Speaker 1: The following presentation isn't del Marvis Studio's production.
Speaker 2: Welcome back to secures from around the world.
Speaker 3: It's time for another edition of the Fact Hunter podcast
Speaker 3: as we record on this lunchtime Wednesday, July twenty second,
Speaker 3: twenty twenty six, kind of an impromptu episode. You know,
Speaker 3: there's a lot of rabbit holes even though we've been
Speaker 3: doing this for six years, that we've yet to go down.
Speaker 3: So we'll call it rabbit Hole Wednesday, if you will.
Speaker 3: I want to start with an email and play a
Speaker 3: couple audio clips for you, and on that third rabbit hole,
Speaker 3: we're going to go down just a little bit. And
Speaker 3: then i'd love for your guys feedback on these and
Speaker 3: would one of these particular rabbit holes be something you'd
Speaker 3: like me to do an entire episode on. But before
Speaker 3: we get started, let's go to the email box and uh,
Speaker 3: this is from Jack. I was thinking outside the box.
Speaker 3: And everyone seems to be fixated on Trump and Iran.
Speaker 3: But consider the Swift banking system that runs through Belgium
Speaker 3: and uses the American dollar. There are twenty million transactions
Speaker 3: per day through Swift, and the World Economic Forum does
Speaker 3: the same. A vast majority of these are done via
Speaker 3: JP Morgan and Chase Manhattan Bank. Remember March of twenty
Speaker 3: twenty one or twenty two, President Biden declared that in
Speaker 3: nine months he wanted a central bank digital currency to
Speaker 3: be online by Christmas. Now consider Bricks, which is Brazil, Russia, India,
Speaker 3: China and South Africa trying to use China's currency to
Speaker 3: displace the dollar and collapse the Western world. The deposition
Speaker 3: of Maduro and taking Venezuela's oil crippled Bricks because only
Speaker 3: Russia and Iran produce oil. Besides Venezuela, Russia is occupied,
Speaker 3: so the bankers like Jamie Diamond ordered the attack when
Speaker 3: I ran now, this is the Pineapple Wars, not about
Speaker 3: nuclear weapons. It's about the money. And if things get reset,
Speaker 3: then JP Morgan might lose power just thinking about things.
Speaker 2: And I agree with you, Jacques.
Speaker 3: I think anytime, whatever the news headline is, there's something
Speaker 3: deeper to what's going on. Sometimes it's a straight up distraction.
Speaker 3: Sometimes there is financial aspects to it as well. And
Speaker 3: to be frank, I don't think I've talked about the
Speaker 3: swift banking system in depth in quite some times. So
Speaker 3: that is something that we are going to revisit what's
Speaker 3: really going on. And again the BT system is the endgame,
Speaker 3: getting that central Bank digital coin, no more cash under
Speaker 3: the table, no more bartering in these type of things
Speaker 3: that they're trying to eliminate all of it so they
Speaker 3: can bring in the social credit score, the central Bank
Speaker 3: digital coin, and then the B system along with social
Speaker 3: credit scores.
Speaker 2: So thank you, Jacques.
Speaker 3: And again the email is thefact hunter at mail dot com.
Speaker 3: Rabbit hole number one, and this is an interesting one,
Speaker 3: the mothball rabbit hole.
Speaker 4: Okay, hold on a second, I just found a rabbit hole.
Speaker 4: I'd never thought I would have ever fathomed what happened
Speaker 4: to mothballs? Do you remember growing up here? And now
Speaker 4: I went to a college once we were opening up
Speaker 4: for the summer, and they have a million mothballs laying around.
Speaker 4: These mothballs deterred moths. So why are people not meeting
Speaker 4: mothballs anymore? The moths were eating their clothes because they
Speaker 4: were made of cotton, linen, wool, right, But now because
Speaker 4: everyone's wearing polyester, moth balls aren't as much of a
Speaker 4: thing anymore. So we went from wearing clothes that have
Speaker 4: a clothing has a frequency this is silk clothing has
Speaker 4: a frequency if you're wearing polyester all the time.
Speaker 2: Never mind the fact that.
Speaker 4: We know there's chemicals and forever chemicals and stuff, and
Speaker 4: we know that the static charge. Remember the dogs in
Speaker 4: pants study. Type in dogs in pant study, if you
Speaker 4: want to go down a crazy rabbit hole. They put
Speaker 4: frigging dogs in pants polyester and they noticed a shocking
Speaker 4: disruption to their.
Speaker 2: Ability to conceive.
