Speaker 1: Let this be a reminder to you all that this
Speaker 1: organization will not tolerate failure.
Speaker 2: The side of the Federal building has been blown off, yessing.
Speaker 3: They believe they were part of a CIA project called
Speaker 3: mk Ultra.
Speaker 4: Just like a segment of society, there is not living
Speaker 4: in reality.
Speaker 3: In a certain sense.
Speaker 5: We're kind of a little bit more Israel's vasal state.
Speaker 3: There are police chiefs facilitating prostitution networks.
Speaker 5: Oh what's up, gay? Sorry I got I got a
Speaker 5: little carried away in the music I was. I was
Speaker 5: enjoying it.
Speaker 3: It's good morning.
Speaker 5: It's a beautiful Sunday morning.
Speaker 3: Sorry, we're a.
Speaker 5: Little bit late today. It is what it is. I
Speaker 5: don't know what it is. Past couple of days, I
Speaker 5: have been struggling to wake up to my alarm. But
Speaker 5: it's because it's been the weekend, and it's kind of
Speaker 5: like alarm goes off and you're like cuck and I
Speaker 5: don't get a ship. It's a weekend. Like there's like
Speaker 5: a subconscious part of you that says that. But yeah,
Speaker 5: no any idea to break my mind of that wage
Speaker 5: slave behavior because it's not where we're at it. Hopefully
Speaker 5: within the year. Well, I mean it will be to
Speaker 5: me might be within the year doing this on the rag.
Speaker 3: So you know, we're killing it over here.
Speaker 5: Things I think are going well looking up, I'm I'm,
Speaker 5: I'm excited for this. Where this year goes. It is
Speaker 5: the year of the Schizo for sure. The stories are
Speaker 5: abound and are hard to keep up with and hard
Speaker 5: to catalog so works out we've gone to this almost
Speaker 5: daily format.
Speaker 3: So what's up? Awesome man, Glad to be here with you, Bud. Yeah, absolutely,
Speaker 3: my friend, just I.
Speaker 5: Didn't even say this is Morning Dump. By the way,
Speaker 5: today is the joint project of Morning Dump, so it's
Speaker 5: going out to all of our platforms, so it's going
Speaker 5: out to the Underclass podcast and to No Way Hosea podcast.
Speaker 5: So that's that is the delio today, it felt, folks.
Speaker 5: But yeah, sorry, I didn't even do the normal intro.
Speaker 5: I got sucked into the music.
Speaker 3: Did I know? I almost did that last time the
Speaker 3: first time I used to edit. But yeah, man, I
Speaker 3: don't know. It's just spook season, right, paired with psyop season,
Speaker 3: so we're surrounded by spooks, it feels like, and everywhere
Speaker 3: we turn is another psychological operation waiting in the wings,
Speaker 3: and kind of like you know, providing to that demoralization
Speaker 3: process in more ways than one. But I think that's
Speaker 3: also you know, I would say it kind of that
Speaker 3: hinges on the perception management of you personally as an individual.
Speaker 3: So like it's always something that I try and remind
Speaker 3: myself that, like, don't fall into the traps. You know,
Speaker 3: it's they're designed to demoralize us, right, Like, there's so
Speaker 3: much more positive ways to to, you know, perceive a
Speaker 3: lot of these these narratives. I think that really I
Speaker 3: find a lot more hope and just like attempting to
Speaker 3: you know, isolate what seems far more plausible within the
Speaker 3: context of the details that have come to light our
Speaker 3: surface to regarding certain you know, breaking news agendaos. Yeah,
Speaker 3: like UFO exactly. Yeah, they're so hot right now. It's like,
Speaker 3: it's so crazy how much the Indiana Jones meme is
Speaker 3: accurate on a daily basis within the news cycle. You know,
Speaker 3: it's a it's never ending, but I feel like there's
Speaker 3: always some sort of layered there's always layers to the operations, right,
Speaker 3: So like that's something that that I've I've noticed and
Speaker 3: catches my eye instantly with these things and the fact
Speaker 3: that there was a direct connection to Stephen Greer, doctor
Speaker 3: Stephen Greer with fucking Matthew Libelsberger right the Vegas.
Speaker 5: Yes, yes, there was some sort of connect. What was
Speaker 5: the connection? Do you recall off the band or was
Speaker 5: it just communication? Okay, they were in communication, yeah, And
Speaker 5: it's like I don't even know if he was in
Speaker 5: communication with livelis Burger because remember the they're the key
Speaker 5: point of the libels Burger thing is the whole safety
Speaker 5: number with a signal, So you're like in the safety
Speaker 5: number change when he came back from Germany, and then
Speaker 5: it also changed at the time, like what was after
Speaker 5: his death? So it's like we who were people talking
Speaker 5: to and that before because a lot of people only
Speaker 5: only make note of that one after his death because
Speaker 5: obviously like whoa after his and to be fair, the
Speaker 5: one while he was alive is obviously more explainable. I
Speaker 5: don't I don't know the ins and outs of signals,
Speaker 5: so it's like I guess something happened there, but it
Speaker 5: happened after he died, and so it's like there's Shenanigan's there.
Speaker 5: So it's like when it when it also cast out
Speaker 5: upon the previous Uh, any other previous tech shenanigans, so
Speaker 5: because yes, I guess the one before he was you know,
Speaker 5: he was theoretically in possession of all of his data
Speaker 5: and you know, you know devices at that time.
Speaker 3: But uh, we don't.
Speaker 5: I don't know. I have no fucking idea, you know
Speaker 5: what I mean. It's like, how deep does his zop goes?
Speaker 5: This is this is this still is still one that's
Speaker 5: like this is a distraction off. They really did a
Speaker 5: good job, because it's like it's like, it's what the
Speaker 5: fuck is going on here?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 5: Sorry, I'm rambling with the livelis Burger thing, but yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, no,
Speaker 5: the uh it is I guess that kind of the
Speaker 5: point I'm just trying to make is we don't even
Speaker 5: know if he actually was talking to livels Burger or
Speaker 5: someone pretending to be livelis Burger, which I guess kind
Speaker 5: of plays more into the spook accusations when it comes
Speaker 5: to Greer because it's on but it's also talking himself,
Speaker 5: but it's also compartmentalized. Though even then there's a good
Speaker 5: chance he probably like it. Probably he probably wouldn't know.
Speaker 5: He would probably just assume he's talking to some other
Speaker 5: levels Burger guy.
Speaker 3: You know, so sure, it's just hilarious to me that
Speaker 3: you know, stayed sort of paving the way for this
Speaker 3: new disclosure. Is another strange synchronicity tying in Stephen fucking
Speaker 3: Grier to to another what seems to be sort of
Speaker 3: you know, domestic gladio operation in many ways, right. And
Speaker 3: so here we are with more government military whistle blowers
Speaker 3: led by you know, Air Force veterans working out of
Speaker 3: intelligence black sites, convincing us that we need to believe
Speaker 3: in aliens again. So I guess we should take them
Speaker 3: at face value and not even question these narratives, right, Yeah,
Speaker 3: which is.
Speaker 5: A man Sea suck is just just gassing me up today,
Speaker 5: saying excellent.
Speaker 3: Mug me.
Speaker 5: Do you have a mug too? What's your mug?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 5: No, mugs must.
Speaker 3: Actually I do I have my? There go maybe maybe.
Speaker 5: Maybe some of years, So you have yours? Is pretty cool.
Speaker 5: There's just some merch mine is like literally from this
Speaker 5: is this is from my wife's grandpa who was over
Speaker 5: and I believe World War two and he got this
Speaker 5: when he was in England. So it was just some
Speaker 5: like sign. Yeah, it's just old ship, so both both
Speaker 5: the ship. Yeah, he's telling me I have great hair,
Speaker 5: thank you.
Speaker 3: Really.
Speaker 5: I wet my hair and combed it a little bit
Speaker 5: before because it was being unruly. I had bed hair,
Speaker 5: and I like didn't like completely redoing my hair altogether,
Speaker 5: so I just wet it and this kind of brushed
Speaker 5: it real quick dry, looking ridiculous, but right now it
Speaker 5: looks cool.
Speaker 3: I was supposed to get a haircut on Friday, but yeah,
Speaker 3: didn't end up happening. But anyway, Yeah, but.
Speaker 5: I mean, just to catch the audience up a little bit,
Speaker 5: because I don't know if we've been explicit enough about it,
Speaker 5: but we have. Apparently there were some sort of disclosure.
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't know if you know specifics of it.
Speaker 5: The extent to what I know of it is I
Speaker 5: saw some sort of tweet, which actually all share right now,
Speaker 5: and uh, I saved it then, and I saw other
Speaker 5: people kind of chattering in the reply. It is kind
Speaker 5: of about some sort of other thing coming up here.
Speaker 5: You have this sort of revelation of some sort and
Speaker 5: so then I guess this is this is what I'm so,
Speaker 5: I guess this is him talking about it. But this
Speaker 5: is kind of the extent that I know. I don't
Speaker 5: know if there was some sort of congressional something or other,
Speaker 5: or if it was just a it was just a
Speaker 5: drop and nothing nothing like official past that. I don't know.
Speaker 5: I guess we can play this video real quick, maybe
Speaker 5: answer a little give us a little bit of context.
Speaker 5: But I just also find it kind of funny because
Speaker 5: I mean to be fake, just just a little bit
Speaker 5: of a little behind the curtains of the audience. I
Speaker 5: know where this goes. I know what they're gonna what,
Speaker 5: what you're gonna see next. I'm just I did. I
Speaker 5: found it funny to save this and then the reveal
Speaker 5: later because it's a little bit of a don't I
Speaker 5: don't want to spoil it for you guys, but let
Speaker 5: let's play this. I think the the pairing these two
Speaker 5: together make it a little bit comical. Let let's play this.
Speaker 7: I think when the American people see some of the
Speaker 7: evidence that this individual has, you're gonna leave some people
Speaker 7: scratching their heads. And that's okay because I think now
Speaker 7: we're getting to the point in the conversation of disclosure
Speaker 7: where people are realizing that, yeah, this is real.
Speaker 5: It's what even says here real quick, is I guess
Speaker 5: somebody named Jake Barber was presenting on Saturday on News Nations,
Speaker 5: so that happened. Yeah, so I guess this happened before
Speaker 5: the This is stuff going up before the exclusive, and
Speaker 5: so we will show the exclusive an eventuent, But let's
Speaker 5: keep going.
Speaker 7: It has occurred and it's continuing to occur, and our
Speaker 7: government hasn't always been completely truthful about it. I am
Speaker 7: absolutely certain there's probably really good reasons for it. I
Speaker 7: don't agree with those reasons, but with that said, I
Speaker 7: must respect those reasons. And that's why it's taken us
Speaker 7: so long, over seven years, to get to this point
Speaker 7: in the conversation, because we had to do it right,
Speaker 7: and there was only one chance to do it right
Speaker 7: and a whole bunch of chances to do it wrong. Ultimately,
Speaker 7: I don't know how this is going to play out.
Speaker 7: My hope is that members of Congress will see this.
Speaker 7: My hope is that individuals in the new Trump administration
Speaker 7: will see this and begin to start asking the hard
Speaker 7: questions and do some of the things that we have
Speaker 7: made recommendations in the past to do, things like new legislation,
Speaker 7: things like a national strategy for US air domain to
Speaker 7: include anomalous phenomenon to include things like drones.
Speaker 5: All right, so this is the preamble before the revelation,
Speaker 5: which we will show you in a minute. Any thoughts,
Speaker 5: aust At this point it sounded there I was, I
Speaker 5: was a little I was kind of producing, so I
Speaker 5: missed some details, but it sounds like he was calling
Speaker 5: for more Daddy, give governor give kmore government.
Speaker 3: Eddie, Please please let me tell the public what they
Speaker 3: deserve to know. And in reality, it's just like clearly
Speaker 3: some sort of smoking mirrors, you know, and what I
Speaker 3: believe to be, you know, the modern fulfillment of this
Speaker 3: this kind of New Age philosophy, the New Age religion,
Speaker 3: the New Age concept of God. And I think it's
Speaker 3: like the replacement of the God whole. You know that
Speaker 3: so many people struggle to even like, you know, kind
Speaker 3: of acknowledge is at the very least a psychological condition,
Speaker 3: at the very least that people are consistently, you know,
Speaker 3: attempting to replace the idea of God with these various
Speaker 3: you know, replacement theories. And so when you have like
Speaker 3: these New Age esoteric ideological systems of control that have
Speaker 3: been manufactured by these intelligence apparatuses and things of that nature,
Speaker 3: then yeah, it just feels like this is manufactured disclosure,
Speaker 3: and especially when you trace the threads right, That's what's
Speaker 3: convinced me, because, believe me, brother, I came into all
Speaker 3: of this like a fool, except thing the Bobblazar narratives
Speaker 3: and things of that nature, thinking that, oh my god,
Speaker 3: they have these propulsion systems that are you know that
Speaker 3: they've had to reverse engineer and write like it. I
Speaker 3: bought the whole you know, U a p extraterrestrial threat
Speaker 3: and until I really began to expose myself to various
Speaker 3: operational tactics and and and things of that nature, which
Speaker 3: which really introduced me to the Blue Beam narrative. But again,
Speaker 3: people really, I think unfortunately tend to dismiss the Project
Speaker 3: Blue Beam very much because of the surgeon nass to
Speaker 3: direct right interpretation of of let's say, you might not
Speaker 3: if you read through Project Blue Beam, you might not.
Speaker 3: As much as it does feel as if it's very
Speaker 3: very predicting the future, and in very many dystopian ways,
Speaker 3: there's still like this larger than life kind of unbelievable
Speaker 3: aspect to it that makes it difficult to embrace. And
Speaker 3: then also he has it seems as if there's there's
Speaker 3: a lot of clouds of doubts surrounding Surge monast in general,
Speaker 3: and and his death even But but still he makes
Speaker 3: it very known his his kind of religious philosophy and
Speaker 3: his approach to Bluebeam, which makes it a little more
Speaker 3: difficult for all different people on the political spectrum to
Speaker 3: kind of embrace that idea. But but what I think
Speaker 3: is important is that really, once reading through with an
Speaker 3: objective mind, uh, it's just it's undeniable that he had
Speaker 3: either he's a phenomenal science fiction fiction writer, right, or
Speaker 3: he had just uh, he had some sort of window
Speaker 3: into you know, the machinations of the intelligence apparatus at
Speaker 3: the time. And because it does it this is before
Speaker 3: the Voice of God technology was exposed to the public.
Speaker 3: This is before you know, we were aware of the
Speaker 3: fact that they could you know, beyond directed energy weapons.
Speaker 3: That was sort of it was much more about the uh,
Speaker 3: you know, the sky show, right, the elaborate sky show
Speaker 3: and being able to create these you know, three dimensional
Speaker 3: images that would overall convince the vast majority of the
Speaker 3: global public to embrace some kind of you know, actual
Speaker 3: outside extraterrestrial you know, threat of invasion, right, like some
Speaker 3: sort of uh, you know as the War of the
Speaker 3: World style right where it's where it's been sort of
Speaker 3: conditioned into the minds of the subconscious minds of of
Speaker 3: the the mass public. And and so there's almost this expectation,
Speaker 3: you know, of an alien invasion to take place at
Speaker 3: some point in the future, especially if you've.
Speaker 5: It almost seems like though I mean, maybe correct me.
Speaker 5: I mean it's it's it's a bit's both, but it
Speaker 5: feels like we're being programmed now. Everyone just sees something go,
Speaker 5: it's a drone, Like we don't know what it is.
