Speaker 1: Something's going to happen.
Speaker 2: Esome, What's going to happen?
Speaker 1: Quiet? Welcome to the Occult Rejects today. We are talking
Speaker 1: the trivium and quadrivium with some people who have been
Speaker 1: researching this topic for a long time. I want to
Speaker 1: go around and have people introduce themselves. Let's start with you, Lisa,
Speaker 1: and then we'll go over to you, Nick and Tim
Speaker 1: and then Daniel.
Speaker 3: Right, Lisa, thank you and glad to be here. Very
Speaker 3: excited to hear about chick. I've been talking about it
Speaker 3: for a while. And you can check out the Occult
Speaker 3: Research institutechat org. Some of our rejects contribute to our
Speaker 3: website in a literary form, so checks out the Cult
Speaker 3: Research Institute dot org.
Speaker 1: Thank you, it's a great website. Go ahead, Dick.
Speaker 4: Hell yeah, thank you very much, sir, and I appreciate
Speaker 4: you making this happen today, bringing Dayne on the show.
Speaker 2: That is what's up?
Speaker 4: Uh yeah, the Occult Rejects. I mean, I'm sure you
Speaker 4: guys already know. Uh yeah, we got a bitch you
Speaker 4: rumble YouTube and all major podcasts, and I'm gonna beat
Speaker 4: headless to it. On Thursdays, we read mail bags mail
Speaker 4: sent in from you know on Headless's show by the Fans,
Speaker 4: if you got any weird, paranormal, occult, anything fucking strange story,
Speaker 4: send it in and we will talk about it when
Speaker 4: we cover a symbol too for each week. So it's
Speaker 4: my opinion, it's a it's an easy show to listen
Speaker 4: to that actually has useful information in it, and then
Speaker 4: you get a few weird stories at the end and
Speaker 4: it's a short so check it out.
Speaker 1: Thank you absolutely. This week, I'm trying to focus on
Speaker 1: weird mall dreams.
Speaker 2: Before had weird mall dreams actually, yep.
Speaker 1: So send me those emails and we'll talk about your
Speaker 1: weird mall dreams. Go ahead, Tim, and then we'll get
Speaker 1: to you.
Speaker 5: I'm Tim. My podcast is sixth censory podcast. I do
Speaker 5: spell it out six. I don't use the number six.
Speaker 5: I'm on mainly I'm on Spotify, YouTube and Patreon and Instagram.
Speaker 5: I'm happy to be here, Dwayne. I think I'm gonna
Speaker 5: go out on a limb here. But I think that
Speaker 5: i've heard you on maybe the Deep Share podcast. Does
Speaker 5: that sound correct? Yep, that's great and it was epic.
Speaker 5: I've heard you on there a couple of times. One
Speaker 5: was like Huxley and m k ltra and that that
Speaker 5: whole sort of Columbia sye op and the other was
Speaker 5: like farming. They were both great. So I'm happy to
Speaker 5: be here man, happy to hear what you got to say.
Speaker 2: Cool.
Speaker 6: Yeah, that Rise of the Expert series is really where
Speaker 6: we uncovered all of this. It was a ten part series.
Speaker 6: We did that on the Deep Share with Andy Ross,
Speaker 6: and Andy Ross is a real close personal friend of
Speaker 6: mine and he sees the idea in the myth of
Speaker 6: progress the same way as we do. But first I
Speaker 6: just wanted to say that I use a pseudonym as well,
Speaker 6: like a pen name, Diego Ger. So yeah, and you
Speaker 6: can find me at the History of Propaganda on YouTube.
Speaker 6: We just had our Bulletproof pub dot com site shut
Speaker 6: down for reasons I'm not going to I mean, if
Speaker 6: you follow me on Facebook, you know why. Reconcilable differences
Speaker 6: between myself and the web designer. So you know, I'll
Speaker 6: take fifty percent the issues there and hopefully we can
Speaker 6: have something up and running again because it was a
Speaker 6: great source for the Rise of the Expert series and
Speaker 6: so really we get into the myth of human progress.
Speaker 6: That's really where this investigation into the new world order
Speaker 6: and everything that sort of happened over the last one
Speaker 6: hundred years has led us to the Enlightenment thinkers and
Speaker 6: all of this. So that's what we're going to get into.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, thank you very much. So in my experience, it
Speaker 1: seems like the trivium and the quadrivium are like dials
Speaker 1: that the expert class can turn off or turn down
Speaker 1: based off of what they want the population to be
Speaker 1: doing in society. And it's been that way for a
Speaker 1: long long time, and you can see that with the
Speaker 1: experts who teach the trivium. So let's get into it.
Speaker 1: What Dwaye, how would you describe the trivium and how
Speaker 1: it is essential for learning?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 6: Well, I call the trivium the fulcrum upon which all
Speaker 6: of human history is played, because the liberal arts are
Speaker 6: hugely important to all of this. When we look at
Speaker 6: the establishment of the scientific expert in society, the scientific
Speaker 6: governance of society one of the main tenets of progressivism.
Speaker 6: In this myth of human progress, we see that the
Speaker 6: American Association for the Association of American Universities is integral.
Speaker 6: So Harvard sixteen thirty six, William and Mary College sixteen
Speaker 6: ninety three, Yale, seventeen oh one. I think these are
Speaker 6: all well before America's even established. So America is established
Speaker 6: on this idea of military preparedness, efficiency of government, and
Speaker 6: trust the science. And so the trivium is what they did.
Speaker 6: There was because a lot of people would learn the
Speaker 6: trivium grammar, logic, and rhetoric early in their lives, and
Speaker 6: that would help them, first of all, not be lied to,
Speaker 6: because they would understand logical fallacies, they would be able
Speaker 6: to identify the moment they're being lied to. But also
Speaker 6: the trivium allows us to chain reasoning together, to put
Speaker 6: two and two together, to start seeing what they're doing
Speaker 6: behind the scenes. So they took that knowledge from sort
Speaker 6: of ordinary upbringings and put it at the highest effulons
Speaker 6: of prestigious university systems. And prestige actually means to trick
Speaker 6: or fool. So they established this whole thing, and this
Speaker 6: is really the manifest destiny across the West and the
Speaker 6: subjugation of the Native American Indian and everything was really
Speaker 6: based on this idea of establishing a university system across
Speaker 6: America to then corral everybody within this framework and keep
Speaker 6: the trivium out of their minds. So as soon as
Speaker 6: you start to learn how to properly write through grammar,
Speaker 6: you understand the importance of definitions of terms. So if
Speaker 6: you can define the terms, you own the culture, and
Speaker 6: so you'd start to see the importance of all of
Speaker 6: these ideas in the trivium. So I would say the trivium,
Speaker 6: first of all, is the three roads that unite grammar, logic,
Speaker 6: and rhetoric. Is the way that I prefer to say it,
Speaker 6: and that's, you know, proper communication, but also asking the
Speaker 6: who why we're when of logic and then establishing your
Speaker 6: own style and being able to then communicate in a
Speaker 6: persuasive an attractive way yourself. So that's what I really
Speaker 6: feel like is the missing aspect here is that we all,
Speaker 6: if we were all to upgrade our level of thinking
Speaker 6: a little bit, we'd never be fooled again.
Speaker 4: You know something really interesting that you just said. We
Speaker 4: had a guy, Ronnie Pontiac on not too long ago,
Speaker 4: and he was talking about this stuff, and I think
Speaker 4: he was saying, I looked the guy up. I forgot
Speaker 4: this name.
Speaker 2: It was interesting.
Speaker 4: I might try to cover in the future. But there
Speaker 4: was like some do that was kind of like in
Speaker 4: the middle of all these roscrusions. That is also known
Speaker 4: for pushing the trivium and saying that when people learn,
Speaker 4: it should also even be done in the native language
Speaker 4: in their areas. It's not going to be in English.
Speaker 4: You're going to actually have it in your language so
Speaker 4: you can understand what's being said. So even find interesting
Speaker 4: how even though someone's kind of surrounded by occultists, were
Speaker 4: even saying this, it's important to learn.
Speaker 6: Yeah, well this goes back to Rosicrucianism too. Once I've
Speaker 6: showed some of my tabs, we'll get into the invisible
Speaker 6: university or the invisible school, that's what they call.
Speaker 2: That's great. I love how that worked out.
Speaker 1: One of the main things that you see in theosophy
Speaker 1: is they talk about this invisible college, right, but they
Speaker 1: don't really talk about how to get there or whatever.
Speaker 1: But they've got this mythology all around the invisible college
Speaker 1: and this is the invisible masters that are ruling the planet.
Speaker 1: But they don't really tell you about anything about that
Speaker 1: or where to find out more information. Usually it's just
Speaker 1: sort of like this is the new religion. Then you
Speaker 1: have to go by this expert standard class, and really
Speaker 1: they're just repeating and covering up the same things over
Speaker 1: and over and over again, because these are the thorns
Speaker 1: that really bring down empires.
Speaker 6: Yeah, knowledge totally.
Speaker 5: I think the siap here, I'll just use that term,
Speaker 5: goes a lot deeper than what everybody thinks normans or
Speaker 5: people who kind of came up in the poet school
Speaker 5: system like most so is this is not you know this.
Speaker 5: It takes you. You have to kind of have a
Speaker 5: new set of eyes to see some of this. But
Speaker 5: I like how you're you kind of mentioned the association
Speaker 5: of the American universities with the Manifest Destiny because I've
Speaker 5: seen that collective team up in my research too, with
Speaker 5: with John Wesley Powell, and I won't go too far
Speaker 5: down that rabbit hole right now, but he was a
Speaker 5: part of the Cosmos Club and so and he was
Speaker 5: kind of a part of like shifting our destiny as
Speaker 5: a country. But I went through and I got a
Speaker 5: list of all these people who were in that Cosmos
Speaker 5: Club with Pow and it was your Yale, Harvard, Columbia, etc.
Speaker 5: People and they really really shifted direction of this country
Speaker 5: in a way that I don't think most people would
Speaker 5: be Okay.
Speaker 1: With Smithsonian too. They were the founders of the Smithsonian,
Speaker 1: so they were directly involved in the cover up of
Speaker 1: all the ancient history in America. And that's very important
Speaker 1: to know because if you don't have those pieces, how
Speaker 1: can you make a good logical subbation of what's been
Speaker 1: going on here for thousands of years?
Speaker 6: Yep, we get into the founders of the Royal Society,
Speaker 6: which would be another one of those is probably one
Speaker 6: of the first of Western society. Just to corral the
Speaker 6: human mind to make it anglicized or liberal, really is
Speaker 6: where they were trying to push everybody. And the founders
Speaker 6: of liberalism, John Stuart Mills said that he wanted everybody
Speaker 6: to be progressive. You can look at on Liberty and
Speaker 6: he talks about how he wanted one party of order
Speaker 6: and one or party of progress, and he was just
Speaker 6: going to pit them together under hostile banners, and out
Speaker 6: of that chaos they were going to create the direction
Speaker 6: that they wanted. And today we see that just perfectly
Speaker 6: displayed with everything that's going on in la and all
Speaker 6: his Trump journalism. Trump menashes it mentions manifest destiny in
Speaker 6: his inauguration speech and so then a couple of weeks later,
Speaker 6: he Elon Musk's kid picks his nose and wipes it
Speaker 6: on the Resolute desk. That desk has been in the
Speaker 6: Oval Office for since forever. Every president since has shown
Speaker 6: through the Resolute desk being in the Oval Office as
Speaker 6: a healthy relationship between the British and the Americans. Well,
Speaker 6: Musk's kid x just picked his nose, wiped it on it,
Speaker 6: and the next day Trump removed it for refinishing and
Speaker 6: it hasn't come back. So there there's a there's a
Speaker 6: move away from at least the Royalty and the Queen
Speaker 6: that I see from that act and still started playing
Speaker 6: out here in real time as as the relationships between Canada, British,
Speaker 6: the British and the Americans have reached a really interesting
Speaker 6: head here as to which direction we're going to go
Speaker 6: right and the Britis so integral in establishing the academic
Speaker 6: institutions all across the country, especially with Harvard, Yale and
Speaker 6: all the rest of these, those were British institutions, and
Speaker 6: I think the idea behind letting the British have control
Speaker 6: over these institutions came from.
Speaker 1: Maybe not as obvious agreement, but it came out of
Speaker 1: the War of eighteen twelve. So we're told that we
Speaker 1: won the War of eighteen twelve, but they burned the British,
Speaker 1: burned all of Washington, d C. So how could you
Speaker 1: really call that a victory. At some point they had
Speaker 1: to say, we need to end this because our constant
Speaker 1: fuck ups are using all the resources of the country,
Speaker 1: and now we need to sort of settle. And so
Speaker 1: I think part of that settlement was letting the British
Speaker 1: institution of academia take over all of the the minds
Speaker 1: of this.
Speaker 6: Country then, and the plan was to take that trivia
Speaker 6: method and to do exactly what I said, to put
Speaker 6: it at the finish line at the highest echalons of
Speaker 6: university education and knowledge, so that they could create a
Speaker 6: managerial class and a wealth gap out of a knowledge gap. First, right,
Speaker 6: That's what I see through our researches.
Speaker 3: It's what Tim has said. It is for sure a siyop.
