Speaker 1: Bulls with and it's an It's a book that is
Speaker 1: from the era when Japan was going from like tribal
Speaker 1: chieftains to you know, emperors or whatever or no, excuse me,
Speaker 1: a tribal chieftains to merchant class rule and how a
Speaker 1: lot of the Samurai tried to handle this because it's
Speaker 1: it signified kind of a degenerate stage. If any of
Speaker 1: you watched the recent popular what was that show? I
Speaker 1: just went blank. It's a remake of the seventies Japan
Speaker 1: history show. It was very It was a really well
Speaker 1: done series and I watched all of it. It was just
Speaker 1: on FX or something. It was a really touted series. Showguns,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Vick. Yeah, Showgun was pretty good. I watched
Speaker 1: Showgun and it's kind of that same timeframe of what
Speaker 1: sam is talking about with this this text. I've not
Speaker 1: read this text. It's as new to me. So shout
Speaker 1: out to some of you guys. I'm gonna read some
Speaker 1: super chats in a second. Appreciate that. But again, if
Speaker 1: you go to md dot tv right here, you can
Speaker 1: subscribe and get access to the full shows right there.
Speaker 2: I appreciate that, you guys. He just posted about Jay
Speaker 2: who posted about me? Who are you talking about?
Speaker 1: Jueb Jube? Who are you talking about? Also, by the way,
Speaker 1: you can check out for the live comedy events with
Speaker 1: Sam and the bros Nick and Charles to get tickets
Speaker 1: right here. They just readd the website by the way.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I'm happy to be I'm loving being involved.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's really cool. Oh James White, Okay, I
Speaker 1: don't know. I don't care about names White. I'm going
Speaker 1: to talk about James White here in a minute, and
Speaker 1: all his sassy lisp. I think James White has his
Speaker 1: his bow tie is on a little too tight. I
Speaker 1: don't know if he wears his bow tie a little
Speaker 1: too tight.
Speaker 2: Because it's it's cutting off the circulation and it might
Speaker 2: be causing a little bit of this list. But he's
Speaker 2: got this just so damn sassy. He's just got the
Speaker 2: sassiest little lisp. Are you guys noticing that that sassy
Speaker 2: little lisp?
Speaker 1: Anyway, Look, I would rather be in the circles of
Speaker 1: and writing for Sam Hyde any day of the week
Speaker 1: than in the circles of that goblin, that them sassy
Speaker 1: ass goblin, James White and his demon cult. Uh So,
Speaker 1: let's get over here to that because it's time to
Speaker 1: mention this. So Sam So not Sam Hid. James White,
Speaker 1: as we said, was not interested in any kind of
Speaker 1: debate for the last seven years. I remember trying to
Speaker 1: get a debate with him, argued with him on Twitter,
Speaker 1: I tweitetered at him years ago, twenty seventeen, eighteen somewhere
Speaker 1: in there, and his answer was, I don't have time
Speaker 1: for Orthodox stuff. I don't care about understanding or studying
Speaker 1: Orthodox stuff, and I'm not interested in debating any Orthodox people.
Speaker 1: So that was his stance for six seven years. And
Speaker 1: I specifically asked for I said, less debate. I sent
Speaker 1: center in distinction, less debate, Philly Oakauay and your trinity,
Speaker 1: your ADS doctrine, because he has this a goofy adsview
Speaker 1: bout the way and not interested, not interested. So he
Speaker 1: commented on me once in his one of his videos,
Speaker 1: like five years ago, so he knows who I am.
Speaker 1: But in his comment he's like, is this the jay Dier?
Speaker 1: Is this the jayder As if he doesn't know, like
Speaker 1: which which one I am? So here's my original, here's
Speaker 1: some here's my comments that on this whole stuff. When
Speaker 1: it happened that day. I'm just gonna play this because
Speaker 1: I'm super tired and you can hear what I said,
Speaker 1: and then we'll go to some of his toxic masculinity
Speaker 1: comments where he's showing his masculine prowess with the lispiest
Speaker 1: lisp you've ever heard in your life? Is this gonna play?
Speaker 1: Is this not playing? Maybe this doesn't play if I've
Speaker 1: got all this audio stuff going. I just thought the
Speaker 1: first part about the the sassy pants stuff was funny.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: The reason I'm playing this is because as all this
Speaker 1: was happening, he was on Twitter tweeting at me, and
Speaker 1: I unblocked him for the time being. I didn't block
Speaker 1: him because he mentioned me. I blocked him years ago
Speaker 1: when he was just on a heretical roll, way long ago,
Speaker 1: like six years ago, so he's always been blocked. I
Speaker 1: wanted nothing to do with that, dude. And when everybody
Speaker 1: started messaging James wat's talking about you, James was like,
Speaker 1: I I care, and I'm like, what did he say? Okay,
Speaker 1: so he says, we're gonna read it in a second,
Speaker 1: but I want to play this comment first because this
Speaker 1: is funny. Is there no sound on this thing? I
Speaker 1: attend to a Calvinism. Oh, here we go. I don't
Speaker 1: know why it's not one to play on them. Maybe
Speaker 1: I can find the timestamp here, here we go. So
Speaker 1: here are my thoughts on James White. I got to
Speaker 1: go to two minutes to like three minutes in here.
Speaker 1: Let's see if we can do that. He's over there
Speaker 1: on Flackra welcome.
Speaker 4: I hope everybody from the internet hottest little boat pie
Speaker 4: where I'm talking about that creed death and as soony
Speaker 4: occasionalist Calvinists, Muslim James White.
Speaker 1: And his little cute little list that he's got, he's
Speaker 1: just so in a tesse today. He's just today.
Speaker 2: Something got up under him and got him all sat.
Speaker 2: I don't know what it is. But if we're going
Speaker 2: to go to Romans nine, honey child, he's our man.
Speaker 2: He can exege that perfectly. With that diploma mill degree
Speaker 2: that he got down in South Africa, down there with
Speaker 2: his little ubungoo friends that he's got. I wonder what
Speaker 2: they get up to down there with that little lisp p.
Speaker 2: He's got it and there's no telling them. Maybe he
Speaker 2: did it. Maybe he did his diploma, diploma mill degree online.
Speaker 2: I think they have extension courses up there for little
Speaker 2: James wherever he's located inside his little RV.
Speaker 1: They might be over here in New Orleans right now.
Speaker 2: If it's Marti Grauls time, I'm over here about fifty
Speaker 2: miles out side of New Orleans time. I could just
Speaker 2: run over there and find James if he's over there,
Speaker 2: down in the French quarters. If he's down there, exeget
Speaker 2: and Romans nine for some of the some of the
Speaker 2: men's over there in the French quarters. But listen, I'll
Speaker 2: tell you one thing, honey, you ain't going to find
Speaker 2: a better Cosmu sweater anywhere in the damn us than
Speaker 2: down there in that French quarter. Some of them women's
Speaker 2: down there that does the Tarot reatings, the tar rot cards, Honey,
Speaker 2: of them tarot readers will sew you a Cosby sweater
Speaker 2: like Joseph's technicolor dreamcoat, Honey, out of the doll of
Speaker 2: the Book of Genesis, honey. And that's what James White's
Speaker 2: all about. I hope James White's will come over here
Speaker 2: and I can just talk to him.
Speaker 1: A little bit.
Speaker 2: But he's got that cute little honey. Have you ever
Speaker 2: seen that little Colonel Sanders go to you he's got.
Speaker 2: And it just makes me think all them chickens that
Speaker 2: Biden had just killed, all one hundred and fifty billion
Speaker 2: of them. If I was thinking like James White and
Speaker 2: that Colonel Sanders predepth nation mindset, they was destined for it, Honey,
Speaker 2: all one hundred fifty millions of them. Let's see, maybe
Speaker 2: he'll come in here and tell us about Romans nine.
Speaker 2: Romans nine, I'm just joking, being silly. I'm poisoning the well.
Speaker 2: Oh wait, if I poison the well, it's on Christ.
Speaker 2: Like when James White poisons the well, it's boomer wisdom.
Speaker 1: I don't know what he was trying to say. If
Speaker 1: he doesn't debate a person with a green profile picture, wow,
Speaker 1: those are good reasons. Now, for years, here's the backstory,
Speaker 1: we message James White to do debates on the Essen
Speaker 1: Centers station one simplicity, Okay, all of that stuff, and
Speaker 1: for years he said, yeah, so there's that, and uh,
Speaker 1: here's my thought is, since well, we got to read
Speaker 1: the full quote first before we get into the whole
Speaker 1: Lord of the r V. I mean, it was this
Speaker 1: was just too funny. He says, It's amazing, like the
Speaker 1: out of touch of this kind of a It's like
Speaker 1: he might even be like Elder gen X, but he's
Speaker 1: full boomer. Dude, Like, there's no this dude is full boomer.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna read it in the James White boys, Dude,
Speaker 1: serious inquiry. I'm assuming this is the Jay Dyer who
Speaker 1: has been in numerous religious movements, but most recently anyway Orthodoxy.
Speaker 1: Now keep in mind, James White is not in an
Speaker 1: actual church. He's an independent Baptist with a parachurch ministry.
Speaker 1: And of course all independent Baptists are all lay people anyway,
Speaker 1: who are self ordained. I have to met this is
Speaker 1: this graphic is troubling, so that the first thing that
Speaker 1: he went for was my background graphic. Uh what I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just added, I mean all of things. And the
Speaker 1: background graphic was made by my friend who is a
Speaker 1: professional cinematographer for literally like the biggest people in Hollywood,
Speaker 1: not joking. And if you look closely, it's got a
Speaker 1: lot of lore in it. So there's all kinds of
Speaker 1: lore of my channel, my books, all the very subjects
Speaker 1: that we covered. There's like Claus and people over there,
Speaker 1: there's you know, comedy and movies over here, and you
Speaker 1: know there's a lot of symbolism in it which he
Speaker 1: has no idea what any of that is, Not that
Speaker 1: I would even expect him to. It's just funny that, like,
Speaker 1: just how out of touch and no idea what's going on,
Speaker 1: and he says he has me blocked. I find it
Speaker 1: hard to take him seriously. Well, I wrote that I
Speaker 1: am a comedian, so thank you for not taking me
Speaker 1: too seriously. And you'll notice that Calvinists, by the way,
Speaker 1: all Calvinists care about is being taken serious. They take
Speaker 1: themselves so seriously. All they care about is being seen
Speaker 1: as scholarly and being seen as intellectuals, because that's all
Speaker 1: Calvinism is. It's a religion of worship of the intellect.
Speaker 1: And I mean because the deity of Calvinism is the
Speaker 1: same deity of Islam, who is a direct cause of
Speaker 1: every event, even of the secondary causes. So they might
Speaker 1: as well be occasionalist. They might as well be worshiping Allah.
Speaker 1: And essentially, as I'm told, at least sam Mun points
Speaker 1: out that James White is really friendly with his Muslim friends,
Speaker 1: and that might be because they have much more in
Speaker 1: common than anything to do with Christianity. His description is
Speaker 1: troubling comedian and host of AJ. Well, it's hard for
Speaker 1: older folks to take that seriously. I don't care. Why
Speaker 1: would you take a co edians posts seriously anyway? So
Speaker 1: even that phrase itself, it's hard for me to take
Speaker 1: a comedian seriously. It's like is he writing bad jokes?
Speaker 1: Like does he not understand why that phrase itself is stupid?
Speaker 1: I have responded to mister Dyer in years past. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: then then you're aware of who I am and the
Speaker 1: first sentence doesn't make any sense?
Speaker 5: Is this the U? J?
Speaker 1: Dor Well? I thought you were aware of me from
Speaker 1: the past, so wouldn't you know his attacks on scriptural sufficiency.
Speaker 1: I would like to arrange an in person debate on
Speaker 1: the seventh Ecumenical Council. I mean we asked for many,
Speaker 1: many times emails we haven't sent to the to the
Speaker 1: adjacent Jim's white James, white people like Durban dirt Bin,
Speaker 1: whatever his name is, and the response was one year
Speaker 1: out maybe Well, I wanted to debate the trinity essence
Speaker 1: indistinction ads, these doctrines that Calvinists, to my knowledge, have
Speaker 1: never addressed. Have you ever heard of Calvinists addressed addressed
Speaker 1: the same challenges that I would make to Roman Catholic
Speaker 1: Atomas in Augustinian as a Calvinists ever addressed too. No,
Speaker 1: they don't, And I think that given James White's previous
Speaker 1: admissions of not being aware of Orthodox theology, he knows
Speaker 1: full well that he wants to steer clear of that.
Speaker 1: And so during all of this nonsense, by the way,
Speaker 1: let's finish this, he says, my first question would be location.
Speaker 1: I don't have any idea where he lives. Well, I'm
Speaker 1: not telling you where I live. You don't need to
Speaker 1: know where I live. You're the last person I want,
Speaker 1: and I want to know where I'm located. It would
Speaker 1: uh make it easy to engage in a debate. I'm
Speaker 1: not dumb and not falling for your traps. You're the
Speaker 1: first kind of person that would dog somebody. The earliest
Speaker 1: timeframe I would have would be late November, so basically
Speaker 1: a year out. And then he goes on to talking
Speaker 1: about Orthodox nasty grams. Now, notice how like passive aggressive
Speaker 1: and bad faith this is. He could have sent me
Speaker 1: an email if he wanted to arrange a debate. No,
Speaker 1: he just wanted to drum up some attention and get
Speaker 1: clicks and whatnot. Why, I'm gonna tell you why. And
Speaker 1: that's the key point as to that's what the real
Speaker 1: story of all this is. And it goes back to
Speaker 1: the redeem Zomer debate is part of the whole story
Speaker 1: of this. Now he wants an in person debate. This
Speaker 1: is the funniest part of it. I only traveled via RV,
Speaker 1: which I just thought was funny, like this is just
Speaker 1: just pure boomer, just boomer comedy value, right, So I
Speaker 1: thought that made it right for not just joking about
Speaker 1: the list, because notice he wants to throw under handed
Speaker 1: jabs at me. Oh, I've been in multiple religious movements. Well,
Speaker 1: don't you think probably most of the younger audience that
Speaker 1: you interact with have been in numerous religious movements in
Speaker 1: their lives. And isn't that kind of common now in
Speaker 1: our age?
Speaker 2: I think it is.
Speaker 1: But the Internet is not very friendly to Calvinism. In
Speaker 1: other words, just like Islam, the Internet is not being
Speaker 1: a very good friend to Calvinism, especially when people who
Speaker 1: have been in Calvinism and in Catholicism, like myself, know
Speaker 1: those positions very well from the inside out. I went
Speaker 1: to Bonson seminary and I studied bonds and stuff. I
Speaker 1: don't tout that because it's not an accredited seminary. But
Speaker 1: now keep that accreditation point in mind, because we're gonna
Speaker 1: see some funny things that the Catholics noted about doctor
Speaker 1: James White here in a moment, so I just puted
Speaker 1: it out. You only travel in an RV and my
Speaker 1: background graphic is what you found troubling. It's just okay, Boomer.
Speaker 1: I will only engage you if you wear your Cosby
Speaker 1: sweater and if you can get your lisp under control.
Speaker 1: I have a strict policy of not debating anyone with
Speaker 1: a metrosexual lisp, and you have one of the worst,
Speaker 1: and so if you can get that under control, I
Speaker 1: might think about debating you on the topics that I
Speaker 1: suggested years ago. But by the way, I thought this
Speaker 1: was AI is great for this kind of stuff. So
Speaker 1: after all this comment about his RV traveling, it's like
Speaker 1: this most Boomer thing ever, Doctor James White, be like,
Speaker 1: build me an army worthy of me, right, like soar
Speaker 1: on or something? Right, we got a So this is
Speaker 1: the perfect Calvinists technical or dream code lisp army right here.
Speaker 1: I thought that was some fun AI work and I
Speaker 1: think he made one more comment. I don't know where
Speaker 1: it is, but his other comment was something like, why
Speaker 1: would I respond to a person with a green profile picture?
