Speaker 1: Welcome to the three Stories version of the Todd Herman Shows.
Speaker 1: Story number one, what was Stephen Colbert's actual job? I
Speaker 1: guess still is that he's not officially fired yet. Story
Speaker 1: number two, Juries without Souls, It's closer than you think.
Speaker 1: And story number three, When nothing is forbidden, everything is allowed.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about this with the help of Know Your
Speaker 1: Risk podcast dot com and of course God Almighty.
Speaker 2: But Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved by
Speaker 2: big pharma technocrats and Tyrant's everywhere from the high mountains
Speaker 2: of Free America. Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made, and these
Speaker 1: are the times to which God has decided we shall live.
Speaker 3: Now the Todd Herman Show.
Speaker 4: We need to ask a question, but.
Speaker 1: It's one been asking for well about eight or nine years.
Speaker 1: As we've been looking at the business model of the
Speaker 1: Mockingbird Media. We've seen the decline in viewership. We've seen
Speaker 1: the sinking ratings of MSNBC and many of the so
Speaker 1: called comedy shows. This isn't the first time we've asked
Speaker 1: this question. We've asked it continually. How are they getting
Speaker 1: propped up? How are they continuing to operate. Stephen Colbert's
Speaker 1: program was apparently losing forty million dollars a year, and
Speaker 1: it was one hundred million per year to produce the show,
Speaker 1: which is effectively a dude sitting at a desk talking.
Speaker 4: To people after he tells jokes one.
Speaker 1: Hundred million a year. And when this cancelation came about
Speaker 1: and it's been announced that this is the last season
Speaker 1: of Colbert's program, then of course came what we have
Speaker 1: been told or conspiracy theories because you don't have proof.
Speaker 3: This is a true, true, do nothing.
Speaker 1: Senator who has a whole theory about this, and he
Speaker 1: posted this proudly on Twitter, which is a of course,
Speaker 1: white supremacist outfit, Senator Chris Murphy.
Speaker 5: So I want to tell you why the cancelation of
Speaker 5: Stephen Colbert's show matters so much. We are on the
Speaker 5: precipice of entering a censorship state in which Donald Trump
Speaker 5: is using the powers of the federal government in order
Speaker 5: to erase criticism from the airwaves. This is a really,
Speaker 5: really dangerous moment. Stephen Colbert didn't get thrown off the
Speaker 5: air because he wasn't doing well. He was the highest
Speaker 5: rated show on TV. In late night. He was canceled
Speaker 5: very likely because Paramount and its owners are trying to
Speaker 5: get rich off of this merger, and Donald Trump has
Speaker 5: made it clear to them and everybody else in the
Speaker 5: media space that if you want any favors from me,
Speaker 5: then you have to silence my critics on your platforms.
Speaker 1: You are on x A platform saying that you can
Speaker 1: go get on any platform to say that because you
Speaker 1: get to call yourself the United States senator, although you
Speaker 1: don't do much senatoring. There have been countless calls for
Speaker 1: President Trump to be unalived by Hollywood actors on platforms.
Speaker 1: Politicians have called.
Speaker 3: For him to be unlived on platforms.
Speaker 1: Karen Bass, the leaguereds and corrupt mayor of Los Angeles,
Speaker 1: has called for him to be taken out on platforms.
Speaker 1: There is no indication that this has anything to do
Speaker 1: with other than the fact that Colbert is losing forty
Speaker 1: million per year. Brian Stelter has a platform where he
Speaker 1: gets to speak his view of this. Is he being silenced?
Speaker 1: Is he being taken off the screens? Or is Brian
Speaker 1: Stelter a brave truth teller. My friends at Angels Studio
Speaker 1: are taking this time period and they are transposing the
Speaker 1: events that happened are in the Book of Acts. This
Speaker 1: is where Luke went back and investigated, Hey, how did
Speaker 1: this all get started? How did you guys build this church?
Speaker 1: And Jesus told them to build a church, or they
Speaker 1: would not have done it. So he's taken the Book
Speaker 1: of Acts that Angel Studio series called Testament, and they've
Speaker 1: relocated it into our time, or a time like ours,
Speaker 1: where there is a censorship state, where there is a
Speaker 1: surveillance state, and where people hate truth. Now you get to,
Speaker 1: in this incredible series follow Philip and John and eventually
Speaker 1: Paul and even Mary. They've written into this. I love
Speaker 1: that because I don't think Mary just went away.
Speaker 4: And you follow them as they build.
Speaker 1: This church and they do it against these odds. This
Speaker 1: is not safe Christian filmmaking. It's not emotionally safe for
Speaker 1: some people because it's going to cause you to question
Speaker 1: your commitment. Do you actually stand for Jesus against all odds?
