Speaker 1: I like asking questions. The fun begins when you start
researching for answers such as why has false compassion become
so widely accepted? Plus does the government rely on chaos
to control the public. My name is Errol. I'm a
daily writer, a silent wolf. I stand on the sidelines
and do nothing but watch, listen, study, and then activate.
I happen to call it the daily Mess, a chronological
walk through an everyday world. Yeah, it's my morning writing
as a receiver of thoughts and ideas. We as people
tend to throw things to the side because we think
we're going to deal with it later on. Yeah, okay,
let me know when you get back to that. Okay, Well,
when a subject arrives inside of me, I know it's
time to dig in. It's still keeping that daily journal,
but by doing the research, the picture becomes clearer. This
is the daily Mess. Why has false compassion become accepted
as authentic behavior? False compassion when a person pretends to
care or share concern, but in the end it isn't
genuine or since and it's mainly a selfish reason. Mental
health experts say false compassion isn't a real feeling of empathy.
It's looked upon as being the performance or a tactic.
Many see it as a form of manipulation. Why is
it looked upon as being a negative because it creates
an erosion in trust. Saying you'll pray for someone and
you don't actually hinders the authentic connection. I see someone's
hello by way of asking how are you doing? As
a false compassion, do you really care about how someone
is doing? It distracts from real solutions. If someone's truly
having a rough time and you ask, hey, how you doing,
continue to help them? If you can't know, your false
compassion is seen as your gain and not for those
in need. It can actually put you in a place
of making that walk away rather than walking towards someone
on a new path. Hey, coming up next? Is the
government relying on chaos to control the people? Hey? Thanks
for coming back to the daily mess? Is the government
relying on chaos to control people? I mean, it's the
talk of so many circles, like the term wag the dog,
which is diverting our attention away from the real problem.
It's looked upon as being a conspiracy theory. Really, the
government controlling chaos to control people is a conspiracy theory.
There's no credible evidence in the idea that the government
is actually creating chaos to control us. Many many people
who study government behavior believe such a thought lacks evidence.
Even authoritarian governments don't use chaos to create stability. Creating
widespread chaos would undermine the government's authority and ability. Nobody
wants counterproductive conflict and instability are everywhere. The government can
be drawn into the conflict or fail to address issues,
leading to chaos. Historians say the government can contribute or
exploit instables, but the idea of them deliberately creating chaos
to control the population is not supported by evidence. Therefore,
it is written off as being a misconception. Making yourself
aware of such decision making should be an inspiration to
create your own voice. Hi'm Mariyl, and that's the daily mess.