Speaker 1: Ross and I were just kind of talking off the air.
Speaker 1: We don't really believe it or not. Ross and I
Speaker 1: don't text each other while these things are going on,
Speaker 1: mostly because there's a good probability one of us ain't
Speaker 1: watching it while it's live, because you know, we get
Speaker 1: up in the morning and watch it. So we hit
Speaker 1: each other with our fresh takes this morning before the show,
Speaker 1: just really the overall how did you think it goes?
Speaker 1: What are your top one or two takeaways? And I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what mine are before we get into this one.
Speaker 1: Kamala was less circular speaking, more practiced than I think
Speaker 1: people probably thought she was going to be. And why
Speaker 1: wouldn't you think that with the most recent stuff that
Speaker 1: you've seen of her trying to form coherent sentences in
Speaker 1: these situations.
Speaker 2: Where it's just it comes across as weird.
Speaker 3: Man.
Speaker 1: But I remembered, you know, how how she was on
Speaker 1: the debate stage against Biden, obviously when she was throwing
Speaker 1: him under the bus as a racist, and it was
Speaker 1: more coherent than a lot of the clips that we
Speaker 1: have played of Harris over the last few weeks.
Speaker 2: And I think you.
Speaker 1: Got that more that version, not to the extent that
Speaker 1: it was I think you got more of that version.
Speaker 1: And Trump came in there and you could tell they
Speaker 1: had one or two things that they were getting ready,
Speaker 1: you know, as as gotcha lines. There's a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of them in the audio we're going to play. There's
Speaker 1: one where Trump did the hey, I'm talking thing, and
Speaker 1: we'll play that for you, which.
Speaker 2: Obviously was was her line.
Speaker 1: So the best way I could sum it up is
Speaker 1: Kamala came across as well, let's see you know what
Speaker 1: you know, let's just we don't. Let's not beat around
Speaker 1: the bush, depending on who you like. Kamala came across
Speaker 1: as a B and Trump came across as a D.
Speaker 2: Is that fair?
Speaker 1: And the thing is, strategically, you have people on both
Speaker 1: sides that would tell that person, be it Kamala or Trump,
Speaker 1: you need to or you shouldn't come across as that.
Speaker 1: And so I don't know what to think. I don't
Speaker 1: know that did we sway people yesterday?
Speaker 4: Well?
Speaker 1: No, probably not when you're both dug in to because
Speaker 1: your side has a thirst for blood. I don't know
Speaker 1: how that lands in the middle. I know that sounds waffling,
Speaker 1: but it's not. I mean, it's just there's nothing I
Speaker 1: can point to definitively that I think would have moved
Speaker 1: a large group of people, except people who might be
Speaker 1: getting a fresh taste of well, a fresh taste of Kamala, right,
Speaker 1: because there's not a lot out there, and maybe some
Speaker 1: who don't remember that. That's kind of how Trump operated.
Speaker 1: He accused the dude's dad of helping to kill a
Speaker 1: former resident. What did you think you were gonna get?
Speaker 1: And we you know, that's where we started, That's where
Speaker 1: we went from there. That will never be, that will
Speaker 1: never not be distracting. What you know, roskin color code.
Speaker 1: My audio cuts and all of Trump's are always orange.
Speaker 1: And we've settled. Is that a Is that like a
Speaker 1: pastel that we've settled on for Kamala?
Speaker 2: Because it's not a blue, it's not quite a purple.
Speaker 1: It's sure that I'd say it's like lavender.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, it's one of those girl colors. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: that's one of the colors.
Speaker 5: She wears a lot. When you pay attention, she wears
Speaker 5: that color.
Speaker 1: I don't really check her out, but I'll trust you. Yeah,
Speaker 1: now that I think about it, I think I have
Speaker 1: seen a rock in the lavender. Okay, look, yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: all right, so she's lavender, Trump's orange, and we got
Speaker 1: a bunch of sound to get to you watch it.
Speaker 1: I'm assuming this morning obviously when you're dubbing everything in.
Speaker 5: I went to Better on nine o'clock. Well, couple of
Speaker 5: three came in, watched the debate, loaded the audio. The beginning,
Speaker 5: If anything, she was sort of like she was smacking
Speaker 5: her lips a lot. I think she really needed like
Speaker 5: some water in the beginning, and like like her voice
Speaker 5: that you were mentioning was sort of like sing songy
Speaker 5: and up and down. And but I don't think what
Speaker 5: happened last night moved the needle in either direction. Okay,
Speaker 5: like we said yesterday, like was was someone going to
Speaker 5: pull a Biden? I don't think anyone pulled a Biden.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, I no, there's that not a question. Nobody.
Speaker 2: Nobody pulled a Biden.
Speaker 4: Uh and uh.
Speaker 1: Following the following the debate, uh, Kamalas said that she
Speaker 1: wanted another one Trump. I don't know that Trump said
Speaker 1: yes or no yet. I hadn't seen anything this morning,
Speaker 1: so I don't know. Maybe they do it again, maybe
Speaker 1: they don't.
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 5: If ABC is going to do another debate, like.
Speaker 2: Why, like why why why would you think they never
Speaker 2: do it?
Speaker 5: I don't know, see, like and many people are pointing
Speaker 5: this out right, it seems almost like three v one's
Speaker 5: that's what it seem mean.
Speaker 2: But I had a team came in your piece.
Speaker 5: Yeah, like it was like Candy Crowley and steroids. That
Speaker 5: being said, Trump probably should have been prepared for that, right.
Speaker 1: I think it's it should have been a possi stability
Speaker 1: that was raised in the pregame meeting. Yeah, I would agree, you.
Speaker 2: Know what, it remind them.
Speaker 5: This is my main thought on it. And and okay,
Speaker 5: so I don't I think that's going to backfire on
Speaker 5: ABC and on the press. I think when you put
Speaker 5: them side by side and you see Kamala's eye rolling
Speaker 5: and they're laughing at she's smiling at people Canno that
Speaker 5: can't afford groceries, or she's smiling at the thirteen soldiers
Speaker 5: that lost their lives in Afghanistan, it looks very it
Speaker 5: was very odd and very very strange. But the moderators
Speaker 5: usually it's subtle. Yeah, this was so over the top,
Speaker 5: like they were protecting her. And once again Trump should
Speaker 5: have been prepared for that, but it's so obvious. I
Speaker 5: think that's going to backfire in people because it's so blatant.
Speaker 5: It reminded me of and you're gonna laugh or be pissed.
Speaker 5: But it reminded me of there's this classic wrestling match
Speaker 5: now hear me out between between hul Cogan and Shawn Michaels.
Speaker 2: Everything can be.
Speaker 5: Seinfeld okay, And in this classic match, Shawn Michaels is
Speaker 5: known he over sells the entire match. And if you
Speaker 5: don't know what over selling is, I'm shocked, sho no,
Speaker 5: but it's classic because he was pissed off at Hogan.
Speaker 5: And if so, what over selling is If someone punches
Speaker 5: you right, you're supposed to be like, oh, it's punched.
Speaker 5: Imagine like you get punched, but the wrestler who gets
Speaker 5: punched us like three backflips over the rope out of
Speaker 5: the ring, Like it's so obvious that he's he's over
Speaker 5: selling getting punched right, because then and then at that
Speaker 5: point it becomes so obvious what's going on that it
Speaker 5: takes away. So they were so blatant and obvious about
Speaker 5: this that I think the common person sitting at home
Speaker 5: watching this is going to be like, what the hell's
Speaker 5: going on?
Speaker 2: This isn't right, and I think it's going to backfire
Speaker 2: on him. I really do. I I mean, what is
Speaker 2: the average person. Let me tell you, Let me tell you.
Speaker 5: Let me refray the independence. I think independence sitting at
Speaker 5: home are going to be like, this is that's over
Speaker 5: the top. This is obvious what they're doing, and I
Speaker 5: just can't buy it anymore.
Speaker 1: All right, So I'm sitting there. This is how I
Speaker 1: got to watch the debate last night. So we had
Speaker 1: our listener event at chop House that was went great.
Speaker 1: Met a lot of really nice folks, folks from all over,
Speaker 1: and we drank we had we'd sampled bourbon, we were
Speaker 1: tasting some of the food. Chop House was nice enough
Speaker 1: to host us, who've done a lot of events there.
Speaker 2: Obviously they got great food.
Speaker 1: Although ross I got up and they had just served
Speaker 1: this crab dip, which is like crack that they sell
Speaker 1: there for everyone to have. And that's when I welcome
Speaker 1: people in. I say, hey, what do you think of
Speaker 1: the crab dip. They're like, oh, this is amazing, it's great,
Speaker 1: and I said, well, we want to create a unique experience.
Speaker 1: So actually those are hand harvested ducks from high Point
Speaker 1: Lake just about three o'clock this afternoon. And everyone laughs,
Speaker 1: and then I look over the one restaurant person's not laughing,
Speaker 1: so I hope I didn't irritate them, but that was
Speaker 1: the good part of my interactions with folks. I then
Speaker 1: go back to my hotel because I'm you know, I'm
Speaker 1: doing I'm in Greensboro this week, and I walk into
Speaker 1: the lobby and they it is right at debate start time, basically,
Speaker 1: so I sit down because I'm hosting the thing, I
Speaker 1: don't get to eat, like a full meal and all that.
Speaker 1: So I sit down in the lobby at the bar
Speaker 1: thing that they have there and I order. I ordered
Speaker 1: like the meatballs or whatever, and I'm sitting there. Debate
Speaker 1: comes on. Initially, the woman working won't turn it on
Speaker 1: on the TV in the bar, and it's just like,
Speaker 1: we don't run it's sports only in here. If you
Speaker 1: guys want to watch it, watch over, which I kind
Speaker 1: of get right because everyone wants to stab each other, but.
Speaker 2: It's just me.
Speaker 1: And this woman walks up and she sits there's only
Speaker 1: like four bar seating places. She sits like two down
Speaker 1: from me.
Speaker 6: And I don't look.
Speaker 2: I don't think anything of it.
Speaker 1: I don't even take into I don't even take into
Speaker 1: account that she has strolled in here other than to
Speaker 1: notice there's another person.
Speaker 2: And I hear her ask the lady.
Speaker 1: When she hands her a menu. Can we turn the
Speaker 1: debate on? Well, now I want to look to see
Speaker 1: who I'm dealing with. And I look over there, and
Speaker 1: I had I had. I had a suspicion. Okay, I
Speaker 1: had a suspicion based on stereotypes that are out there.
Speaker 2: We all do it.
Speaker 1: We don't necessarily need to vocalize it. But I was
Speaker 1: very quickly proven one hundred percent accurate. And at first
Speaker 1: she was very pleasant. I could I said, hey, I
Speaker 1: want to watch it too, and I did that to
Speaker 1: indicate to the to the ladies serving us, that it's
Speaker 1: okay and I and this is why I threw down.
Speaker 1: I said, if anyone else comes down here, feel free
Speaker 1: to turn it off. And the woman goes, yeah, that's great,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, Okay. The debate starts and she is squealing.
Speaker 1: She is squealing with delight.
Speaker 4: Comes to the economy.
Speaker 7: Do you believe Americans are better off than they were
Speaker 7: four years ago.
Speaker 8: So I was raised as a middle class kid, and
Speaker 8: I am actually the only person on this stage who
Speaker 8: has a plan that is about lifting up the middle class.
Speaker 1: This woman under her breath goes me too, me too
Speaker 1: about okay, and so she I'm like, all right, she
Speaker 1: would direct your comfort, but I don't care, right, I'm
Speaker 1: not going to sit here and get into anything or
Speaker 1: start anything. And do you haven't been implied to me.
Speaker 1: I haven't been implied to you. We're just two people
Speaker 1: watching this, and if you want to root for your team,
Speaker 1: no problem. I'm a little quieter around this stuff. So
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm just there. I'm existing.
Speaker 2: But I start to notice things, the singleness, the.
Speaker 1: Weird stuff that she was saying there, And I thought, okay,
Speaker 1: when I say singleness, I mean she's like in her
Speaker 1: own zone, right And and okay, all right, and we're
Speaker 1: still watching.
Speaker 8: Working people of America. I believe in the ambition, the aspirations,
Speaker 8: the dreams of the American people. And that is why
Speaker 8: I imagine and have actually a plan to build what
Speaker 8: I call an opportunity economy. Because here's the thing. We
Speaker 8: know that we have a shortage of homes and housing
Speaker 8: and the cost of housing is too expensive, far too
Speaker 8: many people. We know that young families need support to
Speaker 8: raise their children, and I intend on extending a tax
Speaker 8: cut for those families of six thousand dollars, which is
Speaker 8: the largest child tax credit that we have given in
Speaker 8: a long time, so that those young families can afford
Speaker 8: to buy a crib, buy a car seat, buy clothes
Speaker 8: for their children.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, look and then that's And at that
Speaker 1: point I'm like, she obviously thinks that that's great.
Speaker 4: What was set?
Speaker 2: I don't say anything.
Speaker 1: And then right before Trump starts speaking, she goes, yeah,
Speaker 1: she's for us and not for the billion and says
Speaker 1: this to me, And I'm like, you have crossed a line.