Speaker 5: It's just a knee jerk drone. So it seems like
Speaker 5: we're almost they're almost trading in the UFO superstition.
Speaker 3: For a more new age.
Speaker 5: Technocratic superstition to where we're always worried about some other
Speaker 5: AI or or drone or some sort of technology around
Speaker 5: the corner that's coming to get us type deal. Oh yeah, yeah,
Speaker 5: almost like a butlerry and jehaw Dune type shit, you
Speaker 5: know what I mean. Like we're like, that's like they're
Speaker 5: almost ginning up fear. I mean, obviously, then it becomes
Speaker 5: this like perpetuating thing of like but we have to
Speaker 5: have all these scary things, so we're the ones that you.
Speaker 3: Know what I mean.
Speaker 5: So it's now they're seating this narrative that like, and
Speaker 5: it's this old boomer bullshit that you know, this is
Speaker 5: libertarianism one oh one where it's like, you know, people
Speaker 5: will be like, you know, oh, well, China is gonna
Speaker 5: take over America if X, Y and Z or whatever.
Speaker 5: You're like, like, I don't know, you play this too logistically.
Speaker 5: It's fucking retarded. But you you add in this component
Speaker 5: into the normy out there. I mean that's already easily
Speaker 5: buying into the like, oh, if we don't have Daddy Gubman,
Speaker 5: then like China is gonna take over or something like.
Speaker 5: Now you add in that now they have super secret
Speaker 5: spy drones. You're like, oh fuck, like these guys they're
Speaker 5: trying to take over. Like it feeds into that old
Speaker 5: boomer slot bullshit that we've been fed forever that like
Speaker 5: X X scary country is doing X is doing Y
Speaker 5: scary thing, so they can do Z awful thing to us.
Speaker 3: So it's mean, it's a playbook.
Speaker 5: As old as time, but it just seems to be
Speaker 5: that's it seems to be maybe scale a little more
Speaker 5: technological now with a newer age, they're they're reprogrammed. They're
Speaker 5: taking old narratives and repurposing them for for the modern
Speaker 5: day essentially. So, and the great thing about UFOs is
Speaker 5: you can kind of play both ways because you still
Speaker 5: have people that buy both. They go, well, well, it
Speaker 5: must be fucking you know. There's people who could be
Speaker 5: the kind of buy either, like, well it's probably China,
Speaker 5: but it could be Aliens.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: It's exactly what I was about to say, is that
Speaker 3: what I was gonna say is that it's effectively this
Speaker 3: choose your own reality simulation that we you know, they've
Speaker 3: inevitably manufactured this kind of here's the narrative that fits
Speaker 3: your ideology right, and and it will help in in
Speaker 3: every way it will distract, you know, as far as
Speaker 3: where you fall ideologically on the political spectrum, the narrative
Speaker 3: is there waiting for you, and it's typically the most
Speaker 3: you know, promoted and also the usually the most attractive
Speaker 3: if you're i would say, less plugged into you know,
Speaker 3: alternative theories and things of that nage critical thinking really
Speaker 3: but but yeah, it just it does seem as if
Speaker 3: wherever you land on the political spectrum. Ideologically, there is
Speaker 3: a false narrative that's been manufactured for you to embrace.
Speaker 3: And so that's why when it comes to, you know,
Speaker 3: the entire the drone idea is that, of course they
Speaker 3: want to kind of create this dynamic of a potential
Speaker 3: international threat that's posed, and then they can of course
Speaker 3: just ratchet up any sort of tension with an escalation process.
Speaker 3: But but yeah, beyond that, I just think that it's
Speaker 3: a lot easier to kind of, you know, put it
Speaker 3: in those terms for those exact individuals that you mentioned,
Speaker 3: the boomer style ideology. Of course, that would be easier
Speaker 3: for them to embrace than let's say.
Speaker 5: I've scared those motherfuckers are right now, hundred percent. Imagine
Speaker 5: how scared boomers are right now if they buying everything
Speaker 5: they're hearing from the news. I mean, whatever stereotypical Fox
Speaker 5: News guy that buys everything that they fucking tell him,
Speaker 5: that dude's.
Speaker 3: Scared of fuck right now, terrified.
Speaker 5: I hope they. I hope they're really not that stereotyped.
Speaker 5: I don't know too many people like that, right Jesus
Speaker 5: christ Man, check on your local Fox News boomer slap
Speaker 5: Boomer boy slop conservative. Please, they're struggling. Okay, they may
Speaker 5: need help, because if you're buying all this bullshit, I
Speaker 5: got I got something to sell you. But yeah, here
Speaker 5: is here is this drop. This is from news Nation,
Speaker 5: the one I was telling you about the dropped yesterday.
Speaker 5: This is from my buddy Clinton. So this is a
Speaker 5: world changing UFO footage we were promised. I haven't looked
Speaker 5: through this yet, so I mean, it looks weak here,
Speaker 5: but let's go and play it.
Speaker 8: Let's slow this down to take a closer look. That's
Speaker 8: an egg shaped UAP suspended from a one hundred and
Speaker 8: fifty foot long line. We're told the craft is about
Speaker 8: twenty feet long, the egg suspended in a cradle. And
Speaker 8: look how careful the pilot is as they bring their
Speaker 8: precious cargo into land. Let's freeze frame here to look
Speaker 8: at one of the clearest images of a UAP quarter taken.
Speaker 8: This is no blurry light in a distant sky, the
Speaker 8: source of the footage putting themselves at incredible risk to
Speaker 8: record this UAP retrieval. Look at how perfectly smooth the
Speaker 8: craft is, no markings at all, and no visible means
Speaker 8: of propulsion or way to see inside. Watch how It
Speaker 8: rolls almost graceful as it hits the ground, despite being
Speaker 8: wrapped in the ropes and canvas from the cradle as
Speaker 8: it's dropped for pickup the UAP final destination still unknown.
Speaker 5: It is just insulting. Yeah, come on, man, this is
Speaker 5: some fucking glowy having fun with a fucking with a
Speaker 5: with a filter on his fucking camera and the fucking stick,
Speaker 5: twine cloth and an egg.
Speaker 3: That's what it looks like. I mean a holy ship. Yeah,
Speaker 3: there was I even, man, I read something. Yeah, here
Speaker 3: it was. You know who Nick Hinton is. I think
Speaker 3: he's uh, he's done some legit journalism in the past.
Speaker 3: I'm not quite certain, but either way, he's He's been
Speaker 3: a decent follow for a while. But he had posted
Speaker 3: something that I thought was perfect in regard to this footage,
Speaker 3: specifically because the Air Force veteran right claims he sees
Speaker 3: this alien non human egg shaped aircraft while working for
Speaker 3: the secret UFO retrieval program, but apparently Aleister Crowley when
Speaker 3: he contacted that entity LAMB in nineteen eighteen, he drew
Speaker 3: a portrait of it which resembled the gray alien, right
Speaker 3: before the Grays werever even a concept in the public consciousness,
Speaker 3: and he going.
Speaker 5: Around online to supposed I don't know if it's bullshit
Speaker 5: or where it's came from. I couldn't find the sources
Speaker 5: of it. There's some photo going around that people are
Speaker 5: saying as a real alien.
Speaker 3: Have you seen that? Oh yeah, dude, I have the picture.
Speaker 3: I'll pull it up here.
Speaker 5: Hey, did you find any sort of any or is
Speaker 5: that just one of those ones like deep seated doors
Speaker 5: just kind of out there and it's kind.
Speaker 3: Of a some sort of Yeah, no, I'm pretty sure
Speaker 3: that I remember.
Speaker 5: I mean, I think it's bullshit, but you know what
Speaker 5: I mean so far as like its origin, like, oh.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no, I remember reading about it.
Speaker 5: Like at least this is like somebody somewhere gave it
Speaker 5: to some news agency, whereas the other one just like
Speaker 5: showed up on the internet and people are running with it.
Speaker 5: I mean, this is bullshit too.
Speaker 3: But sure. But what's interesting is that the alleged entity
Speaker 3: that was you know, contacted by Crowley in nineteen eighteen,
Speaker 3: that resembled this gray alien, right.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it looked just like that that that when I
Speaker 5: was talking about That's kind of why it brought it up.
Speaker 5: It kind of looked like a new age version of
Speaker 5: like if you were making a you know, a movie
Speaker 5: in twenty twenty six where the aliens were like, I
Speaker 5: don't know, whatever, the the stereotypical gray aliens were in it,
Speaker 5: they would probably look like that. Like that, it was
Speaker 5: like that newer look, like the cooler, edgier I don't know,
Speaker 5: Christopher Noles not Noles, I don't know, you know what
Speaker 5: I mean? Like that new new, that new feel like
Speaker 5: the difference between old Godzilla and new Godzilla.
Speaker 3: You know what I mean? Yeah, exactly, it really is.
Speaker 3: But it's strange as hell that considering the what that looked.
Speaker 3: That looks like a fucking egg with some duct tape
Speaker 3: on it or something like it really does. And then
Speaker 3: the entity I just like planets in the background reb
Speaker 3: because it's so retarded. For real, the city allegedly tells
Speaker 3: Crowley that it's all in the egg, which weird just
Speaker 3: as far as the synchronicity is concerned, not really anything else,
Speaker 3: but it's at least worth mentioning, right, But this is
Speaker 3: how I was introduced to this ridiculous new disclosure. It
Speaker 3: was by this very popular account on Twitter that is
Speaker 3: behind attempting to promote the disclosure right and really wants
Speaker 3: us to buy in to Stephen Greer's narratives as well.
Speaker 3: But look at this, and then I want to show
Speaker 3: you one other thing. But yeah, so this dude, doctor
Speaker 3: Stephen Greer just doubled down UFO UAP disclosure allegedly starts tomorrow.
Speaker 3: New whistleblower Jake Barber has personally recovered crashed US seventeen.
Speaker 5: So this was they were implying the drop that we
Speaker 5: were just playing.
Speaker 3: Absolutely So for all the people who say this is
Speaker 3: a con theory, you're about to have the wake up
Speaker 3: of your life up dogs.
Speaker 5: So funny, I seen, I've seen the egg dog. There's
Speaker 5: no there's no going back.
Speaker 3: Oh man. So here we have new whistleblowers led by
Speaker 3: Air Force who have worked at black sites out west
Speaker 3: and sensitive operations are coming forward to take the step
Speaker 3: let's see, uh and some of.
Speaker 5: These are new stuff. Go ahead and play that, play
Speaker 5: that video.
Speaker 3: Yeah that was yeah, spoken dude, Jesus Christ. Yeah, were
Speaker 3: you excited to talk about Stephen Greer?
Speaker 5: You guys talk to him?
Speaker 3: No, no, no, no, no, I'm excited to talk about
Speaker 3: him because I just think, like.
Speaker 5: You an interview maybe that would be down on the
Speaker 5: shooting on him up the corner in public.
Speaker 1: I've spoken for some time about a group of people
Speaker 1: who have worked at black sites out west and sensitive
Speaker 1: operations where I have visited those sites. The leader of
Speaker 1: that team has has come forward. He has had a
Speaker 1: little cameo on News Nation yesterday. Uh that would be
Speaker 1: a Wednesday that was talking about his involvement with crash
Speaker 1: retrieval operations and what have you. There will be more
Speaker 1: that will be coming out Saturday on that same show
Speaker 1: with Ross.
Speaker 6: So tell me about the moment when you realized retrieval
Speaker 6: of non human technology alien take so it became communication
Speaker 6: process of procedure.
Speaker 5: For the audio listeners. This guy is deeply just.
Speaker 9: Incerting to look looking at the object on the ground,
Speaker 9: you could tell that it was extraordinary and as it was,
Speaker 9: it was not human.
Speaker 1: Is that this has evolved a lot in the last
Speaker 1: two months.
Speaker 5: So that's the guy who gave us this ship. As
Speaker 5: what they're saying, I'm sorry I talked over it a
Speaker 5: little bit, but that's the guy, not Career, but the
Speaker 5: other dude, the the fucking fucking eyes out of his head,
Speaker 5: fucking psycho. That that's the dude who's who's supposedly the
Speaker 5: crash retrieval guy. That's no, that is totally not fucking
Speaker 5: wigged out a methamphetamine ultra victims are.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Jake Barber, I think that's his name.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you can fucking you can fucking get the.
Speaker 3: Fuck out of that absolutely.
Speaker 5: I mean, how many of these videos are there? I
Speaker 5: mean I don't. Okay, there's like a clip for each
Speaker 5: one of them.
Speaker 3: Okay, whatever.
Speaker 5: At least we got to see the one guy, the
Speaker 5: one fucking psycho. It's supposedly where we got this infant.
Speaker 5: So that guy, the guy eyes bugging out of his head,
Speaker 5: just to recap for people out there, that is the
Speaker 5: guy that is the one who dropped the who is
Speaker 5: a crash reprieval guy supposedly where we're getting this this
Speaker 5: video from the guy who looks meth of his fucking mind?
Speaker 5: So which or amphetaminea of his mine?
Speaker 3: Whatever? Fuck?
Speaker 5: I mean, I'm not. I guess I can't can't claim
Speaker 5: for sure it's myth, but it's infetamine that looks like.
Speaker 3: No doubt, no doubt. Oh yeah, and then this is
Speaker 3: the other video I wanted to show you because recently,
Speaker 3: Yeah I did, I did, but it's like really like
Speaker 3: blew me away, honestly, because it just perfectly elaborates on
Speaker 3: exactly what I personally feel to be the case, which
Speaker 3: also kind of scares me because anytime a CIA whistleblower
Speaker 3: is like confirming some sort of bias I have, I
Speaker 3: become uh, you know, I kind of like it.
Speaker 5: Puts you in a tailspin though, because you're like, oh shit,
Speaker 5: it's real, and then you're like, wait, is that just
Speaker 5: what they want me to know exactly?
Speaker 9: Do it?
Speaker 3: Really? You have to think that way though, otherwise you're
Speaker 3: just you know, you kind I mean, if anything, you
Speaker 3: add of castid a doubt as soon as you're the
Speaker 3: one who gives me the information, Like fuck, I know
Speaker 3: I've been asking you for you give me this information,
Speaker 3: but now you.
Speaker 5: Gave me this information, I'm very skeptical.
Speaker 3: But it's so interesting because it fits perfectly in the
Speaker 3: concept of of modern bluebeam, right, and how they would
Speaker 3: have you know, evolved these practices over time while utilizing
Speaker 3: this kind of like because you have to consider like,
Speaker 3: not only you know, do you have all these low
Speaker 3: worth orbit satellites right that are constantly that providing this
Speaker 3: this vast infrastructure that that you know, is hidden to
Speaker 3: the vast majority as far as unacknowledged, you know, for
Speaker 3: the most part. And and that goes as far as
Speaker 3: you know, we have actual documentation that proves that even
Speaker 3: local police forces and domestically in the US have the
Speaker 3: ability to tap into these uh you know, these technological
Speaker 3: system thumbs and and have a digital map overlooking your
Speaker 3: home where they can see in your home, see you naked,
Speaker 3: see everything that you're doing, see you know, and they
Speaker 3: don't even need a warrant for this, which is just
Speaker 3: warrantless surveillance.
Speaker 5: The creepy thing about this whole stuff moving forward is
Speaker 5: the U I just it made me. It really dawned
Speaker 5: on me the other day. It was probably like a
Speaker 5: week or two ago. I was driving to work, and
Speaker 5: I and as I was, I was on this like overpass.
