Speaker 1: Good evening everybody, and welcome to another edition of The
Speaker 1: Cajun Night Live. I am your host, Kate Jacob Mouk
Speaker 1: the Cajun Night and Uh, I'm gonna be honest with you.
Speaker 1: There's a lot going on in the news right now
Speaker 1: as far as Epstein is concerned, and there's a few
Speaker 1: things we're gonna be talking about here on this evening
Speaker 1: so podcast, But honestly, there's a few things outside of
Speaker 1: the Epstein realm and that's that's kind of primarily where
Speaker 1: I want to focus on this episode. So I'm gonna
Speaker 1: go ahead and share the screen at this time. And
Speaker 1: for anybody who would like to join in on the
Speaker 1: conversation over the Cajun I Live, which needed to do
Speaker 1: what Jesus I can't speak, What you need to do
Speaker 1: is go to patreon dot com slash Cajun Night. When
Speaker 1: you go there, there's only a few tiers for entry,
Speaker 1: and uh, we are, you know, just trying to grow
Speaker 1: this to be its own independent thing. It's only a
Speaker 1: five dollar tier one tier and we're we share the information,
Speaker 1: we open form discuss it every Wednesday night at nine
Speaker 1: pm Centro and it's always a good time, you know,
Speaker 1: looking at the geopolitical conversations and religious conversations, sometimes even
Speaker 1: the philosophical conversations or the historical We're all over the
Speaker 1: place here, but I appreciate all of you for joining
Speaker 1: me and growing this to being what it is now.
Speaker 1: So let's get into it here. We're gonna start off
Speaker 1: talking about the Vatican. Pope Leo the fourteenth has apparently
Speaker 1: closed the Holy Door. Now, if you're not a Catholic,
Speaker 1: this may not jump out at you as being a
Speaker 1: really big thing, but apparently it is a deal. It's
Speaker 1: a whole thing that people are talking about here, So
Speaker 1: let's talk about it here. He closed the Holy door
Speaker 1: concluding Jubilee Year of Hope on the Lord's Epiphany. So
Speaker 1: on the solemnity of the Epiphany of the Lord, Pope
Speaker 1: Leo the fourteenth presides over the Holy Mass in Saint
Speaker 1: Peter's Basilica for some fifty eight hundred faithful and closes
Speaker 1: the last Holy Door, marking the official end of the
Speaker 1: Jubilee Year of Hope. Royce, correct me if I'm wrong.
Speaker 1: The Jubilee year. Is that a thing that's also celebrated
Speaker 1: in the Jewish and Hebrew culture, or is that specifically
Speaker 1: a Catholick thing.
Speaker 2: Yes and no.
Speaker 1: Explain.
Speaker 3: According to the Toroh, we are there every there is
Speaker 3: a seven year cycle that goes into a forty nine
Speaker 3: slash fifty year cycle, and there are certain offerings that
Speaker 3: are offered certain times a year, and there's times where the.
Speaker 2: Land must remain fallow. I believe that we know when.
Speaker 3: The Jubilee year is, and there are some things that
Speaker 3: are observed, but as far as like the main thing,
Speaker 3: it's not really done anymore because we don't have a temple.
Speaker 3: And I think even though we have a general idea
Speaker 3: of what year it is, what we believe it could
Speaker 3: be off, so it's not exactly celebrated, which is the
Speaker 3: reason why outside of the land of Israel you have
Speaker 3: a two day holiday, even though in the Land of
Speaker 3: Israel you would have one one day holiday.
Speaker 1: Got you Okay, fair enough, So let's get into it.
Speaker 2: Here.
Speaker 1: It says at the start of Mass, the Pope closed
Speaker 1: the holy door of Saint Peter's Basilica, the last of
Speaker 1: the holy doors opened for Jubilee year. The gesture marked
Speaker 1: the end of months in which quote a stream of
Speaker 1: innumerable men and women, pilgrims of hope, crossed the threshold
Speaker 1: of the Basilica, journeying toward what the Pope described as quote,
Speaker 1: the new Jerusalem, the city whose doors are always open. Okay,
Speaker 1: fair enough, the Magi and Herod. So I think this
Speaker 1: is the historical background to it. Here, Reflecting the Gospel
Speaker 1: of the day taken from Matthew, the Pope in his
Speaker 1: homily focused on the joy of the Magi and the
Speaker 1: fear of Herod, noting that scripture never hides the tension
Speaker 1: that accompanies God's manifestation. Every time sacred scripture speaks of
Speaker 1: God's manifesting himself, he said, it does not hide the
Speaker 1: contrasting reactions such as joy and agitation, resistance and obedience,
Speaker 1: fear and longing. The epiphany. He reveals a God whose
Speaker 1: presence never leaves things as they are today. We say,
Speaker 1: celebrate the epiphany of the Lord, aware that in his
Speaker 1: presence nothing stays the same. Okay, fair enough, I guess
Speaker 1: except for God he stays the same. But yeah, the
Speaker 1: divine appearing, the Pope continued, marks the beginning of hope.
Speaker 1: God's presence puts an end to that type of melancholic
Speaker 1: complacency which causes people endlessly to say there is nothing
Speaker 1: new under the sun. Instead, something new begins, which determines
Speaker 1: the present and the future, fulfilling the prophetic promise. Araj shine,
Speaker 1: for your light has come and the glory of the
Speaker 1: Lord has risen upon you. Yet it is Jerusalem, the
Speaker 1: Pope continued, a city accustomed to revelation that is troubled
Speaker 1: by the Magi's search. Those who know the scripture and
Speaker 1: quote think they have all the answers in quote, the
Speaker 1: Pope noted, seem to have lost the ability to ask
Speaker 1: questions and cultivate a sense of longing. The city is
Speaker 1: unsettled by those who arrive moved by hope, threatened by
Speaker 1: what should instead be a source of joy. This reaction,
Speaker 1: he said, also challenges us as a church. Okay, very interesting,
Speaker 1: So the searching of today's men and women. Reflecting men
Speaker 1: on Jubilee, Poplo invited the faithful to consider the spiritual
Speaker 1: searching of today's men and women. Who were these men
Speaker 1: and women and what motivated them? He asked, What did
Speaker 1: they find? What was their hearts, their questions, their feelings?
Speaker 1: Like the Magi said, many still feel compelled to set out,
Speaker 1: and the Magi still exists today. He stressed, They are
Speaker 1: those who sense the need to go out and search,
Speaker 1: accepting the risks associated with their journey, even in a
Speaker 1: world that is often unpleasant and dangerous. Okay. The Gospel,
Speaker 1: the Pope said, calls the church not to fear this
Speaker 1: movement of searching humanity, but to appreciate it and orient
Speaker 1: it toward God who sustains us. This is not a
Speaker 1: God who can be controlled. He is a God who
Speaker 1: can unsettle us because he does not remain firmly in
Speaker 1: our hands like the idols of silver and gold. Instead,
Speaker 1: he is alive and life giving, like the baby whom
Speaker 1: Mary cradled in her arms, and whom wise men adored.
Speaker 1: For this reason, holy places must communicate life, Jubilee, pilgrimage sites,
Speaker 1: and the Pope said, must diffuse the aroma of life,
Speaker 1: the unforgettable realization that another world has begun. He then
Speaker 1: posed the question, is their life in our church is
Speaker 1: their space for something new to be born? Do we
Speaker 1: love and proclaim a God who sets us on a journey. Now,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you it's very interesting to hear a Catholic
Speaker 1: pope talk about change within the church. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: this is inherently a negative thing by any means, but
Speaker 1: especially for Roman Catholic and that their whole jam is
Speaker 1: long standing tradition and long standing rules. I have been
Speaker 1: hearing murmurs that we very well might have a Vatican
Speaker 1: three happen under Pope Leo, and there were talks about
Speaker 1: that under Pope Francis as well, because he was, you know,
Speaker 1: the first non European pope. He was very liberal in
Speaker 1: his political ideations and these types of things. But I
Speaker 1: think it's not crazy to say that he was a
Speaker 1: bit of an outlier among his peers even when he
Speaker 1: was a cardinal and archbishop and these types of things.
Speaker 1: Most Catholic priests are pretty conservative minded if they're going
Speaker 1: to go into the realm of politics. The good ones
Speaker 1: stay away from politics and worry about their job in
Speaker 1: people's spiritual walks. But every so often, sometimes the political
Speaker 1: and the religious blend depends on the topic and depends
Speaker 1: on the day and age, and I get that. But
Speaker 1: Leo seems to be I don't want to say new
Speaker 1: Age because that gets such a weird connotation associated with
Speaker 1: that these days, but he does seem to have a
Speaker 1: lot of talking points that would make him seem as
Speaker 1: though he's he's like the newer generations Pope, and it's
Speaker 1: very possible that we have a Vatican three to I
Speaker 1: don't want to use the term teared down certain traditions
Speaker 1: that have made the Catholic Church what they are, but
Speaker 1: more or less revamp a lot of the long standing
Speaker 1: traditions that make Roman Catholics Roman Catholics. I don't know
Speaker 1: if that's true. I could be very wrong here, but
Speaker 1: I've been hearing a lot of murmurs on the back
Speaker 1: end on this, so let's go. It says at the
Speaker 1: heart of the Epiphany. Here, at the heart of the Epiphany,
Speaker 1: said Pope Leo, bringing a close to his homily, stands
Speaker 1: a gift that cannot be bought or controlled. The child
Speaker 1: whom the magi adore is a priceless and immeasurable good.
Speaker 1: His revelation does not take place in a prestigious location,
Speaker 1: but in a humble place. And yet to Bethlehem it
Speaker 1: has said, you are, by no means least it is
Speaker 1: wonderful to become pilgrims of hope. The Pope said, it
Speaker 1: is wonderful for us to continue to be pilgrims together. Finally,
Speaker 1: he concluded, if the church resists becoming a mind and
Speaker 1: remains a home. He concluded, she may yet become the
Speaker 1: generation of a new dawn, guided always by Mary, Star
Speaker 1: of the Morning, toward an extraordinary humanity, transformed not by
Speaker 1: delusions of the all powerful, but by God who became
Speaker 1: flesh out of love. Interesting, and so again, I not
Speaker 1: say anything negative towards pop Leo as of this moment.
Speaker 1: I know a lot of people. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: mixed reviews as far as how people view him these days,
Speaker 1: and everybody's in to ore of their opinion for sure.
Speaker 1: But again, we'll see, we will see. That might even
Speaker 1: go on the Bengo car for twenty twenty seven, if
Speaker 1: there will be a Vatican three happen. I don't know
Speaker 1: if that's gonna. I don't know. Maybe it's a little
Speaker 1: maybe it's a little early to make such presumptions. Go ahead, Royce, No,
Speaker 1: it was just gonna.
Speaker 2: I was just gonna ask your question.
Speaker 3: After you're finished with the article, would you like a
Speaker 3: couple of g whiz fun facts about the year of
Speaker 3: Jubilee according to orthodox Judaism.
Speaker 1: Please do.
Speaker 3: I'm done with the article, Okay, So all right, so yo,
Speaker 3: So it's called yovel, which basically means jubilee.
Speaker 4: So Yova is the fiftieth year in the Torah land
Speaker 4: based cycle.
Speaker 2: Following a seven year Schmita cycle. So the shmita is
Speaker 2: when you leave.
Speaker 3: The land fallow. So the sources so one is in
Speaker 3: Leviticus twenty five. It's also the mission of Gamara, which
Speaker 3: is uh the the townlet specifically in Tractates Russia, Shana
Speaker 3: and Arichin and excuse me, and then is basically codified
Speaker 3: also by the Rambam and specifically under the hilkhos or
Speaker 3: the Jewish laws of Schmita and jovel. So according to
Speaker 3: the Orthodox alakas or Jewish law, so Yovo only applies
Speaker 3: when the majority of Jews are living in Israel and
Speaker 3: when the tribal teartories are intact.
Speaker 2: So since neither one of those things.
Speaker 3: Are happening, it's not practiced even rabbinically.
Speaker 1: I don't know the real statistics on this, but are
Speaker 1: the majority of the Jews not living in Israel right now?
Speaker 3: No, the majority of the Jews are, so I don't
Speaker 3: so let's just say if there are thirteen million Jews
Speaker 3: in the world, let's just just throw out the number
Speaker 3: I believe seven million would be outside statistically and six
Speaker 3: million would be inside.
Speaker 2: So I don't know what the number is. But if
Speaker 2: you think of like.
Speaker 3: Big big communities like Lakewood, New Jersey, Brooklyn, Maryland, Baltimore,
Speaker 3: like Seattle, California, or whatever, overwhelmingly there are more Jews
Speaker 3: outside the land of Israel than it.
