Speaker 1: Get ready.
Speaker 2: November eight, twenty twenty four, allegedly, according to that thing
Speaker 2: we call a calendar, this the O'Kelly effect, you listening
Speaker 2: to us live, If indeed it's Friarsday night, Friday night,
Speaker 2: right the eighth day of November, just a little bit
Speaker 2: after eight pm Eastern here and what we used to
Speaker 2: call America. If that's when it is, you might be
Speaker 2: hearing us live, and that means you could join us,
Speaker 2: because it's the open Mic night on the Ocelli effect.
Speaker 2: And you can do that by calling in three one nine,
Speaker 2: five two seven, five zero one six three one nine
Speaker 2: five two seven five zero one six. That's the number
Speaker 2: to call and bring up whatever's on your mind. Not
Speaker 2: much happened this week, so you know, not much to
Speaker 2: carry in the news. The selection occurred. Did it happen
Speaker 2: exactly as I predicted? Pretty much? But hey, who's saying
Speaker 2: I told you so? Oh me? But all right, anyway,
Speaker 2: it is what it is. It was what it was,
Speaker 2: and look, nobody's crying foul. People are crying they screwed
Speaker 2: up and why and of course they've got everything wrong.
Speaker 2: It is what it is. This is exactly what was
Speaker 2: going to be and I'll tell you when I take
Speaker 2: a look at the stories being floated about Iran Okay,
Speaker 2: before the selection, after the selection, and what you're going
Speaker 2: to see in the very near future. I got a
Speaker 2: feeling I know where all that's going, but I need
Speaker 2: a few more days for analysis before I make that announcement. Anyway,
Speaker 2: it is what it is. It was what it was,
Speaker 2: And oh geez, it's the eighth day of November, so
Speaker 2: let's see twenty second. Let's do some math here. What
Speaker 2: would that be? Fourteen days exactly? Yeah, two weeks exactly.
Speaker 2: I'll be in Dallas, Texas at the Lancer conference. You know.
Speaker 2: The hotel is the Mariette downtown, Okay, And I'll be
Speaker 2: there on the twenty second through the twenty fourth of
Speaker 2: this month, Like I said, two weeks from now in Dallas,
Speaker 2: Texas at the downtown Marriott. So there you go, and
Speaker 2: you can go to Assassination Conference dot com and sign
Speaker 2: up to either go see it virtually or go in
Speaker 2: person and use the discount code o'helley ten to get
Speaker 2: ten percent off. Oh, by the way, the KAPA Conference,
Speaker 2: what I'm being told right now, the KAPA Conference has
Speaker 2: decided to only be virtual this year canceling. It's in
Speaker 2: person stuff, so we might be well, I'm sure Judy's
Speaker 2: still gotten in person something going on down there, but
Speaker 2: slowly but surely, maybe we'll eliminate competition here as we go.
Speaker 2: Maybe we'll be the only person game in town and
Speaker 2: the virtual conferences will be what they are, and hell,
Speaker 2: anybody could organize one of those. But anyway, Lancer definitely
Speaker 2: in person this year and virtually so you got a choice.
Speaker 2: So that's that. But uh, yeah, nothing else has really happened.
Speaker 2: Oh wait a minute, we did have something else happened
Speaker 2: this week. The uh, the Trumpster is coming back for
Speaker 2: another four year stint. Ready for that one, are you?
Speaker 2: I'm sure I'm gonna hear from a couple of you
Speaker 2: at three one nine five two seven five zero one six,
Speaker 2: And I'm surprised we can get more calls during the
Speaker 2: special election coverage on Tuesday night where I called it
Speaker 2: early and uh, it was easy to do based on
Speaker 2: what we saw coming out, and b Pete joined me
Speaker 2: for that one, so oh he's with me tonight also,
Speaker 2: So anyway, now I'm not flying alone. Although I did
Speaker 2: the call in show by myself last night, nobody called
Speaker 2: in and we did that show on Tuesday, running through
Speaker 2: the selection for about I don't know it was near
Speaker 2: four hours. I think three and a half something like that.
Speaker 2: I'd have to check the time. But those podcasts are out.
Speaker 2: Everything is out, so hopefully you're enjoying that and you're
Speaker 2: gonna enjoy what comes up until I take the break
Speaker 2: to go to Texas. So enough out of me, be Pete.
Speaker 2: Although I'm going to give the number one more time
Speaker 2: three one nine five two seven five zero one six
Speaker 2: call in and join us and be heard on this
Speaker 2: or any other topic on the Friday night open mic,
Speaker 2: bet Pete, how was your week outside of us making
Speaker 2: you do Tuesday for three and a half hours and uh,
Speaker 2: and now you're back for Friday for almost another two
Speaker 2: So you're you're putting in five hours with the network
Speaker 2: this week? How you doing?
Speaker 3: Oh, it was actually more than five hours because you
Speaker 3: crashed out early.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: Once you whipped out, I sat up. I wanted to
Speaker 3: watch Rachel Meadow five, so I switched over to MSNBC
Speaker 3: and it was all she could do to keep from
Speaker 3: her voice breaking. I mean, she was talking in a
Speaker 3: weird way and making weird gestures. Wear her head so
Speaker 3: she wouldn't look at the camera, and she's about to
Speaker 3: lose it, and then she sagged out about two once
Speaker 3: once Kamala wasn't going to speak, and Trump decided, hey,
Speaker 3: I got enough there and enough in the book. I'm
Speaker 3: having my speech. She kind of left. So there we
Speaker 3: were left with Jim Kasaki for the rest of the
Speaker 3: evening and the brules shit coming out of her mouth
Speaker 3: over this election is it's been fun to watch. It's
Speaker 3: been fun to watch the other side come up with
Speaker 3: a thousand reasons as to why they lost, except for
Speaker 3: the obvious one. They sucked. I mean they you know,
Speaker 3: they basically rigged their side of the election, put who
Speaker 3: they wanted up there just so she come And I
Speaker 3: didn't know this. Kamala raised a billion dollars on her
Speaker 3: own in one hundred and seven days, less than one
Speaker 3: hundred and seven days.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's how much.
Speaker 3: Wasted billion dollars. And that was the biggest waste of
Speaker 3: a billion dollars I have ever seen in my life.
Speaker 3: Because we watched every ad that she put out on
Speaker 3: solid rotation for two months.
Speaker 2: Well, it's a bigger waste, amazing, It's an even bigger
Speaker 2: waste than that if you think about it, because remember
Speaker 2: I was pointing out before Joe dropped out, right, the
Speaker 2: first quarter of twenty twenty four, there was half a billion,
Speaker 2: more than half a billion between Trump and guess what
Speaker 2: Biden in the first quarter then the second quarter.
Speaker 3: No, I know, and see I mean by And that's
Speaker 3: why they went the way that they did during the
Speaker 3: convention and not have a vote and go ahead and
Speaker 3: move her in because it was the only way that
Speaker 3: they could keep the money.
Speaker 2: Well, but it wasn't.
Speaker 3: Tied to the ticket, and the only person the DNC decided, Look,
Speaker 3: we got all this money we've already raised, and some
Speaker 3: donors piped in and said, hey, if you guys don't
Speaker 3: figure this out, I'm not giving you any more. Right,
Speaker 3: So they had to go with Kamalas because she's tied
Speaker 3: to the money. They couldn't give it to somebody unless
Speaker 3: they were listed on a ticket. He was the only one, right.
Speaker 2: But FEC filings tell us that if she raised and
Speaker 2: they made a big deal about how she raised a
Speaker 2: huge amount of money, like in the first twenty four hours.
Speaker 2: But the thing is, the way I'm counting it, it's
Speaker 2: minimally there was two billion dollars there, Okay, minimum, that's
Speaker 2: how much they had to work with for this year.
Speaker 2: That's how I counted Biden.
Speaker 3: But part of that, part of that money was money
Speaker 3: that Biden brought over from the last election.
Speaker 2: Yes, more then they.
Speaker 3: Had a bunch of donors go in, and yes, they
Speaker 3: had a good first quarter, and they were pouring it in.
Speaker 3: I'd say, all told, you're probably looking at closer to
Speaker 3: four billion dollars. Well, see, I haven't even gotten all
Speaker 3: this money out there on the periphery that was to it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well I'm not even getting that.
Speaker 3: I just can't imagine that that much waste. Of course,
Speaker 3: I didn't realize she raised that much on our own.
Speaker 2: Well, but be beat hold up, I didn't even go
Speaker 2: to that calculation. I'm just talking about what was raised
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty four. I'm not talking about what else
Speaker 2: was raised and what wasn't filed with the FBC. I'm saying,
Speaker 2: just the Federal Elections Commission what we know was filed
Speaker 2: for for twenty twenty four. The amount of money that
Speaker 2: was spent altogether is yet another animal. And I'm not
Speaker 2: even talking about Trump's money, by the way, forget it.
Speaker 2: I mean with Trump's money as a whole other thing,
Speaker 2: with his products and everything else. I'm not even counting
Speaker 2: that if you take a look at it. I mean,
Speaker 2: four billion might be an underestimate as well, with the
Speaker 2: amount of money that was spent between twenty twenty three
Speaker 2: and twenty twenty four. I was just telling you the
Speaker 2: two billion dollars at a bare minimum is what came
Speaker 2: in and was being used for just this year. So
Speaker 2: from January to November, at least two billion dollars is
Speaker 2: what came in and what was in the campaign's war chest.
Speaker 2: I don't know what remains now, by the way, and
Speaker 2: what they're going to do with it. Well, you see
Speaker 2: how much the.
Speaker 3: Headline right here she ended twenty million in debt despite
Speaker 3: raising over a billion dollars in one and seven days.
Speaker 2: Okay, see, now here's another one of those circumstances where
Speaker 2: I know the government can run at a massive debt.
Speaker 2: How does a business that comes into existence like a campaign,
Speaker 2: how does it run twenty million in debt? I mean, seriously,
Speaker 2: how do you end up that way? Are we talking
Speaker 2: about unpaid bills or you know, or do they have
Speaker 2: a bunch of rubber checks out.
Speaker 3: There on what they've got on the books, what they
Speaker 3: had in the bank, and what they the receipts that
Speaker 3: they've got to pay. They're looking twenty million in debt.
Speaker 3: I'm sure a lot of that was traveled the way
Speaker 3: they started trying to keep up with the Trump and
Speaker 3: Trump is workaholic. Anybody that's ever worked with him, been
Speaker 3: around him, says, the guy never sleeps. He works constantly.
Speaker 3: So he was up for this, wasn't And a lot
Speaker 3: of the traveling involved was in response to certain things.
Speaker 3: You know, she didn't pay a lot of attention to
Speaker 3: Pennsylvania until suddenly it became a swing state, and she
Speaker 3: didn't pay any attention to the Blue Wall. You know,
Speaker 3: people were saying, why aren't you going to Michigan. She
Speaker 3: was on her way to something, was it outside of Detroit,
Speaker 3: and the opportunity came for her to go on Saturday
Speaker 3: Night Live, So she blew off whatever event they had planned.
Speaker 3: She flew to New York, did that, cameo, and then
Speaker 3: the next day went back out on the trail. It's
Speaker 3: like Hillary, she didn't visit a lot of states. She lost, right,
Speaker 3: and she wondered, you know, why do I lose them? Well,
Speaker 3: Kamala was the same thing. So I'm sure a lot
Speaker 3: of their expense there towards the end was this frantic
Speaker 3: travel that they were trying to get in because they
Speaker 3: pumped in a lot of Now, she didn't pump in
Speaker 3: near as many as Trump. He was doing three to
Speaker 3: day to three a data her two when it came
Speaker 3: to all and that, so I'm sure that's where a
Speaker 3: lot of it went. Well. And TV, I mean, they
Speaker 3: decided to start running ads. They pulled money from North
Speaker 3: Carolina and the DNC pumped in some money to make
Speaker 3: up for it, and they moved that money to Pennsylvania
Speaker 3: so they could buy ants up there because they figured
Speaker 3: North Carolina was.
Speaker 2: Well. And they definitely paid for Georgia because I saw
Speaker 2: this stuff constantly, you know, and it was advertised across
Speaker 2: the board. It's funny because little kids watching, you know,
Speaker 2: children's videos on YouTube were getting Kamala commercials. I'm just
Speaker 2: telling you that right now, and Trump commercials. They were
Speaker 2: getting campaign commercials everywhere. Now, I know you paid for
Speaker 2: the YouTube premium or whatever, but if you were getting
Speaker 2: commercials on YouTube, it didn't matter what algo, what you
Speaker 2: were following, or what you were actually being fed on
Speaker 2: your videos. You were getting this stuff whether you were
Speaker 2: watching a how to video for crafts, or you were
Speaker 2: watching children's videos, or you were watching documentaries or trying
Speaker 2: to listen to music. You were getting these ads no
Speaker 2: matter what on YouTube. And they did them regionally because
Speaker 2: we saw ads that were specifically made for Georgia. You know,
Speaker 2: like there was the girl that allegedly died, you know,
Speaker 2: because she couldn't get an abortion, that girl that commercial
Speaker 2: for Kamala was here. Trump's whole thing about how you know,
Speaker 2: basically the the the criminal action on the border and
Speaker 2: all that kind of stuff, and who let it happen?
Speaker 2: Kamala did, and you know, if she does that to
Speaker 2: this state, then how's you know, what do you think
Speaker 2: she's gonna do to Georgia. They were very specific, so
Speaker 2: I'm imagining that in North Carolina you had something similar
Speaker 2: for a while and then what did they do? They
Speaker 2: pulled out because they gave up on North Carolina. I mean,
Speaker 2: is that what happened there? Or what?
