Speaker 1: Hm.
Speaker 2: Welcome to the Typical Skeptic Patches where we dive, you
Speaker 2: decide your questioning the matrix from you wear phones with
Speaker 2: the shadows and one besides oversides overside rock Cahalil got
Speaker 2: some myths like ghosts in the night, Norman pros in
Speaker 2: secret space size sEH, we keep it real. No frighten,
Speaker 2: no fright no hero Ancis style the mouse h h
Speaker 2: sepeak Snapple, We just man those fablemen. Last targets, soul
Speaker 2: streaking out of disturble, doarment hall for coluge, cry in
Speaker 2: the midst in reality you can't resistant twist, soul trapped, snapping,
Speaker 2: breathing condition mapping, dreams and their divisions, out of body missions,
Speaker 2: waking up the teams, no sense of shrip f're no
Speaker 2: release schemes to sup're for see kings bringing veils here
Speaker 2: to freedom, ring.
Speaker 1: Break. Welcome to Typical Skeptic Podcast.
Speaker 2: Be sure to like, subscribe and turn on notifications. Yeah, hey, guys,
Speaker 2: welcome back to another episode of the Typical Skeptic Podcast.
Speaker 2: I can't believe we're up to episode twenty seven sixty.
Speaker 2: And then my guest today he's been on my show,
Speaker 2: actually two or three times before, but like it was
Speaker 2: on my old channel, and I remind me they forgot
Speaker 2: to tell Freddy that. But like, my old channel got
Speaker 2: taken down and we're rebuilding a new one. But we've
Speaker 2: already been able to rebuild pretty good so far. But anyway,
Speaker 2: my guest is best selling author, researcher and filmmaker Freddie Silva.
Speaker 2: He returns the typical skeptic for a deep investigation in
Speaker 2: new his newest documentary, Megalith. More than one hundred thousand
Speaker 2: megaliths once covered in the French region of Brittany, creating
Speaker 2: what Freddy describes as the world's largest magolistic metropolis. Similar
Speaker 2: monuments across Portugal, Scotland and southern England. But why were
Speaker 2: these locations selected? And how are these stones, reaching sixty
Speaker 2: feet tall transported as far as forty miles. Freddy's investigation
Speaker 2: and covers remarkable connections involving identical megalithic designs and construction methods,
Speaker 2: selective stones transported across transported across enormous distances, gravity anomalies
Speaker 2: and geological fault lines, electricmagnetic energy surrounding sacred altered states
Speaker 2: of consciousness, ancient legends of gods arriving from the sea,
Speaker 2: migrations originating from the Black Sea. A mysterious language is
Speaker 2: a connection to our media and the possible identity of
Speaker 2: the original master builders. Where these monuments primitive ceremonial structures
Speaker 2: or pieces of advanced technology designed to interact with Earth
Speaker 2: and influence human consciousness. Freddie Wallser connected discoveries of the
Speaker 2: Megalot with his previous research into the Shining Ones, ancient giants,
Speaker 2: the Calleu Stages, and the lords of Anu, pre flood
Speaker 2: civilizations and the survivors who helped rebuild humanity following a
Speaker 2: global taxery approximately twenty thousand years ago, twelve thousand years ago.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, and it's going to be an amazing conversation
Speaker 2: and I'm bringing him to the stage now. And yeah, Freddie,
Speaker 2: thanks so much for coming back.
Speaker 1: On How are you hello? Rob? Hey, he'd like the
Speaker 1: new music the thanks. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I kind of rebranded my like I got my first
Speaker 2: YouTube channel taken down. I put a lot of so
Speaker 2: I got up to twenty thousand followers on that channel
Speaker 2: and then it got taken down. Then I started a
Speaker 2: new channel. I have eight thousand on this one. And
Speaker 2: then but I started on Rumble two, so I have
Speaker 2: like six thousand on Rumble two and then on the
Speaker 2: audio podcast. So I kind of spread myself out all
Speaker 2: over the place once when I got taken down, you know,
Speaker 2: oh for you, yeah, yeah, but how are you? It
Speaker 2: seems like you're you're really connecting the dots on ancient
Speaker 2: history and putting some things together.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I've been doing this for thirty years,
Speaker 1: and I've been talking talking to large upright rocks for
Speaker 1: along the portion of that time, trying to work out
Speaker 1: what our ancestors were up to when they were moving
Speaker 1: these enormous rocks across the landscape and why they've putting
Speaker 1: them where they were for what purpose? And it's taking
Speaker 1: that long to sort of collect data experiences, and now
Speaker 1: scientists coming in and there seems a bigger pictures now
Speaker 1: coming together because if we take a look at the
Speaker 1: three biggest concentrations of megalifts and the planet, which is
Speaker 1: the Karnak region in Brittany, Central Portugal, and also incredibly
Speaker 1: is it might say Northern Scotland, the islands around the
Speaker 1: northern coast of Scotland. They have a huge disproportion of
Speaker 1: megalithic sites. I mean Orkney alone has three thousand on
Speaker 1: his tiny little archipelago, and it makes you wonder why
Speaker 1: why are these places chosen? What was the underlying mechanism
Speaker 1: is there's something in common, and now we are beginning
Speaker 1: to realize there are commonalities and points in common. They
Speaker 1: seem to have been utilizing the Earth's geology and its
Speaker 1: systems of energy, so we finally begin to realize why
Speaker 1: people are experiencing unusual sensations around them. People are out
Speaker 1: there are folklore also sitting with altered states initiation, but
Speaker 1: also with fairy folk and l folk and of course
Speaker 1: shining people. So it's all coming together nicely. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's been a patient exercise, so I'm glad it's finally
Speaker 1: sort of coming together.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's start up with this, like the people who
Speaker 2: made the megalists, or who we think might have made
Speaker 2: the may list. Do you believe it chases back the
Speaker 2: shining ones?
Speaker 1: Oh? Absolutely, because the progenitors of the all the European megaliths.
Speaker 1: If you follow the DNA and the migration trail, it
Speaker 1: starts around the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, so
Speaker 1: it'll be Siberia Ukraine today, and that they moved around
Speaker 1: six thousand BC because of wait for it, climate change,
Speaker 1: so nothing new there, and that they led the names
Speaker 1: to most of the stone circles, the standing stones of
Speaker 1: Europe because the underlying language is the Armenian. And now
Speaker 1: that we understand that, we can make a connection. And
Speaker 1: if you keep bringing that story back all the way
Speaker 1: down to what is today Armenia, or what's left of it,
Speaker 1: it used to be the northern border of Egypt at
Speaker 1: one point and that's how big that country was. Today
Speaker 1: is shrunk down to an area the size of Massachusetts.
Speaker 1: So it's pretty sad. But if you go up into
Speaker 1: the highlands up there, you'll see the precursors of many
Speaker 1: of the semples that we find in northern Scotland. For example, Calanche,
Speaker 1: the precursor of Kalanish, is actually in the Armene Highlands
Speaker 1: and it's close to twenty six thousand years old based
Speaker 1: on the erosion of the stone. Also the alignments that
Speaker 1: you provide, because the sites are all related to the sky,
Speaker 1: a certain event, a constellation, a specific star that was
Speaker 1: prominent in the heaven at the time, and it's called
Speaker 1: the practice of archaeo astronomy, and it happens all around
Speaker 1: the planet, and once you understand what they were looking at,
Speaker 1: which requires the understanding of folklore, you can then start
Speaker 1: figuring out using computation what was the templar ligne too,
Speaker 1: and that gives you a pretty good date around that region.
Speaker 1: We have stories about the Anu, the people of Anu
Speaker 1: also called the Anunnaki, and not the bad people that
Speaker 1: they made out of me. By the way. They're much
Speaker 1: more interesting than all the nonsense that's out there on
Speaker 1: social media. And these people were associated with astronomy, they
Speaker 1: were associated with a megalithic building and their nickname the
Speaker 1: Shining Ones, and the people of the Serpents are also
Speaker 1: found throughout France, Portugal and Scotland. So you just put
Speaker 1: one on one together and realize that the migration pattern
Speaker 1: actually does go in those directions and what we see
Speaker 1: today are essentially the extension of their culture.
Speaker 2: That's amazing. Yeah, who were these people?
Speaker 1: Like?
