Speaker 1: This is Dan Kaplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. The American Way
Speaker 1: is back, and I don't think this has come out
Speaker 1: of the gate kind of question. Has there been another
Speaker 1: moment in your lifetime? Has it been another moment that
Speaker 1: just felt so much like things were shifting dramatically for
Speaker 1: the better. I'm not talking about puppies and rainbows and
Speaker 1: they'll never be pain again. I'm just talking about a
Speaker 1: major landscape shift, not just in America but in the world,
Speaker 1: you know, and coming obviously at the same time as
Speaker 1: President Trump winning re election. Have you, well, I can't
Speaker 1: put it that way, winning a second term? So have
Speaker 1: you lived through a moment? Have you lived through a
Speaker 1: moment where there's been such an obvious positive shift eight
Speaker 1: five five, four zero five eight two five five The
Speaker 1: number techs d an five seven, seven through nine. If
Speaker 1: you disagree with my premise, obviously we'll start there right.
Speaker 1: If you don't think that such a dramatic, major, obvious
Speaker 1: dynamic is occurring in America and the world today. So
Speaker 1: I want to get your take on that, because I
Speaker 1: believe it is, and I believe that there are many,
Speaker 1: many tangible signs of that, and in fact, each day
Speaker 1: seems to bring another one right. And it's it's not
Speaker 1: as if you know how life is. No matter how
Speaker 1: well things are going, it's not as if there's ever
Speaker 1: going to be a straight arrow up on a graph.
Speaker 1: There are always going to be ups and downs. But
Speaker 1: where's that trend line? And I think what we've seen
Speaker 1: since the election day Donald Trump won that decisive second term.
Speaker 1: I think what we've seen is that line going from
Speaker 1: trending down to trending up, with some ups and downs,
Speaker 1: but a.
Speaker 2: Clear trend up.
Speaker 1: And critically, you know, most dramatic in those categories that
Speaker 1: matter most, such as you know, world peace, safety and security, etc.
Speaker 1: So I want to get your take on that, and
Speaker 1: that ties into the local stuff as well, because listen,
Speaker 1: I think this is just gravity, and this is the
Speaker 1: reality in Colorado.
Speaker 2: It's just gravity. If you have.
Speaker 1: Lefty policies in place, if the left controls your place,
Speaker 1: whether your place is a teeny village or it's a
Speaker 1: city or it's a state, then that place is going
Speaker 1: to deteriorate. That place is going to degrade over time,
Speaker 1: and how quickly. It just depends on a bunch of
Speaker 1: different factors. But we're experiencing that here in Colorado, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, can anybody really make an argument that sense
Speaker 1: leftist rule took over in Colorado that things have gotten
Speaker 1: better in what way?
Speaker 2: I'd be curious.
Speaker 1: There may be some way out there in what way
Speaker 1: if it all? Has Colorado gotten better under leftist rule?
Speaker 1: And it's easy to point ten or twenty different ways
Speaker 1: it's gotten worse. And that's just gravity. That's just what's
Speaker 1: going to happen. When you've got bad ideas in place,
Speaker 1: and no matter how nice, sir, charming, or smart or
Speaker 1: otherwise competent the people executing those policies are pushing those policies,
Speaker 1: You're going to go downhill because those policies don't work.
Speaker 1: And then when you layer in competence and other unfortunate
Speaker 1: things on top of that, it's just going to go
Speaker 1: downhill quicker. So, yeah, can you point to Ryan, Can
Speaker 1: anybody point to anything that's gotten better in Colorado since
Speaker 1: full leftist rule took over? And let's see when would
Speaker 1: you pin that to time wise? I just want to
Speaker 1: think about that for a second. When did the Republicans
Speaker 1: get everything statewide and really start to build those majorities
Speaker 1: in the legislature. Different people have different takes on that,
Speaker 1: but probably probably go back to twenty twelve at the latest.
Speaker 1: But in any case, has anything gotten better since they
Speaker 1: took over?
Speaker 2: And then the.
Speaker 1: Related question in Colorado how bad does it have to
Speaker 1: get before the voters say no, we're going to give
Speaker 1: the Republicans a chance again statewide?
Speaker 2: How bad would that have to get?
Speaker 1: My premise, as you know, if you're kind enough to
Speaker 1: listen to this show, is that deterioration alone will never
Speaker 1: be enough to put Republicans back in power. It will
Speaker 1: never be enough. It's going to take a combination of
Speaker 1: deterioration and some other circumstances. You know, the right candidate
Speaker 1: on the right, that the wrong candidate on the.
Speaker 2: Left, et cetera.
Speaker 1: But deterioration alone, no, I don't think that's going to
Speaker 1: flip Colorado from a D plus whatever state statewide to
Speaker 1: Republicans winning.