Speaker 2: I'm not talking to you. Don't talk to me.
Speaker 1: Or don't lecture me if you don't want to get
Speaker 1: into a And it's clear by my body language and
Speaker 1: the fact that I have an engaged post getting this
Speaker 1: thing on, I don't want to get into it.
Speaker 2: And then this happened.
Speaker 8: That's Economists in our country, if not the world, have
Speaker 8: reviewed our relative plans for the future of America. What
Speaker 8: Goldman Sachs has said is that Donald Trump's plan would
Speaker 8: make the economy worse, mine would strengthen the economy. What
Speaker 8: the Wharton School has said is Donald Trump's plan would
Speaker 8: actually explode the deficit.
Speaker 1: And she goes, she goes, see she's got the experts.
Speaker 1: And I turned to her and I said, he went
Speaker 1: to Wharton. I didn't say anything else. I said, he
Speaker 1: went to Wharton. That is all that I said.
Speaker 8: Sixteen Nobel laureates have described his economic plan as something
Speaker 8: that would increase inflation and by the middle of next year,
Speaker 8: would invite a recession. You just have to look at
Speaker 8: where we are and where we stand on the issues.
Speaker 8: I'd invite you.
Speaker 1: And then right there, I said invited recession. I thought
Speaker 1: we were in one.
Speaker 8: Now that Donald Trump actually has no plan for you,
Speaker 8: because he is more interested in defending himself than he
Speaker 8: is in looking out for you.
Speaker 1: Well, and I said, well, he is charged with everything.
Speaker 1: And now I'm talking to the way I'm not talking
Speaker 1: to this woman. And she at that point is Daggers.
Speaker 1: Absolute Daggers.
Speaker 4: I went to the Wharton School to find it, Shiga Faz.
Speaker 4: Many of those professors, the top professors, think my plan
Speaker 4: is a brilliant plan. It's a great plan. It's a
Speaker 4: plan that's going to bring up our worth, our value
Speaker 4: as a country. It's going to make people want to
Speaker 4: be able to go and work and create jobs and
Speaker 4: create a lot of good, solid money for our country.
Speaker 4: And just to finish off, she doesn't have a plan.
Speaker 4: She copied Biden's plan, and it's like four sentences like run,
Speaker 4: spot run.
Speaker 2: And so the next thing that happens.
Speaker 1: And I don't want to get anyone in trouble because
Speaker 1: this is my interpretation at the time.
Speaker 2: The woman who is one.
Speaker 1: Of the workers there, who's kind, she's doing her own thing,
Speaker 1: but she's obviously listening to this. She's nodding her head
Speaker 1: while Trump is talking. And this woman is sitting there
Speaker 1: next to us, is what is clearly seeing this. I
Speaker 1: don't say anything again, I don't even I don't want
Speaker 1: to engage. And you're welcome to sit there and you
Speaker 1: can cheer and whistle and do whatever you want. I
Speaker 1: got headphones, it'll be fine. And then this line.
Speaker 4: Hits policies like they have. I don't say her because
Speaker 4: she has no policy. Everything that she believed three years
Speaker 4: ago and four years ago is out the window. She's
Speaker 4: going to my philosophy now. In fact, I was going
Speaker 4: to send her a maga hat she's gone to my philosophy.
Speaker 1: But I laugh out loud. I'm sorry, I laughed out loud.
Speaker 1: And then I hear and you have to understand, we're like,
Speaker 1: what five minutes into debate at that time, you know,
Speaker 1: not counting the setup and everything right, just a few
Speaker 1: minutes into this, I hear, can I get a check?
Speaker 2: And she pays and.
Speaker 1: Leaves And it was better than any dessert or anything
Speaker 1: that I could have ordered.
Speaker 2: And I didn't have to do anything. So I was
Speaker 2: so I tweeted some of this out last night. So
Speaker 2: that was my fun. That was my watching experience, and
Speaker 2: we got a whole bunch more to get to.
Speaker 1: We got a few other stories as well. We got
Speaker 1: to talk about this morning phone number eight eight eight
Speaker 1: nine three four seven eight seven four. If you want
Speaker 1: to opine on what you saw there yesterday, We're happy
Speaker 1: to have those conversations. Do you think Trump could have
Speaker 1: done more? Do you think everyone had the right tone?
Speaker 1: Do you think some of the lines landed either for
Speaker 1: him or for her? And should they do another debate?
Speaker 1: If if they're all gonna look like as Ross pointed out,
Speaker 1: they're gonna look like ABC is doing a three on one.
Speaker 1: I you know, maybe maybe if for Trump, you don't
Speaker 1: do it and you just take the you take the flack. Anyway,
Speaker 1: We'll be back hang on. One of the one of
Speaker 1: the people who was watching that little bit of the
Speaker 1: debate down there, told me a little about themselves, and
Speaker 1: they are they are. This is the first time they
Speaker 1: can vote because they're not from here. They moved here legally,
Speaker 1: I would point out, came through and they have they
Speaker 1: have now a chief citizenship and the ability to go
Speaker 1: ahead and cast a vote.
Speaker 2: And so she was very excited. It's her first chance
Speaker 2: to vote.
Speaker 1: And I'm not going to tell you where she came from,
Speaker 1: but you don't want to live there ever, not not
Speaker 1: among us, I guess the you know, the the general
Speaker 1: population because of the absolute overt corruption and danger that
Speaker 1: individuals face in this country.
Speaker 2: She was from and she could not have hated Kamala Moore.
Speaker 1: And I want you to understand that she is you
Speaker 1: would identify her as black if you saw her. I mean,
Speaker 1: she is black, but she's not, you know, raised in
Speaker 1: America black. And she she gets really she said that
Speaker 1: she gets really offended by this expectation. And I just
Speaker 1: thought That was an interesting perspective because you know, we
Speaker 1: you know, we have we have black listeners who obviously
Speaker 1: push back against what would be the normal flow of expectations. Right,
Speaker 1: don't step off the democratic plantation is the line that
Speaker 1: they use, And it was interesting to see how offended
Speaker 1: she was.
Speaker 2: At that concept.
Speaker 1: So I'm telling you talk to people, and I didn't.
Speaker 1: I didn't lead her, tell her anything.
Speaker 2: I didn't. Maybe I didn't tell her anything about me.
Speaker 2: I just listened.
Speaker 1: So my point being that is, you can handicap these
Speaker 1: things to the extent that you can handicap these things.
Speaker 1: But like that's a perspective I don't I wasn't really
Speaker 1: calculating in there. And there's probably not enough of her
Speaker 1: to necessarily move the needle in some states, but maybe
Speaker 1: there is. But having that, I don't know that layer
Speaker 1: of perspective there, and I don't know everything going on
Speaker 1: in her life. But like the stuff the big promises
Speaker 1: and and and those types of things, and then what
Speaker 1: is witnessed where it looks like a prosecution of one's
Speaker 1: political opponents weighs weighed heavily in her mind based on
Speaker 1: what she was telling me. So you know, that's that's
Speaker 1: why we do these things. That's why we go out
Speaker 1: and we have these events and we listen to folks
Speaker 1: scream at each other on a stage and crack jokes
Speaker 1: and people read body language, and you know, it's it's
Speaker 1: it's like a divining rod. And sometimes when they get
Speaker 1: it right, and sometimes they don't. The biggest I think
Speaker 1: one of the biggest things that the Harris campaign may
Speaker 1: run into a problem with is they can't appear to
Speaker 1: appear like Hillary did, with a smug level of self confidence,
Speaker 1: like I don't even know why I'm talking to this peasant.
Speaker 1: And I think they have to be I think they
Speaker 1: have to be very careful that that doesn't come across,
Speaker 1: because I think people picked up and read that last
Speaker 1: time more obviously than people thought they were going to.
Speaker 1: You looked at you looked at all the post mortem
Speaker 1: on the on the Hillary campaign. Almost every single thing
Speaker 1: where it seemingly cost her a lot of votes or
Speaker 1: the very least uh caught, you know, cause people to
Speaker 1: not show up with the polls seemed to be perceived arrogance.
Speaker 1: And so the question is, when you look at that
Speaker 1: debate last night, did either of the two candidates seem
Speaker 1: arrogant and because people are sick of arrogant and entitled,
Speaker 1: and frankly, I think they're sick of it across the board.
Speaker 1: They just have a different perception about how one appears
Speaker 1: to be entitled. You know, it could be you know,
Speaker 1: Hillary not even bothering to go to Michigan or Wisconsin
Speaker 1: because who the hell cares. Or it could be Donald
Speaker 1: Trump simply being a billionaire that people attach that too.
Speaker 1: So that's why we have these conversations. All right, let's
Speaker 1: go ahead and get back into it. And you know,
Speaker 1: Trump out there at the very beginning trying to define
Speaker 1: his opponent classic strategy within a debate.
Speaker 2: Obviously, Kamala was doing it as well.
Speaker 4: As a Marxist. Everybody knows she's a Marxist. Her father's
Speaker 4: a Marxist professor in economics and he taught her well.
Speaker 4: But when you look at what she's done to our country,
Speaker 4: and when you look at these millions and millions of
Speaker 4: people that are pouring into our country monthly, where it's
Speaker 4: I believe twenty one million people, not the fifteen that
Speaker 4: people say, and I think it's a lot higher than
Speaker 4: the twenty one. That's bigger than New York State.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, And frankly, this is this is one
Speaker 1: of the things that Trump can get on, but he
Speaker 1: needs to get into how it impacts the economy, which
Speaker 1: is an easy story to tell because people see it.
Speaker 1: It's an easy story to tell. They're looking at what's
Speaker 1: going on up in New York where you have you
Speaker 1: have Midtown Manhattan hotels which I don't know you ever
Speaker 1: stayed in a hotel off Times Square? You ever you
Speaker 1: ever gone up done the New York thing and and
Speaker 1: shelled out the dollars necessary to stay like the W
Speaker 1: or one of the hotels there in Times Square, which
Speaker 1: are considered you know, not the not the the five star,
Speaker 1: but also not a flea bag, but but middle of
Speaker 1: the road to maybe a little nicer. The W is
Speaker 1: actually pretty nice. It's like it's a mortgage payment.
Speaker 2: And and and.
Speaker 1: People in New York or people live outside of New
Speaker 1: York themselves, like outside of the city, like who can't
Speaker 1: afford to live in Manhattan would trip over themselves to
Speaker 1: be able to live in Midtown Manhattan.
Speaker 2: That'd be crazy.
Speaker 1: And you got one hundred and forty thousand migrants that
Speaker 1: are now in New York, which by the way I
Speaker 1: saw a stat they have they can apply for a
Speaker 1: work permit. I don't know if you know this stity
Speaker 1: of New York and the City of New York, they
Speaker 1: can go ahead and do that. With this secondary number,
Speaker 1: do you know the percentage of the one hundred and
Speaker 1: forty thousand migrants that have even applied for a work
Speaker 1: permit so that they have the ability to work? In
Speaker 1: your head, formulate what do you think the percentage of
Speaker 1: those one hundred and forty thousand people who were sent
Speaker 1: for a you know, to seize the American dream. And
Speaker 1: there's no problems. You're not allowed to question any of this,
Speaker 1: even though there's motor Venezuelan motorcycle gangs committing robberies there.
Speaker 1: The percentage is two percent. Dose out of one hundred
Speaker 1: forty thousand, two percent have applied for a work permit
Speaker 1: to continue to move forward and hopefully find some stable
Speaker 1: footing that will allow them to make a more compelling case,
Speaker 1: you know, twenty years down the road or whenever they
Speaker 1: actually get in front of an immigration judge. That's where
Speaker 1: we are here. People resent that, and it's okay to
Speaker 1: address it, especially as you attach it to the economy
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you what I think winning strategies are
Speaker 1: some of it.
Speaker 2: I know some of you think I don't want to.
Speaker 1: Punch enough on stuff like this, but I think that
Speaker 1: the way you punch is you make people think about
Speaker 1: what they see around them, and you.
Speaker 2: Let them do it themselves. Ask yourself, what's going on here?
Speaker 1: Are our services that you expect within your community? Are
Speaker 1: they as readily available? And then if they're not, you
Speaker 1: have to come to terms with whether you think that's
Speaker 1: a good thing or a bad thing, or a thing
Speaker 1: that could be done better.
Speaker 2: It's it's really simple.
Speaker 4: People can't go out of buy cereal or bacon or
Speaker 4: eggs or anything else. These the people of our cunt.
Speaker 1: She is shaking her head during this. I was wonder
Speaker 1: this is something Ross mentioned earlier. Yes, she's ship in
Speaker 1: her head.
Speaker 5: And laughing and rolling and what are you doing?
Speaker 2: This is not the one to do it. This is
Speaker 2: the one to go.
Speaker 1: Yes, you know, but here's how we're bringing it down.
Speaker 1: They just got to report out literally yesterday before the
Speaker 1: debate said for the first time, grocery prices are not
Speaker 1: just failing to continue to go up their cut, they're
Speaker 1: coming down. I don't know that I believe it, but
Speaker 1: she should be armed with that, not laughing at it.
