WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.120 --> 00:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, sorry, James, I'll go ahead. I just asked if

2
00:00:03.240 --> 00:00:04.759
<v Speaker 1>you want.

3
00:00:03.520 --> 00:00:03.600
<v Speaker 2>But.

4
00:00:05.360 --> 00:00:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I will, and you can take it wherever you wish.

5
00:00:07.000 --> 00:00:09.080
<v Speaker 3>That's what we do here. Imagine your roblong and I'm

6
00:00:09.080 --> 00:00:10.720
<v Speaker 3>asking a question that he's just going to go where

7
00:00:10.720 --> 00:00:11.240
<v Speaker 3>he wants to go.

8
00:00:12.640 --> 00:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Ask not what your country can do for you, Ask

9
00:00:17.879 --> 00:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>what you can do for your country.

10
00:00:20.440 --> 00:00:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Mister Gorbut you'll tear down this wall. It's the Ricordshe

11
00:00:26.559 --> 00:00:28.839
<v Speaker 3>Podcast with Stephen Hayward and Charles C. W.

12
00:00:29.039 --> 00:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Cook.

13
00:00:29.519 --> 00:00:31.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm James Lellax. Today we're going to be talking to

14
00:00:31.280 --> 00:00:34.119
<v Speaker 3>Anne McCarthy about Trump's leap of woes and more so,

15
00:00:34.280 --> 00:00:35.600
<v Speaker 3>let severs was a podcast.

16
00:00:36.399 --> 00:00:39.640
<v Speaker 4>How should voters look at some of the changes that

17
00:00:39.679 --> 00:00:43.960
<v Speaker 4>you've made that you've explained some of here in your policy.

18
00:00:44.840 --> 00:00:47.479
<v Speaker 4>Is it because you have more experience now and you've

19
00:00:47.520 --> 00:00:51.079
<v Speaker 4>learned more about the information? Is it because you were

20
00:00:51.119 --> 00:00:54.960
<v Speaker 4>running for president and a Democratic primary? And should they

21
00:00:55.000 --> 00:00:58.359
<v Speaker 4>feel comfortable and confident that what you're saying now is

22
00:00:58.359 --> 00:00:59.320
<v Speaker 4>going to be your policy?

23
00:00:59.399 --> 00:01:03.119
<v Speaker 3>Moving from Welcome everybody, this is the Ricochet Podcast, number

24
00:01:03.159 --> 00:01:06.920
<v Speaker 3>seven hundred and six. I'm James Lilax drinking a cup

25
00:01:06.959 --> 00:01:10.400
<v Speaker 3>of tepid office coffee in a skyscraper in downtown Minneapolis,

26
00:01:10.400 --> 00:01:14.359
<v Speaker 3>which did not burn to the ground parts. Yes, but

27
00:01:15.920 --> 00:01:17.959
<v Speaker 3>the fires did not lap on the shores of our

28
00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:20.680
<v Speaker 3>corporate office here and I'm joined by Stephen Hayward and

29
00:01:20.879 --> 00:01:26.079
<v Speaker 3>Charles C. W. Cook. Gentlemen, Hello, between Florida and California.

30
00:01:26.200 --> 00:01:27.799
<v Speaker 3>Once again we span the nation.

31
00:01:31.159 --> 00:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually, James, I am coming to today from Raykovic, Iceland.

32
00:01:34.799 --> 00:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>We're combining a business and pleasure trip. But I have

33
00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>found something for your Lilax Museum of Curious Cultural Collections,

34
00:01:43.000 --> 00:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever you call it. Did you know, Yeah, because r

35
00:01:45.719 --> 00:01:48.439
<v Speaker 1>right next to my hotel turns out to be the

36
00:01:48.680 --> 00:01:52.159
<v Speaker 1>most visited museum in Iceland. It's called the Icelandic Fall.

37
00:01:52.319 --> 00:01:54.159
<v Speaker 1>A lot of hamilgrit and Theseum.

38
00:01:54.840 --> 00:01:58.879
<v Speaker 3>No, it's not okay, No, I know what you're thinking.

39
00:01:58.959 --> 00:02:00.519
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking of the hot dog place that's the other

40
00:02:00.599 --> 00:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>side of my hotel.

41
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:02.159
<v Speaker 4>No.

42
00:02:02.200 --> 00:02:03.719
<v Speaker 3>I believe it was a hamburger that was putt It

43
00:02:03.760 --> 00:02:06.040
<v Speaker 3>was a hamburger, that hamberger that was put under glass

44
00:02:06.040 --> 00:02:08.759
<v Speaker 3>in Iceland about twenty years ago McDonald's Hamburger and is

45
00:02:08.759 --> 00:02:13.319
<v Speaker 3>not decomposed in the least bit anyway. So phallologically, yeah,

46
00:02:13.439 --> 00:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>what's the only it's the only penis museum in the

47
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:17.479
<v Speaker 3>world that is exactly what you think it is.

48
00:02:17.879 --> 00:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Ah, Okay, the brochure says it's family friendly. I'm skeptical

49
00:02:21.680 --> 00:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of this, but there you go. I'll send you the brochure.

50
00:02:24.879 --> 00:02:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, since my side is the Gallery of Regrettable Food,

51
00:02:28.199 --> 00:02:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I am not sure whether or not that would constitute

52
00:02:31.520 --> 00:02:34.080
<v Speaker 3>a goustatory experience, but of course it depends on one's

53
00:02:34.080 --> 00:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>orientation of preference.

54
00:02:38.000 --> 00:02:40.599
<v Speaker 1>They have a phallic cafe b stro James, so maybe

55
00:02:40.639 --> 00:02:42.439
<v Speaker 1>it will make your gast Okay.

56
00:02:43.560 --> 00:02:46.439
<v Speaker 3>I you know, I I missed that when I was there,

57
00:02:46.479 --> 00:02:48.680
<v Speaker 3>and I advise that everybody in their lifetime should go

58
00:02:48.719 --> 00:02:52.840
<v Speaker 3>to Iceland, because it really is an incredible, spectacular, amazing place,

59
00:02:52.879 --> 00:02:56.080
<v Speaker 3>this little island of civil It's little, this this this

60
00:02:56.120 --> 00:03:00.080
<v Speaker 3>civilization that they built on this rock, which has in

61
00:03:00.159 --> 00:03:02.199
<v Speaker 3>the you know, a certain part of the day, a

62
00:03:02.199 --> 00:03:04.599
<v Speaker 3>certain part of the year, it's just always bright and

63
00:03:04.639 --> 00:03:06.280
<v Speaker 3>then a certain part of the year is always dark.

64
00:03:06.520 --> 00:03:09.439
<v Speaker 3>So everyone has two jobs in an alcoholic habit and

65
00:03:09.439 --> 00:03:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and they're in a band. I just I love the place, Charles.

66
00:03:12.759 --> 00:03:14.240
<v Speaker 3>How are you? How's Florida Muggy?

67
00:03:14.360 --> 00:03:17.360
<v Speaker 5>I assume no, it's really nice. It's really nice. I've

68
00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:22.120
<v Speaker 5>bed to Iceland. I went in two thousand and seven.

69
00:03:23.479 --> 00:03:26.479
<v Speaker 5>I agree, everyone's drunk, but that's why they have no money,

70
00:03:26.479 --> 00:03:30.400
<v Speaker 5>because it's so expensive to drink in ice. And that's

71
00:03:30.439 --> 00:03:34.280
<v Speaker 5>in Scandinavia. And I annoyed my sister on that trip

72
00:03:34.319 --> 00:03:36.639
<v Speaker 5>by eating a puffin in a restaurant.

73
00:03:39.039 --> 00:03:41.039
<v Speaker 3>Braids braised, puffin. Why not?

74
00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:42.520
<v Speaker 6>It was on the menu.

75
00:03:42.719 --> 00:03:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Do they bring the beak?

76
00:03:44.360 --> 00:03:44.439
<v Speaker 4>No?

77
00:03:44.719 --> 00:03:46.159
<v Speaker 5>But it was on the menu, and I thought, well,

78
00:03:46.159 --> 00:03:49.240
<v Speaker 5>I'll try that because I like trying random and unusual things.

79
00:03:49.280 --> 00:03:51.039
<v Speaker 5>And then she said, well, you can't eat a puffin.

80
00:03:51.280 --> 00:03:52.919
<v Speaker 5>They're so cute, and I thought, well, now I have

81
00:03:52.960 --> 00:03:53.919
<v Speaker 5>to eat a puffin.

82
00:03:55.199 --> 00:03:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Well they don't they taste like spotted owls?

83
00:03:57.479 --> 00:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>I think, I exactly with a little snail darter relish

84
00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:05.439
<v Speaker 3>if you will. One of the things that I love

85
00:04:05.479 --> 00:04:08.560
<v Speaker 3>about Iceland, Reykovic, and also what it sort of says

86
00:04:08.560 --> 00:04:10.759
<v Speaker 3>about Europe and Northern Europe, is that they have this

87
00:04:10.919 --> 00:04:15.479
<v Speaker 3>incredible modern cathedral, this church. But you don't really get

88
00:04:15.479 --> 00:04:18.279
<v Speaker 3>the sense that anybody believes in any of that stuff.

89
00:04:18.360 --> 00:04:19.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you were to believe it, if you

90
00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:22.600
<v Speaker 3>were to build a church for a culture that was

91
00:04:22.720 --> 00:04:28.480
<v Speaker 3>nominally habitually, ritualistically Christian, but really didn't believe it it

92
00:04:28.519 --> 00:04:30.439
<v Speaker 3>would be that church. That was just the feeling that

93
00:04:30.480 --> 00:04:34.439
<v Speaker 3>I got. It's so spare, it is absolutely so white

94
00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:39.959
<v Speaker 3>and so pure, but so somehow lacking that wonderful effervescent

95
00:04:40.040 --> 00:04:42.399
<v Speaker 3>divinity that you get in baroque churches, for example. But

96
00:04:42.480 --> 00:04:44.519
<v Speaker 3>enough of our travelog gear. We're here to discuss the

97
00:04:44.600 --> 00:04:46.399
<v Speaker 3>ways and means by which the country is going to

98
00:04:46.399 --> 00:04:49.160
<v Speaker 3>come to rack and or ruin or success or as usual,

99
00:04:49.720 --> 00:04:53.079
<v Speaker 3>middle and muddel in betwixt the two points. So we

100
00:04:53.120 --> 00:04:56.639
<v Speaker 3>had an interview with Kamala Harris this week on CNN

101
00:04:56.680 --> 00:05:01.079
<v Speaker 3>in which she laid everything out. I get the impression

102
00:05:01.240 --> 00:05:03.319
<v Speaker 3>that the problem that we have been suffering in this

103
00:05:03.399 --> 00:05:07.839
<v Speaker 3>country is an insufficient amount of government. Is that basically

104
00:05:07.879 --> 00:05:11.519
<v Speaker 3>what you get. We're about four percent away. For if

105
00:05:11.519 --> 00:05:14.279
<v Speaker 3>we had four percent or maybe seven percent more government,

106
00:05:14.319 --> 00:05:17.480
<v Speaker 3>we would solve housing, we would solve the middle class problems.

107
00:05:17.480 --> 00:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>We would solve climate change, which we have to do

108
00:05:20.399 --> 00:05:23.279
<v Speaker 3>on a schedule that is of time and to hours

109
00:05:23.319 --> 00:05:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and the weeks that she said, so, what did you

110
00:05:25.720 --> 00:05:28.759
<v Speaker 3>take away from this? Did you do you think this

111
00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>is a fresh breath emanating from the Biden administration. A

112
00:05:31.879 --> 00:05:38.639
<v Speaker 3>clean break revitalized attempt to drag Joe Biden's great policies

113
00:05:38.680 --> 00:05:43.759
<v Speaker 3>over the goal line. Well don't everybody talk at once.

114
00:05:44.199 --> 00:05:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Now.

115
00:05:44.560 --> 00:05:47.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what I made of it, because she

116
00:05:47.800 --> 00:05:54.279
<v Speaker 5>didn't say anything. She did an interview, she well, she

117
00:05:54.560 --> 00:05:58.240
<v Speaker 5>answered questions, but she didn't really advance anything. And there

118
00:05:58.279 --> 00:06:00.360
<v Speaker 5>was a tweet that went out off It's by DNM

119
00:06:00.360 --> 00:06:02.639
<v Speaker 5>where they said, we got closer to understanding. They always

120
00:06:02.639 --> 00:06:05.600
<v Speaker 5>talk about her, so she's an ancient Mayan civilization. We

121
00:06:05.680 --> 00:06:10.680
<v Speaker 5>got closer to understanding what Kamala Harris wants to do.

122
00:06:10.839 --> 00:06:13.759
<v Speaker 5>And I thought, well, actually that's not true at all.

123
00:06:14.040 --> 00:06:18.079
<v Speaker 5>She didn't account for her shifts in policy. She said,

124
00:06:18.759 --> 00:06:21.120
<v Speaker 5>my values haven't changed. And what she should have done

125
00:06:21.160 --> 00:06:23.360
<v Speaker 5>if she was going to make that argument is say,

126
00:06:24.199 --> 00:06:27.000
<v Speaker 5>here are two or three examples of where the policy

127
00:06:27.040 --> 00:06:29.759
<v Speaker 5>has changed, but the values that informed them were different

128
00:06:29.959 --> 00:06:33.240
<v Speaker 5>for this or that reason. In fact, Dana Bash tried

129
00:06:33.279 --> 00:06:35.879
<v Speaker 5>to set her up to do that by giving her

130
00:06:35.879 --> 00:06:39.439
<v Speaker 5>the answer before she gave it, but she didn't. She

131
00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:43.439
<v Speaker 5>then said that, oh, I know that in twenty nineteen

132
00:06:43.439 --> 00:06:45.639
<v Speaker 5>I said I would ban fracking, but in twenty twenty,

133
00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:48.079
<v Speaker 5>I said I wouldn't, which isn't even true. In twenty

134
00:06:48.160 --> 00:06:51.639
<v Speaker 5>twenty she said Joe Biden wouldn't ban fracking. She didn't

135
00:06:51.680 --> 00:06:54.879
<v Speaker 5>explain why she shifted view, or even if she has so.