Speaker 2: I don't know exactly what that number is, and I don't.
Speaker 3: Know how close we are to going the opposite direction,
Speaker 3: but as of right now, that does not apply.
Speaker 1: Interesting, and yeah, all the tribal lands back, I mean
Speaker 1: as long as the as long as the northern section
Speaker 1: and Gaza are not under Israeli controlled and that also
Speaker 1: can't be accurate correct.
Speaker 3: Basically, So have you seen any of the ancient maps
Speaker 3: where it says like where each tribe is supposed to
Speaker 3: be then Aftali Bakar Zavuin.
Speaker 2: So yeah, since we don't have that, that also doesn't apply.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 3: So furthermore so the agricultural laws, So just like Schmitta,
Speaker 3: which is where you leave the land fallus, there's no
Speaker 3: plan your harvesting. The produce is considered ownerless, so you
Speaker 3: can eat it, but you just can't use it for commercial.
Speaker 2: Produce.
Speaker 3: Also all on all ancestral land returns. The original family
Speaker 3: land cells are actual long term leases. And this only
Speaker 3: applies to Israel aspose others. Hebrew slaves go free, so
Speaker 3: all Jewish slaves are free, even slaves who choose to
Speaker 3: stay behind are beyond the six years, there is a
Speaker 3: cancelation of servitude and or no debts. So Shmiita cancels
Speaker 3: out any kind of major debts. There's way around that,
Speaker 3: but it's supposed to be that way. And then yeah,
Speaker 3: so years one through six is normal farming. Then year
Speaker 3: seven is the year where you leave it fallow. And
Speaker 3: then you do set seven of those cycles and then
Speaker 3: that there's that fifty fiftieth year.
Speaker 1: Okay, soud you believe happens on a fifty year basis,
Speaker 1: or it's like a seven year.
Speaker 3: Basis fifty so there's seven seven times seven. So if
Speaker 3: you have seven years of Schmiita or seven Shmida years,
Speaker 3: and then on that last one is your.
Speaker 2: Fiftieth fiftieth year, so every fifty years there would be jubilee.
Speaker 1: And so okay, I'm with you and this I remember
Speaker 1: everybody was worried about the rapture last year talking about
Speaker 1: the feast of trumpets and yeah, yeah, so that's what
Speaker 1: is a yearly think that's the Jewish.
Speaker 2: New that is that is literally a an annual thing.
Speaker 1: Okay. And on the year of Jubilee is there like
Speaker 1: a different way to bring in the new year.
Speaker 2: So this is basically agricultural. These are like laws dealing
Speaker 2: with the land, not dealing with people. So like with Russia,
Speaker 2: Shana being.
Speaker 3: The the new year and even ten days later being
Speaker 3: the day of the Day of Atonement, these things are
Speaker 3: between people and God as opposed to this is the
Speaker 3: laws that we have dealing with the land to real
Speaker 3: to realize that the land belongs to God. Because one
Speaker 3: of the very interesting things about the Schmidty year is
Speaker 3: that you're not allowed to plant or and you're not
Speaker 3: allowed to harvest, and so theoretically, the way that nature
Speaker 3: normally runs, that following year would be a shit year, right,
Speaker 3: But in the tore it says that if you follow
Speaker 3: these laws, I will basically give you double the produce.
Speaker 2: That way you're not going to have to worry about it.
Speaker 3: And I think that there have been some stories that
Speaker 3: I've heard where there are people, there are farmers in Israel,
Speaker 3: you have those who are stringent on this and those
Speaker 3: that are are not stringent. And the ones that are stringent,
Speaker 3: like they have that bountiful following year as opposed to
Speaker 3: the ones that actually don't, they seem to suffer more so.
Speaker 1: So I've done some digging as far as for agricultural reasons, right,
Speaker 1: the ones that are treating their land in the how
Speaker 1: could I word this the correct way that was prescribed
Speaker 1: in the Book of Deuteronomy, in the Book of Levi
Speaker 1: as far as uh, leaving the outer rows of your
Speaker 1: land for the poor, you know, even not the whole
Speaker 1: tithing a tenth thing, although that too, not growing certain
Speaker 1: crops like in the sequential order, like growing different rows
Speaker 1: and different fields for different crops, and basically yeah, it
Speaker 1: can't intermingle exactly. For those that follow these rules, they
Speaker 1: do have a better yield. And it's some of these
Speaker 1: we in today's technology, in today's world, we know like, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: no shit, you can't plant every other tree down your orchard.
Speaker 1: This one's apple, this one's peach, and expect for everything
Speaker 1: to just go coot like gucci. That's not gonna work,
Speaker 1: you know. So and a lot of that we know
Speaker 1: now because of modern agricultural practices, but even some of
Speaker 1: the more obscure methods of farming. Apparently the Old Testament
Speaker 1: tells you exactly how to get the best bang for
Speaker 1: buck out of your land. And I don't believe I've
Speaker 1: ever seen somebody follow that to the word and have
Speaker 1: bad yields. So there's something to be said for that
Speaker 1: for sure.
Speaker 2: Not by the way, speaking of mixture, so it's very interesting.
Speaker 3: So there are only three main cases in the Toro
Speaker 3: where it comes to.
Speaker 2: Prohibited mixtures.
Speaker 3: So one of them is when it comes to agriculture, right,
Speaker 3: you can't plant multiple things to create new fruit.
Speaker 2: You can't.
Speaker 3: Plants or of things, so I don't I don't know
Speaker 3: about hybrid plants, beast, you can't plant them together.
Speaker 2: Okay, you also can't plant your ca. When it comes to.
Speaker 3: Garments, as you've known, as you you've spoken about a
Speaker 3: number of times, there's there's mixture, mixtures of wool linen
Speaker 3: that you're not allowed to wear except for one case,
Speaker 3: believe it or not, there's one that correct that is
Speaker 3: the exception to the rule.
Speaker 2: And then when it comes to plowing, you can't you
Speaker 2: can't or a if.
Speaker 3: You're if you have two animals that need to pull
Speaker 3: something like a carriage or a plow. You are not
Speaker 3: allowed to have different species of animals together because.
Speaker 1: Then they be unevenly yoked and that's not good. Yeah man,
Speaker 1: it's it's crazy that I mean. And again, to us
Speaker 1: today this sounds like, well, yeah, no ship. But to
Speaker 1: the people of four thousand years ago, this was crazy,
Speaker 1: crazy things to just apply to your daily life. But yeah, man.
Speaker 1: But also when this was written down, being a Jew
Speaker 1: didn't require these other hundreds and hundreds of rules. It
Speaker 1: was it was pretty baseline. Whenever we're talking prete.
Speaker 4: Before the tour was given, yes, after, after the tour
Speaker 4: was given No, Because even though it wasn't written until
Speaker 4: after the destruction of the Second.
Speaker 3: Temple, it was all this was transmitted orally from the
Speaker 3: time of Moses up until that point.
Speaker 1: Wait wait, wait, wait wait, the Tora wasn't written down
Speaker 1: until after the destruction of the Second time.
Speaker 3: No no, no, no, no no no no, not the
Speaker 3: or the oral transmission of all these laws. So even
Speaker 3: though it wasn't written down, that's why it's called tourist
Speaker 3: all pay, which means like the the the oral transmission.
Speaker 3: So all these obscure laws and all everything was being taught.
Speaker 3: It just wasn't written down up until that point. It
Speaker 3: was taught from Moses to Joshua, to Joshua to the
Speaker 3: elders others of the Great Assembly, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 1: Okay, so it was more of like a cultural thing, correct, gotcha? Hmm?
Speaker 1: I swear I just learned more and more on these
Speaker 1: cults or on the cult on the Cage to Nights,
Speaker 1: specifically with the Euroys. But everybody kind of adds in
Speaker 1: their own things. But yeah, and so I also find
Speaker 1: it interesting how Catholicism took on certain attributes from traditional
Speaker 1: Judaism and kind of rebranded them to their own means,
Speaker 1: like the year of Jubilee. To my knowledge, I think
Speaker 1: maybe the Eastern Orthodox, maybe the Egyptian Coptics. And I
Speaker 1: mean we could maybe make an argument for the Syrian
Speaker 1: or in Assyrian Church. The shit south of Uh is
Speaker 1: a Soudan, trying to think south of Egypt. There's another
Speaker 1: group or Ethiopian, the Ethiopian Coptics. I think they might
Speaker 1: hold some sort of a or the Jubilee year type
Speaker 1: of thing, But most Protestants are kind of like nah
Speaker 1: we were not really operating like that. But yeah, it's
Speaker 1: very interesting to see what kind of things made the
Speaker 1: translation or made the transition, i should say, from traditional
Speaker 1: Judaism to Christianity, at least in the early church days.
Speaker 1: I agree. Well, anyway, good things lessons learned here. Let's
Speaker 1: move on to the next talking point. So, for those
Speaker 1: that didn't hear, Elon Musk, his French home just got
Speaker 1: raided because of some of the things that are going
Speaker 1: on on the X platform. Apparently when Groc went a
Speaker 1: little extra what is it called a mecha Nazi last
Speaker 1: year or whatever it was, Apparently X has still gone
Speaker 1: so anti semitic, and France has some of the harshest
Speaker 1: anti semitic laws on earth. So like, if you're a
Speaker 1: French Holocaust denial, you will be getting a knock on
Speaker 1: your door, if not a kick to the door. So
Speaker 1: apparently because of Groc, Elon Musk's French headquarters for X
Speaker 1: just got rated. Let's learn about this one together, y'all.
Speaker 5: Nice, let's talk about what exactly French investigators were looking for.
Speaker 6: Yeah, Chris, so the Paris Prosecutor's office confirming in a
Speaker 6: statement that they did raid the Paris offices of X
Speaker 6: earlier Today, we understand that it was their cybercrime unit
Speaker 6: that carried out the search, but EUROPAUL, the European Union's
Speaker 6: police agency, was also involved. Now, this was all part
Speaker 6: of an investigation that was first opened back in January
Speaker 6: of last year over concerns that X's algorithms are biased.
Speaker 6: The probe was later expanded over the summer, and the
Speaker 6: Paris Prosecutor's office sing in a statement the investigations concerned
Speaker 6: breaches of French law resulting from the provision of a
Speaker 6: tool GROCK, enabling the generation and or dissemination of child
Speaker 6: sexual abuse material, sexually explicit, deep fakes or anti Semitic content. Now,
Speaker 6: prosecutors have asked both Elon Musk and former CEO Linda
Speaker 6: Jaquarini to attend voluntary interviews in the spring. We know
Speaker 6: that ex employees have also been asked to appear as witnesses,
Speaker 6: and Worth pointing out that back in December the EU
Speaker 6: find an X one hundred and forty million dollars for
Speaker 6: failing to comply with transparency laws transparency obligations, so one
Speaker 6: of their concerns, for example, was the blue check marks.
Speaker 6: That EU ruled that those verified accounts were misleading because
Speaker 6: they suggested that there had been an identity verification on
Speaker 6: those accounts that in fact had not been carried out.
Speaker 6: So we've seen the EU, I think, you know, across
Speaker 6: the board trying to regulate big tech. Here France certainly
Speaker 6: leading the way in that department. It's become quite a
Speaker 6: big point of contention between the US and the EU,
Speaker 6: the US pushing for the EU to ease up on
Speaker 6: some of those restrictions by threatening tariffs. We saw France
Speaker 6: in the aftermath of everything that went on with Greenland,
Speaker 6: announcing that the French government would no longer be using
Speaker 6: Zoom for example. They're going to be now moving to
Speaker 6: using a French platform known as Visio, which is essentially
Speaker 6: the French equivalent of Zoom. But the French and I
Speaker 6: think the European Union more broadly, have been talking about
Speaker 6: this idea of digital sovereignty. They don't want to rely
Speaker 6: on the US when it comes to big tech.
Speaker 3: And that's stale kutara, thank you.
Speaker 2: And.
Speaker 1: So there we have it. X just got rated in
Speaker 1: France because of and some of those I can understand, right,
Speaker 1: especially if it's like a sexually explicit material that might
Speaker 1: have children involved or something like that, and some of
Speaker 1: these age verifications were lied about. Okay, okay, I see
Speaker 1: where they're going with this. A lot of the sources
Speaker 1: that I found made it out to be that it
Speaker 1: was specifically because of the anti Semitic rhetoric that Grok
Speaker 1: was putting out there. Yeah, and now, who's to say, right,
Speaker 1: it's very possible that that was all done as basically
Speaker 1: just the smoking gun, so to say. But in reality,
Speaker 1: they were trying to go in there and just dismantle
Speaker 1: his program, and they were using any kind of justification
Speaker 1: for their actions. I don't know, but yeah, apparently X
Speaker 1: is getting the crackdown in different countries, shockinging not America.