Speaker 2: Would you? I know when me and you and I
Speaker 2: talked before I listened to one of our last podcasts,
Speaker 2: like it seemed like they were like human but not
Speaker 2: really human, and they had shiny skin and they would
Speaker 2: put like oil on they would like annoying oil on
Speaker 2: their skin. Like, have you come to any conclusion, And
Speaker 2: I know that you and I have also talked about
Speaker 2: from remembering now our past conversations. We talked about that
Speaker 2: they possibly built like a ladder to heaven or a
Speaker 2: Ryan or somewhere from what I think, so rightly.
Speaker 1: Connected with the Ryan. According to just about every single
Speaker 1: ancient people on the planet. They even in Polynesia they
Speaker 1: have that they call them the Uruku, the which call
Speaker 1: it basically the red people or the red haired people,
Speaker 1: because they had red hair or blonde hair and the
Speaker 1: lightness of their skin. The Sumerians called them. They were
Speaker 1: human like, but not quite human, so we were comfortable
Speaker 1: with them. You're just much taller than us, and I'm
Speaker 1: six foot five, and I could look up to them
Speaker 1: because they're about eight and a half feet tall. And
Speaker 1: we had orphans in the giants graves in France and
Speaker 1: also in Britain and also in Ireland. That's why they
Speaker 1: call giants graves and the skeletons whenever anybody can document
Speaker 1: them before they disappear, which they do. Eight and half
Speaker 1: feet tall us about the right height, so we don't
Speaker 1: know where they came from. In fact, i'm ironically, I'm
Speaker 1: actually going back through the books of Enoch, which is
Speaker 1: not his real name, by the way, His real name
Speaker 1: was Anu. He was actually ascribe and he was part
Speaker 1: of the Anunnaki council and the other ontime I'm looking
Speaker 1: at as the original Sumi stories of the flood and
Speaker 1: what happened before the flood, because this is the period
Speaker 1: we're dealing with, around nine thousand, seven hundred BC. And
Speaker 1: I'm also struggling with this because there's not much information
Speaker 1: left over. What we know is that there were a
Speaker 1: parallel culture that lived here on Earth beside us, but
Speaker 1: yet separate from us. They didn't want to prejudice this
Speaker 1: a direction in which well, back then it was chrome
Speaker 1: magnon man. That's the point where humans that we know
Speaker 1: that there's homo erectus erectus came from. And there's a
Speaker 1: sort of subtler understanding in the Sumerian books that we
Speaker 1: as humans today are a kind of hybridization of the
Speaker 1: chrome magnon gene interspersed with some an Unnucky blood. So
Speaker 1: this is where because and this is where it gets
Speaker 1: a little bit confused, they created us in order to
Speaker 1: take over some of the labor work that they were
Speaker 1: doing in the middle of the Armenian Highlands and all
Speaker 1: the way into the Middle East. So I guess they
Speaker 1: like working as much as we do. But then they
Speaker 1: left it up to us to get on with our
Speaker 1: own lives, and they're developing our own manner. The question
Speaker 1: is whether they come from We just don't know. It
Speaker 1: seems like they were here for already hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of years. The connection with the Ryan that I hear
Speaker 1: all the way over to Japan, Polynesia, even in South
Speaker 1: America suggests that at one point they came from O Ryan.
Speaker 1: Whether by spaceship, whether by actual travel, you can basically
Speaker 1: go on a hypothesis. But from what I hear is
Speaker 1: that at one time that those people moved here to Earth,
Speaker 1: lived here for a huge amount of time, and by
Speaker 1: the time that humans are beginning to get their act
Speaker 1: together as hunt together, as they are going already on
Speaker 1: a downslope, it's the end of their civilization and that
Speaker 1: we are now on the upswing. So this is around
Speaker 1: eight and a half thousand BC when they gave us
Speaker 1: all the accouterments of civilization that we have today. For
Speaker 1: better for work, I had to say that we have
Speaker 1: done some stupid things with the information that we're giving.
Speaker 1: We're given to the culture, mathematics, understanding of the stars,
Speaker 1: how does sail across oceans? And as always it starts
Speaker 1: off very well, but humans have this wonderful tendency to
Speaker 1: corrupt everything. So but we do modicum gratitude for leaving
Speaker 1: us behind the understanding of you know, how to measure
Speaker 1: the time, how to build megalithic structures, how to move
Speaker 1: the energy currents of the earth, the mathematics, the hybridization
Speaker 1: of crops, and also the domestication of cattle. These are
Speaker 1: all essentials, including writing for the foundation of civilization. But
Speaker 1: again I'm still struggling to to find more information as
Speaker 1: to what they were they doing here on Earth. Were
Speaker 1: they here by accident? Was it deliberate, But certainly they
Speaker 1: didn't want to hang out with us unless they saw
Speaker 1: things going in the very wrong direction. And then the
Speaker 1: messengers between them and us called the watchers, because they
Speaker 1: can only watch, they can't interact with us. They were
Speaker 1: slowly dripped feed hunter gatherers information about how to make
Speaker 1: your life better, and then they go and disappear into
Speaker 1: the island homes or their mountain homes. So they live
Speaker 1: very much aside from the human race. They are fair
Speaker 1: fascinating group. But the more I go around the world
Speaker 1: listening to indigenous people and how they describe them, and
Speaker 1: they describe them by different names, which is why it's
Speaker 1: taking soul of the figure out they're the same people.
Speaker 1: So the Vita Koshas of South America turned out to
Speaker 1: be the Anaki of the region in the northern Middle East,
Speaker 1: because they just call them by a completely different name
Speaker 1: called Haihaiwa Punti. But unless you know I'mara, you won't
Speaker 1: know that that means the shining people, and that was
Speaker 1: the nickname of the Ananaky over in the Armenia.
Speaker 2: Well do you think that story from the Bible connects?
Speaker 2: I know Matthew Will probably talked about it, where it's
Speaker 2: like Yahweh's telling the Israelites to go out and like
Speaker 2: destroy the people of a Knock or something, and he
Speaker 2: sends them out and you find out that they're going
Speaker 2: after King Ogen. Supposedly King Ogg's a giant, he has
Speaker 2: like a thirteen foot iron. Have you heard this? I
Speaker 2: only know a little bit about it. Do you think
Speaker 2: there's some truth to that?
Speaker 1: Not really, because what's happened is you're going to put
Speaker 1: this into context of the period where we have the
Speaker 1: Hebrew or the Hebrew who were a nomadic tribe that
Speaker 1: would go from place to place to place becoming jealous.
Speaker 1: And this is not a personal opinion, this is an
Speaker 1: actual observation of life. They were getting from the place
Speaker 1: getting jealous that people had settled down. For example, the
Speaker 1: Canaanites have found a place to settled down, the Babylonians
Speaker 1: have settled down, the Submirans are settled down, and they
Speaker 1: borrowed the stories from the Babylonians, which they only get
Speaker 1: through here say so, which is why the Old Testament
Speaker 1: makes absolutely no sense because it's all chopped up and
Speaker 1: clipped up, and a lot of this old information was
Speaker 1: also said with abstractly in symbol or metaphor in order
Speaker 1: to prevent people from abusing the stories. So what we
Speaker 1: get in the Bible is a totally biased Hebrew and
Speaker 1: Jewish point of view, because they wanted to present themselves
Speaker 1: with a book that made them which given legitimate, which
Speaker 1: they had anyway, because they're alive. If you're a live
Speaker 1: you're of legitimate human being. But they felt, in order
Speaker 1: to be superior to the Babylonians that they changed the
Speaker 1: stories to make everything in the Bible seem like it
Speaker 1: was adopted from the Hebrew culture, which it wasn't. It's
Speaker 1: borrowed from the Babylonian culture. But here's a funny thing,
Speaker 1: humans being humans. Of course, the Babylonians had stolen their
Speaker 1: information from what their concept of the Bible is from
Speaker 1: the Sumerians and changed all the stories, changed all the
Speaker 1: wonderful gods into barbaric, evil like people because the Babylonians
Speaker 1: were better than everybody else. So you see, it's the
Speaker 1: pot calling the kettle black. You know, we're just going
Speaker 1: to rip off somebody else make ourselves better, and then
Speaker 1: someone else comes along and changes what already is a
Speaker 1: corrupted story to begin with. So as a researcher, I
Speaker 1: have to go back to the original text, which is
Speaker 1: the Sumerian text, and if you read what's in there,
Speaker 1: the story is already five thousand years old by the
Speaker 1: time the Sumerians are writing about it, and the underlying
Speaker 1: language of Sumiri is Armenian. So now you have to
Speaker 1: go back to Armenia to find out where all this
Speaker 1: stuff came from. And there's a lot of information that's missing.
