WEBVTT

1
00:00:05.280 --> 00:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to a special episode of the JavaScript

2
00:00:08.839 --> 00:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Jobber podcast. Today, I'm flying solo as a host, Dan Shapiro,

3
00:00:13.080 --> 00:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>coming to you from Tel Aviv. But I've got plenty

4
00:00:15.800 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>of guests with me, Ariel Schulmann, Lead Josef and de

5
00:00:20.359 --> 00:00:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Viota Alush, and together we're going to have this really

6
00:00:24.519 --> 00:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting discussion. I think about public speaking, speaking at conferences,

7
00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>speaking at any venue where you can talk about tech,

8
00:00:34.520 --> 00:00:37.679
<v Speaker 1>what we think about it, how you should go about it,

9
00:00:37.759 --> 00:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the upsides, the downsides, tips and suggestions and whatnot. I

10
00:00:43.320 --> 00:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a great conversation. But first

11
00:00:46.679 --> 00:00:51.079
<v Speaker 1>let me I'll let you introduce yourself. So ladies first,

12
00:00:51.119 --> 00:00:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Darrielle please go.

13
00:00:53.240 --> 00:00:54.399
<v Speaker 2>Liad please go.

14
00:00:54.840 --> 00:00:57.039
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Ariel.

15
00:00:58.679 --> 00:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, here's my friend. I'm Al and I'm Mary.

16
00:01:01.240 --> 00:01:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm a full stack developer at elmex I've.

17
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Been I think I did my first conference.

18
00:01:08.359 --> 00:01:14.239
<v Speaker 3>Three years ago and very passionate about it and have

19
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:18.200
<v Speaker 3>a few upcoming conferences also this week this year, sorry

20
00:01:18.280 --> 00:01:25.239
<v Speaker 3>not this week, and I think that's it also coming

21
00:01:25.359 --> 00:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>live from.

22
00:01:25.840 --> 00:01:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Theelvi Yeah, Tel Avi is the place to be today.

23
00:01:28.920 --> 00:01:33.799
<v Speaker 1>We are all Israeli on this podcast, so I hope

24
00:01:34.280 --> 00:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it works. Well, anyway, Leads, how about you yourself. You've

25
00:01:40.079 --> 00:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>You've given some of the best talks I've heard. I

26
00:01:42.560 --> 00:01:46.079
<v Speaker 1>have to say I've listened to you, for example at

27
00:01:46.079 --> 00:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Reversing conference. You always give these amazing talks. So

28
00:01:51.319 --> 00:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>please describe yourself as in general and as a public speaker.

29
00:01:55.680 --> 00:01:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so, first of all, yeah, thank you. I'm lead.

30
00:01:58.879 --> 00:02:05.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm currently a principal engineering Shopify. I've been in companies

31
00:02:05.599 --> 00:02:08.800
<v Speaker 4>like Douda. I've been a consultant to too many companies,

32
00:02:08.840 --> 00:02:12.840
<v Speaker 4>and one of my patients is public speaking and specifically

33
00:02:12.879 --> 00:02:16.719
<v Speaker 4>tech public speaking. I think I gave my I gave

34
00:02:16.759 --> 00:02:19.840
<v Speaker 4>my first talk at the conference about six years ago,

35
00:02:19.960 --> 00:02:22.479
<v Speaker 4>and it started. I gave talks and meetups before that

36
00:02:23.439 --> 00:02:28.080
<v Speaker 4>and ever since. I'm trying to give really entertaining talsic conferences.

37
00:02:28.120 --> 00:02:31.960
<v Speaker 4>So we'll probably dive into that later. And yeah, added

38
00:02:31.960 --> 00:02:34.800
<v Speaker 4>than that, I am also coming like from Tel Aviv

39
00:02:35.039 --> 00:02:39.360
<v Speaker 4>right now, and again, public sticking is one of my hobbies.

40
00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:40.280
<v Speaker 4>So I'm looking forward.

41
00:02:40.080 --> 00:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>To any any upcoming talk conferences that you scheduled to

42
00:02:45.719 --> 00:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>speak at.

43
00:02:47.400 --> 00:02:49.280
<v Speaker 4>There are there are a few, actually this year. I'm

44
00:02:49.319 --> 00:02:52.719
<v Speaker 4>in the content committee of a lot of conferences, and

45
00:02:52.759 --> 00:02:57.960
<v Speaker 4>there are also a few meetups and private company lectures

46
00:02:57.960 --> 00:03:00.240
<v Speaker 4>that I'm giving in the in the coming months.

47
00:03:01.240 --> 00:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh we don't count tails. Yeah, okay, cool and a viata.

48
00:03:08.240 --> 00:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>How about you.

49
00:03:09.360 --> 00:03:12.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm Avatar. I'm a software engineer at Meta for the

50
00:03:12.280 --> 00:03:16.039
<v Speaker 5>past five years or so a little bit more, and

51
00:03:17.120 --> 00:03:20.360
<v Speaker 5>also a public speaker. Been speaking in conferences on and

52
00:03:20.360 --> 00:03:24.039
<v Speaker 5>off for the past six years, almost six years. First

53
00:03:24.080 --> 00:03:28.599
<v Speaker 5>conference was in twenty nineteen. You mentioned Reversing conference, so

54
00:03:28.719 --> 00:03:30.639
<v Speaker 5>that was the first one I spoke. I spoke at

55
00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:34.080
<v Speaker 5>Reversing twenty nineteen, so yeah, that's pretty cool. And I

56
00:03:34.080 --> 00:03:35.919
<v Speaker 5>also have a few upcoming this year as well.

57
00:03:37.479 --> 00:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>That's nice. So also I'll introduce myself as a speaker.

58
00:03:41.080 --> 00:03:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm older than all of you, so I've been speaking

59
00:03:43.680 --> 00:03:49.639
<v Speaker 1>for longer together. Yeah, not quite, not quite that old,

60
00:03:49.719 --> 00:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I think I spoke at a conference

61
00:03:53.520 --> 00:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>for the first time approximately twenty years ago, probably before

62
00:03:57.520 --> 00:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yell was born.

63
00:03:58.960 --> 00:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Um, I was starting elementary school.

64
00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:09.199
<v Speaker 1>I've I'm currently principal engineer at some Sense. I also

65
00:04:09.479 --> 00:04:15.639
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy public speaking. This year, I've got three upcoming talks.

66
00:04:15.759 --> 00:04:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll be speaking at JS Heroes in Romania in about

67
00:04:20.759 --> 00:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a month, and I'm also speaking at React next and

68
00:04:25.160 --> 00:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>at no TLV two conferences here in Tel Aviv, and

69
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I've got some submitted cfps, so you know, keeping my

70
00:04:32.600 --> 00:04:37.879
<v Speaker 1>finger crossed for some additional talks. We will see anyway.

71
00:04:38.199 --> 00:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So now that we've all introduced ourselves and we can

72
00:04:41.279 --> 00:04:46.519
<v Speaker 1>start talking about, you know, conference speaking specifically, I think

73
00:04:46.560 --> 00:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the first question that I want to post to you

74
00:04:49.399 --> 00:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and feel free to answer in whatever order is why

75
00:04:54.879 --> 00:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>why is it that you want to speak at conferences

76
00:04:58.839 --> 00:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that you know you submit to? The conference goes through

77
00:05:01.920 --> 00:05:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the whole challenge of coming up with the talk, what's

78
00:05:04.439 --> 00:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the upside? Why do you actually do it?

79
00:05:06.360 --> 00:05:11.240
<v Speaker 5>It goes first, I can go. I can go because

80
00:05:11.240 --> 00:05:17.120
<v Speaker 5>it's pretty simple. So before even becoming a public speaker,

81
00:05:17.199 --> 00:05:18.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I wanted to be a public speaker for

82
00:05:18.839 --> 00:05:21.759
<v Speaker 5>a long time. But one of the things that I

83
00:05:21.879 --> 00:05:24.519
<v Speaker 5>enjoy doing is working on open source projects. I have

84
00:05:25.240 --> 00:05:27.920
<v Speaker 5>a bunch of open source projects, and I always come

85
00:05:28.000 --> 00:05:30.199
<v Speaker 5>up with more, and it's usually I even spoke about

86
00:05:30.240 --> 00:05:33.279
<v Speaker 5>one of those here on the podcast last year, I think.

87
00:05:34.079 --> 00:05:36.560
<v Speaker 5>And every time we'll working on libraries and tools for

88
00:05:36.600 --> 00:05:40.879
<v Speaker 5>other developed developers, I come up with the challenges that

89
00:05:41.079 --> 00:05:45.319
<v Speaker 5>are non trivial things that the everyday developers don't always

90
00:05:45.439 --> 00:05:48.439
<v Speaker 5>face because they're lower level or they come from a

91
00:05:48.439 --> 00:05:52.680
<v Speaker 5>different paradigm from a product developer, because I build tools

92
00:05:52.720 --> 00:05:56.879
<v Speaker 5>and not products, and sometimes I need to find special

93
00:05:56.920 --> 00:06:00.839
<v Speaker 5>solutions in genius solutions and sometimes even break the rules.

94
00:06:00.879 --> 00:06:05.000
<v Speaker 5>And what I like doing is take the audience with

95
00:06:05.160 --> 00:06:08.879
<v Speaker 5>me on a journey of like a detective story, solving

96
00:06:08.920 --> 00:06:12.480
<v Speaker 5>the same problem that I did, and seeing them experience

97
00:06:12.519 --> 00:06:15.839
<v Speaker 5>the same development and learning journey that I went through.

98
00:06:16.199 --> 00:06:20.040
<v Speaker 5>Is some of the most empowerant things that I enjoy

99
00:06:20.120 --> 00:06:22.040
<v Speaker 5>doing is as a public speaker.

100
00:06:23.360 --> 00:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to take AJ's role a little bit

101
00:06:27.759 --> 00:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that I'm going to push back a

102
00:06:29.399 --> 00:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit on what you just said, because what you

103
00:06:32.839 --> 00:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>described to an extent you kind of corrected at the end,

104
00:06:36.720 --> 00:06:40.439
<v Speaker 1>But to an extent, you described the value that your

105
00:06:40.480 --> 00:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>audience gets from your talk. But I'm actually asking a

106
00:06:45.399 --> 00:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>different question. I'm asking about the value that you derive

107
00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from giving the talk. What is it about public speaking?

108
00:06:55.079 --> 00:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you do it at the end of the day,

109
00:06:57.040 --> 00:06:58.959
<v Speaker 1>We do it for us. I mean, you know, we

110
00:06:59.079 --> 00:07:02.319
<v Speaker 1>obviously like to share. We want to see the industry

111
00:07:02.319 --> 00:07:04.759
<v Speaker 1>move forward. If we can help people that's great, but

112
00:07:05.319 --> 00:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, we let's be honest, we do it for us.

113
00:07:08.360 --> 00:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So what is it about giving public talks that is

114
00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>enjoyable to you?

115
00:07:16.120 --> 00:07:22.879
<v Speaker 5>Of course I do it for the traveling accommodation, no more. Seriously,

116
00:07:23.360 --> 00:07:26.480
<v Speaker 5>it is something that of course I do talk about

117
00:07:26.480 --> 00:07:31.959
<v Speaker 5>my open source projects, mostly to gain attraction to those projects,

118
00:07:31.959 --> 00:07:36.959
<v Speaker 5>to gain visibility to projects, but I also like to

119
00:07:37.160 --> 00:07:40.959
<v Speaker 5>educate the audience about new ways of solving issues. It's

120
00:07:41.000 --> 00:07:43.720
<v Speaker 5>not just for them, it's for me. It's to get

121
00:07:43.759 --> 00:07:47.519
<v Speaker 5>some sort of validation that the things that I do

122
00:07:47.560 --> 00:07:49.720
<v Speaker 5>and the things that I come up with actually work

123
00:07:49.879 --> 00:07:53.439
<v Speaker 5>and are interesting and are valuable to other people other

124
00:07:53.519 --> 00:07:58.120
<v Speaker 5>than just me. So it is kind of both cool.

125
00:07:58.279 --> 00:08:01.959
<v Speaker 1>So in a sense, it's like the value that you

126
00:08:02.120 --> 00:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>derive from doing those open source projects in a sense

127
00:08:05.120 --> 00:08:12.439
<v Speaker 1>that you like to share. Basically, yes, cool, how about you, earliad?

128
00:08:13.120 --> 00:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>What's in it for you?

129
00:08:15.800 --> 00:08:19.279
<v Speaker 4>So? I actually really like that this is the first question,

130
00:08:19.319 --> 00:08:24.279
<v Speaker 4>because that's, like, I think, the hardest one. But I

131
00:08:24.279 --> 00:08:28.000
<v Speaker 4>I used to I really like giving talks, not just

132
00:08:28.040 --> 00:08:33.200
<v Speaker 4>on tech, even since I was in high school. Like

133
00:08:33.279 --> 00:08:36.519
<v Speaker 4>I'm standing in front of an audience and speaking about

134
00:08:36.519 --> 00:08:38.559
<v Speaker 4>something that's also something that I did in the in

135
00:08:38.600 --> 00:08:42.639
<v Speaker 4>the military a little bit. And I think that I

136
00:08:42.799 --> 00:08:47.960
<v Speaker 4>noticed that I really enjoy seeing this aha moment in

137
00:08:48.000 --> 00:08:50.919
<v Speaker 4>the eyes of the audience when I try to tell

138
00:08:50.960 --> 00:08:54.799
<v Speaker 4>them about things that that are new to them or

139
00:08:54.840 --> 00:08:57.559
<v Speaker 4>things that I did that all of a sudden they

140
00:08:57.600 --> 00:09:00.519
<v Speaker 4>look at it in a different way, and that that

141
00:09:00.519 --> 00:09:03.080
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't the exact moments that I'm looking for, whether

142
00:09:03.120 --> 00:09:06.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm speaking in a room of fifty people or two

143
00:09:06.720 --> 00:09:09.879
<v Speaker 4>thousand people. So I think that's like the high that

144
00:09:09.919 --> 00:09:12.679
<v Speaker 4>I'm getting from standing standing.

145
00:09:12.360 --> 00:09:15.639
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, it is a rush, I agree.

146
00:09:16.279 --> 00:09:19.159
<v Speaker 4>And so so that's that's one thing that's what's in

147
00:09:19.240 --> 00:09:23.320
<v Speaker 4>it for me. And I think I used to refrain

148
00:09:23.399 --> 00:09:26.480
<v Speaker 4>from even submitting to conferences for a long time. And

149
00:09:26.519 --> 00:09:29.720
<v Speaker 4>then I heard this kind of someone like saying that

150
00:09:30.240 --> 00:09:32.559
<v Speaker 4>someone told me because I thought I had nothing interesting

151
00:09:32.720 --> 00:09:35.759
<v Speaker 4>to say because everybody knows everything. But then someone told me,

152
00:09:36.360 --> 00:09:39.039
<v Speaker 4>I can bet that you did in the past year,

153
00:09:39.440 --> 00:09:43.080
<v Speaker 4>you did at least five things that no one else did,

154
00:09:43.240 --> 00:09:45.080
<v Speaker 4>like no one that you can you can talk about

155
00:09:45.120 --> 00:09:45.720
<v Speaker 4>no one else did.

156
00:09:46.120 --> 00:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>You're jumping the gun on a future question of mine.

157
00:09:49.080 --> 00:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's put that aside for a minute. I mostly

158
00:09:52.159 --> 00:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>want to, So I want to concentrate less on what

159
00:09:55.159 --> 00:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it is that you decide to talk about or the

160
00:09:57.399 --> 00:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>topics you bring to the table. I'm again more focusing

161
00:10:01.639 --> 00:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in this question on the value that we derive from

162
00:10:07.320 --> 00:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>public speaking.

163
00:10:09.559 --> 00:10:12.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I'll just I'll end up by saying that

164
00:10:12.320 --> 00:10:16.600
<v Speaker 4>obviously there's the value of putting myself out there and

165
00:10:16.639 --> 00:10:21.639
<v Speaker 4>making myself a little bit of content. It's not content expert,

166
00:10:21.720 --> 00:10:25.879
<v Speaker 4>but someone who speaks about react to speaks about those

167
00:10:25.960 --> 00:10:29.120
<v Speaker 4>kinds of things, And like Kevital said, when you build,

168
00:10:29.399 --> 00:10:31.639
<v Speaker 4>when you build a talk, you have to really dive

169
00:10:31.919 --> 00:10:34.960
<v Speaker 4>into things, right to explain to explain it to someone

170
00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:38.919
<v Speaker 4>in thirty minutes, you have to know it very deeply.

171
00:10:39.000 --> 00:10:42.240
<v Speaker 4>So that's part of the value that I derive from it,

172
00:10:42.320 --> 00:10:47.720
<v Speaker 4>of understanding the topic really well and also being being

173
00:10:47.759 --> 00:10:50.120
<v Speaker 4>the person that understands the topic really well so they

174
00:10:50.159 --> 00:10:51.720
<v Speaker 4>can talk about it.

175
00:10:52.399 --> 00:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I totally agree with you. I can get the

176
00:10:56.240 --> 00:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>same value from talks also from this podcast. By the way,

177
00:11:00.120 --> 00:11:04.519
<v Speaker 1>that when you need to speak intelligently about the topic,

178
00:11:04.600 --> 00:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it requires you to learn it, to understand it, to

179
00:11:07.840 --> 00:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>actually be able to articulate it means that you have

180
00:11:12.200 --> 00:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to internalize at first, so it's a great way of

181
00:11:14.960 --> 00:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>learning new topics. But you also brought up a certain

182
00:11:18.200 --> 00:11:21.799
<v Speaker 1>point in the past. We actually had this great episode

183
00:11:21.799 --> 00:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>on the show with the Moad Stone from Wicks about

184
00:11:25.279 --> 00:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>building your personal technological brand, and you mentioned that. But

185
00:11:30.639 --> 00:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I do have to ask about this. Do you feel

186
00:11:34.399 --> 00:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that your public speaking has actually promoted your brand in

187
00:11:39.159 --> 00:11:41.279
<v Speaker 1>a sense which furthered your career?

188
00:11:41.399 --> 00:11:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Let's say, yeah, I can answer for myself. Definitely. Definitely.

189
00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:50.600
<v Speaker 4>I feel like my career. You can slit the career

190
00:11:50.639 --> 00:11:53.919
<v Speaker 4>into two. Before I started public speaking and after. You

191
00:11:54.000 --> 00:11:56.559
<v Speaker 4>can't compete with this kind of freach. You can't compete

192
00:11:56.559 --> 00:11:59.799
<v Speaker 4>with an audience of people who sit and listen to you,

193
00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>and you have you have the chance, You have the

194
00:12:01.399 --> 00:12:06.600
<v Speaker 4>opportunity two to present yourself as as an an expert,

195
00:12:06.600 --> 00:12:09.559
<v Speaker 4>as a domain experts, as someone who can speak intelligently

196
00:12:09.639 --> 00:12:12.440
<v Speaker 4>like you say so, Definitely, it has a huge impact

197
00:12:12.519 --> 00:12:15.399
<v Speaker 4>on the brand I think. I think it's the highest

198
00:12:16.000 --> 00:12:17.799
<v Speaker 4>value for effort that you can you can get.

199
00:12:19.519 --> 00:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You're a very senior role principal engineer the very well

200
00:12:24.000 --> 00:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>known company Shopify. Do you think that your public speaking

201
00:12:30.159 --> 00:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was had a significant impact on your ability to get

202
00:12:35.240 --> 00:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this position.

203
00:12:38.320 --> 00:12:43.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, definitely. I can't count the number of messages that

204
00:12:43.200 --> 00:12:47.039
<v Speaker 4>I got. Hey, I saw your video in this conference,

205
00:12:47.080 --> 00:12:49.360
<v Speaker 4>so I saw you in this conference, or someone from

206
00:12:49.360 --> 00:12:52.720
<v Speaker 4>my company told me about this talk that you gave

207
00:12:54.120 --> 00:12:57.399
<v Speaker 4>and when you like, a lot of messages come with

208
00:12:57.480 --> 00:13:01.559
<v Speaker 4>links to my to YouTube of my top So so

209
00:13:01.600 --> 00:13:04.440
<v Speaker 4>I think I wouldn't say that I wouldn't get to

210
00:13:04.519 --> 00:13:07.559
<v Speaker 4>this point otherwise. But but definitely it helps a lot.

211
00:13:07.639 --> 00:13:09.440
<v Speaker 4>It helps a lot put you out there to get

212
00:13:09.480 --> 00:13:13.840
<v Speaker 4>your name to be known. That's something that yeah, you

213
00:13:13.879 --> 00:13:15.559
<v Speaker 4>can't really do in any other way.

214
00:13:17.360 --> 00:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>How about your real.

215
00:13:19.919 --> 00:13:26.639
<v Speaker 2>I think they saw all of my arguments like that first,

216
00:13:29.320 --> 00:13:30.919
<v Speaker 2>and it was both of you. That's still it.

217
00:13:30.919 --> 00:13:34.159
<v Speaker 3>It's it's absolutely likely I said it's a and also

218
00:13:34.320 --> 00:13:38.360
<v Speaker 3>what Avitel said it for me, the value, like the

219
00:13:38.360 --> 00:13:42.639
<v Speaker 3>crowds benefit and my benefit are strictly equal. Like when

220
00:13:42.919 --> 00:13:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I see people's a harm moment like that that fills me.

221
00:13:46.360 --> 00:13:51.600
<v Speaker 3>So I am dependent on like their experience is my experience.

222
00:13:51.679 --> 00:13:55.000
<v Speaker 3>And and also the rush of seeing like you know,

223
00:13:55.200 --> 00:13:59.559
<v Speaker 3>a thousand people focused completely like only.

224
00:13:59.360 --> 00:14:00.639
<v Speaker 2>On every word that you say.

225
00:14:00.639 --> 00:14:05.919
<v Speaker 3>It's an incredible feeling that's very hard to describe. And

226
00:14:05.960 --> 00:14:09.399
<v Speaker 3>also the amount of opportunities that came out of.