Speaker 2: But can it be done?
Speaker 1: You bet eight foy five for zero five A two
Speaker 1: five five takes D an five, seven, seven, three nine.
Speaker 1: I want to keep talking about this really important study
Speaker 1: came out nationally that showed traffic in Colorado, in the
Speaker 1: Denver metro in particular, getting worse at a faster clip
Speaker 1: than any city in America. Why that's occurring? In what
Speaker 1: the fix is? Because if you're listening to this show,
Speaker 1: chances are you're either on the road now, or you
Speaker 1: were at some point today, or you will be soon.
Speaker 1: It's just a real important part of all of our lives.
Speaker 1: And it is a tax, roadway congestion. And Ryan, can
Speaker 1: you please, I don't know, can we copyright this trademark,
Speaker 1: this whatever. I'm not sure it's ever been said before,
Speaker 1: but congestion on our roadways is a tax. It taxes you,
Speaker 1: and it taxes you something far more important than money.
Speaker 1: It taxes you your time. And yes, it's a tax. You
Speaker 1: can escape if you decide to just, you know, move
Speaker 1: out to the middle of nowhere, somewhere where there is
Speaker 1: no traffic. But you escape it at an unreasonably high price,
Speaker 1: you know, and you shouldn't have to.
Speaker 2: You shouldn't have to.
Speaker 1: I don't understand how any politician from any party gets
Speaker 1: re elected if during their tenuere traffic gets worse, right,
Speaker 1: they'd have to do something really really special in some
Speaker 1: other area to way that. So I did want to
Speaker 1: keep talking about why is traffic getting so much worse
Speaker 1: in the Denver metro area than any other city in
Speaker 1: the country eight five or Z five E two five.
Speaker 2: Five texts dam five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: I have a feeling one way or the other will
Speaker 1: end up continuing our conversation yesterday about the Rolling Stones
Speaker 1: and about this very fair question are they just satanic?
Speaker 1: Are they just satanic? And this is coming from a
Speaker 1: guy who twenty four hours ago really enjoyed the Stones,
Speaker 1: been to their concerts, really enjoyed them. But then a
Speaker 1: caller educates me on some of their lyrics, which truly
Speaker 1: are the lyrics are satanic blatantly, And then the lyrics
Speaker 1: are also in Brown Sugar satanic in the sense that
Speaker 1: only and could celebrate slavery, sexual torture, etc. As the
Speaker 1: Rolling Stones doing that song. So one way or the other,
Speaker 1: I think we end up back there now.
Speaker 3: I did get finally a response from my father, who
Speaker 3: was twenty four years old when that song came out
Speaker 3: Brown Sugar in nineteen seventy one, he lived through it.
Speaker 3: Big fan of the Beatles, Jimi Hendrix led Zeppelin and
Speaker 3: the Rolling Stones, and I asked him about, you know,
Speaker 3: song of the Times early seventies, was it controversial in
Speaker 3: its time? And he replied with the following. Now, I
Speaker 3: must preface this. He's not a religious man at all.
Speaker 3: He's agnostic at best. But he said, quote, I personally
Speaker 3: didn't see the song as controversial. The fact that Jagger
Speaker 3: seems to be romanticizing black girls could be interpreted as
Speaker 3: controversial for the Times.
Speaker 2: I just thought it was pretty cool. That was for
Speaker 2: my death?
Speaker 1: Well, and I get that because I think the broad
Speaker 1: impression is that that's what Jagger was doing.
Speaker 2: That's what I thought.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that's what everybody thought. But then yesterday
Speaker 1: we get this caller who actually gets into the lyrics.
Speaker 1: And when you actually hear the lyrics at that point,
Speaker 1: no decent person, I mean, no one other than Satan
Speaker 1: himself could endorse those lyrics, right, And so that just
Speaker 1: brings me back to, in reality, is that band satanic?
Speaker 1: And let me quote the lyrics, And.
Speaker 2: Again I had no clue.
Speaker 1: I just thought the Brown Sugar this and that, okay,
Speaker 1: singing about you liking black women. But here's what the
Speaker 1: lyrics actually are. Yeah, Gold Coast slave ship bound for
Speaker 1: cotton fields, sold in a market down in New Orleans,
Speaker 1: scarred old slaver knows he's doing all right. Hear him
Speaker 1: whip the women just around midnight.
Speaker 2: That's Satan.
Speaker 1: I mean, who other than Satan could write those lyrics
Speaker 1: celebrating celebrating a slaver raping his female slaves. And then
Speaker 1: the song gets worse from there. But play the play
Speaker 1: the song real time when we come back, if you would, Ryan,
Speaker 1: because yeah, I think most people had the other impression.
