WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>If you have carried a relationship that never fit neatly

2
00:00:03.160 --> 00:00:06.879
<v Speaker 1>into one story, you already know how heavy that weight

3
00:00:06.919 --> 00:00:10.439
<v Speaker 1>can feel. Parts of it brought real care and moments

4
00:00:10.480 --> 00:00:15.839
<v Speaker 1>of connection, yet other parts left hurt that still lingers. Today,

5
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we sit with that middle ground. We look at what

6
00:00:18.839 --> 00:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it means to grieve without forcing the past into a

7
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:26.039
<v Speaker 1>simpler version of itself, one that erases either the good

8
00:00:26.160 --> 00:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>or the harm. Because grief does not always arrive after

9
00:00:30.039 --> 00:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a clean break, many of us end up sorting through

10
00:00:32.920 --> 00:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>mixed memories that refuse to line up. Meanwhile, the pressure

11
00:00:36.640 --> 00:00:39.799
<v Speaker 1>to pick a single label only adds another layer of confusion.

12
00:00:40.280 --> 00:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Pauline Boss wrote about this an Ambiguous Loss back in

13
00:00:43.359 --> 00:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety nine, and her work on complicated loss still

14
00:00:46.960 --> 00:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>helps explain why these bonds resist easy resolution. The episode

15
00:00:52.000 --> 00:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>draws from that research while staying rooted in the experience

16
00:00:55.280 --> 00:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you are living right now. We will not rush toward

17
00:00:58.039 --> 00:01:02.799
<v Speaker 1>any tidy ending or demand that you rewrite what actually happened. Instead,

18
00:01:03.039 --> 00:01:05.799
<v Speaker 1>we stay present, with both the affection and the pain

19
00:01:06.319 --> 00:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>side by side. Here is the thing, The topic many

20
00:01:10.719 --> 00:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>listeners are carrying today centers on exactly this tension. Grieving

21
00:01:15.599 --> 00:01:20.879
<v Speaker 1>a complicated relationship without rewriting the past. When a relationship

22
00:01:20.920 --> 00:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>holds both real affection and real pain at the same time,

23
00:01:25.879 --> 00:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>grief asks you to carry all of it without trimming

24
00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>anything away. You do not have to pick one feeling

25
00:01:32.920 --> 00:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and set the other aside. The task instead becomes learning

26
00:01:37.079 --> 00:01:40.079
<v Speaker 1>how to keep room for the warmth that existed alongside

27
00:01:40.120 --> 00:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the disappointment or conflict that also lived there. Because those

28
00:01:45.159 --> 00:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>memories refuse to line up in a straight line, many

29
00:01:47.680 --> 00:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>people notice and urge to straighten them out. Anyway that

30
00:01:51.519 --> 00:01:54.719
<v Speaker 1>urge to rewrite the past often surfaces because the mixed

31
00:01:54.719 --> 00:01:57.599
<v Speaker 1>feelings create a kind of pressure that feels hard to

32
00:01:57.640 --> 00:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sit with. Grief already brings enough weight on its own.

33
00:02:02.680 --> 00:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>When the story refuses to settle into one clear version,

34
00:02:06.439 --> 00:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the mind sometimes tries to make this point simpler by

35
00:02:09.680 --> 00:02:12.879
<v Speaker 1>pushing everything toward the good side or everything toward the

36
00:02:12.919 --> 00:02:16.759
<v Speaker 1>difficult side. Idealizing can feel like protection in the moment,

37
00:02:17.120 --> 00:02:19.879
<v Speaker 1>while villainizing can feel like a way to create distance

38
00:02:19.879 --> 00:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>from the hurt. Both moves come from the same place,

39
00:02:22.960 --> 00:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>though they try to reduce the tension that comes from

40
00:02:25.840 --> 00:02:30.319
<v Speaker 1>holding two truths together. Megan Divine describes this pattern in

41
00:02:30.360 --> 00:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>her book it's okay that you're not okay. She notes

42
00:02:34.719 --> 00:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that these attempts to edit the past show up because

43
00:02:38.039 --> 00:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>grief does not follow the neat rules we might expect

44
00:02:41.080 --> 00:02:45.159
<v Speaker 1>it to follow. The rewriting impulse appears for plenty of people,

45
00:02:45.520 --> 00:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and its presence does not make the grief any less

46
00:02:48.159 --> 00:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>real or any less valid. It simply shows that the

47
00:02:52.039 --> 00:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>relationship sat in a complicated middle space, and the loss

48
00:02:56.039 --> 00:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>keeps bringing that middle space back into view. The pattern

49
00:03:00.159 --> 00:03:02.719
<v Speaker 1>shows up because the brain looks for ways to ease

50
00:03:02.840 --> 00:03:07.599
<v Speaker 1>internal conflict when energy runs low. Carrying two sides of

51
00:03:07.599 --> 00:03:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a story takes steady effort. When that effort meets exhaustion,

52
00:03:12.159 --> 00:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or when reminders arrive without warning, the pull toward one

53
00:03:15.879 --> 00:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>cleaner version grows stronger. Yet the actual relationship lived in

54
00:03:20.599 --> 00:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that middle ground, and grief keeps pointing back to it,

