Speaker 1: All right, and we are back, and we are joined
Speaker 1: by doctor Jane Ruby of doctor janeeruby dot com. She
Speaker 1: has a wealth of information that she is ready to
Speaker 1: share with us about what's going on with the FDA,
Speaker 1: what's going on with r f K and DJT so
Speaker 1: lots of acronyms, but even more information. Thank you for
Speaker 1: joining us, doctor Ruby.
Speaker 2: Hi, Travis, it's so good to be with you. I'm
Speaker 2: really you've done such a great job. I just want
Speaker 2: to start out by saying, I'm sure your dad is
Speaker 2: super proud, well, thanks, which is also helping his healing.
Speaker 2: He's an incredible man. Yes, so give him my love
Speaker 2: and my prayers to him and your mom and yep,
Speaker 2: you know, God is great, so he's gonna I'm sure
Speaker 2: he's gonna be back soon.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, Thank you so much.
Speaker 2: I'm honored to join you, yep, and be on the show.
Speaker 2: And yeah, share some time with you guys again.
Speaker 1: It's a pleasure to have you on. And I actually
Speaker 1: have a question from my dad. I spoke to him
Speaker 1: briefly during the previous break. He wants to know what's
Speaker 1: a alternative to statins. The hospital has been pushing that
Speaker 1: on him since the whole ordeal, and you know, they
Speaker 1: have a long list of side effects that are not great.
Speaker 2: To say the least, they sure are and you know
Speaker 2: before that reminds me of something, Travis. Before I go further,
Speaker 2: I just want your audience to know that whatever I
Speaker 2: present or talk about is not intended to be medical advice.
Speaker 2: I have to give that. My attorneys want me to
Speaker 2: give that legal disclaimer. It is for information only. Always
Speaker 2: check with your own trusted I say trusted because they're
Speaker 2: not all trustworthy healthcare professional. And this is also not
Speaker 2: medical advice for David, although I would probably because of
Speaker 2: our relationship, privately talk to him in more depth about
Speaker 2: my observations and my expertise. But I think for the
Speaker 2: general public, I have a great concern about statins in
Speaker 2: general as a class of drugs. Your right to be concerned,
Speaker 2: and it's mostly because it is very well known now
Speaker 2: to be damaging to the sensory motor system. People often
Speaker 2: develop difficulty walking, and if that goes on, if they
Speaker 2: stay on the drug long enough, Travis and these symptoms,
Speaker 2: they're living through, these symptoms, those things will become prominent.
Speaker 2: Eventually most people clear up from them literally within twenty
Speaker 2: four to forty eight hours of stopping those drugs. Again,
Speaker 2: your father got caught up in a nightmare that we
Speaker 2: all pray to God, you know, we don't and that
Speaker 2: if we do that, God, you know, stands by us
Speaker 2: all the way through. And that is the allopath. He
Speaker 2: had no choice. If I took my arm, I'd have
Speaker 2: to go in myself. Today, certain things are unavoidable, and
Speaker 2: so when you get into that world, you are pushed
Speaker 2: into that whole allopathic Rockefeller medicine, you know, the pharmaceuticals
Speaker 2: and all that. So you're all your family's wise to
Speaker 2: be cautious about navigating that again. And I don't know
Speaker 2: the whole picture. So I'm going to talk in generalities
Speaker 2: about the statins. Most people, the whole thing about high cholesterol,
Speaker 2: which is generally the target when doctors talk to you
Speaker 2: about statons. Oh, we've got to get it down. That down,
Speaker 2: that threshold, you know, where they want it or where
Speaker 2: they want it under, is actually a moving goalpost. It
Speaker 2: is really a tool used by corrupt agencies like the
Speaker 2: American Heart Association. Those associations were started by the Rockefeller
Speaker 2: medicine men precisely to do what they're doing, which is
Speaker 2: to bolster the pharmaceutical industry to prop up, you know,
Speaker 2: drugs and things like that, because people would go to
Speaker 2: them and say, well, the pharma company and my doctor
Speaker 2: want says, what is your thought as the American Oh, yes,
Speaker 2: you've got to do it and whatever. They set the
Speaker 2: threshold for high cholesterol at a certain number, and if
Speaker 2: you really look through the history of that, it has
Speaker 2: moved around probably in the general sense. And again for
Speaker 2: your audience, just reminder, I am a cardiac practitioner worked
Speaker 2: in the hospitals in ICUs for over fifteen years directly
Speaker 2: taking care of patients. Nps do not take direction or
Speaker 2: have need co signature from physicians, and they have full
Speaker 2: prescriptive privileges even into narcotics. So I just want to
Speaker 2: lay that foundation that I'm talking from that experience, and
Speaker 2: then I went into teaching at the university level, then
Speaker 2: into the pharmat industry for twenty years where I was
Speaker 2: in drug development. So I just want to kind of
Speaker 2: lay that out. So the whole thing about the statins
Speaker 2: and cholesterol, I don't believe there really is a solid
Speaker 2: case for keeping your cholesterol below a certain level. In fact,
Speaker 2: it's actually dangerous your brain is covered in healthy fats,
Speaker 2: fat covering. It needs sugar for function, metabolic function, it
Speaker 2: needs the fat for a lot of other functions and protection.
Speaker 2: So we don't want cholesterol to be you know, to
Speaker 2: be dampened down. And as one cardiologist told me at
Speaker 2: my alma mater, the University of Rochester, he said, you'd
Speaker 2: you'd really and he was honest. He said, you'd really
Speaker 2: have to live, you know, to be like one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty for any of these high cholesterols to make
Speaker 2: a difference. So a lot of times that suggests that
Speaker 2: the statins are not necessary. I believe the allopathic system
Speaker 2: is created the concern. They've created the disease of hypercholesterolemia.
Speaker 2: And of course then now the next step is to
Speaker 2: justify these drugs that have really serious and sometimes and
Speaker 2: then eventually, I'm not going to say sometimes, but eventually
Speaker 2: they will become permanent symptoms of difficulty motor skills, feeling
Speaker 2: sensory feeling pain when you need to, like a burning
Speaker 2: stove or something like that. So I do I do
Speaker 2: not recommend them. And I think that one of the
Speaker 2: things I might tell your dad later on is have
Speaker 2: a deeper discussion about let's find a natural pathic cardiologist
Speaker 2: or cardiology specialist who would be able to come up
Speaker 2: with more natural ways, which is really should really be
Speaker 2: the first approach. Yeah, because no one's gonna no one
Speaker 2: is going to drop dead within a few days of
Speaker 2: a high cholesterol. Yes, that was the point of Yeah,
Speaker 2: so anyway, I didn't want to prattle on, but that
Speaker 2: is really my take on those drugs. And happy to
Speaker 2: give him more of my opinion, you know when we
Speaker 2: speak privately if he needs that.
Speaker 1: Well, thank you so much for that, doctor Ruienne. Again,
Speaker 1: it is important to clarify that these are all this
Speaker 1: is not medical advice. The government feels very very strongly
Speaker 1: about when you give medical advice. They will come down
Speaker 1: on you, yes, with the wrath the wrath of God
Speaker 1: if they feel you are dispensing it. So you have
Speaker 1: to make that very clear. They have, yes, good point.
Speaker 2: They want control over the entire terrain that they don't
Speaker 2: they don't that they don't own that, so we can
Speaker 2: talk about that later.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And as you said, the whole medical industry is
Speaker 1: interwoven with these other different agencies and corporations that have
Speaker 1: been built up to bolster the narrative whatever it is
Speaker 1: that they're selling you, there's another doctor that you can
Speaker 1: go to that will reinforce that narrative. And they're all
Speaker 1: sort of paid by the same corporations at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, or getting their money from the same
Speaker 1: funding sources. But let's let's move on to the FDA.
Speaker 1: You said you had a lot of news about what's
Speaker 1: going on there, and right before you came on, I
Speaker 1: was actually reading about how the HHS is going to
Speaker 1: stop recommending the COVID shots for children and pregnant women,
Speaker 1: which I found to be a hopeful sign. But also,
Speaker 1: you know, it's still speculative on whether they're what they're
Speaker 1: really going to do in terms of that, but I
Speaker 1: think that's the minimum that should be done. Not only
Speaker 1: should they stop recommending it. Personally, I think they should
Speaker 1: just get rid of it, not just for women and children,
Speaker 1: but for everyone.
Speaker 2: I totally agree with you. You've opened up a couple
Speaker 2: of really important areas, so if I could go through them,
Speaker 2: I would love that. Please, let's talk about this HHS.
