Speaker 1: Yesterday when Trump used the swear word and his statement,
Speaker 1: do you think he had to put money in the
Speaker 1: swear jar? What swear jar? And why? You know there's
Speaker 1: there's But when you think about it, there really is
Speaker 1: a history of presidential swearing. It's not quite sure how
Speaker 1: I can do this, But you know that Tuesday Trump
Speaker 1: dropped a bomb. Wasn't a bunker buster bomb, it was
Speaker 1: an F bomb. He was talking to the press about
Speaker 1: Israel and Iron and he said some of the fact
Speaker 1: like we have two countries that have been fighting each
Speaker 1: other for decades or something and they don't know what
Speaker 1: the f they're doing. He was really angry about it.
Speaker 1: You you think about that statement, there's a lot you
Speaker 1: really could say about it, starting with the implied morally
Speaker 1: equivalent between the two countries. There is no moral equivalence
Speaker 1: between the Ranium Mullahs and a democrat state Jewish state
Speaker 1: like Israel. So when he talks about two countries have
Speaker 1: been fighting each other for so long and so hard
Speaker 1: that they don't know what the f they're doing, that's
Speaker 1: kind of a moral equivalence that I have to disagree with.
Speaker 1: But let's forget about that. Since you brought it up.
Speaker 1: Let's focus on the F bomb. Has a president ever
Speaker 1: used that word in public before, used it deliberately in
Speaker 1: a public statement? I don't think so. I think Trump
Speaker 1: may have recorded a first, But just because that might
Speaker 1: be the first F bomb doesn't mean that that's the
Speaker 1: first curse word. Remember harryan bes Truman. It's a quaint story,
Speaker 1: but I gos, I'll never forget this story because something
Speaker 1: like this so Trump with Trump. Truman was giving a
Speaker 1: talk to a lady's luncheon about horticulture. He repeatedly used.
Speaker 2: The word manure.
Speaker 1: A friend of Missus Truman best Truman leaned over to
Speaker 1: her and whispered, couldn't you get him to say fertilizer?
Speaker 1: And Missus Truman is supposed to have answered, you have
Speaker 1: no idea how long it's taken me to get him
Speaker 1: to say manure. Of course, there's a charming story about
Speaker 1: Tom Foley, former Speaker of the House. He was a
Speaker 1: young congressman. He got a call from President Johnson, but
Speaker 1: the president had intended to call somebody else. When he
Speaker 1: realized the mistake, he said the S word, but it
Speaker 1: wasn't a short, sharp word. Johnson and his taxes drawl
Speaker 1: drew it out well, and then Speaker fully would imitate
Speaker 1: Johnson and they joked about it for decades. Johnson is
Speaker 1: probably one of the earliest presidents we ever had, sitting
Speaker 1: on the toilet doing number two with the door open
Speaker 1: and what talking to his staff. Photograph you can go
Speaker 1: google it. You can find photographs of him sitting and
Speaker 1: sitting on the throne talking to his staff. Steven Ambrose,
Speaker 1: the historian, came to talk to some students one time.
Speaker 1: He's working on the biography of Nixon, and he wrote
Speaker 1: about Nixon's profanity. How the Watergate transcripts were dotted with,
Speaker 1: you know, the I think it was probably the I'm
Speaker 1: trying to think probably the first time that I ever
Speaker 1: heard the phrase expte deleted, and that was all throughout
Speaker 1: the transcripts. When you listen to the tapes, you discovered though,
Speaker 1: that actually most of the expative deleted showing how far
Speaker 1: we've changed, were either just Nixon using the word hell
Speaker 1: or dan. So Nixon must have told Rosemary Woods, you know,
Speaker 1: take the rough stuff out, and Rosemary Woods, you know,
Speaker 1: famous for the eighteen minute gap, probably decided that, eh,
Speaker 1: Helen Dan, Yeah, it's not very presidential so I'll take
Speaker 1: those out. I don't think I ever heard Bush say
Speaker 1: much more than damn it. I don't ever recall. I
Speaker 1: just don't recall the S word, certainly never the F bomb.
Speaker 1: May have heard Jeb a few times dropping this S word,
Speaker 1: but I'm just not really sure.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 1: Don't recall any stories about Gerald Ford Carter Carter uh
Speaker 1: talking about Ted Kennedy if he runs, O whip his ass. Yeah. Uh, Reagan.