Speaker 5: The part of like that was driving, so like there's
Speaker 5: like you know, like if I look down, there's like
Speaker 5: I can see streets below me. So I'm probably like
Speaker 5: technically like twenty twenty five feet up in the air
Speaker 5: above other the street and in a different like overpass
Speaker 5: on some sort of highway or whatever, and then I
Speaker 5: just see floating level you know, maybe like ten feet
Speaker 5: above me, off the side kind of above the street,
Speaker 5: so like you know, not like technically above the overpass,
Speaker 5: but off the side so where it could kind of
Speaker 5: see both just a fucking little something about yeah big,
Speaker 5: just just just hovering just there. And it was like
Speaker 5: obviously like a drone. So and I was like, and
Speaker 5: I could see the lights like the you know, the
Speaker 5: the signal, the direction lights and stuff like that. I'm like,
Speaker 5: oh shit. And then I was like it just was there,
Speaker 5: just floating there. I mean, it wasn't in a spot
Speaker 5: where like someone would be doing recreational stuff. And it
Speaker 5: was just because it was like literally like in a
Speaker 5: very like in a toll type highway type multiple kind
Speaker 5: of like highway as streets they're kind of run through there,
Speaker 5: so very not really like a you know, recreational like
Speaker 5: houses type area. And so I was like, what the fuck?
Speaker 5: You know, was just the more I thought about, the
Speaker 5: more I'm like, I wonder if they're using these for
Speaker 5: traffic or hell even I mean they could have been
Speaker 5: a news thing to where they're just using it to
Speaker 5: keep an eye on traffic for news, I mean, but
Speaker 5: like in too extrapolate from there and to look at
Speaker 5: a little bit more sinister, just kind of like what
Speaker 5: is the are they are we getting more accustomed to
Speaker 5: seeing these as well to where like now in the
Speaker 5: future we will just see drones floating around all the
Speaker 5: place and just just kind of accept the fact that
Speaker 5: we have a you know, ever present floating police monitoring
Speaker 5: our skies essentially like I don't know, creepy. Oh yeah,
Speaker 5: I guess it's kind of like we knew it was coming,
Speaker 5: but still fucking tired, you know.
Speaker 3: I know, even in areas in the UK, it's like
Speaker 3: they've already you know, domestically embraced the the you know,
Speaker 3: the drone systems. As far as in the private sector,
Speaker 3: you're you're seeing like door Dash in the UK, like
Speaker 3: fire a lot of employees and just use drones to
Speaker 3: like carry people's groceries and stuff, which has been causing
Speaker 3: a lot of different problems. And I think they even
Speaker 3: had to like withdraw that that whole program in in
Speaker 3: some areas because of how difficult it was for them.
Speaker 3: They were like crashing and shit, and like you know
Speaker 3: what I mean, like uh, and that that's just like
Speaker 3: such a that in itself feels dystopian, really right to
Speaker 3: have like this weird air traffic overhead that's entirely uh
Speaker 3: just mechanically robotically controlled. Uh. That in itself feels very
Speaker 3: strange and I'm you know, unwilling to kind of accept that.
Speaker 5: But which is kind of kind of partially my point.
Speaker 5: I think the one big thing we can pull out
Speaker 5: of this this art I mean, which we didn't play that.
Speaker 5: I mean, like I said, you didn't I don't think
Speaker 5: we should play this because I mean to play recently one.
Speaker 5: It's kind of long, but essentially the gist of it
Speaker 5: is this guy's a whistleblower. He reveals some information about
Speaker 5: like the kind of capabilities he claims they have essentially
Speaker 5: kind of blue beam type stuff to where they would essentially,
Speaker 5: you know, mind fuck you with technology. And I think
Speaker 5: the one thing, the only real thing we can take
Speaker 5: out of this, I mean, don't be wrong, you know,
Speaker 5: as we kind of joked about it, like we would
Speaker 5: like to be able to be like cool, like this
Speaker 5: kind of confirms the things we already knew. But it's
Speaker 5: like obviously could granted where this information is coming from.
Speaker 5: The nature of these whistleblowers is to kind of muddy
Speaker 5: that water is with information. I think, really, the only
Speaker 5: thing we can get out of that and even this
Speaker 5: this is a bit of a strikeer. I won't even
Speaker 5: say that logically speaking, we know this for sure, but
Speaker 5: I'd say this is probably the most logical thing we
Speaker 5: can get out of this is that they want us
Speaker 5: to know this. Yeah, so that that that would be
Speaker 5: That would be my thoughts, because I really I struggle
Speaker 5: to believe that that was just a slip of the tongue.
Speaker 5: I remember watching the vide he does kind of like, oh,
Speaker 5: kind of plays with like oh, I shouldn't say, like yeah,
Speaker 5: that's just like a way that you like seed information
Speaker 5: and make it sound sexier when you throw it out there,
Speaker 5: you know what I mean, Like I shouldn't telling you this,
Speaker 5: like oh really because of me? And the interviewer is
Speaker 5: gonna walk in and go, oh what do you mean?
Speaker 3: Like what what can you say? Exactly? Yeah?
Speaker 5: So you're like, what a great mind fuck to get
Speaker 5: someone to be like wait what Absolutely you've got him captivated.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and again you're seeing that confirmation bias like uh,
Speaker 3: and it come to fruition in real time and it's
Speaker 3: like something that you have to grapple with, uh, you know,
Speaker 3: in a moment in moment out basis or you're you know,
Speaker 3: as always vulnerable to false narratives, and so I'm just
Speaker 3: always kind of trying to, you know, just be very
Speaker 3: careful and the way I approach, especially any sort of
Speaker 3: like alleged transparency coming from any source that is clearly
Speaker 3: a deeply tied end with with you know, as they
Speaker 3: say once CIA always CIA, Right, So it's just like
Speaker 3: how much? But even then it's like, man, people like
Speaker 3: Ray McGovern, who I value so much as far as
Speaker 3: just their perspective on international conflicts and foreign policy and
Speaker 3: things of that nature, go on Scott Horton's show and
Speaker 3: things like that, and it's like, man, you know, it's
Speaker 3: never this black and white, cartoonish narrative of like, you know,
Speaker 3: good versus evil in that clear of certain terms.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: It's like, in many ways it's just so difficult to
Speaker 3: put it in those blatant, black and white concrete terms.
Speaker 3: It's almost impossible. And it's just excluding the human factor
Speaker 3: as well. You know, it's like there's just a says
Speaker 3: it best.
Speaker 5: He says, career is a fed fag sells an app
Speaker 5: to meet with aliens. You stand on a cube and
Speaker 5: meditate in the desert. Fucking for real, dude, is it
Speaker 5: a real thing he does where you go communicate to meditator?
Speaker 3: It lost her mind one of them. I mean, I
Speaker 3: can't remember the one that used to shit. It wasn't
Speaker 3: Damie Lovado, or it might have been, but it was
Speaker 3: one of one of those, one of those female celebrities
Speaker 3: that that basically went for like self help purposes in
Speaker 3: a way, and like I love the Aliens. What it
Speaker 3: was like, Uh, which movie is it when the lady
Speaker 3: is so out of her damn mind she's like welcoming
Speaker 3: the aliens and and uh to all the way up
Speaker 3: into our death where she's like happily embracing her own
Speaker 3: death just because she believed in this manufactured prophecy to
Speaker 3: such a deep level and extent psychologically.
Speaker 5: Joey Poope, he's saying John Dewey was pushing for alien
Speaker 5: invasion back in nineteen seventeen.
Speaker 3: Some guy.
Speaker 5: It's a yeah, you kind of like, you know, it's
Speaker 5: a lot of public school stuff.
Speaker 3: So yeah, oh no, he's even more Illuminati confirmed when
Speaker 3: it comes to write social engineering and all of those
Speaker 3: various practices from Tavistock. So yeah, John Dewey was I got, well,
Speaker 3: we're while I'm taking it and say, hey, you're right bro,
Speaker 3: no Mars attacks. It might have been Mars attack. I
Speaker 3: can't remember now.
Speaker 5: All right, now here is here's something I wanted to
Speaker 5: share with you. I talked, I told you about this
Speaker 5: before we started the show.
Speaker 2: But this is.
Speaker 5: Yeah, Walmart car insurance is nineteen dollars per months, guys.
Speaker 5: That's why I want to tell you.
Speaker 3: No, like, what the fuck.
Speaker 5: New sponsor, guys, Walmart's on our side. Uh no, no, no,
Speaker 5: this is I'm not gonna read the old article for you, guys.
Speaker 5: We'll save those type of things usually for like me
Speaker 5: or Austin and Solo type things. But uh, this is
Speaker 5: I thought you would find this interesting. That believe it
Speaker 5: was Doctri that actually shared this with us.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 5: This is a border patrol arrest former Russian mercenary and
Speaker 5: he aroma. This is a I bought a former Russian
Speaker 5: mercenary on Saturday. So this is January ninth. I don't
Speaker 5: know what a couple of weeks ago. Essentially, he was
Speaker 5: crossed the real Grand He waited across it, carrying two
Speaker 5: passports and four thousand dollars. He was a member of
Speaker 5: the Wagner Group, which, if you recall correctly, the Wagner
Speaker 5: Group was the one that tried to lead that kup
Speaker 5: in Russia.
Speaker 3: Again, Russia, what the fuck?
Speaker 4: Like what?
Speaker 5: He was a citizen in the National Kazakhstan carrying a
Speaker 5: Russian passport, a passport from Kayazhakstan four thousand bucks and
Speaker 5: sixty thousand pesos. They found a drone as well. Yeah,
Speaker 5: so he was part of the Wagner Group, Pala military organization.
Speaker 5: I found some photos of me. Actually kind of looks
Speaker 5: like a dork, which makes it even weirder. Like, Yo,
Speaker 5: this dude was like working for a fucking Wagner group
Speaker 5: and just kind of looks like any old dork, you know,
Speaker 5: you know what I mean, Like you're like, oh shit,
Speaker 5: that's kind of freaky that that dude could probably fucking
Speaker 5: kill me, or has buddy is clicked up to where
Speaker 5: him and all his buddies will try to kill me. Yeah,
Speaker 5: so no, this is a This is essentially Russia's blackwater.
Speaker 5: But even then, in a funny thing, they're kind of
Speaker 5: like our blackwater. It seems like considering the recent I mean, obviously,
Speaker 5: I think it's probably a little bit more complicated than that,
Speaker 5: but still in that I mean, considering the considering the
Speaker 5: recent events in Russia, is it casts a little bit
Speaker 5: a little doubt of like, what the fuck is going
Speaker 5: on here? Like it's not I know, this story is
Speaker 5: seated out there to be like, look Russia bad, Like
Speaker 5: look that some Russian mercenary tries again in America. But
Speaker 5: you're like, I'm not entirely sure that comes down to
Speaker 5: Russia bad. I mean, I don't. I mean, it could be.
Speaker 3: I have no idea.
Speaker 5: But the point is, it's like, considering the recent actions,
Speaker 5: it's like, I'm not entirely sure that's like whatever. I mean,
Speaker 5: just just so you guys, now, apparently it's not a
Speaker 5: big deal to cross the border because I mean, I
Speaker 5: guess he basically got like a nothing sentence. It's a
Speaker 5: federal misdemeanor, but he was up for a fifteen day sentence.
Speaker 5: I think I think he may have gotten the fifteen
Speaker 5: day sentence. It doesn't really matter. But yeah, and he
Speaker 5: didn't really say shit. Really basically, the only thing I
Speaker 5: think he said at any point was saying like yet,
Speaker 5: but just no, yeah, yeah like that. So I'm pretty
Speaker 5: sure he said basically nothing to them, I'm sure, as
Speaker 5: he had probably had a lawyer who did. But yeah,
Speaker 5: he basically, from what I recall, he only said like
Speaker 5: one or two words, and one of which was yet,
Speaker 5: So yeah, weird ship. I just thought that you would
Speaker 5: find that interesting that we have Russian mercenaries which seemed
Speaker 5: to have very strong connections to our fucking our deep state,
Speaker 5: if if one were to guess, and they're just fucking
Speaker 5: crossing borders, willy nilly, Yeah, I don't make of it,
Speaker 5: but it's weird, I thought. Considering the Wagner group connection,
Speaker 5: Oh yeah.
Speaker 3: For sure, especially I think of didn't that ultimately end
Speaker 3: with that plane going down with the Russian oligarch of.
Speaker 5: The dude running Wagner ended up the Western puppet. Basically
Speaker 5: that was Yeah, it looks like Putin often, which, like
Speaker 5: I get it.
Speaker 3: What else do you do in that? I don't know,
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 5: If someone I mean, like, I don't know, I mean,
Speaker 5: would you really have been like that upset if, like,
Speaker 5: I don't know, let's say Trump, let's say Brandon Ralph,
Speaker 5: let's say you just fucking just got you know, something
Speaker 5: bizarre happened to him, and it was very obvious that
Speaker 5: somebody did something.
Speaker 3: Did anyone really be like.
Speaker 5: Oh my god, really, like, dude, you try to kill him?
Speaker 5: Like yeah, we might be like, yeah, you're not supposed
Speaker 5: to do that in this country, but it's like, I mean, dude,
Speaker 5: that's like literally like the dude running this place, and
Speaker 5: you try to kill him, like exactly, there's literally an
Speaker 5: expression like you know, you come for the king. So
Speaker 5: I don't know whatever, I mean, I'm not necessarily condoning
Speaker 5: Putin fucking assassinating his citizens. But I tried to assassinate him. Oh,
Speaker 5: I'll just kind of let that one slide.
Speaker 3: I guess, Oh my god. I mean, you have to
Speaker 3: defend against threats and proxy forces, which are very clearly,
Speaker 3: you know, just a a recycled technique from the deep State,
Speaker 3: as far as the you know, the the Pentagon and
Speaker 3: Western backed forces. We've been staging color revolutions on Russian
Speaker 3: border states for how fucking long. So I mean, that's
Speaker 3: that's what you always have to consider, especially when it's
Speaker 3: like we were we've been threatening, but we but the
Speaker 3: US State Department threatening but char a lesad for how long?
Speaker 3: You know, like the only reason that that was even
Speaker 3: allowed to take place was because Russia and Iran essentially
Speaker 3: made a deal in a back room deal to to
Speaker 3: allow uh that to really kind of happen. But still
Speaker 3: it's uh, it's interesting, and it's just more war criminals, uh,
Speaker 3: you know, portraying war crimes. So it's it's not really
Speaker 3: shocked to me. Ever, when when things in this nature
Speaker 3: take place on the and you know, international geopolitical chess board,
Speaker 3: I guess. But yeah, anyway, I think that what I
Speaker 3: really wanted to mention though about the Aliens before we
Speaker 3: get off the UFO sye op entirely was there. There's
Speaker 3: a I want everybody who's interested to go read this
Speaker 3: three part series on the Last American Vagabond written by
Speaker 3: Matthew Irritt.
Speaker 5: I actually have that saved in in my little bookmark
Speaker 5: thing too, because I was going to touch on it
Speaker 5: some point. I haven't read it yet, but I assume
Speaker 5: that might be something either covered in the show or
Speaker 5: something along those lines. I knew it was like that
Speaker 5: later for sure. I believe the name of the guy
Speaker 5: who wrote the piece, so it's not the last American
Speaker 5: bagbone guy, but someone who who contributed their work to
Speaker 5: their their site.
