Speaker 1: Welcome to the three Stories version of The Todd Herman Show.
Speaker 1: Story number one, are you and by that, I mean
Speaker 1: we strong enough to trust Jesus with the latest so
Speaker 1: called trans murders. Story number two the cracker barrough shareholder
Speaker 1: lawsuits should start with the CEO's bank statements. And story
Speaker 1: number three selling God's masterpieces at bulk discounts. We'll talk
Speaker 1: about this with the help of joined stem cell talks
Speaker 1: dot com. That's where you can submit your question about
Speaker 1: the stem cells from bilical cords that renew for our
Speaker 1: free live webinar to learn about this coming up on
Speaker 1: the eleventh of September eleven am Pacific. It's joined stem
Speaker 1: cell talks dot com.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one percent disapproved by big
Speaker 2: pharma technocrats and tyrn s everywhere from the high mountains
Speaker 2: of Free America. Here's the Emerald City EXI God to
Speaker 2: her Man.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made in these
Speaker 1: of the times to which God has decided we shall live.
Speaker 3: And I have a theory. It's a tough one.
Speaker 1: I've watched this series of latest murders by a very
Speaker 1: gender confused human being, and I'm not saying that's why
Speaker 1: he did this. But I do believe, and so does
Speaker 1: the Diagnostic Statistical Manual, that being convinced that you are
Speaker 1: the opposite sex is a psychoses and that means it's
Speaker 1: a break with reality. And I'm wondering about God's purpose
Speaker 1: for allowing all this, And I'm wondering if God's purpose
Speaker 1: is to see are we strong enough to trust Jesus.
Speaker 1: I got admit when I watched the outcome of this,
Speaker 1: my first response was not.
Speaker 3: Lord, you know what you're doing. It was doubt. It
Speaker 3: was anger, and why wouldn't it be.
Speaker 1: I want to go through some comparisons to responses as
Speaker 1: we build up into this discussion about how Jesus response
Speaker 1: to this, but we can start with two words. Jesus wept.
Speaker 1: It was not supposed to be this way. It was
Speaker 1: not God's choice for us to live with death and
Speaker 1: to live with violence. That was our decision, when we
Speaker 1: decided as a species to turn our back on God
Speaker 1: and say we have a better plan. You warned us
Speaker 1: about the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil,
Speaker 1: but we wanted it. So let's compare some responses. This
Speaker 1: is a young kid, a fifth grader, who praised God
Speaker 1: made it out of the attack, and he has his
Speaker 1: point of view, which I considered to be far more
Speaker 1: mature than what we heard from politicians. This kid had
Speaker 1: been praying when this attack happens, and listen as he
Speaker 1: interacts with the media.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think he's going to be okay. And then
Speaker 4: my friend, he was like laying on top of me,
Speaker 4: like making sure I was safe and he got hit.
Speaker 4: So that was really brave of him.
Speaker 2: And on your neck.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that was I don't even know what it is from.
Speaker 4: Kind of looks like debri ors something.
Speaker 3: That came from doing this. Yeah, what are you feeling?
Speaker 3: You see who you put together in here? Whether that's
Speaker 3: got to be a tough.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm just like confused.
Speaker 1: He's probably in shock, the poor little boy and communicating
Speaker 1: so clearly. No greater love has man than to lay
Speaker 1: down his life for his brother. Someone did that? Now,
Speaker 1: Praise God. That little boy is not dying, it appears
Speaker 1: according to him. So are we willing to trust Jesus
Speaker 1: in situations like this? That little boy laid his body
Speaker 1: down on top of another little boy to save him.
Speaker 1: No greater love has man, we see it. Are we
Speaker 1: brave enough to tout Jesus? To know that the kids
Speaker 1: who died praying to him went straight to him. Are
Speaker 1: we brave enough for that? Are we brave enough to
Speaker 1: remember that at the Trum of Lazarus. There's a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of debates as to why Jesus wept, but we
Speaker 1: know he wept in the face of death, the stench
Speaker 1: of it. But I also happen to believe that the
Speaker 1: subtext of this is he told people who he was,
Speaker 1: and people said, Lord Lord, if you'd been here, my
Speaker 1: brother would have not died. And Jesus, I wonder if
Speaker 1: he was weeping that. You still don't get it. I
Speaker 1: control death completely. It has no it is nothing I
Speaker 1: can't stop. It has a meaning to you, It does
Speaker 1: not to me. The little ones who died, I believe,
Speaker 1: went straight into the arms of the Lord Jesus, and
Speaker 1: he was overjoyed to see them. Because this is what
Speaker 1: we're told in the Bible. So let's compare this to
Speaker 1: the mayor of Minneapolis who decides to do something you
Speaker 1: can't do. I trust God when he says he will
Speaker 1: not be mocked. The Bible tells us God will not
Speaker 1: be mocked. The mayor of Minneapolis, Jacob Fray, apparently doesn't
Speaker 1: believe that.
