WEBVTT

1
00:00:09.800 --> 00:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So, uh, how long ago? Was this a couple of months?

2
00:00:12.119 --> 00:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember. We were hanging out here.

3
00:00:14.359 --> 00:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>At the old tim Cashiers right before the show, and

4
00:00:17.120 --> 00:00:20.519
<v Speaker 2>I'd made a comment about fertility rates being low but

5
00:00:20.559 --> 00:00:23.600
<v Speaker 2>among conservatives still around like one point eight, to which

6
00:00:23.640 --> 00:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it was Phil Lebanti responded that Catholics have

7
00:00:26.879 --> 00:00:29.879
<v Speaker 2>a higher than replacement rate fertility at like two point four,

8
00:00:30.440 --> 00:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>and then I was like, is that true? And Mary

9
00:00:32.200 --> 00:00:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Morgan was also on the show, and then I think

10
00:00:33.799 --> 00:00:36.560
<v Speaker 2>she mentioned something about divorce rates are also really low,

11
00:00:37.320 --> 00:00:40.079
<v Speaker 2>and then I jokingly said Catholics are the superior Christians,

12
00:00:40.679 --> 00:00:43.439
<v Speaker 2>and to which everyone chuckled, and I antagonistically said should

13
00:00:43.439 --> 00:00:46.079
<v Speaker 2>I tweet that? Because I just knew it cause a storm,

14
00:00:46.200 --> 00:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, ish storm, and then Mary and Phil both

15
00:00:48.280 --> 00:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>said yes, and I was like, okay, so I did.

16
00:00:50.799 --> 00:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>And here we are.

17
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Now do I have the uh, we don't have the

18
00:00:53.679 --> 00:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>oh I can pull well whatever, we don't have the

19
00:00:54.880 --> 00:00:56.759
<v Speaker 2>people to do. But now we actually we're actually gonna

20
00:00:56.759 --> 00:01:00.439
<v Speaker 2>have that debate because admittedly I am a lapsed ethleic.

21
00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:03.159
<v Speaker 2>I was ten years old and my family left the church,

22
00:01:03.240 --> 00:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>so what do I know? So I brought in a

23
00:01:05.519 --> 00:01:10.040
<v Speaker 2>handful of gentlemen to have this conversation and have this

24
00:01:10.120 --> 00:01:12.400
<v Speaker 2>debate over the religion the denomination.

25
00:01:13.000 --> 00:01:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Sir, would you like to introduce yourself first?

26
00:01:14.760 --> 00:01:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Jay Dyer, I host the Alex Jones Show, have

27
00:01:17.799 --> 00:01:20.079
<v Speaker 3>done that for the last five years right for the

28
00:01:20.079 --> 00:01:24.159
<v Speaker 3>Sam Hide Show doing comedy. I've debated all the top

29
00:01:24.200 --> 00:01:27.560
<v Speaker 3>atheist Muslims that are out there and looking forward to.

30
00:01:27.480 --> 00:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>This one right on.

31
00:01:29.359 --> 00:01:31.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm Aiden Mattis. I'm the host of the lore Lodge,

32
00:01:32.040 --> 00:01:35.200
<v Speaker 4>The Weird Bible and History Unhinged on YouTube, and I

33
00:01:35.280 --> 00:01:37.079
<v Speaker 4>have not debated all that many people, so this is

34
00:01:37.079 --> 00:01:38.200
<v Speaker 4>going to be an interesting day for me.

35
00:01:39.920 --> 00:01:43.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm Timothy Gordon. I'm the representative of the superior religion

36
00:01:43.439 --> 00:01:47.319
<v Speaker 5>here today. You know me from YouTube. Rules for Introgrades

37
00:01:47.400 --> 00:01:48.599
<v Speaker 5>is the name of the show. I'm the author of

38
00:01:48.599 --> 00:01:52.480
<v Speaker 5>five books and I'm excited to defend.

39
00:01:52.239 --> 00:01:56.719
<v Speaker 4>Your position that you meant totally literally today. Can we

40
00:01:56.760 --> 00:01:57.519
<v Speaker 4>just end with that?

41
00:01:57.719 --> 00:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So well, I'll start with why it's not the superior legit.

42
00:02:00.319 --> 00:02:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Who wants to go first?

43
00:02:02.239 --> 00:02:04.760
<v Speaker 6>I'll go first. So I used to be Catholic?

44
00:02:05.840 --> 00:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Where are you now?

45
00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Orthodox? Been Orthodox for the past eight years? Orthox Christians.

46
00:02:10.360 --> 00:02:14.599
<v Speaker 3>So I think there's some key things that stand out

47
00:02:14.599 --> 00:02:18.360
<v Speaker 3>as the reason why Catholicism is not superior. One would

48
00:02:18.439 --> 00:02:22.439
<v Speaker 3>be the contradictions that I think have occurred in Catholic dogma,

49
00:02:22.479 --> 00:02:26.000
<v Speaker 3>particularly after the first millennium. You have the notion that

50
00:02:26.039 --> 00:02:28.960
<v Speaker 3>the temporal supremacy of the Roman bishop is necessary for

51
00:02:29.080 --> 00:02:31.919
<v Speaker 3>salvation from the time of Dictatus Pope in ten ninety

52
00:02:32.319 --> 00:02:34.479
<v Speaker 3>all the way up to thirteen oh two when I'm

53
00:02:34.520 --> 00:02:36.599
<v Speaker 3>sunk them. So you have to believe that the pope

54
00:02:36.680 --> 00:02:40.759
<v Speaker 3>has basically Quiza's hotterog type status. He's the world emperor,

55
00:02:40.759 --> 00:02:43.680
<v Speaker 3>and if you don't believe that, you will lose your salvation.

56
00:02:43.800 --> 00:02:47.039
<v Speaker 3>So that was clear dogma in the Middle Ages. Nowadays,

57
00:02:47.080 --> 00:02:48.960
<v Speaker 3>post Vatican Two, when we go to the documents of

58
00:02:49.000 --> 00:02:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Vatican two, that is no longer even mentioned. In fact,

59
00:02:51.879 --> 00:02:55.000
<v Speaker 3>it's de emphasized, and in fact many of the Vatican

60
00:02:55.080 --> 00:02:58.639
<v Speaker 3>two popes have called for the decatholicizing of various Christian states.

61
00:02:58.639 --> 00:03:02.240
<v Speaker 3>So one would be that there's a contradiction there the

62
00:03:02.319 --> 00:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>relationship with the Church to the other religions. For example,

63
00:03:05.319 --> 00:03:08.120
<v Speaker 3>in the Middle Ages you have the condemnation of Muslims

64
00:03:08.120 --> 00:03:12.120
<v Speaker 3>at the Council of n As the abominable sect of Muhammet. Nowadays,

65
00:03:12.159 --> 00:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>post Vatican two, post Acumenism post notes rotate, which are

66
00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:22.159
<v Speaker 3>Vatican two documents. Not only is Islam a selvific religion.

67
00:03:22.439 --> 00:03:25.159
<v Speaker 3>We can actually go and pray in the mosques towards Mecca,

68
00:03:25.280 --> 00:03:29.039
<v Speaker 3>which the last several popes have done, exemplifying their faith

69
00:03:29.599 --> 00:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>that they can't know. There's also the Abu Dhabi Faith

70
00:03:33.560 --> 00:03:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Center which has been built now and I'm sure Tim's

71
00:03:35.719 --> 00:03:37.560
<v Speaker 3>going to take issue with whether you actually can. But

72
00:03:37.840 --> 00:03:42.680
<v Speaker 3>the Vatican two documents actually do promote, especially the Vatican

73
00:03:42.719 --> 00:03:46.639
<v Speaker 3>two Acumenist documents, the notion that we can participate with

74
00:03:47.240 --> 00:03:50.960
<v Speaker 3>and engage in inter religious faith ceremonies and dialogue, which

75
00:03:51.000 --> 00:03:53.919
<v Speaker 3>is in direct contradiction to Mortalium animos in nineteen twenty

76
00:03:54.039 --> 00:03:56.759
<v Speaker 3>nine from Piss eleventh, which says that to do so

77
00:03:57.000 --> 00:04:00.319
<v Speaker 3>is quote the surrendering of the faith. So these are

78
00:04:00.319 --> 00:04:02.759
<v Speaker 3>a couple contradictions. There's many more than death penalty has

79
00:04:02.759 --> 00:04:08.439
<v Speaker 3>recently been changed according to Catholic Catechism. Now according to

80
00:04:08.479 --> 00:04:10.919
<v Speaker 3>Pote Francis, it is quote contrary to the Gospel. If

81
00:04:10.919 --> 00:04:12.919
<v Speaker 3>you go back to the Catechism of Trent, it was

82
00:04:12.960 --> 00:04:15.919
<v Speaker 3>said to be part of natural justice or natural law.

83
00:04:16.000 --> 00:04:19.120
<v Speaker 3>So certainly nobody would believe that the papacy can change

84
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:20.240
<v Speaker 3>or alter natural law.

85
00:04:20.279 --> 00:04:24.360
<v Speaker 2>But is the implication then that the Orthodox Church is static,

86
00:04:24.439 --> 00:04:25.160
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't change.

87
00:04:25.240 --> 00:04:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we would argue that the first thousand years of Christianity,

88
00:04:28.079 --> 00:04:30.160
<v Speaker 3>as you look at it from the Council's perspective and

89
00:04:30.199 --> 00:04:33.199
<v Speaker 3>the canon law and the church father's teachings, that the

90
00:04:33.319 --> 00:04:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Orthodox Church is absolutely synonymous.

91
00:04:35.519 --> 00:04:36.120
<v Speaker 6>With that church.

92
00:04:36.199 --> 00:04:38.600
<v Speaker 3>So it's exactly the same as the first thousand years

93
00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:42.040
<v Speaker 3>of Christianity Rome and the papacies. What has departed, particularly

94
00:04:42.040 --> 00:04:43.519
<v Speaker 3>in the eleven, twelve thirteenth centuries.

95
00:04:44.360 --> 00:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>What about you? You're what denomination are you?

96
00:04:47.160 --> 00:04:49.160
<v Speaker 4>So I have been a Methodist for many years. I

97
00:04:49.199 --> 00:04:52.560
<v Speaker 4>have recently began inquiring into the Anglican Catholic Church, which

98
00:04:52.600 --> 00:04:54.759
<v Speaker 4>is not the Anglican churches in the Church of England,

99
00:04:54.759 --> 00:04:56.720
<v Speaker 4>nor is it the Episcopal Church and actually split off

100
00:04:56.720 --> 00:04:59.079
<v Speaker 4>from that, and I want to say nineteen seventy eight

101
00:04:59.160 --> 00:05:03.000
<v Speaker 4>with Episcopal Church's decision to begin ordaining women. So it

102
00:05:03.079 --> 00:05:06.800
<v Speaker 4>is a conservative Anglican theology. And to be perfectly honest,

103
00:05:06.839 --> 00:05:09.959
<v Speaker 4>I don't really disagree with much of what Jay just said.

104
00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:15.079
<v Speaker 4>Our church largely does tie itself back to the pre

105
00:05:15.759 --> 00:05:18.920
<v Speaker 4>twelfth century Christian Church tries to emulate that. And that's

106
00:05:19.000 --> 00:05:21.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of the position of the Anglican Catholic Church is

107
00:05:22.040 --> 00:05:25.399
<v Speaker 4>we are not the one true Church. We are not

108
00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:30.079
<v Speaker 4>the perfect representation of Christianity. We are doing our best

109
00:05:30.199 --> 00:05:34.759
<v Speaker 4>to retain Christianity prior to councils like the Council of

110
00:05:34.759 --> 00:05:38.759
<v Speaker 4>Trent that we felt changed the religion too much. So,

111
00:05:39.279 --> 00:05:42.600
<v Speaker 4>like Jay said, it's very much the eleventh century and

112
00:05:42.720 --> 00:05:46.279
<v Speaker 4>back is what we consider to be the unified Church.

113
00:05:47.519 --> 00:05:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I have a question, but I'm gonna wait until you

114
00:05:49.120 --> 00:05:50.439
<v Speaker 2>can set your position on Catholicism.

115
00:05:52.519 --> 00:05:55.279
<v Speaker 4>Great Catholicism is the one true Church.

116
00:05:55.600 --> 00:06:00.079
<v Speaker 5>We make this claim based on many premises, but the

117
00:06:00.319 --> 00:06:03.279
<v Speaker 5>first ones are this indefectibility.

118
00:06:03.759 --> 00:06:06.399
<v Speaker 4>The Church can never defect. It won't affect.

119
00:06:06.839 --> 00:06:09.399
<v Speaker 5>Our Lord promised that when the spirit of truth comes

120
00:06:09.480 --> 00:06:13.040
<v Speaker 5>in scripture, he'll guide you into all truth. In John's Gospel,

121
00:06:13.360 --> 00:06:15.720
<v Speaker 5>Gates of Hell won't prevail against the Church of Matthew's

122
00:06:15.720 --> 00:06:16.959
<v Speaker 5>Gospel and Firs.

123
00:06:17.079 --> 00:06:17.519
<v Speaker 4>Timothy.

124
00:06:17.959 --> 00:06:19.480
<v Speaker 5>The Church of the Living God is the pillar and

125
00:06:19.519 --> 00:06:23.680
<v Speaker 5>bulwark of truth. And therefore our Lord is a liar.

126
00:06:23.920 --> 00:06:28.319
<v Speaker 5>If there is some change and you know, this is

127
00:06:28.360 --> 00:06:29.920
<v Speaker 5>a little bit funny because what I'm going to be

128
00:06:29.920 --> 00:06:33.560
<v Speaker 5>doing is talking about super specific church terms religion terms

129
00:06:33.639 --> 00:06:38.720
<v Speaker 5>with Jay today, and then we'll be talking about more

130
00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:44.040
<v Speaker 5>broad things, because really Protestantism isn't technically a religion, it's

131
00:06:44.079 --> 00:06:46.319
<v Speaker 5>a faith. But we can talk about things like the

132
00:06:46.360 --> 00:06:50.399
<v Speaker 5>ecumenical councils, the first seven ecumenical councils, about which Orthodox

133
00:06:50.439 --> 00:06:54.519
<v Speaker 5>and Catholic agree in something like four of these first

134
00:06:54.600 --> 00:06:55.680
<v Speaker 5>four ecumenical councils.

135
00:06:55.839 --> 00:06:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I'll read you chapter in verse.

136
00:06:57.399 --> 00:07:00.519
<v Speaker 5>But so Orthodox, the Orthodox has a the you of

137
00:07:00.560 --> 00:07:03.639
<v Speaker 5>the Pope, which is the church's view, the church's second

138
00:07:03.680 --> 00:07:07.920
<v Speaker 5>millennium view of the pope, and the Orthodox defected on this.

139
00:07:08.040 --> 00:07:14.800
<v Speaker 5>Now Protestants defected. They represent the soul of defectibility. Indefectibility

140
00:07:14.839 --> 00:07:18.360
<v Speaker 5>means that nothing's going to change. Protestants are are religion

141
00:07:18.399 --> 00:07:21.360
<v Speaker 5>that sprang forth from the earth like Athena from Zeus's

142
00:07:21.360 --> 00:07:25.560
<v Speaker 5>head in the sixteenth century. It's it's proto Enlightenment, abstract

143
00:07:25.639 --> 00:07:31.240
<v Speaker 5>rationalism that's vaguely pro Jesus. But Orthodox Catholic debates are

144
00:07:31.639 --> 00:07:34.600
<v Speaker 5>are more specific because we have to talk about what

145
00:07:34.639 --> 00:07:38.920
<v Speaker 5>the at the very least the first seven ecumenical councils

146
00:07:38.959 --> 00:07:42.480
<v Speaker 5>require and the first second ecumenical councils about which Jay

147
00:07:42.560 --> 00:07:45.199
<v Speaker 5>and I agree. If you go to like number three,

148
00:07:45.680 --> 00:07:50.240
<v Speaker 5>Ephesus involves the Patriarch of Constantinople, the highest guy in

149
00:07:50.480 --> 00:07:57.759
<v Speaker 5>their second millennium church, being fired by being requested to

150
00:07:57.800 --> 00:08:02.079
<v Speaker 5>be fired by other Eastern Orthodox guys like Cyril of Alexandria.

151
00:08:02.120 --> 00:08:04.920
<v Speaker 5>He writes the Pope and he says, can you excommunicate

152
00:08:05.879 --> 00:08:09.959
<v Speaker 5>the Patriarch of Constantinople. Thestory is because he's saying this absurdism,

153
00:08:10.600 --> 00:08:14.120
<v Speaker 5>like like unto what many Protestants say today that marries

154
00:08:14.160 --> 00:08:17.959
<v Speaker 5>the Mother of Jesus but not God, and so kind

155
00:08:17.959 --> 00:08:20.480
<v Speaker 5>of like Dwight Schrut says in the office, if you

156
00:08:20.519 --> 00:08:22.759
<v Speaker 5>are the guy that can, that's actually boss, you can

157
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:23.480
<v Speaker 5>make a firing.

158
00:08:23.839 --> 00:08:27.120
<v Speaker 4>And tons upon tons upon tons.

159
00:08:26.800 --> 00:08:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Of first millennium Eastern thinkers from the Eastern lung of

160
00:08:31.279 --> 00:08:34.399
<v Speaker 5>the Church associated with Orthodoxy, but also Catholic saints like

161
00:08:35.759 --> 00:08:39.919
<v Speaker 5>you know, the Cappadocian Fathers, all the Gregory's say, Bowsel

162
00:08:39.960 --> 00:08:43.799
<v Speaker 5>the Great. They acknowledge the unity, the visible sign of

163
00:08:43.879 --> 00:08:48.600
<v Speaker 5>unity that is represented on earth by the Pope and

164
00:08:48.759 --> 00:08:51.519
<v Speaker 5>the headship of the Pope. Just tons upon tons of

165
00:08:51.559 --> 00:08:54.320
<v Speaker 5>these guys, and tons upon tons of the councils also

166
00:08:55.240 --> 00:08:59.799
<v Speaker 5>Nicea two, Constantinople, three, Constantinople four. We kind of disagree

167
00:08:59.799 --> 00:09:02.240
<v Speaker 5>with it about it, and even the union of Florence

168
00:09:02.240 --> 00:09:04.799
<v Speaker 5>at the Council of Florence, which is an ecumenical council.

169
00:09:04.919 --> 00:09:07.919
<v Speaker 4>It was called by an emperor. Well, a lot of

170
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:08.720
<v Speaker 4>people don't know this.

171
00:09:08.799 --> 00:09:12.240
<v Speaker 5>We had a reunification of the Catholic in the Orthodox churches,

172
00:09:12.759 --> 00:09:15.919
<v Speaker 5>and it was a legit unification. Thirty one out of

173
00:09:15.919 --> 00:09:19.360
<v Speaker 5>thirty three bishops in whatever it was, fourteen thirty nine

174
00:09:20.399 --> 00:09:23.440
<v Speaker 5>of the Orthodox came and voted for unification, including the

175
00:09:23.440 --> 00:09:27.600
<v Speaker 5>patriarch of Constantinople, and then they went home and essentially

176
00:09:27.639 --> 00:09:32.120
<v Speaker 5>they were strong armed into nullifying the unification.

177
00:09:32.360 --> 00:09:35.000
<v Speaker 2>So let's try and simplify as much as we can

178
00:09:35.039 --> 00:09:36.399
<v Speaker 2>real quick to make this point. Like I do, I

179
00:09:36.399 --> 00:09:39.480
<v Speaker 2>do have a question, but is the Orthodox argument is

180
00:09:39.480 --> 00:09:41.879
<v Speaker 2>you want to stay true to the original view of

181
00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:48.200
<v Speaker 2>scripture and what it dictates, and is the Catholic view

182
00:09:48.279 --> 00:09:51.879
<v Speaker 2>that it can be updated and changed by the political

183
00:09:51.919 --> 00:09:52.960
<v Speaker 2>structures of the religion.

184
00:09:53.080 --> 00:09:55.200
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely not, I would say, I would say you have

185
00:09:55.240 --> 00:10:00.799
<v Speaker 5>that reverse the Orthodox always being centered in Constantinople, were

186
00:10:00.919 --> 00:10:04.480
<v Speaker 5>close to the emperor. The first thing Constantine did you

187
00:10:04.519 --> 00:10:07.240
<v Speaker 5>know after he legalized Christianity with the Edict of Milan,

188
00:10:07.360 --> 00:10:10.279
<v Speaker 5>is he moved the capital from Rome to Constantinople. He

189
00:10:10.320 --> 00:10:12.440
<v Speaker 5>named the city after himself, which is a badass move,

190
00:10:12.519 --> 00:10:17.600
<v Speaker 5>chad mu and is tim city Constantine city. And so

191
00:10:18.039 --> 00:10:21.600
<v Speaker 5>the Orthodox over the remainder of the first Christian millennium,

192
00:10:21.960 --> 00:10:26.080
<v Speaker 5>they had the patriarch of Constantinople who would be elevated

193
00:10:26.080 --> 00:10:31.240
<v Speaker 5>to the second most powerful under Rome eventually, and they

194
00:10:31.279 --> 00:10:34.879
<v Speaker 5>always had they were next to the emperor, and so

195
00:10:35.120 --> 00:10:38.679
<v Speaker 5>they were always alongside the emperor. And of course there's

196
00:10:38.840 --> 00:10:42.200
<v Speaker 5>multiple Orthodox churches, so they don't even agree on things

197
00:10:42.360 --> 00:10:44.519
<v Speaker 5>like whether they can't be one because they can't be

198
00:10:44.559 --> 00:10:47.039
<v Speaker 5>true to the Gospel, because they don't agree on things

199
00:10:47.120 --> 00:10:49.799
<v Speaker 5>like whether you can have divorce, whether you can have contraception.

200
00:10:49.919 --> 00:10:54.279
<v Speaker 5>Whereas the Roman Catholic Church, under the single you know,

201
00:10:54.399 --> 00:10:59.159
<v Speaker 5>sign of unity, the pope, which everybody hates, they are

202
00:10:59.440 --> 00:11:03.360
<v Speaker 5>kept together. And the second millennium Catholic view of the

203
00:11:03.360 --> 00:11:05.120
<v Speaker 5>pope is exactly what the first.

204
00:11:04.919 --> 00:11:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Millennial review of the pope was.

205
00:11:06.159 --> 00:11:11.600
<v Speaker 3>But Rittinger emits it's not so that he was a lefty.

206
00:11:11.879 --> 00:11:14.039
<v Speaker 2>Again, I'm not, you know, I don't follow any of

207
00:11:14.039 --> 00:11:16.159
<v Speaker 2>the organized religions or anything like that. But real quick,

208
00:11:17.120 --> 00:11:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just the reason I asked the question is different

209
00:11:20.120 --> 00:11:23.240
<v Speaker 2>popes have had different positions on cultural issues. I think

210
00:11:23.480 --> 00:11:26.240
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned the death penalty just now, but there's also

211
00:11:27.639 --> 00:11:30.279
<v Speaker 2>questions of gay marriage and abortions.

212
00:11:30.360 --> 00:11:34.799
<v Speaker 3>Gave the lessons that are allowed in the Francis's and cyclical,

213
00:11:34.840 --> 00:11:37.559
<v Speaker 3>which was a change from the previous Congregation for the

214
00:11:37.600 --> 00:11:39.639
<v Speaker 3>Doctor of the Faith, which is basically the successor to

215
00:11:39.679 --> 00:11:40.519
<v Speaker 3>the Holy Office.

216
00:11:40.960 --> 00:11:41.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

217
00:11:41.240 --> 00:11:43.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and I'm not trying to be rude to Tim,

218
00:11:43.080 --> 00:11:45.120
<v Speaker 3>but Tim didn't actually mention or address any of the

219
00:11:45.159 --> 00:11:47.559
<v Speaker 3>actual contradictions that I listed. He came up with a

220
00:11:47.600 --> 00:11:51.200
<v Speaker 3>list of sort of I would say, equivocations on the

221
00:11:51.200 --> 00:11:53.960
<v Speaker 3>way that different church fathers used the word head. Bazil

222
00:11:54.000 --> 00:11:56.679
<v Speaker 3>in his letters, for example, talks about the Bishop of

223
00:11:56.720 --> 00:11:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Antioch being the head of the whole body, the head

224
00:11:58.960 --> 00:12:02.720
<v Speaker 3>of the world because in his region it was the

225
00:12:02.919 --> 00:12:04.919
<v Speaker 3>chief see right, because he was dealing with the a

226
00:12:04.960 --> 00:12:08.480
<v Speaker 3>schism in Antioch. So this flowery language a lot of

227
00:12:08.480 --> 00:12:10.519
<v Speaker 3>times is used amongst many of the Church Fathers. You

228
00:12:10.559 --> 00:12:13.039
<v Speaker 3>have at the seventh the Commenical Council the phrase the

229
00:12:13.080 --> 00:12:15.440
<v Speaker 3>gates of Hell will not prevail against and then guess

230
00:12:15.440 --> 00:12:18.159
<v Speaker 3>what they use the Emperor. I don't think anybody believes

231
00:12:18.159 --> 00:12:20.159
<v Speaker 3>that Matthew sixteen is about the emperor. But we can

232
00:12:20.200 --> 00:12:21.759
<v Speaker 3>find in the acts of the councils, if you have,

233
00:12:21.840 --> 00:12:25.240
<v Speaker 3>like Prices, books and whatnot, multiple examples of the sort

234
00:12:25.240 --> 00:12:27.360
<v Speaker 3>of language this use. But that doesn't equate to the

235
00:12:27.399 --> 00:12:30.360
<v Speaker 3>idea of Vatican one. And like Temple said, not only

236
00:12:30.399 --> 00:12:33.879
<v Speaker 3>do you have changes in practice or practice, such as

237
00:12:34.200 --> 00:12:37.159
<v Speaker 3>the complete revolution in the most holy thing in the

238
00:12:37.240 --> 00:12:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Roman Catholic Church, the liturgy itself. You have a protestantization

239
00:12:40.679 --> 00:12:45.440
<v Speaker 3>after Vatican two, a liturgical revolution that's more important than

240
00:12:45.639 --> 00:12:47.559
<v Speaker 3>other types of issues.

241
00:12:47.279 --> 00:12:49.159
<v Speaker 6>Like you know, can we have the death penalty?

242
00:12:49.200 --> 00:12:53.840
<v Speaker 3>And I think for Roman Catholic theology, the liturgy itself

243
00:12:53.919 --> 00:12:57.039
<v Speaker 3>is more important. And the post Vatican two popes have

244
00:12:57.200 --> 00:12:59.039
<v Speaker 3>all enforced the.

245
00:12:59.120 --> 00:13:00.639
<v Speaker 6>Dogma of the New Mass.

246
00:13:00.639 --> 00:13:04.000
<v Speaker 3>In fact, Francis said in I Think twenty seventeen, I

247
00:13:04.000 --> 00:13:05.960
<v Speaker 3>have the reference if anyone wants to look and see.

248
00:13:06.000 --> 00:13:09.399
<v Speaker 3>But he said that the reforms of Vatican two are

249
00:13:09.519 --> 00:13:14.600
<v Speaker 3>dogmatic magisterial and irreformable. That means that you cannot reject

250
00:13:14.679 --> 00:13:16.559
<v Speaker 3>any of the things of Vatican two that you don't like,

251
00:13:16.639 --> 00:13:18.480
<v Speaker 3>even if you want to debate the status of them.

252
00:13:18.519 --> 00:13:22.159
<v Speaker 3>So not only have the morals and the ideas changed

253
00:13:22.200 --> 00:13:25.080
<v Speaker 3>and the dogma has changed, even the worship of God

254
00:13:25.120 --> 00:13:28.000
<v Speaker 3>has undergone a substantial Protestant change.

255
00:13:28.039 --> 00:13:31.559
<v Speaker 4>There's no dogma that's changed, there's zero dogmas that What

256
00:13:31.600 --> 00:13:34.799
<v Speaker 4>about what I'm sunk in the deposit of faith? Ununk

257
00:13:35.000 --> 00:13:39.000
<v Speaker 4>wait unam sanctum doesn't represent a dogmatic view?

258
00:13:39.039 --> 00:13:39.639
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean?

259
00:13:39.799 --> 00:13:43.519
<v Speaker 6>So necessary for salvation?

260
00:13:43.679 --> 00:13:46.679
<v Speaker 4>And what Nsinger is not the deposit what it's.

261
00:13:46.480 --> 00:13:49.320
<v Speaker 3>The collections of Catholic dogma. So it does include what

262
00:13:49.440 --> 00:13:52.440
<v Speaker 3>is the normative dogma? So how could you think is

263
00:13:53.120 --> 00:13:57.639
<v Speaker 3>unam sanctum is the thirteen oh two decree of Boniface

264
00:13:57.679 --> 00:13:59.799
<v Speaker 3>that to be saved, not only must you be in

265
00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:02.919
<v Speaker 3>co union with the Roman Pope, you must also accept

266
00:14:03.600 --> 00:14:07.600
<v Speaker 3>the Roman sees temporal supremacy, that he is queizots Hoterac,

267
00:14:07.679 --> 00:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>the Roman bishop is the emperor of emperors. In fact,

268
00:14:10.720 --> 00:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>all the same terminology that's used in the first statement

269
00:14:13.159 --> 00:14:16.879
<v Speaker 3>about this in Dictatus Pope in ten ninety is repeated

270
00:14:17.519 --> 00:14:20.360
<v Speaker 3>not only in When I'm Sanctum, but also all the

271
00:14:20.360 --> 00:14:23.320
<v Speaker 3>way into the eighteen hundreds into the Syllabus of Errors

272
00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:26.320
<v Speaker 3>attached to Vatican One. So you're telling me that from

273
00:14:26.360 --> 00:14:28.559
<v Speaker 3>the thirteen hundreds, from eleven hundred, thirteen hundred, all the

274
00:14:28.559 --> 00:14:31.080
<v Speaker 3>way up to Vatican One and the Syllabus of Errors,

275
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:34.600
<v Speaker 3>all the rejection that they had of the proposition that

276
00:14:34.639 --> 00:14:36.200
<v Speaker 3>the churches in the state could be separate and that

277
00:14:36.240 --> 00:14:38.399
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to believe in the temporal supremacy. That

278
00:14:38.559 --> 00:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>wasn't dogma, even though it was necessary for salvation.

279
00:14:41.120 --> 00:14:41.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

280
00:14:41.559 --> 00:14:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So what I would say to this is that

281
00:14:44.360 --> 00:14:47.519
<v Speaker 4>the contradictions which in here in the heart of Orthodox

282
00:14:47.600 --> 00:14:54.039
<v Speaker 4>Christianity tim are are are more are fundamental, and they're

283
00:14:54.080 --> 00:14:55.600
<v Speaker 4>literally going to address what I call her Is that

284
00:14:55.720 --> 00:14:56.080
<v Speaker 4>just too?

285
00:14:56.840 --> 00:14:57.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

286
00:14:57.159 --> 00:15:03.159
<v Speaker 5>No, is this is really important because the so called tensions, contradictions, developments,

287
00:15:03.240 --> 00:15:09.759
<v Speaker 5>and things like uh, two swords theory are not at

288
00:15:09.799 --> 00:15:13.600
<v Speaker 5>the heart of what's considered doctrine. There's reformable doctrine and

289
00:15:13.639 --> 00:15:15.679
<v Speaker 5>the irreformable doctrine.

290
00:15:15.159 --> 00:15:16.679
<v Speaker 6>And what i'm doctrine?

291
00:15:16.679 --> 00:15:20.480
<v Speaker 5>What about Because we're looking at people that are are

292
00:15:20.519 --> 00:15:23.480
<v Speaker 5>Protestant we're talking to Orthodox. The most important thing for

293
00:15:23.600 --> 00:15:26.919
<v Speaker 5>the listeners out there is if there's a head of

294
00:15:27.039 --> 00:15:30.600
<v Speaker 5>the church, then if there's a meaningful head of the church,

295
00:15:31.120 --> 00:15:34.000
<v Speaker 5>then Roman Catholicism is true. And this so we have

296
00:15:34.039 --> 00:15:37.000
<v Speaker 5>to start at the beginning. Literally, it's not equivocation. This

297
00:15:37.080 --> 00:15:39.879
<v Speaker 5>is as direct as we can be. If there's a head,

298
00:15:39.919 --> 00:15:42.559
<v Speaker 5>and we should we should be specific. Let's let's be

299
00:15:42.639 --> 00:15:45.600
<v Speaker 5>specific to the actual councils about which we agree, and

300
00:15:45.600 --> 00:15:47.000
<v Speaker 5>that This is what Jay is going to be trying

301
00:15:47.039 --> 00:15:51.039
<v Speaker 5>to avoid today, is that the seven councils that they

302
00:15:51.120 --> 00:15:55.559
<v Speaker 5>accept defines what the pope is and the specific kind

303
00:15:55.559 --> 00:15:58.279
<v Speaker 5>of headship that the visible sign of unity on earth

304
00:15:58.320 --> 00:15:59.840
<v Speaker 5>that they are. I'll read some to you in a

305
00:15:59.840 --> 00:16:02.879
<v Speaker 5>second from Emphasis from Nicia two from Constant Noble.

306
00:16:02.639 --> 00:16:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Three to four.

307
00:16:03.840 --> 00:16:07.679
<v Speaker 5>And if there's a pope that is a meaningful boss

308
00:16:08.000 --> 00:16:11.799
<v Speaker 5>that is appealed to with a kind of appellate supreme jurisdiction,

309
00:16:12.480 --> 00:16:14.440
<v Speaker 5>then Roman cathals is a mass to be true, because

310
00:16:14.440 --> 00:16:17.519
<v Speaker 5>it's the only one of the three sects that represents this.

311
00:16:17.600 --> 00:16:20.759
<v Speaker 5>So listen to what was said at Ephesus, signed onto

312
00:16:20.879 --> 00:16:23.799
<v Speaker 5>by the Orthodox Holy and Blessed Peter the Prince and

313
00:16:23.840 --> 00:16:26.320
<v Speaker 5>head of the Apostles, the column of Faith, the foundation

314
00:16:26.440 --> 00:16:30.440
<v Speaker 5>of the Catholic Church. The Prince of the Apostles received

315
00:16:30.440 --> 00:16:33.120
<v Speaker 5>the keys of the Kingdom of from our Lord Jesus Christ,

316
00:16:33.200 --> 00:16:35.039
<v Speaker 5>and that to him was given the power of binding

317
00:16:35.039 --> 00:16:37.879
<v Speaker 5>and loosing sins, who until this day and forever lives

318
00:16:37.879 --> 00:16:41.000
<v Speaker 5>and judges in his successors. Now, what happened leading to

319
00:16:41.039 --> 00:16:45.200
<v Speaker 5>the Third Ecumenical Council Ephesus is you have this guy

320
00:16:45.200 --> 00:16:49.000
<v Speaker 5>in Nestorius that's teaching falsely. He's the patriarch of Constantinople,

321
00:16:49.080 --> 00:16:52.759
<v Speaker 5>that that Mary was mother to human Jesus, but not

322
00:16:52.879 --> 00:16:56.039
<v Speaker 5>God Jesus dividing his natures. Lots of Protestants today say

323
00:16:56.080 --> 00:16:57.840
<v Speaker 5>this neither Orthodox nor Catholic.

324
00:16:57.919 --> 00:17:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Clust or lots of person, not the nature's right.

325
00:17:06.440 --> 00:17:08.279
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, yeah, dividing his person, not the nature.

