Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to the transmission X Midnight News. I'm
Speaker 1: your host, Nate Allen, and the date of which we
Speaker 1: will be destroying the propaganda headlines is November ninth, and
Speaker 1: somewhere around in there I will provide for you a
Speaker 1: real story. A transmission is a signal sent from one
Speaker 1: person or place to another, and it is my hope
Speaker 1: that this signal provide you a beacon so that you
Speaker 1: may find what it is that was meant to find you.
Speaker 1: If you have found this transmission, it is not in error.
Speaker 1: So grab a collie, strike a match. Let's burn this
Speaker 1: midnight oil together. And if you're a little younger you
Speaker 1: need energy, drink grab that. Do whatever you gotta do,
Speaker 1: but most importantly, always be ready. Oh ready, then, hello friends, Hello,
Speaker 1: let's jump right into Newsmax night. What have we got?
Speaker 1: What would have got? Newsmax? What do we have? We
Speaker 1: got Trump? Warpath Trump or a war path? And it's Trump.
Speaker 1: Oh Biden there too, man, he's an ugly fellow. All right,
Speaker 1: Biden Trump will meet on Wednesday. I wouldn't if I
Speaker 1: was Trump, I wouldn't trust that. I would not trust
Speaker 1: that we're gonna end up seeing Trump go in there
Speaker 1: and then come out and there's gonna be something slightly
Speaker 1: off about him. It's gonna come out. They're gonna have
Speaker 1: a Trump clone waiting for him. Man. I say that
Speaker 1: in all jest, but inside my heart I kind of
Speaker 1: think that that's a possibility. I would stay as far
Speaker 1: away from creepy Biden. I mean, because look, we've all
Speaker 1: seen the videos of his weird wrinkles that never used
Speaker 1: to be there, and the line that looked like he
Speaker 1: was wearing a mask. He's the reason most people have
Speaker 1: questioned the validity of clones. That's he's the reason we
Speaker 1: all have seen the weird wrinkled looking And then of
Speaker 1: course everyone goes to look it up, and then you
Speaker 1: find out, oh, those those were CIA masks. And then
Speaker 1: you find out that CIA agent well, now that she
Speaker 1: could talk about it after her NDA had expired, she
Speaker 1: was like the head of the mask department for the CIA. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna go on a tangent on that, But
Speaker 1: then you realize it's all real, So we don't know
Speaker 1: actually who is up there probably ninety percent of the time,
Speaker 1: and they've had political doubles for many, many, many many years.
Speaker 1: I would I wouldn't do that. You know what, A
Speaker 1: phone call would suffice. If I was Trump, a phone
Speaker 1: call would suffice. That's all I gotta say about that headline,
Speaker 1: that is, it's just a fluff headline, you know, and
Speaker 1: then the next one underneath it's just fluff again. They
Speaker 1: don't have anything real here. Trump officially wins Nevada, all
Speaker 1: seven swing states, and it's a little picture of Trump
Speaker 1: with his thumb up. Yeah, we know you love Trump
Speaker 1: News Max, we get it all right, Check Fox. You know,
Speaker 1: let's stay on the Trump train. Think it's a Trump
Speaker 1: trainer if they've been on that menendesk kick, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Let's see, Oh there's the Menendas. But you know what,
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about them today. What do we got
Speaker 1: authorities investigate disturbing racist text messages sent across the US.
Speaker 1: That sounds like not real. It sounds like something to
Speaker 1: get people in an uproar. And you know, my gut
Speaker 1: tells me it's an FBI or a CIA move just
Speaker 1: to create a story, to try to create division, you know, playbook,
Speaker 1: regular deep state playbook. So they don't really have any
Speaker 1: headlines either, just that in the Menendez brothers, I really
Speaker 1: don't care. You know what, someone messaged me, go ahead,
Speaker 1: send me an email if I'm missing anything. Here is
Speaker 1: the menendesk kit. I just really don't want to look
Speaker 1: into it. Is there something juicy going on? Were they
Speaker 1: innocent the whole time? If they've been completely framed? This
Speaker 1: is something I need to know about because from what
Speaker 1: I remember, they were not they were creepy, and uh,
Speaker 1: you know what, I don't really want to go into
Speaker 1: it because true crime is a whole other beast. But yeah,
Speaker 1: message me transmission x at mail dot com, not gmail
Speaker 1: at mail dot com. If there's anything specific I need
Speaker 1: to know about this. That that why they're covering it,
Speaker 1: because I still refuse to click on the links. I
Speaker 1: just see it and i'most like another fluff headline that
Speaker 1: you know. They're just filling in space with something juicy.
Speaker 1: They think that can get your attention and keep it
Speaker 1: for a little bit because it looks like they don't
Speaker 1: have much. Looks like they don't have much. Okay, now
Speaker 1: we're gonna move on because there is nothing you know
Speaker 1: that I'm seeing that's deceitful here. It's just you know,
Speaker 1: they're gonna give you. We all know the news is slated.
Speaker 1: But what I look for is for them purposely not
Speaker 1: covering something or in a story going over the what
Speaker 1: is the real story that happens quite a bit. That's
Speaker 1: what I look for. And Okay, what do we got
Speaker 1: for CBS news, c News, who's this? Okay, they're going
Speaker 1: true crime to come on Cold case murder. Victim was
Speaker 1: a bridesmaid in killer's wedding. We might have to just
Speaker 1: get into true crime. But then I don't want to
Speaker 1: do that because when I get into something, I'm a researcher.
Speaker 1: I scour the internet for stories. I'm a I like
Speaker 1: the real news, which really going on, And if I
Speaker 1: start getting into this, that'll just go down. We'll just
Speaker 1: be going down crazy rabbit holes at that point, and
Speaker 1: then the next one serial killer Rodney, I'll call it
Speaker 1: trail of murder. What is am I on the wrong?
Speaker 1: This is there's nothing else going on in the world.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're we were on the verge of World
Speaker 1: War three. Israel was and I mean Israel, Iran, China,
Speaker 1: there was North Korea was getting involved sending troops on.
Speaker 1: There's I mean, there's big things going on that could
Speaker 1: affect the livelihood of the entire world, and this is
Speaker 1: what they got. This can't be held up. This is
Speaker 1: US news. Yep, that's what they got. Apparently that's the
Speaker 1: most important thing happening. Okay, all right, well let's go
Speaker 1: to NBC and see what they have US news. Here
Speaker 1: we come. Okay, NBC, NBCNBCNBC. Let's go. Wildfires rage across
Speaker 1: the Northeast as twenty seven million people remain under fire alert.
Speaker 1: Is is it crazy? As we as I spoke to
Speaker 1: you about the UN having their their meeting in Columbia,
Speaker 1: how they're wanting funding for these I want to say
Speaker 1: they call it biodiversity, but I want to say it's
Speaker 1: just a straight up environmental agenda. And when I remember
Speaker 1: when I looked into the biodiversity conversation, they wanted specific
Speaker 1: funding for biodiversity crisis. And then of course all around
Speaker 1: the world at the time when they're looking for funding
Speaker 1: from nations, that biodiversity crisis is happening everywhere, environmental crisis
Speaker 1: is happening everywhere. It seems to be that. Ever, since
Speaker 1: you know what, this might be the real story. This
Speaker 1: is where I might get it from. Because I've been
Speaker 1: looking all day and I haven't really found much. I
Speaker 1: did see a couple quotes from earlier, and I was like, uh, apparently,
Speaker 1: let me see. I think Carl Sagan passed away, you know,
Speaker 1: big time science, sky space Sky. I saw a quote
Speaker 1: that everyone's posting, let's see, passed away. I saw a
Speaker 1: quote that everyone's posting. It kind of annoyed me a
Speaker 1: little bit. Cornell A. Stronemer dies today December twentieth. Wait
Speaker 1: why were they posting it now? Was it like an
Speaker 1: anniversary of his death? He was dead a long time ago,
Speaker 1: so wait, that's December twentieth, so why were they posting
Speaker 1: Carl Sagan things today? That's what I saw on social
Speaker 1: media today. Carl Sagan. Oh oh, I think I know what.