Speaker 1: I don't think Reagan was necessarily known for vulgarity. Now,
Speaker 1: George H. W. Bush, I think he may have referred
Speaker 1: to what was in in maybe the presidential debates or something.
Speaker 1: But we kicked the ass last night, Uh, and I
Speaker 1: think it was it was a hot mic. Oh, you know,
Speaker 1: I do. I wasn't present, but my old boss referred
Speaker 1: to a reporter I think from the New York Times,
Speaker 1: UH as a major a hole. I'd forgotten about that.
Speaker 1: Obama I don't remember. I wasn't paying much attention, and
Speaker 1: I can't imagine Obama did not swear. But the F bomb.
Speaker 1: I think that was probably the first one that I recall.
Speaker 1: Clarence Thomas has probably done more. Speaking of going back
Speaker 1: to John Lott and going back to the Washington Post
Speaker 1: getting rid of the fatal force database, all of these
Speaker 1: cops for shooting black people all over the country, just
Speaker 1: willy nilly. It reminds me that Clarence Thomas has probably
Speaker 1: done more to free blacks that all the civil rights
Speaker 1: hustlers combined. He really is a staunch believer in equal opportunity,
Speaker 1: that we're all creatures of God, and that we have
Speaker 1: free will to go about and do what we want
Speaker 1: to do. The Braker University recently they've they've got to
Speaker 1: create an equal series out and listen to Justice Thomas.
Speaker 1: Listen to Justice Thomas.
Speaker 2: It seems like the audio double click there for you, Michael.
Speaker 1: No, it's not even double click. It's just the circle
Speaker 1: of hell as it tries to cash the video circle,
Speaker 1: Circle Circle. I know how I can get rid of this.
Speaker 1: We'll do it this way.
Speaker 2: Here.
Speaker 1: We do a lot of things, and we'll do it.
Speaker 3: This really.
Speaker 1: Isn't that fascinating.
Speaker 3: I have to I have to have discussed it because
Speaker 3: they wanted me. Had to have discussed it. It goes
Speaker 3: back to the thing about affirmative action. You have to
Speaker 3: believe in affirmative action because we think you ought to
Speaker 3: believe in affirmative action. Well, how's that different from slavery?
Speaker 2: How's that different from segregation? How's that differently?
Speaker 3: Mean told you can't walk across that park, Oh you
Speaker 3: can't think those thoughts?
Speaker 2: Has it any different?
Speaker 1: You know what?
Speaker 3: I prefer to be excluded from the park because I
Speaker 3: can live my life quite freely without having set foot
Speaker 3: in a party. But you can't live it freely without
Speaker 3: having your own thoughts right yourself, you said. I felt
Speaker 3: as though, really in my life I had been looking
Speaker 3: at the wrong people as the people who would be
Speaker 3: problematic toward me.
Speaker 2: We were told that, Oh, it's.
Speaker 3: Going to be the biggot in the pickup truck, it's
Speaker 3: going to be the clansman, it's going to be the
Speaker 3: royal sheriff. And I'm not saying that there weren't some
Speaker 3: of those who were bad.
Speaker 1: The movie is Created Equal. You can watch it at
Speaker 1: Manifold Productions dot com. Manifold Productions dot com. Justice Thomas,
Speaker 1: the left is the enemy of free thought, and indeed
Speaker 1: they are. They're the ones that are constantly trying to
Speaker 1: tell you what you can think and what you can't think.
Speaker 1: It's really bad that not everyone has the intelligence to
Speaker 1: grasp what Justice Thomas is saying, or the character to
Speaker 1: apply it and live as a free individual, because it's
Speaker 1: far easier for too many people to just luxuriate in
Speaker 1: the victimhood on the Democrat plantation, going back to the
Speaker 1: whole fatal force database, no nuance whatsoever, because they don't
Speaker 1: look at what's causing the crime. If crime rates are
Speaker 1: higher in these minority neighborhoods, does anybody ever stop and
Speaker 1: ask why what's caused it? That's what drives me nuts
Speaker 1: is that they don't. And it's not just the left
Speaker 1: in terms of the politicians that you know. Justice Thomas
Speaker 1: turned to them and told Senator Kennedy, the chair of
Speaker 1: the Judiciary Committee at the time, that this is nothing
Speaker 1: more than a high tech lynching, which is exactly what
Speaker 1: it was. Take for example, the CTU, the Chicago Teachers Union.
