Speaker 1: Good morning. It is seven thirty a m. On September
Speaker 1: twenty six, twenty twenty four. I have a ton of
Speaker 1: work to do. Finally got the supplies I need, and
Speaker 1: now it's time to disappear from the world after this
Speaker 1: video for a while. This Saturday, my daughter has a
Speaker 1: gymnastics performance. Has some benefit that I don't really agree with,
Speaker 1: but raising money for allopathic bullshit. But it's not about
Speaker 1: that with her. She's just a gymnast on a performance team.
Speaker 1: So of course, you know, anyhow, been reading when I
Speaker 1: go to the gymnastics with my daughter. I read very
Speaker 1: slowly from this because I'm watching as well. But I
Speaker 1: got like twenty pages deep in this, and I have
Speaker 1: some good news. I did the the check yesterday and
Speaker 1: we are at one thousand, three hundred and ninety one
Speaker 1: on the eighteen hundred goal for the computer. So I said,
Speaker 1: four fifty is what's left. Because they everybody takes their
Speaker 1: slice before it gets to the bank, right, so Stripe
Speaker 1: does give seng Go takes like two percent or something
Speaker 1: like that, and then there might be other transaction fees.
Speaker 1: So that's why I said four to fifty. But any anyhow,
Speaker 1: that gives en Go is the long standing same link
Speaker 1: for supporting the show at any time. So I also
Speaker 1: never factored in that I might need to purchase an
Speaker 1: OS software. Oops, And so I don't know if that
Speaker 1: covers the da Vinci Resolve paid version or not. So
Speaker 1: if it goes a little over, great, If we get there, awesome,
Speaker 1: And I'll start listening the components and what I'm getting
Speaker 1: on the gifts and go so people can see what
Speaker 1: I'm actually using it for. And then I will show
Speaker 1: you as they come in the components and the process,
Speaker 1: the progress of me putting it together and figuring it
Speaker 1: all out and stuff like that. All right, all right,
Speaker 1: if I had time lapse and like, you know, people,
Speaker 1: instead of having a set up a camera and then
Speaker 1: do something, it would basicilly I would do like a tutorial.
Speaker 1: But I'm not gonna probably do that. These videos usually
Speaker 1: do well too, let's see. Yeah, so there's a lot
Speaker 1: of weird things going on, but I want to start
Speaker 1: with this, and it's right here. This is an older
Speaker 1: video from Jimmie DeLux four years ago, but it's it
Speaker 1: pertains to the virus mania stuff that we were talking
Speaker 1: about and about to read that part to you. I
Speaker 1: want to read a lot of this book to you,
Speaker 1: because between that and you have to you have to
Speaker 1: take that what we're reading here, what I've explained and
Speaker 1: have urged people to do and seek out the videos
Speaker 1: that I put up. They weren't me that made them.
Speaker 1: It was a recording of a lecture that doctor Stefan
Speaker 1: Laka did in Germany. And somebody is so dense they're like,
Speaker 1: that's not his real voice. I know, No, he's speaking German.
Speaker 1: And Steve Falconer from Spacebusters, who knows that doctor Laca
Speaker 1: did the narration in English so other people could could
Speaker 1: benefit from it. Dope, Ah, that's time such a conspiracy theorist. Yeah,
Speaker 1: good job, good job buddy. Anyhow, so that's that. Get
Speaker 1: those videos underneath your belt. And also I would look
Speaker 1: into the one I did on bes Schamp or maybe
Speaker 1: just check it out. And because I haven't heard, they
Speaker 1: haven't mentioned in Virus MANI yet, which I'm kind of
Speaker 1: disappointed either by Schamp, which would have if during their
Speaker 1: talk with about Pastor, Or should have brought him up
Speaker 1: and he should have been the primary antagonist, well, actually protagonist.
Speaker 1: I would call Pastor the antagonist in this situation. But
Speaker 1: backed by the hidden hand and the Rothschild's money. So
Speaker 1: there is an agenda. This was always set up to harm.
Speaker 1: And when I go through these chapters of the virus mania,
Speaker 1: it's just it's sickening the pattern and what I connect
Speaker 1: add to that and how off the mark. This whole
Speaker 1: concept of drugs is for fixing your body. It poisons
Speaker 1: you in various ways, and those are not side effects,
Speaker 1: those are direct intentional effects. The people behind these pharmaceutical
Speaker 1: companies want you dead. Everybody wants you dead. Your government
Speaker 1: wants you dead. The FBI wants you dead, everybody, everybody.
Speaker 1: And apparently there's ports closing because of what do you
Speaker 1: call it, unions Marxist communist unions who are in lockstep
Speaker 1: tools of the government when it's a corrupt government. And
Speaker 1: you know, the little political theater blah blah blah. They're
Speaker 1: not connected, sure, they're not sure, they're not in the
Speaker 1: political theater. That you have some fat man with orange
Speaker 1: with orange skin about the ride in on his white horse.
Speaker 1: Stop it. He's telling you right to your face that
Speaker 1: if you speak freely and openly, you could go to
Speaker 1: jail or worse. He mentioned the death penalty, all to
Speaker 1: protect the protected class, the same people who happen to
Speaker 1: be the financiers of the world. So what choice and
Speaker 1: what hope do we have? Well on that scale, when
Speaker 1: you think about it, armies worth of people against you,
Speaker 1: like little armies, trained ones authorities, heavily armed, and I'm
Speaker 1: guaranteeing you there's going to be a push for disarmament
Speaker 1: of us again because the UN is making moves as well.
Speaker 1: The IMF and the UN are interlocked, and so is
Speaker 1: the Vatican and whatever else you want to believe about
Speaker 1: the Holy See, and obviously the Rothschilds because that's the IMF,
Speaker 1: that's the bank of international sentiments, that's the central banks
Speaker 1: around the world. They are all and people will ask, well,
Speaker 1: how are they connected? Well, was it a bunch of
Speaker 1: white Europeans that were the first founders of the church
Speaker 1: or was it Chase and were Rothschilds pictured and depicted
Speaker 1: with either the Cross of Saint Sylvester, which is an
Speaker 1: honorary thing for service to Rome, or was it the
Speaker 1: Knights of Malta Because the Knights of Malta also oversee
Speaker 1: United Nations, which means they are like the managers, right,
Speaker 1: and the Security Council and the General Assembly. They skirted
Speaker 1: the veto power of nations a long time ago. And
Speaker 1: that's something that you can read about and behold a
Speaker 1: pale horse, and that's you can find that online. I
Speaker 1: would never recommend somebody to get a book from from
Speaker 1: a living author in a free way, but if someone
Speaker 1: else is benefiting from it after their death, then they
Speaker 1: were most likely the enemies of that person. You don't
Speaker 1: need to give them your money. His family isn't getting
Speaker 1: any of it. His family disappeared right for their safety.
Speaker 1: Who knows where Dorothy and Annie? And though Dorothy would
Speaker 1: be Pooh, that was her nickname, why I can't think
Speaker 1: of the other one. It's in my book. I don't remember, though.
Speaker 1: I think it's Alison. Yeah, it's Alison. Well then even
Speaker 1: to look it up. So let's get this started. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna put this video called Fauci's Guinea Pigs, and then
Speaker 1: we're going to go from there. It says Fauci's foster Kids,
Speaker 1: but it's Falchi's Guinea Pigs. And the thing here.
Speaker 2: Warning, I chain smoke and I say fuck a lot,
Speaker 2: but I accept myself with the way I am.
Speaker 1: I accept you too.
Speaker 2: Viewer discretion advised, well, I got strike number two and
Speaker 2: I cannot blue it for two weeks on my main channel,
Speaker 2: so I'm hanging by until it comes back, if it does,
Speaker 2: saying that Dauchi was pretty much killing them with AZT
Speaker 2: And another video I made was called a Noble Nobel
Speaker 2: about Garry Mollis, PCR inventor. Well, I think most of
Speaker 2: us are familiar with by now and things that he
Speaker 2: had to say about Fauci in the nineties, So I
Speaker 2: already knew about all that, But I didn't know about
Speaker 2: Fauchi's foster kids.
Speaker 1: And I don't understand his shirt, and I don't support
Speaker 1: a man wearing a shirt this is feminist on it.
Speaker 1: This isn't my video. Just wanted to clarify that.
Speaker 2: From Justin News July twenty three to twenty twenty. Earlier
Speaker 2: this month, doctor Anthony Fauci offered a pointed response to
Speaker 2: those who have challenged his stewardship of the pandemic as
Speaker 2: a nation's infectious disease chief. Quote. I think you can
Speaker 2: trust me, he declared, citing his long record of service
Speaker 2: in government medicine. That is exactly what Vacci's National Institute
Speaker 2: of Allergies and infectious diseases ANIAID agency declared years ago to
Speaker 2: foster children in New York.
Speaker 1: So infectious diseases is also a claim without substantiation. Ever,
Speaker 1: contagion has never been proven period. This is all the
Speaker 1: smoke screen of modern medicine MD directed medicine and very faulty, ridiculous, ignorant,
Speaker 1: deliberately stupid science from non scientists who happen to wear
Speaker 1: lab coats. But they would never pass the snuff when
Speaker 1: it came to how science was supposed to be conducted,
Speaker 1: even though Robert Coke was a freaking criminal himself. The
Speaker 1: Coke's postulate has never been followed by these people. There's
Speaker 1: never any controls, there's no placebo group, they're none of this.
Speaker 1: And they say, well, it's they're so confident in their
Speaker 1: poisoned drugs that they'll say it would be a crime
Speaker 1: against humanity if we were to deny these people these
Speaker 1: life saving all assumption and presumption because he haven't even
Speaker 1: tested whether or not it's safe yet, and you're using
Speaker 1: other people who are volunteering. You know, people probably walk
Speaker 1: into those into those case studies thinking that well, they
Speaker 1: must have already screened to make sure that it's safe
Speaker 1: for me. Antibiotics could freaking kill you. I don't agree
Speaker 1: that antibiotics are good for you at all, honestly, and
Speaker 1: there's multiple side effects to them. They weaken the body,
Speaker 1: they do all kinds of damage. I'm not a fan
Speaker 1: of antibiotics. I don't think if I was going, if
Speaker 1: I'm gonna put together a go bag or a bug
Speaker 1: out bag, I would bother wasting any space on antibiotics
Speaker 1: for any freaking reason.
Speaker 2: Ork, Illinois and elsewhere, many of whom were enrolled in
Speaker 2: an AIDE scrug trial without the promised patient protections and
Speaker 2: investigation concluded the NIAID's Aid Research division that reported the
Speaker 2: FAUCCI had failed in many cases to provide patient advocates
Speaker 2: to monitor the foster kids' health as promised.
Speaker 1: So foster children, all right, these are children that when
Speaker 1: I was watching another video hour and a half long
Speaker 1: or whatever presumed cases. First of all, the PCR test
Speaker 1: doesn't tell you have age, doesn't tell you have a virus.
Speaker 1: It doesn't. They've never isolated anything to be able to
Speaker 1: look for the to know what to look for. They
Speaker 1: say that there's these antibodies, Well, how do you know
Speaker 1: what it is? As an antibody. If that is even
Speaker 1: really a thing. I think that's another smoke screen. If
Speaker 1: you don't know what it's an antibody. Two, it's an
Speaker 1: indirect method. And it doesn't make any sense whatsoever, just
Speaker 1: basic common sense. This is not hard to figure out.
Speaker 1: But when it's set on TV and authorities and officials,
Speaker 1: you have that, you know, logical fallacy in your mind.
Speaker 1: This appeal to authority, Well, appeal to authorities when you're
Speaker 1: when you're citing something. But it's the it's you know what,
Speaker 1: you get it trusted sources type of thing, right, trust
Speaker 1: based on their merit. You get what I'm saying this
Speaker 1: This None of this has ever been proven ever at
Speaker 1: any other time, anytime that you can point to, Well, well,
Speaker 1: these people all got sick, and they must have gotten
Speaker 1: sick from other people. Well, did they all eat the
Speaker 1: same pesticide food where they all malnourished? Did it happen
Speaker 1: in an area where they're doing some sort of industrial
Speaker 1: chemical dumping? Are they around power lines? Are there any
Speaker 1: other many factors that they never ever look at. They
Speaker 1: just look for this phantom unicorn freaking virus. And when
Speaker 1: you look for nothing else, you're going to come up
Speaker 1: with something, and that something is always a bag of bs.
Speaker 1: It's vapor. So now these are children who have presumed
Speaker 1: or assumed cases they don't not all of them even
Speaker 1: tested positive with a fake test that doesn't do shit.
Speaker 1: It's not a fake test, but the results are meaningless,
Speaker 1: and they're faster children instead awards of the state, and
Speaker 1: they get sucked into this horrible program of poisoning them
Speaker 1: with high doses of AZT. It's more of a torture
Speaker 1: test to see the what do you call it, the
Speaker 1: lethality of it, more than anything else. And then they
Speaker 1: would go through a study like this and say, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a proof for children, after they killed a bunch
Speaker 1: of them. So you can't trust the FDA. You cannot
Speaker 1: trust anything that you hear about these medicines. And if
Speaker 1: they do it here, they do it with every one
Speaker 1: of these medicines. The FDA is the most disgusting, despicable,
Speaker 1: and so what does the CDC, and so is the
Speaker 1: real health organization. Every once in a while they'll speak
Speaker 1: a little truth, but it doesn't matter because the whole
Speaker 1: system is geared to freaking annihilate you.
Speaker 3: City of New York had been forcing HIV positive children
Speaker 3: under its supervision.
