seventy nine that
Speaker 2: this eliminates parental notifications, some minors.
Speaker 4: Can be coercion to abortions.
Speaker 2: It allows for a direct taxpayer stream of funding for
Speaker 2: abortion millions of dollars come January with this new legislature
Speaker 2: coming in. And it also allows for abortion on healthy
Speaker 2: mothers and healthy babies without any type of restriction. And
Speaker 2: this was interesting where I pressed Danny on that last
Speaker 2: one on abortion for health others for all nine months
Speaker 2: and she kept it was very fun to keep going
Speaker 2: back to the parental notification and made her go a
Speaker 2: little crazy, I think, But she couldn't defend the fact
Speaker 2: that her one on one side, she's making the argument
Speaker 2: abortion is healthcare and there should be no restrictions or
Speaker 2: regulations on abortion, and then the other side he saying,
Speaker 2: oh wait, this doesn't affect PRINCH notification. Oh wait, this
Speaker 2: means that she would you would actu you wouldn't engage this.
Speaker 2: That abortion clinics have no regulations comparable to other surgical
Speaker 2: institutions like hospitals. So when there's a woman who's an
Speaker 2: emergency emergency situation in an abortion clinic, she's bleeding out heavily,
Speaker 2: there are zero regulations from the state because that is
Speaker 2: considered a regulation upon a right to abortion. Danny couldn't
Speaker 2: answer that because on one side of her mouth she
Speaker 2: was saying no, you can't regulate a quote unquote fundamental
Speaker 2: right to abortion because abortion is healthcare. And then the
Speaker 2: other side she says, oh wait, no, no, abortion is healthcare,
Speaker 2: and parental notification stays that has nothing to do with that.
Speaker 2: She just couldn't she couldn't wed those two together because
Speaker 2: they are not able to be connected.
Speaker 1: Well, just another way that the pro abortion industry is
Speaker 1: an anti woman, starting with the fact that they kill
Speaker 1: over five hundred thousand females a year before birth. Let's
Speaker 1: start with that. But yeah, you know, trying to put
Speaker 1: this in the constitution where it's going to block any
Speaker 1: kind of restrictions as the ones you describe as I
Speaker 1: understand it, Britney vestly. But let's go back to the
Speaker 1: point you're making a second to go and tell us
Speaker 1: more about when, and we're going to be playing sound
Speaker 1: from that debate throughout the week and beyond because it's
Speaker 1: so instructive. But when you're trying to pin Danny down
Speaker 1: the way that Trump was trying to pin Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: down and Vance was trying to pin down Walls, trying
Speaker 1: to pin him down on the fact that wait a second,
Speaker 1: you you democrats, you want it legal to kill a
Speaker 1: healthy baby with a healthy mother, to kill that baby
Speaker 1: just seconds before that baby is delivered. They always want
Speaker 1: to try and lie and deny that that's right.
Speaker 2: So we were allowed to ask three questions of each
Speaker 2: other during the debate, and the third question was a
Speaker 2: point to this. I said that the color Apartment of
Speaker 2: Health's own data shows that four percent of abortions in
Speaker 2: Colorado happened after twenty two weeks. And the Boulder abortionist
Speaker 2: doctor Hearn, has stated that he conducts about three hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty late abortions on healthy mothers with healthy babies
Speaker 2: each year. That's about one per day. And after you
Speaker 2: support late abortion on healthy mothers and healthy babies, when
Speaker 2: a baby feels panic can survive.
Speaker 4: Outside the women. Her response was that was a trope.
Speaker 2: And I actually really love somebody to set this that
Speaker 2: debate at seven fifty five, this is what it is.
Speaker 4: She goes on to say.
Speaker 2: Doctor her needs to retire because he's an outlier, and
Speaker 2: she tries to say something about fire that the pro
Speaker 2: life side firebombs abortion clinics, so we.
Speaker 4: Have no room to talk about outlier lord like Warren Hearn.
Speaker 2: So I thought that was a terrible response by Danny Newsomb,
Speaker 2: especially because later on in the debate I bring it
Speaker 2: back again to remind her. She makes a comment that
Speaker 2: not actually one percent and it late abortion on healthy
Speaker 2: mothers and healthy.
Speaker 4: Baby that do not happen.
