Speaker 1: This is Dan Kaplis, and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. Yeah, and winning
Speaker 1: so much, we're going to get tired of winning, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, so many reasons to be happy today. And yeah,
Speaker 1: it's not over. Trump could still lose the race, but
Speaker 1: he'd have to give it away at this point, even
Speaker 1: before last night, but with Vance doing such a great
Speaker 1: job last night, and I think the impact of the
Speaker 1: victory is magnified way beyond the norm by multiple factors,
Speaker 1: including the facts. First time ever there's not a presidential
Speaker 1: debate after the vice presidential debate. This is the bow,
Speaker 1: this is the loop when it comes to the whole
Speaker 1: debate cycle. And the last word is a thorough, thorough
Speaker 1: posterior kicking last night. And more important than that is
Speaker 1: just how well Vance performed, even if Walts had been better,
Speaker 1: just how well Vance performed. And I think that it
Speaker 1: helps the ticket so much in part because hey, he's young, right.
Speaker 1: I think there's a real craving in America for a good, strong,
Speaker 1: young leadership. And Harris is younger than Trump. But Harris
Speaker 1: isn't young, She's sixty. Vance is forty. And I think
Speaker 1: any honest person last night, even if they despise his policies,
Speaker 1: could look at Vance and say that is a brilliant
Speaker 1: guy and articulate guy, strong guy who can deliver under
Speaker 1: pressure when the lights are brightest. Yeah, that's the skill
Speaker 1: set you would want in your president. And honestly, do
Speaker 1: you think one person, including Tim Walls, went home last
Speaker 1: night and said, boy, I really want to see Tim
Speaker 1: Walls as president. I don't think anybody went home last
Speaker 1: night and said that, or man, that guy he's a
Speaker 1: five tool player. He could really be a great president.
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody went home last night and set that.
Speaker 1: That's why we have had a blast today playing all
Speaker 1: this sound of lefty heads exploding over the big win
Speaker 1: last night for JD.
Speaker 2: Vance.
Speaker 1: Let me give you a little taste of that before
Speaker 1: we go to the phone lines and some truly great text.
Speaker 1: And I want to get to the text. Who talks
Speaker 1: about my wife? But this is not my wife, Thank
Speaker 1: you God, this is Nicole Wallace.
Speaker 3: It's the audacity. I agree with you that we're in
Speaker 3: year nine and no one knows how to cover the audacity.
Speaker 3: The audacity is that someone should stop it, stop stop
Speaker 3: are you eff in kidding me? And they should have
Speaker 3: they should have dropped that at bomb, right, I mean
Speaker 3: they should have. Just we this is a debate. This
Speaker 3: may be the only chance people have to see the difference.
Speaker 1: No, this is what I've been predicting for a long time.
Speaker 1: This is the formal clinical definition of an exploding head.
Speaker 1: That was what you just heard. That's an exploding head.
Speaker 1: When a network anchor, you know, said they should have
Speaker 1: dropped the F bomb, et cetera. Over quote the audacity
Speaker 1: and what exactly does she mean? She just means jd
Speaker 1: Vance standing up there and speaking these conservative truths in
Speaker 1: a way that's very articulate, very precise, and appropriately, you know,
Speaker 1: very palatable for the American people. The left can't handle
Speaker 1: that well, left cannot handle that.
Speaker 4: And cutting all this audio for you down. It's the
Speaker 4: only way I'm sampling CNNMSNBC. If it had gone well
Speaker 4: for Tim Wallas, if you had knocked it out of
Speaker 4: the park, none of this sound would be coming our
Speaker 4: way the way that you just heard. Nicole Wallace is
Speaker 4: just grasping at straws. You had Simone Sanders eminently frustrated.
Speaker 4: You have all these anchors that are basically saying, look, JD.
Speaker 4: Vance put on a clinic and showed how it was
Speaker 4: done exactly and to extend it. If wall c Had
Speaker 4: done a really good job last night, but Vance had
Speaker 4: still done as well as he did, they'd still be
Speaker 4: freaking because what they're seeing, obviously, is is they're seeing
Speaker 4: another eight years beyond Trump. They're seeing the extension of
Speaker 4: Mega and they're seeing it in a form and that's
Speaker 4: why she talked about the audacity in her head was popping.
Speaker 4: They're seeing it in a form that's going to be very,
Speaker 4: very appealing to more American people. I mean President Trump,
Speaker 4: he's been magical. He's been historic in his ability to
Speaker 4: get a lot of people who don't normally vote to vote,
Speaker 4: and he hasn't been as effective in say, getting suburban moms, etc.
Speaker 4: Yet he's still on the verge of probably getting a
Speaker 4: second term. We hope JD. Vance has the ability to
Speaker 4: bring those same policies, in that same approach to a
Speaker 4: much broader audience. And that's what was freaking them out
Speaker 4: last night is A it's going to help Trump win here,
Speaker 4: but B Trump's got one term left and then obviously
Speaker 4: vance or. His performance last night has positioned himself to
Speaker 4: be the successor. That's scaring the heck out of him
Speaker 4: because he's going to be able to enlarge the ten.
