WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>You can have a token that is not itself a security,

2
00:00:04.200 --> 00:00:07.679
<v Speaker 1>but is offered in a transaction that is a securities offering.

3
00:00:07.919 --> 00:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Thinking about how that applies, I think that's really caused

4
00:00:11.960 --> 00:00:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Congress and us at the SEC to think about what

5
00:00:15.679 --> 00:00:19.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of rules make sense here. Congress has the opportunity

6
00:00:19.719 --> 00:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>now to write a new framework.

7
00:00:23.120 --> 00:00:25.679
<v Speaker 2>So, Commissioner Purse, you mean the oranges in my house

8
00:00:25.760 --> 00:00:27.679
<v Speaker 2>right now are the supermarket are not securities?

9
00:00:28.199 --> 00:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Because how I'm.

10
00:00:29.160 --> 00:00:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Going to say? They're not securities, but you could still

11
00:00:31.199 --> 00:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to sell them in a transaction

12
00:00:33.359 --> 00:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that is a securities transaction.

13
00:00:40.159 --> 00:00:42.600
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by Uphold, which is

14
00:00:42.640 --> 00:00:45.679
<v Speaker 2>a great crypto platform that makes it easy to buy, sell,

15
00:00:45.840 --> 00:00:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and stay crypto assets. Uphold has over three hundred plus cryptocurrencies,

16
00:00:50.640 --> 00:00:53.520
<v Speaker 2>including bitcoin in all the top all coins, and they

17
00:00:53.600 --> 00:00:58.079
<v Speaker 2>offer a crypto staking on over nineteen crypto assets. I've

18
00:00:58.079 --> 00:01:00.600
<v Speaker 2>been a user of the platform for many years. They

19
00:01:00.640 --> 00:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>are safe and reliable, they don't commingle or lend out

20
00:01:03.840 --> 00:01:07.239
<v Speaker 2>your crypto funds, and they are one hundred percent reserve.

21
00:01:07.519 --> 00:01:11.400
<v Speaker 2>You can review their transparency report. Uphold also offers an

22
00:01:11.439 --> 00:01:14.239
<v Speaker 2>amazing rewards program where you can earn up to five

23
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:17.959
<v Speaker 2>point two five percent on stable coins. This rewards program

24
00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>also allows you to get twenty four hour early access

25
00:01:21.040 --> 00:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to new tokens that they list, and to participate, you

26
00:01:24.359 --> 00:01:26.760
<v Speaker 2>just simply have to open the app once per month,

27
00:01:26.879 --> 00:01:29.879
<v Speaker 2>deposit fifty dollars once per month, and trade fifty dollars

28
00:01:29.879 --> 00:01:32.519
<v Speaker 2>once per month. And the stable coins that they support

29
00:01:32.640 --> 00:01:35.400
<v Speaker 2>includes Ripples, r L USD. You can earn up to

30
00:01:35.439 --> 00:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>five percent on that stable coin and five point two

31
00:01:38.760 --> 00:01:41.760
<v Speaker 2>five percent on USBC. So if you do like to

32
00:01:41.840 --> 00:01:44.719
<v Speaker 2>learn more about Uphold and all the great services they offer,

33
00:01:45.079 --> 00:01:47.879
<v Speaker 2>visit the link in the description. Hey, folks, welcome into

34
00:01:47.879 --> 00:01:50.599
<v Speaker 2>the Thinking Crypto podcast. I'm your host Tony Edward, and

35
00:01:50.640 --> 00:01:53.519
<v Speaker 2>we are recording at Station three in New York's Financial

36
00:01:53.519 --> 00:01:58.159
<v Speaker 2>District and my guest is SEC Commissioner Hester Perce, Commissioner Perse.

37
00:01:58.159 --> 00:01:59.359
<v Speaker 3>Great to see you, Tony.

38
00:01:59.359 --> 00:02:01.159
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be you, know how I have to

39
00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>start my views and my own views as a commissioner,

40
00:02:03.640 --> 00:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily those of the SEC or my fellow commissioners.

41
00:02:06.680 --> 00:02:09.759
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, we've spoken many times over the years, so I'm

42
00:02:09.759 --> 00:02:13.240
<v Speaker 2>excited to be having this conversation with you now because

43
00:02:13.479 --> 00:02:15.879
<v Speaker 2>things have changed completely. It's a great time to be

44
00:02:15.919 --> 00:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>in the crypto industry. Lots happening in DC, lots happening

45
00:02:19.560 --> 00:02:23.520
<v Speaker 2>at the SEC. You're in town for a crypto roundtable?

46
00:02:23.599 --> 00:02:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

47
00:02:24.560 --> 00:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right. We've had a series of roundtables this year.

48
00:02:28.319 --> 00:02:33.159
<v Speaker 1>The first we're sort of issue oriented. We talked about

49
00:02:33.240 --> 00:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>things like what is the definition of a security as

50
00:02:35.840 --> 00:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it relates to crypto. We talked about custody trading. And

51
00:02:40.840 --> 00:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>now what we're trying to do is go out on

52
00:02:42.919 --> 00:02:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the road and meet with smaller projects that maybe wouldn't

53
00:02:45.759 --> 00:02:48.599
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to travel to DC and so trying

54
00:02:48.599 --> 00:02:49.719
<v Speaker 1>to hear their feedback.

55
00:02:49.840 --> 00:02:52.840
<v Speaker 2>So the roundtables, it sounds like you've got a lot

56
00:02:52.840 --> 00:02:55.719
<v Speaker 2>of good reception. Folks are engaging, they're talking and sharing

57
00:02:55.800 --> 00:02:56.919
<v Speaker 2>their thoughts and things like that.

58
00:02:57.319 --> 00:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we've gotten a lot of great reception, not only

59
00:02:59.680 --> 00:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to the tables, but also I put out a set

60
00:03:02.319 --> 00:03:05.719
<v Speaker 1>of questions in February and we're still getting great answers

61
00:03:05.719 --> 00:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to those questions. In so the feedback is really important

62
00:03:09.800 --> 00:03:11.319
<v Speaker 1>for us to try to figure out how to move

63
00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>forward in a way that's productive.

64
00:03:13.199 --> 00:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I got to give you your flowers, thank you

65
00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>for being a leader, and you know, having to transparency

66
00:03:18.639 --> 00:03:21.759
<v Speaker 2>and meeting with folks and some the small entrepreneurs and innovators.

67
00:03:21.840 --> 00:03:23.080
<v Speaker 3>So that's really great to hear.

68
00:03:23.280 --> 00:03:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Well.

69
00:03:23.520 --> 00:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, it's their giving of their time to

70
00:03:26.360 --> 00:03:28.319
<v Speaker 1>help us get to a better place, and I think

71
00:03:28.879 --> 00:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it's nice of them to be willing to do that.

72
00:03:31.960 --> 00:03:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Now, a good great segue it is into Project Crypto,

73
00:03:34.919 --> 00:03:38.039
<v Speaker 2>which was announced by Chair Paul Adkins and some of

74
00:03:38.120 --> 00:03:40.159
<v Speaker 2>the initiatives you're going to be doing there. Tell us

75
00:03:40.159 --> 00:03:42.759
<v Speaker 2>a bit about Project Crypto, what's the goal and some

76
00:03:42.840 --> 00:03:44.159
<v Speaker 2>of the recent initiatives.

77
00:03:44.719 --> 00:03:47.719
<v Speaker 1>The goal of Project Crypto is to really provide the

78
00:03:47.759 --> 00:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>clarity that the industry has been asking for now for

79
00:03:50.960 --> 00:03:53.919
<v Speaker 1>as long as we've been talking to each other and longer,

80
00:03:54.039 --> 00:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and so really to get to the place where someone

81
00:03:57.360 --> 00:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>who's trying to launch a crypto project knows what the

82
00:04:00.360 --> 00:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>possible avenues are to do that in a way that's

83
00:04:03.319 --> 00:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>compliant in the US. And so we've started out by

84
00:04:06.879 --> 00:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>providing some guidance. We're working the Crypto Task Force is

85
00:04:12.319 --> 00:04:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a set group of people at the SEC, but we're

86
00:04:15.159 --> 00:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>working with staff across the agency, and so you might

87
00:04:18.360 --> 00:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>have seen there are some guidance that's come out around

88
00:04:20.759 --> 00:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>things like meme coins around mining staking, and we're looking

89
00:04:25.839 --> 00:04:29.199
<v Speaker 1>at providing more working with the staff to provide more

90
00:04:29.199 --> 00:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of that type of guidance, also to bring that guidance

91
00:04:31.879 --> 00:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>up to the commission level where possible, so that it

92
00:04:35.120 --> 00:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>has a little bit more staying power, and then to

93
00:04:37.360 --> 00:04:40.639
<v Speaker 1>get to even more staying power, we're looking at writing

94
00:04:40.720 --> 00:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>rules where that's appropriate, working also with Congress on the legislation,

95
00:04:46.000 --> 00:04:50.439
<v Speaker 1>providing technical assistance there, and then looking at ways we

96
00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:53.959
<v Speaker 1>can provide exemptions for people who have specific things they're

97
00:04:54.000 --> 00:04:57.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. And so that's it keeps us very busy,

98
00:04:57.800 --> 00:05:00.199
<v Speaker 1>but that's kind of a little bit of what we're

99
00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to achieve.

100
00:05:01.040 --> 00:05:03.800
<v Speaker 2>And there's so much in the crypto space. I'm neck

101
00:05:03.839 --> 00:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>deep in it in the day to day, but it's

102
00:05:05.720 --> 00:05:07.199
<v Speaker 2>always something new, which is great.

103
00:05:07.240 --> 00:05:07.879
<v Speaker 3>It's innovation.

104
00:05:08.879 --> 00:05:11.199
<v Speaker 2>So I can can't imagine what it's like for you guys,

105
00:05:11.240 --> 00:05:13.439
<v Speaker 2>and you know, trying to figure out all these nuts

106
00:05:13.439 --> 00:05:16.399
<v Speaker 2>and bolts and components of this industry. You know, you

107
00:05:16.480 --> 00:05:21.360
<v Speaker 2>mentioned meme coins and liquid staking, excuse my ignorance on this.

108
00:05:21.480 --> 00:05:23.680
<v Speaker 2>So the guidance that you put out there, does that

109
00:05:23.759 --> 00:05:26.480
<v Speaker 2>automatically get added to like the Clarity Act and legislation

110
00:05:26.519 --> 00:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>that Congress is working on.

111
00:05:28.439 --> 00:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>No. What it does though, is it helps Congress focus

112
00:05:32.759 --> 00:05:34.639
<v Speaker 1>because we say, look, some of these things just are

113
00:05:34.680 --> 00:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not in our jurisdiction that we have. Now, if Congress

114
00:05:39.639 --> 00:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to give someone jurisdiction over those things, it can,

115
00:05:42.959 --> 00:05:46.439
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't need to. So it's really more of

116
00:05:46.600 --> 00:05:49.439
<v Speaker 1>just telling people out in the world who are either

117
00:05:49.519 --> 00:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>buying meme coins or who are issuing them that it's

118
00:05:54.240 --> 00:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not generally within our wheelhouse. Now, it's always important

119
00:05:57.319 --> 00:06:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, we're lawyers here. Well, I'm a lawyer,

120
00:06:00.680 --> 00:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>so facts circumstances matter. Yeah, And so you can take

121
00:06:05.040 --> 00:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>something that is not a security and you can offer

122
00:06:07.720 --> 00:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that it is a security, as

123
00:06:10.240 --> 00:06:12.959
<v Speaker 1>probably a lot of people in this space know. That's

124
00:06:13.000 --> 00:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of where the Howie test comes in.