Speaker 1: I think I know why. Because of the climate stuff
Speaker 1: they're gonna push. Okay, yep, all right, they're gonna push
Speaker 1: these old scientists. And you know what, let me let
Speaker 1: me let me bring up something to y'all real quick,
Speaker 1: because you have to know these scientists. For first of all,
Speaker 1: Ivy League Cornell, right, he's in the club. So these
Speaker 1: scientists get funded that they're not just scientists who just
Speaker 1: only teach and then come out. They get funded and
Speaker 1: you always have to look to who's funding these people
Speaker 1: and the ideas that they're propagating. So we'll get into
Speaker 1: that a little bit later. Let's go over a couple
Speaker 1: more headlines. But I think there was a push on
Speaker 1: social media from bots because I went to Mastodon, and
Speaker 1: if you don't know what Mastodon is, it is a
Speaker 1: social media site that they glorify themselves, that is decentralized
Speaker 1: social media site. A lot of liberals went there after
Speaker 1: the fall of X and I perused there sometimes just
Speaker 1: to see the absolute shite that pours out of these
Speaker 1: people's minds and mouths. And it's never a dull moment
Speaker 1: on Mastodon. But this is where I kept on seeing
Speaker 1: this Carl Sagan quote and from the book, and then
Speaker 1: I start thinking about Carl Sagan, and I'm like, he
Speaker 1: was a big proponent, big time pusher of greenhouse gases
Speaker 1: and humans causing global warming, and anyway, I read this
Speaker 1: quote and I'm gonna read it a little later. I
Speaker 1: think that's where I'm going to go with this, because
Speaker 1: the more we look at these headlines every day, the
Speaker 1: more they're showing you biodiversity crisises, and the more that
Speaker 1: if you look into the WUF and the UN the
Speaker 1: more we're seeing that there's an agenda to get all
Speaker 1: this money and funding by twenty thirty, and I'm just
Speaker 1: it's all. It's pretty much all I'm seeing. And maybe
Speaker 1: that is God telling me that I need to speak
Speaker 1: on it, but that's literally all I'm seeing, and it's
Speaker 1: it's a joke. To me. It is a joke. And
Speaker 1: I'll go over reasons why that this climate. I mean,
Speaker 1: like I've said, there's been forty two climate extreme climate
Speaker 1: predictions that science has been given since I think the
Speaker 1: sixties or seventies, and none of them that I've looked
Speaker 1: into have come true, none of them. And they they're
Speaker 1: always always one thing after another. And now now they
Speaker 1: have to they have to backpedal and change the term
Speaker 1: to involve any type of climate change because they couldn't
Speaker 1: just stick with global warming because they didn't know what
Speaker 1: to do when things start to cool down. I remember
Speaker 1: when I was when I was growing up, the whole
Speaker 1: adage was, oh, well it's got to cool down before
Speaker 1: it gets warmer. I mean this, don't you understand the science?
Speaker 1: And it's just a I was I did look into
Speaker 1: the science, and when that was explained did not make
Speaker 1: sense to me. And I am not one of those
Speaker 1: guys that just does not look or read. I read everything.
Speaker 1: I am a sponge and I just am a good
Speaker 1: bs BS mod like I could just spot spotted a
Speaker 1: mile away. I don't know what you want to call that.
Speaker 1: When we were when I was growing up too, you
Speaker 1: had a gatar, right, So my am my BS radar.
Speaker 1: There's no like funny or cool term that I'm thinking
Speaker 1: of right now. But that's how my brain works. It
Speaker 1: just picks up deception. I before I even know that
Speaker 1: something that the actual truth to the matter, my brain
Speaker 1: will pick up an immediate deception immediately. And that's how
Speaker 1: I know, like, okay, wait a second time out, this
Speaker 1: is you're not making sense here. That's a tell I
Speaker 1: can tell that you are a deceptive individual or this
Speaker 1: is a deceptive message. And then I start to dig,
Speaker 1: and I don't dig with any any confirmation bias. I
Speaker 1: just start to look around and then the deception always
Speaker 1: reveals itself, always reveals itself. Okay, so I might go
Speaker 1: back to that. Let's see what the other news agencies
Speaker 1: or these propaganda agencies, this mockingbird media. Let's see what
Speaker 1: they what else they have to offer. Okay, let's go
Speaker 1: to the Washington Post. Washington Post. Now we have election
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. They're still on it, how Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden lost to Donald Trump. See see now,
Speaker 1: do you remember this media that was posted posted, had
Speaker 1: Joe Biden posted up, trying to get the best picture
Speaker 1: of him, even though it's ridiculously hard to get a
Speaker 1: picture of him or a video. You don't ever want
Speaker 1: to see him walking upstairs. He never makes it. They
Speaker 1: had this guy like he was mentally fit. He was
Speaker 1: the man. He got the most votes, which is weird.
Speaker 1: Go look back at the amount of votes he's got
Speaker 1: compared to Trump then Trump now and how much that
Speaker 1: we saw votes change, and how just that use your
Speaker 1: common sense and what you saw around you, and you
Speaker 1: how many people switched over way more than twenty twenty
Speaker 1: And then go look at the popular vote for each candidate,
Speaker 1: and then look at Biden's in twenty twenty that was
Speaker 1: just all mail in. Huh. It was just all because
Speaker 1: of a because of that pandemic. A Are you sure
Speaker 1: it's just I mean, there's there's the BS radar right
Speaker 1: there there. I mean, if you don't notice something wrong
Speaker 1: with that picture, then I don't know why you're listening
Speaker 1: to me, because our minds don't don't function the same. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so they're gonna go and try to blame that on
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. I think Hillary already started that. Yeah, no
Speaker 1: one cares. Let's look at the where the battle for
Speaker 1: the House stands two twelve to two oh two. Looks
Speaker 1: like the Dems are gaining ground. That's why if I
Speaker 1: that that's the real story, but there's no way to
Speaker 1: cover it. Like I have been preaching to you guys
Speaker 1: that there are these independent companies that go around the
Speaker 1: world and fix elections. Okay, now look at these elections
Speaker 1: that really matter in this house right now? Why are
Speaker 1: they taking They're gonna they said that they may take weeks,
Speaker 1: but the presidential election, it was, it was over in
Speaker 1: a night. And you know, it's just it's all real
Speaker 1: fishy to me. And then, of course in Arizona, Carrie
Speaker 1: Lake's big debacle she's got. I mean, they've been going
Speaker 1: after her. I would I if I had any type
Speaker 1: of power at all, I would go. I'd go personally,
Speaker 1: take a group of independent people up there and count
Speaker 1: every one of those ballots, every one of them, look
Speaker 1: at them. I would you know, what I would do
Speaker 1: is what I think the people deserve. I think that
Speaker 1: people deserve twenty four to seven footage of every ballot
Speaker 1: counted and let and just put us put a camera
Speaker 1: on it, crystal clear HD camera, take the names away
Speaker 1: and just go through it. Have technology take the actual
Speaker 1: the pertinent information away and just go through the actual selections.
Speaker 1: And then have people be able to watch these things
Speaker 1: when there's when it's something as highly contested as this,
Speaker 1: just have it playing like you know how they have
Speaker 1: c SPAN on all the time. No one ever watches
Speaker 1: because it's really boring unless you're me. I used to
Speaker 1: watch it for hours. I remember the Cap and Trade
Speaker 1: Act of Obama and that's when I knew he was evil.
Speaker 1: I watched the entire countdown to that, and uh yeah,
Speaker 1: I have that memory and reading. I downloaded that read
Speaker 1: all the pages. It was something crazy like eleven hundred pages.
Speaker 1: I've been into this stuff for a very long time anyway.