326
00:17:08.400 --> 00:17:13.000
<v Speaker 5>So Cyril of Alexandria writes, the pope writes the boss

327
00:17:13.240 --> 00:17:15.599
<v Speaker 5>of the churches, or early early on, this is the

328
00:17:15.640 --> 00:17:18.480
<v Speaker 5>exact view of the papacy that the Roman Catholic Church has. Now,

329
00:17:18.519 --> 00:17:21.839
<v Speaker 5>it's a collegial first, but the Orthodox are going to

330
00:17:21.920 --> 00:17:24.640
<v Speaker 5>hit you with this idea that the pope was merely

331
00:17:24.680 --> 00:17:27.480
<v Speaker 5>the first among equals. This is one of those nonsense

332
00:17:27.599 --> 00:17:30.720
<v Speaker 5>terms that would mean like a roundtable where he's not

333
00:17:30.799 --> 00:17:33.720
<v Speaker 5>actually appealed to. He doesn't have a kind of appellate jurisdiction.

334
00:17:34.119 --> 00:17:37.400
<v Speaker 5>He would not be able to excommunicate any of the

335
00:17:37.440 --> 00:17:40.240
<v Speaker 5>other patriarchs. And so they they write to him, and

336
00:17:40.400 --> 00:17:42.720
<v Speaker 5>Cyril says, to the Pope, we rely on the authority

337
00:17:42.720 --> 00:17:45.920
<v Speaker 5>of the blessed Apostle Peter, on whom the church was founded,

338
00:17:46.640 --> 00:17:49.200
<v Speaker 5>and whose success of the Blessed Celestine, who his pope

339
00:17:49.200 --> 00:17:49.799
<v Speaker 5>at the time is.

340
00:17:49.839 --> 00:17:51.359
<v Speaker 4>He also says, your holiness.

341
00:17:50.920 --> 00:17:53.279
<v Speaker 5>Who holds the place of Peter, the Prince of the

342
00:17:53.319 --> 00:17:57.200
<v Speaker 5>Apostles has rightly judged this matter and condemned the stories.

343
00:17:57.240 --> 00:17:59.640
<v Speaker 5>Now what Jay and the Orthodox have to say is

344
00:17:59.640 --> 00:18:01.720
<v Speaker 5>that it's merely honorary position.

345
00:18:02.160 --> 00:18:04.480
<v Speaker 4>But he could fire people well like you would tell me.

346
00:18:04.839 --> 00:18:05.799
<v Speaker 6>I can I address that up.

347
00:18:06.000 --> 00:18:07.400
<v Speaker 4>I just want to I want to cut I mean,

348
00:18:07.960 --> 00:18:11.119
<v Speaker 4>I think the term prince here is very important because prince.

349
00:18:11.160 --> 00:18:12.640
<v Speaker 4>A prince is not an emperor. A prince is not

350
00:18:12.680 --> 00:18:15.960
<v Speaker 4>a king. A prince is first citizen princeps That's what

351
00:18:16.000 --> 00:18:19.240
<v Speaker 4>the word meant, princess prerogative. Prerogative goes with sure, but

352
00:18:19.319 --> 00:18:21.720
<v Speaker 4>what what the orthoro appealing to his prerogative. What the

353
00:18:21.799 --> 00:18:25.279
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox position is and what the Protestant position is historically

354
00:18:25.680 --> 00:18:29.680
<v Speaker 4>is that the pope has primacy, he is first among equals.

355
00:18:30.079 --> 00:18:33.559
<v Speaker 4>That does not mean that he gets to unilaterally make

356
00:18:33.599 --> 00:18:36.920
<v Speaker 4>decisions in in an objection, in the objection to the

357
00:18:36.920 --> 00:18:37.319
<v Speaker 4>other pope.

358
00:18:37.440 --> 00:18:39.759
<v Speaker 5>Well, that that fault that runs vul of ephesis. I'll

359
00:18:39.799 --> 00:18:41.680
<v Speaker 5>read you and I see it too, after Jay says.

360
00:18:41.680 --> 00:18:45.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'll answer his claim from emphesis, and that the

361
00:18:45.480 --> 00:18:46.839
<v Speaker 3>idea of an appleate jurisdiction.

362
00:18:46.880 --> 00:18:47.960
<v Speaker 6>Everyone is well aware of this.

363
00:18:48.000 --> 00:18:50.519
<v Speaker 3>In fact, the Vatican itself has a great commentary on

364
00:18:50.599 --> 00:18:55.119
<v Speaker 3>the meaning of this appellate structure in the recent document

365
00:18:55.160 --> 00:18:57.559
<v Speaker 3>from Chi eighty, which is a Vaticant approved document on

366
00:18:57.640 --> 00:18:58.200
<v Speaker 3>exactly what.

367
00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:00.839
<v Speaker 6>Was not authoritative, it's a proved document.

368
00:19:01.039 --> 00:19:03.279
<v Speaker 3>So this is what. This is what Rome nowadays says him.

369
00:19:03.319 --> 00:19:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't like what Rome says nowadays, but this is what

370
00:19:05.400 --> 00:19:07.759
<v Speaker 3>not dogmatic what It doesn't matter because this is what

371
00:19:07.839 --> 00:19:09.799
<v Speaker 3>Rome says nowadays, not a Church document.

372
00:19:09.799 --> 00:19:12.160
<v Speaker 4>It's dogmatical, dogmatic.

373
00:19:12.200 --> 00:19:14.599
<v Speaker 3>Your quote mind isn't dogmatic either, So allow me to

374
00:19:14.680 --> 00:19:15.319
<v Speaker 3>allow me to.

375
00:19:15.519 --> 00:19:17.039
<v Speaker 1>It is just real quick. This is one of the

376
00:19:17.039 --> 00:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>most esoteric debates.

377
00:19:18.440 --> 00:19:21.039
<v Speaker 2>Ever, it's going to be there are even Christians of

378
00:19:21.079 --> 00:19:23.039
<v Speaker 2>each denomination been like, what are they talking about?

379
00:19:23.200 --> 00:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>So what Rome nowadays says about this is that Sartica

380
00:19:26.799 --> 00:19:28.920
<v Speaker 3>was received at the Council of Trello. The Canons of

381
00:19:28.920 --> 00:19:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Sartica determined that a bishop who has been condemned can

382
00:19:31.720 --> 00:19:33.880
<v Speaker 3>appeal to the Bishop of Rome, and that the latter,

383
00:19:33.960 --> 00:19:36.720
<v Speaker 3>if he likes it or deems it appropriate, can order

384
00:19:36.759 --> 00:19:40.480
<v Speaker 3>a retrial. Notice it is not a unilateral statement, very

385
00:19:40.480 --> 00:19:42.519
<v Speaker 3>contrary to exact to the reading that you gave of it.

386
00:19:42.599 --> 00:19:44.519
<v Speaker 3>He can order a retrial to be conducted by the

387
00:19:44.559 --> 00:19:48.039
<v Speaker 3>bishops in the province neighboring that bishop. It is not

388
00:19:48.160 --> 00:19:51.559
<v Speaker 3>real room unilaterally deciding it totally contrary to the reading

389
00:19:51.599 --> 00:19:53.559
<v Speaker 3>that he gave of it. And then it says such

390
00:19:53.920 --> 00:19:57.359
<v Speaker 3>appeals it doesn't matter. Such appeals two major seeds were

391
00:19:57.400 --> 00:20:00.599
<v Speaker 3>always treated in a sonodal way. Appeals to the Bishop

392
00:20:00.640 --> 00:20:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of Rome from the East expressed the community of the church,

393
00:20:03.440 --> 00:20:07.400
<v Speaker 3>but the but Rome did not exercise canonical jurisdiction over

394
00:20:07.559 --> 00:20:10.880
<v Speaker 3>the churches of the East. So when Athenasius gets appeals

395
00:20:11.240 --> 00:20:14.400
<v Speaker 3>to excommunicate people, does that make athenacious The head of

396
00:20:14.400 --> 00:20:14.759
<v Speaker 3>the church.

397
00:20:14.799 --> 00:20:16.279
<v Speaker 6>Of course not that's eighties.

398
00:20:18.079 --> 00:20:21.039
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter because it's Rome's present statement on what

399
00:20:21.079 --> 00:20:24.279
<v Speaker 3>your church's tradition is. These are so this is what happens.

400
00:20:24.279 --> 00:20:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Pick and choose the documents that you don't like. So

401
00:20:26.279 --> 00:20:30.799
<v Speaker 3>this is Rome so more then the Roman theologians. Now,

402
00:20:30.839 --> 00:20:34.319
<v Speaker 3>because Rome actually says what I'm saying about apple jurisdiction,

403
00:20:35.240 --> 00:20:39.480
<v Speaker 3>I understand a retrial. Can you name a single scholar

404
00:20:39.519 --> 00:20:42.000
<v Speaker 3>that talks about this that doesn't have the giady of view?

405
00:20:43.000 --> 00:20:46.279
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, yeah, all of the scholars who aren't with community.

406
00:20:46.680 --> 00:20:47.799
<v Speaker 6>Yeah yeah, that is.

407
00:20:47.960 --> 00:20:48.599
<v Speaker 4>That is not one.

408
00:20:48.960 --> 00:20:49.640
<v Speaker 6>Let me name one.

409
00:20:49.720 --> 00:20:52.920
<v Speaker 5>Let me see, scholars aren't the mind of the church.

410
00:20:53.000 --> 00:20:56.240
<v Speaker 4>By the way, really, I'm talking about dogma. It hasn't changed.

411
00:20:56.240 --> 00:20:58.039
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like the three dogmas I listened to, Dogma

412
00:20:58.680 --> 00:21:01.079
<v Speaker 3>one is the contradiction those were in dogmas.

413
00:21:01.599 --> 00:21:04.160
<v Speaker 4>See it too, so was on the christ Book.

414
00:21:04.680 --> 00:21:07.279
<v Speaker 3>When I'm sicked, When I'm sicked them all the way

415
00:21:07.359 --> 00:21:10.640
<v Speaker 3>up until syllabus of errors is necessary for salvation And

416
00:21:10.680 --> 00:21:11.039
<v Speaker 3>it's not.

417
00:21:11.000 --> 00:21:13.240
<v Speaker 5>Dog But we're talking about the first seven councils. Let's

418
00:21:13.240 --> 00:21:15.880
<v Speaker 5>get to you talking about that. I'm the reason I'm

419
00:21:15.880 --> 00:21:18.839
<v Speaker 5>talking about it is because Jay, because well if the.

420
00:21:20.759 --> 00:21:22.839
<v Speaker 4>If the first seven councils didn't be with the current

421
00:21:22.880 --> 00:21:23.720
<v Speaker 4>position of the church.

422
00:21:24.559 --> 00:21:26.599
<v Speaker 5>But see the trick is that. So what we have

423
00:21:27.680 --> 00:21:31.359
<v Speaker 5>we have is quote my perio, you have thirty nine

424
00:21:31.359 --> 00:21:35.960
<v Speaker 5>thousand sec. Nine thousands. Okay, no we are there are

425
00:21:35.960 --> 00:21:40.640
<v Speaker 5>fourteen Auducephalus. There are fourteen Autocephalist churches. So the tensions

426
00:21:40.920 --> 00:21:44.200
<v Speaker 5>resides in for for we're autphalus fourteen.

427
00:21:44.200 --> 00:21:45.400
<v Speaker 6>Do you know where it comes where?

428
00:21:45.559 --> 00:21:51.200
<v Speaker 5>But so autocephalus churches what relatively unified with themselves? He

429
00:21:51.319 --> 00:21:54.839
<v Speaker 5>dates we have when you have a business back century,

430
00:21:54.920 --> 00:21:57.519
<v Speaker 5>when you have one holy Roman Catholic Church, the fore

431
00:21:57.599 --> 00:21:59.880
<v Speaker 5>marks of the church. This comes from nicea one. When

432
00:21:59.880 --> 00:22:02.640
<v Speaker 5>you have one, there's of course, this is what they're

433
00:22:02.640 --> 00:22:06.079
<v Speaker 5>playing on. It's a strong rhetorical position. Naturally, there's going

434
00:22:06.119 --> 00:22:08.720
<v Speaker 5>to be lots of disparity within the religion, and so

435
00:22:08.880 --> 00:22:13.000
<v Speaker 5>documents have to be ordered hierarchically. What's called the depositom fide,

436
00:22:13.119 --> 00:22:16.920
<v Speaker 5>what never changes in the church, best represented in real

437
00:22:16.960 --> 00:22:19.960
<v Speaker 5>time by something called the act of apostolic Ascetus is

438
00:22:20.759 --> 00:22:23.640
<v Speaker 5>something that is airtight. And there are tons and tons

439
00:22:23.680 --> 00:22:27.400
<v Speaker 5>of liberal scholars since Vatican two, since Vatican One that

440
00:22:27.480 --> 00:22:31.160
<v Speaker 5>present opinions that they alied on. Francis is probably the

441
00:22:31.160 --> 00:22:33.720
<v Speaker 5>worst pope we've ever had that do not make it

442
00:22:33.759 --> 00:22:36.559
<v Speaker 5>into the act Apostolic ascetis, and certainly don't make it

443
00:22:36.559 --> 00:22:38.799
<v Speaker 5>into the deposit of Faith. I thought we'd come here

444
00:22:39.079 --> 00:22:41.160
<v Speaker 5>and talk about the first seven Councils because it's that

445
00:22:41.240 --> 00:22:43.359
<v Speaker 5>which we agree about. Me and I see it too.

446
00:22:43.440 --> 00:22:44.680
<v Speaker 5>Let me just get this out.

447
00:22:45.000 --> 00:22:45.599
<v Speaker 4>It says this.

448
00:22:45.720 --> 00:22:48.279
<v Speaker 5>If you think that that I was quote mining Ephesus Jay,

449
00:22:48.559 --> 00:22:52.160
<v Speaker 5>primatial authority everywhere on earth was given by the Redeemer

450
00:22:52.200 --> 00:22:55.119
<v Speaker 5>of the world himself, Jesus to the blessed Apostle Peter,

451
00:22:55.200 --> 00:22:58.319
<v Speaker 5>through the same Apostle the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Roman

452
00:22:58.400 --> 00:23:00.759
<v Speaker 5>Church has held till now and will hold for all

453
00:23:00.839 --> 00:23:03.079
<v Speaker 5>time primacy and sovereign authority.

454
00:23:03.119 --> 00:23:04.799
<v Speaker 4>So you have the lineage there.

455
00:23:05.000 --> 00:23:08.000
<v Speaker 5>It's for all time, it's primacy, it's sovereign authority. If

456
00:23:08.039 --> 00:23:10.599
<v Speaker 5>there's a head of the Church that can fire other guys,

457
00:23:11.119 --> 00:23:12.960
<v Speaker 5>then this is the kind of pope that the Roman

458
00:23:13.000 --> 00:23:14.480
<v Speaker 5>Catholic Church describes as.

459
00:23:14.759 --> 00:23:17.680
<v Speaker 3>A huge objection to this. First of all, Pope Virgilius

460
00:23:18.039 --> 00:23:21.279
<v Speaker 3>at the Fifth Ecumenical Council in the Acts of Constantinople two,

461
00:23:21.880 --> 00:23:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the council decrees that he be excommunicated and removed from

462
00:23:25.240 --> 00:23:28.440
<v Speaker 3>the Diptys Virgilius submitted to the council. Does that sound

463
00:23:28.599 --> 00:23:31.480
<v Speaker 3>like a autocratic position or does it sound like the

464
00:23:31.480 --> 00:23:32.960
<v Speaker 3>councils above the pope collegial?

465
00:23:33.119 --> 00:23:35.440
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not. No, the pope is collegial.

466
00:23:35.519 --> 00:23:38.920
<v Speaker 5>This is exactly what Vatican one says. Vatican one says

467
00:23:38.960 --> 00:23:42.240
<v Speaker 5>that the pope has a collegial relationship to the rest.

468
00:23:42.039 --> 00:23:43.759
<v Speaker 6>Of the bishop, but does it say that he relies

469
00:23:43.799 --> 00:23:44.480
<v Speaker 6>on the church to doing it?

470
00:23:46.079 --> 00:23:50.480
<v Speaker 5>Submitted to the pope, same as you know, i'mius.

471
00:23:50.640 --> 00:23:53.720
<v Speaker 3>The people ain't gonna fall this, but bill to the council,

472
00:23:53.839 --> 00:23:58.799
<v Speaker 3>not the pope. Yeah, but Jillius was excommunicated by the council.

473
00:23:58.559 --> 00:24:01.599
<v Speaker 5>Right, According to Richard Price, the pope submitted to the council.

474
00:24:01.640 --> 00:24:04.880
<v Speaker 5>You said, Yeah, that's what the post one view.

475
00:24:06.119 --> 00:24:08.680
<v Speaker 4>The pope submitting to the council not prove that the

476
00:24:08.680 --> 00:24:09.319
<v Speaker 4>council has.

477
00:24:09.599 --> 00:24:12.279
<v Speaker 5>At all, No, no, no proofs that the pope bears a

478
00:24:12.319 --> 00:24:13.519
<v Speaker 5>collegial relationship.

479
00:24:13.599 --> 00:24:16.119
<v Speaker 3>Listen, Vatican one says that the council is not above

480
00:24:16.119 --> 00:24:18.359
<v Speaker 3>a pope. You know that, so of course it's not

481
00:24:18.359 --> 00:24:20.640
<v Speaker 3>above a pope. And why is Vigilius submitting.

482
00:24:20.279 --> 00:24:24.880
<v Speaker 5>Because everyone else, Protestants and Orthodox misunderstand what the pope's

483
00:24:25.000 --> 00:24:28.359
<v Speaker 5>primacy that seems quite convenient primacy exactly well it is,

484
00:24:28.440 --> 00:24:30.920
<v Speaker 5>it's it's well, it's highly inconvenient to the Catholic argument

485
00:24:30.960 --> 00:24:34.599
<v Speaker 5>that you misunderstand it. The pope's relationship to all of

486
00:24:34.680 --> 00:24:38.319
<v Speaker 5>the all of the other churches is specifically this.

487
00:24:39.599 --> 00:24:43.160
<v Speaker 4>He is sorry to the bishops. Is this he's collegial.

488
00:24:43.200 --> 00:24:48.680
<v Speaker 5>He has this ex cathedral power to declare infallible truth

489
00:24:49.319 --> 00:24:52.160
<v Speaker 5>when and only when he makes the claim, and most

490
00:24:52.200 --> 00:24:53.799
<v Speaker 5>of the time the only two times we know that

491
00:24:53.839 --> 00:24:56.559
<v Speaker 5>he's used the power in the last thousand years. Everyone

492
00:24:56.599 --> 00:25:00.359
<v Speaker 5>misunderstands it. What he did first in eighteen fifty four

493
00:25:00.559 --> 00:25:03.799
<v Speaker 5>and then in nineteen fifty is he pulled all the

494
00:25:03.799 --> 00:25:06.240
<v Speaker 5>bishops of the world to make sure that this ex

495
00:25:06.319 --> 00:25:09.519
<v Speaker 5>catho draw power which is not oracular. He's not divining

496
00:25:09.519 --> 00:25:11.839
<v Speaker 5>out of his head magical truths that have never been

497
00:25:11.880 --> 00:25:14.519
<v Speaker 5>taught the pope. Because the Roman Catholic Church is the

498
00:25:14.519 --> 00:25:16.680
<v Speaker 5>one church that goes all the way back to Scripture,

499
00:25:17.039 --> 00:25:19.279
<v Speaker 5>the pope wants to make sure that bishops always and

500
00:25:19.440 --> 00:25:23.559
<v Speaker 5>everywhere have taught the immaculation objection.

501
00:25:23.880 --> 00:25:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Thought also, how does make rich alone? Go back to scripture.

502
00:25:27.720 --> 00:25:30.039
<v Speaker 5>You see the distinction, though, tim So when the Pope

503
00:25:30.079 --> 00:25:31.759
<v Speaker 5>says I'm going to say something the ex cathedra and

504
00:25:31.839 --> 00:25:35.680
<v Speaker 5>everyone goes apious. This is not he's divining when he

505
00:25:36.599 --> 00:25:40.640
<v Speaker 5>special the pope has a collegial relationship to the bishops.

506
00:25:41.480 --> 00:25:43.920
<v Speaker 3>I got their boss, I got community. Then he can't

507
00:25:43.920 --> 00:25:46.519
<v Speaker 3>be he can't be fired if he's their boss. And

508
00:25:46.599 --> 00:25:48.119
<v Speaker 3>that's exactly what happens with the vigilius.

509
00:25:48.160 --> 00:25:49.880
<v Speaker 4>It's more like the board of a company firing.

510
00:25:49.960 --> 00:25:52.880
<v Speaker 3>This one says that the pope is not superior to

511
00:25:52.920 --> 00:25:53.480
<v Speaker 3>a council.

512
00:25:53.680 --> 00:25:55.000
<v Speaker 6>He doesn't submit to the council.

513
00:25:55.000 --> 00:25:57.039
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me ask you said it, you said it, Okay,

514
00:25:57.039 --> 00:25:58.759
<v Speaker 2>I got a question. I'm not a Catholic. I got

515
00:25:58.759 --> 00:26:00.079
<v Speaker 2>no idea. What half the stuff you got your and

516
00:26:00.119 --> 00:26:03.039
<v Speaker 2>all these Latin things and everything you said? The Pope

517
00:26:03.160 --> 00:26:04.640
<v Speaker 2>can decree infallible truth?

518
00:26:04.759 --> 00:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Am I wrong?

519
00:26:05.319 --> 00:26:08.039
<v Speaker 4>Is that he say when he speaks from his special

520
00:26:08.079 --> 00:26:09.400
<v Speaker 4>chair from pastor.

521
00:26:09.400 --> 00:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So if he's if he's in his is it actually

522
00:26:11.880 --> 00:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a special chair?

523
00:26:12.599 --> 00:26:15.119
<v Speaker 4>Like? What is it? From the chair?

524
00:26:15.400 --> 00:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>So from the chair he can declare something to be true,

525
00:26:18.839 --> 00:26:22.119
<v Speaker 2>like if he said gary marriage is never a thing.

526
00:26:22.559 --> 00:26:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Is that an example of what he might say.

527
00:26:24.559 --> 00:26:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he could also say the opposite. He would have

528
00:26:26.799 --> 00:26:29.440
<v Speaker 4>to respect it, of course, right, And here's the proof.

529
00:26:29.759 --> 00:26:32.319
<v Speaker 5>He could say something ex cathedra has never been declared

530
00:26:32.319 --> 00:26:35.200
<v Speaker 5>that wasn't held from all time, the beginning of the church,

531
00:26:35.359 --> 00:26:36.599
<v Speaker 5>which is what happened.

532
00:26:36.839 --> 00:26:37.799
<v Speaker 4>I didn't really get it out.

533
00:26:38.079 --> 00:26:41.039
<v Speaker 5>When the pope has made ex cathedra claims, there are

534
00:26:41.039 --> 00:26:43.720
<v Speaker 5>things that he pulled the bishops on first to prove

535
00:26:43.880 --> 00:26:46.519
<v Speaker 5>that Vatican One was not a new lone ranger view

536
00:26:46.519 --> 00:26:47.039
<v Speaker 5>of the pope.

537
00:26:47.400 --> 00:26:48.400
<v Speaker 4>He's not an autocrat.

538
00:26:48.680 --> 00:26:51.079
<v Speaker 5>It's just a quick way of safeguard or something that

539
00:26:51.119 --> 00:26:53.680
<v Speaker 5>was always taught the bishops.

540
00:26:54.279 --> 00:26:56.759
<v Speaker 4>He did claim to be an autocrat. He fully claimed that.

541
00:26:57.079 --> 00:27:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Clarify my point. He is not deciding that he wants

542
00:27:01.720 --> 00:27:03.559
<v Speaker 2>gay marriage when he says it. He is sitting in

543
00:27:03.559 --> 00:27:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the chair and saying what the church believes, based on

544
00:27:06.039 --> 00:27:06.839
<v Speaker 2>what the church believes.

545
00:27:06.920 --> 00:27:09.319
<v Speaker 5>That your point, well, the church doesn't have gay marriage,

546
00:27:09.400 --> 00:27:10.200
<v Speaker 5>never has never en.

547
00:27:10.519 --> 00:27:12.799
<v Speaker 2>My point is if the pope went to a chair

548
00:27:12.839 --> 00:27:15.160
<v Speaker 2>and said there is no gay marriage, it's not that

549
00:27:15.200 --> 00:27:18.039
<v Speaker 2>he's deciding it. He's saying, this is what the Church

550
00:27:18.200 --> 00:27:19.440
<v Speaker 2>has always held to be true.

551
00:27:19.440 --> 00:27:23.799
<v Speaker 5>Precisely, yeah, and that's what everyone misunderstands at Pastor attornis

552
00:27:23.880 --> 00:27:25.640
<v Speaker 5>Vatican One the most important thing?

553
00:27:25.640 --> 00:27:28.039
<v Speaker 2>And so hold on, sorry, And then it would sound

554
00:27:28.079 --> 00:27:30.839
<v Speaker 2>to me the issue of removing a pope would be

555
00:27:31.119 --> 00:27:34.039
<v Speaker 2>if he was clearly stating things that were fallible untruths

556
00:27:34.200 --> 00:27:34.799
<v Speaker 2>from the chair.

557
00:27:34.920 --> 00:27:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, the first question, yes, correct, is the notion of

558
00:27:37.759 --> 00:27:41.839
<v Speaker 3>that authority, whether he actually possesses the Vatican One authority.

559
00:27:41.920 --> 00:27:45.720
<v Speaker 3>That Tim is reading back into the many examples that

560
00:27:45.839 --> 00:27:50.160
<v Speaker 3>contradict his reading. For example, Pope Vigilius is literally excomunicated

561
00:27:50.160 --> 00:27:53.440
<v Speaker 3>and suspended at the Fifth Ecumenical Council. That's from Richard Price,

562
00:27:53.480 --> 00:27:57.880
<v Speaker 3>the famous Catholic scholars translation of the Acts of the Council.

563
00:27:58.400 --> 00:28:01.839
<v Speaker 3>And so the argument is not that the pope has

564
00:28:01.920 --> 00:28:05.839
<v Speaker 3>no relationship to the bishops, so he deflected and defeated

565
00:28:05.880 --> 00:28:08.880
<v Speaker 3>a strawman. The argument is that at the time of

566
00:28:08.920 --> 00:28:12.519
<v Speaker 3>the Fifth Ecumenical Council, the Pope submitted to and was

567
00:28:12.559 --> 00:28:16.759
<v Speaker 3>excommunicated by the council. And then now at Vatican One,

568
00:28:16.920 --> 00:28:20.319
<v Speaker 3>it says the literal opposite that no council is above

569
00:28:20.599 --> 00:28:23.440
<v Speaker 3>or can't fire the pope. So it's a complete contradiction,

570
00:28:23.480 --> 00:28:26.240
<v Speaker 3>and it's not just Vigilius. Tim said in his opening

571
00:28:26.240 --> 00:28:30.680
<v Speaker 3>statement that the Church via the roman Sea cannot defect.

572
00:28:30.759 --> 00:28:33.160
<v Speaker 3>If it could, it would lose one of its constituent components.

573
00:28:33.480 --> 00:28:36.799
<v Speaker 3>And yet at the next Ecumenical Council, the sixth Council,

574
00:28:36.960 --> 00:28:39.079
<v Speaker 3>Pope Honorius famously is a heretic.

575
00:28:39.119 --> 00:28:39.839
<v Speaker 6>He did defect.

576
00:28:39.880 --> 00:28:42.519
<v Speaker 3>All he did was write one letter that contained heretical statements,

577
00:28:42.759 --> 00:28:46.000
<v Speaker 3>and the Church at that council said he is a Heritic.

578
00:28:46.079 --> 00:28:50.119
<v Speaker 3>He's defected, and then three subsequent councils after also reaffirmed

579
00:28:50.160 --> 00:28:52.920
<v Speaker 3>that condemnation. So again, indefectibility.

580
00:28:53.640 --> 00:28:54.400
<v Speaker 6>The notion of.

581
00:28:54.359 --> 00:28:58.559
<v Speaker 3>Authority is all fluctuating and elastic, depending upon what Tim

582
00:28:58.599 --> 00:29:00.640
<v Speaker 3>needs to be the case at the time. His only

583
00:29:00.640 --> 00:29:02.960
<v Speaker 3>answer was a too quotua and he didn't address any

584
00:29:02.960 --> 00:29:03.400
<v Speaker 3>of the things that.

585
00:29:03.400 --> 00:29:11.160
<v Speaker 4>I want to build on what he just said too,

586
00:29:11.279 --> 00:29:15.839
<v Speaker 4>Because if if Enorious had declared monothelitism ex Cathedral to

587
00:29:15.839 --> 00:29:17.759
<v Speaker 4>be the truth, what would you have to believe?

588
00:29:18.039 --> 00:29:20.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, the claim of the Church is that the church

589
00:29:21.000 --> 00:29:22.759
<v Speaker 5>is indefectible. This is Christ's promise.

590
00:29:24.039 --> 00:29:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Roman Sea is ineffectible. Says the Roman sea is indefectible. Okay,

591
00:29:27.480 --> 00:29:31.599
<v Speaker 3>the Roman Sea is indefectible. Insofar as this this requires interpretation.

592
00:29:32.039 --> 00:29:35.440
<v Speaker 3>What if you get an honorious What if you get Yeah,

593
00:29:35.680 --> 00:29:37.920
<v Speaker 3>if you get it's a system.

594
00:29:38.039 --> 00:29:41.640
<v Speaker 5>The theological opinion, whether we're going to Suarez or Bellaman

595
00:29:41.799 --> 00:29:45.960
<v Speaker 5>or Francis Xavier, theological opinion can vary on this because

596
00:29:46.400 --> 00:29:47.400
<v Speaker 5>what what happens?

597
00:29:47.440 --> 00:29:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Then? Obviously we know the church has to be one.

598
00:29:50.519 --> 00:29:52.720
<v Speaker 5>It's got to be whole holy, it's got to be Catholic,

599
00:29:52.720 --> 00:29:55.079
<v Speaker 5>it's got to be Apostolic the Roman.

600
00:29:54.960 --> 00:29:57.519
<v Speaker 4>Church, why does it have to respect the pope? At

601
00:29:57.640 --> 00:29:59.559
<v Speaker 4>least let me get an emerald prince.

602
00:29:59.640 --> 00:30:01.599
<v Speaker 5>I don't to talk to two two barking dogs, so

603
00:30:01.680 --> 00:30:03.119
<v Speaker 5>let let me just let me get it out.

604
00:30:03.839 --> 00:30:05.440
<v Speaker 4>We have to make these things really clear.

605
00:30:05.519 --> 00:30:08.880
<v Speaker 3>First, Jodd Nelson's getting met uh more of a bobcat

606
00:30:08.920 --> 00:30:13.279
<v Speaker 3>really uh And I see it too, primacial authority everywhere.

607
00:30:13.319 --> 00:30:16.200
<v Speaker 5>What what does this mean to you, Tim if you

608
00:30:16.240 --> 00:30:20.119
<v Speaker 5>were to hear Constantinople three, Because if you're if your claim,

609
00:30:20.119 --> 00:30:22.400
<v Speaker 5>if the claim is that I'm expanding upon the view,

610
00:30:22.880 --> 00:30:25.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, the Catholic view of of what the Orthodox

611
00:30:25.960 --> 00:30:27.839
<v Speaker 5>view of popes might have been in the first millennium.

612
00:30:27.880 --> 00:30:32.960
<v Speaker 5>Then just explain what this language means, that that the

613
00:30:33.440 --> 00:30:35.839
<v Speaker 5>Church has never aired from the path of apostolic tradition,

614
00:30:35.920 --> 00:30:38.960
<v Speaker 5>nor she's been depraved by yielding to heretical innovations. But

615
00:30:39.039 --> 00:30:41.799
<v Speaker 5>from the beginning she has received the Christian faith from

616
00:30:41.799 --> 00:30:44.440
<v Speaker 5>her founders, the princes of the Apostles of Christ, and

617
00:30:44.519 --> 00:30:47.319
<v Speaker 5>remains undefiled to the end according to the divine promise

618
00:30:47.359 --> 00:30:50.279
<v Speaker 5>of the Lord and Savior himself. Now, because there are

619
00:30:50.559 --> 00:30:52.960
<v Speaker 5>there are bad popes in history, there are lots of them.

620
00:30:53.000 --> 00:30:57.359
<v Speaker 4>We've had two hundred thirty seven, not just you have to.

621
00:30:57.480 --> 00:31:00.799
<v Speaker 5>Differentiate between which you know one in this audience ten percent,

622
00:31:02.000 --> 00:31:05.160
<v Speaker 5>between material and formal heretics, right, which is going to

623
00:31:05.200 --> 00:31:06.839
<v Speaker 5>take another five minutes. I'm not going to get out

624
00:31:06.839 --> 00:31:08.759
<v Speaker 5>what i want to say because I'm defending this position.

625
00:31:09.039 --> 00:31:12.160
<v Speaker 5>Look at Constantinople four. You can't have material heretics, you

626
00:31:12.160 --> 00:31:15.079
<v Speaker 5>can't have formal heretics. Constant Nople four. What does this

627
00:31:15.160 --> 00:31:18.319
<v Speaker 5>mean to you? This is a the the eight hundred

628
00:31:18.319 --> 00:31:20.839
<v Speaker 5>and seventy nine version. It was originally convened in eight

629
00:31:20.960 --> 00:31:23.079
<v Speaker 5>sixty nine. That's the Catholic version. I'm reading from the

630
00:31:23.200 --> 00:31:26.200
<v Speaker 5>Orthodox document. Listen to this, What do you do with this?

631
00:31:26.400 --> 00:31:29.279
<v Speaker 5>For just the Apostolic throne, having received the keys of

632
00:31:29.319 --> 00:31:31.559
<v Speaker 5>the Kingdom of Heaven from the First and Great High

633
00:31:31.599 --> 00:31:34.920
<v Speaker 5>Priest Jesus Christ, through the chief of the Apostles, Peter,

634
00:31:35.480 --> 00:31:39.119
<v Speaker 5>he has the authority of universal binding and loosing. Binding

635
00:31:39.119 --> 00:31:42.440
<v Speaker 5>and loosing is the power to forgive sins, which Protestants

636
00:31:42.480 --> 00:31:45.359
<v Speaker 5>don't have at all. Orthodox have it. But except this

637
00:31:45.440 --> 00:31:48.519
<v Speaker 5>is an Orthodox document, this is an Orthodox council. We

638
00:31:48.559 --> 00:31:51.319
<v Speaker 5>hold this council to him, he Peter, that's my whole.

639
00:31:51.319 --> 00:31:54.839
<v Speaker 4>We have this council. If he don't disagree with you. You

640
00:31:54.799 --> 00:31:57.319
<v Speaker 4>don't have bishops, Yes, we do. The guy in the room,

641
00:31:57.359 --> 00:31:59.079
<v Speaker 4>we do have bishops. And they go all the way

642
00:31:59.119 --> 00:32:00.599
<v Speaker 4>back to Aristobola. They're Britain.

643
00:32:00.680 --> 00:32:04.440
<v Speaker 5>What does this mean to you, Bishop? And as the

644
00:32:04.519 --> 00:32:07.799
<v Speaker 5>authority of universal binding and loosing? They say, this is

645
00:32:07.880 --> 00:32:13.839
<v Speaker 5>just a symbolic power. Jolli honorific. It's merely first emoment.

