WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Nobody has perfect truth or absolute truth. So maybe it's

2
00:00:02.520 --> 00:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out there, but it doesn't exist and we don't have it.

3
00:00:04.480 --> 00:00:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Fine cast it however you want. That's still satanic and principle.

4
00:00:07.559 --> 00:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mean even the fact that Albert Pike in

5
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that sentence is saying that absolute truth is unattainable, is

6
00:00:11.720 --> 00:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>implicitly stating that Freemasonry makes no claims to have absolute truth. Okay,

7
00:00:15.400 --> 00:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is it absolutely true that absolute truth is unattainable. Let's

8
00:00:18.320 --> 00:00:20.039
<v Speaker 1>go back to pre seb one on one right, they

9
00:00:20.120 --> 00:00:22.879
<v Speaker 1>keep skirting the point that I'm making and trying to

10
00:00:22.879 --> 00:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>make this into some game, and it's not a game. Okay,

11
00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:26.879
<v Speaker 1>So this is a good Bible, and actually it's the

12
00:00:26.920 --> 00:00:28.359
<v Speaker 1>ol in the Bible and truth and then christ don't

13
00:00:28.359 --> 00:00:31.199
<v Speaker 1>have absolute true. Well you don't necessarily have to believe that.

14
00:00:31.760 --> 00:00:33.359
<v Speaker 1>You can be a Mason and disagree with Albert Pike,

15
00:00:33.399 --> 00:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you. So it's subjectivists and relativest that's my point,

16
00:00:35.600 --> 00:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's why he keeps admitting my point. Satanism. So

17
00:00:38.280 --> 00:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely it's absolutely synthesizeable, which it.

18
00:00:40.719 --> 00:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Simply does not concern itself with that. If if we were, hey,

19
00:00:45.640 --> 00:00:49.399
<v Speaker 2>religion in making these claims. I think you'd have a

20
00:00:49.399 --> 00:00:53.079
<v Speaker 2>better case. Okay, there's plenty of plenty of groups within society,

21
00:00:53.719 --> 00:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the Boy Scouts, for example, there's a bad example.

22
00:00:56.679 --> 00:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The context the contest of the context of Albert Pike.

23
00:01:01.119 --> 00:01:03.520
<v Speaker 2>There's there's tons of groups that have certain base level

24
00:01:03.560 --> 00:01:09.879
<v Speaker 2>requirements but then leave subjects that are not the purview

25
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>or the the these.

26
00:01:10.680 --> 00:01:12.519
<v Speaker 1>Alcoholic This is where they try to shift into it

27
00:01:12.519 --> 00:01:15.079
<v Speaker 1>being a civic organization like Boy Scouts, and that's not

28
00:01:15.079 --> 00:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>what it is. LIKEX Anonymous is an example, it's done

29
00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit. Well, let's see Alcoholics Anonymous as

30
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:20.519
<v Speaker 1>an example. You have to believe in a higher power

31
00:01:20.560 --> 00:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>in order to go ait A. Twelve sevens are based

32
00:01:22.319 --> 00:01:26.239
<v Speaker 1>on massonic principles. AA is Yeah, so you think that

33
00:01:26.719 --> 00:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Alcoholics Anonymous inherently denies christ or is incompatible it was

34
00:01:30.040 --> 00:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a strong man. I'm not trying to do this.

35
00:01:31.799 --> 00:01:33.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to fuck with the accusing guys. But

36
00:01:34.239 --> 00:01:36.719
<v Speaker 1>do you believe that alcohol This is not intentionally a

37
00:01:36.760 --> 00:01:38.159
<v Speaker 1>strong manter distraction. I just want to know your answer.

38
00:01:38.159 --> 00:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that Alcoholics Anonymous is incompatible with Christianity

39
00:01:40.879 --> 00:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in the same way they believe freemasonry is incapatable. It

40
00:01:43.079 --> 00:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>depends on how far Alcoholics Anonymous would try to enforce

41
00:01:45.680 --> 00:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>their principles of generic Fiism. So it really depends, uh.

42
00:01:48.879 --> 00:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And I mean there's states, there's a degree, there's just say,

43
00:01:51.040 --> 00:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a degree of which it's acceptable. Their statements are

44
00:01:54.319 --> 00:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>sufficiently vague to allow for all kinds of possible things,

45
00:01:57.680 --> 00:01:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So that would really depend upon the specifics. But alb

46
00:02:00.040 --> 00:02:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Pike is argument also, it's not a religious initiation with oaths, right.

47
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:07.159
<v Speaker 3>Alcohol, it's like therapy, right.

48
00:02:07.480 --> 00:02:11.159
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure by the even though AA has

49
00:02:11.400 --> 00:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>some elements of Masonry as part of it, I'm not

50
00:02:13.919 --> 00:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>sure that it's equivalent to the Masonic initiation and brotherhood.

51
00:02:18.400 --> 00:02:19.599
<v Speaker 3>That's why I keep having distressed.

52
00:02:19.599 --> 00:02:22.039
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's agreed. Yeah, it's kind of comparing

53
00:02:22.080 --> 00:02:25.759
<v Speaker 4>apple storages. It's we're talking about.

54
00:02:24.919 --> 00:02:32.199
<v Speaker 5>It, you know, a secret society with levels of oats

55
00:02:32.319 --> 00:02:34.039
<v Speaker 5>initiation that.

56
00:02:34.560 --> 00:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>And religious initiation. That's where this ends up going.

57
00:02:37.879 --> 00:02:41.879
<v Speaker 5>And inherently deceptive oats and initiation that compound on each

58
00:02:41.879 --> 00:02:44.840
<v Speaker 5>other and compile on each other with alts of initiation

59
00:02:45.039 --> 00:02:50.159
<v Speaker 5>that also contradict Christian dogs exactly, Alcoholics anonymous, just like, oh,

60
00:02:50.159 --> 00:02:52.520
<v Speaker 5>you've got to believe in a higher power, and then

61
00:02:52.599 --> 00:02:54.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, we sit around me, do a group there if.

62
00:02:54.280 --> 00:02:57.240
<v Speaker 4>You think or whatever, it's it's very, very different from them.

63
00:02:57.319 --> 00:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that's the same point I make with saying

64
00:02:59.080 --> 00:03:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the pledge of allegiance later. So yeah, context of God,

65
00:03:02.319 --> 00:03:05.759
<v Speaker 1>this whole chapter is about theology, not philosophy. Theology. So

66
00:03:05.800 --> 00:03:08.479
<v Speaker 1>he's saying that in terms of theology, perfect truth, truth

67
00:03:08.560 --> 00:03:11.039
<v Speaker 1>is not attainable anywhere. Do you believe that perfect truth

68
00:03:11.120 --> 00:03:13.719
<v Speaker 1>is not attainable anywhere? Well, I believe that Jesus Christ

69
00:03:13.719 --> 00:03:14.759
<v Speaker 1>is the Way, the Truth, and the Light. But I

70
00:03:14.800 --> 00:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that in our current state we're able to

71
00:03:17.120 --> 00:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have like an omniscient understanding of absolute truth. I think

72
00:03:21.120 --> 00:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>there's all sorts of things happening in the universe.

73
00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:22.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

74
00:03:22.879 --> 00:03:23.879
<v Speaker 1>There's what you know, there's what you don't know, and

75
00:03:23.919 --> 00:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>there's what you don't know that you don't know. I

76
00:03:25.039 --> 00:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>don't claim just because I'm a Christian to have attained

77
00:03:26.960 --> 00:03:29.199
<v Speaker 1>absolute truth. I believe that I've attained absolute truth in

78
00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the sense that I know who got it.

79
00:03:31.479 --> 00:03:34.159
<v Speaker 3>So say that again the way the truth of the life.

80
00:03:34.159 --> 00:03:35.719
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think you can actually know that or

81
00:03:35.719 --> 00:03:37.319
<v Speaker 3>have any Yeah, that's what that's all.

82
00:03:38.400 --> 00:03:40.919
<v Speaker 4>I think it's actually dogmatic. It's dogmatic to.

83
00:03:40.879 --> 00:03:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Me that you can't have certainty that Christ is exactly.

84
00:03:44.840 --> 00:03:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's where this argument keeps going, Right, It's like

85
00:03:47.960 --> 00:03:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't understand that it's a contradiction to say that, Oh,

86
00:03:50.759 --> 00:03:53.319
<v Speaker 1>for me personally, Jesus is the absolute way the truth

87
00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:55.439
<v Speaker 1>in life. But nobody has absolute way the truth in

88
00:03:55.439 --> 00:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the life. It is silly, is And I believe that

89
00:03:57.479 --> 00:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ is the son of God Christ.

90
00:04:00.719 --> 00:04:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Too, that's the argument, right.

91
00:04:02.560 --> 00:04:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Christianity's claims are antithetical to the syncretous subjectivist, relativist claims

92
00:04:07.879 --> 00:04:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of Masonry.

93
00:04:08.360 --> 00:04:09.240
<v Speaker 3>That's the whole point here.

94
00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:12.319
<v Speaker 1>So in the sense that would you call I mean,

95
00:04:12.360 --> 00:04:14.639
<v Speaker 1>would you call that absolute truth? Because when I hear

96
00:04:14.680 --> 00:04:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the word absolute truth, I mean all true I think

97
00:04:16.680 --> 00:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of all truth. So there's nothing in the word absolute

98
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>truths or objective truth that necessitates omniscience. And so I

99
00:04:21.279 --> 00:04:22.959
<v Speaker 1>think that already asked you with the irony here is

100
00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that it's the Mason. Yes, I you want to play

101
00:04:24.800 --> 00:04:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the word game. Why, I'm not trying to mess with you.

102
00:04:26.920 --> 00:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe in absolute truth. I am an objectivist, I

103
00:04:29.639 --> 00:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>am not a subjectivist. Okay, just so answer your question.

104
00:04:32.000 --> 00:04:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Mark.

105
00:04:32.199 --> 00:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Now he's contradicted again because Albert Pike says that that's unattainable. Rightly.

106
00:04:36.680 --> 00:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So the whole point of this was to say that

107
00:04:38.680 --> 00:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the teachings of Satanism are that you are your own God,

108
00:04:41.319 --> 00:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which is what Satan says in the Garden to how

109
00:04:42.920 --> 00:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of a need you determine reality? You determine what's true

110
00:04:45.639 --> 00:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and what's false. And the original presentation that you guys

111
00:04:47.720 --> 00:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>gave as to why masonry is so awesome is because

112
00:04:49.319 --> 00:04:51.439
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have apostles, it doesn't authorities, it doesn't have dogmas.

113
00:04:51.480 --> 00:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>It's simply a philosophy and you can kind of craft

114
00:04:53.279 --> 00:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>it as you want with it from within it. But

115
00:04:54.839 --> 00:04:56.439
<v Speaker 1>then we saw that no, there's actually a lot of requirements,

116
00:04:56.480 --> 00:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dogmas, a lot of qualifications, and they

117
00:04:58.519 --> 00:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>teach a subjectivist relativist idea at the same time as

118
00:05:00.839 --> 00:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>contradicting it with the idea that there are dogmas and authorities.

119
00:05:03.720 --> 00:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>That was the argument. I don't believe that freemasonry teaches

120
00:05:06.600 --> 00:05:10.319
<v Speaker 1>a subjectivist, relativist philosophy. Okay, just because just because Albert

121
00:05:10.319 --> 00:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Pike says that absolute truth is unattainable does not mean

122
00:05:12.639 --> 00:05:14.879
<v Speaker 1>that absolute truth does not exist. I am an objectivist.

123
00:05:14.879 --> 00:05:18.079
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's just his opinion. Okay, who does it

124
00:05:18.199 --> 00:05:21.439
<v Speaker 1>matter in masonry in terms of who said it? Because

125
00:05:21.439 --> 00:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>there were authorities apparently, so who determines the regular and

126
00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the irregular lodges?

127
00:05:25.560 --> 00:05:28.040
<v Speaker 2>So you can go back to that with these ideas

128
00:05:28.040 --> 00:05:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of the landmarks, each lodge, each grand lodge is the

129
00:05:31.040 --> 00:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>supreme authority in that jurisdiction. It will recognize or unrecognize.

130
00:05:35.199 --> 00:05:36.759
<v Speaker 3>Hey, you're right, FDA.

131
00:05:36.839 --> 00:05:39.519
<v Speaker 1>This is the exact same and trust in this exact

132
00:05:39.519 --> 00:05:43.519
<v Speaker 1>same debate with every Protestant about normative authority. Yeah, my

133
00:05:43.600 --> 00:05:47.959
<v Speaker 1>local pastor has a normative authority, but nobody tells me

134
00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and can buy my conscience and just tells me what what.

135
00:05:51.879 --> 00:05:54.319
<v Speaker 3>It's just like little tree.

136
00:05:54.360 --> 00:05:57.439
<v Speaker 5>Masonry is just a decentralized groups.

137
00:05:57.279 --> 00:05:59.639
<v Speaker 4>It's a decentralized.

138
00:05:58.800 --> 00:06:02.240
<v Speaker 5>Grouping of the visual pulps who get to decide what

139
00:06:02.439 --> 00:06:03.079
<v Speaker 5>the dogmas are.

140
00:06:03.120 --> 00:06:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Freemason we are, but also that's not dogmatic.

141
00:06:05.839 --> 00:06:07.959
<v Speaker 3>That's also not dogmatic, but it is.

142
00:06:07.639 --> 00:06:10.759
<v Speaker 5>But that's also dogmatic. It's all over the place. Is

143
00:06:10.800 --> 00:06:13.319
<v Speaker 5>a horrible this is really sad. I don't think they've

144
00:06:13.360 --> 00:06:16.720
<v Speaker 5>really it doesn't seem like they've watched like any of

145
00:06:16.759 --> 00:06:17.600
<v Speaker 5>your previous.

146
00:06:17.279 --> 00:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they've thought about this. No, they haven't

147
00:06:19.319 --> 00:06:22.399
<v Speaker 1>thought about this at a debate level. Chase, what's up man?

148
00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Hey, it was kind of funny listening to this last

149
00:06:27.839 --> 00:06:30.120
<v Speaker 5>last section of the debate, how much it reminds me

150
00:06:30.199 --> 00:06:34.120
<v Speaker 5>of obviously like the Protestants, like like that girl Tristan

151
00:06:34.199 --> 00:06:38.839
<v Speaker 5>was saying, but also it reminds me of the Ecumenists.

152
00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:42.959
<v Speaker 4>It reminds me of the Ecumenists that attack anyone.

153
00:06:42.720 --> 00:06:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Who says, you know, Orthodoxy is the truth, you know,

154
00:06:45.759 --> 00:06:49.519
<v Speaker 5>like goofy, goofy, effeminine people like Ethan Wayne.

155
00:06:49.199 --> 00:06:52.199
<v Speaker 4>And stuff like that. They have the same exact line

156
00:06:52.199 --> 00:06:53.040
<v Speaker 4>of thinking.

157
00:06:53.040 --> 00:06:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, Ethan Wayne is a Freemason. He shares Masonic stuff

158
00:06:56.199 --> 00:06:59.439
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Oh he does, Yeah, he shares, so

159
00:06:59.560 --> 00:07:01.319
<v Speaker 1>he shares, he shares Masonic stuff.

160
00:07:01.879 --> 00:07:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's just it's just funny.

161
00:07:03.319 --> 00:07:06.079
<v Speaker 5>It's not a very deep analysis, but it's the same

162
00:07:06.199 --> 00:07:11.519
<v Speaker 5>exact mentality as the Ecumenists trying to subvert Orthodoxy from within.

