Speaker 1: If you want to support the show and get the
episodes early and ad free, head on over to Freemanbeyond
the Wall dot com forward slash Support. I want to
explain something right now. If you support me through substack
or Patreon, you have access to an RSS feed that
you can plug into any podcastcher, including Apple, and you'll
be able to listen to the episodes through there. If
you support me through a subscribe, Star, gum Road or
on my website directly, I will send you a link
where you can download the file and you can listen
to it any way you wish. I really appreciate the
support everyone gives me. It keeps the show going. It
allows me to basically put out an episode every day now,
and I'm not going to stop. I'm just going to accelerate.
I think sometimes you see that I'm putting out two
even three a day, and yeah, can't do it without you,
So thank you for the support. Head on over to
Freeman Beyond the Wall dot com, forward slash support and
do it there. Thank you. I want to welcome everyone
back to the Pekingana Show. Justin Stam is back. What's
gone on?
Speaker 2: Justin? Not much? Brother? How you doing doing good?
Speaker 1: Doing good. All right, let's do this, let's get let's
get people on board with some of the genius that
you're putting out there, some of the ideas that I think.
There are a lot of places we can learn from,
and one of them, as someone who grew up in
New York City, hits pretty close to home. So why
don't you tell everybody about this substack that you wrote?
And how well, why don't you tell Why don't you
give the background of it? Why don't you give you know,
why do you talk about the mob what has come
to be known as the mafia?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 3: Well, first, thanks for having me again. And I didn't
know you're from New York So interesting learning more about
you all the time. Usually when we talk, we go
and talk about principal's concepts and the things that we
like nerding out about, not each other.
Speaker 2: So that's kind of cool.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So forgive me if I don't speak right. I'm
a little bit sick right now, but I'll try to
stay stay focused. My background with this subject is it
goes back to many years ago when my mom was
around the entertainment business and when I was probably a teenager.
If I remember right, as I wrote she began going
back in after leaving it for a while and going
into literary property representation, talent agent and so forth. Film
commissioned work like an Arizona and doing so, she met
somebody that knew somebody that had the rights and possessions
to some mafia story and it wasn't the one that
she ended up with, but she had some trouble with
somebody from the Gambino mob and tried to shake her
down to be a plant in La and she reached
out to somebody else that ended up being a man
named Tommy Soback that worked for Uncle Jimmy Alow and
so through the person that we knew to Tommy, he says,
don't worry about it. I'll get rid of that guy
for you, and he did.
Speaker 2: So.
Speaker 3: At that time, that was back in eighty eight eighty nine.
My mother Diana, she.
Speaker 2: Was like, who is this Tommy?
Speaker 3: Jimmy to tell this Gambino guy to get the hell
out of here. So he calls her back and says,
did that guy take off?
Speaker 2: Did he leave you alone?
Speaker 3: And she says, yes, yes, thank you appreciate that, but
you know who are you and who's this Jimmy Alo?
She didn't know anything about that world, just like me
until many years later. Because I have a voracious appetite
for history and why things are the way they are.
I wanted to know how the mafia stories play into
the mafia world plays into the regular world, what we
would think is the regular world. So over a period
of a few years, he tried to convince her to
represent what he had been collecting, which are transcripts and
recordings of conversations over many years he had with Jimmy Alow.
These are all transcripts from conversations with one of the
founding members of the American Mafia Commission, Vincent Jimmy blue
Eyes A Loo. And I mentioned this before in other streams,
but I'll just real quickly say that Jimmy was younger
than Luciano and Siegel and some of the other guys
at the time of the what they called the Knight
of Vespers. And if I remember right, nineteen off the
top of my head, I can't remember nineteen thirty one,
thirty two if I remember right, it might might have
been later.
Speaker 2: I'll look it up.
Speaker 3: But over a period of six months, they took out
Joe the Boss Massorea and Salvator of Maronzano and Sarah
sal Marenzano represented the black hand and Joe the Boss
was just an American Sicilian gangster. So first they were
working with Joe the Boss to later on takeout Marenzano,
and Luciano started something new and that was the America
Mafi Commission.
Speaker 2: And the commission was.
Speaker 3: Composed of Sicilian's Irish.
Speaker 2: Some some blocks.
Speaker 3: It handled some drug dealing for some government officials.
Speaker 2: More on that later.
Speaker 3: So the more she began to learn about this, the
more she understood that Jimmy, although younger than Luciano, he
earned his stripes by partaking in the Castella Marisi War
in the night of what they called the Knight of
Vesper's War of that era. And so basically Luciana sen
in Jewish gangsters to kill Joe the Boss in Salvatore
Brenzanto and the only Italian that was there was who
it was, Vincent Jimmy blue Isalo, so he got his button.
He became a may guy from somebody that was also
in New York at the time. His name is Sammy
Rosselli or I'm sorry Johnny Rosselli and Johnny Roselli spent
most of his time in Chicago, a lot of his
time in LA and also representing the Chicago and New
York interest in the Vegas casinos. Years later, Johnny Rosselli
was killed because of the Frank Church Committee that was
investigating CIA and FBI wrongdoing in nineteen seventy five.
Speaker 2: And the only two.
Speaker 3: Guys that were called up to testify about their cooperation
and partnership through Operation Underworld and Gladio with the CIA
to go around overthrowing governments and killing people, assassinating people, including.
Speaker 2: Castro, was.
Speaker 3: Sam Gene Kanta and Johnny Rozseelli. Well, all indicators because
everybody was wired tapping everybody. Sam Gen kinda, they knew
he was going to talk, so he was killed and
that was by not the CIA, but the mob. Johnny
Rizselli indicated he was going to talk too, So it
was it was Vincent Jimmy Blue Eyes a Loo that
gave the hit to Tommy Sobeck to take out Johnny Roselli.
And anybody that knows mob history knows that he ended
up in an oil drum down in Florida. So he
shot and killed him, put him in the oil drum.
It was Tommy Sobek that killed him, and it was
Johnny or Uncle Jimmy that gave the order to and
he was given a free pass by the CIA and
the FBI because it would have implicated them in wrongdoing
and illegal actions too. So that's who called my mom
and got rid of the Gambino guy and eventually convinced
my mother Diana to take on the responsibility of representing
Jimmy Alo's life story. And So I was a kid
then I was still writing skateboards and BMX bikes and
going surfing in San Diego. And so years later, as
I began to get an interest in screenwriting and getting
around the business, that's when I began to put two
and two together regarding the not only the relationship that
they had, but the similar actions they take.
Speaker 2: And people act like, Okay.
Speaker 3: There's this world, there's corrupt politics, and all the way
over there is the mafia, and that would be the
Jewish mafia, Italian mafia, the Chinese triads, the Yakuza, the
Colombian cartels, as if they have nothing to do with
each other and nothing to do with the real world,
the real politics. Actually they are very much connected in
principle and in partnerships. And that's the real shocker that
a lot of people have finally come to understand.