Speaker 1: Like Ross broke his leg. He comes and he's like, man,
Speaker 1: I broke my leg and.
Speaker 2: I'm just laughing at him. Well, I'm listening to him
Speaker 2: talk about.
Speaker 5: It, right, and I have had a lot of pain here.
Speaker 4: It could barely walk.
Speaker 2: So crazy.
Speaker 4: No, I'm telling you.
Speaker 1: Get out of here faster, lunatic. Oh you and you're stupid.
Speaker 1: What is that a chair with wheel?
Speaker 4: What is that? Lazy?
Speaker 1: Right, it's just don't do it, like if your people
Speaker 1: don't do that, become a statue, play the freeze game
Speaker 1: he played as a kid, and then when he's done talking,
Speaker 1: go yes, there have been struggles. It's and here's why
Speaker 1: the problem is is that if they acquiesce as they
Speaker 1: claim is separate from this stuff, that the food prices
Speaker 1: are a combination of obviously sheer greed, but residual effects
Speaker 1: from the pandemic, then it it'll it. The Trump campaign
Speaker 1: can go, oh oh, so now we do take into
Speaker 1: account how the pandemic applies to the numbers that you're seeing,
Speaker 1: and all of your stupid job creation, that whole lie
Speaker 1: becomes exposed.
Speaker 4: Are absolutely dying with what they've done, They've destroyed the economy.
Speaker 4: And all you have to do is look at a Paul.
Speaker 4: The poll say eighty and eighty five and even ninety
Speaker 4: percent that the Trump economy was great, that their economy
Speaker 4: was terrible.
Speaker 1: Well, what it said is were you doing better at
Speaker 1: this excuse me, at this time versus that time. I
Speaker 1: don't remember if it was ninety percent of one, but
Speaker 1: I have seen one in the high seventies and okay,
Speaker 1: but I also don't know the methodology for it. But frankly,
Speaker 1: that's what debates are for. You throw those out and
Speaker 1: then the fact checkers go and do their things. And frankly,
Speaker 1: she should have been ready with.
Speaker 2: That, and she wasn't.
Speaker 1: She was shaking her head and laughing, which, God help
Speaker 1: you if somebody watching that debate went to the grocery
Speaker 1: store that afternoon and it's still fresh in their mind
Speaker 1: the number that they saw appear on that screen that
Speaker 1: they had to tap their card against, and you're laughing.
Speaker 8: If Donald Trump were to be reelected.
Speaker 1: All right, So I'm just going to tell you know
Speaker 1: that Kamala Harris had that we run on the air that.
Speaker 2: You all love so much. We're starting down that road, kids.
Speaker 8: Donald Trump were to be reelected, he will sign a
Speaker 8: national abortion ban. Understanding his Project twenty twenty five, there
Speaker 8: would be a national abortion a monitor that would be
Speaker 8: monitoring your pregnancies, your miscarriages. I think the American people
Speaker 8: believe that certain freedoms, in particular the freedom to make
Speaker 8: decisions about one's own body, should not be made by
Speaker 8: the government.
Speaker 1: This is, by the way, this is the reverse of
Speaker 1: the bias from ABC News. What she's saying is so
Speaker 1: clearly without any foundation.
Speaker 5: Right, And that's why the moderator stepped in and said
Speaker 5: that he's actually not called for a national abortion ban,
Speaker 5: and he's disavowed Project twenty twenty five, and that's what
Speaker 5: that is.
Speaker 2: How yeah, that is Oh oh wait, I'm sorry. I
Speaker 2: dreamed that nobody said anything.
Speaker 1: And yet had it been reversed, and we saw many
Speaker 1: examples that would have been put out there, and he
Speaker 1: could even soft sell it. He could be like the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five project is was a think project by
Speaker 1: the folks at Heritage Foundation. The President has on numerous
Speaker 1: occasions said that that is not his plan, and the
Speaker 1: abortion ban he has said and he yeah, he'll go
Speaker 1: down through it.
Speaker 2: Or he went down through.
Speaker 1: It is a non starter because it is a state
Speaker 1: level thing. And by the way, I know that that
Speaker 1: irritates some pro life people who now want to go
Speaker 1: to a national band. It's not I don't think it's
Speaker 1: the overwhelming part of his constituency. But he's settled where
Speaker 1: a lot of other people have settled, where this is
Speaker 1: going to be a state's issue. And then if you
Speaker 1: want a band in your state, you go to work there.
Speaker 1: And if you want it to be as anybody any time,
Speaker 1: then you go to work there and you fight it
Speaker 1: out on these fifty fronts. But at the very least,
Speaker 1: it separates an issue one of a thousand issues that
Speaker 1: are out there that somehow the FEDS have decided that
Speaker 1: they're supposed to be And even though we have enumerated powers,
Speaker 1: which is a thing, and no, there was no correction.
Speaker 8: What Donald Trump did, let's talk about this with COVID,
Speaker 8: is he actually thanked President She for what he did
Speaker 8: during COVID. Look at his tweet, thank you President She
Speaker 8: exclamation point when we know that she was responsible for
Speaker 8: lacking and not giving us.
Speaker 2: I'm a pauser. I agree with.
Speaker 8: Her transparency about the origins of COVID.
Speaker 2: There's a little second there. I agree with her.
Speaker 1: I remember on the air when I saw that tweet,
Speaker 1: going what are you doing now? Was he thanking him
Speaker 1: for COVID?
Speaker 2: Obviously he was not.
Speaker 1: And you know, somewhere and someone or somewhere in Donald's mind,
Speaker 1: he decided that he felt that that was advantageous. And
Speaker 1: I don't know the reason why. I still don't understand
Speaker 1: it to this date. That being said, if we want
Speaker 1: to talk about tweets surrounding COVID.
Speaker 2: Having to do with China, and.
Speaker 1: This is why I was got a little irritated when
Speaker 1: Trump did this is because China, along with the World
Speaker 1: Health Organization, started manipulating the messaging immediately. We all remember this,
Speaker 1: and of course nobody was held accountable for any of that.
Speaker 1: He's got in there and started doing their thing. Who's
Speaker 1: tweeting now? Now it's not this, it's all the things
Speaker 1: that in that tweet they said it wasn't it turned
Speaker 1: out to be.
Speaker 5: I'm confused by that last piece of audio because was
Speaker 5: that a mistake And did she just say that that
Speaker 5: COVID came from a lab that was that a mistake
Speaker 5: or was that intentional? Because she's flip flopping her policy
Speaker 5: as she always does.
Speaker 1: Oh you know what, that's a fair question. Let's yeah,
Speaker 1: let's listen to it again.
Speaker 8: With that contra Donald Trump did, let's talk about this
Speaker 8: with COVID. Is he actually thanked President She for what
Speaker 8: he did during COVID? Look at his tweet, thank you
Speaker 8: President She exclamation point when we know that she was
Speaker 8: responsible for lacking and I'm not giving us transparency about
Speaker 8: the origins of COVID.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I guess you could argue it is.
Speaker 1: I guess they would argue that it was simply they
Speaker 1: didn't tell you how bad the infection was when they
Speaker 1: were burning bodies.
Speaker 2: But she's not saying that.
Speaker 1: It's a typical answer where she'll leave it up to
Speaker 1: her media friends to interpret it on panels however they
Speaker 1: wont and it will be most favorable for her. But yeah, no,
Speaker 1: you can make that argument, absolutely, But that's not where
Speaker 1: it went off the rails, because you know, the big
Speaker 1: looming issue out there, and by the way, it is
Speaker 1: an issue that has had some significant updates here in
Speaker 1: just the last twenty four hours. And the issue, well,
Speaker 1: let me do this. I'm looking at it because it's
Speaker 1: a longer cut. The issue, of course, has to do
Speaker 1: with Ohio and ducks and geese and cat so now
Speaker 1: dogs and police and local elected officials and job apparently
Speaker 1: a jobs thing and twenty thousand individuals who relocated in
Speaker 1: a very short amount of time to a town of
Speaker 1: sixty thousand, adding you know, thirty three percent population growth
Speaker 1: and with people without We'll get into the cats and
Speaker 1: dogs part here in just a moment, but the part
Speaker 1: that can't get lost in this is the idea that
Speaker 1: you have a place that has schools and medical facilities
Speaker 1: and shopping facilities and jobs that are commensurate with the population.
Speaker 1: Sometimes they're not, and that's where you get you know,
Speaker 1: you know, bigger or lesser growth. But you never get
Speaker 1: growth like that unless you're the prairie during you know,
Speaker 1: during westward expansion. Right, nobody's seeing growth like that, and
Speaker 1: it immediately taxes resources. And so whether you think it's
Speaker 1: one reason they went through or you think it's another,
Speaker 1: you can't deny the fact that if you live in
Speaker 1: that area, it impacts you. Just look here in North
Speaker 1: Carolina over the last ten years, what has happened because
Speaker 1: of growth to prices. Now it can be good your
Speaker 1: home's worth a lot more than it used to be.
Speaker 1: But if you rent, your rent is crazy compared what
Speaker 1: it used to be. And it's all over the state. Now,
Speaker 1: Raleigh was really hit hard to Tryads doing it, Charlotte's
Speaker 1: doing it. These are all places that have experienced exponential
Speaker 1: growth that doesn't even compare to what this town in
Speaker 1: Ohio did. So it's a nice Peatrie dish case study
Speaker 1: that has become an animal debate, a migrant debate, a
Speaker 1: debate about everything under the sun. And it's a fair conversation,
Speaker 1: but it's being manipulated. And I'll tell you what those
Speaker 1: updates are. We'll play the audio for you, and we'll
Speaker 1: do it all next coming up here on the CaCO
Speaker 1: Day radio program. But it's not just Wednesday, it's Wednesday,
Speaker 1: September eleventh. And one of the things yesterday there there
Speaker 1: were arguably there, arguably there were probably three issues that
Speaker 1: Trump should have core focused on to the extent that
Speaker 1: he can't. I understand the debate, moderators are going to
Speaker 1: go in certain directions and then Kamala is going.
Speaker 2: To do her thing.
Speaker 1: But and then Kamala probably had two or three issues
Speaker 1: that she should have focused on and really drove it home.
Speaker 1: And I've seen debates where candidates refused to get away
Speaker 1: from those issues. They were a little more flexible yesterday,
Speaker 1: and I think they covered more ground. I think an
Speaker 1: easy layup, but there's always going to be these. I
Speaker 1: think an easy layup for Trump. That I didn't hear
Speaker 1: yesterday and I was a little surprised, was when we
Speaker 1: were talking about the immigration stuff. It's it's to talk
Speaker 1: about immigration under the lens of the story in Ohio,
Speaker 1: which I know you're going to be shocked to learn,
Speaker 1: even though you've been told it's been completely debunked. It's
Speaker 1: not necessarily the case, which I will explain here in
Speaker 1: a moment. But one of the things that is undeniable
Speaker 1: and reporting from the current presidential administration backs this up,
Speaker 1: is that the encounters on the border, and remember these
Speaker 1: are the encounters where they have acquired these individuals of
Speaker 1: folks who are on our terror watch list. Obviously it
Speaker 1: was significantly up because as you're having more people come
Speaker 1: there and be processed through this migrant program. You know
Speaker 1: the numbers, the numbers are going to follow the other numbers.
Speaker 1: But there's also reporting out and don't believe me believe
Speaker 1: the New York Times and Washington Post if that makes
Speaker 1: you feel better that they know that some were into
Speaker 1: the interior of the country. This is a reporting that
Speaker 1: took place about a month ago. So standing there on
Speaker 1: that stage yesterday, and I think not making the point
Speaker 1: that this administration has made it easier for individuals who
Speaker 1: probably watched videos from nine to eleven with no pants
Speaker 1: on because they're so excited about it into our country
Speaker 1: is I think that's a pretty good point to make.
Speaker 1: But that's not where we started. No, we started here
Speaker 1: in Springfield.
Speaker 4: They're eating the dogs the people that came in, they're
Speaker 4: eating the cats, they're eating they're eating the pets of
Speaker 4: the people that live there. And this is what's happening
Speaker 4: in our country. And it's a shame as far as
Speaker 4: the rallies are concerned. As far as the reason they
Speaker 4: go is they like what I say. They want to
Speaker 4: bring our country back. They want to make America great
Speaker 4: against very simple phrase, make America great again. She's destroying
Speaker 4: this country and if she becomes president, this country doesn't
Speaker 4: have a chance of success. Not only success will end
Speaker 4: up being Venezuela on steroids.
Speaker 7: I just want to clarify here. You bring up Springfield,
Speaker 7: Ohio and ABCD was going to reach out to the
Speaker 7: city manager there. He told us there have been no
Speaker 7: credible reports of specific claims of pets being harmed injured.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, well let's look at that. He's correcting him
Speaker 1: on the fly. Ross you dug into this. Have there
Speaker 1: has there been no reports? Huh, nobody, nobody reached out
Speaker 1: at all.
Speaker 5: Well, you know, at first Springfield, like he said, the
Speaker 5: police department said that wasn't the case. Well, first off,
Speaker 5: when your pets team, when you're pets go missing, you
Speaker 5: don't really contact the police. That isn't something you do.