Speaker 4: This text, before we get back to our phone lines,
Speaker 4: Dan poor Amy, referring to my wife, I honestly don't
Speaker 4: know how she stands it. Give her some respect if
Speaker 4: you treat her like you treat every other person that
Speaker 4: doesn't agree with you. I really feel sorry for fact
Speaker 4: check on our texter. My wife and I have been
Speaker 4: married thirty plus years. Why do you think she's stayed?
Speaker 4: Just call the show or text me. I'd love your
Speaker 4: thoughts on why you think. I mean this is if
Speaker 4: you're new to the area. My wife is incredibly kind,
Speaker 4: incredibly smart, a wonderful human. Everybody says that, and physically stunning.
Speaker 4: Talented reporter too as well.
Speaker 1: Very talented reporter and Emmy Award winning news anchor King Go,
Speaker 1: which is where I met her and proposed to her
Speaker 1: on set during a newscast. Bold only mistake she ever
Speaker 1: made was saying yes, and that was just kind of
Speaker 1: out of sympathy because I was sitting right next to her.
Speaker 1: She's sitting there thinking, Okay, if I say no, there's
Speaker 1: nowhere in the world this guy can go. He's going
Speaker 1: to be the la laughing stock of this planet and
Speaker 1: any other planet that has civilized life.
Speaker 4: Did she say that to you?
Speaker 1: No, but you could see the look in her eye.
Speaker 4: I got to pull that audio back up.
Speaker 1: So it was a sympathy, yes, but I'll take it.
Speaker 1: All I'm saying is she had options, all right, lots
Speaker 1: of options. Thirty plus years later, she's still there. So
Speaker 1: text her, how do you explain that one? And what
Speaker 1: we were talking about earlier? It was all very good natured.
Speaker 1: When we were sitting at the counter last night, We're
Speaker 1: having this great spaghetti pie she made, and we're watching
Speaker 1: the debate and I start yapping about Walls and I'm
Speaker 1: making fun of his facial expressions and everything else, and
Speaker 1: she warned me a couple of times and then disappeared.
Speaker 1: Dan she did come back.
Speaker 4: Oh well that's good.
Speaker 1: She did come back. Yes, Urie, Mike kind enough to
Speaker 1: join us on the dan kapla. So finally something we
Speaker 1: can agree on that jd Vance won big appreciate you
Speaker 1: calling and tell me that eerie. How are you?
Speaker 2: I'm fine lyle Yeah, yeah, I have seen the pictures
Speaker 2: and you have definitely out kicked your cover.
Speaker 5: You do that?
Speaker 1: Thank you?
Speaker 2: Yeah? For sure? Which picture I was actually calling? I
Speaker 2: was actually calling to do you need my venmo?
Speaker 1: Or?
Speaker 2: How do you want to give me that steak that
Speaker 2: you you said you would give me yesterday when I
Speaker 2: won the bet?
Speaker 1: My friend I was very disappointed. I didn't pull up
Speaker 1: to the building here and have a grill outside and
Speaker 1: you'd be cooking me a tomahawk. Yeah, so you're claiming
Speaker 1: you won the bet.
Speaker 2: I sent you the YouTube video. Did you look at it?
Speaker 1: How did you send it to me?
Speaker 2: I texted it to Dan and I said, Dan, if
Speaker 2: you have the number, you get out.
Speaker 1: Oh you mean at this show?
Speaker 2: Yet?
Speaker 1: It won't this, Mike, this won't let us put links
Speaker 1: through when we're off air. Kelly will give you a
Speaker 1: number you can text it to. Yeah, but just just
Speaker 1: tell everybody, not that we can rely on it, nothing personal,
Speaker 1: but tell everybody what The video shows a.
Speaker 2: Video show where he said that he had he hadn't
Speaker 2: needed to create the story to bring attention to the
Speaker 2: immigration problem he would do. So that's why that's that
Speaker 2: was the bet we made that I said.
Speaker 1: He I can't wait, Yeah, I cannot wait to see
Speaker 1: that video of my friend.
Speaker 2: And in fact, and in fact last night, I think
Speaker 2: even he doubled down on it because Michael, after he
Speaker 2: mentioned the illegal immigrants during the debate, yeah, and CBS
Speaker 2: and uh, they didn't follow their own rules. They did,
Speaker 2: they were there, they were there, there there illegally, and
Speaker 2: he said, hey, that's against the rules. You weren't going
Speaker 2: to fact check me.
Speaker 1: And then he showed they had lied. Then they showed
Speaker 1: he had lied. But you know, Mike, here's how I know.
Speaker 1: You owe me a Tomnel. No, they like the moderator,
Speaker 1: like the miss Liah's too strong word. The moderator who
Speaker 1: pretended to be fact checking him was was in fact
Speaker 1: misleading the audience. But and he showed him. He proved that.