Speaker 1: Which again means nothing HIV positive. You don't even know
Speaker 1: that there's a virus. You don't know what that even means.
Speaker 1: You don't know what it is. You couldn't identify it
Speaker 1: if you saw it, and you can't see it because
Speaker 1: you've never found it, you've never isolated it. What does
Speaker 1: that even mean?
Speaker 3: To be used as human guinea pigs and tests for
Speaker 3: experimental aids drug trials. All the children in the program
Speaker 3: were under the legal guidance of the city's child welfare
Speaker 3: department known as the Administration for Children's Services or ACS.
Speaker 3: Most lived in foster care or independent homes run on
Speaker 3: behalf of the local authorities, and almost.
Speaker 1: All This is also a crime. So this trust that we,
Speaker 1: for some reason have in our authorities and government, these
Speaker 1: children are under their legal protection, whatever that means, because
Speaker 1: they're subjecting them to horrific testing. It's not testing, it's torture.
Speaker 3: All the children were believed to be African American or Latinos.
Speaker 4: Grossly misled us in terms of the numbers of children
Speaker 4: that were participating.
Speaker 1: That was a hot potato, passed the buck, that's what
Speaker 1: he did. Just now, how potato passed the buck they missed. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's shrugging your responsibility. Oh, they misled us. It's their fault. No,
Speaker 1: it's their fault. A little circle jerk all the way around
Speaker 1: the room.
Speaker 4: Being in these experiments.
Speaker 1: They originally looks like he really likes Stephen kitting. Those
Speaker 1: aren't you know really? Uh, it's like is that a library?
Speaker 1: Those aren't like loo kind of books of those? It's
Speaker 1: not reference material.
Speaker 4: Only said only seventy six. Last week they informed me
Speaker 4: that they were over four hundred and sixty five and
Speaker 4: could not even indicate as to whether there were That
Speaker 4: number was going to grow even larger.
Speaker 2: Age drugs tested on foster kids May four, two thousand
Speaker 2: and five. Government funded researchers tested AGE drugs on hundreds
Speaker 2: of foster children over the past two decades, often without
Speaker 2: providing them a basic protection afforded in federal law, and
Speaker 2: were acquired by some states.
Speaker 1: Just so you know, Stanford during I was streaming this
Speaker 1: on videos back in twenty twenty one, I believe it
Speaker 1: was when the information came out that Stanford was doing
Speaker 1: these vaccine tests on infants for the COVID and nobody
Speaker 1: seemed to have a fucking care in the world about
Speaker 1: that they were doing the same thing, same assholes involved
Speaker 1: and killed a bunch of children quietly.
Speaker 2: This time, research funded by the National Institutes of Health
Speaker 2: spanned the country. It was most widespread in the nineteen nineties,
Speaker 2: as foster care agencies sought treatments for their HIV infacted
Speaker 2: children that weren't yet available in the marketplace. The practice
Speaker 2: ensured that foster children, mostly poor or minority, received care
Speaker 2: from world class researchers at government offense, slowing their rate
Speaker 2: of death and extending their lives, but it also exposed
Speaker 2: the vulnerable population to the risk of medical research and
Speaker 2: drugs that were known to have serious side effects don't
Speaker 2: and it works to say they for children was unknown.
Speaker 5: These children, according to the ACS guidelines, didn't.
Speaker 1: Not now Here is Verra Sharov. Okay, my good friend
Speaker 1: that you know, Scott Shara Sharah, he knows her, they're friends.
Speaker 1: But here's the thing with her. You know, she might
Speaker 1: do good work, but is she just a lifetime actor?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, and maybe she's doing good work,
Speaker 1: maybe she did do good work, But here's the thing,
Speaker 1: and maybe at her age as a child, she really
Speaker 1: honestly believes that this is the truth because or she's
Speaker 1: protecting her tribe because she says that she narrowly escaped
Speaker 1: the Big Age, right, and if you would, I've been off.
Speaker 1: People have said you should get her on. Other people
Speaker 1: said I and get her for you, And I said,
Speaker 1: as long as she sits as long as when she
Speaker 1: sits down, and I explained to her in great detail
Speaker 1: that that shit never happened, and if she's cool with that,
Speaker 1: we can proceed. And I don't think that'll happen. Their
Speaker 1: whole entire identity is based around that fraud of that
Speaker 1: happened did not happen, but they claim happened in Germany.
Speaker 1: They can blame the Allies for that, and they're bombing
Speaker 1: for why people were starving. They can blame their own
Speaker 1: filthy ghettos for why they were covered in lice and
Speaker 1: stuff like that. And they can blame the Red Cross,
Speaker 1: by the Rothchilds run Red Cross for whatever injections they
Speaker 1: may have received while they were getting their quote unquote
Speaker 1: healthcare in those work not death but work camps.
Speaker 5: Not so much as have the dignity of individual consent
Speaker 5: on their behalf. They were herded like animals, some of
Speaker 5: the trials, some of the protocol say that.
Speaker 1: Oh, look you go using the word protocol.
Speaker 5: The children are and I quote presumed to be HIV positive. Now,
Speaker 5: kind of what kind of society are we that children
Speaker 5: who are only presumed and by whom are they presumed?
Speaker 5: What criteria makes them presumed to be HIV? That those
Speaker 5: children then get exposed to as many as seven highly
Speaker 5: toxic experimental drugs. These children were not in treatment, and
Speaker 5: ACS can't fudge that research and treatment are two very
Speaker 5: different things.
Speaker 1: The research was so really good points by Vera, and
Speaker 1: maybe she's a wonderful person, but I can't get over
Speaker 1: that story that she narrowly escaped as a child, And
Speaker 1: like I said, the adults around her may have given
Speaker 1: her that impression. And I can accept that if that's true.
Speaker 1: But it's just a matter of you know, having an
Speaker 1: actual and not an insulting one. But I would have to, like,
Speaker 1: at least, you know, show what I know and have
Speaker 1: a comp I don't know, if there's a that's the thing,
Speaker 1: I can have a commrational discussion about it. But whenever,
Speaker 1: when when someone's very identity is based on this thing
Speaker 1: that they've been saying and repeating to themselves their whole
Speaker 1: lives and the pressure around their little communities that you know,
Speaker 1: basically like their little call that you know, keeps everybody
Speaker 1: in lockstep saying the same things. There was I showed
Speaker 1: you that one guy for for like three thirty years,
Speaker 1: he was lying about being a survivor and meeting Joseph
Speaker 1: Mengela to keep the the spirit of the Holocaust alive
Speaker 1: in the minds of people by reminding people of it,
Speaker 1: even though he had nothing to do and was never there.
Speaker 1: The presumption, just like with medicine, that somehow there's valid
Speaker 1: to their statements.
Speaker 2: Conducted in nearly seven states Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, New York,
Speaker 2: North Carolina, Colorado, and Texas, and involved more than four
Speaker 2: dozen different studies. The foster children reigned from infants to
Speaker 2: late teens, according to interviews in government and records. Several
Speaker 2: studies that enlisted foster children reported patients suffered side effects
Speaker 2: such as rashes, vomiting, and sharp drops and infection fighting
Speaker 2: blood cells as they tested antiretroviral drugs to suppress AIDS
Speaker 2: or other medicines to treat secondary infections. In one study,
Speaker 2: researchers reported at quote disturbing higher death rate among children
Speaker 2: who took higher doses of a drug that study was
Speaker 2: unable to determine a safe and effective dose.
Speaker 5: All of those sort of things are not to be
Speaker 5: decided by bureaucrats who want to expedite simply the moment
Speaker 5: of children and couldn't care less as to what kind
Speaker 5: of experiments. I think it's very important to note that
Speaker 5: when ACS on their official documents refers to these as
Speaker 5: minimal risk, that's nonsense. These were Phase one and Phase
Speaker 5: two trials, which are the most experimental.
Speaker 2: The government provided special protections for child boards and ninet
Speaker 2: and three they required researchers and their oversight boards to
Speaker 2: appoint independent advocates for any falster child enrolled in the
Speaker 2: narrow class of studies that involve greater than minimal risk
Speaker 2: and lack the promise of direct benefit.
Speaker 1: Some posterrate lack the promise of direct benefits. This has
Speaker 1: been a practice for a long time to find children
Speaker 1: that don't have parents that can defend them and protect them,
Speaker 1: and then experiment on them a lot of what's going
Speaker 1: to happen soon. We collectively deserve for allowing this to
Speaker 1: go on.
Speaker 2: Agencies required to protection regardless of risks and benefits. Advocates
Speaker 2: must be independent that foster care and research agencies had
Speaker 2: some understanding of medical issues and quote Act and the
Speaker 2: best interest of the child for the entirety of the research.
Speaker 2: The law states. However, foster children AIDS drug trials often
Speaker 2: weren't given such advocates, even though research institutions many times
Speaker 2: promised to do so to gain access to the children.
Speaker 5: They had the children ready to go into trials before
Speaker 5: anyone even approved the specific the specific protocol. There is
Speaker 5: a very unseemly way in which these children were dealt.
Speaker 5: Their dignity, their humanity was just stripped. They were treated
Speaker 5: as numbers how old they were, from three months old on.
Speaker 2: Illinois officials believe none of their nearly two hundred foster
Speaker 2: children and AID studies got in the and IT monitors.
Speaker 2: Even though researchers signed a document guaranteeing quote the appointment
Speaker 2: of an advocate for each individual award.
Speaker 1: That's meaningless anyway, because the advocate is going to be
Speaker 1: working for the state. The advocate is going to be
Speaker 1: even if they're independent, it doesn't matter. They're gonna be
Speaker 1: pressured and they're going to find people who will follow
Speaker 1: and stand there just so that they could said they
Speaker 1: have an advocate in the room. Did this at the
Speaker 1: mortgage company, there's a guy that was to oversee all
Speaker 1: the documents and all this stuff like that. And unless
Speaker 1: you were egregiously stupid and you were trying to fudge
Speaker 1: documents or something like that, like I saw somebody do before.
Speaker 1: I don't know why you would try to mess with
Speaker 1: a W two, Like it's really easy to figure out
Speaker 1: whether or not that's a valid But somebody tried to
Speaker 1: do that. So he got in a little trouble because
Speaker 1: I would fall on the on the company, right. But
Speaker 1: you know they have these no no doc loans and
Speaker 1: what we call drug deal loans because stated income stated
Speaker 1: assets to get a mortgage refinance. So they had one
Speaker 1: of these advocates, but he was working for the company.
Speaker 1: All he was doing is protecting the company. He didn't
Speaker 1: if it went through and it passed and passed scrutiny,
Speaker 1: it didn't matter. It didn't matter if it was if
Speaker 1: it was fudged or not. They didn't care as long
Speaker 1: as they're making the money.
Speaker 2: Just beating in their respective medical research. New York city
Speaker 2: could find records showing one hundred and forty two, less
Speaker 2: than a third of the four hundred and sixty five
Speaker 2: foster children and eight drug trials got such monitors, even
Speaker 2: though city halls he required them. Likewise, research facilities including
Speaker 2: Chicago's Children's Memorial Hospital and John Hopkins University.
Speaker 1: And there it is again, John Hopkins University. We were
Speaker 1: talking about this yesterday. This is a den of vipers.
Speaker 1: This is an evil, wicked establishment.
Speaker 2: Baltimore said. They concluded they didn't provide advocates for foster kids.
Speaker 2: Some foster children died during studies, but state or city
Speaker 2: agencies said they could find no records that any deaths
Speaker 2: were directly by experimental treatments.
Speaker 1: Right, so they had presumed aids, but they just died
Speaker 1: because it wasn't because of the toxic overload that they
Speaker 1: were receiving every single day at mail nourishment guaranteed bail nourishment, of.
Speaker 2: Course they couldn't. Many of the studies that enrolled foster
Speaker 2: children occurred after nineteen ninety, when the government approved using
Speaker 2: the drug AZT for children. Arthur Caplan, head of medical
Speaker 2: ethics at the University of Pennsylvania, said advocates should have
Speaker 2: been appointed for all foster children because researchers felt the
Speaker 2: pressure of a medical crisis and knew there was great
Speaker 2: uncertainty as to how children would react to AIDS medications
Speaker 2: that were often toxic for adults. Quote it is exactly
Speaker 2: that set of circumstances that made it absolutely mandatory to
Speaker 2: get those kids those advocates, Caplin said, quote it is
Speaker 2: inexcusable that they wouldn't have any advocate for each one
Speaker 2: of those children. When you have the most vulnerable subjects
Speaker 2: imaginable kids without parents, you really do have to come
Speaker 2: in with someone independent who doesn't have a dog in
Speaker 2: this fight.
Speaker 1: He said.
Speaker 2: Quote I understand the ethical dilemma surrounding the introduction of
Speaker 2: foster children into trials, said doctor Mark Klein, a pediatric
Speaker 2: AIDS expert at Baylor College of Medicine.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that last name is suspicious to me already.
Speaker 2: He enrolled some Texas foster kids and his studies and
Speaker 2: he doesn't recall appointing advocates for them. AP's review found
Speaker 2: that if children were old enough, usually between five and ten,
Speaker 2: they also were educated about the risks and asked to consent.
Speaker 2: Sometimes foster parents or biological parents were consulted other times not.
Speaker 2: Researchers reported some children had to be taken off the
Speaker 2: drug because of quote serious toxicity. Others developed rashes, and
Speaker 2: the rates of death and blood toxicity were significantly higher,
Speaker 2: and children who took the medicine daily rather than weekly.