Speaker 5: But they came out yesterday and they said there was
Speaker 5: actually a case, and they came out with a nine
Speaker 5: to one one audio. Yeah, a police report. You could
Speaker 5: see the nine one one call log.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the call log audio. Yet that I've seen, that.
Speaker 5: Was towards the end of the day, at the end
Speaker 5: of the news cycle.
Speaker 1: And the other thing is, too when what the quote
Speaker 1: that he's talking about from ABC, They actually said two things.
Speaker 1: They said quote the city manager said it, by the way,
Speaker 1: not the police department. But they also said, because the
Speaker 1: police don't take reports of missing pets. Okay, just like
Speaker 1: it's like, all right, let's say the police department up
Speaker 1: in wake Forest, right ross calls and he's like, I
Speaker 1: need Lotto numbers and uh and and they're like, you're insane.
Speaker 1: Don't call us again. You're wasting our time and we'll
Speaker 1: come arrestue and then they can go on. They be like,
Speaker 1: there's been nobody who's called for Loto numbers. Well, why
Speaker 1: is it because we don't provide them. Nobody's been given
Speaker 1: lotto numbers.
Speaker 2: That's what That's how it works there.
Speaker 1: Now here's the again, there is there's that part of it.
Speaker 1: It is undeniable that that dude's carrying a goose. The
Speaker 1: pushback on that is it's not within the city limits.
Speaker 1: And while those are the more memorable aspects of all
Speaker 1: of this, it goes to the point that I was
Speaker 1: making that what happens when you increase the population of
Speaker 1: a town and its services by a third in a
Speaker 1: very short period is everybody's service and ability and purchasing
Speaker 1: power or the ability to purchase what they need, compete
Speaker 1: for jobs, you know, the medical schools for the kids.
Speaker 1: It all, it has to adapt, and there's huge amounts
Speaker 1: of growing pains, and it also has to adapt differently
Speaker 1: because it's one thing if the RTP area of the
Speaker 1: Triangle starts to blow up housing developments all over Morrisville
Speaker 1: and Carry and areas surrounding it. The difference is the
Speaker 1: folks that are coming in and causing that growth, that
Speaker 1: explosion of growth in those areas are also coming in
Speaker 1: with good jobs generally, right they're moving there because they're
Speaker 1: you know, the work of tech jobs are doing this,
Speaker 1: and so the likelihood is many of those individuals are
Speaker 1: are going to be a net positive from a tax
Speaker 1: perspective to the usage of public programs, be it public schools, roads,
Speaker 1: things like that right there, net tax payers, whereas almost
Speaker 1: exclusively in this area, the growth has been by those
Speaker 1: who are negative taxpayers right where they use more services
Speaker 1: than on average that will be provided from the taxes.
Speaker 2: Collected to them.
Speaker 1: It's a wildly different algorithm when you're dealing with that,
Speaker 1: and yes, then you get the sensational stuff and when
Speaker 1: you're going to come out and you're just going to
Speaker 1: flat deny it because one city manager said it, but
Speaker 1: not include the part where they don't take those reports.
Speaker 1: Even though there is now a nine to one one
Speaker 1: log where somebody attempted to I guess spile.
Speaker 2: One of those reports is disingenuous.
Speaker 1: And if ABC is going to do a Candy Crowley,
Speaker 1: who was also ABC and corrected and not corrected, it's
Speaker 1: an entirety. People are going to think that you're doing
Speaker 1: this from a bias perspective because.
Speaker 7: You are used by individuals within the immigrant community.
Speaker 4: All I see people on Tellien. Let me just say here,
Speaker 4: this is the people on television. Certain my dog was
Speaker 4: taken and used for food. So maybe he said that,
Speaker 4: and maybe that's a good thing to say for a
Speaker 4: city manager.
Speaker 7: I'm not taking this from television people.
Speaker 4: I'm telling dog was eaten by the people that went there.
Speaker 7: Again, the Springfield City manager says, there's no evidence of that.
Speaker 7: Vice President, I'll let you respond.
Speaker 2: We'll find out.
Speaker 1: And you know, the thing is he's right, because we
Speaker 1: always do, don't we Just a little ways down the
Speaker 1: road we find out and sometimes yeah, I know that
Speaker 1: did happen, or sometimes no, that didn't happen. But to
Speaker 1: say with certainty because the city and by the way,
Speaker 1: why is the city manager who this guy?
Speaker 2: What's this by?
Speaker 1: This dude from Aby said, I don't want to remember
Speaker 1: his name? Uh, why is a phone called a city manager? Which,
Speaker 1: by the way, that dude didn't make some intern did
Speaker 1: more credible than a woman who's standing in front of
Speaker 1: her house identifying who she is, showing a picture of
Speaker 1: her pet. Not credible more so than the city manager,
Speaker 1: because I know what you're saying to say, Well, maybe
Speaker 1: this woman's dog ran off and she's decided that that's
Speaker 1: what And that's perfectly that is perfectly fine to go.
Speaker 2: Ahead and uh and and and.
Speaker 1: Think right, because you should think that you should be
Speaker 1: you should be suspect. Do you have proof that it was?
Speaker 1: And then those questions should be asked. But also the
Speaker 1: city manager saying, now that didn't happen, you need to
Speaker 1: you need to be just as suspect of him. What
Speaker 1: are his motivation? That guy's an elected official. Arguably he's
Speaker 1: got more motivation. Can he prove that this didn't happen?
Speaker 1: And the way you prove it is figure out what
Speaker 1: happened to her dog?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 1: Okay, we found him. We found him down the road blocks.
Speaker 1: He was out in the ditch. Sadly he was hit
Speaker 1: by a car. It looks like he crawled down there,
Speaker 1: you know, boom. All right, solved, But you can't come
Speaker 1: out and definitively say it's this thing or that thing
Speaker 1: when in both cases, like the in both cases one
Speaker 1: of those two may be right, but you can't prove which. Now,
Speaker 1: if she comes up with other witnesses or a video
Speaker 1: or something, you think ABC News is going to be
Speaker 1: issuing a correction.
Speaker 2: Hell no, Understand.
Speaker 8: This is someone who has openly said he would terminate
Speaker 8: on quoting terminate the Constitution of the United States that he.
Speaker 1: By the way, can Rosser pulled me the audio of
Speaker 1: Trump saying he's will terminate the Constitution of the United States.
Speaker 1: I want to play that, all right, ross gonna grab that.
Speaker 1: I'm sure it's in the archive because if he said that,
Speaker 1: that's insane and we would have.
Speaker 8: That right weaponize the Department of Justice against his political enemies.
Speaker 2: Do I have to say, I don't have to say
Speaker 2: anything there.
Speaker 8: Someone who has openly expressed disdain for members of our military,
Speaker 8: understand what it would mean if Donald Trump were back
Speaker 8: in the White House with no guardrails.
Speaker 1: Again, it's the which has as much credibility, by the way,
Speaker 1: as that was just announced by that ABC News anchor
Speaker 1: over the dog has just as much credibility that he
Speaker 1: said suckers and losers. You realize that, right, There is
Speaker 1: the same amount of evidence as I understand it, of
Speaker 1: that woman claiming that her dog was taken in Eden,
Speaker 1: as there is this that this Atlantic reporter put out
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump said suckers and losers. And remember they
Speaker 1: had to go back and correct it. ABC had to
Speaker 1: correct it because they secondarily sourced this through that General
Speaker 1: Millie's book. But what Milly said is he heard people
Speaker 1: say that Trump said that, which I don't know. I'm
Speaker 1: not a lawyer, but I've watched Law and Order a
Speaker 1: few times. I don't think you can do that as
Speaker 1: evidence in court. It's called here's it, that's hearsay squared.
Speaker 1: So the it's it's the old accuse them of what
Speaker 1: you're doing. So, you know, Kamla to this point, her
Speaker 1: main points have been predicated on Trump. Trump is Project
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, Trump's gonna get rid of the Constitution,
Speaker 1: Trump's going to pass the National Abortion Man And there
Speaker 1: is zero evidence of any of this. In fact, there's
Speaker 1: pretty firm evidence in the opposition, especially as it pertains
Speaker 1: to twenty twenty five things. But she just throws that
Speaker 1: out there, and you'll notice there's no ABC audio rosted
Speaker 1: and triminy out of there.
Speaker 2: It doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: And the suckers and losers say, the Charlottesville thing is
Speaker 1: only missing from that only thing missing from that trifecta.
Speaker 2: And don't you worry she brought it up later.
Speaker 1: But I think that on the immigration thing, I think
Speaker 1: the nine to eleven angle probably would have been the
Speaker 1: best way to do it. And by the way, just
Speaker 1: in case you're like, well, you know, nobody really thinks
Speaker 1: about that. Our studios in Greensboro sit above the literally
Speaker 1: above because around the second story looking down onto the
Speaker 1: ball field for the Rockers, which is the minor league
Speaker 1: baseball team and the soccer team that plays here in
Speaker 1: High Point. In this morning, I'm making I'm getting some tea.
Speaker 1: I'm walking around the studios and we have like a
Speaker 1: second we have a balcony on the second and second
Speaker 1: story outside and it looks over the stadium and all
Speaker 1: the stadium lights are on this morning when I'm coming
Speaker 1: into the studio, which I'm like, did somebody leave those
Speaker 1: on last night? Somebody's gonna get fired. What's that bill
Speaker 1: look like?
Speaker 9: Right?
Speaker 10: You know?
Speaker 2: The old curmudgeonly Bill pain Man in me came out.
Speaker 1: But then I realized I had I didn't realize that
Speaker 1: this is where they were holding the memorial walk. So
Speaker 1: for those of you who don't know, right now, most
Speaker 1: I don't want to say most of ECUs, I don't
Speaker 1: want you all out robin stuff. But a good portion
Speaker 1: of your fire rescue and law enforcement and their families
Speaker 1: and their friends are walking around the stadium.
Speaker 2: I think they're done.
Speaker 1: They just got done, because I walked out and they're
Speaker 1: up there having coffee and whatnot. And they were here
Speaker 1: at six in the morning, and they were doing a
Speaker 1: memorial walk. And if you look at the scoreboard, they
Speaker 1: have lists of fallen heroes. They have folks from nine
Speaker 1: to eleven. They have from three of the different rescue
Speaker 1: teams there that have some association with North Carolina. They
Speaker 1: have their names up on the board, and they're out there.
Speaker 1: They're out there at six in the morning right now,
Speaker 1: making sure that nobody does forget what happened, making sure
Speaker 1: that we have an understanding of the sacrifice that people
Speaker 1: are willing to put out there on the very same
Speaker 1: day that we're having to listen to a bunch of
Speaker 1: race hustlers sit here and talk about how there's a
Speaker 1: new civil rights movement based on a Dolphins receiver who
Speaker 1: uh decided that he didn't want to roll his window
Speaker 1: down and wanted to do one hundred plus miles an
Speaker 1: hour allegedly in a forty mile an hour zone. And
Speaker 1: I know, I'm tying a lot of stuff together, but
Speaker 1: it just really irritates me when there are some there
Speaker 1: are some bigger and better worded ways to I think
Speaker 1: slice and dice how people are feeling right now? Do
Speaker 1: you think that the members of law enforcement and the
Speaker 1: fire and rescue that are walking around the stadium right
Speaker 1: now with their families out here at you know, out
Speaker 1: here at six in the morning, whereas I, you know,
Speaker 1: my my fat butts sitting here in a chair eating
Speaker 1: a biscuit Ville steak biscuit. You're yeah with the cakilaki slide.
Speaker 1: If you don't get the cakilaki, I don't even know
Speaker 1: what you're doing. But right, and but I you know,
Speaker 1: I got a broadcast and I want to make sure
Speaker 1: and bring this up. Do you think that those individuals
Speaker 1: feel respected by the folks that are in the White
Speaker 1: House right now? I don't speak for him. Maybe they do.
Speaker 1: Do you feel that they feel that their appreciation for
Speaker 1: the job that they do, the outlier being that some
Speaker 1: of them don't do a good job and some of
Speaker 1: them don't have the temperament for it. And nobody disagrees
Speaker 1: with that. But when we're going to have another round
Speaker 1: of uh, you know, screw the police and and and
Speaker 1: look at this, and we're going to do it in
Speaker 1: the same way that we always do, where we pull
Speaker 1: some case where it's it's not pure as the as
Speaker 1: the you know, peers driven snow the details of it.
Speaker 1: It's a much more complex thing, and we're going to
Speaker 1: use it to bash on law enforcement and first responders
Speaker 1: and really, you know that that whole slice of society
Speaker 1: people are going to feel a way about it, And
Speaker 1: people are going to feel a way about it when
Speaker 1: you're shaking your head going and they're talking about grocery prices.
Speaker 1: And I think Trump could do a better job of
Speaker 1: leaning into some of this stuff, but he's Trump, and
Speaker 1: he's got an ego on him. I would have I
Speaker 1: was a billionaire, I think I do. I'm a radio guy,
Speaker 1: but not you know, not billionaire level ego, and I
Speaker 1: think that there was a couple things they're probably looking
Speaker 1: back at, going I probably should have said this, and
Speaker 1: that's why we're talking about it. So you went a
Speaker 1: weigh in eight eight eight nine three four seven eight
Speaker 1: seven four back in just a few Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 1: My slave driving bosses are forcing me to have two
Speaker 1: bourbon tasting events this week.
