Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. I apologize for
Speaker 1: taking the suspense out of the presidential race. I'm going
Speaker 1: to do it again today, So spoiler alert on that
Speaker 1: and everything I've told you what happen in this race
Speaker 1: has happened. Biden is not the nominee. The race has
Speaker 1: gotten tougher for Trump because Biden's not the nominee. Trump
Speaker 1: is still highly likely to win, and it goes on
Speaker 1: from there. But I cannot wait to talk to you
Speaker 1: about this today because you know, timing's everything right, and
Speaker 1: Amy and I thirty years of incredible bliss. And so
Speaker 1: we get to that thirty year point, we plan this
Speaker 1: big trip. We planned to go right at the end
Speaker 1: of the GOP convention, and then, of course what happens
Speaker 1: is that's when the political coup reached its climax and
Speaker 1: they overthrow Biden as the democratically elected nominee, and all
Speaker 1: of this kicks in. So I've got a whole week
Speaker 1: of stored up thoughts and observations and questions, et cetera
Speaker 1: for you today. So looking forward to it eight five
Speaker 1: to five for zero five eight two five to five
Speaker 1: the number text d an five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: I know there are other things going on in the world,
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about those, how do we
Speaker 1: not talk about even more proof of the undeniable war
Speaker 1: on Christianity. It's going on on so many different levels
Speaker 1: across the world, starting with mass slaughter of Christians in
Speaker 1: certain countries that at this point just seems to be
Speaker 1: a big yawner for most of the world. But we
Speaker 1: see this persecution of Christians in so many other ways
Speaker 1: as well, and obviously on full display at the Olympics.
Speaker 1: And that's what we're going to talk about in part today.
Speaker 1: Though you know, the question I guess on that one,
Speaker 1: and we'll get to it later in the show, is
Speaker 1: what do you do about it? Right? I mean, it
Speaker 1: confirms the reality of what's going on out there that
Speaker 1: we talk about on the show and so many other
Speaker 1: context and it's certainly the secular left in America, which
Speaker 1: owns and operates the Democratic Party is is overtly hostile
Speaker 1: to Christianity in so many different ways, and then to
Speaker 1: other certain religions as well. But Christianity, you know, receives
Speaker 1: that the brunt of their abuse. Because Jared Polus acknowledged it,
Speaker 1: Barack Obama acknowledged it. The left knows they have to
Speaker 1: separate people from their christian faith and from certain other faces. Well,
Speaker 1: they have to separate people from their faith in order
Speaker 1: for the left to get its way, because so much
Speaker 1: of the Left wants to do is directly contrary to
Speaker 1: the fundamental teachings of Christianity and some other religions also
Speaker 1: eight five to five for zero five eight two five
Speaker 1: five texts DA N five seven seven three nine. So
Speaker 1: at reaching the point where in the opening ceremonies there
Speaker 1: would be the worst form of mocking of the Last Supper. Yeah,
Speaker 1: just confirms everything we've been talking about in that front.
Speaker 1: But you know that brings us back to the presidential race, right,
Speaker 1: because in so many different ways, this presidential race is
Speaker 1: about what kind of America we're going to have for
Speaker 1: decades to come, including on the religious freedom front. So
Speaker 1: let's let's take into his political coup, the deposing of
Speaker 1: democratically elected dem nominee Joe Biden. But where it leaves
Speaker 1: the race, and I particularly like to hear from you.
Speaker 1: If you disagree, we'll open up those phone lines for you.
Speaker 1: Eight five to five four zero five eight two five
Speaker 1: five the number text D A N five seven seven
Speaker 1: thirty nine. But when it comes to the race, I'd
Speaker 1: been talking about for a long time on this show,
Speaker 1: and it's proven to write when it comes to the race,
Speaker 1: of course, you know, when Biden eventually was removed as
Speaker 1: the nominee, it was going to get tougher for Trump
Speaker 1: because Trump was absolutely, without question going to beat Biden.
Speaker 1: Biden was politically dead man walking. Can't get much easier
Speaker 1: than that. But that raises the interesting question in the end,
Speaker 1: will Kamala Harris actually be easier to beat than Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Obviously they're getting this sugar high right now, but that's
Speaker 1: before people start to really learn a lot more about
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris and what she really believes and what a
Speaker 1: presidency would look like, and her capabilities or much more
Speaker 1: importantly lack thereof, to be president of the United States.