Speaker 3: I do believe that the educational system, especially from pre
Speaker 3: kinder all the way to twelve, is a false sense
Speaker 3: of security in that it is telling the masses we
Speaker 3: are educating your people. But if you've spent any time
Speaker 3: in the public system, I've taught system. You realize how
Speaker 3: dumb down and watered down the educational system is. They
Speaker 3: tell you they're teaching you about arithmetic, I'm sorry about grammar, spelling, rhetoric.
Speaker 3: What have you yet? And I've also taught at the college.
Speaker 3: No one can write everyone. I mean even before chat
Speaker 3: GPT came onboard, no one was able to even write
Speaker 3: a comprehensive or a comprehendible paragraph. And now we have
Speaker 3: chat GPT writing everything. So transition learning has now been
Speaker 3: yanked out of their hands and willingly. And so when
Speaker 3: you see most of these rhetoric, grammar and everything being
Speaker 3: at the highest institutions, yes that is true. But even
Speaker 3: when you go to universities at the state level or
Speaker 3: you still see at what happened in the high school
Speaker 3: middle school never really progressed. And so when you even
Speaker 3: look at science writing, that has also taken a huge hit.
Speaker 3: If you look at scientific journal, like in the nineteen twenties,
Speaker 3: nineteen hundreds, it's beautiful, it's written beautifully. Everything is handwritten.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry, everything is hand drawn, you know obviously because
Speaker 3: or whatever read something now it is so technical and
Speaker 3: so boring and so dry. You don't even want to
Speaker 3: finish it, So everything has been infiltrated in this false
Speaker 3: sense of security. It's like, yeah, we're educating everybody. Hey,
Speaker 3: you can get click on the internet, you have all
Speaker 3: the information available to you. But do you really because
Speaker 3: I genuinely feel that the human mind has regressed in
Speaker 3: terms of education or even being able to express themselves
Speaker 3: through communication, which is a trivium.
Speaker 1: So I think you can see this very clearly in
Speaker 1: the syllabus for any course that you want to take.
Speaker 1: They list out the trivium right there in the syllabus,
Speaker 1: but they don't have it labeled as the trivium. So
Speaker 1: they're telling you all of the pieces, all of the
Speaker 1: grammar of that course. They're telling you how it all
Speaker 1: fits the other end, they're telling you the presentation of
Speaker 1: it all in that syllabus, but they don't label it.
Speaker 1: So what they're essentially doing is they're saying, we can
Speaker 1: take way the knowledge of how these things work while
Speaker 1: still providing the bare bones assets that can make a
Speaker 1: person feel educated.
Speaker 3: Correct, correct, And then you look at people being educated
Speaker 3: and you want that, and you go to that and
Speaker 3: you realize you can't. It's no different than looking at
Speaker 3: celebrities and seeing their life, but you know you will
Speaker 3: never attain it. It is a yeah, it's the unattainable.
Speaker 2: Really.
Speaker 4: You know, it's kind of funny too if you look
Speaker 4: at the way politically these days, how people are polarize.
Speaker 4: Both sides seem to have this sense of this in
Speaker 4: knowing that the other side doesn't have that. They seem
Speaker 4: to think that they have this understanding that you don't,
Speaker 4: and then the cockiness comes out, you know what I'm saying,
Speaker 4: And it's like you're actually just all ignorant and arguing.
Speaker 2: At each other.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 6: So I've got a couple different versions of the trivium.
Speaker 6: You talked about us being deliberately dumb, dumbed down, and
Speaker 6: so when I'm sure you guys are all familiar with
Speaker 6: John Taylor Gatto and Charlotte is There Big they wrote
Speaker 6: on the Prussian education system being adopted by the American
Speaker 6: education reformers. They both point directly to the liberal arts
Speaker 6: and the trivium being inserted into higher education as the
Speaker 6: reason for this. Si op, Okay, that's one. That's the
Speaker 6: education system, one aspect of it. Marshall mccluan also wrote
Speaker 6: the classical Trivium so there is some debate as to
Speaker 6: which one you're supposed to actually be reading. Marshall McLuhan's
Speaker 6: a member of the elite, so I have yet to
Speaker 6: read this. I wanted to make sure that I fully
Speaker 6: established myself as far as the tribum goes, make sure
Speaker 6: nothing falls apart here before I started getting into those.
Speaker 6: Here's another one. You guys are probably familiar with. This one,
Speaker 6: the classical liberal arts or grammar logic rhetoric spelled put
Speaker 6: into the right sequence, and then it's just sort of
Speaker 6: it's easy reading. It's like one page has one topic
Speaker 6: and it's got some pictures, and so that goes with
Speaker 6: this one, the quadrum, and so it gets into all
Speaker 6: the different shapes geometry and the four aspects of knowledge
Speaker 6: under the quadruvium. And then the one that I actually
Speaker 6: prefer to read is Sister Mariam Joseph's, and she actually
Speaker 6: reverses the grammar logic rhetoric, but there's so much knowledge
Speaker 6: in there, and that's the one that I steer people towards,
Speaker 6: especially chapter one and chapter nine into the logical fallacy.
Speaker 1: Sister Mary Joseph is a very interesting character when it
Speaker 1: comes to this. Was it she paid by the Rockefellers
Speaker 1: to be the personal tutor for a lot of these
Speaker 1: elitists that came out of there.
Speaker 6: I don't know, but that wouldn't surprise me.
Speaker 1: That's sort of how they do it, is they have
Speaker 1: this group of specialized tutors that go around and train
Speaker 1: the elites and thinking through the trivia and you have
Speaker 1: to kind of go through that course before you can
Speaker 1: become a high level member. And her book is one
Speaker 1: of those things that you're not supposed to know about,
Speaker 1: kind of like the Tragedy and Hope. That's another book
Speaker 1: you're just not supposed to know about. And what's interesting
Speaker 1: too is I know we probably have a lot of
Speaker 1: disagreements with the guy Richard, but the guy at Tragedy
Speaker 1: and Hope is being center off of Spotify. If you
Speaker 1: go to his show, the Grand Theft World podcast, it's
Speaker 1: not available in the United States. He's broadcasting from the
Speaker 1: United States, but it's not available in the United States
Speaker 1: because he's teaching people to trivia method and that's not allowable.
Speaker 1: Once you reach a certain point of popularity, they've got
Speaker 1: to cut your access off.
Speaker 6: Well, I will say if I can interrupt her that
Speaker 6: Richard Grove is a gatekeeper. This is one thing that
Speaker 6: I've totally found is that he will not talk about progressivism.
Speaker 6: He won't talk about the myth of human progress. He
Speaker 6: won't mention Lewis Brandeis, Walter Littman, Felix, Frankfurter, JP Morgan,
Speaker 6: all these founders of progressivism that really instituted everything in
Speaker 6: our modern world. They just stopped short. Like the technocracy
Speaker 6: is the beginning of history, just like FDR is the
Speaker 6: beginning of history. We've got to go back to Woodrow
Speaker 6: Wilson in the beginnings nineteen hundred to nineteen twenty to
Speaker 6: really see where everything that we're fighting against today was established,
Speaker 6: including the Federal Reserve, taxation, federal trade commissions, surveillance, the
Speaker 6: administrative state. All of these things were established under Woodrow
Speaker 6: Wilson's New Freedom nineteen twelve. And the architect of all
Speaker 6: of that was the first Jewish US Supreme Court, Justice
Speaker 6: Lewis D. Brandeis. So these things just start to blow
Speaker 6: your mind.
Speaker 5: Speaking of going back, I mean, I've got to think
Speaker 5: that the industrial Revolution had a hand in this, in
Speaker 5: creating a worker class. And I was just looking up
Speaker 5: some dates here that Marshall mcluan. He starts to come
Speaker 5: on the scene right around the time that Rockefeller dies.
Speaker 5: So it's like, Okay, you got Rockefeller and Carnegie and
Speaker 5: those guys who are kind of around for some that
Speaker 5: Industrial Revolution dying off, and it looks like they're maybe
Speaker 5: bringing in this new wave of people like mclu and
Speaker 5: to kind of carry the baton. But you said something
Speaker 5: about a gap and a knowledge class, and I've got
Speaker 5: to think that there's a lot of this was seeded
Speaker 5: in that Industrial Revolution where they created the nine to
Speaker 5: five zombie who doesn't have enough time to even study
Speaker 5: to know what's happening.
Speaker 6: Yep, And that's Lewis Brandeis. That's set precedent for eight
Speaker 6: hour work days, five day work weeks. I mean it
Speaker 6: wasn't fully I mean there's been alterations to that throughout
Speaker 6: the years, but he basically sets precedent with what they
Speaker 6: called the Protocol of Peace, and so Brandeis brings together
Speaker 6: labor and capital because the worker didn't want to be
Speaker 6: scientifically managed. This is one of the terms that Brandeis
Speaker 6: apparently coins the Principles of Scientific Management written by Frederick
Speaker 6: Winslow Taylor, and this is another aspect that Richard Grove
Speaker 6: and all of these guys won't get into. It's a
Speaker 6: real great indicator as to whether they're not they're gatekeepers
Speaker 6: and whether or not they're trying to keep information from
Speaker 6: you is when you introduce the idea of scientific management.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 6: I've talked to Derek Brose about this. He's blocked me
Speaker 6: from every conceivable social media arena because I reminded him
Speaker 6: when Musk started doing this efficiency movement. He was wondering
Speaker 6: where this all came from, and I reminded him that
Speaker 6: it comes from the progressive era in nineteen seventeen. They
Speaker 6: created this efficiency movement from this book, The Principles of
Speaker 6: Scientific Management, from where Lewis Brandeis coins the term and
Speaker 6: on the cover I'll show you through this little presentation
Speaker 6: on the cover is a fascies. What a surprise, Public
Speaker 6: private partnerships right, and the building up of the military preparedness.
Speaker 6: This all starts to happen in the preparation for World
Speaker 6: War One, and surprisingly a lot earlier than most things.
Speaker 6: Nineteen ten, Brandeis is already thinking about land for the
Speaker 6: Jews in Turkey. He's already talking about this in his
Speaker 6: own writings as early as nineteen ten is what we've found.
Speaker 1: Right, and I think if you want to go back
Speaker 1: even further, the Platonic philosophers put forward the idea of
Speaker 1: the Seven Holy Sciences, and what you see with the
Speaker 1: writings of Julian the Apostle as he's talking about what
Speaker 1: Christianity was doing, it was dumbing everybody down and getting
Speaker 1: them out of understanding the Seven Holy Sciences, which was
Speaker 1: one of the main purposes of spreading Christianity is you
Speaker 1: had to get people into this sort of loop of
Speaker 1: you know, you've got questions, Well, there's a God of
Speaker 1: the gaps for that, we don't need to answer those questions.
Speaker 1: And what we end up finding over and over again
Speaker 1: is that these seven Holy Sciences, the Trivium, and the Quadrivium,
Speaker 1: keep popping up despite that. So, despite all of these problems,
Speaker 1: you still have to have a rulership class that may
Speaker 1: tained some sense of I guess legitimate authoritative knowledge base.
Speaker 1: And so as much as they'd love to get rid
Speaker 1: of the you know, the Trivium and the Quadrivium, it
Speaker 1: doesn't seem to work out that way because you need
Speaker 1: at least somebody competent pushing these these lovers of society.
Speaker 6: Yeah, Walter Lippman said that the society, this great society
Speaker 6: that they were creating, couldn't be governed by men that
Speaker 6: knew the difference between right and wrong, but only by
Speaker 6: the technique that created it. That's nineteen twenty one, and
Speaker 6: so he coins the term stereotype. The entering wedge is
Speaker 6: what he called the expert. I'll think about that for
Speaker 6: a second, right, And these guys are the ones that
Speaker 6: established the trade union, right, So this is really what
Speaker 6: the trade union is. It's a it's a scientific expert
Speaker 6: getting between man capital m and his labor. A lot
Speaker 6: of people look to the trade union as a place
Speaker 6: where it empowers the individual.
Speaker 1: Well it doesn't.
Speaker 6: It's far easier to manipulate or coerce a board of
Speaker 6: people that you're actually familiar with and friends with than
Speaker 6: the millions of workers around the world. So this is
Speaker 6: why they establish trade unionism along with labor relations and
Speaker 6: scientific management. If you guys have ever watched the movie Metropolis,
Speaker 6: that's really the storyline of the whole movie is that
Speaker 6: guy brings labor and capital together and they're being fed
Speaker 6: into this big fire breathing machine that's called moshok. Now
Speaker 6: that's one of the first ever movies. Incredible, right, It
Speaker 6: really sets as illness in real life.