Speaker 2: The things I do.
Speaker 1: So last night we did the chop House. Thank it
Speaker 1: everyone who came out appreciated that. Thank you to chop House,
Speaker 1: Doug Ray, our sponsor for the event. Folks from Wealth
Speaker 1: Guardians appreciate all of all of that. A good time
Speaker 1: was had by all. But tomorrow we do it again,
Speaker 1: this time in the Triangle, and you know, I'll drag
Speaker 1: myself there and suffer through the injustice of having to
Speaker 1: sample find bourbons again.
Speaker 2: But I'd like you to join me. Don't make me
Speaker 2: do this alone. Sign up.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna get the link tweeted out for
Speaker 1: you a Casey on the radio or if you go
Speaker 1: to one o six one FM talk dot com. Uh,
Speaker 1: we have the event there. I think it's on the front.
Speaker 1: It's got a blue logo.
Speaker 2: And because I.
Speaker 1: Probably should have just made sure it's actual position because
Speaker 1: it moved earlier. Uh, because I want you to be
Speaker 1: able to find it. And uh, why don't you come
Speaker 1: out for a little while today, Come see us, Come,
Speaker 1: come hang with come hang with me Ross. Ross will
Speaker 1: not be there, but uh, he will be there in spirit.
Speaker 1: See that's a pun because spirits.
Speaker 2: See.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So if you scroll down just a little bit, it's
Speaker 1: on the left side, about three columns down at Stewart's
Speaker 1: Glass Bourbon Experience one O six one FM talk dot com.
Speaker 1: We'll get you there and uh, you can go ahead
Speaker 1: and get registered for that. We still have some tickets available.
Speaker 1: Is a really nice space. Obviously we're gonna have We're
Speaker 1: gonna have some Oh I'm just looking. Actually, I'm seeing
Speaker 1: some of the bourbons there they have listed. I had
Speaker 1: not seen exactly what they were gonna be, just a
Speaker 1: couple of them. All they did get the loaner Okay, yeah,
Speaker 1: have you had the Have you had the bourbon whiskey
Speaker 1: tequila cask finish? You need to try and that's gonna
Speaker 1: be one of the ones we're trying. Some of the
Speaker 1: proceeds will be benefiting the NC Fallen Firefighters Foundation and
Speaker 1: I Sell Health is our our sponsor for that who
Speaker 1: if you don't know who that is, that's another good
Speaker 1: thing because the guys will be there. And Brian Wilson
Speaker 1: is his name, and basically that's a dude who saves
Speaker 1: people a bunch of money on health insurance who are
Speaker 1: buying Obamacare on single stuff.
Speaker 5: They like they have the.
Speaker 1: Ones that meet the requirements, but more importantly that meet
Speaker 1: what you need. And so we're really I love the
Speaker 1: great sponsors that we have. So yeah, why don't you register?
Speaker 1: Tell who tell whoever? May be judgmental, you have to have.
Speaker 1: You have a very important meeting today this evening, and
Speaker 1: then come on up or bring him and we'll do
Speaker 1: it to it.
Speaker 2: So did I hear ross? Did I hear correctly that
Speaker 2: Boston Paul's coming up?
Speaker 4: Was that?
Speaker 8: Or?
Speaker 2: Am I crazy?
Speaker 10: Was that?
Speaker 2: I think? I think I heard that?
Speaker 5: So no, he will be there.
Speaker 1: Yes, oh boy, you better get there before he does.
Speaker 2: Do we have enough bourbon? I need to check?
Speaker 5: Can you imagine you're like second in line and like
Speaker 5: there's Boston Paul in front of.
Speaker 1: You, you just go home, You're just like hey, and
Speaker 1: then he turns to you and he says, you know
Speaker 1: you can't understand him, and then you're like, all.
Speaker 2: Right, well I guess some out so yeah, I'm kidding.
Speaker 2: Maybe I'm not. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Uh so, yeah, No, it's gonna be a fun event.
Speaker 1: We'd love to see there. All right, couple things, a
Speaker 1: couple things, just really back on the cat and dog thing,
Speaker 1: just to show you how comical all of this is.
Speaker 1: And it's not comical the idea that somebody would have
Speaker 1: their pet eating, or even that the allegations are out there,
Speaker 1: whether they're true or not, that we're having to have
Speaker 1: this kind of discussion, and it's it pulls away, to
Speaker 1: some extent from the bigger discussion, which is what happens
Speaker 1: when you when you take a population and increase it
Speaker 1: in a year's time or whatever it was by thirty
Speaker 1: three percent by people who most most of which who
Speaker 1: do not are not net tax profitable. Right, they're not
Speaker 1: putting more into the system than is coming out. The
Speaker 1: growing pains are significant, and these are fair questions, but
Speaker 1: just to show you how unseerious the whole thing is
Speaker 1: by the Democrats, I guess they test Fang Fang's lover
Speaker 1: to come out and got ahead and do the pushback
Speaker 1: because he can't handle the memes. I'm, of course referring
Speaker 1: to Eric I will nuke you Swallwell, who took to
Speaker 1: the took to the floor of the house yesterday, and
Speaker 1: he is so unseerious about this. He didn't even understand
Speaker 1: what the allegations are, even though it's in the picture
Speaker 1: behind him. Think about this, you all, Even if you
Speaker 1: think it's a joke or you think it's deadly serious,
Speaker 1: at least you understand what, you know, what the allegations are.
Speaker 2: This is he.
Speaker 1: Decides he's going to push back, but he I don't
Speaker 1: know if somebody yelled to him what the issue was
Speaker 1: from across a loud room and he didn't hear them,
Speaker 1: Because this is what happened.
Speaker 3: What in the hell is this? The chairman tweets protect
Speaker 3: our ducks and kittens in Ohio because he goes some down,
Speaker 3: goes down some crazy rabbit hole completely debunked that aliens
Speaker 3: are eating pets.
Speaker 4: My god, are you okay, mister chairman?
Speaker 3: Because last year, for a very long time, you tweeted
Speaker 3: and promoted Kanye West as he was calling for genocide
Speaker 3: against the Jews, and you kept it up. And now
Speaker 3: when we have victims coming here, you're tweeting this nonsense.
Speaker 4: I don't know why you would do this.
Speaker 2: I hope you're okay.
Speaker 3: I don't know if the aliens who are eating your
Speaker 3: ducks are in the room with us right now. But
Speaker 3: mister Chairman, this is a serious issue. These people have
Speaker 3: loved ones who have been lost.
Speaker 2: What the hell is he even talking about?
Speaker 1: By the way, does he mean aliens like illegal aliens,
Speaker 1: which I thought if you're a Democrat and you said
Speaker 1: that they kicked you out of the club, or does.
Speaker 2: He mean like e t I. I don't know what's
Speaker 2: going on with him.
Speaker 1: I wonder I wonder too if he's okay and throwing
Speaker 1: out that the chairman was tweeting the stuff to uh
Speaker 1: against the Jews with the help of Kanye West, or
Speaker 1: did he tweet something from Kanye West and then after
Speaker 1: Kanye went and did those crazy interviews.
Speaker 2: And they're like, dah see, see who you support?
Speaker 1: Because I feel like maybe that's more along the lines
Speaker 1: of what he's referring to.
Speaker 2: But I don't know.
Speaker 1: Maybe he thinks actual aliens, Maybe he thinks Theanu Naki
Speaker 1: you're eating the pets, which I don't know what they eat.
Speaker 1: I know they like gold, but you know that's the
Speaker 1: and they like building pyramids or something I saw in
Speaker 1: History Channel or whatever. But other than that, I'm just confused.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's Alf. Maybe they you know, Eric Swalwell is
Speaker 1: the dude who had Alf dissected or would if that
Speaker 1: had been real? Did We talked about this incessantly? You
Speaker 1: all know what happened. Right at the end of the
Speaker 1: series Alf. They went, they took him to a lab
Speaker 1: and dissected him. You want to talk about a bummer
Speaker 1: of an ending. The problem was is it was he
Speaker 1: was taking the lab at the end, and they thought
Speaker 1: they were gonna do another season where he would have
Speaker 1: escaped or something, but they didn't, so the series ended
Speaker 1: with him getting dissected by the governor, big eagle, evil
Speaker 1: big government. I'm telling you, man, this is People are
Speaker 1: so unserious about this. And he's got the meme up
Speaker 1: there too. Do you know how they always print the boards. Ah,
Speaker 1: here's the memes and Trump's by was tweeting memes all night.
Speaker 1: Look it is true social This is him with cats
Speaker 1: on a plane, him with ducks in a field. He's
Speaker 1: having a big old time.
Speaker 11: Man.
Speaker 1: All right, let's grab a call or two Boston paulling you.
Speaker 1: There's Boston Paul getting ready, getting pregamed.
Speaker 2: What's up?
Speaker 12: Yeah, man, I have to correct you. You shout it up,
Speaker 12: all right, but uh you finished with the bourbon with
Speaker 12: get it to you. It's not tonight, it's tomorrow.
Speaker 2: Night or tomorrow night.
Speaker 4: I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, forgive me, forgive.
Speaker 1: Me, all right, and uh I have I have another Yeah,
Speaker 1: I have another thing tonight. That's a private thing, so
Speaker 1: for a client. So that's when my brain's not working.
Speaker 6: Maybe it's the effect last night.
Speaker 12: But anyway, if anybody has issue with tickets, I have
Speaker 12: issues and not getting not getting tickets. But your confirmation
Speaker 12: of purchasing the ticket, just it with you?
Speaker 13: Is the QR co Yeah yeah, yeah, you make QR
Speaker 13: code on that. Okay, yeah, so yeah, the receipt, the
Speaker 13: receipt will get you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a I don't know, Boston Paul. Not everything's
Speaker 1: on paper and horse and buggy anymore.
Speaker 9: Man.
Speaker 2: Some of it's digital Bruno.
Speaker 12: It's terrible.
Speaker 2: I know.
Speaker 12: It's that that debate last night. If that was a courtroom,
Speaker 12: I would have heard a lot of objections saying meeting
Speaker 12: the witness sustained. Rephrase your question, mister mir mir.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it was the regulation of it, if you
Speaker 1: want to call it.
Speaker 2: That was a mess.
Speaker 1: Sorry, boss and Paul I gotta go so again, leave tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Leave some for everybody else. That's all we ask. All right,
Speaker 1: we got more of your calls coming up. Raceed Agic
Speaker 1: from the Weather Channel morning. He's here to I don't know.
Speaker 1: I guess looks like now you're dealing with some weather again.
Speaker 1: I was watching everybody with the big map of Louisiana
Speaker 1: and that area and the rain totals and.
Speaker 11: All of that.
Speaker 1: But then I saw the path and it's like, maybe
Speaker 1: if you're in the very western tip of North Carolina,
Speaker 1: but we don't really see impact even from the through
Speaker 1: the Piedmont or triangle.
Speaker 11: Try it right, yeah, I mean what's going to be
Speaker 11: more interesting, I think for us is what happens off
Speaker 11: the coast. I don't know if anybody's been paying attention
Speaker 11: besides franc Seene ninety mile part hurricane right now, forecast
Speaker 11: to get a little bit stronger and head toward Theiana
Speaker 11: coast later today early tonight, but guidance trying to suggest
Speaker 11: that maybe low pressure late in the weekend early next
Speaker 11: week develops to our east, and that becomes either a
Speaker 11: store or something more formidable for us to deal with,
Speaker 11: especially for the coast in terms of rain and wind,
Speaker 11: and maybe even to the interior.
Speaker 4: So a lot of.
Speaker 11: Little things to work out. The next couple of days
Speaker 11: will be real nice seeing a little cloud this morning,
Speaker 11: more sun later lo to mid eighties, partial sun tomorrow
Speaker 11: near eighty, and then I think we're on the eastern
Speaker 11: fringes of any showers that do happen or thunder showers
Speaker 11: on Friday, Friday night and Saturday. I know they moved
Speaker 11: some football games across the state already from Friday night
Speaker 11: to Thursday night. Not a bad idea, because there is
Speaker 11: a better chance, although it's not great, of seeing some
Speaker 11: showers Friday afternoon and Friday evening into Saturday. And then
Speaker 11: early next week, I think we'll have a chance of
Speaker 11: seeing that low which may develop off the Carolina's keyword
Speaker 11: there is may come west in Inland right around the
Speaker 11: day Tuesday timeframe. Maybe even a better chance of seeing
Speaker 11: So now the hurricane Center hasn't indicated yet, and I
Speaker 11: emphasize yet that this is an area to be concerned
Speaker 11: about yeah, they just did look at that. As of
Speaker 11: the eight o'clock update here that just came out, They've
Speaker 11: just circled a yellow area off the coast of the
Speaker 11: Carolina's along a frontal boundary. There could be subtropical tropical
Speaker 11: development early next week and seven days. That chance is
Speaker 11: at twenty percent. So that's new as of right now.
