WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomie podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:26.879 --> 00:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>So I want you to just picture looking back to

8
00:00:29.199 --> 00:00:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a time when the universe was well essentially an infant,

9
00:00:32.679 --> 00:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>like less than a billion years old.

10
00:00:34.399 --> 00:00:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Right right, A very different place than it.

11
00:00:35.960 --> 00:00:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Is today, completely different. The cosmic web is just unbelievably

12
00:00:39.479 --> 00:00:43.200
<v Speaker 2>dense and volatile, and at that incredible distance, specifically at

13
00:00:43.200 --> 00:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>a redshift of five point seven, we are witnessing this

14
00:00:45.799 --> 00:00:49.759
<v Speaker 2>literal cosmic dance between two of the brightest, most violent

15
00:00:49.799 --> 00:00:50.960
<v Speaker 2>objects and existence.

16
00:00:51.439 --> 00:00:54.000
<v Speaker 3>It really is staggering. We are talking about the system

17
00:00:54.079 --> 00:00:56.920
<v Speaker 3>J twenty three seven four five three seven, which is

18
00:00:56.960 --> 00:00:59.719
<v Speaker 3>a confirmed spatially resolved dual quasar.

19
00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's the whole mission today to unpack what

20
00:01:02.719 --> 00:01:06.799
<v Speaker 2>these colossal engines actually are and how astronomers even prove

21
00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>they weren't just some cosmic optical illusion, which is a

22
00:01:09.280 --> 00:01:10.519
<v Speaker 2>huge part of this story.

23
00:01:10.599 --> 00:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh, absolutely, Proving what is actually real in the universe

24
00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:18.359
<v Speaker 3>that is just full of mirages is half the battle.

25
00:01:18.120 --> 00:01:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Exactly because when we talk about peering that far back,

26
00:01:21.079 --> 00:01:23.560
<v Speaker 2>it's not just distant trivia. It's a full on detective

27
00:01:23.599 --> 00:01:26.359
<v Speaker 2>story for you, the listener, about the invisible fabric of

28
00:01:26.359 --> 00:01:28.959
<v Speaker 2>the universe itself. But I just keep getting stuck on

29
00:01:29.000 --> 00:01:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the awe of the sheer distance.

30
00:01:30.799 --> 00:01:33.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you have to the improbability hears off the charts.

31
00:01:34.840 --> 00:01:37.680
<v Speaker 3>When we look at quasars at a red shift greater

32
00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:41.599
<v Speaker 3>than five, we are already looking at the rarest most

33
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>extreme objects in the early universe.

34
00:01:43.959 --> 00:01:45.599
<v Speaker 2>Just finding one is a big deal exactly.

35
00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:48.680
<v Speaker 3>So finding two of them, separated by just a few

36
00:01:48.760 --> 00:01:54.799
<v Speaker 3>kiloparsex locked in this violent gravitational spiral, it's basically absurd,

37
00:01:55.040 --> 00:01:57.120
<v Speaker 3>it really is. I mean, this is literally one of

38
00:01:57.239 --> 00:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>only two confirmed quasar pairs we have ever found at

39
00:02:00.480 --> 00:02:04.359
<v Speaker 3>a red shift that high. It forces us to completely

40
00:02:04.359 --> 00:02:07.879
<v Speaker 3>reevaluate our models of how fast these super massive black

41
00:02:07.920 --> 00:02:10.240
<v Speaker 3>holes were growing during the cosmic dawn.

42
00:02:10.759 --> 00:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>But there's a paradox here, right, because the whole hierarchical

43
00:02:14.560 --> 00:02:17.919
<v Speaker 2>model of cosmology, the idea of how structures assemble. It

44
00:02:17.960 --> 00:02:20.639
<v Speaker 2>basically says galaxy should be slamming together all the time

45
00:02:20.680 --> 00:02:21.479
<v Speaker 2>in the early universe.

46
00:02:21.479 --> 00:02:24.439
<v Speaker 3>That's right. The early universe was crowded, mergers were common.

47
00:02:24.240 --> 00:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, So if galaxy mergers are happening all the time,

48
00:02:26.759 --> 00:02:30.599
<v Speaker 2>why is finding two blazing quasars in a single system

49
00:02:30.719 --> 00:02:33.919
<v Speaker 2>so extraordinarily rare? I mean, shouldn't the sky be lit

50
00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:34.759
<v Speaker 2>up with these things?

51
00:02:34.960 --> 00:02:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, it comes down to a really brutal timing problem.

52
00:02:38.680 --> 00:02:43.879
<v Speaker 3>A galaxy merger is a slow, agonizing process. We're talking

53
00:02:44.280 --> 00:02:48.759
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of millions, sometimes over a billion years to actually complete.

54
00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Which is a massive amount of time, even on a

55
00:02:50.759 --> 00:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>cosmic scale exactly.

56
00:02:53.000 --> 00:02:55.759
<v Speaker 3>But the active quasar phase, the part where the black

57
00:02:55.800 --> 00:02:59.240
<v Speaker 3>hole is actually eating and glowing, that is highly transient.

58
00:02:59.280 --> 00:03:00.479
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't last long at all.

59
00:03:00.599 --> 00:03:03.840
<v Speaker 3>No, the supermassive black hole only it creates matter fast

60
00:03:03.960 --> 00:03:07.120
<v Speaker 3>enough to outshine the whole galaxy for a tiny fraction

61
00:03:07.199 --> 00:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>of that merger timescale. The duty cycle might only be

62
00:03:09.560 --> 00:03:11.680
<v Speaker 3>a few million, maybe tens of millions of years.