Speaker 1: It really sets the precedent. And you see in all
Speaker 1: the clip shows that show these old fashioned kind of
Speaker 1: movies all smashed together, you see all kind of clips
Speaker 1: from this first original sci fi epic, and what we
Speaker 1: have now is pretty much nothing but sci fi epics
Speaker 1: because it's within that genre of movie that you can
Speaker 1: start to establish the knowledge classes.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: So you've got these characters that embody these archetypes that
Speaker 1: essentially have magical powers, right, and they don't need to
Speaker 1: think through things. It just comes to them, right, And
Speaker 1: so that's who we emulate. That's who we try to be. Like,
Speaker 1: that's sort of the narrative wall that we face is
Speaker 1: because really, if you're a hero, you don't need any
Speaker 1: kind of supporting knowledge base. If you look back at
Speaker 1: the Greek myths, there's always a supporting knowledge base. They
Speaker 1: always have to have help from this outside source that
Speaker 1: gives them the ability to see and to know what
Speaker 1: the right path is. But if you eliminate that knowledge
Speaker 1: base from your heroes, it just comes to you. You
Speaker 1: don't need a knowledge base, And so a lot of
Speaker 1: what the sci fi narrative is is drawing upon the
Speaker 1: idea of you don't need knowledge, you just need divine intervention.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think you nailed it for I saw that
Speaker 4: prevalent in the occult community, and I think huge in
Speaker 4: the fucking conspiracy community.
Speaker 2: I think you just nailed it right there.
Speaker 4: We're always looking for somebody else to give us the
Speaker 4: fucking answers man.
Speaker 6: Yep, scare looking for our next savior rather than because
Speaker 6: this new world order actually lives within us, we have
Speaker 6: to actually take responsibility for our own actions here because
Speaker 6: we are all so deeply enveloped and immersed in the
Speaker 6: myth of human progress. We've all got our phones, we
Speaker 6: all look to ease inconvenience or for our own security.
Speaker 6: I mean, this is how they exploited us.
Speaker 1: It's about standing out from the pack, right, because what
Speaker 1: you see with the teaching of rhetoric is that you
Speaker 1: automatically as you're presenting your ideas that you formulated from
Speaker 1: these different realms of knowledge, you have to present that
Speaker 1: in a convincing way. Well, most humans are afraid of
Speaker 1: standing out from the pack. They're afraid of speaking in
Speaker 1: front of an audience. They're afraid of being in that role,
Speaker 1: and this form of education really fosters that fear of
Speaker 1: being able to present, and it keeps people in that
Speaker 1: box of not being able to speak what's in their
Speaker 1: minds and what's in their hearts.
Speaker 3: The first, very first notable person who did that was
Speaker 3: Paracelsius and he got kicked out of, you know, is
Speaker 3: his college and was never allowed his name was never
Speaker 3: allowed to be spoken again. So the institution has its
Speaker 3: own methods of muzzling people who are odd against the
Speaker 3: try for sure.
Speaker 4: You know what's interesting too, a lot of people that
Speaker 4: we have covered on our show, they always end up
Speaker 4: starting like their own thing too.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And it's like that is that because like you
Speaker 2: even know that going.
Speaker 4: To a regular place for education is bullshit because it's
Speaker 4: like you almost see a bunch of polymantle going there
Speaker 4: as well, right, yeah, So it's just like they even
Speaker 4: saying this education stuff is crab.
Speaker 1: With the case of Paracelsus, he was rebelled against the
Speaker 1: galen orthodoxy because for thousands of years, Galen had been
Speaker 1: the standard of medical practice, and so they had never
Speaker 1: changed that for thousands of years. By the time Paracelsis
Speaker 1: comes out and says the dose makes the poison. All
Speaker 1: these other revolutionary concepts that these guys weren't ready to
Speaker 1: hear because they were very firmly established in their institutions right.
Speaker 5: The followers of Paracelsus as well, Like I'm thinking about
Speaker 5: Johannes Kelpus, who came over here to get away from
Speaker 5: basically religious persecution, although he was more of an alchemist ocultist,
Speaker 5: but they were persecuted by the state and by the
Speaker 5: church at that point. But he had the Paracelsis spirit
Speaker 5: of rebellion, and he came over here to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Speaker 5: because at the time, this was the late sixteen hundreds,
Speaker 5: I think at the time, Pennsylvania had the loosest religion
Speaker 5: laws on the plane in it. And that's awesome, but
Speaker 5: it's it's it's kind of sad to see where it's
Speaker 5: gone because that's not what this American experiment turned into.
Speaker 5: Because look what we have here is we have this
Speaker 5: combination of labor, capitalism, scientism, and for some reason, there's
Speaker 5: like a Protestant facade here. It's as if they wanted
Speaker 5: they like to put on the Protestant facade for some reason,
Speaker 5: like it fits their model but that spirit that that
Speaker 5: Kelpius brought with him is no longer here, and I
Speaker 5: think it was uprooted by these these institutions, and I
Speaker 5: think it goes back to in my research at least
Speaker 5: to that sixteen sixty six Royal Society and the influence
Speaker 5: that it had.
Speaker 6: Oh wow, say, can you sort of elaborate on that
Speaker 6: sixteen sixty six in the Royal Society For me.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I think that's the right date the British Royal Society.
Speaker 6: I think we were going to get to that too.
Speaker 5: At sixteen s sixty six. And it was kind of
Speaker 5: like if if you read the like the Room for
Speaker 5: that period of time, it was like the last of
Speaker 5: the Alchemists in the beginning of the first scientists, right,
Speaker 5: they were kind of pushing out the old way and
Speaker 5: bringing in this new stuff. It was you know, you've
Speaker 5: got that rural society movement would would go on to
Speaker 5: kind of end up the Marxist stuff, the fraudy and
Speaker 5: Freudian stuff, and you get your your bulldog Marxist bulldog Huxley,
Speaker 5: the original Huxley, coming out of that rural society and
Speaker 5: he's out in the institutions in the eighteen hundreds really
Speaker 5: pushing this theory of Marxism and Darwinism as well. I
Speaker 5: forgot to mention Darwin, but he was and you know
Speaker 5: there were he was a big He kind of broke
Speaker 5: the seal for Darwinism and for Evily to kind of
Speaker 5: be inducted into the public schools eventually over here, but
Speaker 5: it started over there at the rural society.
Speaker 6: Right, Okay, Well, Darwinism is integral to all of this too,
Speaker 6: and this is another aspect of the sy op. They
Speaker 6: wanted society to think that we evolve and we move forward.
Speaker 6: Compty August Compty's positivism also assists in it. It doesn't
Speaker 6: allow us to stop and ask questions. So oftentimes when
Speaker 6: we ask about, you know, what their claims are about
Speaker 6: climate change, global warming, we're asked to sit down and
Speaker 6: shut up. That the science has settled is another great
Speaker 6: way to say that, that's really Compty's positivism. So yeah,
Speaker 6: to understand the philosophical approach here actually would have probably
Speaker 6: been the fastest, most expedient way for us to all
Speaker 6: understand this world, because those Enlightenment thinkers is where all
Speaker 6: of this started. You think about the basis of it,
Speaker 6: of Enlightenment. It was to step away from the Church.
Speaker 6: It was man versus God, man saying, Okay, I can
Speaker 6: go and measure and calculate and quantify my environment, and
Speaker 6: then I can make decisions as to where I want
Speaker 6: to go. So it was really a split from the Church.
Speaker 6: And so we see it from the scientific revolution and
Speaker 6: really the introduction of Copernicus's heliocentric model. This is really
Speaker 6: where everything kind of starts. And so if I may,
Speaker 6: if you guys don't mind, can I go through a
Speaker 6: few slides here just to sort of show where we
Speaker 6: went and how they've established this knowledge gap of the trivium.
Speaker 6: The liberal arts established it for themselves to manage society.
Speaker 6: You guys don't mind it?
Speaker 2: No, no, no, please please.
Speaker 6: I'm going to share the history of the College of
Speaker 6: William and Mary first, because you know, Harvard was around
Speaker 6: before that, and Harvard is obviously important even today. Everything
Speaker 6: comes out of Harvard, Harvard Law School, and this is
Speaker 6: really where all these progressives come from, this Harvard Law School.
Speaker 6: But I wanted to show that the history of the
Speaker 6: College of William and Mary because this is where Phi
Speaker 6: beta Kappa comes from. Okay, Now, all of these people
Speaker 6: are also Phi beta Kappa in the most amazing way.
Speaker 6: So we get to the Ren Building, which was the
Speaker 6: first building there, okay, sixteen ninety five, took four years
Speaker 6: to build it. And who built it but Sir Christopher Wren.
Speaker 6: Who is he? But he's a founder of the Royal Society.
Speaker 2: Astronomer too, mathematician.
Speaker 6: Wren was a yeah, and so he's he's deeply educated
Speaker 6: on the trivium the liberal arts. And this is the
Speaker 6: pattern we still see today that you know, most of
Speaker 6: those that are engineering our society have Master of Arts
Speaker 6: degrees because they can create stories. We talk about the
Speaker 6: tell of vision. Well, these guys are great storytellers. You
Speaker 6: see he's received as MAA in sixteen fifty three and
Speaker 6: this education hasn't changed much. So this is really the
Speaker 6: deepest knowledge that they're going to give people. And this
Speaker 6: is why the managerial class is basically all infused with
Speaker 6: this knowledge because they can trick and fool, they can
Speaker 6: lie to people and get away with it. And so
Speaker 6: what did they call that? We've already referred to it
Speaker 6: today as the invisible college. And when you read here,
Speaker 6: the invisible college is a term used to describe a
Speaker 6: non public network of researchers operating in an informal way. Well,
Speaker 6: isn't that really the same thing is you know, not
Speaker 6: for profit organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations. Well,
Speaker 6: this is where royal society comes from. And so Christopher
Speaker 6: Wrenz in with the guy that actually lays out Washington and.
Speaker 1: So another important aspect of the College of William and
Speaker 1: Mary is their beginning of the Greek fraternity system in
Speaker 1: all of the college. That's where it sprang from. So
Speaker 1: when you understand that and understand this is how they
Speaker 1: would segment off and pipeline these people into positions of
Speaker 1: power and authority using these uh you know, fraternal orders.
Speaker 1: That's that's kind of the basis of our country, instead
Speaker 1: of this democratic system where people are allowed to, you know,
Speaker 1: rise through the ranks on their own. It's it's all
Speaker 1: kind of a graft. It's it's a you know, it's
Speaker 1: a scam.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and you can see very clearly the Hebrew involved.
Speaker 6: And then I haven't been able to get into this
Speaker 6: too much because I just noticed it this morning. I
Speaker 6: was like, wow, But there you go. There's the invisible College.
Speaker 6: And they call it the emblematic image of the Rosicrucian
Speaker 6: College here.
Speaker 4: That's like on the end of every Rosicrution, the first
Speaker 4: two Rosicrution books too.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 6: So there you go, this whole idea of scientific management.
Speaker 5: Duane. That Royal Society was started. I think I came
Speaker 5: in cold when I said a sixteen sixty six. It
Speaker 5: was sixteen sixty.
Speaker 6: Oh.
Speaker 5: I just wanted to add that this in for context,
Speaker 5: because I think it goes with your slide show here.
Speaker 5: It's the official definition or whatever statement is that it's
Speaker 5: a learned society and it was the United Kingdom's National
Speaker 5: Academy of Sciences, and the society fulfills a number of
Speaker 5: roles promoting science and it's benefit. So it's the rise
Speaker 5: of scientism. And it's one of these clubs.
Speaker 6: It's a club.
Speaker 5: It's not as a it's like a private club. But
Speaker 5: yet somehow they managed to persuade governments and and sort
Speaker 5: of run things from behind the scenes.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 6: And it's out of the Royal Society that they created
Speaker 6: the piltdown Manhooks, where they took an ape mandible a
Speaker 6: lower job of ape, and then the skull of a
Speaker 6: human buried it intentionally. I think they might have even
Speaker 6: covered it in coffee grinds to make it look aged,
Speaker 6: and then it was members of the Royal Society that
Speaker 6: undug it and said, hey, we found the missing link.
Speaker 6: And it lasted for fifty years before somebody actually tested
Speaker 6: and said no, this is fraudulent, And so we're still
Speaker 6: sitting there. It's still a theory of evolution.
Speaker 1: Y know.
Speaker 4: Have you ever wondered if like certain archaeolog archaeological digs
Speaker 4: are actually fraudulent totally?
Speaker 2: I wondered about that.
Speaker 1: A good example of that is the ketzel kowatless right,
Speaker 1: And so Boeing was funding the excavation of these ketsl kowatlesses,
Speaker 1: and they were originally going to call it the Boeing bird,
Speaker 1: but they thought that'd be a little bit too obvious.
Speaker 1: So this, the biggest tarodon to ever exist, was financed
Speaker 1: by the Boeing corporation, who makes airplanes, to dig this
Speaker 1: thing up. What are the odds that it was just
Speaker 1: faked because they wanted to attach their name to the
Speaker 1: biggest bird ever found.
Speaker 4: Sure, Now there's just like even like certain like occult
Speaker 4: artifacts and certain things, It's like I do wonder if
Speaker 4: like the real shit's getting picked up and you just
Speaker 4: recreate a fake one and you're like, look what we found, right?
