Speaker 1: Ready to go, and I might even be five minutes early.
Speaker 1: That's okay. We got an intro to play, so I
Speaker 1: gotta put a name on this one. Okay, Now, hopefully
Speaker 1: because I downloaded the damn thing, it's not gonna cause issue.
Speaker 1: I'm literally so I'm not like jumping up and down. Hey, everybody,
Speaker 1: is what we're going to do today. So I'm gonna
Speaker 1: play a few different things. I'm gonna show a few things,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna read a lot of things, and I'm going
Speaker 1: to make a couple of suggestions, not recommend, whatever the
Speaker 1: hell you want to call them. I don't care what
Speaker 1: you want to call him. You call it whatever you want.
Speaker 1: Hold on, I gotta cancel that out and find this again. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this might be a little gonna play it for me.
Speaker 1: Now this is gonna get stepped on because I'm not
Speaker 1: sure what's up with the if it's the board, if
Speaker 1: it's rumble itself. So music has high points and low points, Well,
Speaker 1: this thing suppresses it. So I don't know why it
Speaker 1: does that, but it sounds like an old record player.
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you ahead of time, not old record player,
Speaker 1: I worn out cassette tape. There we go, that's a
Speaker 1: better way of saying. But this will set thing, set
Speaker 1: the tone pretty well. Here. I'll leave the captions on
Speaker 1: so you can read what it says, because I think
Speaker 1: that's important that we do that. And I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: make sure that everybody is a rocket and rolling in
Speaker 1: all facets. And I am over on if TJ Media
Speaker 1: opening that up scheduled live event. Well, I'm already here,
Speaker 1: So it happened. Okay, that the reset that I think
Speaker 1: they're so weird. Oh, here we go. They create a
Speaker 1: second one. It's it's not the it makes no sense
Speaker 1: to me. But I'm just gonna drop it hello in there,
Speaker 1: and then I will find the the I'll do that
Speaker 1: right now. I'll get the links so that if you
Speaker 1: want to come in they can. Let's see it says
Speaker 1: cloppy link require approval. Yeah, I guess that's probably a
Speaker 1: good idea. And where are you FDJ?
Speaker 2: There?
Speaker 1: You are too many, so many of these old things
Speaker 1: are Oh did the last one not even post? I
Speaker 1: said hello when it's not even in there? There it goes.
Speaker 1: It only took twenty minutes. Yeah, it did it as
Speaker 1: I was tucking about it. Wow, that's super slow, super slow.
Speaker 1: I just refreshed my computer, so I know it's not that,
Speaker 1: but man, I'm still waiting for the one I just
Speaker 1: clicked even pop up. I could do a lap around
Speaker 1: the block wait for that thing to post. What the hell?
Speaker 1: All right, we're gonna have to refresh this because I
Speaker 1: even see that thing over there in the corner is spinning.
Speaker 1: Something's not right, something's getting lost, it would appear. Why
Speaker 1: am I on discipline? It's not even the right that's
Speaker 1: not even the right picture. Wow, all right, Well we're back,
Speaker 1: and it still can't figure out how many people are watching.
Speaker 1: It's just spinning. Something is not good. Over on FTJ
Speaker 1: it's running super super slow. Anybody out there watching it
Speaker 1: from FTJ media who is a a member of the team,
Speaker 1: just an FYI, And that it is still not telling
Speaker 1: me how many people are watching. It can't figure it out.
Speaker 1: It doesn't know what's up. It's spinning and spinning and spinning,
Speaker 1: and uh yeah, so Scott spill all that. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna work too much about it. And over here on
Speaker 1: hey rumble rocking and rolling over here. Nice, here we go.
Speaker 1: We're gonna play this real quick. I wish I wasn't
Speaker 1: on the screen as well. It's just the way it is.
Speaker 1: They gotta work on that. I told Rumble that they're
Speaker 1: consider Richard. Okay, sure you will the bangy. Hey, guys,
Speaker 1: this is awful, right, this is not I don't I
Speaker 1: don't condone this imagery at all. You have to click
Speaker 1: a button in order for you to watch this video.
Speaker 1: It's viewer discretion advised. It's sickening some of the imagery.
Speaker 1: And honestly, if it wasn't for the fact that I
Speaker 1: don't know if people would actually listen to it. If
Speaker 1: I didn't do it this way, I wouldn't be doing
Speaker 1: it this way. Why am I seeing the picture in
Speaker 1: picture here? Why am I seeing that? I don't understand
Speaker 1: what's happening? Hold on, what's that? Why is that? There?
Speaker 1: There goes.
Speaker 3: Your mouth of entergy.
Speaker 1: All let's see if you can still see it. You
Speaker 1: can maybe, Uh, when you get towards the end of it,
Speaker 1: we'll do the other side of it. So I have
Speaker 1: it without those on there, bud litter, Let's just do this. Oops.
Speaker 2: She generated by a nuclear explosion is enormous.
Speaker 4: After a massive enemy attack, millions would face.
Speaker 5: That this broadcast brought to you. Bye Jump quite fine
Speaker 5: with the fishes. It's never been so yummy.
Speaker 6: Time is money and money is time.
Speaker 7: We wasted every second time. A Dias boy shrinks.
Speaker 8: Seven downs and flags and plastic surgery.
Speaker 9: Paijupson, Molly and lay have moved on, signal a fine
Speaker 9: un curtain, calidall atomic.
Speaker 10: Bunch of trees, last.
Speaker 11: Disease you kill find our words display minus.
Speaker 10: Money away, Lady.
Speaker 7: Preci to say our heads.
Speaker 12: Like that.
Speaker 6: Where minus money money is.
Speaker 13: Time wasted every SACas time.
Speaker 14: A molosicis fancy for motorica and plastic surgery. I got
Speaker 14: friends and breeds, mom out and.
Speaker 10: Stamp boot sale.
Speaker 7: The final curtains knowledge.
Speaker 13: Atomic past trees, brownbiously mo him him, hoorah, what a glory,
Speaker 13: a despair melt, the joyous has a way under the
Speaker 13: Marsham clocking.
Speaker 11: Pay him him, pray for this five hours, spray the
Speaker 11: finest bodier doll way, shame.
Speaker 10: Hares skill like never grown, and a time is money.
Speaker 6: Money is time.
Speaker 8: We wasted every second dime. A Dias lawyer shrinks and
Speaker 8: absent flags and plastic surgery. Now really lolcome major Tom
Speaker 8: and layer have.
Speaker 6: Signaled a fine uncert.
Speaker 1: Atomic Okay, Now why did I show that anybody gonna
Speaker 1: talk over on rumble or what's up? What the hell?
Speaker 1: Why is it saying that there's zero people there when
Speaker 1: there's not zero people here? Okay? Why is this all
Speaker 1: messed up? And I'm streaming correct? Let me just check
Speaker 1: that it would appear that I am. Yeah, yeah, all
Speaker 1: the counters are wrong. Why is that happening? This counter
Speaker 1: is still spinning? What causes that? It's the wrong? Everything there? Okay?
Speaker 1: Now I have a counter on FTJ. It's not the
Speaker 1: most promising encounter, but it's there. It's not saying that
Speaker 1: there's a whole lot going on. But let's see if
Speaker 1: I do this, if everything stays the same, Yeah, it
Speaker 1: looks like we're still good. It doesn't look like I'm
Speaker 1: being hidden. Something weird is happening. There's been a lot
Speaker 1: of stranger just going on in the internet the last
Speaker 1: couple of days.
Speaker 5: Huh.
Speaker 1: I don't understand why that's showing me? Whoops? Why did
Speaker 1: they just back up? All right, I'm just gonna leave
Speaker 1: it alone. I can see people over here. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: do a test over here and see there's a hello
Speaker 1: to everybody over in the way. Is it clicking out?
Speaker 1: Of my new one pressed up? But when is happening? Okay,
Speaker 1: so we're just gonna move on here. Wow, there's so
Speaker 1: many pop ups. I've had them all suppressed, but yet
Speaker 1: they still come. Thank M. All right, now I have
Speaker 1: a couple of clips here. I think the we just
Speaker 1: get off get started off here with a slightly different intro. Today.
Speaker 1: It's an old one, very old, very old. Then maybe
Speaker 1: a little more after that. I can remember which one
Speaker 1: it was. I think it's the rare intro. Do you
Speaker 1: guys know what this represents?
Speaker 6: Well, I don't remember.
Speaker 10: Just the college was left.
Speaker 2: Your storm could be coll storm.
Speaker 1: What story did your fat You'll find that, Yeah, you'll
Speaker 1: find out when I start killing everybody. There should be
Speaker 1: a big vaccine strand right there there was. I don't
Speaker 1: know why it disappaired. Anybody who remembers that has been
Speaker 1: watching for a long time.
Speaker 15: Every civilization reaches a crisis point eventual.
Speaker 3: Most of them don't make it.
Speaker 15: Yours do.
Speaker 3: How our son was dying. We had to evolve in
Speaker 3: order to survive.
Speaker 15: So it was only when your were was threatened with
Speaker 15: destruction that you became what you are now. Yes, well
Speaker 15: that's where we are, you say, you were on the
Speaker 15: brink of destruction, and you're right. But it's only on
Speaker 15: the brink that people find the will to change. Only
Speaker 15: at the precipice do we evolve.
Speaker 1: This is our moment.
Speaker 15: Don't take it from us.
Speaker 12: Remember the stories to tell us about the three childamen
Speaker 12: playing fan tan. Someone runs up to him and says, hey,
Speaker 12: the world has come doing it, And the first one says,
Speaker 12: a lot, best go to the mission to pray, and
Speaker 12: the second one says, well, I'm gonna go buy me
Speaker 12: a case of miss Gallon six horse, and the third
Speaker 12: one says, we last shall finish the game.
Speaker 1: I shall finish the game. Doc, there's that, and there
Speaker 1: should be one more than actually could play. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: let's not forget this castle.
Speaker 2: Take the firearms first, and then go to court. I
Speaker 2: like taking the guns early, take the guns, so take
Speaker 2: the guns, So take the guns, So take the guns.
Speaker 2: To take the guns first, go through due process.
Speaker 1: Second, Well, lest we forget, I might not play this
Speaker 1: whole one all the way out. I'm just gonna check
Speaker 1: it out real quick. You're listening to the Ballbusters podcast.
Speaker 6: Yeah no, we will.
Speaker 16: Beat time pretending love me and shot Chas Channing come back.
Speaker 16: So yeah, this boot nothing moon, but we bound them
Speaker 16: right off lot make a new.
Speaker 2: You take it and the make up the fat don't
Speaker 2: want to put the back of these thing a whole gone.
Speaker 16: An your say, wow, you know what the lad I
Speaker 16: feel lot by again, feel down your love.
Speaker 6: Of felling to the ones out bady, gown down and
Speaker 6: you'll have a way because they have a lot of.
Speaker 13: Thank you said that.
Speaker 6: You should have said this inspired juristiction.
Speaker 13: Okay, a one as flat as I have, the punish witch.
Speaker 7: Or a bay.
Speaker 8: B bats three bats, free bats, three bad reread bad.
Speaker 10: Shocked for I can never forget you.
Speaker 5: I can.
Speaker 1: Don't get caught broadcasting out of your ainus stay grounded
Speaker 1: to earth, learn the facts. We now return to Ballbuster's podcast.
Speaker 1: Already in violation.
Speaker 3: I thought that, okay, now we can start.
Speaker 1: There's a few things that I've been going on lately,
Speaker 1: and uh yeah, there's a lot of crazy shit happening too.
Speaker 1: Apparently Kentucky and the Hamptons are burning down. But let's
Speaker 1: go ahead and take a look at this first, because
Speaker 1: this is pretty interesting. I know a lot of people
Speaker 1: look to this gentleman, as you know, he saw a
Speaker 1: voice of reason, right and he says, remember when Fauci
Speaker 1: said a tax on me, quite frankly, our attacks on science.
Speaker 1: That's how Trump, if he's even genuine, sees maga. We're
Speaker 1: tired of playing politics. We want genuine, fundamental change. This
Speaker 1: is Peter Biliciano saying this, and he says, all government workers,
Speaker 1: like the real Don Trump and Representative Toms Massey are
Speaker 1: supposed to be our employees. Episodes like this point again
Speaker 1: to the truth that there is no political solution. Correct now,
Speaker 1: it says Trump, when someone actually puts America first time out.
Speaker 1: And by the way, that guy is a freemason. And
Speaker 1: Trump gave him a Rolls Royce phantom for one of
Speaker 1: his birthdays, three hundred and fifty thousand dollars card plus
Speaker 1: a rhinus, or maybe maybe he gave one to Trump.
Speaker 1: I don't know. He said something like that's like pocket
Speaker 1: change for him or something like that. Maybe it was
Speaker 1: Trump that received the gift. Anyway, Donald Trump's attack on
Speaker 1: Thomas Massey sparks Republican pushback. He says, We're gonna add
Speaker 1: three hundred three two billion, three hundred and twenty eight
Speaker 1: billion dollars to the deficit this year. He says in
Speaker 1: a Monday post on truth Social You know the place
Speaker 1: that you post something that they don't like and they
Speaker 1: murder you with the tool of the FBI. Yeah, that place,
Speaker 1: said he would lead the charge in ousting Massy after
Speaker 1: the GOP lawmaker announced he would not support the Trump
Speaker 1: backed government funding bill. Thank you to the House Freedom
Speaker 1: Caucus for this is Trump babbling bullshit. Thank you to
Speaker 1: the House Freedom Caucus for just delivering a big blow
Speaker 1: to the radical left Democrats and their desire to raise
Speaker 1: taxes and shut our country down. They hate America and
Speaker 1: all it stands for. That's why they allowed millions of
Speaker 1: criminals to invade our nations. Sometimes it takes great courage
Speaker 1: to do the right thing. Congressman Thomas Massey of Beautiful
Speaker 1: Kentucky and Kentucky right now is burning right. Is an
Speaker 1: automatic no vote on just about everything, despite the fact
Speaker 1: that he has always voted for continuing resolutions in the past.
Speaker 1: You know, here's here's the problem. If Massi's following the Constitution,
Speaker 1: everything that you just trying to do is ant is
Speaker 1: going outside your boundaries, going outside your your powers. So
Speaker 1: he's going to no vote it for simply it for
Speaker 1: that reason alone. Because it's not within your power to
Speaker 1: be doing these things. Dying nine point nine percent of
Speaker 1: the time should be primaried, he says in caps. And
Speaker 1: I will lead the charge against him. He's just another grandstander,
Speaker 1: is he, though? Who's too much? You know why he's
Speaker 1: being attacked by Donald Trump for real? Because he called
Speaker 1: out a pack, That's why. And who did remember Addison
Speaker 1: gave hit the wife gave him one hundred million dollars
Speaker 1: for his campaign, and Ed Addelson they actually don't represent
Speaker 1: a pack, they represent a more radical pro Israel lobby.
Speaker 1: And I will lead the charge against him. He's just
Speaker 1: another grandstander who's too much trouble and not worth the fight. Yeah,
Speaker 1: way to try to diminish at the same time, you're
Speaker 1: calling it out as if it is an issue. He
Speaker 1: reminds me of Liz Cheney really before her historic record
Speaker 1: breaking fall loss. The people of Kentucky won't stand for it.
Speaker 1: Just watch well then their self deprecating self destructive idiots.
Speaker 1: If that's the case, Do I have any takers? What
Speaker 1: does that mean? Do I have any takers? Is that
Speaker 1: a call to violence? Trump? What are you saying there? Anyway?
Speaker 1: Thank you again to the House Freedom Caucus for your
Speaker 1: very important vote. We need to buy some time in
Speaker 1: order to make America great again, greater than ever before.
Speaker 1: Unite and when it's not for Americans though, Trump, and
Speaker 1: you know that it's for the people that you want,
Speaker 1: that you the people that you serve what they want
Speaker 1: this country to be, which is going to be just
Speaker 1: another form of communism, because that is what that is
Speaker 1: what the Conservative Party actually is. They lie to get
Speaker 1: to where they need to go, and they do not.
Speaker 1: Nobody follows the constitution. Nobody even tries to. Meanwhile, they
Speaker 1: just said that SBRs short bailed, short bail barrel rifles.
Speaker 1: This is a so we have we have Supreme Court
Speaker 1: judges that are supposed to be like, I don't know
Speaker 1: of a high intellect. Right, this is the thing that
Speaker 1: was written a couple hundred years ago. Doesn't include short
Speaker 1: barrel of rifles. Actually, there's no restrictions on that, because
Speaker 1: the whole point of it is so that we can
Speaker 1: defend ourselves from a tyrannical government, so that we can
Speaker 1: put down something that is malicious and trying to harm us.
Speaker 1: In fact, the only entity that should be armed are
Speaker 1: the people, not the government. At all whatsoever, not even
Speaker 1: a tiny little bit, we should be taking our weapons
Speaker 1: to wars if we actually have a just cause for
Speaker 1: doing such the thing. This whole entire system in society,
Speaker 1: mental concept of what is right and what is wrong,
Speaker 1: is all fucked up. Huse. Republicans are slated to vote
Speaker 1: Tuesday on a continuing resolution that would fund the government
Speaker 1: at current levels through September and prevent a looming shutdown. Dude,
Speaker 1: these people rob you of every single penny. They don't
Speaker 1: actually need anyone to agree on anything, because if it's
Speaker 1: in the interest of the banks who actually own this territory,
Speaker 1: this economic territory, it'll just arrive. It's got nothing to
Speaker 1: do with you'd pay in your taxes. The only way.
Speaker 1: The reason you're doing that is so that you can
Speaker 1: show that you're obedient and that you through your consent,
Speaker 1: your wilful consent, you are paying for your very destruction
Speaker 1: and the destruction of absolute strangers that are innocent of
Speaker 1: any crime. That's what taxation is for. It's for the
Speaker 1: fucking ritual. This freaking saturd and continues on and on
Speaker 1: annually getting you to re what do you call it,
Speaker 1: update your your membership and pay your your your membership fee,
Speaker 1: and that is what your taxation is. It's your tithing.
Speaker 1: It's not even going to an entity that would be
Speaker 1: considered governmental and any in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 5: See I m F.
Speaker 1: I think it's goes it goes to freaking Puerto Rico,
Speaker 1: and then it goes off to wherever if that's even true.
Speaker 1: Due to the GOP's razors and majority in the way
Speaker 1: in the House, mass GOP is yeah, you're handled prostitutes.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm. Massey's opposition could be could prove crucial. Speaker
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson, a complete polar opposite of Thomas Massey, can
Speaker 1: afford to lose only one Republican vote to pass the measure,
Speaker 1: presuming all two hundred and fifteen Democrats vote no. Well,
Speaker 1: they're not gonna because that's not how that works. So
Speaker 1: it doesn't really matter. It's not an issue. They just
Speaker 1: want to They just want to call out Massy because
Speaker 1: they're going to build up a public perception of this
Speaker 1: good man and make him out to look like an asshole,
Speaker 1: and the American public feeding frenzy of little freakin retarded
Speaker 1: piranhas will do will follow the lead the Court of
Speaker 1: Public opinion is what everything is based on. That's the
Speaker 1: only vote that they're actually concerned with is when they
Speaker 1: do things of a dramatic measure, that you are, you
Speaker 1: have your tacitly agree and you're and you're emotionally involved,
Speaker 1: and that you respond and react in a predictable in
Speaker 1: a predictable way, just like shepherds sheep dogs to a herd. Stimuli,
Speaker 1: Stimuli get them to move in a certain direction. Massy
Speaker 1: confirmed Nondi that he would not support the short term
Speaker 1: spending bill because it maintains federal funding at current levels
Speaker 1: without considering budget cuts overseen by Elon Musk's Departments of
Speaker 1: Government efficiency. That should be simple enough to fix. Trump
Speaker 1: later called for Massi to be ousted from the from office,
Speaker 1: saying he would support any challenger in GOP primary. And
Speaker 1: who the fuck is this asshole? Well, he's the crown,
Speaker 1: He's the silver crown, King of the Torah. Everybody he's
Speaker 1: He's going to bring about the next perim and have
Speaker 1: us all killed. That's where he is for various indirect reasons.
Speaker 1: But there'll be plenty of it, whether it's poison from above,
Speaker 1: poison from an injection. There's gonna be a great thinning
Speaker 1: out of people. There's gonna be another Bolshevik free for
Speaker 1: all coming soon, not to mention famine. Trump previously called
Speaker 1: for Massi to be kicked out of office in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty for attempting to delay the COVID nineteen relief bill.
Speaker 1: Right and again, all bags of fucking bullshit. And in
Speaker 1: March twenty twenty posts on Twitter now called x it
Speaker 1: says on there, I'm not I'm red just reading that
Speaker 1: bar Trump accused Massy of being a third rate grandstander
Speaker 1: who just wanted publicity. Is that what he wants? So
Speaker 1: here's the and this this is probably not even accurate,
Speaker 1: but here's a pretty large sum of money here. Two
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty million, four hundred and seventy three dollars
Speaker 1: and I'm sorry, two hundred and thirty million, four hundred
Speaker 1: seventy three thousand, six hundred and twenty two dollars. That's
Speaker 1: the track APAC independent expenditures and campaign contributions received from
Speaker 1: pro Israel interest groups. So it's not just the apack.
Speaker 1: They're adding the you know, the one hundred million that
Speaker 1: he got from Mattleson's widow. Zero hold on, let's Let's
Speaker 1: go back to that two hundred and thirty million, four
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy three thousand, six hundred and twenty two.
Speaker 15: Zero.
Speaker 1: Let's go back again. Two hundred and thirty million, four
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy two thousand, six hundred and twenty two
Speaker 1: dollars from oive fucking scumbags, murderers, mafia drug runners, human traffickers,
Speaker 1: pedophiles and coplated murderers, satanic cult level murderers, tortures, torturing
Speaker 1: horrifically many children. That's where he takes money from sodomites. Zero.
Speaker 1: He doesn't take anything from the devil. And this is
Speaker 1: his family, and this is what they look like. That's
Speaker 1: a that's a fun little Christmas. She's got a nice
Speaker 1: little loser right there, setting off those nine mill straight
Speaker 1: down the barrel. That's nice. That one's I think there's
Speaker 1: that should be around you right there. And I don't
Speaker 1: think that one has a has a has a mag.
Speaker 1: None of them do. Actually, yeah, I know they don't
Speaker 1: have mags, but it's there.
Speaker 5: You have it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but if you heard that crack, that's my finger
Speaker 1: ever since, uh, you know, I box a little and
Speaker 1: I smashed it up one time, and now I when
Speaker 1: I separate my fingers, like, do that even just a
Speaker 1: little bit, just a little sometimes crack and pop. When
Speaker 1: it first happened, it was excruciatingly painful. Now there's no pain,
Speaker 1: it's just irritating. Police women discussed satanic rituals cannibalism with
Speaker 1: Kentucky inmate. H yeah, that doesn't exist at all, right,
Speaker 1: crush container ship was carrying toxic sodium cyanide. Where do
Speaker 1: you hear cyanide all the time, all the time, everywhere?
Speaker 1: And have you guys seen this? It was kind of
Speaker 1: I think they replay this a lot. I'm sure people
Speaker 1: have seen this, but this, this is what's in your schools.
Speaker 17: It in to serving cupcakes laced with her husband's sperm
Speaker 17: to her students.
Speaker 1: No, I don't know if this is true or not,
Speaker 1: because I mean, this is horrific, namembares and this is
Speaker 1: that freaking AI voice. So do we know if this
Speaker 1: is true or not? I'd like to find though, before
Speaker 1: you go doing crazy shit with this one. So I'm
Speaker 1: gonna pause on that because that's that same voice that
Speaker 1: does the fake narrations this shit all the time. Right,
Speaker 1: Thank our cargo collision in North sea three two casualties
Speaker 1: brought into ports alive? What does that mean? Three two
Speaker 1: casualties brought into portal that doesn't does not even English?
Speaker 1: What the fuck does that mean? It's like jumpling two
Speaker 1: things together. Okay, still saying I have zero on Rumble,
Speaker 1: so something's up. It's just the counters jective. This Rumble thing,
Speaker 1: this Rumble studio is is not very reliable. There's always
Speaker 1: an issue one way or the other. Why do I
Speaker 1: use instead of stream Yard? Probably good question? Because I
Speaker 1: get to play those fun little videos. Or do I
Speaker 1: get to do this reading sometimes and those are fun?
Speaker 1: Maybe that's why, and because I needed the time now.
Speaker 1: It's kind of like just like a habit, right, Technically,
Speaker 1: technically I'm supposed to be able to just go to
Speaker 1: my and I could do this the other way. I
Speaker 1: guess I could use my obs and get rid of
Speaker 1: all the backgrounds so it's just black like I could.
Speaker 1: I could do that if I wanted to. I think
Speaker 1: I things like that. And on this screen it'll show
Speaker 1: the imagery behind me, whereas the other places, I get
Speaker 1: a black box around me. I like seeing it the
Speaker 1: way they show it in like the bigger production videos
Speaker 1: and I'm not sure if they use obs or not,
Speaker 1: but I like it just being the body and the chair,
Speaker 1: not the background. When I'm doing certain things and discussing
Speaker 1: certain topics and showing certain videos, it's just the it's
Speaker 1: just the me, Like that would be perfect. That's a
Speaker 1: perfect way for doing like video game or tutorial type
Speaker 1: stuff to just have you in there. And that's not
Speaker 1: something that's possible with stream Yard because they don't they
Speaker 1: don't have a set so that you can have the
Speaker 1: background coming through on that. So that's why I just
Speaker 1: was trying to find a way to do it because
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not tex savvy when it comes to
Speaker 1: these little ins and outs. Like once I figure out
Speaker 1: how to do something, I'm I'm good at uh applying
Speaker 1: those those uh those things to do other things with, like,
Speaker 1: you know, applying it and coming up with better ideas
Speaker 1: and things like that. But I just first need to
Speaker 1: know how, you know, the concepts of how it works.