55
00:03:24.199 --> 00:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>rather than letting the story collapse into one extreme or

56
00:03:26.960 --> 00:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the other. This does not mean the affection was false

57
00:03:30.879 --> 00:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>or that the pain was imagined. It means both parts

58
00:03:34.479 --> 00:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>belong to the same connection, and both parts deserve to

59
00:03:37.919 --> 00:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>stay when grief arrives. Many listeners find that the rewriting

60
00:03:42.919 --> 00:03:45.719
<v Speaker 1>urge fades a little once they notice it. Without needing

61
00:03:45.719 --> 00:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to act on it right away. The discomfort remains, however,

62
00:03:49.599 --> 00:03:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and that discomfort does not signal failure. It signals that

63
00:03:53.199 --> 00:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the relationship never fit the simple categories we sometimes wish

64
00:03:57.479 --> 00:04:00.159
<v Speaker 1>it would fit. Here is the thing that offen and

65
00:04:00.199 --> 00:04:03.639
<v Speaker 1>catches people off guard. The same memories can feel tender

66
00:04:03.680 --> 00:04:06.159
<v Speaker 1>one day and sharp the next, without any change in

67
00:04:06.199 --> 00:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the facts themselves. One afternoon, the good moments rise first,

68
00:04:10.439 --> 00:04:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and the next morning the arguments feel louder. Both experiences

69
00:04:14.240 --> 00:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>point back to the same relationship, and both belong inside

70
00:04:18.040 --> 00:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the grief. I remember sitting with this exact pressure after

71
00:04:22.519 --> 00:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>someone close to me died. The relationship had carried real

72
00:04:26.199 --> 00:04:29.519
<v Speaker 1>care and real friction for years. In the weeks right

73
00:04:29.560 --> 00:04:32.079
<v Speaker 1>after the loss, I caught myself smoothing over the hard

74
00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>parts until the person almost sounded like someone they had

75
00:04:34.639 --> 00:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>never been. Then a few days later, the opposite happened,

76
00:04:38.120 --> 00:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and every difficult exchange stood out in sharp detail while

77
00:04:41.120 --> 00:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the kindness dropped away. Neither version fell complete, yet each

78
00:04:44.839 --> 00:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>one offered temporary relief from the mixture. The shift happened

79
00:04:49.199 --> 00:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>during an ordinary afternoon when I found an old message

80
00:04:52.759 --> 00:04:55.319
<v Speaker 1>that did not match either picture I had been holding

81
00:04:56.160 --> 00:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the words sat somewhere between warm and strained, and they

82
00:04:59.360 --> 00:05:02.879
<v Speaker 1>refused to let me keep the story neat That single

83
00:05:02.959 --> 00:05:05.319
<v Speaker 1>message made it clear that the rewriting had been an

84
00:05:05.319 --> 00:05:08.319
<v Speaker 1>attempt to manage the weight, rather than a reflection of

85
00:05:08.319 --> 00:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what had actually existed. The relief came not from forcing

86
00:05:11.839 --> 00:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the memory into one shape, but from letting the mixed

87
00:05:14.680 --> 00:05:18.959
<v Speaker 1>version stay mixed. Since then, I have noticed how often

88
00:05:19.000 --> 00:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that same pressure shows up for others who carry complicated bonds.

89
00:05:23.120 --> 00:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>The details change, but the pattern stays familiar. The affection

90
00:05:27.399 --> 00:05:30.759
<v Speaker 1>and the pain keep company, and grief asks us to

91
00:05:30.800 --> 00:05:34.399
<v Speaker 1>make room for the company they keep. I remember sitting

92
00:05:34.480 --> 00:05:38.079
<v Speaker 1>with my own experience of this after my aunt passed

93
00:05:38.120 --> 00:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a few years back. She had raised me for stretches

94
00:05:41.600 --> 00:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>when my parents worked long shifts, so there were afternoons

95
00:05:45.040 --> 00:05:46.959
<v Speaker 1>where she taught me how to fix a bike chain,

96
00:05:47.360 --> 00:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and nights where she read the same chapter aloud until

97
00:05:50.480 --> 00:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the words blurred. At the same time, she carried a

98
00:05:53.879 --> 00:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>temper that could turn sharp without warning. One moment she

99
00:05:57.839 --> 00:06:00.639
<v Speaker 1>would hand over the last slice of pie, and the

100
00:06:00.680 --> 00:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>next she would remind me that I had already taken

101
00:06:03.399 --> 00:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>more than my share. When she died, the memories arrived

102
00:06:07.360 --> 00:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in that same jumbled order. For the first weeks, I

103
00:06:11.560 --> 00:06:14.639
<v Speaker 1>kept trying to sort them into a single column. Either

104
00:06:14.720 --> 00:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>she had been generous and the hard edges were just

105
00:06:17.720 --> 00:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>my misreading, or the hard edges were the real story

106
00:06:21.720 --> 00:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and the generosity had been in act. I would catch

107
00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>myself rewriting a scene in my head, so the pie

108
00:06:28.120 --> 00:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>moment stood alone, or so the sharp remark stood alone.

