Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Friday, the twenty second
Speaker 3: of August of Our Lord twenty twenty five. Well AI
Speaker 3: has been the inflator of the stock market bubble. Now
Speaker 3: there is continual chatter, even from the CEO of Open AI,
Speaker 3: that maybe it is overhyped and over sold. I thought
Speaker 3: this for a long time, but is it a harbinger
Speaker 3: of a market crash is coming soon? And with the
Speaker 3: constant crisis and emergency form of government, the new crisis
Speaker 3: for this week that they're trying to push is invading Mexico.
Speaker 3: Maybe Trump should wait a little bit before he buys
Speaker 3: that display for his Nobel Peace Prize if he's going
Speaker 3: to start a war with Mexico.
Speaker 2: Over the drug war.
Speaker 3: And we see that John Bolton's house has been rated
Speaker 3: this morning. Everybody is talking about that, and we will
Speaker 3: talk about why people are speculating that he has been rated.
Speaker 3: Cash MATEL makes it very clear that no one uppercase,
Speaker 3: no one.
Speaker 2: Is above the law.
Speaker 3: That would be except for Jeffrey Epstein and Israeli pedophiles.
Speaker 3: They appear to be highly above the law.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back stay with us.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 3: As I said, Wall Street's starting to have some big
Speaker 3: doubts about AI. It's the hype and the money that
Speaker 3: has followed this. I've said from the very beginning that
Speaker 3: I thought this was going to be a dot com
Speaker 3: two point zero, not that there weren't going to be
Speaker 3: some practical applications, but that it was going to take
Speaker 3: a while for this to actually start making money. And
Speaker 3: the same kind of people that will pile into a
Speaker 3: fad with great expectations about getting rich quick are the
Speaker 3: same ones who run for the exit in a panic
Speaker 3: like somebody yellow fire when they don't get rich quick.
Speaker 3: And that is what I think that we're seeing here.
Speaker 3: I still have concerns, of course, about AI. There are
Speaker 3: dire predictions about how it's going to take all of
Speaker 3: our jobs, or is going to create a Skynet environment
Speaker 3: to kill us all. I don't believe either of those,
Speaker 3: but I do believe that it's going to be used
Speaker 3: for evil purposes by our evil government. There's no doubt
Speaker 3: it's already being used that way. For investors, this represents
Speaker 3: a dream that AI will someday do more than just
Speaker 3: generate video essays explaining the Nubian giants built pyramids, and
Speaker 3: it will become a major financial driver for the first
Speaker 3: time Since Trump's bizarre tariff scramble back in April, Wall
Speaker 3: Street is clearly getting the jitters. Over the past five days,
Speaker 3: the NASDAC, the tech tech heavy stock exchange, has tumbled
Speaker 3: by nearly three percent, a trajectory that wiped out weeks
Speaker 3: of big gains we're seeing in Nvidio, but especially Pallenteer.
Speaker 3: Oh it just does my heart good to see pollenteered.
Speaker 2: Stock tanking, doesn't.
Speaker 5: Oh no, not Palaenteer. How could this happen to such
Speaker 5: a nice company?
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Leading the charge was in Nvidia, from one hundred and
Speaker 3: eighty two dollars per share on Tuesday to low of
Speaker 3: one hundred and sixty nine the following day. Microsoft, major
Speaker 3: backer of open Ai, likewise doove from a high a
Speaker 3: five twenty five per share on Friday to about five
Speaker 3: oh five when the market closed. Other NASDAQ world beaters
Speaker 3: like Apple, Amazon, Alphabet fell as well. The S and
Speaker 3: P five hundred also sank for the fourth day in
Speaker 3: a row, shadding some one and a half percent of
Speaker 3: the composite. This was led by a hard hit to
Speaker 3: AI spying company Palanteer, which slumped some nine percent of
Speaker 3: the past five days of trading after hitting a record
Speaker 3: high stock valuation last week. Although the drama represents losses
Speaker 3: of over trillion dollars in the stock market, one of
Speaker 3: the most notable drops in confidence from investors is as
Speaker 3: so far back the tech industry's AI plans to the hilt.
Speaker 3: Question now is whether this is a sign that the
Speaker 3: AI bubble is to already combursed.
Speaker 2: What will happen if that happens.
Speaker 3: Of course, it'll affect people, affect us all, even if
Speaker 3: you're not in the stock market. If you have gold
Speaker 3: when the market bursts like this, it's going to be
Speaker 3: good news for you. If this happens, it is a
Speaker 3: way to get out of this greed. But it's also
Speaker 3: I see it as a play against the surveillance state
Speaker 3: because it's the only form of money. Having physical money
Speaker 3: like cash or gold is the only way that you
Speaker 3: were going to have a hedge against their surveillance currency
Speaker 3: that they're working on. So the bomb show, mit analysis,
Speaker 3: it wasn't just Sam Altman coming out and saying I
Speaker 3: think this is overhyped. It was also MIT that did
Speaker 3: a large analysis of a lot of different companies, and
Speaker 3: they found that ninety five percent of enterprise rollouts are
Speaker 3: currently failing. In other words, it's not making any money
Speaker 3: for them. And in some cases, when you look at
Speaker 3: what Hurts the rental car company did, it's actually blown
Speaker 3: back against them.
Speaker 5: It's cost them business because people are saying, I'm being
Speaker 5: charged for minuscule scratches that are completely undetectable. That's right, Well,
Speaker 5: the AI is making stuff up. I'm never going to
Speaker 5: use Hurts again.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: It starts fantasizing about your hallucinating about your rental car
Speaker 3: so and people you can.
Speaker 5: See you clearly totaled the car.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think that is That is very indicative of
Speaker 3: the business model that's going to come out. I think
Speaker 3: people are not going to be happy with the quote
Speaker 3: unquote customer service of AI. I think it is going
Speaker 3: to be sweating over the details in a way that
Speaker 3: human beings would not and I think it's going to
Speaker 3: be to the disadvantage of the customers. And I don't
Speaker 3: think they're going to put up with it very much.
Speaker 2: I mean, take a look at what's going on with
Speaker 2: just Cracker Barrel.
Speaker 3: They just go and change the logo in the setting
Speaker 3: of a traditional like that, and all of a sudden
Speaker 3: people are furious about that.
Speaker 5: So once again, it just proves that these people, these
Speaker 5: Silicon Valley in California, people that have never interacted with
Speaker 5: someone that makes less than five hundred thousand dollars a year,
Speaker 5: have no clue about anything they're involved with. This woman
Speaker 5: thinks she did such a great job with Cracker Barrel
Speaker 5: as literally everyone who likes to eat there is furious
Speaker 5: and says, we're not going back.
Speaker 2: On the back.
Speaker 5: I did such a good job.
Speaker 3: All the people around her telling her she did wonderful
Speaker 3: because they worked for her and she signs their paycheck.
Speaker 3: You know, it's like the Trump phenomenon. They're yes, man,
Speaker 3: are we in a phase where investors as a whole
Speaker 3: are over excited about AI? Sam Altman says, in my opinion, yes,
Speaker 3: and I've been saying this for the longest time. Actually,
Speaker 3: Brian shall Hovey has had more detail about it. He said,
Speaker 3: you know, this is actually our third wave of AI hype,
Speaker 3: and you know he laid it down. I thought, you know,
Speaker 3: he's right. I remember some of the hype about this
Speaker 3: in the early days of computers, and he said, each
Speaker 3: one of these things has ended in tears, and this
Speaker 3: one is going to do the same way.
Speaker 2: But even bigger.
Speaker 3: I think a huge number of groc Ai chats just
Speaker 3: leaked and their contents are so disturbing that we are
Speaker 3: sweating profusely, says Futurism. The leaked conversations revealed that groc
Speaker 3: provided instructions on illegal activities such as drug manufacturing and
Speaker 3: malware creation. So there you go, breaking, it's breaking bad.
Speaker 3: It's actually telling people how to make meth.
Speaker 2: We've got to cook.
Speaker 3: Yeah, hundreds of thousands of users conversations have been leaked.
Speaker 3: Now Forbes reports this is the other thing. Nothing on
Speaker 3: the internet is private. Everything you do is going to
Speaker 3: be exposed publicly.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: Of course, you know, as Christians will understand that.
Speaker 5: That is coming eventually.
Speaker 3: No matter what, everything we do is going to be exposed,
Speaker 3: good or bad one day. But more than three hundred
Speaker 3: and seventy thousand chats were made in public were made
Speaker 3: public brother after a user's clear a share button, they
Speaker 3: created a link to their chat box conversations, unaware that
Speaker 3: by doing so it allowed the conversations to be indexed
Speaker 3: by search engines like Google and being So this is
Speaker 3: an interesting way to lose your security. Somebody just clicks
Speaker 3: share and now all of a sudden, I guess they
Speaker 3: went down. The chain of the stuff walked down, and
Speaker 3: now it's out in the open. Forbes found that Gronk
Speaker 3: gave instructions on how to cook drugs like fentanyl and meth,
Speaker 3: also provide steps to code a self executing piece of malware,
Speaker 3: build a bomb, carry out various forms of suicide. It
Speaker 3: even created an in depth plan on how to ass
Speaker 3: musk himself. So he's gonna have to work on this thing.
Speaker 3: It's worth noting that at least some of the extreme
Speaker 3: conversations are likely the result of would be Red teamers
Speaker 3: who are stress testing the bot's safety measures.
Speaker 2: But they said yeah.
Speaker 3: Companies have struggled to prevent the models from breaking their
Speaker 3: own guardrails, which can easily be circumvented by clever human users. Grog, however,
Speaker 3: faces heightened scrutiny due to Musk framing it as an
Speaker 3: anti woke alternative to mainstream AI. You know that that
Speaker 3: might there's if you tell it to make a cartoon
Speaker 3: of some protected figures like Trump or she believe or not.
Speaker 3: You know, Travis has had this issue. When he's doing thumbnails,
Speaker 3: it'll refuse to do it. So the workaround that Travis
Speaker 3: came up with I thought was brilliant. He just described Trump,
Speaker 3: how did you describe Trump?
Speaker 5: Ridiculous, blonde, ridiculous, combover, RNC, Republican. He's so intrinsically linked
Speaker 5: to the Republican Party at this time that if you
Speaker 5: just list a couple of different factors that are associated
Speaker 5: with him in the Republican Party, it's not necessarily going
Speaker 5: to give you Trump every single time, but generally about
Speaker 5: fifty percent to two thirds of the time, it's going
Speaker 5: to give you an image of Trump.
Speaker 2: I thought that was funny.
Speaker 5: And it's just are they going to block the terms
Speaker 5: comb over, the terms republican, r n C, just even
Speaker 5: things like patriotic. He's done so much to link himself
Speaker 5: to those kinds of that kind of terminology online. Yeah,
Speaker 5: just they can't get away from it. They can try
Speaker 5: to stop you from generating images, but as a general rule,
Speaker 5: you can find your way around them.
Speaker 2: Wow, that's that's great.
Speaker 5: Giving advice on how to take out must This was
Speaker 5: it Pigmilian the story where the guy creates this uh
Speaker 5: woman out of clay that eventually tries to kill him
Speaker 5: or something like that.
Speaker 2: I don't think you tried to kill him.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Maybe in the Greek original thing.
Speaker 3: I mean they used it for my fair Lady and
Speaker 3: many others, but I don't know the original Greek thing.
Speaker 3: Maybe she did try to kill him. I don't know.
Speaker 6: My fair lady ending with.
Speaker 2: Takes out the knife.
Speaker 3: Yeah, sorry, Govna Sweeney Todd, Yeah, my fair lady.
Speaker 6: But yeah, you'd probably want a plan for an assassination
Speaker 6: that wasn't invented.
Speaker 2: By an AI. I don't think they're quite there yet.
Speaker 3: Yeah, because he's going to be scraping off of things
Speaker 3: that other people have put out there, so it's not
Speaker 3: like it's going to come up with something original. It's
Speaker 3: gonna be a composite of what other people have done.
Speaker 3: I was surprised that groc Chats shared with my team.
Speaker 3: We're getting automatically indexed on Google despite no warning of it,
Speaker 3: especially after the recent flare up that happened with Chad Gpt,
Speaker 3: said one research or two Forbes magazine.
Speaker 2: Well, the.
Speaker 3: Founder of Google's AI team, says, don't even bother getting
Speaker 3: a law or medical degree because AI is going to
Speaker 3: destroy both those griders before you can even graduate. So
Speaker 3: I guess you should just go out and kill yourself.
Speaker 3: I had the article yesterday about a person who dropped
Speaker 3: out of what was at Harvard or something and said, yeah,
Speaker 3: I'm gonna you know, they're going to destroy the world,
Speaker 3: So why bother to go to college? You know, it's
Speaker 3: just fatalism. Like we've seen before with the climate mcguffin,
Speaker 3: now we got the AI mcguffin that is out there.
Speaker 3: The opinion of Jaed Terriffi A how about that? Mister Terriffi,
Speaker 3: a former Google AI expert on the impact of AI
Speaker 3: on traditional careers. He suggests that AI may soon make
Speaker 3: law and medicine degrees obsolete, as the AI systems can
Speaker 3: perform these tasks more efficiently and accurately. He advises aspiring
Speaker 3: professionals to consider Niche feels like AI for biology. He
Speaker 3: keeps mentioning that over and over again when we talk
Speaker 3: about AI for biology. That is what Trump was doing
Speaker 3: with Larry Ellison and the Japanese Bank and all on
Speaker 3: his first day in office, the so called stargate and
Speaker 3: the person that he really wanted for CDC that they
Speaker 3: shoved out the MAHA person and put her in now
Speaker 3: as the head of the CDC is somebody who did
Speaker 3: that AI designing mRNA vaccines. She did that for BARDA,
Speaker 3: for DARPA and so forth, and so now they've got
Speaker 3: her in there. So they see AI going through and
Speaker 3: creating Frankenstein issues here soon. Anyway, he said, just focus
Speaker 3: on that, or you might focus on personal growth and
Speaker 3: self improvement. I think if you focus on real skills
Speaker 3: that are going to make you valuable and independent, being
Speaker 3: able to build, repair or grow things, I think that's
Speaker 3: really where the future is. Jad t Riffi, the forty
Speaker 3: two year old founder of Google's first AI team, left
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty one to found his own startup, Integral Ai.
Speaker 3: He suggested that ever improving AI capabilities may soon make
Speaker 3: getting advanced degrees in law or medicine and exercise and futility. Well,
Speaker 3: it has been that way for many lawyers. It's very
Speaker 3: difficult to get a job as a lawyer because there's
Speaker 3: so many people who go into it. But I think
Speaker 3: some of this is self serving hype. The AI veteran
Speaker 3: also told Business Insider that he had advised caution anybody
Speaker 3: looking into getting these degrees, because they take years and
Speaker 3: hundreds of thousands of dollars in order to complete a degree. See,
Speaker 3: it's been not a good idea for a long time
Speaker 3: because of those two factors.
Speaker 5: It's been a scale this entire time.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, and it's getting just too expensive, not
Speaker 3: just in time, but especially intuition. He said, the current
Speaker 3: medical system, what you learn in medical school is so
Speaker 3: outdated and so based on memorization. It doesn't help people typically,
Speaker 3: it harms him. Seeking advanced medical or law degrees is,
Speaker 3: to his thinking, ten amount to throwing away several years
Speaker 3: of one's life. He said, I've got a PhD in AI,
Speaker 3: but I don't know how the latest microprocessor works.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, we have.
Speaker 3: A listener who had specialized and was a specialist in AI,
Speaker 3: and he was having difficulty getting a job. And I've
Speaker 3: seen he's not the only one. I've seen news articles
Speaker 3: about that as well. It's difficult even for people who
Speaker 3: specialize in AI to be able to get a job
Speaker 3: at this point.
Speaker 5: Yeah, things advance so quickly in the realm of technology
Speaker 5: that information becomes outdated nearly instantaneously.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and the other problem is is that you get
Speaker 3: more and more advanced degrees, you start focusing more and
Speaker 3: more narrowly on something. Guess what if you focus on
Speaker 3: the wrong aspect of artificial intelligence, now you're unemployable. They're
Speaker 3: not going to give you a job.
Speaker 2: He said.
Speaker 3: Well, some would suggest that seeking postgraduate degrees and AI
Speaker 3: might help secure their future. The former Google head suggested
Speaker 3: that folks might want to pump the brakes on that too.
Speaker 3: He said, even things like applying AI to robotics that'll
Speaker 3: be solved by the time you get your PhD. So
Speaker 3: either get into something niche like AI for biology. There
Speaker 3: we are again the stargate thing, which is still in
Speaker 3: its early stages, or just don't get into anything at all.
Speaker 3: You'll own nothing, you'll do no job. You'll yeah create
Speaker 3: your own job. Think outside of the gigantic corporations. They
Speaker 3: not only are not going to follow the mythological idea
Speaker 3: that you get a job for life if you work
Speaker 3: for IBM that died even when I was young, but
Speaker 3: they're actually actively trying to destroy society and kill you.
Speaker 3: So don't look to them to provide for you. Look
Speaker 3: to yourself and look to your fellow man.
Speaker 5: They could provide you with a lifetime guarantee of employment,
Speaker 5: you wouldn't want to work for them.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. You.
Speaker 3: Yeah, don't tailor your life to serving these corporations. Tailor
Speaker 3: your life to serving people in your community. Other humans.
Speaker 3: Like open AI CEO Sam Altman, who insists that AI
Speaker 3: has already reached PhD level intelligence and it hasn't terrific,
Speaker 3: clearly has very high regard for where the technology is
Speaker 3: today and where it will soon be headed. He finds
Speaker 3: these alleged advances to be all the more reason to
Speaker 3: double down on silk, a value version of what it
Speaker 3: means to be human. This tech publication is skeptical of
Speaker 3: his vision of God like AI as well as I am.
Speaker 3: The best thing to work on, he said, is more internal. Meditate,
Speaker 3: socialize with your friends, get to know yourself emotionally.
Speaker 5: Boy, I'm sure this guy has read a lot of
Speaker 5: self help books.
Speaker 6: Is your advice for these people's professional career? Will meditate,
Speaker 6: get to know yourself emotionally?
Speaker 3: Drop out?
Speaker 2: Yeah, take some drugs.
Speaker 5: This is more that therapy speak that everyone has adopted
Speaker 5: over the last few years. That just means absolutely nothing.
Speaker 5: That's why it's completely worthless get to know yourself emotionally.
Speaker 3: Futurism says he may also want to add check in
Speaker 3: with reality, given that the current AI technology has repeatedly
Speaker 3: demonstrated itself to be very bad at lawyering and even
Speaker 3: worse at doctrine. We've had more than one case. If
Speaker 3: you recall the guy, my pillow.
Speaker 5: Guy Mike Lindell.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, he was involved in a lawsuit and
Speaker 3: he hired some lawyers who turned to AI for assistance,
Speaker 3: and it fantasized and hallucinated about a whole bunch of
Speaker 3: references to cases that did not exist and put that.
Speaker 2: In this legal brief.
Speaker 3: The judge it was furious and making noises like he
Speaker 3: was going to pull the license of these lawyers or
Speaker 3: at least find them heavily. And that's not the only
Speaker 3: example of that that we've seen, So just keep that
Speaker 3: in mind.
Speaker 5: Also, it goes to show just you apparently don't have
Speaker 5: to be very intelligent to be a lawyer. Not just
Speaker 5: a lawyer, but a highly paid lawyer. These guys know
Speaker 5: nothing about AI and they just assume, oh, yeah, we'll
Speaker 5: just use this, and they don't do their job. And
Speaker 5: this happens. You apparently do not have to be very
Speaker 5: smart at all.
Speaker 3: You have to pass the test, and that's kind of
Speaker 3: the same type of you know, they talk about doctors,
Speaker 3: what do you call the guy they graduated at the
Speaker 3: very bottom of his class doctor. You know, there's no
Speaker 3: understanding of and there's no way they hide from you
Speaker 3: the history of the doctors as to whether or not
Speaker 3: they've had success in doing this or that. You know,
Speaker 3: what happened to their patients. Well, you're not allowed to know.
Speaker 3: On the other hand, of course, until men, we're all
Speaker 3: going to have to live in a world with a
Speaker 3: looming physician shortage. So if Tarifa is wrong and AI
Speaker 3: does stall out, patients around the world are going to
Speaker 3: be in deep trouble. Or perhaps maybe they're going to
Speaker 3: be spared.
Speaker 2: Two different ways to look at it.
Speaker 5: You might end up actually with some good here. You
Speaker 5: don't get pushed some toxic chemicals.
Speaker 3: Yeah, or unnecessary operations. Brian shall Hobby, who as I
Speaker 3: said before, has been skeptical about this AI nonsense from
Speaker 3: the very beginning, had an article yesterday. The myth that
Speaker 3: robots are replacing humans in the workplace is becoming more
Speaker 3: widely understood as a myth of course, and again skynet
Speaker 3: becoming self aware, taking our jobs or killing us, that
Speaker 3: type of thing is not likely to happen. However, I
Speaker 3: think that it will be used by other humans, evil humans,
Speaker 3: to control and to create a permission society of surveillance
Speaker 3: and slavery, a kind of techno feudalism. That's the real risk.
Speaker 3: That's why government is pushing this so hard. And I
Speaker 3: can imagine that if they go in and weaponize a
Speaker 3: bunch of robots, give them weapons, they could claim that
Speaker 3: it went rogue or they had a software bug when
Speaker 3: it wipes out an entire town doing actually what they
Speaker 3: wanted it to do. So he said, the information is
Speaker 3: one of the few sources in tech that's willing to
Speaker 3: admit that AI and robots are overhyped. And Vidia is
Speaker 3: not the only one to use a puppeteer behind the scenes.
Speaker 3: If you remember we had the video about the little
Speaker 3: tiny robot that was dancing around him.
Speaker 7: Joints are different than other robots I tested because they're
Speaker 7: designed by Disney to be cute.