Speaker 1: So my question now isn't hey, is everybody who enjoyed
Speaker 1: that song in a concert or racist? No, that isn't
Speaker 1: my question. My question is is that band satanic? Because
Speaker 1: it it wrote that song, it recorded that song, you
Speaker 1: can be sure it thought about the lyrics, and it
Speaker 1: played that song thousands of times in concerts celebrating slavery
Speaker 1: and sexual torture. So I was right it was going
Speaker 1: to come up on the show again.
Speaker 2: Today. We raised it height.
Speaker 1: Five four zero five two five five text d an
Speaker 1: five seven seven three nights. So when we come back,
Speaker 1: we'll get to some of those texts. And I want
Speaker 1: to talk about some of this other local stuff over
Speaker 1: arc on the show today. How could you not We're
Speaker 1: just going to play a lot of trump sound, a
Speaker 1: lot of trump sound from that instant classic press or
Speaker 1: get into some of the issues it raises. But locally,
Speaker 1: I also want to find out from you whether you
Speaker 1: think Aurora should sue Denver because Mayor Mike Kauffman coming out.
Speaker 1: He put it in the gazette. He says Denver mayor
Speaker 1: secretly worked with non governmental groups to unload a bunch
Speaker 1: of Venezuela and immigrants on Aurora and is badly damaged
Speaker 1: Aura in the process. So do you think there's a
Speaker 1: valid lawsuit there? Eight five eight two five five. Y're
Speaker 1: on the Dan Kapler Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 2: That'll be the last time you ever hear that song
Speaker 2: on this show.
Speaker 1: And the reason I asked for it is not to
Speaker 1: enjoy it or anything else, but to condemn it and
Speaker 1: to point out that I think virtually all of us
Speaker 1: forever have just thought that song was Mick Jagger thinking
Speaker 1: about how he was attracted to women of color. And
Speaker 1: then a caller points out yesterday, no it's actually celebrating
Speaker 1: slavery and sexual torture and rape, and the caller one correct,
Speaker 1: and that just raises the issue is that band truly satanic?
Speaker 2: Because only Satan could do that?
Speaker 1: And you have another song of theirs that just is
Speaker 1: flat out praising and endorsing Satan. So anyway, that's just
Speaker 1: out there. We talked about it a bunch later in
Speaker 1: the show yesterday. If you have thoughts, happy to take them,
Speaker 1: particularly if you disagree. Lots of other ground to cover today,
Speaker 1: wanted to throw this out there for you. I don't
Speaker 1: think there's any question about who the Denver Post is
Speaker 1: pushing and endorsing for governor, and that would be Phil Wiser.
Speaker 1: Have you noticed you ever? You go to the Post
Speaker 1: news website right right?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean I'm there multiple times a day, not
Speaker 1: because I agree with them editorially, but obviously I'm preparing
Speaker 1: for the show. And this breaking news banner, at least
Speaker 1: on my phone, breaking news banner that's been up for
Speaker 1: about what a week now, at the top of their
Speaker 1: website every single day every time I go there, breaking
Speaker 1: Attorney General Phil Wiser announces run for Colorado governor.
Speaker 2: That's odd, didn't that happen about a week ago. I
Speaker 2: was out of town. But didn't that happen a week ago?
Speaker 6: I did?
Speaker 1: Okay, how is that breaking news a week later? And listen,
Speaker 1: I understand it. If Martians have landed in Colorado and
Speaker 1: they've like taken over the capitol and now you got
Speaker 1: little green men and women running the state, then you
Speaker 1: run that banner for a week, right, But Phil Wiser,
Speaker 1: who's polling at eight percent among Democrats, announces for governor
Speaker 1: and they run a breaking news banner for a week.
Speaker 7: No.
Speaker 1: I think it's just it's what we suspected before, right
Speaker 1: when you saw you saw Kyle Clark going after Jenna
Speaker 1: Griswold so hard, But then you didn't see you didn't
Speaker 1: see police calling for a resignation or Wiser, you didn't
Speaker 1: see a special council appointed, etc. I called it on
Speaker 1: air at that point. You know, the powers that be
Speaker 1: on the left want Griswold out of the way. They
Speaker 1: want Wiser is their nominee. And I think the Post
Speaker 1: now openly obviously endorsing Wiser and trying to convince people
Speaker 1: this is really some important kind of news when I
Speaker 1: think it's a total yawner for everybody except that eight percent.
Speaker 2: But yeah, breaking news.
Speaker 1: So let's say, and soon we'll have some Republican candidates declaring. Right,
Speaker 1: let's say a Republican candidate declaries, Do you think you're
Speaker 1: going to have that banner up there for a week?
Speaker 2: I would bet against that.
