1 00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:06,280 Speaker 1: How many friends have you lost this weekend? Given politics 2 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:10,599 as people want to think of it, and the Supreme 3 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:15,439 courts boom boom boom decisions on behalf are in favor 4 00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:21,239 of the Trump administration. Yep, I lost a friend this weekend. 5 00:00:21,960 --> 00:00:27,359 My community in North Idaho lost two firefighters who were 6 00:00:27,399 --> 00:00:31,760 apparently drawn in to an ambush and this went on 7 00:00:31,879 --> 00:00:37,280 for hours, hours on a place called Canfield Peak. I 8 00:00:37,359 --> 00:00:40,880 talked about this at length in the sub stack video 9 00:00:40,920 --> 00:00:44,560 for today with some images, et cetera. So, if I 10 00:00:44,560 --> 00:00:48,719 stand a little bit down, horrible, horrible thing in our community, 11 00:00:48,840 --> 00:00:52,200 very difficult, but we're gonna talk about. There's the fact 12 00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:57,679 that there's America, then there's CONTINGI Brown Jackson's America. We'll 13 00:00:57,719 --> 00:01:00,079 get started with the help of Visible. This go BIS. 14 00:01:01,159 --> 00:01:04,079 If you have not established actual corporate credit as a 15 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,079 business owner, you are making an active decision to put 16 00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:11,760 your family's retirement accounts at risk. Let's go Visible dot 17 00:01:11,799 --> 00:01:19,840 com and Lord God, precious Jesus, please please please bring 18 00:01:21,719 --> 00:01:27,840 healing to these families of these fallen first responders, and 19 00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:31,879 please please please preserve the life of the other firefighter 20 00:01:31,920 --> 00:01:34,040 who is, in fact, as I understand, it's still fighting 21 00:01:34,079 --> 00:01:37,640 us for us life and Lord Jesus bring peace to 22 00:01:37,719 --> 00:01:40,480 broken families. Thank you Lord. 23 00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:46,959 Speaker 2: The Todd Herman show is one disapproved by big pharma 24 00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:55,959 technocrats in tyrans everywhere from the high mountains of Free America. 25 00:01:56,680 --> 00:02:02,400 Here's the Emerald City exile God her Man. 26 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:08,520 Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made, and these 27 00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:11,280 are the times to which God has decided we shall live. 28 00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:14,919 I don't know if you've had time to read the 29 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:20,000 opinion as it were from Catangi Brown Jackson, and because 30 00:02:20,080 --> 00:02:26,120 it is a well I would say disappointment. But let's 31 00:02:26,120 --> 00:02:31,159 remember that this is a woman who perjured herself during 32 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:34,599 the Senate interview to be confirmed when she pretended to 33 00:02:34,599 --> 00:02:37,759 not know what a woman is. I can't say that's 34 00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:41,479 perjury because it's opinion. It can't rather prove its perjury. 35 00:02:41,759 --> 00:02:45,400 It was clearly perjury. She herself knew she was selected 36 00:02:45,479 --> 00:02:47,879 because she is black and a woman. She knew that 37 00:02:48,120 --> 00:02:52,039 she was fine with that. And you've probably read Amy 38 00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:56,240 Cony Barrett's takedown of her as it were. And in 39 00:02:56,319 --> 00:03:02,520 terms of Supreme Court language, this is is a short knifing. 40 00:03:03,400 --> 00:03:06,560 I mean, this is a beatdown in terms of how 41 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:12,240 they choose to speak Katangi Brown Jackson's opinion, and this 42 00:03:12,319 --> 00:03:16,520 is on the case of the rogue judges. She writes 43 00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:19,879 phrases like this, and this is a legal insurrection. William 44 00:03:19,879 --> 00:03:26,120 Gibson pulled this out. Executives, let's seem to act in 45 00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:28,639 a man of the thoughts of plain text of the Constitution. Instead, 46 00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:32,080 to the majority, the power hungry actors are dot dot dot. 47 00:03:32,199 --> 00:03:38,280 Wait for it, dot dot dot. The District courts Amy 48 00:03:38,319 --> 00:03:40,919 Cliney Barrett calls out the fact that this woman stands 49 00:03:41,039 --> 00:03:49,439 in direct direct opposition to the Constitution, and in that 50 00:03:50,240 --> 00:03:56,520 in this dissent that Katangi Brown Jackson writes that legalese 51 00:03:56,599 --> 00:03:59,280 bores her. This is the full statement pulled out by 52 00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:03,479 doctor Gibson. Professor Gibson, pardon me, I view the demise 53 00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:05,719 of the notion that a federal judge can order the 54 00:04:05,759 --> 00:04:08,879 executive to adhere to the Constitution full stop as a 55 00:04:08,919 --> 00:04:13,840 sad day for America. The majority's unpersuasive effort to justify 56 00:04:13,879 --> 00:04:18,000 this result makes it sadder still. She doesn't cite any 57 00:04:18,839 --> 00:04:23,000 any presidential acts that the case was based upon that 58 00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:27,879 was discussed to hear the majority tell it. This suit 59 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:34,680 raises a mind numbing technical query. Our universal injunctions sufficiently 60 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:37,519 analogous to the relief issued by the High Court of 61 00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:39,920 the Chancery in England at the time of the adoption 62 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:42,519 of the Constitution and the enactment of the original Judiciary 63 00:04:42,519 --> 00:04:45,519 Act to fall with an equitable authority Congress granted federal 64 00:04:45,560 --> 00:04:48,079 courts and the Judiciary Act of seventeen eighty nine. But 65 00:04:48,160 --> 00:04:50,160 that legally ease as a smoke screen. It obscures a 66 00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:53,160 far more basic question of enormous legal and practical significance. 