Speaker 4: And the theory was and for the male dogs, it
Speaker 4: was their testosterone was going off a cliff because of
Speaker 4: they think is something to do with the static charge.
Speaker 4: You know, when you grab something out of the dryer
Speaker 4: you get shocked, that's usually polyester. I don't think I've
Speaker 4: had a static charge in years because all my clothes
Speaker 4: are natural materials now. But then there's also the study
Speaker 4: about how clothing wool, linen, and cotton have like the
Speaker 4: highest frequency, whereas polyester is like a zero frequency.
Speaker 2: Dude, it is not a vibe.
Speaker 4: And not to mention, if you watch that documentary about
Speaker 4: the clothing industry where they're called dark Dark Waters or something,
Speaker 4: and it's about how the modern fashion industry is the
Speaker 4: most like you think of the agricultural or you think
Speaker 4: of like oil usage and cars and transportation being bad
Speaker 4: for the environment, wait until you find out what this
Speaker 4: Sam damn fashion is doing.
Speaker 2: It's crazy.
Speaker 4: We got to return back to our natural materials, agreed.
Speaker 3: And we need to get back to Linen's you know,
Speaker 3: natural fiber clothing. And we talk all the time on
Speaker 3: this podcast about chemtrails and fluoride and everything else. They're
Speaker 3: trying to poison us with. Pardon me, but and we've
Speaker 3: mentioned it before, but we haven't really gone down that
Speaker 3: rabbit hole. Right, You don't think much about clothing beyond
Speaker 3: style and functionality and right getting you know, the cool
Speaker 3: little phrases on our t shirts to get people's attention.
Speaker 3: But there was a panel discussion recently, actually it was
Speaker 3: in London. It was closed that don't make us sick
Speaker 3: solutions to the problem of plastics, and you'd be interested
Speaker 3: to know that where's my notes. There's an alarming rate
Speaker 3: they say, self poisoning from the chemicals that are used
Speaker 3: to produce synthetic fabrics. That we what's our largest organ
Speaker 3: in our body, it's our skin and we absorb through
Speaker 3: the skin. Sixty nine percent of clothing that is now
Speaker 3: synthetic consuming it's like one hundred and ten billion pounds
Speaker 3: of oil annually. So again, if you do just a
Speaker 3: little bit of studies, the very first semisynthetic fabric was developed.
Speaker 3: It was Rayon and it was eighteen hundreds I think
Speaker 3: it was the eighteen thirties maybe, and it was produced
Speaker 3: from this wood pulp that is processed with chemicals to
Speaker 3: create it was like a silk like fabric, and in
Speaker 3: the to the twenties, nineteen twenties, it was advertised as
Speaker 3: an artificial silk, is how they labeled it. But like
Speaker 3: everything else we talk about resets, after World War Two,
Speaker 3: the use and the demand for relatively inexpensive synthetic fabrics
Speaker 3: dramatically increased, and you started seeing lycra nylon polyester is
Speaker 3: now dominating the clothing market. Like everything else, we have
Speaker 3: artificial foods, bioengineer foods, and our clothing is something that
Speaker 3: we don't pay enough attention to. So if that's something
Speaker 3: and not only that, this is something we have talked
Speaker 3: about a lot. When we launder our clothes, and many
Speaker 3: people not us. We use our own homemade laundry detergent, shampoo,
Speaker 3: we sometimes make our own soap. I have a certain
Speaker 3: brand that I use one hundred percent natural. Anything that
Speaker 3: touches your skin. We have to be very ctness enough.
Speaker 2: So there you go. Rabbit hole number one, rabbit hole
Speaker 2: number two.
Speaker 3: Let me click to the next screen.
Speaker 2: Here and I'll be frank with you.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure I was aware of this one, and
Speaker 3: once I looked into even Google, the Dallas Morning News
Speaker 3: wrote an article on this. This This is the Medicaid
Speaker 3: estate recovery rabbit hole.
Speaker 5: The government wants you to put your boomer parents that
Speaker 5: you don't like in a nursing home. That is their
Speaker 5: entire goal is for you to put your boomer parent
Speaker 5: in a nursing home, particularly if they own a home
Speaker 5: or any type of asset. Because Medicare you don't have
Speaker 5: to pay that back. That is what you get as
Speaker 5: health insurance when you turn sixty five in America, and
Speaker 5: it doesn't cover much. It covers your basic needs. So
Speaker 5: they push for you to sign up for Medicaid supplementary.
