Speaker 1: All right, okay, so we're back. Uh, sorry about that.
Speaker 1: It wasn't anticipating that, you know. I guess nobody could
Speaker 1: hear me, and OBS is usually pretty safe when it
Speaker 1: comes to stuff like that, but I guess it just
Speaker 1: when I reset my road cast, it decided to disconnect
Speaker 1: from the audio, so whoops. Okay. So you know, for
Speaker 1: some people, you know, not being able to hear me,
Speaker 1: that's probably the best episode I ever did. I should
Speaker 1: have just kept on going with that. Rebecca left at
Speaker 1: that joke. Anyway, so we're here and Oopsie apologize or
Speaker 1: you know, I know you could hear the video that
Speaker 1: was being played, So if you I don't really want
Speaker 1: to deal through it again because I've I had a
Speaker 1: view it first to decide whether it was gonna be
Speaker 1: good for us today, and then I said through it,
Speaker 1: and now I would have to do it again to
Speaker 1: show you. So I'll just tell you that it's called
Speaker 1: Behind Ours b A A B A R S. I'm
Speaker 1: Jamie Deluxe Channel, and it's more stuff about Epstein, similar
Speaker 1: interesting stuff and if you want me to play it,
Speaker 1: maybe I'll play it at the end of the show.
Speaker 1: Just tell me if you want me to do that,
Speaker 1: and I'll put it at the end. But let's just
Speaker 1: go move on to something else now and now onto
Speaker 1: something completely different. Okay, so this drop today? Let me
Speaker 1: see who's who's hearing me? Now? Can you hear me?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: Why is my chat's the same thing? I got fixed?
Speaker 1: The chat? Let's let's double track to make sure that
Speaker 1: I'm actually on this time. One must know these things. Yeah,
Speaker 1: one must know. Okay, so I guess we just have
Speaker 1: to wait for people to show back up right now,
Speaker 1: we are currently sans humans, So let's go over here
Speaker 1: and share this link. Nobody's gonna care about this because
Speaker 1: I'm not having it here anyway.
Speaker 3: So.
Speaker 1: I'll just throw it in here. Oops. Oops. Based people
Speaker 1: don't get notifications very quickly, and I started right after
Speaker 1: I had don't. I'm pretty sure they're not. They're not
Speaker 1: familiar that they're not aware that it's going to come up?
Speaker 1: So are you starting now? Smiles? That gets to basically nobody.
Speaker 1: But here you go, and even though I don't, you
Speaker 1: don't see this one, I'm pretty sure you don't. Let
Speaker 1: me go ahead and pull this up. Let's find out
Speaker 1: if you do. No, you do not, so I can
Speaker 1: just coolick this shut that one down, put this one up,
Speaker 1: and I bet you will, I bet you will. Hoose.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, oh this is new. Wow, that's awesome. Got
Speaker 1: to go rob. Oh. So I thought this was kind
Speaker 1: of funny, I said, they say opposites a tract. No
Speaker 1: example shows this better than Busta and Leanne rhymes. I
Speaker 1: don't bump right, let's make that joke for probably three
Speaker 1: years solid. But yeah, so the Mike Adams interviewed is
Speaker 1: show up today and I, dude, believe that there was
Speaker 1: much more meat and dato was in the original recording,
Speaker 1: but they edited it. And you can tell that they
Speaker 1: edited it in some parts because when you go to
Speaker 1: I don't even dropped the link in here. Now, let's
Speaker 1: see what happens. Nell, See that's wrong one there we
Speaker 1: go four people, all right, So yeah, I had to
Speaker 1: start over obs wasn't on the right microphone setting because
Speaker 1: I had to restart my road caster. So it just
Speaker 1: was like and then I didn't realize that it did that
Speaker 1: a new firmware update on the road caster here in
Speaker 1: front of me. So anyhow, I do apologize for Yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe I don't apologize. Maybe it was a good thing
Speaker 1: that didn't have to hear me, right, Um, so it
Speaker 1: came out. I think if you get a chance to,
Speaker 1: you should go to the one that Mike posted on
Speaker 1: his rumble. And if you are following the show and
Speaker 1: you kind of understand the background as to why I
Speaker 1: say things a little bit more than maybe the cursor
Speaker 1: reviewer who doesn't know anybody anything about me and doesn't
Speaker 1: know who I am and all that stuff, but what
Speaker 1: I stand for or any of the other things that
Speaker 1: build up to my thought process and don't understand where
Speaker 1: I'm coming from, maybe you should help fix the commentary
Speaker 1: by putting your own inform me, you know, dropping your
Speaker 1: own comment on here. Because so Fa, it's not that
Speaker 1: it's not bad, it's just there's some people in here,
Speaker 1: like this ship bag here, there's a couple of people
Speaker 1: in there that I just wanted to tear it apart,
Speaker 1: and I don't think it went didn't go over bad.
Speaker 1: There are some things that were cut out. So the
Speaker 1: things that were cut out were me mentioning the Sung
Speaker 1: cult because I think people associate that with paganism, because
Speaker 1: that's where it goes through the lens of the scope
Speaker 1: of the Christian slash Catholicism. And everything that's not that
Speaker 1: came before them is bad. And you know, and it's like, no, actually,
Speaker 1: that's like the core of everything that you now have
Speaker 1: as your religion and everything that has been come that
Speaker 1: it was hijacked by and co opted by these little
Speaker 1: middleman turds called the Semites. And they have you hating
Speaker 1: your own ancestors and all this taking the credit for
Speaker 1: the founding of civilization and all this stuff is lies.
Speaker 1: They weren't monotheistic. They were demon demonists. They didn't have
Speaker 1: a concept of a creation at all until they learned one,
Speaker 1: all right. So the Goths and everything that was spoken of,
Speaker 1: like when you go back to the Eda, you see
Speaker 1: where they get these concepts from in the beginning of
Speaker 1: time or the beginning of Adam and all that stuff.
Speaker 1: It takes on a whole new meeting and it's very
Speaker 1: symbolic and it's very treacherous the way they've rephrased and
Speaker 1: reframed things. But the Goths brought monotheism, They brought monogamy,
Speaker 1: a concept of a family life that it wasn't there.
Speaker 1: Just like the cults that you see, the Thalamic cults, this,
Speaker 1: the sex cults. They all practice wife swapping girls wipe.
Speaker 1: You know, they're not even wifes. So you know they
Speaker 1: have sex with everybody and at all age groups, and
Speaker 1: you know, play round robin or musical chairs with them.
Speaker 1: This is how they've always been. The one thing that
Speaker 1: they modeled was more like they took this to give
Speaker 1: themselves credibility, and then they claimed that they were the
Speaker 1: arbiters and owners of this ideal ideals, and they're not.
Speaker 1: They didn't create civilizations and they can't now. Parasites can't
Speaker 1: do that. They can only live off of things and
Speaker 1: suck them dry. This is what our ancestors encountered five
Speaker 1: thousand years ago. This is why they put them down.
Speaker 1: But just calling something a sun cult makes everybody scared,
Speaker 1: but that's what it was. They venerated the sun for
Speaker 1: being that which gives life to all things. They had
Speaker 1: a benevolent creator concept a creator, benevolent creator, the same
Speaker 1: one you're supposed to believe in that is in the Bible,
Speaker 1: same thing. There's only one, so it has to be
Speaker 1: the same. And like I said, monotheism, justice, fairness, nobility, integrity, honest,
Speaker 1: laws and just They were called the protectors prior to
Speaker 1: the time of author his ancestors, his family were the shields,
Speaker 1: shields meeting protection or guardians, and that meant not just
Speaker 1: to their own tribe, but to anyone whom they ruled over,
Speaker 1: because it was a kind rulership. It wasn't, you know,
Speaker 1: foisted upon people. It was because they were the best
Speaker 1: to rule and to teach others how to live civilized.
Speaker 1: That's why they filled that role. And everywhere they've gone
Speaker 1: and build a creation, you know, build a civilization or
Speaker 1: an empire or a kingdom. That was all them. And
Speaker 1: when they were removed by wars, by treachery, by whatever
Speaker 1: other means, everything fell apart. And a lot of times
Speaker 1: it was the same cult chasing them around the map
Speaker 1: and throughout history, infiltrating them and eroding them from within,
Speaker 1: inviting invading armies to their gates, opening the gates for
Speaker 1: them and letting them destroy everything because they'd already sucked
Speaker 1: everything thing out of it. And then they move on
Speaker 1: to the next place that we had established and started there,
Speaker 1: and the same as it ever was. That's what happening.
Speaker 1: That's happening to America right now, happened to Europe already.
Speaker 1: They had it first. We got the affliction second or
Speaker 1: not second, but after them, so to say something that.
Speaker 1: That's why I think they cut it because it would
Speaker 1: confuse people because they're looking through this. They hear some
Speaker 1: and they hear a cult, and they think, oh my god,
Speaker 1: this is you know it even mythrism is is uh
Speaker 1: misunderstood mythraism. But you can't you can't try to reteach
Speaker 1: somebody that because their church and their you know, the
Speaker 1: sun and the paganism, and it's paganist. That's that's all
Speaker 1: they think. So that I think that's why that portion
Speaker 1: of it is removed and you can kind of tell
Speaker 1: that it's missing. But also at the very end of
Speaker 1: this interview, you see I just want to make them
Speaker 1: on the screen. You see where Mike is doing his
Speaker 1: wrap up and then all of a sudden there's like
Speaker 1: another little clip right after he does his wrap up.
Speaker 1: That's us just talking again. So the editor must have
Speaker 1: you know, you can take clip files and moving them.
Speaker 1: So I think when you rendered it he had something
Speaker 1: at the tail end that was supposed to be before it.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but so good it's it came out okay.
Speaker 1: You know, sometimes I don't have all the answers, and
Speaker 1: I don't like, I'm not going to be able to
Speaker 1: have an intellectual discussion about bricks because I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't put time in the understanding things that I find
Speaker 1: to be unreal, like this the system of money and
Speaker 1: how it's good, Like I don't trust any of it.
Speaker 1: And if any nation really wanted its people to be
Speaker 1: strong and prosper and want their nation to be strong
Speaker 1: and impenetrable to outside forces or inside forces that would
Speaker 1: be you know, all enemies, foreign and domestic, then they
Speaker 1: would not limit their growth through an artificial system of wealth.
Speaker 1: The country itself would provide that which people needed to
Speaker 1: build innovation to make them all stronger. People like Tesla
Speaker 1: wouldn't have had to beg JP Morgan and JP Morgan's
Speaker 1: son for funding that he was never going to get,
Speaker 1: because they didn't want him to create something that the
Speaker 1: public knew about that could replace standard oil. They didn't
Speaker 1: want something that they couldn't have recurring bills on when
Speaker 1: it came to electricity. These were not in their interest
Speaker 1: to promote or fund. So it's because of this desire
Speaker 1: to control and to sap away the wealth of people,
Speaker 1: these parasitic actions that things like that that could liberate
Speaker 1: all of man don't come to pass. So that's a
Speaker 1: broken system that didn't happen to Libya. And I do
Speaker 1: get a chance to speak about Libya a little bit,
Speaker 1: but I think even parts of that were time taken out,
Speaker 1: so I think, but it's not my show, it was Mike's,
Speaker 1: and his editors probably don't even can confer with him
Speaker 1: unless Mike probably says something specifically if there's something that
Speaker 1: you know, this is going to cause too much this
Speaker 1: or too much that. I don't think he did that.
Speaker 1: I think he hands it off to them and then
Speaker 1: they do whatever they do. And it wasn't a bad thing.
Speaker 1: I think it came out pretty good. And it's like
Speaker 1: thirty eight minutes long. The whole thing's fifty eight, but
Speaker 1: I think like a portion of it is just his
Speaker 1: wrap up in advertisements. But I think we were on
Speaker 1: for close to an hour, so some parts of it
Speaker 1: are missing. But it flowed better than when I was
Speaker 1: there talking because I wasn't sure what we were going
Speaker 1: to disco us, so I had to kind of think
Speaker 1: on my on my feet, and I just was not
Speaker 1: my environment to do that as I was away when
Speaker 1: when sorry, hold on, could I put that on the screen?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, sorry, Joe, hopefully you're back, Brad? Is that
Speaker 1: you are? You still there? Uh? Yeah, I can't put
Speaker 1: these on the screen with this setup. I have to
Speaker 1: do some sort of weird thing where I am able
Speaker 1: to integrate it with the stream. Well, I can do
Speaker 1: it this way, though, I can go into well, first
Speaker 1: of all, let me do this so it sounds screamy.
Speaker 1: Let's take it. Do that one, and then I can
Speaker 1: go like this, Yeah, here you go, So then I
Speaker 1: can I can show you on the screen like that,
Speaker 1: but I can't pull it up and banner it. Yeah.
Speaker 1: That was. That was July July fifteenth that we had
Speaker 1: our talk was suppose to July nine seventh. So I
Speaker 1: actually postponed my vacation on my my my trip to
Speaker 1: see my parents with my daughter for two days, and
Speaker 1: when I went the ninth and then he rescheduled, I
Speaker 1: was like, you know, but you know, eighteen days was
Speaker 1: sufficient for what we did. Yeah, So I mean, I like,
Speaker 1: I don't know anything about bricks. I don't know, I
Speaker 1: don't know what I've what I believe in all that stuff.
Speaker 1: A lot of times people skew that into you know,
Speaker 1: putin bad and I don't. I don't buy that. And
Speaker 1: I also don't understand the whole because I know that
Speaker 1: China hasn't been Chinese since Mao, so there are involvement
Speaker 1: in it in you know, India and all this stuff.
Speaker 1: I have a lot of questions before I would ever
Speaker 1: just fully adopt that this is gonna be something good
Speaker 1: that's going to be in opposition to the Federal Reserve
Speaker 1: and the you know, banking culta, and that's just something
Speaker 1: else that's going to be manipulated by the wrong hands
Speaker 1: or just going in the wrong direction. You know, I
Speaker 1: haven't seen any of these countries nationalize any of their
Speaker 1: own resources, because if they were conquered, they can't because
Speaker 1: that's the first thing that banks do. You can't pay
Speaker 1: back something that you never asked for because they blew
Speaker 1: apart your country in the war. They've wasted an i'm
Speaker 1: meflowent upon you. They you know, they enslaved all of
Speaker 1: your people into their debt system through that where you're
Speaker 1: only paying the interest, and the governments then get to
Speaker 1: borrow on a blank check because it's always going to
Speaker 1: be on the shoulders of the people. Anything that you've
Speaker 1: taken anything that they've borrowed. It all does is destroy
Speaker 1: economies and lives. So once they fix that, then I
Speaker 1: can contemplate caring about their economic system, you know. But
Speaker 1: they don't. And Libya was one of the places that did,
Speaker 1: and look what happened. Germany was on the places that did.
Speaker 1: Do you write by other people, and look what happened.
Speaker 1: Every time an example that's positive crops up. This banking
Speaker 1: cult calls upon America's military might to go destroy it.
Speaker 1: And now Libya is a shithole, and I do mention
Speaker 1: that and there should we just watch it or should
Speaker 1: we just move on? I gotta find out here something
Speaker 1: There's not what I was looking for. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't really get a I don't really watch too
Speaker 1: much of what he does. Honestly, I'm not really on
Speaker 1: the I mean, I'm glad that he doesn't fully adopt
Speaker 1: the whole Trump thing, not even at all anymore. But
Speaker 1: I think some of the other ideas are everybody can
Speaker 1: have their own opinion and we still be friends, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean. And I really like Mike and
Speaker 1: I appreciate them and respect him and all that stuff.
Speaker 1: So I know, I mean, that's somebody I can actually
Speaker 1: text message. I think that's pretty cool, you know that
Speaker 1: he's available like that. And he did give doctor glennon
Speaker 1: a platform that you know, I set up to try
Speaker 1: to set up an interview for him, and that came
Speaker 1: out really nice. So this came out today. It's called
Speaker 1: Masters of the Temple, The Tragedy of Jack Parsons, and
Speaker 1: it's long. I watched. I listened to it mostly didn't
Speaker 1: really watch it because I was working today getting the
Speaker 1: orders done. And wow, so Connor, I think, I don't
Speaker 1: even the name. There's somebody else out there that's waiting
Speaker 1: for a book. And it was the large version of
Speaker 1: the paperback from Amazon that's color, and I ordered some
Speaker 1: more and they said it wasn't going to come in
Speaker 1: it coming until August tenth or the fifteenth. It showed
Speaker 1: up today, so I can get that out to you.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you're listening or not if you will,
Speaker 1: but good news on that. So I got a couple actually,
Speaker 1: if anybody wants the book, I have a couple like
Speaker 1: three left of the Barnes and Noble six by nine
Speaker 1: and then the eight by elevens that are color still
Speaker 1: paperback I have, so those are available on the website.
Speaker 1: And where are we looking? Gotta forget where it was.
Speaker 1: So this was the behind bars thing, and maybe maybe
Speaker 1: we'll play that again. But for people who are already here,
Speaker 1: I don't want to bother them doing that. So let's
Speaker 1: just put watch a little bit of this and I'm
Speaker 1: going to read these things to you too at the
Speaker 1: same time, well home, to make sure that you can
Speaker 1: actually see it again. Yeah, it looks good. Okay. It
Speaker 1: is important for the magus to be acquainted with the
Speaker 1: secrets of science, but he may know them by intuition
Speaker 1: and without formal learning. And I remember this is about
Speaker 1: Jack Parsons, the guy who Aerojet was the name of
Speaker 1: the company before became Jet Propultional Laboratories. But he was
Speaker 1: not even a Caltech student, but he started hanging out
Speaker 1: there trying to get support and funding and equipment because
Speaker 1: he was very interested in chemistry and then into rocketry. Right.
Speaker 1: So here's the thing. When there's a portion of this
Speaker 1: that's deep into the video, talking about the progress that
Speaker 1: they were making, they were working in the war effort
Speaker 1: against those dash Dar Nazis. Come on. Now a theme
Speaker 1: that I don't really care too much to no, no, no,
Speaker 1: I'm get excited about that. Oh anyway, uh, when he
Speaker 1: when he comes up with a solid fuel that has
Speaker 1: to do with roofing tar and some other potassium blah
Speaker 1: blah blah or whatever it was that was able to
Speaker 1: slow burn and we was able to actually do what
Speaker 1: they needed to do in order to shorten the runway
Speaker 1: through through jet propulsion to speed up the plane so
Speaker 1: it could take off. And this was the whole way
Speaker 1: this whole thing started. They were fascinating these types of
Speaker 1: tanks onto planes and then when the plane reached its
Speaker 1: you know, he was able to ascend and uh and
Speaker 1: level out, they would just drop those tanks, kind of
Speaker 1: like when you see a space shuttle. Now they have
Speaker 1: the rockets on the side and then they drop off.
Speaker 1: Who knows. Yeah, I'm not gonna speculate and get into
Speaker 1: all the things I think are completely you know, fabricated
Speaker 1: about space travel and all that stuff, or even leave
Speaker 1: it in our atmosphere. But you get the point. You've
Speaker 1: seen you've been to Cape Carinavil, or you've seen it
Speaker 1: on TV. You know what I'm talking about, or you've
Speaker 1: had the displeasure of living too close to a SpaceX
Speaker 1: like I do and have to watch that every once
Speaker 1: in a while. But here is what this guy says,
Speaker 1: and this is elifis Levi, a major massive occultist that
Speaker 1: again the name is telling as to what type of
Speaker 1: tribe he's from. But it makes me wonder because they're like,
Speaker 1: how did he come up with this idea? And I'm
Speaker 1: thinking because it was part of the invocation. Is that
Speaker 1: intuition that they speak of isn't so much intuition, it's
Speaker 1: the whispering in the year. This is the give and take,
Speaker 1: I think, you know, just like with all these innovations
Speaker 1: that have been coming so rapidly. Either it's a rediscovery
Speaker 1: because we've been to a certain level of civilization many
Speaker 1: times over and it's cyclical and something destroys everything or
Speaker 1: natural or unnatural, regardless of what it is. There's a
Speaker 1: reset and then we get to another stage again. So
Speaker 1: maybe some of that stuff is just rediscovered, like literally
Speaker 1: artifact wise. And then maybe some of this is the
Speaker 1: whole reason why this desire for magic and this devotion
Speaker 1: to black magic and doing all these things is because
Speaker 1: whatever this entity or force is is feeding them information
Speaker 1: to control and dominate, and so these types of innovations
Speaker 1: come by quote unquote intuition, but it's not the intuition
Speaker 1: that you would have from a higher benevolent creator, but
Speaker 1: something quite the opposite, some kind of demonic presence. So
Speaker 1: I think this is alluding to that, and I think
Speaker 1: this is why they pointed this out in the very
Speaker 1: beginning of this episode of the show. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is a documentary and that's from the Doctrine and Ritual
Speaker 1: of Transcendental Magic eighteen fifty six.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: These photographs taken in June of nineteen fifty two show
Speaker 3: Californian police officers serving the wreckage of a home explosion.
Speaker 3: The mystery blast, as the newspapers called it, was so
Speaker 3: violent that its shockwaves shattered the windows of nearby houses.
Speaker 3: The origin of the explosion was traced to the home's
Speaker 3: laundry room, where an investigation uncovered chemicals that were so
Speaker 3: unstable that summer.
Speaker 1: So obviously that wouldn't be those chemicals that are so
Speaker 1: unstable that the guy's got a smirk on his face,
Speaker 1: he's not wearing gloves, and he's holding on to the jar. Obviously,
Speaker 1: this isn't what they're referring to. But this is what
Speaker 1: I always like to point out when they show you
Speaker 1: a picture of something so that you can more easily visualize.
Speaker 1: It's for the those people who can't just you know,
Speaker 1: do that on their own. But you got and then
Speaker 1: sometimes too much stock is put into that the photo
Speaker 1: somehow line up with what they're discussing, and it's not.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is just who knows what the hell
Speaker 1: this is or what portion of the house that they're
Speaker 1: looking at, You know what I mean? If it was volatile,
Speaker 1: this dude wouldn't be standing there without any kind of
Speaker 1: protective gear on touching.
Speaker 3: It had to be shielded from the camera flash before
Speaker 3: a photo could be taken.
Speaker 1: Did you hear that it was so volatile that some
Speaker 1: of the stuff had to be shielded from the photo
Speaker 1: flash before it could be taken because it would ignite.
Speaker 1: That's how volatile some of the chemicals were that they found.
Speaker 3: But the exact point of detonation was found to be
Speaker 3: an old coffee can containing a powder called fulminate of mercury,
Speaker 3: a substance of such volatility that it needed only drop
Speaker 3: a few feet to the ground before igniting, which in
Speaker 3: turn ignited the many chemicals around it. The explosion would
Speaker 3: claim the life of one person, thirty seven year old
Speaker 3: Jack Whiteside Parsons, who is believed to have been the
Speaker 3: one who dropped the coffee can.
Speaker 4: Who is Jack Parsons. Parsons was one of the rocketeers
Speaker 4: attached to Caltech in the nineteen thirties and forties. He
Speaker 4: was a brilliant chemist.
Speaker 3: Jack was known in the rocket science community as an
Speaker 3: explosive specialist. He was described as possessing a self taught
Speaker 3: knowledge of combustible chemicals learn through bold and dangerous experimentation.
Speaker 4: He basically was the fuels person that worked with a
Speaker 4: team of mostly graduate students at that point.
Speaker 3: Throughout his career, Jack reconstructed a car bomb for prosecutors
Speaker 3: and an attempted murder trial based on nothing but blown
Speaker 3: fragments of the original.
Speaker 1: So I want to point this out too. There were
Speaker 1: people who were saying, Oh, this whole rocket treet thing.