136
00:06:55.079 --> 00:06:59.879
<v Speaker 5>Throughout Yes, I got the vague, effveescent sense that she

137
00:07:00.399 --> 00:07:03.959
<v Speaker 5>wants more government and that she thinks that we have

138
00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:07.360
<v Speaker 5>been beholden to some ancient ideology for too long. But

139
00:07:07.399 --> 00:07:11.639
<v Speaker 5>she never actually really outline what she wanted to do,

140
00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:15.160
<v Speaker 5>so I don't think it was particularly useful as a voter.

141
00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:20.319
<v Speaker 3>Stephen. There have been attempts recently, devious attempts, I think

142
00:07:20.480 --> 00:07:23.959
<v Speaker 3>rhetorical slights of hands that have attempted to tether That's

143
00:07:24.000 --> 00:07:27.079
<v Speaker 3>the word Kamila Harris with a Biden adminstration. Was there

144
00:07:27.240 --> 00:07:29.399
<v Speaker 3>was there tethering going on? Was there breaking going on?

145
00:07:29.600 --> 00:07:33.439
<v Speaker 3>Was there was there? Was there anything going on that

146
00:07:33.480 --> 00:07:35.120
<v Speaker 3>made you sit up and say that's new?

147
00:07:36.160 --> 00:07:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. One of the blessings of being

148
00:07:38.639 --> 00:07:40.519
<v Speaker 1>on overseas travel as you got to miss it, and

149
00:07:40.560 --> 00:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I've only caught up with a few things I've seen online.

150
00:07:43.519 --> 00:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Charlie puts his finger on something. The most

151
00:07:46.199 --> 00:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>important part of it is her saying over and over

152
00:07:48.360 --> 00:07:52.759
<v Speaker 1>again her one message was my values haven't changed, which

153
00:07:52.759 --> 00:07:54.879
<v Speaker 1>ought to be the four most terrifying words in the

154
00:07:54.879 --> 00:07:57.639
<v Speaker 1>English language today, you know, after one's the old Ronald

155
00:07:57.680 --> 00:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Ringing line, I'm from the government. I'm here to help,

156
00:08:00.120 --> 00:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>because what are those values. They're all pretty deeply radical,

157
00:08:03.399 --> 00:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>as any check of the record will show. And if

158
00:08:06.720 --> 00:08:08.839
<v Speaker 1>you had an alert Trump campaign, and it's still not

159
00:08:08.920 --> 00:08:11.279
<v Speaker 1>clear whether we have one or not, they would be

160
00:08:11.399 --> 00:08:13.319
<v Speaker 1>running ads and they just have a clip of her

161
00:08:13.360 --> 00:08:15.519
<v Speaker 1>saying my values haven't changed, and then just throwing up

162
00:08:15.560 --> 00:08:17.639
<v Speaker 1>on the screen some of her previous statements on what

163
00:08:17.680 --> 00:08:20.759
<v Speaker 1>her values are. I think that it was a wink

164
00:08:20.879 --> 00:08:24.519
<v Speaker 1>and a nod to progressives and the media. Who are

165
00:08:24.560 --> 00:08:26.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, carrying water for saying, you know, don't worry,

166
00:08:27.040 --> 00:08:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm still the progressive if you want, and you know,

167
00:08:29.480 --> 00:08:33.759
<v Speaker 1>backing down on fracking and sting relatively quiet about climate change.

168
00:08:34.159 --> 00:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, it's going to be you know,

169
00:08:36.720 --> 00:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Biden times ten when I get past the electorates in November.

170
00:08:41.399 --> 00:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is not new, by the way,

171
00:08:43.200 --> 00:08:45.399
<v Speaker 1>this has been a democratic playbook for quite a while,

172
00:08:45.799 --> 00:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and people like Obama going all the way back to

173
00:08:48.360 --> 00:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Doucaucus can try and get away with it, and have

174
00:08:50.840 --> 00:08:54.039
<v Speaker 1>in some instances, like Bill Clinton, But in her case,

175
00:08:54.120 --> 00:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>she's got such a long record of very radical views

176
00:08:57.159 --> 00:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that it still astounds me to think that she can

177
00:09:00.159 --> 00:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>away with it. On the other hand, as has been

178
00:09:02.159 --> 00:09:05.159
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, the election is not sixty five days off

179
00:09:05.240 --> 00:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is. Early voting starts in three weeks,

180
00:09:08.080 --> 00:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and so the votes will start getting locked into the

181
00:09:10.120 --> 00:09:11.799
<v Speaker 1>can very very soon.

182
00:09:12.480 --> 00:09:12.639
<v Speaker 4>Well.

183
00:09:12.679 --> 00:09:15.320
<v Speaker 3>The CNN story about the interview says, Harris laid out

184
00:09:15.320 --> 00:09:17.799
<v Speaker 3>an economic plan earlier this month, did you know, focused

185
00:09:17.840 --> 00:09:20.879
<v Speaker 3>on bringing down costs on food, housing, and childcare, in

186
00:09:20.919 --> 00:09:24.799
<v Speaker 3>part by going harder after corporations. There's stunning new development.

187
00:09:24.799 --> 00:09:28.679
<v Speaker 3>She's going harder after those corporations. Her proposals include efforts

188
00:09:28.679 --> 00:09:32.840
<v Speaker 3>to combat price gouging. My my mind, Okay, so we

189
00:09:33.000 --> 00:09:34.720
<v Speaker 3>are going to do that again, where we're going to

190
00:09:34.720 --> 00:09:36.519
<v Speaker 3>go and investigate and of course it doesn't matter whether

191
00:09:36.600 --> 00:09:39.120
<v Speaker 3>or not anybody actually is price gouging. What matters is

192
00:09:39.159 --> 00:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>that they're going to be dragged through a process that

193
00:09:40.879 --> 00:09:43.559
<v Speaker 3>we'll just add to their costs and you know, cripple

194
00:09:43.759 --> 00:09:46.600
<v Speaker 3>them and keep them from doing things and hesitate to

195
00:09:46.600 --> 00:09:49.080
<v Speaker 3>do this and they'll have rippling effects about the entire economy.

196
00:09:49.080 --> 00:09:51.360
<v Speaker 3>But oh, well, you know she's doing something. She's least

197
00:09:51.440 --> 00:09:54.519
<v Speaker 3>she's doing something. Recently, here we had an institution which

198
00:09:54.600 --> 00:09:58.120
<v Speaker 3>raised its prices by eight percent. Eight percent, just announce

199
00:09:58.240 --> 00:10:01.240
<v Speaker 3>eight percent. And the strain thing about it is here

200
00:10:01.559 --> 00:10:03.159
<v Speaker 3>is that you don't have the option not to pay.

201
00:10:03.480 --> 00:10:06.639
<v Speaker 3>You have to because there are property taxes. Our property

202
00:10:06.639 --> 00:10:09.159
<v Speaker 3>taxes going up eight percent, and what's more, because of

203
00:10:09.200 --> 00:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>the new evaluations. It's a tax on unrealized gains. It's

204
00:10:13.559 --> 00:10:16.279
<v Speaker 3>just perfect. Do we have any saying this, No, no, no,

205
00:10:16.600 --> 00:10:19.320
<v Speaker 3>we just absolutely have to pay. That's not gouging at all, though. No,

206
00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:22.279
<v Speaker 3>that's an absolutely reasonable response to the needs of the

207
00:10:22.440 --> 00:10:24.679
<v Speaker 3>particulars of the people. But she also said that she

208
00:10:24.759 --> 00:10:27.559
<v Speaker 3>was going to ramp up construction of affordable housing. Now,

209
00:10:27.600 --> 00:10:29.639
<v Speaker 3>low information people may not look at that and nod

210
00:10:29.639 --> 00:10:32.279
<v Speaker 3>and say, well, that's good. Folks need housing. That's something,

211
00:10:32.519 --> 00:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>But this is not the job of the federal government.

212
00:10:35.840 --> 00:10:37.679
<v Speaker 3>The reason that you don't have affordable housing and so

213
00:10:37.720 --> 00:10:40.000
<v Speaker 3>many of the cities that need it. Leaving aside whether

214
00:10:40.080 --> 00:10:43.080
<v Speaker 3>or not the homeless crisis is a result of the

215
00:10:43.159 --> 00:10:46.360
<v Speaker 3>lack of affordable housing usually isn't is because you have

216
00:10:46.799 --> 00:10:50.120
<v Speaker 3>any number of heavy boat anchors that are draped around

217
00:10:50.120 --> 00:10:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the neck of the people who are trying to build

218
00:10:51.639 --> 00:10:55.879
<v Speaker 3>these things, from the code requirements to the cost of material,

219
00:10:55.919 --> 00:10:59.360
<v Speaker 3>from this to that that. I mean, San Francisco does

220
00:10:59.360 --> 00:11:02.120
<v Speaker 3>not have an a lack of affordable housing because there

221
00:11:02.120 --> 00:11:05.000
<v Speaker 3>are people just for some reason who can't build there.

222
00:11:05.039 --> 00:11:07.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's it's the process, it's the rules, it's

223
00:11:07.720 --> 00:11:09.679
<v Speaker 3>the nimbi's, it's the rest of it, things over which

224
00:11:09.720 --> 00:11:13.879
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris has absolutely no control whatsoever, unless we want

225
00:11:14.240 --> 00:11:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the federal government to march into our communities and say, well,

226
00:11:17.279 --> 00:11:19.559
<v Speaker 3>you know what, you don't have enough affordable housing in

227
00:11:19.600 --> 00:11:23.320
<v Speaker 3>this neighborhood. Therefore we're gonna build them, which they've been

228
00:11:23.360 --> 00:11:25.120
<v Speaker 3>trying to do for years and years and years and

229
00:11:25.200 --> 00:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>years and years. And if that's what she's talking about,

230
00:11:29.799 --> 00:11:32.840
<v Speaker 3>redoubling that effort to just sort of sweep aside what

231
00:11:32.879 --> 00:11:35.320
<v Speaker 3>people in particular communities want and say, we're doing it

232
00:11:35.320 --> 00:11:37.480
<v Speaker 3>from Washington. We're telling you what in Idaho you got

233
00:11:37.480 --> 00:11:41.919
<v Speaker 3>to have in your neighborhood. That's again, dare I say

234
00:11:41.960 --> 00:11:45.480
<v Speaker 3>I get the idea that she's in favor of expansion

235
00:11:45.600 --> 00:11:48.440
<v Speaker 3>of the state that maybe just me.

236
00:11:48.759 --> 00:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, just could you have gotten that idea, James, Look,

237
00:11:51.679 --> 00:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the land thing, I mean, the talk of bringing back

238
00:11:54.000 --> 00:11:56.799
<v Speaker 1>price controls. Let's be clear, that's what she's really talking about.

239
00:11:57.080 --> 00:11:59.039
<v Speaker 1>That's a bad idea we thought we'd gotten rid of

240
00:11:59.120 --> 00:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for the last time in the seventies. You may remember, James,

241
00:12:02.200 --> 00:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I know you follow these things. I know the history

242
00:12:04.000 --> 00:12:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of it. There was a push back in the mid

243
00:12:05.919 --> 00:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>seventies at the time of price controls to have the

244
00:12:08.879 --> 00:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>federal government get directly involved with local zoning. In other words,

245
00:12:12.600 --> 00:12:14.279
<v Speaker 1>weren't just going to leave it to states and cities.

246
00:12:14.320 --> 00:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there were bills in Congress that was

247
00:12:16.399 --> 00:12:18.639
<v Speaker 1>back on the palmy days of the Clean Air Act

248
00:12:18.639 --> 00:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>and the Clean Water Act and all the other national

249
00:12:20.759 --> 00:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>legislation we passed after the First Earth Day, and you

250
00:12:24.240 --> 00:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>know it got shot down in Congress because of massive

251
00:12:26.639 --> 00:12:29.279
<v Speaker 1>resistance by the states and local governments and the home

252
00:12:29.320 --> 00:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>building industry and others.

253
00:12:30.480 --> 00:12:31.080
<v Speaker 3>But I wouldn't be.

254
00:12:31.120 --> 00:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>All surprised if we're there have been sort of backed

255
00:12:33.759 --> 00:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>or ways to try and coerce states and cities for

256
00:12:36.120 --> 00:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a while now. But I wouldn't be surprised if we

257
00:12:38.679 --> 00:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>did not see from the Harris administration a brand new

258
00:12:41.120 --> 00:12:44.799
<v Speaker 1>initiative to get the federal government directly involved in local

259
00:12:44.919 --> 00:12:45.759
<v Speaker 1>zoning decisions.

260
00:12:46.159 --> 00:12:48.960
<v Speaker 5>I just think it's worth saying that this line that

261
00:12:49.000 --> 00:12:51.480
<v Speaker 5>I've started to see that Kamala Harris is some sort

262
00:12:51.519 --> 00:12:57.919
<v Speaker 5>of yimbi yes in my backyard is ridiculous because the

263
00:12:57.919 --> 00:13:01.600
<v Speaker 5>primary reason that the demo crowds are struggling on this

264
00:13:01.840 --> 00:13:05.480
<v Speaker 5>issue is that there are a whole host of interest

265
00:13:05.559 --> 00:13:10.960
<v Speaker 5>groups on whom they rely that stand in the way

266
00:13:11.120 --> 00:13:15.960
<v Speaker 5>of the production of new homes and development more generally,

267
00:13:16.080 --> 00:13:24.080
<v Speaker 5>and those are environmental groups, unions of various sorts, and

268
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:29.399
<v Speaker 5>other left wing interest groups that don't like development for

269
00:13:29.559 --> 00:13:30.519
<v Speaker 5>various reasons.

