WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>There's an interesting piece in cal Matters talking about housing

2
00:00:03.960 --> 00:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and California housing and specifically how the Trump administration could

3
00:00:09.480 --> 00:00:15.599
<v Speaker 1>make housing more or less difficult to build in the

4
00:00:15.599 --> 00:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>state of California. Now, it would seem hard to imagine

5
00:00:21.039 --> 00:00:25.039
<v Speaker 1>a scenario how the Trump administration could make it more difficult,

6
00:00:25.120 --> 00:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>given that it's already happening at an unbelievable snail's pace.

7
00:00:31.039 --> 00:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually read a stat that the Dallas area of

8
00:00:34.039 --> 00:00:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Texas alone, which I assume is Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington,

9
00:00:41.039 --> 00:00:43.439
<v Speaker 1>which is a big population but not as big as

10
00:00:43.719 --> 00:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>all of California, the Dallas area of Texas alone is

11
00:00:48.520 --> 00:00:51.719
<v Speaker 1>building more houses per year than California is than the

12
00:00:51.759 --> 00:00:54.359
<v Speaker 1>whole state of California is.

13
00:00:54.679 --> 00:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>It's just insane.

14
00:00:59.320 --> 00:01:02.119
<v Speaker 1>And we've had this continuous problem in California that we're

15
00:01:02.159 --> 00:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not building enough to meet demand. And that simple math

16
00:01:06.719 --> 00:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in economics that when you have high demand and low supply,

17
00:01:10.040 --> 00:01:13.079
<v Speaker 1>that leads to high high, high, high high prices and

18
00:01:13.159 --> 00:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's unsustainable. It's what drove the idea for the stupid

19
00:01:19.120 --> 00:01:22.439
<v Speaker 1>high speed rail train, the idea of basically that basically

20
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the chief benefit of the high speed rail train would

21
00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:29.079
<v Speaker 1>have been for Bay Area workers. That they could live

22
00:01:29.159 --> 00:01:32.879
<v Speaker 1>further and further and further away from San Francisco or

23
00:01:33.000 --> 00:01:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, live further and further and further south, and

24
00:01:37.319 --> 00:01:39.799
<v Speaker 1>then just zip up, you know, twice a week or

25
00:01:39.799 --> 00:01:45.599
<v Speaker 1>something on the train, get your mansion in Madera, and

26
00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:49.079
<v Speaker 1>commute up to San Jose for your work maybe once

27
00:01:49.120 --> 00:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a week or something. Now here's the main problem in

28
00:01:57.599 --> 00:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>California is that we impose all kinds of building regulations

29
00:02:02.079 --> 00:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that make it really difficult and environmental regulations that make

30
00:02:06.239 --> 00:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it really difficult for builders to invest the money needed

31
00:02:10.319 --> 00:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to build homes. That's the first, last, and middle problem.

32
00:02:18.240 --> 00:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>As much as we have these debates in California about

33
00:02:22.159 --> 00:02:28.159
<v Speaker 1>not in my backyard ism, nimbiism, you know, wealthy liberal

34
00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>enclaves of.

35
00:02:29.599 --> 00:02:32.319
<v Speaker 2>California that refuse to have you know, a.

36
00:02:32.319 --> 00:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Multi unit dwelling built in their city and block it

37
00:02:35.400 --> 00:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>through municipal action, you know, at the level of the

38
00:02:38.159 --> 00:02:40.759
<v Speaker 1>city council or the city Planning Commission, whatever.

39
00:02:41.319 --> 00:02:44.479
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like, though that stuff is.

40
00:02:45.919 --> 00:02:47.879
<v Speaker 1>That is talked about a lot as if that's some

41
00:02:47.960 --> 00:02:51.719
<v Speaker 1>big problem, but that attitude exists all over the United

42
00:02:51.759 --> 00:02:57.319
<v Speaker 1>States of America. Those attitudes can exist, those mechanisms for

43
00:02:57.360 --> 00:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to blockhousing can exist in city councils all up

44
00:03:01.000 --> 00:03:04.039
<v Speaker 1>and down this country, and other parts of the country

45
00:03:04.039 --> 00:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have the problem with housing that we have. Why Well,

46
00:03:07.960 --> 00:03:11.159
<v Speaker 1>because other states don't have the environmental regulation that we have.

47
00:03:11.199 --> 00:03:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Other states don't have the kinds of environmental laws that

48
00:03:13.960 --> 00:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>make it so easy to block new construction. Probably the

49
00:03:21.159 --> 00:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>most sort of consequential of these is SEQUA, the California

50
00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Environmental Quality Act. So with SEQUA, there's all kinds of

51
00:03:30.840 --> 00:03:38.319
<v Speaker 1>insane things that does. Every new project requires a kind

52
00:03:38.360 --> 00:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of a massive sort of environmental impact report that's very

53
00:03:41.360 --> 00:03:45.319
<v Speaker 1>onerous to put together, very expensive to put together. You'll

54
00:03:45.360 --> 00:03:47.439
<v Speaker 1>have a situation like what's happening right now, where the

55
00:03:47.439 --> 00:03:51.719
<v Speaker 1>City of Fresno put together a massive citywide environmental impact

56
00:03:51.800 --> 00:03:56.759
<v Speaker 1>report to sort of help facilitate people investing in Fresno

57
00:03:56.879 --> 00:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to build stuff in Fresno, businesses building. So the city

58
00:04:02.000 --> 00:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of Fresno basically tried to do much of the work

59
00:04:04.199 --> 00:04:10.319
<v Speaker 1>for these developers, and then the developers their environmental impact

60
00:04:10.319 --> 00:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>report would just have to be this smaller thing. Well

61
00:04:12.599 --> 00:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>guess what happened though, And this is another lovely part

62
00:04:17.600 --> 00:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of SEQUA is that anyone can sue you for allegedly

63
00:04:23.279 --> 00:04:27.439
<v Speaker 1>not fully complying with sequa's terms. Anyone can sue you.

64
00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be someone who's directly harmed by

65
00:04:31.360 --> 00:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the environmental impact of your construction project or something. That's

66
00:04:35.959 --> 00:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that most American litigation happens. Most lawsuits in America,

67
00:04:42.720 --> 00:04:47.519
<v Speaker 1>you have to somehow be harmed before you can sue somebody.

68
00:04:47.680 --> 00:04:51.439
<v Speaker 1>You have to be the one who is harmed before

69
00:04:51.480 --> 00:04:54.519
<v Speaker 1>you have what's called standing to sue.

70
00:04:54.560 --> 00:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Standing is a.