Speaker 1: So that's my job at the moment to try and
Speaker 1: pieche that story together.
Speaker 2: Yeah, do you think we can trust the original text
Speaker 2: of the otrahesis and the innumea list? Like I know
Speaker 2: other people think those are pretty important. What do you
Speaker 2: think about those original writings? Now, I'm not talking about
Speaker 2: like the Zacharai sitch Ands. I'm talking about like maybe
Speaker 2: earlier translations from like you know, like people like George
Speaker 2: Smith Relier.
Speaker 1: Because the problem with Sumerian and other dead languages is
Speaker 1: that there are subtleties in the language. It's a bit
Speaker 1: like in English you have affluence and affluence. They're close,
Speaker 1: but they mean completely different things. So if you just
Speaker 1: misread the accent on the on a Sumerian word a
Speaker 1: little bit differently, you get a completely different meaning. And
Speaker 1: I was going back to the books of Christian O'Brien,
Speaker 1: who wrote two fantastic books which are really hard to
Speaker 1: find in England about the Shining Ones, the Aanaki and
Speaker 1: the stories of the Garden of Eden. And he made
Speaker 1: a very very good point. He passed away about twenty
Speaker 1: years ago, and I've got these two numous books which
Speaker 1: are bloody expensive in my library. But it makes a
Speaker 1: very good point that you have to actually read the
Speaker 1: context of the translation. Most of it was done during
Speaker 1: the Victorian era, which had a very Catholic slant to it,
Speaker 1: So you have to take away the Catholic slant and
Speaker 1: put the story in the words in context of what
Speaker 1: was happening. And he actually makes a much better translation.
Speaker 1: It's not far off from what we have, but it
Speaker 1: makes a lot more sense because it's practical, it's understandable,
Speaker 1: and it's logical.
Speaker 2: What is it different do you think?
Speaker 1: Oh, for example, one of my favorites says the Serpent
Speaker 1: of the Garden of Eden. Yeah, complete nonsense, because by
Speaker 1: the time the Hebrews distorted the story, they had no
Speaker 1: idea about the people of the serpent. They literally thought
Speaker 1: that the devil was evil. Well, Lucifer was the lie betterer.
Speaker 1: He was the person who creates obstacles. A satan in
Speaker 1: the Arabic language actually means someone who provides an obstacle,
Speaker 1: and the obstacle is to force us to be confronted
Speaker 1: with a situation that allows you, given your God given brain,
Speaker 1: to overcome the situation and it makes you a better person.
Speaker 1: So a satan is actually a very useful person even
Speaker 1: in daily life. We get Satan's at the bank, we
Speaker 1: get Satan's in the police, we get Satans everywhere to
Speaker 1: challenge us or to confront our perception so that we
Speaker 1: can alter our perception of what's really happening, so we
Speaker 1: can choose a better course forward. And the same thing
Speaker 1: with the Garden of even with the serpent, I mean
Speaker 1: the fact that you have a serpent speaking to a
Speaker 1: human being that should rouse your suspicion right up there.
Speaker 1: I mean, snakes don't talk for a period. Even as
Speaker 1: a metaphor, it doesn't make sense. So if you go
Speaker 1: back to the original story in Sumeria, it becomes much
Speaker 1: easier to understand Ninlil, who was basically the wife of Enki,
Speaker 1: who is the very supportive god of humans from the
Speaker 1: Young Naki. They're basically trying to create this garden or
Speaker 1: an enclosure, which is much more accurate in a place
Speaker 1: called edin, which means a cultivatable plane, so it could
Speaker 1: have been somewhere north in Mesopotamia. As far as we know.
Speaker 1: They're trying to build this horticultural center to grow vegetables
Speaker 1: and grow enough crop and food to feed the growing
Speaker 1: population of the Watchers and the anarchy they had their
Speaker 1: own compound, and when they had the humans in there,
Speaker 1: they said, look, if you actually eat of this tree,
Speaker 1: there's something that happens to you where you suddenly become
Speaker 1: much more understanding of the mysteries of life. That's why
Speaker 1: it's called the Tree of Knife or the Tree of Knowledge.
Speaker 1: It's almost like it's kind of a drug. It looks
Speaker 1: like a pine cone sometimes. I think it's a part
Speaker 1: of the pomegranite family as far as I've been able
Speaker 1: to figure out, and it is a kind of a
Speaker 1: hallucinogenic drug, so kind of like we do Ayahuaska today.
Speaker 1: That's essentially what it does. It liberates your brain and
Speaker 1: allows you to actual travel to understand the world. So
Speaker 1: her nickname Tabayet, her nickname was a serpent person, so
Speaker 1: that was their nickname of the gods in the ancient
Speaker 1: cultures there. If you understood the laws of nature, which
Speaker 1: basically are electricity and magnetism, which flow like two serpents
Speaker 1: along the landscape that you don't see but you can sense,
Speaker 1: and basically you become a person of the serpent. That's
Speaker 1: what the actual title means. And you see it all
Speaker 1: around the world. So it's had nothing to do with snakes,
Speaker 1: has enough to do with reptiles or evil people. It's
Speaker 1: just your title of the people to whom you happen
Speaker 1: to belong. So you see how over two different cultures,
Speaker 1: the story of this interesting person is trying to teach
Speaker 1: humans how do we better people suddenly becomes corrupted into
Speaker 1: something completely evil.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's fascinating, and this ties into your new documentary
Speaker 2: megal Lit and someone to get into your next like,
Speaker 2: why do you think these beings were making these megalists?
Speaker 2: Do we have any real so do we have any
Speaker 2: close to what the what what their goals were or
Speaker 2: anything like that.
Speaker 1: I'm beginning to figure it out, and I think I've
Speaker 1: I'm halfway there. This is after twenty five years of
Speaker 1: research with this stuff. Because you're going to reloan geography,
Speaker 1: you have to loan geology science also electrical engineers, believe
Speaker 1: it or not, climate. You have to bring all of
Speaker 1: these things together to get a bigger picture. And the
Speaker 1: picture that's beginning to come together is that the reason
Speaker 1: why they were big clusters offs is a because they
Speaker 1: were choosing areas that are very high in pho electric activity.
Speaker 1: So the geology of the land, like let's say Karnak,
Speaker 1: for example, which is the west coast of Brittany biggest
Speaker 1: concentration of megaliphs. At the end of the last century,
Speaker 1: it was calculated there was as many as fifty monuments
Speaker 1: per square mile. It's like a forest of trick or stone.
Speaker 1: It was incredible. It still is today, despite the fact
Speaker 1: that eighty thousand of them have been removed, and there's
Speaker 1: still enough left to make it go wow. So well,
Speaker 1: they happen to occupy a high area of granite, which
Speaker 1: is highly PhD electricates, full of quartz, and underneath that
Speaker 1: you've got massive deposits of iron, so the whole thing
Speaker 1: is very electromagnetically active. It's also suspiciously attracted to lightning,
Speaker 1: which is why there's so many folklore saying do not
Speaker 1: go into the dolmens when there's a storm because you
Speaker 1: might get hit by lightning, And sure enough you do.
Speaker 1: I was in Portugal last year of filming for the documentary,
Speaker 1: and the tree next to one of my favorite dolmens,
Speaker 1: which I was filmed beautifully, came back three months like
Speaker 1: that bump completely gone, wiped out by lightning. So that's one. Two.
Speaker 1: They also are referencing this is the one that blows
Speaker 1: my mind. They're referencing fault lines. So you've got these
Speaker 1: stones which are between nineteen and sixty three feet tall,
Speaker 1: and you put them on some of the most seismically
Speaker 1: active area on the planet, and yet they don't fall down.
Speaker 1: It's like the designs so well that the center of
Speaker 1: the gravity of the stone enables them to stay upright
Speaker 1: unless someone goes up there and literally it gives it
Speaker 1: a good wagon pulls it down. So the stones are
Speaker 1: in a state of constant vibration, not enough for you
Speaker 1: to see it, but the vibration is enough to create
Speaker 1: an electrical current because it attached to the bedrock, you see,
Speaker 1: so it goes from one pH electric material to another.