Speaker 2: Look, it goes on twins.
Speaker 3: What are the conversations everybody knows, right, you cannot get
into power without taking actions through the four methods that
I talk about. I know, Robert Green I was talking
about the forty eight laws of power, but in reality
it really just breaks down to those four, those four
laws of power. I mentioned their tactics really, which is
of course Pala, which is the.
Speaker 2: Name of my book I'm putting out soon.
Speaker 3: It was a TV series I'm putting out as a
book because I don't want to go through the gatekeepers anymore. Pla, influence, peddling, extortion,
We got this dirt on you, didn't we do those
nice things for you? Now you're going to do what
we want you to do. That's how they operate. Threats
of violence and then killing. And I say killing because
it's not always murder, because guess what, even legitimate governments
kill you if you get in their way. And in
the past history, even Catholic rulers Christian kingdoms killed people
that got in their way.
Speaker 2: That's not murder.
Speaker 3: Because some of these guys were bad people that wanted
to destroy Europe, that wanted to invade Concker, convert to Islam, traffic,
kids and people and everything else like what happened during
the Turkishotoman Empire. So uh, the point is is that
these tactics are used by everyone that has power and
wants to keep power. So it's not just an issue
of saying, oh, the mob guys, they hurt people, they
kill people, and they operate a separate form of governance
within society like an underworld. Okayuess what all the parties
do that? All the secret fraternities do that. And if
you don't have power through soft or hard power, that's
the only way you can exist. Flying to the radar.
So I thought that was a very to summate. I
thought that was a very interesting observation that most people
don't really see. All they see is gangster movies. That's
not the mob, that's not the mob, that's not the mafia.
Speaker 2: In fact, they don't. They don't.
Speaker 3: Like Jimmy said, we didn't run around guns everywhere. I
hardly ever carried a gun.
Speaker 1: Right, That was a lot. That's a lot to jump
off of talk about Hollywood. I mean you've obviously had
dealings there. What do you see, I mean, relate it
to everything you just talked about.
Speaker 3: Right, So, first, my first take at trying to make
it as a writer in Hollywood was in two thousand
and one. It wasn't on a mafia story. It was
actually about the assassination of Martin Luther King, Junior. And
it wasn't directly a King story. It was about it
was called code name Zorro, and it was about the
FBI program of following around under the counter intelligence co
intel pro program because the FBI handled domestic intelligence operations
at that time, so since the late fifties, so they
would follow around anybody suspected of being a communist. And
he was definitely in bed with a lot of people
like that.
Speaker 2: We see the paperwork.
Speaker 1: The paperwork came out the other day that a lot
of us knew what was in it already, right, but
we didn't know that like the Communist Party USA considered
King to be probably the arch Marxist Leninist in the country.
That's what's in those documents.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Stanley Levison was the leader of the American Communist Party
and he wrote all of his speeches. He wrote a
lot of his books, Ghosts, Rhythm and so forth. But
the point is is that as far as my story goes,
and I've been saying these things for so long, I've
been saying everything that they're talking about. Now I have it,
I have screened. This is a typical writer trick. You
you copyright and then you register with a writers guild,
and then you mail yourself five different copies of your
original script and then it's postmarked and sealed, so nobody
can say, hey, that was my idea first No, it wasn't.
Here's mine, and you can sue them. I still have
unopened copies of that original one, first draft that I
did in two thousand and one. So my point is
it was it's essentially about how the third and position
of the FBI. William Sullivan, who was ironically the first
Democrat and Catholic in the FBI to go up to
that position, third and position Division five, which is the
Intelligence Division, and he actually was an advocate of King
before getting into that position. Right, He didn't like Philip Randolph,
he didn't like Roy Wilkins, he didn't like all these
other civil rights leaders at the time.
Speaker 2: He liked King.
Speaker 3: But two weeks into him being assigned to surveillance of
King's life, he was on record in his own internal
memos saying he's the most degenerate person I've ever run
across to my life, and he testified to that in
the Church Committee I just mentioned before. He was assassinated
before going into and testifying at the House of House
Select Committee of Assassinations in nineteen seventy six and seven.
So he was one of fourteen federal agents involved with
the JFK, MLK and RFK assassination of vestigations that ended
up dying right before testifying. So I thought that was
a very interesting angle. What if I tell the story
of William Sullivan, who knew about King from the inside,
but also was fighting Hoover for reform, and how he
was illegally following people around. I mean, at the time
I was more liberal, obviously, but I thought it was
a travesty that he was doing that. In reality retrospect,
I don't mind him doing that because he was actually
stopping a lot of communism, but not for the reasons
that you think, not for freedom of speech and all
the rights and so forth.
Speaker 2: So that's the angle I took.
Speaker 3: It was actually more or less the William Sullivan story
about telling the story about what happened to King can
happen to anybody. And I know the FEDS were involved
with killing him in partnership with as we're going to
probably find out, hopefully the Masad and so forth. Same
type of people don't criticize the expansion of the wars
against Communism while we're also financing Communism through foreign aid.
In several production offices pitching these stories which I had
an agent, I had raised fifty million dollars three times.
But when money goes an escrow, you still have to
go and get a sales agent letter for intented distribution.
Speaker 2: If you can't get that.
Speaker 3: Falls out of escrow and you got to get a
director lined up, a shoot, principal photography date, delivery date.
It's like it's amazing a movie ever gets done, the
show ever gets done. That happened to us again recently
with this Pale of show that we tried doing. Raised
one hundred and thirty million dollars, ended up turning out
to be dirty money I didn't want walked away. But
the point is is that in doing the research of it,
of that story and interviewing people that I knew from
the world that Jimmy Alo was around, I got to
interview certain people like Tommy Amato.
Speaker 2: Tommy A.
Speaker 3: Motto was cousin the Joe Bonado. Tommy Amato was a
guy that handled a lot of the operation Gladio money.
He would take money from CIA and go and hire
an assassin for many different operations. One of them was
the killer for King. It wasn't James Earl Ray and
so I spent several hours with him in Sherman Oaks
and here in California. And Tommy Motto a very interesting guy,
lived a life that he did. But towards the end
there he had a triple bypass surgery and he found
God really quick. So he went to Mass every day.
He walk around his house, especially in the summer, just
with shorts, and he had the scar that went all
the way down his leg because of the heart surgery.