71
00:04:55.600 --> 00:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Sort of essential bedrock of American law, bedrock principle, bed

72
00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>rock limiting principle. Then not anybody can sue anybody for anything.

73
00:05:03.879 --> 00:05:10.639
<v Speaker 1>If someone crashes their car into my friend Jonathan Keller's house,

74
00:05:11.560 --> 00:05:14.759
<v Speaker 1>well Jonathan can sue the guy for negligence, for property

75
00:05:14.839 --> 00:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>damage whatever. I can't sue the guy though. I can't

76
00:05:18.519 --> 00:05:20.319
<v Speaker 1>come into the court and say I'm suing this man

77
00:05:20.360 --> 00:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for crashing his car into Jonathan Keller's house, and the

78
00:05:23.000 --> 00:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>judge will look at me and say, well, why are

79
00:05:25.399 --> 00:05:28.759
<v Speaker 1>you here, Why are you suing so well, I'm really

80
00:05:28.839 --> 00:05:31.879
<v Speaker 1>upset your honor. Yeah, well that's not enough to provide

81
00:05:31.879 --> 00:05:36.439
<v Speaker 1>you with standing. You have to suffer some harm. You

82
00:05:36.639 --> 00:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>have to have some showable damages, something that has happened

83
00:05:43.319 --> 00:05:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to you, some infringement of your rights, some economic harm,

84
00:05:46.480 --> 00:05:52.199
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, before you can sue. SEQUA kind of

85
00:05:52.360 --> 00:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is a massive exception to that basic normal principle of

86
00:05:57.160 --> 00:06:01.639
<v Speaker 1>American law with SEQUA, I guess because they sort of figure, well,

87
00:06:01.759 --> 00:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>environmental harms are so diffuse that basically, who is the

88
00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>one person harmed by a bad environment? Does anyone who

89
00:06:09.639 --> 00:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>has asthma.

90
00:06:10.839 --> 00:06:11.439
<v Speaker 2>Able to sue?

91
00:06:11.480 --> 00:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, not necessarily, So basically what they do is go

92
00:06:14.959 --> 00:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to the opposite extreme and just say everyone can sue.

93
00:06:17.759 --> 00:06:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Anyone can sue anybody, any real estate developer, any builder,

94
00:06:26.000 --> 00:06:27.879
<v Speaker 1>And in the case of the City of Fresno, a

95
00:06:27.920 --> 00:06:30.879
<v Speaker 1>city putting together an environmental impact report, a city wide

96
00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>environmental impact report can be sued by literally anyone for

97
00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>violating the terms of SEQUA. And that's precisely what happened

98
00:06:40.199 --> 00:06:42.319
<v Speaker 1>with the City of Fresno. The City of Fresno got

99
00:06:42.399 --> 00:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>sued for its citywide environmental Impact Report, which was the

100
00:06:46.279 --> 00:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>basis off of which all these other developers all over

101
00:06:49.959 --> 00:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the city were building projects. Some left wing nonprofit groups

102
00:06:57.439 --> 00:07:00.199
<v Speaker 1>sues the City of Fresno over its environmental impact report,

103
00:07:01.560 --> 00:07:03.959
<v Speaker 1>a judge agrees with them, and guess what. Now, We've

104
00:07:03.959 --> 00:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>got like twelve different construction, housing, etc. Projects all stalled

105
00:07:12.040 --> 00:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>because of some RinkyDink nonprofit organization that wins a lawsuit.

106
00:07:19.519 --> 00:07:29.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's that threat that I think hinders housing construction businesses,

107
00:07:29.680 --> 00:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>businesses that want to build things from building. Why would

108
00:07:34.360 --> 00:07:37.399
<v Speaker 1>you start a massive housing project if you have no

109
00:07:37.560 --> 00:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>idea that in the middle of it, litigation might fly

110
00:07:40.879 --> 00:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in on some spurious grounds to say that no, no, no,

111
00:07:43.839 --> 00:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the environmental impact report is insufficient. That this environmental heart

112
00:07:48.560 --> 00:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and the lawsuit could come from anybody. It could come

113
00:07:51.839 --> 00:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>from a competing developer. It could come from Joe Bleep,

114
00:07:57.279 --> 00:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Ragman, as my dad used to say. It could

115
00:07:59.600 --> 00:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>come from some environmental Waco group. It could come from

116
00:08:04.639 --> 00:08:05.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe it could come.

117
00:08:05.519 --> 00:08:06.839
<v Speaker 2>From a NIMBI impulse.

118
00:08:06.879 --> 00:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>You want to build a multi dwelling unit, some apartments

119
00:08:12.879 --> 00:08:16.079
<v Speaker 1>and homeowners in the neighborhood think that that's going to

120
00:08:16.079 --> 00:08:18.879
<v Speaker 1>reduce their property values, so they sue you for the

121
00:08:18.879 --> 00:08:21.839
<v Speaker 1>alleged environmental impact of what you're doing, when really they

122
00:08:21.879 --> 00:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>don't give a darn about the environmental impact. What they

123
00:08:24.040 --> 00:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>care about is the fact that they think it's going

124
00:08:26.120 --> 00:08:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to reduce their property values.

125
00:08:33.320 --> 00:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>So the result of this.

126
00:08:37.639 --> 00:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Furthermore is that what kind of housing can California builders build. Well,

127
00:08:46.039 --> 00:08:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the only things they can really build is very hot.

128
00:08:51.440 --> 00:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Now this isn't true universally, but broad strokes and we

129
00:08:56.480 --> 00:08:58.279
<v Speaker 1>do see this in Fresno. A lot of the construction

130
00:08:58.360 --> 00:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that's happening in Fresno is one of two things. It's

131
00:09:03.399 --> 00:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>either very high end or very low end. It's either

132
00:09:08.519 --> 00:09:13.799
<v Speaker 1>very high end apartments in Clovis and that are very

133
00:09:13.840 --> 00:09:17.799
<v Speaker 1>far north where they can charge very high rents, or

134
00:09:18.519 --> 00:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's registered trademark California lower income housing registered trademark. Now,

135
00:09:26.639 --> 00:09:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that registered trademark California lower income housing

136
00:09:30.720 --> 00:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>has to meet all these kinds of environmental requirements, etc.