Speaker 1: So the way I see this thing right now is
Speaker 1: that is that it shapes up so well for Trump
Speaker 1: and the GOP because think about this. I'm sure you
Speaker 1: have think about this. This is the worst possible scenario
Speaker 1: for the Democrats after or the deposing of Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: because if after the inevitable removal of Biden is the nominee,
Speaker 1: if after that the Dems had gone with any combination
Speaker 1: of their other options, they would be in a much
Speaker 1: much stronger place than they are with Kamala Harris as
Speaker 1: the nominee, no matter who she picks his VP, they'd
Speaker 1: be in a much stronger place. But this comes back
Speaker 1: to another thing that I've been respectfully submitting to you
Speaker 1: for a long time, and I think people have to
Speaker 1: acknowledge it is true because I don't think anybody can
Speaker 1: credibly argue against it, and that is Joe Biden wants
Speaker 1: He wants the Democrats to lose. He don't want Trump
Speaker 1: to win. He despises Trump, he hates Trump. But he's
Speaker 1: willing to have Trump win in order to accomplish his goal,
Speaker 1: which is having the people who overthrew him lose, having
Speaker 1: the people who ousted him lose, having the people who
Speaker 1: humiliated him lose, all of the above being within his
Speaker 1: own party. So of course he wants them to lose.
Speaker 1: Of course, he with his worldview and all centered around
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. Of course he wants to be the only
Speaker 1: candidate to have beaten Trump. Hillary Clinton couldn't do it, right,
Speaker 1: And remember Obama ran him out of the race in
Speaker 1: favor of Hillary in sixteen. Hillary Clinton couldn't do it.
Speaker 1: You think, I think for a second Biden wants Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris to beat Trump. Now not a chance. So that's
Speaker 1: the beautiful thing is is the Biden camp was able
Speaker 1: to outmaneuver Obama and they were able to rig all
Speaker 1: of this so that once it was clear he was
Speaker 1: going to be overthrown as a democratically elected nominee, they
Speaker 1: got Harris inserted, They got Harris ensconced, they got Harris
Speaker 1: off to a fast start. So at that point the
Speaker 1: party stuck with Harris. And that is so very good
Speaker 1: in ways I want to talk with you about during
Speaker 1: the course of the show. But that is so very
Speaker 1: good for Trumpet and the gop down ticket, and so
Speaker 1: much better than any of these other combinations would have been.
Speaker 1: And how rich to see Obama and that whole pack
Speaker 1: that deposed Biden. How beautiful to see them out maneuvered
Speaker 1: here and they're stuck with Harris. I mean, it's not subtle, right.
Speaker 1: Barack Obama did not endorse her. I know, yes now
Speaker 1: because he had to, But Michelle Obama did not endorse her.
Speaker 1: They know what's coming, they know how weak she's going
Speaker 1: to be. And I ask you this as we head
Speaker 1: into a break, I'd ask you if you're disagreeing with
Speaker 1: me at this point, without closing your eyes, if you're driving,
Speaker 1: just stop and think about it. Can you really picture
Speaker 1: can you really picture the United States of America electing
Speaker 1: a San Francisco left d president of the United States?
Speaker 1: And that's before we get to a whole bunch of
Speaker 1: other stuff. But can you actually picture this nation doing that?
Speaker 1: And think back on wait a second. The Dems who
Speaker 1: have won, you know, they won by pretending to be moderate.
Speaker 1: She can't do that. She came out of California, she
Speaker 1: came out of that that lefty incubator. She ran as Harden,
Speaker 1: as far to the left as she could for a
Speaker 1: very long time. And she has done that as VP
Speaker 1: as well. I mean, so go back and ask yourself.
Speaker 1: I mean, would Barack Obama have won in oh eight
Speaker 1: if he had been an openly far left San Francisco liberal.
Speaker 1: Would Barack Obama have won in two thousand and eight,
Speaker 1: even with all of those wins in his favor wi
Speaker 1: DS in his favor, what would he have won in
Speaker 1: two thousand and eight? You know, Biden very very narrowly
Speaker 1: won by pretending to be a moderate. And keep in mind,
Speaker 1: the reason that the Democratic Party launched on to Biden
Speaker 1: and propped him up as their nominee in twenty was
Speaker 1: that the Democratic Party was convinced America would not vote
Speaker 1: for Bernie Sanders, would not vote for any open lefty.
Speaker 1: He wouldn't even vote for Buddha Judge or any Klobachar.
Speaker 1: And so they America, the Democratic Party, so convinced America
Speaker 1: would only elect what they perceived to be a moderate Democrat.