646
00:32:14.000 --> 00:32:15.720
<v Speaker 5>Now now hold on, if you're appealed to.

647
00:32:16.119 --> 00:32:18.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that all twelve apostles have the power to

648
00:32:18.279 --> 00:32:22.160
<v Speaker 4>forgive sin, of course, of course, but only one has

649
00:32:22.319 --> 00:32:26.440
<v Speaker 4>what's called here at in this particular council the power

650
00:32:26.480 --> 00:32:29.279
<v Speaker 4>of universal binding and loosing, which is why you would

651
00:32:29.279 --> 00:32:32.119
<v Speaker 4>appeal to a pope to excommunicate the second in charge

652
00:32:32.119 --> 00:32:34.119
<v Speaker 4>of the church. You have to get you have to

653
00:32:34.160 --> 00:32:34.839
<v Speaker 4>tell me how.

654
00:32:34.839 --> 00:32:37.599
<v Speaker 3>And that's why a council can excommunicate the post, because

655
00:32:37.599 --> 00:32:39.200
<v Speaker 3>the councils above communicate.

656
00:32:39.559 --> 00:32:43.759
<v Speaker 4>I just read the bishops are above the.

657
00:32:43.799 --> 00:32:48.119
<v Speaker 3>Pot The acts of the council say the Julius was excommunicated.

658
00:32:48.359 --> 00:32:50.559
<v Speaker 3>Your translation of your people say he was.

659
00:32:50.599 --> 00:32:53.279
<v Speaker 2>I would like to hear from you, guys, what about

660
00:32:53.319 --> 00:32:57.759
<v Speaker 2>the arguments you've made or believe makes your denomination superior

661
00:32:58.400 --> 00:33:00.799
<v Speaker 2>in the true sense of the word superior. Are you

662
00:33:00.839 --> 00:33:03.599
<v Speaker 2>saying that it's because you are right, you are correct,

663
00:33:04.200 --> 00:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>or is there something about your belief that inherently better

664
00:33:07.240 --> 00:33:09.440
<v Speaker 2>serves the people and God.

665
00:33:09.039 --> 00:33:10.720
<v Speaker 4>The I mean, just to be very clear, the Anglican

666
00:33:10.759 --> 00:33:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Catholic position, and by extension, the Methodist position, because Methodists

667
00:33:14.440 --> 00:33:18.039
<v Speaker 4>are Anglicans, is that the Methodist Church, the Anglican Church,

668
00:33:18.079 --> 00:33:20.839
<v Speaker 4>all of them. They're not the superior, one true church.

669
00:33:21.279 --> 00:33:25.319
<v Speaker 4>They are a group of Christians in their genuine, best effort,

670
00:33:25.440 --> 00:33:29.640
<v Speaker 4>attempting to follow Christ in the most proper way possible.

671
00:33:29.839 --> 00:33:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Using the seven Ecumenical councils using the seven sacraments. We

672
00:33:33.119 --> 00:33:36.559
<v Speaker 4>are Catholic up until the end of the eleventh century.

673
00:33:36.680 --> 00:33:40.400
<v Speaker 4>Why what happened then we began to disagree with the pope?

674
00:33:40.839 --> 00:33:43.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's a long process. The Reformation did not

675
00:33:43.400 --> 00:33:44.519
<v Speaker 4>happen in fifteen seven.

676
00:33:44.359 --> 00:33:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Eleventh century. A pope came in who was saying stuff

677
00:33:46.319 --> 00:33:47.240
<v Speaker 2>that was like way wrong.

678
00:33:47.759 --> 00:33:49.839
<v Speaker 4>I would argue it started with Gregory the seventh, probably

679
00:33:49.839 --> 00:33:52.720
<v Speaker 4>with the Dictatus pape and him coming out and because

680
00:33:52.720 --> 00:33:56.359
<v Speaker 4>of a literal political situation, this was not a theological issue.

681
00:33:56.440 --> 00:33:58.000
<v Speaker 4>If here's a political.

682
00:33:57.799 --> 00:34:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Question, you're an Anglican, then do you agree with the

683
00:34:00.799 --> 00:34:01.599
<v Speaker 3>Anglican Catholic?

684
00:34:02.680 --> 00:34:03.559
<v Speaker 6>I don't agree with the branch.

685
00:34:03.640 --> 00:34:05.079
<v Speaker 4>Can you elaborate on the branch theory?

686
00:34:05.200 --> 00:34:08.079
<v Speaker 3>It's the typical Anglin idea that the Church is split

687
00:34:08.119 --> 00:34:09.719
<v Speaker 3>amongst a bunch of different branches.

688
00:34:10.440 --> 00:34:12.280
<v Speaker 4>I think I think that would probably.

689
00:34:12.920 --> 00:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that any of the people who compose

690
00:34:15.039 --> 00:34:18.320
<v Speaker 3>the documents and the canons at the seven Ecumenical councils

691
00:34:18.360 --> 00:34:20.840
<v Speaker 3>believe that the Church was divided amongst a bunch of

692
00:34:20.840 --> 00:34:21.679
<v Speaker 3>different sects?

693
00:34:22.079 --> 00:34:27.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't, well, I I mean orthodox.

694
00:34:27.119 --> 00:34:31.199
<v Speaker 3>Now, could you name anybody that believed that about the

695
00:34:31.280 --> 00:34:32.079
<v Speaker 3>nature of the church.

696
00:34:33.280 --> 00:34:34.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that I would agree that it was

697
00:34:34.800 --> 00:34:37.280
<v Speaker 4>necessarily divided into several sects. And I don't know that

698
00:34:37.320 --> 00:34:38.559
<v Speaker 4>my church would agree with that either.

699
00:34:38.599 --> 00:34:41.239
<v Speaker 3>I think, don't you agree with the idea that Protestants

700
00:34:41.280 --> 00:34:43.400
<v Speaker 3>are trying their best and whether they're Methodists or whether

701
00:34:43.400 --> 00:34:44.679
<v Speaker 3>they're Anglican doesn't really matter.

702
00:34:45.360 --> 00:34:47.719
<v Speaker 4>No, I would say that there are Protestant sects that

703
00:34:47.760 --> 00:34:48.559
<v Speaker 4>are is.

704
00:34:48.559 --> 00:34:51.000
<v Speaker 3>The church divided amongst those branches.

705
00:34:53.360 --> 00:34:54.079
<v Speaker 4>Today? Yes?

706
00:34:54.360 --> 00:34:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, did anyone in those seven councils have that idea

707
00:34:57.880 --> 00:34:58.320
<v Speaker 3>about the.

708
00:34:58.320 --> 00:34:59.079
<v Speaker 6>Nature of the church.

709
00:34:59.400 --> 00:35:01.920
<v Speaker 4>No, But I'll so don't think that your so, your.

710
00:35:01.800 --> 00:35:04.199
<v Speaker 3>Church is not in communion with those ideas.

711
00:35:04.760 --> 00:35:06.760
<v Speaker 4>My church is not in communicant with the Anglican communion.

712
00:35:07.760 --> 00:35:09.960
<v Speaker 4>We're we're not Anglicans. We're Anglican Catholics.

713
00:35:10.000 --> 00:35:13.360
<v Speaker 3>We hold our asking you about the first thousand years

714
00:35:13.440 --> 00:35:15.039
<v Speaker 3>of Christianity, yes.

715
00:35:14.840 --> 00:35:16.639
<v Speaker 4>We have, but you have a we are in agreement

716
00:35:16.679 --> 00:35:17.840
<v Speaker 4>with all seven you're.

717
00:35:17.800 --> 00:35:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Not because you just you couldn't name anybody that had

718
00:35:20.440 --> 00:35:21.880
<v Speaker 3>your ecclesiology of those.

719
00:35:23.039 --> 00:35:25.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we're having I don't think we're having converse.

720
00:35:26.000 --> 00:35:28.079
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you should get on this conversation and answer the question,

721
00:35:28.199 --> 00:35:29.519
<v Speaker 3>because that's what we're doing here today.

722
00:35:30.639 --> 00:35:32.920
<v Speaker 4>The terminology you're using is confusing to me.

723
00:35:33.039 --> 00:35:34.559
<v Speaker 6>Is common no.

724
00:35:36.000 --> 00:35:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Ecclesiology that the people the first thousand years had, Did

725
00:35:39.760 --> 00:35:41.639
<v Speaker 3>anyone of them have a branch theory?

726
00:35:41.719 --> 00:35:44.320
<v Speaker 6>Or that the church is divided amongst a bunch of groups.

727
00:35:45.800 --> 00:35:48.199
<v Speaker 4>Again, I don't think we're having the same conversation. I

728
00:35:48.239 --> 00:35:49.960
<v Speaker 4>think we got off base at a certain point here.

729
00:35:50.039 --> 00:35:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Does your ecclesiology have any basis in the first thousand years?

730
00:35:52.920 --> 00:35:55.719
<v Speaker 4>Yes, we trace all of our ecclesiology back to the

731
00:35:55.760 --> 00:35:56.519
<v Speaker 4>first thousand.

732
00:35:56.360 --> 00:35:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Name a church father or or a council that has

733
00:35:59.480 --> 00:36:01.440
<v Speaker 3>your branch the review of the church.

734
00:36:01.960 --> 00:36:05.599
<v Speaker 4>I think branch theory is where we're having a disagreement here.

735
00:36:05.679 --> 00:36:08.599
<v Speaker 3>It's a classic Anglican term for the nature of the church.

736
00:36:08.679 --> 00:36:11.880
<v Speaker 3>That's how they justified their reformation position. So tell me

737
00:36:11.920 --> 00:36:14.079
<v Speaker 3>one church father or a council that has that position

738
00:36:14.079 --> 00:36:16.719
<v Speaker 3>about the church is a very simple question, I I

739
00:36:16.840 --> 00:36:17.280
<v Speaker 3>off the top.

740
00:36:18.079 --> 00:36:19.880
<v Speaker 4>So it's a historical Off the top of my head,

741
00:36:19.880 --> 00:36:20.960
<v Speaker 4>I can't give you answer.

742
00:36:21.760 --> 00:36:25.400
<v Speaker 5>With Jay's asking him for people out there listening about

743
00:36:25.400 --> 00:36:29.599
<v Speaker 5>a historical When when a Protestant claims that I'm with

744
00:36:29.639 --> 00:36:31.679
<v Speaker 5>the Church. I was with the Church the same way

745
00:36:31.679 --> 00:36:35.760
<v Speaker 5>that the Orthodox were until ten fifty four. Set aside

746
00:36:36.360 --> 00:36:40.400
<v Speaker 5>who excommunicated whom for a second. They might agree in

747
00:36:40.519 --> 00:36:44.079
<v Speaker 5>abstracted which is why I called it abstract enlightenment rationalism.

748
00:36:44.239 --> 00:36:47.119
<v Speaker 5>They might agree in abstracted with what was going on,

749
00:36:47.519 --> 00:36:49.679
<v Speaker 5>you know, with the Orthodox or with the Catholics. They

750
00:36:49.719 --> 00:36:52.199
<v Speaker 5>might favor They're always going to favor the Orthodox because

751
00:36:52.239 --> 00:36:54.559
<v Speaker 5>none of these groups like the pope or the unity

752
00:36:54.599 --> 00:36:58.360
<v Speaker 5>required by a papacy. But what Jay was asking here

753
00:36:58.480 --> 00:37:03.159
<v Speaker 5>is for it to be true Christianity, true true Christianity

754
00:37:03.159 --> 00:37:04.079
<v Speaker 5>in its truest.

755
00:37:03.760 --> 00:37:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Sense, it's got to be one holy, Catholic and Apostolic.

756
00:37:06.440 --> 00:37:09.480
<v Speaker 5>There's a problem for the one mark and the Catholic

757
00:37:09.519 --> 00:37:13.920
<v Speaker 5>mark for Orthodox. But Orthodox are actually Christian in so

758
00:37:14.079 --> 00:37:17.880
<v Speaker 5>far as they have the seven Sacraments and all of

759
00:37:17.920 --> 00:37:21.320
<v Speaker 5>their bishops can be traced back to one of the apostles.

760
00:37:21.800 --> 00:37:23.719
<v Speaker 4>That's what he was asking about ecclesiology.

761
00:37:24.320 --> 00:37:26.719
<v Speaker 5>So when they say, all, I agree with this, but no,

762
00:37:26.880 --> 00:37:30.639
<v Speaker 5>no Protestant has the seven sacraments or a bishop.

763
00:37:30.960 --> 00:37:33.280
<v Speaker 4>We have the seven sacraments, I have bishops.

764
00:37:33.599 --> 00:37:36.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna I'm gonna get very reductive and simplify everything

765
00:37:37.239 --> 00:37:39.679
<v Speaker 2>to a ridiculous degree and ask questions that maybe are

766
00:37:39.920 --> 00:37:44.719
<v Speaker 2>ridiculously rudimentary for the Christian. Do you guys all like

767
00:37:44.800 --> 00:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to like Mosaic law, laws of Leviticus,

768
00:37:48.880 --> 00:37:52.679
<v Speaker 2>do you all follow those or are they considered archaic?

769
00:37:52.960 --> 00:37:55.320
<v Speaker 2>How does the Old Testament play a role in how

770
00:37:55.320 --> 00:37:56.199
<v Speaker 2>you live your lives.

771
00:37:56.000 --> 00:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And what rules you follow?

772
00:37:57.280 --> 00:38:00.159
<v Speaker 4>We have we're under the New Covenant. We yeah, So

773
00:38:00.159 --> 00:38:00.880
<v Speaker 4>what does that mean?

774
00:38:01.039 --> 00:38:04.679
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know, like the New Testament, So the

775
00:38:04.760 --> 00:38:05.880
<v Speaker 2>laws of Leviticus, don't know?

776
00:38:06.280 --> 00:38:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the laws of Leviticus are specifically made for a

777
00:38:09.000 --> 00:38:12.039
<v Speaker 4>very specific period in Jewish history, and there are that

778
00:38:12.199 --> 00:38:15.159
<v Speaker 4>Jesus does not come to erase the law. He comes

779
00:38:15.239 --> 00:38:19.280
<v Speaker 4>to fulfill the law. So his position in the hierarchy

780
00:38:19.400 --> 00:38:22.079
<v Speaker 4>is not as somebody who washes things away, it's somebody

781
00:38:22.119 --> 00:38:24.800
<v Speaker 4>who fulfills it. The law was basically a series of

782
00:38:24.840 --> 00:38:27.239
<v Speaker 4>things that Jews had to do to stay in communion

783
00:38:27.280 --> 00:38:30.280
<v Speaker 4>with God. Christ gives us a different set of rules.

784
00:38:30.320 --> 00:38:32.800
<v Speaker 4>That doesn't mean we'd ignore everything, but it means we

785
00:38:32.840 --> 00:38:35.199
<v Speaker 4>take his authority over the old law.

786
00:38:35.239 --> 00:38:38.840
<v Speaker 2>So does that mean that when it comes to all

787
00:38:38.920 --> 00:38:42.440
<v Speaker 2>of the old Testament's rules. Are there some that remain

788
00:38:42.760 --> 00:38:46.239
<v Speaker 2>based on Jesus said outright, these are still to remain,

789
00:38:46.239 --> 00:38:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and these are not to remain. How do you and

790
00:38:48.760 --> 00:38:50.119
<v Speaker 2>this is not a question, how do you know which

791
00:38:50.960 --> 00:38:54.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't imagine that Jesus addressed literally every single rule

792
00:38:54.320 --> 00:38:54.559
<v Speaker 2>or law.

793
00:38:54.599 --> 00:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you know which ones to fobiably?

794
00:38:56.880 --> 00:38:57.000
<v Speaker 6>Well?

795
00:38:57.079 --> 00:38:59.519
<v Speaker 3>One way we disagree with him is to a degree,

796
00:38:59.599 --> 00:39:02.159
<v Speaker 3>not totally, but I mean Orthodox and Catholics agree that

797
00:39:02.199 --> 00:39:04.840
<v Speaker 3>there is an oral tradition that's passed on from the apostles.

798
00:39:04.880 --> 00:39:07.159
<v Speaker 3>So you have with the written text of the New Testament,

799
00:39:07.199 --> 00:39:09.679
<v Speaker 3>which the early Church didn't have a Bible, they had

800
00:39:10.119 --> 00:39:13.039
<v Speaker 3>some documents, they had some letters, and they had tradition,

801
00:39:13.119 --> 00:39:15.480
<v Speaker 3>and they had the church service, so everything was kind

802
00:39:15.480 --> 00:39:15.880
<v Speaker 3>of done.

803
00:39:15.760 --> 00:39:17.239
<v Speaker 6>In a liturgical service way.

804
00:39:17.679 --> 00:39:21.280
<v Speaker 3>You would be getting catechized orally, and then eventually the

805
00:39:21.320 --> 00:39:25.039
<v Speaker 3>Bible gets collected in later centuries to be the canon.

806
00:39:25.079 --> 00:39:28.360
<v Speaker 3>But so basically, tradition and the Bible lets you know

807
00:39:29.039 --> 00:39:30.800
<v Speaker 3>what things carry over and what don't. And that's one

808
00:39:30.840 --> 00:39:33.519
<v Speaker 3>of the reasons why the councils have Church law. So

809
00:39:33.639 --> 00:39:35.440
<v Speaker 3>church law kind of helps interpret that.

810
00:39:35.599 --> 00:39:37.199
<v Speaker 1>So I have a question. I'm prively pouncing this wrong.

811
00:39:37.239 --> 00:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But how do you all view who to writes?

812
00:39:40.000 --> 00:39:42.360
<v Speaker 6>Is it the word Anabaptists?

813
00:39:42.400 --> 00:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Like, yeah, yeah, how do you how do y'all view them?

814
00:39:44.360 --> 00:39:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Are they we.

815
00:39:45.280 --> 00:39:46.679
<v Speaker 6>Would say they're heterodox.

816
00:39:46.760 --> 00:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're outside of the.

817
00:39:50.079 --> 00:39:52.639
<v Speaker 2>I think you guys would all agree it's a documinish

818
00:39:53.800 --> 00:39:57.480
<v Speaker 2>So this is going to be a kindergartener level. Uh,

819
00:39:58.079 --> 00:40:01.320
<v Speaker 2>you know urban liberals argument for the Christians right now?

820
00:40:01.320 --> 00:40:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Why I say this, but is it not one of

821
00:40:03.920 --> 00:40:05.840
<v Speaker 2>the instructions of God to be fruitful and multiply?

822
00:40:06.639 --> 00:40:06.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

823
00:40:07.000 --> 00:40:09.159
<v Speaker 2>Sure, So we're having a conversation over what is the

824
00:40:09.159 --> 00:40:11.119
<v Speaker 2>the superior denomination?

825
00:40:11.559 --> 00:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Watch look it up. I don't think Mormons count no

826
00:40:15.519 --> 00:40:16.360
<v Speaker 1>offense to Mormons.

827
00:40:16.440 --> 00:40:19.239
<v Speaker 2>I think for the purpose of this debate, Mormons are

828
00:40:19.239 --> 00:40:20.400
<v Speaker 2>a different area.

829
00:40:20.599 --> 00:40:23.320
<v Speaker 4>They're right, Mormons are nontrinitarian. They don't believe in the

830
00:40:23.360 --> 00:40:24.079
<v Speaker 4>same God that we do.

831
00:40:24.320 --> 00:40:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Pentecostals have a two point one fertility rate and hooter

832
00:40:29.000 --> 00:40:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Rightes have six to two seven fertility rate. After that,

833
00:40:34.039 --> 00:40:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Conservative Protestants one point eight, Catholics one point nine, Orthodox

834
00:40:37.519 --> 00:40:41.559
<v Speaker 2>one point nine. Jovah's witness slight less than two Protestants

835
00:40:41.639 --> 00:40:45.519
<v Speaker 2>one point five to one point six. Liberal Protestants one

836
00:40:45.519 --> 00:40:49.719
<v Speaker 2>point five and unaffiliated Christians one point three to one

837
00:40:49.719 --> 00:40:54.400
<v Speaker 2>point eight. So the Pentecostals and hutter Rights, according to

838
00:40:54.639 --> 00:40:58.559
<v Speaker 2>just a cursorysearch, are the only actual groups that are

839
00:40:58.599 --> 00:41:02.039
<v Speaker 2>being fruitful and multiplying, and that's to be honest, only

840
00:41:02.079 --> 00:41:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the Hooterites, the Amish, Anabaptists, everybody else and having kids.

841
00:41:08.000 --> 00:41:10.159
<v Speaker 3>I think traditional Catholics are having kids.

842
00:41:10.800 --> 00:41:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh, just a cursor research, it is around one point

843
00:41:13.480 --> 00:41:14.960
<v Speaker 2>nine two. I thought it was a little higher than that.

844
00:41:14.960 --> 00:41:17.199
<v Speaker 4>There's not much of a difference between our three sects.

845
00:41:17.519 --> 00:41:18.519
<v Speaker 1>Y'all ain't having kids.

846
00:41:18.760 --> 00:41:20.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, if you go to multiply, what are you going

847
00:41:20.840 --> 00:41:23.119
<v Speaker 5>with the Tridentine Latin mass It's a very different group.

848
00:41:23.199 --> 00:41:25.480
<v Speaker 4>And I'm going to ask Chchi and know it's going

849
00:41:25.559 --> 00:41:28.400
<v Speaker 4>to be above the part I do. I do really quickly.

850
00:41:28.440 --> 00:41:29.800
<v Speaker 4>While he's doing that, I want to come back because

851
00:41:29.800 --> 00:41:31.440
<v Speaker 4>I will have an opportunity to sit down and think

852
00:41:31.440 --> 00:41:33.440
<v Speaker 4>about the branch theory thing. Do you not have a

853
00:41:33.480 --> 00:41:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Russian Orthodox, a Greek Orthodox An Orthodox Church in America?

854
00:41:37.199 --> 00:41:38.360
<v Speaker 6>Those are not branches.

855
00:41:38.440 --> 00:41:42.199
<v Speaker 3>It's not at all the same ecclesiology of Anglican branch theory.

856
00:41:42.280 --> 00:41:43.880
<v Speaker 4>That's all I would point out that branch theory is

857
00:41:43.880 --> 00:41:44.880
<v Speaker 4>not dogmatic.

858
00:41:45.400 --> 00:41:47.559
<v Speaker 6>It's but I was just looking for whatever it was.

859
00:41:47.800 --> 00:41:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I know. But the Anglican position is that we were

860
00:41:50.840 --> 00:41:53.880
<v Speaker 4>part of the one true, Holy Apostolic Catholic Church, and

861
00:41:53.920 --> 00:41:56.079
<v Speaker 4>then you're not and then that church.

862
00:41:56.320 --> 00:41:57.320
<v Speaker 6>What's dogma in your church?

863
00:41:57.320 --> 00:41:59.480
<v Speaker 4>How do you determine it the same way that Catholics

864
00:41:59.519 --> 00:42:02.800
<v Speaker 4>and Orthodox But we don't have we no longer have

865
00:42:02.840 --> 00:42:03.480
<v Speaker 4>a pope, but we are.

866
00:42:04.039 --> 00:42:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Councils of bishops, So how do you determine them?

867
00:42:06.079 --> 00:42:07.239
<v Speaker 4>We have councils of bishops?

868
00:42:08.199 --> 00:42:09.599
<v Speaker 6>Okay, but what's a dogma?

869
00:42:09.719 --> 00:42:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Like?

870
00:42:09.840 --> 00:42:11.119
<v Speaker 6>Do you accept icons?

871
00:42:11.440 --> 00:42:13.679
<v Speaker 4>No? Well, yes, we were not iconoclasts.

872
00:42:14.079 --> 00:42:16.199
<v Speaker 3>Well, but is it a dogma or is it an opinion?

873
00:42:16.199 --> 00:42:18.679
<v Speaker 4>Because most of the same position as the Roman Catholic Church.

874
00:42:18.760 --> 00:42:21.800
<v Speaker 3>No, you don't because Orthodox and a Roman Catholics excommunicate

875
00:42:21.800 --> 00:42:25.400
<v Speaker 3>people that don't believe in imagery, and most Protestants historically

876
00:42:25.440 --> 00:42:28.320
<v Speaker 3>have allowed it to be something that's an opinion audio offer.

877
00:42:28.440 --> 00:42:29.880
<v Speaker 4>There is a lot of pious opinion.

878
00:42:30.280 --> 00:42:32.280
<v Speaker 6>So is it a dogma or not? That's the question.

879
00:42:32.559 --> 00:42:35.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure exactly what icons. I don't believe that

880
00:42:35.239 --> 00:42:38.519
<v Speaker 4>we excommunicate people for thinking that icons, so.

881
00:42:38.480 --> 00:42:40.559
<v Speaker 3>It's not a dogma, and thus many of the basics

882
00:42:40.599 --> 00:42:41.800
<v Speaker 3>are not actually settled in.

883
00:42:42.719 --> 00:42:45.880
<v Speaker 4>It depends on the if we're in again, I'm not

884
00:42:45.920 --> 00:42:48.639
<v Speaker 4>as well versed on the specifics of the councils, but

885
00:42:48.719 --> 00:42:50.519
<v Speaker 4>if it's in this first seven councils, we're in the

886
00:42:50.559 --> 00:42:51.920
<v Speaker 4>same We're of the same opinion.

887
00:42:52.000 --> 00:42:54.800
<v Speaker 5>But the problem with your ecclesiology is that when there

888
00:42:54.840 --> 00:42:56.159
<v Speaker 5>are no leaders, right, I mean.

889
00:42:56.159 --> 00:42:58.519
<v Speaker 4>We have bishops, we have archbishops. I don't know why

890
00:42:58.519 --> 00:42:59.159
<v Speaker 4>we keep coming to the.

891
00:42:59.159 --> 00:43:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Bishops that that can trace the lineage, yes, way back

892
00:43:01.960 --> 00:43:02.199
<v Speaker 5>to one.

893
00:43:02.199 --> 00:43:04.400
<v Speaker 4>We can trace back to Augustin of Britain, and we

894
00:43:04.400 --> 00:43:08.480
<v Speaker 4>can trace back to ball Orthodox and Roman Catholics. Our

895
00:43:08.519 --> 00:43:10.320
<v Speaker 4>bishops traced back to the first century a d.

896
00:43:10.440 --> 00:43:10.880
<v Speaker 6>In Britain.

897
00:43:11.159 --> 00:43:15.199
<v Speaker 4>Okay that according to your if you have a totally no, no,

898
00:43:15.239 --> 00:43:17.559
<v Speaker 4>it's not a broken lineage. The church remained in Britain

899
00:43:17.800 --> 00:43:19.159
<v Speaker 4>even after the Saxons got.

900
00:43:19.000 --> 00:43:21.559
<v Speaker 5>They're identifying as an Anglican Catholic today, yes, or you're

901
00:43:21.599 --> 00:43:22.679
<v Speaker 5>identifying as a Methodist.

902
00:43:22.679 --> 00:43:25.079
<v Speaker 4>I'm identifying as a Methodist who is inquiring into the

903
00:43:25.119 --> 00:43:27.719
<v Speaker 4>Anglican Catholic Church getting later this year. I mean this

904
00:43:28.000 --> 00:43:29.920
<v Speaker 4>is part of the pitch right now, we're having a

905
00:43:30.039 --> 00:43:32.960
<v Speaker 4>historical discussion. I am a historian, but we're having a

906
00:43:33.000 --> 00:43:36.039
<v Speaker 4>conversation about history right now. So your church recognizes the

907
00:43:36.119 --> 00:43:38.559
<v Speaker 4>risk of ballast of Britain. Your church recognizes the risk time.

908
00:43:38.599 --> 00:43:40.199
<v Speaker 3>You're a historian, but you didn't know about branch theory,

909
00:43:40.199 --> 00:43:41.280
<v Speaker 3>which is like the number one.

910
00:43:41.440 --> 00:43:45.159
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a religious historian. I'm a historian on medieval

911
00:43:45.199 --> 00:43:48.840
<v Speaker 4>historian specifically. So when we're looking at this arista, Ballus

912
00:43:48.960 --> 00:43:51.480
<v Speaker 4>is the earliest week can go back with the Anglican

913
00:43:51.480 --> 00:43:55.320
<v Speaker 4>Catholic Church because of the union between the churches in

914
00:43:55.400 --> 00:44:00.519
<v Speaker 4>Kent andology. No not, I I know that's that's fair.

915
00:44:00.599 --> 00:44:04.320
<v Speaker 5>It's just you're not You're not a faithful representatively both

916
00:44:04.320 --> 00:44:05.440
<v Speaker 5>in your church is acknowledgeious?

917
00:44:05.800 --> 00:44:06.159
<v Speaker 6>We don't.

918
00:44:06.400 --> 00:44:09.000
<v Speaker 3>We don't acknowledge your ecclesiology. You understand that from the

919
00:44:09.079 --> 00:44:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Orthodox perspective, it doesn't matter if you have a laying

920
00:44:11.920 --> 00:44:13.440
<v Speaker 3>on of hands.

921
00:44:13.039 --> 00:44:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Is Augustine legitimate?

922
00:44:14.079 --> 00:44:16.480
<v Speaker 3>If you leave the faith of the church, none of that.

923
00:44:16.519 --> 00:44:18.199
<v Speaker 6>From the Orthodox perspective.

924
00:44:17.920 --> 00:44:21.639
<v Speaker 4>I can't leave the faith the church. That's our position.

925
00:44:21.800 --> 00:44:22.599
<v Speaker 6>I know your position.

926
00:44:22.639 --> 00:44:27.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying from our position, our ecclesiology doesn't recognize your ecclesiology,

927
00:44:27.280 --> 00:44:30.159
<v Speaker 3>nor does his. They think that Anglican orders are invalid

928
00:44:30.239 --> 00:44:31.280
<v Speaker 3>via the other thirteenth.

929
00:44:31.320 --> 00:44:33.960
<v Speaker 4>That's so, that's because that's what's convenient to their theology.

930
00:44:33.960 --> 00:44:35.960
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't actually have any sort of I'm.

931
00:44:35.800 --> 00:44:38.599
<v Speaker 3>Saying that either of us recognizes your lineage, and I

932
00:44:38.719 --> 00:44:40.639
<v Speaker 3>understand that you think that it's there, But that's why

933
00:44:40.960 --> 00:44:41.280
<v Speaker 3>is there.

934
00:44:41.360 --> 00:44:43.480
<v Speaker 4>That's why it all the way back to only.

935
00:44:43.239 --> 00:44:47.719
<v Speaker 3>On the basis of your ecclesiology, and presupposing we haven't lineage.

936
00:44:47.320 --> 00:44:50.079
<v Speaker 4>We know we have an ordination that goes on.

937
00:44:50.000 --> 00:44:52.039
<v Speaker 6>The basis of your ecclesiology.

938
00:44:52.079 --> 00:44:54.000
<v Speaker 5>You understand people out there and need to understand that

939
00:44:54.000 --> 00:44:57.840
<v Speaker 5>there there There is such a thing as Apostolic sacramental Christianity.

940
00:44:58.199 --> 00:45:01.039
<v Speaker 5>The Roman Catholic Church has wrote on this in two

941
00:45:01.079 --> 00:45:03.679
<v Speaker 5>thousand and four and in the nineties as well. We

942
00:45:03.800 --> 00:45:07.119
<v Speaker 5>acknowledge that you can call the Orthodox Church's churches with

943
00:45:07.199 --> 00:45:10.519
<v Speaker 5>a capital. See, they have bishops, they go back to apostles,

944
00:45:10.559 --> 00:45:14.480
<v Speaker 5>they have seven sacraments represented acknowledged by the Church.

945
00:45:14.519 --> 00:45:15.679
<v Speaker 4>They're valid sacraments.

946
00:45:16.559 --> 00:45:19.000
<v Speaker 5>You wouldn't belicit for a Catholic to receive there or

947
00:45:19.079 --> 00:45:23.159
<v Speaker 5>vice versa. But there is a shared ecclesiology. What people

948
00:45:23.199 --> 00:45:27.480
<v Speaker 5>don't understand and need to about Protestantism. Anglican Catholics are

949
00:45:27.760 --> 00:45:31.239
<v Speaker 5>slightly different. They're an exception to the rule. But of

950
00:45:31.320 --> 00:45:35.400
<v Speaker 5>all the sects of Protestantism, they don't share any ecclesiology

951
00:45:35.440 --> 00:45:37.079
<v Speaker 5>with us. So they'll say, oh, this is a dogma.

952
00:45:37.199 --> 00:45:39.360
<v Speaker 5>What's a dogma? This isn't something that traces back to

953
00:45:39.440 --> 00:45:42.960
<v Speaker 5>the acta Apostolic ascetis. It's not something that the bishop's

954
00:45:43.079 --> 00:45:45.159
<v Speaker 5>always and everywhere taught together as a church.

955
00:45:45.800 --> 00:45:47.519
<v Speaker 4>So we have to just say this.

956
00:45:47.519 --> 00:45:50.880
<v Speaker 5>It's not to be exclusive, but Protestantism is a lay

957
00:45:52.159 --> 00:45:55.920
<v Speaker 5>bastardization of the religion. You guys believe in a Trinitarian

958
00:45:56.400 --> 00:45:59.400
<v Speaker 5>you have a Trinitarian baptism, baptism in the name of

959
00:45:59.440 --> 00:46:02.480
<v Speaker 5>the Father Son, Holy Spirit. So so it is technically Christian.

960
00:46:02.920 --> 00:46:07.039
<v Speaker 5>But except beyond that and baptism even in Roman Catholicism

961
00:46:07.079 --> 00:46:08.960
<v Speaker 5>can be done by a layman, which is what makes

962
00:46:09.000 --> 00:46:14.440
<v Speaker 5>it valid. But other than that, Protestantism is an abstract idea.

963
00:46:14.519 --> 00:46:17.840
<v Speaker 5>I like the idea, I like this book that the Roman.

964
00:46:18.440 --> 00:46:22.920
<v Speaker 4>So it's you think we're talking about Protestantism that is

965
00:46:22.960 --> 00:46:24.039
<v Speaker 4>a big tense.

966
00:46:23.920 --> 00:46:25.800
<v Speaker 3>You're part of that that domain.

967
00:46:26.079 --> 00:46:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but the Anglican Protestantism is very different from the

968
00:46:28.519 --> 00:46:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Lutheran Protestism, which is very different from the reform projects.

969
00:46:30.960 --> 00:46:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Was my original point, right, there's not actually any clear

970
00:46:33.559 --> 00:46:35.320
<v Speaker 3>unity there. It's all over the place.

971
00:46:35.519 --> 00:46:37.320
<v Speaker 4>No Protestant is going to tell you that there is

972
00:46:37.400 --> 00:46:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Protestant unity.

973
00:46:39.239 --> 00:46:39.599
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

974
00:46:39.639 --> 00:46:43.360
<v Speaker 4>They're going to tell you protism. No, no, it doesn't.

975
00:46:43.519 --> 00:46:46.159
<v Speaker 5>Council and I see you guys must be one holy

976
00:46:46.280 --> 00:46:49.039
<v Speaker 5>Catholic and apostology that does those four marks has a

977
00:46:49.159 --> 00:46:50.280
<v Speaker 5>very specific.

978
00:46:49.800 --> 00:46:51.519
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't mean that we have to be in communion with

979
00:46:51.519 --> 00:46:52.239
<v Speaker 4>one another.

980
00:46:52.039 --> 00:46:54.159
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, it means you have to have those marks.