137
00:09:33.320 --> 00:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Such that it's more expensive to build than the normal

138
00:09:37.399 --> 00:09:39.159
<v Speaker 1>housing that people in most of the states of the

139
00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>United States live in. It's very expensive to build quote

140
00:09:43.720 --> 00:09:48.639
<v Speaker 1>lower income community housing. You've had stories of these apartment

141
00:09:48.720 --> 00:09:52.519
<v Speaker 1>complexes being built as quote lower income housing in California

142
00:09:52.559 --> 00:09:55.399
<v Speaker 1>where each unit costs like five hundred thousand dollars. I

143
00:09:55.399 --> 00:09:57.159
<v Speaker 1>think about a story where each unit costs like a

144
00:09:57.240 --> 00:10:03.759
<v Speaker 1>million dollars to build and the only reason builders can

145
00:10:03.799 --> 00:10:07.759
<v Speaker 1>build it is because the state is dumping out subsidies

146
00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to allow it to be profitable for the builders. So

147
00:10:13.639 --> 00:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the only ways you can make money is if you

148
00:10:15.720 --> 00:10:19.519
<v Speaker 1>build quote, lower income housing and you get a state subsidy,

149
00:10:20.960 --> 00:10:25.519
<v Speaker 1>or you build really high end stuff for high wealthy

150
00:10:25.600 --> 00:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>people where you know that you can charge very high rents,

151
00:10:30.519 --> 00:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>or self for very high Guess where that leaves the

152
00:10:33.600 --> 00:10:34.799
<v Speaker 1>middle class.

153
00:10:36.120 --> 00:10:43.600
<v Speaker 2>With jack You know what? So how would a Trump

154
00:10:43.600 --> 00:10:48.320
<v Speaker 2>administration impact this? Well?

155
00:10:48.480 --> 00:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>The article from cal Matters focuses a lot on immigration,

156
00:10:52.879 --> 00:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and it keeps saying, well, if President Trump deports all

157
00:10:56.120 --> 00:10:58.519
<v Speaker 1>the illegal aliens, then who will be around to build

158
00:10:58.919 --> 00:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>o offend, which strikes me as naive. We already went

159
00:11:07.559 --> 00:11:12.039
<v Speaker 1>through a Trump administration once there wasn't a lack of

160
00:11:12.120 --> 00:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>workers able to build housing. The idea that the unsustainably

161
00:11:18.519 --> 00:11:22.919
<v Speaker 1>high levels of illegal immigration that the Biden administration allowed

162
00:11:23.279 --> 00:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to flow into this country that we couldn't have both

163
00:11:26.960 --> 00:11:32.639
<v Speaker 1>one massive deportations and two enough workers to do construction, I.

164
00:11:33.080 --> 00:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Think is incredibly naive and a silly talking point.

165
00:11:40.399 --> 00:11:43.159
<v Speaker 1>One of the main people quoted in this piece is

166
00:11:43.200 --> 00:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the worst people in all of

167
00:11:45.399 --> 00:11:51.799
<v Speaker 1>American politics, and certainly in California politics. Scott Wiener, it

168
00:11:51.919 --> 00:11:55.039
<v Speaker 1>was a California state senator who represents sort of Nancy

169
00:11:55.080 --> 00:11:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi's stomping grounds right in the heart of San Francisco.

170
00:11:57.840 --> 00:11:59.799
<v Speaker 1>This is the kind of guy who actually marked he's

171
00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:02.639
<v Speaker 1>a state senator. He marches in gay pride parades wearing

172
00:12:02.759 --> 00:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>leather stuff.

173
00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:05.759
<v Speaker 2>Just leave it at that.

174
00:12:06.519 --> 00:12:09.159
<v Speaker 1>This is the guy who's introduced all kinds of horrible

175
00:12:09.960 --> 00:12:15.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, horrible stuff with transgenderism, about if

176
00:12:15.159 --> 00:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a kid comes from out of state to California wanting

177
00:12:18.960 --> 00:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to transition, the parents don't can we transition the kid

178
00:12:22.720 --> 00:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>without the parents approval? Like he's that level, Like he's maybe,

179
00:12:27.559 --> 00:12:30.639
<v Speaker 1>as I say, one of the worst people in all

180
00:12:30.679 --> 00:12:33.759
<v Speaker 1>of American politics. Like there were some rumblings that he

181
00:12:33.840 --> 00:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to run for Nancy Pelosi that there still are,

182
00:12:36.240 --> 00:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I think rumblings that he's going to run for Nancy

183
00:12:38.039 --> 00:12:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi's House of Representatives district once she retires. The rumblings

184
00:12:44.960 --> 00:12:49.919
<v Speaker 1>are between Christine Pelosi, Nancy's daughter, and him, and I

185
00:12:50.000 --> 00:12:53.879
<v Speaker 1>hate him so much I would campaign for Christine Pelosi

186
00:12:54.200 --> 00:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that he doesn't get that seat. Like

187
00:12:57.639 --> 00:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost serious. I don't know that i'd actually campaign

188
00:13:01.399 --> 00:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>for a Pelosi, but oh my gosh, he is the worst.

189
00:13:10.600 --> 00:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So Wiener raises the concerns that President Electrump could deport

190
00:13:18.320 --> 00:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>enough people that it would increase the cause of housing,

191
00:13:22.360 --> 00:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and that tariffs could increased costs with regard to housing.

192
00:13:26.720 --> 00:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe tariffs, what I mean that might be fair? I

193
00:13:31.000 --> 00:13:34.399
<v Speaker 1>mean that there are trade offs with tariffs, but they're

194
00:13:34.480 --> 00:13:37.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, it could have the impact of making certain

195
00:13:37.120 --> 00:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of products that are used in construction more expensive.

196
00:13:40.120 --> 00:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It's rich, though, hearing any Democrat in California complain about

197
00:13:47.440 --> 00:13:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Republican policies and how Republican policies might make housing more

198
00:13:50.639 --> 00:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>expensive when they all know the score. Everything I said

199
00:13:55.399 --> 00:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>in the first ten minutes of this show about why

200
00:13:57.720 --> 00:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>housing is expensive in California, how environmental regulation makes housing

201
00:14:01.120 --> 00:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>more expensive, everyone in our state legislature knows it. Everyone

202
00:14:07.960 --> 00:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in our state legislature understands the negative impacts of SEQUA,

203
00:14:12.759 --> 00:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Everyone in our state legislature understands the negative impacts of

204
00:14:15.399 --> 00:14:20.519
<v Speaker 1>lots of other kinds of specifically California regulation that makes

205
00:14:20.679 --> 00:14:26.679
<v Speaker 1>housing more expensive. They know what the problem is. Honestly,

206
00:14:26.759 --> 00:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very similar to the right. I mean, like, you know,

207
00:14:29.000 --> 00:14:31.799
<v Speaker 1>there are people on the right who complain about, you know,

208
00:14:31.879 --> 00:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the federal budget being out of balance and spending is

209
00:14:35.080 --> 00:14:37.559
<v Speaker 1>too much. Well, the reason why spending is too much

210
00:14:37.679 --> 00:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is because of Medicare, Medicaid, and the military.