125
00:06:15.399 --> 00:06:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and again another question where I think I'm very

126
00:06:20.759 --> 00:06:23.160
<v Speaker 2>curious about. So let's say meme coins are not securities.

127
00:06:23.160 --> 00:06:25.920
<v Speaker 2>But in every market there are bad actors. They're good

128
00:06:25.920 --> 00:06:27.800
<v Speaker 2>actors and bad actors people who come in and try

129
00:06:27.800 --> 00:06:30.759
<v Speaker 2>to take advantage of folks. So we've seen certain folks

130
00:06:30.839 --> 00:06:33.439
<v Speaker 2>launch meme coins and they do what's called a rug pull.

131
00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Is the SEC involved in that, or is a law

132
00:06:36.720 --> 00:06:38.639
<v Speaker 2>enforcement there are folks who have to handle that.

133
00:06:39.439 --> 00:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the reasons that we wanted

134
00:06:41.879 --> 00:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to put out this guidance is to say people need

135
00:06:45.040 --> 00:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to be careful out there because sometimes you are buying

136
00:06:49.199 --> 00:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>something that is not a security and then when something

137
00:06:52.959 --> 00:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>bad happens, you see people coming to the SEC and saying,

138
00:06:56.399 --> 00:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>can you help us, can you get our money back?

139
00:06:59.199 --> 00:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And if it wasn't a securities transaction, there's really nothing

140
00:07:02.120 --> 00:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we can do. And even sometimes when it is a

141
00:07:04.279 --> 00:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>securities transaction, the money is already gone. So I really

142
00:07:07.399 --> 00:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>urge people to be very careful to think about whether

143
00:07:10.759 --> 00:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they can afford to lose the money that they're buying.

144
00:07:12.839 --> 00:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>They're using to buy something, there's a lot of hype

145
00:07:16.279 --> 00:07:19.079
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of excitement. Yeah, doesn't mean that

146
00:07:19.120 --> 00:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to come away from this a millionaire. You

147
00:07:20.959 --> 00:07:23.319
<v Speaker 1>may come away from this having a lot less money

148
00:07:23.360 --> 00:07:25.079
<v Speaker 1>than you did when you went in. So people need

149
00:07:25.120 --> 00:07:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to be careful. But yes, when there are frauds, there

150
00:07:28.879 --> 00:07:32.079
<v Speaker 1>may be another government agency, whether at the state or

151
00:07:32.120 --> 00:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>federal level, that can go after those fraudsters. But it's

152
00:07:39.279 --> 00:07:42.279
<v Speaker 1>not always the SEC. I think sometimes people think whenever

153
00:07:42.360 --> 00:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>something bad happens in the in this general realm, that

154
00:07:46.439 --> 00:07:48.399
<v Speaker 1>it's the SEC and that's just not the case.

155
00:07:49.079 --> 00:07:52.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it's also finding that balance because I believe

156
00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>in the free market, you can go plate a lot,

157
00:07:54.759 --> 00:07:56.839
<v Speaker 2>or you can want you can go to vegas and gamble,

158
00:07:57.399 --> 00:07:59.639
<v Speaker 2>but you got to know, you've got to have self control,

159
00:07:59.680 --> 00:08:01.439
<v Speaker 2>you got to do your research, you got to be smart.

160
00:08:01.480 --> 00:08:04.399
<v Speaker 2>There's a responsibility to the individual, right.

161
00:08:04.319 --> 00:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, right. I think that's how the free markets work

162
00:08:07.560 --> 00:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and how this an environment in which we don't tell

163
00:08:12.720 --> 00:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you exactly what you can and can't buy. That means

164
00:08:14.920 --> 00:08:17.319
<v Speaker 1>that you do have to take that responsibility yourself and

165
00:08:17.639 --> 00:08:20.439
<v Speaker 1>exercise some judgment. And if you if you want to

166
00:08:20.480 --> 00:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>go have fun and you don't want to do your research,

167
00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but then the consequences might not be good.

168
00:08:25.360 --> 00:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, that definitely makes sense. Now, another big guidance

169
00:08:29.319 --> 00:08:33.440
<v Speaker 2>you folks provided was liquid staking. Certain liquid staked activities

170
00:08:33.440 --> 00:08:34.399
<v Speaker 2>are not securities.

171
00:08:35.240 --> 00:08:35.799
<v Speaker 3>That's huge.

172
00:08:36.039 --> 00:08:37.360
<v Speaker 2>You know. I've spoken to it of folks that like

173
00:08:37.480 --> 00:08:39.799
<v Speaker 2>lightoh and so forth, and they find this guidance to

174
00:08:39.840 --> 00:08:42.279
<v Speaker 2>be incredible. Talk to us about talk to us a

175
00:08:42.320 --> 00:08:46.200
<v Speaker 2>bit about the approach to liquid staking and the staking

176
00:08:46.279 --> 00:08:47.039
<v Speaker 2>marketing in general.

177
00:08:47.679 --> 00:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>The approach we're taking is that because it's really more

178
00:08:50.519 --> 00:08:54.519
<v Speaker 1>of a technical service than anything else, it doesn't make

179
00:08:54.559 --> 00:08:58.159
<v Speaker 1>sense for it to be within our ambit. When there's

180
00:08:58.320 --> 00:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>discretion that is involved, that sort of changes the dynamic.

181
00:09:02.240 --> 00:09:06.759
<v Speaker 1>But when it's more of a technical service, then that

182
00:09:07.080 --> 00:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't fall within the SEC's jurisdiction.

183
00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Got it.

184
00:09:12.080 --> 00:09:15.519
<v Speaker 2>There was recent news that members of the House, a

185
00:09:15.519 --> 00:09:18.799
<v Speaker 2>few legislators send I shouldn't say a few nine in fact,

186
00:09:19.159 --> 00:09:21.919
<v Speaker 2>send a letter to SEC Chair Paul Atkins about opening

187
00:09:21.960 --> 00:09:24.559
<v Speaker 2>up investments in four to one case, which included crypto

188
00:09:25.080 --> 00:09:26.759
<v Speaker 2>talk to us a bit about that. Is this also

189
00:09:26.840 --> 00:09:30.720
<v Speaker 2>in the general movement of relaxing accreditation laws and things

190
00:09:30.799 --> 00:09:31.159
<v Speaker 2>like that.

191
00:09:32.159 --> 00:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's been a realization that as the

192
00:09:35.240 --> 00:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>public markets have faced more competition frankly from the private markets,

193
00:09:41.080 --> 00:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>more activity is happening in the private markets, and retail

194
00:09:44.600 --> 00:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>investors are effectively shut out of those markets now, and

195
00:09:49.279 --> 00:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so there's been more interest in seeing if we can

196
00:09:52.000 --> 00:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to give retail investors access to

197
00:09:54.879 --> 00:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the private markets so that they can diversify their portfolios more.

198
00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:00.879
<v Speaker 1>And one way to do that would to open up

199
00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:05.039
<v Speaker 1>possibilities through your four oh one K of what you

200
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:09.159
<v Speaker 1>could invest in. Now again, people need to be careful, right,

201
00:10:09.240 --> 00:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>because if you're investing your retirement funds in something, you

202
00:10:14.320 --> 00:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>need to be thinking about how much money do you

203
00:10:16.159 --> 00:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>need in retirement, how much do you have, what's the

204
00:10:18.480 --> 00:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>risk associated? So people need to do that calculus. But

205
00:10:22.320 --> 00:10:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the idea is to get broader diversification to people who

206
00:10:25.919 --> 00:10:29.399
<v Speaker 1>are now really prohibited from diversifying.

207
00:10:30.039 --> 00:10:32.799
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like it's time. The technologies here, the

208
00:10:32.840 --> 00:10:36.720
<v Speaker 2>access to information and education. I mean, we have our smartphones.

209
00:10:36.759 --> 00:10:39.440
<v Speaker 2>We can go to Google and research things that you

210
00:10:39.480 --> 00:10:42.879
<v Speaker 2>know a couple of seconds. So I feel like the laws,

211
00:10:43.080 --> 00:10:46.799
<v Speaker 2>while they may fifty years ago, were in place to

212
00:10:46.799 --> 00:10:49.639
<v Speaker 2>protect consumers because you didn't have readily available information at

213
00:10:49.679 --> 00:10:50.440
<v Speaker 2>your fingertips.

214
00:10:51.360 --> 00:10:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Now it's completely different.

215
00:10:52.679 --> 00:10:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that is a very important point, which

216
00:10:55.480 --> 00:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is the information landscape has changed so dramatically, and so

217
00:11:00.840 --> 00:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it is fair to look at that again

218
00:11:04.039 --> 00:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and say, wait a minute, do the rules that were

219
00:11:06.360 --> 00:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>written And this is complicated, right, Some of this is

220
00:11:11.120 --> 00:11:14.039
<v Speaker 1>through judicial cases and things like that, so it's it's

221
00:11:14.279 --> 00:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a complicated legal landscape. But I think the information

222
00:11:18.279 --> 00:11:22.639
<v Speaker 1>changes that are out there and the accessibility is really

223
00:11:22.759 --> 00:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a factor we should take into account.

224
00:11:24.759 --> 00:11:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Absolutely.

225
00:11:25.679 --> 00:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course people have to be careful what their

226
00:11:27.519 --> 00:11:29.919
<v Speaker 1>information sources are. They have to do some vetting and

227
00:11:29.960 --> 00:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't just read one thing, look at look

228
00:11:32.639 --> 00:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for more information. We have a website investor dot gov

229
00:11:36.159 --> 00:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that has a lot of information that people can go

230
00:11:38.039 --> 00:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>check out as well.

231
00:11:39.600 --> 00:11:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I tried to do my best on my podcast, like

232
00:11:42.399 --> 00:11:44.799
<v Speaker 2>if you're joining a Telegra group, a Discord group, or

233
00:11:44.840 --> 00:11:47.360
<v Speaker 2>some guy and X sends you a chart, just do

234
00:11:47.480 --> 00:11:49.840
<v Speaker 2>your homework. Double check doesn't mean that that's accurate.

235
00:11:50.360 --> 00:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And you know the story is, if you're getting

236
00:11:52.559 --> 00:11:55.639
<v Speaker 1>someone who tells you to invest in is not charging

237
00:11:55.679 --> 00:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you anything for giving you advice, You've got to ask

238
00:11:58.080 --> 00:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>where is that person making make is money? Is he

239
00:12:02.200 --> 00:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>making it based on you? Or what is the source?

240
00:12:05.720 --> 00:12:09.519
<v Speaker 1>So always ask those questions. And if you don't get answers,

241
00:12:09.600 --> 00:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>or if you get told this is the last day

242
00:12:12.720 --> 00:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that you can invest, you can't take some time to

243
00:12:14.639 --> 00:12:16.919
<v Speaker 1>think about it. There'll always be something else you can

244
00:12:17.000 --> 00:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>invest in.

245
00:12:17.720 --> 00:12:18.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh for sure.