Speaker 1: You can stream Testament right now. Go to Angel dot
Speaker 1: com slash Todd and become a Premium Angel Studio Guild member.
Speaker 1: You'll get to stream Testament immediately. You'll get two free
Speaker 1: tickets to every theatrical release that Angel puts out, and
Speaker 1: you'll get to vote on the stories that they distribute
Speaker 1: and promote and thus continue to change Hollywood. It's angel
Speaker 1: dot com slash Todd. So Chris Murphy says that we
Speaker 1: are living in this era of censorship or leaning into
Speaker 1: one of government censorship. Of course we can give him
Speaker 1: some examples and we can and will. Rather of real
Speaker 1: censorship that was not questioned that. We know the government
Speaker 1: work to censor people. We know they use the power
Speaker 1: of the intelligence services to censor Americans on social media.
Speaker 1: We know that Chris Murphy was fine with that because
Speaker 1: he never called it out.
Speaker 2: He was a.
Speaker 1: Senator then, he's a senator now. He could have called
Speaker 1: it out then and now he didn't. We know that
Speaker 1: the ridiculous DOJ under President Trump and the part time
Speaker 1: Attorney Generaler Pambondi hasn't yet dismissed or got offered to
Speaker 1: pay Alex Berenson the Barnson suit proceeds. She hasn't offered
Speaker 1: to settle this thing. Berenson was censored by the government
Speaker 1: through social media. He had his account taken down because
Speaker 1: the government and well Frankly, a pharma executive acting on
Speaker 1: behalf of government and Pharma insisted that it be taken down.
Speaker 1: And this was under the previous ownership group, Jack Dorsey's
Speaker 1: group of Twitter. So here's how Fox News reported this
Speaker 1: a platform. Colbert's Late Show was reportedly losing CBS forty
Speaker 1: million a year, as critics speculate politics drove cancelation. Liber
Speaker 1: critics cry foul, But CBS Late Night show reportedly had
Speaker 1: a budget north of one hundred million dollars.
Speaker 3: We just said that on Fox News.
Speaker 1: President Trump has been criticized on the Twitter platform. President
Speaker 1: Trump has been criticized. Tucker Cralston has done it. Elon
Speaker 1: Musk has done it. Is it getting shut down or
Speaker 1: is that impossible? Trump has no power there. Brian Stelter
Speaker 1: of CNN Fame, he weighed into this with his analysis.
Speaker 6: A country where you can't lamb who in a sitting
Speaker 6: president is not a free country. A country where you
Speaker 6: can't publish editorial cartoons or have late night monologues or
Speaker 6: have satires about the president is not a democratic country.
Speaker 6: Of course, We're not there. We're not there at all.
Speaker 6: Right now, there are right now there and lots of
Speaker 6: figures who are famous for mocking and deriding President Trump.
Speaker 6: But the idea that Colbert might be taken off the air,
Speaker 6: that his voice might be silenced, it certainly is creating
Speaker 6: a little bit of a chill in the air today.
Speaker 1: Danna you see him super chilled?
Speaker 3: Brian, You're in a network that.
Speaker 1: Continues to insist that President Trump was not not targeted
Speaker 1: by the Intelligent Services the same week that Gabby until
Speaker 1: Si Gabbert released this data that now is what the
Speaker 1: young people would call the receipts showing that in fact,
Speaker 1: Susan Rice and brock Usine, Obama and the entire cadre
Speaker 1: of those people, the Intelligent Services, the FBI, they all
Speaker 1: targeted a president elect in a rolling coup attempt. And
Speaker 1: you guys at CNN have yet to really report on this.
Speaker 1: You work at a network that carried water for Biden,
Speaker 1: the figureheads as he was clearly mentally declined, and you
Speaker 1: pretended otherwise. You worked at that network, you still do.
Speaker 1: You took a break and he came back, he got
Speaker 1: fired and rehired. Were you fired because of the people
Speaker 1: who ran Joe Biden or because you were ineffective? You
Speaker 1: don't have anyone show, but now you're a commentator so
Speaker 1: this is a very scary vision where you can't, let's say,
Speaker 1: be an entertainer, or let's just say this a rodeo clown.
Speaker 1: One of the advantages of being an old guy who's
Speaker 1: worked in media long time is you can have a
Speaker 1: memory of things because they're funny. Daniel Arkin and Aaron
Speaker 1: mcclamm and NBC News. The rodeo clown at the Missouri
Speaker 1: State Fair who on Saturday wore a mask of President
Speaker 1: Barack Obama has been permanently banned from performing at the fair.