Speaker 1: So of all the things that again he was looking
Speaker 1: for my PfP being green, that was the thing, Like
Speaker 1: I catch, I can't debate a person on them with
Speaker 1: a green PfP. Solid reasons, solid solid reasons, solid argumentation,
Speaker 1: solid wisdom from thunctor James White. Now, I remember reading
Speaker 1: James White's book, which by the way, has a still
Speaker 1: I don't know if he's fixed it or not. But
Speaker 1: back in around ninety eight ninety nine, I bought Forgotten Trinity,
Speaker 1: and I've covered this before. I don't know if he knows.
Speaker 1: I don't think he does because he doesn't know Trinitarian theology.
Speaker 1: He actually has like two or three heterodox statements about
Speaker 1: the Trinity in his Forgotten Trinity book, so he might
Speaker 1: want to look into that and fix those. But I
Speaker 1: don't think he's be able to fix it with his
Speaker 1: heterodox Latin Augustinian Trinitarian model anyway. And he knows good
Speaker 1: and well he wouldn't last five minutes and debate on
Speaker 1: divine simplicity or the energies or any of that topic,
Speaker 1: Philly oquay, because for him, it's necessary to switch it
Speaker 1: over into debating a year out in an RV where
Speaker 1: he can travel to a location. And I said, look, dude,
Speaker 1: we're gonna we do debates all the time, open for him. Okay,
Speaker 1: So he's tweeting back and forth with me, he's got time,
Speaker 1: he's not busy, And I'm gonna show you that he
Speaker 1: wasn't busy because he went and made an hour long
Speaker 1: video when I was asking him to just come chat. Now,
Speaker 1: if you've been debating Calvinism for thirty damn years, why
Speaker 1: do you need a year prep? Anyway? I don't need
Speaker 1: a year prep. I've never needed a year's prep for
Speaker 1: a debate. The most prep we had was about six
Speaker 1: months for the Jake debate because I was waiting for that.
Speaker 1: Stupid even to me, a translation to come out. Had
Speaker 1: nothing to do with not wanting to debate Jake.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 1: But notice this, so while we were debating, I offered him,
Speaker 1: I just sent him a link right here. Hey, you're
Speaker 1: debating on Twitter about my profile and my character and
Speaker 1: the superiority of your boomer RB lifestyle. And I said,
Speaker 1: stop whining and bitching about You can dish out insults
Speaker 1: and jobs, but you can't take him back when it
Speaker 1: comes back at you. His bio is just weird. He
Speaker 1: has a green faced cartoon background. Now, he wouldn't come
Speaker 1: to the space, so you got time to make What
Speaker 1: does he do during all this? Literally during this he
Speaker 1: goes and makes an hour long video. You could have
Speaker 1: just hopped into space. Why do you need a year
Speaker 1: to talk about? Even if it was the seventh Documentical Council,
Speaker 1: I could have talked to you about that right now.
Speaker 1: We could have talked about any of these topics. So
Speaker 1: and you're gonna say, well, but he deserves a thorable
Speaker 1: who deserves a hoorable debate? Now wait a minute, why
Speaker 1: do I have to immediately cater to his demands? I
Speaker 1: mean my channel has grown bigger than his. I'm not
Speaker 1: looking up to try to get attention and clicks from
Speaker 1: James White, who has I don't know, forty thousand fewer
Speaker 1: followers than we do over here. So I'm supposed to
Speaker 1: just cave to his demands about a boomer RV driving
Speaker 1: like he's going to drive to in his RV only
Speaker 1: if it's close enough. He's probably just looking for where
Speaker 1: I live. Who knows why and which I'm not going
Speaker 1: to tell him where I live. He doesn't need to
Speaker 1: know that. Nobody in this day and age, except for
Speaker 1: a couple people. When it's a high profile person that
Speaker 1: doesn't know, it's just not worth in person debates. You
Speaker 1: can have a online moderated debate and it doesn't take.
Speaker 1: It shouldn't be a year out. So if he's able
Speaker 1: to demand and give terms, why can't I demand and
Speaker 1: give terms? And my terms were come on my x
Speaker 1: space instead of yapping and whining and bitching in all
Speaker 1: of your Twitter comments. But again, remember I know the
Speaker 1: world of Calvinism. I know how these people think. I
Speaker 1: know the whole thing. Calvinists thrive on this. They thrive
Speaker 1: on this kind of stuff because the religion is empty.
Speaker 1: The religion is a god who creates babies to torment.
Speaker 1: It's insane. It's a religion of hate, essentially. And so
Speaker 1: if you wonder why he's known for being a humorless weirdo,
Speaker 1: allow me to explain via his own comments. And I'm
Speaker 1: really glad this went viral because I think this signifies
Speaker 1: the latter stages of James White era. Right, James White
Speaker 1: was at the height of his time in the two thousands,
Speaker 1: and he had turretan fan, he had his little malformed
Speaker 1: minions that tried to debate for him. And we saw
Speaker 1: what happened when turretin Fan tried to debate Sam Chamun.
Speaker 1: It was an absolute massacre. Maybe what a few months ago,
Speaker 1: a year ago, And so it's not looking good for
Speaker 1: the Calvinists on the line. Now getting to my point
Speaker 1: about Redeem Zoomer, why does James White suddenly care about
Speaker 1: what I talk about? He hasn't cared about me for
Speaker 1: seven years, six years, even though I have asked for
Speaker 1: debates in the past. Well, we all know that Redeem
Speaker 1: Zoomer collapsed in our debate, and he's still mad about
Speaker 1: that debate. So we're I don't know, over a year
Speaker 1: out from Redeem Zuomer debate, and the Redeem Zoomer debate
Speaker 1: across multiple platforms has probably two to three hundred thousand views. Okay,
Speaker 1: So this was the rising young star of Calvinism and
Speaker 1: it did not go well for him. In fact, it
Speaker 1: went so bad that he shot down his discord because
Speaker 1: he said he had too many people becoming Orthodox and
Speaker 1: he didn't want his discord to be a mechanism for
Speaker 1: people converting to Orthodoxy, right, and then he says, not
Speaker 1: too long after that, he says, I'm retiring, retiring from apologetics.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna quit. And he had a meltdown after this
Speaker 1: after a debate with me, with my old pushback. It
Speaker 1: wasn't it was a civil discussion. I wasn't mean to him.
Speaker 1: You know what he did immediately after the debate, he
Speaker 1: went on Twitter whined and cried that I was mean
Speaker 1: to him. I'm not joking. He later retracted that and said, Okay, no,
Speaker 1: I just wasn't prepared. It was supposed to not be
Speaker 1: a debate. I mean, I'm sorry. I don't really see
Speaker 1: a big difference between what we had as a discussion
Speaker 1: and an informal debate essentially the same thing. Kyle wasn't
Speaker 1: really a moderator. He was just sort of facilitating a conversation.
Speaker 1: But people cannot handle pushback, especially from gen Z, and
Speaker 1: people have been beginning, they've been noticing this. There's a
Speaker 1: whole conversation on Twitter today about this. Like gen Z
Speaker 1: people just like they think that if you get if
Speaker 1: they get any pushback, they scream and cry and think
Speaker 1: that you hate them. It's really weird. So they don't
Speaker 1: have the capability of dealing with good faith disagreements and exchanges.
Speaker 1: Everything is just hyper extreme emotionalism. But just on these
Speaker 1: two channels here, and there's other channels. There's other channels
Speaker 1: with thirty fifty sixty thousand views, So there's three hundred
Speaker 1: thousand views on this debate on Calvinism, which universally the
Speaker 1: comments are ninety nine percent that rz was just demoliged
Speaker 1: and this is what led him to a year of
Speaker 1: angry tweeting about orthodoxy and retiring from doing apologetics. So
Speaker 1: we helped to retire Readeem Zimmer. And it's not all
Speaker 1: about being mean. All this stuff like Calvinism is a
Speaker 1: serious error. It's a serious heresy, and the people who
Speaker 1: have locked themselves into it and double down and double
Speaker 1: down and double down become like their deity. It is
Speaker 1: not bad or wrong to strongly oppose and even mock
Speaker 1: these heresiarchs. James White is one of the foremost heresiarchs
Speaker 1: of our day. He is a new Nestorius and you
Speaker 1: can guaran damntee it. If any Church father were present,
Speaker 1: he would be called the new Nestorius and if you
Speaker 1: doubt me on that, let's take a look at what
Speaker 1: James White says about the actual bishops and saints of
Speaker 1: the Early Church. This will help you understand the level
Speaker 1: of just garbage that this person is. This is one
Speaker 1: of the most arrogant, disgusting people of our day. And
Speaker 1: I'm going to show you that that's the case. And
Speaker 1: this is great because if we have these kinds of
Speaker 1: I mean, he just looks like a little he looks
Speaker 1: like a little munchkin, like a little like who's the
Speaker 1: Lucky Charms dude? Like if the Lucky Charms dude were
Speaker 1: mixed with Colonel Sanders, you would get out of that
Speaker 1: union between the two, if they had a love child,
Speaker 1: you would get James White. He looks like a little munchkin,
Speaker 1: Lucky Charms. You know, give me me gold, give me
Speaker 1: me predestined gold.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 1: But I'm going to show you that James White is
Speaker 1: not a good faith debater. He's not a serious person. Yes,
Speaker 1: the comedian man is going to demonstrate to you this
Speaker 1: is the irony. The James White is the real comedian,
Speaker 1: the real world clown. And this went viral. It's maybe
Speaker 1: up to three hundred thousand I don't even there's other
Speaker 1: clips as well of this debate. Whoever this? I think
Speaker 1: this guy's Catholic? Here where when James White encounters problematic
Speaker 1: material for his position, suddenly, like the Muslims, he becomes
Speaker 1: a higher critical textual scholar.
Speaker 7: But two things, if we have what ignacious rope there?
Speaker 7: Since I was the seminary and I'm not sure if
Speaker 7: you're aware of this, over the past twenty five years,
Speaker 7: there has been a tremendous amount of skepticism, uh, scholarly skepticism. Okay,
Speaker 7: let's make sure we don't.
Speaker 1: There we go.
Speaker 7: The light's back the light, the light came back on.
Speaker 7: There has been a tremendous amount of scholarly skepticism expressed
Speaker 7: as to whether ignacious even existed and which letters are
Speaker 7: actually because there's a Latin and there's a shorter, and
Speaker 7: there's a I was not taught that, but I'm sort
Speaker 7: of catching up with that.
Speaker 8: So it's so that's so, I hope, so oh so
Speaker 8: that that that sassy little list, where's that sisy little
Speaker 8: list coming from?
Speaker 3: I just.
Speaker 1: Just something lit a fire under him today and he
Speaker 1: was just own it, honey, Sassin with that little bow tie.
Speaker 7: Like that I hope. I hope it's becoming the central view.
Speaker 7: I hope.
Speaker 1: So it's the central view from the liberal higher critics
Speaker 1: that exist. Just maybe he just didn't even he wasn't
Speaker 1: even a thang, Honey, he just wasn't even a thang. Now,
Speaker 1: I again know the mind of Calvinists, and the best
Speaker 1: way to deal with Calvinists is to not take them seriously,
Speaker 1: because the one thing a Calvinist wants more than anything
Speaker 1: is to be taken intellectually serious, and to make fun
Speaker 1: of these people as they should be made fun of,
Speaker 1: because James White's the actual clown here. They eventually reveal
Speaker 1: themselves and let's see how many how many views does
Speaker 1: this thing have? What I'm getting at? Long story short,
Speaker 1: this is the end of Calvinism. The Internet is the
Speaker 1: end of Colvinism, just like it's becoming the bane of Islam.
Speaker 1: Islam could only thrive when people didn't have access to real,
Speaker 1: significant challenges to the position, real competent people who could
Speaker 1: debate this.
Speaker 2: So look at this two hundred and this is a
Speaker 2: quarter million views just on this cradcat profile, And if
Speaker 2: you search this clip, it's all over many channels and
Speaker 2: it's going to be all over many more channels. And
Speaker 2: if you remember the trent Horn debate, James White lost
Speaker 2: the trent Horn debate. James White lost so bad that
Speaker 2: he actually just had the resort to saying, well, the
Speaker 2: papacy is blessing you know, skittles unions, which.
Speaker 1: James, with that lisp, you would do well in Rome.
Speaker 1: Maybe you should think about converting to Rome after all
Speaker 1: these years. If they're blessing gay unions, it might be
Speaker 1: up your alley. So the best thing to do with
Speaker 1: Calvinists is to actually not take them seriously. And no,
Speaker 1: I would never be even in the same room as
Speaker 1: James White. I think this person is just absolutely disgusting.
Speaker 1: Now he said all the same stuff about me, so
Speaker 1: it's fine. I don't even care. I actually think it's
Speaker 1: funny that this guy is so troubled and miserable, and
Speaker 1: that Calvinism will make you miserable, just as miserable as
Speaker 1: radical trad tomism will make you miserable. He's miserable because
Speaker 1: it's a religion of dead works, the very thing that
Speaker 1: they're always talking about. But everyone else, it's a religion
Speaker 1: of weird phariseeism. It's more akin to Islam, and it
Speaker 1: might you know, who knows. Maybe we'll see James White
Speaker 1: become Muslim in a few years. I mean, he likes
Speaker 1: to buddy up to the creeper Muslims, so maybe that's
Speaker 1: where he's gonna go. Now, one last thing about James
Speaker 1: White before we move on. OK, and this is what
Speaker 1: the Catholics have been saying about James White for a while.
Speaker 1: And by the way, if you're looking for a theological refutation,
Speaker 1: we've already done that. Many people have called into question
Speaker 1: his degree. One of whom is the the Catholic writer
Speaker 1: Dave Armstrong.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and Jane.
Speaker 1: Dave Armstrong is the chief critic in this regard in
Speaker 1: terms of Whites questionable seminary. I will give you the
Speaker 1: link right here. You can go read what Dave Armstrong says. Uh,
Speaker 1: there's there's so many pop ups on his freaking blog
Speaker 1: that I can't even open these pages. All right, So
Speaker 1: he says, I said, out of this controversy about anti
Speaker 1: Catholic Baptist apologist James White's doctorate. But it has been
Speaker 1: pointed out by several folks that if a person hasn't
Speaker 1: really earned their doctorate degree with the usual amount of
Speaker 1: work required in most legitimate institutions of higher learning. This
Speaker 1: in effect cheapens the achievements of those with real degrees.
Speaker 1: And so it's a question of him boosting his own
Speaker 1: so called credentials. And of all people, Mormons did a
Speaker 1: deep dive I guess into his background because he makes
Speaker 1: a lot of arguments against Mormons, and Dave Armstrong says,
Speaker 1: we don't want to commit the genetic fallacy. He says
Speaker 1: that White claims to have earned a degree. A THHD
Speaker 1: a scholarly historical information Exchange for Latter day Saints page
Speaker 1: has says that does White have a genuine doctorate? It
Speaker 1: links to James White's defense of himself. And the first
Speaker 1: point is that this degree I found the web archive pages.
Speaker 1: This isn't I think it's an It looks like an
Speaker 1: online thing.
Speaker 2: Maybe they had a building at some point, but this
Speaker 2: you have to go back in the way back machine
Speaker 2: because it doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: But it was called Columbia Evangelical. And who is the
Speaker 1: quoted promoter on the first page, Why it's James White.
Speaker 1: So the endorsement for the online degree that is not
Speaker 1: accredited is James White himself, who gives it a full endorsement,
Speaker 1: and then there's a bunch of other expert PhD evangelical
Speaker 1: goofballs on here. Now, on one level, I don't care
Speaker 1: about this stuff, which is why I don't talk about
Speaker 1: there's not really any point in higher education anyway these days.