Speaker 1: That's why they cut off his mic. Do you think
Speaker 1: that if he was losing they would have cut off
Speaker 1: his mic. They cut off his mic because he was winning.
Speaker 1: But Michael, here's my proof, OK, and everybody in the audience.
Speaker 4: Will know it.
Speaker 1: DM.
Speaker 2: Mike, you're lying right now, Mike.
Speaker 1: Now, can I ask a question, a historical question that
Speaker 1: is perplexed me forever. How did you survive on the playground?
Speaker 1: How did you not just get Pete to a pulp
Speaker 1: on the playground. I don't mean that in a mean way,
Speaker 1: but but stuff like this where Okay, I put out
Speaker 1: the facts, they show you wrong, and you just say
Speaker 1: you're lying, you're lying. But Mike, here's here's the proof.
Speaker 1: Here's the proof that I'm right.
Speaker 2: Okay, let me have an opportunity to get myself. I'll
Speaker 2: tell you why you're lying.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, you're welcome to you after in the
Speaker 1: next segment. Sorry, but we've got to hit this break
Speaker 1: or we're all be out of here involuntarily. But here's
Speaker 1: the point. The way we know Mike is wrong when
Speaker 1: he claims that, Hey, you know, I don't know if
Speaker 1: you said advance or Trump said we just made up
Speaker 1: the cats and dogs. You know, to call attention immigration
Speaker 1: is if that tape existed, it is all that you
Speaker 1: would be seen, or I would be seen, or anybody
Speaker 1: would be seen on virtually every new station out there,
Speaker 1: and I've never seen it once. The reason is it
Speaker 1: doesn't exist. Why that sounded eerily like Biden didn't it.
Speaker 2: It doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: You're on the Dan Caplas.
Speaker 4: Show and now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcasts.
Speaker 5: Pretty clear Vance outclassed Walls tonight. I mean I was
Speaker 5: watching this and all I could think of was, man,
Speaker 5: Walls is so went over his head. I mean, can
Speaker 5: you imagine this guy sitting in the White House situation
Speaker 5: room with that facial expression that's like fifty percent sheer
Speaker 5: tear and fifty percent extreme bafflement. I mean, it was
Speaker 5: amazing the split screen difference between a competent Vance and
Speaker 5: a totally.
Speaker 4: In over his head Walls.
Speaker 5: The answer on why he lied about his trips to
Speaker 5: China and the T and M and square thing was
Speaker 5: probably the worst VP debate meltdown since Stockdale in ninety two.
Speaker 5: You know who am I and why am I here?
Speaker 5: It was two and a half minutes of absolute terrible
Speaker 5: for Vance. Night of Redemption. All the political media has
Speaker 5: told us that Vance was a terrible pick and Walls
Speaker 5: was going to bring in all these voters. That charade
Speaker 5: is now over. Wals does not belong at this level
Speaker 5: of American politics. Vance does. Final verdict, Tim Walls wandered
Speaker 5: into the wrong bar tonight.
Speaker 1: Wow, Scott Jennings is so good on CNN. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be a good test for CNN, right, whether they give
Speaker 1: Scott Jennings his own show, whether he gets a full
Speaker 1: hour credit to CNN. And they're they're relatively new management
Speaker 1: for putting Jennings on air prominently right, because he's very,
Speaker 1: very good. I'd love to see him run for office myself.
Speaker 1: Eight five five for zero five A two five five.
Speaker 1: Some of the greatest sounds you will ever hear of
Speaker 1: lefty tears being shed, very prominent at a high level
Speaker 1: after Vance was so stellar last night, but we kept
Speaker 1: earing Mike over because he disagrees, and we're always so
Speaker 1: grateful for that, and I wanted to let him finish
Speaker 1: his point. He claims he won a Tomahawk's Take bet
Speaker 1: with me where he said he would provide proof that
Speaker 1: did you say was JD. Vance or Trump or both?
Speaker 1: Had admitted and I'll put that in quotes, that that
Speaker 1: they made up the cats and dogs story, the eating
Speaker 1: cats and dogs and pets story for a fact, Did
Speaker 1: you say was Vance or Trump or both?
Speaker 2: Mike Vance?
Speaker 1: Okay, And so you now claim to have sent video
Speaker 1: that will prove that right.
Speaker 2: Well, I sent it to you via text. I'm in
Speaker 2: my vehicle right now. Okay, I listened to your commercials.
Speaker 2: You don't want me.
Speaker 1: To no goodness, no, no, And I don't even want
Speaker 1: you to pull over because you could get hit on
Speaker 1: the side of the road and the world without Eerie
Speaker 1: Mike would be a very sad place.
Speaker 6: Well.
Speaker 2: And plus, I don't want to give you any more business.
Speaker 2: I mean, gess you're rich enough. It sounds like so
Speaker 2: so rich. My point is.