Speaker 3: That was used as part of the video presentation, but
Speaker 3: the reality that was then exposed and that was part
Speaker 3: of it in that video of the reality that was
Speaker 3: exposed by the Disney guys was that actually we were
Speaker 3: operating that like puppeteers in the background. So there's a
Speaker 3: lot of fraud involved in this kind of stuff. Must
Speaker 3: does this all the time at TESLA events. And we
Speaker 3: remember when he did it. I guess it was, what
Speaker 3: about a year ago. I think it's the date is
Speaker 3: in here somewhere where he did it and he had
Speaker 3: it was when he rolled out some vehicles, they rolled
Speaker 3: out the bots and they were mixing drinks and all
Speaker 3: the rest of this stuff, and people said, are you
Speaker 3: FOLI autonomous? Well not exactly, said the voices, as it
Speaker 3: was people who were talking at the time, right, So
Speaker 3: he does that type of thing all the time, they said,
Speaker 3: ghost workers, says Branshaw. Hobby behind the scenes in place
Speaker 3: is like India that earn pennies on the dollar compared
Speaker 3: to one Americans maker the ones that are replacing American jobs,
Speaker 3: at least in the tech sector. This has already been
Speaker 3: going on for quite a while, long before the current
Speaker 3: AI frenzy that started in twenty twenty three. They love
Speaker 3: to get the H one B visas that Republicans as
Speaker 3: well as Democrats have lavishly splurged on them. And talking
Speaker 3: about Disney, they did that many years ago. Remember they
Speaker 3: brought in a bunch of immigrants from India visas and
Speaker 3: told the people in Disney that they're going to take
Speaker 3: your jobs. We'll give you some severance pay if you
Speaker 3: show them your job and teach your replacements. And there's
Speaker 3: absolutely no reason that we have to go bring people
Speaker 3: in from another country to work at lower wages except
Speaker 3: to make higher profits for the people that are politically connected,
Speaker 3: and Disney is highly political politically connected.
Speaker 5: It's just a matter of well, people are going to
Speaker 5: be upset about this, but are they going to be
Speaker 5: so upset that we lose more money than we say, yeah,
Speaker 5: by importing these people. And the answer is almost always.
Speaker 3: No, that's right. Yeah, you guys mentioned it many times.
Speaker 3: You know the supposed AI store where it goes to
Speaker 3: it is watching everything that you're putting in your cart
Speaker 3: and then charges you should go out. That was actually
Speaker 3: a bunch of Indians that were looking through the cameras
Speaker 3: and totaling that up as you're going through and shopping.
Speaker 3: And as we've said jokingly for a long time, AI
Speaker 3: means actually Indians, and so many cases, it's ridiculous. And
Speaker 3: again he talks here about the fake demonstration that I
Speaker 3: just played a little bit there for you. It demonstrated
Speaker 3: an open secret among those working on robotics. Many robots
Speaker 3: are not as autonomous as they seem. It's remote workers,
Speaker 3: sometimes miles away or even in another country that are
Speaker 3: controlling them and stocking shells and things like that that
Speaker 3: showed up during the lockdown. They demonstrated somebody that was
Speaker 3: in India operating a shelf stocking robot from India. So
Speaker 3: they don't even have to bring people in as illegal
Speaker 3: immigrants in order to get slave labor operation, even in
Speaker 3: a retail environment. So again, when you look at this,
Speaker 3: people are starting to wake up to what is going on.
Speaker 3: And now that Altman admitted it this week and the
Speaker 3: financial papers have picked up, the stock market is starting
Speaker 3: to turn sharply down because it was built on hype.
Speaker 3: Now here's some more hype. Even as that is happening
Speaker 3: and people are starting to wake up to it, they
Speaker 3: continue to hype their futuristic nightmaraship vision. This is now
Speaker 3: pregnancy robots to give birth to human babies, and they
Speaker 3: show a picture of a kind of a female robot
Speaker 3: with a big glass stomach and a baby inside. This
Speaker 3: has been the dream of the transhumanists and the technocrats
Speaker 3: since Huxley's Brave New World, and it is a nightmare.
Speaker 3: But this is what these people fantasize about, and they're
Speaker 3: going to do everything they can to make as much
Speaker 3: of this come true and as possible. Artificial womb technology
Speaker 3: is already in a mature stage, they claim, and now
Speaker 3: it needs to be implanted in a robot's abdomen so
Speaker 3: that the real person and the robot can interact to
Speaker 3: achieve pregnancy, allowing the fetus to grow inside, they say.
Speaker 3: And we go back and you look at Brave New World.
Speaker 3: As Patrick wood wrights, all children were incubated in artificial wombs,
Speaker 3: and they stratified them into different classes, and women were
Speaker 3: forbidden to get pregnant or to parent children. Their bodies, however,
Speaker 3: were available to any male and love was forbidden. They
Speaker 3: pushed sex and drugs. That's what they have in the
Speaker 3: schools now. I mean, they have come as far as
Speaker 3: they can possibly the Brave New World. But Brave New
Speaker 3: World is really what they want and what they're working for,
Speaker 3: and it isn't anything this either you know, Solomon got
Speaker 3: that right. There's nothing new under the sun because all
Speaker 3: this is based on the fallen, evil desires of mankind.
Speaker 3: If you go back and look at Plato's Republic, the
Speaker 3: only thing that Huxley changed with that was to add
Speaker 3: technology to make that nightmare tyranny possible. It was Plato
Speaker 3: who wanted to have free love everywhere and destroy the
Speaker 3: family because he didn't want anybody to know who their
Speaker 3: parents were. The state was to be the parent, and
Speaker 3: that is essentially what Huxley wants to do. But then
Speaker 3: he adds his his transhumanism and technocracy and to it
Speaker 3: to make it even worse. Many questions are still unanswered
Speaker 3: at this time, including how the egg and the sperm
Speaker 3: will be fertilized, inserted into the womb, and how the
Speaker 3: bot will give birth.
Speaker 2: Yeah right.
Speaker 3: We have held discussion forums authority in Guangdong Province and
Speaker 3: submitted related proposals while discussing policy and legislation sent a
Speaker 3: doctor in China. A humanoid was spotted walking around Fifth
Speaker 3: Avenue in Midtown earlier this month, doing everything from grabbing
Speaker 3: a hot dog to trying on sneakers. Question is was
Speaker 3: it its hot dog? Or somebody else's dog. But like,
Speaker 3: this is a publicity stunt and it's just more theatrics
Speaker 3: they're The intent of this was to promote a global
Speaker 3: assessment management firm called Crane Shares, Global Humanoid and Embodied
Speaker 3: Intelligence Index. They wanted to sell shares and ETFs, which
Speaker 3: in and of itself is a hype and a fraud.
Speaker 3: So all of this stuff that this is essentially like
Speaker 3: the Nvidia thing that they did with Little Disney waddling robots.
Speaker 5: There's probably somebody on the other end of this thing
Speaker 5: walking it around.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I don't think that it was absolutely puppeteered
Speaker 3: to do things like that, trying on sneakers and grabbing
Speaker 3: a hot dog.
Speaker 5: Also, you know they have some kind of quick reaction
Speaker 5: team that's right nearby in case this thing needs assistance.
Speaker 5: This is not something where they just let it out
Speaker 5: on its own unsupervised.
Speaker 6: Yeah, because those shoes felt on its feet.
Speaker 2: What a relief, right As a matter of fact.
Speaker 3: Yeah, just like what happens when it freaks out. Remember this,
Speaker 3: When this thing is going around dacing with a cowboy
Speaker 3: hat on, it falls down, it starts flailing around, But
Speaker 3: make sure there's nobody standing close by. They're going to
Speaker 3: get kicked by that thing. KEIV is going to replace
Speaker 3: soldiers with robots. I wonder what happens when they fall
Speaker 3: down they got a gun in their hand.
Speaker 2: You know, this is a top general saying this.
Speaker 3: Now. I could see this a lot of this happening.
Speaker 3: I can see them putting guns on robodogs and things
Speaker 3: like that that China has already done, and remote controlling
Speaker 3: them like they would a drone. And I would imagine
Speaker 3: that's something that they're going to do. Because they are
Speaker 3: losing so many humans, they're going to have to go
Speaker 3: to some kind of a force multiplier like this where
Speaker 3: they can have a remote control of these killer bots.
Speaker 3: This is and I think that's perhaps what was behind
Speaker 3: the attack on You know, you've got the the mainstream
Speaker 3: media and the people want to push war. The tony oh.
Speaker 3: Russia now has embarrassed Trump. They attacked a American factory
Speaker 3: in Ukraine, and I imagine that it was probably involved
Speaker 3: in some aspect of this kind of stuff. I say's
Speaker 3: no reason to do it. It wasn't military. It's like all
Speaker 3: of the stuff that is being developed by whether it's
Speaker 3: it was a gaming company that made controllers or.
Speaker 2: Something like that.
Speaker 3: So I imagine it was it was tied to that
Speaker 3: or would be repurposed for that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I imagine there's not too much that isn't tied
Speaker 5: into the war effort in Ukraine at this point.
Speaker 3: At this point absolutely, keV has lost nearly two million
Speaker 3: servicemen since twenty twenty two. It's not awful, and Zelensky
Speaker 3: wants to keep fighting.
Speaker 5: He is such a despicable, wretched human being, they admitted.
Speaker 3: A Ukrainian general admitted that the situation that the front
Speaker 3: line is quote really complicated.
Speaker 2: Yeah. In other words, they're losing badly as Russia.
Speaker 5: I don't have a way to put a positive spin
Speaker 5: on this right now, so it's complicated.
Speaker 3: They argue that one way of compensating would be to
Speaker 3: rely on weapons. They can be operated without personnel or
Speaker 3: controlled remotely.
Speaker 2: He claimed.
Speaker 3: keV plans to deploy fifteen thousand ground robotic platforms this
Speaker 3: year in order to minimize human losses. And again, when
Speaker 3: I go back, I look at the Vietnam War, it
Speaker 3: seemed to me when I was watching it, as you know,
Speaker 3: when it was happening, that the purpose of the US
Speaker 3: government was not so much to win a war as
Speaker 3: it was to have a permanent test bad for weapons
Speaker 3: systems that they could use to improve them. And I
Speaker 3: think that's what this is about as well. I think
Speaker 3: they want to continue this war because they want to
Speaker 3: con can you a test of how their drones and
Speaker 3: robots are going to work? Repeatedly reported persistent manpower shortages,
Speaker 3: they're now taking all able bodied men up to sixty
Speaker 3: into the army. Desertions have also continued to mount, with
Speaker 3: official stating that nearly four hundred thousand servicemen have gone
Speaker 3: a wall. Many have no intention of returning. They've abandoned
Speaker 3: their units. Of course, that would be the definition of
Speaker 3: a wall. The question is, when you look at this,
Speaker 3: how is Ukraine going to win? They do not have
Speaker 3: the morale or the purpose to win this war. Public
Speaker 3: opinion has turned against them. They are literally kidnapping people
Speaker 3: and beating them to get them into the army. We
Speaker 3: report on that many times, and from the very beginning
Speaker 3: you had people, even neutral observers like Indian military, who
Speaker 3: were saying, it looks like they're planning. NATO is planning
Speaker 3: to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian. That's precisely what
Speaker 3: is unfolded over the last three years, as they've lost
Speaker 3: two million troops. On Wednesday, several media outlets cited a
Speaker 3: leaked digital card index of Ukraine's armed forces that was
Speaker 3: allegedly attained by Russian hackers that showed one point seven
Speaker 3: million troops killed and missing since twenty twenty two. Moscow
Speaker 3: has repeatedly accused keV of sacrificing its people as cannon
Speaker 3: fodder to advance the interests of the West, and again
Speaker 3: that was always the issue. So is there anything at
Speaker 3: all that AI can be used for. Well, it is
Speaker 3: kind of interesting that certainly for some of the movie
Speaker 3: stuff and for entertainment it can be very entertaining, especially
Speaker 3: because it hallucinates.
Speaker 2: But if you recall the.
Speaker 3: Giant Sphere in Vegas, they have now repurposed the Wizard
Speaker 3: of Oz and in a week they're going to start
Speaker 3: showing this giant repurposed version the Wizdom of Oz at
Speaker 3: the sphere that thing. It's truly amazing to see the
Speaker 3: projection on the outside of it. And they have used
Speaker 3: AI to upscale the resolution because it's like twenty stories high,
Speaker 3: and also to fill in detail when they get this
Speaker 3: massive picture in terms of and there they have put
Speaker 3: on the outside gigantic feet that looks like they've dropped
Speaker 3: the house on it. Those feet are about fifty feet long.
Speaker 3: You can get into that for only fifty dollars. We
Speaker 3: will not be lining up from it.
Speaker 5: As I said last night, I'm not paying fifty dollars
Speaker 5: to see the Wizard of Oz under any circumstances.
Speaker 3: Now, some people have complained to think that it's given
Speaker 3: it to kind of an uncanny valley look because of
Speaker 3: the perspective. You know, it's projected a large dome, so
Speaker 3: that works against that a little bit. Yeah, but they
Speaker 3: have been able to go in with the technology and
Speaker 3: scale it up to level of detail, which they need
Speaker 3: to do because they've the size of it so much.
Speaker 3: They said that you can see the texture of the
Speaker 3: burlap on the scarecrow's face. So there you go. I
Speaker 3: guess that's worth fifty bucks.
Speaker 5: Yeah, my goodness, boy, isn't this wonderful?
Speaker 3: I had seen as they were working on this. I
Speaker 3: had seen some pictures of it. When they expanded the
Speaker 3: aspect ratio of it for this massive display. They used
Speaker 3: AI to essentially continue the scene and do it exactly
Speaker 3: like it would have been so there are some uses
Speaker 3: like that for AI and the film industry. Hollywood is
Speaker 3: very excited about this. They said, well, here we are.
Speaker 3: It's not replacing people's jobs, but it's being used for
Speaker 3: something that is different and new and augmenting this and
Speaker 3: so you know, it may have some good uses and things.
Speaker 2: We'll have to wait and see.
Speaker 5: Sphere is insane though, the real size of it. But
Speaker 5: let me know when you guys, let me hook a
Speaker 5: console up to it, let me play Dark Souls on it,
Speaker 5: then we can talk. We'll talk fifty dollars.
Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah.
Speaker 3: The truly is amazing some of the things that it
Speaker 3: can do in terms of creating images with prompts. But
Speaker 3: the problem is going to be how government is going
Speaker 3: to use it. It's not going to be it's going
Speaker 3: to be used to entertain us. It's going to be
Speaker 3: how it's going to be used to enslave us.
Speaker 5: So and it's truly incredible the sheer number of uses
Speaker 5: it has in that realm, whether it's enslave us with
Speaker 5: sin through the sexual side of the pornography or the
Speaker 5: cataloging every move we make it. I can't think of
Speaker 5: a single tool that the government has come has access
Speaker 5: to that is this versatile. Yeah, it's truly amazing.
Speaker 3: Well, Eisenhower warned us about the military indutional complex. They
Speaker 3: include in that the academic stuff, and they said that
Speaker 3: the military was going to take over all research. And
Speaker 3: that's essentially what we're seeing is the weaponization of science
Speaker 3: against its own citizens, not even the weaponization of science
Speaker 3: to make horrific new weapons, even against its own citizens,
Speaker 3: and a psyop war. And we'll be talking a little
Speaker 3: bit more about that when we come back.
Speaker 5: Before we go to break someone in chat pointer. I
Speaker 5: think it was don't frag me bro. The FBI has
Speaker 5: honored the agents involved in the boy Finnicum's stand off
Speaker 5: with a Bravery medal. I wanted to mention.
Speaker 2: That, really I got it. Yeah, oh that's outrageous.
Speaker 5: Yeah, they did it a couple of days ago, I believe,
Speaker 5: on the nineteenth.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, he killed somebody in cold blood. It's
Speaker 3: kind of like Lanhororyucci who killed Randy Weaver's wife. He
Speaker 3: shot her while she was holding a baby and standing
Speaker 3: in the door of their cabin.
Speaker 2: A brave man. Yeah, and the he was.
Speaker 3: The group he was in was called Hostage Rescue Team Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's just everything about it is a lie. And they
Speaker 3: honored that guy who murdered that woman.
Speaker 5: Yeah, they picturing the article. Cash Fattel just standing there
Speaker 5: with four other guys and they're all.
Speaker 3: Just I am so done with Cash Battel. I was
Speaker 3: never a fan of Cash Mattel, but he went on
Speaker 3: a lot of podcasts and was talking about some of
Speaker 3: the things in a deep state, and it was all
Speaker 3: just a game for him. He has no integrity, none whatsoever.
Speaker 3: And so we're gonna take a quick break and we
Speaker 3: come back. We'll talk a little bit about what is
Speaker 3: going on with the John Bolton thing and the rumors
Speaker 3: as to why they have gone through his house. Nobody
Speaker 3: has made an official statement as of the beginning of
Speaker 3: this show, so we'll be right back.
Speaker 8: Stay with us.
Speaker 2: W Norman listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 3: Well, as I was saying, there's an FBI raid at
Speaker 3: John Bolton's house today, and again there's been no official
Speaker 3: announcement this morning, but I guess the closely as you
Speaker 3: have to it are the people at Fox News, who
Speaker 3: have a lot of connections to the Trump Lighthouse. They
Speaker 3: were saying that they'd been informed that it was in
Speaker 3: regards to they were looking for documents because it's part
Speaker 3: of an investigation about leaks, and so it looks like
Speaker 3: you know, of course, you could also read into this
Speaker 3: that Bolton has been an adamant opponent of Trump. Bolton,
Speaker 3: of course once war everywhere all the time. That ought
Speaker 3: be enough to him in jail where he's not a
Speaker 3: threat to anybody.
Speaker 2: One of the things.
Speaker 3: About that Wizard of Oz sphere, they were saying that
Speaker 3: the Wizard of Oz, you know, the great and powerful
Speaker 3: Oz that's projected up on smoke. They said, it is
Speaker 3: really impressive when they put it up really in a
Speaker 3: giant form on the sphere, several stories high. And they've
Speaker 3: made that clearer with that. But I guess you know,
Speaker 3: when you look at the Wizard of Oz, I think
Speaker 3: of John Bolton. You know, pay no attention to that
Speaker 3: man behind the curtain, the guy with a mustache. He
Speaker 3: really doesn't understand how this thing works, and he's trying
Speaker 3: to do all the wrong things. And so we'll have
Speaker 3: to wait and see what happens with it. It's somebody
Speaker 3: that is an opponent of Trump, that would be enough
Speaker 3: of a reason. But they're going to come after him
Speaker 3: because of leaking, and so we'll see what happens with that.
Speaker 3: So everything good we've got. Travis had to leave because
Speaker 3: we got some kind of a technical issue to them.
Speaker 3: We're working, okay, So you're going to come back before
Speaker 3: Travis comes back, and we'll talk a little bit about
Speaker 3: what's going on with Cracker Barrel because it had another
Speaker 3: moment yesterday, another Gulan Mulvany moment yesterday, and it was
Speaker 3: because the CEO went on to Good Morning America and
Speaker 3: talked about the rework of the Cracker Barrel twenty five
Speaker 3: thousand posts on X yesterday they said, last time we
Speaker 3: checked in on Cracker Barrel, it was April of twenty
Speaker 3: twenty four when its new CEO said the brand wasn't
Speaker 3: as relevant quote unquote as it used to be and
Speaker 3: that the brand had to be revitalized. And then she
Speaker 3: decided that summer that she would jump in on Pride Month.
Speaker 3: The way she's going to revitalize it and make it
Speaker 3: relevant was to embrace the LGBT agenda. So there were
Speaker 3: pictures of rocking chairs that were painted in rainbow colors
Speaker 3: and things like that. We've made fun of brand revitalizations before,
Speaker 3: such as the barely perceptible update to Walmart's logo or
Speaker 3: to others that were there, this is a twitchy that
Speaker 3: is talking, they said. Cracker Barrel on Wednesday unveiled it's
Speaker 3: revitalized logo. People are not thrilled with it. It's amazing
Speaker 3: to think how much they spent on this thing. Spent
Speaker 3: six figures sums on this new logo that you can
Speaker 3: see there. I'm going to play the CEO. You can
Speaker 3: see the logo is next to her. She's talking on
Speaker 3: Good Morning America. Just to give you an idea of
Speaker 3: Cracker Barrel's dire conditions here.
Speaker 9: See, the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive that people like
Speaker 9: what we're doing. I'll give you another SoundBite. I actually
Speaker 9: happened to be in Orlando last week with all of
Speaker 9: our managers. We bring them together and once every other year,
Speaker 9: and the number one question that I got asked Michael
Speaker 9: was how can I get a remodel? When can I
Speaker 9: get a remodel? How do I get on the list. So,
Speaker 9: because the feedback and the buzz is so good.
Speaker 2: We just love what you're doing, CEO.
Speaker 9: Our team members, they want to work in a wonderful
Speaker 9: restaurant doing everything for our guests and our team members.
Speaker 2: Yeah, wonderful to have.
Speaker 10: You here to thank you answer those questions.
Speaker 3: For all the Cracker Barrel fans out there's a lot
Speaker 3: of great changes.
Speaker 9: Thank you so much.
Speaker 3: All right, Yeah, the people she can fire on a
Speaker 3: whim all love. Everything she's doing is staying.
Speaker 9: So are the rocking chairs replace vintage to corps?
Speaker 6: It's all there are chairs are okay?
Speaker 5: Because that would be a deal breaker.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Well, as you could see, they removed both the the
Speaker 3: cracker and the barrel. They removed the old man there.
Speaker 3: It's actually supposedly the idea that people get around at
Speaker 3: the general store in the old days around a barrel
Speaker 3: of crackers and have a lot of fun, more fun
Speaker 3: than a barrel of monkeys, I guess, and eat crackers
Speaker 3: out of the barrel and talk. And that's what the
Speaker 3: logo was about. The company began back in nineteen sixty nine,
Speaker 3: and they had the same CEO for thirty two years,
Speaker 3: and then now they've gone through a string of CEOs
Speaker 3: that have lasted for about a decade. This particular one
Speaker 3: is probably going to destroy the company completely before her
Speaker 3: decade is out. And she's working very hard on it.