Speaker 2: But the data out of our own Department of Health
Speaker 2: says it's four percent and it does happen. And Gutmocker
Speaker 2: says that's underrepresented. And by the way, there are several
Speaker 2: other late abortionists in the state of Colorado, including one
Speaker 2: very young abortionist he just moved to Colorado, doctor Bennett Langren,
Speaker 2: who brags about not stigmatizing late abortion on saying that
Speaker 2: they're only fetal anomalies. He makes it very clear this
Speaker 2: is healthy mother's, healthy babies that he connects abortion on.
Speaker 2: So that is a complete falsehood that Danny was trying
Speaker 2: backpeddling a lot.
Speaker 4: He's really trying to recover. He even made a comment let.
Speaker 2: The Reproductive Health Equity Act doesn't allow for late abortionsers
Speaker 2: and health but also fall this is the problem nationally.
Speaker 2: This is the problem with Danny's argument too, that the
Speaker 2: other side, cobaltson Planned Parenthoods are the two biggest pro
Speaker 2: abortion lobbyists in the state of Colorado, the biggest funding
Speaker 2: and they can't answer the question of how many abortions
Speaker 2: happen on late my with healthy baby happens on healthy
Speaker 2: mothers with healthy babies in the late term of pregnancy,
Speaker 2: because it's indefensible.
Speaker 1: Well, it's an admission that you're right, it's an admission
Speaker 1: that every abortion takes an innocent human life. And they
Speaker 1: know this, right, Brittany, they know that if they admit
Speaker 1: the truth that wait a second, note that they want
Speaker 1: this in the constitution, that you can kill a healthy
Speaker 1: baby at nine months, just seconds before it's delivered. They
Speaker 1: want that in the constitution, a healthy baby, healthy mother.
Speaker 1: Then at that point people are going to change their
Speaker 1: view of whoever's making that argument, whether it's Dannie, whether
Speaker 1: it's Waltz, whether it's Harris, whether it's Polis, and they're
Speaker 1: going to view them as monstrous. That's why they won't
Speaker 1: admit the truth, in my opinion, And then beyond that,
Speaker 1: once they concede that, oh yeah, there's no doubt that
Speaker 1: baby who's just seconds away from being born is a
Speaker 1: human entitled to protection, then they have to acknowledge it's
Speaker 1: a human all along, just at a different stage.
Speaker 4: Exactly.
Speaker 2: The other argument Danny really tried to keep going back
Speaker 2: to is also very similar to what we're seeing on
Speaker 2: the national level.
Speaker 4: It's, oh, if we don't do this, if we.
Speaker 2: Don't quote unquote safeguard, are right, we are going to
Speaker 2: have a ban. We're going to have a ban in Colorado,
Speaker 2: which is completely laughable considering the political climates in our
Speaker 2: state right now and the ouse that are statutorily on
Speaker 2: the books. Now, what this, what this amendment does is
Speaker 2: go far beyond the Reproductive Healtic Equity Act, way beyond
Speaker 2: Roe v. Wade, and it will remove any common sense
Speaker 2: safeguard to abortion, including parental notification for minors being coerced
Speaker 2: into abortion, including the millions of dollars that our taxpayer
Speaker 2: dollars will have to go to late abortion on healthy
Speaker 2: dollars and healthy babies, even for out of state women
Speaker 2: if this thing gets passed, because our very progressive legislature
Speaker 2: will come back and allocate that funding. So sure, Danny,
Speaker 2: it doesn't have a fiscal note right now, but in
Speaker 2: two months, it definitely will when when our tax dollars
Speaker 2: are going to be going to abortion for millions of.
Speaker 1: Eighties and Brittany will have you back often and others
Speaker 1: back often to talk about different aspects, including doing away
Speaker 1: with parental notification and now taxpayers are going to have
Speaker 1: to pay for this in fantaside they want in the constitution.
Speaker 1: But tell people how they can help the campaign.
Speaker 4: Yes, thank you Dan.
Speaker 2: So our campaign is called Right to Note Colorado because
Speaker 2: ColorOS have a right to know what is.
Speaker 4: In this horrific self.
Speaker 2: So you can see more information at www. Write our
Speaker 2: idht do o pynow dot co dot com, Right to
Speaker 2: Note ceo dot com and learn more, but also support
Speaker 2: the campaign because we have a lot of things that
Speaker 2: we need in order, but we really need to have
Speaker 2: more support from our broader community to get that message
Speaker 2: out the horrific amendment.