Speaker 5: And what they leave out a lot of the times
Speaker 5: is that when you have Medicaid supplementary, when you're elderly
Speaker 5: and you pass away, Medicaid seizes all of those assets
Speaker 5: to pay back whatever you spent in medicaid, which means
Speaker 5: that they're going to take houses, businesses, savings, pensions, whatever
Speaker 5: is left over. They now get that it is their
Speaker 5: way of ensuring that middle and lower class people do
Speaker 5: not acquire any type of generational wealth because those companies
Speaker 5: are going to come in and they're going to seize
Speaker 5: that house, that land, that business, whatever, and they're not
Speaker 5: going to sell it back to somebody like us. They're
Speaker 5: going to sell it to a corporation. That's who's going
Speaker 5: to come in and buy it. So for everybody that's like,
Speaker 5: I'm never taking care of my parents, I'm putting them
Speaker 5: in a home, YadA, YadA, YadA, that's fine if that's
Speaker 5: what you want to do, but you're going to lose
Speaker 5: everything that they own if you choose to do that.
Speaker 2: And there was a couple of errors there. Obviously.
Speaker 3: I think it actually starts in fifty five, not sixty five,
Speaker 3: if I'm not mistaken. And it's not even that you
Speaker 3: don't want to take care of them. There are people
Speaker 3: who just don't understand this. And you know, well, obviously
Speaker 3: many of us we go across social media looking for
Speaker 3: the next rabbit hole. And I saw that and I thought, nah,
Speaker 3: come on, and then I googled it and the first
Speaker 3: thing that came up was the Dallas Morning News MERP.
Speaker 3: The Medicaid Estate Recovery Program and its sole purpose, This
Speaker 3: is the Dallas Morning News again, its sole purpose is
Speaker 3: to seize money from the estates of deceased Medicaid recipients
Speaker 3: and then PLoP the recovered funds back into the state's coffers.
Speaker 3: And again what she said, it doesn't just go up
Speaker 3: for sale. Nine times out of ten. He goes to
Speaker 3: a corporation ran by Blackstreet, Blackrock or Vanguard, and the government,
Speaker 3: acting through a contractor called Health Management Systems Incorporated, does
Speaker 3: this by filing acclaim in probate and they the Health
Speaker 3: Management system is affiliated with Veritas Capital. Again they claim
Speaker 3: it in probate, and you know, you'll ask, why is
Speaker 3: this a prudent financial maneuver by the government, Because again,
Speaker 3: although Medicaid is a needs based program, not every Medicaid
Speaker 3: recipient is what they call a powper. So these type
Speaker 3: of assets that a recipient can own and still be
Speaker 3: Medicaid eligible is a homestead, a car, a retirement account.
Speaker 3: They can pull all of those, not just their home
Speaker 3: merp claims can involve a significant amount of money. So again,
Speaker 3: this is extremely interesting and I've only scratched the rabbit hole.
Speaker 3: If this is something that you're familiar with, encountered with,
Speaker 3: I'd be interested to hear from you.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: This is the rabbit hole of the day without it,
Speaker 3: this is the story of Georgia Tan.
Speaker 1: Apped and then sold an estimated five thousand babies between
Speaker 1: nineteen twenty four and nineteen fifty five thousand. This is
Speaker 1: certainly beyond shocking and unsettling to hear. But how she
Speaker 1: got away with it and how she got away with
Speaker 1: it for so long? Only as to the terrifying nature
Speaker 1: of this truly staggering story, which is actually hard to
Speaker 1: believe is one hundred percent true. Tan pulled off for
Speaker 1: a brazen scheme through operating the Tennessee Children's Home Society,
Speaker 1: a society which on the surface was doing the lord's
Speaker 1: work finding homes for orphaned children. In reality, it worked
Speaker 1: as a cover for Tans to funnel children into her care,
Speaker 1: only for her to turn around and sell them on
Speaker 1: the black market for extreme profit. In the nearly thirty
Speaker 1: years Tan and the society were in operation, she managed
Speaker 1: to kidnap and sell an estimated five thousand babies. These
Speaker 1: weren't orphaned children placed under her care. They were stolen
Speaker 1: right from under their parents' noses. How how could anyone
Speaker 1: get away with kidnapping and selling children for nearly thirty
Speaker 1: years right here in America? She did it with help
Speaker 1: from friends in high places. She took children who came
Speaker 1: from poor families for the simple reason that poor families
Speaker 1: at the time didn't have the necessary resources to search
Speaker 1: for one of their children should they go missing. If
Speaker 1: families did file a report, Georgia Tan would have it
Speaker 1: handled by her close friend E. H. Crump, a powerful
Speaker 1: tycoon in the so called Boss of Memphis. Crump would
Speaker 1: make sure the reports of missing children were ignored. She
Speaker 1: also had an elaborate system for taking newborn babies from
Speaker 1: hospitals and mental wards, bribing doctors and nurses to help
Speaker 1: her take the children and then tell their unsuspecting parents
Speaker 1: that their baby was stillborn. Tan would take off with
Speaker 1: the baby, with the child's parents believing their newborn to
Speaker 1: be deceased. She even had a system for snatching children
Speaker 1: right off the street. She took children from churches or
Speaker 1: daycare centers while they played with their friends, they'd end
Speaker 1: up in the arms of a uniform social worker under
Speaker 1: Tan's employ and they'd never be seen by their birth
Speaker 1: parents again. Once the children were under her care and
Speaker 1: their parents were numb, the wiser, Tan would wipe their
Speaker 1: identities and sell them to couples looking to adopt, leaving
Speaker 1: them completely in the dark about where the child came from.