270
00:13:30.840 --> 00:13:32.679
<v Speaker 3>And this is a.

271
00:13:35.320 --> 00:13:40.480
<v Speaker 5>Problem that will only be solved when a Democrat stands

272
00:13:40.559 --> 00:13:43.960
<v Speaker 5>up and says to those people, no, it is more

273
00:13:44.039 --> 00:13:47.360
<v Speaker 5>important for us to fix this on the supply side

274
00:13:47.360 --> 00:13:49.039
<v Speaker 5>than it is for you to get what you want.

275
00:13:49.480 --> 00:13:53.600
<v Speaker 5>And I just don't see any evidence that this is happening.

276
00:13:53.720 --> 00:13:59.720
<v Speaker 5>If you read left leaning self professed wonks in the

277
00:14:00.039 --> 00:14:05.320
<v Speaker 5>United States, you will see that they are aware, especially

278
00:14:05.360 --> 00:14:09.519
<v Speaker 5>in California, New York, that they have an issue here,

279
00:14:10.320 --> 00:14:13.919
<v Speaker 5>but they don't really know how to fix it, because

280
00:14:14.279 --> 00:14:19.799
<v Speaker 5>the internal politics within the party makes fixing it really tough.

281
00:14:20.600 --> 00:14:24.639
<v Speaker 5>And I just see nothing in the history of Kamala

282
00:14:24.679 --> 00:14:30.399
<v Speaker 5>Harris's life of public role that suggests that she has

283
00:14:30.720 --> 00:14:33.480
<v Speaker 5>an interest in doing that whatsoever, Which is why, in

284
00:14:33.519 --> 00:14:37.840
<v Speaker 5>addition to saying all of these things that some reformers

285
00:14:37.879 --> 00:14:40.519
<v Speaker 5>have said are encouraging, she said, I'm going to give

286
00:14:40.519 --> 00:14:43.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty five thousand dollars to anyone who's by, because that's

287
00:14:43.559 --> 00:14:46.960
<v Speaker 5>actually something that won't be upsetting to the people she

288
00:14:47.039 --> 00:14:48.960
<v Speaker 5>needs to win the election and keep on side.

289
00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:49.840
<v Speaker 6>Right.

290
00:14:50.320 --> 00:14:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, I think that's all very unfair, Charlie. We

291
00:14:52.360 --> 00:14:53.919
<v Speaker 3>know that she curls up at night with a glass

292
00:14:53.919 --> 00:14:55.799
<v Speaker 3>of wine in a copy of Shane Jacob's Life in

293
00:14:55.840 --> 00:14:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Different of the Cities. Just deeply interesting, a great book

294
00:14:58.159 --> 00:15:01.879
<v Speaker 3>and developed the progress it is, indeed, But that's another podcast.

295
00:15:01.960 --> 00:15:06.480
<v Speaker 3>In this podcast, we bring you Andy McCarthy. Andy McCarthy,

296
00:15:06.519 --> 00:15:09.200
<v Speaker 3>We're proud to do so again, senior fellow the National

297
00:15:09.240 --> 00:15:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Review Institute and a contributing editor there as well as

298
00:15:12.000 --> 00:15:16.320
<v Speaker 3>at Fox News. Andy, welcome back. Breaking news, right, Hi.

299
00:15:16.399 --> 00:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Jans, how are you good? Yes, breaking news. Trump is

300
00:15:20.240 --> 00:15:25.000
<v Speaker 2>trying to get his sentencing in the Manhattan case postponed

301
00:15:25.799 --> 00:15:30.200
<v Speaker 2>by moving again in federal court to have the state

302
00:15:30.279 --> 00:15:35.639
<v Speaker 2>proceeding removed there, that is, to have the federal court

303
00:15:35.679 --> 00:15:37.519
<v Speaker 2>take jurisdiction over it.

304
00:15:38.159 --> 00:15:38.960
<v Speaker 6>And the point of.

305
00:15:38.919 --> 00:15:45.559
<v Speaker 2>This is there's now a profound immunity question in connection

306
00:15:45.679 --> 00:15:50.480
<v Speaker 2>with Braggs prosecution, and immunity is supposed to be litigated

307
00:15:50.759 --> 00:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>whether Trump wins it or not as a different matter,

308
00:15:53.480 --> 00:15:58.360
<v Speaker 2>but immunity is supposed to be litigated through appeal before

309
00:15:58.440 --> 00:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>other proceedings in the case happen. And that's obvious enough

310
00:16:02.879 --> 00:16:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that even Alvin Bragg, the District Attorney of Manhattan who

311
00:16:08.720 --> 00:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>brought the case, has conceded that there should be a postponement.

312
00:16:14.279 --> 00:16:19.039
<v Speaker 2>At this point, sentencing is supposed to happen on September eighteenth.

313
00:16:19.639 --> 00:16:24.399
<v Speaker 2>For whatever reason, Judge Merchon, who has been I think

314
00:16:24.519 --> 00:16:29.639
<v Speaker 2>credibly accused of being biased against the defense in this case,

315
00:16:30.120 --> 00:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>has not acted on the motion to postpone the sentencing,

316
00:16:35.440 --> 00:16:39.480
<v Speaker 2>even though the prosecutor agrees that it should be postponed.

317
00:16:40.159 --> 00:16:42.399
<v Speaker 2>And the way this is teed up at the moment,

318
00:16:43.799 --> 00:16:46.879
<v Speaker 2>merch On has said that he'll rule on Trump's immunity

319
00:16:46.919 --> 00:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>claim on September sixteenth, and then proceed to sentence him

320
00:16:51.279 --> 00:16:56.759
<v Speaker 2>on September eighteenth, which certainly suggests that he's trying to

321
00:16:56.840 --> 00:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>frustrate Trump's appellate rights by not giving him enough time

322
00:17:00.799 --> 00:17:04.519
<v Speaker 2>to get to another court to stop the sentencing from

323
00:17:04.839 --> 00:17:08.559
<v Speaker 2>going forward until the immunities decided. So they're going to

324
00:17:08.599 --> 00:17:11.440
<v Speaker 2>federal court at this point now to try to make

325
00:17:11.480 --> 00:17:11.960
<v Speaker 2>them act.

326
00:17:12.759 --> 00:17:14.839
<v Speaker 3>Before I hand it over to Stephen and Charles. I

327
00:17:14.880 --> 00:17:16.759
<v Speaker 3>just want to bring everybody up to speed, because memories

328
00:17:16.799 --> 00:17:19.599
<v Speaker 3>are short. Remind everybody what Trump fell for in this case.

329
00:17:20.079 --> 00:17:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I use fell in the old dragnet sense of having

330
00:17:23.759 --> 00:17:24.519
<v Speaker 3>been found guilty.

331
00:17:25.640 --> 00:17:28.559
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, this is a very strange case. You know.

332
00:17:28.640 --> 00:17:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I think there's some really strong allegations against Trump that

333
00:17:33.240 --> 00:17:34.559
<v Speaker 2>come out of the law fair stuff.

334
00:17:34.599 --> 00:17:36.279
<v Speaker 6>This case is just a joke.

335
00:17:37.640 --> 00:17:44.039
<v Speaker 2>He was accused in thirty four counts of falsifying his

336
00:17:44.240 --> 00:17:50.480
<v Speaker 2>business records in order to conceal a second crime. Ordinarily,

337
00:17:50.519 --> 00:17:54.920
<v Speaker 2>in New York, nobody gets prosecuted for these kinds of offenses,

338
00:17:54.960 --> 00:18:00.599
<v Speaker 2>particularly under Bragg, who is like a textbook progressive prosecutor. Ordinarily,

339
00:18:00.759 --> 00:18:06.359
<v Speaker 2>business records offenses are misdemeanors. These misdemeanors happened, I think

340
00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:12.359
<v Speaker 2>now twenty seventeen, so seven years ago. The statute of

341
00:18:12.440 --> 00:18:17.920
<v Speaker 2>limitations on misdemeanors is two years. By alleging that Trump

342
00:18:18.039 --> 00:18:21.680
<v Speaker 2>was trying to conceal a second defense, he got it

343
00:18:22.240 --> 00:18:26.519
<v Speaker 2>inflated from a misdemeanor to a felony and thereby did

344
00:18:26.559 --> 00:18:32.319
<v Speaker 2>an end around the misdemeanor statute of limitations. And then

345
00:18:32.359 --> 00:18:35.880
<v Speaker 2>he carved this one transaction into thirty four by basically

346
00:18:36.319 --> 00:18:39.960
<v Speaker 2>taking each piece of paper that was involved in the

347
00:18:40.000 --> 00:18:43.519
<v Speaker 2>payments that occurred here and charging it as a separate felony,

348
00:18:43.519 --> 00:18:45.799
<v Speaker 2>which totals up to I think one hundred and thirty

349
00:18:45.839 --> 00:18:50.440
<v Speaker 2>four or one hundred and thirty six years of criminal exposure.

350
00:18:50.599 --> 00:18:52.559
<v Speaker 2>It's capped at twenty in New York, but that's still

351
00:18:52.599 --> 00:18:58.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of a lot of penalty. So that's the crime,

352
00:18:58.680 --> 00:19:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and I think the outrage, well, there's a lot of

353
00:19:00.759 --> 00:19:04.079
<v Speaker 2>outrage about the case, but the worst part of it

354
00:19:04.119 --> 00:19:07.680
<v Speaker 2>is that the judge did not require the jury to

355
00:19:07.799 --> 00:19:11.319
<v Speaker 2>find beyond a reasonable doubt what the second crime was

356
00:19:12.480 --> 00:19:19.599
<v Speaker 2>because the judge misinterpreted the law of conspiracy. What Bragg

357
00:19:19.680 --> 00:19:23.559
<v Speaker 2>relied on as the so called second crime was a

358
00:19:23.720 --> 00:19:29.599
<v Speaker 2>New York election law conspiracy to influence an election.

359
00:19:31.079 --> 00:19:32.440
<v Speaker 6>By unlawful conduct.

360
00:19:33.000 --> 00:19:36.799
<v Speaker 2>And therefore Bragg said, as long as the jury finds

361
00:19:36.839 --> 00:19:40.240
<v Speaker 2>beyond a reasonable doubt that he conspired to influence the election,

362
00:19:41.000 --> 00:19:42.200
<v Speaker 2>then that's sufficient.

363
00:19:42.400 --> 00:19:44.759
<v Speaker 6>So we don't have to figure out what.

364
00:19:46.079 --> 00:19:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Unlawful conduct he agreed to participate in.

365
00:19:50.880 --> 00:19:52.160
<v Speaker 6>And the problem with that.

366
00:19:52.119 --> 00:19:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Is in conspiracy law, first of all, it's not a

367
00:19:55.920 --> 00:19:57.519
<v Speaker 2>crime to influence an election.

368
00:19:57.640 --> 00:20:00.240
<v Speaker 6>That's what campaigns try to do.

369
00:20:00.400 --> 00:20:02.759
<v Speaker 2>What makes it a crime, What makes it a conspiracy

370
00:20:03.359 --> 00:20:05.839
<v Speaker 2>is the agreement, the meeting of the minds by two

371
00:20:06.000 --> 00:20:09.559
<v Speaker 2>or more people on the criminal objective. So you can't

372
00:20:09.640 --> 00:20:12.880
<v Speaker 2>have a conspiracy in the criminal law unless the jury

373
00:20:12.880 --> 00:20:16.079
<v Speaker 2>agrees beyond a reasonable doubt on what the statute, the

374
00:20:16.119 --> 00:20:21.440
<v Speaker 2>criminal statute the crime that makes it a conspiracy. Otherwise,

375
00:20:21.519 --> 00:20:24.160
<v Speaker 2>if it's just an agreement to influence the election, that's

376
00:20:24.200 --> 00:20:25.400
<v Speaker 2>not criminal.

377
00:20:25.519 --> 00:20:28.640
<v Speaker 6>So there's a lot of problems with the case.

378
00:20:29.079 --> 00:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, any it's Steve Hayward who said a couple of

379
00:20:32.480 --> 00:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>days ago, why don't we have Andy here since so

380
00:20:34.240 --> 00:20:37.319
<v Speaker 1>much legal news is breaking this week, and it turns

381
00:20:37.319 --> 00:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>out to be timely. Look my summary for lay persons,

382
00:20:41.000 --> 00:20:42.799
<v Speaker 1>which I think as a lawyer you may find a

383
00:20:42.799 --> 00:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>little too cute, which was they try to elevate a

384
00:20:45.519 --> 00:20:49.279
<v Speaker 1>misdemeanor jaywalking into a felony by first counting every step

385
00:20:49.319 --> 00:20:52.559
<v Speaker 1>taken across the road as a separate felony, and two

386
00:20:52.839 --> 00:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>saying once the person reached the other side the road,

387
00:20:55.200 --> 00:20:57.519
<v Speaker 1>he was either gonna mug somebody or rob a liquor store.

388
00:20:57.519 --> 00:20:59.559
<v Speaker 1>And you can decide which crime you think the person

389
00:20:59.680 --> 00:21:03.759
<v Speaker 1>was going to. I mean, that's silly to me, But

390
00:21:03.799 --> 00:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>then the other I don't want to I still have

391
00:21:05.880 --> 00:21:08.079
<v Speaker 1>a question about the appellate process. But the other big

392
00:21:08.119 --> 00:21:11.279
<v Speaker 1>story that first brought you our attention again was Jack

393
00:21:11.319 --> 00:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Smith introducing a new set of indictments against Trump for

394
00:21:16.240 --> 00:21:20.599
<v Speaker 1>election interference. And I'm it just took my breath away.