Speaker 1: Hey want to get to just some of this awesome
Speaker 1: sound before they had a text or to Dan. The
Speaker 1: sad thing about the seventies music, which I grew up
Speaker 1: listening to also is a lot of times we didn't
Speaker 1: pay attention to the lyrics. We just liked the music
Speaker 1: and then listen, there are plenty of those songs where
Speaker 1: you'd try to pay attention to lyrics but you couldn't
Speaker 1: understand them, right, just couldn't understand them. But let me
Speaker 1: get back because I think it's instant, classic stuff. And
Speaker 1: obviously the world already is so much better off because
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is one reelection and he hasn't sworn in
Speaker 1: for that second term yet. But some of the greatest
Speaker 1: hits from yesterday, and then some of the issues that
Speaker 1: we want to kick around.
Speaker 7: Remember, this is a man that said he wants the
Speaker 7: transition to be smooth.
Speaker 2: Well, you don't do the.
Speaker 7: Kind of things you don't have a judge working real
Speaker 7: hard to try and embarrass you because I did nothing wrong.
Speaker 7: By the way, I did nothing, absolutely nothing wrong. If
Speaker 7: I did something wrong, I wouldn't be standing here right
Speaker 7: now because I won all these cases. Nobody's ever won
Speaker 7: so many cases as I have against the Justice Department.
Speaker 7: I mean, Jacksmith had cases all over the place. People
Speaker 7: were being subpoened, the lives were being ruined, they were
Speaker 7: spending everything they had money. We were helping them out,
Speaker 7: we had to. They they were stupoating people from that
Speaker 7: had no idea what they were even talking about.
Speaker 1: Well, and of course he won the biggest case at
Speaker 1: all of all in the court of public opinion, right
Speaker 1: because obviously the left was trying to misuse the legal
Speaker 1: system politically motivated prosecutions to jail a political opponent they
Speaker 1: could not defeat at the polls. And they were right
Speaker 1: that they couldn't defeat them at the polls. They were
Speaker 1: wrong to threaten the very foundation of this country by
Speaker 1: abusing the legal system to jail a political opponent.
Speaker 2: That's third world stuff.
Speaker 1: And as predicted on the show, the American people rejected
Speaker 1: the third world stuff very decisively. So yeah, he not
Speaker 1: only won, and you know in the broad sense, you
Speaker 1: know those cases, he won the biggest case of all
Speaker 1: in the court of public opinion.
Speaker 7: That's a sick group of people, and it was all
Speaker 7: to influence the election. It was all a fight against
Speaker 7: a political opponent. We've never had that in this country.
Speaker 7: We have had that in certain countries. We've had that in.
Speaker 2: Third giear countries.
Speaker 7: We've had that in Banana republics, but we've never had
Speaker 7: that in a place like the United States. I don't
Speaker 7: even know if it's been on a small level. I'm
Speaker 7: sure it has been on a small level, but this
Speaker 7: was the largest level ever.
Speaker 2: They brought this moron out of the Hague. He's a
Speaker 2: mean guy.
Speaker 6: He's a mean, nasty guy.
Speaker 7: His picture was perfect because you look at his picture,
Speaker 7: you say, that's a bad guy with his robe, his
Speaker 7: purple robe, and he executed.
Speaker 2: He shouldn't be allowed.
Speaker 7: To execute people because he'll execute everybody. He's a nutsyep.
Speaker 7: But we want all of those cases with him.
Speaker 1: This is going to be a very highly entertained four years, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is going to be great because listen,
Speaker 1: this lawfair thing is we've talked about this country cannot be.
Speaker 1: If you disagree with the premise, let me know, and
Speaker 1: you know, we'll let the best argument win. But this
Speaker 1: country cannot be destroyed from the outside, literally cannot be.
Speaker 1: It's not physically possible. God forbid. Some enemy could nuke
Speaker 1: every city in this country, and this nation would only
Speaker 1: be brought closer together. It can only be destroyed by
Speaker 1: the in from the inside. And if you want to
Speaker 1: destroy it from the inside, the quickest way to do
Speaker 1: that is the kind of lawfare that the Biden administration
Speaker 1: and the left unleashed. The very quickest way to destroy
Speaker 1: this country. Two different justice systems undermine rule of law.
Speaker 1: That's how you just destroy the United States of America.
Speaker 1: So Trump winning is about so much more than even
Speaker 1: the very importance of Trump winning. It saved the country
Speaker 1: from this because you could be sure one thing, right,
Speaker 1: if the left had succeeded with this lawfair against Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: with this corruption of the system.
Speaker 2: This undermining of America, you would see.
