Speaker 1: Or when it decides, and we are live today is
Speaker 1: September eleventh, twenty twenty four, eight oh two am. I'm
Speaker 1: here with Diego Garcia Bulletproof pub and we have a
Speaker 1: very special guest, the founder of FTJ Media, SFR and
Speaker 1: Money Tree Publishing, Dave Gaheri.
Speaker 2: Hello, Dave, Hey, how are you?
Speaker 3: Daniel?
Speaker 2: And Diego Garcia never made it to Diego Garcia and
Speaker 2: in the Navy, and I'm probably fortunate not to have.
Speaker 4: Made it there.
Speaker 2: From what I've heard, it was just like a rock
Speaker 2: How about you, Daniel. I mean, I don't know. I
Speaker 2: don't think the Coast Guard when it went out to
Speaker 2: those regions, right.
Speaker 1: No, sir, nope. I was compas on Luca's Portavera Masalan Manzanillo.
Speaker 1: We did a nice Maaja Peninsula drugon Addiction.
Speaker 2: Very nice, very nice. Yeah. So thank you for having
Speaker 2: me on briefly for the beginning of your show, and
Speaker 2: I just wanted to stop by for a couple of reasons.
Speaker 2: One is, of course we've got FTJ off the ground,
Speaker 2: and thanks really to you, primarily Daniel for introducing us
Speaker 2: to Josh who who shouldn't have done that, Josh who
Speaker 2: is doing great work over there, and of course you
Speaker 2: made the introduction, so thank you, Daniel. If it wasn't
Speaker 2: for you doing that, then not to say that it
Speaker 2: never would have happened, but it certainly wouldn't have happened
Speaker 2: in the manner that it has happened, and that manner
Speaker 2: is very positive. So we've been getting a lot of
Speaker 2: the kinks worked out. And well, you and I were
Speaker 2: just speaking yesterday and we're communicating yesterday, I think we
Speaker 2: were speaking and you said that you're very impressed with
Speaker 2: the platform and how it's performing. So that goes a
Speaker 2: long way because you do a lot of show, a
Speaker 2: lot of great shows, and you've been doing this for
Speaker 2: a while, and that's really why FTJ came to be
Speaker 2: for the hosts, so the hosts, the creators, the talent
Speaker 2: can do their shows in the best way possible. And
Speaker 2: of course that leads me into the next part of
Speaker 2: why I want to come aboard. And by the way,
Speaker 2: I'm I'm going to be doing this with all the
Speaker 2: hosts coming aboard their shows if they would have me
Speaker 2: to talk about, you know, whatever they'd want to talk about,
Speaker 2: but primarily to promote them for the great work they're doing.
Speaker 2: And so you are doing terrific work, and it came
Speaker 2: to my attention that you are in dire need of
Speaker 2: a new computer. And you know, I've been using this
Speaker 2: computer for probably seven years. I'm thinking the time just
Speaker 2: goes so fast. I'm not one of these people who
Speaker 2: goes out to you know, you take those surveys and
Speaker 2: they say, are you the first to Are you the
Speaker 2: type of person who's the first to adopt a new technology?
Speaker 2: You know, I'm like the last to do that. So
Speaker 2: I will use something as long as I can, you know,
Speaker 2: I try to get the most bang for the buck.
Speaker 2: Like our car, it's a two thousand and seven Chrysler
Speaker 2: PACIFICA and it's got like it's about to hit I think,
Speaker 2: two hundred and forty thousand miles, but it runs and
Speaker 2: there's no car payments and it's reliable. So the same
Speaker 2: with my computer. But it gets to a point where
Speaker 2: obviously you've got as much as many miles out of
Speaker 2: them as you can, as you know, as both of
Speaker 2: you guys know. And so we're at that point now.
Speaker 2: And so when you and I talked about that recently,
Speaker 2: you know, when that was brought to my attention, I
Speaker 2: wanted to make a special plea to your listeners to
Speaker 2: help you. Because one of the things about what Daniel
Speaker 2: does as the listeners I'm sure know, and what the
Speaker 2: other hosts do, is not done to get rich or
Speaker 2: to make money. It's done because there's something inside of
Speaker 2: each one of us that needs to get out. We
Speaker 2: need to get this information out, and that's really what
Speaker 2: motivates us. I know that motivates me, and I'm pretty
Speaker 2: sure that's what motivates Daniel. So we're not doing it
Speaker 2: for money. It's not like we, you know, grew up
Speaker 2: and said, well, you know, Johnny, what do you want
Speaker 2: to be when you grow up? You know, I want
Speaker 2: to be a I want to be an internet radio host. Yeah. No,
Speaker 2: So you just get to that point and once you're there,
Speaker 2: you realize what you have to do. And one of
Speaker 2: the most important parts of putting on these types of
Speaker 2: shows is the technology that accompanies the host. And so
Speaker 2: in this case, Daniel really needs a computer and it's
Speaker 2: a modest computer. He's going to build it himself, and
Speaker 2: the goal is eighteen hundred dollars, which to some people
Speaker 2: I guess isn't a lot. To others, it's a lot
Speaker 2: of money. I know, I don't have eighteen hundred dollars
Speaker 2: in my pocket. I probably have like twenty five dollars
Speaker 2: cash in my pocket. So this is very important. And Daniel,
Speaker 2: it's a give send go site where they can make
Speaker 2: that donation, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: The description of the video is it's gives and dot
Speaker 1: com backslash and then the show name, which is B
Speaker 1: A A L B U S T E R S.
Speaker 2: That's so easy. Is there any way you can put
Speaker 2: it up on the screen?
Speaker 5: Sure, let me go ahead and click and then one
Speaker 5: second presents Yeah, there we go, you know, yeah, sorry,
Speaker 5: there it.
Speaker 2: Is all right awesome, So I think, uh you're about
Speaker 2: halfway there roughly. I don't know, but I think that's
Speaker 2: that's about right. So all you need is another nine
Speaker 2: hundred dollars uh to do it. So uh, you know,
Speaker 2: coupled with this this drive, this modest drive that Daniels running,
Speaker 2: is the fact that, uh, these stations like F t
Speaker 2: J Media or any of them out there, they are
Speaker 2: listener supported, non commercial because obviously they are not going
Speaker 2: to be companies lining up to advertise on these stations.
Speaker 2: Just got a notification about I think it was on
Speaker 2: telegram from someone let me just look it up, see
Speaker 2: if I'm right, because this is what happens. Yeah, so
Speaker 2: sky News presenter, a Sky News presenter, Belle Danati, is
Speaker 2: axed by broadcaster after she compared Israel's campaign in Gaza
Speaker 2: to the Holocaust. And that's today, September eleventh. So that's
Speaker 2: on I guess Sky News or any of these other outlets.
Speaker 2: So the point is is that in this case here
Speaker 2: the Holocaust obviously, you know, as Daniel has talked about
Speaker 2: many times, that's their sacred ground because everything's based on
Speaker 2: them being the victims. And so as soon as this
Speaker 2: topic is breached by someone in a position of influence
Speaker 2: like a broadcaster, a talking head, as soon as they
Speaker 2: don't show it the proper respect that the Jew is demanding,
Speaker 2: then they order whoever is in charge of in this
Speaker 2: case Sky News to get rid of this person. And
Speaker 2: of course they have no power. It's just conspiracy theory,
Speaker 2: like white replacement theory, another conspiracy theory. So and I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: the phone's ringing, so I will ignore that, but I
Speaker 2: turn the ringer off. So with these type of stations,
Speaker 2: we can say those things, but the consequence of saying
Speaker 2: those things is that we're not going to have any advertisers,
Speaker 2: so we all depend on the listeners to support the
Speaker 2: hosts and the station. And I've said this before. The
Speaker 2: station isn't in existence to make money. The station is
Speaker 2: in existence to support the hosts because the hosts are
Speaker 2: the ones who allow the station to exist. You know,
Speaker 2: it's just like I guess the most basic you know
Speaker 2: phrase that you hear. You know, without without customers, a
Speaker 2: company wouldn't exist. Yeah, that's true, and why these companies
Speaker 2: treat the customers like shit. So it's the same thing
Speaker 2: with FTJ. Without the hosts, FTJ wouldn't exist. So I
Speaker 2: would hope that some of the listeners today listening to
Speaker 2: me right now, listening to the show, will go to
Speaker 2: that gift single link and make a nice donation to Daniel.
Speaker 2: His work is very unique and he's an author as well.
Speaker 2: If you haven't gotten his book, get his book and
Speaker 2: his sauce. But most importantly, he really needs that computer
Speaker 2: because this one is really on its last legs. So
Speaker 2: please go to that gifts and go link and if
Speaker 2: you can give it a nice donation and let's see
Speaker 2: if we can knock this out today so he could
Speaker 2: get those parts and start building it. And you know,
Speaker 2: any donation is fine, really five dollars, ten dollars, but
Speaker 2: if you can and you feel like you're able to
Speaker 2: do it, a larger donation will help us get there quicker.
Speaker 2: So thank you for listening to what I had to say.
Speaker 2: And I hope that this campaign is successful today and
Speaker 2: you can get those parts and get that new technology going.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Dave, appreciate your time. Thank you
Speaker 1: for your continued support and you know encouragement too. That's invaluable.
Speaker 1: And I would love to have you on for a
Speaker 1: full time show sometime in the future.
Speaker 2: Anytime, Yeah, anytime.
Speaker 1: Just let me know, Daniel, right, and we maybe we
Speaker 1: can introduce you to the guys when you have more
Speaker 1: time to absolutely sure.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I just have a busy day today, and
Speaker 2: you know it's many of the days are you know,
Speaker 2: famili or like that. But you know, I wanted to
Speaker 2: set time aside for this because this is really important.
Speaker 2: I want to see you have the right computer, the
Speaker 2: right technology to be able to do the things that
Speaker 2: you do without having to struggle. And that's what it
Speaker 2: is right now. It's a struggle, uh, you know, and
Speaker 2: and it's not good. It's it's just not good to
Speaker 2: struggle because we are uh, you know.
Speaker 1: Take the focus off of what you're doing, so focus.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And we're in a war. Uh. We are in
Speaker 2: a war. Uh. And and this isn't like you know,
Speaker 2: you know, like a joke or anything like or or
Speaker 2: you know, just some sort of a you know, a
Speaker 2: phrase that sounds good. You know, we are in a war.
Speaker 2: We are in a war, and they want us dead.
Speaker 2: Facts absolutely faster now more than ever. So thank you again,
Speaker 2: Daniel and Diego Garcia. Nice to meet you and all
Speaker 2: of your listeners. Thank you for allowing me to say this.
Speaker 2: And I bid you farewell and hope you have a
Speaker 2: wonderful show.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much.
Speaker 6: Dave.
Speaker 1: That was Dave Gaherry, founder of FDJ Media, Money Tree
Speaker 1: Publishing and formerly SFR. We have Nicodemus is in the house. Nicodemus.
Speaker 3: Hey, Bud, Hey, whoa.
Speaker 4: Good to have you on man.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, here you could make.
Speaker 1: It okay, So before we get into it, because I
Speaker 1: know you guys have a lot of stuff prepared. There's
Speaker 1: gonna be a lot of great information here. It would
Speaker 1: be very uncool if we didn't at least address and
Speaker 1: acknowledge what today is, and that is September eleventh, obviously, right,
Speaker 1: So in honor of that, I did wear this shirt today.
Speaker 1: Bill Cooper was right because he did in the very
Speaker 1: beginning I tackle this. He was on air for eight
Speaker 1: to ten hours that day giving us the reports, and
Speaker 1: you know, he lived the life. He dedicated himself to it,
Speaker 1: and he lost his life in the process. So to
Speaker 1: Bill and to everybody who lost a family member into
Speaker 1: the victims there of the Massad Israel joint operation with
Speaker 1: the CIA, FBI and our government murdering Americans on our
Speaker 1: own soil. Let that sink in when we're celebrating and
Speaker 1: supporting any candidate or anybody else who's all in with
Speaker 1: Israel genocide of Palestine. At the moment they murdered three
Speaker 1: thousand people will give or take in our country on
Speaker 1: nine to eleven. They did it, and that should tell
Speaker 1: you who actually runs our country to and who was like,
Speaker 1: what's really going on here? Okay, now that we've addressed that, guys,
Speaker 1: take it away. Man, I forget I just.
Speaker 3: Hey, watching you guys before before we get too far
Speaker 3: off of that. Daniel, I got a question, correct me
Speaker 3: if I'm wrong, But wasn't The original raid date for
Speaker 3: Bill Cooper September supposed to be nine to eleven, and
Speaker 3: they missed because he was in a different studio broadcasting
Speaker 3: covering the tragedy.
Speaker 1: No, no, the the the warrant or whatever the bs
Speaker 1: they had was supposed to be for that date, and
Speaker 1: because of what happened, they pushed it up. I don't think.
Speaker 3: Okay, yeah, I got you. Yeah, and then it wind
Speaker 3: up being remember remember the fifth.
Speaker 2: Of November, right.
Speaker 1: Interestingly enough, it's all it's all mm hmm, just to
Speaker 1: put their signature on it that Hey, it's the Jesuit.
Speaker 1: So the Jews who did this to you? Take that?
Speaker 3: Just wanted to make sure I was getting that correct.
Speaker 1: Exactly, all right, So diego. Yeah, you guys, You guys,
Speaker 1: you and Nick have been coordinating for a question of time,
Speaker 1: and this the man in the field is Nicodemus with
Speaker 1: this continuation of what's going on and what the hell
Speaker 1: happened to America and by whom did it happen? You know?
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna let you guys jump in. I'm I'll
Speaker 1: be here for for garnish and let you guys you know, yeah.
Speaker 4: Well, well I think that We're going to continue down
Speaker 4: this wrote a research into the scientific expert. Now it's
Speaker 4: governing our society. But you know, Nick and I have
Speaker 4: been talking a lot in the last couple of days. Sorry,
Speaker 4: and you know, we've uncovered a bunch more interesting stuff
Speaker 4: related to brand Eyes but also to Lincoln and brand
Speaker 4: Eise and you know, some incredibly groundbreaking stuff if true.
Speaker 4: So we are entering a little bit of speculation when
Speaker 4: we talk about the relationship between brand Eyes and Lincoln.
Speaker 4: Brand Eise is born in Lincoln, Louisville. Sorry, there's a
Speaker 4: whole other realm in Lincoln, Nebraska too that we've sort
Speaker 4: of uncovered. The origins of social science and the Brandises.
Speaker 4: There's a whole other sect of brandises in Omaha, and
Speaker 4: they're opening up department chains, department store chains.
Speaker 1: Got to have the funding, got to have the money.
Speaker 4: And it's materialism. So you can see that they're adding
Speaker 4: an aspect. This is one of the ways that they
Speaker 4: were going to control the West was through our addiction
Speaker 4: to materialistic you know, pursuits and such.
Speaker 1: Yeah, acrupetizing is the is a it's a weapon against
Speaker 1: small business entrepreneurship. Yeah, unlimited funding, they can fail upward.
Speaker 1: They can take losses that other small businesses can, so
Speaker 1: they can steal the market underneath them, you know, from
Speaker 1: underneath them.
Speaker 4: So maybe I'll just take a minute here and sort
Speaker 4: of tell everybody what we what I've discovered, and then
Speaker 4: Nick can take it from there.
Speaker 1: I don't think FTJ media is playing. I'm just going
Speaker 1: to back out, go ahead, I'm just going to okay, sure.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Because Brandeis is born in eighteen fifty six and
Speaker 4: Lincoln is assassinated in eighteen sixty five. So there's there's
Speaker 4: a period of time, a significant period of time, where
Speaker 4: Lincoln and brand Dies overlap, their lives overlap, and when
Speaker 4: you have a look at the two pictures of brand
Speaker 4: Eyes and Lincoln together, which I've studied quite a bit lately,
Speaker 4: there is some some undeniable similarities in their facial structures
Speaker 4: and the fact that the brandizes the Whales W E
Speaker 4: H l e last name, and the dembits is. We're
Speaker 4: all coordinated in this three family transfer from the Prague
Speaker 4: area of Europe to the you know, the West and
Speaker 4: specifically the midwest of America. This is where they were
Speaker 4: targeting because the Midwest is open to progressive ideas, at
Speaker 4: this time. It's more progressive than the Eastern establishment, for sure.
Speaker 4: This is what their game plan was. This is how
Speaker 4: they went into the belly of the beast, literally went
Speaker 4: into America and ratted it from the inside out. Many
Speaker 4: of your viewers and listeners would know this, but we're
Speaker 4: showing exactly how. So all I'm saying in this is
Speaker 4: speculation that there is a distinct possibility that Brandeis is
Speaker 4: actually the son of Abraham Lincoln. Because you know, we're
Speaker 4: we're talking about a Francs Millieu. We're talking about an
Speaker 4: Antinomian movement of people coming over that are allegedly, you know,
Speaker 4: participating in all kinds of anti moral taboo social topics.
Speaker 4: But they're also apparently having sex with their own daughters
Speaker 4: and orgies and you know, all of those kinds of things.
Speaker 4: And so is it a reach to say that Brandei's
Speaker 4: quite possibly could be Lincoln's son and that Lincoln was
Speaker 4: rising at that.
Speaker 1: Time, or even you know, just a relative.
Speaker 4: Or a nephew or a double nephew, like we see
Speaker 4: so much, right, I think we have a pretty distinct
Speaker 4: But then again, like you said, they do life swap
Speaker 4: and all this other stuff too.
Speaker 1: Frankis. So even if indirectly, you know he had a
Speaker 1: quote unquote father, because that that you can we can
Speaker 1: pin down that Brandeis certainly had a distinct father God, yes, right,
Speaker 1: but in and you know the advanced age of Lincoln
Speaker 1: at the time he goes maybe not, maybe that could
Speaker 1: have still been a thing.
Speaker 4: Yea, it could still be a thing. And we look
Speaker 4: at Bill Clinton or William blythe the third is his
Speaker 4: real name, and his daughter and her similarities, and then
Speaker 4: you look at the royal family and the princes, and
Speaker 4: there's an odd redhead in there. So we see often that,
Speaker 4: you know, the mainstream telling of what is going on
Speaker 4: is obviously fake when you take a look for yourself
Speaker 4: and view these people that we're talking about. And so
Speaker 4: the other thing that I want to mention here is
Speaker 4: that Louis Brandeis, he's the leader of Zionism. He changes
Speaker 4: his middle name late in his life too to Dembitz
Speaker 4: in honor of his uncle, who is one of the
Speaker 4: earliest Zionists. Eighteen fifties or so. He's involved in this
Speaker 4: congregation of Hebrew and Christian followers, so he's bringing them together.