Speaker 1: So over on the Patreon, which I recommend everybody be
Speaker 1: going to and subscribing, I read yesterday and I'm gonna
Speaker 1: read this again in case it was towards the end
Speaker 1: of a really long video. So I'm gonna go ahead
Speaker 1: and do this again. I don't know if it was
Speaker 1: Yesterdaday before. I don't even remember anymore. I think yesterday
Speaker 1: I was where working on the hot sauce. So let
Speaker 1: me just read this myth of our times. I don't
Speaker 1: think you can change people's minds or their beliefs. It
Speaker 1: seems that I see it seems that's an observational error.
Speaker 1: It's more like they were encountered with information at a
Speaker 1: time they hadn't fully developed their conscious position on topic.
Speaker 1: So basically what I'm saying is what's inside them is
Speaker 1: just going to come out. So it's not really that
Speaker 1: you're changing anything. It's just you're making them fully, you know,
Speaker 1: pay attention to and make decisions and take positions on something.
Speaker 1: And even if somebody changes their mind on something, it
Speaker 1: doesn't necessarily mean because they're always going to be them
Speaker 1: and it's always going to be rationale to what it
Speaker 1: is that makes them vibe, you know, what's what do
Speaker 1: they resonate with, what makes them tick? So if they
Speaker 1: think that something else is more closer to what they
Speaker 1: you know, consider themselves as and like what they're you know,
Speaker 1: their identity is and what they stand for, then they're
Speaker 1: going to go with that. It's not so much that
Speaker 1: they change their mind, it's just that they're fine tuning
Speaker 1: what it is that represents who they are. Does that
Speaker 1: make sense, But that their outcome was always going to
Speaker 1: be what it matures to be. The spirit of their
Speaker 1: personal truths was in them all along, waiting the proper
Speaker 1: stimulus to bring it to the surface. So if they
Speaker 1: come to a conclusion with the influence of the So
Speaker 1: if they come to a conclusion with the influence of
Speaker 1: your efforts, it was always within their capacity to come
Speaker 1: to that conclusion. To do so, they were just needing
Speaker 1: to be made to think about whatever the topic was.
Speaker 1: And if they reject your efforts, that was always in
Speaker 1: them as well, waiting to be expressed when again, the
Speaker 1: appropriate specific stimulus evoked it. So it's not an awakening
Speaker 1: to it ultimate truth that's attainable. It's an agitation that
Speaker 1: inspires one to profess their views and take a position
Speaker 1: that's the only thing that's possible. It's not an awakening.
Speaker 1: It's more of a pay attention right, or consider where
Speaker 1: are you on this particular topic or mindset. If this
Speaker 1: is true, then there's no true epiphany or Aha moment.
Speaker 1: It's just a maturation, a development of that which was
Speaker 1: already flowing within that person. Again going back to resonating
Speaker 1: with them. So as a person who delivers information to
Speaker 1: others in the age of said, which means the age
Speaker 1: of information, it may not be that we're converting anyone.
Speaker 1: We're just awakening the inner spark of divinity and those
Speaker 1: who have one, and upsetting the vapid and hollow people
Speaker 1: as well, to the point where both will publicly react.
Speaker 1: It's not a great awakening per se. It's a great
Speaker 1: identification categorization. Here's where it gets a little dark, but
Speaker 1: it's something that we must consider. It's the great organization really,
Speaker 1: and I'm not talking about a no noun. I'm saying
Speaker 1: it as an to organize, like it's organizing things right,
Speaker 1: it's not now and like the great organization, like, hey,
Speaker 1: look that's the CIA. I don't mean that. I mean
Speaker 1: it's organizing. It's a great organization. It's in the action
Speaker 1: of that we're essentially helping those who wish to cram
Speaker 1: us into labels by energizing and inspiring others to make
Speaker 1: their position clearly declared. We're helping the malicious threat assessment
Speaker 1: along and separating ideology ideologies by means of genre and followers.
Speaker 1: So if they say if they it doesn't have to
Speaker 1: be you know, accurate. But if they claim that, you know,
Speaker 1: so and so's channel stands for X, Y and Z things,
Speaker 1: and then they say, well, this person follows that channel,
Speaker 1: then they're gonna be like, well, that person is basically
Speaker 1: in a group, right, And if they're in that group,
Speaker 1: then they carry and they also possess or express or
Speaker 1: stand behind those same ideologies that they assume that that
Speaker 1: other person who is presenting the material has themselves if
Speaker 1: it's not one of their own people. I believe we're
Speaker 1: being allowed to carry on believing we're doing something a
Speaker 1: benefit to mankind survival, so that we keep on doing it.
Speaker 1: We're allowed to say what we're saying, speaking truth to power,
Speaker 1: because it's that power that is observing our responses like
Speaker 1: a worldwide confessional. They're getting free labor out of us,
Speaker 1: and we can't help but serve their cause even when
Speaker 1: we think we're fighting the suppression. And then I said,
Speaker 1: what are your thoughts? Joseph said, I think this is
Speaker 1: well said, and I believe it would be excellent prologue
Speaker 1: or introduction to your new book. And thanks for all
Speaker 1: the fish. Does anybody not know what that came from?
Speaker 1: It's a really crappy movie, really a strange obscure movie
Speaker 1: called The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Yeah, I know
Speaker 1: it's probably the book first. I get it, but it's
Speaker 1: not good. It's just even. It's just really corny libby shit.
Speaker 1: But there is an introduction where they talk about how
Speaker 1: the dolphins up and bail on Ameron kind because they
Speaker 1: see shit coming and they don't want to be here
Speaker 1: and around here for it when it happens. So they
Speaker 1: say they try to warn us one last time, but
Speaker 1: it's misunderstood, and they say it's so long, and thanks
Speaker 1: for all the fish. Uh you know what? Mm hmmm,
Speaker 1: it thinks me so slow today? Is this on the
Speaker 1: old screen? Is that dude? Seriously? All right? Ummm mm hmmm?
Speaker 1: Where were at? Kidoes? There we are? You're that one.
Speaker 1: Let's pop up this one. I'll play this one real
Speaker 1: quick by head to the potty chair. Yes, I sit
Speaker 1: in a really tall chair. Uh, good times. You'll be
Speaker 1: able to tell it just from the from the the
Speaker 1: way they frame their thoughts in this that it's super liberal, retard,
Speaker 1: new age bullshit nonsense crap, Right, did I put enough?
Speaker 7: Ad?
Speaker 1: Isn't there? Like I was saying the other day, Southern
Speaker 1: Poverty Law Center, And I was like, well, Southern is
Speaker 1: just an adjective, so it's the poverty Law Center. So
Speaker 1: therefore it's like, if they say we're going to take
Speaker 1: your case, I'm like, you know, I think I'd rather
Speaker 1: have some lawyer who isn't in poverty, because you must
Speaker 1: really suck if you're a lawyer and you're poor.
Speaker 17: It's an important and popular fact that things are not always.
Speaker 1: What the lime sucks unncessary.
Speaker 17: For instance, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed
Speaker 17: that he was the most intelligent species occupying the planet
Speaker 17: instead of the third most intelligent. The second most intelligent
Speaker 17: creatures were, of course, dolphins, who curiously enough, had long
Speaker 17: known of the impending destruction of the planet Earth. They'd
Speaker 17: made many attempts to alert mankind to the danger, but
Speaker 17: most of their communications were misinterpreted as amusing attempts to
Speaker 17: punch footballs or whistle for tidbits, so they eventually decided
Speaker 17: they would leave Earth by their own means. The last
Speaker 17: ever dolphin message was misinterpreted as a surprisingly sophisticated attempt
Speaker 17: to do a double backward somersault through a hoop while
Speaker 17: whistling the star spangled banner, but in fact the message
Speaker 17: was this so long and thanks for all the fish,
Speaker 17: to warn you all all.
Speaker 10: You may our intellect. This might explain so long as
Speaker 10: I grow around your socks.
Speaker 6: The wasn't about to be decoyed. There's no one's getting
Speaker 6: all the noise.
Speaker 8: Despite those astute we got that post heat, especially tiny
Speaker 8: tops in your friends.
Speaker 10: Looks.
Speaker 7: If I had just one last wish, I would like
Speaker 7: contasty fish.
Speaker 13: If we could just change one thing, be more all
Speaker 13: about not torsing.
Speaker 10: So long.
Speaker 1: And then they fly away. Yps So, and I've seen
Speaker 1: it cause you didn't know about it. It's an old movie,
Speaker 1: like twenty years old or so.
Speaker 6: It ure.
Speaker 1: It plays out like something that you would think would
Speaker 1: have been written in the sixties or seventies, the way
Speaker 1: that goes on. Rebecca. He had said, they had introduced
Speaker 1: me to that movie. Really, I know we're dating. I
Speaker 1: don't think I even watched the whole thing.
Speaker 3: We were in a.
Speaker 1: Where really we were at the the pier Santa Monica
Speaker 1: pier At at a person's house and we were watching
Speaker 1: it and then went and walk down that beach or
Speaker 1: something like that. So I didn't really watch the whole thing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: got the gist of it. It's a cookie movie. That
Speaker 1: was about all I needed to see. So four people?
Speaker 1: Is that for real?
Speaker 15: You know?
Speaker 1: I see something else going on in uh. I don't
Speaker 1: know why it's playing though, it should just not be
Speaker 1: doing that. Yeah, there we go, perfect, Yeah, this is ah.
Speaker 1: I'm starting to think that these settings are not working correctly.
Speaker 1: Extreme publicly listed auto recuit this live. I go to
Speaker 1: the user groups and it doesn't seem like it's selected
Speaker 1: for those premiums and we'll see. Maybe it's making a
Speaker 1: liar of a label. I don't know. But again, so
Speaker 1: you know, the chat was moving really slow too, so
Speaker 1: there could just be a logjam going on over there.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm going to get into that book again,
Speaker 1: but there's a couple of different places.
Speaker 5: I want to.
Speaker 1: Read and I want to I want to get into.
Speaker 1: It's not even so much about the John Birch Society.
Speaker 1: It's what does us teach us? And it's not so
Speaker 1: much about this Infiltrator that infiltrator in that particular timeframe
Speaker 1: of the world. It's what does this teach us about
Speaker 1: our what does this? Does this change? What give us
Speaker 1: further understanding? Does this brought in our overall perspective of
Speaker 1: life in this world and this artificial realm, this artificial
Speaker 1: construct and within the real realm. I don't know however,
Speaker 1: way you would frame that. I don't think anybody can
Speaker 1: actually tell you definitively what that actually is. Is this
Speaker 1: all fake? Is it partially fake? Is it a bubble
Speaker 1: within a bubble? I mean, we do have a firm minute,
Speaker 1: but it's almost as if somebody killed the warden and
Speaker 1: now it's like a as they say, as the cliche goes,
Speaker 1: the lunatics are running the asylum and just going back.
Speaker 1: I know, this is kind of a it sounds like
Speaker 1: it's not a real important thing to discuss, but it's
Speaker 1: an It's just a prime example. And it's not the
Speaker 1: fallacy of trying to frame everything that you see as
Speaker 1: this one idea that you have about something either. No,
Speaker 1: this is just an example of how true it is.
Speaker 1: And you just look at the vehicles in our perception
Speaker 1: of things and inspiration because communism is. Their enemies are
Speaker 1: family ties. Right. They hate anything that it supersedes the
Speaker 1: loyalty to in obedience to whatever the hell it is
Speaker 1: that they control. And make the arts ugly is one
Speaker 1: of those precepts, right, Make the arts ugly, make everything uninspired.
Speaker 1: You don't want to look around and see beautiful buildings,
Speaker 1: You don't want to look around and see magnificent works
Speaker 1: of art on four wheels. You don't want people to
Speaker 1: be inspired, because then that activates parts of their creativity
Speaker 1: in their mind, and they they become free minded and
Speaker 1: and and you know, positive high vibration people instead of
Speaker 1: suppressed and beaten down. And you just have to walk
Speaker 1: through one of these classic car shows to really see
Speaker 1: just how much we've lost and even what people's perspectives
Speaker 1: and their concept of good and you know, valuable, What
Speaker 1: do those concepts even mean without without the mystique and
Speaker 1: the and i'm sorry, the the intricacies and in the detail,
Speaker 1: the fine detail that was once in things that we
Speaker 1: made here. And yeah, there's you know, everybody can go
Speaker 1: there's an element of this and that and those corporations
Speaker 1: or whatever that built them even back then. Yeah that's
Speaker 1: probably true. But when there was more real competition, and
Speaker 1: things were kind of still in the prenatal or adolescent
Speaker 1: stage of production, you know, of cars, because there's you know,
Speaker 1: assembly lines and all that. Then you're looking at people
Speaker 1: trying to outdo with the other person and not being
Speaker 1: completely controlled by a larger umbrella corporation that owns all
Speaker 1: of them. And I've made the statement of many times
Speaker 1: is that there's not real competition. If you don't make
Speaker 1: it from this car dealership and this brand, you're gonna
Speaker 1: make it from this one over here, because ultimately they
Speaker 1: all are Black Rock, or they're all Vanguard, or they're
Speaker 1: all State Street. You know, it's it doesn't really it's
Speaker 1: not a real thing. It's not a real competition. This
Speaker 1: is communism, This is mercantilism. This is the government allows
Speaker 1: or whatever you want to call. Government's not really government,
Speaker 1: but the banks will fund and funnel money which not
Speaker 1: even real, into building people beyond natural capacity and have
Speaker 1: unlimited funds so that they can fail upward and destroy
Speaker 1: their competition, undercut people, and then raise their prices after
Speaker 1: that person has been absorbed and destroyed, and then what
Speaker 1: happens for the end user They scale back quality, make
Speaker 1: things cheaper, less inspired, easier to make, less complicated. And
Speaker 1: now they're even taking away the the the very you know,
Speaker 1: heart of the of the thing and replacing it with
Speaker 1: a goddamn battery. Something that can be turn into a
Speaker 1: bomb just by you know, overactivating it, over exciting it.
Speaker 1: They can do They can do that digitally with a command, right,
Speaker 1: they can. They can make it explode and you're in it,
Speaker 1: and they can lock the doors and remotely with you
Speaker 1: when it while it explodes. This is the world we're
Speaker 1: heading toward. Or they can just stop in like in
Speaker 1: Minority Report, Minority Report, and drive you back to where
Speaker 1: in which you came and just and turn off your
Speaker 1: cards so that you can't or you're you know, if
Speaker 1: you're on a if you're on a social credit system,
Speaker 1: you're not even gonna have cash. So if you go
Speaker 1: outside your little boundaries, you're not gonna be able to
Speaker 1: buy food or do anything else. Anyway, All these things
Speaker 1: aren't really that difficult to counter. It's I know, it
Speaker 1: sounds it sounds like it is if you were a
Speaker 1: one man show or a group of like guys who
Speaker 1: were really good you know, field and camp and type
Speaker 1: of like I'm not talking about evading death, because there's
Speaker 1: no way to do that with this technology. But I
Speaker 1: mean simply like, okay, well we can acquire things, and
Speaker 1: it's not though the women folk or the children that
Speaker 1: are suffering because we're living and roughing it.
Speaker 12: Right.
Speaker 1: That's assuming that other things, like other people aren't looking
Speaker 1: to score higher social credit scores and become wealthy in
Speaker 1: the digital fake world by turning you in when they
Speaker 1: see you being I don't know, acting too freely. I'm
Speaker 1: sure there'll be great incentives for not just uh, the
Speaker 1: digital eye, but for everybody's eye to report on you.
Speaker 1: So this is still brewing in the background and it's
Speaker 1: still moving forward, and this is one of those things
Speaker 1: that they're doing so that they can bring about. And
Speaker 1: this is what's so funny. Like I speak out against
Speaker 1: these religions all the time, all three Abrahamic religions, not
Speaker 1: the morality or ethics or the good things that teach
Speaker 1: you how to be a good person that I only
Speaker 1: think are really really even present in the New Testament.
Speaker 1: I think that it's more of like assumption and presumption
Speaker 1: that it's there and a very you know, extrapolated, freaking
Speaker 1: abstract way of looking at passages to read way too
Speaker 1: much into it to say that there was something wonderful
Speaker 1: and profound there. It's more of like common sense, cause
Speaker 1: no harm really is really not that hard to figure
Speaker 1: out and do right by others and your children and
Speaker 1: take care of them. Wow, you know, real hard. But
Speaker 1: what they do with these religions is they have everybody
Speaker 1: who's in it of the Abrahamic faith, thinking that they're
Speaker 1: going to see in their lifetime the coming of this
Speaker 1: imaginary guy that was made up by Jews, whether it's
Speaker 1: their Meshak, which is probably might really be fucking Saturn
Speaker 1: or whatever demon it is that they worship coming who knows,
Speaker 1: and they might come through personification of technology and Ai
Speaker 1: who knows, who knows. I don't know how how weird
Speaker 1: this realm really is, but I've seen some things, and
Speaker 1: I've seen some things firsthand that have me wonder just
Speaker 1: how real this fabric is. And this runout in some
Speaker 1: level of a dream it as it is, but it
Speaker 1: says our future is at risk. Read this thing, I mean,
Speaker 1: it says This third Temple refers to a hypothetical rebuilt
Speaker 1: temple in Jerusalem which would succeed the first and second
Speaker 1: destroyed in five eighty seven BC. See, they can't say VC,
Speaker 1: they have to say BCEA E before Common Era because
Speaker 1: fuck Jesus right and seventy CE respectively. Well, actually, that's
Speaker 1: your story. I don't believe that one of those fucking
Speaker 1: existed either. The idea of a rebuilt third Temple, according
Speaker 1: to their account, is sacred in Judaism, particularly to Orthodox Jews.
Speaker 1: That is, as it is believed that it will occur
Speaker 1: in tandem with the arrival of the Messhaya. Now their
Speaker 1: mess shak is not the same person that you think
Speaker 1: it is, and only then will the sacrificial practices of
Speaker 1: the first and second temple be restate reinstated. What huh.
Speaker 1: Conservative Judaism believes that while the third Temple will be rebuilt,
Speaker 1: sacrificial worship will not resume, and Reform Judaism does not
Speaker 1: believe that in the rebuilding of a third of a temple,
Speaker 1: saying Judaism has evolved further than that. Reform Judaism says no,
Speaker 1: no on the temple. The notion of a rebuilt temple
Speaker 1: on top of sites of the first and second and
Speaker 1: temple them out has been a core part of the
Speaker 1: Israeli Palestinian conflict. Well it's in if I'm not mistaken,
Speaker 1: like I mean, that's Aram. Well there Aram alsif right,
Speaker 1: Dome of the Rock arem al she ref s h
Speaker 1: A R I F Dome of the Rock. This is
Speaker 1: from Preestcraft Beyond Babylon, my book. It's on my website
Speaker 1: semper fry LLC dot com s E M P E
Speaker 1: R f r y l l C dot com. For
Speaker 1: just the link you can get spilled down. You see
Speaker 1: the links to go to Amazon and to Barnes and
Speaker 1: Noble if you want to get them, get it directly
Speaker 1: from them, or you can order it for me and
Speaker 1: I sign it. There's three different versions. There's the this
Speaker 1: is the Barnes version. This is a six by nine.
Speaker 1: Hold on, this is the eight and a half by eleven,
Speaker 1: so like paper, right, printer paper size. This is in color,
Speaker 1: this one is not. This one's in color. This one
Speaker 1: is not. And the hardcover is the same size as
Speaker 1: this one right here that I'm holding up. But it's
Speaker 1: hardcover and it's still it's nice glossy pick pages and
Speaker 1: it's also in color. Oh and since we're on the topic,
Speaker 1: and maybe I'll wait till I get to it, because
Speaker 1: we have to dress a little, a little soap opera
Speaker 1: nonsense that's going on across some and I don't think
Speaker 1: it's real, honestly, and if it is, it's kind of gay, stupid,
Speaker 1: ridiculous and a waste of our fucking time. And it's
Speaker 1: too bad that there aren't more people listening on FTJ
Speaker 1: because this kind of concerns them most. But I'm guessing
Speaker 1: that there's somebody else on at the same time, might
Speaker 1: came out tonight, and it might actually be Davis. I
Speaker 1: think this is his regular time. If that be the case,
Speaker 1: that be the case, tis what tis. I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to pull away from others. I'm just this when I
Speaker 1: had time to do shit, and I'm not I'm not
Speaker 1: sitting around waiting until later on because then I'll be
Speaker 1: too tired. I gotta drive tomorrow, all right. So let's
Speaker 1: just show you this right now, because somebody said something
Speaker 1: and they made this statement like about logos because it
Speaker 1: happens to be part of some fucking piece of shit's
Speaker 1: name of his channel. Okay, I wrote this in twenty twelve,
Speaker 1: two thousand and two. Can you see it? Says logos
Speaker 1: a mock epic. That is my real name. You'll fuck yourselves. Okay,
Speaker 1: So logos a mock epic the very first page I
Speaker 1: get to it. So I took philosophy in college. This
Speaker 1: is coming from my philosophy book, and I had a
Speaker 1: really good teacher. Logos a complex Greek word associated with
Speaker 1: the philosopher Hairclitis. Haircletian logos is both an account of
Speaker 1: reality and that which is revealed by an account. The
Speaker 1: logos is a fundamental reason for things being as they are.
Speaker 1: It is the fundamental principle of the world. Douglas J.
Speaker 1: Socio he should have been a sociologist or a sociopath.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna read that one more time, because people will
Speaker 1: say a lot of things and be like, Oh, it's
Speaker 1: to this, and it's that, it's the voice, and it's
Speaker 1: a word, and and it's all very remedial, low comprehension
Speaker 1: ways of expressing what logos means. This one is a
Speaker 1: better understanding of it. A complex Greek word associated with
Speaker 1: this philosopher Hereklitis. Herocletian logos is both an account of
Speaker 1: reality and that which is revealed by account. The logos
Speaker 1: is the fundamental reason reason for things being as they
Speaker 1: are is the fundamental principle of the world. I've ever
Speaker 1: come across a better explanation of logos, And this is
Speaker 1: a what I made. I made something that was like
Speaker 1: a a novel screenplay. So it's a little bit of
Speaker 1: both the way it was the way it was formatted.
Speaker 1: But you see how you can see, like the names
Speaker 1: and all that. So it lost stage direction because I
Speaker 1: wanted to be the one who did it if I ever,
Speaker 1: if it ever became a thing. But there it is.
Speaker 1: It says comedy and tragedy. It is how life really is.
Speaker 1: Nothing is ever all stacked on one side of the scale.
Speaker 1: You will laugh, you may cry, and you will relate,
Speaker 1: for this is a human epic logos, a mock epic. Okay,
Speaker 1: we already talking about some psychopaths and their Judichit right, Okay,
Speaker 1: let's do this conservative Judaism, believers before Judaism, saying that
Speaker 1: Judaism has evolved further than that, the notion to rebuild
Speaker 1: the temple on top of side. So like ya, I
Speaker 1: was saying the Haram al Sharif, which is where we
Speaker 1: were at. I think I just took this kartaut of
Speaker 1: what that was and put it in the others. But
Speaker 1: instead that's great. Sure, it's not gonna be hard to
Speaker 1: find though. That's what it is. The Holy see. We
Speaker 1: need to talk about that too. And still in the
Speaker 1: foundation is not the same as the Dome of the Rock,
Speaker 1: but it's very it could be. It could be alluding
Speaker 1: to the same thing, which is kind of interesting, Okay.
Speaker 1: The Dome of the Rock Doom of the Rock, also
Speaker 1: known as the Temple Mount or Harm Al Sharif, is
Speaker 1: located in the Old City of Jerusalem and contains within
Speaker 1: its structure a large rock believed by the both the Muslims, Jews,
Speaker 1: and Christians, by all of the three, not both both
Speaker 1: the Muslims, that's both would be two. I'm not sure.
Speaker 1: Did I fuck up that oops to be the rock
Speaker 1: Ibraheim or Abraham? Okay, yeah, I see what I did there.
Speaker 1: I was talking about the Muzzoms and the Jews, and
Speaker 1: then I threw in the Christians after the fact, right
Speaker 1: brought his son Isaac to be sacrificed. Psychopath with voices
Speaker 1: in his head decided he was gonna kill a son
Speaker 1: when he was all high on drugs. Yeah, that's pretty
Speaker 1: much the story, and that's who they based three religions
Speaker 1: off of, because they're crazy, and he was conducting rituals
Speaker 1: exactly the way the Edenites were three thousand years prior,
Speaker 1: because they don't change. I question any religion whose basis
Speaker 1: is on a man who would betray his own child's
Speaker 1: trust and their love to please the voices in his head,
Speaker 1: or any voice outside of his head for that matter.
Speaker 1: This is also the site that the Musulman Muslims, that's
Speaker 1: what they call themselves. Other people refer to them as Mussulman.
Speaker 1: The Muslims believe is the bait Allah or house of God,
Speaker 1: where their prophet Muhammed went for his ethical night journey,
Speaker 1: where he ascended into heavenly spheres. Yes, I'm sure he did. Psychopathemic, murderer,
Speaker 1: little schizophrenic, just the right type of person you want
Speaker 1: to be leading a religion and going into heavenly spheres.
Speaker 1: And that sounds a little bit Gnostic to me, even
Speaker 1: though gnostic isn't a thing. But the seven levels apparently
Speaker 1: you need to have a password to get through those
Speaker 1: two got to write that shit down. You forget. You
Speaker 1: don't to be, you don't want to be like h
Speaker 1: you don't want to be like, uh, Bruce Bruce Campbell
Speaker 1: an army of darkness, klatau ferata necktie. Then try to
Speaker 1: pick up the economic on shit happens.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 1: It's the oldest standing religious building of Islamic construction. It
Speaker 1: is not a mosque, but rather a shrine and tender
Speaker 1: for pilgrimage. It's not a mosque. So there's a rock
Speaker 1: in the ground. They put a dome at the top
Speaker 1: of it. Ah, right, exactly, wonderful people. There are retaining
Speaker 1: walls on all sides of the plaza where the shrine
Speaker 1: structure housing the rock still embedded in the ground is
Speaker 1: exposed to this in the center. The oldest of these
Speaker 1: retaining walls is said to have been laid on the
Speaker 1: orders of King Herod quite the follow character. So we're
Speaker 1: told additions and renovations to these walls have been added
Speaker 1: over time. And that's another thing too, When we hear
Speaker 1: these disparaging things, it's like, well, who's actually giving us
Speaker 1: this detail? And would they not say things negative about
Speaker 1: certain things simply because it stood in their way of
Speaker 1: their own plans domination and complete and total manipulation of
Speaker 1: other people, Because that's the part they don't like, and
Speaker 1: then they cry, you know, you try to give him
Speaker 1: a fucking shower, and they tell you that, they tell
Speaker 1: the world that they've been gassed for eighty years. The
Speaker 1: view on this location, the views on this location from
Speaker 1: the Jewish perspective, is that it was built upon the
Speaker 1: ruins of the Second Temple. Yeah, sure it was, And
Speaker 1: to some that is even the site of both the
Speaker 1: first or Solomon's Temple and the Second Temple. It's doubtful
Speaker 1: to me that there was a Solomon's Temple at all.