Speaker 3: So nice. Yeah, and I know that like through reading
Speaker 3: for through the first two parts because the third one
Speaker 3: just dropped, which was very convenient timing. It's perfect actually,
Speaker 3: and uh but but yeah, I thought it was fascinating
Speaker 3: because it really And by the way, that's where the
Speaker 3: picture of that mummified I'll show you real quick because
Speaker 3: it's hilarious. But that picture of the mummified a et corpse.
Speaker 3: Look at this thing, dude, like that is just ridiculous.
Speaker 5: Is that the way you thought I was talking about earlier?
Speaker 3: Were you talking about something else? Okay, Okay, I know
Speaker 3: the new one circulated, but that one was so funny.
Speaker 5: That one was ridiculous.
Speaker 3: It just killed me. But uh but yeah, although I
Speaker 3: will say.
Speaker 5: Like scroll back up to it. I mean, uh, I mean,
Speaker 5: if if any of you guys out there know about
Speaker 5: the new one I'm talking about going around, maybe we'll
Speaker 5: see it in a minute. I'm not sure. I don't
Speaker 5: know if you have it somewhere. If you do, if
Speaker 5: if cool, if not, whatever, But it almost as ridiculous
Speaker 5: as it retard as that is, it almost looks like
Speaker 5: if you look at like whatever that new one was
Speaker 5: made out of, it looks you could almost surmise that
Speaker 5: when it died and shriveled up, that it could look
Speaker 5: like something like that, almost like frog like, because it
Speaker 5: had that kind of almost like a you know what
Speaker 5: I mean, Like that was one of the first thoughts
Speaker 5: I had. And I saw that and thought about that,
Speaker 5: I'm like, I mean, obviously, I don't know. I'm not
Speaker 5: saying they're coordinating it, but I'm like, huh, I mean,
Speaker 5: obviously that first one is fucking retarded, the one that
Speaker 5: was the one they revealed in Mexico a while back. Yeah,
Speaker 5: which is absolutely ridiculous. We're insane. They legit, but like
Speaker 5: in their their Halls of Congress or whatever they call that,
Speaker 5: they legit were like doing their own disclosure project type
Speaker 5: stuff and this was what they got carded out, so which,
Speaker 5: you know what. That adds another little interesting little wrinkle.
Speaker 5: It's almost as if this is like a worldwide thing
Speaker 5: where it's almost as if there's like a traveling circus
Speaker 5: show that goes from like fucking country to country. I
Speaker 5: mean obviously not know, you're not exactly, but it almost
Speaker 5: feels like this kind of works its way through. You're like, oh,
Speaker 5: well we'll try in this country. Oh we'll try in
Speaker 5: that country and it's just as ridiculous Carnie bullshit and
Speaker 5: almost and everyone's just like maybe they're just like getting
Speaker 5: better as they go. I don't know. We'll practice over
Speaker 5: in Mexico and hone our trade before we bring it
Speaker 5: up to the big dogs over in USA. Like, I
Speaker 5: don't know what this is, you know, just it has
Speaker 5: that feeling because other countries have done it and they're
Speaker 5: also feeding out the same bullshit, So it's not like
Speaker 5: we're getting where some countries are like, here's that real shit.
Speaker 5: Like no, they're seeming to all of them be pulling
Speaker 5: the wool over eyes, but in a way where they're
Speaker 5: kind of being like, see here it is, and you're like,
Speaker 5: wait what you know? I don't know, which is bizarre
Speaker 5: because ten years ago, we wouldn't be buying the idea
Speaker 5: that the garment's trying to reveal to us.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 5: It's just like this newer phenomenon where now like different
Speaker 5: countries are doing this thing to where they're like, oh,
Speaker 5: we're gonna reveal some stuff for you, and right.
Speaker 3: Thing, I wonder if you know the purpose of limited
Speaker 3: hangouts is to reveal a portion of the truth right
Speaker 3: for deceptive reasons, you know, to clearly kind of derail
Speaker 3: the attempted and you know, dissidents who are investigating these things,
Speaker 3: and you know personally as and and I think that,
Speaker 3: you know, it's just like, especially when you consider that
Speaker 3: this was all very much within the framework of psychological operations,
Speaker 3: in psychological warfare as far as just seeding these these
Speaker 3: narratives into the public consciences.
Speaker 5: That got my mind thinking because I just proposed that
Speaker 5: idea of almost like a traveling you know, circus show
Speaker 5: kind of, and then I was just thinking about it.
Speaker 5: Where's one of the Like maybe they wouldn't say this
Speaker 5: is the original, but if I was to draw to
Speaker 5: some sort of most notable claim and most spooky ist
Speaker 5: claim and draw it back to its origins, it's got
Speaker 5: to be. I can't remember the dude's name, but it's
Speaker 5: that guy who ran the space program for Israel. So
Speaker 5: I'm like, wait, yeah, because are you just not some
Speaker 5: because like the traveling show, like was it kind of
Speaker 5: like oh he did this and then from then on,
Speaker 5: like you know what I mean, it almost seems like
Speaker 5: there's like an origin there, and like, if you know
Speaker 5: much about Israel and there's spooky shit. It's like, okay,
Speaker 5: well was this just some like intel opt from the start,
Speaker 5: And it was just like we have this this big
Speaker 5: guy seeds us out there, gives it like a tiny
Speaker 5: bit of credibility. From there, then we have a traveling
Speaker 5: show that goes from country to country, seeds out information
Speaker 5: here and there. We'll go to some of the poor,
Speaker 5: less notable countries to you know, maybe kind of work
Speaker 5: out some of the king drops some the more ridiculous
Speaker 5: ship and then well, you know, and then buy it
Speaker 5: after a while. Then we bring to the US and
Speaker 5: now it's big time. I don't know, you know what
Speaker 5: I mean, Like it kind of seems almost like a
Speaker 5: perfectly little wrapped up little massade up almost, you know
Speaker 5: what I mean, like or masade or the what or
Speaker 5: the octopus or whatever you want to call it, some
Speaker 5: sort of all.
Speaker 3: Connected international private network right with with overlapping loyalties with
Speaker 3: these secret fraternal organizations of powerful influence that we discussed
Speaker 3: on a daily basis almost and the dame as.
Speaker 5: Notable as fuck, and like do you think about like
Speaker 5: we're you know, being part of like I mean Israel,
Speaker 5: I wouldn't say, is a world power. But he's it's
Speaker 5: like it's like an it's kind of the equivalent of
Speaker 5: like an a like Hollywood actor. I mean, although in
Speaker 5: a sense like he's kind of really controlling things, if
Speaker 5: that makes sense. But yeah, so it's wee the major
Speaker 5: powers doing that's dropping this information. And I would say
Speaker 5: probably that I really didn't empower.
Speaker 6: I don't know.
Speaker 5: The more I think about it, I think there might
Speaker 5: be something to that that him dropping that ship.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and the Rothschild connection to the the foundation of
Speaker 3: the state of Israel and the Balfour declaration get the
Speaker 3: fuck out of here, the idea that they aren't helping
Speaker 3: with with as far as just being the vehicle of
Speaker 3: of of creating the foundation for the globalist infrastructure, I mean,
Speaker 3: get the fuck out of here. Like it's clearly been
Speaker 3: a convenient tool for the United for the Western Empire,
Speaker 3: which you know, I think that these we're all dealing
Speaker 3: in misconceptions because we've been dealt this disadvantaged hand where
Speaker 3: we can't quite assess the true paradigm that we're living in.
Speaker 3: And another strong.
Speaker 5: Little component is a Israel Israelians. There's also that weird
Speaker 5: thing Israel. The whole component of what Judaism is, if
Speaker 5: you like, if you bring it back to its roots,
Speaker 5: A lot of it does come down and you look
Speaker 5: at the different entities that you know, claim Jewishness, like
Speaker 5: you know, the Black Israelites obviously Jewish. I mean, there's
Speaker 5: you know, the Ashkar Nazis. There's always just like what
Speaker 5: is like, A lot of this does come back come
Speaker 5: down to who the real Aryans are. It's ridiculous as
Speaker 5: that sounds, but the Aryans when there was actually thought,
Speaker 5: you know, I've been listening a lot of Robert Sepper
Speaker 5: the that they was like the Jews were like a
Speaker 5: one of the families, you know, like the the whole tribes,
Speaker 5: those were like essentially Aryans. So like the if anything,
Speaker 5: a lot of the a lot of the contentions supposedly
Speaker 5: the so called Aryan people or have with Jews is
Speaker 5: that they aren't real Arians or whatever. I don't know,
Speaker 5: I'm not saying I buy this thing. But and then
Speaker 5: that comes down to these Aryans were almost like an
Speaker 5: advanced ancient human race, which a lot of people couldn
Speaker 5: could say it's like Aliens. I don't know, there's a
Speaker 5: lot of that I'm connecting there. I just find it
Speaker 5: funny that, like, you know, it's part of the root,
Speaker 5: which you know, ties a lot into like Nazism and
Speaker 5: stuff like that. It's kind of like who the real Jews,
Speaker 5: who the real Airs are uh into? Because yeah, that's
Speaker 5: kind of like at their root. So in a certain sense,
Speaker 5: like if you get deep in the sauce of some
Speaker 5: Judaism type stuff, they do are kind of thinking that
Speaker 5: they're the original, this part of the gods chosen people
Speaker 5: the better than the rest, Like they are the real Arians.
Speaker 5: They are this like some some sort of entity cutting
Speaker 5: you know, cut a cut cut cut, separate from the rest, essentially,
Speaker 5: like you know, some sort of advance alien like they
Speaker 5: are closer to God like something like there's so many
Speaker 5: I don't know, there's a lot there.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 5: I just thought that was fun. I'm just I'm just
Speaker 5: doing word association this point, but I don't know a lot.
Speaker 5: There's a lot with the whole aralien narrative. And then
Speaker 5: how that ties into you know, I mean, this is
Speaker 5: why you get so into like ufology, when you get
Speaker 5: into like Nazism.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, absolutely, yeah, yeah, And I think that that
Speaker 3: was one of the reasons that paper Clip was so
Speaker 3: successful with with NASA and the foundation of NASA, and
Speaker 3: as far as Warner von Braun, you know, being brought
Speaker 3: over and and all these various NASA administrators who who
Speaker 3: officially were just entirely spooks dealing in mind control and
Speaker 3: psychological operations as well as you know, the deceptive framework
Speaker 3: of how can we convince the public right to further
Speaker 3: allow us to extort their taxpayer dollars for you know,
Speaker 3: these these private interests truly, which is really what I think.
Speaker 3: NASA is just a front company, as as is most
Speaker 3: of these organizations in their in their infancy and their
Speaker 3: foundational purposes. You know, so maybe now more than ever
Speaker 3: they're serving you know, layered uh right, like a layered
Speaker 3: purpose for but they're still at its foundation is the
Speaker 3: operational standpoint of the reasons behind the organization's existence. And
Speaker 3: I think that's why you see as soon as paper
Speaker 3: Clip at the end of World War Two, as soon
Speaker 3: as paper Clips, you know, succeeds and and we draft
Speaker 3: all these Nazis and we essentially we create the space program, right,
Speaker 3: and we start seeing the first UFO sidings, and we
Speaker 3: have the first UFO flying saucer craze of nineteen forty,
Speaker 3: nineteen forty eight or nineteen fifty one, I can't remember now,
Speaker 3: but it's literally at that exact same time, which instantly
Speaker 3: should raise your red flags and raise your eyebrows. And
Speaker 3: you know, so it's again you just see the special
Speaker 3: interest group standing tall behind the operation and in no
Speaker 3: way it should we be considering it as a as
Speaker 3: a coincidence at this point. And so you have members
Speaker 3: like Lord mount Batten from the Anglo Irish vice Ring
Speaker 3: connected directly to Cancora and Jimmy Saville. Right, you have
Speaker 3: that motherfucker directly involved in nineteen fifty talking about UFOs. Buddy.
Speaker 3: Literally you take his quote, you compare it to Ronald
Speaker 3: Reagan and say who said it first? I mean, what
Speaker 3: the fuck is that? And it goes far more into
Speaker 3: the past than even Lord mount Batten in nineteen fifty.
Speaker 3: You have in nineteen eighteen, you have members of the
Speaker 3: royal family coming out with statements such as this. So
Speaker 3: this is something worthwhile. There's only two things I think
Speaker 3: we should mention and then I won't even get into
Speaker 3: this article because I think we should like maybe bring
Speaker 3: it to the table at some point in the future,
Speaker 3: especially considering there are three parts, and the third part
Speaker 3: that just released has to do with with like, look
Speaker 3: at the honestly it says the beginning of it is
Speaker 3: a century of UFO psyops exposed spook scientologists, satanists in
Speaker 3: the new mind wars. And so it's legitimately exactly what
Speaker 3: we talk about often, right, and what I've almost been
Speaker 3: under the impression of for quite some time. But again,
Speaker 3: so you have the direct connection to Lord Mount bat
Speaker 3: but also a direct connection to the Rand Corporation, and
Speaker 3: so that ties in Laurel Canyon and in the Project
Speaker 3: for a New American Century and look Out Mountain Laboratory,
Speaker 3: and and so you have this component that is kind
Speaker 3: of just overrepresented in every aspect of these operations, and
Speaker 3: that is the psycho war, psychological warfare, tactics and planning
Speaker 3: behind it all. And that's why, uh, this is important
Speaker 3: to just read this one part, which is what I
Speaker 3: posted on Twitter too about it, only because and again
Speaker 3: I need to stop expecting people to read things because
Speaker 3: I post too much shit because it's so annoying. But
Speaker 3: I'll just be reading through stuff and I screenshot too
Speaker 3: much shit. But I think it's always like the attempt
Speaker 3: is only to further expose people to these lines of
Speaker 3: interest and these you know, plausible alternative narratives. So potentially
Speaker 3: they'll go and read these long form artist and it'll
Speaker 3: send them down the same rabbit holes that I found
Speaker 3: myself and potentially convince you otherwise and have a positive
Speaker 3: effect on you psychologically potentially as well. But anyway, so
Speaker 3: this guy, Robert Stanton from the Rand Corporation, published a
Speaker 3: revealing report on April fourteenth, nineteen fifty. The title alone
Speaker 3: is almost a smoking gun exploitation of superstitions for purposes
Speaker 3: of psychological warfare, and it outlined the need to identify
Speaker 3: superstitions in folklore and target populations around the world in
Speaker 3: order to manipulate the masses. The reports author wrote, what
Speaker 3: types of superstitious appeal will be best adapted to the
Speaker 3: various audiences to be propagandized. A study of local superstitions
Speaker 3: as related in popular folklore might be profitable in providing
Speaker 3: answers to these questions. What superstitions are peculiar to Eastern Europeans,
Speaker 3: to Russians, to the various nationalities of the Soviet Union,
Speaker 3: What superstitions are prevalent amongst peasants, among combat troops or
Speaker 3: airmen among civilians, What evidence is there that, given members
Speaker 3: of the enemy elite are addicted to certain kinds of superstitions.
Speaker 3: The report astutely noted, it seems likely that superstitions flourish
Speaker 3: an atmosphere of tension and insecurity. And then the only
Speaker 3: other part I wanted to mention was was this is
Speaker 3: I kind of think a very important statement to understand
Speaker 3: had been made. And of course ties in Lord mount
Speaker 3: Batten and the Anglo Irish vice ring, and we know
Speaker 3: Lord mount Batten had a pension for young boys, and
Speaker 3: you know he was essentially sassinated right off the coast
Speaker 3: on Robert Maxwell's style execution. But so the CIA plays
Speaker 3: the UFO game right and basically, while US government UFO
Speaker 3: investigations occurred in piecemeal from form starting in nineteen forty
Speaker 3: seven under Project sign followed by Project Grudge, the most
Speaker 3: influential government sponsored UFO research project was created in nineteen
Speaker 3: forty nine with the UK's Flying Saucer Working Party under
Speaker 3: the chairmanship of Sir Henry Tizzard, who we have already met.