Speaker 4: And this is Frederica's brother This is Lewis Brandeis's uncle,
Speaker 4: and he is in Lincoln's administration. He's part of Lincoln's cabinet.
Speaker 4: So this is why I'm saying it's all there, it's
Speaker 4: all available. The only thing that we haven't been able
Speaker 4: to determine is whether Lincoln was in that area Louisville,
Speaker 4: nine months prior to Brandei's being born. Now that is
Speaker 4: an election year, eighteen fifty six, and Lincoln is traveling
Speaker 4: around America doing speeches. We just I haven't had time
Speaker 4: to confirm any of that yet. And if anybody's out
Speaker 4: there that has some time, research and try to find
Speaker 4: me where Abraham Lincoln was nine months prior to Brandi's
Speaker 4: being born, and then I'll leave it to Nick because
Speaker 4: I know Nick you have some time constraints.
Speaker 3: So yeah, yeah, that's actually that's one of the things
Speaker 3: that I was going to try to track down when
Speaker 3: I head back to the place that we had talked about,
Speaker 3: was there's a vast collection of stuff on Lincoln there,
Speaker 3: and excuse me, I'm going to try to if it's
Speaker 3: anything it's if it's set up anything like LdB stuff,
Speaker 3: then it should have handwritten letters, correspondence with different people
Speaker 3: all dated and chronologically ordered. So that's what I'm going
Speaker 3: to be looking at specifically next time and trying to
Speaker 3: place him in that timeframe.
Speaker 4: Yeah, beautiful.
Speaker 1: You know what's significant that in the works. Yeah. What's
Speaker 1: significant about what you said about them bringing the Christians
Speaker 1: in on this is that string of the Frankists becoming
Speaker 1: what we now call Zionists, and that Christian Zionism, those
Speaker 1: brethrens that I've discussed over and over again that were
Speaker 1: denight Frankist that had had baptized and converted quoting quote so.
Speaker 4: And this details perfectly with the dispensational movement, you know.
Speaker 4: And Louis Brandize his son in law as the father
Speaker 4: of the Social Gospel, and his great grandson today is
Speaker 4: the president of the Interfaith Alliance.
Speaker 1: It's it's almost too obvious, isn't it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Yeah, that's wild. I'm also glad you brought up
Speaker 3: Bill Clinton just for the simple fact of him being
Speaker 3: from Arkansas. And one of the things that we've been
Speaker 3: looking at also is the Albert Pike letters to Mazzini.
Speaker 3: And one of the things that I talked with both
Speaker 3: of you about is how there's a phrase that Mazzini
Speaker 3: uses that is very similar to how the progressives called
Speaker 3: everything the new freedom, the new Gospel, the new this,
Speaker 3: the new that. When the Maszini letters he refers to
Speaker 3: everything as the young, the young Turks specifically among other groups,
Speaker 3: but he he prefaces it all with young instead of new,
Speaker 3: which when you think about it, it's really a synonym
Speaker 3: for each other.
Speaker 4: Yes, and we see that today. Trudeau and all of
Speaker 4: these leaders that are going on right now, they're all
Speaker 4: part of the the youth. I don't know who it
Speaker 4: was that lined them all up. Was this to do
Speaker 4: with the close schwab and the great reset and such?
Speaker 4: Was putting these people like Macron and here in Canada
Speaker 4: Trudeau in charge? And they're all considered the young something
Speaker 4: or older I can't remember, young leader, young global leaders.
Speaker 3: Yep, that's exactly it. And the reason we started looking
Speaker 3: at the Albert Pike Mazzini letters is just for the
Speaker 3: simple fact that he predicted three world wars, he predicted
Speaker 3: who they would be between. And some people like to say, oh, well,
Speaker 3: those letters are a fraud. Whatever it's happening, whether it
Speaker 3: was a order, whether it's authentic, Are they correct? Are
Speaker 3: those things unfolded in front of us? As we speak.
Speaker 1: Yes, they say the same thing about those place is
Speaker 1: that not in effect? I mean?
Speaker 4: And that in itself makes them important to consider.
Speaker 3: Agreed.
Speaker 1: Oh and just just to touch on when you brought
Speaker 1: up the Young Turks, just as a reminder to everybody
Speaker 1: else out there too, that the leaders of the Young
Speaker 1: Turks with a Don Mug which was a Sabot, and
Speaker 1: Francis who converted to quit his mom and they were
Speaker 1: the ones leading the charge and getting all the Muslims
Speaker 1: riled up to kill a million or so Armitian Christians.
Speaker 4: Yes, the Holocaust that we don't actually ever talk about.
Speaker 3: Well one of them. There's also the hola domer that
Speaker 3: we don't ever talk about either, which is Ukraine. Again.
Speaker 4: And one other thing I wanted to add to that
Speaker 4: regarding Brandi's Lincoln and his mother. Lincoln's mother's maiden name
Speaker 4: is Hanks, and he is a direct relative of Tom Hanks.
Speaker 4: And Tom Hanks was born exactly one hundred years after
Speaker 4: Louis browande Is in nineteen fifty six. Are you interesting
Speaker 4: information for you?
Speaker 1: Wow?
Speaker 4: And that's admitted. Tom Hanks will admit that to you,
Speaker 4: that he's a direct descendant of Abraham Lincoln.
Speaker 3: It's also interesting to look at where they settle geographically,
Speaker 3: not just for the way of people thinking at the
Speaker 3: time and then being able to slide some of the
Speaker 3: more progressive stuff in, but the resources in those areas.
Speaker 3: So if you were looking to say, set up and
Speaker 3: supply a war, a war machine, a country for war,
Speaker 3: you would set up somewhere where it was plentiful with
Speaker 3: let's say, saltpeter for making gunpowder, someplace that was plentiful
Speaker 3: with coal for fuel or wood for building barracks and equipment.
Speaker 3: You'd set up someplace that had easy access to a
Speaker 3: river so you could ship the goods back and forth
Speaker 3: and supplies. And that's basically here. Yeah, I mean it's
Speaker 3: this is definitely war central if they were looking for
Speaker 3: supplies back then. As far as the way things were
Speaker 3: done in that era, I mean, Mammoth Cave is.
Speaker 4: A huge saltpeter uh depot deposit.
Speaker 3: I mean that that's that's why people started going into
Speaker 3: it to get saltpeter out of it to make gunpowder.
Speaker 1: Right, So the same thing that that uh that stifles
Speaker 1: your manhood is what they use in gunpowder. That's something
Speaker 1: trivia fact there.
Speaker 3: It's it's one of the things, right.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Uh, Louisville very interesting it in that aspect that
Speaker 4: it's geographical location and the river, the Ohio River going
Speaker 4: right through there. I was looking at the map last night,
Speaker 4: just trying to wrap my head around the area, and yep,
Speaker 4: it's and this is really what was going on in
Speaker 4: the day all over America, right, They were establishing rail lines,
Speaker 4: not necessarily for transporting people on their holidays, but to
Speaker 4: extract natural resources from all over America in order to
Speaker 4: build war material and war machine. This is really the
Speaker 4: legacy of the rail lines in America that nobody talks about.
Speaker 4: But it's obvious when you look at the chronology that
Speaker 4: a lot of these were built directly to transport natural
Speaker 4: resources coming out of mines.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 1: There's a perfect example of one that kind of failed
Speaker 1: too in Death Valley that it was created specifically for that,
Speaker 1: and then they meled it one hundred fifty miles because
Speaker 1: it was still too far away from the site for
Speaker 1: the borax back then.
Speaker 4: Right, And that establishes cities, establishes America. Uh, and according
Speaker 4: to their natural resources, this is how the cities were
Speaker 4: really created.
Speaker 3: I found out Jacob Schiff was down here as well
Speaker 3: for a period of time.
Speaker 4: Yeah, what was he doing?
Speaker 1: Dater next time.
Speaker 3: Checking in on his investments with Ellen and railroad Louisville
Speaker 3: and Nashville.
Speaker 1: Right right, and Rockefeller was standard Railroad right.
Speaker 3: And then you look at the Flexner's being here and
Speaker 3: drafting the Flexing report for Rockefeller Medicine.
Speaker 4: Yep, yep, amazing.
Speaker 3: We've got a street here named after Flexner literally, and.
Speaker 4: Brand Eyes, I would assume as well.
Speaker 3: No, oh yeah, there's there's streets and schools and banners
Speaker 3: and everything.
Speaker 4: Banners on sides of buildings and pictures on walls. You've
Speaker 4: shown me. That's just an amazing thing. And this is
Speaker 4: really speaks to propaganda. I think, I really do believe this,
Speaker 4: that this is the era that is being gate kept.
Speaker 4: So we talk about limited hangouts and controlled opposition, gatekeepers,
Speaker 4: all of these phrases, But what is it that they're
Speaker 4: trying to hide from the general public. I think it
Speaker 4: is this this progressive angle that has infiltrated both sides
Speaker 4: of the political environment with so many I would say,
Speaker 4: all of your viewers and listeners know that the two
Speaker 4: party system is corrupt, but very few could tell you
Speaker 4: exactly why. Or how. And we are showing this that
Speaker 4: it is the progressive era that goes the third party
Speaker 4: goes right up the middle, discolors the blue and red
Speaker 4: into the same color purple, and they're basically just one
Speaker 4: giant uniparty with a bunch of flying monkeys. Yeah, a
Speaker 4: bunch of people that still believe in the validity of
Speaker 4: the two party system. It's crazy. Launch.
Speaker 1: The significance of the Civil War and Lincoln is that
Speaker 1: that paved the way. There was no more consent of
Speaker 1: the governed, and the debt that was incurred through that
Speaker 1: war brought us right back under the heel of the
Speaker 1: Rothschild and City of London bankers, and that gave them
Speaker 1: basically cart blanche to do whatever they wanted here. And
Speaker 1: then you started seeing everything build up in these corporations
Speaker 1: moving in and all this building of these with these
Speaker 1: roth Child agents, Morgan, you know, Rockefellers, all that creating
Speaker 1: what you're talking about right now. And that was the
Speaker 1: soft takeover or the beginning of it. And when you're
Speaker 1: talking about correct progressivism, it's not so much that they
Speaker 1: were hiding it. It's that they were hiding the true
Speaker 1: intent because they were selling it as liberation, just like
Speaker 1: Mason's do liberty, fraternity equality, and you know it's not
Speaker 1: when you understand the true intent of it, that's when
Speaker 1: it starts to make an impact. But the way it
Speaker 1: was sold was like, this is just evolution of mankind
Speaker 1: and civilization and this is the way to the future.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah, So Nico Dimas, if there's something you want to
Speaker 4: cover here, it's time sensitive before you got to go,
Speaker 4: maybe now is the time because I'm gonna get into
Speaker 4: Brandeis in DARPO.
Speaker 3: Okay, yeah, just real quick. And it kind of branches
Speaker 3: off what Daniel just said about the way things are
Speaker 3: sold and what you said about propaganda. Literally, the people
Speaker 3: who foment propaganda and basically, like you were saying in
Speaker 3: the last show last Wednesday, who set up Hollywood, they
Speaker 3: were people who sold things initially, and that's the way
Speaker 3: that they looked at the movies they were they were
Speaker 3: ways to sell things, sell products, to sell war as
Speaker 3: a product, if you think about it, really, at the
Speaker 3: end of the day, that was their specialty. So they
Speaker 3: just took it and put it on a screen, on
Speaker 3: the on the silver screen basically and sold it there
Speaker 3: everybody there. The documentary that that Wayne or Dwayne was
Speaker 3: citing was saying that people actually used to go to
Speaker 3: the movies once a week back then. I mean that's
Speaker 3: a direct feed, sure, y yeah, yeah. And you had
Speaker 3: the little what were they called war war shorts that
Speaker 3: they would show before every feature. Yep, you know, I
Speaker 3: mean you're selling war literally.
Speaker 4: And that is the Committee on Public Information, that is
Speaker 4: the first ever propaganda wing of the American government. And
Speaker 4: they tried to and they did successfully get all of
Speaker 4: Americans to go from non interventionalists to warmongers in four.
Speaker 1: Months, right by shaming them with this idea of isolationist
Speaker 1: and that's like some sort of primitive cave man.
Speaker 4: Yes like that, right, right, And this is the idea
Speaker 4: of progress that you have to keep up with the
Speaker 4: times or you're going to fall behind, become a luddite
Speaker 4: and an old man, and it's lost touch with time.
Speaker 4: This is the ultimate ridicule, right, because ridicule is a
Speaker 4: powerful form of logical fallacy. Right.
Speaker 1: They wanted to say that if you don't go that way,
Speaker 1: then you're just ignorant.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and motion picture when you think about it, up
Speaker 4: until the origins of Hollywood nineteen in the nineteen teens
Speaker 4: and nineteen twenties. All they could do for propaganda was
Speaker 4: paintings and posters and pictures. Nothing moved yet. But as
Speaker 4: soon as they found the magic of motion picture and
Speaker 4: being able to put pictures together it, and especially once
Speaker 4: they were able to put music and speaking to it,
Speaker 4: it became the most persuasive form of propaganda still to
Speaker 4: this day.
Speaker 1: There's a really weird history of that too. When you
Speaker 1: get into the World's Fairs and why all these isis
Speaker 1: theaters were here when apparently the technology hadn't come yet.
Speaker 1: That there was these motion pictures theaters like all over
Speaker 1: the place, and they were huge. Sometimes they seeded more
Speaker 1: people and then lived in the towns, and there's so
Speaker 1: there's there's some hidden history erased straight up from our
Speaker 1: technology and everything else. That's why I say that the
Speaker 1: World's Fairs were they were the like last Hurrah before
Speaker 1: they decided to take down to the old civilization. It
Speaker 1: was like a party, you know, so what we had
Speaker 1: because we're going to say we're going to get rid
Speaker 1: of it now.
Speaker 4: It's almost a primitive revelation of method. It's and they
Speaker 4: had architects and everybody. You know, Uh, I can't remember
Speaker 4: his name starts with a B. But he's a famous
Speaker 4: architect and he studied at Bozart in Paris or in France,
Speaker 4: and he was he was one of the ones that
Speaker 4: designed the World Fare at least in Chicago, but I
Speaker 4: think San Francisco too. And these are real really just
Speaker 4: from what I see and from my research, they are
Speaker 4: showing what the future is going to look like. There
Speaker 4: was no architecture like that that they were proposing in America.
Speaker 4: This neo classicalism right with the pills that looks like
Speaker 4: the Parthenon. This is what they were really representing it
Speaker 4: through Bose Art. And now all of our government buildings
Speaker 4: started by Woodrow Wilson and finished by FDR. When you look,
Speaker 4: all of the government buildings are all of a neo
Speaker 4: classical variation, right. Uh So those Worlds Fairs are very important.
Speaker 4: This is where the Ferris wheel comes from, and so
Speaker 4: much stuff that, uh, you know, I encourage people to
Speaker 4: go and look into those.
Speaker 3: Yeah. One more thing too, as far as the the
Speaker 3: documentary that you sent me to watch, there was something
Speaker 3: called the Edison Rules on motion pictures and they just
Speaker 3: made me think about it. Yeah, the Hayes Code there
Speaker 3: was the Hayes code, but there was something else to
Speaker 3: do with the name Edison. And when he spoke about
Speaker 3: the world's fairs, the world's fairs were lit by That's
Speaker 3: where Edison came to prominence, was with his light bulbs,
Speaker 3: or well somebody's light bulbs. That's that very know who
Speaker 3: you talk to. But that he's the one who got
Speaker 3: the credit for it.
Speaker 4: So yeah, in a lot of ways, we have to sorry,
Speaker 4: go ahead, No, I.
Speaker 3: Was just going to say, it's just an interesting connection.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I don't remember what I was gonna say. So, Brandeis,
Speaker 4: you know, is deeply involved in the these railway lines
Speaker 4: and setting precedent through UH Federal Supreme Court cases. He
Speaker 4: does this across the board in all aspects of our life.
Speaker 4: But we're talking about the rail lines. Brandeis is there.
Speaker 4: He's central to it all. Okay. And so just in
Speaker 4: the last couple of days, I want to say thank
Speaker 4: you to Mark Hodges and Patrick Nash because they asked,
Speaker 4: you know, they actually brought to my attention and I'm
Speaker 4: going to share it here that that the survey domestic
Speaker 4: surveillance program that the United States has instituted on us
Speaker 4: is actually named after brandece. Okay, so can you see that?
Speaker 1: Well, I get it.
Speaker 4: It's from the DARPA Dot Mill website.
Speaker 1: So that's it. So they're they're confirming that this is
Speaker 1: a brand ICE program.
Speaker 3: So yeah, you have it.
Speaker 4: Do you see that DARPA BRANDISE program aims to ensure
Speaker 4: online privacy through technology?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 4: Okay, beautiful, So here it is. They're they're admitting here
Speaker 4: that the domestic surveillance program that they have largely been
Speaker 4: allowed to create through nine to eleven really in a
Speaker 4: lot of ways, right, So it being nine to eleven today,
Speaker 4: it's at least yeah, it's yeah, it was obviously there before,
Speaker 4: but accelerated after. You know, we're all very aware of
Speaker 4: how much more difficult it became to travel after nine
Speaker 4: to eleven, and just how much of our personal privacy
Speaker 4: went out the window after nine to eleven, and so,
Speaker 4: you know, domestic surveillance definitely wrapped up. It was after
Speaker 4: nine eleven that we just started seeing everything being recorded
Speaker 4: by cameras.
Speaker 1: The Carnegie Midlligan Milan University, I see, but next to
Speaker 1: the doctor Sweeney thing, just that name Carnegie emil together
Speaker 1: is enough, you know.
Speaker 4: And so this originally was oh no, that's a different
Speaker 4: one because see brand Eise is so influential that we've
Speaker 4: got to get to the eugenics movement and forced sterilization here. Still,
Speaker 4: So I'm confusing two stories that we've just sort of
Speaker 4: found this last week. So here's one. This is amazing
Speaker 4: that Brandie is the name for the domestic surveillance program
Speaker 4: the United States is instituted on all of us because
Speaker 4: it's not.
Speaker 1: Just you know, online privacy through thericology and.
Speaker 4: Freaking, and so it's long been presented through brand Eye
Speaker 4: back in the day that this was for our personal privacy.
Speaker 1: This was posted twenty fifteen. Yeah, so this is not
Speaker 1: something that they're proposing now with the This is something
Speaker 1: that's already Yeah, we're just going to belished. They're just
Speaker 1: going to tighten the screws down it.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Oh boy, that's nice.