Speaker 1: And I see it more cryptic. I see it more
Speaker 1: as cryptic story, as a cryptic story relating and magical
Speaker 1: working than a literal temple. Meaning it's a freaking grimoire
Speaker 1: that you're reading in people who are taking it literal
Speaker 1: to what God was Solomon building a temple? To what
Speaker 1: God was Solomon building a temple to that he needed
Speaker 1: to elicit the help of demons, seventy two of them
Speaker 1: to be exact. The Second Temple quote unquote is said
Speaker 1: to have been destroyed in seventy a d. By Titus,
Speaker 1: when Rome reclaimed Jerusalem under the ruler Vespasio or Vespaedian.
Speaker 1: There's a whole long trail. We could go down discussing
Speaker 1: Flavius Josephus, the spared Jewish turncoat, whom Vespasian adopted and
Speaker 1: made his court historian, especially when you get into just
Speaker 1: the basis of religion, especially if we get into the
Speaker 1: work of Joseph Attwill, who I should totally have on
Speaker 1: the show, by the way, Caesar's Messiah, the work of
Speaker 1: Joseph Atwill, Caesar's Messiah. I explore everything. It doesn't mean
Speaker 1: I agree with every explanation I encounter. There's another interesting
Speaker 1: book by Ralph Ellis called Jesus King of Odessa, which
Speaker 1: would likely rouse suspicion in most given that it seems
Speaker 1: to you in part the story of Tamouse with Jesus,
Speaker 1: and because Ralph himself is a high degree freemason, which
Speaker 1: leaves the question does the book mean something else to
Speaker 1: the adept who knows the secret language of the mystery schools.
Speaker 1: The Stone of Foundation described in the passages by Albert
Speaker 1: Mackie say that it was the stone upon which Abraham
Speaker 1: had intended to sacrifice Isaac. When you look at the
Speaker 1: enormous size of the rock at the Dome, it definitely
Speaker 1: wasn't Jacob's pillow, nor is it small enough to fit
Speaker 1: under the throne chair of a king. Nevertheless, both the
Speaker 1: stone of foundation and the rock at the dome claimed
Speaker 1: to be the intended place where Isaac was to be sacrificed,
Speaker 1: making at least some kind of connection if Abraham of
Speaker 1: a sorry, if Abraham went there to sacrifice the son,
Speaker 1: it would fit the biblical description of a mountain he
Speaker 1: had to ascend with Isaac to get to his chosen spot.
Speaker 1: The dome of the rock or temple mount is at
Speaker 1: a at the highest point of Mount Mariah in Jerusalem, Palestine.
Speaker 1: Here's where the site the temple, Mount Herim al Sharif
Speaker 1: becomes very relevant to current events at the time I write,
Speaker 1: at the time I write this book, which today is
Speaker 1: November eight, twenty twenty three, a month after the Hamas attack,
Speaker 1: and I quote put quote quote Tamas. I didn't just
Speaker 1: buy that, I just put it in quotes. Today I
Speaker 1: received a Aretz Israel news email stating that it had
Speaker 1: been thirty three days since Hamas killed at least thirteen
Speaker 1: hundred Israelis and wounded more than three thy three hundred.
Speaker 1: So thirty three, thirteen and thirty three. Again, these aren't
Speaker 1: free Masonic numbers. These there are kabbal Lah numbers, Kabalistic
Speaker 1: numbers significant to Freemasons because the Masonic order is founded
Speaker 1: pond the magic of the Kabbalah and infested frankest Illuminati.
Speaker 1: Both initiates have no idea of the symbolic meaning of
Speaker 1: their own ceremonies and rituals. These numbers are magical and
Speaker 1: are used in the portion of the public ritual that
Speaker 1: is seen. It was awful thoughtful of Hamas to kill
Speaker 1: and wound the amounts needed to fulfill this number scheme. Obviously,
Speaker 1: these aren't accurate. These aren't accurate accounts, but rather a
Speaker 1: cryptic manner of no passing among among one another and
Speaker 1: their superiors. It's proclaimed by Zionists, both Christians and Jewish,
Speaker 1: that the Third Temple, by my account second or not
Speaker 1: at all, or first, must be built. They say, with
Speaker 1: emphasis on this locale that doesn't belong to either Jews
Speaker 1: or Christians. When you see the term Holy of Holies,
Speaker 1: they don't mean your butt only. Alisha Crawley would have
Speaker 1: said that the Temple mountain area is where this Holy
Speaker 1: of Holies is located. This war going on in Israel
Speaker 1: makes for the perfect opportunity and the perfect smoke screen
Speaker 1: under which to destroy or capture this holy land and
Speaker 1: demolish the Muslim structure while preparing the building of their
Speaker 1: prophetic temple. They need to destroy Haram al Sharif, the dome.
Speaker 1: And that's and that isn't all. Jews are allowed to
Speaker 1: visit the site, but not to pray there. Now, this
Speaker 1: is where a whole bunch of bad shit goes on,
Speaker 1: and they do it anyway, and they they have their
Speaker 1: own freaking you know, military idea of people fucking with
Speaker 1: people all the time. Jews are allowed to visit the site,
Speaker 1: but not to pray there. Jews have exclusive rights to
Speaker 1: the Western Wall for their worship, the Whaling Wall. It's
Speaker 1: what everybody you see, everybody touching it right in their head,
Speaker 1: bob that shit. Yeah, when you see Trump and other
Speaker 1: US politicians or other politicians around the world wearing a
Speaker 1: yamaka kip it a small hat if you will, touching
Speaker 1: a wall and genuflecting or frustrating with their hand on
Speaker 1: their wall, it's likely this Western Wall where the photo
Speaker 1: was taken. They're not allowed to enter certain areas according
Speaker 1: to their own beliefs, which prohibit it, not so much
Speaker 1: by restrictions placed on them by the Islamic caretakers. According
Speaker 1: to Jewish law, for the Jews to enter it at
Speaker 1: all places, a needed aspect to any good invasion is
Speaker 1: to be able to enter all places, they must first
Speaker 1: cleanse Harem al Sharif and cleanse they do, but they
Speaker 1: make it really dirty when they cleanse things, blood feces, entrails.
Speaker 1: Written on August first, twenty twenty three, two months before
Speaker 1: the idea of Israeli Defense Force allowed for a breach
Speaker 1: at sixteen points along their own defense walls and had
Speaker 1: moved the site of an outdoor music festival much closer
Speaker 1: to said defense wall. How thoughtful of them, Iramim published
Speaker 1: a rather telling article. They warned that something was in
Speaker 1: the making, and it involved the Dome of the Rock.
Speaker 1: Research conducted by Iramim over the past year has uncovered
Speaker 1: the involvement of the Israeli government in helping to secure
Speaker 1: quote unquote redheifers for ritual sacrifice, which according to Jewish law,
Speaker 1: is required to reveal the Jewish temple on the Herm
Speaker 1: Alsherif temple mount. The project to acquire this specific type
Speaker 1: of kyle from the United States was spearheaded by the
Speaker 1: Temple Movement and an American Evangelical Christian group. Oh isn't
Speaker 1: that nice? Right, with the support of the state according
Speaker 1: to Jewish law, So this is a good one, right
Speaker 1: back and dis dispensationalism in this psychotic darby, in this
Speaker 1: lunatic fucking schoolfield and merging. Then why did that happen? Well,
Speaker 1: because the franc Is are the ones that uh founded
Speaker 1: those brethrens after they were quote unquote baptized in to Catholicism.
Speaker 1: According to the Jewish law, the sacrifice of the red
Speaker 1: heifer's young female cop would enable ritual purification necessary for
Speaker 1: mass Jewish assent to them mout and ultimately the construction
Speaker 1: of the Third Temple in place of the Dom with
Speaker 1: the Rock. The ashes of these red female cows have
Speaker 1: to be spread over the holy site before they could
Speaker 1: enter to worship. Yes, but also it was necessary and
Speaker 1: very uh and very odd stipulation to fulfill before the
Speaker 1: second or third depending on who's count you're gone by
Speaker 1: temple can be built. Another insight came from ire I
Speaker 1: mean in July twenty twenty one. On Sunday July eighteenth,
Speaker 1: which was Tisha Bob's, a Jewish holiday of morning commemorating
Speaker 1: the destruction of the Jewish temples and other Jewish tragedies
Speaker 1: over the course of history. The Digital police forcefully and
Speaker 1: indiscriminately removed Muslims from the temple Mount Harram Alshrie for
Speaker 1: fear of protests against Jewish visitors to the Holy conbound.
Speaker 1: So who really runs the place? How is it that
Speaker 1: their police are even there with jurisdiction that they have
Speaker 1: to be more moving other people, people who are residents
Speaker 1: there out of their out of fear that they're going
Speaker 1: to do something. So they're removing them out of fear.
Speaker 1: Do you really think that's it's always the victimhood, even
Speaker 1: when they're the ones doing the police brutality and the
Speaker 1: police you know, police state, you know, authoritarian bullshit. It's no,
Speaker 1: we're removing you because so that you don't trouble, Like,
Speaker 1: are you fucking kidding me? What are you doing here
Speaker 1: that we should start trouble about? Maybe don't take us
Speaker 1: off the property, Maybe we should be defending it, even
Speaker 1: though it's a fucking rock. Anyway, it doesn't matter. For
Speaker 1: fear of protests against Jewish visitors to the Holy Compound, well,
Speaker 1: what do you consider protests just saying hey, we don't
Speaker 1: agree with what you being here and holding a sign up, Well,
Speaker 1: can't have that, God forbid. That's a fucking meaningless gesture.
Speaker 1: Why who cares if they do that? Later that day Israelly.
Speaker 1: Prime Minister Neftali Bennett praised the Jerusalem Police for protecting
Speaker 1: Jewish freedom of worship on the Temple Mount, a statement
Speaker 1: that is a blatant violation of the long standing status
Speaker 1: quo whereby only Muslims are afforded worship rights while Jews
Speaker 1: have visitation rights. Again from the August first here, I
Speaker 1: mean research article the Temple Movements. It is an umbrella
Speaker 1: term for various Jewish groups who are opposed. They're talking
Speaker 1: about Temple movements who are opposed to not only exclusive
Speaker 1: prayer rights of Muslims in the holy est Blonde, but
Speaker 1: are also hostile to their very presence in the Holy place.
Speaker 1: Their goal is to overturn the status quo established by
Speaker 1: a nineteen sixty seven peace agreement with Jordan. Remember they
Speaker 1: did all the killings and also went after the liberty right.
Speaker 1: This is the result of all that malicious Israel and
Speaker 1: impose Jewish domination over the mount. This includes achieving Jewish
Speaker 1: prayer rights, establishing a temporal and or spatial division of
Speaker 1: the Holy space, and ultimately destroying the Dome of the
Speaker 1: Rock and replacing it with the Third Temple. To sell
Speaker 1: a holy war, there has to be a holy aspect
Speaker 1: and dispute. The City of London bankers are the Rothschilds
Speaker 1: are only interested in the site for what it means
Speaker 1: to Zionism, or what it means to Zionism for manipulative purposes.
Speaker 1: It goes without saying that Larry Fink CEOs that Larry Fink,
Speaker 1: CEO of World Owning Black Rock is a Zionist. Remember,
Speaker 1: Zionism crept out of the pages of the Luring Cabbala
Speaker 1: and into the minds of sabotaize Evy and Jacob Frank,
Speaker 1: who developed it into a clarified mission long before Theodore
Speaker 1: Hertzeil established it as quote unquote Zionism. The pioneers who
Speaker 1: successfully campaigned the notion and outline the strategy, duties, and
Speaker 1: objectives are required study to understand what truly fuels the
Speaker 1: passions of the Jesuits and the Illuminati. It's also important
Speaker 1: to understand its deception. That's what prompted me to take
Speaker 1: on the task of writing this book. Like I said,
Speaker 1: it's necessary to convince the radical followers of the radical
Speaker 1: followers that the Zionist's goal will lead them to their
Speaker 1: much anticipated day of judgment and redemption. The religious leaders
Speaker 1: are not at all what they appear. If they are
Speaker 1: supporting Zionist ideas, that is the hastening of God's work
Speaker 1: by man's meddling, they are in defiance of God and
Speaker 1: acting against the natural order and balance of the world. Yeah,
Speaker 1: these top religious organizations, whether they are whether they're fully
Speaker 1: aware or idealistic dupes, are in fact practicing Frankism, and
Speaker 1: mass murder is something they gladly will employ. Their whole
Speaker 1: objective is to bring us all on a high speed
Speaker 1: rail to armageddon. Some think that will bring Jesus back,
Speaker 1: the ignorant of the fact Jesus would be the first
Speaker 1: to condemn them for their wicked deeds, and others say
Speaker 1: it's to bring their Messiah them recite and to sit
Speaker 1: on the throne of the world. Any God that would
Speaker 1: be pleased over this method is no God of mine.
Speaker 1: I honestly don't think many of them believe in God
Speaker 1: at all. For at the very top of the orders.
Speaker 1: They are secular humanists and an actual recognized religion where
Speaker 1: man is God. If you ask me if I think
Speaker 1: the family the rothschild believe in any Messiah or God,
Speaker 1: the answer is a flat out no. But if they
Speaker 1: can convince a bunch of maniacs to murder everyone and
Speaker 1: each other, that makes for a pretty hands free reset.
Speaker 1: The overlords will use the Old Testament and the New
Speaker 1: Testament and the Koran as they always have to control
Speaker 1: the minds of the masses. By following it like a playbook,
Speaker 1: they will fulfill the end times quote unquote prophecy. These
Speaker 1: religious the religions are clamoring for by artificial and unnatural means,
Speaker 1: and by doing so they will be as God, but
Speaker 1: not God. There's a couple of other things in here.
Speaker 1: I saw is that worry about it? Yeah, big Iggy,
Speaker 1: let's talk about that later, Biggy Ignesius of Loyola, And
Speaker 1: let's just talk about the I N R. I. Though
Speaker 1: you see it over the top of Jesus's head, crosses
Speaker 1: a lot appears on the placard over the top of Jesus,
Speaker 1: and on some crosses we're told initial stand for Yesus
Speaker 1: uh Nazarenas Rex rex if they are, or Jesus Nas
Speaker 1: of now Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews. If
Speaker 1: we are to believe this placard carries any historical weight,
Speaker 1: we would assume it was placed there in cynical mockery
Speaker 1: of the man. The Romans and naughty Pharisees Pharisee Jews
Speaker 1: had crucified like a here is your king, you know.
Speaker 1: Here he is nailed to a piece of wood, dead like,
Speaker 1: and it's like, here he is King of the Jews.
Speaker 1: There you go, a tough guy, you know, a warning
Speaker 1: to others not to step out of line. But the
Speaker 1: Romans were reluctant, according to the story, to crucify Jesus.
Speaker 1: So this tone of dark humor seems a bit out
Speaker 1: of place. However, when you look at the Jesuits who
Speaker 1: begin who began forming in the years fifteen thirty one
Speaker 1: to thirty seven and were recognized by Pope Paul the
Speaker 1: Third in fifteen forty, with Ignatius of Loyola elected as
Speaker 1: first Superior Superior General General. Right weird because it's a
Speaker 1: it's a it's a military order, just like the Knights
Speaker 1: of Malta as first Superior. Here your general. In fifteen
Speaker 1: forty one we see another meeting for I Nra Eustam
Speaker 1: Neckar regis impious, which roughly means justice is to exterminate
Speaker 1: or annihilate heretical kings, governments, or rulers. If we are
Speaker 1: to place that meeting above the head of Jesus, the
Speaker 1: blasphemy to Christianity is all the more distinct, because why
Speaker 1: place the acronym above Jesus's head unless it was to
Speaker 1: imply he was one such heretical king that was justly
Speaker 1: dealt with. That's awfully odd for a military order named
Speaker 1: the Society of Jesus. But everything is inverted, right.
Speaker 6: Though.
Speaker 1: This is preest craftyond Babylon tho. It was just a
Speaker 1: couple little pieces out of it. Recommend it. Recommend it
Speaker 1: to your friends and family and cat here is your cat?
Speaker 1: Read Get a good book for your cat. Yeah, so,
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's worth the bother to get
Speaker 1: into this topic. Okay, didn't contact me, and I was
Speaker 1: wondering if you all right. Oh look, so this fucking faggot.
Speaker 1: This is the second one I've gotten today and I
Speaker 1: haven't even been on just step your show in a while.
Speaker 1: But this one says this is from dumb d U
Speaker 1: M f U K and the email addresses B A
Speaker 1: A L ME c U N T at gmail dot com,
Speaker 1: So obviously they're fake. It says, it's all deep state.
Speaker 1: Take your mess your sick counk deep state? What the
Speaker 1: fuck does that mean? Take your mess.
Speaker 3: Me?
Speaker 1: Yes, his name, rules words, Yes, sick cunt. Okay, now
Speaker 1: here's the other one with that will come in with them,
Speaker 1: that will come in. That's not it. These are the
Speaker 1: emails I get on my fucking business account. I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what. The other one says, I know
Speaker 1: I have it right here. No, they saved it today. Mmmm,
Speaker 1: well I didn't find it by quick apps. So let
Speaker 1: me try this. Okay, here is I'll just put it
Speaker 1: up on the screen so it's easier. Not that anybody's
Speaker 1: even watching right now, so I'll give a fuck. Can
Speaker 1: you see I can't tell if you get.
Speaker 5: It at what?
Speaker 1: It says Steve Bailey Buck Daniel's mama at gmail dot com.
Speaker 1: This isn't my business account. Go fuck yo, mama, little
Speaker 1: nazi bitch have all the people to call that on
Speaker 1: this platform on FTG media, I'm like the least fucking
Speaker 1: likely candidate, right, because it's not. First of all, national
Speaker 1: socialism and Nazi have nothing to do with each other.
Speaker 1: Nazi is a fake, made up Jewish word by fucking retards,
Speaker 1: and retards who continue to keep it moving and carry
Speaker 1: it on and have it give it life still are
Speaker 1: typically CIA and FBI and all these other fucking agencies
Speaker 1: creating groups with retarded ideologies so that they can pin
Speaker 1: and constantly keep people from looking in the past and
Speaker 1: seeing what Germany was really about, because God forbid they
Speaker 1: have we have an example of resistance to the banking
Speaker 1: elite and all these fucking faggot wayvays, because if we
Speaker 1: had that and we saw how it could work, then
Speaker 1: they would have a harder time putting us in this
Speaker 1: digital prison box because we would know what was coming next,
Speaker 1: and we would know that we had the power to
Speaker 1: do many great things even without the fucking gold. But
Speaker 1: this piece of shit loser and also a Jew made
Speaker 1: up the word Nazi and it's more like Nazi and
Speaker 1: it basically means like you're an idiot or a fucking
Speaker 1: absolute moron. So who the hell would go around saying
Speaker 1: that there are a neo moron anyone. Well, if you do,
Speaker 1: then you're exactly right. You most certainly are. I'm a
Speaker 1: go fuck yo, mama. Little nazi bitch y'all are outnumbered
Speaker 1: and outgunned, so that's a threat. And when people threaten me,
Speaker 1: I don't take it too kindly. It puts me in
Speaker 1: a fighting mood. Oh now there's people here. Here's fucker
Speaker 1: saying shut up, dummy. Who are you talking to? Oh
Speaker 1: this guy? Nell's who's this faggot? Cold? Little Nazi bitches.
Speaker 1: Y'all are outnumbered and out got so here's the asshole
Speaker 1: right here. Uh and then here he comes. I why
Speaker 1: why all of a sudden am I getting this?
Speaker 5: Uh?
Speaker 1: All this lovely attention? You little faggot? Yeps? Hey, look
Speaker 1: at that. I can just do that and then bye bye.
Speaker 3: What do you know?
Speaker 1: That was easy enough. Let's see I'll put it back
Speaker 1: if it even shows it again. Yeah, it still shows
Speaker 1: the highlighted but it's all right. Cool, Thank you fucker
Speaker 1: for you know on that. I didn't even know that
Speaker 1: was going on. Nelly is here. What a funny lady.
Speaker 1: That's a woman? Are you sure.
Speaker 12: So?
Speaker 1: I mean they used the same exact verbiage that I
Speaker 1: just used one toxic, straight white male and he's got
Speaker 1: a cool cat, or at least a picture of a
Speaker 1: cool cat. All right, So whoops, that wasn't unintentional there,
Speaker 1: all right. So we're gonna move back into so Apart
Speaker 1: from that going on, right, there's I don't know who
Speaker 1: you tell you? Do you guys tell me have you
Speaker 1: been privy to or poisoned with in your ears and
Speaker 1: your brain? Like this motherfucker. I brought up the word
Speaker 1: logos earlier, so I'm not gonna just leave it at that.
Speaker 1: You can put the fucking words together. I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: say his name. I'm gonna invoke that energy. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna give him the freaking that. I'm not gonna give
Speaker 1: him that as much either. But this motherfucker in this
Speaker 1: thing going on with Davis, whom brings a lot of
Speaker 1: negative attention to himself, the way he carries himself as well,
Speaker 1: not say anything about I listen to him. So I'm
Speaker 1: not saying anything bad in that respect. I just think
Speaker 1: that there's times where he could say things a lot less,
Speaker 1: a little bit more nobil and dignity and self respect
Speaker 1: and actually show like carry like lead by example a
Speaker 1: little bit more so that so that this message isn't
Speaker 1: confused because of people like that out there, and the
Speaker 1: masses and their media will always try to take socialism,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, take nationalism and turn it into a Nazi
Speaker 1: that you don't want to start behaving the part. You
Speaker 1: don't want to start acting the part, and give them
Speaker 1: all the fucking, you know, legitimization and validation that they
Speaker 1: need to continue to think that you're an asshole, when
Speaker 1: in reality, we're the only people that get it that
Speaker 1: we need to try to do something to preserve not
Speaker 1: only our culture in our country, but our families. And
Speaker 1: you know, it's a big deal when you have children,
Speaker 1: and that matters to people. And it sucks when you
Speaker 1: see people who actually to claim to be on the
Speaker 1: level and understand and comprehend this type of stuff still
Speaker 1: behaving like a fool because it brings negative attention to
Speaker 1: everybody else who's on the same platform with them. And
Speaker 1: it's not even so much the stupid shit like that
Speaker 1: in the chat, who cares unless they got bold, and
Speaker 1: then I'd have to fucking put holes in them. That's
Speaker 1: a different story. But the whole problem here is that.
Speaker 1: How are we carrying ourselves and are we trying to
Speaker 1: be better than the people who mock us or present
Speaker 1: themselves as you know, quote unquote representing an era in
Speaker 1: Germany that was quite nice. You are they doing justice
Speaker 1: to that memory? Do they even understand it really or
Speaker 1: do they think it's about something about something else, something
Speaker 1: about you know, some kind of militant act, some kind
Speaker 1: of aggressive action that divides you more from people rather
Speaker 1: than brings people together for a common cause, which is
Speaker 1: to get rid of this fucking parasite. Because if you're
Speaker 1: doing dividing, then you're doing the work of the ouve.
Speaker 1: And if you're not smart enough to understand that, then
Speaker 1: you shouldn't be representing yourself as being one of us,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, or just even a common
Speaker 1: decent human being, one of us being that who wants
Speaker 1: something better for their families, who doesn't want to have
Speaker 1: to think about what's going to happen when when they're
Speaker 1: not here to protect them anymore, or will they be
Speaker 1: able to protect them and keep them fed when shit
Speaker 1: does start to go down Because of all of the people,
Speaker 1: you know, prior to us, who did nothing for the
Speaker 1: last one hundred and seventy years or so, and that's
Speaker 1: kind of shitty. They have to think about seven shit
Speaker 1: that keeps you up at night. Will your children be
Speaker 1: traumatized by the life that they have to live or
Speaker 1: will they be able to grow and develop naturally without
Speaker 1: having this unnatural element harming them, changing who they are,
Speaker 1: stealing away their innocence, Because that's what makes all this matter.
Speaker 1: Like otherwise we're just fucking around here, and honestly, maybe
Speaker 1: we still are, because this is just if nothing happens,
Speaker 1: we're still just distracting ourselves. I might as well play
Speaker 1: out our videos if we're not gonna do If nothing
Speaker 1: comes of this, then it was just we wasted this
Speaker 1: much time sitting here or listening or doing whatever. And
Speaker 1: the act of hearing it isn't the same thing as
Speaker 1: acting on it, right, So what I'm doing and presenting
Speaker 1: this information these examples of the past so we can
Speaker 1: understand the present. That's all fine and good. But when
Speaker 1: things when you when you're faced with something that's coming
Speaker 1: your direction and it means you harm, what is it?
Speaker 1: What is it that we're actually doing overall? And this
Speaker 1: is Is there anything else that can that we can do?
Speaker 1: Besides swimming around in a circle, like because that feels
Speaker 1: what that feels like what we're doing, we're we're just
Speaker 1: picking a different flavor of distraction, keeping ourselves busy until
Speaker 1: they come pick us off. We're just fishing like you know,
Speaker 1: like when they say fish in a barrel, We're just
Speaker 1: swimming around in circles because there's no place else to go.