Speaker 1: Amen, and we'll be playing sound from that great debate
Speaker 1: performance by you last night for a weeks to come.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Brittany, look forward to the next one.
Speaker 4: Thank you, Dan.
Speaker 1: Take care. That's Brittany Vesli, Colorado Catholic Conference. And the
Speaker 1: opposition to seventy nine goes way beyond Catholics, way beyond
Speaker 1: christian It's just basically anybody you know who's just sensible
Speaker 1: and supports decency. You're on the Dan Kapla Show, And.
Speaker 5: Now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 6: Well that is happening. We have some new CNN reporting
Speaker 6: today about what is going on behind the scenes inside
Speaker 6: the Harris campaign and more broadly among Democrats who are
Speaker 6: growing more and more anxious about a twenty sixteen redoct.
Speaker 1: Cnaw, this is going to be so great list anything
Speaker 1: that happened, right, But isn't it exactly what I said
Speaker 1: it would be? And I've been saying so for months.
Speaker 1: We're twenty seven days out, right? Is that the right math?
Speaker 1: About twenty seven days out? And she's lost momentum. The
Speaker 1: worm is turned. She's dropping, not like a rock, but
Speaker 1: she you don't have to drop like a rock in
Speaker 1: a race like this. She is dropping, and Trump is rising.
Speaker 1: The American people are figuring her out. And here's the problem.
Speaker 1: She's still got twenty seven more days for Trump to
Speaker 1: educate the people in the Swing States about who she
Speaker 1: really is. And it's all in her own words on video,
Speaker 1: coming right out of her mouth. And I'm telling you
Speaker 1: right now, Ryan that the single most powerful spot we've
Speaker 1: seen in the last thirty years is this spot that's
Speaker 1: on right now. And we've talked about it, so I
Speaker 1: won't beliebor it. But everybody's probably seen it now if
Speaker 1: you're watching football or sports or now it's running midday
Speaker 1: and Trump is raising more money right because because people
Speaker 1: are smelling the victory now, so they want to get
Speaker 1: on the right side of the winter. And so he's
Speaker 1: blanketing America with this spot. Everybody's going to see it
Speaker 1: multiple times by election day, and it cuts through all
Speaker 1: the noise, right this spot where in her own words,
Speaker 1: she says she wants to take your hard earned taxpayer
Speaker 1: dollars and use it so illegal immigrate inmates can get
Speaker 1: sex change operations. That goes far beyond the issue. It
Speaker 1: just tells people so everything they need to know.
Speaker 7: About her and convicted felons like murderers, transgenders in prison. No,
Speaker 7: we're going to pay for your sex change surgery?
Speaker 5: How about No?
Speaker 7: And there's another one that she cut for him, Dan
Speaker 7: and that sunny hastin exchange she had man. She couldn't
Speaker 7: think of anything that she would do differently than Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so no, it is shaping up beautifully. But
Speaker 1: my question for you, and we'll go to the phone
Speaker 1: lines now and text as well. Is Okay, we saw
Speaker 1: what the left did before when my prediction came true
Speaker 1: and it was clear Biden was going to lose. And
Speaker 1: I still want to know who issued those that letter.
Speaker 1: Clearly it was not Joe Biden that letter saying he
Speaker 1: was withdrawing his nominee. But yeah, this backroom deal dead
Speaker 1: of night. They stripped the democratically elected nominee of that
Speaker 1: position and inserted somebody else. What do they do now?
Speaker 1: What do they do now? Because they can't replace Harris.
Speaker 1: They could replace Walls, and they may try to do
Speaker 1: that with Shapiro, But what do they do now? Down
Speaker 1: the stretch? What do you see coming? Millennial Mike, You're
Speaker 1: on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 4: Welcome, Hey Dan, good to be with you. Can you
Speaker 4: hear me?
Speaker 1: Okay, I can hear you now? Trademark that please?