Speaker 1: Who could have seen that coming? But anyway, all right,
Speaker 1: moving over to Al Jazeera here, so Trump says, talk
Speaker 1: to the RAN, continuing as US shoots down in Iranian drone.
Speaker 1: All right, before I read this article, I don't understand
Speaker 1: what all the hypees about on this one. So a
Speaker 1: couple of days ago, Iran launched their big, bad secret rocket,
Speaker 1: and it was it was the thing that was gonna
Speaker 1: make everybody back off and say, whoa man, we don't
Speaker 1: want to smoke with Iran. They've got a secret weapon.
Speaker 1: And then it was discovered exactly what that was, and
Speaker 1: it was literally nothing to worry about. It was though
Speaker 1: it was like their ultimate saber rattle. It wasn't anything
Speaker 1: of a nuclear capacity. It was like a h oh,
Speaker 1: what's it called shahied I for I forget. A lot
Speaker 1: of their things are called Shahed or shit eat or
Speaker 1: whatever the fuck, and that's based off of the name
Speaker 1: itself comes from one of their uh generals who led
Speaker 1: the Islamic revolution in their country, and he was like
Speaker 1: their great heath Z militarily speaking anyway. So that's why
Speaker 1: that name is on everything, whether it's a drone, a
Speaker 1: new rocket, a new airplane or whatever. But beside the point,
Speaker 1: they launched this rocket and they thought that this was
Speaker 1: going to be taken seriously, it wasn't. Nobody literally, no
Speaker 1: one has slowed down. The Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier Group
Speaker 1: is currently parked off in the sea outside of Iran.
Speaker 1: They might as well rename that bitch the Sea of
Speaker 1: America as of this moment, with all the assets that
Speaker 1: we have in that little body of water right now.
Speaker 1: And so they launched a drone and F thirty five. See,
Speaker 1: if I'm not mistaken shot it down. It's not like
Speaker 1: that's a massive victory. It's a drone and it's the
Speaker 1: F thirty five. Like we got that. It was kind
Speaker 1: of a it was a quick thing that could have
Speaker 1: been brushed under the rug and nobody would ever heard
Speaker 1: about it. But apparently it's a big deal. Things are escalating.
Speaker 1: Shot down a drone. It's like, brother, we bombed their
Speaker 1: nuclear facilities last year, Like, what are we talking about here?
Speaker 1: But anyway, let's let's read in this together. I feel
Speaker 1: like I'm just missing the hype. I don't know.
Speaker 2: So.
Speaker 1: Trump's comments come as Iran's president instructs his foreign minister
Speaker 1: to pursue fair and equitable negotiations with the US. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I bet so, I bet so. Anyway, United States President
Speaker 1: Trump has said that talks of Iran are continuing to
Speaker 1: try to de escalate tensions in the Gulf, even as
Speaker 1: the US military announced shooting down an Iranian drome that
Speaker 1: approached its aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea. I believe again,
Speaker 1: we could probably call that the American Sea right now,
Speaker 1: but it's temporary, Trump tole reporters at the White House
Speaker 1: on Tuesday that Washington was negotiating with Iran right now,
Speaker 1: but declining to say where the talks were taking place.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna throw it out. Probably Abu Dhabi or Dubai,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know that for a fact,
Speaker 1: but that's probably where they're going down, because that's where
Speaker 1: all the big negotiations go down. But anyway, the talks
Speaker 1: are all over, but they are negotiating. They liked the
Speaker 1: talks are all over, but they are negotiating. Does that
Speaker 1: sound like double speak to anybody?
Speaker 7: Just me?
Speaker 1: All right, they'd like to do something, and we'll see
Speaker 1: if something is going to be done. Only hot takes
Speaker 1: coming from Donnie t at this time. They had a
Speaker 1: chance to do something while ago and it didn't work out,
Speaker 1: and we did Midnight Hammer, which again I'm just throwing
Speaker 1: it out broad terms here. That's probably one of the
Speaker 1: best nicknames for a military operation we've ever heard of
Speaker 1: in my life. Operation Midnight Hammer. Objectively, that shit's badass.
Speaker 1: But all right, I don't think they want that happening again,
Speaker 1: he added, referring to the operation last June, when the
Speaker 1: US Air Force and Navy struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they do not want that again any means. And that's
Speaker 1: the other Yeah, they were underground, and America is the
Speaker 1: only country that has the bunker Busters capable of penetrating
Speaker 1: the ground to that depth and then exploding. They only
Speaker 1: went down a few more feet. They think that that
Speaker 1: was like the extent of our ground penetrating ordinance. That
Speaker 1: sure wasn't. That sure wasn't. So them going down another
Speaker 1: twenty feet ain't really stopping nothing. But I guess they
Speaker 1: may may have to find that out the hard way.
Speaker 1: Who knows, Sam go ahead?
Speaker 8: Yeah, oh do they do? They not realize if America
Speaker 8: really wanted they could completely turn the entire part of
Speaker 8: the desert sandbox whatever you want to call over there,
Speaker 8: the entire middle least, if we really wanted to, we
Speaker 8: could fuck up the entire topographic area of it to
Speaker 8: the point we could probably blow it so so much
Speaker 8: we could probably see other people like me come out
Speaker 8: from the bottom so and blow a whole all the
Speaker 8: way to China.
Speaker 1: I'm not Chinese. Yeah, they I feel like they keep
Speaker 1: underestimating our capabilities and it's crazy at this point. I'm
Speaker 1: not just saying this because I'm an American and because
Speaker 1: I think that our military is so bad ours. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: just looking on paper with the things that are openly disclosed,
Speaker 1: not even the stuff that we have that we know
Speaker 1: that works that we haven't released and put on the
Speaker 1: battlefield yet. We really are so far out what we're scaling.
Speaker 9: Uh.
Speaker 8: The Department of War came out and said, yeah, we
Speaker 8: have direcdentity weapons and we're scaling them now. I mean,
Speaker 8: we're probably gonna be putting a bitch launched on battleships
Speaker 8: and all, which I think would be awesome.
Speaker 1: We can have Star Wars. Ronald Reagan would be so proud.
Speaker 1: They have a couple of rail guns that are currently
Speaker 1: on naval vessels. That's the thing we have Japan.
Speaker 2: Japan just perfected it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And then last time I saw DARPA now that
Speaker 1: they were able to capture a photon of light, like
Speaker 1: an actual light particle, and they were able to stop
Speaker 1: it and freeze it and be able to tell what
Speaker 1: its mass is. They're now working towards manipulating it. We
Speaker 1: may have like light cannons soon. Like we're talking about
Speaker 1: breaking down the fabric of time and space in a
Speaker 1: military weapons arena, Like this is something that no other
Speaker 1: nation has anything glows. Oh well, this country's got hypersonics,
Speaker 1: but just the fuck up. Yeah, until you freeze a
Speaker 1: particle of light and are trying to use that as
Speaker 1: a sniper rifle. I don't want to hear it. Like,
Speaker 1: what are we talking about.
Speaker 2: Here, Jacob.
Speaker 1: It's funny you bought up photons.
Speaker 8: Fun fact, it takes a single photon forty thousand years
Speaker 8: to each from the core of the Sun to the surface.
Speaker 8: Then it only takes eight minutes to leave from the
Speaker 8: Sun's surface to go through the vacuum of space or
Speaker 8: visus fluid as you would say, Jacob, into our atmosphere,
Speaker 8: eight seconds at the speed of light. Yeah, it takes
Speaker 8: it forty thousand years to go to surface from the
Speaker 8: core of the Sun to the to break from the
Speaker 8: the at the cusp of the Sun's but it doesn't.
Speaker 2: Have an atmosphere.
Speaker 1: It's about in a ball of mass perimeter, right something.
Speaker 8: I'm Asian, but I ain't that that that type of Asian.
Speaker 8: I ain't the small type.
Speaker 2: I just know a little bit about a lot.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but I just find it fascinating. It is fascinating,
Speaker 1: And again, we have had this technology for a while
Speaker 1: they're just now cool with talking about it out loud
Speaker 1: to us. You could find certain professional forums where they're
Speaker 1: discussing it, and even the same with the whole sound
Speaker 1: energy wavelength weapons and shit like that. We have had
Speaker 1: that in production since the late nineties. We are just
Speaker 1: now comfortable with other nations using it and being open
Speaker 1: about it and things like this. Whenever you got people
Speaker 1: or nations like Iran, who or Russia or China that
Speaker 1: think that they are even close to us in military capabilities,
Speaker 1: it's like, bro, I'm not trying to sound like a dick,
Speaker 1: but you are. So this is literally the equivalent of
Speaker 1: like the biggest third grader thinking that he is like
Speaker 1: hot shit and then meeting like a collegiate level football
Speaker 1: player and trying to act like he's about to take
Speaker 1: him on. Like sure, you could feel that, you can
Speaker 1: feel that to your little heart's content, But one of
Speaker 1: you is about to get moved out of the way
Speaker 1: of the other. But anyone. So, Trump, who has been
Speaker 1: pushing Tehran to agree to talk to over its nuclear program,
Speaker 1: has repeatedly threatened to attack the country again over a
Speaker 1: recent crackdown on anti government protests. He's been very vocal
Speaker 1: about that. The US President sent the USS Abraham Lincoln
Speaker 1: to the Gulf last week, leading to fears of a
Speaker 1: possible military confrontation. Again, it would not be much of
Speaker 1: a military confrontation if it was to go to that.
Speaker 1: If for whatever reason America really decided to like do war,
Speaker 1: it would be over in a matter of I'll be generous,
Speaker 1: in say, two weeks. I'll be very generous, in say
Speaker 1: two weeks. The carrier Strike Group, which brought roughly fifty
Speaker 1: seven hundred additional US troops, joined three destroyers and three
Speaker 1: litoral combat ships that were already in the region. Tensions
Speaker 1: have been easing in recent days amid a push by
Speaker 1: regional powers for resolution. Yal Be's so Iranian President, Mussades
Speaker 1: Pezeshkin Jesus, that's a name, said earlier on Tuesday that
Speaker 1: he had instructed the country's foreign ministers to quote pursue
Speaker 1: fair and equitable negotiations guided by the principles of dignity, prudence,
Speaker 1: and expediency, provided that a suitable environment exists. Yeah again,
Speaker 1: I'll bet he is trying to find some short negotiation.
Speaker 1: These negotiations shall be conducted within the framework of our
Speaker 1: national interests, Possessikon added, uh so, anyway, yeah, the drones shootdown.
Speaker 1: Iranian president's announcement came as the u IS US Central
Speaker 1: Commander Sentcom said, a US fighter jet from the USS
Speaker 1: Abraham Lincoln shot down the Iranian drone in self defense
Speaker 1: and to protect the aircraft carrier and personnel on board. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that would have been That would have been crazy. If
Speaker 1: that drone would have tried to actually touch the boat,
Speaker 1: that that would have been the worst mistake they could
Speaker 1: have done.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 1: Sent comm said that the you see see, uh Sentcom said,
Speaker 1: the Shahad excuse me, I said, shit, the excuse me?
Speaker 1: The shah head one point thirty nine drone aggressively approached
Speaker 1: quote unquote the aircraft carrier, which a sailing about eight
Speaker 1: hundred kilometers or five hundred freedom units from Aroan's southern
Speaker 1: coast when the with unclear intent, and it continued to
Speaker 1: fly towards the ship despite de escalatory measures taken by
Speaker 1: US forces operating in international waters. There was no immediate
Speaker 1: comment from the Iranian authorities. Again I'll bet so. Iran's
Speaker 1: Tasnin news agency, citing an unnamed source with knowledge of
Speaker 1: the matter, reported that the communication was lost with a
Speaker 1: drone which had quote successfully end quote sent data back
Speaker 1: to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in international waters. So
Speaker 1: apparently this drone was just sending data back and it
Speaker 1: wasn't out there to actually do some sort of violence,
Speaker 1: which I guess that's up to interpretation. Tazin said an
Speaker 1: investigation was underway to determine why the disconnection took place
Speaker 1: because it got shot out of the sky. What are
Speaker 1: we talking about here, Oh, I don't know what happened.
Speaker 1: We lost contact with a drone because it got got down.