Speaker 1: That's how they ran Biden. So, yeah, just step back
Speaker 1: and look at it and say, can you really picture
Speaker 1: America electing a far left San Francisco liberal as President
Speaker 1: of the United States? Eight five four zero five eight
Speaker 1: two five to five The number text d A N
Speaker 1: five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 2: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 3: I'm stupid, you're smart, I was wrong, you were right,
Speaker 3: You're the best.
Speaker 1: I'm the worst. You're very good looking.
Speaker 4: I'm not attractive, all right, as long as you're willing
Speaker 4: to admit that.
Speaker 5: Now, are you ready to get down to business and
Speaker 5: do exactly what I tell you to do? Good?
Speaker 1: One?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 6: That was good?
Speaker 1: Watch that movie every day?
Speaker 4: Well it was almost the exchange you and I had
Speaker 4: about the prediction that ended with a Tomahawk's steak in
Speaker 4: your favor.
Speaker 1: Well, thank you, my friend, and I'm very much looking
Speaker 1: forward to schedule that getting together with you for a tomawk.
Speaker 1: But I am buying my own tomak. No, it's a
Speaker 1: moral victory. I would just feel guilty. I'd feel terrible.
Speaker 1: All right, Well, you got watch it because we're buddies.
Speaker 1: That's just because we're buddies.
Speaker 4: I still think of bets about You deserve it, you
Speaker 4: earned it.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. The sound you just played is more
Speaker 1: important to me than any piece of me that might be. Yeah, yeah, absolutely, Hey,
Speaker 1: if you just joined us, thank you, and thanks so
Speaker 1: much to Heidi Ganal and John Calterera for manning the
Speaker 1: show last week while Amy and I were off celebrating
Speaker 1: our thirtieth anniversary together. Since the times she was a
Speaker 1: little kid, you know, Sound of Music whenever it came
Speaker 1: out was her favorite movie, and so we just it
Speaker 1: was just great to go over there and wander around
Speaker 1: some of those parts and it was fantastic. And thanks
Speaker 1: to Heidi for letting me co host the show last
Speaker 1: Monday night. But given the time change it because it's
Speaker 1: about what twelve thirty am on my body clock right now,
Speaker 1: so this will be a particularly good show today eight
Speaker 1: fy y five for zero five eight two five five
Speaker 1: text d an five seven seven three nine. But I'm
Speaker 1: back in the studio now, so happy to be here.
Speaker 1: And it's not just so like, hey, I was right
Speaker 1: about this, right about that. The point is in that
Speaker 1: it isn't a personal thing. It isn't an ego thing.
Speaker 1: It's say, hey, you know, I hope I have some
Speaker 1: credibility with you because of that thing, because I think
Speaker 1: I have a clear view of what's coming next. I
Speaker 1: want you to give that some serious consideration. Eight five
Speaker 1: to five four zero five eight two five to five.
Speaker 1: So we'll get to the phone lines Prano. But I
Speaker 1: opened the show by talking about some of this. There's
Speaker 1: so much more to talk about, but so many upsides
Speaker 1: to Trump and the GOP of having Kamala Harris as
Speaker 1: the nominee, and no more danger of complacency, right because
Speaker 1: Trump had won. Trump had won this race against the
Speaker 1: democratically nominated Democratic Party nominee. Trump had won the race,
Speaker 1: and now it's going to be tougher no matter who
Speaker 1: they put in there, but it's going to be easier
Speaker 1: against Kamala than it would have been against anybody else
Speaker 1: in their top tier that they could have run. So
Speaker 1: now no more danger of complacency. And Trump was building
Speaker 1: up such a big lead that there was starting to
Speaker 1: be a danger of complacency that you heard some listeners
Speaker 1: properly referring to Kamala the worst possible candidate of all
Speaker 1: the realistically possible DEM candidates, the worst possible candidate in
Speaker 1: the blue Wall states. And will break that down a
Speaker 1: little bit more as we go through it, but let's
Speaker 1: start with this one. As I start to mix in
Speaker 1: calls and texts, Democrats, right, they have to win all
Speaker 1: three of the blue Wall states by most realistic calculations.
Speaker 1: Catholic voters a major presence, a major factor in the
Speaker 1: Blue Wall states of Ohio's already in the GOP camp.