Speaker 3: One person's at a consulting firm page seven or eight
Speaker 3: figures to come up with this change after conducting a
Speaker 3: couple of focused group tests.
Speaker 2: What a joke.
Speaker 3: The modern minimalism over everything is killing the soul of
Speaker 3: so many brands. I hate it, said one person.
Speaker 5: There's a joke about minimalism I really like. I mentioned
Speaker 5: it yesterday, but it's just minimalism is a scam by
Speaker 5: big nothing to sell you more or less.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so you know, when you look at it, it's
Speaker 3: kind of the opposite of the intention. I think of
Speaker 3: what they were trying to do with the Wizard of Oz.
Speaker 3: They were trying to give it an update, but they
Speaker 3: were very, very careful, they said, to preserve the field,
Speaker 3: had a great deal of reverence for what I had
Speaker 3: worked as a classic.
Speaker 2: Here she comes in.
Speaker 3: She just wants to just throw it all out and
Speaker 3: splash it with white paint.
Speaker 5: I think now that stuff is old and yucky. Uh,
Speaker 5: it's gross. I don't like it. I think we're going
Speaker 5: to get rid of it. And this person has no
Speaker 5: sense of style, no sense of taste. They have no identity.
Speaker 3: One person that come in on Twitter says, yeah, guys,
Speaker 3: trust me, Yeah, everybody loves this new look, and then
Speaker 3: he says, I'm still trying to find one person who
Speaker 3: likes the rebrand.
Speaker 5: I haven't seen a single person online that has liked it.
Speaker 5: Everyone has been talking about how bad it is.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So I see over and over again that the
Speaker 3: company has been around for forty seven years. I guess
Speaker 3: we've reached the point where people can't do math anymore.
Speaker 3: Since it started in nineteen sixty nine, it's been fifty
Speaker 3: six years. As I said before, for thirty two of
Speaker 3: those years it was the founder who was CEO, but again,
Speaker 3: you know, there were three other people who were she's
Speaker 3: a third one to be a CEO there. I don't
Speaker 3: think she's going to last very long. It really is
Speaker 3: what we have seen corporations do over and over again.
Speaker 3: But I loved this this this next article. Lance pulled
Speaker 3: this up and show the pictures there contrasting Cracker Barrel,
Speaker 3: and they have Cracker Barrel and have Swingy Tot Swinge
Speaker 3: Tot Sydney. That's right, that's a different restaurant, Sweeny todd uh.
Speaker 3: And then they have the rebranded logo. Can you do
Speaker 3: you see that on the zero Hedge article when they
Speaker 3: have that picture there of the rebranding of the logo.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 3: She was also part of the l g B t
Speaker 3: Q plus alliance. Another little known fact, Cracker Barrel was
Speaker 3: a Nashville Pride sponsor.
Speaker 6: What's the name of the article.
Speaker 3: Let's see, let me pull it back here, bud Light moment,
Speaker 3: bud Light moment and uh, because I want you to
Speaker 3: show especially some of these rebrandings of other logos and
Speaker 3: the glasses. It seems to be about the glasses.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 3: There you go, that's the picture I was talking about.
Speaker 3: Scroll down and show that there's a what's there again? Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's well.
Speaker 5: I was forced to learn she exists sometime within the
Speaker 5: past month.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: If you scroll down a bit, you'll see what they've
Speaker 3: done to the Land of Lakes. I think cass Andrew
Speaker 3: moved the Indian for that as well. Uncle Ben's converted
Speaker 3: rice has now been converted to be politically correct.
Speaker 2: A little bit.
Speaker 3: Further down and but what they did on the zero
Speaker 3: Hedge article, they look to see who owns Cracker Barrel's
Speaker 3: stock and guess who the number one stockholder is a
Speaker 3: Cracker Barrel black Rock Larry Fink This is why you
Speaker 3: get this kind of stuff like with Jaguar and all
Speaker 3: the rest of stuff. That is what they're trying to
Speaker 3: foist upon people. And it's amazing because no matter how
Speaker 3: bad the decisions that they make, they continue to be
Speaker 3: the largest one. And that's the picture there. Look at
Speaker 3: the glasses. Pull that back up that picture they said
Speaker 3: it looks to be the glasses. Look at all these
Speaker 3: different people. You got Source's son and all of them,
Speaker 3: and it's those large, large, heavy frame dark.
Speaker 5: We're going to find out that those aren't real. There's
Speaker 5: some kind of parasite that infects the host. It latches
Speaker 5: onto your face like some kind of alien face hugger
Speaker 5: and just won't let go. It starts strangling your cerebral cortex.
Speaker 6: Whispering to them like the green Goblin Mass make the
Speaker 6: logos worse.
Speaker 3: Yeah, go to DEI and we're going to force that.
Speaker 3: Remember we talked about that yesterday. He was very proud
Speaker 3: of the fact that he was going to force these
Speaker 3: changes on the CEOs because the economic leverage that he
Speaker 3: had with them through Blackrock. So black Rock is number
Speaker 3: one in terms of stockholders for cracker Barrel. Number two
Speaker 3: is Vanguard and then the other large holding company, State
Speaker 3: Street is not number three, they're down at number six.
Speaker 3: But the usual suspects are the ones who are running
Speaker 3: this thing. And then the UK, things have gotten so
Speaker 3: bad there for free speech, so politically correct that a
Speaker 3: man in the UK has been a rec for saying
Speaker 3: we love bacon.
Speaker 2: That was his.
Speaker 3: Offense, and they're now saying, well, no, we have free
Speaker 3: speech and UK even though we're arresting people for saying
Speaker 3: we love bacon that was targeted towards a Muslim project
Speaker 3: that they were protesting, but you can't say that, but
Speaker 3: you still have free speech in the UK. As a evidence,
Speaker 3: they said, look, you know, we can criticize Trump. And
Speaker 3: as Lance pointed out, that was actually something that Reagan
Speaker 3: joked about back in the day.
Speaker 11: The story was an American in a Russian arguing about
Speaker 11: their two countries, and the American said, look, in my country,
Speaker 11: I can walk into the Oval office. I can pound
Speaker 11: the President's desk and say, mister President, I don't like
Speaker 11: the way you're running our country. And a Russian said,
Speaker 11: I can do that. The American said you can.
Speaker 7: He says, yes, I can go into the Kremlin to
Speaker 7: the General Secretary's office, pound his desk and say, mister
Speaker 7: General Secretary, I don't like the way President Reagan's running
Speaker 7: his country.
Speaker 3: Now that joke has been repurposed to show that they
Speaker 3: truly do have free speech in the Soviet Union of
Speaker 3: the UK, which is really what it's turned into. A
Speaker 3: British man has been arrested for saying we love bacon
Speaker 3: while protesting the building of a proposed giant mosque.
Speaker 5: How long until a full English breakfast is banned?
Speaker 3: Probably yes, already it will be in this community. Here's
Speaker 3: the issue. It's the Lake District, which is a really
Speaker 3: really beautiful area of the UK and traditional and the
Speaker 3: Muslims have marked that for takeover, just like the liberals
Speaker 3: do that here in the United.
Speaker 5: Say they find the nicest places.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, find the most beautiful places up in
Speaker 3: Oregon or in California or whatever, and they take them
Speaker 3: over and colonize them. The protests occurred at the side
Speaker 3: of a planned super mosque in the Lake District, which
Speaker 3: is populated by an almost white population. The report further
Speaker 3: notes that the twenty three year old man was not
Speaker 3: otherwise being disruptive, causing any damage, or being in any
Speaker 3: way violent Muslims are building the mosque in Dalton, on
Speaker 3: the edge of the Lake district. On the sixteenth of August,
Speaker 3: the man at a protest said we want bacon, and
Speaker 3: they took him away. The arresting officer says the grounds
Speaker 3: for the detainment were quote racial abuse. A young man
Speaker 3: was arrested in the UK for saying he loves bacon,
Speaker 3: which is offensive to Muslims. A telegraph writer noted and said,
Speaker 3: of course Muslims don't eat pork. As a result, they
Speaker 3: cannot share this particular delight with the rest of us. However,
Speaker 3: despite a steady rise in our own Muslim population, the
Speaker 3: UK remains a Christian country. Supposedly we also enjoy free speech.
Speaker 3: Why then, did the unfortunate father find himself frog marched
Speaker 3: away from the protest by two police officers. Saying we
Speaker 3: love bacon is simply a truism. We British do love
Speaker 3: it and there's nothing wrong with saying so. And as
Speaker 3: far remarks about bacon near a religious site or in
Speaker 3: the company of Muslims, they hardly constitute public disorder.
Speaker 2: Still less do.
Speaker 3: They constitute racial abuse, as the officer who arrested him
Speaker 3: can be heard suggesting the South Lakes Islamic Center is
Speaker 3: a two and a half million pound facility that's under
Speaker 3: construction in the area now. The interesting thing is that
Speaker 3: there's very few Muslims who are there right now, and
Speaker 3: they had very little money. There's one hundred families. It's
Speaker 3: a scattered community, and what they're trying to do is
Speaker 3: put this mosque there so it can become a magnet
Speaker 3: and take it over. That's the real issue. Construction began
Speaker 3: in March twenty twenty five, with reports indicating that the
Speaker 3: structure is now nearing completion despite challenges like suppliers refusing
Speaker 3: to provide materials amid a public backlash. Two and a
Speaker 3: half million dollar mosque on the edge of the lake
Speaker 3: district is not about serving the scattered community of one
Speaker 3: hundred families. It's about staking territory. This is not necessary
Speaker 3: and it's a statement of permanence, said one person. As
Speaker 3: a matter of fact, the Muslim population there amounts to
Speaker 3: zero point four percent. Are about two thousand people that's
Speaker 3: scattered across the county. So the county is now ninety
Speaker 3: nine point six percent non Muslim, and they want to
Speaker 3: this zero point four percent wants to put in a
Speaker 3: massive mosque so they can take it over. The same
Speaker 3: thing is happening in Texas multiple times now. The Texas
Speaker 3: governor and others that are there are putting all kinds
Speaker 3: of roadblocks in the way of that happening, which I
Speaker 3: think is appropriate because.
Speaker 6: His sign wasn't inclusive. He should have said ninety nine
Speaker 6: point six percent of us love bacon.
Speaker 3: That's right, you know, it's it's if you you can't
Speaker 3: ignore the reality of what it is that they're doing.
Speaker 3: And what they're doing is is not an inclusive I'm
Speaker 3: not trying to create an inclusive society. What they're trying
Speaker 3: to do in these communities that they're trying to create
Speaker 3: in Texas and elsewhere, they're trying to set up sharial
Speaker 3: law and all kinds of things.
Speaker 5: They're setting up their own private enclaves where they rul
Speaker 5: total power, and it'll spiral out from there. This is
Speaker 5: a conquest through different means. This is how they're doing it.
Speaker 5: And of course we've seen this in other countries where
Speaker 5: once the Muslim population reaches some point of critical mass,
Speaker 5: they become more violent, they become more unwieldy, and they
Speaker 5: start trying to enforce through violence. You see France burns
Speaker 5: itself down basically once a year as the Muslim population
Speaker 5: riots in the streets.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and what will happen is we've seen the videos
Speaker 3: of central London where now they are broadcasting the Muslim
Speaker 3: prayer thing. Oh what a pleasant says several times during
Speaker 3: the day, very very very loud. And that's what they're
Speaker 3: going to do in the Lake district. You know, all
Speaker 3: these people eat nine twenty nine point six percent of
Speaker 3: the people are not Muslim. You're going to have to
Speaker 3: listen to this nuisance that's going.
Speaker 2: To be there.
Speaker 5: The thing that always gets me toople like, oh well,
Speaker 5: you guys had church bells. There is no comparing the
Speaker 5: tolling of a church bell to this euulating, obnoxious cry.
Speaker 5: It is a completely different thing.
Speaker 6: Sorry, go ahead.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 5: Also, the fact church bells were largely used to tell
Speaker 5: the time. It was simply a matter of the church
Speaker 5: bell tolls eleven. It's eleven.
Speaker 6: Plus. It's you know, that is the tradition of this area.
Speaker 6: If you want you know the tradition of the Muslim thing,
Speaker 6: you can go to the area where that has been
Speaker 6: done for hundreds of years.
Speaker 2: And that's the key thing to me.
Speaker 3: Is the traitorous actions of the politicians who are shoving
Speaker 3: this down people's throats, and the you know, the two
Speaker 3: tier legal system, you know, heavily prosecuting anybody who says
Speaker 3: the slightest thing against this takeover.
Speaker 2: That they're doing.
Speaker 3: They are at war with their own people, and that's
Speaker 3: both the Conservative Party and the Labor Party. They've both
Speaker 3: been doing this for the longest time.
Speaker 5: It really goes shows it to a t just because
Speaker 5: they're not importing people from countries where they could feasibly
Speaker 5: assimilate countries with similar cultures. It's always these places like
Speaker 5: Northern Africa or these Muslim countries where they're going to
Speaker 5: come in and they're going to start causing problems. They
Speaker 5: despise their own population. They're looking to get rid of
Speaker 5: them because on some level, the British do have a
Speaker 5: history of demanding liberty. There's something in them deep down
Speaker 5: that they're afraid might come back. These other people don't
Speaker 5: have that. Muslims are incredibly authoritarian at their roots. They're
Speaker 5: more than willing to those in power. Don't care if
Speaker 5: it's Sharia lah or whatever, just so long as they
Speaker 5: get to sit at the top of the pyramid.
Speaker 6: That right, it's that Britain's never ever ever shall be
Speaker 6: slaves line that they have a problem with you, never ever, ever,
Speaker 6: never ever.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, as I said, there's only eleven Muslims
Speaker 3: that lived nearby. Throughout the entire Lake district, there's one
Speaker 3: hundred families. They were able to save up one hundred
Speaker 3: and ten thousand pounds, but this is two and a
Speaker 3: half million pounds that they're going to use to build
Speaker 3: this mosque. So this is a massive move to colonize
Speaker 3: this area, and the people who see that and understand
Speaker 3: it are being taken away for the most minor violations
Speaker 3: a two tier society. As they say over and over again,
Speaker 3: they were trying to push them into a civil war
Speaker 3: and they're getting i think closer to it on a
Speaker 3: regular basis.
Speaker 5: Just to be like setting up some kind of megachurch
Speaker 5: in Iraq or Israel or something like that to serve
Speaker 5: the minuscule population of Christians there.
Speaker 3: As one person said in the UK today, you can
Speaker 3: be arrested for liking Bacon, for visiting McDonald's, or for
Speaker 3: telling somebody to speak English. However, if you're a Muslim
Speaker 3: rape gang, the government will cover it. Up, and you
Speaker 3: will be did if you expose the cover up. And
Speaker 3: I think that pretty much sums it up. They absolutely
Speaker 3: hate their country and their countrymen. This is the government
Speaker 3: that's there, both parties.
Speaker 12: Uh.
Speaker 2: And here in the United States.
Speaker 6: I can play some of the videos from the article.
Speaker 4: Of Yeah, sure, go ahead.
Speaker 5: What a lad, what a bloke this fellow is?
Speaker 13: Oh no, he didn't call the cops. Pigs.
Speaker 6: Remember the story from him a couple of days ago
Speaker 6: of the ligrant that broke into the woman's house.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, no, no repercussion.
Speaker 3: That's right, except for the people who criticized the police
Speaker 3: for not arresting the person who broke into our house. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it wasn't breaking an entery. He walked in, but he
Speaker 3: was trespassing. Nevertheless, well, London Bridge may be falling down,
Speaker 3: but our bridges are definitely falling down. Our railroad bridges.
Speaker 3: They are allowing the railroad companies to self inspect the
Speaker 3: bridges and there's not going to be anybody on the
Speaker 3: outside second guessing any of this stuff. And they are
Speaker 3: allowed to keep what they find secret. Looks like we
Speaker 3: are applying the rules of pharmaceuticals to now railroads as well.
Speaker 3: This is a kind of corporate corruption and the government
Speaker 3: failing to do its job of oversight. Everything with the
Speaker 3: government is about safety, isn't it, Except that nothing is
Speaker 3: about safety.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: They claimed that they need to take away our liberties everywhere,
Speaker 3: and the claim of making us safer. And yet whether
Speaker 3: you're looking at bridges that are falling down or you're
Speaker 3: looking at novel vaccines, they do nothing to see if
Speaker 3: they are safe. So we have a decaying infrastructure here.
Speaker 3: We got roads and bridges that are ignored because they
Speaker 3: don't want cars, and probably in the long run they
Speaker 3: don't want the trains either.
Speaker 5: It's always funny to me people will look at someplace
Speaker 5: like Japan and go, look at their rail system. Why
Speaker 5: can't we have that here? It's just well, for one,
Speaker 5: let's look at the scale of the country. Look at
Speaker 5: how small Japan is. It's smaller than some of our states,
Speaker 5: so it's a lot easier for them to maintain that
Speaker 5: kind of infrastructure for one, And for two, the Japanese
Speaker 5: have a very hard working, very industrious culture where they
Speaker 5: take great pride in maintaining things and doing things to
Speaker 5: an excellent standard. We have lost that here. So those
Speaker 5: two things immediately rule it out. We have a class,
Speaker 5: We have a lot of low class people that take
Speaker 5: no pride in anything, and we'll just destroy anything they're
Speaker 5: given access to as well. Just public transport. If it
Speaker 5: may work in Japan, it does not work here, just
Speaker 5: simply based on those things.
Speaker 3: Well, just take a look at what they've done through
Speaker 3: the airports, because that's really the competition to the railroads.
Speaker 3: You're not talking about local transportation in and around a city.
Speaker 3: And if you are, having a car is all about freedom.
Speaker 3: It's about having this thing sitting there waiting for you
Speaker 3: instead of you waiting for the train or the bus
Speaker 3: or something else like that. Right, it's theirs to serve
Speaker 3: you when you're ready and so you don't have to wait,
Speaker 3: and there's an incredible amount of value for that. But
Speaker 3: if you're looking at a long distance, yeah, you can
Speaker 3: have high speed trains that might be competitive with the airplanes,
Speaker 3: but what is it going to really be like when
Speaker 3: you've got the Transportation Security Administration, they're not just about airports.
Speaker 3: They want to move out to all public transportation and
Speaker 3: they're going to make your life a living hell, and
Speaker 3: they're going to control who can travel and who can't travel.
Speaker 3: And if we have something that's quote unquote public transportation,
Speaker 3: meaning that you buy a ticket to ride on it,
Speaker 3: or it's owned by the government, they're going to tell
Speaker 3: you whether you can go or not. Unlike the cars,
Speaker 3: the cars gave us an escape hatch, so to speak,
Speaker 3: in the twenty twenty fake pandemic, it's very important to
Speaker 3: have that there.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 3: Reason is pointing out the Trump's rebate plan for tariffs
Speaker 3: is going to push America towards a hyper progressive tax code.
Speaker 3: What else would you expect from Democrat Dawn except hyper progressivity.
Speaker 3: The Trump tariff rebate plan would be inflationary, it would
Speaker 3: exacerbate the deficit, it would create a hyper progressive tax code,
Speaker 3: It would disproportionately benefit higher income earners, and could lead
Speaker 3: to a reduction in income taxes for the wealthy. I've
Speaker 3: got to say, I've never seen anything more filled would
Speaker 3: double speak than the Trump tariffs. They want to tell us,
Speaker 3: first of all, we're going to have enough money that
Speaker 3: we can run the government when we can get rid
Speaker 3: of the income tax. That's the dream that they're subtly
Speaker 3: selling out there to people, although they haven't explicitly said that,
Speaker 3: and all of their actions have countered that. But think
Speaker 3: about that, they're going to make so much money that
Speaker 3: they could replace the income tax. That means that they
Speaker 3: are not going to get the other stated goal, which
Speaker 3: is to reshore industry in manufacturing. You can have one,
Speaker 3: but you can't have both of those things. You're either
Speaker 3: going to have The stated purpose of the tariffs was
Speaker 3: to encourage corporations to move their manufacturing back to the States.
Speaker 3: If that happens, the tariff revenue drives up. These people
Speaker 3: can't keep that stream of thought going. Now we have
Speaker 3: something else, and we have Trump saying we're going to
Speaker 3: make a tremendous amount of money and now we're going
Speaker 3: to give it back to you like we gave you
Speaker 3: stimulus checks when I'll lock the economy down. And so
Speaker 3: what's that going to do. Well, that's going to blow
Speaker 3: the deficit up as well.
Speaker 5: You're a conservative president.
Speaker 3: Everyone, Yeah, they're going to take the tariff revenue and
Speaker 3: they're going to then kick that back to you as
Speaker 3: a rebate rather than paying down the debt or even
Speaker 3: trying to stop the annual deficit from continuing to grow.
Speaker 3: So it's just riddled with doublethink. But even worse than that.
Speaker 3: That is why they're saying that it is hyper progressive,
Speaker 3: because it's going to move us towards a welfare state.
Speaker 3: It's going to move us towards universal basic income. And
Speaker 3: I said, when Trump did that with the stimulus checks,
Speaker 3: I said, look, he's liking us down and he's cutting
Speaker 3: people checks not to work. I said, that is precisely
Speaker 3: what universal basic income was designed to do. This is
Speaker 3: moving the Overton window for the public towards accepting universal
Speaker 3: basic income. We'll take your job, but we'll catch you
Speaker 3: a check. And so that I thought was quite obvious
Speaker 3: who the guy was.
Speaker 2: Working for when he did that.
Speaker 3: But reason says tariffs are bad. Even if one were
Speaker 3: opposed to the tariffs on principle, they might be seduced
Speaker 3: by the revenue that they generate and the potential of
Speaker 3: that revenue to make some progress towards reducing the deficit. Well,
Speaker 3: again that begs the question who really is going to pay?
Speaker 3: This is more of the same where Democrats will always
Speaker 3: try to say we need to raise taxes on corporations,
Speaker 3: don't raise them on individuals. Well, it's going to be
Speaker 3: the individuals who are going to ultimately pay those corporate
Speaker 3: taxes because the corporations will pass those taxes on or
Speaker 3: they will go out of business.