Speaker 1: It from the left at every single level, everywhere, including
Speaker 1: in Colorado. You would have it being abused today all
Speaker 1: over Colorado. If it had worked for the left against
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. So the country once again, as it did
Speaker 1: in sixteen, it saved itself Donald Trump once again by
Speaker 1: getting elected, save the country from something even bigger than
Speaker 1: these individually terrible leftist policies. So when we come back
Speaker 1: so much more just it will be, it will be
Speaker 1: everlasting sound from Trump and that presser yesterday. He had
Speaker 1: his A plus game, but then really want to dig
Speaker 1: into the issues raised. Can have a special guest right
Speaker 1: after the break on my penetrating question, should Aurora sue
Speaker 1: Denver over the dumping of folks here ilegally in Aurora.
Speaker 1: You're on the Dankpla Show.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Glad you are here talking about literally seven different things
Speaker 1: right now, most of them local, but playing Trump sound
Speaker 1: throughout the show from that amazing presser yesterday. It portends
Speaker 1: great things for the four years to come and does
Speaker 1: some of the big issues raised there. But very pleased
Speaker 1: to go to the VIP line. Welcome a truly courageous person.
Speaker 1: This video that swept America and just brought into living
Speaker 1: rooms across this nation the reality of the costs, the
Speaker 1: way too high cost of these wide open borders. Was
Speaker 1: video that Cindy Romero deserves credit for a courageous resident
Speaker 1: of one of those apartment complexes in Aurora, and she
Speaker 1: brought that video to the media so the public could
Speaker 1: see the reality of TDA and the reality of the
Speaker 1: terrorism that was going on right here in America in
Speaker 1: this case in Aurora, which then leads to this question,
Speaker 1: should Aurora suit Denver? Because maryork Kaufman has now written
Speaker 1: a piece for the Gazette laying out his case.
Speaker 2: Is his case that.
Speaker 1: Denver uh secretly dumped all sorts of immigrants into Aurora,
Speaker 1: didn't tell Aurora what they were doing, harmed Aurora greatly
Speaker 1: in the process. Should Aurora suit Denver? Sendy Romero, Welcome
Speaker 1: back to the dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 5: Hi, Hi, how are you doing well?
Speaker 2: I'm doing well. How are you doing?
Speaker 5: I'm living a dream day by day. I'm just trying
Speaker 5: to here.
Speaker 1: I love that. And so, Sindy, what's your take on this?
Speaker 1: Should Aurora suit Denver? I mean, you know, if there
Speaker 1: is a cause of action, But should Aurora.
Speaker 5: Suit Denver if they can find president for it? I
Speaker 5: feel like absolutely, I feel like Denver's responsible. I have
Speaker 5: been very vocal that I blame both mayors and I
Speaker 5: blame the governor. For allowing it to continue to happen.
Speaker 5: The city manager in Aurora, of course, never came out
Speaker 5: and did anything forward about preventing this. They knew about
Speaker 5: it almost a full year before I reported it. It's
Speaker 5: a very unique situation where I believe the mayor of
Speaker 5: Denver was responsible and knowingly pushed these people into Aurora
Speaker 5: and surrounding counties and then denied the spread, and then
Speaker 5: has the nerve to come out and say, you know,
Speaker 5: Mayor Craft, and I don't know why you have problems
Speaker 5: with gangs. We don't have those problems in Denver.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So insidious.
Speaker 1: And then also with lawless Mike Johnston, the mayor of Denver,
Speaker 1: coming out and just hotlier than now, bragging about we
Speaker 1: welcome newcomers, we embrace our newcomers. Yeah, and then they
Speaker 1: dump a bunch of newcomers off on Aurora.
Speaker 2: It's out even telling Aurora.
Speaker 5: And aren't taking care of them. They may have placed
Speaker 5: them there, they may have supported pushing them there, but
Speaker 5: now they're not supporting them at all. They're not helping.
Speaker 5: See these people who are in the building, still starving
Speaker 5: and being victims of game.
Speaker 1: Well, but wait to say my starting point and I
Speaker 1: bet you'd agree, is that it's morally wrong. I guess
Speaker 1: the court's left to test if aurorasus whether it's legally wrong.
Speaker 1: But it's morally wrong, it's fundamentally dishonest. It tells you
Speaker 1: very bad things about lawless Mike Johnston and others involved
Speaker 1: in this on the left.
Speaker 2: That they would do that, that they would do it secretly.
Speaker 1: Listen, if you're going to do it, then just tell
Speaker 1: everybody you're doing it. Then Aurora can prepare for it.
Speaker 1: Aurora can try to fight it and stop it, you know, politically,
Speaker 1: maybe legally, but then Aurora can prepare for it. The
Speaker 1: residents can be warned about it. Everybody can, you know,
Speaker 1: do their best, make their own best decisions to try
Speaker 1: to to protect their own situation. But instead they do
Speaker 1: this deceptively. And you know, people lie for a reason.