Speaker 1: But because this is an older Gen X Boomer era person,
Speaker 1: for those people in their mindset, this really matters, and
Speaker 1: you are not a scholar if you don't have if
Speaker 1: you do not have the proper credentials. We're moving into
Speaker 1: a world where that doesn't matter. It already doesn't matter,
Speaker 1: and nobody else is going to care about that. And
Speaker 1: when these people pass away, which probably won't be much
Speaker 1: longer because probably a lot of these people are normans
Speaker 1: about medicine, it's sure as hell won't matter. So you
Speaker 1: can go Dave Armstrong's questioning of the background.
Speaker 6: Of the man who.
Speaker 1: Literally says in the debate, current scholars say ignacious might
Speaker 1: not have existed. Oh you mean, like current scholars who
Speaker 1: say that the Bible is a bunch of fantasies and myths.
Speaker 1: Those current scholars, Oh you mean, like the current scholars
Speaker 1: that Muslims point to, like bart Erman, that you reject
Speaker 1: when it's a debate with a Muslim, but now you
Speaker 1: use them when ignacious is a problem for your Baptist theology.
Speaker 1: The reason Calvinism is dying and your ministry is fading,
Speaker 1: James White, is because it's not true. It's because the
Speaker 1: Baptist faith is not the faith of Christians of the
Speaker 1: first millennium. And we all know that. That's why. It's
Speaker 1: because you're wrong. That's why Calvinism is not doing well
Speaker 1: on the internet, James, That's why. And I do not
Speaker 1: respect James White or any of these people. And I
Speaker 1: don't because that game is not gonna work with me.
Speaker 1: These people are not respectful people. They don't respect me.
Speaker 1: They're not going to respect anyone of our ilk. And
Speaker 1: I'm not a young man anymore. You're not gonna pull
Speaker 1: rank on me as if I'm supposed to respect your
Speaker 1: made up Baptist ordination and whatever. This is universal life
Speaker 1: church degree. And I don't care about your degrees anyway,
Speaker 1: because accreditation ultimately even that even that doesn't matter, I
Speaker 1: mean to the boomer mindset, because they think there's some
Speaker 1: authority behind that. But accreditation is a state thing anyway.
Speaker 1: And so the iron is that he was looking for
Speaker 1: accreditation for this whatever this thing is. When the boomer
Speaker 1: mindset that he has is locked into a system that
Speaker 1: they don't even realize, it doesn't matter anymore. They're legacy
Speaker 1: boomer people that are not in touch. And that's why
Speaker 1: when he came to my profile, it's all Chinese to him.
Speaker 1: It's like he doesn't it's no idea. You guys have
Speaker 1: been really generous tonight. I appreciate that we got some
Speaker 1: really fat super chats. Jordan Flores twenty dollars. Do you
Speaker 1: ever dabble in Cosby sweater? Dark arts? You mean the
Speaker 1: feeble fobble deebel dabble some of that feeble fobble dizzle dazzle,
Speaker 1: You bet I do, baby, Jordan Flor's one hundred dollars,
Speaker 1: What is your epistemic justification for a gay lisp and
Speaker 1: a Cosby sweater? It's the feeble fabble, feeble fabble, That's
Speaker 1: what it is.
Speaker 2: Jordan Flores another one hundred dollars latch and then it's
Speaker 2: he has a milk with a chicken chicken milk laugh.
Speaker 2: I don't know what that means, but I like it.
Speaker 2: Groove Monster nineteen ninety two, ten dollars. Here's another book
Speaker 2: recommendation b berg People, Elite Power and Consensus by Ian Richardson. Ooh,
Speaker 2: that's well, if it's a Rutledge, then it's an academic publication.
Speaker 1: So I do want to get that because, as you
Speaker 1: guys know, contrary to boomers who like to laugh at
Speaker 1: Lord Voldemort, what we do on my channel is actually
Speaker 1: cover elite establishment books and documents. And that's why what
Speaker 1: we do is way more powerful than any of the
Speaker 1: connique con people scam people. Do you think these people
Speaker 1: read books. They don't read books. That's what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about that pudding pop calvinism. Baby, I'm talking
Speaker 1: about that five point pudding pop. I'm talking about five
Speaker 1: pop Calvinism right there, feeble thiblet zebel zebow. That's what
Speaker 1: I'm talking about. Now, if you're looking for a theological
Speaker 1: critique of.
Speaker 2: This sassy pants man over here, the sassy If y'all
Speaker 2: want to get a little sassy with him, you.
Speaker 1: Can come over to my member's page or assume in
Speaker 1: my posts. Come over here to the post right here,
Speaker 1: and three four years ago, over sixty thousand views, we
Speaker 1: refuted James White back then about Cosby sweater Calvinism in
Speaker 1: this open forum is a lot of fun four hour
Speaker 1: stream back here, so you can go make use of
Speaker 1: that if you're looking for some more sassy pants reputations
Speaker 1: and what is this over here? Oh yeah, then there's
Speaker 1: other people critiquing him about his claims about himself. Whatever.
Speaker 1: I don't care about him. I'm not even going to
Speaker 1: be interacting with this person ever. I mean, what does
Speaker 1: scripture says to reject the heretic after the first and
Speaker 1: second ammunition? So there you go, Jay, read your superchets.
Speaker 1: I'm reading super chats. I just read like several of them.
Speaker 1: Let's see demon Nut demon Nut two dollars debate Vegan gains.
Speaker 1: Let him join on veganism. I love you, you're hot,
Speaker 1: but Protestantism is going to the Lake of Lava. Well,
Speaker 1: I hope you're not a dude calling me hot because
Speaker 1: that's a little weird. Okay, you need to maybe get
Speaker 1: over there in the Alpha Omega Ministries chat. If you're
Speaker 1: going to be doing that kind of lispy stuff, you
Speaker 1: and the wrong chat son, No, I will always forever
Speaker 1: just make fun of these people like James White. I'm
Speaker 1: not going to have as an actual one year out
Speaker 1: RV meet up, an RV meet up with James White
Speaker 1: or you must be joking. Now, we got two different
Speaker 1: lists of super chats, so relax, I'm gonna do him.
Speaker 1: Jordan Flores sens another one hundred dollars. Well, y'all being
Speaker 1: so generous, thank you. Jordan Flores is gonna take the record.
Speaker 2: I think the record is like four or five hundred
Speaker 2: dollars super chat, but Jordan Flores is already three hundred.
Speaker 1: Deep killing it. He says, Jay, I missed you. We
Speaker 1: missed you too. No skittles. I didn't think it was skittles, dog,
Speaker 1: but I appreciate that, y'all being two generous. We've got
Speaker 1: turpentine cat. He's on a new member, jennif Ferguson chad
Speaker 1: nerd members.
Speaker 3: What's up?
Speaker 1: Shout out to you guys. So we already debated Vegan
Speaker 1: gains No. I noticed that, like Vegan Gaines's last live
Speaker 1: streams are premieres, he had like sixty people in there. Okay,
Speaker 1: nobody cares about veganism, just like nobody cares about Calvinism,
Speaker 1: and even fewer people will care about Calvinism in five years.
Speaker 1: We will continue to convert people to thedoxy and this
Speaker 1: dumb sect will die out on its own and he
Speaker 1: can go drive off into the sunset.
Speaker 6: In his RV.
Speaker 1: No, we don't have to, we don't. You don't even
Speaker 1: have to do these engagements like it's not even necessary.
Speaker 1: You understand that Calvinism is collapsing itself, just like Islam
Speaker 1: is not doing well on the internet. And I've already
Speaker 1: debated Vegan Gains. Why why do I need to do
Speaker 1: the same debate or do you think do you think
Speaker 1: Vegan Gains is going to do any better than the
Speaker 1: same debate we already did. He's just looking for attention
Speaker 1: in some way to get people on his dumbass death
Speaker 1: diet channel. We already debated Vegan Gains. See a lot
Speaker 1: of the boomer gen Z types. They don't realize that
Speaker 1: the rest of the the Internet world doesn't care about
Speaker 1: the things that their era cared about. They don't care
Speaker 1: about the degrees, they don't care about your boring shitty books.
Speaker 1: Look fifty one thousand views. We already debate the Vegan
Speaker 1: Gains and this is one of the most laughable clown
Speaker 1: troop debates that we've ever had. No there's no need
Speaker 1: to do this same discussion over again. Who's going crazy?
Speaker 1: What are you guys even talking about. I would love
Speaker 1: to debate Paul Washer and outcry him, but I don't
Speaker 1: think Paul Washer. I've never seen him do a debate.
Speaker 1: In fact, the one time that he welcomed the debate,
Speaker 1: he threw me out for asking the questions that he
Speaker 1: said you could do. So I asked him questions about
Speaker 1: tradition and the cannon, and he had me physically escorted
Speaker 1: with two redneck dudes out of the church. So that's
Speaker 1: the kind of people, dude. That's how fragile these people are.
Speaker 3: Dude.
Speaker 1: Look, I'm the kind of person that if somebody challenged
Speaker 1: me in a setting like that and we got into
Speaker 1: a debate, I'm gonna debate you. I'm not gonna have
Speaker 1: two fat, redneg dudes physically remove you. I mean, unless
Speaker 1: you're acting crazy. But I wasn't acting crazy. I just
Speaker 1: asked him questions, which he welcomed. Paul Washer was.
Speaker 9: Like, friends, I want to invite any of you if
Speaker 9: you think you can grab that Bible over there, and
Speaker 9: if you think you can question me from that Bible
Speaker 9: over there on much stand friends, I welcome it because
Speaker 9: I want to be corrected by the word of God,
Speaker 9: and by Gosh Golly, I will cry on cue at
Speaker 9: twenty three minutes forty three seconds every sermon, right do,
Speaker 9: because it's the spirit of what moving me.
Speaker 1: These people are ridiculous, like actually starting to think that
Speaker 1: there's the Calvinist people and they're leaders. There's something wrong
Speaker 1: with them, Like they're messed up, something's wrong.
Speaker 10: I mean, they're like, yes, God creates babies to tarbid them.
Speaker 11: That is our sovereign Lord.
Speaker 1: We love him. I mean, they're like proto Satanists. So
Speaker 1: why would a proto almost Satanist.
Speaker 6: Not be a.
Speaker 1: Scammer? Now speaking of proto Satanist or actual Satanist church scammers,
Speaker 1: other parachurch ministers have been in the news this week
Speaker 1: with some pretty mind blowing stuff. By the way, I
Speaker 1: was happy to see Tim Gordon admit JP two was
Speaker 1: a feminist. Now wait a minute, I thought feminism is
Speaker 1: the cancer of Western civilization. It's an attack on the patriarchy.
Speaker 1: But doesn't your church dogmatically think he's a saint. How
Speaker 1: is a saint a promoter of the cancer and destruction
Speaker 1: of Western civilization? Hm okay At what point do we
Speaker 1: just realize, ok Ay, Rome lost the faith. Like it's
Speaker 1: not hard to figure out. By the way, this is
Speaker 1: James White in his RV on his way to your town.
Speaker 1: One year out. You've got one year. You better lock
Speaker 1: up your Cosby sweaters and you better wear some glasses
Speaker 1: because the spit, the spit flying off of that lisp.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not gonna say, but I've heard the
Speaker 1: spit coming off of that list. It's kind of like
Speaker 1: xenomorph fluids. You don't want that in your eyes, so
Speaker 1: be sure. And where your sunglasses when the RV rolls
Speaker 1: into town?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 1: Where is this crazy story of this megachurch man? Oh,
Speaker 1: here we go. Gateway Church founder megachurch man Robert Morris
Speaker 1: indicted on five counts of child s charges. Forty three
Speaker 1: years later the law caught up with him. Now this
Speaker 1: sounds a lot like a show that we've covered. Why
Speaker 1: it sounds like Reverend Tuttle from Season one of True Detectives.
Speaker 1: Isn't it interesting? That's exactly what it is. And of
Speaker 1: course I couldn't resist that connection. And as our boy
Speaker 1: Matthew right there, see as little Matthew McConaughey's over here
Speaker 1: colin out than fake creatures. So, mister Turtle, Reverend Tuttle,
Speaker 1: I just want to I just want to point out
Speaker 1: he might just be a demon possessed PDF. Is that true?
Speaker 1: Is that right? Is that all right?
Speaker 6: Uh?
Speaker 3: This is.
Speaker 1: Twenty four billion lost in climate change funds that the
Speaker 1: World Bank doesn't know what happened to it? Oh my bad, dude.
Speaker 1: A hey, sorry, man, I just I had that twenty
Speaker 1: four billion, bro, And uh, I don't know where I'll
Speaker 1: put that, man, I'm sorry. Uh, but listen, could I
Speaker 1: get a little more tax money?
Speaker 6: Bro?
Speaker 1: Could y'all just give me a little bit more tax money?
Speaker 1: Mane Man, I'll promise this time I will not lose it.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna put it right here in my pocket. Why
Speaker 1: does he Why does he do all these weird voices?
Speaker 3: Though?
Speaker 1: When have I not done weird voices? And why are
Speaker 1: you even here? I think we got a Calvinist on
Speaker 1: our hands. The weird voice was Matthew McConaughey from the
Speaker 1: show Dummy. Goodbye? What's this weird booth? We got a
Speaker 1: boomer boomer alert A little reminder because people still don't
Speaker 1: know this, A little bit of a reminder.
Speaker 12: Zub dollars would be spent on LSD research at universities
Speaker 12: throughout the country. That word would begin to spread on
Speaker 12: campus about this so called mind blowing drug, and suddenly
Speaker 12: it was the counterculture of the sixties.
Speaker 3: I gave the CIA a total credit for sponsoring and
Speaker 3: initiating the entire consciousness movement counterculture events of the nineteen sixties.
Speaker 1: Just a little refresher. Now this is interesting too. I
Speaker 1: wanted to missing this. Well, got wrong, Paul, Well, well
Speaker 1: wrong on the fan. Well think, wait on to the
Speaker 1: Fand I'm just kidding. I'm impersonating Ron Paul with an
Speaker 1: extreme excessive impersonation for fun. But this is interesting because
Speaker 1: this comment that he mentions was in Wiki Leaks was
Speaker 1: actually in Ostrovsky's nineteen ninety and nineteen ninety four book
Speaker 1: which I've been reading. So the whole history of the
Speaker 1: moss Ad that Ostrovsky writes about.
Speaker 12: In the history, you will find out that Hamas was
Speaker 12: encouraged and really started by Israel because.
Speaker 10: They wanted Hamas to coteract Yair Arafat.
Speaker 1: And I just read this in Ostrovsky's Bote Now the
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety edition. By way of Deception does not explicitly
Speaker 1: mention hamas it mentions the funding and creation of rival
Speaker 1: groups to the PLO. Now, I'm not saying that Asser Arafat,
Speaker 1: Yasser Arafat and the PLO were like necessarily the good guys.
Speaker 1: That's a whole complex, tricky situation. But I've been doing
Speaker 1: a lot of research on this whole domain because this
Speaker 1: plays into obviously all the stuff that's going on right
Speaker 1: now with what happened in Syria. It's you know, we
Speaker 1: wrote a lot about this ten years ago with Patrick
Speaker 1: Henningson when I was writing for twenty one Wire and
Speaker 1: we were covering what we now know of as Operation
Speaker 1: Timber Sycamore. So we were talking and writing about this
Speaker 1: at the time twenty fourteen, fifteen, sixteen seventeen, and it
Speaker 1: was declassified later actually pretty recently that the plan was
Speaker 1: called Timber Sycamore, use Radical Islam to topp a Lasad. Hello.
Speaker 2: I wrote about that, talked about that as it was
Speaker 2: going on, as I got called every name in the
Speaker 2: book throughout that time period, and once again I'm right,
Speaker 2: and have any has anyone said, oh yeah, by the way,
Speaker 2: sorry for calling you Temple hat From twenty fourteen, fifteen, sixteen,
Speaker 2: seventeen eighteen, because you were actually right about all that.