Speaker 1: I like, there's there's a point where you have to
Speaker 1: realize that your skepticism is kind of ridiculous. Yeah. I
Speaker 1: understand that space is and that probably is all lies,
Speaker 1: and obviously the moon landing and all this other caraf right,
Speaker 1: but they look at pictures like this, not understanding that
Speaker 1: he's showing a reconstructed bomb, and they say, how could
Speaker 1: something like that be a rocket? And like this, because
Speaker 1: you're not talking about the same thing, though, buddy. You
Speaker 1: know there's one where he's kind of got his hand
Speaker 1: on something on it right here, and he's pulling out
Speaker 1: the wire and he's looking at it, and you're like,
Speaker 1: there's no way he went from that to the I'm like,
Speaker 1: you don't get it. It's just it's just silly the
Speaker 1: way they yah.
Speaker 3: And with a little more than a high school degree,
Speaker 3: Jack solved problems in chemistry that led to some of
Speaker 3: the most important developments in jet propulsion.
Speaker 5: How can you have a guy who knows the dangers
Speaker 5: of the materials with which he works drop it.
Speaker 3: But as tragic as the irony of his death was,
Speaker 3: the case was closed only days after the accident, with
Speaker 3: Jack named both victim and culprit.
Speaker 1: I don't particularly buy that. I mean, it's his life
Speaker 1: was kind of in shambles at the time. Maybe he
Speaker 1: was being careless, but I don't think that that's all
Speaker 1: that he was recruited by, and the reason why he
Speaker 1: didn't work for Israel and their propulsion, you know, efforts
Speaker 1: to build their you know what defense, Right, he started
Speaker 1: showing them papers of things that he was working on
Speaker 1: that were classified, and a clerk of his own whom
Speaker 1: he was either I don't know, copying pages of it
Speaker 1: for them or whatever, notified the FBI and had that
Speaker 1: whole deal with him working for Israel shut down. That
Speaker 1: could have potentially pissed off Israel and whomever else in
Speaker 1: our government to do what happened to him? Who knows?
Speaker 1: Who knows what the real reason is. Could it have
Speaker 1: been another ocultists I don't know, could have been freaking
Speaker 1: out Ron Herbert or one of his lugs, who knows.
Speaker 3: But as Pasadying and police were sifting through the wreckage,
Speaker 3: they found something that forever changed how Jack Parsons would
Speaker 3: be remembered. Inside his home, unharmed by the explosion, was
Speaker 3: a handcrafted wooden box. The symbols attached to the outside
Speaker 3: were unrecognizable to all but a select few, and the
Speaker 3: interwoven text was written in a century's old language said
Speaker 3: to be ancient celestial speech. Inside the box were years
Speaker 3: worth of Jack's personal writings, with each page containing a
Speaker 3: clue as to who Jack really was and who he
Speaker 3: believed himself to be the private life of one of
Speaker 3: America's first rocket scientists is something few understand today, but
Speaker 3: even fewer understood at the time of his death. But
Speaker 3: insides are found.
Speaker 1: He could have been a movie star these days, right,
Speaker 1: Good look at dude. What they don't talk about in
Speaker 1: this video that I listened to and watched the whole day,
Speaker 1: the whole thing through. They never once mentioned that part
Speaker 1: of his rights and rituals that he was conducting and
Speaker 1: his dilemmaic practices involved sex with his mother and his dog.
Speaker 1: He really loved that dog.
Speaker 3: And exploring the beliefs and practices he dedicated himself to,
Speaker 3: in examining the private correspondence of his inner circle who
Speaker 3: formed this secret society in which he belonged, and in
Speaker 3: Jack's own writing as he documented his ascent through their
Speaker 3: spiritual system. This is the story of Jack Parsons, or
Speaker 3: as he was called by some freighter Bealerion.
Speaker 1: You know, hm and ritualistic self harm. Okay.
Speaker 3: In the days that follow Jack's accident, word of his
Speaker 3: death began to trickle through a French religious community that
Speaker 3: American media referred to as the Purple Cult.
Speaker 1: Now I find that very very interesting. I did not
Speaker 1: know that they were ever known by that name. But
Speaker 1: if you think of Medea, if you think of L
Speaker 1: from the Eda, the purple that Amine Hillman is obsessed
Speaker 1: with Medea was a composite or was a reference to
Speaker 1: L so that we call it adders venom or snake
Speaker 1: venom type of drug was a part of the cult
Speaker 1: of the serpent wolf cult going all the way back
Speaker 1: five thousand years. That's what they were messing around with.
Speaker 1: So this stuff was around for quite a long time.
Speaker 1: And that that purple, I don't think we're just talking
Speaker 1: about Phoenician or some sort of a royalty color, color
Speaker 1: of royalty. I think the purple is is describing or
Speaker 1: is a reference to Pharmakiah and black magic, going back
Speaker 1: to as far back as people can go before things
Speaker 1: get littery.
Speaker 3: It's name usually accompany descriptions of coffin shape altars and
Speaker 3: rituals performed by costumed citizens of Los Angeles, California, but
Speaker 3: the community itself preferred the name Thelamites, meaning adherence to
Speaker 3: the religion of the Lima, a word derived from the
Speaker 3: classical Greek for divine will. It was a belief system
Speaker 3: that had only been around for approximately forty years, with
Speaker 3: its membership numbered in the dozens. It includes traditions such
Speaker 3: as specific prayers before mules, funeral customs, holidays celebrated to
Speaker 3: commemorate important dates, and a central Holy Book to which
Speaker 3: all believers adhere and.
Speaker 1: Don't forget about cakes of light with mentional blood, yeah ya,
Speaker 1: and fecal matter.
Speaker 3: While Los Angeles had been its nucleus for much of
Speaker 3: the nineteen thirties, forties, and fifties, its believers were spread
Speaker 3: across the world, operating alone or in small groups, and
Speaker 3: communicating with one another by mail. Among the first to
Speaker 3: break the news of Jack's death was a Thelamite named
Speaker 3: Jane Wolfe, an actress living in Los Angeles who'd appeared
Speaker 3: in over ninety films throughout Hollywood silent era. Jack was
Speaker 3: killed yesterday while experimenting with chemicals. Jane wrote, I will
Speaker 3: keep you informed if there is any further news. The
Speaker 3: letter's recipient was for.
Speaker 1: The news, like yeah, he's still dead, like no change
Speaker 1: in his condition. For the news was.
Speaker 3: Carl Germer, a Holocaust survivor living in New York who'd
Speaker 3: been a Thlamite for nearly thirty years. I am deeply sorry,
Speaker 3: was his response. I had pinned great hopes on Jack,
Speaker 3: but I must confess I remained skeptical about his attainment
Speaker 3: of his having crossed the abyss. Jack's tenure as Athelamite
Speaker 3: is best described as complicated, with his approach to Thelemic practices,
Speaker 3: leaving many of his peers puzzled. But from Jack's perspective,
Speaker 3: he had become the religions. His new prophet chosen to
Speaker 3: bring mankind under the law of Thelema. In his personal writings,
Speaker 3: Jack described his childhood as isolated. He grew up in
Speaker 3: the suburbs of Pasadena, California, estranged from his military father,
Speaker 3: and when writing of his relationship.
Speaker 1: I think that's important too that a lot of these
Speaker 1: people that are influential, highly influential, whether it's the sixties
Speaker 1: era music or so on, they all have some sort
Speaker 1: of connection to military or military intelligence.
Speaker 3: His mother, he repeatedly used the phrase Oedipus complex.
Speaker 1: So he straight up said that he wanted to bring
Speaker 1: his mom since he was young. What does that mean?
Speaker 1: Exactly what that means?
Speaker 3: But Jack found comfort in what was at the time
Speaker 3: little more than a backyard hobby, the act of setting
Speaker 3: off projectiles with gunpowder and watching them slice through the sky.
Speaker 3: Would you mind introducing yourself.
Speaker 4: Sure, I'm Roger Launius. I'm a historian. I spent a
Speaker 4: career working in federal history programs, part of that time
Speaker 4: for the Air Force, a fair amount of it for
Speaker 4: NASA as the chief historian in then the Smithsonian Institution's
Speaker 4: National Air and Space Museum.
Speaker 3: Can you describe the state of the field of rocket
Speaker 3: science prior to the nineteen forties.
Speaker 4: Well, sure, rocketry is being pursued literally around the world.
Speaker 4: There is a lot of people who are engaged in experimentation.
Speaker 4: Some of that experimentation is very simply amateur rocketeers who
Speaker 4: were out sort of building rockets on evenings and weekends
Speaker 4: and then eagle out and launch them. Those are not
Speaker 4: necessarily very long arge they don't necessarily fly very high.
Speaker 4: But this was a worldwide phenomenon.
Speaker 3: Jack's passion for amateur rocketry would only deepen into early adulthood,
Speaker 3: and in nineteen thirty five, he and childhood friend Ed
Speaker 3: Foreman found themselves searching for fellow enthusiasts in their hometown
Speaker 3: at the California Institute of Technology. Neither Parsons nor Foreman
Speaker 3: were enrolled at Caltech, but their exuberance and hands on
Speaker 3: experience earned them an introduction to a PhD candidate named
Speaker 3: Frank Molina, who was researching rocket propulsion for his graduate thesis.
Speaker 3: Frank Molina would later write his impression of the meeting.
Speaker 3: Parsons was a self trained chemist too, although he lacked
Speaker 3: the discipline of a formal higher education, had an uninhibited
Speaker 3: and fruitful imagination.
Speaker 1: That's the picture I'm talking about. Viz reconstructed the bomb
Speaker 1: off out of fragments somebody had blown up a police
Speaker 1: chief or something like that.
Speaker 3: He loved poetry and the exotic aspects of life form
Speaker 3: and a skilled mechanic. Had been working with Parsons for
Speaker 3: some time on powder rockets. They wished to build a
Speaker 3: liquid propellant rocket motor, but found that they lacked the
Speaker 3: adequate technical and financial resources. They hoped to find help
Speaker 3: at cal Tech. They were sent to me, and then
Speaker 3: this story began. What were their goals as a group, You.
Speaker 4: Know, mostly they wanted to explore space, and that's true
Speaker 4: for literally around the world folks who were engaged in this.
Speaker 4: A lot of them had been brought up reading Jules
Speaker 4: Verne and H. G. Wells and these other science fiction
Speaker 4: writers seeing movies that depicted this sort of thing, and
Speaker 4: they were excited by that.
Speaker 3: Frank Molina's university.
Speaker 1: Dude that looks like a acidic tube pops out of
Speaker 1: that canister, just saying that's funny. Oh my god.
Speaker 3: City Connections granted them after hours access to Caltech's Guggenheim
Speaker 3: Aeronautical Laboratory, and they got to work right away. One
Speaker 3: of their early objectives was to break the rocket altitude record,
Speaker 3: which stood at eight thousand feet set by their American contemporary,
Speaker 3: Robert Goddard. Jack had ideas he was eager to try,
Speaker 3: such as a concept p and Foreman called the machine
Speaker 3: gun rocket, named after its approach of firing a quick
Speaker 3: series of miniature gunpowder explosions, which would propel the projectile skyward,
Speaker 3: one small burst.
Speaker 1: At a time.
Speaker 3: They'd bragged the newspapers that the machine gun rocket would
Speaker 3: nearly double Goddard's record, but they had underestimated the engineering
Speaker 3: required to automatically reload the spent cartridges while the rocket
Speaker 3: was in flight.
Speaker 4: The reality is that in the latter nineteen thirties, when
Speaker 4: Molina and his colleagues were engaged in this activity. There
Speaker 4: wasn't a lot of knowledge that existed in the United States.
Speaker 2: No one knew how to build a rocket for boxes.
Speaker 1: As Chris go on, it.
Speaker 5: Either liquid or solid.
Speaker 3: Rudy. That was.
Speaker 5: Very satisfactory.
Speaker 6: So it meant that actually the people, those of us
Speaker 6: here were really calling upon our own resources.
Speaker 3: When the Trio tried to compare notes with Robert Goddard,
Speaker 3: who was testing rocket engines in Roswell, New Mexico, they
Speaker 3: found him secretive and unwilling to disclose the results of
Speaker 3: his private trials. But as their experiments at Calti continued,
Speaker 3: they attracted more graduate students to join them, slowly expanding
Speaker 3: the group's range of skills. How did the members of
Speaker 3: the crew divide up duties in order to make the
Speaker 3: most of their individual talents.
Speaker 4: It was pretty informal. They worked under the auspices, mostly
Speaker 4: of Frank Molina, who had a lot of capabilities and
Speaker 4: was a truly good leader. Each of them had various
Speaker 4: areas that they focused on, propulsion, aerodynamics, electronics, control systems,
Speaker 4: and so forth. And they did all this sort of
Speaker 4: on an ad hoc basis. And they're building rockets and
Speaker 4: not very large, and they're building these things. Informally, it
Speaker 4: was all voluntary. They just did it because they were interested.
Speaker 3: In Jack was the group's chemist. Although he lacked the
Speaker 3: higher education of many of his colleagues, he brought practical
Speaker 3: experience from working in a local explosive powder company, combined
Speaker 3: with the knowledge from his own amateur experiments, and with
Speaker 3: the help of Caltex facilities, Jack generated detailed reference charts
Speaker 3: of potential fuel sources. Cataloging has searched for the most
Speaker 3: effective combination of ingredient.
Speaker 1: Hexane is listed as one of the potential ingredients for
Speaker 1: propulsion system Hexaane is also what they treat seed oils with,
Speaker 1: and it's highly carcinogenic.
Speaker 3: Ingredients. Putting these mixtures to the test often resulted in
Speaker 3: spontaneous explosions and outbreaks of fire, But equally dane were
Speaker 3: the noxious fumes that the burning fuel would produce. In
Speaker 3: one botched experiment, the crew attached a small rocket motor
Speaker 3: to a pendulum in order to measure the force of
Speaker 3: its thrust, but this resulted in what Frank Molina described
Speaker 3: as a big cloud of this corrosive nitrogen tetroxide, which
Speaker 3: permeated the entire building and rusted all the metallic services
Speaker 3: it encountered. How dangerous was their work?
Speaker 4: Well, they had a nickname for themselves. They referred to
Speaker 4: themselves as a suicide squad.
Speaker 3: The suicide Squad was the beginning of a historical odyssey
Speaker 3: for Jack Parsons. It was also the start of an
Speaker 3: intensely personal journey, which Headlines would later call Jack's double life.
Speaker 1: Let me just pause us here for a second and
Speaker 1: get I gotta ask a question here, No, Brad, I don't. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the Smithsonian is definitely bearing more artifacts than they ever
Speaker 1: dig up. That's for sure, controlling historical evidence that challenges
Speaker 1: any narrative that the you know who cult is involved with. Sayeh,
Speaker 1: I call it, yes, it was yeah Gadafi's speech. So
Speaker 1: this is two hours long. Someone report back if they
Speaker 1: want to continue this, or I can just go onto
Speaker 1: something else. But I I am my next. Why isn't
Speaker 1: that showing? M oh it is, it's just not showing
Speaker 1: the actual number. I fear a cow is not available
Speaker 1: for that one. Interesting. I'll play a little bit more
Speaker 1: of this and then I'll back again, and let's see
Speaker 1: do I have a visual on that one? Let's see, Oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: that one is of course, let's do this. I'll play
Speaker 1: a little bit more of this. Okay, that was Joe. Okay, cool.
Speaker 1: So it is kind of incorporating everything into the one one,
Speaker 1: so I don't have to really go back and forth
Speaker 1: through it. So it is showing so yeah, cool, all right, good,
Speaker 1: I don't I don't have to dance back and forth.
Speaker 1: Everybody's chat is in the same life chat thing. No,
Speaker 1: it's all good, man. I know I should have tried
Speaker 1: to start earlier. Where's My daughter came home and I,
Speaker 1: you know, I had to make sure that she was
Speaker 1: all set up and good, and she went for like
Speaker 1: this homeschool type of nature thing that she was with
Speaker 1: friends with and Rebecca was away, so I had to
Speaker 1: take care of that. And I wanted to obviously make
Speaker 1: sure that she was greeted at the door that's good stuff,
Speaker 1: and set her up with whatever she wanted to entertain herself.
Speaker 1: And then I came back in here and then I
Speaker 1: found out that there was no audio at least you
Speaker 1: were hearing the video, and I don't want to play
Speaker 1: that one again. But like I said, it's called behind
Speaker 1: bars ba r R S as in bill bar. Oh
Speaker 1: maybe just yeah, you know, fuck it. Let's just keep
Speaker 1: going with this one for now. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: really interesting. There's things along the way. Like for the
Speaker 1: most part, it's me just sitting watching it with you.
Speaker 1: There are times where I'll say, hey, there's something interesting
Speaker 1: about this that should be explored more. But listen, letk
Speaker 1: just read what this says. Here. It says then it
Speaker 1: bothers me so much. It says spears Vinslila's clash parallel,
Speaker 1: I says Hi Nazi and fascist officials, as if either
Speaker 1: of those two things are bad, said to the dictator.
Speaker 1: The two said ad dictator. Hi Nazi fascist officials said,
Speaker 1: the two dictators who will make speeches in Venice Square
Speaker 1: at neither blah blah blah. I have abandoned all thought
Speaker 1: of a military alliance, at least for the present, because
Speaker 1: they are convinced they can obtain their desires without resorting
Speaker 1: to war. They fascism was against Bolshevism, all right. National
Speaker 1: socialism was against Bolshevism communism. In any other world where
Speaker 1: things aren't framed in the inverted it would be good
Speaker 1: values and trades to have is to be anti communism,
Speaker 1: anti Bolshevik murder. But hey, when they are the winners.
Speaker 1: Then all the heroes become demons and everybody sees them
Speaker 1: as such. Say see Premire Benito Mussolini. And if you're
Speaker 1: adaf Hitler reported early today to have agreed on a
Speaker 1: trade whereby il duce, we'll let Hitler pursue his ambitions
Speaker 1: and Czechoslovakia in exchange for prior economic con concessions in Spain. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was a suspended Los Angeles police earl. Yeah, who
Speaker 1: cares about that? Threat was made over telephone? Yeah, so yeah,
Speaker 1: and here he is.
Speaker 3: In nineteen thirty eight, Jack became a local celebrity after
Speaker 3: a team of prosecutors visited cal Tech in search of
Speaker 3: an explosive specialist to testify in a car bombing trial.
Speaker 3: Following an inspection of the crime scene, twenty three year
Speaker 3: old Jack rebuilt the bomb, explained to the courtroom how
Speaker 3: the device operated, and re enacted the explosion. His testimony
Speaker 3: helped put three culprits in prison and introduced Jack to
Speaker 3: the public as an explosives expert. As his early career
Speaker 3: began to gain momentum, he found companionship with a woman
Speaker 3: named Helen Northrop, a private and rarely photographed person who
Speaker 3: was described by those who knew or as good natured
Speaker 3: and intelligent. The two met at a Baptist church dance,
Speaker 3: and within a year they were married. Despite the environment
Speaker 3: of their introduction, neither Jack nor Helen described themselves as
Speaker 3: particularly religious.
Speaker 7: When we first met to Pasady and lived there, we
Speaker 7: joined and I was baptized into the Baptist Church. But
Speaker 7: it didn't mean anything joy.
Speaker 6: Unfortunately, I guess some of the doors I didn't open
Speaker 6: that could have that I could have.
Speaker 3: Jack's personal writing states that he developed a resistance to
Speaker 3: Christianity at a young age due to his contempt for
Speaker 3: the crowd and unfortunate experiences with other children. But in
Speaker 3: his early adulthood, Jack discovered a curious book of religious
Speaker 3: essays on a friend's bookshelf. Its title was congsom pas
Speaker 3: and it served as one of the earliest texts in
Speaker 3: developing the religion of Filima.
Speaker 1: The Rosicrucian Mound of whatever those initiation.
Speaker 3: Although its message was shrouded and allegory, the owner of
Speaker 3: the book considered it little more than an oddity, but
Speaker 3: would describe Jack's impression of it as real water to
Speaker 3: a thirsty man. Jack soon became captivated by its author,
Speaker 3: an enigmatic English occultist named Alistair Crowley.
Speaker 1: And I believe in the serpent and the Lion midy
Speaker 1: serpent right there. Again, These aren't just oh yeah, you
Speaker 1: know people bring up No, there's there's a there's a
Speaker 1: real stopping point there to be like, okay, so is
Speaker 1: all this connected? Are they tapping into something? Do the
Speaker 1: secret societies maintain and keep an unbroken chain of knowledge
Speaker 1: that goes back as far as the EDA does? And
Speaker 1: are they still conducting their private war there there? Obviously
Speaker 1: they're adamant about destroying European people. Who do they represent
Speaker 1: the same people that they encountered in Mesopotamia, the Goths,
Speaker 1: the Germanic people, Gothics, you know, Gothic and if you
Speaker 1: want to call them Norsemen. These are all what they
Speaker 1: then referred to as Indo European because they can't say
Speaker 1: that a word, which is basically the nobility class of
Speaker 1: the Goths. And this is that war, and this cult
Speaker 1: represents the the evil side of that. That's the that's
Speaker 1: the freaking same Saturn or if you want to call
Speaker 1: it the Serpent Wolf cult, the Saturn Moon cult. They
Speaker 1: are Moony's for sure. I mean they are. They're talking
Speaker 1: about in their passages that they will live on the
Speaker 1: moon in their afterlife and things like that. There's all
Speaker 1: kinds of strangeness that they say, but it all makes
Speaker 1: sense when you understand where it's coming from and the
Speaker 1: fact that it has survived. It just takes on different
Speaker 1: names in different forms. But the core, you know, elements
Speaker 1: of it are always the same, Practices are always the same.
Speaker 1: The darkness of it is always the same. To me,
Speaker 1: that means that something's feeding it. So whatever they're whatever
Speaker 1: they're tapping into is a very real thing, not a
Speaker 1: good thing. So does that imply that the opposite is
Speaker 1: also true and real? Well, I believe in a benovolent
Speaker 1: greater even if I don't buy anything else that's said
Speaker 1: about it, you know, if I don't have to except
Speaker 1: the indoctrination of any religion in order to firmly, no,
Speaker 1: not just believe that there is a benevolent force, a creator.
Speaker 1: I think existence and of itself and the ability to
Speaker 1: love and feel compassionate for others is evidence enough for.
Speaker 6: That history of mystery in his name back one Jack
Speaker 6: learned that Aleister Crowley had a small group of followers
Speaker 6: only ten miles from Pasadena, who operated a church out
Speaker 6: of the attic of a house in East Hollywood.
Speaker 3: Every Sunday, its members would conduct a public performance of
Speaker 3: a ritual that Crowley had written to encapsulate his philosophies,
Speaker 3: called the Gnostic Mass. At the time, this attic was
Speaker 3: the only place.
Speaker 1: In that cobra. I know it's Egyptian in nature, but
Speaker 1: what part of the timeline of Egyptian culture are we
Speaker 1: looking at? And is it after the infiltration or the
Speaker 1: corruption and the turn to dark practices that occurred in
Speaker 1: Egypt that caused it to fall that we have these serpents,
Speaker 1: as in the Serpent cult being exemplified. And you know,
Speaker 1: I think all of this has meaning. I don't think
Speaker 1: it's just get up and gowns. I think all of
Speaker 1: it has meaning. And then I think it all points
Speaker 1: back as evidence to the real truth that is depicted.
Speaker 1: I mean, why would they cover all those reliefs from
Speaker 1: consumer to Persia, to Egypt to the Indus Valley, all
Speaker 1: the places that are people went that this cult later
Speaker 1: would corrupt. Why would that all be I mean it too,
Speaker 1: it's too much evidence to say that that story that
Speaker 1: Elie Widdell was able to decipher. Isn't correct. I think
Speaker 1: it's I think it's obvious that it's one hundred percent
Speaker 1: on the mark. There's probably more to say about it,
Speaker 1: more to discover about it. But I think what Eli
Speaker 1: Widdell did show us is all on point.
Speaker 3: In the world where the Gnostic Mass was performed, and
Speaker 3: only a few photographs of these performances still exist. But
Speaker 3: over the past century modern thlemic churches have appeared across
Speaker 3: the country, and many of them have uploaded their own
Speaker 3: performances using the same style of costume, temple furnishings and
Speaker 3: script used in the original.