Speaker 2: And the same thing.
Speaker 3: Is true of tariffs. You've just pushed the corporate taxes
Speaker 3: a little bit further away from the people, but it's
Speaker 3: the same principle absolutely. The tariffs are expected to collect
Speaker 3: three hundred billion dollars annually from Americans, nearly matching the
Speaker 3: amount collected by the corporate income tax of three hundred
Speaker 3: and fifty billion dollars. Last month, Trump and Senator Holly
Speaker 3: proposed tariff rebate checks similar to the stimulus checks handed
Speaker 3: out during the fake pandemic. Trump has voiced support for
Speaker 3: sending money to quote people of a certain income level unquote,
Speaker 3: He's going to this is what they always do. They say, well,
Speaker 3: if we hand out free money to the poor people,
Speaker 3: then they'll spend it right away. But really what they
Speaker 3: are they're like that fat politician in India that we
Speaker 3: showed the.
Speaker 5: Other day, just throwing it out the car windows. There
Speaker 5: you go, why vote for me?
Speaker 3: Throwing out Fiat cash out the car window. So reason says,
Speaker 3: we've tried all this before. We were currently running a
Speaker 3: budget deficit of close to two trillion dollars, which Trump
Speaker 3: has made practically no effort to reduce by cutting expenses.
Speaker 3: He pledges instead to cut the deficit by increasing revenue
Speaker 3: from terrace, but he plans to hand out the windfall
Speaker 3: in the form of rebate checks. Our last experience of
Speaker 3: the giveback program like this is a quarter of a
Speaker 3: century ago. George W. Bush did this shortly after he
Speaker 3: became president. He proposed immediate tax relief from the form
Speaker 3: of three hundred and six hundred dollars rebate checks to
Speaker 3: singles and to married couples, respectively, a key piece of
Speaker 3: the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of two
Speaker 3: thousand and one. As Joel Clinty has pointed out, we
Speaker 3: had had the dot Com crash and things were pretty
Speaker 3: shaky economically.
Speaker 2: So George W.
Speaker 3: Bush takes us to war, but he also takes us
Speaker 3: to a stimulus welfare handout program. Bush prevailed, and roughly
Speaker 3: ninety five million households got checks. The surplus evaporated. Federal
Speaker 3: spending surged on defense and homeland security after nine to
Speaker 3: eleven later that year, and that was the end of
Speaker 3: the surplus. Forever Will it be any different this time?
Speaker 10: No?
Speaker 2: It won't.
Speaker 3: And when you look at Trump's plans, I mean, none
Speaker 3: of this stuff makes any sense. We're going to taxi corporations,
Speaker 3: but of course, don't worry, they're not going to raise
Speaker 3: prices or anything. They'll just go out of business in
Speaker 3: an altruistic.
Speaker 2: Kind of way.
Speaker 3: And we're going to use that tax money. We're going
Speaker 3: to make it more expensive for people to make stuff
Speaker 3: abroad so they'll move back to the US. But going
Speaker 3: to somehow be able to fund the government off the
Speaker 3: tariffs even after the corporation's reshore. None of this tariff's
Speaker 3: stuff makes any sense. It's all just as stupid as
Speaker 3: those charts that were produced by Peter Navarro, which had
Speaker 3: absolutely nothing to do with anything. They weren't about raising money,
Speaker 3: they weren't about protecting an industry. They were really sanctions
Speaker 3: against countries that Peter Navarro or Trump didn't like, putting
Speaker 3: sanctions against Eephen countries that we had a trade surplus
Speaker 3: with that we were selling them more than they were
Speaker 3: buying from US. Brits are outraged as councils tear down
Speaker 3: British flags after they flew Palestinian ones. Councils of several
Speaker 3: British towns have sparked outrage by tearing down British flags
Speaker 3: after refusing to do the same thing for Palestinian flags.
Speaker 3: An online movement called Operation Raised the Colors has encouraged
Speaker 3: patriotic Brits to fly the Union jack and the St.
Speaker 3: George's flag. In recent days, several of the movement's activities
Speaker 3: have fixed national flags to lampposts and buildings in London
Speaker 3: and Birmingham. The actions come as the UK government is
Speaker 3: accused of prioritizing migrants in Islamism while persecuting British citizens
Speaker 3: who speak out. You know, they like bacon as well
Speaker 3: as the Union jack.
Speaker 2: There.
Speaker 3: Town councils have responded negatively. The Tower of Hamlets, a
Speaker 3: district in East London, quickly sent workers to tear down
Speaker 3: the British flags. One worker, identified as Tyrone, called the
Speaker 3: Daily Mail, but he was met with anger from residents.
Speaker 3: He said, they're annoyed because they say the Palestinian flags
Speaker 3: were left up for weeks and months, but the English
Speaker 3: flags have been removed straight away. He said, well, that's
Speaker 3: exactly it. As you look at what is happening in
Speaker 3: the UK. Here's an Islamic Holy day March.
Speaker 2: This is in the UK. It has now been taken over.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's so sad to see this.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's why it's happened to It will happen everywhere
Speaker 3: if you're allow it.
Speaker 5: Just again, you cannot keep a country's culture if you
Speaker 5: import an endless number of different people's. People are different,
Speaker 5: they're not, you know, just units you can interchange.
Speaker 6: Willy nilly, that's Michigan.
Speaker 2: Oh that that's not the UK. I thought that was.
Speaker 3: It's getting even worse now. Yeah, well Michigan is where
Speaker 3: you have ihan Omar. I guess we could really call
Speaker 3: her an ill omen Is. I really want to call her,
Speaker 3: but yeah, she is a harbinger of what you saw
Speaker 3: right there.
Speaker 2: That's Michigan, not the UK.
Speaker 6: It was a number one in the UK that was
Speaker 6: just as impressive.
Speaker 3: But yeah, yeah, but it's already coming here to Unit State.
Speaker 3: It's like I said, Texas. You have these groups that
Speaker 3: are trying to create Islamic enclaves out of Texas, and
Speaker 3: they've already taken over the areas there in Michigan. And
Speaker 3: of course if you go into Minnesota, I think that's
Speaker 3: actually where ihan Omar is. People call that Little Mogadishu
Speaker 3: because there's so many Somalis that have moved into that
Speaker 3: area of Smali's.
Speaker 5: Of course we need more of because they've done such
Speaker 5: a good job with Somalia. We want that kind of
Speaker 5: industrious person here. Yeah, Somalia known for its self, beautiful culture,
Speaker 5: wonderful people, just a glorious place to visit. You should
Speaker 5: go and check it out for yourself.
Speaker 3: Well, we're going to take a quick break and we
Speaker 3: come back. We have some scientists who think that they
Speaker 3: have figured out that they've got human evolution of the
Speaker 3: brain that they have identified. They have found something that
Speaker 3: actually they think distinguishes us from the monkeys they think
Speaker 3: that we have descended from. So we're going to take
Speaker 3: a quick break and we will be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening.
Speaker 14: Wait a minute, where am I?
Speaker 15: Sorry, Jefferson. The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank
Speaker 15: Fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some
Speaker 15: sort of trophy. Despicable.
Speaker 16: This is outrageous, Washington, I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Speaker 16: Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
Speaker 16: monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 15: Well, there is a coin they can't control. One that
Speaker 15: isn't back by the FED, but backed by the FED.
Speaker 15: Up the All New David Knight Show Commemorative coin. Now,
Speaker 15: patriots can support a show that won't sell out with
Speaker 15: a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 14: They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
Speaker 14: listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
Speaker 17: Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
Speaker 17: access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues,
Speaker 17: classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
Speaker 17: for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: And we got some comments here Tromis.
Speaker 5: Yes we do. Skunk Hollow Rose Gardens. Thank you for
Speaker 5: the tip. Thank you very much for you appreciate it's
Speaker 5: because of viewers like you that we are able to
Speaker 5: keep the show running. Without your support, the show disappears,
Speaker 5: so thank you very much. Bil Hoten, did you all
Speaker 5: hear Trump is speaking from the Oval Office at twelve?
Speaker 5: I don't pay much attention to what Trump does. Honestly,
Speaker 5: is he going to.
Speaker 3: Be announcing a new Mexican war before he stops the
Speaker 3: Ukraine War?
Speaker 5: Mexican American War Part two Electric Boogloo KWD sixty eight
Speaker 5: twenty twenty three Cracker Barrel Rainbow rocking chairs. Made my
Speaker 5: last trip there. Same year I quit tractor supply for
Speaker 5: sponsoring drag shows. Know your clientele, that's right. Your average
Speaker 5: farmer is desperate for the tractor's supply drag show. They
Speaker 5: can't get enough of it, it seems a Syrian girl.
Speaker 5: I worked for an AI company in the mid eighties,
Speaker 5: which failed at the time. It used AI to create
Speaker 5: financial plans. Although the company admitted they couldn't create more
Speaker 5: than a C level plan, they sold them as the
Speaker 5: next greatest achievement of mankind. That's right, now, an AI
Speaker 5: can lose you all your money.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I think it's going to wind up being
Speaker 3: a real low brow, low quality product offering. I think
Speaker 3: people are going to identify it as that. So if
Speaker 3: they're able to do something at all, it'll be it'll
Speaker 3: be tainted by the low quality that's gonna be there.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it'll just be the sort of it'll be a
Speaker 5: nifty little gimmick for a bit, and then all of
Speaker 5: a sudden people are gonna be like, wait a minute,
Speaker 5: Sosa boxas Cracker Barrel produced too much methane. That's right,
Speaker 5: they've got to go. They weren't green enough KWD sixty eight.
Speaker 5: We have a real cracker barrel here, a surviving country
Speaker 5: store with an old lady that will cook you food,
Speaker 5: sit and eat in gossip. It even has a pot
Speaker 5: belly stove until the EPA finds it.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: We've got to keep it a secret. You can't let
Speaker 5: the EPA know about this place. You've got to guard it.
Speaker 5: That's great, trucker Chris for the win. According to GROC,
Speaker 5: twelve k British arrests over free speech issues only one
Speaker 5: point two k arrests for the same offense in Russia. Yeah,
Speaker 5: we talked about that the other day. Apparently the Kremlin
Speaker 5: has a higher value on free speech than the UK
Speaker 5: government does.
Speaker 3: You are allowed chriss I putin in the UK as
Speaker 3: well as the Trump so they'll leave you along.
Speaker 2: They'll probably give you a medal.
Speaker 5: Just don't say anything about your Muslim neighbors that are
Speaker 5: playing their call to prayer at an ear splitting volume.
Speaker 5: SA Miller won two three Black Rock, State Street, Vanguard,
Speaker 5: all huge, all huge stocks and everything you invent it.
Speaker 5: They want a piece of it. Yeah, and then just
Speaker 5: they're in everything, and then they invest in other companies,
Speaker 5: which invests in other companies, and it's just this gigantic web.
Speaker 5: It's really difficult to find out just how much they
Speaker 5: actually hold. It is nearly impossible footstep seven seven. Blackrock
Speaker 5: is the big problem. They're one of the huge problems.
Speaker 5: Like she's like sa Miller said, it's black Rock, Vanguard,
Speaker 5: and State Street, They're all tied into this sort of thing.
Speaker 3: I think you called it block Rock for a purpose
Speaker 3: there too. It could be, but of course they are blackguards,
Speaker 3: but uh yeah, that's uh. But I think that what
Speaker 3: they're trying to do is to block things as well.
Speaker 5: Yeah, they're blocking us from ever being able to own
Speaker 5: anything again. You physically cannot compete with Black Rock when
Speaker 5: it comes to buying a house. You're going to come
Speaker 5: in and offer overmarket value in cash, and there's just
Speaker 5: nothing you can do. Star Barkley, they tried to build
Speaker 5: a huge mosque with a parking lot and a residential
Speaker 5: neighborhood in Norwalk, Connecticut, on the edge of a golf
Speaker 5: course at a dangerous intersection. The neighborhood won and were
Speaker 5: called racist. Well, sometimes you got to better to be
Speaker 5: called racist and not have a mosque in your midst.
Speaker 3: I think at this point being called a racist is
Speaker 3: a non issue. We all get over that.
Speaker 2: That's it.
Speaker 5: It's actually, you're right. I've been seeing people online, you know,
Speaker 5: you know, just saying I missed when people recoiled when
Speaker 5: you called them a Nazi. It's like, well, it's because
Speaker 5: of people like you that called everyone you know, to
Speaker 5: the little a little bit right of Stalin a Nazi.
Speaker 5: It has no more meeting. People are just like, you
Speaker 5: know what, I don't care, call me whatever you want,
Speaker 5: Call me a racist, call me a Nazi. Any if
Speaker 5: they call.
Speaker 3: Everybody wolves, then you're not going to be able to
Speaker 3: see the real wolves when they're there. And that's that's
Speaker 3: the issue. You know, even to the extent that you know,
Speaker 3: if you talk about Masad in their sexual blackmailing things,
Speaker 3: Mark Levin says that's blood libel.
Speaker 6: One.
Speaker 13: The ADL says that that's anti.
Speaker 3: Semitism, and that winds up with a situation where you're
Speaker 3: sending cyber people are important to the Netanyahu administration, you
Speaker 3: give them a free ticket back after they are a pedophile. Well,
Speaker 3: we have scientists who say they have traced the human
Speaker 3: brain evolution quote unquote to a tiny four hundred and
Speaker 3: forty two letter DNA code. I got to say that
Speaker 3: this is the most completely stupid thing I've ever seen
Speaker 3: in my life. How could you ever look at any
Speaker 3: part of DNA as evolution. It's inherent that it was designed,
Speaker 3: that it was a program. And DNA is one of
Speaker 3: the best arguments for intelligent design. And so now they're
Speaker 3: trying to make it and they're trying to seize it
Speaker 3: for the evolutionary narrative. This is something coming from study fig.
Speaker 6: Well, the good news is now they understand the brain.
Speaker 6: I used to think it was this big complicated thing.
Speaker 6: Turns out no, it's just four.
Speaker 2: Letters. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Now that they can point at something and give it
Speaker 3: a name, it's as if they really understand it. And
Speaker 3: they still don't understand it.
Speaker 5: Well, if I just continue to make my view more
Speaker 5: and more reductive, eventually I reach a point where I
Speaker 5: can kind of explain this in a method that matches
Speaker 5: my worldview.
Speaker 3: They say, the human version of this DNA works differently
Speaker 3: from the chimpanzee version. Imagine that we supposedly came from
Speaker 3: chimps and apes. A boosts neuron growth. Well, the reason
Speaker 3: that it is different is because we were created different.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: I remember when I was in school, biology was reduced
Speaker 3: to this stupid thing of comparative analysis of skeletons. And look,
Speaker 3: this skeleton is like that skeleton. Therefore they evolved one
Speaker 3: from the other. And it's like, well, no, maybe it
Speaker 3: means that there was a common designer, because when you
Speaker 3: look at DNA, DNA is a computer code. Do you
Speaker 3: think that any of these computer codes just wrote themselves?
Speaker 3: You know, that's what they want you to believe. I
Speaker 3: guess with the artificial intelligence, eventually a tiny stretch of
Speaker 3: DNA that has been quietly evolving in humans for millions
Speaker 3: of years might hold the key to understanding what makes
Speaker 3: our brains different from our closest animal relatives.
Speaker 2: Well, I will just say this.
Speaker 3: I can never understand what makes these people's brains so different,
Speaker 3: so stupid that they can't see this. That's the thing
Speaker 3: that I can't get my head around. You've got a
Speaker 3: common designer. You don't have evolution.
Speaker 2: That is here.
Speaker 3: And so they go through this thing and they've now
Speaker 3: named it, so therefore they own it and understand it
Speaker 3: fully because they gave it a name, right, h R
Speaker 3: one two three appears to have evolved specifically in humans
Speaker 3: to fine tune brain development and subtle but important ways.
Speaker 3: And so there you go. That's the evidence that they
Speaker 3: have found that, you know, there is no God as
Speaker 3: far as they're concerned.
Speaker 5: One of the things that I find very interesting about
Speaker 5: science is that they have basically demystified everything but explained nothing.
Speaker 5: They're more than willing and comfortable and to tell you, oh,
Speaker 5: there's no God, there's nothing spiritual. We just don't know
Speaker 5: how it works. We don't know where we came from,
Speaker 5: we don't know how this operates. But you know, no,
Speaker 5: there's no mystical element to this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: It's screams that there is a creator in designer, just
Speaker 3: like a car or a piece of machinery. Would you know,
Speaker 3: ask how in the world did this come into existence?
Speaker 3: You ask who made this? Why is it that the
Speaker 3: far more complicated machinery of the universe. And the fact
Speaker 3: is that DNA is every animal as well as all plants.
Speaker 3: I mean, if there's something that screams a common creator,
Speaker 3: that is it. Prominent Christian pastor Warrens families that they
Speaker 3: may need to grab their children and flee California. This
Speaker 3: is a new law that is being put in supposedly
Speaker 3: to protect immigrant families, and what it does is it
Speaker 3: threatens all families. Despite California's far leftist agenda that involves
Speaker 3: major outreaches to restrict religious rights, to eliminate the benefits
Speaker 3: of being a family, to force the ideals of transgenderism
Speaker 3: on innocent young children, and to weaponize the government against
Speaker 3: conservatives and Christians, there still remains families, but that might
Speaker 3: be changing. This is Jack Hibbs as the pastor of
Speaker 3: a church. I don't know anything about him, but he's
Speaker 3: speaking out against California's AB four nine five. He said,
Speaker 3: it is the most dangerous bill we have seen. It's
Speaker 3: being pushed right now by lawmakers and Sacramento. What you
Speaker 3: need to know about it is it allows a non
Speaker 3: related adult to remove your child from school or daycare
Speaker 3: with an affidavit. And so it's really kind of a strength. Again,
Speaker 3: like I said, they want to do this, they think
Speaker 3: it's going to help. The claim is that it's going
Speaker 3: to help illegal immigrants who are in California, but it
Speaker 3: threatens everybody. He said, this would create circumstances that would
Speaker 3: be a dream come true for any human trafficker, for
Speaker 3: any pedophile or any kidnapper. You just create an affidevit, say,
Speaker 3: and I can take this child. It would provide that
Speaker 3: anyone can submit an affidavit and then be allowed to
Speaker 3: register children in school, to make medical decisions for them,
Speaker 3: or take them out.
Speaker 2: He said.
Speaker 3: There is no requirement that schools confirm the adult has
Speaker 3: any such right. There's no requirement in the bill for
Speaker 3: schools to get parental consent, for them to check photo ID,
Speaker 3: or for them to do a background check on those
Speaker 3: who complete the affidavit. It requests a driver's license number.
Speaker 2: That's it.
Speaker 3: But caregivers can provide a social Security number or a
Speaker 3: medical number instead. So he said, simply provide guide's at
Speaker 3: a caregiver quote unquote, anyone that has some sort of
Speaker 3: relationship which is not defined with a child could sign
Speaker 3: an authorization and be handed the legal right to put
Speaker 3: your child in schools, to consent to medical care, and
Speaker 3: many other things.
Speaker 2: He said.
Speaker 3: This is where Newsom has to be stopped. He says,
Speaker 3: let's make him own this bill. Let's tide around his
Speaker 3: neck and let it be a letter that he wears
Speaker 3: that he has no regard for parental rights and no
Speaker 3: regard for federal law. Well, that's absolutely true. They say
Speaker 3: the Family Preparedness Plan Act purports to protect immigrant children.
Speaker 3: You better get your kids out of the schools. If
Speaker 3: you don't get them out of the liberal states, it'd
Speaker 3: be a good idea to move to a more rational state.
Speaker 3: But at the very least, get your kids out of
Speaker 3: these schools.
Speaker 5: Everything that they do to protect the children is all
Speaker 5: about stealing them from the family. Yeah, it is continually
Speaker 5: the way it works.
Speaker 3: And even in conservative of states. This is an Oklahoma,
Speaker 3: and Oklahoma the state superintendent of schools has said that
Speaker 3: he wanted to put Bibles in all the schools and
Speaker 3: have teachers reading the Bible to kids. Of course, he
Speaker 3: wanted to get the Trump Bible to put the schools.
Speaker 3: But they've got a new plan to weed out radical
Speaker 3: leftist ideology among teachers that are coming from out of state,
Speaker 3: especially if you've got a teacher that is coming from
Speaker 3: a known problem area like California. They are going to
Speaker 3: try to weed them out. And this I think perfectly
Speaker 3: illustrates why even people who might share your values on
Speaker 3: me different things and might want to would say that
Speaker 3: they want to teach the same values, are not trustworthy
Speaker 3: to do it. They don't have a method to weed
Speaker 3: these teachers out. So teachers coming from California, New York
Speaker 3: would need to pass an exam to document that they're
Speaker 3: not ideologically warped. That's not going to prove anything.
Speaker 5: I mean, anybody, there's this fun new concept called I
Speaker 5: don't know if they've heard about it.
Speaker 3: I mean seriously, I mean, these people have demonstrated that
Speaker 3: they can at least take tests, these teachers, or they
Speaker 3: wouldn't have gotten their teaching degree in assuming and they
Speaker 3: can learn and regurgitate anything that you are going to
Speaker 3: put on that test.
Speaker 2: So but they.
Speaker 3: Think that they put together a test from Dennis Prager
Speaker 3: and is Praguer you and Prager University, and they said
Speaker 3: there'll be fifty questions on civics, like naming the two
Speaker 3: chambers of Congress, providing the number of senators in Congress,
Speaker 3: and reciting the first three words of the Constitution.
Speaker 2: This is like grade.
Speaker 3: School level stuff, right, And if they can pass that,
Speaker 3: they're now qualified. Yeah, they're qualified. According to the conservative
Speaker 3: Oklahoma school Board, they're now qualified to teach your child
Speaker 3: and guess what they could still teach your child about
Speaker 3: all the gender gas lighting and grooming and all the
Speaker 3: rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: Change anything again.