211
00:14:40.919 --> 00:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Those are the main things.

212
00:14:42.840 --> 00:14:47.039
<v Speaker 1>If you aren't going to cut those things, you're really

213
00:14:47.200 --> 00:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>never going to balance the budget. And nobody wants to

214
00:14:50.000 --> 00:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>cut those things. Certainly nobody on the right does anymore.

215
00:14:53.440 --> 00:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to cut the military, they don't want

216
00:14:55.000 --> 00:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to cut Medicare, they don't want to cut Medicaid, they

217
00:14:57.240 --> 00:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to cut Social Security. This is a Republican

218
00:15:01.799 --> 00:15:05.639
<v Speaker 1>This sort of willful blindness to the problem is not

219
00:15:05.799 --> 00:15:07.519
<v Speaker 1>exclusively a left going phenomenon.

220
00:15:07.559 --> 00:15:08.519
<v Speaker 2>It exists on the right too.

221
00:15:08.759 --> 00:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>But in California, everyone understands why housing is expensive, and

222
00:15:13.879 --> 00:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they just don't want to do anything to stop it.

223
00:15:16.120 --> 00:15:18.759
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to do anything to change it. And

224
00:15:18.799 --> 00:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's what I don't understand about some of these,

225
00:15:21.000 --> 00:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>like Harvard Howard Jarvis texts fighters Association types. If they've

226
00:15:27.519 --> 00:15:33.039
<v Speaker 1>got the money for ballad initiative fights, which seemingly they do,

227
00:15:34.000 --> 00:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>why don't they just introduce ballid initiatives to try to

228
00:15:39.840 --> 00:15:46.519
<v Speaker 1>abolish or reform sequa why not it strikes me, or

229
00:15:46.600 --> 00:15:49.799
<v Speaker 1>to reform the California Resources Board, to do all kinds

230
00:15:49.840 --> 00:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of things. It just strikes me as bizarre that we've

231
00:15:55.080 --> 00:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>got this direct democracy system in California and people on

232
00:15:58.639 --> 00:16:03.679
<v Speaker 1>the right have been so inept at utilizing it to

233
00:16:03.720 --> 00:16:06.799
<v Speaker 1>fix problems. When we return, how I wonder if this

234
00:16:06.840 --> 00:16:11.879
<v Speaker 1>is an untapped resource, the ballot initiative system, if this

235
00:16:11.919 --> 00:16:15.519
<v Speaker 1>is a totally untapped resources for the right in California.

236
00:16:15.559 --> 00:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Next on the John Growardy Show, going through this piece

237
00:16:20.120 --> 00:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>from Calmatters dot org about whether or not it's written

238
00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>by Felicia Mellow discussing the idea of whether or not

239
00:16:30.000 --> 00:16:35.279
<v Speaker 1>a Trump administration could ease the problems with housing in California.

240
00:16:35.360 --> 00:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>We come against this problem. I don't know how much

241
00:16:38.879 --> 00:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration could really do. Certainly there's federal regulation

242
00:16:48.200 --> 00:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that Trump could cut. There are other things Trump could

243
00:16:52.240 --> 00:16:57.559
<v Speaker 1>do that could influence the cost of housing in some cases,

244
00:16:57.559 --> 00:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps negatively, like tariffs. Tariffs could I mean, I'm open

245
00:17:03.519 --> 00:17:06.039
<v Speaker 1>to the argument that tariffs over the long run could

246
00:17:06.079 --> 00:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>be a good thing for the economy and could be

247
00:17:07.920 --> 00:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>beneficial for American industry in lots of ways. It would

248
00:17:11.119 --> 00:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>probably though, make certain kinds of products used in home

249
00:17:15.160 --> 00:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>construction more expensive. Maybe you say that's worth it given

250
00:17:19.920 --> 00:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the trade offs in other ways. But that is a

251
00:17:23.039 --> 00:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>real possibility. But the real problem I see is how

252
00:17:31.960 --> 00:17:34.799
<v Speaker 1>do you get you know, how do you bring this

253
00:17:34.839 --> 00:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>horse to water? You can bring the horse to water,

254
00:17:37.200 --> 00:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't make them drink. How does Trump make the

255
00:17:40.240 --> 00:17:44.839
<v Speaker 1>horse of California drink? I mean, Trump can do anything

256
00:17:44.839 --> 00:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you want at the federal level. It doesn't make state

257
00:17:47.559 --> 00:17:51.079
<v Speaker 1>laws go away in California, doesn't make state regulators in

258
00:17:51.119 --> 00:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>California go away. It doesn't make state regulation go away.

259
00:17:57.440 --> 00:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make the California Air Resources Board go away,

260
00:18:00.440 --> 00:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>which is passed sort of on its own, various kinds

261
00:18:03.200 --> 00:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of environmental regulations that are harmful.

262
00:18:05.079 --> 00:18:13.599
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't make things like what other things. It doesn't

263
00:18:13.640 --> 00:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>make sequa go away.

264
00:18:16.279 --> 00:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump can do all that stuff he wants, but that's

265
00:18:19.480 --> 00:18:20.319
<v Speaker 1>never going away.

266
00:18:22.599 --> 00:18:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

267
00:18:23.279 --> 00:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I think there are possibilities at the federal level that

268
00:18:27.200 --> 00:18:32.079
<v Speaker 1>Trump could and especially since housing as a major problem

269
00:18:33.000 --> 00:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to be much more of a focus of the

270
00:18:35.640 --> 00:18:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump forty seven administration than it was the trump forty

271
00:18:38.319 --> 00:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>five administration. Vice President elect Vance talked about it a

272
00:18:42.440 --> 00:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>lot on the campaign trail. I think there's a lot

273
00:18:47.279 --> 00:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to it. I think there's a lot more focus on

274
00:18:52.920 --> 00:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>this issue than there was before. I'd be interested to

275
00:18:56.440 --> 00:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>see who the new head of Housing and Urban Development

276
00:18:59.680 --> 00:19:00.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to be.

277
00:19:01.599 --> 00:19:02.279
<v Speaker 2>I hope it's not.

278
00:19:02.480 --> 00:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>What often tends to happen is that basically administrations dump

279
00:19:07.039 --> 00:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody to be the Secretary for Housing in Urban Development too.