227
00:14:09.320 --> 00:14:11.440
<v Speaker 2>This is unbelievable.

228
00:14:11.759 --> 00:14:17.039
<v Speaker 3>And I will say that I also had I was

229
00:14:17.080 --> 00:14:22.159
<v Speaker 3>interviewed recently about like public speaking and branding, and I

230
00:14:22.200 --> 00:14:27.159
<v Speaker 3>think that specifically when you talk about branding, when people

231
00:14:27.360 --> 00:14:32.320
<v Speaker 3>do public speaking not in the purpose of creating a brand,

232
00:14:32.919 --> 00:14:37.679
<v Speaker 3>but in the purpose of delivering and giving other people value,

233
00:14:38.440 --> 00:14:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the brand kind of builds itself. And it's really easy

234
00:14:42.320 --> 00:14:47.519
<v Speaker 3>to differentiate between speakers that the best speakers are not

235
00:14:47.600 --> 00:14:50.399
<v Speaker 3>in it for the branding. The branding built itself because

236
00:14:50.399 --> 00:14:54.080
<v Speaker 3>they're passionate. And I can see a lot of like

237
00:14:55.679 --> 00:15:02.639
<v Speaker 3>people pushing themselves towards public speaking for the sake of branding,

238
00:15:03.200 --> 00:15:05.919
<v Speaker 3>and it just doesn't create the same content because it's

239
00:15:05.960 --> 00:15:09.559
<v Speaker 3>quite obvious right when you're building. When you're creating content,

240
00:15:10.440 --> 00:15:12.399
<v Speaker 3>are you thinking about your brand or are you thinking

241
00:15:12.399 --> 00:15:15.240
<v Speaker 3>about how does my crowd benefit from this to the maximum?

242
00:15:15.360 --> 00:15:18.759
<v Speaker 2>And it really creates a completely different experience if you

243
00:15:18.759 --> 00:15:19.159
<v Speaker 2>ask me.

244
00:15:20.399 --> 00:15:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I do want to add one point. If you tell

245
00:15:23.320 --> 00:15:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you kind of joked about the travel and accommodation, but

246
00:15:27.120 --> 00:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's actually not so much of a joke.

247
00:15:30.720 --> 00:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Almost every time I go to a conference overseas, I

248
00:15:35.120 --> 00:15:38.799
<v Speaker 1>try to turn it into a trip, a vacation, a tour.

249
00:15:39.320 --> 00:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So for example, about two years ago, I spoke at

250
00:15:43.159 --> 00:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the Web Directions in Sydney, Australia, and I brought my

251
00:15:47.559 --> 00:15:51.639
<v Speaker 1>wife along and we toured four months in Australia after

252
00:15:51.679 --> 00:15:54.799
<v Speaker 1>this conference. Now, obviously we don't need the conference in

253
00:15:54.879 --> 00:15:58.759
<v Speaker 1>order to do that, but it's really nice when somebody

254
00:15:58.879 --> 00:16:04.919
<v Speaker 1>pays for half your plane tickets. Uh And and that's

255
00:16:04.960 --> 00:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a fairly significant factor for me of basically just visiting

256
00:16:09.519 --> 00:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>places that I might not have gone to otherwise. If

257
00:16:14.799 --> 00:16:17.279
<v Speaker 1>not for that, for those conferences.

258
00:16:17.519 --> 00:16:21.080
<v Speaker 3>You if you weren't that passionate about JavaScript, I don't

259
00:16:21.080 --> 00:16:21.879
<v Speaker 3>know if you would have made it.

260
00:16:22.039 --> 00:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, for sure. But you know it's like you

261
00:16:24.759 --> 00:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>know they say about real programmers that you know, we're

262
00:16:30.000 --> 00:16:33.039
<v Speaker 1>always surprised at how much we earned doing something we

263
00:16:33.080 --> 00:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>would have done for free. And I guess it's kind

264
00:16:36.639 --> 00:16:40.279
<v Speaker 1>of the same about the conferences, the conference scene. I

265
00:16:40.559 --> 00:16:44.519
<v Speaker 1>I probably would have done it otherwise, but it's a

266
00:16:44.559 --> 00:16:49.399
<v Speaker 1>great benefit. I will say, just and I'll give you

267
00:16:49.440 --> 00:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the the I'll let you speak in a second yad.

268
00:16:52.480 --> 00:16:55.799
<v Speaker 1>I will say that if a conference does not cover

269
00:16:55.919 --> 00:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>my expenses and it's not a conference that my job

270
00:17:00.519 --> 00:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>decides to send me to, then I'm highly unlikely to

271
00:17:04.200 --> 00:17:04.839
<v Speaker 1>go there.

272
00:17:07.279 --> 00:17:10.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so you spoke about the accommodation and the flight,

273
00:17:10.319 --> 00:17:13.640
<v Speaker 4>and that's actually that raises another point. Another benefit of

274
00:17:14.160 --> 00:17:18.440
<v Speaker 4>speaking conferences, especially high profile conferences, is the other speakers.

275
00:17:18.839 --> 00:17:22.000
<v Speaker 4>So you have a lot of opportunities to connect with

276
00:17:22.319 --> 00:17:25.680
<v Speaker 4>people that are legends in the field, and you sit

277
00:17:25.759 --> 00:17:28.160
<v Speaker 4>with them to speakers dinner, and you talk to them

278
00:17:28.319 --> 00:17:33.079
<v Speaker 4>and you create connections, and that's something that it's a

279
00:17:33.079 --> 00:17:35.480
<v Speaker 4>personal benefit. It's not why you do the conferences, but

280
00:17:36.279 --> 00:17:39.759
<v Speaker 4>that's something that helps build your brand and build your connections,

281
00:17:39.839 --> 00:17:43.880
<v Speaker 4>and coming as a speaker obviously put you in a

282
00:17:43.880 --> 00:17:46.000
<v Speaker 4>different category than just coming to the conference.

283
00:17:46.519 --> 00:17:50.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually a host here on this podcast because of that,

284
00:17:50.319 --> 00:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>because I was speaking at O'Reilly Fluent when that process,

285
00:17:55.440 --> 00:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>when that conference still existed a few years ago, and

286
00:17:59.559 --> 00:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the state it's like six years ago, it's not so

287
00:18:02.240 --> 00:18:05.519
<v Speaker 1>few anymore, six or seven. And I met Amy Knight,

288
00:18:05.599 --> 00:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>who was one of the hosts at JavaScript Jabber back then,

289
00:18:10.400 --> 00:18:13.039
<v Speaker 1>and she basically kind of invited me on the show

290
00:18:13.119 --> 00:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and things got rolling and eventually I became a host.

291
00:18:17.119 --> 00:18:21.599
<v Speaker 1>So for sure. I met ken C. Dodds, I met

292
00:18:21.759 --> 00:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Simpson, I made the tagus. The list goes on

293
00:18:26.720 --> 00:18:29.759
<v Speaker 1>and on, you know, some just some people off the

294
00:18:29.799 --> 00:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>top of my head. But the speakers dinners tend to

295
00:18:35.720 --> 00:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. And also I like to say that probably

296
00:18:39.480 --> 00:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that in many conferences the most interesting place in the

297
00:18:43.039 --> 00:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>conference is the speaker's room.

298
00:18:44.839 --> 00:18:46.519
<v Speaker 4>Speakers room. Yeah.

299
00:18:47.359 --> 00:18:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if even if you're not speaking, I recommend sneaking

300
00:18:50.319 --> 00:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>into the speaker's room. Yeah. There usually isn't a guard

301
00:18:55.519 --> 00:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>at the door. You can basically just get in if

302
00:18:57.680 --> 00:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got the.

303
00:18:59.480 --> 00:19:00.519
<v Speaker 5>Don't tell the secret.

304
00:19:00.599 --> 00:19:04.599
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, but by the way, about personal branda that

305
00:19:04.680 --> 00:19:06.880
<v Speaker 4>you ask, I remember that. I think only after my

306
00:19:07.000 --> 00:19:10.599
<v Speaker 4>third or fourth talk ever, I think it was Guilty

307
00:19:10.640 --> 00:19:13.200
<v Speaker 4>Hear that came to me and say, hey, maybe you

308
00:19:13.279 --> 00:19:16.680
<v Speaker 4>do want to put your details, like your contact details

309
00:19:16.720 --> 00:19:19.359
<v Speaker 4>at the end of the of the talk, just so

310
00:19:19.480 --> 00:19:21.559
<v Speaker 4>people will know you know who you who you are.

311
00:19:21.759 --> 00:19:24.839
<v Speaker 4>And I was so focused on giving the value that

312
00:19:24.920 --> 00:19:27.599
<v Speaker 4>didn't think about it. But that's something that if you

313
00:19:27.680 --> 00:19:30.640
<v Speaker 4>want to use conferences to increase your person brand, you

314
00:19:30.640 --> 00:19:31.400
<v Speaker 4>have to do that, right.

315
00:19:31.680 --> 00:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So Gil I actually met at Wix, but he's

316
00:19:34.400 --> 00:19:36.519
<v Speaker 1>one of the great people you can meet at conferences.

317
00:19:36.599 --> 00:19:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Another one was Rich Harris. I met him at the conference.

318
00:19:40.319 --> 00:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of amazing people, Ryan Carniato. The list goes

319
00:19:44.759 --> 00:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on and on and on. I even remember a funny story,

320
00:19:51.559 --> 00:19:55.279
<v Speaker 1>like way back when I was at Google ioe and

321
00:19:55.359 --> 00:19:58.599
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't even speaking there. I was just, you know,

322
00:19:59.000 --> 00:20:03.039
<v Speaker 1>visiting and walking around, and I met Jason Miller, the

323
00:20:03.079 --> 00:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>creator of pre Act, and I met I forget his name,

324
00:20:07.200 --> 00:20:14.079
<v Speaker 1>the guy who created Webpack Socra I forget anyway, so

325
00:20:14.400 --> 00:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we were sitting together, and then we were walking around together,

326
00:20:17.720 --> 00:20:21.799
<v Speaker 1>just talking about stuff. And then I see this guy

327
00:20:21.880 --> 00:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>walking towards us, and there's this look of recognition in

328
00:20:25.480 --> 00:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>his eyes, and he walks up to us, all excited,

329
00:20:28.359 --> 00:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering who will he speak to, the creator

330
00:20:31.480 --> 00:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of pre Act to my right or the creator of

331
00:20:33.640 --> 00:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>web back to my left. And he goes to me

332
00:20:35.759 --> 00:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and he says, Dan, I saw your talk at this

333
00:20:38.599 --> 00:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and that conference. It was so good, and I was like, yes,

334
00:20:41.839 --> 00:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So it does create a certain brand recognition and it's

335
00:20:45.400 --> 00:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a great feeling when that happens. Anyway, moving on to

336
00:20:48.519 --> 00:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the next question that I prepared. So we talked about

337
00:20:55.839 --> 00:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>our background to speakers about why we got into public speaking.

338
00:21:00.079 --> 00:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But after talking about the why, let's talk about the how.

339
00:21:05.240 --> 00:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>How did you actually get into public speaking? What was

340
00:21:08.440 --> 00:21:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the process for you? Wants to go first? This time,

341
00:21:13.680 --> 00:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>meet this time, go for it.

342
00:21:17.799 --> 00:21:21.279
<v Speaker 3>And as a matter of fact, I was really outside

343
00:21:21.319 --> 00:21:22.000
<v Speaker 3>of the whole.

344
00:21:23.599 --> 00:21:27.359
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say the industry.

345
00:21:26.519 --> 00:21:30.039
<v Speaker 3>But like I wasn't really in this world of conferences,

346
00:21:30.160 --> 00:21:34.599
<v Speaker 3>and I was barely going to twenty meetimes, so I

347
00:21:34.799 --> 00:21:37.799
<v Speaker 3>had no idea how what of a brand it could

348
00:21:37.839 --> 00:21:40.240
<v Speaker 3>create and which opportunities is it going to give me?

349
00:21:40.319 --> 00:21:45.119
<v Speaker 2>Like I just went I changed jobs after I worked

350
00:21:45.119 --> 00:21:46.200
<v Speaker 2>in Licensed.

351
00:21:46.279 --> 00:21:50.079
<v Speaker 3>And in my new job, I suddenly I wasn't in

352
00:21:50.200 --> 00:21:54.359
<v Speaker 3>a team full of senior developers, and I suddenly saw

353
00:21:54.519 --> 00:21:58.640
<v Speaker 3>that I have value to give other developers. You were

354
00:21:58.720 --> 00:22:04.799
<v Speaker 3>the senior, yes, And suddenly I saw that I that

355
00:22:04.880 --> 00:22:07.519
<v Speaker 3>I have a lot of things I can teach others,

356
00:22:07.759 --> 00:22:11.039
<v Speaker 3>and and I wanted more. I wanted more than just

357
00:22:11.160 --> 00:22:16.079
<v Speaker 3>the five developers I was working with. And I was

358
00:22:16.119 --> 00:22:18.839
<v Speaker 3>looking for for a connection to speak in a in

359
00:22:18.880 --> 00:22:22.720
<v Speaker 3>a meetup, and I went to reverse in conference and

360
00:22:23.119 --> 00:22:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I started the mingling and caught some guy that that

361
00:22:27.599 --> 00:22:31.039
<v Speaker 3>connected Gilad you guys know him, and he connected me

362
00:22:31.119 --> 00:22:34.559
<v Speaker 3>with some community to speak in a meetup. It was

363
00:22:34.839 --> 00:22:38.559
<v Speaker 3>I gave a talk about GIT actually how how it works,

364
00:22:38.880 --> 00:22:44.880
<v Speaker 3>and and it just blew up. It was really quite insane,

365
00:22:46.160 --> 00:22:50.079
<v Speaker 3>Like after that talk, I had so many, so many

366
00:22:50.559 --> 00:22:53.599
<v Speaker 3>different industries approaching me. I was, I gave that talk

367
00:22:53.759 --> 00:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>like probably everywhere in the military, and then the conference

368
00:23:00.240 --> 00:23:03.480
<v Speaker 3>approach to me to come to file to file a SFP,

369
00:23:05.359 --> 00:23:09.079
<v Speaker 3>and and it really just got so crazy so fast.

370
00:23:09.119 --> 00:23:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Without any intention of I had no idea what I'm

371
00:23:12.640 --> 00:23:14.039
<v Speaker 3>going to what's in it for me, Like.

372
00:23:14.000 --> 00:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>What we talked about earlier.

373
00:23:15.279 --> 00:23:18.359
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to to teach people stuff.

374
00:23:18.400 --> 00:23:21.480
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, like I can talk about this.

375
00:23:21.720 --> 00:23:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I like, like, I think it's beautiful, and and one

376
00:23:25.880 --> 00:23:28.839
<v Speaker 3>thing led to another, and now I'm flying for four

377
00:23:28.880 --> 00:23:31.000
<v Speaker 3>convinces in the year.

378
00:23:32.039 --> 00:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Each each one have has their own concept of beauty.

379
00:23:36.680 --> 00:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't think it is I think. I think KITS

380
00:23:39.240 --> 00:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is beautiful on the inside. I think the command line

381
00:23:42.440 --> 00:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>interface leaves a lot to be desired if.

382
00:23:45.680 --> 00:23:48.920
<v Speaker 2>You would listen to my talk. I don't recommend that

383
00:23:49.000 --> 00:23:50.160
<v Speaker 2>much using the command line.

384
00:23:50.200 --> 00:23:52.599
<v Speaker 3>I just recommend understanding how it works, and then you

385
00:23:52.640 --> 00:23:55.759
<v Speaker 3>can use the beautiful doing interfaces.

386
00:23:56.880 --> 00:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Point taken. Have you told how about you? How did

387
00:24:01.160 --> 00:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you get into actually public speaking?

388
00:24:04.079 --> 00:24:10.839
<v Speaker 5>Funny story, No, so first one, like I initially wanted

389
00:24:10.880 --> 00:24:15.440
<v Speaker 5>to become a public speaker, like years before. I remember

390
00:24:15.519 --> 00:24:19.920
<v Speaker 5>going to a conference in twenty fifteen, and I think

391
00:24:19.920 --> 00:24:21.880
<v Speaker 5>it was the first you got a left front at

392
00:24:21.920 --> 00:24:25.640
<v Speaker 5>in twenty fifteen, and I saw I think it was

393
00:24:25.720 --> 00:24:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Douglas Crawford and on the stage and and and I

394
00:24:29.480 --> 00:24:33.119
<v Speaker 5>was odd because for the first time that I go

395
00:24:33.160 --> 00:24:35.319
<v Speaker 5>to a conference, I see it wasn't about him, but

396
00:24:35.400 --> 00:24:38.960
<v Speaker 5>it was about him being actually being valued enough to

397
00:24:39.039 --> 00:24:42.400
<v Speaker 5>be flown all the way to another country and actually

398
00:24:42.480 --> 00:24:46.720
<v Speaker 5>delivering value to an audience. And already at that point,

399
00:24:46.799 --> 00:24:48.400
<v Speaker 5>I was like, I want to be there. I want

400
00:24:48.400 --> 00:24:51.680
<v Speaker 5>to be on that stage, be able to deliver value

401
00:24:51.920 --> 00:24:57.119
<v Speaker 5>and valued enough so that I can be sent or

402
00:24:57.160 --> 00:24:59.799
<v Speaker 5>invited to such conferences. And I had no idea what

403
00:24:59.880 --> 00:25:02.599
<v Speaker 5>that that means being invited to a conference. And in

404
00:25:02.680 --> 00:25:06.759
<v Speaker 5>twenty nineteen came my first option, or my first opportunity,

405
00:25:06.839 --> 00:25:12.440
<v Speaker 5>where my company pretty much promoted and advocated for engineers

406
00:25:12.480 --> 00:25:17.079
<v Speaker 5>to apply for the Reversing conference, which was a local conference,

407
00:25:17.400 --> 00:25:19.799
<v Speaker 5>so it was pretty easy. The process was pretty easy

408
00:25:20.200 --> 00:25:23.480
<v Speaker 5>to follow up, and there was a voting process, and

409
00:25:24.119 --> 00:25:26.680
<v Speaker 5>I got in and gave a lightning talk, a fifteen

410
00:25:26.680 --> 00:25:30.279
<v Speaker 5>minute lightning talk about one of my open source projects.

411
00:25:31.039 --> 00:25:34.400
<v Speaker 5>But then a year after COVID hit and I was like,

412
00:25:34.519 --> 00:25:37.119
<v Speaker 5>how do I go to conferences? And now how do

413
00:25:37.160 --> 00:25:38.160
<v Speaker 5>I join conferences?

414
00:25:38.160 --> 00:25:38.319
<v Speaker 3>Now?

415
00:25:38.319 --> 00:25:40.440
<v Speaker 5>How do I apply? I didn't even work at the

416
00:25:40.440 --> 00:25:43.519
<v Speaker 5>same place, nobody advocated for it, and I didn't really

417
00:25:43.599 --> 00:25:48.039
<v Speaker 5>still know any any speakers or anybody. And I didn't

418
00:25:48.079 --> 00:25:50.279
<v Speaker 5>know which door should I knock? What is the secret

419
00:25:50.319 --> 00:25:53.319
<v Speaker 5>code for actually applying to conferences? How do I get invited?

420
00:25:53.920 --> 00:25:59.400
<v Speaker 5>And it was like a very weird process of trial

421
00:25:59.440 --> 00:26:03.119
<v Speaker 5>and error and actually understanding there's no secret code, there

422
00:26:03.160 --> 00:26:07.799
<v Speaker 5>is no speakeasy bar. It's just a simple cfp kofa

423
00:26:07.880 --> 00:26:10.400
<v Speaker 5>papers form that you need to file and come up

424
00:26:10.400 --> 00:26:13.759
<v Speaker 5>with an interesting enough idea. And I filed enough of

425
00:26:13.839 --> 00:26:16.680
<v Speaker 5>those that I started getting accepted to back. It was

426
00:26:16.759 --> 00:26:20.680
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty, so online conferences because everything was online in

427
00:26:20.720 --> 00:26:25.680
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty, and suddenly that opened the door to real

428
00:26:25.720 --> 00:26:28.519
<v Speaker 5>life conferences, first in Poland and then in Germany, and

429
00:26:28.559 --> 00:26:31.039
<v Speaker 5>another one in Germany, and like a bunch of those

430
00:26:31.400 --> 00:26:33.000
<v Speaker 5>worldwide years after.

431
00:26:34.480 --> 00:26:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the COVID period was tough. Oh yeah, sure.

432
00:26:41.839 --> 00:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Why wasn't it tough for you?

433
00:26:44.039 --> 00:26:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I was surfing in Australia.

434
00:26:46.000 --> 00:26:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, okay, that's that's yeah. I can dig it. Yeah,

435
00:26:51.640 --> 00:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I can dig it. I can envy you. That's fine. Yeah,

436
00:26:56.960 --> 00:27:01.319
<v Speaker 1>it's It's interesting because my reaction to COVID was actually

437
00:27:01.599 --> 00:27:03.799
<v Speaker 1>a bit of the opposite of yours. I've been speaking

438
00:27:03.839 --> 00:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>for a while before COVID, and when COVID hit, initially,

439
00:27:07.759 --> 00:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I also registered for a couple of online conferences just

440
00:27:11.359 --> 00:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep the ball rolling. The assumption was, you know,

441
00:27:13.480 --> 00:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably get out of this mess in about six

442
00:27:15.680 --> 00:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>months or so. So I did a couple of those,

443
00:27:19.079 --> 00:27:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and my overall experience with them was terrible, felt like

444
00:27:22.680 --> 00:27:28.839
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to a wall, and I basically just

445
00:27:28.920 --> 00:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>gave up on those. So for the most of the

446
00:27:31.559 --> 00:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>duration of COVID, I did not speak at conferences at all,

447
00:27:34.960 --> 00:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and only got back to it after COVID hit. After

448
00:27:38.079 --> 00:27:41.519
<v Speaker 1>COVID ended, and then the war happened, and you know,

449
00:27:42.000 --> 00:27:46.599
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years have not been easy anyway, I.