63
00:03:11.759 --> 00:03:15.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's kind of like having a spectacularly lazy, picky

64
00:03:15.840 --> 00:03:18.439
<v Speaker 2>eater of a black hole, right. It just sits there,

65
00:03:18.520 --> 00:03:22.400
<v Speaker 2>dormant until a galactic collision forcefully shoves this cosmic buffet

66
00:03:22.520 --> 00:03:23.360
<v Speaker 2>right into its mouth.

67
00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:25.479
<v Speaker 3>That is a very visceral way to put it, but yeah,

68
00:03:25.520 --> 00:03:28.599
<v Speaker 3>it's accurate. In a normal stable disc galaxy, the gas

69
00:03:28.680 --> 00:03:30.960
<v Speaker 3>is just orbiting smoothly. It's supported by its own rotation.

70
00:03:31.039 --> 00:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>You're not just falling in right.

71
00:03:32.599 --> 00:03:37.080
<v Speaker 3>It will stay in orbit practically forever unless something violently

72
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:40.000
<v Speaker 3>extracts that rotational energy. And that's what the major merger does.

73
00:03:40.199 --> 00:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>It provides these extreme gravitational torques. It disrupts everything exactly.

74
00:03:44.159 --> 00:03:48.319
<v Speaker 3>It creates these massive shocks, funnels unimaginable amounts of gas

75
00:03:48.400 --> 00:03:51.319
<v Speaker 3>straight down into the nucleus. But the accretion isn't smooth.

76
00:03:51.759 --> 00:03:55.039
<v Speaker 3>The gas piles up, the quasar ignites, and then the

77
00:03:55.159 --> 00:03:58.840
<v Speaker 3>radiation pressure from the quasar itself creates these massive outflows.

78
00:03:58.919 --> 00:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh right, the feedback. It basically blows its own food

79
00:04:02.000 --> 00:04:02.599
<v Speaker 2>source away.

80
00:04:02.639 --> 00:04:05.639
<v Speaker 3>Precisely, it chokes off its own shiel. It suffocates itself.

81
00:04:06.080 --> 00:04:08.639
<v Speaker 3>So to catch j two to three seven four or

82
00:04:08.680 --> 00:04:12.680
<v Speaker 3>five three seven with both super massive black holes actively

83
00:04:12.719 --> 00:04:15.439
<v Speaker 3>lit up at the exact same moment from our perspective

84
00:04:15.599 --> 00:04:18.639
<v Speaker 3>twelve point eight billion light years away, it's wise. It's

85
00:04:18.680 --> 00:04:22.040
<v Speaker 3>like catching two separate lightning strikes in the exact same photograph.

86
00:04:21.560 --> 00:04:24.759
<v Speaker 2>And because it's that incredibly rare, the initial reaction from

87
00:04:24.759 --> 00:04:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the scientific community wasn't just you know, popping champagne. It

88
00:04:27.600 --> 00:04:30.120
<v Speaker 2>was profound skepticism. People thought it was a trick.

89
00:04:30.480 --> 00:04:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh. The scrutiny was intense because when this was first

90
00:04:33.959 --> 00:04:37.160
<v Speaker 3>reported as a candidate back in twenty twenty one, observers

91
00:04:37.240 --> 00:04:41.759
<v Speaker 3>just saw two identical, incredibly bright dots separated by a

92
00:04:41.800 --> 00:04:44.639
<v Speaker 3>tiny fraction of an arcsecond. And when you see that

93
00:04:44.680 --> 00:04:48.519
<v Speaker 3>at redshift five point seven, the default assumption in astronomy

94
00:04:48.600 --> 00:04:52.120
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely not a binary quasar. The default assumption is

95
00:04:52.120 --> 00:04:55.480
<v Speaker 3>an optical illusion caused by strong gravitational.

96
00:04:54.920 --> 00:04:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Lensing, which we really have to unpack because gravitational lensing

97
00:04:58.360 --> 00:05:02.240
<v Speaker 2>is such a common imposter in deep space observations. It

98
00:05:02.319 --> 00:05:05.360
<v Speaker 2>forces astronomers to second guess their own eyes constantly.

99
00:05:05.519 --> 00:05:08.720
<v Speaker 3>It really does. General relativity tells us that massive four

100
00:05:08.759 --> 00:05:12.480
<v Speaker 3>ground objects like a galaxy cluster literally warp the space

101
00:05:12.519 --> 00:05:13.199
<v Speaker 3>time around them.

102
00:05:13.279 --> 00:05:16.519
<v Speaker 2>Right. It acts quite literally like a massive invisible glass

103
00:05:16.600 --> 00:05:17.319
<v Speaker 2>LEDs exactly.

104
00:05:17.399 --> 00:05:19.959
<v Speaker 3>So if you have a single solitary quasar way in

105
00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:22.199
<v Speaker 3>the background, its light passes through that warped space, time

106
00:05:22.240 --> 00:05:25.720
<v Speaker 3>gets bent, and that geometry can easily produce two or

107
00:05:25.759 --> 00:05:28.480
<v Speaker 3>even four separate images of the exact same quasar.

108
00:05:28.720 --> 00:05:31.079
<v Speaker 2>I always think of it like looking through a distorted

109
00:05:31.160 --> 00:05:34.480
<v Speaker 2>funhouse mirror, or like the curved bottom of a wineglass.

110
00:05:35.199 --> 00:05:38.199
<v Speaker 2>You hold up one candle, but through the glass it

111
00:05:38.240 --> 00:05:39.800
<v Speaker 2>looks like two distinct flames.

