Speaker 1: So Carl, you may not be aware of this. Uh,
Speaker 1: I'm not not that smart and uh I just got
Speaker 1: an email this morning from the atfuh rejecting my uh
Speaker 1: my form one because I had uh I had spelled
Speaker 1: my own name incorrectly. So yeah, I honestly, you guys,
Speaker 1: I don't know why you're listening to this.
Speaker 2: I'm a.
Speaker 1: Borderline mentally disabled man with them.
Speaker 2: I'm sure you uh did it like with a lot
Speaker 2: of attention and effort and didn't just go and move
Speaker 2: on to something else. Right.
Speaker 1: Even worse, Philip, I don't need your specific knowledge of
Speaker 1: what we're talking about. Uh. But even worse, I used
Speaker 1: one of those like little handy you know, like calculators,
Speaker 1: like it generates the form for you. Oh yeah, And
Speaker 1: at the end it was like, are you sure this
Speaker 1: is your name?
Speaker 2: It does?
Speaker 1: Really, I was like, oh, what do you know, stupid form.
Speaker 1: I'm a red blooded American man, I know what I want. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So anyway, that's that's kind of on me.
Speaker 2: That's delightful. I love that.
Speaker 1: What have you been up to? Carl?
Speaker 2: I wrote a West Texas cowboy song about a local
Speaker 2: news article in which a diverse set of people were
Speaker 2: engaged in various shenanigans, but it includes a rather mild
Speaker 2: ethnic slur. So I don't know that I should sing
Speaker 2: it here.
Speaker 1: But you know what, I'll trust your judgment on that.
Speaker 1: But uh, here's what we'll get up on one of
Speaker 1: my personal hobby horses. Uh, ipsters are getting into country
Speaker 1: music and ruining it crazy.
Speaker 2: Oh no.
Speaker 1: So I was driving back with my wife from visiting
Speaker 1: family up kind of far in the north, New England,
Speaker 1: and we're driving through this tiny little town in the
Speaker 1: middle of nowhere, main right, literal middle of nowhere, and
Speaker 1: we're at this kind of cooled hotel, you know, that
Speaker 1: kind of straight across bangs. Brooklyn types had bought it,
Speaker 1: you know, turn it into a nice spot, right. So
Speaker 1: we're at the bar there and we're sitting outside. It's summer,
Speaker 1: it's beautiful, and as we walked in, I see the
Speaker 1: kind of you know, obligatory you know, pride flag. The
Speaker 1: you know, this was a little bit extra because right
Speaker 1: underneath it there was a little receptacle like you'd pass
Speaker 1: around at church for plan B. So, you know, very
Speaker 1: socially conscious. But uh, the first song comes up, and
Speaker 1: it's Song of the South by Alabama and they're just
Speaker 1: cycling through all this like seventies outlaw country, which I love,
Speaker 1: you know, I grew up listening to you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, but there's a party that's.
Speaker 1: Just like what do you guys not get it? Like
Speaker 1: when they're talking about New York, who do you think
Speaker 1: they're talking about?
Speaker 2: Do you think they're talking about They're.
Speaker 1: Talking about you or your parents? I guess. But also
Speaker 1: it's like Song in the South is just a Southern
Speaker 1: nationalist ant right, It's basically like have you ever seen
Speaker 1: the album cover?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I just could not square that circle in my mind
Speaker 1: where I'm like, you guys really do not understand what
Speaker 1: you're listening to. And I just want to say I've
Speaker 1: really flip flopped on cultural appropriation. Uh, my culture is
Speaker 1: not your costume, Heather, that's really your name, Fletcher. H
Speaker 1: point is. I find it insufferable, And you see it
Speaker 1: in the rise of this kind of like hicklib country
Speaker 1: music too. The one, the one that people always make
Speaker 1: fun of is you know that that song some guy
Speaker 1: sang on TikTok, Right? You know Grandpa was a liberal
Speaker 1: and he would have kicked your ass. See what we
Speaker 1: do safe Edgy swearing to of course, I like, I
Speaker 1: don't know, man, David Alton Co said the end word
Speaker 1: A lot, a lot, like a lot.
Speaker 2: Like almost as much as a rapper.
Speaker 1: There's a certain crossover, you know, like like I don't
Speaker 1: entirely buy uh you know Thomas Soul's thesis. But uh
Speaker 1: you look at David onm cohen, You're like, eh, okay,
Speaker 1: maybe there's some uh some more crossover here than we
Speaker 1: didicially realized.
Speaker 2: That's one of the only times when I'll grant anything
Speaker 2: to that guy is when when you're doing like outlaw country. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: I can kind of get it.
Speaker 1: Like his uh his bootleg record. I can't remember the
Speaker 1: name of it, but it's like whatever twenty four songs
Speaker 1: is it, David Allen co unrated or uncut? I can't
Speaker 1: remember some one ye yeah something. You cannot play it
Speaker 1: in mixed company. I'll leave in that no, uh. And
Speaker 1: I mean you see that as well with like the
Speaker 1: deliberate kind of top down push to kind of mix
Speaker 1: like country music and hip hop. Right, that's its kind
Speaker 1: of own conversation. But uh yeah, the prugs are taking
Speaker 1: our country music and I'm really not having it, man.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know. It's it's funny when when you're in
Speaker 2: Texas and you're in like south you know, Southwestern Texas,
Speaker 2: West Texas, whatever, and you go into a hipster place
Speaker 2: and they're playing music from that area. You're like, okay,
Speaker 2: I get it, right, Like of course it, you know,
Speaker 2: And yes, the food's a little more precious and the
Speaker 2: menu is a little more precious, but like half the
Speaker 2: time the staff isn't from there, but the owner is,
Speaker 2: and so they're like they're wearing a costume essentially, and
Speaker 2: it really irritates me until I just say, eh, whatever,
Speaker 2: as long as I get to hear Alabama or something
Speaker 2: like that. Right.
Speaker 1: Well, it's one of those things that bothers me because
Speaker 1: like I noticed it first obviously with Carhart, right, and
Speaker 1: every time I wear this beanie because it is freezing
Speaker 1: cold where I am, I always keep like, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: hipster dressing up as a working man. I'm like, dude,
Speaker 1: I got this attractor supply for twenty dollars, like what
Speaker 1: we want to do here? It was a hat on
Speaker 1: a rack. Yeah, somewhat Similarly, the one I really noticed
Speaker 1: was real tree like when and it's kind of out now,
Speaker 1: but for a while that was kind of a like
Speaker 1: a daring thing to wear, like, oh see, I mixed
Speaker 1: the white trash aesthetic with my middle school jeans.
Speaker 2: Middle school kids love real tree, like regular just suburban
Speaker 2: kids love real tree, and it has to be real tree.
Speaker 1: Which is very, very weird to me because like I
Speaker 1: had real tree as a kid, and I wore it
Speaker 1: in the woods to go hunting. Yes, and it was
Speaker 1: like the like not the cheapest, but it's basically like
Speaker 1: Walmart camel right, Like it wasn't some high dollar thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah yeah.
Speaker 1: And you sort of see this cycle over and over again,
Speaker 1: like a while back, it was like Champion, you know,
Speaker 1: it makes like cheap again Walmart like pants and stuff
Speaker 1: like that. But as someone who, as you can probably
Speaker 1: Dell Carl, does not spend an immense amount of time
Speaker 1: dressing himself or paying attention to fashion trends, I just
Speaker 1: find it completely and totally baffling, especially when it sort
Speaker 1: of reaches the things that were twenty years ago considered
Speaker 1: to be like a marker of being like a deeply
Speaker 1: out of touch social pariah.
Speaker 2: Rush Limbaugh, that's funny, No, it's true, and it's always
Speaker 2: in cycles. And my daughter being female is tied into
Speaker 2: the trends, like to the nth degree. And she's very
Speaker 2: she's a very smart kid, she's very sharp. My son
Speaker 2: doesn't give a shit, but my daughter is tied into
Speaker 2: all these things. And I have to have these conversations
Speaker 2: with her on the regular and be like, do you
Speaker 2: know what that is? That means something and you should
Speaker 2: be aware of what it means. And she's like, nobody,
Speaker 2: nobody knows, you know, nobody cares. It's it's just cool.