109
00:06:32.199 --> 00:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Each version felt cleaner for a few hours, yet the

110
00:06:35.279 --> 00:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>relief never lasted. The next memory would surface and demand

111
00:06:39.040 --> 00:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>its place. Anyway. One afternoon, I was sorting through a

112
00:06:42.519 --> 00:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>box of her old letters and found one she had

113
00:06:45.040 --> 00:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sent after a fight we had about a job I

114
00:06:47.199 --> 00:06:51.439
<v Speaker 1>wanted to take. The letter started with an apology and

115
00:06:51.639 --> 00:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>ended with a list of reasons I would probably fail.

116
00:06:55.199 --> 00:06:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Reading it again, I felt the old tug to decide

117
00:06:57.920 --> 00:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>which half mattered more. Instead, I left both halves. In

118
00:07:01.639 --> 00:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>practical terms, I let the apology sit next to the list,

119
00:07:05.600 --> 00:07:09.319
<v Speaker 1>without forcing one to explain the other away. The strange

120
00:07:09.360 --> 00:07:12.079
<v Speaker 1>part was how much lighter the room felt once I

121
00:07:12.160 --> 00:07:16.519
<v Speaker 1>stopped editing. That same pattern showed up again. When friends

122
00:07:16.560 --> 00:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>asked how I was doing, they would offer the usual

123
00:07:19.759 --> 00:07:22.399
<v Speaker 1>line about how close we must have been, and I

124
00:07:22.399 --> 00:07:25.639
<v Speaker 1>would hear myself agree or disagree, depending on the day.

125
00:07:26.519 --> 00:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>The truth stayed in the middle. I missed the version

126
00:07:29.560 --> 00:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of her who showed up with soup when I was sick,

127
00:07:32.279 --> 00:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and I still felt the old flinch when I remembered

128
00:07:34.680 --> 00:07:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the version who could dismiss an idea before I finished speaking.

129
00:07:39.040 --> 00:07:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Holding both did not cancel the missing. It simply kept

130
00:07:42.439 --> 00:07:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the missing from turning into something smaller than it was.

131
00:07:46.480 --> 00:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>The pull to flatten the story makes sense when every

132
00:07:49.720 --> 00:07:53.439
<v Speaker 1>feeling arrives at once, The mind reaches for a shorter

133
00:07:53.560 --> 00:07:57.879
<v Speaker 1>version because a shorter version uses less energy. Yet the

134
00:07:57.920 --> 00:08:02.199
<v Speaker 1>shorter version also leaves pieces of the relationship stranded, and

135
00:08:02.279 --> 00:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>those pieces keep knocking until they are let back in,

136
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>allowing the full picture meant some days the missing felt heavier,

137
00:08:10.439 --> 00:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>yet other days the lighter moments returned without the shame

138
00:08:14.240 --> 00:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of having ignored them before. This is the part that

139
00:08:17.759 --> 00:08:21.199
<v Speaker 1>connects to what so many people notice when the relationship

140
00:08:21.240 --> 00:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>they lost refused to fit a single label. The grief

141
00:08:25.839 --> 00:08:29.319
<v Speaker 1>does not line up in neat rows. It circles back

142
00:08:29.360 --> 00:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>through the same scenes and asks whether today is the

143
00:08:32.159 --> 00:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>day both sides are permitted to stay. When that permission

144
00:08:35.759 --> 00:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is given. Even for a short stretch, the pressure inside

145
00:08:39.000 --> 00:08:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the chest eases by a fraction, not because the story

146
00:08:42.440 --> 00:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>becomes easier to tell, but because it no longer has

147
00:08:45.519 --> 00:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to be told in only one direction. We will take

148
00:08:49.000 --> 00:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>a short break here. When we return, the conversation will

149
00:08:52.679 --> 00:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>pick up with how these mixed memories shape the days

150
00:08:55.600 --> 00:08:59.799
<v Speaker 1>that follow. When someone holds both affection and frustration toward

151
00:08:59.799 --> 00:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the same person, the feelings rarely arrive one at a time.

152
00:09:04.279 --> 00:09:07.879
<v Speaker 1>They show up together in a single afternoon. You might

153
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:10.879
<v Speaker 1>miss the sound of their voice while also remembering the

154
00:09:10.919 --> 00:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>way their criticism landed and still stung. That overlap is

155
00:09:15.679 --> 00:09:20.799
<v Speaker 1>ordinary in complicated relationships because the bond itself never settled

156
00:09:20.799 --> 00:09:25.399
<v Speaker 1>into one clean category. The research from Sheer and colleagues,

157
00:09:25.440 --> 00:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in

158
00:09:28.440 --> 00:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, tracked people after significant losses and found that

159
00:09:33.039 --> 00:09:37.279
<v Speaker 1>memories staying sharply polarized raised the chance of prolonged grief.