Speaker 4: So there's a link at the bottom people can share.
Speaker 4: I haven't actually linked on that. I was just wanting
Speaker 4: to share that that is really significant because brand Eye
Speaker 4: what we say, you know, we concluded he's the maker
Speaker 4: of our modern day social contract, and this is one
Speaker 4: of the reasons why because his rights to privacy. An
Speaker 4: article that he wrote in the Harvard Law Review. The
Speaker 4: Harvard Law Review he created himself three years prior to
Speaker 4: this article eighteen eighty seven. You can look it up everybody,
Speaker 4: and it is on our articles. You can find a
Speaker 4: bulletproofpub dot com. And yeah, he writes this writes to privacy,
Speaker 4: and it's largely written with the public in mind. So
Speaker 4: then we think that it's for our personal privacy. But
Speaker 4: now we can see one hundred years later, this is
Speaker 4: the greatness of hindsight, that we have televisions that maybe
Speaker 4: even watching me right now and recording everything I say,
Speaker 4: so we can say that maybe he had ambitious ideals,
Speaker 4: or that he didn't have malicious intent, but we see
Speaker 4: the conclusions of the ideas that he personally and primarily authored.
Speaker 1: Can I say something about that too, what you just
Speaker 1: mentioned in the middle of the COVID stuff. Let me
Speaker 1: put us back up. Something flashed on my compute on
Speaker 1: my phone, I'm not let me say it the right
Speaker 1: way on my TV in my bedroom, which is a
Speaker 1: visio it. I've never seen this type of pop up before.
Speaker 1: It was completely unique to itself, and it was talking
Speaker 1: about surveillance and telling me that it was going to
Speaker 1: be doing said thing. And I wanted to take a
Speaker 1: picture of it, and I tried to press a button
Speaker 1: and I lost it. It was gone and was gone,
Speaker 1: but it popped up on the screen and I couldn't
Speaker 1: believe it. It was basically telling me that monitoring And this
Speaker 1: is again during the whole you know, well they can
Speaker 1: wait hear me cough and then say that I have
Speaker 1: the kof you know what I mean? Like what was
Speaker 1: that all about? But uh yeah, it was pretty interesting
Speaker 1: and very very ominous. And I didn't see my other
Speaker 1: TV doing it because it wasn't not at the same time.
Speaker 1: Maybe it just flash screen, but I saw it. I
Speaker 1: saw it, and it was declaring and you know what
Speaker 1: do you call it discal ing that monitoring was going
Speaker 1: to occur?
Speaker 4: Wow?
Speaker 3: Yeah, well think about it. That that's literally the telescreens
Speaker 3: from nineteen eighty four with George orwell literally it's a
Speaker 3: scrying mirror.
Speaker 4: Well, it's even the World Order written by hdu L's
Speaker 4: whenever whatever year that was right?
Speaker 3: And who were they all? They all were.
Speaker 4: Fabian socialists, Fabian socialists and progressives. Yeah, Fabians and progressives
Speaker 4: that were socialists, but they were hiding it behind fancy names.
Speaker 4: This is what they admit. Walter Lippman Herbert Crowley, two
Speaker 4: of the founders of progressivesm admit that it is socialism
Speaker 4: that they are pushing. They just couldn't use the word.
Speaker 3: Oh. Speaking of the letter that Albert Pike was writing
Speaker 3: to Mazzini, Mazzini was a huge Fabian socialist.
Speaker 4: M ooh, that's interesting, yep.
Speaker 3: And that also reminds me. Have you told Daniel about
Speaker 3: the letter that you found from was it Mars to
Speaker 3: Lincoln or Lincoln?
Speaker 4: We're getting there. That is going to be something we're
Speaker 4: going to cover here today.
Speaker 1: So in this in this book too, I actually brought
Speaker 1: up Mazzini because although everybody argued with me, mafia was
Speaker 1: an acronym and began with the French and their invasion
Speaker 1: of Sicily and the Italians saying enough is enough, and
Speaker 1: it was a battle cry basically. And then when Mazzini
Speaker 1: took took the reins, he took the old the old moniker,
Speaker 1: the old acronym, and made it Missini author authorize or authorizes, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, death, murdered, whatever, robbery, whatever, whatever the bad
Speaker 1: stuff is, to cause chaos, to cause upheaval, you know,
Speaker 1: to be subversive, and that was directly in line with
Speaker 1: the plans that he and Pike were discussing. So just
Speaker 1: throwing that out there.
Speaker 4: Okay, you got something, Nick, because I can go somewhere
Speaker 4: here now.
Speaker 3: Actually I think I'm gonna go in and jump off here.
Speaker 3: I got to move around a little bit, and uh yeah,
Speaker 3: So y'all take it from here, and I'll be listening
Speaker 3: in the background.
Speaker 1: Awesome, if you can jump back in, we'll here, you know.
Speaker 3: Yep, all right, I appreciate it. Good to talk fellas.
Speaker 1: Yep, thank you, Dick.
Speaker 3: Be safe, have a good show.
Speaker 4: Thank you. So Nick mentions these letters. So we've uncovered
Speaker 4: this this week, and I'm sure other people have. It's
Speaker 4: just this is where our research is. Letters between marks.
Speaker 4: Can you see that?
Speaker 1: Sorry, I was looking at something else, but I'll put
Speaker 1: it up right now and let me make it so.
Speaker 4: The Address of the International working Men's Association to Abraham Lincoln,
Speaker 4: President of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Yep, no, we see it now, okay, So.
Speaker 4: Presented to US Ambassador Charles Francis Adams, January twenty eight,
Speaker 4: eighteen sixty five. So you can see here. I mean,
Speaker 4: these are the this is the best source I can
Speaker 4: find it this point, okay, but it's first published in
Speaker 4: the Beehive newspaper.
Speaker 1: That's Masonic right there.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Nick jumped all over that when he saw it,
Speaker 4: and so you can see. I invite every ready to
Speaker 4: go and read these for yourself. But they Marx is
Speaker 4: congratulating Lincoln on the things that he's accomplishing in the
Speaker 4: United States. And it is our hypothesis, or at least
Speaker 4: mine personally, that the emancipation of the slaves was really
Speaker 4: just to amalgamate all of us human beings, no matter
Speaker 4: creed or color, into one giant prison population, of course,
Speaker 4: and then they could tax the black just like they
Speaker 4: were the white, and you know, just it became a
Speaker 4: far easier way to do business for these guys.
Speaker 1: Less than four and a half percent of the South
Speaker 1: owned slaves at the time of the war. Right, So
Speaker 1: it wasn't they were under Jefferson I'm sorry, Jefferson Davis.
Speaker 1: They were already in the process of doing what they
Speaker 1: were being forced to do through Lincoln. They were already
Speaker 1: doing it themselves, right, And who brought them over in
Speaker 1: the first place, the same banks that then decided that
Speaker 1: they were going to use that as a tool to
Speaker 1: divide right, because it was the Rothschilds and basically the
Speaker 1: Dutch and all that stuff was controlled by the same
Speaker 1: merchants and bandits and thieves that we talked about all
Speaker 1: the time on here yep.
Speaker 4: So there's a direct connection. There's communication going on between
Speaker 4: Marx and Lincoln at around the time of the First International,
Speaker 4: and we've gone back this far at least to say
Speaker 4: that this is where the Paris Peace Conference of nineteen
Speaker 4: nineteen had its origins. This is you know, that is
Speaker 4: what Gregory Bateson called the greatest sellout in human history,
Speaker 4: the Paris nineteen nineteen Peace Conference, because of the Treaty
Speaker 4: o Versailles and all of those things. But there's a
Speaker 4: direct when you follow from the First International, of which
Speaker 4: Marks was there, he was present. This is largely initiated
Speaker 4: by him. He's a journalist at the time. This is
Speaker 4: the birth of internationalism. But they had, you know, from
Speaker 4: eighteen forty eight and the publishing of the Communist Manifesto
Speaker 4: until nineteen nineteen is min seventy something years. So you
Speaker 4: can see that there's through the First, Third, Second and
Speaker 4: Third Internationals into meetings at the Hague and you know,
Speaker 4: these other places in nineteen oh seven eighteen ninety nine,
Speaker 4: inspired by Theodore Roosevelt himself the first progressive Okay, so
Speaker 4: you see that this is actually internationalism. This is where
Speaker 4: I started to say, communism isn't actually a thing. No,
Speaker 4: it's actually internationalism. They are disguising here. So nobody can
Speaker 4: deny the influence of internationalism today. It's pretty much the
Speaker 4: number one overarching influence that we have in our lives.
Speaker 1: What always strikes me, and I think it's interesting, is
Speaker 1: that even people who are on the other side of things,
Speaker 1: that know that these things are they're own doing that
Speaker 1: caused these issues in the first place, like let's say
Speaker 1: slavery for instance, or anything like that, they're never they're
Speaker 1: never caught talking about the scam that they're pulling. They're
Speaker 1: always talking as if it's a real thing, and they're
Speaker 1: always saying it as if it's like it's like they're
Speaker 1: using a keynote mind word type of tactics where they're
Speaker 1: there's they're they're playing a what do you call it,
Speaker 1: a lifetime acting role, like lifetime actors, Like even though
Speaker 1: they're in the note that this is by their own hand,
Speaker 1: they're still acting as if they're fighting against some kind
Speaker 1: of oppression and selling it to that so that even
Speaker 1: it's like it's like a code in of itself because
Speaker 1: they know. Yet, if anybody ever comes across this material
Speaker 1: that's been written, they'll see it as, oh, these people
Speaker 1: at least had intent that was this way and it's
Speaker 1: so so devious.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and a lot of it was orchestrated through the
Speaker 4: noble lie and the unattainable ideal. You know, we talk
Speaker 4: about utopianism, the great society, industrial democracy, the socialistic vision
Speaker 4: of the future that's going to be perfect. You know,
Speaker 4: it's it's this is socialism, but you can see that
Speaker 4: they're putting it underneath nice sounding words. And you know,
Speaker 4: today progressivism is very influential on us. This idea that
Speaker 4: humans always must be moving forward, the theory of evolution
Speaker 4: is contributed to this, and then positivism.
Speaker 1: So these people have to create their own history because
Speaker 1: you didn't have one. Yeah, So they got got the
Speaker 1: reigns of finance or you know, worldwide finance. Everything changed everything.
Speaker 1: Our perception of history is completely inverted, surprisingly inverted. And
Speaker 1: you know, I'm reading a book right now called Makers
Speaker 1: of Civilization by La Waddell and he's doing the translations,
Speaker 1: and he's saying, like, up until like twelve hundred BC, Samaria, Babylon,
Speaker 1: all Persia, Egypt, those are all Scythian area and run.
Speaker 1: It was a corruption of that and then a soft
Speaker 1: takeover sometimes. And even even though they call themselves goot
Speaker 1: By back then as in goth as far back as
Speaker 1: you know, three thousand BC, so we know who they were,
Speaker 1: they just totally flipped that over and said everything was Semitic.
Speaker 1: They were their little confounder is a creation of civilization. Right,
Speaker 1: let's sell that lie because now we're indebted to them
Speaker 1: for everything that we've got, right.
Speaker 2: So.
Speaker 4: We'll move on here. You know, the marks d to
Speaker 4: Abraham Lincoln shows a link between Marxism and you know,
Speaker 4: one of the most lauded leaders in American history. Right,
Speaker 4: these are these two names are synonymous with the movements
Speaker 4: that they created. And so much like they translated the
Speaker 4: principles of scientific management and into every language, starting with
Speaker 4: Russian and Chinese, so that now Lenin Stalin could then
Speaker 4: orchestrate their own agenda of the perfectibility of man. Right,
Speaker 4: this scientific amalgamation of man and machine together, this is
Speaker 4: the Yeah, this is the rudimentary first steps of transhumanism
Speaker 4: AI surveillance. Right now, we're seeing it. It's being proven
Speaker 4: because the DARPA program is called brand Eise.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And you know, it's funny, like two slices if you
Speaker 1: talk about sandwich, right, two slices of bread, the top
Speaker 1: and the bottom lie eugenics, transhumanism, yeah, everything else.
Speaker 4: Okay, So that's a great transition, okay, because it's come
Speaker 4: to my surprise here or my attention, and it shocked
Speaker 4: me that Brandeis is also involved in the eugenics movement,
Speaker 4: and much like he establishes president in the railway, he
Speaker 4: establishes forced sterilization on us through this Buck versus Bell. Now,
Speaker 4: I think I can click on that and it should
Speaker 4: come up right yep. Okay, So there you go. And
Speaker 4: they don't necessarily mention Brandeis in here, but they mentioned
Speaker 4: everybody else, including Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior, who is a
Speaker 4: member of the House of Truth. He's the most honored,
Speaker 4: lauded guest there. He is the person that they infiltrated,
Speaker 4: they exploited, just like they exploited Woodrow Wilson. They did
Speaker 4: the same with Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior. He is today
Speaker 4: one of the few names that a large portion of
Speaker 4: the American population will know when asked, Hey, name me
Speaker 4: a US Supreme Court justice. Now him brandeis Frankfurter. They're
Speaker 4: considered in the top five to ten of all time
Speaker 4: US Supreme Court justices. They're all progressives. They all came
Speaker 4: with an agenda that was handed down from their fathers
Speaker 4: and their fathers fathers before them. Oliver Wendel Holmes Junior
Speaker 4: a part of the metaphysical club. This is where they
Speaker 4: bring in German philosophy. Hegel German. But need to yeah,
Speaker 4: but this is where you talk about the changing of history.
Speaker 4: This is the changing of history. Was happened. Happened as
Speaker 4: a as a result of the overall changing of culture.
Speaker 4: History is just an aspect of our overall culture. Well,
Speaker 4: they changed our entire culture, flipped what we value, and
Speaker 4: they flipped our traditions here in the West and largely
Speaker 4: today are what we think is our culture is largely
Speaker 4: a Jewish made up illusion. YEP. So Oliver Wendell Holmes
Speaker 4: is the guy that that is that writes this landmark
Speaker 4: decision of the United States Supreme Court, in which the
Speaker 4: Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of
Speaker 4: the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, for the protection and
Speaker 4: health of the state, did not violate the due process
Speaker 4: clause of the fourteenth Amendment of the United States. So
Speaker 4: this opened up the sterilization of the feeble minded.
Speaker 1: That's one step away from in fantaside being Okay.
Speaker 4: Sure you know and you know what happens in this
Speaker 4: same movement, but abortion, right, all these same people are involved.
Speaker 4: And so a little further down they even mentioned Felix Frankfurter,
Speaker 4: who we know now is probably the prime lieutenant of Brandeis.
Speaker 4: So again here we see brand Eyes hiding in the shadows.
Speaker 4: He's really steering narratives, directing what has to happen. But
Speaker 4: because he's a US Supreme Court justice, he tries to
Speaker 4: stay out of these politically polarizing situations. Although now one
Speaker 4: hundred years later, we as historians are already to uncover
Speaker 4: this whole movement. Okay, so we talk about eugenics and
Speaker 4: the four sterilization of the feeble minded, Well, how did
Speaker 4: this actually get legislated? Will our good buddy Louis Brandise.
Speaker 4: Once again, Buck versus Bell. So again I encourage people
Speaker 4: to go to these sites, learn a little bit more,
Speaker 4: see how they use the language to fool us, because
Speaker 4: it is progressive language today, build back better. You know,
Speaker 4: all of these terms. Hillary Clinton with the her logo,
Speaker 4: with the H with the arrow going left to right,
Speaker 4: this is all progressive sloganry. It's, you know, familiar if
Speaker 4: you're initiated into what it means that we're talking about
Speaker 4: how the progressive era infiltrated the United States.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I was looking at my Instagram a long long
Speaker 1: time ago. I dropped the post they give us with
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty elections. It could have been twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: I don't know what it is, but anyway, I think it
Speaker 1: was twenty twenty. But there was the democratic like logo.
Speaker 1: It looked like he was a direct attack, like on
Speaker 1: the America, like the continent of America, like with the way,
Speaker 1: with the way the arrow was pointed at it. It was
Speaker 1: very occulted symbolism.
Speaker 4: That's interesting. I've never seen that pass that along when
Speaker 4: you can.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's it's deep down. I got I'll find it.
Speaker 4: So I thank Mark Harges Patrick Nash for that DARPA
Speaker 4: brandize that was very eye opening. Thank you very much.
Speaker 4: Nice because what why that is important? It's showing and
Speaker 4: it's it's vindicating our research showing that, you know, Brandeis
Speaker 4: is very influential today even though you know he died
Speaker 4: eighty years ago, but he sets precedent that still exists today.
Speaker 1: Created the problems, he orchestrated address he was he was
Speaker 1: He was a shock collar for every major catastrophe that
Speaker 1: befell our freedoms.
Speaker 4: Yeah, all the famous investigations going into the trusts, into
Speaker 4: Wall Street, into industrial combinations, all of these things, he
Speaker 4: was there involved. And we see today that Standard Oil
Speaker 4: is more prominent in North America especially than they were then.
Speaker 4: It's just that they've changed their names. You know, Standard
Speaker 4: Oil owns BP, they own Exxon, they've owned Chevron. So
Speaker 4: it's an illusion of choice that we have an illusion
Speaker 4: of competition, which is something else that Brandi's created.
Speaker 1: Right, that's great.
Speaker 4: You know, the deeper we go into this guy, the
Speaker 4: more influential he becomes. And he's a Frankest sabot In.
Speaker 1: And what we also need to take a look at too,
Speaker 1: is this this thing is not just oh it happened,
Speaker 1: no modern day, right, now they're still implementing this. And
Speaker 1: when you look at what Kamala is proposing and what
Speaker 1: you're seeing as the consolidation of ownership of property under
Speaker 1: the Black Rock Vanguard, you know those guys, they're gonna
Speaker 1: be pricing you out of your home. You can have
Speaker 1: to end up having to sell for this, you know
Speaker 1: what they call it the capital gains tax or whatever.
Speaker 1: I mean. There's so many things that are at work
Speaker 1: right now to annihilate everything that you worked for your
Speaker 1: entire life, or your family has worked for. And it's
Speaker 1: all going to go into one consolidated network of people.
Speaker 1: And you know who they are, the.
Speaker 4: Same people as before and Blackrock Vanguard. Those are all
Speaker 4: the modern day furthest imaginations, the furthest imaginings of these
Speaker 4: people you know that started this movement over one hundred
Speaker 4: years ago. This is what we are seeing as a result.