Speaker 2: At least ten children died from a variety of causes,
Speaker 2: including four from blood poisoning, and researchers said they were
Speaker 2: unable to determine a safe, useful dosage. They said the
Speaker 2: death didn't appear to be quote directly attributable to dapt zone,
Speaker 2: which I guess is one of the drugs, but nonetheless
Speaker 2: they were quote disturbing quote. An unexpected finding in our
Speaker 2: study was at overall mortality while receiving the study drug
Speaker 2: was significantly higher in the daily dapt zone group. This
Speaker 2: finding remains unexplained. Another study involving foster children in the
Speaker 2: nineteen nineties treated children with difficult combinations of adult anti
Speaker 2: retroviral drugs. Among fifty two children, there were twenty six
Speaker 2: moderate to severe reactions, nearly all in infants. The side
Speaker 2: effects included rash, fever, and major drop in infection fighting
Speaker 2: white blood cells.
Speaker 1: All could be caused by highly toxic antibiotics AZT medicine,
Speaker 1: which isn't medicine. That's a chemotherapy drug that was too
Speaker 1: dangerous in the sixties to be used. High fatalities, right,
Speaker 1: this is what they call cytotoxic drugs, killing cells, cytotoxic
Speaker 1: cell death.
Speaker 2: Research and foster agencies decline to make foster parents or
Speaker 2: children in the drug trials available for interviews or to
Speaker 2: provide information about individual drug doses, side effects, or deaths,
Speaker 2: citing medical privacy laws.
Speaker 4: There seems to be some quote.
Speaker 1: See how the invert the law? Is there sod of
Speaker 1: protecting them by saying they're protecting their privacy to protecting
Speaker 1: themselves from having to be accountable.
Speaker 4: Cover up type activity that's taken place that needs to
Speaker 4: be looked into.
Speaker 2: Oh, by the way, thank you to whoever pointed this
Speaker 2: out to me. Evaluating the scale, growth and origins of
Speaker 2: right wing echo chambers on YouTube by a bunch of
Speaker 2: people including David M. Rothschild and a bunch of voices
Speaker 2: including the Department of Statistics, Harvard University and Microsoft Research
Speaker 2: New York and New England. Anyway, I'm not right wing,
Speaker 2: I'm not left.
Speaker 1: Wing anyway, now he's just babbling. So there's that. But yeah,
Speaker 1: those are your overlords of YouTube, is basically what he's
Speaker 1: getting out there. Rothschild pops up again, surprise, surprise. And
Speaker 1: David was probably named after David Rockefeller because they have
Speaker 1: a boner for that family too, just like that whole
Speaker 1: uh oh, Adam Schiff, He's gonna get it when Trump
Speaker 1: comes in. Adam Shift is protected on high by the
Speaker 1: Prince of Darkness. He's Jacob Shift's descendant. He could murder
Speaker 1: a baby in front of live television and nothing would
Speaker 1: happen to him. This is the reality. Oh and to
Speaker 1: go along with the thumbnail, I meant to say, I
Speaker 1: meant to play this earlier.
Speaker 5: Gosh h.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I know it's not it's not the best,
Speaker 1: but I mean, this is what we have to deal
Speaker 1: with because we have to get back into the reality
Speaker 1: of the situation otherwise too many some of these are funny.
Speaker 1: It says it's clear that the rock Fellers take over
Speaker 1: of the in the early twentieth century was just one
Speaker 1: major front of attack on the human population. Yeah, so
Speaker 1: I'll read the rest of the first It all makes
Speaker 1: sense when we realize they're trying to kill us. Yes,
Speaker 1: here's the other thing too. The I can point this
Speaker 1: isn't specified or pointed out in the book virus Mania,
Speaker 1: but when they talk about okay, are there other factors?
Speaker 1: Are their potential chemical factors involved in quote unquote outbreaks
Speaker 1: of what they're you know, the mystery microbe, the phantom
Speaker 1: unicorn and virus And sure enough every single time. And
Speaker 1: it's not just DDT, but all types of pesticides were
Speaker 1: dumped on the food supply between the first and second
Speaker 1: World War and heavily after the third. After the second, well,
Speaker 1: the third is comment don't worry, it's written around the corner.
Speaker 1: And this whole thing, this whole build up, you know,
Speaker 1: how they've been utilizing, probably for the last decades worth
Speaker 1: of rabid rabbi clips on Instagram and everyplace else to
Speaker 1: show you what they really think, and how Adam Green
Speaker 1: seems to be like grabbing all these and putting it
Speaker 1: together in the sky conspiracy, whatever the heck his name is,
Speaker 1: does this too, and he also posts a bunch of
Speaker 1: Adam Green stuff, this whole build up of this, like,
Speaker 1: you know, very blatant. This is what we're doing, and
Speaker 1: then we're doing it to you. And you know us
Speaker 1: to be destroyed, amleak, and you must be disturbed he's
Speaker 1: and all this other stuff. They did this during World
Speaker 1: War one and two, right they were the Zionist movement
Speaker 1: was screaming aloud exactly what their intentions were, and yet
Speaker 1: they still got their their state right, they still got
Speaker 1: their Balfour Declaration. Because this isn't in our control. The
Speaker 1: people who have already taken over are going to run
Speaker 1: things however they're can run them unless that particular aspect
Speaker 1: of our country has resolved and changed. There's nothing that
Speaker 1: we personally are going to stop. They're going to do it.
Speaker 1: We can react to it, defend it, and maybe prevent
Speaker 1: it at that level, but not as it's happening. So
Speaker 1: you know, many many armies in one hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: three member states of the United Nations, and all of
Speaker 1: them at the behest of one central bank, psychopathic child
Speaker 1: killing Frankist Zionist family and the Roman Catholic Empire, who's
Speaker 1: already through three papal bulls, decided that they own the
Speaker 1: entire world, everything on it, and your souls and every person.
Speaker 1: They own you, your property, and that's reflected rate in
Speaker 1: our certificate, light birth and pir certificate and all that
Speaker 1: too are collateral, So that's fun stuff to talk about.
Speaker 1: Nick just sent me this. It looks pretty cool. I'm
Speaker 1: a big fan of vans and recreational vehicles or whatever
Speaker 1: you call them a so apparently that one's close to
Speaker 1: three hundred grand. I don't know if it's worth all
Speaker 1: that unless it's bulletproof. But I mean just getting an old,
Speaker 1: older ETE fifty because if this has a bunch of
Speaker 1: computers on it, then it's worthless because if it can
Speaker 1: be remotely shut off on you, then what is the point.
Speaker 1: But it looks pretty cool. Not gonna lie. I would
Speaker 1: have to get in an FTE for to match the
Speaker 1: background here. That's a little bit off color for a
Speaker 1: green grassy plane unless he's waiting for winter or something.
Speaker 1: Doesn't exactly blend. But very cool looking. So now the
Speaker 1: new so now, so now the new the new? Uh
Speaker 1: the new campaign fun goal is two hundred k No,
Speaker 1: but like I said before, we are at four point
Speaker 1: fifty left for the goal for the computer, so we're
Speaker 1: getting close. And like I and like I also said
Speaker 1: that may or may not cover the software that I
Speaker 1: needed to do the editing so that would be another
Speaker 1: three on top of that. So if if more comes in,
Speaker 1: then great. If if we just hit the goal, awesome too,
Speaker 1: because at least I'll get the components together to go
Speaker 1: about to the other part later. But let's show you
Speaker 1: I'm away, am I even honestly? Nope, I just have
Speaker 1: to get into it. So you saw the little thermometer
Speaker 1: right all right, that's uh, it's about where we're at.
Speaker 1: So that's very very good, very good. So right here,
Speaker 1: hit the show more and I would highly this also
Speaker 1: helps the show too. It's not really for the computer fund,
Speaker 1: but I can use it to make up the difference.
Speaker 1: I accidentally didn't realize that I had used the three
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety one dollars of the fund, so I
Speaker 1: put back four hundred into that fund from my other
Speaker 1: account so that it balanced out what I had. Actually
Speaker 1: I had been I had done a transfer for somebody
Speaker 1: at the banks, like you have all this and blah
Speaker 1: blah blah, do you want to move it? I'm like, yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: Not thinking about where it was coming from, I was like,
Speaker 1: ah shit, I got put it back, so yeah, it's
Speaker 1: all stabilized now. So anyway, leaving FUM behind right here,
Speaker 1: doctor Peter Glidden ball busters fifty percent off. I highly
Speaker 1: recommend getting onto this because the more I piece this
Speaker 1: stuff together and connect these dots, the more vital and
Speaker 1: absolutely confirmed. And I do this, but the consistent confirmation
Speaker 1: of doctor Monzo and doctor Glidden and their emphasis on
Speaker 1: the only way that you prevent and fix problems is
Speaker 1: not with drugs. It's not with going to the MD
Speaker 1: unless it's surgical and it's necessary, and even then they
Speaker 1: things up. It's all about the nutrition, and there's so
Speaker 1: many lies about the nutritional aspects. There's so many things
Speaker 1: that you would never even think of because it's counterintuitive
Speaker 1: to how we've been programmed, and it's all laid out
Speaker 1: for you on doctor Glidden's site. And then there's those
Speaker 1: two other options. You have to ask him your questions
Speaker 1: if it's not something that's already on his site specific
Speaker 1: to you, and he goes through just like he would like,
Speaker 1: not a three hour consultation. But if you explain, you know,
Speaker 1: I correctly in your question, like it's a pain in
Speaker 1: the in my right temple or whatever, and I'm also
Speaker 1: feverish and my mouth is dry or whatever whatever, right, well,
Speaker 1: then he'll put those together and be like get and
Speaker 1: he'll tell you the homeopathic to go with, also taking
Speaker 1: your you know, your your nutritional necessities. So it's a
Speaker 1: it's a vital, vital thing, and it'll save you a
Speaker 1: whole lot of time and money, especially in medical insurance.
Speaker 1: All right, this is a this is how you should
Speaker 1: roll with it. But also here, so I said, he everyone,
Speaker 1: I'm raising funds to build a video editing and streaming computer.
Speaker 1: This one I have as honest last days, and I
Speaker 1: don't want the channel to end when it completely goes out.
Speaker 1: You are the change, you are the sponsors. We are,
Speaker 1: I said, only five hundred away from the goal because
Speaker 1: I wasn't sure exactly how much we're going to need,
Speaker 1: and then they take their cuts and all that, but
Speaker 1: the four fifty is probably about more accurate. And then
Speaker 1: there's Gibson goo dot com which is right here, and Colleen,
Speaker 1: thank you, Bager Deabella you know I thank you guys
Speaker 1: every time. Kevin and Kevin your stuffs on the way. Rebecca.
Speaker 1: It's going to be packaging it today. So there you
Speaker 1: have it. Once I get the itemized list, i'll post
Speaker 1: it in one of the updates or add it to
Speaker 1: I guess I could add to this, but this is
Speaker 1: already kind of long. Some people would have to scroll.
Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about the next upcoming book here,
Speaker 1: which I will be starting once I get all this
Speaker 1: other Hot Sauce work done. I got a bunch of
Speaker 1: orders and that was cool, so I'm working on that.
Speaker 1: If you knew my overhead multi bills here fare As activities,
Speaker 1: you would understand that the fund is absolutely necessary because
Speaker 1: there's nothing left over at the end. I send that
Speaker 1: huge wholesale order to San Diego and that pays the
Speaker 1: rent and maybe sometimes some of the utilities. So yeah,
Speaker 1: there's that. I'm not sure if if TG media is
Speaker 1: online today. The last two videos I try to do.
Speaker 1: The one over the weekend was well, the one on
Speaker 1: Tuesday didn't work. It was a broken file. And then
Speaker 1: yesterday when I broadcast with Diego Garcia know Dwayne right
Speaker 1: from bulletproofpub dot com, that one never even appeared over there.
Speaker 1: I know they're working on server to things today, but
Speaker 1: I post it up as if I was on there.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if that's even happening. If it doesn't stick,
Speaker 1: then I'll just upload it again later, like I did
Speaker 1: with the I already did the bulletproof pub one, so
Speaker 1: it's up there now, but the site will be down
Speaker 1: for a little bit today because they're doing some upgrades
Speaker 1: or updates or something like that. So I highly recommend
Speaker 1: getting over there. Though my mouth is really dry. I'm
Speaker 1: just contemplating if I really want to start reading this
Speaker 1: or not. Yeah, let's go for it. I have a
Speaker 1: little time before the place opens. I have to go
Speaker 1: get the water drugs field. Oh and by the way,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of there's a lot of chatter out there,
Speaker 1: a lot of chatter. Some of it might be concerning
Speaker 1: we kind of talked about the U N thing already.
Speaker 1: But here, I'll play this video and I don't know
Speaker 1: that I do not have to add the sound because
Speaker 1: it already comes through with telegrams, so it should simply enough,
Speaker 1: just not be doubled, not beet good if I just
Speaker 1: played like this. So let's see what happens. You tell
Speaker 1: me if you hear it. And now, okay, so I
Speaker 1: know if this is accurate, what.
Speaker 6: Happens if our seaports go on strike. The strike is
Speaker 6: set for October first, so you better share this with
Speaker 6: everyone because if our ports close everything.
Speaker 1: And somebody at this point he said, what how is
Speaker 1: this different than the last time they went on strike.
Speaker 1: I wasn't aware that that has happened in the past.