450
00:27:46.519 --> 00:27:49.000
<v Speaker 5>Completely agree, But I saw that as a ladder for

451
00:27:49.079 --> 00:27:51.440
<v Speaker 5>me because that was the beginning of my career as

452
00:27:51.440 --> 00:27:56.960
<v Speaker 5>a speaker today. I completely agree with your with your

453
00:27:56.960 --> 00:28:00.720
<v Speaker 5>perception of online conferences. Many people like them, maybe as

454
00:28:00.759 --> 00:28:04.119
<v Speaker 5>an audience. As a speaker, you don't get audience engagement

455
00:28:04.839 --> 00:28:06.960
<v Speaker 5>and you don't even know if you come through to

456
00:28:07.000 --> 00:28:07.599
<v Speaker 5>the audience.

457
00:28:09.200 --> 00:28:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. How about Julia, how did you get

458
00:28:12.559 --> 00:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>into the game.

459
00:28:14.200 --> 00:28:18.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So I have been giving internal talks in DUDA

460
00:28:18.400 --> 00:28:20.759
<v Speaker 4>because I was leading the front, and so I did

461
00:28:20.799 --> 00:28:24.319
<v Speaker 4>a lot of small talks like Ariel in Duda, and

462
00:28:24.759 --> 00:28:27.920
<v Speaker 4>there was I think it was early twenty nineteen, like

463
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:31.079
<v Speaker 4>January twenty nineteen, where they came to me and say

464
00:28:31.119 --> 00:28:32.359
<v Speaker 4>do they come to me and say, hey, we're going

465
00:28:32.400 --> 00:28:34.920
<v Speaker 4>to host a meetup of a group called the React

466
00:28:34.960 --> 00:28:37.359
<v Speaker 4>as well. Do you want to give a talk there

467
00:28:37.400 --> 00:28:40.119
<v Speaker 4>about like the React migration that we did. And I

468
00:28:40.119 --> 00:28:43.599
<v Speaker 4>said okay, and I took I think a whole week.

469
00:28:43.799 --> 00:28:46.799
<v Speaker 4>I built this talk like a whole week, full time,

470
00:28:47.799 --> 00:28:49.720
<v Speaker 4>went into tuning because it was my first talk in

471
00:28:49.759 --> 00:28:52.519
<v Speaker 4>the meetup, and I gave it and it got really

472
00:28:52.599 --> 00:28:55.839
<v Speaker 4>good results. And actually my experience was the opposite of

473
00:28:56.000 --> 00:28:59.279
<v Speaker 4>guitars By. I didn't submit anything, but right after the

474
00:28:59.319 --> 00:29:02.799
<v Speaker 4>meetup Adam Klein, from one of the organizers of React Next.

475
00:29:02.880 --> 00:29:05.039
<v Speaker 4>It took me aside and say, hey, do you want

476
00:29:05.039 --> 00:29:07.359
<v Speaker 4>to speak at the React next. I mean, do you

477
00:29:07.359 --> 00:29:10.079
<v Speaker 4>want to give some sort of a talkic React Next? Yeah,

478
00:29:10.119 --> 00:29:13.640
<v Speaker 4>of course, And then I gave a talk at at

479
00:29:13.720 --> 00:29:15.599
<v Speaker 4>React Next. It was in whole By, which is a

480
00:29:15.640 --> 00:29:18.720
<v Speaker 4>smaller one, and I prepared for it a lot, so

481
00:29:18.839 --> 00:29:21.720
<v Speaker 4>I was a little bit disappointed, but it was crowded,

482
00:29:21.720 --> 00:29:25.599
<v Speaker 4>it was full, full, full room, and it also got

483
00:29:25.599 --> 00:29:27.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it got like the best talk in the

484
00:29:27.480 --> 00:29:29.519
<v Speaker 4>conference or something like that, and that really opened the

485
00:29:29.599 --> 00:29:37.640
<v Speaker 4>door for conference in Israel and as for the conferences abroad.

486
00:29:38.000 --> 00:29:40.759
<v Speaker 4>So actually the COVID times were really helpful for me,

487
00:29:40.920 --> 00:29:44.319
<v Speaker 4>like if you tas said, because it was online conferences,

488
00:29:44.920 --> 00:29:46.960
<v Speaker 4>and because it was online, there were a lot of tracks,

489
00:29:46.960 --> 00:29:50.279
<v Speaker 4>so a lot of talks could be accepted, so it

490
00:29:50.400 --> 00:29:54.200
<v Speaker 4>was really easy to start building your name and reputation

491
00:29:54.960 --> 00:29:58.599
<v Speaker 4>in those online conferences. I gave I think six or

492
00:29:58.680 --> 00:30:02.519
<v Speaker 4>seven different during the half year of the COVID day.

493
00:30:02.599 --> 00:30:04.920
<v Speaker 4>I recorded one of them from Greece. So we were

494
00:30:04.920 --> 00:30:07.240
<v Speaker 4>in a house in Greece and I sat with the

495
00:30:07.279 --> 00:30:09.200
<v Speaker 4>laptop and I recorded them because I had to submit

496
00:30:09.240 --> 00:30:13.759
<v Speaker 4>them and afterwards afterwards it opened the door to like

497
00:30:14.160 --> 00:30:18.680
<v Speaker 4>international conferences. I spoke in REACT Summit and GEST Nation,

498
00:30:18.880 --> 00:30:23.839
<v Speaker 4>all the all the big conferences, which yeah, and the

499
00:30:24.160 --> 00:30:26.400
<v Speaker 4>rest is history. By the way, I have to say

500
00:30:26.400 --> 00:30:29.480
<v Speaker 4>that before before I started speaking conferences, I went to

501
00:30:29.519 --> 00:30:32.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot of conferences like Avatar. I went to YGLF

502
00:30:32.079 --> 00:30:33.720
<v Speaker 4>You Got a Left Front in twenty fifteen. I think

503
00:30:33.759 --> 00:30:35.920
<v Speaker 4>it was like the infliction for a lot of us.

504
00:30:36.240 --> 00:30:39.240
<v Speaker 4>And the talk that that affected me the most, there

505
00:30:39.279 --> 00:30:41.359
<v Speaker 4>were two of them. The first one was Gilt I

506
00:30:41.400 --> 00:30:44.279
<v Speaker 4>hours so I looked at Guilt Talk and it was

507
00:30:44.519 --> 00:30:47.039
<v Speaker 4>so out of this world and as I want to be.

508
00:30:47.160 --> 00:30:48.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how, but I want to be there

509
00:30:48.920 --> 00:30:52.599
<v Speaker 4>on the stage one day. And the second, the second

510
00:30:52.640 --> 00:30:56.000
<v Speaker 4>one was the closing talk from I don't remember his name,

511
00:30:56.160 --> 00:30:59.559
<v Speaker 4>some from Smashing magazine who gave a talk that was

512
00:31:00.079 --> 00:31:04.519
<v Speaker 4>thirty minutes something like nine hundred slides like and it

513
00:31:04.640 --> 00:31:08.720
<v Speaker 4>was such a such a rush running through the stock.

514
00:31:09.400 --> 00:31:11.359
<v Speaker 4>I really enjoyed it, even though I didn't understand like

515
00:31:11.400 --> 00:31:14.079
<v Speaker 4>half of the things. So I said, okay, I want

516
00:31:14.079 --> 00:31:17.000
<v Speaker 4>to be the kind of people, this kind of person

517
00:31:17.039 --> 00:31:17.799
<v Speaker 4>that stands on and.

518
00:31:18.079 --> 00:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You mean Vitally Itally.

519
00:31:19.720 --> 00:31:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Friedman, Yeah, I think I think it was Itally.

520
00:31:21.880 --> 00:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's another guy I met at a couple of conferences.

521
00:31:24.640 --> 00:31:26.359
<v Speaker 1>He is a great guy. We should probably have him

522
00:31:26.400 --> 00:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on the show some.

523
00:31:27.079 --> 00:31:29.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's a great entertainer. I mean that Gill and

524
00:31:29.720 --> 00:31:33.119
<v Speaker 4>Vitally was the like my epitom of how how a

525
00:31:33.160 --> 00:31:35.880
<v Speaker 4>good speaker should be. It should be informative and entertained.

526
00:31:36.240 --> 00:31:40.519
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, So just to give my own background story,

527
00:31:40.599 --> 00:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I was working at this small company, a startup, and

528
00:31:44.079 --> 00:31:46.559
<v Speaker 1>we were playing in the field with a lot of

529
00:31:46.640 --> 00:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>larger companies. We were trying to get the message out

530
00:31:50.279 --> 00:31:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and I actually leveraged conferences initially basically is a means

531
00:31:54.359 --> 00:31:57.839
<v Speaker 1>to promote our company and our technology. So it was

532
00:31:57.920 --> 00:32:01.079
<v Speaker 1>not a sponsored I was. I was not. I was

533
00:32:01.119 --> 00:32:04.799
<v Speaker 1>really careful not to do it like to marketing. So

534
00:32:04.880 --> 00:32:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about technologies and stuff like that, but

535
00:32:08.440 --> 00:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I was still getting just the fact that I could say,

536
00:32:12.240 --> 00:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're using this technology, or I could use our

537
00:32:16.440 --> 00:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>products as examples for useful stuff, and enabled me to

538
00:32:20.880 --> 00:32:22.839
<v Speaker 1>get the word out. And then I got and I

539
00:32:22.960 --> 00:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and then I started working at WIS. And one of

540
00:32:26.000 --> 00:32:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the great things about WIS is that WIS really pushes

541
00:32:30.759 --> 00:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>its employees to speak at conferences and even covers expenses

542
00:32:34.960 --> 00:32:38.559
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. And I also got into a

543
00:32:38.599 --> 00:32:43.079
<v Speaker 1>web performance relatively early, and that became a really hot topic.

544
00:32:43.200 --> 00:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So for a while there it was fairly straightforward to

545
00:32:46.880 --> 00:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>get into conferences speaking about web performance. Anyway, moving on

546
00:32:52.640 --> 00:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to the next question, how do you find and select

547
00:32:59.519 --> 00:33:04.119
<v Speaker 1>speaking opportunities? What are your selection criteria for deciding which

548
00:33:04.160 --> 00:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>conferences to try to speak at? Oh?

549
00:33:06.799 --> 00:33:10.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, go first again. Yeah, I'm thinking do I want

550
00:33:10.759 --> 00:33:12.440
<v Speaker 5>to get more competition or not?

551
00:33:12.960 --> 00:33:16.559
<v Speaker 1>You don't want you know, you don't need to name

552
00:33:16.599 --> 00:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the conferences if no, no, no, it's fine.

553
00:33:19.440 --> 00:33:23.400
<v Speaker 5>It's fine. I was just kidding. There are enough conferences

554
00:33:23.480 --> 00:33:27.400
<v Speaker 5>in enough areas that it's okay, and and we always

555
00:33:27.839 --> 00:33:30.720
<v Speaker 5>in all conferences, I think, welcoming speakers as well, so

556
00:33:31.119 --> 00:33:34.240
<v Speaker 5>it's completely fine. So first of all, there are many

557
00:33:34.319 --> 00:33:40.839
<v Speaker 5>online repositories for for conferences, so like a bunch of websites,

558
00:33:40.880 --> 00:33:43.680
<v Speaker 5>there is a trailer board and airtable board. I just

559
00:33:44.160 --> 00:33:47.799
<v Speaker 5>found a new one recently that just have the list

560
00:33:48.039 --> 00:33:54.119
<v Speaker 5>of all upcoming, all upcoming conferences, and they usually also

561
00:33:54.240 --> 00:33:57.720
<v Speaker 5>say if the conferences cover travel and accommodation.

562
00:33:57.680 --> 00:33:59.559
<v Speaker 4>What it is about? What is the date?

563
00:34:00.160 --> 00:34:05.559
<v Speaker 5>So these are very good utilities and tools and websites.

564
00:34:05.680 --> 00:34:09.679
<v Speaker 5>Usually you should just look up on Google CFP and

565
00:34:10.159 --> 00:34:12.960
<v Speaker 5>maybe we can later on on the show notes just

566
00:34:13.039 --> 00:34:18.280
<v Speaker 5>a bunch of them. So yeah, yeah, so that we

567
00:34:18.320 --> 00:34:21.719
<v Speaker 5>can so that the audience can find them. But also

568
00:34:22.199 --> 00:34:23.039
<v Speaker 5>there is think.

569
00:34:23.400 --> 00:34:25.199
<v Speaker 1>By the way, before you go on, what do you

570
00:34:25.199 --> 00:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>think of sessionized sessionize?

571
00:34:28.880 --> 00:34:32.199
<v Speaker 5>It's it's a good tool for actually applying, but I

572
00:34:32.239 --> 00:34:35.719
<v Speaker 5>don't think it's a good discovery tool from conferences. I

573
00:34:35.719 --> 00:34:37.679
<v Speaker 5>I do not enjoy it for discoverability.

574
00:34:38.440 --> 00:34:41.679
<v Speaker 1>MM. Probably need to get you to share some of

575
00:34:41.719 --> 00:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>your links with me.

576
00:34:43.679 --> 00:34:46.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, that's gonna be on the show notes, I think,

577
00:34:47.039 --> 00:34:51.159
<v Speaker 5>but before that they'll get to you. And also there

578
00:34:51.199 --> 00:34:56.280
<v Speaker 5>is a really cool initiative in the Israeli community. That's

579
00:34:56.519 --> 00:34:58.639
<v Speaker 5>What's up group for. I don't know how many we

580
00:34:58.679 --> 00:35:02.280
<v Speaker 5>are there already, but at least do at least dozens

581
00:35:02.280 --> 00:35:06.440
<v Speaker 5>of speakers from Israel that we actually share cfps that

582
00:35:06.679 --> 00:35:09.880
<v Speaker 5>are about to close soon. And there's even a website

583
00:35:09.880 --> 00:35:14.840
<v Speaker 5>for that community where we voluntarily upload a list of

584
00:35:15.000 --> 00:35:21.559
<v Speaker 5>cfps that we find. So that's pretty cool for sure.

585
00:35:21.800 --> 00:35:23.639
<v Speaker 5>Members of it yeah.

586
00:35:23.760 --> 00:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's how I recruited you for this conversation. Yeah,

587
00:35:28.599 --> 00:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>how about you. Yeah.

588
00:35:30.400 --> 00:35:34.440
<v Speaker 4>So, in addition to those resucess that Evita mentioned, I

589
00:35:34.480 --> 00:35:38.159
<v Speaker 4>think at some point in your career and your speaking career,

590
00:35:38.480 --> 00:35:41.719
<v Speaker 4>where you have conferences that you either gave more than

591
00:35:41.760 --> 00:35:44.159
<v Speaker 4>one talking or you gave a really good talking, you

592
00:35:44.360 --> 00:35:49.880
<v Speaker 4>start to get inbound requests for full speaking. For example

593
00:35:49.920 --> 00:35:53.760
<v Speaker 4>that get nation conferences sometimes approached me and say, hey,

594
00:35:53.800 --> 00:35:55.519
<v Speaker 4>we have reactions on it next year, do you want

595
00:35:55.559 --> 00:35:58.760
<v Speaker 4>to speak? Or the Giggle, which is like a network

596
00:35:58.800 --> 00:36:03.400
<v Speaker 4>of a lot of online conferences. They usually they have

597
00:36:03.440 --> 00:36:08.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of inbound requests. And so so in addition

598
00:36:08.440 --> 00:36:11.480
<v Speaker 4>to those kind of conferences, I know people in the

599
00:36:11.519 --> 00:36:14.760
<v Speaker 4>community that share with me, Hey we're going to speak,

600
00:36:14.960 --> 00:36:18.039
<v Speaker 4>or we're applying to decent this conference, or there's this

601
00:36:18.360 --> 00:36:21.840
<v Speaker 4>really interesting conference that that's happening. So I think like

602
00:36:22.320 --> 00:36:25.719
<v Speaker 4>building a network of speakers, that's also something that's really

603
00:36:26.199 --> 00:36:27.480
<v Speaker 4>really important.

604
00:36:27.159 --> 00:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>In order to building networks is always a good thing. Yeah,

605
00:36:31.960 --> 00:36:34.199
<v Speaker 1>are you? And anything to add.

606
00:36:35.880 --> 00:36:41.239
<v Speaker 3>Take a viotar's links, I think I think I got

607
00:36:41.280 --> 00:36:44.280
<v Speaker 3>like maybe four conferences since I asked the votar for

608
00:36:44.400 --> 00:36:46.079
<v Speaker 3>his resources.

609
00:36:46.400 --> 00:36:48.159
<v Speaker 5>Oh I got the best links.

610
00:36:49.559 --> 00:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Links for us. But that's what you guys described is

611
00:36:54.440 --> 00:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>how you find conferences. But how do you choose conferences?

612
00:36:58.920 --> 00:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I assume you don't submit to each and

613
00:37:01.800 --> 00:37:05.639
<v Speaker 1>every conference. How do you choose which conferences to submit too?

614
00:37:07.159 --> 00:37:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Why not submit and then refuse like you can?

615
00:37:11.960 --> 00:37:14.280
<v Speaker 3>You can submit as many as you like, you can

616
00:37:14.360 --> 00:37:20.000
<v Speaker 3>refuse like, oh, yeah, honestly, I don't. I would submit

617
00:37:20.159 --> 00:37:26.639
<v Speaker 3>to anything that has travel and accommodations covered and it's

618
00:37:26.679 --> 00:37:28.880
<v Speaker 3>not a place that I wouldn't like to be at.

619
00:37:29.599 --> 00:37:33.519
<v Speaker 3>And I it happened to me to decline to conferences, Like,

620
00:37:33.719 --> 00:37:35.880
<v Speaker 3>it's fine, it happens. I think it's better to have

621
00:37:36.280 --> 00:37:38.599
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity to decline than.

622
00:37:38.639 --> 00:37:39.599
<v Speaker 2>Not to have it at all.

623
00:37:40.360 --> 00:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, obviously you occasionally need to decline, you know, sometimes

624
00:37:44.480 --> 00:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>strictly for personal reasons. Sometimes because you submit for three

625
00:37:48.400 --> 00:37:51.039
<v Speaker 1>conferences and they all happen at more or less the

626
00:37:51.079 --> 00:37:54.159
<v Speaker 1>same date, so you can't physically be three and you

627
00:37:54.199 --> 00:37:56.599
<v Speaker 1>get in into all three and you don't know that

628
00:37:56.639 --> 00:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in advance. So that I did go to you you

629
00:38:03.960 --> 00:38:05.840
<v Speaker 1>spoke at three conferences at the same time.

630
00:38:06.239 --> 00:38:11.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I went to two conferences, like there were one

631
00:38:11.519 --> 00:38:14.400
<v Speaker 5>day apart in two different countries in Europe.

632
00:38:14.960 --> 00:38:20.280
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, even overlapped the overlap today and you got

633
00:38:20.480 --> 00:38:22.000
<v Speaker 3>late to the other conference.

634
00:38:22.800 --> 00:38:24.800
<v Speaker 5>I would even though I do know a speaker who

635
00:38:24.840 --> 00:38:31.199
<v Speaker 5>flew from It was Hilla Fish who flew from Dublin

636
00:38:31.400 --> 00:38:35.000
<v Speaker 5>to who spoke at a conference in Dublin, flew to

637
00:38:35.079 --> 00:38:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Germany to give her talk, and flew back to Dublin again,

638
00:38:39.519 --> 00:38:41.000
<v Speaker 5>both conferences at the same day.

639
00:38:41.840 --> 00:38:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

640
00:38:42.559 --> 00:38:44.400
<v Speaker 4>I would also add a rule of thumb for me

641
00:38:44.519 --> 00:38:46.920
<v Speaker 4>that it should be a conference that I can see

642
00:38:46.920 --> 00:38:50.199
<v Speaker 4>myself coming as a guest. I mean that that's I

643
00:38:50.199 --> 00:38:52.320
<v Speaker 4>think like that the top tiers of conferences that I

644
00:38:52.320 --> 00:38:54.719
<v Speaker 4>would apply to a conferences that I would want to

645
00:38:55.360 --> 00:38:57.719
<v Speaker 4>be in, even not as a speaker.

646
00:38:59.039 --> 00:39:02.559
<v Speaker 1>I forget, by the way, who it was. He's a

647
00:39:02.760 --> 00:39:05.679
<v Speaker 1>well known C plus plus speaker whose name escapes me

648
00:39:05.800 --> 00:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>right now, and he spoke at the conference that I

649
00:39:10.800 --> 00:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>also attended, and we went out for drinks afterward, and

650
00:39:14.000 --> 00:39:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he's one of those people who you know, goes from

651
00:39:16.400 --> 00:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>conference to conference to conference. And I asked him about,

652
00:39:19.880 --> 00:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, did he have any stressful experiences and he

653
00:39:23.440 --> 00:39:25.360
<v Speaker 1>told me of this time he was supposed to give

654
00:39:25.400 --> 00:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the closing keynoted the conference, and his flight was late,

655
00:39:29.440 --> 00:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so he literally got to the conference three minutes before

656
00:39:35.519 --> 00:39:39.079
<v Speaker 1>his talk, walked out of the taxi directly onto the stage,

657
00:39:39.119 --> 00:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and started speaking. So I asked them, were you really

658
00:39:42.760 --> 00:39:45.199
<v Speaker 1>stressed out? He said, kind of, but not as much

659
00:39:45.199 --> 00:39:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as the conference organizers, So so yes, conference organizing his

660
00:39:53.880 --> 00:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty stressful job, something I'm grateful that I've never done. Okay,

661
00:40:01.760 --> 00:40:05.039
<v Speaker 1>I agree with everything you said. And if there's one

662
00:40:05.039 --> 00:40:08.039
<v Speaker 1>annoying thing though, is that sometimes it's pretty difficult to

663
00:40:08.079 --> 00:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>figure out if a conference does or does not cover expenses.

