Speaker 1: New Yorkers Katcha. I'm trying. This is the seventy seven
Speaker 1: WABC Mini Cast, and good evening everyone. It's nine oh five,
Speaker 1: almost nine oh six Eastern time here in the United
Speaker 1: States of America. I'm Jake Novak in for Joe Conscia tonight.
Speaker 1: I would say he's off, but I think that that's
Speaker 1: hard to believe. I can't imagine Joe Kansha taking a
Speaker 1: day off. There's another person on a lot of these
Speaker 1: channels that you listen to, Rita Cosby, same thing. I've
Speaker 1: actually filled in for both of them now, and I
Speaker 1: think it's I think it's a mirage. I don't think
Speaker 1: these people take time off. Joe Conscia's on this radio show,
Speaker 1: He's got the Fox stuff that he does, he's writing books.
Speaker 1: I bet you he's not on a beach somewhere relaxing.
Speaker 1: That's what I'm gonna bet right now. But it's a
Speaker 1: great opportunity. And I do appreciate filling in for Joe.
Speaker 1: I've met him in person and love his work, and
Speaker 1: love his social media messaging too. I don't think I've
Speaker 1: ever seen a tweet or a post of his that
Speaker 1: I didn't like or agree with. Don't always have to
Speaker 1: agree with everything anyone says to admire them and like them.
Speaker 1: It just turns out that I like what he has
Speaker 1: to say. So this is a special honor for me.
Speaker 1: But the bigger honor is being able to talk to you,
Speaker 1: especially because and I've been champing at the bit. And
Speaker 1: by the way, that is the phrase. But unlike a
Speaker 1: lot of the grammar police in the world, I've given
Speaker 1: up on that. It's not chomping on the bit. But
Speaker 1: you can say that now and not get embarrassed. Don't
Speaker 1: worry about it. I'm certainly not gonna call you out.
Speaker 1: But the original term is champing at the bit. But
Speaker 1: I've been very eager, let's put it that way. I'm
Speaker 1: a very eager to try to get this message across
Speaker 1: to It doesn't even have to be the conservative American public,
Speaker 1: just common sense Americans, which I think include conservatives of course,
Speaker 1: about what we're facing as a nation right now in
Speaker 1: the light of these election results. And I'd like to
Speaker 1: save you some time. I'd like to save you some
Speaker 1: brain cells and talk to you about what we're really
Speaker 1: dealing with. I'll power phrase son Sue the great military
Speaker 1: Asian military genius who understood that you have to understand
Speaker 1: your enemy. And I do think that these Democrats, socialists,
Speaker 1: these communist candidates emerging in the Democratic Party are the enemy.
Speaker 1: And I don't mean that just oh, I think they're
Speaker 1: bad people, or I think that they have a bad policy.
Speaker 1: I think that they are funded by encouraged by the
Speaker 1: enemies of this country. You know, it only took a
Speaker 1: couple of generations for the enemies of the United States
Speaker 1: to figure out a way around our campaign finance laws.
Speaker 1: All it's taken is just a little bit of greed
Speaker 1: to corrupt a huge percentage of our country politically, a
Speaker 1: little bit of money here and there. And you know,
Speaker 1: we got lucky in this country because during our longest
Speaker 1: and most dangerous sustained situation with an enemy nation, that
Speaker 1: being the Soviet Union for the fifty years or so
Speaker 1: of the Cold War, the Civic Union had everything almost
Speaker 1: They had great military power, they had great resolve, but
Speaker 1: they didn't have cash flow. They never had the cash
Speaker 1: flow that a China has or even an Iran has
Speaker 1: some of these oil nations, they didn't huge amount of
Speaker 1: the spies and people who were disloyal to the United
Speaker 1: States in favor of the Civic Union, did it for
Speaker 1: ideological reasons? Did it because they were personally compromised. This
Speaker 1: included Britain, including a spy master that had there named
Speaker 1: Kim Philbey, who was compromised because of his sexual orientation.
Speaker 1: It wasn't they, you know. And yes they did pay
Speaker 1: people off sometimes, but they didn't have the option to
Speaker 1: do that as much as China does, and cutter does
Speaker 1: in Iran does, and on and on down the line.
Speaker 1: And that's why we're seeing this. Our campaign finance laws
Speaker 1: have always actually been everything. Have you heard people say, ah,
Speaker 1: there's so much money in politics? Now? There's money has
Speaker 1: always been a huge factor in politics, certainly throughout the
Speaker 1: twentieth and now twenty first century. If you think it's
Speaker 1: a new thing, you know, you need to read a book.
Speaker 1: But I want to talk about specifically now, how you
Speaker 1: need to look at some of these people. How to
Speaker 1: respond to an abdul Siad, how to respond to a
Speaker 1: zoon mom, Donnie, And the most important thing is to
Speaker 1: understand their motivations. I'm seeing a lot of people, good
Speaker 1: colleagues of mine, people who I think are very very smart,
Speaker 1: who respectfully I think are wasting their time trying to
Speaker 1: have an economic argument about the perils and evils of
Speaker 1: socialism and communism by all means, folks, if you want
Speaker 1: to have that conversation with your own children, if you
Speaker 1: would like to do that as a teacher in school,
Speaker 1: please do. We've had a huge drop off in that
Speaker 1: kind of education in this country for a long time.
Speaker 1: It belongs in a classroom. It also belongs as certain
Speaker 1: in public forums. But folks, if you think that Zoorn
Speaker 1: Mamdani and Abdullah said, and all these other democrats socialists
Speaker 1: are actually believing that socialism is a better way to
Speaker 1: get equality and economic happiness in this country. If you
Speaker 1: think that, they close their eyes at night and think,
Speaker 1: if only people listen to my policies, this would be
Speaker 1: a loving, happy place. And they have a dream of
Speaker 1: some kind of you know, the utopian world of people
Speaker 1: skipping in the park, and and and you think that
Speaker 1: that's really what they want, then you don't understand them,
Speaker 1: and you don't understand communism. Communism is actually not an
Speaker 1: economic philosophy. Communism is organized resentment. Communism is about tapping
Speaker 1: into resentment and using it to stoke violence, and using
Speaker 1: it to destroy and undermine civil society. It's not really
Speaker 1: interested in economic equality, which is why talking about how
Speaker 1: communism has never delivered that is a waste of your
Speaker 1: time outside of the classroom and outside of educating your
Speaker 1: own children to waste the time