112
00:05:40.000 --> 00:05:43.319
<v Speaker 3>That's a perfect analogy. And because it's just a mirage

113
00:05:43.439 --> 00:05:46.639
<v Speaker 3>of the same object, the light from those two dots

114
00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:47.759
<v Speaker 3>will look identical.

115
00:05:47.959 --> 00:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Right.

116
00:05:48.199 --> 00:05:50.319
<v Speaker 2>Their spectrum match perfectly.

117
00:05:49.959 --> 00:05:53.519
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, their red shifts, their colors, everything matches, and the

118
00:05:53.639 --> 00:05:57.399
<v Speaker 3>degeneracy there the difficulty in telling them apart is just

119
00:05:57.920 --> 00:05:59.319
<v Speaker 3>notoriously hard to break.

120
00:05:59.519 --> 00:06:01.319
<v Speaker 2>But wait, I want to push back on that a bit.

121
00:06:01.439 --> 00:06:04.079
<v Speaker 2>If you're looking at two identical dots of light from

122
00:06:04.160 --> 00:06:07.920
<v Speaker 2>billions of light years away, and a literal cosmic funhouse

123
00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:10.959
<v Speaker 2>mirror can perfectly fake that image, how can you possibly

124
00:06:11.000 --> 00:06:12.519
<v Speaker 2>prove what you're looking at is real?

125
00:06:12.680 --> 00:06:16.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, in traditional optical astronomy, it's incredibly difficult because the

126
00:06:16.319 --> 00:06:19.680
<v Speaker 3>deflector galaxy, the lens itself might be completely hidden by

127
00:06:19.680 --> 00:06:21.360
<v Speaker 3>the blinding glare of the quasars.

128
00:06:21.439 --> 00:06:22.319
<v Speaker 2>It's buried in the light.

129
00:06:22.600 --> 00:06:24.439
<v Speaker 3>Right, So you look at the optical data. You see

130
00:06:24.480 --> 00:06:29.319
<v Speaker 3>two bright dots. You extract the spectra and their twins photometrically,

131
00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a lens system and a real binary look exactly the same.

132
00:06:33.199 --> 00:06:35.279
<v Speaker 2>So if you can't see the lens, you can't map

133
00:06:35.319 --> 00:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the distortion. It sounds like a total dead end.

134
00:06:37.600 --> 00:06:39.560
<v Speaker 3>It is a dead end if you only look at

135
00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:43.879
<v Speaker 3>the point sources. The rigorous burden of proof here requires

136
00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:46.519
<v Speaker 3>you to look away from the bright lights. You have

137
00:06:46.560 --> 00:06:49.639
<v Speaker 3>to look at the dark space between the quasars for

138
00:06:49.839 --> 00:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>physical interactions that a mirage couldn't possibly fake.

139
00:06:53.360 --> 00:06:56.319
<v Speaker 2>You have to find the physical wreckage of the collision precisely.

140
00:06:56.800 --> 00:07:00.360
<v Speaker 3>A gravitational lens will distort the background host galaxy into

141
00:07:00.360 --> 00:07:04.360
<v Speaker 3>smooth arcs or a ring, but it will never create localized,

142
00:07:04.439 --> 00:07:09.079
<v Speaker 3>chaotic asymmetric wreckage between two independent gravity wells.

143
00:07:08.920 --> 00:07:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Because a mirage doesn't leave muddy footprints connecting two houses exactly.

144
00:07:13.319 --> 00:07:15.639
<v Speaker 3>But to see those footprints you have to completely bypass

145
00:07:15.759 --> 00:07:18.560
<v Speaker 3>the brilliant optical light of the quasars. You have to

146
00:07:18.600 --> 00:07:21.680
<v Speaker 3>move to the far infrared and submillimeter wavelengths to see

147
00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the cold.

148
00:07:22.120 --> 00:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Gas, which brings us right to the smoking gun. This

149
00:07:25.120 --> 00:07:28.639
<v Speaker 2>is where the team led by minghow YU brings in ALELMA.

150
00:07:28.920 --> 00:07:32.120
<v Speaker 2>The Atacoma Large Millimeter Submillimeter Array.

151
00:07:32.199 --> 00:07:35.319
<v Speaker 3>Right, ALMA is the perfect tool for this. It's spatial

152
00:07:35.360 --> 00:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>resolution at submillimeter wavelengths is just unpreced in it. They

153
00:07:38.920 --> 00:07:41.199
<v Speaker 3>weren't looking at the black holes at all. They were

154
00:07:41.240 --> 00:07:45.240
<v Speaker 3>mapping the cold, neutral gas of the host galaxies.

155
00:07:44.879 --> 00:07:49.160
<v Speaker 2>And specifically, they were mapping the emission lines of ionized carbon,

156
00:07:49.319 --> 00:07:52.319
<v Speaker 2>which is noted as C two. I really want to

157
00:07:52.319 --> 00:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>dig into this because why map ionized carbon specifically? What

158
00:07:56.279 --> 00:08:00.160
<v Speaker 2>makes this exact element the perfect cosmic fingerprint here?

159
00:08:00.720 --> 00:08:03.879
<v Speaker 3>It really is a phenomenal diagnostic tool. It's tied directly

160
00:08:03.959 --> 00:08:07.800
<v Speaker 3>to how galaxies form stars. See in a galaxy, gas

161
00:08:07.800 --> 00:08:10.160
<v Speaker 3>has to cool down before it can collapse under gravity

162
00:08:10.319 --> 00:08:11.000
<v Speaker 3>to form a star.