Speaker 2: Supposedly there's this, like you said, this notice put out
Speaker 2: a lot of there's a chorus. I call it the chorus,
Speaker 2: and that is that all of a sudden, when there's
Speaker 2: a messaging that they want to get out, you see
Speaker 2: the usual suspects come out, and those could be organizations
Speaker 2: in association with some frontline doctors who we know now
Speaker 2: many of them are compromised. Many of them I'm not
Speaker 2: going to name names, but I know your Dad's talked
Speaker 2: about it on the show many times. Many of the
Speaker 2: people that were originally either we're giving good, good information
Speaker 2: to the public and then sort of changed, or they
Speaker 2: were always there as a plant, are part of the chorus.
Speaker 2: So I always know when they all come together and
Speaker 2: they're saying something that there's an issue, there's a concern,
Speaker 2: I should keep my antenna up. But let me just
Speaker 2: say to you that to the public, to your audience,
Speaker 2: be careful with words like can, considering, recommending, looking into,
Speaker 2: holding a hearing, developing a task force. These are all
Speaker 2: code words for we're not going to do anything. We're
Speaker 2: going to placate you. It's a red hearing. Now, what
Speaker 2: I feel about the whole AHHS issue, I do think
Speaker 2: it's a red hearing. To be honest with you, they
Speaker 2: should have stopped it from day one. They're saying that
Speaker 2: they want to recommend that it be removed from the
Speaker 2: childhood schedule. I think Travis people need to remember, and
Speaker 2: this is all stuff they can verify by going and
Speaker 2: doing some of their own backup research to vet. What
Speaker 2: I'm saying is that you have to understand that Health
Speaker 2: and Human Services is the umbrella. I don't think people
Speaker 2: understand how much power, at least theoretically Robert F. Kennedy
Speaker 2: Junior now has, and that the position of AHHS Secretary has.
Speaker 2: It is over all health agency. So let me go
Speaker 2: through them really quick. FDA, which is hundreds of institute,
Speaker 2: it's the National Institute's plural of Health CMS, which is
Speaker 2: the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare, which is the there's
Speaker 2: so much power that they have just that one little agency,
Speaker 2: I say, FDA, CDC. So for a statement to come out,
Speaker 2: it's disingenuous in my opinion, for a statement to come
Speaker 2: out saying, hey, the HHS is going to recommend recommend,
Speaker 2: they should be demanding right that it be immediately removed,
Speaker 2: immediately pulled off. So that's one one point. So I
Speaker 2: think it's totally a red herring. We're in an information war,
Speaker 2: and what does that mean that means you're going to
Speaker 2: be lied to, you're going to be led astray, you're
Speaker 2: going to be thrown red meat, You're going to be
Speaker 2: shown red hearings or red herring. Is something to get
Speaker 2: you to pay attention. The state chemtrail bands apparently am
Speaker 2: now well known for saying that they're all shams. Why
Speaker 2: are they shams? Because there's there's not just Title fifty
Speaker 2: sub section fifteen twenty and fifteen twenty one exemptions clause
Speaker 2: that allows the Feds to keep doing this over any
Speaker 2: state ban. But in the meantime, I've checked with Catherine Watt.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure if you guys have interviewed her, but
Speaker 2: she's a legal analyst expert who who puts toget it's
Speaker 2: not her opinion. She puts together documents to show the
Speaker 2: history of the laws that Congress executive orders, things have
Speaker 2: come in that created the PREP Act, and things that
Speaker 2: allow the government to do this to us. And she
Speaker 2: has found for me numerous other laws that replay because
Speaker 2: people are coming and say no, doctor Jane, those of
Speaker 2: the Title fifty section has been repealed. Well, Travis, actually,
Speaker 2: if it's repealed, if you really look at it, Title
Speaker 2: fifty sub Section fifteen twenty was a restriction. You know,
Speaker 2: they twist it was a restriction on showering us with toxins.
Speaker 2: So technically if they repeal that, they actually are allowing it.
Speaker 2: But there was My argument was against the state bans.
Speaker 2: There is in sub section fifteen twenty one an exemption's
Speaker 2: clause with three exemptions. The first one really ties in
Speaker 2: connects right to the prep BacT, which allows really makes
Speaker 2: any restrictions moote. So what I'm saying is back to HHS,
Speaker 2: they don't have to recommend anything. They should pull it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but they're not going to pull it because many of us,
Speaker 2: you guys included, understand that this is actually being perpetrated
Speaker 2: by the very people that some of you are seeking
Speaker 2: justice from. They're actually doing it to you. So I
Speaker 2: think the HHS recommendation is you know, belooney and people
Speaker 2: will figure it out in due time and their tipping
Speaker 2: point will go, you know, we'll get to the anger level.
Speaker 1: Yeckly. I commented on this last week on the show.
Speaker 1: But we see this over and over again, and it's
Speaker 1: not just from the Trump administration, but every administration comes
Speaker 1: out and makes this bold declaration of we're going to
Speaker 1: do this, and they celebrate as if it's already a victory,
Speaker 1: it's already done, whereas it's just an idea they're going
Speaker 1: to as you just put together a task force or
Speaker 1: any other word or string of words to say that
Speaker 1: while someone's going to look into it, and it might
Speaker 1: get done down the line, maybe just maybe it might
Speaker 1: and that's generally where it ends. They celebrate as if
Speaker 1: it's already a victory, and they move on to whatever
Speaker 1: else they can distract you with, and nothing ever actually changes.
Speaker 1: And on the subject of the chemtrails, I saw that
Speaker 1: article about you know, oh state bans chemtrails, and then
Speaker 1: you know, great, good for you. But also this is
Speaker 1: seems to be a geoengineering problem, and if the state
Speaker 1: next to you doesn't ban geoengineering, doesn't ban chemtrails, it's
Speaker 1: just going to leak over. You know, the chemtrail doesn't
Speaker 1: respect your state's borderline. So this is truly a you know,
Speaker 1: global I don't want to say, you know, globalist issue,
Speaker 1: but it affects everyone globally. If one state is doing
Speaker 1: kem trails, I imagine it impacts all the states surrounding
Speaker 1: it as well. These chemicals are not going to, as
Speaker 1: I said, can find themselves to the state's borders. They're
Speaker 1: going to leak out and leach into the surrounding area.
Speaker 1: And with the you know, the wind currents, there's no
Speaker 1: telling where all of them are going to end up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's really absurd, to be honest with you, to
Speaker 2: be celebrating your state's chem trail ban, your state ban
Speaker 2: for that geographic limitation. It's we share the same air
Speaker 2: on the planet. It's not even your state to state.
Speaker 2: But you raise such a critically important point, and it
Speaker 2: actually makes it very suspect to me, Travis that a
Speaker 2: lot of the anti or free you know, clear skies type,
Speaker 2: free skies, anti chemtrail and anti geoengineering groups, none of
Speaker 2: them have aligned with me on the truth about the limitation.
Speaker 2: That makes me very concerned. Are they paid agents? Why
Speaker 2: are they attacking me personally when they can They're not
Speaker 2: addressing the issue I'm raising. Argue with me all day long.
Speaker 2: I'd love to see refutations, but they don't do that.
Speaker 2: And then you have this group, the Global Wellness Forum.
Speaker 2: Anything that starts with Global loses me. So that's this
Speaker 2: guy SAJ who hangs around with RFK Junior. It's Marlon Maples.
Speaker 2: It's ed group. And I'm sorry, but anybody who's in
Speaker 2: that group that's saying celebrate chemtrail, say chemtrail bands Florida,
Speaker 2: talk to the people of Tennessee guys, because they had
Speaker 2: a chemtrail geoengineering band for their state, which is absurd,
Speaker 2: but they did it, and they've been sprayed every bit
Speaker 2: as much or more since that time. So I'm a
Speaker 2: suspect of those groups. They either shun me or block me.
Speaker 2: They've literally blocked me on social media. Why won't they
Speaker 2: address the limitation issue? You all should be very concerned.
Speaker 2: And the legislator's Travis that put this through, they know
Speaker 2: because why they know it's not going to go through.
Speaker 2: They wouldn't have been allowed to do it if it
Speaker 2: was going to go through on any level, even the
Speaker 2: state level. But what does it do for them? It
Speaker 2: gives them great foundation their re election donations. It's Ron
Speaker 2: Johnson was the bigger picture for me. He held all
Speaker 2: those hearings and all he did was get reelected on Hey,
Speaker 2: I had hearings on COVID injury. You didn't do anything.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we see that over and over again, like you said,
Speaker 1: Ron Johnson and Trey Goudy. Trey Goudy is one of
Speaker 1: the foremost people that comes to my mind when you
Speaker 1: think of hearings and him just berating and badgering someone
Speaker 1: who definitely deserves it, but nothing ever comes of it.