Speaker 3: I'm sorry, what was that last bit you broke up?
Speaker 2: So I was asking if they like gave up on
Speaker 2: North Carolina toward the end, is that possible?
Speaker 3: Yeah, they did. Yeah, because they ran well, they knew that.
Speaker 3: They looked at the numbers and figured Trump had it.
Speaker 3: So that's why they pulled their money out and put
Speaker 3: Kamala's specific stuff in Pennsylvania and other places. And then
Speaker 3: the DNC bumped up their advertising a little, okay, so
Speaker 3: you know, but it wasn't enough to compensate for what
Speaker 3: they pulled out. Yeah, that was the headline here once
Speaker 3: they announced. You know, these stations all announced, hey, Molly
Speaker 3: and Vinus many ads, they're pulling what they've got left
Speaker 3: in reserved, taking their money elsewhere.
Speaker 2: And the support passage, I mean that it.
Speaker 3: Is you react. Yeah, you have to react to the
Speaker 3: to what's going on. I mean, why dump a lot
Speaker 3: of money into a state you know you're gonna leave?
Speaker 3: Pennsylvania was I think her key. She expected to take
Speaker 3: Pennsylvania because she thought she was protected to the north
Speaker 3: with Michigan and in Wisconsin and of course Minnesota, that's
Speaker 3: you know, that's a given. But she needed Pennsylvania and
Speaker 3: they really pumped it. I think the last what they said,
Speaker 3: the last twelve rallies or something of hers was uh
Speaker 3: in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 2: Mm. Yeah, I know. She was making trips there. It
Speaker 2: was interesting though, because the packs were clearly disconnected from
Speaker 2: the campaigns, because even when she bailed out of a place,
Speaker 2: her campaign stopped advertising, or Trump's campaign stopped advertising, the
Speaker 2: packs that you know, are not part of the campaign
Speaker 2: technically kept going. Like that that transgender thing that had
Speaker 2: the clips with Charlemagne the god in it, and you
Speaker 2: know common believes.
Speaker 4: Pay for sex changes for yep, that one got play.
Speaker 2: Well, same thing in Georgia that came in, but that
Speaker 2: was by a pack that wasn't Trump's campaign. That was
Speaker 2: a pack yeah, right, And there was that, and you know,
Speaker 2: the I forget what it was, but it was something
Speaker 2: similar to make America great, uh, you know, like make
Speaker 2: the US a good place again or something pack you know, similar,
Speaker 2: but water down version of the of the of the slogan.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 2: Pack was running stuff too, and uh it was either
Speaker 2: the border or the transgender issue or you know, and
Speaker 2: and that was it. It seemed like those were the
Speaker 2: two main issues. And on the Harris side, it was
Speaker 2: well what about abortion? And then you know, when Trump
Speaker 2: would run it was look at what Biden and Harrison
Speaker 2: already screwed up, and they'll continue to screw it up
Speaker 2: and that's what you got, wall to wall constant. Anyways,
Speaker 2: that's what was and this is what is.
Speaker 3: And again I said election though, you know, we got
Speaker 3: to see we saw a lot of changes in the
Speaker 3: shift of the populace and what was important to them.
Speaker 3: I noticed that, you know, the New York Times stage
Speaker 3: we were using on went down to look at the
Speaker 3: shift from last election, and it was amazing how much
Speaker 3: of Wright's shift two thirds of this country took just
Speaker 3: I don't know over what time, but I mean that
Speaker 3: was the end result. A little bit of blue on
Speaker 3: the map, but most of it was red air shifting
Speaker 3: to the right.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, the age thing was interesting to my mind
Speaker 2: because you know a lot of younger people, which everybody
Speaker 2: was like, oh, the younger people are going to vote
Speaker 2: for Harris, and they did not. That is not what
Speaker 2: they did.
Speaker 3: Tum did very well in every demographic. He did well
Speaker 3: in well, he won. He's the first president since what
Speaker 3: Reagan had won in Miami Gate area. M that's going
Speaker 3: back to the eighties.
Speaker 2: Well, first president since Grover Cleveland to win two non
Speaker 2: consecutive presidential terms. Okay, rather interesting there, and this time
Speaker 2: looks like he actually takes the popular vote, which he
Speaker 2: did not do the first time he won. Mmm. Uh
Speaker 2: so you know, where where is your argument? And again,
Speaker 2: as I said, there was legitimate support for him, not
Speaker 2: for her. There was no enthusiasm being built. And the
Speaker 2: funny thing that I see them wringing their hands about
Speaker 2: is is this Joe Biden's fault because he stayed in
Speaker 2: too long as a deadweight candidate? Is that is that
Speaker 2: the problem is? You know? What is it?
Speaker 3: This?
Speaker 2: Is it? That? Is it? The third thing, how about
Speaker 2: the fact that Kamala is just not a good candidate.
Speaker 2: She wasn't to begin with, and you had the perfect los.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's not only her. It's not only her, it's
Speaker 3: some of the policies that have been put in place.
Speaker 3: You know, people are having a hard time feeding the
Speaker 3: family and that is the number one issue that people
Speaker 3: were dealing with, and they felt that Trump was better
Speaker 3: prepared to handle that than Kamala. I mean that if
Speaker 3: you look at it from the issues, then you can
Speaker 3: understand why people shifted. When Latinos are worried about the
Speaker 3: border crisis and Trump takes forty five percent of them,
Speaker 3: you know, it's this. This whole thing was missed, well,
Speaker 3: I won't say misread. There were people out there that
Speaker 3: call this and called it on policy, and they called
Speaker 3: it on numbers. But the majority of the media that
Speaker 3: we had to listen to was all about Kamala. Every
Speaker 3: person that I listened to took every opportunity to include
Speaker 3: every possible slight against Trump in a simple two sentence
Speaker 3: description of whatever was going on. You know, it's just
Speaker 3: amazing how vile these people were. I mean, they could
Speaker 3: not let an opportunity go by that, you know, and Kamala.
Speaker 3: This is taking on convicted felon Donald Trump, who still
Speaker 3: has several court cases against him. And you know, the
Speaker 3: lie about calling soldiers suckers and losers is still being
Speaker 3: heard this morning on these programs and it has been
Speaker 3: debunked six ways from Sundays see again.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but again, all that did is build up more
Speaker 2: the grievance issue, right, which is this is the outsider
Speaker 2: that the whole establishment is still against. And got to
Speaker 2: tell you, if the establishment is failing everybody because it
Speaker 2: is difficult to eat, it is difficult to pay your bills,
Speaker 2: you're getting choked to death. And guess what, you look
Speaker 2: at the people that are supposedly in charge, and you
Speaker 2: go must be their fault. Whether it is or isn't.
Speaker 2: That that's it. That's all there is to it. And
Speaker 2: then perfectly set up is this is the guy the
Speaker 2: establishment is going after. Well, gee, you know, maybe we
Speaker 2: need that guy. It was so perfectly done. I gotta
Speaker 2: say it was perfectly positioned. There was no way that
Speaker 2: she was gonna be able to win this stupid they
Speaker 2: kept saying it's gonna be Razors. Then I'm like, this
Speaker 2: is ridiculous, and that Latino thing is dumb as hell.
Speaker 3: Numbers, Well but I been claiming their poll numbers since
Speaker 3: we started getting poles.
Speaker 2: Yeah, of course, but it's dumb as hell, by the way,
Speaker 2: to go into this Latino boat thing, because if you
Speaker 2: just look at forget about the current politics versus old
Speaker 2: school bay blah, forget about all that. If you know
Speaker 2: the Latino community as a whole. Okay, if you combine
Speaker 2: the Latino community into one thing, that's a conservative group.
Speaker 2: It always was. It is not a liberal group.
Speaker 3: The Latin family, they go to church, they go to
Speaker 3: work there, they are a typical example of middle class.
Speaker 2: But even the poor Latino community is conservative minded. They
Speaker 2: just are it's dumb to think any other way about
Speaker 2: that community. If you're trying to put that demographic into
Speaker 2: a spot, it doesn't go liberal. It just doesn't. It
Speaker 2: never did. I knew this just because I interacted with
Speaker 2: the Latino community as a kid.
Speaker 3: Why many, Why do you think so many liberals and
Speaker 3: especially these fundits that we listened to, why do you
Speaker 3: think so many of them say that they would support
Speaker 3: Kamala that sees the person of color and they're people
Speaker 3: of color. And I'm telling you there's so much race
Speaker 3: involved in the media that we're here today. You know,
Speaker 3: it's not a race thing. They make it a race thing.
Speaker 3: I've never seen bigger race baters than what we see
Speaker 3: on NBCCBSCNN, MSNBC, NPR, all of them. They're a bunch
Speaker 3: of race baiting bastards.
Speaker 2: But it's hilarious because, look, seeking to wrangle the black
Speaker 2: vote is one thing. Seeking to wrangle the Latino vote
Speaker 2: is yet another. The Latino vote doesn't go Look, they're brown,
Speaker 2: I'm brown, and they vote. They don't vote that way.
Speaker 2: Now the black vote went that way.
Speaker 3: With It's a good example. There's a there's a little
Speaker 3: town down on the border, I forget the name of it.
Speaker 3: It's like the town is like ninety four percent yea Latino. Okay,
Speaker 3: it can't get more Latino. They haven't voted for a
Speaker 3: Republican in aver one hundred and forty years, and they
Speaker 3: all heard it from Trump. I'm funning that hilarious.
Speaker 2: Okay, well that's interesting. But but my point is that
Speaker 2: generally speaking, that's an aberration usually Latin if you take.
Speaker 3: All this is an aberration. Dude, I have to admit
Speaker 3: I've never seen such stupid educated people as I have.
Speaker 3: And I know this's gonna piss people off that listen,
Speaker 3: and I'm at the point I really don't care. But
Speaker 3: I've never seen more stupid educated people than I have
Speaker 3: on the left end of the spectrum. They come up
Speaker 3: with this. They do they live, They do not understand
Speaker 3: what it is to live in the real world. All Right,
Speaker 3: I want to go so deluded.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I want to transition to the callers here. I
Speaker 2: don't want to keep, you know, banging the same point,
Speaker 2: because I want to get to anybody who calls in,
Speaker 2: and we've got a call her. I was waiting on
Speaker 2: the other night. I was hoping he was going to
Speaker 2: call in last night. But he's calling in the night,
Speaker 2: and I knew he would. Uh, so I want to
Speaker 2: get to him as quickly as possible. And I've already
Speaker 2: been been trying for a couple of minutes here to
Speaker 2: come up with a transition to bring him in a
Speaker 2: little segue, but I keep failing to get there. So
Speaker 2: here it is the guy I was. I've been waiting
Speaker 2: to talk to since Tuesday night, and I decided to
Speaker 2: close the broadcast because it was already a done deal.
Speaker 2: Jimmy James is with us, and uh, I wanted to
Speaker 2: hear from him that night, or like I said, last
Speaker 2: night would have been good too, but he probably figured
Speaker 2: I wasn't going to broadcast last night. Jimmy. Uh, I
Speaker 2: guess you're you're probably happy, uh and uh and all
Speaker 2: that good stuff. So how you doing? What's on your mind?
Speaker 1: Oh? See? I happy now? I want to say that. Uh,
Speaker 1: I'm pleased that a majority of Americans finally voted in
Speaker 1: their self dentist.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm, well we're gonna find out real well.
Speaker 1: Yeah, sorry about on the election night, I just crashed,
Speaker 1: No problem.
Speaker 2: I made it.
Speaker 1: I made it to like seven o'clock or next thing.
Speaker 1: I knew is the next thing.
Speaker 2: No problem. Look, I was shocked that you didn't make
Speaker 2: it there, but uh, I figure you would be. You
Speaker 2: would be thrilled. Now here's the fun part about this now,
Speaker 2: not because of the vote, because the vote could be
Speaker 2: something that was done out of whatever, and you could
Speaker 2: declare this or that or you know, there's a couple
Speaker 2: of people and and it's a very small group, but
Speaker 2: not the general liberals. Nobody's saying that, you know, Trump
Speaker 2: cheated or anything except put out a weird thing about
Speaker 2: it stealing the vote or whatever. But I don't know
Speaker 2: how that's going to roll with anybody. But here's the thing.
Speaker 2: You know, it's it's funny to me because here's the thing.
Speaker 2: If he's got control of every branch of government basically right, Uh,
Speaker 2: he's got the House, the Senate, okay, the the executive branch,
Speaker 2: i e. The presidency, plus the Supreme court's pretty friendly
Speaker 2: to him. Now, anything that gets done good or bad
Speaker 2: or otherwise, you can't really be pissing and moaning about
Speaker 2: them Democrats for the next couple of years because who's
Speaker 2: in charge. And oh, by the way, there's no never
Speaker 2: Trumper's left in the Republicans that that's all been gotten
Speaker 2: rid of. Those people have retired, left their slots, been
Speaker 2: voted out. The party is under his control, and that
Speaker 2: party is in control. So if things go bad, if
Speaker 2: things go good, if we go into some new wars,
Speaker 2: if we got problems, if the economy crashes, if it
Speaker 2: goes stellar and flies right, all that stuff, guess who
Speaker 2: gets to reap that? And that is all GOP. So
Speaker 2: here's the thing.
Speaker 3: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no forget you forget
Speaker 3: what do I forget? We blame it on the best
Speaker 3: Biden left ust. That's what Biden's been doing for the
Speaker 3: past four years is blaming supposedly this mess on Trump,
Speaker 3: who blamed it on Obama, who blamed it on Bush
Speaker 3: who blamed it didn't Well, just because we have all
Speaker 3: three yeah sections of the government, doesn't mean that the
Speaker 3: Democrats aren't going to be causing issues.