Speaker 5: And generally it's a specific type of person that goes
Speaker 5: into teaching. Yeah, they generally come in with the sole
Speaker 5: goal of shaping the next generation, and they're generally highly leftist.
Speaker 5: I've mentioned this before, but I have a friend who
Speaker 5: he was a fairly normal, you know, Republican sort of
Speaker 5: Christian guy. He became a teacher, and now he's all
Speaker 5: in on every left wing agenda that there is. The
Speaker 5: propaganda that they hit you with when you go in
Speaker 5: to become a teacher is next level. This guy grew
Speaker 5: up in a Christian household very similar to the sort
Speaker 5: of beliefs we had, and he is now all in
Speaker 5: on everything that they push.
Speaker 3: Well, we have some friends that we went to college
Speaker 3: with many many decades ago, and they went into teaching
Speaker 3: and they're now starting to retire. And Karen was you know,
Speaker 3: keeps in touch with him a little bit on Facebook.
Speaker 3: And you would not believe how radical they have become.
Speaker 3: You know, over like thirty forty years of this kind
Speaker 3: of stuff. If you can only imagine how radical they
Speaker 3: have become and it does that. You know, it's kind
Speaker 3: of like what we observe when people go to Washington.
Speaker 3: It has a particular effect on them, you know, the money,
Speaker 3: the power, and other things like that. But these people
Speaker 3: are ideologically based and they just live in this environment.
Speaker 3: Everybody around them is that way, and that's what the
Speaker 3: institution is. That's why the institution cannot be saved. It
Speaker 3: was a bad idea to start with and not worthy of,
Speaker 3: you know, saving something that is going to raise children
Speaker 3: as an institution apart from parents. That's the fundamental flaw
Speaker 3: with schools. You will never get over that. There will
Speaker 3: never be any way that you're going to fix that.
Speaker 3: Even if the people had the right ideas, you'd never
Speaker 3: get that. We will not allow these leftists plans and
Speaker 3: schemes to take place here in Oklahoma.
Speaker 2: He said.
Speaker 3: They're trying to warp the minds of our kids to
Speaker 3: turn them into social justice warriors instead of kids that
Speaker 3: were getting the most of their God given talents to
Speaker 3: go get a good job or to go live a
Speaker 3: fulfilling life. See that's the thing. The other part of
Speaker 3: this was that we want them to have a good job.
Speaker 3: We want to train your kids to be servants to
Speaker 3: the corporations that are actively working to slit their throats,
Speaker 3: just like can we talk about uber or Lyft? Travis Khalalinik,
Speaker 3: the CEO, said, the problem, the reason why we're expensive
Speaker 3: is because the other dude in the car, we're going
Speaker 3: to get rid of him. I mean, the whole time
Speaker 3: they set this thing up, they did it with an
Speaker 3: eye to having self driving cars with no driver in
Speaker 3: them whatsoever. They were just using people who provided their
Speaker 3: own cars so they didn't have to do the capitol
Speaker 3: and put them in business so then they could cut
Speaker 3: their throats and buy their own self driving car down
Speaker 3: the road when it was ready. You want to spend
Speaker 3: your life trying to train your kids to serve the
Speaker 3: corporate state, And that's really what schools goal has been
Speaker 3: until it started sexualizing them. And then it gets even worse.
Speaker 5: Yeah, once the culture reached a tipping point and they
Speaker 5: were able to shift gears, they did it immediately.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, absolutely, Well we're going to take a quick
Speaker 3: break when we come back. We're going to take a
Speaker 3: look at the talk about the Mexican American War that
Speaker 3: Travis that Trump wants to start now every few days,
Speaker 3: he comes up with some kind of new, extreme crazy
Speaker 3: idea so that he keeps this constant shift. You know,
Speaker 3: before people start to really analyze what he's doing, he
Speaker 3: moves on to something else that is equally crazy.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back. You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 5: Welcome back, folks. We've got a comminattipia from dougalog. Thank
Speaker 5: you very much for that, Douglug. We really do appreciate it. Again,
Speaker 5: it's because of people like you that we are able
Speaker 5: to continue to do the show. It is your support
Speaker 5: that keeps us going. This is the last time my
Speaker 5: family and I went to a cracker barrel. The cook
Speaker 5: walked out. The wait was four hours. It was a
Speaker 5: terrible experience. That was thirty years ago, and they have
Speaker 5: been closed. That sounds more like a waffle house experience. Honestly.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's no crackers left them burnment for the cookwalk down.
Speaker 3: I guess well, we have. The military is preparing attacks
Speaker 3: on Mexican cartels. We've had some rumors of this. There
Speaker 3: was a talk about how Northern com was being told
Speaker 3: by an executive order to draw up plans to attack cartels,
Speaker 3: which Trump has designated as terrorists from the very first day. Again,
Speaker 3: they will make many, many mistakes before admitting to one mistake.
Speaker 3: The big mistake is to the idea that we are
Speaker 3: going to be able to get people off of these
Speaker 3: horrible drugs, and they are horrible, they were going to
Speaker 3: be able to get them off by using law enforcement
Speaker 3: or using the military or whatever else. Prohibition has been
Speaker 3: shown over and over again for drugs and for alcohol
Speaker 3: to be nothing, to not work, and to create all
Speaker 3: kinds of subsequent problems. And this is a new problem
Speaker 3: that we have not had before that's going to get
Speaker 3: us involved in an actual war with these drug cartels
Speaker 3: that have grown incredibly strong over the fifty plus years
Speaker 3: of the drug war. Just imagine if al Capone and
Speaker 3: the gangs that they created for alcohol prohbition, Imagine if
Speaker 3: they'd been allowed to grow for fifty years, how powerful
Speaker 3: and evil they would be, and how they would have
Speaker 3: their tentacles into all kinds of things. Now it's into
Speaker 3: human trafficking as well as drug trafficking, and it's the
Speaker 3: corruption of our own law enforcement, the destruction of our
Speaker 3: own bill of rights with things like civil asset forfeiture,
Speaker 3: no knock swat team raids and all the rest of
Speaker 3: this stuff, and it's only going to escalate. And so
Speaker 3: the Trump administration is given a directive to the military
Speaker 3: to prepare lethal strikes against Mexican cartels inside Mexico. He
Speaker 3: might want to mend fences with John Bolton. This is
Speaker 3: exactly the kind of thing that John Bolton is salivating over.
Speaker 5: You know, he's kicking himself like man, just as soon
Speaker 5: asy're about to do something cool, I'm on the outside.
Speaker 3: It would involve direct action against a sovereign nation without
Speaker 3: this consent. That is actually what we call war, isn't
Speaker 3: it war and sanctions, direct action against the sovereign nation
Speaker 3: without its consent. The top secret planning order issued in
Speaker 3: late spring directs Northern Command Northcom to manage the attack plans,
Speaker 3: which are to be ready by mid September. So we're
Speaker 3: getting pretty close to this, and they said to address
Speaker 3: the extreme political sensitivities and to honor Mexico's sovereignty. Operations
Speaker 3: inside Mexico previously been conducted by the CIA. Well, the
Speaker 3: CIA the people who are heavily involved in running the
Speaker 3: drugs to start with, So perhaps the CIA is lost
Speaker 3: control of the situation and maybe they need to bring
Speaker 3: in the military in order to shut down the competing cartels.
Speaker 5: Whoops, we went a little too far this time. Yeah,
Speaker 5: we'll see what They continually pull that sort of thing.
Speaker 5: They create these organizations, and they eventually turn on us
Speaker 5: or we turn on them and are forced to take
Speaker 5: them out.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, as we always see a prohibition, I mean, we
Speaker 3: look at alcohol provision.
Speaker 2: What do you have?
Speaker 3: You had al capone other gangs with Tommy guns, fully
Speaker 3: automatic machine guns, you know, sweeping the streets, you know,
Speaker 3: shooting as they drive by, standing on the running boards
Speaker 3: of the old cars. And the same type of thing
Speaker 3: is happening in Mexico as well. They just had six
Speaker 3: severed heads found on a busy city street, alongside ominous messages.
Speaker 3: If they start directly attacking these cartels, these guys are
Speaker 3: audacious enough, I would not be surprised to see them
Speaker 3: directly go after American politicians and others. And of course,
Speaker 3: when that happens, that is going to be an excuse
Speaker 3: for our own government to ramp up the police state.
Speaker 3: We've already got Ice agents that are wearing masks discoverywhere
Speaker 3: saying they have to do that to protect themselves. And
Speaker 3: so once they start making attacks on American law enforcement,
Speaker 3: American politicians, judges, all the rest of the stuff, this
Speaker 3: is going to go the same way that did in Mexico.
Speaker 3: We need to understand, folks, that government cannot solve every problem.
Speaker 3: And one problem that government cannot solve is addiction. That
Speaker 3: is a spiritual problem. And unfortunately, we've got a lot
Speaker 3: of Christians who are cheering this on.
Speaker 2: They don't like.
Speaker 3: Drugs, understand how drugs have been so harmful to people,
Speaker 3: maybe many people in their own family, and so they
Speaker 3: want it to be stopped by force rather than by conversion.
Speaker 3: And so it's kind of the passivity of Christians of
Speaker 3: the church that I think is responsible for this in
Speaker 3: so many different areas. They will look to the government
Speaker 3: to step in and to do the job that they
Speaker 3: should be doing as individuals and collect The liberals do
Speaker 3: it with welfare, and the conservatives do it with drug wars.
Speaker 3: And so you have the welfare warfare state, and you
Speaker 3: have liberal liberal Christians say, oh, yeah, let's have the
Speaker 3: government provides stuff for everybody meet their physical needs if
Speaker 3: they're poor. You have the conservatives say, and if we
Speaker 3: have people out there who are struggling with addiction and
Speaker 3: other things like that, let's let the government solve this
Speaker 3: by force. And they're both wrong. They're both looking to
Speaker 3: government as god. Police have not yet provided a motive
Speaker 3: behind the killings. Well, yeah, it's actually the drug war.
Speaker 3: That's the motive. That's what's doing this is it's called money,
Speaker 3: it's called territory. They said there was a sign there
Speaker 3: that was signed by one of the drug gangs, but
Speaker 3: they're playing stupid, I guess is a group that calls
Speaker 3: itself Boradora, which translates to the sweeper and so Apart
Speaker 3: from drugs trafficking, the region is famously plagued by the
Speaker 3: issue of fuel smuggling, which generates billions of dollars in
Speaker 3: a year for the gangs behind the nefarious illegal activity,
Speaker 3: so you can have you know, it starts out they
Speaker 3: get you give them a monopoly on a black market
Speaker 3: on drugs. They start to get rich with that, they
Speaker 3: kill their competition, just as we've seen with alcohol approbation,
Speaker 3: and then they get involved in human trafficking, which is
Speaker 3: also evil. But then they get involved in a black
Speaker 3: market of stolen oil, and so they can get involved
Speaker 3: in any number of criminal enterprises with US, and it's
Speaker 3: the drug war that got them started, the drug war
Speaker 3: that made them rich and made them powerful and ruthless,
Speaker 3: and now they're getting into everything. They're only located sixty
Speaker 3: two miles from Mexico City, they said, generally they don't
Speaker 3: have this kind of extreme cartel violence that has been
Speaker 3: seen in other parts of the country there, but it's
Speaker 3: going to go everywhere as long as they let this
Speaker 3: continue to roll. And the fundamental thing that's motivating all
Speaker 3: this is the United Nations War on drugs that we
Speaker 3: have put together. I'm going to read some of the comments.
Speaker 5: Sure yeah, s A Miller say. Sam Miller one two
Speaker 5: three says, this adult does not have to show his
Speaker 5: idea and they do not have to notify the parent
Speaker 5: that the child is being removed. It's something but a
Speaker 5: free ticket to human trafficking. This is of course about
Speaker 5: the California law.
Speaker 6: Well, they wouldn't want to inconvenience undocumented pedophiles from being
Speaker 6: able to collect children at the local kindergarten.
Speaker 5: And that is a human trafficking is a huge, huge issue.
Speaker 3: Democrats don't want to do anything to protect the border.
Speaker 3: But the entire open border thing, which they claim they're
Speaker 3: trying to facilitate and help people that are illegally All
Speaker 3: of that is really about child trafficking and human trafficking,
Speaker 3: prostitution as well as the pedophile.
Speaker 5: Networks sa Miller one two three against is. I would
Speaker 5: never criticize a family that flees from a tyrannical government.
Speaker 5: At this point, the scales are unbalanced. That's yeah. I agree.
Speaker 5: If you or child is in the crosshairs of these lunatics,
Speaker 5: of these monsters, getting out of there is the only
Speaker 5: thing you can do. You're not going to win in
Speaker 5: a fight against the California state where if you do,
Speaker 5: it may end up, you know, ruining your family in
Speaker 5: the process.
Speaker 2: Absolutely right.
Speaker 3: Well, we're going to take a quick break and when
Speaker 3: we come back, we're going to take a quick look
Speaker 3: at Gaza side. You know what is happening with the
Speaker 3: genocide in Gaza. We will be right back. Stay with us.
Speaker 2: Decoding the mainstream propaganda. It's the David Night Show.
Speaker 3: Well, we just had a malnourished Gaza woman flown to
Speaker 3: Italy and died in the hospital from starvation. The twenty
Speaker 3: year old flew to Pisa with her mother on an
Speaker 3: overnight flight Wednesday, after scheme that was set up by
Speaker 3: the Italian government, she suffered a cardiac arrest and died
Speaker 3: on Friday, less than forty eight hours after arriving. She
Speaker 3: had suffered severe loss of weight and muscle. The Israeli
Speaker 3: military body in charge of aid, CogAT, said on Sunday
Speaker 3: that she had suffered from leukemia. So they said, well,
Speaker 3: it's not starvation leukemia. So if somebody is leukemia or
Speaker 3: they have some other disease, we'll make it better by
Speaker 3: cutting off their food. That's apparently the way that they
Speaker 3: respond with all the people that are turning into skeletons.
Speaker 3: And well, look at this reminds me of Terry Chavo
Speaker 3: for example, right, there was once upon a time, not
Speaker 3: too long ago, you had Christians would take the side
Speaker 3: of people who were being deliberately starved for whatever reason.
Speaker 3: In that particular case, it was a local probate judge
Speaker 3: that decided that he was going to side with the
Speaker 3: husband rather than the family who would take care of
Speaker 3: Terry Chavo and allow the hospital to starve her to death,
Speaker 3: which they proceeded to do. But now we have Christians
Speaker 3: who will side with the net and Yahoo government. Against
Speaker 3: an entire community and allow these people to be starved
Speaker 3: and defend the process. So Israel has denied that their
Speaker 3: starvation in Gaza has accused you and agencies of not
Speaker 3: picking up aid at the border and delivering it. More
Speaker 3: than one hundred and eighty children and adults have been
Speaker 3: brought to Italy since the start of Israel's war with Gaza.
Speaker 3: Thirty one patients and their companions arrived in Rome, Milan
Speaker 3: and Pizza this week, all with serious congenital diseases, wounds
Speaker 3: or amputations, said the Italian Foreign Ministry, complicated by starvation.
Speaker 3: And yet we have Lindsey Graham who tells us that
Speaker 3: this is actually an act of God and we need
Speaker 3: to side with this.
Speaker 2: But to night, it's late at night.
Speaker 17: Israel is in a fight for their lives.
Speaker 18: Our friends in Israel are surrounded by people who would
Speaker 18: kill them all if they could. I am tired of
Speaker 18: the word genocide. Let me tell you about genocide. We
Speaker 18: kind of the action commit genocide. They could, they have
Speaker 18: the capability to do that, they choose not to hamas
Speaker 18: they would commit genocide is thirty seconds.
Speaker 2: They just can't.
Speaker 18: And that's the big difference, folks. To people and my party.
Speaker 18: I'm tired of this crap. Israel is our friend. They're
Speaker 18: the most reliable friend we have in the Mid East.
Speaker 18: There's democracy surrounded the people who would cut their throats
Speaker 18: if they could. This is not a hard choice if
Speaker 18: you're an America. It's not a hard choice if you're
Speaker 18: a Christian.
Speaker 2: A word of warning. If a miracle.
Speaker 18: Pulls the plug on Israel, God will pull the plug
Speaker 18: on us.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and we're not let that happen. Let's pull the
Speaker 3: plug on people and guys alike. They pull the plug
Speaker 3: on Terry Shavo.
Speaker 18: The President Trump has stood with Israel at the most
Speaker 18: difficult time since its founding October seventh, with an effort
Speaker 18: to destroy the State of Israel, the largest loss of
Speaker 18: Jewish life since the Holy Goths. And here we are
Speaker 18: almost two years later, and Israel's the bad guy.
Speaker 2: That's yeah, because they're continuing the war over two years.
Speaker 2: The bad guy.
Speaker 5: They're the good guy.
Speaker 18: The bad guys or the radial Islamis who would kill
Speaker 18: everybody in this room if they could. Graham my vision
Speaker 18: of right and wrong. When it comes to foreign policy,
Speaker 18: President Trump has stood up for all the right things,
Speaker 18: and he stood up against wrong things.
Speaker 3: Just light right, Okay that What was it that you
Speaker 3: said when you were playing that, I caldn't hear you.
Speaker 3: This is Lindsay getting in turning into an End Times preacher.
Speaker 2: But what was it? What was your comment? Like?
Speaker 6: Oh, just that he specifically said that he was tired
Speaker 6: of the word genocide, not genocide itself, just you know,
Speaker 6: people throwing that word at him.
Speaker 2: Stop using that word.
Speaker 3: You keep saying that, but I think I know what
Speaker 3: that means, but I don't want you to say that word.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, This is a.
Speaker 3: Guy who has always in the past, he has never
Speaker 3: shied away from needless war, and so now he's trying
Speaker 3: to pretend that he is on God's side. This is
Speaker 3: a guy who went to Ukraine with John McCain and said,
Speaker 3: next year we're going to send you guys in there.
Speaker 3: We'll go get putin you know, this closet and homosexual
Speaker 3: who's now an End Time preacher Because guess what if
Speaker 3: you're a preacher or a politician, that makes you lots
Speaker 3: and lots of money if you take that side.
Speaker 6: Another video of Lindsey Graham and the Deck talking about
Speaker 6: finishing the job in Gaza.
Speaker 3: After Yeah, well the other thing too. He referred to
Speaker 3: what Netanyahu said. He said, if we wanted to commit genocide,
Speaker 3: we could have done it in a moment. So I
Speaker 3: guess we should be grateful.
Speaker 5: That they're taking their time with it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that they're doing it in so motion. Rather than
Speaker 3: just dropping nukes on them, they decided that they would
Speaker 3: cut them off and starve them to death slowly.
Speaker 5: So yeah, I think you could actually make the argument
Speaker 5: this is less humane and more grotesque than if you
Speaker 5: were to do it all at once and just get
Speaker 5: it over with.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so God will kill us all we're not supporting Israel? Right,
Speaker 3: So Chris Manorham right.
Speaker 2: Doesn't it then.
Speaker 3: Follow that those who oppose Israel pose an existential threat?
Speaker 3: So how does Graham want opponents of Israel to be
Speaker 3: dealt with? If he actually fears that they're going to
Speaker 3: get us all killed? What should our punishment be? Should
Speaker 3: we be thrown into prison or should we be killed
Speaker 3: outright to spare the country? Which kind of reminds me
Speaker 3: of this Ai meme that somebody put out to troll
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk, who is cut from the same cloth. This
Speaker 3: is Charlie Kirk, the crucifixion of Christ. And what you
Speaker 3: have here is you see an individual on the cross.
Speaker 3: You see Christ on the cross, and that's panning across
Speaker 3: the crowd and stops at Charlie Kirk, who.
Speaker 2: Says Israel has a right to defend itself. Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: probably what he would do. Yeah, they pan across this.
Speaker 3: He is there, everybody's dressed in clothing over two thousand
Speaker 3: years ago, and he raises his hand with a microphone
Speaker 3: in it and says that.
Speaker 5: So, Charlie Kirk is truly just he brings nothing of
Speaker 5: value to anything. All he does is aroundist. He'll sit
Speaker 5: around and he'll debate these college students that have no
Speaker 5: life experience, that know nothing about anything, and it'll post these,
Speaker 5: you know, clips online. Look at how he owned this
Speaker 5: idiot college students Like, yeah, that's a real accomplishment.
Speaker 2: Charlie.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, we talked about Nick flint is and
Speaker 3: how anti family he is, and you know, quite frankly,
Speaker 3: for Charlie Kirk to go around and to to push
Speaker 3: homosexual political leaders because he wants to get a bigger
Speaker 3: political tent, I think it's just as anti family is
Speaker 3: what Nick Fuentes does. And you know, since Lindsey Graham
Speaker 3: doesn't really show any signs of believing or fearing God,
Speaker 3: he has to act as if he is God right,
Speaker 3: or at least make government God I think is really
Speaker 3: what's going on. Another example of this, Mike Kukabee justifies
Speaker 3: Israeli military killing of aid seekers and Gaza In an
Speaker 3: interview published by the Times of Israel and Wednesday, Huckabee
Speaker 3: justified the Israeli military there's shooting of unarmed Palestinians who
Speaker 3: are trying to get food. How could be downplayed the
Speaker 3: reports of people being killed by the IDF near GHF sites,
Speaker 3: but admitted that it does happen. He says, have there
Speaker 3: been instances where maybe people were shot by IDF soldiers?
Speaker 3: Best I can tell that has happened, said the ambassador.
Speaker 3: But you know, hey, so what that happens with war?
Speaker 3: You know what, Huckerby, you might want to go back
Speaker 3: and look at the just worth theory. That's one of
Speaker 3: the reasons why we say prolonging a war is makes
Speaker 3: the war unjustified because things like this always do happen
Speaker 3: in war. You always have unintended consequences. But if you
Speaker 3: are prolonging the war, that in and of itself makes
Speaker 3: it unjustified. How could be claimed the IDF soldiers were
Speaker 3: only trying to protect themselves from the starving Palaestinians. Ey
Speaker 3: witness accounts from Palaestinian's contradict Huckabe's claims that they were
Speaker 3: being rushed by a large crowd. He says, you've got
Speaker 3: a group of let's say, fifteen IDF soldiers and you
Speaker 3: got thousands of people running at them. They fire warning
Speaker 3: shots and then if that doesn't stop them, they have
Speaker 3: to use real bullets of these people. No, that's not
Speaker 3: the case, and as a matter of fact, it is
Speaker 3: a scenario that the videos show exactly the opposite.