160
00:09:37.919 --> 00:09:41.639
<v Speaker 1>The Center for Complicated Grief at Columbia University has continued

161
00:09:41.679 --> 00:09:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to examine this pattern and notes that the brain sometimes

162
00:09:45.000 --> 00:09:49.039
<v Speaker 1>keeps positive and negative recollections in separate mental boxes because

163
00:09:49.080 --> 00:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it tries to reduce internal conflict. Yet that separation can

164
00:09:53.080 --> 00:09:56.399
<v Speaker 1>keep the grief process from moving forward in its own

165
00:09:56.519 --> 00:10:00.879
<v Speaker 1>uneven way. Stages or tasks of mourning and therefore do

166
00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>not demand that every contradiction be ironed out into a

167
00:10:04.600 --> 00:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>single consistent story. You can feel grateful for certain moments

168
00:10:09.000 --> 00:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and still carry disappointment about others without forcing those pieces

169
00:10:13.240 --> 00:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to match. The work instead involves letting both sides exist

170
00:10:18.279 --> 00:10:21.639
<v Speaker 1>side by side, even when they clash. In other words,

171
00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the process makes room for the full range of what

172
00:10:24.919 --> 00:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>was true, rather than requiring a tidy summary. Because the

173
00:10:29.519 --> 00:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>earlier sections of this conversation touched on the urge to

174
00:10:32.759 --> 00:10:35.919
<v Speaker 1>rewrite the past, it helps to notice how that urge

175
00:10:35.960 --> 00:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>often comes from the pressure of those conflicting emotions. When

176
00:10:39.759 --> 00:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>friends asked how things felt after my aunt died, the

177
00:10:42.840 --> 00:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>question sometimes pushed me towards choosing one feeling over another.

178
00:10:46.879 --> 00:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I would catch myself saying she was difficult or that

179
00:10:49.879 --> 00:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>we had been close, depending on who listened and what

180
00:10:52.840 --> 00:10:57.759
<v Speaker 1>seemed easier to explain. However, the research suggests that keeping

181
00:10:57.799 --> 00:11:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the memories polarized in that way can extend the period

182
00:11:01.399 --> 00:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of intense distress. The Center for Complicated Grief at Columbia

183
00:11:05.759 --> 00:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>University points out that integration happens gradually when the mind

184
00:11:10.039 --> 00:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>stops treating the positive and negative recollections as mutually exclusive. Meanwhile,

185
00:11:16.159 --> 00:11:19.039
<v Speaker 1>the tasks of mourning allow for this gradual shift without

186
00:11:19.080 --> 00:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a deadline. You might spend one week mostly focused on

187
00:11:22.480 --> 00:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the good conversations you shared, and then find the next

188
00:11:25.519 --> 00:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>week dominated by the arguments that never got resolved. Both

189
00:11:29.720 --> 00:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>periods count as part of the same process. The stages

190
00:11:33.279 --> 00:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>do not require you to land on a final verdict

191
00:11:35.720 --> 00:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>about the relationship itself. Instead, they support carrying the whole

192
00:11:39.720 --> 00:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>picture forward, even when parts of it still feel at odds.

193
00:11:43.440 --> 00:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, many people discover that the contradictions begin to

194
00:11:46.960 --> 00:11:49.879
<v Speaker 1>soften on their own once there is less pressure to

195
00:11:49.919 --> 00:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>resolve them quickly. The study by Sheer and colleagues showed

196
00:11:54.200 --> 00:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that people who could tolerate mixed recollections without immediate judgment

197
00:11:58.480 --> 00:12:01.799
<v Speaker 1>reported lower levels of pro longed grief symptoms over time.

198
00:12:02.799 --> 00:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>That finding aligns with what the Center for Complicated Grief

199
00:12:06.519 --> 00:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia University observes in their ongoing work with families

200
00:12:10.720 --> 00:12:15.039
<v Speaker 1>who face similar losses. The pattern appears because the nervous

201
00:12:15.080 --> 00:12:18.799
<v Speaker 1>system gradually adjusts when it no longer has to defend

202
00:12:18.960 --> 00:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>one side of the memory against the other. However, the

203
00:12:21.600 --> 00:12:25.919
<v Speaker 1>adjustment rarely feels linear. One day a memory surfaces that

204
00:12:25.919 --> 00:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>brings warmth, and the next day a different memory brings irritation.

205
00:12:29.919 --> 00:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Both belong to the experience. The work lies in noticing

206
00:12:33.600 --> 00:12:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the shift without deciding that one version must replace the other.

207
00:12:37.480 --> 00:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Because the earlier parts of this episode describe the letters

208
00:12:40.360 --> 00:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and conversations that surfaced after my aunt died, those moments

209
00:12:44.159 --> 00:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>illustrate how the mixed material shows up in ordinary ways.

210
00:12:47.840 --> 00:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Sorting through old papers can bring both comfort and tension

211
00:12:51.080 --> 00:12:54.519
<v Speaker 1>in the same hour. The reality is that grief in

212
00:12:54.559 --> 00:12:57.759
<v Speaker 1>these situations often asks for patients with the back and

213
00:12:57.840 --> 00:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>forth rather than a single coherent narrative. The stages or

214
00:13:02.080 --> 00:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>tasks therefore function more like guide posts than checkpoints that

215
00:13:06.080 --> 00:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>must be cleared in order. You can revisit the same

216
00:13:09.080 --> 00:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>territory several times and still move through the overall process.