163
00:07:11.600 --> 00:07:15.040
<v Speaker 5>Whether they're a Freemason or not, it's still the same mentality.

164
00:07:15.079 --> 00:07:17.000
<v Speaker 4>And then when you ask them. I don't know if

165
00:07:17.120 --> 00:07:19.680
<v Speaker 4>later in the debate do you get into like, hey,

166
00:07:19.720 --> 00:07:21.040
<v Speaker 4>how do you know that.

167
00:07:22.519 --> 00:07:25.360
<v Speaker 5>These other people are predicating the one the same god

168
00:07:25.399 --> 00:07:26.199
<v Speaker 5>as you do?

169
00:07:26.279 --> 00:07:28.600
<v Speaker 4>They do they ever give? No?

170
00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:29.040
<v Speaker 3>We do?

171
00:07:29.160 --> 00:07:29.360
<v Speaker 6>We do?

172
00:07:29.959 --> 00:07:30.199
<v Speaker 3>We do.

173
00:07:30.319 --> 00:07:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Come back to this point of me trying to illustrate

174
00:07:34.680 --> 00:07:39.319
<v Speaker 1>that they actually have all of these criteria that exclude people,

175
00:07:39.959 --> 00:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>which means that they've moved the goalpost and it's not

176
00:07:42.680 --> 00:07:44.199
<v Speaker 1>just a higher power.

177
00:07:44.480 --> 00:07:45.800
<v Speaker 3>So yes, it does come back to.

178
00:07:45.759 --> 00:07:49.839
<v Speaker 1>That another brand lodge. So there are authorities and there

179
00:07:49.839 --> 00:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>are things that will give you unrecognized were So you know, well,

180
00:07:53.720 --> 00:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that you don't like me going back to

181
00:07:55.040 --> 00:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it when you're referring to the same fallacious argument from before,

182
00:07:57.120 --> 00:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go back. Yeah.

183
00:07:58.279 --> 00:08:00.519
<v Speaker 2>I don't see how anything I've SAIDs in Kong that

184
00:08:00.600 --> 00:08:04.279
<v Speaker 2>there is a Mason authorities, there is a structure that

185
00:08:04.399 --> 00:08:07.600
<v Speaker 2>governs a governance structure of the fraternity. That is completely

186
00:08:07.639 --> 00:08:09.639
<v Speaker 2>different than saying that one man Albert Pike or I

187
00:08:09.639 --> 00:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't make that organize an author I didn't make the

188
00:08:11.199 --> 00:08:12.879
<v Speaker 2>argument liary when that was that they aren't authorities. And

189
00:08:12.920 --> 00:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>then you try to put words in my mouth and

190
00:08:14.079 --> 00:08:15.439
<v Speaker 2>say that I saw it. I didn't learn to straw man.

191
00:08:15.439 --> 00:08:17.199
<v Speaker 2>I didn't much worse say that there are no authorities.

192
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Silence argued in your opening statement, there's no authorities in

193
00:08:20.439 --> 00:08:23.839
<v Speaker 2>the context, I specifically pointed out those books and those authors,

194
00:08:23.920 --> 00:08:25.839
<v Speaker 2>and I said that one man does not speak for masonry.

195
00:08:25.879 --> 00:08:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there not so like not one man. It is

196
00:08:27.879 --> 00:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a government structure of freemay doawnery. So you're appredicating and changing.

197
00:08:31.399 --> 00:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>You're moving the goalpost from the opening statement saying authorities,

198
00:08:34.000 --> 00:08:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and you're saying that, oh, I just know one dude

199
00:08:35.759 --> 00:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>as an in the opening statement, he said there is

200
00:08:37.399 --> 00:08:39.279
<v Speaker 1>no one man who speaks for masonry. But he also

201
00:08:39.320 --> 00:08:43.039
<v Speaker 1>said there's no apostles and authorities. So in no context, okay, fine,

202
00:08:43.080 --> 00:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>so there are there is an authority that is a

203
00:08:45.440 --> 00:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>body correct.

204
00:08:46.320 --> 00:08:49.120
<v Speaker 5>On behalf of freemasonry. She says that no man speaks

205
00:08:49.159 --> 00:08:50.200
<v Speaker 5>on behalf of free basonry.

206
00:08:50.240 --> 00:08:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, no one speaks on freemasonry. And I speak

207
00:08:53.799 --> 00:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>for freemasonry. From Albert Pike speaking for freemasonry.

208
00:08:59.159 --> 00:09:04.559
<v Speaker 5>Of freemasonry, I can with the full confidence say.

209
00:09:02.039 --> 00:09:05.639
<v Speaker 3>That exactly that's the whole de bit rare.

210
00:09:06.240 --> 00:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>There's a government structure for other horror.

211
00:09:11.440 --> 00:09:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah what get it gets crazy.

212
00:09:13.039 --> 00:09:17.159
<v Speaker 1>We haven't even gotten heated yet. Uh, we are approaching

213
00:09:17.279 --> 00:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the first half. We're not even got we haven't even

214
00:09:19.600 --> 00:09:21.639
<v Speaker 1>gotten heated yet. Authorities, and you do have authorities that

215
00:09:21.639 --> 00:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you submit to and you can be removed.

216
00:09:23.440 --> 00:09:26.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it hasn't gotten past that one all yet.

217
00:09:26.200 --> 00:09:28.279
<v Speaker 1>It takes the first hour to get past this point

218
00:09:28.600 --> 00:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>from the lodge, right, yeah, okay, So why did you

219
00:09:30.480 --> 00:09:32.039
<v Speaker 1>cast it as if it's a free thinking of sort

220
00:09:32.039 --> 00:09:34.799
<v Speaker 1>of organization with no dogmas. I didn't cast it at that.

221
00:09:35.120 --> 00:09:36.879
<v Speaker 2>I started my opening statement by saying that you were

222
00:09:36.879 --> 00:09:40.039
<v Speaker 2>going to be bring quotes from individuals and try which

223
00:09:40.039 --> 00:09:41.519
<v Speaker 2>you did do. When you pointed out that the name

224
00:09:41.519 --> 00:09:43.759
<v Speaker 2>was Molesen dogma, you attempted to make the argument that

225
00:09:43.799 --> 00:09:44.519
<v Speaker 2>this is massa.

226
00:09:44.600 --> 00:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I didn't. No, you missed the argument. You're still

227
00:09:46.960 --> 00:09:49.399
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally misunderstand and I and then when I corrected you

228
00:09:49.440 --> 00:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that this that the words of alur Pike are not

229
00:09:51.559 --> 00:09:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Masonic dogma, we went in this circular argument. It wasn't

230
00:09:54.159 --> 00:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>an all regular argument. It was a contradiction logically to

231
00:09:56.240 --> 00:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>say that there are dogmas, that there's there's a dogma,

232
00:09:58.120 --> 00:09:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that there's no dogmas there, I wouldn't make it, AUGI

233
00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that was the name of dogma, that there's no dogmas.

234
00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>There's just no there. There's there's just few dogmas. Like

235
00:10:04.519 --> 00:10:06.519
<v Speaker 1>if so there are dogmas, Yes, if you would consider

236
00:10:06.639 --> 00:10:08.639
<v Speaker 1>then the real requirement, if you would consider the requirement.

237
00:10:08.679 --> 00:10:09.519
<v Speaker 3>So now he's mood.

238
00:10:09.559 --> 00:10:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Now he's admitted dogmas plural. Notice member Chase said at

239
00:10:13.039 --> 00:10:15.519
<v Speaker 1>the beginning there's no dogmas. Then it's okay, there's one dogma.

240
00:10:15.600 --> 00:10:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Now he said dogmas plural that you have to believe

241
00:10:19.159 --> 00:10:20.799
<v Speaker 1>in God in order to be a freemason. A dogma.

242
00:10:20.879 --> 00:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Then by that definition, there is a dogma. Did you

243
00:10:23.320 --> 00:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>not just then qualify that I can be a Satanist

244
00:10:25.240 --> 00:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and be a Mason. So there's now other qualifications that

245
00:10:27.240 --> 00:10:29.039
<v Speaker 1>would exclude me. So there's more to the dogmas. That's

246
00:10:29.080 --> 00:10:30.759
<v Speaker 1>why you guys are being dishonest. Well, isn't. Now is

247
00:10:30.799 --> 00:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a definition of dogma different for you guys. That's why

248
00:10:32.720 --> 00:10:34.039
<v Speaker 1>I was asking what it is for the auction, not

249
00:10:34.200 --> 00:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the thing that gets you excluded from the group.

250
00:10:35.480 --> 00:10:35.720
<v Speaker 3>How's that?

251
00:10:36.200 --> 00:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here's dogmas, thank you. So they claimed, but the

252
00:10:38.720 --> 00:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>idea that there's not dogmas is not true. I thank you.

253
00:10:40.720 --> 00:10:42.759
<v Speaker 2>That wasn't the point that was made. The point was

254
00:10:42.759 --> 00:10:44.960
<v Speaker 2>that the words of Albert pikern On Masonic dogma. Yeah,

255
00:10:44.960 --> 00:10:46.720
<v Speaker 2>that's a straw man, dude. I didn't argue that his

256
00:10:46.840 --> 00:10:48.799
<v Speaker 2>words are dogma. I said that it's funny that he

257
00:10:48.840 --> 00:10:50.440
<v Speaker 2>titled his book Morals and Dogma, And I said, the

258
00:10:50.480 --> 00:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>contradiction is the argument that the dogma is there's no dogma.

259
00:10:53.879 --> 00:10:56.279
<v Speaker 1>How is it how is it compatible to claim that

260
00:10:56.320 --> 00:10:58.919
<v Speaker 1>there are dogmas, which I'm not even disputing, but then

261
00:10:59.080 --> 00:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously claimed that the organization advocates for subjectivism and relativism.

262
00:11:02.159 --> 00:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there's absolute dogmas, then it's inherently not

263
00:11:04.120 --> 00:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>subjectivist or relativist exactly. That's the point, Chase. It's a contradiction.

264
00:11:08.080 --> 00:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm arguing, you guys contradict yourself. That's what you do

265
00:11:10.159 --> 00:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in today. It's as you point out logical contradictions. Okay,

266
00:11:12.200 --> 00:11:14.639
<v Speaker 1>And do you tie it directly to how any of

267
00:11:14.679 --> 00:11:16.279
<v Speaker 1>what we've been talking about for the last twenty minutes

268
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:20.159
<v Speaker 1>or so makes Freemasonry incompatible with Christianity? Well, which is

269
00:11:20.200 --> 00:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the fine amount quessition, but can't affirm any kind of

270
00:11:22.360 --> 00:11:26.639
<v Speaker 1>subjectivism and moral relativism. In terms of even theological authorities.

271
00:11:26.639 --> 00:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You have to believe there's some kind of theological authorities,

272
00:11:28.679 --> 00:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>which I do and chase us. Yeah, in the theological authorities,

273
00:11:32.000 --> 00:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy christ.

274
00:11:33.039 --> 00:11:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, are my dogma when it comes to my religion

275
00:11:37.480 --> 00:11:38.279
<v Speaker 2>is Christianity.

276
00:11:38.360 --> 00:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not Freemadi. Now we get prot slap. This just

277
00:11:41.519 --> 00:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>turns into total slough here, I forgot this part. Okay,

278
00:11:44.440 --> 00:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So what Christianity me? Firstly, you're showing them.

279
00:11:49.240 --> 00:11:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Also that like your justification for Protestantism is the same

280
00:11:53.440 --> 00:11:58.799
<v Speaker 5>as justification for authority within freemasonry, which also affirms moral relativism.

281
00:11:59.120 --> 00:12:01.679
<v Speaker 5>Now do to use myself of my own conscience. I

282
00:12:01.759 --> 00:12:03.440
<v Speaker 5>read my Bible, and I figure out to code my

283
00:12:03.519 --> 00:12:05.639
<v Speaker 5>Bible and put on the Bible the colder hat, and

284
00:12:05.759 --> 00:12:06.360
<v Speaker 5>I and I.

285
00:12:06.480 --> 00:12:07.360
<v Speaker 4>Just and I do it.

286
00:12:07.679 --> 00:12:09.440
<v Speaker 3>You put I talk to God.

287
00:12:09.480 --> 00:12:11.639
<v Speaker 4>I read the word of God. The Word of God

288
00:12:11.679 --> 00:12:12.320
<v Speaker 4>flows through me.

289
00:12:12.399 --> 00:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>It's like you pull out your you pull out.

290
00:12:14.679 --> 00:12:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Is that where it goes for the next hour? Now?

291
00:12:16.480 --> 00:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, DJ's about to end this part pretty soon.

292
00:12:20.240 --> 00:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, you pull out your Joseph Smith peepstone, and

293
00:12:23.399 --> 00:12:25.799
<v Speaker 1>then you read the Bible text through the peep stone.

294
00:12:26.320 --> 00:12:27.559
<v Speaker 3>And that's how you interpret it.

295
00:12:28.200 --> 00:12:30.480
<v Speaker 5>You read the Bible text through the peep stone, but

296
00:12:30.639 --> 00:12:33.840
<v Speaker 5>also you're a Freemason, so you're also you're reading uh

297
00:12:34.440 --> 00:12:36.559
<v Speaker 5>your peepee stone and your Yoni stone.

298
00:12:36.600 --> 00:12:37.559
<v Speaker 3>You're correct, your.

299
00:12:37.600 --> 00:12:40.919
<v Speaker 4>You'r Shiva Lingham and your and your Shivay.

300
00:12:43.360 --> 00:12:47.159
<v Speaker 2>Loosely Protestant. I'd rather not like that's my congregation here,

301
00:12:47.240 --> 00:12:47.519
<v Speaker 2>would you?

302
00:12:47.919 --> 00:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay? Here's w's my family? Too much? Historic? Your protest Historically?

303
00:12:51.360 --> 00:12:55.039
<v Speaker 1>Are there bodies of people that can determine what's normative

304
00:12:55.039 --> 00:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>to be a Christian and not not be a Christian?

305
00:12:56.600 --> 00:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean by can? There certainly are that

306
00:12:58.120 --> 00:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>have But what do you mean by can? Do you

307
00:13:00.360 --> 00:13:03.279
<v Speaker 1>believe that anybody has the normative authority to declare in

308
00:13:03.360 --> 00:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>church history at any point where, whenever or never, that

309
00:13:06.080 --> 00:13:08.159
<v Speaker 1>there are these people that count as Christians and these

310
00:13:08.200 --> 00:13:10.039
<v Speaker 1>people that don't, because it seems absurd to me, because

311
00:13:10.080 --> 00:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys accept this authority amongst the Masons. But I'm

312
00:13:12.879 --> 00:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna bet that historically you don't accept that there's any

313
00:13:15.320 --> 00:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>historical group that has that authority. I would say that

314
00:13:17.720 --> 00:13:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ has that authority solely historically. Chase after Jesus

315
00:13:20.879 --> 00:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and is of the Church. Do I believe that anybody

316
00:13:23.720 --> 00:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>has the authority to speak for God or the theology

317
00:13:25.320 --> 00:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of what's true or not true? Does anybody in church

318
00:13:27.559 --> 00:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>history have the normous authority to declare who is and

319
00:13:30.279 --> 00:13:32.279
<v Speaker 1>is not a part of this? You mean actually legitimately

320
00:13:32.320 --> 00:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>have the authority or those who have exercised that authority,

321
00:13:35.519 --> 00:13:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Because yes, I could look at the Nice Council, I

322
00:13:37.039 --> 00:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>coul say, all right, they authority that they established this.