Speaker 8: I believe in one secret and ineffable Lord, and in
Speaker 8: one Star.
Speaker 1: In the benevolent creators aren't in the shadows, they don't
Speaker 1: need to keep secrets.
Speaker 8: And company of stars up whose fire we are created
Speaker 8: and to which we shall return. And in one Father
Speaker 8: of life, mystery of mystery, in his name.
Speaker 3: Chaos as incoming visitors, Jack and Helen would have likely
Speaker 3: been handed a copy of the script in order to
Speaker 3: play the part of the audience.
Speaker 2: And I believe in.
Speaker 8: One Earth, the Mother of us all.
Speaker 1: And in one womb wherein all men.
Speaker 6: Are begotten and wherein they shall rest.
Speaker 1: Mystery of mystery, and that makes it a matriarchicult to
Speaker 1: talk about a womb from which they are born, in
Speaker 1: which they will rest. L Heidi the person who was
Speaker 1: the inspiration for Lilith Medea Colley hecatea Tiamat Tiamat who,
Speaker 1: by the way, if it's either red wrong or if
Speaker 1: it's turned into it mythologized, has a form of a
Speaker 1: serpent as well, and that's Babylonian. But this happened prior
Speaker 1: to that, so Elle was the influence for all of
Speaker 1: those things. Even if Elle was forgotten, a form of
Speaker 1: her wasn't you know, So all of the characteristics, attributes,
Speaker 1: and traits carried on even if the original was lost
Speaker 1: to I mean, these people don't understand that, these people
Speaker 1: that are conducting these masses and are believing this thing,
Speaker 1: they don't. I'm sure they don't understand the history that's
Speaker 1: been lost that Padella dug up literally, but it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter because that same energy and the message, the frequency,
Speaker 1: it's just still resonating. They find it very interesting.
Speaker 2: Her name Babylon.
Speaker 3: The performance last around forty minutes and it opens with
Speaker 3: many Masonic gestures and ceremonial accouterments whose meaning would be
Speaker 3: mysterious to first time viewers like Jack and Helen. But
Speaker 3: as the mass continues, it becomes sexually suggestive, and at
Speaker 3: the midway point, the priestess removes her costume entirely. At
Speaker 3: the close of the performance, audience members are invited to
Speaker 3: partake in communion, but rather than a sip of wine
Speaker 3: from a communal cup, attendees or asked to each drink
Speaker 3: an entire goblet themselves. The ingredients of the wafer of
Speaker 3: bread include blood, which could be from various sources.
Speaker 1: That's the cakes of light dis mentioned blood they call
Speaker 1: it the moon blood or whatever, and fecal matter.
Speaker 3: According to Alister Crowley's writing, the best blood is of
Speaker 3: the moon monthly, then the fresh blood of a child
Speaker 3: or dropping from the host of.
Speaker 1: Heaven, so mentionual blood is the preferred then blood of
Speaker 1: a child. And they want an apologists want to say
Speaker 1: that when Crowley claimed that for one hundred and twenty five,
Speaker 1: for one hundred and twenty five days or in a year,
Speaker 1: every other day type of thing sacrificed a boy child,
Speaker 1: that they're saying that that had something to do with masturbation.
Speaker 1: And that it's all bullshit. It's all bullshit.
Speaker 3: Heaven, then of enemies, then of the priest or the worshipers,
Speaker 3: last of some beast. No matter what, the blood is
Speaker 3: burned to ash and mixed into the ingredients. A vegetarian
Speaker 3: substitute is often provided.
Speaker 4: We asked that all present or take of a wafer
Speaker 4: of bread.
Speaker 1: That's hilarious, because there's you anything more evil than the
Speaker 1: blood ceremony would be to be a fucking vegan.
Speaker 7: Ass of either wine or grape juice. If you are
Speaker 7: not prepared to consume the Eucharist today, we thank you
Speaker 7: for coming and respectfully ask you to lean at this time.
Speaker 3: After consuming the Eucharist, each attendee is asked to stand
Speaker 3: in front of the congregation and declare, there is no
Speaker 3: part of me that is not of the Gods. After
Speaker 3: the performance, the parsons were introduced to the members of
Speaker 3: the church. Among them was film actress Jane Wolfe, dance
Speaker 3: instructor and priestess Regina Call, and gas company clerk Wilfrid Smith,
Speaker 3: who served as the group's priest. The church had existed
Speaker 3: in Los Angeles for about four years, and its primary
Speaker 3: function was to operate as the American lodge of an
Speaker 3: international Masonic organization called the Ordo Templi orientis commonly abbreviated
Speaker 3: as the OTO.
Speaker 4: Would you mind introducing yourself.
Speaker 5: I'm David Choemaker. I am a clinical psychologist in private practice.
Speaker 1: Does that name sound like I remember? This is all
Speaker 1: based on learning Kabala.
Speaker 5: It's in North Carolina. I've also been involved in the
Speaker 5: LIMA and multiple organizations within that in the teaching and
Speaker 5: studying capacity for just about thirty years now.
Speaker 3: David Shoemaker is one of the principal voices of modern Thalma.
Speaker 1: To you catch you, He's a psychiatrist, another evil practice
Speaker 1: of freaking pharm, mackey and bullshit.
Speaker 3: He holds a leadership position across the OTO temples throughout
Speaker 3: the United States as.
Speaker 1: Well as here's a good time to reference this. Let
Speaker 1: me show you something. Let me show you something because
Speaker 1: I know back when they see if he took it
Speaker 1: them all down. Let's see if I can find it.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's in the shop. Where's the oh, I don't
Speaker 1: see the wand anymore? The anal emma, the analemma, stupid
Speaker 1: wand that's supposed to uh this h it's not just
Speaker 1: it's not structured water. It's it's some other word. Whether
Speaker 1: they say, and this is this uh, this wand this
Speaker 1: crystal wand with this water in it is supposed to
Speaker 1: energize your water. Doesn't filter it, it doesn't it doesn't
Speaker 1: purify it. But it's supposed to be like the best
Speaker 1: water you can have. And all you have to do
Speaker 1: is pay one hundred and eighty five dollars for a
Speaker 1: stupid fucking stick of water. And it's all very occultic.
Speaker 1: And when he was selling these things, his website was
Speaker 1: full of symbols, symbols and like ruine like symbols and
Speaker 1: all kinds of symbols. And I don't see it anymore.
Speaker 1: Let's see if I can find out a different. Uh,
Speaker 1: there is so here it is wants the Anlema wand
Speaker 1: is portable tool that transforms rego water into supercharged, full
Speaker 1: spectrum coherent state. That's what they're saying. There's a coherent water,
Speaker 1: whatever the fuck that means, unlocking enormous health benefits. And
Speaker 1: this is what it looks like. And it's one hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety nine dollars. It's gone up in the luxury
Speaker 1: one with a little freaking box for it. Well, that
Speaker 1: one's two hundred and forty nine hours and then they
Speaker 1: all now they have one for your garden. Oh nice,
Speaker 1: you can put on your spout if this isn't fucking
Speaker 1: pure bullshit. I he did a whole thing on this before.
Speaker 1: I made a whole video on this. I think I
Speaker 1: showed his site there. But I'm not seeing him being
Speaker 1: affiliated with this anymore. And I'll see I don't see
Speaker 1: Andrew Coffin here anymore. But he was selling it. There
Speaker 1: was a whole video on it. I put it all
Speaker 1: in an old video. Yeah, he's gone a different direction.
Speaker 1: Oh let's see chileing ja. No, I'm not seeing it.
Speaker 1: I mean he said a lot of wonderful things. In
Speaker 1: the very beginning. He brought up the coach postularly, he
Speaker 1: brought up the rivers. He actually had a video called
Speaker 1: The Rooster and the River of Rats, and that was
Speaker 1: discussing how the scientific method was not being utilized to
Speaker 1: you know, substantiate the claims of COVID nineteen. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: was all very good. I reposted that video. But then
Speaker 1: he went on some wild, stupid shit. And he's a
Speaker 1: psychiatrist as well, guaranteed he's an ocultistops what I just do?
Speaker 1: There we go.
Speaker 3: It's training for many of the systems, rituals, and practices.
Speaker 5: OTO is basically growing out of a structure that is
Speaker 5: loosely based on Freemasonry, and so the instructional method of
Speaker 5: OTO is primarily through its ritual initiations and study and pray.
Speaker 1: Get the sleeve of the leg of his pants pulled
Speaker 1: showing one breast. This is all straight out of the
Speaker 1: Freemasonic initiation.
Speaker 5: Ecisode of the principles that are inculcated through those.
Speaker 3: The meaning behind the OTO's ritual performances are hidden in symbolism,
Speaker 3: making them inaccessible to outsiders, but the order's manifesto offers
Speaker 3: this as its overall purpose. The aims of the OTO
Speaker 3: can only be understood fully by its highest initiates. But
Speaker 3: it may be said openly.
Speaker 1: That it these people don't They don't possess something spiritual, magical,
Speaker 1: or even in the right direction. It's taking you off
Speaker 1: the path into something much darker.
Speaker 3: Teaches hermetic science or occult knowledge, the pure and holy
Speaker 3: magic of light, the secrets of mystic attainment, Yoga of
Speaker 3: all forms, and all other branches of the secret wisdom
Speaker 3: of the ancients end quote, while the origins of the
Speaker 3: order can be traced back to the European Freemasons of
Speaker 3: the late eighteen hundreds. After Alistair Crowley took leadership in
Speaker 3: the early twentieth century, the Oto began to form its
Speaker 3: own own identity as the first and only Masonic body
Speaker 3: to place the religion of Thalma at the center of
Speaker 3: its belief system.
Speaker 5: It's also a socially oriented order, so there's explicit aims
Speaker 5: of social change, introducing the Lima into the world more broadly,
Speaker 5: into the culture, attempting to infuse the Limic values, Limic
Speaker 5: principles in the culture itself, politics and social organisations.
Speaker 1: Right infiltration and terraforming, so that you're more like this,
Speaker 1: what do you think they're doing to your children's and
Speaker 1: the perversions that they are bringing about.
Speaker 5: Patients and so on.
Speaker 3: At the time of Jack and Helen's introduction, the religion
Speaker 3: of the Lima had yet to permeate American culture. What
Speaker 3: little was known by the general public was found in
Speaker 3: international tabloids portraying a group of occultists who are guided
Speaker 3: by a single ominous declaration, do.
Speaker 6: Without wilt shall be the whole of the law.
Speaker 8: Love is the Law Love under Will.
Speaker 3: Those who attended the church were invited to take home
Speaker 3: copies of Alestair Crowley's writing in order to study the
Speaker 3: law of the Lima for themselves. The experience left a
Speaker 3: mixed first impression on the Parsons. In his autobiographical writing,
Speaker 3: Jack would describe alternating feelings of repulsion and attraction, which
Speaker 3: he ascribed to quote a subconscious resistance against the ordeals ahead.
Speaker 1: All right, so you know the name of it. This
Speaker 1: goes on for much much longer than I played it for.
Speaker 1: So it is called Master of the Temple, the Tragedy
Speaker 1: of Jack Parsons. It's very interesting. You got a taste
Speaker 1: of it there, and that's that. I think today we
Speaker 1: will go into the interview. This is not the right page.
Speaker 1: I'm just looking at something right now. Oh wait, don't
Speaker 1: get to look at that. Okay, maybe on this page.
Speaker 1: All right, we're slid out. We're into it again. I
Speaker 1: pretty much have done an hour and thirty because of
Speaker 1: the thirty minutes that was lost. Let's throw on to
Speaker 1: Mike Adams one. I'll act to play it right from
Speaker 1: his his rubble. You can tell me what you think.
Speaker 1: I highly encourage you if you guys are friends of
Speaker 1: the show to leave a comment on this video of
Speaker 1: his Okay, I don't know why. I just sounds like
Speaker 1: the right thing to do.
Speaker 2: Welcome to today's interview here on bridetion dot com. I'm
Speaker 2: Mike Adams, the health ranger and the founder of Brighton,
Speaker 2: and we've got a very special guest today, returning guest
Speaker 2: that we've interviewed several times, and he's uh. I just
Speaker 2: want to say up front, he's he's on the road.
Speaker 2: He's not in his normal studios, so the video setting
Speaker 2: isn't as great as it normally is, but that doesn't
Speaker 2: matter what His mind is just as sharp as ever.
Speaker 2: And the topic for today is a really important topic
Speaker 2: for our time because here in the United States, our
Speaker 2: government is infested with a mind virus, and the mind
Speaker 2: virus tells them. You see this with people like Senator
Speaker 2: Ted Cruz, or with many of Trump's people or Trumpet.
Speaker 1: Let me just say I had I have no idea
Speaker 1: most of the time what we're going to talk about.
Speaker 1: This was no exception, so I am not able to
Speaker 1: you know, if there's something I don't quite know enough about,
Speaker 1: I don't have the opportunity to you know, have some
Speaker 1: advanced knowledge so that I can go look for it.
Speaker 1: Like there are certain topics that are brought up that
Speaker 1: that could be brought up that, you know, before I
Speaker 1: could form an opinion or wonder if it's even worth
Speaker 1: the effort to form an opinion and whether it's and
Speaker 1: if it's not just another distraction. I don't have that
Speaker 1: opportunity to know in advance. So I think that should
Speaker 1: be at least stated before we go any further.
Speaker 2: So the mind virus says that you must be obedient
Speaker 2: to Israel because Israel, a different version of Israel was
Speaker 2: mentioned in the Bible. Like Senator Ted Cruz says, well,
Speaker 2: I was taught by you know, in Bible school that
Speaker 2: we have to love Israel so that God loves us.
Speaker 2: And but was the Bible writing.
Speaker 1: About selfly convenient at least the way they've it reinterpreted it.
Speaker 1: But even if they didn't reinterpret it again, why are
Speaker 1: we over complicating the concept of a benevolent creator and
Speaker 1: no need for a middle man and no hoops to jump?
Speaker 1: If you're saying true to what you know is write
Speaker 1: and good, any other additional you know demands on you
Speaker 1: should be met with skepticism as being potentially Oh, I
Speaker 1: don't know the desires of man, you know, manipulating you
Speaker 1: jeby church? Does this not just the way.
Speaker 2: Vease netan Yahoo of twenty twenty five and the mass
Speaker 2: slaughter and genocide of Palestinian women and children and civilians,
Speaker 2: I doubt it. Here to help us answer some of
Speaker 2: these issues and bring clarity is Daniel Christos and his
Speaker 2: website is called semper fry llc dot com. Will show
Speaker 2: you that here, Yes, semper fry fry llc dot com.
Speaker 2: And Daniel joins us from the road. That's why his
Speaker 2: video is not the normal studio video. But welcome Daniel
Speaker 2: to the show today. Thanks for joining us.
Speaker 7: Thank you Mike.
Speaker 1: I'm wondering if he's training somebody and editing the flashing.
Speaker 1: It's like, you know, in the cutaways from the person
Speaker 1: who's usually the person who's talking, you have the camera,
Speaker 1: so a lot of times it'll be Mike sitting there
Speaker 1: like this, and then I'm talking and then vice versa.
Speaker 1: And that's usually not how these videos if it's that go,
Speaker 1: So it makes me wonder if he's like interning somebody
Speaker 1: or if there's somebody being trained. No, I think maybe
Speaker 1: we should all just start doing cat videos, get huge
Speaker 1: on TikTok, and just forget the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: What do you think cat videos? What like I has cheeseburger,
Speaker 2: funny cat videos, things like that. It is a difficult
Speaker 2: time to be in the content space and to actually
Speaker 2: bring universal principles to the equation the intro that I
Speaker 2: just mentioned. What's your reaction to that?
Speaker 1: Well, I think what we're I mean, shoot, what makes
Speaker 1: me stay up at night thinking about the future of
Speaker 1: my daughter is you know, this whole thing, this concept
Speaker 1: of AI and talenteer which brings us software delivers the
Speaker 1: software that AI needs in order for it to make
Speaker 1: sense and organize the metadata, so one doesn't do much
Speaker 1: without the other.
Speaker 7: They're kind of like this.
Speaker 1: So of course it's I'm sure it's military intelligence more
Speaker 1: than it was you know, a corporation that just got
Speaker 1: a government contract. I'm pretty sure it was built to
Speaker 1: do that very thing.
Speaker 7: But I mean, we're up against a lot.
Speaker 1: We're up against the cult of society where media and
Speaker 1: education are going to have more of a impact because
Speaker 1: people are submersed in that reality, which is a false reality,
Speaker 1: and what little bits that we chip away I mean,
Speaker 1: we're not really talking about an awakening or conversion of thought.
Speaker 1: I think people have to already be curious or fed
Speaker 1: up a little, but not have maybe all of the
Speaker 1: pieces or a place to start. And I think the
Speaker 1: only thing that we can really provide is confirmation for
Speaker 1: them that things aren't right by having them hear something
Speaker 1: that makes sense and resonates with them. But as far
Speaker 1: as like converting or awakening somebody, I don't know if
Speaker 1: that's actually a real thing. I think I think what
Speaker 1: we do is we stir up those people who are
Speaker 1: already curious and understand that something's not right.
Speaker 2: Well, and that's a really good point. And one of
Speaker 2: the ways that I think we do this is we
Speaker 2: can we can easily point out now some of the
Speaker 2: contradictions or the hypocrisy. So let me just give an
Speaker 2: obvious example. So we have the Christian right in America,
Speaker 2: mostly Trump supporters. Many of the Christians are also strong
Speaker 2: supporters of Israel, especially those age let's say fifty five
Speaker 2: and older. And they say they're pro life, so they
Speaker 2: support protecting unborn babies, but right now they are supporting
Speaker 2: two things that are anti life. Supporting Israeli genocide in Gaza,
Speaker 2: and they're supporting Trump sweeping human sex trafficking and pedophilia
Speaker 2: mass raping of children under the rug. So that's just
Speaker 2: a glaring contradiction, right, If you support children, you can't
Speaker 2: support pedophiles and genocide obviously, but they do. How how
Speaker 2: do people hold those ideas or how should we think
Speaker 2: about this when we are not trapped in that cult.
Speaker 1: Well, first we should use your your software enoch Ai,
Speaker 1: to see if it can develop an image that looks
Speaker 1: like a bunny being held by its ears over a
Speaker 1: boiling pot of water with with with Epstein's face as
Speaker 1: the bunny, and it called it fatal distraction. Okay, because
Speaker 1: I think I think a lot of this. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just it's symptoms to the bigger disease, and that
Speaker 1: bigger disease is they're not caring anymore.
Speaker 7: That the veil is.
Speaker 1: They're not trying to get to the point of Yeah, obviously,
Speaker 1: people are holding two conflicting beliefs and it has to
Speaker 1: do with what they've been taught because of who's who's
Speaker 1: telling them, you know, the people who are in control
Speaker 1: of the media. The idea that Muslims took down the
Speaker 1: world trade centers, all this shiit since the eighties with
Speaker 1: oh my god, it's the Libyans Is even in Back
Speaker 1: to the Future, right, that's who he was allegedly building
Speaker 1: the bomb for. It's it's propaganda that's been infused in
Speaker 1: US for decades that these people over the Middle East
Speaker 1: are bad and they're they're picking on the poor Israelis
Speaker 1: who are nothing but terrorists and mass murderers and child harmers.
Speaker 1: But that's not what they see. So when somebody, you know,
Speaker 1: official tells them that they're all terrorists, they don't think
Speaker 1: too much deeper about it. It's already been. It's all
Speaker 1: that's doing is it's triggering that same memory and that
Speaker 1: that that programming, that's that's that uh that agrees with that,
Speaker 1: So there's nothing, there's no controversy in their minds. So
Speaker 1: as long as it's just those people, you know, they're
Speaker 1: not real people. They're lesser than they're lesser than people,
Speaker 1: so their children blah blah blah. As long as they
Speaker 1: don't have to see it and have to be faced
Speaker 1: with the horror and the atrocities of what this actually means,
Speaker 1: they can ignore it and keep on who rying because
Speaker 1: of their damn Bibles that you know, this is all
Speaker 1: part of God's work and all those other bullshit while
Speaker 1: children are being mass murdered over a bunch of lies.
Speaker 1: To be covertly in control of America, they don't care
Speaker 1: if you know who really runs it, and those same
Speaker 1: banking wars that we you know, the same banking cartel
Speaker 1: or the cult of Saturn, and if you want to
Speaker 1: call it that that is represented in Judaism or the
Speaker 1: telmutic Judaism, whatever you want to call it, Frankism Sesionism,
Speaker 1: which I think is basically Frankism with a different names.
Speaker 1: That's all going to be present in everything that they do,
Speaker 1: and I don't think they care anymore whether or not
Speaker 1: they cover up that fact. I think they make it
Speaker 1: very obvious because I think they're kind of like sliding
Speaker 1: into home plate right now, and that once they get
Speaker 1: across it, it won't matter what we think, because it
Speaker 1: would be so much surveillance slash repercussions for speaking out
Speaker 1: against them, that it's not going to matter what we
Speaker 1: think because we'll shut up anyway if we know it's
Speaker 1: good for us.
Speaker 2: So you're saying, I think what you're saying is that
Speaker 2: the whole volunteer infrastructure is going to be used to
Speaker 2: control and censor speech to make sure that people don't
Speaker 2: criticize Israel.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, let's look at it. What there's what's
Speaker 1: going on right now, and this is just what we
Speaker 1: know is going on right now. Creates killed lists of
Speaker 1: quote unquote enemies or targets or threats. They threat assess
Speaker 1: polunteers doing this and sending them lists. If they get
Speaker 1: a list of fifty, Israel goes and kills all these
Speaker 1: people and then asks for more. So this is an
Speaker 1: arbitrary selection that polunteers just giving them more targets. All
Speaker 1: these targets that we've been hearing about recently, and when
Speaker 1: we get into the instagrams, we'll see a lot of this,
Speaker 1: and I'll try to remember to reference this back. They've
Speaker 1: been families' homes, they've been families targeted with bombings with
Speaker 1: you know, sniper fire, burning their tents when they don't
Speaker 1: have a home. All these things are being directed toward
Speaker 1: people who are unarmed and their families. They're not even
Speaker 1: I don't even think they're even attempting to consider them
Speaker 1: hamas anymore. They're just all bad terrorist Gosins. These again
Speaker 1: are families, and this is what Pollenteer is doing to them.
Speaker 1: What's Palenteer going to do when they're all done over there,
Speaker 1: and when they're already building a surveillance system for Trump
Speaker 1: which really isn't for him. But you know, these are
Speaker 1: the talking heads that introduced these ideas to us. What
Speaker 1: do you think it's going to go next? This is
Speaker 1: the cheka on steroids, and a very technocratic one. Absolutely,
Speaker 1: And I mean, but when we're talking about what they're
Speaker 1: doing to the Palestinians, it's not even so much that
Speaker 1: they support what they're doing. It's a matter of not
Speaker 1: questioning what they do. And I think that's a different
Speaker 1: perspective or perception or angle to look at it at
Speaker 1: vantage point to look at it, because that sounds more
Speaker 1: cultish than just, you know, trying to make a good
Speaker 1: excuse as to why blowing up older and murdering families
Speaker 1: is a good thing unarmed people.
Speaker 7: It's more like if a.
Speaker 1: Certain group of people do that, then you're not even
Speaker 1: supposed to question it or think about it. If somebody
Speaker 1: else did it, they would make a big uproar because
Speaker 1: they're always about stoking the fires of minority, everything and
Speaker 1: anything and everything to divide people and make infighting. But
Speaker 1: when it comes to them, you're supposed to just fall
Speaker 1: into a coma and not even consider that what they're
Speaker 1: doing is wrong. To me, that's a cultish behavior to
Speaker 1: have that type of blind blind spot, deliberate blind spot
Speaker 1: where you're intentionally not thinking about it, you know, so well, yeah.