163
00:08:11.120 --> 00:08:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Right if it's too hot, it just expands.

164
00:08:12.879 --> 00:08:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Exactly And when young massive stars are born, they blast

165
00:08:16.519 --> 00:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the surrounding area with ultraviolet radiation. That UV light hits

166
00:08:19.800 --> 00:08:22.800
<v Speaker 3>dust grains, ejects electrons, and those electrons bounce around and

167
00:08:22.839 --> 00:08:23.639
<v Speaker 3>heat up the gas.

168
00:08:23.839 --> 00:08:26.160
<v Speaker 2>So the star formation is heating the gas, which should

169
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:28.839
<v Speaker 2>stop more stars from forming. It needs a release valve.

170
00:08:29.199 --> 00:08:32.799
<v Speaker 3>It absolutely needs a release valve to radiate that energy away,

171
00:08:33.039 --> 00:08:35.240
<v Speaker 3>and carbon is perfect for this because it has a

172
00:08:35.360 --> 00:08:39.320
<v Speaker 3>very low ionization potential. Even in cold clouds, carbon gets

173
00:08:39.399 --> 00:08:43.000
<v Speaker 3>ionized easily by starlight, So those bouncing electrons hit the

174
00:08:43.039 --> 00:08:46.399
<v Speaker 3>ionized carbon atoms, exciting them. When the carbon atom drops

175
00:08:46.440 --> 00:08:49.279
<v Speaker 3>back down to its normal state, it releases a photon

176
00:08:49.399 --> 00:08:52.279
<v Speaker 3>at a very specific wavelength one hundred and fifty eight

177
00:08:52.399 --> 00:08:53.519
<v Speaker 3>micrometers ah.

178
00:08:53.639 --> 00:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>So that specific flash of light is the cooling process happening.

179
00:08:57.720 --> 00:08:59.919
<v Speaker 3>Right By mapping that one hundred and fifty eight my

180
00:09:00.039 --> 00:09:03.960
<v Speaker 3>chrometer emission, you are literally mapping the cold gas reservoir

181
00:09:04.240 --> 00:09:06.399
<v Speaker 3>that fuels the whole galaxy. And the best part is

182
00:09:06.759 --> 00:09:09.720
<v Speaker 3>at that wavelength, the light punches right through the dust

183
00:09:09.879 --> 00:09:11.559
<v Speaker 3>that blocks our optical telescopes.

184
00:09:11.679 --> 00:09:14.320
<v Speaker 2>It cuts right through the glare. So they point Alma

185
00:09:14.399 --> 00:09:17.000
<v Speaker 2>at the system, they look for that specific carbon signal,

186
00:09:17.039 --> 00:09:18.919
<v Speaker 2>and they find an absolute mess.

187
00:09:19.120 --> 00:09:21.919
<v Speaker 3>They found a massive tidle bridge. It wasn't just two

188
00:09:22.000 --> 00:09:24.519
<v Speaker 3>neat pools of gas around the black holes. There was

189
00:09:24.559 --> 00:09:29.519
<v Speaker 3>a physical, contiguous stream of cold interstellar gas stretched across

190
00:09:29.559 --> 00:09:30.639
<v Speaker 3>the space between.

191
00:09:30.320 --> 00:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Them, ripped out by sheer gravitational violence. But let me

192
00:09:33.759 --> 00:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>play devil's advocate for a second. Couldn't a skeptic to say, well,

193
00:09:37.360 --> 00:09:40.679
<v Speaker 2>maybe the lens is incredibly complex, maybe a weird four

194
00:09:40.720 --> 00:09:43.919
<v Speaker 2>ground cluster is magnifying a background spiral arm to just

195
00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:45.039
<v Speaker 2>look like a bridge.

196
00:09:45.120 --> 00:09:47.879
<v Speaker 3>That is exactly the kind of rigor of the community demands.

197
00:09:48.200 --> 00:09:50.759
<v Speaker 3>But LMA didn't just give us a static picture. It

198
00:09:50.759 --> 00:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>gave us kinematics. It showed us exactly how fast the

199
00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:55.639
<v Speaker 3>gas in that bridge was moving.

200
00:09:55.440 --> 00:09:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Because of the Doppler shift.

201
00:09:56.879 --> 00:10:01.039
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. They mapped the velocity field and they found co plex, chaotic,

202
00:10:01.399 --> 00:10:05.000
<v Speaker 3>non circular motions. A lensed spiral arm would still look

203
00:10:05.039 --> 00:10:07.320
<v Speaker 3>like a spinning disc, just distorted.

204
00:10:06.840 --> 00:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>We'd have a neat orderly rotation.

205
00:10:08.919 --> 00:10:13.639
<v Speaker 3>Right, But this was total kinematic chaos. Yeah, definitively the

206
00:10:13.720 --> 00:10:17.000
<v Speaker 3>signature of two massive gravity wells tearing each other apart.

207
00:10:17.279 --> 00:10:19.679
<v Speaker 3>The optical illusion theory was officially dead.

208
00:10:19.840 --> 00:10:23.279
<v Speaker 2>Wow. So we are genuinely looking at two immense galaxies

209
00:10:23.279 --> 00:10:25.799
<v Speaker 2>and a death spiral and finding this bridge of star

210
00:10:25.919 --> 00:10:29.080
<v Speaker 2>forming gas just naturally leads us to the realization that

211
00:10:29.120 --> 00:10:32.480
<v Speaker 2>these black holes aren't just destroying things. Far from it, right,

212
00:10:32.519 --> 00:10:36.240
<v Speaker 2>They are residing in galaxies that are frantically creating new stars.