323
00:13:39.039 --> 00:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that they have the Norman authority to

324
00:13:41.080 --> 00:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>do that? You think they certain? Now, I don't really

325
00:13:43.240 --> 00:13:45.039
<v Speaker 1>think that anybody has perfectly been able to speak for

326
00:13:45.080 --> 00:13:47.519
<v Speaker 1>God since Jesus Christ. Okay, so notice that this is

327
00:13:47.559 --> 00:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>all back to prat slop subjectivism exactly like FDA interest

328
00:13:51.720 --> 00:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and said it would go. Do you agree or do

329
00:13:53.120 --> 00:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a different system?

330
00:13:53.840 --> 00:13:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

331
00:13:54.039 --> 00:13:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Loosely with that? Yeah. By the way, do do you

332
00:13:55.639 --> 00:13:58.039
<v Speaker 1>accept the canon of Scripture? Now? The Canon of Scripture?

333
00:13:58.120 --> 00:13:58.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

334
00:13:58.759 --> 00:14:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, sixty six book. Probably I don't know. I don't

335
00:14:01.919 --> 00:14:03.759
<v Speaker 1>know that it's relevant. I don't know that it's relevant,

336
00:14:04.480 --> 00:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's not relevant. Probably I don't. I mean, I'm

337
00:14:07.080 --> 00:14:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a Christian, but probably I don't know.

338
00:14:10.960 --> 00:14:14.519
<v Speaker 5>Doors open that you could, Yeah, that's funny.

339
00:14:15.120 --> 00:14:16.840
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of different ways this could have gone

340
00:14:16.879 --> 00:14:19.000
<v Speaker 4>from here. Curious where they go with it.

341
00:14:19.240 --> 00:14:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Who decides what books Bible? I'm asking you is the art?

342
00:14:23.200 --> 00:14:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Because the fundamental question of the debate is whether or

343
00:14:25.679 --> 00:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not freemasonry is compatible with Christianity. I want to know

344
00:14:28.120 --> 00:14:30.279
<v Speaker 1>why it's not which branch of christian I want to

345
00:14:30.320 --> 00:14:31.919
<v Speaker 1>know what you think Christianity is that's relevant. Well, I

346
00:14:31.960 --> 00:14:33.679
<v Speaker 1>think Christianity is believe that Jesus Christ is the son

347
00:14:33.720 --> 00:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of God. That's why. Is it not a fair question

348
00:14:35.639 --> 00:14:37.919
<v Speaker 1>to ask if you believe in church history that anybody

349
00:14:37.919 --> 00:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>has the authorities? I be sitting here as a Muslim

350
00:14:40.000 --> 00:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and having the same debate and making the same points.

351
00:14:41.919 --> 00:14:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Irrelevant what my faith is serving my point? No, it's

352
00:14:44.600 --> 00:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant what my faith is. How is it irrelevant to

353
00:14:46.879 --> 00:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the question of whether or not Christianity is compatible with freemason.

354
00:14:49.320 --> 00:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>You could have two atheists having the same debate where

355
00:14:51.080 --> 00:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>once said Christianity is compatible with free meal to read

356
00:14:53.159 --> 00:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>another apea says it's not because you claim to be

357
00:14:55.480 --> 00:14:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Christian and representing a form of Christianity that's compatible. I

358
00:14:58.000 --> 00:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>want to know what you think Christianity is real quick,

359
00:15:00.360 --> 00:15:02.399
<v Speaker 1>really on just so I don't think this is actually

360
00:15:02.399 --> 00:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>swaying from the prompts, because it's it's actually really important

361
00:15:05.240 --> 00:15:07.759
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you accept authority historically in the church

362
00:15:07.840 --> 00:15:09.639
<v Speaker 1>or not. Because let's just say, for example, that you

363
00:15:09.759 --> 00:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>accept that the you know, the the emotional call they're

364
00:15:14.320 --> 00:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>putting together of the books in you know, whatever council

365
00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:17.919
<v Speaker 1>that was. I can't think about this at right time

366
00:15:17.960 --> 00:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, But nonetheless, there have been other declarations in

367
00:15:21.000 --> 00:15:23.519
<v Speaker 1>the Church that freemasonry is to be condemned and you'll

368
00:15:23.519 --> 00:15:25.759
<v Speaker 1>be excommunicated. So if you were to, you know, submit

369
00:15:25.799 --> 00:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to authority in that sense, that'd be a direct contradiction

370
00:15:28.120 --> 00:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to so freemasonry at the time. Now, I don't want,

371
00:15:30.960 --> 00:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure make your point for you. I'm just trying

372
00:15:32.320 --> 00:15:34.159
<v Speaker 1>to demonstrate that I think it actually ties into the

373
00:15:34.159 --> 00:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>debate prompt I'm making the argument again, let me make

374
00:15:36.759 --> 00:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it very clear. I'm making the argument that it's ironic

375
00:15:39.200 --> 00:15:43.519
<v Speaker 1>that these individuals will accept a decentralized authority about who's

376
00:15:43.519 --> 00:15:45.039
<v Speaker 1>in and out of masonry, but when we ask them

377
00:15:45.080 --> 00:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>about Christianity, there's no actual authority or normtive authority within

378
00:15:48.279 --> 00:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>churches or to do anything like that. I think that's

379
00:15:49.879 --> 00:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>just absurd.

380
00:15:50.360 --> 00:15:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, equating freemasonry with a religion as such as Christianity

381
00:15:54.000 --> 00:15:55.919
<v Speaker 2>is absurd. That's the point that we're trying to make,

382
00:15:56.480 --> 00:15:58.240
<v Speaker 2>and it a lot of lend. My christian beliefs aren't important,

383
00:15:58.240 --> 00:15:59.559
<v Speaker 2>But we're not here to debate.

384
00:15:59.320 --> 00:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>What you says is christian was if you said in

385
00:16:01.360 --> 00:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>your opening savement you said Christianity is above your tie

386
00:16:03.600 --> 00:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to the lodge, what we're tied? No, I said you did?

387
00:16:06.759 --> 00:16:10.039
<v Speaker 1>You said that themersonally? You submit, You said that christ

388
00:16:10.080 --> 00:16:12.159
<v Speaker 1>is above the duty to the brothers, of the duty

389
00:16:12.159 --> 00:16:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of a mason to his own faith. Well not, my

390
00:16:14.879 --> 00:16:17.559
<v Speaker 1>My duty is to Christ over the duty to the lodge. Right,

391
00:16:18.159 --> 00:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that's my point exactly. Or you see you personally as them,

392
00:16:20.440 --> 00:16:22.039
<v Speaker 1>or more broadly, as like all people.

393
00:16:22.240 --> 00:16:24.039
<v Speaker 2>Just like any other. I'm a member of the National

394
00:16:24.039 --> 00:16:26.399
<v Speaker 2>City Club. It's say private clause down talent vallsee quations. No,

395
00:16:26.519 --> 00:16:27.120
<v Speaker 2>to equate that.

396
00:16:27.080 --> 00:16:29.039
<v Speaker 1>To freemasonry is a totally totally fault to take your

397
00:16:29.039 --> 00:16:31.879
<v Speaker 1>pick of any group. You know, those groups don't require

398
00:16:31.919 --> 00:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a belief in generic monotheism. And well, I think yasol

399
00:16:34.000 --> 00:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>ex Anonymous is a good example. I mean, this is

400
00:16:35.480 --> 00:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>an organization that requires a belief in the Supreme Being

401
00:16:37.519 --> 00:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to go through the twelve steps. It's part

402
00:16:39.000 --> 00:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the twelve steps. And if you're not, your organization

403
00:16:41.080 --> 00:16:43.519
<v Speaker 1>is not just requiring belief in a generic theism as

404
00:16:43.559 --> 00:16:46.159
<v Speaker 1>we've seen. As we actually suss that out, there's all

405
00:16:46.200 --> 00:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of these other things that come into play, which is

406
00:16:48.360 --> 00:16:50.519
<v Speaker 1>and I'm arguing that the rest of the ethos of

407
00:16:50.559 --> 00:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that system and the teachings that you guys have is

408
00:16:52.320 --> 00:16:54.559
<v Speaker 1>empathetical to Christianity. First of all, there is no such

409
00:16:54.559 --> 00:16:56.519
<v Speaker 1>thing as generic theorism, and I'm illustrating that with the

410
00:16:56.759 --> 00:17:00.039
<v Speaker 1>Satanic point. Yeah, and we sure Freemasonry doesn't add in

411
00:17:00.279 --> 00:17:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the generic theism is true. It just accepts people of

412
00:17:02.799 --> 00:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>all face if they believe in it. It never makes

413
00:17:04.160 --> 00:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a claim that this is even more absurd. So now

414
00:17:08.319 --> 00:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Being, the Higher Being, doesn't even have to

415
00:17:10.680 --> 00:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>be real. You just have to affirm the proposition that

416
00:17:13.400 --> 00:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>there's hire supreme Being. All faiths are equal, if we're

417
00:17:16.960 --> 00:17:19.559
<v Speaker 1>all it's all the same God. Okay, So how do

418
00:17:19.680 --> 00:17:23.319
<v Speaker 1>you reconcile the potent? Could I, for example, be a

419
00:17:23.359 --> 00:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>member of the Communist Party because they don't make any

420
00:17:26.519 --> 00:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>claims about anything. So let's say that there's a bunch

421
00:17:28.400 --> 00:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>of Marxist Communists and I say I'm a Christian Marxist.

422
00:17:30.440 --> 00:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that does that make sense? I'm not following you. Sorry,

423
00:17:34.200 --> 00:17:36.079
<v Speaker 1>He's asking if it's possibly a Christian ana marx Is

424
00:17:36.119 --> 00:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it antithetical to be a Christian and a member of

425
00:17:37.640 --> 00:17:40.519
<v Speaker 1>the Marxist party? I would say, so, okay, problem is

426
00:17:40.599 --> 00:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it is it antithetical to be a member of a

427
00:17:42.480 --> 00:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Gnostic sect and to be I'm sure there are examples

428
00:17:45.200 --> 00:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of people that felt that they were Marxists and Christian.

429
00:17:47.160 --> 00:17:48.839
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I might But my ask is it

430
00:17:48.839 --> 00:17:53.759
<v Speaker 1>theologically compatible? At no oralism? I would say, no, okay,

431
00:17:54.119 --> 00:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is it theologically sensible to be a Christian and a Gnostic?

432
00:17:57.960 --> 00:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I think I might change my position.

433
00:17:59.920 --> 00:18:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a communist by any means. I hate communism,

434
00:18:02.039 --> 00:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think you could be a Christian and a

435
00:18:03.200 --> 00:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Communist because I think that we all we all miss

436
00:18:05.680 --> 00:18:06.079
<v Speaker 1>the mark.

437
00:18:06.960 --> 00:18:09.640
<v Speaker 3>What does that have to do with whether it's theologically compatible?

438
00:18:09.680 --> 00:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, every time it comes back to the

439
00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>actual question, it hinges on their subjective feelings, not the

440
00:18:17.000 --> 00:18:18.559
<v Speaker 1>actual objective argumentation.

441
00:18:19.599 --> 00:18:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Tristan do you want to say something.

442
00:18:21.400 --> 00:18:24.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, it's just it's ridiculous because the whole debate.

443
00:18:25.039 --> 00:18:26.759
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I guess you knew this going in because

444
00:18:26.759 --> 00:18:28.839
<v Speaker 4>of the debate prompt you were just like, okay, this

445
00:18:28.880 --> 00:18:30.400
<v Speaker 4>is this is kind of a.

446
00:18:30.359 --> 00:18:35.480
<v Speaker 5>Softball because well, the debate is about whether freemasonry is

447
00:18:35.519 --> 00:18:40.200
<v Speaker 5>compatible with Christianity. From for most Protestants, they can't even

448
00:18:40.240 --> 00:18:42.599
<v Speaker 5>define who's a Christian, what's a Christian?

449
00:18:42.720 --> 00:18:45.079
<v Speaker 4>There are no there are no.

450
00:18:45.000 --> 00:18:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Boundaries, there's no landmarks. They talk about.

451
00:18:47.279 --> 00:18:50.839
<v Speaker 5>Landmarkies to the body of Christ. It's just it's kind

452
00:18:50.839 --> 00:18:52.039
<v Speaker 5>of up to them to decide.

453
00:18:52.200 --> 00:18:56.440
<v Speaker 4>So it's so notice.

454
00:18:57.319 --> 00:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Masonry has boundaries, landmarks and ran lodges that determine your

455
00:19:02.039 --> 00:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>regular and irregular status, but Christian energy doesn't have that.

456
00:19:05.960 --> 00:19:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Hilarious Yeah, well, it's funny because masonry is kind of

457
00:19:08.480 --> 00:19:13.359
<v Speaker 5>an artifact of a world before Protestantism became so boundary lists, right,

458
00:19:13.400 --> 00:19:18.160
<v Speaker 5>I guess right. Protestantism didn't reach its logical conclusions yet,

459
00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:21.880
<v Speaker 5>but masonry has maintained the traditions of that world, that

460
00:19:22.000 --> 00:19:23.559
<v Speaker 5>reality of kind.

461
00:19:23.359 --> 00:19:26.759
<v Speaker 4>Of pre Victorian Victorian elite.

462
00:19:27.359 --> 00:19:33.759
<v Speaker 5>And they're like they're machinations and their pet not a humanism,

463
00:19:33.880 --> 00:19:39.000
<v Speaker 5>a pet perennialism project, it maintained their tradition that Protestantism did.

464
00:19:39.119 --> 00:19:41.759
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy, our time to be Christian. I mean, there's

465
00:19:41.759 --> 00:19:43.039
<v Speaker 1>so many different ways that I think any of us

466
00:19:43.039 --> 00:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>could be pointed out, certainly in judgment the ways that

467
00:19:45.160 --> 00:19:47.519
<v Speaker 1>we've behaved or acted or believed. That's hypocritical to the

468
00:19:47.960 --> 00:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to the faith. And so I would say that if

469
00:19:49.960 --> 00:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody really genuinely believes that Jesus Christ died rose again

470
00:19:52.720 --> 00:19:54.519
<v Speaker 1>for the foraginness of all sins, and they happen to

471
00:19:54.599 --> 00:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>be of a communist persuasion, even though those philosophi are

472
00:19:57.400 --> 00:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>inherently incapatable, I can't really think of any political will

473
00:20:00.119 --> 00:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>have to be that's one hundred percent. Again, the question

474
00:20:02.680 --> 00:20:05.759
<v Speaker 1>wasn't are there people who are deluded who join the

475
00:20:05.759 --> 00:20:08.519
<v Speaker 1>Marxist Party and believe that they're Christians the art? The

476
00:20:08.599 --> 00:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>question was is it theologically consistent and compatible?

477
00:20:12.000 --> 00:20:13.440
<v Speaker 3>So he doesn't. Again they don't.

478
00:20:13.480 --> 00:20:16.799
<v Speaker 1>They never answer the question in terms of like whether

479
00:20:17.000 --> 00:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it's objectively consistent.

480
00:20:19.279 --> 00:20:21.119
<v Speaker 3>They keep going back to, well.

481
00:20:20.920 --> 00:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Personally, I could believe that, and I could see a

482
00:20:24.000 --> 00:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>person becoming I'm not asking is it actually physically possible

483
00:20:28.920 --> 00:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in history that a person thought they were a socialist

484
00:20:31.440 --> 00:20:32.039
<v Speaker 1>and a Christian.

485
00:20:32.720 --> 00:20:34.680
<v Speaker 3>The question is is it consistent.