Speaker 5: And don't just say this is about thoughts and prayers
Speaker 5: right now. These kids were literally praying. It was the
Speaker 5: first week of school, they were in a church. These
Speaker 5: are kids that should be learning with their friends. They
Speaker 5: should be playing on the playground. They should be able
Speaker 5: to go to school or church in peace without the
Speaker 5: fear or risk of violence, and their parents should have
Speaker 5: the same kind of assurance.
Speaker 1: This is the same guy who came out to mock
Speaker 1: thoughts and prayers. This is the same guy who came
Speaker 1: out and said his priority was in fact, protecting the
Speaker 1: so called transcommunity from hate. So are we brave enough
Speaker 1: to touch Jesus in these circumstances because we were told
Speaker 1: there would come a time where most people's hearts would
Speaker 1: grow cold, where people would teach, would seek teachers who
Speaker 1: would tickle their itching ears tell them falsehoods. And people
Speaker 1: are being told falsehoods like kids are being told you
Speaker 1: were born in the wrong body. It's falsehood, and it's
Speaker 1: being promoted and propagated, and it's harmful when kids break
Speaker 1: from reality. But we're also told this, if thoughts and
Speaker 1: prayers don't matter, that would mean that there's no spiritual
Speaker 1: overtones to this. The entire thing has spiritual overtones to it.
Speaker 1: A young man confused about his gender and this is
Speaker 1: promoted and it's good and it's healthy, and you're brave
Speaker 1: and you're stunning, and change your name, and here's a
Speaker 1: legal document. Now you're legally a woman. And if the
Speaker 1: rest of the world doesn't get it, it's because the
Speaker 1: rest of the world is their haters.
Speaker 3: That's why they don't get it.
Speaker 1: And if you doubt there is an overtone too this,
Speaker 1: let me tell you about one of his drawings, because
Speaker 1: one of the drawings washes as clear of any delusions
Speaker 1: on this, or at least it should. I know that
Speaker 1: you want to wash your body clear of things you
Speaker 1: get dirt during the day, sweat, et cetera. I don't
Speaker 1: mean to be super super blunt, but I just do
Speaker 1: mean to be very very clear. The companies you're buying
Speaker 1: soap from probably don't care about your values. For instance,
Speaker 1: you probably believe all lives matter. At alansoaps dot Com,
Speaker 1: Sash Todd, we believe that, and we employ people that
Speaker 1: the rest of the world would have seen unalived in
Speaker 1: the womb. And I'm not saying maybe this is what
Speaker 1: doctors wanted to do to Alan and his brother Ian. Well,
Speaker 1: his parents said no, and so their kids can have
Speaker 1: a place to work and other young people like them.
Speaker 1: They invented Alan Soaps and turned to a family that
Speaker 1: makes soap as a love affair. They've done it for
Speaker 1: three generations. Hence the soap is all natural. It's made
Speaker 1: in America. I think it's in Pennsylvania. I know it's
Speaker 1: in the Midwest. Has no chemicals in it, and it's
Speaker 1: as gentle as it can be in your skin. And
Speaker 1: it promotes work for the kids and other young people
Speaker 1: who are told you're worthless to society.
Speaker 3: They're not. We love them.
Speaker 1: It's Alan Soaps dot com slash todd. Get ten percent
Speaker 1: off all the products there. That's Alansoaps dot com slash Todd.
Speaker 1: If you're watching this, it's a difficult image to wash
Speaker 1: out of your mind. This comes from the notebook of
Speaker 1: the shooter, the murder who used a gun. I say
Speaker 1: that because shooter implies it's just the gun that did it.
Speaker 1: It's an image of him with the gun on his back,
Speaker 1: looking into a mirror and looking back at him as
Speaker 1: a demon.
Speaker 3: And if you do not.
Speaker 1: Believe in the spiritual overtones of this, then think again
Speaker 1: about the target, the most innocent beings. You can find
Speaker 1: little kids in the most innocent moment praying. It is
Speaker 1: an attempt to mock God.
Speaker 3: And I've seen it. I've seen members of the left
Speaker 3: come out and.
Speaker 1: Say, hey, if prayer works, Hakkama didn't protect the kids
Speaker 1: who were praying. Because God did not design us to
Speaker 1: be in a broken world.
Speaker 3: We chose the broken world. And when you remove prayer
Speaker 3: from society as a whole, you.
Speaker 1: Remove a connection to God. Now you can say, look,
Speaker 1: I believe in God. I just don't spend a lot
Speaker 1: of time praying. I believe in God. I just don't
Speaker 1: go to church. I believe in God, I just don't
Speaker 1: read the Bible. Then you don't know God. And Jesus
Speaker 1: tells us even people who believe in him, even people
Speaker 1: who've done miracles, like you could say, look, I feed
Speaker 1: the poor. I've got a nonprofit I feed the poor.
Speaker 1: Certainly I'm going to heaven. And Jesus has told us, no, wait,
Speaker 1: I don't know you. I can't confess you with my mouth.
Speaker 1: You haven't confessed me with yours. I trust Jesus when
Speaker 1: he tells us that there's going to be times like this.