Speaker 4: So hindsight here super important, super powerful, because we can
Speaker 4: be a witness both to their conclusions that they made
Speaker 4: one hundred years ago and make final judgment on how
Speaker 4: they've worked out one hundred years later. So we are
Speaker 4: in a key period of time that if you know,
Speaker 4: this gets through us and onto the next generations. I'm
Speaker 4: not sure people are going to have the background and
Speaker 4: knowledge of history to be able to identify like we are.
Speaker 1: Yeah, now that the things are disappearing every day and
Speaker 1: access to it. And you know, I saw an article
Speaker 1: today talking about and I know it was contrived, but
Speaker 1: they're trying to push this idea that the younger generation
Speaker 1: has no sentimentality or connection with what happened today twenty
Speaker 1: three years ago, and that you know, the one of
Speaker 1: the articles was put up by Rolling Stone and it
Speaker 1: was such a fake article, but they're trying to sell
Speaker 1: the idea that it's not cool and you're going to
Speaker 1: be ridiculed in at if you bring it up as
Speaker 1: you know, some major event, and it's it's really discussing
Speaker 1: how it's written. You know, I think Rolling Stone should
Speaker 1: be put out of business by boycott because of it.
Speaker 1: But what they're what they're basically saying is that it's
Speaker 1: it's now a meme and it's a joke. The three
Speaker 1: thousand people who were murdered by Israel and in the
Speaker 1: United States itself, it's it's disgusting.
Speaker 4: This is that slow creep because this is this war
Speaker 4: is generational. They understand it. They understood it a long
Speaker 4: time ago that the only way that they're really going
Speaker 4: to be able to make changes this way was slow
Speaker 4: a Fabian. This is their Fabian game plan. Same with
Speaker 4: the progressives, right, Like like boiling a frog, you can't
Speaker 4: just drop it into a boiling water, it'll jump out.
Speaker 4: You have to slowly raise the temperature. That is exactly
Speaker 4: what's happening here. And we're a very important generation, Daniel,
Speaker 4: and your work is very important, you know, So you know,
Speaker 4: it reminds me to remind everybody you know that Daniel
Speaker 4: needs a new computer. Yeah right, And so we shouldn't
Speaker 4: have to be slaves to technology like this. I think
Speaker 4: Daniel's doing some great, honorable work and trying to expose
Speaker 4: this movement and to show how harmful it's been to
Speaker 4: the West. And so I encourage everybody, whatever you can do,
Speaker 4: even if it's five bucks, throw it his way. Let's
Speaker 4: get a computer that's up and running that doesn't complicate things,
Speaker 4: because this is really the last thing that we need
Speaker 4: when we're investigating like this is to be held up
Speaker 4: by things that are out of our control.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, just as just as mentioned too. If you
Speaker 1: guys reading the live chat and you see this little
Speaker 1: green dot in the bottom left hand corner you if
Speaker 1: you click that, it's the same thing as a super
Speaker 1: chat and within like I think it's like the following month,
Speaker 1: Runble will give it to me less. They're very much
Speaker 1: smaller take than like say YouTube would take. But it's yeah,
Speaker 1: that also helps. So if you don't want to do
Speaker 1: the gifts and go route, there's always that there. You
Speaker 1: can do it rate of chat in the super chat
Speaker 1: so it always get red, you know.
Speaker 4: And I'm a big fan of purchasing your hot sauce.
Speaker 4: I would say that really helps Daniel because he's not
Speaker 4: giving you vitamin supplements that he didn't make. You know,
Speaker 4: this is a lot of these podcasters do that. This
Speaker 4: is something that Daniel makes himself. And as a farmer
Speaker 4: and a grower of hot peppers and all of that,
Speaker 4: we have affiliation there, right, We have some common ground
Speaker 4: and I appreciate that very much that there's a podcast
Speaker 4: podcaster out there that funds himself through the things that
Speaker 4: he creates. This is what we try to do here
Speaker 4: at bulletproofpub dot com too. We try to finance ourselves
Speaker 4: through the farm so that we can keep this going
Speaker 4: and so again, I just encourage everybody to throw five
Speaker 4: bucks Daniel's way, support his hot sauces bya his book.
Speaker 1: I'm still I'm still scrolling to try to find the
Speaker 1: the post. It's I think it was like the very
Speaker 1: beginning of my Instagram. Something scrolled down to find it.
Speaker 1: But it was like to me, it was very it
Speaker 1: was very obvious, right, I mean I'd done a search
Speaker 1: on it and would have found it faster. But I'll
Speaker 1: just see if I can find it. But yeah, I
Speaker 1: can still, I can multitask me.
Speaker 4: And you said rolling Stone.
Speaker 1: Yeah it, let me read a little bit of it.
Speaker 1: I can do that.
Speaker 4: Well, I just wanted to say before you do that.
Speaker 4: Rolling Stone was created, you know, for the purpose of propaganda.
Speaker 4: When you look at the founders of Rolling Stone, one
Speaker 4: of the founders is considered Hunter S. Thompson. Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Well, uh, it's really created as a propaganda magazine to
Speaker 4: promote rock and roll music, which is whether you like
Speaker 4: it or not, uh, military moral to be degenerousy. When
Speaker 4: you look at bands like Martley Crue and who's famous nowadays,
Speaker 4: look at what they promote. We've got to change our values,
Speaker 4: get pay attention to the things that matter. And I
Speaker 4: was in a band in the nineties. These are some
Speaker 4: of my uh, these are I don't want to say heroes,
Speaker 4: but these are people that I looked up to. And uh,
Speaker 4: you know, I could sing a lot of those songs
Speaker 4: and not miss a lyric. But was it into my
Speaker 4: fiftieth year here I realize what it is, and so
Speaker 4: we must step out of this, uh, this juvenile sort
Speaker 4: of look at our life that everything's supposed to be
Speaker 4: entertaining us when that's not the case at all. It's
Speaker 4: entraining you into accepting antinomial, degenerative ideas that aren't productive
Speaker 4: Jewish or anybody.
Speaker 1: Yeah, as a Jewish anti culture.
Speaker 4: Sure, that's exactly what it is.
Speaker 1: And it's so the Rollingstone dot com. It is actually
Speaker 1: under their their tab for culture, which is even what disgusting,
Speaker 1: and it says how nine to eleven became one of
Speaker 1: the internet's most popular memes and when you when you
Speaker 1: when you read it, it's about this fake twenty one
Speaker 1: year old girl who may or may not exist, but
Speaker 1: they isolate her and make her out to be like this, uh,
Speaker 1: this voice of all the youth and they say one person, right,
Speaker 1: and she makes this post and they don't. I don't
Speaker 1: know where. They said, I'll read it again. But and
Speaker 1: apparently it had twenty thousand or ten thousand quote unquote
Speaker 1: favorites and it was mocking or something like that of
Speaker 1: and she said, I know I should feel something about this,
Speaker 1: but I just don't. I have no connection to it.
Speaker 1: And she and so you get you get her first name,
Speaker 1: no user name, no last name. She she wishes to
Speaker 1: remain anonymous. And then she took the post down. So
Speaker 1: there's no tracing any of this as being valid at all.
Speaker 1: And then they're saying that this is this is the uh,
Speaker 1: this is the voice of the youth right now. And
Speaker 1: then I said, well, that's a reflection of the parent.
Speaker 1: And if that's at all true.
Speaker 4: And it's anecdotal, right, you must know that this is
Speaker 4: the story of one person that you can't source. So
Speaker 4: you actually can't walk away from that article believing a thing, right,
Speaker 4: But many do. And this is this is the education
Speaker 4: that was removed from our schooling. If we would, if
Speaker 4: we had been taught how to to properly discern, be
Speaker 4: logical chain reasoning together, none of this would be happening.
Speaker 4: I heard this morning leftists talking about they are eating pets.
Speaker 1: Yes, I don't know what that is.
Speaker 4: But is this does this mean that they think the
Speaker 4: Conservatives and Republicans are eating.
Speaker 1: No, it's the Hitchens that they let in twenty thousand
Speaker 1: of them into into Springfield, Ohio. That was a specific
Speaker 1: to that place. But if that, you know, with Sion
Speaker 1: other ones that they let in, you know, that's the
Speaker 1: culture that are the lack thereof lack of culture, the
Speaker 1: anti culture that is being pumped into this country because
Speaker 1: they're the replacements.
Speaker 4: Okay, so they're there. So the story is that there
Speaker 4: are people that are from the multi culturalists uh uh
Speaker 4: immigration movement they eat pets for food. So then there's
Speaker 4: what's going on in America. Yeah, yeah, right, okay.
Speaker 1: All right, yeah. And they're saying that it's it's it's
Speaker 1: racist to uh to make these claims. There's a picture
Speaker 1: of a Haitian guy walking around with a dead goose
Speaker 1: that he killed in the park.
Speaker 4: Just walked up to him. Right, So here's the the
Speaker 4: contradictions in our societies, right, this is the problem right here.
Speaker 1: And I posted a video of another presumably Haitian person
Speaker 1: twisting back and forth the neck of a cat and
Speaker 1: that was a video and it's I don't know where
Speaker 1: it could have been in Haiti itself. But if that's
Speaker 1: what's there, then that's what's here now and that's the
Speaker 1: point really, right, Yeah, this is oh here, it is cool.
Speaker 1: I found it, all right, let me show you all right,
Speaker 1: So I'm not reading into this. I don't think. I
Speaker 1: don't think.
Speaker 3: So.
Speaker 1: Am I the only one who sees death to America
Speaker 1: in the DNC logo? See the arrow? Yeah, and it's
Speaker 1: death to America? Right, the star and then you have the.
Speaker 4: Yep, right, I don't think you're that and the star?
Speaker 4: Why the star?
Speaker 3: Right? Right?
Speaker 1: It's all very very cryptic. I was in September twenty second,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, I posted.
Speaker 4: That that's very interesting and that's legit. That's then an
Speaker 4: arrow is indicator of movement. Right. This is a progressive logo,
Speaker 4: just like Hillary Clinton's h It had a red arrow
Speaker 4: going left to right. Same thing. So you can tell
Speaker 4: just by the slogans who you're cheering for, who you're
Speaker 4: voting for. It's like here in Canada they're called the
Speaker 4: New Democrat Party. They've been around for quite a while.
Speaker 4: I didn't realize what they were until just a few
Speaker 4: years ago. Now that that is another progressive party in Canada.
Speaker 1: Right, it's tilted too by the stars tilted, yeah, angled
Speaker 1: at it. And you know they used that same star
Speaker 1: as a pentagram, right, so it could be like this
Speaker 1: person thrashers. So it's the star is that is the
Speaker 1: a nose, it has eyes and horns, right, And.
Speaker 4: I wonder if that slight offset is the same degrees
Speaker 4: as as the swastika was shifted. You see a lot
Speaker 4: of that in their logos, sort of circular. I've shown
Speaker 4: that in some of my videos. The Historical Association of America,
Speaker 4: I think has you know, you see it in the logos.
Speaker 4: They're they're almost a swastika. There's four sort of motions going.
Speaker 1: Well, the reason for that is because of the that's
Speaker 1: not indicative of anything to do with the swastika. It's
Speaker 1: if it if it can form with its angles of square.
Speaker 1: They tilted on its point because a cube is a hexagram, right,
Speaker 1: so it's duplicating the same pattern. And also they're a
Speaker 1: bunch of Saturn cult worshippers right right. And and funny enough,
Speaker 1: what would the borg in Star Trek next generation riding
Speaker 1: around in but a freaking cube and they were transhumanists.
Speaker 4: Right right, everything's told you through our pop culture. Yeah.
Speaker 4: So one other thing I want to cover here is
Speaker 4: sort of going back to our talk previously on scientific
Speaker 4: management Taylorism. I just want to show everybody that they're
Speaker 4: significant source material out there indicating that the principles of
Speaker 4: scientific management was translated sent over to Russia China. Mao
Speaker 4: uh is a Yale graduate.
Speaker 1: Yep, Yale in China.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Yale at peak Peeking University. Check it out. So
Speaker 4: I would suggest that Mao is Phi beta kappa, probably
Speaker 4: skull and bones, even when you when you look at
Speaker 4: what he's achieved, right these uh, this eugenics progressive milieu
Speaker 4: would look on with pride as to what Mao accomplished.
Speaker 4: And Rockefeller even says this in his memoirs.
Speaker 1: And and doing going back to that, Uh, I'm sorry
Speaker 1: with with Mao. They are not gonna put them They're
Speaker 1: not gonna put a non ethnic well you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, Like, they're not gonna they're not gonna mismatch
Speaker 1: the ethnicity of a country except in Mexico. Apparently with
Speaker 1: with with you know, it's something representative of who actually
Speaker 1: controls it. They're gonna use another Chinaman so that the
Speaker 1: appearance of an apt country not controlled by something else,
Speaker 1: you know, And ever since, and it's been jesuit juice
Speaker 1: run run by proxy, and we act like, oh, it's China. No,
Speaker 1: it's not China, it's the rule.
Speaker 7: No.
Speaker 4: No, it's like nineteen eighty four. You've got to think
Speaker 4: about nineteen eighty four. This is how they are playing us.
Speaker 4: Putin isn't against us, he's he's with these major powers
Speaker 4: and they're just playing each other off to create fear
Speaker 4: in all of their respective populations. There's just no doubt
Speaker 4: about it now, especially when you start looking at this
Speaker 4: kind of evidence from the Ohio Yeah University with Bolshevism.
Speaker 1: Do I see him as the anti bolshevikso Putin, Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: and I have. I've done a lot of yeah, and
Speaker 1: you know, it's sure at the end of that it is.
Speaker 1: But I think it's pretty funny that he offered sanctuary
Speaker 1: to Americans right in Russia.
Speaker 4: Well, I would say that the Bolsheviks were largely a caustic,
Speaker 4: dysfunctional movement trying to overthrow the Soviet Union, just like
Speaker 4: they're doing here and just like they did in Germany
Speaker 4: and China. Yep, it's this internationalism, not not a bunch
Speaker 4: of commis. This is where they find common ground is
Speaker 4: in internationalism. And this is why they use a corporation
Speaker 4: because the corporation does the same thing.
Speaker 1: Yep. And that's a connection to between MAO and all
Speaker 1: that you were just talking about that what is his name,
Speaker 1: Anthony Antony, Anthony Anthony, Yeah, yeah, he did when he
Speaker 1: did his work on this talking about the what do
Speaker 1: they call it? Did he say a capitalist communists because
Speaker 1: they're supposed to be like ye of each other, that
Speaker 1: they were all run by the mega capitalists and that's yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 4: So you can see now that we're actually well beyond
Speaker 4: the research that these guys that we look up to,
Speaker 4: including William Cooper, right, we were beyond their research and
Speaker 4: really getting into the particulars and showing that everything that
Speaker 4: they had said is accurate. So, you know, Initially, while
Speaker 4: working on his plans for the Bolshevik rebel, Vladimir Lenin
Speaker 4: analyzed Taylor's principles of scientific management responded harshly, arguing that
Speaker 4: the system essentially works to enslave Man and referring to
Speaker 4: the plan as the scientific system of sweating he's totally accurate.
Speaker 4: In his first public sort of summary of what he
Speaker 4: thought the principles of scientific management was, he says it's
Speaker 4: essentially to enslave man, and he's exactly accurate. But it's
Speaker 4: later on that he decides that this is actually going
Speaker 4: to work for us. So, in response to the destroyed
Speaker 4: economy of the post revolutionary Soviet Russia, however, Lenin changed
Speaker 4: his view on Taylorism, stating in nineteen eighteen articles, So
Speaker 4: this is five years now after the publication of.
Speaker 1: It's not that he changed, it's that he told the
Speaker 1: people and that he's exactly Yeah, he's two faced, exactly.
Speaker 4: And so I've brought this this source up myself the
Speaker 4: immediate tasks of the Soviet government from Pravda, and he
Speaker 4: states that the tailor system, properly controlled and intelligently applied
Speaker 4: by the working people themselves, will serve as a reliable
Speaker 4: means of further reducing the obligatory working day for the
Speaker 4: entire working population, will serve as an effective means of
Speaker 4: dealing in a fairly short space of time with a
Speaker 4: task that could roughly be expressed as follows six hours
Speaker 4: of physical work daily for every adult citizen and four
Speaker 4: hours work in running the state. So he's calling for
Speaker 4: a ten hour day right there, which six you're going
Speaker 4: to work for yourself or the state? Really right, we're
Speaker 4: in socialism, and then another four hours running Russia. Okay,
Speaker 4: So I would say that no matter where you go,
Speaker 4: you're going to see that this is just another non
Speaker 4: conspiracy theory. It's just documented historical fact. So you know,
Speaker 4: I've got more tags here? Does that just switch over
Speaker 4: for you?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 4: Yeah, So I got to stop sharing and then go
Speaker 4: hit that tab again because I just want to show
Speaker 4: the similarities between how they infiltrated the West and how
Speaker 4: they infiltrated Russia. It's the same method, it's just different languages,
Speaker 4: different culture.
Speaker 1: And that all originated from here with shift funding using
Speaker 1: our money of course, because they had already wrestled the
Speaker 1: gold out of America when they set up their Federal
Speaker 1: Reserve Act, so technically all of our assets were theirs
Speaker 1: and funded the Bullsher's Revolution, trained them in New York
Speaker 1: in the Jewish ghettos, and off they went. They had
Speaker 1: sanctuary here for Trotsky for a little while too. Yes,
Speaker 1: And that's what I was going to get under Switzerland
Speaker 1: I think, and then he went back to after their
Speaker 1: first defeat of their attempt of Acciust.
Speaker 4: So Trotsky actually is in the New York Public Library
Speaker 4: until early spring of nineteen seventeen, and then Walter Littman,
Speaker 4: less than four months later, starts the inquiry. This is
Speaker 4: the origins of the Council on Foreign Relations the Royal
Speaker 4: Institute of International Affairs, the two sister organizations of the internationalism,
Speaker 4: the two most powerful even today. Probably so Walter Littman
Speaker 4: and Trotsky are less than four months separated from their
Speaker 4: work at the New York Public Library. Now, this is
Speaker 4: a very intriguing four months in history when you start
Speaker 4: to see what happens after. So I haven't been able
Speaker 4: to make any connections there, but it's dubious.
Speaker 1: Chimneys is the spread of Soviet Russia.
Speaker 4: Right and so just like me, yes, just like we
Speaker 4: look at the factory system and we're pushing Americans into
Speaker 4: the factory system as the answer to our ever more
Speaker 4: complex society, they're doing the same thing in Russia. Smoke
Speaker 4: of Chimneys is the breath of Soviet Russia.