217
00:13:13.159 --> 00:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>The research from Sheer and colleagues in the Journal of

218
00:13:15.600 --> 00:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the American Medical Association supports this view by linking flexible

219
00:13:19.639 --> 00:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>memory patterns with steadier adaptation after loss. Meanwhile, listeners who

220
00:13:24.720 --> 00:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>recognize their own relationships in these descriptions may notice that

221
00:13:28.720 --> 00:13:33.039
<v Speaker 1>their memories also refuse to line up neatly. That recognition

222
00:13:33.200 --> 00:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>can open a quiet space for whatever shows up next.

223
00:13:37.600 --> 00:13:41.519
<v Speaker 1>The Center for Complicated Grief at Columbia University emphasizes that

224
00:13:41.639 --> 00:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>allowing the full range of recollections reduces the need to

225
00:13:45.399 --> 00:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>keep them separated. Over time, the mind tends to hold

226
00:13:50.360 --> 00:13:53.759
<v Speaker 1>more of the story at once, without the sharp divide

227
00:13:53.759 --> 00:13:58.159
<v Speaker 1>that once felt necessary. Ultimately, the section of this conversation

228
00:13:58.240 --> 00:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that follows will turn toward how how those same memories

229
00:14:01.240 --> 00:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to surface in daily life and what small practices

230
00:14:04.879 --> 00:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>can support that ongoing process. For now, the invitation stays

231
00:14:09.279 --> 00:14:12.639
<v Speaker 1>open for each person to notice where their own recollections

232
00:14:12.639 --> 00:14:17.399
<v Speaker 1>sit side by side without forcing them into agreement. One

233
00:14:17.519 --> 00:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>listener shared a story about their father. They described years

234
00:14:21.320 --> 00:14:24.039
<v Speaker 1>of shared fishing trips that felt warm at the time,

235
00:14:24.559 --> 00:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>yet sat beside moments of sharp criticism that never seemed

236
00:14:28.120 --> 00:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to stop. Because the memories refused to sort themselves, the

237
00:14:32.320 --> 00:14:35.639
<v Speaker 1>person found themselves editing the hard parts out of family

238
00:14:35.679 --> 00:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>photos in their mind. Another submission came from someone whose

239
00:14:39.480 --> 00:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>partner of eight years had offered steady support during illness

240
00:14:42.679 --> 00:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>while also creating arguments that left both people drained. That

241
00:14:46.559 --> 00:14:49.799
<v Speaker 1>writer noticed the same urge appear after the breakup, when

242
00:14:49.840 --> 00:14:53.159
<v Speaker 1>friends asked for a simple version of events. A third

243
00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:56.039
<v Speaker 1>note arrived from a person reflecting on a childhood friend.

244
00:14:56.480 --> 00:14:58.879
<v Speaker 1>The two had built a bond through late night talks

245
00:14:59.200 --> 00:15:02.519
<v Speaker 1>and shared loss, but the friend had also withdrawn during

246
00:15:02.519 --> 00:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a key crisis. Here, the writer spoke of trying to

247
00:15:05.759 --> 00:15:09.639
<v Speaker 1>frame the whole connection as either loyal or distant, without

248
00:15:09.679 --> 00:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>room for both. These accounts sit alongside one another, even

249
00:15:14.080 --> 00:15:18.039
<v Speaker 1>though the relationships differ in length and daily shape. The

250
00:15:18.080 --> 00:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>common threat appears in the repeated mention of pressure to

251
00:15:21.279 --> 00:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>flatten what happened into something easier to carry. One person

252
00:15:25.679 --> 00:15:29.039
<v Speaker 1>called it rewriting the record, while another spoke of smoothing

253
00:15:29.159 --> 00:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>edges so the story could fit into conversations without extra explanation.

254
00:15:34.200 --> 00:15:36.559
<v Speaker 1>A third described the same pull as a need to

255
00:15:36.639 --> 00:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>choose a single feeling that could stand in for all

256
00:15:39.080 --> 00:15:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the rest. The language shifts, yet the direction stays similar,

257
00:15:42.960 --> 00:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>because mixed memories create discomfort that asks for resolution. That

258
00:15:48.159 --> 00:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>variety shows up in how each submission handles the push.

259
00:15:52.080 --> 00:15:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Some focus on the relationship itself, while others turned toward

260
00:15:55.600 --> 00:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the reactions of people around them. One writer mentioned family

261
00:15:59.240 --> 00:16:02.159
<v Speaker 1>members who prefer a kinder version of the parent, and

262
00:16:02.279 --> 00:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>how that preference made the mixed feelings feel even more

263
00:16:05.000 --> 00:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>out of place. Another noted coworkers who expected a clean

264
00:16:08.559 --> 00:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>story about the former partner, which left little space for

265
00:16:11.360 --> 00:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the gratitude that still remained. The friend's story included questions

266
00:16:15.080 --> 00:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>from mutual acquaintances who wanted to know whether contact had

267
00:16:18.080 --> 00:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>ended completely. Because these details arrive in different forms, they

268
00:16:22.200 --> 00:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>keep the experiences distinct rather than interchangeable. Hearing these accounts

269
00:16:27.519 --> 00:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>can open space for your own memories to stay as

270
00:16:29.720 --> 00:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they are. The stories do not line up into one pattern,

271
00:16:33.159 --> 00:16:35.519
<v Speaker 1>yet each one returns to the same question of how

272
00:16:35.559 --> 00:16:39.039
<v Speaker 1>to hold affection and disappointment without forcing one aside. That

273
00:16:39.159 --> 00:16:42.759
<v Speaker 1>return happens at different speeds and with different words, which

274
00:16:42.840 --> 00:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>leaves room for the version you carry to remain untouched

275
00:16:45.879 --> 00:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>by comparison. From there, some people find it useful to

276
00:16:49.679 --> 00:16:53.559
<v Speaker 1>notice when the urge to rewrite shows up during ordinary moments.