Speaker 1: And those stones were carried as many as forty miles
Speaker 1: away because of the content of nice, of mica, of felspar, quartz, iron,
Speaker 1: And when you put all of those together in a
Speaker 1: large amount of rocks, you start creating it a kind
Speaker 1: of a collective energetic environment. We also have the fact
Speaker 1: that they are also referencing gravity anomalies. Now, how our
Speaker 1: ancestors were able to figure out that when they're walking
Speaker 1: for a specific piece of land, there's a deficient gravity
Speaker 1: area in that specific reason. That is amazing. It shows
Speaker 1: that they were so connected to the land they could
Speaker 1: sense the stuff. And now I'm talking about the fact
Speaker 1: that gravity is so different that your car takes and
Speaker 1: goes flying. I'm talking about the fact that there's a
Speaker 1: slight change in the gravitational field which allows you to
Speaker 1: interact with the human body and have an altered state
Speaker 1: of consciousness, which is why the folklore associates itself with
Speaker 1: altered states, with healings, and also with fertility, not just
Speaker 1: as a body, but also of plants that grow near
Speaker 1: the megalifts. Their plants are growing better than anywhere further
Speaker 1: away from the actual megaliths. So we now have an
Speaker 1: understanding that they were doing this a for attracting energy,
Speaker 1: to manipulating the energy field free altering the field of
Speaker 1: consciousness of any individual that goes anywhere near these things,
Speaker 1: to achieve a fertilizing effect on the land, the animals,
Speaker 1: and the people. So that's just as we've got so far.
Speaker 1: I'm sure there's other things that are also available that
Speaker 1: still haven't come out of the woodwork. But the part
Speaker 1: of the mechanism here is actually in the names of
Speaker 1: the sites itself. So Karmack, for example, that's not a
Speaker 1: local name, it's an Armenian phrase and it means the
Speaker 1: enclosure of stones of light. So now you're going to
Speaker 1: ask yourself what light are we with here? Are within
Speaker 1: with enlightenment where they're creating light out of the actual environment,
Speaker 1: like a kind of a testa device enables to illuminate
Speaker 1: the landscape. That's where we're with the research right now.
Speaker 1: To take this a stage further from the practical.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and well you connect these states with altered states
Speaker 2: or consciousness. What might someone have experienced inside or around
Speaker 2: like a functioning megalithic complex? And like, also what about
Speaker 2: the stone circles, because I know that Africa has the
Speaker 2: stone circles and then Britain also has the stone circles.
Speaker 2: Do they tie into this as well, because it seems
Speaker 2: like people get energetic shifts when they're around those as well.
Speaker 1: Oh. Absolutely, And the folklock talks about very very tall
Speaker 1: people moving the stones. In fact, giants seems to be
Speaker 1: everywhere in the folklore of megaliths, not just fairies and
Speaker 1: elves e. Which is a whole other story. But yeah,
Speaker 1: originally the elect Stonehenge, for example, the original builders that
Speaker 1: claimed to have been giants that came from Africa. Now
Speaker 1: we know that stones came from Wales and Scotland and
Speaker 1: also in the local area of Wheelshire. What the technology
Speaker 1: was who brought it may have actually come from Africa,
Speaker 1: because there is a precursor at the Stonehenge in Morocco
Speaker 1: to this very day. It's most of it's still there,
Speaker 1: incredibly enough, but they also had stories of the Gibberum,
Speaker 1: which are the giant people that move the stones. So
Speaker 1: it's not just the European thing, it's also an African
Speaker 1: observation and the fact that the spirits of the giant
Speaker 1: people or the fairy folk still live at these sites. Now,
Speaker 1: what was done when Karnak was being investigated was that
Speaker 1: the design and the shape of the meglifts also adjust
Speaker 1: the way that the energy behaves. So the dolmens, which
Speaker 1: are essentially the interior of eroded hills. By the way,
Speaker 1: all the soil cover is now gone. And you look
Speaker 1: at these things and they're beautiful and you think, why
Speaker 1: would you cover that with soil? Because it's beautiful to
Speaker 1: look at, and it's such an incredible effort to go
Speaker 1: to to balance those seven stones with the eighth which
Speaker 1: of the capstone. But then you cover in soil. Well,
Speaker 1: it turns out that the soil is built of organic
Speaker 1: layers and inorganic layers. And what it does it acts
Speaker 1: as a filter. Anybody, here's Wilhelm right, we understand what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. It's called the accumulation of orgone energy. So
Speaker 1: when you actually take an electric meter in the Dolmens,
Speaker 1: the frequency is much different from what it is on
Speaker 1: the outside, and there's frequencies there to lower your brain
Speaker 1: wave patterns, to stop you thinking and stop and get
Speaker 1: to feel much more.
Speaker 2: So.
Speaker 1: Basically, the design of the dolmant acts like a great
Speaker 1: big concentrator and it allows you to put yourself in
Speaker 1: a state of grace. And then at certain times of
Speaker 1: the day, like in the morning, the energy is much
Speaker 1: more intense. And if you open yourself up to the
Speaker 1: possibility or just going as a skeptic, as someone who
Speaker 1: hasn't made up there at their mind, which is the
Speaker 1: way to be, and see what happens to you in
Speaker 1: the morning, see if you get a sense that there's
Speaker 1: something else around you. And the more you do it,
Speaker 1: I mean, I got to the point now where I
Speaker 1: can see people coming in and out of the dolmens
Speaker 1: because I've been doing it for so long that I
Speaker 1: become very sensitive to the actual energy of these things.
Speaker 1: So I can sense the energy moving in moving out,
Speaker 1: the memory of people in there. So when I go
Speaker 1: in and as as you do this as an exercise
Speaker 1: to come up with a new idea for a book,
Speaker 1: for example, I just go in and say, well, what's
Speaker 1: this all about. I don't really know enough about this,
Speaker 1: but how can I tell the story? And I just
Speaker 1: sit there in a kind of a dream state and
Speaker 1: start writing notes. And I thought, well, if this is
Speaker 1: true about these sites, it'll be fantastic as a story.
Speaker 1: And I go and research it for about four five years,
Speaker 1: and sure enough the information is there. So it's like
Speaker 1: the stones are telling you something. They're alive, and even
Speaker 1: a simple standing stone behaves very the same way. They
Speaker 1: behave like a big accumulator like a needle. And I
Speaker 1: remember Pierre Merou, who was the lead scientist in Karnak,
Speaker 1: saying he's also an electrical engineer. He said, well, I
Speaker 1: probe the stones and I found that they seem to
Speaker 1: suck in the energy from the surrounding landscape. They suck
Speaker 1: in the serpent energy and then it accumulates for about
Speaker 1: seventy minutes, and then it discharges, and there's discharges like
Speaker 1: ripples in a pond. I'm a dowser also by trades,
Speaker 1: so I was able to actually figure out before I
Speaker 1: read there's report that each of these stones also has
Speaker 1: a ripple effects. And it's not just like someone throwing
Speaker 1: a stone in the pond and you see the big ripples,
Speaker 1: and the ripples get slower and slower as you get
Speaker 1: within say forty feet of the actual standing stone. The
Speaker 1: gap between the actual ripples is conformed by an invisible
Speaker 1: geometric array, and that's the language of nature. So it's
Speaker 1: not just haphazard geometry. It structured energy as well. And
Speaker 1: if you happen to touch the stone before it's been
Speaker 1: this charge, you will I guarantee you get an electric shock.
Speaker 1: There's many people that this has happened to. You won't
Speaker 1: feel your forearm for about ten minutes. It's quite potent.
Speaker 1: And the stone circles is said, well, they attract the
Speaker 1: energy from the landscape and they best concentrate it like
Speaker 1: a big circle, which of course is what they do.