67 00:04:53,399 --> 00:04:55,800 May a federal court United States order the executive fallow 68 00:04:55,839 --> 00:05:00,839 the law? No, it doesn't a federal court. Can a 69 00:05:00,959 --> 00:05:05,959 district court exceed the power that exists in all the 70 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:10,759 presidential law? The very very narrow scope of this. These 71 00:05:10,920 --> 00:05:17,399 national mandates are new, They are novel. You do not 72 00:05:17,560 --> 00:05:20,720 get to just change society on a novel basis because 73 00:05:20,759 --> 00:05:24,120 you like it, not as a Supreme Court justice. If 74 00:05:24,120 --> 00:05:25,959 you want to do that, get into politics, or get 75 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:29,120 into entertainment or media. And remember Catangi Brown Jackson did 76 00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:32,879 try to get into entertainment when she debased the Supreme 77 00:05:32,920 --> 00:05:38,720 Court by going in supposedly acting in a play that 78 00:05:38,920 --> 00:05:42,759 exists only to promote same sex attraction. That's the only 79 00:05:42,839 --> 00:05:49,439 reason it exists. So her version of America, we're going 80 00:05:49,439 --> 00:05:54,079 to depart looking at just her. We're going to go 81 00:05:54,240 --> 00:06:02,480 instead and look initially at something another courtroom had to 82 00:06:02,519 --> 00:06:06,319 struggle through. I'll talk about that in just a second. 83 00:06:07,439 --> 00:06:09,160 I said that she tried to act. That's true, she 84 00:06:09,240 --> 00:06:11,839 did try to act. I guess I should have hold 85 00:06:11,839 --> 00:06:14,160 that video just to remind everybody that she tried to act. 86 00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:18,040 And of course acting is something that some people are 87 00:06:18,040 --> 00:06:22,199 super super skilled at, and Hollywood has corralled them, put 88 00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:25,959 them into one mindset, punish people who go outside those lines. 89 00:06:26,439 --> 00:06:29,279 So what a miracle that God has allowed Angel Studios 90 00:06:29,319 --> 00:06:32,240 to come out of this now becoming not yet a 91 00:06:32,319 --> 00:06:35,120 major player, but getting there. And they have done something 92 00:06:35,160 --> 00:06:40,959 incredibly smart. They understand that wise counsel is important, that 93 00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:43,360 a fool does not want wise counsel. So they have 94 00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:47,360 offered us an opportunity to become a premium Angel Studios 95 00:06:47,399 --> 00:06:51,519 Guild member and to vote on the movies that they 96 00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:56,040 accept into production, that they make and they promote and 97 00:06:56,079 --> 00:07:01,079 they distribute, and we are the deciding factor. This is 98 00:07:01,120 --> 00:07:04,240 a beautiful thing. And if you have ever carped about Hollywood. 99 00:07:05,079 --> 00:07:07,959 And if you watch any media, then this is as 100 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:10,560 much of no brainer as anything. When you become a 101 00:07:10,600 --> 00:07:13,319 Premium Angel Studios Guild member, you get to stream all 102 00:07:13,399 --> 00:07:18,079 their fan curated shows immediately, including the groundbreaking King of 103 00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:21,519 Kings movie, the animated feature about Jesus Christ that destroyed 104 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:24,759 Snow White that doesn't get enough credits. You get to 105 00:07:24,920 --> 00:07:27,839 get free tickets, two free tickets to every theatrical release 106 00:07:27,879 --> 00:07:30,800 from Angel Studios. And yes, you joined the Angel Studio 107 00:07:30,839 --> 00:07:33,079 Premium Guild membership. We are the ones who green light 108 00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:35,720 the next films. We go to Angel dot com slash 109 00:07:35,759 --> 00:07:38,800 todd that's Angel dot com slash tod and march through 110 00:07:38,839 --> 00:07:42,560 the door that Angel Studios has opened us into Hollywood. 111 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:49,160 So this is gonna sound utterly bizarre, and it's true, 112 00:07:49,279 --> 00:07:52,160 and it received And I looked and looked and looked 113 00:07:52,160 --> 00:07:55,319 for media coverage on this. I asked GROC to find 114 00:07:55,360 --> 00:08:03,600 media coverage on this. A judge figured out that state 115 00:08:03,639 --> 00:08:07,839 officials were allowing to take someone's family from them. They 116 00:08:07,879 --> 00:08:14,639 committed perjury. Now, how does this relate to Kittenji Brown Jackson? 117 00:08:15,839 --> 00:08:21,639 Because Kateenji Brown Jackson only cares about outcomes. It's about 118 00:08:21,639 --> 00:08:25,360 as communists and mouse as it gets the ends justify 119 00:08:25,560 --> 00:08:33,480 the means if erasing the existence, if erasing the necessity 120 00:08:33,480 --> 00:08:37,480 of the Supreme Court by allowing any district court judge 121 00:08:37,519 --> 00:08:45,200 to issue national injunctions on topics absolutely secured within his district. 122 00:08:46,679 --> 00:08:50,039 You remember the Maryland man thing. There's no way that 123 00:08:50,039 --> 00:08:53,559 could be class action. It's one man in one state, 124 00:08:53,639 --> 00:08:57,320 and he wasn't a Maryland man that became a national injunction. 125 00:08:59,039 --> 00:09:03,919 So ruling emotion end justify the means. Watch and or 126 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:09,759 listen to this as this judge confronts a state attorney. 127 00:09:10,120 --> 00:09:10,559 Listen to this. 128 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:13,399 Speaker 3: I understand the argument that it seems to be common 129 00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:15,159 sense and are ethically it's. 130 00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:19,080 Speaker 4: More than common sense. It's statutes that prohibit perjury and 131 00:09:19,399 --> 00:09:21,639 submission of false evidence in court cases. 132 00:09:21,879 --> 00:09:22,799 Speaker 3: State statutes. 