486
00:20:34.440 --> 00:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Growing with Christianity other than just Christianity. Is it possible

487
00:20:37.519 --> 00:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>to be a Gnostic and a Christian at the same time?

488
00:20:39.160 --> 00:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Define Nasticism, the early Christian sect that teach the Gnostic

489
00:20:41.880 --> 00:20:44.039
<v Speaker 1>teaching well Diile arsenal belief is gnarscissism.

490
00:20:44.079 --> 00:20:46.359
<v Speaker 2>It's heretical, but I think I think a Gnostic would

491
00:20:46.519 --> 00:20:47.240
<v Speaker 2>believe themselves to be.

492
00:20:47.319 --> 00:20:49.279
<v Speaker 1>So you keep saying my personal beliefs. You don't think

493
00:20:49.279 --> 00:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that it is objectively the case. You just think that

494
00:20:50.680 --> 00:20:53.079
<v Speaker 1>it's subjective. So this is the Masonic might double He's

495
00:20:53.160 --> 00:20:55.839
<v Speaker 1>say it's true because this is arsenal belief. Yeah, Darry, Well,

496
00:20:55.839 --> 00:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they're protest not right, So I mean, are you the

497
00:20:58.039 --> 00:21:01.079
<v Speaker 1>only so orthox and Catholics say different than I mean?

498
00:21:01.160 --> 00:21:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Is ups to each Protestant to or decide that for themselves.

499
00:21:03.440 --> 00:21:06.039
<v Speaker 1>You gave a different framework of a belief than you do.

500
00:21:07.319 --> 00:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So again, like the initial argument that there's no authorities,

501
00:21:11.039 --> 00:21:13.039
<v Speaker 1>which was qualified to be there are authorities in the

502
00:21:13.039 --> 00:21:15.759
<v Speaker 1>sense of bodies who govern in the Masonic orders and

503
00:21:15.799 --> 00:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>decide who's in and who's out tells me again that

504
00:21:18.920 --> 00:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>what you find is at every point when you really

505
00:21:20.680 --> 00:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>boil into what they mean, it gets redefined to be

506
00:21:23.599 --> 00:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the very thing that they initially said. And the sales

507
00:21:25.680 --> 00:21:27.799
<v Speaker 1>pitch is not that right. So the sales pitch is

508
00:21:27.799 --> 00:21:29.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a free thinking society of men building a better

509
00:21:29.839 --> 00:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>world to make men better. What is the standard by

510
00:21:32.480 --> 00:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>which you judge and know what makes something better or good?

511
00:21:35.039 --> 00:21:38.279
<v Speaker 1>What's the value judgment there? You know that's a good question.

512
00:21:38.440 --> 00:21:40.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it's explicit. There are certainly opinions,

513
00:21:40.559 --> 00:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly a culture. It's relative, but it's not arguing

514
00:21:43.680 --> 00:21:47.039
<v Speaker 1>for relativism. It's arguing for everybody pursuing the best version

515
00:21:47.079 --> 00:21:50.079
<v Speaker 1>of themselves without making so many explicit claims to what

516
00:21:50.119 --> 00:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that relative. Let me ask you this, Jay, would you

517
00:21:53.279 --> 00:21:57.839
<v Speaker 1>say that Lutheranism is incompatible with Christianity? We don't recognize

518
00:21:57.880 --> 00:22:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Lutheranism as Christianity. Okay, what about out any form of Protestantism,

519
00:22:01.400 --> 00:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Baptist, Church of Christ, just not christian.

520
00:22:04.759 --> 00:22:06.039
<v Speaker 3>This is an emotional appeal.

521
00:22:06.119 --> 00:22:08.519
<v Speaker 1>So Chase goes into just appealing to the audience that

522
00:22:08.599 --> 00:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not a humanist, then I'm mean so I

523
00:22:11.400 --> 00:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>think I called this out as an emotional appeal to

524
00:22:13.680 --> 00:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Christian name, but not authentically. Okay.

525
00:22:15.200 --> 00:22:20.240
<v Speaker 4>So the thing when the debate we had with them,

526
00:22:20.359 --> 00:22:22.640
<v Speaker 4>and he was like, do you, uh, what do you.

527
00:22:22.759 --> 00:22:26.920
<v Speaker 7>Orthodox believe that Roman Catholics worship the same God is?

528
00:22:27.160 --> 00:22:30.119
<v Speaker 4>And I was like, I'm trying to be chitable.

529
00:22:30.279 --> 00:22:31.920
<v Speaker 3>If he pushed me, probably not.

530
00:22:33.720 --> 00:22:35.720
<v Speaker 4>And they use that as an emotional like.

531
00:22:37.039 --> 00:22:41.839
<v Speaker 3>Me, they are, Yeah, but that's what.

532
00:22:41.799 --> 00:22:45.160
<v Speaker 5>They're doing is opening the audience to question the absurdity

533
00:22:45.160 --> 00:22:48.079
<v Speaker 5>of Protestantism and the I mean, he.

534
00:22:48.160 --> 00:22:50.720
<v Speaker 4>Made a great point earlier, and he brought out that they're.

535
00:22:50.680 --> 00:22:56.119
<v Speaker 5>More clear dogmas and boundaries to freemasonry than they're already

536
00:22:56.119 --> 00:22:59.480
<v Speaker 5>even the most Protestant conception of what who Christ is

537
00:22:59.480 --> 00:23:02.920
<v Speaker 5>and the christ Church. So it's it's an insane position

538
00:23:02.960 --> 00:23:05.839
<v Speaker 5>to take, you know what I was thinking too, I mean,

539
00:23:05.920 --> 00:23:09.400
<v Speaker 5>just at like a spiritual and psychological and a psycho

540
00:23:09.400 --> 00:23:13.880
<v Speaker 5>spiritual level, I wonder, you know, part of the appeal

541
00:23:14.200 --> 00:23:18.119
<v Speaker 5>of masonry almost seems to be it's like the the

542
00:23:18.200 --> 00:23:22.400
<v Speaker 5>aesthetics of liturgy that masonry has adopted, because masonry and

543
00:23:22.440 --> 00:23:26.759
<v Speaker 5>the rights and freemasonry are very liturgically, they're like shadowing

544
00:23:27.440 --> 00:23:32.240
<v Speaker 5>liturgical practices and the hierarchy of you know, the worshipful.

545
00:23:31.759 --> 00:23:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Master that comes up later.

546
00:23:34.839 --> 00:23:38.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, it's aping liturgical practices. So you know,

547
00:23:38.640 --> 00:23:41.839
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of brought us just me. That's natural for

548
00:23:41.920 --> 00:23:45.119
<v Speaker 4>human beings that we all want the liturgy. We're all

549
00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:48.200
<v Speaker 4>we all want Christ, the fullness of Christ, and uh,

550
00:23:48.519 --> 00:23:51.319
<v Speaker 4>the lack of that in.

551
00:23:51.200 --> 00:23:54.160
<v Speaker 5>The Protestant world would maybe even lead a lot of

552
00:23:54.200 --> 00:23:58.200
<v Speaker 5>people to try and join Masonry to discratch that age.

553
00:23:59.400 --> 00:24:01.079
<v Speaker 3>So whole thime access for five dollars?

554
00:24:01.160 --> 00:24:03.079
<v Speaker 1>Could the Masons have an argument if they said the

555
00:24:03.200 --> 00:24:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Orthodoxy doesn't have a central structure or a pope either. Now,

556
00:24:07.319 --> 00:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the question is not about a centralized authority versus no authority.

557
00:24:11.119 --> 00:24:13.160
<v Speaker 3>The question is are there authorities at all? I don't

558
00:24:13.160 --> 00:24:13.920
<v Speaker 3>care if you think.

559
00:24:13.759 --> 00:24:18.559
<v Speaker 1>It's a decentralized body of regional grand lodges or whether

560
00:24:18.599 --> 00:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you think that there is one pope. It's not a

561
00:24:20.799 --> 00:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>question of any kind of authority. It's a question of

562
00:24:24.119 --> 00:24:27.319
<v Speaker 1>are you actually bound by authorities? And thus, if you are,

563
00:24:27.519 --> 00:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that violates the idea that there are no authorities and

564
00:24:30.160 --> 00:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not bound by anything in my conscience. That's that's

565
00:24:32.680 --> 00:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the point. Jay r Do you want to say some John,

566
00:24:38.440 --> 00:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>do you want to say something?

567
00:24:41.920 --> 00:24:47.160
<v Speaker 7>Well, no, everything you guys have been seen as really

568
00:24:47.200 --> 00:24:50.240
<v Speaker 7>good in regards to the commentary.

569
00:24:51.039 --> 00:24:58.519
<v Speaker 4>But like at the time of of when when Mazzini

570
00:24:59.039 --> 00:25:03.599
<v Speaker 4>is coming into there's like, like, I.

571
00:25:03.519 --> 00:25:08.359
<v Speaker 7>Don't understand how Masons can't understand that they're all organized

572
00:25:09.000 --> 00:25:15.599
<v Speaker 7>under something directly against the Catholic Church, right, so they're

573
00:25:15.720 --> 00:25:20.440
<v Speaker 7>asking for no authority, no central authority, but then they

574
00:25:20.519 --> 00:25:24.240
<v Speaker 7>themselves are going to be the new central authority. It

575
00:25:24.319 --> 00:25:30.039
<v Speaker 7>seems very simple philosophically now, but these guys don't seem

576
00:25:30.079 --> 00:25:34.480
<v Speaker 7>to recognize that that's an organizing force around the world,

577
00:25:34.599 --> 00:25:39.759
<v Speaker 7>whether it's a French Revolution or you know subsequent Jacobin things.

578
00:25:39.920 --> 00:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, they move the goalpost to make it about

579
00:25:43.279 --> 00:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a centralized authority. I don't care the original

580
00:25:46.440 --> 00:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>statement was. And even even Pike says this Masonry has

581
00:25:50.759 --> 00:25:54.559
<v Speaker 1>no authorities. I'm arguing that they contradict. I don't know

582
00:25:54.559 --> 00:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>why this is so hard for these people to understand.

583
00:25:56.680 --> 00:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just like the Mason mind f because I know

584
00:26:02.039 --> 00:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Albert Pike says that there's no dogmas and they're freethinkers.

585
00:26:06.440 --> 00:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm arguing that that contradicts the idea that you

586
00:26:09.839 --> 00:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>have to believe in these basic dogmas as Chase admit it.

587
00:26:13.319 --> 00:26:15.680
<v Speaker 3>That's the contradiction. That's the argument.

588
00:26:15.720 --> 00:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not asking does some Masons somewhere say you don't

589
00:26:18.400 --> 00:26:20.799
<v Speaker 1>have to believe in any dogmas? Or is there a

590
00:26:20.880 --> 00:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>centralized pope of the Masons. I never I said that.

591
00:26:23.480 --> 00:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>That was never the argument. Only legitimate authentic Christians, in

592
00:26:26.920 --> 00:26:29.559
<v Speaker 1>your point of view, are Greek Orthodox, No any Orthodox,

593
00:26:29.559 --> 00:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>any Orthodoxcuse me, I'm not trying to put words in

594
00:26:31.200 --> 00:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>your mouth. Okay, So if you are not an Orthodox Christian,

595
00:26:33.160 --> 00:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>even if you think that you're going to a Christian

596
00:26:34.480 --> 00:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>church or you're a Christian, you're not legitimately a Christian.

597
00:26:36.440 --> 00:26:38.839
<v Speaker 1>You're either the mistake in or fallen or Okay, how

598
00:26:38.920 --> 00:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is that incompatible with I'm not making a claim. I

599
00:26:41.480 --> 00:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to appoint a ortorical point to make me

600
00:26:43.400 --> 00:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>seem like the dogmatists and you guys are the freethinkers,

601
00:26:45.160 --> 00:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>which is why I frehemptively argue at the beginning that

602
00:26:46.880 --> 00:26:48.839
<v Speaker 1>they're actually dogmentis and non freethinker. Yeah, we can. We've

603
00:26:48.880 --> 00:26:50.319
<v Speaker 1>we've talked a lot about like what we're not in

604
00:26:50.400 --> 00:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>all this, but I'm happy to just talk about what

605
00:26:52.119 --> 00:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we are. You can call it dogma if you's a

606
00:26:53.480 --> 00:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>sales pitch, I'm sales. The audience here and Jade does

607
00:26:56.960 --> 00:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>not believe that you're Christian unless you're Orthodox. Yeah. So

608
00:26:59.000 --> 00:27:01.039
<v Speaker 1>so again, this was a rhetorical It's not an argument,

609
00:27:01.079 --> 00:27:03.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a rhetorical. This cider an appeal to the audience fallacy.

610
00:27:03.279 --> 00:27:05.079
<v Speaker 1>I want everybody to know that. Yeah, all right, let

611
00:27:05.119 --> 00:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>me ask you this, and let me ask you a

612
00:27:06.160 --> 00:27:08.079
<v Speaker 1>little bit different question. Can you anyone who just like

613
00:27:08.160 --> 00:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to know you believe? Can you be well, what's an example,

614
00:27:10.960 --> 00:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>like another secular organization. Can you be a member of

615
00:27:14.839 --> 00:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the Green Party and a Christian? Or is the Green

616
00:27:16.680 --> 00:27:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Party incompatible with Christianity? The Libertarian Party? How about another example?

617
00:27:19.839 --> 00:27:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Can you be a formal member dou is paying member

618
00:27:21.839 --> 00:27:22.839
<v Speaker 1>whatever of the Libertary Party?

619
00:27:22.880 --> 00:27:23.880
<v Speaker 3>And is that compatible?

620
00:27:23.960 --> 00:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Is your question is a false analogy comparing it to

621
00:27:26.759 --> 00:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the Masonic Society, which I do not accept and do

622
00:27:29.200 --> 00:27:32.519
<v Speaker 1>not grant is a non theological society or argument is

623
00:27:32.559 --> 00:27:35.519
<v Speaker 1>premised on that, And the whole opening twenty minutes demonstrated

624
00:27:35.519 --> 00:27:38.079
<v Speaker 1>that you guys are theologically inclined. You just act like

625
00:27:38.079 --> 00:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not. So it's a false equivalence. What is it?

626
00:27:42.039 --> 00:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>A Masonic lodge is not like the Green Party because

627
00:27:43.680 --> 00:27:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the Masonic loge requires theological beliefs, even though you say

628
00:27:45.759 --> 00:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't. They just really, where is a belief in

629
00:27:47.160 --> 00:27:47.599
<v Speaker 1>a supreme being?

630
00:27:47.640 --> 00:27:47.799
<v Speaker 4>Though?

631
00:27:47.799 --> 00:27:50.039
<v Speaker 1>If it is a compatible blow it, it's a compatible

632
00:27:50.079 --> 00:27:52.839
<v Speaker 1>belief No with Christianity because a Chayandia also has this

633
00:27:53.079 --> 00:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>da Notice what he just did there. He said we

634
00:27:54.720 --> 00:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>only require belief in a supreme authority when we already

635
00:27:56.720 --> 00:27:58.279
<v Speaker 1>saw in the first thirty minutes that he qualified that

636
00:27:58.319 --> 00:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, you can't be a satanis and you

637
00:27:59.480 --> 00:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>got believe that. So there's all these other things. That's

638
00:28:01.720 --> 00:28:03.799
<v Speaker 1>a sales pitch when they say it's just this one

639
00:28:03.799 --> 00:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>thing you have to believe, then they turn around and

640
00:28:05.720 --> 00:28:07.559
<v Speaker 1>qualify it with a giant paragraph of all the other

641
00:28:07.640 --> 00:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>things that you can't be and have to believe. It's inconsistent.