Speaker 1: Well, right, But if you apply physics to a lot
Speaker 1: of these dinosaurs, you're like, no, this doesn't work. This
Speaker 1: is all made up, And you know, there could be
Speaker 1: a possible, you know, missing piece. They do have a
Speaker 1: lot of bone fragments, but to put those bone fragments
Speaker 1: together in any kind of rational way, they really didn't
Speaker 1: do their jobs too well. If you were going to
Speaker 1: put together a dog bone skeleton and then compare it
Speaker 1: against what you see with the dinosaurs, you see that
Speaker 1: there's a lot of differences that you necessarily wouldn't know
Speaker 1: unless you've seen the animal. So on one hand, it's
Speaker 1: fake and on the other hand, it's fake. So at
Speaker 1: some point we've got to understand that because you know,
Speaker 1: basically they can control how we see ourselves based off
Speaker 1: of this archaeological evidence and where we come from.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I think it's crucial to point out what Dwayne
Speaker 5: said about evolution is still a theory, you know. I
Speaker 5: mean it seems to me that it was an idea
Speaker 5: that got brought forward by these private clubs and then
Speaker 5: pushed out by the state. And I tell people like
Speaker 5: if you want to believe evolution, that's fine, but just
Speaker 5: know that that's what they want you to believe. This
Speaker 5: is something that has been sort of pushed on us.
Speaker 5: It's coming out through the airbents essentially.
Speaker 3: I would agree. I would one hundred percent agree because
Speaker 3: when you actually read the text on the origins doesn't
Speaker 3: talk about evolution. It talks about natural selection. So it's
Speaker 3: almost like a bash the entire text. Yeah, he went
Speaker 3: into Ecuador and he was looking at finches. He wasn't
Speaker 3: saying it applies to the rest of the world. I
Speaker 3: was just saying that nietches were filled based on the
Speaker 3: availability of resources.
Speaker 6: Right, And most people think that Darwin got or Herbert
Speaker 6: Spencer derived his ideas from Darwin, but it's really the reverse, gotcha.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's exactly right.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 1: They needed a patsy, And I think that's what this
Speaker 1: whole system really comes down to, is these private clubs,
Speaker 1: all these other sort of non governmental institutions, they need
Speaker 1: a patsy to push forward their new narratives, and so
Speaker 1: we find that over and over again. I think Elon
Speaker 1: Musk represents one of these figures that is a patsy figure.
Speaker 1: If you'll look back at his own history, you find
Speaker 1: that his I believe it was his grandfather was the
Speaker 1: head of the Technocratic Society of Canada Actocraticussie. There you go.
Speaker 6: Yep, Joshua Haldeman. He founded the technocracy up here in Canada.
Speaker 6: And you know, basically up until about fifteen years ago,
Speaker 6: you would see these technocracy buildings and over my life,
Speaker 6: I'm fifty something years old, and when I remember my
Speaker 6: first memories of that, there were still people going in
Speaker 6: and out of those places and they were open for business.
Speaker 6: But you know, over the thirty years they all shut
Speaker 6: down and no, you can no longer find any of
Speaker 6: those tech Democracy buildings anymore. I'd see them all the time.
Speaker 6: But yep, Joshua Haldeman is one of the founders. So
Speaker 6: they this is the Technicateue of America, is what they
Speaker 6: they've established, and so we should probably.
Speaker 3: But weren't they kicked out of Canada. That's why he
Speaker 3: fled to South Africa.
Speaker 6: Yeah, he personally was kicked out for I'm not sure what,
Speaker 6: but he actually ran for Premier of Saskatchewan on a
Speaker 6: couple occasions under the Social Democrat h title I think,
Speaker 6: which is I believe.
Speaker 3: That technocratic society was something that was being banned and outlawed,
Speaker 3: and that's what he fled. I mean, he was a
Speaker 3: chiropractor by trade, but they started this whole technocratic society
Speaker 3: and then I believe the area he was in was
Speaker 3: quickly I guess catching on and banned technocratic technocraticisms in
Speaker 3: the area.
Speaker 6: Well, he had.
Speaker 1: Embezzled a lot of money from the.
Speaker 6: Mean, yeah, no, exactly, like and I would say that
Speaker 6: the technocracy just kind of went underground and mainstream like
Speaker 6: MK ultra. Did you know they said, oh, we closed
Speaker 6: it all down, Well, it just went mainstream.
Speaker 5: Was it a Huxley? Do you think involved with with
Speaker 5: with the aid with aiding?
Speaker 2: That was it?
Speaker 6: You know?
Speaker 5: Aldus Huxley perhaps with books like uh oh, what's his
Speaker 5: book called?
Speaker 1: World?
Speaker 6: Was that established on? Well?
Speaker 5: Did you Was there an MK ulture aspect to that?
Speaker 5: To get the public into a certain mind?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 6: I In one of my articles, I say that oldest
Speaker 6: Huxley was actually the head of MK Ultra. Well that's crazy,
Speaker 6: but I'm not the one that said it. It was
Speaker 6: the it was the head of the military at the time,
Speaker 6: and I can't remember his name, but I've got it
Speaker 6: all documented. It's actually on my YouTube site at the
Speaker 6: History of Propaganda. Uh damn.
Speaker 5: His dad is Thomas Henry Huxley, Darwin's bulldog.
Speaker 6: Yeah, oh yeah, this is this is all about the
Speaker 6: elite aristocracy. These are all members of the aristocracy, the
Speaker 6: Cambridge Apostles. They're all bisexual and highly intellectual. And so
Speaker 6: this is really where the formation of political salons comes from,
Speaker 6: where they sit around the house and sort of hash
Speaker 6: out these ideas. And this comes from the French Revolution,
Speaker 6: which comes from out of the founders of liberalism and
Speaker 6: the Enlightenment thinkers. So you can start to see there's
Speaker 6: a continuity that goes all the way back. Every time
Speaker 6: you start to look into the backgrounds of some of
Speaker 6: these people in our modern world, they go all the
Speaker 6: way back and their schools of thought back to these
Speaker 6: Enlightenment thinkers, the founders of what we call liberalism today.
Speaker 1: One of the things that sorry, one of the things
Speaker 1: that caught my attention about the history of trade unions
Speaker 1: in America is that oftentimes these trade unionists would have
Speaker 1: a freemason, so called independent negotiating for them between capital
Speaker 1: and labor. I think you know, the call was coming
Speaker 1: inside the house you know, they were to established this
Speaker 1: sort of unification of labor and capital, and the Freemasons
Speaker 1: that were negotiating these terms were part of that.
Speaker 6: Yeah, there warn't fought. You know, the worker didn't want
Speaker 6: to be scientifically management and thrown into a factory. He
Speaker 6: was quite happy doing other things.
Speaker 4: So yeah, go ahead, Lisa, did you want to say something.
Speaker 3: No, just really quickly. Julian Huxley was one of the
Speaker 3: considered architects of the evolutionary pushing theory and as well
Speaker 3: as eugenics. This is where we get most of our
Speaker 3: influence from is from him.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I mean.
Speaker 3: A lot, a lot of his writing in the early ages,
Speaker 3: in the early time of it all. He's very integral
Speaker 3: into all of this.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: And the dad there again was Thomas Huxley, who I
Speaker 5: think he died in eighteen ninety five. So while Huxley,
Speaker 5: old man Huxley's alive pushing Charles Darwin out there for everyone,
Speaker 5: what you see sort of hand in hand happening over
Speaker 5: here in the States is this John Wesley Powell working
Speaker 5: with the sism my goodness, Smithsonian in eighteen eighty And
Speaker 5: if you look at that group of people that he
Speaker 5: kind of compiled. This was all in Washington, d C.
Speaker 5: This is the private clubs in Washington, DC working behind
Speaker 5: the scenes to sort of perpetuate this public narrative. But
Speaker 5: with Powell, he's got this group of the Cosmos Club,
Speaker 5: and it's all these guys in Harvard, the father of
Speaker 5: you know, they've got this guy who's the father of
Speaker 5: Matt Making. In America, they've got the founding members of
Speaker 5: the National Geographic Society. They've got the American Association of
Speaker 5: Geographic Geographers. They've got the US Geological Survey guys. They've
Speaker 5: got American Philosophical Society guys, Bureau of Ethnology, Literary Society
Speaker 5: of Washington, Philadelphia, Shakespeare Club, Librarians of the Smithsonian, Librarians
Speaker 5: of Congress. You see where this is going. All these
Speaker 5: clubs are under basically essentially one roof. When you look
Speaker 5: at the people involved, and they're working hand in hand
Speaker 5: with what's happening over in Europe with people like Thomas
Speaker 5: Huxley as wow.
Speaker 6: Yeah, And it says here on that Wikipedia page of
Speaker 6: John Wesley Powell. Believing that progress was linear and inevitable,
Speaker 6: Powell advocated for government funding to be used to civilize
Speaker 6: Native American population and mentioning social Darwinist Herbert Spencer here
Speaker 6: too as well on his page, so you can see
Speaker 6: he's just another member of this overall movement I was
Speaker 6: not familiar with. But yeah, there's definitely some research to
Speaker 6: be done on this guy. Yeah he goes back to
Speaker 6: Garfield even.
Speaker 5: Yeah, he was He was in a Bureau of Ethnology
Speaker 5: that was a branch of the Smithsone. He wrote a
Speaker 5: paper in eighteen eighty about how they want to conduct
Speaker 5: archaeological digs and stuff. Basically, they just covered up a
Speaker 5: bunch of ancient history over here. I think in recent
Speaker 5: years people will be more familiar with this idea of
Speaker 5: the giant bones. You know, I'll set that on the
Speaker 5: table and just kind of leave it alone, but like
Speaker 5: for this conversation. But it's not just giant bones. They
Speaker 5: were covering up ancient sites. And I've got a whole
Speaker 5: list of dams and man made lakes that were put
Speaker 5: in over here to flood ancient sites, and Wesley Powell
Speaker 5: is a huge.
Speaker 6: Part of that. They do that up here too. There's
Speaker 6: two within driving distance of me that you can see
Speaker 6: through the lake, but you can't go and look at
Speaker 6: it and walk around and pick up things.
Speaker 5: Oh you you want to.
Speaker 6: Ancient of some sort.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Man, Yeah, if you think about the names of those lakes,
Speaker 5: give them to me, because I will.
Speaker 2: That I wanted to bring up.
Speaker 4: It's just kind of like a little little law like
Speaker 4: kind of ties into stuff that we were just talking about.
Speaker 4: And it's just because like I made a connection twice
Speaker 4: now with the way I was thinking where you guys
Speaker 4: were talking. You were you know, we were talking about
Speaker 4: earlier kind of like like at some point I even
Speaker 4: feel like there was a cultist within the Catholic Church
Speaker 4: and you know, like they were making some advancements and
Speaker 4: then like it just seems like they were told to
Speaker 4: stop and uh, you know whatever reason. I can't you know,
Speaker 4: figure out why. But then you mentioned Cabridge University, and
Speaker 4: that reminded me of how that is kind of like
Speaker 4: a religious looking place and that I have. This just
Speaker 4: reminded me of when me and Lux one time had
Speaker 4: covered Shakespeare. A book on Shakespeare that was like people
Speaker 4: from different colleges kind of like putting their ideas or
Speaker 4: their opinions about certain stuff. And there was somebody putting
Speaker 4: Shakespeare in the matrix together and we started actually looking
Speaker 4: into the book and the people that were writing in
Speaker 4: this book and where they came from, and we noticed
Speaker 4: a lot of them were part of this Fulbright program
Speaker 4: that was always attached to these schools that had this
Speaker 4: huge Catholic fucking look to it. But then when you
Speaker 4: check to see what the Fulbright program does, it actually
Speaker 4: sends you. Most of the time, it sends you over
Speaker 4: to Degueth University. And if you go over there and
Speaker 4: look at their website, it is completely fucking radicalized.
Speaker 2: Marx is right on the front of it.
Speaker 4: And it's like, how are you getting from the Catholic
Speaker 4: Church looked to this now through fucking school and in
Speaker 4: doctor Nation and programs that are paying your way.
Speaker 1: I think I got an answer to that. So what
Speaker 1: we've seen in the past, you know, two hundred or
Speaker 1: so years, is a total misappropriation of the term eugenics.
Speaker 1: Eugenics was first associated with animal husbandry, getting the best
Speaker 1: possible fitness out of your animals, right, And what you
Speaker 1: see today is them. I mean, just recently the Builderberg
Speaker 1: Group set on their website that they're interested in depopulating
Speaker 1: the world. This is the first time they've come out
Speaker 1: and actually set it openly. I'm sure you've got all
Speaker 1: the other different organizations like the Club of Rome and
Speaker 1: stuff like that talking about it openly, but never has
Speaker 1: the Build a Berg group openly talked about this depopulation.
Speaker 1: Depopulation is the exact opposite of eugenics. You're not actually
Speaker 1: creating a fitter race. You're making people a lot more stupid,
Speaker 1: right if you look at the trivium, this is sort
Speaker 1: of an epigenetic marker that you're going to have a
Speaker 1: fitter race because people can think for themselves. But the
Speaker 1: more you bastardize this term eugenics because they want you to.
Speaker 1: They want you to demonize eugenics. They don't want you
Speaker 1: to think of yourself as an autonomous individual looking for
Speaker 1: the best fitness and production for yourself or your family
Speaker 1: in the future. They want you thinking about it as
Speaker 1: if this is the elite ideology. The sad fact of
Speaker 1: the matter is it came from farmers. You know, these
Speaker 1: farmers learn the tools of eugen in their daily craft,
Speaker 1: and now they're using it as a means of telling everybody, Hey,
Speaker 1: guess what if you don't like eugenics, Well, if you
Speaker 1: like eugenics, you're a Nazi. But it's like, wait a second,
Speaker 1: you're telling me that if I want the best for
Speaker 1: my kids and for their future, that's a bad thing.