Speaker 1: You know what that means? Get off your farm land. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's self sufficient. Same thing get into the cities, and I.
Speaker 4: Would say that you know that revolution is really largely
Speaker 4: like the violence and everything that that happened was because
Speaker 4: these people that had their own homesteads or their own
Speaker 4: lives and they were they were comfortable, were being forced
Speaker 4: into factories. And it would be my assumption that the
Speaker 4: Russians were just a little more aggressive even though the
Speaker 4: Americans drew arms against people like Carnegie and Rockefeller. You know,
Speaker 4: workers died, their wives were burned to death, their children,
Speaker 4: Look at the Ludlow massacre. You know, a lot of
Speaker 4: this is suppressed in America but amplified when we talk
Speaker 4: about Russia. Look at how backwards the Russians are. But
Speaker 4: look it out together we are okay.
Speaker 1: The problem that we have always had with our approach
Speaker 1: is that we don't we fight the person in front
Speaker 1: of us who is resisting or or tyrannically suppressing, instead
Speaker 1: of going to the source of the problem. If anybody
Speaker 1: knoed on Carnegie's door, it would have been over.
Speaker 4: Yes, And this is why we do our work. We
Speaker 4: chase it to source. We want to know who is
Speaker 4: the real, uh, the one really responsible for all of this.
Speaker 4: So here again lenin writing Peace wages should be fixed
Speaker 4: for all industries without exception out of productivity and maintain discipline.
Speaker 4: It is necessary to set up industrial courts, to form
Speaker 4: groups of controllers of various trades, not at the enterprise
Speaker 4: but from outside and enlisting the cooperation of engineers, bookkeepers
Speaker 4: and peasants. Furthermore, it is necessary to organize output in
Speaker 4: the transition to socialism may enable us to reduce the
Speaker 4: working day. So when you look at William Dodd, I
Speaker 4: think is his name. He was an investigator with Renee
Speaker 4: wormser into the foundations and this is you know what
Speaker 4: he is famous for is that when he investigated, even
Speaker 4: though they found nobody guilty because they were railroaded, they
Speaker 4: said there is a definite agenda to bring America and
Speaker 4: the Soviet Union together, same thing that Antony Sutton has
Speaker 4: uncovered in one hundred other investigative researchers, including ourselves.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and that a perastriker thinks part of that too,
Speaker 1: with job writing that book right Cold War.
Speaker 4: You know that that term was coined by either Bernard
Speaker 4: Baruch or Walter Littman, both Phi Beta Kappa lawyers, fabians, progressives,
Speaker 4: a nonconformist, secular Jews.
Speaker 1: There you go, okay.
Speaker 4: And industri Sorry. The Great Society, written by Fabian founder
Speaker 4: Graham Wallace, was dedicated to Litman. You can find that
Speaker 4: on archives dot org. Right now, just put in the
Speaker 4: Great Society Graham Wallace Archives go to like the third
Speaker 4: page in it says, this book is dedicated to Walter Lippman.
Speaker 4: Litman a key hub, a key guy between the American
Speaker 4: progressives and the Fabians, because he's both, and he's an
Speaker 4: Anglo American. He's a member of the Cecil Rhodes Roundtable.
Speaker 1: What is that supposed to be a Mongolian?
Speaker 4: I mean, is Siberian?
Speaker 1: Maybe?
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 4: But it's on the Guleag Archipelago. I can guarantee you
Speaker 4: this is how they built the USSR. Right, we talk
Speaker 4: about the Gulag archapella Ago. Alexander Schultzen needs some three
Speaker 4: volume work. It's a ton of reading.
Speaker 1: There's a there's another one that I guess just now
Speaker 1: finally have put into English. And it wasn't done officially.
Speaker 1: It was done by an independent. It was it was
Speaker 1: a book that he wrote that you weren't supposed to read.
Speaker 1: So I got to track that one down because that
Speaker 1: was even more condemning apparently.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and so let me just share this again here
Speaker 4: a minute, because he writes on the tailor system Lenin does. So,
Speaker 4: you know, this was very surprising to me, you know,
Speaker 4: because we grow up in a in a bubble, in
Speaker 4: a Western echo chamber. You know, I mean, even today,
Speaker 4: how many of the cities in Africa do we see
Speaker 4: or are we familiar with, or in Europe? But if
Speaker 4: you put in some of these cities and have a
Speaker 4: look at the pictures come up, you'd be just shocked
Speaker 4: on how developed these countries are that they tell us
Speaker 4: they're underdeveloped.
Speaker 1: You know, it's funny too about you know, going back
Speaker 1: to that whole bring everybody into the city, the industry
Speaker 1: revolution in America. Right, there's a book called Dissolving Illusions,
Speaker 1: and they don't quite get the whole virus is a
Speaker 1: fraud thing. But what they do is they talk about
Speaker 1: the level of filth and poverty that these people left
Speaker 1: to get stuck in when they started becoming these workers,
Speaker 1: and that you know, obviously, the lack of sanitation, it
Speaker 1: was just ridlating people with all kinds of different diseases,
Speaker 1: lack of nutrition, they were basically starving children left alone
Speaker 1: for the day because the parents were all that stuff,
Speaker 1: you know, or working themselves. That's another aspect of it.
Speaker 1: That children were eight nine years old working crazy hours,
Speaker 1: ten hours a day, like you were saying, and dying
Speaker 1: in the process. A lot able to canaries and the
Speaker 1: coal mines too. The children were very, very disposable. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's just it's it was a it was a it
Speaker 1: was a perfect formula for just outbreaks of all kinds
Speaker 1: of different diseases. And then they in rushed the vaccines
Speaker 1: and you know, killed off more people. Luckily look at them,
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 4: Yeah. And you mentioned Schiff earlier as being a funder
Speaker 4: to the Bolshevik revolution. That's absolutely true. The one thing
Speaker 4: I do want to bring to everybody's attention is that
Speaker 4: Brandeis was directing Shift and Warburg as part of the
Speaker 4: joint distribution.
Speaker 1: That's interesting, right, This is.
Speaker 4: The funding of the creation of Israel. Brandeis is the
Speaker 4: founder of the Palestine Economic Corporation, and take him in
Speaker 4: directing Shift and Warburg.
Speaker 1: Yeah, take them in and think about that because the Shifts,
Speaker 1: they they shared a home in Frankfurt on the Main
Speaker 1: with the ross Childs. So if anybody was close to
Speaker 1: the Rothschilds. With Ben the Shifts, you would think that
Speaker 1: he would have outranked him as an eight agent of
Speaker 1: the Rothschilds. Yet he was taking orders from There's something
Speaker 1: very very deeply rooted between the brand Eyes or him
Speaker 1: and the Rothschilds.
Speaker 4: Yep. And when you look at the Wiles and the Demitzes,
Speaker 4: especially the Wiles at this point, w E H l E.
Speaker 4: This is uh. You know, Adolph Lewis's father is handpicked
Speaker 4: by this three family group. The Brandizes, the Dembitzes and
Speaker 4: the Whales to be a recon mission to go and
Speaker 4: look in America, to see where we can fit in
Speaker 4: and to establish this movement. And that's directly from the Rothschilds.
Speaker 4: It's admitted by his biographers that they came to America
Speaker 4: with a rothschild agent looking after his investments. Oh and
Speaker 4: the Brandises and the Whales come from the ristocracy, right.
Speaker 4: These are rich, rich families, especially the Whales. They are
Speaker 4: one of the richest families in Prague.
Speaker 1: And you know it's messed up about that too, is
Speaker 1: you have the row Well. I mean, even in the
Speaker 1: eighteen thirties you have people like Samuel Morse, the telegraph
Speaker 1: guy in Morrise Code warning people about the Jesuit infusion
Speaker 1: into America and how they were also you know, subversive,
Speaker 1: trying to change the you know, change the mentality the
Speaker 1: psyche of America. And it's you know, when you talk
Speaker 1: about the Jesuits, you're talking about the same Roman group
Speaker 1: you're talking about. You're talking about the Rothchilds too. And
Speaker 1: people don't get that. But they they have awards. They
Speaker 1: have the Cross of Saint Sylvester I believe or its
Speaker 1: a Maltese cross. That's something an alcohla that you get,
Speaker 1: just like you would have in the past Laurel leaves,
Speaker 1: showing that you did something noble and did Rome proud. Right,
Speaker 1: So you don't get those unless you're doing some kind
Speaker 1: of service for the Holy See.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and I would say that the Jesuits are there
Speaker 4: in Paris nineteen nineteen two. This is the Peace Conference
Speaker 4: is largely created out of a dialectic that the Vatican
Speaker 4: and the Pope at the time created themselves with their
Speaker 4: letters to all belligerents in this war, because they created
Speaker 4: the Great War to make everybody shocked at the atrocities
Speaker 4: that are created through the material force of arms. The
Speaker 4: idea of killing each other with bombs and guns because
Speaker 4: they wanted everybody to be sick of it so that
Speaker 4: they would accept this new international form of law. So,
Speaker 4: you know, the Jesuits actually create the dialectic that bring
Speaker 4: the belligerent parties together in Paris nineteen nineteen. And also
Speaker 4: Herzel talks many years prior, like nearly thirty years prior
Speaker 4: to the peace conference, saying that we need to establish
Speaker 4: a peace conference, a conference in which we can finally
Speaker 4: lay out the peace program that we have. And so
Speaker 4: this is what we see. You know.
Speaker 1: It's funny too, is that Bill Cooper used to bring
Speaker 1: up often that the definition of peace from Marx and
Speaker 1: from Lenin, who basically said the same thing is peace
Speaker 1: is the absence of resistance to socialism, right, and the
Speaker 1: socialism is the stepping Democracy is a stepping stone to
Speaker 1: socialism is a step go into communism, which is the
Speaker 1: ultimate goal.
Speaker 4: Yep, that's perfect timing here because in this letter he
Speaker 4: talks about it. He says capitalism cannot be at a
Speaker 4: standstill for a single moment. It must forever be moving forward. Competition,
Speaker 4: which is established by Brandeyes. The whole idea of competition
Speaker 4: regulated competition. That whole term is by him, which is
Speaker 4: keenest in a period of crisis like the present, calls
Speaker 4: for the invention of an increasing number of new devices
Speaker 4: to reduce the cost of production. But the domination of
Speaker 4: capital converts all these devices into instruments for the further
Speaker 4: exploitation of the workers. The tailor system, which William Jennings
Speaker 4: on ABC News said that is one of the most
Speaker 4: influential isms of the twentieth century, is one of those devices.
Speaker 4: So when you want to talk about our enslavement or
Speaker 4: all of us being members of the wage enslavement class,
Speaker 4: this is where it happened.
Speaker 1: So because think about it, any great civilization that, even
Speaker 1: though history is so screwed up, I mean, do you
Speaker 1: honestly think that within the same civilization they were competing
Speaker 1: in cutthroats against each other, How would they have ever
Speaker 1: gotten anywhere if they didn't exactly, if the kingdom itself didn't,
Speaker 1: you know, made things priced out of your range, then
Speaker 1: they would also be hind during their their own development
Speaker 1: and strength as a you know, in commerce and at war.
Speaker 1: It's like no, that's you know, I mean, it's like
Speaker 1: you would work together as a community and That's the
Speaker 1: other thing too, is the whole idea of disarmament of
Speaker 1: the people of a country is only if you're the target,
Speaker 1: because every other aspect and every other you know, going back,
Speaker 1: I guess you have to go back a little far
Speaker 1: for this, But in history they always wanted to have
Speaker 1: their people trained for war. You had to, you know,
Speaker 1: spend a certain amount of time each day or a
Speaker 1: week or whatever, learning the bow, learning the sword, so
Speaker 1: that when something happened, when invaders, which were a common
Speaker 1: thing occurred, you were strong enough to defend the country.
Speaker 1: And so if if in the absence, in the absence
Speaker 1: of that, what are they actually trying to do, we
Speaker 1: can use so that they can do it themselves.
Speaker 4: Yeah, And preparedness means preparedness is what you're talking about there,
Speaker 4: And that's a major pillar to progressivism, the need for
Speaker 4: a large military. Look at us today, look at their
Speaker 4: defense spending.
Speaker 1: The defense unarmed, right, that's the that's the other goal
Speaker 1: is like, no, the military which we control and we
Speaker 1: control their minds and we direct them. We don't want
Speaker 1: the people to be able to resist that by you know,
Speaker 1: or or defend themselves against any type of attack.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Actually, one other anecdotal piece of information that I
Speaker 4: discovered this week is that the NHL starts at season
Speaker 4: this year in Prague, which is the center for Frankism.
Speaker 4: One of the teams that is going to be there.
Speaker 4: Can anybody guess the New Jersey.
Speaker 1: Devils, Ah, funny brotherless Devils.
Speaker 4: I don't know if that's by Quinky Dank or not,
Speaker 4: but it's very interesting.
Speaker 1: I'm a Red Wings fan. He was a well I
Speaker 1: don't have I haven't paid attention to sports and decade,
Speaker 1: but he was. He played hockey when he was younger. Yeah, really, well,
Speaker 1: so he was. He end up being a deult. Their
Speaker 1: farm team is right in Albany, so we had season
Speaker 1: tickets right sure.
Speaker 4: Being a Canadian, I've played hockey all my life, loved it.
Speaker 4: It is the one thing that I allow myself to
Speaker 4: do to sort of rust my mind, take a break
Speaker 4: from things, is to watch my team, the Vancouver Canucks.
Speaker 1: Nice. They put up a good fights.
Speaker 4: Yeah they're coming around. They looked good last year. But
Speaker 4: it is one of those you know, we work hard here,
Speaker 4: whether we're doing research or farming, and so we get
Speaker 4: home and we like to rejuvenate, and that is one
Speaker 4: way that we just turn our brain right off. So
Speaker 4: I feel like I'm using that responsibly. You know, I'm
Speaker 4: not one of these guys that has eight different jerseys
Speaker 4: and I'm watching all different sports. That was me about
Speaker 4: twenty years ago, no shit, But now we must be
Speaker 4: paying attention to better things. We know that NFL was
Speaker 4: created by skull and bones Walter Camp, so we got
Speaker 4: to stay away from the NFL. We can't be funding
Speaker 4: these things that are toxic to our our values and
Speaker 4: traditions here, like.
Speaker 1: Fake boxing with Jake Paul. You mean I can't enjoy
Speaker 1: fake boxing with Jake Paul.
Speaker 4: I would say, if you're doing your homework and somebody
Speaker 4: like you, Daniel, that does his homework that is pushing
Speaker 4: in the same direction as.
Speaker 1: We are, he is aware of it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's it's you're not using it as a distraction
Speaker 4: in the way that everybody else is. So you know,
Speaker 4: I have no problem with people that get involved in
Speaker 4: some of these distractions, just as long as it is
Speaker 4: on your terms, not it. It's don't be falling for
Speaker 4: musty match ups between the big teams and all of
Speaker 4: this bullshit. There was this musty TV, right, this is
Speaker 4: must e TV. What we're doing right now, because this
Speaker 4: is going to empower you to see through all of
Speaker 4: the lies.
Speaker 1: That's why I pick out articles and I will read
Speaker 1: them and pick them apart so that it's like it's
Speaker 1: training the exercise. I've seen where the lie is and
Speaker 1: how do you interpret between the lines. And I'm not
Speaker 1: saying I'm perfect at it, but if I catch some
Speaker 1: stuff and it's it's deliberately trying to deceive somebody, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna I like to point that out so people see
Speaker 1: like the method behind how to do that.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 4: One of the great ways to do that is whenever
Speaker 4: you see a headline that says experts say, and you
Speaker 4: can do this with any headline, really, but go into
Speaker 4: the body of the article, and I guarantee you nine
Speaker 4: times ninety nine times out of one hundred, there's no source.
Speaker 4: They'll say experts say, and they'll tell you who it is,
Speaker 4: but there's no link to a study or to the
Speaker 4: source material that is that substantiates their claim. This is
Speaker 4: one of the things. Ten years ago, I started looking
Speaker 4: into all these headlines that said experts say, and do
Speaker 4: you have a link that you can follow to a
Speaker 4: source that you can actually trust?
Speaker 1: You know, someone said to me when I posted a
Speaker 1: comment about a video, say, you know, saying that that
Speaker 1: was talking about Waddell's Waddell's book Makers of Civilization, and
Speaker 1: how you know where the deceptions were and who those people,
Speaker 1: what their true identity was and there and this. The
Speaker 1: person replied back, no one, No one pays attention to
Speaker 1: Woodell's where no one takes it seriously. I'm like, so
Speaker 1: that's an appeal to authority. So it's history by consensus
Speaker 1: because you have a bunch of a seriologists and Egyptologists
Speaker 1: who want to make everything semitic. So therefore you don't
Speaker 1: even look at Woodell's work because if you did, you couldn't.
Speaker 1: You couldn't say the guy didn't do like, at like
Speaker 1: genius level homework and learn all these ancient languages just
Speaker 1: so that he could see whether or not the other
Speaker 1: people were accurate. And then you find out that they
Speaker 1: were deliberately deceiving you.
Speaker 4: And that's that's literally judging a book by its cover.
Speaker 1: Right, Oh the name stay away, don't even look at it,
Speaker 1: do not want to do?
Speaker 4: Yeah. A sign of intelligence is to consider without necessarily
Speaker 4: applying it to our life or accepting it as truth.
Speaker 4: This is one of the talents or the skills of discernment.
Speaker 4: This is what they took out of our schooling. So
Speaker 4: I'm in the middle of a conversation with a school
Speaker 4: teacher of forty five years that is finding it impossible
Speaker 4: that our western K through twelve education system was borrowed
Speaker 4: from Prussian Reformation. He will not believe it. He thinks
Speaker 4: I am crazy. But the truth remains and it is.
Speaker 4: It isn't affected by my personal opinion or his.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the facts don't change it because of your opinion.
Speaker 1: That is different.
Speaker 4: Yeah, So just one last thing on this Lenin letter.
Speaker 4: I just want to read a couple of these short
Speaker 4: little paragraphs. So the layout of new Fact buildings is
Speaker 4: planned in such a way that not a moment will
Speaker 4: be lost in delivering materials to the factory and conveying
Speaker 4: them from one shop to another, and in dispatching the
Speaker 4: finished products. The cinema is systematically employed for studying the
Speaker 4: work of the best operatives and increasing its intensity, speeding
Speaker 4: up the workers. So when we look at the modern
Speaker 4: day assembly line, what is it? But the people are
Speaker 4: actually on the assembly line too, which means that if
Speaker 4: there was such a thing, a hypothetical knob in which
Speaker 4: the capitalist manufacturer could go over and crank up like
Speaker 4: a heat dial. They would speed up the efficiency of
Speaker 4: the workers. And this is really what they've done with
Speaker 4: the assembly line, especially when you look at today through
Speaker 4: the division of labor, they have totally unempowered us, taken
Speaker 4: us away from our source of labor. This is what
Speaker 4: the use of the trade union was. The union came
Speaker 4: in to be the entering wedge between man and his
Speaker 4: most powerful ability and skill to make money or prosper
Speaker 4: off his own labor.