Speaker 1: But you talk about Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Catholic voters loom
Speaker 1: very large. Whoever wins the Catholic vote normally wins the presidency.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was able to hold on to a significant
Speaker 1: chunk of the Catholic vote through his quote unquote devout
Speaker 1: Catholic pitch and the fact that he was he self
Speaker 1: identified as a Catholic. So, Kamala Harris, as you look
Speaker 1: at the entire Democrat field, can anybody suggest to me
Speaker 1: any major Democrat player who would be worse when it
Speaker 1: comes to the Catholic vote. Kamala Harris is going to
Speaker 1: lose the Catholic vote, gonna lose the Catholic vote big.
Speaker 1: The Catholic vote may collapse the Catholic vote for the
Speaker 1: Democratic nominee. I'm not saying she won't get any but
Speaker 1: but it may. It may collapse with Kamala Harris leading
Speaker 1: the ticket. And we'll get into the particular wise and
Speaker 1: if you disagree with me, I'd love to have that
Speaker 1: conversation as well. Let's start with Eerie Mike here on
Speaker 1: the Dan Kaplo Show. How you doing, Arie.
Speaker 5: Hey doing just great?
Speaker 6: Denver Hey, I just you asked for a different point
Speaker 6: of view and so I'm gonna offer that up to you.
Speaker 6: So I think miss Harris Well, first of all, by
Speaker 6: the way, she's not a San Francisco.
Speaker 5: And those are two very different cities.
Speaker 1: She's not a San Francisco liberal.
Speaker 5: No, she's an Oakland liberal.
Speaker 1: How did how did well? My brother? Please educate me,
Speaker 1: my friend, because you know I've just come back from vacation.
Speaker 1: I may have vacation brain. How did she get elected
Speaker 1: that the San Francisco.
Speaker 6: DA She's from Oakland. I'm sure she worked.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, no, worked in San Francisco. She was elected the
Speaker 1: district attorney in San Francisco. And you call this show
Speaker 1: to say she's not a San Francisco liberal.
Speaker 6: I'm just trying to put San Francisco.
Speaker 1: And do you think in the minds of the voters
Speaker 1: in the blue Wall states? And by the way, if
Speaker 1: you're new to the show, we love Mike for this.
Speaker 1: This is what he does. Once you prove him wrong
Speaker 1: on a point, he just keeps talking. Uh so go ahead,
Speaker 1: my friend. So yes, And and you think then in
Speaker 1: the blue Wall States, those voters are going to make
Speaker 1: a distinction. Oh no, she's not a San Francisco liberal.
Speaker 1: Even though she was San Francisco DA. She's an Oakland Liberal,
Speaker 1: and that's going to make a difference.
Speaker 6: No, I'm just trying to correct you, that's all You'll
Speaker 6: You failed.
Speaker 1: You fail, Mike.
Speaker 4: I'm trying to find how her being from Oakland, which
Speaker 4: she's not. But let's go with that. Mike, how is
Speaker 4: that relevant?
Speaker 5: What does that mean?
Speaker 2: What does that mean?
Speaker 1: Well?
Speaker 6: Here, well, here's the more relevant point I was getting to.
Speaker 6: I was just trying to I was just trying to
Speaker 6: let you know that you were incorrect.
Speaker 1: But wait a second, Wait, wait a second, Mike, I
Speaker 1: got to put you on pause because We've reached a
Speaker 1: point where I wonder whether I'm still in a flight
Speaker 1: somewhere into deep sleep having a bad dream. Mike. You
Speaker 1: called to say, Dan, you're wrong. She's not a San
Speaker 1: Francisco liberal. I said, Mike, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: she was the elected DA from San Francisco. And you
Speaker 1: still insist I was wrong. She's not a San Francisco liberal. Mike,
Speaker 1: will will you admit that? No, you were wrong, And
Speaker 1: in fact, she was the elected DA of San Francisco.
Speaker 6: She was definitely the prosecutor, and she's going to be
Speaker 6: running against a criminal and I think that is the
Speaker 6: single point that she can make and me a much
Speaker 6: better Canada than Biden's. Okay, I wanted to.
Speaker 2: Make Okay, well let's let's let's ask you.
Speaker 6: Wrong about her place of birth?
Speaker 1: Okay, that this is just goofy wasted time. Okay, So
Speaker 1: you think she's going to win on the I'm a
Speaker 1: prosecutor and he's a criminal thing. If you're right about that,
Speaker 1: then why has he been expanding his lead after that
Speaker 1: bogus criminal conviction? No, no, no, no, no, you got
Speaker 1: you got to answer that, or this just becomes a
Speaker 1: waste of time. One more chance, Mike, one more chance.