213
00:10:36.679 --> 00:10:40.919
<v Speaker 2>These are literal star forming factories. The ALMA data showed

214
00:10:40.960 --> 00:10:43.399
<v Speaker 2>that these host galaxies are incredibly massive.

215
00:10:43.480 --> 00:10:47.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh, they're behemoths. The dynamical mass calculations show that each

216
00:10:47.440 --> 00:10:51.639
<v Speaker 3>of these merging components is at least ten billion solar masses.

217
00:10:51.360 --> 00:10:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Ten billion at redshift five point seven. That is highly evolved.

218
00:10:56.159 --> 00:10:59.399
<v Speaker 2>We aren't talking about tiny dwarf galaxies bumping into each other.

219
00:10:59.480 --> 00:11:02.080
<v Speaker 3>No, these are assive systems. But the number that really

220
00:11:02.159 --> 00:11:05.039
<v Speaker 3>jumps out is the star formation rate. The data suggests

221
00:11:05.039 --> 00:11:07.679
<v Speaker 3>they are churning out over five hundred solar masses of

222
00:11:07.759 --> 00:11:09.600
<v Speaker 3>new stars every single year.

223
00:11:09.759 --> 00:11:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Five hundred a year. I mean, just to ground that

224
00:11:11.759 --> 00:11:14.200
<v Speaker 2>our own Milky Way produces what maybe one or two

225
00:11:14.279 --> 00:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>solar masses a year.

226
00:11:15.279 --> 00:11:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, about one to two. So J twenty thirty seven

227
00:11:17.399 --> 00:11:20.519
<v Speaker 3>four five three seven is operating in an overdrive that

228
00:11:20.639 --> 00:11:23.279
<v Speaker 3>is hundreds of times more intense than our own galaxy.

229
00:11:23.399 --> 00:11:26.360
<v Speaker 2>It's like an assembly line running at a dangerous frantic pace.

230
00:11:26.480 --> 00:11:28.120
<v Speaker 2>If you were floating in the halo of one of

231
00:11:28.159 --> 00:11:30.639
<v Speaker 2>these galaxies, the sky would just be a chaotic mess

232
00:11:30.639 --> 00:11:34.559
<v Speaker 2>of ultraviolet light from massive young stars blowing up in supernovae.

233
00:11:34.720 --> 00:11:36.639
<v Speaker 3>It'd be an incredibly violent engine of creation.

234
00:11:36.759 --> 00:11:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But I do want to push back on that

235
00:11:38.519 --> 00:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>five hundred number for a second, because the researchers explicitly

236
00:11:42.440 --> 00:11:47.799
<v Speaker 2>mention systematic uncertainties regarding dust temperatures. If our calculations rely

237
00:11:48.000 --> 00:11:51.639
<v Speaker 2>on assuming the temperature of invisible dust billions of light

238
00:11:51.720 --> 00:11:54.679
<v Speaker 2>years away, how wildly could these numbers swing.

239
00:11:55.240 --> 00:11:58.120
<v Speaker 3>That is a fantastic question, and it's a critical caveat

240
00:11:58.799 --> 00:12:02.200
<v Speaker 3>When we measure starform rates with alma in this way,

241
00:12:02.559 --> 00:12:05.240
<v Speaker 3>we are actually measuring the thermal glow of the dust, right.

242
00:12:05.279 --> 00:12:08.399
<v Speaker 2>The dust absorbs the starlight and glows in the infrared exactly.

243
00:12:08.759 --> 00:12:11.480
<v Speaker 3>And to calculate the total mass of that dust and

244
00:12:11.519 --> 00:12:14.519
<v Speaker 3>therefore the star formation, we have to assume a dust

245
00:12:14.519 --> 00:12:18.600
<v Speaker 3>temperature usually around forty five kelvin for these early galaxies.

246
00:12:18.639 --> 00:12:20.799
<v Speaker 2>But it's an underdetermined system, right. We don't have enough

247
00:12:20.840 --> 00:12:22.039
<v Speaker 2>data points to know for sure.

248
00:12:22.200 --> 00:12:24.519
<v Speaker 3>Right, we only have a few data points on the spectrum.

249
00:12:24.639 --> 00:12:28.320
<v Speaker 3>So what if the incredible radiation from the quasars and

250
00:12:28.399 --> 00:12:31.639
<v Speaker 3>the sheer violence of the starburst has heated that dust

251
00:12:31.840 --> 00:12:34.399
<v Speaker 3>up to say sixty five kelvin instead?

252
00:12:34.600 --> 00:12:37.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh, because of the stuff and Boltzman law, hotter things

253
00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:39.399
<v Speaker 2>radiate way more energy exactly.

254
00:12:39.440 --> 00:12:42.440
<v Speaker 3>It scales to the fourth power of the temperature. So

255
00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:45.840
<v Speaker 3>if the dust is hotter, you need significantly less dust

256
00:12:45.919 --> 00:12:48.519
<v Speaker 3>mass to produce the bright glow we see.

257
00:12:49.320 --> 00:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>And if there's less dust, there's less gas, and your

258
00:12:51.440 --> 00:12:54.679
<v Speaker 2>five hundred solar mass figure might be a massive overestimate.

259
00:12:54.759 --> 00:12:56.240
<v Speaker 3>It could be off by a factor of two or

260
00:12:56.240 --> 00:12:59.519
<v Speaker 3>three easily. On the flip side, if the dust has

261
00:12:59.519 --> 00:13:02.840
<v Speaker 3>a different mmical composition, maybe more silicates in the early universe,

262
00:13:03.600 --> 00:13:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the real rate could be even higher.

