Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. So yesterday Pam Bondy sat before the Senate
and she talked about a whole host of things, and
of course the topic of Jeffrey Epstein was front and center,
and there was a lot of back and forth between
Pam Bondy and the senators, and frankly, I found it
all disgusting. It's all performative, all of it. It's not
really trying to drill down to figure out what happened.
It's not trying to get to the bottom of, you know,
what Epstein was up to. Instead, these senators are all
looking for a gotcha moment, and they hope that they
can utilize that gotcha moment as a political cudgel to
use against their political enemies. And that's exactly why they're
interested all of a sudden, because they feel like they
have some ground they can make up. But they'll get
up here and they'll tell you that it's something completely different, right,
that they care all of a sudden that they want
to bring justice to Jeffrey Epstein victims. Well, you had
your chance to do that for years, and all you
did was ignore the topic and call people who were
interested in the topic and who were actually doing the
work crazy. But now you're gonna get up there and
act self righteous and hurl all these accusations at everybody else.
And that might play with your base, but for the
rest of us, it looks disgusting and it looks like
it's very self serving. We've had all these hearings now
since what July, Committees, this, that, the other thing, and
what's come of it not a damn thing. We don't
even have the alex Acosta transcripts yet. Well, you have
to go through that with a fine tooth comb and
make sure that we don't have the information that's needed.
It's all just a gigantic joke to these people, and
it's all about scoring political points, and that goes for
both sides. And like I always say, that's how they
weaponize the confusion. They want everybody to be confused about
everything that went on, everything that's still going on. That way,
it's almost in possible to cut through what's real and
what's fake. And that's how they thrive. And then you
have these senators that get up there and pound Bondy,
that get up there and instead of doing anything productive.
It's just a shit show, an absolute circus of allegations
being flung around, and the whole hell of a lot
of what about ism on top of it. So today
we're going to dive into an article from The New
York Post talking about Pound Bondy and her hearing in
front of the Senate that was yesterday headline, pound Bondy
lashes out at Dems in rowdy hearing over the Epstein
case salacious remarks. This article was authored by Stephen Nelson,
Attorney General. Pound Bondi went on offense Tuesday as Senate
Democrats Grilleder about the Jeffrey Epstein case and other matters,
with Bondy at one point suggesting Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of
Rhode Island might be concerned about embarrassing links to the
late pedophile. Bondi sought to turn the tables on white
House and Senator Dick Durbin during a Senate Judiciary Committee
hearing after facing months of criticism over her July sixth
memo recommending against further public disclosures in the notorious sex
traffickers case. How many of those Treasury suspicious activity reports
did you, or FBI Director Cash battel investigate. White House
asked Bondie about transactions made by Epstein that had been
flagged by the banks. The attorney general snapback, Senator, I'm
not sure if you're concerned because you took money, I
believe did you from Reed Hoffman, one of Epstein's closest confidants,
not only once but twice in twenty eighteen and twenty
twenty four. Well that's true, but you realize, miss Bondie,
that Leon Black's son, one of Jeffrey Epstein's bigger confidants,
is part of the Trump administration. So how about we
just save the what about ism because it's obvious that
both sides were eating out of Jeffrey Epstein's trough. She added,
did you ask former Attorney General Merrick Garland any of
this over the last four years when he sat before you?
And that's a legitimate point. That is certainly a legitimate point.
The Biden administration didn't give one single damn about what
was going on with Epstein. And we all know that
as CIA director Bill Burns was friendly with Epstein and
even went to his house several times and was talking
about how Epstein some kind of lifestyle coach that's Biden's
head of the CIA, or how about Bill Richardson? Should
we talk about him? So there's certainly a legitimate point
to be made about the previous administrations not giving one
single damn about what went on, But save the what
about ism. You're in control now, you're in power now,
I don't care what the previous administrations did. Either you're
gonna step up and do the right thing or you're not.
And you can try and put the blame wherever you
want to put it, but it's not going to work.
I mean, maybe for your base or whatever, but the
vast maj already of people see this bullshit for what
it is. White House plowed on. There's been public reporting
that Jeffrey Epstein showed people photos of President Trump with
half naked young women. Do you know if the FBI
found those photos in their search of Jeffrey Epstein's safe
or a premises or otherwise. Now, look, I've never seen
those pictures, But would I be shocked if they existed? Hell? No,
I wouldn't be. And why not? Well? Trump was involved
in that world, right, the modeling world was involved in
the beauty pageants, So would it be that shocking? If
these two dudes were together when they were friendly and
there was a girl that was half naked, so we
need some contact with that kind of comment. You can't
just fire off that comment and be like, well was
he with a half naked girl? Okay, where were they at?