Speaker 1: If you're right about that, why has Trump been expanding
Speaker 1: his lead after the bogus criminal conviction?
Speaker 6: He is, he has.
Speaker 5: Not expanded lead that she joined us.
Speaker 6: As a matter of fact, it's squeezed by five points,
Speaker 6: you know.
Speaker 1: Mike, why don't Why don't you hang on? And there's
Speaker 1: no doubt as I predicted, it would tighten after Biden,
Speaker 1: as I predicted, left the race in this case, was deposed,
Speaker 1: forced out of the race. Welcome back to Mike and
Speaker 1: others who will try to explain how America is going
Speaker 1: to vote for Kamala Harris can't.
Speaker 2: Picture you're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 6: The k File.
Speaker 3: Overnight, Andrew Kazinski and his team found an interview that
Speaker 3: the Vice President, who was then a senator, did in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty, and this was during everything going on around
Speaker 3: George Floyd and the protests there where she talked about
Speaker 3: the defund the police movement, and what she said is
Speaker 3: that the movement was about rightly saying, look at budgets
Speaker 3: and priorities, and I want to play a little bit more.
Speaker 6: What she said, part of what we have to do
Speaker 6: here is also look at the militarization of police departments and.
Speaker 1: The kind of money that is going to that, and
Speaker 1: we need to demilitarize police departments. It is outdated and is.
Speaker 4: Actually wrong and backward to think that more police officers
Speaker 4: will create more safety.
Speaker 1: So this is the type I'm sorry you win the
Speaker 1: election by just playing that on a loop. Take every
Speaker 1: dollar Trump can raise and play that loop over and over.
Speaker 1: How idiotic More police officers equal more safety. No, a
Speaker 1: defund the police Democrat is not going to win in America.
Speaker 1: So it's exactly what I've been telling you for a
Speaker 1: long time. And I know you know this. This is
Speaker 1: all about Donald Trump. It is Donald Trump's to lose.
Speaker 1: It was before the political coup against Biden, and it
Speaker 1: is after. It is Donald Trump's to lose. America is
Speaker 1: not going to vote for Kamala Harris. Now it's up
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump as to whether America votes against Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: It is his to lose. The race is tougher now
Speaker 1: than it was against Biden because Biden was dead politician walking.
Speaker 1: But it is Trump's to lose in so many ways,
Speaker 1: just like back in twenty twenty, As I've said before,
Speaker 1: there were probably maybe ten people in all of America
Speaker 1: who voted for Joe Biden. Unfortunately, there were a few
Speaker 1: too many who voted against Donald Trump. And that's the
Speaker 1: price you pay when you're going to do historically important
Speaker 1: things which can then have the effect of polarizing. And
Speaker 1: I know there was a polarizing aspect on the personality
Speaker 1: as well at points. But when you're gonna do a
Speaker 1: lot of the great tough things that Trump did and
Speaker 1: you're going to have virtually the entire media amassed against you,
Speaker 1: well then yeah, you're going to have a significant portion
Speaker 1: of the voters who are voting against you. But that's
Speaker 1: what happened in twenty Nobody voted for Biden, and you know,
Speaker 1: very few people in the end are going to vote
Speaker 1: for Kamala Harris. Here it would be like it if
Speaker 1: Mike hadn't run off during the break, I'd asked him
Speaker 1: this question. I mean, could you picture America electing dan
Speaker 1: Quayle president? It was never going to happen that. Dan
Speaker 1: Quayle quite obviously seems like a nice guy. I'm sure
Speaker 1: I'd love having a beer with him, but quite obviously
Speaker 1: didn't have the gravitas to be president of the United States.
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris falls into the same category. Didn't Quail Michelle Obama?
Speaker 4: Didn't Quail try to run for like ten minutes in
Speaker 4: nineteen ninety six.
Speaker 1: I'm sure that he did, and you got more votes
Speaker 1: in him be Michelle Obama. Michelle Obama would have been
Speaker 1: the odds on favorite if she got in the race.
Speaker 2: Why do you think she didn't?
Speaker 1: Well, listen, remember Obama, both Obamas, Barack and Michelle did
Speaker 1: not endorse Kamala Harris. They were forced into it later.
Speaker 4: Do you think they were talking about it for about
Speaker 4: four or five days there?
Speaker 6: Oh?
Speaker 1: I think for a lot more than that. But listen,
Speaker 1: whether they didn't endorse Kamala Harris because Michelle intended to run.