395
00:21:20.720 --> 00:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I thought even this Justice Department would at

396
00:21:24.000 --> 00:21:26.279
<v Speaker 1>this point say it's too late based on their rules.

397
00:21:26.319 --> 00:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I know there's some ambiguity about whether it's a sixty

398
00:21:28.319 --> 00:21:30.799
<v Speaker 1>day deadline or a ninety day deadline ahead of the election,

399
00:21:31.119 --> 00:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that you do not bring a case against somebody who's

400
00:21:34.039 --> 00:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>up in an election or a political figure. But they've

401
00:21:36.680 --> 00:21:39.839
<v Speaker 1>gone ahead and done this here, and I'm simply it

402
00:21:39.880 --> 00:21:41.559
<v Speaker 1>takes my breath away that they would do this. It

403
00:21:41.599 --> 00:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>seems politically reckless, but then also the legal grounds. I

404
00:21:45.359 --> 00:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't quite figured out the legal grounds yet, So why

405
00:21:47.200 --> 00:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>don't you comment or say your own thoughts on what's

406
00:21:49.680 --> 00:21:52.279
<v Speaker 1>going on there and whether I'm right that it's politically

407
00:21:52.519 --> 00:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>reckless or legally dubious.

408
00:21:54.640 --> 00:22:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Steve, I'm a pretty strong critic of Smith, but

409
00:22:01.319 --> 00:22:05.200
<v Speaker 2>in this particular, I think he's getting a bad rap.

410
00:22:05.440 --> 00:22:07.359
<v Speaker 6>So let me explain why.

411
00:22:07.480 --> 00:22:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, so we all know the Supreme Court didn't

412
00:22:12.519 --> 00:22:16.799
<v Speaker 2>throw out the election interference case in the immunity decision, right.

413
00:22:16.920 --> 00:22:21.079
<v Speaker 2>What they said is that Judge Chuckkin, who was the

414
00:22:21.119 --> 00:22:26.440
<v Speaker 2>presiding judge Obama appointee in Washington, was supposed to get

415
00:22:26.440 --> 00:22:30.319
<v Speaker 2>input from the parties and do an exacting examination of

416
00:22:30.359 --> 00:22:35.559
<v Speaker 2>the indictment in order to determine which acts are official

417
00:22:35.599 --> 00:22:39.440
<v Speaker 2>presidential acts that would be amenable of an immunity claim

418
00:22:39.920 --> 00:22:42.920
<v Speaker 2>and which conduct that's alleged in the indictment is private

419
00:22:43.000 --> 00:22:46.839
<v Speaker 2>and could be grisk for a criminal prosecution. So she

420
00:22:47.079 --> 00:22:50.680
<v Speaker 2>wanted to have Smith weigh in on that issue and

421
00:22:50.759 --> 00:22:55.680
<v Speaker 2>originally directed him to do so on August ninth, he

422
00:22:55.799 --> 00:23:01.079
<v Speaker 2>asked for a three week delay, and the interesting reason

423
00:23:01.119 --> 00:23:03.759
<v Speaker 2>why he asks for a three week delay is this

424
00:23:03.799 --> 00:23:07.599
<v Speaker 2>is a dilemma for the Justice Department. Ordinarily, the Justice

425
00:23:07.599 --> 00:23:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Department's job is to defend the executive branch. So the

426
00:23:11.920 --> 00:23:15.559
<v Speaker 2>immunity ruling by the Supreme Court is a godsend to

427
00:23:15.680 --> 00:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>doj because in the future they will be able to

428
00:23:18.480 --> 00:23:23.039
<v Speaker 2>use it to very expansively argue that presidents have immunity.

429
00:23:23.920 --> 00:23:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Smith's case cuts against that. So anything that Smith does

430
00:23:27.759 --> 00:23:31.279
<v Speaker 2>to try to argue that the presumption of immunity can

431
00:23:31.319 --> 00:23:36.200
<v Speaker 2>be overcome in his case creates potentially a precedent that's

432
00:23:36.240 --> 00:23:39.599
<v Speaker 2>going to hurt the Justice Department in the future. And

433
00:23:39.640 --> 00:23:42.799
<v Speaker 2>therefore it's not just a matter of the Trump prosecution.

434
00:23:43.359 --> 00:23:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Everybody in the Justice Department needs to get on board

435
00:23:46.480 --> 00:23:49.920
<v Speaker 2>about what they think this decision means, which is why

436
00:23:49.920 --> 00:23:53.960
<v Speaker 2>he has for the delay. Obviously, August thirtieth is today.

437
00:23:54.039 --> 00:23:57.319
<v Speaker 2>This would have been the day that Smith had to file.

438
00:23:57.960 --> 00:24:03.119
<v Speaker 2>So if Smith had simply done what Chuckkins said, he

439
00:24:03.160 --> 00:24:06.799
<v Speaker 2>would have been providing this week his vision of what

440
00:24:07.160 --> 00:24:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the case is going to look like. That is what

441
00:24:09.480 --> 00:24:12.759
<v Speaker 2>things can still be prosecuted and what things Trump has

442
00:24:12.799 --> 00:24:17.039
<v Speaker 2>immunity for. Instead, what he did was what I would

443
00:24:17.079 --> 00:24:20.079
<v Speaker 2>have done, which is I don't want to consult with

444
00:24:20.160 --> 00:24:22.759
<v Speaker 2>the court and the defense about what the case looks like.

445
00:24:22.839 --> 00:24:25.440
<v Speaker 2>And the one advantage I have as a prosecutor is

446
00:24:25.799 --> 00:24:27.279
<v Speaker 2>I can rewrite the indictment.

447
00:24:28.200 --> 00:24:29.119
<v Speaker 6>And that's what he did.

448
00:24:29.759 --> 00:24:33.039
<v Speaker 2>But all he did in rewriting the indictment is strip

449
00:24:33.119 --> 00:24:37.200
<v Speaker 2>out the allegations that the Supreme Court said he can't

450
00:24:37.400 --> 00:24:41.400
<v Speaker 2>run with, which is mainly Trump's control over the Justice Department,

451
00:24:41.440 --> 00:24:45.680
<v Speaker 2>and to the extent that that piece of the indictment

452
00:24:47.400 --> 00:24:50.599
<v Speaker 2>further the schemes that are alleged. So the four crimes

453
00:24:51.000 --> 00:24:53.400
<v Speaker 2>that are in the new indictment are exactly the same

454
00:24:54.319 --> 00:24:56.119
<v Speaker 2>as the original indictment.

455
00:24:56.400 --> 00:24:58.000
<v Speaker 6>And the only thing he's done.

456
00:24:57.799 --> 00:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Is strip out the stuff the Supreme Court told him

457
00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:03.119
<v Speaker 2>I had to be stripped out. But whether he had

458
00:25:03.200 --> 00:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>done this by making a submission on Friday or done

459
00:25:07.240 --> 00:25:10.079
<v Speaker 2>it by filing a superseding indictment on Tuesday, it's the

460
00:25:10.119 --> 00:25:12.000
<v Speaker 2>same thing one way or the other.

461
00:25:12.839 --> 00:25:19.880
<v Speaker 5>So Andy in the bragcase, it was assumed before the

462
00:25:19.920 --> 00:25:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Supreme Court weighed in on the immunity question, once Trump

463
00:25:23.200 --> 00:25:26.720
<v Speaker 5>had been found guilty, that there would be a sentencing,

464
00:25:27.000 --> 00:25:30.480
<v Speaker 5>and it was possible that Trump could go to jail

465
00:25:30.880 --> 00:25:36.480
<v Speaker 5>while he was running for president, and the question got

466
00:25:36.519 --> 00:25:40.319
<v Speaker 5>a bit scrambled, partly because of the immunity case and

467
00:25:40.359 --> 00:25:43.759
<v Speaker 5>then a few other legal developments. So my question is,

468
00:25:44.599 --> 00:25:50.279
<v Speaker 5>given the changes that you described in your first answer,

469
00:25:51.079 --> 00:25:54.039
<v Speaker 5>what is most likely to happen next in the brag case?

470
00:25:54.079 --> 00:25:55.960
<v Speaker 5>And if there's no way of telling what's most likely,

471
00:25:56.039 --> 00:25:59.279
<v Speaker 5>what are the options in the next, say, six months

472
00:25:59.359 --> 00:25:59.839
<v Speaker 5>to a year.

473
00:26:00.799 --> 00:26:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, Charlie, I think Bragg wanted to press ahead

474
00:26:05.119 --> 00:26:09.799
<v Speaker 2>with the sentencing because he knows that Trump is not

475
00:26:10.039 --> 00:26:14.759
<v Speaker 2>actually going to prison, and I think kind of almost perversely,

476
00:26:15.200 --> 00:26:18.559
<v Speaker 2>that incentivizes him to give Trump an even more stiff

477
00:26:18.599 --> 00:26:21.920
<v Speaker 2>sentence than he would otherwise have given him, because what's

478
00:26:21.960 --> 00:26:24.079
<v Speaker 2>going to happen here. This is a non violent crime.

479
00:26:24.160 --> 00:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump is not going It's not like he's going to

480
00:26:26.039 --> 00:26:29.680
<v Speaker 2>get carted off to rikers the second that march On

481
00:26:30.000 --> 00:26:32.880
<v Speaker 2>imposted sentence. But what they've always wanted out of this

482
00:26:33.039 --> 00:26:35.599
<v Speaker 2>case was for the Democrats to be able to say

483
00:26:35.640 --> 00:26:39.200
<v Speaker 2>he's a convicted felon facing a stiff prison sentence in

484
00:26:39.240 --> 00:26:41.160
<v Speaker 2>the run up to the election, and they would have

485
00:26:41.200 --> 00:26:46.000
<v Speaker 2>that the problem legally that they now have, and this

486
00:26:46.119 --> 00:26:51.359
<v Speaker 2>is a I think reckless and certainly gratuitous presentation of

487
00:26:51.400 --> 00:26:58.079
<v Speaker 2>the case by Bragg. They didn't need the Trump presidential

488
00:26:58.119 --> 00:27:01.200
<v Speaker 2>acts as evidence in the trial. They could easily have

489
00:27:01.319 --> 00:27:03.519
<v Speaker 2>proved up what was charged to the indictment by just

490
00:27:03.559 --> 00:27:07.319
<v Speaker 2>sticking with employees of the Trump organization and the testimony

491
00:27:07.359 --> 00:27:11.480
<v Speaker 2>of Colin and called it a day. Instead, what they

492
00:27:11.519 --> 00:27:15.480
<v Speaker 2>did was they called two of Trump's White House staffers

493
00:27:15.519 --> 00:27:19.960
<v Speaker 2>to testify about his customary with the way he ran

494
00:27:20.000 --> 00:27:22.759
<v Speaker 2>the White House, you know, the way he conducted himself

495
00:27:22.759 --> 00:27:25.720
<v Speaker 2>as president, etc. Bragg is now in the position of

496
00:27:25.759 --> 00:27:28.519
<v Speaker 2>trying to argue that that was just harmless error, but

497
00:27:28.599 --> 00:27:34.839
<v Speaker 2>when his prosecutors summed up to the jury, they described

498
00:27:34.920 --> 00:27:38.400
<v Speaker 2>it as devastating proof of kilt. So he's got a

499
00:27:38.440 --> 00:27:40.559
<v Speaker 2>tough time saying it was harmless error at this point.

500
00:27:40.799 --> 00:27:42.759
<v Speaker 2>The other thing he did that I think was pretty

501
00:27:42.799 --> 00:27:47.880
<v Speaker 2>outrageous was he had Cohen testify that Trump had told

502
00:27:48.000 --> 00:27:52.319
<v Speaker 2>him that Jeff Sessions would make the Federal Election Commission

503
00:27:52.759 --> 00:27:59.039
<v Speaker 2>investigation of the non disclosure agreements go away. There's no

504
00:27:59.400 --> 00:28:03.559
<v Speaker 2>corrobore evidence that that happened, but it's important evidence, even

505
00:28:03.559 --> 00:28:07.720
<v Speaker 2>though it was fleeting, because Bragg didn't make it prove

506
00:28:07.880 --> 00:28:11.440
<v Speaker 2>anything that would indicate to anyone that Trump was even

507
00:28:11.640 --> 00:28:16.039
<v Speaker 2>thinking about federal election law, much less that he was

508
00:28:16.119 --> 00:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>willful beyond a reasonable doubt in conspiring to violate it.

509
00:28:20.119 --> 00:28:24.519
<v Speaker 6>Right, So this was all stuff that Bragg threw.

510
00:28:24.359 --> 00:28:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Into the case that he didn't need and didn't have

511
00:28:26.759 --> 00:28:29.480
<v Speaker 2>any business in the case. And at the same time,

512
00:28:29.559 --> 00:28:33.119
<v Speaker 2>they proved that they knew that the Supreme Court was

513
00:28:33.200 --> 00:28:38.319
<v Speaker 2>considering immunity and that the oral argument had happened, and

514
00:28:38.440 --> 00:28:41.160
<v Speaker 2>during the oral argument a number of the justices had

515
00:28:41.160 --> 00:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>seemed to be sympathetic to Trump's position. Yet they kept

516
00:28:45.960 --> 00:28:49.200
<v Speaker 2>insisting to Brag that there was no presidential immunity and

517
00:28:49.279 --> 00:28:53.680
<v Speaker 2>certainly no derivative evidentiary privilege not to have proof of

518
00:28:53.720 --> 00:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>presidential acts come into a criminal trial. So Bragg understands

519
00:28:59.039 --> 00:29:02.359
<v Speaker 2>now that he's stuck with having made this decision. There

520
00:29:02.599 --> 00:29:05.839
<v Speaker 2>was proof of presidential acts that came into the trial,

521
00:29:06.240 --> 00:29:09.880
<v Speaker 2>which if they had just waited until the Supreme Court

522
00:29:10.000 --> 00:29:13.680
<v Speaker 2>ruled as Trump's lawyers asked them to, the judge would

523
00:29:13.680 --> 00:29:15.759
<v Speaker 2>have known, you can't let that evidence into the case.