Speaker 1: And it's always associated with abortion too. Eugenics, you know,
Speaker 1: you're killing off a future generation and there's no real
Speaker 1: reason to say that they're going to turn out badly.
Speaker 1: It used to be that they would do these programs
Speaker 1: in the South and try to target specific races, and
Speaker 1: that's what they call eugenics, But now they're targeting pregnant
Speaker 1: women with all sorts of harmful back well, you know,
Speaker 1: injectable crucifixes, because they want a dumb down, dysgenic society.
Speaker 1: That's what their goal is. It's not eugenics at all.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: You know what's really interesting, I just want to throw
Speaker 4: this in real quick help slry Lisa, is that when
Speaker 4: me and lux are covering that book, we're only supposed
Speaker 4: to really be looking at one chapter. And I was like,
Speaker 4: I don't want to look at the other people in
Speaker 4: this book. You know that left you know that, you
Speaker 4: know whatever wherever they came from, and I saw looking
Speaker 4: them up and they're all very vocal about other things
Speaker 4: that they're into, and it's like, yo, if you were
Speaker 4: to look at eighty percent of the authors in this
Speaker 4: book and went on their ideas of sexuality, the fucking
Speaker 4: race would be extinct in a few fucking generations, right exactly,
Speaker 4: And like.
Speaker 2: What the fuck is up with that too? I just
Speaker 2: found it very weird.
Speaker 1: With people.
Speaker 3: If you spend quite a bit of time on cattle ranching,
Speaker 3: the eugenics or the breeding, you're looking for a docile race.
Speaker 3: You don't want to work with anybody or not anybody,
Speaker 3: any animal that is not going to follow the pack,
Speaker 3: that's not going to fill through the shoot, that is
Speaker 3: going to give you trouble. Because time is money. So
Speaker 3: whenever you bring in these cattle breeds that do well
Speaker 3: and drought, that do well and brush, you're going to
Speaker 3: breed out their fairalness or their their standaloneosness that you
Speaker 3: want file. So that's a lot of eugenics, is the
Speaker 3: dosatility of it, the domestication of it.
Speaker 5: If I'm not mistaken, I think it was Julian Huxley's
Speaker 5: specific brand of of eugenics, the brand that he kind
Speaker 5: of was in charge of rolling out or responsible going out,
Speaker 5: that really caught the Nazis eye. The actual Nazis because
Speaker 5: they were looking at our eugenics program and they were
Speaker 5: very influenced by it. They admired it even.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and those are progressives that are that are doing that.
Speaker 6: And so we've you know, the last article that we wrote,
Speaker 6: it shows that the progressives were really the first fascists too,
Speaker 6: and they they taught Mussolini. Mussolini took all of his
Speaker 6: information and Hitler too from these American progressives, namely Richard
Speaker 6: washer Burned Childs. He was the ambassador to Italy and
Speaker 6: he was a close personal friend of Mussolini and he
Speaker 6: was the editor of Mussolini's autobiography, and so they gave
Speaker 6: Mussolini the go ahead for his march on Rome. So
Speaker 6: you can see that, like everybody blames the Nazis for propaganda,
Speaker 6: while they actually got it from an American Jew, Edward
Speaker 6: Burnet's the father of propaganda, who was writing about this,
Speaker 6: you know, a generation prior to the Nazis. We're seeing
Speaker 6: the same things happening there. You know, they're blaming other
Speaker 6: people when it's actually the Americans and American progressive specifically
Speaker 6: that have invented you know, all of this propaganda fascism,
Speaker 6: you know, so they just try to cover it up.
Speaker 1: It's hard to ignore when you go to the Capitol
Speaker 1: Building in Washington, d C. All of the fasci that
Speaker 1: they have all over the place. And to get into
Speaker 1: the roots of the.
Speaker 4: State of Union, what's that whenever they do that state
Speaker 4: of the Union shit, Well, I forgot which place it is.
Speaker 2: Do they do certain kind of thing ones?
Speaker 6: Yeah, man, it's in the Washington Monument. There's a statue
Speaker 6: of George Washington with fascies inside that monument. There's also
Speaker 6: well there's fascies under each arm, each of Lincoln's arms
Speaker 6: at his memorial. So that's a that's a place where
Speaker 6: Americans flock to, right, and he's got fascies under both
Speaker 6: hands if you look, and there's probably at least a
Speaker 6: dozen other examples, including in the House of Representatives, there's
Speaker 6: two giant fascies on either side. And so it's it's
Speaker 6: really out there. I mean, we see it in the symbology.
Speaker 6: If you have respect for symbology in a soapian language,
Speaker 6: you can see it very clearly. But if you're asleep
Speaker 6: or you're a sheep, those I mean, I've heard people
Speaker 6: make excuses for why there's fascies in the House of Representatives.
Speaker 6: That are pretty ridiculous, especially when you see all of
Speaker 6: the other influences of fascism in America. And so let
Speaker 6: me just branch off here for a quick sec because
Speaker 6: this is a great spot to show you this book. Yeah,
Speaker 6: so the Principles of Scientific Management. Okay, you can get
Speaker 6: this book anything that's not sort of hasn't it's out
Speaker 6: of publish or you can get it at archive dot org.
Speaker 6: It's a great source. So this is Lewis brandeis coins
Speaker 6: the term scientific management. He actually controls the tailor society.
Speaker 6: Taylorism is one of the most influentialisms of the twentieth century.
Speaker 6: This is the scientific management of the workforce that turns
Speaker 6: into you know, all of these divisions of labor, the
Speaker 6: assembly line, and then into the administrative aspects of the thirties, forties, fifties,
Speaker 6: and into you know, mk ultra, the technocracy. All is
Speaker 6: born from this book right here. And not only that,
Speaker 6: but this book, like we were just talking about propaganda,
Speaker 6: was the influence for Stalin and then Trotsky now in
Speaker 6: the subjugation of their respective populations. This book right here,
Speaker 6: Frederick Winslow Taylor, And where was he supposed to go Harvard,
Speaker 6: but he decided not to because he'd stumbled on this technology.
Speaker 6: This is really one of the greatest discoveries of technology.
Speaker 6: Here the principles of scientific management, making man do what
Speaker 6: you want him to do. So this is when we
Speaker 6: look at Elon Musk and Doge the Department of Governmental Efficiency.
Speaker 6: He's really hearkening back to this right here, written nineteen
Speaker 6: eleven and then republished to the public in nineteen thirteen,
Speaker 6: and this is really the foundations of one of the
Speaker 6: main aspects of progressivism. Efficiency. So I found that incredibly
Speaker 6: enlightening when I saw the fascis sort of discreetly embossed
Speaker 6: on the cover of the Principles of Scientific Management.
Speaker 1: And I think it's important to note how the progressives
Speaker 1: have been tied to wars. They believe that wars are
Speaker 1: the best way to push forward their domestic policies because
Speaker 1: when everybody's focused on what's happening with their kids being deployed,
Speaker 1: being recruited, they can get away with a lot more
Speaker 1: tyrannical policies here at home, while everybody all the people
Speaker 1: who could resist or away at warfare, which is decidedly
Speaker 1: different from the ancient Greek form of eugenics, which was
Speaker 1: you go and you fight so that the best ones
Speaker 1: come back. If you've noticed all of the words, you know,
Speaker 1: half of our words come from Greek, and all the
Speaker 1: words having to do with military stuff also has to
Speaker 1: do with birth, like infantry, the naval forces. All of
Speaker 1: these words are all about birth because the warriors who
Speaker 1: come home from these battle campaigns, those are the ones
Speaker 1: who should be breeding the next generation. This is sort
Speaker 1: of the reverse of that. He can get our agenda
Speaker 1: through much easier when all of the people who could
Speaker 1: resist us are now you know, duet to fully obeying
Speaker 1: orders overseas.
Speaker 6: Yeah, Hegel said war's progress pieces stagnation. So really what
Speaker 6: we're seeing from all the way back to Lincoln and
Speaker 6: Ulysses s Grant is that war is good for business.
Speaker 6: So you know, those are really your first fascists if
Speaker 6: you want to really, you know, get serious. For the
Speaker 6: definition is Lincoln and Ulysses s Grant and all of
Speaker 6: these secretaries of war. And who was one of the
Speaker 6: first was the founder of Skull and Bones, Alfonso Taft.
Speaker 6: And so his son comes along, William Howard Taft, and
Speaker 6: he's he's a part of this nineteen twelve election, this
Speaker 6: famous Progressive Party year where all three were progressives. You
Speaker 6: look at the founding of progressivism in America, that's Theodore
Speaker 6: Roosevelt's bull Moose Party. So he's very much like a
Speaker 6: cult of personality like Mussolini. When you see him, he's
Speaker 6: waving his arms and he's you know, preaching Americanism, nationalism, patriotism,
Speaker 6: and preparedness, military preparedness. And that's that military aspect to
Speaker 6: our Western society, whether you're an American, Canadian or British.
Speaker 6: And there's people driving hummers around here now that are
Speaker 6: you know, basically the vehicle comes out of military, right.
Speaker 6: But you see soccer moms driving around hummers and all
Speaker 6: of these kinds of things now because we are just
Speaker 6: so immersed in that. And so here in Canada now
Speaker 6: Trump has got a Carnie looking to preparedness and starting
Speaker 6: to be more militarized here in Canada. And that's never
Speaker 6: really happened, I mean, especially in my lifetime. But in
Speaker 6: the last one hundred years you haven't seen that, but
Speaker 6: we're seeing it now. So the three tenants of progressivism, efficiency,
Speaker 6: preparedness and trust the science. That's all we see in
Speaker 6: our society right now.
Speaker 1: It should also be noted that in nineteen eighteen they
Speaker 1: banned speaking of German in the United States. So what
Speaker 1: they wanted to do is make sure that everybody who
Speaker 1: had a German ancestry and probably spoke German with their
Speaker 1: grandparents or other immigrants that had come over. We're not
Speaker 1: able to do so anymore. And I don't think they
Speaker 1: could really have a World War two without the deracinated
Speaker 1: German population of the United States, which makes up the
Speaker 1: entire red part of the United States. Like all that
Speaker 1: red part that is the German population. Well, if they
Speaker 1: don't know their roots, they're more likely to go over
Speaker 1: there and start killing, you know, their cousins. So you
Speaker 1: have to have this deracination of people from their roots
Speaker 1: and from their heritage for these progressive policies to really
Speaker 1: take root.
Speaker 4: You know, it's weird. I mean, I don't know a
Speaker 4: lot of other countries do it. It's centrals Germany. But
Speaker 4: if you really start looking at places in the United
Speaker 4: States that's actually named after places in Germany, it's fucking ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Yeah, real crazy.
Speaker 6: Yeah, we're deeply influenced by German culture. I think that
Speaker 6: that's what ultimately happened. Here we had American culture, or
Speaker 6: we were in the middle of developing it, but it
Speaker 6: was all hijacked and from our education system to sociology
Speaker 6: and the founding of social sciences, but also psychiatry, psychology,
Speaker 6: even our ideas of law. Is Lewis Brandeise changes that
Speaker 6: through sociological jurisprudence. He takes social science and this social
Speaker 6: activism and puts it into law. So now we argue
Speaker 6: cases not based on law, but based on stats, facts
Speaker 6: and data which could be manipulative. You can manipulate those
Speaker 6: in any way shape or form you on if you
Speaker 6: wanted to tell a story. So now you have liberal
Speaker 6: arts people telling you stories, great stories through the use
Speaker 6: of data, stats and facts. And that today still is
Speaker 6: looked at as the origins, and it's called the Brandeis Brief.
Speaker 6: To this day, they still use it. And he taught
Speaker 6: the ACLU, the NAACP in how to be radically, to
Speaker 6: radically reform society. He was there teaching all of them
Speaker 6: how to do it.
Speaker 1: One of the best out.
Speaker 5: Of this, all right, critical race comes out of this
Speaker 5: as well.
Speaker 1: Right, sure, critical race came out of the legal realm,
Speaker 1: and it transferred over into the rest of society. So
Speaker 1: these things do have a massive influence on the rest
Speaker 1: of everybody else, and they're being propped up by all
Speaker 1: of these elitists who think that they're better than you.
Speaker 1: But one of the ways that you could see the
Speaker 1: shift in social culture in the direction of this progressive
Speaker 1: idea is in the divorce law in this country. So
Speaker 1: women make up eighty three percent of the total consumption
Speaker 1: of society, so getting her to take all of the
Speaker 1: resources from him is like a stimulant for the economy
Speaker 1: because you wouldn't have so many frillly things being bought
Speaker 1: if it wasn't for these you know, really progressive divorce
Speaker 1: laws that basically look at men is less than people.
Speaker 1: So you've got this transforming of society based around these,
Speaker 1: you know, arcane beliefs in progressivism and how to stimulate
Speaker 1: the economy. What it's really just destroying lives left and right.
Speaker 6: Yeah, progress is regression.