133 00:09:22,919 --> 00:09:25,320 Speaker 4: Are you telling me that a person in your client's 134 00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:29,120 shoes couldn't understand you can't commit perjury and a court 135 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:31,879 proceeding in order to take somebody's children away? 136 00:09:32,080 --> 00:09:33,519 Speaker 3: Of course not, you're of course not. 137 00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:34,960 Speaker 1: Isn't the case over then? 138 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:37,000 Speaker 4: And the case is over because what. 139 00:09:36,919 --> 00:09:40,120 Speaker 3: Our clients did, which is remove the children, pursue it 140 00:09:40,159 --> 00:09:41,000 to a court order. 141 00:09:41,320 --> 00:09:43,039 Speaker 5: No, but what they're accused of doing. And what the 142 00:09:43,120 --> 00:09:46,519 issue is here is committing perjury in a court to 143 00:09:46,600 --> 00:09:49,799 take away someone's children. And you just said that's obviously 144 00:09:49,799 --> 00:09:50,720 not okay to do. 145 00:09:51,039 --> 00:09:53,879 Speaker 3: According to our moral compass and our ethical guidelines. But 146 00:09:54,039 --> 00:09:56,639 what we're here to decide is the constitutionality of it, 147 00:09:56,679 --> 00:09:57,759 and we look to the courts. 148 00:09:59,399 --> 00:10:01,679 Speaker 1: I just that is so out of the bizarre. I 149 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:06,159 want Alex to do what's called reracking. Okay, I know 150 00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:10,360 a little inside radio doc. Let's rerack that, Alex, and 151 00:10:10,399 --> 00:10:14,519 I want you to gain Behold, there's a moment in 152 00:10:14,559 --> 00:10:21,159 here where the attorney actually says, I know it's perjury. 153 00:10:21,240 --> 00:10:26,960 But oh, incidentally, here's the coverage Grock found Ready, Orange 154 00:10:26,960 --> 00:10:33,120 Counter Register, find Law, and the Harvard Law Review. No 155 00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:41,320 local news coverage of note this bizarre video. So Katangi 156 00:10:41,399 --> 00:10:44,879 Brown Jackson knows what a woman is, she knows the 157 00:10:44,879 --> 00:10:49,200 definition of a woman. She chose to lie. Katangi Brown 158 00:10:49,240 --> 00:10:53,879 Jackson knows that it's not boring legalese to look at 159 00:10:53,879 --> 00:10:57,679 the precedence so that Supreme Court doesn't start making law. 160 00:10:58,879 --> 00:11:03,679 Supreme Court goes back to the beginning. Our framework is, yes, 161 00:11:03,799 --> 00:11:05,960 English common law, you don't have to like it, but 162 00:11:05,960 --> 00:11:12,279 it's true. The precedence that the majority cited, and remember 163 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:17,600 it was a six to three decision. The precedents that 164 00:11:17,639 --> 00:11:22,919 they decided are spots onto this. She doesn't cite precedent, 165 00:11:23,080 --> 00:11:27,480 she rants. So listen again and or watch to this 166 00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:30,360 and just get to that point where this woman admits 167 00:11:30,519 --> 00:11:33,519 they commit perjury and then uses the phrase I know, 168 00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:34,840 but I. 169 00:11:34,840 --> 00:11:37,360 Speaker 3: Understand the argument that it seems to be common sense 170 00:11:37,559 --> 00:11:38,759 and are ethically it's. 171 00:11:38,600 --> 00:11:42,639 Speaker 4: More than common sense. It's statutes that prohibit perjury and 172 00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:45,679 submission of false evidence in court cases. 173 00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:46,360 Speaker 3: State statutes. 174 00:11:46,480 --> 00:11:48,879 Speaker 4: Are you telling me that a person in your client's 175 00:11:48,919 --> 00:11:52,720 shoes couldn't understand you can't commit perjury in a court 176 00:11:52,799 --> 00:11:55,480 proceeding in order to take somebody's children away? 177 00:11:55,639 --> 00:11:59,720 Speaker 1: Of course not. And the case is over. 178 00:12:00,399 --> 00:12:03,639 Speaker 3: What our clients did, which is remove the children pursue 179 00:12:03,679 --> 00:12:04,600 it to a court order. 180 00:12:04,919 --> 00:12:06,639 Speaker 5: No, But what they're accused of doing, and what the 181 00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:10,080 issue is here is committing perjury in a court to 182 00:12:10,159 --> 00:12:13,360 take away someone's children. And you just said that's obviously 183 00:12:13,399 --> 00:12:14,320 not okay to do. 184 00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:17,440 Speaker 3: According to our moral compass and our ethical guidelines. But 185 00:12:17,639 --> 00:12:20,240 what we're here to decide is the constitutionality of it, 186 00:12:20,279 --> 00:12:20,840 and we look. 187 00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:24,879 Speaker 1: To the court according to our moral companies and constitutional guidelines. 188 00:12:25,559 --> 00:12:27,960 According to statue, you don't get to lie in court. 189 00:12:29,639 --> 00:12:31,679 So here's kind of the background in this This is 190 00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:35,600 from groc. The case discussed in the expos is related 191 00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:38,840 to the Hardwick versus County of Orange lawsuits where Orange 192 00:12:38,879 --> 00:12:41,600 County social workers were found to have lied and falsified 193 00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:44,080 records leading to the removal of children from their mother 194 00:12:44,240 --> 00:12:48,879 over six years. For over six years, they lied and 195 00:12:48,919 --> 00:12:53,759 got to keep the kids for over six years. Here's 196 00:12:53,799 --> 00:12:56,000 some of the news media coverage of this case. Orange 197 00:12:56,039 --> 00:13:00,480 County Register twenty eleven zero four twenty one the article 198 00:13:00,519 --> 00:13:04,559 County looses four point nine millionari lawsuit challenged overlying social workers. 