Speaker 1: Times after your betbuilders hang away a thread here, relax, relax,
they still need one more goal. Well if it loses,
Novi Bets got your cover.
Speaker 2: Nob Best is the home of the betfielder this World
Cup from goalscorers to cards. Get the fast value on every.
Speaker 1: Match, plus get money back as a free bash.
Speaker 3: If your betfielder loses on the biggest.
Speaker 2: Game every single day, joined today and get seventy.
Speaker 3: Euros in free beats nob Bash.
Speaker 1: More power to you.
Speaker 3: Decency's apply eighteen plus be responsibly gamblingcare, dot i E.
Speaker 4: Attention, gettowheads attention, bo scouts by the pseudonyms Nerdly. It's
time for the soul of excellence.
Speaker 5: He is a radio host at seventy seven WABC here
in New York.
Speaker 4: The Rush hour is on the air, Rush right now,
here's bos Nerdly.
Speaker 6: There are competing stories for the lead position, Carlos, let
me just ask you off the cuff, what would you
think would be the biggest story of the day, biggest thing.
Speaker 5: M h, I haven't been paying that much attention.
Speaker 6: Okay, good? How about a guy not going to the
bathroom is the biggest story. One of the biggest stories
of the day. Yeah, a guy not going to the bathroom.
Speaker 5: Why would that be a story like, I don't even care.
Speaker 2: I mean, I heard about it, but I okay.
Speaker 6: Because Corey Booker didn't go to the bathroom for seventeen hours,
that's a huge story.
Speaker 2: Huge.
Speaker 6: And Frank Luntz, Republican poster, says that the Booker marathon
speech may have changed the course of political history. A
guy standing up speaking in the well of the Senate.
Almost nobody watched it because most people don't watch what
happens in the United States Senate for very good reason.
Is may have changed, According to Frank Luntz, may have
changed the course of political history. I want to emphasize
what Corey Booker did over the last twenty four hours
may have changed the course of political history. I watched
a lot of it. I listened to words, I listened
to phrases. Frank Luntz said he confirmed that Booker's unprecedented
feat struck a tone with Americans. Most Americans in this
country have no idea right now.
Speaker 2: Who Corey Booker is.
Speaker 6: If he went out to the average Americans said who's
Corey Booker? They I don't know, Well, I don't know
who is he he struck the kind of tone the
grassroots Democrats are looking for. He gave them a reason
to fight, fight, fight, fight. And he didn't go to
the bathroom for seventier because he says he dehydrated himself before.
Don't tell his doctor. Of course, every Republican watching will
say this is nonsense. But he's not just speaking to Republicans.
He's speaking to Americans. He was speaking to himself and
a few people in the political class in this country
and news junkies who watch that sort of thing. No
one can tell you. Let me ask another question. It's
been all over the place, Jonas. What did Corey Booker
say during the course of his almost seventeen hours of
speaking that was important?
Speaker 2: What did he say?
Speaker 1: I can't recall.
Speaker 6: Okay, Carlos, what did Corey Booker say that was so
important that he changed the course of political history?
Speaker 5: He said, no to Chuck Schumer.
Speaker 6: I missed that part during the seventeen hours, tj What
did Corey Booker say that was so important that he
changed the course of political history? Okay, see, my friends,
and I'm asking you if you watched it, what did
he say that was so dagone important? That everything is
now changed because Corey Booker is the hero.
Speaker 2: All right. Elon Musk, let's get to this.
Speaker 6: Musk set back in Wisconsin raised US questions about his
future role. Musk not leaving yet wrapping up work on schedule.
Incredible work once, incredible work. It dog just complete, says
the White House. Uh okay, Republicans lost the Supreme Court seat.
They pumped money was pumped into this race's most expensive
judicial seat. I never expected Republicans to win it. I
didn't talk about it much. I talked about it a
little bit. I mentioned the fact that Elon was out there.
We didn't even play this somebody. I never expected Republicans
to win this seat, this judicial race. It's an look.