Speaker 1: I guess it does periodically, just like every other union, right,
Speaker 1: But I hated the ib W. It was a Marxist
Speaker 1: Communist thing. It wasn't so bad. I mean, the halls
Speaker 1: are always bad. I mean you have to go to
Speaker 1: hall meetings, but you know, working on the job site,
Speaker 1: they were very helpful teaching me stuff as I was
Speaker 1: going through my first year in the local two thirty
Speaker 1: six in Albany and New York Albany Schenecty. So those
Speaker 1: guys were cool, and I got to work a couple
Speaker 1: of different times at the original Edison General Electric and
Speaker 1: the big ge sign with all the light bulbs. We
Speaker 1: changed those, put in the little lot tight on there,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, the stuff that makes us
Speaker 1: so it doesn't you know, get stuck. Well, we changed
Speaker 1: all the bulbs in that it's an old old time sign.
Speaker 1: And then I ended up working at the battery plant.
Speaker 1: They were I think the Lithian batteries or something like that,
Speaker 1: so we were working right alongside some German contractors too.
Speaker 1: It was kind of cool to listen to them talk.
Speaker 6: We depend on closes with it. Let's talk about what
Speaker 6: would happen within the month of October. On day one,
Speaker 6: international fuel shipments are the first to feel the impact.
Speaker 6: Crude oil tankers stuck offshore means no new fuel entering
Speaker 6: refineries by the end of the day. Concerns spread across
Speaker 6: the industries.
Speaker 1: Here's the thing about that too, because of the EPA
Speaker 1: BS that is, you know, limiting, they don't they're not
Speaker 1: allowed to build any new refineries, and they're already working
Speaker 1: at a one hundred percent capacity. They're supposed to be like
Speaker 1: at fifty or sixty, and you know, there's supposed to
Speaker 1: be maintenance being done on one side and then they
Speaker 1: swap right, But because they're not allowed to make more,
Speaker 1: they're always working at one hundred percent capacity. So there's
Speaker 1: that to consider and whether or not, you know, if
Speaker 1: a certain percentage of what we need does come from elsewhere,
Speaker 1: because you know, they've sabotaged pipelines and stuff like that
Speaker 1: here ended them, then we're still gonna be in a deficit.
Speaker 1: Right now. The gas prices are the lowest I've seen
Speaker 1: in a while. Which I guess, and I made this
Speaker 1: comment on my Telegram group as I was driving home
Speaker 1: last night, so I was looking at the gas prices.
Speaker 1: I was like, am I a pessimist for thinking that
Speaker 1: we're being pacified right now with low gas prices? Because
Speaker 1: something very terrible is about to happen.
Speaker 6: Gas stations, trucking companies, and airlines braced for them imediate shortages.
Speaker 6: Everything from fuel to imported goods is at risk, but
Speaker 6: fuel becomes the most critical loss. By day three, gas
Speaker 6: stations are starting to run dry and rationing begins.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's going to happen that quickly.
Speaker 6: Prices served as demand skyrockets. Without fuel, trucks can't deliver goods,
Speaker 6: and the first shortages show up in grocery stores. Businesses
Speaker 6: relying on imported oil, like refineries, scramble to maintain operations
Speaker 6: with whatever deserves they have left. The ripple effect starts
Speaker 6: to hit home. No fuel means no transportation, and without transportation,
Speaker 6: the flow of goods stock day seven, the energy crisis
Speaker 6: takes hold. Within the first week, the impact of fuel
Speaker 6: shortage deepens. Trucks, trains, and ships that move es central
Speaker 6: supplies across the country slow to a halt. Agriculture and
Speaker 6: manufacturing are crippled, unable to operate without fuel for machinery
Speaker 6: and transportation.
Speaker 1: So what are we talking about? We talking about longshoremen
Speaker 1: here that are going on on strike. How hard is
Speaker 1: it to get a get it? Do you call a
Speaker 1: rat crew in there, as they call them non unions
Speaker 1: to uh fill in the gap, or or anybody else
Speaker 1: for that matter, pull them out of a retirement. Bernie
Speaker 1: Madoff already destroyed their pension, so I mean, I'm sure
Speaker 1: they'll be happy to get into work again.
Speaker 6: Airlines begin canceling fights and public transportation services are cut.
Speaker 6: Gas prices hit all time highs as panic buying intensifies.
Speaker 6: By week two, the Power Great struggles and collapse looms.
Speaker 6: Power Bay plants that rely on imported fuel start to
Speaker 6: struggle on blackout spread as they ration what's left. People
Speaker 6: begin hoarding fuel, and chaos erupts at the pumps. The
Speaker 6: stock market plummets as industries rely on global supply chain.
Speaker 1: And while you're worrying about that, some Mahitian runs by
Speaker 1: and chops your head off with the machete and rape
Speaker 1: your cat. And they need to.
Speaker 6: Begin to crumble, the economy falters, and unemployment skyrockets. This
Speaker 6: factories close and business is shutter by week four, total
Speaker 6: breakdown of society by the end of the month. The
Speaker 6: energy crisis and fuel shortages brings society to its knees.
Speaker 6: Cities erupt into fuel rise, and law enforcement is overwhelmed
Speaker 6: with no fuel.
Speaker 1: That's assuming that law enforcement's there to do anything positive. Dude,
Speaker 1: you're a little naive.
Speaker 6: Food distribution collapses and starvation becomes a real threat. Communities
Speaker 6: are left to fend for themselves as fuel reserves dry
Speaker 6: up completely, leaving transportation.
Speaker 1: If communities are brought together and it takes something like
Speaker 1: a crisis for it to happen, I say bring it on,
Speaker 1: because it's about fucking time we learn how to work together.
Speaker 6: Emergency services and the economy and ruins without ports. Crude
Speaker 6: oil can't get in without crude oil. Fuel can't be
Speaker 6: made without fuel. Everything grinds to a halt when the
Speaker 6: fuel stops.
Speaker 1: But don't worry, if you're illegal, you'll still have your
Speaker 1: un money. Because they want to drain us dry in
Speaker 1: the process so that they could take our property and
Speaker 1: foreclosure and all this other stuff. So not to worry.
Speaker 1: Not to worry. If you're if you don't belong here,
Speaker 1: then you're gonna be just fine. You're still gonna get
Speaker 1: your your bank card all filled up. You might not
Speaker 1: have food, but hey, you already know how to find
Speaker 1: ducks and cats, so you should be good.
Speaker 6: America stops and just so we're clear, this could all
Speaker 6: happen within the month of October apl.
Speaker 1: So with that, I'm glad he mentioned the whole October
Speaker 1: thing because I have something else to say here if
Speaker 1: I can find it, hopefully I didn't pass it already.
Speaker 1: It was shared a couple of times ship or scramble
Speaker 1: for workarounds ahead of looming US East Coast port strike.
Speaker 1: So there's that article there from Routers Routers. Obviously uh
Speaker 1: Roth's child owned. It's not conjecture, that's what it is.
Speaker 1: Where did I see this hold on? I gotta go
Speaker 1: look for it now. Nothing's ever closed by Oh I went.
Speaker 1: I'll go into the details about the raw milk too.
Speaker 1: People might be interested in that. There's a there's a
Speaker 1: site that you can go state by state to see
Speaker 1: whether it's legal and what the restrictions are. So let
Speaker 1: me go find this other thing. Though, it's a schedule.
Speaker 1: Just in case we didn't already look at this. This
Speaker 1: is out of order. Okay, here it is just open,
Speaker 1: open with just fucking open it. So congressional calendar. And
Speaker 1: you see there there's Senate only, session, House only session
Speaker 1: color coded here right, both chambers in session is yellow,
Speaker 1: Senate is blue, Houses red. And then look at October.
Speaker 1: And then people were saying that they have confirmed that
Speaker 1: this is legitimate, like this is a legitimate calendar, and
Speaker 1: that they have never taken a whole month off before
Speaker 1: and not in October. I would say even more suspicious
Speaker 1: that it's an election year. Why when they have stuff
Speaker 1: to do? But hey, Rashashana, they have that off. They
Speaker 1: got Halloween. You know, that's a big day for them
Speaker 1: in Columbus. Yum kapoor, the chicken, the chicken, chokers, chicken swingers,
Speaker 1: h days of atonement right where you can curse another
Speaker 1: living creature and then kill it and then feed it
Speaker 1: to poor people, and somehow that's not predatorial behavior because
Speaker 1: now you have cursed meat going to someone else who
Speaker 1: you know, it's okay if you've raped babies, as long
Speaker 1: as you're of a certain chosen people. Because at the
Speaker 1: end of the year or in October every year, you
Speaker 1: can just go ahead and shrug your responsibilities in your
Speaker 1: accountability and any consequences for your actions by giving it,
Speaker 1: passing it on to something else, some other living entity.
Speaker 1: And don't think that that's just for chickens. I'm sure
Speaker 1: in dark rooms potentially with red stained mattresses, there's other
Speaker 1: types of swinging going on, and other types of there
Speaker 1: it is right there, and other types of sacrifices, and
Speaker 1: probably eating and drinking that too, because they're weird and
Speaker 1: very evil. Making sure you can see it. Okay, good kay.
Speaker 1: Put my head's in the one, No on, my head's
Speaker 1: on the side. So there it is. It's empty. And
Speaker 1: I made this statement. I'll know where I said it.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I need to go into it
Speaker 1: or not. Somebody replied to that one.
Speaker 4: They know.
Speaker 1: That's the first time I got dropped in, I think.
Speaker 1: So anyhow, with all that going on, I think I
Speaker 1: said this to you guys yesterday. Actually, you know, wouldn't
Speaker 1: it be funny giving this whole bringing it to the
Speaker 1: tension of the public mind again, this whole deep fake
Speaker 1: thing because they wanted, just like they did the last elections. Oh,
Speaker 1: watch off of the deep fikes, even going so far
Speaker 1: with Gavin Newsom being absolutely retarded, just to test the
Speaker 1: waters and how retarded they can be without people fighting
Speaker 1: it back. He says, my past miss thoughts as well.
Speaker 1: But what if they've already recorded a whole bunch of
Speaker 1: stuff so it appears like they're above the surface with us,
Speaker 1: But in all reality, those who that they decided they
Speaker 1: were going to keep because they're useful are deep underground
Speaker 1: somewhere because something that they know is about to happen
Speaker 1: is about to happen, and that's why their schedule is cleared.
Speaker 1: But you would think they would shows things out a
Speaker 1: schedule if they wanted to pull that off, right, I
Speaker 1: don't know they have things on for the month after that,
Speaker 1: So I don't understand why all of October there's no session.
Speaker 1: I'm sure there could be a rational explanation for that,
Speaker 1: but if it's never happened in the past, and if
Speaker 1: it's even less likely that would happen during an election
Speaker 1: year that close to November, so once that mean they
Speaker 1: come back for there was no work to do until
Speaker 1: four days before the election. Doesn't make a lot of sense,
Speaker 1: doesn't make a lot of sense. And then also you
Speaker 1: can go look this up. We're going to have another
Speaker 1: moon soon. Is that related to potential? I don't know.
Speaker 1: Tug and pull. If we believe in how waves are made,
Speaker 1: is it going to be another another large body that
Speaker 1: can actually exert some sort of gravitational poll on us?
Speaker 1: Is that gonna screw things up? Is it gonna finally
Speaker 1: alter our very fragile and already starting to shift pullar
Speaker 1: polarity of our, of our you know, magnetic poles. Is
Speaker 1: this gonna be somehow related to not neighbor but maybe,
Speaker 1: but also like the the Chan Thomas book, the Anam
Speaker 1: and Nave story, where these cyclical cataclysms come by and
Speaker 1: it's actually like there's a frozen layer that somehow melts
Speaker 1: and shifts or whatever. So just the crust layer moves
Speaker 1: like the core if we believe in the ball model,
Speaker 1: if we don't, whatever I'm just saying, and then it
Speaker 1: could spin rapidly and just throw everything basically to a wall.
Speaker 1: It's flat, And they found clusters of fossilized decay a
Speaker 1: matter with tropical you know, plants in their mouths still
Speaker 1: in a frozen tundra and It's like, because why because
Speaker 1: the earth changed or because the this positioning of the
Speaker 1: crust moved and put places that were once frozen in
Speaker 1: a tropical area, you know, closer to the equator. You
Speaker 1: see what I'm saying here, and then places that were
Speaker 1: once frozen or now not. And then you know, you
Speaker 1: can look at the Sahara allegedly being a you know,
Speaker 1: giant lake. At one point there was plenty of water
Speaker 1: in Egypt. There's erosion lines, things to think about. Speculation
Speaker 1: could be fun as long as it doesn't end up
Speaker 1: being true. That's when it starts to suck. All right,
Speaker 1: there was something else in here, but I don't know
Speaker 1: if I'm gonna Oh, yeah, we went over the whole
Speaker 1: stupid nonsense about Donald Trump. He had the big threats
Speaker 1: on my life by Iran. Yeah, because Iran is the
Speaker 1: one he wants to go to war with. So now
Speaker 1: it's all around. It's all just putting the seeds in
Speaker 1: the heads of the minds of people. They need to
Speaker 1: manipulate and steer their opinion. Apparently, who is this, who
Speaker 1: is this? Who is this? Who is that?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: Alex, Alex said Boeing on strike Already, Lockey just added
Speaker 1: a huge building and a large fence around the whole
Speaker 1: facility at King of Prussia Mall. I bet there's going
Speaker 1: to be some trumpets in the sky in that area,
Speaker 1: if there aren't already. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, Okay, I
Speaker 1: guess I'll read now just a little bit, but I
Speaker 1: gotta get out of here and get stuff done. Yeah,
Speaker 1: send me cool stuff a lot, so thank you. Yeah
Speaker 1: for those of you who contribute, either sending me stuff
Speaker 1: on Instagram, sending me stuff like you know my email address.