524
00:29:15.799 --> 00:29:18.200
<v Speaker 2>But he let it into the case. So that gives

525
00:29:18.240 --> 00:29:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump a strong immunity claim. Now Trump is not going

526
00:29:22.000 --> 00:29:24.200
<v Speaker 2>to win his ultimate claim, Trump is saying that the

527
00:29:24.240 --> 00:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>indictment should get dismissed. I think ultimately what the courts

528
00:29:28.920 --> 00:29:33.759
<v Speaker 2>will probably decide here is that the guilty verdicts need

529
00:29:33.839 --> 00:29:36.279
<v Speaker 2>to be vacated, and if Bragg wants to try him

530
00:29:36.319 --> 00:29:38.519
<v Speaker 2>again at some point, he can try him again.

531
00:29:38.559 --> 00:29:40.960
<v Speaker 6>I don't think they're going to throw out the.

532
00:29:40.799 --> 00:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Case on a ruling that couldn't be that would end

533
00:29:46.039 --> 00:29:47.079
<v Speaker 2>the case completely.

534
00:29:47.240 --> 00:29:48.960
<v Speaker 6>It'll be up to brag whether he wants to bring

535
00:29:49.000 --> 00:29:50.440
<v Speaker 6>it again. That's what I think will happen.

536
00:29:50.720 --> 00:29:53.480
<v Speaker 2>But this is going to take a long time to

537
00:29:53.559 --> 00:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>play out because it seems to me that merch On

538
00:29:56.759 --> 00:29:59.759
<v Speaker 2>being merch On, and we've seen the way he's performed

539
00:29:59.839 --> 00:30:02.079
<v Speaker 2>the whole time he's had this case. He's going to

540
00:30:02.160 --> 00:30:06.240
<v Speaker 2>rule against Trump on the immunity, and then I think

541
00:30:06.240 --> 00:30:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump is entitled if that, If that's the state of play,

542
00:30:10.400 --> 00:30:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Trump is entitled to go to the appellate division first,

543
00:30:14.480 --> 00:30:18.759
<v Speaker 2>and before brad can before merchand consentence him. He should

544
00:30:18.759 --> 00:30:21.000
<v Speaker 2>be able to go to the appellate division and litigate

545
00:30:21.319 --> 00:30:24.960
<v Speaker 2>the immunity because immunity is supposed to be decided first.

546
00:30:25.319 --> 00:30:29.680
<v Speaker 2>What Trump is trying to do now is circumvent the

547
00:30:29.720 --> 00:30:32.599
<v Speaker 2>process of going through the New York appellate courts and

548
00:30:32.799 --> 00:30:36.079
<v Speaker 2>just get the case brought back to federal court again,

549
00:30:36.559 --> 00:30:40.200
<v Speaker 2>and have at the very least have a federal judge

550
00:30:40.240 --> 00:30:46.240
<v Speaker 2>tell merch On he can't impose sentence until immunity is litigated.

551
00:30:46.319 --> 00:30:46.960
<v Speaker 6>To the ground.

552
00:30:47.319 --> 00:30:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I think Trump would rather if he could litigate the

553
00:30:50.759 --> 00:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>immunity in federal court rather than in the New York courts.

554
00:30:54.039 --> 00:30:57.359
<v Speaker 2>But at a minimum, and his immediate objective here is

555
00:30:57.359 --> 00:30:58.960
<v Speaker 2>to get the sentencing postpone.

556
00:30:59.000 --> 00:31:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, well, now, Andy, it quick jurisdictional question here, sort

557
00:31:02.279 --> 00:31:05.119
<v Speaker 1>of law one on one. It's usually not simple to

558
00:31:05.200 --> 00:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>jump from state to federal court. The federal courts don't

559
00:31:08.000 --> 00:31:10.079
<v Speaker 1>like to admit you until you've exhausted all the state

560
00:31:10.200 --> 00:31:12.799
<v Speaker 1>courts and so forth. So But on the other hand,

561
00:31:13.680 --> 00:31:17.319
<v Speaker 1>I can I mean on political grounds. I can see

562
00:31:17.319 --> 00:31:19.079
<v Speaker 1>some federal judge saying, hey, wait a minute, this is

563
00:31:19.119 --> 00:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>out of hand. Maybe one way of asking is this

564
00:31:23.240 --> 00:31:26.119
<v Speaker 1>is judge merch On's I think pretty obvious bias is

565
00:31:26.160 --> 00:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that sufficient grounds legal grounds for a federal judge to

566
00:31:30.240 --> 00:31:32.759
<v Speaker 1>leap frog of state courts and search jurisdiction.

567
00:31:33.880 --> 00:31:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Not in and of itself, but and there's always a

568
00:31:37.640 --> 00:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>butt when you have me on, right, and there's a

569
00:31:39.240 --> 00:31:44.279
<v Speaker 2>butt to the butt. So if it was just if

570
00:31:44.319 --> 00:31:47.599
<v Speaker 2>the only claim here was biased by merch on, that

571
00:31:47.640 --> 00:31:49.960
<v Speaker 2>would be one of the bundle of things that happens

572
00:31:49.960 --> 00:31:53.400
<v Speaker 2>in a criminal case that all goes up on appeal together.

573
00:31:53.680 --> 00:31:56.319
<v Speaker 6>Right, There are a handful.

574
00:31:55.759 --> 00:32:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Of issues in criminal law that have to be decided

575
00:32:00.480 --> 00:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>before anything else happens in the case because they go

576
00:32:04.759 --> 00:32:07.640
<v Speaker 2>to the legitimacy of the preceding itself. In other words,

577
00:32:07.680 --> 00:32:13.720
<v Speaker 2>if you have immunity, the constitutional offense is not convicting you,

578
00:32:14.200 --> 00:32:15.759
<v Speaker 2>it's trying you in the first place.

579
00:32:15.799 --> 00:32:18.240
<v Speaker 6>You have a right not to be tried. Right, So

580
00:32:18.599 --> 00:32:19.880
<v Speaker 6>there's a handful of these issues.

581
00:32:19.920 --> 00:32:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Immunity and double jeopardy are the ones that come immediately

582
00:32:23.480 --> 00:32:27.839
<v Speaker 2>to mind. Where those actually are issues that you are

583
00:32:27.880 --> 00:32:31.559
<v Speaker 2>allowed to have what's called an interlocatory appeal on. That is,

584
00:32:31.759 --> 00:32:33.559
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to wait till the end of the

585
00:32:33.599 --> 00:32:34.920
<v Speaker 2>proceedings in the trial court.

586
00:32:35.160 --> 00:32:36.680
<v Speaker 6>You get to appeal those immediately.

587
00:32:37.119 --> 00:32:41.240
<v Speaker 2>So because for two reasons, Steve, One because this is

588
00:32:41.279 --> 00:32:45.960
<v Speaker 2>an immunity issue, and two because it's a question of

589
00:32:46.880 --> 00:32:54.119
<v Speaker 2>a state prosecuting a federal official. Arguably in connection with

590
00:32:54.759 --> 00:32:59.559
<v Speaker 2>activities in furtherance of his federal responsibilities.

591
00:32:59.680 --> 00:33:00.519
<v Speaker 6>I think got it.

592
00:33:00.599 --> 00:33:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Brad should have been able to obviate the second one

593
00:33:04.400 --> 00:33:07.200
<v Speaker 2>by saying, look, I'm not proving any of his federal activities.

594
00:33:07.200 --> 00:33:09.759
<v Speaker 6>This is strictly private. But he went there. He shouldn't

595
00:33:09.759 --> 00:33:10.279
<v Speaker 6>have gone there.

596
00:33:10.759 --> 00:33:14.920
<v Speaker 2>And on that Congress has had, i think since sometime

597
00:33:15.480 --> 00:33:19.680
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteenth century, a removal statute on the books

598
00:33:20.039 --> 00:33:23.599
<v Speaker 2>that is pretty forgiving that allows federal if a federal

599
00:33:23.640 --> 00:33:28.680
<v Speaker 2>official is charged with a state crime and the federal

600
00:33:28.720 --> 00:33:33.480
<v Speaker 2>official can argue that he's being prosecuted for the furtherance

601
00:33:33.480 --> 00:33:36.920
<v Speaker 2>of his federal duties or and this is usually end

602
00:33:37.039 --> 00:33:40.440
<v Speaker 2>actually that he has a federal defense to the charge,

603
00:33:40.839 --> 00:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that case is supposed to be removed out of state

604
00:33:43.200 --> 00:33:45.319
<v Speaker 2>court and brought into federal court.

605
00:33:45.799 --> 00:33:47.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, this reminds me. I was gonna I'm going

606
00:33:47.839 --> 00:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask you a political question a minute, but this

607
00:33:50.039 --> 00:33:51.559
<v Speaker 1>is starting to remind me a little bit of an

608
00:33:51.559 --> 00:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>obscure nineteenth century case called Kirby versus New York. Do

609
00:33:55.000 --> 00:33:57.839
<v Speaker 1>you want any chance to know that Andy case? It

610
00:33:57.960 --> 00:34:02.279
<v Speaker 1>was where some local Kentucky officials, local Kentucky sheriff arrested

611
00:34:02.720 --> 00:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a person from a male carrying barge for murder, right,

612
00:34:07.480 --> 00:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and as I'm look, I don't remember the exact details,

613
00:34:10.840 --> 00:34:13.079
<v Speaker 1>but the claim was made that this was the state

614
00:34:13.159 --> 00:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>interfering with the delivery of the lawyer. The person's lawyer argued,

615
00:34:16.840 --> 00:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a state interfering with the delivery of the mails.

616
00:34:18.960 --> 00:34:21.559
<v Speaker 1>That's illegal and the constitution you have to dismiss the

617
00:34:21.679 --> 00:34:24.199
<v Speaker 1>murder claim and put the sheriff on trialph Anyway, an

618
00:34:24.199 --> 00:34:26.519
<v Speaker 1>absurd case, and the Supreme Court saw right through it

619
00:34:26.639 --> 00:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>right away. It's a fun one to bring up with students,

620
00:34:29.000 --> 00:34:30.519
<v Speaker 1>But I want to ask you a political question.

621
00:34:30.920 --> 00:34:32.440
<v Speaker 6>Can I just can I just say?

622
00:34:32.480 --> 00:34:37.079
<v Speaker 2>Can I just say, Steve, there's analogous modern cases where

623
00:34:37.559 --> 00:34:39.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, you have a lot of these states think

624
00:34:39.599 --> 00:34:44.599
<v Speaker 2>that they're safe havens from the immigration laws. Right, So

625
00:34:44.880 --> 00:34:47.440
<v Speaker 2>the thear always is that if the if the federal

626
00:34:47.440 --> 00:34:50.079
<v Speaker 2>officials go in and try to arrest somebody or do

627
00:34:50.159 --> 00:34:52.519
<v Speaker 2>a search and further into the immigration laws, that the

628
00:34:52.559 --> 00:34:56.159
<v Speaker 2>state will arrest the federal officials. That kind of stuff

629
00:34:56.679 --> 00:34:58.000
<v Speaker 2>is a concern all the time.

630
00:34:59.480 --> 00:35:02.119
<v Speaker 3>Hi, this is and colder. You can hear me every

631
00:35:02.159 --> 00:35:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Monday on Ricochet with the five things you need to

632
00:35:05.119 --> 00:35:08.000
<v Speaker 3>know this week, and on Fridays, I'll give you the

633
00:35:08.039 --> 00:35:10.079
<v Speaker 3>big stories of the week that you may have missed.

634
00:35:10.440 --> 00:35:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Look for it every Monday and Friday on Ricochet or

635
00:35:13.400 --> 00:35:15.119
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your podcast.

636
00:35:15.360 --> 00:35:18.559
<v Speaker 6>Ricochet Join the conversation.

637
00:35:19.920 --> 00:35:21.519
<v Speaker 3>If I may just jump in here for a second.

638
00:35:21.519 --> 00:35:24.159
<v Speaker 3>I was attempting to find out exactly what case this was,

639
00:35:24.199 --> 00:35:26.559
<v Speaker 3>and so I typed Kirby Versus into my search bar

640
00:35:27.199 --> 00:35:30.840
<v Speaker 3>and it auto populated completed with Kirby versus Goku, Kirby

641
00:35:30.920 --> 00:35:36.719
<v Speaker 3>versus Jigglypuff versus Dice, Kirby versus Sonic, Kirby versus Mennonite,

642
00:35:36.760 --> 00:35:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Kirby versus Mario, and Kirby versus Superman. So I take

643
00:35:39.800 --> 00:35:47.000
<v Speaker 3>it that there is a game character named Kirby out there, Sitch, Yeah, right,

644
00:35:47.119 --> 00:35:49.000
<v Speaker 3>that's what I'm getting very nation.

645
00:35:49.559 --> 00:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It might be Usb Kirby. I might have had it backwards,

646
00:35:52.000 --> 00:35:53.519
<v Speaker 1>and so I screwed everything up.

647
00:35:54.239 --> 00:35:56.000
<v Speaker 6>It's a lot of it. There's a lot of United

648
00:35:56.039 --> 00:35:56.800
<v Speaker 6>States cases.

649
00:35:56.840 --> 00:35:58.800
<v Speaker 3>So you know, good luck, right.