277
00:16:54.120 --> 00:16:56.559
<v Speaker 1>You might catch it while looking at an old message

278
00:16:56.919 --> 00:17:00.759
<v Speaker 1>or while answering a routine question about the person. Instead

279
00:17:00.759 --> 00:17:03.679
<v Speaker 1>of following the rewrite right away, the pause itself can

280
00:17:03.759 --> 00:17:06.079
<v Speaker 1>let both sides of the memory stay present for a

281
00:17:06.119 --> 00:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>little longer. Over time, that noticing builds a habit of

282
00:17:09.279 --> 00:17:11.759
<v Speaker 1>staying with the full picture, because the discomfort does not

283
00:17:11.880 --> 00:17:14.519
<v Speaker 1>have to be solved in one sitting. The same pattern

284
00:17:14.519 --> 00:17:17.279
<v Speaker 1>appeared across the submissions, even though the writers reach different

285
00:17:17.319 --> 00:17:20.759
<v Speaker 1>points in their own process. One still felt the poll daily,

286
00:17:21.000 --> 00:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>while another described longer stretches between the moments of simplification.

287
00:17:27.440 --> 00:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Rinses matter because they show that the rewrite impulse does

288
00:17:31.279 --> 00:17:34.759
<v Speaker 1>not follow a single schedule or demand a single response.

289
00:17:35.720 --> 00:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Practical ways of staying with the complexity often start with

290
00:17:39.559 --> 00:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>small choices about what gets said out loud. You can

291
00:17:43.240 --> 00:17:45.799
<v Speaker 1>keep the longer version of a story when someone asks

292
00:17:45.880 --> 00:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>and let the silence after your answers sit without filling it.

293
00:17:50.079 --> 00:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Or you can write the mixed details in a note

294
00:17:52.279 --> 00:17:55.079
<v Speaker 1>that stays private so the contradictions do not need to

295
00:17:55.119 --> 00:17:58.839
<v Speaker 1>be defended. These steps do not remove the discomfort, yet

296
00:17:58.839 --> 00:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they give the memories a place to rest without being trimmed.

297
00:18:02.559 --> 00:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Because the listener accounts each touched on that trimming in

298
00:18:05.680 --> 00:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>their own words, the move toward keeping the full record

299
00:18:09.359 --> 00:18:13.759
<v Speaker 1>becomes a shared direction rather than an isolated effort. The

300
00:18:13.799 --> 00:18:17.759
<v Speaker 1>process continues from there, as each day brings its own reminders,

301
00:18:18.160 --> 00:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and each reminder offers another chance to let the story

302
00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>remain whole. Some listeners have found it helpful to set

303
00:18:24.680 --> 00:18:27.559
<v Speaker 1>aside a quiet stretch of time and write two separate

304
00:18:27.640 --> 00:18:30.839
<v Speaker 1>lists rather than trying to weave everything into one story.

305
00:18:31.519 --> 00:18:34.759
<v Speaker 1>One list holds what felt good or meaningful in the relationship,

306
00:18:35.079 --> 00:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>while the other holds what felt hard or painful. Keeping

307
00:18:38.119 --> 00:18:41.039
<v Speaker 1>them apart lets each side stay exactly as it was,

308
00:18:41.440 --> 00:18:44.759
<v Speaker 1>instead of forcing a single line that smooths over the contradictions.

309
00:18:45.160 --> 00:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Because the earlier section showed how polarized memories can linger,

310
00:18:48.799 --> 00:18:51.079
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense to let the list remain side by

311
00:18:51.160 --> 00:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>side without rushing to connect them. After the lists sit

312
00:18:54.279 --> 00:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>for a day or two, many people notice the urge

313
00:18:57.160 --> 00:19:01.039
<v Speaker 1>to read one list into the other. Tendency is common,

314
00:19:01.319 --> 00:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>yet it often adds pressure rather than relief. Speaking the

315
00:19:05.039 --> 00:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>full contradictory truth out loud to a trusted friend or

316
00:19:08.079 --> 00:19:12.279
<v Speaker 1>therapist can ease that pressure because the words leave the

317
00:19:12.279 --> 00:19:14.839
<v Speaker 1>inside of your head and land in the room where

318
00:19:14.839 --> 00:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>someone else can hold them with you. The act of

319
00:19:17.279 --> 00:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>saying both sides does not resolve anything, but it does

320
00:19:20.839 --> 00:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>let the tension exist without having to be fixed right away.