Speaker 1: Do you know how many debates I had with boomers,
Speaker 1: internet idiots all over the place weather the West and
Speaker 1: its allies were funding Al Nusra and radical Islam. Toho
Speaker 1: helped top Alasad, many.
Speaker 11: Many, including idiot family members. This is public knowledge.
Speaker 1: In the New York Times twenty seventeen, a one billion
Speaker 1: dollar secret CIA war in Syria to top of a
Speaker 1: SAD funding who Syrian rebels? All Who's that it's not
Speaker 1: moderate Islam? So here's New York Times declassified in twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen telling you what we said in twenty fourteen. Where's
Speaker 1: the you were right? Oh? Good job. Do you want
Speaker 1: me to show you what we were talking about? You
Speaker 1: can go listen to the old podcast back back at
Speaker 1: the time. I did a podcast on NATO and Syria
Speaker 1: right around this time when this was declassified. It's called
Speaker 1: Timber Sycamore. The reason that I knew this was happening,
Speaker 1: and I don't know remember who first mentioned it. It
Speaker 1: could have been it could have been Patrick, it could
Speaker 1: have been Lord Voldemort. I honestly don't recall. But the
Speaker 1: Council on Foreign Relations had a page up where one
Speaker 1: of their writers was calling fora CIA and Western support
Speaker 1: for radical Islam. It was called something like it's time
Speaker 1: for it's time to fund al Qaeda in Syria, or
Speaker 1: isis in Syria, something like that. It was some title
Speaker 1: like that, and that has been pulled. You can still
Speaker 1: see it in one of my old videos because I
Speaker 1: showed the CFR article in one of my old videos,
Speaker 1: and that CFR article has been pulled. It's not there anymore.
Speaker 1: But it doesn't matter anyway because Timber Sycamore has been declassified.
Speaker 1: Let's see. I think there was one other clip I
Speaker 1: was looking for. Oh, here's just a little interlude for
Speaker 1: you guys. It's in a reading rainbow rainbow, so just
Speaker 1: a little bit of peaceful mood music. Well, Emmanuel becomes
Speaker 1: a member for a month again hauling the goods and
Speaker 1: becomes a member. Welcome everybody, Jay Lama twenty bucks wearing
Speaker 1: that Nero shirt means that you're in support of Milo
Speaker 1: right Love you is a techno ban and the Nero
Speaker 1: dude was liking my Instagram posts, which made me happy
Speaker 1: because they're one of my favorite DJ combo with the
Speaker 1: Chick singer outfit. So Nero has been one of my
Speaker 1: favorite Edim troops for since about twenty fourteen, so we're
Speaker 1: coming up with ten years of Nero. Has nothing to
Speaker 1: do with my little Anapolis contrarian one dollar. Do you
Speaker 1: have any thoughts on Santy Nation's Church in Franklin, Tennessee.
Speaker 1: I've not been. I've been there once since the older
Speaker 1: era of the previous priest, who I guess has retired,
Speaker 1: so I've never met the priest, but we have friends
Speaker 1: that go there, so definitely, if that's the closest church,
Speaker 1: you check it out. Jordan Johnson, how do I find
Speaker 1: your discord? I am in a discord that I gave
Speaker 1: to other people and it's the largest Orthodox discord server
Speaker 1: and basically FDA runs that. I post my posts in there,
Speaker 1: but I do not spend a lot of time in there.
Speaker 1: Don't have time for discord BMX nineteen six sixteen bucks.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, Nicholasville five dollars. Jay out here
Speaker 1: strapped up for real? Well, I mean we've got a
Speaker 1: crazy week, so I mean, have you not heard what's
Speaker 1: happening in the news this week? Bulpus five dollars.
Speaker 2: I'm humbly begging for an entire stream in a Terrence mckinnavoy.
Speaker 2: For five dollars, you get one mushroom surprise underneath your
Speaker 2: pillow tonight. When you eat that mushroom, you will dream
Speaker 2: of a sassy, fancy Pence pants men giving you a
Speaker 2: little massage.
Speaker 1: How's that that's all you get for five buck? You
Speaker 1: don't get a whole stream for five bucks, dude, a
Speaker 1: lula five dollars. I'm a little depressed when you don't stream.
Speaker 1: You're actually my favorite white boy. You're my favorite white boy,
Speaker 1: white boy. White. You have to say it like that,
Speaker 1: Who are my favorite white boy? I guess? So does
Speaker 1: that mean that you're a non and white? Oh, you
Speaker 1: could be a white You could be a white dude
Speaker 1: saying that I'm your favorite white boy, which is a
Speaker 1: little weird. But you could be a white girl saying
Speaker 1: that I'm your favorite white dude. Either way, even if
Speaker 1: you are a person of African descent, I'm glad, in
Speaker 1: honored to be your favorite white boy. Jordan flor Is
Speaker 1: another one hundred dollars. Damn day, dame, four hundred dollars.
Speaker 1: Jordan Floyd's trying to take the record tonight Now, we
Speaker 1: had that guy who's an actor. I don't know his
Speaker 1: real name, but he was on my riz stream. He
Speaker 1: sent four hundred dollars. That might be that might be
Speaker 1: the limit or there. Maybe there was a dude years
Speaker 1: ago that sent five hundred dollars at some point I
Speaker 1: don't remember. I don't even know what the roe. There
Speaker 1: might be a limit. I don't even know there's a
Speaker 1: limit on there, but uh, looks like Jordan and Flora's
Speaker 1: gonna take it. Find a man in the French quarter
Speaker 1: extra dating Romans nine.
Speaker 10: There's a sassy little man in the French Quarter and
Speaker 10: he's gonna do Exagesi's on Romans nine, haities undead ten dollars.
Speaker 1: Jay Dyer is listening to Jay Dyer. This is j septionin.
Speaker 1: I just watched your video on sassy Why. It's a
Speaker 1: ten out of ten stream and I would recommend it
Speaker 1: to anybody who is inquiring about penal substitutionary atonement and
Speaker 1: other kooky Calvinists. Sesy little pants and a cessy little
Speaker 1: man sess in his way, dude downtown.
Speaker 10: Yeah, sessy little man with a sessy little ass and
Speaker 10: is sessae in his way too?
Speaker 1: Downtown. Yeah, let's pull that up.
Speaker 10: Presassination before the Foundations of the Earthy, I was presassinated,
Speaker 10: just presassinated.
Speaker 1: Here is the link to that classic stream. These streams
Speaker 1: just ended up being a classic somehow. I don't even
Speaker 1: know what's going on. Nathan Slippery, christ Is King, christ
Speaker 1: Is God Ken your Kenes became a member. What's up, dude,
Speaker 1: Jordan Johnson ten dollars discard? We already read that. Hesher Mcsheshington.
Speaker 1: Shout out to Hesher five bucks. And if you guys
Speaker 1: didn't catch it, we did boiler Room last night.
Speaker 2: My mind is potato milkshake, mush. Let's still hold on.
Speaker 2: Let's come over here to to rock Fin.
Speaker 1: By the way, if you're not subscribed over here on
Speaker 1: rock Fin, you can find me on the rock right here,
Speaker 1: great free speech based platform. Here's the link right here.
Speaker 1: And many of our esteemed friends and colleagues are also
Speaker 1: found over here. I'm gonna give them a shout out
Speaker 1: and a promo right here. You're listening to the boiler Room,
Speaker 1: so here is boiler Room. Be sure and follow boiler
Speaker 1: Room right here. And we might have we might have
Speaker 1: been on YouTube last night. I'm not actually sure if
Speaker 1: we are on YouTube, let me.
Speaker 2: See things have you know, lightened up a bit, so
Speaker 2: it's nice to be able to have these conversations. Okay,
Speaker 2: here we go, ACR, Yes, here we go. So last
Speaker 2: night's be boiler room. Here's boiler room over here on YouTube.
Speaker 2: So we did do it was on YouTube last night.
Speaker 2: You can check it out right there.
Speaker 1: Shout out to ACR, zalmoxist ten dollars. Jay. Doesn't James
Speaker 1: White know that twenty twenty five is the year of love?
Speaker 1: I love your stream and I appreciate your work. Well
Speaker 1: maybe they heard me say that. That's why they want
Speaker 1: to try to set up a fake debate. Since I
Speaker 1: said it's a year of love, they know I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to I'm not trying to have formal debates. The
Speaker 1: main reason that I didn't want to do the formal
Speaker 1: debates wasn't really anything about James White. It was because
Speaker 1: I was trying to finish Esotery Holy with three and
Speaker 1: I didn't know how long it was going to take
Speaker 1: to finish Hollywood three. But because we got stuck in
Speaker 1: the house basically when it was super cold. You can
Speaker 1: go anywhere at our other place that gave me the
Speaker 1: time to finish Esoteric Hollywood three, so thank God has done.
Speaker 1: Maybe it'll be out soon. We'll see. That's up to
Speaker 1: the publisher. But he did send me the rough cut
Speaker 1: and it looks great, very happy. I think it's going
Speaker 1: to be a bomb. Bigody, Baby Archville, ten dollars, Jay,
Speaker 1: bless you, God, bless you. Lifelong Baptist. Is my understanding
Speaker 1: of the Trinity as Father's only spirit, distinct person's in one,
Speaker 1: not the same trying in God asking as a slow boy. Well,
Speaker 1: it's not so much that the phrase is false, because
Speaker 1: I mean, I think even a Orman could say, well,
Speaker 1: I believe in Father, Son, Holy Spirit as distinct persons.
Speaker 1: Maybe they wouldn't say they would say one. But you know,
Speaker 1: Orthodox Trinitarian theology is the Trinitarian theology of the first
Speaker 1: thousand years, because the Phillyoquay addition doesn't become dominant until
Speaker 1: after the schism, and so the monarchical Trinitarian mindset is
Speaker 1: the norm, and that's what's dogmatized at the Second Ecumenical Council.
Speaker 1: Second Ecumenical Council dogmatizes the Cappadocian doctrine of the Trinity,
Speaker 1: which is not the Philly Oquay Trinity. And as far
Speaker 1: as I know, every Baptist I've ever heard of believes
Speaker 1: in the Philly Oquay. So I would say, look at
Speaker 1: doctor bo Branson's lectures on the monarch on monarchical trinitarianism. Now,
Speaker 1: if monarchical trinitarianism ends up being true and no Baptist
Speaker 1: teaches that, don't play the game of well, I'm going
Speaker 1: to a Baptist who believes in monarchical trinitarianism. That's not
Speaker 1: gonna work because number one, you're going against all the
Speaker 1: other confessions and history of London Baptist Confession, all of that.
Speaker 1: And if the Orthodox Church is the only one that
Speaker 1: maintains the monarchical trinitarian teaching, because Rome im sure doesn't,
Speaker 1: then how many does that leave you, dude, that the
Speaker 1: Orthodox is the only one left, that means it's the
Speaker 1: true church. Caromaggio twenty dollars, Lol, Thank you so much, dude.
Speaker 1: Caromaggio one gifted a membership vain two dollars. He's been
Speaker 1: living in a van down by the river, throwing in
Speaker 1: a little Chris Farley for that R and V that
Speaker 1: RB life zalmoxis five dollars Jay, say the Sha receive
Speaker 1: legal imputation from Allah. It makes sense that Calvinists were
Speaker 1: also iconic class, of course it does. Allah is the
Speaker 1: demon god of the Calvinists. Vane five dollars, James Yaka
Speaker 1: Reformed of Rumor. It's getting crazy out here, Raynocerist twenty bucks. Jay,
Speaker 1: Did you see that Patrick bet David interviewed the Ben
Speaker 1: and Jerry guy. He went on where on one hand,
Speaker 1: Homie wanted freedom and on the other hand he's afraid
Speaker 1: of ideas. I could use some knockcage on the as
Speaker 1: end of a Friday mad respect when we knew the
Speaker 1: thing about Patrick but David? Is that Patrick David trying
Speaker 1: to be in this weird stage of his life where
Speaker 1: he's like trying to make a lot of money, but
Speaker 1: he's also trying to be beije. But he's also going
Speaker 1: to be a YouTuber. He's sort of a silver tongued
Speaker 1: car salesman in my view. How's that? Chul Skins eight bucks?
Speaker 1: Do you have any debates coming up?
Speaker 6: Oh?
Speaker 1: What am I I'm forgetting the biggest damn news of
Speaker 1: the year on my channel. I already forgot this. Yes,
Speaker 1: this is what I meant to say, this is the
Speaker 1: other thing happening. The reason that I forgot, or that
Speaker 1: I the other reason for not setting up this stupid
Speaker 1: debate is that we're trying to set up right now,
Speaker 1: the Tim cast debate, which will be fifty times bigger
Speaker 1: than anything these goofballs want to do. So Tim Poole
Speaker 1: posted where is it at? I got to scroll back
Speaker 1: to it. He said, Catholicism is the superior Christianity. And
Speaker 1: of course this provoked an infinity of replies, where.
Speaker 3: Is it at?
Speaker 1: Butterfly in the sky looking for twice? Says high take
Speaker 1: a look Si book reading rainbow. Here we go. I
Speaker 1: can't go, good grace, man, how long ago was this?
Speaker 1: You can tell we've been driving in the car because
Speaker 1: there's a million tweets and retweets over here. Where's it at?
Speaker 6: Man?
Speaker 1: Anyway, it got a lot of retweets wherever it is?
Speaker 1: And so I said, here it is Temple has agreed
Speaker 1: to not Tim himself. Well, no, Tim agree to it.
Speaker 1: But so after he said, uh, Catholicism is superior or whatever,
Speaker 1: I said, would you like to debate this? Tim? And
Speaker 1: that got a lot of replies and retweets, And then
Speaker 1: I started talking to Tim's scheduler, and it was somehow
Speaker 1: somebody suggests Michael Knowles. I don't remember who. Now, we
Speaker 1: don't think Michael Knowles will do it. However, my idea was,
Speaker 1: since Tim Gordon is friends with Michael Knowles, if Tim
Speaker 1: Gordon is there, Michael Knowles will be more likely to
Speaker 1: do it. And maybe Tim Poole and Tim Gordon can
Speaker 1: get Michael Knowles to come and do this debate. And
Speaker 1: that all sounded great and everything sounded cool, and that
Speaker 1: was like exactly what we were looking for. And then
Speaker 1: I forget who. Somebody was like, oh, I got to
Speaker 1: bring into Protestants, get the Protestants on there too. But
Speaker 1: the problem is that when you get these panels of
Speaker 1: like six people, two Protestants, two Romancolics, too orthodox. Now
Speaker 1: it's gonna be like just everybody yappy, right, It's gonna
Speaker 1: be overly yappy. But it's not my show. I can't
Speaker 1: determine any of that. So my suggestion was Wes Huff
Speaker 1: and whoever else they want. Now somebody said, oh, Doug
Speaker 1: Wilson wants to come on in debate. I'm not a
Speaker 1: huge fan of Doug Wilson either, so I don't know
Speaker 1: if I mean Doug Wilson and James White are like
Speaker 1: Boomer yesteryear, you know, go retire and play your banjo
Speaker 1: or whatever it is you do. I think it would
Speaker 1: be more it would be a better discussion, It would
Speaker 1: be more relevant if it was the younger people, like
Speaker 1: all of the people suggested, like wes Huff, Me, Knowles
Speaker 1: and Gordon and then whoever else. I don't know who
Speaker 1: the other person would be. They might they might be Andrew.
Speaker 1: I just don't know. So the timcast scheduler woman is
Speaker 1: trying to get all this settled, and somebody reached out
Speaker 1: to me. Who is wes Huff's friend who is interested
Speaker 1: in Orthodoxy? Not wes Huff the friend, And so he
Speaker 1: thinks he can kind of get Wes also, So there
Speaker 1: we go. Doug couldn't beat Hitchens. I totally disagree. I
Speaker 1: think I'm not even a fan of Doug Wilson. But
Speaker 1: he did a presuppositional critique of Hitchens and won debate.
Speaker 1: Wes Watson, if you ain't Rich ripped and where where where?