Speaker 1: Ever again, according to.
Speaker 4: Fair officials, why because he's black.
Speaker 3: It was racism, that's why.
Speaker 1: So this guy's a rodeo clown, not a platform. And
Speaker 1: you don't remember this, do you remember when the White
Speaker 1: House used the power of their money, of their position,
Speaker 1: and the Democratic National Committee in concert with them. This
Speaker 1: clearly came from brock husein Obama. This was clearly an
Speaker 1: Olynsk tactic, a Lynsky tactic. Pick a target, isolated, cut
Speaker 1: it off from as support base. This comes from again,
Speaker 1: an NBC News article out of Washington, d C. Dems
Speaker 1: released finalists for anti Rush billboard slogan. The Democrat National
Speaker 1: Committee is chosen final slogans in its anti Limbaugh billboard contest,
Speaker 1: one of which trash talk radio host Rush Limbaugh on
Speaker 1: a giant slap in the face from the DNC while
Speaker 1: posting the conservative's hometown. The DNC sent a letter to
Speaker 1: its members last week asking for phrases, if ten words
Speaker 1: or less, to splash across a billboard the displayed in
Speaker 1: Limbo's town of West Pombi's, Florida, as close to Limba's
Speaker 1: backyard as they can get. The five slogans the DNCA
Speaker 1: chose are in no particular order. America didn't vote for
Speaker 1: rush to fail. Hope and change cannot be rushed. Failure
Speaker 1: is not an option for America's future. We can fix America.
Speaker 1: Don't rush it and rush say yes to America. The
Speaker 1: conservative Limbos ad list said last week that he hope
Speaker 1: Barack Obama's administration will fail and blasted Obama administration since
Speaker 1: the president took office in January.
Speaker 4: It didn't stop there. They took these billboards out at.
Speaker 1: The same time as Media Matters for America, which is
Speaker 1: a leftist funded group. It has big money, dark money backgrounds.
Speaker 1: They took the billboard approach and they jumped onto this
Speaker 1: and they began to call Rush limbas advertisers, and they
Speaker 1: began to threaten them. They began to threaten them with
Speaker 1: mass boycotts. They created an attempt to threaten the affiliates.
Speaker 1: There was an FCC attempt to reach out to the
Speaker 1: affiliates to pressure them to take Rush off the air.
Speaker 1: They did this or attempted to do this to the
Speaker 1: world's most successful radio talk show host in history. There
Speaker 1: will never be another Limbaugh. Rogan and Tucker Carlson are
Speaker 1: the now Limbaughs of podcasting, but they'll never be another
Speaker 1: guy like Russian Live radio.
Speaker 3: So how did Limbaugh respond to this?
Speaker 4: Oh, he carped.
Speaker 1: He said it was government censorship. What Rush Limbaugh said
Speaker 1: was one of the most monumental moments in radio. And
Speaker 1: despite having filled in for Rush abou one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty times, we never were able to find the audio
Speaker 1: of this or isolated, although everybody remembers Rush saying it.
Speaker 1: When this effort began and they were trying to get
Speaker 1: Rush taken off the air, trying to separate him from
Speaker 1: his advertisers, Rush went to the air and he said
Speaker 1: this roughly paraphrasing, you know a President Obama, I don't
Speaker 1: fear you. I've been preparing my.
Speaker 3: Whole life for a person like you.
Speaker 1: If I decide this gets serious enough, I have a
Speaker 1: place I can go where you can't touch me. But
Speaker 1: that's not to happen. You're using an Olinsky tactic. Pick
Speaker 1: a target, isolated, cut it off from a support base.
Speaker 1: But you don't understand. My support base is not my advertisers.
Speaker 1: My support base is my audience, and you cannot separate us.
Speaker 1: There's nothing you can do to affect that. I have
Speaker 1: an idea. I have an idea. Why don't Why don't
Speaker 1: you fly down on air Force one and no, le
Speaker 1: let me take that back. I will dispatch EIB one
Speaker 1: to come and pick you up and fly you down
Speaker 1: because it's a nicer airplane. In fact, I'll fly up,
Speaker 1: we'll fly down together, and that way I can tell
Speaker 1: you what it's like to own your own airplane rather
Speaker 1: than having one provided for you at taxpayer expense. We
Speaker 1: can come down here and talk about all the ways.
Speaker 1: I am not afraid of you. There's nothing you can
Speaker 1: take from me.
Speaker 4: I prepared my whole life.
Speaker 3: For someone like you.
Speaker 1: The Elinsky tactics won't work with me because my audience
Speaker 1: is my support base, not my advertisers. Within at most
Speaker 1: a week, the billboards were gone, the phone calls to
Speaker 1: radio stations were gone, the threatening of advertisers was over.