Speaker 1: But yeah, just have it on TV. If people want
Speaker 1: to watch, they watch. If they don't, but you know,
Speaker 1: there's gonna be folks that record every minute, every vote,
Speaker 1: and that it'll be if you be able to tally
Speaker 1: it up. If that would be even possible without showing
Speaker 1: the person's pertinent information as to keep their identity and
Speaker 1: their voting record everything purely secretive, of which I think
Speaker 1: it should be. But if there was a way that
Speaker 1: the public could confirm that we the people could confirm
Speaker 1: their counts, I think everyone would feel a lot better
Speaker 1: about the entire situation. I know that is probably only
Speaker 1: in my imagination and complete make believe, but I think
Speaker 1: that that I think that that would make because sometimes
Speaker 1: it doesn't make sense. Sometimes it's just like you have
Speaker 1: to if you want to call these polland places, be like,
Speaker 1: make this make sense to me. Please. When her constituents
Speaker 1: all live around her and the area is voted, they
Speaker 1: all voted for Trump overwhelmingly, and then just so happens
Speaker 1: that all of these liberal votes come in, and you know,
Speaker 1: maybe maybe I'm wrong, because what's happening around the country
Speaker 1: unless these businesses that are fixing elections are going for
Speaker 1: the smaller elections, which could be could not you know,
Speaker 1: who knows that's neither here nor there. But are there
Speaker 1: are states that went primarily for Trump that are electing
Speaker 1: democratic governors or you know what. And that's even sketchy too,
Speaker 1: because they love to have governors governors used by the
Speaker 1: deep staw. I mean, look at Newsom. That is a
Speaker 1: deep state plant if you've ever seen one. Look at Newsom.
Speaker 1: He's trying to play Republicans against each other by the
Speaker 1: way he's he's he's stating all these things that California
Speaker 1: is gonna safeguard themselves against the against the against Trump,
Speaker 1: and it's just using you know, fine, fine, he's trying
Speaker 1: to I guess they think he wants Republicans and conservatives
Speaker 1: to say, no, you can't do that. And then, of
Speaker 1: course that would be hypocritical because Republicans and libertarians believe
Speaker 1: completely in states rights. So if he wants to be
Speaker 1: the cause of even more of that state's ruin, go
Speaker 1: for it, buddy, go for it. The state is turning
Speaker 1: on you. I've seen a lot more read Remember that Newsom.
Speaker 1: What did Trump call him? New scum? Yeah, he's a
Speaker 1: scumbag one thousand percent a scumbag. Okay, now let's get
Speaker 1: out of NBC. They don't have anything for Oh no,
Speaker 1: that we're in the Washington past. There, let's check a
Speaker 1: Gateway pundit just so, just because what do we got
Speaker 1: Gateway Pundit fabulous news. It says Mike Pompeo and Nikki
Speaker 1: Hayley will not be invited to be part of Trump's
Speaker 1: second administration. Well, I mean, obviously she's a turncoat. He's
Speaker 1: an intelligence three letter agency scumbag of the highest doory. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean I wouldn't even been I think Trump was
Speaker 1: really polite about it. I wouldn't have even been polite
Speaker 1: about it. Oh and here you go, check this out
Speaker 1: send in the US marshals Arizona officials caught changing the
Speaker 1: ballot totals as counting for US senatec He continues, that's
Speaker 1: Carrie Lake. That's what I was talking about. And I
Speaker 1: didn't see that headline until right now. You see see
Speaker 1: something is something is going on in Arizona and has
Speaker 1: been going on. I wonder if they will actually catch that.
Speaker 1: Is there any update to this story, there's any update
Speaker 1: to this story. We gotta catch it right now. It's
Speaker 1: twelve thirty two. So, man, if I been talking for
Speaker 1: that long or did I start a little late tonight? Okay,
Speaker 1: I don't think I've been talking for that long let's
Speaker 1: see Carrie Lake. Let's just type this sen and see
Speaker 1: what comes up. Carry Lake, Carry Lake, carry Lake. Oh,
Speaker 1: four hours ago, Gallego defeats Lake in Arizona Senate race.
Speaker 1: That's reported from the ill though. I wonder, let's type
Speaker 1: in Carry Lake, US marshals, US marshals. Is this the thing?
Speaker 1: Is this gonna be real? If they really send in
Speaker 1: the marshalls? Send in the US marshal? Do no? I
Speaker 1: think that might have just been a battle cry from
Speaker 1: Lou Dobbs. It looks like, yeah, Arizona GOP chair resigns
Speaker 1: after carry Lake bribery allegation. Oh that was a while back.
Speaker 1: Never mind, let's work that's. Yeah, that's way back. Okay,
Speaker 1: so she lost. I wonder if there's gonna be any
Speaker 1: flak from that, because any type of doubt and that
Speaker 1: type of race, is that a big deal? That is
Speaker 1: a big deal. Okay, Well, let's get out of that
Speaker 1: story since that's not doing us any good here. These
Speaker 1: are not these do you see? These are all like
Speaker 1: they're not main headlines, and there's so much going on. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's go to Sleigh News just because they tend to
Speaker 1: be attempt to at least ruffle some feathers. Explosive study
Speaker 1: COVID vaccines caused one hundred and twelve thousand percent surge
Speaker 1: in brain clots. You don't say, you don't say, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is ridiculous. If you're listening and you care about
Speaker 1: your children, you know, I can't give medical advice. I
Speaker 1: guess we all have to say that, or else they'll
Speaker 1: just take away the they'll just take down the transmission,
Speaker 1: but keep the children away from experimental drugs that mess
Speaker 1: with the child's ability to or their DNA to their
Speaker 1: DNA's ability to react to stimuli, which is mRNA research,
Speaker 1: mRNA technology, and research what that messenger, RNA when it's
Speaker 1: messed with, Research what it does, and then look into
Speaker 1: why is it clotting because of the spike proteins in
Speaker 1: the mRNA drug and it's not good for people, and
Speaker 1: it's harming people a lot of people, as you can see,
Speaker 1: one hundred and twelve thousand percent surge in brain clots,
Speaker 1: poor kids, and they're just lining their kids up, lining
Speaker 1: their kids up because they don't read, they don't question,
Speaker 1: and it's just a form of ignorance. I guess that,
Speaker 1: or just maybe they're just way too trusting. I just
Speaker 1: don't have that in me. I just see way too
Speaker 1: much and I'm like, nah, a hard pass for me. Dog. Okay,
Speaker 1: all right, so let's see any more headlines from Sleigh.
Speaker 1: That's kind of interesting. Dutch government official admidst COVID pandemic
Speaker 1: was military operation Sweet Ministry of Health obeys NATO. That's
Speaker 1: his quote. Yeah, they do, of course they do. I
Speaker 1: hope Trump does get us out of NATO. I want
Speaker 1: us to SOLIDI our borders air tight. I want us
Speaker 1: to develop military that will protect this place like a fortress.
Speaker 1: And then if the rest of the world, and I
Speaker 1: want us to get rid of all the intelligence agencies
Speaker 1: and sending them everywhere and pissing the rest of the
Speaker 1: world off. I want the rest of the world to
Speaker 1: see us like a light like they used to, like
Speaker 1: the beacon on the hill, Like that's how America should
Speaker 1: be seen. Because not everyone in America is following this
Speaker 1: woke nonsense. Not everyone in America is morally bankrupt. Drives
Speaker 1: me crazy. A lot of us, and I'm talking about me,
Speaker 1: who used to be live a completely different lifestyle. A
Speaker 1: lot of us found a relationship with God, and a
Speaker 1: lot of us, healed them, healed ourselves, and a lot
Speaker 1: of us have a lot more to give. And the
Speaker 1: rest of the world knows because what they see in
Speaker 1: the news is I think that the rest of the
Speaker 1: world sees us as exactly how we portray ourselves or
Speaker 1: how the media portrays us. They see us as this
Speaker 1: morally loose, progressive, weak soft and for the most part,
Speaker 1: that is correct. But you still go to gyms and
Speaker 1: they're packed. People do care. People are waking up mentally.
Speaker 1: That's where I come from. That's where most of this
Speaker 1: alternative news comes from. There didn't used to be alternative news.
Speaker 1: Thank goodness for an awakening. Even if some people are
Speaker 1: more awake than others, and some people are just now
Speaker 1: starting to see the truth. That's okay, That is okay, listen.
Speaker 1: Any part of starting to see the truth is better
Speaker 1: than the liberal ideology that has these poor people trapped
Speaker 1: in a prison of their own ignorance. It's the worst
Speaker 1: thing I've ever were witnessed in my life. Like I said,
Speaker 1: I go to these Macedona and I go and I'd
Speaker 1: always check on liberal ideology and what's happening, because it's
Speaker 1: like they're a part of a separate consciousness. That's what
Speaker 1: it seems like to me. And I try to see
Speaker 1: and kind of tap into what they're saying to see
Speaker 1: if any of it has any validity, and it doesn't.