199 00:13:04,559 --> 00:13:06,879 Details of the lawsuit where the county is held accountable 200 00:13:06,879 --> 00:13:10,000 for the actions of the social workers. So Katangi Brown 201 00:13:10,039 --> 00:13:14,879 Jackson could look at this and say that's legalese. This 202 00:13:14,919 --> 00:13:19,159 is boring legalese. The question before this court should be 203 00:13:20,039 --> 00:13:24,559 did it feel good to take the kids away? If 204 00:13:24,600 --> 00:13:26,360 you've been with us for a while, you might remember 205 00:13:26,519 --> 00:13:29,799 some of the cases we've covered where courts lied to 206 00:13:29,960 --> 00:13:33,120 take kids or whether officials lied to take kids. Away. 207 00:13:34,159 --> 00:13:36,399 You might remember the three year journey of a woman 208 00:13:36,480 --> 00:13:40,440 we had on They took her son, pretending she was 209 00:13:40,519 --> 00:13:44,440 starving him. She wasn't starving him in the least. He 210 00:13:44,440 --> 00:13:48,440 didn't lose weight until he went to the hospital. She 211 00:13:48,600 --> 00:13:51,039 finally won her son back with a great, great, great 212 00:13:51,080 --> 00:13:56,159 bit of momentum towards a lawsuit. Catangi Brown Jackson doesn't 213 00:13:56,159 --> 00:13:59,320 care about process, she doesn't care about precedent. She cares 214 00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:05,120 about feelings, and she is not alone in this. This 215 00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:08,840 is I'll get to a case that's involves protecting the 216 00:14:08,879 --> 00:14:12,279 public from keeping it by keeping people violent offenders in jail. 217 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:14,240 Then we'll get back to some of the more current 218 00:14:14,279 --> 00:14:17,919 cases of Catangi Brown Jackson as a representative of leftist 219 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:23,000 thought and justify the means. And we cannot whistle past this. 220 00:14:24,360 --> 00:14:27,000 So the big beautiful bill of course is hanging in 221 00:14:27,039 --> 00:14:30,799 the ballots right now. And Tom Tillis, who has voted 222 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:33,639 Democrat more than Republican, has announced, you know, he's not 223 00:14:33,759 --> 00:14:36,240 interested in re election. He's going to vote on his principles. 224 00:14:36,639 --> 00:14:38,799 He's very, very concerned about the effects and the cuts 225 00:14:38,799 --> 00:14:41,799 of medicare on his constituents, the cuts to Medicare are 226 00:14:41,879 --> 00:14:45,919 largely cuts to fraud, and the amount of fraud that 227 00:14:45,919 --> 00:14:50,879 we've seen in medicare is unbelievably breadtaking. So this bill 228 00:14:51,000 --> 00:14:53,759 could change a lot of things. President Trump says that 229 00:14:53,840 --> 00:14:56,440 the spending in it, and there's a lot, guys, there's 230 00:14:56,480 --> 00:14:59,360 a lot of spending. This isn't a big beautiful bill 231 00:14:59,399 --> 00:15:02,840 in my mind. It's a compromise of compromises. But it 232 00:15:02,879 --> 00:15:07,519 can change the economic outlook very very quickly. So let 233 00:15:07,519 --> 00:15:10,440 me ask you this. If your retirement portfolio was a 234 00:15:10,440 --> 00:15:14,919 political party, how's it doing? Or better yet, a sports team? Okay, 235 00:15:15,679 --> 00:15:18,519 if your retirement accounts was a sports team, how does 236 00:15:18,559 --> 00:15:20,919 it look at halfway through the season or halfway through 237 00:15:20,960 --> 00:15:24,799 the year. Zach Abraham is putting on a free live webinar, 238 00:15:24,919 --> 00:15:28,240 a halftime webinar Thursday, July twenty fourth. He's going to 239 00:15:28,279 --> 00:15:31,360 look at the country and our economy halfway through the year. 240 00:15:31,759 --> 00:15:33,759 This halftime webinar is not going to It's not like 241 00:15:33,799 --> 00:15:36,919 a stink and raw Ross beach. Zach will tell it straight. 242 00:15:37,799 --> 00:15:40,159 He voted for President Trump, he likes most of President 243 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:43,000 Trump's policies, and he'll tell it to you straight as 244 00:15:43,039 --> 00:15:46,360 he sees it. The global unrest, how does that going 245 00:15:46,399 --> 00:15:48,799 to continue to affect the markets, the outlook for the 246 00:15:48,840 --> 00:15:52,120 second half of twenty twenty five, and how Bulwark is 247 00:15:52,159 --> 00:15:55,159 always obsessively looking for ways to lower risk and to 248 00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:59,960 lower costs. So go attend this free live webinar Thursday, 249 00:16:00,080 --> 00:16:03,879 July twenty fourth at Know Your Risk Podcast dot com. 250 00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:10,000 That's k and OW Know Your Riskpodcast dot com. Investment 251 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:12,440 Advisor's surfaces off with their Truck Financial LLC and sec 252 00:16:12,519 --> 00:16:15,320 Regid Investment Advisor investments involved risk and are not guaranteed 253 00:16:15,480 --> 00:16:19,120 past performance, doesn't guarantee future results Truck twenty five that'sh 254 00:16:19,200 --> 00:16:23,720 two point seven. There is America and then there's Katenji 255 00:16:23,840 --> 00:16:28,279 Brown Jackson's America. This is from a case involving keeping 256 00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:35,919 dangerous offenders in prison longer. US attorney Stephanie Rose objected, 257 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:39,039 this comes from Jonathan truly. It does protect the safety 258 00:16:39,080 --> 00:16:41,480 of the public, though when they're not present to recidivate 259 00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:45,840 unpersuaded Jackson continue, our countered, but the amount of time 260 00:16:45,879 --> 00:16:49,240 in jail doesn't affect that, because there's no difference if 261 00:16:49,240 --> 00:16:51,519 we keep them in jail for the extra thirty six 262 00:16:51,559 --> 00:16:57,080 months or whatever whatever they're going to recidivate at the 263 00:16:57,120 --> 00:16:59,120 same rate as if they re release them early. So 264 00:16:59,159 --> 00:17:01,360 I don't see how public but protection is being affected 265 00:17:01,399 --> 00:17:04,480 one way or the other that scenario, because during the 266 00:17:04,519 --> 00:17:07,480 three years they're in prison, they're not committing new crimes. 