Speaker 1: Right when I say that to jury's, hey, I catch
Speaker 1: somebody in line say people lie for a reason. Every
Speaker 1: head nods. People know it's true. They kept the mayor
Speaker 1: of Denver kept this secret. If Mayor Kaufman's correct, and
Speaker 1: his column convinces me Johnston kept its secret for a reason, right.
Speaker 5: Yes, And he's still not making any comment about it
Speaker 5: other than that's your problem, Aurora, y'all better fix it.
Speaker 5: He's not making any kind of you know, outcry. Well,
Speaker 5: of course, if they need help, we're here to help.
Speaker 5: They caused the problem, he's just not accepting any responsibility
Speaker 5: for it. Not that I hold Mayor Kaufman any less
Speaker 5: responsible because he refused to acknowledge the problem. And the
Speaker 5: part of this is getting ahead of it. Do you
Speaker 5: acknowledge the problem so you can fix it? And they're
Speaker 5: still not fixing it. And that's what's the problem for me.
Speaker 5: And that's why I'm going to keep continuing to go
Speaker 5: meet these mayors out in public. Every time they come
Speaker 5: to speak to the public. I'm going to come and
Speaker 5: I'm going to be there and be there to question
Speaker 5: them and press them on acknowledging the problem. I'm tired
Speaker 5: of this being swept under the rug. This is affecting
Speaker 5: too many people now well needs to be acknowledged so
Speaker 5: we can fix it.
Speaker 2: And Cindy, you can.
Speaker 1: You can speak with more credibility on this than anybody
Speaker 1: because you took real personal risk in order to protect
Speaker 1: others by making this public. So you come to the
Speaker 1: table with great credibility and then you know, obviously you
Speaker 1: have others who are just trying to protect their turf,
Speaker 1: and Johnston the worst of the lot, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: because to me, what that reflects that Mike Johnston did,
Speaker 1: it reflects just a profound lack of respect for human life,
Speaker 1: because if you truly respected human life, and he so
Speaker 1: insidiously pretends to be holier than now right when when
Speaker 1: he shows such disrespect for human life, because if he,
Speaker 1: if he cared about life, he would advise everybody what
Speaker 1: was going on. He would make sure that everybody had
Speaker 1: that opportunity to protect themselves. But for Mike Johnston, it's
Speaker 1: all about Mike Johnston, and he wanted that trouble out
Speaker 1: of Denver and into Aurora, no matter who it ended
Speaker 1: up getting hurt.
Speaker 5: Well, he was focused on solving his homelessness problems with
Speaker 5: billing his promises, and I understand that, but he caused
Speaker 5: so many other people to be victimized in the pursuit
Speaker 5: of throwing money at homelessness like that is the you know,
Speaker 5: the ultimate solution to it, which I disagree. And I
Speaker 5: see that these people are a burden on Aurora because
Speaker 5: they're living rent free, they're not paying taxes, they're not.
Speaker 5: They don't have jobs. They're taking from the community and
Speaker 5: committing crimes like it's not a war. Taxpayer's responsibility to
Speaker 5: continue to pay for these people, and it's horrible that
Speaker 5: they're being left there to fend for themselves. With the
Speaker 5: immigration policies of our previous administration, they only have so
Speaker 5: many choices, and if they can't find a way to citizenship,
Speaker 5: which we know now, you know ninety percent of them
Speaker 5: aren't going to find a way to citizenship. They they're
Speaker 5: stuck here. Now, someone needs to do something. I feel
Speaker 5: like it's a lack of character on both the mayor's
Speaker 5: part to just keep denying that it is a problem.
Speaker 1: Well, Cindy, thanks in large part to you stepping up,
Speaker 1: they won't be able to deny it when the Trump
Speaker 1: administration shows up to enforce the law and starts by saying, Hey,
Speaker 1: anybody here illegally committing other crimes, we're getting you out
Speaker 1: of the country. Anybody here illegally who's been adjudicated, we're
Speaker 1: getting out of the country. Obviously, thanks to you, the
Speaker 1: Trump administration very focused on TDA, and so they won't
Speaker 1: be able to deny that. But hey, so grateful for
Speaker 1: your time again and all of your efforts, and I
Speaker 1: hope we talk again soon.
Speaker 5: Yeah, thank you so much for having me. You have
Speaker 5: a wonderful daddy.
Speaker 2: And Cindy, how can are you on social media? How
Speaker 2: do people follow you?
Speaker 5: You can follow me n C two sixty six on X.
Speaker 2: Hey what is that again?
Speaker 1: N C six All right, thanks, Cindy appreciated. That is
Speaker 1: Cindy Romero. Yes, she was the one who captured that
Speaker 1: video that brought this really important truth to the world.
Speaker 1: And of course, what does Jared Polis do? He comes
Speaker 1: out and denies it, says, oh no, that's that's a
Speaker 1: figment of Danielle Jerinsky's imagination until this video prove Polis
Speaker 1: is doing what Polis so often does, right, which is
Speaker 1: perfect timing for this.