642
00:28:09.720 --> 00:28:13.039
<v Speaker 1>That's the point. You don't see that argument. No, Hell,

643
00:28:13.039 --> 00:28:15.759
<v Speaker 1>come on, dude, I don't one dogma that's then qualified

644
00:28:15.799 --> 00:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>by giant paragraph of actually what it really means. It's

645
00:28:18.279 --> 00:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>not one dogma, that's not a wat I'm sorry, it's

646
00:28:21.519 --> 00:28:23.839
<v Speaker 1>not one dogma, one dogma. It's not just one dogma,

647
00:28:24.000 --> 00:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>very few dogmas. Okay, So moving the goal post is

648
00:28:27.480 --> 00:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>what we call the Yeah. So, so I think I

649
00:28:31.480 --> 00:28:33.599
<v Speaker 1>think that was a pretty good gotcha there, right, like,

650
00:28:33.680 --> 00:28:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and then we're about to shift into I think DJ

651
00:28:35.400 --> 00:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is about to shift it into something different. There's like

652
00:28:37.200 --> 00:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>quires membership.

653
00:28:38.160 --> 00:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, go ahead, Ryan, Yeah, I'll call a sales pitch.

654
00:28:41.640 --> 00:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>However you want to frame it, you can do that.

655
00:28:43.680 --> 00:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just the truth.

656
00:28:45.799 --> 00:28:48.079
<v Speaker 2>I said the simple version was nothing, and then I

657
00:28:48.079 --> 00:28:49.279
<v Speaker 2>said there's more to it than that, and then we

658
00:28:49.279 --> 00:28:51.480
<v Speaker 2>can get into it later. There's no attempt to hide

659
00:28:51.559 --> 00:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>or it's it's a simplification for the matter of debate, it's.

660
00:28:53.880 --> 00:28:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Moving the goal post. That's not simplification. We'll call it.

661
00:28:56.279 --> 00:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Which one's a fallacy and one's lanning.

662
00:28:58.160 --> 00:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>There's lots of belief beefs and teachings within masonry. There's

663
00:29:02.240 --> 00:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>few requirements or dogmas, one of which is this belief

664
00:29:05.400 --> 00:29:08.960
<v Speaker 2>in a supreme being to whom Tennessee might be worded

665
00:29:09.000 --> 00:29:11.079
<v Speaker 2>differently in other jurisdictions.

666
00:29:12.920 --> 00:29:16.480
<v Speaker 4>A fallacy either because we can't truly objective to know.

667
00:29:16.440 --> 00:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Anything earlier, Well, he did he seemed to not care

668
00:29:20.240 --> 00:29:22.799
<v Speaker 1>about fallacies, So I think you're right, like, he doesn't

669
00:29:22.799 --> 00:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>care if it's a fallacier and I call whatever you want, Well,

670
00:29:25.359 --> 00:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>calling it a fallacy is really important.

671
00:29:27.000 --> 00:29:29.200
<v Speaker 2>If it is a fallacy, Tennessee, you have to be

672
00:29:29.640 --> 00:29:33.319
<v Speaker 2>a of lawful age, which we require eighteen some jurisdictions.

673
00:29:33.319 --> 00:29:35.839
<v Speaker 2>It's twenty one. He can't be a female, he can't

674
00:29:35.839 --> 00:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>be an atheist. You have to be a sound mind.

675
00:29:38.480 --> 00:29:40.359
<v Speaker 2>We say, he can't be an old man in dotage,

676
00:29:40.680 --> 00:29:42.519
<v Speaker 2>which is essentially you know, you have to batge your

677
00:29:42.519 --> 00:29:43.759
<v Speaker 2>moral fact but Joe by, don't you.

678
00:29:43.880 --> 00:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, can be Joe Biden.

679
00:29:46.240 --> 00:29:49.359
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, there's some base level requirements. And then as

680
00:29:49.519 --> 00:29:53.359
<v Speaker 2>we are interviewing people, we try to discover your moral characters,

681
00:29:53.400 --> 00:29:56.079
<v Speaker 2>so to speak. And you know that can be subjective.

682
00:29:56.079 --> 00:29:58.119
<v Speaker 2>I would suppose you know, we're not experts in that,

683
00:29:58.160 --> 00:29:59.680
<v Speaker 2>but we we do our best in trying to figure

684
00:29:59.680 --> 00:30:02.759
<v Speaker 2>out who are as the individual. For me at least,

685
00:30:02.839 --> 00:30:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I would say, you know, if you're a Satanist, don't

686
00:30:05.440 --> 00:30:07.359
<v Speaker 2>meet their requirements. If you're a Communist, I would say

687
00:30:07.400 --> 00:30:09.079
<v Speaker 2>that would also, Yeah, I meet there is it up

688
00:30:09.119 --> 00:30:12.160
<v Speaker 2>to you. It's up to the individual. Lodge and it's

689
00:30:12.160 --> 00:30:14.079
<v Speaker 2>a nanotus boat. So yeah, in some ways, if only

690
00:30:14.119 --> 00:30:15.640
<v Speaker 2>one one I could accept the Satan, that's another one

691
00:30:15.640 --> 00:30:18.319
<v Speaker 2>could in Its theoretically possible. But I've been a Mason

692
00:30:18.359 --> 00:30:19.920
<v Speaker 2>for eighteen years now, I know thousands of Masons.

693
00:30:19.960 --> 00:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I've never met a.

694
00:30:20.920 --> 00:30:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Boyn isn't that it's it's it's a could I lodge

695
00:30:23.440 --> 00:30:25.599
<v Speaker 2>let someone in who shouldn't get in? Yesn't see. The

696
00:30:25.680 --> 00:30:27.880
<v Speaker 2>question is how do you determine what good moral character is?

697
00:30:27.880 --> 00:30:30.119
<v Speaker 2>What's the standard and chasea that's a good question. So

698
00:30:30.559 --> 00:30:33.319
<v Speaker 2>if this is a society based around ethics and values

699
00:30:33.559 --> 00:30:37.200
<v Speaker 2>and value judgments, those are metaphysical ethical claims.

700
00:30:37.200 --> 00:30:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what the good is. How do

701
00:30:38.359 --> 00:30:40.839
<v Speaker 1>we determine the good? I think that's up to It's

702
00:30:40.880 --> 00:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>up to you with your relationship with God. Okay, but

703
00:30:43.000 --> 00:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>your other Massonic brothers can be Hindus who determine the

704
00:30:45.640 --> 00:30:48.079
<v Speaker 1>good according to Hinduism, right, Yeah, there's a situation in

705
00:30:48.079 --> 00:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>which that is. Yeah, okay, So how do we know

706
00:30:49.720 --> 00:30:51.359
<v Speaker 1>what the good is? It sounds relatives. Again, I don't

707
00:30:51.359 --> 00:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>know that Freemasonry makes a claim as to which of

708
00:30:53.519 --> 00:30:56.519
<v Speaker 1>those persuasions is correct. Then how are you going to

709
00:30:56.559 --> 00:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>be Howard matter and good men better if you don't

710
00:30:58.240 --> 00:31:00.599
<v Speaker 1>even know whether Hinduism is better than Protestanism or not.

711
00:31:00.640 --> 00:31:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Because it doesn't make those claims in the context of

712
00:31:02.480 --> 00:31:05.279
<v Speaker 2>like past the Salvation. When it comes to our system,

713
00:31:05.359 --> 00:31:06.759
<v Speaker 2>like you asked, how do we make good and better?

714
00:31:06.799 --> 00:31:09.119
<v Speaker 2>We do have moral and philosophical teachings which are what

715
00:31:09.240 --> 00:31:13.279
<v Speaker 2>based on what philosophy and morals that are brought in

716
00:31:13.440 --> 00:31:15.680
<v Speaker 2>that are ar to Russells, Well, I'm a least let

717
00:31:15.680 --> 00:31:17.039
<v Speaker 2>me answer, and I'll just tell you that's easy.

718
00:31:17.079 --> 00:31:18.599
<v Speaker 1>You can just quick cut me off and on said

719
00:31:18.599 --> 00:31:21.319
<v Speaker 1>berge at Russell's philosophy or ET's philosophy.

720
00:31:21.400 --> 00:31:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Like a lot of you what I say, you can't

721
00:31:23.559 --> 00:31:24.039
<v Speaker 3>you can't hear.

722
00:31:24.240 --> 00:31:28.400
<v Speaker 7>This is bizarre because like my dad was a Protestant

723
00:31:28.440 --> 00:31:33.680
<v Speaker 7>minister and he hated premasons because of this exact thing.

724
00:31:34.039 --> 00:31:39.559
<v Speaker 7>Like it everything that they're claiming as a Protestant is

725
00:31:40.480 --> 00:31:43.920
<v Speaker 7>like the masonics of circumvents scripture.

726
00:31:44.119 --> 00:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, paradigm.

727
00:31:50.160 --> 00:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's there's two different It divides you against yourself, right,

728
00:31:53.880 --> 00:31:56.039
<v Speaker 1>and this is really the idea of the public private

729
00:31:56.359 --> 00:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>divide that America has. Right you can have your private religion.

730
00:31:59.640 --> 00:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Just don't let us spill over into the public sphere

731
00:32:02.920 --> 00:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole. That's what that that is a Masonic idea,

732
00:32:06.319 --> 00:32:09.039
<v Speaker 1>tell you so, Uh, we teach the four Carnal virtues for.

733
00:32:09.200 --> 00:32:11.200
<v Speaker 5>This is people that are involved in politics as well,

734
00:32:11.240 --> 00:32:14.079
<v Speaker 5>because it's like, well, you know politics, this is a

735
00:32:14.119 --> 00:32:18.079
<v Speaker 5>game of optics. It's a game of presentations, a game

736
00:32:18.160 --> 00:32:21.799
<v Speaker 5>of convincing people that have compromised and that's separate from

737
00:32:21.799 --> 00:32:22.799
<v Speaker 5>my spiritual life.

738
00:32:23.200 --> 00:32:23.599
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

739
00:32:24.440 --> 00:32:26.400
<v Speaker 4>You get problems on both ends of that of.

740
00:32:26.319 --> 00:32:27.640
<v Speaker 3>That that divice exactly.

741
00:32:27.880 --> 00:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, to be produced temperance and justice. Why are we

742
00:32:30.240 --> 00:32:34.599
<v Speaker 1>supposed to accept those like this is what we teach? Okay,

743
00:32:34.680 --> 00:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>but why are we supposed to think that's right? You

744
00:32:36.960 --> 00:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>don't really have to Well, do they make a clai

745
00:32:39.559 --> 00:32:41.319
<v Speaker 1>relatives's a back to best of what we've been thinking about.

746
00:32:41.400 --> 00:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Do they make a claim that that's right or is

747
00:32:42.720 --> 00:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it just that's part of the group and if you

748
00:32:44.240 --> 00:32:45.279
<v Speaker 1>want to join it, so be it.

749
00:32:46.039 --> 00:32:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Well we teach that these Yeah, that those are right.

750
00:32:48.200 --> 00:32:50.720
<v Speaker 2>We tell you, just did the you know, the seven

751
00:32:50.759 --> 00:32:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Arts and sciences are the way to make your ape,

752
00:32:52.920 --> 00:32:54.240
<v Speaker 2>way to make yourself a better man.

753
00:32:54.480 --> 00:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Trivia. I'm starting to now all of the Masonic conspiracies now,

754
00:32:57.240 --> 00:32:59.079
<v Speaker 1>because there's no way that this sect could have actually

755
00:32:59.200 --> 00:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>organized any meaning full revolution in history. It's a joke.

756
00:33:01.720 --> 00:33:04.319
<v Speaker 1>It's a joke. It's just a joke. Yeah. I made

757
00:33:04.400 --> 00:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Chase really mad with that joke because I was arguing

758
00:33:06.759 --> 00:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that these guys are too dumb to actually have organized

759
00:33:09.200 --> 00:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>any real revolutions that were ever successful. This is the

760
00:33:13.480 --> 00:33:15.839
<v Speaker 1>point where Chase gets Chase gets really mad at me,

761
00:33:15.920 --> 00:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and he just starts like he's just seething, staring at me.

762
00:33:18.799 --> 00:33:20.799
<v Speaker 3>And I thought after this he was going to leave.

763
00:33:20.920 --> 00:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Rather get mad now. So I'm not angry. I just

764
00:33:22.960 --> 00:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have a response. No, that's you asked for us

765
00:33:26.160 --> 00:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to answer a question. We start to ask you. Do

766
00:33:27.920 --> 00:33:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you think that you have to be full You mentioned

767
00:33:29.359 --> 00:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>philosophy that you have to be philosophically consistent in your argumentation.

768
00:33:33.279 --> 00:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Sure you have to be for what to be a

769
00:33:35.279 --> 00:33:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Mason and a debate. Yeah, yeah, I think that that

770
00:33:37.880 --> 00:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>would be ideal. Yeah, okay, So can I make fallacious

771
00:33:40.480 --> 00:33:42.759
<v Speaker 1>arguments against Masonry? Would you call it out? Were calling out?

772
00:33:42.799 --> 00:33:44.519
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? So when you guys make bad arguments and

773
00:33:44.519 --> 00:33:45.759
<v Speaker 1>I ask you what the standard of the good is

774
00:33:45.799 --> 00:33:47.559
<v Speaker 1>and you say it's just these virtues, and then you

775
00:33:47.599 --> 00:33:49.559
<v Speaker 1>say that I hits just these virtues.

776
00:33:49.599 --> 00:33:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it is those and more, it's part of it,

777
00:33:52.279 --> 00:33:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and Laura, yeah, it's a lot to it.

778
00:33:53.519 --> 00:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And then you say that a Hindu can be in

779
00:33:55.079 --> 00:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and he can have his system, and this other guy

780
00:33:57.440 --> 00:33:59.759
<v Speaker 1>over here can be a Protestant and whatever. That's the

781
00:33:59.759 --> 00:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>point is that there is no standard of good by

782
00:34:01.920 --> 00:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which you're making good men better. It's arbitrary, and I

783
00:34:03.960 --> 00:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>can't figure out how am I going to be a

784
00:34:05.640 --> 00:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>philosophically better man. We're going to make good men better

785
00:34:08.280 --> 00:34:10.639
<v Speaker 1>if there's no standard of what makes men good, if

786
00:34:10.639 --> 00:34:14.679
<v Speaker 1>it's subjective, and you allow satanic demonic people like Hindus

787
00:34:14.719 --> 00:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they have a Satanic religion, if they're allowed to come

788
00:34:16.880 --> 00:34:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in and say that, well, my standard of good is

789
00:34:18.840 --> 00:34:20.679
<v Speaker 1>to worship Shiva. I can be can be a Thuggie

790
00:34:20.880 --> 00:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and be amazing tumble of doom. They didn't know what

791
00:34:24.960 --> 00:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>thuggies were. I made a temple of doom joke, which

792
00:34:28.559 --> 00:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>is like the you know, human sacrifice sect of Hinduism,

793
00:34:33.400 --> 00:34:35.199
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, was there was a real human

794
00:34:35.239 --> 00:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>sacrifice sect. And then that they act like in order

795
00:34:37.480 --> 00:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to skirt the joke, they act like, I don't know,

796
00:34:40.599 --> 00:34:42.639
<v Speaker 1>you never watched Temple of Doom. I don't know what

797
00:34:42.760 --> 00:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that is. It's a joke. I don't know.

798
00:34:45.519 --> 00:34:46.199
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't have.

799
00:34:47.800 --> 00:34:49.760
<v Speaker 3>You don't know the Thuggies.