Speaker 2: Well, they're not going to happen.
Speaker 3: That's that's your take.
Speaker 1: Along the Trump.
Speaker 2: Well you're not gonna have the power. Yeah, No, I
Speaker 2: want you to, Jimmy, I would love for you to
Speaker 2: speak to this because you know, I know how the
Speaker 2: blame game goes. But reality speaks and what's going to
Speaker 2: happen is the truth is that if Trump.
Speaker 3: Is in their reality when it comes to our government
Speaker 3: in the past fifty years.
Speaker 2: Sure, sure, but for the first year, uh, you know,
Speaker 2: Trump is going to be dealing with whatever Biden left
Speaker 2: and no matter what he does, it's going to take
Speaker 2: him at least a year to change anything pretty much.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 2: And that's that's the reality. I don't think you don't
Speaker 2: think so, okay, well tell me that's where it is.
Speaker 1: But go ahead, No entergy price will be reversed. It's
Speaker 1: in a couple of weeks of him taking office, Okay,
Speaker 1: because of course or speculators will you know that more
Speaker 1: oil is going to be produced in America and not
Speaker 1: sold overseas purposely just drag up the price.
Speaker 3: So what's gonna you know, what's three you know it's
Speaker 3: really going to pick that The butt is when Trump
Speaker 3: decides to issue some permits for another fall uh processing plan.
Speaker 3: That's a problem. We have plenty of gas can't process.
Speaker 1: Okay, he's gonna that that that pipeline that was canceled
Speaker 1: last time. That right there, right off the bat. One
Speaker 1: month after he signs that, gas will go down a
Speaker 1: dollar a gallon and then guess what'll happen to get
Speaker 1: to the prices of groceries and every other good that
Speaker 1: is shipped by tractors. Something it's gonna go down.
Speaker 2: Well, I don't know.
Speaker 1: What what's gonna happen When we close the borders. All
Speaker 1: of a sudden, crime is gonna start going down. Earn
Speaker 1: the students and all of a sudden turns out the borders.
Speaker 1: Why you can enforce the law and keep illegal aliens
Speaker 1: from one hundred to twenty some ore countries out. But
Speaker 1: you know this goal is I knew they lost since
Speaker 1: August twenty twenty two, the minute they invaded Mari Lago.
Speaker 1: It is just a matter of time. And now they
Speaker 1: are going to be fully exposed for what they are.
Speaker 1: And I hope the Congress doesn't even play around, just
Speaker 1: to sign it to real investigators, real agencies to deal
Speaker 1: with these things. Don't waste your time. Put nine hearings
Speaker 1: in Congress. Now just move on with turning this the
Speaker 1: Biden ok Wealth, the Obama Biden Harris the ball situation around.
Speaker 1: I mean, my god, we gotta get this crime and
Speaker 1: place on stack place I got trying to men crawling
Speaker 1: into take you based down the road, take the pictures.
Speaker 1: We gotta get these past. It's time to go.
Speaker 2: So here's my big question for both of you then, okay,
Speaker 2: which is exactly how long will it be before we
Speaker 2: can start saying us not oh well, they're gonna blame
Speaker 2: and Biden did. I don't want to hear about what
Speaker 2: Biden did. How long is it gonna be before we
Speaker 2: not the people that are out there, the usual talking heads,
Speaker 2: but we people that are thinking about this and observing it.
Speaker 2: How long is it going to be before we can say, okay,
Speaker 2: this is now all Trump's responsibility, all the GOP's responsibility,
Speaker 2: since they are going to have control over both houses
Speaker 2: and the Supreme Court and the Executive branch. When is
Speaker 2: it that we can look and go all right, what
Speaker 2: you see now is on them? When does that happen?
Speaker 2: Is it real, real fast? Because the way Jimmy James
Speaker 2: is describing it, we're gonna see instant. Well, let me
Speaker 2: let me ask. Let me get the answer from Jimmy.
Speaker 2: First be Pete and then and then I'll get it
Speaker 2: from you. How's that go ahead?
Speaker 1: Jimmy, Chuck, you just still don't understand.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I do. I'm asking your opinion about something.
Speaker 2: I understand things just fine.
Speaker 1: Please please just let me speak, and then you say whatever.
Speaker 2: I am you're telling me I don't understand though, I'm
Speaker 2: asking you a question, which means I'm looking to you
Speaker 2: to explain.
Speaker 1: The best way to answer. Okay, I want to answer
Speaker 1: the most best way I can answer. The Democratic Party
Speaker 1: does not operate like the Republican Party at all. The
Speaker 1: Republican Party tends to lean toward maintaining, conserving, if you will,
Speaker 1: the Constitution and the government that the damn Documents set up.
Speaker 1: It wasn't set up to be a well, now one
Speaker 1: party's in. It wasn't even supposed to be parties. Each
Speaker 1: layer so called, Yeah, each layer of government was supposed
Speaker 1: to be a check on other layer of governments. In
Speaker 1: other words, the congressional members who agree with the president
Speaker 1: or happens to agree with a bunch of other people
Speaker 1: aren't supposed to. I kind of lost.
Speaker 4: Back somewhere where I's going to.
Speaker 1: Oh, how the Democrat Party operates anyway? Yeah, the Republicans
Speaker 1: are going to stick to constitutionalism. There is going to
Speaker 1: be some balance. I mean, they aren't going clearly, they
Speaker 1: aren't going to let Trump do anything he wants, and
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court sure as hell isn't going to let him. Hollywood.
Speaker 1: John Roberts is a very much an anti Trumper, not
Speaker 1: unlike Mitchell O'Connell, not unlike the former Speaker Ran who
Speaker 1: sabotaged the first two years of Trump's last presidency. So oh,
Speaker 1: I don't think we'll have be seeing any crisises like that.
Speaker 1: The Democrats put party before well, any damn thing, and
Speaker 1: that's just not how the Republicans operate in the main.
Speaker 1: In the main, everyone's an individual, which the Democrats can
Speaker 1: ever accept. They consist that they are all a bunch
Speaker 1: of little subgroups. Oh good luck keeping up that coalition.
Speaker 1: The rest of us are American Americans, and then we're
Speaker 1: going to move on to keep our country strong and
Speaker 1: united on shit that actually matters, not pretend problems to
Speaker 1: live that what you call well communists, the American communists
Speaker 1: make up. The sky is not falling. They are using
Speaker 1: this pretend fairy tale to steal property, steal wealth, bring
Speaker 1: down the middle class. They want us all broke as
Speaker 1: health except for them, of course. They use the government
Speaker 1: to become wealthy. In the main, people who self identify
Speaker 1: as liberal, and let's face it, these terms progress as liberal, conservatives,
Speaker 1: and especially this damnable word democracy. These words have no
Speaker 1: true meaning. Therefore they could be made to mean anything
Speaker 1: anyone wants to say they mean. So they mean nothing
Speaker 1: to me. Words mean nothing to me. Action speaks to me.
Speaker 1: So you say, how long? So I you know, if
Speaker 1: Donald Trump doesn't do the things that he campaigned on,
Speaker 1: I will be one of the first to denounce him
Speaker 1: as a liar. So but I think then.
Speaker 2: So no, it's just my question still is, you know,
Speaker 2: not just Trump, but Trump being the spearhead here of
Speaker 2: the group, right, uh, effectively he is the leader of
Speaker 2: the Republican Party, right, I mean he would be seen
Speaker 2: as the head of the Republican Party at this point
Speaker 2: generally speaking, sorry, yeah, okay, And the Republican Party is
Speaker 2: projected to have control of Congress. Right, most people, regardless
Speaker 2: of what you might think of Roberts or whatever, would
Speaker 2: call the work conservative by majority at this point. So
Speaker 2: you know, that's the Supreme Court. I'm saying that, at
Speaker 2: which point do we start looking at it like they
Speaker 2: do with Biden? At this point, it's all Biden's fault.
Speaker 2: Everything is Biden's fault. He also had the Senate this
Speaker 2: and that. At which point does it change from Biden's
Speaker 2: fault to Trump's fault or Trump's you know, victory or whatever.
Speaker 2: And also the Republicans because they'll they'll be working together
Speaker 2: a lot better than they were during this first term,
Speaker 2: because I don't see the same anti Trump sentiment in
Speaker 2: the GOP as I did. Looks to me like most
Speaker 2: of them have fall.
Speaker 1: You want to know my theory, Sure, Biden blew his
Speaker 1: presidency in six months. So in six months, if Trump
Speaker 1: hasn't made significant progress without having being obstructed in bizarre
Speaker 1: ways where it's not his fault, if he doesn't do
Speaker 1: the things that he said he was going to do
Speaker 1: and campaigned on, I'll be done with him in six months.
Speaker 1: I'll be tired of him.
Speaker 2: So somewhere in July, you're saying around there, if there
Speaker 2: isn't real results by July and he hasn't done what
Speaker 2: it is that he's.
Speaker 1: Sorry, That's about how long it took July or August.
Speaker 1: That's about how long it took Joe Biden to put
Speaker 1: in place all the policies which have gotten us where
Speaker 1: we are today.
Speaker 4: Okay, first day in.
Speaker 1: Fact, he said, pretty much all of the world we're
Speaker 1: living in now in the progress with his idiotic power policies.
Speaker 1: People are policies, policies made by people. There are no institutions,
Speaker 1: not in this fucking country. And if you go against
Speaker 1: the constitution, regardless of who you are, and you choose
Speaker 1: to serve in the government, and if you cross the
Speaker 1: lines constitutionally of what you're supposed to be doing, because
Speaker 1: of course the constitution governs the government, not the people.
Speaker 1: That's what the damn laws which become coded and then
Speaker 1: become code do. And quite frankly, we need to just
Speaker 1: there needs to be some serious code reform, tort reform.
Speaker 1: I mean, it just goes on and on. We just
Speaker 1: got to hit some of the biggest things so we
Speaker 1: can uh had Harris one this republic when iut have
Speaker 1: left stood in other four years. There's no damn way.
Speaker 2: Okay, Now.
Speaker 1: We would like to sing a little saw well, just
Speaker 1: a little a little jig in honor of historic vice
Speaker 1: president mm hmm uh to to see good bye. Don't
Speaker 1: at the door, hit you order the good Lord, split you,
Speaker 1: you old bitch of saurus.
Speaker 2: Bitch a saurus. All right, I'm putting you on hold
Speaker 2: Jimmy James because I want to get BPTE a chance
Speaker 2: to answer the same question uninterrupted. And BP do you
Speaker 2: remember the question?
Speaker 3: Yeah, how long before y'all can start pitching about all
Speaker 3: Republicans being in charge of everything?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Basically? Or how long before we credit.
Speaker 3: Has already started we're talking about Look, you're talking about
Speaker 3: a group of people who just spent billions of dollars
Speaker 3: to try to keep Trump from getting into office.
Speaker 2: But I don't care about that. I'm not talking about that.
Speaker 3: No, wait a minute, but don't what you have to
Speaker 3: care about it, because that's the background of the situation.
Speaker 3: You can't just dismiss it because all of a sudden
Speaker 3: things change. The people that made this country a living
Speaker 3: hell for the past four years still have power right now.
Speaker 3: So and these are the same people that had us
Speaker 3: to believe that Trump hired a bunch of hookers to
Speaker 3: whiz on a mattress because Obama slept on it in
Speaker 3: a hotel in Russia for four years. We had put
Speaker 3: up with that for four years. And so they're immediately
Speaker 3: going to blame Republicans for everything. You know, there's some
Speaker 3: things that are going to come up here that are
Speaker 3: going to pop seniors and people on Medicare because of
Speaker 3: increased costs, and people don't realize it yet, but they're
Speaker 3: getting ready to. Some people are going to have one
Speaker 3: hundred and seventy nine percent premium increases because of the
Speaker 3: crap pulled on by the existing establishment right now, those
Speaker 3: things are going to hit here in the next month
Speaker 3: or two people who are start screaming that they can't
Speaker 3: afford their medic character premiums because Biden's been flogging it
Speaker 3: right now. He didn't want it to hit. It was
Speaker 3: supposed to hit before the election, right before the election,
Speaker 3: but no, they hit that. They covered it up with
Speaker 3: the insurance companies and paid them money to stay quiet
Speaker 3: about it, and now we're going to get hit with it.
Speaker 3: So there's a lot of this stuff that's going to
Speaker 3: come up. But I guarantee you they're going to be
Speaker 3: blaming Republicans as soon as they're all in office. What
Speaker 3: Congress gets sworn in on is it the third somewhere
Speaker 3: around there, and then on the twentieth is when you
Speaker 3: have the president sworn in. So yeah, we're going to
Speaker 3: be having issues with Congress the minute these guys are
Speaker 3: sworn in I guarantee it. It's going to happen. You
Speaker 3: know it's going to happen. So at what time are
Speaker 3: the Republicans supposed to take responsibility if things go bad?
Speaker 3: It depends on the argument of the day, and it
Speaker 3: depends on the issue because they got a lot of
Speaker 3: stuff to fix and they can't do it overnight.
Speaker 2: My view is, this is what I'm talking about, is
Speaker 2: it's going to happen. An honest view of this, an
Speaker 2: honest view, not what the Democrats are gonna say, or
Speaker 2: what they could say, or what I don't care about that,
Speaker 2: And it's irrelevant because look, clearly, if you believe that
Speaker 2: the election.