263
00:13:05.440 --> 00:13:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Are we looking at a conservative baseline or could we

264
00:13:08.399 --> 00:13:10.840
<v Speaker 2>be drastically overestimating the chaos.

265
00:13:11.000 --> 00:13:13.799
<v Speaker 3>We won't know the exact number without follow up observations,

266
00:13:13.840 --> 00:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe using the James Web Space telescope combined with deeper

267
00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:19.919
<v Speaker 3>Ala maps. But honestly, even if the rate is three

268
00:13:20.000 --> 00:13:23.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred instead of five hundred, the physical reality is the same.

269
00:13:23.200 --> 00:13:25.960
<v Speaker 2>It's still an extreme starburst system exactly.

270
00:13:26.000 --> 00:13:29.519
<v Speaker 3>The merger is violently compressing the gas, fueling the quasars,

271
00:13:29.720 --> 00:13:33.039
<v Speaker 3>and sparking a massive, rapid assembly of stars all at

272
00:13:33.080 --> 00:13:33.559
<v Speaker 3>the same time.

273
00:13:33.679 --> 00:13:36.759
<v Speaker 2>It's just spectacular. So we've established the massive scale the

274
00:13:36.840 --> 00:13:39.679
<v Speaker 2>violent waltz they're locked in. But this dance has a

275
00:13:39.679 --> 00:13:42.480
<v Speaker 2>grand finale, right, a finale that won't happen for a.

276
00:13:42.519 --> 00:13:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Very very long time, a very long time right now,

277
00:13:45.440 --> 00:13:47.200
<v Speaker 3>at the moment we observe them at rench of five

278
00:13:47.240 --> 00:13:50.759
<v Speaker 3>point seven, these supermassive black holes are still separated by

279
00:13:50.799 --> 00:13:54.200
<v Speaker 3>thousands of late years. They aren't a true binary system.

280
00:13:54.320 --> 00:13:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Yet they still have to navigate this incredibly chaotic, turbulent

281
00:13:58.279 --> 00:14:01.679
<v Speaker 2>soup of gas and star just to get to each other.

282
00:14:02.080 --> 00:14:03.919
<v Speaker 2>How do they actually close that gap?

283
00:14:04.200 --> 00:14:06.600
<v Speaker 3>The main driver at these large scales is something called

284
00:14:06.679 --> 00:14:10.039
<v Speaker 3>dynamical friction. As the black hole plows through the dense

285
00:14:10.080 --> 00:14:12.960
<v Speaker 3>background of the galaxy, it's gravity pulls on the stars

286
00:14:12.960 --> 00:14:13.799
<v Speaker 3>and gas around it.

287
00:14:13.799 --> 00:14:15.399
<v Speaker 2>It deflects their orbits.

288
00:14:15.120 --> 00:14:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, and as the black hole moves forward, it leads

289
00:14:17.639 --> 00:14:20.519
<v Speaker 3>to behind a localized cluster a wake of all that

290
00:14:20.559 --> 00:14:21.600
<v Speaker 3>material is just pulled on.

291
00:14:21.759 --> 00:14:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh so it's literally dragging a heavy tail of stars

292
00:14:24.399 --> 00:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>behind it.

293
00:14:24.960 --> 00:14:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, and the gravitational pull of that trailing wake acts

294
00:14:28.480 --> 00:14:32.360
<v Speaker 3>as a constant break. It SAPs the black hole's kinetic energy,

295
00:14:32.360 --> 00:14:34.919
<v Speaker 3>forcing it to slowly, relentlessly spiral inward.

296
00:14:35.200 --> 00:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>And the models say this dynamical friction process is going

297
00:14:37.879 --> 00:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>to take a staggering amount of time. For j twenty

298
00:14:40.320 --> 00:14:42.919
<v Speaker 2>three h thirty seven four five thirty seven, something like

299
00:14:42.960 --> 00:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>two point one billion years.

300
00:14:44.600 --> 00:14:47.799
<v Speaker 3>Right, It will take over two billion years for them

301
00:14:47.840 --> 00:14:51.440
<v Speaker 3>to finally become a gravitationally bound binary, which would happen

302
00:14:51.440 --> 00:14:52.360
<v Speaker 3>around redshift two.

303
00:14:52.720 --> 00:14:54.720
<v Speaker 2>But just getting to the center isn't the end of

304
00:14:54.759 --> 00:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the story. Once they get really close, like within a

305
00:14:58.120 --> 00:15:01.799
<v Speaker 2>parsec of each other, that friction stops working, doesn't it.

306
00:15:01.799 --> 00:15:05.320
<v Speaker 3>It does. It's called the final parsec problem. The volume

307
00:15:05.360 --> 00:15:08.559
<v Speaker 3>of space gets too small to hold enough background stars

308
00:15:08.799 --> 00:15:09.960
<v Speaker 3>to create that drag.

309
00:15:10.360 --> 00:15:12.399
<v Speaker 2>So how do they keep falling inward? Do they just

310
00:15:12.519 --> 00:15:13.120
<v Speaker 2>stall out?

311
00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:16.440
<v Speaker 3>If it were a dry merger without gas, they might stall,

312
00:15:17.080 --> 00:15:20.360
<v Speaker 3>But here they enter the hardening phase. The binary acts

313
00:15:20.399 --> 00:15:23.879
<v Speaker 3>like a giant gravitational baseball bat. Any star that wanders

314
00:15:23.879 --> 00:15:26.559
<v Speaker 3>too close gets violently ejected from the galactic center.