Speaker 1: Now it's hard to it's only twelve seconds long, and
Speaker 1: it's a little difficult to understand exactly what she says,
Speaker 1: but I bet you catch it.
Speaker 2: Children are eats children.
Speaker 1: She's mocking someone who said that the CTU, the Chicago
Speaker 1: Teachers Union, thinks that your children are their children.
Speaker 2: Oh, children are eats children. Yes, we do.
Speaker 1: We do, Yes, we do, we do. We think your
Speaker 1: children are indeed our children. You wouldn't know to listen
Speaker 1: to the Democrats, But sedition and treason are they're actually
Speaker 1: against the laws. You know, you know that, right, Yet
Speaker 1: Cynthia Gonzalez is still roaming loose out there on the streets.
Speaker 1: Who's Cynthia Gonzalez? Well, she's currently the Democrat vice mayor
Speaker 1: of kutaheat a ninety seven percent Hispanic city within Los Angeles.
Speaker 1: She reportedly posted a video her self asking gang members
Speaker 1: in LA why they haven't stepped up to defend their
Speaker 1: turf against federal agents as the few between local officials
Speaker 1: and the Trump administration continues. Why haven't you stood up
Speaker 1: to defend your turf against federal agents? She openly encouraged
Speaker 1: criminal gangs to engage in violence against federal officials who
Speaker 1: are attempting to defend the United States from this foreign invasion.
Speaker 1: Now the FBI is reportedly investigating. Well, that shouldn't take
Speaker 1: long because the evidence is reliably available. Of all places,
Speaker 1: Fox News.
Speaker 4: A law enforcement stores telling Fox the Los Angeles County
Speaker 4: official is under investigation after posting the video calling out
Speaker 4: local gang members and telling them to show up to
Speaker 4: defend their turf from ice.
Speaker 2: I've senior national.
Speaker 4: Correspondent William Leijnes live in Los Angeles.
Speaker 1: What do we know about this video? William?
Speaker 2: Oh, we know defens are taking it seriously. John.
Speaker 5: You know California officials here, they've been over backwards, right, Colin,
Speaker 5: You's protests peaceful for here you have an elected official
Speaker 5: appearing to do just the opposite, asking leaders of the stationmanals,
Speaker 5: violent criminal street gangs to confront police and federal agents.
Speaker 2: You guys are all about territory, and this is eight
Speaker 2: Street and this is sor Anthea. They tag everything up
Speaker 2: paming hood and now that you're hoo's been invaded by
Speaker 2: the biggest gang there is, there ain't a value.
Speaker 5: That's Cynthia Gonzalez, vice mayor of Cutahey, it's a small
Speaker 5: city in Los Angeles, on Instagram, saying that the notorious
Speaker 5: Latino gangs Florencia on eighteenth Street should protect their turf.
Speaker 2: Kata is one percent.
Speaker 5: Black, two percent white, ninety seven percent Latino.
Speaker 2: Dude, they're running a muck all up in your on
Speaker 2: your streets, on your streets and in your city and peace.
Speaker 2: When the big gang guns come in nothing but like quiet.
Speaker 5: Protesters confronted Ice last week in an area of.
Speaker 2: Southeast LA near cut Hay.
Speaker 5: Activists said that border patrol vehicles had hit the protesters. Gonzales,
Speaker 5: who halds two master's degrees from UCLA. She's a Democrat,
Speaker 5: calls Ice of the arrest there a war on brown people.
Speaker 5: That's a quote, and she appears to shame the gangs
Speaker 5: for failing to show up.
Speaker 2: So don't be trying to clean no black, no nothing.
Speaker 4: If you're not showing up right now trying to like
Speaker 4: help out and organize, I don't want.
Speaker 2: To hear a peep out of you once they're gone,
Speaker 2: trying to claim that this is my block. This was
Speaker 2: not your block. You were near and here helping out.
Speaker 2: So whoever's the leadership over there, it just.
Speaker 5: Gets members in order, no response John from the city
Speaker 5: or Gonzalez, who says the FBI did pay her a
Speaker 5: visit and.
Speaker 2: Now she wants a lawyer.