Speaker 2: I'm like, okay, well, yeah.
Speaker 1: And that's that's a Obviously it's a hard argument to
Speaker 1: make when you're you're sixteen, but that is a that's
Speaker 1: a very bad piece of logic. Yeah, I don't care.
Speaker 1: It's cool, such as being a teenager. Uh, Richard Sledge
Speaker 1: sixty nine in chat, he's nor wooding. I can sense it.
Speaker 1: You you were correct. I'm aggressively balding. I'll really be
Speaker 1: a just a regular tinpool by the end of the year.
Speaker 1: And so that's what this beanie is for. So I
Speaker 1: just have to hide to cover up my shame. And
Speaker 1: you've sussed me out, Richard Sledge. Uh, did you did
Speaker 1: you see the Celtech news?
Speaker 2: Carl Those things are sick as hell, dude.
Speaker 1: They kind of stole it to be perfectly fair, right, yeah,
Speaker 1: like stuff in things does crazy stuff like they were
Speaker 1: the first guys who figured out how to make a
Speaker 1: a PP nineteen b zone clone. Yeah uh and they
Speaker 1: for those who is it, did I get those numbers?
Speaker 2: Right? PP? I'm just yeah, yeah, I'm just saying PP
Speaker 2: because it's funny. Oh oh.
Speaker 1: In addition to being scarcely planned, these only the highest
Speaker 1: brow commons.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah yeah. I mean we're the kind of
Speaker 2: people that mess up before and one by misspelling our
Speaker 2: own names, right yeah, not.
Speaker 1: Even my last name is my first one, which is
Speaker 1: one easier to spell. I've got nothing, Carl, I really
Speaker 1: have no defense. Uh. But basically, for those wondering, keel
Speaker 1: Tech is a firearms manufacturer out of Florida, sort of
Speaker 1: infamous for making just crazy stuff.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: The joke is always that, you know, their boardroom just
Speaker 1: has a little miniaturized train full of cocaine that kind
Speaker 1: of runs around, And they had this really bizarre handgun
Speaker 1: question mark that basically featured the fifty shot kind of
Speaker 1: weird helical Merry Go Round magazine from a P ninety,
Speaker 1: which you know, if you ever played, you know, a
Speaker 1: shooter game, you'll be familiar with stuck it on the
Speaker 1: bottom of a handgun, and I don't know, man just
Speaker 1: made some kind of weird Keltech, but.
Speaker 2: There was like a shell around it. There was this
Speaker 2: like shell. It opened up and that was retarded.
Speaker 1: As is often the case. Yes, and so an aftermarket
Speaker 1: manufacturer figured out how a way to sort of make
Speaker 1: it make sense, right, a kind of reduced the shell
Speaker 1: and put most exclusive most importantly fire control droop from
Speaker 1: an Air fifteen, which allows force reset safeties. Basically, it
Speaker 1: gave you access to totally not full auto, totally not
Speaker 1: a P ninety for like six hundred bucks sold really well.
Speaker 1: Keltech just basically stole it and made it worse. But yeah, man,
Speaker 1: I've got to give it to kill Tech for continuing
Speaker 1: to make the most just baffling, baffling designs ever. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and you know what, at least they're trying to.
Speaker 2: It's sick as hell. I want I'm I'm going to
Speaker 2: get one, and and you know I have a way though,
Speaker 2: is the thing, despite the knowledge that you have, I
Speaker 2: have a way. So yeah, I'm I'm definitely getting one
Speaker 2: of those things. Those are sick a lil Uzi Jacuzzi. Yes,
Speaker 2: you should buy a PR fifty five seven. They're cool.
Speaker 2: They're actually really cool their novel. They're kind of retarded,
Speaker 2: but that's how you get a small grip is by
Speaker 2: using a stripper clip or two stripper clips rather to
Speaker 2: charge the weapon. But those things are actually super cool.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I'll be honest, I appreciate kill tech for
Speaker 1: refusing to do anything the normal way. Uh, it's it's
Speaker 1: interesting if nothing else.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: As far as other news, State of the Union, I
Speaker 1: didn't watch it. That guy whose gimmick is basically getting
Speaker 1: kicked out of the State of the Union. He showed
Speaker 1: back up producing one of the funniest images of President
Speaker 1: Donald Trump ever, where it's him in profile and behind him.
Speaker 1: I think his name is Al Green. I'm not entirely
Speaker 1: sure is carrying a sign. This is a direct quote
Speaker 1: from an elected member of government. Black people are not apes.
Speaker 1: That is pretty funny. I will add for the commentary
Speaker 1: onto that. So that happened really Other than that, I
Speaker 1: don't know if there was anything super notable to come
Speaker 1: from it, just kind of the normal political jockeying. Did
Speaker 1: you pay attention to anything particularly interesting, Carl. I.
Speaker 2: I listened to much of it, and what I will
Speaker 2: say is, you know, Donald Trump has this thing where
Speaker 2: when he's given the microphone, he takes a there comes
Speaker 2: a point where he's leaning on the podium and he's
Speaker 2: just like riffing. He's riffing on his own speech, and
Speaker 2: it just goes on way too long. But what I
Speaker 2: will say is that the the libtards doubled down on
Speaker 2: the lib tards doubled down on we don't care about
Speaker 2: Americans when when essentially prompted to, you know, display otherwise.
Speaker 2: And it and it was really funny and I don't
Speaker 2: know the overall thing, like it's a it's a circus,
Speaker 2: but at the same time, like it's great as seeing
Speaker 2: the leopard skin like adjacent to this man like on
Speaker 2: his shoulder is so appropriate.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so it was. It was pretty typical kind of
Speaker 1: circus stuff. As I said in an episode that shouldn't
Speaker 1: be available for free subscribers, will be up tomorrow. I
Speaker 1: wrote an article in Juneto magazine. Is that how we're
Speaker 1: saying it, Carl? If we got confirmation that that's how
Speaker 1: I would, I guess.
Speaker 2: Yeah, uh so.
Speaker 1: You guys can check that out. I saw editor in
Speaker 1: chief Philip on the ex chat in a while back,
Speaker 1: so you guys should check that out, written with help
Speaker 1: from Carl Doll, my copy editor, and confirmation constantly that
Speaker 1: I have no idea what I'm saying. Yeah, I would
Speaker 1: wish you guys could see the back and forth between
Speaker 1: Carl and I over an article, because it is basically
Speaker 1: me saying I wrote this, I hate it, and then
Speaker 1: Carl's extremely detailed notes on what I what, why I
Speaker 1: hate it so much, so.
Speaker 2: I would discoorde I would disagree with that characterization. I
Speaker 2: usually usually say it's actually good, but here's what you
Speaker 2: need to do to make it particularly good, because you're
Speaker 2: softening here, and you should just just get that fed
Speaker 2: post like line, like as, get that arrow as close
Speaker 2: to the fed posting line as possible. And yeah, that's
Speaker 2: that's my way of approaching these things.
Speaker 1: So well, I appreciate that obviously. I'll link to that
Speaker 1: in the description. You should read it and check it out.
Speaker 1: But Carl, I don't know if you caught this. There
Speaker 1: is a new kind of Twitter discourse going around not
Speaker 1: too long ago, talking specifically about homelessness, right, and I
Speaker 1: think I sent a link to this in the chat,
Speaker 1: but I'll just read it out from kind of performative
Speaker 1: communist Cassie Pritchard. This is quite long. We'll go back
Speaker 1: and forth on this, Carl So quoting.
Speaker 2: Isn't that a tranny?
Speaker 1: Oh? I just thought she was unfortunate.
Speaker 2: Uh, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I just have a screenshot.
Speaker 2: I saw a hint that maybe my assumption is correct,
Speaker 2: but it could have been someone being cheaced. But any
Speaker 2: check here.
Speaker 1: Okay, sorry, we're doing some uh some impromptu uh investigative work. Yes,
Speaker 1: you guys talk so much in this group chat.
Speaker 2: Can find checking checking the package, as it were, which
Speaker 2: is something you should do before you Yes, anyway.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna leave that one there. Uh yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: let me find this original thread. No, but she is
Speaker 1: a supporter of unionized Starbucks workers. Yeah, okay, you take
Speaker 1: what you will from that.