Speaker 2: That is actually one thing Trump is tuting about that
Speaker 2: he will change as well. This is devoislows. He says
Speaker 2: that they are fucked up.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I like that if I could go back to something,
Speaker 5: I like how you're pointing out this strange fascination that
Speaker 5: the fascists had with war. It seems like they saw
Speaker 5: like a capitalistic advantage to war. It seems like Mussolini
Speaker 5: understood that, and like then you see Hitler come on
Speaker 5: the scene. Hitler was very fascinated with with Mussolini. He
Speaker 5: kind of adored Miscellini. They were friends, they spent a
Speaker 5: lot of time talking together. And Mussolini, you know, he's
Speaker 5: leading the charge of this this new kind of wave
Speaker 5: of fascism where they're including war. And then he's got
Speaker 5: this strange relationship with the church, the Catholic Church. Church
Speaker 5: kind of he had something worked out with the Catholics,
Speaker 5: Mussolini did, and in later as Hitler's coming into power,
Speaker 5: he works out a deal with the German Catholic Church.
Speaker 5: So I just find that that relationship very odd. That
Speaker 5: you've got the Catholics standing almost in silent solidarity or
Speaker 5: unison with the fascists. And I wonder if we took
Speaker 5: a page out of that book like Americans did, because
Speaker 5: of our sort of capitalistic fascist stuff happening here alongside
Speaker 5: of the Anglo Protestant Church that we've sort of propped
Speaker 5: up and chosen to be like our I don't know
Speaker 5: our facade to use that word again.
Speaker 1: Nick's covered here the Rotary Club, and the Rotary Club
Speaker 1: is so important when understanding religion and how it plays
Speaker 1: a role in society. This Rotary Club is made up
Speaker 1: of all of the leaders of these different faiths, and
Speaker 1: they rotate the different leadership classes within the Rotary Club
Speaker 1: to basically set policy for all of them. Nobody's looking
Speaker 1: at the Rotary Club. It's everywhere, and this is how
Speaker 1: they they communicate and get this stuff together.
Speaker 2: It's convenient. They all have boats.
Speaker 5: Been sleeping on the Rotary Club.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I know for real.
Speaker 4: Yeah, actually, you know, the CIA and Mormonism tied directly
Speaker 4: into it.
Speaker 2: Fucking wild.
Speaker 1: All of those, all of those signs that you see
Speaker 1: out out in front of small town America with the Freemasons,
Speaker 1: the Rotary Club, the Lines Club, all of those things
Speaker 1: have a purpose, and anybody trying to tell you that
Speaker 1: they don't have a purpose is line to your face.
Speaker 1: So what they're saying is this is who owns this place.
Speaker 1: You may think that the government is in control, but
Speaker 1: these guys are the actual owners of this system, so
Speaker 1: you better not cross them. That's the whole point of
Speaker 1: these signs is this is who owns this town. And
Speaker 1: if you look at the Freemasons, can you how when
Speaker 1: the Lodges took route or when the town first came,
Speaker 1: because they're synonymous. You know, what they would do is
Speaker 1: they would use these groups to found a city based
Speaker 1: off of, you know, their knowledge of law and all
Speaker 1: the rest of these things, and then basically they own
Speaker 1: it from that point onwards. Now there has been a
Speaker 1: huge decline, but they kind of want a big decline
Speaker 1: in the ownership class because that does necessarily take away
Speaker 1: autonomy from the individuals and keeps it in a much
Speaker 1: more centralized sort of location. So you had the Freemasons
Speaker 1: back in nineteen ten saying that they're going to you know,
Speaker 1: boost their you know, dues by like hundreds of percent
Speaker 1: because they were going to increase the doue rate. Back then,
Speaker 1: nobody liked that, and they all agreed at this fraternal
Speaker 1: conference that takes place at Washington, d C. That Yeah,
Speaker 1: I guess the Freemason's got it. So you have this
Speaker 1: massive decline of fraternal orders around the same time that
Speaker 1: they wanted to push everybody into this corporate medical stamp.
Speaker 1: So before that, during these uh during these times, when
Speaker 1: uh you were a member of these fraternal orders, you
Speaker 1: would have what they call lodge practice. So a doctor
Speaker 1: would be specifically assigned to a lodge and that doctor
Speaker 1: would service everybody in them, and he made a decent
Speaker 1: profit because you know.
Speaker 2: Too, right.
Speaker 1: And so instead of having that system which empowered individuals
Speaker 1: and kept costs low, the Freemasons and everybody else decided
Speaker 1: they were going to get rid of lodge practice. The
Speaker 1: AMA was a big part of this too, and then
Speaker 1: transfer everybody over into this for profit hospital system. And
Speaker 1: that was a big step in their progressive direction. Because
Speaker 1: once you have direct control, centralizing all of medical authority
Speaker 1: under these you know uh Masonic type doctors and leaders
Speaker 1: can can be will really escape from that. We're living
Speaker 1: in matrix after matrix here.
Speaker 4: You know what's really interesting you saying this is that
Speaker 4: now I don't know if people would even notice this
Speaker 4: or even think much about it. I just did because,
Speaker 4: like somebody that was in my life at the time,
Speaker 4: dealt with hospitals a lot. But like around COVID, so
Speaker 4: many hospitals were fucking glombing up private practices and now they.
Speaker 2: All have to adopt their shit.
Speaker 4: It was fucking wild how that started spreading like wildfire
Speaker 4: around that mont.
Speaker 1: With lodge practice. Right with lodge practice, these these doctors
Speaker 1: that would service these lodges would have reserved rooms inside
Speaker 1: the hospital so if anything got, you know, too far
Speaker 1: out of hand, they could take their patients directly to
Speaker 1: the hospital and then pay a nominal fee to make
Speaker 1: sure that, you know, they're cured in a decent way. Well, again,
Speaker 1: people start moving away from this, you know, hospitalized system.
Speaker 1: They start having private practices where they can know not
Speaker 1: charge people these exorbitant insurance rates. And now you've got
Speaker 1: to reintegrate them. So you've got to have these resets
Speaker 1: over and over again to keep people in the systems
Speaker 1: of control that they've already established.
Speaker 6: Yeah, going back to your point on Freemasons in their
Speaker 6: control of our society. In Brandeis part six the Science
Speaker 6: of Law, we talk about Nathan Rossoll Pound, which was
Speaker 6: he's a close personal friend of Brandeis. He's considered a progressive.
Speaker 6: He's Harvard Law School dean during these years, but he's
Speaker 6: also the grand master of the Freemason lodge there in Massachusetts.
Speaker 6: Now I have the history of Freemasonry here in a
Speaker 6: six volume set, and it said that that lodge of
Speaker 6: Massachusetts is the most influential in the Western hemisphere. So
Speaker 6: you have the dean of Harvard Law School establishing sociological jurisprudence.
Speaker 6: He's a Freemason. He's doing lectures on Masonic jurisprudence at
Speaker 6: this time, so you can see that they're actually establishing
Speaker 6: the idea is of Masonry in our systems of law.
Speaker 6: And it's they're all Phi beta kappa. Every single person
Speaker 6: here involved is Phi beta kapa. So that's graduating with
Speaker 6: honors top of class either magna cum laude, kum laude,
Speaker 6: or summa cum laude. So they're corralling the greatest minds
Speaker 6: through Phi beta Kappa and establishing all of this ship
Speaker 6: through through this power that they've established through the William
Speaker 6: and Mary College.
Speaker 2: Who is that guy's name you just mentioned before something Pound.
Speaker 2: This a guy's listening Pound.
Speaker 6: Nathan Rosscoll Pound. Now he was the dean of Harvard
Speaker 6: Law School and the Grand Masters that the term that
Speaker 6: they use for the Freemasons. But he's the head of
Speaker 6: the most influential lodge in the Western Hemisphere and the
Speaker 6: dean of Harvard Law School at the same time. This
Speaker 6: is where they established social sciences because the first PhDs
Speaker 6: that we had here in America work from here. It's
Speaker 6: a German Prussian system. So our education founders went there
Speaker 6: and they were only allowed to go there to learn
Speaker 6: these deeper concepts once they had established a knowledge of
Speaker 6: master of arts. This is why they all went to
Speaker 6: college or the state colleges first that were teaching all this.
Speaker 6: Then they traveled to Prussia, and then they came back
Speaker 6: over after adopting those ideas and established it in the West.
Speaker 6: And that's social sciences. But that's k through twelve through
Speaker 6: this PhD system and what is that? But you know
Speaker 6: the scientific technical expert. And so if I can take
Speaker 6: this back to Phi Beta Kapa just.
Speaker 4: Quickly, something I just want to add real quick before
Speaker 4: I forget about it here. This is like a weird
Speaker 4: connection ahead of my head. You know, we're talking about
Speaker 4: like even MK ulture earlier. And one time I know
Speaker 4: how I came across it. Oh, I was covering the
Speaker 4: mk ultra actually with Thrish and I was looking at
Speaker 4: hospitals that were associated with mk ultra and at one
Speaker 4: point I had noticed this guy Ezra Pound somehow ended
Speaker 4: up in the same hospital considered crazy for like eight years,
Speaker 4: but that hospital was also running MK ultra shit.
Speaker 2: So I just like I had always wondered.
Speaker 4: Was there some sort of connection, And you're saying that,
Speaker 4: I know, it's like, could be fucking who knows, it
Speaker 4: could be a you know, it's not even correct, but
Speaker 4: I'm wondering if there's a relation to this pound their
Speaker 4: same pound.
Speaker 6: They're most certainly I don't know if there is between
Speaker 6: the two pounds, but there most certainly is with the
Speaker 6: because he's establishing literature, he's writing things, So this goes
Speaker 6: through our entire culture. Jane Austen and a lot of
Speaker 6: these female progressives that were all about women's suffrage, they're
Speaker 6: all writing things in the same vein that they want
Speaker 6: us all to be leftist and they're exploiting us through
Speaker 6: our liberal sentimentality. So yeah, Ezra Pound is really part
Speaker 6: of the same thing. I mean, when you really step back,
Speaker 6: anybody that's famous or well known our world today is
Speaker 6: really and that includes Tom Morello right now from Rage
Speaker 6: Against the Machine and what he's doing, they're all still
Speaker 6: pushing the same radical progressive bullshit.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and just like real quickly, like if you even
Speaker 4: look at kind of what the story with this guy,
Speaker 4: Ezra Pound. You see that like the country, the United
Speaker 4: States like deems him like saying that he's saying like
Speaker 4: radical shit.
Speaker 2: You gotta you know, you gotta lock.
Speaker 4: Him up, and then they allow him to be deemed
Speaker 4: crazy and then they put him into a hospital that's
Speaker 4: running in kulture.
Speaker 2: Shit. It just seems too fucking convenient for me.
Speaker 6: Yeah, yeah, I don't know if they're related, but he's
Speaker 6: definitely involved in this.
Speaker 1: What they It hasn't been the easiest of transitions, and
Speaker 1: I think the last real hurrah of resistance to the
Speaker 1: progressive movement was in the eighteen twenties with the Anti
Speaker 1: Masonic Party. And even though the Airtime Masonic Party was
Speaker 1: headed up by one of these guys that switched allegiances,
Speaker 1: they were all still members of the Society of the Cincinnati,
Speaker 1: which is another big uh you know tell that you know,
Speaker 1: really doesn't get a lot of attention on any of
Speaker 1: these anti progressive channels. But the you know, the Society
Speaker 1: of the Cincinnati is all the European blue bloods that
Speaker 1: ended up taking over the United States because these were
Speaker 1: the officers during the Revolutionary War and they kept their
Speaker 1: sort of mission and their and their corporate agenda all
Speaker 1: throughout that time. And you can look at the Civil
Speaker 1: War as being a battle between factions of the Society
Speaker 1: of the Cincinnati, you know.
Speaker 5: And so can I point out. I was on a
Speaker 5: show with Nick and JJ and we figured out on
Speaker 5: the show that the headquarters for the Society of Cincinnati
Speaker 5: sat directly across the street from the Cosmos Club.
Speaker 6: In Washington, d C. Right, And actually I got a map, right,
Speaker 6: So it's a weird area over there.
Speaker 2: When I filmed it, I was like, there's some weird
Speaker 2: shit over here.
Speaker 5: Altogether, It's like this is like it's a it's like
Speaker 5: a power hub for Western civilization. They're running shit.
Speaker 1: Out of there, right, And I want to realize these
Speaker 1: names haven't been said because your alt media is controlled.
Speaker 1: They're not doing the type of research that it takes
Speaker 1: to actually free yourself from this stuff, because they're not
Speaker 1: talking about these institutions that have established themselves as the
Speaker 1: ultimate expert authority on everything in your lives.
Speaker 6: Right, And so I just had this map. I just
Speaker 6: happened to have this map. This morning. We were talking
Speaker 6: about buildings in Washington seventeen twenty seven, nineteenth Street. Here
Speaker 6: is the host of Truth. This is the political slan
Speaker 6: in which they altered the definition of liberalism. We can
Speaker 6: get into that. Here's the Phi Beta Kappa society. Just
Speaker 6: like I'll take your dog for a walk, you'll be
Speaker 6: able to go between the two. And then I think
Speaker 6: this is, uh, this has to do with the Society
Speaker 6: of Cincinnatus. I believe this building. Can't remember what it
Speaker 6: is now. I was just doing this research this morning.
Speaker 2: But yeah, yeah, that's all.