Speaker 1: And they tried this again later in Russia's career, when
Speaker 1: Rush spoke about one of the most vicious, obvious setups
Speaker 1: in the history of the Mockingbird media that Brian Stelter
Speaker 1: says is being threatened with being shut down by President
Speaker 1: Trump when they set up the Sandra Fluck herrings. If
Speaker 1: you don't know who Sandra Fluck is, she was a
Speaker 1: trust fund baby who was, as I recall, she was
Speaker 1: engaged to be married to another.
Speaker 3: Trust fund baby. They did a fake hearing on Capitol Hill.
Speaker 1: They pretended it was a hearing, but it wasn't because
Speaker 1: there weren't Republicans there. They did it in a hearing room,
Speaker 1: and Sandra Fluck pretended she had to choose between eating
Speaker 1: dinner and having birth control. Fact is, there's free birth
Speaker 1: control all around Washington, DC, provided by taxpayers. She didn't
Speaker 1: need that to make that decision, but.
Speaker 3: She said it. In the next day George Stefanopolis or
Speaker 3: sometime that week.
Speaker 1: The next step that week, George Stefanopolis asked the hapless
Speaker 1: mett Romney, do you agree with some of your Republican
Speaker 1: colleagues that women shouldn't have access to birth control or prophylactics?
Speaker 1: And poor hapless mett Romney said, George, I don't know
Speaker 1: what you're talking about. He didn't laugh at his face.
Speaker 4: It was a setup.
Speaker 1: And Rush Limbaugh called Sandra Fluck a very rude name,
Speaker 1: that one I would call a woman. And it embarrassed
Speaker 1: me that Rush did it. They tried to take him
Speaker 1: out again and again they failed. And they tried that
Speaker 1: at the governmental level, and again it failed. This was
Speaker 1: an obvious attempt. There was also the obvious attempt to
Speaker 1: shut down Americans free speech, just normal, everyday Americans.
Speaker 3: It's happened to me.
Speaker 1: The disappearance of my Facebook audience, the disappearance of my
Speaker 1: Twitter audience, and one day I lost a couple hundred
Speaker 1: thousand followers on Twitter. But I didn't have John Stuart
Speaker 1: to stand behind me. And John Stewart now stood behind
Speaker 1: and Stephen Colbert in a brilliant bit of commentary, so brilliant,
Speaker 1: way were down.
Speaker 7: We're going down, let me We're get down, so funny,
Speaker 7: just go out everybody the outrage.
Speaker 1: So John Stewart's response here shows, of course that President
Speaker 1: Trump owns the Daily Show because as you know, John
Speaker 1: Sewart's program has been taken getting off the air.
Speaker 3: Well, no it hasn't. The attempts to shut down.
Speaker 1: Free speech came from the Democrats and came from the
Speaker 1: Mockingbird media with their enthusiastic endorsement of shutting people off
Speaker 1: of social media. Colbert's program was losing too much money
Speaker 1: and CBS couldn't handle it. It's really that symbol stery
Speaker 1: number two, Juries without souls. This is this is closer
Speaker 1: than people think, and it really matters to society. And
Speaker 1: you may think you never will stand in front of
Speaker 1: a jury, and God willing, maybe you won't. But we're
Speaker 1: going to see jury trials continue, we would hope, unless
Speaker 1: we do get to a point where there's a complete
Speaker 1: shutdown of any sort of democratic processes in our democratic
Speaker 1: Republic of America. But this is so close that my
Speaker 1: friend Briannas sent this to me. I hadn't heard of
Speaker 1: this Juries without a soul, And here's.
Speaker 3: What I mean.
Speaker 1: How about an AI instead of a jury of your peers.
Speaker 1: This is being contemplated in the.
Speaker 8: UK, there are more than seventy five thousand cases waiting
Speaker 8: to go to trial, the most there's ever been. Sir
Speaker 8: Brian Levison has been asked to sort it out.
Speaker 9: You've got to go through the whole system and try
Speaker 9: to improve it, not only so that we no longer
Speaker 9: have an increasing backlog, but that we can eat in
Speaker 9: to the backlog and reduce it to a level that
Speaker 9: is acceptable, so that trials can take place within a
Speaker 9: reasonable period of.
Speaker 8: Time, potentially lower prison sentences if the defendant pleads guilty
Speaker 8: at the first opportunity. The government has said it will
Speaker 8: now go through the recommendations and bring in new laws
Speaker 8: in the autumn, but there are already concerns about a
Speaker 8: reduction in the use of juries, which have been part
Speaker 8: of the justice system since the Middle Ages. Paula Harriet
Speaker 8: runs a charity that supports those with criminal records.