Speaker 1: They control the media, they control everything else, and they
Speaker 1: control what we think about because if they do something,
Speaker 1: we react to it. We respond to it. We show
Speaker 1: the evidence, and we show a pattern of historical Like
Speaker 1: what I do. I show a historical pattern of behavior
Speaker 1: so that you can see their their signature and their
Speaker 1: fingerprint on everything and understand when you're seeing it in
Speaker 1: a present day how to identify who and what it
Speaker 1: is and at least the nature of it so you
Speaker 1: don't get caught up in it. But at the same time,
Speaker 1: what does that do. It's helping them keep us distracted.
Speaker 1: No dent have I put in the future that's coming
Speaker 1: for us, No one has anybody else. All we've done
Speaker 1: is keep ourselves occupied or you know, and it's not
Speaker 1: trying to be infotainment, But what else is it? Because
Speaker 1: I mean, okay, well, we did really well to identify
Speaker 1: the enemy and identify what enemy behavior is, like malicious behavior,
Speaker 1: things that would harm us, things that are presented to
Speaker 1: us like good ideas, but have a whole different meaning
Speaker 1: and a purpose behind them. We've established a lot of
Speaker 1: those throughout the episodes, and other people will have done
Speaker 1: the same throughout their shows and the last twenty years
Speaker 1: or so, and books and all that, explaining things if
Speaker 1: people get had read them. If not, then I'm reading
Speaker 1: them to you. But that's great, we can identify it.
Speaker 1: So that just all that means is when they're doing
Speaker 1: something like a ritual where they need to the torture
Speaker 1: people and they need to have them fully terrified, well
Speaker 1: it helps if the person knows that they should be scared.
Speaker 1: So in essence for us bringing this to light, and
Speaker 1: this is why I think they do just disclosure all
Speaker 1: the time too. Now, not only do they want you
Speaker 1: to do nothing, so that's like your tacit agreement and
Speaker 1: your consent to it when you do nothing after they
Speaker 1: tell you what they're going to do, and that's always
Speaker 1: part of the ritual. Right to do nothing means you
Speaker 1: consent to it. Whatever right the other one is to
Speaker 1: understand just how wickedly evil it is, so that you're
Speaker 1: you're properly terrified. Most people would be properly terrified when
Speaker 1: it comes. So hooray. We all work for him, even
Speaker 1: if I'm not trying to, and it gets a little
Speaker 1: irritating when it's we know it well, you sense that
Speaker 1: this is all Even people who try really hard and
Speaker 1: do really well, and you know, we're really hard at
Speaker 1: it and write books like Michael Collins Piper, I still
Speaker 1: see errors like they're still not seeing the big picture.
Speaker 1: They're still seeing this as the United States of America
Speaker 1: and country, and I'm like, no, that's all gone, that's
Speaker 1: all gone. Why this is happening the way it is
Speaker 1: is because it's not there for us, and it's not
Speaker 1: there to protect us. It's gone. They just have slowly
Speaker 1: been creeping along showing more and more just how gone
Speaker 1: it is. And now they're attacking. And I knew this
Speaker 1: was going to happen as soon as Trump got in there.
Speaker 1: They're going He's going to obey and bring forth exactly
Speaker 1: what the Jays want, and that is to disarm us.
Speaker 1: Because once that happens, if you think it's shit's moving fast.
Speaker 1: Now you're gonna break your neck when that, if they
Speaker 1: ever get their hands on those, and if people let
Speaker 1: let them go, you're gonna see a lot and that's
Speaker 1: not gonna be pretty. Yeah, let me let me put
Speaker 1: this up here. So so anyway, this whole this whole melodrama,
Speaker 1: you know w w f WWE not World Wildlife fun,
Speaker 1: but you know World Wrestling Federation bullshit between two fucking people,
Speaker 1: one of them who's affiliated with Stu, the faggot Peters,
Speaker 1: who looks like him, He looks like a fucking mini
Speaker 1: me if him, who's a smug, little, arrogant, fucking prick
Speaker 1: who had ship to talk about me on one of
Speaker 1: his obscure nobody fucking watches Odyssey fucking videos a while back,
Speaker 1: and uh, he's actingly. I don't know if he's actually
Speaker 1: answering chat questions or not, but I think somebody brought
Speaker 1: up me and he's like, he's like, yeah, I was
Speaker 1: on her and he's like he didn't have his facts right,
Speaker 1: not that I have to qualify for this fucking little torp.
Speaker 1: All right, I shall. So he says, well, he's he's
Speaker 1: making excuse. He said, well, first he said he doesn't
Speaker 1: agree with uh, some of the some of the stuff
Speaker 1: in mind comf Well, yeah, I don't because I'm gonna
Speaker 1: work out anyway, So I don't need a fucking government
Speaker 1: to tell me what to work out. Was what my
Speaker 1: point was. And I said, if anybody did, I tell him,
Speaker 1: go fuck themselves, because I'm I'm a fucking my own person.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna do it for me because that's what I do.
Speaker 1: Four miles a day on the elliptical and I lift
Speaker 1: weights every fucking day. But nobody's gonna tell me to
Speaker 1: do it, because I'm gonnaell him the fuck off, plain
Speaker 1: and simple. I'm a fucking Italian and I have a
Speaker 1: fucking pride in myself, in my in my own personal space.
Speaker 1: Don't be fucking getting into it and telling me what
Speaker 1: to do. I have an authority problem, and it's because
Speaker 1: there's a lot of people who tell you to do
Speaker 1: things who are fucking retarded. And I think I think
Speaker 1: Davis brought that up too, and it sounded really good,
Speaker 1: and he said that you know, a lot of us
Speaker 1: are in this movement because or have this mindset, because
Speaker 1: we have a problem with authority. So that was the
Speaker 1: first thing he said. And the second thing he said
Speaker 1: to me, and this is this is a while back,
Speaker 1: he said. Also, he's making excuses because apparently, and this
Speaker 1: is where he signed his fucking to tag. He signed
Speaker 1: his own totag because seriously, if I and I challenged him,
Speaker 1: I told him right out, if you and I are
Speaker 1: or ever within a fist throws distance from one another,
Speaker 1: expected to happen, And I said, I will. I won't
Speaker 1: surprise you with it. I will fucking box you, and
Speaker 1: I'll give you an under pair of gloves. I'll fucking
Speaker 1: provide it. But it's happening, and you're not gonna puss
Speaker 1: you out on it because you can't run your mouth
Speaker 1: like that and expect no consequences. Well, he said, and
Speaker 1: he did it incorrectly. He insulted Rebecca, who he doesn't
Speaker 1: know anything about, because he misunderstood because he half pays
Speaker 1: attention because he's too fucking self absorbed in his own
Speaker 1: bullshit to actually even paid attention to other people. But
Speaker 1: then he has opinions about people that are so fucking valid. Right, No,
Speaker 1: he said, she's basically called her a mutt or something
Speaker 1: like that, like a mixed orright, and that I was
Speaker 1: making excuses for having a You're not even like saying
Speaker 1: this because he's talking about my daughter having a biracial
Speaker 1: daughter or something like that. Right, he was written correct.
Speaker 1: Rebecca's father is a six foot six fucking German Man
Speaker 1: named the last name is Schneider. Okay, so he fuck you, Zach. Secondly, Secondly,
Speaker 1: her mother is German and Lithuanian, and just so happens
Speaker 1: to be a little bit Brazilian and they lived in Brazil.
Speaker 1: Who the fuck cares? And besides, I wasn't fucking asking
Speaker 1: you to validate my existence or to qualify anything. So
Speaker 1: my daughter, I'm German, Irish and Italian, and I have
Speaker 1: a little Lithuanian in me too. And I'm not talking
Speaker 1: about the Lithuanian Jew either. I'm talking about the Lithuanians
Speaker 1: who were fucking killed by them, by the fucking Soviets.
Speaker 1: Piece of shit, you fucking fag. So now he's starting
Speaker 1: up with Davis and I. But here's the thing. I
Speaker 1: think it's fucking contrived. I know he has an attitude problem,
Speaker 1: I know he's way too smug for his own fucking good,
Speaker 1: but it almost sounds like it's like WWF over there,
Speaker 1: it's like he calls him out on like Twitter or something. Well,
Speaker 1: here's the thing now that he's affiliated with STU, and
Speaker 1: here's the thing that you know about. You have to
Speaker 1: know about this if you're ever or done any type
Speaker 1: of like attempt to make something in the public, right,
Speaker 1: is that nobody will talk about you or say your name.
Speaker 1: Not even doctor Artist was on my show forty fucking times.
Speaker 1: He never once mentioned me to fucking anybody. He would
Speaker 1: tell me on my show that somebody came up to
Speaker 1: him at one of his events and said that he
Speaker 1: watches that they watched my show. But he said it
Speaker 1: on my show, so it still contains it to just
Speaker 1: anybody who's watching the show. He doesn't ever say my
Speaker 1: name anywhere. He didn't because these fucking people are gatekeepers
Speaker 1: and though the entire system, the media, everything they make
Speaker 1: and create, they make conflict. They create fake scenarios when
Speaker 1: they're trying to, you know, make something popular. Like the
Speaker 1: mainstream media would never have said QAnon if they didn't
Speaker 1: want anybody to know about it. The fact that they
Speaker 1: did means it was part of their fucking plan to
Speaker 1: have people look for it and pay attention to it.
Speaker 1: If they didn't want you to know about bath salts.
Speaker 1: That wouldn't have been on the fucking news if they
Speaker 1: didn't want you to know about this, or that they
Speaker 1: won't discuss it because they have it's the lie by
Speaker 1: omission that they have the power to do. And if
Speaker 1: they don't want anybody to know about you, they never
Speaker 1: mentioned you. So why would a guy who's now affiliated
Speaker 1: with Stu Peters be mentioning Davis and the show in
Speaker 1: great detail unless he has enough you know, people's eyes
Speaker 1: on him now because of this really weird fucking thing
Speaker 1: that happened with him. Is like, how the hell did
Speaker 1: that happen? It's fucking nobody, piece of shit, asshole do
Speaker 1: he's on there? Who cares? But the point is now
Speaker 1: he's affiliated with them, and now he's talking about Davis.
Speaker 1: It's almost as if he's trying to bring him up.
Speaker 1: My my feeling on this is that more people are
Speaker 1: gonna look at both of them because of this little
Speaker 1: soap opera that they're doing, and they're both going to
Speaker 1: raise it. They're fucking you know, public public status up
Speaker 1: as far as popularity is concerned, all at the expense
Speaker 1: of the people that are watching it. That think it's real.
Speaker 1: So that's that's one of the reasons why I have
Speaker 1: a problem with what's going on over there too. I'm
Speaker 1: willing to listen to Davis and you know, but I
Speaker 1: don't think anybody would be honest about that if they
Speaker 1: were involved in that. I know, desperate times called for
Speaker 1: desperate ways of you know, making something happened with their
Speaker 1: financial issues and stuff like that. And you know, trust me,
Speaker 1: I've seen nothing. But maybe maybe there's a sixty percent
Speaker 1: decrease since it was a lot since I had the store.
Speaker 1: A couple of those couple of those years were really
Speaker 1: bad after twenty twenty, you can't. It's hard to go
Speaker 1: from grossing three bring around three hundred K to one
Speaker 1: eighty six and then still have to pay out sixty
Speaker 1: of that too employees and insurances and shit like that.
Speaker 1: And that's not even talking about your overhead and your
Speaker 1: material costs and your gas to get back and forth
Speaker 1: to San Diego and all that. So yeah, I get it,
Speaker 1: but it's also being honest to be sincere and do
Speaker 1: not do not distract when there's like this whole fucking
Speaker 1: kilgrid is coming around on top of us. We don't
Speaker 1: need to be talking or thinking about fucking little twerp asshole,
Speaker 1: narrow shouldered pricks who like to run their mouth. We
Speaker 1: don't need to bring about bring them up, and we
Speaker 1: don't need to. We don't need to dwell upon what
Speaker 1: they do and say unless it's part of the game
Speaker 1: more distractions. Pick your flavor, which everyone seems more most
Speaker 1: real to you and most valid. Rebel Johnny Uh, let
Speaker 1: me read what you said there. I'm trying to understand
Speaker 1: what that means. I'm not like challenging you or anything.
Speaker 1: I'm just curious about if I'm reading it right. Says
Speaker 1: we know one hundred times what the Germans? Are you saying?
Speaker 1: Like I'm doing it too, because I didn't really get
Speaker 1: too deep into that what the Germans did when they
Speaker 1: were attacked by the J's. When the dollar dies and
Speaker 1: somebody says something about it, in six months, they're taking
Speaker 1: the dollar away? Is that a real thing? I was
Speaker 1: trying to listen to what the hell of Richie that
Speaker 1: from Boston was trying to say about that. I don't
Speaker 1: really like listening to him sometimes because he puts this
Speaker 1: whole spin like I'd rather listen to Jail Break Overlander,
Speaker 1: where he's not getting into some kind of you know,
Speaker 1: spinning everything into a religious thing, because it's just another cast.
Speaker 1: He just picked a different cult. And I think at
Speaker 1: some point we have to all just reject the entire
Speaker 1: fucking the whole system, like no, I reject this entired,
Speaker 1: fucking concept, like none of it. You can't, could you,
Speaker 1: Because any way of not rejecting that full, full fully
Speaker 1: and wholeheartedly is a preservation of part of it. It's like, no,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tear the whole fucking thing down and start
Speaker 1: over with rational minds. If if money is a thing,
Speaker 1: fucking destroy it. I'm not saying I'm not talking about
Speaker 1: the digital thing. I'm just saying the power of that
Speaker 1: that they hold over it took it, take it and
Speaker 1: pull the rug rade out from underneath them like they
Speaker 1: did in Germany.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: And by the way, everybody, of course, obviously all support helps.
Speaker 1: This one is for the FGJ walla, that one's for
Speaker 1: the ball busterers, gifts and go. I'm gonna get back
Speaker 1: into the reading here in just a moment. So this
Speaker 1: little dollar sands on top. Those do help, and I
Speaker 1: do appreciate it. And if I'm you know, I just
Speaker 1: get inundated by enough nonsense as it is to have
Speaker 1: it be part of what we're trying to do here.
Speaker 1: And I think we're supposed to be better than that.
Speaker 1: And it's like the whole what's the first rule? Is
Speaker 1: no infighting?
Speaker 12: Right?
Speaker 3: And what is it?
Speaker 1: What does this become when little cocky, little prick who's
Speaker 1: had said shit about me, he doesn't have any no,
Speaker 1: it doesn't have a noble or a good character about
Speaker 1: him at all, but it's so pompous that he thinks
Speaker 1: he's better than everybody. I don't know if he's a
Speaker 1: spoiled little rich kid or what his problem is, or
Speaker 1: if he's LDS like latter day Saint or some sort
Speaker 1: of fucking you know, Jehovah witness where he's so fucking
Speaker 1: isolated that he thinks he can judge everyone else in
Speaker 1: the world. I don't know what his problem is, but
Speaker 1: he has a problem and it needs to be corrected.
Speaker 1: And the old way of correcting things was you talk
Speaker 1: shit like that to another man. A man puts you
Speaker 1: on your ass. And if a man puts you on
Speaker 1: your ass, or or if they want to, you don't start.
Speaker 1: You don't start or crying about it, because what then
Speaker 1: you started criticizing me for if oh, you're just a mania,
Speaker 1: if you're a psychotic, I'm like, dude, don't run your mouth.
Speaker 1: Consequences right, there are consequences for doing that, And if
Speaker 1: you're going to continue to do that, if you're going
Speaker 1: to continue to run your mouth, then yes, that's exactly
Speaker 1: going to be the outcome. You've already and you've already
Speaker 1: done it. You've already made your statement, You've already you've
Speaker 1: already insulted my daughter even though you're completely one hundred
Speaker 1: percent wrong about it, and you're just a fucking little idiot.
Speaker 1: It's too late, it's too late. You've already done what
Speaker 1: you need. You're you already earned a fucking ass kicking.
Speaker 1: So that's what you're gonna get if I have, if
Speaker 1: I've ever that close to you, which probably won't happen,
Speaker 1: but if it does, if it's ever an FTJ meeting,
Speaker 1: then guess what it's going to become? A boxing match?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I'm just saying they will just now wrote
Speaker 1: they won't. I'm just saying that they will not just
Speaker 1: roll over on a large portion of the population because
Speaker 1: we are aware of what they do and have done.
Speaker 9: Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, my hope, my hope concerned is what is it
Speaker 1: that we're gonna do U? And why are we waiting
Speaker 1: for them to make the first move because when they
Speaker 1: when they are ready, it's gonna be way too late
Speaker 1: for us because there's no illness, surprise, there's no fighting
Speaker 1: their technology and their drones and also the shit they're
Speaker 1: not gonna they don't ever do anything that what we
Speaker 1: call it'll be always honest. Yeah, and it's so always
Speaker 1: honest when you listening yesterday because I turned it off.
Speaker 1: I turned it always honest if you were if you
Speaker 1: were listening to Davis yesterday, like I got in, I
Speaker 1: think just before he went into a double intro, so
Speaker 1: he doubled down on the stuff that is my least
Speaker 1: favorite part of his show, which is one thing you
Speaker 1: just Zach's opinion is fucking meaningless and I don't care
Speaker 1: about it, but that is kind of a little bit
Speaker 1: hard to listen to because it's like, are you fucking
Speaker 1: the non Jewish Howard Stern, Like why are we listening
Speaker 1: to this shit? And then he says, well, my point is,
Speaker 1: I think he said, my point is that this isn't
Speaker 1: like pornography. This is this the type of shit that
Speaker 1: they put out to poison us with on a daily basis, Like, well,
Speaker 1: then why are you taking that poison and poisoning.
Speaker 7: Us with it?
Speaker 1: Like that's that was my retort to that, Like in
Speaker 1: my head, I was thinking, you know, I get what
Speaker 1: your point is, but it's it's kind of a it's
Speaker 1: kind of a weak point.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 1: But anyway, so after you did that, he got into
Speaker 1: this E. Michael Jones thing, and then that even that
Speaker 1: confirmed it and solidified it even more, Like why are
Speaker 1: these fucking people who have been established in there a
Speaker 1: long time and probably aren't real that that real either
Speaker 1: who put out information because it sounds good and it
Speaker 1: seems right, but also have probably black and poison pills
Speaker 1: in it themselves and aren't exactly who they appear to be.
Speaker 1: Why are they talking about of all people, like there's
Speaker 1: a lot of people out there. Why did he mention
Speaker 1: logos revealed in Zach who goes by the name of
Speaker 1: and when he was when he was playing this like fake?
Speaker 1: I call it fake because I think it was contrived E.
Speaker 1: Michael Jones thing. I'm not saying that. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: that Davis like concocted this thing. I'm saying that they
Speaker 1: were having a fake conversation, like bringing this up just
Speaker 1: to be recorded so that they could talk about it,
Speaker 1: and it sounded really retarded, and I'm like, this is
Speaker 1: fucking w w F shit. It's like, now everybody's gonna
Speaker 1: be talking about this guy and he's gonna make They're
Speaker 1: gonna say it in a negative way. And people are like, well,
Speaker 1: if they want, if they liked him, then it's no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna read to you tonight that the very way
Speaker 1: that they promote and bring things into popular opinion and
Speaker 1: popular you know, you know, popular names brought into your
Speaker 1: your lexicon, is through this method. It's you know, William F.
Speaker 1: Buckley National Review or whatever the hell was called he
Speaker 1: criticized John Birch Society. Nobody would even known about John's
Speaker 1: Birch Society back then if it wasn't for WIMF. Buckley
Speaker 1: constantly bringing them up. And that's what brought people to
Speaker 1: to Dohn Birch Society. So it wasn't that he was
Speaker 1: against him. It was just an offhand way that people
Speaker 1: who are not treacherous minded don't understand how this works.
Speaker 1: They don't understand how to contemplate layers of things, and
Speaker 1: they think, well, bad, that negative. They don't like this guy,
Speaker 1: and they don't. No, you wouldn't say anything about them
Speaker 1: at all if you wanted them to live, to live
Speaker 1: in obscurity and not be known by the public. The
Speaker 1: fact that you're a public figure with a platform and
Speaker 1: an audience and you bring up a name, you're trying
Speaker 1: to get them to, you know, to get more attention
Speaker 1: to them. So it was a little odd that Zach
Speaker 1: was Paul was talked about by those guys of all people,
Speaker 1: and and Zack of all people, being the bun being
Speaker 1: talked about. It's just it didn't sound right. It didn't
Speaker 1: seem right. It doesn't seem like it was natural. It
Speaker 1: seems like it's they, you know, stew latched onto him
Speaker 1: and now he's being brought through the the initiation process. Now,
Speaker 1: that's why. That's what it looks like to me. And
Speaker 1: and I don't know if Davis was commenting on that
Speaker 1: or not, because I after, after I saw that and
Speaker 1: I was listening to that, I just had enough and
Speaker 1: I said, all right out, I shouldn't have said anything.
Speaker 1: I should just kept to myself and walk and went out.
Speaker 1: But I was just like, so, so I basically said,
Speaker 1: so are we gonna continue to dwell on this? I'm
Speaker 1: gonna I mean, it's that, that was what I said.
Speaker 1: And it's like, so you're saying you're gonna continue, You're
Speaker 1: gonna do this like every episode now, So that's when
Speaker 1: I was like, I'm out of here. All right. Well, anyhow,
Speaker 1: thank you to Always Honest and to where it says
Speaker 1: thank you from Dan Crisis. I'm not sure why he
Speaker 1: doesn't tell me who that person was as Chad goes
Speaker 1: really slow though, too, so it doesn't pop up very fast.
Speaker 1: All right, I'm going to move out the screen and
Speaker 1: go to the book. Now, I'm going to have to
Speaker 1: kind of get into this section here. Maybe I should
Speaker 1: just jump right into it, but we kind of have
Speaker 1: to establish this whole thing, and I'm going to I'm
Speaker 1: going to ask you this question, do you believe this?
Speaker 1: All right? So I'm going to read this to you.
Speaker 1: But my question, I'm not saying that I believe this,
Speaker 1: even if I say it with conviction. It's just because
Speaker 1: that's how I read this. Is chapter twelve, the struggle
Speaker 1: between Stalin Area Soviet communism and Zionism. So they're making
Speaker 1: a distinction that I don't know if exists or not,
Speaker 1: a little understood political phenomenon which contributes to our understanding
Speaker 1: of the enemies within as they exist today. So I'm
Speaker 1: reading this and I want, I seriously want your opinion,
Speaker 1: and I'll go around to the all the the chats
Speaker 1: after I get, you know, to a certain point, and
Speaker 1: I'll see if anyone says anything about this. I don't
Speaker 1: know if this is true. In some respects, it makes sense.
Speaker 1: In other respects, it almost seems like they're making a
Speaker 1: case for it's not all of them, right, And I
Speaker 1: think the emphasis that's not put here is that regardless
Speaker 1: if it's Stalinist communism or Trotsky communism, the big fucking
Speaker 1: point here is that communism communism is a Jewish thing,
Speaker 1: or it's an Edenite thing, if you really want to
Speaker 1: get down to it, it's a saturn cult thing. It
Speaker 1: predates when before they even call themselves Jews, and that's
Speaker 1: how they've been living through the Cahals and their Sanhedron forever,
Speaker 1: and they insistent and demand other people to live that
Speaker 1: way too, and of course they will be the authorities
Speaker 1: and the supremacy of the of that you know, that
Speaker 1: world or that territory, because they're they're of course better
Speaker 1: than everybody else and they should lead. Rolling my eyes
Speaker 1: at that, So in that communism itself is detrimental to mankind,
Speaker 1: regardless of whatever other adjective that you add to it. Right,
Speaker 1: Stalinist communism or Trotskyite communism, it's communism is not only
Speaker 1: just an ouve thing and a Jesuit thing, because that's
Speaker 1: what they are too, is a bunch of oy vays.
Speaker 1: But also it's not like one is better than the other,
Speaker 1: and if they're at odds with each other. He even
Speaker 1: makes a mention later that they've come together in more
Speaker 1: recent years. So it's like, well then, what the you
Speaker 1: know what I mean? But okay, here he goes the
Speaker 1: twin forces of Bolshevism and Zionism as if they're two
Speaker 1: different things, and I don't think they are. Have often
Speaker 1: collaborated on many fronts throughout the twentieth century. I don't
Speaker 1: think there's a distinction there. I think it's the exact
Speaker 1: same thing, Bolsheviks Jews. I mean, what are we looking
Speaker 1: at with Jacob Schiff, Like, what are we looking at
Speaker 1: with who funded these people and who trained them here
Speaker 1: and what Trotsky was in Manhattan at one point, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's like, what are we talking about here? Bolshevism and Zionism.
Speaker 1: How about we just call it the same thing have
Speaker 1: often collaborated on many fronts throughout the twentieth century, both
Speaker 1: alien forces having evolved in the closing years of the
Speaker 1: nineteenth century. However, there have been conflicts between the two
Speaker 1: philosophies that remain little understood even by many who have
Speaker 1: devoted much study to both forces. Now this is where
Speaker 1: I wonder if this is really a thing or not.
Speaker 1: While there are many who view Bolshevism and Zionism as
Speaker 1: two heads of the single snake, and the two headed
Speaker 1: snake does in fact exist as biologists have reported, the
Speaker 1: realities of twentieth century geopolitical struggle suggest that there is
Speaker 1: much more to the story. In fact, there were sharp
Speaker 1: differences between the Russian nationalists led by so Russia. So
Speaker 1: here's a no again. This says, no, you can't call
Speaker 1: somebody a nationalist who murders many actual Russian ethnic people.
Speaker 1: You can't call them, can't call him. And if he
Speaker 1: wasn't a lover of his people. He didn't stand by
Speaker 1: and want much best for Russians. You can't. You can't
Speaker 1: call Stalin, of all fucking people, excuse my language, a nationalist.
Speaker 1: You think he had a heart. If you're if you're captured,
Speaker 1: you were murdered. I'm talking about if his people were captured.