Speaker 1: Enough rich in love. I say I'm rich in love,
Speaker 1: which is all that matters.
Speaker 2: Rich in love. I got it, I got it, I understand.
Speaker 7: No.
Speaker 2: So when I get to my hotel room I'm in Wisconsin,
Speaker 2: I'll be happy to send it to you. And I'll
Speaker 2: bet you another.
Speaker 1: State Interstate eight.
Speaker 2: That you won't play it. You won't play it on there.
Speaker 1: Wait, Mike, have you ever listened to this show? I've
Speaker 1: been coming on air for almost thirty years. Kelly will
Speaker 1: tell you. Do you really think Kelly screens people? Do
Speaker 1: you think Kelly tries to keep people off air because
Speaker 1: of what they want to say? No, this is this
Speaker 1: is the one beacon here.
Speaker 2: Do you like to bring people in a disagree, and
Speaker 2: then you hit the mute button.
Speaker 1: Here what person? Oh no, no, no, And I know
Speaker 1: you're begging for that now, Mike, but and I might
Speaker 1: have to do it. But here, here's the point. The
Speaker 1: only reason I ever hit the mute button is when
Speaker 1: somebody won't answer a fair direct question. At that point,
Speaker 1: they're just wasting our time. Then I bring them back
Speaker 1: normally and give them a chance to answer. But no,
Speaker 1: appreciate the call, my friend. We'll look at the video.
Speaker 1: We gave Mike off Era a number he could send
Speaker 1: it to and not mine, So we'll look at that video.
Speaker 1: But we know it doesn't exist, or you'd be watching
Speaker 1: it right now on CNN and MSNBC and everybody else.
Speaker 1: They make up all these lies about Trump and Vance.
Speaker 1: If they add something real to work with, yeah, you
Speaker 1: can be sure.
Speaker 4: They do it.
Speaker 1: Speaking of good news, my friend, this and no one
Speaker 1: pole tells the full story, right. But this Emerson College
Speaker 1: poll that's just out today in c D eight, did
Speaker 1: you see that one?
Speaker 4: I've been told about it.
Speaker 1: Oh, you've been told yes, Well, I can confirm the
Speaker 1: good news that it has the race tied between Gabe Evans,
Speaker 1: who we hope is going to be on soon and often.
Speaker 1: I was writing with his people yesterday on that and Caraveo.
Speaker 1: And the reason I say that's great news because obviously
Speaker 1: like Gabe to be up ten points. The reason it's
Speaker 1: great news is Caraveo must have been spent a billion
Speaker 1: time the last month. Right, who has watched anything on
Speaker 1: TV and not seen five cara Ao ads. So if
Speaker 1: after that kind of saturation, and I cannot even imagine
Speaker 1: how much that cost, this race is tied, that's very
Speaker 1: good news for Gabe. But you want to know some
Speaker 1: really great news within the good news. They also polled
Speaker 1: on the top issues for CD eight. Anybody want to
Speaker 1: guess what they are and then I'll give you percentages abortion.
Speaker 4: Based on the debate last night and the priority and
Speaker 4: climate change. Okay, that's Nora O'Donnell and Margaret Brennan. Now
Speaker 4: this is what CD eight voters say. Now, I'm just saying, right,
Speaker 4: that's how stupid those two were last night and.
Speaker 1: CD eight I would call it corrupt, But CD eight
Speaker 1: is like the classic right down the middle, might be
Speaker 1: decided by three votes swing district. So do you think
Speaker 1: this reflects America? Twenty eight percent of the voters found
Speaker 1: the economy is the top issue. No big surprise. I
Speaker 1: mean the CNN their own polling last night showed what
Speaker 1: economy doubled the next closes issue. Economy was forty one
Speaker 1: percent in the CNN post of eight poll, and what
Speaker 1: was second to twenty one might have been immigration. I'll
Speaker 1: double check. But here's here's where I get to the
Speaker 1: fun stuff. Twenty eight percent said yeah, economy, followed by
Speaker 1: housing affordability a twenty one percent, immigration twenty one percent.
Speaker 1: Where do you think threats to democracy came in? Eleventh
Speaker 1: nine percent? What percentage of the voters in CD eight
Speaker 1: said that abortion access was their top priority in CD
Speaker 1: eight five three percent? Think about that, three percent of
Speaker 1: the voters in CD eight, classic swing district. It has
Speaker 1: its own unique feature. It features That's why I see
Speaker 1: housing affordability, but three percent say it's their top priority.