280
00:19:10.839 --> 00:19:12.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's sort of a political ally.

281
00:19:12.440 --> 00:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>They sort of want a reward, but you know, they're

282
00:19:14.440 --> 00:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>not sure what to do with him, so they make

283
00:19:16.319 --> 00:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>him the head of HUT. That's what they did with

284
00:19:18.839 --> 00:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Ben Carson, which didn't make much sense to me. So

285
00:19:26.599 --> 00:19:32.079
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll have to see. But I guess the

286
00:19:32.240 --> 00:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>problem is that there is a bunch of California law

287
00:19:37.119 --> 00:19:40.519
<v Speaker 1>that Trump still has in his way that that's not

288
00:19:40.640 --> 00:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>going to change now when we return, I want to

289
00:19:45.400 --> 00:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>focus on the California ballid initiative system.

290
00:19:48.680 --> 00:19:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to save this for the.

291
00:19:49.680 --> 00:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Third segment so I have more time the California ballid

292
00:19:52.440 --> 00:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>initiative system, how I think it's underutilized, and how there's

293
00:19:57.400 --> 00:20:01.759
<v Speaker 1>one person who started to be come involved in American politics,

294
00:20:02.359 --> 00:20:05.079
<v Speaker 1>who could maybe do something really impressive with it. That's

295
00:20:05.119 --> 00:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>next on the John Girardi Show.

296
00:20:09.200 --> 00:20:09.799
<v Speaker 2>I think the.

297
00:20:09.680 --> 00:20:16.039
<v Speaker 1>California ballot initiative system is massively underutilized by the right,

298
00:20:17.359 --> 00:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think this most recent election cycle has showed

299
00:20:21.279 --> 00:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>us that there is an avenue there for pursuing conservative events.

300
00:20:26.039 --> 00:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So let me let me go through a little bit

301
00:20:29.480 --> 00:20:33.599
<v Speaker 1>some of the election results from the ballot initiatives this

302
00:20:33.640 --> 00:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>past election cycle in twenty twenty four. It may be

303
00:20:39.240 --> 00:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing a right word shift nationally and maybe

304
00:20:44.240 --> 00:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>even a little bit in California. Every state in the

305
00:20:47.240 --> 00:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Union seemingly went a little bit right, even states that

306
00:20:52.400 --> 00:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Harris won went right of where they were in twenty twenty.

307
00:20:58.720 --> 00:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that there was one point during the evening

308
00:21:02.200 --> 00:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>on election night.

309
00:21:03.000 --> 00:21:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I remember the CNN where they had oh, what is

310
00:21:06.319 --> 00:21:07.039
<v Speaker 2>that guy's name?

311
00:21:07.279 --> 00:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>He was talking with Jake Tapper, one of their election

312
00:21:09.839 --> 00:21:12.839
<v Speaker 1>analyst dudes, and he was showing, these are all of

313
00:21:12.880 --> 00:21:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the counties throughout the entire United States of America that

314
00:21:16.680 --> 00:21:21.079
<v Speaker 1>we've tracked that Kamala Harris has outperformed Joe Biden from

315
00:21:21.079 --> 00:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty And then they showed it, and there was

316
00:21:24.000 --> 00:21:26.799
<v Speaker 1>not one county in the entire United States highlighted on

317
00:21:26.839 --> 00:21:29.519
<v Speaker 1>the map at the time. Jake Tapper's standing there incredules

318
00:21:29.519 --> 00:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>what not even one. Now, eventually, I think over time,

319
00:21:34.279 --> 00:21:37.519
<v Speaker 1>as we've counted all the votes, there were a few counties,

320
00:21:37.559 --> 00:21:39.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe like three or four, that that Harris did in

321
00:21:39.759 --> 00:21:47.279
<v Speaker 1>fact outperform Joe Biden. But the matter stands, Republicans did

322
00:21:47.400 --> 00:21:50.319
<v Speaker 1>much better, Democrats did much worse. There's a right word

323
00:21:50.359 --> 00:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>shift in the country, and you could even see that

324
00:21:54.759 --> 00:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in California. California, Republicans actually did decently well in some

325
00:21:58.000 --> 00:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>of the House raises, and I think actually picked up

326
00:22:03.279 --> 00:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one or two competitive seats in the state legislature. And

327
00:22:08.319 --> 00:22:13.759
<v Speaker 1>most of all, I think the ballot initiative outcomes were surprising,

328
00:22:14.039 --> 00:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly good for Republicans. A lot of things that Republicans

329
00:22:22.119 --> 00:22:25.799
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see blocked were blocked. Rent control was blocked,

330
00:22:25.839 --> 00:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a minimum wage increase was blocked. Now, some liberal priorities

331
00:22:34.920 --> 00:22:39.839
<v Speaker 1>did get passed. The stupid ten billion dollars statewide education

332
00:22:40.000 --> 00:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>bond passed. It's all right, we'll spend ten billion dollars

333
00:22:42.279 --> 00:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in education stuff that we'll have to pay for down

334
00:22:44.920 --> 00:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the road with twenty billion dollars, because a bond is

335
00:22:47.279 --> 00:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a loan to a governmental entity that you have to

336
00:22:49.160 --> 00:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>pay back with interest, and the interest will basically be

337
00:22:51.759 --> 00:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>more or less double the principle. So you know, ten

338
00:22:56.519 --> 00:23:01.039
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar bond for education. Why because the teachers' unions

339
00:23:01.039 --> 00:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>were mad that there wasn't enough in the state budget.

340
00:23:02.720 --> 00:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, There's never going to be enough in the

341
00:23:04.440 --> 00:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>state budget for the teachers.

342
00:23:07.240 --> 00:23:08.599
<v Speaker 2>This is the norm.

343
00:23:09.200 --> 00:23:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Our spending habits outstripped the revenue we were going to

344
00:23:13.160 --> 00:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>take in. A bunch of revenue left this state during COVID.

345
00:23:18.400 --> 00:23:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Bunch of wealthy people left and took their capital gains taxes,

346
00:23:21.599 --> 00:23:24.599
<v Speaker 1>took their income taxes with them, and they're not coming back.

347
00:23:26.240 --> 00:23:29.799
<v Speaker 1>So are we just every year the state budget won't

348
00:23:29.799 --> 00:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>be enough for education and we'll just do another bond measure.