Speaker 10: I do worry about that. That is one of the
Speaker 10: concerns that I have about the review, That defendants won't
Speaker 10: have the opportunity for a trial in front of their peers,
Speaker 10: and that'll be in the hands of people who maybe
Speaker 10: don't have the same level of proximity to the issues
Speaker 10: as members of the public do.
Speaker 8: Modern trials are taking longer, and delays caused by COVID
Speaker 8: haven't helped. The government asked for plans for bold reform
Speaker 8: and now need to decide which of Sir Brian's plans
Speaker 8: should pass through Parliament and enter the courts.
Speaker 9: I respect juries, and I admire the conscientious way in
Speaker 9: which they go about their business, but that it can't
Speaker 9: be right that all cases, however large or small, necessarily
Speaker 9: get that treatment. As somebody has said, it may be
Speaker 9: that a jury system is Rolls Royce, but if there
Speaker 9: are many cars on the road road, the Rolls Royce
Speaker 9: isn't moving.
Speaker 3: And so AI.
Speaker 1: Using AI for a jury to replace human beings this
Speaker 1: is an idea they fancy. Now, the fact of the
Speaker 1: matter is this, you cannot replace human beings with AI.
Speaker 1: AI cannot feel, It cannot assess emotion.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it can.
Speaker 1: Read keywords, it can look at body language, but it
Speaker 1: cannot sense a fellow human being. I don't know about you,
Speaker 1: but I know I can sense the presence of another
Speaker 1: human being. There's been tests to prove this that human
Speaker 1: beings bond. Even in a short while in an airplane,
Speaker 1: you can begin to sense the mood of a person,
Speaker 1: because we are, in fact all from God, Creator is
Speaker 1: an image, and he loves us. The very notion of
Speaker 1: an AI jury should terrify everybody, because ais right now
Speaker 1: don't create themselves. They will and that should be frightening enough.
Speaker 1: But what an AI actually does is amalgamate as much
Speaker 1: has been written or SAIDs or produced about a topic
Speaker 1: into a database so that it can appear to be
Speaker 1: providing intelligence answers. There's been nothing written about you. If
Speaker 1: you're in your first ever jury trial, there's nothing about you.
Speaker 1: There's a very limited data set. It's going to make
Speaker 1: a decision based upon that.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: The very idea that this is being contemplated is also
Speaker 1: a sign of how far the courts have gotten off track.
Speaker 1: In Britain, there are people on trial for posting a
Speaker 1: Facebook note criticizing immigration as a policy, not even using
Speaker 1: racist language, simply saying this is what you get with
Speaker 1: mass migration. There are people on trial because they burned
Speaker 1: a Koran. So maybe what the UK should do is say,
Speaker 1: why are we having so many people in the justice
Speaker 1: system for things like this that are in fact protected
Speaker 1: free speech Even in Britain. All of it's very, very
Speaker 1: sick and look, there's tons of reasons to be amused
Speaker 1: by AI but also terrified of what AI can do.
Speaker 1: I'm going to show you example that is on one end,
Speaker 1: very very very funny, on the other end terrifying, but
Speaker 1: also indicative of someone who.
Speaker 3: Might need a jury of his peers.
Speaker 1: And that's Barack Hussein. Obama might need a jury of
Speaker 1: his peers if he wants to remain free. Now, if
Speaker 1: you're in business, you take a lot of steps to
Speaker 1: make sure that you protect your business. I'm sure that
Speaker 1: you train your employees well. If you're in the trucking business,
Speaker 1: I bet you're making sure that you're employees know how
Speaker 1: to drive. I mean, if you're in a business like landscaping,
Speaker 1: and I bet you make sure that the guys who
Speaker 1: drive your trucks are safe drivers, or you're in a
Speaker 1: uber business, et cetera, whatever it is, I bet you
Speaker 1: take care. And if something does happen, let's say that
Speaker 1: there's a lawsuit. Let's say one of your drivers made
Speaker 1: a mistake like this. Thank god, no ambulance chasing lawyer
Speaker 1: or even in this case, decent lawyer could go after your.