Speaker 1: It's all the Democrats had, I know. It's what they're
Speaker 1: hanging their whole hat on. Is we'll kill those babies
Speaker 1: up to the minute you deliver. That is the whole
Speaker 1: Democrat party pitch. Yeah, yeah, three percent eight five five
Speaker 1: for zero five A two five five the number, And
Speaker 1: that brings us to something, you know, After the break,
Speaker 1: we'll play more this fun sound of the left losing
Speaker 1: their minds over Vance's great performance, and we'll play some
Speaker 1: of the key debate moments as well. But but what
Speaker 1: I want to talk about as well is, hey, that
Speaker 1: the criticism. There's been some criticism from some prominent corners
Speaker 1: people I really respect that JD. Vance went too light
Speaker 1: on pro life, and then others praising it, saying, no,
Speaker 1: that's that's what you got to do to win. Then
Speaker 1: you do all your pro life stuff when you get
Speaker 1: in office. I want to give you my take on it,
Speaker 1: because if you're kind enough to listen to this show,
Speaker 1: you know, for decades, pro life has been the foundational
Speaker 1: issue for me for lots of different reasons, including you
Speaker 1: know what if they kill you before you're born. These
Speaker 1: other issues really don't matter much, But I want to
Speaker 1: give you my take on the approach that Vance took
Speaker 1: last night. First, though, i'll play some sound from a
Speaker 1: very highly highly respected conservative thinker who also happens to
Speaker 1: be pro life, as I think any true conservative would
Speaker 1: have to be right just by definition. But he will
Speaker 1: give you his take on why he thinks Vance blew
Speaker 1: it on that and should have been much stronger on
Speaker 1: the life issue. Anxious to get yours eight FI five
Speaker 1: for zero five A two five five takes da N
Speaker 1: five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1: He listened to Classic has JD. Vance schooling Margaret Brennan.
Speaker 6: Just to clarify for our viewers, Springfield, Ohio does have
Speaker 6: a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status
Speaker 6: temporary protective Laura, thank you, senator. We have so much
Speaker 6: to get to.
Speaker 4: I think it's important to.
Speaker 1: Think about it before we go further. And I know
Speaker 1: you know how this ends. That's why we're playing it.
Speaker 1: It's so much fun think about how corrupt that is,
Speaker 1: how dishonest that is. CBS says their moderators are not
Speaker 1: going to debate Vance. That's what they mean when they
Speaker 1: say no fact check. They're just jumping into the ring
Speaker 1: and they're debating three on one. So the deal was
Speaker 1: the moderators wouldn't do it. She sees that Vance is
Speaker 1: winning big and Waltz is losing big, so she decides
Speaker 1: to break the rules. So she jumps in and says
Speaker 1: something that is deceptive. So now JD. Vance is going
Speaker 1: to call her on it, and she's going to stop him.
Speaker 1: That is fundamentally corrupt. That is corrupt journalism. It's a
Speaker 1: corruption of journalism. It is fundamentally dishonest. But maybe Jadvance's
Speaker 1: finest moment in an evening full of great moments. Jadvance
Speaker 1: is not going to take it. He's going to fight back.
Speaker 1: She's trying to silence them, and eventually turns off his mic,
Speaker 1: which is an admission that he was right.
Speaker 4: Margaret.
Speaker 7: The rules were the got in a fact check, and
Speaker 7: since you're fact checking me, I think it's important to
Speaker 7: say what's actually going on. So there's an application called
Speaker 7: the CBP one app where you can go on as
Speaker 7: an illegal migrant, apply for asylum or apply for parole,
Speaker 7: and be granted legal status at the wave of a
Speaker 7: Kamala Harris open border Wand that is not a person
Speaker 7: coming in applying for a green cart and waiting for
Speaker 7: ten years. Thank you, senatoration of a legal immigration Margaret Bie.
Speaker 6: Thank you, senator for describing the legal process.
Speaker 1: Listen to that tone, Listen to that tone, just mocking him.
Speaker 1: It's this elitist thing. He is ten times smarter than
Speaker 1: these lefties who try to take him down. I don't
Speaker 1: care about their gender ten times smarter. And he just
Speaker 1: proved it. He proved her deception, and so what does
Speaker 1: she do now, cuts off his mic?
Speaker 6: Have so much to get, Senator the book since nineteen ninety,
Speaker 6: Thank you, gentlemen, we want to have that has not
Speaker 6: been on the.
Speaker 1: Books, so.
Speaker 6: Are cut We have so much we want to get
Speaker 6: to Thank you for explaining the legal process.
Speaker 1: We've got the presidency at stake, and you've got this
Speaker 1: these arrogant elitist lefties in the media silencing vans so
Speaker 1: we can't speak the truth. And that was if you
Speaker 1: ever saw the end of Rocky four, well, I don't
Speaker 1: want to spoil it for you, but if you've ever
Speaker 1: seen somebody you know, just throw the towel into the
Speaker 1: ring so the fighter doesn't get pummeled any longer. That's
Speaker 1: what CD That's what CBS just did. They cut off
Speaker 1: the mic because Vance was proving her wrong and dishonest.
Speaker 4: Did she thinks she was just going to be able
Speaker 4: to throw that out the rules of the debate and
Speaker 4: have not respond.