Speaker 1: And one of the biggest experiments was done at Averbury,
Speaker 1: the world's biggest stone circle, and what was found was
Speaker 1: that the stone avenue leading into the actual stone circle,
Speaker 1: the stones are being positioned so that the magnetic pole
Speaker 1: of the stone has a positive charge on the inside
Speaker 1: and it matches a negative charge on the stone on
Speaker 1: the other side, and then it alternates. So you're going
Speaker 1: down this sort of movement of energy from left to right,
Speaker 1: from left to right as you're approaching the stone circle,
Speaker 1: and a scientist from Switzerland will say, well, that's how
Speaker 1: we build so the world's biggest particle collider, using magnetic
Speaker 1: poles in opposite polarities to move atoms in this enormous
Speaker 1: circular thing. So the ancients figured it out before we did.
Speaker 1: And what happens around Asbury is that before dawn all
Speaker 1: the readings literally disappear inside the stone circle, but the
Speaker 1: energy of the land is attracted to the ditch around
Speaker 1: the actual stone circle. It starts moving around like a
Speaker 1: particle collider, and the moment the sun crosses the horizon,
Speaker 1: all the readings around Avebury. And I got to say
Speaker 1: that there are hundreds of electric probes put into the
Speaker 1: ground to actually measure this they found that suddenly this
Speaker 1: opening happens between the two big portal stones of Asbury,
Speaker 1: and all the energy that's been accumulating in that ditch
Speaker 1: doubles in frequency and it goes into the center of
Speaker 1: the stone circle, and the stone circle is almost rigging
Speaker 1: up from slumber. And it happens every single morning. So
Speaker 1: by the time you get to the late evening, you
Speaker 1: feel that the stone circle there's not much energy there. Yeah,
Speaker 1: because like a person, it's accumulated, it's spent what's energy
Speaker 1: and is now going to sleep. And that's something that
Speaker 1: the Egyptian said about the temples too. In the morning,
Speaker 1: you've got to wake the temple up like a sleeping person.
Speaker 1: So we now know that the stones aren't just stones,
Speaker 1: they're actually living organisms. They are alive and they concentrate,
Speaker 1: move store energy relative to their design.
Speaker 2: So do you think these were strategically placed around the
Speaker 2: planet to like regulate the energy of the planet and
Speaker 2: produce more like harmonizing energy.
Speaker 1: Who knows? This is now a hypothesis. It seems to
Speaker 1: be more than a conjecture that they weren't just doing
Speaker 1: this to create all the states of consciousness or improve
Speaker 1: crop yields. It seems to be a lot of work
Speaker 1: to do that. It seems as though there's another thing
Speaker 1: here that we haven't yet processed, and it may have
Speaker 1: been to do with something that Tesla originally suggested that
Speaker 1: in the ancient times they use stone structures in a
Speaker 1: certain geometric and position way to tap the natural energy
Speaker 1: of the land in order to the energy from A
Speaker 1: to B. And I'm beginning to suspect that's exactly what
Speaker 1: they were doing. Can't prove it yet, so it's still
Speaker 1: in the hypothesis stage and we're slowly moving in that direction.
Speaker 1: But it seems to me that all these antennas all
Speaker 1: around the planet were appeared to be part of one
Speaker 1: whole concept, which is which brings us to the point
Speaker 1: of I'm sure the Atlantic world will come into the
Speaker 1: story at some point. And I was actually asking myself
Speaker 1: the same question when I was going around France filming
Speaker 1: along the coastline. It occurred to me that the older
Speaker 1: sites are along the coast and they get younger as
Speaker 1: they go into the actual woods and back then Central
Speaker 1: Europe was really hard to get through at the end
Speaker 1: of the Ice Age because it was full of impediments,
Speaker 1: and also it was mostly forested, so it appears that
Speaker 1: it was a seafaring culture, which means that the actual
Speaker 1: stones are running away from the ocean, because today with
Speaker 1: so now we can actually see many stone circles and
Speaker 1: stone avenues around the Britney coast underwater. So simple is
Speaker 1: that the water level began to rise around six thousand BC,
Speaker 1: which means all the stuff that we see today has
Speaker 1: a precursor that's older than six thousand BC under the ocean.
Speaker 1: And I came across one archaeological report between Sardinia, sorry
Speaker 1: between Sicily and Tunisia in the Mediterranean Channel, which was
Speaker 1: found at a depth of one hundred and twenty meters,
Speaker 1: and it's a stone, one simple stone. It's exactly the
Speaker 1: same height as many the tall stones in Brittany, and
Speaker 1: it's the same shape. And the only way it could
Speaker 1: have been put there was by people who existed during
Speaker 1: the Ice Age, because that stone would i fact, have
Speaker 1: been on dry land before eight thousand BC, because the
Speaker 1: Mediterrane began to rise only a thousand years earlier than that.
Speaker 1: So we are dealing with another culture, not just the
Speaker 1: one from the Blacks at sea in the Caspian Sea
Speaker 1: that moved there around six thousand BC and built another
Speaker 1: group of monuments. We're dealing within even earlier culture started
Speaker 1: the whole thing rolling. And the only people I can
Speaker 1: think of again is the other Nach because they were
Speaker 1: also over in the middle of the Atlantic. They used
Speaker 1: to call them the off User. It means the people
Speaker 1: of the Serpent. So it's the same group of people
Speaker 1: going by a different name, and they have the same story.
Speaker 1: In Yucatan, the Maya called call them the Knoll, which
Speaker 1: means in their language people are the serpent and they
Speaker 1: came from a sunken island in the middle of the
Speaker 1: Atlantic during a global flood.
Speaker 2: Wow. So, but like it seems like evidence connects the
Speaker 2: meget bots to like Armenia and the Black Sea. Do
Speaker 2: you think that's originally where they started out or where
Speaker 2: they you know, it seems like maybe they were from
Speaker 2: off world or some other dements. I don't know what.
Speaker 2: Maybe you're more advanced humans. But did did they start
Speaker 2: off in the Armenia or Black Sea region?
Speaker 1: We don't know. That's the story that we get in
Speaker 1: the West, because you know, the Europeans are the ones
Speaker 1: that are picking up the story. Whereas when I travel
Speaker 1: to the Pacific. The stories get wildly more older as
Speaker 1: we get further into deep water, and the Pacific actually
Speaker 1: lost more coastline during the end of the ices than
Speaker 1: any part of the planet. And I've always said this
Speaker 1: as a hypothesis that much of what we know today
Speaker 1: from understanding of ancient countries and archaeology really comes from
Speaker 1: a European point of view, which puts the Middle East
Speaker 1: as the importance in this and the beginning of everything
Speaker 1: because of the influence of Catholicism and the Bible, you know,
Speaker 1: the Garden of Eden, the whole traditions of or Jewish tradition.
Speaker 1: It's very centraliut around there, but when I get to
Speaker 1: South America and the Pacific, it's a completely different story.
Speaker 1: I get even all the stories from the Aboriginal people
Speaker 1: about people who lived on islands, island nations in the
Speaker 1: middle of the Pacific which have now long gone. Even
Speaker 1: Easter Island used to be an archipelago. When I speak
Speaker 1: to the grandmothers of a tribe that lived there during
Speaker 1: the Ice Age, and they were called a Waitaha, and
Speaker 1: they talk about the gods, the Urukeu, with whom they
Speaker 1: interacted with on a regular level, and they used to
Speaker 1: go from South America from Tiwan Napu where they had
Speaker 1: their temple, which is one of the oldest sites on Earth.
Speaker 1: It's fifteen thousand BC, Tijuanaku, and they used to go
Speaker 1: to Easter Island as a stop on the way to
Speaker 1: a place called the Birthplace of the Gods, which is
Speaker 1: in the South Island of New Zealand, and it's still
Speaker 1: there by the way. I recommend you go to this
Speaker 1: place because it's mind blowing. So that's just that story.
Speaker 1: The Aborigins have another story about this, and also they're
Speaker 1: Hope and the Zuni have their own stories about the
Speaker 1: islands that that came from in the middle of the
Speaker 1: Pacific called Kashkara, and we don't know where it is,
Speaker 1: somewhere between Hawaii and Baja California, could be anywhere, but
Speaker 1: they said no, we were helped by these people, and
Speaker 1: they were the ones that brought us to Arizona where
Speaker 1: we are today. And the main leader that helped them
Speaker 1: get to Arizona is the original name of Mount Ararat
Speaker 1: in Armenia. So how the hell do these things come together?