981
00:46:56.159 --> 00:46:59.199
<v Speaker 4>We have bishops, we have the sacraments, we have the history.

982
00:46:59.199 --> 00:47:01.400
<v Speaker 6>It's bishop td takes a bishop. He claims to be one.

983
00:47:01.599 --> 00:47:03.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't know who TD Jakes is.

984
00:47:04.800 --> 00:47:06.320
<v Speaker 6>Woman the black.

985
00:47:06.800 --> 00:47:10.360
<v Speaker 3>He's the black modalist preacher who says he's Bishop td Jakes.

986
00:47:10.880 --> 00:47:12.920
<v Speaker 4>The bishop doesn't sound like he is.

987
00:47:13.000 --> 00:47:14.519
<v Speaker 6>Okay, but you're a bishop.

988
00:47:14.840 --> 00:47:18.079
<v Speaker 4>Your church has My church has bishops because they can

989
00:47:18.119 --> 00:47:20.639
<v Speaker 4>trace their ordination back to August.

990
00:47:21.079 --> 00:47:22.760
<v Speaker 1>The seventh time the question has been asked and he's

991
00:47:22.760 --> 00:47:23.840
<v Speaker 1>answered the exact same thing.

992
00:47:24.239 --> 00:47:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Because he's but he's not understanding that you're not.

993
00:47:26.880 --> 00:47:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Going to get you.

994
00:47:27.320 --> 00:47:29.599
<v Speaker 4>Guys aren't asking a question that makes sense. Why why

995
00:47:29.599 --> 00:47:31.039
<v Speaker 4>do you have ordinations? Because we do?

996
00:47:31.280 --> 00:47:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Okay.

997
00:47:31.760 --> 00:47:35.800
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's an interesting view between the three

998
00:47:35.840 --> 00:47:39.280
<v Speaker 2>of you and what a superior denomination would be. And

999
00:47:39.320 --> 00:47:42.519
<v Speaker 2>it's largely about what you think to be true to

1000
00:47:42.599 --> 00:47:46.599
<v Speaker 2>the religion as opposed to what the religion does and

1001
00:47:46.719 --> 00:47:48.039
<v Speaker 2>what it's its adherents do.

1002
00:47:48.679 --> 00:47:50.519
<v Speaker 1>I I And that's fine.

1003
00:47:50.519 --> 00:47:52.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying I don't want to diminish that, because

1004
00:47:52.239 --> 00:47:54.280
<v Speaker 2>obviously that's extremely important to know that, to know the

1005
00:47:54.280 --> 00:47:56.320
<v Speaker 2>truth and and and you know the history of things.

1006
00:47:56.599 --> 00:47:59.199
<v Speaker 2>But from my perspective, I take a look at the

1007
00:47:59.199 --> 00:48:01.400
<v Speaker 2>adherence to the really and what they're doing and whether

1008
00:48:01.480 --> 00:48:03.559
<v Speaker 2>they can actually follow what they're being told to do,

1009
00:48:03.760 --> 00:48:08.239
<v Speaker 2>and it largely feels like they mostly don't. I mean again,

1010
00:48:08.320 --> 00:48:09.960
<v Speaker 2>like if I was going to go off with the

1011
00:48:10.000 --> 00:48:13.400
<v Speaker 2>sheer numbers, I'm more convinced to be Homish than anything

1012
00:48:13.440 --> 00:48:15.000
<v Speaker 2>right right, anything else right now.

1013
00:48:15.280 --> 00:48:17.639
<v Speaker 5>The problem is Gandhi. Gandhi said the same thing. He said,

1014
00:48:17.639 --> 00:48:19.519
<v Speaker 5>if I ever met a perfect Christian, I would go

1015
00:48:19.559 --> 00:48:22.960
<v Speaker 5>be You don't. There's some validity to the proposition by

1016
00:48:22.960 --> 00:48:24.880
<v Speaker 5>a lord and that you judge a tree by.

1017
00:48:25.320 --> 00:48:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I got my point is this? So I looked up

1018
00:48:27.360 --> 00:48:32.159
<v Speaker 2>the fastest growing denominations. The Independent Network of Charismatic Christianity

1019
00:48:32.199 --> 00:48:37.400
<v Speaker 2>is the largest growth, apparently, followed by Pentecostal churches. Good God,

1020
00:48:37.920 --> 00:48:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Pentecostals have like between three to five percent growth.

1021
00:48:43.400 --> 00:48:46.639
<v Speaker 4>You understand the inverse proportionalism at work there though. It's

1022
00:48:46.760 --> 00:48:49.480
<v Speaker 4>that they're small, so they can grow really really fat.

1023
00:48:49.519 --> 00:48:51.360
<v Speaker 4>If the town's got one hundred people and it gets

1024
00:48:51.360 --> 00:48:55.159
<v Speaker 4>two new people, it just increased its population by two percent.

1025
00:48:56.280 --> 00:48:58.599
<v Speaker 4>Catholic also Pentecostals. It's terrifying.

1026
00:48:58.960 --> 00:49:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Also the the way the debate is framed, which is

1027
00:49:02.000 --> 00:49:06.000
<v Speaker 3>not bad, but superior begs the question of like what standard,

1028
00:49:06.280 --> 00:49:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Like what do you what's the metric for judging?

1029
00:49:08.360 --> 00:49:09.119
<v Speaker 6>What makes it suppear?

1030
00:49:09.199 --> 00:49:12.199
<v Speaker 4>I would argue the superior, like, the superior religion is

1031
00:49:12.199 --> 00:49:14.440
<v Speaker 4>the one that brings the most people to salvation.

1032
00:49:14.800 --> 00:49:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, but maybe what's maybe truth is first and

1033
00:49:18.400 --> 00:49:20.199
<v Speaker 3>foremost I think for most of us or all of

1034
00:49:20.280 --> 00:49:22.920
<v Speaker 3>us here. Yeah, that because we assume that the true

1035
00:49:22.920 --> 00:49:26.679
<v Speaker 3>religion will bear the fruits that go along with what's

1036
00:49:26.719 --> 00:49:31.159
<v Speaker 3>true first and foremost. So just having numbers isn't necessarily

1037
00:49:31.239 --> 00:49:33.679
<v Speaker 3>an indicator of the true religion, because you can have

1038
00:49:33.679 --> 00:49:36.119
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people who convert to a false religion

1039
00:49:36.239 --> 00:49:39.199
<v Speaker 3>or who think that they're converting and it's really just

1040
00:49:39.239 --> 00:49:42.480
<v Speaker 3>like Santarea or something like that by South America. That's

1041
00:49:42.519 --> 00:49:43.599
<v Speaker 3>not authentic, right.

1042
00:49:43.519 --> 00:49:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So to be fair, I want to make sure of

1043
00:49:44.800 --> 00:49:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, right.

1044
00:49:45.960 --> 00:49:48.079
<v Speaker 2>I just I just looked up Catholic to make the

1045
00:49:48.119 --> 00:49:51.280
<v Speaker 2>point about inverse three point nine million people in twenty

1046
00:49:51.280 --> 00:49:54.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty three became Catholic, whereas Pentecosta was fifty nine fifty

1047
00:49:54.360 --> 00:49:57.440
<v Speaker 2>six thousand. So yeah, it's correct, And I'll look up

1048
00:49:57.480 --> 00:49:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the other sex as well, because likely the same thing

1049
00:49:59.840 --> 00:50:03.239
<v Speaker 2>for for Orthodox they're much larger, so the percentage wise

1050
00:50:03.280 --> 00:50:07.119
<v Speaker 2>is going to be smaller. But I guess my ultimate

1051
00:50:07.159 --> 00:50:11.800
<v Speaker 2>concern is the initial point of the question of superior

1052
00:50:11.840 --> 00:50:13.679
<v Speaker 2>religion is I think, as you put, who brings people

1053
00:50:13.679 --> 00:50:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to salvation? Obviously the truth of the religion is going

1054
00:50:16.480 --> 00:50:18.599
<v Speaker 2>to matter, because, like you said, if they're practicing Santa Ria.

1055
00:50:18.599 --> 00:50:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Then they're not going anywhere.

1056
00:50:19.960 --> 00:50:23.280
<v Speaker 2>But there's also the fact that, I mean, largely among

1057
00:50:23.320 --> 00:50:25.440
<v Speaker 2>all of your sex people are not having kids at all,

1058
00:50:26.000 --> 00:50:27.440
<v Speaker 2>or I should say they're having kids, but they're having

1059
00:50:27.519 --> 00:50:33.599
<v Speaker 2>not enough, so you can keep converting, but eventually there's

1060
00:50:33.639 --> 00:50:34.079
<v Speaker 2>no people.

1061
00:50:34.079 --> 00:50:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, where where does this ultimately go?

1062
00:50:35.679 --> 00:50:40.440
<v Speaker 5>Fair metric in some political sense, but it's also soteriologically

1063
00:50:40.880 --> 00:50:43.559
<v Speaker 5>who goes to heaven or not. It's a bit of

1064
00:50:43.559 --> 00:50:46.880
<v Speaker 5>a crass metric. We don't we should be having lots

1065
00:50:46.880 --> 00:50:51.039
<v Speaker 5>of kids. And obviously Roman Catholicism is marked as the

1066
00:50:51.079 --> 00:50:57.000
<v Speaker 5>only solidified version of Christianity on earth that stayed against

1067
00:50:57.840 --> 00:51:02.039
<v Speaker 5>contraception after the Anglican l Ambeth Conferences of nineteen ten,

1068
00:51:02.119 --> 00:51:05.039
<v Speaker 5>nineteen twenty, nineteen thirty, where all the other sects of

1069
00:51:05.119 --> 00:51:09.360
<v Speaker 5>Christianity capitulated. But it's true, and it's fair enough for

1070
00:51:09.440 --> 00:51:12.880
<v Speaker 5>people to say, particularly after Vatican two and the liberalizing

1071
00:51:12.960 --> 00:51:18.199
<v Speaker 5>trends popular trends among Catholics, almost as many Catholics contracept

1072
00:51:18.320 --> 00:51:20.239
<v Speaker 5>as Protestants or Orthodox.

1073
00:51:20.679 --> 00:51:21.480
<v Speaker 4>This isn't quite true.

1074
00:51:21.480 --> 00:51:23.639
<v Speaker 5>If you go to a Tredentian Latin Mass, you're going

1075
00:51:23.719 --> 00:51:25.280
<v Speaker 5>to see big, big, big families.

1076
00:51:25.679 --> 00:51:28.440
<v Speaker 4>But which Day pointed out, But I do.

1077
00:51:28.360 --> 00:51:30.719
<v Speaker 5>Think that everyone should, each of the three of us

1078
00:51:30.760 --> 00:51:34.519
<v Speaker 5>here should have a segment to state.

1079
00:51:34.920 --> 00:51:37.119
<v Speaker 4>But you know, some sort of answer to.

1080
00:51:37.079 --> 00:51:40.960
<v Speaker 5>The posit if that's cool, Like, what what's your case

1081
00:51:41.039 --> 00:51:45.320
<v Speaker 5>for why you are the best version of Christianity, best

1082
00:51:45.400 --> 00:51:45.920
<v Speaker 5>major side.

1083
00:51:46.159 --> 00:51:47.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't hold a position that we are. We just

1084
00:51:47.880 --> 00:51:54.360
<v Speaker 4>hold a position that you're not. That's incredibly weak and weak.

1085
00:51:54.800 --> 00:51:58.159
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of Mennonites around here and the Rock.

1086
00:51:58.280 --> 00:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>They're awesome.

1087
00:51:59.159 --> 00:52:03.039
<v Speaker 2>They have animals, They sell food. It's always like real food,

1088
00:52:03.079 --> 00:52:07.000
<v Speaker 2>no chemicals, no garbage. They got big families and these

1089
00:52:07.519 --> 00:52:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I looked it up that the main the moderate Mennonite state.

1090
00:52:10.079 --> 00:52:12.199
<v Speaker 2>There's a shop not too far away twenty minutes we

1091
00:52:12.280 --> 00:52:13.440
<v Speaker 2>used to go to all the time. They got ice

1092
00:52:13.440 --> 00:52:16.199
<v Speaker 2>cream and cheeses and it's all this really great stuff.

1093
00:52:16.239 --> 00:52:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I love it. That seems pretty cool, you know, so

1094
00:52:19.519 --> 00:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>if I was trying to figure.

1095
00:52:20.719 --> 00:52:21.440
<v Speaker 6>Out which one.

1096
00:52:21.559 --> 00:52:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well my point is largely.

1097
00:52:23.079 --> 00:52:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Like looking at the world today and the state of things,

1098
00:52:28.519 --> 00:52:31.639
<v Speaker 2>they make a pretty good argument. You know, don't eat garbage,

1099
00:52:31.679 --> 00:52:34.159
<v Speaker 2>be with your family, honor like they tend to honor

1100
00:52:34.199 --> 00:52:36.519
<v Speaker 2>their families, their communities, their parents, They go to church.

1101
00:52:36.559 --> 00:52:38.760
<v Speaker 2>They maintain this. They have lots lots of kids. Yeah,

1102
00:52:38.800 --> 00:52:40.599
<v Speaker 2>I know they're small, it's only a few million.

1103
00:52:41.000 --> 00:52:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, can I address that, because there's two points. It

1104
00:52:43.800 --> 00:52:45.519
<v Speaker 3>actually addressed the point I was trying to make to

1105
00:52:45.519 --> 00:52:47.320
<v Speaker 3>you earlier. So, like, if you go back to the

1106
00:52:47.320 --> 00:52:49.199
<v Speaker 3>early Church, there was a group called the Arians, and

1107
00:52:49.199 --> 00:52:52.519
<v Speaker 3>the Arians believed that Jesus was a creature. But the

1108
00:52:52.599 --> 00:52:56.079
<v Speaker 3>Arans were also very into morality and pushing morals, so

1109
00:52:56.119 --> 00:52:59.519
<v Speaker 3>they were at least outwardly speaking moral kind of like

1110
00:52:59.559 --> 00:53:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Jose this as you could say. But Arians had apostolic succession,

1111
00:53:04.440 --> 00:53:07.280
<v Speaker 3>but they lost the church and the faith even though

1112
00:53:07.280 --> 00:53:11.760
<v Speaker 3>they had the mechanical succession. Likewise, Christianity can't be identified

1113
00:53:11.800 --> 00:53:16.079
<v Speaker 3>as hutter rights or amish because historical. It's a historic religion,

1114
00:53:16.519 --> 00:53:19.840
<v Speaker 3>so it has to be tied to the historic succession

1115
00:53:19.960 --> 00:53:23.599
<v Speaker 3>not just of the bishops, but the apostles that Jesus

1116
00:53:23.639 --> 00:53:26.519
<v Speaker 3>appointed in the Gospel to hand down that authority and

1117
00:53:26.639 --> 00:53:29.760
<v Speaker 3>that rulership of the church. So when you look at

1118
00:53:29.840 --> 00:53:32.760
<v Speaker 3>the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh centuries, you

1119
00:53:32.800 --> 00:53:35.400
<v Speaker 3>don't see anything like anglic Catholicism. You don't see anything

1120
00:53:35.400 --> 00:53:38.400
<v Speaker 3>like hutter rights or Amish. You see people coming together

1121
00:53:38.519 --> 00:53:42.239
<v Speaker 3>having councils with bishops, with the eucharists, with monastics, with

1122
00:53:43.079 --> 00:53:46.639
<v Speaker 3>you know, the episcopacy, with you relics with all the

1123
00:53:46.639 --> 00:53:51.519
<v Speaker 3>things that characterize Catholic Christianity and Orthodox identify as.

1124
00:53:52.079 --> 00:53:54.360
<v Speaker 2>To be fair, though, I would argue that in those

1125
00:53:54.400 --> 00:53:57.159
<v Speaker 2>time periods, people were more likely to live in practice

1126
00:53:57.199 --> 00:53:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and worship as the Hutter rights.

1127
00:53:58.360 --> 00:54:02.199
<v Speaker 3>Do you know the church which is liturgical worship that

1128
00:54:02.239 --> 00:54:05.920
<v Speaker 3>you see with icons and incense is literally out of

1129
00:54:05.960 --> 00:54:08.360
<v Speaker 3>the Old Testament worship with that you mentioned earlier, like

1130
00:54:08.400 --> 00:54:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the levitical laws. The church adopted all of those, many

1131
00:54:12.920 --> 00:54:15.960
<v Speaker 3>of those ceremonial things like having the you know, the

1132
00:54:16.000 --> 00:54:19.840
<v Speaker 3>priests decked out the way he is with having an altar. Nope,

1133
00:54:20.360 --> 00:54:23.599
<v Speaker 3>like typically speaking, Baptists don't believe in an altar for

1134
00:54:23.639 --> 00:54:27.199
<v Speaker 3>the purpose of the Eucharistic offering, right, so Baptists believe

1135
00:54:27.199 --> 00:54:30.840
<v Speaker 3>in it being a purely symbolic remembrance ceremony. But the

1136
00:54:30.880 --> 00:54:35.920
<v Speaker 3>early Church is doing the liturgy. They're doing the Mass

1137
00:54:36.079 --> 00:54:40.119
<v Speaker 3>or the you know, the divine Liturgy from the earliest days.

1138
00:54:40.159 --> 00:54:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Everything he just described as what early Church Catholics did

1139
00:54:43.960 --> 00:54:47.239
<v Speaker 4>applies to Okay, it doesn't. I don't think he knows

1140
00:54:47.239 --> 00:54:48.440
<v Speaker 4>what Anglican Catholicism is.

1141
00:54:48.440 --> 00:54:50.840
<v Speaker 3>You didn't know the basics of Anglican ecclesiology.

1142
00:54:51.039 --> 00:54:53.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm not aware of a non dogmatic a.

1143
00:54:53.599 --> 00:54:55.760
<v Speaker 6>Very well known thing. You're not.

1144
00:54:56.320 --> 00:54:58.119
<v Speaker 3>It's your common doctrine of ecclesiology.

1145
00:54:58.159 --> 00:55:00.079
<v Speaker 6>You didn't know it. You're not gonna lecture me on Anglican.

1146
00:55:00.039 --> 00:55:02.239
<v Speaker 4>Also, don't. We also don't hold to the thirty nine

1147
00:55:02.320 --> 00:55:03.800
<v Speaker 4>articles as dogmatic.

1148
00:55:03.599 --> 00:55:04.599
<v Speaker 6>Because there's not dogma.

1149
00:55:04.639 --> 00:55:06.760
<v Speaker 7>As we showed a minute ago, the marks of the

1150
00:55:06.840 --> 00:55:11.079
<v Speaker 7>marks of natural religion qua religion are are really important

1151
00:55:11.079 --> 00:55:14.400
<v Speaker 7>here and they do set off a kind of rift

1152
00:55:14.440 --> 00:55:17.000
<v Speaker 7>where the Protestants are alone.

1153
00:55:17.039 --> 00:55:19.000
<v Speaker 4>They're they're a voice crying in the wilderness, and we

1154
00:55:19.079 --> 00:55:20.840
<v Speaker 4>have to acknowledge them. That's what I tried to acknowledge

1155
00:55:20.840 --> 00:55:23.519
<v Speaker 4>at the very beginning, the basic marks of religion. Even

1156
00:55:23.719 --> 00:55:26.519
<v Speaker 4>the Pagan Greeks had some of these. You would say

1157
00:55:26.519 --> 00:55:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Buddhism doesn't, Protestantism doesn't, but even some of the Polytheists

1158
00:55:30.840 --> 00:55:33.719
<v Speaker 4>religions do. They have things like smells and bells. Having

1159
00:55:33.760 --> 00:55:38.199
<v Speaker 4>an altar is something from even pagan Greek religion. But

1160
00:55:38.199 --> 00:55:42.280
<v Speaker 4>but for for incremental Jews. The Jews, Jews had them right.

1161
00:55:42.400 --> 00:55:48.000
<v Speaker 5>Sacramentals sacrifice, blood, blood sacrifice, which really from Judaism to

1162
00:55:48.079 --> 00:55:53.039
<v Speaker 5>Christianity became sacrament precepts, the you know, daily things you

1163
00:55:53.079 --> 00:55:55.679
<v Speaker 5>have to do. What are the five precepts of Catholicism,

1164
00:55:55.840 --> 00:55:57.440
<v Speaker 5>assasserdotal order.

1165
00:55:58.760 --> 00:56:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Or ritual or what we call what we call liturgy.

1166
00:56:02.920 --> 00:56:06.119
<v Speaker 5>These are things that are lacking in Protestantism. I'm not

1167
00:56:06.159 --> 00:56:09.199
<v Speaker 5>saying this to be rude or exclusive, but when you're

1168
00:56:09.199 --> 00:56:12.400
<v Speaker 5>dealing with what I actually say makes the Roman Catholic

1169
00:56:12.440 --> 00:56:16.519
<v Speaker 5>faith the superior form of Christianity is at the first

1170
00:56:16.599 --> 00:56:20.039
<v Speaker 5>ecumenical council ever, which was Nicia, where we defined the

1171
00:56:20.039 --> 00:56:24.639
<v Speaker 5>most important stuff about the Trinity. There were four marks

1172
00:56:24.679 --> 00:56:27.800
<v Speaker 5>of the Church laid out that Christ promised us the

1173
00:56:27.880 --> 00:56:29.960
<v Speaker 5>Church would never defect. It would be this way until

1174
00:56:29.960 --> 00:56:32.480
<v Speaker 5>the end of time. It would be one. So there

1175
00:56:32.519 --> 00:56:36.280
<v Speaker 5>can't be competing sex. There can be arguments within one sect,

1176
00:56:36.320 --> 00:56:39.800
<v Speaker 5>but there can't be actual different competing sex. Wholly this

1177
00:56:39.880 --> 00:56:47.639
<v Speaker 5>means sacraments Catholic, this means worldwide, and of course apostolic.

1178
00:56:47.719 --> 00:56:49.519
<v Speaker 5>This means that there has to be a direct line

1179
00:56:49.639 --> 00:56:51.880
<v Speaker 5>of every bishop in the world. Back to one of

1180
00:56:51.880 --> 00:56:56.239
<v Speaker 5>the apostles, we would say, with all due respect, Protestantism

1181
00:56:56.239 --> 00:56:59.199
<v Speaker 5>by and large lacks all four. Now we do not

1182
00:56:59.320 --> 00:57:01.719
<v Speaker 5>make the same. The Church doesn't make the same claim

1183
00:57:01.800 --> 00:57:06.679
<v Speaker 5>about Orthodox Christianity. They have real bishops that the Church acknowledges,

1184
00:57:07.039 --> 00:57:09.440
<v Speaker 5>and that means that they have all seven sacraments. Seven

1185
00:57:09.480 --> 00:57:13.440
<v Speaker 5>This means complete. So there's a different conversation that needs

1186
00:57:13.440 --> 00:57:15.960
<v Speaker 5>to happen between Catholics. You heard it because we're talking

1187
00:57:15.960 --> 00:57:19.880
<v Speaker 5>about the first seven Councils versus a kind of quasi

1188
00:57:19.960 --> 00:57:20.920
<v Speaker 5>religious products.

1189
00:57:21.119 --> 00:57:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Once again, we acknowledge and hold the First seven Councils,

1190
00:57:23.880 --> 00:57:24.440
<v Speaker 4>but you don't.

1191
00:57:24.519 --> 00:57:27.519
<v Speaker 3>As I showed from the Seventh Documenical Council, you fundamentally

1192
00:57:27.559 --> 00:57:29.679
<v Speaker 3>reject the thing that that council was about.

1193
00:57:29.719 --> 00:57:30.840
<v Speaker 6>You said, it's audiopera.

1194
00:57:31.239 --> 00:57:33.519
<v Speaker 3>They say you're excommunicated if you don't accept images, So

1195
00:57:33.559 --> 00:57:34.760
<v Speaker 3>you don't accept the seventh.

1196
00:57:36.199 --> 00:57:37.400
<v Speaker 6>In theory and name.

1197
00:57:37.360 --> 00:57:39.480
<v Speaker 1>What are you?

1198
00:57:39.840 --> 00:57:40.440
<v Speaker 6>That was what you said.

1199
00:57:40.440 --> 00:57:43.559
<v Speaker 4>If I said that we if we.

1200
00:57:43.599 --> 00:57:47.280
<v Speaker 6>Have dogma, you don't know that these terms, I.

1201
00:57:47.239 --> 00:57:50.199
<v Speaker 4>Said, okay, No, if I said that we don't agree

1202
00:57:50.239 --> 00:57:52.599
<v Speaker 4>with the Seventh Council, then I misspoke because.

1203
00:57:52.400 --> 00:57:53.599
<v Speaker 6>Of no, you said that.

1204
00:57:53.800 --> 00:57:56.519
<v Speaker 3>I asked you if it was dogma meaning you're excommunicated

1205
00:57:56.519 --> 00:57:58.039
<v Speaker 3>if you don't believe in images, and you said no,

1206
00:57:58.079 --> 00:58:00.159
<v Speaker 3>we don't believe that, then you don't believe this the

1207
00:58:00.199 --> 00:58:01.159
<v Speaker 3>council because it does that.

1208
00:58:02.079 --> 00:58:03.280
<v Speaker 6>It's a simple point.

1209
00:58:03.079 --> 00:58:06.679
<v Speaker 4>Because we don't excommunicate people for not as you don't

1210
00:58:06.719 --> 00:58:11.039
<v Speaker 4>have ecclesiologyesiology. But listen, I was gonna bring I want

1211
00:58:11.039 --> 00:58:11.639
<v Speaker 4>to bring in another.

1212
00:58:11.800 --> 00:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>We got another denomination.

1213
00:58:12.760 --> 00:58:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Who's got some words for you, Warpeg with a super

1214
00:58:15.400 --> 00:58:18.960
<v Speaker 2>test saying Baptists don't pray to middlemen and call them saints,

1215
00:58:19.000 --> 00:58:21.519
<v Speaker 2>and we don't pay for our salvation by giving Rome

1216
00:58:21.599 --> 00:58:24.719
<v Speaker 2>our coin. Long live American Independent Baptists.

1217
00:58:25.079 --> 00:58:28.960
<v Speaker 4>What say, y'all, that's got to be a joke, Rock, Yeah,

1218
00:58:28.599 --> 00:58:30.039
<v Speaker 4>that's so.

1219
00:58:30.079 --> 00:58:34.280
<v Speaker 3>In First Timothy, for Paul says to Timothy, be good, Timothy,

1220
00:58:34.320 --> 00:58:37.599
<v Speaker 3>because you will save those around you. Okay, does that

1221
00:58:37.679 --> 00:58:41.199
<v Speaker 3>mean that Paul thinks Timothy is the Savior. No, Timothy

1222
00:58:41.239 --> 00:58:45.480
<v Speaker 3>is participating in by cooperating with God, helping and being

1223
00:58:45.480 --> 00:58:47.920
<v Speaker 3>a conduit of grace to those around him in the

1224
00:58:47.960 --> 00:58:51.599
<v Speaker 3>same way Mary and other Saints are not God. They're

1225
00:58:51.679 --> 00:58:54.679
<v Speaker 3>conduits that pray for us and help us, exactly the

1226
00:58:54.719 --> 00:58:55.840
<v Speaker 3>way Paul's talking to Timothy.

1227
00:58:55.840 --> 00:58:57.840
<v Speaker 5>If you've ever asked your your buddy to pray for you,

1228
00:58:57.920 --> 00:59:00.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm going through something that's that's the Saints thing is

1229
00:59:00.800 --> 00:59:04.679
<v Speaker 5>absolutely retarded. Uh when when Protestants spurg out about this,

1230
00:59:04.800 --> 00:59:07.440
<v Speaker 5>it's it's literally asking the saints in heaven to pray

1231
00:59:07.440 --> 00:59:07.719
<v Speaker 5>for us.

1232
00:59:07.760 --> 00:59:08.840
<v Speaker 4>They're they're closer to God.

1233
00:59:08.880 --> 00:59:12.239
<v Speaker 5>It's the church triumphant rather than the people that if

1234
00:59:12.280 --> 00:59:13.119
<v Speaker 5>I ask you to pray for.

1235
00:59:13.079 --> 00:59:15.599
<v Speaker 4>Me, you're still a church militant. It's it's a closer

1236
00:59:15.599 --> 00:59:18.119
<v Speaker 4>prayer to get I'm just still confused on why icons

1237
00:59:18.119 --> 00:59:18.559
<v Speaker 4>are any show.

1238
00:59:18.599 --> 00:59:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but I don't want to because let let's just

1239
00:59:20.840 --> 00:59:23.800
<v Speaker 2>let's just we have icons, have icons.

1240
00:59:24.320 --> 00:59:26.440
<v Speaker 4>We have icons. If a church did not, If a

1241
00:59:26.559 --> 00:59:29.840
<v Speaker 4>church you're missing the icons, you not be recognized as

1242
00:59:29.840 --> 00:59:30.239
<v Speaker 4>a church.

1243
00:59:30.320 --> 00:59:31.960
<v Speaker 2>We we've, we've we I don't want to go in

1244
00:59:32.000 --> 00:59:33.199
<v Speaker 2>circles on that over and over and over again with

1245
00:59:33.199 --> 00:59:34.079
<v Speaker 2>everyone saying the same thing.

1246
00:59:34.199 --> 00:59:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So I have a question. I got a question. Do

1247
00:59:36.599 --> 00:59:39.599
<v Speaker 1>each of you think you will meet each other in

1248
00:59:39.639 --> 00:59:40.800
<v Speaker 1>heaven or no? Yes?

1249
00:59:41.480 --> 00:59:42.159
<v Speaker 4>My church does.

1250
00:59:42.880 --> 00:59:44.559
<v Speaker 3>Well. I guess it's true if you think that, right,

1251
00:59:45.320 --> 00:59:47.000
<v Speaker 3>If it's more liberal, does that I get true?

1252
00:59:47.119 --> 00:59:48.440
<v Speaker 4>It's not liberal. We are.

1253
00:59:48.960 --> 00:59:50.280
<v Speaker 6>It's a liberal position.

1254
00:59:50.639 --> 00:59:55.920
<v Speaker 4>It's not liberal liberal and a different saying you're a trinitarian,

1255
00:59:56.039 --> 00:59:57.039
<v Speaker 4>you're a trinitarian.

1256
00:59:57.159 --> 01:00:00.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm a truticized sacraments audio.

1257
01:00:00.360 --> 01:00:02.920
<v Speaker 4>My apostolic succession goes back just as far as yours

1258
01:00:02.920 --> 01:00:03.480
<v Speaker 4>and yours.

1259
01:00:04.159 --> 01:00:05.599
<v Speaker 6>All you've done is a start your position.

1260
01:00:05.679 --> 01:00:09.119
<v Speaker 4>So question just haven't rejected, You haven't actually rejected.

1261
01:00:09.199 --> 01:00:09.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna.

1262
01:00:09.800 --> 01:00:10.760
<v Speaker 6>I've already showed you twice.

1263
01:00:10.760 --> 01:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>We go, we gotta. I'm kidding, don't actually you you

1264
01:00:12.960 --> 01:00:15.239
<v Speaker 1>have You have said, you have said that.

1265
01:00:15.199 --> 01:00:16.679
<v Speaker 6>You even't understand the arguments I'm making.

1266
01:00:16.880 --> 01:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>TikTok.

1267
01:00:17.320 --> 01:00:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Your argument seems to be and you restate the argument.

1268
01:00:19.920 --> 01:00:24.039
<v Speaker 4>Your argument seems to be that if somebody doesn't have

1269
01:00:24.360 --> 01:00:25.280
<v Speaker 4>icons in their house.

1270
01:00:25.360 --> 01:00:27.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, okay, no I didn't. That is so dumb.

1271
01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:30.199
<v Speaker 4>That is you're not iconically.

1272
01:00:30.800 --> 01:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think these two gentlemen will meet you in heaven.

1273
01:00:33.360 --> 01:00:36.559
<v Speaker 3>We don't make personal judgments on people's destinies. All we

1274
01:00:36.639 --> 01:00:39.039
<v Speaker 3>know is that we believe that the Orthodox Church is

1275
01:00:39.039 --> 01:00:41.199
<v Speaker 3>the arc. It is the mystical body of Christ, and

1276
01:00:41.280 --> 01:00:43.400
<v Speaker 3>so it's our duty to tell people to join it.

1277
01:00:43.519 --> 01:00:45.880
<v Speaker 3>We can't say what God will judge at the end

1278
01:00:45.920 --> 01:00:47.639
<v Speaker 3>of time and at the grade, So let's.

1279
01:00:47.519 --> 01:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Put it this way.

1280
01:00:47.960 --> 01:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Outside of them individually, you think it is, it is

1281
01:00:50.840 --> 01:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>less likely that people who don't follow your religion will

1282
01:00:53.360 --> 01:00:54.360
<v Speaker 2>will find their way less likely.

1283
01:00:54.559 --> 01:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And then and then how do you guys view it?

1284
01:00:55.920 --> 01:01:00.480
<v Speaker 5>Catholics highly similar, almost identical view. We do believe you

1285
01:01:00.519 --> 01:01:04.320
<v Speaker 5>have to be in communion with Rome, but there are

1286
01:01:04.480 --> 01:01:07.280
<v Speaker 5>exceptions like baptism by desire.

1287
01:01:07.320 --> 01:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Does everyone agree that the Holy Land belongs to Rome?

1288
01:01:11.079 --> 01:01:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Rome depends on how you define Rome.

1289
01:01:13.679 --> 01:01:16.119
<v Speaker 3>I think parts of the Holy Land along to Orthodox

1290
01:01:16.199 --> 01:01:19.519
<v Speaker 3>Orthodox ord Our Church is the third largest landowner in Israel,

1291
01:01:19.719 --> 01:01:23.480
<v Speaker 3>so technic Jerusalem patriarch, it would probably be the best claim.

1292
01:01:23.599 --> 01:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I was half kidding. It was a joke

1293
01:01:25.880 --> 01:01:28.199
<v Speaker 1>from Seamus when over the Israel Palestine debate.

1294
01:01:28.280 --> 01:01:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Ye belongs to Christians.

1295
01:01:30.840 --> 01:01:32.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean there was at one time in the Middle

1296
01:01:32.719 --> 01:01:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Ages it was a Byzantine it was it was part

1297
01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:37.039
<v Speaker 3>of the Business Empire, so it was at one point

1298
01:01:37.039 --> 01:01:38.880
<v Speaker 3>a Christian colony, so to speak.

1299
01:01:40.719 --> 01:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is there's a chat here. I'm gonna read

1300
01:01:43.079 --> 01:01:46.079
<v Speaker 1>that's that's I guess somewhat insulting to me.

1301
01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:50.679
<v Speaker 2>This h Bros Says this was always the problem with

1302
01:01:50.719 --> 01:01:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Tim hosting the debate. You know what's going to turn

1303
01:01:53.480 --> 01:01:57.519
<v Speaker 2>into something something he brings up with no epistemic foundation.

1304
01:01:59.159 --> 01:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh my view, it's kind of like, yeah, probably because

1305
01:02:02.519 --> 01:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't follow any of these religions or or I

1306
01:02:06.480 --> 01:02:09.320
<v Speaker 2>do believe in God. I guess theist is probably the

1307
01:02:09.360 --> 01:02:10.519
<v Speaker 2>best word, not deist.

1308
01:02:10.960 --> 01:02:11.679
<v Speaker 1>But if.