Speaker 2: And you say it's cultish behavior. And I have to
Speaker 2: concur with that because you you see many of these
Speaker 2: especially older Christians who grew up on the Schofield Bible
Speaker 2: and like Ted Kruz, and they have this this unwavering
Speaker 2: loyalty or let's say, the excuse anything that Israel does
Speaker 2: because they were taught that they have to obey Israel.
Speaker 1: I think that's what a politician's job is, right, is
Speaker 1: to make an explanation that the public will buy, and
Speaker 1: if they don't buy it, just repeated enough times until
Speaker 1: that's all they hear from a different bunch of different angles,
Speaker 1: until that's the only thing that it resonates in their
Speaker 1: head anymore. So it's the it's the it's them making
Speaker 1: kind of selling the ideas that they're going to do anyway.
Speaker 1: And I have to actually bring up this point since
Speaker 1: we're kind of, you know, like the mockingbird media type
Speaker 1: of scenario there, and even if it's a flimsy explanation,
Speaker 1: it works. And I think that that lens Uh, I
Speaker 1: guess it kind of puts under the microscope the comprehension
Speaker 1: level of some people or their or their preoccupation. You know,
Speaker 1: they don't have time to think about this stuff because
Speaker 1: they're rushing around to plug all the whole in their
Speaker 1: leaky vessel, trying to maintain financial security for themselves and
Speaker 1: their families in a system that's kind of falling and
Speaker 1: failing on them going that direction. Once the Bank of
Speaker 1: England kind of transferred power or home of operations over
Speaker 1: to Federal Reserve over here, using the might and wealth
Speaker 1: of America, sucking and sapping dry all the true wealth
Speaker 1: for itself and utilizing our military that they built up
Speaker 1: to fight their wars. One has to ask themselves after
Speaker 1: a while, you know, if we were always out therefore
Speaker 1: before we're doing wars for Israel specifically directly, and you
Speaker 1: can't unapologetically we were always talking about fighting communism, the
Speaker 1: spread of communism. Well, we didn't do a very good
Speaker 1: job with that either every place that we went into
Speaker 1: seems like there was a stalemate or nothing of major
Speaker 1: importance except for a bunch of people died, So we
Speaker 1: couldn't fight communism. We funded the Bullsheit Bvik revolution through
Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve. And you know that was Jacob shiff
Speaker 1: doing the money, the money handling and sending twenty million
Speaker 1: dollars of a US gold over to them to help
Speaker 1: fund their their murder rampage. So why do we think
Speaker 1: and we were you know, FDR was called, was calling
Speaker 1: Stalin uncle Joe, this mass murdering psychopath himself. At what
Speaker 1: point and let's not forget that he was pushing Japan
Speaker 1: to strike cutting off. I think it was oil to
Speaker 1: them for their effort, like all kinds of shit he
Speaker 1: was and then, knowing full well and in full advance,
Speaker 1: basically had the the planes pushed together closer so that
Speaker 1: there could be more devastation when the attack did occur,
Speaker 1: because more would be destroyed. Yeah. Yeah, So there's a
Speaker 1: lot of things going on in this whole thing. And
Speaker 1: if you are in all of his price fixing, he
Speaker 1: was a communistic leader. All the expansion of government like
Speaker 1: forty times at size, with all these different agencies and programs,
Speaker 1: the Raw Deal not the New Deal.
Speaker 7: Do we think that we changed nature.
Speaker 1: Did the Americans overthrow this and bring us back to
Speaker 1: the constitutional republics sometime in history that we didn't hear
Speaker 1: about or is it still the same thing.
Speaker 7: Just worse now?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's still the same thing, you know. Yeah, Okay,
Speaker 2: So then let's expand this beyond just the Middle East,
Speaker 2: because Trump has now given Putin.
Speaker 1: Apparently, I hope that was clear. My point is like
Speaker 1: when we're if we're going to start on a baseline
Speaker 1: and we're going to start saying, you know, the symptoms
Speaker 1: are that there's overwhelming support for a very evil thing
Speaker 1: that everybody should be will aware of because it's pretty
Speaker 1: obvious what's happening, and we have been fighting wards for
Speaker 1: them at their behest. Whenever they tell us that there's
Speaker 1: a threat or that's good threat that's going to threaten
Speaker 1: America two, or that you know, oh that was the
Speaker 1: Middle East, that you know some some some wacko Muslims
Speaker 1: that did this or did that. We we buy it
Speaker 1: because that's what the media tells us. But what is
Speaker 1: that more of a symptom of a system that's already
Speaker 1: been captured, you know, and it's it's already in the hands.
Speaker 1: There isn't a place in the system itself to fix
Speaker 1: the system, because it's all bad, the whole thing. It's
Speaker 1: not a constitutional republic that has been discarded a long
Speaker 1: time ago. You can't have all of these aspects of
Speaker 1: your civilization under their control and hope to have one
Speaker 1: guy or one group of people somehow exist in the
Speaker 1: capacity of doing good and bringing things back to order
Speaker 1: when there's there's a dependency issue on all those other
Speaker 1: parts which the evil still controls. And that evil, personified
Speaker 1: visually and right in front of your face, is what
Speaker 1: you see occurring in Israel. But that what you see
Speaker 1: there also controls us. So the other elements and the
Speaker 1: concerns and the let's debate about this, and let's what
Speaker 1: do you think about that? I don't really, it doesn't.
Speaker 1: It doesn't compete with me because I'm thinking to myself,
Speaker 1: what does any of that matter? Where basically in a
Speaker 1: panopticon prison of surveillance, all the speculation about what this
Speaker 1: is and what that is meaningless because what is that
Speaker 1: going to do until you solve that?
Speaker 7: What?
Speaker 1: Like the houses on fire, guys you know, let's not
Speaker 1: let's not worry about other stupid things until you figure
Speaker 1: out how figure out how to either escape that fire
Speaker 1: put it out.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 1: No, by the way, if you try to do that,
Speaker 1: you get shot. I mean, this is this is where
Speaker 1: we're at. We're at a real we at realization point,
Speaker 1: and we have to come to that realization that we
Speaker 1: are very much enslaved and that the most evil, wicked
Speaker 1: pedophiles in the world operate every aspect of our life
Speaker 1: and they create our perception of reality. So if we
Speaker 1: don't recognize that, we're still operating under a delusion of
Speaker 1: what's real, and so everything that we every detail, everything
Speaker 1: that we conceptualize in that illusion is meaningless because it's
Speaker 1: still part of the dream. You know, we're we're trying
Speaker 1: to trying to remember or trying to when I say,
Speaker 1: because the memory of a dream, and we're trying to
Speaker 1: articulate something that you know, it defies reason. Why would
Speaker 1: people be okay with child harm? And why would any
Speaker 1: of this? Why why are people so trusting of this
Speaker 1: system that has shown itself for what it is time
Speaker 1: it again and now without even trying to mask itself.
Speaker 1: Where where are we and why are people not all
Speaker 1: repulsed and in an uproar. That's the terrifying part because
Speaker 1: everything that's that I perceive happening next and that they've
Speaker 1: told us are going to is going to happen. But
Speaker 1: people don't understand what the ramifications of that is. There's
Speaker 1: no there's no resistance to it. There can't be. There
Speaker 1: can't be right now because of how much of every
Speaker 1: aspect of that system they control. You can't get justice
Speaker 1: because the justice system and a bunch of freaking you know,
Speaker 1: psychopaths as well, and they have something to protect, they
Speaker 1: have skin in the game, and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: So where are we going to go with this? I
Speaker 1: don't think bricks is going to save anything. I don't
Speaker 1: think any type of trump A plan to stop this
Speaker 1: or shut down that is going to do anything. Because
Speaker 1: very know whose masters are. He wouldn't be where he
Speaker 1: is if he wasn't. Because this is not what people
Speaker 1: think it is. America isn't what they think it is.
Speaker 1: Israel is a mirror. It's a mirror, but people don't
Speaker 1: recognize their own reflection.
Speaker 2: Fifty day deadline, you know, Putin's like saying or what
Speaker 2: you know, what are you going to do? Sanction us
Speaker 2: another ten times on top of the twenty five thousand
Speaker 2: existing sanctions. You know who cares. But there seems to
Speaker 2: be this delusion among Western leaders. This is true in
Speaker 2: the UK, the US, France, Germany, et cetera. This delusion.
Speaker 2: I mean, they're still living in the nineteen eighties and
Speaker 2: nineteen nineties. They think that the US can just dominate everything,
Speaker 2: and even the interactions with Israel, they think that the US.
Speaker 1: But here's again this idea that America acts independently. So
Speaker 1: whatever it's going to do or thinks it's going to do,
Speaker 1: or whatever the leaders think they're going to do or whatever,
Speaker 1: or however they fail. None of this is a failure
Speaker 1: of that system. Because there's a plan demolition going on here.
Speaker 1: There's going to be a shifting of power, and it
Speaker 1: doesn't I don't know if we'll ever. They're never going
Speaker 1: to shoot straight with us and tell us anything. When
Speaker 1: they say from over to from covert to over control, well,
Speaker 1: some of people will recognize that, others will not. You know,
Speaker 1: the fact that they bring in all these people who
Speaker 1: have to be of the same quote unquote tribe should
Speaker 1: be telling to certain people who can recognize that as
Speaker 1: a pattern and how this usually is the beginning of
Speaker 1: the end for most civilizations societies. But people don't recognize.
Speaker 2: That US can just bomb you.
Speaker 1: And whether or not we are failing, or the dollar's failing,
Speaker 1: or if we're not going to be able to dominate anymore, well,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter if we as this idea of our
Speaker 1: identity as quote unquote an American, which again that's the
Speaker 1: mistake right there, we are our government. Our government isn't
Speaker 1: a government, it's a collection of banking cult people, right,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't affect them, so there's no losing winning here.
Speaker 1: We're well, this is like a spectator watch, you know,
Speaker 1: watching something getting too involved in the TV show. There's
Speaker 1: nothing for us that we can do that will influence that,
Speaker 1: that will alter it, because it's already been, it's already done.
Speaker 1: And if we have what we see or perceive as oh,
Speaker 1: the America can't go bullying around, well that's okay, because
Speaker 1: whatever is going to win they control as well. Where
Speaker 1: do we come off with this like childish idea that
Speaker 1: they somehow have to preserve America. They've been sucking our
Speaker 1: wealth out, siphoning it out they've been using our military
Speaker 1: mighty to take down their enemies. Once those are gone,
Speaker 1: we're the only one that's left. And then we go.
Speaker 1: And if we see a weakening here, that's because that's
Speaker 1: that's intentional. And they don't care if some other country
Speaker 1: which they also control, can harm us, it doesn't affect
Speaker 1: that our power. We have to we have to operate
Speaker 1: under what who controls us? And how it is going?
Speaker 1: How does it affect them? Not whether or not America
Speaker 1: is this or America is it's not. It's not a thing.
Speaker 1: It's them. And then you have to ask yourself, how
Speaker 1: many other countries do they control? Do they control all
Speaker 1: their finances, do they control their militaries? Do they control
Speaker 1: the mineral rights? So from all those countries from which
Speaker 1: this banking cartel controls, what does it matter where the
Speaker 1: where the centralized power lies? What does it matter? Geographically?
Speaker 1: It's a fire sale one place, it's a building somewhere else,
Speaker 1: you know, build up of somewhere else. America had its time,
Speaker 1: and if we don't do something about it, what are
Speaker 1: we going to do? Well? People aren't even paying attention.
Speaker 1: So I don't know the answer to that.
Speaker 2: Ron into submission Yeah.
Speaker 7: But is it our job?
Speaker 1: Is it really us that gets to decide? Like who
Speaker 1: made us arbiter of all truth in all things that
Speaker 1: we can go around telling other countries what they can
Speaker 1: and cannot own, but what they can work on.
Speaker 7: Who told us? Who gave us that permission?
Speaker 1: Because we're we decided that we're the holiest of holies,
Speaker 1: Like when the hell did that happen? Well? Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: but you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: Post World War two, American exceptionalism became a kind of
Speaker 2: self reinforcing.
Speaker 1: Post World War two, American anything was an American It
Speaker 1: wasn't since eighteen sixty five. What we did is we
Speaker 1: paved the way for the people who can truly control
Speaker 1: us to have more dominating control anybody who would have
Speaker 1: been old Old America's allies. They've sent us out to
Speaker 1: kill in the world where our founding father's idealism was
Speaker 1: first and foremost at the top of the chain, there
Speaker 1: would have been a whole different relationship between quote unquote
Speaker 1: fascists and national socialists, a whole different relationship between Libya
Speaker 1: and US, probably a whole different relationship between Iran and
Speaker 1: Iraq and US. But it's this antagonizer this parasite, the
Speaker 1: thing that which controls us, that has us doing things
Speaker 1: against our best interest or at least the best interests
Speaker 1: of the people. Liberators are being destroyed, dominators, direct tyrants
Speaker 1: are being lifted, and two wars that that that concreted
Speaker 1: the Judaic banking cult in place over dominance of the
Speaker 1: entire world. And then it would just a matter of
Speaker 1: going around and taking out individual states with their own
Speaker 1: their own financial system to finally take everything over.
Speaker 2: Right, But that's that's beginning to fail now. For example,
Speaker 2: the economic sanctions against Russia did not bring down Russia.
Speaker 2: The dollar is collapsing right now in value.
Speaker 1: That's the part that I don't seem to care about.
Speaker 1: I guess the dollar is collapsing. Yeah, how many times
Speaker 1: have they devalued something like what they did to Berlin,
Speaker 1: Look what they did to Germany. So you just said
Speaker 1: it that, Mike just said it himself. That's our future.
Speaker 1: And if you want to look back at the Napoleonic
Speaker 1: Wars and the false information that was given, Napoleon won,
Speaker 1: everybody's stocks dropped and then ross Childs went in and
Speaker 1: bought everything on for pennies on a dollar. No one
Speaker 1: fucking all of Europe basically, So who's to say that's
Speaker 1: not going to happen here with whatever's left that Blackrock
Speaker 1: doesn't already own, and then everything will stabilize again because
Speaker 1: then they'll increase their wealth and their control and their
Speaker 1: dominance on everything. If you see the pattern and the strategy,
Speaker 1: Worrying about the dollar doesn't make any bit of difference.
Speaker 1: It's about where it's all going. What is that a
Speaker 1: symptom of? What is that an indicator of? These are
Speaker 1: the It's not about the actual thing, it's about what
Speaker 1: it indicates, what's coming next? Because you all, all we
Speaker 1: can do right now is follow it along. Because with
Speaker 1: me talking about it and everybody, you know, the few
Speaker 1: people that get it, what are we going to be
Speaker 1: able to do about it? You know what I mean?
Speaker 1: What are we gonna do? How are we going to
Speaker 1: change it? What's going to happen? The movers and shakers
Speaker 1: and the lever polders and button pushers are far out
Speaker 1: of our reach. We're not any of those people. But
Speaker 1: the room does it sound? Does it sound depressing? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah it does. I've been interrupt for a long time,
Speaker 1: that vacation or that that visit that I had with
Speaker 1: my parents. You know, it took me a lot on
Speaker 1: time to decompress a long time, and I had opposition
Speaker 1: and irritation from you know, dealing with family who I
Speaker 1: love that didn't quite get me. And it was fine.
Speaker 1: But as soon as I got back and I saw
Speaker 1: that the house was in beautiful order and I had
Speaker 1: just spent all that time with my daughter, that's what
Speaker 1: mattered for me, and that's what helped me become for
Speaker 1: a little while, feeling normal and better. And I don't
Speaker 1: want to lose that feeling anymore. I don't. It's it's
Speaker 1: because I just realized that I was in a rout
Speaker 1: of despair and it came through and everything at my
Speaker 1: my attitude on videos, my my my attitude and everything,
Speaker 1: because it was like, what the hell is a fucking point?
Speaker 1: And it's basically, I'm like, okay, so I know what
Speaker 1: my role is. My role is to protect my little
Speaker 1: one and then die doing so, and that's all that's
Speaker 1: gonna that's that's that's that's the end game. So you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of this shit I just don't care about anymore.
Speaker 1: I want to just fucking leave it all behind because
Speaker 1: I've done as much as I possibly can shooting my
Speaker 1: mouth off on videos already, you know, and it doesn't
Speaker 1: it doesn't benefit me in any way at all. I
Speaker 1: could be doing other things creatively that I enjoy, using
Speaker 1: the same computers and the same the same microphone and
Speaker 1: the same set up here, and do something that would
Speaker 1: be probably just But I don't know. I was going
Speaker 1: to say a distraction, But so what am I doing
Speaker 1: now is it's not a distraction. So I'm Mike has
Speaker 1: me right now while I'm having an existential crisis and
Speaker 1: I'm trying to answer his questions, like I'm saying, when
Speaker 1: I'm when this video occurred when I finally got home,
Speaker 1: that's the only time was actually clicked that I was
Speaker 1: already that I was even in and rut because I
Speaker 1: just and it wasn't because I had to be like
Speaker 1: Sulker or reflect on it. No, it's just because I
Speaker 1: know how I knew the difference. When I started feeling
Speaker 1: better BACKA and I have been getting along much better now.
Speaker 1: I'm not constantly in a negative well yeah, negative upset
Speaker 1: right rightfully so rightfully, rightfully frustrated and discouraged, but that
Speaker 1: energy leveling being low, that low vibration only attracts more
Speaker 1: negative things. You know, I honestly feel that, and I
Speaker 1: honestly believe this because I've seen this so many times
Speaker 1: in the last twelve years of my business, that whenever
Speaker 1: I make a decision and I go forward, things fall
Speaker 1: in place. Like making a decision is the biggest part
Speaker 1: of the whole thing. You're like, if you want to
Speaker 1: do a billion things and you can't decide what you
Speaker 1: want to do, you don't get much of either of them,
Speaker 1: of any of them because if you and that's cool
Speaker 1: to have lots of interest, but you have to pick
Speaker 1: one thing and like see it to its end or
Speaker 1: build it to a certain level, and then take on
Speaker 1: something else. Sometimes, at least for me, I understand that's
Speaker 1: how it works. So when I when I when I
Speaker 1: make that choice, it seems like things get out of
Speaker 1: my way to help me get it. Also, when I'm
Speaker 1: in a positive state of or mood, for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: the business does better. I don't understand how that is,
Speaker 1: but it's so strange that it's true, right, I can't.
Speaker 1: I can't explain it, but internet orders would just come
Speaker 1: flying in. It's just the way things operate. It's it.
Speaker 1: I don't know if if if there really is like
Speaker 1: an attraction like aspect of allness or not. I don't know,
Speaker 1: but I think when you're on the right path, I
Speaker 1: think the matrix or the or the the creator or
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it, the ether, the the
Speaker 1: self aware ether that touches all things it recognizes and want,
Speaker 1: and it's trying to communicate with you. And when you
Speaker 1: recognize it back, I think it. I think it does
Speaker 1: things to help benefit you. And when you realize you
Speaker 1: can lighten up a little bit and take it as
Speaker 1: the game that it is, I think you get to
Speaker 1: succeed more in that game. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I
Speaker 1: sound like a lunatic. I don't know. But things have
Speaker 1: been nothing but great since everything came and I got back,
Speaker 1: and I was I was in arguments with my mom
Speaker 1: all the way up to the end of the trip,
Speaker 1: and I was just, you know, discouraged by a lot
Speaker 1: of things. But I I was away from so many
Speaker 1: things for eighteen days, right, and I came back. The
Speaker 1: house is beautiful, there's no more clutter, the function, the
Speaker 1: feng Shwei isn't all thinged up, and that that did
Speaker 1: amazing things for me, just that alone, the chaos was
Speaker 1: gone and was symbolic in a sense that the chaos
Speaker 1: was at least alleviated. So going back into these dark
Speaker 1: pasts or even watching me talking right now, I'm not
Speaker 1: happy with my performance here. I don't like what I've said,
Speaker 1: as people have seld me. Look, it was fine, it
Speaker 1: was great, and all that stuff, but that's not what
Speaker 1: I see. I see me not being to answer questions
Speaker 1: because I don't. It's like I'm already detached from it.
Speaker 1: Not even so much of that, but it's like, whateff
Speaker 1: am I supposed to put into knowing all these things
Speaker 1: when none of it to me makes a difference. You know,
Speaker 1: I can look at a specific thing, like when we're
Speaker 1: doing the I can comment on things as they're happening
Speaker 1: situational style. I'm good at that, reading something and reacting
Speaker 1: to that, watching something, reacting to that, being in a
Speaker 1: situational type of like drama, whatever comedy I can. I
Speaker 1: could relate and play my role in that. When you're
Speaker 1: asking me things that I find to be not real
Speaker 1: or of real substance or of real matter. That's what
Speaker 1: my aspergers kicks in, and it doesn't make any sense
Speaker 1: to me. And I don't even know know, I don't
Speaker 1: even want to touch it. It's like, these concepts are
Speaker 1: faults in the first place, So why would I have
Speaker 1: an opinion on these faults concepts? Do you understand what
Speaker 1: I mean? I don't know. Hold on one second. I
Speaker 1: want to see if anybody's told me that I'm a
Speaker 1: fucking idiot or not. I feel like I am so
Speaker 1: if I dont society failed the final litmus test that
Speaker 1: people have failed. Yep. That was the moment of the
Speaker 1: first big transfer of power, the napoleonical ward rothschild deception.
Speaker 1: What's up for yours act? Plan? Your act? Act? Your plan?
Speaker 1: It goes smoothly. I like it, bread and then Radio
Speaker 1: sac said that was clear. Okay, hold on it jumped.
Speaker 1: That was a really good story, bro, wholesome as fuck.
Speaker 1: Glad to hear you got to clear your head and
Speaker 1: gain that new perspective. I went to or something to
Speaker 1: what you mean, bro, I have asked, But yeah, and
Speaker 1: I think that makes us normal. Honestly, I think having
Speaker 1: that aspect to us of like not having a any
Speaker 1: skin in the game of artificial constructs that people make
Speaker 1: that aren't real, That that self delude or that have
Speaker 1: been taught to them so that they could be deluded.
Speaker 1: I think that's a good thing. I think that's an advantage,
Speaker 1: But not when everybody else is still following the same fiction.
Speaker 1: Right when you're outside of the fiction and you're asked
Speaker 1: to comment on the fiction, it's like, what do you mean?
Speaker 1: Real is my daughter and my and my relationship. Real
Speaker 1: is you know, my interactions with people and trying to
Speaker 1: do my best to be good to and play my
Speaker 1: role as a good person in the world. Worrying about
Speaker 1: this or that when there's out of my control. I mean,
Speaker 1: I love talking about history to inform people of how
Speaker 1: we're getting screwed or because that just happens to be
Speaker 1: what our history is, not because that's what I wanted
Speaker 1: it to be. I would love to tell, you know,
Speaker 1: the story of all the wonderful things that have happened
Speaker 1: in history that have benefited mankind, you know, And I
Speaker 1: think there is a lot of that in the British HEADA.
Speaker 1: What the British DA also does is it tells you,
Speaker 1: it shows you an alternative to the lie that has
Speaker 1: put everybody in this mind trap ever since, and it says, hey,
Speaker 1: you're not shit. It's not all semitic because these people
Speaker 1: are not good role models for moral living. So for
Speaker 1: us to think that that's the epitome of man and
Speaker 1: that this is the human condition, that's all bullshit. It's
Speaker 1: their condition. We are the good people. We have just
Speaker 1: been taught that we're not. We've not even so much
Speaker 1: had our you know, we haven't surrendered our power. We
Speaker 1: had it sucked out of our fucking soul. We had
Speaker 1: it sucked out of our fucking backs of our necks
Speaker 1: like a fucking giant mosquito. You know, that's what's happened.