Speaker 1: You know, he makes all these great points, he dresses
Speaker 1: them down, he makes them look like an idiot, and
Speaker 1: they go right back to their job in the administration
Speaker 1: and nothing changes. Trey Goudy gets to looks like look
Speaker 1: like a hero on camera, he gets to look like
Speaker 1: he's achieving something, but in reality, all it is is
Speaker 1: just you know, the bureaucrat shuffles back to his little
Speaker 1: desk and keeps pushing the papers the same way he
Speaker 1: always did.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well said you know. In Texas they tell me
Speaker 2: they've got a saying called all hat no cattle. Somebody
Speaker 2: you know, supposed to be all full, you know, but
Speaker 2: Trey Gaudy I used to call it. For the Bengazi hearings.
Speaker 2: I called them all hearings no action. Yeah you've nailed
Speaker 2: that one, yep. So yeah, yeah, a lot of sham.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the I had seen this article before and I
Speaker 1: wanted to see if you had heard anything about it,
Speaker 1: but it's from the fue Thought Project, and I think
Speaker 1: the Free Thought Project does a lot of great work.
Speaker 1: The uh HIV contamination found in modern A's COVID shots,
Speaker 1: and to me, whether or not the HIV virus is
Speaker 1: doing anything negative in the shot itself, it speaks to
Speaker 1: the level, the sloppy level of control that they have
Speaker 1: exhibited even when creating this thing. It speaks to their
Speaker 1: inability to maintain a secure environment with these shots, so
Speaker 1: at minimum they are contaminated with who knows what else.
Speaker 1: If they are just now finding the HIV contamination in there,
Speaker 1: and it just to prescribe something that is so unknown
Speaker 1: to the general populace has it's truly amazing to me
Speaker 1: that people are not more outraged at this, the number
Speaker 1: of people that will still just run out and get
Speaker 1: another COVID vaccine simply because it makes them feel like
Speaker 1: they're doing something when it is just this conglomeration of
Speaker 1: unknown side effects that we are pumping into people. It
Speaker 1: reminds me of a Gulf War syndrome in some ways.
Speaker 1: And the fact that these you know, this massive all
Speaker 1: these random chemicals were you know, the troops were exposed
Speaker 1: to them, and they presented this massive number of side
Speaker 1: effects that were you know, hard to trace and hard
Speaker 1: to identify and hard to take back to their source.
Speaker 1: And as such, it was very, very hard to get
Speaker 1: a diagnosis of golf war syndrome because it had these numerous,
Speaker 1: litany of side effects that could been caused by other things.
Speaker 1: But here we are. Now we're seeing just chemicals and
Speaker 1: random nonsense being injected to people, and we are seeing
Speaker 1: that again, just this continual cropping up of other extreme
Speaker 1: side effects that are extremely hard to pin down. And
Speaker 1: it is just truly mind boggling that still to this
Speaker 1: day they're discovering new things within the COVID vaccine that
Speaker 1: they didn't know were there.
Speaker 2: Well, you've opened up quite an interesting box. Let me start.
Speaker 2: I always say when I do spaces or educational pieces,
Speaker 2: let's go back to the truth that we know, the
Speaker 2: beginning of the truth we know. So similarly to SARS
Speaker 2: Kobe two, no one has really demonstrated that the human
Speaker 2: the HIV virus right, human immuno compromise virus exists. Now
Speaker 2: watch this, because it's never been demonstrated or isolated. Rather
Speaker 2: in its whole I say round, I don't know, we
Speaker 2: see all these cartoons, so it's never been really demonstrated
Speaker 2: to exist by showing us a whole not a fact
Speaker 2: similar or a sequence or any of this other bs,
Speaker 2: a whole virus from that's been isolated, extracted from an
Speaker 2: ill individual or animal, see all those conditions. Okay, So
Speaker 2: with that said, I feel and a lot of the
Speaker 2: research and work that I've done so far with other
Speaker 2: experts shows us that the same applies to HIV. So
Speaker 2: I'm not saying it doesn't exist. I'm saying we haven't
Speaker 2: seen the evidence yet. But what it did do, Travis,
Speaker 2: is it justified giving people who were diagnosed. However, that
Speaker 2: was done previously and currently now with anti virals boom,
Speaker 2: where are we back to a very expensive, big win
Speaker 2: for pharma on these drugs that are anti virals, are
Speaker 2: very dangerous drugs to give people. I wanted to also say,
Speaker 2: I mean, they make a good point, but what I'm
Speaker 2: concerned about it is and they sound like a great group,
Speaker 2: but I would advise them, hey, don't go down that path,
Speaker 2: assuming that the virus exists, follow more, show me, prove
Speaker 2: to me how are you justifying this diagnosis? And then,
Speaker 2: because we know what your next move is, mister doctor
Speaker 2: or pharma or or HHS, you're going to recommend the
Speaker 2: anti virals for it, same with them. And you brought
Speaker 2: up another really important point that I want to share
Speaker 2: some information with. Indeed, it is true, not just for
Speaker 2: the mRNA COVID shots, by the way, a seasonal flu
Speaker 2: shot full of mRNA. Whether they tell you that or not,
Speaker 2: we have the documentation, We have Albert Bola, the CEO
Speaker 2: of Pfizer, admitting it on camera, boasting about it, very happy,
Speaker 2: bragging about it. And it could be that your COVID
Speaker 2: shot or your seasonal flu. If you say I don't
Speaker 2: want a COVID but I will take seasonal flu, is
Speaker 2: probably a combined. Right now, who knows what's in there?
Speaker 2: And let me tell you why your comment was so
Speaker 2: important on who knows what's in there? Pfizer negotiated for
Speaker 2: itself back in twenty twenty or twenty twenty one with
Speaker 2: the EMA, which is the European Medicines Agency or the
Speaker 2: equivalent of the FDA. They negotiated for themselves of fifty
Speaker 2: percent non disclosure agreement. What does that mean? That means
Speaker 2: that at any time they don't have to disc c
Speaker 2: those half of what's in there, so they can I
Speaker 2: know what they do. I worked. I saw how the
Speaker 2: sausages made in pharma for twenty years. We couldn't do that.
Speaker 2: But that means to me that they can change up
Speaker 2: the formula anytime. They don't have to notify the FDA,
Speaker 2: they don't have to get approval, Travis. This is like
Speaker 2: going to the grocery store and getting a package of
Speaker 2: hot dogs and it says fifty percent meat. The other
Speaker 2: fifty is not disclosed. Would you buy it and eat it?
Speaker 2: Of course not. So why would you have them stick
Speaker 2: something in your arm to do that? So that's the
Speaker 2: danger of it. And this is why it's very challenging
Speaker 2: to help those who've been injured from these shots because
Speaker 2: I'm very careful. I don't want I'm not selling them anything.
Speaker 2: Number one. Number two, they don't know what they got, Nobody,
Speaker 2: nobody except the companies. And there's the scary part. Know
Speaker 2: what anybody got when they got a shot, and they
Speaker 2: don't know what they're getting with an HIV. You know,
Speaker 2: vaccine quote unquote big quotes, and remember everything comes under
Speaker 2: a vaccine gets under the prep back protection. Everybody's protected.
Speaker 2: The injectors, the makers, and the government so very important.
Speaker 2: I just wanted to add that in because people don't
Speaker 2: always connect. Yeah, they all those dots together.
Speaker 1: Yes, thank you very much. And as you said, it
Speaker 1: is there's nothing else like what goes on with the
Speaker 1: vaccine industry where they are protected whole cloth from any
Speaker 1: sort of repercussions, even if you do manage to prove
Speaker 1: that you were injured or damaged by a vaccine. You know,
Speaker 1: in the vaccine court, it is not going to be
Speaker 1: the companies that pay out. That is the government that
Speaker 1: pays out. They have negotiated a ludicrous deal for themselves,
Speaker 1: and you know, you can only imagine that it is
Speaker 1: thanks to a hefty, hefty amount of lobbying, just a
Speaker 1: ludicrous amount of money dispensed to the people in power
Speaker 1: to make sure that no matter what happens, they are
Speaker 1: protected that they never have to pay out under any circumstances.