349
00:23:32.440 --> 00:23:34.039
<v Speaker 1>We'll just put ourselves more and more and more in

350
00:23:34.119 --> 00:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>debt for the rest of time. All right, sounds like

351
00:23:37.000 --> 00:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what's going to happen. So Proposition two passed. Proposition fours,

352
00:23:40.519 --> 00:23:43.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe even more egregiously stupid, ten billion dollars for various

353
00:23:43.599 --> 00:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>environmental projects of that past. So I'm not saying all

354
00:23:46.200 --> 00:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the ballot initiative results were great for Republicans, but the

355
00:23:50.359 --> 00:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>signal achievement of the right in the ballot initiative space

356
00:23:57.000 --> 00:24:01.599
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four was Proposition thirty six. This was

357
00:24:02.079 --> 00:24:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the ballot initiative to classify certain kinds of crimes as

358
00:24:07.920 --> 00:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>felonies rather than misdemeanors. These were things that historically were

359
00:24:12.200 --> 00:24:15.039
<v Speaker 1>felonies and then ten years ago Prop. Forty seven, Prop

360
00:24:15.119 --> 00:24:18.799
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven made them into misdemeanors. And guess what if

361
00:24:18.839 --> 00:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a misdemeanor rather than a felony, that's a big

362
00:24:21.000 --> 00:24:24.279
<v Speaker 1>disincentive to charge it at the level of your district attorney.

363
00:24:27.240 --> 00:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And so you had people getting away with all kinds

364
00:24:30.000 --> 00:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>of drug crimes, all kinds of robbery crimes. So Prop

365
00:24:33.160 --> 00:24:36.759
<v Speaker 1>thirty six was this targeted thing to classify certain kinds

366
00:24:36.759 --> 00:24:40.599
<v Speaker 1>of crimes as felonies rather than misdemeanors and restore some

367
00:24:40.759 --> 00:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>semblance of wanting to actually prosecute people for crime into

368
00:24:46.039 --> 00:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the California criminal justice system.

369
00:24:50.119 --> 00:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>On a local level, we also saw.

370
00:24:52.160 --> 00:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>That this mood was impacting the state as Los Angeles

371
00:24:55.400 --> 00:24:59.079
<v Speaker 1>County kicked out George Gascon, their ultra left wing prosecutor.

372
00:25:00.880 --> 00:25:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Now I thought that was an impressive outcome. To actually

373
00:25:08.359 --> 00:25:17.039
<v Speaker 1>affirmatively pass a conservative ballot initiative was amazing, and Prop

374
00:25:17.079 --> 00:25:23.599
<v Speaker 1>thirty six passed easily seventy two percent. It won every

375
00:25:23.640 --> 00:25:26.799
<v Speaker 1>single county of California. There was not one county where

376
00:25:26.839 --> 00:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the nos outweighed the yeses easy, And it got me

377
00:25:36.000 --> 00:25:45.039
<v Speaker 1>to thinking that ballot initiative being successful, is that what

378
00:25:45.240 --> 00:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>spurs some of the California old guard Orange County Republican

379
00:25:50.000 --> 00:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>money to maybe think about maybe we invest in a

380
00:25:55.000 --> 00:25:59.279
<v Speaker 1>couple of more things. Because this is as far as

381
00:25:59.359 --> 00:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I can tell. I'm not a one hundred percent expert

382
00:26:01.759 --> 00:26:03.559
<v Speaker 1>in these things, but I've seen glimpses of this stuff.

383
00:26:03.599 --> 00:26:08.559
<v Speaker 1>This is the lay of the land with Republican money

384
00:26:08.839 --> 00:26:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in California. So Orange County is still a big deal

385
00:26:18.480 --> 00:26:23.559
<v Speaker 1>in Republican politics because a lot of very, very wealthy

386
00:26:23.599 --> 00:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Republican donors live there. You'll often see national Republican figures

387
00:26:34.039 --> 00:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on social media some.

388
00:26:35.000 --> 00:26:37.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh just taking a visit out to Orange County.

389
00:26:38.359 --> 00:26:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Hmm, I wonder why they're doing that. It's quite obvious

390
00:26:42.519 --> 00:26:45.559
<v Speaker 1>why they're doing that. They're doing that to go fundraise.

391
00:26:49.720 --> 00:26:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Orange County still has a ton of Republican money. San

392
00:26:55.880 --> 00:26:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Joaquin Valley has some big Republican money, but Orange County

393
00:26:59.880 --> 00:27:02.079
<v Speaker 1>is a real and there are a couple of donors

394
00:27:02.119 --> 00:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the San Juaquin Valley who are significant players on

395
00:27:04.480 --> 00:27:09.079
<v Speaker 1>the national scene. But it's in Orange County where a

396
00:27:09.119 --> 00:27:12.599
<v Speaker 1>ton of Republican money resides, and the attitudes of Orange

397
00:27:12.640 --> 00:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>County Republicans tend to dominate the state party now basically

398
00:27:21.640 --> 00:27:25.039
<v Speaker 1>Orange County Republicans, I think for the last decade or so,

399
00:27:26.839 --> 00:27:30.759
<v Speaker 1>they've largely given up on the state. They've given up,

400
00:27:33.480 --> 00:27:36.599
<v Speaker 1>they've certainly given up on social conservative causes. After the

401
00:27:36.599 --> 00:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>flame out of Prop eight, which here's Prop eight. We

402
00:27:40.880 --> 00:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>pass Prop eight. We define in the California state Constitution

403
00:27:43.960 --> 00:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that a marriors between a man and a woman and

404
00:27:45.400 --> 00:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens. One federal judge in San Francisco says that

405
00:27:48.200 --> 00:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it violates the US Constitution. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Brown

406
00:27:53.000 --> 00:27:56.039
<v Speaker 1>refuse to defend Prop eight in court. It goes all

407
00:27:56.039 --> 00:27:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the way to the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court says, well,

408
00:27:58.359 --> 00:28:01.839
<v Speaker 1>if the governor or attorney general of a state won't

409
00:28:01.880 --> 00:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>defend the law in court, then there's nobody herewithstanding to

410
00:28:06.720 --> 00:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>actually be defending the law. So the ruling from the

411
00:28:09.880 --> 00:28:12.839
<v Speaker 1>federal judge in San Francisco holds, and that's how Prop

412
00:28:12.880 --> 00:28:16.279
<v Speaker 1>eight got overturned, with the Supreme Court saying, well, on

413
00:28:16.319 --> 00:28:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a standing issue, if the governor refuses to defend it,

414
00:28:19.359 --> 00:28:23.039
<v Speaker 1>and the Attorney General refused to defend it, then nothing

415
00:28:23.039 --> 00:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we can do. That's how Prop eight flamed out. So

416
00:28:25.279 --> 00:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>all that work, all that stirm and drawing over Prop

417
00:28:27.519 --> 00:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>eight and it died with a whimper. Then in twenty thirteen,

418
00:28:32.200 --> 00:28:38.799
<v Speaker 1>of course, it completely died after the Obergefeld decision. So

419
00:28:38.960 --> 00:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Orange County Republican donors are just tired. They're

420
00:28:43.000 --> 00:28:45.839
<v Speaker 1>tired of funding campaigns that they.