Speaker 2: M all right.
Speaker 1: Anyway back to I would say the point that, let's
Speaker 1: be honest, we don't exactly have an iron clad discipline here. Okay,
Speaker 1: Cassie Pritcher, February twenty second. I see we are once
Speaker 1: again doing quote. Mental illness can obviously make you kill yourself,
Speaker 1: for drown your own baby or things of that nature.
Speaker 1: But I'll definitely can't make you say bad words. That
Speaker 1: your violent cruked soul. That's your violent crux soul. Discuss again,
Speaker 1: So for contact. For those who aren't aware, Uh, they
Speaker 1: invited a Scottish guy with turette to the BAFTA Awards,
Speaker 1: and in addition to other typically inappropriate outbursts, he made
Speaker 1: a comment about several diverse gentlemen accepting rewards.
Speaker 2: Well, he was in a film, a film about him,
Speaker 2: a documentary of like raising awareness of this of this condition,
Speaker 2: and his chief defender is a black man with an
Speaker 2: offensive English accent or a Scottish accent.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, yes, So of course you know the footage
Speaker 1: out of him screaming gamer words, and of course we
Speaker 1: are plunged into the discourse. You know, rational adults could say, Okay,
Speaker 1: maybe it wasn't the best idea to invite him there,
Speaker 1: but it's a guy with turettes, Like it's kind of
Speaker 1: how it works, you know, It's like bringing a pitbull
Speaker 1: into a kindergarten, Like okay, yeah, it's it's still the
Speaker 1: dog's fault or the guy with you know, turettes in
Speaker 1: a very narrow sense, but also guys come on like
Speaker 1: grow up, either don't invite him or just kind of
Speaker 1: expect what's gonna happen. So, of course the usual suspects
Speaker 1: are losing their mind. One might draw a comparison to
Speaker 1: the remarks of mister Green here, but anyway, so that's
Speaker 1: the background context on this. Okay, post two. I think
Speaker 1: technically Turet's is a neurological disorder and not a mental illness.
Speaker 1: But whatever. The last time we did it, it was
Speaker 1: about Kanye and bipolar disorder. The same logic is the same. Fundamentally,
Speaker 1: no one on earth actually believes that conge slash mood
Speaker 1: slash neurological slash addictive disorders can compromise your willpower or
Speaker 1: determine your behavior. No one actually has sympathy for any
Speaker 1: disorder of the brain if it results in outcomes they
Speaker 1: don't like. Okay, that's just not true, Carl, It's fundamentally
Speaker 1: not true.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: You live around more homeless people than I do, yees
Speaker 1: what you appine on this?
Speaker 2: The long and the short of it is that the
Speaker 2: vast majority of the people who are bo reals indigent
Speaker 2: homeless people are junkies who have become mentally ill or
Speaker 2: are making them you know, or are are junkies because
Speaker 2: they're mentally ill. And these are not people who can
Speaker 2: make choices. The saddest thing I think I've ever seen
Speaker 2: was a friend of mine who worked for Union Gospel Mission.
Speaker 2: He essentially had a job that was a charity in
Speaker 2: that he was barely being paid for the amount of
Speaker 2: work that he was doing, but he did it, you know,
Speaker 2: as as a good work for several years. And we
Speaker 2: were on a walk in a city infamous for you know,
Speaker 2: homeless people lying all over the sidewalks and attacking normal people.
Speaker 2: And he said, this is let's watch this. And and
Speaker 2: it was about nine at night and under this welllit
Speaker 2: street section of street and right in the edge of
Speaker 2: Smacktown basically, and we saw all these like literally developmentally
Speaker 2: disabled women in their forties and fifties come together as
Speaker 2: a group and lie down under this light so that
Speaker 2: the police could see them to hopefully deter lunatics from
Speaker 2: raping them. And that is the argument of the homelessness. Well, well,
Speaker 2: they would need to choose to be in these programs.
Speaker 2: These are people who can't take care of themselves. These
Speaker 2: are insane people. These are people with delusions that you
Speaker 2: can't possibly understand, and some of them are the other
Speaker 2: side of the coin is that there's a strong street
Speaker 2: criminal element who are just scum of the earth, and
Speaker 2: they're on the street too because it allows them to
Speaker 2: just victimize people and they get treated like one of
Speaker 2: these poor unfortunates who can't take care of themselves as well.
Speaker 2: So what is the what is the proportion of those people.
Speaker 2: It's hard to say, but it's kind of a spectrum.
Speaker 2: But that's who these people are. You know. There's also
Speaker 2: people that are just you know, useless and can't be
Speaker 2: held to any sort of standard, who are literally not
Speaker 2: drug users. It's strange, but it happens sometimes. And this
Speaker 2: the discourse around this by the libtards is one hundred
Speaker 2: percent wrong. And the amount of projection that is involved
Speaker 2: in this conversation in terms of one projecting themselves and
Speaker 2: their thinking patterns on the street people and to what
Speaker 2: they project onto us. The people who are like this
Speaker 2: is unacceptable is insane. But that's like there, their whole
Speaker 2: narrative is based on these forms of projection, based on
Speaker 2: inaccurate theories of mind for everybody.
Speaker 1: And so you're completely correct there and I think that
Speaker 1: this is a good bit of projection from the left
Speaker 1: towards the right, because obviously, Carl, you and I are
Speaker 1: quite fart of the right, but you know, have sort
Speaker 1: of just Christian sympathy for exactly these homeless unfortunates. But
Speaker 1: the idea that you know, in a kind of like
Speaker 1: civic sense, the love that charity is simply letting someone
Speaker 1: do exactly what they want, it is completely and totally untrue, right,
Speaker 1: the idea that, oh, well, they want to do this,
Speaker 1: so we should facilitate it and not restrict them. It
Speaker 1: is not true at all. Obviously, these people have horrible
Speaker 1: and miserted lives and it would be better for them
Speaker 1: and also for the people around them if they were
Speaker 1: not able to do that. Yes, exactly, it's really not
Speaker 1: that complicated. This is something we understood throughout history that
Speaker 1: you can't simply let someone do whatever they want because
Speaker 1: otherwise they would feel upset.
Speaker 2: And that's what monasteries were partially, you know, and nunneries
Speaker 2: like there was a certain amount of it where that
Speaker 2: was dealing with people who are semi functional but have
Speaker 2: mental illnesses, for example, and it's a charitable work to
Speaker 2: take care of them, and it also makes them not
Speaker 2: a problem for everyone else. And so what happens is
Speaker 2: an awful lot of the older people that you see
Speaker 2: out there are who are, you know, more on the
Speaker 2: innocent side. We could say they're mentally disabled and their
Speaker 2: parents passed away, and so there's nobody to take care
Speaker 2: of them, and so they're on the street and they
Speaker 2: are incapable of making decisions for themselves or doing day
Speaker 2: to day things. They can do very basic things if
Speaker 2: they're being wrangled constantly, but you know, if you make
Speaker 2: it about personal choice, they're screwed because they don't understand consequences.
Speaker 1: No, it is certainly clearly. And you see this if
Speaker 1: you've ever been to kind of a blighted urban center, right,
Speaker 1: you'll see someone who, either due to drugs or just
Speaker 1: kind of you know, genetic issues, effectively is incapable of
Speaker 1: even communicating the yes effectively, just a husk and the
Speaker 1: idea that the morally superior things to let that person
Speaker 1: slowly kill themselves. I disagree, to be perfectly honest. Uh
Speaker 1: carrying on, uh with with Pritchard's comments. The only sympathy
Speaker 1: anyone has for mental illness neurological defects, et cetera, is
Speaker 1: to the extent they go, quote, wow, you had to
Speaker 1: try so much harder than me, the average person, to
Speaker 1: perform in a way that's still acceptable to me. That's
Speaker 1: very noble of you. Look like the framing here isn't
Speaker 1: just you know, I find it irritating or I'm settling
Speaker 1: to be around someone with severe turrets. You know, I
Speaker 1: think that you know, most adults understand that that can
Speaker 1: be disrupt but it's something you sort of have to bear, right,
Speaker 1: they can't really help it. But extending that to you know,
Speaker 1: all the indigen right that these kind of transients is
Speaker 1: completely and totally not true. Like I can think of
Speaker 1: you know, several portions of d C where and to
Speaker 1: be fair, I haven't been here since they you know,
Speaker 1: send in the National Guard. But you simply couldn't go. Yeah,
Speaker 1: was not safe to go as you know, a young,
Speaker 1: relatively fit man, let alone, if you have you know,
Speaker 1: a woman with you, or if you have children with you.