Speaker 1: And I remember when you know the code vaccines are
Speaker 1: first being shipped out. I forget what South American or
Speaker 1: Central American country it was, but Pfiser is basically saying
Speaker 1: they're going to put a lean on parts of their
Speaker 1: country if they weren't able to pay for the vaccine itself.
Speaker 1: I have never seen a company engage in such strong
Speaker 1: ye such strong arm tactics. I've never seen that in
Speaker 1: my life where they were able to just bully these countries.
Speaker 1: That just the way they did it was incredible.
Speaker 2: And just yeah, that's because it was That's because it
Speaker 2: wasn't the company. Those are do D. Those are yeah,
Speaker 2: those are do D contracts. That's why you have never
Speaker 2: seen any pharmaceutical company do it. Pwiser is basically DODO.
Speaker 2: And that was in social Autopova unveiled a lot of
Speaker 2: those contracts, many redacted but many not. And they showed
Speaker 2: that not only that, but the contracts also listed the
Speaker 2: countries the other the purchasing countries military basis. Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: when we had the suspicion that this was a DoD operation.
Speaker 2: So yeah, yeah, good point, good point to bring up
Speaker 2: on that. You know, I wanted to share. Yeah, I
Speaker 2: wanted to share with you. I don't know if you're
Speaker 2: going to get to it, you can tell me to wait.
Speaker 2: But on the just the approval of Nova.
Speaker 1: Vacs, oh please please absolutely share with what you got.
Speaker 2: Did you were you aware of that? Yeah? You have?
Speaker 1: You used I read the article last night. I saw
Speaker 1: the headline and I was blown away by the fact
Speaker 1: that they're pushing for it and it's going to be
Speaker 1: brought in and it's just again, this is the Trump administration,
Speaker 1: where you know, he brought us warp speed, he brought
Speaker 1: us the vaccines, and he has learned nothing. He had
Speaker 1: to be told by I forget which country Western Arts
Speaker 1: it was, Hey, stop talking about the fact that you're
Speaker 1: the father of vaccine. It doesn't play well with your audience.
Speaker 1: They don't like it. But he hasn't changed who he is.
Speaker 1: He is still going to push more and more shots
Speaker 1: on people.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so here's the deal for for your audience. Yesterday
Speaker 2: or was it two days ago? Two days ago? I
Speaker 2: think by the calendar, the FDA's right in your face.
Speaker 2: They're not even hiding anything. Fully approved. You had to
Speaker 2: understand what fully approved means. And I'm gonna as a
Speaker 2: twenty year pharmaceutical drug development expert, I'm gonna explain that.
Speaker 2: But the FDA fully approved yet another COVID bioweapon shot,
Speaker 2: a dangerous bioweapon shot called nova vax. Now Novavax is
Speaker 2: in the DC area. I believe it's in Maryland. Novavax
Speaker 2: is actually the name of the company. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: if they have a different name for the shot. But
Speaker 2: people have said to me, Oh, that's not an mRNA.
Speaker 2: You shouldn't worry about that, doctor Jane. Well, first of all,
Speaker 2: let's go back to the truth. We know there was
Speaker 2: no pandemic. The COVID thing was probably a synthetic foreign
Speaker 2: protein antigen that was dropped around at different places to
Speaker 2: give you a visual to drive you to take to
Speaker 2: get scared and take the shots. The real bioweapons are
Speaker 2: these shots. This is what's taking people out and contaminating
Speaker 2: our environment. So they approved it. But I want people
Speaker 2: to my big thing, Travis, and people say, oh, you're
Speaker 2: too harsh. Listen, I got to hit you guys over
Speaker 2: the head. You've got to learn to read beyond the
Speaker 2: title of an article. You've got to learn to read
Speaker 2: beyond the title of a publication. Oh I got a study,
Speaker 2: he says this. You know, half the time the title
Speaker 2: doesn't even relate to what's in there. So, Travis, if
Speaker 2: I may let me share it with your audience. If
Speaker 2: you look down at the third paragraph, it says, but
Speaker 2: late Friday, the FDA granted the company full approval for
Speaker 2: its vaccine. Now, before I get into for who it's for,
Speaker 2: let me just say that full approval, Travis means that
Speaker 2: regardless of who it's recommended for, regardless of any black
Speaker 2: box warnings. When it comes down to and I'm talking
Speaker 2: as an experienced prescriber legally allowed to and trained, that
Speaker 2: tells I can prescribe it for anybody at any time,
Speaker 2: under any conditions, even dangerous ones. So it's never illegal
Speaker 2: to prescribe off what's called off label, meaning using it
Speaker 2: for something other than what it was approved for, which
Speaker 2: is how we knew the hydroxychloroquine bands and restrictions were
Speaker 2: not to be prescribed because they were off label. Were
Speaker 2: a lie from the government. We knew it was a
Speaker 2: government operation. But let me go on. It says that
Speaker 2: the approval for its vaccine. But here's a little catch
Speaker 2: that I want to share with people, Travis, but only
Speaker 2: for use in adults sixty five and older, or those
Speaker 2: twelve to sixty four, twelve years old to sixty four
Speaker 2: who have at least one health problem that puts them
Speaker 2: at quote increased risk from COVID nineteen dot dot dot.
Speaker 2: The thing that doesn't exist that's never been proven to
Speaker 2: exist as a flu. So let me get into at risk. Oh,
Speaker 2: it's only for elderly people or those at risk. Well,
Speaker 2: believe me. First of all, they can prescribe it for anybody.
Speaker 2: You watch it. It'll start to get given to children
Speaker 2: without any Oh you better, the doctor will say, you
Speaker 2: don't want them. You know nobovactis. It's safer. It didn't
Speaker 2: get all the bad press like Moderna and Pfizer. Let
Speaker 2: me do. Let me dispel myth number three Travis for
Speaker 2: your audience. People will say, well, it's not the mRNA
Speaker 2: it is, but it gets in in a different way.
Speaker 2: Here's how it does. They took the synthetic protein genetic
Speaker 2: code to tell a body to make it, and they
Speaker 2: inserted it into moth cells, living moth cells, and they
Speaker 2: let the moth cells do the work, and they produced
Speaker 2: billions of these I'm going to call the spike protein
Speaker 2: foreign synthetic foreign proteins, because they are going to aggravate
Speaker 2: your immune system. Your immune system is going to know
Speaker 2: what the hell is that? Okay? So, and then what
Speaker 2: they do is they extracted the billions of those foreign
Speaker 2: proteins slash spike proteins, and they directly inject those into
Speaker 2: the person. Now, Travis, there's no long term study, there's
Speaker 2: no way to know if there is a genetic code
Speaker 2: in there that while it's in your body, it's going
Speaker 2: to deposit that that will go in nano lipid nano
Speaker 2: into your cells and do what Pfizer and Maderna do.
Speaker 2: And in the meantime, those foreign proteins, depending on where
Speaker 2: they land, are going to cause the myocarditis. If they
Speaker 2: land in the cardiac tissue, if they cross the blood
Speaker 2: brain barrier, you may have a stroke. This is your body.
Speaker 2: You can't hear it or feel it until it something happens.
Speaker 2: But this is the body going danger, danger, danger. So
Speaker 2: it's recognizing something that it's never seen before in the
Speaker 2: biological world. But it damn well knows that it's dangerous.
Speaker 2: So when you read that paragraph, you can see three lies. Right. Well,
Speaker 2: they fully approved it. It's only for sixty five year
Speaker 2: olds in child and anybody twelve or older. But Travis,
Speaker 2: the other point I wanted to make was this is exactly
Speaker 2: how they introduced the Pfizer and Moderna. Remember remember it
Speaker 2: was oh, just the elderly and those at risk, not
Speaker 2: not for everybody. And then when everybody got nice and
Speaker 2: normalized and scared, Oh, sure, we'll approve it for the
Speaker 2: rest of you. Yeah, this is a slippery slope.
Speaker 1: It always it starts on the margins and works its
Speaker 1: way in with everything they do, and it's like, oh,
Speaker 1: it's only for extreme cases, it's only for this, it's
Speaker 1: only for that. And the next thing you know, you know,
Speaker 1: everyone in the grocery store is wearing a mask and
Speaker 1: has the little you know, injection mark on their arm,
Speaker 1: and it truly has spiraled out from there, and.
Speaker 2: Before you know what, the pediatrician is saying, Look, I
Speaker 2: know it was initially approved for, you know, just elderly,
Speaker 2: but you really should get Johnny. He's fifteen years old
Speaker 2: and he's going to be traveling. You really should give
Speaker 2: him this shot. And I want to remind people of
Speaker 2: another thing, Travis. I know you'll appreciate this.