664
00:40:11.440 --> 00:40:15.679
<v Speaker 1>It's it should be upfront and straightforward, and sometimes it's

665
00:40:15.719 --> 00:40:18.559
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It's not for some reason, and when it

666
00:40:18.880 --> 00:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>when it's not, it's kind of annoying. Let me see,

667
00:40:24.519 --> 00:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the next question I want to ask about. Oh, yeah,

668
00:40:27.440 --> 00:40:29.559
<v Speaker 1>this is a good one. How do you come up

669
00:40:29.599 --> 00:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>with the topics to talk about one of the before

670
00:40:32.920 --> 00:40:37.199
<v Speaker 1>you start answering one of the I really try to

671
00:40:37.239 --> 00:40:41.159
<v Speaker 1>convince people that I work with, that I interact with

672
00:40:41.199 --> 00:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>in the tech community to speak at conferences. And one

673
00:40:44.760 --> 00:40:49.119
<v Speaker 1>of the common responses that I hear is I don't

674
00:40:49.119 --> 00:40:52.199
<v Speaker 1>have anything to talk about. I have nothing interesting to tell.

675
00:40:52.599 --> 00:40:55.719
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing that I'm currently doing that's interesting to anybody

676
00:40:55.800 --> 00:41:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. Obviously that's not true, but there is

677
00:41:01.199 --> 00:41:03.280
<v Speaker 1>still a question of how to come up with the

678
00:41:03.320 --> 00:41:09.320
<v Speaker 1>actual confidence talk topics. So how do you go about it? Yeah,

679
00:41:09.480 --> 00:41:11.679
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you this time. You're never first.

680
00:41:15.880 --> 00:41:18.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So it's a it's a really good question, and

681
00:41:18.239 --> 00:41:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it changes throughout your career. So I would

682
00:41:22.000 --> 00:41:24.679
<v Speaker 4>say that if it's if it's an advice that I'm

683
00:41:24.719 --> 00:41:27.480
<v Speaker 4>giving to people that they want to talk about something

684
00:41:28.360 --> 00:41:31.280
<v Speaker 4>is like the first the first talk, that the first

685
00:41:31.280 --> 00:41:33.840
<v Speaker 4>topic that you're going to choose, that should be something

686
00:41:33.840 --> 00:41:37.119
<v Speaker 4>that you're very affluent in. You're very influent in, and

687
00:41:37.199 --> 00:41:40.199
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't matter if you feel that you you don't

688
00:41:40.239 --> 00:41:42.719
<v Speaker 4>have anything any value to give. You have value to give.

689
00:41:42.840 --> 00:41:45.000
<v Speaker 4>If that's something that you walk down, you have value

690
00:41:45.000 --> 00:41:50.960
<v Speaker 4>to give, definitely. But I would say that my choice

691
00:41:51.000 --> 00:41:54.880
<v Speaker 4>of topics now are combinations of either things that are

692
00:41:55.199 --> 00:41:57.519
<v Speaker 4>of interest to me, even if it's not something that

693
00:41:57.559 --> 00:42:00.519
<v Speaker 4>I do in my day job, but of interest to

694
00:42:00.559 --> 00:42:02.039
<v Speaker 4>me and I want to dive deep and I want

695
00:42:02.079 --> 00:42:05.360
<v Speaker 4>to be able to speak about them, or that's something

696
00:42:05.360 --> 00:42:09.000
<v Speaker 4>that I think would go well with the with the theme,

697
00:42:09.119 --> 00:42:11.199
<v Speaker 4>with the theme of the conference and the side gates

698
00:42:11.239 --> 00:42:14.159
<v Speaker 4>of the times, right, so I wouldn't give a talk

699
00:42:14.199 --> 00:42:15.960
<v Speaker 4>about react Tooks today.

700
00:42:15.880 --> 00:42:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Even ai ai ai.

701
00:42:19.480 --> 00:42:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Ya I saw twenty twenty four.

702
00:42:21.840 --> 00:42:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, now it's MCP. I think we're just the AI Yeah.

703
00:42:26.199 --> 00:42:26.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

704
00:42:26.679 --> 00:42:29.159
<v Speaker 1>And for some reason, I think you do know a

705
00:42:29.199 --> 00:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit about MCP.

706
00:42:30.880 --> 00:42:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, a little bit. Yeah, I read some tweets about it.

707
00:42:35.719 --> 00:42:39.000
<v Speaker 4>So so I think I think it's definitely it's definitely

708
00:42:39.000 --> 00:42:41.000
<v Speaker 4>a mix because it has to it has to be

709
00:42:41.000 --> 00:42:43.000
<v Speaker 4>something that you think would give value to the to

710
00:42:43.039 --> 00:42:46.119
<v Speaker 4>the audience, but it also it has to be something

711
00:42:46.119 --> 00:42:49.079
<v Speaker 4>that of interest to you. I wouldn't I wouldn't give

712
00:42:49.079 --> 00:42:52.039
<v Speaker 4>a talk about something that I wouldn't want to listen

713
00:42:52.039 --> 00:42:54.079
<v Speaker 4>to as a as an audience.

714
00:42:54.480 --> 00:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>How about you?

715
00:43:01.119 --> 00:43:04.679
<v Speaker 3>I think this question is also maybe maybe it's about

716
00:43:04.719 --> 00:43:06.679
<v Speaker 3>phrases in the career, but I also feel like there's

717
00:43:07.119 --> 00:43:10.000
<v Speaker 3>style to it, you know, like there are each like

718
00:43:10.519 --> 00:43:13.519
<v Speaker 3>there are lecturers that have like a style, like I

719
00:43:13.559 --> 00:43:16.679
<v Speaker 3>can say that I know. My style is to to

720
00:43:16.800 --> 00:43:21.599
<v Speaker 3>take deep, deep concepts and to break them up to

721
00:43:21.639 --> 00:43:24.119
<v Speaker 3>the to the smallest pieces, and like just to like

722
00:43:24.239 --> 00:43:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I love explaining how things work and and it kind

723
00:43:27.000 --> 00:43:29.760
<v Speaker 3>of goes also back to the beginning of this conversation

724
00:43:29.880 --> 00:43:33.480
<v Speaker 3>of what's in it for me? Only until I break

725
00:43:33.519 --> 00:43:37.199
<v Speaker 3>a subject deep like I'm basically explaining it to myself.

726
00:43:37.400 --> 00:43:42.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm building the ideal explanation for myself and sharing it.

727
00:43:42.559 --> 00:43:47.880
<v Speaker 3>So I do I take technologies that not that I

728
00:43:47.920 --> 00:43:51.320
<v Speaker 3>do feel like, not technologies that they don't like, but

729
00:43:51.519 --> 00:43:54.960
<v Speaker 3>I like to take technologies that are to take deep

730
00:43:55.199 --> 00:44:01.119
<v Speaker 3>concepts and and to research the f out of them.

731
00:44:01.800 --> 00:44:05.840
<v Speaker 3>And really, I also feel like that kind of is

732
00:44:07.239 --> 00:44:10.519
<v Speaker 3>what helps with the imposters syndrome for some people that

733
00:44:10.960 --> 00:44:13.920
<v Speaker 3>they think that they don't have something to talk about,

734
00:44:14.000 --> 00:44:17.159
<v Speaker 3>or that they don't know enough research the f out

735
00:44:17.199 --> 00:44:20.760
<v Speaker 3>of it until you know that you have value because

736
00:44:20.800 --> 00:44:22.480
<v Speaker 3>nobody has invested.

737
00:44:22.360 --> 00:44:24.920
<v Speaker 2>So much research in what you're going to talk about.

738
00:44:25.039 --> 00:44:28.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's kind of what I try to do when

739
00:44:28.400 --> 00:44:30.039
<v Speaker 3>I both talk about things.

740
00:44:30.320 --> 00:44:32.679
<v Speaker 2>I think I invest dozens of hours of research.

741
00:44:33.239 --> 00:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly, I think my son once told me something along

742
00:44:36.440 --> 00:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the lines of that if you've read a book about

743
00:44:38.880 --> 00:44:41.559
<v Speaker 1>some topic, then you know more about that topic than

744
00:44:41.679 --> 00:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy or eighty percent of the people in the world,

745
00:44:44.360 --> 00:44:49.039
<v Speaker 1>even if you've read just one book about it. So, yeah,

746
00:44:49.280 --> 00:44:53.519
<v Speaker 1>don't underestimate the knowledge that you gained by working on

747
00:44:53.559 --> 00:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a particular topic as part of your day job.

748
00:44:58.039 --> 00:45:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but also you need research, Yeah for sure, probably.

749
00:45:03.239 --> 00:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But the very least you know what to research. True

750
00:45:08.880 --> 00:45:10.079
<v Speaker 1>if you thought, how about you?

751
00:45:10.320 --> 00:45:13.519
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So for me, it's pretty easy, I think, because

752
00:45:13.719 --> 00:45:16.000
<v Speaker 5>I have my own niche that I only talk about

753
00:45:16.079 --> 00:45:21.000
<v Speaker 5>things that I build, So the topics are No, it's

754
00:45:21.039 --> 00:45:24.239
<v Speaker 5>actually not that easy because what I like doing and

755
00:45:24.320 --> 00:45:28.840
<v Speaker 5>my style of presentations is almost always live coding, So

756
00:45:28.960 --> 00:45:32.079
<v Speaker 5>I love and what I enjoy doing is take a

757
00:45:32.159 --> 00:45:35.000
<v Speaker 5>problem that I solved and break it down to the

758
00:45:35.039 --> 00:45:38.320
<v Speaker 5>audience in a way that actually teaches them something. And

759
00:45:38.480 --> 00:45:42.800
<v Speaker 5>the issue is and the challenges is identifying the small

760
00:45:42.920 --> 00:45:47.119
<v Speaker 5>enough but meaningful enough kind of problem for the audience

761
00:45:47.159 --> 00:45:50.760
<v Speaker 5>to actually relate to, but also be able to deliver

762
00:45:50.880 --> 00:45:54.840
<v Speaker 5>on a stage in a thirty minute timeframe. So what

763
00:45:54.960 --> 00:45:58.480
<v Speaker 5>I do is usually when building a library or when

764
00:45:58.480 --> 00:46:03.679
<v Speaker 5>building a tool, is find the lower level parts of

765
00:46:03.719 --> 00:46:07.440
<v Speaker 5>my libraries or the lower level solutions that I had

766
00:46:07.480 --> 00:46:10.519
<v Speaker 5>to come up with that I can actually share with

767
00:46:10.559 --> 00:46:14.000
<v Speaker 5>the audience and they will get some benefit from. So

768
00:46:14.559 --> 00:46:20.000
<v Speaker 5>sometimes it's a component of my system, just a unit

769
00:46:20.039 --> 00:46:22.559
<v Speaker 5>of my system. That I try to build together with

770
00:46:22.679 --> 00:46:27.440
<v Speaker 5>the audience and then create, and also something that I

771
00:46:27.480 --> 00:46:29.760
<v Speaker 5>had to solve, something that I needed to solve for myself,

772
00:46:30.079 --> 00:46:32.880
<v Speaker 5>and then walk the audience through the journey that I went.

773
00:46:33.320 --> 00:46:36.000
<v Speaker 5>So this is usually the type of talk that I choose,

774
00:46:36.320 --> 00:46:39.440
<v Speaker 5>and this is the topic that comes to mind, And

775
00:46:39.519 --> 00:46:42.800
<v Speaker 5>so it happens every time I continue building my tools

776
00:46:42.800 --> 00:46:46.920
<v Speaker 5>and adding more capabilities, I find new challenges and new

777
00:46:47.239 --> 00:46:50.159
<v Speaker 5>solutions for these challenges. So I come up with new

778
00:46:50.199 --> 00:46:53.400
<v Speaker 5>top ideas. And even though I have the same core

779
00:46:54.519 --> 00:46:57.360
<v Speaker 5>five main open source projects that I work on, the

780
00:46:57.480 --> 00:47:01.239
<v Speaker 5>talks never run out because I keep maintaining them and

781
00:47:01.320 --> 00:47:06.039
<v Speaker 5>keep coming up with new challenges as the story continues

782
00:47:06.119 --> 00:47:07.000
<v Speaker 5>with those packages.

783
00:47:08.760 --> 00:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Just a reminder to our audience that you were a

784
00:47:11.039 --> 00:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>guest on our show speaking about the VEST testing framework

785
00:47:15.039 --> 00:47:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or testing.

786
00:47:15.519 --> 00:47:17.480
<v Speaker 5>Library, validation framework.

787
00:47:17.320 --> 00:47:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Validation framework, or for forms, not for testing. It looks

788
00:47:20.760 --> 00:47:23.760
<v Speaker 1>like a testing library, but it's a form validation library.

789
00:47:24.360 --> 00:47:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Sorry for that confusion. Yeah, I totally aligned with that

790
00:47:31.480 --> 00:47:34.159
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that I think it has to do

791
00:47:34.239 --> 00:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>with a way of thinking. Whenever somebody like I said,

792
00:47:38.440 --> 00:47:42.280
<v Speaker 1>tells me that I don't actually have a topic. In

793
00:47:42.320 --> 00:47:45.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cases, I asked them, Okay, tell me

794
00:47:45.280 --> 00:47:48.880
<v Speaker 1>what you're currently working on. Tell me a problem that

795
00:47:48.960 --> 00:47:51.199
<v Speaker 1>you had to solve in the context of your work.

796
00:47:51.239 --> 00:47:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you've had to solve some problems. Now I'll show

797
00:47:55.559 --> 00:47:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you how you can take that topic and transform it

798
00:48:00.280 --> 00:48:03.119
<v Speaker 1>into a conference talk. So it's a kind of a

799
00:48:03.199 --> 00:48:06.559
<v Speaker 1>way of thinking of like you said, you're working on

800
00:48:06.599 --> 00:48:09.519
<v Speaker 1>a problem, you're solving a problem, and then it kind

801
00:48:09.519 --> 00:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of clicks, Hey, this can be a talk topic, a

802
00:48:13.000 --> 00:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>topic for a talk that I give it a conference.

803
00:48:15.639 --> 00:48:19.679
<v Speaker 1>And for me, at least in most cases, I don't

804
00:48:19.800 --> 00:48:23.480
<v Speaker 1>create talks for conferences. I don't know about you guys.

805
00:48:23.599 --> 00:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It works in a reverse. I have a talk idea,

806
00:48:26.599 --> 00:48:31.559
<v Speaker 1>I write it down, and then when conferences come along,

807
00:48:31.679 --> 00:48:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I try to align the the relevant ideas with the

808
00:48:36.280 --> 00:48:41.119
<v Speaker 1>talk with the conference based on what I perceived the

809
00:48:41.119 --> 00:48:46.760
<v Speaker 1>theme of the conference to be. It's it's very rare

810
00:48:46.840 --> 00:48:49.039
<v Speaker 1>for me to try to come up with a talk,

811
00:48:49.639 --> 00:48:53.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly or specifically for a conference just because I saw

812
00:48:53.039 --> 00:48:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a CFP for that conference. I won't say it never happened,

813
00:48:58.599 --> 00:49:00.639
<v Speaker 1>because I think it did, at least in the beginning,

814
00:49:00.800 --> 00:49:04.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's currently it's fairly rare for me. To do that. So, Okay,

815
00:49:04.960 --> 00:49:10.079
<v Speaker 1>you've got an idea, maybe you've written down the title,

816
00:49:10.320 --> 00:49:12.159
<v Speaker 1>you have some thoughts about what it is that you

817
00:49:12.199 --> 00:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>want to show, but now you need to actually turn

818
00:49:14.440 --> 00:49:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it into a CFP. That means a title, that means

819
00:49:18.360 --> 00:49:22.880
<v Speaker 1>an abstract. Sometimes there are additional fields that they require

820
00:49:22.920 --> 00:49:25.519
<v Speaker 1>you to feel, like, what's in it for the audience?

821
00:49:25.840 --> 00:49:28.559
<v Speaker 1>How did you do go about the research and what

822
00:49:28.719 --> 00:49:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth? How do you go

823
00:49:31.440 --> 00:49:34.320
<v Speaker 1>about that particular process.

824
00:49:34.960 --> 00:49:37.760
<v Speaker 2>You talk about finding a SAFP for a talk that

825
00:49:37.800 --> 00:49:38.639
<v Speaker 2>you've never given.

826
00:49:39.559 --> 00:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about taking a new talk idea that appeared

827
00:49:44.920 --> 00:49:50.039
<v Speaker 1>in your head and actually turning it into the content

828
00:49:50.079 --> 00:49:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that you fill in in the CFP form.

829
00:49:53.079 --> 00:49:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Because it's not like a two point thing.

830
00:49:55.800 --> 00:49:59.079
<v Speaker 3>You can do meetups like you can present it in

831
00:49:59.159 --> 00:50:01.400
<v Speaker 3>a non conference environment.

832
00:50:01.679 --> 00:50:04.599
<v Speaker 1>You know there is I'll put it differently. You need

833
00:50:04.679 --> 00:50:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to come up with a title, You need to come

834
00:50:06.840 --> 00:50:09.320
<v Speaker 1>up with an abstract. You need to come up with

835
00:50:09.679 --> 00:50:15.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe additional information about that conference talk proposal, and those

836
00:50:15.599 --> 00:50:18.599
<v Speaker 1>need to be attractive because at the end of the day,

837
00:50:19.519 --> 00:50:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a blind selection in most cases, and

838
00:50:24.840 --> 00:50:30.079
<v Speaker 1>a catchy title is better than a whole old hum

839
00:50:30.159 --> 00:50:34.119
<v Speaker 1>title and likewise with regard to the abstract, so those

840
00:50:34.159 --> 00:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>do make a difference. So my question is what's your

841
00:50:37.320 --> 00:50:40.679
<v Speaker 1>process for turning the idea into a title and an abstract.

842
00:50:43.000 --> 00:50:47.039
<v Speaker 4>First, first of all, I think it's it's it's pretty

843
00:50:47.079 --> 00:50:51.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe it's pretty obvious, but it's very helpful to keep

844
00:50:51.119 --> 00:50:55.880
<v Speaker 4>track of your past submissions because those you can't find

845
00:50:55.880 --> 00:50:58.360
<v Speaker 4>them anywhere if they're not on session EZ, so have

846
00:50:58.440 --> 00:51:00.840
<v Speaker 4>like a Google doc or something to track. First of

847
00:51:00.840 --> 00:51:03.320
<v Speaker 4>because it's very hepple to copy all of the other

848
00:51:03.480 --> 00:51:07.880
<v Speaker 4>relevant fields like bio and Twitter and links and everything,

849
00:51:08.320 --> 00:51:11.559
<v Speaker 4>and and the second and secondly, because some of the

850
00:51:11.599 --> 00:51:14.920
<v Speaker 4>talks are there, like variations of talks that you've already given,

851
00:51:15.000 --> 00:51:16.960
<v Speaker 4>so it's heppul to get them. But if it's a

852
00:51:17.000 --> 00:51:21.440
<v Speaker 4>new talk, I think that I'm also part of several committees,

853
00:51:21.679 --> 00:51:23.519
<v Speaker 4>so I know how it looks from the other side.

854
00:51:23.880 --> 00:51:28.199
<v Speaker 4>And as as much as you want to look into

855
00:51:28.239 --> 00:51:30.960
<v Speaker 4>every every submission in a committee, when you get a

856
00:51:31.039 --> 00:51:35.000
<v Speaker 4>thousand submissions, the title is very important and it should

857
00:51:35.000 --> 00:51:37.760
<v Speaker 4>be catchy, like you said, but it shouldn't be there.

858
00:51:37.880 --> 00:51:40.920
<v Speaker 4>It should be vague, so it shouldn't be like the

859
00:51:41.000 --> 00:51:43.880
<v Speaker 4>cool things that you can do with something. It should

860
00:51:43.920 --> 00:51:46.480
<v Speaker 4>be it should be aimed for the eyes of the

861
00:51:46.480 --> 00:51:49.880
<v Speaker 4>committee and afterwards for the eyes of the of the audience.

862
00:51:50.519 --> 00:51:53.280
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's an art of itself, of the title,

863
00:51:53.400 --> 00:51:56.280
<v Speaker 4>the title itself, and what.

864
00:51:56.280 --> 00:51:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Is the art?

865
00:51:58.000 --> 00:52:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the title is equal to the abstract?

866
00:52:01.920 --> 00:52:04.800
<v Speaker 4>So I think that. I mean, just think about yourself

867
00:52:04.840 --> 00:52:07.920
<v Speaker 4>as a conference goer. If even if you have the

868
00:52:07.960 --> 00:52:10.960
<v Speaker 4>agenda and you have four tracks of this conference, usually

869
00:52:10.960 --> 00:52:13.519
<v Speaker 4>what the title is everything you see, like if you

870
00:52:13.559 --> 00:52:15.320
<v Speaker 4>have an app or something, you have to click on

871
00:52:15.320 --> 00:52:17.960
<v Speaker 4>the title in order to read the abstract, right and

872
00:52:18.000 --> 00:52:18.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the time.

873
00:52:18.800 --> 00:52:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that's the second step.

874
00:52:20.800 --> 00:52:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Like as as a content committee myself, I think I

875
00:52:24.039 --> 00:52:26.880
<v Speaker 3>focus more on the abstract than on the title and

876
00:52:27.239 --> 00:52:29.440
<v Speaker 3>not the experience of the speaker right the way, which

877
00:52:29.480 --> 00:52:32.039
<v Speaker 3>is really likely the most important thing.