And he was always ready to go to Mass in
the morning. Vespers on Saturday go to Mass on Saturday,
talking really religiously because he started to have a conscience
towards the end of his life. Right, but when he
told me that about you know the King thing, and
some other people that he was involved in helping get
rid of. He also talked about how and the assassination
of Johnny Rizselli, and so that was confirmed of course
already by Jimmy and Tommy Sobek and so forth. So
all these stories, it's like, where do you put all
this stuff in the era of censorship? Because my angle
to tell any of this stuff was always, look, I
want to expose to the world that code named Zara
was not about King. I don't like king. It's not
about king, I don't hate them. It was a neutral
subject for me. It was about whether or not this
federal mafia, as Jimmy would call it, is it legal
to do the things that it does. Now, if it
calls itself of mafia, it's right. But if you're a
democracy or a republic, you know, so why can they
do it?
Speaker 2: And we can't?
Speaker 3: Now you realize you're in an anarcho tyranny. And so
two thousand and one, man, that was the same year
as nine to eleven, and so the year that I
began writing, getting out there, raising money, getting an agent,
meeting with people. That's when the censorship began. It didn't
start just recently censorship began in two thousand and one,
and that was the first year the Patriot Well right,
it was around that time the Patriot Act was passed.
The Patriot Act removed the vice A court requirements for
surveilling people that the Church Committee from nineteen seventy five
resulted in because of over use and abuse of the
system of an investigation outside of legal purview. But the
point is is that people to understand this, no federal
agency that had intelligence capabilities had any congressional oversight until
nineteen seventy five because of the Church Committee, the FBI,
the CIA, the NSA, none of them. They chose who
to follow and who to surveil, who to investigate, and
when they put the information in front of a higher
select committee, they chose when to prosecute or arrest. And
so when the fis at courts were suppressed because of
the Patriot Act in two thousand and one and two
thousand and two due to the Twenty Years War, all
the work that had been done in the Church Committee
was rescinded, and so since then they've been able to
do any kind of investigation. Label anybody a terrorist, label
anybody a white supremacist, any anything you can think of,
and it's been that way and they kept it going
until this day. So hopefully Trump changes that. But this,
this overreach is just it's way more than Hoover ever had.
Speaker 1: So when do you decide that, Okay, well I really
would like to produce this, I'd like to do a movie,
do a TV series. What causes you to be like, well,
there's just this isn't in the cards and I'm probably
just gonna have to go to writing and go independent.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I mean, there's no doubt there is an era of
censorship that's starting to change. I don't know if Hollywood
itself is going to change its nature. I think there's
a separate entity, just like we talked about a separate
political structure, or at least an advocacy structure for people
like us. But years ago, when you'd say stuff like
you know, they're trying to suppress, they're trying to keep
you know, white males and Christians and so forth out
of Hollywood, they laugh about it.
Speaker 2: And so forth.
Speaker 3: But now it's demonstrable. They record people like Veritas Project
and others saying yeah, we're not going to hire any
white males, especially Christians, and I mean, it's obvious. So
either you be you or you speak an act like them,
and if you have the stomach to do that, you
might be rewarded. But looking like this in that town,
unless you call yourself finkelsteiner Bergowitz, it's not going to work.
Speaker 2: It doesn't work.
Speaker 3: So when you cut the cord, well, I mean, like
I said, I cut the cord last year twenty twenty
three January, and I did a whole video about that,
burning the bridge Hollywood. But then people started coming to, hey, man,
you gave up on that, Let's try this, let's try that.
Speaker 2: They don't understand the game.
Speaker 3: You got to raise this money to get this money,
to get this letter, to get that letter in this commitment.
So again, the era of the podcast is now, the
era of the self published books, the era of you know,
getting beyond the gatekeepers is now. So I would say
that if things do change in Hollywood, or the way
of doing film and TV is change during and because
of this administration going forward, then it can be based
off of work that people like you.
Speaker 2: And me do now. But you don't.
Speaker 3: You shouldn't ask for permission to talk about the things
you want to talk about, because you'll offend somebody that
is the head of a studio or a distribution company.
Speaker 2: Screw you.
Speaker 3: I spent I'm fifty, I spent twenty five years doing
that and it didn't work. It does not work. Bowing
to those who want you gone doesn't work. So that's
that was my conclusion, right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And I assume if you are a you know,
not part part of the in group in Hollywood, let's
call them, that, you're going to have to show yourself
in some other way. You're going to have to bow
in some other way. You know. I think about some
of the bigger directors of the last twenty five years,
especially one in particular, who twenty five years really thirty
five years now that you know, it seems like they're
compromised in some way, and you know, photos will leak
out every once in a while that don't really show anything,
but you know, just maybe enough to keep them in
line because they seem like they may be going off
the reservation.
Speaker 2: Right. Yeah, there's a lot of that.
Speaker 3: I mean, if you're in the in group, you can
rape kids and then run away to France like Rum
and Polanski, and they still cover for you and give
you jobs and Academy Awards.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: Now, it's not meant to be a negative thing. The
good thing is is that somebody like me affirms that
this is the reality. And because of the deep political
nature of my research and also the connections to the mafia,
I think there's a valuable lesson there and it applies
to the right wing politic that I mentioned in my
sub stack article that I'm going to turn into a
book after I finish my first volume of the Pelo Chronicles. So, yeah,
the four laws of Mafia power, and I mentioned them
a little while ago, but really those four laws are
really important to understand because asked the question, well, then
who has the right to these tactics? Who has the
right and the ownership of money influence threats of violence
and killing, because when you go to war, you're killing.
So all these guys that try to virtue signal, Oh,
I'd never killed anybody to have power. Well would you
kill a guy trying to hurt a bunch of kids? Well, yeah,
well then you would kill, So shut the fuck up.
I mean, you're at this point now where people they
live in a little bubble and they want to take
these little presuppositions to what they think their virtues are,
but then it changes the minute they're in a different situation.
If you say that your virtues are consistent, it should
be that you don't always have to take a life
if you're in a good war, if you're in a
good cause. Defending yourself, how is it any different than
defending yourself in your house as somebody breaks in, you'll
justify that, You'll go get your shotgun for that, for
defending your your money and your artwork and your stuff
in your house and your kids. But you won't defend
your entire civilization from being destroyed and overrun. So what
are we talking about here? So it's not a it's
not a universal principle and a universal ethic and a
universal politic if you don't have access to all of
those tactics and all of those ethics everywhere all the time.
Otherwise it's not universal. It's subjective. So does that mean
your only tactic is killing? I mean again, these are
methods of soft power. But here's the thing. You may
not want to influence, pedal, or hurt people, or speak
dirty words or threaten with violence. You know, get out
of my house or we're gonna put you down, But
guess what the enemy does and a lot of other
bad people that just want to steal from your house
and get, you know, crack money. So if there's others
willing to do that too, you have to also be
willing to go to those links to defend yourself the innocent,
your friends and family and so forth. So when people
put it into that perspective, you realize that if you
step onto the field of politics, even as an innocent civilian,
let alone an actor involved with power, you'll eventually be
met with people and saying yeah, well I don't want
you to have that power, Well, yeah I want it.