Speaker 1: If you want to send me stuff here, let's go
Speaker 1: to the banners. So it's Ballbusters at outlook dot com.
Speaker 1: If you ever have a story of link or something
Speaker 1: like that you want me to look at, you can
Speaker 1: send it to me there, or you can just get
Speaker 1: into the telegram group, which is t do me backslash
Speaker 1: capital letter for each word, but it's obviously all strung together,
Speaker 1: no spaces, Ballbusters Studios. For as long as that lasts,
Speaker 1: I might change. I might have to swap this over
Speaker 1: to Bradian dot social or Bridion dot io at some point,
Speaker 1: because we've heard what every hell's name is? Is it Pavlov?
Speaker 1: What the hell is his last name? The guy from
Speaker 1: the guy from a telegram who got detained and arrested,
Speaker 1: caved in, given the FBI backdoor to hand everything over
Speaker 1: on a silver brider. And you know how they don't
Speaker 1: like you talking badly about the protected class of chosen ones,
Speaker 1: self elected chosen ones. I could just say I'm chosen, right,
Speaker 1: if any I identify as a chosen person, how about
Speaker 1: that it's not particularly the ones that, not particularly their group.
Speaker 1: I'm just chosen, you see, I chose to choose myself.
Speaker 1: Sounds like a rush song. Now, all right, let's get
Speaker 1: into a little bit of this. Let's do it. Then
Speaker 1: I gotta get out here. Virus mania. I want to
Speaker 1: get to the even flu section, so I might skip
Speaker 1: around a little. I'm not saying that there's not anything important,
Speaker 1: but establishing the pattern of what they're saying, and then
Speaker 1: adding what I've gathered from other books, like Dissolving Illusions
Speaker 1: talking about the industrial pollution, and you know, the toxic water.
Speaker 1: We discussed that a little bit too, the stench of it,
Speaker 1: the fecal matter in it, the urine, the industrial chemicals.
Speaker 1: People were drinking this and getting sick, and then oh
Speaker 1: my god, it's smallpox. Virus rights all cover ups for
Speaker 1: their own contamination, all cover ups for their own medical mishaps,
Speaker 1: but deliberate eugenics program to weed out the population by
Speaker 1: slow torture and poisonous drugs. What's we were in and
Speaker 1: I got changed up? There we go. Let me see
Speaker 1: what the comment says, Pavel, Yeah, Pavlo, you know, more
Speaker 1: like that somebody rang a bell and he started salvating.
Speaker 1: All right. So children were suffering horridly from the side
Speaker 1: effects that the drugs tested on them. This is going
Speaker 1: back to what we were talking about with the first
Speaker 1: video that we watched, according to journalist Liam Chef, who
Speaker 1: broke the story in early two thousand and four on
Speaker 1: an alternative website, and children who didn't want the substances
Speaker 1: were even forced to take them. For this, plastic tubes
Speaker 1: were sown through the abdominal wall by surgeons through which
Speaker 1: the substances can directly can be directly injected in the stomach.
Speaker 1: Here's the thing. Once they get that positive test, they
Speaker 1: regardless of you feel ill or not, they were strong
Speaker 1: arming people. Now I'm not talking about the children here,
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the general population. Strong army people and
Speaker 1: the starting to take these drugs. They didn't say, okay, well,
Speaker 1: your immune system seems to be a little weak here. No,
Speaker 1: because they already had their antibioty test. So it's a
Speaker 1: virus and the only way to fight a virus is
Speaker 1: to kill you in the process. Sure, but did they
Speaker 1: check their nutrition? Did they check any other environmental factors
Speaker 1: they check to see if there's any contaminations. Did they
Speaker 1: check to see any of that. No, of course not,
Speaker 1: because they're single minded on this idea. It's not and
Speaker 1: they can't be this stupid and blind unless it's on purpose.
Speaker 1: And at the higher levels that is exactly true. And
Speaker 1: then there's too much stake in the game because if
Speaker 1: they can come up with a new thing, there's so
Speaker 1: much more money to be made for the people that
Speaker 1: are the lower levels. The top people just want the
Speaker 1: human suffering. They don't they print the money. It doesn't
Speaker 1: mean anything to them. But the people who are looking
Speaker 1: for clout, looking to have their name in a book
Speaker 1: for having discovered something new looking to you know, create
Speaker 1: a new poisonous drug to administer to people. They're all
Speaker 1: either clout chasing, looking for recognition, or playing preventative loss
Speaker 1: of monetary gain by not looking at anything else and
Speaker 1: not trying to just strengthen the human body so that
Speaker 1: it can fix itself. And this is why doctor Glynnon's
Speaker 1: information is so freaking important because you can say it,
Speaker 1: you can hear it, you can yeah, yeah, but until
Speaker 1: you start seeing just how deeply disturbing and how deeply
Speaker 1: entrench this stuff is and understand just how absolutely valid
Speaker 1: it verified and true. What doctor Glynnon says in contrast
Speaker 1: to this, that we're looking at this all wrong. You
Speaker 1: don't go after thing inside you. You just make yourself
Speaker 1: stronger and then you, yourself will be able to, through
Speaker 1: your bodies innate intelligence, fix most of the problems. And
Speaker 1: then if you need a little tweaking, there's the homeopathic remedies.
Speaker 1: But you start by building up your nutritional needs. And
Speaker 1: why are people able to go deficient for a long time, Well,
Speaker 1: they're not because they don't live healthy lives. When they
Speaker 1: get older, things start to break down. They might not
Speaker 1: associate that. Originally I had a bone break in my
Speaker 1: fist by when I was punching something. And this is
Speaker 1: a long time ago. This was this risk, the one
Speaker 1: that sell jacked up, and it was brittle, and then
Speaker 1: I find out the kidney thing. I must have probably
Speaker 1: had something going on at that point, because it didn't
Speaker 1: make sense I had broken the toe just running to
Speaker 1: catch a frisbee. I felt like I stepped into like
Speaker 1: a sand pit and it broke. And then they also
Speaker 1: told me I had two weeks worth of of healing,
Speaker 1: because they don't know anything that they're talking about when
Speaker 1: I went in there like two days later. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: have two weeks worth of healing anyway, So let's see
Speaker 1: for this, plastic tubes are selling dealble synaasens through which
Speaker 1: the substance could be directly injected into the stomach. So
Speaker 1: when they were being when they were went and take
Speaker 1: their drugs, they were forcing them to take them, and
Speaker 1: they're doing it through a surgical procedure directly into the stomach.
Speaker 1: The result and by the way, anything that's injected into
Speaker 1: you is trying to bypass your own digestive system. They
Speaker 1: don't want it broken down. Well, then that's not natural
Speaker 1: and it should never be done ever. Ever, nothing I would.
Speaker 1: I don't even like the idea. And there's absolutely no
Speaker 1: use if you read murder by injection for any type
Speaker 1: of just you know, an ivy with a saline solution bag.
Speaker 1: What is the point if you're super dehydrated like that,
Speaker 1: you got other issues going on, there's no reason for
Speaker 1: them to stick anything into you that they can while
Speaker 1: you're sleeping, and once they've sedated, you stick another needle
Speaker 1: in there and shoot something else down in It just
Speaker 1: makes it convenient because you don't feel it all right.
Speaker 1: The result brain and bone marrow damage, which could probably
Speaker 1: lead to leukemia I'm imagining on the bone marrow part, blindness, strokes,
Speaker 1: and some children also died, according to Chef. Then Post
Speaker 1: seized upon the story and ran the headline AIDS tots
Speaker 1: used as guinea pigs, a term which the BBC also
Speaker 1: used for their television documentary Guinea Pig Kids two thousand
Speaker 1: and five. And official investigation ultimately came to the conclusion
Speaker 1: that government funded researchers who tested AIDS drugs on fostered
Speaker 1: children over the past two decades, two decades, twenty years
Speaker 1: of this shit violated federal rules designed to protect vulnerable youths,
Speaker 1: the two youths. This finally prompted the New York Times,
Speaker 1: which is otherwise always the first on the scene on
Speaker 1: the subject of HIV AIDS, to take up the highly
Speaker 1: explosive topic as well with a decidedly different spin. Now
Speaker 1: here's the discussing spin doctors here right, the people who
Speaker 1: who play Uh, what's up? What am I trying to
Speaker 1: say here? Preventative measure? I don't know what I'm trying
Speaker 1: to say. In an article, two Predetritions were quoted as
Speaker 1: saying that to have withheld promising this is it? This matter,
Speaker 1: I said this, this is going to come up. To
Speaker 1: have withheld promising drugs from six children just because they
Speaker 1: were in foster care would have been inhumane. How convoluted
Speaker 1: is that statement? They weren't ill, some of money of
Speaker 1: them were not ill. But they're completely fantastical, imaginary, whatever
Speaker 1: the hell they think that the PCR test is telling them,
Speaker 1: because they don't even know what they're looking for. They
Speaker 1: just see a common alien threebody. Oh, so that positive
Speaker 1: doesn't mean anything. They weren't sick at the time, but
Speaker 1: they were killed by these freaking drugs. But what they'll
Speaker 1: say against their own will, as they had mentioned, or
Speaker 1: the infants who have absolute no idea what's going on
Speaker 1: to them, And that's a horrible thing that they could
Speaker 1: actually even do this. How could you do this to
Speaker 1: a child, a baby. To have withheld promising drugs from
Speaker 1: six children just because they were in foster care have
Speaker 1: been inhumane. Remember that in boycott the New York Times,
Speaker 1: and if you ever see anybody that works there, punch
Speaker 1: them in their face. And there is impressive evidence that
Speaker 1: the children were helped by the medications. Bullshit. Details on
Speaker 1: the evidence, however, were never offered up. We even requested
Speaker 1: that authors of the Times article named the studies that
Speaker 1: prove these statements, but there was no response. This might
Speaker 1: seem incredibly I'm surprised this author isn't hanging somewhere. You know,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden became suicidal after writing this book.
Speaker 1: This might seem incredibly shocking, but it is all too
Speaker 1: common in AIDS research. I have scoured the literature for
Speaker 1: evidence that the anti HIV drugs actually prolonged the lives
Speaker 1: or at least improve the quality of the lives of
Speaker 1: the children given these drugs, but I could not find
Speaker 1: any support of either possibility, says AIDS researcher David Rasnik.
Speaker 1: Another name that's school suspicious. For example, the study LAMA
Speaker 1: in HIV Infected children by Lewis and Company not only
Speaker 1: has no control group. But the authors also acknowledged that
Speaker 1: the anti retroviral study compound leamividde. Right, lamividine acts as
Speaker 1: a DNA chain terminator. Well, that shure sounds like it's
Speaker 1: promoting health and well being, and there is no data
Speaker 1: in the paper showing that the drug does anything good
Speaker 1: for the children. Well, you know, when you start messing
Speaker 1: with the DNA, you're causing cancers. On the contrary, among
Speaker 1: the ninety children in the study, eleven children had to
Speaker 1: be withdrawn from the study for disease progression, in other words,
Speaker 1: it didn't work for them, and ten because of possible
Speaker 1: lemividine lamividine related toxicity, and six had died. But the
Speaker 1: AIDS orthodoxy continued along its own path, calling the trials
Speaker 1: involving children so resounding in their success. See, it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what the reality is staring them right in the face.
Speaker 1: They're going to ignore all that, ignore all the things
Speaker 1: contrary that anybody can plainly see. And just because they
Speaker 1: speak it, it's the spell. The spell has been spoken.
Speaker 1: And it's so crazy how this works in the public
Speaker 1: that the tests are now being spread out to Asian
Speaker 1: and Africa. Good, let's go poison similar children some places
Speaker 1: where it's a little bit safer from scrutiny. According to
Speaker 1: Annie Bain, spokesperson for the Columbia University Medical Center, same
Speaker 1: culprits the same institutions in the most wicked acts to mankind,
Speaker 1: which was also involved in the trials. This is not
Speaker 1: unusual for AGE Research often goes into poor countries to
Speaker 1: carry out its medical medication trials. This is also true
Speaker 1: for trials of the efficacy of so called MicroB microbicides,
Speaker 1: which are said to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV
Speaker 1: and from which so much is promised, versus be determined
Speaker 1: that it's that is what it is. They don't even
Speaker 1: know what the nature of this thing that they call
Speaker 1: HIV is, or if it's even a thing. Marvelous microbicides
Speaker 1: the intervaginal intra vaginal gels could have could save millions
Speaker 1: of human lives, announce the Lancet in two thousand and four,
Speaker 1: then qualifying their hosts by adding that first someone has
Speaker 1: to prove that they were so, I need giddy pigs. Again,
Speaker 1: nothing has been proven at all yet the miracle has
Speaker 1: already been announced far and wide right right, They don't
Speaker 1: even know if that's a thing. But they're already good marketing, right.
Speaker 1: But making these statements and being in a place of authority,
Speaker 1: position of authority where you're the scientist, you're supposed I've
Speaker 1: already done all this research to verify your statements. People
Speaker 1: assume that the assumptions kill that that that is what
Speaker 1: the conclusion would be that they they did all the experiments,
Speaker 1: they did all the study, and they're telling us that
Speaker 1: there's a really high probability that these would be helpful. Right,
Speaker 1: another fault statement. They all work for the same entity,
Speaker 1: and that entity in the lower levels is profit driven,
Speaker 1: ego driven. But you can't be in those positions and
Speaker 1: be that stupid to not know that your your lives
Speaker 1: are harming and murdering people. Experts at the Lance and continues.