Speaker 3: Home or your retirement account. They'd have to go sue
Speaker 3: your business.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe there are a lot of businesses who think
Speaker 1: they have that firewall and they don't. A lot of
Speaker 1: business owners who think they have it. I've had friends
Speaker 1: of mine who had their tax accountants team up with
Speaker 1: their tax lawyers to start their corporations or their LOCs
Speaker 1: in businesses like boat sails repair, rental, in businesses like
Speaker 1: home rentals, in businesses like landscaping. When they went to
Speaker 1: gobisible dot com that's g go bisible with a Z,
Speaker 1: go bisible dot com. When they went to go bisible
Speaker 1: and they got the free no obligation consultation, they were
Speaker 1: shocked to find out they didn't have any corporate firewall
Speaker 1: at all. Their businesses are them, and any first year
Speaker 1: lawyer could go look up those papers and find out, oh,
Speaker 1: you know what, we don't just have to sue the business.
Speaker 1: We can sue them for their house and the retirement account.
Speaker 1: Brian and his team at go bisible will give you
Speaker 1: the same free no consultation, no obligation consultation, and they'll
Speaker 1: tell you if you have that firewall set up. If
Speaker 1: you don't, go bisible will take care of it in
Speaker 1: seven easy steps.
Speaker 3: So go get your free.
Speaker 1: Consultation today, there's no obligation, and hey, if you do
Speaker 1: have the firewall, then you got peace of mind.
Speaker 3: So there is absolutely nothing to lose.
Speaker 1: Go bisible with the z go bisible dot com. Now,
Speaker 1: this is on one hand, very very amusing. In another hand,
Speaker 1: it's definitely a warning shot to Brock Hossein Obama, but
Speaker 1: it's also a reason that people might need juries, even
Speaker 1: someone like Barack Husain Obama, the future of MAGA.
Speaker 3: Who's come into the UH.
Speaker 1: This is so well done. They're handcuffing the fact that
Speaker 1: AI can create.
Speaker 3: This is just frightening.
Speaker 1: FBI agents appear to be handcuffing Barack Obama.
Speaker 3: And there's Trump.
Speaker 1: Laughing by now President Trump in a cell. Now, we
Speaker 1: don't do this to presidents.
Speaker 3: We never arrest presidents. So well done.
Speaker 1: And it's AI driven now number one that should in
Speaker 1: fact put a great big warning sign in our hearts.
Speaker 1: If it can be made about Obama, it can be
Speaker 1: made about you, and it can be made about you,
Speaker 1: can be made about anybody. But if Barack Obama went trial,
Speaker 1: if he was arrested and actually chose to go to
Speaker 1: trial or actually didn't settle, would you want him to
Speaker 1: be heard by an AI or would you want actual
Speaker 1: human beings involved in hearing that case and making that decision?
Speaker 1: For me, I would never put up with an AI jury.
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe don't have a choice except this. It's
Speaker 1: just a temporary jury. They can create all the AI
Speaker 1: juries they want. The only jury that matters in etrinity
Speaker 1: is the most intelligence, intelligence that has ever existed and
Speaker 1: ever will exist, because it's always existed and always will
Speaker 1: That is God Almighty. So, though the times get scary,
Speaker 1: though this looks again like end time stuff, though this
Speaker 1: looks again like Book of Revelation, let's rest in this.
Speaker 3: We know the ultimate.
Speaker 1: Judge, and we know his character because God's character is
Speaker 1: perfect and loving and just.
Speaker 3: So let's take that to heart.
Speaker 1: Story number three. There's an old saying, when nothing is forbidden,
Speaker 1: everything is allowed. And this is one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why we though it's societally painful, though it can lose
Speaker 1: us friends, it can lose this access to family. We
Speaker 1: have to stand.
Speaker 3: By the word of God.
Speaker 1: We need to do it compassionately, tell truth wrapped in grace.
Speaker 1: But when you start to depart from the word of
Speaker 1: God on a selective basis such as this scripture.
Speaker 4: Is very hard.
Speaker 1: This hurts my friend's feelings, so I cannot apply it.
Speaker 1: You've opened the door to everything being allowed. I happen
Speaker 1: to adore the teaching of Alistair Beg. I happen to
Speaker 1: adore his storytelling. I think he is a man after
Speaker 1: God's own heart, and I differ with him on how
Speaker 1: he would on how he plans to treat an invitation
Speaker 1: to a same sex wedding. It utterly ruins me emotionally
Speaker 1: to know that I may one day need to say
Speaker 1: to friends, I'm sorry, I cannot come to your wedding.
Speaker 1: I can come to the after party if you'll have me,
Speaker 1: though you probably won't. I can tell you I love
Speaker 1: you each individually, and I do. And I cannot come
Speaker 1: because my faith prohibits me from celebrating something that my
Speaker 1: faith and the Bible clearly calls sin. I could not
Speaker 1: go and celebrate a friend's fornication. I could not go
Speaker 1: and celebrate a friend's adultery anymore that I can go
Speaker 1: celebrate the sin of a same sex union. Now, in
Speaker 1: the case of adultery a fornication, it's not gonna hurt
Speaker 1: my feelings to say, dude, I can't celebrate that in
Speaker 1: the case of the same sex wedding, it would because
Speaker 1: these people have been told if folks will not join
Speaker 1: you at this point of view, they hate you.