Speaker 2: No, you're not gonna have it.
Speaker 3: In fact, I'm gonna make sure you're investigated for this,
that and the other.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna call you a Nazi, I'm gonna call you racist.
Speaker 3: You'll spend hundreds of thousands of dollars defending yourself, and
then they'll train you dry and you simply can't afford
it anymore, and you'll be proven innocent. But then you're
out of money and you can't do anything anymore. You're broke,
and then your wife hates you because you did all
that over what right you got to make sure that
you don't do things alone. That's why it's so important
to be part of a group. That's a problem with
these limitarians. A collective power, it's it's anti you know,
anti freedom. Collective power is powerful. The individual can do
nothing on his own. You have to have your own
mafia or I should say group.
Speaker 2: You have to so.
Speaker 1: Well when you start digging into it, okay, so.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of people would say that if
you if you are motivated by a certain impulse and
that you want to start, you want to manifest it,
and probably one of the easiest ways to do it
would be to start locally, county level, city level things
like places like that. I mean, it's it's a lot
easier to get elected to your local city council than
it is to get elected nationally. It just costs a
lot less. And you know people, you can talk to
people when you go to the store. How does knowing
these laws, knowing how power works, do you even how
would you even suggest to start?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Well, uh, well, the first thing is if you're not
aware of the tactics of the enemy, you shouldn't even start.
I won't say his name, but a friend of mine
that knows a lot of people didn't know that the
people that were running against him because he's running for
local political office. Guy makes a lot of money, like
a million and a half dollars a month. He has
a manufacturing for building in the US. I forgot the company.
But the point is is that the guy that was
running against him was backed by the Israeli lobby. And
he began saying, look, I can't just take this. I
have to go research who's doing this to me. And
he starts naming the guys that were after him. And
the minute he went public and started doing press conferences
about naming those guys, he was called an anti Semite.
Speaker 2: He got death threats.
Speaker 3: They called up his contractors he had been doing business
with for years, making money with. They said, they're going
to if this is true and you're an anti Semite
and a Nazi and a pro white supremacist, you know
we're gonna we're gonna stop doing business with You. Would
have destroyed his whole business. So that's the point is
that knowing that you're not involved with gangster activity, you're
not involved with criminal actions, you want to be a
good citizen and go serve the community and help improve
the local area or the state or the country. Knowing
that and then also knowing that these types of people
don't want you to do that. And it's not just them.
Of course he got the uh yet the Muslims of care.
You have other black caucus, you have this caucus, you
have that caucus. There's no representation for white Christian male. Luckily,
Normy conservatives, Conservative inc Are finally calling this out. You
got the elons of the world saying you should be
proud of being German and your German culture and you
shouldn't be ashamed. It's happening more and more so if
anything other than survival, the capitalist pigs are finding out
that white a second, if this whole thing falls down,
I lose my money.
Speaker 2: So once again, excuse me.
Speaker 3: Once again, it's back to square one where even Hitler
talked about mindcomp that the failure of the Pan German
movement was not because of not having a goal to
preserve Germany, but having a goal to preserve Germany and
having peace with enemies through economic means. In other words,
lessen your message, sell out for money. We'll have peace,
but the whole place won't be destroyed through a civil
war and a constant bickering.
Speaker 2: Not what happened.
Speaker 3: What ended up happening is they sold out and they
lost the election right, and that happened during the Weimar Republic.
Of course we know that, but that's the same example
that happens again and again when right wing type of
guys like Patrick buchannan supporter or whatever, wants to go
in the office and they say, look, I'm just going
to lessen my message just to get in, and I'll
make a deal with JCRC or APAK or whatever, and
then you're beholden to those people. So I would say,
after recognizing how the entire political battlefield is, you have
to even before running, in my opinion, you have to
have a pack that agrees with your position, because you're
not going to be able to do anything if you're
sued out of existence, right, and you have to have
people that are willing to hire private investigators to dig
up durting other people and say, look, you're saying this stuff,
so I'm going to release this footage I have of
you going to this hotel with this mistress of yours.
If you don't back off, it sounds dirty and Christians, Catholics,
Protestants don't want to hear that, but you know, this
is how the world works. You know that guy that
you likes so much putin what do you think he does?
Speaker 2: This guy Trump?
Speaker 3: You guys like, what do you think he does? What
do you think Justinian did to beat and take back
the western territory of the Roman Empire after it fell
to the Pagans. You think he just asked him to leave.
The largest spy network in the ancient world was run
by Emperor Justinian. And when he sent him in his army,
his army, they already knew what the enemy was capable
of before sending in military, and that's why they were
able to conquer them with such smaller numbers. So intelligence gathering,
digging up dirt, paying people off. You have to understand
that eventually somebody is eventually going to have to be
paid to not do something. I'm not willing to do that. Well,
then you're not ready to be in politics.
Speaker 2: That's it.
Speaker 3: I'm not going to film somebody and expose them to
hurt their family.
Speaker 2: They're gonna hurt you.
Speaker 3: I know it's shocking for people to hear this, but
this is how the world actually works. This is how
real power is. Okay, nobody got into power by simply
walking in and saying I had the best ideas in
the marketplace, free marketplace of ideas. Mine was just simply
the best, and everybody loves me, and I'm such a
good guy.
Speaker 2: I've never done nothing wrong. That's not how it works.
Speaker 1: Yeah, even if you look at Trump, like the first
time around, he pretty much got elected on I'm going
to I'm going to deal with your enemies, and he
didn't because he wasn't ready for it. And it seems
like this time and even if you just look at
the way he dealt with Columbia yesterday, the president of
Columbia said, turn those planes around. We're not taking our
people back, YadA, YadA, YadA. He's like, okay, twenty five
percent tariffs, Oh yeah, we're kicking all your people out.
You're never gonna be allowed in the country again. And
then after he after the president of Columbia blinks and
backs down, it says I'm going to send planes. Trump
sent his people out into the press to release pictures
of this Colombian president walking around with a quote unquote
trans woman. So a man walking around holding hands with
a man dressed as a woman.
Speaker 2: I didn't know that, but that's awesome.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean that's the way. That's how power is
dealt with. That's why I was a libertarian for i'd
probably say thirteen years because I thought it was I
thought people wanted everything that I wanted. Well, no, once
you realize that people are waiting around to be told
what to do and what to believe, it's like, okay,
well then that's the war. The war is who is
going to tell people what to do and what to believe?
Who's going to tell people the truth about how the
world works. And the only way that you're going to
be able to get something like that is if you don't.