Speaker 3: No it's not irrelevant, Chuck, you can't dismiss it because
Speaker 3: it takes up so much of time and money to
Speaker 3: put up with that crap in the halls of Congress.
Speaker 2: And if you think that.
Speaker 3: The doesn't have anything to do with it because it's gonna.
Speaker 2: Happen, no, it doesn't have anything to do with what
Speaker 2: I'm asking because look, if you think that the election
Speaker 2: was legitimate, then therefore a majority of the voting public
Speaker 2: rejected all of the crap you're talking about. Because if
Speaker 2: they didn't reject it, then they wouldn't have voted for him,
Speaker 2: you know what I'm saying, And they voted for him overwhelmingly,
Speaker 2: even in places where they did.
Speaker 3: The opportunity, okay, So the opportunity for those that don't
Speaker 3: like what's going on to complain about the Republicans and
Speaker 3: expect the Republicans to take blame for it is the
Speaker 3: day they get sworn in, because that's what it's going
Speaker 3: to start.
Speaker 2: But that's not realistic. You and I know that I'm
Speaker 2: not talking about.
Speaker 3: It's more realistic than anything you're trying to strive at.
Speaker 3: What is it that you want You want to say? Okay, well,
Speaker 3: in six months, if this had happened and that had happened,
Speaker 3: we can blame the Republicans. You can do that from
Speaker 3: day one.
Speaker 2: Well in your okay, but I'm asking about you. But
Speaker 2: I'm asking about you. I'm asking about you, not you're
Speaker 2: not convinced by the democratic arguments. The democratic arguments have
Speaker 2: nothing to do with the conclusions you're going to come to.
Speaker 2: I'm asking about you. At what point would you say
Speaker 2: that people that are not swayed by this, that are
Speaker 2: not convinced on the democratic side, the the not the
Speaker 2: psycho Trump's supporter who's absolute and he can do no wrong.
Speaker 2: I mean somebody who's looking at this objectively and you, okay,
Speaker 2: how what point would you say he becomes responsible for
Speaker 2: what is not what the Democrats are going to say responsible.
Speaker 6: That's just it.
Speaker 3: Trump's not going to become responsible for it because he's
Speaker 3: not running again.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 3: He's got four years to do what he's gonna do.
Speaker 3: And at the end of that four years, if he
Speaker 3: lived up to what he said he was going to do,
Speaker 3: history will show it. If he doesn't bitch about it,
Speaker 3: ain't gonna change nothing. But then you can start blaming
Speaker 3: the next administration that comes in because they can blame
Speaker 3: it all on Trump. That's reality.
Speaker 2: Of course they can. It doesn't matter if they're GOP,
Speaker 2: if they're connected to his side or they're on the
Speaker 2: other side. They can always blame it on their predecessor.
Speaker 2: But that's not what I'm asking about. What I'm asking
Speaker 2: about is somebody who is not swayed by either side,
Speaker 2: somebody who is just looking at this and saying that point.
Speaker 3: Chuck, every individual is different. Do you want me to
Speaker 3: get you a date that the whole collective can say, Okay,
Speaker 3: it's now the sixth of May twenty twenty five, and
Speaker 3: we can legitimately bitch now I'm blame Republicans for everything. No,
Speaker 3: but not today. But the individual is going to Yeah.
Speaker 2: And it's not just about I'm going to it's not
Speaker 2: just about blaming water. No, it's see, that's not the
Speaker 2: whole of the question I'm asking You're hearing one version
Speaker 2: of this somehow I'm not getting I'm not articulating it correctly.
Speaker 2: The thing is, I'm asking you, when you would say
Speaker 2: they become responsible for either the failures or successes of
Speaker 2: what's happening, when does that happen?
Speaker 3: Well, my opinion, yes, my opinion, we hold them responsible
Speaker 3: the day they're sworn in for everything that they do
Speaker 3: after that.
Speaker 2: Okay, But even though you know I'm not a Trump fan,
Speaker 2: I'm not going to sit here the day after he's
Speaker 2: an augury either. Well, okay, but I'm not even remotely
Speaker 2: close to being on his side. The thing is this,
Speaker 2: even though the day after he's inaugurated, he's not responsible
Speaker 2: for the condition of the country, not immediately.
Speaker 3: Because he's responsible, he's responsible from day one for what
Speaker 3: he does about it. No, absolutely, absolutely, However, he reacts. Yes,
Speaker 3: that's what we hold him responsible for.
Speaker 2: Yes, And how he.
Speaker 3: Reacts and how he tries to fix the situation, yes,
Speaker 3: and being logical, and that's being reasonable.
Speaker 2: True. But here's what's also logical and reasonable. I can't
Speaker 2: say the day after he's inaugurated that he's responsible for
Speaker 2: the inflation that's in place. That didn't happen overnight. It
Speaker 2: happened way before he got there, right, So therefore I
Speaker 2: can't blame it on him at that point. And I
Speaker 2: can't give him credit for if something starts to go
Speaker 2: right somehow weirdly, you know, in December, Like in December,
Speaker 2: everything gets wonderful in America all of a sudden, I
Speaker 2: can't say, well, that's Trump. I mean, I could say
Speaker 2: that some people are getting excited and changing their behaviors
Speaker 2: in anticipation of him coming into office. I could say that,
Speaker 2: like you see changes in the stock market right around
Speaker 2: those times and all that kind of stuff. But see,
Speaker 2: I don't play the stock market, and most people don't.
Speaker 2: Here's the thing.
Speaker 3: At what point, Yes, most people do well, most well,
Speaker 3: actually most people do through their four oh one ks
Speaker 3: and their retirement plans. Many more people have them now
Speaker 3: and people are involved in the stock market and they
Speaker 3: don't realize to what degree they are.
Speaker 2: But continue, how many Americans have four a one case?
Speaker 2: A lot, a lot? Okay, but is that remotely close
Speaker 2: to a majority of Americans?
Speaker 3: I have no idea, But a lot of people that's
Speaker 3: what your pension is now is a four to oh
Speaker 3: one k to where you work or part one that
Speaker 3: you had where a place you worked and you left
Speaker 3: and you really don't realize it. But the thing has
Speaker 3: still been growing money. Yeah, a lot of people are
Speaker 3: in the stock market. A lot of people that don't
Speaker 3: think they're in the stock market are in the stock market.
Speaker 2: To my thinking, the majority of people do not have
Speaker 2: four to one case.
Speaker 3: Okay, well so, but but what's the point. What does
Speaker 3: that have to do with Now you're saying, Okay, you
Speaker 3: can't hold him responsible for the inflation that happened before
Speaker 3: he got there, But you want to know when you
Speaker 3: can hold him responsible for the inflation if it doesn't
Speaker 3: get better or it gets worse. Well, you can hold
Speaker 3: him responsible from day one because his actions are going
Speaker 3: to reflect in whether inflation goes up and down. So
Speaker 3: if he's doing something to make it go down, you
Speaker 3: can give him credit for it, you said yourself, Well,
Speaker 3: if it's good, indeed, I can't really give him credit
Speaker 3: if it's good in December all of a sudden, we
Speaker 3: have a good month. Yeah, you can. But you can
Speaker 3: also say if it's the other way, that his policies
Speaker 3: aren't working and it needs changing.
Speaker 2: Okay. According to Census, dot gov and about four other
Speaker 2: fairly interesting resources and the AI gathering that Google does,
Speaker 2: there's about seventy million Americans who are taking part in
Speaker 2: four oh one case. So that's a lot of people.
Speaker 2: Sure is it's not half though, It's not half of
Speaker 2: the population, right, So okay, I'm just saying, what is
Speaker 2: the percentage of the population? Right? How many people are
Speaker 2: there in the US that they could count as Americans? Right?
Speaker 2: It's not half, not close, Okay. That's all I was
Speaker 2: trying to get at is the majority of people are
Speaker 2: not engaged in the stock market. That's all I was saying,
Speaker 2: Not that there's not a lot of people that are.
Speaker 2: There's a lot. Sure, there is seventy million. There. You
Speaker 2: go about and they say that there's actually plans that
Speaker 2: hold the seven point four trillion, Those seventy million hold
Speaker 2: seven point four trillion. That's wild too. That's a lot
Speaker 2: of money actually held by them, isn't it anyway? Yeah,
Speaker 2: seven point four trillion. That's retirees and people that are
Speaker 2: act we still collecting into them, and et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2: That's what they say. Uh, And let's see there's uh,
Speaker 2: there's private and public entities that pretty much agree on. Yeah,
Speaker 2: a number that looks like about the same. I see
Speaker 2: somebody says it's about eighty one million Americans.
Speaker 3: I'm looking up right now, the number of working age
Speaker 3: adults in the US. Let's see, Well, we need to
Speaker 3: look at right, let's just say working age or do
Speaker 3: we need to define it as working people?
Speaker 2: Yeah, and what would you define that as? Eighteen to seventy.
Speaker 3: Fifteen to sixty four is what this place ers is?
Speaker 2: Okay, eighteen to sixty four.
Speaker 7: And so you're looking at two hundred five million plus
Speaker 7: or minus, saying in twenty twenty to two hundred and
Speaker 7: five million, So.
Speaker 2: It's about a third let's say approx. One third of
Speaker 2: the working age people that they counted are engaged on
Speaker 2: the stock market, about right? Yeah, No, hey, not saying
Speaker 2: it's not a lot, just saying it's not the majority.
Speaker 2: That's all I was getting at. You know, a lot
Speaker 2: of people voted for Kamala supposedly doesn't mean the majority.
Speaker 2: Did there You go just.
Speaker 3: Saying, so, what's your point? What point is there's a
Speaker 3: lot of people in the stock market that you're not
Speaker 3: taking in consideration. But I am stock market.
Speaker 2: That is a lot of people, and I am taking
Speaker 2: into consideration. My only major statement was most people the
Speaker 2: majority are not, not that there's not a lot, and
Speaker 2: I'm not taking I'm not missing anybody on it. I'm
Speaker 2: just saying the majority or not. If there's two less
Speaker 2: people you know, in that are out, it's still not
Speaker 2: the majority, is it?
Speaker 3: To your point, there's not Okay, the majority is not
Speaker 3: in the stock market. Get to the point you were
Speaker 3: getting there?
Speaker 2: Okay, you know what, I don't really have a point,
Speaker 2: I guess because I'm just trying to point out that
Speaker 2: at some point you're going to have to accept that
Speaker 2: they are responsible. The GOP entirely will be responsible for
Speaker 2: the direction of things because they have control of the
Speaker 2: majority of all the levers in government. At a certain point,
Speaker 2: it's not going to be the day after Trump is
Speaker 2: inaugurated or the day after Congress goes to, uh, you know,
Speaker 2: be sworn in. It's not going to be the day
Speaker 2: after because they will be inheriting the circumstance. So at
Speaker 2: a certain point, so we.
Speaker 3: Agreed on the fact that eventually the Republicans are going
Speaker 3: to be responsible for whatever's going on.
Speaker 2: Yeah, what is what.
Speaker 3: Is the point about when you can hold them responsible?
Speaker 3: That's the part I don't understand.
Speaker 2: That's all I want to know is when.
Speaker 3: Responsible from day one? Okay, the Democrats hold them responsible
Speaker 3: from thirty years ago.
Speaker 2: But see, I don't care when the Democrats hold You're
Speaker 2: saying the day after you can immediately. I'm asking realistically,
Speaker 2: when can we turn around and if things are great
Speaker 2: in the country we can say, hey, it's great because
Speaker 2: of these people. Or if everything really sucks, when is
Speaker 2: the time we can say, you know what, it all
Speaker 2: sucks because Trump and the rest of the GOP.
Speaker 3: When it's going to be up to the individual?
Speaker 2: Okay, well fine, so you don't have an answer that
Speaker 2: you want to give definitively for you, because I'm asking.
Speaker 3: When I do have an answer?
Speaker 8: I told you, Okay, Oh, why these conversations go off
Speaker 8: of these firals by it like this, Chuck, I told you,
Speaker 8: I personally hold them responsible from the day that they
Speaker 8: start doing things to try to change things, and I
Speaker 8: hold them accountable for that.
Speaker 3: And somebody else may wait and let it go a
Speaker 3: year and see if things are better off, or see
Speaker 3: what their tax return looks like. Hey, I got more
Speaker 3: money back, I must be better. Oh wait a minute,
Speaker 3: I just noticed at the grocery store, I'm spending seventy
Speaker 3: five dollars less this week. Wow, it's going to be
Speaker 3: different for everybody now. As a collective group. The left
Speaker 3: side of the aisle is already blaming Republicans for let's see,
Speaker 3: there's going to be a nationwide abortion and band I
Speaker 3: didn't realize that Social Security is ending, and I didn't
Speaker 3: realize that was gonna happen. Somehow. They're building these internment camps,
Speaker 3: and I'm wondering if it was the same THEMA camps
Speaker 3: that we heard about, you know, twelve years ago.
Speaker 2: So well, those FEMA camps I've been waiting on since
Speaker 2: w was in office. So I don't know, it's been
Speaker 2: a while, you know, right when they started retrofitting some
Speaker 2: of the closed military bases back in what was it,
Speaker 2: two thousand and five or two thousand and four. I've
Speaker 2: been waiting for these FEMA camps since then.
Speaker 3: Or are they going to turn it into an industry
Speaker 3: like prisons, privatize them and somebody makes money off these
Speaker 3: internment camps.
Speaker 2: Well, of course they'll do that, But I mean, but
Speaker 2: when is that operation coming to fruition? Hasn't now For
Speaker 2: the past geez, twenty plus years, I've been waiting on
Speaker 2: those I know.