Speaker 5: In her other social media posts, they're inflammatory, they're racist,
Speaker 5: and someone say insightful and again the FEDS are taking
Speaker 5: it seriously.
Speaker 2: Back to you, all right, William legend s Force for
Speaker 2: the latest on that.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Sir wow So, Title eighteen, Section twenty three
Speaker 1: eighty four seditious conspiracy If two or more persons in
Speaker 1: any state or territory, or any place subject to the
Speaker 1: jurisdiction in the United States conspire to overthrow, put down,
Speaker 1: or destroy by force the government of the United States,
Speaker 1: or to levy war against them, or to oppose by
Speaker 1: force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder,
Speaker 1: or delay the execution of any law of the United States,
Speaker 1: or by force, disease, take, or possess any property of
Speaker 1: the United States. Contrary to the authority thereof. They shall
Speaker 1: each be fined under this title. We're in prison, not
Speaker 1: more than twenty years or both. Now, others taking part
Speaker 1: in the conspiracy really ought to be easy to find.
Speaker 1: She named the gangs, and if the gangs show up,
Speaker 1: it's pretty clear to draw a correlative line between her
Speaker 1: insight and insightful statements. And okay, well, we were told
Speaker 1: by the Vice mayor we need to show up and
Speaker 1: protect our turf, and so, by golly, here we are.
Speaker 1: So let's have a shootout or let's you know, let's
Speaker 1: barricade the cops, or let's you know, push back and
Speaker 1: fight this shove, do whatever we can. Let's burn the
Speaker 1: cars down. Wow. I don't think she ought to be
Speaker 1: tried for treason. However, whoever owing allegiance to the United States,
Speaker 1: levy's war against them, or adheres to their enemies giving
Speaker 1: them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere,
Speaker 1: is guilty of treason. And I shall suffer death or
Speaker 1: shall it be in prison not less than five years,
Speaker 1: and find under this title but not less than ten
Speaker 1: thousand dollars, then she shall be incapable of holding any
Speaker 1: office under the United States. Now, she's probably not going
Speaker 1: to get that, but certainly when it comes to seditious conspiracy,
Speaker 1: she probably qualifies for that. This is when you think
Speaker 1: about just these past couple of stories. This is the
Speaker 1: radical left that has taken over the country. And the
Speaker 1: final nail in this leftist takeover is probably zarn Mondani
Speaker 1: that we talked about in the first hour. That's the
Speaker 1: new Democrat nominee to be the mayor of New York.
Speaker 1: You know, it's amazing to me. Also on the ballot
Speaker 1: Tuesday was Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. That's soft on
Speaker 1: crime sorels prosecutor, best known for his pursuit of Donald Trump. Well,
Speaker 1: a Marxist wins to run for mayor, Alvin Bragg defeats
Speaker 1: his and wins again. New York is lost.
Speaker 6: What I would like to know is how the Liberals
Speaker 6: that live across the street from me and the ones
Speaker 6: live behind me and nice to me and to the
Speaker 6: other side of me, how do they listen to a
Speaker 6: person that says, why are the gangs not defending the streets?
Speaker 6: And yet they vote for these people. I don't understand it.
Speaker 2: I don't understand it.
Speaker 1: I don't have an answer. They vote for those people
Speaker 1: because one that the the candidates are better organized. Remember,
Speaker 1: we fund much of their campaign indirectly through nngo's that
Speaker 1: then go out and do all of the community organizing.
Speaker 1: This is just a continuation of the Obama original community
Speaker 1: organizing activities that he did in Chicago. And then you
Speaker 1: offer go back, go back to the whole thing about
Speaker 1: the government grocery stores that Mundami is offering to voters
Speaker 1: in New York. I'm thinking unintelligent, publicly educated individuals who
Speaker 1: don't know any better, who have no critical thinking skills.