Speaker 1: I'm not at all sure she intended to run. I mean, particularly,
Speaker 1: as I said at the time, after President Trump so
Speaker 1: courageously and calmly handled the assassination attempt and showed such
Speaker 1: great leadership at that point, if Michelle Obama had been
Speaker 1: seriously considering running, I think at that point she's out
Speaker 1: because there's no way she wants her legacy being losing
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump. And so the other reason that they
Speaker 1: were not endorsing or right, Ryan, let's assume Michelle Obama
Speaker 1: had no interest in running, then clearly the reasons the
Speaker 1: Obamas were not going to endorse her were that they know,
Speaker 1: they know how all this works, they know the truth
Speaker 1: about Kamala Harris, they know the things she said and done,
Speaker 1: they know her abilities and lack thereof, and they know
Speaker 1: she is not a winning candidate. I've got to believe
Speaker 1: that's why they didn't endorse her. And I understand they
Speaker 1: were left in a position because, as a Texter says
Speaker 1: to me, kind of challenging me, Dan, you really think
Speaker 1: that Biden was able to outsmart Obama. Well, as I said,
Speaker 1: I think when I opened the show, I think Biden's
Speaker 1: team was able to outsmart and out maneuver the Obamas
Speaker 1: because they clearly and quickly got behind Kamala Harris, and
Speaker 1: they were able to do certain things obviously internally, to
Speaker 1: muster such support for her so quickly that even the
Speaker 1: Obamas had to fold. And that is a gift to us.
Speaker 1: Can you can you imagine if we're sitting here right
Speaker 1: now talking about their new candidate being Michelle Obama or
Speaker 1: their new candidate being a Shapiro Whitmer combination, still winnable
Speaker 1: for Trump, but much much much tougher than beating Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: For zero five A two five five the number as
Speaker 1: we go to the phone lines to those with us
Speaker 1: in the last segment, when when Color Mike ended the
Speaker 1: second segment, I'd asked him to hold on because I
Speaker 1: wanted to respond to his claim that the wait a second.
Speaker 1: The reason Kamala Harris has gained in the polls is
Speaker 1: that she, as a former prosecutor, is now focusing on
Speaker 1: Trump's New York conviction, and that's going to have great traction.
Speaker 1: And that's how she wins, and respectfully, I think that's
Speaker 1: completely ludicrous. I mean, Trump gained consistently in the polls
Speaker 1: after that bogus conviction, and what happened. What happened is
Speaker 1: to be expected. And as I predicted, when Joe Biden
Speaker 1: was no longer the nominee, there was going to be
Speaker 1: a surge of support for whoever the Democratic nominee. Was
Speaker 1: an initial surge of support because they had a pulse,
Speaker 1: because they could put a sentence together, because they weren't
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. Of course there was going to be this searge.
Speaker 1: It has nothing to do with the fact that she's
Speaker 1: taking this line of attack. I hope she takes that
Speaker 1: line of attack every day from now through election Day.
Speaker 1: I'm a prosecutor. I know Trump's cut. I'm a prosecutor.
Speaker 1: He's a felon. I hope she talks about that all
Speaker 1: the time, because you know what Americans are by nature
Speaker 1: fair people, and Americans know we sought reflecting the pulse.
Speaker 1: This is a bogus conviction, and I hope she takes that,
Speaker 1: eh and every day I hope she ties herself as
Speaker 1: closely as possible to that gross abuse and misuse of
Speaker 1: the legal system. In New York to wrongfully ca vic
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. I hope she gets as close to that
Speaker 1: as possible. You could text d A N five seven
Speaker 1: seven three nine. I'll get back to a lot of those.
Speaker 1: Jack in Cheyenne, you're on the dan Kaplas show. Welcome.
Speaker 5: Yeah, agreed? Jack?
Speaker 1: You okay? Should we send help?
Speaker 6: Can you hear me?
Speaker 1: Yes? Jack, I can hear you now. Yes.
Speaker 7: Isn't the reason they couldn't run Michelle Obama because the
Speaker 7: two hundred and fifty million more chests that they have
Speaker 7: is only accessible by Biden and Harris and Obama and
Speaker 7: Michelle Obama couldn't act us. That isn't that the reason
Speaker 7: why they had to run her?