Speaker 3: This is all happening. I don't care what Biden did.
Speaker 3: This is happening under Trump exactly. This is happening under Kennedy.
Speaker 3: There's no more excuses.
Speaker 2: Since Trump was inaugurated, over two and a half million
Speaker 2: babies and children have been stuck with this poison that
Speaker 2: was never ready for human beings. Yes, and I'm angry
Speaker 2: about it. Travis, I'm angry. I'm entitled. You should all
Speaker 2: be every one of you out there should be angry,
Speaker 2: because it's not until you get angry that this stops.
Speaker 2: They're not going to stop it. Congress exempted themselves. You
Speaker 2: want to go to Congress for justice, please, they exempted themselves.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the way it always goes. Anytime Congress gets
Speaker 1: caught doing something, it's like, oh, they make a show
Speaker 1: of it, as we've said, and it goes right back
Speaker 1: to business as usual. And I think it's even more
Speaker 1: heinous under Donald Trump, simply because he was supposed to
Speaker 1: be He marketed himself as the answer to this, as, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm going to put a stop to it. We all
Speaker 1: knew what Joe Biden was, that he was part of
Speaker 1: the power structure, that he was the exact problem that
Speaker 1: we've had for years, and personally, I think I think
Speaker 1: most of us knew that Donald Trump was the exact
Speaker 1: same thing. But to me, it's more heinous when someone
Speaker 1: tells you that they're going to fix the problem, when
Speaker 1: they promise resolution and they don't deliver it to these
Speaker 1: people that are caught up in the madness of it.
Speaker 1: They see they just believe what they're told. They are
Speaker 1: intrinsically trusting of the power structure. They look at it
Speaker 1: and go, Okay, we know there's a problem, and he
Speaker 1: says he's going to fix it. So that's great, And that,
Speaker 1: to me is more wicked and worse than Joe Biden
Speaker 1: just bumbling around and going with the flow, because we
Speaker 1: all knew that was going to happen, there was no
Speaker 1: illusions of it.
Speaker 2: And then and then Trump comes in three days after
Speaker 2: inauguration and says boldly, not only am I not going
Speaker 2: to remove it, I'm going to give you a souped
Speaker 2: up version. AI is going to create your own customized
Speaker 2: one for this one that I'm never going to acknowledge.
Speaker 2: You know, murdered millions and millions of people. And the
Speaker 2: other thing that's happened under Trump and under Kennedy is
Speaker 2: fast and Marty makery. This puppet FDA director is is
Speaker 2: the they fast tracked an mRNA shot for bird flu
Speaker 2: for animals. Where do you think that's going. It's it's
Speaker 2: really dangerous, Travis, It's so dangerous.
Speaker 1: The bird flu is one of the things that is
Speaker 1: the most absurd to me because they continually talk about
Speaker 1: how dangerous it was, but they're the ones that killed
Speaker 1: the millions upon millions of chickens. That we weren't seeing
Speaker 1: birds dropping dead, we weren't seeing cows dropping dead, we
Speaker 1: weren't seeing people dropping dead. But they came in and
Speaker 1: they they killed millions of chickens and drove egg prices
Speaker 1: through the roof because of it. And it is simply
Speaker 1: another one of those things where they can say, you know, headline,
Speaker 1: you know CDC had to euthanize millions of chickens, Well,
Speaker 1: why they weren't dying. They weren't. They weren't going to
Speaker 1: impact anything. It just gives them the terrifying headline that
Speaker 1: they that the people can point to and go see,
Speaker 1: see they had to kill They had to kill millions
Speaker 1: upon millions of chickens to save us from this. It's like,
Speaker 1: did they did?
Speaker 2: They really good point? And isn't it interesting? I live
Speaker 2: off of a preserve and I don't see any sick
Speaker 2: wild birds, so how did it jump? And the other
Speaker 2: thing is it's I think, Travis, I'm very doubtful. I
Speaker 2: think that they used it as a beta kind of
Speaker 2: a beta testing situation where they saw they could draw.
Speaker 2: You know, they're not geniuses in the economy, so they
Speaker 2: tested it out. They got those egg price. Oh we
Speaker 2: could do that with fear. Let's see how high we
Speaker 2: can get it to go. Now they're coming back down again,
Speaker 2: But who knows if they didn't when they culled all
Speaker 2: those livestock. If they didn't then tell those farmers, hey,
Speaker 2: you want to restart up again, you got to use
Speaker 2: these chicks and this chemical and this material, because they
Speaker 2: reset them with what they wanted to install. So I'm
Speaker 2: always very suspicious of that. But like all the rest
Speaker 2: of you should be doing. I work with local co
Speaker 2: ops here and local ranchers, and they're more than happy
Speaker 2: to tell you what's happening, the harassment they're taking from
Speaker 2: Department of Agriculture, and how they protect their cattle or
Speaker 2: their livestock whatever it is, from these materials. And then
Speaker 2: in along with supporting them and buying their their products,
Speaker 2: their animal products and you know, dairy and all that,
Speaker 2: we actually are close to the source, so we know
Speaker 2: we're gonna see if something's different. And these people are
Speaker 2: just as dedicated and they understand the truth like we do.
Speaker 2: So yeah, get out of the big box, you know.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry Costco, I'm sorry Walmart, I'm sorry Big Box.
Speaker 2: Those meats, I wouldn't trust them anywhere, if they're even
Speaker 2: real at all anymore.
Speaker 1: We've started keeping our own chickens here over the last
Speaker 1: about year year and a half now, and the eggs
Speaker 1: are just so much better quality than you will ever
Speaker 1: get from the store. If you buy them from a
Speaker 1: local co op, from someone who raises their own chickens,
Speaker 1: that's great. If you're able to raise your own chickens,
Speaker 1: that's great too. It is work, you've got to, you know,
Speaker 1: clean up after the chickens, but the eggs you get
Speaker 1: are so much better, and you know what goes into them.
Speaker 1: You're not worrying that the farmer has been feeding them
Speaker 1: some kind of weird chemical concoction, or that the chicken
Speaker 1: was in with some weird vaccine for something that doesn't exist. So,
Speaker 1: if you're able to raise your own chickens, or like
Speaker 1: you said, get involved with your local co op and
Speaker 1: buy them locally, do that. It is one of the
Speaker 1: easiest ways to start taking back control of your own
Speaker 1: health is make sure you know what goes into your body.
Speaker 1: Make sure you know what goes into what goes into
Speaker 1: your body.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you reminded me of something else I was in,
Speaker 2: you know, I was in the tractor supply store. It's
Speaker 2: a public store, and I was looking at the baby
Speaker 2: chicks and I was kind of thinking about it. I'm
Speaker 2: in more of a residential area, but I thought, well,
Speaker 2: I'll just get a couple of chickens and they'll be
Speaker 2: my I'll just register them as my emotional supports. They
Speaker 2: can't tell me what kind of animal they have. But
Speaker 2: what I noticed, Travis, and I think your dad mentioned
Speaker 2: it once on the show that he had seen me
Speaker 2: mention it was there was a sign on the cages
Speaker 2: that said that we have chicks that are have been cleared.
Speaker 2: They're free of you know, which is code for vaccinated.
Speaker 2: They're free of AV and blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 2: Oh no, so these are mRNA injected. I'm not sure, Travis,
Speaker 2: but I think it speaks to like you said, almost
Speaker 2: you made me think of something. Maybe if you have
Speaker 2: a local chicken farmer, you pay them for chicks, and
Speaker 2: you know that again they came from his or her firm,
Speaker 2: not necessarily Big Egg because a chain store is going
Speaker 2: to be big egg, right, we might not, but good
Speaker 2: point all around. The better the closer you can get
Speaker 2: to the beginning, you know, the chain of food, the better.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you've got to establis. Like in the cop shows,
Speaker 1: establish a chain of custody, and if that chain of
Speaker 1: custody is broken, you don't know what happened to it.