Speaker 1: So I don't know. All I know is that when
Speaker 1: I was writing The Missing Lands, the book. I actually
Speaker 1: focused on this story because I wanted to find out
Speaker 1: who who were the gods? Who were these people? And
Speaker 1: the best I've been able to figure out listening to
Speaker 1: every ancient culture from the planet was that they lived
Speaker 1: on eight islands or places that behave like islands, including
Speaker 1: tijuan Naku, which itself was an island city back when
Speaker 1: Lady t Kaka used to surround it. There's another one
Speaker 1: in the Armenian Highlands, which I think I've finally found
Speaker 1: the h Island of the Gods, but I got to
Speaker 1: go there and I have to prove it. It's been
Speaker 1: there's been a bit of a war down there, so
Speaker 1: with Azerbaijan, so things have been a little bit sort
Speaker 1: of dodgery. I don't want to be working in a
Speaker 1: war zone. But the other islands have pretty much vanished.
Speaker 1: We have the Atlantis story in the middle of the Atlantic.
Speaker 1: We have an island off the coast of Saudi Arabia
Speaker 1: called Tepitaka, which means the free Baskets of Knowledge, which
Speaker 1: is the free baskets that you see carved on the
Speaker 1: pillar of gobec Tepe so as the same people and
Speaker 1: there's the stories from the cook islands from the elders
Speaker 1: that said, that's where the the the Tuperaki as they
Speaker 1: called him, not the other knock at the tuper Noaki.
Speaker 1: That's where they lived. They had an island off the
Speaker 1: coast of Saudi Arabia and it sang during the Great Flood.
Speaker 1: So this is as about my far I could figure out.
Speaker 1: There was a kind of a brother and sisterhood of
Speaker 1: gods all around the planet that lived on eight different locations,
Speaker 1: and whenever they were forced to or they had to,
Speaker 1: they would communicate with humans. So that's about as far
Speaker 1: as I got with with that project, and it's still
Speaker 1: an ongoing thing because I'm looking into the rubbish bag
Speaker 1: of history here my friend looking at as.
Speaker 2: By the way, my friend, my friend Rock Costaldo, who
Speaker 2: comes on my show all the time. He he he
Speaker 2: studied a lot of history too. He'd like to have
Speaker 2: you on his show. I'll introduced you to him. He's
Speaker 2: actually gonna speaking of Megaleth conference in New York this weekend,
Speaker 2: like you know, so I'll introduce you guys. But he
Speaker 2: wanted me to ask you. I'll put it up on
Speaker 2: that Yeah, he says, he says, did you know about
Speaker 2: the dragons terms with the markings and water birds on
Speaker 2: them like the heron.
Speaker 1: I know about the dragon stones in Armenia.
Speaker 2: Yeah, what is that? Where is it?
Speaker 1: Yes, they are enormous stones and I think they're about
Speaker 1: thirteen feet there's the minimal height. And they're marking the
Speaker 1: actual correlation point between telluric currents, which is called the
Speaker 1: serpent lines, not lay lines, that's something very different, but
Speaker 1: it's the telluric currents that flow through the earth where
Speaker 1: they fall an X. Unfortunately, Harrison Ford was wrong and
Speaker 1: he said X never marked the spot. Actually X does
Speaker 1: mark the spot because whenever those xes interact on the landscape,
Speaker 1: they create the kind of a vortex of energy, and
Speaker 1: the water that seems to congregate under these spots is
Speaker 1: charged because there's water, holy water and the vishtaps, which
Speaker 1: is what they call the dragon stones in Armenia. They
Speaker 1: basically work a symbol of fecundity. Some of them shaped
Speaker 1: like dragons, Muslims shaped like fish, and I think that
Speaker 1: came later with humans sort of chiseling away. So we
Speaker 1: didn't forget the reason why they were there. Because the
Speaker 1: original stones have no marketings whatsoever, not familiar one with
Speaker 1: the heron on it though, But I am familiar with
Speaker 1: the ones that are marked like fish and the shape
Speaker 1: like dragons, and they call them dragon stones.
Speaker 2: And what I think is really cool is that you
Speaker 2: got to travel kind of all over the world and
Speaker 2: get the stories from the local people and people from
Speaker 2: villages right about like this all the different stuff, like
Speaker 2: they know that. It seems like they know about the
Speaker 2: different more about the ancient people and the and the
Speaker 2: megalis Like that had to be fascinating. Did you did
Speaker 2: you go all over the world and where all did
Speaker 2: you go to?
Speaker 1: Like? Yeah, because I like to. It's a wonderful American
Speaker 1: accounting system that allows me to write off my expenses,
Speaker 1: which is what I like living here. No say, it
Speaker 1: dawned on me coming from a European point of view
Speaker 1: that we are the last culture on the planet. Europe
Speaker 1: Resource presented itself as the you know, the height of civilization. Well,
Speaker 1: that depends on your point of view. I would say
Speaker 1: that most Aboriginal people that live in the desert, who
Speaker 1: can live in the desert just by watching the clouds
Speaker 1: or by the way that bushes grow, they will spill
Speaker 1: to survive in a climate where most Europeans would die
Speaker 1: in seconds, and I was positive that we are the
Speaker 1: last group of people on the planet. It's like we're
Speaker 1: going west, but we're getting further away from the point
Speaker 1: of origin, which I do believe at one point was
Speaker 1: the Pacific. And so my point was to go and
Speaker 1: talk to these people and hear it from their point
Speaker 1: of view, because their ancestors were there, they were closer
Speaker 1: to the events than we will ever be in our lifetime.
Speaker 1: I mean, there are people in Egypt whose great great
Speaker 1: great great great grandparents were closer to the building of
Speaker 1: the Pyramids than we are today. So why not ask
Speaker 1: them what they thought, what was their point of view?
Speaker 1: Because these stories are transmitted orally from generation to generation,
Speaker 1: and it took great pride in getting the facts right.
Speaker 1: The Druids, for example, to learn all this information, they
Speaker 1: would spend ten years memory the history of their culture
Speaker 1: and their previous cultures in order to commit this so
Speaker 1: that the next generation knows how to get things right.
Speaker 1: So the more I hear, the more I start piecing
Speaker 1: things together. And a lot of them have never had
Speaker 1: any personal interaction. But this is where learning dead languages
Speaker 1: comes in really useful. I'm very glad to have some
Speaker 1: great assistance when I go everywhere, because they have their context.
Speaker 1: So I said, look, we're in South America, we're up
Speaker 1: in the Andes, and Lady Dikaka, who can I talk
Speaker 1: to you about the flood? And Vida Kostia, Oh, you
Speaker 1: need to talk to the Aymara and the Puccina. And
Speaker 1: there's only three thousand of them left, so you know,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm very graceful. I said, look, I'm just
Speaker 1: trying to understand from a European point of view, how
Speaker 1: to get the story right from your perspective from people
Speaker 1: who were there long ago, because you're about to be
Speaker 1: closer to the truth than we are. And of course
Speaker 1: it brings down the wall immediately. I'm not trying to
Speaker 1: rip them off. I'm trying to use their words to
Speaker 1: support a foundation. And once I get into the language
Speaker 1: and learning about the subtlety language, and they're telling me
Speaker 1: the story, and I'll say, wait a minute. What you've
Speaker 1: just described it about the monument builders in LinkedIn Dikaka
Speaker 1: is how they would describe the followers of Horace in Egypt.
Speaker 1: So how do they call Vida Kosha? And he said, well,
Speaker 1: they said, well he was here with seven helpers. He
Speaker 1: was the like the charismatic leader. And I said, do
Speaker 1: you realize that that story happens all around the world,
Speaker 1: That these gods appear on these Pacific coastlines around the
Speaker 1: planet at the end of the Ice Age, they give
Speaker 1: us the information about how to restart civilization. And they're
Speaker 1: always in groups of seven with one woman who carries
Speaker 1: the bloodline, the genetic bloodline, and the h is a
Speaker 1: charismatic leader. And they went, wow, we didn't know that.
Speaker 1: And so what do you call the people who were
Speaker 1: helping Vida Koshia? And they said, well, they were the
Speaker 1: hihiwa Panti. What does that mean? That means the shining ones?
Speaker 1: And I said, well, do you realize that that's what
Speaker 1: they called the followers of Horus and the Anaki? And
Speaker 1: then they opened up and they went, well, that doesn't
Speaker 1: surprise us, because the Egyptians were coming here along time ago.