Speaker 1: Because that's what Republicans do. Bingo, yeah and yeah, no,
Speaker 1: but listen, they are in this mode. And we talked
Speaker 1: about it. They were much worse last night than I
Speaker 1: thought they'd be. But but we talked about it. I
Speaker 1: predicted it before the ABC debate. For them, it is
Speaker 1: on it. The truth doesn't matter, facts doesn't matter, the
Speaker 1: rules don't matter. It is kill Trump. And I'm talking politically.
Speaker 1: It is kill Trump. And so that's what it's all about.
Speaker 1: And it's it's such a disgrace to journalism and it
Speaker 1: undermines confidence if there's any left at all in the
Speaker 1: entire profession of journalism. Yeah, it is. It's just horrible
Speaker 1: because this country needs good journalism, it needs a healthy
Speaker 1: journalism sector. And people like that and like Mirror and
Speaker 1: Lindsay Davis, they're just bearing the credibility of journalism. But
Speaker 1: it was a great favor to Jdvent's right. The American
Speaker 1: people are smart across party lines. I was a Democrat
Speaker 1: for decades before I became a Republican. People that the
Speaker 1: vast majority of people across party lines are fair minded
Speaker 1: people and they know on fairness when they see it.
Speaker 1: And that's why it helped Trump in the ABC debacle,
Speaker 1: that that ABC was so unfair to those moderators, and
Speaker 1: it helped vance last night even more so because he
Speaker 1: was able to flip it on him, he showed it
Speaker 1: allowed him Ryan, it allowed him to show off these
Speaker 1: elite skills and brain that he has. He was able
Speaker 1: to flip it on him real time live.
Speaker 4: He did. The thing that really infuriates me. Dan is
Speaker 4: somebody who's done this job going back twenty five years now,
Speaker 4: and I take it very seriously. Now, we express opinions
Speaker 4: on this show, and that's what the show is for.
Speaker 4: But if you and I were to moderate a debate,
Speaker 4: now we lean right, there's no doubt about that. We
Speaker 4: wouldn't hide from that, we wouldn't lie about it. But
Speaker 4: I think we'd be far more fair to Tim Walls
Speaker 4: or Kamala Harris than what we're seeing from CBS or
Speaker 4: ABC with Trump and Vance.
Speaker 1: You understate it, my friend, because the reality just conservatives
Speaker 1: by nature. The reality is we would bend over backwards.
Speaker 1: We'd need a chiropractor and a massage therapist. We would
Speaker 1: bend over backwards to prove we are being fair. If anything,
Speaker 1: excuse me, it would be unfair to the conservative. Perhaps
Speaker 1: lefties are the exact opposite, because here's the difference, my friend. Okay,
Speaker 1: for all of our for all of our imperfections. We
Speaker 1: have the truths on our side. The lefties are living
Speaker 1: a political lie. They can't win on the facts, logic,
Speaker 1: common morality. They're living a lie. The only way they
Speaker 1: can win is lying and censoring, right, I mean, that's
Speaker 1: the only way they can win. That's the difference. So
Speaker 1: the lefties out there in their minds, it's all justified.
Speaker 1: They're gonna lie about this, a lie about this with Vance.
Speaker 1: They're going to shut down Vans, They're going to shut
Speaker 1: down Trump. They're going to do everything other then give
Speaker 1: a massage on air to the Democrat because that's the
Speaker 1: only way they could win. They can't win with the
Speaker 1: truth because they don't have the truth on their side.
Speaker 1: They can't win with facts. They don't have the facts
Speaker 1: on their side. So yeah, we as moderators, we would
Speaker 1: be bad for conservatives because we'd bend over backwards to
Speaker 1: show we were being fair.
Speaker 4: And I just laughed in the whole exchange there, because
Speaker 4: to your point, jd. Vance is owning it. He knows
Speaker 4: the facts about that specific case and the so called
Speaker 4: fact check that Margaret Brennan, who I might add was
Speaker 4: far worse than Nora O'Donnell who I don't like, But
Speaker 4: Margaret was far worse, and in this instance, because she
Speaker 4: was so smug and that look on her face and
Speaker 4: the tone in her voice, like you just heard there too.
Speaker 4: And if JD. Vance was bumbling, stumbling, let's say, like
Speaker 4: Walls was, she would have let him hang himself with
Speaker 4: his own rope. But he wasn't struggling, so she tried
Speaker 4: to shut him down, tried to shut him down, then
Speaker 4: cut his mic.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but it was such a favorite to Walls, right,
Speaker 1: It is such a favorite to Vance, right, And they
Speaker 1: tried to do a lot of favors for Walls, but
Speaker 1: it just let fans show off those superior skills, superior intellect. Dan,
Speaker 1: why do you suppose neither Trump or Vance responded on
Speaker 1: the abortion issue that the power for states to determine
Speaker 1: their own abortion laws is the way the Constitution says
Speaker 1: it should be. The Constitution is very clear on what
Speaker 1: the federal government is allowed to dictate. I thought that
Speaker 1: they both said that. I thought they both made that point. Well,
Speaker 1: that hey, it's going back to the states. The people
Speaker 1: of the states should have it. Now there's criticism, and
Speaker 1: I'll get to that sound in the next break. There's
Speaker 1: criticism from a prominent conservative voice and a great pro
Speaker 1: lifer that Vance went too light on the life issue.