Speaker 1: It's all been bullshit. So I don't want to continue
Speaker 1: walking into their shit that they have us to distract
Speaker 1: us with. I want to stand outside of that, discard it,
Speaker 1: and not put any of my energy into it to
Speaker 1: help prop it up anymore. I want to stay away
Speaker 1: from it all the way and just talk about, Hey,
Speaker 1: this stuff here, like I'm talking about the British Shadow
Speaker 1: or something like that. This is how they've rearranged our
Speaker 1: belief in ourselves and made us antagonists against our very
Speaker 1: nature and our ancestors. But hey, look, we can change
Speaker 1: that when we feel like it, When people will just
Speaker 1: hold too tightly on the No, it has to be
Speaker 1: this religious belief of ours. It can't be. But I'm like,
Speaker 1: but this came before that, and these are your people,
Speaker 1: and they were good people. They were protectors and guardians.
Speaker 1: They were everything that we're supposed to be. They're everything
Speaker 1: that we're supposed to be. That's why this matters. And
Speaker 1: if you don't accept that, you don't and you want
Speaker 1: to give up your power to these fucking people, then
Speaker 1: you've already decided that it's okay for them to murder
Speaker 1: your family, it's okay for them to destroy the world,
Speaker 1: it's okay for them to destroy the environment all the wild,
Speaker 1: punishing you for their actions. Because this is the sick,
Speaker 1: freaking psychosis of this type of magic and sorcery. I'm
Speaker 1: done with it. I'm done with it. I want to
Speaker 1: do happy things. I'm gonna do positive things. I think
Speaker 1: talking about the British Edita is positive, you know, I
Speaker 1: think talking about history to least. You know, hey, if
Speaker 1: if when I started this channel, I was talking about
Speaker 1: the I should just put this over here first and
Speaker 1: all one wrong.
Speaker 4: One.
Speaker 1: I was talking about medical truth, and that's how I
Speaker 1: got blacklisted. Everywhere on the planet. We had nothing to
Speaker 1: do with talking about the Jays. That all came later,
Speaker 1: And that's because I didn't have a better word for Saturn,
Speaker 1: colt Enonites, freaking baking, whatever you want to call them. This,
Speaker 1: this evil that has been around long before they called
Speaker 1: it started calling themselves Jews, and long before they started
Speaker 1: calling themselves Jesuits, and long before they started calling themselves
Speaker 1: a church that was built in defiance to whatever Jesus was,
Speaker 1: if it was a story or a person, I'm not
Speaker 1: getting involved in that. To me, all this stuff is
Speaker 1: superfluous because they've always deified real people always. That's why
Speaker 1: we have gods of this and the gods of that,
Speaker 1: and it talks to you, it tells you all about
Speaker 1: this in the Eda, and that just like blows away
Speaker 1: any of this religious dogwood that's ever come after it.
Speaker 1: They didn't deify themselves, they didn't ask to be deified.
Speaker 1: That's just what happened because they were such good people,
Speaker 1: you know. And then that becomes corrupted and they change
Speaker 1: the the details and attributes of these people to fit
Speaker 1: their mold, and then they give you a different Zeus
Speaker 1: who's an asshole, right, and that's what happened with the
Speaker 1: Greek mythology. Zeus became a douchebag, tyrant scum who rapes Europa.
Speaker 1: So it's I don't know, I don't know, but again,
Speaker 1: and let's get back to this. All I'm saying is
Speaker 1: it's hard for me to engage in that which is
Speaker 1: not real, the artificial, because it's it's like, I have
Speaker 1: a good creative imagination. I like to play story time,
Speaker 1: make believe stuff, you know, like it, but not when
Speaker 1: it's detrimental to doing anything that's important. And I don't
Speaker 1: think finding the right answer or the right collection or
Speaker 1: combination or arrangement of words to make people get excited
Speaker 1: because it's something that they wanted to hear anyway, So
Speaker 1: all you're doing is reconfirming what it is that they
Speaker 1: wanted you to say or believe any or what they
Speaker 1: believe in any way. I don't think that's my role,
Speaker 1: you know, if I if that's what all these you know,
Speaker 1: alternative media places are or these channels, I think a
Speaker 1: lot of it is that they just tell you what
Speaker 1: they tell you exactly what you're to anticipate. They reinforce,
Speaker 1: they reinforce that which does the public wants to hear,
Speaker 1: not what the truth is. The truth is much more bleak. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: it doesn't have to be that way, but that happens
Speaker 1: to be in our situation now because we're not doing
Speaker 1: our job, we're not doing our work, we're not putting
Speaker 1: it in the effort in because we're wrapped up in distractions.
Speaker 1: And then it's nothing to do with well, maybe sometimes
Speaker 1: it does have to do with TV, and you know
Speaker 1: that type of distraction. It's not the sitcom, but it
Speaker 1: is the poison of the message and all that stuff,
Speaker 1: that poisonous message that basically tells you that you're in
Speaker 1: you're behind the times. If you're not getting hip with
Speaker 1: this progressionsm you're not and you're just completely garbage. And
Speaker 1: there's going to be repercussions, threatened repercussions by your government.
Speaker 1: And that guy allegedly stands for constitutional you know, all
Speaker 1: the good things that America stands for, and if he
Speaker 1: doesn't like you talking bad about Israel or the Jews
Speaker 1: or Scionism. That's sick that they even say the word
Speaker 1: Zionism is anti Semitism. That's total bullshit, total bullshit, total
Speaker 1: evil bullshit. The moment that was said, you should have
Speaker 1: everybody should have known that the fix was in Zionism
Speaker 1: came out of the most darkest place of the Kabbala
Speaker 1: and Frankism so to say too. And if you ever
Speaker 1: watched the World Zionist Council, you ever saw any part
Speaker 1: of the Europa series, that's who Trump is defending the
Speaker 1: actions and the and the threats of the very people
Speaker 1: who were spouting off so arrogantly. And they were doing
Speaker 1: that how long ago. So if that was happening that
Speaker 1: long ago they felt that confident in their power, then
Speaker 1: their powers only increased since then. And of course they're
Speaker 1: not going to be it's not going to be easily
Speaker 1: recognized by people who find, you know, this whole concept
Speaker 1: of what they do foreign. No, it's going to be
Speaker 1: presented to us by people that are posing as our
Speaker 1: leaders but still delivering the same destructive agenda. And just
Speaker 1: because somebody is built up like a culti personality to
Speaker 1: be a certain thing, anyone else who said or did
Speaker 1: with these things that are in con direct contradiction to
Speaker 1: it would be seen for what they are. But people
Speaker 1: can't see. It's like it's the wolf of sheep clothing,
Speaker 1: you know, as long as the garment looks looks the right,
Speaker 1: they must be right. As long as the police officers
Speaker 1: wearing a badge in the uniform, he must be trustworthy authority.
Speaker 1: As long as the doctor's wearing the white coat, he
Speaker 1: must be a trustworthy authority. Is who am I to argue?
Speaker 1: With the science? It's the same repetitive thing over and
Speaker 1: over again. Leave your children with the church. I mean,
Speaker 1: those are holy people, and then they get raped. This
Speaker 1: goes on and on and on and on and on,
Speaker 1: but it never nobody ever fucking gets it. They make
Speaker 1: the same mistakes over and over again.
Speaker 2: Well is strong and Russia's industrial output is outpacing all
Speaker 2: of NATO combined in terms of military weapons. Doesn't look
Speaker 2: like India is going to go along with the US
Speaker 2: on that the brigstation.
Speaker 7: Happened in India. Anyway.
Speaker 1: The memory hold that happens with the media is so
Speaker 1: crazy because India shut off the water for Pakistan and
Speaker 1: we hear nothing because now we're onto.
Speaker 7: The next thing, right, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: It's just that the news cycle goes so quickly that
Speaker 1: major things that are catastrophic that we talk about nuclear
Speaker 1: potential is happening and This is what I'm saying is
Speaker 1: again like part of the ruse or the the artificial
Speaker 1: world that we live in, where everything is you know,
Speaker 1: catastrophic and immin it all the time. Everything that we
Speaker 1: hear about is potential game changing and life changing or
Speaker 1: life ending. And yet once they're done with that story,
Speaker 1: it's onto the next thing, a different distraction to keep
Speaker 1: your head spinning, like a fucking like a top. All
Speaker 1: of a sudden, they just get washed away into the
Speaker 1: next scary thing that's even more devastating, and then that
Speaker 1: goes away in a week, like we don't.
Speaker 7: Know where do we catch up? Where's the people reporting
Speaker 7: on any of this?
Speaker 2: I hear you, But my point is that it seems
Speaker 2: like the US, even though it's been acting this way
Speaker 2: since World War Two, it's not running into a brick
Speaker 2: wall or a bricks wall in this case where the
Speaker 2: brick stations are saying we're you know, we're done, We're
Speaker 2: just not. I mean, the dollar is no longer the
Speaker 2: majority reserve currency in the world. It's less than fifty
Speaker 2: percent of reserves.
Speaker 1: I think angles and like gambling and knowing when the
Speaker 1: fix is in, I don't think there's a way that
Speaker 1: these people could lose, whether they appear to be losing
Speaker 1: or not. If the dollar gets devalued, all the more
Speaker 1: reason for digital currency if they, you know, they can
Speaker 1: buy low like they always do, suck up all the
Speaker 1: true wealth and then restabilize with something else. So how
Speaker 1: much more low in value does our dollar have to be?
Speaker 1: When dolls made you a rich man one time, when
Speaker 1: a car used to cost eight hundred to twelve hundred dollars,
Speaker 1: when a house was attainable for what was it twenty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars? I mean, how much more? Did you ever?
Speaker 1: Did we ever see that the Russo video? We watched
Speaker 1: that Russo video where they're saying this one hundred dollars
Speaker 1: bill now represents like three sets. I mean, that's that's
Speaker 1: where we're at. Like, how much more devalued does does
Speaker 1: this hyperinflation have to get? It's going to get. It's
Speaker 1: going to get like you know, the people pushing around
Speaker 1: wheelbarrow was full of Deutsche marks to get a loaf
Speaker 1: of bread. That's gonna happen. It happened in freaking Zimbabwe.
Speaker 1: Before thinking back in two thousand and five six something
Speaker 1: like that. I mean, it's it's going to get that way.
Speaker 1: But I mean how it I don't know. I don't know. Man,
Speaker 1: worrying about the last three cents of that one hundred
Speaker 1: dollars bill. I think it's kind of silly. No, the
Speaker 1: bricks is kicking its head. Well yeah, Well, whenever a
Speaker 1: system is created that's not supposed to self destruct them
Speaker 1: or be hedged against everyone but a select few, you're
Speaker 1: going to see You're going to see more prosperity. Because
Speaker 1: prosperity was the goal. Prosperity was never the goal of
Speaker 1: this monetary system. It fractionated in a sign, fractuating more.
Speaker 1: It's zero. There's no reserves. They don't have to they
Speaker 1: don't who's going to hold them accountable. If they don't
Speaker 1: have any collateral, if they don't have any any any
Speaker 1: foundational money to lend, who's going to come down to them.
Speaker 1: They own everything. They're printing paper and making the world
Speaker 1: go around on paper. This is the biggest fucking magic
Speaker 1: spell there is. But again, because people believe in that fortune,
Speaker 1: they give it value because it's an assumed value. And
Speaker 1: again this is part of that artificial world. Gold is
Speaker 1: actually not any different. Gold is just a shiny piece
Speaker 1: of metal. You know. So what is value, value is
Speaker 1: effort labor. I think that. I think the Germany had
Speaker 1: had to write a Marx worth I worked for remark right,
Speaker 1: that's what they said, That's what he said. So what's
Speaker 1: the true true value of anything is your time and
Speaker 1: your energy. Human energy is the is the true economic
Speaker 1: And this is what they even said in the Silent
Speaker 1: Weapons for a Quiet War, is that economy is like
Speaker 1: a New World Order term. It's code for human energy.
Speaker 1: It's a measure of that. And when you have Trump
Speaker 1: tweeting in his first in his first term about the
Speaker 1: greatest economy, greatest economy, what are you saying more control
Speaker 1: over the people than people's energy and their minds. But
Speaker 1: in a and in a system where they care about
Speaker 1: the people, money would never be the obstacle because it's
Speaker 1: a it's a fake, it's a fake limitation on your
Speaker 1: ability to do things. Why wouldn't everybody work together to
Speaker 1: build a great society together this No, I need this money,
Speaker 1: I need that money to do That's that's where the
Speaker 1: evil little merchant fucker comes in. Who's who the fly
Speaker 1: by night or the one who disappears in the mist
Speaker 1: and the in the shadows after they make their their sale.
Speaker 1: That's what we're trying to That's what we're trying to
Speaker 1: preserve by talking about the dollar. I don't get it.
Speaker 1: A better system could have come about with nothing to
Speaker 1: replace it, to be honest, you know, they also own
Speaker 1: basically all the gold through theft, so so you know,
Speaker 1: and getting people with with with the false counterfeit system
Speaker 1: and then taking the true wealth.
Speaker 7: So that would be the minerals.
Speaker 1: And let's just look at some of the people who
Speaker 1: do have a shit ton of money. What is their value?
Speaker 1: What do what value do they bring to society? Who
Speaker 1: let's just look at influencers on the internet who talk
Speaker 1: about absolutely nothing, who make people more stupid for having
Speaker 1: listened to them, and who are destroying and turning into
Speaker 1: absolute sludge your children's minds with absolute zero substance in
Speaker 1: what they're doing, you know, And what there It's just
Speaker 1: a bunch of stupid like catchphrases and flashy colors and
Speaker 1: high editing and production value and dumb, stupid scenarios that
Speaker 1: are obviously scripted and stupid and poorly acted. And these
Speaker 1: people have the biggest houses in fucking La anywhere else
Speaker 1: you gotta go. These people bring no value. And this
Speaker 1: is how you know how artificial this freaking system is,
Speaker 1: because if it was based on merit, if it was
Speaker 1: based on your actual worth as a person and what
Speaker 1: you contribute, they would be poor as fuck. It's only
Speaker 1: in an artificial system that's designed to be destructive to
Speaker 1: the soul and the ambitions of man would this be possible.
Speaker 1: And that a country can't pay back its debt after
Speaker 1: they've caused the war in their country and decided to
Speaker 1: give them an i AM flow, and same people that
Speaker 1: caused the war now funding the rebuilding of the reconstruction.
Speaker 1: Whether they do they say, okay, we want mineral rights,
Speaker 1: we want oil rights, blah blah blah, and then they
Speaker 1: move in their corporations to sap that country dry of
Speaker 1: all of its natural resource, versus places like Libya where
Speaker 1: they say, no, we're going to nationalize this.
Speaker 7: Those people didn't.
Speaker 1: Have nationalizing the oil, and they basically profit shared with
Speaker 1: their people. Have an electric bill, they had free college,
Speaker 1: they didn't have taxes. Why because the government wasn't feeding
Speaker 1: off them like a parasite. The government was profit sharing
Speaker 1: with them based off of the national minerals in the
Speaker 1: national industry, that they were in business doing so. The
Speaker 1: people benefited from that, because when a leader actually cares
Speaker 1: about their people, you see the real difference happening. You
Speaker 1: saw it in Germany, sorry people, you did you see
Speaker 1: it in Libya? You saw it in Libya and then
Speaker 1: they did completely annihilate these places and put them back
Speaker 1: to beyond stone age.
Speaker 7: And it's a horror show to live there now.
Speaker 2: But I absolutely hear you. But the point I'm trying
Speaker 2: to get out here is that the ability of the
Speaker 2: US to create currency, whether it's digital or otherwise, without
Speaker 2: causing massive hyperinflation, has traditionally depended on the global demand
Speaker 2: for dollars as the trade settlement currency, especially with oil trades,
Speaker 2: Saudi Arabia, you know Iraq before.
Speaker 1: What do you think the what do you think the
Speaker 1: alternative is to US now? Or do you think they
Speaker 1: don't control something in those lines as well? I mean,
Speaker 1: what if it's bitcoin, do you think that's clean? Do
Speaker 1: you think any of those other digital currencies are clean?
Speaker 1: They have the control over that too.
Speaker 2: I don't think No, I don't think they're all clean.
Speaker 2: I think I think bitcoin is a CIA money transfer infrastructure.
Speaker 2: But at least bitcoin can't be as easily counterfeited as dollars.
Speaker 2: But here's here's what I'm trying to say, is that
Speaker 2: the ability.
Speaker 1: Of counterfeit is about making fake money. That is that's
Speaker 1: already fake. Or is he talking about the fact that
Speaker 1: money itself is faked? Uh printed on demand? Anyway, who's
Speaker 1: gonna who's gonna prevent that from hyper inflating if they
Speaker 1: if they can just print that will, that's how it
Speaker 1: happens in the first place. So knowing that that's true,
Speaker 1: we should have zero faith in the dollar because of
Speaker 1: who controls it. So there in lies the answer, out
Speaker 1: of that system and out of their out of their control,
Speaker 1: is to abandon that because if they have the power
Speaker 1: to at any time just print more of it, we
Speaker 1: should stop accepting it. We should stop trading in it,
Speaker 1: our trading in it, and our paying of bills and
Speaker 1: paying of our taxes. It's like a reconfirmation, a content,
Speaker 1: a consistent and continuous re pledging to be a slave
Speaker 1: in their system and to be part of their public ritual.
Speaker 1: It's our continuous acceptance to submit to their will and
Speaker 1: to obey their cult.
Speaker 2: The US to keep printing trillions of dollars without causing
Speaker 2: hyper inflation is coming to an end. So in essence
Speaker 2: we're going to end up in a hyperinflationary.
Speaker 1: So the bitcoin, which is even more vaporous, more intangible, intangible,
Speaker 1: so we're talking about numbers on it. People would always
Speaker 1: criticize your banks, your bank statement and you know, swiping
Speaker 1: cars and stuff like that as being just numbers on
Speaker 1: a screen. Well, so we're just numbers in a Ledger
Speaker 1: book before that, and so it just numbers on a computer,
Speaker 1: be if it was a fucking digital currency. The whole
Speaker 1: idea is like, it's still the wrong it's still the
Speaker 1: wrong way to conceptualize the problem or the or this
Speaker 1: idea of wealth. In the first place, wealth came from
Speaker 1: ability for to be a leader or it'd be a
Speaker 1: contributor to your your community or tribe. That's that's what
Speaker 1: put place value on you and that's how you gain
Speaker 1: your respect and we're able to uh have something. You know,
Speaker 1: if you were a leader of something, then of course
Speaker 1: you were treated well and you got what you want,
Speaker 1: what you needed when you needed it. If you were
Speaker 1: a contributor in some other way, the same deal. If
Speaker 1: you contributed nothing to them, you were kicked out of
Speaker 1: their out of their circle, and you got to go
Speaker 1: off into the woods and figure out your life on
Speaker 1: your own future.
Speaker 2: Very soon here as the other world nations say, we're
Speaker 2: no longer going to settle in dollars, so they don't
Speaker 2: need dollars.
Speaker 1: We're not going to time believing that that won't be
Speaker 1: a controlled demolition to move in some other aspect of
Speaker 1: the cut of the you know, world map that they
Speaker 1: also control as to be to be the new world
Speaker 1: power or whatever. We're just it's just going to be
Speaker 1: a swapping of territory, probably in new centralized headquarters, if
Speaker 1: you will, so.
Speaker 2: Like the great taking model.
Speaker 7: Yeah, right, like that.
Speaker 1: So once once they get, once they stap everything out
Speaker 1: of their their host, they usually let it collapse like
Speaker 1: every other empire. But I don't think they themselves. They
Speaker 1: slip away like a weasel each time. So I do
Speaker 1: think there's any issue for them. It's going to be
Speaker 1: our problem.
Speaker 2: Well, and I noticed that that war. You know, Lindsey
Speaker 2: Graham and others are just begging for war with Russia.
Speaker 2: It's like they need war as a cover story for
Speaker 2: whatever might love war. So weird they do, they do.
Speaker 2: And but the thing is for the American people. We
Speaker 2: are powerless to stop them. You know, they don't they
Speaker 2: don't listen to the people. Trump's abandon his own base
Speaker 2: by sweeping the Epstein files under the rug.
Speaker 7: Do you think that this is intentional too?
Speaker 1: Is that? Is that what it takes? Something like that? Like,
Speaker 1: what about all the other shit he's done? What about
Speaker 1: the Oracle thing? What about the the concept of five
Speaker 1: hundred billion dollars being spent that we had no saying.
Speaker 1: What about all these fucking also sodomites and sex offenders
Speaker 1: and child harmers in these tech uh, these tech industries
Speaker 1: that are being called upon, and this fucking psychopath carbon
Speaker 1: palant here being so involved in our government. How is
Speaker 1: that not the tipping point? Why is it the Epstein thing? Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, okay, So as an example, if anyone is
Speaker 1: found doing horrible, horrible things to children from any of
Speaker 1: these other groups that he just uh you know, put
Speaker 1: in charge of our of our destiny and our and
Speaker 1: our deaths, these tech the AI fucking gang, there's not
Speaker 1: nothing's gonna happen to them either, because he just proved
Speaker 1: it with the Epstein thing. So if you look at
Speaker 1: it in that respect, okay, yeah, I see how the
Speaker 1: Epstein thing is a big deal. But other than that,
Speaker 1: it's like, why was that the thing? Why was twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen when he became a shavad not that not the
Speaker 1: tipping point? When when he had dual loyalty and he's
Speaker 1: our fucking president. You know, just because he's not a
Speaker 1: dual citizen doesn't mean he does. He doesn't have due
Speaker 1: Actually he doesn't have dual loyalty. He has single loyalty.
Speaker 1: And it's not to us. Why so why isn't that
Speaker 1: the issue? Why isn't that the issue? This other stuff.
Speaker 1: I don't care how deep and horrible the Epstein thing,
Speaker 1: that's still superficial compared to the simple fact that he
Speaker 1: shouldn't be there in the first place, and you should
Speaker 1: have had the fucking presence that well in any of
Speaker 1: the presidents that came after uh Jeff accident, except for
Speaker 1: maybe except for maybe well Jackson van Buren JFK potentially,
Speaker 1: But who else did we have after that or before
Speaker 1: that or in between that? Not a whole lot of
Speaker 1: fucking good people. It would to like, uh demystify and
Speaker 1: kind of break down the spirit if if Trump personified
Speaker 1: for a lot of people, like the heart of the
Speaker 1: American dream or Americanism to kind of destroy it by
Speaker 1: his betrayal.
Speaker 7: Do you think that was.
Speaker 1: Kind of like part of that disillusionment to kind of
Speaker 1: weaken the people's resolve.
Speaker 2: That would be the Yuri Besmianov demoralization stage right, Yeah,
Speaker 2: for America. Maybe, I don't know. I don't know if
Speaker 2: that's what's happening. Possibly, but I feel like America is demoralized,
Speaker 2: you know, especially right now. People voted for Trump, they
Speaker 2: voted for peace, they voted for releasing the Epstein files,
Speaker 2: they voted to end the toxic mRNA injections. None of
Speaker 2: those things have happened.
Speaker 1: And you mentioned I think pretty much people voted for
Speaker 1: not Biden. I don't think they've voted for all those others.
Speaker 1: Did anybody really vote for the Epstein stuff? Did anybody
Speaker 1: really vote for I mean maybe for you know, putting
Speaker 1: a halt on immigration, flipping it around. They should have
Speaker 1: put it if they wanted to actually do something, should
Speaker 1: have put a twenty five year moratorium on it all together.
Speaker 1: And then did the Ice thing. You can't have thousands
Speaker 1: coming in and four hundred going out. That's stupid, it's
Speaker 1: it's it's it's play. It's taking stand from one pail
Speaker 1: and putting in another and then throwing it back in.
Speaker 1: Oh look see what I'm doing. I'm doing stuff. I'm
Speaker 1: being I'm I'm being keeping busy. Isn't that something? Wow?
Speaker 1: Look at me, Look at how busy I am. It's stupid.