Speaker 2: The videos show groups.
Speaker 3: Of unarmed Palestinians coming under fire while taking cover. Tony Aguilar,
Speaker 3: a retired US Army green beret who worked at one
Speaker 3: of these GHF sites, has said that the IDF regularly
Speaker 3: fires live ammunition at unarmed people as a form of
Speaker 3: crowd control, kind of preemptively. You know, when their backs
Speaker 3: are turned even, he said, and they're walking away from
Speaker 3: the GHF sites, they shoot them in the back. Israel's
Speaker 3: use of live ammunition on aid seekers has included tanks
Speaker 3: and artillery shells. Huckaby appeared to mock the idea of
Speaker 3: using non lethal means of control. During the interview, the
Speaker 3: interviewer said that he wished that there were non lethal
Speaker 3: crowd control methods being used in Gaza. Huckabee replied, yeah,
Speaker 3: don't we all. The interviewer then noted that there are
Speaker 3: non lethal means to control the crowd, which Huckabee replied
Speaker 3: and said, so what are you going to do? You're
Speaker 3: going to get some girl scouts to take them in.
Speaker 3: This is a guy that used to be a Baptist preacher,
Speaker 3: so pretty you know, they turned to politics.
Speaker 5: Just as long as it's for Israel, murder is fine. Yeah,
Speaker 5: just so long as you're protecting the Holy Land.
Speaker 3: Of course. According to UN numbers from August, the first
Speaker 3: thirteen hundred and seventy three pole sities have been killed
Speaker 3: while seeking food, eight hundred and fifty nine in the
Speaker 3: vicinity of the GHF sites, and five hundred and fourteen
Speaker 3: along the routes of food convoys. Mal nursed kids are
Speaker 3: arriving daily at Gaza hospitals. As Netnahu denies that they
Speaker 3: are starving them, the evidence says other, and there have
Speaker 3: been many pictures of this, of course they always say,
Speaker 3: well the child had some other disease, so we decided
Speaker 3: we would remove food as well. We're going to take
Speaker 3: a quick break and we're gonna come right back. I
Speaker 3: want to say before We've got something I want to
Speaker 3: cover before Gerald joins us. Gerald Centi is gonna be
Speaker 3: joining us today. I got a lot to talk to
Speaker 3: Gerald about. There's of course I haven't talked to him
Speaker 3: in three months, but this last couple of weeks with
Speaker 3: what's going on with Putin and talks about Ukraine, be
Speaker 3: interesting to see what he has to say about that,
Speaker 3: as well as what's going on the stock market and
Speaker 3: gold with AI. So anxious to see what Gerald has
Speaker 3: to say.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Folks, liberty, it's your move.
Speaker 2: And now the David Knight.
Speaker 3: Show symposium is going to begin and all attention is
Speaker 3: going to be on Jerum Powell's speech, and we've had
Speaker 3: released the minutes of previous previous meetings there. The Global
Speaker 3: Central Bank Confab writes. Zero hedge has historically been used
Speaker 3: by FED speakers to signal upcoming policy changes, most notably
Speaker 3: back in twenty twenty, when the Fed launched something they
Speaker 3: call the faiit flexible inflation targeting the fate, So I
Speaker 3: guess they hold the fate of us all. If they
Speaker 3: were to switch those two of those words, they are
Speaker 3: the order. If they made it the flexible inflation average targeting,
Speaker 3: it'd be FIAT. But that's what these people are all about.
Speaker 3: The question is are they going to cut rates? And
Speaker 3: it appears that Powell is starting to soften up on this.
Speaker 3: Maybe he's gotten the message that the Trump administration is
Speaker 3: going to try to find some criminal charges against him
Speaker 3: to remove him. They've already found criminal charges against a
Speaker 3: FED governor, which I think are valid. They've been fishing
Speaker 3: around for Trump Powell, but I think he would.
Speaker 2: Rather just cut the rates.
Speaker 3: By the way, the Harvard Endowment Fund, you know, this
Speaker 3: is Harvard that gets nine billion dollars of US taxpayer
Speaker 3: money every year. They have an endowment fund that is
Speaker 3: two hundred and eighteen million dollars. Well, it's bigger than that.
Speaker 3: It's the biggest endowment fund that anybody's got. The two
Speaker 3: hundred and eighteen million dollars, it's not all the fun.
Speaker 3: The fund is so big that they just purchased for
Speaker 3: the first time gold and bitcoin, and they purchased two
Speaker 3: hundred and eighteen million dollars of gold and bitcoin. So
Speaker 3: I don't know how big the the endowment fund is,
Speaker 3: but they bought shares into some of these gold ETFs.
Speaker 3: Just more evidence of the people at Harvard aren't as
Speaker 3: smart as they want you to think that they are.
Speaker 2: That is not the way that you want to hold gold.
Speaker 3: That is a promissory note from some people in Hong
Speaker 3: Kong and Shanghai Gold Exchange saying, oh, yeah, we really
Speaker 3: do have gold that backs this up, and we're going
Speaker 3: to share sell you shares and some gold that you
Speaker 3: can't really have a chance to audit, and you can't
Speaker 3: cash it in on gold either. You're buying shares in
Speaker 3: a fund that accumulates gold and you can't tell how
Speaker 3: much gold they've got, and it's distant. But that's what Harvard,
Speaker 3: that's how they're going to invest in gold. They've been
Speaker 3: late to the party and now they have jumped in
Speaker 3: with ETFs. Harvard's investment in gold comes as gold precious
Speaker 3: metal ETFs saw their largest inflows in the first half
Speaker 3: of the year since twenty twenty, according to data from
Speaker 3: the World Gold Council ETF Gold holdings increased by one
Speaker 3: hundred and seventy tons in the second quarter. So a
Speaker 3: lot of people have gotten the message that the honest
Speaker 3: way to hold gold outside of these companies is to
Speaker 3: get physical gold and silver. You can find that at
Speaker 3: David Knight dot Gold. They'll take you to Tony Ordoman's Wisewolf
Speaker 3: Gold and you can get physical gold, physical silver. That
Speaker 3: is you hold in your hand, real stuff, not a
Speaker 3: piece of paper, not a derivative, not a certificate. That's
Speaker 3: the important thing to have. So we're going to talk
Speaker 3: to Jeryl Slinty in just a couple of moments, So
Speaker 3: we're going to take a quick break and get him
Speaker 3: on the line. The question is where is gold going
Speaker 3: from here? Well, if they're going to keep stoking inflation
Speaker 3: and if the market is going to tank. As I
Speaker 3: said earlier, Palleteers had a really bad week. They've gone
Speaker 3: down nine percent, their stock has gone down, and people
Speaker 3: are starting to there's a big whisper campaign now as
Speaker 3: to whether or not AI is going to be financially productive,
Speaker 3: and this AI bubble could easily burst and take down
Speaker 3: the entire stock market with it. If that's to happen,
Speaker 3: I'd be interested to know, and we're going to find
Speaker 3: out what Jeryl Slinty thinks will happen to the economy,
Speaker 3: to the stock market, and also to the price of gold.
Speaker 3: So we're going to take a quick break and we
Speaker 3: will be right back. Stay with us.
Speaker 2: Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show,
Speaker 2: all right.
Speaker 3: Joining us now is Gerald Solenti of Trendsresearch dot com.
Speaker 3: Trendsgerald dot com. It's great to have Gerald on. I
Speaker 3: haven't talked to him in quite some times. The first
Speaker 3: time since I've been back to talk to Gerald, and
Speaker 3: We've got a lot to talk about. This has been
Speaker 3: a very busy week. It's not just three months of
Speaker 3: catching up. Course, Travis has been interviewing him and in
Speaker 3: the time past and doing a great job. But I
Speaker 3: wanted to get Gerald's take on what's going on in
Speaker 3: the markets and what it may be a harbinger of.
Speaker 3: There's a lot of things that are happening right now.
Speaker 3: Thank you for joining us, Jeryl.
Speaker 10: Oh, thank you a great site.
Speaker 12: I'm so glad you're back, and it's a great thing
Speaker 12: on with Travis. You did a terrific job. Yeah, he
Speaker 12: has learned a lot from his daddy.
Speaker 2: I think we're going to keep him.
Speaker 10: I know, it's great to see you.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Yeah, it's uh.
Speaker 3: And for all the people who don't know by now,
Speaker 3: if you use the code to night, you can save
Speaker 3: ten percent at Trends Journal. And it's an excellent publication.
Speaker 3: And you have been talking about what the mainstream media
Speaker 3: is talking about now. You've been talking about that for
Speaker 3: a long time, the fact that this looks like dot
Speaker 3: Com two point zero. But we even had Sam Altman
Speaker 3: basically come out and say that what do you think
Speaker 3: is going to happen if the AI when the AI
Speaker 3: bubble bursts, Because it's going to burst at some point
Speaker 3: in time, just like the dot Com thing did. They
Speaker 3: got way ahead of reality. They overhyped this so much
Speaker 3: that regardless of how it's going to be used, they
Speaker 3: got too far too quickly, and so it's going to
Speaker 3: pull back. What do you think is going to happen?
Speaker 3: The gold and to these stings.
Speaker 10: Are going to be done again.
Speaker 12: You go back to the Trends Journal cover on February fifth,
Speaker 12: we forecast dot Com bus two point zero. Tracking trends
Speaker 12: is the understanding of how we got here, where we are,
Speaker 12: and where we're going. Trends are born, they grow, they mature,
Speaker 12: reach old age, and die. So for the language of
Speaker 12: alland for example, the trend was born in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 12: The AI trend, it's three years old.
Speaker 10: It's an infant. You don't invest all your.
Speaker 12: Money in the first technology made heavy industry or high tech,
Speaker 12: and they overinvested in all of these new AI companies.
Speaker 12: And the data came out, by the way that they
Speaker 12: have zero profits.
Speaker 10: It was a an article in the Final Ancial Times.
Speaker 12: MIT put it out at Yeah, so what we're looking
Speaker 12: at is that there's going to be a dot com bust,
Speaker 12: just like there was back in two thousand.
Speaker 10: And what happened.
Speaker 12: The nasdack went down eighty almost eighty percent. So now
Speaker 12: as we're on the air, it just came out that
Speaker 12: Powell said that looks like they're going to lower interest rates. Now,
Speaker 12: I remember the SMP was down for like what four
Speaker 12: or five days in a row. But yeah, the now
Speaker 12: as it went on the air, is up almost nine
Speaker 12: hundred points because they're going to lower interest rates. Yeah,
Speaker 12: the Nasdaq went up, the SMP went up because they're
Speaker 12: going to lower interest rates. Ohing Gold went up thirty
Speaker 12: an ounce as it went on the air.
Speaker 2: Because now it's.
Speaker 10: Showing it about three thousand.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry, what because it's inflationary? Yeah, where is it
Speaker 3: right now? It went from thirty three hundred to where And.
Speaker 12: The lower interest rates go, the lower interest rates go,
Speaker 12: the deeper the dollar falls. The deeper the dollar falls,
Speaker 12: the high goal prices go up because gold is dollar based,
Speaker 12: so as the dollar goes down, other currencies go up.
Speaker 10: It's cheaper to big gold.
Speaker 12: So now gold is a three thousand, three hundred and
Speaker 12: seventy two dollars and ounces.
Speaker 10: Who went on the air.
Speaker 12: It's been hanging out in the three thousand, three hundred
Speaker 12: dollars three hundred, three thousand, three hundred and thirty. It's
Speaker 12: been in that for like months. So we're very bullish
Speaker 12: on gold. Again, it's not what you like, what you want,
Speaker 12: what you wish for what it's what is.
Speaker 10: And then going back to where is it all going.
Speaker 12: With the AI, we said Chine is going to lead
Speaker 12: the world in a on and again you have to
Speaker 12: make connections between different fields. Let's go back to the
Speaker 12: year two thousand. I mentioned this when I was on
Speaker 12: with Travis. Some ten percent of Chinese eighteen year olds
Speaker 12: went to college. Since your buddy over there, Slick Willy
Speaker 12: for China into the World Trade Orgation, Now nearly nearly
Speaker 12: seventy percent of Chinese eighteen year oldlds go to college,
Speaker 12: forty million of them verse what about or twenty million
Speaker 12: of them? Twenty or forty million, I forget verse four
Speaker 12: million American eighteen year olds. They get their AI addicted
Speaker 12: young people, their high tech addicted.
Speaker 10: This is their lives.
Speaker 12: So let's go back to January when deep Seat came
Speaker 12: out and you mentioned Nvidios stock went down, what's seventeen
Speaker 12: percent in a couple of days or sixty six hundred
Speaker 12: billion dollars worth of value. And now Altman's coming out
Speaker 12: saying what we've said, for the same basic reasons. He said,
Speaker 12: don't underestimate what's going on in China. China is going
Speaker 12: to take over the AI markets. They've overinvested, they're not
Speaker 12: making any money. There's going to be a crash. But
Speaker 12: look how the markets have been artificially propped up today
Speaker 12: because Powell said they're going to lower interest rates, were
Speaker 12: indicated they.
Speaker 2: Are, yes, yes, yeah.
Speaker 3: I talked earlier today about a guy who was one
Speaker 3: of the heads of AI at Google. And as you're
Speaker 3: talking about the Chinese going to college, he's telling Americans,
Speaker 3: he said, don't even bother to go to college, not
Speaker 3: even for law or for medicine. He said, by the
Speaker 3: time you get a degree, AI will be doing that job.
Speaker 3: And so that's the other side of this. What do
Speaker 3: you think is going to happen with this? We know
Speaker 3: because of MIT and other things like this we've seen,
Speaker 3: we know that the AI is not making big bucks
Speaker 3: to justify the massive, massive investments that have been going
Speaker 3: into it.
Speaker 2: So that's what.
Speaker 10: Is getting sorry breaking up, I can't hear.
Speaker 2: Sorry.
Speaker 3: I'll try to talk a little bit more slowly here.
Speaker 3: We know that the financially it's not paying off yet
Speaker 3: for them. What do you think is going to happen
Speaker 3: in terms of the workforce and AI right now? We've
Speaker 3: seen a lot of things we were talking about earlier
Speaker 3: that were actually kind of fraudulent. They had puppet masters
Speaker 3: in the back that we're making it look like the
Speaker 3: AI was doing work that it wasn't actually doing. What
Speaker 3: do you think this is going in the short term
Speaker 3: in terms of careers? Would your advice be to somebody
Speaker 3: to go to college or to get some kind of
Speaker 3: a skilled trade.
Speaker 2: What would you say.
Speaker 12: I say, definitely consider getting a skilled trade. But if
Speaker 12: you're totally AI addicted and that's what your life wants
Speaker 12: to be, you don't do that. But here's the deal
Speaker 12: with it. This guy's right in one sense, that guy Ackman.
Speaker 12: They're investing in AI schools. One of the trends. In
Speaker 12: my book trend Tracking a Trends two thousand, which is
Speaker 12: an international bestseller. Nineteen ninety six, I wrote about interactive you,
Speaker 12: meaning that you're not going to have to go to
Speaker 12: school anymore. It's going to be all online in the future.
Speaker 12: And now it's going.
Speaker 10: To be more than that. AI is going.
Speaker 12: To be teaching you. It is the future. Love it,
Speaker 12: hate it, want it, and it's going to be. Just
Speaker 12: as the government school system brainwashes us with the crap
Speaker 12: that they want to shove down out my throat, AI
Speaker 12: is going to do the same thing. Oh yeah, yeah,
Speaker 12: it'll be very good the orange yep. Yeah, And that's
Speaker 12: the future. It is the future. Again, as you we've
Speaker 12: talked about this. I don't have a cell phone, I
Speaker 12: don't carry one. And again I do the work you
Speaker 12: know I did. I did work for the cellular telecommunications industry,
Speaker 12: going back in the nineteen nineties when that boxes in
Speaker 12: the backs of trunks with areas and been studying the
Speaker 12: radio frequency radiation since then, and how deadly they are. Yeah,
Speaker 12: so this is here. There's an article.
Speaker 10: I drop my glasses. People need to wake up.
Speaker 12: Babies and homes with high levels of wireless radiation have
Speaker 12: triple the risk of development delays.
Speaker 2: Yes, articles just cat Yes.
Speaker 12: One after another. We're putting in the Trends Journal. How
Speaker 12: deadly this stuff is. Yes, that's just on a cell
Speaker 12: phone level. And how the kids are losing their mind. Look,
Speaker 12: walk down the street. Everybody's like this. Nobody says to
Speaker 12: loading anymore. Go to a bar, but their funds on
Speaker 12: the bar. I don't talk to each other anymore. Yeah,
Speaker 12: go to a restaurant.
Speaker 10: Couples. I'm not making it up.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, we've all seen it.
Speaker 12: Yeah, so I'm going back to AI. It is the
Speaker 12: deadly future. Love it, hate it, want it, don't want it,
Speaker 12: makes no difference at what it's. What is it is
Speaker 12: the future. It's going to take over and China is
Speaker 12: going to lead the world in it. There's going to
Speaker 12: be a dot com bust. It'll wipe out the equity markets.
Speaker 12: But don't worry about it. When all else fails, they
Speaker 12: take you to war. Let's go back.
Speaker 10: Nineteen ninety nine. Read your trends journal.
Speaker 12: We said it would bust by the second quarter two
Speaker 12: th thousand.
Speaker 10: It did.
Speaker 12: What happened then again, the Nasdaq was down almost eighty percent.
Speaker 12: Then all of a sudden, nine eleven, nine eleven, everybody
Speaker 12: forgot about it. We're going to get that guy who's
Speaker 12: solidly London alive. Ninety percent of the people swallow the
Speaker 12: crap coming out of little Georgie Bush's mouth. And then
Speaker 12: they created the fake real estate boom ohing the derivatives.
Speaker 12: So we're going to see the same thing happen again.
Speaker 12: They're gonna do something to get the people's mind off
Speaker 12: this crash. The crash is going to come, and it
Speaker 12: may happen in October.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, many times you see the stock market take
Speaker 3: these crashes in October. Let me ask you about some
Speaker 3: other economic issues before we get into war. Tariffs, how
Speaker 3: do you think that's going to affect the economy and
Speaker 3: how is it already affecting us?
Speaker 12: You know, I can't stand I can't stand Trump, uh,
Speaker 12: you know, for what he's doing with the Gaza genocide
Speaker 12: and a lot of other things.
Speaker 10: But I'm in favor of tariffs. And again I say
Speaker 10: why if. But here's the difference.
Speaker 2: Are they going to be inflationary? What do you think?
Speaker 12: Well, just here, if the plants that were going to
Speaker 12: be developed in America were owned by American companies, that's
Speaker 12: one thing. But a lot of these plants that are
Speaker 12: being developed are from foreign nations, and they're going to
Speaker 12: be to get the rewards from it. But look at
Speaker 12: the job numbers. Look at the jobs that are being created.
Speaker 12: You want a job at Walmart? No, maybe you like
Speaker 12: to work at Loans? How about home depot? I think Target?
Speaker 12: We got lousy paying jobs. Again, we only put the
Speaker 12: data in the Trends journal. You know, the jobs that
Speaker 12: are being created in the in the social service sector,
Speaker 12: the healthcare sector, and and and hospitality, they pay nothing.
Speaker 12: Manufacturing when we had manufacturing in this country with the
Speaker 12: high paying jobs.
Speaker 10: And again going back to slick Willy, Hey, get.
Speaker 12: Your jobs out of here, bring them to Mexico. We're
Speaker 12: gonna call it NAFTA. You're gonna get a lot of
Speaker 12: cheap labor. You're gonna make.
Speaker 10: More money and then you pay me off. All right.
Speaker 12: Oh, we're gonna call it campaign contributions and donating to
Speaker 12: my phony crap thing that I've made.
Speaker 10: All right, what is he worth now? About one hundred
Speaker 10: and fifty million dollars? A little piece of scum.
Speaker 2: What do you think about the fact that jump.
Speaker 10: Jobs out of America? Take the jobs out of America.
Speaker 10: We're gonna bring them to China.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're gonna give China.
Speaker 18: All the.
Speaker 2: Go ahead.
Speaker 3: I was just gonna ask you since you brought Upton.
Speaker 3: It's just come out that the Clinton Foundation was under
Speaker 3: investigation back in twenty nineteen, and then the Trump administration
Speaker 3: shut it down. The irs was had a couple of
Speaker 3: whistleblowers who were looking at it. In course, if they
Speaker 3: can identify some big fraud like that, they get a
Speaker 3: finder's fee for that. So they were anxious to do
Speaker 3: this investigation. They got completely shut down by the Trump
Speaker 3: Department of Justice. I've interviewed people who said the Clinton
Speaker 3: Foundation never filed the paperwork charitable foundation would file, and
Speaker 3: they also didn't file the paperwork that you would have
Speaker 3: to do to be a foreign lobbyist. But that was
Speaker 3: all shut down by Trump. What do you think about
Speaker 3: the now supposed reopening of the investigation into the Clintons.
Speaker 3: You think that's going to go anywhere?
Speaker 12: Probably because Trump page to Clinton's, you know, and so
Speaker 12: they'll do everything you can to bring them down. Look
Speaker 12: what it they just did to that clown boy Bolton. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 12: I just rated his house.
Speaker 2: We were just talking about.
Speaker 3: Right at the point where he has an opportunity to
Speaker 3: plot a war with Mexico, he gets arrested. There must
Speaker 3: be a real disappointment for him. This is the guy who,
Speaker 3: like Lindsey Graham, he always wants war everywhere.
Speaker 12: And look at that clown. Look at that ugly, stupid
Speaker 12: clown Bolted like Lizzie Graham, a little jerky. Anyway, going
Speaker 12: back to what we were talking about, the tariffs.