Speaker 1: Mother freaker? I don't want to see your ass? How's that?
Speaker 1: I debate that? That's why I'm saying Michael Knowles would
Speaker 1: only be willing if Tim Gordon is there as this
Speaker 1: sort of you know, philosophical backup. But chances are it'll
Speaker 1: be it may just be me Tim Gordon in West
Speaker 1: Huff or me Tim Gordon and you know Doug Wilson,
Speaker 1: Brendan b ten dollars. There's a Reform Baptist video. It's
Speaker 1: getting some attention. Eight concerns of Eastern Orthodoxy. So look, guys,
Speaker 1: look this will be a great video for you, you
Speaker 1: to refuse with your Eastern Orthodoxy. Al the Cross of
Speaker 1: Pensacola is the channel. So look, guys, every few months
Speaker 1: somebody sends a video of hey, this is going around.
Speaker 1: It's the eight reasons I'm not Orthodox, it's the five
Speaker 1: reasons Catholicism's true. It's this, this, this, And I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to be rude or mean to you. Every time
Speaker 1: these are the videos that go around like this. They're
Speaker 1: always the lowest tier arguments that have been addressed ad infinitum.
Speaker 1: They've been addressed a zillion times. And I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to be mean or rude to you, but I guarantee
Speaker 1: you that whatever's in that video, my channel has addressed
Speaker 1: it at least one hundred times. Guys. Remember, we've had
Speaker 1: open debate since twenty eighteen, regularly with probably thousands of
Speaker 1: hours now because sometimes we've gone from anywhere from anywhere
Speaker 1: from two to six hours since twenty maybe even twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: So I know that it's not fun to but like,
Speaker 1: it's very draining and taxing for me to have the
Speaker 1: same debate over and over and over, which is like,
Speaker 1: why does James White want to have the same canon
Speaker 1: debate that he's been having since the nineties, especially given
Speaker 1: that did you guys listen to the Trent Horne James
Speaker 1: White debate? Like, I mean, I don't even think Tren
Speaker 1: Horn is pretty low tier. Honestly, Trent Horn still thinks
Speaker 1: that the word triad is an anti Trinitarian term, even
Speaker 1: though it's the very term used in his Eastern Catholic
Speaker 1: churches for the Trinity. So I'm more interested in this debate.
Speaker 1: I don't care about James White. I'm aiming up Son,
Speaker 1: I'm not aiming dow And to hammer home this absurdity.
Speaker 1: I'm glad to see Roman Catholics such as this goober
Speaker 1: openly moving in the direction of Islam slash Judaism, exactly
Speaker 1: as their popes and Vatican two have done. See, this
Speaker 1: is the thing with these heterodox delusions, especially the delusion
Speaker 1: that natural theology and the Old Testament teaching unitarianism is
Speaker 1: somehow going to get you somewhere, especially in the confrontation
Speaker 1: with Rabbinic philosophy and theology or Muslim philosophy and theology.
Speaker 1: You see, the last six years of debating Muslims has
Speaker 1: taught us the absolutely essential doctrine of the Trinity in
Speaker 1: the Old Testament, and obviously than the Angel of the
Speaker 1: Lord necess Saly being the Logos, the Son of God.
Speaker 1: Now some people get tripped up on this because there's
Speaker 1: passages where in the presence of the Logos there's also
Speaker 1: angels present. So the fact that angels are present in
Speaker 1: the Angel of the Lord Theophanes does not exclude the
Speaker 1: presence of the Angel of the Lord Allah Exodus three
Speaker 1: and Exodus twenty three, which identifies that angel as the
Speaker 1: one who can pardon sins, so not a created being.
Speaker 1: And also in many passages called identically Yahweh Gideon, it
Speaker 1: says Yahweh turned his face to Gideon. What angel that's
Speaker 1: a created being is the face of Yahweh. So Roman
Speaker 1: Catholics are in delusion to the extent that much like
Speaker 1: their heterodox BFF buddies, the Jews and the Muslims, they
Speaker 1: can't and don't believe that the Old Testament Angel of
Speaker 1: the Lord, even though we've lectured through all those passages
Speaker 1: which absolutely identify him as Jesus. Jesus himself identifies the
Speaker 1: Angel of the Lord in the Old Testament as himself.
Speaker 1: The idiot heterodox Thomas cult is busy undercutting the best
Speaker 1: proofs that Christianity is true to Muslims and Jews. And
Speaker 1: why do they do that? Because they're in delusion. They
Speaker 1: don't have the Trinity, and they're following their papal synagogue
Speaker 1: master who tells them that Muslims adore that's a term
Speaker 1: related to worship the same God as the Christians. They
Speaker 1: submit to God. They have the faith just as Abraham had.
Speaker 1: No Muslims do not have the faith of Abraham. Abraham
Speaker 1: ate with Christ. Jesus says Abraham believed in Christ. Unitarianism
Speaker 1: is not the theology of the Old Testament. And because
Speaker 1: if Unitarianism is not the Old Testament, that means only
Speaker 1: Orthodoxy has maintained this because this is dogma. In Vatican Two.
Speaker 1: Nostra Atat is promulgated for the entire Romancholic Church. It
Speaker 1: is expected to be believed. There's no place or position
Speaker 1: ever in anything people teaching since Vatican Two that gives
Speaker 1: you any room to reject or deny this. In fact,
Speaker 1: Francis creates the Abu Dhabi Multi Faith Center on the
Speaker 1: very principle of atat and the idea that Jews, Christians,
Speaker 1: and Muslims all worship the same Unitarian deity. And this
Speaker 1: is why Trent Horne is unfortunately a Trinitarian heretic. He
Speaker 1: also doesn't believe that the Old Testament teaches the Trinity.
Speaker 1: As he mentioned in our debate, the Old Testament allah
Speaker 1: natural theology in Vatican two is a Unitarian generic God
Speaker 1: and Jesus is the revelation of the Trinity. And these
Speaker 1: idiotic Roman Catholic minds, this is how stupid this is.
Speaker 1: So give it time and these people, much like James White,
Speaker 1: will move to Islam because they don't even understand and
Speaker 1: see yet that their position is actually what the Muslims
Speaker 1: and the Jews argue. Imagine undercutting your best argument against Muslims.
Speaker 1: That's how stupid these people are. But heresy makes you stupid.
Speaker 1: And there's no worse heresy than denying or messing up
Speaker 1: on the Trinity. But that's exactly what these people do.
Speaker 1: There's no anyone familiar with Galatians Galatians three John five
Speaker 1: through nine would ever think that Muslims have the faith
Speaker 1: of Abraham and worship and Adorre are the same God
Speaker 1: as we do. And poor sam Chimun having to grapple
Speaker 1: with this, and I know because I grapple with it,
Speaker 1: it's a difficult thing. Sam Schimun is gonna have to learn.
Speaker 1: You don't go to Rome and pick and choose the
Speaker 1: dogmas and documents that you want. And let me tell
Speaker 1: you what happens when you do. You'll go to Rome.
Speaker 1: You'll think I can pick and choose. In a few
Speaker 1: years you'll realize I'm not actually allowed to do that.
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna go to the Latin Mass Society's FSSP
Speaker 1: SSP instead of a contest, and you're gonna see that
Speaker 1: they're insane and they deny Vatican One. And I'll show
Speaker 1: you all the places in Vatican one to they deny.
Speaker 1: We've covered it fifty times on this channel. There are
Speaker 1: four or five places in Denzinger that tell you you
Speaker 1: have to accept it all. You don't get to pick
Speaker 1: and choose, even if it's fallible. Ordinary people teaching you
Speaker 1: are expected to accept it with docility. And I even
Speaker 1: I didn't even I didn't even know until the other
Speaker 1: day that the new canon law even restates that principle.
Speaker 1: I think it's seven ninety two. Let's see if it's
Speaker 1: seven ninety two. No, they'll just say, what do you
Speaker 1: what the fold of the canon wall. I'll get the
Speaker 1: pick of choose. No you don't. Oh, that's not it.
Speaker 1: No way, I want eight No, I want seven ninety two,
Speaker 1: not eight hundred.
Speaker 3: What is this?
Speaker 1: Why besides broke, I ain't working. Let's see seven ninety two.
Speaker 1: Let's see. Maybe this is it.
Speaker 6: That's not it.
Speaker 1: I just posted it to some goober tradcat. Let's see
Speaker 1: if I put in my bookmarks. So the five places
Speaker 1: in Denzinger are eighteen thirty, sixteen eighty three, seventeen twenty two,
Speaker 1: seventeen ninety two, and then hang on, I lost the
Speaker 1: canon law reference. It's somewhere on my wall, though. Does
Speaker 1: anybody have their handy, it's like maybe seven thirty two.
Speaker 1: It's seven hundred something.
Speaker 6: I know that much.
Speaker 1: Chelseky in eight bucks, do you have any debates coming up? Again?
Speaker 1: We're trying to organize this three way Roman Catholic Orthodox
Speaker 1: Protestant debate. I'm tired of debating all this. It's the
Speaker 1: same debate over.
Speaker 5: No and over.
Speaker 1: Like, guys, don't you realize, like imagine debating the same
Speaker 1: thing since two thousand and two or three, So twenty two,
Speaker 1: twenty five years of this is getting old. Marcus v.
Speaker 1: Ten Bucks. I don't because you don't really hear new arguments, man,
Speaker 1: like whether it's Calvinists or whether it's papists. I mean
Speaker 1: maybe every now and then a papist can come up
Speaker 1: with some kind of creative argument. I'll go, there's some
Speaker 1: credit Like every now and then papists come up with
Speaker 1: some kind of.
Speaker 13: Oh wait, I put let me see, I put this
Speaker 13: in the discord chat. I think that might be an
Speaker 13: easy place to find this. Let's say scroll back. This
Speaker 13: kind of stuff drives me crazy until I fund it.
Speaker 13: Let's see, Oh here we go, Oh here we go.
Speaker 1: Found it. It's seven point fifty two. Excuse me, I
Speaker 1: was close although not an assent of faith. So no,
Speaker 1: that's when it's something dogmatic, right, So that would be
Speaker 1: extraordinary magisterium or universal ordinary magisterium. Those two require a
Speaker 1: sent of faith, a religious submission of intellect and will
Speaker 1: must be given to a doctrine of the Supreme Pontiff
Speaker 1: or the College of Bishops concerning faith or morals when
Speaker 1: they exercise authentic magisterium, even if it's not definitive magisterium.
Speaker 1: Do you see that? So is the Roman Catholic attitude,
Speaker 1: according to your canon law actually supposed to be you
Speaker 1: judging when the pope is faithful to tradition or not.
Speaker 1: Is that what that sounds like to you? And yet
Speaker 1: every Roman Catholic trad literally operates the exact opposite of
Speaker 1: what this canon says. That's their canon law.
Speaker 11: The kids are the film.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, so here we go. This is how this works. Anyway.
Speaker 1: I'm so tired of this. This debates are so old
Speaker 1: and so stupid. They're the same old debates. And I
Speaker 1: know a lot of you are new, but guys, we
Speaker 1: got fourteen hundred videos on this channel, fourteen hundred live streams.
Speaker 1: Everything I'll bring up, we've addressed it. Mark goes five
Speaker 1: twenty dollars. Have you ever addressed seven day Adventism first time? Here?
Speaker 1: Your music choices are sick. I mean, you know, if
Speaker 1: you look at the canon of Scripture, I mean that
Speaker 1: cuts out all the Protestants. If the canon of Scripture
Speaker 1: is not right in the Protestant world, and if tradition
Speaker 1: is true, that out goes all the Protestant stuff. And
Speaker 1: by the way, the arguments for the finality of divine
Speaker 1: revelation and the closing of the cannon in the sense
Speaker 1: of there's no new public divine revelations after the death apostles,
Speaker 1: then Ellen White is not a prophet because Ellen White
Speaker 1: was a kind of charismatic, So that would be an
Speaker 1: end to Seven day Adventism. Josiah Aliron twenty dollars. I
Speaker 1: was formerly Catholic, but now I'm Orthodox due to you.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, man, Santos Jimenez, twenty dollars. May
Speaker 1: God protect you and guide you.
Speaker 11: Brother.
Speaker 1: May the fruits and the spirit be in abundance, and
Speaker 1: keep up the informative content. That was not me farting.
Speaker 1: By the way, that's my foot fart from sitting on
Speaker 1: this chair, which gets really sweaty. Was that an uncreative
Speaker 1: foot fart. I'm mute, dude, Brendan b five dollars, think
Speaker 1: you so much. Jordern Flores has taken the cake. He
Speaker 1: sent five hundred dollars in super Jets tonight. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much. Man, you're being way too generous. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: I never met a Calvinist who wasn't elect you know,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't. I wouldn't say that this is a godly movie. However,
Speaker 1: I would say that the Vivivich again, it's it's unfortunately
Speaker 1: a kind of a witchcraftish movie. However, the Vavovich is
Speaker 1: a pretty good critique of Calvinism. Now, I'm not saying
Speaker 1: that you should go to the conclusions of this movie
Speaker 1: when Anya Taylor Joy is inducted into the coven. But
Speaker 1: the part of the point of this movie is that
Speaker 1: the riggers and absurdity of the Puritan worldview that's actually
Speaker 1: what leads her to the witch team. So, in other words,
Speaker 1: you know, you hear me saying a lot like Evangelicalism, Protestantism,
Speaker 1: these things, these are atheism factories. Puritanism. Puritanism is an
Speaker 1: atheistm factory. In fact, we probably wouldn't have the extreme
Speaker 1: opposites that we have in America today, This pendulum swing
Speaker 1: from the time of the Puritans to America now being
Speaker 1: like transskittals Heaven or whatever it is hell whole. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're going like it's like full Hell Raiser, right, it's
Speaker 1: full lament cube configuration being opened.
Speaker 2: We have such sites to show you, uh so, but
Speaker 2: I would I would say, you wanna you want a
Speaker 2: good movie that critiques Calvinism, but I wish There are
Speaker 2: not many.
Speaker 1: There are very few. I can't even think of any others.
Speaker 1: But watch the Bitch. Watch Anya Taylor Joy over here
Speaker 1: in her journey into witchcraft because the horrors of the
Speaker 1: cult of Calvinism. Basically, I think like Anya Taylor Joy
Speaker 1: just realizes that, oh, I'm already worshiping Black Philip and Calvinism.
Speaker 1: Like the demon god of Calvinism is the god that
Speaker 1: I'm already worshiping. So why not be a witch? Here's
Speaker 1: some money for your foot fart? Lit you rhythm, Thank
Speaker 1: you so much.
Speaker 3: Man.
Speaker 1: Y'all have seen me explain and demonstrate the foot fart
Speaker 1: many many times. Are farts a result of the fall? No,
Speaker 1: because there's an uncreated eternal footfart at the base of
Speaker 1: Allah's throne. Boomer Slayer fifty Canadian? Is that a loony
Speaker 1: or a tuny? Thank you so much, dude, appreciate that
Speaker 1: ryannoceras five dollars. I want to start a Lerch appreciation
Speaker 1: Society in honor of Kissinger's wife. May God help us.
Speaker 6: Uh.
Speaker 1: I think I remember people making fun of Mama Kissinger.
Speaker 1: But I'm guessing she's not a hottie. She had nine
Speaker 1: or a ten. I think I looked at a picture
Speaker 1: of her one time, but I don't remember what she
Speaker 1: looked like. She looked like a bch. Let's see what's
Speaker 1: the Mama Kissinger looking like? Alert? She said, is Kissinger's
Speaker 1: wife still alive? Whoa nancy? Damn? Dude? Is Kissinger like
Speaker 1: four feet tall? Or is she like eight feet tall?
Speaker 2: The kiss them are don't marry to Innernaki, bro kiss
Speaker 2: them are don't marry ananaki due.