Speaker 11: That just came in as I refreshed the page that
Speaker 11: just popped up.
Speaker 1: So well, hold on, hold on called the eight o'clock
Speaker 1: the eight o'clock update. It's seven forty seven.
Speaker 11: Dude, Yeah, I know that. Sometimes they said about early
Speaker 11: minutes before the they.
Speaker 1: Got false sacvertising.
Speaker 11: There's a lot of things that are false in the
Speaker 11: work that I do, so why not the updates in
Speaker 11: the well listen, that's rated lower stage. Hurrying the truth? Man,
Speaker 11: what are you going to do? But again, impacts from
Speaker 11: franccene minimal. You go west a little bit better. I
Speaker 11: really think the worst will be from about the Georgia
Speaker 11: Alabama border into central Tennessee in points west and eastern Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi.
Speaker 11: Heaviest rain three to six inches of rain, strongest wins
Speaker 11: may get a little breezy here locally just because of
Speaker 11: the pressure gradient. But uh, I think limited rain. If
Speaker 11: I said one or two, one being fran scene impacts,
Speaker 11: two being this new area off the coast, which we'll
Speaker 11: have a greater impact here potentially. I think it's the
Speaker 11: latter as we get into next week. So I'm certainly
Speaker 11: to talk about it. And then I gotta go find
Speaker 11: with the E B C, the E F the G
Speaker 11: name storm is if that does get a name. So
Speaker 11: things are complicated, so.
Speaker 4: She'll be busy.
Speaker 1: All right, Well, you got lots to do, so you
Speaker 1: n it to that.
Speaker 2: We'll talk in an hour.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, there you go, Rais ed Ajac, your
Speaker 1: calls and yeah, we got lots more audio coming up
Speaker 1: here on the CaCO Day radio program. Phone call or
Speaker 1: two and we will we will roll from here. Randy,
Speaker 1: real quick.
Speaker 2: What's uthing?
Speaker 10: Hey?
Speaker 9: I was just calling about the debate last night, a
Speaker 9: little dejected from it because, uh, you know, I'm a
Speaker 9: Republican and uh you know, I thought maybe, uh we
Speaker 9: would have been better served to having another person with
Speaker 9: the Republican Party running for president, but we got Trump,
Speaker 9: and you know, so I'm going to support Trump because
Speaker 9: I like his policies and it just seemed a little
Speaker 9: scripted last night. And to me, to me, Kamal Harris,
Speaker 9: this is the first time that I've seen her where
Speaker 9: she seemed to be Chris on every question and every response. Uh,
Speaker 9: she never got fact checked. Trump got fact checked. And
Speaker 9: I just I just I just believe that Trump was
Speaker 9: on the defense the whole night.
Speaker 10: And uh, and she did get under his skin.
Speaker 9: I mean, if I had to have a debate winner
Speaker 9: and choose one, it would have been Harris last night,
Speaker 9: just because of no word salads.
Speaker 10: And I'll really believe that she need to lay Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well so, and that's the thing there.
Speaker 1: And I don't think you have to physically know the
Speaker 1: questions like Donna Brazil gave the questions to Hillary.
Speaker 2: We know that to really kind of have it.
Speaker 1: And thanks for the call to have that advantage because
Speaker 1: you kind of know where if maybe if the moderators
Speaker 1: are in your corner, you kind of know what they're
Speaker 1: going to ask you without really giving you the questions,
Speaker 1: you know what I'm saying. But she definitely looked crispur
Speaker 1: and she has and maybe it's that differential that makes
Speaker 1: people think, yeah, definitely she won because it's an improvement, Jamal,
Speaker 1: I got a minute and a half, so I'm gonna
Speaker 1: challenge you.
Speaker 2: The package dealer would go ahead.
Speaker 6: Donald Trump won it the bate hands down last night,
Speaker 6: and I will tell you why she attempted to get
Speaker 6: up under his skin. You can see a lot of
Speaker 6: people were saying on Twitter, all she's doing is trying
Speaker 6: to make him mad. Only one time he got she
Speaker 6: got under his skin, and he showed it was when
Speaker 6: she talked about the crow's eyes. Every time you kept
Speaker 6: turning around Donald Trump.
Speaker 10: He shut her up with her own line.
Speaker 6: He was like, excuse me, I'm talking.
Speaker 10: They purposely let them go back and forth because they
Speaker 10: were trying to give her that line to do. Donald
Speaker 10: Trump took her line David back tour, even though you
Speaker 10: had ABC trying to set it up so she could.
Speaker 10: Every time Donald she kept calling Donald Trump every name.
Speaker 10: He stood right there and just smiled, and he didn't
Speaker 10: even look hard way that when she was talking. Every
Speaker 10: time he said something, she would look his way. You
Speaker 10: can clearly tell that man was what we always wanted. Donald.
Speaker 10: Don't let him get on your skin.
Speaker 2: As we get things cooking this morning.
Speaker 1: Obviously, the debate last night but there's you know, there's
Speaker 1: some other stuff going on. It's kind of tied in
Speaker 1: with one of the topics that was discussed yesterday, obviously
Speaker 1: with Ohio and Haitian immigrants and cats and dogs and
Speaker 1: bear lions and bears OMEI and all of that. But again,
Speaker 1: the reality on the ground is, well, the memes are
Speaker 1: a thing, and it is inaccurate to say that there
Speaker 1: have been no reports and then just say it's been debunked,
Speaker 1: which is a constant strategy that the media will go
Speaker 1: along with because it's not the case. You can question
Speaker 1: the credibility of the residents, but you can't say that
Speaker 1: there's no reports out there because that's just simply not true.
Speaker 2: But it is.
Speaker 1: It is the economic the economics of what's going on,
Speaker 1: and that is just that is just one example. You're
Speaker 1: seeing it play out in Chicago and New York and
Speaker 1: in Colorado, and people are seeing a lot of stuff
Speaker 1: that they don't like, and they're seeing stuff that makes
Speaker 1: them very nervous. And you know, some people would tell
Speaker 1: you that to allow the fact that you have an
Speaker 1: influx equal to a third of your current population of
Speaker 1: people within a very short period of time, to question
Speaker 1: whether that will sap services or perhaps even create a
Speaker 1: heightened sense of danger. I mean inevitably, it's going to
Speaker 1: if you have more people on the road, you have
Speaker 1: more people doing things out and about interacting where you
Speaker 1: have to cross paths with them every day, it's going
Speaker 1: to greatly increase your chances.
Speaker 2: I would say greatly, but it will create It will.
Speaker 1: Increase based on the increased population, the chances of something
Speaker 1: like I don't know, an automobile accident or an assault,
Speaker 1: like a fight breaking out because there's more people but
Speaker 1: all so, everyone's a lot more tense. And and and
Speaker 1: to recognize, realize or bring that up. People would screen
Speaker 1: that you're a bigot, but you're not. You're dealing with
Speaker 1: the reality. It doesn't matter if it's Haitian immigrants or
Speaker 1: when university is out versus when university's in and we're
Speaker 1: talking about you know, alcohol related stuff crimes. One is
Speaker 1: going to have a higher propensity than the other. But
Speaker 1: everything gets pulled into this this. If you say anything,
Speaker 1: you're a you know, add the word you know. Anything
Speaker 1: with the word is at the end. And and and
Speaker 1: that is that is.
Speaker 2: An intent not to discuss the issue.
Speaker 1: They don't want to discuss because they realize that if
Speaker 1: you actually sat down and had a very numbers driven
Speaker 1: discussion about this stuff, you would find out they would
Speaker 1: they know that you would find out that it's undeniable,
Speaker 1: that it has created problems, and then they have to
Speaker 1: justify it.
Speaker 2: Like you can want what you want.
Speaker 1: And we've all looked, we've all made decisions about things
Speaker 1: in our life where we wanted to do something and
Speaker 1: we had to weigh the pros and the cons and
Speaker 1: because not everything's one hundred percent pro But you want
Speaker 1: to go on this, Uh, you want to go on
Speaker 1: this vacation. Okay, you want to go out. There's this dream,
Speaker 1: but you want to you want to take the family
Speaker 1: to Disney, which is going to cost you what is
Speaker 1: it currently one hundred and fifty thousand dollars or something.
Speaker 2: It's crazy, right, it's a it's a the amount of mine.
Speaker 1: I am single, and I have the luxury of it's
Speaker 1: a lot cheaper for me to vacation because it's just me. Uh,
Speaker 1: or you know, I go on, We'll go on to
Speaker 1: like a guy's golf trip or something like that. And
Speaker 1: I have more I have more spending power because I
Speaker 1: don't have that and even looking at what families pay
Speaker 1: to go to Disney is insane to me. But if
Speaker 1: you want to do that, go do your thing and
Speaker 1: enjoy yourself. And you're doing it because you want to
Speaker 1: watch your kids as ecstatic as like. I get that,
Speaker 1: but you recognize there's.
Speaker 2: A trade off.
Speaker 1: If we're going to do a Disney trip this year,
Speaker 1: you're not going to do this or that or this other.
Speaker 1: You're not going to be able to buy this or
Speaker 1: upgrade that, or maybe we won't replace that car for
Speaker 1: you know, a couple of years. We people make those
Speaker 1: trade offs every day, and we're adult enough that we
Speaker 1: can we can identify in our head that there will
Speaker 1: be some negative impact, but we're still going to go
Speaker 1: ahead and do it. And then we justify it, and
Speaker 1: we justify it in whatever way we want, and we
Speaker 1: go about it. And that's what a politician has to
Speaker 1: do with a policy. If you in his purest form,
Speaker 1: if a politician wants to do something, and if that
Speaker 1: thing is we need to be the compassionate ones in
Speaker 1: the world, and anyone who shows up there, let's go
Speaker 1: ahead and we'll run them through this program that we
Speaker 1: just kind of created out a whole cloth right where
Speaker 1: we kind of changed how the whole thing's supposed to work.
Speaker 1: You know, you have to presented a port of entry.
Speaker 1: We don't even do that. We're literally flying people in,
Speaker 1: flying people in. That's that's if you want to do that,
Speaker 1: you're gonna have to explain and justify it. And the
Speaker 1: way that they shut that down is they go, I
Speaker 1: can't believe you question this thing. You racist or you
Speaker 1: big it. And that's where we go. And then amazing
Speaker 1: things start to happen. Do you know the story One
Speaker 1: of the stories that's associated with all of this is
Speaker 1: the death.
Speaker 2: Of a young man named Aiden Clark.
Speaker 1: And Aiden Clark uh Aiden Clark eleven, Make sure I
Speaker 1: have this?
Speaker 2: Have this correct? Yeah, he's eleven years old. Yeah, there
Speaker 2: we go.
Speaker 1: So Aiden Clark was a student in in uh In,
Speaker 1: Ohio where we're talking about, and he's just honest. He's
Speaker 1: on a school bus doing what kids do, right, going
Speaker 1: to school and right, you know, jacking around with his
Speaker 1: friends and chatting about what they're gonna do after school,
Speaker 1: just kids stuff. When all of a sudden, their bus
Speaker 1: is slammed into by a mini van that is being
Speaker 1: driven by a man by the name of Armanio a
Speaker 1: Yosef Ermanio Josef who is actually a Haitian immigrant, even
Speaker 1: though that sounds like a very Latin name, and is killed.
Speaker 1: In fact, the bus, the bus is flipped, this eleven
Speaker 1: year old is ejected.
Speaker 2: There were fifty.
Speaker 1: Two students on board, twenty were injured, and this eleven
Speaker 1: year old Aiden Clark was killed. Joseph did not have
Speaker 1: a driver's license, and at the time he actually presented
Speaker 1: police with what looked to be a Mexican driver's license.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that was legit or not, but
Speaker 1: whatever it was, it was not legal because you can
Speaker 1: come from Mexico and drive in the US with a
Speaker 1: Mexico license, just like you and I can go to
Speaker 1: another country and drive over there. In a lot of instances,
Speaker 1: I've driven in probably seven or eight countries. I don't
Speaker 1: drive if I don't have to, but some like Ireland,
Speaker 1: you're gonna want to drive because the bust thing is just, oh,
Speaker 1: it's a whole thing. I've driven, I've driven in multiple
Speaker 1: other countries and that's how it works, and that's fine.
Speaker 1: But whatever he presented wasn't up to snuff, and they
Speaker 1: just went through a trial and.
Speaker 2: He had deviated from his lane. There was there was.
Speaker 2: I believe he said that the son was in his eyes.
Speaker 1: But when they did the reconstruction and figured out where
Speaker 1: the sun was, I don't know that they necessarily believed him.
Speaker 1: The jury didn't believe them, and they adjudicated that case.
Speaker 1: And what was crazy is the father of the eleven
Speaker 1: year old. I guess the wife is standing there, held
Speaker 1: a press conference, and.
Speaker 2: I don't know. I'll tell you what.