878
00:52:32.079 --> 00:52:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but that's not something that you can control. When

879
00:52:33.840 --> 00:52:36.639
<v Speaker 4>you when I mean you can you can build it

880
00:52:36.639 --> 00:52:38.599
<v Speaker 4>in a way that you look appealing, but that's not

881
00:52:38.599 --> 00:52:41.119
<v Speaker 4>something you can control and you submit to SEFP. So again,

882
00:52:41.159 --> 00:52:43.000
<v Speaker 4>I agree, the abstract is important. But the thing I

883
00:52:43.039 --> 00:52:45.000
<v Speaker 4>want to say, a lot of the conferences give you

884
00:52:45.159 --> 00:52:50.559
<v Speaker 4>another part of the form that are speaking points. So

885
00:52:50.719 --> 00:52:55.800
<v Speaker 4>it's super important to differentiate abstract from speaking points. Speaking

886
00:52:55.840 --> 00:52:58.480
<v Speaker 4>points that's only for the eyes of the committee. An

887
00:52:58.480 --> 00:53:02.880
<v Speaker 4>abstract that's something that the committee they need to to

888
00:53:02.960 --> 00:53:04.679
<v Speaker 4>want to have it in the conference, and they need

889
00:53:04.719 --> 00:53:08.000
<v Speaker 4>to also also think that the audience is going to

890
00:53:08.159 --> 00:53:12.199
<v Speaker 4>like this abstract, right, So so you're actually writing for

891
00:53:12.360 --> 00:53:15.679
<v Speaker 4>two audiences, for the committee and the and that this

892
00:53:16.000 --> 00:53:16.360
<v Speaker 4>that's something.

893
00:53:16.440 --> 00:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So how do it? So?

894
00:53:18.920 --> 00:53:20.639
<v Speaker 4>I think for me, you know, I've been to a

895
00:53:20.679 --> 00:53:23.039
<v Speaker 4>lot of conferences and I am I've been to a

896
00:53:23.079 --> 00:53:25.519
<v Speaker 4>lot of committees. So I write something that I would

897
00:53:25.639 --> 00:53:28.639
<v Speaker 4>find appealing. If I'm going to, for example, a topic

898
00:53:30.679 --> 00:53:33.880
<v Speaker 4>but react hooks. So I'm going to write the abstract

899
00:53:33.920 --> 00:53:37.920
<v Speaker 4>in a way that's going to to explain to people

900
00:53:37.920 --> 00:53:42.079
<v Speaker 4>that already know or already heard about hooks, why that's

901
00:53:42.079 --> 00:53:44.679
<v Speaker 4>something that's going to be new to them. Because no

902
00:53:44.760 --> 00:53:47.400
<v Speaker 4>one will go to UH today to talk that say

903
00:53:47.599 --> 00:53:50.360
<v Speaker 4>let's explain let's let's let me explain to you about hooks.

904
00:53:50.880 --> 00:53:54.320
<v Speaker 4>So that that has to be catchy and the title

905
00:53:54.400 --> 00:53:56.679
<v Speaker 4>I would I'm trying to refrain with the you know,

906
00:53:57.000 --> 00:53:59.880
<v Speaker 4>play on words, let's get hooked or something like that.

907
00:54:00.679 --> 00:54:04.360
<v Speaker 4>I really want to respect the intelligence of whoever is

908
00:54:04.400 --> 00:54:07.639
<v Speaker 4>reading that, and and the title should be informative but

909
00:54:08.400 --> 00:54:12.039
<v Speaker 4>eye catching. I mean it's a case by case, right.

910
00:54:12.840 --> 00:54:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you run your titles by other people to get

911
00:54:16.760 --> 00:54:18.840
<v Speaker 1>feedback your titles your out.

912
00:54:19.199 --> 00:54:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh definitely, yeah. At abstracts are something that are going

913
00:54:22.480 --> 00:54:26.079
<v Speaker 4>to be refined and refined and refined again. Yeah, definitely,

914
00:54:27.440 --> 00:54:31.559
<v Speaker 4>because it's helpful if you know people that like people

915
00:54:31.559 --> 00:54:34.440
<v Speaker 4>from committees or people that organize conferences, because they have

916
00:54:34.519 --> 00:54:37.800
<v Speaker 4>the best insights on that. But yeah, yeah, of course

917
00:54:37.920 --> 00:54:41.000
<v Speaker 4>I run it by people. I know people from the industry.

918
00:54:41.960 --> 00:54:43.760
<v Speaker 4>But do you think, would you go to this talk?

919
00:54:44.199 --> 00:54:47.960
<v Speaker 4>What do you think about about this abstract? Is it understandable?

920
00:54:48.000 --> 00:54:49.559
<v Speaker 4>Is it clear from the abstract that I'm going to

921
00:54:49.559 --> 00:54:52.400
<v Speaker 4>speak about ABC? Yeah? Definitely.

922
00:54:53.400 --> 00:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I I one of the talks that I am

923
00:54:57.039 --> 00:55:01.119
<v Speaker 1>giving this year at the con and I'll be speaking

924
00:55:01.159 --> 00:55:08.239
<v Speaker 1>at had a very different title and I it wasn't

925
00:55:08.280 --> 00:55:11.159
<v Speaker 1>accepted by a couple of conferences, and then I think,

926
00:55:11.239 --> 00:55:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I send it to tags and he suggested like a

927
00:55:15.480 --> 00:55:18.480
<v Speaker 1>completely different title for me, and we kind of settled

928
00:55:18.840 --> 00:55:21.559
<v Speaker 1>it was an iteration. I didn't immediately take his suggestion,

929
00:55:22.119 --> 00:55:24.440
<v Speaker 1>but we ended up on a very different title than

930
00:55:24.440 --> 00:55:28.119
<v Speaker 1>my original title, and apparently it works because it's gotten

931
00:55:28.159 --> 00:55:33.519
<v Speaker 1>accepted into two conferences. So yeah, for sure the title. Now,

932
00:55:33.960 --> 00:55:37.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously I can't know why it wasn't accepted before. Usually

933
00:55:37.880 --> 00:55:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't get the reason. But I do think the

934
00:55:41.400 --> 00:55:44.760
<v Speaker 1>new title is better. I recently had had the amusing

935
00:55:44.840 --> 00:55:47.840
<v Speaker 1>experience first time that this has happened to me. That

936
00:55:48.360 --> 00:55:54.119
<v Speaker 1>conference kind of censored my title, which is really so

937
00:55:54.960 --> 00:56:00.000
<v Speaker 1>my talk at no TLV is titled using heat.

938
00:56:00.119 --> 00:56:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Remember that one?

939
00:56:00.960 --> 00:56:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, you're one of the committee there, you're one

940
00:56:05.760 --> 00:56:08.039
<v Speaker 1>of the people who edited.

941
00:56:09.239 --> 00:56:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course you can't. I remember that title.

942
00:56:12.039 --> 00:56:17.519
<v Speaker 3>Now, so yeah, so no, please please say what was

943
00:56:17.559 --> 00:56:18.000
<v Speaker 3>the title?

944
00:56:18.079 --> 00:56:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Then I'll start with the please no, I'll start with

945
00:56:22.920 --> 00:56:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the current one, and then I'll tell the original one.

946
00:56:25.559 --> 00:56:27.280
<v Speaker 2>To talk about memory dumps.

947
00:56:27.000 --> 00:56:32.039
<v Speaker 1>Okay, to talk about hip dumps, memory dumps. So my

948
00:56:32.079 --> 00:56:36.599
<v Speaker 1>original title was taking a dump using heap dumps to

949
00:56:36.679 --> 00:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>find and fix no JS memory and CPU problems, and

950
00:56:39.960 --> 00:56:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you removed the taking a dump part.

951
00:56:45.920 --> 00:56:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I forgot about that. I want I want to give

952
00:56:50.960 --> 00:56:58.159
<v Speaker 3>a contradicting perception on this. And it happened to me

953
00:56:58.800 --> 00:57:04.599
<v Speaker 3>too that I filed cfpiece of talks that I haven't

954
00:57:04.639 --> 00:57:09.199
<v Speaker 3>given before. But to be honest, I I prefer to

955
00:57:09.199 --> 00:57:09.880
<v Speaker 3>present the.

956
00:57:09.880 --> 00:57:12.719
<v Speaker 2>Talk in my in my.

957
00:57:12.719 --> 00:57:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Local area, so like in meetups, and and then the

958
00:57:18.000 --> 00:57:20.880
<v Speaker 3>abstract is not like something I need to make up

959
00:57:21.000 --> 00:57:22.079
<v Speaker 3>or the title I need to make up.

960
00:57:22.079 --> 00:57:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I kind of like I.

961
00:57:23.400 --> 00:57:26.159
<v Speaker 3>Test run it in my local environment and then like

962
00:57:26.239 --> 00:57:30.159
<v Speaker 3>it also improves, and I and then I and then

963
00:57:30.199 --> 00:57:34.880
<v Speaker 3>I start submitting it, Like I don't really enjoy making

964
00:57:34.960 --> 00:57:39.280
<v Speaker 3>up abstract for that's what Also, that's pretty much what

965
00:57:39.360 --> 00:57:42.400
<v Speaker 3>makes it hard. And when you when you present a

966
00:57:42.480 --> 00:57:44.360
<v Speaker 3>talk in a meetup, they're not going to be like, oh,

967
00:57:44.400 --> 00:57:46.840
<v Speaker 3>your title is not perfect, your abstract is not this,

968
00:57:47.239 --> 00:57:50.639
<v Speaker 3>and you can take advantage of this local environment where

969
00:57:50.639 --> 00:57:54.119
<v Speaker 3>you can present it and to really like also define

970
00:57:54.440 --> 00:57:57.840
<v Speaker 3>your talk and understand the value that people get. And

971
00:57:57.840 --> 00:58:01.400
<v Speaker 3>and the abstract like again what kind of build itself.

972
00:58:01.559 --> 00:58:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's a.

973
00:58:02.239 --> 00:58:05.679
<v Speaker 3>Lot harder to write an abstract for a talk that

974
00:58:05.719 --> 00:58:08.760
<v Speaker 3>doesn't exist, Like it's it's a lot harder.

975
00:58:09.039 --> 00:58:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree, But I will ask you, do you get

976
00:58:13.159 --> 00:58:16.559
<v Speaker 1>feedback from meetups on the quality of your abstract?

977
00:58:17.719 --> 00:58:21.519
<v Speaker 3>Quight on the It's not about getting feedback on the

978
00:58:21.599 --> 00:58:26.880
<v Speaker 3>quality of the abstract, But I feel like what's hard

979
00:58:26.920 --> 00:58:29.840
<v Speaker 3>about writing an abstract for a talk that doesn't exist

980
00:58:30.000 --> 00:58:33.880
<v Speaker 3>is the fact that it doesn't exist. And when a

981
00:58:33.960 --> 00:58:37.559
<v Speaker 3>talk exists and you already know, like what what do

982
00:58:37.559 --> 00:58:38.039
<v Speaker 3>you what?

983
00:58:38.039 --> 00:58:41.039
<v Speaker 2>What is an abstract about? What? What is it's about? Saying?

984
00:58:41.559 --> 00:58:42.960
<v Speaker 2>What are you going to talk about?

985
00:58:43.119 --> 00:58:43.199
<v Speaker 3>Like?

986
00:58:43.280 --> 00:58:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Why is it interesting? Why is it valuable?

987
00:58:45.880 --> 00:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>What?

988
00:58:46.760 --> 00:58:48.159
<v Speaker 2>How does it solve a problem?

989
00:58:48.440 --> 00:58:51.039
<v Speaker 3>And those you go through this process when you build

990
00:58:51.039 --> 00:58:55.920
<v Speaker 3>a talk, and so the moment you have the talk,

991
00:58:55.960 --> 00:58:58.880
<v Speaker 3>you already have all the key takeaways.

992
00:58:59.000 --> 00:59:00.639
<v Speaker 2>But easier to an abstract.

993
00:59:00.760 --> 00:59:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree. But let's go back in time. Let's say

994
00:59:03.400 --> 00:59:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I was giving a talk five years ago about react

995
00:59:06.679 --> 00:59:09.239
<v Speaker 1>hooks when they were new. Okay, I think they were

996
00:59:09.280 --> 00:59:10.159
<v Speaker 1>new five years ago.

997
00:59:10.400 --> 00:59:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about something new. Why are we so stuck on?

998
00:59:12.920 --> 00:59:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just giving I'm just giving examples. So just something

999
00:59:16.480 --> 00:59:18.639
<v Speaker 1>that popped in my head. So I could say, like

1000
00:59:19.039 --> 00:59:22.519
<v Speaker 1>react hooks are the new mechanism for managing state blah

1001
00:59:22.559 --> 00:59:25.239
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. Or I can say the all new React

1002
00:59:25.280 --> 00:59:28.840
<v Speaker 1>hooks are the exciting new way like it. I think

1003
00:59:28.880 --> 00:59:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that you phrase things does make a difference,

1004
00:59:32.119 --> 00:59:32.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it.

1005
00:59:33.679 --> 00:59:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so, not unless you're worthy unless you're not.

1006
00:59:40.519 --> 00:59:42.320
<v Speaker 3>But but to be honest with they want to see

1007
00:59:42.320 --> 00:59:43.920
<v Speaker 3>that you know what you're talking about. They want to

1008
00:59:43.920 --> 00:59:45.960
<v Speaker 3>see that you use the right keywords, and you use

1009
00:59:46.000 --> 00:59:48.000
<v Speaker 3>the right keywords when you know what you're talking about.

1010
00:59:48.880 --> 00:59:52.119
<v Speaker 4>I actually, I think it does matter a lot because

1011
00:59:52.119 --> 00:59:55.440
<v Speaker 4>in most of the conferences, especially international, you don't get

1012
00:59:55.440 --> 00:59:59.239
<v Speaker 4>a chance to change the abstract. So of course you

1013
00:59:59.239 --> 01:00:00.519
<v Speaker 4>don't get a chance to change it.

1014
01:00:00.599 --> 01:00:02.320
<v Speaker 2>So I know of course you don't.

1015
01:00:02.119 --> 01:00:04.480
<v Speaker 4>So it should It should appeal, like I said, should

1016
01:00:04.480 --> 01:00:06.320
<v Speaker 4>appeal to the audience. It should appeal to the audience.

1017
01:00:06.400 --> 01:00:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Go to the conference. Gore, who now needs to decide

1018
01:00:09.480 --> 01:00:11.840
<v Speaker 4>is now at lunch and needs to decide what talks

1019
01:00:11.840 --> 01:00:14.480
<v Speaker 4>should I see after lunch, and they're like four different talks,

1020
01:00:14.960 --> 01:00:18.239
<v Speaker 4>so it needs to appeal to them as well. Volding

1021
01:00:18.320 --> 01:00:19.519
<v Speaker 4>is volding matters here.

1022
01:00:20.159 --> 01:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think if you tell we've skipped you you've got

1023
01:00:23.119 --> 01:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>anything you want to add to this?

1024
01:00:24.800 --> 01:00:27.039
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so just about what they had said. Actually, I

1025
01:00:27.079 --> 01:00:31.480
<v Speaker 5>think conferences are pretty laid back about changing the abstract.

1026
01:00:31.760 --> 01:00:33.960
<v Speaker 5>If it's a minor change, or if you want to

1027
01:00:33.960 --> 01:00:36.760
<v Speaker 5>add some information, it's okay. You can make changes both

1028
01:00:36.760 --> 01:00:39.079
<v Speaker 5>to the title and to the abstract as long as

1029
01:00:39.119 --> 01:00:41.960
<v Speaker 5>you're not replacing the entire talk. So this part I

1030
01:00:42.039 --> 01:00:45.800
<v Speaker 5>think is fine. But for me, the process is usually

1031
01:00:47.159 --> 01:00:50.400
<v Speaker 5>I usually just come up with something and it usually works.

1032
01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:54.519
<v Speaker 5>Like I come up with something, I come up with

1033
01:00:54.760 --> 01:00:57.920
<v Speaker 5>two three titles. I pick from them. I write a

1034
01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:03.880
<v Speaker 5>quick abstract that follow a very basic formula that I have,

1035
01:01:04.239 --> 01:01:06.840
<v Speaker 5>like what is the issue that I'm tackling, or what

1036
01:01:06.920 --> 01:01:11.360
<v Speaker 5>is what is the issue that I'm experiencing, what it

1037
01:01:11.400 --> 01:01:14.239
<v Speaker 5>is that I'm going to present, and what are you

1038
01:01:14.320 --> 01:01:16.880
<v Speaker 5>going to get out of it? It's going to be

1039
01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:20.599
<v Speaker 5>usually one to two sentences for each of these in

1040
01:01:20.639 --> 01:01:25.960
<v Speaker 5>the formula and for most cases and most conference talks

1041
01:01:25.960 --> 01:01:29.440
<v Speaker 5>that I send that that's the formula that it works,

1042
01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:33.920
<v Speaker 5>and the title I usually experiment with it. So I

1043
01:01:33.960 --> 01:01:37.519
<v Speaker 5>have two three titles, I send them to multiple conferences,

1044
01:01:37.800 --> 01:01:40.360
<v Speaker 5>and I see which one gets accepted first, and then

1045
01:01:40.400 --> 01:01:41.480
<v Speaker 5>I go on with that one.

1046
01:01:44.239 --> 01:01:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, I do have to say that I not only

1047
01:01:47.239 --> 01:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>had to change the abstract once, but I actually had

1048
01:01:49.840 --> 01:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to change the entire talk once. So I was I

1049
01:01:53.880 --> 01:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>got accepted to speak at I think it was CITYJS conference,

1050
01:01:58.079 --> 01:02:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and then I found that Ryan Carniato was speaking there.

1051
01:02:02.280 --> 01:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>As well, so we decided to collaborate and you know,

1052
01:02:06.599 --> 01:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>run our talks by each other. He was giving a keynote,

1053
01:02:09.800 --> 01:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I was giving a regular talk. So he went first

1054
01:02:13.159 --> 01:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and he gives me his keynote and I say, oops,

1055
01:02:16.480 --> 01:02:19.159
<v Speaker 1>there's a problem here, and he goes, what's the problem,

1056
01:02:19.199 --> 01:02:22.159
<v Speaker 1>is said, your keynote and my talk are the same.

1057
01:02:25.199 --> 01:02:30.119
<v Speaker 1>The organizers, Yeah, but look, he kind of his talk

1058
01:02:30.239 --> 01:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of evolved, so his title was a bit vague.

1059
01:02:33.639 --> 01:02:36.199
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not surprised that they didn't figure it out.

1060
01:02:36.360 --> 01:02:38.599
<v Speaker 1>But I then reached out to the organizer and I

1061
01:02:38.679 --> 01:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>told him, hey, look there's a problem here. Ryan's talk

1062
01:02:42.719 --> 01:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and my talk are the same talk. Maybe I should

1063
01:02:45.360 --> 01:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>switch a talk because he is a keynote after all.

1064
01:02:48.320 --> 01:02:50.599
<v Speaker 1>So we ended up doing that, so I gave a

1065
01:02:50.599 --> 01:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>different talk than the one that was actually initially accepted,

1066
01:02:53.920 --> 01:02:59.199
<v Speaker 1>which was funny anyway. You know, you you hang out

1067
01:02:59.239 --> 01:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>in the in Theseles long enough, and funny things happen

1068
01:03:02.719 --> 01:03:04.119
<v Speaker 1>in various conferences.

1069
01:03:04.599 --> 01:03:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, just one last thing on this topic, from the

1070
01:03:08.440 --> 01:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>content commit from the content committee seat. You choose people

1071
01:03:15.599 --> 01:03:19.119
<v Speaker 3>just as much as you choose sub like as you

1072
01:03:19.239 --> 01:03:20.800
<v Speaker 3>choose their abstract or title.

1073
01:03:21.760 --> 01:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes depending on the conference.

1074
01:03:24.480 --> 01:03:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, major conferences, that's true, they get a lot of

1075
01:03:27.519 --> 01:03:31.920
<v Speaker 3>submissions and you do want to shine because you're in

1076
01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:35.599
<v Speaker 3>a big competition. But for smaller conferences that are like

1077
01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:41.960
<v Speaker 3>open minded to giving people chances and sometimes, like I

1078
01:03:41.960 --> 01:03:44.880
<v Speaker 3>can say that in our conferences in Israel, if we

1079
01:03:44.960 --> 01:03:47.960
<v Speaker 3>see it, we focus on the person presenting. So if

1080
01:03:48.159 --> 01:03:51.880
<v Speaker 3>that person has experience and we like how how he

1081
01:03:51.920 --> 01:03:54.639
<v Speaker 3>stands on the stage, and we like how he creates content,

1082
01:03:54.679 --> 01:03:56.800
<v Speaker 3>and even if his subject is a bit off or

1083
01:03:56.800 --> 01:04:00.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe not spot on for the conference, we would we

1084
01:04:00.920 --> 01:04:04.119
<v Speaker 3>can approach them to like modify it. But I feel

1085
01:04:04.119 --> 01:04:06.239
<v Speaker 3>like the most important thing is to like get blood

1086
01:04:06.280 --> 01:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>on your hands and like speak, go out, talken meetups,

1087
01:04:09.800 --> 01:04:14.000
<v Speaker 3>like start small, but get that experience. It's quite hard

1088
01:04:14.039 --> 01:04:16.559
<v Speaker 3>to start from a conference without.

1089
01:04:16.280 --> 01:04:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Any prior experience on stage.

1090
01:04:18.480 --> 01:04:21.039
<v Speaker 3>And also it's hard for a committee to accept you

1091
01:04:21.280 --> 01:04:24.199
<v Speaker 3>when they don't have a lot of videos of your

1092
01:04:24.480 --> 01:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>like you know, a way to assess your abilities.

1093
01:04:27.559 --> 01:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we can't forget the fact that at the end

1094
01:04:29.840 --> 01:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>of the day, conferences very often need to sell tickets,

1095
01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:35.679
<v Speaker 1>and they need to get people excited to register, and

1096
01:04:35.719 --> 01:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>they need to get sponsorships and it's just easier to

1097
01:04:38.920 --> 01:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>do when you've got well known speakers as part of

1098
01:04:42.360 --> 01:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the conference. If everybody is new and unknown, it's more

1099
01:04:45.960 --> 01:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>challenging to get people excited about the conference.