Speaker 1: Here I can lower the price or groceries because I'm
Speaker 1: going to have the government take it over. And I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna let the big private grocers, you know, price
Speaker 1: gouge you, because I mean, you just use all of
Speaker 1: the language that's all based on emotion, nothing factual, combined
Speaker 1: with a non critical, stupid person who's been indoctrinated by
Speaker 1: public education. And I know, every time I saying it
Speaker 1: about public education, some teachers scream their heads off, and
Speaker 1: I get it, but generally speaking, you're the exception. The
Speaker 1: rule is incompetence or indoctrination, one or the other. And
Speaker 1: so then those people hear about free stuff and they
Speaker 1: latch onto it because you've created a boogeyman. And just
Speaker 1: thinking about the grocery stores, so King Supers and Safeway
Speaker 1: and Publics and you know, Harris Teeters and all the
Speaker 1: other big grocers, Safeway. They're all evil corporations operating on
Speaker 1: very thin margins, but they're evil corporations and delivering you
Speaker 1: food and more choices than you'd have in almost any
Speaker 1: other country in the world. Now I'm not going to
Speaker 1: comment on the quality of the food, but nonetheless they
Speaker 1: deliver you food. And when you go and you find
Speaker 1: out that the price of whatever you're buying has gone up,
Speaker 1: that's price gouging to them, has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: everything in the supply chain that finally got whatever that
Speaker 1: product is onto the grocery store shelf. They don't understand
Speaker 1: that at all. They think they just go in the
Speaker 1: back room in the storeroom and get more and bring
Speaker 1: it out and they just randomly, arbitrarily put a price
Speaker 1: on it. And that's price gouging. And therefore, if the
Speaker 1: government would just step in, because the government solves everything,
Speaker 1: you think about those people who are already dependent upon
Speaker 1: the government, so they don't have to get up every
Speaker 1: morning at four am and go to work. They don't
Speaker 1: have to work until you know, five or six or
Speaker 1: seven o'clock at night. They don't have to worry about
Speaker 1: meeting a payroll, they don't have to worry about, you know,
Speaker 1: keeping people on staff so they can keep selling the
Speaker 1: products or providing the services. They don't worry about any
Speaker 1: of those things. They're economically stupid. They are politically stupid.
Speaker 1: They buy into the emotion. And when they buy into
Speaker 1: the emotion and somebody comes to them and says, I mean,
Speaker 1: whether it's Mondamie in New York offering you know, free housing,
Speaker 1: free transportation, government run grocery stores to bring in cheaper prices.
Speaker 1: That's all they hear, and that's all they want, and
Speaker 1: so they vote for them. When you set up, go
Speaker 1: back to tie. You can tie everything I've talked about
Speaker 1: today to your point. Go back to the fatal force
Speaker 1: database kept by the Washington Post, whose narrative was cops
Speaker 1: disproportionately kill black people more than anybody else. Statistically false.
Speaker 1: But that's the narrative, and it's in the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: So that gets picked up by a DJ just doing
Speaker 1: a small talk show in a small town somewhere, or
Speaker 1: even a music DJ, whatever it might be, and that
Speaker 1: gets spread out, or they read it on TikTok, somebody
Speaker 1: does a TikTok about it, somebody does something on X
Speaker 1: about it, and they read about it, and they see
Speaker 1: it and they just accept it as it is face value,
Speaker 1: without anythinking at all. Do you think they ever read
Speaker 1: the Washington Post.
Speaker 2: No, they don't.
Speaker 1: The Washington Post deliberately knows what they're doing, which is
Speaker 1: creating a narrative that will be picked up by their couriers,
Speaker 1: which will then spread it out over the universe. That's
Speaker 1: the couple at work. They'll spread it out over the
Speaker 1: universe and the useful idiots will pick it up and
Speaker 1: then believe that, oh yeah, all cops are bad because
Speaker 1: they are they're out to kill black people. Then you
Speaker 1: take that vice mayor in that little town in Los
Speaker 1: Angeles and she actually calls on the Hispanic, Latino, Mexican
Speaker 1: whatever it is, cartels gang members to come out and
Speaker 1: fight these people who are just trying to they're just
Speaker 1: trying to separate families. They're just trying to take people
Speaker 1: that what they have a right to be then came
Speaker 1: here illegally, but somehow you've got a right to be here.
Speaker 1: And of course they think they have a right to
Speaker 1: be here. Why because the very thing government that's providing
Speaker 1: them everything, gave them a driver's license, allowed them to vote,
Speaker 1: gave them all the participatory rights that only citizens should have.