650
00:36:00.480 --> 00:36:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Political question, I mean, you know, what was being thought

651
00:36:03.199 --> 00:36:05.119
<v Speaker 1>for the last year and seemed to be borne out

652
00:36:05.119 --> 00:36:07.559
<v Speaker 1>by events, was every one of these indictments of Trump

653
00:36:07.960 --> 00:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>strengthened him, at least with Republican voters in the Republican base.

654
00:36:12.119 --> 00:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And everyone's been saying for months, well, gosh, if Merchon

655
00:36:15.760 --> 00:36:18.199
<v Speaker 1>puts him in an orange jumpsuit and marches him off

656
00:36:18.199 --> 00:36:21.519
<v Speaker 1>to Rikers, Trump's gonna win in a landslide. And I

657
00:36:21.559 --> 00:36:23.559
<v Speaker 1>still kind of think that. On the other hand, everything

658
00:36:23.599 --> 00:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>has suddenly changed here. In the last sixty days, you had,

659
00:36:26.760 --> 00:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Biden was replaced by Harris. Harris is running

660
00:36:29.360 --> 00:36:33.199
<v Speaker 1>on joy. The latest poll show her pulling ahead by

661
00:36:33.280 --> 00:36:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, credible polsters. And suddenly I'm questioning everything I

662
00:36:38.360 --> 00:36:40.639
<v Speaker 1>thought I knew about American politics. Not everything, but I'm

663
00:36:40.719 --> 00:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>questioning whether it's still true that the legal harassment of

664
00:36:46.400 --> 00:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump helps him or not. I can actually see that

665
00:36:49.519 --> 00:36:51.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is good. In other words, voters are going

666
00:36:51.760 --> 00:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, Harris's untested, we know what she thinks,

667
00:36:54.400 --> 00:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, Trump is this convicted felon, And I'm worried.

668
00:36:57.880 --> 00:37:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Now that's just it just might work. What do you think?

669
00:37:00.880 --> 00:37:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think I've all along thought that this was

670
00:37:04.880 --> 00:37:11.039
<v Speaker 2>a conspiracy, a brilliant one by Democrats. Are pal Jonah

671
00:37:11.199 --> 00:37:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Goldberg has argued that I've been a little bit too

672
00:37:16.480 --> 00:37:18.800
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy minded about this, but I don't think it's a

673
00:37:18.840 --> 00:37:21.400
<v Speaker 2>complicated conspiracy. And I think it's when they ran in

674
00:37:21.440 --> 00:37:24.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty and twenty twenty two as well, and that

675
00:37:25.079 --> 00:37:29.679
<v Speaker 2>is that the indictments at the beginning, when the target

676
00:37:29.719 --> 00:37:34.079
<v Speaker 2>audience was the Republican base, rallied the base to Trump,

677
00:37:34.559 --> 00:37:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and it made it impossible for what I thought would

678
00:37:37.840 --> 00:37:41.599
<v Speaker 2>have been a more electable candidate like a DeSantis like

679
00:37:42.239 --> 00:37:47.639
<v Speaker 2>Haley to get traction with Republican voters. The Democrats wanted

680
00:37:47.639 --> 00:37:51.360
<v Speaker 2>to run against Trump, but they always thought Steve that

681
00:37:51.480 --> 00:37:55.360
<v Speaker 2>phase two of Law Fair was going to be in

682
00:37:55.400 --> 00:37:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the run up to the election. They were finally going

683
00:37:58.519 --> 00:38:00.400
<v Speaker 2>to get their trials, and they thought they were going

684
00:38:00.480 --> 00:38:02.760
<v Speaker 2>to get two or three of them and dump out

685
00:38:02.800 --> 00:38:07.119
<v Speaker 2>all the bad evidence in the form of riveting testimony

686
00:38:07.239 --> 00:38:10.360
<v Speaker 2>that the press was going to cover in every gory detail.

687
00:38:11.000 --> 00:38:14.920
<v Speaker 2>And then at that point, the target audience is the

688
00:38:15.000 --> 00:38:18.239
<v Speaker 2>voter the electorate at large rather than the Republican base.

689
00:38:18.599 --> 00:38:23.119
<v Speaker 2>In the electorate at large, Trump is much less popular,

690
00:38:23.159 --> 00:38:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, I think it's fair to argue

691
00:38:24.960 --> 00:38:28.440
<v Speaker 2>that he's unpopular with about fifty five percent of the country.

692
00:38:28.840 --> 00:38:32.199
<v Speaker 2>So I think that was the target audience. It was

693
00:38:32.280 --> 00:38:36.840
<v Speaker 2>probably a good strategy, and to me, I don't. I

694
00:38:36.880 --> 00:38:40.000
<v Speaker 2>think Charlie probably agrees with me on this, but I'll

695
00:38:40.079 --> 00:38:43.159
<v Speaker 2>let him obviously speak for himself. I think that what's

696
00:38:43.239 --> 00:38:47.719
<v Speaker 2>left on the table now are kind of low information

697
00:38:47.840 --> 00:38:49.840
<v Speaker 2>voters if you haven't made up your mind about what

698
00:38:49.880 --> 00:38:54.039
<v Speaker 2>you think about this, and while we look at this

699
00:38:54.079 --> 00:38:57.239
<v Speaker 2>stuff very closely, I think all those voters are going

700
00:38:57.280 --> 00:38:59.480
<v Speaker 2>to hear is that Trump got convicted of felonies. They're

701
00:38:59.480 --> 00:39:01.719
<v Speaker 2>not going to look into it the same way that

702
00:39:02.199 --> 00:39:05.119
<v Speaker 2>we have. And I just don't think this can help

703
00:39:05.159 --> 00:39:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump at this point with those voters. I think there's

704
00:39:08.440 --> 00:39:11.039
<v Speaker 2>a way that you can, like people who were informed,

705
00:39:11.440 --> 00:39:15.920
<v Speaker 2>could look at Bragg's case and go just like a

706
00:39:15.960 --> 00:39:19.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of you know, progressive commentators did. And I don't

707
00:39:19.480 --> 00:39:22.320
<v Speaker 2>think Democrats are happy that the Bragg case went first,

708
00:39:22.360 --> 00:39:26.679
<v Speaker 2>because I think the brag case tainted law there as

709
00:39:26.719 --> 00:39:29.400
<v Speaker 2>an enterprise, whereas if they had gone, say with the

710
00:39:29.440 --> 00:39:34.639
<v Speaker 2>Florida case, where there was a pretty strong obstruction element

711
00:39:34.679 --> 00:39:37.360
<v Speaker 2>to it against Trump, they would have had a much

712
00:39:37.400 --> 00:39:40.639
<v Speaker 2>better time with this than Bragg's case. Which is even

713
00:39:40.679 --> 00:39:44.559
<v Speaker 2>people on the on the left, at least the credible

714
00:39:44.559 --> 00:39:49.159
<v Speaker 2>ones diminute a small pool small pool, but they think

715
00:39:49.159 --> 00:39:51.639
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, they think it's a joke.

716
00:39:52.280 --> 00:39:55.440
<v Speaker 5>I think that low information point goes both ways, although

717
00:39:55.440 --> 00:39:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I do think it probably hurts him more than helps.

718
00:39:57.440 --> 00:39:59.960
<v Speaker 5>But if you're told it's a low information voter by

719
00:40:00.079 --> 00:40:04.559
<v Speaker 5>Trump or sarrogates that the system has gone after him

720
00:40:04.599 --> 00:40:06.360
<v Speaker 5>and you don't know any of the details, then you

721
00:40:06.400 --> 00:40:10.119
<v Speaker 5>perhaps believe that. And then if you're told on the

722
00:40:10.119 --> 00:40:12.239
<v Speaker 5>other side, why he's a convicted fell and you don't

723
00:40:12.239 --> 00:40:15.039
<v Speaker 5>know any of the details, then you believe that. So

724
00:40:15.079 --> 00:40:16.760
<v Speaker 5>the question is who gets to them first?

725
00:40:19.320 --> 00:40:20.320
<v Speaker 6>I guess, well, that's a proble.

726
00:40:20.320 --> 00:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I always say that low information voters is one of

727
00:40:22.920 --> 00:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>those you know, threewere euphemism for morons? How much I mean,

728
00:40:30.519 --> 00:40:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I always hate these debates A little rant here. I

729
00:40:32.639 --> 00:40:36.119
<v Speaker 1>always hate these debates with undecided voters are in town

730
00:40:36.119 --> 00:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>hall format with three weeks to go before an election.

731
00:40:38.840 --> 00:40:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Who can be undecided with three weeks to go in

732
00:40:40.679 --> 00:40:43.519
<v Speaker 1>the presidential race? Well morons, that's and that's why those

733
00:40:43.639 --> 00:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>debates so often are moronic, and why it always this

734
00:40:46.440 --> 00:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>favors Republicans. It seems to me, yeah.

735
00:40:48.719 --> 00:40:49.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well you don't want morons.

736
00:40:49.960 --> 00:40:53.000
<v Speaker 2>And I thought about this a lot when we I

737
00:40:53.039 --> 00:40:57.159
<v Speaker 2>tried the blind shake back in the nineties, and one

738
00:40:57.199 --> 00:41:01.280
<v Speaker 2>of the things that the defense wanted was, like, anybody

739
00:41:01.320 --> 00:41:04.000
<v Speaker 2>who had heard about the World Trade Center bombing or

740
00:41:04.039 --> 00:41:06.599
<v Speaker 2>some other notorious things that we had shouldn't be on

741
00:41:06.679 --> 00:41:09.199
<v Speaker 2>the case because they've already formed. And I said, like,

742
00:41:09.440 --> 00:41:11.880
<v Speaker 2>anybody who hasn't heard about this has been living under

743
00:41:11.920 --> 00:41:15.280
<v Speaker 2>a rock. That's not somebody that you want as ature

744
00:41:15.440 --> 00:41:16.039
<v Speaker 2>in a case.

745
00:41:16.159 --> 00:41:18.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, right right.

746
00:41:21.360 --> 00:41:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Before we go, and we've plenty of time here. I'm

747
00:41:24.039 --> 00:41:25.840
<v Speaker 3>not trying to hasten you off the broom or a hook,

748
00:41:26.000 --> 00:41:29.280
<v Speaker 3>but to change the subject. Mark Zuckerberg re had a

749
00:41:29.320 --> 00:41:34.320
<v Speaker 3>letter where he said, you know what, yeah, yeah, they

750
00:41:34.320 --> 00:41:37.280
<v Speaker 3>did ask us to take some stuff down. And it's

751
00:41:37.280 --> 00:41:39.920
<v Speaker 3>interesting that some of the things that the Biden Harris,

752
00:41:40.199 --> 00:41:43.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, there I go tethering again. Administration I wanted

753
00:41:43.320 --> 00:41:47.119
<v Speaker 3>to get rid of was a satire and humor when

754
00:41:47.119 --> 00:41:48.719
<v Speaker 3>it came to things like COVID and the virus in

755
00:41:49.159 --> 00:41:53.400
<v Speaker 3>the vaccine and the rest of it. What are we

756
00:41:53.760 --> 00:41:57.920
<v Speaker 3>to make of this? And isn't a little late for

757
00:41:58.239 --> 00:42:00.760
<v Speaker 3>this information to be coming out? Or have we all

758
00:42:00.760 --> 00:42:02.800
<v Speaker 3>just decided, as we did, that the laptop was faked,

759
00:42:02.840 --> 00:42:05.920
<v Speaker 3>that the Twitter files and the Facebook files that they

760
00:42:05.960 --> 00:42:08.679
<v Speaker 3>were coming out with, that's all settled and factored in

761
00:42:08.719 --> 00:42:10.920
<v Speaker 3>and baked in. Isn't it something that somebody would want

762
00:42:11.079 --> 00:42:14.719
<v Speaker 3>that a canny campaign would want to make a point of.

763
00:42:15.159 --> 00:42:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, when you talk about authoritarianism, which we're supposed

764
00:42:17.920 --> 00:42:19.800
<v Speaker 3>to be very worried about because it's going to destroy

765
00:42:20.000 --> 00:42:24.480
<v Speaker 3>our democracy, this seems kind of authority. This seems kind

766
00:42:24.480 --> 00:42:26.280
<v Speaker 3>of fashy to me, to use their terms.

767
00:42:27.280 --> 00:42:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd say two things about it. First, it would

768
00:42:30.320 --> 00:42:34.239
<v Speaker 2>have been nice to have Zuckerberg's testimony in the case

769
00:42:34.519 --> 00:42:37.519
<v Speaker 2>that the Supreme Court decided at the end of the term.

770
00:42:37.840 --> 00:42:41.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, remember they threw out that they threw out

771
00:42:41.599 --> 00:42:45.599
<v Speaker 2>this challenge because they said that the States and the

772
00:42:46.119 --> 00:42:50.559
<v Speaker 2>social media users whose communications or postings had been suppressed,

773
00:42:50.880 --> 00:42:53.760
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't have standing. And the big problem with

774
00:42:53.880 --> 00:42:58.679
<v Speaker 2>the case was there was a tenuous connection. This is

775
00:42:58.679 --> 00:43:01.920
<v Speaker 2>always a problem when you're you're going after the third

776
00:43:01.960 --> 00:43:06.519
<v Speaker 2>party actors. Right, their communications were suppressed directly by the

777
00:43:06.559 --> 00:43:09.039
<v Speaker 2>social media platforms. But what they were saying was that

778
00:43:09.079 --> 00:43:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the government officials were the ones who were responsible when

779
00:43:12.480 --> 00:43:14.400
<v Speaker 2>you have a case like that, you have to show

780
00:43:14.400 --> 00:43:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a tight connection between the actions of the third party,

781
00:43:17.960 --> 00:43:23.480
<v Speaker 2>and you know, hear the suppression And what Justice Barrett

782
00:43:23.519 --> 00:43:26.400
<v Speaker 2>said in her majority opinion was that the case was

783
00:43:26.440 --> 00:43:30.440
<v Speaker 2>poorly pled by the plainers, that the lower courts had

784
00:43:30.480 --> 00:43:33.480
<v Speaker 2>just gotten some stuff flatly wrong in their analysis of

785
00:43:33.880 --> 00:43:38.280
<v Speaker 2>the record, and that the claims were too attenuated. Now,

786
00:43:38.760 --> 00:43:41.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, Justice Alito had a pretty good pushback on that,

787
00:43:41.760 --> 00:43:44.559
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of what Barrett said about the standing

788
00:43:44.639 --> 00:43:45.599
<v Speaker 2>was very persuasive.