Speaker 1: Experts at the Lance and remember experts as the Lance continues.
Speaker 1: But there's the fake experts were of the firm opinion
Speaker 1: that microboscides will only reach every This is scary because
Speaker 1: these are the people that sit in court and however
Speaker 1: a way, their influence will say one thing or the other.
Speaker 1: These quote unquote experts, scientific experts, either hey, we we
Speaker 1: want to get this guy convicted, on something. You know.
Speaker 1: It's like, bring in the experts. They'll say what we
Speaker 1: want them to say. Experts, as the lance that continues,
Speaker 1: were of the firm opinion that microbicides will only reach
Speaker 1: everyone who needs them if large pharmaceutical companies get involved.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, bring in the large pharmaceutical companies, the ones
Speaker 1: that have absolutely no bias whatsoever, no skin in the game.
Speaker 1: In the remotest part of Thailand, you can buy a
Speaker 1: bottle of coke. We want microbes. We want microbes to
Speaker 1: be available like that is what they said. This is
Speaker 1: all the more striking if you consider that the first
Speaker 1: microbicide tests of the act of substance in oxyl nine
Speaker 1: ended in catastrophe at first and nine was also glorified
Speaker 1: by researchers as a microbicide with ideal potential by chrobicide
Speaker 1: with ideal my potential microbicide because in vitro test tube
Speaker 1: studies pointed to its effectiveness. Nine hundred sex workers from
Speaker 1: been in in the ivory coasts of South Africa and
Speaker 1: Thailand were selected for the clinical trial, which involves smearing
Speaker 1: gel laced with N nine into their vegi nos. But
Speaker 1: the jail only had no medical The jail had not
Speaker 1: only had no medical efficacy, as uneds admitted, it also
Speaker 1: damaged the poor women's epithelial cells. But they got rid
Speaker 1: of them sex workers, didn't they? And maybe that was
Speaker 1: the point Act study nineteen eighty seven a gigantic botch up.
Speaker 1: If there's if there is, say, if there is really
Speaker 1: doubt about whether a standard treatment is effective, the FDA
Speaker 1: should require that clinical trials of new treatments have three
Speaker 1: comparison groups, new drug, old drug, and placebo rights. Marsha Angele,
Speaker 1: former editor in chief of the New England Journal of
Speaker 1: Medicine for AIDS research, This is a lot of people
Speaker 1: probably assume that this is how it's done. They assume
Speaker 1: they might not even know the process, but they might.
Speaker 1: They probably assume that the research and the studies and
Speaker 1: the shit that's And look who funds the nih Rockefeller Foundation,
Speaker 1: the pharmaceutical companies themselves conducting their own experiments in house,
Speaker 1: And what do you think the results are going to
Speaker 1: be in favor of them or against their own investment?
Speaker 1: What do you think? Take a guess. And this is
Speaker 1: why it's so funny that people like our little buddy,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna say his name drinks his own piss
Speaker 1: because of an NIH study that they say there's specialized
Speaker 1: stem cells. Why do they say they were specialized because
Speaker 1: they don't know what the fuck they're looking at. But
Speaker 1: they're just going to call them stem cells so that
Speaker 1: they can get people to do the public shaming rituals
Speaker 1: that they do during satanic ritual abuse on themselves willfully.
Speaker 1: It's all a bunch of waste products in there. They're
Speaker 1: not filtering it, they're not doing any of that stuff.
Speaker 1: They're just drink the dude peas in a cup and
Speaker 1: drinks it every morning. For AGE research, this meant that
Speaker 1: for AGE research, this meant that the Facebook group had
Speaker 1: to be introduced to medical trials for their were justified
Speaker 1: doubts that the efficacy of AZT, the standard each treatment
Speaker 1: had really been had really be proven. Ben, I think
Speaker 1: it has to be been proven with the nineteen eighty
Speaker 1: seven fishcal study. John Nathan, I can't remember his name,
Speaker 1: That's why I'm not saying it, God damn it Jonathan
Speaker 1: something rather Otto. Yeah, Otto, that's the one who drinks
Speaker 1: his own paid asked me like I was the idiot.
Speaker 1: Why I didn't when our first and last conversation journalist
Speaker 1: and Harvard analyst John that's one of those things that's
Speaker 1: on my Patreon deep down if you're looking for it.
Speaker 1: Journalists and Harvard analyst John lewis Den, who has viewed
Speaker 1: the FDA documents on the official study, came to the
Speaker 1: conclusion that the study was fraud. The Swiss newspaper term
Speaker 1: the experiment a gigantic botch up. In NBC News in
Speaker 1: New York branded that the experiments conducted across the US
Speaker 1: as seriously flawed, criticism which is not to be found
Speaker 1: to the rest of the maitream media, either because the
Speaker 1: statements of the AIDS establishment are completely trusted, or because,
Speaker 1: like The Zeitung's scientific editorial staff, one simply does not
Speaker 1: know of even such a significant study as the official
Speaker 1: and company official experiments were in fact stopped after only
Speaker 1: four months after nineteen trial subjects in the placebo group,
Speaker 1: those who did not receive AZT but rather an inact
Speaker 1: of placebo, and only one participant from the so called
Speaker 1: veereum group those who were officially taking AZT had died
Speaker 1: through this according to the age Estallish, and the efficacy
Speaker 1: of AZT appeared to be proven. How does that even
Speaker 1: make any logical sense. They died on both sides, whether
Speaker 1: they took it or not, and act is period to
Speaker 1: be proven, but the argument doesn't add up. A clinical
Speaker 1: trial observation period of only four months is much too
Speaker 1: short to be informative of considering the usual practice of
Speaker 1: administering AIDS medications over years or even lifetime, and since
Speaker 1: long term studies are missing in these and other medical
Speaker 1: research fields. In the USA, for example, around one hundred
Speaker 1: billion dollars is spent annually on medical research. This figure
Speaker 1: has doubled since the mid nineties, and almost a third
Speaker 1: of it comes from tax dollars. Aren't you lucky? Aren't
Speaker 1: we lucky yet to poison people, to find a new
Speaker 1: way to mandate something to force upon your children. Otherwise, sorry,
Speaker 1: you can't go to school. They're using your money. This
Speaker 1: is why it's participation even. This is how they get
Speaker 1: your consent. This is how they get your subjugation to
Speaker 1: the system through taxation, which they then used as a
Speaker 1: weapon against you. Yeah, long term evaluations of pills and
Speaker 1: treatments are criminally neglected. Just one point six percent of
Speaker 1: the one hundred billion dollar budget is allocated to long
Speaker 1: term studies, and zero percent of it is allocated to
Speaker 1: studies of nutrition and clinical nutrition right for patients taking medications.
Speaker 1: This is like Russian roulette, states British doctor Robert Cayliff.
Speaker 1: The AZET study was I was financed by AZT manufacturer welcome,
Speaker 1: So here we go. Today it's called glassow Smith client.
Speaker 1: But this is the Welcome trust. Guys. The EZC study
Speaker 1: was financed by the same people who are behind the
Speaker 1: World Economic Forum. Yeah, and they don't want to depopulate anybody,
Speaker 1: do they, which is clearly a conflict of interest. But
Speaker 1: somehow this sloppiness of the official study didn't bother anyone,
Speaker 1: especially not the pharmaceutical groups nor the media. Oh and
Speaker 1: doesn't this start to like not connect already with what
Speaker 1: they're doing did with COVID and what they're about to
Speaker 1: do with Davian flu. Don't worry, we'll get to that
Speaker 1: as well, stars and the Avian whatever the fuck it.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's especially in pharmasico groups, for whom AZT would
Speaker 1: become a cash cow. It was actually said that AZT
Speaker 1: was worth its weight in gold. Yet the official studies
Speaker 1: double blind requirements, according to which neither researchers nor patients
Speaker 1: were permitted to see. It's worth its weight in gold.
Speaker 1: Before it was a complete travesty and failure. The guy
Speaker 1: who created it said it was the biggest waste of
Speaker 1: time he had ever put into anything, and it was
Speaker 1: too deadly to use. And that was in the sixties. Now,
Speaker 1: because of manipulating the minds of the public and scaring
Speaker 1: them these fear tactics, now it's worth its weight in gold.
Speaker 1: That's how they turned. They polished a turd and instead
Speaker 1: of just bronzing that turd, they plated it with gold.
Speaker 1: All right, So the official study double blind requirements according
Speaker 1: to which neither researchers, researchers nor patients were permitted to
Speaker 1: know who was taking AZT and who was taking a placebo,
Speaker 1: were violated after only a short time and their desire
Speaker 1: to be given the alleged wonder preparation. Patients even have
Speaker 1: their pills analyzed to be sure that they were among
Speaker 1: the group receiving the medication and not the placebo. So
Speaker 1: this is this is already this right, the sy up
Speaker 1: working on the person. So they want this, We want
Speaker 1: the poison because we've been told that that's the thing.
Speaker 1: That's the thing to take. Who knows, maybe if they
Speaker 1: weren't taking poison that was further destroying their immune system,
Speaker 1: their body would have bounce back if they were on
Speaker 1: a healthy diet. But they don't let you get that far, right,
Speaker 1: because once you get that positive test, whether you're sick
Speaker 1: or not or have anything, they're going to start putting
Speaker 1: on a drug that's going to present the same exact
Speaker 1: thing that they're saying that this quote unquote disease that
Speaker 1: they just made up is doing to you. That way,
Speaker 1: it's either you died because of the disease, or you
Speaker 1: died because of the disease, not because you didn't, not
Speaker 1: because you were poisoned to death by their drugs.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: FDA documents also revealed that the study results were distorted
Speaker 1: because the group that took AZT and had to battle
Speaker 1: the adverse side effects received more supportive medical services than
Speaker 1: the placebos subjects. And you understand what I meant there, right,
Speaker 1: the appearance and how they're going to play it off,
Speaker 1: sea just move the appearance and how they're going to
Speaker 1: play it off is because it's presenting the same type
Speaker 1: of symptoms, because the drug is doing the exact thing
Speaker 1: that they're saying that the disease does. And that why
Speaker 1: I think they actually manipulate this same type of philosophy
Speaker 1: when creating these types of drugs for these types of conditions,
Speaker 1: or they just tailor the conditions that they group the
Speaker 1: symptoms that they group under a certain drug name, I
Speaker 1: mean under a certain disease name to pay with the
Speaker 1: drug that they're about to give the person so that
Speaker 1: it's like masking what's doing what. But I see that as
Speaker 1: them using the homeopathic philosophy in reverse to harm people
Speaker 1: so that it's matching symptomology. Is they turn all good
Speaker 1: things inverted, right, Like if someone tried to invert things
Speaker 1: that you do, you should be like, wow, it must
Speaker 1: really be a good thing that I'm doing because they've
Speaker 1: they've gone through the time and effort to try to
Speaker 1: thwart it by this type of fuckery. For example, the
Speaker 1: ACT group had thirty patients were kept alive through the
Speaker 1: multiple blood transfusions until the end of the study. In
Speaker 1: the placebo group, on the other hand, this was only
Speaker 1: true in five cases, so transfusions were keeping them alive
Speaker 1: longer on the ACT side, and that's how they said
Speaker 1: the ACT was better even though it wasn't a one
Speaker 1: to one comparison. On the other side, who wasn't take
Speaker 1: who was taking the palcibo. There was widespread tampering with
Speaker 1: the rules of the official trial. The rules have been
Speaker 1: violated coast to coasts. That lead NBC reporter Perry Pelts
Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty eight adding that if all patients with
Speaker 1: protocol violations were dropped, there wouldn't be enough. You know,
Speaker 1: even if they said this on the TV at that time,
Speaker 1: when people are freaking out about it and that's the
Speaker 1: only thing that they think is going to save them,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. This goes. They can tell you this,
Speaker 1: They can tell you this, and it doesn't even penetrate
Speaker 1: because you're thinking survival mode. I need to look at
Speaker 1: that drug. When preparing this report, we repeatedly tried to
Speaker 1: interview doctor Anthony Faucher, you probably the most powerful AIDS
Speaker 1: official in the USA at the National Institute of Health,
Speaker 1: reports Pelts, but both doctor Fauci and the FLEET Drug
Speaker 1: Administration Commissioner Frank Jung declined our requests for interviews. These
Speaker 1: are the experiences of practically everyone who has criticized the
Speaker 1: theory of dominant AIDS medicine. The renowned British doctor and
Speaker 1: epidemiologist Gordon Stewart, for instance, said, I have asked the
Speaker 1: health authorities, editor in chief and other experts experts quote
Speaker 1: unquote concerned with the HIV AIDS, repeatedly for proof of
Speaker 1: their thesis, and I've been waiting for an answer since
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty four. Harvey Biali, co founder of Nature Biotechnology, said,
Speaker 1: I am very tired of hearing AIDS establishment scientists tell
Speaker 1: me they are too busy saving lives to sit down
Speaker 1: and refute Peter Duisberg's arguments, although each one assures me
Speaker 1: they could do it in a minute if they had to, well,
Speaker 1: then take that fucking minute. We also contacted leading mainstream
Speaker 1: mass media and specialized journals, including The New York Times, Time,
Speaker 1: Der Spiegel, Diezeit Stern, and a bunch of others. I'm
Speaker 1: not going to try to pronounce Nature Science asking them
Speaker 1: to send us clear evidence that the existence of HIV
Speaker 1: has been proven. That's so called HIV antibodies and PCR
Speaker 1: viral lood tests, as well as the CD four helpers
Speaker 1: sell count specifically diagnose HIV AIDS. The HIV is the
Speaker 1: soul or primary cause of the diseases grouped together as AIDS.