Speaker 1: By the way, the vich is pretty good, No seratu
Speaker 1: not so good. I do not recommend those farautu. I
Speaker 1: do recommend the witch. I'm not saying Witchcraft's good, but
Speaker 1: I'm saying, like uh, Greek letters for five debate Albright
Speaker 1: I don't want to not in shit. They will school
Speaker 1: you on the papacy.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Sure, you're the dummy that just gave me five dollars, uh,
Speaker 1: saying that my apologetics is dying. You just gave money
Speaker 1: to By the way, in canon law and traditional Roman
Speaker 1: Catholic thought, wouldn't that make you a falter of heretics?
Speaker 1: So if you're giving me money, that makes you a
Speaker 1: falter of heretics. Christ is like two dollars, Hey, day Gyre.
Speaker 1: There's a person in the chat named day Gyre, So
Speaker 1: I don't know if you're talking to them or me.
Speaker 1: Let your rhythm. Two dollars, here's some money. No, we
Speaker 1: already read that, porthodox boomer Grandma twenty dollars, Jay, I
Speaker 1: love your recent content. Good Linton struggles to you and Jamie,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. Appreciate that. That's really kind. Ze
Speaker 1: Marx's twenty bucks. What is up with judaic hamartiology or
Speaker 1: Doctrine of Sin? Where Dennis Prager goes on with poets
Speaker 1: with a quartus it says that wanking spanking to corn
Speaker 1: of youth. I've got to figure out how code this
Speaker 1: is technically not a not a shame because not a
Speaker 1: thing because children are not harmed. Well, I mean, doesn't
Speaker 1: it sound like what Gesus says about the ethics and
Speaker 1: morals of the Pharisees. What did you expect, Thomas B.
Speaker 1: Ten dollars? How does christis in human nature redeem everyone's nature?
Speaker 1: Because it's universal human nature. So read Mansarides's essay, Jesus
Speaker 1: Christ universal person. That's why all men are resurrected on
Speaker 1: the basis of Jesus, who has a particular body. It's
Speaker 1: not just a particular body. He actually assumed universal human
Speaker 1: nature to recapitulate what Adam destroyed in our nature. So
Speaker 1: just as Adam's death reaches everyone, Christ's resurrection reaches everyone.
Speaker 1: And that's also a refutation of Calvinism, because in Calvinism
Speaker 1: there's no reason for the reprobate to be resurrected other
Speaker 1: than just arbitrary mud. Twenty bucks.
Speaker 2: Did you see the jay video by Westford? Mister Westward,
Speaker 2: it's funny in honor now, I'm not sure what that is.
Speaker 2: And honor Gene Hackman in the State was a pivotal
Speaker 2: moment in my life when I was eight or nine.
Speaker 1: I never trusted three letter agencies. From then on, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a good movie. And uh, I would say it's yeah,
Speaker 1: it's like geared towards inculcating skepticism about that. So I
Speaker 1: agree with that. Job gifts the membership. Josiah A. Leron
Speaker 1: gifts memberships and gives more. Job gives more. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to make sure I hit all these or so many
Speaker 1: Theology Explorer check my message under previous streams. Okay, I'll
Speaker 1: try to find them. Christ's Life two dollars, raid yas. Yeah,
Speaker 1: hey j Dyer in reverse, let's see make sure I
Speaker 1: got all the there's more. We're over here, so let
Speaker 1: me let me see Jane Melson's twenty bucks. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much, man, glitch your rhythm. Two dollars. Here's some
Speaker 1: money for that foot fard. I we already read that. Now, guys,
Speaker 1: you all know that we have show sponsors, and the
Speaker 1: best sponsor imaginable is the best in supplementation, especially for
Speaker 1: all you theology nerds. A lot of y'all boys are soymen.
Speaker 1: A lot of y'all got that SaaS in your pants
Speaker 1: and that SaaS in your mouth, that little lispilisp like
Speaker 1: doctor White. Well, you need to get rid of that
Speaker 1: and one way to get rid of that is Chalk
Speaker 1: dot com. Head it over to Chalk dot com and
Speaker 1: combat your soy mentality with male vitality. That's right. This
Speaker 1: is excellent material and excellent stuff to combat your your
Speaker 1: soy self and to promote your toxic masculinity through especially
Speaker 1: the Tonk catalite, which is proven healthy hormone metabolism increases
Speaker 1: physical mental energy twenty clinical studies. You can actually go
Speaker 1: read the peer review studies over here that this boost testosterone.
Speaker 1: There's also the Chalk Daily Oshauwa Ganda is great as well.
Speaker 1: So all of these are great for a regular workout,
Speaker 1: gym regimen and a good diet. And if you combine
Speaker 1: all these you're good, dude. Now it is not one
Speaker 1: twenty two. You actually get a big discount off of
Speaker 1: that if you use a promo code JA y four
Speaker 1: four Life J forty four Life JAY four four li E.
Speaker 1: Now you can unsubscribe at any time, but I guarantee
Speaker 1: you if you do this, you're gonna want it coming
Speaker 1: on the regular. And Chalk is a great company. They're
Speaker 1: very easy to deal with. Their products are really high quality.
Speaker 1: They're very stringent about the purity requires for their products.
Speaker 1: And if you don't want to recurrent subscription, you just
Speaker 1: want to test it at one time. You see that
Speaker 1: by one time one, ay two. You don't do that,
Speaker 1: you get Jay four zero and you get forty percent
Speaker 1: off of this stack. Now it's not just for dudes.
Speaker 1: There's also the female vitality. It's a little bit of
Speaker 1: a different combination, but it's a combination that's very applicable
Speaker 1: to the female biology. Yes, there are female biologies and
Speaker 1: male biologies. They're not interchangeable. They're unique and non transferable.
Speaker 1: So head on over to chalk dot com. I don't
Speaker 1: know why this is freezing up, and use these promo
Speaker 1: codes as I recommended, and you're going to be doing
Speaker 1: it right with your boy Billy course and over here
Speaker 1: your boy billy course, with your boy Billy course. I
Speaker 1: think it's funny when people come over here or they
Speaker 1: hear me talking about stuff, or they hear me making voices,
Speaker 1: or they hear me doing impressions, or they see like
Speaker 1: the cringe core music, or they come over here and
Speaker 1: they see funny pictures and it just blows their mind
Speaker 1: and they always think that like I'm crazy or something
Speaker 1: like that, and they don't realize that it's a lot
Speaker 1: of it's just inside jokes, dude, it's a lot of
Speaker 1: like lore that we've got unique to our channel over here.
Speaker 1: You know, we're not insane. We know what we're talking about.
Speaker 1: Let's see zalmoxists five bucks. Well, Candice debate the entire
Speaker 1: Daily Wire. Supposedly there's some lore about that where she
Speaker 1: can't talk about it for legal reasons. But I don't
Speaker 1: think anybody's gonna debate over there. No, as far as
Speaker 1: I understand, it doesn't look like there's gonna be any debates.
Speaker 1: Brady Chandler, five bucks. The Angel Lord said, I the
Speaker 1: God of Bethel. Yeah, I know. I mean, there are
Speaker 1: multiple passages and we've lectured through. We did all of
Speaker 1: the Torah passages about the Angel of the Lord, and
Speaker 1: Jacob uses the trifle parallel blessing of Yahweah Yahweh Angel
Speaker 1: Genesis same as Genesis forty eight to deny this is
Speaker 1: Jesus insane. Yeah, Thomas are insane, So what do you expect?
Speaker 1: John One says that Jesus is the latter that Jacob
Speaker 1: was wrestling with. Yeah, I know that. You think, do
Speaker 1: you think these guys they don't read the Bible. Thomas
Speaker 1: know nothing about the Bible. All they do is read
Speaker 1: their skidt OL's philosophy. Man, I don't care about what
Speaker 1: you're talking about. Hey Jay, Hey dire Jay, Hey day Jay, Higher,
Speaker 1: Christ's Life, Christ's Life, Thank you so much, Black Pillar.
Speaker 1: Ten Darson to ten ten dollars for Billy Carson. I
Speaker 1: want to hear some Billy corson. I don't even I mean,
Speaker 1: he doesn't even really talk like that. It's just it's
Speaker 1: just funny to pretend that he talks that way. I
Speaker 1: don't know. There's so many super chats like coming in
Speaker 1: it's hard for me to even catch them all. Dude,
Speaker 1: you guys are being too too generous. Let's say there's
Speaker 1: another one I missed over here about something Joey Valencia too.
Speaker 1: We need a gay Dier versus gay list James White. Hmm.
Speaker 1: You might can set that up with like a like
Speaker 1: an AI. That'd be funny to have like a like
Speaker 1: a AI, a gay ie version of me debating his
Speaker 1: that'd be funny. Okay, Now, this is what everybody's talking
Speaker 1: about today, and Pasobiac and Candace and JBP and Cernovich
Speaker 1: and all of the twitters are tweeting about it, and
Speaker 1: it's about Christ the King. Now, when this was a
Speaker 1: big hub of a year ago, we covered this in
Speaker 1: two live streams that were both long, one with my
Speaker 1: one just me, and the one with Tim Gordon, and
Speaker 1: we talked about how and what the phrase crisis King means.
Speaker 1: So I'm not gonna repeat all that. You can go
Speaker 1: watch that for the theology of it. But Prosobiac Pasobiac
Speaker 1: is Jack Postsobiac is talking about the person behind this
Speaker 1: paper that or this essay co written with Peterson and
Speaker 1: some other person from the ADL, and that the one
Speaker 1: and behind this research group is a far left open
Speaker 1: society Rutger's establishment Soros thing, and that to me is
Speaker 1: a pretty important point about this paper. Now. It is true, however,
Speaker 1: I will agree with Peterson to this extent that I
Speaker 1: do think that they want to exacerbate and give the
Speaker 1: place for extremists, like real extremist positions to come up
Speaker 1: to the foe, to bubble up and to allow for
Speaker 1: the excuse to, oh, see all of this, we have
Speaker 1: to combat that with new censorship, you see, And they
Speaker 1: want it to be what Christianity is is this extremist position.
Speaker 1: I'm saying that's a SiO. But what I'm also saying
Speaker 1: is that they do want to have some kind of
Speaker 1: faux right wing thing. And the reason I know that
Speaker 1: is because I have been watching right wing political stuff
Speaker 1: for twenty plus twenty five years, and they don't do.
Speaker 6: The same.
Speaker 1: They don't do different things. They always have controlled opposition groups,
Speaker 1: fed groups that step into the forefront of representing the
Speaker 1: right wing position, and then those people are headed up
Speaker 1: by the worst imaginable people. Always remember Ceville. I told
Speaker 1: people back then, this is a stupid thing. I would
Speaker 1: never go to this. And what happened. All the idiot
Speaker 1: right wingers went to Segel, exactly as I said was
Speaker 1: stupid to do. And what happened all the right wingers
Speaker 1: were played into it exactly as was wanted. The capital thing.
Speaker 1: I didn't go to the Capital thing. I thought that
Speaker 1: was I mean, I don't have a problem with people
Speaker 1: marching and whatnot, but the entrapment, like it was obvious
Speaker 1: that that would probably be some big entrapment event. Right
Speaker 1: wingers or idiots, they don't listen the good note do
Speaker 1: they want? So guess what I'm going to use my
Speaker 1: magical fortune telling powers that there will be provocateur and
Speaker 1: fake and entrapped idiot right wingers who think that they're
Speaker 1: going to re establish tiny mustache Man's empire or Reich,
Speaker 1: and they're going to play exactly into all of this.
Speaker 1: And when all this happens, and something happens and the
Speaker 1: left ends up being justified as some appearing justified as
Speaker 1: a victim, all the idiot right wingers will die awagh
Speaker 1: again and cower. And in another five years, another exactly
Speaker 1: similar thing will pop up, and all the same idiot
Speaker 1: right wingers will do the exact same thing, because they
Speaker 1: do the same thing over and over and over, and
Speaker 1: they never learn and they don't listen to people who
Speaker 1: tell them what's going to happen, even though I've been
Speaker 1: right about all this stuff. And that's why I said, like, well,
Speaker 1: these people like they're their own worst enemy. So Thomas B.
Speaker 1: Five dollars, does Grey Palms believe that God's energies are
Speaker 1: constantly sustaining the universe. Yes, let's say he definitely believes
Speaker 1: that Christ's life two dollars. Gay I what is that
Speaker 1: gay vision? Progressive vision? No like AI but gay? It
Speaker 1: was a dumb joke Carmaggio one gift, thank you, Bedski
Speaker 1: five dollars. James Whitebeard proudly stated Jay was in numerous
Speaker 1: religious movements. WHOA got me? I mean I went from
Speaker 1: being raised Baptist to.
Speaker 2: Baptist, Bible College, Calvinist, Presbyterian, Roman Catholic. And then I mean,
Speaker 2: is set of a contism a different thing? Or is
Speaker 2: it Roman Catholic?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean? So, and then I left
Speaker 1: all that got sick of it wasn't anything for a
Speaker 1: long time. Maybe I was interested in neo Platonism, but
Speaker 1: neo Platonism isn't a movement. I studied all kinds of
Speaker 1: different things, traditionalism, perennialism, but I wasn't eight into perennialism.
Speaker 1: And so like I went and joined renegan On's you know,
Speaker 1: goober Sufi Order or anything like that. I wasn't at
Speaker 1: free Toft shoe One's Nude Commune. I just read books, man,
Speaker 1: and uh so, yeah, I took a long time to
Speaker 1: work these positions out and try to figure out what
Speaker 1: I believe was the most logical, accurate, biblical, patristic historical position. So,
Speaker 1: and I mean I would imagine that James white wasn't
Speaker 1: raised Calvinists. Maybe he was, I don't know, but so
Speaker 1: it just going from Baptist or Evangelical to Calvinist. By
Speaker 1: the way, didn't James White become a post millennialist. So
Speaker 1: I'm confused. So are you allowed to change your position
Speaker 1: within or not? Like does that not count?
Speaker 2: I don't know, but I mean that's it's just like
Speaker 2: the weakest job that people try to try to use, like, oh, if.
Speaker 1: You change your mind, look at like he's unstable. Well,
Speaker 1: there's no automatic virtue to just having had a position
Speaker 1: for your whole life, because I mean that that doesn't
Speaker 1: have that has nothing to do with whether it's true
Speaker 1: or false like that just could that could just suggest
Speaker 1: that you're closed minded and arrogant and doubling down and
Speaker 1: not open to being corrected. So Frank slk five dollars.
Speaker 1: I found out that the practice of unlove and brad
Speaker 1: was started by von Drag von Drei Gazelle of ver Doom,
Speaker 1: who believed that the Last.
Speaker 2: Last Supper is a strict passover. Oh interesting, I didn't
Speaker 2: know that. So that's that would mean that when.
Speaker 1: The Eastern Church rejects it as a judaizing practice, that's
Speaker 1: exactly what it is. So I don't guess there's a
Speaker 1: whole lot more to say about the Candace oh the
Speaker 1: other thing I said to that's right, I do want
Speaker 1: to mention this now. Candace is going on a intense
Speaker 1: battle with the ideas of Zionism, rabbinic stuff, et cetera.
Speaker 1: And here's the thing I keep pointing out, which is that, Okay,
Speaker 1: you're converted to traditional Catholicism, and I think Jack pasoviiac
Speaker 1: is some kind of traditional or conservative Catholic. And I
Speaker 1: don't dislike either of these people. I think they're interesting follows.
Speaker 1: I retweet and interact with them on occasion.
Speaker 2: I don't think i've interacted. I think one time I
Speaker 2: was on a stream with Jack Pasoviec for a Lord
Speaker 2: Voldemort interview, but I don't we don't. We didn't really
Speaker 2: we were on the stream at the same time. I
Speaker 2: don't think we didn't. Like maybe we interacted a little bit,
Speaker 2: I don't remember. But I've not ever interacted with Candace.
Speaker 2: So I don't know candas or anything. I've never talked
Speaker 2: to her. But what I keep sort of trying to
Speaker 2: tweet into that domain is that, like the thing that
Speaker 2: you're fighting is what the Vatican has already accepted. Are
Speaker 2: you not aware of I mean, I'm not trying to
Speaker 2: be rude.