800
00:34:50.159 --> 00:34:54.039
<v Speaker 1>Dude, I grew up watching I've watched Temple of Doom

801
00:34:54.039 --> 00:34:56.159
<v Speaker 1>probably five hundred times.

802
00:34:56.440 --> 00:34:57.559
<v Speaker 4>That was my favorite.

803
00:34:59.320 --> 00:35:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Well that's just that's just that's that's on you.

804
00:35:03.119 --> 00:35:06.239
<v Speaker 4>The Hassions. It's going to lead you to the Thuggies.

805
00:35:06.320 --> 00:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, Like there's all kinds of monotheistic or well,

806
00:35:13.480 --> 00:35:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, I look, the best argument here is

807
00:35:16.800 --> 00:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>they allow Hindus in. Okay, Hindus believe in just absolutely

808
00:35:20.400 --> 00:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>demonic stuff, like so you're gonna make good Hindus better

809
00:35:24.400 --> 00:35:25.280
<v Speaker 1>with Christians together.

810
00:35:25.320 --> 00:35:26.239
<v Speaker 3>It's just so stupid.

811
00:35:26.360 --> 00:35:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, nobody's seen Temple of Dream. It's in compatible with Christianity. Okay.

812
00:35:31.239 --> 00:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the other thing that's bad about this

813
00:35:32.760 --> 00:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>recording is there was like ten times the audience was

814
00:35:35.840 --> 00:35:38.559
<v Speaker 1>cracking up. And that's another reason why they got mad.

815
00:35:38.960 --> 00:35:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Because when I made the joke about there's no way

816
00:35:40.719 --> 00:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>these guys could organize a successful revolution, the audience laugh

817
00:35:44.039 --> 00:35:46.159
<v Speaker 1>really hard and that's what made Chase really mad.

818
00:35:46.440 --> 00:35:48.119
<v Speaker 3>But you can't hear any the audience laughing on this.

819
00:35:49.400 --> 00:35:51.159
<v Speaker 1>All right, this is a let's pivot for a second

820
00:35:51.159 --> 00:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and talk about oaths. This is an interesting topic because

821
00:35:55.719 --> 00:35:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in Freemasonry you have to take odes. I don't want

822
00:35:57.840 --> 00:35:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to speak for you, guys, but my understanding is that's

823
00:35:59.760 --> 00:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the case. And I want to read a Bible verse

824
00:36:02.440 --> 00:36:05.119
<v Speaker 1>from James five twelve, which says, above all my brothers

825
00:36:05.159 --> 00:36:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and sisters do not swear, not by heaven or earth

826
00:36:08.039 --> 00:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>or anything else. All you need to say is a

827
00:36:09.880 --> 00:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>simple yes or no, otherwise you will be condemned. Now,

828
00:36:13.840 --> 00:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll just take it over to the Masons here. Either

829
00:36:15.280 --> 00:36:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of you guys can pick this up. But how do

830
00:36:17.320 --> 00:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you interpret that verse and also take oaths on your

831
00:36:20.800 --> 00:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>journey assent in freemasonry?

832
00:36:23.360 --> 00:36:27.239
<v Speaker 2>To ahead Ryan, Yeah, so my interpretation doesn't come from Freemasonry.

833
00:36:27.280 --> 00:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>That's just what I was taught. That person is all right,

834
00:36:30.039 --> 00:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna skip this because this is not even a

835
00:36:32.000 --> 00:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>contentious point. This is just kind of a Protestant, like

836
00:36:35.760 --> 00:36:39.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, Quaker Baptist thing like can you take oaths?

837
00:36:39.079 --> 00:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, yeah, of course, we don't think that

838
00:36:41.039 --> 00:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>all oaths are wrong. You take an oath when you

839
00:36:43.360 --> 00:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>get married. So I'm just gonna skip this part because

840
00:36:44.920 --> 00:36:47.559
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't really much there. So quick clarifying question is

841
00:36:47.920 --> 00:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>what is the principle by which an oath goes too far?

842
00:36:50.800 --> 00:36:54.199
<v Speaker 1>In the Forum of James five twelve, So like if

843
00:36:54.159 --> 00:36:55.199
<v Speaker 1>you were to say, it's where to God, I'll be

844
00:36:55.199 --> 00:36:56.639
<v Speaker 1>there tomorrow on time, that's a good example. But do

845
00:36:56.639 --> 00:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you have like a prince, So what is the like

846
00:36:59.360 --> 00:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>sorting principle for the two things? You know, where it's

847
00:37:01.760 --> 00:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>good or bad? Is there an aligned the sand or

848
00:37:03.519 --> 00:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is it just kind of a well, I think yeah,

849
00:37:05.480 --> 00:37:09.639
<v Speaker 1>it's good. Ques what oaths that are required on his person.

850
00:37:09.920 --> 00:37:12.159
<v Speaker 1>What I argue is that oaths are not the issue.

851
00:37:12.199 --> 00:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>It's rather the blood oaths that masonry requires. Here at

852
00:37:14.760 --> 00:37:16.039
<v Speaker 1>all you have to do is say yes or no,

853
00:37:18.000 --> 00:37:19.599
<v Speaker 1>you actually agree with all that. I don't take any

854
00:37:19.599 --> 00:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>issue with any of that. I would say that, you know,

855
00:37:22.000 --> 00:37:24.199
<v Speaker 1>obviously we take oaths. If you go to court, you

856
00:37:24.239 --> 00:37:25.639
<v Speaker 1>lay your hand on the Bible and you take an oath.

857
00:37:25.960 --> 00:37:27.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, was any problem with that? I don't think

858
00:37:27.159 --> 00:37:29.079
<v Speaker 1>we've ever had a problem with that. We take an

859
00:37:29.119 --> 00:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>oath in marriage as they pointed out, but I would

860
00:37:31.920 --> 00:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>say that the what oaths that are required for masonry

861
00:37:36.519 --> 00:37:40.280
<v Speaker 1>might be problematic. My blood oath like the blood spill roads.

862
00:37:40.519 --> 00:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, you don't play what your oads mean? Well,

863
00:37:43.559 --> 00:37:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I hear the blood oath I think of, and maybe I'm

864
00:37:45.280 --> 00:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>just totally wrong about this, so please clarify. I think

865
00:37:47.480 --> 00:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of like somebody actually cutting their hand open, and there's

866
00:37:49.480 --> 00:37:51.519
<v Speaker 1>blood involved in the oath. I mean, don't you take

867
00:37:51.519 --> 00:37:53.679
<v Speaker 1>an oath to have your throats lit? Shouldlah blah blah

868
00:37:53.639 --> 00:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>blah blah happen? So there's penalties in these obligations.

869
00:37:57.400 --> 00:37:59.239
<v Speaker 3>And then they don't want to talk about this is funny.

870
00:38:00.079 --> 00:38:03.719
<v Speaker 2>Uh, we won't discuss the specifics of those allegations.

871
00:38:04.079 --> 00:38:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Ah. Interesting, Why does any want to discuss the specifics

872
00:38:07.679 --> 00:38:09.679
<v Speaker 1>of the blood oath? Yeah?

873
00:38:09.719 --> 00:38:12.559
<v Speaker 2>You can laugh at that, you know, Uh you can.

874
00:38:12.599 --> 00:38:14.199
<v Speaker 2>You can go find them online if you want. You know,

875
00:38:14.199 --> 00:38:16.119
<v Speaker 2>if you can find them online, on you and I

876
00:38:16.159 --> 00:38:19.880
<v Speaker 2>would well, I'll explain. I will simply say that if

877
00:38:19.880 --> 00:38:23.599
<v Speaker 2>you believe those are literal oaths, maybe may your claim

878
00:38:23.920 --> 00:38:26.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe you interpreted symbolic. That's why I said, depending upon

879
00:38:26.360 --> 00:38:28.039
<v Speaker 2>how one interprets those oaths, now, I know that there

880
00:38:28.079 --> 00:38:29.880
<v Speaker 2>have been cases like the William Morgan affair where it

881
00:38:29.920 --> 00:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>was not interpreted as purely symbolic. Maybe you guys nowadays

882
00:38:33.039 --> 00:38:34.159
<v Speaker 2>don't hold to that. So I don't want to be

883
00:38:34.239 --> 00:38:36.760
<v Speaker 2>unfair to you. I would steal men your position, But I.

884
00:38:36.679 --> 00:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Mean, like, uh, you know, in your in your rights

885
00:38:39.960 --> 00:38:41.559
<v Speaker 1>for example, and you can correct me if this is wrong.

886
00:38:41.599 --> 00:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>The Royal Arts Degree, you reveal that the true name

887
00:38:44.480 --> 00:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of God is jab Bulan yahweh bail and on. So

888
00:38:47.880 --> 00:38:50.679
<v Speaker 1>that's in your liturgies, that's your rights and your rituals.

889
00:38:50.719 --> 00:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>That's not your theologians or your speculators. Here. I don't

890
00:38:53.400 --> 00:38:55.679
<v Speaker 1>see how that any Christian would literally think that the

891
00:38:55.760 --> 00:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>name of God is Jabalon and then say that this

892
00:38:57.559 --> 00:38:59.400
<v Speaker 1>is not a theological society. And I can interpret this

893
00:38:59.400 --> 00:39:01.119
<v Speaker 1>however I want. It just doesn't make any sense. I

894
00:39:01.159 --> 00:39:03.159
<v Speaker 1>would argue that Freemasonry never makes a claim as to

895
00:39:03.159 --> 00:39:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what the real name, true Daum of God is. I mean,

896
00:39:05.360 --> 00:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is that part of the Royal Arts Degree. I don't

897
00:39:06.840 --> 00:39:09.199
<v Speaker 1>believe so. And the York right capitular side doesn't have

898
00:39:09.239 --> 00:39:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the name Jabulan. I do not believe that freemasonring claims

899
00:39:13.559 --> 00:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to define the name of God explicitly correct. So notice

900
00:39:16.480 --> 00:39:21.079
<v Speaker 1>that this was part of the Royal Arts degree until

901
00:39:21.119 --> 00:39:25.519
<v Speaker 1>it was removed by English Grand Lodge Chapters in nineteen

902
00:39:25.559 --> 00:39:28.119
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine. So this is not true according to them

903
00:39:28.199 --> 00:39:31.320
<v Speaker 1>saying they may not have known this, right, but it

904
00:39:31.480 --> 00:39:34.159
<v Speaker 1>was part of the ritual. So that you're saying that

905
00:39:34.320 --> 00:39:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is not part of the Royal Arts degree in the

906
00:39:35.920 --> 00:39:38.159
<v Speaker 1>York Right's capitular side. It's been a long time since

907
00:39:38.159 --> 00:39:40.079
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that degree. But yes, that is what I'm saying,

908
00:39:40.280 --> 00:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, So everybody note this, because he's making a

909
00:39:42.400 --> 00:39:44.079
<v Speaker 1>claim that I think he's I don't have the whole

910
00:39:44.079 --> 00:39:45.599
<v Speaker 1>liturgy in front of me of their rights, but I

911
00:39:45.639 --> 00:39:49.119
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's that that's true. But when you go

912
00:39:49.119 --> 00:39:51.639
<v Speaker 1>into lodge and I see, for example, that there's the floor,

913
00:39:51.679 --> 00:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and that there's the Jacob and Boaz and all this

914
00:39:53.760 --> 00:39:56.639
<v Speaker 1>temple symbolism, how is all of this Old Testament temple

915
00:39:56.679 --> 00:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff not religious? What's what's your definition of religious? Well,

916
00:40:02.480 --> 00:40:04.119
<v Speaker 1>you told me and you said that it's not a religion,

917
00:40:04.159 --> 00:40:06.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a philosophy. Yet when I walk into a lodge,

918
00:40:06.280 --> 00:40:09.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a celestial vision into the heavens and the stars,

919
00:40:09.119 --> 00:40:10.519
<v Speaker 1>and there's Jacin and Boaz, which is out of the

920
00:40:10.519 --> 00:40:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament. It's the temple we just by the way

921
00:40:12.679 --> 00:40:14.400
<v Speaker 1>toured the I see what you're saying, Jay, that there

922
00:40:14.400 --> 00:40:17.559
<v Speaker 1>are certainly elements of Freemasonry that are derived from religion

923
00:40:17.639 --> 00:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and specifically Knxalis Semple Jacobo and has all that stuff. Yes,

924
00:40:21.559 --> 00:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a religion, it's a philosophy. Correct these

925
00:40:24.760 --> 00:40:26.159
<v Speaker 1>does the stream cut out for a second?

926
00:40:27.039 --> 00:40:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Is it back? It looks like maybe it's backwards.

927
00:40:29.199 --> 00:40:34.119
<v Speaker 2>The symbols, the entire name Freemasons comes from stone mason guilds.

928
00:40:34.639 --> 00:40:39.000
<v Speaker 2>We use the tools of masons, We use the story

929
00:40:39.159 --> 00:40:42.280
<v Speaker 2>of the building of King Solomon's temple to teach certain

930
00:40:42.400 --> 00:40:43.639
<v Speaker 2>moral and philosophical This is.

931
00:40:43.639 --> 00:40:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Where they also really begin to falter because I started

932
00:40:46.039 --> 00:40:50.639
<v Speaker 1>pointing out all the religious theological symbology everywhere in masonry.

933
00:40:50.880 --> 00:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>As they say, it's nothing to do with religion.

934
00:40:53.400 --> 00:40:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Principles, you know, just because we have a story out

935
00:40:57.280 --> 00:41:00.400
<v Speaker 2>of the Old Testament or the pillars they were outside

936
00:41:00.440 --> 00:41:01.440
<v Speaker 2>of I.

937
00:41:01.360 --> 00:41:03.039
<v Speaker 1>Mean just a story. Or is every element of the

938
00:41:03.079 --> 00:41:05.800
<v Speaker 1>lodge in some ways symbolic metaphysical realities like the tile

939
00:41:05.800 --> 00:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>floor and the dualities in nature and Jacob and Boaz

940
00:41:08.039 --> 00:41:10.559
<v Speaker 1>the two pillars from the temple, Is it not, for example,

941
00:41:10.559 --> 00:41:14.639
<v Speaker 1>based on Kabbala. The has elements of Kabala, some relations

942
00:41:14.679 --> 00:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and masonry. So again, the ambiguity in the term it's

943
00:41:17.400 --> 00:41:20.519
<v Speaker 1>just a philosophy not a religion, is ambiguous precisely because

944
00:41:20.599 --> 00:41:23.679
<v Speaker 1>you can elastically remove how far you want to make

945
00:41:23.719 --> 00:41:26.320
<v Speaker 1>religion and theology. When again, I think this whole discussion

946
00:41:26.360 --> 00:41:28.800
<v Speaker 1>has shown that there's all kinds of theological positions and

947
00:41:28.840 --> 00:41:32.679
<v Speaker 1>principles replete throughout, not just the Certainly theological positions and

948
00:41:32.719 --> 00:41:36.199
<v Speaker 1>principles are are brought forth, but for the sake of contemplation,

949
00:41:36.280 --> 00:41:37.599
<v Speaker 1>not so much as for the sake of making a

950
00:41:37.639 --> 00:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>claim as to their.

951
00:41:38.760 --> 00:41:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we don't I'm not a cabolist just because there's elements.

952
00:41:41.880 --> 00:41:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But the point is not are you a cabolist?