Speaker 1: That's why you lost contact with it. Whatever. After the shootdown,
Speaker 1: Sentcom said the IRGC forces also harassed a US flagged
Speaker 1: and US crewed merchant vessel in the Strait of Horn Moves,
Speaker 1: a Gulf waterway critical to global trade. Two IRGC boats
Speaker 1: in an Iranian Mohadjer drone I probably mispronounced, it doesn't matter,
Speaker 1: it's Iranian approached MV Stennam Imperative at high speeds and
Speaker 1: threatened to board and seize the tanker once again. Uh,
Speaker 1: and that's not a US naval vessel, but is a
Speaker 1: US merchant vessel. And I really don't think that would
Speaker 1: have gone well for them grand scheme of things, especially
Speaker 1: saying is how we have an entire air strike group
Speaker 1: just a few miles away from it. But anyway, Iran's
Speaker 1: Fars news agency sided unnamed Iranian officials as saying later
Speaker 1: in the day that a vessel had entered Iranian territorial
Speaker 1: waters without necessary legal permits. Mm hmm. It's got an
Speaker 1: American flag on it, that's its legal permit, Okay. The
Speaker 1: official said the vessel was warned and left the area
Speaker 1: without any special security even taking place. Yeah, yeah, again, nobody,
Speaker 1: nobody's wanting to smoke on this one. Everybody's wanting to
Speaker 1: de escalate. Everybody's wanting to take it down a couple
Speaker 1: of notches. You know, nobody's trying to get they shit
Speaker 1: wrecked right now. But anyway, I did want to bring
Speaker 1: this up right, Iran had a drone get shot down,
Speaker 1: and that's that's a thing. And apparently now they're seeking
Speaker 1: fair and equitable negotiations after the drone was shot down.
Speaker 1: Moving on to the next top pic here, Jill Biden.
Speaker 1: Jill Biden, who just so we're all clear here and
Speaker 1: if anybody's questioning the legitimacy of what I'm about to say,
Speaker 1: it's a quick Google search away for you. So Jill Biden,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's wife, was the babysitter. Joe Biden's first wife
Speaker 1: died in a crazy car crash. Initial investigation showed that
Speaker 1: her break lines been cut, but no further investigation was done.
Speaker 1: Never any instance of foul play was ever brought up,
Speaker 1: nothing like that. It was just one of those things,
Speaker 1: you know, how those break lines, they'd just be snapping
Speaker 1: and all that with a clean cut. But we're not
Speaker 1: looking any deeper. She was the babysitter Joe and her
Speaker 1: got caught in some very compromising positions. Next thing you know,
Speaker 1: the wife dies and Jill marries him like a few
Speaker 1: months later. But apparently she was already married to this
Speaker 1: guy beforehand. And now Jill Biden's ex husband prior to
Speaker 1: the marriage to Joe, charged with the murder of his wife.
Speaker 1: It's very interesting, y'all. Let's learn about this together on
Speaker 1: a inside edition.
Speaker 5: The ex husband a former First Lady Jill Biden has
Speaker 5: been charged with killing his wife. Former First Lady Jill
Speaker 5: Biden's ex husband has been charged with murder sixty four
Speaker 5: year old Linda Stevenson seen here in this exclusive Inside
Speaker 5: Edition video, was found in her living room on December
Speaker 5: twenty eighth in Delaware, But after a month long investigation,
Speaker 5: police say they found evidence of foul play, and Stevenson
Speaker 5: has now been charged with first degree murder. Police won't
Speaker 5: say how his wife was killed. We spoke to Stevenson
Speaker 5: in twenty twenty when Joe Biden was running for president
Speaker 5: against Donald Trump. Back then, Stevenson made the blockbuster allegation
Speaker 5: that the Bidens were not telling the truth when they
Speaker 5: said they met on a blind date in nineteen seventy five.
Speaker 5: He claims they met three years earlier. Well, Joe's first wife, Neelia,
Speaker 5: was alive.
Speaker 7: I introduced Joe to Jill in seventy two. Jill, Joe,
Speaker 7: Neil and I were in his kitchen. How do you
Speaker 7: forget that?
Speaker 5: At the time, Jill Biden's spokesperson told us these claims
Speaker 5: are fictitious. The relationship of Joe and Jill Biden is
Speaker 5: well documented. They gushed to me about their relationship.
Speaker 7: He was sitting across the bar with a common friend
Speaker 7: and I said, is that Linda, And he said yes,
Speaker 7: And from that day on it'd never been apart.
Speaker 1: Quite a romanticness.
Speaker 5: I was right, Yes, he was persistent, Yes, very William
Speaker 5: Stevenson's bail has been set at five hundred thousand dollars cash.
Speaker 5: So far, the Bidens have not commented on the arrest.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that doesn't shock me. Of course, they're not going
Speaker 1: to comment on the arrest. But you know, it's one
Speaker 1: of those things because he clearly can remember when they
Speaker 1: all met the first time. And again, Joe Biden and
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's relationship is well documented. Correct, it is very
Speaker 1: well documented. Everybody knows the backstory to this. Well, they've
Speaker 1: done a good job of just kind of avoiding questioning
Speaker 1: on that. But again, it's it's really just a Google
Speaker 1: search away that that's reality. But anyway, that being said, now,
Speaker 1: could it be I'm not trying to make accusations here,
Speaker 1: I don't know these people. Could it be that Jill
Speaker 1: Biden or Hunter or one of these other people might
Speaker 1: have had something to do with this. I don't know
Speaker 1: that for a fact. I'm just throwing it out as
Speaker 1: a possibility. The Bidens are a very very scrupulous bunch,
Speaker 1: you know what I'm saying. But uh, anyway, you know what,
Speaker 1: We're gonna bring that one up next. Moving on to
Speaker 1: the next topic. Here, police make a fifth arrest over
Speaker 1: arson attacks on properties linked to the Prime Minister. So
Speaker 1: Keir Starmer, for anybody who doesn't know, is Britain's current
Speaker 1: prime minister. He is extremely unpopular even by members of
Speaker 1: his own party, and apparently they have had five different dudes.
Speaker 1: First of all, find out where he lives, like one
Speaker 1: of his residents is not like not the prime Minister's house,
Speaker 1: not the you know, the first show place. This if
Speaker 1: we're gonna put this to an American equipment, this would
Speaker 1: be like finding Trump's mar A Lago location, getting past
Speaker 1: security and trying to torch the place. This has happened
Speaker 1: five times from five different dudes, just in the last
Speaker 1: few weeks. First of all, I don't know where they're
Speaker 1: finding the intel on uh, of course they're gonna ask
Speaker 1: me to pay for it. I don't know where they're
Speaker 1: finding the intel. As far as where Kier Starmer lives,
Speaker 1: I don't know how they're getting past security with the
Speaker 1: whole you know arson type of jam. But somehow these
Speaker 1: dudes and and I heard I heard Count Dankula talk
Speaker 1: about it. He's like, I bet this dude's a twink,
Speaker 1: I bet he's gay. And then apparently all five of
Speaker 1: these dudes do in fact identify with the uh the
Speaker 1: Alphabet crew, which I also find very crazy because Keir
Speaker 1: Starmer I thought he was a friend to the Alphabet people,
Speaker 1: and apparently these are all dudes that are going after
Speaker 1: him that are members of the LGBTQ plus element op
Speaker 1: exclamation point hashtag society. I'm not sure what the background
Speaker 1: to this is. However, this particular guy, which the article
Speaker 1: is not pulling up for me right now, but there's
Speaker 1: other articles I read before this this guy is claiming
Speaker 1: and again I do not know to what level he
Speaker 1: has been psychiatrically evaluated, so I do not know how
Speaker 1: much water this claim holds. But apparently he is saying
Speaker 1: that once upon a time, Cure Starmer may or may
Speaker 1: not have assaulted him. And I'm also wondering if that
Speaker 1: is a true allegation. It's not gonna of course, the
Speaker 1: Prime ministers aren't gonna see his day in court. That's
Speaker 1: not gonna happen. But if that's a true accusation, I'm
Speaker 1: wondering if the other dudes, the other four guys who
Speaker 1: are trying to burn down his House also might have
Speaker 1: been victims of Sir Starmer just throwing it out. I
Speaker 1: don't know, I don't know. I'm not the guy to
Speaker 1: make these types of accusations because I'm not British, but
Speaker 1: it stands to reason, Sam, go ahead.
Speaker 10: Yeah, So wasn't it the British that put people in
Speaker 10: cages like the pirates and and left them to pretty
Speaker 10: much starve and said cage.
Speaker 1: Yeah, like one hundred and fifty years ago.
Speaker 8: Yeah, so why don't they bring if they can do
Speaker 8: that to pirates or whatever, even though they were paying
Speaker 8: the pirates or privateers, whatever you want to call them.
Speaker 1: Why don't they do that to the people.
Speaker 8: Why don't they do that to the people that are
Speaker 8: hurting children and raping people?
Speaker 1: They can't do that. They're trying to be friendly to
Speaker 1: Muslims right now, Bro, they just stopped the ball getting
Speaker 1: past about marrying your first cousin because it was racist
Speaker 1: to Muslims. They're not They're not going after pedophile.
Speaker 8: I forgot the beings on falafel now. Yep, yep, dude,
Speaker 8: did you see that there was a video in Minnesota
Speaker 8: where they have tore the American flag down and started
Speaker 8: off raising up the Somadi flag yelling.
Speaker 1: Oli ark bar I believe it. I just And of
Speaker 1: course Minnesota ice raids, evil Trump, bab blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: I get it. People are just so angry about these things.
Speaker 1: But as far as Britain.
Speaker 2: Is concerned, it's an invasion and a.
Speaker 8: Act of war.
Speaker 1: I would agree with this, but.
Speaker 8: Tear down American flag and throw up another country's flag
Speaker 8: in America, and you know, Olive arck bar On, death
Speaker 8: to America. Fuck you get We're gonna We're gonna do
Speaker 8: this Asian style.
Speaker 11: We're deep.
Speaker 8: We'll turn you deep five next Chrispy with the napalm
Speaker 8: extra Asia Orange.
Speaker 1: I mean, I agree, but at the same time, Britain
Speaker 1: has been bringing in such an influx of these people
Speaker 1: for so long that it's it's really changing the cultural
Speaker 1: dynamics of the country as a whole. Dude, And then,
Speaker 1: and I don't know, once again, to get back to
Speaker 1: the article, I don't know if the dude who tried
Speaker 1: to burn down Keir Starmer's house is actually some sort
Speaker 1: of a sexual assault victim of Keir Starmer. It's very,
Speaker 1: very possible that this guy's got a couple of screws
Speaker 1: loose and kind of made some claim to justify all
Speaker 1: of these things. But again, five different dudes trying to
Speaker 1: burn down Keir Starmer's house within the past few weeks,
Speaker 1: and all of them are members of that Alphabet crew
Speaker 1: that I'm starting to see a pattern. And again, Keir
Speaker 1: Starmer has been seen as a friend to the Alphabet Crew.
Speaker 1: It's just it. Certain things don't make sense here. One
Speaker 1: person I could take as a crazy person too. Okay,
Speaker 1: that crazier shit has happened. Five five, Brother, this is
Speaker 1: I don't even know what to call this. Royce what
Speaker 1: you got.
Speaker 2: Something kind of stupid?
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 3: This is a response to the whole falaffel thing. The falafel,
Speaker 3: by the way, itself is ground chickpeas. Yeah, peda is
Speaker 3: what it's on, So it wouldn't be butter, or it
Speaker 3: wouldn't be beans.
Speaker 2: On flaffel, be beans on pta.
Speaker 3: Just a stupid little correction because the falaffel.
Speaker 2: Is the ball that goes inside of the pita.
Speaker 4: Okay, I'm just what you're saying, But technically it's inaccurate,
Speaker 4: like jamatria soart.
Speaker 8: Okay, fair enough, so it is not inacturate. Grandpa buff
Speaker 8: is for whatever, goddamnit.
Speaker 1: It so what Sam is referring to, and if you
Speaker 1: ever hear me chime in on that. There's this content
Speaker 1: career named Habitual Line Crosser HLC. He just retired from
Speaker 1: the army and what he did in the army was
Speaker 1: based He's like, he's got missiletism basically, and he makes
Speaker 1: really funny content. And one of his characters that he
Speaker 1: does for his skits, they used to just make fun
Speaker 1: of Britain by calling him beans on toast rather than
Speaker 1: calling in the UK, And somewhere along the way they
Speaker 1: started calling it beans on falaffel. So I'm be honest
Speaker 1: with you, that's that's where that comes from. I didn't
Speaker 1: know the difference. I've never I don't think they've ever
Speaker 1: had a falaffel.
Speaker 2: So, by the way, by the way, falaffels are fantastic.
Speaker 2: They're deep fried. Oh they're amazing.
Speaker 1: Do you like hummuss Not really, it's a texture thing.
Speaker 1: The taste is fine. It's just I don't like.
Speaker 2: Pre chewed food, you know, so then you probably would
Speaker 2: like fal deep fried.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna try one one day.
Speaker 8: Funnel cake, well that's more American.
Speaker 3: Funnel cake is not like is not like falaffels.