246
00:12:19.159 --> 00:12:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, speaking of options and investing, I want to talk

247
00:12:22.639 --> 00:12:25.279
<v Speaker 2>about all coin ETFs. We have a Bitcoin ETF and

248
00:12:25.320 --> 00:12:28.360
<v Speaker 2>an Ethereal METF in the market spot. Of course, folks

249
00:12:28.360 --> 00:12:31.960
<v Speaker 2>are wondering about XRP, Salon and other all coins. Recently,

250
00:12:32.200 --> 00:12:35.399
<v Speaker 2>the SEC approved gray Scales Digital Large Cap Fund, which

251
00:12:35.399 --> 00:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>is really great because that's a basket. Tell us about

252
00:12:37.639 --> 00:12:40.240
<v Speaker 2>the approach and any timeline you can give about these

253
00:12:40.279 --> 00:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>other ETFs.

254
00:12:41.399 --> 00:12:45.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, we just approved generic listing standards for a

255
00:12:45.559 --> 00:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>number of exchanges, which makes it much easier for these

256
00:12:49.759 --> 00:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>ETPs to get through the process at the SEC. There

257
00:12:52.720 --> 00:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>are multiple processes you have to get through, but this

258
00:12:55.799 --> 00:12:58.799
<v Speaker 1>really clears the way for that to be much smoother. Sure,

259
00:12:59.080 --> 00:13:02.759
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what people have been waiting for

260
00:13:03.360 --> 00:13:07.039
<v Speaker 1>to get access to some of these other types of ETPs.

261
00:13:08.600 --> 00:13:12.639
<v Speaker 2>When you're we've had this conversation before, is the process

262
00:13:12.720 --> 00:13:15.440
<v Speaker 2>still there needs to be a futures markets.

263
00:13:15.120 --> 00:13:19.879
<v Speaker 1>For it doesn't, And so I commend the people to

264
00:13:19.919 --> 00:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the generic listening standards and they can see

265
00:13:22.120 --> 00:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>that it's really a new approach.

266
00:13:25.159 --> 00:13:25.879
<v Speaker 3>That's really great.

267
00:13:26.039 --> 00:13:29.919
<v Speaker 2>So Okay, that's I completely missed that, even though I

268
00:13:30.000 --> 00:13:33.200
<v Speaker 2>read that the futures not necessarily need to be there.

269
00:13:33.200 --> 00:13:37.279
<v Speaker 2>So that's really great news for other all coin projects

270
00:13:37.279 --> 00:13:38.879
<v Speaker 2>out there that are maybe in the top ten or

271
00:13:38.879 --> 00:13:41.399
<v Speaker 2>fifteen that are very liquid and people want access through.

272
00:13:41.480 --> 00:13:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I expect we'll see more of those

273
00:13:43.519 --> 00:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>ETPs coming through under the generic standards. And that's not

274
00:13:46.679 --> 00:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the only way that you can get a product through,

275
00:13:48.799 --> 00:13:51.639
<v Speaker 1>but that's a more streamlined approach.

276
00:13:53.240 --> 00:13:54.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you can speak to this because

277
00:13:54.759 --> 00:13:56.799
<v Speaker 2>it's very kind of left field, but the folks at

278
00:13:56.840 --> 00:14:00.320
<v Speaker 2>rex ospray they use a different type of model.

279
00:14:00.320 --> 00:14:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I think the nineteen forties Act.

280
00:14:02.320 --> 00:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the ETF model Exchange traded fund versus exchange

281
00:14:07.440 --> 00:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>traded product, which is so exchange traded funds are a

282
00:14:10.759 --> 00:14:15.519
<v Speaker 1>subset of broader exchange traded products. Exchange traded funds are

283
00:14:15.559 --> 00:14:18.799
<v Speaker 1>regulated under the nineteen forty Act, and so there's a

284
00:14:19.240 --> 00:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a more intense regulatory framework there. Now. Again, I

285
00:14:23.559 --> 00:14:27.159
<v Speaker 1>really caution people when they're buying any kind of product,

286
00:14:27.240 --> 00:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an ETF or some other kind of ETP,

287
00:14:31.559 --> 00:14:34.639
<v Speaker 1>read the disclosure, think about what you're getting, think about

288
00:14:34.639 --> 00:14:39.519
<v Speaker 1>the risks associated Ask yourself, is this the right product?

289
00:14:41.000 --> 00:14:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Is it just an interesting product? Do I want to

290
00:14:43.320 --> 00:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>watch it for a while before I decide to buy

291
00:14:45.279 --> 00:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it make you know, use use your judgment, think about

292
00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it before you buy products.

293
00:14:51.480 --> 00:14:53.679
<v Speaker 2>A lot of folks are chomping at the bit waiting

294
00:14:53.720 --> 00:14:57.240
<v Speaker 2>for staking in the Etherorem's body. TF would liquid staking

295
00:14:57.279 --> 00:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>clarity provided by the SEC. Can we anticipate it and approval?

296
00:15:01.360 --> 00:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, Again, the way the process works is people have

297
00:15:03.759 --> 00:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to come in and ask, so, if you know, they

298
00:15:06.039 --> 00:15:07.879
<v Speaker 1>have to make decision about whether they want to have

299
00:15:07.919 --> 00:15:10.279
<v Speaker 1>a staking aspect to their product, and then they come

300
00:15:10.279 --> 00:15:13.159
<v Speaker 1>in and ask and we work with them around disclosures

301
00:15:13.200 --> 00:15:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and things like that.

302
00:15:15.360 --> 00:15:16.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you can speak to this because

303
00:15:16.679 --> 00:15:19.279
<v Speaker 2>it gets a bit into the weeds. But does it

304
00:15:19.320 --> 00:15:22.879
<v Speaker 2>make sense to add staking to the existing ets or

305
00:15:22.919 --> 00:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>create new ets podyts Let's say Etherorem as an example,

306
00:15:26.639 --> 00:15:29.080
<v Speaker 2>as a separate product, and once again that might be

307
00:15:29.159 --> 00:15:31.240
<v Speaker 2>outside the SEC's pew.

308
00:15:31.519 --> 00:15:35.399
<v Speaker 1>So your question is really on whether we need to

309
00:15:35.480 --> 00:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have change the existing products or come in and create

310
00:15:39.399 --> 00:15:42.799
<v Speaker 1>a new one. I mean, I think people probably will

311
00:15:42.799 --> 00:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>do both, you know. I think staking is something that

312
00:15:46.120 --> 00:15:48.759
<v Speaker 1>people have talked about as being a feature they want

313
00:15:48.799 --> 00:15:51.039
<v Speaker 1>to be able to have, and so I suspect that

314
00:15:51.080 --> 00:15:54.799
<v Speaker 1>some existing funds may decide to products may decide to

315
00:15:54.799 --> 00:15:59.039
<v Speaker 1>include that, and I expect there'll be new products. It's

316
00:15:59.039 --> 00:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>not really up to the s I think again, it's

317
00:16:01.360 --> 00:16:06.559
<v Speaker 1>really important to emphasize that the market decides what products

318
00:16:06.600 --> 00:16:10.159
<v Speaker 1>are available. People can decide whether they like them or not.

319
00:16:10.320 --> 00:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>They can decide whether the fees are high enough or not.

320
00:16:13.639 --> 00:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Our role really on a lot of these things is

321
00:16:15.879 --> 00:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>just to work with them on process and disclosure and

322
00:16:18.279 --> 00:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>things like that. And I encourage that the sponsors that

323
00:16:21.519 --> 00:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>come in that are working with us to listen to

324
00:16:24.360 --> 00:16:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the to the to work with the staff, and listen

325
00:16:26.720 --> 00:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to the staff's feedback on disclosures, because it no one

326
00:16:30.200 --> 00:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is better off if the investor buying the product doesn't

327
00:16:34.039 --> 00:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>understand what she's getting. So we want to get these

328
00:16:36.960 --> 00:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>disclosures right. You know, I really do urge people to

329
00:16:41.120 --> 00:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>engage in good faith on that process.

330
00:16:43.480 --> 00:16:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a bit about the disclosure aspect, because I've

331
00:16:46.320 --> 00:16:47.200
<v Speaker 2>heard this over the years.

332
00:16:47.240 --> 00:16:48.799
<v Speaker 3>I get it, but.

333
00:16:50.320 --> 00:16:52.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, it goes back to maybe like the Ripple case,

334
00:16:52.759 --> 00:16:56.039
<v Speaker 2>where secondary market sales were will not a security.

335
00:16:57.559 --> 00:16:59.240
<v Speaker 3>How do you I don't know.

336
00:16:59.519 --> 00:17:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to figure out how that all works. Is

337
00:17:01.840 --> 00:17:03.759
<v Speaker 2>it the exchange you still have to give a disclosure

338
00:17:03.759 --> 00:17:06.559
<v Speaker 2>that you sign up coinbase and you get a disclosure

339
00:17:06.599 --> 00:17:09.759
<v Speaker 2>for each of these assets, or a general disclosure that

340
00:17:09.799 --> 00:17:13.119
<v Speaker 2>you're entering the crypto field. Here are some things you

341
00:17:13.160 --> 00:17:13.519
<v Speaker 2>need to know.

342
00:17:13.920 --> 00:17:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, my comments around disclosures really went to

343
00:17:16.319 --> 00:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>ETPs because there are a lot of exchange traded products

344
00:17:19.400 --> 00:17:23.279
<v Speaker 1>out there, and you know, you have to do your

345
00:17:23.319 --> 00:17:26.039
<v Speaker 1>research when you're buying, whether it's crypto related one or not.

346
00:17:26.119 --> 00:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>You've got to think about what or work with a

347
00:17:28.240 --> 00:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>financial professional to help you decide what works for you.

348
00:17:32.599 --> 00:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>With respect to something like a crypto asset, if it's

349
00:17:35.920 --> 00:17:40.519
<v Speaker 1>not a security and it's not being offered into transactions

350
00:17:40.559 --> 00:17:45.519
<v Speaker 1>that security is offering, we do not have disclosure rules

351
00:17:45.720 --> 00:17:49.559
<v Speaker 1>that apply in that instance. Okay, Now, you could have

352
00:17:49.640 --> 00:17:52.799
<v Speaker 1>an exchange that decided to have a disclosure framework. You

353
00:17:53.200 --> 00:17:59.279
<v Speaker 1>could have and we've seen this right that there's some organic,

354
00:17:59.559 --> 00:18:02.599
<v Speaker 1>indisc re led effort to try to get better disclosure

355
00:18:02.680 --> 00:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>around tokens, and that doesn't have to be led by

356
00:18:06.119 --> 00:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the government. That can happen in another you know, just organically.

357
00:18:10.079 --> 00:18:14.400
<v Speaker 3>As I said, Okay, that makes sense. So let's talk

358
00:18:14.400 --> 00:18:15.359
<v Speaker 3>about the ripple case.

359
00:18:16.039 --> 00:18:17.079
<v Speaker 1>We can finally talk.

360
00:18:18.480 --> 00:18:19.480
<v Speaker 3>So commissioner parts.