Speaker 3: But for the past the past one hundred and seven days,
Speaker 3: we've been told it's going to happen as soon as
Speaker 3: Trump gets in. Oh you bad, I got a bad pattern.
Speaker 2: Okay, well, a lot of things are going to happen
Speaker 2: right away according to but realistically, so you're saying they
Speaker 2: can be held accountable immediately, But I'm saying on day
Speaker 2: two I would not turn around and say, well, Trump
Speaker 2: is responsible for the mess wearing I you know, or
Speaker 2: Trump is responsible because things are going good. Let's just
Speaker 2: say things magically all turn around by January.
Speaker 3: He takes off what you surprise us when you reach
Speaker 3: that conclusion that things are either going good or bad
Speaker 3: and you want to hold all the GOP responsible for it,
Speaker 3: and we will celebrate, Well, we do show on it.
Speaker 2: No, that's but that's what I wanted to ask is
Speaker 2: when do you think do you have an idea as
Speaker 2: to when that'll be? And your thing is your idea
Speaker 2: is immediately they're responsible, But.
Speaker 3: I have no idea when anybody is going to hold
Speaker 3: a group of individuals in Washington responsible for anything? Well,
Speaker 3: when will you put it on the group that that
Speaker 3: person is a member of. It is going to be
Speaker 3: different times for different things.
Speaker 4: That's like our court.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 3: You say the Supreme Court can be looked at as conservative. Yes,
Speaker 3: they were chosen as conservatives, but as we have seen,
Speaker 3: there are three members of the supposedly conservative side that
Speaker 3: have been really quite liberal on things. So I mean
Speaker 3: take that into consideration.
Speaker 2: Okay, but when would you forget about the groups? Because
Speaker 2: I don't think you count yourself as part of any
Speaker 2: of the groups you've mentioned so far, So when would
Speaker 2: you call it? You? No group?
Speaker 3: I don't know. I guess I'm part of the get
Speaker 3: off my lawn demographic and I will hold them responsible
Speaker 3: from day one, and anybody else that's in their position,
Speaker 3: regardless of which side of the aisle they set their
Speaker 3: butt on, I will hold them responsible from day one.
Speaker 3: That's me. I can't tell you about anybody else. Collectively.
Speaker 3: Let it go a year, I'll tell you what chuck.
Speaker 3: Year from today, we will not allow you to have
Speaker 3: any complaints about the government. And in one year then
Speaker 3: you can tell us if you hold the response, hold
Speaker 3: them responsible for either good stuff or bad stuff, and
Speaker 3: you can give us a list.
Speaker 2: M Okay, fair enough, but but I'm not looking for it.
Speaker 2: I was just curious when I should start looking to
Speaker 2: count it, that's all. I just want to know when
Speaker 2: that happens in the minds of people that are happy
Speaker 2: about what's happened here, that's all I want to know.
Speaker 2: That's all I wanted to know.
Speaker 3: It's not the ones that you know, really though. So
Speaker 3: you want to pin those people that are glad that
Speaker 3: Trump won now, you want to be able to have
Speaker 3: a quarter you can back them into based on a
Speaker 3: certain amount of time, to say, well, hey, you guys
Speaker 3: had everything. You know. Of course, in two years we're
Speaker 3: probably going to lose the house, because that usually is
Speaker 3: what happens. Yeah, this in the next midterm, we losing,
Speaker 3: So not four years, we're looking at two years.
Speaker 2: Almost always exactly, almost always, that's what happens. I mean, look,
Speaker 2: during Trump's first two years, he had control of both
Speaker 2: you know, House and Senate. If you take a look
Speaker 2: at the uh, you know, the party. But he had
Speaker 2: a resistance in his party then, which everybody claimed sabotaged it,
Speaker 2: And I get it. So I'm saying now that resistance
Speaker 2: is definitely not the same as it was in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 3: There is still some there. It's not to the degree
Speaker 3: that it was, but there is still resistance within the party.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But he went from fighting people. Yeah, but he
Speaker 2: went from the.
Speaker 3: Old schoolers to don't want Trump in the party.
Speaker 2: Okay, maybe, but he went from arguing with the Speaker
Speaker 2: of the House to basically them checking with him about
Speaker 2: their pick per Speaker of the House. So, I mean,
Speaker 2: there is definitely a change here that has occurred. And
Speaker 2: a whole lot of never Trump people retired, didn't run again,
Speaker 2: We're voted out.
Speaker 3: Oh you got another big change. You got Mitch McConnell
Speaker 3: who's not gonna run again, and he's stepping down his
Speaker 3: head and Senate, right, he has control of it. He's
Speaker 3: stepping down and.
Speaker 2: If he actually steps down, yeah, that'll be interesting because
Speaker 2: I didn't think he would. I figured they'd be carrying
Speaker 2: him out of their dead.
Speaker 3: But yeah, well no, he's already said he's not real
Speaker 3: running for reelection. So I know what he said, step down.
Speaker 3: I know, you know, McConnell. Until you get rid of
Speaker 3: the McConnell's and the Nadlers and the Pelosis and people
Speaker 3: like that, they're still going to have chaos, nolet of
Speaker 3: what's going on, no matter who's in charge, chaos.
Speaker 2: Pre Trump era, I figured that you would have carried
Speaker 2: McConnell out of there as a corpse. Okay, but okay, yeah, fine,
Speaker 2: he says he's on his way out. But my point is,
Speaker 2: this is not the same party that Trump had in
Speaker 2: his first two years of his first term. It's a
Speaker 2: party it's totally different. It's a party now that dedicates
Speaker 2: its whole convention to him. It's a party now that
Speaker 2: listens to him. It's a party now that contains a
Speaker 2: whole lot more than just a small squad of members
Speaker 2: on his side in Congress. So it's different.
Speaker 3: He but he at least at least you have to
Speaker 3: give the GOP credit. They did have primaries and there
Speaker 3: were individuals that got I mean, look at the Santus.
Speaker 3: How much would this thing have changed if the Santas
Speaker 3: hadn't have been in it at the beginning. So yeah,
Speaker 3: there's a big difference sound in the Republican Party. But
Speaker 3: Trump wanted fair and square. He got the support of
Speaker 3: the party, he went through the primary process, he won,
Speaker 3: he went to the convention, he was the candidate, and
Speaker 3: he really kicked ask.
Speaker 2: Well, there you have it. So the point is, though,
Speaker 2: so you're saying, we'll have to wait and see when
Speaker 2: it is that they'll actually be responsible for this situation
Speaker 2: for the whole of the situation, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, We're gonna have to sit and wait and see
Speaker 3: until a bunch of people start bitching it they don't
Speaker 3: like what's going on and they blame the Republicans. I
Speaker 3: can't tell you the date that's going to happen. Oh yeah,
Speaker 3: but yeah, I'm not on the right side of things.
Speaker 2: Well no, look, moronic people are going to do it
Speaker 2: within twenty four hours of them being sworn in. They're
Speaker 2: going to do it ahead of them being most of them.
Speaker 3: Are on the left side of things. So though we
Speaker 3: were tired of listening to them, it's just a drone.
Speaker 3: But that's just the rational media craft. That's all it is,
Speaker 3: is just drone. It's background noise.
Speaker 2: But that's just a ration basically. That's like you know what,
Speaker 2: that's like letting me become the manager of a restaurant.
Speaker 2: You're blaming me for the fact that people were serving
Speaker 2: bad food two weeks ago. I wasn't here yet, you know,
Speaker 2: it's it's no good. So anyway, at a certain point though,
Speaker 2: and it again, it could be success. It's not all
Speaker 2: about the negativity necessarily. At what point do they own it?
Speaker 2: That's all I'm looking for. And uh so you've got
Speaker 2: a different answer than Jimmy James's. Yeah good.
Speaker 3: They don't own it. They don't own it. I mean legitimately,
Speaker 3: they don't own it until they implement measures and they
Speaker 3: see what those measures do, and if they don't pay
Speaker 3: off and not change their measures, then they own it.
Speaker 3: It's like, you know, you pick it up, you break it,
Speaker 3: you bought it.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah no, And it used to be under normal circumstances.
Speaker 2: I got to tell you that the first year of
Speaker 2: any presidency, I would say that their regime is not responsible.
Speaker 2: Usually that's the way it used to be, because they're
Speaker 2: still dealing with what was left.
Speaker 3: To them from the last the GOP the first year,
Speaker 3: just to wipe out some of the stuff that's getting
Speaker 3: ready to hit the fan. Yeah, it'll take them at
Speaker 3: least a year to do that, Okay.
Speaker 2: But see that was the past, and so I'm curious
Speaker 2: if people think, you know what computer age, you know,
Speaker 2: things are a little different. Certain things don't have to
Speaker 2: be moved physically anymore now they move electronically. There's different
Speaker 2: speeds at which information travels, et cetera, et cetera. So,
Speaker 2: you know, like I said, all the time I was
Speaker 2: growing up, when you saw a new president come in,
Speaker 2: I felt as though it was improper to blame the
Speaker 2: new president for at least a year before they could
Speaker 2: even possibly implement and get anything running. Now, the way
Speaker 2: I understand it today is that's a lot shorter of
Speaker 2: a period and it's more like what Jimmy James said.
Speaker 2: The way I understand it, that's more realistic. Now people
Speaker 2: are going to scream and cry or claim successes that
Speaker 2: don't belong to them the next day. It's just the
Speaker 2: way it's gonna be. But that's not the realistic end
Speaker 2: of it. I was curious what somebody who was happy
Speaker 2: about this would say about when it is it's owned
Speaker 2: by their decision, by their guy, by their party that
Speaker 2: they supported here, When is it that they are now
Speaker 2: responsible for the good, the bad, the ugly, and whatever
Speaker 2: the hell else comes along with it in America? When
Speaker 2: does that happen? And I want to know what you
Speaker 2: guys thought. So I got Jimmy James and I basically
Speaker 2: got you on it as to when you think it is.
Speaker 2: But your answer is a little little different. There you go. Anyway,
Speaker 2: anybody else wants to have into, you know, a discussion
Speaker 2: like this or some other or you got something else
Speaker 2: on your mind, call us join in. Three one nine,
Speaker 2: five two seven five zero one six. We're already an
Speaker 2: hour deep plus into this show, so I'm gonna take
Speaker 2: a break, but I'd love to hear from more, and
Speaker 2: if not, we'll go back and get Jimmy James on
Speaker 2: the line again and let him roll out whatever's on
Speaker 2: his mind. But uh, that was one question I had,
Speaker 2: and I'm not sure if we're gonna have time for
Speaker 2: me to ask another if it keeps up like this,
Speaker 2: So join in and throw something else on the table,
Speaker 2: or join into the existing discussion, whatever you would like,
Speaker 2: because it is the open mic here on the Ocelli effect.
Speaker 2: Three one nine five two seven, five zero one six
Speaker 2: three one nine five two seven five zero one six
Speaker 2: join us, We'll return Me and b Pete and Jimmy
Speaker 2: James hanging on the line. After this.
Speaker 5: Revelation, through conversation.
Speaker 9: The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national
Speaker 9: transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in
Speaker 9: the context of the Times and reveals never before published
Speaker 9: information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not
Speaker 9: have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred
Speaker 9: years ago. His assassination took place in the context of
Speaker 9: the Cold War and the rise of the national security state.
Speaker 9: Before World War II, the United States was a continental republic.
Speaker 9: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower.
Speaker 9: Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 9: but knew that there were short range missiles on the
Speaker 9: island arn't with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy
Speaker 9: because they were on mobile launcher. Their invasion could have
Speaker 9: led to a Third World War, and they wanted to
Speaker 9: go to war anyway. The war State by Michael Swanson
Speaker 9: reveals why and we'll show you what President Kennedy was
Speaker 9: up against. For more information, the War State dot com,
Speaker 9: Ochilli dot com.
Speaker 1: This is James Corbin at coorper report dot com.
Speaker 10: And you're listening to the o'ceelly affected o'helly dot com.
Speaker 5: Do you like history? Real history that you were never
Speaker 5: taught in schools? Why the Vietnam War Nuclear Bombs in
Speaker 5: nation Building in Southeast Asia by author Mike Swanson with
Speaker 5: new documentation never seen before that'll open your eyes to
Speaker 5: events that led up to this. Why the Vietnam War
Speaker 5: Nuclear Bombs in Nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty
Speaker 5: five through nineteen sixty one. Get your copy today at
Speaker 5: Amazon dot com. Why the Vietnam War by author Mike
Speaker 5: Swanson Nuclear Holocaust.
Speaker 11: You know what uranium is, right, think called nuclear weapons
Speaker 11: and other things like lots of you know what uranium is, right?
Speaker 11: Bad things things have done with uranium, including some bad uncle.
Speaker 12: Do you remember that time when Benjamin Fulford said that
Speaker 12: an Asian secret society was going to dispatch ninjas to
Speaker 12: take down the Illuminati.
Speaker 10: Oh that's interesting, yeah in the Claton?
Speaker 12: Yeah did that ever work out? Too good. No, it didn't,
Speaker 12: did it. But here on o'celly dot com Radio Network,
Speaker 12: things work out a bit better, don't they much better?
Speaker 10: Much is clear and understanding about the programs, The programs
Speaker 10: much clearer, getting live people into it. They really have
Speaker 10: a good conversation going much better, much better scene.
Speaker 12: I say, forget Benjamin Fulford and his ninjas and listen
Speaker 12: to the ocelly dot Com Radio Network.
Speaker 10: I agree, it's straight to the point, straight talk, and
Speaker 10: I like that idea dot com dot com let.
Speaker 5: Them know, let.