Speaker 1: That HIV is contagious and can be transmitted through sexual
Speaker 1: contact or blood. That anti retroviral preparations are effective and
Speaker 1: prolonged lifetime. That the AIDS statistics proclaiming proclaimed by the
Speaker 1: WHO in the UNAIDS are sound. That not that United Nations.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that is that non viral factors
Speaker 1: such as drugs, medications, and malnutrition can be ruled out
Speaker 1: as primary causes. Nice touch there, toxic overloud, environmental factors.
Speaker 1: Can you bull all those out? But today not a
Speaker 1: single study has been revealed to us, not even from
Speaker 1: any of the main orthodox scientists and journalists we queried.
Speaker 1: This includes Nature writer declan or Declin Butler, who wrote
Speaker 1: in the world renowned journal in two thousand and three.
Speaker 1: Most mainstream made researchers strongly dispute these statements that there
Speaker 1: is no proof that HIV causes AIDS. They refute the
Speaker 1: statement that there's no proof that it causes AIDS because reputation,
Speaker 1: lots of pressure, lots of money, lots of potential sudden
Speaker 1: what do you call it, sensations of suicidal tendencies If
Speaker 1: you don't follow the lie that HIV is contagious and
Speaker 1: so on, but Butler failed to respond to our request
Speaker 1: that he provided that he provide evidence of this in
Speaker 1: the form of relevant studies. We also contacted John Moore
Speaker 1: of Cornell University in New York, who was quoted in
Speaker 1: Butler's Nature Peace, and who thinks revisionists are best ignored.
Speaker 1: They are leading an unwinnable debate based on faith not fact. Well,
Speaker 1: that's a pretty inverted statement, since that's what they do.
Speaker 1: But when we ask more if he could name the
Speaker 1: factual evidence for his hivehicles as equals death sentence theory,
Speaker 1: he responded by calling these critics the HIV is a
Speaker 1: pussycat fact fraction and charge them with pure stupidity and malice.
Speaker 1: Scientific historian Horace Judson writes that central to the problem
Speaker 1: of misconduct is the response of institutions when charge is
Speaker 1: erupt again and again. The actions of senior scientists and
Speaker 1: administrators have been the very model of how not to respond.
Speaker 1: They have tried to smother the fire. Such flooded responses
Speaker 1: are altogether typical of misconduct cases. So these opinions were
Speaker 1: never known by the official trial subjects. After four years
Speaker 1: eighty percent of them have died. A short while later,
Speaker 1: all of them were dead. This is shocking, but not
Speaker 1: really surprising, considering that AZT is an extremely poisonous chemotherapy
Speaker 1: like medication invented by researcher Jerome Horowitz in the nineteen sixties.
Speaker 1: Horowitz's goal had been to develop a DNA blocker, which
Speaker 1: inhibits cell replication, to kill cancer cells, but his testimized
Speaker 1: perish from the extreme toxicities of AZT. Horrowitz says, on paper,
Speaker 1: logic was impeccable, but in reality it simply didn't work.
Speaker 1: Summarizes BusinessWeek journalist Bruce Nussbaum and his book Good Intentions
Speaker 1: how big business and medical establishments are corrupting the fight
Speaker 1: against AIDS, Alzheimer's cancer, and more. When the experiment and
Speaker 1: when the experiment ended in failure, so in a way,
Speaker 1: had the first half of Horrowitz's life disgusted, he turned
Speaker 1: on to AZT. Horowitz himself said he had. Horowitz said
Speaker 1: he was so kloyd with the drug that he dumped
Speaker 1: it in the junk pile. I didn't even keep the notebooks. Well,
Speaker 1: that's convenient. AZT was so worthless to him. That's his
Speaker 1: quote that he even didn't think it was worth patenting.
Speaker 1: The AIDS therapy dilemma. Well, now he's had a lot
Speaker 1: of money, I guess, because he would have had the
Speaker 1: patent if he didn't get the pat I don't know
Speaker 1: if he did. The eighth therapy dilemma. AZT was in
Speaker 1: fact stored away instead of being dumped it as a
Speaker 1: toxic waste, and when Aid's mania surfaced in the nineteen eighties,
Speaker 1: it was pulled out of the cupboard again and the
Speaker 1: AIDS virus hypothesis, just like the many other virus theories
Speaker 1: for serious illness like leukemia, breast cancer, multiple sclerosis, would
Speaker 1: probably have disintegrated long ago if not for AZT. In
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty seven, it became the AIDS therapy, even though
Speaker 1: in the recommended dosage it was absolutely fatal, absolutely fatal. Yes,
Speaker 1: age is such an epidemic. See how this works in
Speaker 1: their favor. See how deadly this disease is. People are
Speaker 1: dropping dead against in spite of all of our efforts. No,
Speaker 1: it's your efforts that are killing the people. The medical
Speaker 1: community ignored the possibility that AZD poisoning was the cause
Speaker 1: of death because they still had stuck in their minds
Speaker 1: the pictures of the first aide patients in the beginning
Speaker 1: of the nineteen eighties, who certainly looked as if they
Speaker 1: had been struck down and carried off by a deadly virus.
Speaker 1: Stop moving on. So when doctors looked at these AZT
Speaker 1: patients in nineteen eighty seven, they refused to make any
Speaker 1: connection with the highly toxic anti viral AZT. Their belief
Speaker 1: in the deadlines of oh sorry, their belief in the
Speaker 1: deadliness of HIV was so firm they can't see the
Speaker 1: force from the trees that they weren't even shocked when
Speaker 1: all patients died within a short time, right, because it
Speaker 1: was the disease certainly not them. And so with the
Speaker 1: fish study published in the n e j M New
Speaker 1: eng the Journal Medical Medicine, right, these doctors believed it
Speaker 1: works and still alleged to have tangible proof of ASTIS efficacy.
Speaker 1: So these are people with scientific brains looking at it
Speaker 1: and being right over the top of this study and
Speaker 1: still coming away with the incorrect observation when we can
Speaker 1: see it from a mile away the rise of the expert. Shit.
Speaker 1: But also this is and this comes down as fact,
Speaker 1: and this is what I think some people misunderstand when
Speaker 1: when Diego Garcia Dwayne says this, that they ry on
Speaker 1: facts because of what he's saying, is this notion that
Speaker 1: these facts that were being presented are actually fact. It's
Speaker 1: coming from the scientists, coming from the expert. It's coming
Speaker 1: from the scientific expert. And they are infallible, is what
Speaker 1: that means.
Speaker 2: And here you have it.
Speaker 1: Allegedly highly more educated than us. How they more high
Speaker 1: level of IQ and us can walk away from something
Speaker 1: after having been that close to it and still get
Speaker 1: the exact inverted perception of it HIV and these are
Speaker 1: the people that are in charge of every epidemic, every
Speaker 1: scare tactic. HIV mania appears to cause its own range
Speaker 1: of symptoms, primarily a strong bias against the facts, including
Speaker 1: that chemical substances like drugs or prescription medications, particularly anti viral,
Speaker 1: are extremely toxic and can trigger precisely the observed symptoms
Speaker 1: also mentioned on package labels, which they aim to prevent
Speaker 1: destruction of mitochondria, anemia, bone marrow, and consequently immune system damage,
Speaker 1: the exact things that happen when they say that the
Speaker 1: death the disease does. In the end, a vicious circle
Speaker 1: arises for alogists have no proof of their thesis that
Speaker 1: virus triggers the diseases grouped together on the term aids,
Speaker 1: so they consider proof to be collecting proof to be
Speaker 1: collecting subjective and subjective information from clinicians who assert that
Speaker 1: this is just awful to assert that medications are effective.
Speaker 1: But in industrialized countries, doctors very often treat patients not
Speaker 1: because they are sick. A large proportion have no physical
Speaker 1: complaints whatsoever, but rather because they have tested positive. They
Speaker 1: show only a certain number of helper sells or which
Speaker 1: they don't even know what this stuff means. They've made
Speaker 1: up with this stuff means. It's a snapshot in time.
Speaker 1: Could we have anything to do with their diet, their mood,
Speaker 1: anything can change things. And we don't even know what
Speaker 1: the hell the levels are supposed to be. But this
Speaker 1: is going to be a marker because we said so,
Speaker 1: and you're not going to know any better. So once
Speaker 1: we show you that it is what we said is
Speaker 1: low is low, you'll be like, ah, give me drugs,
Speaker 1: kill me my life, you'll say, But in reality you're
Speaker 1: saying kill me. But rather because they have testipos of
Speaker 1: the show. Certainly, okay, oh for all just tell generation, sorry,
Speaker 1: tell general practitioners that patients are carrying the deadly HIV,
Speaker 1: but they don't even know what that is, how to
Speaker 1: identify it, or any of that. The medications available for this, however,
Speaker 1: are highly toxic. Their use produces an immune deficiency syndrome.
Speaker 1: Oh like AIDS. Yeah, their use produces AIDS and exactly
Speaker 1: fulfills the predictions of the virus hypothesis that people will
Speaker 1: become severely ill and die. Isn't that convenient? No symptoms,
Speaker 1: This is COVID all over. This is this is what
Speaker 1: they've replayed with COVID, and they're gonna be about to
Speaker 1: replay it again. Healthy people are treated, and worsening health
Speaker 1: is then attributed to the viral illness, which the drug
Speaker 1: therapy cannot counter because it's the drug doing it. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: if the medication doesn't have any health stimulation stimulating effects,
Speaker 1: this is also attributed to HIV's alleged craftiness. Yes, HIV
Speaker 1: likes to stick and move like a boxer. The virus
Speaker 1: itself is said to cause treatment resistant viral mutations oh
Speaker 1: like pleomorphic microzyima, but not because it doesn't even exist
Speaker 1: in the first place. The patient dies with typical AID
Speaker 1: symptoms like dementia, wasting, weight loss, and neural damage in
Speaker 1: their virus fixation. Nobody imagines that the patient dies not
Speaker 1: of AIDS but of the very medical endeavors me to heal.
Speaker 1: Some HIV patients who are really sick do respond to
Speaker 1: antiretroviral medications, but this is because most of these patients
Speaker 1: suffer from what are called opportunistic infections, infections that occur
Speaker 1: as a result of an immunological physical weakness, which in
Speaker 1: turn can have many non viral causes. This means that
Speaker 1: they are infested by bacteria or fungi. In this context,
Speaker 1: antiretroviral treatment work like a shotgun therapy, destroying everything bound
Speaker 1: to DNA, including fungi, tuberculo bacteria, microbacteria, micobacteria, tuberculosis, and
Speaker 1: other micros. So, by the way, symptoms of tuberculosis were
Speaker 1: attached to AIDS. Yeah, so did they just rename something though?
Speaker 1: I don't know. So the therapy sometimes helps in the
Speaker 1: so called AIDS end stage, but it would actually be
Speaker 1: more sensible to treat opportunistic infections directly with antibiotics and
Speaker 1: antiphogical substances. The sensibility of such a treatment model was
Speaker 1: confirmed by a study. Why do you can't you just
Speaker 1: build up the body of strength and then maybe it
Speaker 1: would make it uninhabitable and for fungus. Right, once the
Speaker 1: body was strong enough to be no longer optidized over sugared,
Speaker 1: whatever the case may be, then that also repair without
Speaker 1: the use of antibiodots that are killing other cells too,
Speaker 1: because they're not specific. They don't go around hunting for
Speaker 1: certain things, they just kill whatever they contact. The sensibility
Speaker 1: of such a treatment model was confirmed by a study
Speaker 1: published in the American Journal of Respiratoryans Critical Care Medicine
Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty eight. HIV patients positive patients suffering from
Speaker 1: tuberculosis who received antiretrovile medications didn't do as well as
Speaker 1: TB patients who received conventional treatment. From an orthodox viewpoint,
Speaker 1: this is a paradox, so attempts are made to explain
Speaker 1: it away with immune reconstitution theory. This explanation of all
Speaker 1: saying that patients help its cells counts rise because HIV
Speaker 1: is purportedly, purportedly repelled by anti viral preparations. But they're
Speaker 1: so they're saying to sell it's a drug. We're we're
Speaker 1: fighting the good fight with their physical condition worse, since
Speaker 1: at some point in the future they postially at that
Speaker 1: patient's conditions would then improve. I look at the tables
Speaker 1: in the affirmation studies, however, shows that increases and help
Speaker 1: our sales weren't noticeable. Additionally, they didn't even get that right. Additionally,
Speaker 1: the health of many patients did not improve at all.
Speaker 1: On the contrary, and diminished health should be attributed to
Speaker 1: the damaging effects of the anti viral chemicals upon the
Speaker 1: immune system. Well, we're at one forty one right now.
Speaker 1: We'll continue this, man. I don't have time to get
Speaker 1: into the next phase of this, because we're gonna talk
Speaker 1: about how much full of shit the what do they
Speaker 1: call sponge ofform data da dad male cow disease not
Speaker 1: a thing, don't even worry about it, stupid. We'll get
Speaker 1: into that, and maybe I'll backtrad pedal and talk about
Speaker 1: the smallpox a little bit and Polio's kind of like
Speaker 1: because every every example builds upon itself to where you
Speaker 1: realize everything that they said is completely like childish ignorance.
Speaker 1: And we've been we've been following this and trusting this
Speaker 1: blindly for way too long. Way too long.
Speaker 6: And this.
Speaker 1: The true answers are simple, but they're not they're not lucrative.