267 00:17:07,759 --> 00:17:10,599 That's the difference. Rose replied, adding that the Department had 268 00:17:10,599 --> 00:17:13,200 public safety concerns over cutting prison time for so many 269 00:17:13,200 --> 00:17:20,880 felons at once. People have a finite lifespan. God decides 270 00:17:20,920 --> 00:17:26,839 when people die. By keeping that person out of the 271 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:31,839 public realm for a greater percentage of their life, they 272 00:17:31,920 --> 00:17:39,480 then have a lesser opportunity to harm people. It's very 273 00:17:39,599 --> 00:17:43,519 questionable as to if this woman has a functioning intelligence. Truly, 274 00:17:44,839 --> 00:17:47,240 she doesn't get that limiting the opportunity for people to 275 00:17:47,279 --> 00:17:51,359 do harm makes the public safer, or she pretending to 276 00:17:51,400 --> 00:17:58,359 not get that. To the case at hand, continge you 277 00:17:58,400 --> 00:18:01,720 Brown Jackson, and again go back to Jonathan Turley's analysis 278 00:18:01,720 --> 00:18:05,200 of this. She said that limiting the power of individual 279 00:18:05,240 --> 00:18:08,160 judges to freeze the entire federal government was quote enabling 280 00:18:08,200 --> 00:18:11,000 our collective demise. At the very least, I lament that 281 00:18:11,000 --> 00:18:12,640 the majority is so caught up in the minutia of 282 00:18:12,680 --> 00:18:15,319 the government, self serving finger pointing argument that it misses 283 00:18:15,319 --> 00:18:18,880 the point. The minutia dismissed by Jackson's happens to be 284 00:18:18,920 --> 00:18:22,400 the statutory and constitutional of the federal courts. It is 285 00:18:22,440 --> 00:18:25,839 the NUSHA that distinguishes the rule of law from mere 286 00:18:25,920 --> 00:18:31,119 judicial impulse. Justice Barrett clearly it had enough with the 287 00:18:31,160 --> 00:18:34,480 self aggrandizing rhetoric. She delivered a haymaker in writing that 288 00:18:34,640 --> 00:18:38,559 Justice Jackson would do well to hear heed her own admonition. 289 00:18:39,279 --> 00:18:42,839 Everyone from the president undown is bound by the law 290 00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:46,839 that goes for judges too. She added, we will not 291 00:18:46,960 --> 00:18:49,440 dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with 292 00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:52,200 more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention 293 00:18:52,279 --> 00:18:56,920 the Constitution itself. We only observe this Justice Jackson decries 294 00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:03,720 an imperial executive, while in braking an imperial judiciary, Jonathan 295 00:19:03,799 --> 00:19:13,920 Churley writing the imperial judiciary can be imperial prosecutors. That 296 00:19:14,119 --> 00:19:19,759 chilling case an attorney saying, well, I know we committed perjury. 297 00:19:20,319 --> 00:19:23,799 I know my client committed perjury. I know that we 298 00:19:23,920 --> 00:19:29,519 stole someone's kids from them for six years based upon lies. 299 00:19:30,400 --> 00:19:39,519 But we're here to decide if it was constitutional. I mean, 300 00:19:39,559 --> 00:19:41,240 if you'd like to look at this from a strictly 301 00:19:41,319 --> 00:19:46,559 legal perspective. That's the fruit of a poison branch. If 302 00:19:46,599 --> 00:19:53,359 you affect a search without reasonable without reasonable suspicion reasonable cause, 303 00:19:54,519 --> 00:19:56,799 that can get ruled out in courts because it's the 304 00:19:56,799 --> 00:20:05,680 fruit of a poison branch. Back to Jonathan, Turley is 305 00:20:05,720 --> 00:20:09,759 talking here about some of the jurisprudence of jackson exasperation 306 00:20:09,960 --> 00:20:12,240 having to closely follow the text of the law, he 307 00:20:12,319 --> 00:20:15,519 writes in an earlier dissent this term, Jackson lashed out 308 00:20:15,559 --> 00:20:18,960 against the limits of textualism and argued for courts to 309 00:20:19,160 --> 00:20:22,920 free themselves from the confines or shall we say, the 310 00:20:23,000 --> 00:20:28,319 minutia of statutory language. In this opinion, Barrett slams Jackson 311 00:20:28,359 --> 00:20:33,400 for pursuing other diversions quotes because analyzing the governing statute 312 00:20:33,440 --> 00:20:38,079 involves boring legalese end quotes. Again, what Jackson refers to 313 00:20:38,079 --> 00:20:40,319 as legalese is the heart of the jujitsual function in 314 00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:45,640 constraints under Article three. In constraining courts of pardon me 315 00:20:45,720 --> 00:20:49,880 under Article three, untethered by statutory or constitutional tax it 316 00:20:49,920 --> 00:20:52,400 allows the courts to flee from the limits of the constitution. 317 00:20:52,799 --> 00:20:55,400 For many that is not an escape into minutia, but 318 00:20:55,559 --> 00:21:02,839 into madness without clear limits for judicial power. There is America. 319 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:08,599 Then there is Kotenji jack Brown Jackson's America. It doesn't 320 00:21:08,680 --> 00:21:15,319 end there. There's more. Katenji Brown Jackson also cited with 321 00:21:15,440 --> 00:21:19,839 people who want to exploit children for money. Talk about 322 00:21:19,839 --> 00:21:24,640 that in a seconds. Exploitation takes many, many, many forms, 323 00:21:25,240 --> 00:21:28,599 and there has been an exploitation of the power that 324 00:21:28,640 --> 00:21:34,240 the government has handed the medical authorities. I'm creating a webinar. 325 00:21:35,039 --> 00:21:37,480 I'm working with the people at Renewed Healthcare to put 326 00:21:37,480 --> 00:21:42,960 on a webinar coming up this see July eighth, Okay, 327 00:21:43,319 --> 00:21:47,079 July eighth. And in this webinar, I'm going to be there. 328 00:21:47,440 --> 00:21:50,240 This is going to be at two o'clock Pacific time. 329 00:21:50,720 --> 00:21:54,400 I'm going to be there. Steve Anderson, the director, the 330 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:57,039 managing partner of Renew's going to be there. Their healthcare 331 00:21:57,079 --> 00:21:59,160 professions are going to be there. We may have some 332 00:21:59,359 --> 00:22:03,279 successful patients there. So, if you've been curious about renew 333 00:22:03,519 --> 00:22:06,799 and the ethically gathered stem cells only from umbilical cords, 334 00:22:07,319 --> 00:22:10,279 world class replication of those cells so that they only 335 00:22:10,359 --> 00:22:14,039 use the very best cells to solve issues neurological, physical, 336 00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:17,920 keeping people out of surgery, making recovery from surgery more quick, 337 00:22:18,480 --> 00:22:21,720 in fact, extending the lifespan. It seems of someone with als, 338 00:22:21,920 --> 00:22:24,799 a dear, dear lady named Diane and her wonderful husband 339 00:22:24,839 --> 00:22:28,279 named Brian helping my friend Mike I met down there. 