Speaker 4: Perfect? Perfect? So what I was going to talk about
Speaker 4: in great interviews, By the way, I love Gabe and
Speaker 4: your other guests. They were both fantastic, but absolutely so
Speaker 4: what I was going to talk about. Kamala Harris today
Speaker 4: on the Howard Stern Show said she told Stern that
Speaker 4: talking to him was kind of a form of therapy,
Speaker 4: then offered a bit of self reflection about those she
Speaker 4: does not engage with. She said, she said, I choose
Speaker 4: not to have mean people in my life. And why
Speaker 4: I think this is so telling is because whenever there's
Speaker 4: a reporter that asked her a serious, challenging question, she
Speaker 4: dances around it, she avoids it. And it's these little
Speaker 4: tells that are really important. And you know what Ryan
Speaker 4: was just talking about. Also with the View, when they
Speaker 4: asked her, you know, what do you disagree with Trump on?
Speaker 4: She said, nothing that comes to mind? Well, why not Afghanistan?
Speaker 4: What about the withdrawal? But you know, she's not reaching
Speaker 4: any independent voters by you know, not acknowledging the faults
Speaker 4: of Biden. That's one of the only ways I think
Speaker 4: she could reach Oh, absolutely not. I think that a
Speaker 4: lot of the Democrats are so delusional. She thinks that
Speaker 4: she's They think that she is going to win, that
Speaker 4: she's going to be this transformative, you know, revolutionary candidate.
Speaker 4: And I don't get it personally, but I just how
Speaker 4: is it that it's as close as it is right now? Dan?
Speaker 4: That's my question. I mean, are there that many low
Speaker 4: IQ voters out there that the mainstream media is convincing
Speaker 4: that Kamala is this, you know, monumental. You know, Obama, what.
Speaker 1: A great question you ask, Mike, what a great question.
Speaker 1: What I'd start with, I'm interested in your take. What
Speaker 1: I'd start with is, listen, it's it's a very polarized
Speaker 1: country politically to begin with, and because of abortion, it's
Speaker 1: a very polarized country in general. So under the best circumstances,
Speaker 1: these are going to be close races, right and so,
Speaker 1: but then you take it a step beyond that, and
Speaker 1: you have the horrific dishonest in so many ways vilification
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump and all these false allegations against Trump,
Speaker 1: and he's a trader, Russia collusion, all this, and every
Speaker 1: now and then he's made a mistake that adds to that.
Speaker 1: But so much of this dishonesty about Trump and coordinated
Speaker 1: media attempt to politically end him, And so that helps
Speaker 1: explain why it still remains relatively close. Then the other piece,
Speaker 1: and hey, we're brutally honest on this show. You know,
Speaker 1: the other piece is President Trump, like any human, had
Speaker 1: some missteps, but certainly you know that some of the
Speaker 1: stuff we've talked about on the show, he did not
Speaker 1: Inside violence on January sixth, not in any way, shape
Speaker 1: or form. But he could have responded better and sooner,
Speaker 1: and he didn't, and that was a mistake. So you know,
Speaker 1: these things pile up together, almost all of them unfair
Speaker 1: to our Trump, some self inflicted. And that's why I
Speaker 1: think it's still close. But Mike, what we see now
Speaker 1: is what we've seen in sixteen and twenty. Right. Trump
Speaker 1: is a great closer. And when we get the A Trump,
Speaker 1: nobody's beating the A Trump. And right now we've got
Speaker 1: the A Trump and it's on display every day. That
Speaker 1: great decision of his right, Mike, to not do a
Speaker 1: third debate because it's not going to be a fair fight.
Speaker 1: He's not going to have a fair chance, and he
Speaker 1: doesn't need it. He's ahead the great decision not to
Speaker 1: do sixty minutes because they wouldn't be fair to him
Speaker 1: in the way they question, the way they edit, the
Speaker 1: way they represent it. Look at the way you've seen it, Mike.
Speaker 1: They are falsely editing Kamala Harris's interview with them to
Speaker 1: make it sound like she's coherent, when earlier they ran
Speaker 1: versions of the same statement showing she wasn't. Yeah, so
Speaker 1: I think he's going to pull away. I think he's
Speaker 1: going to win by a comfortable margin.
Speaker 4: Yeah. I would also say very quick. I think a
Speaker 4: lot of the shows she is going on, I guess
Speaker 4: he went on this call her dad.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah podcast.