Speaker 1: By falsifying or destroying their documents. Tan pocketed millions of
Speaker 1: dollars selling children to out of state couple, charging a
Speaker 1: five thousand dollars premium on out of state adoptions. Almost
Speaker 1: ninety percent of her sales, which in this context sales
Speaker 1: as a truly disgusting word, went to wealthy couples in
Speaker 1: New York and Los Angeles who could afford the steep
Speaker 1: pricing of TAN services, including actress Joan Crawford, who adopted
Speaker 1: her twin daughters from Tan. It should be noted none
Speaker 1: of the adoptive parents had any chance to suspect what
Speaker 1: they were doing was wrong. On its face, Tan's operation
Speaker 1: was a legitimate adoption agency. Of course, Simply adopting a
Speaker 1: baby and then never having questions about where that child
Speaker 1: came from isn't possible. But if the adoptive parents ever
Speaker 1: questioned Tan about issues that arose things like missing birth
Speaker 1: certificates or clearly falsified medical histories, Tan had an answer.
Speaker 1: If the new parents ever had any suspicion that anything
Speaker 1: fishy was going on, Tan would threaten them with legal
Speaker 1: action through one of her major accomplices, Family Court Judge
Speaker 1: Camille Kelly. Judge Kelly used her position of power to
Speaker 1: sanction Tan's activities and threaten the adoptive parents with taking
Speaker 1: away their adoptive children. If they continued to make a
Speaker 1: fuss or ask questions, they would also be threatened with
Speaker 1: being roped into whatever legal ramifications Tan may or may
Speaker 1: not have faced. I mean, they did use her services,
Speaker 1: so technically they were involved in an illegal enterprise themselves,
Speaker 1: and here was a judge telling them they were complicit.
Speaker 1: Needless to say, this blackmail coming from the US judicial
Speaker 1: system itself, made a lot of folks go quiet. Tan
Speaker 1: was so powerful and wealthy, so highly regarded as a
Speaker 1: steward of ridding adoption of its negative stigma at the time,
Speaker 1: and so well connected, no accusations or rumblings of misconduct
Speaker 1: ever stuck. The story is so insane that it's hard
Speaker 1: to even frame it or tell it in a way
Speaker 1: that makes any sense whatsoever. But it's completely real. It happened,
Speaker 1: and it affected thousands of lives right here in America.
Speaker 1: To make it even more insane and unbelievable, one of
Speaker 1: those children that Tan and her agency kidnapped and sold
Speaker 1: to unsuspecting adoptive parents was professional wrestling legend the nature Boy,
Speaker 1: Rick Flair, and in the end, Tan and Judge Kelly
Speaker 1: and E. H. Trump and everyone else who knew it
Speaker 1: was truly going on to the Tennessee Children's Home Society
Speaker 1: got away with it. None of them ever faced charges.
Speaker 1: Tan died of cancer at fifty nine. Judge Kelly and E. H.
Speaker 1: Crump both died shortly thereafter, in nineteen fifty four and
Speaker 1: nineteen fifty five, respectively. None of the children they kidnapped
Speaker 1: were ever returned to their biological parents. Thanks for watching.
Speaker 3: Now here's what's interesting, folks. There's actually a rabbit hole.
Speaker 3: Within that rabbit hole. You got the sanitized version of
Speaker 3: that story. Pardon me for a second. So Georgia ten again.