361
00:18:19.559 --> 00:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>You know there's gonna be a lot of the XRP

362
00:18:21.640 --> 00:18:24.960
<v Speaker 2>army listening here. Why was this case brought in the

363
00:18:25.000 --> 00:18:27.960
<v Speaker 2>first place? Was it just simply it was the wildwist

364
00:18:28.039 --> 00:18:30.640
<v Speaker 2>days of the crypto market, the regulators, the industry, No

365
00:18:30.680 --> 00:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>one really knew what was going on, just that this

366
00:18:32.799 --> 00:18:34.759
<v Speaker 2>is a technology we're building, we're innovating.

367
00:18:35.200 --> 00:18:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Was that the crux of it.

368
00:18:37.000 --> 00:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, as I said at the beginning, I can only

369
00:18:39.279 --> 00:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>speak for myself, and since I didn't support the case,

370
00:18:42.680 --> 00:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not asking the right woman. Why we brought

371
00:18:45.680 --> 00:18:51.039
<v Speaker 1>the case again, it was part of a broader effort

372
00:18:51.079 --> 00:18:53.599
<v Speaker 1>that I was concerned about, which is using enforcement to

373
00:18:53.680 --> 00:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>try to write rules in a pretty difficult landscape. And

374
00:18:59.240 --> 00:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so what I think would have made more sense is

375
00:19:02.279 --> 00:19:05.519
<v Speaker 1>to think about how different projects were going about offering

376
00:19:05.559 --> 00:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>their tokens and trying to get to a world where

377
00:19:08.880 --> 00:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we did end up with better disclosure, but also where

378
00:19:13.039 --> 00:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>folks had the choice of whether they wanted to participate

379
00:19:17.000 --> 00:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>in these markets or not.

380
00:19:19.960 --> 00:19:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

381
00:19:20.559 --> 00:19:23.960
<v Speaker 2>What did you think about Judge Taurus's ruling secondary market

382
00:19:23.960 --> 00:19:26.319
<v Speaker 2>sales are not securities? But she also said, like certain

383
00:19:26.359 --> 00:19:30.319
<v Speaker 2>institutional activities that Ripple did were considered securities. Do you

384
00:19:30.359 --> 00:19:33.359
<v Speaker 2>think that's going to be eliminated so to speak, because

385
00:19:33.359 --> 00:19:35.720
<v Speaker 2>of the Clarity Act and things that are being put

386
00:19:35.759 --> 00:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>out by the SEC.

387
00:19:36.880 --> 00:19:39.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, her ruling was pretty nuanced, So I think

388
00:19:40.240 --> 00:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>from a lawyer's perspective, you have to look at the

389
00:19:42.480 --> 00:19:46.599
<v Speaker 1>nuance of that ruling. But I think that the point

390
00:19:46.640 --> 00:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that that case really underscores is that you can have

391
00:19:49.519 --> 00:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a token that is not itself a security, but is

392
00:19:53.519 --> 00:19:57.319
<v Speaker 1>offered in a transaction that is a securities offering, and

393
00:19:57.400 --> 00:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>so thinking about how that applies. I think that's really

394
00:20:02.359 --> 00:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>caused Congress and us at the SEC and others to

395
00:20:06.440 --> 00:20:11.079
<v Speaker 1>think about what kind of rules make sense here. Congress,

396
00:20:11.119 --> 00:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>as you said, has or is you alluded to, has

397
00:20:13.400 --> 00:20:18.039
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity now to write a new framework, sure, and

398
00:20:18.559 --> 00:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>so thinking about what kind of framework makes sense It

399
00:20:22.160 --> 00:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>will definitely be done in light of the cases such

400
00:20:25.039 --> 00:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>as Ripple and other cases.

401
00:20:26.640 --> 00:20:29.160
<v Speaker 2>So, Commissioner Purse, you mean the oranges in my house

402
00:20:29.240 --> 00:20:32.160
<v Speaker 2>right now the supermarket are not securities because.

403
00:20:31.920 --> 00:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Of how I'm going to say, they're not securities, but

404
00:20:34.160 --> 00:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you could still figure out a way to sell them

405
00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in a transaction that is the securities transaction.

406
00:20:38.759 --> 00:20:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, maybe I can tokenize it packages and say you

407
00:20:41.440 --> 00:20:46.200
<v Speaker 2>get ten percent return this year, right, all.

408
00:20:45.880 --> 00:20:46.799
<v Speaker 3>Based on the packaging.

409
00:20:48.279 --> 00:20:50.319
<v Speaker 2>So do you believe Do you think the how we

410
00:20:50.480 --> 00:20:54.759
<v Speaker 2>test gets updated or there's a new test for digital.

411
00:20:54.480 --> 00:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Assets, Well, we're we're watching in real time as law

412
00:20:59.559 --> 00:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is being developed, and what that looks like we don't

413
00:21:04.200 --> 00:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>know yet. I have long thought that the how we

414
00:21:08.359 --> 00:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>test it serves a very important purpose. Right. You need

415
00:21:11.960 --> 00:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to pull in these schemes that would not otherwise fit

416
00:21:16.000 --> 00:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>within the securities definition. Right, something where someone is saying

417
00:21:21.359 --> 00:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to you give me your money, will you don't have

418
00:21:25.200 --> 00:21:28.079
<v Speaker 1>to do any work, just I'll do the work and

419
00:21:28.119 --> 00:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>you'll get a return on the work that I do.

420
00:21:30.559 --> 00:21:33.319
<v Speaker 1>That is something the securities laws should cover, and so

421
00:21:33.480 --> 00:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure that out is important. But the scenarios

422
00:21:37.480 --> 00:21:42.599
<v Speaker 1>that then get put into the how we framework, reasonable

423
00:21:42.599 --> 00:21:45.559
<v Speaker 1>minds can differ on which scenarios should be shoved in there.

424
00:21:45.599 --> 00:21:50.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the reasons I've struggled in

425
00:21:50.400 --> 00:21:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the area applying how we in the area of crypto

426
00:21:53.839 --> 00:21:57.079
<v Speaker 1>is because it really is not like anything that we've

427
00:21:57.119 --> 00:22:00.559
<v Speaker 1>seen before, and so thinking about what makes makes sense.

428
00:22:01.759 --> 00:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>It's nice to be able to have this opportunity to

429
00:22:04.440 --> 00:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>do regulation now at the SEC instead of trying to

430
00:22:07.200 --> 00:22:10.599
<v Speaker 1>do this through enforcement, and then to work with Congress

431
00:22:10.640 --> 00:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on trying to come up with longer term legislative answers

432
00:22:14.240 --> 00:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>because we can really think about what does make sense

433
00:22:16.559 --> 00:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>instead of trying to analogize to other types of things

434
00:22:21.480 --> 00:22:23.599
<v Speaker 1>that maybe are not really that comparable.

435
00:22:23.960 --> 00:22:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, it makes sense. So again, excuse my ignorance

436
00:22:28.200 --> 00:22:32.400
<v Speaker 2>on this. Is it the Congress passes the Clarity Act

437
00:22:32.519 --> 00:22:35.640
<v Speaker 2>and then the how we test is updated by the

438
00:22:35.720 --> 00:22:37.119
<v Speaker 2>courts or the SEC.

439
00:22:38.039 --> 00:22:40.599
<v Speaker 1>So we don't First of all, the Clarity Act has

440
00:22:40.640 --> 00:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>passed the House, the Senate is working on its version.

441
00:22:43.240 --> 00:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what the what the end result will

442
00:22:45.200 --> 00:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>look like. We don't so we don't know yet how

443
00:22:47.480 --> 00:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this will work. But typically what happens with the legislation

444
00:22:50.599 --> 00:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>is that Congress says, here's here's the statutory framework, and

445
00:22:55.160 --> 00:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>now you agencies, whether it's SEC or CFTC or a

446
00:22:58.440 --> 00:23:02.039
<v Speaker 1>combination of the two, go right the rules to implement

447
00:23:02.119 --> 00:23:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the legislative framework, so that whole process can take a

448
00:23:04.839 --> 00:23:09.039
<v Speaker 1>little while. Then what happens is you might over time

449
00:23:09.319 --> 00:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have enforcement actions from the SEC or CFTC, or you

450
00:23:14.480 --> 00:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>might have you could have a challenge to the rules, right,

451
00:23:18.960 --> 00:23:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and so through those kinds of cases, typically it's through

452
00:23:23.960 --> 00:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>enforcement cases. The case law builds over time, and so

453
00:23:28.400 --> 00:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it can help elucidate the framework.

454
00:23:33.720 --> 00:23:35.480
<v Speaker 2>What are your thoughts on the Clarity Act and the

455
00:23:35.559 --> 00:23:38.039
<v Speaker 2>current status it's currently in the Senate? Obviously, do you

456
00:23:38.039 --> 00:23:40.160
<v Speaker 2>anticipate it's going to get passed and are.

457
00:23:40.079 --> 00:23:43.519
<v Speaker 1>You okay, I'm not going to predict what happens with legislation,

458
00:23:44.599 --> 00:23:48.799
<v Speaker 1>but I am eager to see what comes out of Congress.

459
00:23:49.400 --> 00:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been helpful to have the Genius Act

460
00:23:51.920 --> 00:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>for stable coins, and certainly we'll take whatever directives we

461
00:23:57.000 --> 00:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>get from Congress on the market structure side of things.

462
00:24:00.319 --> 00:24:03.039
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's important to emphasize that, as the

463
00:24:03.079 --> 00:24:07.519
<v Speaker 1>President's Working Group made clear, we and the CFTC have

464
00:24:07.680 --> 00:24:11.079
<v Speaker 1>authority already to do a lot of work. So there's

465
00:24:11.119 --> 00:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>certain things that are not covered by existing statutory authority.

466
00:24:15.160 --> 00:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>There's no regulator of spot crypto trading platforms, for example,

467
00:24:21.279 --> 00:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot that we can do under the

468
00:24:23.240 --> 00:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>authority we have, and that's really what we're trying to

469
00:24:26.279 --> 00:24:29.759
<v Speaker 1>do now in the lead up to whatever the legislative

470
00:24:29.759 --> 00:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>efforts are well.

471
00:24:31.440 --> 00:24:34.839
<v Speaker 2>I hope Q four. I just spoke to Congressman Tom Emory.

472
00:24:34.920 --> 00:24:37.759
<v Speaker 2>He's optimistic. We get it done Q four. And it's

473
00:24:37.799 --> 00:24:39.720
<v Speaker 2>a you know, we end the year, have a great

474
00:24:39.759 --> 00:24:40.680
<v Speaker 2>coach Christmas.

475
00:24:41.440 --> 00:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then it well, everyone else will and the

476
00:24:44.279 --> 00:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>agencies will be hard at work writing the rules to

477
00:24:46.440 --> 00:24:50.279
<v Speaker 1>implement the legislation. So we won't waste any time. We'll

478
00:24:50.319 --> 00:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>get right to work.

479
00:24:51.599 --> 00:24:53.960
<v Speaker 3>So you know you mentioned the CFDC.

480
00:24:54.440 --> 00:24:57.880
<v Speaker 2>They have the Crypto Sprint acting chair, Caroline fam He's

481
00:24:57.880 --> 00:24:59.720
<v Speaker 2>been doing a great job. How have you guys been

482
00:25:00.039 --> 00:25:02.640
<v Speaker 2>oberating and working together? Are you're meeting regularly and things

483
00:25:02.640 --> 00:25:02.960
<v Speaker 2>like that?