953
00:41:43.639 --> 00:41:45.800
<v Speaker 1>The point is that it's not just a philosophy, it's

954
00:41:45.840 --> 00:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>replete with theological meaning. Do you think the religions contain philosophy? Yeah,

955
00:41:50.440 --> 00:41:52.119
<v Speaker 1>but that's not the question. The question is is free

956
00:41:52.119 --> 00:41:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Mason is just a philosophy? If they do contain philosophy,

957
00:41:54.920 --> 00:41:58.039
<v Speaker 1>we can't pull this Pallas because it's a parts whole fallacy.

958
00:41:58.079 --> 00:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm arguing against your position that you said it's just

959
00:42:00.719 --> 00:42:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a philosophy. I didn't claim that there's no overlap between

960
00:42:02.840 --> 00:42:05.199
<v Speaker 1>religion and philosophy. You said it's just a philosophy. Yeah,

961
00:42:05.239 --> 00:42:07.079
<v Speaker 1>and I said that we pull from those philosophies from

962
00:42:07.119 --> 00:42:10.519
<v Speaker 1>different religions. So it's but then it's a religious that

963
00:42:10.559 --> 00:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>also a religious group. No, how is it not. I

964
00:42:14.519 --> 00:42:17.199
<v Speaker 1>don't understand how it is religious just because certain elements

965
00:42:17.199 --> 00:42:21.119
<v Speaker 1>of Freemasonry. He your literature, you Freemasonry rituals include give

966
00:42:21.159 --> 00:42:24.559
<v Speaker 1>the name of God in secret tetragrammaton. It's obviously religious.

967
00:42:24.559 --> 00:42:26.639
<v Speaker 1>What are you talking about? And then you're casting it

968
00:42:26.719 --> 00:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>as it's not religious, it's just a bunch of bros.

969
00:42:28.960 --> 00:42:32.119
<v Speaker 1>And we're whatever, Like, no, you're actually doing religious based rituals.

970
00:42:32.559 --> 00:42:36.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can have you can have ceremonies, rituals, initiations,

971
00:42:36.599 --> 00:42:39.239
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call them, that have elements derived

972
00:42:39.280 --> 00:42:43.440
<v Speaker 1>from religions without making any explicit, explicit religious claims. But

973
00:42:43.480 --> 00:42:45.559
<v Speaker 1>two already made a bunch of explicit religious claims in

974
00:42:45.599 --> 00:42:48.199
<v Speaker 1>the first hour, just like this is I hope everybody

975
00:42:48.199 --> 00:42:51.079
<v Speaker 1>sees this right now, they're going back to the whole

976
00:42:51.079 --> 00:42:54.639
<v Speaker 1>thing that it took an hour to establish. Right, God exists, No,

977
00:42:55.039 --> 00:42:56.519
<v Speaker 1>and then you qualified it to say it's not just

978
00:42:56.519 --> 00:43:00.159
<v Speaker 1>God exists. Actually, in fact, that was the point. I'm

979
00:43:00.199 --> 00:43:01.639
<v Speaker 1>not following. Oka, Yeah you are, you just don't want

980
00:43:01.639 --> 00:43:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to do. I have a question here. So it's the

981
00:43:04.360 --> 00:43:07.079
<v Speaker 1>temple part aside. If I'm not sure exactly what you're

982
00:43:07.079 --> 00:43:09.280
<v Speaker 1>referencing with the jab Balon thing, If there's an explicit

983
00:43:09.320 --> 00:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>claim on God itself, which is it seems like that's

984
00:43:12.400 --> 00:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>what's Jane and sinuating that does seem like that would

985
00:43:14.000 --> 00:43:16.599
<v Speaker 1>be in violation of some pretty core Christian principles. What

986
00:43:16.960 --> 00:43:19.159
<v Speaker 1>is the actually can you just flesh out what that

987
00:43:19.280 --> 00:43:21.039
<v Speaker 1>is and have them So I'm trying to find their

988
00:43:21.079 --> 00:43:23.760
<v Speaker 1>actual older did you know this reference? What is jab Alon?

989
00:43:23.760 --> 00:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not okay, ye, I'm not familiar with that. You

990
00:43:26.000 --> 00:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>This is in every Masonic book by the way, this like,

991
00:43:28.840 --> 00:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe they don't know what it is, but

992
00:43:30.519 --> 00:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's also very convenient for them to not know what

993
00:43:32.519 --> 00:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it is when it's pretty well known. So it's the

994
00:43:35.000 --> 00:43:40.280
<v Speaker 1>older Royal arch Masonry rituals which include the term jab Bulon,

995
00:43:40.320 --> 00:43:43.679
<v Speaker 1>which is supposedly the lost sacred name of God. And

996
00:43:43.719 --> 00:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it's not just some Internet side and

997
00:43:46.000 --> 00:43:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it's also I mean, the name of God is a

998
00:43:48.519 --> 00:43:51.599
<v Speaker 1>huge issue that Albert Mackie as an example, not an authority,

999
00:43:51.599 --> 00:43:55.400
<v Speaker 1>as an example, says that finding out who the name

1000
00:43:55.440 --> 00:43:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of God is and what the name of God is,

1001
00:43:57.199 --> 00:44:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he says, is very important to Mason's because he must

1002
00:44:00.320 --> 00:44:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be determined through a Cabbalistic Zohar based interpretation. Ooh, I

1003
00:44:05.760 --> 00:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>thought it wasn't religious. The whole religion is based, the

1004
00:44:09.440 --> 00:44:12.159
<v Speaker 1>whole philosophy of Mastream is based around the name of God,

1005
00:44:12.199 --> 00:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the Tetragrammaton and interpreting it in a Kabbalistic Zohar sense.

1006
00:44:19.119 --> 00:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And he says, if you want to know where to

1007
00:44:20.519 --> 00:44:22.079
<v Speaker 1>look at this, he says, look to the Talmut and

1008
00:44:22.119 --> 00:44:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the Zohar. So again, the Tetragrammaton is, according to him,

1009
00:44:26.599 --> 00:44:29.559
<v Speaker 1>the male and female principles of nature, the generative and

1010
00:44:29.599 --> 00:44:34.840
<v Speaker 1>prolific energies of creation. So this is all metaphysical theological speculation.

1011
00:44:35.360 --> 00:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>And then they're saying that, no, it's just a philosophy,

1012
00:44:37.280 --> 00:44:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just the symbols and you can maybe crafted into

1013
00:44:39.320 --> 00:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want. Where do you get the idea that

1014
00:44:40.920 --> 00:44:43.039
<v Speaker 1>you can take all the symbols of Solomon's Temple and

1015
00:44:43.039 --> 00:44:45.239
<v Speaker 1>craft them into anything that you want. To me, that's preposterous.

1016
00:44:47.400 --> 00:44:49.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're crafting them into anything that we want.

1017
00:44:49.639 --> 00:44:51.639
<v Speaker 2>We're very specific on what those symbols mean.

1018
00:44:51.559 --> 00:44:53.280
<v Speaker 1>To I thought you said that I can if I'm

1019
00:44:53.280 --> 00:44:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a Hindu, let me just let me provide something I'm

1020
00:44:54.840 --> 00:44:58.559
<v Speaker 1>a Hindu and context, you know. So remember they said

1021
00:44:58.559 --> 00:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>you could be Hindu and it mean what you want

1022
00:45:00.719 --> 00:45:03.079
<v Speaker 1>to us Indo, but they don't want to go there.

1023
00:45:03.079 --> 00:45:05.639
<v Speaker 1>If you look at masony throughout history, there was operative

1024
00:45:05.679 --> 00:45:07.920
<v Speaker 1>masonry that it became speculative. I think that the reason

1025
00:45:08.000 --> 00:45:11.280
<v Speaker 1>King Solomon's Temple is such a landmark, for lack of

1026
00:45:11.320 --> 00:45:13.599
<v Speaker 1>a better term, in freemasonry is because it's like one

1027
00:45:13.639 --> 00:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of the most famous historical examples of architecture and the

1028
00:45:16.519 --> 00:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>principles of masonry being applied from an operative standpoint. And

1029
00:45:20.039 --> 00:45:22.639
<v Speaker 1>so I think when the craft was crafted, it was

1030
00:45:22.719 --> 00:45:24.639
<v Speaker 1>used as like a setting and a frame of reference

1031
00:45:24.679 --> 00:45:29.599
<v Speaker 1>and a keystone to develop the symbolic philosophy of the fraternity. Yeah,

1032
00:45:29.639 --> 00:45:33.119
<v Speaker 1>but you keep saying philosophy to make it not religious

1033
00:45:33.119 --> 00:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and theological, when all of this is religious theological and

1034
00:45:36.000 --> 00:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>then you're removing the context and saying, well, they're just

1035
00:45:38.000 --> 00:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>really personal symbols. For example, all masonry says it is

1036
00:45:41.039 --> 00:45:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the job of masonry, as far as I'm aware, to quote,

1037
00:45:43.360 --> 00:45:45.760
<v Speaker 1>rebuild the Temple of Solomon. In you guys debate what's

1038
00:45:45.800 --> 00:45:48.760
<v Speaker 1>not true. I've never heard that, never heard that before. Correct,

1039
00:45:48.840 --> 00:45:50.519
<v Speaker 1>it is the job. Say it again.

1040
00:45:50.679 --> 00:45:51.119
<v Speaker 3>Now.

1041
00:45:51.159 --> 00:45:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Notice they immediately jumped on this to not let me

1042
00:45:54.239 --> 00:45:56.679
<v Speaker 1>finish what I was going to say. Yes, I was

1043
00:45:56.719 --> 00:46:00.800
<v Speaker 1>about to say, whether you interpret that symbolically or literally,

1044
00:46:00.880 --> 00:46:04.599
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding the Third Temple, it is the goal and the

1045
00:46:04.679 --> 00:46:07.119
<v Speaker 1>job of masonry to rebuild the Temple of Solomon. I

1046
00:46:07.159 --> 00:46:09.280
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that. Okay, So we just went to the

1047
00:46:09.719 --> 00:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>giant Masonic Monument in DC. I put this up and

1048
00:46:12.960 --> 00:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you can find this very easily, and by the way,

1049
00:46:15.000 --> 00:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>most of these Masonic authors that I have here, I'll

1050
00:46:16.519 --> 00:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>say that the job of the mason is to rebuild

1051
00:46:18.599 --> 00:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the Temple of Solomon. You got that quote? Yeah, yeah,

1052
00:46:22.280 --> 00:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So when we went to the Alexandria Monument, we got

1053
00:46:27.920 --> 00:46:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a walk through from the historian at the Alexandria Monument,

1054
00:46:34.800 --> 00:46:36.639
<v Speaker 1>and Jamie, you were there. Did the guy not say

1055
00:46:36.639 --> 00:46:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that it is the job of the mason to rebuild

1056
00:46:38.280 --> 00:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the Temple of Solomon. Thank you, because that is what

1057
00:46:42.000 --> 00:46:43.880
<v Speaker 1>he said. Now you could disagree with that. Perhaps that's

1058
00:46:43.920 --> 00:46:47.639
<v Speaker 1>something that individual masons day and it's not actually a

1059
00:46:47.719 --> 00:46:50.719
<v Speaker 1>normative teaching. So so you think it is a goal

1060
00:46:50.800 --> 00:46:55.039
<v Speaker 1>or job of masonry to physically rebuild. I thought that's

1061
00:46:55.039 --> 00:46:58.599
<v Speaker 1>what I'm asking. No, you believe that that is unknown

1062
00:46:58.800 --> 00:47:01.239
<v Speaker 1>in its turn. You may be that that is unknown

1063
00:47:01.280 --> 00:47:04.559
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what it signifies, but that spiritually and

1064
00:47:04.599 --> 00:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>morally it's crafting the temple of the individual mason to

1065
00:47:06.960 --> 00:47:08.360
<v Speaker 1>be a better person. That's that was what it was

1066
00:47:08.400 --> 00:47:10.679
<v Speaker 1>explained to us at the temple. Now you disagree with that,

1067
00:47:11.159 --> 00:47:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard that frame is rebuilding the temple now, Yeah,

1068
00:47:15.880 --> 00:47:19.199
<v Speaker 1>totally not true. You find this all throughout Masonic literature

1069
00:47:19.840 --> 00:47:22.400
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. So this really kind of pissed

1070
00:47:22.400 --> 00:47:24.400
<v Speaker 1>me off when they acted like they've never heard this.

1071
00:47:26.119 --> 00:47:30.199
<v Speaker 2>The act of improving yourself, we do take the symbolism

1072
00:47:30.280 --> 00:47:32.039
<v Speaker 2>of temple building physical.

1073
00:47:32.159 --> 00:47:32.599
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

1074
00:47:32.760 --> 00:47:35.119
<v Speaker 1>This was the point I make you notice he didn't

1075
00:47:35.199 --> 00:47:37.119
<v Speaker 1>let me finish to make it seem like I was

1076
00:47:37.159 --> 00:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that they're all trying to build the Temple in Israel,

1077
00:47:40.480 --> 00:47:43.199
<v Speaker 1>which is not what I was. What I'm playing is freemasonry,

1078
00:47:43.920 --> 00:47:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and then we use those So he just admitted the

1079
00:47:46.239 --> 00:47:47.840
<v Speaker 1>very thing that I was saying. That's why I said.

1080
00:47:47.840 --> 00:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was saying, dude, right here.

1081
00:47:50.360 --> 00:47:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, the act of improving yourself, we do take the

1082
00:47:57.000 --> 00:48:01.679
<v Speaker 2>symbolism of temple building physical. What I'm paying is it, well, freemasonry,

1083
00:48:01.760 --> 00:48:05.039
<v Speaker 2>and then we use those same working tools on building ourselves.

1084
00:48:05.440 --> 00:48:08.039
<v Speaker 2>We're not building physical temples anymore. We're building ourselves, I know,

1085
00:48:08.079 --> 00:48:09.320
<v Speaker 2>We're not rebuilding.

1086
00:48:09.480 --> 00:48:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So that's the last plane of Organs. So obviously

1087
00:48:11.800 --> 00:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that you think you're gonna go really

1088
00:48:13.440 --> 00:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>literally rebuild the temple Solomon. You're saying that thought, Well, you.

1089
00:48:16.199 --> 00:48:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Kind of made that claim and some not tonight, But

1090
00:48:18.039 --> 00:48:18.800
<v Speaker 2>in the previous.

1091
00:48:18.559 --> 00:48:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Art, no, I argue that maybe that is what you got.

1092
00:48:20.239 --> 00:48:22.800
<v Speaker 2>You basically like acted like they were some Zionist organization

1093
00:48:22.840 --> 00:48:24.360
<v Speaker 2>that wants to rebuild the Third Temple. That was your

1094
00:48:24.360 --> 00:48:27.119
<v Speaker 2>claim that you've made in previous step. I meeting to

1095
00:48:27.159 --> 00:48:30.800
<v Speaker 2>it now. But freemasonry is bound up with Judaism, you

1096
00:48:30.800 --> 00:48:32.519
<v Speaker 2>don't you don't think so it has Judaism in it

1097
00:48:32.719 --> 00:48:34.679
<v Speaker 2>bound other demming and ing up with Judaism. I mean,

1098
00:48:34.679 --> 00:48:35.960
<v Speaker 2>he's just going to fill a lot, but none of

1099
00:48:35.960 --> 00:48:36.320
<v Speaker 2>ballish it.

1100
00:48:36.400 --> 00:48:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, Christianity is not bound up with Judaism. That's false.

1101
00:48:39.039 --> 00:48:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

1102
00:48:39.440 --> 00:48:41.199
<v Speaker 2>We didn't make that claim you're saying to it. But

1103
00:48:41.239 --> 00:48:45.079
<v Speaker 2>because we did not always Christianity it's not I'm saying

1104
00:48:45.119 --> 00:48:47.920
<v Speaker 2>that just because something contains Judaism does not make it Judy.