What was the situation? Right? And all of that matters
because if you don't do that, and you don't be
fully transparent about what you're talking about, you're gonna give
the quote unquote other side the ammunition they need to say, Look,
this is all just a political hit job. Bondi blasted
him again. You know, Senator white House, you sit here
and make salacious remarks once again, trying to slander President
Trump left and right, and you're the one who was
taking money from one of Epstein's closest confidants, and the
Senator sitting right next to you, Durban, tried to block
the flight logs from being released. I don't know about you, folks,
but I'm really tired of all this blame being thrown
everywhere but where it belongs, and that's what the people
who are in charge. Enough is enough. You have the
power right now, pound BONDI, to change things. You have
the power to walk directly into the DOJ and tell
them you want to get rid of the NPA. You
have that power nobody else. Now, look, I'm not going
to sit here and tell you that these senators are
good people. I don't think they are. And the vast
majority of them took Jeffrey Epstein's money and didn't give
one single damn about the survivors while they were doing it,
and then even afterwards they acted like it wasn't a
big deal. Some of them talked about how I'm not
going to give the money back. Stacy Plaskett, I'm looking
at you. Then you have other people who took money previously,
and they're like, well, that's a defunct campaign. What do
you want us to do now, Well, how about doing
the right thing and giving the money back? Don adding
it something? But no, it's all performative. It's all this
is what you should be doing. Meanwhile, the people that
are saying that are the ones that are over at
Epstein's house breaking bread with them. When Durbin spoke, Bondie
pointed out that in twenty twenty three, the committee's top
democrat blocked an attempt by Senator Marshall Blackburn to force
the disclosure of Epstein's flight logs. Why was the July
seventh memo un signed? Durban asked. Bondi retorted, why did
you fight to not disclose the flight logs? Senator Durbin?
I did not refuse, he claimed, one of the senators
here wished to produce those logs. I asked her to
put it in writing, and she never did so. Why
didn't you if it was that big of a deal,
Senator Durbin, and somebody brought it up. Why you waiting
for somebody else to kick things into gear? Why don't
you be the hero? Why don't you step up and say, hey,
I'm gonna be the guy that breaks this wide open.
I'll tell you why, because you never cared. And the
only reason you care now is because you think you're
gonna win some political points by doing so. So you
can miss me with all that self righteous bullshit. You
know that I submitted that in writing Blackburn cut in
to skuld Durban, and you continue to misrepresent that, and
I'm not going to let that record stand. Trump has
tried to move on from the Epstein controversy, calling it
a democratic hoax designed to smear him for his socializing
with the disgraced financier in the nineteen nineties and early
two thousands. I mean, imagine having the audacity in the
stones to call this shit a hoax, like for real,
talk about a self inflicted wound politically speaking. And of
course that rift is just widening. Look at what's going
on with Marjorie Taylor Green talking about how she's being pressured,
how the part he's going after, the whole thing. God
forbids somebody has their own mind, right, God forbid somebody
leaves the echo chamber. Now you're the enemy. Now you're
a hostile force because you want the truth and you're
demanding transparency from the government. And somehow that makes you
the bad guy. I mean, God forbid, you go against
the party. Right. Bipartisan cohort in Congress has continued to
seek more information about Epstein's links to powerful men such
as former President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, former Harvard president
Larry Summers, and Microsoft chief Bill Gates with subpoenas and
in sharing public disclosures by the Republican Ledhouse Oversight Committee,
and all of those dudes plus more should be brought
up and spoken to. And I think that Senator Kennedy
was on the right path talking about bringing up Howard
Lutnik and having him talk about what he knows, because
obviously he knows a lot more than he let on.
We all heard what he had to say recently, So yeah,
Howard Lutnick should definitely be brought up, along with all
those other people that were just mentioned, Prince Andrew, Larry Summers,
Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, everybody. And of course some of
them are being brought in, but it only scratches the surface.
They're not going deep enough because obviously there's a lot
more here if you go a little bit deeper below
the surface. A lot of other people that could be
brought in. What about the guards Tavin Noel and Michael Thomas.
What about the person who was the lieutenant on shift
that night? What about the EMS workers? What about See
where I'm going with this. There's a lot of people
that haven't even been thought about that should be brought
up in front of Congress or the Senate, put under
oath and ask questions. And it's not because I think
that were involved, but they might remember something or know
something that advances the investigation overall. But instead these people
haven't even been spoken to, certainly not on the record.
Bondi and Durbin also tangled over the legal justification of
Trump's decision to dispatch the National Guard to Chicago. Bondi
highlighted the hundreds of homicides that have taken place in
the Windy City in recent years, and noted that Bettel
and Deputy Attorney General Todd Baby Billy Blanche were en
route to the city on Tuesday. Well, that's cool, Todd
Blanche can show up down in Chicago. He's not busy
waiting hand and foot on Glenn Maxwell anymore. No more
Chick fil a sandwiches for his buddy Glaan huh, Well
that's nice. I wish you love Chicago as much as
you hate President Trump, Bondi swiped at the ranking member,
If you're not going to protect your citizens, President Trump,
Will Bondi deployed a similar line of attack against Senator
Alex Padia in response to a question about whether the
administration is required to follow court orders temporarily blocking the
deployment of troops to American cities. And the rest of
the article just talks about the other things that were
going on during the hearing, and they're not really relevant
to the topic at hand. So we're just gonna end
this article right here because it gives you everything you
need to know about that hearing when it comes to
Epstein anyway, and it was just a gigantic circus once again,
nothing ever gets accomplished, just allegations thrown around, a whole
bunch of what about ism, a bunch of finger pointing,
but never any results. And that's exactly what we had
yesterday with Pam Bondi in front of the Senate, and unfortunately,
my guess is that's what we can expect moving forward.
All of the information that goes with this episode can
be found in the description box.