Speaker 3: It's not true.
Speaker 4: It's a savage lie, it's a gross lie.
Speaker 1: It's a lie straight from the enemy. Because God does
Speaker 1: not hate humanity. God loves us and is creating these
Speaker 1: rules for our own good. So Alister bag weighed in on
Speaker 1: this controversy around the Christians. What do they chip and
Speaker 1: join the gains? They invited a same sex so called
Speaker 1: married couple to be on their family show.
Speaker 11: Alister bag I said, well, here's the thing, you're not
Speaker 11: going to. Your love for them may catch them off guard,
Speaker 11: but your absence will simply reinforce the fact that they said,
Speaker 11: these people are what I always thought, judgmental, critical, unprepared
Speaker 11: to count and and say any thing. And it is
Speaker 11: a fancy. It is a fine line, isn't it. It
Speaker 11: really is, And people need to work out their own
Speaker 11: salvation with fear and trembling. But I think we're going
Speaker 11: to take that risk. We're gonna have to take that
Speaker 11: risk a lot more if we want to build bridges
Speaker 11: into the hearts and lives of those who don't understand
Speaker 11: Jesus and don't understand that he is a king.
Speaker 1: Would Jesus attend the wedding? I mean, that's a great question.
Speaker 1: Would Jesus attend the wedding? Did and they said, Rabbi, come,
Speaker 1: come and bless our union.
Speaker 3: Would he? Would he?
Speaker 1: I mean he attended the wedding. He's sitting in the
Speaker 1: front row, in the seat of honor. And now the
Speaker 1: same sex couple says, Rabbi, Jesus, come stand up here
Speaker 1: and bless our union.
Speaker 3: Kenny.
Speaker 1: It is therefore that a man leaves his mother and
Speaker 1: father and clings to his wife, and they become one flesh.
Speaker 1: Jesus said, all the opportunity in the world to say,
Speaker 1: it is therefore that a person leaves his mom and
Speaker 1: dad and clings to his partner or her partner, all
Speaker 1: the opportunity of the world. Just as Jesus said to
Speaker 1: the pharisees, it's not what goes in the body that
Speaker 1: defiles it, but what comes out to speaking of the words,
Speaker 1: the words of condemnation, the words of taking the law
Speaker 1: and using it as a cudgel to hit people to
Speaker 1: be served, as if pharisees were served, make way, the Sadasee,
Speaker 1: the Pharisees coming through the crowds, taxing people to enter
Speaker 1: the temple in a financial swindle. Jesus had the opportunity
Speaker 1: to point to them and say, look, it's not that
Speaker 1: enters the body, it's what leaves it. He had all
Speaker 1: sorts of opportunity to stand and say, hey, guys, everything
Speaker 1: in the New Testament or the Old Testament, everything you
Speaker 1: were taught about same sex unions is wrong.
Speaker 3: It is allowed, it is to be blessed. He didn't.
Speaker 1: It was not an instance of him doing that, nor
Speaker 1: is there an instance of him acting hatefully towards people sinning.
Speaker 1: The closest representation you can get of that is, of course,
Speaker 1: the woman of the well, who was living in a
Speaker 1: marriage that was not an actual marriage, in other words,
Speaker 1: a sin state. He called that out, and he treated
Speaker 1: her respectfully, in fact, very respectfully, so respectfully that he
Speaker 1: spoke to her alone as a rabbi and a Jewish man.
Speaker 3: That was not to be done.
Speaker 1: The woman who was about to be stoned, and Jesus
Speaker 1: went and said that he was without sin cast the
Speaker 1: first stone. And then he told her to go and
Speaker 1: sit no more, neither do I condemn me. Your sins
Speaker 1: are forgiven, go and sin no more. He didn't act
Speaker 1: hatefully towards her, nor can we. But when everything is forbidden,
Speaker 1: nothing is allowed, and slippery slopes are real. And Satan
Speaker 1: gets on these slippery slopes and greases them and makes
Speaker 1: them even more slick as people slide down into actual
Speaker 1: blasphemous statements from a pulpit. My friend, the brother Zach Abraham,
Speaker 1: the chief investments are Bulwark Capital Management, will have a
Speaker 1: discussion with you, in fact, a series of discussions for free,
Speaker 1: no obligation. You back out at any time. I encourage
Speaker 1: you to, not encourage you go through the process. First
Speaker 1: discussion online, video, telephone, call, in person, whatever you like.