Speaker 1: It's not admissible. You can't admit it as evidence. I also,
Speaker 1: I saw this headline and I read I read the
Speaker 1: article last night, but it says, you know, the FDA
Speaker 1: agrees to take down I've remixed and posts in legal
Speaker 1: settlement with doctors. So I found that to be at
Speaker 1: least a hopeful sign at least that there is some
Speaker 1: recompense being paid to these doctors that were trying to
Speaker 1: use ivermectin to help people, because it did seem with
Speaker 1: whatever was going on, ivermectin did seem to help. We
Speaker 1: had some friends that got sick and they took ivermectin
Speaker 1: and it basically helps them instantaneously. So I find that
Speaker 1: to be at least a hopeful sign that's somewhere some
Speaker 1: of these doctors are getting justice for the fact that
Speaker 1: the government just came down on them with a hammer
Speaker 1: and basically, in my opinion, forced them to violate their
Speaker 1: hipocratic oath to some extent and said, you cannot provide treatment,
Speaker 1: You cannot provide something that will help people. You were
Speaker 1: going to push what we have allotted to you. So
Speaker 1: I am happy to see that. What's your opinion on that?
Speaker 1: Do you think that speaks to a sea change or
Speaker 1: a shift in things?
Speaker 2: Yes? First of all, when the government precludes or prohibits
Speaker 2: trained experts and professionals from doing something, especially under public health,
Speaker 2: which has actually been hijacked by the military. There was
Speaker 2: no such thing as public health. But when the government
Speaker 2: that was the moment that any sign of that, like
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty or beyond, is very frightening to me.
Speaker 2: That is the epitome of tyranny. But let me speak
Speaker 2: to this cybermectin issue. I want to speak to it
Speaker 2: sort of in a balanced way. As you indicated, you
Speaker 2: hinted at or mentioned, I too saw ivermectin that work
Speaker 2: almost instantaneously. The paste was snuck into hospitals for friends,
Speaker 2: for people that came to me in my show and
Speaker 2: told me later, people that got the medication itself snuck
Speaker 2: in or brought to their home and the almost immediate reversal.
Speaker 2: This bode for the suggestion although drugs can have different
Speaker 2: mechanisms of action. This bode for the suggestion that this
Speaker 2: was really that the whole COVID thing was parasite eggs
Speaker 2: and parasites. Well, that at least that's part of it,
Speaker 2: since we don't know entirely what's in these shots. But
Speaker 2: because I witnessed the rapid reversal of these FLUC symptoms,
Speaker 2: which I think is really a lot of poisoning from
Speaker 2: a lot of different sources. Another talk for another day.
Speaker 2: I was very surprised to see recently another chorus come out.
Speaker 2: Some people in the chorus were people that I respected,
Speaker 2: not going to name names, respected, worked with, had good
Speaker 2: understandings with, we shared medical understanding, and yet they are
Speaker 2: out there warning and listen. I'm open. I'm open to
Speaker 2: the warnings because it's an it's a pharmaceutical drug and
Speaker 2: anybody can make it now, right, it's generic. Anybody can
Speaker 2: make it. So it is suspicious. Are they changing the
Speaker 2: formulation and these other people in the chorus have gotten
Speaker 2: information that they it's dangerous. Okay, I'm open to all
Speaker 2: of that, but I also am open and concerned always.
Speaker 2: Anybody Travis, at any time, by the grace of God,
Speaker 2: can be flipped, can be threatened with the carrot or
Speaker 2: the stick. And so these people that did good before
Speaker 2: might have might might not be doing good now. So
Speaker 2: I don't know, but I'll tell you one thing is
Speaker 2: if I got a severe flu symptom syndrome, I would
Speaker 2: jump on the ivermectin as well as some other things.
Speaker 2: But that's I'm giving myself that advice. Yeah, so I
Speaker 2: would say to everybody else, stay open, keep listening to
Speaker 2: these people. Always use show me, show me, prove.
Speaker 1: It exactly, show me. Right, as you said, ivermectin is
Speaker 1: still a drug. It's not something to just be taken
Speaker 1: blindly without any sort of idea that there may be
Speaker 1: side effects or consequences for it. It is still produced
Speaker 1: by the pharmaceutical industry. It may have less severe side
Speaker 1: effects or you know, side effects that are worth dealing
Speaker 1: with to get rid of whatever you have, but it
Speaker 1: is still a created concoction from the pharmaceutical industry.
Speaker 2: And on that same note, I wanted to say, I'm
Speaker 2: sorry me to cut you off there made a little
Speaker 2: delay The same thing goes for the nicotine issue. I've
Speaker 2: been you know, chastises a little bit. Oh you know,
Speaker 2: these other doctors came out. Listen what they're talking about.
Speaker 2: In terms of gum patches or pills. Those are full
Speaker 2: on pharmaceuticals number one. Number two. If you've never smoked
Speaker 2: or chewed tobacco in your life, you are what we
Speaker 2: call in the medical community nicotine naive. Number two, so
Speaker 2: you could have severe side effects, profound vomiting. It's a
Speaker 2: very powerful drug. Three. I do not agree. I will
Speaker 2: say this publicly, Travis. I've said it before. I do
Speaker 2: not condone or agree with other doctors or healthcare experts
Speaker 2: prescribing for the general population. Oh just try nicotine, It'll
Speaker 2: do that, It'll make this go away. I'm like, unless
Speaker 2: you have a direct patient provider relationship, why do I
Speaker 2: say that? Because if I say to you in a
Speaker 2: public you know, hey, yeah, Travis, take that nicotine the
Speaker 2: next time your you know, your flu symptoms will go
Speaker 2: away or whatever it is. You don't have a conduit
Speaker 2: to me. If you get a simple you need to
Speaker 2: determine with an expert is that symptom attributable to the nicotine?
Speaker 2: Or is it something else. In all fairness, if it
Speaker 2: is attributable to the nicotine, you need a dose adjustment.
Speaker 2: How do you know what to do? Is the person
Speaker 2: taking it? You don't know if you don't have that relationship.
Speaker 2: So I do not agree with this mass population public prescribing.
Speaker 2: I believe you can drive people to a trusted healthcare
Speaker 2: provider and talk to your doctor. I know it's a pharmaceutical,
Speaker 2: but these doctors have shown you some great results. Go
Speaker 2: talk to your natural path and all that, and you
Speaker 2: know they'll get And by the way, there's no equivalent.
Speaker 2: I'm going to tell you between vegetables that have those
Speaker 2: that nicotine and the pharmaceutical version. How do I know
Speaker 2: that it has to be because if it was the
Speaker 2: same thing that occurs in nature, they couldn't patent it,
Speaker 2: they couldn't sell it. So they've bastardized it in some way. Technically,
Speaker 2: they've added something to it. And of course, if you
Speaker 2: look at these products like the gum and the patches,
Speaker 2: they have the additives, they have dangerous additives to them,
Speaker 2: and color dies and things that have not been banned yet.
Speaker 2: So you gotta everybody's going to slow down a little bit,
Speaker 2: that's my message.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's always important to do your own research and
Speaker 1: never just rush into things blindly, especially when things are new.
Speaker 1: This is a little bit of a silly comparison, but
Speaker 1: I remember when the Xbox three sixty came out, the
Speaker 1: first generation of it, almost a gigantic portion of them
Speaker 1: fried themselves. Technology is an especially visible area where jumping
Speaker 1: in on the first wave of things can lead you
Speaker 1: to getting suckered. Where it breaks itself, it fries it,
Speaker 1: it has some very very bad issues that they resolve
Speaker 1: in future iterations. But it's a lot harder to tell
Speaker 1: that when the pharmaceutical industry, where the first iteration of
Speaker 1: something may be very very harmful. But again, it can
Speaker 1: be very difficult to track these symptoms and side effects
Speaker 1: back to the origin source. It can be very difficult
Speaker 1: to say, oh, yeah, it's definitely attributable to whether it's
Speaker 1: nicotine or the COVID vaccine or any other innumerable the
Speaker 1: n innumerable list of drugs that they push on people.
Speaker 1: So anytime you're looking at something, be especially wary when
Speaker 1: it's new, when it's on the cutting edge and the
Speaker 1: bleeding edge, whether it's technology or the pharmaceutical industry. It's very,
Speaker 1: very dangerous, especially at that time period.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's funny you bring up the Xbox because I
Speaker 2: remember similarly around another technology years ago, someone who is
Speaker 2: like an IT expert said to me, oh, you don't
Speaker 2: want to be the beta testing around Jane, And I thought, oh, right,
Speaker 2: you know, you don't want to be first one out
Speaker 2: unless they're giving it to you for free to test it.
Speaker 2: But other than that, you don't want to buy the
Speaker 2: first run of anything. And a lot of people charged
Speaker 2: in with the COVID shots, as you well know, and
Speaker 2: they paid a heavy price for it. Yeah, they paid
Speaker 2: a heavy price, so we need them back.