Speaker 1: There were great seafarers. And if you start looking at
Speaker 1: the language threshold between South America and Egypt, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of overlaps. Just like in the Maya world, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of overlap between the Egyptian language and Maya language,
Speaker 1: as well, for example, Maya is for you go to
Speaker 1: Egypt use you ask for a bottle of water and
Speaker 1: you say maya. That means water, and the Maya means
Speaker 1: water people. So there's a lot of interaction around the
Speaker 1: world between ancient cultures that European academics have never credited
Speaker 1: anyone with because they claim that back then people were stupid.
Speaker 1: They weren't getting around very much, they were wearing loincloths,
Speaker 1: not doing anything important. Until we get to know Sumeria
Speaker 1: or Greece, you know, and then you know, Europe takes off.
Speaker 1: Well that's a Eurocentric point of view, but if you
Speaker 1: go to the other side of the world, it's a
Speaker 1: much more beautiful story and it all overclaps beautifully. Even
Speaker 1: with the hopey stories of North America, all their stories
Speaker 1: begin to line up emerge beautifully. So what I found
Speaker 1: by talking to the local cultures, I'm filling in the
Speaker 1: whole that we have in archaeology and academia, which no
Speaker 1: one wants to talk about because they're not giving the
Speaker 1: ancient people any credit.
Speaker 2: This is so fast. I love this, This is so interesting,
Speaker 2: like it seems like relative.
Speaker 1: It is.
Speaker 2: What I was gonna say, was so do you think
Speaker 2: we need to throw up the whole narrative of history.
Speaker 2: Like I wanted to ask you that, like Columbus came here,
Speaker 2: do you think there were already people in America? And
Speaker 2: then also the fact that do you as what do
Speaker 2: you think about the idea of Pangaea that all the
Speaker 2: continents were once connected? I don't know if you ever
Speaker 2: get into that.
Speaker 1: That's impossible to work out. It's a pure conjecture. We
Speaker 1: can't go back trillions of years and figure that out.
Speaker 1: We had a geology to back it up, that perhaps
Speaker 1: all the continents were together at one point, But then
Speaker 1: you've got a factor in erosion as well. That's a
Speaker 1: big concept in terms of understanding how things fit. They
Speaker 1: may fit from the point of view today, but you
Speaker 1: know one hundred two hundred million years ago, a billion
Speaker 1: years ago, things look very very different, and the efforts
Speaker 1: sometimes it's been upside down as well, which any ancient
Speaker 1: culture talks about. There's a periodic renewal of the planet
Speaker 1: where objects from the sky come crashing down, and if
Speaker 1: they crashed down at the wrong place at the wrong time,
Speaker 1: the Earth actually revolves in the opposite direction, and sometimes
Speaker 1: the poles actually move physically move. And you hear this
Speaker 1: in Egypt, you hear this in South America, North America,
Speaker 1: and so forth. So it's very hard to figure that out.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, the other question was about Columbus. Do you
Speaker 2: think we throw out that narrative that Columbus or do
Speaker 2: you think there might have already been people here in
Speaker 2: North America?
Speaker 1: Everybody was here, of everybody was here. The Portuguese were
Speaker 1: here before Columbus. I found a map in Harvard Library
Speaker 1: that shows the Portuguese and Templar flag in a labor
Speaker 1: of data, which is now lave of Dada, which means
Speaker 1: labor in Portuguese, by the way, And there's all these
Speaker 1: diagrams of drying salt cod, which is the favorite dish
Speaker 1: of Portugal. And that was long before Columbus, who didn't
Speaker 1: even get to America, by the way. He went to
Speaker 1: the fisherman in Lisbon finding out how do you get
Speaker 1: to the big continent over there? And of course we've
Speaker 1: been going there for I was born in Portugal. We've
Speaker 1: been going there for hundreds of years. It was a
Speaker 1: major fishing trading route for the Portuguese, and we kept
Speaker 1: it quiet. We worked with the nobles of Scotland and
Speaker 1: also the Genuese pilots who are incredible navigators. So we
Speaker 1: gave him vague directions and he's still after free trials,
Speaker 1: still didn't land in America. By the way, we thought
Speaker 1: he was a bit of an idiot in Lisbon, and
Speaker 1: he's still as a certain sort of support for him
Speaker 1: as a nice meaning but completely idiotic sailor as part
Speaker 1: of the folklore. No, I mean, the Cherokee have been
Speaker 1: here for at least what fifteen thousand years and they
Speaker 1: claimed that, and it's just been improved, and they found
Speaker 1: artifacts and DNA and carbon fourteen dating of their sites
Speaker 1: in the Appalachia, which shows that they were here well
Speaker 1: during the Ice Age and even before that. The last
Speaker 1: I say, in the previous Ice Age there were stories
Speaker 1: by the Zuni and the Hope that they were also
Speaker 1: moving here by nine thousand BC, and they can prove it.
Speaker 1: A tribe in the coast of Vancouver. I don't remember
Speaker 1: what the name is, I'm very sorry, and they said that,
Speaker 1: you know, we're tired of people trying to tell us
Speaker 1: about our own history. We lived here during the Ice Age.
Speaker 1: There was a warm water that came from the Pacific,
Speaker 1: and we lived along the coast, which makes a lot
Speaker 1: of sense. Well, it took a couple of archaeologists who
Speaker 1: were a bit more open minded to go to these
Speaker 1: spots that they're being told to look at. They dug
Speaker 1: up the coast and they found that all the habitations
Speaker 1: the totem poles and the existence of habitation of this
Speaker 1: tribe in the middle of the Ice Age. So the
Speaker 1: whole story of human Ovrais in the last twenty years
Speaker 1: has to be completely erased and restarted again because of
Speaker 1: the new information that we're getting. So it was a
Speaker 1: very populous place, even though Oklahoma, there are sites just
Speaker 1: outside of Tulsa that showed the there was a mosaic
Speaker 1: floor covered by what used to be the ocean at
Speaker 1: that point, which is now the Gulf of Mexico. I
Speaker 1: repeat that, the Gulf of Mexico, which is now covered
Speaker 1: by layers of debrey and limestone. And they found this
Speaker 1: beautiful mosaic floor still intact when they're putting the foundation
Speaker 1: for a walmart, and they found that these holes perfectly
Speaker 1: drilled as specific units from each other, which happens to
Speaker 1: be the same unit of measure called a megalithic yard
Speaker 1: that was used to create the stone circles of Europe.
Speaker 1: And that's just the tip of the iceberg in Oklahoma,
Speaker 1: by the way, there's a lot more going on down there.
Speaker 2: Wow yeah, yeah, yeah. I even interviewed this guy. His
Speaker 2: name's Sandy Nichols. Like he's he was on Coast and
Speaker 2: Coast a am. And what's interesting about him is he
Speaker 2: lives in Tennessee. But where he lived in Tennessee, in
Speaker 2: his backyard he dug up like an Aztec burial ground
Speaker 2: or something like that. It's like it's like he has
Speaker 2: he has come people there to his house and like,
Speaker 2: you know, look at it. I thought it was fascinating.
Speaker 2: It's it's something ancient. It's it's definitely not like you know,
Speaker 2: pipulated or anything like that. It's, uh, it's it's And
Speaker 2: then what's interesting about his house is, like I don't
Speaker 2: know what made me think of this, is his house
Speaker 2: is really paranormal. Like he buried like a like a
Speaker 2: g a huge g ode under the welcome mat in
Speaker 2: front of his door. And he gets all kinds of
Speaker 2: weird anomalies happening and stuff like that. And I think
Speaker 2: it's maybe tied to what's in his backyard or whatever
Speaker 2: he found there.
Speaker 1: The management, The management has got their phone number. He's
Speaker 1: got they got his phone number, asked a Cherokee. I mean,
Speaker 1: I love having conversations with a Cherokee whenever I can. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's fantastic. They'll tell you who built soup a mound
Speaker 1: and the fact that they showed up it was already
Speaker 1: a culture and decline, and they just kept kept up
Speaker 1: the grounds, the landscaping to make sure it would in
Speaker 1: the road. So they said, no, we didn't build. It
Speaker 1: was already here when we came over. And that was
Speaker 1: around the end of the Ice Age. So yeah, you
Speaker 1: just talked to him about the mound builders and where
Speaker 1: they came from. Someone came up from Central America. Some
Speaker 1: were here, and they came they went down to Central America.