Speaker 1: That's why were the sugar and coffee culture too. That
Speaker 1: was that was injected on purpose to get us all
Speaker 1: just up and ready to.
Speaker 6: Run right, same thing, sugar crazy ye, and then also yeah, Kane,
Speaker 6: sugar has like a very very strong addiction addictive property
Speaker 6: to it too.
Speaker 4: So Lennon says here, for example, the mechanics operations were
Speaker 4: filmed in the course of a whole day. After studying
Speaker 4: the mechanics movements, the efficiency experts provided him with a
Speaker 4: bench high enough to enable him to avoid losing time
Speaker 4: and bending down. He was given a boy to a system.
Speaker 4: This boy had to hand up each part of the
Speaker 4: machine in a definite, most efficient way. Within a few days,
Speaker 4: the mechanic performed the work of assembling the given type
Speaker 4: of machine in one fourth of the time it had
Speaker 4: taken before. So what an enormous gain in labor productivity.
Speaker 4: But the workers pay is not increased. This is a catch.
Speaker 4: The workers pay is not increased fourfold, but only half
Speaker 4: as much again at the very most, and only for
Speaker 4: a short period at that. As soon as the workers
Speaker 4: get used to the new system, their pay is cut
Speaker 4: to the former level. This is what people had a
Speaker 4: problem with. They could see it a mile away that
Speaker 4: the capitalists were just trying to exploit the worker further
Speaker 4: like they always have. And this is when the trade
Speaker 4: trade unionism is introduced into America and the union and
Speaker 4: really who brings manufacturer capital together with labor. Louis brandeis
Speaker 4: just like in the movie that we talked about last week.
Speaker 1: So when it went from being except Metropolis, yes exactly,
Speaker 1: So it went from being like exceptional work, fine job,
Speaker 1: great job, you know you're doing, you're doing above average.
Speaker 1: Two Oh, that's the minimum standard now, so you're getting
Speaker 1: the same pay that you did before. That's a reduction
Speaker 1: in pay for the same job that right. It didn't
Speaker 1: sit well too much.
Speaker 4: And this is what caused the wars. They you know,
Speaker 4: they could see it coming. They didn't want to be
Speaker 4: forced into something they didn't want to be doing that
Speaker 4: took away their ability to make money and to provide
Speaker 4: for their families without the perversion of authority. This is
Speaker 4: really where it all lies. And when you look at
Speaker 4: the Ludlow massacre, the Haymarket affair, all you know, at
Speaker 4: the turn of the twentieth century, there's murder happening by
Speaker 4: the Rockefellers against these people that are standing up just
Speaker 4: for safe working conditions and fair pay rightly.
Speaker 1: And obviously the legal system wasn't putting the Rockefellers or
Speaker 1: their henchmen in jail for these murders.
Speaker 4: No, they'd already taken over the news media. So you
Speaker 4: weren't You weren't finding out about all of these things.
Speaker 1: Yeah, apparently they weren't being prosecuted for it either.
Speaker 4: Yeah. So yeah, obviously here we are. JP Morgan is
Speaker 4: still a giant bank today. A lot of these guys
Speaker 4: that were at the Paris peace conference are still in charge.
Speaker 4: And yeah, I don't know how to switch that back,
Speaker 4: but you can't. So that's what I've got.
Speaker 1: Cool.
Speaker 4: You know, that's the last week or so of work.
Speaker 4: Is there anything else you want to cover?
Speaker 1: Yeah? You know, I'm gonna I'm gonna put up on
Speaker 1: the screen here something.
Speaker 4: It's I'm just gonna break away for a second.
Speaker 1: Yeah, sure, Yeah, I know. It's a bit humorous. I
Speaker 1: gotta find it first, So long with me? Is Gondu.
Speaker 3: All right?
Speaker 1: One of our peeps in the telegram group? Oh, I
Speaker 1: like this too. It says, there is no point trying
Speaker 1: to explain this scam to someone who didn't get it,
Speaker 1: who didn't get nine to eleven after twenty years. But
Speaker 1: let's look at this this I don't I don't like
Speaker 1: the way this guy ends his video. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: put that out there now. But it's a it's whatever
Speaker 1: the rest of it. I mean, it's kind of humorous,
Speaker 1: it's a little bit entertaining, still tells you the facts.
Speaker 1: So tis what tis?
Speaker 3: Then?
Speaker 1: And then he kind of I know, I'll explain what
Speaker 1: I what I think about his ending, and when we
Speaker 1: get to it.
Speaker 7: The official nine to eleven narrative is that brown people
Speaker 7: are genius? Is now who coordinated the most efficient cand
Speaker 7: terror campaign ever before seen the bypass of the world's
Speaker 7: biggest defense budget, and then was never able to even
Speaker 7: remotely replicate anything like it again. Honestly, I'm just impressed
Speaker 7: that people from the Hidden Sand Village could fly airplanes
Speaker 7: at all, let alone Steph Curry half Court no scope
Speaker 7: them into three really important buildings with perfect aim.
Speaker 3: That is a nine to eleven miracle.
Speaker 7: And it turns out there's a lot of miracle war
Speaker 7: going on with.
Speaker 2: Nine to eleven.
Speaker 1: And just so you know, there's a significance to the
Speaker 1: ears on his hat and you'll find out and the
Speaker 1: sword in his hand that he's got the props for it,
Speaker 1: past proch up with it. It's just it's a mess,
Speaker 1: but it's it's funny, you know it's But you'll see
Speaker 1: why it all makes sense in the second hear first
Speaker 1: start with God chose the Miracle Swan Jewish.
Speaker 7: This guy becomes the new owner of the Twin Towers
Speaker 7: after signing a ninety nine year.
Speaker 3: Least for three point two billion dollars.
Speaker 7: You might be thinking to yourself, Wow, this guy looks
Speaker 7: very honest and trustworthy. His name is Larry Silver signed
Speaker 7: you can't make this up. Larry did what any responsible
Speaker 7: would do after buying anything. He nailed and never before
Speaker 7: seen insurance policy. They covered the towers for double their value.
Speaker 7: His policy request was so fun and retarded that the
Speaker 7: broker had to bring together twenty five different insurance leinners
Speaker 7: to give him what he asked for, making him one
Speaker 7: of the first people in American history to get terrorism
Speaker 7: insurance on a commercial building.
Speaker 1: That's interesting, right, that that was the first time that happened,
Speaker 1: and it was so retarded that they had to get
Speaker 1: twenty five insurance companies together in order to phoney up
Speaker 1: the uh the policy, right, who has that type of
Speaker 1: leverage and power over insurance companies if you're not one
Speaker 1: of the chosen And as.
Speaker 7: We know, days later, Tamar and a Value slammed dump
Speaker 7: two planes into the tower, reducing Larry's multi into a
Speaker 7: pile of rubble and the insurance out in the history
Speaker 7: of the world.
Speaker 1: Now did you notice that they said a month and
Speaker 1: a half later. He didn't have those buildings all that long.
Speaker 1: They were their early sixties or mid sixties. I think
Speaker 1: it was sixty eight if I'm not mistaken. But when
Speaker 1: he got them, they were to be condemned. Basically, the
Speaker 1: amount of money would have cost for all these best
Speaker 1: that's to be removed. They were bought with this intent
Speaker 1: in mind from the very beginning.
Speaker 7: Yeah, exactly, Larry could have made its work on love,
Speaker 7: and unfortunately it's still alive to this day.
Speaker 2: The world not just rich.
Speaker 7: The God bless his miracles with the government gets fair
Speaker 7: as well. September tenth, of the day before nine to eleven,
Speaker 7: retards of depending On announced two point seven trillion dollars
Speaker 7: in the missing funds, only to have a tusting and
Speaker 7: raider park a Boeing seven to fifty seven directly in
Speaker 7: their accounting department.
Speaker 4: The next two.
Speaker 7: Minutes, after the second tower was hit two hundred and
Speaker 7: twenty five miles away, three buildings hit in less than
Speaker 7: an hour, and I love a miracle baby building the
Speaker 7: twin towers few Little Lolly's sister located sixteen hundred feet
Speaker 7: away from the impact site.
Speaker 2: Why he fell straight into the.
Speaker 7: Ground seven hours after the twin hours the news and
Speaker 7: the people that run it laying the small office fire.
Speaker 7: But every single structural engineer ever called that impossible, saying
Speaker 7: it was a controlled demolition, a perfect controlled demolition of
Speaker 7: an intact building. It is too bad engineers don't believe
Speaker 7: the miracles total miracle death. Now, I still have some questions,
Speaker 7: and there are questions that miracles can't quite answer. Why
Speaker 7: did Leslie Robertson, lead engineer for the Twin Powers, that
Speaker 7: you literally designed them to withstand the impact of the
Speaker 7: Boeing seven and seven airplane Until nine eleven, no steel
Speaker 7: structure in history has ever collapsed due to a fire.
Speaker 7: So how did it happen three times in a row
Speaker 7: in one day? Why did hundreds of survivors report explosions,
Speaker 7: heavy explosion, explosive, continuous explosion. Why did three of the
Speaker 7: point the US Naval Air Station military base as their
Speaker 7: primary address of residents on their drivers like that? Why
Speaker 7: should admit they deliberately avoided searching for explosive residues in
Speaker 7: their official investigation? Why did a dozen independent researchers find
Speaker 7: thermite and explosive materials back ground zero?
Speaker 3: Why is it given to this to do a white face?
Speaker 7: Well, when I do black face, it becomes this huge
Speaker 7: problem all of a sudden.
Speaker 2: Who is E team?
Speaker 7: And why were they a group of this rarely hard
Speaker 7: as living in the towers with unrestricted access leading.
Speaker 1: Up to nine to eleven, Speaking of which, who were.
Speaker 7: The dancing Israelis and why were they jailed and deported
Speaker 7: for only and celebrating the towers collapsed? Here were revealed
Speaker 7: as Mazad assets who were arrested after.
Speaker 4: Sharing and high fighting and videotaping the crash of the
Speaker 4: airplanes into the World Trade Towers.
Speaker 7: Why did thousands of the world's top engineers and architects
Speaker 7: form an entire organization to challenge the official nine to
Speaker 7: eleven lies and narratives? And why would anyone ever make
Speaker 7: a key shirt immortalizing and commemorating this disgusting attack on
Speaker 7: the American.
Speaker 3: Nation by its own government?
Speaker 7: And why is it for sale on my website? Everybody
Speaker 7: loves Twins That time I died on nine to eleven
Speaker 7: and was reincarnated as the loving husband of two.
Speaker 3: Beautiful twin anime girls.
Speaker 7: BOFE watches dot com Get it Get It ever pre
Speaker 7: sales now when it's gone.
Speaker 1: So, I mean, that was all fine and good until
Speaker 1: at the very end where he identified himself as a
Speaker 1: weak mail who watches tentacle porn.
Speaker 4: But I mean, whatever, yeah, well this is the day
Speaker 4: that I mean, it shouldn't just be today, but actually
Speaker 4: today should be the day that we honor. It's the
Speaker 4: other three hundred and sixty four days we should be questioning.
Speaker 4: What happened at nine to eleven?
Speaker 1: So I love buildings. Why don't they just start office fires?
Speaker 4: So they talk about insurance there, Brandeis is the founder
Speaker 4: of Savings Bank Life Insurance. Okay, so this is when
Speaker 4: they attach a Savings life insurance account to life insurance.
Speaker 4: This is what I had my securities licenses and life
Speaker 4: insurance licenses in. And who did I work for but
Speaker 4: Solomon Smith Barney. And so who was in World Trade
Speaker 4: Center seven? Solomon Smith Barney. This is who I worked for.
Speaker 4: And I just quit. I'd quit months prior to nine
Speaker 4: to eleven, and I was working.
Speaker 1: You're nowhere near that though in your own state.
Speaker 7: No.
Speaker 4: I was in Vancouver, Yeah yeah, yeah, but I was.
Speaker 4: I quit it, and I just took the first forklift job.
Speaker 4: I could get what I was doing on man.
Speaker 1: That's I mean, I ominion. If let's put this way,
Speaker 1: if you were putting up the numbers and you were
Speaker 1: doing doing the doing the work, and if the money
Speaker 1: was coming in the way it was it was, that's
Speaker 1: that's that's quite the change of lifestyle.
Speaker 4: We were actually identified as the largest unlicensed team in
Speaker 4: that company, and then we all worked to get licensed.
Speaker 4: This is what we did. And then we went out
Speaker 4: and fought against these savings bank life insurance policies and
Speaker 4: replaced them with term life insurance. Like you would have
Speaker 4: term insurance on your car, you would have term insurance
Speaker 4: on your house, so you have term insurance on your life.
Speaker 4: This is income replacement. But these guys were out giving
Speaker 4: life insurance to single people just to make a buck.
Speaker 4: There's no reason for life insurance at that point if
Speaker 4: you have no dependence. M right, because life insurance initially
Speaker 4: is meant to be income placement, not to make you rich.
Speaker 4: And it's Louis Brandeyes that brought in this combination of
Speaker 4: the two. And what happens is that, you know, as
Speaker 4: we grow older, the likelihood of us dying obviously increases,
Speaker 4: so the premium goes up, but the letter that comes
Speaker 4: through your mail slot every day, the premium stays the same,
Speaker 4: except whatever is above and beyond that is now being
Speaker 4: taken out of your savings bank, your savings and supplemented
Speaker 4: on top of that. So if you've got this life
Speaker 4: insurance policy for many many years and then the husband dies,
Speaker 4: maybe you know, forty years into his career, there's gonna
Speaker 4: be nothing left in that life insurance policy to help support.
Speaker 4: This is one of the biggest scams in America that
Speaker 4: nobody really knows about. And BRANDI started it. So we
Speaker 4: haven't even gotten into that. And this is really you know,
Speaker 4: where I would be considered an expert.
Speaker 1: That's also another protocol though, you get think about it,
Speaker 1: because that's that's the you know they talk about the speculation.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, and but also I mean that ties into
Speaker 1: the fact that there'd be nothing there after forty years.
Speaker 1: You're talking about the it's like an estate tax in
Speaker 1: a sense. It's it's going back after the what they
Speaker 1: call it the there's another word for it, you know,
Speaker 1: the inheritance, right, the inheritance to someone else' it's it's related.
Speaker 1: It's not exact, but I mean there's other irons in
Speaker 1: the in the fire that do that very thing. They're
Speaker 1: trying to talk take away everything that your predecessors and
Speaker 1: your family have also built and left for you and
Speaker 1: bring it all back to them again.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the longer you live, the less you make, the
Speaker 1: less you get.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I was in health, in life. I did. I did
Speaker 1: athlack for like, I don't know, a couple of months,
Speaker 1: but those it was ridiculous. I really like telling people
Speaker 1: shit they didn't need.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it was a scam, you know, and I was
Speaker 4: involved in it. But we we as far as I
Speaker 4: was concerned, we were helping families. And then the two
Speaker 4: thousand and eight stock stock market crash came. And this
Speaker 4: is where all the investments for because we would we
Speaker 4: would take we would replace the cash value life insurance
Speaker 4: or whole life insurance policy with a term life insurance policy,
Speaker 4: take whatever savings were there, and then invest it into
Speaker 4: mutual funds. And uh so that was invested into Wall
Speaker 4: Street largely. And so when Wall Street crashed, it actually
Speaker 4: uh destroyed millions and millions of families, several of which I.
Speaker 1: Know what about made off, made off, was making off
Speaker 1: of the money.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, from all that stuff.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that was happening while I was still in an
Speaker 1: electricians union in New York, right, And uh yeah, we're
Speaker 1: talking about like a bunch of the the Stonemasons, the
Speaker 1: brick layers. They were back to work after being retired
Speaker 1: because they lost everything.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 4: Yeah, one of our family friends. They were retired and
Speaker 4: then they had to go back and find work. So
Speaker 4: where were they working? But he and w mmm, it's
Speaker 4: like we should we should be.
Speaker 1: The restaurant like the or like the distributor in the.
Speaker 4: Restaurant, the fast food restaurant, right, and so no, this
Speaker 4: is why we do our work. This is why we
Speaker 4: do what we do because it's harmful to our way
Speaker 4: of life. Here and there's a direct attack on the
Speaker 4: nuclear family that's identified. Both the man and the woman
Speaker 4: in the west are both under attack and only an
Speaker 4: awareness of what is going on. Check this out and
Speaker 4: help us.
Speaker 1: It's a thresher says what did they what day did
Speaker 1: they bail out the banks in two thousand and eight?
Speaker 1: And he says eight ten eight, young Kipuller that year. Really,
Speaker 1: that's the ritual atonement.
Speaker 4: Right right, right right, the ultimate yea.
Speaker 1: Of the cursing of something else in that way, I can,
Speaker 1: I can, I can do anything I want to a child,
Speaker 1: because I'm just going to swing a chicken on my
Speaker 1: head later on.
Speaker 4: I did not know that that is that is profound
Speaker 4: too for sharing that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, alrighty, we got anything else, anything else you want
Speaker 1: to discuss?
Speaker 4: We could go on for days, man, But that's all
Speaker 4: I have for now.
Speaker 1: And uh yeah, looking into more of the Lincoln stuff.
Speaker 1: But he's going back to the place that now so
Speaker 1: that they don't stop him from looking at stuff.
Speaker 4: Yep, he's very interested in the Lincoln brandeis connection as
Speaker 4: are we, as are everybody should be. You know, it's
Speaker 4: throwing into question that who you know some of our
Speaker 4: most lauded historical figures.