Speaker 1: This is not simply you know, kind of personal judgment.
Speaker 1: This is not simply being like, oh, I don't like stinky,
Speaker 1: gross people. Although that is true, that is secondary to
Speaker 1: a erial security risk. I mean, look, Carl, you and
Speaker 1: I have hung out in Portland before, and you'll be
Speaker 1: aware that there are quite a lot of storefronts that
Speaker 1: are completely smashed out just from time to time. And
Speaker 1: so okay, that isn't just you know, oh I think
Speaker 1: this is grosser on site. It's well, you can't live
Speaker 1: like you would in a normal city if there were
Speaker 1: crazy people either pulling knives on you, lighting up, dying
Speaker 1: on the sidewalk, which is something I've seen before, someone
Speaker 1: expire on my front steps. Like the idea that this
Speaker 1: is simply kind of you know, judgmental care and behavior
Speaker 1: is completely and totally absurd, setting aside the issue of
Speaker 1: what's in these people's best interest, that there is a
Speaker 1: very real negative externality, as the economists would say, to
Speaker 1: this type of.
Speaker 2: Behavior extreme and it destroys, it destroys cities. It the
Speaker 2: a tiny number of bad actors or completely irresponsible actors
Speaker 2: cause catastrophic consequences for everyone else. And to be honest,
Speaker 2: it's interesting that we haven't seen like neighborhoods burned down
Speaker 2: over this stuff, because you see the the encampment fire
Speaker 2: all the time in areas where they're allowed to build
Speaker 2: these little you know settlements.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean carl to that point. Like, there is
Speaker 1: a bridge crossing the river right the main way you
Speaker 1: get in and out of one half of my town
Speaker 1: that has been reparably harmed during the process of restoring
Speaker 1: it over the really most of a decade because some
Speaker 1: guy was living underneath it and his little hobble caught
Speaker 1: on fire and melted a hole in the bridge. Yes, right,
Speaker 1: Like having a you know, multiple ways to exit and
Speaker 1: enter your city is you know, far from simply the
Speaker 1: kind of like country club, you know, stuck up prejudices
Speaker 1: of like quote unquote privileged white women. It's a pretty
Speaker 1: basic part of living in a place. Setting aside in
Speaker 1: anything else.
Speaker 2: Something very important to share. We have confirmation that Steven
Speaker 2: Miller eats bacon.
Speaker 1: Oh, because I was. I was listening to the Holy Post,
Speaker 1: which you should not listen to. It's very bad. It's
Speaker 1: sort of the you know that the bastion of very
Speaker 1: respectable Hi regime evangelicalism. David French is a returning guest
Speaker 1: Phil Fisher of veggie Tails and being a terrible libtard fame.
Speaker 2: It sounds awful.
Speaker 1: Uh, well, I was listening to this one my wife
Speaker 1: showed it to me. It was, to be fair, quite entertaining.
Speaker 1: But they made the argument that Stephen Miller was a
Speaker 1: Christian nationalist, and you know, I, of course, with my
Speaker 1: well developed senses, I was like, ah see, I've caught
Speaker 1: he's not. He is an observant Jew. I might have
Speaker 1: been wrong. So you apparently he eats bacon, So that's
Speaker 1: at least something. I don't pretend to know really anything
Speaker 1: else about him, but I did think that was funny.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's very interesting, and I must admit I
Speaker 2: was trying to scroll to get to the thread that
Speaker 2: you were talking about. Just seized on that.
Speaker 1: Hey, we were breaking news, folks, breaking.
Speaker 2: Breaking news, breaking news.
Speaker 1: By the way, I'm constantly laughing at the thought of
Speaker 1: any time the administration is involved in one of these riots.
Speaker 1: I just imagine Stephen Miller, like worm tongue just over
Speaker 1: Donald's shoulder, just saying, like, ye, Donald, machine gun them.
Speaker 1: Let me take out fourteen thousand protesters. You know, it
Speaker 1: would be funny.
Speaker 2: This This reminds me of my opinion on how we
Speaker 2: need to deal with the homeless issue, which is that
Speaker 2: you have a convoy of vehicles of various types with
Speaker 2: various types of professionals in this convoy. You have the
Speaker 2: Helpy Helperton Brigade who take the people off the street,
Speaker 2: you know, by going to these encampments and they very nicely,
Speaker 2: you know, they check them out and they have the
Speaker 2: medical people. And what you're doing is you're triaging these people.
Speaker 2: You're determining is this person on drugs right now or
Speaker 2: recovering from you know, getting completely obliterated, and what do
Speaker 2: we need to do in terms of their immediate physical health,
Speaker 2: like what what do we need to do to take
Speaker 2: care of this person? And then what bucket do they
Speaker 2: go into? Because they're not all criminals. Some of them
Speaker 2: are people. If you want to see the reality of
Speaker 2: who you're dealing with. There are people who get themselves
Speaker 2: put in jail for the winter so that they're not
Speaker 2: out in the elements, who are with it enough to
Speaker 2: do that, and then they're generally not criminal, right, But
Speaker 2: then there's also hardcore criminals that live among the homeless
Speaker 2: because they are enabled to a great degree getting free
Speaker 2: shit all the time and being able to move and
Speaker 2: flow through these these circles. If you ever read any
Speaker 2: of the stories of the tramps from the early twentieth
Speaker 2: century and the hobo encampments there would be like psychotic
Speaker 2: like rapists and murderers, like gay rapists and whatever it
Speaker 2: floating amongst these people. And so you have to be
Speaker 2: aware of who these are, so you figure you look
Speaker 2: them up, you do your biometrics, You find out who
Speaker 2: these people are, and then you triage them to figure
Speaker 2: out where they go. And then the ones who resist
Speaker 2: you machine gun them and then use flamethrowers on the
Speaker 2: whole site, because if they're irredeemable, you just have to
Speaker 2: get rid of them. And so what this allows you
Speaker 2: to do is to say, these are people who are
Speaker 2: mentally ill and can't take care of themselves, or they're
Speaker 2: mentally disabled and can't take care of themselves, and here's
Speaker 2: people who can clean up, and we can find something
Speaker 2: to do with them that's socially useful. And then you
Speaker 2: have calm places that are that have security and you
Speaker 2: can give them things to do. And you know, some
Speaker 2: people will give names to these kinds of places, and
Speaker 2: you could call it a type of camp if you
Speaker 2: want to. I don't really care. But what we need
Speaker 2: to do is we need to stop having lunatics like
Speaker 2: taking drugs and attacking people and just making life horrible
Speaker 2: because it's always very few people that are doing this,
Speaker 2: and it creates these conditions that just compound the awfulness
Speaker 2: for everybody. And it also enables people who are on
Speaker 2: the borderline who should be you know, scared straight, to
Speaker 2: have a visual example of what happens if they step
Speaker 2: over the line. Like that's all criminal justice has ever been,
Speaker 2: which is like normal people need to be able to
Speaker 2: do normal people things. We will punish people who do
Speaker 2: certain things, but we will also deter future crimes by
Speaker 2: making an example of them. And who cares if it's
Speaker 2: five percent of the population. That's how you come up
Speaker 2: with a really nice place like England is through hundreds
Speaker 2: of years. You just brutally repress people who insist upon
Speaker 2: being a problem.
Speaker 1: Just like to say, the opinions expressed by Carl Doll
Speaker 1: are simply one of a guest on this show, not
Speaker 1: necessarily us at the chance that is, do.
Speaker 2: You want to hear the do you want to hear
Speaker 2: the West Texas cowboy song? That are good?