Speaker 6: They're all with Missus DuPont Circle. So they're all within
Speaker 6: you know, a ten minute walk of each other. And
Speaker 6: then these are all within a mile of the White
Speaker 6: House and the other organizations like the Carnegie Endowment and
Speaker 6: all of these others. So see that they're all strategically
Speaker 6: placed in and around Washington.
Speaker 4: Yeah, there was so many places I went to in
Speaker 4: Washington like weird fucking occult buildings or like societies, scientology
Speaker 4: has a bunch of places out there. You got over
Speaker 4: on Hubbard's spot out that's fucking just weird. It's like
Speaker 4: why are these all around here? Like like when you
Speaker 4: saw looking at that, you have to sell being like,
Speaker 4: who's really fucking charge of Washington?
Speaker 2: On here.
Speaker 1: The Mormon Temple is right outside of the Beltway because
Speaker 1: within the Beltway you could only get up to as
Speaker 1: tall as the Washington Monument five hundred and fifty feet.
Speaker 1: They decided that they wanted to be the tallest building
Speaker 1: in Washington, so they built it right outside the Beltway
Speaker 1: and made it even more massive than the Washington Monument
Speaker 1: because that's what they were going for. That's that's the
Speaker 1: idea that was the pickover.
Speaker 3: If I made the Nathan Roscoe Pound is cousins with
Speaker 3: Ezra Pound article in the Chat and just viewers the Pound,
Speaker 3: it was very influential to Peter Teel and all of
Speaker 3: his tenants that he has found.
Speaker 6: Yeah, pallunteer and all of that. That all starts in
Speaker 6: the idea of the of human progress.
Speaker 1: And it's so important to look at Peter Teel starting
Speaker 1: to I guess, kidnap or or take these promising young
Speaker 1: individuals outside of the college system and put them into
Speaker 1: his system, because what.
Speaker 3: He definitely says that people should not be educated and
Speaker 3: just start your own thing.
Speaker 1: Right, because what he knows is that if you if
Speaker 1: you put all these promising people through the meat grinder,
Speaker 1: they're going to come out on the other side worthless,
Speaker 1: So he wants them to work instead of actually, you know,
Speaker 1: doing all the feminist studies and all the rest of
Speaker 1: the crap that really screws up your mind. And basically
Speaker 1: he's the only outlet into the elites that now can
Speaker 1: exist because he's the only one doing this sort of
Speaker 1: outside academia with still having the authority of his name
Speaker 1: attached to it.
Speaker 3: So this guy's but he has the Teal College. So
Speaker 3: it's almost like, don't believe in Jesus, but I'm Jesus
Speaker 3: ex the same thing. It's the same thing.
Speaker 6: Yeah, he's religion of no religion.
Speaker 1: That sh he's pushing Christianity hardcore out in California.
Speaker 6: Okay, let me show you guys. Let me show you
Speaker 6: this technique of America. So this is musks. Can you
Speaker 6: see that orange North America? Basically, yeah, you guys can
Speaker 6: see that.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 6: Well, this is the map that was driven drawn up
Speaker 6: by the technocracy, and it's called the Technaque of America. Now,
Speaker 6: when I look at that ownership of Greenland, Canada is
Speaker 6: a fifty first state ownership of Panama Canal, renaming the
Speaker 6: gulp of Mexico. All of a sudden starts to make
Speaker 6: a lot of sense.
Speaker 4: Yep is despably like part of the Heritage Foundation fucking movement.
Speaker 6: Too, could be now, the fact that Trump, you know,
Speaker 6: talked about manifest destiny during his inauguration speech was very important.
Speaker 6: The fact that he removed the resolute desk also very important.
Speaker 6: The fact that he's actually inciting the Monroe doctrine, which
Speaker 6: is basically, you know, telling this the rest of the colonialists,
Speaker 6: the Spaniards, the Portuguese, the Dutch, the British, to stay
Speaker 6: out of the West, leave us to control you know,
Speaker 6: Central and Southern America and just make you know, the
Speaker 6: two Americas or the three Americas all one. And I
Speaker 6: you know, this map stops short at Columbia and Venezuela.
Speaker 6: But I would say that their their overall plan would
Speaker 6: be to take the whole continent of South America as well.
Speaker 3: Well haven't they already through the CIA.
Speaker 5: Yeah, sure, I've had our CIA has has had implants
Speaker 5: down there for years. And this goes back to even
Speaker 5: the time of Edward Barnes. I think his name was
Speaker 5: brought up sure at the Eisenhower ears. And when you
Speaker 5: see this alliance between Eisenhower the dullest brothers and burns.
Speaker 5: And what they're doing is they're sending spooks down to
Speaker 5: South America and overthrow it, like the like the Guatemalan
Speaker 5: coup of nineteen fifty three or war that was. Yeah,
Speaker 5: we've had our people down there. They're running what do
Speaker 5: they call it. It's like they did with Iran back
Speaker 5: in the day. They put they put a CIA guy
Speaker 5: or a.
Speaker 6: Yeah man.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, Well.
Speaker 1: With General Smedley Darlington Butler and any book War as
Speaker 1: a Rocket. It's a very short pamphlet. It was the
Speaker 1: beach that he made all over the place where he
Speaker 1: was talking about being a general for industry, all around
Speaker 1: these plaations, governments for corporations. It's really a long time.
Speaker 6: And you know, since before we could even fly. I've
Speaker 6: got a map that was given to the American Geographical
Speaker 6: Society from Standard Oil that shows South America and all
Speaker 6: the different languages and different tribes that are down there,
Speaker 6: and all of these people that lived down there had
Speaker 6: never seen a white man. So they were dropping bombs
Speaker 6: and fire bombs and doing all kinds of incredibly disgusting
Speaker 6: things to these people to get access to their rubber
Speaker 6: and whatever natural resources they were doing. So this goes back,
Speaker 6: you know, hundreds of years.
Speaker 1: He currently because we've got the miners with jetpacks. Story
Speaker 1: now coming out of Paraguay, where you've got these indigenous
Speaker 1: tribes having these encounters with people in these weird suits.
Speaker 1: They call them the face peelers, and they do this
Speaker 1: odd thing where they kidnap people and they start, you know,
Speaker 1: butchering them up, and it's like, what the hell is
Speaker 1: going on? Well, when the face peelers were down there,
Speaker 1: through our research, we found that this was the one
Speaker 1: training exercise that the Space Force had ever done, and
Speaker 1: it was in South America at the exact same time
Speaker 1: as these face peelers. So they're using all of this
Speaker 1: stuff to sort of cover up the technological angles and
Speaker 1: see what they can get away with down in these
Speaker 1: remote parts of the Amazon. Because they've got technology that
Speaker 1: we have no clue about, and they're keeping it hidden
Speaker 1: because maybe they can use it on us. That's the
Speaker 1: only reason I can think of why they're keeping all
Speaker 1: this technology hashash. That could be what the disclosure movement is.
Speaker 5: There's a Space Force base up the top of Greenland
Speaker 5: in North Greenland that we took from the Nazis. It
Speaker 5: was called full Air Base. And I see, you know,
Speaker 5: going back to that map you showed and talking about
Speaker 5: you know, Trump's been talking about taking Greenland again. I
Speaker 5: think there's it has something to do probably with our
Speaker 5: Space Force activities up there, and I think that they
Speaker 5: want to remilitarize Greenland like Bird was talking about back
Speaker 5: in the fifties, because if you militarize that land mass,
Speaker 5: you can antarctica it and keep the public out forever
Speaker 5: and do all your secret space stuff up there with
Speaker 5: your kind a curtain.
Speaker 2: You know what.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So much of the Russian economy is under the
Speaker 1: ice in the northern part of the world. So him
Speaker 1: taking Greenland and trying to control the Earth from the
Speaker 1: northern north Pole is a strategic thing. It has nothing
Speaker 1: to do with liberating Greenland from No personally.
Speaker 6: No in Northwest passage is something they've been trying to
Speaker 6: achieve forever to that was part of the original Manifest
Speaker 6: Destiny right now. That goes back to Lincoln. Lincoln actually
Speaker 6: was working with the Russians and trying to create this
Speaker 6: cosmopolitan railway, this one rail that goes around the world,
Speaker 6: and the Bearing Sea was a key aspect where I
Speaker 6: live here in British Columbia. We were owned both by
Speaker 6: the British and the Americans for about a decade, and
Speaker 6: this area, this territory was key for that that idea
Speaker 6: of having a cosmopolitan around the world railway, and Woodrow
Speaker 6: Wilson reinvigorated that all too, but sent the military over.
Speaker 6: The US military helped in establishing the Siberian Railway and
Speaker 6: getting it as far over to the Baring Sea as
Speaker 6: they could. And so there's this underlying relationship that that
Speaker 6: very few know. Especially if you're sitting there arguing Democrat
Speaker 6: Republican and you're you're talking about Russia and Putin and
Speaker 6: all of this stuff that the mainstream purports. You're so
Speaker 6: far away from understanding that geography is the most important
Speaker 6: and it's all economic. It has nothing to do with
Speaker 6: the liberation of backwards races or any of that.
Speaker 3: The British in that if this whole pull shift is real,
Speaker 3: or it happens green Land and is prime real estate,
Speaker 3: because in Canada is too, and so was Russia.
Speaker 4: That's interesting, head list. I just wanted to ask you
Speaker 4: a question, actually real quick. Sorry, so I did interrupt you,
Speaker 4: but I did want to ask you something before we
Speaker 4: go to something else. You said, face peelers. Were these
Speaker 4: people being meant to believe that there was like people
Speaker 4: getting their faces peeled though, No, there.
Speaker 1: They were attacking people and trying.
Speaker 5: On the beach. There were people found on the beach
Speaker 5: with their face perfectly.
Speaker 2: Yeah, just for some reason.
Speaker 4: Maybe it's totally different context, but it just started making
Speaker 4: me think of Henry Lansdale. How we had people convinced
Speaker 4: that there was people actually taking Filipino people and sucking
Speaker 4: their blood and staying stringing them up in the trees.
Speaker 4: And it was just like them taking dead bodies and
Speaker 4: hanging it up in the trees. And then they had
Speaker 4: like helicopters like saying shit and like weird voices, and
Speaker 4: they had people believing.
Speaker 2: That ghosts were threatening them.
Speaker 4: So, I mean, I'm just saying like, for some reason,
Speaker 4: I was like, oh, is this one of those bullshit
Speaker 4: sigh ups again?
Speaker 2: But I guess I didn't understand the context of the story.
Speaker 1: It's the same ideas what they did in Vietnam when
Speaker 1: they're when they're telling everybody the vampires are gonna get you. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you've got to shock the local population into a state
Speaker 1: of abject fear right, so that they're not willing to
Speaker 1: come up to your to your sites anymore. And the
Speaker 1: whole weird thing about the the mining operations down there
Speaker 1: that they were supposedly doing is how the the normal
Speaker 1: miners will do uh, river mining is by dropping a
Speaker 1: bunch of liquid mercury into the waters, killing everything in
Speaker 1: the waters, but it starts to amalgamate with all of
Speaker 1: the minerals that are inside the water. So these you
Speaker 1: know miners will you know, kill off entire rivers just
Speaker 1: to scoop up some of the ore out of these rivers.
Speaker 1: That's what the idea of why they called them miners
Speaker 1: is because there had been this problem of these you know,
Speaker 1: uh basically poachers going out there and trying to steal
Speaker 1: all this or from these rivers. There's no indication whatsoever
Speaker 1: that they've been doing those operations up there, but it
Speaker 1: does seem like a psychological operation that they're trying to
Speaker 1: pull off. And so even the idea of these Peruvian
Speaker 1: miners is kind of a syop in itself. They just
Speaker 1: made that up.
Speaker 5: But I think there's natives were talking about coverboards like
Speaker 5: green goblin stuff like these guys were like advanced technology
Speaker 5: breakaway civilizations stuff. And I mean, you know you said
Speaker 5: you did an investigation where it points to there was
Speaker 5: a Space Force operation. That's interesting there was a Space
Speaker 5: Force operation happening at the same time that or because
Speaker 5: I always thought about the breakaway civilization theme, because we
Speaker 5: know the Nazis made it down there, many of them did,
Speaker 5: made it to Argentina and everywhere else, and a lot
Speaker 5: of them had money, like big money, and they were
Speaker 5: able to continue their black funds, black budget projects under
Speaker 5: Wan Puran. So I was like, is this a Nazi thing,
Speaker 5: this is a Fourth Right thing going on or what?
Speaker 1: Well, I think it has something to do with that.
Speaker 1: If you look at the Space Force's goals, they want
Speaker 1: total uh electronic control over the entire planet. That's what
Speaker 1: the that's what the real goals are.
Speaker 2: To look into them.
Speaker 1: Yeah, now touching the Pentagon. Those just not administration.
Speaker 3: What's interesting is the majority of the manufactured equipment or
Speaker 3: aeronautics comes out of Utah. You have a lot of
Speaker 3: Mormons in South America.
Speaker 5: Must keep must keeps all his stuff on a Space
Speaker 5: Force base, all his uh SpaceX stuff. He's allowed to store.
Speaker 3: It doesn't go anywhere. It just like goes up to
Speaker 3: the ferment and bounces back down and then occasionally lands.