If you're not going to do it in yourself, you're
going to have to find people to do it. You're
going to have to have sarrogates. And those surrogates are
going to need support in some way, whether it's information
but more more importantly money, but information. Information is these billionaires.
And I've learned this from people who've told me this privately,
who know billionaires. When a billionaire learns starts studying something
that none of his fellow billionaires are studying if another
billionaire finds out, they dive into finding out what that
person is studying. It could be anything from like samurai
culture to national socialism. Why why is this person? I
don't want to get left behind. I'm in a game here,
I'm playing, I'm playing to win. I'm in a war here,
and I need all that I can, all that I
can battle with. And that's when you realize it's like
it expecting people to just like roll over and be like, Okay,
we all just want to be free, and we just
I'll leave you alone and you'll leave me alone. Now,
there are people out there who are never going to
leave you alone.
Speaker 3: Right without being conscious of the idea of revolutionary political philosophy,
everybody is already subject to constant flux and change, constant
movement and change. That's the nature of all creation. That's
why I keep on saying, of course, that you know,
you have to know and understand a little bit about
philosophy to understand politics, because it gives you an understanding
of the phenomenal world in which we all interact with.
We don't interact with the nouminal world. We don't interact
with the unchangeable universal principles. We don't interact with the
substantiality of really anything at all human nature. We interact
with the instantiations of humans, right, And so if we
don't interact also with the substantiality of truth, like one
of the ideals that comes down to us from God,
then how how do you manifest that in your own
life and sound and understanding that goodness and badness, goodness
and evil only manifest through hypostatic means, so only you
have control over Christ is not going to come down.
Speaker 2: And do this forth.
Speaker 3: He will work and support through us a success in
anything and any endeavor, like Psalm's one talks about. He
will bless everything that you do.
Speaker 2: And make it succeed.
Speaker 3: And it may not succeed exactly when you want it to.
Speaker 2: But the point is is that.
Speaker 3: People people not recognizing that you are subject to the
fall and constant change leads to the Enlightenment era political
philosophy that says, since that is the case, we will
promote no such thing as a universal sustaining of a concept,
will embrace the constantly changing concepts. And so therefore, since
there are no things that are per we'll get ahead
of the curve and we'll accelerate those revolutionary political philosophies
into place. And so if and this is the founding
of this country, even I don't know exactly who it was,
probably Benjamin Franklin, the Republic should go through revolution every
seven years type of mentality. Of course, the Marxist later
on said every years.
Speaker 2: Actually it's a.
Speaker 3: Constant thing if you believe in that worldview, that paradigm.
So if you're not constantly pushing change, pushing different directions,
like how Maltzi Dung did. One minute he's using the
Red Guard, then he had the Red Guard killed by
the Cultural revolution youth that put him all in prison,
which and killed them. I mean, you wouldn't have had
a China the way it was unless you had the Guard.
Speaker 2: I don't care.
Speaker 3: Struggle against heaven, struggle against earth. Wherever there is no struggle,
find and create that struggle, because out of that struggle
is how the average person is always looking to assert
their place. And so that's why I think social media,
talk radio, democracy people's involvement of chattering and talking constantly
describing what's going on in the week and the day
and everything else.
Speaker 2: It's important to know what's going on.
Speaker 3: But are you providing a solution outside of just pointing
out that these things are going on. If you're not,
you're actually part of what the real ruling class's project is,
which is to have you constantly chasing what they've done
and observe what they've done instead of actually doing something.
So as long as the observing is coupled with nothing
more than reconnaissance so that you can plan what you're
going to do about it, then unless you do that,
then you're just you're part of the revolutionary political cycle.
So we as Catholics, we don't believe in revolutionary political
philosophy because we don't believe the ethics and the virtues
that we base our foundational understanding of the world and
our politic on change. Ever, and it's dogmatic in nature.
So if those things can't change, like the definition of murder,
the definition of fill in the blank, anything, if we
can't change them. Now, if they do change, and we
do say that they're changeable, there were no different than
the enemy. So what are you fighting them for? Just
go and join them. They're really good at that, better
than you. Because you're acting you I'm saying, you're acting
like you're a Catholic Yet you embrace the concept of
revolutionary political change. What are you doing over here? You
don't belong here?
Speaker 2: Get out?
Speaker 1: What do you say to people who will say when
you look at the four laws? So the four Laws
again remind payola, extortion, threats, and acts of violence, killing.
That goes completely against the message of Jesus Christ. So
this you can't we lose down here. That's exactly that's
the You'll read that on Twitter all day from the
e pastors.
Speaker 3: Right, Sorry I was muted. Yeah, you'll hear there all day.
Yet they'll take advantage of the benefit. They'll take advantage
of the benefit of a society like in America that
has a corrupt political class that's gained their power through
those same tactics. And what do they do that They
call them illegitimate, they call them legitimate. People complain about Francis.
He's an enabler of heresy, he's an enabler of the schismatics.
He does this, he does that, blah blah blah blah blah.
Yet you'll turn around and you'll say that he's legitimate.
So if I can murder, cheat, steel, rape, kill whatever,
fill in the blank and get power, whether it's in
the presidency, or I just suddenly find Jesus and I
want to become pope and I kill him all the
way up there by being part of the lavender free
Masonic Mafia. All I have to do is get there
and put on the costume, and then you'll say I'm legitimate.
Because the average person's mind is is that it doesn't matter.
And this is almost a libertarian concept. As long as
you are there, you are recognized to be there, because
ownership is nine tenths of the law.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: Catholics don't look at things that way. A true Christian
looks at it and says, says, I care about how
you obtain that property. So if you obtained a portie
through hard work and you're driving it and you show
your friends though like, wow, you worked hard, you're successful,
you know, good for you, great, wonderful. But if you say, actually,
this is something I've stolen.
Speaker 2: I've had it for.
Speaker 3: Ten years now, your paradigm of the person changes instantly.
You go from having a friend that you respect to like,
you're a thief and I can't trust anything you do.
So how are committing acts, as I've already said, getting
into positions of power that these same people that condemn
us for speaking about these things. Now, I'm not saying
run to the capitol and overthrow people and kill them,
saying I'm saying.
Speaker 2: That that's what you've done.
Speaker 3: That's what you do when you bomb Dresden, Munich, Hamburg, Berlin,
rape and kill kids by the millions, by the tens
of millions. Remember, the German population of Europe was eighty
million before World War Two. They were less than forty
million after. They didn't just commit supaku guys. The Target
of Opportunity campaign has discussed regarding February, which is for
a lot of guys that do this type of thing
called Hellstorm Remembrance Month. It's really taking off now for
a lot of these guys. But they're remembering more and more,
just like how Candice Owens and others that are in
mainstream conservative circles, they're pointing out that, look, for the
good guys, how is it we do that? How does
it we bomb Catholics while they're in church and Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. Why did they choose those Catholic cities? Why
don't they go to Tokyo and Kyoto? Who is involved
with this decision making so if you can commit mass
violations of Geneva Convention Code of Conduct during warfare and
yet you're considered a legitimate ruler, legitimate ruling class, that
what do you care.