Speaker 1: It this way? I got to strike not too long ago,
Speaker 1: and I've just now made it to the point where
Speaker 1: YouTube is paying me something. Yeah, so I'd like to
Speaker 1: I like to keep it on for a little bit.
Speaker 2: And another venue, and another venue.
Speaker 1: So returning to this threat, because there's actually some some
Speaker 1: pretty interesting insights. I think she's actually not entirely wrong
Speaker 1: on But if you don't perform in a way acceptable
Speaker 1: to other, sympathy for neurological slash mental illness evaporates instantly.
Speaker 1: To the extent leftists excuse schizophrenic murderers, but not schizophrenic bigots.
Speaker 1: It is because only the latter is felt as a
Speaker 1: social problem we get mad about. I think she's entirely.
Speaker 2: Correct about that, perfectly accurate.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I like I said, honestly, some some stunning, some
Speaker 1: studding self awareness there. We'll see how long it lasts.
Speaker 1: But I mean, this is exactly what you saw with
Speaker 1: the Zarubska situation, right, where again there is at least
Speaker 1: tacit support for a schizophrenic knife murderer, right, I mean
Speaker 1: there are dozens of other cases as well.
Speaker 2: They also love like industrial slaughter of Ukrainians the libtards, Yes,
Speaker 2: very much.
Speaker 1: So here's another kind of point of interesting commentary. Like
Speaker 1: on the left, we she is including herself in this
Speaker 1: fundamentally don't care about crime. It is morally uninteresting to us.
Speaker 1: It's just a thing that happens in the world, like
Speaker 1: the weather. So we are willing to excuse me mentally
Speaker 1: unwell is what she said. Meant to say, rather unwell
Speaker 1: people for theft, violence, et cetera. Again, I think she's
Speaker 1: actually completely correct about this. Crime is not an issue
Speaker 1: that the left cares about, at least the radical left,
Speaker 1: and when they do, it is effectively a proxy for
Speaker 1: punishing their enemies.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: So, for instance, you know, in my home state, they've
Speaker 1: they've brought out a new law which says, you know,
Speaker 1: people under twenty one cannot buy or carry a gun
Speaker 1: unless they are accompanied by an adult legally defined as
Speaker 1: someone over eighteen. And look, why is that there? Is
Speaker 1: that there to actually solve a problem, or is it
Speaker 1: there to harass people they don't like? We understand, right,
Speaker 1: this will not actually solve any crime, because even if
Speaker 1: you can get two guys to surrepetitiously carry guns for
Speaker 1: illegal purposes, well, that law would not be violated as
Speaker 1: long as both of them are over eighteen, or even
Speaker 1: if they're still under twenty one. Ridiculous, But I think
Speaker 1: her broader point about simply not caring about crime is
Speaker 1: plainly and clearly true.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, they they've always been that way too. If
Speaker 2: you're talking about the modern progressive era, if you're talking
Speaker 2: about pre probably nineteen forty, it's actually this, it's the
Speaker 2: post World War two frame, which is that like, black
Speaker 2: crime is wonderful because as they're murdering whitey, regardless of
Speaker 2: who who was saying it on the libtard side. And
Speaker 2: but whereas before progressives were, you know, like, we want
Speaker 2: society to be society to be better, and we want
Speaker 2: to see improvements, so these are ways we can do it.
Speaker 2: So even eugenics, for example, the argument was generally about
Speaker 2: like how severe would you be in terms of applying
Speaker 2: eugenics to to to these people. So it's it's very
Speaker 2: it's it's quite fascinating, but it is distinctly a I mean,
Speaker 2: there's there's exceptions, like if you want to talk about
Speaker 2: communists for example, and there were absolutely communists you know,
Speaker 2: pre World War two, of course, but in terms of
Speaker 2: the level the degree to which they were promoted or mainstreamed,
Speaker 2: and so now, yeah, they don't care about crime at all.
Speaker 2: It's completely mainstream.
Speaker 1: Here's where we see that solid analysis start to fall away. Conversely,
Speaker 1: the right will excuse mentally ill bigots because they don't
Speaker 1: care about bigotry, But a mentally ill person who peece
Speaker 1: on the subway should be locked away forever in their framework. Now,
Speaker 1: I understand that it's not entirely sure what she's referring to.
Speaker 1: She referring to Kanye West and this guy with threats
Speaker 1: at the bapt Is. Do I care about that? Not
Speaker 1: in the slightest. They're famous people, right, it doesn't bother
Speaker 1: me in the slightest. But if there's a you know,
Speaker 1: a schizophrenic white guy yelling racial slurs on the subway,
Speaker 1: I still do care about that. I'm not necessarily morally
Speaker 1: offended by the specific words, but it's causing a problem
Speaker 1: I don't want.
Speaker 2: To be around. Yeah, public nuisances are unacceptable, and I
Speaker 2: think they should be punished severely.
Speaker 1: Right, and so again, I think this is the classic
Speaker 1: symptom of the left winging ability to underst and the
Speaker 1: morality of their opponents. Like look like I might find,
Speaker 1: you know, just because of its shocking nature. You know,
Speaker 1: a homeless guy saying something, or you know, transient yelling
Speaker 1: something unexpected that might be funny like in a flash,
Speaker 1: but that's still like problem, right, I still don't want
Speaker 1: to live in such a place where things happen. This
Speaker 1: is a complete and total projection in my mind.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's like I don't I don't want other
Speaker 2: people to be bothered either. I think it's unacceptable for
Speaker 2: other people to be bothered. But to be a good libtard,
Speaker 2: you have to be like, oh, it's okay that that
Speaker 2: guy is shooting up and dying on the sub you know,
Speaker 2: the subway or the the transit public transit, and bothering
Speaker 2: all these people like aren't aren't you tough? Like why
Speaker 2: are you such a snowflake conservatard? It's it's absolutely hysterical,
Speaker 2: But all it is really is it's a cope that
Speaker 2: like that they've trained themselves with by not caring about
Speaker 2: other people at all or the quality of life of anybody,
Speaker 2: you you instantly are a good person because that means
Speaker 2: that you don't don't care about like black criminals or whatever,
Speaker 2: and and and so to have this severe opinion about
Speaker 2: like a word that these same people use like it's
Speaker 2: their last name, you know, it coming out of the
Speaker 2: mouth of someone else shows how false the whole thing is.
Speaker 2: And and they're they're they use terms like moral panic,
Speaker 2: you know, quite broadly. Uh And and it's to basically
Speaker 2: say I'm one of the good ones, even though they
Speaker 2: are in a moral panic about stuff that literally doesn't
Speaker 2: hurt anybody or cause actual problems, you know, because someone
Speaker 2: privately stated something or an opinion that they don't like.
Speaker 2: So it's okay for them to call you a nazi
Speaker 2: so that they can kill you or get you killed
Speaker 2: by some lunatic for having a political opinion. But you know,
Speaker 2: if Don Quavius or you know, Chuck the lunatic is
Speaker 2: attacking an old lady in the city and killing her
Speaker 2: or raping her, like, it's very low class to have
Speaker 2: an opinion and to think that that shouldn't happen.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, and that's exactly what you see here.
Speaker 1: The rest of this is not like particularly interesting. It's
Speaker 1: kind of more like left wing waffling. But Carl, if
Speaker 1: you had to guess what the the last section of this,
Speaker 1: the last post in the thread, reveals what's your guess.
Speaker 2: I saw like a handful of posts about it, I
Speaker 2: didn't get all the way through it. My guess is
Speaker 2: that it would be something like, I'm really smart. I'm
Speaker 2: smarter than a lot of libtards, but I'm especially smarter
Speaker 2: than the chuds, and I don't really care and I'm
Speaker 2: above it all. But also chuds are bad.
Speaker 1: Good guess, And in some of the sections I skipped over,
Speaker 1: it was that, which isn't that interesting? Okay, so this
Speaker 1: is the last post in right, can't wait? So I
Speaker 1: find it very annoying. But the same way I forgave
Speaker 1: the man who stabbed me and tried to kill me
Speaker 1: while psychic, I am forgiven the people who can't forgive
Speaker 1: them or anyone like him. So anyway, it's literally the
Speaker 1: bicycle meme, right, well.