Speaker 1: Once they were released, they sent back to him, he
Speaker 1: murdered them. He murdered them. Not to mention starving people
Speaker 1: at death, Not to mention all the other horrible crimes
Speaker 1: that he did to his own people. His own people,
Speaker 1: I say, because he was in control of Russia, the territory,
Speaker 1: not because they were his people by any means. He
Speaker 1: was a freaking Bolshevik. Those people don't have friends. And
Speaker 1: Jewish internationalists led by Staun's arch enemy, Leon Trotsky, i'd see.
Speaker 1: I don't see that as being an arch enemy either.
Speaker 1: I just see that as those two people, knowing Farewell
Speaker 1: would if but jays do. Stalin didn't let let them
Speaker 1: even live by the borders because he knew that they
Speaker 1: would if they if they had to, they would turn
Speaker 1: and they would help the quote unquote enemy army to
Speaker 1: save their own assets, because that's how they rolled their
Speaker 1: treacherous little fucks, so he didn't want them at the borders.
Speaker 1: And also so somebody like Leon, you know, if there's
Speaker 1: a power struggle, obviously he doesn't want that son of
Speaker 1: the bitch coming back with forces, so he killed him.
Speaker 1: That was more of a power thing than it was
Speaker 1: an ideology thing. So by the time of the Cold War,
Speaker 1: following the establishment of the Zionist state of Israel in
Speaker 1: nineteen forty eight, many traditional Trotskyites began trans morgification process, evolving,
Speaker 1: particularly in the United States, into the leading and to
Speaker 1: the leaders of an anti Stalinist element that emerges as
Speaker 1: the hardline pro Israel block that came to be known
Speaker 1: as today's neo conservatives. Well, okay, this is where you get.
Speaker 1: You know, Christian Zionism gets mixed up in that because
Speaker 1: you know, conservative blah blah blah. But are we calling
Speaker 1: them Trotskyites to try to separate and make this more confusing.
Speaker 1: These are just away vays doing wayve as shit. They
Speaker 1: are on both sides of every issue all the time,
Speaker 1: and whatever one wins, they all collect on that side.
Speaker 1: It's it doesn't mean that there was some kind of
Speaker 1: fission or schism between two ideologies of Bollshvism, and if
Speaker 1: there was, it wasn't necessary, is the whole point. They
Speaker 1: still got with everything that they wanted, They got there,
Speaker 1: got They already had our country over. We were done,
Speaker 1: we were toast. We were fighting wars for them, two
Speaker 1: fucking world wars already and establishing another banker paradigm in Israel. Right,
Speaker 1: that's what you know. Lizards like the sand. This is,
Speaker 1: of course, a cursory overview will be complicated and often
Speaker 1: confusing international struggle between the revolutionary elements, both of which
Speaker 1: have been hostile to American interests. Right, neither way, either way,
Speaker 1: they're not good people that we should be worrying about
Speaker 1: what the happened to one or the other. A detailed
Speaker 1: history of this struggle would go far beyond the purview
Speaker 1: of this volume. However, the factory remains that the modern
Speaker 1: day disciples of Trotskyism are key figures among the enemy
Speaker 1: within twisting old fashioned conservatism into a divisive and destructive
Speaker 1: force that is utilizing America's military might, the blood of
Speaker 1: its children, and its national treasure to enforce a global
Speaker 1: Zionist imperium, in short, a new world order. Okay, so
Speaker 1: the only reason why I lend credence to this, and
Speaker 1: it's not because of Stalin, but it's because of what
Speaker 1: happened after him like this. This would make more sense
Speaker 1: if Putin is actually an independent person who actually does
Speaker 1: care about the Russian people, which I honestly think that
Speaker 1: he does, and I think he's actually a lot of
Speaker 1: things about Bolsheviks in the past, especially that being like
Speaker 1: eighty eight to ninety whatever percent all Jews or Frankists,
Speaker 1: I mean, or Jews or Freemason's what I was trying
Speaker 1: to say. I have a singing retard in the back,
Speaker 1: a teenager. So if you hear that, that's who that is.
Speaker 1: He's I wish he never took drama class. He's like,
Speaker 1: ever since his voice changed, he's in love with the
Speaker 1: sound of his voice. It's ridiculous and it is awful, scratchy,
Speaker 1: it's freaky. He's trying to sing all the time. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: It's funny. Anyway, that's the madhouse that I live in. However,
Speaker 1: the factor, man, is that Okay, we already said all that,
Speaker 1: but I don't see. Here's the thing. Is this a
Speaker 1: way of describing a different type of deception that's happening.
Speaker 1: Where is this actually something that's legitimate, because yes, a
Speaker 1: bunch of if we live in this country that's been
Speaker 1: destroyed and it's been conquered, then this will be a
Speaker 1: way of explaining how it was infiltrated when reality it
Speaker 1: was already taken over, you know it. It was a
Speaker 1: fighter sale at that time at that point, because we
Speaker 1: had a bankruptcy all this other stuff, the nineteen thirteen
Speaker 1: the bank if a Reserve Act, and plus also we
Speaker 1: had a war dividing conquer strategy, civil war, and then
Speaker 1: over time, in a short period of time, if you
Speaker 1: look at the grand scale of things, things developed pretty
Speaker 1: awful and quickly through the industrial second Industrial Revolution, and
Speaker 1: what happened to terraforming people and pulling them off the
Speaker 1: land and stealing their farms and all kinds of stuff,
Speaker 1: to making scarcity and a once proud and strong country.
Speaker 1: I mean, the turning started happening right there. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter if we were good at producing stuff for a
Speaker 1: little while there. It's just it's the fact that everything
Speaker 1: changed into an artificial type of living, and we forgot
Speaker 1: and lost traits and skills along the way. A lot
Speaker 1: of us did. Full bloodlines did if they weren't all
Speaker 1: murdered off in the next in the upcoming wars that
Speaker 1: were about to happen. And you have the incorporation, which
Speaker 1: is basically their way of showing you that we were
Speaker 1: no longer a country anymore. It's not that both existed,
Speaker 1: it's simultaneously in parallel with one another. It's that one
Speaker 1: of them no longer was valid as a country because
Speaker 1: it was done. It was taken over and it incorporated
Speaker 1: and working as if we still had a you know,
Speaker 1: here's the hands. Let's pretend that these politicians are actually
Speaker 1: move and shake things, and we're not just telling them
Speaker 1: what to say in certain times and letting them have
Speaker 1: little you know, epic drama battles on TV and whatever
Speaker 1: that proceeded afterward. It's it's all been a lie. And
Speaker 1: I think that's why they need to explain it away
Speaker 1: with this idea that the Trotskyites came into neo conservatism,
Speaker 1: and it's like, no, this was just their way of
Speaker 1: slowly introducing and terrorforming and changing the moral fabric of
Speaker 1: and and you know, social engineering people to accept less
Speaker 1: and less freedoms and to expect corruption and what they
Speaker 1: call corruption, which is really just a different type of
Speaker 1: leadership because it's not the country that they thought they had.
Speaker 1: And go right back to the whole thing that they
Speaker 1: just said in the most retarded way, in the retarded
Speaker 1: fashion possible, that short barrel rifles were not part of
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment SBRs. So that could be pistol call
Speaker 1: over carbine, or it could be you know whatever, anything
Speaker 1: of the short barrels that they're saying. So, no, you're right,
Speaker 1: they didn't. They didn't mention something that didn't uh, that
Speaker 1: didn't exist back then. But what they did say is
Speaker 1: that shall not be infringed. And they did say, you know,
Speaker 1: so there's no limitations. There's limitations given. If we wanted
Speaker 1: goddamn tanking, we could afford one, we should be able
Speaker 1: to have one. If we want lander air missiles and
Speaker 1: we can afford them, we should be able to have them.
Speaker 1: Because the person that we're trying to defend from is
Speaker 1: usually those governments to have all those toys, as is
Speaker 1: the case now, and they want to take more and
Speaker 1: more from us. That's the act of a coward, the
Speaker 1: act of a little weasel, and that's the act of annoive.
Speaker 1: So at the time of Stalin's death in nineteen fifty three,
Speaker 1: the circumstances of which suggest that he was certainly helped
Speaker 1: to his death. The Soviet leader was becoming openly and
Speaker 1: actively hostile to political Zionism. Well, they kissed his ass
Speaker 1: and carried his ass and all of their effort and
Speaker 1: money from this country, the bankers. Who do you think,
Speaker 1: who was he actually opposing? If he was opposing the
Speaker 1: quote unquote Zionism is Here's the thing that might co
Speaker 1: Collins Piper doesn't take into consideration, is that the very
Speaker 1: thing that made a Stalin into a Stalin was these banks.
Speaker 1: It was these lost child type entities in the world,
Speaker 1: the Oppenheimer type, you know, Oppenheim type of entities, the
Speaker 1: kun Lobin company type entities in this world. That cult
Speaker 1: of money is what made the Bolshevik revolution possible in
Speaker 1: the first place. So it would be pretty bold and
Speaker 1: stupid to then turn your back on them and say
Speaker 1: fuck you. Because he wasn't saying fuck you to America.
Speaker 1: He was saying if this is reality he thought he was,
Speaker 1: even though he was carried throughout the entire thing, and
Speaker 1: he had apparently a nervous breakdown during the German You
Speaker 1: know advance on Russia that he actually had a nervous breakdown,
Speaker 1: curled up in a fetal position, while Avril Harriman of
Speaker 1: all people, right ran the show in Russia for a
Speaker 1: period of time. So it sounds like he's quite dependent
Speaker 1: on other things in order to make himself anything, and
Speaker 1: that communism was never meant to be an actual system,
Speaker 1: but a way of destroying systems. It's a wrecking ball.
Speaker 1: It's not an actual it's not an actual system. It's
Speaker 1: a wrecking ball. And that's another reason why they can
Speaker 1: never maintain an empire once they've destroyed it from within
Speaker 1: through erosion, is because everything that they do it's like parasitic,
Speaker 1: it's killing the host, and they can't maintain something without
Speaker 1: a life force to suck off of, right. So that's
Speaker 1: I just have a hard time believing that any of
Speaker 1: this would like much of an idiot would you have
Speaker 1: to be to like, you know, finger give the finger
Speaker 1: to the same the very thing that made it possible
Speaker 1: for that person to be what he was and to
Speaker 1: be carried through to through a war, well Russia, through
Speaker 1: you know, a war. It's doesn't make a lot of sense.
Speaker 1: They would have been starving to death in the winters.
Speaker 1: They would have been un they would have been destroyed
Speaker 1: by Germany. That's also really weird. How that insanely what
Speaker 1: do you call it? A season unseasonal cold hit Russia
Speaker 1: right at the perfect time to stall and stop and
Speaker 1: turn back the German advance that would have been That
Speaker 1: would have been it. So what kind of weird jew
Speaker 1: engineering did were they able to do back then? At
Speaker 1: the time Stalin's death, we always said that according to you, okay,
Speaker 1: the circumstances of which suggests the leader was becoming openly
Speaker 1: actively hostile to the political Zionism. According to the July
Speaker 1: twenty seventh, nineteen sixty seven report published in the American Examiner,
Speaker 1: the Jewish Telegraph Agency reported that Joseph Stalin died fourteen
Speaker 1: years ago of a rage caused when the politic Bureau
Speaker 1: opposed his proposal that all Russia Jews be expelled to Siberia.
Speaker 1: The Detroit News has reported from Washington. The story alleged
Speaker 1: that Stalin called a secret Politiburo meeting to announce a
Speaker 1: campaign against the Jews. So this is all hearsay so far.
Speaker 1: He said measures should be taken to deport Jews enmass
Speaker 1: to biro Bejon by Jan Burobaijan in Siberia. Lazara Kaganovic,
Speaker 1: the only Jewish member of the Polibero and Stalin's brother
Speaker 1: in law, tore up his party card and threw the
Speaker 1: pieces in Stalin's face, said the news. The report said
Speaker 1: that Stalin then turned purple with rage. Stalin rose from
Speaker 1: his chair, according to the account, began screaming incoherently and
Speaker 1: fell unconscious. An hour later, physicians pronounced him dead. So
Speaker 1: if you believe all that, this is the same guy
Speaker 1: that everybody was terrified there to be sent back to
Speaker 1: Russia because they were going to be murdered. They'll be
Speaker 1: put out on a train to murdered. If you want
Speaker 1: to talk about training cars of death, it wasn't the
Speaker 1: Germans and with with a you know, train full of Jews,
Speaker 1: they're going the wrong direction. Actually they're was going back
Speaker 1: to Russia post war and they were just murdering them.
Speaker 1: It's just so so somebody had the balls to do that,
Speaker 1: does that or is this just for the for the
Speaker 1: for the historical, you know, fairy tale. Although this teasingly
Speaker 1: and provocatively written news reporter aimed at like don't you
Speaker 1: think this guy would have had, like again, people that
Speaker 1: you wouldn't even see. How can you throw something in
Speaker 1: someone's face who was a leader like that? Wouldn't somebody
Speaker 1: grab your arms and snap them the fuck off before
Speaker 1: he had a chance to get that close to them? Like,
Speaker 1: where where was his quote unquote secret service type bodyguards?
Speaker 1: Nobody wanted to take a shot at the guy. You
Speaker 1: don't think he had he had people. This just seems
Speaker 1: very weird. Name that Jewish audience has never said flat
Speaker 1: out that Stalin had been murdered. The intent of the
Speaker 1: report was very clear and short, that Zionist interests in
Speaker 1: Russia had murdered the Soviet strongman because he was planning
Speaker 1: new offensives against Zionism. So this sounds like a narrative.
Speaker 1: And there are two thousand and three books Dalin's Last Crime.
Speaker 1: Jonathan Brent and Vladimir Namov published evidence that Stalin was
Speaker 1: almost certainly murdered in nineteen fifty three after he began
Speaker 1: moving toward exercising Zionists influence in Soviet circles of power.
Speaker 1: Describing Stalin's moves against the zionist's elements in Russia, Brent
Speaker 1: so it's okay. And again this is another thing, like
Speaker 1: if you want to separate Stalin from the Cheka, I
Speaker 1: don't know how you would do that. But you say, well,
Speaker 1: that was pre Stalin times. What was that nineteen twenty eight,
Speaker 1: that was pre Stolen times? That during the revolution they
Speaker 1: did all this horrible stuff through the Czecho the It's
Speaker 1: not like he wasn't doing horrible shit too, with the
Speaker 1: same type of you know, forces, with the same goddamn names.
Speaker 1: So it wasn't like it was all a In. What
Speaker 1: was Stalin? Wasn't he also a Jew? Didn't he speak Yiddish?
Speaker 1: Or am I thinking of am I thinking of Lenin,
Speaker 1: whose children spoke Itddish too, I think that might have
Speaker 1: been Lenin. Describing Stalin's moves against the Zionist elements in Russia,
Speaker 1: Brenton Almov wrote that if Stalin had not been removed
Speaker 1: from power, much subsequent world history might have been quite different.
Speaker 1: They added, many leading Kremlin figures would have been purged
Speaker 1: and probably shot. The security services and military would have
Speaker 1: been decimated by purges, right murder. So intellectuals and artists, particular,
Speaker 1: particularly Jews. First of all, intellectuals and artists They love
Speaker 1: to pair themselves as being smarter than they are, or
Speaker 1: that they have some kind of creativity that they don't.
Speaker 1: Just if anything, they steal ideas and they and they
Speaker 1: do all kinds of other shit, but not magical, wonderful people.
Speaker 1: What they do is they turn the arts into garbage
Speaker 1: so that they can become you know, leaders of it.
Speaker 1: They're not. There's nothing wonderful that these freaking things produce
Speaker 1: intellectuals because they come up with sick ways of harming
Speaker 1: people that thinks them intellectuals. What do we get out
Speaker 1: of them? You know, a weaponized evil method of eugenics
Speaker 1: and Jewish supremacy, which means you can just basically do
Speaker 1: whatever you want and use use a book that they
Speaker 1: wrote that justifies all of their actions. Sounds great. Actually,
Speaker 1: probably two books I think they would. You could throw
Speaker 1: the New Testament in that as well. I mean ron
Speaker 1: Sobia intellectuals, artists in particular Jews would have been mercilessly suppressed,
Speaker 1: and the surviving remnant of Soviet and Eastern European jury
Speaker 1: would have been gravely, perhaps im mortally imperiled, while grievous
Speaker 1: suffering would have been inflicted on all the citizens So
Speaker 1: this is the bigger problem here, is that all of
Speaker 1: Russia suffers under any of these types of leaders another
Speaker 1: and these people of the of Russia, not this freaking
Speaker 1: stupid name here, but of Russia. We should be considering
Speaker 1: our answer, you know, our relatives and the people themselves,
Speaker 1: if they're not brainwashed and I don't think they can
Speaker 1: be in the current era of Putin to be non
Speaker 1: sympathetic to rational thought, we should be considering them as
Speaker 1: allies or these potential allies that we could work with
Speaker 1: against the common evil. Another great terror, such as occurred
Speaker 1: in the late nineteen thirties, was averted when Stalin suddenly
Speaker 1: died on March fifth, nineteen fifty three. Stalin's version of
Speaker 1: a final solution remained unfulfilled. Fuck your final solution. See again.
Speaker 1: This is also coming from Piper, who believes that the
Speaker 1: he calls people Nazis and believes that what what the
Speaker 1: narrative is about Germany? So you have to consider that,
Speaker 1: And so how did you do so well researching and
Speaker 1: still believe in this shit? And how can you be
Speaker 1: so against the Zionist element or the Jewish supremacy and
Speaker 1: still not look into fucking World War two. Unless these
Speaker 1: people are still somewhat controlled op or stupid. They just
Speaker 1: assumed the rest they assumed the freaking World War two.
Speaker 1: Isn't that kind of like the place you'd want to
Speaker 1: look first to see how freaking valid anything that they
Speaker 1: say is, and then look at the Bible and see
Speaker 1: how much bullshit there is there. And although even today
Speaker 1: there are those, including many illegitimate and traditional American anti communists,
Speaker 1: who believes Stalin was actually in alliance with Zionist interests,
Speaker 1: as evidenced by his immediate recognition of the state of Israel,
Speaker 1: Well why would he do that if he was right?
Speaker 1: Brenton Namov comment that in nineteen forty eight the Jews
Speaker 1: in Israel were not yet the enemies of the Soviet state.
Speaker 1: They soon became right. Explain away, explain away. So the
Speaker 1: point is this a very real rift. See, I don't
Speaker 1: know if that's true. One long in development between Stalin
Speaker 1: and the Zionist and the Zionist and Trotsky elements was
Speaker 1: very much a reality popular legend outwithstanding in fact, by
Speaker 1: nineteen fifty two, when Stalin was intensifying his public end
Speaker 1: behind the scenes campaign against Zionism, all this wasn't done
Speaker 1: in secret. Right, We're just supposed to take the people
Speaker 1: who write about its word for it. He's doing this
Speaker 1: behind the counter right against Zionism in Russia. Brent and
Speaker 1: Naumov point out that the irony that many American Jewish
Speaker 1: vis for the Soviet Union would have found it hard
Speaker 1: to imagine that they were working for a country whose
Speaker 1: leaders soon thereafter would turn against the entire Jewish population
Speaker 1: of the Soviet Union, and at the highest government levels
Speaker 1: was seriously considering the idea of detention and deportation of
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of innocent people. Well,
Speaker 1: if they're Oyves, they weren't exactly innocent, so let's not
Speaker 1: talk about that bullshit. In fact, in the January February
Speaker 1: two thousand and three issue of The Barnes Review, the revisionists,
Speaker 1: especially if they're spies, they're actively working for Zionist causes,
Speaker 1: which means they're freaking malicious murderers and child harmers. They're
Speaker 1: not innocent people. Again, Michael Conn's Piper, you're failing really
Speaker 1: bad with your I mean, I know that was a quote,
Speaker 1: but why did you use that one. In fact, in
Speaker 1: the January February two thousand and three issue of The
Speaker 1: Barnes Review, The Revisionist History Journal, published by Willis a Carto. Again,
Speaker 1: when you call yourself a revisionist, you're calling yourself a liar.
Speaker 1: So when people a dawn on these words like Nazi
Speaker 1: or neo, neo idiot instead of just calling yourself a
Speaker 1: nationalist or a socialist or a national socialist or whatever
Speaker 1: the fuck, you know, socialism means the way Germany meant it,
Speaker 1: the way Hitler meant it, not the way they meant it,
Speaker 1: you know. Or you can call yourself American nationalist if
Speaker 1: you're here, but to call yourself a Nazi, you're calling
Speaker 1: yourself a revisionist. You're basically saying I'm reforming the way
Speaker 1: the you know, the history occurred to suit my you know,
Speaker 1: my view of it. Well, that's not true if you're
Speaker 1: if anybody is a revisionist. And I say this every time,
Speaker 1: but it has to be said. It's the people who
Speaker 1: lie about the truth, you know. They they take the facts,
Speaker 1: ignore them, and they fabricate as a history for us,
Speaker 1: and they spread that like it's reality. That's revising because
Speaker 1: there's only one fact, there's only one truth to how
Speaker 1: something happened, and there's perspectives and points of view and
Speaker 1: vantage points and all that, but it's still, you know,
Speaker 1: car hits person, person fall down. It's not it's not
Speaker 1: if everybody sees it from whatever angle, they still see
Speaker 1: car hits person, person hits ground. There's only one way
Speaker 1: to report that. The revisionist history journal published by willis
Speaker 1: a carto Russian nationalist nationalist historian doctor Olig platinoav Platinov Platonov,
Speaker 1: I don't know, offered readers a fascinating history of Russia's
Speaker 1: historic troubles with a Jewish a Zionists and Jewish bolsheric agitation.
Speaker 1: So people that wrote books about something that's where you're
Speaker 1: getting at. So in two thousand and three, I'm going
Speaker 1: to talk about something that happened fifty literally fifty years ago.
Speaker 1: So it definitely wasn't there myself. And you're going to
Speaker 1: then just fabricate whatever needs to be said to make
Speaker 1: things make sense to you. Platinov asserted flag out that
Speaker 1: Stalin had indeed launched a major offensive against Zionism. As
Speaker 1: the word of Platinov, one of the leading Russian intellectuals
Speaker 1: today and who is in the forefront of the fight
Speaker 1: against Zionist's influence in the twenty first century Russia are
Speaker 1: worth reviewing. Platinov wrote, the Jewish Bolshevik rule over Russia
Speaker 1: was broken by Stalin, who in the second half of
Speaker 1: the nineteen thirties carried out a counter revolution and stripped
Speaker 1: the carriers of the Zionist ideology of their power. In
Speaker 1: the nineteen thirties and forties, no less than eighty sorry
Speaker 1: eight hundred thousand Jewish Bolsheviks were annihilated. Under the leadership
Speaker 1: of Stalin, the elite of the Anti Russian organization, which
Speaker 1: had planned to transferorm Russia into a Jewish state. Nearly
Speaker 1: all Jewish leaders were pergs, and the chances of the
Speaker 1: remaining ones to regain power were reduced to a minimum.
Speaker 1: The last years of Stalin's life were dedicated to the
Speaker 1: uprooting of Zionism and the liquidation of the organization associated
Speaker 1: with it. Doctor Platinov added these highly relevant details. After
Speaker 1: Stalin's death, everything everything changed abruptly. The state was taken
Speaker 1: over by the people bent on the restoration of Jewish Bolshevism.
Speaker 1: The renaissance of Zionism continued during the entire government of Khrushchev.
Speaker 1: The situation somewhat improved under Breznev, who secretly limited the
Speaker 1: number of Jews and government. Why am I hearing this noise?
Speaker 1: Is somebody in the room. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: these measures were rarely put into practice, and both secret
Speaker 1: and open Zionists found many ways to elude them. From
Speaker 1: the nineteen fifties to nineteen seventies, a powerful fifth column,
Speaker 1: spearheaded by the carriers of the Zionist ideology arose in Russia.
Speaker 1: Many of its leader leading figures were sons or grandsons
Speaker 1: of Bolshevik revolutionaries. These very people later became the most
Speaker 1: active elements in the so called Perastrika, which led to
Speaker 1: the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the assumption of political
Speaker 1: power by the Jews, and the transfer of a considerable
Speaker 1: part of Russia's national wealth to foreign countries. Today, of course,
Speaker 1: the fight against Russian sorry, the fight against Zionist influence
Speaker 1: in Russia, has expanded considerably, and Russia's current president, Vladimir
Speaker 1: Putin is increasingly under the gun from American base and
Speaker 1: worldwide Zionist elements who view hit the so called Russian
Speaker 1: strong man as a potential threat and later chapter will
Speaker 1: discuss putin further, I haven't gotten to that part yet
Speaker 1: in my reading. I'm a little bit. I'm about one
Speaker 1: hundred pages ahead of us here. The point that we
Speaker 1: need to focus on and which must be emphasized, is
Speaker 1: that the break between Stalin and and the Zionists, which
Speaker 1: began in the nineteen thirties and which reached a fever
Speaker 1: pitch at the time of Stalin's assassination in nineteen fifty three,
Speaker 1: led specifically to events in the United States, which played
Speaker 1: a major part in behind the scenes intrigue in the
Speaker 1: so called Cold War. This led to the establishment of
Speaker 1: the power the power block that today in the twenty
Speaker 1: first century is known as the Neo concern movement. Now
Speaker 1: that part I don't disagree with. I don't think that
Speaker 1: I'm in Zionism and neo conservative stuff that I mean that,
Speaker 1: of course they're pro Israel, but that's because the whole government,
Speaker 1: in the whole entire, because it's not government we were.
Speaker 1: We were issue before Israel was Israel. So of course
Speaker 1: people in politics will be pro Israel. Would you consider
Speaker 1: a Trump and Neocon. He's the biggest Zionis there is,
Speaker 1: and he's not in you not considered a neo conservative.
Speaker 1: I don't believe. Maybe I thought Paul Ryan was more
Speaker 1: of it like that than Trump. That is the zionis
Speaker 1: Strotsky a globalist warmongers who are using the wealth and
Speaker 1: power of the United States to enforce their world imperium.
Speaker 1: I think I think the problem I have is people
Speaker 1: dividing lines where it doesn't really make a difference. It's like,
Speaker 1: why are you making distinction here? That's not really all that.
Speaker 1: It's like, there's the it's shallow roots.