Speaker 4: It's like she's trying to appeal to younger voters. I
Speaker 4: get it, but I don't think the messages coming across
Speaker 4: effectively when she's focusing more on just her daily routines
Speaker 4: and things she does.
Speaker 1: Great point, I hope you call every day. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: we need to bail for news right now. But that
Speaker 1: goes to the question of has she given up here
Speaker 1: on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 5: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1: I think only a person that hates our country, actually
Speaker 1: maybe it's a down deep hatred can want open voters. Wow.
Speaker 1: So we took in more than twenty one about that
Speaker 1: for a second, and then President Trump documenting this success
Speaker 1: he had at the border. Think about that statement, and
Speaker 1: do you agree that only a person who hates America
Speaker 1: could want open borders? Love your take on that. How
Speaker 1: would anybody counter that argument? Eight five five four zero
Speaker 1: five eight two five to five the number? I don't
Speaker 1: know how anybody would counter that argument, And that's no
Speaker 1: reflection on people in general south of the border. It's
Speaker 1: no criticism of them. But it just comes back to
Speaker 1: the reality that if you open the border, you are deciding, deliberate, premeditated,
Speaker 1: that you're going to allow lots and lots of murderers, rapists,
Speaker 1: other types of criminals in to prey on Americans. Now
Speaker 1: that percentage, it may be that ninety ninety five, ninety eight,
Speaker 1: ninety nine percent of the people who come in through
Speaker 1: those open borders are not criminals, they're not rapists, they're
Speaker 1: not murderers, They're very good people who just want a
Speaker 1: better life. That doesn't mean we should have an open border.
Speaker 1: But even if it's just one percent, and the percentage
Speaker 1: is higher than one percent, even if it's just one
Speaker 1: percent who are vicious murderers, rapist other kinds of criminals,
Speaker 1: as President Trump wright, than anybody who makes a decision
Speaker 1: to open our border knowing that they're inviting that one
Speaker 1: percent or that two percenter, that three or four percent
Speaker 1: in to prey on the women of America, the children
Speaker 1: of America, the men of America, the communities of America. Yeah,
Speaker 1: do those folks just hate America. How could anybody who
Speaker 1: loves America make a conscious decision to just open the borders.
Speaker 1: And then we get to the other very high percentage
Speaker 1: of folks who come through open borders, who are just
Speaker 1: good people looking for a better life. It's still obviously
Speaker 1: not something America can handle. America can't handle those unrestricted numbers,
Speaker 1: that unrestricted flow, even if the people are really good people,
Speaker 1: as so many are, but not all. America can't handle that.
Speaker 1: We've seen it. We've seen it in Colorado, We've seen
Speaker 1: it all over the place. So is he right that
Speaker 1: people who just want truly open borders hate America? Eight
Speaker 1: five to five for zero five A two five five
Speaker 1: the number techs d A N five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: And listen to my personal belief whether or not I
Speaker 1: happen to be Catholic. You know, my personal belief is
Speaker 1: is wait a second, I believe I'm required as a
Speaker 1: Christian and a Catholic Christian to have a special kind
Speaker 1: of love, a special kind of support for immigrants, and
Speaker 1: I think that's a sacred obligation regardless of religion. I
Speaker 1: think it's absolutely the right thing to do. But that
Speaker 1: doesn't mean open borders. That doesn't mean unrestricted flow. That's
Speaker 1: that's bad for everybody. So yeah, I would really really
Speaker 1: like your take on that. Let's start with Carol in Denver, Colorado.
Speaker 1: You're on the Dan Kaplis.
Speaker 4: You'll welcome, Hi, Dan.
Speaker 1: Hey.
Speaker 8: My take on that is, I do agree with him,
Speaker 8: and I think when you love something dearly, you are
Speaker 8: very protective of it and you don't just you don't
Speaker 8: just throw it out to the wolves. I mean, and
Speaker 8: at the open borders, you know for a fact that
Speaker 8: you're letting in murderers or letting in drug addicts, drug pushers,
Speaker 8: sex traffickers, gang members, and that is not protecting something
Speaker 8: that you love.
Speaker 1: Well. I love your point, Carol. Kind of like your house.
Speaker 1: I mean, I love my family, and that's why locker doors,
Speaker 1: you know that, right? What would it say about my
Speaker 1: love for my family if I just left our doors
Speaker 1: open at night and let anybody you wanted to come
Speaker 1: wandering into the.