Speaker 1: And earlier the the Schofield Bible. So that was so
Speaker 1: that kind of came a little bit before after John Darby,
Speaker 1: and we're talking about the Plymouth Brethren, the Exclusive Brethren.
Speaker 1: There are all kinds of brethrens, Moravian, Bohemian. There was
Speaker 1: also the Asiatic Brethren. Now why I mentioned the Asiatic
Speaker 1: because it's kind of different than the rest, is that
Speaker 1: that was one of Jacob Frank's like like brother in
Speaker 1: laws or something that our cousins or something something like
Speaker 1: that that ran that It was literally like Illuminati.
Speaker 7: But frank Ism.
Speaker 1: They themselves all got baptized, like twenty six thousand of them,
Speaker 1: including Jacob Frank because the Roman Catholic Church or whatever,
Speaker 1: if we want to believe that at least at least
Speaker 1: the monarchs thought that this was a bridge to the
Speaker 1: to Judaism to try to get them to kind of
Speaker 1: like convert or meet a common.
Speaker 7: Ground, but it was all a ruse.
Speaker 1: Like Jacob Frank used to burn the talmud in public,
Speaker 1: but that would get that was public display for public perception.
Speaker 1: Most of the stuff that the Tumut allows, they were
Speaker 1: all over with. Things that they had as laws they
Speaker 1: discarded because this was a quote unquote Messianic age where
Speaker 1: that stuff doesn't apply anymore. And they were into things
Speaker 1: like incest, blood drinking, child rape, passing around your children,
Speaker 1: passing around your wives, all the stuff they think that
Speaker 1: the elites are into. They're the ones who actually, once
Speaker 1: they were baptized, they established these brethrens. So that idea
Speaker 1: and where Zionism comes from is Frankism is the lure
Speaker 1: in Cabbala prior to that. So when people talk Zionism,
Speaker 1: but they won't talk about Francism, they say, oh, that's
Speaker 1: blah blah blah, you're just trying to pigeonhole that number.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, if you want to understand what's really
Speaker 1: going on, you can go ahead and just research what
Speaker 1: those people are up to, and you'll know exactly what
Speaker 1: where Zion them is that is going and why they've
Speaker 1: been so vicious every time, Like the World Zionism Council,
Speaker 1: how they got us in the world one and two,
Speaker 1: all that stuff and their bloodthirsty hatred and their proclamation
Speaker 1: to destroy the goy constantly. This is all coming from
Speaker 1: that Luri in Cabbala, where it was their duty to
Speaker 1: actively get involved in becoming, you know, bringing this eschatology
Speaker 1: that they believed in to its end. And those Christians
Speaker 1: seem like they're all for it because they think by
Speaker 1: ending the world for everybody, they're going to get to
Speaker 1: see Jesus in their lifetime.
Speaker 7: Well, that's what you're talking about. Way to kill everybody, right?
Speaker 1: Like, why what if I just wanted to live my
Speaker 1: life and raise my children in the Christian way and
Speaker 1: have a good life, and you know, see how far
Speaker 1: I could achieve and succeed without any artificial limits on
Speaker 1: me to do so, without any backhanded deals to make
Speaker 1: other people excel beyond me, with all the stuff that
Speaker 1: the system creates to make certain people winners and everybody
Speaker 1: else a loser. What if I just wanted to live
Speaker 1: in that natural world you know that God had intended
Speaker 1: us for it to have. Why is that not Christian?
Speaker 1: Why do I why do I need to go see
Speaker 1: their guy in my lifetime. If it's going to happen anyway,
Speaker 1: what's the rush.
Speaker 2: I'm really glad you brought up this point because I've
Speaker 2: noticed this too among many Christian Zionists that they are
Speaker 2: really apocalypse accelerationists. So they want an end times doomsday event,
Speaker 2: and they tend to cite Revelation and they are incorrectly
Speaker 2: reading Revelation very clearly. I've been in numerous debates with
Speaker 2: people about this where they say, oh, no, Revelation nineteen
Speaker 2: is Jesus coming out of the sky flying on a
Speaker 2: white horse, and I'm like, no, it's not. It's that's
Speaker 2: actually a giant meteor that's on a collision course. It's
Speaker 2: very clear. All the seven trumpets, all the seven bowls,
Speaker 2: the seals, they all.
Speaker 1: True. That is that? What's clear about that? Because I
Speaker 1: think that implies space and things coming into a atmosphere
Speaker 1: and all that stuff. I have our I don't know, yeah, maybe, yeah, maybe,
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Describe common impacts very clear. There's no question if you
Speaker 2: just read it honestly, now, whether you think John of
Speaker 2: pat Moss actually got the correct message or what was
Speaker 2: he seeing the past? Was he seeing the future. Did
Speaker 2: it already happen in seventy a d. I don't know.
Speaker 1: That's an interesting thing that he brings up there, you know,
Speaker 1: the It's coming, Well, that was that was written contemporary
Speaker 1: for that time. So chances are whatever they talked about
Speaker 1: already happened. If it happened, but in a lot of
Speaker 1: times they would do this thing would be called prophecy
Speaker 1: after the fact, so they would be telling you something
Speaker 1: that was going to happen because it already did. And
Speaker 1: that's how you know, when people will look back on it,
Speaker 1: they think, oh, wow, these guys are profits. These guys
Speaker 1: are you know, like Notion Damas type people.
Speaker 2: Nowhere in Revelation nineteen does it say Jesus is on
Speaker 2: a horse flying out of the sky. Doesn't say that
Speaker 2: at all, But that's what people have been taught. And
Speaker 2: it's bewildering to me that they a lot of Christians
Speaker 2: they want to just they want to die because they
Speaker 2: think then Jesus is going to save them. So they
Speaker 2: don't mind a global nuclear war as long as Jerusalem
Speaker 2: is in charge.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 1: It's yeah, there's that whole God. Oh, it's God's will.
Speaker 1: If you can convince the people that what's happening is
Speaker 1: God's will. Then they sit there and take whatever their
Speaker 1: punishment is because it's God's will. Who am I to
Speaker 1: go against God's will? So people who have able hands
Speaker 1: that God gave them right, we're waiting for My point
Speaker 1: here and I didn't really state it, but we're waiting
Speaker 1: for something to save us. Well, every person that's born
Speaker 1: on earth that's able bodied, God did send with the
Speaker 1: capacity of the ability to make something better. The fact
Speaker 1: that we're not doing it, sitting around waiting for this
Speaker 1: one guy, that's that's that's that's the psychological warfare of religion.
Speaker 1: To think that there is this meglomaniac only one type
Speaker 1: of scenario. Each and every one of us and our
Speaker 1: collective strength together is way more overwhelming and powerful than
Speaker 1: this evil is. But we've all been the lions have
Speaker 1: been conditioned to believe that.
Speaker 7: The the mice don't do anything.
Speaker 1: They don't help other people that are in you know, danger,
Speaker 1: they don't speak out for them, they don't give a
Speaker 1: voice to those who have no voice, They don't do
Speaker 1: any of that stuff. They don't even try to protect
Speaker 1: their own children. Because it's so ingrained up here this
Speaker 1: is where the whole battle starts and ends. And if
Speaker 1: they can flip people, they don't need to do anything else.
Speaker 1: It's all hands off after that because they've already been
Speaker 1: convinced that it's God's will.
Speaker 7: And then that's it. You know, this is the way
Speaker 7: it's going to go.
Speaker 2: But that's but that is I mean, that's it's an
Speaker 2: aspect of the cult to say that right to almost
Speaker 2: people and start a nuclear war because it's God's will.
Speaker 2: But that's Jesus didn't stand for that at all.
Speaker 1: Right, and he right, there's gonna be this big apocalypse,
Speaker 1: so this big armageddon. Remember, there's gotta be all this
Speaker 1: horrible shit. Because God wants his creation to be destroyed, well,
Speaker 1: then he's not our God. That's not what the beneble
Speaker 1: creator would do. You know, if you think about the
Speaker 1: law of contrivation conservation of the universe, if that's a thing,
Speaker 1: then that would indicate that nothing's made just for the
Speaker 1: sake of doing so. So why would anything that creates
Speaker 1: want to destroy it? What would be the point of
Speaker 1: creating in the first place. And if you just think
Speaker 1: about that in that logic, then obviously this is something
Speaker 1: else infiltrating our minds to make us think that a
Speaker 1: good God wants to see suffering and that he wouldn't
Speaker 1: suffer along with us and be heartbroken, especially if you
Speaker 1: think that after allowing something like that to happen, that
Speaker 1: you somehow garnered some favor with him and that you've
Speaker 1: earned something. You haven't earn shit if you want to.
Speaker 1: If you want an afterlife, earn the one you got.
Speaker 1: He also said, you know, the Kingdom of Heaven is within,
Speaker 1: so you don't need a middleman, right, You don't need
Speaker 1: a middleman to help you to jump through hoops in
Speaker 1: order to get to them.
Speaker 7: Greater things than I shall you do?
Speaker 1: Right, there's all this in your so basically you're saying,
Speaker 1: I'm not a meglomaniac. You know I'm not the only
Speaker 1: one here. You know you can have that relationship with
Speaker 1: God too. And anything else that they said or said
Speaker 1: that he said that made it seem like he was
Speaker 1: somehow saying that you have to worship him.
Speaker 7: I don't think that was.
Speaker 1: I think that's either an interpretation issue or it's deliberately
Speaker 1: changed to give power to the church, because but the
Speaker 1: church that they developed in his name is completely in
Speaker 1: opposition to what you.
Speaker 2: What he taught, that's right. So I mean, why.
Speaker 1: Would you think that, like even the consider the idea
Speaker 1: of the Society of Jesus or the Jesuits, that whole
Speaker 1: concept is wrong because that's not where the focus was
Speaker 1: supposed to be. It was supposed to be with the Father, right, right.
Speaker 2: Right, But then then we have to go into the
Speaker 2: whole history of the Vatican and the consolation of power,
Speaker 2: and the rewriting of Paul's teachings, the counterfeiting of Second
Speaker 2: Peter and all these.
Speaker 1: Things, and all this is what I'm saying, is the
Speaker 1: part that doesn't make a difference what a bunch of
Speaker 1: people said and has been stomped on harder than a
Speaker 1: fucking Grammar coke, you know, I mean, what's left of
Speaker 1: it that's actually original? What? What are we Why are
Speaker 1: we worried about and trying to study that stuff? How
Speaker 1: is that relevant to our daily lives? Why are we
Speaker 1: looking into that which is probably of all deception and
Speaker 1: all man made in the first place, you know, and
Speaker 1: making things way more complicated than necessary. How is that
Speaker 1: become How has that become more important? Then you're one
Speaker 1: on one daily relationship with something higher, something that guides
Speaker 1: you with God. Why is opening up that fucking book
Speaker 1: that grimoire so much more important than your actual real
Speaker 1: life relationship with that benevolent creator. Why shouldn't that be
Speaker 1: the focus and all the other stuff should just be like, Okay,
Speaker 1: well that's it's a really nice story. Actually it's kind
Speaker 1: of a creepy story. But you have fun with that.
Speaker 1: I'm going to just continue to do it with them.
Speaker 1: This is what really with they all labeled as gnostics,
Speaker 1: were saying, it's like, what is this you know? And
Speaker 1: everything that they depict they depicted with a duality to it.
Speaker 1: That's sometimes he's a great guy. Sometimes he wants to
Speaker 1: destroy everybody and tells you to go kill them all,
Speaker 1: leave nothing alive, not even the animals, take off, take
Speaker 1: you know, and then take the the young boys and
Speaker 1: girls for yourself. Well that sounds like an eolent creator.
Speaker 2: These kinds of issues right in order to understand the
Speaker 2: Vatican was all about centralized control, whereas Jesus of Nazareth
Speaker 2: was as you say, he was about really decentralization of
Speaker 2: God's faith that everybody has access to it directly.
Speaker 1: So who had these who had the ideas of what
Speaker 1: was moral, just and right in the first place. I
Speaker 1: guess here's my theory. It should be something that is
Speaker 1: ingrained within you naturally at birth. It should be something
Speaker 1: that's part of you that you just inherently know intuitively,
Speaker 1: because intuition is that connection with God. Your intuition, your
Speaker 1: gut feeling, that is the communication. You can see it
Speaker 1: however you want, but it's not biological, it's spiritual. So
Speaker 1: if you have this intuition and you order this instinct
Speaker 1: of knowing what's right and what's wrong, why do you
Speaker 1: need a book written by or you know, whatever scroll
Speaker 1: or whatever written by someone else to tell you what
Speaker 1: you should be obvious? Because then they add a bunch
Speaker 1: of shit, a lot of hoops for you to jump through,
Speaker 1: a lot of you gotter do this, you got to
Speaker 1: do that. And it's like, how does that have to
Speaker 1: do with the moral construct or ethical nature of understanding
Speaker 1: what's writing what's wrong? And if you can't figure out
Speaker 1: what's right and what's wrong on your own, instinctively, inherently,
Speaker 1: then I don't think you have a connection or tether
Speaker 1: to that creator. And those are the people who would
Speaker 1: have to be taught what you should already know. Those
Speaker 1: are the people who would have to be you know,
Speaker 1: have it all written out for them, have it all
Speaker 1: spelled out for them. And this is another indicator of
Speaker 1: who the books were written by and who they were
Speaker 1: written for, because those people didn't Their concept of reality
Speaker 1: came from our people, and they utilized that so that
Speaker 1: they wouldn't cannibalize one another in their efforts to destroy
Speaker 1: everyone that wasn't them. No infighting. The whole idea of
Speaker 1: the law of the stranger. The Ten Commandments weren't for us.
Speaker 1: They didn't apply to us. They'd applied to them. That
Speaker 1: was so they didn't fuck each other up while they
Speaker 1: were should have been more busy fucking us up. If
Speaker 1: a stranger or a someone outside of their click came
Speaker 1: passing through, they were fair game. None of those rules applied,
Speaker 1: so these weren't holy men.
Speaker 2: And if anything, when Jesus went into the temple, he
Speaker 2: overturned the tables, he set the animals free. He said,
Speaker 2: stop this silly sacrifice. Why are you killing animals in
Speaker 2: the name of God. God doesn't need you to murder animals.
Speaker 2: That doesn't absolve you of your sins, which is what all.
Speaker 1: The yes, stop swinging those damn chicken it's buddy Jews.
Speaker 2: We're practicing, let's murder animals and then we're sin free.
Speaker 2: And Jesus said, that's nonsense.
Speaker 1: So if you swing a rabbi ever had three times,
Speaker 1: does that absolve you of having to have, you know,
Speaker 1: loyalty to Israel. Yeah, it just kind of points to
Speaker 1: the fact that their god isn't your god. It's not
Speaker 1: the creator, because why would the creator who can create
Speaker 1: anything you want and need you to send the dead
Speaker 1: one of it back?
Speaker 7: Oh, here you go, here's a gift.
Speaker 1: Well thanks, That's like putting flaming poop on somebody's porch
Speaker 1: and saying it's a gift.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 7: That's how does that? How does that worship anything? By giving?
Speaker 1: By doing a sacrifice like that, and when it's not
Speaker 1: you that's losing anything out, like sacrificing a child, that's
Speaker 1: just purely evil.
Speaker 7: Why would that?
Speaker 1: Sorry, doesn't sacrifice mean you do without? Isn't that what
Speaker 1: an actual I'm sacrificing my time, I'm sacrificing my effort,
Speaker 1: I'm sacrificing my energy, sacrificing by giving something to someone
Speaker 1: else or I don't know, if you just go go
Speaker 1: ahead and break something that you own or kill one
Speaker 1: of your one of your livestock, how is that a sacrifice?
Speaker 1: Did that hurt you? Are you the one believing to
Speaker 1: death on the altar? So how is that a sacrifice?
Speaker 1: That's just murder. It's just murder. And if it's a child,
Speaker 1: then it's a freaking absolute, most disgusting thing you could
Speaker 1: possibly do.
Speaker 7: I'll be pleasing to a god.
Speaker 1: But in the Old Testament, oh man, I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: that was Yahoo, sabaoath, that was ball, that was something else,
Speaker 1: that was that was not, that was Saturn, that was
Speaker 1: not that was not a benevolent creator. And if they
Speaker 1: mixed two storylines together to make it appear more schizophrenic,
Speaker 1: where God's staying too contradictory things, I think it's because
Speaker 1: of translations being skewed, maybe based on ignorance, maybe based
Speaker 1: on filling in blanks because they didn't have information, but
Speaker 1: or just the rewrites that happened at Consul and I
Speaker 1: see you and beyond just to kind of like whatever.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the hell the reasoning is, but
Speaker 1: Old Testament reasons, I don't know, Like there's so many
Speaker 1: vindictive acts that quote unquote their God is up to
Speaker 1: and it falls in perfect linement if when you read
Speaker 1: about who the Saturn cult people were about, they were
Speaker 1: it was a demonology. This is where I going into
Speaker 1: the other and I think this is where he cuts
Speaker 1: some or they cut some. It wasn't about a god.
Speaker 1: They didn't have a creator god history. They never considered
Speaker 1: an idea of a creator until they met a certain
Speaker 1: group of people we called the Norsemen a long long
Speaker 1: time ago. But before that it was all about worship,
Speaker 1: being powers and principalities, demonology, things that they could conjure
Speaker 1: and sacrifice too. But it wasn't It didn't have a
Speaker 1: creating invocations. Just like we saw earlier today that the
Speaker 1: Limit or Oto or whatever you want to call it,
Speaker 1: all the stupid names, they're still practicing the same shit,
Speaker 1: the same stuff. I mean. McGregor Mathers was deciphering an
Speaker 1: old text that he had and poorly stole it published
Speaker 1: it on his own, but all that had lost information
Speaker 1: as to how they should go about their ceremonies and
Speaker 1: conduct their rituals. That was a throwback to a more
Speaker 1: ancient time where this was more prevalent and more widely known,
Speaker 1: So it was more of like a restoration of the
Speaker 1: old waves of the cult in the time of the
Speaker 1: seventeen hundreds to the present day where they were re
Speaker 1: establishing their cult practices, and they line up perfectly with
Speaker 1: what was discussed that was happening, and one fills in
Speaker 1: the blanks with the other as to what the Edenites
Speaker 1: were up to when our ancestors encountered them and were
Speaker 1: repulsed by the things that they saw creator or a
Speaker 1: creator God concept until they met what we now call
Speaker 1: Indo Europeans.
Speaker 2: So let's I want to bring this back to a
Speaker 2: really practical question too, because.
Speaker 1: I said a lot of different things just to not
Speaker 1: say the word Arian.
Speaker 2: A lot of people believe this claim that modern day
Speaker 2: Israeli is often saying, well, God promised this land to
Speaker 2: us because he made a covenant with Abraham. Well, Daniel,
Speaker 2: aren't aren't aren't the Palestinians the offspring of it?
Speaker 1: Isn't Abraham just a made up fucking tool of the
Speaker 1: Saturn cult. Isn't there a big giant cube in the
Speaker 1: same part of Mecca where Abraham was supposed to have been.
Speaker 1: Isn't the Dome of the Rock that's in au with that.
Speaker 1: I forgot the al what else side the hell? I
Speaker 1: can't remember the name. I'll ask, I'll ask, whatever the
Speaker 1: fuck is. Well, this is the dome of the rock.
Speaker 1: It's where it is in a that's where they want
Speaker 1: to do the sacrifice for the red heifers. At first
Speaker 1: I talked about Mecanonim talking about this place, that rock
Speaker 1: that's supposed to be where Isaac was going to get whacked,
Speaker 1: and it's where Abraham, if he was a real dude,
Speaker 1: was killing all the fucking uh animals prior to that.
Speaker 1: This dude got into a because back then they didn't
Speaker 1: smoke things. They they created a tent and they fumigated.
Speaker 1: The dude gets drugged out of his mind, thinks he's
Speaker 1: you know, his schizophrenia kicks in, thinks he's hearing voices.
Speaker 1: Probably is, and uh, they're telling him to kill his son,
Speaker 1: and he's all for it. And then what sobriety hits.
Speaker 1: Something happens and then he's like, oh cool, my bloodlust
Speaker 1: is going to be now fulfilled by a goat that's
Speaker 1: stuck in some fucking bush. You're lucky, Isaac. What the
Speaker 1: fuck that's that's that's that dude, right, there was the
Speaker 1: one that they based three potentially or allegedly positive religions
Speaker 1: off of. If he wasn't fake, still fuck him Abraham. Yes, yeah,
Speaker 1: And I think it's funny. Why don't you call it
Speaker 1: anti Judaic rather than anti Semitic when there's more than
Speaker 1: once semi type out there.
Speaker 7: It's a language group, right.
Speaker 1: So I wouldn't because by that definition, I think that
Speaker 1: Israelis are the most anti Semitic people out there because
Speaker 1: they're killing Gosins, right, because the Gozins are and they're
Speaker 1: always at war without Arabs, So aren't they the most
Speaker 1: anti Semitic people out there?
Speaker 2: Right? But but my point is this covenant, so called
Speaker 2: covenant with Abraham, which was then, of course later violated
Speaker 2: by the Israelis of the time and you know, or
Speaker 2: for hundreds years after that, right, numerous times, violating the
Speaker 2: covenant earning God.
Speaker 1: I'm surprised he didn't bring up Jacob. He you know,
Speaker 1: Israel struggles with God. Oh, that's stuff. I'm surprised. I think, come.
Speaker 2: Up's wrath in God's judgment?
Speaker 1: Right, So whies it up to us to try to
Speaker 1: make amends for them? That's not that's against God's will? Right,
Speaker 1: if God has the power to do whatever he needs
Speaker 1: to do, and he seems like he's allowing him them.
Speaker 1: If we're if we don't think that there's like a
Speaker 1: free will thing here and we're just supposed to sit
Speaker 1: back and let this happen and help them.
Speaker 7: Well, don't they already control enough?
Speaker 1: For you know? There's x amount percent of them in
Speaker 1: every country this many, and they control all of this
Speaker 1: way up here, concluding media education, how education is handled,
Speaker 1: all of the banking, banking right, all the things that
Speaker 1: influence your daily activity in your daily life and limit
Speaker 1: your ability to grow that and also the let's not
Speaker 1: forget the fussint here is. And I didn't get a
Speaker 1: chance before you. I think he said something. If they
Speaker 1: already control all this, what other help do they need?
Speaker 1: What else do we need to do for them? We
Speaker 1: already fight their fucking wars, We already use their demonic
Speaker 1: monetary system. We already take their poisons that they call
Speaker 1: health care, the medicines, the form of kia, the sorcery,
Speaker 1: the potions, We inject their poisons. What what else do
Speaker 1: they need from us? And we try our best not
Speaker 1: to uh offend their their sensitivities and they are very
Speaker 1: very sensitive. So what else what else are we supposed
Speaker 1: to do carry their fucking groceries home for them? Like,
Speaker 1: what what else is it that we need to do
Speaker 1: for them?
Speaker 7: Kia or the allopathy? That's something that they also control.
Speaker 2: Right, that's right.
Speaker 7: And through their money they make CEOs.
Speaker 1: They don't they don't have there's nothing organic about a
Speaker 1: mega corporation. That doesn't happen in the natural world. But
Speaker 1: if you have unlimited funding and you can fail upward,
Speaker 1: meaning you can lose money in order to undercut and
Speaker 1: put other people out of business on your way to
Speaker 1: the top, like Amazon did, like with diapers dot Com
Speaker 1: and stuff like that, then they can pick their CEOs.
Speaker 1: And does anybody know that story of diapers dot Com?
Speaker 1: They had an original product and Amazon got ahold of
Speaker 1: the Yeah. I don't want to call it reverse engineer
Speaker 1: because it's a fucking diaper. But they started selling them
Speaker 1: for a loss just so that people would buy from
Speaker 1: Amazon and not them, and they put them out of business,
Speaker 1: and I think they absorbed their company. It's not like
Speaker 1: Bezos isn't politically involved in a lot of stuff. Isn't
Speaker 1: he like a he's he's a foreign ambassador basically, and
Speaker 1: he's now he's going into space with some fake stuff
Speaker 1: and Katy Perry and all that junk.