The energy has been going against Elon Musk and against
Donald Trump in the mainstream press. Wisconsin is a razor
thin margin for the presidential race, and Democrats, where energized,
have been energized with their anger and with their hatred
of Musk, which is by the way, taking its toll
on Tesla. Have a story here out of the Wall
Street General to Dave Tesla's global vehicle deliveries, saying thirteen
percent in the first quarter. That is a huge number,
weighed down by significant declines in some of Tesla's biggest markets.
So I mean he has taken a hit. No, I
see a call coming in. I'm gonna take the call
right now. Let's go because the question is are you
concerned about the Supreme Court election results in Wisconsin? And
Sandra is on the phone. Sandra, is that the question
that you have?
Speaker 7: Oh, hi, James, thanks for taking my quote so soon.
You know, I am concerned about the outcome in Wisconsin.
Happy about Florida, but not happy about Wisconsin. I feel
like these judges are getting out of control, and the
more that get hired that are on the liberal side,
the more it's going to have a domino effect and
all these judges are going to copy unfair behavior that
we have been witnessing for so long. Ever since Donald
Trump became president, we've been witnessing these judges that are
not doing the fair thing. So I don't like the
outcomes with Wisconsin.
Speaker 6: I don't like the outcome either, But guess what, so
what they wonder Wisconsin? Now, here's what's happening in that rate.
It's a Supreme Court seat. Democrats have been on a
legal push to change the law so that they could
jerry rig the state to kick Republicans out, jerry mander
in other words, their state. And they may end up
doing that. They may end up getting one, two, three
seats out of the deal. I don't even know how
many seats could be affected. But Democrats in power, they
just like Pennsylvania where you have these out of control
Democrat judges running the Supreme Court. Pennsylvania's just like that
their Supreme Court. You see it play out on election time. Look,
politics is a game that sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.
Last night, Republicans lost the Supreme The race for the
Supreme Court. Doesn't mean everything's all over. It doesn't mean that,
as you said, Republicans held on to two Republican seats
in Florida needed special elections for Rod DeSantis leveled a
blistering attack on the Republican winner of one of them,
and then but all in law, I'm not so worried
about it. Might I just be so bold as to
say this about jerry mandering seats.
Speaker 2: New York is playing games.
Speaker 6: Cathy Hockel's playing games, which is why at least Defonic
had to decline and Trump had to ask her not
to take on the role as ambassador to the UN
right now because Hokel's playing games with the special election
that could have happened and she was, they were doing
everything they can to try to unfairly take advantage of
it and turn that seat into a Republican seat. Democrats
are going to play games, that's what they do, okay,
But Republicans have control of state legislatures too. So my
message to Republicans is very simple. If Democrats can jerry mander,
so can you.
Speaker 2: So can you.
Speaker 6: If Democrats want to play games and try to stock
the deck to make sure that or Democrats get elected
to the House of Representatives, don't fall asleep on it.
They're playing hardball, so play hardball with them. They want
to wipe out a few Republican seats, use your state
legislatures to wipe out some Democrat seats. It's really simple answer.
Fire with fire. They want to play with fire. Politically speaking, now,
some might think that that's irresponsible. This is politics if
it is legally permitted. I am not suggesting that Republicans
ever do anything that is not legally permitted. You should
follow the constraints, follow act within the constraints.
Speaker 2: Of the law. Follow the laws.
Speaker 6: But if the law permits you to reorganize the seats
in your state so that you have the advantage, if
that's what Democrats are doing in with Wisconsin, that it
needs to be countered that simple legally, Sandra, I appreciate
the call it. I'm not worried about it. I'm not
worried about it. I think we have other things to
worry about. Things will happen the way that they happen.
Republicans have plenty of control in the states that they
can answer this back, and they should.
Speaker 2: Now. The Musk set.
Speaker 6: Back in Wisconsin raises questions about his future role. Must
Chosen candidate lost decisively, potentially raising questions about his future
role in the Trump administration. That is bunk. That's the
Washington Post. It is an election. They lost it. The
results didn't happen in Wisconsin the way they wanted. Everything
else that is going on, these changes that are happening
inside the federal government are They are so important to
the future of this country that that they cannot hinge
on being upset because Elon must candidate lost the race
in Wisconsin.