Speaker 2: Got to let them know.
Speaker 3: I'm bringing all shock luck and tear rocks and the
Speaker 3: bull light up the drug show. I'm bringing all shot
Speaker 3: at and tear rocks and the bullerlight at the drug shows.
Speaker 2: The woe is meth that the world's worst professional broocket
Speaker 2: tools took them like its two thousands something and Bucker's
Speaker 2: mack on tour.
Speaker 6: Yo Yo. This Doug Campbell, host of the Dallas Action
Speaker 6: Podcast presented by Wall Street Window, and you are listening
Speaker 6: to the o'chill Effect Revelation through Conversation.
Speaker 4: Shelly dot Com Radio Network Shelley dot Com Radio networkk.
Speaker 5: Revelation through Conversation.
Speaker 12: M hmm, Get.
Speaker 1: Ready, get ready for you're chilling at that.
Speaker 2: Hey. For a minute there, I thought I might have
Speaker 2: lost my phone lines, but I didn't. So here we
Speaker 2: are back, second segment and probably not going to take
Speaker 2: another break, and we're going till ten pm Eastern when
Speaker 2: the Age of Transitions will begin with Aaron Franz. Now,
Speaker 2: I think I'm not sure if he'll be there next week,
Speaker 2: but uh, in two weeks, I won't be here because
Speaker 2: I'll be at the JFK Lancer Conference and uh should
Speaker 2: only miss one Friday for that. We shall see though, uh,
Speaker 2: because I'll be traveling before Friday, get there on Friday,
Speaker 2: and should be returning home Sunday night. So it is
Speaker 2: what it is, was what it was going to be,
Speaker 2: and guess what it is tonight. You can join in
Speaker 2: to this conversation at three one nine five two seven
Speaker 2: five zero one six three one nine five two seven
Speaker 2: five zero one six. That's the number to call, and
Speaker 2: whatever you want to bring up. You don't got to
Speaker 2: talk about the selection if you don't want to, but
Speaker 2: you could, or you could bring up whatever else is
Speaker 2: on your mind. I still got Jimmy James on hold,
Speaker 2: and I got my cos Bpete with me, and so
Speaker 2: far we got some interesting answers about when it is
Speaker 2: the GOP and Trump owned the situation in the US.
Speaker 2: But that's about as far as I got. And we
Speaker 2: also let Jimmy talk about what the Democrats are going
Speaker 2: to do, had Pete tell us about what they do,
Speaker 2: what they're going to do, where the blame goes, etc. Etc.
Speaker 2: It's interesting to watch how they're trying to blame each
Speaker 2: other for this loss. Fascinating that they haven't realistically taken
Speaker 2: into account. I forget who said it earlier, but how
Speaker 2: about you just recognize that Kamala sucked as a candidate.
Speaker 2: How about that? And now about there was no legitimate
Speaker 2: good opponent for Trump entered here. Sleepy Joe, sleepy Joe.
Speaker 2: He wasn't even asleep, he was just out of it.
Speaker 2: I don't know anyway, Slow Joe, crashed out Joe. There's
Speaker 2: got to be a better phrase for him. But nobody
Speaker 2: cares anymore, even though he's allegedly the president at the moment.
Speaker 2: Right anyway, he.
Speaker 3: Is what he is to beat Trump.
Speaker 2: He inspired the garbage truck and hey, guess what it
Speaker 2: is true he's the only one who did beat Trump. Right,
Speaker 2: So he's the guy.
Speaker 3: That's why I think the happiest guy with this whole
Speaker 3: election return was Joe Budden.
Speaker 2: Well, he can definitely do the I told you, you know, Yeah,
Speaker 2: would he have beaten him this time? I don't think so.
Speaker 2: But guess what, we never got to try that, so
Speaker 2: we don't know for certain. And he can just say, look,
Speaker 2: the only time I ran against him, I beat him. Right.
Speaker 2: So there it is, Joe Biden proven correct. I'm the
Speaker 2: only guy who beat Trump. Still true anyway, So should
Speaker 2: we go back to Jimmy James beat Pete? Or I mean,
Speaker 2: do you do you have a special way that we
Speaker 2: could encourage somebody else's listening to call in? What do
Speaker 2: you think?
Speaker 3: Yeah, let's go bring Jimmy back home.
Speaker 2: Okay, So Jimmy, no more questions from me. What else
Speaker 2: you got on your mind? Anything you want to bring up,
Speaker 2: or anything you noticed that you thought was entertaining recently. Whatever, Man,
Speaker 2: it's all on you floor is yours.
Speaker 1: Well, I think you, as a private broadcaster have great
Speaker 1: opportunity going forward. The old dinosaur media is the selection
Speaker 1: proves it. They are no longer important at all the
Speaker 1: movie industry as it was is gone. That's dead. That's
Speaker 1: over with television as an industry as it was known
Speaker 1: as gone. That is dead. That is over with even
Speaker 1: traditional so called television and news channels. That's done. That's
Speaker 1: over with MHM. Streaming is the current main way in
Speaker 1: which Americans consume.
Speaker 2: So did you did you read all the Jimmy Let
Speaker 2: me just ask you something, because it's interesting what you're saying.
Speaker 2: Did you read a whole bunch of articles that came
Speaker 2: out in the past couple of days basically stating that
Speaker 2: podcasts and uh, you know, broadcasters that are not part
Speaker 2: of the dinosaur media pretty much were the influencers said
Speaker 2: for this campaign. It was like the campaign of the
Speaker 2: podcast according to a whole bunch of different opinion pieces.
Speaker 2: Are you saying that you agree with that? I mean
Speaker 2: from the Joe Roman factor on down good.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. Joe Rogan is far more.
Speaker 2: Relevant, well.
Speaker 1: Respected, I guess, seen as a He's at least seen
Speaker 1: as someone who is trying to be there and get
Speaker 1: to truth and nobody and there are no Walter Cronkites,
Speaker 1: there are no Roger mudds. Hell, there aren't even any
Speaker 1: that guy that used to be on the Sunday Show
Speaker 1: in the morning. He was all right? Was his name, Big.
Speaker 2: Tom Snyder?
Speaker 1: No, no, No, the guy that hosted NBC's version of
Speaker 1: Defaced the Nation.
Speaker 2: Hm hmm, I don't know. I'd have to look that
Speaker 2: one up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I got it, Tim Roster. He was even though
Speaker 1: he even though he was a flaming Democrat, I mean liberal,
Speaker 1: he was fair. He actually did his job properly.
Speaker 2: Mhm. I thought you were gonna have for him. I
Speaker 2: thought you were gonna go I'm sorry, I thought you
Speaker 2: were gonna go Chet Huntley or or possibly Charlie Rose.
Speaker 2: But okay, Russer.
Speaker 3: Gotcha Charlie Rose.
Speaker 2: For a while there, he was thought of as a
Speaker 2: great influencer, right, I mean Howard Stern, though not respected,
Speaker 2: was definitely a big influencer and broadcast at a certain point. Uh,
Speaker 2: anybody that he basically endorsed for governor outside of that
Speaker 2: ridiculousness he did the one time where he was running
Speaker 2: for governor of New York. Pretty much his endorsement carried
Speaker 2: a hell of a lot of weight in the Northeast.
Speaker 2: And Howard Stern definitely not a respected broadcaster, but you
Speaker 2: had to respect the business model and the size of
Speaker 2: the audience, you know, stuff like that. But it's interesting. No,
Speaker 2: we don't have one of those respected news people out
Speaker 2: there at the moment, do it.
Speaker 3: No not.
Speaker 1: I I don't know that that's gonna be a thing.
Speaker 2: David Brinkley was another guy too, Right, Brinkley.
Speaker 3: I think.
Speaker 1: There's gonna be well, there already is unlimited choices. If
Speaker 1: people choose the only listen and learn people that believe
Speaker 1: the exact same things they do, this will be a
Speaker 1: bad thing. If people take advantage being able to sample
Speaker 1: two hundred different mm hmm opinions of something that just
Speaker 1: happened a news story, I think that could that could
Speaker 1: be a very good thing.
Speaker 2: Well, when it comes to the podcast world, Jimmy right,
Speaker 2: you have a huge amount of choices here, whether you
Speaker 2: want to follow true crime or you want to follow
Speaker 2: things like like there's a couple of podcasts out there
Speaker 2: that literally follow the comings and goings in the underworld
Speaker 2: of organized crime, like you know, as it's happening, you
Speaker 2: know who's the new head of the newest indicate in
Speaker 2: the newest city whatever. You also have people that investigate
Speaker 2: old cases that have gone cold or were important in
Speaker 2: the media at one point. Or another. You have dedicated
Speaker 2: podcasts to particular types of media, You have political podcasts
Speaker 2: of all stripes one way or another. Podcasts provide you
Speaker 2: with the most diversified group of voices available in any
Speaker 2: of one of the genres, don't they.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's.
Speaker 3: That.
Speaker 1: Damn CNN if they had more than one brand that
Speaker 1: they were passing around to share it. Now. Last year
Speaker 1: they had that new manager who tried to do things
Speaker 1: to move the network to a more centrist, non biased position,
Speaker 1: to return, as he put it, to return to being
Speaker 1: a straight news network. Remember that, and his own employees
Speaker 1: revolted until he was forced to leave. Well, that was
Speaker 1: their own destruction. You know, as little of an audience
Speaker 1: as they have, it's just going to keep going down. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: other liberal outlets which believe is more or less the
Speaker 1: same things as CNN MSNBC, who are perhaps on rocoup
Speaker 1: or something, they're going to increase viewers. So I don't know.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's better to have two hundred groups than three.
Speaker 1: Considering inform, it could be a good thing, it could
Speaker 1: be a horrible thing. What's your thoughts in that?
Speaker 2: Well, it's been both so far. It's been interesting. There
Speaker 2: are entities out there that have grown in a very
Speaker 2: interesting way. Your Newsmax, you know, news Nation, right, you
Speaker 2: have the the France twenty four network expanding a lot.
Speaker 2: It's gotten into a lot of satellite you know packages
Speaker 2: out there. Stuff like that. CNN's funny because I do
Speaker 2: remember a time a long time ago where CNN seemed
Speaker 2: like a straight news network. You know. The only guy
Speaker 2: who survived since then is what Wolf Plitzer, right, Wolf Blitzer.
Speaker 2: And there's one other guy, the guy who tried to
Speaker 2: date Monica Lewinsky back in the day. That guy. Those
Speaker 2: guys still exist from that time when CNN was I
Speaker 2: don't know, actually a news network, but ever after they
Speaker 2: became something else, and they've been something else for a
Speaker 2: long time.
Speaker 3: But I.
Speaker 2: Understand your other your analysis about that new manager guy.
Speaker 1: You know, I once like disagreement with that. I would
Speaker 1: say the the people right before them was once CNN
Speaker 1: was actually good. Bernard Shaw, oh.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah great, and then after.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and then after nine eleven Wolf the game
Speaker 1: showed up, and then in my opinion room, the thing
Speaker 1: would be.
Speaker 2: Well, Wolf at first was interesting during the Iraq War,
Speaker 2: That's where you know, his prominence rises and it seemed
Speaker 2: to me like he was objected before then. But you
Speaker 2: think that's when it got ruined is when that that
Speaker 2: group showed up huh, began going down.
Speaker 4: The two maybe and then maybe, I mean that's what that's.
Speaker 1: I mean, even CNN fifteen years ago, it wasn't nearly,
Speaker 1: it wasn't a joke today said joke, I mean regularly.
Speaker 1: One of their anchors was on the Stephen Colbert Show
Speaker 1: and he was saying, why do you think it is
Speaker 1: that a straight news net like that work like yours?
Speaker 1: It's getting less respect And the whole audience began last
Speaker 1: and the ladies, who was that it? Joe Colbert said, well,
Speaker 1: I didn't mean it as well. They were laughing at
Speaker 1: the idea of CNN being objected.
Speaker 2: Yeah, CNN now has a comedy show on it, by
Speaker 2: the way, with that Roy Wood Junior who used to
Speaker 2: be on The Daily Show as a correspondent. I think
Speaker 2: it's called I've Got News for You or something, and
Speaker 2: it's just jokes about about the news. And I got
Speaker 2: to tell you it's fairly informative. So you know they're
Speaker 2: making comedies and documentaries at all all that.
Speaker 6: Uh.
Speaker 2: They also detached that headline news thing from their news
Speaker 2: U you know organization. They used to have another channel,
Speaker 2: Headline News hl AN.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that was the origin.
Speaker 1: Crime deal like the crime podcast. Yeah, with Headline News
Speaker 1: is now.
Speaker 2: But yeah, true crime documentaries twenty four hours a day.
Speaker 2: So that's where they've been. What is it, no, not
Speaker 2: Mark Wahlberg, Donnie Wahlberg right, hosting, hosting true crime shows
Speaker 2: pretty much? Uh uh, you know, like what is it called.
Speaker 2: I forget what it's called, but it's like, here's the
Speaker 2: evil serial killers that were gonna profile for the next
Speaker 2: hour with Donnie Wahlberg, right, kind of fun, but not
Speaker 2: a news station.
Speaker 3: They started that. Headline News was their program. I mean
Speaker 3: that's what they were, CNN Headline News. They had a
Speaker 3: news division and they started branching off from it and
Speaker 3: producing other content, and from there you had CNN International,
Speaker 3: you had CNN Business, but CNN Headlined News that was
Speaker 3: that was the open ar Jaw and Bobby Bautista and
Speaker 3: but you know, you think about it when when Wolf
Speaker 3: Blitzer came along, they basically just modeled that after Ted
Speaker 3: Copple on ABC when he was doing the hostage situation.