Speaker 2: You know, So it's not like you're so, how how
Speaker 2: do we?
Speaker 1: And that brings in the the Jeppar Potional Laboratory again.
Speaker 1: Doesn't it like they all have to do that ceremonial
Speaker 1: symbolic ritual on the on the high end, all of
Speaker 1: them run into space. You got Elon who was actually
Speaker 1: the same name is in the frecking Werner bron Braun
Speaker 1: book about going to Mars. Isn't that interesting? Are they
Speaker 1: just messing with us? I mean for the people watching this,
Speaker 1: or is the matrix just that good of having a
Speaker 1: sense of humor? Maybe we just need to lighten up
Speaker 1: and laugh with it.
Speaker 2: I mean, you know, this can go into a thousand
Speaker 2: different rabbit trails here, but I think most of the
Speaker 2: people watching this agree with you and I is that
Speaker 2: we don't want a global apocalypse, nuclear war.
Speaker 1: I mean, don't mean to interrupt again, but let me
Speaker 1: just ask you this isn't it funny? So so neo
Speaker 1: we're talking. Whenever anybody even says that anymore, they just
Speaker 1: immediately think the Matrix movie. So neo means new everybody
Speaker 1: knows that. But to be more grammatically correct about a person,
Speaker 1: wouldn't he be a neophyte, And isn't that a newbie,
Speaker 1: an initiate, an initiate, a newbie. So even in that
Speaker 1: movie there it's a Masonic ritual and then people are
Speaker 1: going through that ritual while they're watching the movie. Well,
Speaker 1: there's three cults out there that are making sure that
Speaker 1: we are going to be one way or the other,
Speaker 1: wrapped up, caught up in that right, because they're all
Speaker 1: the same basic eschatology, which is too much of an
Speaker 1: emphasis on the end of the time. And everybody who
Speaker 1: is religious in one, two or three, you know, Islam,
Speaker 1: Catholicism or Christianity because that has a that's been mixed
Speaker 1: up too, and then Judaism. But if you have a
Speaker 1: cult or a religion of supremacy anywhere, that shouldn't be
Speaker 1: allowed because that's no longer that's no longer just my
Speaker 1: regularly religious beliefs.
Speaker 7: That's something more.
Speaker 1: It's it's a group of people organizing to decide what
Speaker 1: to do with.
Speaker 7: The rest of us.
Speaker 2: Uh huh. It's offensive, offensive religion. But how do how
Speaker 2: do the rest of us who are not subjected, I mean,
Speaker 2: we don't buy into these some of these cult life
Speaker 2: like beliefs. How do we help the world survive this insanity?
Speaker 1: Ah?
Speaker 7: Man uh.
Speaker 1: And this is why people don't like when I'm on
Speaker 1: this show, because I'm not giving them a solution or
Speaker 1: something that's Oh, we've just act now and by this bill,
Speaker 1: you know, operators are standing by vote harder that I
Speaker 1: don't do that. I don't know what the answer is
Speaker 1: to that. Is there a way? I haven't found it yet.
Speaker 7: It's tough to It's tough to figure that out, isn't it.
Speaker 1: Because we can only inform those who are already willing
Speaker 1: and able, Like the ground has to already be tilled
Speaker 1: in order for that plant or that seed to grow.
Speaker 1: Otherwise you're going to be met with such fierce opposition
Speaker 1: because it's not something that they've heard before. And most
Speaker 1: people don't want to be told the truth. Most people
Speaker 1: want to be told what they expect to hear that's true.
Speaker 1: And if they don't hear that, they think that you're
Speaker 1: crazy or stupid, because don't you know this it's everywhere. Well,
Speaker 1: that's the because that's the easy when information is easy
Speaker 1: to gather, it's worth about as much as anything else
Speaker 1: that's free.
Speaker 2: Well, I hear a lot of Christians right now talking
Speaker 2: about Oh Jesus is coming back soon. They say, very soon,
Speaker 2: it's almost here.
Speaker 7: And of course, kill some more gossans, kill some more kids,
Speaker 7: that's all.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they got to burn some red heifers or something
Speaker 2: and destroy a temple, build a temple in Nuca City,
Speaker 2: and then Jesus is going to come back and going
Speaker 2: to save all of us. I'm like, going to save
Speaker 2: you who supported pedophilia and genocione? You think you're going
Speaker 2: to be saved by Jesus even red? Yeah?
Speaker 1: And why are we supposed to support a country that's
Speaker 1: a haven for pedophilia?
Speaker 7: Is your Jewish pedophile?
Speaker 2: Hey?
Speaker 1: That's that's but.
Speaker 2: So so this cognitive dissionence that a lot of people
Speaker 2: have in their heads. They're like, well, Jesus loves us,
Speaker 2: we're special, so we get to kill kids, oh yeah,
Speaker 2: or we get well.
Speaker 1: Because that line is so blurred right now that people
Speaker 1: don't realize that they're actually practicing that cult, are supporting
Speaker 1: it by supporting it, by being behind it, by not
Speaker 1: resisting it, by not calling it out. It's it's participation
Speaker 1: in evil.
Speaker 2: I mean, there's no other way to say it. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's an insane cult of lunar.
Speaker 1: If people weren't already wrapped up in their own it's
Speaker 1: almost like a selfish desire to confirm.
Speaker 7: What they've been with.
Speaker 1: You know, It's like, was it a waste of time
Speaker 1: for me to believe this my whole life, this religion?
Speaker 1: Is there a way for me to confirm that it
Speaker 1: wasn't all or not? And the only way to do
Speaker 1: that if it's not legitimate is to force the conditions
Speaker 1: to occur unnaturally and then make it happen, at least
Speaker 1: the destructive part, the death part, give them exactly what
Speaker 1: they want, which is the end of us, and then
Speaker 1: wait around for I'm sure he's just he's probably on
Speaker 1: the second Probably maybe he missed the first comment. Maybe
Speaker 1: maybe Jesus is on the next comment. You know what
Speaker 1: I mean. It's like, is there it Can it happen
Speaker 1: in my lifetime so I can be like a I
Speaker 1: told you, I'll be standing at the end of life,
Speaker 1: bust stop together, after we've all been murdered, will be
Speaker 1: in Valhalla waiting for the waiting on the bus that
Speaker 1: never comes, so or at least feel better about having
Speaker 1: this belief system. Oh, the Jews are giving me an
Speaker 1: opportunity to do that. Oh okay, well, then they can
Speaker 1: do no wrong. Because as long as I can confirm
Speaker 1: for myself that everything I've been taught is true and
Speaker 1: it hasn't been a waste of time, excellent.
Speaker 2: I don't know, man.
Speaker 1: The more that comes out to kind of like counter
Speaker 1: the traditional views of things, not the values, but the views,
Speaker 1: or to help you see that those who claim one
Speaker 1: thing never are holding up to the virtues, values, character, integrity,
Speaker 1: genuine sincerity of anything that they say that they stand for.
Speaker 1: Whether it's a politician or somebody behind the pulpit who's
Speaker 1: spewing Marxism and telling you that Jesus was a socialist.
Speaker 1: I mean, it doesn't it doesn't really matter where it
Speaker 1: comes from. The programming is so deeply embedded that people
Speaker 1: like us to answer your question like what are we
Speaker 1: supposed to do?
Speaker 7: I think we just keep on keeping on.
Speaker 1: It's been every time there's been a big change a
Speaker 1: little group, it's always been and always will until the end.
Speaker 1: And as far as Nirvana's lyrics applied to this, it
Speaker 1: was like three percent of the people that were involved
Speaker 1: in the revolution. And you can make your arguments as
Speaker 1: to whether or not that was all in the up
Speaker 1: and up or not, but it did help us seed
Speaker 1: a country that at least until the Civil War was
Speaker 1: on the right track and fighting because I had opposition
Speaker 1: since it's beginning. The bankers in many ways, through Hamilton Belmont,
Speaker 1: any of the other like even Baruch, any of the
Speaker 1: other banking agents began small who have pushed it along
Speaker 1: to where it finally got to. I mean, Belmont was
Speaker 1: very instrumental prior. He was the Bernard Baruch of his time,
Speaker 1: and that's why we have this big, huge upheaval, like
Speaker 1: we wouldn't even have that if you're not familiar with Belmont.
Speaker 1: He was instrumental, and you know, the creating the conditions
Speaker 1: that led to the Civil war. He was pushing hard
Speaker 1: on that. And it wasn't because they wanted to divide
Speaker 1: simply for the sake of divide, and they wanted to
Speaker 1: have America at war with itself because that's the only
Speaker 1: word that was sustainable from a distance, as if we
Speaker 1: were at war with each other to cause mass casualties,
Speaker 1: mass destruction, and chaos and then have And they did
Speaker 1: this from the very beginning. The North was always going
Speaker 1: to win because North represented centralized government and federalism, which
Speaker 1: is exactly centralized control, which is exactly what these people
Speaker 1: are all about. But complete and total devastation and trauma
Speaker 1: that lasts forever, ingrained into into our into our DNA
Speaker 1: was the result. It was always intended to end with
Speaker 1: everybody being enslaved, and it was always intended to be
Speaker 1: America destroyed. It doesn't matter where the casualty is laid,
Speaker 1: if they laid on North or South. The South was
Speaker 1: completely demolished and that left a huge debt which the
Speaker 1: bankers controlled, and that was the end of America. They won.
Speaker 1: Now is that to say that they have to study
Speaker 1: that way? Can we rally back? Maybe? But if you
Speaker 1: think about where Andrew Jackson took us out of completely
Speaker 1: out of debt, paid off the national debt, fought off
Speaker 1: the banking charter, fought wars that were sprung on us
Speaker 1: because we wouldn't reach charter. You know, the warving to
Speaker 1: tell was about that, all the intrigues that occurred all
Speaker 1: the way up until his time of presidency, they punished us.
Speaker 1: They had to devise a new plan. They couldn't fight
Speaker 1: a war from a distance. They had to do it here.
Speaker 1: And the only way to do that was to pit
Speaker 1: two factions together in America and have them kill each
Speaker 1: other and weaken the country. And at that point, you know,
Speaker 1: as secession was a perfect way to do that, because
Speaker 1: the consent of the government was the thing that had
Speaker 1: to go. Because splitting up the powers meant that the
Speaker 1: bankers were fearful that their taxation and their loans and
Speaker 1: all this other shit would be renigged on or they
Speaker 1: couldn't enforce them without a strong central government. So they
Speaker 1: had to implement a very strong, very over domineering, tyrannical,
Speaker 1: despotic central government. And that's what they started building after
Speaker 1: the war.
Speaker 7: Be concerned with this.
Speaker 1: If they didn't already take root and control our country
Speaker 1: like this wouldn't even be our argument, because they would
Speaker 1: not have penetrated our our education and our media to
Speaker 1: the point where we have to be the minority screaming
Speaker 1: into the void, hoping that somebody wants to hear it,
Speaker 1: not even so much as they can hear.
Speaker 7: But that they want to well, And I want to
Speaker 7: say that sounds bleak.
Speaker 1: I know that sounds bleak, but it's like once there's
Speaker 1: certain things in place, like have you have to challenge that,
Speaker 1: and there has to be some kind of nick in
Speaker 1: the armor. And that's why I would tell people. And
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that this is a perfect documentary, but
Speaker 1: I think everybody should watch. And I'm not telling you
Speaker 1: to come away with a different opinion than what you
Speaker 1: already have thought to believe. I'm just saying, listen to it,
Speaker 1: Europa the Last Battle. It's twelve hours long. I think
Speaker 1: you should watch it once and just watch it through.
Speaker 1: I think you to watch it a second time with
Speaker 1: a pen and paper, and anytime you get a wild
Speaker 1: moment like wow, that's not what I was taught. Whether
Speaker 1: you believe it easily or you are skeptical of it,
Speaker 1: I want you to write that down. And then I
Speaker 1: want you to go after the and write that down
Speaker 1: all throughout the the documentary. Then I want you to
Speaker 1: look up each and every one of those because this
Speaker 1: is how you deprogram, This is how you get somebody
Speaker 1: out is then you go and tell and find out
Speaker 1: what mainstream history in mainstream media and wiki and all
Speaker 1: those other system tools of the system say about it,
Speaker 1: and then see if you can also find researchers. Maybe
Speaker 1: you'll find some of my videos, maybe you'll find somebody
Speaker 1: else's people who actually put in the study and the
Speaker 1: time and effort to and see whether or not what
Speaker 1: they said about that particular wile moment that you saw
Speaker 1: in Europa? Is it the inversion of what they want
Speaker 1: you to believe through the mainstream history? And if so,
Speaker 1: how many of those sacked up over and over and
Speaker 1: over again where it's almost direct and absolute opposite the
Speaker 1: inversion of the truth that you that you encounter before
Speaker 1: you set to ask yourself, where the hell do I live?
Speaker 1: You know you're looking around like I already am I
Speaker 1: already in a damn prison?
Speaker 7: Is this already like a panopticon of surveillance?
Speaker 2: Well, let me mention it this way that I want
Speaker 2: to remind the audience the only cult you cannot see
Speaker 2: is the one you're in. And right, if you say
Speaker 2: to yourself cognitively, you say that, well, all all human
Speaker 2: beings are divine, all human beings are children of God.
Speaker 2: And then at the same.
Speaker 1: Time, so if that is true, then highlicks, those without
Speaker 1: the tether would be something other than other than human
Speaker 1: by that definition, not saying that it's biologically different or what,
Speaker 1: but that would mean that there's something else, a different presence.
Speaker 1: May you look a lot like us, but they might
Speaker 1: not be us.
Speaker 2: I'm you say, and it's okay to kill these other
Speaker 2: certain children because they're neighbors of Israel, then miss them.
Speaker 2: You are in a cult. Like That's that's the red
Speaker 2: flag right there. You're in a cult and you are
Speaker 2: blind to the truth because those are contradictory ideas. Or
Speaker 2: if you say I studied Jesus. Jesus taught love, he
Speaker 2: taught acceptance, he taught forgiveness, he taught kindness. Right, and
Speaker 2: let's bomb those doctors and bomb those hospitals. You are
Speaker 2: in a cult.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 1: He never said except for the except for these guys
Speaker 1: over here, Fuck those guys.
Speaker 7: He never said that, No, not at all.
Speaker 1: He never It was never one of those things. It's
Speaker 1: never like, yes, these are all great. But you know
Speaker 1: what's funny is the Old Testament did that because the
Speaker 1: whole when people go back to the Ten Commandments and
Speaker 1: they look at that, here's a funny story. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of the stranger those worlds only applied so that
Speaker 1: the tribes didn't cannibalize each other, so that they didn't
Speaker 1: murder each other and rip each other off, conduct usury,
Speaker 1: and destroy themselves from within. Those were to keep them
Speaker 1: from behaving like themselves and ruining their own people. If
Speaker 1: a stranger came through, and you can see this on
Speaker 1: the Kazari and sip stuff too, then it was fair game.
Speaker 7: They were fair game.
Speaker 1: You could rape them, you could rob them, you could
Speaker 1: murder them. It didn't matter because they were the stranger.
Speaker 1: They were the outsiders. And that itself is indicative of
Speaker 1: a cult, right.
Speaker 2: All right, it's not you, of course I'm talking about though,
Speaker 2: I'm talking about christ teachings and.
Speaker 7: Oh I know, I know, I'm talking about the ois.
Speaker 2: Iudand that I think what's necessary for anybody watching this
Speaker 2: is to examine your own beliefs, right, like, really honestly
Speaker 2: examine your own beliefs and find the contradictions. And it's
Speaker 2: I mean, it's okay to discover contradictions in your own
Speaker 2: belief system. It's important too, and then challenge yourself.
Speaker 1: Why would we be why would we accept or settle
Speaker 1: for a belief when we could know maybe the things
Speaker 1: that we can't know, aren't supposed to have an answer,
Speaker 1: and it can't be contradictory to what we morally understand
Speaker 1: to be right and not be wrong, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. Maybe there's things out there that we'll find
Speaker 1: over time, but maybe we don't need to have a
Speaker 1: belief to fill in for the moment. Maybe the belief
Speaker 1: thing is is the leading of astray, because beliefs are
Speaker 1: powerful things because they contradict logic and observation to override it.
Speaker 1: And that means that anybody who controls beliefs controls your
Speaker 1: perception of reality.
Speaker 2: If you were taught and you know, Daniel, here's another
Speaker 2: point is that people under the age of fifty are
Speaker 2: not buying into the Christian Zionism narratives by and large.
Speaker 2: But it's just really it's a generational thing. It's the
Speaker 2: Schofield Bible people.
Speaker 7: I think it's a comprehension level.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but these are also the same fucking kids that
Speaker 1: go picketing and go to college to be indoctrinated. So
Speaker 1: I'm not I don't think that this as a what
Speaker 1: do you call it? A hope for the future, especially
Speaker 1: the youth now being turned into social media mush in
Speaker 1: their brain. You know, it's it's short attention spans is
Speaker 1: just one tiny bit of it. But it's just the
Speaker 1: lack of substance. I see what my my stepson, who
Speaker 1: I'm not. I'm not trying to criticize right here, but
Speaker 1: the things his concepts of reality are very immature because
Speaker 1: he's young, you know, and what he's taught in school
Speaker 1: about history he believes, and it's the complete polar opposite
Speaker 1: of what reality is. And I try to show him
Speaker 1: when I can, you know, in small portions. I send
Speaker 1: him PDF books, I try to talk to him about stuff.
Speaker 1: I try to you know, he was in the Hamilton
Speaker 1: play and I try to tell him that, you know,
Speaker 1: Jefferson wasn't a racist idiot like they make him out
Speaker 1: to be. And it's just all these little things that
Speaker 1: they do to the foundational belief system that is going
Speaker 1: to be ingrained and embedded into our children is going
Speaker 1: to be really hard to right over the top of.
Speaker 1: You can't. You know, It's like a cassette tape, you know,
Speaker 1: you still have sometimes when you try to re record
Speaker 1: over something, a little bit of that residual from the
Speaker 1: previous recording that you can kind of still hear through
Speaker 1: the cassette. When you have it on high fidelity, you
Speaker 1: understand what I mean, like it's still part of them
Speaker 1: still there. That's really hard to shake off the issue
Speaker 1: with certain people who think that they're awake, because I
Speaker 1: can tell you there's levels in there's stages, and there's
Speaker 1: a process, and it's not something that just snaps into place,
Speaker 1: because we live in a constant state of this false
Speaker 1: reality being pumped out towards us like a big frequency
Speaker 1: being passed through us all the time. So even if
Speaker 1: we comprehend it on one level, I think there's deeper
Speaker 1: levels that we need to also allow information, time, experience
Speaker 1: reading to kind of help chip away to a further
Speaker 1: and more deeper understanding as we go just how insidious
Speaker 1: certain things are. Because I think some people who don't
Speaker 1: buy certain things they that's fine, that's a great place
Speaker 1: to start, But the whys and the hows and the
Speaker 1: who's are important, so you know who to focus your
Speaker 1: energy against and who to support. Because they've also inverted
Speaker 1: all the heroes into demons and all the demons into heroes.
Speaker 1: So it's really easy to still take somebody who's in malcontent,
Speaker 1: who doesn't agree with a certain thing, and they'll manipulate
Speaker 1: those people into being the opposition that they need so
Speaker 1: they can have their fake little.
Speaker 7: Conflicts, just like the Adel does.
Speaker 1: You know, they do this thing where they fund their
Speaker 1: opposition so that they can point to it and say, look,
Speaker 1: we need more funding because they're out to get you.
Speaker 7: Yeah, you know what I mean. And that's something that
Speaker 7: happens a lot.
Speaker 1: As long as they're the ones creating the counter argument,
Speaker 1: they can control the counter argument, and they can suck
Speaker 1: up real people into those things, even if it's manipulated
Speaker 1: and controlled by agents or whatnot. Good people with good
Speaker 1: intentions can get sucked up into that because they thought
Speaker 1: that these people stood for the same ideals that they did,
Speaker 1: which is to get people back to.
Speaker 7: Freedom, and it's going to the wrong direction.
Speaker 2: There's also there's an astonishing lack of self awareness I've
Speaker 2: noticed among many Israeli people today who support the genocide
Speaker 2: and they think they still think they are the victims.
Speaker 1: They can't not because that destroys because what they're doing
Speaker 1: is so horrific, is so unconscionable, it's so you can't
Speaker 1: you can't just you can't excuse it, you can't talk
Speaker 1: it away. The only way is to demonize that group
Speaker 1: of people and to call them all terrorists. Children, babies
Speaker 1: are terrorists, right mind you they went and killed for
Speaker 1: the last seven years their families, creating the animosity in
Speaker 1: the first place. Here's a question that they should ask
Speaker 1: themselves and people who want to support Israel, if Israel
Speaker 1: for what, just hypothetically, I'm not saying to do anything harmful.
Speaker 7: I'm just saying, if if Israel didn't.
Speaker 1: Exist as the antagonist in the Middle East, how many
Speaker 1: other Middle Eastern countries, Arabs, whatever you want to call them,
Speaker 1: South North Africans, whatever, how many of them would continue
Speaker 1: to pursue a nuclear program outside of outside of you know,
Speaker 1: maybe power nuclear power, because the deserts kind of require
Speaker 1: something else that's not conventional. How many of them would
Speaker 1: continue to pursue weapons that would require that would be
Speaker 1: necessary for them to defend themselves against a psychopathic country
Speaker 1: that's always bombing people inside their borders. If that didn't occur,
Speaker 1: if that person was if that entity wasn't there to
Speaker 1: cause the chaos and the disruption, would they even pursue.
Speaker 2: Probably not program? Probably not. I mean, even you know,
Speaker 2: Iranian leadership has spoken about the fact that they despise.
Speaker 1: If you were never attacked, would you feel the need
Speaker 1: to carry a gun. I'm not saying every I think
Speaker 1: everybody should because of the world that we live in.
Speaker 1: But it's kind of the point there, right, If there
Speaker 1: wasn't a threat to them, the next sistential threat to
Speaker 1: them at all times, if that was removed and they
Speaker 1: never knew an Israel, would there be this need to
Speaker 1: build weapons to defend themselves. There would be no would
Speaker 1: avation too.
Speaker 2: Really, it is the idea of nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: So should we destroy every other country or make the
Speaker 1: one that's antagonizing all those people settle the f down.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I think we should denuclearize Israel. And Israel's
Speaker 2: nuclear weapons are illegal and undeclared. Israel did not sign
Speaker 2: the Non Proliferation Treaty. They do not allow IAEA inspectors
Speaker 2: into their facilities. You know, it's very clear by international law.
Speaker 2: And actually China has said this, Russia has said this,
Speaker 2: even elements of the UK have said this.
Speaker 1: That Israel and China work together on the nuclear program.
Speaker 1: Just saying red China red.
Speaker 2: China reels in gross violation of international law, has no
Speaker 2: justification for bombing Iran, bombing Gaza, bombing Lebanon.
Speaker 1: I mean, historically the lawless Iranians were led by yours, right,
Speaker 1: because you talk about Iran is Araya, which if you
Speaker 1: put an end at the end of the name, kind
Speaker 1: of gives you who it used to be. The like Persia,
Speaker 1: they indus Valley, we're talking about Aryans, That's what I'm
Speaker 1: trying to say, that whole area. So their blood is
Speaker 1: still in these people. So we're basically killing people who
Speaker 1: could potentially be allies to mankind, maybe not so much
Speaker 1: to our governments, right, and they could be they could
Speaker 1: have ancestral blood as well. So once again we're sent
Speaker 1: out to kill the very people that we should be
Speaker 1: aligned with. How many people were the German language was
Speaker 1: almost adopted for this country, That's how many Germanic people
Speaker 1: were here. And know what do we do? And we
Speaker 1: obliterate them in a war. But we are getting stoked
Speaker 1: into war against people who, just like with Libya, those
Speaker 1: people had a great leader who cared about their people
Speaker 1: and he actually wrote a green book because he wanted
Speaker 1: it to catch on. You know, I had to go
Speaker 1: back and look at Saddam and see if everything that
Speaker 1: they said about that guy was real because he was cursing.