1309
01:02:13.119 --> 01:02:16.039
<v Speaker 2>If I can't be convinced, if you can't convince, you know,

1310
01:02:16.199 --> 01:02:18.039
<v Speaker 2>if you find somebody you're like, yeah, they believe in God,

1311
01:02:18.079 --> 01:02:22.079
<v Speaker 2>it's like, okay, here's why we're correct. If it's esoteric

1312
01:02:22.159 --> 01:02:24.920
<v Speaker 2>and hard to understand and you can't easily explain why

1313
01:02:24.920 --> 01:02:28.599
<v Speaker 2>your religion is correct to someone like me, and how

1314
01:02:28.599 --> 01:02:29.400
<v Speaker 2>do you convert people?

1315
01:02:29.400 --> 01:02:31.639
<v Speaker 3>But a Muslim that's a Muslim market. Muslims will say

1316
01:02:31.679 --> 01:02:34.280
<v Speaker 3>our religion is true because it's simpler. But then when

1317
01:02:34.320 --> 01:02:36.599
<v Speaker 3>you get into the religion, you realize, oh, actually there's

1318
01:02:36.599 --> 01:02:38.360
<v Speaker 3>a million hadiths that you got to learn, and it's

1319
01:02:38.400 --> 01:02:39.079
<v Speaker 3>really complex.

1320
01:02:39.320 --> 01:02:41.519
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I'm saying, how do you convince someone who

1321
01:02:41.559 --> 01:02:45.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't know about the ecumenical councils and all of that stuff.

1322
01:02:45.360 --> 01:02:48.280
<v Speaker 2>So I hear I hear a lot of very esoteric

1323
01:02:48.400 --> 01:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>terms that I'm like, unam sanctum.

1324
01:02:50.840 --> 01:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that is.

1325
01:02:52.480 --> 01:02:55.440
<v Speaker 5>But Jays, I'm not trying to be evangelical right now,

1326
01:02:55.519 --> 01:02:57.719
<v Speaker 5>Jay is not. None of us really are trying to

1327
01:02:57.719 --> 01:03:00.280
<v Speaker 5>be evangelical, because when you bring everyone into a room,

1328
01:03:00.079 --> 01:03:02.679
<v Speaker 5>the Catholic and the Orthodox are going to be debating

1329
01:03:02.800 --> 01:03:06.599
<v Speaker 5>counsels and and specifically what the constitutions require. So it

1330
01:03:06.639 --> 01:03:09.800
<v Speaker 5>sounds boring and stupid, but but it's actually important the

1331
01:03:09.840 --> 01:03:12.639
<v Speaker 5>way anyone would evangelize, I guess, since you do have

1332
01:03:12.679 --> 01:03:18.559
<v Speaker 5>a more secular audiences by saying Christianity is demonstrably true,

1333
01:03:19.239 --> 01:03:23.239
<v Speaker 5>I was demonstrably suey generous, it's under but I'll pause on.

1334
01:03:23.199 --> 01:03:25.679
<v Speaker 2>Saying I think it's probably like eighty five percent Christian

1335
01:03:25.920 --> 01:03:27.639
<v Speaker 2>of different denominations that watch.

1336
01:03:28.239 --> 01:03:29.719
<v Speaker 4>Okay, yeah, well fair enough.

1337
01:03:29.840 --> 01:03:32.840
<v Speaker 5>But then you havestually you have to ask which which

1338
01:03:32.960 --> 01:03:35.480
<v Speaker 5>version of Christianity? To the eighty five percent that are

1339
01:03:35.519 --> 01:03:38.719
<v Speaker 5>already convinced correctly that Christianity is true, you have to say,

1340
01:03:38.719 --> 01:03:43.119
<v Speaker 5>which of the competing sex Orthodoxy is. We would say

1341
01:03:43.400 --> 01:03:46.960
<v Speaker 5>a much much, much much closer have the foremarks of

1342
01:03:47.039 --> 01:03:50.360
<v Speaker 5>the church and and can trace there the practice of

1343
01:03:50.360 --> 01:03:52.920
<v Speaker 5>the religion today all the way back to our Lord

1344
01:03:52.960 --> 01:03:56.320
<v Speaker 5>handing the keys to Blessed Peter. That's that's what we

1345
01:03:56.320 --> 01:03:58.360
<v Speaker 5>would say, if we're kind of putting it in broad

1346
01:03:58.360 --> 01:04:00.800
<v Speaker 5>forward facing terms. And then that's precisely way I.

1347
01:04:00.719 --> 01:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>See with with recently with the new pope.

1348
01:04:07.039 --> 01:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>He's from Chicago and a lot of Chicago jokes. But

1349
01:04:10.840 --> 01:04:14.239
<v Speaker 2>there was another cardinal who had made comments about supporting

1350
01:04:14.280 --> 01:04:15.559
<v Speaker 2>the LGBTQ community.

1351
01:04:16.039 --> 01:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I forgot.

1352
01:04:16.480 --> 01:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>He was the guy from the Philippines, and there was

1353
01:04:19.280 --> 01:04:25.480
<v Speaker 2>big concern over his views on overtly political cultural political issues.

1354
01:04:26.280 --> 01:04:27.679
<v Speaker 2>And to me, I look at that, I'm like, how

1355
01:04:27.920 --> 01:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>how could there be truth in an ever evolving political

1356
01:04:32.400 --> 01:04:34.599
<v Speaker 2>climate that tries to adhere to politics.

1357
01:04:35.079 --> 01:04:37.119
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's the biggest problem with Catholic Church historically is

1358
01:04:37.159 --> 01:04:39.719
<v Speaker 4>it's very intertwined with politics, always has been.

1359
01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:44.840
<v Speaker 2>My personally, my opinion is that the Catholic Church is

1360
01:04:44.920 --> 01:04:48.199
<v Speaker 2>trying to maintain as large a base as possible, and

1361
01:04:48.280 --> 01:04:50.320
<v Speaker 2>so you end up with people like Francis and I

1362
01:04:50.320 --> 01:04:52.719
<v Speaker 2>forgot the name of this guy, this Filipino guy who

1363
01:04:52.760 --> 01:04:56.239
<v Speaker 2>said something like all these gay websites, I mean literally

1364
01:04:56.320 --> 01:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>gay websites, not insulting them, we're.

1365
01:04:58.639 --> 01:04:59.360
<v Speaker 6>Pregnant vat.

1366
01:05:00.880 --> 01:05:03.519
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, there's like pink News.

1367
01:05:03.800 --> 01:05:06.159
<v Speaker 2>I think it was in like LGBT Nation or whatever.

1368
01:05:06.320 --> 01:05:08.480
<v Speaker 2>We're saying like, this is the good guy, he should

1369
01:05:08.480 --> 01:05:10.920
<v Speaker 2>be the pope because he was saying things like it's

1370
01:05:10.960 --> 01:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>time to recognize gay marriage or whatever, or like things

1371
01:05:13.960 --> 01:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>like that, going beyond what Francis had said with blessings.

1372
01:05:16.159 --> 01:05:19.599
<v Speaker 5>The Vaticanistas all said that this is what between him

1373
01:05:19.639 --> 01:05:23.239
<v Speaker 5>and the Cardinal of Bologna and some of the other

1374
01:05:23.320 --> 01:05:27.119
<v Speaker 5>far left cardinals that were considered papabularly popable at the

1375
01:05:27.199 --> 01:05:32.320
<v Speaker 5>last conclave last month. This is specifically why they weren't selected,

1376
01:05:32.400 --> 01:05:35.400
<v Speaker 5>even though they're considered most to pabaly, because we tried

1377
01:05:35.400 --> 01:05:38.519
<v Speaker 5>this with Francis, and it's true. It's I would never

1378
01:05:38.559 --> 01:05:40.719
<v Speaker 5>deny as probably one of one of France's is the

1379
01:05:40.719 --> 01:05:45.079
<v Speaker 5>best known American lay critics who is Catholic. Uh, the

1380
01:05:45.159 --> 01:05:52.639
<v Speaker 5>church is trying a bad approach to winning over converts.

1381
01:05:51.679 --> 01:05:53.639
<v Speaker 4>Since a little bit. It's like we're a Vatican too.

1382
01:05:53.679 --> 01:05:56.360
<v Speaker 5>And what they're actually finding now and the boomers and

1383
01:05:56.400 --> 01:05:59.519
<v Speaker 5>the dinosaurs in the cardinal it are finding to their chagrin,

1384
01:06:00.159 --> 01:06:02.039
<v Speaker 5>is that they're they're really mad about it. France has

1385
01:06:02.079 --> 01:06:04.719
<v Speaker 5>hated it. He said, these people have psychological problems. They

1386
01:06:04.800 --> 01:06:06.760
<v Speaker 5>like to go to the Latin mass, they like to

1387
01:06:06.800 --> 01:06:08.840
<v Speaker 5>go back to the mass of the ages too.

1388
01:06:08.920 --> 01:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>That's this is what I see in the trends as well,

1389
01:06:11.159 --> 01:06:13.840
<v Speaker 2>that we're finding that gen Z, younger gen Z, not

1390
01:06:13.880 --> 01:06:16.320
<v Speaker 2>older gen Z, are finding faith in Jesus Christ.

1391
01:06:16.840 --> 01:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>That that's that That polling was not a nomination all.

1392
01:06:19.079 --> 01:06:21.559
<v Speaker 2>It was just they were saying it the men are

1393
01:06:21.599 --> 01:06:25.320
<v Speaker 2>leaning more conservative, and then, uh, you know, I suppose

1394
01:06:25.320 --> 01:06:27.199
<v Speaker 2>it's a it's a it's a factor, and that Catholicism

1395
01:06:27.320 --> 01:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>is so big and when the pope, you know, when

1396
01:06:29.960 --> 01:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the pope passed away and they were choosing the new pope,

1397
01:06:31.880 --> 01:06:33.480
<v Speaker 2>it's the biggest story in the world, so I can

1398
01:06:33.559 --> 01:06:36.599
<v Speaker 2>understand it. It just feels like they're lying to people

1399
01:06:36.639 --> 01:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>to try and build up membership numbers.

1400
01:06:38.400 --> 01:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what it feels like.

1401
01:06:40.920 --> 01:06:42.679
<v Speaker 4>When to get into the lies of the Roman Catholic Church,

1402
01:06:46.039 --> 01:06:47.440
<v Speaker 4>this is not this is not some time that his

1403
01:06:47.559 --> 01:06:51.320
<v Speaker 4>church told the world that Constantine gave them the entire

1404
01:06:51.400 --> 01:06:52.199
<v Speaker 4>Western Empire.

1405
01:06:52.239 --> 01:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>To be clarify, I'm not saying this of Catholics.

1406
01:06:55.239 --> 01:06:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying that that the current leadership seemed to be

1407
01:06:58.320 --> 01:07:01.480
<v Speaker 2>their political strategy of we need more converts, so let's

1408
01:07:01.480 --> 01:07:02.480
<v Speaker 2>say what we have to say.

1409
01:07:02.360 --> 01:07:04.599
<v Speaker 4>Again, and my church is doing the opposite thing. We

1410
01:07:04.679 --> 01:07:07.000
<v Speaker 4>separated from the larger church because we felt that they

1411
01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:07.519
<v Speaker 4>were doing that.

1412
01:07:09.280 --> 01:07:12.800
<v Speaker 6>Again, separating makes you not a part of that thing.

1413
01:07:12.960 --> 01:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Sure was.

1414
01:07:14.440 --> 01:07:18.480
<v Speaker 6>So the the point that I raised earlier about the papers.

1415
01:07:19.519 --> 01:07:21.639
<v Speaker 3>Let's let's move on, Papa, we didn't separate.

1416
01:07:21.840 --> 01:07:23.159
<v Speaker 6>We believe they left us.

1417
01:07:23.519 --> 01:07:24.920
<v Speaker 4>And we believe they left us.

1418
01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:27.079
<v Speaker 3>That's why I did an internal critique WHI you don't understand,

1419
01:07:27.159 --> 01:07:27.719
<v Speaker 3>But no.

1420
01:07:27.719 --> 01:07:31.320
<v Speaker 4>You didn't make your was veiled in esotery. We don't

1421
01:07:31.239 --> 01:07:32.920
<v Speaker 4>say communicate, I.

1422
01:07:32.920 --> 01:07:36.320
<v Speaker 6>Guess language the basically make your point on.

1423
01:07:36.559 --> 01:07:39.719
<v Speaker 3>So the the issue with when I'm sonctum all the

1424
01:07:39.760 --> 01:07:42.199
<v Speaker 3>way up to the Syllabus of Errors in the eighteen hundreds,

1425
01:07:42.199 --> 01:07:44.360
<v Speaker 3>where you had to believe in the temporal power and

1426
01:07:44.400 --> 01:07:47.440
<v Speaker 3>supremacy the Roman bishop to be saved. It was mandated

1427
01:07:47.519 --> 01:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>all that time for those centuries to be necessary to

1428
01:07:50.519 --> 01:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>be saved, which the Vatican no longer believes for salvafic purposes.

1429
01:07:55.400 --> 01:07:57.960
<v Speaker 3>They might theoretically still believe it, who knows, but I

1430
01:07:57.960 --> 01:08:03.079
<v Speaker 3>think Vatican too contradicts that with the de Christianizing principles.

1431
01:08:03.119 --> 01:08:05.639
<v Speaker 3>But the point is that ever since the Papal states,

1432
01:08:05.679 --> 01:08:08.920
<v Speaker 3>ever since the eleventh century, especially with the Gregorian reforms,

1433
01:08:08.960 --> 01:08:12.199
<v Speaker 3>the papacy has united itself with and tied itself into

1434
01:08:12.360 --> 01:08:15.519
<v Speaker 3>politics at a.

1435
01:08:14.360 --> 01:08:15.320
<v Speaker 6>At an intense level.

1436
01:08:15.440 --> 01:08:17.520
<v Speaker 3>And that's not all totally the fault of Rome or

1437
01:08:17.880 --> 01:08:20.800
<v Speaker 3>just power seeking. You had the collapse of the Roman Empire,

1438
01:08:20.840 --> 01:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>which led to the vacuum that allowed.

1439
01:08:22.720 --> 01:08:23.800
<v Speaker 6>The papacy to step in.

1440
01:08:24.239 --> 01:08:26.800
<v Speaker 3>But by the time that we get to Dictatus Pope,

1441
01:08:26.960 --> 01:08:28.880
<v Speaker 3>just a couple of things that we have in this document.

1442
01:08:29.319 --> 01:08:32.840
<v Speaker 3>The pope alone can use the imperial signa insignia. All

1443
01:08:32.880 --> 01:08:34.880
<v Speaker 3>princes in the world must kiss the Pope's feet. This

1444
01:08:34.960 --> 01:08:36.760
<v Speaker 3>is the only name in the world. He alone may

1445
01:08:36.840 --> 01:08:40.640
<v Speaker 3>depose all emperors. He alone may confirm all bishops. The

1446
01:08:40.720 --> 01:08:43.039
<v Speaker 3>Roman Sea has never aired and will never air unto

1447
01:08:43.159 --> 01:08:45.159
<v Speaker 3>the end of time. The Roman Church is founded by

1448
01:08:45.159 --> 01:08:48.359
<v Speaker 3>God alone. The Roman Church alone can call itself universal.

1449
01:08:48.439 --> 01:08:51.640
<v Speaker 3>It can alone depose the renstate bishops. Now already we've

1450
01:08:51.640 --> 01:08:54.720
<v Speaker 3>seen that from Dictatus popping the eleventh century. That's a

1451
01:08:54.760 --> 01:08:58.039
<v Speaker 3>contradiction with the way the councils acted and operated in

1452
01:08:58.079 --> 01:09:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the first several centuries. So the Roman bishop becomes a

1453
01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:05.399
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical world power, particularly in the eleventh century, comes to

1454
01:09:05.439 --> 01:09:09.159
<v Speaker 3>its nader you could say, a few centuries later, and

1455
01:09:09.239 --> 01:09:13.039
<v Speaker 3>it is still intimately tied up with geopolitics, because the

1456
01:09:13.039 --> 01:09:17.000
<v Speaker 3>CIA had a huge alliance with the Vatican during the

1457
01:09:17.039 --> 01:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Cold War, and at Vatican two on record and many

1458
01:09:19.640 --> 01:09:20.560
<v Speaker 3>many Catholic right.

1459
01:09:20.560 --> 01:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>What explained Vatican two.

1460
01:09:23.239 --> 01:09:25.119
<v Speaker 3>So this is the council in the nineteen sixties that

1461
01:09:25.239 --> 01:09:28.479
<v Speaker 3>was called by John the twenty third, originally to update

1462
01:09:28.640 --> 01:09:31.680
<v Speaker 3>to make the Roman See and the Roman Church more

1463
01:09:31.720 --> 01:09:35.279
<v Speaker 3>amenable to the world. Ajornamento was his terminology, to open

1464
01:09:35.319 --> 01:09:38.039
<v Speaker 3>the doors and let the world into the Church.

1465
01:09:39.079 --> 01:09:41.159
<v Speaker 1>You would you agree with that assessmentor no?

1466
01:09:41.159 --> 01:09:43.319
<v Speaker 5>No, So Vatican two was I mean, it's true that

1467
01:09:43.359 --> 01:09:45.600
<v Speaker 5>it was all. It's true that it was called by

1468
01:09:45.680 --> 01:09:47.600
<v Speaker 5>John the twenty third. But what happened at the end

1469
01:09:47.640 --> 01:09:51.880
<v Speaker 5>of Vatican One in the eighteen seventies is the frank

1470
01:09:51.920 --> 01:09:56.880
<v Speaker 5>Opression War interrupted it. Vatican one is famous. If we

1471
01:09:56.920 --> 01:09:58.560
<v Speaker 5>look at both of the last two councils of the

1472
01:09:58.640 --> 01:10:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Roman Catholic Church, Vatican one of two, they're both vastly misunderstood.

1473
01:10:02.159 --> 01:10:04.800
<v Speaker 5>The reason Vatican one is vastly misunderstood is because the

1474
01:10:04.800 --> 01:10:09.520
<v Speaker 5>Franco Prussian War interrupted it. Literally in between the two

1475
01:10:09.600 --> 01:10:12.560
<v Speaker 5>goals of Vatican one laying out the power of the Pope,

1476
01:10:12.640 --> 01:10:14.680
<v Speaker 5>clarifying the power of the pope as it had always

1477
01:10:14.720 --> 01:10:18.039
<v Speaker 5>been for two thousand years, eighteen hundred years, and laying

1478
01:10:18.039 --> 01:10:20.119
<v Speaker 5>out the power of the bishops because it is a

1479
01:10:20.760 --> 01:10:23.840
<v Speaker 5>collegial relationship that the Pope has to them, even though

1480
01:10:23.840 --> 01:10:27.720
<v Speaker 5>he is the prince of the apostles. It got interrupted

1481
01:10:27.760 --> 01:10:31.439
<v Speaker 5>and separated by the Franco Prussian War, so Vatican two,

1482
01:10:32.159 --> 01:10:35.439
<v Speaker 5>so it ended up looking by the way like just

1483
01:10:35.520 --> 01:10:37.800
<v Speaker 5>the pope's powers were laid out. The powers of the

1484
01:10:37.840 --> 01:10:41.600
<v Speaker 5>bishops were never at umbrated because of the sudden conclusion

1485
01:10:41.640 --> 01:10:44.840
<v Speaker 5>of that. It was never actually concluded until John the

1486
01:10:44.840 --> 01:10:49.000
<v Speaker 5>twenty third concluded it almost one hundred years later, eighty

1487
01:10:49.039 --> 01:10:52.119
<v Speaker 5>five years later, right before he said, okay, we need

1488
01:10:52.119 --> 01:10:54.319
<v Speaker 5>to have a Vatican two. Yet to what the power

1489
01:10:54.319 --> 01:10:57.319
<v Speaker 5>of the bishops are was Vatican one? Vatican one laid

1490
01:10:57.319 --> 01:10:59.239
<v Speaker 5>out definitively what the power.

1491
01:10:59.039 --> 01:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Of it was like a meeting.

1492
01:11:00.159 --> 01:11:03.399
<v Speaker 4>Was all of these ecumenical count council, which means that

1493
01:11:03.439 --> 01:11:05.560
<v Speaker 4>it was a full council of the Church called dinamper

1494
01:11:06.760 --> 01:11:09.399
<v Speaker 4>not in amor no, no, it was.

1495
01:11:09.439 --> 01:11:11.640
<v Speaker 5>The first seven were called by emperors, some more were

1496
01:11:11.640 --> 01:11:15.159
<v Speaker 5>called by Emper's Council of Florence. Was but an ecumenical

1497
01:11:15.319 --> 01:11:17.720
<v Speaker 5>just means that Ecumenical Council just.

1498
01:11:17.640 --> 01:11:20.159
<v Speaker 4>Means that it's all the world, all the bishops of

1499
01:11:20.199 --> 01:11:20.840
<v Speaker 4>the world.

1500
01:11:20.880 --> 01:11:25.159
<v Speaker 5>Vatican one concludes, suddenly getting just to what the power

1501
01:11:25.199 --> 01:11:27.079
<v Speaker 5>of the pope is, which made it gave it a

1502
01:11:27.119 --> 01:11:31.399
<v Speaker 5>lopsided look our ecclesiology. Afterwards, Vatican Two needed to be

1503
01:11:31.479 --> 01:11:33.680
<v Speaker 5>held to get to what the power of the bishops

1504
01:11:33.680 --> 01:11:38.079
<v Speaker 5>were once we started getting more liberal popes like John

1505
01:11:38.119 --> 01:11:40.159
<v Speaker 5>the twenty third and Paul the sixth, who are the

1506
01:11:40.159 --> 01:11:42.800
<v Speaker 5>two popes alive during Vatican Two in the nineteen sixties,

1507
01:11:43.600 --> 01:11:46.920
<v Speaker 5>they changed the agenda. Actually it was Carl Ronner and

1508
01:11:47.199 --> 01:11:50.359
<v Speaker 5>Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, who a lot of people think was

1509
01:11:50.399 --> 01:11:51.479
<v Speaker 5>a right winger in the church.

1510
01:11:51.479 --> 01:11:55.079
<v Speaker 4>He was not. He and Ronner together changed the agenda

1511
01:11:55.520 --> 01:11:58.479
<v Speaker 4>from finishing what Vatican one was supposed to do lay

1512
01:11:58.520 --> 01:12:02.319
<v Speaker 4>out the power of the bishops, to what he called

1513
01:12:02.520 --> 01:12:07.560
<v Speaker 4>a jornamento updating the Church doing doing essentially liberal things. Now,

1514
01:12:07.880 --> 01:12:11.359
<v Speaker 4>the documents themselves are are not are not bad. The

1515
01:12:11.439 --> 01:12:16.039
<v Speaker 4>documents themselves are insinuitive. Yeah, I read some of the documentary. Yeah,

1516
01:12:16.079 --> 01:12:16.640
<v Speaker 4>once I get done.

1517
01:12:16.720 --> 01:12:22.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the documents themselves are insinuitive of a more liberal position,

1518
01:12:22.560 --> 01:12:25.279
<v Speaker 5>and they were intentionally written in such a way that

1519
01:12:25.319 --> 01:12:27.680
<v Speaker 5>they would be that they could be weaponized.

1520
01:12:27.760 --> 01:12:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Later.

1521
01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:33.039
<v Speaker 5>Lots of the Council fathers that were Rhnoites admitted this,

1522
01:12:34.079 --> 01:12:37.239
<v Speaker 5>things like, you know, what's our relationship to be with

1523
01:12:37.319 --> 01:12:40.600
<v Speaker 5>the Muslims? Jay Jay made reference to this earlier, what's

1524
01:12:40.600 --> 01:12:42.319
<v Speaker 5>our relationship to be with the Hindus?

1525
01:12:42.680 --> 01:12:43.960
<v Speaker 4>And it sounded more liberal.

1526
01:12:44.279 --> 01:12:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Really, what they were doing was quoting things from Pope

1527
01:12:46.640 --> 01:12:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Pious the tenth, a very based older pope. They're quoting

1528
01:12:49.720 --> 01:12:54.039
<v Speaker 5>even from medieval popes who acknowledged things like, technically speaking,

1529
01:12:55.119 --> 01:12:59.239
<v Speaker 5>the Muslims are monotheists. Technically they're one of the Western religions.

1530
01:12:59.239 --> 01:13:02.319
<v Speaker 5>Technically they they worship the one True God, but they

1531
01:13:02.319 --> 01:13:04.159
<v Speaker 5>worship the one True God in the false way.

1532
01:13:04.800 --> 01:13:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Trads, you know, rad Trad's orthodox.

1533
01:13:07.800 --> 01:13:09.800
<v Speaker 5>Everyone gets worked up about this, but it turns out

1534
01:13:09.840 --> 01:13:12.199
<v Speaker 5>that this is a very very old medieval term that

1535
01:13:12.239 --> 01:13:12.880
<v Speaker 5>the Church has.

1536
01:13:13.039 --> 01:13:15.439
<v Speaker 3>The same for Hinduism, because the Vatican too says the

1537
01:13:15.479 --> 01:13:19.760
<v Speaker 3>same as they they believe. They believe not about Hindus, Hindus,

1538
01:13:19.800 --> 01:13:20.840
<v Speaker 3>not moss Hindus.

1539
01:13:21.159 --> 01:13:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, read what it says about Hinduss.

1540
01:13:23.199 --> 01:13:26.880
<v Speaker 3>In Hinduism, people explore the divine mystery and explore and

1541
01:13:26.960 --> 01:13:27.680
<v Speaker 3>express it.

1542
01:13:28.079 --> 01:13:30.640
<v Speaker 6>How do you explore the true mystery of God?

1543
01:13:31.319 --> 01:13:35.159
<v Speaker 3>You can explore what you're looking for, explore Christianity.

1544
01:13:35.199 --> 01:13:37.079
<v Speaker 4>It's absolutely don't explore.

1545
01:13:36.840 --> 01:13:38.039
<v Speaker 6>Christianity and Hinduism.

1546
01:13:38.079 --> 01:13:40.720
<v Speaker 3>They seek release from the trials of present life through

1547
01:13:40.760 --> 01:13:45.079
<v Speaker 3>ascetic practices and meditation and recourse to God in confidence.

1548
01:13:45.119 --> 01:13:47.680
<v Speaker 5>I agree, all that's bad, but you miss so it's

1549
01:13:47.720 --> 01:13:51.079
<v Speaker 5>bad my uncle Remus. Wait wait, my uncle Remus believes

1550
01:13:51.439 --> 01:13:52.800
<v Speaker 5>dogs like your uncle can fly.

1551
01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:55.079
<v Speaker 3>No, this is your dogmatic statements that are supposed to

1552
01:13:55.279 --> 01:13:58.840
<v Speaker 3>provide clarity. Right, they need to be interpreted by you

1553
01:13:58.840 --> 01:13:59.680
<v Speaker 3>because are ambiguous.

1554
01:13:59.680 --> 01:14:02.680
<v Speaker 4>No, No, are they clear or ambiguous? Perfectly clear? They're Hindu?

1555
01:14:02.760 --> 01:14:05.520
<v Speaker 6>Will you just said it was bad? It was bad? Wait?

1556
01:14:06.279 --> 01:14:07.239
<v Speaker 6>Was it clear or bad?

1557
01:14:07.319 --> 01:14:07.800
<v Speaker 4>You finished?

1558
01:14:07.840 --> 01:14:08.119
<v Speaker 6>Jail?

1559
01:14:08.159 --> 01:14:09.159
<v Speaker 4>I'll go after you're done.

1560
01:14:09.439 --> 01:14:10.800
<v Speaker 6>They have recourse to God.

1561
01:14:10.960 --> 01:14:13.520
<v Speaker 3>God will do the same thing. So just again that

1562
01:14:13.600 --> 01:14:16.800
<v Speaker 3>we have said of colection irrelevant. What that's a direct object,

1563
01:14:16.800 --> 01:14:19.880
<v Speaker 3>that's a genetic facis object genetic fallacy to say that

1564
01:14:19.920 --> 01:14:23.560
<v Speaker 3>because it is you just said, I don't know, so

1565
01:14:24.600 --> 01:14:28.520
<v Speaker 3>appealed authority, appealed authority and genetic fallacy. Other fallacy. They

1566
01:14:28.600 --> 01:14:32.880
<v Speaker 3>believe you're King of fallacy record say they believe you're lying?

1567
01:14:32.920 --> 01:14:34.800
<v Speaker 3>You added that explode? Where does it say they do that?

1568
01:14:34.960 --> 01:14:35.159
<v Speaker 4>Read?

1569
01:14:35.560 --> 01:14:38.960
<v Speaker 3>It says that they seek release, and they have recourse

1570
01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:41.880
<v Speaker 3>to God in confidence and the seek they have recourse, No,

1571
01:14:42.039 --> 01:14:44.720
<v Speaker 3>and have recourse. They seek and have recourse?

1572
01:14:44.760 --> 01:14:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

1573
01:14:45.439 --> 01:14:48.760
<v Speaker 3>And what he say and recourse and recourse?

1574
01:14:49.279 --> 01:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean?

1575
01:14:49.800 --> 01:14:52.359
<v Speaker 6>Recourse they have? They seek in.

1576
01:14:52.720 --> 01:14:57.279
<v Speaker 4>They cantafidence and love in God. I'll speak once he's done.

1577
01:14:57.359 --> 01:14:59.439
<v Speaker 4>So what in the Amatican two documents.

1578
01:14:59.159 --> 01:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>That I was very hones By the way, it's a

1579
01:15:00.680 --> 01:15:02.079
<v Speaker 3>genetic fallacy.

1580
01:15:02.079 --> 01:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Can I see the book?

1581
01:15:02.880 --> 01:15:03.119
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

1582
01:15:03.279 --> 01:15:08.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, read the sentence here, let me read it again

1583
01:15:08.479 --> 01:15:11.560
<v Speaker 4>for you. In the relations is going to keep it.

1584
01:15:11.600 --> 01:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>In the religion of Hinduism, people explore the divine mystery,

1585
01:15:14.920 --> 01:15:16.359
<v Speaker 3>explore thank you.

1586
01:15:16.479 --> 01:15:17.119
<v Speaker 6>I just said that.

1587
01:15:17.199 --> 01:15:19.119
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't mean they found to repeat each word after

1588
01:15:19.119 --> 01:15:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I say each.

1589
01:15:19.560 --> 01:15:22.319
<v Speaker 4>What have you said? Ascertained? If they said ascertained, we'd

1590
01:15:22.319 --> 01:15:22.960
<v Speaker 4>have a hard time.

1591
01:15:23.079 --> 01:15:24.319
<v Speaker 3>So he doesn't want me to read the whole quote

1592
01:15:24.319 --> 01:15:28.319
<v Speaker 3>because he knows the the difference.

1593
01:15:28.479 --> 01:15:30.560
<v Speaker 4>In Hindu God, it is very real.

1594
01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:33.600
<v Speaker 3>They have recourse to God in confidence and love.

1595
01:15:35.399 --> 01:15:40.640
<v Speaker 5>They start the sentence over, they seek Jay thinks that

1596
01:15:40.680 --> 01:15:45.600
<v Speaker 5>the sentence said that the Hindu's ascertained, heaven ascertained.

1597
01:15:45.600 --> 01:15:49.039
<v Speaker 3>It says that through exploring it. But you said it

1598
01:15:49.079 --> 01:15:50.159
<v Speaker 3>was a bad statement earlier.

1599
01:15:50.520 --> 01:15:52.279
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no, I said, no, no, it's not that's

1600
01:15:52.279 --> 01:15:56.600
<v Speaker 5>from read the document. I'm saying that it's very easy

1601
01:15:56.600 --> 01:16:00.359
<v Speaker 5>to misinterpret if I say, mine, my dear old uncle remus.

1602
01:16:00.159 --> 01:16:03.279
<v Speaker 3>Why why do we need you to interpret the document?

1603
01:16:03.319 --> 01:16:04.960
<v Speaker 3>You're saying, why do we need you to interpret the

1604
01:16:04.960 --> 01:16:09.880
<v Speaker 3>doctas you to interpret the doc the logic professor keeps

1605
01:16:09.920 --> 01:16:10.560
<v Speaker 3>making fallacies.

1606
01:16:11.720 --> 01:16:12.439
<v Speaker 4>Let me read what I thought.

1607
01:16:12.640 --> 01:16:14.079
<v Speaker 6>Why do you need to interpret them?

1608
01:16:14.199 --> 01:16:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Let me read it.

1609
01:16:15.439 --> 01:16:17.439
<v Speaker 2>There's a paragraph before that one I want to read.

1610
01:16:17.520 --> 01:16:19.119
<v Speaker 2>I want to I just want to read the full paragraph.

1611
01:16:19.920 --> 01:16:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Or actually this is part of the full paragraph. It says,

1612
01:16:22.279 --> 01:16:24.439
<v Speaker 2>throughout history to the present day, there is found among

1613
01:16:24.479 --> 01:16:27.359
<v Speaker 2>different peoples a certain awareness of a hidden power which

1614
01:16:27.399 --> 01:16:29.560
<v Speaker 2>lies behind the course of nature and the events of

1615
01:16:29.640 --> 01:16:32.760
<v Speaker 2>human life. At times, there is present even a recognition

1616
01:16:33.199 --> 01:16:35.920
<v Speaker 2>of a supreme being, or still more of a father.

1617
01:16:36.520 --> 01:16:38.880
<v Speaker 2>This awareness and recognition results in a way of life

1618
01:16:38.880 --> 01:16:41.920
<v Speaker 2>that is imbued with a deep religious sense. The religions

1619
01:16:41.920 --> 01:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>which are found in more advanced civilizations endeavor by way

1620
01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:48.800
<v Speaker 2>of well defined concepts and exact language to answer these questions.

1621
01:16:49.239 --> 01:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Thus, in Hinduism, people.

1622
01:16:51.439 --> 01:16:54.079
<v Speaker 2>Explore the divine mystery and express it both in the

1623
01:16:54.079 --> 01:16:58.439
<v Speaker 2>limitless riches of myth and the accurately defined insights of philosophy.

1624
01:16:58.880 --> 01:17:01.279
<v Speaker 2>They seek release from the trials of the present life

1625
01:17:01.279 --> 01:17:05.720
<v Speaker 2>by ascetical practices, profound meditation, and recourse to God in

1626
01:17:05.760 --> 01:17:09.840
<v Speaker 2>confidence and love. Buddhism, in its various forms, testing costs

1627
01:17:09.920 --> 01:17:12.760
<v Speaker 2>to God to the essential inadequacy of this changing world.

1628
01:17:13.079 --> 01:17:15.119
<v Speaker 2>It proposes a way of life by which people can,

1629
01:17:15.199 --> 01:17:18.279
<v Speaker 2>with confidence and trust, attain a state of perfect liberation

1630
01:17:18.800 --> 01:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>and reach supreme elimination, either through their own efforts or

1631
01:17:21.640 --> 01:17:24.720
<v Speaker 2>with divine help. So to other religions which are found

1632
01:17:24.720 --> 01:17:27.680
<v Speaker 2>throughout the world, attempt in different ways to overcome the

1633
01:17:27.760 --> 01:17:31.439
<v Speaker 2>restlessness of people's hearts by outlining a program of life

1634
01:17:31.680 --> 01:17:34.600
<v Speaker 2>covering doctrine, moral precepts, and sacred rights.

1635
01:17:34.720 --> 01:17:36.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, this is our perfect liberation in hindu and.

1636
01:17:37.960 --> 01:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Real quick, I do want to read this little bit.

1637
01:17:39.920 --> 01:17:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to read the one paragphy. There's a

1638
01:17:41.239 --> 01:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit more that I think is interesting.