Speaker 1: It's a it's been truly horrifying to see just the
Speaker 1: uptick in especially young people just keeling over from heart attacks.
Speaker 1: And it's just the thing that always gets me is
Speaker 1: people like, oh, well, this was always happening, but it
Speaker 1: wasn't reported on. It's like, I just flat out don't
Speaker 1: believe that this was not happening. We weren't seeing soccer
Speaker 1: players or basketball players or football players just keeling over
Speaker 1: from heart attacks in their teenage years. If a child
Speaker 1: did have a heart attack, it was such an aberration
Speaker 1: that it would have been reported on, but now it
Speaker 1: has become quite commonplace. We see it, you know, very
Speaker 1: very frequently. And my personal pet theory is we've seen
Speaker 1: drowning deaths go up, and I believe that the COVID
Speaker 1: vaccine tends to, you know, put extra stress on the
Speaker 1: heart and other areas. So when you're putting extra extra
Speaker 1: stress on it in terms of physical exercise, it can
Speaker 1: lead to these adverse reactions happening very quickly. So I
Speaker 1: attribute the rise in drowning deaths to people, you know,
Speaker 1: finding out that they got a bad batch of the
Speaker 1: COVID vaccine and you know, having an issue while they're
Speaker 1: in the water. But that's just my own personal conspiracy
Speaker 1: theory right there.
Speaker 2: But now we don't even know the stent. You made
Speaker 2: a really good point. When you're on the highway, you
Speaker 2: have no idea. People say, I'm worried about I personally
Speaker 2: am worried about pilots. I went through that whole thing
Speaker 2: in twenty one and twenty two, exposing all the CEOs
Speaker 2: of these airlines that took billions of dollars from the
Speaker 2: government to push their pilots to take it. I said,
Speaker 2: you're going to put them in the air. What if
Speaker 2: they have a heart attack and then the other pilot
Speaker 2: doesn't know, you know, anyway, but that is the danger
Speaker 2: of it. But the worst at least it's up there
Speaker 2: and you've got other pilots and whatever. Not that I'm
Speaker 2: saying it's safe. But on the road, you don't knows
Speaker 2: on the road who may have a sudden heart attack.
Speaker 2: Maybe they have a mental status change and they hallucinate.
Speaker 2: I mean, all kinds of issues have come out of
Speaker 2: people that have been jabbed. You're surrounded by people that
Speaker 2: have been jabbed, you know, not to mention the future
Speaker 2: damage to the damage to the human genome, and how
Speaker 2: your children and grandchildren will not likely know their mate mates.
Speaker 2: Legis family legacy in terms of who took the shot. Eventually,
Speaker 2: it's going to get saturated and it makes me sick
Speaker 2: to my stomach. Yeah, but I pray for a miracle
Speaker 2: from God that he somehow I don't know, Noah's ark
Speaker 2: cleanses is it, I don't know. Yeah, they didn't do anything.
Speaker 1: That is something that I've been concerned about. My wife
Speaker 1: and I had our first child last year and he's
Speaker 1: he's wonderful, But that is something that I just grow
Speaker 1: concerned about just what does the future hold for him?
Speaker 1: You know, how is he going There's no real way
Speaker 1: to tell, because you know, maybe the woman that he's
Speaker 1: going to fall in love with or get married to
Speaker 1: didn't get the vaccine, but what if her dad did,
Speaker 1: or her mom did, or they both did, and what
Speaker 1: has that done on a genetic level. It's very very
Speaker 1: scary times we live in because there's real there's no
Speaker 1: real way to tell. We actually have a question from
Speaker 1: Angry Tiger.
Speaker 2: On Kick I Love Questions.
Speaker 1: He says, a question for the doc does she think
Speaker 1: that people who are vaccinated are shedding on us? And
Speaker 1: how can we protect ourselves if they are?
Speaker 2: You know, in the beginning when they started pushing the shots,
Speaker 2: that's a great question. Thank you for bringing that up.
Speaker 2: And I know people are still concerned about it. When
Speaker 2: they first started to push these shots out, remember there
Speaker 2: was like a collection of people all over the world,
Speaker 2: and you know, when you're doing the show, like you
Speaker 2: guys do and like I do, you tend to get
Speaker 2: more information from the general public. So they start to
Speaker 2: see patterns and a lot of people were expressing that
Speaker 2: they were having they were not jabbed, and that they
Speaker 2: were in a room where their family was or whatever
Speaker 2: the group was, and they were experiencing symptoms that were
Speaker 2: unpleasant and that took like a day or two to
Speaker 2: get rid of. Or maybe they took hydroxychloroquin or ivermectin
Speaker 2: and they went away faster. And at first I was skeptical,
Speaker 2: Travis and I started, I started to get into groups.
Speaker 2: They had these club forty fives down here at these
Speaker 2: you know, Trump sycophants. But at the time we would
Speaker 2: go for like general you know, presentations and guest speakers
Speaker 2: and all that. I knew that a lot of those
Speaker 2: people elderly in that room, and they were smaller, they
Speaker 2: were closed off, you know, Florida with the air conditioning,
Speaker 2: and I started to get those symptoms. And we can
Speaker 2: talk about the details another time. I'm happy to answer it.
Speaker 2: But then I started to believe something's being transferred. When
Speaker 2: you look into the Peiser documents, Pfiser itself, Travis has
Speaker 2: a document in their Investigators brochure that's for when you're
Speaker 2: about to start a trial. You have multi center sites
Speaker 2: across the country, and those the leaders of those sites
Speaker 2: are called investigators. You put together as a pharmaceutical company,
Speaker 2: something called the investigators Brochure, and in that brochure it
Speaker 2: supposedly tells you as much as they can about the
Speaker 2: drug ahead of time that you're going to start in
Speaker 2: your clinic, you know, running your trial. There's a page
Speaker 2: or two in there. It specifically says for the peiser
Speaker 2: covid injection, it says, if you have they give an
Speaker 2: example of a male who is treated right getting the
Speaker 2: injection and is if he has a wife It says
Speaker 2: spouse or partner, female of child bearing age then and
Speaker 2: if she is exposed to him. It didn't say a timeframe.
Speaker 2: It was what caught my eye, Travis, was it was
Speaker 2: to become a reportable SAE. What does that mean? We
Speaker 2: have adverse events and we have serious adverse events. These
Speaker 2: are two very distinct categories in drug development pharma. Aes
Speaker 2: are basically anything I had a back ache, I threw up,
Speaker 2: whatever it is, I got a rash. Serious aes are
Speaker 2: only about five things. Death, anaphylaxis, which is life threatening,
Speaker 2: allergy where your throat everything blows up, visit to the hospital.
Speaker 2: There were a couple of as I can't remember off
Speaker 2: the top of my but you get the idea, and
Speaker 2: I thought to myself, Oh serious, Ae, she was just
Speaker 2: in the same room and he got his vaccine. Why
Speaker 2: would that be a And it goes on to say,
Speaker 2: because there is transference, and it happened in two pathways,
Speaker 2: inhalation and skin the skin contact. And I said, Jesus,
Speaker 2: take the wheel. Are you kidding me? So here now,
Speaker 2: with all that said, let me wrap it up with
Speaker 2: this ball. We don't know what you've got. Some of
Speaker 2: you got something that may exude and make others sick
Speaker 2: if they're so vulnerable. Some of you didn't get that,
Speaker 2: you got something else, and you got other additives. This
Speaker 2: is the evil and the diabolical nature of what has
Speaker 2: been done to us. So I personally would never date
Speaker 2: somebody I knew who had the shots because I don't
Speaker 2: want to be exposed intimately to whatever they got. I
Speaker 2: don't know what they got. They don't even know what
Speaker 2: they got. So this is where it just it's going
Speaker 2: to all fold in together in the next generation or two,
Speaker 2: and I think the evil is going to exponentially expand unform.