1100
01:04:49.119 --> 01:04:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but what I'm saying is that it's more important

1101
01:04:54.039 --> 01:04:56.000
<v Speaker 3>to if you're in a new okay, if you're not

1102
01:04:56.039 --> 01:05:00.519
<v Speaker 3>a known speaker. So it's more important to file a

1103
01:05:00.599 --> 01:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>safe when you already have like some some way to

1104
01:05:04.480 --> 01:05:06.199
<v Speaker 3>give the committee to assess your abilities.

1105
01:05:06.760 --> 01:05:08.559
<v Speaker 2>So you you mean to start local.

1106
01:05:08.760 --> 01:05:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Doing started a meetup and have recordings of those meetups

1107
01:05:13.039 --> 01:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can send The challenge though, for at least

1108
01:05:15.800 --> 01:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>for Israeli speakers is that most meetups would be in Hebrew.

1109
01:05:20.320 --> 01:05:22.840
<v Speaker 2>You can speak in English and very type of features too.

1110
01:05:22.920 --> 01:05:25.280
<v Speaker 4>You can just say is it okay for speaking English,

1111
01:05:25.559 --> 01:05:26.719
<v Speaker 4>especially if it's recorded.

1112
01:05:27.400 --> 01:05:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and sometimes there are English speaking It happened to

1113
01:05:31.280 --> 01:05:33.440
<v Speaker 3>be a few times as I spoken meetups individual in

1114
01:05:33.480 --> 01:05:36.039
<v Speaker 3>English and there were English speakers in the crowds and

1115
01:05:36.239 --> 01:05:37.719
<v Speaker 3>they were really happy that they did so.

1116
01:05:38.239 --> 01:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Funnily, both no TLV and react Next wanted me

1117
01:05:42.039 --> 01:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to speak in English.

1118
01:05:42.920 --> 01:05:47.000
<v Speaker 4>So you know, I in my first meetup because I

1119
01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:49.559
<v Speaker 4>wanted it to be in English. I know. I knew

1120
01:05:49.559 --> 01:05:53.079
<v Speaker 4>there's someone in the audience who's speaking English. I said, okay,

1121
01:05:53.199 --> 01:05:55.159
<v Speaker 4>there's someone who's in English speakers, so I'll do it

1122
01:05:55.159 --> 01:05:57.119
<v Speaker 4>in English. And she said, no, it's okay, I know Hebrew.

1123
01:05:57.239 --> 01:05:58.800
<v Speaker 4>And I was like, okay, I'll do it in English anyway.

1124
01:05:59.159 --> 01:06:04.199
<v Speaker 1>So we still have a few questions. We're starting to

1125
01:06:04.280 --> 01:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>run out of time. I'll try to pick the interesting one.

1126
01:06:09.079 --> 01:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So we already suppose. I have one about getting accepted

1127
01:06:12.079 --> 01:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in the strategy. I think we already spoke about that,

1128
01:06:14.920 --> 01:06:19.519
<v Speaker 1>unless you have something special to add about getting into conferences.

1129
01:06:20.159 --> 01:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>For me, the only thing I would add is that

1130
01:06:22.360 --> 01:06:24.119
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, it's a numbers game

1131
01:06:25.440 --> 01:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and you just send a lot out there and you

1132
01:06:30.280 --> 01:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of rejections. But if you submit to

1133
01:06:34.920 --> 01:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>twenty and you get three, you get accepted into three.

1134
01:06:38.760 --> 01:06:43.239
<v Speaker 1>That's that's one in seven. But that's still good, and

1135
01:06:43.280 --> 01:06:48.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, no hard feelings, and keep on going. Any

1136
01:06:48.920 --> 01:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>other thing to add to that.

1137
01:06:50.760 --> 01:06:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Totally agree, Yeah, don't be discouraged if it takes time,

1138
01:06:55.079 --> 01:06:56.239
<v Speaker 5>because it does take time.

1139
01:06:57.639 --> 01:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And the same talk that didn't get accepted into

1140
01:07:01.960 --> 01:07:05.559
<v Speaker 1>five conferences suddenly gets accepted into a conference and then

1141
01:07:05.880 --> 01:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I said, you really only need one.

1142
01:07:08.039 --> 01:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like getting a date.

1143
01:07:12.840 --> 01:07:13.719
<v Speaker 2>It's a numbers game.

1144
01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a numbers game. When you or getting hired into

1145
01:07:19.800 --> 01:07:25.199
<v Speaker 1>a position, it's it's it's always playing the numbers, and

1146
01:07:25.239 --> 01:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>my dog is barking, um okay. Moving on quickly to

1147
01:07:30.079 --> 01:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the next question, how do you prepare the actual talk

1148
01:07:37.800 --> 01:07:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and slides? Is there a process that you have and

1149
01:07:40.320 --> 01:07:43.679
<v Speaker 1>also the structure of your slides do you like do

1150
01:07:43.760 --> 01:07:47.639
<v Speaker 1>you do mostly texts, mostly images, mostly live coding. I

1151
01:07:47.719 --> 01:07:50.159
<v Speaker 1>think if you you said that you only do live coding,

1152
01:07:50.599 --> 01:07:52.559
<v Speaker 1>what do you what do you have to say about that?

1153
01:07:53.880 --> 01:07:57.599
<v Speaker 5>So I think each one here in this panel has

1154
01:07:57.679 --> 01:08:04.360
<v Speaker 5>a completely different way of doing each of those. Me specifically,

1155
01:08:05.519 --> 01:08:08.239
<v Speaker 5>most of my presentations and most of my talks are

1156
01:08:08.280 --> 01:08:13.639
<v Speaker 5>structured in two. Half of it is a presentation slides,

1157
01:08:13.679 --> 01:08:16.399
<v Speaker 5>and the slides are very light on text, like two

1158
01:08:16.520 --> 01:08:21.600
<v Speaker 5>three words per per slide. And then I just chat.

1159
01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:26.479
<v Speaker 5>I don't have anything scripted. If there's jokes, there's jokes,

1160
01:08:26.479 --> 01:08:29.159
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. Whatever comes up when I speak. And

1161
01:08:29.239 --> 01:08:33.760
<v Speaker 5>that's the first half. I introduced a problem, I introduced

1162
01:08:32.920 --> 01:08:37.840
<v Speaker 5>the concept that I'm breaking down, and then I go forward,

1163
01:08:38.159 --> 01:08:43.399
<v Speaker 5>switch to my editor live code, and everything is pretty

1164
01:08:43.479 --> 01:08:48.520
<v Speaker 5>much downhill fall from there. No, it's it's usually works.

1165
01:08:49.039 --> 01:08:50.720
<v Speaker 5>It usually works most of the time.

1166
01:08:50.680 --> 01:08:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Not all.

1167
01:08:52.159 --> 01:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm re minded of this time. I like a long

1168
01:08:56.720 --> 01:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>time ago when I attended this. It wasn't really conference,

1169
01:09:00.680 --> 01:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it was more of a meetup thing, but it was

1170
01:09:03.680 --> 01:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>IBM presenting some technologies that they created. And I was

1171
01:09:06.760 --> 01:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>working in the enterprise software back then, and they had

1172
01:09:10.760 --> 01:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this thing called WebSphere and they had this editor called

1173
01:09:14.760 --> 01:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the clips and they were showing some integration or another clips. Yeah.

1174
01:09:20.039 --> 01:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, anyway, the guy was showing some wizard that

1175
01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>did something, and it was like the Wizard that with

1176
01:09:30.359 --> 01:09:34.039
<v Speaker 1>a hundred steps. So he goes he fills the one

1177
01:09:34.640 --> 01:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>thing in the wizard, and then the next, and then

1178
01:09:36.560 --> 01:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the next, and then the next and after forth. Something

1179
01:09:39.720 --> 01:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>like forty minutes, he gets to the final step in

1180
01:09:43.479 --> 01:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the wizard and the OK button or finish or start

1181
01:09:49.279 --> 01:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>or whatever is disabled, and he can't figure out why.

1182
01:09:54.399 --> 01:09:57.399
<v Speaker 1>So he starts backtracking to see if he missed putting

1183
01:09:57.479 --> 01:10:01.359
<v Speaker 1>in something, and the next by the end of the talk,

1184
01:10:01.439 --> 01:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>he was back at the beginning of the wizard and

1185
01:10:03.920 --> 01:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>he could never actually figure out that the why he

1186
01:10:07.800 --> 01:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't finish them with it. Yeah it was. It was sad,

1187
01:10:12.319 --> 01:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>but you know, these things happened. That's why I don't

1188
01:10:17.520 --> 01:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like life coding that much. I've done it. Sometimes it

1189
01:10:21.079 --> 01:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>has value. It has a wild value, that's for sure,

1190
01:10:24.319 --> 01:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>and the audience is usually on your side, although sometimes

1191
01:10:27.319 --> 01:10:29.239
<v Speaker 1>it feels like they're rooting for you to fail. It's

1192
01:10:29.239 --> 01:10:32.239
<v Speaker 1>like watching a person walking on a high wire. But

1193
01:10:33.239 --> 01:10:37.279
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, I've decided that it's it's not my style.

1194
01:10:37.319 --> 01:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>In most cases, I live.

1195
01:10:40.319 --> 01:10:46.119
<v Speaker 5>For the adrenaline, don't we allt it? And in regards

1196
01:10:46.119 --> 01:10:49.560
<v Speaker 5>because it was a two part question, the other part

1197
01:10:49.800 --> 01:10:53.399
<v Speaker 5>was about preparing for your talk. I think there was

1198
01:10:53.479 --> 01:10:57.079
<v Speaker 5>a very big discussion a few weeks ago on that

1199
01:10:57.199 --> 01:11:02.840
<v Speaker 5>WhatsApp group regarding whether we do dry runs or not.

1200
01:11:03.479 --> 01:11:09.279
<v Speaker 5>I usually do just one before before the talk, one time,

1201
01:11:09.399 --> 01:11:11.920
<v Speaker 5>not before each conference that I give that up, but

1202
01:11:12.079 --> 01:11:16.520
<v Speaker 5>once for each presentation, and then before I give a

1203
01:11:16.520 --> 01:11:19.960
<v Speaker 5>specific presentation, I just run by the slides see if

1204
01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:23.159
<v Speaker 5>I remember vaguely everything that I want to do, live

1205
01:11:23.239 --> 01:11:26.279
<v Speaker 5>code thing very quickly, just to see that I actually

1206
01:11:26.319 --> 01:11:29.079
<v Speaker 5>remember still how to code in the era of AI,

1207
01:11:29.640 --> 01:11:32.399
<v Speaker 5>and that's pretty much it I go on stage and

1208
01:11:32.439 --> 01:11:33.039
<v Speaker 5>present the thing.

1209
01:11:34.760 --> 01:11:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you're writing stuff down, so what do you

1210
01:11:37.159 --> 01:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>want to add?

1211
01:11:39.720 --> 01:11:46.800
<v Speaker 3>And it really depends on the subject because I kind

1212
01:11:46.800 --> 01:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>of feel like it builds itself, like the moment I

1213
01:11:50.359 --> 01:11:54.039
<v Speaker 3>start my research at some point and I'm trying to

1214
01:11:54.079 --> 01:11:59.119
<v Speaker 3>explain something to myself, Like for if anybody hasn't seen

1215
01:11:59.279 --> 01:12:04.760
<v Speaker 3>any of my talk, my style is mostly finding visualizations

1216
01:12:04.800 --> 01:12:11.520
<v Speaker 3>to to present, visualizing complex complex processes and.

1217
01:12:11.600 --> 01:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>What a picture is worth a thousand words? That's your star? Yes, yes,

1218
01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>but is it diagrams or is it literally just pictures?

1219
01:12:22.640 --> 01:12:25.359
<v Speaker 3>No, it's all moving. You see the whole flow of

1220
01:12:25.359 --> 01:12:29.960
<v Speaker 3>what goes where. I think every time you taught me,

1221
01:12:30.279 --> 01:12:34.159
<v Speaker 3>I think how to use a keynote, you created a monster.

1222
01:12:37.039 --> 01:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's really it's really style dependent.

1223
01:12:39.880 --> 01:12:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I I highly appreciate visualizations for my own learning as well,

1224
01:12:47.880 --> 01:12:53.720
<v Speaker 3>so I try to explain that the flow visually as

1225
01:12:53.800 --> 01:12:57.199
<v Speaker 3>much as I can. I also recently discovered that I

1226
01:12:57.279 --> 01:13:02.479
<v Speaker 3>enjoy life coding, and so I recently gave recently gave

1227
01:13:02.479 --> 01:13:04.560
<v Speaker 3>a talk and it was so fun and natural.

1228
01:13:05.439 --> 01:13:06.159
<v Speaker 2>But it was.

1229
01:13:06.119 --> 01:13:10.720
<v Speaker 3>A subject I'm very, very fluent in, so I'm sure

1230
01:13:10.720 --> 01:13:12.439
<v Speaker 3>it has a lot a lot to do with that

1231
01:13:12.640 --> 01:13:16.319
<v Speaker 3>with that, but yeah, usually what I focus on is

1232
01:13:16.640 --> 01:13:20.800
<v Speaker 3>finding the most perfect visualization and analogies to present to

1233
01:13:21.319 --> 01:13:24.039
<v Speaker 3>explain very complicated subjects.

1234
01:13:24.359 --> 01:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm are you guys familiar with Toma Gabel?

1235
01:13:29.079 --> 01:13:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1236
01:13:29.760 --> 01:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I probably should have invited him as well as

1237
01:13:31.880 --> 01:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a good friend and great public speaker. His style, for example,

1238
01:13:35.720 --> 01:13:40.119
<v Speaker 1>is usually having this one big, amusing picture and like

1239
01:13:40.760 --> 01:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>a word or two or a short sentence on each

1240
01:13:43.399 --> 01:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>slide and Lessi's showing diagrams. So that's also a style

1241
01:13:49.039 --> 01:13:52.119
<v Speaker 1>that you can do. It's challenging because you do need

1242
01:13:52.159 --> 01:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>to find pictures that actually convey the relevant meaning, and

1243
01:13:56.479 --> 01:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not always easy. It might be easier in this

1244
01:14:00.079 --> 01:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>day and age of AI generated images, but you know,

1245
01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so sure.

1246
01:14:06.600 --> 01:14:10.039
<v Speaker 3>It sure is easier. And again, it really depends on

1247
01:14:10.319 --> 01:14:12.680
<v Speaker 3>what kind of talk is it.

1248
01:14:12.760 --> 01:14:13.800
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about?

1249
01:14:13.840 --> 01:14:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Like I think there is and I find myself with

1250
01:14:15.960 --> 01:14:18.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of visualizations is because I choose very very

1251
01:14:19.199 --> 01:14:23.239
<v Speaker 3>deep topics and then like breaking them down is visualization

1252
01:14:23.359 --> 01:14:25.000
<v Speaker 3>is a very easy way to break.

1253
01:14:24.720 --> 01:14:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Down these complex concepts.

1254
01:14:28.920 --> 01:14:30.800
<v Speaker 3>But if you're talking about like a feature that you

1255
01:14:30.840 --> 01:14:35.239
<v Speaker 3>didn't work or something that like the code the visualization

1256
01:14:35.760 --> 01:14:38.000
<v Speaker 3>or maybe you can even talk about it in human

1257
01:14:38.079 --> 01:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>language and people can understand.

1258
01:14:39.640 --> 01:14:41.479
<v Speaker 2>Like there's no right answer.

1259
01:14:41.720 --> 01:14:45.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's all very dependent on the context, how.

1260
01:14:45.680 --> 01:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>About you, leiad.

1261
01:14:48.199 --> 01:14:52.800
<v Speaker 4>So I try to look at my talks when it's possible,

1262
01:14:53.479 --> 01:14:56.680
<v Speaker 4>as like a visual journey. So I'm more like on

1263
01:14:56.720 --> 01:14:59.640
<v Speaker 4>the side of entertainment, I try to tell a story,

1264
01:14:59.640 --> 01:15:02.199
<v Speaker 4>which means I'm trying to choose a theme for the

1265
01:15:02.319 --> 01:15:05.000
<v Speaker 4>well in the visual side that some sort of a

1266
01:15:05.079 --> 01:15:10.079
<v Speaker 4>theme and then have strong visuals that are really compelling

1267
01:15:10.520 --> 01:15:13.880
<v Speaker 4>and when I when I come to build the presentation.

1268
01:15:13.960 --> 01:15:17.960
<v Speaker 4>So my presentations are a really key part of my

1269
01:15:18.199 --> 01:15:21.920
<v Speaker 4>talk in my in my eyes, it's not something that

1270
01:15:21.960 --> 01:15:27.399
<v Speaker 4>accompanies me. It's it's the idea. So I'm trying to

1271
01:15:27.439 --> 01:15:31.000
<v Speaker 4>think of the one takeaway that I want people to

1272
01:15:31.119 --> 01:15:33.600
<v Speaker 4>take from from the entire talk, like the one sentence

1273
01:15:33.600 --> 01:15:36.119
<v Speaker 4>that people would describe but what this talk was about.

1274
01:15:36.880 --> 01:15:39.840
<v Speaker 4>That also helped me when I'm building the presentation to

1275
01:15:39.880 --> 01:15:41.960
<v Speaker 4>see that I still stick to that sentence and I

1276
01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:46.840
<v Speaker 4>didn't diverge. I try to identify the three takeaway points

1277
01:15:46.840 --> 01:15:49.800
<v Speaker 4>that I can divide my talk to to three. But

1278
01:15:49.920 --> 01:15:52.840
<v Speaker 4>these three three stages, especially if it's a technical talk,

1279
01:15:53.119 --> 01:15:55.359
<v Speaker 4>so you need to start with something light and then

1280
01:15:55.479 --> 01:15:58.000
<v Speaker 4>dive deeper and then come out with something like in

1281
01:15:58.039 --> 01:16:02.159
<v Speaker 4>the medium. And I give myself a key of three

1282
01:16:02.199 --> 01:16:04.960
<v Speaker 4>slides per minute, which I know it sounds a lot,

1283
01:16:05.079 --> 01:16:07.479
<v Speaker 4>but in my in my style, when I do a

1284
01:16:07.520 --> 01:16:10.359
<v Speaker 4>lot of animations and a lot of transition between slides,

1285
01:16:10.399 --> 01:16:13.039
<v Speaker 4>it actually makes sense. It's a good beverage. Three slides

1286
01:16:13.079 --> 01:16:16.359
<v Speaker 4>a minute. And also I try to allocate one hour

1287
01:16:16.479 --> 01:16:18.960
<v Speaker 4>for every minute of the of the like one hour

1288
01:16:19.159 --> 01:16:21.399
<v Speaker 4>of building every minute of the presentation.

1289
01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot.

1290
01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean that's like that you know that that's

1291
01:16:24.720 --> 01:16:30.399
<v Speaker 4>the maximum. But I'm trying to build a really visual presentation.

1292
01:16:30.680 --> 01:16:33.359
<v Speaker 4>So so this is my style and this is what

1293
01:16:33.439 --> 01:16:37.520
<v Speaker 4>I enjoy building, and I also enjoyed being in the

1294
01:16:37.560 --> 01:16:40.279
<v Speaker 4>audience in in in those kind of talks.

1295
01:16:40.439 --> 01:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I have found that my question go for it.

1296
01:16:42.840 --> 01:16:45.399
<v Speaker 3>And I just wanted to ask you about the takeaways.

1297
01:16:46.359 --> 01:16:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Aren't they sometimes emergent from the process, like they always

1298
01:16:50.600 --> 01:16:51.199
<v Speaker 3>pretty fine?

1299
01:16:51.239 --> 01:16:55.479
<v Speaker 2>Like, oh no, I sometimes I find the message throughout working.

1300
01:16:55.840 --> 01:16:59.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's that's a really good point, because you're right

1301
01:16:59.199 --> 01:17:02.239
<v Speaker 4>the emergent, but I try to keep them two three.

1302
01:17:02.560 --> 01:17:04.279
<v Speaker 4>So if I if I take a look back at

1303
01:17:04.359 --> 01:17:07.479
<v Speaker 4>my presentation and I see, oh I spoke about like

1304
01:17:07.600 --> 01:17:11.359
<v Speaker 4>five different topics, that's obviously a lot for an audience

1305
01:17:11.399 --> 01:17:15.520
<v Speaker 4>to to digest. So I try to minimize them into

1306
01:17:15.560 --> 01:17:18.960
<v Speaker 4>like three subhaders. Yeah, sometimes somes, I can think of

1307
01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:21.439
<v Speaker 4>them in advance. They always change. I always emergent, like

1308
01:17:21.479 --> 01:17:24.560
<v Speaker 4>you said, But all the time I try to keep

1309
01:17:24.600 --> 01:17:27.760
<v Speaker 4>it on like one sentence. If someone would go out

1310
01:17:27.760 --> 01:17:30.439
<v Speaker 4>of this this talk and someone asked him what was

1311
01:17:30.439 --> 01:17:33.359
<v Speaker 4>this talk about, and you'll say this one sentence, I

1312
01:17:33.399 --> 01:17:35.359
<v Speaker 4>wanted to be what I meant for it to be.

1313
01:17:36.079 --> 01:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree that tech talks should preferably have a

1314
01:17:43.720 --> 01:17:48.319
<v Speaker 1>city what's known as a cita, some sort of call

1315
01:17:48.399 --> 01:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to action, kind of like websites should have a certain

1316
01:17:51.640 --> 01:17:56.279
<v Speaker 1>call to action that means it's you know, some speakers

1317
01:17:56.359 --> 01:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can give talks that are just pure entertainment and maybe

1318
01:18:00.039 --> 01:18:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and the culture action is have a good time. I'm

1319
01:18:04.439 --> 01:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>not there. There needs to be some takeaway out of this. Now,

1320
01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely correct real that the takeaway can and often

1321
01:18:15.039 --> 01:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>does evolve during the talk. But if I if coming

1322
01:18:20.680 --> 01:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>into the talk, I don't have even a vague concept

1323
01:18:24.079 --> 01:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of what I want the audience to take away from

1324
01:18:26.720 --> 01:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the talk. That's a problem, that's in an indication that

1325
01:18:31.319 --> 01:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>my conception of the topic is premature. Also, I have found,

1326
01:18:39.039 --> 01:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that my presentation style tends to change

1327
01:18:42.439 --> 01:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and vary. Sometimes I mix it up just for fun.