Speaker 1: I'll play that in the next segment and give you
Speaker 1: my take on it. There's no doubt in my mind
Speaker 1: about JD. Vance's pro life credentials. As I've said since
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, I've always assumed that President Trump is at
Speaker 1: heart pro choice, but that doesn't concern me as long
Speaker 1: as he uses his power to advance pro life. And
Speaker 1: we have not had a more pro life president in
Speaker 1: terms of action in our lifetime than Donald Trump. He's
Speaker 1: been a pro life champion when he actually has the
Speaker 1: reigns of power and has decisions to make, and I
Speaker 1: fully expect he would largely be that way in his
Speaker 1: next term. But one thing we know for sure, he
Speaker 1: will be a thousand times better than Harrison Walls. They
Speaker 1: are politically the death Star. They revel in this mass killing.
Speaker 1: They want to promote it, they want to enlarge it,
Speaker 1: they want to enhance it right up to the moment
Speaker 1: that mother can be fully dilated, ready to deliver, and
Speaker 1: Harrison Walls say that baby can be killed, dismembered on
Speaker 1: the spots. So when it comes down to people who
Speaker 1: care about using the political power God gave him, which
Speaker 1: is the ability to vote in these elections and maybe
Speaker 1: more to save innocent humans from being killed. It is
Speaker 1: not even a close call. It's the easiest decision anyone
Speaker 1: will ever have to make to vote for Trump over Harris.
Speaker 1: Is he perfect on it? Of course not, but he
Speaker 1: is light years better than she is. You're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Caplas Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 7: As I read the Minnesota law that you signed into
Speaker 7: into law, the statute that you signed into law, it
Speaker 7: says that a doctor who presides over an abortion where
Speaker 7: the baby survives, the doctor is under no obligation to
Speaker 7: provide a life saving care to a baby who survives
Speaker 7: a botched late term abortion.
Speaker 4: That is I think, whether pro choice or provider show.
Speaker 1: That is fun to listen to. That This is what
Speaker 1: they do all the time, right that they deny what
Speaker 1: the law actually says. Why do they deny that? Because
Speaker 1: it's right there in the law. And Vance brilliantly, because
Speaker 1: he was ready for that denial, just said, okay, well
Speaker 1: show me show me where I'm wrong. Well, what in
Speaker 1: the law says I'm wrong? Because Vance is absolutely right,
Speaker 1: but they deny it because they know if people knew
Speaker 1: the truth, if they knew the truth that Jared Polis
Speaker 1: and Tim Walls and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, they
Speaker 1: supply they fight for they make money off of, meaning
Speaker 1: political donation money fighting to allow that baby to be killed.
Speaker 1: Up to the very moment of delivery, people would look
Speaker 1: at them like monsters. So they just lie and say, oh, no,
Speaker 1: we don't support that, when it's exactly what they support.
Speaker 1: So I'm glad that Vance called him out on that
Speaker 1: last night. By the way, pole came out of CD
Speaker 1: eight today, it's not a CD eight pole, it's an
Speaker 1: outside Paul Emerson showing that Rag tiede. So we hope
Speaker 1: to have gave Evans on tomorrow to talk about that.
Speaker 1: That's very positive news. But it showed abortion three percent.
Speaker 1: Three percent of the voters in CD eight said abortion
Speaker 1: was their top issue. Economy, of course, was number one
Speaker 1: by a mile. So much more fun sound to play
Speaker 1: today because it's what we've been predicting. Right, it's all
Speaker 1: these lefty heads explosion exploding, pardon me, after JD. Vance
Speaker 1: shined last night, and they're so scared for so many reasons.
Speaker 1: First of all, obviously it helps Trump and what many
Speaker 1: perceive as a close race, it helps Trump win. But
Speaker 1: it also shows the ability of this movement because the
Speaker 1: Trump movement has been something we've never seen before, right,
Speaker 1: so many people that don't normally vote, etc. It shows
Speaker 1: the ability of this Trump movement now to be carried
Speaker 1: into the future with a messenger like JD Vance who
Speaker 1: is so smart and so articulate and can make this
Speaker 1: can make these principles and policies appeal to a broader
Speaker 1: audience in America. And that's just causing him to go crazy.
Speaker 1: Here's Abbie Philip on CNN. I think we shouldn't lose track.
Speaker 4: I think even in the civility of the fact that JD.
Speaker 4: Vance came to this to be to land a bunch
Speaker 4: of punches, and he did. He landed a lot of
Speaker 4: punches in.