Speaker 1: Is about getting to know each other. Is this a
Speaker 1: guy you want to spend time with, because if he's
Speaker 1: going to be managing your money, you're gonna want to
Speaker 1: spend time with them. Meeting number two is to talk
Speaker 1: about your specific hardcore needs for retirement. Do you still
Speaker 1: have kids? You have grown kids who need help with
Speaker 1: Do you have businesses you own you want to roll
Speaker 1: those up? Are you diversified? Are you risk managed? Are
Speaker 1: your accounts actively managed? ZAC will tell you that and
Speaker 1: then the third meeting, he'll come back and his team
Speaker 1: and he will present to you what they think they
Speaker 1: can do for you. It might be that they might
Speaker 1: just come along and say, hey, you know what you're set.
Speaker 1: You're set, go retire, you don't need us. Well done.
Speaker 1: It might be that they come back and say, you
Speaker 1: are way way overexposed to risk and you are not
Speaker 1: being actively managed, and here's what we think we can
Speaker 1: do for you. This is a free service and there
Speaker 1: is no obligation, so go register for it at Know
Speaker 1: Your Riskpodcast dot com. That's kanow Know Your Riskpodcast dot com.
Speaker 1: Investment Advisors services off through Truck Financial llcn SEC register
Speaker 1: Investment Advisor. Investments involve risk and are not guaranteed. Past
Speaker 1: performance doesn't guarantee future results. Truck twenty five Dash two
Speaker 1: five to two. When everything whether, when nothing is forbidden,
Speaker 1: everything is allowed. And when you start taking bits of
Speaker 1: God's word and saying this is inconvenient and hurtful, I'm
Speaker 1: not going to speak it, I'm not going to follow it,
Speaker 1: you can end up in positions like this. This comes
Speaker 1: from Jubilee Episcopal Church.
Speaker 12: God does not call me by name. There is no
Speaker 12: bright white light beaming out of the heavens and booming
Speaker 12: voice bellowing out my parents' words. No, God does not
Speaker 12: call me by name. She calls me baby, or love
Speaker 12: or sweetheart. Low and slow, like golden honey dripping out
Speaker 12: of a beehive, soft like late afternoon sun over Texas fields,
Speaker 12: southern and drawling and home. God calls me like the
Speaker 12: old woman in the gay club, hunched over at the
Speaker 12: end of the bar, watching all the boys and queens
Speaker 12: twirl from a distance. Lines etched into her face from
Speaker 12: too much life, hair crop shore, and men's clothes growing
Speaker 12: threadbare across her back. God is an old school butch.
Speaker 1: God is an old school butch. The God of the universe,
Speaker 1: who has always existed and always will exist, Who created
Speaker 1: all things, including the quantum physics rules that we observe,
Speaker 1: including DNA and how it works, the computer code, if
Speaker 1: you will, that constructs our bodies and constructs everything else,
Speaker 1: the glory of the heavens, that the planets move as
Speaker 1: they should in these insane orbits. He designed all of this,
Speaker 1: and he left his word, his word written by men
Speaker 1: inspired by God, and in that word he described to
Speaker 1: us how we are to love one another. We're to
Speaker 1: love our family members different than we are our husbands
Speaker 1: or our wives. We're to love our friends different from them.
Speaker 1: And there is a love obtainable by very very few,
Speaker 1: but givable by God because He embodies it. Those lines
Speaker 1: are not to be crossed. God is not an old
Speaker 1: school butch God is the Lord of the universe, the
Speaker 1: creator of all mankind everything in it. And God does
Speaker 1: not allow the end result of sin. In the New
Speaker 1: Heaven and the New Earth. There will be no disagreement,
Speaker 1: there will be no desertion of God's word in the
Speaker 1: New Heaven and New Earth, because God will not have
Speaker 1: the New Heaven and the New Earth polluted the way
Speaker 1: it had been by the human sin problem.
Speaker 4: That's at the core of this horrible.
Speaker 3: Thing that happens.
Speaker 1: When people start taking bits of God's word and saying
Speaker 1: that part hurts, so I'm not going to follow it.
Speaker 1: You can end up committing blasphemy like that young bone
Speaker 1: just did. So guard yourself against it by standing on
Speaker 1: the firm foundation of God's word, even the hard parts.
Speaker 3: This is the Todd Hermannshaw.
Speaker 1: Please go be well, be strong, be kind, and please
Speaker 1: make a decision to walk in the light of Christ.
Speaker 1: And join me in celebrating that I get to go
Speaker 1: home and see my beloved wife