315
00:15:26.639 --> 00:15:29.039
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, it just slingshots stars away.

316
00:15:29.000 --> 00:15:32.039
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, and the energy to kick that star out comes

317
00:15:32.039 --> 00:15:34.799
<v Speaker 3>from the black hole's orbit. So they step slightly closer together,

318
00:15:35.320 --> 00:15:37.440
<v Speaker 3>but eventually they kick away all the stars in the center.

319
00:15:37.519 --> 00:15:38.759
<v Speaker 3>They run out amo.

320
00:15:38.600 --> 00:15:40.799
<v Speaker 2>Right, they clear out the whole core. So what bridge

321
00:15:40.799 --> 00:15:41.759
<v Speaker 2>is that final gap?

322
00:15:42.120 --> 00:15:45.679
<v Speaker 3>The gas? Because this is a very wet, gas rich merger.

323
00:15:46.360 --> 00:15:50.000
<v Speaker 3>The black holes are swimming in a massive circumbinary accretion disc.

324
00:15:50.600 --> 00:15:54.200
<v Speaker 3>The sheer viscous friction of that gas provides the drag

325
00:15:54.320 --> 00:15:57.279
<v Speaker 3>needed to push them down to milliparsec scales.

326
00:15:57.399 --> 00:16:00.200
<v Speaker 2>And once they get that close, separated by mirror light

327
00:16:00.240 --> 00:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>months and moving at a huge fraction of the speed

328
00:16:02.480 --> 00:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>of light, physics fundamentally shifts. General relativity totally takes over.

329
00:16:07.600 --> 00:16:11.279
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely at that point. The dominant way they lose energy

330
00:16:11.399 --> 00:16:13.759
<v Speaker 3>is by radiating gravitational waves.

331
00:16:13.559 --> 00:16:16.639
<v Speaker 2>Ripples in the literal fabric of space time, and this

332
00:16:16.639 --> 00:16:20.879
<v Speaker 2>connects our ancient red shift five point seven quasars directly

333
00:16:20.960 --> 00:16:23.519
<v Speaker 2>to the most cutting edge physics happening right now on Earth.

334
00:16:23.559 --> 00:16:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Because these aren't the quick, high frequency chirps we hear

335
00:16:26.200 --> 00:16:28.159
<v Speaker 2>from small black holes with ligo right.

336
00:16:28.120 --> 00:16:31.399
<v Speaker 3>No, not at all. A supermassive black hole binary takes

337
00:16:31.480 --> 00:16:34.799
<v Speaker 3>millions of years to inspiral. The gravitational waves they produce

338
00:16:34.799 --> 00:16:38.600
<v Speaker 3>have incredibly long wavelengths. We're talking nanohurtz frequencies.

339
00:16:38.200 --> 00:16:40.759
<v Speaker 2>So the wave takes years just to complete a single oscillation.

340
00:16:40.840 --> 00:16:42.960
<v Speaker 2>You can't catch that in a laboratory.

341
00:16:42.519 --> 00:16:45.279
<v Speaker 3>No, you need a detector the size of a galaxy.

342
00:16:44.960 --> 00:16:48.399
<v Speaker 2>Which is exactly what pulsar timing arrays are it's brilliant.

343
00:16:48.919 --> 00:16:52.720
<v Speaker 2>We use millisecond pulsars, these rapidly spinning dead stars that

344
00:16:52.720 --> 00:16:56.720
<v Speaker 2>shoot radio beams at Earth with perfect precision, like cosmic clocks.

345
00:16:56.960 --> 00:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>They are staggeringly precise.

346
00:16:59.039 --> 00:17:02.639
<v Speaker 2>And if a massive of nanohertz gravitational wave rolls through

347
00:17:02.639 --> 00:17:06.160
<v Speaker 2>the Milky Way, it actually stretches and squeezes the space

348
00:17:06.240 --> 00:17:08.160
<v Speaker 2>between Earth and those pulsars.

349
00:17:08.240 --> 00:17:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Right the distance the radio pulse has to travel physically changes, which.

350
00:17:11.880 --> 00:17:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Means the pulse arrives just a tiny fraction of a

351
00:17:14.680 --> 00:17:18.960
<v Speaker 2>microsecond early or late. And by monitoring dozens of these pulsars,

352
00:17:19.240 --> 00:17:22.640
<v Speaker 2>scientists act like a giant cosmic seismograph, listening for that

353
00:17:22.799 --> 00:17:23.799
<v Speaker 2>rumble exactly.

354
00:17:24.240 --> 00:17:27.559
<v Speaker 3>Groups like Nanograph have actually found compelling evidence for this recently,

355
00:17:27.880 --> 00:17:32.079
<v Speaker 3>a stochastic gravitational wave background. It's a constant, low frequency

356
00:17:32.160 --> 00:17:34.079
<v Speaker 3>hum vibrating through the universe.

357
00:17:34.119 --> 00:17:37.319
<v Speaker 2>It's the combine noise of millions of supermassive black holes

358
00:17:37.319 --> 00:17:40.480
<v Speaker 2>slowly spiraling together across all of cosmic time, like the

359
00:17:40.559 --> 00:17:43.240
<v Speaker 2>low rumble of distant traffic in a busy city.

360
00:17:43.359 --> 00:17:45.640
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly what it is. But here is the kicker.

361
00:17:46.200 --> 00:17:48.880
<v Speaker 3>The background hum they detected is actually stronger than our

362
00:17:48.920 --> 00:17:50.240
<v Speaker 3>baseline models predicted.