Speaker 1: Comparing hummus and you're like, well, yeah, so there's a
Speaker 1: funnel cake, brother, I don't think that's what.
Speaker 12: He means deep like hummus and chickpeas. Anything that is
Speaker 12: pretty ground that's just depressing for the soul. If you're
Speaker 12: gonna eat something deep, but at least make it.
Speaker 8: Nourishing for the soul, go out to your local fare
Speaker 8: or whatever have you, and get.
Speaker 1: You a powdered funnel cake.
Speaker 8: I promise you your soul, thank you.
Speaker 1: I just thought about this. The way so falafel is
Speaker 1: they take essentially they take hummus and deep fry the
Speaker 1: paste and then.
Speaker 3: Put it on po No, no, no, So hummus is
Speaker 3: made from chickpeas, so you grind. So you grind up
Speaker 3: chickpeas and you and you basically kind of make a
Speaker 3: solid a little bit of a make a paste out
Speaker 3: of that or like work like a dough, and then
Speaker 3: you deep fry that.
Speaker 2: It's not nearly as ground up and like mixed together
Speaker 2: like like hummus, but it is.
Speaker 3: It is ground up chickpeas or garbonsa beans, which whichever
Speaker 3: nomenclature you prefer.
Speaker 2: That sounds depressing it's really good.
Speaker 1: Sounds like peanut butter dude, in a way deep fried
Speaker 1: chunky peanut butter, which and.
Speaker 3: Then you have all these wonderful spices that go inside
Speaker 3: of it, and you're takini and like spicy stuff and
Speaker 3: very good.
Speaker 2: It is a.
Speaker 1: Wonderful Middle Eastern dish.
Speaker 2: Not not just Muslims. Don't have like complete DIBs on it.
Speaker 1: Fair Okay? Well yeah, the bean the beans on flawful thing.
Speaker 1: I guess that's a bit of a misnumber. It should be. Uh,
Speaker 1: beans on PETA might be the right thing, but then
Speaker 1: people don't understand because PETA is gonna be the the
Speaker 1: animal rights.
Speaker 2: Group, the people eating tasty animals. Yeah, I'm all for that.
Speaker 1: I am too, But apparently some people think that like
Speaker 1: eating animals is wrong, and that's everybody's got their own
Speaker 1: freedom of choice on this one, you know.
Speaker 8: But you got sam, How how do people say eating
Speaker 8: animals is wrong? Because I have a face, okay, and
Speaker 8: only one of us is created in the little world's
Speaker 8: image and everybody loves chicken. Yeah, you gave me one
Speaker 8: person in the in this wall that ain't gonna look
Speaker 8: at a chicken. Say, I want to deep by that
Speaker 8: some bitch.
Speaker 1: I'm sure there's some person and.
Speaker 8: Then you know what, they're wrong and they need to
Speaker 8: be put in an asylum because chicken is good for you.
Speaker 1: So, I mean, the one meat that pretty much traverses
Speaker 1: all cultures is lamb, and I'm down with it. It's
Speaker 1: just gotta be cooked the right way. I forget. There
Speaker 1: was a commercial I saw not too long ago, and
Speaker 1: it was like all of the religious figures were sitting
Speaker 1: around a table and uh, you know, Jesus was there,
Speaker 1: and uh, what's the elephant god from the Vedics and
Speaker 1: pretty much all of them maybe I'm not sure if
Speaker 1: it's Vishnar or Krishna, which whichever one is the elephant one,
Speaker 1: and they were all sitting around. Somebody's like, where's Mohammed? Sorry,
Speaker 1: he couldn't make it. He couldn't find a babysitter with
Speaker 1: all his kids. And it was like there was a joke.
Speaker 1: It was all fun, and then somebody was like, so
Speaker 1: what are we having. This person wanted this, This person
Speaker 1: wanted this, And then this one person was like, why
Speaker 1: don't we have lamb, the one food that we can
Speaker 1: all eat. Everybody's like yeah, and it's like hmm, interesting
Speaker 1: that Lamb would traverse the cultures in such a way
Speaker 1: like that. You know, now everybody gets down with chicken.
Speaker 1: So the blue elephant God's name is Ganesha.
Speaker 8: Uh, it's g A n E s h A Gainsha
Speaker 8: Ganisha Ganisha.
Speaker 1: The Bargani. I don't know anyone. So yeah, so back back, back,
Speaker 1: back to the whole point here. Keir Starmer's house almost
Speaker 1: got burned down allegedly by a twink, and this is
Speaker 1: the fifth one to do it in a couple of weeks.
Speaker 1: I don't know what to make of it, but I
Speaker 1: thought it was interesting enough for us to talk about. Now,
Speaker 1: let's talk about Trump and Columbia's President Petro meeting in
Speaker 1: Washington after their feud and apparently now all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: now they've met face to face. Everybody's being good. Let's
Speaker 1: learn about this together.
Speaker 13: After months of trading barbs, US President Donald Trump met
Speaker 13: Columbian President Gustavo Petro at the White House on Tuesday.
Speaker 13: The closed door talks in Washington lasted around two hours,
Speaker 13: with no media present and no major agreements announced, but
Speaker 13: both leaders had warm words for each other, got along
Speaker 13: very well.
Speaker 1: He and I weren't exactly the best of friends. But
Speaker 1: I wasn't insulted because I never met him.
Speaker 3: I didn't know him at all, and we got along
Speaker 3: very well, and we are we're working on that.
Speaker 13: Some analysts and advisors had questioned whether the two would
Speaker 13: get along, given their months long hostility and that they
Speaker 13: represent radically different ideologies. Trump had called Petro an illegal
Speaker 13: drug leader, though he provided no evidence, and Petro, a
Speaker 13: former anti imperialist guerrilla, has called US operations in Latin
Speaker 13: America war crimes. Petro was invited to Washington after a
Speaker 13: January phone call. They both described positively any surprised thaw
Speaker 13: of relations, and while on Tuesday neither leader clearly said
Speaker 13: they reached any concrete agreement, Petro said the meeting was
Speaker 13: one of shared values.
Speaker 14: The impression I have from a recent meeting just a
Speaker 14: few hours ago is positive, first and foremost, that is
Speaker 14: the reality. Looking at the photos of the presidents of
Speaker 14: the United States, Lincoln was there in the picture freedom.
Speaker 14: We can be very different civilizationally speaking, too historically speaking,
Speaker 14: but what Unit says is freedom, and that is where
Speaker 14: the conversation began.
Speaker 13: Trump also told reporters that two leaders were working on
Speaker 13: sanctions without elaborating, Petro is under US sanctions for alleged
Speaker 13: but unproven links to the drug trade, which he denies, which.
Speaker 1: I mean, just to be honest, and I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to speak on this, I don't know much about Petrol
Speaker 1: or Petro excuse me, the claim that he is the
Speaker 1: leader of a drug ring very similar to what Trump
Speaker 1: was saying about Maduro. Columbia is in fact known for
Speaker 1: being a hub for drug growing and manufacturing. Now, I
Speaker 1: am not saying that Petro is or is not involved
Speaker 1: with this, although I'm assuming in a country that is
Speaker 1: pretty heavily involved with the cartels, he had to have
Speaker 1: been selected by them rather than elected by the people.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure there's some nuances there. I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to like get into the weeds on that, but I
Speaker 1: could see why Trump would make such a statement. I
Speaker 1: don't know how much of that is accurate, you know,
Speaker 1: but I do know that once Modureau was joined, people
Speaker 1: were questioning if Colombia was gonna be next on the list.
Speaker 1: We haven't had months and months worth of build up
Speaker 1: of shit talking and CIA assets going into Colombia and
Speaker 1: all of these things that I don't believe that he
Speaker 1: as of this moment, is in any risk of being
Speaker 1: yoinked up in the middle of the night. I just
Speaker 1: don't see it, especially now that this meeting has happened.
Speaker 1: I feel like whatever tensions there may have been, probably
Speaker 1: not for sure, but probably are onto a better footing
Speaker 1: as of this moment. So I guess we'll see. I'm
Speaker 1: glad that this was a very positive meeting for all parties,
Speaker 1: so all good things moving on. Now. Remember how I
Speaker 1: said that we weren't going to spend a whole lot
Speaker 1: of time talking about Epstein. I did think that this
Speaker 1: was a rather interesting article to pull up to talk
Speaker 1: about how some are claiming that Jeffrey Epstein is investigated
Speaker 1: for being a Russian spy. Now, hard pause before we
Speaker 1: read any further. We understand and know that Epstein was
Speaker 1: a Mussad asset. That's not a hot take. That's understood.
Speaker 1: We also understand that Epstein was a CIA asset. Again,
Speaker 1: not a hot take, it's an understood fact. And I
Speaker 1: have said for I think it's been years now that
Speaker 1: pretty much every country of note had some sort of
Speaker 1: an affiliation to Epstein because he was running a very
Speaker 1: successful blackmail operation. Aside from him being the world's kingpin
Speaker 1: of money long during If you want a blackmail on somebody,
Speaker 1: Epstein was your guy to get it. And so to
Speaker 1: say that he was a Chinese spy, a Russian spy,
Speaker 1: an Indian spy, a French spy, an American spy, Israeli spy, like,
Speaker 1: I guess technically all of that could be accurate, but
Speaker 1: we are being very fast and loose with what we
Speaker 1: are and are not classifying as a spy. I personally
Speaker 1: believe it's more into the realm of an asset than
Speaker 1: a spy, if that makes sense. But let's read into it.
Speaker 1: And also I think it's worth mentioning that this is
Speaker 1: from a Polish source, so shocker that Poland is trying
Speaker 1: to do something to say that Russia and Epstein have
Speaker 1: a connection. Poland is not exactly fond of Russia as
Speaker 1: of this very moment. So like, I understand all of that,
Speaker 1: But the connections that are being made with Epstein to
Speaker 1: Putin are not anything around any kind of child sex aggression,
Speaker 1: nothing along these lines whatsoever. To this day, as of
Speaker 1: this moment, as a time of recording, Putin has never
Speaker 1: been implemented in some sort of a pedophilic situation. I
Speaker 1: do want that to go on record. However, what if
Speaker 1: I was to tell you that Epstein was in fact
Speaker 1: Epstein's for lack of a better word, or Epstein was
Speaker 1: Putin's accountant, for lack of better words, and he was
Speaker 1: helping Putin move money from Russia to offshore accounts in very,
Speaker 1: very big ways, to the tune of like tens of
Speaker 1: millions of dollars. Again, I can't verify this, but there
Speaker 1: are somewhere around over a thousand emails that say so,
Speaker 1: and we'll get to it. We'll read it here in
Speaker 1: this article here anyway, This is from the Times. Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein investigated for being a Russian spy. Polish Prime Minister
Speaker 1: says photographs suggests financier was recruited to supply Moscow with
Speaker 1: compromat as Christopher Steele notes Robert Maxwell connection. Again, well,
Speaker 1: let's get into it here. So Poland has launched an
Speaker 1: investigation into whether Jeffrey Epstein acted as a spy for Russia,
Speaker 1: amidst suspicions he could have been paid for collecting compromising
Speaker 1: material on well known or well connected figures, which, again
Speaker 1: to the shock of literally no one. Donald Tusk. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Donald Tusk, the Polish Prime minister what an unfortunate name,
Speaker 1: told a government meeting that he was establishing a team
Speaker 1: to look into the numerous mentions of President Putin and
Speaker 1: other indications of Russian links in the Epstein files, as
Speaker 1: well as any impact on Poland. The US Department of
Speaker 1: Justice released millions of documents related to Epstein, has revealed
Speaker 1: the late financier and sex offenders ties to many prominent
Speaker 1: people in politics, business, and academia. There are one thousand
Speaker 1: and fifty six mentions of Putin and almost ten thousand
Speaker 1: references to Moscow, including suggestions of potential meetings with Putin.
Speaker 1: The type of photographs taken by Epstein and his associate
Speaker 1: Islam Maxwell, as well as personal secrets he learned, suggested
Speaker 1: a harvesting of compromat or compromising or blackmail Russian for
Speaker 1: compromising material of the type gathered by Moscow's FSB security
Speaker 1: agency to blackmail people. More and more leads, more and
Speaker 1: more information, more and more commentary in the global press,
Speaker 1: all related to this suspicion that this unprecedented pedophilia scandal
Speaker 1: was co organized by Russian intelligence services. Tusk said again,
Speaker 1: I am not saying that that is an incorrect or
Speaker 1: untrue statement. I am saying that most countries' intel wings
Speaker 1: had this type of co organization going on with Epstein.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's a crazy assumption to make at
Speaker 1: this point, especially with the millions of files that just
Speaker 1: got released. Continuing the quote here, I don't need to
Speaker 1: tell you how serious the increasingly likely possibility that the
Speaker 1: Russian intelligence services co organize this operation is for the
Speaker 1: security of the Polish state. This can only mean that
Speaker 1: they also possess compromising materials against many leaders still active today.