Speaker 1: The only thing that does. I will say this, And
Speaker 1: as you know, I think I feel really bad for
Speaker 1: the people in Palestine because their history just is wrought
Speaker 1: with genocide and Israel has put them in an open
Speaker 1: air prison, and that is the truth. And those people.
Speaker 1: If I were those people, I would be doing everything
Speaker 1: possible to defeat Israel if it was if it was
Speaker 1: doing to me what I see it do to certain people,
Speaker 1: those poor families, those poor children. I couldn't imagine having
Speaker 1: a child in Palestine over the past fifty years. I
Speaker 1: couldn't imagine. And the atrocities that they've gone through, it's
Speaker 1: just uncalled for. There's a way that, I mean, those
Speaker 1: people could be peaceful. They used to live those the
Speaker 1: same type of people used to live together. And I
Speaker 1: just don't this, this whole weird prophecy that these Talmudic Jews,
Speaker 1: these fake Jews force on to the world and everyone else,
Speaker 1: is just it's gross. To me, it's gross. And the
Speaker 1: children there are the ones suffering from what these people
Speaker 1: are doing to them, and it's just sad, all right?
Speaker 1: What else? J six defendants anticipate pardons from Trump? Now,
Speaker 1: that will be interesting. You think Jeremy Brown, the one
Speaker 1: the FBI set up and falsely imprisoned, the guy that
Speaker 1: I told you to go look up his story, You
Speaker 1: think the FBI is going to allow Trump just to
Speaker 1: get him out of jail. I hope, so, I hope, man,
Speaker 1: I secretly still, I know that Trump is from royalty.
Speaker 1: I know that he was chosen, he was plucked to
Speaker 1: be our ruler. But there is a quality in him.
Speaker 1: There is a Maverick in that guy, a little bit
Speaker 1: that I kind of hope God talks to. I kind
Speaker 1: of hope God gets in his spirit a little bit.
Speaker 1: And you know, I really hope he. I hope he.
Speaker 1: I hope he just bucks his rulers and the people
Speaker 1: that tell him or whisper in his ear what he
Speaker 1: should be doing. I hope he just bucks one day
Speaker 1: and frees us all for real. That would be absolutely incredible.
Speaker 1: Do I think it's gonna happen? No? Is that do?
Speaker 1: I think that is more like a pipe dream? Yes?
Speaker 1: But would it be amazing? It would be amazing if
Speaker 1: he just came out and addressed the name and told
Speaker 1: the nation the truth about everything and went to work
Speaker 1: saving this nation from the robber barons, from the rulers
Speaker 1: of Black Rock and State Street and Vanguard. If he
Speaker 1: came out, I mean, listen, he's creating a company. By
Speaker 1: the way, he's creating a company that is they they've
Speaker 1: been in talks. I forgot what the name of it is,
Speaker 1: but it's it's in regards to bitcoin, and he says
Speaker 1: he's been having some pro bitcoin comments. He wants America
Speaker 1: to be first in that in this and I think
Speaker 1: the only reason this is coming out. See you hear me,
Speaker 1: Uh you hear me talking about the hopium in my
Speaker 1: in my heart for all of this. Yeah, I could
Speaker 1: be just taking a few hits of the hopium there,
Speaker 1: but I think all of this is coming out. Why
Speaker 1: you're gonna see people like Glenn Beck. He tweeted in
Speaker 1: the FED, I've been wanting to end the FED forever.
Speaker 1: Glenn Beck was never on that train. Glenn Beck was
Speaker 1: never on that train. Ron Paul's been the only person
Speaker 1: saying in the FED since like nineteen seventy Ron Paul
Speaker 1: should be the president of the United States in my opinion,
Speaker 1: but you're going to see people I think Elon Musk
Speaker 1: said something about in the FED. They really The only
Speaker 1: reason I think that they are now in this battle
Speaker 1: cry that they're going to get the Libertarians behind him,
Speaker 1: is because they own or their interests. The owners of
Speaker 1: this world now control blockchain technology, and they will use
Speaker 1: alt coins like or they'll use technology such as XRP
Speaker 1: and XLM. They will use those to circumnavigate this crisis,
Speaker 1: this monetary crisis that the US has got us and
Speaker 1: the rest of the world in that. I think that's
Speaker 1: what they're going to do, and that's why I think
Speaker 1: that he is so pro bi coin now and before
Speaker 1: he wasn't. Before he was not, and I think that
Speaker 1: he's going to be a part of it. I think
Speaker 1: his company is going to be heavily involved in not
Speaker 1: only coins, but probably he's smart enough to know that
Speaker 1: he could he could start a loan program. From what
Speaker 1: I read, I think he wants the ability for he
Speaker 1: wants the ability to step into banking, big banking. I
Speaker 1: feel like that's his next play and he's going to
Speaker 1: not just use regular what we know of as currency now.
Speaker 1: But he's going to use bitcoin xrp XLM, He's going
Speaker 1: to use the blockchain technology. And I think that in
Speaker 1: his mind this is I mean, that's a big play
Speaker 1: for his lineage for the future, and he could just
Speaker 1: they'll never have to They'll be the new Rothchild's, do
Speaker 1: you know what I mean? And it's not like the
Speaker 1: roth Childs to be gone. No, they they've changed their name.
Speaker 1: They marry into families. They are so high up. They're
Speaker 1: not the highest family. Don't don't get it twisted. They
Speaker 1: were working for higher royal interests and they had to
Speaker 1: marry in. Remember I told you last night they had
Speaker 1: to marry in to a royal family before they started
Speaker 1: acquiring true power. They're allowed to get power by the Vatican,
Speaker 1: by Rome, by yeah, by the Gray Pope. Look up
Speaker 1: the Gray Pope. I don't even want to go into
Speaker 1: that tonight, but look up the Gray Pope and his
Speaker 1: dealings with the with the with House of Rothschild. If
Speaker 1: you want to go down a rabbit hole, do that one. Okay,
Speaker 1: So I think I am through. So we got it
Speaker 1: ended with CNN. We got to end it with CNN.
Speaker 1: All right, what do we got CNN. What do we
Speaker 1: got We can't have dead air here. Hurry up, CNN. Okay.
Speaker 1: Trump launches another business full of potential risks, okay, and
Speaker 1: conflicts if he wins. Is this what I was just
Speaker 1: talking about? Donald Trump and his children unveiled a new
Speaker 1: cryptocurrency here we go business Monday in a virtual address
Speaker 1: from his mar A Lago estate, the latest venture that
Speaker 1: stands to benefit the former president as he seeks another
Speaker 1: four years in the oval office. He's going to have
Speaker 1: an issue going into the White House. That's a conflict
Speaker 1: to interest a little bit, but I'm sure he'll make
Speaker 1: it happen. The company will be called World Liberty Financial.
Speaker 1: It'll remain limited, but his son, Donald Trump Junior suggested
Speaker 1: the new company will provide opportunities for people who cannot
Speaker 1: get financing from traditional banks. Interesting. The GOP nominee himself
Speaker 1: has teased the latest expansion of his family's business empire
Speaker 1: from the same social media account that carries his political messaging,
Speaker 1: and shared vague thoughts Monday about the perceived upside in quotes,
Speaker 1: It's very young and very growing, Trump said of the
Speaker 1: cryptocurrency industry, I do believe in it. HM, let's go
Speaker 1: further into this article. The virtual event proceeded as planned,
Speaker 1: despite Sunday's apparent assassination attempt. Okay, so this was a
Speaker 1: while Was this a while ago? When was this? Oh?
Speaker 1: I missed it? Shoot, I absolutely missed this. Why is
Speaker 1: this in the news today? Whatever? This is a big story.
Speaker 1: This is a big story. I completely missed that he
Speaker 1: was going into cryptocurrency. And I don't know how I was.
Speaker 1: I don't think I had started in September. I had
Speaker 1: started back, and that's probably how I wasn't hounding the
Speaker 1: news cycle like usual. But interesting. I think him going
Speaker 1: into the White House with this business may have some
Speaker 1: ethics concerns, but they'll get that's just that is just semantics.
Speaker 1: They'll get around all that. But that's interesting. That is interesting.
Speaker 1: What's it say? But this latest enterprise taking off just
Speaker 1: fifty days before the election, comes with a hornet's nest
Speaker 1: of ethical Okay, all right, I'm calling my future today.