Speaker 1: There's all this movement of people across the continent. And
Speaker 1: of course we're getting the story in school that you know,
Speaker 1: this is the New World and the Europeans came here. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but when they arrived they thought that they were the
Speaker 1: high point of civilization. So when the Cortez and company
Speaker 1: and all the other blood firstly bastards show up in
Speaker 1: middle of Mexico and find this incredible temple city in
Speaker 1: the middle of a lake, which looks like Venice on steroids.
Speaker 1: They were absolutely blown away. In fact, most of the
Speaker 1: priests that were with there's the Spanish. They put down
Speaker 1: their swords and their cross and they said, we've been
Speaker 1: led to about history this. You know, this is an
Speaker 1: even older country here, even older and more grander than
Speaker 1: what we see in Europe. So why don't we study
Speaker 1: it before we start killing it? So I do believe.
Speaker 1: And now with the latest studies in the Amazon, which
Speaker 1: is bring the fact that there's a whole civilization in
Speaker 1: the middle of the Amazon, uh, we're having to completely
Speaker 1: rethink the whole structure of and the fact that history
Speaker 1: began probably somewhere else. And again, for my money, for
Speaker 1: my one dollar's worth, I would say it's all in
Speaker 1: the Pacific and it's now under the ocean.
Speaker 2: Well, do you think it was like a concerted effort
Speaker 2: to cover up history or do you think it's a
Speaker 2: miscommunication that we were or do you think it's like
Speaker 2: history is written by the victors, so we're getting a
Speaker 2: picture of what they want us to hear. Do you
Speaker 2: think it's kind of all the above?
Speaker 1: All the above? If you go back to the origin
Speaker 1: of archaeology in Britain in the Victorian era. The point
Speaker 1: of archaeology is to validate the fact that the Earth
Speaker 1: was created in four four hundred BC on a Tuesday
Speaker 1: sometime in August, which is preposterous. You have to create
Speaker 1: the universe, create the Earth, create dinosaurs, wipe them out
Speaker 1: and then get to Adam and Eve on board in
Speaker 1: less than four thousand years. It's ridiculous. And if you
Speaker 1: see the origins of archaeology and how they progress into
Speaker 1: the early twentieth century, they were still trying to validate
Speaker 1: that fit in the New World into that and the
Speaker 1: Americas and how that fits and the contortioners that they
Speaker 1: had to go through in order to fit it into
Speaker 1: the biblical narrative. They've only just come out of that
Speaker 1: in the last eighty years, so I'm got to give
Speaker 1: me a little credit. They are trying, but we're still
Speaker 1: holding on to the fact that everyone that came before
Speaker 1: us in the twenty first century was a barbarian. And
Speaker 1: yet you look at spaces like Stonehenge or the big
Speaker 1: stone circle up in Orkney called Brogard. They married the
Speaker 1: heavens and the solar and the Lunarus cycles of perfect precision.
Speaker 1: These calendars are never going to go out a date.
Speaker 1: So how they're able to do this. We have the
Speaker 1: Maya who have something like thirty different calendars, some of
Speaker 1: them track time crossing something like fifteen thousand years. What
Speaker 1: would you care about that length of time? If you're
Speaker 1: a farmer that all you want to do is something
Speaker 1: that tells you whether the sun and the moon they
Speaker 1: are going to be, so you can sew, you can
Speaker 1: read the crops and start the process all over again.
Speaker 1: And then if the tree trunks that you've used on
Speaker 1: the ground to align these solar objects, well if they
Speaker 1: fall down, you just get new tree trunks and you
Speaker 1: put them back up again. You don't need to use
Speaker 1: enormous pyramids or massive stone circles to tell you what's
Speaker 1: happening in the sky. So I do think that the
Speaker 1: people that were here before, again, to quote the Sumerians,
Speaker 1: the difference between us and God's was that a god
Speaker 1: was someone who understood the laws of nature and had
Speaker 1: to bend those rules. Within the confines of the rules.
Speaker 1: You can't go outside the rules. The rules are there
Speaker 1: for a reason. But they were able to tuning into
Speaker 1: magnetic energy, they could move the magnetic lines, they could
Speaker 1: move an ethical current, they could change the weather. Ask
Speaker 1: any body in Brazil, in the jungle or the hoping
Speaker 1: and the Navajo, they say, yeah, we're going to go
Speaker 1: out and make some rain. Now, pure power of intention,
Speaker 1: which is itself and is an electromagnetic signal that you
Speaker 1: send out into nature, and nature, if you know what
Speaker 1: you're doing, will respond relative to the laws of nature.
Speaker 1: So that's what makes you a god. So we've also,
Speaker 1: you know, confused gods were being otherworldly beings or aliens
Speaker 1: or invisible people. They might be, but in the our
Speaker 1: answers realize that the gods are very practical, normal people
Speaker 1: like us. They were just much taller, and you know,
Speaker 1: eight and a half feet tall, and they looked very unusual.
Speaker 1: And like we said at the beginning, the skin was
Speaker 1: so light that they had to put some sort of
Speaker 1: sunstreen on it, which give it the shining appearance. But
Speaker 1: that wasn't the only part of the metaphor. It was
Speaker 1: the fact that when you are a learned person, which
Speaker 1: differentiates you from a hunter gatherer, it gives you a
Speaker 1: certain glow. That's what the metaphor is it's like enlightened. Yeah, enlightened.
Speaker 1: So when you have holy people depicted in pictures, you
Speaker 1: see this halo around them. Yeah, that's a glow. That's
Speaker 1: a shining person. You have a glow about you, there's
Speaker 1: a shine about you. So there were two things that
Speaker 1: represented this particular metaphor.
Speaker 2: That's fascinating. Well, well, I was going to say, we've
Speaker 2: been going about an hour. Is there anything else you
Speaker 2: want to cover about the documentary? And if not, you
Speaker 2: could tell people where they could say it. And this
Speaker 2: was awesome, pretty Thank you so much for doing this.
Speaker 2: This was really cool.
Speaker 1: No, it's a labor of love. It's take me five
Speaker 1: years to put this together and portray the megalism the
Speaker 1: way they haven't been done before. The thing is, I
Speaker 1: shot it originally in black and white. It's actually a
Speaker 1: very melancholic story at the end of it. But if
Speaker 1: the black and white film I always wanted to do
Speaker 1: with kind of a film noir of megaliths, it strips
Speaker 1: out all the distraction and you see the stones for
Speaker 1: the geometry and the shapes, and you begin to realize
Speaker 1: the shapes mean something. They are recurring shapes all around
Speaker 1: the world. That's the next project. What are the shapes
Speaker 1: meaning there? As, for example, the same shape which looks
Speaker 1: like a boomerang stone, which is in Orkney, it's in Ireland,
Speaker 1: it's in Brittany, it's in Portugal, it's in Armenia. So
Speaker 1: now I have to go back to all the places
Speaker 1: I've been to and measure what these stones are trying
Speaker 1: to tell me. They seem to be part of a
Speaker 1: language here. So or maybe someone else just watching the
Speaker 1: wants to take it on to themselves. Please share the information.
Speaker 1: It's a massive project, but the black and white documentary
Speaker 1: makes a lot more sense. The problem is that when
Speaker 1: I saw the right Segaia television, they only bought the
Speaker 1: color version, which looks beautiful by the way, but it's
Speaker 1: not quite as real. So it's you'll see that. You'll
Speaker 1: see both versions only on my video channel, which is
Speaker 1: on my website. So and also get paid more.
Speaker 2: And there's added Invisible Temple dot com or Freddie Snila
Speaker 2: dot com or.
Speaker 1: Both Invisible Temple dot com.
Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, this was awesome. Yeah, I really enjoyed this. This,
Speaker 2: I mean this literally some of the stuff you told me.
Speaker 2: It blew me away. I really did so, thank you.
Speaker 2: I mean yeah, well, thank you so much everybody, and
Speaker 2: thank you Freddie, and guys go check out Freddie's website
Speaker 2: Freddie Silva dot com or Invisible Temple dot com and
Speaker 2: thank you so much. Have a nice day, guys, and
Speaker 2: thank you Freddie.