Speaker 8: House, and you would you would have some you know,
Speaker 8: parameters or requirements filters on who you would let in
Speaker 8: your home. And you can be a very generous, kind
Speaker 8: love person and say I want to help and I
Speaker 8: want to allow these people to come stay in my home,
Speaker 8: but you're not going to do it at the expense
Speaker 8: of your family members possibly being flaughtered or raped or
Speaker 8: you know, anything else like that. So it doesn't mean
Speaker 8: you're mean, it doesn't mean you're selfish. It just means
Speaker 8: you're being careful because you love your family, you love
Speaker 8: your home, and you want to do it selectively and responsibly.
Speaker 1: Yeah, beautifully said, beautifully said. Thank you for that, Carol.
Speaker 1: And it's the same in my view with immigrants with
Speaker 1: who want to come to this country. Listen, I consider
Speaker 1: myself a lottery winner because I was born in the
Speaker 1: United States of America. Any of us born in the
Speaker 1: United States of America, we are lottery winners. And this
Speaker 1: is just my personal worldview. But I look at others
Speaker 1: who didn't have that good fortune, and they just happened
Speaker 1: to be born on the other side of the border.
Speaker 1: I can love this country, which means controlling the border,
Speaker 1: because if you just leave it open, obviously you are
Speaker 1: knowingly inviting all sorts of bad things to happen in
Speaker 1: this country. But I can love this country and want
Speaker 1: that border controlled and still love the people on the
Speaker 1: other side of the border who want a better life
Speaker 1: and want to be here. You can do both at
Speaker 1: the same time, and you don't have to have an
Speaker 1: open border to accomplish that. You can have a sane
Speaker 1: immigration policy that gives folks who have not committed crimes
Speaker 1: in other countries a fair chance to get in here
Speaker 1: in a controlled way the country can handle, and that
Speaker 1: benefits this nation. And then you can do other things
Speaker 1: to help them in their lives on the other side
Speaker 1: of the border. You know, such as my wife and
Speaker 1: daughter and son who have made multiple trips down to Mexico,
Speaker 1: along with other really good people we know here in
Speaker 1: Colorado to care for desperately poor people outside of RS
Speaker 1: and I know that many many others listening can tell
Speaker 1: similar stories. You can send money, you can encourage political change,
Speaker 1: You can do both. You can love this country, which
Speaker 1: means controlled borders, and you can love the good people
Speaker 1: on the other side of the border. That is not hard.
Speaker 1: Eight five five forur zero five A two five five
Speaker 1: the number. We have so much hot sound, I don't
Speaker 1: know where to start. And since you were kind enough
Speaker 1: to join us today a quick recap, I don't think
Speaker 1: there's any real question now. And we played lots of
Speaker 1: sound of the left sounding the warning that Trump is
Speaker 1: starting to pull away, and as I predicted, and it's
Speaker 1: not a nothing is in life, right, but all indicators
Speaker 1: are starting to pull away. So I'd love to hear
Speaker 1: from you. What do you think the left does next?
Speaker 1: We saw what happened last time, right dead of night
Speaker 1: backroom deal depos a democratically elected nominee who happened to
Speaker 1: be a sitting president and replaced him with somebody else,
Speaker 1: totally on democratic process. So they'll stop at almost nothing.
Speaker 1: What do they do now that it appears clear and
Speaker 1: many many credibly sore stories that the left sees it
Speaker 1: now as well, that she is likely to lose and
Speaker 1: it's likely to get even worse, and those margins may
Speaker 1: well get big enough to win more GOP seats in
Speaker 1: the Senate, though that isn't certain yet, and to keep
Speaker 1: the GOP House and expand it. So what do you
Speaker 1: think the left does next? Texter says Dan. I believe
Speaker 1: Biden will resign, Harris becomes potus. DEM's believe that will
Speaker 1: give her momentum to put her over the finish line.
Speaker 1: Russ in Florence, Colorado, you know we've been talking about
Speaker 1: that for months now, Ryan, do you think Russ is right?