Speaker 1: This is weird. That's pretty much what I just said.
Speaker 1: And you know what, why did this? Ceenn Cee and Inn,
Speaker 1: Let's let's go back a little bit. Why did you
Speaker 1: send me to September? An article from September this is
Speaker 1: November night. Still hasn't signed Oh there it is. Trump
Speaker 1: still hasn't signed ethics agreement required for presidential transition. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Like I said, that's just semantics. And I don't know
Speaker 1: why they took me on that wild goose chase and
Speaker 1: why I keep calling what I'm gonna see today? That's
Speaker 1: just real weird. Okay. You know some days it's like that, Uh, okay, well,
Speaker 1: now let's go to let's go to info Wars. I
Speaker 1: don't want to end on that note. CNN. That was boring. CIA.
Speaker 1: You can do better than that. I mean it, it
Speaker 1: was kind of the best story of the day because
Speaker 1: if Trump gets into banking, it's like we're watching a
Speaker 1: brand new rothschild, you know, you know, since he's already
Speaker 1: in the family, since he's already part of the club,
Speaker 1: they may as well finalize his transition. And he just
Speaker 1: may may as well just own the biggest bank in
Speaker 1: the world too. Why not? Why not? Why not give
Speaker 1: every why not give him just power of the entire world.
Speaker 1: It's not just kidding, that's the last thing I want. Okay, now,
Speaker 1: let's go to let's go to info Wars. Just because
Speaker 1: just because what do we got US defunded Eco Health
Speaker 1: for gain of function oversight lapses, only to waive it
Speaker 1: for any federal agency oh conducting deadly pathogen experiments bioweapons
Speaker 1: wild West question mark. So the the US says, now
Speaker 1: you can't, we're not gonna allow. We saw what Fauci
Speaker 1: did and we're not gonna prosecute him because he was
Speaker 1: our boy. But we saw what he did with gain
Speaker 1: of function. And by the way, gain of function is
Speaker 1: like when you take a virus and you add stuff
Speaker 1: to it, you provide another function of the virus. You
Speaker 1: can make it stronger. And they say that they use
Speaker 1: this in order to develop stronger drugs for the original
Speaker 1: virus that you know, that didn't really make sense to me,
Speaker 1: but anyway, they add things to a virus to make
Speaker 1: it stronger and then they test this. And remember Fauci
Speaker 1: was questioned over gain of function research on what they
Speaker 1: thought was the COVID nineteen virus, and boy, he got
Speaker 1: rand Paul did his best in questioning and he's absolutely guilty,
Speaker 1: absolutely guilty. What that man has done during animal testing
Speaker 1: is just it makes you sick. He is just a
Speaker 1: he's an awful He's another scumbag. He's just an awful
Speaker 1: human being. But yeah, so now the US defunded that,
Speaker 1: they said you can't do that. But you know what,
Speaker 1: if you're any federal agency, see this is why I
Speaker 1: don't like any of these agencies, then you can conduct
Speaker 1: deadly pathogen experiments all you want. Go for it, go
Speaker 1: for it. Just let us know, and we're in control
Speaker 1: of you. But just let us know. You know. Yeah,
Speaker 1: same government who said there's no bioweapons labs in Ukraine,
Speaker 1: absolute mularkey, And then of course there were absolutely bioweapons
Speaker 1: labs in Ukraine. Yeah. Yeah, that's our government, our quote
Speaker 1: unquote government, our regime, very very republic of you, very
Speaker 1: republic of you. And that is why I will not
Speaker 1: stop harping on. Do never never never never, do never.
Speaker 1: Don't you ever allow anyone around you to use the
Speaker 1: term democracy for this country. The more they get that
Speaker 1: into the consciousness of this country of Americans, the more
Speaker 1: it will take hold. That's why they use it over
Speaker 1: and over and over again. That it is almost used
Speaker 1: as a spell in that way, so that you can
Speaker 1: think that this is a democracy or their system of control.
Speaker 1: And I am here and I will always be here
Speaker 1: to say that it's absolutely not we the people. Well,
Speaker 1: we could take this place back in a heartbeat. Speaking
Speaker 1: of if you want to go watch a complete liberal,
Speaker 1: completely liberal made movie that was quoted I think on
Speaker 1: two transmissions ago, maybe one last night. Go watch war Room.
Speaker 1: It was made in twenty twenty four. Go watch War Room.
Speaker 1: And what it is. It's a documentary. They go get
Speaker 1: like thirty five or more. I believe, actual government workers
Speaker 1: who worked in two the past two administrations, from military
Speaker 1: all the way down to administrative, and they gather these
Speaker 1: folks and they war plan what would happen if they
Speaker 1: have to make sure that whoever was going to be
Speaker 1: the president wasn't going to be the president, meaning that
Speaker 1: whoever they wanted to certify the election, if they couldn't
Speaker 1: certify the election, they were gonna get ready for riots
Speaker 1: they were going to get They have a war plan
Speaker 1: for the US military to go against the people if
Speaker 1: the people become unruly. Now now me, now, like I'll
Speaker 1: always say, I'm your huckle I'd be if I found
Speaker 1: out that was happening, I'd be front lines. Front lines.
Speaker 1: You have to fight. That's tyranny. And for them to
Speaker 1: war plan like that, even in a documentary for it
Speaker 1: to almost be real because they were using real people
Speaker 1: from the government from the past two administrations for them
Speaker 1: to war plan like this kind of like Event two one,
Speaker 1: like how they just wargamed COVID and then it happened
Speaker 1: exactly as they wargamed it. For them to do this
Speaker 1: is it should startle everyone. And if they're going to
Speaker 1: wargame that outcome, I think the American people, with their
Speaker 1: friends and family should be prepping and wargaming for that outcome.
Speaker 1: You know, let's all hope that it's just that it's
Speaker 1: just a what if scenario. But if they're planning for
Speaker 1: the what if scenario, we should be planning for the
Speaker 1: what if scenario? Should we not? If they're planning on
Speaker 1: telling the military in that type of situation to protect
Speaker 1: their democracy, well we have to be ready to stand
Speaker 1: up and protect our republic. So that's the big difference. So,
Speaker 1: I mean, if they're gonna war game, we're gonna war game.
Speaker 1: And all that means is you just get in a
Speaker 1: circle and you figure out a plan. But maybe we
Speaker 1: should get in more than one circle and figure out
Speaker 1: a bigger plan. You know, maybe we should talk to
Speaker 1: our friends and they should talk to their friends, and
Speaker 1: they should talk to their friends. And then, you know,
Speaker 1: just in case your government becomes tyrannical and acts on it,
Speaker 1: that way, you have a contingency plan. And then we
Speaker 1: all hope it's all sunshine and rainbows, right, that's what
Speaker 1: we hope. We hope that everything remains transparent, that they
Speaker 1: understand their role, that they continue to represent the will
Speaker 1: of we the people, and that they shouldn't even be
Speaker 1: thinking of anything negative like that, because we the people,
Speaker 1: if organized would be their worst nightmare, then that's just
Speaker 1: a fact. If the people organized against a tyrannical government
Speaker 1: and they actually gave us time, that'd be a problem.
Speaker 1: So let's be a problem. Let's be a mental problem.
Speaker 1: Let's just start talking about, Hey, if the government went crazy,
Speaker 1: what would you do? Where would you go, who would
Speaker 1: you help? How would this work? Do we have food?
Speaker 1: I think we should all be figuring out just for
Speaker 1: the future, just for our children's future. If the government,
Speaker 1: because the government the past thirty years has just been
Speaker 1: kind of brazen, kind of bold, and if they decide
Speaker 1: to get to where the people think that they're too
Speaker 1: big for the bridges, then maybe we should just start
Speaker 1: talking and say well, okay, we were going to meet here,
Speaker 1: this is what we're going to do, and just in
Speaker 1: case they get threatening, this is how we're gonna respond,
Speaker 1: and then just have that conversation. Have that conversation, you know,
Speaker 1: don't I mean, obviously this is just a what if scenario.