421
00:28:45.759 --> 00:28:46.519
<v Speaker 2>Know will lose.

422
00:28:46.559 --> 00:28:49.759
<v Speaker 1>They're tired of everything, and the only thing they kind

423
00:28:49.759 --> 00:28:53.559
<v Speaker 1>of stir their stumps over is anything that might impact

424
00:28:53.799 --> 00:28:58.279
<v Speaker 1>historic Prop thirteen. Don't want to pay property taxes. Howard

425
00:28:58.359 --> 00:29:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Taxpayers Association is still a force because of those donors,

426
00:29:03.640 --> 00:29:08.119
<v Speaker 1>and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association was able to block a

427
00:29:08.200 --> 00:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of bad ballot initiatives this year. But there's just

428
00:29:16.480 --> 00:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but basically, Orange County Republican donors have been playing a

429
00:29:21.039 --> 00:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>defense game. They're not spending offensively, they are playing defense

430
00:29:25.640 --> 00:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to block the worst ballot initiative proposals, sometimes successfully. But

431
00:29:34.200 --> 00:29:39.279
<v Speaker 1>they've completely given up on social conservatism in California, and

432
00:29:39.319 --> 00:29:43.079
<v Speaker 1>they've mostly given up on electoral politics in California. They're

433
00:29:43.079 --> 00:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not spending big on governors or senators or anything like that.

434
00:29:48.599 --> 00:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Governor candidates, Senate candidates, et cetera. But Prop thirty six

435
00:29:54.039 --> 00:29:57.759
<v Speaker 1>passing and this subtle right word shift in the country

436
00:29:57.920 --> 00:30:03.279
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder do some of these people rethink this stuff?

437
00:30:04.000 --> 00:30:05.759
<v Speaker 2>Because that's the thing with a.

438
00:30:05.759 --> 00:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Ballot initiative system. It's not that hard to qualify something,

439
00:30:09.839 --> 00:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and if you position it right and you capture the

440
00:30:12.240 --> 00:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>mood of the people the right way, you can pass something.

441
00:30:17.480 --> 00:30:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean Prop thirty six pass with seventy two percent

442
00:30:20.640 --> 00:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of the state voting for it, in spite of opposition

443
00:30:23.960 --> 00:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>from the governor and all of the powers that be.

444
00:30:32.279 --> 00:30:33.039
<v Speaker 2>What if.

445
00:30:34.359 --> 00:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Any massive Orange County slash Sewakeean Valley billionaire donors who

446
00:30:39.000 --> 00:30:41.599
<v Speaker 1>might be listening to this, What if we introduced and

447
00:30:41.680 --> 00:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>qualified a ballot initiative to address one or more of

448
00:30:48.480 --> 00:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the state's major problems in ways that would be widely popular.

449
00:30:55.200 --> 00:31:04.039
<v Speaker 1>For example, abolish or highly reform sequa. We need more

450
00:31:04.039 --> 00:31:08.039
<v Speaker 1>housing sequa is the great obstacle to housing. We all

451
00:31:08.079 --> 00:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>know this.

452
00:31:10.279 --> 00:31:11.839
<v Speaker 2>Why not pass a ballid initiative for it?

453
00:31:15.200 --> 00:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>We know that California gas prices are high because of

454
00:31:20.400 --> 00:31:24.759
<v Speaker 1>certain specific things. We know that they are high because

455
00:31:24.839 --> 00:31:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of California having this special blend of California specific gas

456
00:31:29.680 --> 00:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that has to be produced, So gas companies have to

457
00:31:33.680 --> 00:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>set up a separate refinery chain just to produce California

458
00:31:37.480 --> 00:31:40.759
<v Speaker 1>compliant gasoline. That's why our gas is more expensive that

459
00:31:40.880 --> 00:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>plus taxes. Why don't we pass a ballot initiative to

460
00:31:46.400 --> 00:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>end that? Now, you'll have to fight through the fact

461
00:31:52.200 --> 00:31:57.559
<v Speaker 1>that the Attorney General will very unfairly category characterize that

462
00:31:57.640 --> 00:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>ballot initiative on the actual ballot. You know, you pass

463
00:32:01.240 --> 00:32:05.799
<v Speaker 1>some you qualify a ballot initiative to you know, just

464
00:32:05.920 --> 00:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>let California sell normal gas, and the Attorney General, Rob

465
00:32:09.200 --> 00:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Bonta gets to write the description in the ballot and

466
00:32:11.680 --> 00:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>he'll say, a proposal to increase pollution in California. That's

467
00:32:16.200 --> 00:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>probably what I'll say. And maybe you can't fight through that.

468
00:32:22.000 --> 00:32:22.599
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know.

469
00:32:22.880 --> 00:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there are more opportunities, more avenues for fighting

470
00:32:29.240 --> 00:32:36.519
<v Speaker 1>things in a targeted way in California where we could

471
00:32:36.559 --> 00:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>actually pass some kind of conservative outcome when we return.

472
00:32:42.440 --> 00:32:48.359
<v Speaker 1>The one person who lingers over this discussion, the potential

473
00:32:48.400 --> 00:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>wail who could alter all of this our George Soros,

474
00:32:57.000 --> 00:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. That's next on the John Girardi Show. Donald

475
00:33:02.519 --> 00:33:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump has been just flying all over the place with

476
00:33:05.359 --> 00:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk for the last, you know, two weeks since

477
00:33:08.920 --> 00:33:14.039
<v Speaker 1>the election. Basically the two are inseparable, and they were

478
00:33:14.039 --> 00:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>at some gala events over the past weekend. It's the

479
00:33:19.039 --> 00:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think tank that's sort of most closely identified with Trump,

480
00:33:22.680 --> 00:33:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the American First Principles Institute.

481
00:33:26.880 --> 00:33:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Something like that.