Speaker 1: I trust God when he says, when you install human
Speaker 1: kings instead of me, you're gonna end up with kings
Speaker 1: who seek to enrich themselves. And this is one of
Speaker 1: the things that's been going on with promoting this psychosis,
Speaker 1: this mental illness, this tragedy of kids being confused about
Speaker 1: their gender. It's a money making enterprise. It's a power
Speaker 1: seeking enterprise for politicians on the left, money making for
Speaker 1: people in pharma and for medical devices, and for Madison
Speaker 1: Avenue who can now sell specific lines of clothing to
Speaker 1: little kids like they sell these packers for babies, so baby,
Speaker 1: little girls below the age four.
Speaker 3: Can pretend to be boys.
Speaker 1: Are we brave enough to touch Jesus When Jesus said,
Speaker 1: when God explained that he has made us in his image,
Speaker 1: that he counted every hair in her head, that he
Speaker 1: has specific plans for us, are we willing to trust
Speaker 1: the sacrifice?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 3: See this goes straight to this, this unaliving of these kids.
Speaker 3: It's a brutal act.
Speaker 1: Jesus knows what that feels like. The Lord of the
Speaker 1: universe knows what that feels like. He knows what it
Speaker 1: feels like to be unlived in brutal fashion. God the
Speaker 1: Father knows what it's like to watch his own son.
Speaker 1: They're relatable. A single God and multiple in three personalities
Speaker 1: knows what it is to be in pain this way.
Speaker 1: Can we trust that Jesus had a purpose and perhaps
Speaker 1: the purpose is for more people to understand the spiritual
Speaker 1: connection to this and let's go back and compare again responses.
Speaker 1: There are prayer vigils going on. Some of the kids
Speaker 1: who survived this went back into a prayer vigil. There
Speaker 1: are people talking about SSRIs. Hey was this kid on
Speaker 1: too many SSRIs? There are people talking about what is
Speaker 1: the connection between having a break with reality? As the
Speaker 1: DMS five refers to genderdics for you, it's a psychosis.
Speaker 1: So with this break from reality, should we look into this?
Speaker 1: Maybe this is a symptom. Maybe this should be treated
Speaker 1: as a call for help. On the other hand, you
Speaker 1: have again Jacob Fray going back at what he thinks
Speaker 1: needs to be done.
Speaker 5: I have heard about a whole lot of hate that's
Speaker 5: being directed at our trans community. Anybody who is using
Speaker 5: this as an using this as an opportunity to villainize
Speaker 5: our trans community or any other community out there has
Speaker 5: lost their sense of common humanity. We should not be
Speaker 5: operating out of a place of hate for anyone. We
Speaker 5: should be operating from a place of love for our kids.
Speaker 3: Kids died today. This needs to be about them.
Speaker 5: This needs to be wrapping our arms around these families
Speaker 5: with every bit of love that we can possibly show them.
Speaker 1: Let's do that to the families whose other kids are
Speaker 1: confused about their gender. Does it strike you as a
Speaker 1: call for help, Let's have love for the kids who
Speaker 1: went through this by not standing by and ignoring one
Speaker 1: of the symptoms of this. When you speak of good
Speaker 1: and evil, you're speaking of sides. And when you think
Speaker 1: about what Jesus spoke about in terms of the devil,
Speaker 1: who is he? He's a liar, thief, and a murder
Speaker 1: from the beginning. How does he behave angel of light?
Speaker 1: He masquades as an angel of light. The masquerading lie
Speaker 1: here is that affirmation only is the way to go.
Speaker 1: But try this in any other sense. If you had
Speaker 1: a kid who came to you and said, you know what,
Speaker 1: I am adopted, and you had proof, you had the
Speaker 1: video of the child being born, and the child said, no,
Speaker 1: that's not me. I refuse to believe it's now affirm me.
Speaker 3: Would you? Could you?
Speaker 1: By the same logic, you should because we have pictures
Speaker 1: of them as boys and girls, and the question is
Speaker 1: can we trust Jesus?
Speaker 3: Is there a reason for this? Yes?
Speaker 1: How do I know this? Because I know the being
Speaker 1: who allowed it to happen. And maybe the reason is this.
Speaker 1: Some people somewhere have woken up and had their final
Speaker 1: dose of reality and have said it's just too broken.
Speaker 1: This can't be explained humanly. This can't be explained in
Speaker 1: a scientific sense. There's something deeply spiritual going on. I
Speaker 1: say that because every single week at our church in
Speaker 1: North Idaho, we get exiled families from the separate countries
Speaker 1: like California and Washington coming in and saying the same thing.
Speaker 3: I trust that Jesus has a plan.