Speaker 8: And you're saying, we're addressing them, and that's what you're
Speaker 8: upset about, Madam Speaker. I want you amount of speaker
Speaker 8: to address me. The reason that.
Speaker 5: They are here.
Speaker 8: They are here because our government is tearing apart their families.
Speaker 1: Madam Speaker, Well, gentlemen from Colorado understand all member of.
Speaker 9: The Speaker understand that the speaker is obstructing HR fifteen
Speaker 9: from coming to the floor, will speak, Will a speaker
Speaker 9: understand that Tony leaders, Will the speaker understand.
Speaker 2: That gentleman be proceeed?
Speaker 8: Will the speaker understand that the speaker is preventing Hr
Speaker 8: fifteen from.
Speaker 4: Coming to the floor.
Speaker 8: And that is why there are men and women in
Speaker 8: the gallery that potentially face deportation and their families are
Speaker 8: being torn apart.
Speaker 2: It's very simple. It's very simple, very simple, Madam Speaker,
Speaker 2: do you think he was on something?
Speaker 1: I mean, that is probably the single most sexist thing
Speaker 1: that's happened on the floor of the House in modern
Speaker 1: American history, done by Jared Polis. That was a female
Speaker 1: not now deceeased congresswoman who was serving a Speaker of
Speaker 1: the House, and just in the tone, the abusiveness, everything
Speaker 1: he did there, the sexism just oozed right. And that's
Speaker 1: Jared Polus. What does that tell you?
Speaker 2: You're on the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 6: You want to get back those hostages for and for us.
Speaker 7: You know, we do have people that a hostage is
Speaker 7: being held. And I'll just say it again, if this
Speaker 7: deal is not done with the people representing our nation
Speaker 7: by the time I get to office, all hell is
Speaker 7: going to break out.
Speaker 1: You see that report today, I'm not sure it's accurate
Speaker 1: that there may only be twenty hostages still alive.
Speaker 4: I'd be surprised if there's that many alive.
Speaker 1: Frankly, yeah, I mean, you talk about Satan, right, and
Speaker 1: I don't think there's any doubt that the devil is real.
Speaker 1: And then you look at people who just and groups
Speaker 1: that just act the same way that Satan would, and
Speaker 1: obviously put Hamas and how it butchered Israel into that category.
Speaker 1: And then the question that we've been kicking around since.
Speaker 1: A caller called yesterday and educated us on some Rolling
Speaker 1: Stones lyrics that are glorifying slavery and sexual torture of slaves.
Speaker 1: You know, is that band Satanic? So eight f five
Speaker 1: for zero five A two five five the number one
Speaker 1: of the many topics on the table today. Another one
Speaker 1: is and Cindy Romero joined us a few minutes ago.
Speaker 1: She was a brave woman who was able to capture
Speaker 1: that video showing the reality of TDA taking over that
Speaker 1: apartment complex, and it educated the nation. I have no
Speaker 1: doubt that it helped Trump in the election. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying it's the reason he won, but it opened the
Speaker 1: nation's eyes to the price being paid through these wide
Speaker 1: open borders. And Trump then launches Operation Aurora, as you heard.
Speaker 1: But it raises the question now that Mike Kaufman saying
Speaker 1: he has proof that Denver secretly dumped a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of migrants into Aurora without telling Aurora and then used
Speaker 1: the allegation is these non governmental organizations to accomplish it.
Speaker 1: Should Denver have to pay reparations to Aurora? Does Aurora
Speaker 1: have a good lawsuit against Denver? Texter says Dan It
Speaker 1: sounds like Denver is a malpractice suit against them. It's
Speaker 1: like a doctor that notices you have a cancer but
Speaker 1: says nothing about it until a whole year later, and
Speaker 1: now it's infested your body. I think the better comparison, respectfully,
Speaker 1: would be a doctor who places that cancer into somebody
Speaker 1: and then doesn't tell them. Now, of course, I've never
Speaker 1: heard of a doctor doing that, and I know I
Speaker 1: can't believe a doctor ever would, But that's what Mayor
Speaker 1: Kaufman is accusing Denver of doing. And I'm not saying
Speaker 1: that every person here, ilegally, every migrant or anything like
Speaker 1: that is a cancer. That's not the point. The point
Speaker 1: is that when you take a group of people who
Speaker 1: have just come into this country due to your party,
Speaker 1: lawless Mike's party, Mike Johnston's party, and they've just come
Speaker 1: into this country, they don't have any way to support themselves,
Speaker 1: and then you secretly dump them on another city. It's
Speaker 1: not the individuals who constitute the cancer, it's the dynamic
Speaker 1: that constitutes the cancer and the danger in this case
Speaker 1: to Aurora. So I don't know whether there is a
Speaker 1: valid legal cause.