Speaker 1: When we do stories where somebody's killed, generally it's in
Speaker 1: a much more egregious manner where I really this stuff
Speaker 1: really sticks with me, like the strength that it takes
Speaker 1: or a family to say I forgive you at a
Speaker 1: sentencing for somebody who murdered their loved one. I don't
Speaker 1: know that I possess that grace. I'll tell you, I
Speaker 1: don't know if I could ever be that person. And
Speaker 1: if you are that person, God bless you. Because also
Speaker 1: I understand that's about helping you move on. And so
Speaker 1: I understand to the extent that I can that it's
Speaker 1: going to be very emotional watching any of the discussion,
Speaker 1: any of the proceedings, the things that happen in and
Speaker 1: around you when you are the family of the victim.
Speaker 1: It's why when we get into a lot of like
Speaker 1: the you know, the riotous behavior that you're after a
Speaker 1: police interaction where you know, hands up, don't shoot, right,
Speaker 1: I still don't come out and really get in on
Speaker 1: the parents because I understand that they're not for the
Speaker 1: most part, they're being driven by emotion. And I can
Speaker 1: understand that I did not expect, though, what I heard
Speaker 1: yesterday by the father of Aiden Clark. I'm gonna play
Speaker 1: this audio for you, and uh while I'll tell you
Speaker 1: which I think.
Speaker 9: Here.
Speaker 2: Here is the audio.
Speaker 14: My son Aiden Clark was killed by a sixty year
Speaker 14: old white man.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna replay this first part. I just want to
Speaker 1: make sure that you can hear it the very firstly.
Speaker 1: I listened to what he says.
Speaker 14: Listened, my son, Aiden Clark was killed by a sixty
Speaker 14: year old white man. But I bet you never thought
Speaker 14: anyone would ever say something so blunt. But if that
Speaker 14: guy killed my eleven year old son, the incessant group
Speaker 14: of hates viewing people would leave us alone. The last
Speaker 14: thing that we need is to have the worst day
Speaker 14: of our lives violently and constantly shoved in our faces.
Speaker 14: But even that's not good enough for them. They take
Speaker 14: it one step further. They make it seem as though
Speaker 14: our wonderful Aiden appreciates your hate, that we should follow
Speaker 14: their hate, and look what you've done to us. We
Speaker 14: have to get up here and beg them to stop
Speaker 14: using Aiden as a political tool is to say the
Speaker 14: least reprehensible for any political purpose. Speaking of Morley, bankrupt
Speaker 14: politicians Bernie Moreno, Chip Roy jd Vance, and Donald Trump.
Speaker 14: They've spoke in my son's name and use his death
Speaker 14: for political gain. This needs to.
Speaker 2: Stop now, all right. So look, here's the deal.
Speaker 1: I get the part where because there is there's a
Speaker 1: bigger discussion that your son is a part of.
Speaker 10: That.
Speaker 1: Having that, having to see it in the news cycle
Speaker 1: every day, I understand why why.
Speaker 2: People wouldn't want that.
Speaker 1: But to decide that the folks who are bringing it
Speaker 1: up are all doing it purely for political reasons without
Speaker 1: recognizing that a lot of people who see this case
Speaker 1: and they see what happened, the thought that permeates their mother.
Speaker 2: There's two thoughts that they think about. One is.
Speaker 1: I have kids or I have you know, I drive
Speaker 1: that road or I live in this community and this
Speaker 1: thing happened, and then the couple that thought with had
Speaker 1: they've never decided that they were just going to start,
Speaker 1: you know, moving all of these folks. And some of
Speaker 1: it was the government moved them, and then others was
Speaker 1: people heard that a lot of Haitians were moving here
Speaker 1: and there was possibly jobs, and so they themselves self relocated.
Speaker 2: So it's a little bit of both. You would look at.
Speaker 1: That and you would think, not only do I have
Speaker 1: family or friends or loved ones or I myself or
Speaker 1: am in this area, but also if that program wasn't
Speaker 1: going on, mathematically, this likely wouldn't have happened, right because
Speaker 1: the person, the individual just wouldn't have been there. And
Speaker 1: the individual is it forget where they come from. They're
Speaker 1: driving around with no driver's license. Another thing that wouldn't
Speaker 1: have happened had that individual not been given the opportunity
Speaker 1: to come to that community.
Speaker 2: That's not a political football.
Speaker 1: That's people looking at what's going on around them and
Speaker 1: processing it through their own thoughts. But I, and and
Speaker 1: and people could say this guy, this guy should be angry.
Speaker 2: I you can say that again.
Speaker 1: I don't know how they're going to deal with it,
Speaker 1: but I'm flabbergasted. If there's not a political reason why,
Speaker 1: he's why he even said that, because it now it's
Speaker 1: now again in the news cycle. Go google Aiden Clark,
Speaker 1: and if you do and click the news tab, there's
Speaker 1: one hundred new two stories about the thing he said.
Speaker 1: So if you're trying to not have it in the
Speaker 1: news cycle, you just created another news cycle. And that's
Speaker 1: where we find ourselves. All right, let me get back
Speaker 1: to the debate. I had mentioned obviously that you know,
Speaker 1: she had Gomblain had hit all of the attack points,
Speaker 1: with the exception of Charlottesville.
Speaker 2: But fear not, we will get there.
Speaker 8: Let's remember, well, hold on, let's remember Charlottesville, where there
Speaker 8: was a mob of people carrying tiki torches spewing anti
Speaker 8: Semitic hate. And what did the president then at the
Speaker 8: time say, there were fine people on each side.
Speaker 1: Rosser, you let you clipped off again, you clipped off
Speaker 1: the ABC News correction here or explainer if there was none.
Speaker 1: Obviously there was none. So again, she hit all of
Speaker 1: the high points, the big talking points, and I was
Speaker 1: worried she was going to leave it out.
Speaker 2: Of course she did not.
Speaker 8: Donald Trump left us.
Speaker 2: Oh, and then January.
Speaker 8: Sixth, Donald Trump left us the worst attack on our
Speaker 8: democracy since the Civil War. Huh, we're Donald Trump left
Speaker 8: us the worst attack on our democracy.
Speaker 2: Okay, January sixth, Okay, all right, all right, all right.
Speaker 1: So the span here is, you know what happened here
Speaker 1: three years ago since the Civil War to what happened
Speaker 1: in the eighteen seventies. So nothing happened in between the
Speaker 1: eighteen seventies and a few years ago. Look at your
Speaker 1: calendar today, go look at it right now.
Speaker 8: Let's turn the page on this. Let's not go back.
Speaker 8: Let's chart a course for the future and not go
Speaker 8: backwards to the past.
Speaker 7: Let me just follow up here.
Speaker 4: It was a different term, and it was a term
Speaker 4: that related to energy, because they have destroyed our energy business.
Speaker 4: That was where bloodbath was also on Charlottesville. That story
Speaker 4: has been, as you would say, debunked. Laura Ingram, Sean Hannityes,
Speaker 4: all of these people, they covered it. If they go
Speaker 4: an extra sentence, they will see it was perfect. It
Speaker 4: was debunked in almost every newspaper. But they still bring
Speaker 4: it up, just like they bring twenty twenty five up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and he's right, He's absolutely right. And the reason
Speaker 1: that they keep here's how you do. Here's how they
Speaker 1: wouldn't keep bringing it up. They would get their handslap,
Speaker 1: you know, metaphorically when they brought it up, and they
Speaker 1: would get their handslap because they're in an environment where
Speaker 1: the hosts of the environment, the moderators have shown a
Speaker 1: willingness to correct or add context where they think appropriate.
Speaker 1: And again the bloodbath thing, the January sixth, or more
Speaker 1: so the Charlottesville thing, they didn't do it all right.
Speaker 1: More audio, A lot of Trump stuff coming up. Hang on,
Speaker 1: sure get your ticket for our Bourbon Bourbon sample and
Speaker 1: taste in event tomorrow. We had some really good stuff
Speaker 1: and it's happening in the Triangle. Triad did theirs last night.
Speaker 1: We had fun with that, and I'm just excited I
Speaker 1: get to do it twice in a week.
Speaker 2: I like bourbon.
Speaker 4: Boy.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna lie especially. I like you unique ones
Speaker 1: so and I know a lot of you do too,
Speaker 1: because I've seen you in the ABC store stock in
Speaker 1: the aisles as I do. Like you're gonna find some
Speaker 1: magical thing hidden behind another thing. A lot of times
Speaker 1: I have it behind the counter. You can ask or well,
Speaker 1: you know what, I can't give up my secrets. I've
Speaker 1: got a couple other ways, but one of the easiest
Speaker 1: ways to get a hold of some stuff maybe you
Speaker 1: haven't tried, is to come to our event tomorrow night.
Speaker 1: Details and you know, you get your tickets online late.
Speaker 1: You have tweeted out if you just scroll down, I
Speaker 1: think it's like two or three tweets deep at Casey
Speaker 1: on the radio, or if you get to one o
Speaker 1: six one FM talk dot com scroll down on the
Speaker 1: left side, you'll see in the third column a blue logo,
Speaker 1: and that is for the for the event. Seward's glass
Speaker 1: is what it's called Bourbon Experience. So do it, do it.
Speaker 1: I'll be there I Boston. Paul's coming, so get there
Speaker 1: early before all the bourbon's gone. Now we'll have enough.
Speaker 1: Well we'll keep him at bay. But yeah, don't miss
Speaker 1: this event and we'll have a grand old time. Okay,
Speaker 1: all right, let me grab a call and then back
Speaker 1: to audio Bob.
Speaker 4: What's up Hika here?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I can hear you, sir.
Speaker 15: See did you hear me?
Speaker 10: Yep?
Speaker 15: Okay, I'll tell you ros and I miss lady.
Speaker 1: Feld Now I can't hear you, sir. Now you're now
Speaker 1: your phone's chopping out. So okay, well, nope, it's chopping.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna put you back on hold and we'll just
Speaker 1: give you a little We'll giving you just a couple
Speaker 1: of minutes to stew sir. I'm gonna play some audio
Speaker 1: and then we'll come back. You're probably just in a
Speaker 1: dead spot. You're probably I don't know why it is,
Speaker 1: but yesterday I found the sweetest spot of me not
Speaker 1: having service, but on Eastchester for some reason, Uh, in
Speaker 1: high Point. We need another tower, if only to appease
Speaker 1: me when I'm when I'm over in the triad. All right,
Speaker 1: So back to this, I tell you there was one
Speaker 1: there was one other line that I really cut up
Speaker 1: over and that Trump throughout, and it had to do
Speaker 1: with it.
Speaker 4: Now you have millions of people dead, and it's only
Speaker 4: getting worse, and it could lead to World War three.
Speaker 4: Don't kid yourself, David. We're playing with world War three,
Speaker 4: and we have a president that we don't even know
Speaker 4: if he's where is our president? We don't even know
Speaker 4: if he's a president, and just a clarify threw him
Speaker 4: out of a campaign like a dog. We don't even
Speaker 4: know is he a president. But we have a president
Speaker 4: that doesn't know he's alive.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, it's just such a weird comp we have
Speaker 1: a president that doesn't know he's alive. Well then how
Speaker 1: would but how but how would you have conscious thought
Speaker 1: if you were to? I don't, but I laughed because
Speaker 1: a little bit of child a little childish that's okay,
Speaker 1: that's okay. But that's not the one that set me
Speaker 1: off the most. She was shortly thereafter. And remember this
Speaker 1: was this was the cross talk moment that we were
Speaker 1: all discussing when it came to Kamala Harris, because she
Speaker 1: had used it effectively in previous speeches, and that is
Speaker 1: to do the how dare you interrupt a woman talking?
Speaker 2: Thing? But she didn't get to.
Speaker 4: Because this policies like she was big on defund the
Speaker 4: police in Minnesota. She went out, I'm talking now, if
Speaker 4: you don't mind, please, does that sound familiar?
Speaker 10: Now?
Speaker 1: Ross, do you think that's too childish of him to
Speaker 1: hit or do you think that that was an appropriate
Speaker 1: way to deflect what he knew was coming.
Speaker 2: That's the debate I saw yesterday.
Speaker 5: I mean she was waiting to do it, so yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because I saw people go, oh, that was just
Speaker 1: low of him, And I'm like she was going to
Speaker 1: do it to him at some point, like if everyone
Speaker 1: knew it was going to happen, And arguably that's the
Speaker 1: most effective way to deflect it.
Speaker 5: I think it would. If I had the nitpick, I
Speaker 5: would say it's like I probably wouldn't have added that
Speaker 5: does that sound familiar, dude?
Speaker 2: That's the part. I think.
Speaker 1: That's the part I think shows that they knew.
Speaker 2: He's saying, I know you were going to do this.
Speaker 5: To me, like if you're gonna I'm just saying like
Speaker 5: from from the way it translates, you could say that
Speaker 5: part of it sounds a little like you're talking down, yeah,
Speaker 5: Whereas I think it comes down to it's like, you know,
Speaker 5: I think I think it would have had more power
Speaker 5: if he just said the first part.
Speaker 1: But I think I agree with you based on who's
Speaker 1: hearing it. I think if somebody's hearing it who is
Speaker 1: fully re in on why he's saying it, right, then
Speaker 1: his version is the right version. But if you're just
Speaker 1: watching and you don't know that, then yeah, I think
Speaker 1: it may be come across.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I'll split the baby here.