Speaker 1: He was cursing the the he said long live the people.
Speaker 1: When he was you know, convin you know, they said
Speaker 1: that he was going they you know, put out the sentence,
Speaker 1: say yeah, when he's being convicted. When he was in
Speaker 1: court and they were hitting down the sentence, he said,
Speaker 1: you know this is corrupt, this is this is a
Speaker 1: a what do you call it? It's a word in
Speaker 1: valid court system and long lived the people. So a
Speaker 1: psychopathic dictator doesn't care about the people. He wouldn't be
Speaker 1: saying long live the people and that he was going
Speaker 1: to be uh hung, he said long with the people.
Speaker 1: Now that that doesn't sound like a dictator or a
Speaker 1: tyrant to me, that sounds like somebody who did everything
Speaker 1: you could to keep a rock away from these suns adventures.
Speaker 2: We know, even back then, the whole justification for the attack,
Speaker 2: for the whole Gulf War, it was it was fabricated
Speaker 2: weapons of mass destruction, totally fabricated, just like right now,
Speaker 2: totally fabricated or Israel the benefit, Yeah, for Israel's benefit, absolutely,
Speaker 2: So it's the same playbook. The difference is that now
Speaker 2: Iran has ballistic missiles that really work and that very
Speaker 2: nearly took out Israel in twelve days.
Speaker 7: Yeah, here's a funny thing.
Speaker 1: I've been asking myself because I don't know if this
Speaker 1: was true on social media. Okay, so this is longer
Speaker 1: than the one that I was watching on right on.
Speaker 1: I think maybe something happened with that upload. Maybe that's
Speaker 1: why I thought it was choppy, And.
Speaker 7: Maybe you know more about this, Mike.
Speaker 1: I don't get a chance to really go too deep
Speaker 1: into this and spend all this time. I got a
Speaker 1: daughter out all kinds of activities. But they were showing
Speaker 1: this is social media. I've shown you these videos where
Speaker 1: they're saying missiles from Iran hitting Gaza, and I thought
Speaker 1: that was really weird, right, because like, why would Iran
Speaker 1: be hitting starving, dying people if it was actually Iran
Speaker 1: doing it, or if they were just using the cover
Speaker 1: of war to do themselves, or or wouldn't it be
Speaker 1: cool because they would never tell us this. They would
Speaker 1: never ever tell us this because they wouldn't want to
Speaker 1: appear weak to the world that Iran was taking out
Speaker 1: IDF that were harming Gasans by those targeted strikes, and
Speaker 1: wouldn't that be cool? Wouldn't that at least make you
Speaker 1: feel good about mankind a little bit that they would
Speaker 1: give those those people that are suffering in that little
Speaker 1: fish bowl that they that they're dying in and starving
Speaker 1: in a chance to either get out of there or
Speaker 1: right back. I'm sure that's not what really occurred. I'm
Speaker 1: sure with social media misinformation, but it just it kind
Speaker 1: of makes you want to believe that that was a thing.
Speaker 1: And again, they would never tell us that if it was,
Speaker 1: if that did occur, because that would reemphasize the fact
Speaker 1: that that's a bad thing that they're doing, and another
Speaker 1: country that's being attacked is actually helping someone within their borders.
Speaker 7: Missiles. And they were just like going like.
Speaker 1: This when it is really, you know, outside, this is
Speaker 1: a really territory, I guess you could call it. But
Speaker 1: they've already claimed Gaza as theirs. They're saying that they
Speaker 1: were hitting targets in Gaza, but they were saying it
Speaker 1: was Iran. So two things popped in my head when
Speaker 1: I heard that, Either it's not really Iran and it's
Speaker 1: just Israel cleaning up the last of the people and
Speaker 1: then going to blame a different country for doing it.
Speaker 1: To make themselves blame less or because they have you know,
Speaker 1: what do you want to call it traders infiltrators on
Speaker 1: that side that they would oop see instead of Iran
Speaker 1: is also corrupted unfortunately at the level. So that's why
Speaker 1: they're they were attempting to do regime change and all that,
Speaker 1: and they are talking about how they want to install
Speaker 1: a different leadership there because of course he works for
Speaker 1: the OAS and that's just where it goes. But so
Speaker 1: if it was a corrupt thing and they were just
Speaker 1: gonna take out Gaza for them and clean up their problem,
Speaker 1: that's another potential. Or wouldn't it be cool if they
Speaker 1: were a targeting idea taking out you know, targets in
Speaker 1: Israel just end up wiping out Gaza, and that they
Speaker 1: would do that deliberately or the other one, and this
Speaker 1: was my the one I was hoping for was wouldn't
Speaker 1: it be cool?
Speaker 7: Wouldn't it be cool.
Speaker 1: If Iran's response to the aggressions of Israel was to
Speaker 1: knock out all the IDF that was in Gaza, harming
Speaker 1: the people and then just letting it be. Given the
Speaker 1: guy this much of a chance to either fight back
Speaker 1: or flee, that would be cool, but that's me wishful thinking.
Speaker 7: I guess.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 7: I don't know if it really was Iran or if
Speaker 7: that even was a thing.
Speaker 1: You know, It's just there's stuff that I saw on
Speaker 1: the internet saying that there were that the targets in
Speaker 1: Gaza are not targets, but Gaza was one getting bombed
Speaker 1: by Israel.
Speaker 7: I'm buying Iran, and that didn't seem like it made
Speaker 7: sense to me.
Speaker 2: Of course, it's always hard for us to know since
Speaker 2: we're not there, but according to satellite images and lots
Speaker 2: of them.
Speaker 1: And now he's saying because I'm talking about one specific
Speaker 1: site of bombing, he's extrapolating it to say, well, Tel
Speaker 1: Aviv was was wrecked. Like, yeah, I didn't say they weren't.
Speaker 1: I didn't say that that wasn't the thing that the
Speaker 1: other targets weren't hit. I'm just saying wouldn't because if
Speaker 1: it was Israel, if I had at the opportunity, if
Speaker 1: I was already gonna send missiles at Israel for having
Speaker 1: struck us, then the people that they're brutalizing, I would
Speaker 1: also help with the same strike in a different area,
Speaker 1: you know, it just to help them, you know, because
Speaker 1: if you can empower them, then you have somebody working
Speaker 1: closer on the ground that can work as an ally.
Speaker 1: Just makes sense to me.
Speaker 2: Lots of reports from the area and videos from you know,
Speaker 2: fishermen that were on boats in the golf, et cetera.
Speaker 1: I've seen the pictures of the bus of the buildings
Speaker 1: in Israel. I wasn't saying that there wasn't other targets hit.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying when they said that they were hitting Gaza,
Speaker 1: that that potentially could have also happened, not that it
Speaker 1: was the only thing that happened. I think you misunderstood me, But.
Speaker 2: It looks pretty clear that Tel Aviv and other parts
Speaker 2: of Israel took a very severe beating.
Speaker 7: Yeah they did.
Speaker 1: But I think and here's the thing that Mike was
Speaker 1: saying too, and I think this is kind of strange,
Speaker 1: is that he said that they were israel Is begging
Speaker 1: Trump because where the fuck is why are we? How
Speaker 1: we involved this in this? Again? They were begging Trump
Speaker 1: for a ceasefire with Iran. You see, this is again
Speaker 1: showing that Israel is just an extension of us, because
Speaker 1: this is where the Federal Reserve is, and this is
Speaker 1: and that's what created Israel. Why why are we involved
Speaker 1: in that negotiation in the first place, that they were
Speaker 1: begging for a ceasefire because Israel is going to get
Speaker 1: wiped out? Well, why why would? Why would? Why would?
Speaker 1: Why would we be involved in that? I don't get
Speaker 1: I don't None of this fucking geopolitics makes a whole
Speaker 1: lot of sense unless you understand that it's all the
Speaker 1: same entity and Israel is the fifty first state. They
Speaker 1: also said that parts of guys that were also hit,
Speaker 1: which I.
Speaker 2: Okay, so I heard that one. But I do know
Speaker 2: that Israel begged Trump for a ceasefire because Israel was
Speaker 2: about to be destroyed. And Colonel Douglas McGregor said Israel
Speaker 2: had about one to two weeks. I think he said
Speaker 2: two weeks.
Speaker 1: Okay, So that's what they're telling the public, right, So
Speaker 1: do you feel a lot of put a lot of
Speaker 1: weight in that colonel, colonel of a military that works
Speaker 1: out in the at the behest of Israel is telling
Speaker 1: us anything should be met with skepticism.
Speaker 2: He's left at this current pace before they would be obliterated.
Speaker 1: And the here's how weird I think, because this is
Speaker 1: like I look into the history of this of this cult,
Speaker 1: and I look at the Larian Kabbala and I think
Speaker 1: of this idea the burnt offering or which is what
Speaker 1: a holocaust means, the burnt offering, since everybody is kind
Speaker 1: of getting a little suspicious of that a narrative anyway,
Speaker 1: and also because this is what it if you look
Speaker 1: at the lurriing Kabala and what the Francis we're talking
Speaker 1: about before, and they say that there's supposed to be
Speaker 1: that many people, that six million, six million, right, because
Speaker 1: there's a letter missing in a word, So they're saying
Speaker 1: that letter that that corresponds with a number is the
Speaker 1: absence of six million. And this has actually talked about
Speaker 1: either in the In Pursuit of Truth series or it's
Speaker 1: actually in Europe, but I think it's Into Pursuit of
Speaker 1: Truth series when they're going through their Cabala section. I
Speaker 1: think it's like the second video that he put out
Speaker 1: in the Ipop series or pop video, whatever the hell
Speaker 1: it was, that was where they were getting the six million.
Speaker 1: Number four in the first place was from the Kabbala
Speaker 1: and for the missing because that was a symbolic signature
Speaker 1: of you know, another stage, the final another additional stage
Speaker 1: on their progress in their cabalistic belief system. So if
Speaker 1: they did set up Israel to be a burnt offering,
Speaker 1: that would actually make sense, and that's why they would
Speaker 1: want to, you know, influx migration to there of Jews,
Speaker 1: because of course it has to be Jews that die
Speaker 1: in order for their their belief system to be fulfilled.
Speaker 1: And then also they could re establish their victimhood through
Speaker 1: that act a number, whether it's metaphoric, whether it's a lot,
Speaker 1: because the Holocaust one sure as hell is fading pretty bad.
Speaker 1: Not not not with my family, but you know, with
Speaker 1: some people. Most people hopefully are starting to see that
Speaker 1: there's a little bit more to that story, and hopefully
Speaker 1: more than that. Hopefully they're skeptical, more skeptical than just
Speaker 1: that he or whether it's part of the public ritual
Speaker 1: and they actually do it, I suppose it go. So
Speaker 1: what who's to say that the Zionists slash previously known
Speaker 1: as Francists didn't want to get a bunch of Jews
Speaker 1: in that area that aren't particularly on the upper echelon
Speaker 1: level of this cult, who aren't the bankers who are
Speaker 1: just regularly average everyday Jews who could be your best friend,
Speaker 1: and nothing's wrong with it. They're probably decentness enough people
Speaker 1: until the israeliandoctrination occurred. What if they were gathering them
Speaker 1: all together for a burnt offering? In Israel's whole plan forever,
Speaker 1: the whole idea and concept of visual was to make
Speaker 1: it a burnt offering so that they could use that
Speaker 1: as justifications to basically Samson option in the rest of
Speaker 1: the goddamn place.
Speaker 2: Well you mean so a self inflicted holocaust.
Speaker 1: Yeah, like they would if if another country, if they
Speaker 1: couldn't get another country to do it, that they would
Speaker 1: do it themselves and blame another country anyway, because I
Speaker 1: think they certainly.
Speaker 7: That would fulfill the Cabala if they did it.
Speaker 2: Wow, well, let us pray that that doesn't happen. I
Speaker 2: mean that's just almost unthinkable. But we are in some
Speaker 2: very strange times, that's for sure. Look want to say,
Speaker 2: as we put an end cap on this today, Daniel,
Speaker 2: I want to say that I call for peace. I
Speaker 2: call for peace, and I have a universal dignified love
Speaker 2: and recognition for all human beings, including Jews, including Israelis,
Speaker 2: including Palestinians, including Lebanese, including Persians, et cetera. I don't
Speaker 2: discriminate against people based on their religion or their ethnicity at.
Speaker 1: All, unless it's a religion of supremacy. Then it's hard
Speaker 1: to even say, oh, it's just a tell mudisks. Well,
Speaker 1: all these people have been, according to them, promised the
Speaker 1: end of the rest of us for their utopian world.
Speaker 1: So if they can't get it through, you know, if
Speaker 1: if they're if they're tired of waiting for God to
Speaker 1: do it on his own, well then then in steps
Speaker 1: desion is to force the hand.
Speaker 2: But I find that that's a very that's that's a
Speaker 2: tiny view. I mean, that's it's a it's a minority
Speaker 2: view in the world today, most people are either religious
Speaker 2: supremacists or racists, or they're suffering from religiously transmitted disease.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and racists in the sense I think he's going
Speaker 1: with it's okay to kill Gosins because they're Muslims or
Speaker 1: whatever they think they are, when a lot of them
Speaker 1: are actually Christians too, And that whole idea or that
Speaker 1: system of belief was again manufactured over time with all
Speaker 1: these I you know, whether they were true or not
Speaker 1: false flags of or the way they paint the story
Speaker 1: because maybe it was Muslims or something that started a fire,
Speaker 1: started a bombing, did derail the train, whatever. But would
Speaker 1: they have done that if it wasn't for Israel constantly
Speaker 1: murdering their families for seventy years. Who know, it's probably not.
Speaker 1: You know, they weren't. They weren't out for real domination.
Speaker 1: As far as I can tell, I know that there's
Speaker 1: religion and Muhammad have a lot of fucking problems. But
Speaker 1: on the other side of that, you know, of course
Speaker 1: through the media, that they control the framing of whatever happened,
Speaker 1: and the reasoning behind it is always going to be skewed.
Speaker 2: And very good, right, But to actually follow what Christ
Speaker 2: taught makes you a heretic, which is kind of fitting
Speaker 2: because Jesus Christ himself was also considered a heretic by
Speaker 2: the Jewish leaders of the time right. They called for
Speaker 2: his death repeatedly.
Speaker 1: What do you think of people who continuously say that
Speaker 1: this man from Judah was a Jew?
Speaker 2: Well, I think clearly his background involved a lot of
Speaker 2: Jewish activities, but he was he clearly diverged from the
Speaker 2: Old Testament Jewish traditions. For example, he wasn't into animal
Speaker 2: sacrifice at all, well, no.
Speaker 7: And I don't think that just because somebody geographically is
Speaker 7: something that makes them part of their color exactly.
Speaker 2: It's about your philosophy and Jesus and you know the
Speaker 2: Nazarenes and what they practice and what they taught was
Speaker 2: not animal sacrifice but baptism. It was purity through baptism
Speaker 2: through water, not blood.
Speaker 1: See. I mean that's and that came from the Goths,
Speaker 1: the idea of baptism.
Speaker 2: It's actually a really key difference. Through water came, not blood.
Speaker 1: It came from the Sun cult actually five thousand years ago.
Speaker 1: But we could talk about anybody wants to read the
Speaker 1: British edit, I highly recommend that they do that by
Speaker 1: Ella widell Well. I did a nine part series on it.
Speaker 1: But wow, if you don't want to hear my commentary
Speaker 1: on I just read the book. It's good nineteen twenty
Speaker 1: nine and came out.
Speaker 2: Let me give out your website again as we wrap
Speaker 2: this up, Semper fry Llc. That's fry Semper fry llc
Speaker 2: dot com. And Daniel, look, I know we this has
Speaker 2: been kind of a whirlwind of a conversation here. We
Speaker 2: touched on so many different topics. We didn't really go
Speaker 2: deep into any one topic.
Speaker 1: I apologize for also not being in my studio because
Speaker 1: I was there. My office is better lighting everything, but
Speaker 1: I tried.
Speaker 2: It's okay, you're on the road. No, I appreciate you
Speaker 2: taking the time to join us and look, I just
Speaker 2: but I want to I want to set the context
Speaker 2: here before we wrap this up. We are not calling
Speaker 2: for hatred or violence against any human being. We're calling
Speaker 2: for universal peace, universal dignified love.
Speaker 1: From My first friend is Jewish, but he's just not
Speaker 1: a religious supremacist jew. He just happens to consider it
Speaker 1: like an ethnicity. But he's my best friend. My daughter
Speaker 1: and his daughter play together. You know, it's it's not
Speaker 1: nobody's saying that, because there's nobody can live a real
Speaker 1: life and be like a an interact with human beings
Speaker 1: and be that much of a stereotypical like neo Nazi,
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call them. Like nobody could do
Speaker 1: that and actually follow through with it, because you're going
Speaker 1: to interact with other people if you're not an ahole yourself,
Speaker 1: You're going to interact with people that are good people,
Speaker 1: no matter what their other details are, and you're going
Speaker 1: to love and.
Speaker 7: Respect those people. Right, And so it's not about that.
Speaker 1: It's about the antagonists in any group that want to
Speaker 1: push and they want to they want to use something
Speaker 1: as a shield, like a religion, to hide behind so
Speaker 1: that they can't get scrutinized. And in the banking, in
Speaker 1: the media, it makes it a whole lot easier to
Speaker 1: not get scrutinized.
Speaker 2: And I oppose anybody who is a racist or a
Speaker 2: religious racist, regardless of their religion, whether it's Judaism, Christianity, Islam,
Speaker 2: you name it. I haven't haven't found any Buddhists that
Speaker 2: are calling for mass death. By the way, so the
Speaker 2: Buddhists seem to be pro pro piece.
Speaker 1: They are the Moon supering cult, though I have to
Speaker 1: say there's there's evidence of that, especially when Buddha basically
Speaker 1: renounced or denounced his ancestral Uh. It would actually be
Speaker 1: literally like thor at him because he defied the cult.
Speaker 1: The matriarch, the Serpent Mother literally says that is one
Speaker 1: of the doctrines.
Speaker 7: For the most part, the monks took a voice silence.
Speaker 7: They can't say anything.
Speaker 2: Right well, and so they're not calling for mass death,
Speaker 2: you know, but I I support peace and I support
Speaker 2: the idea that all all human beings are children of God,
Speaker 2: and we've got to stop killing each other, and we've
Speaker 2: got to stop thinking that one group is God's chosen
Speaker 2: people above all other people. That's that is religious racism,
Speaker 2: and that will only lead to war and suffering.
Speaker 1: And it doesn't matter if it if the Catholics pick
Speaker 1: that up next, or the Christians picked that up next,
Speaker 1: if they think that they're the supreme and they can
Speaker 1: treat everybody else like their lesson like I don't even
Speaker 1: I don't know want to say dogs because I love
Speaker 1: my dog. You know, I would never treat my dog
Speaker 1: the way they treated guys.
Speaker 7: And that's just horrific.
Speaker 2: It's horrific.
Speaker 1: You can't have anybody have a religion enough supremacy, no nobody, Nope.
Speaker 2: All right, well, thank you Daniel. It's been interesting, that's
Speaker 2: for sure. Thanks for taking the time to join us
Speaker 2: on the road. Appreciate it.
Speaker 7: Thank you, sir, Hopeful it's everything you thought it would be.
Speaker 2: I was totally unexpected. We never know what we're going
Speaker 2: to talk about exactly, but thank you for your.
Speaker 1: Time, and that's it. Then it goes into things. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: there was something messed up with that other recording that
Speaker 1: I saw it was it was out of order and
Speaker 1: there were things missing, So that was I think that
Speaker 1: was everything that we talked about. I'm surprised because I wasn't.
Speaker 1: I thought there was something wrong with it the way
Speaker 1: that they so I guess I was wrong at least
Speaker 1: in that file. That one was good Bridian. That's weird though,
Speaker 1: because all the videos I put up there lately have
Speaker 1: been choppy. Parts of my uh monologue are missing every
Speaker 1: few seconds, and I think it has something to do
Speaker 1: with the sixty frames per second. I don't think it
Speaker 1: can handle it. So it's it's only in nineteen eighty
Speaker 1: ten EIGHTP right now. When I do the gaming stuff,
Speaker 1: it's at you know, four K and sixty frames per second.
Speaker 1: But that that's a that's way more than any system
Speaker 1: usually can handle. Usually is really really rough on the
Speaker 1: replay too, sometimes until it finally fully in codes then
Speaker 1: it's fine. But uh yeah, so five I think they
Speaker 1: use five forty or something like that on bridy on,
Speaker 1: so if I met, they must only be a lot
Speaker 1: of thirty frames per second, and so I have to
Speaker 1: learn if I want to be on BRIDI and I
Speaker 1: have to scale down I did a lot of yapping today.
Speaker 1: I'm tired as how. It's three hours and twenty three
Speaker 1: minutes into it. Yeah, I live it a be I
Speaker 1: how long ago were these you guys are having a
Speaker 1: nice conversation. Looks like I leave it to the moon.
Speaker 1: You know where things are, right? I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: go through that every time to remember you just said
Speaker 1: this one. All right? So here take a look. This
Speaker 1: is the description. You can tell I'm tired. I still
Speaker 1: forget the elliptical. Sorry, I forget. Have some midnight simper
Speaker 1: frylc dot com. You click it, teta do there it
Speaker 1: is doctor Glyndon. Click that to become a member, find
Speaker 1: a site and they can use that for fifty percent
Speaker 1: off this one. Guys use the code Bravo Bravo five
Speaker 1: BB five I discussed in the last video. Even the
Speaker 1: three things that are around there are actually all good.
Speaker 1: The IP six, the core copper, and the coy liver oil.
Speaker 1: If you want something for your ninety es centrals that
Speaker 1: is less of a hit to the pocket than the
Speaker 1: tangy tangerine, get the whole food vitamin from doctor Monzo.
Speaker 1: It's fifty percent less of a hit. It's thirty nine
Speaker 1: before you use the discount code versus eighty two of
Speaker 1: the tangy tangerine. I mean, you could probably call Eifelhealth
Speaker 1: dot com. There's a number on there. You might be
Speaker 1: able to get a different quote than what's on the website.
Speaker 1: But if you just ort to reaff the website, tangy
Speaker 1: tangerine alone is that's only a thirty day supply. So
Speaker 1: if you get the whole food vitamin from Azure, well
Speaker 1: then it's half that price and it gets you the
Speaker 1: same that's going to fulfill the same thing that the
Speaker 1: tanker tangerine does. And then cod liver oil would supplement
Speaker 1: the UFAs. And then I say you should always take
Speaker 1: the plant drive minerals and the osteo effects from Eiffelhealth,
Speaker 1: and then add the core copper over here, and maybe
Speaker 1: the IP six or the whole food vitamin C is
Speaker 1: also over here too. Okay, full a chemic acid, I
Speaker 1: like doctor Bonnzo has had that before we even became
Speaker 1: a natural product, and it's good stuff. So if you
Speaker 1: look over here, that's the full a chemic acid right there,
Speaker 1: and one of those jars last about ninety days or more.
Speaker 1: You don't take it a whole lot. It should have
Speaker 1: come a little, tiny, tiny spooning, but I don't know
Speaker 1: if it does anymore. All Right, have a good night.
Speaker 1: Thanks for hanging out. And I know that was like
Speaker 1: the probably the worst interview I've ever done, so I
Speaker 1: appreciate you humoring me. Put something nice on there so
Speaker 1: I don't get like eaten by by Piranhas. Go to
Speaker 1: his his rumble video and drop drop something kind if
Speaker 1: you if you don't mind, I'm sure it's gonna get
Speaker 1: an avalanche of hate. So thank you. Have a good day.