484
00:25:03.119 --> 00:25:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we meet regularly. The staff meets regularly. We're having

485
00:25:07.559 --> 00:25:10.839
<v Speaker 1>a big meeting next week actually on Monday, and that

486
00:25:10.920 --> 00:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>will be a joint SEC CFTC roundtable to discuss issues.

487
00:25:15.440 --> 00:25:17.599
<v Speaker 1>This is not just crypto. I mean, I think it's

488
00:25:17.599 --> 00:25:20.759
<v Speaker 1>important to note that a lot of the work that

489
00:25:20.839 --> 00:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we do that's not crypto related relates to the work

490
00:25:24.960 --> 00:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that the CFTC does, and so we'll be talking about

491
00:25:27.160 --> 00:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those issues. It should be a very interesting,

492
00:25:30.160 --> 00:25:31.799
<v Speaker 1>interesting day of discussions.

493
00:25:32.039 --> 00:25:34.039
<v Speaker 3>That's great. Great to hear the agency.

494
00:25:33.680 --> 00:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's what everyone can tune in. That's going to

495
00:25:35.960 --> 00:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>be a public, perfect event.

496
00:25:37.920 --> 00:25:38.559
<v Speaker 3>That's awesome.

497
00:25:39.440 --> 00:25:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about tokenization in twenty four to

498
00:25:41.480 --> 00:25:44.400
<v Speaker 2>seven markets commission on PERST because Brave.

499
00:25:44.200 --> 00:25:45.400
<v Speaker 3>New World almost.

500
00:25:45.640 --> 00:25:46.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I'm going to be up three

501
00:25:46.880 --> 00:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>am drinking coffee trying to trade markets, but maybe I'll

502
00:25:50.000 --> 00:25:52.079
<v Speaker 2>have an AI agent doing that for.

503
00:25:52.200 --> 00:25:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, maybe you know, your counterparts in Asia might be

504
00:25:55.880 --> 00:25:59.599
<v Speaker 1>trading overnight. So it's it's definitely something that could be

505
00:25:59.640 --> 00:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>interesting to foreign to foreign investors.

506
00:26:03.640 --> 00:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>So what are your thoughts on kind of the tokenization

507
00:26:06.160 --> 00:26:08.640
<v Speaker 2>race happening? Black Rock and all the Wall Street firms

508
00:26:09.119 --> 00:26:13.440
<v Speaker 2>not to mention crypto native companies, exchanges like coinbased cracking,

509
00:26:13.720 --> 00:26:18.359
<v Speaker 2>launching tokenized stocks. You know, Larry Fink said tokenization is

510
00:26:18.359 --> 00:26:19.279
<v Speaker 2>the future of finance.

511
00:26:19.319 --> 00:26:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Do you believe that?

512
00:26:20.039 --> 00:26:23.039
<v Speaker 2>And do you see by maybe twenty thirty we are

513
00:26:23.039 --> 00:26:24.559
<v Speaker 2>in a full twenty four seven market.

514
00:26:25.599 --> 00:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think there's there already is twenty four to

515
00:26:28.279 --> 00:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>seven trading, and I think there's a lot of interest

516
00:26:30.279 --> 00:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in that, So I expect that that will continue. Although

517
00:26:33.480 --> 00:26:36.599
<v Speaker 1>you may see it differ for different types of securities

518
00:26:36.640 --> 00:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>because there may be more concentrated liquidity during some times

519
00:26:40.480 --> 00:26:44.039
<v Speaker 1>of day for some securities versus others. Sure whether or

520
00:26:44.119 --> 00:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>not tokenization is the future. I mean, as a regulator,

521
00:26:46.920 --> 00:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I try to stay out of those kinds of prediction games.

522
00:26:52.160 --> 00:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's been a real as you as

523
00:26:56.200 --> 00:26:58.839
<v Speaker 1>you said, there's been a real interest not only from

524
00:26:58.880 --> 00:27:02.279
<v Speaker 1>crypto native firms, but from more of the traditional financial firms.

525
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And that interest I think was somewhat. I was expecting it,

526
00:27:09.519 --> 00:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but I wasn't expecting the level of interest that we got,

527
00:27:12.200 --> 00:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and it really was a reaction to the new regulatory

528
00:27:15.799 --> 00:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>openness at the SEC People said, hey, we've been wanting

529
00:27:19.759 --> 00:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to try tokenizing regular securities, and people have different ideas

530
00:27:26.039 --> 00:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>about how to go about doing that. And we're working

531
00:27:29.440 --> 00:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with people too, and we encourage people to come talk

532
00:27:32.039 --> 00:27:35.759
<v Speaker 1>to us before they start tokenizing, just to work with

533
00:27:35.839 --> 00:27:38.519
<v Speaker 1>us to see what exemptions they might need and how

534
00:27:38.559 --> 00:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to go about doing this in a way that's protective

535
00:27:40.759 --> 00:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of investors. I think, again, I'm going to bang the

536
00:27:43.920 --> 00:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>disclosure drum here, which is that if you are selling

537
00:27:47.400 --> 00:27:51.039
<v Speaker 1>something that you're categorizing as a tokenized security, you need

538
00:27:51.079 --> 00:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to be clear with people about what kind of security

539
00:27:53.960 --> 00:27:56.039
<v Speaker 1>it is, what kinds of rights they have, what kind

540
00:27:56.039 --> 00:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of risks they face that are maybe different from the

541
00:27:59.039 --> 00:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>risk of the security that you're trying to tokenize.

542
00:28:02.400 --> 00:28:04.720
<v Speaker 2>So is it needless to say that if I'm tokenizing

543
00:28:04.799 --> 00:28:07.000
<v Speaker 2>a stock, it's still a security because originally it was

544
00:28:07.039 --> 00:28:09.799
<v Speaker 2>a security. If I'm tokenizing goal a commodity, it's still

545
00:28:09.799 --> 00:28:13.039
<v Speaker 2>a commodity. But if it's offered up in a different way,

546
00:28:13.200 --> 00:28:14.039
<v Speaker 2>then it could become.

547
00:28:13.880 --> 00:28:16.759
<v Speaker 1>A security, and it could become a different kind. Even

548
00:28:16.799 --> 00:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>with a security that you tokenize, it could become a

549
00:28:19.200 --> 00:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>different kind of security depending on how you tokenize it.

550
00:28:22.440 --> 00:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you take it and you transform it somehow,

551
00:28:26.960 --> 00:28:29.839
<v Speaker 1>it might actually turn into a derivative, and there are

552
00:28:29.839 --> 00:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>different rules around how those can trade. So people really

553
00:28:32.279 --> 00:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>need to tread carefully here.

554
00:28:34.920 --> 00:28:36.680
<v Speaker 2>So how are you and the folks at the SEC

555
00:28:36.839 --> 00:28:41.359
<v Speaker 2>preparing for all this given that twenty four to seven markets,

556
00:28:41.400 --> 00:28:44.119
<v Speaker 2>but also these firms can open up these assets to

557
00:28:44.440 --> 00:28:48.000
<v Speaker 2>global investors. So because of the wallets set up in

558
00:28:48.039 --> 00:28:50.839
<v Speaker 2>the nature of smartphones, now, how are you preparing to

559
00:28:50.880 --> 00:28:51.480
<v Speaker 2>handle all that?

560
00:28:51.519 --> 00:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of difficult questions and we're working

561
00:28:54.400 --> 00:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>with people, which is again why we encourage people to

562
00:28:56.759 --> 00:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>come talk to us and think about you know, you

563
00:28:59.680 --> 00:29:03.119
<v Speaker 1>can sell something abroad, but if it's flowing back into

564
00:29:03.160 --> 00:29:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the US, there could be potential securities law laws implications

565
00:29:06.839 --> 00:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, even though you initially sold it

566
00:29:11.920 --> 00:29:13.799
<v Speaker 1>outside the US. So you have to think about all

567
00:29:13.799 --> 00:29:16.279
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of things. And I really encourage people to

568
00:29:16.839 --> 00:29:20.039
<v Speaker 1>do this carefully. If we do it right, I think

569
00:29:20.039 --> 00:29:23.039
<v Speaker 1>this could be a wonderful chance to see whether this

570
00:29:23.119 --> 00:29:25.759
<v Speaker 1>is where the markets want to go. But if we

571
00:29:25.839 --> 00:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>do it wrong and a lot of investors get hurt

572
00:29:28.640 --> 00:29:32.319
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't get the thing they thought they were buying,

573
00:29:32.960 --> 00:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>then we could destroy the market before it has a

574
00:29:36.519 --> 00:29:37.119
<v Speaker 1>chance to grow.

575
00:29:37.279 --> 00:29:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

576
00:29:37.440 --> 00:29:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

577
00:29:38.440 --> 00:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>You know. One of the things that are being discussed

578
00:29:40.240 --> 00:29:43.319
<v Speaker 2>is AI agents being able to use crypto assets like

579
00:29:43.319 --> 00:29:46.400
<v Speaker 2>stable coins to settle transactions. That's fine, but what happens

580
00:29:46.440 --> 00:29:48.839
<v Speaker 2>when an AI agent creates its own blockchain in its

581
00:29:48.880 --> 00:29:51.279
<v Speaker 2>own token. I don't know if we're going too far

582
00:29:51.279 --> 00:29:52.799
<v Speaker 2>ahead here, but what are your thoughts on that?

583
00:29:53.720 --> 00:29:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

584
00:29:54.000 --> 00:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there are going to be a

585
00:29:55.240 --> 00:29:59.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun questions for young lawyers to grapple with,

586
00:30:00.079 --> 00:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and some of those will be uh will be questions

587
00:30:02.680 --> 00:30:06.839
<v Speaker 1>that directly are relevant to the sec But I think

588
00:30:07.480 --> 00:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>people again need to be careful they and financial institutions

589
00:30:12.240 --> 00:30:14.599
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to use these tools. I think it's

590
00:30:14.640 --> 00:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>wonderful because I think there are chances to make the

591
00:30:18.759 --> 00:30:22.279
<v Speaker 1>financial markets more accessible to a larger group of people

592
00:30:22.319 --> 00:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>by having tools that make it cheaper to offer financial

593
00:30:25.720 --> 00:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>services to people. So we encourage people to experiment with technology,

594
00:30:31.519 --> 00:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but also to think about what the implications are and

595
00:30:34.559 --> 00:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and to you know, be mindful of the risks of

596
00:30:38.079 --> 00:30:39.039
<v Speaker 1>what they're creating.

597
00:30:39.960 --> 00:30:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a conversation I feel I'm going to have

598
00:30:42.559 --> 00:30:45.279
<v Speaker 2>with you for the next whileever long you're at the

599
00:30:45.359 --> 00:30:49.160
<v Speaker 2>SEC because I'm also exploring like AI agents and how

600
00:30:49.160 --> 00:30:52.079
<v Speaker 2>I can use them to help offer services to my

601
00:30:52.160 --> 00:30:55.559
<v Speaker 2>listeners and viewers. I don't want to create a token necessarily,

602
00:30:55.599 --> 00:30:59.240
<v Speaker 2>but the possibilities there. What if this, and again you

603
00:30:59.319 --> 00:31:01.359
<v Speaker 2>have a GI and all these things they get so

604
00:31:01.440 --> 00:31:02.559
<v Speaker 2>smart and sophisticated.

605
00:31:02.599 --> 00:31:04.319
<v Speaker 3>The collective IQ is.