Speaker 3: So he yeah, he's a again, he's a psychological warfare
Speaker 3: planner as well, and very much involved. Yeah exactly, And
Speaker 3: so Tizzard's Flying Saucer working party was carrying out the
Speaker 3: orders of Lord Lewis mount Batten, former Allied commander of
Speaker 3: the Pacific Fleet during World War Two, who noted the
Speaker 3: usefulness of a potential alien threat at uniting the world together.
Speaker 3: Speaking in nineteen fifty, Lord mount Batten stated the fact
Speaker 3: that they can hover and accelerate away from the Earth's
Speaker 3: gravity again and even revolve around a V two in
Speaker 3: America shows they are far ahead of us. If they
Speaker 3: really come over in a big way, that might settle
Speaker 3: the capitalist communist war. If the human race wishes to survive,
Speaker 3: they must band together. And then, of course, even in
Speaker 3: nineteen forty seven, those remarks by mount Batten were allegedly
Speaker 3: echoed by the British Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden, who stated,
Speaker 3: sometimes I think the people of this distracted planet will
Speaker 3: never really get together until they find someone in Mars
Speaker 3: to get mad against. But anyway, it just goes to show.
Speaker 3: And then, of course John Dewey is mentioned right here right,
Speaker 3: and he says in nineteen seventeen, yeah, yeah, exactly, Fabian
Speaker 3: socialist and the best way to unite all the nations
Speaker 3: on this globe would be an attack from some other planet.
Speaker 3: In the face of such an alien enemy, people would
Speaker 3: respond with a sense of their unity and purpose. So
Speaker 3: it's just, uh, just it's honestly, it's it's par for
Speaker 3: the course when it comes to all of this, especially
Speaker 3: if you consider Terence McKenna and kind of hit his
Speaker 3: book background in regard to all the different LSD experiments
Speaker 3: and things of that nature. This dude right here, so
Speaker 3: his whole, his whole. Basically he went on tour right
Speaker 3: at a certain point, giving these interesting lectures and and
Speaker 3: on on human consciousness and and right and and how
Speaker 3: to take these heroic doses of M D M A
Speaker 3: and and uh, you know, psilocybin and and right and
Speaker 3: all these different things which you know there there's value
Speaker 3: to a psychedelic trip, I think. But gun positive, yes, absolutely, no,
Speaker 3: I will do it. Around the time I quit smoking
Speaker 3: to like nicotine, I'd say that'd gone on. I've done
Speaker 3: a little bit of microdiet dosing, like probably the month prior,
Speaker 3: and it was just really just like I just one
Speaker 3: day it was just like why am I doing this?
Speaker 3: And I just stopped and I've I've heard that's comment
Speaker 3: with people who like messed with like llucigens and stop
Speaker 3: some sort of destructive behavior or whatever. They really just
Speaker 3: kind of just get like what am I doing. It's
Speaker 3: almost like, so I think there's something to it. Obviously,
Speaker 3: I think there's other things as well, but yes, I do.
Speaker 3: Also on the other side, I think there's something too
Speaker 3: just completely blasting out of here. I've I've messed with
Speaker 3: the decent amount locigs in my life, but never like
Speaker 3: the I've never really gone past the point to where
Speaker 3: like I'm blasted to where like I mean, I've seen
Speaker 3: things that aren't there, but more like it's usually just
Speaker 3: like in the level of distorting things that aren't there.
Speaker 3: That's the deep thoughts I've never really So I think
Speaker 3: I am open to the idea that like maybe some
Speaker 3: of the some some some substances and certain and maybe
Speaker 3: certain doses or something can or you know, or maybe
Speaker 3: even that and you're just in a certain state of
Speaker 3: mind where you're more suggestible to be fucked with at
Speaker 3: that time.
Speaker 5: I'm open to the idea of it. So because I
Speaker 5: know they just said, like, oh, this guy is talking
Speaker 5: to aliens and is subconscious not like kind of a thing,
Speaker 5: but obviously it's not demons, and it's up or aliens
Speaker 5: in different dimensions. Obviously it's not demons and subconscious like.
Speaker 5: So I don't know. I mean, I don't really I
Speaker 5: don't really have much too strong a thoughts when it
Speaker 5: comes to the hallucigenic side of like contacting aliens inside
Speaker 5: and stuff. I mean, those could be completely you know,
Speaker 5: like materialistic, and those could just be your mind doing chemicals,
Speaker 5: and those are just spooks that are fucking with you
Speaker 5: telling you that you're you know, you're gonna be interacting
Speaker 5: with entities. I don't know where there could be entities.
Speaker 5: I mean, I've noticed nothing but positive effects. But I've
Speaker 5: also never really been like I want to get blasted
Speaker 5: all the time and or do really even hardcore It
Speaker 5: doesn't I mean, especially if you're someone who's toiter the
Speaker 5: lucidens a little bit. I don't know, that doesn't seem
Speaker 5: that appealing to me. Like hardcore trips are not really
Speaker 5: like a they're not the same as like other drugs.
Speaker 5: Like me and you have both had opiate problems. Are
Speaker 5: like You're like, oh, this is fun. I want to
Speaker 5: do opiates. This feels great. You're like, it's it's different
Speaker 5: than with the lucigens. You do it and you're like, okay,
Speaker 5: well cool, I got some interesting thoughts.
Speaker 1: Out of that.
Speaker 5: I don't want to do that again tomorrow because I
Speaker 5: have shit to do or whatever. I don't know. It's
Speaker 5: not like, it's not addictive. And that's and even if
Speaker 5: in I mean, I guess there are probably some people
Speaker 5: who develop like a you know, habitual behavior with it,
Speaker 5: but I never did. And if anything, most people I
Speaker 5: know have the exact opposite, where they're like, it's very
Speaker 5: much like a once in a blue moon thing or
Speaker 5: something exactly.
Speaker 3: That's most people. I've heard only very rare occurrences of,
Speaker 3: like people being addicted to the five and you know
Speaker 3: DMT the toad, but even that is justordinary. The toad
Speaker 3: produces d MT. Yeah, yeah, that's like a more potent
Speaker 3: form of d MT, which I found interesting.
Speaker 5: It's just the toad producing lucagen. I just know it's
Speaker 5: d MT. I know DMT is produced from hyahuasca and
Speaker 5: they can get the the actual and there's a difference
Speaker 5: between the ayahuasca and the d MT, like the actual
Speaker 5: chemical form. Yeah, I mean, obviously they're the same active ingredient.
Speaker 5: But with the in the ayahuasca form, the ayahuasca essentially
Speaker 5: provides enzymes that it caused it to break down slower.
Speaker 5: So the difference between like a d MT trip or
Speaker 5: an ayahuasca trip is the same active ingredient, but with
Speaker 5: the ayahuasca, your body processes it slower, so you're gonna
Speaker 5: put a longer trip and probably not as intense. I mean,
Speaker 5: still be pretty damn intense, but not like a fucking
Speaker 5: rocket ship going up, and it's more like.
Speaker 3: A more like a roller coaster gradual. Yeah, for sure,
Speaker 3: you know, coming up type thing. Yeah, that's what I've heard. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I remember that one thing that I thought was one
Speaker 3: of the coolest shows on HBO ever that I watched
Speaker 3: was Hamilton's Pharmacopeia. I don't know, you know that he's
Speaker 3: in just as far as like certain episodes were so
Speaker 3: freaking interesting, man, Like there was one on five d
Speaker 3: MT almost positive, where where they showed the process of
Speaker 3: like how they were or extracting the toad venom from
Speaker 3: or the actual DMT from the toad. It was like
Speaker 3: you basically you you smear the toad on this glass.
Speaker 3: Like it's super weird. But yeah, anyway, it's a I
Speaker 3: do think there's value in psychedelics, but I think it's also.
Speaker 5: You see as a drenochrome episode.
Speaker 3: No, actually, no, holy I mean, I didn't.
Speaker 5: Call it adrenochrome. I'm gonna have to find it later.
Speaker 5: It's heavily implied that this is something close to and adrenochrome.
Speaker 5: And it's even more interesting than I need to remember
Speaker 5: this person's name. I saved it once and I'll have
Speaker 5: to I have it probably saved somewhere, and it's this
Speaker 5: lady either a dude or lady has a weird voice.
Speaker 5: I couldn't tell what they are, but they were apparently
Speaker 5: some sort of scholar who's done a ton of looking
Speaker 5: into like drugs and how they relate to like ancient
Speaker 5: times like Greece and Rome and stuff, and like they
Speaker 5: found this kind of like ties into oracles and like
Speaker 5: it even ties into like Jesus and so it because
Speaker 5: I mean, might get a little more little blastemis for
Speaker 5: some people, but obviously don't have to buy all of it.
Speaker 5: I'm not gonna saying I buy all of it. It
Speaker 5: was a little bit crazy and hard to process that
Speaker 5: whole episode. But they go into the idea of certain
Speaker 5: drugs and antiquity that seem to have been you process
Speaker 5: through humans. And they use an example of like, you know,
Speaker 5: the the like with the mushrooms, where certain certain cultures
Speaker 5: would like take the urine from like the elk after
Speaker 5: they eat them and would use that for to trip
Speaker 5: on because I guess somehow that would like you would
Speaker 5: it be more concentrated for the actual active ingredients and
Speaker 5: the urine. And I guess they were going into different
Speaker 5: things along those lines, and that obviously, if you're talking
Speaker 5: about getting a drug and processing it through a human,
Speaker 5: you're not that far off from getting into theoreticals on
Speaker 5: something akin to a drenochrome. And it seems like they're
Speaker 5: kind of implying that, and I mean, I can't remember
Speaker 5: exactly the combination. It's not even as simple as like
Speaker 5: the oh, just a dreamal you know, fluid or or
Speaker 5: whatever from a person. It's a little more complicated than that.
Speaker 5: But it's really interesting, and there's adrenochrome is implied in it,
Speaker 5: and there's multiple other forms, and they kind of go
Speaker 5: into how they think maybe these oracles of the past
Speaker 5: were like literally like essentially producing drugs and weird odd ways,
Speaker 5: and then imbibing them and I know, it's really interesting.
Speaker 5: I'll have to find it. Maybe some of the chat
Speaker 5: might know what I'm talking about. Very weird, very odd episode,
Speaker 5: and it really was like, what the fuck sounds Yeah,
Speaker 5: it implies that Jesus might have been on some adrenochrome.
Speaker 5: Oh my god, it's really bizarre that. I wish I
Speaker 5: could remember the exact way they say it. It was produced,
Speaker 5: but it was obviously like an evil type of way.
Speaker 5: I can't remember if it was like through sexual type
Speaker 5: things or if it was through blood or something, but
Speaker 5: it was obviously unethical to create, and the person was
Speaker 5: very still focused on, like.
Speaker 3: Well, what do you think, Hamilton?
Speaker 5: Do you think we could make this? I mean, and
Speaker 5: then they kept being like, well, I don't know, maybe
Speaker 5: if we could find a.
Speaker 3: Way to not do that thing.
Speaker 5: You're like, yeah, but that might be like part of it,
Speaker 5: and they're like, do you think we could do it?
Speaker 5: And you're like what the the same very focused on
Speaker 5: like wanting to do it, and what the fuck, dude?
Speaker 3: Interesting.
Speaker 5: I don't know, I'll have to find it later. It's
Speaker 5: very very very fucking interesting. But yeah, sorry, completely side
Speaker 5: beside the side.
Speaker 3: Hey man, it's worth talking about, because I do think that,
Speaker 3: you know, certain people, I don't know if I think
Speaker 3: the brain chemistry of each individual is so very different
Speaker 3: that you know, you can't quite tell. I know that
Speaker 3: I've talked with people who they had, like a good
Speaker 3: friend I talked with once about, you know, just having
Speaker 3: sessions doing d MT or ayahuasca or something for some
Speaker 3: sort of like actual attempted positive approach get something out
Speaker 3: of it philosophically perhaps, but still it was interesting because
Speaker 3: his perspective was his brother had done it once and
Speaker 3: had a psychological break and legitimately went schizophrenic. And I
Speaker 3: was like, holy shit, like actually of course predisposed to
Speaker 3: kind of having that potential as far as like, you know,
Speaker 3: how schizophrenia apparently is like that in certain genetic capacity,
Speaker 3: almost apparently, which I was unaware of. But yeah, so
Speaker 3: he I guess this happens occasionally, though, is that in
Speaker 3: certain people's brain chemistry, whenever they're introduced to these various psychedelics,
Speaker 3: it has this just extraordinarily negative impact and they never
Speaker 3: come out of it right in the same right, they
Speaker 3: come out entirely affected in a negative way. And that
Speaker 3: so I can ever like suggest it for everyone, but
Speaker 3: I do think that it has some value for certain
Speaker 3: people who are very much questioning their reality and attempting
Speaker 3: to answer the unanswerable answerable questions, right and and I
Speaker 3: think that's what leads a lot of people to you know,
Speaker 3: conducting you know, uh, certain ceremonies that are similar to
Speaker 3: that and uh but I think it's in in if
Speaker 3: you're approaching it in the right way, like you know,
Speaker 3: almost uh, like a Native American ceremony for the peace
Speaker 3: pipe or something right where you're attempting to to gain
Speaker 3: some sort of therapeutic solution and conclusion from it. Who knows.
Speaker 3: I mean, perhaps you'll you'll, uh, you know, you'll come
Speaker 3: out of it with something worthwhile.
Speaker 5: But by the way, I found a uh, well, I mean,
Speaker 5: I see you're you got this and this is really important.
Speaker 5: We should definitely need to cover this about Stephen Gris,
Speaker 5: this is really interesting. But I just found while you
Speaker 5: were talking a video related to what we talked about earlier,
Speaker 5: about that fucking methed out dude and about him talking
Speaker 5: about the spiritual experience he had. What we'll play it
Speaker 5: in a minute. Is it's bizarre saying I was possessed
Speaker 5: by the most beautiful spirit. It was a very feminine energy.
Speaker 5: It felt like the spirit of God, but not in
Speaker 5: any mask in this sense. UFO whistleblower Jake Barber speaks
Speaker 5: on spiritual experience had will working on UFO crash retrievals,
Speaker 5: so it'll be interesting to watch. I do have something
Speaker 5: I do want to bring up. I meant to cover
Speaker 5: this on my Morning Dead the Morning or my Morning
Speaker 5: show yesterday, but I think I accidently x that tab.
Speaker 5: This is something rage Child shared. But I just want
Speaker 5: to let you know, yeah, we definitely should keep going
Speaker 5: this because like, holy shit, I didn't I just, you know,
Speaker 5: look this and saw Stephen mc Stephen Greer hired by
Speaker 5: Lawrence Rockefeller. I'm I'm sure that's perfectly that's perfectly good
Speaker 5: reason for that, you know, No, I mean whatever, I mean,
Speaker 5: you know, rich people in need doctors too, And yeah,
Speaker 5: I mean someone's got to disclose stuff.
Speaker 3: I guess right, you know, so I know, yeah, go ahead, Okay.