321
00:19:24.880 --> 00:19:28.319
<v Speaker 1>When grief spikes during an ordinary afternoon or rite before sleep,

322
00:19:28.440 --> 00:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a simple grounding step can help anchor the moment. Name

323
00:19:32.000 --> 00:19:35.279
<v Speaker 1>one true positive fact about the person and one true

324
00:19:35.319 --> 00:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>negative fact without softening either one. The positive might be

325
00:19:39.000 --> 00:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the way they always remembered your favorite meal, while the

326
00:19:41.720 --> 00:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>negative might be the way they dismissed your worries when

327
00:19:44.000 --> 00:19:47.559
<v Speaker 1>you needed support. Stating both facts in the same breath

328
00:19:47.599 --> 00:19:50.319
<v Speaker 1>reminds the mind that the relationship never fit into a

329
00:19:50.359 --> 00:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>single column, and that both columns remain valid. This step

330
00:19:54.200 --> 00:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>takes only a minute, yet it interrupts the poll to

331
00:19:56.720 --> 00:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>rewrite the past into something tidier. The list and the

332
00:20:00.440 --> 00:20:03.039
<v Speaker 1>spoken truth and the paired facts all work in the

333
00:20:03.079 --> 00:20:07.039
<v Speaker 1>same direction because they keep the mixed feelings intact rather

334
00:20:07.079 --> 00:20:10.759
<v Speaker 1>than trimming them down. Since grief rarely moves in a

335
00:20:10.799 --> 00:20:14.039
<v Speaker 1>straight line, these practices give the feelings room to shift

336
00:20:14.079 --> 00:20:17.599
<v Speaker 1>on their own schedule. Some days one list will feel heavier,

337
00:20:17.880 --> 00:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and other days the spoken words will come more easily.

338
00:20:20.880 --> 00:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Yet neither outcome means the process is finished or broken. Meanwhile,

339
00:20:25.279 --> 00:20:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the listener who wrote about their father described how naming

340
00:20:28.680 --> 00:20:32.559
<v Speaker 1>one kind memory and one difficult memory during a family

341
00:20:32.599 --> 00:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>gathering helped them stay present instead of drifting into old arguments.

342
00:20:37.839 --> 00:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>That small act did not change the history, but it

343
00:20:41.039 --> 00:20:44.519
<v Speaker 1>did let the moment stay as it was. In other words,

344
00:20:44.880 --> 00:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the practices stay practical because they ask very little and

345
00:20:48.279 --> 00:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>they promise nothing beyond a steadier place to stand for

346
00:20:51.440 --> 00:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a while. Although these steps can feel awkward at first,

347
00:20:56.000 --> 00:20:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the awkwardness often fades once the lists or the spoken

348
00:20:59.839 --> 00:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>sentences become familiar. The same listener noted that repeating the

349
00:21:04.680 --> 00:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>paired facts out loud to themselves during a drive made

350
00:21:08.079 --> 00:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the spike of grief pass a little sooner on that

351
00:21:10.759 --> 00:21:15.519
<v Speaker 1>particular day. Because each relationship carries its own shape, the

352
00:21:15.559 --> 00:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>same practice lands differently for different people, and that difference

353
00:21:19.400 --> 00:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>itself stays worth noticing. On top of that, the research

354
00:21:23.480 --> 00:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>from Sheer and colleagues, published in the Journal of the

355
00:21:26.160 --> 00:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>American Medical Association in twenty sixteen tracked how polarized memories

356
00:21:31.440 --> 00:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>can stretch the time grief remains sharp. So giving those

357
00:21:34.759 --> 00:21:39.759
<v Speaker 1>memories separate space aligns with what the study observed. The

358
00:21:39.799 --> 00:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>point is not to force the memories together, but to

359
00:21:42.839 --> 00:21:47.279
<v Speaker 1>let them rest where they already live. Ultimately, these practices

360
00:21:47.400 --> 00:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>work best alongside self kindness because the lists and the

361
00:21:51.759 --> 00:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>spoken truth and the paired facts all ask for honesty

362
00:21:56.079 --> 00:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>without demanding perfection. When a day feels too heavy to

363
00:22:00.160 --> 00:22:03.559
<v Speaker 1>open the notebook, the lists can wait, and the spoken

364
00:22:03.640 --> 00:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>words can wait, and the paired facts can wait until

365
00:22:06.680 --> 00:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the next morning or the next week. The complexity of

366
00:22:10.200 --> 00:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the relationship does not disappear. Yet it also does not

367
00:22:14.480 --> 00:22:18.279
<v Speaker 1>have to be carried alone every single moment. We'll take

368
00:22:18.319 --> 00:22:20.799
<v Speaker 1>a short break here so you can sit with whatever

369
00:22:20.880 --> 00:22:23.759
<v Speaker 1>surfaced for you, and when we return we will hear

370
00:22:23.839 --> 00:22:27.039
<v Speaker 1>from more listeners who have carried similar mixtures of memory.

371
00:22:28.039 --> 00:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Feeling relief after a complicated loss does not erase the

372
00:22:32.039 --> 00:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>love you held or the grief that remains, because both

373
00:22:36.559 --> 00:22:39.599
<v Speaker 1>can sit side by side without canceling each other out.