1328
01:18:45.520 --> 01:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the topic demands a certain style of presentation rather

1329
01:18:52.640 --> 01:19:00.479
<v Speaker 1>than another. For example, yeah, sometimes i'm more or like

1330
01:19:00.560 --> 01:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I said, I go the I have done a couple

1331
01:19:03.920 --> 01:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of live coding talks because sometimes I intentionally want to

1332
01:19:08.680 --> 01:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>show that a certain process is really easy to implement

1333
01:19:12.560 --> 01:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or straightforward to implement. That's usually when I will do

1334
01:19:15.880 --> 01:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a live coding session, because if it's complicated, there's not

1335
01:19:20.039 --> 01:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>just not going to be enough time, or I'm going

1336
01:19:21.880 --> 01:19:24.279
<v Speaker 1>to rush through it if there's too much code on

1337
01:19:24.279 --> 01:19:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the screen. By the way, my number one tip for

1338
01:19:28.439 --> 01:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>anybody creating a presentation is make your font as big

1339
01:19:34.560 --> 01:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>as possible, and then make it bigger and and and

1340
01:19:40.880 --> 01:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>then make it even bigger.

1341
01:19:42.640 --> 01:19:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1342
01:19:42.960 --> 01:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And if that means having less texts on the slide, good,

1343
01:19:48.359 --> 01:19:51.079
<v Speaker 1>have less texts on the slide, Have as little text

1344
01:19:51.159 --> 01:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>on the slide as possible. That way I like to make.

1345
01:19:56.119 --> 01:20:00.000
<v Speaker 3>To say about that about like as little texts as possible.

1346
01:20:01.159 --> 01:20:03.439
<v Speaker 3>What I like to do is I like to write

1347
01:20:03.479 --> 01:20:08.000
<v Speaker 3>down the messages that I want to think, like the

1348
01:20:08.319 --> 01:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>deepest thing I want some When I say a sentence

1349
01:20:11.600 --> 01:20:14.000
<v Speaker 3>and I want the audience to remember the sentence as

1350
01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:15.640
<v Speaker 3>I said it, I write it down.

1351
01:20:17.640 --> 01:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>The worst thing you can do do is have a

1352
01:20:19.800 --> 01:20:22.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of text on the screen, because then what ends

1353
01:20:22.359 --> 01:20:26.039
<v Speaker 1>up is the audience reads the texts rather than listen

1354
01:20:26.119 --> 01:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to you, and it becomes a show and tell or

1355
01:20:31.039 --> 01:20:35.319
<v Speaker 1>a document rather than a presentation. By the way, one

1356
01:20:35.399 --> 01:20:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that I have with live coding is

1357
01:20:38.239 --> 01:20:44.039
<v Speaker 1>that in many cases that unless you can really distill

1358
01:20:44.239 --> 01:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the issue down, you might end up with too much

1359
01:20:48.359 --> 01:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>code on the screen at once. And that's a challenge.

1360
01:20:54.359 --> 01:20:56.239
<v Speaker 4>Now to mention that your idea is full of a

1361
01:20:56.239 --> 01:20:58.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of other things that are not the code, so

1362
01:20:59.439 --> 01:21:00.560
<v Speaker 4>these are also distracting.

1363
01:21:00.960 --> 01:21:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, then, well there are presentation modes in modern ideas.

1364
01:21:05.199 --> 01:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But still you're correct.

1365
01:21:08.439 --> 01:21:10.079
<v Speaker 3>I would even say that when you have a lot

1366
01:21:10.119 --> 01:21:14.079
<v Speaker 3>of text, not only that, the audience isn't isn't listening

1367
01:21:14.079 --> 01:21:18.000
<v Speaker 3>to you because they're reading You're actually it's a cognitive

1368
01:21:19.319 --> 01:21:24.159
<v Speaker 3>you're hurting them cognitively because they're suffering because somebody is

1369
01:21:24.199 --> 01:21:26.640
<v Speaker 3>speaking to them while they are reading something.

1370
01:21:27.560 --> 01:21:29.720
<v Speaker 4>And then you have two bad choices. You're either reading

1371
01:21:29.920 --> 01:21:32.359
<v Speaker 4>exactly what the text is and that way you're wasting

1372
01:21:32.399 --> 01:21:35.439
<v Speaker 4>their time because you're reading slower than they can read. Oh,

1373
01:21:35.520 --> 01:21:38.399
<v Speaker 4>you're trying to summarize what the text means. And then,

1374
01:21:38.479 --> 01:21:40.920
<v Speaker 4>like a real said, it's like two conflicting streams.

1375
01:21:40.920 --> 01:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Of the only time that I might have text like

1376
01:21:44.960 --> 01:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in the sort that I might kind of read text

1377
01:21:47.640 --> 01:21:50.319
<v Speaker 1>off the slide is when I'm reading out a definition

1378
01:21:50.520 --> 01:21:54.079
<v Speaker 1>of a thing if it's really important, or a quote

1379
01:21:54.119 --> 01:21:57.079
<v Speaker 1>if it's really you're absolutely correct, if it's really important

1380
01:21:57.079 --> 01:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for me to read a quote, and it needs to

1381
01:21:58.960 --> 01:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>be a short quote or definition. And again it needs

1382
01:22:01.880 --> 01:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to be a short definition. And I literally said, and

1383
01:22:05.479 --> 01:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in the case of definitions, are literally organized over each

1384
01:22:08.760 --> 01:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>word trying to remove it. And and only that's the

1385
01:22:13.640 --> 01:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>only case, and usually there might be like one or

1386
01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe two slides like that, and that's it. The rest

1387
01:22:19.920 --> 01:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>need to be bullets that I expand on. They're not

1388
01:22:24.680 --> 01:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>intended to be read as as such. They're more is

1389
01:22:28.199 --> 01:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a reminder to me and to the audience after I

1390
01:22:31.840 --> 01:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>said something, rather than the actual text of what I'm saying.

1391
01:22:36.159 --> 01:22:38.000
<v Speaker 4>By the way, small tip if you do have a

1392
01:22:38.079 --> 01:22:40.720
<v Speaker 4>sentence on the screen is to highlight one or two

1393
01:22:40.800 --> 01:22:43.439
<v Speaker 4>words that are the essence of this sentence and then

1394
01:22:43.720 --> 01:22:47.199
<v Speaker 4>everyone in the audience can just attach these words and understand.

1395
01:22:47.279 --> 01:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just don't underline them, because then everybody will think

1396
01:22:49.760 --> 01:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>there are links.

1397
01:22:51.199 --> 01:22:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah they try to click there.

1398
01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Okay, let's see like we have I think we're

1399
01:22:58.720 --> 01:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>almost out of time, but so do you have so

1400
01:23:05.079 --> 01:23:11.279
<v Speaker 1>one kind of final question or I'll mix two questions

1401
01:23:11.319 --> 01:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>together and you decide which one you want to answer.

1402
01:23:13.840 --> 01:23:17.239
<v Speaker 1>So one question is we kind of touched on that

1403
01:23:17.600 --> 01:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>on the dry runs, is that how do you prepare

1404
01:23:20.239 --> 01:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for delivering a talk? And the second question, the final question,

1405
01:23:24.119 --> 01:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>would be about the entertainment versus informative or specifically do

1406
01:23:31.760 --> 01:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you put jokes in your talk? So let's start with

1407
01:23:34.880 --> 01:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the first one. How do you prepare? Do you if

1408
01:23:37.920 --> 01:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you tell you mentioned that you do one dry run

1409
01:23:41.800 --> 01:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for a talk or at least whenever you significantly change

1410
01:23:44.840 --> 01:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a talk or introduce a new talk. How about lead Arielle,

1411
01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>do you also do dry runs or not at all

1412
01:23:51.640 --> 01:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>or multiple dry runs? How do you go about it?

1413
01:23:56.119 --> 01:23:58.359
<v Speaker 2>You want to go firstly, and I can.

1414
01:23:59.279 --> 01:24:01.840
<v Speaker 4>I think it's to do dry run, and if only

1415
01:24:01.880 --> 01:24:03.840
<v Speaker 4>for the sake of just to see that you're on

1416
01:24:04.039 --> 01:24:07.640
<v Speaker 4>time or at least exactly less and the time that

1417
01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:12.600
<v Speaker 4>you're given, because that's something that's really hard to estimate.

1418
01:24:12.640 --> 01:24:15.239
<v Speaker 4>When you're walking on a talk. You can feel like

1419
01:24:15.279 --> 01:24:18.439
<v Speaker 4>you're on time, but you always, first of all, on stage,

1420
01:24:18.439 --> 01:24:22.000
<v Speaker 4>you always speak slower than us. Then you think you're

1421
01:24:22.039 --> 01:24:24.880
<v Speaker 4>going to speak like it takes more time, and if

1422
01:24:24.880 --> 01:24:28.119
<v Speaker 4>you have ninety slides, there's no way to estimate how long.

1423
01:24:28.600 --> 01:24:32.039
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's the reverse though. I remember speaking at a conference.

1424
01:24:32.119 --> 01:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I was after some speaker, so I was lazing out

1425
01:24:35.960 --> 01:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in the speaker's room looking at the clock. So, okay,

1426
01:24:38.399 --> 01:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I still have twenty minutes. And she finished like she

1427
01:24:43.600 --> 01:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>finished a thirty minutes talk in ten minutes. So the

1428
01:24:48.920 --> 01:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>host runs up to me and says, come down, come down,

1429
01:24:52.760 --> 01:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And it was.

1430
01:24:53.720 --> 01:24:54.319
<v Speaker 4>A dry run.

1431
01:24:54.319 --> 01:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Could have solved it, Dragon, could have solved it. But

1432
01:24:57.720 --> 01:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree. I actually, literally I did a dry

1433
01:25:00.800 --> 01:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>run of a talk today, of a new talk that

1434
01:25:02.920 --> 01:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving it at the conference. And I did it

1435
01:25:07.319 --> 01:25:10.239
<v Speaker 1>precisely because I wanted to make sure that it actually

1436
01:25:10.239 --> 01:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>fits into the loaded time and I was like two

1437
01:25:15.520 --> 01:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes too long something like that on a twenty something

1438
01:25:19.920 --> 01:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>minute talk, So you know, I need to adjust it

1439
01:25:23.960 --> 01:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But the other point was that during

1440
01:25:27.800 --> 01:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this dry run it I realized after when I got

1441
01:25:32.600 --> 01:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the feedback, it's important to get feedback from the people

1442
01:25:35.760 --> 01:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>you give the dry run too, otherwise what's the point.

1443
01:25:38.720 --> 01:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And I realized that one of the things that I

1444
01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was trying to get across was not sufficiently clear, and

1445
01:25:46.680 --> 01:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I need to change one of my examples because of that.

1446
01:25:49.800 --> 01:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>So I know how I'm going to change it based

1447
01:25:52.479 --> 01:25:55.239
<v Speaker 1>on the feedback that I got from that dry run.

1448
01:25:55.479 --> 01:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But I do that one dry run, not multiple dry run,

1449
01:25:59.680 --> 01:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and I will want to add one more thing. And

1450
01:26:03.560 --> 01:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>that's my own personal tip, as it were for people

1451
01:26:07.439 --> 01:26:12.479
<v Speaker 1>listening to us. I don't I never try to memorize

1452
01:26:12.520 --> 01:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>an entire talk. It just doesn't work. But I do

1453
01:26:17.079 --> 01:26:20.279
<v Speaker 1>write down and try to memorize my first two or

1454
01:26:20.319 --> 01:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>three sentences because that way I can get up and running.

1455
01:26:25.079 --> 01:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to worry about coming on stage and

1456
01:26:27.239 --> 01:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>go like, ugh, I'm stuck, I don't know what to say.

1457
01:26:29.960 --> 01:26:32.239
<v Speaker 1>I know what my first two or three sentences are

1458
01:26:32.279 --> 01:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be. I memorize those. Sometimes I kind of

1459
01:26:34.760 --> 01:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>even riff on those, but I still at least know

1460
01:26:38.960 --> 01:26:41.239
<v Speaker 1>what I'm going to say, and from that point on

1461
01:26:41.439 --> 01:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>it flows. Oh yeah, what about you.

1462
01:26:46.319 --> 01:26:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm a nerd.

1463
01:26:47.600 --> 01:26:51.760
<v Speaker 3>I do a lot of dry runs a lot, and

1464
01:26:53.119 --> 01:26:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I try to get as much feedback as I can,

1465
01:26:57.600 --> 01:27:01.079
<v Speaker 3>and because I really try to take advantage topics but

1466
01:27:01.319 --> 01:27:05.439
<v Speaker 3>to make them accessible, so even even for let's say

1467
01:27:05.479 --> 01:27:08.600
<v Speaker 3>less experienced developers, and I want to talk about something deep,

1468
01:27:08.640 --> 01:27:13.239
<v Speaker 3>so I try to also collect feedback from a variety

1469
01:27:13.319 --> 01:27:18.920
<v Speaker 3>of of of levels of developers. And that way, like

1470
01:27:19.840 --> 01:27:23.399
<v Speaker 3>when I do so many dry runs, I also like

1471
01:27:23.479 --> 01:27:26.239
<v Speaker 3>I collect feedback and I make sure I also feel

1472
01:27:26.279 --> 01:27:28.199
<v Speaker 3>like my talk is so complete.

1473
01:27:27.840 --> 01:27:30.239
<v Speaker 2>By the time I finished with.

1474
01:27:30.159 --> 01:27:35.479
<v Speaker 3>This like hard work process. And I also know that

1475
01:27:35.520 --> 01:27:38.279
<v Speaker 3>it's adaptable for I know wich levels it's adaptable for.

1476
01:27:38.720 --> 01:27:41.319
<v Speaker 3>And I never have to worry about time. I never

1477
01:27:41.399 --> 01:27:44.880
<v Speaker 3>have to worry about remembering. You can wake me up

1478
01:27:44.880 --> 01:27:46.800
<v Speaker 3>at three am, and I remember it because I've did

1479
01:27:46.840 --> 01:27:49.399
<v Speaker 3>it like five times before I got.

1480
01:27:49.079 --> 01:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Don't don't you sometimes feel like you're overdoing it, like

1481
01:27:54.239 --> 01:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>too much of a good thing, as it were, overdoing it,

1482
01:28:00.119 --> 01:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>like to like.

1483
01:28:00.600 --> 01:28:02.319
<v Speaker 2>Do the collect the feedback together.

1484
01:28:02.399 --> 01:28:05.039
<v Speaker 3>So like I would invite like you know, four or

1485
01:28:05.039 --> 01:28:07.000
<v Speaker 3>five friends and I do a dry run for like

1486
01:28:07.039 --> 01:28:08.680
<v Speaker 3>a few friends together, like I did with the.

1487
01:28:08.760 --> 01:28:10.560
<v Speaker 2>AD and I did with the Betel And.

1488
01:28:12.199 --> 01:28:17.239
<v Speaker 3>You're very welcome to I'm building a new talk, so

1489
01:28:17.560 --> 01:28:20.479
<v Speaker 3>you only add can come all of three of you. Yeah,

1490
01:28:20.840 --> 01:28:23.800
<v Speaker 3>you haven't heard this one as well. So I like

1491
01:28:23.840 --> 01:28:25.880
<v Speaker 3>to like collect a few people and then and then

1492
01:28:25.920 --> 01:28:31.560
<v Speaker 3>do it. But honestly, honestly, no, I feel like the

1493
01:28:31.600 --> 01:28:32.600
<v Speaker 3>hard work pays off.

1494
01:28:35.039 --> 01:28:36.880
<v Speaker 2>It obviously does pay off.

1495
01:28:37.439 --> 01:28:40.079
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it has this advantage like doing a lot of

1496
01:28:40.159 --> 01:28:43.439
<v Speaker 4>dry runs that when you get to the stage, you

1497
01:28:43.479 --> 01:28:46.399
<v Speaker 4>feel like you did all the hard work. Like I said,

1498
01:28:46.439 --> 01:28:49.039
<v Speaker 4>it's like now the fun part we can because you've

1499
01:28:49.119 --> 01:28:51.640
<v Speaker 4>run this talk. You did the hard part of running

1500
01:28:51.640 --> 01:28:53.359
<v Speaker 4>it fixing, you're running it fixing run and now you

1501
01:28:53.439 --> 01:28:55.479
<v Speaker 4>just have to have go on stage and have fun,

1502
01:28:56.119 --> 01:28:57.600
<v Speaker 4>which is a great feeling.

1503
01:28:58.079 --> 01:29:02.119
<v Speaker 3>So runs are like tests. That's that's that's what I'll

1504
01:29:02.159 --> 01:29:05.479
<v Speaker 3>call it. Dragons are tests. It's like having a lot

1505
01:29:05.520 --> 01:29:09.359
<v Speaker 3>of tests.

1506
01:29:07.600 --> 01:29:11.119
<v Speaker 5>Like different because because I think I think that it's

1507
01:29:11.159 --> 01:29:15.199
<v Speaker 5>anchored in the in in my conversational style of my talks.

1508
01:29:15.920 --> 01:29:18.279
<v Speaker 5>I think that every time I give the same talk,

1509
01:29:18.720 --> 01:29:21.239
<v Speaker 5>it's it's a completely different talk, like it has the

1510
01:29:21.279 --> 01:29:25.479
<v Speaker 5>same bullet points maybe, but I give the different jokes.

1511
01:29:25.560 --> 01:29:28.840
<v Speaker 5>I I say different things, different sentences I come with

1512
01:29:29.640 --> 01:29:33.840
<v Speaker 5>sometimes even different takeaway because my talks are mostly conversational,

1513
01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:37.119
<v Speaker 5>so dry running it again and again takes away from

1514
01:29:37.239 --> 01:29:40.439
<v Speaker 5>the conversational style because I don't want to memorize my points.

1515
01:29:40.479 --> 01:29:43.119
<v Speaker 5>I don't want to be accurate about what I say.

1516
01:29:43.159 --> 01:29:45.239
<v Speaker 5>I just want to, I don't know, talk about what

1517
01:29:45.279 --> 01:29:48.479
<v Speaker 5>I feel like talking about today. And this works for

1518
01:29:48.640 --> 01:29:53.039
<v Speaker 5>me specifically in the style of talks that I usually.

1519
01:29:52.720 --> 01:29:55.199
<v Speaker 2>Give the first half of the talk as well.

1520
01:29:56.199 --> 01:29:59.840
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yes, so that's why I have just one sent

1521
01:30:00.199 --> 01:30:02.760
<v Speaker 5>on the screen and I don't know, and it's like

1522
01:30:02.800 --> 01:30:05.279
<v Speaker 5>for me, it's it's like a promptif I think about

1523
01:30:05.279 --> 01:30:10.119
<v Speaker 5>this one today. So this this is the way I

1524
01:30:10.159 --> 01:30:13.840
<v Speaker 5>prepare for my talks, just by not preparing much, just

1525
01:30:13.880 --> 01:30:18.399
<v Speaker 5>seeing that I have the overall understanding of time and

1526
01:30:18.439 --> 01:30:20.800
<v Speaker 5>that I can deliver it on time, that I know

1527
01:30:21.359 --> 01:30:25.439
<v Speaker 5>what I should do about my life coding, and if

1528
01:30:25.600 --> 01:30:28.640
<v Speaker 5>if everything else is all right, then yeah, I just

1529
01:30:28.680 --> 01:30:29.159
<v Speaker 5>go with it.

1530
01:30:29.840 --> 01:30:34.039
<v Speaker 1>I would just add though that this really changes with experience.

1531
01:30:34.640 --> 01:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>When when you're an experienced speaker, it's much much easier

1532
01:30:40.119 --> 01:30:43.319
<v Speaker 1>to just get up and talk about the topic. And

1533
01:30:43.359 --> 01:30:46.359
<v Speaker 1>when you're a new speaker, like anything, like anything, practice

1534
01:30:46.399 --> 01:30:50.079
<v Speaker 1>makes perfect. You're never perfect, at least we aren't, but

1535
01:30:50.920 --> 01:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>undoubtedly practice makes a significant difference.

1536
01:30:56.439 --> 01:30:59.119
<v Speaker 4>One point about timing, because that's the reason, one reason

1537
01:30:59.159 --> 01:31:02.279
<v Speaker 4>you do dry even if you don't memorize everything. I

1538
01:31:02.479 --> 01:31:04.319
<v Speaker 4>also don't like to memorize everything. You have to have

1539
01:31:04.439 --> 01:31:07.680
<v Speaker 4>endcores in the presentation, in the talk that you know, okay,

1540
01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:10.319
<v Speaker 4>after ten minutes, I should have gotten to this point

1541
01:31:10.560 --> 01:31:12.479
<v Speaker 4>and if I if I didn't, that means that I'm

1542
01:31:12.520 --> 01:31:15.159
<v Speaker 4>behind time or or ahead of time. So that's you

1543
01:31:15.159 --> 01:31:16.279
<v Speaker 4>have to have endcurse.

1544
01:31:16.239 --> 01:31:20.119
<v Speaker 1>In the interesting. I usually don't I look at the

1545
01:31:20.560 --> 01:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>talk holistically. I don't try to find the anchor points

1546
01:31:23.840 --> 01:31:30.319
<v Speaker 1>in the talk interesting. Okay, So the last comment anything

1547
01:31:30.359 --> 01:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about jokes, yes or no entertainment for size content, I

1548
01:31:34.720 --> 01:31:35.199
<v Speaker 1>would say.