Speaker 1: Go get doctor Peter Glidden's membership. Do it today if
Speaker 1: you can, and you save another one hundred and twenty
Speaker 1: dollars on the annual one. And that's find here, John
Speaker 1: to figure out what I was looking at there a second,
Speaker 1: and then that's not out here. But yeah, we're gonna
Speaker 1: get into stars, which is you know, REALLYD the COVID
Speaker 1: not really, it's just another word. It's just you get
Speaker 1: what I mean. It's all bullshit. You're in trouble. Haha,
Speaker 1: nice buddy. Uh let's see. Okay, here we are.
Speaker 4: This is us.
Speaker 1: This is rumble, all right, So ray yeah, doctor, get
Speaker 1: the membership from doctor Peter glinnon doctor Peter Glennon and
Speaker 1: d Health Recovery site. You click it boom b A
Speaker 1: A L B U S T E R S. It's
Speaker 1: either three dollars a month with this fifty percent off,
Speaker 1: which you can do, but you can also get it
Speaker 1: for two forty for the entire year, which saves you,
Speaker 1: which is like getting four months free. Or you can
Speaker 1: say it's twenty bucks a month. Yeah, all right, which
Speaker 1: is actually cheaper than what I pay. So there you go,
Speaker 1: because I do pay. There you have it. And we
Speaker 1: talked about the computer fund drive or I we already
Speaker 1: did that, so it gives a go right here boom
Speaker 1: in the description that ita okay or four fifty away.
Speaker 1: But I'm not that I would be upset if we
Speaker 1: got a little lecture because that would be a little
Speaker 1: bit of cushion in case things cost more than I
Speaker 1: think they're gonna. What else we got.
Speaker 4: Me?
Speaker 1: Let me just look at this book. Maybe I can
Speaker 1: get a little bit more today. Gaith knew that the
Speaker 1: medicines could kill Faust says a chemical cocktail will toxic
Speaker 1: side effects that often enough cause death, So an effective
Speaker 1: tubercular static therapy a combination of four antibiotics over six
Speaker 1: months followed by a combination of three for three months
Speaker 1: would then be prefer both to an anti viral one instead.
Speaker 1: These days, patients are even administered both a berculostatic for
Speaker 1: drug combo plus an anti HIV treatment and chemical cocktail
Speaker 1: with toxic side effects that often enough cause death with
Speaker 1: conventional treatments. The medications are stopped after these So again,
Speaker 1: even though this is saying this, and even though they
Speaker 1: talk about nutrition, there's still going about as wrong approaches,
Speaker 1: because the first approach would be build the body up,
Speaker 1: especially if you think it's if you think it's got
Speaker 1: anything to do with back to your or a fun guy.
Speaker 1: Build the body up, make it an uninhabitable place for
Speaker 1: stuff like that to grow, and then worry about whether
Speaker 1: or not you need something on top of that. With
Speaker 1: conventional treatments and medications are stopped after disease symptoms have subsided,
Speaker 1: but the belief in HIV prevents this from happening with
Speaker 1: HIV patients. At this point, the fixation on laboratory parameters
Speaker 1: come into play. So with conventional treatments medications are stopped
Speaker 1: after disease symps so, but they're going to continue to
Speaker 1: give it to the HIV patients, which will get them
Speaker 1: age and then they'll die, which age is just a
Speaker 1: condition of the drug. After an interruption and treatment, the
Speaker 1: viral THEO had measured using the PCR goes up again,
Speaker 1: as shown without any proof. Mainstream age doctors interpret this
Speaker 1: as a sign that HIV has multiplied once again, and
Speaker 1: reattacked the help ourselves with more force, so anti retroviral
Speaker 1: medication is ordered once again. And when the patient's condition worse,
Speaker 1: since again HIV is blamed and so the ultimate so
Speaker 1: the ultimately deadly preparations continue to be used. Gaith knew
Speaker 1: the medications could kill. Foust says, oh, this isn't from
Speaker 1: the book. Here was the medicine. The patients died, and
Speaker 1: nobody asked who was Nobody asked who convalesced. So we
Speaker 1: ravaged with the hellish electoris, which is medicine worse than
Speaker 1: the pestilence in these days in the effect, where's the
Speaker 1: pestilence in these valleys, these mountains. I myself administered the poison.
Speaker 1: Two thousands they withered. I had to witness that the
Speaker 1: brazen murderers were praised death all on the az T.
Speaker 1: The death of Freddie Mercury, Rudolph Nerva, and Arthur Ashe,
Speaker 1: who by the way, was afraid doncas He knew that
Speaker 1: the At one point in his life, Arthur ash realized
Speaker 1: that the drug was what was killing him. But he said,
Speaker 1: what when my doctors think if I stopped taking it? Basketball?
Speaker 1: So we'll get it. Yeah, so we'll start here next time,
Speaker 1: basketball star Magic Johnson. There is no magic in AZT,
Speaker 1: and no AZT in magic. That's why he didn't fall
Speaker 1: to the wayside like everybody else. He didn't continue taking
Speaker 1: his medicine after it made him sick, but he still
Speaker 1: let his likeness be showed as a as a positive
Speaker 1: uh case, you know, I mean like a positive testimonial
Speaker 1: that they're deadly drugs work. So he actually contributed to
Speaker 1: the multiple deaths that because of that type of manipulation
Speaker 1: and that type of you know, influence that he had
Speaker 1: for two separate companies, Abbott and whoever made the East
Speaker 1: Gatholops got Laxo Smith clin. I guess, all right, so
Speaker 1: we'll go from We'll go from here, and then hopefully
Speaker 1: this will be close to the end. If not, I
Speaker 1: was gonna skip over the rest of the eighth part
Speaker 1: because I want to get into the stars. I want
Speaker 1: to get into the Avian flu. I want to get
Speaker 1: into all of that in the in the mad cow disease.
Speaker 1: And then you'll see all these examples, all these examples,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to continue reading when I get on
Speaker 1: the elliptical today and we'll see if there's any more things.
Speaker 1: Because I get inspired while i'm reading. But I'm on elliptical,
Speaker 1: what am I gonna do. I actually did this on
Speaker 1: telegram once. I was like sweating and I had my
Speaker 1: phone and I was like doing a little video talking
Speaker 1: as nothing to do that. But yeah, because the thing
Speaker 1: is with when inspiration comes a shitty memory. I don't
Speaker 1: know why that is. I come up with some ideas
Speaker 1: sometimes that when there's no pen around and no place
Speaker 1: to type it out, no video to hit live stream
Speaker 1: and record on, and then they disappear, ideas for things
Speaker 1: I want to do with my business, Like they're like,
Speaker 1: that's freaking not great at it. And then dude, I'm like,
Speaker 1: there's no way I'm gonna forget that. I say it
Speaker 1: every time. There's no way I'm gonna forget that. No way,
Speaker 1: it's gone fucking completely wiped out of my mind. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's just so many things passing through it all the
Speaker 1: time that it's like it gets like diluted carried downstream.
Speaker 1: All right, everybody please help out the show. We're getting
Speaker 1: so close, so close. Let me read a couple of
Speaker 1: comments before we bounce out of here. If this was
Speaker 1: any of it to me, let's see we started. Yeah,
Speaker 1: at least we're giving pulled murdering polio. Yeah, murdering kids
Speaker 1: with polio shots and they can do the ordal too
Speaker 1: before they get blown up. Yeah, idf let those trucks through?
Speaker 1: I bet Yeah, of course they did. They're the ones
Speaker 1: that the UN said. So the UN is part of
Speaker 1: their little collective of the chosen Ones. Also doctor group, yeah,
Speaker 1: pete drinking enthusiasts. Yeah, because they hang out with Otto. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know this non doctor student. Well, not that that
Speaker 1: means anything anymore. We should figure that out, I know.
Speaker 1: But the pseudo science from an affluent Australian family who
Speaker 1: cries like a woman when he goes to Africa and
Speaker 1: sees suffering because it's more about his his hid than
Speaker 1: it is about them, and you can you can catch
Speaker 1: that about him. It's more about his own experience experiencing it,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. It's not about the people,
Speaker 1: because he doesn't have that type of thing. It's about
Speaker 1: his experience experiencing it, and woe is him. It's he's
Speaker 1: a horrible human being. And that's some one of the
Speaker 1: reasons why I think maybe we had a falling out
Speaker 1: with doctor artists because they're close and I made it.
Speaker 1: I had that one interview and I kind of put
Speaker 1: the screws to him. If you want to see, it's
Speaker 1: in Patreon. That one might. I don't know that one
Speaker 1: might be on the might not. You might not need
Speaker 1: to be an actual paid member to see. But it's
Speaker 1: gonna be buried because it's old otto. You're into some
Speaker 1: weird Yeah, you're into You're into me, some weird stuff
Speaker 1: that's funny. Outa's mom, Stop auto stuff, drinking pee, you're
Speaker 1: in trouble. Everybodys go with the jokes today. I love it.
Speaker 1: Fauci thought of the idea for AIDS at Bruce Springs Bay.
Speaker 1: Free cough is kind of is it kind of like
Speaker 1: a diddy free cough man. And I don't understand baby
Speaker 1: oil does that? No one ever heard of astroglide talk
Speaker 1: about with women you freak Come on all right, Uh,
Speaker 1: awesome work, Thank you for the good one. Poka CVS
Speaker 1: pharmacy high dress of double off by the Defense this
Speaker 1: season with flu and COVID vaccines, walk in our book,
Speaker 1: walk in or book your shots. Uh yeah yeah yeah dude,
Speaker 1: I like I said before, you know, until I walk
Speaker 1: into the Albertson's or someplace else with a pharmacy, This
Speaker 1: isn't in my mind that this is still happening, but
Speaker 1: it's constantly pumped through their intercom constantly, and I get
Speaker 1: so enraged, like they're calling people to their to their slaughter.
Speaker 1: People in a half aware state. Oh yeah, scary. Don't
Speaker 1: want to be sick because I have barely pay my bills.
Speaker 1: Now I can miss the work. Let's go get that
Speaker 1: shot that's going to do all these wonderful things for me.
Speaker 1: And you know what, I think part of the malnourishment
Speaker 1: affects the brain, because I think people would be a
Speaker 1: little bit sharper if it wasn't for that. I would
Speaker 1: like to see the IQ test performed before and after
Speaker 1: or ninety days of nutritional supplements. Yeah, I think that. Wow,
Speaker 1: I think that might actually be something that they look into,
Speaker 1: because where are all these dumb ass fucks coming from
Speaker 1: in the least little crunches. Imagine if it's just because
Speaker 1: they don't get enough nutrition, I'm sure they wouldn't become
Speaker 1: bright shining stars. And you know they're not going to
Speaker 1: be like the lawnmower man right become. And that's another
Speaker 1: movie that you know that kind of predicted the whole
Speaker 1: AI transhumanism thing, only the movie did that that had
Speaker 1: nothing to do with the Stephen King short story at all,
Speaker 1: as a dude eating grass balls ass naked, dark knock
Speaker 1: and eating like animals and that is weird. Anyway, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna get the mpox Avion Covid combo shot. CBS has
Speaker 1: given me a free cupon to Dairy Queen for the
Speaker 1: first ten thousand. Oh that's nice because I mean in
Speaker 1: five bucks for a blizzard, it's totally yeah, you should
Speaker 1: probably just risk your life instead. All right, guys, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean? Right, And also, as I point
Speaker 1: out in the descriptions all the time, but forget to
Speaker 1: do here, uh in the live chat, there's this little
Speaker 1: thing here that looks like a dollar sign. When you
Speaker 1: hover your finger over it, this whole circle turns green.
Speaker 1: You click that and that's our super chat. But it's
Speaker 1: called the Rumble. The Rumble rants here when ever you're
Speaker 1: doing last Geame and you want to do quickie. Hey,
Speaker 1: thanks for your support, Thanks, thanks for the effort. That
Speaker 1: da da da, It's just like it would work with
Speaker 1: a super chat. I read your comment and you know
Speaker 1: you help out the show and Rumble does. Although somebody
Speaker 1: said some kind of conspiratorial thing that they don't. Yes,
Speaker 1: they do, certainly do. It just takes sixty days to
Speaker 1: get it, so and they don't take you. They take
Speaker 1: ten percent less than what a googlement would take. So
Speaker 1: it's not that bad, all right, So if you want
Speaker 1: to do that, that would be awesome as well. And
Speaker 1: also at anytime I'm not saying this episode because it's
Speaker 1: almost ober, but like whenever you're here, see this right here,
Speaker 1: so that is found by clicking that. So you click
Speaker 1: this little guy here and you can change whatever you
Speaker 1: want there. It could be did they did they? Did
Speaker 1: they change that? Hold on? Okay, yeah, you can still do.
Speaker 1: You can still put type in your own. It's just
Speaker 1: instead of having it start at one dollar, now the
Speaker 1: little buttons start at five, which is kind of you
Speaker 1: know whatever, But I mean you can change it here
Speaker 1: just by typing it in. That was different. It used
Speaker 1: to just go up like little increments, but now it
Speaker 1: doesn't even go in betweens. They changed that because you
Speaker 1: could go dollar by dollar. Now it's in increments like that,
Speaker 1: So that's interesting. But you can always change it right here,
Speaker 1: say three, and then click outside of it and there
Speaker 1: there you go. Then you take your little thing bump up,
Speaker 1: and then all right, all right, all right, so there's
Speaker 1: a way, There are ways and ways to manipulate it,
Speaker 1: so you don't have to go based off if they're
Speaker 1: already pre uh preset structure there. Now I'm really out
Speaker 1: by
Speaker 6: H