Speaker 2: These things are bigger than that.
Speaker 6: In fact, I have some audio today that you're not
gonna hear much else. It's the Robert Kennedy's guy in
AHHS was one of the political journalists Kelly Means is
his name. The White House Political Bureau chief Dana Burns.
These are some long cuts, but they are vital that
you hear what's going on. This is important stuff that's
happening inside HHS, and it is likewise important throughout the government.
So we're gonna take a quick break.
Speaker 4: The Rush Hour with Bose Nerdly Nerdly on seventy seven WADC.
Speaker 1: James Golden known popularly as both snrdly. This is the
rush Hour with those Nerdly rush.
Speaker 8: I cannot be the only person that feels this way,
but every time I see the American flag, whether it
be on somebody's car like a sticker, or like they're
wearing it on a hat or their shirt, or is
like hanging up outside of their house, like I'm just
gonna assume you're racist.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I love the way Carlos pronounces this group. I'm
not making fun of him because the bitch Boys and
I have friends who do it from Philippines at bitch Boys.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's go to the bitch Okay.
Speaker 6: Anyway, The Bitch Boys recorded their next single, I Get Around,
which became their first number one hit, this summer of nineteen.
In the summer of nineteen sixty four, this day is
when they recorded the song nineteen sixty four Mike Love
during the lead vocals falsetto by Brian Wilson James god
In snarly here. Now, I'm made a decision, folks, one
of these cuts with this You've got to hear. This
guy Kllie means he's with the political reporter. But these
cuts are long, so we're gonna do it after the
half hour. Got three of them. I want you to hear.
And the way that they're trying to attack Robert Kennedy
and his comebacks and this guy speaking is they are
lobbyists in the audience that are actually interacting with him
in a not so nice way. And you'll hear that.
You won't see it, but it's amazing what's happening there.
So another story today. Alan Dershowitz wrote an op ed.
We published it in The Daily yesterday. Can the government
cut off funding for woke colleges? There's a lot, As
you know, President Trump is saying Yeah, we're gonna withhold
fun And they're looking right now withholding some funds from
Harvard University that has Senator in Massachusetts Ed Markey total
leftists upset. This is what Markie had to say about
this Senator.
Speaker 3: Harvard University, of course, is central Massachusetts in the constitution
of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The President in the White
House threatening to withhold some nine billion dollars in funding
because it's not satisfied with the efforts that Harvard has
taken to fight anti semitism. Are you satisfied yourself with
the efforts that Harvard has taken to fight anti Semtism?
Speaker 9: Look at anti semitism is wrong. Anti Semitism must be fought.
Anti Semitism is something that we cannot tolerate in our nation.
But authoritarianism is not the answer to anti Harvard University
has hundreds thousands of scientists working on finding the cure
for Alzheimer's, for ca for diabetes, for Parkinson's disease. If
the plan of this administration is to just absolutely wipe
out the research that we are doing all across our country,
especially at our universities that have drawn the smartest young
people in our country and around the world to find
the cure for these diseases and do so in an
authoritarian way that it is going to ultimately wind up
very bad for our country. It is going to be
a returned to McCarthyism in the nineteen thirties. We know
that roy Cone was the mentor for Donald Trump, as
he was for McCarthey, as he was for Nixon, And
all we're seeing right now is just roy Combe once
again insinuating himself into the brain of a very powerful
person in our country, now, Donald Trump, and it's going
to turn out very poorly for our nation.
Speaker 10: James Golden, known popularly as most terribly.
Speaker 1: This is the rush hour with post nerdling. That's a
draw dropping number.
Speaker 2: Where'd all those people come from?
Speaker 11: Well, it's it made my draw drop too when I
saw it. You know, we were in so security looking
for fraud, wasting abuse, and to do that, we actually
looked at the enumeration system, the system by which people
get numbers in America, and we found that there were
just about five plus million of them that came into
the country as illegals. We're giving various forms of parole
allow in the country, and they got through an automatic system,
so security numbers to get into our benefit systems. And
we tracked that through and found that they were on
the benefit programs, and just because we were curious, we
then looked at see if they were on the voter rolls,
and we found in a handful of cooperative states that
they were thousands of the other voter rolls and that
many of them had voted.