Speaker 1: But they're wargaming it and making a documentary. Maybe we
Speaker 1: should wargame it and make a documentary if the government
Speaker 1: got too big, what exactly would would we do to
Speaker 1: Maybe there should be a war game two, but made
Speaker 1: from the people's perspective. Now, let's just make it a movie. Right,
Speaker 1: that would just that way, it would just be a
Speaker 1: what if almost mockumentary, and maybe that would be a
Speaker 1: good solution at least getting people thinking if their government
Speaker 1: went crazy. Oh and look what FEMA's doing in North
Speaker 1: Carolina right now, right outside of Asheville. There's just giant
Speaker 1: FEMA camps. It's there. Go on TikTok and look up Asheville,
Speaker 1: North Carolina. Giant FEMA camps. You know, you don't see
Speaker 1: them helping the towns, but you do see a complete
Speaker 1: government installation. That's weird, Like, come on, man, just stop anyway,
Speaker 1: all right, let's get Let's go back to let me
Speaker 1: see if I can find that Carl Sagan bit. Let's
Speaker 1: see if I can find that Carl Sagan bit. I
Speaker 1: know it's around here somewhere, uh do Let's see Carl Sagan.
Speaker 1: I know I found it on one of these, one
Speaker 1: of these websites. It was I think it was here.
Speaker 1: It is, okay, the demon slash haunted world, say Carl
Speaker 1: Sagan quote. And it's kind of lengthy, but this is
Speaker 1: what the liberals are posting and kind of in like
Speaker 1: trying to be clever about their posts. Are you ready?
Speaker 1: I have a foreboding of an America in my children
Speaker 1: or grandchildren's time, when the United States is a service
Speaker 1: in information economy, when nearly all the key manufacturing industries
Speaker 1: have slipped away to other countries, when awesome technol logical
Speaker 1: powers are in the hands of a very few and
Speaker 1: no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues,
Speaker 1: when the people have lost the ability to set their
Speaker 1: own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority. Hold on,
Speaker 1: let me stop right there. For liberals to be posting this, yeah,
Speaker 1: they they may have been the anti establishment party at
Speaker 1: one point in time, but do not get it twisted.
Speaker 1: That is a long time ago, and they are all
Speaker 1: the boot liquor. They are all licking the boots of
Speaker 1: Uncle Sam right now. So it's even funnier to me
Speaker 1: that this is posted on these extreme liberals like this
Speaker 1: is something clever, Like it's something they understand and that
Speaker 1: we don't. Okay, let me continue. When clutching our crystals
Speaker 1: and nervously consulting our horoscopes are critical faculties and decline.
Speaker 1: Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true,
Speaker 1: we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness.
Speaker 1: The dumbing down of America is most evident in the
Speaker 1: slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media.
Speaker 1: The thirty second sound bites now down to ten seconds
Speaker 1: or less, lowest common denominator programming of that sounds like
Speaker 1: a liberal to me. I mean, this is calling pot
Speaker 1: calling kettle black, credulous presentations and pseudoscience and superstition, but
Speaker 1: especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Now, who does
Speaker 1: that sound like to you? That sounds I mean, you
Speaker 1: just watched the Kamala campaign, right, You just watched the
Speaker 1: entertainment at her rallies. Right, you mean all just witnessed,
Speaker 1: how okay? And one thing you have to remember, Carl
Speaker 1: Sagan was a big, big time He was a big
Speaker 1: time proposed like I want to say, protagonist in the
Speaker 1: whole environmental movement, the greenhouse gas movement, because they used
Speaker 1: him in that way. Wasn't an antagonist. He was a protagonist.
Speaker 1: He was a he was he was one of the
Speaker 1: main characters for them to push this message that people
Speaker 1: on this Earth are the biggest cause of the rise
Speaker 1: in greenhouse gases and that it was causing global warming
Speaker 1: to an alarming rate. And he was that. He was
Speaker 1: that guy, that guy. And I can't stress that enough
Speaker 1: because these these scientists, right they they're funded, they are funded.
Speaker 1: And let me go over with you if I can
Speaker 1: find it, who was funding Carl Sagan? How he got paid?
Speaker 1: He got paid from well one Cornell University. But if
Speaker 1: I can find it, let me see here, there it
Speaker 1: is there, it is. That's who he got paid from. NASA.
Speaker 1: He got a lot of his money from NASA grants
Speaker 1: and contracts. And remember Werner von Braun and NASA. He
Speaker 1: was in the club. And yeah, so he had NASA
Speaker 1: funding him funding his research. Then you had the National
Speaker 1: Science Foundation that is a government funded foundation, these foundations,
Speaker 1: the owners of these foundations. If you start looking back
Speaker 1: at five oh one c three's and foundations and go
Speaker 1: and you go through where they came from, you'll find
Speaker 1: out a lot of the times that the powers that
Speaker 1: be run these foundations, and then these foundations end up
Speaker 1: providing the information that they end up funding science, funding
Speaker 1: science experiments. And remember one hundred percent or almost one
Speaker 1: hundred percent of scientists agree with who funds them. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's you can always trace back the money, all right.
Speaker 1: Then he got paid for book sales and television and
Speaker 1: public speaking. Okay, but big one NASA, NASA, yep, that's
Speaker 1: who made him made him very popular. And listen, I
Speaker 1: think he was a pretty bright guy. I think that
Speaker 1: he may have been duped or he was either in
Speaker 1: on it. He was either because because I think that
Speaker 1: global warming, that people causing global warming, is a complete hopes,
Speaker 1: a complete scam, a complete money grab. That's what I
Speaker 1: think it is. And interestingly enough, there are a lot
Speaker 1: of reasons why I think it is. Oh and you
Speaker 1: know why they brought up Carl Sagan today because it's
Speaker 1: Carl Sagan Day. I did not know November ninth was
Speaker 1: Carl Sagan Day. And funny enough that he just mentioned
Speaker 1: that about horoscopes and Penn Live Patriot News they offer
Speaker 1: your horoscope for November ninth, the Carl second day. Are
Speaker 1: they doing that to poke fun out or what? I
Speaker 1: don't know. That's funny, but here's I have. I got
Speaker 1: some facts for you because for anyone who is going
Speaker 1: to because if you google this, if you google climate change,
Speaker 1: and if you google, remember remember Google's part Google. Google
Speaker 1: is part of the club, and if you google climate
Speaker 1: change or global warming, you will get the club's answers
Speaker 1: to everything. They will call what I'm about to say misinformation,
Speaker 1: but it's not. I have a lot of facts. I've
Speaker 1: been establishing a lot of facts for a very long time.
Speaker 1: But I found one article and I thought it was interesting,
Speaker 1: and I'm just gonna I'm gonna read from this article.
Speaker 1: It's called top fifteen unbelievable reasons that prove global warming
Speaker 1: might be a hoax right. Global warming is a name
Speaker 1: given to the current belief that the Earth's temperature has
Speaker 1: been gradually increasing over the past few hundred years, since
Speaker 1: the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. The human impact on
Speaker 1: this is believed to only account for ten percent of
Speaker 1: all the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. As such, it
Speaker 1: is highly unlikely that we as a species are having
Speaker 1: a massive negative impact on the stability of the Earth's climate.
Speaker 1: Oh also also big time today. I saw a tweet
Speaker 1: from I think it was a tweet from RFK. He
Speaker 1: said he's going to end chemtrails, so boom, there you go,
Speaker 1: there you go. If it's something he has to end,
Speaker 1: it's something that has to be real. They're not contrails, people,
Speaker 1: They're not contrails. Kim trails have been real, and they
Speaker 1: have been measured. Scientists have measured in chim trails. They
Speaker 1: have measured as soon as they finish seeing these plane
Speaker 1: spray whatever comes out the back of them. That in
Speaker 1: a lot of their measurements when they measure the soil afterwards.
Speaker 1: Compared to prior, there are a lot of heavy metals. Now,
Speaker 1: why would you be dusting our atmosphere with heavy metals?
Speaker 1: I mean, and didn't Bill Gates say wants to block
Speaker 1: the sun? You know there's agenda here, But it's not
Speaker 1: just random people increasing greenhouse gases via carbon it's not
Speaker 1: just that's not what's happening. And do you remember they
Speaker 1: were trying to blame it on cow farts. It's true,
Speaker 1: it's true. The not the the trash processing plants, just
Speaker 1: melting and burning through billions of bottles then throwing them
Speaker 1: all they're waste out into the ocean. Nothing to do
Speaker 1: with any of that, nothing to do with all of
Speaker 1: these private jets fly, and nothing to do with any
Speaker 1: of that. But it's the cows. I thought that was funny. Anyway.