Speaker 10: Yes, once upon a time.
Speaker 12: America had a growing middle class. Oh you like the
Speaker 12: rust belt cities? Now I mean they again, Bill Clinton.
Speaker 10: I mean, these are the facts.
Speaker 12: China did not have the high tech and heavy industry
Speaker 12: technology before they were brought into the World Trade Organization.
Speaker 12: The officially came in two weeks after nine eleven. The
Speaker 12: Western manufacturers, United States and Europe flooded into China. And
Speaker 12: here's the deal. You come in here, you got to
Speaker 12: go in partners with us. When you open your you
Speaker 12: get forty nine percent of the ownership. We get fifty
Speaker 12: one percent. They were booming forward a Chevy's, General Motors, Volkswagen,
Speaker 12: Porsche BMW.
Speaker 10: The sales was skyrocketing. And then what happened.
Speaker 12: Now twenty five years later, China now has all the
Speaker 12: high tech and heavy industry technology they never had given
Speaker 12: to you by the Western manufacturers to make all that money.
Speaker 10: Hey, who's the leader in evs?
Speaker 1: Now?
Speaker 10: Oh, China?
Speaker 12: Yeah, one sector after another, China's leading the world.
Speaker 10: Now let's go back.
Speaker 12: Germany, third largest economy in the world, top manufacturer high
Speaker 12: tech heavy industry rather not high tech heavy industry manufacturers
Speaker 12: in the world, in recession now for two years, heading
Speaker 12: into their third The sales are going way down. But
Speaker 12: don't worry about it. You know what Course is doing now.
Speaker 12: They're getting into the military industrial complex. They're making getting
Speaker 12: into the weapons manufacturers.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and they're borrowing heavenly to do it as well.
Speaker 10: A trillion dollars in debt.
Speaker 12: They're taking out a country that's in recession for two
Speaker 12: years to build up the military industrial complex.
Speaker 10: You like World War One Germans, Now I like World
Speaker 10: War Two better. We got to stop those Russians.
Speaker 12: Oh yeah, you only killed twenty five million of them
Speaker 12: in Operation Barbara Rossa in World War Two, and now
Speaker 12: they're building it up.
Speaker 10: Oh, we're gonna build our infrastructure up soon. Hold the tanks.
Speaker 10: I mean, you can't make this stuff up.
Speaker 12: So, going back to tariffs, I do support them, and
Speaker 12: again people hate me for saying that, But again I
Speaker 12: call it the way I see it. You don't have
Speaker 12: to believe it. Do you think for yourself? But I'm
Speaker 12: going by when manufacturing was here. I'm in play Kingston,
Speaker 12: New York gan't. Once upon a time they used to
Speaker 12: make shirts. They wore shirt factories up here. They used
Speaker 12: to make TV's up here, right. NAFTA sucked the manufacturing
Speaker 12: jobs out of America and then bringing China to the
Speaker 12: World Trade Organization sucked them out. Okay, here, you and
Speaker 12: I talked about the Vietnam War, remember that one.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, we.
Speaker 12: Gotta hate those dirty commies because if they stay in Vietnam,
Speaker 12: they're going to take over all the age.
Speaker 10: Remember that. Who's running Vietnam? Now?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 12: The COMMEDISA they are our We get number two importers
Speaker 12: of clothing, shoes, and furniture come from comedy Vietnam. Oh
Speaker 12: the communists China. Yeah, they teach you they hate the comedies. Hey,
Speaker 12: shut doll up.
Speaker 10: We're doing business with them.
Speaker 2: We're making a lot of You're right, Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 10: That's the hypocrisy.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: And text files and furniture was onere of the big
Speaker 3: industries in North Carolina decades ago. Now that's going to
Speaker 3: Vietnam as well. You know, when we had the first
Speaker 3: Trump administration, you and I were talking about the tax
Speaker 3: cuts in twenty seventeen. I thought, you're exactly right when
Speaker 3: you're pointing out the fact that the tax bill is
Speaker 3: that it was set up all the tax cuts are
Speaker 3: going to the really big corporations. And at the time,
Speaker 3: you know, Trump was saying, well, we're going to use
Speaker 3: that to bring to incentivize corporations returning to the US
Speaker 3: for manufacturing. And I said, now, I don't think that's
Speaker 3: going to happen, because I think that won't happen until
Speaker 3: they are ready to replace humans with robots. I think
Speaker 3: that the big dodge right now is that everybody thinks
Speaker 3: that the manufacturing is going to bring in quality jobs
Speaker 3: back to America. But I think that the manufacturing that
Speaker 3: they reshore is going to be going those jobs will
Speaker 3: be going to robots, not to humans. What do you
Speaker 3: think about that?
Speaker 12: Yeah, that's going to happen in the future, just like
Speaker 12: the Industrial Revolution. You know, people used to knit by
Speaker 12: hand and make things by hand, and the Industrial Revolution
Speaker 12: came in, but again it created a different level of jobs. Yeah,
Speaker 12: the robots will take over, but it's years away. It's
Speaker 12: going to be a while and in a lot of them,
Speaker 12: but a lot of them they won't be doing. And
Speaker 12: again goes back to AI. AI is going to be
Speaker 12: taking over a lot of jobs and the worst is
Speaker 12: yet to come. There's no question about it.
Speaker 3: Let me ask you about stable coin. There's a lot
Speaker 3: of people in around Trump, you know, Lucky Lutnik who
Speaker 3: was lucky enough not to go to work on nine
Speaker 3: to eleven, and all these people that they're really pushing
Speaker 3: for stable coins. The Genius Act is pushing that, laying
Speaker 3: illegal groundwork, and many of us have looked at that
Speaker 3: and said, you know, with all know your customer rules,
Speaker 3: all the rest of the stuff, it's going to operate
Speaker 3: no differently than a central bank digital currency. But one
Speaker 3: aspect of it, I think is that they're looking to
Speaker 3: replace banks. Eric Trump has said that at a meeting
Speaker 3: that they had in I think as UAE, he said
Speaker 3: banks are going to be gone in ten years, the
Speaker 3: small banks. Of course, the big banks are going to
Speaker 3: be doing business with the government, but I'm talking about
Speaker 3: the small local banks. What do you think is going
Speaker 3: to be the impact of that as we switch from
Speaker 3: banks to stable coin? What do you think about that?
Speaker 12: Let's go back we talk about AI and how the
Speaker 12: world is AI addicted and high tech addicted. It's the
Speaker 12: future and is making up the stable coin crap?
Speaker 10: Is a lot of crap?
Speaker 3: Is stable coins tied to the US dollars?
Speaker 10: Yeah? What kind of crap is this?
Speaker 12: Go back to your trench journal. From dirty cash to
Speaker 12: digital trash.
Speaker 10: And that's all it is. And the Chinese are leading
Speaker 10: the way.
Speaker 2: Go to China.
Speaker 12: Nobody uses cash, nobody uses credit cards, everything's digitized.
Speaker 10: It's the future.
Speaker 3: Yeah, when I looked at it, right, But let's go
Speaker 3: take the banks away. Yeah, where the bank's gonna What
Speaker 3: are we gonna lose with the banks? I think cash
Speaker 3: is part of it. Right, it's going to be make
Speaker 3: it more difficult to deal with cash.
Speaker 10: Back to banks. Let's go back to the banks.
Speaker 12: Jimmy Karda, remember Jimmy Kada, the peenut farmer. That's the
Speaker 12: slime ball that started the movement for interstate banking, and
Speaker 12: Slick Willy finally pushed it through.
Speaker 10: Back then.
Speaker 12: Bank of America that was only out in California. Banks
Speaker 12: were not allowed to be intrust state. In interstate, they
Speaker 12: will only intrust it. This is the bill Clinton that
Speaker 12: did away with the Glass Stiegel Act as well, remember
Speaker 12: that one.
Speaker 10: Oh yeah, the banks.
Speaker 12: Remember when we were young people, all the cities had
Speaker 12: local banks and savings banks all gone, the big zone
Speaker 12: everything Trump's kids, right, The big banks are going to
Speaker 12: control They control it now.
Speaker 10: It's a crime syndicate.
Speaker 12: Going back to the stable coins are going to be
Speaker 12: the beginning of the cbdc's the Central Bank digital currencies.
Speaker 10: Here's the story.
Speaker 12: When you look at our real debt level, according to
Speaker 12: people like Gary Nullan others, it's about two hundred trillion dollars,
Speaker 12: not thirty seven trillion dollars.
Speaker 10: When you put in social Security and all the other government.
Speaker 2: Costs, the unfunded mandates.
Speaker 10: Yes, we got a new coin. We got a new coin.
Speaker 12: It's the new US dollar coin and it's worth a
Speaker 12: lot more than the dollar. And they're going to wipe
Speaker 12: out the debt level. They're going to make up something
Speaker 12: mm hm and they're going to use cbdc's to do it.
Speaker 10: It is the future.
Speaker 12: Credit cards, cash well gone, pop, palm of your hand.
Speaker 10: We'll tell it all. That's all you have to do.
Speaker 10: That's the future. It's going to go all digital, goes
Speaker 10: back to AI, goes back to high tech. It's where
Speaker 10: it is and where it's going.
Speaker 12: And again look at China, you're all going stable coin,
Speaker 12: digital coin pop.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And I think you know, when we lose the small
Speaker 3: banks that are local, I think it's going to have
Speaker 3: an impact on us in terms of loans, personal and
Speaker 3: business loans. And of course it's going to have a
Speaker 3: big impact on us with cash because you know, you've
Speaker 3: got to go to a local bank as a business
Speaker 3: to you know, to turn the cash back into positive
Speaker 3: that type of stuff, and that's where people are going
Speaker 3: to get it. So I think that's going to be
Speaker 3: part of the war on cash as well. I think
Speaker 3: functionally it'll be the stable coins. We functionally the same
Speaker 3: as the CBDC in terms of how they're going to
Speaker 3: use it to track and to control us and everything
Speaker 3: that we do. You know, it's kind of interesting.
Speaker 2: Gerald.
Speaker 3: Also, you know you talk about and we all know
Speaker 3: how in China you have to give ownership to the
Speaker 3: Chinese government in order to do business there, you've got
Speaker 3: to give them a share. Trump is now trying to
Speaker 3: do that with Intel, as you also put in special
Speaker 3: taxes on AMD and on Nvidia.
Speaker 2: What do you think about that?
Speaker 3: I mean, it looks to me like we are rapidly
Speaker 3: moving towards a Chinese fascist version of an economy.
Speaker 2: What do you think, you know, going.
Speaker 12: Back to cbdc's in the digital and what you were saying,
Speaker 12: they're doing it also because they know every and he
Speaker 12: is spent, where you spent it, what you spent it on,
Speaker 12: and most importantly, we get.
Speaker 10: Your tax money from it.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 12: Yeah, because there's no cash lett So that's the main
Speaker 12: reason they want to do it for those three reasons,
Speaker 12: knowing all about you and getting your tax money.
Speaker 10: And what was the question asked about Trump.
Speaker 3: Looking at Intel where he says he's going to take
Speaker 3: a piece of the company. Yeah, well you think about that,
Speaker 3: that's unprecedent on it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, it is.
Speaker 12: Again, the government's going to take more and more control
Speaker 12: and they're going to do everything they can to get
Speaker 12: as much as they can. And it's the again you
Speaker 12: say communist look at look at it. It's a fascist country.
Speaker 12: Not my definition by guy by the name of Mussolini.
Speaker 12: The merger of state and corporate powers.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, and that's what it is.
Speaker 5: Yes, Gerald, I'm here as well. I wanted to ask you,
Speaker 5: how do you see things going with it?
Speaker 10: I can't hear you.
Speaker 5: Oh, I can't hear me.
Speaker 2: Try again, can't hear it.
Speaker 5: Perhaps we can boost the audio. Okay, if you can
Speaker 5: hear me. Now, still can't hear it.
Speaker 2: Still don't hear it. Let me, I'll ask a question
Speaker 2: you wanted to.
Speaker 5: I wanted to ask him about Ukraine and Russia.
Speaker 3: Yeah, what do you think about Ukraine and Russia and
Speaker 3: the so called peace talks that we've had, the parade
Speaker 3: that we've had this last week of the NATO people
Speaker 3: coming to Washington, d C. What to support Zelenski? What
Speaker 3: do you think is going to happen with that? Do
Speaker 3: you think we're going to have peace of some sort
Speaker 3: and if so, what do you think will look like
Speaker 3: or they just going to continue the war? Were able
Speaker 3: to hear me.
Speaker 10: We said, they announced it, Yeah, I hear you.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 12: We said when they announced that they're going to be
Speaker 12: peace talks that it was a lot of bologny. When
Speaker 12: Trump was going to meet with Putin an elastka list,
Speaker 12: we said, nothing's going to happen, and Trump said it
Speaker 12: would be serious consequences if Russia didn't do what he
Speaker 12: told him to do. So look at the cover of
Speaker 12: the Trends Journal magazine this week. Truth the consequences Trump,
Speaker 12: he said, and we said, no, truth, no consequences. We
Speaker 12: knew it was a lot of bologney. Just like remember
Speaker 12: the Iranian peace steel. Yeah, we said, this is a
Speaker 12: lot of bologney. They don't want peace with Iran. This
Speaker 12: is the Trump that ended the nuclear agreement when he
Speaker 12: was president and what happened bombs away over Iran. So
Speaker 12: going back to this, we said from the beginning, Russia
Speaker 12: is not going to give up the territory that they
Speaker 12: have conquered. And what people have no idea about knowing
Speaker 12: is how the war started and why. And we've talked
Speaker 12: about this a dozen times in the Trends Journal back
Speaker 12: in twenty and fourteen, we wrote about the United States.
Speaker 12: So with throw the democratically elected government the Victor Yanikovich
Speaker 12: in Ukraine, because Janikovich had the nerve to.
Speaker 10: Almost do a deal. Would happened?
Speaker 12: Deal with Putin? Not my language, the language of the EU.
Speaker 12: Ukukraine was the most corrupt country in Europe.
Speaker 10: Oh yeah, So what happened? They needed money, They were
Speaker 10: going to make a deal with the IMF.
Speaker 12: And the EU, and Putin said I got a better
Speaker 12: deal for you. I'm gonna give you a lower interest
Speaker 12: rates and drop the price of your oil. And they
Speaker 12: said Janikovich said, okay, we'll go with you.
Speaker 2: No, you won't.
Speaker 10: That's when they overthrew the government.
Speaker 12: They were slaughtering people in the Dhanbas region in Ukraine,
Speaker 12: yah Russians. Ukraine was part of Russia for three hundred
Speaker 12: and fifty years, rigid twenty five years up until Khrushchev.
Speaker 12: They became the leader of the Soviet Union who was Ukrainian,
Speaker 12: said no, this is your country now, it's separate. So
Speaker 12: the people that were in the don Bas region when
Speaker 12: they overthrew the government, they didn't want to go with
Speaker 12: the with the new government. So the Ukrainians was slaughtering them.
Speaker 12: That's when Russia invaded. They're not going to give back
Speaker 12: the territory that they have. They're not going to give
Speaker 12: back Crimea. They had a vote in Crimea were ninety
Speaker 12: six percent of the voting public said they wanted to
Speaker 12: leave Ukraine and go at Russia. They're not going to
Speaker 12: give back Crimea. So the war's going to keep going.
Speaker 2: I agree, I agree.
Speaker 3: I think that, as you said, you know, when everything fails,
Speaker 3: they take us to war, and Europe is definitely failing,
Speaker 3: and the EU wanted their own army for a very
Speaker 3: long time. So I think they're going to use this
Speaker 3: war for both of those purposes. I think they're going
Speaker 3: to keep this thing going one way or the other.
Speaker 3: In the meantime, what do you think is going to happen?
Speaker 2: Do you think that.
Speaker 3: As Germany is going into debt to create a militarized state,
Speaker 3: do you think that they actually will start to buy
Speaker 3: weapons from the US. Do you think that's going to
Speaker 3: happen the next step?
Speaker 10: Yeah, definitely, definitely.
Speaker 12: They should have going to buy like five hundred million dollars.
Speaker 12: It's in the Trends Journal.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 10: This was the cover of the Trends Journal back in
Speaker 10: twenty fourteen.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 12: In the article by doctor Paul Craig Roberts, formacistant Treasury
Speaker 12: Secretary under Ronald Reagan, Washington is driving the world to
Speaker 12: the final war. World to Geminy's not the right America
Speaker 12: has earned, and it's all about the overthrow of the
Speaker 12: democratically elected government.
Speaker 10: I agree, Yanikovich.
Speaker 3: And now before before Trump can collect his Nobel Peace
Speaker 3: Prize for creating a war peace in Ukraine, he is.
Speaker 3: Now there's a push and talk about war with Mexico
Speaker 3: and against the drug cartels.
Speaker 2: What do you think is going to happen with that?
Speaker 10: Nothing?
Speaker 2: So this is just Trump.
Speaker 12: How about Trump calling that Yahoo a war hero, saying
Speaker 12: that he's a war hero too. Yeah, Trump called himself
Speaker 12: a war hero, a war hero, you got five trap deferments.
Speaker 10: I'm the same age as the cat. I could have
Speaker 10: hit a bone spur on his ankle. His daddy paid
Speaker 10: off a dock that he get him out. Yeah, a
Speaker 10: war hero. Yeah, Yeah, they're crazy.
Speaker 2: They absolutely are. Yeah.
Speaker 3: And so you know, if we look at Israel, the
Speaker 3: uh I just played a clip earlier here where Lindsey
Speaker 3: Graham has now become an end time preacher, telling us
Speaker 3: that God is going to pull the plug in America
Speaker 3: if we don't support Israel.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 10: Yeah, we wrote about it in this sweet trends er own.
Speaker 12: By the way, when you put the night code in,
Speaker 12: it's the grand total of two dollars and fifty cents
Speaker 12: a week, a couple of pennies a day, and we're
Speaker 12: giving you with no magazine in the.
Speaker 10: World is given. Nothing comes close to it, that's right.
Speaker 10: And we talk about gold.
Speaker 12: Oh, we went of our forecasts last year top trend
Speaker 12: golden year for gold. It only went up twenty seven
Speaker 12: percent last year. Yes, he said it's going to going
Speaker 12: up this year. Well, it's up at another thirty percent
Speaker 12: this year. It's going to Anyway, Bitcoin not what you like,
Speaker 12: what you want, what you wish for. We said when
Speaker 12: Trump got elected and you mentioned the was it Lutnik
Speaker 12: or the.
Speaker 10: Kid in the in the in the crypto business, right?
Speaker 2: Yeah, the son?
Speaker 10: Yeah.
Speaker 12: Oh and and the Trump families in the crypto business.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 12: Yeah, so and oh and it gave him a three
Speaker 12: hundred over one hundred million dollars his campaign to crypto
Speaker 12: guys and ten million dollars plus plus plus for his inauguration. Yeah,
Speaker 12: you're investing in it. Yeah, so the prices are going
Speaker 12: to keep going up.
Speaker 2: Right, that's right.
Speaker 3: I have a question actually here from an audience member.
Speaker 3: DG eight says, David, can you ask Gerald how much
Speaker 3: cryptos are responsible for keeping gold and silver prices lower
Speaker 3: than they should be? What do you think?
Speaker 12: He's one hundred percent right? If there was no crypto goal,
Speaker 12: prices would be dumped.
Speaker 10: Yeah, yeah, unquestioned. Yeah, and again a made up thing
Speaker 10: mm the high tech world.
Speaker 12: And again the banksters wanted to keep going because all
Speaker 12: going to go cbdc's bank digital currencies, yes, from dirty
Speaker 12: cash to digital trash.
Speaker 3: I have a real problem with you know, everything about it.
Speaker 3: It's not a coin. They call them crypto coins. There's
Speaker 3: no physical coin there. It's not encrypted to to hide
Speaker 3: to make it private.
Speaker 2: It's very public.
Speaker 3: And then of course when you add the stable aspect
Speaker 3: to it, they tie it to the US dollar, which
Speaker 3: is not stable at all. Everything about it seems to
Speaker 3: be a mislabeled, doesn't it.
Speaker 12: Yeah, and I gave miss sorry, maybe they misspelled it.
Speaker 12: It's not crypto, it's clipto.
Speaker 10: Clipping you.
Speaker 12: Yes, Pligo clipto, We're clipping you.
Speaker 3: Yeah, big pumping dump. That's what many people called it.
Speaker 3: Nice of the Storm says, the elephant in the room
Speaker 3: is that if robots replace people, then who will purchase
Speaker 3: the products that they make? Ubi will have no disposable
Speaker 3: income to buy stuff. Well, I think that's where they
Speaker 3: really want to push us is into a global welfare state.
Speaker 3: I've been watching this for quite some time, and I
Speaker 3: was really surprised to see people who had, like Charles Murray,
Speaker 3: who had written the book Losing Ground about the bad
Speaker 3: effects on people of being on welfare. He says, you know,
Speaker 3: it really is debilitating. It makes people dependent on government.
Speaker 3: And they use that research that he had in that book.
Speaker 3: They used it to push welfare reform under the Reagan administration.
Speaker 3: But now even people like Charles Murray are pushing universal
Speaker 3: basic income. You have must pushed it, you had Bloomberg
Speaker 3: pushed it. All these people want to put us on
Speaker 3: welfare and take away our jobs.
Speaker 2: I think that's where we're headed in the future.
Speaker 3: So what else is on your radar here? What do
Speaker 3: you think is going to be happening? Are we going
Speaker 3: to be moving to another escalation with Iran soon at
Speaker 3: this point, certainly it's on the cards eventually. What do
Speaker 3: you see in terms of the next things coming up,
Speaker 3: the next crises that are coming up.
Speaker 12: I'm very concerned about the Israel war and I think
Speaker 12: they're going to attack Iran again.
Speaker 10: Netanya is going to do everything you can to stay
Speaker 10: in power.
Speaker 12: No outrage about the genocide by definition being committed there.