Speaker 3: That's what started Nightline.
Speaker 2: Yep, fair enough.
Speaker 3: Wolf just kind of followed that same model when they
Speaker 3: were discussed in the war.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm, yeah, that's what road Rose Copple up there.
Speaker 2: Because even the the music that I think they still
Speaker 2: use as the opener to that show at night right
Speaker 2: was like now it's day, you know whatever of the
Speaker 2: hostage crisis. Dun dun dun dun dun dunk right that.
Speaker 2: But anyway, things have devolved over the years, and CNN
Speaker 2: is now not the network it once was. I agree
Speaker 2: with you there entirely, Jimmy. Maybe a slightly different time
Speaker 2: period where stuff started to go wrong, but still it's approximation.
Speaker 2: It's close. Anyways, anybody else.
Speaker 3: Wants that average life, Chuck, and I don't know if
Speaker 3: you know this trivia or not, but do you know
Speaker 3: what the average life of it, like a news program
Speaker 3: is nowadays? I mean, because you know, for years you
Speaker 3: had the Big Three on TV well radio before that,
Speaker 3: but then you know, UPI has gone away. I'm just
Speaker 3: wondering these news like Newsmax and News Nation, these new channels,
Speaker 3: what kind of lifetime were what thirty years with Fox
Speaker 3: News Now, I didn't realize they had been that long. Yeah,
Speaker 3: but they've been around for thirty years, So do these
Speaker 3: things start falling apart at fifty? I mean, is that
Speaker 3: why CBS and NBC are starting to go down the tubes?
Speaker 3: They just they burned our sales out.
Speaker 1: I think it's because the kind of vision as a
Speaker 1: media is going down the tubes, and it's been more
Speaker 1: people don't watch till.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's been sixty years since you know, the news
Speaker 2: went live with the Kennedy assassination, right, So I wouldn't
Speaker 2: say that. And also you got to consider that CBS, ABC,
Speaker 2: NBC they also had radio news before the TV took off, right,
Speaker 2: So you know, I don't know how to count that
Speaker 2: when when a news program exists for a certain amount
Speaker 2: of time, some of them have come and gone real fast.
Speaker 2: Some of them were built around personalities that didn't pan out,
Speaker 2: and some of them existed a long time. I mean,
Speaker 2: think about how long Bill O'Reilly. You haven't heard from
Speaker 2: him in a while. By the way, Bill.
Speaker 3: O'Reilly, Unfortunately he shows up on a lot of other
Speaker 3: people's shows.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well mostly I think I catch him with Chris
Speaker 2: Cuomo every now and then. I think he's got a
Speaker 2: regular spot there on News Nation.
Speaker 3: But well, he's raging on Beck and Hannity, and I
Speaker 3: mean several of them play and Buck so yeah, you
Speaker 3: know he's and he's got his own news website.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 3: It's funny though, you know, we're starting to see new
Speaker 3: broadcasts entities like news Well newsbacks has been around them
Speaker 3: longer than News Nation, but there's this what another one?
Speaker 3: Uh Oi n News and then there's what American News Network.
Speaker 3: We've seen these things come out in these past few years. Yep,
Speaker 3: with the with the diversity. Now streaming cable is getting
Speaker 3: ready to go away because everybody's got a Hulu or
Speaker 3: a firestick or something. It's I think we're going to
Speaker 3: see a heavy influence on internet news coming up. You
Speaker 3: really don't need, you know, a huge studio to do
Speaker 3: internet news and do it from your den. Yeah, so
Speaker 3: I think that's going to be the big thing.
Speaker 2: Well, there's a ton of those on YouTube. You might
Speaker 2: not be aware of it, but there's a ton of
Speaker 2: like news stations pretty much all across YouTube. You can
Speaker 2: find them.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I've got a lot of them. Yeah, and
Speaker 3: they're all clickbait. You know, to some headline, you got
Speaker 3: to listen to it in ten minutes in it's all
Speaker 3: so and so said such and such made that might happen.
Speaker 3: It's hard to wead through them. There's so many of.
Speaker 2: Them on YouTube, right, But there's a couple of good
Speaker 2: ones that you know when something happens locally to whatever
Speaker 2: place they're in. Like, you know, for quite a while,
Speaker 2: missus Oh found herself watching one in Florida a lot.
Speaker 2: And it's a new station in Florida pretty much, you know,
Speaker 2: which has a small broadcast element to it, but the
Speaker 2: majority of its viewers are actually on YouTube, which is
Speaker 2: a different phenomena. Right, So you know, there you go,
Speaker 2: you plug into that, and I have no idea what
Speaker 2: their ad revenue is or anything else, but there's plenty
Speaker 2: of places you can go now at this point that
Speaker 2: don't involve a broadcast TV.
Speaker 3: You know, there's the thing that compares Tucker Carlson's views
Speaker 3: to say Rogans.
Speaker 2: Well, somebody asked me about you know, what is Tucker
Speaker 2: saying in the chat room, and I was just about
Speaker 2: to say, the last thing I heard from Tucker Carlson
Speaker 2: recently was pretty much a desperate plea make sure you
Speaker 2: go out and vote for Trump on the election day
Speaker 2: and just before it. Outside of that, I don't know
Speaker 2: what Tucker's had to say post election.
Speaker 3: I haven't really I don't know how to take him.
Speaker 3: You know, I've never really known how to take him.
Speaker 3: I was never been a fan, and when he left
Speaker 3: the network and went off on his own, I thought, okay, fine,
Speaker 3: But I don't know. He's just he's caught a little
Speaker 3: squirrely in some directions from what I would think he would.
Speaker 3: But I don't follow him. I'm just wondering how well
Speaker 3: he's doing it to meet network and go out on
Speaker 3: your own. I wish him luck, and I hope he
Speaker 3: can do it. I mean, that's an incentive for other
Speaker 3: people to say, hey, get out and do it. I
Speaker 3: can do it. I can do it too. But I
Speaker 3: just I'm just curious to know what his viewership is like,
Speaker 3: if it's considered good or mediocre or what.
Speaker 2: Well, just like many other people that stream are doing
Speaker 2: many other people.
Speaker 1: That do it, Jimmy, it's just under Rogan, Tucker's just under.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 1: Saved Steel also loved to ESPN, and she's got a
Speaker 1: top gime podcast. So there's someone else. It just wasn't
Speaker 1: the only Maggie Kelly. Of course, I don't know the
Speaker 1: dinosaur corporate news media structures, just it's.
Speaker 4: There.
Speaker 3: You wonder how much, how much give me? How much
Speaker 3: do you think of that could be attributed to them
Speaker 3: being bought out like entities like Disney and Paramount and
Speaker 3: you know these big companies. You think that had an
Speaker 3: effect on them, and that's maybe why they're probably.
Speaker 1: Oh absolutely, their first their first big mistake was this
Speaker 1: is what the news was and what it should be.
Speaker 1: He gets fifteen minutes the local news and fifteen minutes
Speaker 1: of national news and there's no commercials. And the channels
Speaker 1: played these things because it's their civic duty and they're
Speaker 1: required to.
Speaker 2: Oh back in the days when news was a public
Speaker 2: service as opposed to a business.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's the need to guarantee.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Chet, well, Chet I like Roger Mutt, He's the
Speaker 1: one that Walter Kronkite wanted to take over, but instead
Speaker 1: they gave it to Dan rabbed them out.
Speaker 3: I'll never understand that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe between Eric Sebaride and and that guy, I mean,
Speaker 2: you would have thought they had better people to hand
Speaker 2: it over to, but rather rose the prominence. Guess how
Speaker 2: he was there man in Dallas on November twenty second,
Speaker 2: nineteen sixty three. Okay, there's his rise to prominence, springboarded
Speaker 2: right off of the Kennedy assassinations.
Speaker 1: I see dance, Uh, Sam Donaldson's bulkan had going all
Speaker 1: over the place, and that damn police station where Ruby
Speaker 1: popped as well.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm. Well, anyway, Jimmy, I'm gonna put you on yep,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna put you on hold, Jimmy and get to
Speaker 2: another caller. But you know, hang on, maybe we'll get
Speaker 2: back around to you. We got some time left. Uh,
Speaker 2: and let's see eight six ' five area code, looks
Speaker 2: like you're live. What's on your mind tonight?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I meet Jimmy.
Speaker 4: I mean, don't don't gagg him, don't santry. I may
Speaker 4: here's time the top. Now I'm in the chosen one.
Speaker 3: To going back to the throne exactly.
Speaker 2: I'm not gagging him.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we made Wait wait, we may get Sue. We
Speaker 4: may get some predictions down here.
Speaker 2: Well, see, that's the thing. I asked for a prediction,
Speaker 2: but I didn't ask for it the right way. What's
Speaker 2: a good prediction you want to get, Harland, let me know.
Speaker 2: We'll pass it around.
Speaker 4: Well, I want I want to know a few different things. Okay,
Speaker 4: First of all, Jason Barker over at Nights of the
Speaker 4: Storm the Fox, So he asked me to come on
Speaker 4: in the morning if I don't over sleep, on me
Speaker 4: on at ten o'clock Eastern time. Okay, But he's been
Speaker 4: done some studying. Unlike we've discussed before, we're about far
Speaker 4: as you know, the quote election croud in twenty twenty.
Speaker 4: How that I've said that, I was always kind of
Speaker 4: hard to believe that they was almost one hundred and
Speaker 4: sixty million people were one hundred and sixty some hundred
Speaker 4: and fifty eight. I've seen various different numbers. Now all
Speaker 4: of a sudden, other people are starting to know to
Speaker 4: set and I've dug up a few things, and Jason
Speaker 4: asked too, we're going to have a discussion on that.
Speaker 4: How just the overall I've talked about it, I mean,
Speaker 4: it was as a broke record, you know, for a while,
Speaker 4: Boudy that that's the part that didn't look right to
Speaker 4: make that the percentages, you know, I could believe them that,
Speaker 4: you know, people was just wore out for different reasons
Speaker 4: with Trump and Biden, you know, was supposed to have
Speaker 4: been the news savior or whatever. But the overall vote
Speaker 4: total and hit being record numbers and stuff like it,
Speaker 4: and never did smell right. But I was just wondering
Speaker 4: if anybody's gonna make a prediction on what promises was
Speaker 4: gonna be kept and what promises was never gonna be
Speaker 4: heard of anymore from the Republicans and Trump. You know, man,
Speaker 4: A friend of mine was having a discussion earlier, and
Speaker 4: I forgot about the show, and I looked at them,
Speaker 4: see what time it was. I gotta get off from here.
Speaker 4: But we was discussing the pardons for the J six people.
Speaker 8: That was a big deal.
Speaker 4: A year ago. But now, yeah, I've not seen and
Speaker 4: heard as much about it, even though one of the
Speaker 4: local podcasters here had a guy home this week. But
Speaker 4: I've not been seeing much about that.
Speaker 1: I think it'll have to think.
Speaker 4: They argue, do you think it'll be a blanket one?
Speaker 4: Do you think it'll be like a friend? I mean,
Speaker 4: I think it would. It would probably make them look better.
Speaker 3: I think I think that it doesn't have it's.
Speaker 2: Not Well, b Pete's got an answer for you. I
Speaker 2: guess on the Jay sixth thing, go ahead, be Pete.
Speaker 3: I think it'll be a blanket for anybody that has
Speaker 3: any non violent charges. If anybody has any charges like
Speaker 3: assault on a copp or something like that, it'll get
Speaker 3: looked at. They may get a reduced I don't think
Speaker 3: they'll get a full pardon. But I think the for
Speaker 3: the majority of people there that is just trespassing charges
Speaker 3: of that. Yeah, I think he's going to issue a
Speaker 3: blanket when on.
Speaker 2: That m and when when do you think you'll do that?
Speaker 3: Well, let's see, I would say it would probably be
Speaker 3: by the end of January, the gate of February.
Speaker 2: Okay, so within the first few weeks of him being
Speaker 2: in office, he's going to take care of that. And
Speaker 2: you figure a blanket for non violent and reductions something
Speaker 2: going on for even the ones that might have some
Speaker 2: violence in there.
Speaker 3: They got charged with hitting the cop. And I mean
Speaker 3: they've got video evidence of the guy hitting the cop. Yeah,
Speaker 3: he may have to pull some time. You might get
Speaker 3: something computed, but I don't think you may get.
Speaker 2: So you don't think they'll turn around and say, okay,
Speaker 2: I have no part and but time served can commutation
Speaker 2: maybe yeah, okay, go ahead, yeah, thank you.
Speaker 4: Toward do you know what for the for the paper,
Speaker 4: there's a crowding up the front of the capital with
Speaker 4: the zip TI handcuffs and stuff like that. I mean,
Speaker 4: I'm not saying they deserve twenty years or nothing, but
Speaker 4: I don't think that, you know, they're gonna get as
Speaker 4: much empty, you know, as do some modch walk through there.
Speaker 4: You know what I'm saying. I liked the guy that
Speaker 4: was holding the podium lecture and whatever you want to
Speaker 4: call it. Some because of the electures, because of the podium,
Speaker 4: you know what. People like that. It's not one hundred
Speaker 4: and fifty or sixty thousand dollars on waters. You know,
Speaker 4: they might you know, qualify for something.
Speaker 2: But now should run?
Speaker 3: Should I run twenty?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Should I run? This by Jimmy James? You think?
Speaker 1: Huh yeah?