Speaker 2: The very based ideas.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, imagine how much he enjoyed stabbing her. Right,
Speaker 1: who are we to say that.
Speaker 2: That was in fact? I can look at this ah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean there's another section which is what drew
Speaker 1: me attention to it that it has since been it
Speaker 1: has since been deleted. Rather where she effectively is talking
Speaker 1: about how oh this was all made in response to
Speaker 1: you know, some woman talking about how you know, after
Speaker 1: she had children, her views on this changed, and so
Speaker 1: the threat originally started before it was edited with you know,
Speaker 1: going back over, you know this is why we need
Speaker 1: to abolish the nuclear family. Yes, you know this does
Speaker 1: create quote unquote fascism in some women, and so we
Speaker 1: have to abolish it. Again, absolute lunacy.
Speaker 2: They frequently refer to it as the white woman problem,
Speaker 2: where they're like, you were a libtard and then you
Speaker 2: had children and now you care about society, like why
Speaker 2: are you such a fascist?
Speaker 1: Well, honestly, man, I think that that's basically what politics
Speaker 1: has come down to. Yes, is a very simple question
Speaker 1: of do we have a society or not? And do
Speaker 1: we want it to continue? And so you've seen some
Speaker 1: very odd bedfellows right of people basically saying like, oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know, I would like to have a society. For instance,
Speaker 1: I don't know if you caught Carl. And this this
Speaker 1: carries on to our long term project of following left
Speaker 1: wing left wing violence. Do you see this kid who
Speaker 1: got stomped out by antifoot in France? Yes, yeah, let
Speaker 1: me get his name up, which is it's incredibly funny. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Quentin is his name. He was running security for a
Speaker 1: Swiss feminist group of all things. And you know, as
Speaker 1: you can imagine, these women were disagreeing with the importation
Speaker 1: of people who have a very different view of women
Speaker 1: from the predominant right wing or the predominant Western one
Speaker 1: rather and you know Antifa, right, these these kind of
Speaker 1: uh psychos and losers. Uh basically, I mean they just stomped.
Speaker 2: Him to death. I think it was because Antifa is
Speaker 2: opposed to the perpetuation of society exactly.
Speaker 1: And so in that situation you have this this sort
Speaker 1: of odd mix of kind of uh French nationalists, right,
Speaker 1: a lot of them involved in kind of the will
Speaker 1: to Rise stuff with Swiss feminists against sort of new
Speaker 1: frenchman and also like the Antifa types, there have been
Speaker 1: been more kind of entrances to this weird war of
Speaker 1: will we have a civilization or not? You know, I
Speaker 1: think of figures like uh, like Flesh Simulator, right, a
Speaker 1: popular YouTuber who's you know, self described as kind of
Speaker 1: a you know, it's like a schizo left lefty libertarian,
Speaker 1: and you know, he's basically rapidly approaching the you know
Speaker 1: that isn't right, uh, you know, event horizon because of
Speaker 1: you know, both his opinions that civilization should exist and
Speaker 1: also his interactions with people who disagree with him.
Speaker 2: I was listening.
Speaker 1: It's actually quite a funny podcast, uh, just while I
Speaker 1: was doing some chores earlier today where he was was
Speaker 1: speaking about uh, maile theft, right, and it's somewhat hyper
Speaker 1: polic right. He basically talks about how, you know, male
Speaker 1: theft should be published by you know, public execution, right there,
Speaker 1: the kind of things that the Japanese were getting up
Speaker 1: to in that one. In that one, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: research car he can't send me that live. Sorry, horrible podcasting,
Speaker 1: but very funny.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: And you know, embroiled himself in a massive fight with
Speaker 1: these anarchist types, because it's this kind of generalized critique, right,
Speaker 1: I don't like X y Z fact, so therefore burned
Speaker 1: civilization to the ground. And look, Carl, you or I
Speaker 1: are not conservatives, right, we were not these kind of
Speaker 1: Burkian types to understand that there is a need for
Speaker 1: dramatic change. But that is within the sort of shared
Speaker 1: premise of thinking civilization should exist, right, of realizing that
Speaker 1: you know, institutions like the post office, which is, you know,
Speaker 1: not the kind of coolest thing in the world, but
Speaker 1: that is a civilized system. Right, The idea that you
Speaker 1: can you know, drop a package in the mail and
Speaker 1: you know, days, if not weeks later, someone will get
Speaker 1: that package without it being disturbed or stolen. Right now, obviously,
Speaker 1: you know, as things continue to get worse, these kind
Speaker 1: of high trust systems are crumbling, right, That's sort of
Speaker 1: a fact of it. But point is right again, you
Speaker 1: have someone who is a you know, kind of schizo
Speaker 1: lefty conspiracy theorist, just sort of linking up in arms
Speaker 1: with a guys and Swiss feminists and many others. Right,
Speaker 1: And look like, I'm not saying I agree with him
Speaker 1: on everything, or I would like to live in his
Speaker 1: version of the country, but to say that really is
Speaker 1: fundamentally the question in hand do we have a civilization
Speaker 1: or not? And somewhat secondarily, now fifty minutes into this podcast,
Speaker 1: what is the point of that civilization? As of yet,
Speaker 1: we have not started a fight with Iran, but it
Speaker 1: seems as if it is in the offing a cybar issue.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you guys have been following, I
Speaker 1: think it's the USS. Gerald Ford has had disastrous plumbing issues.
Speaker 1: That's kind of funny, but nonetheless, right, roughly the same
Speaker 1: time this is building up, Coucker Carlson had an interview
Speaker 1: with Mike Huckabee and I won't play it. It contains
Speaker 1: copyrighted music. But if you're wondering a second, Mike Huckabee
Speaker 1: classic rock cover has hit the timeline. He did it
Speaker 1: again similar quote unquote parody song you Know and Love.
Speaker 1: The point is he interacted with with Tucker Carlson in
Speaker 1: what was an astonishingly poor showing. From my perspective, I
Speaker 1: was just shocked how unable Huckaby was to answer even
Speaker 1: very very basic questions like, oh, well, if Israel has
Speaker 1: a right to exist, why just freaking out? Okay, well,
Speaker 1: let's accept that Israel has a white right to exist,
Speaker 1: why doesn't Ireland? And Huckaby in each case absolutely lost
Speaker 1: it seems. According to Tucker and a few others, his
Speaker 1: producers were sort of accosted by security as he left.
Speaker 1: Go figure. At least some sources were indicating that the
Speaker 1: US State Department had to call and sort of you
Speaker 1: get him out of that. But again, right, is the
Speaker 1: entire purpose of American civilization to guarantee a future for
Speaker 1: a Middle Eastern democracy? At least Mike hucker Be would
Speaker 1: lead you to think so. As part of the other
Speaker 1: tide of the title White Boy winner. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to pretend to know anything about hockey really at all,
Speaker 1: but I think, like any red blooded American, there was
Speaker 1: a tear in my eye when we absolutely demolished Canada
Speaker 1: in the Olympics. The aftermath was very funny. It sort
Speaker 1: of become a culture war issue because the women's hockey
Speaker 1: team also one, and of course, being you know, high
Speaker 1: end women's sports, there are all lesbians who hate Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: So there's become this very artificial culture war. It's sort
Speaker 1: of struggle over which hockey team is America's hockey team.
Speaker 1: It's dumb, but also now you see a video of
Speaker 1: a bunch of corn fed Midwestern boys he had an
Speaker 1: Italian nightclub singing the national anthem. It brings a tier
Speaker 1: to your eye. Other developments in White Boy Winter, Sean
Speaker 1: Strickland of UFC middleweight fame demolished some Mexican guy, Fluffy Hernandez.
Speaker 2: I believe he deported him.
Speaker 1: Yes, yeah, after some of the funniest trash doc I've
Speaker 1: ever seen. I'm not the biggest fan of Sean as
Speaker 1: a fighter for fairly obvious reasons, but he's really funny
Speaker 1: and a lot of people were nay saying him, mostly
Speaker 1: for culture war reasons. I'll admit I think he's funny.
Speaker 1: I get a little tired of the stick just because
Speaker 1: it's like his mouth sells the tickets his hands looked.