Speaker 1: And now they think they're a part of the system,
Speaker 1: may belong to it, and they're getting fed and paid
Speaker 1: and housed by it, so they think it, but they
Speaker 1: belong here, they're a part of it. And now they
Speaker 1: actually get the gangs to come out and defend them
Speaker 1: against those evil ice agents, many of whom happened to
Speaker 1: be Hispanic and Mexican themselves, because they're just the evil
Speaker 1: people out there trying to do what enforced the law
Speaker 1: with that happens we're I when I started using the
Speaker 1: term cabal, I picked it in particular and stuck with
Speaker 1: it because of what it means. A secret political clique
Speaker 1: or a faction. That's the cabal. And while they're not
Speaker 1: secret in the sense that we know who they are,
Speaker 1: they operate in secrecy. They operate as a conspiracy, they
Speaker 1: operate as a reco organization. It's a corrupt organization designed
Speaker 1: to push the left Marxist narrative to the useful idiots
Speaker 1: that will swallow it up. And in exchange for swallowing
Speaker 1: it up and getting all those things I just described,
Speaker 1: a phone, an apartment, or a shelter of some sort,
Speaker 1: whatever it might be, a driver's license, no tech, just
Speaker 1: here here, here's your driver's license. And by the way,
Speaker 1: you're automatically registered to vote as a Democrat. By the way,
Speaker 1: just happens to be year now within that system, And
Speaker 1: you think that's how this country works now, in that
Speaker 1: in that segment of our society, that indeed is how
Speaker 1: it works, all of which gets funded by NGOs, which
Speaker 1: then help them get you know, they get lined up
Speaker 1: for an abortion, or they get lined up for food stamps,
Speaker 1: so they get lined up for legal representation, they get
Speaker 1: lined up for everything. You can possibly imagine that you
Speaker 1: and I work for every single day, and the taxes
Speaker 1: that we pay by working every single day go to
Speaker 1: fund those NGOs until Trump came along, and those NGOs
Speaker 1: in turn used your tax dollars to do two things.
Speaker 1: One pay themselves really hefty, nice salaries, and then go
Speaker 1: out and do the political organizing and campaign that they
Speaker 1: should be prohibited from doing, but which they do every
Speaker 1: single day. And when they come knocking on your door
Speaker 1: or they leave you a flyer, or they you know,
Speaker 1: they go to your church or your community, or your
Speaker 1: food truck or whatever it might be and say, by
Speaker 1: the way, we're having you know, we're having a meeting
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about how to get this
Speaker 1: or how to get that, or or word of mouth
Speaker 1: spreads through these communities. You have a legal problem, Oh,
Speaker 1: I've got an organization for that. Oh I have a
Speaker 1: housing problem. I got an organization for that. Oh I've
Speaker 1: got you know, a medical problem. Oh, we got a
Speaker 1: way to get you medical care. It's the system. And
Speaker 1: so then when it comes voting time and those campaign
Speaker 1: workers come knocking on your door under the guys not
Speaker 1: as not as I'm here for so and so candidate.
Speaker 1: I'm not here for Michael Brown running for mayor. I'm
Speaker 1: here from the whatever whatever whatever coalition or whatever whatever
Speaker 1: legal representation outfit or healthcare outfit. And we're here today
Speaker 1: because we support Michael Brown and we want you to
Speaker 1: vote for Michael Brown. And you know, Michael Brown's done
Speaker 1: all these great things for you and blah blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: and so they just you know, oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: since it's mail back, have you got your ballot, we'll
Speaker 1: go ahead and fill it out right now for Michael
Speaker 1: Brown and we'll take it to the poll for you.
Speaker 1: We'll drop it off for you. Yeah. Corrupt our systems
Speaker 1: how it happens, and that's how it will continue to happen.
Speaker 1: Why do you think the reaction to DOGE, to cutting
Speaker 1: out Usaid, to trying to straighten out medicare, medicaid, social security, Medicare, medicaid,
Speaker 1: social security. Why do you think that anything that they
Speaker 1: do to try to reduce the expense and costs of
Speaker 1: the federal government or to downsize or whatever meets with
Speaker 1: such resistance because the special vested interests live off of it.