Speaker 9: Right.
Speaker 1: In nineteen fourteen, no less than vi Lenin r of Trotsky,
Speaker 1: Comrade Trotsky has never yet possessed a defended a definite
Speaker 1: opinion on any single earnest Marxian question. He has always
Speaker 1: crept into the breach made by his or that made
Speaker 1: by this or that difference, and has oscillated from one
Speaker 1: side to the to another. So he's saying, Comrade Trotsky
Speaker 1: has never yet to possessed a definite opinion on any
Speaker 1: single ernest Marxian question. And that's the nineteen fourteen No
Speaker 1: less than vi Lenin.
Speaker 5: Wrote of p.
Speaker 1: Trotsky, and has oscillated from one side together. And this
Speaker 1: reflects precisely the way, So many American Trotskites who become
Speaker 1: became the neo consertives actually shifted their own agenda in
Speaker 1: order to fit with the times. Particularly No, it's because
Speaker 1: they don't have a real agenda other than the murder
Speaker 1: and make make their freaking their Jewish supremacy. You know,
Speaker 1: they don't have ideas and thoughts. Trotsky was supposed to
Speaker 1: be the super genius. He wasn't one people just had
Speaker 1: the will to do horrible things, and he'd like to
Speaker 1: carry out murders himself. That's that's that's what they support
Speaker 1: and praise as other waveveys. That that's what makes somebody
Speaker 1: a brilliant man in their eyes, somebody who's willing to
Speaker 1: do the dirty work and isn't afraid to get the
Speaker 1: sands dirty and his reflect okay, or be you know,
Speaker 1: too close to danger because they're all a bunch of
Speaker 1: fucking cowards. I think I hear my daughter, Hold one second, Yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe Soviet government continued behind the scenes, so we I
Speaker 1: just say against Zionists influence. So although many American anti
Speaker 1: communists and all right anti Zionists and anti Semites were
Speaker 1: caught up in the theory that Soviet Communism under Stalin
Speaker 1: had been largely a Jewish project, so to speak. There
Speaker 1: were a few discerning voices who recognized that the fight
Speaker 1: between Stalin and Trotsky had a definitive Jewish slant that
Speaker 1: needed to be examined in careful context. In the late
Speaker 1: nineteen fifties, John H. Monk, the American nationalist frankly, let's
Speaker 1: say American American nationalists and frankly anti Semitic, Which is
Speaker 1: that a bad thing? And it's not even a real
Speaker 1: technical term to did he hate Arabs? Because what are
Speaker 1: we talking about here? Semitic is a language group, Semi
Speaker 1: is a language Semitic, so those people aren't even fucking that,
Speaker 1: So please stop using stupid words. Just because stupid people
Speaker 1: use stupid words doesn't mean you have to repeat them.
Speaker 1: Anti Semitic. Editor of the Texas based journal Grassroots published
Speaker 1: a remarkable essay entitled let us look into this thing
Speaker 1: called Trotsky Communism. He concluded, after an extensive review of
Speaker 1: the history of the conflict between Stalin and Trotsky, that
Speaker 1: put simply in, Trotsky Communism and Soviet communism are enemies.
Speaker 1: And if that's it, I think we're talking about people,
Speaker 1: not ideologies. This is where I think there's a problem here.
Speaker 1: I think they might not have liked the way they
Speaker 1: were doing things each other, and Stalin was more of
Speaker 1: the aggressive, I'm going to kill your ass type. That's
Speaker 1: why I don't think Kaganovich would have the balls that
Speaker 1: they're knowing what happened to Drosky to even you know,
Speaker 1: rip something up and throw him in his face, and
Speaker 1: where the hell was his secret service should have ripped
Speaker 1: the Kaganovitch's arms off and beat him over thehead with
Speaker 1: him and Soviet Russia, as Monk noted, beginning in the
Speaker 1: late nineteen thirties, top ranking Jews began at the time
Speaker 1: at that time toppling from their high seats, and that
Speaker 1: Russia at last had gotten her eyes So I think
Speaker 1: if anything was anti jude On Zionists, because he's like, no,
Speaker 1: these all these motherfuckers are doing this. It's all about
Speaker 1: there hid an agenda, which is, you know, Zionism is
Speaker 1: the freaking shield, because that's all about Jewish supremacy and
Speaker 1: getting you know, control over things and harming and destroying
Speaker 1: and crippling all nations. Russia at last had gotten her
Speaker 1: own her eyes open, and that the good work started
Speaker 1: in nineteen twenty eight with the exiling of Trotsky by
Speaker 1: Joseph Stalin. For anybody to call anything that Stalin did
Speaker 1: good work with the amount of people he murdered are
Speaker 1: absolutely goddamn insane or stupid. You shouldn't even listen to
Speaker 1: them anywhere if they say that the good work and
Speaker 1: the word Stalin come up in the same sentence. Yes,
Speaker 1: some problems, bro he added quite poignantly. Just recently in
Speaker 1: the Anti Defamation League issued a special bulletin in which
Speaker 1: it wept sorely because the Russian Jews used to fill
Speaker 1: back in nineteen thirty five ten percent of the high
Speaker 1: seats in the Empire, and now they only have one
Speaker 1: half of one percent, and it is shaky. The wonder
Speaker 1: the American Jew Trotsky gang invented the slogan down with Communism,
Speaker 1: they mean Russia. Monk pointed out that the Zionist movement
Speaker 1: and affiliated groups such as the Adel had quickly aligned
Speaker 1: themselves with the Trotskyite movement that set up shop in
Speaker 1: the United States in the New York City in New
Speaker 1: York City in particular, upon Trotsky's exile from Russia. If
Speaker 1: we run with the Trotsky Communism slogan, down with the Communists,
Speaker 1: we automatically become partisans of the filthiest underground that has
Speaker 1: ever existed anywhere on this earth, trotsky communism. Monks ex
Speaker 1: essays at least got that part. Monk's essays on this
Speaker 1: controversial topic were even reprinted by frame by Fames Liryl
Speaker 1: Clark van Heining in her popular Women's Voice newsletter, which
Speaker 1: no one ever accused of being a Communist journal On
Speaker 1: September fifteenth, nineteen sixty nine, writing in the popular American
Speaker 1: nationalist newspaper Common Sense, which had over the years frequently
Speaker 1: featured the works of outspoken Jewish born American anti Zionist
Speaker 1: spokesman It's a lot of words, Benjamin Friedman Morris Hortant,
Speaker 1: under his pen name Fred Ferrell, wrote a fascinating assessment
Speaker 1: of the reality of Trotskye communism. Ortant wrote, in part, originally,
Speaker 1: originally communism was nothing but a tool of the wealthy
Speaker 1: American Jews of New York, in the United States and
Speaker 1: in much of the rest of the world. It is
Speaker 1: still just that. Let us now address ourselves to a
Speaker 1: question important to anyone who really wants to understand communism.
Speaker 1: What is the difference between a Stalinist and the Trostae.
Speaker 1: Some people will tell you all communists are like well,
Speaker 1: if you understand where communistism came fro him, came out
Speaker 1: of the mister schools that came out of like we're
Speaker 1: talking five thousand years ago, Like this is the way
Speaker 1: life was for Goths and you know Northern Europeans if
Speaker 1: you want to call them, that came onto the scene
Speaker 1: and started streatening fucking people out. This is the dark
Speaker 1: ages of that that they don't talk about. That that's
Speaker 1: what Thor and his and his son's eradicated for a time,
Speaker 1: for a short time, for a couple of hundred years,
Speaker 1: and built kingdoms and brought culture and civilization and innovation
Speaker 1: and inspiration and monotheism and monogamy. Because these are all
Speaker 1: a bunch of sex cults too, which is whatever. But
Speaker 1: they did a lot of six shit. I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: not going to be anti you know, have a good time.
Speaker 1: But at the same time, there's there's sick magic rituals
Speaker 1: involved in it too. This is a dangerous piece of
Speaker 1: shallow misinformation. It is acceptible only if you are willing
Speaker 1: to substitute shallow sloganeering or real now just as I'm talking,
Speaker 1: a Stalinist represents primordial Russian nash. I don't believe that
Speaker 1: he was a fucking scumback to Russian people. So why
Speaker 1: would that be a true thing, And why would they
Speaker 1: have a guy like that in their midst of this,
Speaker 1: you know, Bolshevik takeover of Russia. Why would they Why
Speaker 1: would he even be part of that? If this was true,
Speaker 1: None of this, Timmy, sounds like bullshit, flat out bullshit. Why.
Speaker 1: I don't understand the real, the real why yet, But
Speaker 1: it sounds like they're building upon a you know, to
Speaker 1: to build a foundation for yet another lias to what
Speaker 1: was the Cold War, because I think people are seeing
Speaker 1: through that now, what is it? What does it matter?
Speaker 1: How many people even think about this shit anymore? I think,
Speaker 1: and I think this takes away from the simple fact
Speaker 1: that we are actually the first to be under this
Speaker 1: type of system. It's just that we weren't. We weren't
Speaker 1: treated the same way you know, innocent Russians were yet
Speaker 1: because it wasn't our time. Yet we were being used
Speaker 1: in a different way to die for fucking wars and
Speaker 1: to die for their fucking medical you know, that was
Speaker 1: introduced to us by the Rockefellers, and all natural medicine destroyed,
Speaker 1: so they still get to have their their their pain
Speaker 1: and suffering of mankind, just stretched out over a longer
Speaker 1: period of time until they're done using us for something,
Speaker 1: and then they'll then they're going to implement the same
Speaker 1: type of shit that was going on in Russia or
Speaker 1: worse now because the technology is more advanced. A world
Speaker 1: communist conspiracy is not a Russian conspiracy. It is an
Speaker 1: American Jewish conspiracy. That's what he says. I'm gonna pause
Speaker 1: for a second. I think I'm gonna try to say
Speaker 1: good night to my daughter real quick, and then I'll
Speaker 1: be back. I just don't want to miss so cause
Speaker 1: I think I'm gonna be leaving in middle of the night,
Speaker 1: probably around three o'clock in the morning, to go to
Speaker 1: La to get bottles so that i'm there when they open.
Speaker 1: I've lost my hour. Usually it's an hour earlier when
Speaker 1: I get there, right because I have the hour difference
Speaker 1: because we don't do daily a saving sign. But it's
Speaker 1: sorry changed, so now I don't I lose that hour.
Speaker 1: Let's see, how can we put up here? We got
Speaker 1: for fun stuff? Did I put anything up for her.
Speaker 1: I thought I had how much time do I need? No,
Speaker 1: not that much. Let's just find something quick. Yeah, I was.
Speaker 1: I would like to get Joe Saddlin back on, like
Speaker 1: even though he was if he was an editor on
Speaker 1: a Cropoco was because it was for good reasons. I
Speaker 1: can't say the same for stew And I can't say
Speaker 1: the same for that piece of buying shit Andrew Kaufman.
Speaker 1: He's a psychiatrist, for Christ's sake. How can you give?
Speaker 1: You can't? You just can't. I can't line Creden sack up. Yeah, bullshit?
Speaker 1: What if?
Speaker 6: What if?
Speaker 1: The hell do we think?
Speaker 5: Uh uh?
Speaker 1: John Carpenter and Chevy Chase. Yeah, I'm sure it's not
Speaker 1: gonna be positive. I don't usually watch anything on YouTube,
Speaker 1: so I'm looking for something out there for some reason
Speaker 1: on the why Yeah, oie oye of this fag.
Speaker 12: H.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, I know what I'm gonna do. I
Speaker 1: know I'm gonna send you. I know what kind of
Speaker 1: poop I'm gonna fling in your face. I'll make you
Speaker 1: watch what I was watching. Alright, let's see r f B.
Speaker 1: We're yet. It's so hard to listen to him sometimes,
Speaker 1: but This one is titled and Rocking. You're not gonna
Speaker 1: watch the whole thing, don't worry about it. Where did
Speaker 1: it go? The fuck? All right, don't worry. Not gonna
Speaker 1: watch all of it because it's seventeen goddamn minutes long.
Speaker 1: So it's okay, let's w let's start with this on
Speaker 1: This was from yesterday. It says the dollar is gone
Speaker 1: in less than six months and Trump will be the catalyst.
Speaker 1: So I don't know what the hell that's all about.
Speaker 1: I haven't heard that, but we'll just go with it, right, Smeg,
Speaker 1: And don't tell that. Oh, you gotta be kidding me. Okay, hell,
Speaker 1: I gotcha? All right, here it comes. That's why I said.
Speaker 1: That's what That's not what she said I was. I
Speaker 1: won't say that, but she was there.
Speaker 7: All right.
Speaker 1: I'll be back a second, Bostin.
Speaker 2: It's the ninth, it's March. It's twenty twenty five, and
Speaker 2: h I've been busy for the last to that.
Speaker 1: Nice, right, nice.
Speaker 2: I had a little accident with my truck and I
Speaker 2: caused some serious damage to the rear end of it,
Speaker 2: and for the last five days of it at my
Speaker 2: buddy shop working on it. And we thought we had
Speaker 2: it fixed. We thought we had it all squared away,
Speaker 2: only to put everything back together and drive it realized
Speaker 2: there was still another issue. So I'm stuck here. There's
Speaker 2: just no joke. I'm stuck here in a like a
Speaker 2: very inexpensive hotel, but it had like a nine star rating.
Speaker 2: I'm literally using my starlink right now because the hotel
Speaker 2: doesn't have the Internet, you.
Speaker 15: Know what I mean?
Speaker 2: In whatever, whatever it is, what it is, it is
Speaker 2: what it is. But I got a lot to cover
Speaker 2: this video because I haven't covered a lot in videos
Speaker 2: as of late. And let's start with this real quick.
Speaker 2: I did a video on this young lady, Gabby Patito
Speaker 2: and her scumbag boyfriend that strangled her and bashed her
Speaker 2: head open and murdered her. And all sorts of people
Speaker 2: in the comments are like, Richie, that was a siop
Speaker 2: because that girl's wearing a Zion shirt. And yeah, you
Speaker 2: know what, it's not a SiO because, believe it or not,
Speaker 2: when this occurred, I was out there. You see that shirt.
Speaker 2: She's wearing Zion outdoors. She's in Moab and everything is
Speaker 2: called Zion. Every person that goes to Moab buys a
Speaker 2: T shirt except me, that says Zion, National Park, et cetera.
Speaker 2: And it astonishes me that people are like, oh, that's
Speaker 2: a siop because thirty three was in there and Zion
Speaker 2: and this, that and the other thing. Yeah, but some
Speaker 2: of us that live in the real world, some of
Speaker 2: us that don't get all of our conspiracies off of
Speaker 2: the Internet because we never leave our home state or
Speaker 2: our house. I was looking for her as she was
Speaker 2: mia in Wyoming. Literally, Okay, I'm quite familiar with this
Speaker 2: entire Why I did a video on this is because
Speaker 2: Netflix did a video and I thought they left her
Speaker 2: murderous boyfriend and her scum bag in laws or whatever
Speaker 2: you know, the murderer's parents. They left them off the
Speaker 2: hook a little too easy, and in this video I
Speaker 2: didn't pull any punches whatsoever at all. And funny story is,
Speaker 2: there's no syop here. Okay, he killed her. But the
Speaker 2: thing is is I might have to do a part too,
Speaker 2: because I don't think this kid's dead. I think his
Speaker 2: parents covered it up. But that's neither here nor there.
Speaker 2: We got a lot going on, so let me get
Speaker 2: into it real quick. Also, Richie, you hate on other channels. Well,
Speaker 2: I comment on other channels that fancy themselves truthers, and many, many, many,
Speaker 2: many many of them are using truth as a commodity.
Speaker 2: And when I see them doing that, yeah, I comment,
Speaker 2: you know why, because lots of us gave up our
Speaker 2: entire reputation, our lives, everything to completely bring truth forward,
Speaker 2: no matter what the cost, no matter if we lost
Speaker 2: all of our channels, no matter what, and watching people
Speaker 2: monetize them or better yet, push stories like the killer
Speaker 2: Fog that's not real at all, and if you drove
Speaker 2: around the United States you'd see that it's not real
Speaker 2: at all. But pushing that and then having secret informers
Speaker 2: and this and that, come on, Yeah, I'm gonna call
Speaker 2: you out if you don't like that. If you like
Speaker 2: your truth entertaining, don't watch my channel ever. Okay, if
Speaker 2: you like your truth halfway there, Alex Jones esc esque, whatever,
Speaker 2: have at it. But let's stick with the real world,
Speaker 2: because we're looking at we're looking straight down the barrel
Speaker 2: some really seriously bad stuff. It is not very often
Speaker 2: you're gonna see me do this, but right now I'm
Speaker 2: going to run this little piece by Dabu seven to
Speaker 2: seven real quick.
Speaker 1: This is Dombu seven.
Speaker 4: It seems that we've entered a moment in time where
Speaker 4: big things are about to change. The currency that you
Speaker 4: use in life and have used all your life is
Speaker 4: about to change as well, because they're about to try
Speaker 4: to digitize this through one big event. To lay out
Speaker 4: the groundwork for this, they had to go global, and
Speaker 4: they're about to implement it. And it was all scheduled
Speaker 4: to begin March tenth, the same day as this Federal
Speaker 4: Reserve Bank Board meeting that is closed to the public.
Speaker 1: They were going to launch this.
Speaker 4: They're now saying they're going to sunset this till July
Speaker 4: fourteenth of twenty twenty five, meaning that we have a
Speaker 4: window that has opened here of time where they are
Speaker 4: implementing this brand new way that they're transferring money via
Speaker 4: cross border payments and digitizing everything and connecting it to
Speaker 4: the ledgers, to the blockchain. And this was supposed to
Speaker 4: be all rolled out on the tenth. I've warned about
Speaker 4: this many times, but now they've like open this up
Speaker 4: to where it expands out where it's going to be
Speaker 4: a slow rollout, but it's begun or beginning.
Speaker 1: They are going to phase out the old Let me
Speaker 1: just say, I can't stand the way this guy has
Speaker 1: is his voice. It gets a little annoying both way
Speaker 1: of sending. On March ninth, that was what the scheduled
Speaker 1: procedure was. So now they're giving it more time to
Speaker 1: be fully implemented and rolled out here globally. This opens
Speaker 1: the door for that world currency to be rolled out.
Speaker 1: Every word I say is needs to be emphasized in
Speaker 1: every syllable because I don't understand what the hell's important.
Speaker 1: So I just lose all the time every time I
Speaker 1: say word shut up, dude, God damn it.
Speaker 4: Talk normal talk, straight talk two people. Now, what Trump's
Speaker 4: done in the United States is he's already started attacking
Speaker 4: the Fiat currency almost immediately he came in, and he's
Speaker 4: ordered that they do away with minting pennies. Pennies will
Speaker 4: no longer be produced by the United States. The nickel
Speaker 4: will be next.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, so they're taking him. They're making a penny
Speaker 1: into a mole hill. I mean, I get, I get
Speaker 1: it starts for someplace, right, it's till mile. I get it.
Speaker 1: But I mean, come on, they're extrapolating a little bit here,
Speaker 1: rip four and a German knee arms. Well, that's good
Speaker 1: to better. They're not Germany anymore. To better, they are
Speaker 1: a bunch of fucking you know, they're destroyed in conquered
Speaker 1: territory until twenty ninety nine. Why and know why because
Speaker 1: that's how long they are in control of their school system.
Speaker 1: So they're not going to have the proper understanding of
Speaker 1: who they are, what they are, where they came from,
Speaker 1: and what happened to them for many years to come. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: unless someone pulls them out of that fog and helps them,
Speaker 1: they're all going to be self hating, so armed or not,
Speaker 1: that's going to be a totally jew construction there.
Speaker 4: And they'll go right on down the line saying that
Speaker 4: they cost too much to make and they're just going
Speaker 4: to remove them from the system. It's exactly what he's
Speaker 4: ordered us far. Now we have all this talk of
Speaker 4: the blockchain system being incorporated full scale, and the people
Speaker 4: that were worried about a CBDC that want to say, oh,
Speaker 4: Trump signed an executive order against the CPDC. That was
Speaker 4: just a buffalo the people that didn't know anything about it,
Speaker 4: because with the other hand, he turned around and he
Speaker 4: gave you blockchain via his trump coin and backs world.
Speaker 1: My god, I can't hear this guy anyone. We're done
Speaker 1: with him hyperventilating freak. Okay, well you know, points made,
Speaker 1: points not made. I guess i'll know. So I'm looking
Speaker 1: over here on let me put it up so people
Speaker 1: could say, hello, chats what happened? There you go? Hm,
Speaker 1: I don't need to see my face there. There we go.
Speaker 1: So it says, oh, well there's a lot huhuh. So
Speaker 1: I didn't hear that little chining. Time to go off.
Speaker 1: So let me say, I guess here is a great
Speaker 1: Daniel job is not helping deal with the Jewish problem exactly.
Speaker 1: And that's where we left off. Yes, I listened to
Speaker 1: the entire stream. I found it rather ud. I found
Speaker 1: that rather rod I wish I was. I saw that
Speaker 1: when I came out, so I knew exactly what it was.
Speaker 1: Emj Emblot Jones commenting on Zach. Yeah, it's weird exactly,
Speaker 1: And why would he have that in his possession unless
Speaker 1: it was a give and take back and forth. You know,
Speaker 1: you say something bad about me, I present some information,
Speaker 1: and here it is Zach's being talked about again, and
Speaker 1: it's like it just seems like it's all self promotion
Speaker 1: or you know, cross promotion to me, and it sounds
Speaker 1: like it's fake, and it's it's at the expense of
Speaker 1: everybode else who wants to get on with things and
Speaker 1: be sincere and not have stupid, petty, freaking soap opera fights.
Speaker 1: Go if you guys are within here's the thing. Coward's
Speaker 1: talk shit from behind their computer when they don't think
Speaker 1: that anything's gonna happen to them. It's very pathetic thing
Speaker 1: to do. So if you're going to do that, be
Speaker 1: prepared for people to call you out at number one,
Speaker 1: number two if they are within a you know what
Speaker 1: would be considered a not so crazy distance, right, you know,
Speaker 1: if it's not too far away, you should confront the
Speaker 1: person in person, in person rather than on the internet,
Speaker 1: if you really have a problem with them, and be
Speaker 1: a man about it or better, Yeah, at least if
Speaker 1: you're going to contact them, don't leave a message on
Speaker 1: your social media talking shit about them like it like
Speaker 1: exacted or in some rare obscure video that he said
Speaker 1: something about me, And why don't you just talk if
Speaker 1: you have the ability to communicate with all the social
Speaker 1: media stuff that we already are attached to, and we're
Speaker 1: in a FTJ group on the telegram, Why don't you
Speaker 1: address the person directly? If you have questions or concerned
Speaker 1: about something that I said, and you want them to
Speaker 1: clarify their position on something, why don't you do that first?
Speaker 1: Unless you have no character, unless you have no decency yourself,
Speaker 1: and in which case, what the hell are you doing
Speaker 1: on FTJ? Zach, You shouldn't be here. You don't belong here.
Speaker 1: I don't care who the fuck is Stew the fucking
Speaker 1: agent the operative Peter thinks about you, and if he
Speaker 1: likes you, there might say a lot about you there, Zachi.
Speaker 1: It'll a fag, sir. They do lead all of this.
Speaker 1: They have successfully done the plan. What comes is the fall.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure why it is not seen in this
Speaker 1: perspective order you're talking about the Jews, you're talking about me,
Speaker 1: of course, I know all that. I'm just saying, what's
Speaker 1: the schism in this whole communism thing? Communism? You know
Speaker 1: what I mean? It's like, say, fucker, thanks you for
Speaker 1: your donation. Okay, thanks to the fucker fuck is your
Speaker 1: real fuck? Stupid people? That's what he says. Yes, agreed,
Speaker 1: Let's see some of these things.
Speaker 12: I just have.
Speaker 1: I think there might have been like a picture or
Speaker 1: like some kind of icon there, because I just see
Speaker 1: a zero and like three slash. I'm not sure what
Speaker 1: this doesn't mean. Bullshalism, communism, Judaism, and Zionism. Yes, exactly,
Speaker 1: exactly same goddamn shit, right, thank you, And it's all
Speaker 1: from the same fucking people. These are all concepts brought
Speaker 1: by them. That doesn't mean that other people, just like
Speaker 1: anything else, you set up a freaking you set up
Speaker 1: a booth, you set up a tent, you set up
Speaker 1: a sign, you said you're open for business, and other
Speaker 1: people come to the booth doesn't mean right. It's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: it does attract other unstable fucking idiots to it who
Speaker 1: think that there's something for them to gain from it
Speaker 1: or for some crazy that I don't know, poorly raised
Speaker 1: reason like their parents were terrible human beings, made a
Speaker 1: child who actually thought this was a good thing. So
Speaker 1: therefore there it is. Right. Can you guys even see
Speaker 1: that night? You can't. I have it on my screen
Speaker 1: and you guys can't say that shit, I made it bigger,
Speaker 1: but you can't see it. That's weird anyway. I don't
Speaker 1: think you could anyway. But you can see that bullshism, economism, judaism,
Speaker 1: and scionism. If you live in a nation where you
Speaker 1: defend yourself and get charged with a crime and sued
Speaker 1: by the criminals, that says it all exactly exactly. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we don't live in the constitutional republic, of course not,
Speaker 1: and I hope a lot of people understand that. But
Speaker 1: at the same time, we also don't have anything that
Speaker 1: resembles a friendly, non malicious environment here. It's all run
Speaker 1: by the freaking criminals. It's all run by the oyvays
Speaker 1: of the world. And deeper than that, these these are
Speaker 1: the practices that we're around and written about and talked
Speaker 1: about by our ancestors for five thousand goddamn yours what
Speaker 1: these They were horrified by these people, They were disgusted
Speaker 1: with them. And then and then they they they mix
Speaker 1: up the history to make it everything is so it's
Speaker 1: all it's all Jewish or all Semitic, you know, yeah,
Speaker 1: Babylon and oh yeah, yeah, Sumer was all us too,
Speaker 1: and Nimrod was up No, there wasn't, it wasn't And
Speaker 1: then you know, and then they flip it around and say,
Speaker 1: in addition to that, they were all bad people because
Speaker 1: they don't want you to look any closer to it.