Speaker 1: But nonetheless I thought that was funny. And so I
Speaker 1: guess we've extended it right to white Boy Winner, right.
Speaker 1: So yeah, that's the actual title part of the stream.
Speaker 1: Now fifty minutes in, after a beef brief digression about
Speaker 1: the state of the Union and homelessness, I threw a
Speaker 1: bunch of you there, Carl. You're free to respond if
Speaker 1: you want to.
Speaker 2: All I'll say is that in response to some of
Speaker 2: the comments in the chat, or I should say to
Speaker 2: to yes and some of the comments in the chat,
Speaker 2: I am buying a custom revolver holster that is known
Speaker 2: as the Boomer. But yes you are in terms of
Speaker 2: current events, Yes, I mean.
Speaker 1: I had this conversation with one of my good buddies
Speaker 1: where we realized that we're transforming into nineteen eleven guys
Speaker 1: and we're like, oh, no, it's done. Then the toll
Speaker 1: White Sox come out. But once you have reached the
Speaker 1: revolver stage, you're done. You're cooked. There's there's no recovery.
Speaker 1: That's so you have entered the point of no return.
Speaker 1: You are eighty five years old.
Speaker 2: It's true, and I like it. So so here's here's
Speaker 2: the thing. When when you like Niche cartridges like forty
Speaker 2: four special, you can get really good loads for them,
Speaker 2: but it's really fun and easy to reload to a
Speaker 2: high standard of quality and ring many many uses out
Speaker 2: of your cases, which is cheap, which allows you to
Speaker 2: shoot a lot more at the same level of quality
Speaker 2: as anything else. And you really need it with Niche
Speaker 2: revolver cartridges because you don't want to spend fifty bucks
Speaker 2: for a box of fifty rounds. That gets old fast.
Speaker 2: So in terms of the kind of current events things,
Speaker 2: of course, everything is gay and retarded. I mean that's
Speaker 2: just what I kind of expect. I wake up, I
Speaker 2: look at the internet, I gough, and I close my
Speaker 2: curtains again and turn back to whatever. Yeah, it's pretty.
Speaker 2: It can seem very bleak, but once you accept it,
Speaker 2: it just becomes kind of like the uh, it just
Speaker 2: becomes like the seasons. You just go, eh, whatever does
Speaker 2: it come? In thirty two there is a thirty two
Speaker 2: h and r magnum iteration of this firearm that holds
Speaker 2: seven rounds.
Speaker 1: I want to find this actually because I'm not sure
Speaker 1: if I send it to you.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Do you remember the comment I got on on Patreon
Speaker 1: about our last conversation.
Speaker 2: Something about thirty two?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, well there's that one too, but a very
Speaker 1: funny comment where someone was basically saying I don't know
Speaker 1: anything about guns, and so I was planning to just
Speaker 1: skip this episode, and I went to check the time,
Speaker 1: and I realized I was fifty five minutes and you
Speaker 1: guys hadn't talked about guns once.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's right. That was funny.
Speaker 2: That's funny.
Speaker 1: This is very much a show about nothing. We're closing
Speaker 1: out the hour. Got a few super chats, if you
Speaker 1: guys want to send them, I would certainly appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Before I do, let me drop the link to uh
Speaker 1: not the article I forgot to put out yesterday again
Speaker 1: professional podcast ladies and gentlemen. But my piece in junto.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna go ahead confidently with that pronunciation, So
Speaker 1: give me a second, I will drop that link. Check
Speaker 1: this out with health. Thank you. Junto is it's actually
Speaker 1: it's a great, it's a great publication. Did you check
Speaker 1: out their intel tab Carl.
Speaker 2: Yes, I did. You mentioned it yesterday and I was.
Speaker 2: I found it very interesting and and useful. Lot of
Speaker 2: a lot of good resources there.
Speaker 1: Yes, the uh yeah, they've basically done a number of
Speaker 1: different Oh and they're changing already so it's constantly being updated.
Speaker 1: But they have a very detailed network map. They have
Speaker 1: a funding map, and then they have sort of talent network.
Speaker 1: So point is, if you're wondering where some random conservative
Speaker 1: policy wonk came from, who they're connected to, and how
Speaker 1: they get paid, well that's how you do it. So
Speaker 1: point is, it's a a very interesting map both for
Speaker 1: those looking for context right on who someone is, but
Speaker 1: also right if you're looking to do a little bit
Speaker 1: of open source intelligence. Anyway, check that out. I don't
Speaker 1: think there's anything to do other than just look at it.
Speaker 1: There's no cost to it, so it's worth that we
Speaker 1: have a few super chats. Obviously y'all can send more
Speaker 1: if you want. The creatively named Chief Slinging Beef going
Speaker 1: on vacation to the Old Dominion the summer haven't been back,
Speaker 1: but a one day trip in six years may keep
Speaker 1: a lawyer on retainer before I end up in your
Speaker 1: Commueland that's a good idea, mister Sling and Beef. You
Speaker 1: should because the laws are getting stupider and stupider. I'm
Speaker 1: not grim from redhood to said the USS Poop and Ferton.
Speaker 1: I think that is correct. The footage I've seen from it,
Speaker 1: it sort of looks like the Ganges. I saw some
Speaker 1: interesting cover on it. Apparently this is one of the
Speaker 1: ships that they tried to make fully gender neutral during
Speaker 1: the Biden years, so they ripped out all the plumbing
Speaker 1: and redid it. Who knows if that's related. It's funny,
Speaker 1: So I've decided to think it's true. Y'all going to
Speaker 1: be open carrying Rock Island nineteen eleven's driving jeeps with
Speaker 1: ducks on the dash and watching Mark Levinn for your opinions.
Speaker 1: Let it flow through you, so I will say, Carl,
Speaker 1: as you're aware, I'm up for a meme gun and
Speaker 1: I think it's funny. My newest monstrosity, of course, is
Speaker 1: this totally legitimate guysly six second mount in comic sands
Speaker 1: is the font that they've decided to put on it?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: Is it real?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: I paid forty dollars on eBay for it and put
Speaker 1: a also forty dollars red dove on it. I think
Speaker 1: it's fun so I'm up for a little bit of nonsense.
Speaker 1: You can probably see my side by side shotgun that
Speaker 1: once I figure out how to use atfe forms, I
Speaker 1: will be cutting down to as preposterously short as possible,
Speaker 1: again because it's funny. So that all said, Carl, there's
Speaker 1: a whole lot of Trump forty five and Trump forty
Speaker 1: six commemorative edition guns for oh very very cheap, we
Speaker 1: of them, I know. And there's something really funny about
Speaker 1: a fake gold plated Donald Trump forty five forty six
Speaker 1: Commemorative Presidential nineteen eleven.
Speaker 2: That is so said, I think you need to do it.
Speaker 2: I might.
Speaker 1: The problem is I probably would have thought it, but
Speaker 1: I as someone who has an impending legal deadline of July,
Speaker 1: I'm trying to look for things to not be able
Speaker 1: to and I'll be able to buy that forever because.
Speaker 2: That is much like that is much like the article
Speaker 2: that I wrote for Junto that hopefully they accept, oh.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, which we sort of went over last time.
Speaker 2: Yes, yeah, but yeah, yeah, you have to you have
Speaker 2: to plan these things out and you said, there's certainly
Speaker 2: no point in acquiring anything that is a meme gun
Speaker 2: that doesn't tick one of the boxes.
Speaker 1: Okay, So I see someone talking about guitarist Judge. So
Speaker 1: I sort of love collecting bizarre, very small YouTube channels
Speaker 1: like we're talking with like fifty subscribers, mostly just because
Speaker 1: I think that they're fine. And I have found let
Speaker 1: me go through and find it the probably the best
Speaker 1: boomer channel in the world. Effectively, this guy all he
Speaker 1: does is just turn on the camera talk. His wife
Speaker 1: is next to him. He's got a celtech. No, he's
Speaker 1: got a high point carbing behind him.
Speaker 2: M M.
Speaker 1: I can't find it. But he has the phonniest opinions,
Speaker 1: both on guns and on politics. He is like a
Speaker 1: perfect distilled boomer. Oh, I'll be so upset if I
Speaker 1: can't find this. Is that the guy I'm his only viewer?