Speaker 3: So this, of course is during the Clinton White House years,
Speaker 3: which there are direct ties to the Clinton's when it
Speaker 3: comes to Stephen Greer and the Disclosure Project. Not only that,
Speaker 3: but Lawrence Rockefeller has effectively sponsored and financed the disclosure project,
Speaker 3: and it was all it was all very much workshops.
Speaker 3: People don't like UFOs often, I'm telling you, man like it.
Speaker 3: It seems as if this is a manufactured psychological system
Speaker 3: of influence. Honestly, that's what it feels like. But but
Speaker 3: so you have to see, like whenever this this occurred again,
Speaker 3: this is perfectly in line with when the disclosure project
Speaker 3: was going public, just before you know, the the uh
Speaker 3: the press briefing that was given that like blew everyone
Speaker 3: away at the I forget where the location was, but anyway,
Speaker 3: it's it's that super famous location where they had the
Speaker 3: UFO press briefing and public disclosure for the first time.
Speaker 3: And it was in like the very late nineties, and
Speaker 3: and and yeah, it was. It kind of blew everyone
Speaker 3: away and brought it really into the mainstream. As far
Speaker 3: as it was before that, it had very much been
Speaker 3: the the extraterrestrial narrative and any sort of UFO you know,
Speaker 3: conversation had been entirely dismissed and kind of in the
Speaker 3: I would say, much more in the conspiracy theory vein
Speaker 3: of things when it came to just like public perception, right,
Speaker 3: But yeah, so Stephen Greer. He's recruited by Lawrence Rockefeller
Speaker 3: and he becomes the spokesperson for the Disclosure Project, which
Speaker 3: has provided his meal ticket to this very day. Greer
Speaker 3: has given thousands of interviews promoting the narrative that NASA's
Speaker 3: Apollo Lunar projects were stopped in nineteen seventy two merely
Speaker 3: because extraterrestrials, the aliens who have been stationed on the
Speaker 3: Moon for eons, didn't want the truth to leak out,
Speaker 3: but were at least kind enough to let us keep
Speaker 3: the technology they gave us earlier. And Roswell in nineteen
Speaker 3: forty seven. He has such a strange, you know, foundation
Speaker 3: for his perspective on the extraterrestrials. He views them as
Speaker 3: like these heroic saviors, saviors that are going to save
Speaker 3: all of mankind from ourselves, right, which is even more
Speaker 3: the Hegelian dialectic, the Malthusian bias of like we have
Speaker 3: to write the changing images of man. We have to
Speaker 3: convince the public serfs, right, the peasant class, that it
Speaker 3: is humanity itself that is the threat. Right, so therefore
Speaker 3: they will allow these these extraordinary measures to be taken.
Speaker 3: That will, of course you know, compromise your personal and
Speaker 3: individual sovereignty and liberty in every way, and that is
Speaker 3: all Unfortunately, it's the price we must pay, right if
Speaker 3: we're going to come together in this collective. It's really
Speaker 3: just a communist perspective reality. But it's this collectivist mindset,
Speaker 3: this collectivist uh you know, trap that I think has
Speaker 3: been set for far too long, and this just plays
Speaker 3: into it more so than than many other narratives that
Speaker 3: are oversaturating landscape this moment. But so, what I think
Speaker 3: is interesting is that you have the to the Stars Academy,
Speaker 3: which you consider what what was the name of Blink two,
Speaker 3: the dude that was going around but uh yeah, he's
Speaker 3: just clearly some sort of mockingbird operative who might be
Speaker 3: maybe he believes it right, Which that's something else that
Speaker 3: I think is interesting is that you could very much
Speaker 3: almost like it's a more useful asset is someone who
Speaker 3: who almost believes the propaganda themselves, right, And I think
Speaker 3: that that that is always kind of playing into this.
Speaker 3: So it's it's many of these operations are so compartmentalized
Speaker 3: that it would be kind of ridiculous to imagine that
Speaker 3: everyone's read in on the ultimate goal. Set and benchmarks
Speaker 3: and conclusions for this project. And and so the vast majority,
Speaker 3: I would imagine might even be you know, genuine organic believers,
Speaker 3: and within the context of these narratives, and I could
Speaker 3: see that being far more useful in certain contexts, you know.
Speaker 3: And so anyway, the question is, as they you know,
Speaker 3: stage it in this in this article, is that any
Speaker 3: intelligent person should ask this question, of course, which is
Speaker 3: why would a leading figure of the Rockefeller dynasty devote
Speaker 3: the last decades of his life to the cause of
Speaker 3: UFO truth disclosure and transparency. Considering this operation co evolved
Speaker 3: with the growth of alien disclosure projects, it is worth
Speaker 3: questioning are Lawrence Rockefeller's roles as you.
Speaker 5: Sorry, I just while I'm still thinking about it, I
Speaker 5: just I also, like, I mean, obviously I joke around.
Speaker 5: It's like, oh, they can be into UFOs too, or
Speaker 5: they want to know this, or but like all joking aside,
Speaker 5: It's like if these people genuinely we're trying to disclose
Speaker 5: the public or genuinely we're trying to claw information out
Speaker 5: of government's hands or something along those lines. Because they
Speaker 5: didn't know they could go about it in much better ways,
Speaker 5: and a lot easier, like these are the people that
Speaker 5: literally loan money to governments, Like this is the role
Speaker 5: they play, and like these guys are above governments. I
Speaker 5: know they try to sell us, sell it to you.
Speaker 5: So I guess the only way you really can buy
Speaker 5: this narratives, if is if you just buy into a
Speaker 5: normy worldview and that governments.
Speaker 3: You know, are here for the people.
Speaker 5: They are instituted by the people, and everyone answers to
Speaker 5: them or whatever, including these characters like this and so
Speaker 5: like you know, this is just a concern, says, and
Speaker 5: that's lobbying through the proper channel's way to get information out,
Speaker 5: like this is this is the this is the proper
Speaker 5: this is the system, and this is you know, what
Speaker 5: all people have to go through. And if anything, is
Speaker 5: just a testament to how it's the same for the
Speaker 5: poor and rich. But that's just retarded and like we
Speaker 5: know these people fucking literally like you know, they can
Speaker 5: fucking change agendas for countries. Like the idea that these
Speaker 5: guys couldn't just get the information on their own and
Speaker 5: find ways to divulge it in in an orderly manner
Speaker 5: or just all at once, you know, or whatever, and
Speaker 5: that they would need to go through this sort of
Speaker 5: like project where they have this whole like you know,
Speaker 5: roll out with this guy Steven Greer and like this
Speaker 5: whole like it just doesn't This isn't how it would
Speaker 5: it would manifest itself if they were genuine in there
Speaker 5: in their supposed interests, you know what I mean, Right, Yeah,
Speaker 5: this isn't how it would play out on.
Speaker 3: N Yeah, we're we're supposed to accept this as honest transparency,
Speaker 3: government accountability. That's another hilarious aspect of the narrative. It's like, oh,
Speaker 3: they're finally disclosing to the public, providing actual accountability. And
Speaker 3: this is I can't imagine in the in the the
Speaker 3: mindset of just you know, the average person buying into
Speaker 3: the idea that, oh, my god, we're getting actual transparency
Speaker 3: from the state. You know, it's just a laughing you know,
Speaker 3: it's a laughable concept. But it makes me think of
Speaker 3: of you know, one of the other things that was
Speaker 3: in I can't remember. It must have been in part
Speaker 3: two of this series of articles or something, but I
Speaker 3: had found it to be like one of the worthwhile
Speaker 3: extraordinary things too, that was you know, resonating with me,
Speaker 3: and definitely I took away from the article. But it
Speaker 3: was the fact that this doctor Leon Davidson, who's a
Speaker 3: leading chemical engineer that worked on the Manhattan Project, which
Speaker 3: anyone who was working on the Manhattan Project, I mean
Speaker 3: Illuminati confirmed my friend. Like, there's no way around it.
Speaker 3: You know, you were entirely compromised if you were even
Speaker 3: in proximity uh to the Manhattan Project, and if you weren't,
Speaker 3: you were being you know, it's like they had full
Speaker 3: control of those assets. That's all I'm saying. Right, even
Speaker 3: with Oppenheimer, there's all this. When I did the Oppenheimer episode,
Speaker 3: it was so interesting because they there's there are these
Speaker 3: claims of foreign intelligence influence and and uh, you know,
Speaker 3: as if they had infiltrated domestically in the US, and
Speaker 3: there's this looming communist Soviet threat, and they're always kind
Speaker 3: of trying to provide that as the framework because it's
Speaker 3: kind of this MACARTHYUS you know, uh environment at the time,
Speaker 3: you know, And for for me, that entire sequence of
Speaker 3: events with the Manhattan Project was really just like I
Speaker 3: think that it's a false misconception when you consider that
Speaker 3: the race to a nuclear bomb, right, or the atom bomb, right,
Speaker 3: the race to to the doomsday weapon. I think that
Speaker 3: that was truly just a misconception and that they you know, anyway,
Speaker 3: you'll have to go check out my Oppenheimer episode. I'll
Speaker 3: have to go. Yeah, it's it's very interesting. But so
Speaker 3: the point being is that this leading chemical engineer who
Speaker 3: was on the Manhattan Project became one of the most
Speaker 3: efficient UFO investigators during the Cold War. And in nineteen
Speaker 3: fifty nine he wrote this essay titled CIA plus e
Speaker 3: CM equals UFOs how to cause a Radar siding. That's
Speaker 3: in nineteen fifty nine, and I just think in the
Speaker 3: context of all the you know, Navy pilots, the US
Speaker 3: Air Force, military veterans coming out going on Rogan talking
Speaker 3: about how their radars are being right scrambled. But also
Speaker 3: before beforehand, you know, they would see these just extraordinary
Speaker 3: events taking place on the radar that they perceived as
Speaker 3: a legitimate reality and it wasn't some sort of like
Speaker 3: technological error within the radar systems. And so it was
Speaker 3: just proving out this alleged you know, UAP unidentified aerial
Speaker 3: phenomena threat as far as these advanced technological capabilities that
Speaker 3: were entirely unaware, you know, unacknowledged to the public. And
Speaker 3: this had just consider how old this narrative really is, right,
Speaker 3: because you can tie that all the way back to
Speaker 3: nineteen fifty nine at the least, right. I mean, I'm
Speaker 3: sure there's there's more examples of this, but he says,
Speaker 3: I contend that since nineteen fifty one, the CIA has
Speaker 3: caused or sponsored saucer sidings for its own purposes. By
Speaker 3: shrewd psychological manipulation, a series of normal events has been
Speaker 3: served up so as to appear as quite convincing evidence
Speaker 3: of extraterrestrial UFOs. That's a that's a statement right there,
Speaker 3: you know what I mean, like and and something that
Speaker 3: I think is perfectly accurate. Unfortunately, when it comes to
Speaker 3: the at the very least the primary sources that these
Speaker 3: narratives are stemming from, we must remain skeptical.
Speaker 5: I mean, come on, hey, you've done a video on
Speaker 5: whether manipulation right or was there my mind mixing you
Speaker 5: up something else?
Speaker 1: Well?
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, I haven't done one. I can tell you
Speaker 5: guys that I haven't yet. I'm doing my first Vegas
Speaker 5: episode come this Thursday.
Speaker 3: So oh yeah, buddy, that'll be awesome. That's one of
Speaker 3: the most interesting stories ever. But yeah, with weather manipulation, yeah,
Speaker 3: I covered it only like in a segment on my
Speaker 3: DARPA episode.
Speaker 5: Yeah yeah, okay, yeah, I'll have to at some point.
Speaker 5: If you guys out there do want me to cover it,
Speaker 5: and if there's a guest out there that you'd liked
Speaker 5: me have, I'm I'm happy to cover it. But I mean,
Speaker 5: I'm not about to be overnight a fucking weather manipulation expert,
Speaker 5: So don't expect a solo episode from me. I mean,
Speaker 5: I could always bring up if you have an article
Speaker 5: you want me to cover, I can always cover on
Speaker 5: like the in the Morning dump or something. But yeah,
Speaker 5: so I don't know if that's something you guys want.
Speaker 3: Let me know that.
Speaker 5: You guys can easily make that happen. Just find me
Speaker 5: the guest and slash or article.
Speaker 3: But I wanted to show you it was John Podesta
Speaker 3: of all people, Yeah, John Podesta, giving a damn. Let
Speaker 3: me let me see. Uh, I know where it's It's
Speaker 3: in here somewhere, but it's super interesting. I don't know
Speaker 3: if it's in this. Yeah here, it is right here. Dude.
Speaker 3: It's not long at all, But listen to this because
Speaker 3: especially considering his direct ties to Pizzagate, right and and
Speaker 3: uh and the seth Rich exposure of the Podesta emails. Basically, this,
Speaker 3: this is so crazy.
Speaker 4: I think it's time to open the books on questions
Speaker 4: that have remained in the dark on the on the
Speaker 4: question of of government investigations of of UFOs. It's time
Speaker 4: to find out what what the truth really is that's
Speaker 4: out there. We ought to do it, really because it's right.
Speaker 4: We ought to do it because the American people quite frankly,
Speaker 4: can handle the truth. And we ought to do it
Speaker 4: because it's the law.
Speaker 3: All right, read that script, John Podesta, and go and
Speaker 3: get your pedophile artwork, my friend, because you're you're a
Speaker 3: sidistic bastard that deserves rotten hell. I'm sorry to say that,
Speaker 3: but it truly is something that I came away from
Speaker 3: the PC eight episode knowing that the Podestin brothers are
Speaker 3: sidistic pedophiles. So I think that you know, unfortunately, when
Speaker 3: when you're aware of the Podesta brothers art work and
Speaker 3: and the various connections not only to Marina Brahmovic, right,
Speaker 3: but I'm talking the darkest uh sadistic abuse networks of
Speaker 3: children you could ever imagine. But anyway, do you have
Speaker 3: what else did you have? Buddy?
Speaker 5: Yeah, I got a I got this sum from rage
Speaker 5: Child that I meant to cover yesterday because it's something
Speaker 5: one of the audience audience anytime audience new tags is
Speaker 5: something I do try to get to it when I
Speaker 5: can at some point unless it's just retarded and I'm like,
Speaker 5: I don't want to cover this at all, But generally speaking,
Speaker 5: nine times out of ten that is not the case
Speaker 5: with you guys content. So just let you guys know
Speaker 5: that is one I do want to bring up, and
Speaker 5: I did want to kind of figure it before we
Speaker 5: got out of here. We give a quick anti war
Speaker 5: update from men I were a calm that they kind
Speaker 5: of got an ax just it literally is is a
Speaker 5: couple of sentences just kind of let them know where,
Speaker 5: you know, whatever the latest update is on the ceasefire
Speaker 5: at that point, just to kind of keep them updated.
Speaker 5: I mean, I know we could also talk about the
Speaker 5: finders came. We are running up at an hour and
Speaker 5: a half, but I so I figure, you know, probably
Speaker 5: this tab I have the TI war that may be
Speaker 5: out of there, unless you do want to back up
Speaker 5: on the I don't feel like the Finder's cult. Stuff
Speaker 5: is going to be quick, because I know we had
Speaker 5: talked about.
Speaker 3: It really isn't very long. If I keep it, if
Speaker 3: I don't go off on any tangents, then it'll be.
Speaker 5: You will this real quick, to his book author Jennifer.
Speaker 5: Jennifer woolf Thall's husband Joseph worked as an engineer for
Speaker 5: Lockheed Martin. They adopted multiple and torturing them to near
Speaker 5: death on a constant basis.