Speaker 1: Or even the concepts that they voted. It's it's the
Speaker 1: ideas that we think come from noble sources that we're
Speaker 1: just we have the wrong people in government. Like no,
Speaker 1: these were actually weapons against you the whole time, sold
Speaker 1: to you with the pretty package and a bow, saying
Speaker 1: everything's gonna be better now and you have more peace
Speaker 1: and more security and all this other shit. But it's
Speaker 1: a lie, and it's all destructive. It's all corrosive. It's
Speaker 1: all erooding you from the inside and taking everything that
Speaker 1: you've ever worked for and leaving you dead.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Any and so the message I would say as
Speaker 4: we're ending this show today is that you know, beware
Speaker 4: of the language because we've been fooled once. Shame on them,
Speaker 4: but this time around we're being fooled, and it's shame
Speaker 4: on us because we should already know by now the
Speaker 4: dangers of nice sounding words like sustainability. Right, this whole
Speaker 4: idea of progress has infiltrated our society, largely on this
Speaker 4: unattainable ideal through noble lies that the future will one
Speaker 4: day be perfect. It's very socialists. You know, Lenin called
Speaker 4: it scientific socialism by applying tailorism. So we've got to
Speaker 4: step out of this idea that you know, China and
Speaker 4: Russia and the Americans are all fighting each other because
Speaker 4: there's great examples that show that they're actually working together.
Speaker 4: Much like the Godfather when they all got around the
Speaker 4: table and they had to sort of fill their roles.
Speaker 4: They couldn't. They knew that each one of them individually
Speaker 4: weren't going to just totally take control. The best way
Speaker 4: was to, you know, find some common ground and together
Speaker 4: do this. And that's what we see the Paris Peace
Speaker 4: Conference as. Yeah. Yeah, and with the whole idea of
Speaker 4: the scientific expert dis governing society.
Speaker 1: Right, you can't Doug shout not question at least tell you,
Speaker 1: And that.
Speaker 4: Is Costi's positivism. This is what it was. You can't
Speaker 4: put brakes on a turning wheel. And that's what Compty's
Speaker 4: positivism did. They had to first lay down the theory
Speaker 4: of evolution, this idea that humans evolve first because then
Speaker 4: our minds are fertile to understanding that we must also progress.
Speaker 1: The X Club is part of that, and you know,
Speaker 1: obviously the whole Thomas Suxley being the bulldog of Darwinism
Speaker 1: and darwin His his suggestions led to like a massacre
Speaker 1: of Aborigines on a particular island somewhere because they were
Speaker 1: too far behind to be fixed.
Speaker 4: Well, yeah, this whole idea of Darwinism survival of the fittest,
Speaker 4: gets borrowed from their spencer, Herbert Spencer. He's another key guy.
Speaker 4: To understand that they attributed all of these aspects of
Speaker 4: this is future animals and plants to humans. This is
Speaker 4: why Albert Borla, the head of Pfizer, is only a
Speaker 4: veterinarian today and people listen to them because they think
Speaker 4: that animals and humans are the same thing. And I
Speaker 4: don't believe that we have a conscience and abilities of
Speaker 4: our brain that animals don't necessarily share.
Speaker 1: My cat does, right, that's pretty awesome. Yeah, I love.
Speaker 4: Yeah, right, And in many ways, our cat or our
Speaker 4: pets are smarter than us, right, Like there's a book
Speaker 4: written called Your Dog is Your Mirror because your dog
Speaker 4: can teach you so much about yourself. This is true.
Speaker 4: But we have cognitive ability that animals that just don't
Speaker 4: have scientifically proven. We are a different entity than just
Speaker 4: an animal that is not necessarily our genus. We are
Speaker 4: human beings and we shouldn't be subjugated.
Speaker 1: Like, who is this got to go? I don't know
Speaker 1: what they're promoting here or who the hell they're talking about,
Speaker 1: but this is done. You funked up for the last time,
Speaker 1: my friend?
Speaker 4: What was it?
Speaker 7: Uh?
Speaker 1: No, just somebody trash talking, No, just promoting their own
Speaker 1: stuff on the and the jat dropping fifteen hundred links
Speaker 1: to other people's stuff and then people to follow them.
Speaker 1: Who about you? Yeah, oh he's done. Hey, we're getting
Speaker 1: big enough to now we have we have we have trolls,
Speaker 1: and then we have bots and trolls.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's good stuff, good stuff, all right. So on
Speaker 1: that note, just if you haven't seen the beginning of
Speaker 1: this episode, if you came in a little bit later,
Speaker 1: I encourage you to start from the beginning. If you
Speaker 1: missed any of what Nick was talking about, if you
Speaker 1: missed the very kind introduction by Dave Gehery today, I
Speaker 1: highly recommend going back and listening to that as well,
Speaker 1: and he emphasized it. I can't emphasize it enough. You know,
Speaker 1: the show does need support. The equipment that I'm working
Speaker 1: on here is put together with duct tape and clue.
Speaker 1: At this point, there's always constant problems. And I am
Speaker 1: working with the very last leg of this computer that's
Speaker 1: over right around ten years old and has had attacks,
Speaker 1: that has bios attacks, that's had all kinds of things problems.
Speaker 1: Things aren't working right. I can't don't print off of
Speaker 1: it anymore, I can't scan. It's stopped me from doing
Speaker 1: all that kinds of stuff. So I actually today, when
Speaker 1: I go leave here, I have to go get something notarized.
Speaker 1: I can't come back to my computer and just get
Speaker 1: it in for an email. I have to go to FedEx.
Speaker 1: Even though I have this freaking thing, two hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty dollars freaking printer here, I have to go. I
Speaker 1: have to go out and have some pay money to
Speaker 1: have it put on an email sent to me.
Speaker 4: And the nice yeah, and you know, we're seeing that
Speaker 4: in my life too, lots of that kind of thing,
Speaker 4: just more resistance, more obstruction, making it more difficult for
Speaker 4: word to get out. And so if there's anybody out
Speaker 4: there listening and watching that can't necessarily get involved and
Speaker 4: do some of the things that we're doing and get
Speaker 4: active in life, this is a great way to invest
Speaker 4: and inspire us to keep going, especially Daniel. Get him
Speaker 4: a new computer so that we can be more efficient
Speaker 4: in the way that we do things.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I get I get a. I do my
Speaker 1: best hues and I do I'm going to be putting
Speaker 1: a so a lot of the people do it, they
Speaker 1: do it, and I'm I'm anonymous, so I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to you know, I can kind of still see the name,
Speaker 1: but I'm not going to like blow it out and like, hey,
Speaker 1: if you do want to be anonymous, I get it,
Speaker 1: But I also want to make sure that people know
Speaker 1: that I appreciate it, you know what I mean. So, uh,
Speaker 1: let me just go ahead and share this for the
Speaker 1: support Daniel book. There you go. So Bulletproof Publishers, thou
Speaker 1: shalt the truth that shall set you free. In this
Speaker 1: Bulletproof phub dot com. This is you know Diego Rodriguez's
Speaker 1: work here, Diego Garcia. Sorry I don't know who Diego
Speaker 1: Rodriguez is another another one of my past guests.
Speaker 4: Actually it is, and I say, I say the truth
Speaker 4: shall set you free because a lot of people are
Speaker 4: out there crying freedom. Yeah, but you're putting the cart
Speaker 4: before the horse. You need truth before you.
Speaker 1: You need to have this working in order for you
Speaker 1: to become a good soldier. The brain, So where's the
Speaker 1: where's it? A? Do I find the things?
Speaker 4: Interesting? Link is gone? But right there? Help support game
Speaker 4: team by clicking the little white rabbit. Just follow the
Speaker 4: little white rabbit and it comes up with some options
Speaker 4: and how you can support us.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I have on the right the wrong present screen.
Speaker 1: Let me go do it right?
Speaker 4: Yeah, So that's that. Website is created by my friend
Speaker 4: Yon the Sledgehammer.
Speaker 1: Okay, so when you when you press that button, this
Speaker 1: is what pops up. Let's try it again. Very nice,
Speaker 1: you go.
Speaker 4: So the lot Yon Solay Living Trust is my partner.
Speaker 4: I'm going to probably ask him to change that title,
Speaker 4: but he's wanted to establish this website. He's one of
Speaker 4: my close friends. We were doing early pubcasts together. He's
Speaker 4: just got a busy life and so you know, we
Speaker 4: talk fairly often, especially when something goes wrong on the website.
Speaker 4: So I appreciate him getting on there and fixing things often.
Speaker 4: So any money or support sent to that link helps
Speaker 4: team BP.
Speaker 1: Nice.
Speaker 3: You heard it from me?
Speaker 1: And is this scannable? Is this the same thing?
Speaker 4: I believe you can scan that it'll send you to
Speaker 4: the same place. Okay, cool, so you can try that.
Speaker 4: I'm not familiar with this kind of technology. You should
Speaker 4: see me trying to pay with a debit card.
Speaker 3: Oh my god.
Speaker 4: They're like, it's got to go that way, the magnetic strap. Oh,
Speaker 4: you can use tap, you know. I'm like, I have
Speaker 4: no idea.
Speaker 1: You brought it up for me. I was like, I
Speaker 1: I am, for some reason have a an is it
Speaker 1: a phobia? I don't know. I won't tap. I refuse
Speaker 1: to tap. It's too freaky for me.
Speaker 4: Like when you think about it, When you think about it,
Speaker 4: you know, the the debit card was initially introduced into
Speaker 4: our society to protect us, right, so that you don't
Speaker 4: have a bunch of cash in your pocket. Somebody can
Speaker 4: steal your wallet and just spend your cash. Well, that
Speaker 4: you've got a card with a card road. Now you
Speaker 4: can just somebody will pick up a card and you
Speaker 4: can tap it and nobody ever asks. Right there goes
Speaker 4: the diminishing of our empowerment. Right there. The whole idea
Speaker 4: of having a card was, you know, faulty from the
Speaker 4: get go. And now what is happening, which is amazing
Speaker 4: to me as a fifty plus year old guy, is
Speaker 4: that twenty years ago we never paid with our credit cards.
Speaker 4: You never paid for shopping with your credit card. That
Speaker 4: means that you're actually adding a certain percent of interest
Speaker 4: on top of what you're making or what you're paying
Speaker 4: for what you're eating. Right, this is a crazy place
Speaker 4: that we are in society where you got to use
Speaker 4: your credit card.
Speaker 1: You can use your phone in Yeah, and it's what what?
Speaker 4: And I think soon the palm. Somebody just shared that
Speaker 4: the other day that it's like, yeah, we could go
Speaker 4: back to cash for sure.
Speaker 1: I definitely want something that's hackable and controlled by the
Speaker 1: government to be interfacing with my body mechanics. That sounds
Speaker 1: like a fantastic oh, and reading my thoughts, which they say.
Speaker 4: And then they jump into their tesla and every move
Speaker 4: and honk that they make is recorded, right, And have
Speaker 4: you ever driven in a Tesla? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I've been in them.
Speaker 4: Aren't they amazing? No, I mean like in a bad way,
Speaker 4: not in a bad way like I've been in one twice.
Speaker 4: And I couldn't believe that you're limited in the amount
Speaker 4: of honks that you can make. So yeah, things that
Speaker 4: are cyber truck is everything you do is recorded. I
Speaker 4: don't understand how people are involving themselves in such a automobile.
Speaker 4: It's crazy. Cult of personality. Elon Musk is the only
Speaker 4: answer I can I can suggest, But there's a growing
Speaker 4: number of people driving around in Tesla's and I just
Speaker 4: want to tell those people that's an indicator of how
Speaker 4: much you don't know in this world.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, that's a They have kill switches in regular vehicles.
Speaker 1: What do you think they can do with the one
Speaker 1: that they can use as a remote control toy whenever
Speaker 1: they decide that you're either out of your balance for
Speaker 1: your little grid city or you're now a criminal because
Speaker 1: they decided to change laws overnight, and now they're going
Speaker 1: to lock you in your car and either show up
Speaker 1: or they will drive you to the station.
Speaker 4: Easypsy right, Yeah, And so we must gauge our decisions on,
Speaker 4: you know, the practical aspect of it. We can't we can't,
Speaker 4: you know, make our decisions in this old system created
Speaker 4: by Jeremy Bentham, the hedonic calculator that we've gone through
Speaker 4: in the Rise of the Expert series. This is where
Speaker 4: all of this pleasure and avoidance of pain comes from
Speaker 4: in our society. You know, we've got to start gauging
Speaker 4: our decisions on their practical use and the truth of them,
Speaker 4: not how much pleasure or how how little pain they
Speaker 4: bring us. This is one of the brainwashes.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, so I want to ask you what is
Speaker 1: what is coming up for next Wednesday? Do you have
Speaker 1: a do you have in mind? Is this something that
Speaker 1: you guys are going to work out together? You and
Speaker 1: Nick or I would.
Speaker 4: Say that we're going to continue doing our research, will
Speaker 4: bring some more stuff. I held off of sharing some
Speaker 4: of this stuff on Facebook so that we could have
Speaker 4: it here on this show. I would say that we're
Speaker 4: going to continue to do our research. Hopefully we've got
Speaker 4: some more stuff, but we're going to continue on this
Speaker 4: this theme of the Rise of the Expert and how
Speaker 4: our society became so governed by the scientific expert. Now
Speaker 4: we can go into multiple chapters that we've done, the
Speaker 4: Rise of the University, the Rise My final article was
Speaker 4: the Rise of the Expert. So we can help into
Speaker 4: those things.
Speaker 1: Early and early and early, I guess, So what do
Speaker 1: you call it? Like a microso go lens on how
Speaker 1: things got to how they are now and what the
Speaker 1: progress of that was, like, what steps were taken, who
Speaker 1: was involved, which, like, kindly enough, they made it so
Speaker 1: that it's like four people, you know, doing everything and
Speaker 1: just directing everybody else, so that makes it a little
Speaker 1: bit easier. But how they interconnect that's going to blow
Speaker 1: people's minds, and that's going to make them like, oh shit.
Speaker 1: So we were overtaken a long time ago. Yes, yes
Speaker 1: we were, and by nineteen thirteen it was a done deal.
Speaker 1: By nineteen thirty three we were collateral and we no
Speaker 1: longer had anything.
Speaker 4: And this is this is one of the patterns that
Speaker 4: I see that I'm trying to break right now, is
Speaker 4: that a lot of historians and researchers think that history
Speaker 4: started with FDR or Israel started in nineteen forty eight. Right,
Speaker 4: it's all of we just don't understand how deep this
Speaker 4: history goes because it doesn't just start with Woodrow Wilson
Speaker 4: in nineteen seventeen and Louis brandeis, but it goes back,
Speaker 4: like we're saying, through Lincoln and this is all going
Speaker 4: to go back as we so the Illuminati to the
Speaker 4: to Bohemia.
Speaker 1: I mean, I would even start with Andrew Jackson being
Speaker 1: the last American president or pretty close to it, doing
Speaker 1: what he did, you know, worring off his own assassination
Speaker 1: and attempts from Rothschild agents, getting shot at, and then
Speaker 1: also beat the guy with a cane and his like seventies,
Speaker 1: that's pretty cool, and you know, got rid of the
Speaker 1: debt and did the things that he wasn't supposed to do,
Speaker 1: like make us self sufficient again, only to what is it,
Speaker 1: thirty years later, have us engage in a war against
Speaker 1: each other that put us in such a deep debt
Speaker 1: that it was completely wiped away everything that Andrew Jackson
Speaker 1: had done, put us right back into slavery.
Speaker 4: Well, this whole movement comes straight through the federalist papers.
Speaker 4: This is when they had the first idea of a
Speaker 4: centralized federal government. So it's a.
Speaker 1: He's a shit, Yeah, it's all right, Hamilton was John J.
Speaker 1: Hamilton and whoever else, but Hamilton was totally a Rothschild
Speaker 1: banking agent. Yeah, that's why he's celebrated in People like
Speaker 1: Thomas Jefferson are told were told it was a racist.
Speaker 4: Right, that same thing that they say about Woodrow Wilson,
Speaker 4: except they exploited Woodrow Wilson, right, and they made him
Speaker 4: out to look at least racist. And I'm not saying
Speaker 4: that he wasn't because back in the day there was
Speaker 4: all of these things happening. But today identify Woodrow Wilson
Speaker 4: as the problem, and it's because of racism. Is to
Speaker 4: take you off the scent, of course. So they infiltrated
Speaker 4: Woodrow Wilson like they did Oliver Wendell Holmes, like I
Speaker 4: suggested at the beginning of this podcast, because he was
Speaker 4: open to experimenting with the US Constitution, which Theodore Roosevelt wasn't.
Speaker 4: This is publicly stated by him that the reason why
Speaker 4: there was a breakup between the House of Truth, the
Speaker 4: New Republic, and Theodore Roosevelt was because he did. When
Speaker 4: they broached the subject of experimenting on the US Constitution,
Speaker 4: Roosevelt pushed back Woodrow Wilson didn't. Woodrow Wilson wanted a
Speaker 4: parliamentary government. His dissertation for his PhD was written on
Speaker 4: the advantages of the British parliamentary system, and his father
Speaker 4: helped split the Presbyterian Church into a North and South.
Speaker 4: These are just players in their epoch and their fathers
Speaker 4: and their grandfathers before. This is what we're showing, right.
Speaker 4: Brandeis's grandfather and great grandfather were great leaders of the
Speaker 4: frankest revolutionary movements Frankes. Yes, yeah, they were deep frankest
Speaker 4: and not just involved but leading the trust.
Speaker 1: And remember that's blood drinking, eating a flesh child, rape, incest,
Speaker 1: wife swapping ohen by the way, they eat fats and
Speaker 1: are not supposed to Who cares about that party?
Speaker 4: I just saw somebody say, fol the Roosevelts.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Another thing that Nick brought to my attention was a
Speaker 4: serial killer and I'll never remember his name right now,
Speaker 4: but his middle name was Theodore Roosevelt and he murdered. Uh,
Speaker 4: he was murdering people around DuPont Circle, which is where
Speaker 4: the House of Truth is in Washington. And so uh,
Speaker 4: that's another a whole interesting aspect to all of this,
Speaker 4: that is, you know, associated with this rise of the expert,
Speaker 4: I think that a lot of these serial killers were manufactured.
Speaker 1: Oh, of course, military intelligence all day. This is a
Speaker 1: too in the sixties, Yeah.
Speaker 4: Totally, and so under and I went and investigated a
Speaker 4: little bit of the DuPont circle and it's there's amazing
Speaker 4: tunnels and all kinds of stuff going on underneath that
Speaker 4: we we just weren't familiar with. So DuPont named after.
Speaker 1: I think Inkley was one of them too, Sure he
Speaker 1: was sure?
Speaker 4: Yeah, didn't he have famous book in his possession, Catcher
Speaker 4: in the Rye, just like the murderer of John Lennon?
Speaker 4: Did you know? It's like we got a.
Speaker 1: And which one was it that was shouting?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 1: Was it was it Hinkley or was it the guy
Speaker 1: who went after No? I think it was Hinkley. What's
Speaker 1: the frequency Kenneth?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 4: No, I don't know. That does ring a bell? But
Speaker 4: that's after them wrote that song? Was the frequency Kenneth? Really?