Speaker 1: So is this saying that is that Poland saying that
Speaker 1: some of the Polish leaders might have been on the island?
Speaker 1: Is that a little self guilt on that one, or
Speaker 1: are they talking about the Russian leaders, Because I could
Speaker 1: understand that, you know, if Putin needed some dirt on
Speaker 1: some of people, some of the people within his own party,
Speaker 1: so to speak, and he needed justified reasons to oust
Speaker 1: them if and when they ever tried to go against
Speaker 1: him in some way. Okay, But that's also the exact
Speaker 1: same thing that all of the other politicians that had
Speaker 1: the blackmail from Epstein did to their people. So it's
Speaker 1: yeah again. Maria Zarkova, a Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said
Speaker 1: in December that the Epstein affairs showed the hypocrisy of
Speaker 1: Western elites. Here, as I understood, were all Western lectures
Speaker 1: on life, who look down on Russia and who lectured
Speaker 1: us about democracy and human rights in interesting poses while
Speaker 1: equally interesting leisure partners, she posted on telegram. Interesting. Various
Speaker 1: indications of Russian influence emerged from the Epstein files, including
Speaker 1: in relation to Andrew Mountbotten Windsor, Yeah, Prince Andrew one
Speaker 1: or yeah, he's not a prince anymore. My bad, my bad,
Speaker 1: can't call him anymore. He lost that, so your boy,
Speaker 1: Andy Windsor. One document showed that Epstein offered to introduce
Speaker 1: him to Arena, a beautiful twenty six year old Russian woman,
Speaker 1: two years after Epstein's conviction for soliciting an underage girl
Speaker 1: for prostitution. I have a friend who I think it
Speaker 1: is a direct quote here. I have a friend who
Speaker 1: I think you might enjoy having dinner with. Her name
Speaker 1: is Arena. She will be in London twenty twenty four
Speaker 1: or twentieth to twenty fourth, Epstein wrote in an email
Speaker 1: dated August eleventh, twenty ten, to an account called the
Speaker 1: Duke quote unquote believed to belong to Andrew. Russia is
Speaker 1: a recurrent theme in the Epstein Files, including his claim
Speaker 1: that Bill Gates sought treatment for a sexually transmitted disease
Speaker 1: caught from sex with Russian girls. Gates emphatically denies this.
Speaker 1: I don't once again. It's like they're trying to show
Speaker 1: us all the stuff that the other people are talking
Speaker 1: about the Epstein Files, while throwing in, well, Russia's involved
Speaker 1: in totally, by the way, not related to this Bill
Speaker 1: Gates thing, but like Russia, it's like, all right, bro okay.
Speaker 1: In an email in November twenty ten, Epstein asked an
Speaker 1: unnamed recipient if they needed a Russian visa. In another
Speaker 1: email dated September eleventh, twenty eleven, an anonymous person discusses
Speaker 1: plans for an appointment with Putin when Epstein visits Russia.
Speaker 1: Spoke with Igor this direct quote spoke with Igor. He said,
Speaker 1: last time you were in Palm Beach, you told him
Speaker 1: you had an appointment with Putin on September sixteenth, and
Speaker 1: that he could go ahead and book his ticket to
Speaker 1: Russia to arrive a few days before you, the email stated.
Speaker 1: In May twenty thirteen, Epstein wrote in an email to
Speaker 1: Thorbjorn Jaglin, the Council of Europe Secretary General, that he
Speaker 1: wanted to help Putin and Russia reinvent the financial system,
Speaker 1: which again that was Epstein's thing, was finances and moving
Speaker 1: money from point A to point B. Also that month,
Speaker 1: Epstein sent an email to a hud Barak, which we've
Speaker 1: talked about that many times, the former Israeli Prime minister,
Speaker 1: claiming Putin tried to set up a meeting with him,
Speaker 1: which he declined. Direct quote. Putin asked that I meet
Speaker 1: him in Saint Petersburg at the same time as his
Speaker 1: economic conference. I told him no, if he wants to meet,
Speaker 1: he will need to set aside real time and privacy.
Speaker 1: Let's see what happens. That's what Epstein wrote to ahood
Speaker 1: Is talking about this. An email in twenty fourteen suggested
Speaker 1: another potential meeting with Putin direct quote, Hey, Jeffrey, I
Speaker 1: wasn't able to convince LinkedIn co founder Reed Hoffman to
Speaker 1: change his schedule to go meet Putin with you, The
Speaker 1: email from Japanese entrepreneur Joy Edo said. Another email suggested
Speaker 1: that The potential twenty fourteen meeting between Putin and Epstein
Speaker 1: was canceled after the shooting down of flight MHE one
Speaker 1: seven by Russian forces over Ukraine, killing all two hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety eight people on board. So you know, Putin
Speaker 1: had bigger fish to fries of that moment. In twenty eighteen,
Speaker 1: Epstein emailed Steve Bannon, President Trump's former strategist, about a
Speaker 1: meeting between Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, and Yagli.
Speaker 1: Epstein followed up by writing to Yaglin that Lavrov could
Speaker 1: get insight on talking to me direct quote. Epstein also
Speaker 1: claimed that he helped Vitality Chirkin vitally excuse me, Vitally Churkin,
Speaker 1: Russia's former UN ambassador, to quote unquote understand Trump. Churkin
Speaker 1: was great. He understood Trump after our conversations. Is not complex.
Speaker 1: He must be seen to get something that is simple,
Speaker 1: Epstein said of Churkin, who died in twenty seventeen. Christopher Steele,
Speaker 1: former head of the MI six is Russia's desk, told
Speaker 1: The Times Radio it was very likely that Epstein was
Speaker 1: in the pay of Moscow to gather compromat. Steele suggested
Speaker 1: that the link could have been developed through just Lain
Speaker 1: Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell, which okay, it's all about the info.
Speaker 1: It's all about the intel and the blackmail for all
Speaker 1: of the countries that were involved, I could see him.
Speaker 1: My understanding for my American sources is that as early
Speaker 1: as the nineteen seventies Epstein was effectively involved with Russian
Speaker 1: organized crime in Brighton Beach in New York and through
Speaker 1: them with the Russian Mission in New York, and was
Speaker 1: almost certainly recruited by them at that time. So they're
Speaker 1: talking about Epstein having some sort of Russian mafia ties
Speaker 1: in the nineteen seventies. That's an interesting take. Moving on
Speaker 1: to a later period involving probably Robert Maxwell in the
Speaker 1: nineteen eighties, it seems to me again that Epstein had
Speaker 1: significant ties to Maxwell. Well, no shit, Sherlock. When Maxwell
Speaker 1: was involved in getting Jewish people out of the Soviet
Speaker 1: Union in return effectively for laundering Soviet Communist Party hard
Speaker 1: currency and investing it in the West. I suspect that
Speaker 1: that's quite a lot of Epstein's investment money, or that's
Speaker 1: where quite a lot of Epstein's investment money came from.
Speaker 1: Steele added possibly the majority of his investment funds, which
Speaker 1: seemed to never have been explained, actually came from the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union. So we're going to dive in on that
Speaker 1: one on the culture conspiracy because we're doing the deep
Speaker 1: dive into all of the Epstein files and things. But
Speaker 1: I don't believe that it's a crazy hot take to
Speaker 1: say that Russia was using Epstein for the same blackmail
Speaker 1: operation that America was, that Israel was, that most of
Speaker 1: Europe was that. Yeah, I think at all it all
Speaker 1: ties together. There was a lot of fingers in that pot,
Speaker 1: a lot of them, But yeah, I thought it was
Speaker 1: an interesting one to bring up on this one. Now
Speaker 1: we're gonna finish off with this one here, uh defending
Speaker 1: the rights. Oh, I'm sorry, Uh, Burnley versus America, Burnley
Speaker 1: versus US. Demanding accountability on Caribbean boat strikes. So this
Speaker 1: is one that Tony actually brought to us before we
Speaker 1: started shooting this evening. So on October fourteenth, twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: the United States military carried out an illegal missile strike
Speaker 1: that killed Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaru, two Trinidadian men
Speaker 1: who were traveling by boat from Venezuela to their homes
Speaker 1: in Los Cuevos, Trinidad and Tobago. The American Civil Liberties Union,
Speaker 1: the Center of the Constitutional Rights, the American Civil Liberties
Speaker 1: Union of Massachusetts, and Professor Jonathan Hafetz of Seton Hall
Speaker 1: Law School filed suit on behalf of Lenor Burnley, mister
Speaker 1: Joseph's mother, and Sally Carr chorusing mister Samru's sister, seeking
Speaker 1: redress and accountability for these extra judicial killings pursuant to
Speaker 1: death on the High Seas Act and the Alien Torte Statute.
Speaker 1: So here's the summary of it. We just read the
Speaker 1: first thing that on October fourteenth, these two gentlemen were
Speaker 1: killed on a boat leaving Venezuela before the United States
Speaker 1: killed him. Mister Joseph lived with his wife and their
Speaker 1: three children in Los Cuevos, Trinidad. To support his family,
Speaker 1: he often traveled to Venezuela to fish and farm work.
Speaker 1: On October twelfth, he called his wife and let her
Speaker 1: know that he found a boat ride home from Venezuela
Speaker 1: and would see her in a couple of days. That
Speaker 1: was October twelfth. October fourteenth, his wife and mother saw
Speaker 1: social media reports of a boat strike. Fearing that the
Speaker 1: boat was his, they repeatedly called him, but got no reply.
Speaker 1: His family has not heard from him since. Like mister Joseph,
Speaker 1: mister Samru was working on a farm in Venezuela in
Speaker 1: the weeks before his death, taking care of goats and
Speaker 1: cows and making cheese okay. In October twelfth call with
Speaker 1: his sister, he told her he was returning home to
Speaker 1: Trinidad and would see her in a few days because
Speaker 1: his mother had fallen ill and he wanted to help
Speaker 1: take care of her. That was the last time Miss
Speaker 1: Chorus Singh or anyone else in the family heard from him.
Speaker 1: October fourteenth, attack that killed mister Joseph and mister Samru
Speaker 1: was part of an unprecedented and manifestly unlawful US military
Speaker 1: campaign of lethal strikes against small boats in the Caribbean
Speaker 1: and Eastern Pacific Ocean. These premeditated and intentional killings carried
Speaker 1: out outside of the context of armed conflict and in
Speaker 1: circumstances were where targeted individuals do not pose a concrete,
Speaker 1: specific and immediate threat of grave harm, violate domestic law
Speaker 1: prohibiting murder and international lawiting extradicial killings or the arbitrary
Speaker 1: or unlawful deprivation of the right to life. Through this lawsuit,
Speaker 1: plaintiff's Lenor Burnley, mister Joseph's mom, and Sally Carr Coorus
Speaker 1: seeing mister Samuru's sister, are demanding accountability for their loved
Speaker 1: ones death. Their lawsuit asserts claims under two federal statutes
Speaker 1: that entitle mister Josephs and Missus Samuru or mister Samru
Speaker 1: survivors to compensation and redress the Death on the High
Speaker 1: Seas Act, which establishes a cause of action for wrongful
Speaker 1: deaths occurring on the High Seas, and the Alien Torte Statue,
Speaker 1: which permits non citizens to bring suit in US courts
Speaker 1: for violations of international law, including the prohibition on extra
Speaker 1: judicial killings. Okay, so we'll see if they actually get
Speaker 1: their day in court. We will see, because and I
Speaker 1: know a lot of people were making claims that pretty
Speaker 1: much every single boat strike was innocent fishermen and it
Speaker 1: wasn't they had no right to hit them in all
Speaker 1: these things. When these he said that these two dudes
Speaker 1: found a boat ride, and I'm I don't know all
Speaker 1: of the ins and outs. I'm just asking a question. Here,
Speaker 1: the two dudes found a boat ride to Trinidad, or
Speaker 1: so they were told. Was this boat actually heading toward
Speaker 1: Trinidad or was it making a bee line towards America?
Speaker 1: First question? Second question, Once the boat was hit, was
Speaker 1: there any intel after the fact to identify that, yes,
Speaker 1: this was in fact a drug boat? And if it was,
Speaker 1: is it possible that these two innocent dudes like hitched
Speaker 1: a ride on the drug boat because they were just
Speaker 1: trying to get home and whatever the boat's carrying, whatever
Speaker 1: cargoes on this thing, that's no business of mine. I'm
Speaker 1: just trying to get home. I could see that being
Speaker 1: a very serious possibility, especially if, like working on the farm,
Speaker 1: they had a buddy of theirs that was also working
Speaker 1: for a cartel or something and told them, yeah, yo,
Speaker 1: you could just kind of stow away. I'll let my
Speaker 1: boy know and like you'll be fine. That's also possible.