Speaker 1: No, I respectfully would disagree on that, Jack. And here's why,
Speaker 1: As I had said before Biden was deposed, money will
Speaker 1: not be an issue. They can snap their fingers and
Speaker 1: come up with two or three hundred million, and that's
Speaker 1: exactly what they did within relatively a few hours a
Speaker 1: couple of days after after Biden was deposed. Right, So No,
Speaker 1: that kind of I don't think is ever an issue
Speaker 1: for the left, And there is there's a meaningful challenge
Speaker 1: right now to whether Harris is going to be able
Speaker 1: to access that money. In the end, she probably will be,
Speaker 1: but there appears to be a very legitimate challenge to it. No,
Speaker 1: my friend, don't you think the Obamas just looked at
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris and said, America is not going to elect
Speaker 1: her president. She's a San Francisco lefty with very few,
Speaker 1: if any accomplishments, and she's closely tied to all of
Speaker 1: Biden's failures, starting with the biggest issue for voters across
Speaker 1: the board, which is the southern border. The Obamas are
Speaker 1: smart people. They want to win her and they see
Speaker 1: she is not.
Speaker 5: Well. Nay, let me go onto the next thing.
Speaker 8: This whole business was Biden's trying to redirect everything that
Speaker 8: the Supreme Court's doing. The Supreme Court two months ago
Speaker 8: did the Chevron Jeff, and that's huge impact of the
Speaker 8: federal agencies to come out and beat up bully everybody.
Speaker 8: And it's probably the most important thing the Supremes have
Speaker 8: done that I can remember in the last twenty or
Speaker 8: thirty years.
Speaker 5: But there's no mention of that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you're off the top of that, Joe, Oh, yeah, absolutely,
Speaker 1: and Jack appreciate the call on that. Sorry, we have
Speaker 1: to hit this hard break. Listen this big Supreme Court
Speaker 1: thing today. I think it's a yawner for the American people.
Speaker 1: And when we come back, though, I want to tell
Speaker 1: you why I think the fact as insidious as what
Speaker 1: Biden was saying today was why it is so good
Speaker 1: for Trump that Biden was out there making this public appearance.
Speaker 1: You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 2: And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 4: How many of you know a black man who has
Speaker 4: expressed to you that they're committee to voting for Donald Trumps.
Speaker 1: A lot of handsco up here for.
Speaker 2: The brothers who have told you that or said that
Speaker 2: to you. He has the emergence of Kamala Harris changed
Speaker 2: that photos thats wow.
Speaker 1: See that is bombshell And I understand it. It's one
Speaker 1: focus group, right, but it's on ms NBC and it
Speaker 1: features a panel of African Americans and you have all
Speaker 1: these African Americans saying that, no, infect Kamala's in the race,
Speaker 1: isn't changing the support of black people for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: So big questions. First of all, why did MSNBC choose
Speaker 1: to run that? And I think that goes to this
Speaker 1: very interesting text that we received Dan, any chance Kamala
Speaker 1: polls poorly in the next few weeks and they try
Speaker 1: to replace her at the DNC that from Alexa. So
Speaker 1: does MSNBC run that. Does ms NBC run that because
Speaker 1: they have concerns about whether Kamala Harris can win, because
Speaker 1: again that there there is very substanti reason to believe
Speaker 1: that after this sugar high, it's going to be not
Speaker 1: all because she'll get a little bump with the VP,
Speaker 1: maybe she'll get a bump out of the convention, but
Speaker 1: that the overarching trend is going to be downhill for her.
Speaker 4: You could very well be right, Dan, But don't you
Speaker 4: think they're absolutely locked in at this point. It already
Speaker 4: kind of looks like a clown car. If they go
Speaker 4: to a third nominee, that's clown car center.
Speaker 1: You're right, and I'm not predicting that, and I don't
Speaker 1: think that's likely. I just don't think you can completely
Speaker 1: rule it out because look, what's already happened. I mean,
Speaker 1: what's already happened, Ryan is beyond clown car. It's like
Speaker 1: clown semi right, because what's already happened is you just
Speaker 1: had a coup, you just had a political coup. You
Speaker 1: had the democratically elected nominee of a major party forced out,
Speaker 1: forced out in favor of somebody who didn't receive a
Speaker 1: single vote, and the ultimate Chicago smoke filled back room deal.
Speaker 1: And so at that point, when they've crossed those lines,
Speaker 1: what lines wouldn't they cross? Yes, So, because their bet
Speaker 1: right now, their bet right now is that if they
Speaker 1: can prop anybody up, anybody up who has any any
Speaker 1: meaningful appeal and any lasting credibility, even though the credibility
Speaker 1: is built on a lie, as Biden's was, any lasting credibility,
Speaker 1: that they will win because you have a significant number
Speaker 1: of people who don't like Donald Trump. That's their bet, right.