Speaker 3: I got crazy.
Speaker 5: Here's which is the wife is surprisingly kind of cute
Speaker 5: ish almost, but like a lot more normal, kind of
Speaker 5: boring looking face. She's like, all right, she's like a
Speaker 5: solid five or six. You know, she's doing Okay, she's
Speaker 5: doing I don't know what fucking what happened there in
Speaker 5: the right She's fucking we're here for I guess over here.
Speaker 3: Oh man, that is crazy. Mm hmm.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that is a That is an ugly son of
Speaker 5: a bitch.
Speaker 3: And mister Deeds.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, so I just thought it was a he
Speaker 5: wants to mess up Jennifer Wolfall the Arthur of a
Speaker 5: real friend and her husband, Joseph Wolfall, an engineer for
Speaker 5: Lockheed Martin. I mean he must be making money to
Speaker 5: be able to.
Speaker 3: Pull that off.
Speaker 5: Not that she's like super hot or anything, but like
Speaker 5: because he's a fucking mongoloid. She's normal looking ish, you know,
Speaker 5: she's kind of relatively attractive. Pled guilty on January thirteen
Speaker 5: to aggravated child abuse and neglect of a child with
Speaker 5: great bodily harm. According to plea agreements attained by Fox
Speaker 5: News Digital, what's the significance of real friend? I mean,
Speaker 5: is this like one was like gay propaganda bullshit or something?
Speaker 5: Is that why the significance?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, look at the biracial does kind of
Speaker 3: look like it?
Speaker 5: All right, let's read more than A couple allegedly locked
Speaker 5: the children in their rooms for days, for weeks at time,
Speaker 5: with little food and in unhygienic conditions at the home
Speaker 5: of Castlebury, just north of Orlando. One of the children,
Speaker 5: a girl, told deputies she had not interacted with her
Speaker 5: siblings or other adults for years, and that the wolfalls
Speaker 5: would pour cold water and every night. Now this was shared,
Speaker 5: I would assume to us for I'm assuming the reasoning
Speaker 5: being because he's an engineer for Lockheed Martin. Now, I
Speaker 5: will say engineers exist and even in military industrial contractors
Speaker 5: and monsters exist, so like, I don't know, not everything
Speaker 5: is the government's fault. Now, would I be surprised if
Speaker 5: there's a government link here. No, But I wouldn't even
Speaker 5: really go so far as to say anything even implies
Speaker 5: that he just happens to work there. I mean, especially
Speaker 5: in the engineer thing. Nothing about that job title implies
Speaker 5: to me there's something spooky going on. It's an engineer.
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't know it.
Speaker 3: I guess it.
Speaker 5: Depends on what type of engineer. Engineer is pretty vague,
Speaker 5: but uh, I don't know. I mean, I guess maybe
Speaker 5: it's just because I'm a military mechanic or not. I
Speaker 5: am a military mechanic, but I'm an aircraft mechanic. I
Speaker 5: was an aircraft mechanican military, and I.
Speaker 3: Have you know, I know what you know.
Speaker 5: I've had to deal with aircraft engineers, So like, I
Speaker 5: know they exist, and I kind of have an idea
Speaker 5: of what they do, so they don't really feel like
Speaker 5: they're out here doing like spooky stuff on behalf of
Speaker 5: Lockheed Martin, on behalf of the government. You know, I
Speaker 5: think they're just doing aircraft engineer stuff. But I don't know,
Speaker 5: I could be wrong.
Speaker 3: Average Lockheed Engineer.
Speaker 5: He says, right, yeah, so I know, yeah, I mean
Speaker 5: I average, I mean obviously joke there, but like, yeah,
Speaker 5: oh yeah, I did it. I guess I forgot to mention.
Speaker 5: We do have this little video I figured we'd play about,
Speaker 5: like what the fuck this dude. It's a little bit long,
Speaker 5: but it sounds I am I am compelled, I am
Speaker 5: interested because it's a very bizarre. I mean, so are
Speaker 5: you want to play it?
Speaker 3: I thought it was that bad. Thank you, I said, homeboy,
Speaker 3: says Josean town Antonio Burios Junior. Hopefully I pronounced that right.
Speaker 3: I will be both your ability to talk about this
Speaker 3: stuff in a way that makes it difficult to paint
Speaker 3: people as crazy conspiracy theorists.
Speaker 5: Okay, well I don't know what kind of people you're
Speaker 5: interacting with, but I appreciate.
Speaker 3: Thank you, man.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I'm so sorry. I'm looking through did one to
Speaker 5: buy the right Sequarro? Did one of Potesta's bros Buy
Speaker 5: the right Sequrol House? Informant story and say, yes, you
Speaker 5: are correct. I don't know the specifics on what exactly
Speaker 5: they bought, like if it's some sort of specific you know,
Speaker 5: I don't. I don't think it was the Podesta's, but
Speaker 5: it was one of their friends.
Speaker 9: It was like, a.
Speaker 5: Who are the fucking English people that they're kind of
Speaker 5: associated with? There's some like English people know it's one
Speaker 5: of his brothers. I forget his name. I'll think of
Speaker 5: it later, but there is It is like some sort
Speaker 5: of Clinton connected individual that most of you guys will
Speaker 5: probably know once you hear the name. And it was
Speaker 5: like their brother or something, Tony Blair maybe no, maybe
Speaker 5: I don't know Tony Blair's brother. I don't know somebody
Speaker 5: who's like kind.
Speaker 3: Of linked up with Huh, that would make sense Tony
Speaker 3: Blair's brother.
Speaker 5: Yeah, but I don't know either way. I can't remember
Speaker 5: it is. It is somebody somebody important bought it, sat
Speaker 5: on it, and uh yeah, I don't know what specifically,
Speaker 5: if it was like film rights or what I remember.
Speaker 5: I'm talking about it like this sounds like one of
Speaker 5: those things you thought was really slick back in the day,
Speaker 5: because you're like cool, Now no one's will do this,
Speaker 5: and now films aren't even that big of a thing. Yeah,
Speaker 5: the story could get out else in other ways because
Speaker 5: they're like, hell, yeah, we have the most prominent way
Speaker 5: a story can get out on lock right, Okay, dude,
Speaker 5: no one gets a fuck anymore. But yeah, all right,
Speaker 5: let's let's play this video because we are running a
Speaker 5: little bit late. I mean I figured then after that
Speaker 5: week and then just kind of do maybe to a
Speaker 5: quick anti war update, what's going on with that? But
Speaker 5: let's play. This is three minutes long. It is long,
Speaker 5: but like I don't know, this dude is fucking weird.
Speaker 5: I'm down and I am very drown in. I am
Speaker 5: locked in on this fucking weirdo.
Speaker 9: Experiences I've ever had in my life I'm about to
Speaker 9: share with you, so bear with me. So as I
Speaker 9: get closer to this pick site, I start feeling odd,
Speaker 9: I start feeling extremely emotional.
Speaker 5: Probably need to make sure to stop and give commentary
Speaker 5: every now and then because this is on news Nation.
Speaker 5: So just know, I ever like twenty seconds or not,
Speaker 5: we should make even to say something as simple as hey, poop,
Speaker 5: just press play again. And the closer I get, the
Speaker 5: more these people will take us down and hardars.
Speaker 9: To overwhelm me. I feel this intense hybrid of sadness
Speaker 9: and happiness and beauty and song, and it was in.
Speaker 5: Good things and none of the bad and all the
Speaker 5: nice things in the world because I'm just scrabing. So
Speaker 5: it was taken down at the time.
Speaker 3: To operate culture.
Speaker 9: At night, and I began wondering what was wrong with me?
Speaker 9: It was late and like, am I distressed? Am I tired?
Speaker 9: And I don't know. But as I came over this
Speaker 9: object for the pick, it was this overwhelming sense of emotion.
Speaker 9: Is it your feeling? Are you having an intel breakdown
Speaker 9: on this?
Speaker 3: This is hypnotist?
Speaker 5: Yeah right, And I will say this makes him seem
Speaker 5: a little less booked up. Those eyes, man, those eyes,
Speaker 5: I don't know if they're just deceptively adding this to
Speaker 5: or it does not look zong to the fuck out.
Speaker 9: But I felt like something connected with me. I felt
Speaker 9: like something had tuned.
Speaker 3: In to me and my soul and was yeah, he's possessed.
Speaker 9: Some sense.
Speaker 5: I mean, this is how he's describing coming not even
Speaker 5: doing anything with you, but it's like it's coming across
Speaker 5: getting ready to work on the egg or whatever. I
Speaker 5: guess because I believe he probably played some part in
Speaker 5: extracting or recovering or whatever. Yeah, he pulled the dust out,
Speaker 5: he cut up the handkerchief that was used to.
Speaker 9: Hold the egg, and how profound what I was doing was.
Speaker 5: And how profound I was, And I just want to
Speaker 5: see like a cutaway of him with a stick and
Speaker 5: an egg for real, dude.
Speaker 3: It's so funny.
Speaker 9: It's so overwhelming that I began to cry, and then
Speaker 9: I'm confused as to why I'm crying at the same time.
Speaker 9: And then I'm do I abort the mission?
Speaker 5: Why do I cry? Angle angles below my when doing this.
Speaker 9: Type of work? And I got the load hooked up
Speaker 9: and I began flying away, and once it was just
Speaker 9: me and that object in between the pick and the
Speaker 9: drop side, there was about twenty miles in between. I
Speaker 9: felt like something was inside of me. I felt like
Speaker 9: I was possessed by the most beautiful spirit I've ever
Speaker 9: been becausess by. And it was loving.
Speaker 3: This is weird, man, very weird.
Speaker 9: But there was a sense of sadness at the same time.
Speaker 9: And had you ever had an.
Speaker 6: Experience like this before? No?
Speaker 3: Huh, weird. It feels like a movie, dude, you know
Speaker 3: what I mean? Like it just feels like the most
Speaker 3: staged interview you could ever imagine. Just I get it. Okay,
Speaker 3: maybe this is post production editing or some ship I mean,
Speaker 3: but I'm just.
Speaker 5: Down in there to make it like kind of pop.
Speaker 3: You're like, whoa, yeah, but man, it just kills me
Speaker 3: to watch hear that.
Speaker 5: Listen, feminine energy that backgrounds, then that's that's added for
Speaker 5: emotional effect, right exactly. It's wild. No, that does kind
Speaker 5: of suck in a little bit, doesn't it.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: And but like I don't know from from like being
Speaker 5: a kind of cynical, it just does feel like they're
Speaker 5: kind of seating all angles. Like to give credit to
Speaker 5: my nefil and desquad homies, it's like they're leaving that
Speaker 5: angle open. Oh, you're leaving that angle open. They're also
Speaker 5: like kind of pick your own story thing, so you
Speaker 5: can go that angle if you want. Still still leaving
Speaker 5: that branch open. So they haven't completely cut off those
Speaker 5: people or created a divide within this movement yet.
Speaker 3: Between the two entities, whoever's wanting to embrace which narrative?
Speaker 3: You know, the grounds is now fertile, right, I mean
Speaker 3: now you could look it the other way.
Speaker 5: You could say, oh cool, and oh there's some sort
Speaker 5: of other technology here or something. I don't know. Yeah,
Speaker 5: we have forty five seconds.
Speaker 9: Let's let's tell you that it felt like, felt like
Speaker 9: the spirit of God, but not in any masculine sense.
Speaker 9: And it wasn't like a soul. It was like a
Speaker 9: frequency that I was connected with and whatever that force rate.
Speaker 9: Since that night, it has stayed with me. And as
Speaker 9: crazy as it sounds, it's what's guiding me now and
Speaker 9: it's what's providing protection for me. Weird, It's changed your life,
Speaker 9: It's changed my life.
Speaker 3: It gave you an alternative identity, my friend, You're living
Speaker 3: for the mind control of God. Now that it is
Speaker 3: very strange to say frequency. That term in itself is
Speaker 3: like I get it. It's it's a very you know,
Speaker 3: frequently used term. But still the level of you know,
Speaker 3: of capability that as far as the EMF aspect of
Speaker 3: mind can control, just off of Robert Duncan's perspective in
Speaker 3: regard to James Holmes makes sense to me, especially considering
Speaker 3: modern techniques of mind control. So yeah, I don't know, man,
Speaker 3: Like I saw somebody earlier say that all the all
Speaker 3: the pilots who are whistleblowers have basically been caught up
Speaker 3: in the mind control operations. So I could see some
Speaker 3: sort of like these are you know, these are the
Speaker 3: the assets, right, that within the operation that have been activated,
Speaker 3: that are now in probably providing the public with these
Speaker 3: false misconceptions and and so that would make sense, but
Speaker 3: it could just be it's a.
Speaker 5: Weird little Freudian slip JB. Pointing out the most beautiful
Speaker 5: spirit I've ever been possessed by, which is a weird
Speaker 5: thing to say. Yeah, I mean, which, to be fair
Speaker 5: in a positive way, you could just said it weird,
Speaker 5: like spoke wrong, you know, but like still it doesn't
Speaker 5: imply you've been possessed by other spirits.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, absolutely, But that is just such a strange
Speaker 3: way to even you know, frame that experience, because possession
Speaker 3: is like ritualistic in occult, you know, like in more
Speaker 3: ways than one. So it's uh, yeah, Freudian slip makes
Speaker 3: a lot more sense. It seems like a slip of
Speaker 3: the tongue. Like but I don't know, they're constantly trying
Speaker 3: to they know what they know what critical thinkers believe
Speaker 3: about some of these you know, alternative theories, and so
Speaker 3: I'm always very concerned that they're trying to you know,
Speaker 3: kind of cloud our like flood the landscape and and
Speaker 3: make it very difficult for us to discern, for ourselves
Speaker 3: and assess these these claims and their credibility, because again,
Speaker 3: I just feel like that is dealing in deception, the
Speaker 3: limited hangouts, right, that that in itself is just constantly, uh,
Speaker 3: you know, within the framework of these these clandestine operators.
Speaker 3: So I don't know, I'm very concerned now more than
Speaker 3: ever when it comes to especially their understanding of how
Speaker 3: to manipulate the alternative media landscape. Because you were saying that,
Speaker 3: I mean ship Man, Sarah Adams, Sean Ryan, She's not
Speaker 3: even good at it. She's terrible. It is, She's a
Speaker 3: blessing for people like us. But yeah, who knows how
Speaker 3: many of their operators are are man When you're in
Speaker 3: that line of business, I don't know how much you
Speaker 3: can critically think for yourself like that has to be
Speaker 3: because you have to be you know, a very I
Speaker 3: would say, you know, you clearly have to just be
Speaker 3: the that doesn't even consider asking questions right when it
Speaker 3: comes to to these specifically these covert operations. But yeah,
Speaker 3: I don't know, it's that I don't know how we
Speaker 3: don't like as far as just the individual operators, like
Speaker 3: what are they dealing with? Because many of them are
Speaker 3: very unimpressive.
Speaker 5: So yeah, Gez all right, let's let's finish up. Dude,
Speaker 5: We're already an hour forty. I did want to give
Speaker 5: make sure today to give an update on what's going on.
Speaker 5: So this is all we got right here from Algazier.
Speaker 5: It's just the most recent updates. We just got like
Speaker 5: a few little bullet points. Israel hamasies fire and Gaza
Speaker 5: takes hold prisoners to be free to be freed, so
Speaker 5: ninety I think I saw something too about some already
Speaker 5: being freed too. That's not on here. I saw like
Speaker 5: a tweet earlier scrolling through, But I just want to
Speaker 5: anti word dot com. This is the most up to date,
Speaker 5: I believe official stuff. Ninety Palestinians Palestinians held in Israeli
Speaker 5: prisoners are due to be freed after the release of
Speaker 5: three Israelly captives held in Gaza under a ceasefire deal
Speaker 5: between Hamas and Israel. So that's supposed to be happening today.