340 00:22:28,599 --> 00:22:30,920 Twenty two year marine no longer have knee pain when 341 00:22:30,920 --> 00:22:32,440 he walks up and down the stairs, and that was 342 00:22:32,480 --> 00:22:34,799 just weeks after the event. Or my friend Zach Abraham 343 00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:37,480 went down for lower back stuff. Couldn't believe he sat 344 00:22:37,519 --> 00:22:40,319 on a plane comfortably. He hasn't begun, not even near 345 00:22:40,359 --> 00:22:43,559 their tissuary building stage, or me able to go out 346 00:22:43,599 --> 00:22:45,720 and do reps at a deadlift amount that would have 347 00:22:45,720 --> 00:22:48,119 caused my back to crack and shift. It doesn't do 348 00:22:48,200 --> 00:22:50,880 that anymore. So here's what I'm going to ask you 349 00:22:50,920 --> 00:22:53,640 to do. Go to renew rn U e dot Healthcare 350 00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:57,839 and sign up for this webinar. It's coming up July eighth, 351 00:22:58,240 --> 00:23:02,200 just after the fourth of July break renew dot Healthcare. 352 00:23:04,240 --> 00:23:06,440 So the corruption of the medical system is one thing 353 00:23:07,000 --> 00:23:09,200 we've talked about that a lot. The continued corruption of 354 00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:12,079 the judiciary in this point down to the level of feelings. 355 00:23:12,160 --> 00:23:17,960 Katie Bueller goes and points out a Fifth Scotis opinion 356 00:23:18,599 --> 00:23:22,400 six to three Supreme Court rules Texas can require pornography 357 00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:26,440 websites to verify visitors' ages, upholding a Fifth Circuit decision 358 00:23:26,720 --> 00:23:28,799 that subjected the law to the lowest level of First 359 00:23:28,839 --> 00:23:33,880 Amendment scrutiny. Liberals, of course, dissented. So let's just be 360 00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:41,559 clear on this. We have liberals recognizing age limits for voting. 361 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:46,400 They don't like them, but they recognize them. In this case, 362 00:23:46,519 --> 00:23:51,400 it's clear that the porn sites themselves have already agreed 363 00:23:51,440 --> 00:23:55,400 to the age limits. They're employing them. They don't like them, 364 00:23:55,440 --> 00:23:59,440 but they have to agree. The so called logic of 365 00:23:59,480 --> 00:24:04,960 these people is that, yeah, there's age limits there, but 366 00:24:05,119 --> 00:24:11,079 states cannot require them to verify the age, so people 367 00:24:11,119 --> 00:24:15,200 can simply say, I'm eighteen. Does this work in any 368 00:24:15,240 --> 00:24:22,200 physical location. It's no secret that the Left is absolutely 369 00:24:22,400 --> 00:24:26,279 bent on making sure kids see as much pornography as possible. 370 00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:30,000 They're putting it into the schools. Justice Jackson is part 371 00:24:30,039 --> 00:24:34,839 of this. There's no mistake here. There's no coincidence the 372 00:24:34,880 --> 00:24:37,400 fact that they do not want these porn sites held 373 00:24:37,440 --> 00:24:39,920 to account for doing something they're supposed to do under 374 00:24:39,920 --> 00:24:41,960 the law speaks to the fact that they don't like 375 00:24:42,000 --> 00:24:47,960 the law, and in Katji Brown Jackson's world, not liking 376 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:52,480 the law, you get to ignore the so called legalese. Texas, 377 00:24:52,519 --> 00:24:56,480 like many states, prohibits the distribution of sexually explicit content 378 00:24:56,519 --> 00:24:59,279 to children. Texas Pedal Code and they name the code. 379 00:24:59,680 --> 00:25:03,039 But although that prohibition may be effective against brick and 380 00:25:03,119 --> 00:25:07,319 mortar stores, it has proved challenging to enforce against online content. 381 00:25:07,720 --> 00:25:10,240 In an effort to address this problem, TESCS enacted and 382 00:25:10,279 --> 00:25:13,599 they go through the bill which requires certain commercial announced 383 00:25:13,640 --> 00:25:17,640 law commercial websites that publish sexually explicit content to verify 384 00:25:17,640 --> 00:25:21,640 the ages of their visitors. This requirement furthers furthers the 385 00:25:21,720 --> 00:25:25,640 lawful end of preventing children from accessing sexually explicit content, 386 00:25:26,160 --> 00:25:29,920 but it also burdens adult visitors of these websites, who 387 00:25:30,039 --> 00:25:32,680 all agree, we all agree with a First Amendment right 388 00:25:32,720 --> 00:25:34,920 to access at least some of the content that the 389 00:25:34,960 --> 00:25:39,359 websites publish. We granted Serratri to decide whether these burdens 390 00:25:39,440 --> 00:25:42,319 likely render HB one one eight one on constitutional under 391 00:25:42,359 --> 00:25:44,839 the free speech clause of the First Amendment. We hold 392 00:25:44,880 --> 00:25:47,759 that they do not the power to require age verification 393 00:25:47,839 --> 00:25:50,599 is with the state's authority to prevent children from accessing 394 00:25:51,160 --> 00:25:56,960 sexually explicit content. You can check IDs, and you're supposed to. 395 00:25:57,160 --> 00:26:01,720 When people fly, you can check IDs. When people attempt 396 00:26:01,759 --> 00:26:08,319 to buy alcohol, in fact, must you check ideas of course, 397 00:26:08,359 --> 00:26:12,680 when people want to purchase a firearm, In fact you must. 398 00:26:15,079 --> 00:26:15,160 Speaker 6: So. 399 00:26:15,279 --> 00:26:21,559 Speaker 1: Katenji Brown Jackson's world is that if a thing seems good, 400 00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:29,119 wait for it, dot dot dot. Why should something as 401 00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:32,720 stupid as English common law, as boring as legal ease, 402 00:26:32,759 --> 00:26:36,000 as technical as the clear and distinct reading of the 403 00:26:36,079 --> 00:26:40,519 United States Constitution that the voters can put limits on 404 00:26:40,559 --> 00:26:46,480 what children can access in countless ways, from tattoos to 405 00:26:46,599 --> 00:26:51,279 flying by themselves. States can do this, so can the 406 00:26:51,319 --> 00:26:56,039 federal government. Now see there was a time, There was 407 00:26:56,079 --> 00:27:02,400 a time when there was a CONTINGI Brown jack who 408 00:27:02,480 --> 00:27:06,359 was not on the Supreme Court. See she was just 409 00:27:06,400 --> 00:27:10,160 a so called academic. She's had a ton of jobs. 410 00:27:11,480 --> 00:27:15,519 She was relatively harmless as an academic. But this speaks 411 00:27:15,559 --> 00:27:20,279 to what the academic world has become. She talked person 412 00:27:20,359 --> 00:27:22,720 to person. This is a segment from this programmed person 413 00:27:22,759 --> 00:27:28,319 to person, and here she is describing her concern with 414 00:27:28,599 --> 00:27:32,920 Donald Trump's immunity. Now, listen to how she describes Donald 415 00:27:32,920 --> 00:27:36,880 Trump's immunity that the Supreme Court recognized. Listen to her description. 