Speaker 1: It's like, you know, this is if we go to
Speaker 1: the US Conference of Catholic Bishop's website and we look
Speaker 1: up the document from two thousand and three Reflections on
Speaker 1: Covenant and Mission, based off of Nostratate from Vatican Two,
Speaker 1: it argues that Jews do not need to convert, convert,
Speaker 1: or become Christians. The Vatican has never opposed this document.
Speaker 1: In fact, the post Vatican Two popes have said Jews
Speaker 1: should not be proselytized. Francis is famous for saying this.
Speaker 1: This is yet again proof that the papacy no stra
Speaker 1: taate Lemon Gentem sixteen and also Reflections on Covenant and
Speaker 1: Mission are a departure from You want an example, cantat Domino,
Speaker 1: which says that Jews must be converted and joined to
Speaker 1: the body of Christ before they die to avoid being condemned.
Speaker 1: Now it says that about everyone. It says that about
Speaker 1: Eastern schismatics, Pagans, Jews. Even if you're martyred outside of
Speaker 1: the Church, you're still damned. That's Cantate Domino. Roman Catholic
Speaker 1: Dogma Council of Florence. Now, what does this reflection on
Speaker 1: Covenant and Missions document show That really makes all the
Speaker 1: trad cats fighting this battle a losing, futile effort. Why
Speaker 1: because the Roman Catholic entity, the Papacy, the Vatican organism
Speaker 1: they were going toation, has already for decades now rejected
Speaker 1: this position that you're fighting for, and Catholicism is not
Speaker 1: based on what you think tradition is. In fact, the
Speaker 1: Pope is the only legitimate interpreter of tradition, not you.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter if you think Francis is airing, if
Speaker 1: Francis is liberal. Francis got it wrong, the Catholic bishops
Speaker 1: in America got it wrong. It doesn't matter. We just
Speaker 1: saw Canon seven fifty two. You submit to their teaching
Speaker 1: even if you think it's wrong. With a docility. Now,
Speaker 1: what does their document say. Since Judaism has a threefold mission,
Speaker 1: there are certain practical conclusions that follow conclusions that suggest
Speaker 1: a joint agenda for Christians and Jews. It should be
Speaker 1: obvious that any mission of Christians to the Jews to
Speaker 1: convert them, the mission is to convert. This in this
Speaker 1: document is in direct conflict with the Jewish notion that
Speaker 1: their covenant is itself that mission. At the same time,
Speaker 1: it is important to stress notwithstanding the Covenant, there is
Speaker 1: no need for the nations of the world to embrace Judaism.
Speaker 1: So Jews are fine with their covenant. Catholics should not
Speaker 1: work to convert them. Christians have their covenant. This is
Speaker 1: dual covenant theology. It's a heresy. It's the same root
Speaker 1: heresy of idiotic dispensationalism. I'm not saying that the Catholic
Speaker 1: Church here is dispensationalists, but they've adopted the same dispensationalist
Speaker 1: error of dual covenant theology. This is night and day,
Speaker 1: the opposite of what cantatae Domino teaches. It could not
Speaker 1: be clearer and so here is yet another obvious contradiction
Speaker 1: Roman Catholic dogma. Here is the full text of Cantata Domino.
Speaker 1: The Roman Catholic Church firmly believes and confesses that every
Speaker 1: creature of God is good, nothing is to be rejected.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna skip down past this. It asserts that the
Speaker 1: indifference of clean and unclean foods of the Mosaic Law
Speaker 1: pertains to ceremonials, which, with the rise of the Gospel
Speaker 1: passed out of existence, they cease to be efficacious. Does
Speaker 1: Cantante Domino, which is Roman famous Roman Catholic dogma from
Speaker 1: the Council of Florence, does that sound at all like
Speaker 1: dual covenant theology that you just read here and then
Speaker 1: it quotes Acts fifteen the Jerusalem Council. This matter was
Speaker 1: subtle at this time when Christian religion was propagated. No
Speaker 1: cardinal Jewish beliefs appear in it, but all of these
Speaker 1: passed over into the Church, and it joins in the
Speaker 1: same rights and ceremonies of the Gospel and believing that
Speaker 1: all things are clean Titus one fifteen. With the ending
Speaker 1: of the cause of our apostolic prohibition, this has ended.
Speaker 1: So there's nothing about a dual covenant there. Now, what
Speaker 1: about not having a mission to convert the Jews? As
Speaker 1: the document said In Cantata Domino, it says that the
Speaker 1: Roman Church firmly believes, professes, and proclaims those not living
Speaker 1: within the Catholic Church, not only Pagans, but also Jews,
Speaker 1: inhertics and schismatics, will become participants an eternal life. Eternal
Speaker 1: will not become participants in eternal life, but will go
Speaker 1: into eternal fire unless before the end of their life
Speaker 1: they are added to the papal flock. And that the
Speaker 1: unity of this ecclesiastical body, the papal Church, is so
Speaker 1: strong that only those that remain in it, only to
Speaker 1: those that remain, And are the sacraments efficacious for salvation?
Speaker 1: And even if you do almsgiving and practice all of
Speaker 1: these things, and even if you die for Christ outside
Speaker 1: of the Roman communion, you cannot be saved. This clearly
Speaker 1: says there are no martyrs outside of the Roman Kelly Church. Now,
Speaker 1: the post Vatican two papacy has openly said in many
Speaker 1: times that there are tons of martyrs who have died
Speaker 1: outside the Roman Kelly Church. That is a clearest day contradiction.
Speaker 1: And anyone that is honest for themselves can see that
Speaker 1: and can admit that straight white man five dollars, I
Speaker 1: hope that you're right about the right wing falling for
Speaker 1: these tiny mustache man traps. I hope that you're wrong.
Speaker 1: I mean, they always fall for it. And although the
Speaker 1: discourse has shifted, it the Overton window discourse has shifted
Speaker 1: such that now the biggest profiles on Twitter openly debate
Speaker 1: topics that five years ago you could not discuss. That
Speaker 1: does not mean that there's not some trap being laid.
Speaker 1: And I don't know exactly how that's going to play out,
Speaker 1: but I've done and watched this long enough that that's
Speaker 1: what's going to happen. I don't know how.
Speaker 2: And people on the right are still as dumb as
Speaker 2: they were at the time of Seville. They don't they
Speaker 2: don't listen to.
Speaker 1: Anyone, but whoever their favorite talking head of the week
Speaker 1: is So why why wouldn't they fall for the same stuff.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're talking about people who think that Islam
Speaker 1: is based and that the Right and Islam should should
Speaker 1: like team up, Like that's how stupid these people are.
Speaker 1: You think they won't fall for the next trap? Of
Speaker 1: course they will. I thought I had a comment. I
Speaker 1: was gonna look for the the Peterson Candace exchange. Where
Speaker 1: is it at.
Speaker 6: H Where is it?
Speaker 1: I don't know, I can't even find it. But so
Speaker 1: basically it has progressed now to the discussion of this
Speaker 1: debate has progressed to since many people have noted the
Speaker 1: pedigree of this article that was written with Peterson. People
Speaker 1: are asking Candace says, since this is all now listed
Speaker 1: as these affiliated organizations, many people are asking doctor Peterson,
Speaker 1: why are you part with the ADL on this issue? Now?
Speaker 1: Jordan Peterson, as we know, has still chosen not to
Speaker 1: accept Christianity, and he talks a lot about God as
Speaker 1: an idea of God as this and that. It's very Jungian.
Speaker 1: It's all this kind of stuff. It's really weird to
Speaker 1: have people that are not Christians telling Christianity what it
Speaker 1: is and what they should believe. Are any of these
Speaker 1: people going to go and tell Mohammed and the Mohammedan's
Speaker 1: what Islam is? Will they be telling rabbinical teachers and
Speaker 1: sages what rabbinical philosophy is? No, but they all want
Speaker 1: to tell Christians what Christianity is. Interesting now, this is
Speaker 1: interesting because people are pointing out that in the past,
Speaker 1: in twenty seventeen, doctor Peterson was discussing that the ADL
Speaker 1: was working to shut down speech and apparently was critical
Speaker 1: of this, and yet now it is being discussed that
Speaker 1: he is writing letters or essays about this with these organizations.
Speaker 1: So what is it is like free speech or not? Right? Well,
Speaker 1: that's why they are working and need to make the
Speaker 1: phrase Christ is King hate speech, even though most people
Speaker 1: who are into theology know that there's nothing to do
Speaker 1: with hate speech. However, another reason that this is a
Speaker 1: problematic statement is not just obviously because Jewish philosophy and
Speaker 1: religion would reject it, but dispensationalists hate this phrase because
Speaker 1: dispensationalists do not actually believe Christ is game. They believe
Speaker 1: that there's dual covenant theology and that there's no relevance
Speaker 1: of Christianity to the political sphere christian Zionism, et cetera,
Speaker 1: because they don't have the church. And as I argued
Speaker 1: once again, the Roman Catholic Church no longer teaches the
Speaker 1: necessity of a Christian state or that Christianity speaks to
Speaker 1: the social sphere. Vatican two, in its religious Liberty being
Speaker 1: the Tatus Humane Jacques Martin and John Courtney Murray chapters
Speaker 1: accepted religious pluralism. And that's why I brought this up
Speaker 1: to one of these Roman Catholics today right here, Yeah,
Speaker 1: he says, uh. When I said that the Roman Church
Speaker 1: post Vatican two has talked about de christianizing Catholic Christian
Speaker 1: states and that it needs to accept a form of
Speaker 1: religious pluralism, all of Ettican Two's religious liberty doctrine, and
Speaker 1: then this guy, Catholic guy, Oh that's a stretch. No,
Speaker 1: it's not a stretch. Go read your Vatican two documents. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I'm just so tired of talking about this. Stupid people stuffed.
Speaker 1: It's like we've reached the point where, like anybody's still
Speaker 1: in this And I love you, Tim, but like Tim,
Speaker 1: you're sitting here saying that the greatest saint pope of
Speaker 1: your century was preaching Satanic doctrines. Anyway, Addy Valentine ten dollars,
Speaker 1: Do you think that Orthodox YouTube is divine providence?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I think, well, everything's under divine providence, so yeah, is
Speaker 1: it some sort of play by the elites. No, the
Speaker 1: elites are not promoting Orthodox Christianity. I consure that is
Speaker 1: it my algorithm. I think the algorithms is pushing what
Speaker 1: people are interested in. Glitter arrhythm. Five dollars. Dawson has
Speaker 1: great work in the past.
Speaker 2: I understand why you wouldn't want to if that's your opinion,
Speaker 2: wouldn't want to what No, I'm not gonna tuck the
Speaker 2: Ryan Dawson.
Speaker 1: We had a debate on atheism already he says Christianity
Speaker 1: is a sile. I mean, go watch the debate that
Speaker 1: I did with him about basic philosophical things, and it's like,
Speaker 1: do you guys not understand how annoying and frustrating it
Speaker 1: is to have debates with people who can't even do
Speaker 1: basic philosophical discussion. Glitch your rhythm two dollars, don't skip
Speaker 1: my superjets again, I'm not skipping your superjets.
Speaker 2: Did you watch the debate with Ryan Dawson? Did you
Speaker 2: not see how stupid it was that lies is on
Speaker 2: dots five dollars? Would you be up for a two
Speaker 2: on two debate with on the Trinity with Nick? I
Speaker 2: mean I would go on God Logic and do a
Speaker 2: Trinity debate with people but or Crucible or Jake Riddles saying,
Speaker 2: But it just depends on who the opponents are, Like,
Speaker 2: I'm not debating any of these low tier people. So know,
Speaker 2: if it's like somebody with two thousand followers.
Speaker 1: Forty two attack ten dollars talk to Bishop Baron? Why
Speaker 1: why maybe not a debate? Can we cut to people
Speaker 1: that actually know what they're saying? Don't? I mean, did
Speaker 1: you hear Bishop Baron debate with William Land Craig. I
Speaker 1: don't think Bishop Baron knows what he's talking about. How
Speaker 1: about a real talk with Shamune.
Speaker 2: I mean, I've had a lot of discussions with Shamune.
Speaker 1: Guys. Why do I have to for you to learn stuff?
Speaker 1: It's not necessary for me to interact with all the
Speaker 1: other people. I mean, I don't mind it, but we've
Speaker 1: been interacting and debating with people for this is like
Speaker 1: we've done seven years of debates, seven years of open
Speaker 1: debate for hours, and you guys always want me to
Speaker 1: talk to some normy goofball like Bishop Baron. I don't.
Speaker 1: First of all, those people don't want to talk to me,
Speaker 1: and why would I want to talk to them? Why
Speaker 1: would want talk somebody wh don't want talk to me?
Speaker 1: When are you going to debate Gavin Orland? I've already
Speaker 1: addressed these people. Gavin Orland doesn't want to talk to me.
Speaker 1: Roadrunas I is five dollars. You've been to help in
Speaker 1: me improving my life. Thank you, man, I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you, bro keep putting out the heat. Appreciate that, man.
Speaker 1: Forty two attack. If Christ wants us to not be lukewarm,
Speaker 1: how do you think we should go through life? I
Speaker 1: mean not lukewarm? So what do you mean Must we
Speaker 1: think about these topics all the time? I do, but
Speaker 1: I will lie it's not fun. Would he be okay
Speaker 1: with me watching a baseball game to get a break?
Speaker 1: I know that you're against that foolishness. I never said
Speaker 1: you can't watch a baseball game, so I never said that.
Speaker 1: I just said sports is an idol. But I'm not
Speaker 1: a monk man, We're not monastics, so there's nothing wrong
Speaker 1: with leisure. Something wrong.
Speaker 2: I mean, we watch movies, man, I write books on movies,
Speaker 2: right for Sam Hyde. Why would I think that a
Speaker 2: baseball game is wrong? Ezra's goes two dollars? God bless
Speaker 2: you today. Thank you man, I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Remember subscribe to my site at jasonalysis dot com. You
Speaker 1: can get access to the archives. You can get signed
Speaker 1: copies of esoter Collywood one and two. You can always
Speaker 1: get those in the shop. And by the way, we
Speaker 1: are back home, so the book orders that have been
Speaker 1: back ordered and slow, they will be going out very soon.
Speaker 1: So I know a lot of people have been waiting.
Speaker 1: We had two deaths. We had to go deal with that.
Speaker 1: Those those we had to bury people and we had to,
Speaker 1: you know, deal with that for a month. So it's
Speaker 1: not I can't order the books and mail the books
Speaker 1: when I'm traveling to multiple places for funerals. So I'm
Speaker 1: sorry that your books are late. You're gonna get your books.
Speaker 1: There's no need to complain. You don't have to email me,
Speaker 1: you don't have to get tracking for ups.
Speaker 2: You get your books, I promise you. Okay, just be patient.
Speaker 2: It's going to take a little bit longer than normal.
Speaker 2: And what else am I forgetting to plug? The philosophy
Speaker 2: course is still available. You can get access to the
Speaker 2: philosophy course by clicking the link right here, the new
Speaker 2: Philosophy course. It's always available. As long as Richard Grove lives,
Speaker 2: it will be there. Straight Why I'm off at ours.
Speaker 2: People want you to talk to Normy so that you
Speaker 2: can decimate their worldview repress. All of those discussions have
Speaker 2: already been had.
Speaker 1: I responded to icon critiques about five times. Just type
Speaker 1: in jdi r icons and you'll get all of the
Speaker 1: same arguments that I would make were I to talk
Speaker 1: to Kevin Norland. Type in Jadier set of a contism.
Speaker 1: You'll get all the arguments that I would make against
Speaker 1: the set of a contest. I know many of you
Speaker 1: find endless, infinite debates entertaining. I don't find these debates
Speaker 1: entertaining anymore. They're chores, They're boring, They're always the same debate.