Speaker 2: Of action there.
Speaker 1: I hope there is, because in a just society, Denver
Speaker 1: should have to pay Aurora for this. Kevin in Boulder,
Speaker 1: you're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome.
Speaker 6: Hey there, Hey, you know you misquoted me today? All right,
Speaker 6: all I call my lawyers calls.
Speaker 2: Ryan, do we have my lawyer available?
Speaker 4: I'll check?
Speaker 2: Okay, okay, Kevin?
Speaker 6: What is it some of your calls? Being trained legally myself,
Speaker 6: I maybe I'm more likely to catch things, But with
Speaker 6: a lot of calls, I can tell when you're using
Speaker 6: your legal lawyerly training in the statements you make or
Speaker 6: the questions you ask. But then there's calls where it's
Speaker 6: like you're not using that.
Speaker 2: Can you be a little more specific, Well.
Speaker 6: You malign people or make statements about them that you
Speaker 6: have no way of knowing are true.
Speaker 2: Like what what?
Speaker 6: Well? You accuse me of being a tax evader last year?
Speaker 2: What the hell are you talking about?
Speaker 6: One thing about it?
Speaker 2: Kevin? What are you talking about?
Speaker 6: I mean today, when I called about run Sugar, who
Speaker 6: is this guy? Did I say it was a song
Speaker 6: about rape or sexual torture of women? I said it
Speaker 6: was a song about the history of slavery. Could you
Speaker 6: do your listeners a favor and Wikipedia's Sympathy for the
Speaker 6: Devil and read us the true meaning as told by
Speaker 6: Mick Jagger who wrote it.
Speaker 1: Now, Kevin, let me ask you are these lyrics? Can
Speaker 1: they be interpreted in any other way than glorifying the
Speaker 1: sexual torture of women? By the way, By the way, Kevin,
Speaker 1: I was trying to give you credit for alerting me
Speaker 1: to the reality of those lyrics.
Speaker 2: You don't want to take the credit?
Speaker 6: False credit?
Speaker 2: Okay, well credit, Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you here.
Speaker 6: Let me pull up the lyrics glorify Could you define glorifies? Usually?
Speaker 5: Sure?
Speaker 2: Promote in doors?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 2: That that would be.
Speaker 6: No way of knowing that they were promoting or endorsement.
Speaker 6: Of course, you do much worse things in it than Brownchie.
Speaker 2: Of course you do, my friend, and you know you do.
Speaker 2: You want me to respond.
Speaker 1: I guess you don't want me to respond because you
Speaker 1: know I defeat your argument, and that is.
Speaker 6: It's because you're making nonsense. You want your listeners to
Speaker 6: believe what you're saying. What I'm saying is.
Speaker 2: You're making my point by interrupting me and stopping me.
Speaker 6: Do that with almost every caller.
Speaker 1: So Kevin, Kevin, No, no, no, let's know. I care about you.
Speaker 1: I want to get to the bottom of this. What
Speaker 1: is wrong with you?
Speaker 5: What?
Speaker 2: Why do you have this agitation? Why? Why do you see.
Speaker 6: You're using your lawyerly training to turn the table on me,
Speaker 6: make your listeners think crazy or something.
Speaker 1: I don't have to do that for you. I don't
Speaker 1: have to do that. But here are the lyrics. Tell
Speaker 1: me how these are anything other than endorsing, glorifying, and promotive.
Speaker 1: All right, I'm gonna I'm gonna have to put him
Speaker 1: on pause because he knows he's about to be defeated
Speaker 1: and he's never gonna stop talking lyrics. Yeah, Gold Coast
Speaker 1: slave ship bound for cotton fields sold in a market
Speaker 1: down in New Orleans. Scarred old slaver. Know he's doing
Speaker 1: all right. Hear him whip the women just around midnight?
Speaker 1: Brown sugar? How come you taste so good brown sugar,
Speaker 1: just like a young girl should so, Kevin explained to us.
Speaker 1: How that is anything other than glorifying slavery, rape and
Speaker 1: sexual torture.
Speaker 6: Look it up online, Go away, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: Come on, this is an adult program.
Speaker 1: You want to call this show and have an intelligen discussion,
Speaker 1: Let's have it.
Speaker 2: Let there be a battle of ideas.
Speaker 1: But this childish little game of constantly interrupting or avoiding
Speaker 1: direct questions. I never avoid direct questions. I've been on
Speaker 1: air almost thirty years, maybe more than thirty years. If
Speaker 1: you asked me a tough direct question, I'll answer it.
Speaker 1: People unwilling to do that, they're wasting all of our time.
Speaker 1: You're on the Dan Kaplas Show.