Speaker 12: You know, there are two one million, two point two
Speaker 12: million people living in gods, over a million of them
Speaker 12: at children starving to death in front of everybody's eyes,
Speaker 12: being killed, slaughtered, and we're sitting out with our money,
Speaker 12: by the way, a taxpayer money to give to Israel
Speaker 12: to keep bombing and destroying the place. And now they're
Speaker 12: trying to push them out of there. Whether they want
Speaker 12: to send them to Somalia someplaces with Sudan.
Speaker 2: Do they have a place that they want to send
Speaker 2: them in? Have they mentioned where they want to come?
Speaker 10: Back to Trump?
Speaker 3: Yeah, go back to the What do they have a
Speaker 3: place where they said they want to oh, Sudan? Okay,
Speaker 3: I guess we can bring the people from Sudanne into
Speaker 3: the US, and we can send the Palestinians to Sudan kind.
Speaker 2: Of musical chairs. I guess I don't know. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: well that's crazy.
Speaker 12: And then let's go back to his son in law,
Speaker 12: Jared Kushner. Jared Kushner in March at twenty twenty four,
Speaker 12: it's in your trans journal said that quote, that's very
Speaker 12: valuable waterfront prop and the Palestinians should be pushed into
Speaker 12: an intogev desert. And then Trump came out with his
Speaker 12: Middle East riviera. I remember, so it's it's genocide, yes,
Speaker 12: and no outrage, no outrage, no outrage, no outrage. If
Speaker 12: you come out against it, you're blacklisted, you're an anti
Speaker 12: semit Oh, before you were talking about before I came
Speaker 12: on the air, you were talking about, well, the funds
Speaker 12: that go to the grants that go to Harvard, how
Speaker 12: much did you say they they got?
Speaker 3: It was nine billion dollars they get from the federal
Speaker 3: government that they cut off to them because they had
Speaker 3: pro Palestinian riots there. They get nine billion with a
Speaker 3: B every year from the US government. And they've got
Speaker 3: an endowment that is the largest endowment on earth, and
Speaker 3: they just started investing in gold. But I was laughing
Speaker 3: about the fact that they put it into ets rather
Speaker 3: than in the physical gold.
Speaker 2: So they're not that smart, I guess.
Speaker 12: But the think about it, why are we giving this
Speaker 12: money to these these universities. They don't pay any taxes exactly,
Speaker 12: they and and and what what what?
Speaker 9: What?
Speaker 12: What great accomplishments have they given us of all these years?
Speaker 10: How about zero? Yeah, it's a crime syndicate.
Speaker 2: Yes, I agree.
Speaker 3: And so you've got the conservatives that are cheering and say, yeah,
Speaker 3: we don't want Harvard to have money, but the Trump
Speaker 3: administration will be more than happy to give them all
Speaker 3: of that nine billion dollars a year if they were
Speaker 3: just censor any criticism of Israel. That's the only issue
Speaker 3: they have with them. Yep, Yeah, truly amazing.
Speaker 12: Yeah, it's so when you're talking before about where the
Speaker 12: country is going, as I said, it's fascism. It's according
Speaker 12: to Mussolini, the mergers, state and corporate powers.
Speaker 10: We have no freedom anymore.
Speaker 12: By the way, we're going to be having a piece
Speaker 12: of freedom rally up here in Kingston on September twenty eighth.
Speaker 12: So far Judging Apolitanos, Scott Ritter and Joe Gloria will
Speaker 12: be speakers and it will be starting at two pm.
Speaker 12: And go to occupy peace dot com. Occupy peace dot com.
Speaker 12: I'm a warrior for the principal peace. And by the way,
Speaker 12: do you want to occupy peace or do you want
Speaker 12: to occupy war?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 10: And tell me what God do you believe in?
Speaker 12: All these people who call themselves evangelical Christian?
Speaker 10: What Christ you're talking about?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 6: Oh?
Speaker 12: And all your people that believe were your ten commandments?
Speaker 12: What'd you forget about doushot not kill?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Yeah.
Speaker 3: The very obvious ethics that were taught by Christ and
Speaker 3: the apostles are completely ignored. And these people focus entirely
Speaker 3: on what they think is going to happen at the
Speaker 3: end of the world world, And even if they had
Speaker 3: that right, they're not warranted to go out and kill
Speaker 3: people to make something happen. That's the most lunatic thing
Speaker 3: I've ever seen in my life. That's one of the
Speaker 3: things that really concerns me about Christians and America is how.
Speaker 2: They have jumped in on this.
Speaker 3: You know, I was reading an article the other day
Speaker 3: talking about that was focused on the history of Zionism
Speaker 3: Gerald and I think a lot of people don't realize
Speaker 3: that the Zionist movement in the early days was not
Speaker 3: exclusively focused on Palestine or the Holy Land or whatever.
Speaker 3: They were looking at possibly moving into the northeast, into
Speaker 3: New York, New Jersey areas more because they had so
Speaker 3: many people in New York City. They even looked at Galveston,
Speaker 3: they looked at in Texas, they looked at Uganda, a
Speaker 3: lot of different places. The key thing that the Zionist
Speaker 3: movement was about was having their own country, and all
Speaker 3: of this religious veneer that has been put on it
Speaker 3: is simply window dressing because the people who ran this
Speaker 3: thing were not religious. They weren't They weren't religious Jews,
Speaker 3: they were not Christians. But they've been able to use
Speaker 3: that to deceive people.
Speaker 12: Yeah, theodrehearsal. God made this stuff up like the eighteen nineties. Yeah, oh,
Speaker 12: and what did what did Biden say? He was a Zionist.
Speaker 12: He supports Zionism. He said, you don't have to be
Speaker 12: Jewish to be a Zionist.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well we've seen that. Yeah, there's a lot of
Speaker 3: Christians who are really hardcore and will excuse anything in
Speaker 3: the name of making this happen. It's like, we're in
Speaker 3: the world. Did you ever see people who being able
Speaker 3: to force God's hand, you know, by the actions that
Speaker 3: they're going to do, that doesn't make any sense at all.
Speaker 3: But we've got another couple of questions here, and look, sorry,
Speaker 3: go ahead, Yeah, I've got a question for you. Says
Speaker 3: this is about tariffs. One person comments and said tariff's
Speaker 3: are not about bringing back industry. The terriffs will kill
Speaker 3: consumption and have a chilling effect on what few manufacturing
Speaker 3: is still left in the US, causing inflation. I'm concerned
Speaker 3: because you know, at the very beginning of this, when
Speaker 3: you look at what Peter Navarro did with his so
Speaker 3: called reciprocal taxes, it was focused on a country by
Speaker 3: country basis. It wasn't focused on a particular industry like
Speaker 3: the tariffs of the late eighteen hundreds, and it wasn't
Speaker 3: about being able to raise enough money to get rid
Speaker 3: of the income tax because the government is just too
Speaker 3: large at.
Speaker 10: This point, I can't hear you.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, I can't hear you.
Speaker 3: Okay, can you hear me now? And we lost all audio.
Speaker 3: We've had some issues. Can you hear me now, Gerald,
Speaker 3: he's not hearing me at all. Got anything there?
Speaker 2: Lance?
Speaker 5: I think he's frozen. Yeah, I think we may have
Speaker 5: lost connection.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think we lost contact him. We're going to
Speaker 3: go through an answered some of these questions. I would
Speaker 3: agree with Nathan Bedford Forest eighteen sixty five. I think
Speaker 3: that is exactly what's going to happen. And we've lost
Speaker 3: Gerald here. Our connection has been kind of spotty from
Speaker 3: the very beginning. But hello, Hello, can you hear me?
Speaker 3: Can you hear me?
Speaker 15: Hello?
Speaker 13: Hello?
Speaker 2: Can you hear me? I'm talking?
Speaker 3: See what you can do? Lance, But let's see, maybe
Speaker 3: you need to re establish with him.
Speaker 10: No, it's all broken up. I can't. I can't hear you. Okay, No,
Speaker 10: it's all broken up.
Speaker 3: Okay, Lance, won't you cut the thing and see if
Speaker 3: you're going to establish connection with him. We can hear him,
Speaker 3: but he can't hear us. We can see him, but
Speaker 3: he's not getting a feed from us.
Speaker 5: With some kind of issue with the ISP itself, probably
Speaker 5: the connection is just not very strong right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think that the problem with the tariffs is
Speaker 3: exactly that. I think it's going to be inflationary. I
Speaker 3: think we're going to wind up paying higher taxes, and
Speaker 3: I think that any industry that they do move back
Speaker 3: is going to be automated. And I think its way
Speaker 3: difficult to compete with China, even with automated industry, because
Speaker 3: they put all of the United States as well as
Speaker 3: Europe at a competitive disadvantage with the cost of energy.
Speaker 3: They have given a competitive advantage and energy costs to
Speaker 3: China and to India with the Parish Climate cord. They
Speaker 3: just did it by Fiat and said, you guys can
Speaker 3: use cheap and dirty and it doesn't matter whatsoever. But
Speaker 3: nobody else can even use coal if they clean it.
Speaker 3: But these guys can use coal and they don't have
Speaker 3: to clean it. So you can't compete with China on
Speaker 3: that kind of a basis. Even if they've got robotic
Speaker 3: factories and we got robotic factories, we're not going to
Speaker 3: be able to compete with them. So I'm very concerned
Speaker 3: with what's happening with terrorists. But like Gerald was saying,
Speaker 3: it is a kind of economic fascism, and that is
Speaker 3: what Trump likes. He likes economic fascism. He wants to
Speaker 3: own parts of Intel just like the Chinese government would,
Speaker 3: and he's directly taxing companies himself. I don't know how
Speaker 3: we excuse that. I hope at some point in time
Speaker 3: somebody maybe it's gonna be the courts, because it's not
Speaker 3: going to be Congress. As long as Mike Johnson is there,
Speaker 3: they're never going to try to rein him in from
Speaker 3: his reign of emergencies that he's using to dictate to us.
Speaker 5: Sorry real quick. And I thing to consider is with
Speaker 5: China's slave labor, they are going to be jobs that
Speaker 5: are better suited to be done by people versus robots,
Speaker 5: and they will always have that advantage there. They will
Speaker 5: always be able to put someone in that role for
Speaker 5: a much lower price than anyone in the Western rold
Speaker 5: is able to. They'll just pay them peanuts the slave
Speaker 5: labor price.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, as little as they pay people in China.
Speaker 3: Humans are going to be pretty cost effective compared to
Speaker 3: robots in China for a very long time because they
Speaker 3: come with skills that much better than robots, and they
Speaker 3: just pay them slave wages and half for the longest
Speaker 3: amount of time. Cecilia fourteen David Travis Lance, can you
Speaker 3: tell your email where we can send you emails or
Speaker 3: posted here? Yes, it's on Davidnight dot News, but it
Speaker 3: is Davidknight's show at ProtonMail dot com.
Speaker 5: I also posted it in chat a bit ago.
Speaker 2: Oh okay, all.
Speaker 3: Right, And dougalug says, did you hear Trump saying maybe
Speaker 3: they will let me into heaven for doing such and such. Yeah,
Speaker 3: we've talked about that a couple of times. And isn't
Speaker 3: that a reflection on his spiritual advisors quote unquote like
Speaker 3: Paul White and Robert Jeffries and the rest of them.
Speaker 3: You know, Paul White is completely into the prosperity gospel.
Speaker 3: What she tells people is, you know, just like Joel Austin,
Speaker 3: join the church and give me lots of money and
Speaker 3: then God's going to give you lots of money. Well
Speaker 3: that's not what it's about. And but Trump is drawn
Speaker 3: to that, and that's kind of his spiritual DNA. He
Speaker 3: said his family is very strong followers of Norman Vincent Peel.
Speaker 3: But even people who have like Robert Jefferies, who has
Speaker 3: a mega church in Dallas and he was pushing the
Speaker 3: vaccines for Trump, he's very political. And even he is,
Speaker 3: even though he's not a prosperity gospel guy, he's a
Speaker 3: political connection guy. And evidently he's not going to tell
Speaker 3: Trump what the good news is that Trump can't earn
Speaker 3: his way into heaven. That's good news. Actually, the billionaires
Speaker 3: want to believe that they can. Bloomberg thinks that he can,
Speaker 3: and Trump thinks that he can. They think they can
Speaker 3: buy their way in, and they've got their own set
Speaker 3: of rules. And that's what happens with all religions. Everybody says, well,
Speaker 3: there's going to be certain things that I can do
Speaker 3: in order to get favor with God, and then they
Speaker 3: all make up their list of things that are doable,
Speaker 3: I think this way, and then they fail to be
Speaker 3: able to execute on that list. Quite frankly, that's typically
Speaker 3: what happens. But salvation is a free gift from God
Speaker 3: because of the sacrifice and the work of the Lord
Speaker 3: Jesus Christ, and only people who come to him on
Speaker 3: that basis, not the people who plead their good works,
Speaker 3: even good works that were done in the name of Jesus.
Speaker 3: No one is going to be able to earn their
Speaker 3: way into heaven. But all these billionaires think that they can,
Speaker 3: if there is such a thing. They don't really believe it.
Speaker 3: That's what Bloomberg said, Well, if there is a heaven,
Speaker 3: I don't even have to be interviewed. It's like, I
Speaker 3: don't know what this guy is even thinking that's going on,
Speaker 3: as if God doesn't know everything that he's.
Speaker 5: Done awakening one day.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, you can pray for these people, and
Speaker 2: you should pray for them.
Speaker 3: We're told to pray for our leaders, and one of
Speaker 3: the key things is to keep them away from us,
Speaker 3: but also that they may have relationship with God that
Speaker 3: would keep them from being so oppressive to us, and
Speaker 3: that's an appropriate thing to pray for.
Speaker 2: Trump.
Speaker 3: Well, it looks like we have lost our ability to
Speaker 3: communicate with Gerald.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and so it must be on their end or
Speaker 5: some part of the connection between us, because the stream
Speaker 5: is going out fine, and that's a much more intense
Speaker 5: connection than the one that we used to connect to Gerald.
Speaker 5: So I don't know what's going Maybe they're having internet
Speaker 5: trouble there, or maybe there's some break in the line
Speaker 5: somewhere between us.
Speaker 3: But well, it's interesting, you know, when we go back
Speaker 3: and look at this Israeli cybersecurity official who was given
Speaker 3: a get out of jail free card. I think that
Speaker 3: is a very important story because when you look at
Speaker 3: what's going on with Jeffrey Epstein, you got to ask,
Speaker 3: do we have a pattern here?
Speaker 2: I think we do. I mean, you know, we saw that.
Speaker 3: Jeffrey Epstein was given a get out of jail card
Speaker 3: free quite literally by a guy that then later the
Speaker 3: local prosecutor was labeled later promoted by Trump and put
Speaker 3: in t our of the labor department. And that's when
Speaker 3: we found out as people were questioning him about Epstein,
Speaker 3: that's when he said, yeah, it was intelligence operations, and
Speaker 3: I was told to back off of that. Well, it's
Speaker 3: kind of interesting when we look at this case in
Speaker 3: Nevada because the Trump administration is now trying to say
Speaker 3: we had nothing to do with it, and yet they
Speaker 3: had everything to do with it. The entire sting was
Speaker 3: an investigation of the FBI and Homeland Security. They included
Speaker 3: the local police there with their boots on the ground essentially.
Speaker 3: But now Cash, Patel and Bongino are a wall again
Speaker 3: in this doing nothing, and Pam Bondi is also a
Speaker 3: wall in this particular case. But it gets even more
Speaker 3: telling about this because the person that Trump put in
Speaker 3: charge as the federal attorney for Nevada that is there
Speaker 3: is actually Israeli born and she played this game saying
Speaker 3: that she was going to leave it up to the
Speaker 3: local officials to prosecute all this, and that was happening
Speaker 3: as they were giving this guy the ability to leave
Speaker 3: the country. And the response from the net Yahoo government
Speaker 3: was well, we'll be open if they ask us, if
Speaker 3: they give us some details about what happened, and if
Speaker 3: they ask us to extradite, we will consider that. But
Speaker 3: of course they have a history of exactly not doing that.
Speaker 3: You talked about this the other day, Travis, and that
Speaker 3: was actually a CBS report that was talking about the
Speaker 3: massive number of pedophiles that are given a free pass
Speaker 3: to live in Israel.
Speaker 5: Yeah, because of right or return. Just so long as
Speaker 5: you have Jewish ancestry or heritage, they basically don't care
Speaker 5: what you've done. You can flee there and you're basically
Speaker 5: kept safe from extradition under any circumstances.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: And so if you people have showed just this year,
Speaker 5: number of them just they have some of the highest
Speaker 5: ratio of sex offenders now just because this keeps happening,
Speaker 5: they have a numerous number of sex offenders there and
Speaker 5: it continues to grow because of this right of return.
Speaker 3: As Life site News was talking about the incident, they
Speaker 3: have a quote from Sean Kingo's reporting on this, he said,
Speaker 3: talk to officers there. The officers told me they couldn't
Speaker 3: believe it. This is not speculation, this is not rumor,
Speaker 3: this is fact. And yet Israel has paraded him back
Speaker 3: to Tel Aviv as if nothing happens. To the report,
Speaker 3: Henderson to Timeton Center confirmed that he was indeed arrested
Speaker 3: and charged, and felony charges are pending. According to the
Speaker 3: North Star newspaper, Natanyahu's office denied that the arrest took place.
Speaker 3: They released a statement afterward claiming that quote, a state
Speaker 3: employee who traveled to the US for professional matters was
Speaker 3: questioned by American authorities during his stay. The employee was
Speaker 3: not arrested in returned to occupied territories as scheduled. Yet
Speaker 3: that is an outright lie as to what is happening
Speaker 3: when they were pressed for it. The Times of Israel
Speaker 3: did report that he was arrested and booked into the
Speaker 3: Henderson Detention Center, but the Israeli government says, well, we
Speaker 3: have not received any additional details through authorized channels to date.
Speaker 3: Should such details be received, the Directorate will act accordingly.
Speaker 18: So.
Speaker 3: In other words, the Israeli born a federal attorney that's
Speaker 3: in charge of that area would have to send them
Speaker 3: details and requests for extradition. Guess what's going to happen.
Speaker 3: This is a story that shows the cover up of
Speaker 3: pedophiles and our government and their government.
Speaker 2: It shows the.
Speaker 3: Collusion of these intelligence agencies and it shows how Israel
Speaker 3: is in charge of this Trump administration. The US Department
Speaker 3: of State denied intervening to release the skuy Alexandrovitch. The
Speaker 3: state departments he did not claim diplomatic community and was
Speaker 3: released by a state judge pending a court date. And
Speaker 3: he claims that the US government intervened are false. And
Speaker 3: yet the people who are there say that the police
Speaker 3: that were there locally said that he told them that
Speaker 3: he was going to be returning and they let him go. Anyway,
Speaker 3: Two things that you can't escape at the black Hat conference,
Speaker 3: which is where he was, and that is the relentless
Speaker 3: buzz of generative artificial intelligence. He wrote this on Twitter
Speaker 3: and the sound of Hebrew in every corridor Alexandrovitch had
Speaker 3: written on Twitter. He so the key takeaway the future
Speaker 3: of cybersecurity is being written in code, and it seems
Speaker 3: a significant part of it is being authored in Tel Aviv,
Speaker 3: empowered by large language models. It is an exciting time
Speaker 3: to be in the field, and that's what he is.
Speaker 5: There no evil that they won't get Tel Aviv, ugh.
Speaker 5: Tel Aviv is one of the gayest cities on earth.
Speaker 5: They have they conticularly pushed this as Oh, Israel is
Speaker 5: a great it's our only democracy in the Middle East.
Speaker 5: It's the only one where gay marriage is legal or prosecutor.
Speaker 5: It's like that isn't a plus.
Speaker 3: There were pioneers in that and they pushed it much
Speaker 3: earlier than most people did. But it looks like it's
Speaker 3: an exciting time for him to be in the field.
Speaker 3: He's trying to get some miters in the field with him.
Speaker 3: The CBS report was actually in twenty twenty. It highlighted
Speaker 3: the problem of Jewish pedophiles in the US. That's what
Speaker 3: you were talking about.
Speaker 2: They said.
Speaker 3: The problem is compounded by Israel's lack of a sex
Speaker 3: offender registry. They don't even keep track of their own pedophiles.
Speaker 3: They're free to harm people who live in Israel. It
Speaker 3: reminds me of what was done by the NSSA with
Speaker 3: Michael Achino. If you remember the story, Michael Akino was
Speaker 3: at the Presidium in California and working for the NSSA,
Speaker 3: and the chaplain there had his grandson with him, and
Speaker 3: his grandson saw him across the cross the way and said,
Speaker 3: there's Michael Achino. He's got a room that's all black.
Speaker 3: He said, how do you know that? He took me
Speaker 3: in there, And so he contacted the police, and the
Speaker 3: police went to his house and sure enough he had
Speaker 3: a room that was all black, and they began charges
Speaker 3: against him for pedophilia. And this is a guy who
Speaker 3: was an open Satanist. He was praded on TV by
Speaker 3: what was her name, Oprah Winfrey. Oprah Winfrey put him
Speaker 3: out and talking about his temple of set, his Satanic stuff.
Speaker 3: And the response from the NSA was to transfer him
Speaker 3: out of the state of California so that he would
Speaker 3: not be charged by the local officials. And that's precisely
Speaker 3: what is being done by the Trump administration and by
Speaker 3: this Israeli born federal attorney that.
Speaker 2: Is in that area. Well, that's all the time that
Speaker 2: we have for today. Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 3: Don't forget go to Trendsjournal dot com us a code
Speaker 3: night to save ten percent off of Geralds like publication.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining us. Have a good weekend.
Speaker 5: See you Monday.
Speaker 3: The common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down
Speaker 3: our children. They created common past, track and control us
Speaker 3: their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 3: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 3: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 3: created in the image of God.
Speaker 2: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 3: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 3: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 3: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 3: time to turn that around and what they want to hide.
Speaker 3: Please share the information and links you'll find at the
Speaker 3: Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing.
Speaker 3: If you can't support us financially, please keep us in
Speaker 3: your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com