Speaker 1: Story number two, The Cracker Barrel shareholder lawsuit should start
Speaker 1: with the CEO's bank statements. You know, because I did
Speaker 1: the todtter Herman Show radio shows for all those years
Speaker 1: and still continue to do it. Obviously taught Herman Show
Speaker 1: radio shows. I lived in a world where we talked
Speaker 1: about living the brand. This is something we used to
Speaker 1: say in music radio and I worked in music radio
Speaker 1: for a very brief period of time. But if you're
Speaker 1: going to be successful in music radio, it's important that
Speaker 1: you live the brand. So if you have an ACR station,
Speaker 1: you need to be able to communicate with the ACR
Speaker 1: audience by hanging out with them. And if you're running
Speaker 1: a country music station, you need to be able to
Speaker 1: learn to hang out with country music fans and get
Speaker 1: to know them. Living the lifestyle means you're being genuine,
Speaker 1: particularly if you're an on air personality. Now if you're
Speaker 1: in sales or management, maybe that's a little bit different,
Speaker 1: unless you're a program director, and then you need to
Speaker 1: be able to speak with them in ways that they
Speaker 1: will understand. So much about what happened at Cracker Barrel
Speaker 1: indicates to me that this is no longer understood or
Speaker 1: even cared for, which is why I say, in the
Speaker 1: upcoming lawsuit, the shareholder lawsuit, and there's got to be one,
Speaker 1: they should start with the CEO's bank records because of
Speaker 1: the glasses she wore.
Speaker 3: Literally, the glasses.
Speaker 1: She wore mapped up to an in depth insider analysis
Speaker 1: into her moves to quote refine the brand of Cracker Barrel.
Speaker 1: So let's explain this in just a second. I actually
Speaker 1: had a chance to talk with my friend Zach Abraham
Speaker 1: about this. Zach is the chief investment officer Bulwart Capital
Speaker 1: Management that Know Your riskradio dot com.
Speaker 3: He sits on some boards.
Speaker 1: He thinks the board of Cracker Burrel should be fired
Speaker 1: for what they've done. And he agrees with me that
Speaker 1: the lifestyle thing is very, very important. Your lifestyle is
Speaker 1: important to you. What's going on in our country is
Speaker 1: the battle for the existence of the American economy as
Speaker 1: a dominant force or as a subservient force. You are
Speaker 1: on a precipice, and if you're about to retire, if
Speaker 1: you're five to ten, even fifteen years from retirement, you
Speaker 1: would really be a silly goose. That's a technical phrase,
Speaker 1: a silly goose. If you didn't take Zach up on
Speaker 1: his free opportunity to have a no obligation series of
Speaker 1: meetings where he will give you a second opinion on
Speaker 1: your retirement plan, you will end these three meetings understanding
Speaker 1: what Zach thinks you are at where you're at in
Speaker 1: terms of getting to retirement. Are you exposed to too
Speaker 1: much risk? Are you being actively managed? Because active management
Speaker 1: portfolios can reduce risk and volatility. So go find out.
Speaker 1: Go to Know Your Risk podcast dot com. That's Know
Speaker 1: Your Risk Podcast dot com. Investment advice to services off
Speaker 1: their Trek Financial LLC and sec Regiter Investment Advisor.
Speaker 3: Investments involved risk and are not guaranteed past.
Speaker 1: Performance, dosn't guarantee future results Trek twenty five, DASH two
Speaker 1: five to two. The upcoming lawsuit should start with the
Speaker 1: glasses and then the bank account. Here's why I say
Speaker 1: that it was a fascinating dynamic to see Twitter users
Speaker 1: see the glasses of the CEO of Cracker Barrel, Julie
Speaker 1: Fel's messino, and based upon that say the brand is
Speaker 1: in trouble. Those glasses are a uniform for many many people.
Speaker 1: They're the uniform of wanting to be on MSNBC as
Speaker 1: a co commentator. They're the uniform of smart glasses. Is
Speaker 1: a leftist thinker. Leftism in brands like Cracker Barrew cannot
Speaker 1: coexist because the brand Cracker Barrel was built around a
Speaker 1: nineteen twenties nostalgic memory of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Leftism does not like the United States of America, particularly
Speaker 1: not back in the nineteen twenties or in the founding era.
Speaker 1: They want to envision the future unburdened by the past.
Speaker 1: In Cammy Harris Gibberish, so people saw the glasses and
Speaker 1: they said this will and poorly. There's the fourteen percent
Speaker 1: stock dip. The glasses were the indicator. I'm saying, her
Speaker 1: personal bank account is what the lawsuit should really dig into,
Speaker 1: and it's not even the big money she makes as
Speaker 1: Cracker Burrew. I want to see her last five year
Speaker 1: bank records, debit cards and credit cards. I want her
Speaker 1: entire spending pattern for the last five years because I
Speaker 1: have a theory. There's an investor. His name is sar
Speaker 1: Dar Big Laurie, and this comes from Fox Business News.
Speaker 1: Arson Nomani wrote a great article that this guy is
Speaker 1: a major investor in Crackerburrow so happens to own Steak
Speaker 1: and Shake. He warned the board, this is going to
Speaker 1: be catastrophic. He responded to Julie Fellow's memo she was
Speaker 1: viewing a transformation planned strategic transformation to quote refine the brand.
Speaker 1: He came out and said, no, the brand's fine. What
Speaker 1: we need is a churnaround. We've got a broken board,
Speaker 1: not a broken company. Cracker Barrel's not broken.
Speaker 3: The board is.