Speaker 5: There's supposed to be three hostages released and then ninety
Speaker 5: Palestinians released by Israel, and then the ceasefire began at
Speaker 5: a nine to fifteen GMT, which I don't know what
Speaker 5: that is to now. I'm actually looking it up right
Speaker 5: now to est that would be four fifteen am, So
Speaker 5: this was eight hours ago, in the middle of the night.
Speaker 5: This happened when it started, so after a nearly three
Speaker 5: hour delay during which Israel attacks killed at least nineteen Palestinians. Well,
Speaker 5: that's awful. It was supposed to start at one in
Speaker 5: the morning, but they just they fucking killed twenty more
Speaker 5: Palestinians and dragged their feet and then finally fucking did it.
Speaker 5: So I don't know, we'll see how this goes. Thousands
Speaker 5: displaced Palestinians, meanwhile, have been returning to what remains of
Speaker 5: their homes in various areas of Gaza. This is I
Speaker 5: really feel like, as I've been saying throughout this whole
Speaker 5: ceasefire stuff. I know we're seeing all these stuff about
Speaker 5: the attacks picking back up, but I think this break
Speaker 5: is going to be significant in a lot of ways.
Speaker 5: For one, it will be great just to finally for
Speaker 5: the AID to start rolling in for these people, because
Speaker 5: literally within the past like months, that's been single digits,
Speaker 5: like I think less than five AID trucks that I've
Speaker 5: been through, so they now we're talking about hundreds, So
Speaker 5: it's gonna be huge for these people. But also on
Speaker 5: the uh, I think just a stop. Well, you know,
Speaker 5: this is what made me think of it is the
Speaker 5: returning to their homes. I think, is what now we're
Speaker 5: really started going to be start being able to see
Speaker 5: the devastation settle in, and so I think that's big.
Speaker 5: So I think this break A lot of people are
Speaker 5: talking about how net Yahu and Israels already talking about
Speaker 5: picking up hostilities after this first phase. I think just
Speaker 5: allowing inertia to settle in, to you know, come to
Speaker 5: a stop, and then also just kind of really taking
Speaker 5: account of what actually happened will really may be able
Speaker 5: to shake things up and possibly prevent that from happening.
Speaker 5: So I'm a little bit hopeful. But at the same time,
Speaker 5: it's gonna be super bittersweet because I think a lot
Speaker 5: of people are just gonna start dawning on them the
Speaker 5: extent to which things really were that bad, Because it
Speaker 5: really was throughout this it was like, oh, here you go.
Speaker 5: You have Zionist account of this and then you have
Speaker 5: Palestinian account of this, and they were kind of mixed,
Speaker 5: and so people would kind of choose your own fantasy
Speaker 5: as you went or would forget certain facts. But it's like,
Speaker 5: I mean, most of the stuff I've seen that I
Speaker 5: tend to believe is if anything, things were undercounted. So
Speaker 5: I think people are really going to really it.
Speaker 3: Can be a lot of people.
Speaker 5: Maybe it would be some cogniti dissonance, maybe some people
Speaker 5: just really kind of like changing stances here soon. I
Speaker 5: don't know, I think people really, I don't know, really
Speaker 5: there's a solid chance this really does settle in of
Speaker 5: like holy fuck, you know what I mean. So, and
Speaker 5: I'm hoping that it does as bad as it I mean,
Speaker 5: I guess in a certain sense, I'm kind of hoping
Speaker 5: that maybe I'm wrong, and then maybe it's really.
Speaker 3: Not that bad.
Speaker 5: I mean, obviously even by official reports, though even the
Speaker 5: most official, even though is really friendly reports, it's still
Speaker 5: fucking bad.
Speaker 3: So yeah, yeah, I'm you know, I don't know how
Speaker 3: optimistic I am, because I know that Trump is the
Speaker 3: ultimate Zionist unfortunately, and and his Zionist policies were abhorrent
Speaker 3: in his first administration, And I really see, I don't
Speaker 3: see much of any sort of change in my mind
Speaker 3: as far as in the near future when it comes
Speaker 3: to our Israeli policy. But I will say that, you know,
Speaker 3: it is important to always acknowledge when something positive takes
Speaker 3: place in these conflicts that are so devastating and tragic
Speaker 3: and uh, but you know when you have you know,
Speaker 3: when you have a like Idamir beIN Idamir Ben Gavir,
Speaker 3: the the Israeli security national security Minister, and people like
Speaker 3: everyone in the locut basically all claiming that that this
Speaker 3: ceasefire deal in Gaza will only allow Israel to return
Speaker 3: to fighting under an American guarantee. You know, it's like
Speaker 3: that makes sense to me, you know, a lot more
Speaker 3: when it comes to maybe also the transitionary period and
Speaker 3: attempting to hang this all on Trump's neck, around Trump's
Speaker 3: neck within the new administration, because now they're starting to
Speaker 3: acknowledge publicly, with allegedly Israeli whistleblowers from the military coming
Speaker 3: out saying they refuse to continue to be a part
Speaker 3: of this because they had been knowingly targeting children and
Speaker 3: innocent civilians for all of this time and and right,
Speaker 3: and now it's being publicly acknowledged by mainstream media very
Speaker 3: conveniently in the in the period of time where there's
Speaker 3: this you know, transitionary period taking place with the winds
Speaker 3: of change, and you know, uh in Washington, d C.
Speaker 3: And so it's kind of like one administration attempting to
Speaker 3: crucify the next with right there with the same exact
Speaker 3: policy positions that the next administration will will assuredly continue,
Speaker 3: right because if you notice, it's kind of hilarious to
Speaker 3: compare the differences in policy when it turns out most
Speaker 3: of these presidential administrations very much mirror each other in
Speaker 3: more ways than one, and it's very very limited examples
Speaker 3: of when there is some sort of distinction between them,
Speaker 3: you know. So yeah, especially if you noticed I had
Speaker 3: brought up the other day, I think the last live
Speaker 3: stream that I did that that extremists Israeli settler leaders
Speaker 3: were invited as special guests to Trump inauguration. It's just like, man,
Speaker 3: this is a sign that that I mean, by the way,
Speaker 3: who who moved the embassy? You know, who's who's fulfilling
Speaker 3: the prophecy.
Speaker 5: I mean, you know what, Ego will go a long way,
Speaker 5: and he wants to look like the great deal maker
Speaker 5: the Great War. And I know there's been all these
Speaker 5: reports that he's given you have a complete green light
Speaker 5: just like end with full American backing as soon as
Speaker 5: phase one's over. But still, like I think just this
Speaker 5: break may change things. So and I think they're hubrious
Speaker 5: and ego may get the best of him. And because
Speaker 5: there they just think that, like, oh well, Bill, pause
Speaker 5: and just pick back up maybe to some extent that
Speaker 5: they're wrong and because of their desires to you know,
Speaker 5: have some sort of because this works for both. I
Speaker 5: talked about some of my show yesterday just kind of
Speaker 5: like the idea that they're both incentivized. Biden is to
Speaker 5: kind of salvage what little bit of this he can
Speaker 5: since it's already been put into into motion by Tromp essentially,
Speaker 5: so now he's already there's it looks bad for him
Speaker 5: to fight it, for one, and so it's better for
Speaker 5: him just to go with it that way and go,
Speaker 5: look what the Look what my campaign did that hopefully
Speaker 5: history may look at him somewhat fairly. Now he can
Speaker 5: be looked at the as the president that brought the
Speaker 5: the Gauza conflict to an end that ended Afghanistan. Obviously
Speaker 5: we me and you both can poke holes in that,
Speaker 5: but it's like, you know, just from a basic historical worldview,
Speaker 5: kind of accurate. So it's like whatever he gets to,
Speaker 5: you know, gets to take that. Meanwhile, and then we
Speaker 5: have Trump wants to come in looking great.
Speaker 3: So you just spurred a thought in my mind. This
Speaker 3: could be the transitionary pivot from Gaza to Iran. I mean,
Speaker 3: why the funds. Wouldn't it be right? I know that
Speaker 3: that's a terrible uh you know that's.
Speaker 5: Clearly not that would work better for them. Yeah, you're
Speaker 5: not wrong.
Speaker 3: Missing here. Yeah, yeah, that's although I don't know.
Speaker 5: I don't know if Trump wants to go full on Iran,
Speaker 5: especially off the bat here, that would be I mean
Speaker 5: maybe mid mid administration or something. Maybe they can build
Speaker 5: towards it. But this might be the start of the
Speaker 5: overt that.
Speaker 3: The overts, the overt threats of a preemptive strike though
Speaker 3: on Iran, and they Sarah.
Speaker 5: Ryan or what the fuck her name is, gets her
Speaker 5: freaking bullshit there you go, you know, gods, then you
Speaker 5: can get both Gaza can be over all that over
Speaker 5: at that point, and then they can go, hey, this
Speaker 5: is bigger than the mass. Now even you go bigger.
Speaker 5: This is this is when you go straight to the source,
Speaker 5: when you go Iran. Yeah, I could see that. But
Speaker 5: hey man, we're almost a two hours. Let's get the
Speaker 5: fuck out of here, dude. But and we've kind of
Speaker 5: covered everything we really need to. Anyways, I will let
Speaker 5: you know. I didn't tell you this yet, but I'll
Speaker 5: let the audience know. I don't know if you're able
Speaker 5: to do it tomorrow. But I don't think I'm gonna
Speaker 5: swing more dump unless we do some sort of weird
Speaker 5: time change. I just have kids, got stuff going on
Speaker 5: that day. I mean I have I'm actually off tomorrow,
Speaker 5: so it's kind of I wish I was. I might,
Speaker 5: I wish I could because it's annoying, but whatever, I
Speaker 5: don't think it would be tomorrow.
Speaker 3: So if you're able to do it tomorrow, and do
Speaker 3: it tomorrow because with the vacation coming up, you know,
Speaker 3: I'm gonna have to pick my mom up from the
Speaker 3: airport and stuff tomorrow and and and so, but I
Speaker 3: don't have to do that till like late, like around,
Speaker 3: so I'll do it tomorrow morning, and then on Tuesday
Speaker 3: I'll probably just do already dead, you know, so.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, I should be well, actually, no Tuesday. I
Speaker 5: think I'm working Tuesdays, so maybe there just won't be
Speaker 5: a morning dump that day, but I don't know. We'll
Speaker 5: get there.
Speaker 1: Guys.
Speaker 5: If you don't like it, give us more money. I'm
Speaker 5: gonna tell you, Yeah, you keep giving us more money,
Speaker 5: we'll get to the point where, yeah, you're getting your
Speaker 5: morning dumps every single I don't tell you aside from
Speaker 5: something crazy, but whatever, we're out of here, dude. I
Speaker 5: leve you'll know where they can find you, and we'll.
Speaker 3: Get out of here, dude. All right, brother, Yeah, you
Speaker 3: guys just follow me at the Underclass Podcast. Definitely subscribe
Speaker 3: to the YouTube, to the Rumble and also to the
Speaker 3: Patreon has new tiers available as well. I'll try and
Speaker 3: continually again consistently add some more incentives and I have
Speaker 3: a few other ideas that I'll try and implement here
Speaker 3: shortly and then bust sprout as well as another good
Speaker 3: place to support me. But yeah, other than that, I
Speaker 3: appreciate you all as always. Man, catch me tomorrow because
Speaker 3: I'll definitely probably do the Morning Up tomorrow, so we'll
Speaker 3: cover a few more things. And other than that, I'll
Speaker 3: see you on Tuesday for already dead.
Speaker 5: Hell yeah, and if you guys do want to suppor us,
Speaker 5: I do want to remind you guys that Austin over
Speaker 5: on his YouTube is monetized, so you can give him
Speaker 5: super chats on his YouTube when he's streaming, when he's
Speaker 5: around on my rumble you can be rumble rants. I
Speaker 5: am demonetized on YouTube because I'm a naughty boy. But
Speaker 5: if you do want to support me else elsewhere, like say,
Speaker 5: especially like a regular type thing like monthly, you can
Speaker 5: do the Patreon dot com SLA's no Way Hose twenty twenty.
Speaker 5: This is actually we're gonna get someone's perks too. I mean,
Speaker 5: if you do a rumble rant or a super chat,
Speaker 5: you're get the perk of us re in your chat.
Speaker 5: But like I don't know, you'll get a little bit
Speaker 5: more out of this. So this is Patroon dot com
Speaker 5: SA's no Way Hose twenty twenty, the lowest levels two
Speaker 5: bucks that gives you early access to the episodes, Like
Speaker 5: for example, this Thursday, I'm gonna be doing a the
Speaker 5: Vegas Shooting episode and that won't come out for about
Speaker 5: a week after that, so if you want.
Speaker 3: To get it early access.
Speaker 5: I also have a Rome episode with Jeremy Slate that's
Speaker 5: in there right now, if you want to get access
Speaker 5: to it. Also on Tuesdays at nine thirty I do
Speaker 5: Already Dead at nine thirty pm Eastern, I do Already
Speaker 5: Dead with Austin And if you want to be a
Speaker 5: talking head on that show, you can do that there
Speaker 5: over at Patreon, you can get the link there. The
Speaker 5: second half of the show we do video call ins,
Speaker 5: and yeah, you can support Austin show as well and
Speaker 5: get that perk too. Also, I have an ad free
Speaker 5: RSS feed Now, there's a link there at the top
Speaker 5: of the Patreon that you can copy and put in
Speaker 5: your podcatcher and you will have an ad free RSS
Speaker 5: feed for no we Jose. So for those who don't
Speaker 5: like the ads that you deal with on the audio
Speaker 5: side of things, that's the way to do it. You'll
Speaker 5: get early for the early stuff and AD free, so
Speaker 5: it's a double win. The highest levels of my sponsors
Speaker 5: read them off every episode of My Coast. I'm targaning
Speaker 5: at Tara Ganging Total, also at Abrogate, ds at z
Speaker 5: O V E R A c K at Underscore Infinite Zal.
Speaker 5: Then I have Tim Tuttle, you follow him at Jolly
Speaker 5: on Cleebold and then Will Bell is the Delicious Blueberry
Speaker 5: Rabbit Eye Wine then a big fan of show tour
Speaker 5: in may then also have at I nw r D
Speaker 5: lover at inWORD lover because we should always learn to
Speaker 5: look a little bit inward and love ourselves and we
Speaker 5: should all be in word lovers. I think the world
Speaker 5: would be a better place with that. Make sure to like, share, subscribe,
Speaker 5: comment all that good stuff. Also make sure if you're
Speaker 5: listening on a podcastcher, this takes no time and helps
Speaker 5: us out a lot. Just go up to the top,
Speaker 5: you know, pick a rating, review whatever, give us a
Speaker 5: five star review whenever your podcatcher is. That helps out
Speaker 5: big time. That's the No Way Jose podcast and also
Speaker 5: Austin has the under Glass podcast that you can find
Speaker 5: that both of those on most podcatchers and and video
Speaker 5: players as well, so go check that out. Make sure
Speaker 5: you like your subscribe, comment all that good stuff. Hit
Speaker 5: that like button, you fucking lazy fox. With that, we're
Speaker 5: out here.
Speaker 3: Bye bye deuces.