Speaker 1: The weather has been used as a weapon for decades. Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: I agree, I think maybe longer than that. That makes
Speaker 1: me wonder, like the whole you know, reset thing, how
Speaker 1: many times and it was five thousand years ago, or
Speaker 1: give your take, maybe six thousand years ago, the last time,
Speaker 1: the last big one, last full one, you know, And
Speaker 1: if so, then that would we leave the possibility that
Speaker 1: technology was still uh at a certain stage of advancement
Speaker 1: somewhere that they could have used and employed during these
Speaker 1: times where their little, their little play didn't turn out
Speaker 1: the way they thought it was going to, like when
Speaker 1: Germany started stopping everybody's ass Now use so blatantly it
Speaker 1: is obviously intentional, yep. I am just grateful in the
Speaker 1: madness that is the internal sorry Internet. I am just
Speaker 1: this is rebel of Johnny. I am just grateful in
Speaker 1: the madness that is the Internet as a whole. A
Speaker 1: very thin sliver was cut out to see through the
Speaker 1: curtain of the lie, and I was able to live
Speaker 1: in this truth. I believe I am correct and saying
Speaker 1: it is true, and I can never unsee it correct
Speaker 1: and once you. Once you do see something, it's it's
Speaker 1: really hard to unsee it, especially if it's a it's
Speaker 1: a it's a if it's a state of lower comprehension
Speaker 1: that you're supposed to, you know, go along, to get
Speaker 1: along and be, and it's impossible for you to do that.
Speaker 1: And then rebel John and he also says, Davo seven, Sorry,
Speaker 1: I think Davo right, Davos or is that something else
Speaker 1: started during there was Dabo seven started doing earthquake fear porn.
Speaker 1: I'll have to figure out what that is, but I
Speaker 1: think that goes along with the whole you know, weather
Speaker 1: weapons stuff. Okay, no, I didn't actually click the button.
Speaker 1: Let's see what we got over on ftj.
Speaker 3: O.
Speaker 1: Hey, hey, hey, says Mike uh Garland, and he also
Speaker 1: said Trumps and he says and then Karen said, uh oh,
Speaker 1: I'm late late late I Daniel, hello, Karen. Okay, let's
Speaker 1: get back to this real quick. I'm gonna skip ahead
Speaker 1: a little bit because we kind of made our point
Speaker 1: in this section. Says most of the communists and many
Speaker 1: of the anti communists are on the same payroll, the
Speaker 1: Jewish payroll. They carry on a sham battle with each other,
Speaker 1: thank you. The first basic ruler rule of this sham
Speaker 1: battle is never dragged any real truth into the matter
Speaker 1: on either side. Tell anything else you want to tell,
Speaker 1: but never tell the truth. This is the basic background
Speaker 1: of most of the phony experts on communism who have
Speaker 1: been experting quote unquote about it for forty years and
Speaker 1: haven't made.
Speaker 6: A dent in it.
Speaker 1: Morton was particularly adamant in pointing out that the American
Speaker 1: anti communist movement was increasingly falling into the hands of
Speaker 1: very real communists at Trotskyites, who, in the guise of
Speaker 1: the fighting of fighting communism, were actually working to introduce
Speaker 1: it into the American system. So here's the thing again,
Speaker 1: Soultrotskyite thing seems to like separate communism or the influence.
Speaker 1: It seems to separate the influence from just just the Jews, right,
Speaker 1: because I think this is this is kind of like
Speaker 1: a ploy almost, because you know, it's just it's just
Speaker 1: those people and their influence and the fact that they
Speaker 1: already run this whole place, and this is how they
Speaker 1: maneuver a quote unquote control because they can't out overtly
Speaker 1: yet at least because they've chosen not to make this
Speaker 1: place like Russia was. They want to do it in
Speaker 1: a different way, and they want to continue to keep
Speaker 1: us thinking that we have this freedom that we don't have.
Speaker 1: So the why do they do They infiltrate the politics,
Speaker 1: but they already owned the place right, So the called
Speaker 1: Trotskyites or whatever it's like, Okay, these are just extra
Speaker 1: you know, accents different, you know that we don't need.
Speaker 1: It's the Jews are controlling things and doing Jew shit right,
Speaker 1: the power Jews of them all, you know, utilizing religion
Speaker 1: when it's when it's useful for them, and utilizing politics
Speaker 1: when it's useful for them, and always being control of
Speaker 1: the money that makes everybody else to skip a dance
Speaker 1: and jump team. This is a point of view, that
Speaker 1: point a few anti communist understood. What is he saying,
Speaker 1: Wharton was the anti housiness was increasingly fine, and yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't care about that, let's get into In this essay,
Speaker 1: Horton emphasized that the age old labels of right and
Speaker 1: left no longer had any real meeting. I don't know
Speaker 1: if they ever had a meeting in all lifetimes. It
Speaker 1: definitely didn't. But what Democrat Republican was dead in the
Speaker 1: eighteen thirties, a point that even many legitimate and self
Speaker 1: styled modern day in American conservatives. This is the thing.
Speaker 1: It's like people don't realize that the whole place was
Speaker 1: incinerated already. They're sitting in the in the in the
Speaker 1: burnt house with the burnt frame, and there's there's there's
Speaker 1: they can see the stars. But they still think that
Speaker 1: they live in this house. It's crazy, it's insane to
Speaker 1: think that. And they're still talking as if they have
Speaker 1: this this they're still living in this construct that doesn't
Speaker 1: even it's barely even there. It's just the outline of it. Now,
Speaker 1: there is no genuine validity in either the right or
Speaker 1: left positions in politics. These are artificial jew invented positions.
Speaker 1: No shit called divide and conquer. Jewish control of communications
Speaker 1: is absolutely essential to the success of this power system,
Speaker 1: Jewish political But this sounds like it's like, Okay, thank
Speaker 1: you for the one on one fucking remedial shit. Thank
Speaker 1: you with oh they control the media, thank you.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 1: Really well, that's a revelation. Jewish political quackery would not
Speaker 1: long survive exposure. And that's like how I said quackery,
Speaker 1: because like their medicals and everything that we believe about
Speaker 1: science and medics and is also them. And that's why
Speaker 1: people die when they get their their childhood vacs and
Speaker 1: every other shot that's come out since then, all of
Speaker 1: that has been their sick science, all of it. It's
Speaker 1: them taking the same shit that they would have mixed
Speaker 1: it in a cauldron in a in a in a
Speaker 1: magical freaking you know, cauldron with the witches and sorcerers,
Speaker 1: and then instead of making you drink a potion, they
Speaker 1: injected into your arm. The right left age is the
Speaker 1: Jewish age, and of course they call them the serpent
Speaker 1: cult right because that's that was one of the ones
Speaker 1: that were the sorcerers, because they were actually using true venom.
Speaker 1: And also because you know, an injection isn't I'm gonna
Speaker 1: have to tell that kid to shut the fuck up.
Speaker 1: Hold on, there's they're not his phone fucking sing, just
Speaker 1: fucking making noise to make noise. Eighty d kids man
Speaker 1: as fear. The Right Life age is a Jewish age
Speaker 1: and is an age in which on the state on
Speaker 1: the world stage is now receding into the past. If
Speaker 1: America continues to live in a in this Jewish past,
Speaker 1: then America has no future. Horn's words were in nearly
Speaker 1: fifty years ago, continue to reverberate, but to drive home
Speaker 1: the point further, it is worth reviewing a translation of
Speaker 1: an analysis of Zietism published in Spanish and the November seventh,
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy nine edition Grandma, in the official newspaper Voice
Speaker 1: of the Communist regime of Keep Its Fit. Let's move on,
Speaker 1: Let's just move on, Let's just move on. I don't know, fay,
Speaker 1: this is important. They propagated the thesis that all non
Speaker 1: Jews were it would always be anti Semites, so all
Speaker 1: non use would always be anti Semeis. It doesn't mater
Speaker 1: what you do, So I guess I'm in the clear.
Speaker 1: I'm just as antisemitic as anyone else, just for being
Speaker 1: what I am. Asserted that the only possibility for the
Speaker 1: Jewish masses well being and justice was to immigrate to
Speaker 1: the promised land right and defended class collaboration, thus diverting
Speaker 1: the Jewish proletaria proletariat away from the struggle for their
Speaker 1: real emancipation and dividing and weakening the working class movement.
Speaker 1: It's not fortuitous that in Czari's police archives one finds
Speaker 1: documents calling for support for the Zionist movement as a
Speaker 1: way of stemming the tide of proletarian revolution. Theodore Hertzel
Speaker 1: and this is the reason why I stops, because I
Speaker 1: wanted to see what this is. The founder of Zionism
Speaker 1: route at the time in his diary, all our youth,
Speaker 1: all those who are from twenty to thirty years old,
Speaker 1: will abandon their secure socialist tendencies and come over to me,
Speaker 1: the obscure socialist tendencies. Will you know, socialism, communisms? I'm
Speaker 1: uh right. However, the efforts of Zionism counter revolution could
Speaker 1: not hold back the wheels of history. The victory of
Speaker 1: the Great October Socialist Revolution in Russia ushered in a
Speaker 1: period of transition from capitalism to socialism on a world scale.
Speaker 1: That's not really good either, because it was corporatism basically,
Speaker 1: and capitalism was what kept it going because it can't
Speaker 1: rely on its own nonsense to keep it, you know, alive.
Speaker 1: So if it wasn't for the quote unquote capitalist country
Speaker 1: supplying it with all that it needed because it was
Speaker 1: acting stupid and killing off all the all the farmers,
Speaker 1: there wouldn't have been anything but a bunch of dead people,
Speaker 1: including the revolutionaries. The first victory of the proletaria the
Speaker 1: premise of future victories, was a heavy blow to Zionism.
Speaker 1: Most of the money that filled Zionists coffers came from Russia.
Speaker 1: Well where did that money come from? It came from
Speaker 1: US idiots. All right, that's enough of this nonsense. All right,
Speaker 1: let's move on. We got another record. Chapter I as yeah.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, is this fere It starts? No, no, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: here we go. Let's see. This is Chapter thirteen Zionis
Speaker 1: infiltration of the Soviet KGB and the impact of US
Speaker 1: Intelligence Service, the little known foundation of the birth of
Speaker 1: neo conservatism in America. It doesn't I don't think we
Speaker 1: need to care about this one either. We're gonna move on. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: this doesn't matter to me. We're gonna get into the
Speaker 1: dirt here. I want to talk about the John Birch Society,
Speaker 1: and I want to get in before time is up.
Speaker 1: Chapter fourteen, Trusky eight Communism. I'll call neo conservatives, conservatism
Speaker 1: and the story behind Senator Joseph McCarthy. No, here's where
Speaker 1: it's gonna piss some people off. And I don't know
Speaker 1: if it pissed me off. I don't know. I don't
Speaker 1: know what to make of this because of the other
Speaker 1: stuff I have problems with above it. But the contents
Speaker 1: and much of this chapter will come as a shock
Speaker 1: to modern day American anti communists, and particularly those who
Speaker 1: were active in supporting Senator Joseph ar McCarthy and famed
Speaker 1: the famed Communist Hunter. But certain facts must be made
Speaker 1: a part of recorded history if we are to have
Speaker 1: a faithful profile of the enemy within. That's a nice
Speaker 1: way of I'm not saying this what he's doing. I'm
Speaker 1: just saying people always will tug on your your your
Speaker 1: ethics and morality and spin it with the assumption being
Speaker 1: made that this is what they're they're standing by, and
Speaker 1: that's this is what it means to do that, so
Speaker 1: that people who don't think very deeply don't question, Oh well,
Speaker 1: I mean, I guess you have to do this, and
Speaker 1: I guess you have to accommodate for that because I
Speaker 1: stand up, I stand for that. You know that principle,
Speaker 1: But in reality, just because you talked about the principle
Speaker 1: doesn't mean you're actually standing behind the principle. You could
Speaker 1: be lying straight to their faces and people wouldn't know
Speaker 1: it if they don't look into it. Treachery is many layers, guys,
Speaker 1: you know that. But first, the story of a controversial
Speaker 1: figure who played a secret and actually quite bizarre role
Speaker 1: in helping John F. Kennedy win the presidency in nineteen sixty.
Speaker 1: One of the legendary behind the scenes figures in the
Speaker 1: American Nationalists movement to West Hooker, who died at age
Speaker 1: eighty one in Washington, d C. On September twenty second,
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety nine. Hooker West, to his friends, is now
Speaker 1: a part of history, hidden history, and his remarkable story
Speaker 1: is worth telling for the record, particularly since Hooker's own
Speaker 1: experiences help us document the work of America's Zionist Judas
Speaker 1: goats about Hooker himself a fascinating, a memorable man who
Speaker 1: well deserves this brief tribut born to wealth and privilege.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, so we never lived in reality. That's nice,
Speaker 1: and later married into an immensely wealthy family. WHOA, I guess,
Speaker 1: just everything's on the up for Hooker. Hooker was a
Speaker 1: graduate of Cornell That's about where I still live, not
Speaker 1: too far away from there, and a veteran of World
Speaker 1: War Two, A war, he believed then and until his
Speaker 1: dying day, was a war that need not and should
Speaker 1: not have been fought. Hooker devoted much of his personal
Speaker 1: fortune to fighting for the nationalist cause. It caused that
Speaker 1: he never abandoned. Well there you go. That's good if
Speaker 1: it was for the right people. And that's somebody who
Speaker 1: just claimed to be for the nationalist cause. Apparently that
Speaker 1: money didn't get them too far, because we're still stuck here.
Speaker 1: In his early years, the lordly handsome Hooker. He's kind
Speaker 1: a weird thing about dudes, doesn't He was not only
Speaker 1: a Broadway actor but also an advertising model, appearing in
Speaker 1: advertisements for Chesatfield cigarettes wearing an eyepatch in the famous
Speaker 1: Hathaway shirt advertisements. However, Hooker gave up a promising career
Speaker 1: on the stage after having been offered Henry Fonda's lead
Speaker 1: role in the road tour of the Broadway Hit command decision,
Speaker 1: preferring to work behind the scenes in the entertainment industry.
Speaker 1: So he was rich and he was working in the
Speaker 1: Jewish industry. Hooker ultimately went to a went to work
Speaker 1: as a talent agent for the Music Corporation of America MCA,
Speaker 1: and in the early nineteen fifties was one of the
Speaker 1: highest paid talent agents in America. Yeah. Again, it seems
Speaker 1: like he does quite well for himself when he doesn't
Speaker 1: need the money. It's nice how money attracts money, right,
Speaker 1: So like, if you have money, money is like a
Speaker 1: magnet to other money. His focus was on the burgeoning
Speaker 1: arena of television production. Hooker was particularly found proud of
Speaker 1: like this messing with that word, particularly found of proud,
Speaker 1: fond proud. I guess I could have just kept talking, right.
Speaker 1: Hooker was particularly proud of his efforts to promote black
Speaker 1: entertainment for black audiences, encouraging the artistic endeavors of black
Speaker 1: singers and actors at the same So he was bet
Speaker 1: before b et was ever b et Son.
Speaker 3: All right.
Speaker 1: Hooker thoroughly rejected the concept that black music and black
Speaker 1: culture should be promoted to white audiences. Well that's good,
Speaker 1: a guiding principle of the multicultural music and motion pictures
Speaker 1: promoters of today. Well, I mean you can't. How are
Speaker 1: you going to get the white folk in jail if
Speaker 1: you don't have them have the shit moratls that you've
Speaker 1: incorporated into the black communities. Hooker was particularly enthusiastic about
Speaker 1: the increasing prominence in the mid eighties of Minister Lewis Farrakhan,
Speaker 1: leader of the Nation of Islam at his author and
Speaker 1: this author first met Minister farrakhn while accompanying Hooker to
Speaker 1: a by invitation only rally of the Nation of Islam
Speaker 1: in Washington, DC in nineteen eighty five. For a period,
Speaker 1: one of the MCA contracts under Hooker's domain was that
Speaker 1: of former B movie actor turned television star Ronald Reagan,
Speaker 1: although that detail is left out of Reagan's official biographies.
Speaker 1: In light of Hooker's future infamy as a and reputation
Speaker 1: as an anti Semite, dude, the best thing you could
Speaker 1: be if you're truly a a whatever you want to
Speaker 1: call republican, but if you're an actual nationalist, if you
Speaker 1: believe in the country and the people you and you
Speaker 1: actually love and care about your people, like the way
Speaker 1: Hitler did about is German people, about the Germans, the Ausu,
Speaker 1: the people who are all in related Germanic people, right,
Speaker 1: all of them, if you honestly, since they really cared
Speaker 1: about their state of existence and their and their quality
Speaker 1: of life. Being called an anti semi is like the
Speaker 1: biggest compliment you could get because you'd be like, yeah, motherfuckers,
Speaker 1: get it right. However, a secret description of Hooker's relationship
Speaker 1: with Reagan and rise to Reagan's rise to prominence appears
Speaker 1: in the little known book entitled The Kingmaker, published in
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy two, eight years before Reagan reached the presidency.
Speaker 1: Written by Henry Denker, a well known New York writer, producer,
Speaker 1: and director with wide inside knowledge of the show business industry,
Speaker 1: The Kingmaker was a Roman ahliff that is, a fictional
Speaker 1: novel based on real life characters and events. Thinly disguised,
Speaker 1: everyone knew it was about the behind the scenes story
Speaker 1: of Rond Reagan's political and financial dealings with the MCA
Speaker 1: Agency and how those dealings helped bring Reagan to the
Speaker 1: governorship of California. Read Ronnie, Read Ronnie speaking of Communism.
Speaker 1: The book is not easy to find in the libraries
Speaker 1: or even in secondhand bookstores. That may well be precisely
Speaker 1: because of the fact that if you read between the lines,
Speaker 1: or not even necessarily between the lines, you discover some
Speaker 1: unpleasant things about Ronald Reagan and the people who made
Speaker 1: him into the American political powerhouse of the last quarter
Speaker 1: of the twentieth century. See, this is how you promote
Speaker 1: things when you own all of this printing presses, you
Speaker 1: put in the media, to TV, the da da da
Speaker 1: da da. That's how you make somebody. You could just
Speaker 1: pick anyone out of.
Speaker 16: It.
Speaker 1: Doesn't mean they don't have to have any talent whatsoever.
Speaker 1: The enough proper promotion and putting their face on everything,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden they are stars and people are
Speaker 1: interested in their lives and want to know more about
Speaker 1: them because that's all they've been fed, so that's what
Speaker 1: they want to eat. Hooker was a real life model
Speaker 1: for one of the characters in the book, Carl Brewster,
Speaker 1: a frankly anti Jewish television industry executive, and let it
Speaker 1: be said frankly that West Hooker himself was very anti
Speaker 1: Jewish and made no effort to hide it. Something wrong
Speaker 1: with that I'm trying to figure out. I mean, as
Speaker 1: long as you're not, you know, having them over for
Speaker 1: a cookout and then they become part of the cookout,
Speaker 1: I mean, I will see you what the problem is here.
Speaker 1: You can hate, I mean, you can dislike who you
Speaker 1: want to dislike. Hate was the wrong lord, No one
Speaker 1: gets to tell you what you can like and dislike.
Speaker 1: It's like, hey, by and large, all of your people harm, children, sodomized,
Speaker 1: and it's even part of your religion. You know, guess what,
Speaker 1: I think you're a bunch of fucking scumbacks. I can
Speaker 1: see how that's a pretty valid reflexive feeling about that.
Speaker 1: In The King Maker, Reagan is Jeff Jefferson because he's
Speaker 1: Ronald Reagan. So they made him Jeff Jefferson, right, ron Reagan,
Speaker 1: Jeff Jefferson. It's funny, and he has been former movie
Speaker 1: actor who is catapulted into the California governorship through his
Speaker 1: association with doctor Irwin Kohne, the founder of a mob
Speaker 1: connected booking agency. Hey, they even made his name sound
Speaker 1: Jewish and he's connected to the mob, isn't that perfect
Speaker 1: booking agent? The Talent Corporation of America. So it was
Speaker 1: TCA instead of MCA. Oh funny, which emerges uh a
Speaker 1: political force in its own right. Denker's doctor Cone is
Speaker 1: a real life doctor Jules Stein, and TCA is really
Speaker 1: you guessed that he didn't even have to tell you this.
Speaker 1: The music mc A right better known as the Media
Speaker 1: Giant mc A now I has subsidiary of the over
Speaker 1: growing Brofman Empire. Oh that's nice. MCA is owned by
Speaker 1: the Bronfman's, Seagram's and mc A and probably more stuff.
Speaker 1: Evidently the book was too much on the mark, so
Speaker 1: much so that doctor Stein's real life partner Lee, sorry, Lou,
Speaker 1: doctor Stein's real life partner. Wait, Jules Stein, I guess
Speaker 1: that's a woman? Is that right?
Speaker 3: Wait?
Speaker 5: Hold on?
Speaker 1: Well there was a doctor Irwin Cone who played Jules
Speaker 1: Stein's character. So was it a was it a gender
Speaker 1: like a like A like A a sex reversal too
Speaker 1: or are we to understand that? Lou Lou Wasserman, which
Speaker 1: is interesting the name Wasserman and doctor Stein were two
Speaker 1: gay fags. Who knows described the novel as a piece
Speaker 1: of garbage, even though Wasserman doesn't even characterize in the
Speaker 1: novel at all. Well, that's probably why he had a
Speaker 1: hissy fit, because he wasn't part of it. In nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty six, another writer, Dan Malaid Muldea, known for his
Speaker 1: expertise in the history of organized crime, wrote his own
Speaker 1: book that was no Roman kref but was in fact
Speaker 1: a controversial nonfiction work that told the same story told
Speaker 1: in Denkers The Kingmaker. However, mo Deya's book was more
Speaker 1: explosively and perhaps more accurately titled Dark Victory Around Reagan,
Speaker 1: MCA and the Mob. Knowing about anything about this, I
Speaker 1: didn't know. I read this earlier a couple days ago.
Speaker 1: In any case, Hooker's anti Semitism did not go overwhel
Speaker 1: with his bosses Lou Wasserman and Jules Stein, and ultimately
Speaker 1: Hooker had I got is Jules Stein a dude? Or
Speaker 1: because jewels could be you know, a girl? Or are
Speaker 1: they just too you guys? On gay homosexual? Hooker had
Speaker 1: a parting of the way of Ways with MCAA, only
Speaker 1: to have his mcaa years memorialized in Denker's book. However, Hooker,
Speaker 1: who didn't need the money through his own ingenuity, managed
Speaker 1: to walk away from MCA a very rich man and
Speaker 1: actually was able to outwit Wasserman of MCA, to the
Speaker 1: point that Hooker was later described in print by his
Speaker 1: show business calumnist Walter Winchell. Remember Walter Winschall, will we
Speaker 1: talked about him? He was like the uh Walter Cronkite
Speaker 1: of his time, total piece of shit and jew with
Speaker 1: a very strong pro calmness and German and uh prosion
Speaker 1: that I say Prosianist, pro communists as well, uh tendencies
Speaker 1: and he we talk to you about nationalists all the time.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 1: Walter Winchell as the only one of MCA's employees who
Speaker 1: ever out foxed Wasserman. Because that's what that's what intrigues
Speaker 1: and it is if as long as it's not the
Speaker 1: Jew that you out foxed, that's what that's what they like.
Speaker 1: They like they think that their guide likes when they
Speaker 1: when they trick him. That's what's with the fucking stupid
Speaker 1: string that they string around. It's like they're they're fucking
Speaker 1: out of their minds. But that's the type like if
Speaker 1: you're more treacherous than the Jew, well, congratulations. The Jews
Speaker 1: respect you. They're still gonna kill you, but they respect you.
Speaker 1: In personal conversations, Winchell was known to say more candidly
Speaker 1: that Hooker was the only Gooy to have accomplished that feet,
Speaker 1: although Winchell's additional language was far more guttural in describing
Speaker 1: what Hooker had done to his former employer. Hooker later
Speaker 1: moved toward setting up a fourth television network in the
Speaker 1: mid eighty nineteen fifties.
Speaker 17: Oh he was uh.
Speaker 1: He was the cosby of his day television network in
Speaker 1: the mid fifties, which to the distress of the immediately.
Speaker 1: Much to the distress of immediately, Hooker Kennedy admitted that
Speaker 1: his project was designed to be the first non Jewish
Speaker 1: control of television network. Well maybe it's because of the
Speaker 1: way you advertised it didn't work out. Yeah, could have
Speaker 1: just bend that thing and then like kept quiet about it.
Speaker 1: So it's like, you know, like when you're when you're
Speaker 1: when you're trying to be stealthy and you're trying to
Speaker 1: sneak up on the animals, or if you're in combat
Speaker 1: and like, you know, sir yelling, I'm gonna kill that
Speaker 1: guy over there. See that guy. That guy's the other enemy.
Speaker 1: That's the enemy. I'm gonna shoot him. You don't just
Speaker 1: do you shoot him. You don't have to make yourself now,
Speaker 1: you don't have to announce it to everybody. Hooker later
Speaker 1: moved toward you know, you could have a chance of
Speaker 1: being less successful when you do, although he active solicited
Speaker 1: the financial backing of Ambassador. Ambassador sounds so so prestigious,
Speaker 1: doesn't it. It sounds like you should be putting your
Speaker 1: hand on your chest like a Roman and walking across
Speaker 1: some water or something on. Ambassador Joseph P. Mc kennedy,
Speaker 1: father of the Senator then Senator John F. Kennedy, for
Speaker 1: the project, the founder of the Kennedy dynasty, refused to participate.
Speaker 1: Although he wholeheartedly supported the concepts, Kennedy said that his
Speaker 1: participation would enrage the Jewish community and would endanger his
Speaker 1: son's chances of winning the presidency. Hooker's first hand reminiscence
Speaker 1: of his then secret meeting with Kennedy were told in
Speaker 1: detail for the first time is in this author's work,
Speaker 1: Final Judgment, which I also have. By the way, I
Speaker 1: haven't read it yet, but it came out before this book.