789
00:43:46.079 --> 00:43:48.679
<v Speaker 6>It would have been nice to have Zuckerberg's testimony.

790
00:43:48.760 --> 00:43:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Zuckerberg's testimony could have helped them on the causation part

791
00:43:53.039 --> 00:43:55.840
<v Speaker 2>of this. So, you know, I think to the extent

792
00:43:55.920 --> 00:43:58.159
<v Speaker 2>people think that the Supreme Court has now said you

793
00:43:58.159 --> 00:43:59.880
<v Speaker 2>can't bring a case like that, that's not what they

794
00:44:00.079 --> 00:44:01.679
<v Speaker 2>said that. What they said was that this one was

795
00:44:01.719 --> 00:44:05.159
<v Speaker 2>poorly played and that you have to show a better

796
00:44:05.440 --> 00:44:09.039
<v Speaker 2>chain of evidence. The more important thing, I think, and

797
00:44:09.280 --> 00:44:11.480
<v Speaker 2>this really goes to the Hunter Biden story, and this

798
00:44:12.320 --> 00:44:18.519
<v Speaker 2>should be a major major scandal. The Hunter Biden laptop

799
00:44:19.119 --> 00:44:23.599
<v Speaker 2>stuff that got suppressed happened in October of twenty twenty,

800
00:44:23.679 --> 00:44:27.760
<v Speaker 2>in the run up to the election. The FBI got

801
00:44:28.000 --> 00:44:34.039
<v Speaker 2>Hunter's laptop in December of twenty nineteen. They had it

802
00:44:34.119 --> 00:44:38.719
<v Speaker 2>for nearly eleven months when they were going to the

803
00:44:38.880 --> 00:44:41.840
<v Speaker 2>social media companies and telling them watch out for that,

804
00:44:42.639 --> 00:44:44.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, Russian disinformation.

805
00:44:44.239 --> 00:44:46.559
<v Speaker 6>There could be Russian disinformation.

806
00:44:45.920 --> 00:44:50.199
<v Speaker 2>About the Biden family and about Hunter. And I think

807
00:44:50.239 --> 00:44:53.119
<v Speaker 2>if you I tried to do this in a piece

808
00:44:53.360 --> 00:44:58.679
<v Speaker 2>at NR this week, if you trace the chrinology of

809
00:44:58.679 --> 00:45:03.119
<v Speaker 2>what happened. The the FBI had Hunter's laptop, knew it was,

810
00:45:03.920 --> 00:45:07.360
<v Speaker 2>they had subjected it to forensic testing, They knew that

811
00:45:07.400 --> 00:45:10.199
<v Speaker 2>it was authentic. There was no reason to think it

812
00:45:10.320 --> 00:45:17.840
<v Speaker 2>wasn't authentic. But what happened was in twenty twenty, the

813
00:45:17.880 --> 00:45:24.360
<v Speaker 2>two Republican senators, Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson are investigating

814
00:45:24.440 --> 00:45:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the Biden influence pedling scheme and they're getting all kinds

815
00:45:30.320 --> 00:45:33.440
<v Speaker 2>of evidence about it, mainly financial records. That was really

816
00:45:33.480 --> 00:45:36.320
<v Speaker 2>what the House built its investigation on the scut work

817
00:45:36.400 --> 00:45:40.679
<v Speaker 2>that Johnson and Grassley had done. And they're collecting all

818
00:45:40.679 --> 00:45:44.159
<v Speaker 2>these bank records and suspicious transaction reports from the banks

819
00:45:44.199 --> 00:45:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and all this other stuff that show that there's a

820
00:45:46.000 --> 00:45:49.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of smoke here at the very least, and the

821
00:45:49.400 --> 00:45:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Democrats in Congress were very concerned about that. So top

822
00:45:54.840 --> 00:45:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Democrats in the House and then also in the Senate,

823
00:45:58.760 --> 00:46:03.440
<v Speaker 2>acting together, ask their pals at the FBI, in particular

824
00:46:03.920 --> 00:46:07.280
<v Speaker 2>a guy named Tim Thiebo, who was running the Washington

825
00:46:07.320 --> 00:46:12.079
<v Speaker 2>Field office and was later forced into early retirement over

826
00:46:12.119 --> 00:46:18.159
<v Speaker 2>his anti Republican, anti conservative social media postings. They call

827
00:46:18.280 --> 00:46:23.559
<v Speaker 2>up THEBO, the Democrats do, and they say, we would

828
00:46:23.679 --> 00:46:29.199
<v Speaker 2>like a briefing from you on Russian disinformation and interference

829
00:46:29.239 --> 00:46:34.800
<v Speaker 2>in our elections. And THEBO assigns to it a guy

830
00:46:34.920 --> 00:46:39.599
<v Speaker 2>named Auton, who we know as the handler for the

831
00:46:39.639 --> 00:46:43.000
<v Speaker 2>guy who provided the information for the Steele dossier.

832
00:46:43.360 --> 00:46:45.119
<v Speaker 6>So that's where he's coming from.

833
00:46:45.199 --> 00:46:49.800
<v Speaker 2>He's under investigation by the Bureau for his participation in

834
00:46:49.880 --> 00:46:52.719
<v Speaker 2>the misrepresentations that were made to the Pisa Court in

835
00:46:52.760 --> 00:46:55.719
<v Speaker 2>connection with the Russia Gate stuff, and yet he gets

836
00:46:55.719 --> 00:47:00.119
<v Speaker 2>brought in to do an analysis of Russian disinformation as

837
00:47:00.159 --> 00:47:03.880
<v Speaker 2>it affects as it may affect the election. So what

838
00:47:04.039 --> 00:47:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Grassley says in a letter is we never asked for

839
00:47:07.760 --> 00:47:11.360
<v Speaker 2>a briefing, and this stuff wasn't Russian disinformation.

840
00:47:11.440 --> 00:47:12.679
<v Speaker 6>These were bank records.

841
00:47:12.719 --> 00:47:14.679
<v Speaker 2>There was no reason to think any of this stuff

842
00:47:14.760 --> 00:47:18.440
<v Speaker 2>was coming from the Kremlin. And as I've pointed out

843
00:47:18.480 --> 00:47:22.199
<v Speaker 2>a number of times, the fact that something even if

844
00:47:22.239 --> 00:47:27.320
<v Speaker 2>it is disinformation or information that's provided by the Russians,

845
00:47:27.519 --> 00:47:29.039
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't make it inaccurate.

846
00:47:29.159 --> 00:47:30.760
<v Speaker 6>Sometimes the Russians.

847
00:47:30.280 --> 00:47:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Actually leaked through information if they think it could put

848
00:47:33.920 --> 00:47:36.760
<v Speaker 2>somebody in a bad light. So the whole thing was

849
00:47:36.920 --> 00:47:42.159
<v Speaker 2>complete bs. But the Democrats use the fact that the

850
00:47:42.239 --> 00:47:48.719
<v Speaker 2>FBI collaborated with them in doing a writing an analysis

851
00:47:48.840 --> 00:47:52.159
<v Speaker 2>up that talked about Russian interference in the election and

852
00:47:53.159 --> 00:47:57.480
<v Speaker 2>did it particularly in the context of Biden and Ukraine.

853
00:47:57.599 --> 00:47:59.840
<v Speaker 2>And then what the Democrats did was they began to

854
00:48:00.280 --> 00:48:03.000
<v Speaker 2>that to the Washington Post and all the usual suspects,

855
00:48:03.400 --> 00:48:08.679
<v Speaker 2>and wella, we have a you know, a gaslight situation

856
00:48:08.840 --> 00:48:13.480
<v Speaker 2>where they've created this story that this is all Russian disinformation.

857
00:48:14.360 --> 00:48:16.880
<v Speaker 2>And at roughly the same time when all this is

858
00:48:16.920 --> 00:48:20.880
<v Speaker 2>going on, we now know that Anthony Blincoln, who was

859
00:48:20.920 --> 00:48:27.239
<v Speaker 2>then a Biden campaign official, is working with Mike Morell

860
00:48:27.440 --> 00:48:32.519
<v Speaker 2>and these other Clapper and Brennan and these former Obama

861
00:48:34.599 --> 00:48:39.079
<v Speaker 2>intelligence officials, you know, national security officials, and they crank

862
00:48:39.119 --> 00:48:42.599
<v Speaker 2>out the letter that's fifty one of them sign off

863
00:48:42.599 --> 00:48:46.440
<v Speaker 2>on saying that we're not saying that we have any

864
00:48:46.519 --> 00:48:49.039
<v Speaker 2>of the inside facts here, but this sure looks like

865
00:48:49.119 --> 00:48:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Russian disinformation, which Biden then a couple of days later

866
00:48:53.400 --> 00:48:55.719
<v Speaker 2>when they have the debate with Trump, like I think

867
00:48:55.760 --> 00:48:58.599
<v Speaker 2>it was the last of the debates between Trump and Biden,

868
00:48:58.920 --> 00:49:04.280
<v Speaker 2>when Trump raised the Biden evidence, Biden used the letter

869
00:49:04.360 --> 00:49:08.800
<v Speaker 2>from the fifty one officials saying that it was Russian disinformation,

870
00:49:08.960 --> 00:49:12.760
<v Speaker 2>like conclusively saying four former CIA directors have said this

871
00:49:12.840 --> 00:49:17.559
<v Speaker 2>is Russian disinformation. So to me, the big issue here

872
00:49:18.079 --> 00:49:23.480
<v Speaker 2>is not just what Zuckerberg said, which is remarkable on

873
00:49:23.559 --> 00:49:26.679
<v Speaker 2>its face, but if you trace what happened here, this

874
00:49:26.719 --> 00:49:30.920
<v Speaker 2>is an elaborate fraud conspiracy, and if it had been pulled,

875
00:49:31.119 --> 00:49:33.400
<v Speaker 2>if Republicans had even tried to pull it off, it

876
00:49:33.440 --> 00:49:34.960
<v Speaker 2>would be the scandal of the century.

877
00:49:35.440 --> 00:49:36.119
<v Speaker 6>Now, I think.

878
00:49:36.280 --> 00:49:40.159
<v Speaker 2>It's basically being dismissed as the old news. Maybe it's

879
00:49:40.159 --> 00:49:43.719
<v Speaker 2>because the Trump campaign's not competent enough to make a

880
00:49:43.760 --> 00:49:46.559
<v Speaker 2>big to do with this. Maybe it's because the media

881
00:49:46.639 --> 00:49:48.280
<v Speaker 2>just won't let it be a story. But I think

882
00:49:48.320 --> 00:49:50.559
<v Speaker 2>that's one of the most scandless things I've ever seen.

883
00:49:51.159 --> 00:49:54.000
<v Speaker 3>I agree, if you have a laptop that has videos

884
00:49:54.119 --> 00:49:58.119
<v Speaker 3>of an own drug addict chopping up some cocaon a mirror.

885
00:49:58.599 --> 00:50:02.519
<v Speaker 3>Ockham's razor says, that's Hunter's a razor. Andy. It's kind

886
00:50:02.519 --> 00:50:04.480
<v Speaker 3>a pleasure. You're talking to you as usual. We learn

887
00:50:04.559 --> 00:50:06.719
<v Speaker 3>so much, and we'll talk to you again down the

888
00:50:06.760 --> 00:50:10.119
<v Speaker 3>road again when something legal that we don't like or

889
00:50:10.239 --> 00:50:14.639
<v Speaker 3>is annoying or frightening happens. So I have a good liberty, will.

890
00:50:14.559 --> 00:50:16.639
<v Speaker 6>Have a great, weaken great weekend.

891
00:50:19.320 --> 00:50:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Before we go. And we got a couple of other things.

892
00:50:21.320 --> 00:50:23.519
<v Speaker 3>And yes, that's the second time I've said before we go.

893
00:50:23.599 --> 00:50:25.679
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like I got to be somewhere. I don't

894
00:50:26.239 --> 00:50:27.760
<v Speaker 3>you know. I got a lunch, I got the gym.

895
00:50:27.760 --> 00:50:29.840
<v Speaker 3>We got a nice weekend ahead of me, three days

896
00:50:29.840 --> 00:50:31.599
<v Speaker 3>in which the wife will put me to doing various

897
00:50:31.599 --> 00:50:34.280
<v Speaker 3>things around the house. She's decided that there should be

898
00:50:34.280 --> 00:50:36.559
<v Speaker 3>more stones in the front yard. We got three big

899
00:50:36.599 --> 00:50:39.800
<v Speaker 3>stones last week, and then she cogitated a while and

900
00:50:40.280 --> 00:50:42.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of study them the way an artist does when

901
00:50:42.880 --> 00:50:45.440
<v Speaker 3>he steps back from his canvas to see how it's working.