Speaker 6: Yeah, five million illegal immigrants on American Big fits program,
includingselves of security, many many thousands.
Speaker 2: Registered to vote and voted. Despite all of.
Speaker 6: This business that the Democrats continually say, oh, no, no, no, no,
we don't need voter ID. Oh this citizenship bill is
oh no no, Why do you suppose Democrats don't want that?
By the way, that was Antonio Glacias on Fox News.
Well that's what that's what it prints out. I didn't
name them, could I say?
Speaker 2: Yes? Maybe I don't know.
Speaker 6: Marvin Gaye's heavenly birthday to day, I said, Marvin gay
and Carlos is like, we just played Marvin gay yesterday.
I said, you know, Carlos, Marvin made more than one record,
didn't I say that?
Speaker 12: Carlos and Carlos, what do you have against Marvin Gaye,
You sure yes.
Speaker 6: Because Marvin gay is called the Prince of Soul, the
Prince of sold the Prince of Motown. Yesterday, of course,
was the anniversary of him being shot dead by his dad.
Today is the heavenly birthday of Marvin Gaye, born in
nineteen thirty nine. Decades of great music as a solo artist,
as a producer, they say singer, songwriter in a lot
of the things, they leave off the fact that he's
a brilliant producer. A lot of those hits by the Originals,
Marvin wrote those and produced those he did being produced
the first album or parts of it after Smokey Robinson left,
the Miracle with the Miracles. Brilliant Marvin Gaye, of course,
the duets with Tommy Terrell, Kim Wesson, Diana Ross, Marvin, Marvin, Marvin,
have you haaven? A birthday to Marvin Gaye. Also, by
the way, birthday of Leon Russell today. Another one that's
just a giant in the recording industry and my dad's time.
They and I'd listened to it because my dad used
to listen to it. The Mills Brothers. A lot of
people don't even know who they are. The Mills brothers.
Herbert Mill's birthday today too, the Mills brothers. Anyway, Okay,
let's deal with this AHHS thing, folks. This is important.
They are ragging everybody. You see what they're trying to
do to Elon. They're trying to destroy him. No one
has ever refuted, by the way, any of these things
that are coming up. So I want you to listen
to carefully, very carefully, and I may interrupt it because
this is long. Can't just let it run for five
minutes and six seconds to Callie Memes, special government employee
for Health and Human Services.
Speaker 2: Do you know that Health and Human.
Speaker 6: Services HHS has a bigger budget than the Pentagon? Yes,
So he is being grilled by this hostile journalist Dasha Burns,
who was Political's chief White House Court a person bureau.
She runs the White House Bureau for Politico. And let's
go to that first. The first one from him, CALLI means,
and just listen to the line of questioning and then
listen Alan interrupt maybe how she goes to it.
Speaker 2: Cut forward. Let's start.
Speaker 13: Well, right now, it seems like the first priority has
actually been to make a lot of cuss. This week,
there's news of massive cuss to HHS. Just this point,
about a quarter of HHS's eighty two thousand employees have
left or expected to be terminated. So just some of
the change here. You've laid off big chunks of offices
in charge of vaccine and drug research, HIV, AIDS research, AI,
funding for services for the elderly and low income people,
STD prevention, rural health with very little lead time. What
do you say to people in the public who are
concerned now about drug safety, about whether we're prepared for
the next pandemic, when these cuts have happened so hard,
so fast.
Speaker 10: Yeah, I'd say to the reporters in the room and
the lobbyists in the room, I mean, obviously, make your case,
but I'd truly ask for, as you're making it, a
little bit of humility about what the voters were trying
to say by putting Bobby Kennedy Junior in this position
of power. I would a little bit of humility to
ask why Bobby Kennedy along with President Trump, are the
two most popular political figures.
Speaker 5: In America by far.