Speaker 1: He warned the company about a coming catastrophe. He actually
Speaker 1: created one hundred and twenty page PowerPoint slide deck with
Speaker 1: the presentation titled Cracker Barrel is in crisis in red.
Speaker 1: This was on October twenty fourth, twenty twenty four. For
Speaker 1: an investor to spend his time creating something like this
Speaker 1: and then to be ignored is extraordinary. This is why
Speaker 1: I think the lawsuit will happen. The CEO and the
Speaker 1: board rejected Sedar Big Glory's criticism, and he published another
Speaker 1: slide deck warning again about the catastrophe that was to come.
Speaker 1: And now we know the catastrophe came. The stock has dumped.
Speaker 1: People have woken up to the fact that this is
Speaker 1: a woke company and it's going to continue to harm
Speaker 1: them unless they fire the board of the CEO and
Speaker 1: apologize for losing their way. So why her bank accounts.
Speaker 1: I've been to Cracker Barrel maybe three times. It's okay food,
Speaker 1: it's not my thing. I like the entire interior. I
Speaker 1: think it's funky. I like the sense of nostalgia that
Speaker 1: I like. It's just not my bag for food or
Speaker 1: is it hers I'm gonna bet. I don't know this
Speaker 1: to be the case, and I don't want to wish
Speaker 1: for bearing false witness. I'm not gonna say it's true,
Speaker 1: but I'm willing to bet. If you went back to
Speaker 1: her last five year bank records and spending records, do
Speaker 1: you think she was a big fan of Cracker Barrel?
Speaker 1: Do you think she likes comfort foods? If you're looking
Speaker 1: to her spending patterns, do you think you'd see anything
Speaker 1: that supports a nostalgia for historic America? Or do you
Speaker 1: think you'd find the opposite, Someone who disdains the historical America,
Speaker 1: who disdains the founding, who can't wait to drag Cracker
Speaker 1: Barrel into modern society, where they also shun all things
Speaker 1: not invented before twenty twenty. Story number three selling God's
Speaker 1: masterpieces at bulk discounts. I am not against in vitro fertilization.
Speaker 1: I am against selling God's creations at bulk discounts. I
Speaker 1: have friends of mine who had to turn to in
Speaker 1: vitro fertilization because they were unable to conceive children without it,
Speaker 1: And they're the exact short of people we want to
Speaker 1: be parents, and they gave thoughts to doing this the
Speaker 1: old fashioned way, because parental surrogacy is as old as
Speaker 1: the Bible, and in many cases in the Bible, people
Speaker 1: carried this out through their own wishes and it turned
Speaker 1: out to be Yeah, they got kids, but they also
Speaker 1: got themselves disasters. This is not the new way of thinking.
Speaker 1: It's just done at new scale and with new people,
Speaker 1: and done with far less care for the kids who
Speaker 1: result in this. In the Bible, read about Abram before
Speaker 1: he became Abraham, being promised to have multiple multiple kids,
Speaker 1: and his wife Sarah, who was very ild, didn't think
Speaker 1: this was going to happen. They got frustrated God's plan
Speaker 1: was not working. He had his timing wrong.
Speaker 3: God was late.
Speaker 1: God is never late, and his timing is never wrong.
Speaker 1: But that's how they felt. So Sarah took it under
Speaker 1: herself to allow.
Speaker 3: Abram to lay with her handmaid, her.
Speaker 1: Servant, and they conceived the child, and the united the
Speaker 1: united nature of the people at that time split. This
Speaker 1: is one of the splittings of mankinds along theological lines.
Speaker 3: We live with this to this day. That mistake.
Speaker 1: Now, the life was a blessing, the son was a blessing,
Speaker 1: The splitting of mankind continues to be a curse. It
Speaker 1: was not God's plan. Now is it God's plan that
Speaker 1: there's in virtual fertilization. I don't know. I know he
Speaker 1: said to be free, full, and multiply. I know he
Speaker 1: allows us to look into how our bodies are made.
Speaker 1: I know he signed his work. I consider DNA to
Speaker 1: be God's signed work. I consider it to be language,
Speaker 1: well because it is. It's readable, it's understandable, it's repeatable,
Speaker 1: it's falsifiable. It's language just like any other language. And
Speaker 1: I believe it's God's beautiful signature. I believe the skies
Speaker 1: are a signature. I believe the very outcome of our
Speaker 1: bodies are a signature. And then I know the Bible
Speaker 1: tells us God made us in his image. Therefore I
Speaker 1: know these things are his signature. He also calls us
Speaker 1: his masterpiece. So I'm not against in vitro fertilization. I'm
Speaker 1: not against surrogacy. I'm against doing it in bulk, and
Speaker 1: particularly when it's being done as people, for people who
Speaker 1: seem to be treating kids as an accessory at them,
Speaker 1: like a line of shoes or a series of purses,
Speaker 1: and they seem to see that often. It also deeply
Speaker 1: concerns me that men, and it's usually men who have
Speaker 1: no business being around any kids at all, are allowed
Speaker 1: to purchase babies in bulk, sometimes not in bulk, sometimes individually.