Speaker 2: Is that the guy who like talks about how you're
Speaker 2: insane if you carry with a round in the chamber,
Speaker 2: but you show thinks.
Speaker 1: That I actually, yeah, that is exactly who it is.
Speaker 2: Oh, come on, that is hilarious. Oh no, that is hilarious.
Speaker 2: Is his wife Filipinos? No one asked.
Speaker 1: Literally, yes, she actually is, which is what makes it funny,
Speaker 1: because it's like, I know it's real, but it's like
Speaker 1: what you or I Karl would do is like a
Speaker 1: million dollar extreme skin. It is quite possibly one of
Speaker 1: the funniest unintentional You keep uh, you keep waffling. I'll
Speaker 1: find this, Okay, I need to share this with you, guys.
Speaker 2: Yeh. What I don't what I don't understand about the
Speaker 2: no round in the chamber guys, is is like what
Speaker 2: that tells me is that they're new to carry, like
Speaker 2: they didn't. They didn't start carrying until it was legal
Speaker 2: in Texas, which again I remind everyone that was nineteen
Speaker 2: ninety five, like your Texas is so based like that.
Speaker 2: A lot of that is is media hype. I'm sorry, Texans,
Speaker 2: I love you, but you know that it's true. If
Speaker 2: you're over the age of forty, which makes you a boomer,
Speaker 2: I wonder if that guy carries like a conventional modern
Speaker 2: revolver with an empty chamber under the firing pin, like
Speaker 2: my guest, that's my guess is that you know his
Speaker 2: his cylinder is loaded with five of six.
Speaker 1: I'm so mad I can't find this. So to that point, Carl,
Speaker 1: I had this moment. You and I were joking around
Speaker 1: in a group chat talking about the classic song Genuine
Speaker 1: by Pony that's not as thirty years old, and that
Speaker 1: is an uncomfortably long amount of time. Yes, I really
Speaker 1: feel as if I am old from that. Buck Mulligan,
Speaker 1: good to see you again.
Speaker 2: Man.
Speaker 1: Buck and I used to talk when I still did
Speaker 1: Twitter lives. While driving in the car. We had a
Speaker 1: very controversial discussion about UH. If I believe I think
Speaker 1: this is you man, you were you were at least
Speaker 1: on the phone before afterwards about the uh genetic results
Speaker 1: of channel slavery. I'll leave it at that.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: Tyler Olivierira has been posting controls for videos for years,
Speaker 1: but for some reason, the last one had his Patreon
Speaker 1: taken down. I can't understand why this one crossed the line.
Speaker 1: I get the sense, Buck, you're you're playing a little
Speaker 1: bit of a joke on this uh, because basically what
Speaker 1: he was doing was discussing, shall we say, aggressive moving
Speaker 1: habits of the Hasidim in New Jersey, particularly moving in
Speaker 1: and taking over small towns, and uh he is angered
Speaker 1: UH some in the international banking sector.
Speaker 2: We couldn't possibly know who.
Speaker 1: It sort of brings to mind that old Norm McDonald
Speaker 1: joke about uh, you know mar Linbrando right where it's
Speaker 1: uh Marlin. Now that Marlon Brando has apologized for saying
Speaker 1: that Jew's control Hollywood to a rabbi, he is now
Speaker 1: free to work in Hollywood again. I was on NBC,
Speaker 1: not my statement. Ah, super jackac two. You know what
Speaker 1: to do with this, I don't, but I do appreciate it.
Speaker 1: I haven't split with Carl, so thank you. Oh and
Speaker 1: and Buck gave me ten pounds, which you know, as
Speaker 1: an American, I don't fully understand exactly what that means.
Speaker 1: It seems like good money, so I appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Thank you, sir.
Speaker 1: I really cannot find this guy. I have a bad
Speaker 1: habit of both on Twitter and on this subscribing to
Speaker 1: entirely too many people, mostly because you know, there's just
Speaker 1: things I want to keep track of, and then my
Speaker 1: feed is completely and totally clogged up, so I can't
Speaker 1: find you.
Speaker 2: Like lots of left wing lunatics I've noticed.
Speaker 1: And a lot of Zionists, which is not good for
Speaker 1: my blood pressure, and roughly daily I have to talk.
Speaker 2: That's why I have to That's the only that's the
Speaker 2: reason why in that particular group chat that you mentioned,
Speaker 2: the reason I'm like not cortisol maxing all the time
Speaker 2: about what you know, the doings that are a transpiring
Speaker 2: is because I ignore those quote unquote people.
Speaker 1: Well, see it, that's actually very good at keeping me
Speaker 1: off the website. So I've just made it so toxic
Speaker 1: I myself cannot bear it.
Speaker 2: That's actually very sensible.
Speaker 1: Yeah, see that that's a strategy because.
Speaker 2: I'm an Internet addict and I need to do more
Speaker 2: like that. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well see this is this is the the kind of
Speaker 1: thought process behind it, right where it's like I have
Speaker 1: to understand that my self control is lacking, so I
Speaker 1: just have to salt the water. You know. It's like
Speaker 1: in the thirties when they just poisoned wood alcohol to
Speaker 1: keep people from drinking it. It's like, well, now I am,
Speaker 1: even by the standards of this hell site, completely into miserable.
Speaker 2: So, oh my goodness, oh my goodness, ooh ooh. A
Speaker 2: Bretta has released a twenty gauge A three hundred Ultima Patrol.
Speaker 1: You are ninety five years old.
Speaker 2: Eight three hundred is a good gun. People. People will
Speaker 2: be like, it's no thirteen oh one, Yeah, I know,
Speaker 2: but it's a it's a good solid gauge and a
Speaker 2: and a twenty gauge semi auto is is handy for
Speaker 2: the wife, one could say, and for the kidlets, and
Speaker 2: for you. Your split times in terms of like spraying
Speaker 2: a narrow hallway with buckshot are enhanced quite a bit.
Speaker 2: And last time I checked, like nine number one buck
Speaker 2: pellets blowing a hole in a person is like almost
Speaker 2: no different than nine double lot like in terms of
Speaker 2: their uh you know, internal ballistic wise.
Speaker 1: So I mean, after my my extensive uh my extensive
Speaker 1: taste testing, I can confirm mouthfields.
Speaker 2: Points zero point zero three inches and like two grains,
Speaker 2: three grains, five grains. It's like it's it's almost nothing.
Speaker 2: It's crazy.
Speaker 1: Uh, I'm not grim from red hood again like sewage
Speaker 1: Gulf Maxer Uh yeah, I mean parent the Potomac is
Speaker 1: just flooded with sewage, uh, which seems to be happening
Speaker 1: more and more in certain cities. I'm sure you remember
Speaker 1: when was it Jackson, Mississippi that just didn't have water
Speaker 1: for like a year. Yeah, Flint, Uh, you could even
Speaker 1: say New Orleans.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: There's a trend that inquisitive minds could plot out. I
Speaker 1: can't think of it. Uh, Michael, I can't read that.
Speaker 1: Michael De Rubio says boomers are over sixty, not over forty.
Speaker 1: Gen X is always left out. In the spirit of that,
Speaker 1: I am simply not going to address the gen x
Speaker 1: part of it because I'm leaving them out. But boomer
Speaker 1: is a state of mind.
Speaker 2: It is.
Speaker 1: It is a literal description, but also it's a metaphysical marker.
Speaker 1: So in much the same way that you know, Joe
Speaker 1: Bidenopolis once said, if you don't vote for me, you
Speaker 1: ain't black. If you don't have tall white socks, disdain
Speaker 1: for your own children, and an unabiding love for an
Speaker 1: eighty series nineteen eleven, you're not a boomer, regardless of
Speaker 1: how old you are. It's the kind of hard hitting,
Speaker 1: hard hitting opinions you get here, Carl, So I am,
Speaker 1: as you can probably tell, my voice is starting to
Speaker 1: give out the recording a lot. But Carl, if people
Speaker 1: are interested in finding you, where can they do so
Speaker 1: best places?
Speaker 2: Carl Dahl dot substack dot com on by book two
Speaker 2: books on Amazon under the