606
00:31:04.279 --> 00:31:07.119
<v Speaker 2>Greater than all of us and the smartest minds in

607
00:31:07.160 --> 00:31:08.480
<v Speaker 2>the human minds in the world.

608
00:31:08.839 --> 00:31:09.240
<v Speaker 3>And there.

609
00:31:09.319 --> 00:31:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I am a little bit of a

610
00:31:10.839 --> 00:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>human maximalist because as interesting as I think this technology

611
00:31:15.480 --> 00:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is and as amazing as it is, the human being

612
00:31:19.680 --> 00:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is still the most and the human mind is really unrivaled,

613
00:31:25.400 --> 00:31:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and so I will always will always believe that you

614
00:31:30.920 --> 00:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>need somewhere to have a human in the loop. Human

615
00:31:37.319 --> 00:31:39.559
<v Speaker 1>jobs aren't going to go away because humans can bring

616
00:31:39.640 --> 00:31:42.599
<v Speaker 1>something that no machine can ever can offer bring, or

617
00:31:42.680 --> 00:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>no AI agent can of our bring.

618
00:31:45.799 --> 00:31:48.240
<v Speaker 2>So on that note, are you and the folks of

619
00:31:48.279 --> 00:31:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the SEC and the staff looking to leverage AI to

620
00:31:51.480 --> 00:31:54.480
<v Speaker 2>do your jobs, not replace you, but to make things

621
00:31:54.559 --> 00:31:57.039
<v Speaker 2>more efficient faster. You can send it out to go

622
00:31:57.119 --> 00:31:59.759
<v Speaker 2>review this token project, come back with the research, and

623
00:31:59.799 --> 00:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>then human takes over.

624
00:32:01.359 --> 00:32:01.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

625
00:32:01.640 --> 00:32:04.599
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. In fact, I was talking with someone about that yesterday,

626
00:32:04.680 --> 00:32:09.559
<v Speaker 1>about the ability of AI to do some of the

627
00:32:09.599 --> 00:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>tasks that that we SEC staff has done in the past.

628
00:32:14.279 --> 00:32:18.119
<v Speaker 1>It can enable us to review more disclosures, for example,

629
00:32:19.279 --> 00:32:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and then have the the ones that are have something

630
00:32:23.240 --> 00:32:27.839
<v Speaker 1>unique or unusual filtered up for for human level review.

631
00:32:28.400 --> 00:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>We do exams of firms that are registered with US

632
00:32:31.680 --> 00:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Investment Advisors, broker dealers s ROS. I think that that

633
00:32:36.359 --> 00:32:40.799
<v Speaker 1>AI can be very helpful in making us make better

634
00:32:40.960 --> 00:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>use of our enforcement personnel UH and and again get

635
00:32:45.160 --> 00:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>better coverage. So I'm quite excited about the possibility of

636
00:32:48.880 --> 00:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of AI to make us a better, a better regulator,

637
00:32:51.720 --> 00:32:54.839
<v Speaker 1>and and maybe even help us with consistency as as

638
00:32:54.839 --> 00:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a regulator, which is something that anytime you have an

639
00:32:58.000 --> 00:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>examination program or a disclosure review program you worry about.

640
00:33:02.759 --> 00:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>You want to have consistency so that like registrants or

641
00:33:07.279 --> 00:33:11.079
<v Speaker 1>like regulated entities are treated similarly. And so I expect

642
00:33:11.119 --> 00:33:12.559
<v Speaker 1>AI to be helpful there as well.

643
00:33:13.000 --> 00:33:14.960
<v Speaker 2>And going back to what we were talking about twenty

644
00:33:15.000 --> 00:33:18.160
<v Speaker 2>four to seven markets, maybe you have these AI agents

645
00:33:18.519 --> 00:33:21.400
<v Speaker 2>running twenty four to seven while you're sleeping and everybody

646
00:33:21.559 --> 00:33:24.359
<v Speaker 2>the staff is sleeping, they can be out there monitoring

647
00:33:24.359 --> 00:33:24.880
<v Speaker 2>the markets.

648
00:33:25.440 --> 00:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Sure, as long as it's as long as it's public

649
00:33:29.400 --> 00:33:31.799
<v Speaker 1>information I don't want to create. I think this is

650
00:33:31.839 --> 00:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we do have to worry about too.

651
00:33:34.960 --> 00:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>These new technologies have made it much easier for us

652
00:33:38.240 --> 00:33:44.799
<v Speaker 1>to exercise very comprehensive surveillance, but we also have to

653
00:33:44.839 --> 00:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>remember that there are some constitutional principles here about people's

654
00:33:48.960 --> 00:33:52.799
<v Speaker 1>ability to live their lives without having government watch their

655
00:33:52.839 --> 00:33:55.519
<v Speaker 1>every move. Now, if someone is if there's a reason

656
00:33:55.599 --> 00:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to suspect that someone has done something wrong, then we

657
00:33:57.920 --> 00:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>should go in and look at what that person has done.

658
00:34:00.160 --> 00:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't really want to be watching all your trading,

659
00:34:02.960 --> 00:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because I, as a regulator, have I have no right

660
00:34:07.279 --> 00:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to follow you around in the markets and to watch

661
00:34:09.280 --> 00:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>everything that you're doing in the markets. You might have

662
00:34:12.599 --> 00:34:16.639
<v Speaker 1>reasons for doing things that you don't want to have

663
00:34:16.639 --> 00:34:19.159
<v Speaker 1>have someone else seeing what you're buying and selling, right,

664
00:34:19.239 --> 00:34:21.679
<v Speaker 1>But then if you did something wrong, then that's the

665
00:34:21.679 --> 00:34:23.639
<v Speaker 1>point where we go in and we get the information.

666
00:34:24.079 --> 00:34:28.679
<v Speaker 1>So new technology is great, very helpful for regulators, but

667
00:34:28.719 --> 00:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>we have to exercise it responsibly.

668
00:34:31.800 --> 00:34:34.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well said, And to your point, maybe it's just

669
00:34:34.760 --> 00:34:37.679
<v Speaker 2>you put these triggers that if something looks unusual, then

670
00:34:37.719 --> 00:34:40.880
<v Speaker 2>it activates. It's not constantly moditoring like yeah, big Brother

671
00:34:41.039 --> 00:34:44.320
<v Speaker 2>or something exactly. Yeah, I want to ask you about

672
00:34:44.480 --> 00:34:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Dat's digital acid treasury companies. We've seen an explosion in

673
00:34:47.920 --> 00:34:50.639
<v Speaker 2>this This trend seems to be growing and it's happening

674
00:34:50.719 --> 00:34:52.719
<v Speaker 2>around the globe. But there seems to be a bit

675
00:34:52.719 --> 00:34:56.840
<v Speaker 2>of a bubble forming here from my perspective, but every

676
00:34:56.880 --> 00:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>market experience bubbles. What are your thoughts on these companies

677
00:35:00.079 --> 00:35:01.960
<v Speaker 2>adding crypto assets that are balance.

678
00:35:01.639 --> 00:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Sheet Again, it's not my role as a regulator to

679
00:35:05.039 --> 00:35:08.519
<v Speaker 1>tell companies what they should or shouldn't do. Sure, except

680
00:35:08.880 --> 00:35:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that when it comes to disclosing what they're doing, that

681
00:35:11.920 --> 00:35:15.119
<v Speaker 1>is in our wheelhouse. And if these are public companies

682
00:35:15.119 --> 00:35:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're this is big, this is this is

683
00:35:18.719 --> 00:35:21.199
<v Speaker 1>something they're doing, they have to be very clear with

684
00:35:22.119 --> 00:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in their disclosures about what the risks are associated with

685
00:35:25.000 --> 00:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing, what the you know, they can tell

686
00:35:28.400 --> 00:35:31.599
<v Speaker 1>people what they're why they're doing it, what the expected

687
00:35:31.800 --> 00:35:34.039
<v Speaker 1>benefits are, but they also really do need to be

688
00:35:34.079 --> 00:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>clear about those risks. And so that's what I'm really

689
00:35:38.039 --> 00:35:42.280
<v Speaker 1>focused on is is when there's any trend like this,

690
00:35:43.119 --> 00:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>people can get caught up in the excitement. But there

691
00:35:46.400 --> 00:35:50.039
<v Speaker 1>are still securities laws that do tell you have to

692
00:35:50.039 --> 00:35:52.280
<v Speaker 1>be very serious when you think through the risks and

693
00:35:52.360 --> 00:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>how you present them to investors.

694
00:35:55.199 --> 00:35:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Does it make sense, but the sec to put out

695
00:35:56.840 --> 00:35:59.679
<v Speaker 2>guidance on this or the existing laws covers I.

696
00:35:59.599 --> 00:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Mean, the intersting laws cover it. We have disclosure review

697
00:36:02.440 --> 00:36:06.119
<v Speaker 1>people who work with registaurants, whether they're doing a DAT

698
00:36:06.239 --> 00:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or some other kind of company, and so if people

699
00:36:10.440 --> 00:36:13.079
<v Speaker 1>have questions, they can reach out to our staff. Our

700
00:36:13.119 --> 00:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>staff will engage with them on thinking about how to

701
00:36:17.760 --> 00:36:20.159
<v Speaker 1>present these risks and things like that. So people can

702
00:36:20.360 --> 00:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>can engage, but maybe guidance will be necessary because, as

703
00:36:23.960 --> 00:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you note, it is it is quite a trend.

704
00:36:27.440 --> 00:36:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeah, everybody in their grandma is trying to do this.

705
00:36:31.159 --> 00:36:32.719
<v Speaker 2>If you're a public and trade a company, and do

706
00:36:32.719 --> 00:36:35.480
<v Speaker 2>you have these funds out there looking hunting for these companies?

707
00:36:35.559 --> 00:36:38.599
<v Speaker 3>Hey do this stock arbitrage? YadA YadA.

708
00:36:38.639 --> 00:36:40.559
<v Speaker 1>But you know, and when I see things like that,

709
00:36:40.639 --> 00:36:43.039
<v Speaker 1>I also ask is there is there something that we're

710
00:36:43.039 --> 00:36:46.159
<v Speaker 1>doing as a regulator that people are doing these kinds

711
00:36:46.159 --> 00:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of things in public companies instead of doing it in

712
00:36:48.360 --> 00:36:53.079
<v Speaker 1>a fund for example. And so those are questions to

713
00:36:53.119 --> 00:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>ask because you know, one of the questions you raised

714
00:36:56.280 --> 00:37:02.679
<v Speaker 1>earlier around staking in exchange traded products, that's something that

715
00:37:03.519 --> 00:37:07.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe companies are doing because they have more flexibility to

716
00:37:07.239 --> 00:37:09.679
<v Speaker 1>do it than they do in the exchange traded products.

717
00:37:09.679 --> 00:37:12.119
<v Speaker 1>So then you have to ask, is there regulatory arbitrage

718
00:37:12.199 --> 00:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>going on here? Yeah? I'm not weighing in on that

719
00:37:15.480 --> 00:37:18.039
<v Speaker 1>question here. I'm just saying that it's something that we

720
00:37:18.079 --> 00:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>should always be thinking about.