Speaker 2: What I do to get power?
Speaker 3: What do you care what I do to get money?
Speaker 2: Do you care?
Speaker 3: And this is the mentality of the mafia, maybe not
the mafia from twelve eighty two, which is a highly
historical you really have to research it. I'm sure Real
Crusades has done something on this, but in the modern
era they have become more of a criminal organization, but
their tactics have changed, their associations have changed since eighteen
hundred onward, being associated with free Masonic organizations.
Speaker 2: But they're the.
Speaker 3: Same mentality in saying that we don't recognize your legitimacy
to power, just like the reason why we had the
night of Vesper's rebellion against the French rulers while you
were sitting during Easter at Vespers they got And I'll
correct my position on this. I said this before the people,
the Sicilians that gathered together to kill the French rulers
under Charles the First of France that occupied Sicily at
the time didn't act until they had backing from Barcelona, right,
So the King of Aragorn at the time, Aragon at
the time, and if I remember right, So when they
had that backing and they went ahead and killed a
bunch of Catholics and Vespers during Easter and that began
a purge that was backed by the King of Spain,
then you realized that and they actually get excommunicated. But
what I said before is that they did not get excommunicated.
Speaker 2: What I meant was they didn't get.
Speaker 3: Excommunicated because of that. They got excommunicated because they moved
against a pope backed king of France and he was
against the King of Spain to do that. So it
wasn't just the Sicilians that did it that got excommunicated.
The King of Spain also got excommunicated. And so there's
a long historical research on that. But the mafia goes
all the way back to that time period where they
were sick of saying, look, these guys are brutalizing us,
they're over taxing us, they're doing this, they're doing that.
How can they be legitimate rulers? So it took time.
They gathered power, they gathered intelligence, they formed little gorilla groups.
They didn't have canons, they didn't have a large army.
They just literally went into people's houses and wented the
church while they were praying.
Speaker 2: And killed them.
Speaker 3: Now, I'm not saying it's the greatest thing in the world,
but it worked. And in the end, after this long
expansive war that went on and it took a long
time to settle, they ended up having their own independent
kingdom of Sicily. It was under the authority of the
King of Aragon, but they had their independence. And we
know that that didn't always stay exactly the same in
Sicily at the time. But the ones who gave power
and gain power were the ones that committed to that
decisive action to chase out people that didn't really belong
there really, And that's my point is that you can
lose legitimacy of authority by the actions you take. I
don't think anybody's ever said that in the past, said
otherwise in the past. Right, you can see corrupt prince
archbishops of Salzburg like Dietrich. He was dispossessed of power
because of having children and all kinds of corruption. You
can have kings that were overthrown because of affairs, excommunicated
because of doing this or doing that. So there comes
a point where people have to realize just because somebody
has power doesn't mean they're legitimate in their power, and
it could be both how they got it and how
they behave after they are in power. But this idea
that look, you know, I'm going to pardon myself and
all my family and everybody else and I'm scott free.
I mean, what kind of a system is this where
you can commit all kinds of crime, steal from the
masses through taxation, and just get off scott free. You're
asking for a rebellion, That's what you're asking for. And
the question is who is going to instigate that rebellion.
It's not going to be the people who think that
that's okay. I'm not saying rebellion isn't overthrow in the government.
I'm saying that you have to have an alternative way
of doing things that's also rebellion, right, and that form
of doing things cannot grow in a political structure.
Speaker 2: And it's not to copy what Curtis Jarvin says. He
stole that from us.
Speaker 3: But the political structure that is possessed by all these
degenerates and people that recognize all methods are okay. Okay, well,
all methods are okay if it leads to a righteous
or a good outcome. So yes, we would use those
same tactics too, but you do it so you can
have Epstein Island. We're trying to do it to preserve
Western civilization and virtue.
Speaker 2: Who's the real villain.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the I guess. The point is is that
most people, the people who would to cry talking about
power and how to get power and what it takes
to keep power are are those who see it as
a blanket evil or as really when it comes down
to it, they really do just want to keep the
status quo. They're they're afraid of change. They're see, the
thing about what they've instituted right now is there's no
You're not responsible for really anything, what you anything you do,
except to the government, except to the state, except to
the regime in charge. What we're talking about. You would
be responsible to your neighbor. You would be responsible to
the people around you. And they're they're much more afraid
of that. They're much more afraid of community, of They're
afraid of private violence. They're afraid of afraid, afraid of
private violence as opposed to public violence. And I tell
people all the time, private violence right now is really
really scary because the people who can get away with
private the people who are doing private violence, most of
them are endorsed by the state that in our tyranny
that we had mentioned. But what we're talking about is
the private violence of you've stepped out of line, and
maybe it won't be violence. You know. Another thing is
talking about the difference between violence and force pressure, where
you can put pressure on people to straighten out and
not do the things that they're doing which damage the
culture of a community of the world. And yeah, I
think that they know that as long as this regime
is in charge, they only have to worry about the regime,
and the regime really doesn't touch ninety nine point nine
percent of us. They really don't care what we do.
But if it goes back to the communities, they can't
keep getting away with the things that they're doing.
Speaker 3: Right, the most unjust person still has a certain amount
of justice in them. And Socrates talked about this in
Plato's Republic, that the cabal of evil men, if they
were completely unjust, they would not have been able to
get together to begin their endeavor, whatever endeavor they were pursuing,
but halfway through their endeavor, it collapses because they can't
keep their hands off of each other, because they're not
completely just. They're so far away from a perfect form
of justice that they just can't stop trying to take
advantage of each other each other. So, if it's like
a gang and they're grouping together to go and rob
a bank, on the way to the bank, they fight
over who gets shotgun, who gets the split in the shares,
and so forth, and so by the time they actually
show up, like Joker at the beginning of Dark Night,
one by one, each one is being killed off until
there's really one or two guys left. The point is
is that, yeah, everybody has a form of justice, but
there's no universal recognition of justice if you abandon what
has created Western civilization. Western civilization attempted to unify under
these these these principles that like Plato and Neoplatonic ideas
knew that were in the newminal world. I can't completely
observe them, but I can in two with them. I
can atto with them because I can see that if
we don't.
Speaker 2: Have a universal principle.
Speaker 3: We can never have a true republic, we can never
have a united kingdom. And if we can't have a
united kingdom, how can you have culture proliferate?
Speaker 2: How can you have peace?