363
00:17:50.440 --> 00:17:53.359
<v Speaker 2>Wait, really, so if it's louder than expected, does that

364
00:17:53.440 --> 00:17:56.160
<v Speaker 2>mean our fundamental ideas about how crowded and violent the

365
00:17:56.240 --> 00:17:58.680
<v Speaker 2>early universe was have just been too conservative.

366
00:17:59.000 --> 00:18:02.079
<v Speaker 3>That is the leading thing right now. A louder hum

367
00:18:02.359 --> 00:18:06.400
<v Speaker 3>means there are either more supermassive binaries out there, or

368
00:18:06.640 --> 00:18:08.680
<v Speaker 3>they're much more massive than we thought.

369
00:18:08.839 --> 00:18:10.839
<v Speaker 2>And that brings us right back to j twenty three

370
00:18:11.000 --> 00:18:13.200
<v Speaker 2>seven four five three seven exactly.

371
00:18:13.799 --> 00:18:17.599
<v Speaker 3>If massive chaotic dust and shrouded early mergers like this

372
00:18:17.720 --> 00:18:21.039
<v Speaker 3>are more common than we realized, which optal surveys missed

373
00:18:21.039 --> 00:18:23.319
<v Speaker 3>because of the dust, then they could be the exact

374
00:18:23.359 --> 00:18:25.039
<v Speaker 3>source of that extra gravitational noise.

375
00:18:25.119 --> 00:18:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Wow, it's a perfect loop. We use the submillimeter ALMA

376
00:18:28.519 --> 00:18:30.920
<v Speaker 2>data to prove the quasar pair exists and cut through

377
00:18:30.920 --> 00:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the optical illusion, and that proves these massive early mergers happen,

378
00:18:34.960 --> 00:18:39.079
<v Speaker 2>which perfectly explains the invisible gravitational hum vibrating through our detectors.

379
00:18:39.240 --> 00:18:41.799
<v Speaker 3>Right now, it links the entire history of the cosmos

380
00:18:41.880 --> 00:18:43.519
<v Speaker 3>into one mechanical framework.

381
00:18:43.920 --> 00:18:46.319
<v Speaker 2>It really does. I mean, we started with a suspicious,

382
00:18:46.400 --> 00:18:49.799
<v Speaker 2>tiny dot at the edge of the observable universe. We

383
00:18:49.920 --> 00:18:53.559
<v Speaker 2>unpack the invisible ionized carbon, mapped the tidal wreckage of

384
00:18:53.559 --> 00:18:57.000
<v Speaker 2>galaxies churning out five hundred stars a year, and tracked

385
00:18:57.039 --> 00:19:00.640
<v Speaker 2>their brutal two point one billion year or decay.

386
00:19:00.680 --> 00:19:04.200
<v Speaker 3>And the timeline of that decay is just it's fundamentally

387
00:19:04.240 --> 00:19:05.240
<v Speaker 3>hard to wrap your head around.

388
00:19:05.279 --> 00:19:08.240
<v Speaker 2>It is because we are observing them at redshift five

389
00:19:08.279 --> 00:19:11.400
<v Speaker 2>point seven. The light we just analyzed has been traveling

390
00:19:11.440 --> 00:19:15.680
<v Speaker 2>through expanding space for nearly thirteen billion years. But the

391
00:19:15.720 --> 00:19:18.440
<v Speaker 2>actual physics we just talked about, the friction, the scattering,

392
00:19:18.480 --> 00:19:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the final merger only takes two point one billion years, right,

393
00:19:22.759 --> 00:19:25.920
<v Speaker 2>which means from an objective standpoint, the future of these

394
00:19:25.920 --> 00:19:29.359
<v Speaker 2>black holes is already ancient history. They merged over ten

395
00:19:29.480 --> 00:19:30.400
<v Speaker 2>billion years ago.

396
00:19:30.640 --> 00:19:34.079
<v Speaker 3>That grand finale happened before our Solar system even existed exactly.

397
00:19:34.440 --> 00:19:37.519
<v Speaker 2>The immense burst of gravitational waves from their final collision

398
00:19:37.720 --> 00:19:40.559
<v Speaker 2>was injected into space time billions of years before the

399
00:19:40.640 --> 00:19:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Earth formed. Yet, because those ripples travel at the speed

400
00:19:43.480 --> 00:19:46.640
<v Speaker 2>of light just like the photons, those exact shockwaves are

401
00:19:46.680 --> 00:19:48.000
<v Speaker 2>still racing toward us right now.

402
00:19:48.039 --> 00:19:48.920
<v Speaker 3>They're still in transit.

403
00:19:49.160 --> 00:19:51.640
<v Speaker 2>It's mind bending. When you look up at the night sky,

404
00:19:51.720 --> 00:19:54.440
<v Speaker 2>you aren't just looking at stars. You are literally wading

405
00:19:54.519 --> 00:19:58.079
<v Speaker 2>through a sea of invisible shockwaves from colossal collisions in

406
00:19:58.119 --> 00:20:01.319
<v Speaker 2>a universe that doesn't even exist anymore. The echoes of

407
00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:04.359
<v Speaker 2>j twenty zero three seven four five three seven haven't

408
00:20:04.400 --> 00:20:07.240
<v Speaker 2>even washed over us yet. We are literally just waiting

409
00:20:07.240 --> 00:20:09.880
<v Speaker 2>for the ripples to arrive. What other invisible ghosts of

410
00:20:09.920 --> 00:20:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the ancient cosmos are watching over us right now?