1639
01:17:42.239 --> 01:17:43.159
<v Speaker 6>You already said it's bad.

1640
01:17:43.239 --> 01:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>It goes on.

1641
01:17:49.279 --> 01:17:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Again another fallacy at hominem fallacies.

1642
01:17:53.560 --> 01:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>It actually says here we have im mute, but immediately.

1643
01:17:55.680 --> 01:17:58.199
<v Speaker 3>Follow because he's calling out, I'm calling out the logic professor.

1644
01:17:58.680 --> 01:18:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I just want to point out that by and okay, sorry, sorry,

1645
01:18:02.000 --> 01:18:04.920
<v Speaker 2>but immediately following this parer, what says the Catholic Church

1646
01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:08.079
<v Speaker 2>rejects nothing of what is true and wholly.

1647
01:18:07.840 --> 01:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>In these religions.

1648
01:18:09.159 --> 01:18:11.119
<v Speaker 2>It is a high regard for the manner of life

1649
01:18:11.159 --> 01:18:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and conduct conduct, the precepts and doctrines, which, although differing

1650
01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:17.760
<v Speaker 2>in many ways from its own teaching, nevertheless often reflect

1651
01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:20.920
<v Speaker 2>array of that truth which enlightens all men and women.

1652
01:18:21.359 --> 01:18:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Yet it proclaims it is in duty bound to proclaim

1653
01:18:24.239 --> 01:18:26.640
<v Speaker 2>without fail Christ, who is the way the truth in

1654
01:18:26.720 --> 01:18:30.039
<v Speaker 2>life in Him, in whom God reconciled all things to himself.

1655
01:18:30.399 --> 01:18:32.399
<v Speaker 2>People find the fullness of their religious life.

1656
01:18:32.439 --> 01:18:34.600
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

1657
01:18:35.319 --> 01:18:37.560
<v Speaker 3>That shows contradiction. No, that doesn't help you.

1658
01:18:38.520 --> 01:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I actually agree with with the Catholic view.

1659
01:18:40.600 --> 01:18:43.960
<v Speaker 2>It's basically saying the way I interpret that, it's saying

1660
01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Hindus and Buddhists are looking through a keyhole and seeing

1661
01:18:46.319 --> 01:18:49.760
<v Speaker 2>these fragments that they're not quite understanding properly and if

1662
01:18:49.760 --> 01:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>they were to adhere to Jesus Christ and find the way.

1663
01:18:52.039 --> 01:18:57.159
<v Speaker 3>The problem, the even liberals at the Council, problem is

1664
01:18:57.199 --> 01:19:00.359
<v Speaker 3>that only written by John fourteen, Jesus says that He's

1665
01:19:00.399 --> 01:19:03.279
<v Speaker 3>the only way right, the truth in the life. But

1666
01:19:03.560 --> 01:19:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I understand that the problem is that you cannot. It

1667
01:19:05.640 --> 01:19:09.479
<v Speaker 3>says in the religions of Hinduism and Buddhism, men find

1668
01:19:09.720 --> 01:19:12.079
<v Speaker 3>love in God and they find they seek lo the

1669
01:19:12.319 --> 01:19:14.760
<v Speaker 3>know it says they find it. They believe they fine

1670
01:19:14.840 --> 01:19:17.520
<v Speaker 3>phrase says seek it. Then it says they find it.

1671
01:19:17.439 --> 01:19:17.880
<v Speaker 6>Just like I said.

1672
01:19:17.920 --> 01:19:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Read it again, just like it says Muslims adore the

1673
01:19:19.920 --> 01:19:24.920
<v Speaker 3>one God. Well, well, Muslims are different because the religion, No,

1674
01:19:24.960 --> 01:19:25.239
<v Speaker 3>they're not.

1675
01:19:25.560 --> 01:19:27.239
<v Speaker 6>Do they believe religion? You believe?

1676
01:19:27.279 --> 01:19:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Do they believe in one God or multiple? They believe

1677
01:19:29.439 --> 01:19:33.800
<v Speaker 3>in monos the Bible teach. Does the Bible teach the

1678
01:19:33.840 --> 01:19:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Trinity or Monotheism the Trinity? But so the Muslims don't

1679
01:19:37.800 --> 01:19:38.600
<v Speaker 3>believe in the God of the Bible.

1680
01:19:38.680 --> 01:19:39.000
<v Speaker 6>You know that?

1681
01:19:39.079 --> 01:19:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you know what the sense reference dichotomy?

1682
01:19:41.920 --> 01:19:42.079
<v Speaker 3>That?

1683
01:19:42.119 --> 01:19:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I have a question.

1684
01:19:43.439 --> 01:19:46.239
<v Speaker 5>So if you understand what sense referenced dichotomy, okay, we

1685
01:19:46.279 --> 01:19:47.920
<v Speaker 5>can be referring to the thing.

1686
01:19:47.960 --> 01:19:49.479
<v Speaker 4>Does Jesus describe it as yellow?

1687
01:19:50.720 --> 01:19:53.239
<v Speaker 5>And we're still reserting to say that the Pharisees misunderstanding

1688
01:19:53.279 --> 01:19:54.079
<v Speaker 5>this reference.

1689
01:19:54.479 --> 01:19:58.439
<v Speaker 3>Does Jesus think that the Pharisees accurately worship the Father?

1690
01:19:59.239 --> 01:19:59.920
<v Speaker 4>No, of course not.

1691
01:20:00.520 --> 01:20:04.239
<v Speaker 5>Then then that undoes your argument, un does your Muslim

1692
01:20:04.319 --> 01:20:07.159
<v Speaker 5>lane Because you said you understand the sense reference dichotomy.

1693
01:20:07.359 --> 01:20:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Explain how by sense ans risk affirmative and by reference

1694
01:20:11.720 --> 01:20:13.960
<v Speaker 5>it would be a negative answer. We can be referring

1695
01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:16.600
<v Speaker 5>to the same thing. If you think Cleveland doesn't and

1696
01:20:16.640 --> 01:20:16.960
<v Speaker 5>I think.

1697
01:20:16.920 --> 01:20:18.960
<v Speaker 3>They disprove your sense reference argument, and we're not that

1698
01:20:19.039 --> 01:20:20.800
<v Speaker 3>you want to just prove your sense the question, I

1699
01:20:20.800 --> 01:20:25.159
<v Speaker 3>can disprove it by Muslims sense reference. Do Mormons believe

1700
01:20:25.199 --> 01:20:29.159
<v Speaker 3>in Jesus? No, but Mormons don't believe. Do they use

1701
01:20:29.199 --> 01:20:30.079
<v Speaker 3>the term Jesus?

1702
01:20:30.159 --> 01:20:34.880
<v Speaker 4>No, yes, they're not use the terms absolutely, Mormons use

1703
01:20:34.920 --> 01:20:37.880
<v Speaker 4>the term Wait, wait, wait, norm.

1704
01:20:39.199 --> 01:20:42.159
<v Speaker 5>Mormons believe Jesus is I'm the one guy that hasn't

1705
01:20:42.199 --> 01:20:45.960
<v Speaker 5>been interrupting. So Mormons believes that there is a historical Jesus.

1706
01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:49.159
<v Speaker 5>He believes that he that that Mormons Jesus is not

1707
01:20:49.239 --> 01:20:49.960
<v Speaker 5>the son of gods.

1708
01:20:50.159 --> 01:20:52.039
<v Speaker 6>I know what they believe religion.

1709
01:20:52.199 --> 01:20:54.560
<v Speaker 3>So just like Muslims, if they say I believe in

1710
01:20:54.560 --> 01:20:56.840
<v Speaker 3>the One God, it's the quantifier shift fallacy.

1711
01:20:57.279 --> 01:20:59.600
<v Speaker 5>No, that's just the quantity that's true. But that's what

1712
01:20:59.680 --> 01:21:02.760
<v Speaker 5>the document is. The quantifier shift fallacy. Then that undoes

1713
01:21:02.760 --> 01:21:03.479
<v Speaker 5>what what does that mean?

1714
01:21:03.520 --> 01:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean?

1715
01:21:04.039 --> 01:21:06.039
<v Speaker 3>So it's like if I say I have one mother,

1716
01:21:06.159 --> 01:21:08.640
<v Speaker 3>you have one mother. We all have one mother, therefore

1717
01:21:08.680 --> 01:21:11.359
<v Speaker 3>we come from the same mother. It's a quantifying shift fallacy.

1718
01:21:11.640 --> 01:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>So one God, what we all believe in, one God,

1719
01:21:14.560 --> 01:21:17.199
<v Speaker 3>Therefore it's the same God. Vatican two is using the

1720
01:21:17.279 --> 01:21:18.279
<v Speaker 3>quantifier shift fallacy.

1721
01:21:19.520 --> 01:21:20.119
<v Speaker 4>Read the line.

1722
01:21:20.359 --> 01:21:23.359
<v Speaker 5>Read the line that you think is false definitively, because

1723
01:21:23.359 --> 01:21:25.560
<v Speaker 5>there are no definitive statements you've read that are false.

1724
01:21:25.680 --> 01:21:32.119
<v Speaker 4>Notice that seeking, searching, exploring need. It was just retarded.

1725
01:21:32.560 --> 01:21:32.920
<v Speaker 6>Just retard.

1726
01:21:33.039 --> 01:21:34.800
<v Speaker 3>The quarts shift fallacy is retarded, I think.

1727
01:21:34.840 --> 01:21:38.439
<v Speaker 4>Okay, guys, guys, no claim that there's something false you

1728
01:21:38.560 --> 01:21:39.520
<v Speaker 4>just read. It is retarded.

1729
01:21:39.880 --> 01:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me, let me.

1730
01:21:40.640 --> 01:21:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's written by liberals. I gave you that it's written

1731
01:21:43.680 --> 01:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>by liberals. But it's supposed to clarify. So the paper

1732
01:21:46.760 --> 01:21:49.199
<v Speaker 3>does the job of clarifying. But it's written by liberals,

1733
01:21:49.199 --> 01:21:51.000
<v Speaker 3>and we need him to interpret it for you don't

1734
01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:54.199
<v Speaker 3>need me to interpret anything. I'm defending against an attack

1735
01:21:54.279 --> 01:21:57.439
<v Speaker 3>that you're making. That's that's common miscar.

1736
01:21:57.399 --> 01:21:59.680
<v Speaker 6>One true God, living and subsisting in himself.

1737
01:22:01.079 --> 01:22:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yea fallas with two bargaining dogs.

1738
01:22:07.359 --> 01:22:11.319
<v Speaker 5>Every time Muslims claimed how about this, Muslims claim to

1739
01:22:11.359 --> 01:22:12.000
<v Speaker 5>believe in one.

1740
01:22:12.079 --> 01:22:14.279
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't say it says they adore. It doesn't say

1741
01:22:14.279 --> 01:22:14.640
<v Speaker 6>they claim.

1742
01:22:14.720 --> 01:22:19.680
<v Speaker 5>Muslims the words now they adore the sense reference dichotomy.

1743
01:22:19.800 --> 01:22:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Right, okay, wait, wait, wait, hold on, I want to

1744
01:22:23.399 --> 01:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>read this.

1745
01:22:24.520 --> 01:22:25.239
<v Speaker 1>This is important.

1746
01:22:25.720 --> 01:22:28.119
<v Speaker 2>It's as the Church also has a high regard for

1747
01:22:28.199 --> 01:22:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the Muslims. They worship God, who is one living and

1748
01:22:34.439 --> 01:22:38.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I said, I'm not done, the creator of

1749
01:22:38.359 --> 01:22:40.840
<v Speaker 2>having an earth, who was also spoken to humanity. They

1750
01:22:40.920 --> 01:22:43.359
<v Speaker 2>endeavor to submit themselves without reserve, to the hidden decrees

1751
01:22:43.399 --> 01:22:45.439
<v Speaker 2>of God, just as Abraham submitted himself to God's plans

1752
01:22:45.960 --> 01:22:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and whose faith Muslims eagerly linked to their own, although

1753
01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:53.119
<v Speaker 2>not acknowledging him as God. They venerate Jesus, a prophet,

1754
01:22:53.439 --> 01:22:55.760
<v Speaker 2>his virgin mother. They also honor and even at times

1755
01:22:55.760 --> 01:22:58.119
<v Speaker 2>devoutly invoke. Further, they await the day of judgment and

1756
01:22:58.159 --> 01:23:01.079
<v Speaker 2>the reward of the reward of God following the resurrection

1757
01:23:01.199 --> 01:23:04.199
<v Speaker 2>of the dead. For this reason, they highly esteem and

1758
01:23:04.439 --> 01:23:07.880
<v Speaker 2>upright life and worship God, especially by way of prayer.

1759
01:23:07.760 --> 01:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Alms, deeds, and fasting. It.

1760
01:23:09.880 --> 01:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>It does seem like they're saying, as far as I

1761
01:23:13.000 --> 01:23:15.439
<v Speaker 2>can tell, Muslims are worshiping the same God.

1762
01:23:15.520 --> 01:23:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, yes, this is This is a community college

1763
01:23:18.479 --> 01:23:20.359
<v Speaker 3>primer on intro to religions and.

1764
01:23:20.920 --> 01:23:22.199
<v Speaker 6>How you couldn't get quantified ship.

1765
01:23:22.720 --> 01:23:25.640
<v Speaker 5>It's in your Islam is literally one of the three

1766
01:23:25.720 --> 01:23:27.359
<v Speaker 5>monotheisms in Western religion.

1767
01:23:27.479 --> 01:23:30.119
<v Speaker 4>Is it trying? No, It's not the God of the Bible.

1768
01:23:30.199 --> 01:23:33.520
<v Speaker 5>According to you, I said, the Bible God is the Trinity. No, yes,

1769
01:23:33.560 --> 01:23:35.279
<v Speaker 5>you did. Well, of course you don't think. I think

1770
01:23:35.319 --> 01:23:36.600
<v Speaker 5>the Bible God is the Trinity.

1771
01:23:36.640 --> 01:23:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Then the Muslims don't worship the same God because of

1772
01:23:38.880 --> 01:23:40.079
<v Speaker 3>the quantifier shift fallacy.

1773
01:23:40.079 --> 01:23:42.520
<v Speaker 4>The Muslims don't worship the same God. Doesn't say the

1774
01:23:42.560 --> 01:23:43.800
<v Speaker 4>same God as US books says.

1775
01:23:43.840 --> 01:23:45.279
<v Speaker 3>They do, thank you, thank you.

1776
01:23:46.960 --> 01:23:48.439
<v Speaker 4>They don't worship the same.

1777
01:23:48.239 --> 01:23:50.760
<v Speaker 6>God, Muslim, Are you serious?

1778
01:23:50.880 --> 01:23:53.000
<v Speaker 4>What's going on? Heresion?

1779
01:23:53.039 --> 01:23:55.840
<v Speaker 3>They worship God who is living and subsisting in the

1780
01:23:56.039 --> 01:23:58.319
<v Speaker 3>same marciful Almighty Creator.

1781
01:23:58.399 --> 01:24:02.319
<v Speaker 4>No, you said the same God as USU US. It

1782
01:24:02.359 --> 01:24:03.079
<v Speaker 4>doesn't say us.

1783
01:24:03.319 --> 01:24:05.359
<v Speaker 6>Also, it doesn't say us. Are you serious, dude?

1784
01:24:05.399 --> 01:24:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Muslims worship how many? How many gods do Muslims worship?

1785
01:24:09.560 --> 01:24:12.239
<v Speaker 4>Say jay dire? How many gods do Muslims worship?

1786
01:24:12.279 --> 01:24:12.600
<v Speaker 6>Worship?

1787
01:24:12.800 --> 01:24:13.800
<v Speaker 4>How many do they worship?

1788
01:24:13.920 --> 01:24:16.520
<v Speaker 3>By the way, one or two or three? I don't

1789
01:24:16.560 --> 01:24:19.680
<v Speaker 3>believe in generic monotheism. That's a that's a word that.

1790
01:24:19.640 --> 01:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the distinction.

1791
01:24:21.119 --> 01:24:22.479
<v Speaker 4>I also don't agree.

1792
01:24:22.760 --> 01:24:25.119
<v Speaker 3>I believe it's the quantifiership fallacy.

1793
01:24:25.880 --> 01:24:28.640
<v Speaker 4>One thing you tell me you don't believe that they

1794
01:24:28.680 --> 01:24:29.920
<v Speaker 4>believe they worship one.

1795
01:24:29.800 --> 01:24:32.279
<v Speaker 5>God doesn't matter because the statement is that you said

1796
01:24:32.279 --> 01:24:35.920
<v Speaker 5>you understood the sense right the god worship. They do

1797
01:24:36.039 --> 01:24:38.920
<v Speaker 5>worship one true God, tim But what you're equippling over

1798
01:24:39.079 --> 01:24:41.560
<v Speaker 5>failing is whether or not you're melting the verb and

1799
01:24:41.560 --> 01:24:44.640
<v Speaker 5>the direct object there are in agreement. You don't need

1800
01:24:44.640 --> 01:24:47.039
<v Speaker 5>a grammar lesson literally, you do need a grammar less

1801
01:24:48.359 --> 01:24:49.000
<v Speaker 5>logic professor.

1802
01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:50.439
<v Speaker 6>You couldn't do the quantifiership fellaws.

1803
01:24:50.560 --> 01:24:53.600
<v Speaker 4>This guy doesn't know that Islam claims to worship one.

1804
01:24:53.680 --> 01:24:55.880
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't say they just claim it. It says they do it.

1805
01:24:55.920 --> 01:24:59.439
<v Speaker 4>Says they worship God, not they the Church, the Roman

1806
01:24:59.439 --> 01:25:02.039
<v Speaker 4>Catholic Church, which has always acknowledged this is the Romance,

1807
01:25:02.359 --> 01:25:06.079
<v Speaker 4>but since the tenth since two different medieval popes that

1808
01:25:06.239 --> 01:25:10.199
<v Speaker 4>Muslims want to worship some in some sense the same God,

1809
01:25:10.399 --> 01:25:15.840
<v Speaker 4>different reference. Grammatically, grammatically, this is very straightforward. They worship God,

1810
01:25:16.039 --> 01:25:18.560
<v Speaker 4>not a God. They worship God and even the One

1811
01:25:18.640 --> 01:25:23.000
<v Speaker 4>True God. The Church, they worship God, who is one,

1812
01:25:23.199 --> 01:25:24.199
<v Speaker 4>living and subsistence.

1813
01:25:24.840 --> 01:25:25.079
<v Speaker 5>I'm not.

1814
01:25:26.600 --> 01:25:29.039
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox. I'm just saying what the Church is always taught.

1815
01:25:29.159 --> 01:25:32.520
<v Speaker 4>That is the That is them saying, couldn't worship our God?

1816
01:25:32.600 --> 01:25:36.479
<v Speaker 6>Have you address the argument? Then argument would.

1817
01:25:36.920 --> 01:25:40.439
<v Speaker 4>Said on Islam, Tim you would be right to God arguments.

1818
01:25:40.479 --> 01:25:43.119
<v Speaker 5>What I can read you from the personal piet Advice

1819
01:25:43.199 --> 01:25:53.039
<v Speaker 5>the Ten Catechism that he says the One True God.

1820
01:25:49.720 --> 01:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't represent okay, guys, guys.

1821
01:25:53.159 --> 01:25:55.880
<v Speaker 4>And it doesn't represent okay. Where it doesn't represent.

1822
01:25:56.039 --> 01:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, guys, guys. The conversation is not advancing, and one

1823
01:26:00.720 --> 01:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>questions years it's I think it's actually been pretty pretty

1824
01:26:05.640 --> 01:26:06.039
<v Speaker 1>pretty good.

1825
01:26:06.079 --> 01:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Actually, what what I interpret from that is that they

1826
01:26:09.840 --> 01:26:13.119
<v Speaker 2>were trying to say there is one true God, and

1827
01:26:13.159 --> 01:26:16.560
<v Speaker 2>even in that regard, they're saying other religions are seeing

1828
01:26:16.560 --> 01:26:19.479
<v Speaker 2>it improperly and doing it wrong, like looking like the

1829
01:26:19.760 --> 01:26:21.359
<v Speaker 2>argument is you look through a key hole.

1830
01:26:22.399 --> 01:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what it's saying.

1831
01:26:23.439 --> 01:26:26.479
<v Speaker 2>It's saying that Muslims are looking through a hole and

1832
01:26:26.520 --> 01:26:28.720
<v Speaker 2>they're seeing something tiny and they're not doing it right.

1833
01:26:28.840 --> 01:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Hindus are looking through a different hole.

1834
01:26:30.760 --> 01:26:33.079
<v Speaker 2>So I I think the argument of the of the

1835
01:26:33.319 --> 01:26:35.960
<v Speaker 2>of Vetiicanto is there is only one true God.

1836
01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else is looking at it wrong.

1837
01:26:37.720 --> 01:26:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Written by Jesuits liberal, So now their church created the

1838
01:26:42.880 --> 01:26:45.199
<v Speaker 4>Jesuits bad again, that was on that So from the

1839
01:26:45.279 --> 01:26:50.399
<v Speaker 4>orthodox person, yes, the Jesuits are from the flesh. From

1840
01:26:50.399 --> 01:26:53.600
<v Speaker 4>the complained about them and said they're too liberal. Yes,

1841
01:26:53.760 --> 01:26:57.640
<v Speaker 4>that's that's a well known Catholic. Catholics can Catholics can

1842
01:26:57.680 --> 01:27:00.880
<v Speaker 4>be too liberal and it's prodience Episcopal the Yeah, they

1843
01:27:00.880 --> 01:27:02.800
<v Speaker 4>have an ecclesiology. Stay we also have.

1844
01:27:04.319 --> 01:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I got a question.

1845
01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:11.079
<v Speaker 4>Trendsliberal. It doesn't mean that they're Protestants. Well, you also

1846
01:27:11.119 --> 01:27:12.800
<v Speaker 4>expelled them because they were liberals.

1847
01:27:13.239 --> 01:27:15.319
<v Speaker 2>It's the one thing that an agree on is that

1848
01:27:15.359 --> 01:27:17.439
<v Speaker 2>the Episcopal Church is the inferior church.

1849
01:27:17.520 --> 01:27:18.680
<v Speaker 4>The Episcopal Church sucks.

1850
01:27:19.520 --> 01:27:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you all agree?

1851
01:27:20.279 --> 01:27:21.479
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? Yeah, for sure.

1852
01:27:21.560 --> 01:27:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Sure, so I want to I want to highlight too

1853
01:27:23.800 --> 01:27:25.920
<v Speaker 3>that I think Tim will have to admit this that

1854
01:27:26.079 --> 01:27:28.920
<v Speaker 3>post Vatican Two, we can see the actions of the Papa,

1855
01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:32.119
<v Speaker 3>see how they interpret this document, because they in many

1856
01:27:32.199 --> 01:27:35.760
<v Speaker 3>cases literally will go pray in mosque towards Mecca. The

1857
01:27:36.279 --> 01:27:39.319
<v Speaker 3>sixteenth did it. Also, John Paul the second did it. Uh,

1858
01:27:39.359 --> 01:27:42.840
<v Speaker 3>excuse me? A saint and Francis both did this where

1859
01:27:42.880 --> 01:27:45.960
<v Speaker 3>they went to the moss. They reverently prayed towards Mecca.

1860
01:27:46.279 --> 01:27:49.520
<v Speaker 3>That's an outward expression of the interior disposition in Roman

1861
01:27:49.560 --> 01:27:51.319
<v Speaker 3>Catholic moral theology of their faith.

1862
01:27:51.920 --> 01:27:54.239
<v Speaker 4>The way that they're not dogmatic.

1863
01:27:54.399 --> 01:27:56.039
<v Speaker 6>That's Vatican is not dogmatic.

1864
01:27:56.239 --> 01:27:58.960
<v Speaker 5>No, No, Vatican two is dogmatic. The Pope's going in

1865
01:27:59.079 --> 01:28:03.000
<v Speaker 5>and praise stupid expresses. It expresses their faith.

1866
01:28:03.039 --> 01:28:04.560
<v Speaker 4>That's of Constantinople.

1867
01:28:04.640 --> 01:28:06.159
<v Speaker 3>I think I think he's heretic. I don't have a

1868
01:28:06.159 --> 01:28:08.000
<v Speaker 3>problem saying his heretic. Okay, but you can't say that.

1869
01:28:08.079 --> 01:28:09.359
<v Speaker 3>You can't say the pope's a heretic.

1870
01:28:10.119 --> 01:28:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Uh, Francis Francis was a material heretic. We don't know

1871
01:28:13.079 --> 01:28:14.239
<v Speaker 5>yet if he's a formal.

1872
01:28:14.039 --> 01:28:17.159
<v Speaker 3>No one judges the first sea, do you.

1873
01:28:16.600 --> 01:28:18.840
<v Speaker 4>No one has judged the first Sea. Yet who cares

1874
01:28:18.960 --> 01:28:19.840
<v Speaker 4>you're judging it now?

1875
01:28:19.880 --> 01:28:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals in seven fifty says that lady does not have

1876
01:28:24.680 --> 01:28:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the right to judge the bishops and the sea.

1877
01:28:26.720 --> 01:28:27.319
<v Speaker 4>Not judging him.

1878
01:28:27.359 --> 01:28:28.159
<v Speaker 6>That means you just said.

1879
01:28:29.760 --> 01:28:31.800
<v Speaker 4>A material heretics a formal judging.

1880
01:28:32.039 --> 01:28:32.680
<v Speaker 6>I know what it means.

1881
01:28:32.680 --> 01:28:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Of course you don't have authority, but it also means

1882
01:28:35.159 --> 01:28:36.439
<v Speaker 3>that you don't have It says that you have to

1883
01:28:36.439 --> 01:28:38.479
<v Speaker 3>submit with docility to the to the rulings of the

1884
01:28:38.560 --> 01:28:39.199
<v Speaker 3>ordinary teaching.

1885
01:28:39.840 --> 01:28:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Of course that's not it.

1886
01:28:40.920 --> 01:28:43.800
<v Speaker 3>You don't get to action, then you don't get in

1887
01:28:43.880 --> 01:28:48.159
<v Speaker 3>conformity with the liberal view, with the liberal misinterpretation.

1888
01:28:48.840 --> 01:28:49.760
<v Speaker 4>You can't just talk over it.

1889
01:28:50.680 --> 01:28:54.119
<v Speaker 5>Did the council judgement the intentional liberal misinterpretation of those

1890
01:28:54.119 --> 01:28:58.000
<v Speaker 5>passages you read which I'm interpret Wait wait, tim interpreted

1891
01:28:58.039 --> 01:29:02.239
<v Speaker 5>correctly so he can by popes and and I'll admiss.

1892
01:29:02.319 --> 01:29:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll just say this, Uh, that which I read is

1893
01:29:06.760 --> 01:29:07.680
<v Speaker 2>more convincing to me.

1894
01:29:08.119 --> 01:29:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Of the Catholics.

1895
01:29:09.600 --> 01:29:12.199
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would agree, if not for the fact that

1896
01:29:12.239 --> 01:29:15.000
<v Speaker 4>it says Muslims worship the same God. It doesn't say

1897
01:29:15.079 --> 01:29:22.479
<v Speaker 4>same God. Yes, the word saying literally the one God.

1898
01:29:23.079 --> 01:29:25.840
<v Speaker 4>It does rammatically making up who's the creator?

1899
01:29:25.840 --> 01:29:27.000
<v Speaker 6>To wait, who's the creator?

1900
01:29:27.239 --> 01:29:30.359
<v Speaker 4>Does it say same? The creator says they worship God.

1901
01:29:31.039 --> 01:29:34.640
<v Speaker 4>People out there this passage is the creator.

1902
01:29:34.199 --> 01:29:36.960
<v Speaker 2>The microphone if no one else, if people keep talking, Uh,

1903
01:29:37.079 --> 01:29:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's correct.

1904
01:29:38.239 --> 01:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but I think I think Muslims do worship God.

1905
01:29:40.800 --> 01:29:41.199
<v Speaker 4>They don't.

1906
01:29:41.319 --> 01:29:42.399
<v Speaker 6>They don't, but our God.

1907
01:29:42.520 --> 01:29:45.159
<v Speaker 2>So he already admitted and so that says capital G God.

1908
01:29:45.239 --> 01:29:46.720
<v Speaker 2>That's why this is convincing to me. And you guys

1909
01:29:46.720 --> 01:29:47.439
<v Speaker 2>aren't being convincing.

1910
01:29:47.960 --> 01:29:51.199
<v Speaker 4>Again God, if it said a God, I agree with you,

1911
01:29:51.239 --> 01:29:53.359
<v Speaker 4>but it's because I I think believe there's a God

1912
01:29:53.399 --> 01:29:53.960
<v Speaker 4>besides God.

1913
01:29:53.960 --> 01:29:54.479
<v Speaker 1>I think there is.

1914
01:29:54.640 --> 01:29:57.479
<v Speaker 5>That's the sense reference dichotomy right there. So you believe

1915
01:29:57.520 --> 01:29:59.880
<v Speaker 5>there's another god besides God. So the popes pray in

1916
01:30:00.359 --> 01:30:03.000
<v Speaker 5>You just said you believe they worship You're what I

1917
01:30:03.039 --> 01:30:04.119
<v Speaker 5>said God?

1918
01:30:04.319 --> 01:30:07.279
<v Speaker 4>I said. If if it said they worship a god,

1919
01:30:07.520 --> 01:30:11.199
<v Speaker 4>as is important, they believe they're worshiping a God who

1920
01:30:11.239 --> 01:30:11.760
<v Speaker 4>is similar.

1921
01:30:11.840 --> 01:30:14.359
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no, not, they believe they really do. Remember that's them.

1922
01:30:14.600 --> 01:30:16.000
<v Speaker 5>Wait wait, wait is an argument?

1923
01:30:16.119 --> 01:30:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Now?

1924
01:30:16.359 --> 01:30:16.960
<v Speaker 4>Your text?

1925
01:30:17.119 --> 01:30:17.880
<v Speaker 6>It's your text?

1926
01:30:18.119 --> 01:30:18.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1927
01:30:18.359 --> 01:30:20.119
<v Speaker 5>You literally, I know it's I know it's my text.

1928
01:30:20.119 --> 01:30:22.680
<v Speaker 5>You literally what would make all the difference is if

1929
01:30:22.720 --> 01:30:25.479
<v Speaker 5>they said that the Muslims worship a God rather than

1930
01:30:25.520 --> 01:30:28.720
<v Speaker 5>a God. You're making reference to the sense reference ecotomy

1931
01:30:28.800 --> 01:30:30.159
<v Speaker 5>by saying a no.

1932
01:30:30.359 --> 01:30:31.640
<v Speaker 6>That's why you can answer.

1933
01:30:32.720 --> 01:30:36.640
<v Speaker 4>You're not understanding what I said, or you're not understanding

1934
01:30:36.840 --> 01:30:40.079
<v Speaker 4>I'm not deliberately misrepresenting anything I'm saying, and you don't

1935
01:30:40.119 --> 01:30:40.960
<v Speaker 4>understand what I said.

1936
01:30:41.039 --> 01:30:45.880
<v Speaker 5>This sense reference dichotomy literally covers whether God or.

1937
01:30:46.319 --> 01:30:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Sense referenced dichotomy. This is grammar.

1938
01:30:48.359 --> 01:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what it is? Yes?

1939
01:30:49.680 --> 01:30:53.279
<v Speaker 3>Okay, guys, this is grammar. It's a grammatical tandation. Tim

1940
01:30:53.359 --> 01:30:54.520
<v Speaker 3>understands it's the same God.

1941
01:30:54.760 --> 01:30:59.439
<v Speaker 2>He okay, he is not not say it does worship

1942
01:30:59.520 --> 01:31:00.920
<v Speaker 2>God appital g God.

1943
01:31:00.920 --> 01:31:03.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to quote my friend Jay Dyer who says

1944
01:31:03.720 --> 01:31:06.960
<v Speaker 5>that this passage says same God, not one God.

1945
01:31:06.880 --> 01:31:07.640
<v Speaker 4>Who's the creator?

1946
01:31:07.640 --> 01:31:10.119
<v Speaker 3>Tim, same God would be Tim, who's the creator.

1947
01:31:10.439 --> 01:31:12.239
<v Speaker 4>The same God would be inxical.

1948
01:31:12.479 --> 01:31:14.560
<v Speaker 3>So why are you being dishonesed? You're being dishonest?

1949
01:31:15.600 --> 01:31:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Tim, literally, come on, man, come the thea he can't answer,

1950
01:31:21.039 --> 01:31:23.079
<v Speaker 4>I understand, understand the philosophy and.

1951
01:31:23.239 --> 01:31:26.239
<v Speaker 3>Melting down and coping because he can't answer create at all.

1952
01:31:26.600 --> 01:31:30.640
<v Speaker 4>You made heretic twenty minutes ago, and I agree with Muslims.

1953
01:31:30.119 --> 01:31:33.159
<v Speaker 5>Worship the same God as us would be buying. Indexical

1954
01:31:33.800 --> 01:31:36.880
<v Speaker 5>means that it says if he used the word same.

1955
01:31:36.760 --> 01:31:38.000
<v Speaker 6>It would you want the attributes.

1956
01:31:38.039 --> 01:31:38.840
<v Speaker 4>It would be heresy.

1957
01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:41.399
<v Speaker 5>And that's why I said it wasn't natural theology. But

1958
01:31:41.439 --> 01:31:43.880
<v Speaker 5>it says that they worship one God, then it would

1959
01:31:43.920 --> 01:31:46.199
<v Speaker 5>be correct. It says they do worship one God.

1960
01:31:46.279 --> 01:31:51.159
<v Speaker 3>They worship God who is one, living and subsisting in himself, merciful,

1961
01:31:51.239 --> 01:31:52.760
<v Speaker 3>arm Almarighty and the Creator.

1962
01:31:52.880 --> 01:31:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Sure I'm breaking the Muslim view. I don't know. Again,

1963
01:31:56.840 --> 01:31:59.239
<v Speaker 4>you know what if he said just a God, they'd

1964
01:31:59.239 --> 01:32:00.800
<v Speaker 4>beading the Muslim viea.

1965
01:32:00.840 --> 01:32:04.960
<v Speaker 3>But they say lumin Gentium sixteen says they adore the

1966
01:32:05.000 --> 01:32:08.399
<v Speaker 3>one God. That's a term of worship, the one God.

1967
01:32:08.479 --> 01:32:11.199
<v Speaker 3>They adore the one God, and said this in his

1968
01:32:11.279 --> 01:32:12.520
<v Speaker 3>personal catechism.

1969
01:32:13.640 --> 01:32:14.359
<v Speaker 4>And too medieval.

1970
01:32:15.560 --> 01:32:17.680
<v Speaker 5>You could take issue with the Roman Catholic position. As

1971
01:32:17.720 --> 01:32:19.680
<v Speaker 5>an Orthodox, that's what you should do, but you can't

1972
01:32:19.720 --> 01:32:23.039
<v Speaker 5>say Church has change them. The document that's contradicting is

1973
01:32:23.079 --> 01:32:23.520
<v Speaker 5>the argument.

1974
01:32:23.840 --> 01:32:24.520
<v Speaker 6>We don't care about.

1975
01:32:24.520 --> 01:32:27.920
<v Speaker 5>The document doesn't contradict Catholicism. It might contradict Jay Dyer

1976
01:32:28.199 --> 01:32:29.399
<v Speaker 5>or no the.