721
00:37:21.440 --> 00:37:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I've interviewed a few folks from the DATS and yes,

722
00:37:23.920 --> 00:37:26.480
<v Speaker 2>some of them have made the case, hey why put

723
00:37:26.519 --> 00:37:29.039
<v Speaker 2>your money in this body? TF bring it to the

724
00:37:29.119 --> 00:37:32.880
<v Speaker 2>dat get the stock these staking rewards that reinvested, or

725
00:37:32.920 --> 00:37:35.559
<v Speaker 2>you get a dividend. They made that case, but I

726
00:37:35.559 --> 00:37:38.039
<v Speaker 2>think as soon as the SEC approves staking and ets,

727
00:37:38.320 --> 00:37:40.039
<v Speaker 2>you know, they'll lose a bit of that thunder.

728
00:37:42.199 --> 00:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not weighing in. We'll see what happens.

729
00:37:46.719 --> 00:37:49.400
<v Speaker 2>You know. Go back to the bubble item. I want

730
00:37:49.400 --> 00:37:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to get your perspective on this, and again, every market.

731
00:37:52.360 --> 00:37:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to preface this because then I wanted to

732
00:37:53.800 --> 00:37:55.880
<v Speaker 2>seem like it's crypto. We saw a real estate bubble,

733
00:37:55.920 --> 00:37:59.519
<v Speaker 2>we saw a dot com boom bubble. I believe in

734
00:37:59.519 --> 00:38:02.159
<v Speaker 2>the frame mark. But does a regulator play a part

735
00:38:02.280 --> 00:38:08.000
<v Speaker 2>in saying, hey, there's some red flags here we need

736
00:38:08.000 --> 00:38:10.360
<v Speaker 2>to step into. I know that's a fine line.

737
00:38:11.280 --> 00:38:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's just not a job that Congress gave us.

738
00:38:13.679 --> 00:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>They did not tell us to tell people what to

739
00:38:17.079 --> 00:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>invest in. They told us go help people figure out

740
00:38:21.320 --> 00:38:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what they're buying by working with public companies and with

741
00:38:26.719 --> 00:38:30.559
<v Speaker 1>investment companies. So exchange traded funds and mutual funds on

742
00:38:30.639 --> 00:38:35.760
<v Speaker 1>their disclosure, and then go regulate the financial professionals that

743
00:38:35.840 --> 00:38:39.679
<v Speaker 1>help people invest in these things. Sure, but I think

744
00:38:39.760 --> 00:38:45.079
<v Speaker 1>there is a very important lesson that people time and

745
00:38:45.119 --> 00:38:52.159
<v Speaker 1>again forget, which is you know, making money comes with risks, right,

746
00:38:52.239 --> 00:38:55.039
<v Speaker 1>and so you can't just assume that the market is

747
00:38:55.079 --> 00:38:57.119
<v Speaker 1>always going to go up. You can't always assume that

748
00:38:57.239 --> 00:38:59.559
<v Speaker 1>anything you buy is going to go up. You can't

749
00:38:59.559 --> 00:39:02.320
<v Speaker 1>assume that the money you put into something will come out.

750
00:39:02.360 --> 00:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And so you have to think about your own financial

751
00:39:05.400 --> 00:39:10.079
<v Speaker 1>portfolio in terms of what your risk tolerance is. When

752
00:39:10.119 --> 00:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are you going to need that money? Are you trying

753
00:39:12.000 --> 00:39:15.079
<v Speaker 1>to buy a house next month? Then you know that's

754
00:39:15.119 --> 00:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>different than if you're trying to invest for if you're

755
00:39:17.440 --> 00:39:20.599
<v Speaker 1>trying to invest over a long period of time for retirement.

756
00:39:22.480 --> 00:39:24.159
<v Speaker 1>So you have to think about that. You've got to

757
00:39:24.159 --> 00:39:27.760
<v Speaker 1>think about what the mix of investments that you have are,

758
00:39:27.840 --> 00:39:30.559
<v Speaker 1>and you should you should be very careful about those

759
00:39:30.599 --> 00:39:33.280
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things because people can get hurt, and they

760
00:39:33.320 --> 00:39:36.159
<v Speaker 1>have historically gotten hurt when they get caught up in

761
00:39:36.199 --> 00:39:40.039
<v Speaker 1>the exuberance about things always seem to be going up.

762
00:39:40.800 --> 00:39:43.519
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think all of us have learned

763
00:39:43.519 --> 00:39:48.559
<v Speaker 1>that lesson somehow, some way, and those lessons stick, but

764
00:39:48.599 --> 00:39:51.440
<v Speaker 1>they can be very painful. And so if you want

765
00:39:51.480 --> 00:39:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to avoid that, learn from lessons that others have experienced

766
00:39:55.519 --> 00:39:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and don't go through it yourself and be careful about

767
00:39:58.280 --> 00:40:00.599
<v Speaker 1>how you manage your finances.

768
00:40:00.960 --> 00:40:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, it's almost like human beings though we

769
00:40:04.360 --> 00:40:05.280
<v Speaker 2>can't help ourselves.

770
00:40:05.280 --> 00:40:06.760
<v Speaker 3>We're speculative beings.

771
00:40:07.559 --> 00:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>We are right and and there's nothing inherently wrong with it.

772
00:40:11.360 --> 00:40:13.559
<v Speaker 1>It's just that you've got to know your own limits

773
00:40:13.679 --> 00:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and your risk level, and you have to be a

774
00:40:16.480 --> 00:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit you know, realistic. I have to laugh because

775
00:40:21.119 --> 00:40:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I was telling my young niece at the time, she

776
00:40:23.519 --> 00:40:27.679
<v Speaker 1>was quite young, five, and I was telling her about

777
00:40:27.679 --> 00:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>housing bubbles, and she said she thought it was very funny.

778
00:40:31.840 --> 00:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>She just thought that that way of describing it was

779
00:40:35.119 --> 00:40:38.079
<v Speaker 1>very funny, you know. And she said, well, who gets

780
00:40:38.119 --> 00:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>caught in housing bubbles ant Hester And I said, well,

781
00:40:40.559 --> 00:40:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I do. I actually bought at the top of the

782
00:40:42.960 --> 00:40:45.679
<v Speaker 1>market and and I paid the price for that, right,

783
00:40:45.760 --> 00:40:50.519
<v Speaker 1>And so I think people, you know, they they really

784
00:40:50.559 --> 00:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>have to have to go into this soberly.

785
00:40:53.519 --> 00:40:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I always tell people, also, look, do your best

786
00:40:57.360 --> 00:41:00.280
<v Speaker 2>to avoid leverage and have a long term view because

787
00:41:00.760 --> 00:41:03.519
<v Speaker 2>leverage also, you know, that's one of the big things

788
00:41:03.519 --> 00:41:04.960
<v Speaker 2>people try to get their fast buck.

789
00:41:05.360 --> 00:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people need to be very careful of that.

790
00:41:07.360 --> 00:41:09.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think we saw that in the in the

791
00:41:09.920 --> 00:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto you know years of the past right where people

792
00:41:14.039 --> 00:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>really got caught by leverage and the and you know,

793
00:41:17.760 --> 00:41:20.079
<v Speaker 1>there are other basic things like know who your counter

794
00:41:20.159 --> 00:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>party is, Understand what the counterparty is doing with the

795
00:41:23.400 --> 00:41:28.119
<v Speaker 1>assets you entrust to that person. What happens if if

796
00:41:28.159 --> 00:41:31.039
<v Speaker 1>that person that you're interacting with goes bankrupt? Do you

797
00:41:31.039 --> 00:41:34.119
<v Speaker 1>get your stuff back? Does someone else get it? Do

798
00:41:34.199 --> 00:41:37.039
<v Speaker 1>the creditors take it? And so these are questions that

799
00:41:38.039 --> 00:41:41.119
<v Speaker 1>regular people who are making the decision to invest should ask,

800
00:41:41.440 --> 00:41:44.119
<v Speaker 1>their questions that we as regulators have to ask. We're

801
00:41:44.239 --> 00:41:48.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to come up with a framework that does protect people,

802
00:41:48.239 --> 00:41:52.079
<v Speaker 1>but protections really differ depending on what market you're in,

803
00:41:52.639 --> 00:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what assets you're buying, and so people need to be

804
00:41:55.840 --> 00:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>quite careful about understanding that. Don't only think think about

805
00:42:00.360 --> 00:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens on the good days, think about what happens

806
00:42:02.480 --> 00:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>on the bad days.

807
00:42:03.519 --> 00:42:04.159
<v Speaker 3>For sure.

808
00:42:05.599 --> 00:42:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I forgot to ask you about the Genius Act and

809
00:42:07.480 --> 00:42:10.119
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts on that passing and the implications on the

810
00:42:10.159 --> 00:42:12.400
<v Speaker 2>stable coin market. We've heard banks want to launch their

811
00:42:12.440 --> 00:42:15.440
<v Speaker 2>own stable coins. Is the SEC involved in any part

812
00:42:15.480 --> 00:42:18.280
<v Speaker 2>of that or is it specifically like the yield bearing

813
00:42:18.360 --> 00:42:19.039
<v Speaker 2>aspect of it.

814
00:42:20.039 --> 00:42:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, the SEC is involved in the sense that I

815
00:42:22.320 --> 00:42:24.599
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the entities we regulate will want

816
00:42:24.639 --> 00:42:29.039
<v Speaker 1>to make stable coins available for their customers and so

817
00:42:29.280 --> 00:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how they can do that in a way

818
00:42:31.239 --> 00:42:35.599
<v Speaker 1>that's compliant. Tokenized money market funds or something that have

819
00:42:35.719 --> 00:42:38.679
<v Speaker 1>been around for some time. They're not stable coins, but

820
00:42:39.519 --> 00:42:41.639
<v Speaker 1>that is an area that we do regulate, and we've

821
00:42:41.679 --> 00:42:45.039
<v Speaker 1>been working with people who have tried to tokenize money

822
00:42:45.039 --> 00:42:49.039
<v Speaker 1>market funds now for quite a few years, and so

823
00:42:50.199 --> 00:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I expect more interest in that area. People can maybe

824
00:42:54.119 --> 00:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>use those for collateral and things like that, and then

825
00:42:57.559 --> 00:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I expect that any kind of you know, when there's

826
00:43:00.880 --> 00:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a yield bearing component to it, people ought to come

827
00:43:03.920 --> 00:43:06.719
<v Speaker 1>in and think about whether it's a security or not.

828
00:43:07.000 --> 00:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>That starts to look a lot more like a security.

829
00:43:09.480 --> 00:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We did put out guidance on stable coins to say,

830
00:43:15.000 --> 00:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the non yield bearing type of the type

831
00:43:17.719 --> 00:43:20.039
<v Speaker 1>that are at issue and the Genius Act they're not

832
00:43:20.119 --> 00:43:23.639
<v Speaker 1>within our remit. That's what the Genius Act said that

833
00:43:23.719 --> 00:43:27.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. So those are banking those are banking regulatory issues.

834
00:43:27.920 --> 00:43:30.679
<v Speaker 1>But there will be a lot of interaction, I think

835
00:43:30.719 --> 00:43:33.800
<v Speaker 1>between stable coins and the markets that we regulate.

836
00:43:35.719 --> 00:43:38.079
<v Speaker 2>Question just came to mind, and I don't know this

837
00:43:38.119 --> 00:43:39.960
<v Speaker 2>in walls the sec or not, but I love to

838
00:43:39.960 --> 00:43:40.599
<v Speaker 2>get your thoughts.