Speaker 1: They don't I mean, even the Islam stuff was new,
Speaker 1: but after six years, the Islam debates are all the same.
Speaker 1: The tag questions are all the same. Everyone that calls
Speaker 1: in to the open debates ask the exact same tag questions.
Speaker 1: Everyone that calls in about PSA asks the same PSA question.
Speaker 1: I understand you like to watch, but.
Speaker 2: Like I like to do other things, guys, Like, I'm
Speaker 2: having a lot more fun writing for the same HID
Speaker 2: show than debating goobers for the for the thousandth time.
Speaker 1: I promise you, if you had heard the same debate
Speaker 1: and had the same debate for twenty plus years, you'd
Speaker 1: be tired of it. Man Walk with the Spirit says,
Speaker 1: it's funny for us. I know it's funny, I know,
Speaker 1: but so is just sitting here on a livestream and
Speaker 1: making making fun of people. That's that's equally as fun
Speaker 1: for me. Like, and god, don't you guys, like, so
Speaker 1: if you really like debates, like just go back to
Speaker 1: the back catalog. You understand there's hundreds of hours for
Speaker 1: you guys of idiots. We just had, Like I had
Speaker 1: a twenty know an hour debate with an atheist idiot
Speaker 1: that was hilarious on the last X space And guess what,
Speaker 1: it's the same as every atheist debate, Like why do
Speaker 1: I have to Why are you guys making me torture
Speaker 1: myself with.
Speaker 14: The same debate that every damn atheist has said since
Speaker 14: I out there a atheists when I was nineteen, I've
Speaker 14: never heard him say anything.
Speaker 1: New or different.
Speaker 2: Is a lot of this audience like just twenty years
Speaker 2: old or something like they just haven't seen a lot
Speaker 2: of this. Let me tell you something, when you get
Speaker 2: to be middle of life, it's the same stuff. Nobody
Speaker 2: brings anything new or different or interesting.
Speaker 1: A little What about Gavin Ortland? David Ortland? I did
Speaker 1: a twenty minute video that addresses the basics of what
Speaker 1: Gavin Ortland talks about. Guess what, lazy bones, you don't
Speaker 1: even have to watch the two hour live stream the
Speaker 1: three hour talk, because that's a half talk. You don't
Speaker 1: even have to watch those here's a twenty minute video
Speaker 1: from Protestant scholars right there. Go watch that straight white
Speaker 1: male five bucks. The Sam Hi Show is awesome, by
Speaker 1: the way, Bro, thanks man. I appreciate that. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's a you know, it's an honor. I'm really happy
Speaker 1: to be doing it. I'm really I'm honored and humbled that.
Speaker 1: And it's not just me. We've got We've got Ryan
Speaker 1: and a couple other guys writing too. But I've just
Speaker 1: been really humbled that.
Speaker 2: You know, somebody who is as good at comedy as
Speaker 2: Sam is, that he would utilize my ideas.
Speaker 1: It's just it's just a very humbling thing, and I'm really,
Speaker 1: I'm really thankful. I'm really appreciative. Sam's been super cool,
Speaker 1: super nice to me, a man of his word, never
Speaker 1: said or done anything weird or not done what he
Speaker 1: said he would do, very professional, very driven, very hard working,
Speaker 1: doesn't stop. He's a beast and you know, one of
Speaker 1: the best funniest minds out there today. So you know,
Speaker 1: I'm living my best life. That's all I'm saying. I'm
Speaker 1: living my best's life, honey, And I hope you are too. JB.
Speaker 1: Paltier five bucks, when are you gonna necromance Mohammed with
Speaker 1: magic and debating. That'd be interesting, like that I might
Speaker 1: go to Let me go to the Witch of Indoor,
Speaker 1: and when she gets done talking to Samuel, we'll see
Speaker 1: if she can raise.
Speaker 6: Momo.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I was when I was bragging.
Speaker 2: When James Whitet was saying that he didn't think I
Speaker 2: was a comedian, I said, I'll have you know I
Speaker 2: write for one of the biggest comedians out there.
Speaker 1: You might have heard the name Amy Schumer, Giovanni Martinez.
Speaker 1: What's up, glitchy rhythm? Five dollars? The young wings can
Speaker 1: learn a lot about their own beliefs from debates.
Speaker 2: You still miss my ten dollars super jet, Well man,
Speaker 2: I'm trying. I'm scrolling back ten dollars.
Speaker 1: Would you consider another debate with Ryan Dawson on Christianity
Speaker 1: as a sigh up, No, it's no different than all
Speaker 1: the same stuff that the same debate that Cotel had
Speaker 1: with Adam Green. Why would I do the exact same
Speaker 1: debate over again. It's like debate Vegan gains and ask
Speaker 1: yourself on ethics. We already did debate Ryan Dawson on Christianity.
Speaker 1: We already did Ryan Dawson couldn't state why relativism is
Speaker 1: a contradiction when I argued what it was, that that
Speaker 1: it was, and he couldn't state that. He couldn't he
Speaker 1: couldn't grasp that. So if a person is a moral, ethical,
Speaker 1: epistemic relativist, the debate is already over, as was Ghost
Speaker 1: two dollars. Fake piety is annoying. That's one of the worst,
Speaker 1: most annoying things out there. Common Sense twenty three, twenty three.
Speaker 1: I didn't know Worlan, We'll talk to you. I was
Speaker 1: just wondering. I mean, look, a lot of people in
Speaker 1: the consuming content space have no discernment and they can't
Speaker 1: pick out how fake and phony and posturing. And like
Speaker 1: most of these online apologists people, they're awful, They're I
Speaker 1: don't even want to be associated. I cringe when people say,
Speaker 1: are you one of these online apologists? I'm like, oh, please,
Speaker 1: don't classic with these people because I don't like any
Speaker 1: of these people. I mean, Tim Gordon doesn't even say
Speaker 1: as an apologist, and it's just a crowd of just
Speaker 1: the worst.
Speaker 6: Man.
Speaker 1: I don't like any of them. Trying to think of
Speaker 1: I mean, I like Sam Shimoun, I mean on a
Speaker 1: personal level.
Speaker 3: I like.
Speaker 1: God logic, I like Nick, but like the rest of them,
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't even want to be in this
Speaker 1: stuff with these people. These people are yeah straight, Why
Speaker 1: me two dollars debate Trump? That would be fun. I
Speaker 1: don't know what I would do if I did debate Trump.
Speaker 1: Might be a little nervous on that one. Anyway, Guys,
Speaker 1: h like and share support this show through our sponsors
Speaker 1: chalk dot Com. Get the books, go to the website, subscribe,
Speaker 1: go to the rock Fin get access to the saying
Speaker 1: to the stuff on rock Fin as well as all
Speaker 1: of our friends on rock Fan. Rock Fans still there,
Speaker 1: still going uh oh, and then bitcoin. I wanted to
Speaker 1: mention this real quick before we go. Uh we love
Speaker 1: Ivan over here. Ivan was cracking me up. Ivan had
Speaker 1: some good comments. Let's hear it a little bit of
Speaker 1: this before we go.
Speaker 15: Based on that analy and we are bullish for the
Speaker 15: coming weeks. Why again, there's this credit card has an
Speaker 15: interest rate that's really really low?
Speaker 1: How low this low the credit card?
Speaker 15: It's no more fat? Like which fat? This tariff fat?
Speaker 15: I don't believe really that is it is so significant
Speaker 15: that the whole market is going to zero that people
Speaker 15: are presicting and both when it comes to stocks. I mean,
Speaker 15: there's so much fun, it's quite crazy. But not only that,
Speaker 15: you also have Bob Lucas coming out saying that, you know,
Speaker 15: let the cycle rehire, at least for now, likely we
Speaker 15: will rehire both for stock.
Speaker 1: So we had all this food and tariff food right,
Speaker 1: so the tariff scared the markets and that's been annoying.
Speaker 1: But it's not annoying. This is good because many of
Speaker 1: you were whining and complaining weeks and months ago when
Speaker 1: we had the new at H and I tried to
Speaker 1: explain that when it dips is the time to buy
Speaker 1: and for bitcoin.
Speaker 15: And listen, Bitcoin has not changed. Bitcoin is the same
Speaker 15: as it's always been. The use case of bilkoin now
Speaker 15: is stronger because the Trump administration has been printing pro
Speaker 15: bitcoin orders all the time. You have Lutnik. Look at
Speaker 15: who is actually in charge of the garments right now.
Speaker 15: You have Lutnik being literally in bitcoin, having hundreds of
Speaker 15: millions in bitcoin. It's very very very important. Let me
Speaker 15: bring this up. Lutnik hundreds of millions bitcoin. This is
Speaker 15: very key, okay, very very key, and he is likely
Speaker 15: to get even more crypto and this is so important
Speaker 15: here Howard Lutnik, and.
Speaker 1: So don't you got to say how bullish this is
Speaker 1: with all of these people in the administration. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter whether you like these people or none of that matters.
Speaker 1: Like they've established a strategic reserve. Loomis is now saying
Speaker 1: she's going to introduce the bill that will take bitcoin
Speaker 1: to eight hundred k in five years.
Speaker 15: And so many other people in the administration are holding
Speaker 15: Let's see, here's the US Secretary of Commerce. He has
Speaker 15: stepped down as chairman of counter of Fitzgerald and he
Speaker 15: has confirmed this was weeks ago, that he has hundreds
Speaker 15: let me see, hundreds of millions in crypto and he
Speaker 15: will go to billions. This guy is going to go
Speaker 15: to billions. You have Trump holding five hundred million worth
Speaker 15: of eth and he's lost quite a lot now on
Speaker 15: this recent eve, Damn Trump has lost quite a lot. Next,
Speaker 15: you have an evil at mask and everyone else who
Speaker 15: is a pro business I mean.
Speaker 1: Literally forty two attack ten dollars. You think that I'm
Speaker 1: telling you to debate Shammoun father Schmid's baron when I
Speaker 1: said talk, no man, those people don't want to talk
Speaker 1: to me. I mean, Sam will talk to me. But
Speaker 1: Sam's a controversial God. These other people avoid controversy. They
Speaker 1: don't want to talk to me. Man, everyone is doing
Speaker 1: a little chats these days, Gospel Daily, wored broy don't.
Speaker 1: They don't talk to people associated with the Lord of
Speaker 1: Baltimore and people in the conspiracy world. So I'm not
Speaker 1: show to be mean to you. It's just they don't.
Speaker 1: They're not going to do that.
Speaker 2: I hate Afka one dollar. What's the move out of
Speaker 2: idealism into realism. I'm confused with the reality being the
Speaker 2: mind of God. Reality is not the mind of God.
Speaker 2: Reality is a creation based on the mind of God.
Speaker 2: We are icons of God, right, so we're made in
Speaker 2: the image of God. Well, we are not in the
Speaker 2: mind of God. In a sense of like idealism, there's
Speaker 2: an external world that God created that is not identical
Speaker 2: to God and not identical to the divine mind. Jack
Speaker 2: Carson fifteen ten dollars, Jay, are you afraid to debate me?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 1: Terrified? Just kidding.
Speaker 2: I'm not actually giving ortland ps Yes. Have you ever
Speaker 2: addressed penal self substitutionary tone?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 1: Never, I've never addressed PSA and I never will remember,
Speaker 1: say your five dollars, what is the last time you
Speaker 1: played Nome Hyperborea. Maybe we need to go out on that.
Speaker 1: Let's listen to Ivan has some good pointer here. This
Speaker 1: man in charge.
Speaker 15: So there's no way that the stock market will fall further.
Speaker 15: There's no way that the stock market will enter some
Speaker 15: kind of depression or bear market or what the hell
Speaker 15: people are saying, because the whole administration literally is full
Speaker 15: of crypto people and stock market people, and also the
Speaker 15: voters who voted for Trump, all of them have a
Speaker 15: four to one k And when you look at your
Speaker 15: four to one k, you look at your retirement, you
Speaker 15: quickly see maybe maybe it's not that good that the
Speaker 15: market is dumping. So basically, everyone who supports Trump and
Speaker 15: this administration, they don't like this current thing with markets
Speaker 15: going down. And that's why I think Trump will come
Speaker 15: out in the.
Speaker 1: No one at the Daily Wire is going to debate
Speaker 1: with me, except for perhaps Michael Knowles if we can
Speaker 1: convince him to go to Tim Cast with Tim Gordon.
Speaker 1: No one in the sphere of those normy Roman Catholics, ever,
Speaker 1: is going to debate with me. And they don't want to,
Speaker 1: and I don't care, and I don't care about them.
Speaker 1: So and anyone who's not interested in talking to me,
Speaker 1: I don't want to talk to them. Why would I
Speaker 1: want to talk to low tier ormies who don't want
Speaker 1: to talk to me. Glitcherrythan five dollars. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: debate anyone to prove orthodoxy is true. It's interesting topic.
Speaker 1: You objectively prove church history. You do that well. I
Speaker 1: get it though.
Speaker 15: In the coming weeks and you will be heavily, heavily
Speaker 15: pumping the market. And he's already kind of start that.
Speaker 15: This was earlier today he came out and said, our
Speaker 15: economy will boom. Okay, our economy will boom. This is
Speaker 15: very important for him.
Speaker 2: Okay, guys pushing the clicking the button, the economy will boom.
Speaker 1: Trump is getting uh the morale up and why because
Speaker 1: of this? Let me go to this part.
Speaker 15: It's a question of time before the the fat decreases
Speaker 15: rates and also starts QI. Who the hell knows at
Speaker 15: the end of the day, it's a fiat that who
Speaker 15: the hell knows at then of the day, it's a
Speaker 15: fiat that based economy chijuk reserve. That's step number one.
Speaker 15: Step number two is to get Congress to vote to.
Speaker 1: What was step number one, Bitcoin Strategic Reserve, which was
Speaker 1: just announced. I told you this was coming. What is
Speaker 1: the scrow.
Speaker 15: Buy one million bitcoins? It's happening. Listen to this from
Speaker 15: Cynthia loomis very very important.
Speaker 5: I'm so pleased to announce that today I will be
Speaker 5: reintroducing the Bitcoin Act, and I'll be joined here shortly
Speaker 5: by Senator Justice of West Virginia, who is one of
Speaker 5: the co sponsors, and we have several other additional cos sponsors,
Speaker 5: and a lot of it is a result of the
Speaker 5: excitement that's been building both of them. I'm so pleased
Speaker 5: to there.
Speaker 15: I mean, she's so pleasant when she speaks. It's crazy.
Speaker 15: It's she has that, you know, a good grandma voice.
Speaker 15: You know, I want to drink and eat cookies in
Speaker 15: her kitchen and discuss a life or something. You listen
Speaker 15: to her speaker like man, it's it's a very very
Speaker 15: nice voice.
Speaker 3: Very ver.
Speaker 15: That's how she convinces Aaron to vote for this bitcoin stuff.
Speaker 15: She comes there with cookies with.
Speaker 1: That's right. Shout out to Ivan, That's what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: You all ready to retire when we get that purchase.
Speaker 1: That's what I'm talking about.
Speaker 2: So what I'm talking about, I'm going full Kip Baby,
Speaker 2: full on Kip dynamite.
Speaker 1: What's what I'm talking about? Why is this not working?
Speaker 1: I'm trying to play Nome Hyperborea on the way out
Speaker 1: and it's not one to do. It's it's being a
Speaker 1: fussy thing. Here we go. You already.
Speaker 2: Did you as true.
Speaker 1: Counsel go so se you when you both through that.
Speaker 2: He didn't want to stand where everything he touch your hat, but.
Speaker 12: You wanted the life when you start, only some way start,
Speaker 12: don't we know the lo.
Speaker 5: We told you to have.
Speaker 6: Only a.
Speaker 2: Only a lovely.
Speaker 13: Staring at seling that see a stock unslow and both.
Speaker 1: So if you win, you bos never to touch you.
Speaker 1: He cantiates too much, rest to
Speaker 15: Neon only the sunn