1977
01:32:29.520 --> 01:32:31.520
<v Speaker 6>Document itself contradicts what you said earlier.

1978
01:32:31.680 --> 01:32:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Does Catholicism hold that Islam is the same as Christianity?

1979
01:32:36.039 --> 01:32:38.000
<v Speaker 4>Do you know what a precept is? What a logical

1980
01:32:38.039 --> 01:32:38.640
<v Speaker 4>axiom is.

1981
01:32:38.960 --> 01:32:43.239
<v Speaker 5>Logical axioms are pre scriptural, so literally the sense referenced

1982
01:32:43.279 --> 01:32:46.680
<v Speaker 5>dichotomy or the concept of proportional cause.

1983
01:32:46.920 --> 01:32:48.479
<v Speaker 4>These are things which are which.

1984
01:32:48.399 --> 01:32:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Pre so sophiety to explain something you don't understand. No,

1985
01:32:54.720 --> 01:32:57.359
<v Speaker 3>you didn't know that. You didn't understand this. Five fallacies

1986
01:32:57.359 --> 01:32:59.880
<v Speaker 3>in a row. You said the same. That would be

1987
01:33:00.479 --> 01:33:05.000
<v Speaker 3>they text, because that's what the argument of the text is.

1988
01:33:05.840 --> 01:33:08.079
<v Speaker 3>They adore the one God in Lumit genty of sixteen.

1989
01:33:08.159 --> 01:33:11.399
<v Speaker 4>In order argument to be cool, they have to not

1990
01:33:11.439 --> 01:33:12.239
<v Speaker 4>be a proper Now.

1991
01:33:14.800 --> 01:33:16.439
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to We're gonna have to want everybody

1992
01:33:16.520 --> 01:33:17.159
<v Speaker 1>know they don't.

1993
01:33:17.279 --> 01:33:19.359
<v Speaker 2>I believe that is a is a PI that testing

1994
01:33:19.399 --> 01:33:25.199
<v Speaker 2>it is he muting everybody. I don't, okay, I don't

1995
01:33:25.239 --> 01:33:28.039
<v Speaker 2>know what y'all are arguing at this point.

1996
01:33:28.319 --> 01:33:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I just I just hear noise is here yelling.

1997
01:33:31.800 --> 01:33:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Well the moment, the moment anyone talks someone else, everyone

1998
01:33:35.199 --> 01:33:37.720
<v Speaker 2>else's talking. And then when I was asking a question,

1999
01:33:37.840 --> 01:33:39.840
<v Speaker 2>you guys started having a different debate at the same

2000
01:33:39.920 --> 01:33:40.399
<v Speaker 2>that's fair.

2001
01:33:41.239 --> 01:33:45.039
<v Speaker 4>That's a fair point. Can I say what I perceive

2002
01:33:45.119 --> 01:33:46.920
<v Speaker 4>the argument to me is somebody who's kind of outside

2003
01:33:46.960 --> 01:33:47.079
<v Speaker 4>of it.

2004
01:33:47.439 --> 01:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's just let them let him say it.

2005
01:33:48.840 --> 01:33:51.960
<v Speaker 4>And then what I'm hearing from Jay is that that

2006
01:33:52.159 --> 01:33:56.840
<v Speaker 4>passage reads that Muslims, by what the passage says, not literally,

2007
01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:00.239
<v Speaker 4>Muslims worship the same God that we do. Because it

2008
01:34:00.359 --> 01:34:04.600
<v Speaker 4>says they worship God capital G proper noun. And then

2009
01:34:04.640 --> 01:34:08.079
<v Speaker 4>that is followed up with a description of the Christian God.

2010
01:34:08.600 --> 01:34:11.640
<v Speaker 4>You are saying that this is correct because they do

2011
01:34:11.800 --> 01:34:16.720
<v Speaker 4>believe they worship the same God as us. Therefore it's

2012
01:34:16.760 --> 01:34:19.840
<v Speaker 4>not incorrect. I would argue if it said they worship

2013
01:34:19.920 --> 01:34:23.520
<v Speaker 4>a God, you would be correct. Drammatically, it says they

2014
01:34:23.520 --> 01:34:27.079
<v Speaker 4>worship does God exist outside of it? Doesn't matter. They

2015
01:34:27.119 --> 01:34:30.039
<v Speaker 4>are worshiping something you're not talking about. I'm talking about reference.

2016
01:34:30.560 --> 01:34:33.279
<v Speaker 3>There's another quote that answer, So yeah, read that next quote.

2017
01:34:33.359 --> 01:34:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Please don't interrupt, Luminingentians. I have a thought on this.

2018
01:34:36.199 --> 01:34:39.079
<v Speaker 3>So there's another statement beyond Nosratate three, which is lumin

2019
01:34:39.119 --> 01:34:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Gentium sixteen. It says the plan of salvation includes those

2020
01:34:42.800 --> 01:34:46.279
<v Speaker 3>that acknowledge the Creator. First among whom are the Muslims.

2021
01:34:46.600 --> 01:34:50.880
<v Speaker 3>They profess the faith of Abraham, and together with us

2022
01:34:50.880 --> 01:34:52.079
<v Speaker 3>Catholics they adore.

2023
01:34:51.800 --> 01:34:54.279
<v Speaker 6>The One True God that refute.

2024
01:34:53.840 --> 01:34:55.520
<v Speaker 4>You anyway.

2025
01:34:57.119 --> 01:35:00.359
<v Speaker 3>With us topics, together with us for future entire argument,

2026
01:35:00.399 --> 01:35:03.840
<v Speaker 3>the last twenty Together with US Catholics.

2027
01:35:03.880 --> 01:35:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, afterwards, Okay, together with us who are they referring.

2028
01:35:07.760 --> 01:35:11.600
<v Speaker 4>To muslim and Catholics? Okays and Christians Catholics.

2029
01:35:11.920 --> 01:35:14.880
<v Speaker 3>So the Catholic with us, this is this together with.

2030
01:35:17.199 --> 01:35:18.520
<v Speaker 6>US Catholics. What are you talking about?

2031
01:35:18.560 --> 01:35:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I'm I'm gonna tell you.

2032
01:35:20.239 --> 01:35:23.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say this right now, guys, to Orthodox and

2033
01:35:23.680 --> 01:35:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Anglican Catholic. Everything you're saying is convincing me more and

2034
01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:31.359
<v Speaker 2>more of the Catholic argument because the position that this

2035
01:35:31.520 --> 01:35:35.000
<v Speaker 2>is taking. Imagine it like this. There's a rock concert

2036
01:35:35.680 --> 01:35:39.960
<v Speaker 2>an arena, stadium, and Catholics are all let's let's just say,

2037
01:35:40.119 --> 01:35:41.760
<v Speaker 2>from from the from the argument fromend of this book.

2038
01:35:41.800 --> 01:35:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Catholics are all looking directly at the stage, and Muslims

2039
01:35:45.840 --> 01:35:48.880
<v Speaker 2>are in the back behind it, hearing a different, basic,

2040
01:35:49.279 --> 01:35:52.720
<v Speaker 2>garbled version of it. They're cheering for Freddie Mercury, but

2041
01:35:52.800 --> 01:35:56.199
<v Speaker 2>they're hearing some weird version of the song exactly.

2042
01:35:55.840 --> 01:35:57.119
<v Speaker 1>When I hear that is.

2043
01:35:57.199 --> 01:35:59.640
<v Speaker 2>What it's saying is that they're that all of these

2044
01:35:59.680 --> 01:36:03.520
<v Speaker 2>different religions are looking at they're doing things the wrong

2045
01:36:03.600 --> 01:36:06.760
<v Speaker 2>way towards the right God, and it's and it's because

2046
01:36:06.960 --> 01:36:08.039
<v Speaker 2>there is only one God.

2047
01:36:08.600 --> 01:36:11.800
<v Speaker 5>This is precisely the Catholic interpretation since Vatican Two. Now,

2048
01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:14.920
<v Speaker 5>I admit, but very outset that it's written by liberals,

2049
01:36:14.920 --> 01:36:19.680
<v Speaker 5>so it squints towards more conciliation, which is bad. But

2050
01:36:19.800 --> 01:36:23.000
<v Speaker 5>we have to say that lumin gensium. Yeah, but after

2051
01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:26.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm done lumine gensium and the other two sacred constitutions

2052
01:36:26.680 --> 01:36:27.560
<v Speaker 5>as Vatican too.

2053
01:36:28.119 --> 01:36:30.079
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're using.

2054
01:36:31.439 --> 01:36:32.239
<v Speaker 4>I'd be all four.

2055
01:36:32.479 --> 01:36:34.560
<v Speaker 5>I'd be all four by the way, muting while other

2056
01:36:34.600 --> 01:36:37.079
<v Speaker 5>guys are talking, because that that's a really effective way

2057
01:36:37.119 --> 01:36:37.560
<v Speaker 5>of It's.

2058
01:36:37.479 --> 01:36:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Still just yelling, though, you know what I mean.

2059
01:36:39.039 --> 01:36:41.039
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, but I could sit here and be quiet.

2060
01:36:41.079 --> 01:36:42.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying it is the Catholic.

2061
01:36:42.760 --> 01:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, Trump shouldn't have been muted either.

2062
01:36:46.079 --> 01:36:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, agreed, No, as the as the Catholic that there

2063
01:36:50.039 --> 01:36:53.800
<v Speaker 5>has to be a distinction between monotheism and polytheism on

2064
01:36:53.880 --> 01:36:58.039
<v Speaker 5>the basis of natural religion. Everyone knows everyone out there

2065
01:36:58.039 --> 01:37:00.920
<v Speaker 5>who's listening to this knows, okay, there're three Abrahamic religions,

2066
01:37:00.960 --> 01:37:02.840
<v Speaker 5>which was posited by Lumingensium.

2067
01:37:03.119 --> 01:37:05.880
<v Speaker 4>There's Judaism, Islam, Christianity.

2068
01:37:06.000 --> 01:37:09.640
<v Speaker 5>That this is you know, community college intro to religions

2069
01:37:09.680 --> 01:37:12.800
<v Speaker 5>one oh one. There are polytheisms. There are only three

2070
01:37:12.880 --> 01:37:15.359
<v Speaker 5>monotheisms in the history of the world. Now there's only

2071
01:37:15.399 --> 01:37:20.119
<v Speaker 5>one correct monotheism, which is posits a triune God. They

2072
01:37:20.119 --> 01:37:22.920
<v Speaker 5>say that they get this wrong. This is repeated throughout

2073
01:37:22.960 --> 01:37:27.079
<v Speaker 5>the Sacred Constitutions of Vatican Two that Jews and Muslims,

2074
01:37:27.119 --> 01:37:30.600
<v Speaker 5>even though they're monotheists, they get it wrong. They don't

2075
01:37:30.640 --> 01:37:33.119
<v Speaker 5>worship a triun God. This has said countless times in

2076
01:37:33.159 --> 01:37:36.920
<v Speaker 5>the documents. But that's why we don't have the index.

2077
01:37:37.319 --> 01:37:41.680
<v Speaker 5>They believe, or they falsely think that that language is

2078
01:37:41.760 --> 01:37:44.880
<v Speaker 5>reserved in the Vatican two documents for the polytheisms. So

2079
01:37:45.039 --> 01:37:48.119
<v Speaker 5>all they're doing there and it's written by Jesuit liberals,

2080
01:37:48.720 --> 01:37:53.640
<v Speaker 5>we're squinting toward, squinting toward a bad interpretation. They say correctly,

2081
01:37:53.720 --> 01:37:57.079
<v Speaker 5>they worship the One True God. Pis the Tenth says

2082
01:37:57.119 --> 01:37:59.720
<v Speaker 5>this in his personal catechism. He's a tad favorite. Two

2083
01:37:59.720 --> 01:38:03.000
<v Speaker 5>other medieval popes say the exact same thing, whether Jay

2084
01:38:03.079 --> 01:38:06.359
<v Speaker 5>Dyer or lor Lodge likes it, this is the Catholic

2085
01:38:06.439 --> 01:38:07.560
<v Speaker 5>this is the Catholic view.

2086
01:38:07.840 --> 01:38:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, but he's branding enough.

2087
01:38:09.760 --> 01:38:13.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm trying to help you brand. But with regard this

2088
01:38:13.239 --> 01:38:13.800
<v Speaker 4>is the last name.

2089
01:38:13.880 --> 01:38:14.039
<v Speaker 6>Look.

2090
01:38:14.119 --> 01:38:16.920
<v Speaker 5>With regard to the polytheists, that's why they always say

2091
01:38:17.119 --> 01:38:19.920
<v Speaker 5>they falsely claim that they falsely believe, that they falsely

2092
01:38:19.960 --> 01:38:21.199
<v Speaker 5>search for they seek for.

2093
01:38:21.640 --> 01:38:23.399
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So the distinction is monotheist.

2094
01:38:23.840 --> 01:38:26.520
<v Speaker 3>This is correct. And everything Tim said there we would

2095
01:38:26.520 --> 01:38:29.920
<v Speaker 3>agree with, except that from the Orthox perspective we reject

2096
01:38:29.920 --> 01:38:33.399
<v Speaker 3>the whole idea that there are Abrahamic monotheistic faiths. So

2097
01:38:33.520 --> 01:38:36.720
<v Speaker 3>even though Muslims might see themselves as that, when we

2098
01:38:36.760 --> 01:38:39.520
<v Speaker 3>look at the Old Testament revelation, we believe that it

2099
01:38:39.600 --> 01:38:42.760
<v Speaker 3>is the Trinity explicitly revealing itself in the Old Testament.

2100
01:38:42.800 --> 01:38:44.920
<v Speaker 3>They don't know the name per se of the word Trinity,

2101
01:38:45.199 --> 01:38:48.760
<v Speaker 3>but it's Yahweh, his angel, messenger and his Spirit are revealed.

2102
01:38:48.760 --> 01:38:51.079
<v Speaker 3>And in John five through nine, when Jesus debates with

2103
01:38:51.119 --> 01:38:55.359
<v Speaker 3>the Pharisees, who were the monotheists, he consistently says, you

2104
01:38:55.399 --> 01:38:57.760
<v Speaker 3>don't get the right God. You don't get the right picture.

2105
01:38:57.880 --> 01:39:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Abraham worshiped me, Jesus says in on it, he says

2106
01:39:00.800 --> 01:39:04.199
<v Speaker 3>Moses wrote about him, meaning that Abraham and Moses had

2107
01:39:04.239 --> 01:39:07.680
<v Speaker 3>faith in Christ. This is a key point to undo

2108
01:39:07.880 --> 01:39:11.640
<v Speaker 3>the natural theology argument that the Old Testament posited a

2109
01:39:11.680 --> 01:39:15.159
<v Speaker 3>generic theism of just a one monotheistic God. If Abraham

2110
01:39:15.159 --> 01:39:18.159
<v Speaker 3>believe in the Trinity, then the whole Abrahamic religion thing

2111
01:39:18.199 --> 01:39:21.119
<v Speaker 3>falls apart. And Jesus says that to have faith in

2112
01:39:21.199 --> 01:39:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Him makes you a child of Abraham. Galatians three pulse

2113
01:39:24.359 --> 01:39:27.840
<v Speaker 3>is exact same thing. So when Vatican two acknowledges that

2114
01:39:28.279 --> 01:39:31.319
<v Speaker 3>they have the faith of Abraham together with us, we

2115
01:39:31.439 --> 01:39:34.479
<v Speaker 3>believe that as a denial of jesus teaching in John

2116
01:39:34.560 --> 01:39:38.119
<v Speaker 3>eight that you can be a child of Abraham without faith.

2117
01:39:38.159 --> 01:39:39.680
<v Speaker 4>I guess that's the art. That's fair.

2118
01:39:39.760 --> 01:39:40.119
<v Speaker 6>That's fair.

2119
01:39:40.159 --> 01:39:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Grot real quick, just as just my response is kind

2120
01:39:42.960 --> 01:39:46.840
<v Speaker 2>of like, let's say we discover like we can make

2121
01:39:46.880 --> 01:39:52.319
<v Speaker 2>intercontinental ballistic missiles and very powerful ICBMs. The modern American

2122
01:39:52.600 --> 01:39:55.720
<v Speaker 2>ICBM is one two hundred and fifty times stronger than

2123
01:39:55.720 --> 01:39:59.119
<v Speaker 2>the bombs dropped on Hiroshima, Nagasaki. It is also possible

2124
01:39:59.159 --> 01:40:02.520
<v Speaker 2>that there is also true that Indian Pakistan have nuclear

2125
01:40:02.560 --> 01:40:05.680
<v Speaker 2>weapons that are substantially weaker because they have not yet

2126
01:40:05.760 --> 01:40:08.520
<v Speaker 2>discovered the means and the capability by which to build

2127
01:40:08.720 --> 01:40:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a powerful bomb.

2128
01:40:10.199 --> 01:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think it.

2129
01:40:10.840 --> 01:40:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Could be said that you may have discovered hidden truths

2130
01:40:15.760 --> 01:40:18.479
<v Speaker 2>and the true path towards God and religion, and Muslims

2131
01:40:18.479 --> 01:40:21.079
<v Speaker 2>are effectively using a one killtun bomb when you got

2132
01:40:21.119 --> 01:40:21.840
<v Speaker 2>a megadun bomb.

2133
01:40:22.520 --> 01:40:24.439
<v Speaker 4>That's why I think the argument would be that Muslims

2134
01:40:24.479 --> 01:40:25.439
<v Speaker 4>are openly rejecting.

2135
01:40:25.760 --> 01:40:28.520
<v Speaker 3>So the point is that, like, there are fundamentals that

2136
01:40:28.560 --> 01:40:32.520
<v Speaker 3>are absolutely essential to have access to God or to Christianity.

2137
01:40:32.560 --> 01:40:35.079
<v Speaker 3>So to deny, for example, the trendy or the incarnation

2138
01:40:35.760 --> 01:40:38.319
<v Speaker 3>puts us one outside of the bounds of Christianity at all.

2139
01:40:38.439 --> 01:40:42.439
<v Speaker 1>But I agree that, like, look at it this way.

2140
01:40:43.239 --> 01:40:45.119
<v Speaker 2>There's a bouncer at a club and he says, if

2141
01:40:45.119 --> 01:40:46.199
<v Speaker 2>you follow the rules, you can.

2142
01:40:46.079 --> 01:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Come into the club.

2143
01:40:47.119 --> 01:40:48.880
<v Speaker 2>And half the people follow the rules and get let in.

2144
01:40:48.920 --> 01:40:50.880
<v Speaker 2>The other half says that guy's telling us to go

2145
01:40:50.920 --> 01:40:53.239
<v Speaker 2>bash the windows out, and they get thrown out. They

2146
01:40:53.279 --> 01:40:55.279
<v Speaker 2>thought that's what the guy wanted. It's the same guy,

2147
01:40:55.319 --> 01:40:56.039
<v Speaker 2>but they're doing it wrong.

2148
01:40:56.079 --> 01:40:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, getting we throw we do throw people out right.

2149
01:41:00.279 --> 01:41:04.119
<v Speaker 2>My point is when when Vatican two says they worship God,

2150
01:41:04.880 --> 01:41:05.960
<v Speaker 2>it's like the bouncer.

2151
01:41:05.680 --> 01:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Being like, yo, I never told those people to throw

2152
01:41:07.279 --> 01:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>bricks at the building. What are they doing?

2153
01:41:08.640 --> 01:41:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Well?

2154
01:41:08.800 --> 01:41:11.319
<v Speaker 3>The problem is not just worship, but Vatican two uses

2155
01:41:11.319 --> 01:41:13.720
<v Speaker 3>the term of adoration, which in Klac theology is more

2156
01:41:13.760 --> 01:41:16.880
<v Speaker 3>specific than just a generic idea of natural theology. Adoration

2157
01:41:17.039 --> 01:41:20.119
<v Speaker 3>is something that's a specific term for like adoring the

2158
01:41:20.159 --> 01:41:23.239
<v Speaker 3>Eucharist in Calaic theology. And I would also point out

2159
01:41:23.239 --> 01:41:25.359
<v Speaker 3>that when my opening statement I mentioned the fact that

2160
01:41:25.399 --> 01:41:27.800
<v Speaker 3>the Council of v n which is a medieval romancalact theology,

2161
01:41:27.840 --> 01:41:29.479
<v Speaker 3>which was involved in the crusades.

2162
01:41:30.159 --> 01:41:32.840
<v Speaker 6>That attitude today.

2163
01:41:32.520 --> 01:41:35.039
<v Speaker 3>That you see here is completely different than the attitude

2164
01:41:35.079 --> 01:41:37.399
<v Speaker 3>then in the Middle Ages, where it was the abominable

2165
01:41:37.399 --> 01:41:40.920
<v Speaker 3>sect of Muhammet. In the council they call crusades against

2166
01:41:40.920 --> 01:41:42.319
<v Speaker 3>the Muslims to protect the Holy Land.

2167
01:41:42.399 --> 01:41:45.199
<v Speaker 4>Sure attitudes change, dogma, no, no, how can.

2168
01:41:45.079 --> 01:41:46.560
<v Speaker 6>You be the abominable sect of Muhammad?

2169
01:41:46.640 --> 01:41:49.760
<v Speaker 3>But now, but now together with us, they adore the

2170
01:41:49.760 --> 01:41:50.279
<v Speaker 3>once through God.

2171
01:41:50.279 --> 01:41:51.119
<v Speaker 6>That's the contradiction to.

2172
01:41:51.159 --> 01:41:53.159
<v Speaker 4>M They could be the abominable sect of Muhammad and

2173
01:41:53.239 --> 01:41:53.960
<v Speaker 4>still worship point.

2174
01:41:54.039 --> 01:41:59.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh, they don't even though my references with us Tim.

2175
01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Jake, can I are these both these are both dogmatic

2176
01:42:01.960 --> 01:42:04.560
<v Speaker 4>councils from Vatican two. Okay, then dogma contradicts.

2177
01:42:04.640 --> 01:42:06.039
<v Speaker 6>Okay, what's the argument.

2178
01:42:05.760 --> 01:42:09.720
<v Speaker 5>Dog Okay, guys, guys, guys, that's I got simply and straightforward.

2179
01:42:09.800 --> 01:42:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Least. It was also untrue when you said we don't

2180
01:42:12.520 --> 01:42:14.439
<v Speaker 4>have ordination, but that apparently doesn't matter today.

2181
01:42:14.479 --> 01:42:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, well, let's aboridation.

2182
01:42:16.039 --> 01:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go there, let's go there.

2183
01:42:17.640 --> 01:42:19.399
<v Speaker 4>It goes back to august How many how many?

2184
01:42:19.399 --> 01:42:22.199
<v Speaker 1>How many? How many years was the how many years

2185
01:42:22.239 --> 01:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was the g Hud?

2186
01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:24.439
<v Speaker 4>Augustin's goes back to Peter?

2187
01:42:25.680 --> 01:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Is that? How that?

2188
01:42:26.520 --> 01:42:28.680
<v Speaker 2>So the gihot goes from a No, we're we're having

2189
01:42:28.720 --> 01:42:30.439
<v Speaker 2>a separate debate again. Oh, because I asked a question

2190
01:42:30.439 --> 01:42:31.800
<v Speaker 2>about how many years was the gi Hud?

2191
01:42:31.840 --> 01:42:35.159
<v Speaker 6>You mean from the rise of Islam the literal.

2192
01:42:34.960 --> 01:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Like Gi had conquests across North Africa, the Middle.

2193
01:42:37.039 --> 01:42:42.439
<v Speaker 4>East, I argue, I mean moving westward, it was from

2194
01:42:42.800 --> 01:42:44.479
<v Speaker 4>it was basically one hundred years, six thirty two to

2195
01:42:44.479 --> 01:42:47.199
<v Speaker 4>seven thirty two. On the eastern side, it's not quite

2196
01:42:47.239 --> 01:42:50.720
<v Speaker 4>as linear because there's the immediate Arab move into the north,

2197
01:42:50.760 --> 01:42:52.840
<v Speaker 4>and then the Turks convert and they come back down south.

2198
01:42:53.159 --> 01:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Six seven fifty and eighteen years was when.

2199
01:42:56.800 --> 01:42:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Battle of tour Is seven thirty two. That's kind of

2200
01:42:58.800 --> 01:42:59.439
<v Speaker 4>the reversal.

2201
01:42:59.800 --> 01:43:03.880
<v Speaker 2>And then there were additional Jihads the eleventh and thirteenth century,

2202
01:43:04.039 --> 01:43:07.399
<v Speaker 2>two hundred years and so I'm looking at the birth

2203
01:43:07.479 --> 01:43:10.760
<v Speaker 2>rate for Muslims, which is three point one, as well

2204
01:43:10.800 --> 01:43:15.359
<v Speaker 2>as the hundreds of years of militaristic conquest under the

2205
01:43:15.399 --> 01:43:18.760
<v Speaker 2>banner of Islam, And like, how many battles of the

2206
01:43:18.760 --> 01:43:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Crusades were there? There were a lot, like nowhere near

2207
01:43:21.880 --> 01:43:23.479
<v Speaker 2>as many as the Islamic she Hod.

2208
01:43:24.600 --> 01:43:26.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's true. I think there were a

2209
01:43:26.520 --> 01:43:29.159
<v Speaker 4>lot more battle It really depends on Howmad fought in

2210
01:43:29.399 --> 01:43:33.680
<v Speaker 4>seventy eight battles seventy eight alone, there weren't that many

2211
01:43:33.720 --> 01:43:36.399
<v Speaker 4>in the Crusades as compared to the full total of

2212
01:43:36.479 --> 01:43:38.439
<v Speaker 4>Islamic she had. There were not as many battles during

2213
01:43:38.439 --> 01:43:39.000
<v Speaker 4>the Crusades.

2214
01:43:40.479 --> 01:43:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's see nine battles in the Crusades over two hundred years.

2215
01:43:45.439 --> 01:43:53.359
<v Speaker 4>I would argue against that. Maybe nine major battles. Yeah,

2216
01:43:53.840 --> 01:43:56.199
<v Speaker 4>and how really defining battles, I don't know.

2217
01:43:56.439 --> 01:44:01.000
<v Speaker 2>There were eighty to one hundred military expeditions in the

2218
01:44:01.039 --> 01:44:06.920
<v Speaker 2>first Islam a jihad. Yeah, so in terms of birth

2219
01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:12.199
<v Speaker 2>rate and expansion, I mean Islam's doing way better.

2220
01:44:12.279 --> 01:44:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I'm the missage Spirit.

2221
01:44:13.640 --> 01:44:16.560
<v Speaker 4>So I will say Islam. The ability of Islam to

2222
01:44:17.159 --> 01:44:21.279
<v Speaker 4>move after seven thirty two was largely due to the

2223
01:44:21.319 --> 01:44:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Turks coming in at a time that could not have

2224
01:44:23.760 --> 01:44:27.199
<v Speaker 4>been less ideal for Christians. These two were well, thankfully,

2225
01:44:27.199 --> 01:44:30.079
<v Speaker 4>we were the same at the sign were in conflict.

2226
01:44:30.199 --> 01:44:33.079
<v Speaker 4>There was a schism that had happened about twenty years earlier.

2227
01:44:33.760 --> 01:44:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Then you get the Battle of Nansukurt in ten seventy one,

2228
01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:40.119
<v Speaker 4>and the Byzantine Empire collapses in on itself because everybody

2229
01:44:40.159 --> 01:44:43.439
<v Speaker 4>wants to be emperor, and ironically, the Church wasn't strong

2230
01:44:43.560 --> 01:44:47.479
<v Speaker 4>enough to enforce one single emperor in the West. The

2231
01:44:47.560 --> 01:44:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Church wasn't strong enough to convince people, hey, we need

2232
01:44:50.039 --> 01:44:52.119
<v Speaker 4>to go drive the Turks out, and had to use

2233
01:44:52.279 --> 01:44:54.479
<v Speaker 4>Jerusalem as a little bit of a carrot on a stick.

2234
01:44:55.479 --> 01:44:57.880
<v Speaker 4>So the Muslims came in at a time when Christians

2235
01:44:57.880 --> 01:45:00.880
<v Speaker 4>were more divided than they had ever been, and we

2236
01:45:00.880 --> 01:45:04.439
<v Speaker 4>were unable to resist the tide until ten ninety five

2237
01:45:04.439 --> 01:45:06.319
<v Speaker 4>when we were able to assemble an army large enough

2238
01:45:06.359 --> 01:45:08.479
<v Speaker 4>to go and infight it. But at that point the

2239
01:45:08.479 --> 01:45:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Franks didn't want to stay over there. The Saracens became

2240
01:45:12.600 --> 01:45:16.920
<v Speaker 4>too numerous, too powerful. It was a long period of

2241
01:45:16.920 --> 01:45:19.920
<v Speaker 4>strife that was largely caused by Christianity's inability to come together.

2242
01:45:21.720 --> 01:45:24.119
<v Speaker 2>There was an argument a few years ago, maybe like

2243
01:45:24.159 --> 01:45:27.119
<v Speaker 2>seven years ago, where a lot of people, including myself,

2244
01:45:27.239 --> 01:45:29.720
<v Speaker 2>made the argument that the US would become a Muslim nation. No,

2245
01:45:30.079 --> 01:45:33.840
<v Speaker 2>because Muslims have a substantially higher fertility rate than basically

2246
01:45:33.840 --> 01:45:38.960
<v Speaker 2>every other group, including Christians, and that combined with mass migration,

2247
01:45:39.119 --> 01:45:42.079
<v Speaker 2>you see the emergency of places like Dearborn, Michigan. However,

2248
01:45:42.119 --> 01:45:45.920
<v Speaker 2>with the recent trend towards Christianity among the gen Z,

2249
01:45:46.520 --> 01:45:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and it's not just that Conservatives and Christians had more kids,

2250
01:45:50.760 --> 01:45:54.079
<v Speaker 2>we're actually seeing an ideological shift. And I think a

2251
01:45:54.159 --> 01:45:56.479
<v Speaker 2>large portion of why we're seeing young gen Z be

2252
01:45:56.600 --> 01:45:58.920
<v Speaker 2>more Christian is just because of their parents. But I

2253
01:45:58.920 --> 01:46:02.000
<v Speaker 2>think about half we are actually seeing an ideological conversion.

2254
01:46:02.079 --> 01:46:05.079
<v Speaker 2>One of which is there was this really interesting shift

2255
01:46:05.279 --> 01:46:08.359
<v Speaker 2>from like two thousand, i'm sorry, twenty twenty to like

2256
01:46:08.399 --> 01:46:10.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty three or whatever where gen Z support for same

2257
01:46:10.840 --> 01:46:14.479
<v Speaker 2>sis marriage collapsed, like literally the same people pulled at

2258
01:46:14.479 --> 01:46:16.680
<v Speaker 2>like twenty years old then at twenty four had an

2259
01:46:16.720 --> 01:46:21.640
<v Speaker 2>inverse opinion on gay marriage. So that if combined with

2260
01:46:22.560 --> 01:46:26.159
<v Speaker 2>a reversal of the fertility rate decline, which may happen,

2261
01:46:26.359 --> 01:46:27.560
<v Speaker 2>we're as seeing a lot of people start to have

2262
01:46:27.640 --> 01:46:29.920
<v Speaker 2>kids again, then I think the US is on track

2263
01:46:29.920 --> 01:46:32.359
<v Speaker 2>to become a conservative Christian nation probably.

2264
01:46:32.399 --> 01:46:34.439
<v Speaker 3>In fact, one of the global elite books that I

2265
01:46:34.640 --> 01:46:37.159
<v Speaker 3>lectured through was Jacques at the Leed's book Brievious Read

2266
01:46:37.199 --> 01:46:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the Future in two thousand and six. He warned that

2267
01:46:39.720 --> 01:46:42.159
<v Speaker 3>for the technocratic elite, one of the things they had

2268
01:46:42.159 --> 01:46:44.760
<v Speaker 3>to be concerned with was the possibility of a rising

2269
01:46:45.319 --> 01:46:48.000
<v Speaker 3>traditional Christian ethos in the West and in the US.

2270
01:46:48.199 --> 01:46:51.800
<v Speaker 3>So they actually wargamed that out. And a few years

2271
01:46:51.840 --> 01:46:55.279
<v Speaker 3>ago the Saudis were noted for I think putting sixty

2272
01:46:55.359 --> 01:46:59.760
<v Speaker 3>something billion into funding mosques in the US and Islamic education,

2273
01:46:59.840 --> 01:47:00.520
<v Speaker 3>So I.

2274
01:47:00.520 --> 01:47:01.840
<v Speaker 6>Think they were really pushing for that.

2275
01:47:01.880 --> 01:47:04.159
<v Speaker 3>But Islam has been has had a rough go on

2276
01:47:04.199 --> 01:47:06.239
<v Speaker 3>the internet, especially the last couple of years. They're losing

2277
01:47:06.279 --> 01:47:08.640
<v Speaker 3>bad and then a lot of younger people are turning

2278
01:47:08.640 --> 01:47:09.479
<v Speaker 3>towards Christianity.

2279
01:47:09.600 --> 01:47:11.000
<v Speaker 2>So I have a question for you guys, just for

2280
01:47:11.079 --> 01:47:14.119
<v Speaker 2>all Christians I believe, is it Is it one of

2281
01:47:14.119 --> 01:47:16.479
<v Speaker 2>the core tenants to go and spread the religion.

2282
01:47:18.119 --> 01:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys view yourselves as as doing that?

2283
01:47:21.319 --> 01:47:24.640
<v Speaker 4>I would say yes in this current present moment right now,

2284
01:47:24.840 --> 01:47:25.960
<v Speaker 4>I think in just general.

2285
01:47:25.720 --> 01:47:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, I'll talk about that general on large

2286
01:47:27.800 --> 01:47:29.359
<v Speaker 2>platforms to large groups of people.

2287
01:47:29.479 --> 01:47:30.199
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, certainly.

2288
01:47:30.239 --> 01:47:34.279
<v Speaker 5>And evangelization sounds different than the in turn of scene

2289
01:47:35.079 --> 01:47:37.880
<v Speaker 5>squabbling between ethics in Orthodox certainly.

2290
01:47:37.960 --> 01:47:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think.

2291
01:47:38.680 --> 01:47:40.760
<v Speaker 5>I think, I'm sure all of us try to do

2292
01:47:40.840 --> 01:47:44.319
<v Speaker 5>that in a different form for in platforms.

2293
01:47:45.000 --> 01:47:45.520
<v Speaker 4>I certainly do.

2294
01:47:45.560 --> 01:47:47.119
<v Speaker 3>Also, Yeah, I mean, like I said, like Islam is

2295
01:47:47.159 --> 01:47:49.239
<v Speaker 3>having a hard time because they had a really strong

2296
01:47:49.319 --> 01:47:51.079
<v Speaker 3>push in the twenty tens online and a lot of

2297
01:47:51.079 --> 01:47:54.199
<v Speaker 3>people are getting into into Islam. But now a lot

2298
01:47:54.239 --> 01:47:57.640
<v Speaker 3>of Christians are doing pretty intense hardcore apologetics. Like we

2299
01:47:57.720 --> 01:48:02.199
<v Speaker 3>had that debate with Daniel Kikachu and e Jaws together

2300
01:48:02.199 --> 01:48:04.079
<v Speaker 3>at Me and Sam Chamoun on Fresh and Fit. I

2301
01:48:04.119 --> 01:48:06.079
<v Speaker 3>got millions of views and it was like ninety percent

2302
01:48:06.279 --> 01:48:07.520
<v Speaker 3>just dominated.