Speaker 1: I thought sorry to do that to you. Zach, A
Speaker 1: great young trainee is back there today. He's an up
Speaker 1: and comer, up and comer, a newcomer as well, Zach. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's new newer. Oh wonderful. But I was using that
Speaker 1: on board term in the Mike Johnson sense, and I
Speaker 1: always wonder Mayor Mike Johnson. This is Mayor Mike Johnston
Speaker 1: of Denver. Now, let's say somebody just comes uninvited through
Speaker 1: the back door of the mayor's house and please nobody
Speaker 1: do that. Nobody do that. But let's say somebody did.
Speaker 1: Would Mike Johnston call him newcomer?
Speaker 4: Hmm?
Speaker 1: It would technically be accurate based on his terminology. I
Speaker 1: hope nobody doesn't and we don't have to find out. No,
Speaker 1: but young Ryan, I just noticed. I better hit this brake.
Speaker 1: But I want to continue this with you after the break.
Speaker 1: I really want to get your take on this, because
Speaker 1: we've been talking about this for months. Okay, Yeah, they've
Speaker 1: got this card to play force Biden out, and they
Speaker 1: have the leverage to do it. And it's the same
Speaker 1: leverage that was able to strip him of the nomination
Speaker 1: and to put her in as president. But my thought was,
Speaker 1: and we'll get Ryan's take on this in years when
Speaker 1: we come back, wouldn't they have had to done that,
Speaker 1: do that a week or two ago. Isn't it too
Speaker 1: late right now for that to work for them? And
Speaker 1: what else do you think they'll do now that they
Speaker 1: can see it slipping away? Eight five to five hours
Speaker 1: five eight two five five text Dan five seven seven
Speaker 1: three nine.
Speaker 5: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Well that Da, that's a new.
Speaker 6: CNN reporting today about what is going on behind the
Speaker 6: scenes inside the Harris campaign and more broadly among Democrats
Speaker 6: who are growing more and more anxious about a twenty
Speaker 6: sixteen REDOC scene.
Speaker 1: Oh man, this is going to be so much fun
Speaker 1: to watch, right, That's one thing we're talking about right now.
Speaker 1: And nothing's guaranteed in life, right, But all of these indicators,
Speaker 1: not each and everyone, but almost all of these indicators
Speaker 1: pointing to Trump not only winning but starting to pull away,
Speaker 1: maybe taking more House and Senate seats with him. So,
Speaker 1: you know, it'd be one thing if we were like
Speaker 1: three or four days out from election day, but we're
Speaker 1: twenty seven days out. So what do you think the
Speaker 1: left does now, and we have a texture who talks
Speaker 1: about Okay, you know, after Trump wins, they're they're going
Speaker 1: to deny the legitimacy of the election. Well, you can
Speaker 1: bet on that. That's the starting point, right, We saw
Speaker 1: that in sixteen. But they do so at their own
Speaker 1: peril with the American people because remember, and I know
Speaker 1: you don't want to hear it now, but there are
Speaker 1: elections coming up in twenty six, really important elections in
Speaker 1: the twenty six races begin on November sixth. So Trump
Speaker 1: goes ahead and wins, as we expect at this point,
Speaker 1: he pulls away and then the Democrats want to question
Speaker 1: the legitimacy or go to court and claim that he's
Speaker 1: ineligible to serve because they claim he's an insurrectionist. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I think the American people are going to spank the
Speaker 1: left hard. I think they're spanking the left right hard
Speaker 1: in this race. I think they're saying, hey, no, we
Speaker 1: are not electing a San Francisco lefty. Let's go to Denver.
Speaker 1: Tuk to Michelle. You're on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 4: Welcome, Hi, Dan.
Speaker 9: That was my point. So if oh, they boot, if
Speaker 9: they boot Biden out of the White House now and
Speaker 9: Kamala steps up as potus and Trump wins as.
Speaker 4: We all expect.
Speaker 9: Who's to say that the Left isn't going to certify
Speaker 9: the election and say Trump go ahead and be in
Speaker 9: the White House. I don't think they're going to let
Speaker 9: Trump into the White House.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, you can expect every type of maneuver imaginable
Speaker 1: knowing it will fail. Right, So the left starts all
Speaker 1: of this knowing it will fail. But their only mission
Speaker 1: is to cripple his presidency as it was in sixteen.