Speaker 3: She was born July eighteenth, eighteen ninety one, and died
Speaker 3: September fifteenth, nineteen fifty was an American child trafficker, and
Speaker 3: they operated under the Tennessee Children's Home Society and Unlicensed Adopts,
Speaker 3: an agency in Memphis, Tennessee, and again she used the
Speaker 3: home as a front for her black market adoption scheme.
Speaker 3: For thirty years, young children were kidnapped and then sold
Speaker 3: to wealthy families, abused or in some instances straight up murdered.
Speaker 2: And then a state.
Speaker 3: Investigation into numerous cases of numerous cases pardon me of
Speaker 3: adoption fraud led to the institution's closure in nineteen fifty.
Speaker 3: And of course we mentioned she died later that year,
Speaker 3: September fifteenth, nineteen fifty, and those involved died shortly thereafter
Speaker 3: as well, as you heard, and all of that is true.
Speaker 2: And if you go to the Wikipedia and.
Speaker 3: Read about it, you'll see that notable personalities who used
Speaker 3: hand services included actress Joan Crawford, one of the more
Speaker 3: famous actresses of our time, and she made a lot
Speaker 3: of money. Obviously, Rick Flair as well was one of
Speaker 3: the people who went through there. But what you don't hear,
Speaker 3: and this is the you know, we'll call it the
Speaker 3: rabbit hole. Within the rabbit hole is that she prominently
Speaker 3: is at the word. She readily promised Jewish babies to
Speaker 3: wealthy adoptive families and lucrative sales. Much of her clientele
Speaker 3: were Jewish again, black market scheme. And you have to understand,
Speaker 3: during the nineteen twenties into the forties, your traditional legitimate
Speaker 3: adoption agencies did not allow Jewish families to adopt. So
Speaker 3: she Tan, Georgia Tan saw this as a supply and
Speaker 3: demand problem. And most of those children's children, pardon me,
Speaker 3: went to Jewish families, and then she even falsified their heritage.
Speaker 3: She would aggressively market babies to wealthy Jewish families in
Speaker 3: the US, work New Jersey. She would use fake paperwork
Speaker 3: to pass off these kidnapped Think about this. She took
Speaker 3: kidnapped Southern Baptist babies and I'm saying this from Southern
Speaker 3: Baptist families and then sent them off to Jewish families.
Speaker 3: Do you understand, Yeah, unbelievable. So you had, you know,
Speaker 3: babies that came from a traditional Christian background, their families,
Speaker 3: they were stolen black market and most of them went
Speaker 3: to Jewish families and then were raised under Judaism. And
Speaker 3: that is the rabbit hole within the rabbit hole, and
Speaker 3: she used all kinds of methods to get her hands
Speaker 3: on children, pressure tactics, threats of legal action. She would
Speaker 3: dupe or coerce parents. But what she did was she
Speaker 3: normally used poor single mothers. She would turn the children
Speaker 3: over to her custody, most times under false pretenses, with
Speaker 3: fake PaperWorks, and then send them off to in most
Speaker 3: cases again these Jewish families. So there you go. That's
Speaker 3: your three rabbit holes for the day. But again, when
Speaker 3: you go to Wikipedia, that is the sanitized version. You
Speaker 3: don't have to look very hard to find the true version,
Speaker 3: that's for sure. I hope you enjoyed rabbit Hole Wednesday.
Speaker 2: If you have.
Speaker 3: Information on any of these three, or you want one
Speaker 3: of these to be a full blown episode, please email
Speaker 3: us thefact Hunter at mail dot com. The links are
Speaker 3: in the show notes. And as always, God bless you,
Speaker 3: keep your head on a swivel, in Christ in your heart,
Speaker 3: and until we meet again, my friends, we will see you.
Speaker 6: We followed all the fucking dreams, we questioned, rely, we
Speaker 6: pulled away the curl they were counting on too high.
Speaker 6: But underneath the headlines, beyond what we can see, the
Speaker 6: war is not with flesh, blood.
Speaker 2: The principality.
Speaker 7: He's down the ago where time scros, every scheme serves power.
Speaker 7: Un scene to see this low line control, its s battle,
Speaker 7: soul called the truth and godody t, windows, work space, stay,
Speaker 7: Sis s SI. It's all so gal down. It's just
Speaker 7: a spirit extos. The love stands.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the Fact Hunter Radio Network, Just the facts.
Speaker 5: Ma'm