Speaker 1: So it's not that I'm against the IVF, it's I'm
Speaker 1: against it in bulk.
Speaker 3: This starts with me for a look at.
Speaker 1: How our bodies come together, how we're knit together in
Speaker 1: our mother's womb. This is this is a time time
Speaker 1: lapse video of us being knit together.
Speaker 3: In our mother's womb.
Speaker 1: This is a sixteen hour time lapse of an embryo
Speaker 1: forming its spinal cords. And as you see the pieces
Speaker 1: begin to come together, look at the structure, look at
Speaker 1: the plan as it begins. That happens in the womb
Speaker 1: because DNA says, here's how you build it, and you
Speaker 1: could track that throughout the entire creation of a human being.
Speaker 1: So when God said we are knit together in the womb,
Speaker 1: that He's counted every hair in our heads. Christians have
Speaker 1: to believe this. And if you're not Christian, you don't
Speaker 1: believe in God. You need to explain to me this
Speaker 1: how random mutation got us to that point and where
Speaker 1: we're missing, and how can we do not see all
Speaker 1: sorts of transitional fossils, and why we don't see human
Speaker 1: beings continuing to mutate. I know billions and billions in
Speaker 1: billions of beers. Again, you have no real transitional species
Speaker 1: to go back and point two. At no point can
Speaker 1: you point to a giraffe that had a short neck.
Speaker 1: They didn't happen that way, or a honey bee that
Speaker 1: couldn't fly backwards. They've always had that ability. So God's
Speaker 1: design is so miraculous that it should not be sold
Speaker 1: at bulk discounts. This is a man who's describing the
Speaker 1: links to which he and his partner went to have
Speaker 1: the perfect baby. So they purchased forty eggs and maybe
Speaker 1: they got a bulk discount.
Speaker 6: Quick recap. We're having two babies. We bought forty frozen
Speaker 6: eggs from our egg donor. Twenty eight of those eggs
Speaker 6: survive the thying process in them were fertilized. Twelve of
Speaker 6: those fertilized eggs did not develop into usable embryos. So
Speaker 6: that make sixteen embryos that were sent to PGT testing
Speaker 6: and we.
Speaker 1: So some of them did develop, but they chose not
Speaker 1: to allow them to continue to life unless you believe
Speaker 1: that life begins at conception as I do.
Speaker 3: Well. That creates an ethical dilemma, doesn't it.
Speaker 6: Us got in those PGT testing results, starting with Joshua side,
Speaker 6: his one embryo that was rated good to average came
Speaker 6: back as chaotic, which checks out that one is no
Speaker 6: longer usable. This one, which was originally graded good, came
Speaker 6: back annuploid. Chromosome thirteen only had one in the pair.
Speaker 6: On my side, the one that was originally graded as
Speaker 6: bad indeed came back annuploid. It's chromosome thirteen also only
Speaker 6: had one in the pair. This one, which was originally
Speaker 6: graded as good, came back with no DNA detected, so
Speaker 6: that's no longer usable. This one, too, which was also
Speaker 6: originally graded as good, came back annuploid. Chromosome number four
Speaker 6: only had one in the pair. Lastly, this one, which
Speaker 6: was originally graded good to average, came back as high.
Speaker 6: Mosaic chromoson number two had three when it was supposed
Speaker 6: to have two. All in all, were so happy that
Speaker 6: we decided to purchase as many ros and eggs as
Speaker 6: we could forty because that leaves us with these ten
Speaker 6: embryos for two babies, and we're told that the majority
Speaker 6: of journeys take two to three transfers to get pregnant.
Speaker 6: We've decided which embryo on both sides that we want
Speaker 6: to transfer to our two surrogates. Will keep you updated
Speaker 6: as we do the transfers and as we find out
Speaker 6: whether or not we're pregnant, and continue to be transparent
Speaker 6: of how many transfers it takes. But we're not going
Speaker 6: to share the sex of both babies until we're officially pregnant,
Speaker 6: just like any other expecting parents would. Thanks for following
Speaker 6: along and we're excited to keep you updated.
Speaker 1: How do you feel at that a bulk purchase of
Speaker 1: human eggs? Now again, I have friends who've done this
Speaker 1: and yep, they're opposite sex attracted.
Speaker 3: And they're married. And that's better.
Speaker 1: Because kids deserve to have the experience of having a
Speaker 1: male and female parent. Because Gods said it is not
Speaker 1: good that man is alone. He did not create another
Speaker 1: man for him. I know that sounds like the bigoted
Speaker 1: Adam and Eve versus Adam and Steve thing. I get that,
Speaker 1: and we can talk through same sex attraction and the
Speaker 1: difficulty it must be to experience that and to know
Speaker 1: that this is not God's plan, and to have to
Speaker 1: deal with that like people who are sex addicts or
Speaker 1: addicts of seeing sexual acts on phones, etc. It's very
Speaker 1: difficult and it's not the topic of this particular segment.