Speaker 3: So, if your goal is peace, your goal is justice,
your goal is goodness, as Saint johna Damascus said, being
higher form of virtue than even justice. Because you're pursuing
an outcome in which you're ready to come. It all
acts to in the means to accomplish that outcome. So
under Christianity we know that a perfect form of justice
is attainable to at least have as semblance of as
much overlap as possible, like in subsidiarity. So you can
have the Habsburgs, and you can have the king of France,
you can have the line of any feudal kingdom and
so forth. You might not be part of the same kingdom,
but if you share a certain amount of Christian virtues,
you know the rules of engagement. When you go into
a battlefield that you're not, you'll get excommunicative, like, for instance,
you get excommunicated by the pope and back then, especially
in the him Middle Ages, if you get communicated by
the pope, he would arrange to have your crown taken
away or at least taken away from your descendants, so
you lose the right of inheritance. And although that's foreign
to us in the modern day, and I don't think
that would work. Obviously, under a corrupt papacy, somebody has
to make somebody else responsible for their actions. So if
a king does become a tyrant, he can't just simply say, well,
I'm the king.
Speaker 2: I could do whatever I want.
Speaker 3: I mean, somebody's going to poison him or kill him.
That happened a lot, but there should be an outside force.
And Paul the Fourth talked about in his Papal Bowl
about how long do you keep the rights to your
jurisdiction as a king, as an emperor, as a priest,
or even a pope. Well, you automatically lose jurisdiction if
you begin acting against not only the principles of the faith,
but also against the church itself. And there's been lots
of corrupt like the Medicese and so forth that have
acted directly against had people killed so they can keep
some of their family members in episcopal positions. How is
that in line with Christ? How is it that Prince
Archbishop Dietrich can have a Jewish mistress and have twenty
kids and build a palace, Mirabelle Palace in the middle
of Salzburg with all the faithful watching it and say
what the hell is going on here? Finally justice is
serve where he's stripped of his titles, stripped of his
he's laisized, and he's if I remember right, And then
he sent to hoen Sulzburg fortress in a prison dungeon
overlooking the town in which he ruled over, and he
died there in his cell and that was a great
punishment rather than just having him executed. But the point
is is that we have to recognize you don't always
need even a good king or good pope or a
good priest to say there's no way that guy's a
legitimate president, or there's no way that guy's a legitimate
governor or a legitimate king, or a legitimate priest or
legitimate whatever. There's it's self evident when a guy's going
and acting against the interest of a country, of a community.
If your brother moved in with you, Peter, and he
started undermining your authority in your house and telling your
kids he should rebel against you, you kick.
Speaker 2: His ass out.
Speaker 3: I would kick his ass out. That's no different when
we have a divided household in our countries and our
are in our religions, in whatever. So people have to
take it upon themselves to be able to recognize some
of these tell tale signs of legitimacy, of authority and powers.
The point, and it's not necessary that we have that
authority and we can assume it ourselves. It's that you
have to well, what are the implications if we don't
have a present, Oh my, oh, what are the implications
if we don't have a king, What are the implications
if the.
Speaker 2: Bishop of New York is not really the bishop or whatever?
Speaker 3: Well, you'll be okay because you have the access to
how to act as a Christian regardless, right, whether you're
in peace or in war, whether your husband, a father,
a friend, or an ally or a compatriot in a wartime.
So we're not without direction, as the point, and that's
what people have to break away from. Not to agree
with the libertarians and total individuality and total atomization. But
men do need leadership, like you said, the problem is
they don't. They don't they'll take leadership from just about
anybody that sounds so like them, but they'll ignore everything
that they've done before to get the power to talk
to them.
Speaker 2: So that's the balancing act.
Speaker 3: You can't be a purity spiraling puritan and negate anybody
that can come into the door. Otherwise none of us
are good enough to lead. But you also have to
recognize if Hakay is saying I'm Catholic, in the next
minute you find out he's gay or whatever. I'm not
going to name names or been doing gay stuff. There's
no you can't lead us.
Speaker 2: Who are you? Well back to square one. Might as
well just stick to what we have now.
Speaker 1: You know, when you look at culture and you see,
like I can think of, people want people want order,
and people want justice, and when you don't get that,
men step up and demand it or take it into
their own hands. I think one of the turning points
in this country that people do not talk about enough
is the Leo Frank case. That was a case where
it was obvious to everyone everyone who did it, even
the klan. The klan who was not didn't get jpilled
until this case. You know, they they had a different
concentration up until that point, and even they went, no,
it's not the black guy. No, it's just one over here.
It's the one over here that has that's been accused
of something. And fifty million dollars in today's money is
pouring in to defend him. And then when he is rightfully,
rightfully sentenced to death and sentenced to death and put
into prison, they pay off somebody to to commute to
commute his death sentence. And a group of people got
together and said, that's not justice. This is the way,
this is the way you do justice. I didn't. I
don't when I judge that. Looking back, I have no
problem with what they did. I think what they did
was actually very heroic. But that can easily turn into chaos.
So you need order from the top down. And you
can look at that case and you can see in
that case, well, I mean, it forms it gives the
ad L the power that they that they exercise for
so long. But you can also see in that case,
if you come forward from that case, you can see
where justice just starts getting stripped away, stripped away, stripped
away to the point where now you you have district
attorneys who will refuse to put rapists in jail to
give murderers longer than two years. And unless you have
a top down, legitimate form of authority that's willing to
do the things that needs to do in order to
keep order, we're you're going to get the chaos that
we have now. You are going to get the potential
for what's coming if Trump doesn't, you know, if people
aren't inspired by what even Trump's done already to get
in line and say, okay, this is the straight line
that we have to walk now.
Speaker 3: Yeah, not to flog a dead horse, but the whole
concept of naming my YouTube channel, podcast so forth, why
we fight is we have to know the foundational justifications
for the intelligibility of our worldview. If we're saying that
we want this, what is that rooted on? And if
it's root on, like you're saying, a top down, shared
universal set of principles that we all have agreed upon.
That was the attempt from a Freemason Protestant perspective with
the Republic of the United States when it first started out.
When you have a constitution that delineates exactly what you
all generally agree upon, you can have a starting point.
If you just say do as thou, well, it's not
a starting point, because eventually it turns into its so
called democracy, and it turns into a tyranny. Tyranny demands
out of that chaos, a council of tyrants, and then
the dictator of the proletariat or the single tyrant. That's
exactly how the Socrates described it. That's how it's happened
again and again.
Speaker 2: So very observe it.