Speaker 10: What the voters are trying to say, and I think
they were right, is that the system is really on
the wrong track, that the existing health authorities. Just demonstrably
the NIH oversaw and this is just consensus at this point,
the creation, the literal creation of a pandemic. The NIH,
whose goal is to promote American health, has overseen a devastation,
just an object devastation in American health over the past
twenty years, with disease rich skyrocketing and America almost every
single croc disease, with rates of nearly every single crime
disease being at an all time high among kids. There's
been very little innovation with small pharma, with innovative therapeutics
that the FDA it costs a billion dollars to get
through the process. CMS is an agency that's a much
larger budget than Defense Department, that's controlled by the American
Medical Association, which is a pharmaceutical lobbying group, and it's
almost predominantly sick care.
Speaker 5: So there's real problems.
Speaker 10: And you know, when you turn on CNBC, it's just
a NonStop it's a NonStop infomercial for pharma. It's a
sky rasy commercial, followed by Scott Gottlieb saying how Bobby's
killing people, followed by a breathless coverage of the measles
outbreak and no mention of mental health crisis.
Speaker 13: And a bunch of hhs.
Speaker 5: It is It is insane.
Speaker 10: It is insane for you to insinuate that the thing
standing between us and better health is Morgan bureaucrats Like that.
Speaker 13: Is demonstily That's not what I'm saying.
Speaker 5: That is what everyone's saying.
Speaker 10: That is absolutely insane to insinuate that it's some.
Speaker 5: Crime, not all bureaucrats.
Speaker 13: There's a lot of scientists, it's researchers, it's it's people
who are making.
Speaker 10: Sure that those scientists fundamentally have overseen just a monstrably
a record of utter failure, of utter failure.
Speaker 5: It would be insane.
Speaker 2: Is that funny?
Speaker 14: Is that not?
Speaker 2: Is that audience? I'd love to hear. How So, what.
Speaker 10: Metrics would you guys point to for how the scientific community,
how the four times more per capita on healthcare spending
that we spend in America FOREUS other countries has produced innovation?
Has there been one single chronic disease medication in modern
American history?
Speaker 5: There's lowered rate to the chronic disease.
Speaker 10: It is appropriate that the American and Chademy Pediatrics right now,
which is ninety percent funded by pharma is pushing o
zipic on six world. That is what the medical authority
they're doing.
Speaker 13: Why not then use the power that you guys have.
He is calling these the existing infrastructure in that direction
instead of slashing it ultimately.
Speaker 10: Not slashing, it's taking it back to twenty seventeen levels.
That's not slashing the amount of bureaucracts fund them. In
many cases, it's it's it's it's actually just not that much,
but it is. It is cutting what is it twenty
thousand people, it's taking it back to it's taking the
HHS back to sixty eight thousand employees.
Speaker 2: It is sixty eight thousand employees.
Speaker 10: Feel that Bobby Kennedy should not come in and make
dramatic changes to the leadership and the personnel at these
authorities that have overseen an abject devastation of American health,
which the lobbyists in this room do not have the
humility to admit that we have gone completely wrong.
Speaker 2: The lobbyists and the lobbyist are there children world?
Speaker 10: If you guys, if that is your attitude and your
attitude is to tell the MAHA moms that they're they're
vote and their voice is not legitimate that we need
dramatic changes to American healthcare. If you think it is
illegitimate for Bobby Kennedy to not make big changes to
people like Peter Marx, who once again, again and again
and again win against FDA advisory opinions, who fired the
two top vaccine makers, the two top vaccine scientists at
the FDA, for suggesting that we shouldn't mandate COVID shots
for soldiers, who continually continually win against expert opinion in
favor of the pharmaceutical industry, who many people here were
collaborating with him with the fact that somebody like that
can't be fired and he can't install tremendous people like
Marty McCarey and Jay Badisharia and doctor Oz to start
reforming these agencies and put in their people. Of course
you should do that. That's what people voted for.
Speaker 6: That, my friends, is something you don't see in Washington much.