902
00:50:45.719 --> 00:50:48.679
<v Speaker 3>She's decided that we need more geological formations in there,

903
00:50:49.440 --> 00:50:53.039
<v Speaker 3>which is my lot in life to haul stones. If

904
00:50:53.079 --> 00:50:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I was the sort of person who enjoyed gaming on

905
00:50:55.360 --> 00:50:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the Internet, and I do. And if I was the

906
00:50:57.840 --> 00:51:00.199
<v Speaker 3>sort of person who also did things like fantasy football,

907
00:51:00.360 --> 00:51:03.320
<v Speaker 3>and I don't, i'd be right up there with Ricochet's

908
00:51:03.360 --> 00:51:06.480
<v Speaker 3>new fantasy football league. Luckily, Charlie Cook is a great

909
00:51:06.519 --> 00:51:10.079
<v Speaker 3>fan of football and as a guy, can tell us

910
00:51:10.079 --> 00:51:12.280
<v Speaker 3>what it's all about and encourage people to sign up

911
00:51:12.320 --> 00:51:13.400
<v Speaker 3>and play. Right.

912
00:51:13.480 --> 00:51:16.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think the exact details of this and how

913
00:51:16.320 --> 00:51:20.480
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be executed still need working out, and

914
00:51:20.519 --> 00:51:23.239
<v Speaker 5>we'll be very soon. But what is more important is

915
00:51:23.280 --> 00:51:26.000
<v Speaker 5>who wants to do it. If you want to do

916
00:51:26.039 --> 00:51:28.199
<v Speaker 5>it and you're a member at Ricochet, and there do

917
00:51:28.239 --> 00:51:29.559
<v Speaker 5>seem to be a whole bunch of people, I just

918
00:51:29.599 --> 00:51:31.440
<v Speaker 5>don't want anyonet to be left out. This is why

919
00:51:31.440 --> 00:51:33.880
<v Speaker 5>we've mentioned it a couple of times and we pinned

920
00:51:33.920 --> 00:51:39.159
<v Speaker 5>it on Ricochet and we will soon be sending out

921
00:51:39.880 --> 00:51:44.599
<v Speaker 5>messages subliminally to all Ricochet members just to say football, football, football, football,

922
00:51:45.239 --> 00:51:48.239
<v Speaker 5>If you want in say so. There's a little logo

923
00:51:48.639 --> 00:51:51.000
<v Speaker 5>icon graphic on the right hand side of the site

924
00:51:51.039 --> 00:51:53.599
<v Speaker 5>at the moment, which has a football picture and says

925
00:51:53.679 --> 00:51:56.760
<v Speaker 5>Ricochet Fantasy Football and if you are interested, click it

926
00:51:56.960 --> 00:52:03.039
<v Speaker 5>and register your interest. And the details will be forthcoming

927
00:52:03.840 --> 00:52:04.400
<v Speaker 5>this week.

928
00:52:05.159 --> 00:52:07.519
<v Speaker 3>And if you're thinking, what exactly is a center right

929
00:52:07.519 --> 00:52:10.960
<v Speaker 3>political side doing talking about football and fantasy football, it's

930
00:52:11.000 --> 00:52:13.679
<v Speaker 3>because Ricochet is so much more than just chattering upon politics.

931
00:52:13.679 --> 00:52:16.039
<v Speaker 3>If you go to the member feed, which does cost

932
00:52:16.119 --> 00:52:18.519
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, yeah, not a lot, but it's worth it,

933
00:52:18.639 --> 00:52:20.599
<v Speaker 3>you will find mean the sites that are free, they're

934
00:52:20.599 --> 00:52:25.400
<v Speaker 3>worth every penny Ricochet. We're talking old time radio, new

935
00:52:25.440 --> 00:52:29.000
<v Speaker 3>time music, meme dumbs, literature, fiction also, got means just

936
00:52:29.199 --> 00:52:30.960
<v Speaker 3>there's so much going on in the member feed, you

937
00:52:31.039 --> 00:52:32.960
<v Speaker 3>ought to check it out. One of the things we've

938
00:52:32.960 --> 00:52:36.440
<v Speaker 3>been talking about though, in the member is this question

939
00:52:36.519 --> 00:52:39.440
<v Speaker 3>that's vexing me. And I'll end with this. That's the

940
00:52:39.440 --> 00:52:43.079
<v Speaker 3>third time I mentioned we're ending. It's anagging question. I

941
00:52:43.119 --> 00:52:45.880
<v Speaker 3>know it probably is ridiculous to bring it up, but

942
00:52:45.920 --> 00:52:47.519
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna ask you guys and give you both a

943
00:52:47.519 --> 00:52:52.440
<v Speaker 3>shot at this. Who's running the country right now?

944
00:52:56.840 --> 00:52:58.679
<v Speaker 1>You can tell by our silence we have no idea

945
00:52:58.719 --> 00:53:03.519
<v Speaker 1>who's running the country right serious question. I worry that

946
00:53:03.599 --> 00:53:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it's some intern, or somewhat more seriously, that it's the

947
00:53:07.920 --> 00:53:10.400
<v Speaker 1>chief of staff whose name I don't even remember right now,

948
00:53:10.519 --> 00:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>or that Susan Rice has been the shadow president from

949
00:53:13.880 --> 00:53:16.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the very beginning. I have no idea, but I

950
00:53:16.360 --> 00:53:18.559
<v Speaker 1>should hope we find out someday. It would be nice to.

951
00:53:18.519 --> 00:53:20.239
<v Speaker 3>Know, you know.

952
00:53:20.639 --> 00:53:25.559
<v Speaker 5>I was asked this a lot before Joe Biden disappeared

953
00:53:25.559 --> 00:53:30.000
<v Speaker 5>from public view, when he seemed seen island.

954
00:53:31.840 --> 00:53:32.360
<v Speaker 6>Indolent.

955
00:53:33.360 --> 00:53:35.599
<v Speaker 5>I was asked who was running the country, And usually

956
00:53:35.599 --> 00:53:37.920
<v Speaker 5>the question came in connection with a theory that the

957
00:53:37.960 --> 00:53:41.559
<v Speaker 5>person asking me had you had a particular figure in mind.

958
00:53:41.679 --> 00:53:46.360
<v Speaker 5>Is it Barack Obama? Is it Susan Rice? And my

959
00:53:46.480 --> 00:53:50.760
<v Speaker 5>answer then is the same as it is now, which is,

960
00:53:51.800 --> 00:53:54.400
<v Speaker 5>if you understand how the left works, the answer to

961
00:53:54.440 --> 00:53:58.159
<v Speaker 5>the question is the progressive blob. The progressive blob is

962
00:53:58.199 --> 00:54:03.920
<v Speaker 5>running the country. They are not reliant upon a president

963
00:54:04.079 --> 00:54:07.519
<v Speaker 5>in the way that the Constitution envisions a president, which

964
00:54:07.559 --> 00:54:11.000
<v Speaker 5>is a person who has control over the executive branch,

965
00:54:11.079 --> 00:54:14.400
<v Speaker 5>not over legislation, not over the Supreme Court, but over

966
00:54:14.440 --> 00:54:17.320
<v Speaker 5>the executive branch. This is another reason, incidentally, why they're

967
00:54:17.360 --> 00:54:23.840
<v Speaker 5>so horrified by the idea of the executive being able

968
00:54:23.880 --> 00:54:29.239
<v Speaker 5>to control all aspects of the executive branch, including these

969
00:54:29.280 --> 00:54:33.519
<v Speaker 5>supposedly free floating institutions. The Department of Justice, and the FBI,

970
00:54:33.639 --> 00:54:37.320
<v Speaker 5>the fourth branch of government that we are supposed to have.

971
00:54:37.480 --> 00:54:40.519
<v Speaker 5>We don't have that, but in their estimation, it works

972
00:54:40.559 --> 00:54:43.800
<v Speaker 5>much better if we have that set up. Because the

973
00:54:43.800 --> 00:54:48.719
<v Speaker 5>Progressive Blob is this sort of permanent, lumbering, self executing

974
00:54:49.000 --> 00:54:52.719
<v Speaker 5>thing that knows that its basic task in the world

975
00:54:52.840 --> 00:54:57.159
<v Speaker 5>is to advance progressive policy in the prospects of progressive politicians.

976
00:54:57.199 --> 00:55:00.880
<v Speaker 5>And they don't need Joe Biden to be active for

977
00:55:00.960 --> 00:55:03.239
<v Speaker 5>that to work. They don't need Kamala Harris to be

978
00:55:03.280 --> 00:55:05.920
<v Speaker 5>able to speak English or have any ideas for that

979
00:55:06.599 --> 00:55:11.039
<v Speaker 5>to work. On the Republican side, because this exists, you

980
00:55:11.119 --> 00:55:13.119
<v Speaker 5>actually do need someone and I'm afraid Trump is not

981
00:55:13.199 --> 00:55:16.719
<v Speaker 5>this person, as the last administration showed. You actually do

982
00:55:16.840 --> 00:55:20.199
<v Speaker 5>need somebody like a desantist in Florida who is full

983
00:55:20.239 --> 00:55:23.280
<v Speaker 5>of vigor and ideas and resolve, who is going to

984
00:55:23.920 --> 00:55:29.800
<v Speaker 5>through his own sheer force of character, make the executive

985
00:55:29.840 --> 00:55:32.519
<v Speaker 5>branch to do what the elected head of that executive

986
00:55:32.559 --> 00:55:35.199
<v Speaker 5>branch wants. So the answer is the Progressive Blob is

987
00:55:35.199 --> 00:55:38.400
<v Speaker 5>how democratic administrations work, and they're not suffering from the

988
00:55:38.440 --> 00:55:41.440
<v Speaker 5>lack of Joe Biden right now because everything's running on autopilot.

989
00:55:42.360 --> 00:55:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Can offer you one last observation from a traveler, Believe

990
00:55:46.639 --> 00:55:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it or not. Here in Kubik there is the Monument

991
00:55:49.480 --> 00:55:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Unknown Bureaucrat. I am not making that up

992
00:55:53.159 --> 00:55:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and our listeners won't be able to see this, but

993
00:55:55.360 --> 00:55:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to show it to you guys here if

994
00:55:56.960 --> 00:56:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I can. Yeah, there it is, and if listen, just

995
00:56:01.519 --> 00:56:04.199
<v Speaker 1>look it up. It's the solid stone block that goes

996
00:56:04.239 --> 00:56:06.440
<v Speaker 1>down about the waste of a bureaucrat, and I think

997
00:56:07.400 --> 00:56:09.199
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't be any more perfect than it is. I

998
00:56:09.320 --> 00:56:13.159
<v Speaker 1>encourage listeners to google the Monument to the Unknown Bureaucrat.

999
00:56:13.440 --> 00:56:16.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a perfect, if unintended I think, an ironic a

1000
00:56:16.840 --> 00:56:19.320
<v Speaker 1>description of what Charlie describes, which is the blob that

1001
00:56:19.400 --> 00:56:22.480
<v Speaker 1>actually runs the country, that is impervious to outside pressure

1002
00:56:22.920 --> 00:56:26.559
<v Speaker 1>or erosion or lightening strikes, whatever metaphor you want.

1003
00:56:28.519 --> 00:56:32.920
<v Speaker 3>That art is a work of staggering genius. I heartily

1004
00:56:33.000 --> 00:56:35.239
<v Speaker 3>endorse it, and I think that it should be put

1005
00:56:35.320 --> 00:56:38.159
<v Speaker 3>up outside of every state capital in this great country

1006
00:56:38.159 --> 00:56:40.760
<v Speaker 3>of ours. Stephen, as long as you're in Reika vicdumuitzevor

1007
00:56:40.840 --> 00:56:42.599
<v Speaker 3>go down to the bar when you do and have

1008
00:56:42.760 --> 00:56:47.039
<v Speaker 3>a Reika r e Yka it is the best Icelandic vodica.

1009
00:56:47.559 --> 00:56:50.280
<v Speaker 3>I think they filter it through lava rock or something

1010
00:56:50.320 --> 00:56:53.360
<v Speaker 3>like that. You can really taste the lava, but it's

1011
00:56:53.400 --> 00:56:56.480
<v Speaker 3>really good. Charles, I can offer you no advice for

1012
00:56:56.599 --> 00:56:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Florida cocktails except to say that I hope you have

1013
00:56:58.920 --> 00:57:01.800
<v Speaker 3>one on this great week. And of course, as an American,

1014
00:57:01.960 --> 00:57:04.199
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be grilling. I'm going to be grilling.

1015
00:57:06.440 --> 00:57:07.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what you're going to be doing, Steven

1016
00:57:07.719 --> 00:57:09.159
<v Speaker 3>out there when it comes to laborty, but I hope

1017
00:57:09.199 --> 00:57:12.320
<v Speaker 3>somebody can supply with hot dogs, ribs, beef, hamburgers and

1018
00:57:12.360 --> 00:57:16.079
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the staples. Happy long weekend and puffing

1019
00:57:16.199 --> 00:57:19.039
<v Speaker 3>and puffing that's right, that's right. If you have some

1020
00:57:19.119 --> 00:57:21.639
<v Speaker 3>puffin thyroid on a toothpick or something like that, I'm

1021
00:57:21.679 --> 00:57:27.360
<v Speaker 3>sure that that's gormand enough. Be lieve you with whatever

1022
00:57:27.400 --> 00:57:30.840
<v Speaker 3>song our producer says, And we thank you for listening

1023
00:57:30.880 --> 00:57:33.119
<v Speaker 3>to us. We enjoin you to give us good reviews

1024
00:57:33.119 --> 00:57:36.960
<v Speaker 3>at Apple iTunes, and we will see everybody in the

1025
00:57:37.159 --> 00:57:41.519
<v Speaker 3>comments where why of course Ricochet dot com Next week, guys,

1026
00:57:41.559 --> 00:57:42.639
<v Speaker 3>have a good weekend.

1027
00:57:42.360 --> 00:57:43.559
<v Speaker 5>All right, Thanks James.

1028
00:57:43.920 --> 00:57:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Next week