Speaker 1: They very well may not have been involved in any
Speaker 1: kind of cartel thing, And it's very possible they just
Speaker 1: got caught up. They were like collateral damage. And if
Speaker 1: that is true, then it's very possible that the United
Speaker 1: States will cut a check. I don't I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm saying very possible. I'm not saying very probable. But
Speaker 1: we will see. We will see what happens with this.
Speaker 1: How long is this article? I just talked about the
Speaker 1: legal documents itself. I don't know, y'all. I mean, go ahead, Sam, Yeah.
Speaker 8: Sorry, I was doing I was looking at a thing
Speaker 8: while I go Did you know that doing all the
Speaker 8: bullshit over and like with Ice and the Epstein files
Speaker 8: going on right now? Did you know that in California
Speaker 8: they just now passed a thing, Well, you now have
Speaker 8: to pay taxes for every mile you put on your vehicle.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they're trying to force people to go electric. Oh
Speaker 1: did you hear that organ is trying to make it
Speaker 1: illegal to kill an animal?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Period brought up the fact.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and also brought up the fact that it's they've
Speaker 8: made it a fucking felony if you kill bigfoot.
Speaker 1: That's been a thing apparently since the eighties or nineties,
Speaker 1: which is great.
Speaker 2: I was the one.
Speaker 1: I was the one who bought it up with. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that still blows my mind. But now Orgon's making up
Speaker 1: to where like if you have a cow farm and
Speaker 1: you're trying to like harvest your cow for beef. You
Speaker 1: can't do it in the state of Oregon. And they're
Speaker 1: also going to make it illegal for you to sell
Speaker 1: the cows to go to a different state for slaughter.
Speaker 8: But yeah, it's okay for them to send uh the
Speaker 8: pills that kill babies across state lines.
Speaker 1: And yes, but but this.
Speaker 8: Is also the same people that say, oh, cow now
Speaker 8: is committed Uh, he should be in prison because he
Speaker 8: killed the pedophile to other people that already attacked him.
Speaker 8: Yet they say that Alex pretty well, yes, it is
Speaker 8: his god given right to carry a gun.
Speaker 1: I believe everyone should be carrying.
Speaker 8: But they're trying to pay him as if he's a
Speaker 8: good person, which it's ironic. On Dude's Facebook page, it
Speaker 8: says staying home saved lives.
Speaker 1: Which is kind of fucking ironic.
Speaker 8: If you would have just stayed home, the bash would
Speaker 8: still be breathing air right now.
Speaker 1: I don't know what that's got to do with Oregon
Speaker 1: in general, but all right, sure we can totally bring
Speaker 1: up Alex pretty at this time.
Speaker 8: It just the fact that they want to. It's the
Speaker 8: same people that are saying, you could do as I say,
Speaker 8: not as I do. It's good, but what's good for
Speaker 8: the goose is good for the gander.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I still do, as much as I look
Speaker 1: into the whole Alex pretty situation, I think that it
Speaker 1: was a weapon malfunction that made the round go off initially,
Speaker 1: because by all I can see, the agent did not
Speaker 1: have his finger in the trigger housing when he moved it,
Speaker 1: and you could tell that from the shadow. But it
Speaker 1: was a sig P three twenty, which is known for
Speaker 1: going off on its own. And once that happens and
Speaker 1: the cops are already tussling with him, he is obviously
Speaker 1: not complying. And they had already had an interaction with
Speaker 1: him the day prior where he like kicked out the
Speaker 1: taillight of a of an agent's car. So like, this
Speaker 1: dude has already known to be here for some issue.
Speaker 1: Maybe I don't think he was going there to kill nobody. Well,
Speaker 1: he had two fully loaded magazines, fucking And.
Speaker 8: The most worst take that Trump could have ever made
Speaker 8: to say on the situation, that is the worst argument.
Speaker 1: Evere it wasn't even him cash Ptel's dumbass had said that.
Speaker 15: Well, we think that he was there to cause mash
Speaker 15: casualties because he had two magazines when I carry I
Speaker 15: carry the when I'm carrying my snub nose, I mean,
Speaker 15: obviously it's got one cylinder in it, but I have
Speaker 15: a few extra rounds at all times.
Speaker 1: When I'm carrying my forty five. Dude, I have at
Speaker 1: least two mags on me at all times. That's that's ridiculous.
Speaker 8: At one point, I was carrying my nine meal with
Speaker 8: a magazine with that.
Speaker 1: I had my three eighty as a backup. I had
Speaker 1: two magazines with me on that one and.
Speaker 8: I was gonna and I carried Revolver in my boot,
Speaker 8: which no.
Speaker 1: Now, now I will say this. I will say this,
Speaker 1: although it is his right and it is completely legal
Speaker 1: in the state of Minnesota to carry, which it was
Speaker 1: Minnesota on it.
Speaker 8: Yeah, yeah, Oh, dude, he did not have any of
Speaker 8: the legal paperwork that he did not have his carry license.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, he did. He did, He had his.
Speaker 1: He had all the permits and all the things to
Speaker 1: carry concealed. Like your boy was absolutely righteous within all
Speaker 1: letter of the law to have a weapon on him.
Speaker 1: That is fine, and that I'm good with all of that.
Speaker 1: What I will say and again this is it's not
Speaker 1: illegal for you to carry a weapon to a protest
Speaker 1: by any means, it may not be the best judgment call.
Speaker 1: If you're going out there to hold up a sign,
Speaker 1: then like, all right, do you cool? If you're going
Speaker 1: there to impede on a which he said multiple times
Speaker 1: is what he was doing. The day prior, he had
Speaker 1: kicked out the taillight of a car, so he knew
Speaker 1: that there was a greater than zero percent chance that
Speaker 1: he was going to be getting arrested. He wasn't going
Speaker 1: there just to show solidarity. He was going there to
Speaker 1: get in the way of shit on purpose. And again
Speaker 1: he was legal to carry, but knowing that you're going
Speaker 1: there to stir the pot a bit, it is a
Speaker 1: really bad judgment call to carry a weapon into a
Speaker 1: situation that you know is going to be rather aggressive.
Speaker 11: That's also the fact that he if he was going
Speaker 11: to go there with the intent to do that or whatever,
Speaker 11: not saying to kill anybody, but just to be a
Speaker 11: dickheaded stir the pot.
Speaker 8: And attacking a federal an agent's vehicle is a crying
Speaker 8: and he just congratulations, you just you have that pistol
Speaker 8: and ammunition on you. You just made what probably maybe
Speaker 8: two three years you congratulate mandatory fifteen years now, because
Speaker 8: it is a mandatory minimum bar.
Speaker 16: If you had a possession of a farm on the
Speaker 16: commission of a crime. At least here is I want
Speaker 16: to say, to a minimum of tenures.
Speaker 1: Now, with that being said, let's take a step back
Speaker 1: in time slightly to Kyle Rittenhouse, the Kenosha kid. Right.
Speaker 1: He was carrying a weapon around a protest. Now, he
Speaker 1: wasn't a part of the protest. He was there to
Speaker 1: render medical aid to people who were getting hurt from it.
Speaker 1: And he was there defending a business because they knew
Speaker 1: that looting was a thing. Take away political ideations for
Speaker 1: two seconds. Whether on this side of the aisle, that
Speaker 1: side the idol a liberal, a conservative, or Republican, a Democrat, white, black,
Speaker 1: Take all that away for two seconds. Person A was
Speaker 1: carrying a weapon around a protest where he knew that
Speaker 1: shit was likely going to go sideways. Person B, just
Speaker 1: a few years ago, was carrying a weapon at a
Speaker 1: protest where he knew it was rather likely that shit
Speaker 1: was going to go sideways. You see what I'm saying here.
Speaker 1: A lot of people are trying to overly politicize this,
Speaker 1: which I understand with being the powder. Keg that it
Speaker 1: is right now. But again, Kyle Rittenhouse wasn't doing anything
Speaker 1: against police or against agents. This dude was specifically going
Speaker 1: there to do things to get in the way of
Speaker 1: an investigation or an effect of an arrest from agents.
Speaker 1: That's that we're having two different conversations, but so many
Speaker 1: people want to act like it's the same conversation. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of contexts and nuances that are making these
Speaker 1: two very they on the surface similar things drastically different.
Speaker 8: What they've already been shootings on ice agents al Eddie
Speaker 8: and last week there was a police officer killed in
Speaker 8: one of Robbins and just this week there was two
Speaker 8: police officers shot in Grenett County.
Speaker 1: One died on scene and the other one is still
Speaker 1: in critical condition. So like, right, but I believe it
Speaker 1: is your good.
Speaker 2: I was gonna say it is.
Speaker 8: It is your god given right to carry filums. It's
Speaker 8: also your god given right to protest, which I I
Speaker 8: I I am. I might not agree with with somebody's
Speaker 8: ideas and views, but I I will fight like hell
Speaker 8: from somebody to hold those ideas and views.
Speaker 1: Because I believe everyone should be able to do that.
Speaker 1: Alex did not reach for his weapon, which is also
Speaker 1: really critical to the whole thing. I am not saying
Speaker 1: that this was a quote unquote good shoot by any means.
Speaker 1: Is a really really shitty situation for everybody involved. And I,
Speaker 1: as of this moment, still am of the belief that
Speaker 1: it was actually the SIG's fault for the first round
Speaker 1: going off which led to his death. Afterwards. I don't
Speaker 1: know how this is gonna shake out. I don't know
Speaker 1: if any real justice is going to be achieved on
Speaker 1: this one. I don't know, and I do not envy
Speaker 1: any of the people that are involved in this right now,
Speaker 1: because this is going to go badly for everybody.
Speaker 8: Honestly, I can see SIG going from out from under
Speaker 8: after this.
Speaker 1: But that's the thing. SIG has denied any of the
Speaker 1: things around the P three twenty. Their official statement from
Speaker 1: their company says there's nothing wrong with the SIG, even
Speaker 1: though it doesn't take much of a YouTube shirt to
Speaker 1: show people with blank rounds will show you exactly how
Speaker 1: and why this goes down. It is an inherent problem
Speaker 1: with that weapons platform, but they're just denying that that's
Speaker 1: a thing, and they're still like they're tripling down on.
Speaker 2: That Brandon Hura.
Speaker 8: Hell, he did an entire video on Hey, this thing
Speaker 8: is a fun No, guns don't kill people, but this
Speaker 8: fucking gun kills people.
Speaker 1: There's a reason why law enforcement is not allowed to
Speaker 1: carry it anymore. There's a reason why the military is
Speaker 1: not allowed to carry it anymore. There's a reason why
Speaker 1: all ranges will not allow you to bring that weapon
Speaker 1: to their ranges anymore. But SIG just pretends like this
Speaker 1: is not a SIG problem. I again, I don't.
Speaker 8: Know what what What is the origin of SIG?
Speaker 1: Are they American? I don't believe now you're gonna make
Speaker 1: me google it because if you would have asked me
Speaker 1: this yesterday, I would have been able to tell you.
Speaker 1: But now on the spot, I'm not sure. Uh, SIG
Speaker 1: sour country. It sounds potty Germany, it does. It's Swiss.
Speaker 8: Yes, Oh so it's a fucking shitty version of a
Speaker 8: Swiss army knife, but in the gun.
Speaker 1: And to be fair, I do like SIGG as a company.
Speaker 1: I like a lot of the weapons they manufactured. They've
Speaker 1: always been solid. They got it wrong with the P
Speaker 1: three twenty, and they could have acknowledged that and saved
Speaker 1: face and had a big buy back or given like
Speaker 1: in store credit to the people that had bought one,
Speaker 1: or something like this. They could have done anything. They
Speaker 1: have just washed their hands and denied, denied, den make
Speaker 1: counter accusations and it's it's like it's it's not a
Speaker 1: good look.
Speaker 17: So it's the pre correct Yeah, all right, so what
Speaker 17: And I know that the P two two six was
Speaker 17: used by so common for a while.
Speaker 1: Correct, excellent, excellent weapon.
Speaker 8: Why didn't they just make the they keep the platform
Speaker 8: of the P two twos and just change not the
Speaker 8: not the twenty two, but the two two six. Why
Speaker 8: didn't they just like try to modify that, make better.
Speaker 1: I couldn't tell you.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: Tony just commented in the in the chat that SIG
Speaker 1: has Swiss, German, and American origins. They claim that all
Speaker 1: of the American sold guns from SIG are made in America. However,
Speaker 1: and I can't speak with authority on this one, but
Speaker 1: there's a lot of companies that claim that their weapons
Speaker 1: are made in America, and by that they mean assembled
Speaker 1: in America. Palmetto Arms is another great example of that.