839
00:43:41.199 --> 00:43:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Would these big trad fi institutions coming in bank stock exchanges.

840
00:43:45.239 --> 00:43:48.079
<v Speaker 2>There's obviously a competition happening with the crypto native startups,

841
00:43:48.079 --> 00:43:50.599
<v Speaker 2>and how do you find that balance or it's the

842
00:43:50.639 --> 00:43:51.960
<v Speaker 2>free market and whoever wins.

843
00:43:52.440 --> 00:43:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're definitely getting a lot of input from traditional

844
00:43:57.320 --> 00:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>financial firms that are saying, don't give the crypto native

845
00:44:01.920 --> 00:44:05.280
<v Speaker 1>firms special treatment, and so I think really the goal

846
00:44:05.480 --> 00:44:10.519
<v Speaker 1>is to look at what the regulatory impediments are to

847
00:44:10.599 --> 00:44:14.519
<v Speaker 1>people participating in this area, to think about is there

848
00:44:14.559 --> 00:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a reason for that regulatory impediment or doesn't it make sense,

849
00:44:18.199 --> 00:44:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Which is why part of the regulatory the crypto regulatory

850
00:44:21.920 --> 00:44:26.559
<v Speaker 1>project will end up I think, having a larger effect

851
00:44:26.800 --> 00:44:29.119
<v Speaker 1>on the securities laws. It's not to say we're going

852
00:44:29.159 --> 00:44:33.639
<v Speaker 1>to rewrite the entire securities law book, but any time

853
00:44:33.760 --> 00:44:38.119
<v Speaker 1>you have a new technology or a new something new

854
00:44:38.199 --> 00:44:42.639
<v Speaker 1>like tokenizing securities, you start to ask questions about does

855
00:44:42.679 --> 00:44:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the rule we have in place make sense? Should we

856
00:44:46.400 --> 00:44:50.280
<v Speaker 1>move to a more technologically neutral rule, should we move

857
00:44:50.320 --> 00:44:53.679
<v Speaker 1>to a more principles based rule. Is this rule simply

858
00:44:53.719 --> 00:44:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on the books because no one bothered to take it

859
00:44:56.000 --> 00:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>off the books, and it doesn't even make sense for

860
00:44:58.000 --> 00:45:02.639
<v Speaker 1>traditional financial firms. And so we're definitely trying to work

861
00:45:02.719 --> 00:45:06.639
<v Speaker 1>through those issues in a way that's public, that allows

862
00:45:06.679 --> 00:45:11.639
<v Speaker 1>everyone to weigh in, and that doesn't give anyone special treatment,

863
00:45:11.840 --> 00:45:17.079
<v Speaker 1>but also allows people to experiment. And sometimes in order

864
00:45:17.119 --> 00:45:20.559
<v Speaker 1>to experiment, you're going to need certain exemptions, and so

865
00:45:20.800 --> 00:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to figure out how to craft those exemptions

866
00:45:23.440 --> 00:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in a way that makes sense.

867
00:45:25.360 --> 00:45:26.199
<v Speaker 3>It's fascinating.

868
00:45:26.639 --> 00:45:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm a macro viewer of human behavior and technology, and

869
00:45:31.920 --> 00:45:34.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious to see how this all plays out. As

870
00:45:34.199 --> 00:45:37.519
<v Speaker 2>you have like these goliads coming in, but these cryptonative

871
00:45:37.519 --> 00:45:39.280
<v Speaker 2>startups have head start.

872
00:45:39.440 --> 00:45:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, but I think, you know, I think it will

873
00:45:42.519 --> 00:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see how the competitive landscape shakes out.

874
00:45:45.519 --> 00:45:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

875
00:45:46.079 --> 00:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>One thing that has been fun for me to see

876
00:45:50.719 --> 00:45:54.519
<v Speaker 1>is that over the years, you see new entrants come in,

877
00:45:54.639 --> 00:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you see existing entrance, existing incumbents go away. That's a healthy,

878
00:46:01.840 --> 00:46:05.760
<v Speaker 1>dynamic competitive environment that we want to build. Now, I

879
00:46:05.800 --> 00:46:09.199
<v Speaker 1>actually think there's been less of that dynamism in the

880
00:46:09.199 --> 00:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>financial industry than is ideal because I think the regulatory

881
00:46:12.960 --> 00:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>barriers are higher than they have needed to be, and

882
00:46:16.519 --> 00:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's really trying to get that balance right. We

883
00:46:18.920 --> 00:46:20.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to put our thumb on the scale in

884
00:46:20.840 --> 00:46:25.840
<v Speaker 1>terms in favor of any competitor, whether incumbent or new entrant,

885
00:46:26.239 --> 00:46:28.639
<v Speaker 1>but we want to make sure that everyone can go

886
00:46:28.719 --> 00:46:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in and really fight it out there competitively, and that

887
00:46:32.679 --> 00:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not our rules that are preventing people from doing that.

888
00:46:36.679 --> 00:46:40.599
<v Speaker 1>So it's an exciting time when a set of new

889
00:46:41.400 --> 00:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of people who weren't normally in this sphere come in

890
00:46:45.400 --> 00:46:47.599
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, we might have a better way of

891
00:46:47.639 --> 00:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>doing things, and then we want to let them come

892
00:46:50.440 --> 00:46:54.679
<v Speaker 1>in and show us show the market. Is it really

893
00:46:54.719 --> 00:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>better or does the market prefer the traditional way of

894
00:46:57.880 --> 00:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>doing things. That's up to the market to decide.

895
00:47:00.199 --> 00:47:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well said you know something recently Sandy call Franklin

896
00:47:03.960 --> 00:47:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Templeton said which I thought was profound, that we're moving

897
00:47:06.800 --> 00:47:10.239
<v Speaker 2>away from the account based setup, total wallet setup. And

898
00:47:10.280 --> 00:47:12.039
<v Speaker 2>then you know, it's in line what we were talking

899
00:47:12.039 --> 00:47:15.639
<v Speaker 2>about with this race. I don't necessarily want to go

900
00:47:15.679 --> 00:47:18.000
<v Speaker 2>through JP Morgan anymore. If I can have my all

901
00:47:18.039 --> 00:47:21.360
<v Speaker 2>in one on chain, all in one super app has

902
00:47:21.360 --> 00:47:25.000
<v Speaker 2>my digital identity my crypto wallet, I could stay pay

903
00:47:25.079 --> 00:47:29.599
<v Speaker 2>with stable coins and all that biometrically locked in, cryptographic

904
00:47:29.679 --> 00:47:32.719
<v Speaker 2>and all that. You know, it seems like that's the

905
00:47:32.800 --> 00:47:34.880
<v Speaker 2>direction to Pucke is heading in. Obviously, it's going to

906
00:47:34.880 --> 00:47:37.400
<v Speaker 2>take time for the masses to get on board. But

907
00:47:37.480 --> 00:47:41.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious is the sec looking at it from that

908
00:47:41.719 --> 00:47:43.559
<v Speaker 2>perspective as well? People are going to go more wallet

909
00:47:43.599 --> 00:47:46.239
<v Speaker 2>base and move away from the traditional institutions.

910
00:47:46.960 --> 00:47:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's possible. I mean, we have a very intermediary

911
00:47:50.360 --> 00:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>centric system now. No people can buy financial products and

912
00:47:56.920 --> 00:48:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they can buy securities without going through inter mediaries, but

913
00:48:00.840 --> 00:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it's typically the way that it's done. So that will

914
00:48:05.360 --> 00:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>be quite a switch if we end up in a

915
00:48:07.320 --> 00:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>world like that. But I think we have to be

916
00:48:11.000 --> 00:48:16.480
<v Speaker 1>flexible and try mean, the goal should be to make

917
00:48:16.519 --> 00:48:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory framework work for how people want to live

918
00:48:20.239 --> 00:48:26.159
<v Speaker 1>sure and so that's if investors. If that is the future,

919
00:48:26.199 --> 00:48:29.800
<v Speaker 1>then investors want where everything is in one place. That's

920
00:48:29.960 --> 00:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>what we should work on. We're thinking of that some

921
00:48:32.920 --> 00:48:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in connection with this sort of super app idea, which

922
00:48:35.400 --> 00:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is that you should be able to you know, we

923
00:48:38.480 --> 00:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't add requirements to have to get lots of new licenses.

924
00:48:44.000 --> 00:48:48.079
<v Speaker 1>You should be able to access things through your broker

925
00:48:48.079 --> 00:48:49.840
<v Speaker 1>dealer if that's where you want to access things.

926
00:48:50.119 --> 00:48:50.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

927
00:48:50.960 --> 00:48:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's fascinating. We'll see how it all plays out.

928
00:48:54.239 --> 00:48:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious what twenty thirty looks like and what all

929
00:48:56.960 --> 00:49:00.800
<v Speaker 2>these technologies posts, crypto legislation being played, being in place,

930
00:49:00.840 --> 00:49:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and the innovation that comes from it. Okay, final question

931
00:49:05.039 --> 00:49:07.199
<v Speaker 2>here is something fun, Commissioner Perst.

932
00:49:07.199 --> 00:49:09.840
<v Speaker 3>If you weren't working at the SEC, what do you think.

933
00:49:09.599 --> 00:49:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Your ideal day job might be or what would you

934
00:49:12.400 --> 00:49:12.800
<v Speaker 2>be doing?

935
00:49:13.800 --> 00:49:15.519
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think I'm going to have to figure that

936
00:49:15.559 --> 00:49:19.119
<v Speaker 1>out relatively soon, So I guess I better. If I

937
00:49:19.119 --> 00:49:21.760
<v Speaker 1>could do anything and I could make money doing it,

938
00:49:21.760 --> 00:49:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably be a baker. But I'm not that great

939
00:49:23.760 --> 00:49:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of a baker. I just enjoy I enjoy baking bread

940
00:49:26.719 --> 00:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and cookies and cakes.

941
00:49:27.920 --> 00:49:31.119
<v Speaker 3>And you know it's funny. I'll tell you a funny story.

942
00:49:31.239 --> 00:49:33.519
<v Speaker 2>My seven year old daughter all of a sudden loves

943
00:49:33.559 --> 00:49:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Martha Stewart and watching her make cupcakes and so forth.

944
00:49:36.400 --> 00:49:38.679
<v Speaker 2>And she's been into that, so I now know how

945
00:49:38.719 --> 00:49:39.559
<v Speaker 2>to make some.

946
00:49:40.280 --> 00:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>See that's good because you'll be able to get all

947
00:49:42.480 --> 00:49:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of her baking.

948
00:49:44.559 --> 00:49:47.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she loves it now. So it's fascinating how that.

949
00:49:47.360 --> 00:49:51.039
<v Speaker 2>It's funny how that works out. Commissioner purs always a pleasure.

950
00:49:51.400 --> 00:49:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for taking the time and like

951
00:49:53.119 --> 00:49:54.679
<v Speaker 2>I said, I want to give your flowers. Thank you

952
00:49:54.719 --> 00:49:56.760
<v Speaker 2>for all the thought, leadership and the great work you've

953
00:49:56.800 --> 00:49:57.360
<v Speaker 2>done over the years.

954
00:49:57.360 --> 00:49:58.119
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Thanks Tony.

955
00:49:58.159 --> 00:50:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I've enjoyed our conversations over the years.