416 00:27:36,680 --> 00:27:43,440 Speaker 6: Are president versus ordinary person, and that the idea, the 417 00:27:43,480 --> 00:27:47,079 sort of founding principle of no one is above the law, 418 00:27:47,960 --> 00:27:51,359 is really folded into the way the criminal justice system operates. 419 00:27:52,359 --> 00:27:54,599 Speaker 7: In your dissent, you wrote that the court declared for 420 00:27:54,680 --> 00:27:58,319 the first time in history that the most powerful official 421 00:27:58,359 --> 00:28:01,640 in the United States can, under circumstances yet to be 422 00:28:01,680 --> 00:28:07,160 fully determined, become a law unto himself. It sounds like 423 00:28:07,160 --> 00:28:07,680 a warning. 424 00:28:09,799 --> 00:28:14,480 Speaker 6: Well, I mean that was my view of what the 425 00:28:14,480 --> 00:28:15,599 court determined. 426 00:28:16,200 --> 00:28:18,759 Speaker 7: You were concerned about broad immunity. 427 00:28:19,440 --> 00:28:25,319 Speaker 6: I was concerned about a system that appeared to provide 428 00:28:25,359 --> 00:28:30,880 immunity for one individual under one set of circumstances, when 429 00:28:30,920 --> 00:28:34,839 we have a criminal justice system that had ordinarily treated 430 00:28:34,880 --> 00:28:35,680 everyone the same. 431 00:28:36,160 --> 00:28:44,200 Speaker 1: Catangie Brown Jackson. The ruling was this, Presidents, none of 432 00:28:44,200 --> 00:28:50,359 them can be sued for carrying out their official duties, 433 00:28:50,599 --> 00:28:54,039 nor can they be criminalized for carrying out their official duties. 434 00:28:56,640 --> 00:29:01,599 Let me give you an example here and Zach chief investment 435 00:29:01,599 --> 00:29:06,559 officer Bolwar Capital. He informed me this Congress can inside 436 00:29:06,559 --> 00:29:11,799 trade all day long, openly go to need to hide it. 437 00:29:13,960 --> 00:29:18,319 If you or I were sitting on an airplane and 438 00:29:18,519 --> 00:29:22,200 we overlooked someone's computer screen and let's see it, had 439 00:29:22,200 --> 00:29:24,440 a conversation with them over lunch. You know that they 440 00:29:24,480 --> 00:29:28,319 work at this or that company, public company, for instance, 441 00:29:28,400 --> 00:29:31,319 let's say it's Tesla. You know that they work at Tesla, 442 00:29:32,039 --> 00:29:34,559 and you're looking at their computer screen and you see 443 00:29:34,960 --> 00:29:38,720 that Tesla is launching in the first quarter of next year, 444 00:29:39,200 --> 00:29:43,640 a full on commercial sale of flying cars with clearance 445 00:29:45,599 --> 00:29:47,680 with the federal authorities to be able to fly in 446 00:29:47,720 --> 00:29:49,920 and out of local airports. And the price point is 447 00:29:49,960 --> 00:29:54,160 thirty thousand bucks. And you look at that, go, dear God, 448 00:29:54,160 --> 00:29:57,240 this is going to change everything. I'm buying Tesla stock. Now. 449 00:29:58,559 --> 00:30:01,839 If you did that, and it was later proven that 450 00:30:01,880 --> 00:30:04,839 you did that because you came across that information by 451 00:30:04,880 --> 00:30:07,640 simply look at a person's computer screen, you could go 452 00:30:07,720 --> 00:30:14,359 to prison face a massive fine. A member of Congress 453 00:30:14,519 --> 00:30:21,119 who approved the flying cars, who was in on the 454 00:30:21,160 --> 00:30:27,960 meetings and the discussions, members of the bureaucracy that approved it, 455 00:30:28,799 --> 00:30:36,880 could all openly buy stock and not be punished. The 456 00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:43,880 president's official duty as president does not include murder. It 457 00:30:43,880 --> 00:30:50,000 does not include sexual assault. Brock Husi and Obama bragged 458 00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:54,000 about using drones to kill American citizens, which is blatantly illegal, 459 00:30:55,920 --> 00:30:58,000 and he said it turns out he's good at killing folks. 460 00:31:00,039 --> 00:31:04,119 Llrick Clinton committed national security filmies and hundreds of them, 461 00:31:04,160 --> 00:31:08,519 and was cleared. She committed the acts which were not 462 00:31:08,720 --> 00:31:12,119 official duties. It is not an official duty to share 463 00:31:12,279 --> 00:31:17,319 top secret information with your lawyers who don't have clearance, 464 00:31:17,480 --> 00:31:21,640 or worse, maybe given this an activist law firm, worse 465 00:31:21,680 --> 00:31:25,559 with the guy who's working on your unsecured server. That's 466 00:31:25,599 --> 00:31:27,359 not in the official line of duty. In fact, it's 467 00:31:27,400 --> 00:31:31,359 against the official line of duty. This is the same 468 00:31:31,400 --> 00:31:35,400 Supreme Court that has not bothered to go through and 469 00:31:35,400 --> 00:31:41,599 find the leaker, and we can't make them. Catangi Brown 470 00:31:41,720 --> 00:31:46,440 Jackson is pretending that this was broad immunity. We have 471 00:31:46,720 --> 00:31:50,960 watched broad immunity. We have watched now as we have 472 00:31:51,079 --> 00:31:57,440 learned that the people who ran Joe Biden gave junior 473 00:31:57,480 --> 00:32:02,000 people access to the autopen assistance, access to the auto pen. 474 00:32:04,319 --> 00:32:05,920 So I got to wrap this up and take this 475 00:32:06,039 --> 00:32:08,039 right back up to the top here in a seconds. 476 00:32:09,000 --> 00:32:13,160 And I want us to reflect upon America versus Catangy 477 00:32:13,240 --> 00:32:17,400 Brown Jackson's America. Well, let's reflect on this, because there's 478 00:32:17,440 --> 00:32:20,720 been a big, big price paid to have America what 479 00:32:20,759 --> 00:32:24,599 it is or should be. Some of those prices are 480 00:32:24,640 --> 00:32:31,240 irretrievable lives. We're going into Independence Day. We don't get 481 00:32:31,240 --> 00:32:34,519 to have Independence day if we don't have a good standing, 482 00:32:34,759 --> 00:32:39,279 solid military to protect us. And in my home in 483 00:32:39,319 --> 00:32:42,359 North Idaho, we just saw the value of that protection. 