The lobbyist in the room. You heard one of them
interject that one of those a lobbyist or whether it
was one of the scientists crowd, but and throughout the
rest of his speech with them, these people were hot
because what he's been saying, is he's pulling the rug,
he's showing it. The relationship between the AMA, which he
called nothing more than pretty much and I'm paraphrasing, you
heard him pretty much a propaganda unit for big pharma
and calling out you know, media types, calling out everything
else for this pretty much said what many of us
know now that NIH was heavily involved. And I'm a
big fan of NIH. I keep saying that NIH THO
the leadership heavily involved in the creation of the pandemic,
or as some people call it, the plandemic. Anyway, we
have two more. This guy's taking no prisoners. Let's go
to this narrative on media research, on research being cut.
Let's hear him address that or that's cut five.
Speaker 13: Carlos not questioning that. I'm questioning how you do all
of that research and work when you're when you're slashing
it and cutting Has.
Speaker 5: An i H.
Speaker 10: Funding been slashed?
Speaker 5: Yes?
Speaker 2: Has research?
Speaker 5: Yes, research has not been cut.
Speaker 13: The funding has been cut.
Speaker 10: Research funding has not been cut. The NIH now has.
Speaker 5: The indirect funding.
Speaker 10: Indirect funding does not indirect.
Speaker 5: It's amazing, it's amazing.
Speaker 10: How many people here care about the health of American children.
Speaker 5: I'm actually inspired. Thank you for thank you for the care,
Thank you for the care.
Speaker 10: UH put out guidance that they want to direct and
cut indirect funding that fundamentally means more money is going
to researchers.
Speaker 2: The guidance, the guidance that Bobby.
Speaker 5: Kennedy and the Trump administration.
Speaker 10: This means more money is going to frontline researchers to
do research. There is a very clear signal demonstrably with
what is happening, which is that government bureaucrats are being
disempowered and more money is going.
Speaker 5: To actual researchers. They are hissing.
Speaker 10: They are hissing about changes to a system that has
caused absolute devastation to American health, about policies that give
more money today, more money will be flowing.
Speaker 5: To actual researchers.
Speaker 10: Not university bureaucrats knock out serious actual researchers. Not a
dollar of services has been cutting. There has been an
attack on bureaucracy, both with the indirect funding.
Speaker 5: Because of the NIH.
Speaker 10: Not money, however, was getting seventy cents on the dollar,
not for research with a grant, but FORAU bureaucracy.
Speaker 2: Cutting intorect cost.
Speaker 10: Gets more money to researchers. The people can believe this
or not. There is a absolute fixation in this administration,
powering researchers on getting money to scientists and not telling
them what the answer should be, not telling them what
to study, asking them to do bold research on why
we're getting sick.
Speaker 13: I actually do understand that it's it's you know, the
friends that I have.
Speaker 6: And now, by the way, let's go. I just sensed
it enough for her. The look remember that first cut
we played from earlier on with Markey complaining about all
the billions of dollars that Donald Trump wants to withhold
from Harvard. What are we just learning this cut? Seventy
percent of that nine billion dollars does not go to
the scientist, does not go to the research. It goes
to the bureaucrats, the administration of Harvard University. And this, folks,
is why the left is so upset. Everywhere you look,
the way that they have been funding themselves on your
dime is being exposed left and right. Got one more
from Cali, and he talks about the food prices and
food poisoning with children.
Speaker 13: Here it is becoming healthier can be expensive right now in.
Speaker 2: America becoming healthy.
Speaker 13: Food that is better for you costs more, and it
is such a barrier for lower income Americans that also
have the health outcunch. So how are you planning to
bring down the cost of being healthier in America?
Speaker 10: Yeah, one thing Bobby Kennedy is not going to do
is entertain comments from food ustry lobbyists using food prices
as an excuse to continue poisoning children, Like, that's not
going to work. And I know a lot of you
guys are doing that, and I own you really back up.
That's an evil argument. That's the only argument the food
industry is making right now. They're trying to hold a
gun on food prices to literally not even dispute the
premise that Americans are being poisoned. We have ten thousand
chemicals in our food that are not allowed in the
other country. We fundamentally American food companies make their food
with different ingredients than other countries. I mean the food
guys as obvi, because it's been a flashpoint.