Speaker 1: What is the topic is the purchasing in bulk. So
Speaker 1: am I more bothered that it sees two many?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I am because I believe kids have a right to
Speaker 1: parents of opposite sex, because God created a compliment between
Speaker 1: male and female. They're things men are greater, ats are
Speaker 1: better at than women. Likewise, and I know there's are generalities.
Speaker 1: It's the purchasing in bulk that bothers me. Nearly two
Speaker 1: dozen children receies from a Los Angeles couple accused of
Speaker 1: running a surrogacy scam. Two dozen, that's twenty four kids.
Speaker 1: And this this is from next Shark at Yahoo News.
Speaker 1: Nearly two dozen children sees from Los Angeles couple accused
Speaker 1: of surrogacy scam. Authorities removed twenty one children from the
Speaker 1: custody of a Los Angeles couple after discovering a surrogacy
Speaker 1: operation that allegedly deceived multiple surrogate mothers.
Speaker 3: Across the country. Business busted.
Speaker 1: The investigigation began in May second when a two month
Speaker 1: old baby was hospitalized with head injuries, prompting police to respond. Soon,
Speaker 1: officers discovered fifteen more infants than toddlers under the care
Speaker 1: of six nannies at a nine bedroom mansion in Arcadia.
Speaker 1: Surveillance footage revealed physical abuse of the children, including one
Speaker 1: nanny shaking the injured infant. Ghan Juan sixty five and
Speaker 1: Sylvia Soong thirty eight, were arrested on May nine on
Speaker 1: suspicion of fairly child endangerment, but released four days later
Speaker 1: without charges. Six more children were later removed from other locations,
Speaker 1: bringing the totals to twenty one children under thirteen years
Speaker 1: of age. How the scam ran, Juan and Zang operated
Speaker 1: their business, Mark Surrogacy from their Arcadia home, recruiting through Facebook.
Speaker 1: Zang allegedly provided different accounts to various surrogates, telling some
Speaker 1: she had only one daughter. Court records, on the other hand,
Speaker 1: show she told a Los Angeles judge she and Juan
Speaker 1: had at least a dozen children. Surrogates were allegedly paid
Speaker 1: tens of thousands of dollars each and told they were
Speaker 1: helping a couple was struggling with infertility. Police responded to
Speaker 1: at least six calls at the property since January twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two, including some reports of suspected child abuse and
Speaker 1: illegal business operations. The big picture, the case highlights regulatory
Speaker 1: gaps and commercial surrogacy industry, particularly involving international clients seeking
Speaker 1: US citizenship for newborns. Research shows that between twenty fourteen
Speaker 1: and twenty twenty, forty one point seven percent of foreign
Speaker 1: intended parents using US surgate services were Chinese nationals. Zang
Speaker 1: told investigators she wanted many children after seeing how China's
Speaker 1: one child policy had damage families. It's in bulk, and
Speaker 1: my friend Katie Faust, who tracks these things with them
Speaker 1: before US, has some commentary about this, and that is
Speaker 1: that it's not a swindle.
Speaker 3: This is house does mind.
Speaker 1: In separate countries like Washington State, you can actually purchase
Speaker 1: kids upfront. You can purchase them and the thing you
Speaker 1: have to do to take them home will astonish you,
Speaker 1: as well as the thing you don't have to do
Speaker 1: to take them home. I'll talk about that in a second,
Speaker 1: as well as the reality is what goes on in
Speaker 1: the womb between twins. My friend Katie Fauss Organization also
Speaker 1: posted that there's a lot that goes in our bodies
Speaker 1: that can go unnoticed, and as you age, things can
Speaker 1: add up over time. Right, you can suddenly end up
Speaker 1: with this or that ache or pain. What's very common
Speaker 1: for people is to realize, man, I've put on a
Speaker 1: ton of weight, and if you're above the age of forty,
Speaker 1: it can be really, really difficult to take that weight
Speaker 1: off or keep yourself at a good body weight. There's
Speaker 1: a hack I'm aware of, and I became aware of
Speaker 1: because I started using it for insulin resistance. As moniocal
Speaker 1: as I am about my diet, I track every macronutrients.
Speaker 1: I drink three hundred and sixty ounces of water every day,
Speaker 1: exercise for two to two and a half hours a day,
Speaker 1: five to six days a week. I was shocked on
Speaker 1: I had insulin resistance, so I started to take Bourbing Breakthrough.
Speaker 1: As I've learned about this product and how it works,
Speaker 1: it occurred to me, this is fantastic for weight loss,
Speaker 1: and in fact, Bioptimizers says the same thing. This product
Speaker 1: Bourbing Breakthrough energizes your mitochondria and these are the energy
Speaker 1: centers in your cell. Their job is to take fat
Speaker 1: and utilize it for energy. The other option is to
Speaker 1: shorter on your mid section or your thighs, or wherever
Speaker 1: your body stores fat. So if you're sick of having
Speaker 1: your fat burning switch turned off, then this is a
Speaker 1: way to turn it on. Go to bob demizers dot
Speaker 1: com slash todd, use promo code todd to release, receive
Speaker 1: fifteen percent off.
Speaker 3: Subscribe. You'll get free.