2303
01:48:07.359 --> 01:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean Russell Brand. Yeah, you know, so I in

2304
01:48:11.560 --> 01:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the skateboard.

2305
01:48:12.119 --> 01:48:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Community, it's degenerate garbage. Mostly these pro skateboarders have always

2306
01:48:18.359 --> 01:48:20.560
<v Speaker 2>been scuzzy, drug abusing, Now that there's a bunch of

2307
01:48:20.560 --> 01:48:23.079
<v Speaker 2>them that are getting baptized. Yeah, I'm not going to

2308
01:48:23.199 --> 01:48:25.920
<v Speaker 2>single any anybody out, but I was surprised.

2309
01:48:25.479 --> 01:48:28.640
<v Speaker 3>To find didn't skating get like the corporations try to

2310
01:48:28.640 --> 01:48:30.319
<v Speaker 3>take it over, like make it woke, and then people

2311
01:48:30.319 --> 01:48:31.239
<v Speaker 3>are reacting to that now.

2312
01:48:31.319 --> 01:48:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, so with skateboarding, what happened was the industry completely

2313
01:48:33.960 --> 01:48:37.479
<v Speaker 2>collapsed because there's no young people anymore, and the stewards

2314
01:48:37.520 --> 01:48:40.960
<v Speaker 2>of the industry failed to cultivate a new generation of skateboarders.

2315
01:48:41.399 --> 01:48:43.800
<v Speaker 2>So what happens then is, as of today, more than

2316
01:48:43.840 --> 01:48:46.800
<v Speaker 2>half of all professional like all all skateboards active skateboarder,

2317
01:48:46.800 --> 01:48:50.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't say professional, are over thirty. What happens when

2318
01:48:50.560 --> 01:48:53.720
<v Speaker 2>the water goes down, it exposes the scum in the reef.

2319
01:48:54.159 --> 01:48:56.119
<v Speaker 2>And so now some of the most prominent voices in

2320
01:48:56.119 --> 01:48:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the industry are degenerate, yeah, cringey.

2321
01:48:58.920 --> 01:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Rage bait.

2322
01:49:00.119 --> 01:49:04.199
<v Speaker 2>And so what happens is these companies try to figure

2323
01:49:04.239 --> 01:49:07.239
<v Speaker 2>out how to sell to whoever they can, and you

2324
01:49:07.399 --> 01:49:10.600
<v Speaker 2>end up with advertisements or there may be an inverse

2325
01:49:10.960 --> 01:49:15.199
<v Speaker 2>correlation here that when the company started promoting you know,

2326
01:49:15.279 --> 01:49:17.439
<v Speaker 2>like men penny be women doing weird fetish poses, and

2327
01:49:17.479 --> 01:49:19.800
<v Speaker 2>they are it's not a joke. Young guys say, I

2328
01:49:19.840 --> 01:49:22.079
<v Speaker 2>don't have anything to do with this because scooting doesn't

2329
01:49:22.079 --> 01:49:25.800
<v Speaker 2>do that. Scooting doesn't and that's growing massively in popularity.

2330
01:49:26.239 --> 01:49:28.479
<v Speaker 2>All the skills are now in terms of action sports

2331
01:49:28.520 --> 01:49:30.840
<v Speaker 2>are going in that direction in BMX, and this is

2332
01:49:30.880 --> 01:49:33.159
<v Speaker 2>what happens when you know what I think it is

2333
01:49:33.159 --> 01:49:37.880
<v Speaker 2>to relate this to the conversation, abject degeneracy freaks the

2334
01:49:37.920 --> 01:49:40.560
<v Speaker 2>average person out, no matter what, no matter who they are,

2335
01:49:40.600 --> 01:49:43.680
<v Speaker 2>where they're from. It is a shock to the system.

2336
01:49:44.039 --> 01:49:46.920
<v Speaker 2>So skateboarding started promoting there's like there's one individual whos

2337
01:49:46.920 --> 01:49:50.800
<v Speaker 2>a morbidly obese man who's trans and does fetish like

2338
01:49:50.840 --> 01:49:53.439
<v Speaker 2>weird sexualized fetish poses. But it's like it's like a

2339
01:49:53.479 --> 01:49:56.920
<v Speaker 2>big fat guy, and a lot of a lot of

2340
01:49:56.960 --> 01:49:57.800
<v Speaker 2>young men are.

2341
01:49:57.640 --> 01:49:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Like I I don't want to have anything to do with that.

2342
01:50:01.039 --> 01:50:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I think now we're seeing a lot of young men

2343
01:50:02.960 --> 01:50:04.880
<v Speaker 2>shift towards Christianity.

2344
01:50:04.880 --> 01:50:05.720
<v Speaker 1>That's in the polls.

2345
01:50:06.680 --> 01:50:08.840
<v Speaker 2>That may be a good explanation as to why skateboarding

2346
01:50:08.880 --> 01:50:12.720
<v Speaker 2>is struggling to market itself to your generation, because all

2347
01:50:12.760 --> 01:50:16.439
<v Speaker 2>the big magazines are basically being like, you know, here's

2348
01:50:16.479 --> 01:50:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a trends in the queer stuff.

2349
01:50:17.560 --> 01:50:21.560
<v Speaker 5>And it's not internal to one culture or another subculture.

2350
01:50:21.600 --> 01:50:25.680
<v Speaker 5>This is what's at large in the general popular culture

2351
01:50:25.840 --> 01:50:29.439
<v Speaker 5>is a great reawakening essentially secular humanism.

2352
01:50:29.520 --> 01:50:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm not the first one to say it.

2353
01:50:30.760 --> 01:50:36.000
<v Speaker 5>It's reasonably obvious of ten years into it. Secularly humanism

2354
01:50:36.039 --> 01:50:39.800
<v Speaker 5>has consumed itself and people are looking for what's perennial

2355
01:50:39.880 --> 01:50:43.520
<v Speaker 5>and what's true. And it turns out that a lot

2356
01:50:43.520 --> 01:50:47.680
<v Speaker 5>of young kids are are finding Jesus based and so

2357
01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:52.239
<v Speaker 5>when they're returning to Christianity, they're looking for what they

2358
01:50:52.479 --> 01:50:54.600
<v Speaker 5>take to be a based version of it, which is

2359
01:50:54.600 --> 01:50:58.079
<v Speaker 5>why they're leaving Protestantism in droves and going to.

2360
01:50:59.399 --> 01:51:02.039
<v Speaker 4>Greater struct Sure, more and more structure is all I'm saying.

2361
01:51:02.199 --> 01:51:05.119
<v Speaker 5>So they're going to Orthodox or twenty twenty four was

2362
01:51:05.199 --> 01:51:09.279
<v Speaker 5>Roman Catholicism's I think greatest year of re embrace of

2363
01:51:09.319 --> 01:51:11.760
<v Speaker 5>the church? Pod how many people leave in the Catholicism

2364
01:51:11.760 --> 01:51:14.880
<v Speaker 5>for every person who joins it, You tell me, I

2365
01:51:14.880 --> 01:51:16.359
<v Speaker 5>believe it's something I'm not going to tell you.

2366
01:51:16.399 --> 01:51:20.279
<v Speaker 4>There's something like six to eight. Yeah, Well, one.

2367
01:51:20.119 --> 01:51:23.920
<v Speaker 5>Last year was the best year in the New evangelization,

2368
01:51:24.079 --> 01:51:27.600
<v Speaker 5>which is what what Jumpaul the second set out to

2369
01:51:27.600 --> 01:51:31.720
<v Speaker 5>do using media using the self Malaysia.

2370
01:51:32.399 --> 01:51:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I googled it and it I'm sorry, I checked

2371
01:51:36.560 --> 01:51:39.720
<v Speaker 2>GPT did it and it says that Protestants are converting

2372
01:51:39.760 --> 01:51:41.239
<v Speaker 2>to Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.

2373
01:51:41.479 --> 01:51:41.840
<v Speaker 1>We are.

2374
01:51:43.319 --> 01:51:45.359
<v Speaker 4>It should be clear that you dispute a lot. So

2375
01:51:45.560 --> 01:51:47.359
<v Speaker 4>I did not dispute that. I think you did.

2376
01:51:47.439 --> 01:51:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I did not see one hundred and fifty five per

2377
01:51:49.640 --> 01:51:53.720
<v Speaker 2>parish in from twenty two to twenty three, I said, leaving,

2378
01:51:54.319 --> 01:51:55.359
<v Speaker 2>that's that's not a good metric.

2379
01:51:55.560 --> 01:51:56.800
<v Speaker 1>There's no real good metric.

2380
01:51:56.960 --> 01:51:59.359
<v Speaker 2>They say seventy eight percent surge and Orthodox conversions, but

2381
01:51:59.399 --> 01:52:04.000
<v Speaker 2>again we don't know how the actual hard numbers. Orthodoxy

2382
01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:07.439
<v Speaker 2>is seeing one hundred and fifty five converts converts per church,

2383
01:52:07.560 --> 01:52:09.720
<v Speaker 2>of which sixty five are from Protestant backgrounds.

2384
01:52:09.960 --> 01:52:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think Protestantism has a major issue right now

2385
01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:15.960
<v Speaker 4>with first of all, with how divided we are. I

2386
01:52:15.960 --> 01:52:18.439
<v Speaker 4>don't think that's a good thing. I think that the

2387
01:52:18.439 --> 01:52:22.039
<v Speaker 4>Episcopal Church, many of the Presbyterian churches have totally lost

2388
01:52:22.079 --> 01:52:24.239
<v Speaker 4>their way. Oh yeah, and that I mean, that's why

2389
01:52:24.279 --> 01:52:28.319
<v Speaker 4>Thenking Catholic Church exists. I think Protestants need to really

2390
01:52:28.399 --> 01:52:30.119
<v Speaker 4>look in the mirror and ask ourselves what the hell

2391
01:52:30.159 --> 01:52:30.520
<v Speaker 4>we're doing.

2392
01:52:30.640 --> 01:52:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me say this.

2393
01:52:31.359 --> 01:52:34.680
<v Speaker 2>When I, when I was looking up different denominations, chet

2394
01:52:34.720 --> 01:52:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Gptier volunteered unto.

2395
01:52:36.439 --> 01:52:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Me that the Episcopal Church was was shrinking.

2396
01:52:39.800 --> 01:52:40.279
<v Speaker 4>It's bad.

2397
01:52:40.520 --> 01:52:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Like when I when I said, like, list lists of

2398
01:52:42.640 --> 01:52:45.560
<v Speaker 2>the churches by a fertility rate, it was like, you know,

2399
01:52:45.600 --> 01:52:46.640
<v Speaker 2>as a possable is shrinking.

2400
01:52:46.840 --> 01:52:50.319
<v Speaker 3>All the wolde churches are basically adopting sterility, so they

2401
01:52:50.319 --> 01:52:52.840
<v Speaker 3>sterilize themselves with their policies, and then they don't have

2402
01:52:52.880 --> 01:52:54.479
<v Speaker 3>future generations and they die out.

2403
01:52:54.560 --> 01:52:58.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the conservative the Conservative Protestant churches aren't as good

2404
01:52:58.199 --> 01:53:01.039
<v Speaker 4>at marketing. We are not nearly as good at telling

2405
01:53:01.039 --> 01:53:04.239
<v Speaker 4>people we exist. The Roman Catholic and the Orthodox churches

2406
01:53:04.239 --> 01:53:05.960
<v Speaker 4>are both very visible. I think that's why you see

2407
01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:08.479
<v Speaker 4>so many Protestants converting right now. I think if more

2408
01:53:08.479 --> 01:53:12.319
<v Speaker 4>Protestants were aware of churches like the Anglican Catholics, there

2409
01:53:12.359 --> 01:53:14.960
<v Speaker 4>would be higher numbers of people converting to the Conservative

2410
01:53:14.960 --> 01:53:18.279
<v Speaker 4>Protestant churches as well. But we suffer from that problem

2411
01:53:18.399 --> 01:53:21.880
<v Speaker 4>of being at schism with ourselves. In so many cases, there.

2412
01:53:22.199 --> 01:53:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Are a lot of churches that fly the Pride flags,

2413
01:53:24.600 --> 01:53:25.600
<v Speaker 2>even Catholic churches.

2414
01:53:25.680 --> 01:53:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're popping up. They tend to be in liberal areas.

2415
01:53:28.920 --> 01:53:32.600
<v Speaker 2>And I view that largely as the church is looking

2416
01:53:32.640 --> 01:53:35.680
<v Speaker 2>at the political views of the community around them, and

2417
01:53:35.680 --> 01:53:38.720
<v Speaker 2>they're probably saying to themselves, in one year, this church

2418
01:53:38.720 --> 01:53:41.960
<v Speaker 2>will be a coffee shop unless we get more parishioners.

2419
01:53:42.199 --> 01:53:44.319
<v Speaker 1>What do we have to do? Market whatever they want

2420
01:53:44.359 --> 01:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to get?

2421
01:53:44.720 --> 01:53:46.039
<v Speaker 3>Woe churches die, It doesn't work.

2422
01:53:46.239 --> 01:53:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it doesn't. But you know I'll say this too.

2423
01:53:48.880 --> 01:53:50.079
<v Speaker 4>He die and the faith dies with them.

2424
01:53:50.199 --> 01:53:51.439
<v Speaker 1>And many people have.

2425
01:53:51.359 --> 01:53:53.399
<v Speaker 2>Said get what, go broke, But I do believe while

2426
01:53:53.399 --> 01:53:56.520
<v Speaker 2>that's largely true, there's an inverse of go broke, get woke,

2427
01:53:57.000 --> 01:53:59.359
<v Speaker 2>in that a lot of companies try to adopt. They

2428
01:53:59.359 --> 01:54:02.199
<v Speaker 2>try to adopt wokeness is a marketing tactic to try

2429
01:54:02.239 --> 01:54:04.399
<v Speaker 2>and get but they don't Understan hippies don't have money.

2430
01:54:04.439 --> 01:54:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Now it's well, it's a boomer marketing appeal that that

2431
01:54:07.239 --> 01:54:09.760
<v Speaker 5>was really I'll speak to the Catholic position. It was

2432
01:54:09.800 --> 01:54:13.479
<v Speaker 5>really popular during an a round Vatican two, and they

2433
01:54:13.520 --> 01:54:18.359
<v Speaker 5>thought that kids wanted the monkeys music and and long

2434
01:54:18.399 --> 01:54:19.920
<v Speaker 5>hair and masks and tambourines and.

2435
01:54:19.920 --> 01:54:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Ship and they simply didn't.

2436
01:54:21.960 --> 01:54:25.159
<v Speaker 5>What they wanted was what's perennial and true and that

2437
01:54:25.159 --> 01:54:26.560
<v Speaker 5>that's that's really what's Let.

2438
01:54:26.520 --> 01:54:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Me let me say this. There's this uh oft quoted study.

2439
01:54:31.800 --> 01:54:33.960
<v Speaker 2>You have to look it up where they they told people,

2440
01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:36.119
<v Speaker 2>come in, it's a it's a study. You're gonna you're

2441
01:54:36.119 --> 01:54:38.720
<v Speaker 2>gonna ask answer some questions, and then afterwards you get

2442
01:54:38.720 --> 01:54:41.479
<v Speaker 2>a free T shirt. People came in the first group

2443
01:54:41.640 --> 01:54:43.159
<v Speaker 2>answer the questions and as they were leaving they were

2444
01:54:43.159 --> 01:54:45.079
<v Speaker 2>given a free T shirt. They were then on the

2445
01:54:45.079 --> 01:54:47.560
<v Speaker 2>way out asked how do they feel about their experience.

2446
01:54:48.159 --> 01:54:50.920
<v Speaker 2>The next group came in answer the questions, were then

2447
01:54:50.960 --> 01:54:53.479
<v Speaker 2>given a choice between one of three T shirts blue, green,

2448
01:54:53.600 --> 01:54:53.960
<v Speaker 2>or red.

2449
01:54:54.359 --> 01:54:56.159
<v Speaker 1>They then made a choice. They were then on the

2450
01:54:56.199 --> 01:54:57.319
<v Speaker 1>way out asked how they felt.

2451
01:54:57.560 --> 01:55:00.359
<v Speaker 2>The people who were given the choice felt worse soft,

2452
01:55:00.840 --> 01:55:03.680
<v Speaker 2>They felt regret they picked the wrong color. The people

2453
01:55:03.680 --> 01:55:05.399
<v Speaker 2>who aren't given a choice went wow, free T shirt,

2454
01:55:05.920 --> 01:55:08.079
<v Speaker 2>but when they had to choose between the colors, it

2455
01:55:08.159 --> 01:55:11.479
<v Speaker 2>actually made them feel worse. And this is often cited

2456
01:55:11.560 --> 01:55:16.199
<v Speaker 2>as a in many insins not all choice actually stresses

2457
01:55:16.199 --> 01:55:17.960
<v Speaker 2>people out and makes them feel anxiety.

2458
01:55:17.960 --> 01:55:18.640
<v Speaker 1>They don't like it.

2459
01:55:19.239 --> 01:55:22.199
<v Speaker 2>And so a lot of people, not everybody, but a

2460
01:55:22.199 --> 01:55:23.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of people really just want to be told what

2461
01:55:23.680 --> 01:55:27.560
<v Speaker 2>to do. And I've said this before, because there's this

2462
01:55:27.960 --> 01:55:30.239
<v Speaker 2>mentality United States that being a follower is a bad thing.

2463
01:55:30.560 --> 01:55:32.800
<v Speaker 2>You want to be a leader, and I reject that.

2464
01:55:33.039 --> 01:55:36.680
<v Speaker 2>There's a requirement before both leaders and followers. And they

2465
01:55:36.720 --> 01:55:39.439
<v Speaker 2>try to insult you in modern media if you are

2466
01:55:39.520 --> 01:55:41.279
<v Speaker 2>just a follower of someone, because you have to be

2467
01:55:41.319 --> 01:55:44.119
<v Speaker 2>the leader. And I say, when the king is standing

2468
01:55:44.159 --> 01:55:46.039
<v Speaker 2>before all of his men in the fields, ready to

2469
01:55:46.119 --> 01:55:48.239
<v Speaker 2>die for the world that they believe in and the

2470
01:55:48.239 --> 01:55:51.079
<v Speaker 2>things they love, those followers of the king are no

2471
01:55:51.199 --> 01:55:53.880
<v Speaker 2>less dignified simply because they're not the king. In fact,

2472
01:55:53.880 --> 01:55:56.920
<v Speaker 2>without them, there is no king. So being a follower

2473
01:55:56.960 --> 01:56:00.279
<v Speaker 2>isn't a bad thing. And they you know, I think

2474
01:56:00.319 --> 01:56:01.840
<v Speaker 2>modern society tries to tell you.

2475
01:56:01.760 --> 01:56:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Not to not to do that. Absolutely be rogue.

2476
01:56:04.920 --> 01:56:08.119
<v Speaker 2>No, it's perfectly fine. If you want to say, listen,

2477
01:56:08.640 --> 01:56:12.239
<v Speaker 2>I spend my days taking care of my family. You

2478
01:56:12.279 --> 01:56:14.439
<v Speaker 2>take care of the politics I believe in. You do

2479
01:56:14.479 --> 01:56:17.079
<v Speaker 2>the right thing. Don't screw me over. There's nothing wrong

2480
01:56:17.159 --> 01:56:17.439
<v Speaker 2>with it.

2481
01:56:18.439 --> 01:56:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Modernity is enlightenment, right, a Enlightenment effect. So the Enlightenment

2482
01:56:23.680 --> 01:56:28.600
<v Speaker 3>was all about individual atimistic liberties which premised were premised

2483
01:56:28.640 --> 01:56:31.479
<v Speaker 3>on the idea that there's no authority, there's no hierarchy.

2484
01:56:31.520 --> 01:56:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Hence why they were opposed to church and state monarchy.

2485
01:56:34.720 --> 01:56:36.119
<v Speaker 3>Monarchy in church yea.

2486
01:56:36.279 --> 01:56:37.319
<v Speaker 1>And I will say this too.

2487
01:56:37.640 --> 01:56:38.680
<v Speaker 2>One of the debates we have to have in the

2488
01:56:38.720 --> 01:56:43.840
<v Speaker 2>political arena around religion is that there's this romanticized, fake

2489
01:56:44.039 --> 01:56:47.840
<v Speaker 2>liberal view that the Founding Fathers believed in this hyperliberal

2490
01:56:47.880 --> 01:56:49.560
<v Speaker 2>society where anyone could say whatever they wanted.

2491
01:56:49.760 --> 01:56:53.039
<v Speaker 1>They had blasphemy laws back then. Even when the Founding

2492
01:56:53.039 --> 01:56:55.119
<v Speaker 1>father says the right to speech shall not be infringed.

2493
01:56:55.520 --> 01:56:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Of course, no one in this room thinks you can

2494
01:56:57.880 --> 01:56:59.479
<v Speaker 2>go out there and say, you know, and take the

2495
01:56:59.479 --> 01:56:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Lord's name in.

2496
01:57:00.319 --> 01:57:01.159
<v Speaker 1>That would be a crime.

2497
01:57:01.680 --> 01:57:04.399
<v Speaker 2>They meant you could go and have political conversations in

2498
01:57:04.439 --> 01:57:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a pub.

2499
01:57:05.560 --> 01:57:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And so when you look at.

2500
01:57:06.960 --> 01:57:11.399
<v Speaker 2>The context around the Constitution seventeen eighty nine and all that,

2501
01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:15.000
<v Speaker 2>they weren't literally saying anyone can march the street to

2502
01:57:15.039 --> 01:57:17.359
<v Speaker 2>the tombs of thousands of people in block roads. They

2503
01:57:17.359 --> 01:57:20.319
<v Speaker 2>were saying, if you have a meeting in your city

2504
01:57:20.520 --> 01:57:23.399
<v Speaker 2>peacefully to have conversations. The government can't shut you down

2505
01:57:23.399 --> 01:57:25.760
<v Speaker 2>because the crown wanted to shut them down. But these

2506
01:57:25.760 --> 01:57:27.720
<v Speaker 2>people think the Founding Fathers were a bunch of like

2507
01:57:27.760 --> 01:57:31.000
<v Speaker 2>liberal atheis no.

2508
01:57:32.439 --> 01:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Blaspheming.

2509
01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:33.359
<v Speaker 6>Eight of the.

2510
01:57:33.279 --> 01:57:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Thirteen states had establishments of Christian religions, and the First

2511
01:57:38.600 --> 01:57:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Amendment to the US Constitution was written assuming that all

2512
01:57:41.600 --> 01:57:45.920
<v Speaker 4>thirteen would. And what the establishment clause means literally was

2513
01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:49.680
<v Speaker 4>that Congress and Congress alone shall not make a law

2514
01:57:49.800 --> 01:57:53.720
<v Speaker 4>respecting a disestablishment of religion. Congress wasn't allowed to.

2515
01:57:53.680 --> 01:57:59.560
<v Speaker 5>Disestablish the state legislature established sex of Christianity. That's literally

2516
01:57:59.600 --> 01:58:03.720
<v Speaker 5>what it means ins And it was a Masonic US

2517
01:58:03.760 --> 01:58:06.039
<v Speaker 5>Supreme Court in nineteen forty seven in the case called

2518
01:58:06.039 --> 01:58:10.119
<v Speaker 5>Everson versus Board of Bed that literally reversed the meaning

2519
01:58:10.359 --> 01:58:12.880
<v Speaker 5>and incorporated the First Amendment.

2520
01:58:12.920 --> 01:58:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Today you know of which like Enlightenment, free Masonic values.

2521
01:58:15.640 --> 01:58:17.800
<v Speaker 3>How do you reconcile Freemasonry with Christianity?

2522
01:58:18.680 --> 01:58:20.920
<v Speaker 4>What about freemasonry is in conflict with Christianity?

2523
01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:22.720
<v Speaker 3>How about Albert Pike's teachings?

2524
01:58:22.920 --> 01:58:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Albert Pike is not recognized as influential by most Masons.

2525
01:58:27.039 --> 01:58:30.600
<v Speaker 4>His teachings are non essential Freemason.

2526
01:58:30.640 --> 01:58:31.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, worls and dogmas.

2527
01:58:31.479 --> 01:58:33.760
<v Speaker 4>I'll admit I've had my questions because I have run

2528
01:58:33.760 --> 01:58:34.920
<v Speaker 4>into things.

2529
01:58:35.039 --> 01:58:36.680
<v Speaker 6>Dogmas not used in the Scottish right.

2530
01:58:36.840 --> 01:58:38.439
<v Speaker 4>No, it is used in the southern jurisdiction of the

2531
01:58:38.479 --> 01:58:39.319
<v Speaker 4>Scottish Right in the Southern.

2532
01:58:39.399 --> 01:58:42.000
<v Speaker 3>So so he has a giant statue in DC, but

2533
01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:42.800
<v Speaker 3>he's not influential.

2534
01:58:42.960 --> 01:58:45.439
<v Speaker 4>He was influential for a number of other reasons. Secularly,

2535
01:58:46.239 --> 01:58:49.479
<v Speaker 4>what about Mamneroal He was a accomplished ethnographer.

2536
01:58:50.039 --> 01:58:52.640
<v Speaker 6>Okay, what about Manley P. Hall? It's he also doesn't count.

2537
01:58:52.680 --> 01:58:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Manley P. Hall admitted that he wrote everything that you

2538
01:58:55.680 --> 01:58:57.640
<v Speaker 4>have a problem with before he became a freemason.

2539
01:58:58.399 --> 01:58:59.560
<v Speaker 6>What masons do count?

2540
01:59:00.279 --> 01:59:02.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, it depends a lot of talking about with freemasonry.

2541
01:59:02.159 --> 01:59:04.319
<v Speaker 4>I mean the philo free masonry is the first three degrees,

2542
01:59:04.600 --> 01:59:05.159
<v Speaker 4>that's it, or.

2543
01:59:05.119 --> 01:59:07.800
<v Speaker 3>The philosophy what is not true? There's there's thirty, second,

2544
01:59:07.840 --> 01:59:08.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty third degree.

2545
01:59:08.760 --> 01:59:10.760
<v Speaker 4>There are in the Scottish Right, which is a pellet

2546
01:59:10.760 --> 01:59:12.479
<v Speaker 4>to freemasonry. It's like getting in there at badge.

2547
01:59:12.520 --> 01:59:14.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I don't care about what your terms are

2548
01:59:14.439 --> 01:59:17.199
<v Speaker 3>for these different sexs when these aren't they have a

2549
01:59:17.319 --> 01:59:19.399
<v Speaker 3>naturalistic bent and ethos.

2550
01:59:19.439 --> 01:59:20.960
<v Speaker 6>For example, Pike says.

2551
01:59:20.720 --> 01:59:22.239
<v Speaker 4>That Pike is irrelevant to me.

2552
01:59:22.399 --> 01:59:22.680
<v Speaker 6>He's not.

2553
01:59:22.800 --> 01:59:24.720
<v Speaker 4>He's do you have but not to the history freemaks. No,

2554
01:59:24.800 --> 01:59:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Pike is irrelevant to everything outside of Freemason. Is irrelevant

2555
01:59:27.880 --> 01:59:31.359
<v Speaker 4>to the history of Freemasonry, general Freemason. Here, who's the

2556
01:59:31.359 --> 01:59:32.399
<v Speaker 4>one who knows what he's talking about?

2557
01:59:32.399 --> 01:59:33.520
<v Speaker 6>It's not an appeal to authority.

2558
01:59:33.560 --> 01:59:34.000
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not.

2559
01:59:34.079 --> 01:59:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it is, I'm trying to You're not yourself. Albert

2560
01:59:37.760 --> 01:59:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Pike is a source. Add No, Albert Pike is a

2561
01:59:42.800 --> 01:59:46.399
<v Speaker 3>source for the Southern the Southern jurisdiction.

2562
01:59:46.720 --> 01:59:52.039
<v Speaker 6>You're telling me that. How about your Themazini? Does he is?

2563
01:59:52.079 --> 01:59:52.600
<v Speaker 4>He p two?

2564
01:59:52.960 --> 01:59:55.119
<v Speaker 3>No, he's in the Grand Orient Lodge.

2565
01:59:55.279 --> 01:59:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Grand Orient, not regular.

2566
01:59:57.199 --> 01:59:58.319
<v Speaker 6>So what counts?

2567
01:59:58.600 --> 02:00:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Uh? The three degrees of the Craft lodges mainly split

2568
02:00:05.000 --> 02:00:07.800
<v Speaker 4>between England and the United States. So the York right

2569
02:00:07.920 --> 02:00:10.000
<v Speaker 4>is that what the York Right, like the Scottish right,

2570
02:00:10.079 --> 02:00:12.239
<v Speaker 4>is a pellet and is not held in union with

2571
02:00:12.279 --> 02:00:13.399
<v Speaker 4>all free Masonic ideals.

2572
02:00:13.520 --> 02:00:16.520
<v Speaker 3>So and the British Empire did what What was the

2573
02:00:16.560 --> 02:00:18.279
<v Speaker 3>function of Freemason in the British Empire?

2574
02:00:18.279 --> 02:00:21.079
<v Speaker 4>In your view, it was a social club?

2575
02:00:21.359 --> 02:00:23.159
<v Speaker 6>Is it a sorry, a speculative Mason?

2576
02:00:23.840 --> 02:00:25.359
<v Speaker 4>All Masons are speculative Masons.

2577
02:00:25.520 --> 02:00:26.000
<v Speaker 6>No, they're not.

2578
02:00:26.439 --> 02:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>The original Masons were they were, They were stone workers,

2579
02:00:30.000 --> 02:00:31.439
<v Speaker 3>They weren't speculative free Mason.

2580
02:00:31.720 --> 02:00:34.920
<v Speaker 4>And yes, it did originate from operative Masons in the

2581
02:00:35.000 --> 02:00:39.199
<v Speaker 4>late thirteen hundreds as a Catholic organization which very explicitly

2582
02:00:39.600 --> 02:00:43.079
<v Speaker 4>held that you must love the Church with God and

2583
02:00:43.119 --> 02:00:43.720
<v Speaker 4>the Church without.

2584
02:00:43.720 --> 02:00:45.840
<v Speaker 6>You're not speculative freemasonry.

2585
02:00:45.399 --> 02:00:47.800
<v Speaker 4>All right, it was. It was the origin of speculative

2586
02:00:47.800 --> 02:00:52.359
<v Speaker 4>free poem, Catholicist poem.

2587
02:00:52.520 --> 02:00:55.000
<v Speaker 6>Catholic churches condemned you for centuries.

2588
02:00:54.600 --> 02:00:58.319
<v Speaker 5>Seven times, seven different times.

2589
02:00:57.720 --> 02:01:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Why why tell me why I know? Why do you

2590
02:01:01.039 --> 02:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>do you know? Why?

2591
02:01:01.640 --> 02:01:01.840
<v Speaker 5>You know?

2592
02:01:02.000 --> 02:01:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Because you know why the pope inside eight? Shut up,

2593
02:01:04.760 --> 02:01:07.479
<v Speaker 3>I've read the paper. You've been interrupting me while asking

2594
02:01:07.520 --> 02:01:09.319
<v Speaker 3>because your answers are stupid, Okay.

2595
02:01:09.119 --> 02:01:11.359
<v Speaker 4>Not stupid. You don't know what you're talking about this song?

2596
02:01:11.439 --> 02:01:14.199
<v Speaker 4>And no, do you know why secret?

2597
02:01:14.399 --> 02:01:15.520
<v Speaker 6>Because you're acting as.

2598
02:01:15.399 --> 02:01:20.640
<v Speaker 4>A seventeen thirty eight inhumanium in humanim mo janus. Yeah,

2599
02:01:20.680 --> 02:01:22.439
<v Speaker 4>in that one, what was the reason he gets?

2600
02:01:22.439 --> 02:01:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Sure to watch Tim kastier Raltz and I at eight pm.

2601
02:01:24.720 --> 02:01:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Guys were over time, okay, and if we have more

2602
02:01:27.560 --> 02:01:28.960
<v Speaker 2>time I'd say, let's let's get into Macon.

2603
02:01:29.119 --> 02:01:30.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm happy to come back and do masonry.

2604
02:01:30.600 --> 02:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's do another one on the freemake.

2605
02:01:31.800 --> 02:01:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Even just from the historical perspective, I think I think

2606
02:01:33.880 --> 02:01:34.920
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't know what he's talking about.

2607
02:01:34.960 --> 02:01:38.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, okay, I think, but you're lying because Albert Pike

2608
02:01:38.439 --> 02:01:39.560
<v Speaker 3>is very influential.

2609
02:01:39.640 --> 02:01:42.439
<v Speaker 4>Albert Pike is not influential outside of the Southern jurisdiction

2610
02:01:42.479 --> 02:01:46.000
<v Speaker 4>at the Scottish Masonry All right, do you do you want

2611
02:01:46.000 --> 02:01:46.960
<v Speaker 4>to shout anything up before we go.

2612
02:01:47.319 --> 02:01:47.520
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

2613
02:01:48.199 --> 02:01:51.119
<v Speaker 3>You can find me at my website Jason Alsos dot com.

2614
02:01:51.159 --> 02:01:52.520
<v Speaker 3>You can find me on YouTube. You can find me

2615
02:01:52.880 --> 02:01:54.920
<v Speaker 3>usually the fourth Hower of Alex Jones every Friday.

2616
02:01:55.319 --> 02:01:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

2617
02:01:55.560 --> 02:01:58.279
<v Speaker 3>You can find me writing Sam Hid Show, and find

2618
02:01:58.279 --> 02:01:58.800
<v Speaker 3>me on Twitter.

2619
02:01:59.119 --> 02:01:59.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2620
02:01:59.760 --> 02:02:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Uh, my name is Aden Mattis. I'm the host of

2621
02:02:01.720 --> 02:02:05.399
<v Speaker 4>the lore Lodge History Unhinged and the Weird Bible podcast.

2622
02:02:05.600 --> 02:02:07.439
<v Speaker 4>I do want to quickly say that the Anglican Church

2623
02:02:07.479 --> 02:02:09.840
<v Speaker 4>does not necessarily agree with me about freemasonry before I

2624
02:02:09.840 --> 02:02:10.680
<v Speaker 4>get in trouble for that.

2625
02:02:11.119 --> 02:02:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

2626
02:02:11.520 --> 02:02:13.920
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, that's that's where I'm leaving this. You can

2627
02:02:13.920 --> 02:02:15.439
<v Speaker 4>find me here on YouTube.

2628
02:02:15.319 --> 02:02:19.800
<v Speaker 5>Timothy Gordon on Twitter. I'm at timothee Ology t I

2629
02:02:19.920 --> 02:02:22.439
<v Speaker 5>M O T H E E O L O G Y,

2630
02:02:22.720 --> 02:02:26.439
<v Speaker 5>and I'm on YouTube as well, Timothy Gordon doing a

2631
02:02:26.479 --> 02:02:28.000
<v Speaker 5>show called Rules for Introgrades.

2632
02:02:28.640 --> 02:02:31.279
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having us on. This was fun at each other.

2633
02:02:31.439 --> 02:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, the most heated debate we've had.

2634
02:02:34.119 --> 02:02:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Who thought We're gonna be back tonight at eight pm

2635
02:02:36.439 --> 02:02:38.960
<v Speaker 2>for timcast I r L. Don't miss it, Bring your

2636
02:02:38.960 --> 02:02:41.560
<v Speaker 2>friend friends, tell your grandma. Thanks franking out. We'll see

2637
02:02:41.600 --> 02:02:41.920
<v Speaker 2>all then