Speaker 1: Yeah, man, I think I think there's so many different
Speaker 1: pieces that are starting to line up. And if people
Speaker 1: start to get serious about understanding the true roots progressivism,
Speaker 1: don't understand that it's a project that's been going on
Speaker 1: for thousands of years. The same things that Plato wrote
Speaker 1: about in his book The Republic have been focused on
Speaker 1: heavily by the elites all this time. And that's sort
Speaker 1: of where you get the idea of the new Atlantis
Speaker 1: in America coming from Francis Bacon. And then you've got
Speaker 1: Manly P. Hall talking about the secret destiny of America,
Speaker 1: and all of these things are linked to these secret
Speaker 1: societies and how they've been changed and coerced, like for instance,
Speaker 1: Johannes Kelpius, the one that you brought up earlier, he
Speaker 1: became like the founder of resecrutionism in the United States.
Speaker 1: And then later on during the progressive era, the rosicrutions
Speaker 1: were out there pushing abortion on all seven continents. They
Speaker 1: had people, well not Antarctica, they had people that were
Speaker 1: associated with the resecrutions, including the big abortion proponent what's
Speaker 1: her name in America. She was Irish, I don't know,
Speaker 1: I always blank on her name, but she was a
Speaker 1: resecrution She got converted and the head of the ro
Speaker 1: Secrutionism at that time was also the head of the
Speaker 1: Wolf and Chief's Clothing organization.
Speaker 6: Why do I always Fabian Society.
Speaker 1: The Fabian Society. So the Fabian Societies were integral with
Speaker 1: rose Acruciism and pushing abortion. Now, how in the hell
Speaker 1: does that match up with Martin Luther's vision because they
Speaker 1: shared the same seal.
Speaker 5: Right, I would argue that there's a strong rosic Christian
Speaker 5: undercurrent to this new UFO disclosure movement as well.
Speaker 6: And it's Beatrice Web, founder of the Fabian Society, that
Speaker 6: coins the term collective bargaining, which is the heart of
Speaker 6: trade unionism. And so Lewis Brandeis establishes all these working
Speaker 6: hours and everything, and it's all based off of the
Speaker 6: Fabian book Industrial Democracy that Sydney and Beatrice Web wrote,
Speaker 6: and it's talking about a centralized government and a society
Speaker 6: government by the scientific elite. And so Fabianism is an
Speaker 6: incredibly important part of all of this. And this is
Speaker 6: really where that the idea, you know, the American progressives
Speaker 6: borrow all of that because Walter Littman, the father of
Speaker 6: modern journalism, founding Progressive, is close personal friends with Graham Wallace,
Speaker 6: who's a founder of the Fabian Society. Graham Wallace writes
Speaker 6: the book The Great Society and dedicates it to Walter Littman.
Speaker 6: When Walter Littman travels to Britain or when Graham Wallace
Speaker 6: travels to America, they stay together. They stay at each
Speaker 6: other's house, so they're very close personal friends. They're separated
Speaker 6: probably by thirty years. It's more like a father son relationship.
Speaker 6: But the Great Society is really what establishes American progressivism.
Speaker 6: We see LBJ after JFK dies, he takes on that
Speaker 6: as a presidential slogan, the Great Society. So I want
Speaker 6: to take you guys here just for a quick sec
Speaker 6: because this gives a great sort of overall idea of
Speaker 6: where what progressivism is. Okay, because it involves are the
Speaker 6: founders of liberalism. This is something that I just kind
Speaker 6: of figured out, and maybe you guys were ahead of
Speaker 6: me on this, but just as a general ideology, progressivism
Speaker 6: is a left leaning political philosophy and reform movement that
Speaker 6: seeks to advance the human condition through social reform. So
Speaker 6: we're talking about the social contract. I've established Lewis brandeis
Speaker 6: as really the maker of our modern day social contract.
Speaker 6: And so where does the idea of the social contract start?
Speaker 6: But with the Enlightenment thinkers guys like this right here,
Speaker 6: John Stuart Mill and if you read the Fabian Freeway,
Speaker 6: they're just taking the same ideas as John Stuart Mill
Speaker 6: had and creating an ethical socialism. You know, he Compty
Speaker 6: and all of these guys are traveling in this same
Speaker 6: circles with the utopian socialists of the revolutionary Wars and
Speaker 6: what was going on in Europe. So you can see that.
Speaker 6: And I've actually got a quote from his book here
Speaker 6: if I can find it, where he talks about needing
Speaker 6: everybody to be progressive. So did it? Can you see
Speaker 6: that there's a yellow book here now on the screen?
Speaker 2: No, it's kind of stuck on the oka.
Speaker 6: Oh okay, let me try this again, because this is
Speaker 6: critical right here for everybody to understand. Just give me
Speaker 6: a minute.
Speaker 2: Yea, Sometimes switching sites can get a little annoying.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I was hoping with Margaret is the one who
Speaker 7: converted to re secrutionism in nineteen fifteen, and so the
Speaker 7: head of the ro Secutions at that time was also
Speaker 7: the head of the Fabian Society, and he spread through
Speaker 7: abortionism all over the planet using go cookie cutter women
Speaker 7: everywhere he went.
Speaker 6: So here on on liberty. So John Stuart Mill, if
Speaker 6: you guys aren't familiar, he's really looked at as a
Speaker 6: founder of liberalism here in the West, Okay, And so
Speaker 6: here he talks about two parties being am I on
Speaker 6: the right, page eighty five. Right there, there's where I
Speaker 6: want to be. See if I can get that a
Speaker 6: little bit closer. So in politics again it is almost
Speaker 6: a commonplace. He writes that a party of order or
Speaker 6: stability and a party of progress or reform are both
Speaker 6: necessary elements of a healthy state of political life until
Speaker 6: the one or the other shell have so enlarged its
Speaker 6: mental grasp as to be a party equally of order
Speaker 6: and of progress, knowing and distinguishing what is fit to
Speaker 6: be preserved from what ought to be swept away. Okay,
Speaker 6: we were talking about all of that earlier. So he's
Speaker 6: states in here that he wants everybody to be progressive.
Speaker 6: So one one party of order, one order, A Party
Speaker 6: of Progress and they fight under hostile banners is the
Speaker 6: actual wording that he uses for this left leaning progressive
Speaker 6: I guess you call it a party, but it's not really.
Speaker 6: It's this underlying, unseen, unheard aspect that's infiltrated our media
Speaker 6: and both parties. This is what it is. This is
Speaker 6: you know, what color do you get when your next
Speaker 6: blue and red? But purple? And that is the purple.
Speaker 6: That's the color of their flag. And you know, we're
Speaker 6: seeing sort of color revolutions going on, and the choice
Speaker 6: of color that they use often is purple.
Speaker 1: So purple, huh Kaite Phoenisian color.
Speaker 6: Huh right exactly. This is what other people have been
Speaker 6: pointing out to me that that's and it's a royal
Speaker 6: color to Yeah, this is how they got rich.
Speaker 1: They sold directly to the royals and they cut out
Speaker 1: anybody else who couldn't afford it. So the Canaanite Phoenicians
Speaker 1: back then were one of the wealthiest societies, if not
Speaker 1: the wealthiest society, out of everything. And suddenly we're just
Speaker 1: supposed to assume that they went away. I think after
Speaker 1: the Punic Wars, they integrated themselves inside of these Elucidian
Speaker 1: style mystery schools, and they maintain their empire through this
Speaker 1: type of progressivism, these you know, policies that only favor
Speaker 1: the elites, only favor the bankers. These Canaanite Phoenicians were
Speaker 1: the ones sailing all across the world. They were a
Speaker 1: sailing empire. And you've got Law of the Ocean, you know,
Speaker 1: Law the Sea, which is directly related to these Canaanite Phoenicians.
Speaker 1: All of these corporations directly related to the Canaknite Phoenicians.
Speaker 1: And yet you know they've got the purple flag for
Speaker 1: Fox's sake.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And so he.
Speaker 6: States, I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all
Speaker 6: ethical questions, but it must be utility in the largest sense,
Speaker 6: grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being.
Speaker 6: This is where it all sort of gets established. And
Speaker 6: when he's talking utility, he's talking Jeremy Bentham. And Jeremy
Speaker 6: Bentham's the creator of the Panopticon, right, the most efficient
Speaker 6: penitentiary you could ever have, where all of the inmates
Speaker 6: are able to be seen by one security guard. So
Speaker 6: he's and this is where the greater good comes from.
Speaker 6: We heard that during COVID that you know, you've got
Speaker 6: to be for the greater good. You can't have an
Speaker 6: opinion here, So see utility progress being very much a
Speaker 6: part of our society today.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, well, I hope everybody's been taken notes. I think
Speaker 1: this is probably the place to break off. Definitely want
Speaker 1: to explore this more progressively. Progressivism is the unstated thing.
Speaker 1: It's like when they talk about the progressive era, they
Speaker 1: never give you a date for when it ended. Right,
Speaker 1: when did the res of era? And or are we
Speaker 1: still living in it? The idea of the experts as
Speaker 1: this class above everybody else hasn't gone anywhere.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 5: I think it's funny. On one of those last Wikipedia
Speaker 5: pages you have pulled up, it said from the Enlightenment
Speaker 5: to the Industrial Revolution. Yes, and I think that we've
Speaker 5: filled in the gaps big time with that.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 6: And that's so that's efficiency, that's the efficiency of government,
Speaker 6: but it's also efficiency of the worker, efficiency of society. Right,
Speaker 6: how much time do we have?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 4: Yeah, we got to unfortunately because too Yeah, okay.
Speaker 2: We can definitely, we can definitely continue this for sure.
Speaker 6: There was much to go through here as far as
Speaker 6: the history. We can get into the enlightened absolutists and cameralism,
Speaker 6: the adoption of the scientific like a group of scientists
Speaker 6: that surround the president. So we see that FDR's brain trust,
Speaker 6: and who's involved there but Lewis Brandeis, Felix, Frankfurter, Walter Litman,
Speaker 6: the same progressives, the same founders of all of this
Speaker 6: strife that we see, and they're behind the New Deal.
Speaker 6: And so the third Rail by George Clinton William blythe
Speaker 6: the third is his real name. That third Rail is
Speaker 6: also progressive when you look at it. It's just under
Speaker 6: different names throughout throughout this last one hundred years. But
Speaker 6: there's a total ominous continuity to all of it, and
Speaker 6: you can you can see it through their language especially,
Speaker 6: and you can still see it today through Musk and
Speaker 6: the efficiency movement and now this move towards preparedness and
Speaker 6: obviously this overarching idea of science governing society.
Speaker 1: Absolutely well, this has been another episode of the occult
Speaker 1: rejects talking about the trivium, quadrivium and progressivism. So Lisa,
Speaker 1: go ahead and tell them where they can find you,
Speaker 1: and then we'll go around the room and talk more.
Speaker 3: Sure you can find me on ax at to Lace, Lisa,
Speaker 3: and more importantly Eficult Research Institute dot org. Thank you.
Speaker 3: This has been a great pleasure. I've learned so much,
Speaker 3: taken so many notes doing your well of information. So
Speaker 3: thank you very much for the discussion. Thank you fellow rejecks,
Speaker 3: and thank you for inviting me on.
Speaker 1: Thick.
Speaker 2: Yeah, thank you very much. Man. I'm really really happy
Speaker 2: we got you on the show. That was an awesome talk.
Speaker 2: I would definitely love to continue this. It was great stuff.
Speaker 2: Like you said, it really for me. I could see
Speaker 2: how you were saying.
Speaker 4: It connected to a lot of things that the show
Speaker 4: has covered recently, even though I say in the last
Speaker 4: year there was connections that are popping over my head.
Speaker 4: So this was awesome, man. I really appreciate it. Thank you,
Speaker 4: thank you.
Speaker 6: Yeah, cool, I appreciate it. We didn't even get to
Speaker 6: the connections with Cincinnatis and William of Orange and all
Speaker 6: of those things. This is really profound. So yeah, I
Speaker 6: appreciate you having me on. I appreciate the time to
Speaker 6: be here to explain some are these deeper concepts and
Speaker 6: you can find me at the History of Propaganda presently
Speaker 6: on YouTube.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much.
Speaker 5: Gohad too, Tim Constantine. My show was sixth Censory Podcasts.
Speaker 5: I'm on Spotify, Apple, YouTube, Patreon, and Instagram. This was
Speaker 5: thanks Nick for having me, Thanks to all the other rejects.
Speaker 5: It's always a pleasure to be here. And Dwayne really
Speaker 5: good stuff today.
Speaker 2: Man.
Speaker 6: Thanks for your interest in our work and all of
Speaker 6: that too, Tim, I appreciate that very much.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, and you can find me at the Headless Giant
Speaker 1: at gmail dot com. If you have any stories about
Speaker 1: Headless Giant podcasts at gmail dot com. If you have
Speaker 1: any stories about creepy maul dreams, I know I've had
Speaker 1: a few myself, but if you've got any stories about that,
Speaker 1: send them to me, because I think there's something strange
Speaker 1: happening with those with those type of post apocalyptic mall dreams.
Speaker 1: So well, that's it. Tune in again next time and
Speaker 1: we'll see you later.
Speaker 2: Lada