Speaker 1: And it goes on from there. And here's Nicole Wallace
Speaker 1: before I play the Walsh sound in just a flat
Speaker 1: and meltdown.
Speaker 3: It's the audacity. I agree with you that we're in
Speaker 3: year nine and no one knows how to cover the audacity.
Speaker 1: The audacity. Is it so much?
Speaker 2: Stop? Stop?
Speaker 3: Are you eff in kidding.
Speaker 1: Me, And yeah, see they're losing their minds because it
Speaker 1: helps jump nowt but going into the future, they can
Speaker 1: see Vance winning. Now here's Matt Walsh, highly respected conservative
Speaker 1: pro lifer, critical that Vance went so lightly on life.
Speaker 8: Another big victory was the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Speaker 8: And that's why I know again, I understand all the
Speaker 8: strategic stuff, but I think there's a strategic mistake being
Speaker 8: made on the abortion issue.
Speaker 1: I agree, but by Republicans.
Speaker 8: I understand that it's it is there are elements of
Speaker 8: our position as pro lifers that are unpopular. I get
Speaker 8: all that we want to win the women over suburban women.
Speaker 8: I understand all that, But the leftist position on abortion
Speaker 8: is in fact barbaric, it is in fact deranged. It's
Speaker 8: actually indefensible intellectually. There are so many land mines for
Speaker 8: the left on this issue that they're able to just
Speaker 8: like jump over because we don't guide them into it.
Speaker 1: I agree with him one thousand percent, and I think
Speaker 1: Fance was an a plus last night. I think he
Speaker 1: could have even been better if he had taken this approach.
Speaker 1: Matt Walsh's recommending on abortion. There's no doubt in my
Speaker 1: mind that Fance is committed to the pro life cause
Speaker 1: and he took the approach he took because he thinks
Speaker 1: it will help them win. I respectfully disagree. Here's Walsh
Speaker 1: some more.
Speaker 8: I've been waiting for someone to do this, and I
Speaker 8: guess it's not gonna happen this cycle. But in one
Speaker 8: of these debates sometime, I would love for Republican to
Speaker 8: just turn to the Democrat and say, Okay, what we're
Speaker 8: really talking about here, this is the fundamental issue here
Speaker 8: is what is a person? When is a person? University right,
Speaker 8: maybe it will be when is a person? So turn
Speaker 8: to the Democrat and say, this is what we're talking about.
Speaker 8: So at what point is the baby in the womb
Speaker 8: a person? Can you answer that? And they won't be
Speaker 8: able to answer it. They're going to say Obama famously
Speaker 8: said above my pig, right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and he's right about that. I would refine it
Speaker 1: a bit and turn to them and say, Okay, at
Speaker 1: what point is that a human? At what point is
Speaker 1: that a child who should not be killed? And then
Speaker 1: point to the moment before birth. Because every one of
Speaker 1: these Democrat candidates that is going to support and fight
Speaker 1: for the ability to kill that baby after the mother's
Speaker 1: fully dilated and about to be born, and you just
Speaker 1: expose him on that. So I agree with that, Listen,
Speaker 1: I understand the thinking that went into the approach last night.
Speaker 1: I would bet that the vast majority of the people
Speaker 1: listening now would agree with the approach that was taken
Speaker 1: last night. It obviously freaked out the left and went
Speaker 1: over very well with the focus groups. I mean, you saw,
Speaker 1: you saw, right. I hadn't seen a single focus group
Speaker 1: that went for Walls. Every focus group on all these
Speaker 1: lefty stations went for Vance. Did you see where the
Speaker 1: focus groups went for Vance? On global warming? Overwhelmingly went
Speaker 1: for Vance.
Speaker 2: Nice.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so I get what they were trying to do.
Speaker 1: I just think And by the way, JD. Vance did
Speaker 1: some very good life stuff last night and stood up
Speaker 1: and made some great points. It's not like he abandoned
Speaker 1: the issue at all. But I do believe overall that
Speaker 1: the best approach politically is My mom, who I view
Speaker 1: as one of the founders of the pro life movement,
Speaker 1: used to say, which is doing the right thing is
Speaker 1: always good politics, and I trust in the people that
Speaker 1: way as well. So I believe in the approach of
Speaker 1: just straight up in a civil way, a controlled way,
Speaker 1: but a smart, articulate kind of way. Pin that Democrat
Speaker 1: down on what they're actually supporting and don't let them
Speaker 1: get off the hook. But overall, definitely a plus for Vance.
Speaker 1: Really helped the cause short term and long term. Ryan,
Speaker 1: tremendous job, my friend. Thank you for your great work.
Speaker 1: As always, I know it was a ton that went
Speaker 1: into this sound today though JD. Vance really did the
Speaker 1: hard work right and Doug Kelly human sunshine again. The
Speaker 1: only downside we have to do the show in shades,
Speaker 1: but it's worth it. Thank you. Kelly. Join us tomorrow
Speaker 1: please on The Dan Kaplis Show