Speaker 4: One more thing too before I forget about it. I
Speaker 4: just shared this and I didn't read it. I just
Speaker 4: looked at the headline. I shared it on Twitter, so
Speaker 4: you should be able to find it. Choke and read
Speaker 4: it from David Knight had shared something just here recently
Speaker 4: saying there's a screene. I believe it was. It might
Speaker 4: have been a story saying that the Trump campaign was
Speaker 4: starting to distance theirself from RFK Jr. Because of some
Speaker 4: comment about vaccine safety. MM that was right before ARCHUSI
Speaker 4: it popped up on my fault.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, my prediction is that he's going to
Speaker 2: find a way to dump him anyhow, So that's what's
Speaker 2: going to happen there. In my opinion, he was used
Speaker 2: for what he was used for, and he served his
Speaker 2: purpose and a story. That's that's where I come down
Speaker 2: out it. But maybe I'm wrong.
Speaker 4: Yeah, good, I'm open and I welcome any good before
Speaker 4: you turn Jimmy lookes, I'm open and welcome to any
Speaker 4: good thing that Republicans and Trump can or will accomplish.
Speaker 4: A lot of the stuff is just getting them to
Speaker 4: It's not as much as you know, the Democrats is
Speaker 4: stopping them. It's lacking a lot of these red steak utopias.
Speaker 4: You know, you don't have a Democrat problem, you have
Speaker 4: a Republican problem. It seems like that nothing never gets done,
Speaker 4: or it's always this or it's that, or Democrat lie
Speaker 4: and blah blah blah, so forth, so off. But I
Speaker 4: would like to know what Jimmy thinks and what kind
Speaker 4: of promises that he thinks that will be kept, because
Speaker 4: I'm sure he knows a lot more than what I do.
Speaker 4: Because to be honest if you folks, I've not been
Speaker 4: paying that much attention to all of this stuff because
Speaker 4: you know, is a disappointed customer in twenty sixteen, and
Speaker 4: you know, I all will promises start going out the
Speaker 4: window in a week of the election.
Speaker 2: Okay, So you want Jimmy to answer what promises he
Speaker 2: thinks will be kept and will not be kept? You
Speaker 2: want to know specifically about the Jay sixth thing and
Speaker 2: what else?
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, I want anything anything else that that any
Speaker 4: kind of promises, big promises that he's heard of that
Speaker 4: he thinks that it will be kept, you know, within
Speaker 4: the first you know, three to six months. And I'm
Speaker 4: talking about stuff to be clear that you've got Republican
Speaker 4: control of all three branches of government again, just like
Speaker 4: it'd be a little less than what it was in
Speaker 4: twenty seventeen when he took office. But what he thinks,
Speaker 4: hell that they can do that they will.
Speaker 1: But I'm not talking.
Speaker 4: About stuff that they need sixty votes and blah blah blah,
Speaker 4: but stuff that they can actually push through easy pickens
Speaker 4: and get it done and move on.
Speaker 2: Okay, I'll put hopefully Jimmy's been listening, I'll put you
Speaker 2: on hold Harlan and put Jimmy on and hopefully Jimmy
Speaker 2: you heard the question, Yeah, hed, cool, okay, all you.
Speaker 1: What big things? Well the big the big things that
Speaker 1: I see Trump doing over what the first six months?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Uh, he will negotiate an end to the war in
Speaker 1: the Ukraine.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: He will be pardoning many people involved, well who were Yeah,
Speaker 1: I guess people who are sure January, the big January
Speaker 1: sixth deal. Uh. Yeah, I could see him definitely doing
Speaker 1: something with that. Maybe, But honestly, I can foresee Biden
Speaker 1: PI pardoning his son, himself, his family and the January
Speaker 1: sixth people and say that he hopes that we could
Speaker 1: just move on working together and forget the pass and
Speaker 1: don't look into my crazy shit.
Speaker 6: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: Let's see next big thing. Yeah, Iran's going to lose
Speaker 1: their nuclear capabilities, They're going to be once again isolated
Speaker 1: and they're going to be destroyed. Well that's not six months,
Speaker 1: but Israel's going to be turned loose to finally, and
Speaker 1: these this war against them from Iran Hasbilla hamas the PLO.
Speaker 1: They were all involved. We all know this now from
Speaker 1: the documents found in the tunnels, and this serious.
Speaker 2: And this will be serious military action taken against Iran.
Speaker 2: This will be serious military action taken against Iran within
Speaker 2: the first six months or so, you think.
Speaker 1: Not by us, But yeah, Israel's gonna do it. They
Speaker 1: would have done it. Biden is preventing them doing it. Okay,
Speaker 1: So Israel's gonna be free too when they're there war
Speaker 1: and the way they see fit m that would be
Speaker 1: a big of course, the minute that Trump announces his
Speaker 1: energy policies, an announcis that he's going to the pipeline
Speaker 1: and other things. Fuel prices will drop by about a
Speaker 1: dollar with them, But then about that six months probably quickly, yeah,
Speaker 1: three four months, maybe even a couple of weeks.
Speaker 2: Okay, so what we else?
Speaker 1: I'll see big coming along. It seems like there's long.
Speaker 2: Well it's a few so there'll be more stuff than.
Speaker 1: You want to know what I think he won't be
Speaker 1: able to do that people want him to do, want
Speaker 1: me to try that route.
Speaker 2: Well, I think he was looking for the promises he
Speaker 2: was going to keep, not necessarily the ones he's not
Speaker 2: going to keep, but stuff that he promised to do. Hey,
Speaker 2: what do you think about the JFK stuff? Do you
Speaker 2: think he's going to actually get that.
Speaker 1: Out absolutely, and I need to immediately release a paper
Speaker 1: beforehand so I could prove that I deduce these things
Speaker 1: before the damn documents were released.
Speaker 2: Good idea, But I disagree with you about the JFK release.
Speaker 2: I think it'll be again not done in full. But okay,
Speaker 2: go ahead.
Speaker 1: You know, I think RFK will be taking a big
Speaker 1: part in that. Actually, that's something I can't see him be.
Speaker 2: M what if he gets kicked to the curtain ball
Speaker 2: if gets kicked to the curve by the Trump administration.
Speaker 13: Uh, I don't see why he would be Uh.
Speaker 1: They have prick watched the same use that medical procedures
Speaker 1: should not be forced to pound unwilling Americans things such Uh.
Speaker 1: I don't know how powerful even most brain his character
Speaker 1: is going to be now the one normal whatever can't
Speaker 1: potential member of his cabinet Orse Nick Cling's possibly a
Speaker 1: name for Toorney General. I don't know when heard of
Speaker 1: the guy, but he inqusted me today after Lectasa Jean
Speaker 1: came out and threatened the president, made it clear that
Speaker 1: she will never stop quote unquote fighting him. He came
Speaker 1: out very clear that she acts on anything that she
Speaker 1: just said. He's going to immediately and d her the
Speaker 1: criminal conspiracy and throw her badass into the prison. That's
Speaker 1: his words come out.
Speaker 2: All right, Well, look we got about sex. Yeah, we
Speaker 2: got about six minutes left. Okay, sorry, we got about
Speaker 2: six minutes left. So what I want to do here
Speaker 2: is give be Pete a chance to say whatever he wants.
Speaker 2: And you answered Harlan's question. I don't know if be
Speaker 2: Pete wants to answer that too, but we got those
Speaker 2: minutes left. Be Pete, so tell me what we're gonna
Speaker 2: do with him.
Speaker 3: Oh, I don't know. I guess we have to schedule
Speaker 3: something as a rehash before we go to the conference,
Speaker 3: since that is coming up. What two weeks you said, yep,
Speaker 3: I'll be to make Fini and then you'll be going
Speaker 3: the second Friday, yep. Okay, Well, I don't know. We
Speaker 3: just we have to wait and see what happens. Here's
Speaker 3: gonna be a slow roll. We got to make it
Speaker 3: to January before Trump eveets sits us. But you know,
Speaker 3: in the chair and tries to get Biden this little
Speaker 3: ask groove out of it. I may just buy a
Speaker 3: hold new chair. Who knows, I've thought about it, though,
Speaker 3: I'm wondering when the Democrats are gonna suddenly full the
Speaker 3: twenty fifth Amendment on Biden and put Harris in so
Speaker 3: they can claim the first female president. Of course, he'd
Speaker 3: only be in there for what sixty seven days, but
Speaker 3: it could happen. There's something of somebody's sleeve. We just
Speaker 3: haven't seen it yet. I guess the shock is still
Speaker 3: taking effect, so it'll be interesting to see what happens
Speaker 3: between now and January. Other than that, I just say
Speaker 3: thanks for another week, and thanks for Harlan and Jimmy
Speaker 3: James calling in and glad to hear Jimmy James. I
Speaker 3: wish he'd have been here election night.
Speaker 14: We could have had his expertise, but oh well, we
Speaker 14: muttered through and I did get to see Rachel Maddow
Speaker 14: almost cry so that I did not win the.
Speaker 3: District number six Soil and Water Conservation Commission job.
Speaker 2: Oh you didn't who want it? Yeah?
Speaker 3: It wasn't me?
Speaker 2: Okay, Well with that, with that, I figure I should
Speaker 2: turn these guys loose, you know, for the last couple
Speaker 2: of minutes, see what else they want to say, and
Speaker 2: unfortun I guess I won't be able to take any
Speaker 2: more calls. But I do have next week that will
Speaker 2: be with the open lines again before I go to Dallas.
Speaker 2: So Harlan, I definitely turned you loose, and Jimmy, I'll
Speaker 2: turn loose next. But there you go. What do you
Speaker 2: think of your answers?
Speaker 4: You know, you know, I'd just like to see some
Speaker 4: you know, some action, you know, something tangible, you know,
Speaker 4: And I'm I think I'm not the only one. And
Speaker 4: I heard a few couple other noteworthy things that I
Speaker 4: can't prove. I didn't look up a story that said
Speaker 4: Trump said that a pardon for Hunter Biden was now
Speaker 4: the question. Somebody told me that is basically a big
Speaker 4: Trump supporters and he was disappointed. Said that he heard
Speaker 4: Don Junior claim that he was going to pardon Hunter Biden.
Speaker 4: But I've not been able to find that, which I've
Speaker 4: been done a lot of stuff around the house. I've
Speaker 4: not you know, looked a lot. But to just go
Speaker 4: ahead and turn Jimmy loose. And sorry I was late,
Speaker 4: but I'll catch you guys next week.
Speaker 2: Mikey definitely, definitely, I have not heard about this Hunter
Speaker 2: Biden pardon thing. But then again, you know, it sounds
Speaker 2: to me like the kind of rumored crap that you
Speaker 2: know sometimes has no basis in reality.
Speaker 3: But yeah, in one of Trump's interviews, he did say
Speaker 3: it wasn't out of the questions.
Speaker 2: Oh, he said it wasn't out of the question. Okay, Well, anyways, Jimmy,
Speaker 2: you're live also now. So we got just these tule minutes, a.
Speaker 4: Lot of fight videos, remember that, folks. There's a lot
Speaker 4: of fake AI videos that's there. There's getting better and better.
Speaker 2: That too, that too, Harlan, You're right about that. So anyway,
Speaker 2: we're we're loosing live with both of you. I guess
Speaker 2: you're on the line with just about two minutes left,
Speaker 2: and like I said, the age of transitions with Aaron
Speaker 2: Fronz will begin after that. So Jimmy, uh, you know,
Speaker 2: real fast, have you heard anything about this hunter Biden pardon?
Speaker 1: I heard a lot of people that don't know anything
Speaker 1: discussing it. I mean, who knows. I think Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and Trump would probably negotiate, And I'll pardon you if
Speaker 1: you pardon me.
Speaker 2: M Well, there'd be nothing to stop Joe Biden from
Speaker 2: pardoning his son on the way out the door. Huh.
Speaker 1: Well, he swore to God that he will not do that. No, yeah,
Speaker 1: but so that would look bad.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Now look, if Trump propus us to do it, he
Speaker 1: will do it. I have no doubts of that, and
Speaker 1: his whole family and himself. But it would look better
Speaker 1: and it would be better for the country. I think
Speaker 1: if Trump did say, look, he's pardoning them or puntry
Speaker 1: in this case, for the crimes he's already been convicted of,
Speaker 1: which is nothing. There's much everything hidden will be exposed.
Speaker 2: So there we go. We got sunshine to look forward
Speaker 2: to on a whole lot of things. I mean, the
Speaker 2: optimism from the pro Trump side is that we're gonna
Speaker 2: see the JFK files released. We're going to see a
Speaker 2: lot of sunshine on a lot of things that have
Speaker 2: been hidden up to this point. And I don't know,
Speaker 2: you know what, I don't have a lot of faith
Speaker 2: in that, just because it is, after all, the US
Speaker 2: government got nothing to do with Trump even. I think
Speaker 2: it's just one of those things that we usually don't
Speaker 2: get transparency, and there you go, it's got nothing to
Speaker 2: do with Trump even. But you know, then again, I
Speaker 2: point to twenty seventeen once more, where he could have
Speaker 2: done nothing and a whole lot more stuff would have
Speaker 2: tumbled out into the JFK Records collection. But you know
Speaker 2: that's just my complaint, right Anyways, almost done here and
Speaker 2: only a few seconds left, so I guess i'll take
Speaker 2: them to say this, The Age of transitions is coming up. Now.
Speaker 2: I am merely Ocelly and guess what all of you
Speaker 2: are the effect, and I'll look forward to seeing you
Speaker 2: next week, maybe a couple of solo shows, maybe a
Speaker 2: surprise interviewer too, before I go off to Dallas. Guess
Speaker 2: you'll app to stay tuned and find out on Olly
Speaker 2: dot com radio. Be well,