Speaker 1: All right, all Right, we're gonna try Bob again, all right,
Speaker 1: Rock and roll, Bob, all right, fire, start talking, sergo
Speaker 1: right ahead.
Speaker 2: You sound a lot better.
Speaker 15: Okay, let's try this again. It was just a friend
Speaker 15: of mine Springfield, Ohio sent me a copy of a
Speaker 15: nine one one report and made it August twenty sixth,
Speaker 15: and it has to do with two males, two females,
Speaker 15: all Haitian, stealing four keeth.
Speaker 4: And then amazing that you.
Speaker 15: Had Eric driving a newer Toyota and they didn't get
Speaker 15: a picture of the license plate or anything, so they
Speaker 15: pretty much dropped it.
Speaker 1: So yeah, and again they they indicated that while there
Speaker 1: may be a nine to one to one log of this,
Speaker 1: they don't handle reports of lost pets. That's why when
Speaker 1: you just say, oh, it's been debunked because the city
Speaker 1: manager said it's debunked, you have to then weigh the
Speaker 1: credibility the city manager, and you should present and thanks
Speaker 1: for the caller, Bob to your audience as such, be like, look,
Speaker 1: this is what the city manager says, but here's what
Speaker 1: a call log says. And it used to be journalistic.
Speaker 1: And you know, I don't want to say integrity because
Speaker 1: you almost can't use that damn word anymore, but intellectual
Speaker 1: curiosity among journalists would have picked up on that. When
Speaker 1: I was writing news stories, I would have presented it
Speaker 1: that way. In fact, I still remember the name of
Speaker 1: the city manager, the main city manager that I dealt with.
Speaker 2: His name was Eric Sorenson.
Speaker 1: Eric Sorenson was He was a decidedly liberal dude, but
Speaker 1: he was reasonable to deal with, and so there were
Speaker 1: many instances though where I felt that he was he
Speaker 1: was definitely spinning stuff, and I wrote stories about here's
Speaker 1: what the city manager said, and here's what this person said,
Speaker 1: and then I would leave it up to my audience
Speaker 1: to base their credibility on it and provide the many
Speaker 1: facts that I could, because that's how I understood it
Speaker 1: was supposed to work. And apparently I was wrong, and
Speaker 1: that's why I never made it on the news side.
Speaker 1: And I have to do this want wat but I
Speaker 1: get to drink bourbon twice in.
Speaker 2: A week and he does different. Well, hold on sorry,
Speaker 2: wrong button. So then it was on too.
Speaker 1: What is one of the things I think most people
Speaker 1: thought that Trump should have spent a lot of time on.
Speaker 1: And I understand he's at the women the moderator, but
Speaker 1: that was the Afghan withdraw. Remember they just had this
Speaker 1: big scandal over there at Arlington, which you want to
Speaker 1: talk about debunked, look it up. Permissions were given, Hypocrisy
Speaker 1: was rampant. You had John McCain's son who's out whining
Speaker 1: about it, even though his dad filmed a literal section
Speaker 1: sixty a campaign ad and they always got thumbs up.
Speaker 1: And I'm like, yeah, so to the gold Star families.
Speaker 1: The talking point though, is Trump was invited there. It
Speaker 1: wasn't his event, and Kamala and Biden were invited, and
Speaker 1: Biden was in Delaware. Shockingly, Kamala was at the VP
Speaker 1: residence at Naval Observatory and she didn't show up. They
Speaker 1: I don't know that they even said no. I think
Speaker 1: that she just didn't show up. Now, to be fair,
Speaker 1: driving four miles in DC traffic is pain, I.
Speaker 2: Agree, but you kind of you get to drive, you get.
Speaker 1: A little motorcate thing going on, show up, and you
Speaker 1: know why they didn't show.
Speaker 4: Up because the Taliban was doing the killing. That's the
Speaker 4: fighting for.
Speaker 2: You, all right.
Speaker 1: So this part of it, it was a little deeper,
Speaker 1: and basically she was criticizing him because he negotiated with
Speaker 1: the Taliban instead of the transition Afghan government the reason.
Speaker 2: Obviously he'll explain it. He'll explain one of the reasons.
Speaker 1: But one of the reasons is, for all practical purposes,
Speaker 1: the transitionary Government Afghanistan wasn't the one running Afghanistan. You know,
Speaker 1: that's like negotiating with one of these uh That's like
Speaker 1: negotiating with a exiled leader who's living in another country
Speaker 1: because it's been taken over by coup and thinking that
Speaker 1: you're accomplishing negotiations with that country for all practical purposes.
Speaker 2: That's what the Taliban had done.
Speaker 4: Because the Taliban was doing the killing. That's the fighting
Speaker 4: force within Afghanistan. They don't bother doing that because you know,
Speaker 4: they deal with the wrong people all the time. But
Speaker 4: I got involved, and Abdul is the head of the Taliban.
Speaker 4: He is still the head of the Taliban, and I
Speaker 4: told Abdul, don't do it anymore. You do it anymore,
Speaker 4: you're gonna have problems. And he said, why do you
Speaker 4: send me a picture of my house? I said, you're
Speaker 4: going to have to figure that out, Abduel. And for
Speaker 4: eighteen months we had nobody killed. We did have an
Speaker 4: agreement negotiated by Mike Pompeo was a very good agreement.
Speaker 4: The reason it was good it was we were getting out.
Speaker 4: We would have been out faster than them, but we
Speaker 4: wouldn't have lost the soldiers, we wouldn't have left many
Speaker 4: Americans behind, and we wouldn't have left we wouldn't have
Speaker 4: left eighty five billion dollars worth of brand new, beautiful
Speaker 4: military equipment behind. And just to finish, they blew it.
Speaker 4: The agreement said you have to do this, this, and
Speaker 4: they didn't do it. They didn't do it. The agreement
Speaker 4: was terminated by us because they didn't do what they
Speaker 4: were supposed to do. And these people did the I'm
Speaker 4: sure you do with the draw and in my opinion,
Speaker 4: the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country.
Speaker 4: And by the way, that's why Russia attacked Ukraine because
Speaker 4: they saw how incompetent she and her boss are.
Speaker 1: All right, so speculation on their correction, and the most
Speaker 1: embarrassing moment in America would be the embrace of crocs
Speaker 1: and but more importantly, all right, tongue in cheek. But
Speaker 1: more importantly, that's one of the strongest points that Trump has,
Speaker 1: because it is indisputable that for eighteen months US soldiers
Speaker 1: didn't get into engagements that resulted in US casualties with Taliban.
Speaker 1: There was some stuff but was very minor, was very spotty.
Speaker 1: That's not a coincidence. And I and that's exactly why
Speaker 1: ABC wants to move on. But we're gonna move on
Speaker 1: real quick. To the weather with Ray stagic so he
Speaker 1: can scare any of you planning to go to Louisiana today,
Speaker 1: so don't.
Speaker 11: Yeah, Louisiana looks like close to the Louisiana close to
Speaker 11: Morgan City, west to New Orleans is where the center
Speaker 11: will come on shore later today of France. Scene could
Speaker 11: be a cat to storm right now. Cat one with
Speaker 11: ninety mile per hour winds impacts here. A guy that's
Speaker 11: trying to say it throws some fringe moisture into the
Speaker 11: form of showers Friday night Saturday through the region. Best
Speaker 11: chance to the west, but for the most part limited sunshine,
Speaker 11: trying to get through something high level overcast here this morning,
Speaker 11: low to mid eighties this afternoon, and probably more sun
Speaker 11: as I'm seeing more clearing west of US Marshall sun
Speaker 11: tomorrow upper seventies, low eighties, and that chance of showers
Speaker 11: with upper seventies on Friday and an east breeze, and
Speaker 11: that shower threat continues into the weekend for Friday night
Speaker 11: and Saturday, maybe even a thunderstorm, especially further west you go.
Speaker 11: The heaviest rain is going to be out across parts
Speaker 11: of Alabama and at the Mississippi and Louisiana and working
Speaker 11: north in Arkansas, central and western Tennessee. If you're traveling
Speaker 11: in the next couple of days. Now there is a
Speaker 11: second area of low pressure or another one now that
Speaker 11: Hurricane Center does have highlighted off the Carolina coast next
Speaker 11: week that could develop into a subtropical or tropical load.
Speaker 11: That one right now looks to bring maybe a better
Speaker 11: chance of some rain in here, maybe sometime Tuesday into Wednesday.
Speaker 11: So that would be something that we'll get to talk
Speaker 11: about as we get through the coming days and next week.
Speaker 11: But right now does look like most of the impacts,
Speaker 11: if not all of them from Francine stay to the
Speaker 11: west of US, and then we'll watch that second system
Speaker 11: off the coast that could impact there.
Speaker 1: All right, thank you, sir, appreciate it. With schat tomorrow
Speaker 1: and Jeff Bellinger's next hang.
Speaker 16: On, Actually, Casey, the big story is the inflation data
Speaker 16: just came out at eight thirty this morning. The headline
Speaker 16: consumer Price Index was up two tens percent last month.
Speaker 16: That was in line with expectations, but the core CPI,
Speaker 16: which excludes volatile energy and food prices, rose three tenths percent.
Speaker 16: It was a bigger than expected gain the year over
Speaker 16: year increase, and the core was three point two percent.
Speaker 16: All of this will feed into the Federal Reserves interest
Speaker 16: rate decision one week from today, and it likely lessens
Speaker 16: the chances of a half point interest rate reduction. A
Speaker 16: quarter point is still widely expected. So right now, the
Speaker 16: futures are lower across the board. S and P futures
Speaker 16: are down fifteen, Nasdaq futures are down thirty one, and
Speaker 16: the Dow futures down one hundred and ninety three points
Speaker 16: this hour.
Speaker 1: Casey, all right, no debate tomorrow, so we'll try to
Speaker 1: be better. Okay, okay, sounds going to talk to Yeah,
Speaker 1: Thank goodness for all of our sanity. Jeff Bellinger there
Speaker 1: from Bloomberg News. I just want to play. I want
Speaker 1: to finish the Afghanistan section. I'm not going to get
Speaker 1: to the closing statements, but because I think it's important,
Speaker 1: I think that.
Speaker 2: That eighteen I think that eighteen month thing is a.
Speaker 1: Big deal, and however you want to slice it, for
Speaker 1: whatever reason, that is an anomaly with everything that we
Speaker 1: had done with the Taliban, and you're going to be
Speaker 1: hard pressed to convince me that it wasn't because even
Speaker 1: if they thought that Trump was insane and would nuke them,
Speaker 1: I don't care when as it pertains to the Taliban,
Speaker 1: whatever they got to get through their uh through their
Speaker 1: little throwback runt heads to stop shooting at our true
Speaker 1: I'm okay with so throwing that number out there, I
Speaker 1: think is good, and the continuation of it I also
Speaker 1: think is good because it forced Kamla to answer the question,
Speaker 1: let's play the rest of the Trump I'm.
Speaker 4: A different kind of a person. I fired most of
Speaker 4: those people, not so.
Speaker 2: Great generals and cabinet members or a bad job.
Speaker 4: I fired them. They never fired one person. They didn't
Speaker 4: fire anybody having to do with Afghanistan and the Taliban
Speaker 4: and the thirteen people who's who's were just killed viciously
Speaker 4: and violently killed, and I got to know the parents
Speaker 4: and the family. They didn't fire. They should have fired
Speaker 4: all those generals, all those top people, because that was
Speaker 4: one of the most incompetently handled situations anybody has ever seen.
Speaker 4: So when somebody he does a badge up, I fire him.
Speaker 1: All right, And you know what, maybe you don't fire
Speaker 1: every single general. But here's the deal. It's not about that,
Speaker 1: just that individual incident. It's about accountability. And that is
Speaker 1: something that has come to our attention in so many
Speaker 1: different ways, from Lois Learner not anything happening to her,
Speaker 1: Peter Struck and his girlfriend getting paid a million and
Speaker 1: a half dollars because their tweets got out there or
Speaker 1: their texts got out there, to the Secret Service stuff.
Speaker 2: It stacks up.
Speaker 1: And every time people look at it and go, man,
Speaker 1: if I screwed up that bad at work, you think
Speaker 1: the guy who just down in Atlanta, who made a
Speaker 1: jet drive under another jet yesterday on the taxiway, ripping
Speaker 1: the tail off, you think that person's not going to
Speaker 1: have some repercussions.
Speaker 2: They tried to do it.
Speaker 1: They tried to do what our state auditor did with jets,
Speaker 1: but it forced Kamala to answer this question.
Speaker 2: And I think this is an important thing.
Speaker 4: I'll tell you.
Speaker 8: I agreed with President Biden's decision to pull out of Afghanistan.
Speaker 8: For presidents said they would, and Joe Biden did.
Speaker 1: That was what asked if she has any regrets about it.
Speaker 1: It's a semi non answer, but it's still an answer,
Speaker 1: and it's not a good one. She has to be
Speaker 1: willing to and they've already shown that they are. To
Speaker 1: throw them under the bus a little here because normal
Speaker 1: people think that that was screwed up.