Speaker 2: I know that's not a happy answer. I apologize, but
Speaker 2: I do believe that if I tell you the truth
Speaker 2: out there, you will definitely be looking in the right
Speaker 2: places for better solutions.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's important. It's a you can't sugarcoat things. You
Speaker 1: can't give people this sort of just happy, well, you know,
Speaker 1: oh uh, things are all going to work out. It's
Speaker 1: like we know, because we're Christians. In the end, things
Speaker 1: do work out in the next life. But that's not
Speaker 1: an excuse to put your head in the sand and
Speaker 1: ignore what's going on here on earth. So you have
Speaker 1: to give people the unvarnished truth. And of course everyone
Speaker 1: has their own bias, so we always encourage everyone to
Speaker 1: go do your own research and form yourself on these
Speaker 1: things as well. But doctor Jane, I want to thank
Speaker 1: you for coming on with us, and we only have
Speaker 1: a few minutes left. I want to ask you if
Speaker 1: there's anything in particular you'd like to cover here in
Speaker 1: these last few minutes before you know the show ends.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you. It's really been an honor, Travis. I
Speaker 2: really appreciate you having the confidence and having me on,
Speaker 2: you know, while you're filling in for your day. I
Speaker 2: think you should do your own I heard you before
Speaker 2: the show talk about your idea. Maybe for people who
Speaker 2: are interested in those other topics and younger people and
Speaker 2: stuff like that. So you have a great role model.
Speaker 2: But I thank you for that. And I think the
Speaker 2: last few minutes of a message I would want to
Speaker 2: give all of you is go slowly. You are in
Speaker 2: an information war. They're not going to shoot a cannon
Speaker 2: for your front door. They're going to lie to you.
Speaker 2: They're going to show you things with artificial intelligence that
Speaker 2: they can use to manipulate you. And I want to
Speaker 2: just add in terms of this is my personal opinion
Speaker 2: on the artificial intelligence platforms. I don't have to name them,
Speaker 2: but people will say, well, so and so the platform
Speaker 2: said this. I looked it up here. This is not
Speaker 2: an unbiased encyclopedia digital encyclopedia. These AI platforms have are propaganda.
Speaker 2: They have been programmed by people that want you to
Speaker 2: think a certain way. They're dangerous mentally that way. Yes,
Speaker 2: you will be sacrificing your God given mentality, your discernment,
Speaker 2: your you know, God created a section of the brain
Speaker 2: that animals don't have, called executive function, and it's in
Speaker 2: the frontal cortex. Don't throw it away. Still, vet still
Speaker 2: look things up. So I wanted to warn people about that.
Speaker 2: And the bottom line for me is. I jumped in
Speaker 2: in March of twenty twenty, Travis for two reasons babies
Speaker 2: and children and our military. And I've worked on tros
Speaker 2: with attorneys in two major military cases against the mandates
Speaker 2: for the military. And my primary concern is, please don't
Speaker 2: give this ways into your babies or your children, and
Speaker 2: let's stop it as much as we can. So thanks
Speaker 2: again for having me again, my prayers and love to
Speaker 2: your dad.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 2: You know miraculous recovery every day. He deserves it and
Speaker 2: we need him.
Speaker 1: Yes, I agree, Thank you so much, doctor Ruby. And again,
Speaker 1: her website is Doctorjaneeruby dot com. Look for her stuff there,
Speaker 1: go Fallow or her wherever she is listening to her podcast.
Speaker 1: We will be right back and I will answer your comments.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, doctor Ruby.
Speaker 4: Julie listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Well, welcome back, folks, and got an issue with the
Speaker 1: screen right now, but welcome back. Thank you for staying
Speaker 1: with us. That was, in my opinion, a fantastic interview.
Speaker 1: Doctor Jane Ruby has a lot of great information and
Speaker 1: I'm just going to read through the comments that we
Speaker 1: have here from Chambers Nancy. Everybody's protected except the victims.
Speaker 1: That was in regards to the vaccine industry. That is correct.
Speaker 1: The victims are the ones that get no justice. Then
Speaker 1: on kick, Camille Grancowick's get the a sub on kick.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, Camille. I'm sorry I didn't get
Speaker 1: to it sooner. I hope you're still there. We really
Speaker 1: appreciate the support. It is wonderful to see the generosity
Speaker 1: from everyone. John bez Alone, a thirty year old airline pilot,
Speaker 1: just passed out in the cockpit. The other pilot was
Speaker 1: to use the restroom and was locked out. Pilot was
Speaker 1: passed out for ten minutes. The other pilot was locked out.
Speaker 1: I imagine I haven't seen that headline, but I imagine
Speaker 1: that was an absolutely horrifying experience for everyone on the plane.
Speaker 1: I can't even imagine the level of terror that would produce.
Speaker 1: But yeah, these are these sorts of things we're seeing now,
Speaker 1: people just passing out or having heart attacks. Ron Helton
Speaker 1: one Travis, I had the same exact symptoms as those
Speaker 1: soldiers who had Golf War syndrome. I'm friendly convinced that
Speaker 1: it was from the jabs that they gave us when
Speaker 1: they activated our units. Yeah, I mean, even just the
Speaker 1: sheer number of random chemicals and garbage that is in
Speaker 1: our environment now, in my opinion, is probably somewhat mimicking
Speaker 1: the effects of Golf War syndrome in the fact that
Speaker 1: you're just being exposed to a plethora of toxic chemicals
Speaker 1: at all times. Probably not in the concentration or the
Speaker 1: level of toxicity that the soldiers in the Gulf War
Speaker 1: were exposed to, but just in the fact that it
Speaker 1: is a numerous different, extreme variation of toxic chemicals, whether
Speaker 1: it's the plastics were always constantly ingesting or others. MAV
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. They have new vaccines coming out that
Speaker 1: were engineered with insects. What could go wrong? Yes, I
Speaker 1: for one can't wait for these scorpion do crawl up
Speaker 1: my arm and inject me with its own bio vaccine.
Speaker 1: Be a fun time. Indeed, Acca and pelists should love
Speaker 1: their insects, eating them, injecting you with them, everything they
Speaker 1: can do, and they treat us like insects, so exactly,
Speaker 1: we're their own little terrarium to play with. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Mav nmex safe and effective, Yeah, but it wasn't tested
Speaker 1: and no ingredient list right, But where the experts trust
Speaker 1: us it's safe and effective. That's right. You ask no
Speaker 1: questions because they're the experts. You just do what you told.
Speaker 1: Jerry Alatalo from Desvier is removed from Ebola treatment trials
Speaker 1: because it killed repeat killed fifty six percent of those
Speaker 1: who received the REMD severe during initial trials. That's right.
Speaker 1: It was renamed run death is near because they knew
Speaker 1: when they gave the patient to remed severe they would
Speaker 1: pass away soon. Johnny gospel Seed. They still have children
Speaker 1: getting their first COVID shot at six months, and then
Speaker 1: a backup booster within a year, and then a booster
Speaker 1: every year thereafter.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 1: This isn't going away. A Syrian girl, I think they
Speaker 1: will be trying to hide mRNA in everything. After all,
Speaker 1: they want to kill as many of us as possible,
Speaker 1: as fast as they can. That's right. It's going to
Speaker 1: end up in all of in anything they get it into.
Speaker 1: Ron Helton won They made it illegal here to have chickens.
Speaker 1: I think they are the pocket of local grocery store,
Speaker 1: just saying that's right. Big Chicken doesn't want you to know,
Speaker 1: but you can keep chickens in your backyard. Well, some
Speaker 1: places you can out e MRR. Government deception is very
Speaker 1: easy to detect by one simple ask, asking logical questions.
Speaker 1: That's right, you just have to ask logical questions, use
Speaker 1: your brain. And if you just simply abide by the
Speaker 1: axiom government does not want what's good for you. They
Speaker 1: simply want to control you. You don't have to worry
Speaker 1: too much. You will get it right ninety percent of
Speaker 1: the time. The government is not your friend, folks. All right, Well,
Speaker 1: that's all the comments that I have time for. We've
Speaker 1: got plenty of information about statins that I'll pass along.
Speaker 1: I thank you all for all of that. Guard Chavkin,
Speaker 1: Ron Helton, Map twenty twenty two, dougda Real, Octo, Spook, Solocat,
Speaker 1: and Angry Tiger. I thank you all for those comments.
Speaker 1: And remember, if you want to support US hospital bills
Speaker 1: are expensive, you can tip on kicks, Pbscribestar dot Com, Ords, Lasty,
Speaker 1: David Night Show, Zell David Night Show, proton Maail dot Com,
Speaker 1: David Night dot Gold, and Transjournal from a Code Night.
Speaker 1: Thanks for joining us. Have a great rest of your day.
Speaker 4: The common Man they created common Core, dumb down our children,
Speaker 4: they created common past, track and control us They're Commons
Speaker 4: project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the
Speaker 4: communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary.
Speaker 4: But each of us has worth and dignity created in
Speaker 4: the image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 4: That is what they want to take away. The most
Speaker 4: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, and inidation. They desire to
Speaker 4: know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 4: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 4: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 4: find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 4: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 4: please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com