Speaker 5: American companies are making their.
Speaker 10: Products here with crude oil derived food dies and making
the exact same product shipping in Canada.
Speaker 5: With beet juice and carrot juice.
Speaker 10: So I think when this starts, Bobby's going to and
Secretary Kennedy's going to first talk about transparency.
Speaker 5: And that's what he's done. He's talked about grass standards.
Speaker 10: Fundamentally, what he's asking for is we need to understand
what's in our food. The FDA currently does not have
a list of what's in our food. They do not
have a list. It's self pleased, unbelievable. He's gonna work
with the NAH, work with the FDA to list of
what is in our food and have postmark review of
those chemicals. There's a lot of lobbying to actually prevent
even transparency.
Speaker 6: Even so we got to go, I want to cut
it there because he's got the point. The FDA doesn't
even know what's in the food. There is not even
a list.
Speaker 4: This is the rush Hour with bo nerd lyad on
seventy seven DC.
Speaker 1: James Golden, known popularly as both Nerdly. This is the
rush Hour with those Nerdly rush.
Speaker 4: James Golden aka Bose Nerdly presents rubbed Phones.
Speaker 6: We begin with Elk in New York City. Elek, how
are you welcome?
Speaker 14: Yeah? Regardless of tariffs. On the theory of carrot and steak.
Perhaps it might be a good idea to have five
years federal tax free for companies returning that stayed and
start up.
Speaker 6: WHOA, now that's an interesting proposal. I wonder if someone
would take a look at that. I don't know whether
five years, but you know, it would be amazing. Is
an inducement to bring companies back into the United States.
You know, Donald Trump is already brought by by estimation
at their own estimation of the deals that they've got.
They're they're estimating somewhere between two and four trillion dollars
in new business coming back in the country. So that
would be a very interesting inducement. Thank you for the call,
Alec Very wise Steve in New York, you're up next.
Speaker 2: How are you? How you doing?
Speaker 15: Both?
Speaker 2: Just two quick things.
Speaker 14: One have you ever heard of Paul Harvey?
Speaker 6: Of course, Paul Harvey is a giant in the radio business,
and he was before Rush. He was the biggest thing
in the radio business.
Speaker 15: Listen to his I with the Devil and listen to
what's going on today.
Speaker 6: I was the Devil was one of his most brilliant monologues.
And at some point it would be nice you know,
maybe we could get permission to play the whole thing
because you're pointing out something. It is a great monologue,
and the premise of it, folks, is if he were
the devil, this is what he would do to the country.
I'll let you finish the rest, Steve, go ahead.
Speaker 15: Turning kids away from religion, turn them away from the family.
Speaker 2: I don't remember the rest of it, but they do.
Speaker 6: Oh man, he had a long list of them. But
it was a great monologue and very memorable, a wonderful speech. Actually,
thank you, Steve. Appreciated Grant in New York. You are
up next.
Speaker 15: Thank you number one. I want you to take over
the hours that Sid does Ego show have and number two.
Speaker 2: Hold hold it, hold it, hold it, hold it, hold it.
Speaker 6: I appreciate your remarks, but I must say this, never
speak ill of Sid.
Speaker 2: I love Sid.
Speaker 6: And you know what, Sid is the number one broadcaster
in New York and the surrounding areas doing his during
his morning show because he's an amazing guy and he's
a colleague of mine. Now, Grant, what else did you
call in and speak about?
Speaker 15: Instead of vosion Trump? Just exposing these fallacious spending bills
that are in there. They should also expose the senator
or their representative that put the bills in the budget.
Speaker 6: Well, I believe a lot of that is coming, and
you know, Pam Bondi is also talking about trying to
seek some clawback for some of this. Did Tom ever
make it back online? Nope? Okay and Nate sorry, we're
out of time anyway, We gotta go. Listen, folks, Make
God bless and protect each and every single one of you,
your family, your loved ones, love and gratitude for your
being here with me, allowing me to be with you,
God willing. We are back tomorrow already for the Thursday edition.