Speaker 1: I don't think that we are contributing in a giant
Speaker 1: negative way to our environment other than the fact that
Speaker 1: we cut down two mini trees. I think that that
Speaker 1: provides a negative impact to environment. And I think because
Speaker 1: I think that that's something people do, that we could
Speaker 1: stop I do. I'm not a big time environmentalist because
Speaker 1: I think that Mother Nature could show us and spit
Speaker 1: us out eventually. But that being said, here's some reasons, right,
Speaker 1: so fifteen unbelievable reasons that prove global warming might be
Speaker 1: a hoax. And these are all valid. That especially that
Speaker 1: we account for ten percent of all greenhouse gases. That
Speaker 1: mostly but here we go. Number one, the climate of
Speaker 1: the Earth is warming up rapidly. If you look at
Speaker 1: the surface temperature index, which is based in the UK
Speaker 1: records show warming to eighteen seventy eight, cooling to nineteen eleven,
Speaker 1: warming to nineteen forty one, cooling to nineteen sixty four,
Speaker 1: warming to nineteen ninety eight, cooling to twenty eleven. You
Speaker 1: see the pattern. See the pattern, you know, everything that
Speaker 1: has happened since the eighteen hundred, since the industrial revolution.
Speaker 1: Now we have eight billion people on the planet, and
Speaker 1: you see it just finished cooling. You see the pattern there. Okay,
Speaker 1: remember that one number two reports show that the global
Speaker 1: climate has been cooling for the past one thousand years overall,
Speaker 1: and recently temperatures have skyrocketed. So they're saying that there's
Speaker 1: ebbs and flows in global temperature that they can prove
Speaker 1: that was happening long before. Well you know, I don't
Speaker 1: know this because I think we used to have past technology,
Speaker 1: but long before any of the admin of modern day technology,
Speaker 1: any long before our quote unquote carbon footprint could be felt,
Speaker 1: which is a joke. It's just a joke of a word.
Speaker 1: It's like it's like saying fossil fuels. There's nothing about
Speaker 1: They only used that from where they found. They dug
Speaker 1: down and found oil, and they found it near fossils.
Speaker 1: They wanted to they wanted to use that term to
Speaker 1: make you think that there wasn't that much oil. Oil
Speaker 1: is the lifeblood of this planet. That was That was
Speaker 1: a scarcity lie. That was propaganda, and it was to
Speaker 1: acquire resources and to put a price on resources and go, figure,
Speaker 1: we have a resource like oil that bases the amount
Speaker 1: of that the dollar's based on. Now, Okay, so just
Speaker 1: if you you gotta be able to see their reasoning here.
Speaker 1: I get it. But it's a lie. It's not a
Speaker 1: fossil fuel, you're not. There's no carbon footprint. Ridiculous, it's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Throughout history, the climate of this planet has fluctuated greatly.
Speaker 1: Many ancient people and religions alike talk about a great
Speaker 1: flood which was probably caused by the melting of ice
Speaker 1: caps or glacier. They don't know that that's this. Okay,
Speaker 1: Hopefully I can read more into this article because I'll
Speaker 1: tear that apart. Recorded history tells us of a warm
Speaker 1: period from around one thousand to twelve hundred AD. That
Speaker 1: it does, which allowed the Vikings to farm crops on greenland.
Speaker 1: This period was followed by a little ice age. Since
Speaker 1: the end of the seventeenth century, the average global temperature
Speaker 1: has been rising at a steady rate, except for the
Speaker 1: period nineteen forty to nineteen seventy in which the climate
Speaker 1: cooled off. Do you remember, remember I always tell you
Speaker 1: that in the seventies they thought there was going to
Speaker 1: be an ice age because the climate started cooling a
Speaker 1: little bit. These are people freaking out and then trying
Speaker 1: to use that to make money. You understand. They always
Speaker 1: try to use this to boost up and build companies
Speaker 1: so that they can try to There's like snake oil
Speaker 1: salesman try to tell you that you have some disease
Speaker 1: that they got the cure for, and then we go
Speaker 1: all in full send on this climate thing. And there's
Speaker 1: only a certain amount of people that make money from it. Okay,
Speaker 1: all right. Three. The rate of carbon dioxide in the
Speaker 1: atmosphere has been directly credited to the human species in
Speaker 1: greenhouse gases, causing the current current warming trend. The carbon
Speaker 1: dioxide level in the atmosphere is fluctuated due to various
Speaker 1: reasons over time. Since the Industrial Revolution, the CO two
Speaker 1: levels in the atmosphere of increase on average of one
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty parts per million. Most of this is
Speaker 1: linked to human cause, and during the current century the
Speaker 1: increase is approximately zo point five to five percent per year.
Speaker 1: Though there isn't there is absolutely no proof that CO
Speaker 1: two is the main driver of global warming, as ancient
Speaker 1: ice core measurements have proven that CO two levels in
Speaker 1: the past have often changed after a temperature drop or increase.
Speaker 1: Solid evidence shows that as temperatures fluctuate naturally through solar radiation.
Speaker 1: What have we been seeing recently? Remember in August a
Speaker 1: ton of a ton of solar flares solar radiation, the
Speaker 1: warming of the surface levels of the planet results in
Speaker 1: more CO two being released into the atmosphere. The ratio
Speaker 1: of man made CO two to natural CO two on
Speaker 1: Earth is about one to twenty four hundred. That means
Speaker 1: man's portion is about two drops. If a twelve ounce
Speaker 1: glass held Earth, CO two two tiny drops. So the
Speaker 1: idea that we are making this giant impact is propaganda
Speaker 1: and it boosts up the businesses that they have ready
Speaker 1: for this problem they created in your mind that they
Speaker 1: plan to profit off of. Okay, number four, the poles
Speaker 1: are warming and ice caps are melting, apparently updated data
Speaker 1: from NASA. You know what, We're not even gonna go
Speaker 1: over number four. I don't trust NASA, nasaizze, don't trust
Speaker 1: a liar. Let's go number five. Computer models are being
Speaker 1: used to calculate the future impacts of CO two. These
Speaker 1: computer models are programmed to assume that CO two is
Speaker 1: the largest climate driver. You see, they always they always
Speaker 1: mess with parts of an equation, and then that's how
Speaker 1: they get their statistics. I think Bill Gates one time
Speaker 1: went over that was one of his favorite books, how
Speaker 1: to manipulate statistics. These computer models can be programmed with
Speaker 1: many variables to conclude that the Earth will cool down
Speaker 1: or warm up, depending on the outcome the programmer intends
Speaker 1: to get. So what is is this confirmation biased at
Speaker 1: its best? Next? Okay, the melting of natural glaciers proves
Speaker 1: global warming question mark. Glaciers have naturally receded and grown
Speaker 1: countless times throughout history. Recent glacier receding is simply an
Speaker 1: outcome of the warming planet. After the little ice Age
Speaker 1: of the early medieval period. There you go, that's enough said.
Speaker 1: Scientists have discovered evidence that the ice caps and glaciers
Speaker 1: have receded and increased in size on numerous occasions throughout
Speaker 1: Earth's history. So it's not because humans technology is causing this, okay.
Speaker 1: Number seven. CO two is a toxin question mark. That's
Speaker 1: a joke. A lot of people believe this, and it
Speaker 1: plays a part in many scientific studies. From a purely
Speaker 1: theoretical standpoint, however, CO two is just as important as
Speaker 1: CO twos. It's as natural as it gets. Heck, guess,
Speaker 1: just as important as nitrogen and oxygen. It plays a
Speaker 1: significant role in bringing about life on Earth. People, it's
Speaker 1: not negative. It's wild. Number eight global warming apparently will
Speaker 1: cause storms in extreme weather. These claims are entirely baseless.