Speaker 1: Discounts, more discounts, you get exclusive gifts, you get exclusive
Speaker 1: information packs, and your monthly supply will be guaranteed as
Speaker 1: bip demizers dot com slash todd promo code todd for
Speaker 1: fifteen percent off. Bip deemisers dot com slash todd. Them
Speaker 1: before us is my friend, Katie Foules, organization that fights
Speaker 1: for the rights of children to know their parents, and
Speaker 1: she writes this on Twitter or at least organization does.
Speaker 1: Studies show that twins begin interacting with each other as
Speaker 1: early as fourteen weeks. By eighteen weeks, twins are touching
Speaker 1: each other's faces, hands, and even holding hands or hugging.
Speaker 1: This surrogacy won't only sever him from his mom, it
Speaker 1: destroys the bond between babies too cruel. Now Katie is
Speaker 1: completely against surrogacy unless it's between families, and even then
Speaker 1: she's suspect of it. But on a massive industrial scale,
Speaker 1: it is becoming very very clear that this is going
Speaker 1: to be used for distinct evil. In the separate country
Speaker 1: of Washington State, you can bring eighteen, twenty, even twenty
Speaker 1: two women, the number is just cap by your money.
Speaker 1: You can bring them into the separate country of Washington,
Speaker 1: have them impregnated. They stay there, the babies just date
Speaker 1: and as long as you visit one single time during
Speaker 1: the gestation once you can come back and at the
Speaker 1: ninth month.
Speaker 3: Take all the babies to wherever you live.
Speaker 1: Now, that's following, of course, a big, big background check
Speaker 1: like they do with adoptions. You know, when you adopt
Speaker 1: a baby, you need to go through these big background checks.
Speaker 3: Oh I'm just kidding.
Speaker 1: No, No, In the case of the book purchase of
Speaker 1: the babies, there's no background check.
Speaker 3: Just bye bye, enjoy the kids.
Speaker 2: Them.
Speaker 1: Before US has tracked fourteen or fifteen cases of people
Speaker 1: with criminal backgrounds who choose to use bulk commercial surrogacy
Speaker 1: to purchase children. Some of them already had plans to
Speaker 1: exploit the children in the worst possible ways that was
Speaker 1: already part of the plan. There are people in courts,
Speaker 1: there are people going to prison for having done this
Speaker 1: through commercial surrogacy in bulk. DC Dreno on Twitter points
Speaker 1: this out. This has become a mainstream story for people
Speaker 1: who track such things. We come to Pennsylvania were a
Speaker 1: man convicted of violating children has been banned with contact
Speaker 1: from children. He's not to contact children, it's illegal, but
Speaker 1: he was able to adopt a baby via surgacy.
Speaker 3: Insane.
Speaker 1: It is insane, and this is one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why I'm against bulk levels of commercial surrogacy. On the
Speaker 1: let's say, I don't know, hysterical libertarian side of things,
Speaker 1: Richard Hannania wrote, is opposition to surrogacy the worst political position.
Speaker 1: It has at least unusual combination of a lot of
Speaker 1: bad traits. Totalitarian, anti market, dysgenic, anti life, anti utilitarian,
Speaker 1: naturalistic fallacy.
Speaker 3: It's anti life.
Speaker 1: What sort of life did the eggs that those guys
Speaker 1: rejected when they bought them? In bulkcalf Even the UN
Speaker 1: is talking about violence and exploitation of women through surgacy.
Speaker 1: Even the UN is doing that. So is a brave
Speaker 1: therapist named Stephanie Wynn. She talks about the feminism of
Speaker 1: freedom versus the feminism of caring.
Speaker 7: I'm curious if you've been following the work of Mary
Speaker 7: Herringpen lately. Yes, right, So she talks about feminism of
Speaker 7: freedom versus the feminism of care, and I've never heard
Speaker 7: anyone put it that way until recently. But it makes
Speaker 7: you think, you know, when I listen to all these
Speaker 7: interviews that I've been listening to with Mary Hairton, thinking like, Yeah,
Speaker 7: who convinced us as women that our primary value was
Speaker 7: around autonomy? Not that our freedom isn't important. Of course
Speaker 7: it's important. I value my freedom. I'm not saying I
Speaker 7: want to be oppressed, But who convinced us and whose
Speaker 7: idea was it that that should be our primary guiding
Speaker 7: value when actually so much of what it is to
Speaker 7: be a woman is to be a caregiver.
Speaker 1: A caregiver not an eggmaker. There's a big difference. God's
Speaker 1: intended us to be fruitful and multiply. I see nothing
Speaker 1: there where he said, plus make a lot of money
Speaker 1: selling my children in bulk. After all, they're just my masterpieces.
Speaker 1: I stand against selling God's masterpieces at any point, even
Speaker 1: at bulk discounts, even if it's masquerading an Angel of light.
Speaker 1: Stuff you know, to fulfill people who biologically are incapable
Speaker 1: of having kids.
Speaker 3: This is the Todd Hermannshaw.
Speaker 1: Please go, be well, be strong, be kind, and please
Speaker 1: make every effort to walk in the light of Christ.