Speaker 1: They knew the Russia Oaks and all of that was
Speaker 1: total made up garbage, and they were responsible for making
Speaker 1: a lot of it up. But they just wanted to
Speaker 1: cripple his presidency. And what he was able to accomplish
Speaker 1: despite all of that is stunning. But yeah, so you're right, Michelle,
Speaker 1: they're going to do all of that, and then the
Speaker 1: question is do they do anything beyond that, because look
Speaker 1: what they did with Biden. I mean, Michelle, we still
Speaker 1: don't know who wrote that note where he allegedly gave
Speaker 1: up the nomination. I mean, even Nancy Pelosi had said
Speaker 1: Biden didn't write that note. So what else do they
Speaker 1: come up with. This is going to be fascinating to watch.
Speaker 1: But don't you think, Michelle, they do it at their
Speaker 1: own peril because the American people are about to, I believe,
Speaker 1: reject the Democratic Party, reject the current path. They're about
Speaker 1: to reject Kamala Harris as a lefty. And if the
Speaker 1: Democrats double middle finger the American people again right after
Speaker 1: election day, what do you think happens to the Democrats?
Speaker 9: Oh, I agree, I agree. I think I think that
Speaker 9: we just don't the Democrats have no path forward yet.
Speaker 4: If they're in the White.
Speaker 9: House, they're not going to leave, and they've already they
Speaker 9: seem to project onto the Republicans everything that they're doing. Yeah,
Speaker 9: you know, they said that Trump would never leave the
Speaker 9: White House. Well he did, and he did it peacefully.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 9: Well, I'm just I'm afraid that they're going to do
Speaker 9: exactly what they said Trump would do.
Speaker 1: Well. I do think that, you know, obviously Biden's going
Speaker 1: to leave, Harris's is going to leave. I expect that, Michelle.
Speaker 1: Thank you for your call. Really do appreciate that. You know, now,
Speaker 1: violence has been, you know, part of the left's playbook
Speaker 1: in America for many, many, many years, and So will
Speaker 1: there be some kind of violent reaction coordinated, funded by
Speaker 1: sources You'll never be able to identify conclusively violent reaction
Speaker 1: to President Trump winning a second term. I think we
Speaker 1: can be virtually certain there will be, right but what
Speaker 1: format will take? How long it will last? Yeah, I
Speaker 1: just think we're heading into an amazing time. The fun part, though,
Speaker 1: but before all of that ugliness and before the fun
Speaker 1: of Trump being president in this nation being much safer
Speaker 1: and better off. The fun part is these next twenty
Speaker 1: seven days, because what are they gonna do over these
Speaker 1: twenty seven days? Ryan, what's your prediction, my friend? I
Speaker 1: don't think there's any chance Biden resigns the presidency. I
Speaker 1: think that was part of the bargain. And I know
Speaker 1: you're saying he doesn't hold any cards, but he can.
Speaker 1: He can make a real ugly and sticky and difficult
Speaker 1: for Kamala Harris and that whole campaign. And we saw
Speaker 1: him you surp her a couple of times already, and
Speaker 1: he kind of threw her a bone today by including
Speaker 1: her in the hurricane press conference.
Speaker 5: It looked really weird doing it too.
Speaker 1: But I think he stays in office. Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: it's it's too late to pull that. I respectfully disagree.
Speaker 1: I think the people who had the leverage they needed
Speaker 1: to force him out because my personal belief right. We've
Speaker 1: discussed it at length. These he's just corrupt. He's just corrupt,
Speaker 1: and he engaged in corruption with Hunter. They've got tons
Speaker 1: of evidence on him, and they had enough evidence to
Speaker 1: force him to give up the nomination. I think they
Speaker 1: have enough evidence to force him to leave the White
Speaker 1: House if they want to. I just think it's too
Speaker 1: late now. I think that move had to be made
Speaker 1: late September or so. So I think we're in agreement
Speaker 1: that you at this point now, they could still replace walls,
Speaker 1: and I'm not predicting that, but they could still do
Speaker 1: it and bring in Shapiro, but they run a greater
Speaker 1: risk now with that. So I just think it's going
Speaker 1: to be a fun, amazing twenty seven days together between
Speaker 1: now and election day. Thank you Ryan, thank you Kelly,
Speaker 1: thank you Zach. Good to meet you, Zach. Hope you
Speaker 1: join us tomorrow four oh six. I'm the Dan Kapli Show.