Speaker 1: No evidence exists of the weather being affected by global
Speaker 1: warming on a global scale. Regional variations do occur, but
Speaker 1: there is zero evidence that exists of weather being affected
Speaker 1: by global warming on a global scale. Next, does global
Speaker 1: warming cause a shorter lifespan? Do you know a term
Speaker 1: called glycation? You're cooking naturally like when you're born. This
Speaker 1: is random information from Madellen. When you're born, your ah,
Speaker 1: hold on, use your words. This is what happens when
Speaker 1: you don't write an entire transmission out and you just
Speaker 1: go off the top of your head. Your cartilage. When
Speaker 1: you're a baby, your cartilage is white. When you die,
Speaker 1: say you die old, it's brown. Glycation means cooking. You're
Speaker 1: so you are naturally cooking. You know. The more you know?
Speaker 1: How weird? Is that right? But let's see does it
Speaker 1: called the shorter lifespan? The Earth's climate has been changing
Speaker 1: since the plane and its formation. It didn't crop up
Speaker 1: just because our human race popped up. Throughout history, the
Speaker 1: Earth's climate has oscillated between cold and hot and vice versa.
Speaker 1: In response, we continue to follow the age old pattern
Speaker 1: of adaptation, just as life always does. Okay, so I
Speaker 1: guess you got the answer there. Does CO two form
Speaker 1: the largest part of the greenhouse gases? Greenhouse effect causing
Speaker 1: gases constitute roughly three percent of the total volume of
Speaker 1: the atmosphere. Ninety seven percent of these gases is water,
Speaker 1: vapor and clouds. You know, water vapor like what you
Speaker 1: think what most people think comes out of those planes. Yeah,
Speaker 1: these gases is water, vapor and clouds. And with the
Speaker 1: remaining percentages being gases like CO two, CH four, ozone
Speaker 1: remember the big ozone holes everyone was supposed to be
Speaker 1: scared of and then all of a sudden, we did
Speaker 1: a real good job and they closed up. We changed nothing,
Speaker 1: we created more cars. They stopped following it because it
Speaker 1: was just nonsense. This was ridiculous nonsense. CO two makes
Speaker 1: up about zero point four percent of our atmosphere. Okay,
Speaker 1: so there's another baseless lie all right now eleven Climate
Speaker 1: change is expected to act as a threat multiplier in
Speaker 1: vulnerable regions, intensifying natural disasters, droughts, and resource shortages, potentially
Speaker 1: causing mass migrations. Regarding food and water supplies, global crop
Speaker 1: production has soared. Not to mention, China's trying to take
Speaker 1: control of it. Bill Gates is trying to take control
Speaker 1: of it. And they're telling you that we lack resources.
Speaker 1: That is not the case. They want to control all
Speaker 1: the resources, hold you up in cities and feed you
Speaker 1: bugs and fake meat. And I used to eat the
Speaker 1: fake meat, and I used to eat the plants. But
Speaker 1: after I learned all this, I went back to all natural,
Speaker 1: and I suggest you do too, even if you don't
Speaker 1: like meat. I went without meat for about five years
Speaker 1: and I did a lot of good for my body.
Speaker 1: So but go natural, grow your own food, getting communities
Speaker 1: that grow your own food that way, Listen, when they
Speaker 1: start up in the prices at the grocery store, you
Speaker 1: don't even need them. Who cares? If you grow your
Speaker 1: own food, if you have community gardens, you're gonna be prepared.
Speaker 1: It's all about being prepared because they're always going to
Speaker 1: try to create a crisis that you're gonna have to
Speaker 1: pay for. Okay, now, twelve Sea levels rising. Warmer temperatures
Speaker 1: are causing glaciers and polar ice sheets to melt, increasing
Speaker 1: the amount of water in the world seas and oceans.
Speaker 1: The pace of the sea level rise remained a relative
Speaker 1: constant throughout the twentieth century, even when global temperatures rose gradually.
Speaker 1: In recent decades, there has similarly been no increase in
Speaker 1: the pace of sea level rise. So calm down with
Speaker 1: all that. Thirteen economic consequences. The costs associated with climate
Speaker 1: change rise along with the temperatures. Severe storms and floods,
Speaker 1: combined with agricultural losses coust billions of dollars in damages
Speaker 1: and money is needed to treat and control oldest spread
Speaker 1: of disease. That sounds like the plan that they're going
Speaker 1: with right now. That sounds like the plan they're going
Speaker 1: with right now. Oh also, look up, like the blue
Speaker 1: pearl balls falling from the sky on TikTok, it's from
Speaker 1: cloud seating. So they're cloud seating. And obviously they have
Speaker 1: patents for weather manipulation, and manipulation of storms is obviously happening,
Speaker 1: and it just so happens that this is what they
Speaker 1: say is the cause. So they're ready with the remember
Speaker 1: the biodiversity crisis solutions. They're ready. And this says extreme
Speaker 1: events such as severe storms, floods, and agricultural losses may
Speaker 1: cost a great deal of money, but such costs are
Speaker 1: dramatically declining as the earth modestly warms. Therefore, Edf's asserted
Speaker 1: economic costs are actually economic benefits. So that turned around
Speaker 1: to bite them in the butt. And the people noticing
Speaker 1: the weather manipulation, that's going to turn around, to mark
Speaker 1: my words, that's going to come back on them too.
Speaker 1: All these so called conspiracy theories are going to end
Speaker 1: up being true because they're not. They're very verifiable at
Speaker 1: this day and age, especially when everybody has a recording
Speaker 1: device and people are figuring out what they're actually up to. Okay,
Speaker 1: fourteen thirty one thousand scientists say no convincing evidence, while
Speaker 1: polls of scientists. Remember polls, Remember how good polls did
Speaker 1: in the with the election. I remember I was talking
Speaker 1: about polls. Liberals love to use them, scientists do too.
Speaker 1: While poles of scientists actively working on climate science indicate
Speaker 1: general solid agreement that Earth is warming and human activity
Speaker 1: is a significant factor. I wonder if they polled the
Speaker 1: ones they paid. Probably thirty one thousand scientists say, see,
Speaker 1: there's always another opinion. Thirty one thousand scientists say there's
Speaker 1: no convincing evidence that humans can or will cause catastrophic
Speaker 1: heating of the atmosphere thirty one thousand. But you don't
Speaker 1: hear from those, though. You hear from the one they pay. Okay,
Speaker 1: always funny, and the last one no real proof or evidence.
Speaker 1: According to an article by the Huffington Posts, I hate
Speaker 1: when they source news like this. President Donald Trump told
Speaker 1: the American public about his disbelief in climate change. I
Speaker 1: agree with him there because he didn't see any real evidence.
Speaker 1: Millions of other people have made this comment since twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen election, since the American president pulled out of the
Speaker 1: Paris Accords. I hope he does this time. An agreement
Speaker 1: signed by several countries to change the environmental practices geoengineering
Speaker 1: scientists working on blocking the Sun's rays. See see so, man,
Speaker 1: and imagine this. Imagine if the flat earthers are right
Speaker 1: wink wink, and we're in it under a dome, and
Speaker 1: now they are blocking the Sun's rays, and it's just
Speaker 1: what do you think is gonna happen? I don't know.
Speaker 1: You tell me blocking the Sun's raise to cool the planet.
Speaker 1: Even if we completely stopped carbon dioxide emissions today, the
Speaker 1: Earth will continue warming over the next several decades. See Okay,
Speaker 1: So it's natural ebbs and flows. And there's your reasons.
Speaker 1: If you have a liberal friend, send them to this,
Speaker 1: tell them to argue with me. That's fine because in
Speaker 1: a real one v one argument, I'm destroying whoever on
Speaker 1: this one. It's just it's just too obvious and their
Speaker 1: facts that I've spent hours listening to these people talk
Speaker 1: about this, and I started I remember back in the
Speaker 1: day with Al Gore Gottlie. If you remember the documentary,
Speaker 1: go check out Al Gore. He was he was big,
Speaker 1: that was his role. His role on the stage was
Speaker 1: to push this. Oh and also he had been just anyway,
Speaker 1: thank you. That's my time for today that I think
Speaker 1: is going to be the preface to what the UN,
Speaker 1: the w e F, and the WHO are going to
Speaker 1: be pushing. Everything will be revolved around this, So you
Speaker 1: want to be equipped, You want to be weaponized with
Speaker 1: rebubbles when they come at you with this garbage. So that,
Speaker 1: my friends, is the real story. Again, thank you for
Speaker 1: spending time with me today. As always, be the light
Speaker 1: your friends and family need, but most importantly, always, always,
Speaker 1: always be ready.