374
00:22:40.440 --> 00:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Many people still question whether that lighter moment somehow makes

375
00:22:44.039 --> 00:22:47.640
<v Speaker 1>their sorrow less real. It does not. The truth is

376
00:22:47.720 --> 00:22:50.759
<v Speaker 1>you can notice space opening up and still miss what

377
00:22:50.960 --> 00:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was lost at the same time. Since the lists you

378
00:22:54.039 --> 00:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>wrote earlier let those separate sides stay visible, you already

379
00:22:57.880 --> 00:23:01.839
<v Speaker 1>have a record that shows complexity does not need fixing. However,

380
00:23:01.920 --> 00:23:04.599
<v Speaker 1>the habit of checking whether the whole story feels correct

381
00:23:04.720 --> 00:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>can creep back in during quiet hours instead of continuing

382
00:23:08.759 --> 00:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that watch, you can let the record stand as it is.

383
00:23:12.400 --> 00:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>The lists already did the work of holding both the

384
00:23:14.720 --> 00:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>affection and the friction without forcing them into one line.

385
00:23:19.039 --> 00:23:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Although self criticism for still noticing the hard parts feels familiar,

386
00:23:23.680 --> 00:23:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it often adds an extra layer of pain that was

387
00:23:26.400 --> 00:23:30.599
<v Speaker 1>never required. While you sort through memories, the inner voice

388
00:23:30.640 --> 00:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>may insist that caring about the difficult pieces means you

389
00:23:33.680 --> 00:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>are doing grief wrong. That judgment rarely helps the process. Therefore,

390
00:23:38.960 --> 00:23:42.319
<v Speaker 1>giving yourself permission to drop the monitoring can ease some

391
00:23:42.440 --> 00:23:45.279
<v Speaker 1>of that added weight. You do not owe the story

392
00:23:45.319 --> 00:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a single consistent shape. Meanwhile, the grounding step you practiced

393
00:23:50.039 --> 00:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>when grief spikes can serve the same purpose. Here, instead

394
00:23:53.640 --> 00:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of turning judgment on yourself, you can return to the

395
00:23:56.519 --> 00:24:01.039
<v Speaker 1>simple fact that the lists keep both truths present. Because

396
00:24:01.079 --> 00:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>self compassion grows through these small, repeated choices, the pressure

397
00:24:05.319 --> 00:24:08.279
<v Speaker 1>to get the narrative right begins to loosen on its

398
00:24:08.319 --> 00:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>own as you keep moving forward. From this point, the

399
00:24:12.160 --> 00:24:14.839
<v Speaker 1>same patience you extend to the memories can stay with

400
00:24:14.920 --> 00:24:18.839
<v Speaker 1>you in ordinary days. The lists, the spoken truths, and

401
00:24:18.880 --> 00:24:22.519
<v Speaker 1>the quiet moments all remain available whenever the mixed feelings return.

402
00:24:23.519 --> 00:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>You do not have to reshape the entire story before

403
00:24:26.400 --> 00:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you let yourself grieve it. The two lists you wrote

404
00:24:29.400 --> 00:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier already show both sides can sit side by side

405
00:24:33.200 --> 00:24:36.880
<v Speaker 1>without one canceling the other. Because grief does not demand

406
00:24:36.920 --> 00:24:39.839
<v Speaker 1>a single, clean version of events, you can keep the

407
00:24:39.880 --> 00:24:44.039
<v Speaker 1>affection and the frustration in the same frame. That choice

408
00:24:44.039 --> 00:24:46.759
<v Speaker 1>matters when the urge to rewrite shows up again during

409
00:24:46.759 --> 00:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>an ordinary afternoon, Instead of pushing one side away, you

410
00:24:50.960 --> 00:24:53.559
<v Speaker 1>can notice the pull and return to the paired facts

411
00:24:53.559 --> 00:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you already recorded. Although it feels unfamiliar at first, carrying

412
00:24:58.039 --> 00:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>both truths forward leaves room for the relationship to stay

413
00:25:01.519 --> 00:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>as it was. Meanwhile, the grounding step you practiced earlier

414
00:25:06.119 --> 00:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>can steady you when the mix of feelings rises right

415
00:25:09.400 --> 00:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>before sleep or during a quiet drive. Since these small

416
00:25:13.720 --> 00:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>anchors do not force resolution, they simply make space for

417
00:25:17.240 --> 00:25:21.079
<v Speaker 1>whatever arrives next. If this podcast helps you make sense

418
00:25:21.119 --> 00:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of your grief, join our supporters club and help us

419
00:25:23.960 --> 00:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>keep these conversations going. You'll find the link in the

420
00:25:27.039 --> 00:25:30.799
<v Speaker 1>episode description. Next time, we will look at how these

421
00:25:30.839 --> 00:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>same mixed memories can shape the way you support someone

422
00:25:34.279 --> 00:25:37.319
<v Speaker 1>else who is grieving. Thank you for staying with the

423
00:25:37.359 --> 00:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>complexity through this episode. This is Dylan and this is grief.

424
00:25:43.079 --> 00:25:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's make sense of this shit