484 00:32:43,720 --> 00:32:45,359 I don't know if it was a terrorist. I know 485 00:32:45,400 --> 00:32:49,400 it's a terrorist activity to use fire to draw first 486 00:32:49,440 --> 00:32:53,200 responders in in order to take their lives. And I 487 00:32:53,279 --> 00:32:57,599 know that brave men and women went up Canfield Peak 488 00:32:59,039 --> 00:33:01,200 ultimately trying to take that guy out as they were 489 00:33:01,240 --> 00:33:06,000 facing a forest fire. Who are these people, Well, at 490 00:33:06,039 --> 00:33:10,440 least one of them. I know, former neighbor of mine 491 00:33:11,400 --> 00:33:14,400 was up there, and I trust he's okay. In fact, 492 00:33:14,400 --> 00:33:16,799 I got a text from him this morning, he's okay. 493 00:33:17,559 --> 00:33:19,799 They're the sort of people like Tim Krukshank, who spent 494 00:33:19,880 --> 00:33:23,759 his life protecting US three deployments as a Navy seal, 495 00:33:24,839 --> 00:33:27,319 and he did this in combat. He came back and 496 00:33:27,359 --> 00:33:30,240 he became a BUDS instructor and after his career in 497 00:33:30,279 --> 00:33:33,119 the Navy, he decided to start a coffee company. So 498 00:33:33,319 --> 00:33:36,319 I would tell you patriotically, I actually think that you 499 00:33:36,480 --> 00:33:38,160 owe it to Tim to try his coffee. So how 500 00:33:38,200 --> 00:33:41,759 about the Red White and Brew for Independence Day? There's 501 00:33:41,759 --> 00:33:44,039 still time to order this for your Independence Day gathering. 502 00:33:44,119 --> 00:33:45,720 And no, I don't like to say fourth of July. 503 00:33:45,759 --> 00:33:47,519 I like to recognize what it was. It was our 504 00:33:47,559 --> 00:33:52,119 independence from Tyrany. So go try a Red White and Brew. 505 00:33:52,440 --> 00:33:56,359 And it's a patriotic way to celebrate Independence Day with 506 00:33:56,400 --> 00:33:59,599 your family, because if you're not getting completely geeked on caffeine, 507 00:33:59,720 --> 00:34:03,119 what fun is fireworks? Really? Honestly, with your now geeking 508 00:34:03,720 --> 00:34:06,920 go to bonefrog dot com slash todd get ten percent 509 00:34:06,960 --> 00:34:09,800 off your first purchase or fifteen percent off subscription coffee 510 00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:12,440 and a coffee recommended for Independence Day of Red White 511 00:34:12,480 --> 00:34:15,119 and Brew Bonefrog Cooffee dot com slash Todd. Please make 512 00:34:15,159 --> 00:34:17,960 sure you use promo cod promote code tod at checkout. 513 00:34:19,840 --> 00:34:22,639 Do you want to live in a world where you 514 00:34:22,679 --> 00:34:25,800 can be pulled over by a police officer and you 515 00:34:25,880 --> 00:34:30,000 say high officer, good morning. License registration, proof of insurance please, yes, sir, 516 00:34:30,039 --> 00:34:33,199 here you are sir my ask why I is pulled over? Yeah, 517 00:34:33,199 --> 00:34:37,719 I was having a bad day. You were having a 518 00:34:37,760 --> 00:34:41,400 bad day, yep. Decided to pull someone over and have 519 00:34:41,519 --> 00:34:45,360 some fun taking money from people. Okay, that's illegal. Yeah, 520 00:34:45,400 --> 00:34:52,119 but what you're gonna do? You're pulled over? You can 521 00:34:52,199 --> 00:34:56,239 drive away? Oh, I know you can beat this in court. 522 00:34:56,239 --> 00:34:59,440 But you know what, I think I need to inspect 523 00:34:59,440 --> 00:35:04,679 your car force. I'm just gonna do it. In fact, 524 00:35:04,719 --> 00:35:07,639 you know I think this car is unsafe. I'm going 525 00:35:07,679 --> 00:35:11,280 to order it toad, and you can go to court, 526 00:35:12,440 --> 00:35:17,559 probably get overturned lack of evidence. Nothing happens to me, 527 00:35:18,159 --> 00:35:20,039 But man, I get to enjoy watching you scuirrem and 528 00:35:20,079 --> 00:35:23,320 I had a really rotten day. So step out of 529 00:35:23,320 --> 00:35:26,639 the car. It's getting impounded. Well, that can't happen, right 530 00:35:27,880 --> 00:35:32,760 in conting you Brown Jackson's America. It absolutely can. Here's 531 00:35:32,800 --> 00:35:38,199 a prosecutor saying, yes, it's wrong to commit perjury. But 532 00:35:39,119 --> 00:35:42,199 that's just legal ease. Let's rerac that, Alex. 533 00:35:42,400 --> 00:35:45,679 Speaker 3: Yes, just legalese, common sense and are ethically. 534 00:35:45,760 --> 00:35:49,519 Speaker 4: It's more than common sense. It's statutes that prohibit perjury 535 00:35:49,960 --> 00:35:52,599 and submission of false evidence in court cases. 536 00:35:52,840 --> 00:35:53,719 Speaker 3: State statutes. 537 00:35:53,840 --> 00:35:56,239 Speaker 4: Are you telling me that a person in your client's 538 00:35:56,280 --> 00:35:59,960 shoes couldn't understand you can't commit perjury in a court 539 00:36:00,159 --> 00:36:02,840 proceeding in order to take somebody's children away. 540 00:36:03,000 --> 00:36:04,480 Speaker 3: Of course not, you're of course not. 541 00:36:04,960 --> 00:36:05,920 Speaker 1: Isn't the case over then? 542 00:36:05,960 --> 00:36:08,000 Speaker 4: And the case is over because. 543 00:36:07,719 --> 00:36:11,000 Speaker 3: What our clients did, which is remove the children, pursue 544 00:36:11,000 --> 00:36:11,960 it to a court order. 545 00:36:12,280 --> 00:36:14,000 Speaker 5: No, But what they're accused of doing, and what the 546 00:36:14,079 --> 00:36:17,440 issue is here is committing perjury in a court to 547 00:36:17,519 --> 00:36:20,719 take away someone's children. And you just said, that's obviously 548 00:36:20,760 --> 00:36:21,719 not okay to do. 549 00:36:21,960 --> 00:36:24,800 Speaker 3: According to our moral compass and our ethical guidelines. But 550 00:36:25,000 --> 00:36:27,559 what we're here to decide is the constitutionality of it, 551 00:36:27,639 --> 00:36:29,159 and we look to the courts. 552 00:36:29,840 --> 00:36:32,960 Speaker 1: If you are not watching the video, the look on 553 00:36:33,000 --> 00:36:35,079 the face of the judge in the top left, who 554 00:36:35,039 --> 00:36:38,159 appears to be the presiding justice in this three judge panel, 555 00:36:38,639 --> 00:36:43,639 his mouth is open, he's his mouth is a gape. Oh, 556 00:36:43,840 --> 00:36:53,360 just one other fun fact, No one was charged with perjury. 557 00:36:54,079 --> 00:36:56,639 Taxpayers paid four point nine million dollars to the family, 558 00:37:00,119 --> 00:37:06,079 not the people, not those who committed perjury. There is 559 00:37:06,119 --> 00:37:12,960 no record of even a civil fine for stealing someone's 560 00:37:13,119 --> 00:37:19,840 children for six years. But yes, yes, yes, tell us 561 00:37:19,920 --> 00:37:26,000 all about the Imperial Executive. This is the Todd Hermershaw. 562 00:37:26,039 --> 00:37:29,280 Please go, be well, be strong, be kind and please 563 00:37:29,360 --> 00:37:35,760 today maybe this is selfish. Please pray for the first 564 00:37:35,800 --> 00:37:39,000 responders community in North Idaho and go walk in the 565 00:37:39,079 --> 00:37:39,719 life of Christ.