482
00:33:29.200 --> 00:33:33.559
<v Speaker 1>It has a lot of former Trump administration people working

483
00:33:33.599 --> 00:33:35.559
<v Speaker 1>for it, and it seems like it's going to be

484
00:33:36.599 --> 00:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>its ideas, its locus or so. It was sort of

485
00:33:38.680 --> 00:33:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration in waiting in this sort of interlude

486
00:33:42.359 --> 00:33:46.799
<v Speaker 1>between Trump forty five and Trump forty seven. Now, at

487
00:33:46.839 --> 00:33:52.119
<v Speaker 1>this gala event, there were some species given and someone said,

488
00:33:52.640 --> 00:33:53.559
<v Speaker 1>just a matter where is it?

489
00:33:53.599 --> 00:33:56.880
<v Speaker 2>You know what great things we can do, but we

490
00:33:56.920 --> 00:33:58.119
<v Speaker 2>need to sustain this movement.

491
00:33:58.480 --> 00:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Where is our George Soro and Elon Musk is sitting

492
00:34:01.920 --> 00:34:06.759
<v Speaker 1>there and he raises his hand. I think it's not

493
00:34:06.920 --> 00:34:09.519
<v Speaker 1>talked about as much as it has been talked about,

494
00:34:10.480 --> 00:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I still don't think it's talked about enough. What a

495
00:34:13.920 --> 00:34:18.679
<v Speaker 1>significant bit of news it is that the Republican Party

496
00:34:19.480 --> 00:34:28.760
<v Speaker 1>recruited the wealthiest man on God's Green Earth to become

497
00:34:28.920 --> 00:34:36.639
<v Speaker 1>a donor, a major donor who seemingly wants to commit

498
00:34:36.800 --> 00:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>himself to ongoing donor support of Republican efforts, and just

499
00:34:44.159 --> 00:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, referred to himself agreed with the characterization of

500
00:34:48.039 --> 00:34:52.199
<v Speaker 1>himself as the George Soros of the right. For those

501
00:34:52.199 --> 00:34:54.199
<v Speaker 1>who don't know, I mean, what has George Soros done

502
00:34:54.199 --> 00:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>well through his Open Society foundage whatever. George Soros basically

503
00:34:58.360 --> 00:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>helped create a man massive network of interlinking five on

504
00:35:03.119 --> 00:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>C threes, five O and C fours and packs to

505
00:35:06.679 --> 00:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>influence policy, elections, legislation at the federal, state, and local level.

506
00:35:17.519 --> 00:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>All these hyper left wing DA's, where do they come from? Well,

507
00:35:20.400 --> 00:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>they come from George Soros giving money through again his

508
00:35:23.960 --> 00:35:26.679
<v Speaker 1>vast network of interconnected packs, five on and C fours

509
00:35:26.679 --> 00:35:31.199
<v Speaker 1>and five to one C threes. But it's his money

510
00:35:31.239 --> 00:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>funding it, and he was able to affect massive changes

511
00:35:35.639 --> 00:35:40.239
<v Speaker 1>in American criminal law enforcement. Massively terrible changes, I think,

512
00:35:40.280 --> 00:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>but massive changes. Elon Musk no longer is a California resident,

513
00:35:48.920 --> 00:35:55.639
<v Speaker 1>that's true, but he still got homes in California. He

514
00:35:55.719 --> 00:36:00.280
<v Speaker 1>used to live here. It's where he started Tesla. He's

515
00:36:00.320 --> 00:36:02.519
<v Speaker 1>got to have some residual affection for this place, and

516
00:36:02.559 --> 00:36:07.199
<v Speaker 1>he's got to realize that California is a major, important

517
00:36:07.239 --> 00:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the American economy. If he still wants Tesla

518
00:36:14.920 --> 00:36:18.039
<v Speaker 1>or SpaceX or his various entities to do various kinds

519
00:36:18.039 --> 00:36:20.559
<v Speaker 1>of business in California, he should take an interest to

520
00:36:20.639 --> 00:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in California politics.

521
00:36:22.960 --> 00:36:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Elon was dropping forty.

522
00:36:24.480 --> 00:36:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Million dollars a month in ad buys for the Trump

523
00:36:27.079 --> 00:36:32.280
<v Speaker 1>campaign during the twenty twenty four election cycle. You could

524
00:36:32.639 --> 00:36:37.199
<v Speaker 1>pass a ballot initiative in California with just forty million dollars.

525
00:36:38.719 --> 00:36:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Just forty million dollars.

526
00:36:41.679 --> 00:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That's more than enough to successfully pass a ballot initiative

527
00:36:44.840 --> 00:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>in this state. I really think California Republican officials need

528
00:36:57.280 --> 00:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to get in touch with him.

529
00:36:59.760 --> 00:37:01.639
<v Speaker 1>And I think what we should think about is, like,

530
00:37:01.679 --> 00:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>what are the two or three things If Prop thirty

531
00:37:04.280 --> 00:37:06.519
<v Speaker 1>six could pass with seventy two percent of the vote,

532
00:37:06.599 --> 00:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>it shows certain kinds of conservative ideas can pass via

533
00:37:11.280 --> 00:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the ballot initiative system in this state. People want more housing.

534
00:37:17.320 --> 00:37:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Is there a way to limit SEQUA Is there a

535
00:37:21.599 --> 00:37:24.039
<v Speaker 1>way to limit California environmental regulation in such a way

536
00:37:24.079 --> 00:37:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as to allow for more housing. Is there a way

537
00:37:26.519 --> 00:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>to change our laws regulating gasoline to make guests less expensive?

538
00:37:32.360 --> 00:37:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Is there a way to change the housing market?

539
00:37:33.960 --> 00:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Is there a way to change these various aspects of

540
00:37:36.440 --> 00:37:39.559
<v Speaker 1>California that are just ruining the state via the ballot

541
00:37:39.559 --> 00:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>initiative system. We can't reform the state legislature overnight. It's

542
00:37:43.960 --> 00:37:49.559
<v Speaker 1>still three quarters Democrats. Even if you have a Republican

543
00:37:49.559 --> 00:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>governor win in twenty twenty six, there's not much he

544
00:37:51.960 --> 00:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>could do. Do we abolish the California Air Resources Board.

545
00:37:58.239 --> 00:38:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Californians need to realize that the game has changed. If

546
00:38:01.800 --> 00:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Elon is willing to spend on ballot initiatives in California,

547
00:38:06.480 --> 00:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the game has changed.

548
00:38:09.360 --> 00:38:09.719
<v Speaker 2>That'll do it.

549
00:38:09.800 --> 00:38:11.679
<v Speaker 1>John Jlady show, see you next time on Power Talk.