1549
01:31:35.239 --> 01:31:39.079
<v Speaker 4>I would say that, I mean there should be a

1550
01:31:39.199 --> 01:31:43.159
<v Speaker 4>wow moment in the talk, like preferably two in the

1551
01:31:43.880 --> 01:31:47.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm very much on the side of entertainment. But if not,

1552
01:31:47.840 --> 01:31:49.840
<v Speaker 4>there should be a moment. I mean, the most fun

1553
01:31:49.880 --> 01:31:52.760
<v Speaker 4>part is when people like take out the cameras, like

1554
01:31:52.800 --> 01:31:55.800
<v Speaker 4>the more cameras and just taking pictures of the of

1555
01:31:55.880 --> 01:32:00.239
<v Speaker 4>the slide or writing things down. So those are things

1556
01:32:00.279 --> 01:32:03.640
<v Speaker 4>that should be even if it's a fully informative talk,

1557
01:32:03.760 --> 01:32:05.199
<v Speaker 4>I think, and it's.

1558
01:32:05.039 --> 01:32:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Not always possible though. I think sometimes talks are just informative.

1559
01:32:11.359 --> 01:32:12.199
<v Speaker 3>I not.

1560
01:32:13.199 --> 01:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know your talks, like you did this

1561
01:32:15.960 --> 01:32:19.159
<v Speaker 1>talk about putting three D objects in the real world,

1562
01:32:19.439 --> 01:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>like the ar talk. That's a very well talk. The

1563
01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>entire talk was a wow moment. People kept taking pictures.

1564
01:32:25.760 --> 01:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if I'm talking about a certain technical

1565
01:32:28.880 --> 01:32:32.479
<v Speaker 1>topic that's really like in like you kind of refer

1566
01:32:32.560 --> 01:32:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to it in the zeitgeist, then it's important and interesting

1567
01:32:35.199 --> 01:32:38.479
<v Speaker 1>and informative, But there is no wow.

1568
01:32:39.680 --> 01:32:39.880
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1569
01:32:40.399 --> 01:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I can stick an amusing thing into the side show,

1570
01:32:44.359 --> 01:32:46.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe I can't. What do I do about it?

1571
01:32:47.239 --> 01:32:50.600
<v Speaker 4>There's always a wow, even if it's a technological wow,

1572
01:32:50.600 --> 01:32:54.119
<v Speaker 4>even if it's like a huh wow.

1573
01:32:55.279 --> 01:32:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it doesn't have to be many a wow.

1574
01:32:58.239 --> 01:32:59.119
<v Speaker 1>It could be an h.

1575
01:33:00.760 --> 01:33:03.359
<v Speaker 5>Or Rica moment, but.

1576
01:33:03.359 --> 01:33:04.479
<v Speaker 2>It's not really the question.

1577
01:33:04.720 --> 01:33:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Like you you kind of asked about jokes, which I

1578
01:33:07.760 --> 01:33:14.039
<v Speaker 3>think are crucial because when people laugh they listen to

1579
01:33:14.079 --> 01:33:18.960
<v Speaker 3>you that creates engagement, Like jokes are actually necessary for engagement.

1580
01:33:19.760 --> 01:33:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I totally agree. It's also if you can find

1581
01:33:24.159 --> 01:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a funny slide that makes life even easier in that regard. So,

1582
01:33:28.800 --> 01:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, I in a particular talk that I gave

1583
01:33:31.760 --> 01:33:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a while back about web performance, I wanted to make

1584
01:33:37.159 --> 01:33:40.439
<v Speaker 1>a point that correlation and causation are not the same thing.

1585
01:33:41.279 --> 01:33:45.199
<v Speaker 1>So I found this amusing graph that shows a correlation

1586
01:33:46.079 --> 01:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>between the usage of Internet Explorer and murder rate in

1587
01:33:50.800 --> 01:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the USA, and showed that as one decrease, so did

1588
01:33:53.560 --> 01:33:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the other. And that was an amusing side to put

1589
01:33:58.199 --> 01:34:00.439
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, it saved me the trouble of

1590
01:34:00.479 --> 01:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>coming up with a natural joke. Uh. The important thing

1591
01:34:04.119 --> 01:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is you need to be amusing, but it's important to

1592
01:34:07.239 --> 01:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you guys, but I'm not a

1593
01:34:09.359 --> 01:34:14.199
<v Speaker 1>stand up comic, so don't try to have it all jokes.

1594
01:34:14.239 --> 01:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Don't try to be too funny unless unless you do

1595
01:34:17.960 --> 01:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>happen to be a comedian. I know some speak some

1596
01:34:20.560 --> 01:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>techt speakers who are I'm not.

1597
01:34:23.520 --> 01:34:27.439
<v Speaker 5>I think, at least for me, I think jokes are

1598
01:34:28.479 --> 01:34:31.399
<v Speaker 5>like an integral part of my talk. But I never

1599
01:34:31.600 --> 01:34:34.560
<v Speaker 5>know whether job jokes are going to be because they're

1600
01:34:34.640 --> 01:34:38.560
<v Speaker 5>not Like I don't do enough knock jokes in my talks.

1601
01:34:38.560 --> 01:34:42.359
<v Speaker 5>I don't prepare the funny parts in advents. I just

1602
01:34:42.479 --> 01:34:45.439
<v Speaker 5>it's part of the conversational style of the talks that

1603
01:34:45.600 --> 01:34:49.279
<v Speaker 5>I just come up with stuff as I go, depending

1604
01:34:49.279 --> 01:34:53.399
<v Speaker 5>on what the previous sentence was. And usually that's how

1605
01:34:53.439 --> 01:34:58.079
<v Speaker 5>it works for me. Talks end up with laughs and

1606
01:34:58.239 --> 01:35:01.319
<v Speaker 5>there and they they do end up being funny, usually

1607
01:35:01.840 --> 01:35:04.760
<v Speaker 5>even when it's a dry talk about I don't know CSS.

1608
01:35:06.239 --> 01:35:11.560
<v Speaker 5>But the thing that I know to planning what is

1609
01:35:11.600 --> 01:35:17.119
<v Speaker 5>funny is funny in a way, yes, really joke, but

1610
01:35:18.239 --> 01:35:20.399
<v Speaker 5>nothing nothing that I plan in advance. But I end

1611
01:35:20.520 --> 01:35:24.600
<v Speaker 5>up actually being even complimented on the humor in the

1612
01:35:24.640 --> 01:35:28.079
<v Speaker 5>talk that wasn't even planned to begin with. So that's uh,

1613
01:35:28.239 --> 01:35:30.039
<v Speaker 5>that's the way I do it. I just talk and

1614
01:35:30.720 --> 01:35:34.000
<v Speaker 5>find out the funny thing or sometimes even after I

1615
01:35:34.039 --> 01:35:36.960
<v Speaker 5>say it, I realized it was funny, mm hmm.

1616
01:35:37.920 --> 01:35:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Before we anything to add, before we finish, before we

1617
01:35:41.520 --> 01:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>wrap up, Uh, I have something, yeah, please do so.

1618
01:35:46.640 --> 01:35:51.159
<v Speaker 5>The one thing, and this is an important tip for

1619
01:35:51.159 --> 01:35:56.560
<v Speaker 5>for everybody speaking, because going on stage is super scary

1620
01:35:56.600 --> 01:35:59.680
<v Speaker 5>and it's it's frightening, and there's a lot going on,

1621
01:35:59.720 --> 01:36:03.640
<v Speaker 5>and it's easy to get a blackout. And when you

1622
01:36:03.760 --> 01:36:06.279
<v Speaker 5>do say something you don't intend to, or when you

1623
01:36:06.399 --> 01:36:09.720
<v Speaker 5>forget what you're going to say, it's easy to spiral

1624
01:36:09.840 --> 01:36:14.600
<v Speaker 5>down and just crash and have the entire talk or

1625
01:36:14.680 --> 01:36:19.319
<v Speaker 5>the entire resire talk just go to waste. And the

1626
01:36:19.399 --> 01:36:24.000
<v Speaker 5>one tape I found for good recover ability is realizing

1627
01:36:24.039 --> 01:36:26.680
<v Speaker 5>that the audience doesn't really know what you're going to say,

1628
01:36:26.680 --> 01:36:29.800
<v Speaker 5>they don't know the continuation of the talk, and just

1629
01:36:30.159 --> 01:36:34.600
<v Speaker 5>pause for a second, recollect, and continue with the next

1630
01:36:34.600 --> 01:36:36.800
<v Speaker 5>topic or whatever it is. And even if you made

1631
01:36:36.800 --> 01:36:39.520
<v Speaker 5>a mistake, you can either say, oh, that was incorrect

1632
01:36:39.640 --> 01:36:42.920
<v Speaker 5>and fix it. It's okay that you will, they will understand,

1633
01:36:43.159 --> 01:36:47.279
<v Speaker 5>or just skip ahead before it's fine. They don't know

1634
01:36:47.439 --> 01:36:48.520
<v Speaker 5>even what they missed.

1635
01:36:49.279 --> 01:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, go for it.

1636
01:36:52.159 --> 01:36:55.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would. I totally agree. And I would also

1637
01:36:55.279 --> 01:36:58.119
<v Speaker 4>say that it's important to remember that you and the

1638
01:36:58.159 --> 01:37:01.520
<v Speaker 4>audience you have the same goal. I mean, the audience

1639
01:37:01.760 --> 01:37:04.680
<v Speaker 4>came to be entertained or to be tolt or to

1640
01:37:04.720 --> 01:37:08.279
<v Speaker 4>be They don't come to grill you. Both of you

1641
01:37:08.800 --> 01:37:10.520
<v Speaker 4>want you to succeed, to be able to give this

1642
01:37:10.640 --> 01:37:13.840
<v Speaker 4>talk so it's easier if you think about it like that.

1643
01:37:13.880 --> 01:37:15.680
<v Speaker 4>It's easier if you think about it. Oh, they're gonna

1644
01:37:15.720 --> 01:37:17.800
<v Speaker 4>they're gonna have so much fun. They're gonna they're gonna

1645
01:37:17.840 --> 01:37:18.239
<v Speaker 4>enjoy it.

1646
01:37:18.439 --> 01:37:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with what you said. So the final

1647
01:37:20.520 --> 01:37:24.439
<v Speaker 1>thing before I let you all go two things. Actually,

1648
01:37:24.840 --> 01:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>One is to give your contact information if people want

1649
01:37:29.439 --> 01:37:31.399
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with you, talk to you about

1650
01:37:32.079 --> 01:37:36.760
<v Speaker 1>speak possible speaking engagement or ideas or whatever. And also

1651
01:37:36.920 --> 01:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>if you can name one of your favorite conferences or

1652
01:37:41.600 --> 01:37:46.479
<v Speaker 1>one or two that throughout the years for whatever reason,

1653
01:37:48.600 --> 01:37:55.399
<v Speaker 1>or alternatively your least favorite conference for whatever reason. So

1654
01:37:55.520 --> 01:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>who wants to go first?

1655
01:37:58.439 --> 01:38:02.680
<v Speaker 5>I will not rank them, because that's not that's not

1656
01:38:03.079 --> 01:38:05.119
<v Speaker 5>a nice thing to do, but I will say I

1657
01:38:05.119 --> 01:38:09.079
<v Speaker 5>will nominate one that was a noteworthy and this is

1658
01:38:09.119 --> 01:38:11.880
<v Speaker 5>one that Ariel and I went to last year in

1659
01:38:12.039 --> 01:38:15.760
<v Speaker 5>Hamburg and lead went there as as a conference goer,

1660
01:38:16.079 --> 01:38:22.079
<v Speaker 5>as an audience and one yes Ariel's plus one, and

1661
01:38:23.399 --> 01:38:27.359
<v Speaker 5>we went to KO Talks in Hamburg and that was

1662
01:38:27.399 --> 01:38:30.159
<v Speaker 5>that was fine. It was a really good conference, good

1663
01:38:30.199 --> 01:38:32.079
<v Speaker 5>party I heard. I didn't go to the party. I

1664
01:38:32.119 --> 01:38:34.079
<v Speaker 5>had to fly to the other conference on the same night.

1665
01:38:34.640 --> 01:38:39.600
<v Speaker 5>But Alongside that conference, there was a huge furry convention.

1666
01:38:40.760 --> 01:38:46.279
<v Speaker 5>So three thousand engineers, five thousand fairies. You cannot make

1667
01:38:46.319 --> 01:38:48.000
<v Speaker 5>this up. You cannot make this up.

1668
01:38:48.039 --> 01:38:48.600
<v Speaker 3>It was, it was.

1669
01:38:48.800 --> 01:38:49.760
<v Speaker 5>It was brilliant.

1670
01:38:51.920 --> 01:38:53.399
<v Speaker 2>They were laughing. I was scared.

1671
01:38:55.880 --> 01:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, you weren't wearing a costume, That's what it was. Okay.

1672
01:39:06.840 --> 01:39:10.279
<v Speaker 4>I can say that if someone who's listening is in

1673
01:39:10.319 --> 01:39:14.720
<v Speaker 4>the front end of JavaScript word React Something and Jazz Nation,

1674
01:39:15.359 --> 01:39:19.960
<v Speaker 4>those are two conferences that are very speaker friendly and

1675
01:39:20.399 --> 01:39:23.319
<v Speaker 4>they like to give really good experience. They're back to

1676
01:39:23.399 --> 01:39:27.359
<v Speaker 4>back one day React Something and afterwards.

1677
01:39:27.119 --> 01:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Jazz Nation and it's Amsterdam and it's Answer.

1678
01:39:31.039 --> 01:39:33.319
<v Speaker 4>Them, and they have the best speakers, like they have

1679
01:39:33.399 --> 01:39:37.000
<v Speaker 4>new speakers, but also the best speakers from the JavaScript community.

1680
01:39:37.319 --> 01:39:41.600
<v Speaker 4>So I truly recommend to always trying to submit to them.

1681
01:39:41.920 --> 01:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The only downside with jazz Nation is that you

1682
01:39:46.119 --> 01:39:49.479
<v Speaker 1>until fairly late in the process you don't know whether

1683
01:39:49.560 --> 01:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you'll be invited to speak in person or online, which

1684
01:39:52.880 --> 01:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is a bummer. You submit, you get accepted, and then

1685
01:39:59.319 --> 01:40:01.279
<v Speaker 1>two weeks before the conference they tell you, yeah, but

1686
01:40:01.319 --> 01:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be online. Well two weeks probably, I

1687
01:40:04.520 --> 01:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think it was that not two weeks, but a

1688
01:40:07.600 --> 01:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>month or two before the conference they tell you it's

1689
01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:12.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be online rather than in person, which is

1690
01:40:12.399 --> 01:40:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a bummer. And how about you area.

1691
01:40:17.279 --> 01:40:21.920
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to speak next month in web Expo

1692
01:40:22.039 --> 01:40:24.840
<v Speaker 3>and drug I haven't been to the conference yet, but

1693
01:40:24.960 --> 01:40:28.439
<v Speaker 3>just so far from from the organization, I have to

1694
01:40:28.520 --> 01:40:35.399
<v Speaker 3>say that I'm in awe. Also on the web Expo,

1695
01:40:37.359 --> 01:40:38.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to speak.

1696
01:40:38.199 --> 01:40:41.640
<v Speaker 2>It's my first time attending to ab Expo conference.

1697
01:40:42.079 --> 01:40:45.960
<v Speaker 3>But the organizers have had like one on one with

1698
01:40:46.199 --> 01:40:48.600
<v Speaker 3>each and every one of the speakers. They group the

1699
01:40:48.640 --> 01:40:51.680
<v Speaker 3>speakers to to do dry runs and feedback to each others.

1700
01:40:51.920 --> 01:40:55.159
<v Speaker 3>You have like two full days of fun just for

1701
01:40:55.199 --> 01:40:59.079
<v Speaker 3>the speakers before the conference. Like they have like children

1702
01:40:59.159 --> 01:41:02.199
<v Speaker 3>activity in the conference, so people that have kids, can

1703
01:41:02.239 --> 01:41:04.239
<v Speaker 3>I come and enjoy it the full day. Like they

1704
01:41:04.279 --> 01:41:09.239
<v Speaker 3>really give such attend They give attention to every small detail.

1705
01:41:09.439 --> 01:41:13.319
<v Speaker 2>And I've yet to see such such.

1706
01:41:13.079 --> 01:41:17.399
<v Speaker 3>An organization that goes down to these levels. So I'm

1707
01:41:17.520 --> 01:41:20.039
<v Speaker 3>very excited to see how how would that how would

1708
01:41:20.079 --> 01:41:21.079
<v Speaker 3>WebEx booth feel like?

1709
01:41:21.560 --> 01:41:23.399
<v Speaker 2>I will let you guys know next month.

1710
01:41:23.680 --> 01:41:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I really speaking about conferences, I like I really liked

1711
01:41:28.159 --> 01:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the various JS conferences. I spoke at a couple and

1712
01:41:31.279 --> 01:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>they were always very well organized and also very top

1713
01:41:34.319 --> 01:41:38.119
<v Speaker 1>note speakers and the people who are running it were

1714
01:41:38.239 --> 01:41:44.319
<v Speaker 1>very attentive to detail and very friendly. Also, i'll give

1715
01:41:44.359 --> 01:41:48.159
<v Speaker 1>to you another one is unfortunately on hiatus. I think

1716
01:41:48.239 --> 01:41:52.119
<v Speaker 1>it was Front and Zurich, which was also very well organized,

1717
01:41:52.239 --> 01:41:55.479
<v Speaker 1>very friendly, and gave a stipend to every speaker, which

1718
01:41:55.520 --> 01:41:58.760
<v Speaker 1>was unexpected. They say, hey, now take this money, which

1719
01:41:58.800 --> 01:42:01.920
<v Speaker 1>was really nice of them to do. And also this

1720
01:42:02.119 --> 01:42:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a conference which is no longer active. I mentioned O'Riley Fluent,

1721
01:42:08.560 --> 01:42:12.199
<v Speaker 1>so I was actually supposed at one Riley Fluent. I

1722
01:42:12.279 --> 01:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gave a workshop. So you know, you think, hey, I'm

1723
01:42:15.520 --> 01:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>going to give a workshop. How many people will participate

1724
01:42:18.359 --> 01:42:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in a workshop? Ten people, twenty people? Can you guess

1725
01:42:22.920 --> 01:42:24.720
<v Speaker 1>how many people were in my workshop?

1726
01:42:25.520 --> 01:42:32.039
<v Speaker 2>Oh? No, oh, no, fifty?

1727
01:42:32.039 --> 01:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Over two hundred in a workshop.

1728
01:42:35.640 --> 01:42:38.079
<v Speaker 2>In a workshop, in a workshop.

1729
01:42:39.800 --> 01:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, giving a workshop for two hundred and something people.

1730
01:42:44.119 --> 01:42:52.479
<v Speaker 1>That was interesting anyway, sounds I actually worked out in

1731
01:42:52.520 --> 01:42:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the end, But they were lucky because my workshop was

1732
01:42:55.359 --> 01:42:58.039
<v Speaker 1>structured in such a way that I basically the whole

1733
01:42:58.079 --> 01:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>concept was people opening the chrome dev tools and writing

1734
01:43:02.319 --> 01:43:05.439
<v Speaker 1>things into the console. So that's something I could do

1735
01:43:06.159 --> 01:43:08.319
<v Speaker 1>to a large group of people. If it had been

1736
01:43:08.399 --> 01:43:10.760
<v Speaker 1>something like do this and that and vis code and

1737
01:43:10.800 --> 01:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>get and I don't know what, that would never have flown.

1738
01:43:14.239 --> 01:43:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1739
01:43:14.920 --> 01:43:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of shocked. I walked into this huge

1740
01:43:18.680 --> 01:43:22.840
<v Speaker 1>auditorium and they were like a huge number of people.

1741
01:43:23.079 --> 01:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the workshop anyway. Yeah, it was really weird. Anyway,

1742
01:43:28.239 --> 01:43:31.199
<v Speaker 1>thank you. So you forgot to give your contact information?

1743
01:43:31.840 --> 01:43:35.239
<v Speaker 1>How do people reach out in contact you? Accept real

1744
01:43:35.439 --> 01:43:37.359
<v Speaker 1>for some reason doesn't want to be contacted.

1745
01:43:37.479 --> 01:43:41.640
<v Speaker 3>You can contact me truly and just rightly, and on Twitter.

1746
01:43:45.880 --> 01:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>So you're LinkedIn though, right I have LinkedIn?

1747
01:43:50.840 --> 01:43:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah for now, so for me obviously, you can

1748
01:43:57.119 --> 01:44:00.399
<v Speaker 4>always DM on Twitter. It's lead yousef on Twitter and

1749
01:44:00.680 --> 01:44:06.359
<v Speaker 4>LinkedIn and feel free to ask questions, give comments anythink

1750
01:44:06.479 --> 01:44:06.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm open?

1751
01:44:07.600 --> 01:44:10.359
<v Speaker 5>How about you of your tell Yeah, I'm not very

1752
01:44:10.439 --> 01:44:13.159
<v Speaker 5>active on Twitter. You can already you can always find

1753
01:44:13.199 --> 01:44:16.560
<v Speaker 5>me there, but I'm not very active. It's abitar l

1754
01:44:16.880 --> 01:44:20.079
<v Speaker 5>e v y A t A r E L. And

1755
01:44:20.199 --> 01:44:22.920
<v Speaker 5>the rest of my contact details are on my website

1756
01:44:23.279 --> 01:44:26.279
<v Speaker 5>elus dot com, so e A l U s h

1757
01:44:26.359 --> 01:44:29.199
<v Speaker 5>dot com. Most of it is there, I think.

1758
01:44:29.800 --> 01:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, guys, thank you very much for participating. I think

1759
01:44:32.560 --> 01:44:37.079
<v Speaker 1>this was really interesting and more importantly informative, like we

1760
01:44:37.239 --> 01:44:40.720
<v Speaker 1>like our conference talks to be. So thank you all,

1761
01:44:41.399 --> 01:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and thank you to our audience for listening in. And

1762
01:44:45.439 --> 01:44:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Bye bye bye, thank you,