Speaker 3: I believe that case happened at a time or the
Western Christian identity began to wane, and because so many
in the West didn't even think about what the identity
of others were for so long, like for instance, Jews
and the different identity types within the Jewish sphere, they
didn't know anything about it. And as they rose in power,
due to that secular state of the late nineteenth and
early twentieth century, they were afraid to speak even amongst
Catholic groups. And you know, long before the turn of
the twentieth century, Popeye's Tent talked about this quite a bit,
that modernism is already creeping into not only the Church
but Western civilization. Hitler said in mincomt that eighteen seventy
onward was the era in which even the royal houses
like the Habsburgs and in Poland and Prussia, and even
the Romanovs in Russia were working towards de Germanizing the
Habsburg Empire, de Germanizing and the liberal era after the
Franco Prussian War of eighteen seventy, and that took place
all the way up until World War two, all the
way through before War one.
Speaker 2: And after World War one.
Speaker 3: So it's not as if we just get a habsbur
back in office and back in the chair of the
imperial they're gonna set everything as right as rain. They
We were working towards Degermanizing Europe, not just in Germany
but Europe in general.
Speaker 2: Why again, it was the pursuit of peace, for.
Speaker 3: A solidification, a solidification of power, and peaceful means or
economic means to have that piece is the point. But
going back to the Leo Frank case, the point is
that that occurred during that transitional time period where Europe
was moving away from monarchy, the West in general was
going into modernism and industrialization, becoming more and more secular,
and they did not allow usury. They did not allow
bankers at the level that we have now. We didn't
allow degeneracy and so forth. And as that began to change,
a lot of the people that were in control of
that were very much connected to, as I've said before,
Jewish mafio, so ghettos that ran illegal numbers operations, charged interest,
something that wasn't allowed anywhere in Europe, anywhere in America
until some of these other groups began to get more
and more power and raise more money through banking and
so forth. But the point is that the Frank case,
I believe needs to be looked at very carefully, because
a lot of guys on the right want to just
say every Jew is responsible for that. I think it's
a very dangerous position because what you end up doing is,
at one minute, some of these guys that want to
say want to worship Hitler or worship the Third Reich,
or study the Third Reich, they come to understand his
personal driver, Emil Maurice was a Jew. His personal doctor
forgot his name, he was Jewish. You had SS officers,
you had party members, you had field marshals, commanders, admirals,
all types, hundreds of thousands that served in the Wehrmacht
in the SS, and then you had literally millions more
living peacefully because not.
Speaker 2: All of them were Communists.
Speaker 3: Who were locked up were the communist actors, and it
wasn't just communist Jews, it was Communists Catholics like father
Alfred Delp and others that were involved with terrorism like
Operation Valkyrie, the Chrysal Circle that Delp was involved with.
So the point is is that there was a time
where yes, literally Hitler embraced Jews and even gave half
in full blood of Jews a passed and gave them
honorary Aryan citizenships so that they could be inducted into
the party and so forth. What you have then is
guys going around in dissidence spheres on Telegram and other
social media and saying, well, he made mistakes, so now
you know better than the guy that you worship. Right,
It's like you're trying to This is the problem with
a lot of these guys. They tried to plan before
they ever do anything. So victory is assured, you know what,
you have to go out into the world and do things,
touch grass and do things and doing so, just like
when you train to martial arts, when you go shooting,
when you weightlift whatever, you're gonna get hurt. You're gonna
get injured, You're gonna bump and bruise yourself, You're gonna
have all kinds of problems. You'll have fights with people,
and sometimes those people can become your friends. But you're
not gonna do anything unless you get out into the world.
And so trying to just say I'm not doing anything
until I have victory assured, it's just a retarded, stupid position.
So imagine posting Hitler memes and the next minute saying
Hitler got it wrong. It's like you don't even know yourself.
Have you ever read mindcomp Have you ever studied all
the speeches or Mussolinese fascist writings? Have you ever read
any of those things? Have you read Locke, have you
read Hume? Have you read a manual?
Speaker 2: Kant?
Speaker 3: Dig into political philosophy, because you'll understand that it is
almost impossible to find universality in everything, including the universal Church,
which is Catholicism. You think everybody in the Catholic Church
or in the clergy believe the same exact thing on
every single doctrine. So yes, universality is the goal, but
it's almost impossible. But you cannot. And I'm not saying
go out and make alliances with Zionists that say, you know,
we want to get rid of Emelek. But guess what,
not all of them believe that. Okay, So don't be
a lazy minded person saying all Jews want to wipe
out all white Christians and so cast them all into
the fire. I mean, it's just a retarded, lazy mind position.
Speaker 2: So just be very.
Speaker 3: Careful because that's also going to destroy your ability to
act politically in the public space at all, even in
an era like this. That's pointing out a lot of
things that we've been talking about for years. So younger
guys that might hear this, you got to remember that.
So of course their response back is going to be, Okay,
you you're this, that your other. But again, what was
happening in the thirties and forties.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, I was going to ask another question.
We go wait for that for another day, because I
don't know, I don't think there's a better place to
end it on than that that little speech gave right there.
So I know you've got stuff to plug, and I
know you're really trying to ramp up the creating the
content that you are, So yeah, talk about talk about
how anybody can help you.
Speaker 2: Thanks brother.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so right now I am, yeah, definitely working on
my substack and trying to get some more podcasts out.
But the past two weeks I've been really working on
taking my original screenplay for the TV series of Pala,
and I'm turning it into a novella type of release.
I'm going to have an introduction, commentary and forward by
some of the guys that I've dealt with for years,
and introduction to explain the entire worldview and how I
came across these people, kind of like how I just
talked about with Jimmy and Tommy and so forth. But
you'll see the raw screenplay version as the original one was,
and how many endorsements I got from so many people
regarding its content, and you'll see the general direction of
what the Pale of Chronicles is what I'm calling the
book series. If there's enough enough of a response, especially
after the season one, episode one through ten is done,
then I'll turn it into a full blown book series.
This is to point out from the nineteen fifties onward
the collusion the Mafia and the CIA had in culture
change through Operation mocking Bird and so forth, and it's
called Paleo Chronicles how the Mafia and CIA created the
rock and roll business. So it wasn't just about the
rock and roll business. It's about a lot of different
parts of American life at that time. And after I
get the volume one of that done, I'm going to
start on the Four Laws of Mafia Power as a
expansive book on political philosophy and what we've been talking about.
So yeah, I'm trying to do all that and work
and do everything that we all are trying to do
normally too, but this information has to get out. It's
not just about doing a TV show. It's right now
at this time. People have to recognize that and the
ability to try to make America great again.
Speaker 2: You have to harken back to a time.
Speaker 3: Where we were strong, but not just strong in the
sense of our own values, but also how do we
get that strength? And unfortunately people have to recognize these
types of things were used, these tactics were used to
get that kind of power.
Speaker 1: So yeah, all right, just provide me with any links
you want. I'll put them in the show notes and
people can check it out.
Speaker 2: I appreciate each other. Thank you, Thanks brother,