Speaker 1: In any case, the Anti Defamation League ADL of bene Bareth,
Speaker 1: it's the Tension Deficit League, Remember of Benebareth, learned of
Speaker 1: Hooker's effort to organize a fourth network, and in nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty four of the Attention Deficit League devoted a two
Speaker 1: page spread in its bulletin to exposing Hooker under the
Speaker 1: title the Case of the Charming Bigot. I'm just I
Speaker 1: picture things in my mind, so I stopped for a
Speaker 1: second and just kind of the case of the Charming Bigot.
Speaker 1: I'm like, I wonder what that cover would look like.
Speaker 1: The title itself was quite revealing about Hooker's dynamism. Dynamism, Yeah, dynamicism,
Speaker 1: I guess. Even the ADL, so disposed to smearing people
Speaker 1: and casting aspersions on their character, was forced to acknowledge
Speaker 1: that Hooker was possessed of an engaging personality that just
Speaker 1: wouldn't quit. I'm telling you there's some gayness going on
Speaker 1: with mister Piper. He just can't stop talking about dudes. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: New York State Attorney General and later US Senator Jacob Javit,
Speaker 1: it's a corrupt and vicious Jewish ally of the ADL
Speaker 1: issued an injunction preventing Hooker from raising funds for the network,
Speaker 1: thereby killing the project on behalf of the other Zionis
Speaker 1: Run networks. So let's say that again. Let's see New
Speaker 1: York State Attorney General and later Senator Jacob Javits, a
Speaker 1: corrupt and vicious Jewish ally of the ADL. Is there
Speaker 1: any other kind? Is there any other kind? A vicious
Speaker 1: Jewish ally? Is no other kind? Issued an injunction preventing
Speaker 1: Hooker from raising funds for the network, thereby killing the
Speaker 1: project on behalf of the other Zionist run networks. Although
Speaker 1: Hooker then left the United States and went into self
Speaker 1: imposed exile in Italy with all shit tons of money,
Speaker 1: don't feel sad for him. Where he made a fortune
Speaker 1: in the soci see where he made a fortune in
Speaker 1: the soda bottling business, and returned to this country in
Speaker 1: the mid nineteen eighties to resume his political endeavors. I
Speaker 1: don't know. Is Midas more impressive or is it the
Speaker 1: Jewish touch? Because I know this guy wasn't neither. Apparently,
Speaker 1: but I don't think he was Midas. But I'm pretty
Speaker 1: sure he wasn't Jewish. But I don't know. With this
Speaker 1: type of luck, I don't know. For many years, Hooker
Speaker 1: was working quietly behind the scenes in an energetic effort
Speaker 1: to set in place an international petroleum distribution network. Of course,
Speaker 1: I mean, why not in concert with sympathetic interest in
Speaker 1: the Arab world. What would provide funding that would provide
Speaker 1: funding for the American nationalist movement. Well, that's cool. Imagine
Speaker 1: if we had our own ool, that'd be sweet, right,
Speaker 1: I may maybe I'd get I'd be able to do
Speaker 1: this full time. Yeah, we had some something, some kind
Speaker 1: of funding like that we have, we'd all have like,
Speaker 1: you know, our own armbands by now, in our own
Speaker 1: type of like like maybe like a regulation haircut, that'd
Speaker 1: be cool. We should go with the Bullbuster shirt though,
Speaker 1: I think, and I mean already red and black and
Speaker 1: it's kind of like perfect, right. I got the little
Speaker 1: symbol in the sleeve. I'm not wearing it right now,
Speaker 1: but you know what I'm talking about. You've seen that. Unfortunately, however,
Speaker 1: Hooker's efforts were frustrated by figures in a certain Arab
Speaker 1: bridging that had been co opted by Israel's intelligence agency,
Speaker 1: the Masade. You mean there was oil around and the
Speaker 1: Massad and the Jews were around it. I don't believe
Speaker 1: that at all. It sounds like you're saying they're greedy
Speaker 1: or something. In fact, one of the Hookers Burking partners
Speaker 1: in the project was murdered. Yeah, they do that sometimes.
Speaker 1: It's kind of kind of their thing, the whole treachery thing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Hooker himself had you know, cutthroats and bandits, right, the
Speaker 1: hot habrew sagas as they were called Hebrew habrew. It's
Speaker 1: not where you think it came from. Anyway, Hooker himself
Speaker 1: had the benefit of living on the proceeds of a
Speaker 1: trust fund provided to him by his mother, and had
Speaker 1: no desire whatsoever to reap any profit for himself from
Speaker 1: the oil venture, which, if successfully launched, would have, by
Speaker 1: his estimate, provided a minimum of ten million dollars per
Speaker 1: year for the Nationalist cause. What the f and that
Speaker 1: was in the eighties? How much would it have been
Speaker 1: worth now? And how nice would that have been? How
Speaker 1: nice would that have been? Instead? I have to Oh fuck,
Speaker 1: I'll be back now, God damn it?
Speaker 7: All right?
Speaker 1: Where does everybody see me?
Speaker 8: Still?
Speaker 1: All right? Something happened? How come I wasn't going on
Speaker 1: the screen? Oh wow, okay, so you did see I
Speaker 1: got pasitive words? Okay, so you did. I guess see
Speaker 1: it all that's good? Hold on, play it again. Make
Speaker 1: sure it's still going. Nope, it's not still going. What
Speaker 1: the fuck it did?
Speaker 5: End?
Speaker 1: What the fuck is happening? Can you guys hear me? TJ?
Speaker 1: Can you say something? If you do, I can't tell
Speaker 1: if it's I can't tell if it's live or not. Please,
Speaker 1: I just got knocked off. It's this freaking I gotta
Speaker 1: stop using this thing like it's cool that you can
Speaker 1: like load stuff in and just press a button instead
Speaker 1: of having to pull up a share screen every single time.
Speaker 1: And I was on a share screen that must have crashed,
Speaker 1: because that's the reason why the rest of it crashed,
Speaker 1: because I was on a share screen and that it
Speaker 1: I just realized that you guys were seeing my face
Speaker 1: the whole time. You should have been like it shows
Speaker 1: on my screen that I had the share screen up
Speaker 1: so that you were looking at the actual words and
Speaker 1: then went back to it and you weren't. You hadn't,
Speaker 1: so that was weird. Maybe I crashed. Yeah, I crashed
Speaker 1: at the same time. So if you're over on FTJ,
Speaker 1: can you please just tell me if you see me
Speaker 1: or not. I think you can still live, okay, cool man. Sorry,
Speaker 1: Sorry for the interruption, guys, It wasn't intentionally. I do apologize, okay.
Speaker 1: So we got to the ten million part. I think
Speaker 1: I did hear you, guys. I think I did hear
Speaker 1: that part come through on the FTJ and then everything
Speaker 1: might my holding crash. But you know, okay, so ten
Speaker 1: million per year and the only reason why I went
Speaker 1: to check that was to say instead of me having
Speaker 1: to ask you know, you guys, support your local ball
Speaker 1: buster here. And then I was gonna and I was
Speaker 1: gonna off handedly ask you to support your local ballbusser here.
Speaker 1: That's when the whole thing crashed. Talmud obliterator, Talmud obliterator.
Speaker 1: I like the the half half there man, the get
Speaker 1: the the man with this funny with with the shirt mustache,
Speaker 1: and then you have the terminatory vase. Which if they
Speaker 1: made a bunch of them, but they had the mind
Speaker 1: and the compassion and the kindness and and the and
Speaker 1: the morality of that man, I'd be all for them
Speaker 1: to be many, to be mass produced. Yes, that would
Speaker 1: be cool, but they would have to not just look
Speaker 1: like him. They'd have to be like him, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. And they, each one of them that
Speaker 1: was manufactured, would have to care about the people in
Speaker 1: that world that they have that they came out of.
Speaker 1: So if they're in America, they should be American nationalists.
Speaker 1: If they're in Germany, they should be German nationalists, and
Speaker 1: so on and so forth. And if they're you know,
Speaker 1: of goth or Germanic descent, they should be caring about
Speaker 1: all of the long Yeah, thanks, guys, I see it
Speaker 1: all all of the people that are their comrades, brothers
Speaker 1: and sisters. Okay, let's go back to this now, Hooker
Speaker 1: himself on the benefit of living on the proceeds. We
Speaker 1: already said that because he's you know, golden, golden boy.
Speaker 5: Here.
Speaker 1: Sadly, although Hooker was quite physically fit almost until his death,
Speaker 1: hooker sharp mind fell victim to the onset of age
Speaker 1: and his memory began to fail. This was a great
Speaker 1: tragedy for it prevented him from ever putting down the
Speaker 1: complete record of his remarkable career in writing or on video.
Speaker 6: Gee.
Speaker 1: I wonder if that was kind of like planned, Maybe
Speaker 1: something happened to him on purpose. Although until fortunately some
Speaker 1: of his writings have survived. It's like it's almost like
Speaker 1: there's truth to what I said, regardless if it was
Speaker 1: you know, a director or not. Because the stuff that
Speaker 1: they put in our food, water, and they do that
Speaker 1: to us and inject us with so if we're just
Speaker 1: going along with the society, and this is why I said,
Speaker 1: we have to reject every single bit of it, not
Speaker 1: just a portion of it, because the rest of the
Speaker 1: portions will fill in for that one. You know, the
Speaker 1: rest of the system will will will take and occupy
Speaker 1: that space from the from the that which you rejected.
Speaker 1: So you can't just say I reject the medicine, I reject,
Speaker 1: I reject allopath theme to go natural medicine. Well, then
Speaker 1: they're freaking you know, armed people in one agency or another,
Speaker 1: the FDA or some other person will put us do
Speaker 1: what Dershowitz said and plunge it. Hold you down and
Speaker 1: plunge a needle in your arm. I just watched the
Speaker 1: video just recently of what they did to a guy,
Speaker 1: an eighteen year old. They beat the shit out of
Speaker 1: him because he refused it when he was in the
Speaker 1: basic training to get a shot. They and this was
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty and they are twenty twenty one or whatever,
Speaker 1: and they beat the fucking piss out of them. They
Speaker 1: they basically treated him like he was insane. They had
Speaker 1: him in a in a room by himself, and then
Speaker 1: they asked him another you know, to consent to it again.
Speaker 1: And then five guys rushed in and they broke his arm.
Speaker 1: I think, pushed him on the ground, beat him. Look
Speaker 1: say so then I think they forced a shot at him.
Speaker 1: I think I saw a medic forcing a shot at him.
Speaker 1: So that's what they do. That's what they do, and
Speaker 1: that's what they did. And that's America right. Putting the
Speaker 1: Jew poison, the Jew juice in that guy's arm one
Speaker 1: way or the other. You can't.
Speaker 3: You have to.
Speaker 1: You have to reject all of it. You can't take one.
Speaker 1: He's like, well, Okay, that bullshit isn't as detrimental to
Speaker 1: us as this other bullshit. No, the lies are the problem.
Speaker 1: The lies are the problem, the deception and the malicious
Speaker 1: that this is all poison. Everything that we see and
Speaker 1: do and that we're that we have to endure is poison.
Speaker 1: If we wanted to really do something, even though we could,
Speaker 1: we could prove just how fake money is just by
Speaker 1: none of us paying our taxes. That doesn't make the
Speaker 1: world go round. And it's not our it's not our
Speaker 1: business or our duty to do this because it doesn't
Speaker 1: go to where we think it's going anyway. And when
Speaker 1: you want to see how fake the system is and
Speaker 1: how it's just going to fill in because the people
Speaker 1: who print money will just print what they need anyway,
Speaker 1: regardless of our compliance, well then you'll understand what power
Speaker 1: we have, And we do have a power. We have
Speaker 1: the power to fucking reject it all. But if we
Speaker 1: can't be would they say, you can't be grasping at
Speaker 1: the blades of the grass while you're trying to reach
Speaker 1: to the stars, can't be holding onto the earth while
Speaker 1: you're trying to some of some of that type of analogy.
Speaker 1: I don't like it simply because it's like saying, well,
Speaker 1: then you might get carried away, and then you know
Speaker 1: in a sense that you're gonna you're going to abandon
Speaker 1: that which is where you came from. When you're reaching
Speaker 1: for those stars, you're pulling them back down to you.
Speaker 1: That's one thing. If you're going up, up, up, then
Speaker 1: everything else you've left behind. So there's there's there's a
Speaker 1: way of looking at that analogy in a dark way.
Speaker 1: And I've seen you as almost enticing people to do
Speaker 1: the very thing that separates them from God and nature.
Speaker 1: Does that make sense? Or am I just reading into
Speaker 1: that too much? Amazingly, although he suffered for five years
Speaker 1: from the prostate cancer the prostate cancer not just from
Speaker 1: prostate cancer, but the prostate cancer which had spread throughout
Speaker 1: his body and which ultimately killed him, Hooker was quite
Speaker 1: active and just several months before his death appeared at
Speaker 1: a public meeting in Arlington, Virginia where his where this
Speaker 1: author Michael Collins Piper spoke, earning he had he had
Speaker 1: to tell you his name because in case you didn't
Speaker 1: remember from when you bought the book, earning Hooker a
Speaker 1: final attack upon him by his enemies in a published
Speaker 1: report about the meeting by the Southern Popty. Oh, there
Speaker 1: we go, there we go, the Southern Southern Poverty Law
Speaker 1: Center pops in publisher report by his enemies in a
Speaker 1: publisher put about the meeting by the Sociopathic Lunatic Center
Speaker 1: of Morris D's, Hooker frankly was delighted to know that
Speaker 1: his endeavors were still being recorded by his sworn enemies.
Speaker 1: Jesus was no sissy, Hooker would often say. He marched
Speaker 1: right in and threw the money changers out of the temple.
Speaker 1: Hooker was, yeah, Hitler was. Hitler was no sissy either.
Speaker 1: But Jesus was no sissy. Neither was Hitler. In any case,
Speaker 1: Hooker was a remarkable man, indeed, and what he discovered
Speaker 1: during the honestly seriously, like if we want to if
Speaker 1: we believe in this guy, and I'm not saying I do,
Speaker 1: I don't know what to believe when Jews write it. Okay,
Speaker 1: so don't don't get mad at me for that. I
Speaker 1: understand that there's a higher thing and all that stuff,
Speaker 1: but I don't know if I need to get into
Speaker 1: all the details. And I definitely don't need to worship
Speaker 1: man and pretend that that's like worshiping God. I don't
Speaker 1: think there's a necessary I think even this guy says like,
Speaker 1: you know, don't do that, pretty sure, but then they
Speaker 1: made him also say other words, I don't think you
Speaker 1: ever said like, you know, all the way through me
Speaker 1: you get there, and all this other nonsense. That's not
Speaker 1: true unless he himself is a concept and not really
Speaker 1: a person, and it was just done as an allegory,
Speaker 1: because in that case, then you're looking at the more
Speaker 1: of the gnostic thing, where only through your own individual
Speaker 1: experience through life do you obtain the nosis, which basically
Speaker 1: is you're talking to or your your connection with that
Speaker 1: which is trying to instruct you and guide you in
Speaker 1: a proper way. Right, it's not like talking to a thing.
Speaker 1: It's just knowing, knowing very very strongly what truth is
Speaker 1: and what isn't and when things don't resonate with you.
Speaker 1: You know it's not real. You know it's not you know,
Speaker 1: it's a construct of the those who would create a
Speaker 1: false reality for you.
Speaker 16: Ah.
Speaker 1: But yeah, anyhow, if you want to personify another person
Speaker 1: as being very close to I mean, he has anybody
Speaker 1: not seen you open the Last Battle if you haven't,
Speaker 1: please please make sure that you do that. It's everywhere
Speaker 1: and it's on money Tree Publishing dot com. And you
Speaker 1: can use code ball b aa L for ten percent
Speaker 1: off on it too. Get the blu ray. You know,
Speaker 1: the stuff that's on theirnet is a kind of crappy
Speaker 1: quality for a resolution. So you get that, you have
Speaker 1: it forever, and you can share it with people. But
Speaker 1: I and like I said, don't even tell people when
Speaker 1: you do it, Like if you have people over your
Speaker 1: house or whatever. Just put it in and let's just
Speaker 1: play in the background and see what happens. Don't make
Speaker 1: any don't even have to like it. You don't have
Speaker 1: to like introduce it or anything, and just put it in.
Speaker 1: See how I did that. I just did there. You
Speaker 1: don't have to induce yourself or anything. Just put it in.
Speaker 1: In any case, it was remarkable in man INDEEDE and
Speaker 1: what he discovered during the nineteen fifties about the ZIONUS
Speaker 1: effort to control the anti communist movement. Information we are
Speaker 1: now about to detail will be an amazing and eye
Speaker 1: opening and very much sobering revelation for the modern day
Speaker 1: Americans who have never known the real story. What follows
Speaker 1: is the text slightly and annotated for the purposes of clarity.
Speaker 1: Blah blah, blah blah. He's just again shut up and
Speaker 1: just get on with talking about all right, So Joseph
Speaker 1: McCarthy's efforts to investigate communism high places in the American system.
Speaker 1: The AFFIDASA reads. So it's an affidavit from sworn statement
Speaker 1: that Hooker executed on September thirtieth, nineteen fifty four, outlining
Speaker 1: his findings about the role of the self styled American
Speaker 1: Jewish League against Communism. American Jewish League against Communism, it's
Speaker 1: like American Jews against Jews. Right that that that that
Speaker 1: already is the name itself is an inverted it's it's
Speaker 1: what do you call it? It's a contradiction of terms, right,
Speaker 1: it's it's, it's it's self negates. I had an outstanding,
Speaker 1: astounding interview for two hours.
Speaker 12: Now.
Speaker 1: This is his thing, right, because when you see this
Speaker 1: smaller paragraph, it's when he's putting a huge section of something.
Speaker 1: I had an astounding interview with for two hours some
Speaker 1: time ago with Norman L. Marx of the American Jewish
Speaker 1: League against Communism Incorporated. As a matter of fact, I
Speaker 1: was brought along by another party, a mister, and mister
Speaker 1: Marx did not know anything about me. Has he really
Speaker 1: opened up because the person who took me was trusted
Speaker 1: by him. The a j l a C. Or the
Speaker 1: American the American Jewish League against Communism, which again it
Speaker 1: looks like now now when you try to type that
Speaker 1: end in case, I've given you results for athletic the
Speaker 1: insurance with the duck. Remember remember Gilbert Gottfried before he
Speaker 1: got fired from it a flak Yeah that guy, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I didn't do it very good. The ad the aj
Speaker 1: L a C has offices at blah blah blah who
Speaker 1: cares uh in New York City. It's national chairman as
Speaker 1: Alfred Kolberg, its executive director is Rabbi Benjamin Schultz, and
Speaker 1: its treasurer is now is Harry Pasternak. Listed on the
Speaker 1: national board or the following book blah blah blah. Who
Speaker 1: cares I swear under oath? Uh blah. Mister Marks listed
Speaker 1: above uh and on the letterhead of the a j
Speaker 1: L a C as a member of the national board,
Speaker 1: said far in away, the principal financial contributor to the
Speaker 1: a j ALC is mister Bernard Baruch. That hurt my
Speaker 1: ears when I did that. When questioned on this point
Speaker 1: as to what percentage, she would say, mister, you guys
Speaker 1: know who Bernard Baruch is, right, speaking of king makers,
Speaker 1: this guy was the uh, the brain of of Woodrow Wilson.
Speaker 1: He was there. He was around for FDR. He was
Speaker 1: around for freaking Truman. He might have been still alive
Speaker 1: when Eisenhearer took office, but he was always in politics.
Speaker 1: His father was a doctor. Oh, and he's big hardcore
Speaker 1: rothschild agent slash Zionist psychopath. Right, okay, And he was
Speaker 1: on the war industry's board in World War one two
Speaker 1: I think it was on World War two. I don't
Speaker 1: know if maybe somebody else was in there. But during
Speaker 1: the era of a lot of infiltration by these fucking scumbags, right,
Speaker 1: we had a bunch of Francists you too, and not
Speaker 1: just people that claimed to be Jewish, and I'm calling Francis. No,
Speaker 1: I'm talking to people who identified as Francists were in
Speaker 1: this country and they were most certainly Rothschild's agents, and
Speaker 1: so are their parents. And they came here and rode
Speaker 1: across country on their little buggies and this. You know, however,
Speaker 1: you want to picture that in your head with other
Speaker 1: Rothschild's Asians. I'm talking about brand Eyes. And I saw
Speaker 1: something on YouTube when I was looking this up, and
Speaker 1: it was about Lewis Brandeis and they were talking. It was,
Speaker 1: you know, Jewish lady talking to another guy and all
Speaker 1: I DeVault, Oh god, you know she was saying all
Speaker 1: about the Frankists and like a very religious, family oriented
Speaker 1: sect of Jews. They're they're very tight knit, yes, because
Speaker 1: they fuck each other. You sick psychoconapaia. Only a fucking
Speaker 1: Jew would say that about that. It's like not a
Speaker 1: blight on your reputation and your religion.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: She didn't say that. She said that they have very
Speaker 1: strong family ties because they passed their children around to
Speaker 1: the group. They have ancestral relationships with their own children.
Speaker 1: This is what Frankism is about. This is the everything
Speaker 1: that you think of a Satanic cult is what the
Speaker 1: Francis personify. You want to look at the deepest, darkest
Speaker 1: parts of the Talmud, even though they call themselves for
Speaker 1: for you know, again for the public image, because they
Speaker 1: were going to be converted into Catholicism and the frank
Speaker 1: and nobody knew what the frank Is really involved with,
Speaker 1: obviously because otherwise they wouldn't have been baptized. But they
Speaker 1: had this this fake anti Talmudists, you know, slant to
Speaker 1: them where they burned the Talmud much to dismay of
Speaker 1: the Rabbinical rule, because they didn't he the only thing
Speaker 1: that was going on there was a power struggle between
Speaker 1: Frank and the the Sanhedrin type, the cohol type, the
Speaker 1: rabbinical type, and he's just basically saying, fuck you, I'm
Speaker 1: the Messiah, bitch. There wasn't It wasn't about, you know,
Speaker 1: rejecting the precepts and all this garbage that was in
Speaker 1: the Talbmut, because they they did a lot of that stuff.
Speaker 1: They didn't have any moral qualms they got they let
Speaker 1: them all loose. The only thing they didn't follow were
Speaker 1: any of the retarded rules that they had in there. Mister, Like, like,
Speaker 1: who do you would you listen to somebody who allows
Speaker 1: you to you know, and and makes it okay for
Speaker 1: you to like, you know, plunder and pillage and just
Speaker 1: and rape children, but makes you get in, you know,
Speaker 1: tuck in the corners and you know, make sure that
Speaker 1: you have only one cabinet door open when you're cooking, Like,
Speaker 1: would you listen to somebody to tell you who tells
Speaker 1: you to do that when they're you know, if they're
Speaker 1: telling you that you can do this other thing, that
Speaker 1: they're doing it too, Like what at one point do
Speaker 1: you say, fuck you in your rules and fuck you
Speaker 1: and your sick other aspects because it's all nuts, Like
Speaker 1: why would you feel like you would need to adhere
Speaker 1: to doing this when they're letting you go crazy in
Speaker 1: some other aspect?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: He anal retentive about this thing, but let your hair
Speaker 1: down on this one. Right, as long as you're harming
Speaker 1: someone else, I guess it's okay no matter what you do.
Speaker 1: Mister Marx listened above the letter head blah blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: far and away the principal you know, okay, said that
Speaker 1: the question on this point, what percentage? She said, mister
Speaker 1: Brooke contributed. He answered, eighty five to ninety percent of
Speaker 1: the funds. Hey, well, that's funny that eighty five to
Speaker 1: ninety percent of the Bolsheviks were Jews. I said that
Speaker 1: I had thought mister Kolberg was the main contributor of
Speaker 1: the AJLAC, and mister Marx answered, well, he contributes some,
Speaker 1: but nothing like what Baruch contributes. I asked mister Marx
Speaker 1: why Baruk's name did not appear in the letterhead. He
Speaker 1: stated that Baruke was a very empathetic, empathic, emphatic. Sorry,
Speaker 1: Brooke was very emphatic about not having his name appere
Speaker 1: on the letterhead. I think we may have gone over
Speaker 1: some of this before. Maybe No, I don't know. I
Speaker 1: had dayjaving moment for a second. Mister Marx said that
Speaker 1: the organization was entirely Jewish, but that a funny thing
Speaker 1: was that many of the founders of this it seemed
Speaker 1: to have been have Christian Wise. We did talk about this.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to move ahead now, good good and
Speaker 1: get good. I get to get to the part that
Speaker 1: I wanted to get to, the sweet okay and look important.
Speaker 1: So we're going to get into so we have the
Speaker 1: West Hooker to thank for having spotted early on that
Speaker 1: there was much more to the rise of band of
Speaker 1: Communism in America, at least in the form approved by
Speaker 1: the Zionists and Protsky elements. It is vital that Hooker's
Speaker 1: revelations he fully understood today. What adds an amazing further
Speaker 1: credibility to Hooker's shocking revelations about the manipulation of Senator
Speaker 1: McCarthy is the point made by famed organized crime writer
Speaker 1: Hank Messik in the book John Ggar Hoover. So basically
Speaker 1: what he goes on to say is that Jaggar Hoover
Speaker 1: was not you know, I'm sorry, not Jayeagar Hoover.
Speaker 5: But.
Speaker 1: There might have been. They were utilizing what what uh
Speaker 1: McCarthy was doing to their benefit, and he wasn't going
Speaker 1: after the bigger fish, and and that was by manipulation, right.
Speaker 1: But it wasn't that he was wrong or that he
Speaker 1: was lying, or that there wasn't a problem. It was
Speaker 1: just that it was good. It was controlled burn right.
Speaker 1: And then when he got a Senate seat, he did
Speaker 1: actually go after those whom he wasn't supposed to, and
Speaker 1: that's when they took him out. So it wasn't that
Speaker 1: there was anything going on wrong with McCarthy, just just
Speaker 1: to just to speed this up a little bit. We
Speaker 1: don't think