Speaker 1: They literally live off of it. And then they keep
Speaker 1: themselves in power because they pay themselves so much money
Speaker 1: that and they get so much money from the government
Speaker 1: that they create a huge organization that then goes out
Speaker 1: and does everything that I just talked about, and it
Speaker 1: gets fed by MSNBC, CNN, AB's, all the all the
Speaker 1: networks they feed into it, all the little local, you know,
Speaker 1: community newspapers that feed into it. All of that just
Speaker 1: becomes a living organism. And the one thing that the
Speaker 1: only thing that they those recipients have to do is
Speaker 1: just vote the right way. And of course you'll vote
Speaker 1: the right way because we're the ones that gave you
Speaker 1: everything that you have and that protect you and that
Speaker 1: you know, call in the gangs when you need protection,
Speaker 1: and so when we ask you to vote for so
Speaker 1: and so, you'll vote for so and so, and the
Speaker 1: cycle discontinues. It's really vicious, it's really ugly. And I
Speaker 1: think that's why Trump, and particularly in Trump two point zero,
Speaker 1: is such a threat because right now he has no guardrails.
Speaker 1: The only guardrail he has is January one, four years
Speaker 1: from now when he leaves office. So he's going to
Speaker 1: do everything he can, and they're going to fight him
Speaker 1: every step of the way.
Speaker 4: Mike, I'd like to see what those nuclear sites looked
Speaker 4: like right before and after.
Speaker 2: Obama gave them the palettes of Euros.
Speaker 1: Oh, they were outfitted very nicely. New carpet, new tile,
Speaker 1: new steel, new conveyor belts, knew everything, new elevators. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they were grand, grand places. We were told that these
Speaker 1: pricey and unreliable electric vehicles, that that's the future of
Speaker 1: automobile travel and that we must get on board to
Speaker 1: save the planet. And the future is no longer mandatory
Speaker 1: because once again Trump, causing problems for the radical left,
Speaker 1: canceled the California mandate that Democrats had begun to extend nationwide.
Speaker 1: In fact, in Colorado, our own Attorney General Phil Wiser,
Speaker 1: who desperately wants to be governor, has joined the lawsuit
Speaker 1: with California. I think maybe eighteen other states trying to
Speaker 1: fight Trump on eliminating that mandate. Well it's not just that,
Speaker 1: by the way, Just keep that in mind when you
Speaker 1: think about the Democrat primary for governor in Colorado. I mean,
Speaker 1: I see Phil Wiser on the television just about every
Speaker 1: single day now with some new you know, some new
Speaker 1: lawsuits files somewhere against Trump. I guess it's only that's
Speaker 1: the only way for Democrats to win elections, to oppose Trump.
Speaker 2: But the eluxury.
Speaker 1: Vehicle future is going down, kind of like the Titanic.
Speaker 1: A ship holding thousands of cars sank in the Pacific
Speaker 1: Ocean on Monday, weeks after a fire broke out on
Speaker 1: a deck that was holding evs, stoking industry concerns about
Speaker 1: transporting highly flammable batteries. The six hundred foot long Morning
Speaker 1: Minus had been adrift at sea since June third, when
Speaker 1: the flames broke out and the crew was to abandon ship.
Speaker 1: I thought you, I thought the captain stayed with the ship,
Speaker 1: you know, I thought you went down with the ship.
Speaker 1: But the crew of the Morning Midas they're not the
Speaker 1: only ones abandoning ship because Elon Musk, remember him, Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: he's too smart to go down with electric vehicles. So
Speaker 1: Tesla is shifting gears and going into robots. This is
Speaker 1: from ink dot Com. Elon must say that Tesla will
Speaker 1: build at least five thousand Optimus robots this year and
Speaker 1: maybe as many as ten thousand. The company will build
Speaker 1: another fifty thousand Optimus robots next year and will work
Speaker 1: its way up from there. It may eventually be built
Speaker 1: ten million robots a year or more, and he believes
Speaker 1: there will be enough demand to sell every one of them.
Speaker 1: Musk is saying the future of Tesla isn't cars, it's
Speaker 1: really robots, and that's what he's aiming for now. One
Speaker 1: advantage is is that when the nutjobs on the left
Speaker 1: tried to set the robots on fire, maybe those robots
Speaker 1: you've seen the robots boxing, maybe they can fight back.
Speaker 1: I think we're beginning to see the demise of the
Speaker 1: EV industry, and I don't know whether it's five years
Speaker 1: or ten years from now. They'll go back to where
Speaker 1: they were just a niche little market that just some
Speaker 1: company might just offer a few of them, and those
Speaker 1: who want to save the planet will go buy those
Speaker 1: and the rest will be history.