Speaker 1: Most their ship's made in Croatia. But if the parts
Speaker 1: come from Croatia and are assembled in American because they
Speaker 1: have like an American affiliate, for lack of better words,
Speaker 1: they can legally stamp it as made in America. So
Speaker 1: I don't know if SIG is doing that or not.
Speaker 1: It's very possible an actual place.
Speaker 8: I thought that was like naughny, it didn't actually exist.
Speaker 1: Oh, no, Croatis real. Have you ever seen a picture
Speaker 1: of Croati's president?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: I just said no, look at president. Look at Croati's
Speaker 1: president in a bikini. It's worth a google. It's worth
Speaker 1: a google. Croatia got it going on? Dude, Wait, you
Speaker 1: actually didn't know that the Croats were real people? Sam?
Speaker 8: No, Oh you ever seen shark?
Speaker 1: Oh hah? Yeah, I told you it was worth a Google.
Speaker 1: Wait have you ever seen shark tank?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: One of them is from or his parents are Croatian immigrants. Okay,
Speaker 1: then yeah.
Speaker 2: So I'm assuming they're in.
Speaker 8: Well, they look like they'd probably be an upper like Europe.
Speaker 2: Are they round like the Swiss?
Speaker 18: And they're the Adriatic. They're between Slovenia and Bosnia and Serbia.
Speaker 18: So the Serbs love the Russians and the Croats love
Speaker 18: the Germans.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we're just learning out here today.
Speaker 8: Yeah, So do you think they would they would rather
Speaker 8: have a mos, like so the Submians, they obviously would
Speaker 8: walk with a MOS. And do you think the Croatians
Speaker 8: would walk with the car ninety eight?
Speaker 1: I feel like both of them would rock with an AK. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And I'm not just saying that because statistically speaking, that's
Speaker 1: the most widely used weapons platform and war. I'm saying
Speaker 1: that because both of them culturally, he can probably get
Speaker 1: down with some AK platforms. Stung it out.
Speaker 8: So Miss Colinda Gobo Kitovoviks Croatian President.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the Madam president.
Speaker 8: She is the first president of Croatia from twenty.
Speaker 1: Fifteen to twenty twenty.
Speaker 8: She was also the first woman to be elected to
Speaker 8: the office since the first multi party elections.
Speaker 1: And ninety nine. All right, got a gun from these people.
Speaker 8: Oh but they were Yugoslavia before they were this. I
Speaker 8: have a Yugoslavia car ninety eight.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there was some there are some stuff in the nineties,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. And and Croatia is now
Speaker 1: their own spot the fall of the USSR. Yeah, but uh,
Speaker 1: you know, she from what I remember reading about her,
Speaker 1: she did very well as the president of that nation.
Speaker 1: On top of being an absolute dime you know, good things,
Speaker 1: good things for them, God bless them, you know. But anyway,
Speaker 1: we're getting way off into the weeds about crazy shit.
Speaker 9: What you got, Tony, I got another kind of crazy story.
Speaker 9: When you started talking about the Catholic stuff earlier, I
Speaker 9: was wondering if this had come up and I had
Speaker 9: to drop. But there's this splinter group called the Society
Speaker 9: Saint Paul the Tenth that still likes to do Latin Mass,
Speaker 9: and they kind of split away from the Catholic Church
Speaker 9: and for a while, all their bishops are all their
Speaker 9: priests were consecrated by a guy who was a legitimate
Speaker 9: recognized Catholic bishop a long time ago, but he's dead
Speaker 9: and they just announced they're going to start ordaining new priests,
Speaker 9: which is going to deepen their schism with Rome. And
Speaker 9: it's just kind of odd to two traditionalist Catholics, the
Speaker 9: idea that doing the way the Mass was done from
Speaker 9: fifteen sixty four to nineteen sixty four is apparently not
Speaker 9: okay with Rome. And you mentioned earlier also, it's funny
Speaker 9: they're talking about reform. I feel like they're talking about
Speaker 9: reform all the dang time. They won't shut up about it.
Speaker 9: But that's just me.
Speaker 1: No, No, I think honestly they have ever since. Well,
Speaker 1: I don't think Benedict really saw reform, right right, John Paul.
Speaker 1: The second wasn't about the reform, you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: he was he was trying to keep things going in
Speaker 1: a pretty steady way. Benedict I don't think was really
Speaker 1: about reform. Francis was about some reform. He wanted to
Speaker 1: bring in the new age of Catholicism. And it seems
Speaker 1: like Leo is on that same vibe, and I saw
Speaker 1: it in the chat earlier. Apparently Leo's already mentioned that
Speaker 1: he's doing a Vatican three by twenty twenty seven, so
Speaker 1: I mean or twenty twenty eight, I think it was.
Speaker 1: I don't know how much of that is accurate and
Speaker 1: how much of that is kind of a misquoted or
Speaker 1: misunderstood fragments of information, but it's it's very interesting. And
Speaker 1: also to your point, I just found out there is
Speaker 1: one church in Baton Rouge that does Latin, Matty, I
Speaker 1: want to go to it one of these Sundays coming up.
Speaker 1: I'm pumped.
Speaker 18: I haven't been to one in almost ten years before COVID,
Speaker 18: But there were a couple in California, and my grandfather
Speaker 18: told me about a group called the Alka Shakirkha, the
Speaker 18: old Catholics, and I could not find any information about
Speaker 18: them on the internet for a while, but it turns
Speaker 18: out there's still a few. They split off in eighteen
Speaker 18: seventy after the First Vatican Council, Yeah, because they didn't
Speaker 18: agree with people and fallibility. So they were very traditionalist
Speaker 18: in many respects. But now they have women priests and
Speaker 18: gay priests and they're libtards. Now. It's like a conservative
Speaker 18: to libtard pipeline.
Speaker 1: It's very strange, the streamline in that regards only like
Speaker 1: one or two generations off. I don't know how and
Speaker 1: why it goes that hard that fast, but it does,
Speaker 1: absolutely does. Oh god, Sam, please chime it.
Speaker 8: I believe you just said there was harefc's being made
Speaker 8: in the Lord's house.
Speaker 1: Probably, yeah, I mean, to be fair, the Methodists have
Speaker 1: already been very open about females and gaze as their
Speaker 1: priests and things. Yeah, like they wear rainbow fucking stoles
Speaker 1: and ship what in't the Crystal Methodists. Yeah No, that's
Speaker 1: like that's a big thing that like they've they've made
Speaker 1: the news Crystal Math not to my knowledge at least,
Speaker 1: they don't act like meth heads. They every one might be.
Speaker 2: You know, it wouldn't surprise me.
Speaker 8: But no, So I know today that in your neck
Speaker 8: of the woods, there was just a guy, a police
Speaker 8: officer who had a worn out He was an illegal
Speaker 8: immigrant who had a one out for his rest for deportation,
Speaker 8: and he was a police officer and they still gave
Speaker 8: him a gun.
Speaker 1: Wait, I'm in Louisiana or specifically my area like New Orleans.
Speaker 1: Oh god, well yeah, that that actually checks out. That tracks.
Speaker 1: So New Orleans has been begging anybody can who can
Speaker 1: pass a background test and has a pulse please come
Speaker 1: be a cop. Like they are. They are in desperate
Speaker 1: need of cops, and they have been since Katrina. Honestly,
Speaker 1: that's why they offer uh signing bonuses, and that's why
Speaker 1: they offer like they pretty pretty decent starter pay as
Speaker 1: far as cops are concerned. I think it's been a
Speaker 1: while since I searched it, but I know at one
Speaker 1: point in time, like Baton Rouge City Police, just City
Speaker 1: not Shares City Police was offering a starting pay of
Speaker 1: like thirty two thousand a year, And granted that's with
Speaker 1: no overtime. That's very baseline boot level money. And I
Speaker 1: get that thirty two k is a lot of money.
Speaker 1: That's barely above the poverty line for the nation. Brother,
Speaker 1: that's a lot of money around here. Oh god, oh well,
Speaker 1: that's a lot of money around here. I'd be very
Speaker 1: curious what the cops are making in your area. But
Speaker 1: beside the point, so state troopers were offering about forty
Speaker 1: five at the time, and if I'm not mistake or no, no, no,
Speaker 1: New Orleans was offering fifty. State trooper was offering fifty
Speaker 1: five and this was initial starting pay. Now, I don't
Speaker 1: know what that looks like now. But see, New Orleans
Speaker 1: has two different sheriff's offices, which is also interesting in
Speaker 1: and of itself. They have a sheriff's office that answers
Speaker 1: to the mayor and they have a sheriff's office that
Speaker 1: answers to a completely different sheriff, and they work in
Speaker 1: unison with each other. But there's a lot of rivalry
Speaker 1: in that as well. And then there's parish things, and
Speaker 1: it's it's kind of a mess, and a lot of
Speaker 1: that goes back to old standing politics. But New Orleans
Speaker 1: has been in such dire need for cops. Dude. We
Speaker 1: just went to a Mardi Gras parade last week last weekend.
Speaker 1: I think this lady cop, she looked like somebody's aunt
Speaker 1: that had no business being in a police uniform. She
Speaker 1: got out of like a Honda Civic and she was
Speaker 1: just like standing on the street corner while a parade
Speaker 1: went by. But she had like the sheriff's vest on
Speaker 1: and the whole nine. They don't even have a police
Speaker 1: car for her to have. She's taking her own personal
Speaker 1: vehicle to these things. And it's like, yeah, ask New
Speaker 1: Orleans for you, which is why whenever people come to
Speaker 1: New Orleans, I tell them carry a weapon, protect yourself,
Speaker 1: do not trust the police to protect you, because that's
Speaker 1: not how that's going to shake out at all. But yeah,
Speaker 1: it's it's a thing. And so to say that the
Speaker 1: New Orleans Police Department had an illegal alien in their ranks,
Speaker 1: he had a pulse and capacity background check, They're not
Speaker 1: really asking much questions here.
Speaker 8: Honestly, I thought a background check isn't just you taking
Speaker 8: a pissed test, but FBI fiul, because every background check
Speaker 8: to like get a gun and everything, it goes straight
Speaker 8: to the ATF for and the FBI saying as.
Speaker 1: Long as he had no crimes under his name. Eh,
Speaker 1: but they're getting bold dog. Baseline pay for an officer
Speaker 1: lois rank is thirty four thousand, a corporal is forty
Speaker 1: two thousand. Is that in your neck of the wood, Sam?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Okay, I'm actually now I'm curious what baseline salary is
Speaker 1: for hold on here, I'm just type this in base
Speaker 1: salary Baton Rouge PD, and now I'm gonna look at
Speaker 1: I'm gonna look at New Orleans.
Speaker 7: Here.
Speaker 1: Next, baseline salary for Baton Rouge Police Department officer starts
Speaker 1: at approximately just under forty one k a year, increasing
Speaker 1: too roughly just over fifty k after one year. Okay, dope,
Speaker 1: Now I'm gonna look at base salary for New Orleans.
Speaker 1: This is you'll see the the difference is here. A
Speaker 1: baseline salary for New Orleans PD starts off just under
Speaker 1: forty seven k, and after one year of service this
Speaker 1: goes up to sixty three K or higher. Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're trying to entice some numbers, but they have been
Speaker 1: for quite some time honestly. Anyway, all right, y'all, like
Speaker 1: I said, I didn't really have a lot to go
Speaker 1: on this episode, but there were some things I thought
Speaker 1: were interesting enough to talk about, and yes I have
Speaker 1: seen did get brought up. But we're gonna do a
Speaker 1: more in depth look at all the Epstein stuff and
Speaker 1: we're gonna be releasing episodes, multiple episodes on that one
Speaker 1: on the Cult of Conspiracy. So I want to thank
Speaker 1: everybody for joining me this evening once again, for all
Speaker 1: the people listening to this. If you would like to
Speaker 1: join in on the conversation every Wednesday night at nine
Speaker 1: pm Central, go to the link in the description below
Speaker 1: too Cajun Night at Patreon or patreon dot com slash
Speaker 1: Cajun Night. There's only one tier for entry. We're just
Speaker 1: trying to grow this to be its own information sharing
Speaker 1: group that meets once a week to talk about the
Speaker 1: goings and comings of our day to day live internationally
Speaker 1: at the local level, all the things, throwing in some history,
Speaker 1: throwing in some religion. Again, I thoroughly enjoy my Wednesdays
Speaker 1: and thank all of you for joining us and making
Speaker 1: it what it is. Once again, everybody, I am the
Speaker 1: Cajun Night. I am checking out of this one and
Speaker 1: as always, God bless