Speaker 4: I didn't know to see how this all overlaps into
Speaker 4: pulp culture, you know, that's a that's a whole other
Speaker 4: area that this is actually one thing I wanted to
Speaker 4: say I've been meaning to say, is that there is
Speaker 4: so much work here. There are so many avenues that
Speaker 4: we can go down and research this progressive era and
Speaker 4: this rise of the expert that if there's any researchers
Speaker 4: out there looking for something to stay claim to and
Speaker 4: plant a flag in, man, there is a ton of
Speaker 4: work here. I am now pretty much known as the
Speaker 4: host of truth Guy, the Louis Brandey's guy. You know, uh,
Speaker 4: the future perfect cybernetics. Like, I've gotten into all of
Speaker 4: these things, but there's countless other areas that you could
Speaker 4: build a total life long career on investigating. And what
Speaker 4: we were just talking about is one of those that
Speaker 4: you the publishing houses of pop culture Tin pan Alley,
Speaker 4: the origins of pop music in America infiltrated by the Jews,
Speaker 4: exploiting the intelligent, creative songwriters, revoking any song credits or
Speaker 4: ability for these songwriters to make any money. Does this
Speaker 4: sound familiar? This happened at the same time one hundred
Speaker 4: years ago, and they are using pop culture and music
Speaker 4: in the same way as they do Hollywood to demoralize
Speaker 4: the listener. I mean, look at the music that we
Speaker 4: have nowadays, death metal, you know, all of these things.
Speaker 1: Man, Look look at the freaking rap culture.
Speaker 4: Rap culture, just disintegrating the black populations, right, taking the
Speaker 4: black man out. I have the new Jim Crow book
Speaker 4: on my bookshelf here right now. And she goes deep
Speaker 4: into how they exploit it the black man just as
Speaker 4: they're exploiting the white man.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 4: They want to destroy our values and traditions.
Speaker 1: Get them killed, get them killing each other.
Speaker 4: And where does everything start for humans but around the family, right,
Speaker 4: this fat the nuclear family. So you can see that
Speaker 4: there's entering wedges all over the place. Female liberation all
Speaker 4: you know, CIA directive, Gloria Steinem working directly with the
Speaker 4: CIA to popularize the idea of feminism, and we see
Speaker 4: how it infiltrates our society today.
Speaker 1: Steinem, that doesn't sign Irish.
Speaker 4: There's an Ian and I in there too, she admits it.
Speaker 4: This is again another documented historical reality.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So I think we've concluded that no matter where you
Speaker 1: look and whatever topic it is, it's always the Eskimos
Speaker 1: every time.
Speaker 4: Right, And it is true that everywhere you look, and
Speaker 4: it is true that there is a giant conspiracy going on,
Speaker 4: But like you said earlier, there's maybe four guys that
Speaker 4: are really running it. And this is how you can
Speaker 4: do it. And if anybody ever wants to know how
Speaker 4: they do it, watch the movie Capricorn one. It shows
Speaker 4: you how they could fake a moon landing and fool
Speaker 4: everybody and they only need really one person to know.
Speaker 4: So that's all scientific expert too, right.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, they appeal to the authority, and they believe
Speaker 1: that they would they lie to us about this. You know,
Speaker 1: that's too crazy of an idea, and they're trying to
Speaker 1: tell everybody this. There's no way they would.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, And it was well into my research that
Speaker 4: I discovered logical fallacy. Now this is a great empowering
Speaker 4: piece of knowledge to know that the lies that politicians
Speaker 4: use actually are categorized, have names and definitions, right, but
Speaker 4: the most popular are the argumentum ad hominem right, personal
Speaker 4: attacks against the person, ridicule, or ultimately the appeal to authority.
Speaker 4: This is why those headlines say experts say with no
Speaker 4: source material, because you are falling for a large fallacy,
Speaker 4: and most of the television public don't know that such
Speaker 4: a thing exists. They don't know that there is logical fallacy.
Speaker 4: And once you understand that, you can't unsee it. And
Speaker 4: then when you watch television, they just pop out at you.
Speaker 1: I went through forty one of them in an old video,
Speaker 1: probably maybe over to maybe two years ago, but it
Speaker 1: was forty one of them that I found out, Like
Speaker 1: I had two different lists, but I was looking at
Speaker 1: him and some of them didn't match up. And I
Speaker 1: didn't like the way some of them were because they
Speaker 1: were also themselves partially propaganda, right and partiably you know,
Speaker 1: leading your brain to the wrong direction. So I had
Speaker 1: to kind of like fix them as I was talking
Speaker 1: about them. But a lot of it, you know, it
Speaker 1: was good information, but I just couldn't. I couldn't get
Speaker 1: over to the fact that even there they corrupted the data.
Speaker 1: It's like, obviously they would do that, right. But Thrasher
Speaker 1: says in the videos, like in Video Drone, which is
Speaker 1: an interesting movie, the TV is the retina of the
Speaker 1: mind's eye. The battle for America will be fought in
Speaker 1: the Video Drone, right, especially if we're in the fuck
Speaker 1: metaverse when it happens, because nothing will be real. We'll
Speaker 1: have accomplished zero in the real world. Just like I said,
Speaker 1: you know, you don't go after the disposable soldiers, you
Speaker 1: go for the generals. Otherwise, you're just wasting your time.
Speaker 1: Those disposable soldiers are like you know, it says on
Speaker 1: the back of that chair, not this one I'm sitting
Speaker 1: on right now, respawn, it's uh, it's you're, you're, you're,
Speaker 1: Until you until you hit the box of everything's coming
Speaker 1: out of you're, you're not going to be putting a
Speaker 1: dent into what they're doing. You got to go after
Speaker 1: the people behind it.
Speaker 4: Yeah. So I can't emphasize enough people. As you go
Speaker 4: through your day today and tomorrow and next week and
Speaker 4: next month, the next year, make sure that you're familiar
Speaker 4: with logical fallacy and this story of the rise of
Speaker 4: the expert, because this is everything. This will help you
Speaker 4: see who is controlling narratives and and who is honest? Right. Uh,
Speaker 4: this is a particular skill that we need today of
Speaker 4: discernment and who is telling you the truth? Well, how
Speaker 4: do you figure that out? But through a deductive process yourself.
Speaker 4: So if you don't know how to deductively chain reasoning together,
Speaker 4: get back to the trivium, grammar, logic, rhetoric, look to
Speaker 4: book up online and you can start working on these
Speaker 4: skills that they removed from you on purpose.
Speaker 1: I think there's another discernment as you're there too. It's
Speaker 1: not so much who's telling you the truth, it's who's
Speaker 1: honestly thinking that they're telling you the truth, even if
Speaker 1: their information is corrupt, because at least then you can
Speaker 1: discuss with them if you see something that's not correct,
Speaker 1: and have a conversation about that and learn from each other.
Speaker 1: But if you just always attack somebody because you know
Speaker 1: a piece of information that they didn't but they're not
Speaker 1: trying to deceive you, everybody will be an enemy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and that's what you be divided to.
Speaker 4: Yes, So there are three things right when you're looking
Speaker 4: for the truth, there's three things that you must remove
Speaker 4: to find the truth. So it's not necessarily about you
Speaker 4: finding something, but it's eliminating everything that's distracting you from it,
Speaker 4: and if you work well enough, you're going to find it.
Speaker 4: And those three things that you must remove are falsity
Speaker 4: of fact, logical fallacy, and contradiction. Okay, so when you
Speaker 4: see contradiction, which you see everywhere, people acting not in
Speaker 4: the way that they say, or you know, doing something
Speaker 4: that they said they weren't going to do, or making
Speaker 4: conclusions out of contradictory information, you'll be able to identify
Speaker 4: it a lot easier. And then and then step into
Speaker 4: the logic and ask those logical questions of who, what, why, where?
Speaker 1: When you know how many times I've seen people will
Speaker 1: not only use an opinion and call it a fact,
Speaker 1: but use a fact but make an erroneous connection to
Speaker 1: what they're discussing, which it has destinitely nothing to do
Speaker 1: with it. When you just follow the logic, it's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's true. And you know how they do this a
Speaker 1: lot with you don't like violence, do you? Or something
Speaker 1: stupid like that. But it's like, of course everyone's gonna
Speaker 1: say no, I don't want to, you know, and then
Speaker 1: they're gonna well, then what I'm saying over here has
Speaker 1: something to do with that, but it doesn't.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: It's like this, Yeah, it's not a solution, and you.
Speaker 4: Got to yeah, and you've got to understand the power
Speaker 4: of that question. That's a loaded question. It's like, for
Speaker 4: how long have you been beating your wife? There's not
Speaker 4: a real great way to write. They put you in
Speaker 4: this very uncomfortable position. This is what narcissists do, and
Speaker 4: then they blame you for your reaction to their toxic behavior.
Speaker 4: And this is something I really want to get into
Speaker 4: because the state and the people are exhibiting the same
Speaker 4: narcissistic behavior. We're trying to convince somebody like this school
Speaker 4: teacher I was talking about of forty five years, that
Speaker 4: our education system comes from Prussia. He's acting as a
Speaker 4: narcissist when he refuses to even look at what I'm doing. Right,
Speaker 4: And so we've also shown through the changing image as
Speaker 4: a man.
Speaker 1: And if they're so confident in their own why does
Speaker 1: it matter what they expose their brains to right like
Speaker 1: bike when they listen. Is it are they that high
Speaker 1: on their horse that it's a waste of their time
Speaker 1: or are they just fearful subconsciously that it might change
Speaker 1: their minds? That's it, And there's a trigger there because
Speaker 1: it's implanted through through this mind control shit that we're under.
Speaker 4: Yes, and so Daisy says something here. She says, truth
Speaker 4: is found in my gut, and that is absolutely true.
Speaker 4: This is what is part of the education they removed.
Speaker 4: That is a great piece of knowledge. Now what that
Speaker 4: is is it's the synthesis of your five senses, is
Speaker 4: found in your gut. So when now when you look
Speaker 4: at mainstream. They're going to tell you that the gut
Speaker 4: instinct is nothing that you can actually conclude anything on.
Speaker 4: You shouldn't trust your gut. This is what they say
Speaker 4: about doing our own research.
Speaker 1: Too, mission forget about all that.
Speaker 4: Don't look at the emails of Hillary. That's illegal. They
Speaker 4: tell you these out no whys. But the truth is
Speaker 4: found in our gut. It's the synthesis of our five census.
Speaker 4: This is what the trivium teaches us. This is the
Speaker 4: education they removed from our school system in the mid
Speaker 4: fifties and Latin, the Greek classics. Now we fail to
Speaker 4: see things allegorically or metaphorically because we don't have the
Speaker 4: backing of the Greek classics. And then the Trivium, the
Speaker 4: seven Liberal Arts is really what they primarily wanted to remove. Right,
Speaker 4: and this is the delineating factor between a state college
Speaker 4: and a big time university. Is the presence or the
Speaker 4: absence of the Seven Liberal Arts? And what are the
Speaker 4: first three grammar? Logic, rhetoric. We could flip this just
Speaker 4: by learning the first three, right, This gives us the.
Speaker 1: Ability rhetoric versus action is is a key to understanding
Speaker 1: how much full of shit somebody is right. You can
Speaker 1: say anything you want and all songs and nice and
Speaker 1: pretty yep. But when you when there's no you know,
Speaker 1: a parable action to what you're saying, then all you're
Speaker 1: doing is blowing smoke. And I found this interesting. I
Speaker 1: haven't seen the movie a long time to know that
Speaker 1: or remember it, or would have even made any difference
Speaker 1: to me. But back then, but of course we know
Speaker 1: since the last couple of years of you know what
Speaker 1: they say, meta means dead and Neil worked for metacor text.
Speaker 4: Yeah. And also I just found out this week that
Speaker 4: The Matrix and Terminator were written by a lady, a female.
Speaker 1: Are you familiar and say that? And I think it's
Speaker 1: a misdirection because it came a lot from uh, well,
Speaker 1: William what the hell's his name. I did a whole
Speaker 1: thing on.
Speaker 4: This before because I've been listening.
Speaker 1: To Johnny Demonic is a character out of his books,
Speaker 1: and that was, you know, the continuation of it. So
Speaker 1: there's Japanese traffic novels that they borrowed from, and then
Speaker 1: there's this Right Books series.
Speaker 4: Is what her book was.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you know, maybe that's.
Speaker 4: I haven't been able to read it.
Speaker 1: It's a misdirection. They've they awarded it to her. So
Speaker 1: now everybody says, well, then you're wrong because courts fuck off.
Speaker 1: Right if you look at the if you look at
Speaker 1: the is it William Burgess, Let's see.
Speaker 4: I don't know. I'm just sort of being introduced to
Speaker 4: this idea that the Matrix weren't written by the two
Speaker 4: Wuchowski brothers sisters.
Speaker 1: I don't think of the right name.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 4: And I also want to add here that we are
Speaker 4: actually showing the creation of the literal matrix. So when
Speaker 4: you watch the movie and they walk through that scene
Speaker 4: with the lady with Tim Gibbs dress, Sorry, William Gibson,
Speaker 4: William Gibson.
Speaker 1: It's just finally popped in my head.
Speaker 4: We and so Morpheus says, you feel it when you
Speaker 4: pay your taxes, you see it when you watch your television.
Speaker 4: We are showing how the matrix was created.
Speaker 1: Literally, So Neuromancer nineteen eighty four was one of the
Speaker 1: ones I was associated with it. Knemonic, there's a bunch
Speaker 1: of the wrote one of the when a Lisa overdrive
Speaker 1: count zero, I'll put up on the screen so you
Speaker 1: can see.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and I want to watch video drome too. I
Speaker 4: haven't seen that.
Speaker 1: No, that's with he is a good actor. I like,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna forget that name.
Speaker 4: Is it William duvall or.
Speaker 1: William Robert you're talking about video drome. Uh no, well
Speaker 1: he might be in it too, but it's what the
Speaker 1: I think.
Speaker 4: I'm thinking something totally different.
Speaker 1: I'll put it.
Speaker 4: He is in one of these. But this is William Gibson,
Speaker 4: Canadian fiction writer.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and there you have it. But I mean you
Speaker 1: can look at let's see just more.
Speaker 4: So, you're saying that the Wakowski brothers.
Speaker 1: The majority of the matrix. No, No, I'm saying that
Speaker 1: it was lifted from Gibson. This other woman was ah.
Speaker 4: And so this story, the black lady writing it is
Speaker 4: covering for the story of William Gibson.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's if that's even a thing,
Speaker 1: Like it doesn't sound like logical in my head, But
Speaker 1: I just don't understand where this woman comes from out
Speaker 1: of nowhere. But when you can equate it like directly
Speaker 1: to these books too, like even like the Giantnemonic characters,
Speaker 1: when Neil is based off how does that not play
Speaker 1: a part into it?
Speaker 4: And I can't read her book without buying it. But
Speaker 4: that's the first thing I went to do is to
Speaker 4: read it to see the similarities and see if.
Speaker 3: This is.
Speaker 1: What it's not an archive dot or it is not.
Speaker 4: I think it's still in print. That's why you know, so.
Speaker 1: Video drome and oh is.
Speaker 4: Video Drome with Canoe Reeves in it too?
Speaker 1: Do you see it on screen or know?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 4: Video Drome nineteen eighty three. Yep, James Woods.
Speaker 1: Yeah, James Woods is a.
Speaker 4: I should actually do what I did about ten years ago.
Speaker 1: Let's do the shoiler. Just let's have to take it,
Speaker 1: take it and put it back up, and then we'll
Speaker 1: call it after that, because I gotta go check out
Speaker 1: my van.
Speaker 4: I wrote a list of all of the Jewish producers
Speaker 4: and actors throughout history, and it's basically all of Hollywood.
Speaker 1: It's yeah, and then they threw out a couple of
Speaker 1: spaghetti lesions for the Italians. Right, alright, let's see, let's
Speaker 1: do this.
Speaker 4: James Woods, famous right wing Republican conservative trumpet fan, I
Speaker 4: think too.
Speaker 1: Oh, he's also a do you guys hear it?
Speaker 7: All?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: So he's also allegedly one hundred and sixty five IQ. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a little little three effect that's pretty high. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's pretty high. Come to me, don't keep me waiting please,
Speaker 1: kind of already has the metropolis feel to it, right
Speaker 1: with the step.
Speaker 5: Videodrome the most provocative motion picture experience of our time.
Speaker 4: I love that kind of stuff.
Speaker 5: From the creator of Scanner's, starring James Woods and Deborah.
Speaker 4: Harry Deborah Harry's and a Blondie. It controls your mind,
Speaker 4: then it destroys your body.
Speaker 6: Videodromee coming soon to a theater near you from Universal Pictures.
Speaker 4: Some of the sounds in the background, right, just morning
Speaker 4: sex on. Wow, that's amazing. That's exactly the kind of
Speaker 4: uh material I like watching. It's a little bit campy
Speaker 4: b movie, but important.
Speaker 1: Hey you guys can see the screen.
Speaker 4: Too, right, guy with a go pro fishing show?
Speaker 1: Yeah, everybody go subscribe to this guy please. I said
Speaker 1: I wanted to see this hit the thousand before the
Speaker 1: end of next month. So come on, guys, let's let's
Speaker 1: hit this up. We can use its a lot of
Speaker 1: things from people. When you get a thousand subscribers on YouTube.
Speaker 1: Just help him out.
Speaker 4: Man, Is this the guy that we were watching earlier? Yeah?
Speaker 4: This is gonna be a bass fishing hat on.
Speaker 1: Oh no, totally different person. Oh okay, not the guy
Speaker 1: that was doing the thing. No, this is this is
Speaker 1: a fishing primarily talking about fishing, really really good channel,
Speaker 1: good stuff.
Speaker 4: So I'll go find this guy with a go pro fishing.
Speaker 1: YEP camera and he's run BMC in the comments too. Okay, cool,
Speaker 1: all right, so I think we're gonna call it. I
Speaker 1: got it. I don't want to. I don't want to
Speaker 1: figure out what I have to pay for this freaking
Speaker 1: AC I want to know. I don't want to waste
Speaker 1: my time standing out one hundred twelve degree whether to
Speaker 1: find out it's not gonna be a fun day for me.
Speaker 4: Well, let let there be good news for you today.
Speaker 3: My man.
Speaker 1: All right, man, thank you, and I'll see you next Wednesday.
Speaker 4: Sure, thank you for having me on. Thanks everybody for watching.
Speaker 4: To talk to you guys later.
Speaker 1: See you
Speaker 3: Goo