Speaker 1: So if it turns out that Kamala Harris collapses, then
Speaker 1: at that point, I don't think there's any doubt they've
Speaker 1: replaced her. I'm not predicting a replacement. I predicted correctly
Speaker 1: Joe Biden would be deposed. Not predicting a replacement, but
Speaker 1: that scenario is not out of the question, because you know,
Speaker 1: after this, after this honeymoon period, there is so much
Speaker 1: out there.
Speaker 4: But they've I mean, they've already made fools of themselves
Speaker 4: talking about the mainstream media Dan that was the New
Speaker 4: York magazine with Kamala is sitting on a coconut and
Speaker 4: they're trying to make coconut cool or something like that.
Speaker 1: Is I had coconut much fun to watch. And then
Speaker 1: I want to play this as well, this David Hog
Speaker 1: guy who had this interesting comment.
Speaker 9: I think it's important to show that we aren't just
Speaker 9: white dudes for COMMLA, but also that were younger white dudes,
Speaker 9: were older white dudes or people of all ages for Kamala.
Speaker 9: And I also have to note too that this would
Speaker 9: not have been possible. This was inspired by you know,
Speaker 9: following in the footsteps of black women for Kamala, which
Speaker 9: was one of the first calls that was set up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so, so white dudes for Kamala. The point here
Speaker 1: is is keep an eye on the young vote. Okay,
Speaker 1: because I was I was talking too. I was talking
Speaker 1: to a late teens early twenty something yesterday about the
Speaker 1: raising and this this young lady raised the point that
Speaker 1: and this young lady, no supporter of Donald Trump whatsoever,
Speaker 1: quite the opposite, raise the point that there's a lot
Speaker 1: a blowback against Kamala Harris on TikTok And I was
Speaker 1: so surprised to hear that. So and then you see
Speaker 1: these parallel stories running that the Harris campaign is paying
Speaker 1: a lot of influencers to to try to get her
Speaker 1: favorables on ticktak. But yeah, this at TikTok, right. You
Speaker 1: can tell I'm not on it because I called it ticktack.
Speaker 1: I know what it is, and I know the controversy
Speaker 1: around it, but I was just so surprised to hear
Speaker 1: that from somebody who is not a Trump fan and
Speaker 1: is on TikTok all the time, and probably tiktacs as well.
Speaker 4: Maybe, But going back to how you started this segment then,
Speaker 4: and again, we don't put everybody in one silo, but
Speaker 4: there are trends within a particular demographic, and the one
Speaker 4: I've got my eyes on right now is.
Speaker 2: What you touched on black men.
Speaker 4: I don't think black men are going to be running
Speaker 4: out to vote for Kamala Harris in large part. I
Speaker 4: think there's a large cross section of them now that
Speaker 4: likes Donald Trump, that is sick of how the economy's going,
Speaker 4: that maybe they're in a job where they're doing a
Speaker 4: lot worse under By and then they did under Trump,
Speaker 4: and they're going to vote for Trump for a lot
Speaker 4: of reasons that everybody else is and no Kamala Harris
Speaker 4: is going to come in and change that.
Speaker 1: You know, I would love to hear from some of
Speaker 1: our Black listeners about your take on this. My view
Speaker 1: of this is that the much much, much much much
Speaker 1: more powerful dynamics in this race than race, you know,
Speaker 1: are going to be strength versus weakness. I think that's
Speaker 1: going to be the most powerful dynamic in the race
Speaker 1: because you have polar opposites. Right, you have Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: like him or not, and I obviously happened to you know,
Speaker 1: he's a pillar of strength and he epitomizes strength, and
Speaker 1: that was long before the phenomenal strength and poison couraged
Speaker 1: he showed after he got shot on the stage. So
Speaker 1: he is the epitome of strength, and Kamala Harris connotes
Speaker 1: just total weakness weakness through her policies. You know, she's
Speaker 1: so tied to Biden, who is the epitome of weakness.
Speaker 1: So I think that dynamic of strength versus weakness Ryan,
Speaker 1: and I think you know, that will play out across
Speaker 1: a lot of different lines. It's like when people say, hey,
Speaker 1: Trump's making these big gains among blacks, and latinos. I
Speaker 1: think that's part of a bigger trend of making big
Speaker 1: gains among working people because the Democrats have become the
Speaker 1: party of the coastal elites. And who epitomizes that better
Speaker 1: very bad for Democrats than Kamala Harris. You're on the
Speaker 1: Dankpla Show.