1105
00:48:48.119 --> 00:48:50.239
<v Speaker 2>What I'm saying is, then you guys, through people like Maki,

1106
00:48:50.320 --> 00:48:52.360
<v Speaker 2>say go read the Zohar and the Talmud, and that's

1107
00:48:52.360 --> 00:48:53.920
<v Speaker 2>where you're gonna get the secrets of who God is.

1108
00:48:53.960 --> 00:48:56.679
<v Speaker 2>That's wherebeneck theology that is not ancient. I was certainly

1109
00:48:56.679 --> 00:48:59.239
<v Speaker 2>disgrae Macki in that that writing. What do you agree

1110
00:48:59.239 --> 00:49:00.679
<v Speaker 2>with the disagree that our'p to when he says to

1111
00:49:00.679 --> 00:49:01.559
<v Speaker 2>similar similar things.

1112
00:49:01.679 --> 00:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, I do. And you disagree with Harvard scholars

1113
00:49:03.880 --> 00:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>like William Green who write books about masonryes ethos being

1114
00:49:06.480 --> 00:49:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Jewish Cabbalah, Yes, I do it so notice, but it

1115
00:49:10.679 --> 00:49:12.159
<v Speaker 1>really is seemingly a thing that you can make it

1116
00:49:12.159 --> 00:49:14.280
<v Speaker 1>into whatever you want it to be. Because when we

1117
00:49:14.320 --> 00:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>bring up the actual Judaic ethos of it, and you

1118
00:49:16.400 --> 00:49:18.920
<v Speaker 1>don't find the emphasis on Christianity, except perhaps in later

1119
00:49:19.000 --> 00:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>versions of the York Right. Masonry downplays the deed of Christ,

1120
00:49:22.000 --> 00:49:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and it downplays the specifics of Christianity, which you saw

1121
00:49:24.800 --> 00:49:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Chase do when he asked me if I was a

1122
00:49:25.840 --> 00:49:27.639
<v Speaker 1>dogmatist and I only belie the Orthodox he was true.

1123
00:49:27.840 --> 00:49:30.840
<v Speaker 1>They downplayed the specifics and the absolutes, as Albert Pipe says,

1124
00:49:31.000 --> 00:49:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because their whole society is based around syncretism and the

1125
00:49:33.280 --> 00:49:35.159
<v Speaker 1>idea that all the religions are just mass of one

1126
00:49:35.239 --> 00:49:37.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimate God. But you can also be a Christian, but

1127
00:49:37.360 --> 00:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that's again like joining together with ecumenists or Freemasons. Those

1128
00:49:40.920 --> 00:49:43.880
<v Speaker 1>positions are antithetical to the absolutes of Christianity. So and

1129
00:49:43.960 --> 00:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Chase says that he believes in Jesus. What Jesus, the

1130
00:49:46.519 --> 00:49:48.920
<v Speaker 1>historical Jesus that the church teaches, or the Jesus that

1131
00:49:48.920 --> 00:49:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you've decided in the Protestant Bible, the real one, the

1132
00:49:51.760 --> 00:49:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Son of God, the Messiah. Is he the one that

1133
00:49:53.880 --> 00:49:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the Council of Nicea defines, He's the one that died

1134
00:49:56.800 --> 00:49:59.079
<v Speaker 1>on the cross and roads again, okay, but what historical

1135
00:49:59.079 --> 00:50:02.199
<v Speaker 1>body actually preserved of those teachings and put together that Bible. Matthew,

1136
00:50:02.239 --> 00:50:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark Luke and John the Yeah, and they the Bible together. No,

1137
00:50:04.960 --> 00:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I understand they didn't put the whole Bible together. Who

1138
00:50:06.880 --> 00:50:11.199
<v Speaker 1>did well? Was Constantine? Right? No?

1139
00:50:11.440 --> 00:50:13.960
<v Speaker 3>They really thought constantly put the Bible together.

1140
00:50:14.079 --> 00:50:16.519
<v Speaker 1>This part was funny, nice and council. No, he didn't put

1141
00:50:16.519 --> 00:50:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bible together. I'm sorry. No, he didn't.

1142
00:50:19.800 --> 00:50:21.719
<v Speaker 4>The depth of knowledge that most Protestants have.

1143
00:50:22.039 --> 00:50:23.400
<v Speaker 3>They don't know anything at all.

1144
00:50:23.519 --> 00:50:25.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, correct me if I'm wrong.

1145
00:50:26.039 --> 00:50:31.760
<v Speaker 7>But doesn't Pike talk about Jesus just being Adam Katamon? Uh?

1146
00:50:31.880 --> 00:50:32.440
<v Speaker 3>He could?

1147
00:50:32.639 --> 00:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean the chapter on the Church Fathers and the Trinity,

1148
00:50:35.519 --> 00:50:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he just argues that the Trinity is actually Neoplatonism, and

1149
00:50:39.320 --> 00:50:41.559
<v Speaker 1>he says it's.

1150
00:50:41.239 --> 00:50:45.440
<v Speaker 7>It's like the reference going back to reference again, like

1151
00:50:45.480 --> 00:50:48.400
<v Speaker 7>the reference of Jesus is just to Adam Kataman.

1152
00:50:49.320 --> 00:50:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Probably because if Pike's going to argue that the Trinity

1153
00:50:53.639 --> 00:50:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is not the Christian Trinity and that it's neoplatonic emanations,

1154
00:50:58.400 --> 00:51:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what he says. And he says the whole it's

1155
00:51:00.400 --> 00:51:03.920
<v Speaker 1>not a person, it's just the world soul, then that

1156
00:51:03.960 --> 00:51:05.119
<v Speaker 1>would deny the deed of Christ.

1157
00:51:05.119 --> 00:51:11.519
<v Speaker 4>So yes, you know what it's called what's what refer information? Referation?

1158
00:51:13.199 --> 00:51:14.280
<v Speaker 3>What is that a joke?

1159
00:51:15.199 --> 00:51:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Take it easy, man, I'm sorry.

1160
00:51:20.960 --> 00:51:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing you like Chase did to me when I

1161
00:51:22.760 --> 00:51:24.840
<v Speaker 1>made the joke, and he's like, I don't have a response.

1162
00:51:27.119 --> 00:51:28.719
<v Speaker 3>He didn't. He didn't want to laugh at my joke.

1163
00:51:29.360 --> 00:51:34.599
<v Speaker 1>The Bible together, just a suggestion, Yeah, beat it up.

1164
00:51:35.880 --> 00:51:36.639
<v Speaker 3>It is sped up.

1165
00:51:37.679 --> 00:51:42.079
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I mean I could try faster, but it might

1166
00:51:42.119 --> 00:51:43.199
<v Speaker 1>sound like chipmunks.

1167
00:51:43.840 --> 00:51:44.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh man.

1168
00:51:44.400 --> 00:51:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Like so they were like, well, the other thing too,

1169
00:51:48.880 --> 00:51:51.199
<v Speaker 1>is like this got really heated, and I think they

1170
00:51:51.280 --> 00:51:55.440
<v Speaker 1>evened out the vocal stuff. And they also there's no

1171
00:51:55.559 --> 00:51:57.880
<v Speaker 1>crowd at all, Like the crowd was making noises and

1172
00:51:57.960 --> 00:52:00.519
<v Speaker 1>laughing this, so this is this is like evened out

1173
00:52:00.519 --> 00:52:03.079
<v Speaker 1>audio wise. I think everybody to come together and identify

1174
00:52:03.119 --> 00:52:05.320
<v Speaker 1>what's Canada, what isn't and no, okay, forgive me tell me.

1175
00:52:07.280 --> 00:52:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys believe the Bible, right, Like, what

1176
00:52:09.360 --> 00:52:11.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of Christianity is it that the Bible teaches? That

1177
00:52:11.639 --> 00:52:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is your definition of what Christianity is that masonry is

1178
00:52:13.440 --> 00:52:15.800
<v Speaker 1>compatible with, well, master is compatible with.

1179
00:52:17.719 --> 00:52:22.239
<v Speaker 2>Again, masonry is not making dogmatic claims about Christianity.

1180
00:52:21.719 --> 00:52:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But it is we've seen that in this debate. What

1181
00:52:23.920 --> 00:52:26.280
<v Speaker 1>do you mean? What do I mean? Yeah? When when

1182
00:52:26.320 --> 00:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>does Masony make dogmatic claims about Jesus Christ or Christianity. Well,

1183
00:52:29.840 --> 00:52:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the belief that you can be a member of the

1184
00:52:32.719 --> 00:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>society just by believing in a generic theism is antithetical

1185
00:52:36.440 --> 00:52:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to Jesus in John fourteen six that I'm the way

1186
00:52:38.360 --> 00:52:40.199
<v Speaker 1>the truth in the life. So least say generic feism.

1187
00:52:40.239 --> 00:52:42.719
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean you also believe it a supreme

1188
00:52:42.760 --> 00:52:45.960
<v Speaker 1>being being orgmentonic touching that there's just a supreme being. Okay,

1189
00:52:46.079 --> 00:52:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not how do we identify what the supreme being is?

1190
00:52:48.519 --> 00:52:50.679
<v Speaker 1>That's really not that's amazing point. He doesn't involve thisself

1191
00:52:50.719 --> 00:52:53.360
<v Speaker 1>as as leo it up to the individual exactly. That's

1192
00:52:53.400 --> 00:52:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the point that that's antithetical too, the way that Christianity

1193
00:52:56.400 --> 00:52:59.159
<v Speaker 1>defines who God is, that's the way it answer makes

1194
00:52:59.199 --> 00:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>no claims is it is the point It would be

1195
00:53:01.920 --> 00:53:04.480
<v Speaker 1>antithetical if Masonry said that all religions are equal they

1196
00:53:04.519 --> 00:53:05.719
<v Speaker 1>all teach the same thing.

1197
00:53:05.840 --> 00:53:08.280
<v Speaker 2>That my belief in Christianity that you know, I worship

1198
00:53:08.360 --> 00:53:10.079
<v Speaker 2>the same God as the Muslim, that would be a

1199
00:53:10.159 --> 00:53:12.440
<v Speaker 2>generic theism that you believe worship the same God.

1200
00:53:13.239 --> 00:53:14.119
<v Speaker 3>The same God as Muslims.

1201
00:53:14.159 --> 00:53:16.559
<v Speaker 1>It's a Muslim, I don't, Yes, you do, No, I don't. Yes,

1202
00:53:16.880 --> 00:53:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Muslim your society or Mason society accepts Muslims as monotheists

1203
00:53:21.760 --> 00:53:24.519
<v Speaker 1>and part of your society. So you believe that you

1204
00:53:24.559 --> 00:53:26.639
<v Speaker 1>could be a Christian and your theology doesn't play into

1205
00:53:26.639 --> 00:53:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the Masonic order and its teachings. And that's why it's

1206
00:53:28.679 --> 00:53:30.679
<v Speaker 1>double minded and double think. That's the point. I think

1207
00:53:30.719 --> 00:53:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just a Grossmith's understanding. Does Masonry teach the Muslims

1208
00:53:33.480 --> 00:53:35.519
<v Speaker 1>worship the same God? Masy doesn't take a claim, It

1209
00:53:35.519 --> 00:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make a claim with that. It just says that

1210
00:53:36.800 --> 00:53:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Muslims are if it allows Muslims, and it's it's it's

1211
00:53:39.079 --> 00:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>acquiescing to that. That's not necessarily nor why we said

1212
00:53:42.960 --> 00:53:44.679
<v Speaker 1>a supreme Being? Is it the same supreme Being? Yeah,

1213
00:53:44.679 --> 00:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I understand, No, we don't. We don't make the claim

1214
00:53:46.440 --> 00:53:49.039
<v Speaker 1>that you have it is all the same supreme being. Correct.

1215
00:53:49.639 --> 00:53:52.000
<v Speaker 1>We do not make the claim that that everybody, every

1216
00:53:52.199 --> 00:53:56.159
<v Speaker 1>every religion, supreme Being is the truth. Everyone is arousland

1217
00:53:56.239 --> 00:53:59.719
<v Speaker 1>does a Muslim worship the same postentially mussy? Remember? Should

1218
00:53:59.719 --> 00:54:01.199
<v Speaker 1>I do not believe that on those worship I'm not

1219
00:54:01.199 --> 00:54:03.920
<v Speaker 1>asking you. Does must Masonry say and allow for Muslims

1220
00:54:03.960 --> 00:54:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to become members and asked allow? So making allowing is

1221
00:54:07.039 --> 00:54:10.079
<v Speaker 1>different from making your claim as to the authenticity.

1222
00:54:09.800 --> 00:54:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Who's playing word games now come on or the.

1223
00:54:12.480 --> 00:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Truth they're allowing it. It would be on the basis

1224
00:54:14.440 --> 00:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that they now in this ass of all.

1225
00:54:16.000 --> 00:54:18.360
<v Speaker 1>The only reason that freemasonry requires a belief in a

1226
00:54:18.400 --> 00:54:20.280
<v Speaker 1>supreme being is so that when you take your oaths,

1227
00:54:20.400 --> 00:54:22.119
<v Speaker 1>there's reason to believe that you feel that you're held

1228
00:54:22.119 --> 00:54:23.800
<v Speaker 1>accountable to your supreme beings. So we're not going to

1229
00:54:23.920 --> 00:54:26.960
<v Speaker 1>try to convince a Muslim to swear an oath to

1230
00:54:27.000 --> 00:54:28.639
<v Speaker 1>a God that he doesn't believe in, because we understand

1231
00:54:28.639 --> 00:54:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that he won't feel held accountable to to keep the oath.

1232
00:54:32.559 --> 00:54:34.440
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is, look, if you believe so, if

1233
00:54:34.440 --> 00:54:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you believe in God and Jesus Christ, and you're a

1234
00:54:36.239 --> 00:54:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Christian and you take an oath on a Bible instead

1235
00:54:38.320 --> 00:54:40.039
<v Speaker 1>of whatever your holy book is, and that's because you

1236
00:54:40.119 --> 00:54:41.679
<v Speaker 1>believe that you'll be held accountable for the oath that

1237
00:54:41.679 --> 00:54:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you swear to your own God. If it's an accountability,

1238
00:54:44.400 --> 00:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe that I am out. If I believe that

1239
00:54:46.519 --> 00:54:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I am God and I am the supreme Being? Can

1240
00:54:48.039 --> 00:54:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I become a Mason? I've never even been presented with

1241
00:54:50.360 --> 00:54:53.119
<v Speaker 1>that question. Doesn't matter. It's a theoretical question that's proving

1242
00:54:53.119 --> 00:54:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a point about an argument. I'm not actually saying that

1243
00:54:54.880 --> 00:54:57.239
<v Speaker 1>if somebody believes that they are God. I even note,

1244
00:54:57.559 --> 00:55:00.599
<v Speaker 1>there's no way that we get in what they wouldn't

1245
00:55:00.599 --> 00:55:03.039
<v Speaker 1>be accepted. They would not No, I mean, I don't

1246
00:55:03.039 --> 00:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>know if it's technically against the rules, but there would

1247
00:55:04.880 --> 00:55:06.159
<v Speaker 1>never be an instance in which that person would be

1248
00:55:06.239 --> 00:55:06.800
<v Speaker 1>leaving into a lot of.

1249
00:55:06.800 --> 00:55:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Supering being to him. All men are accountable, I don't know.

1250
00:55:09.000 --> 00:55:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Are you accountable to yourself? Yeah, because you are the

1251
00:55:11.159 --> 00:55:12.960
<v Speaker 2>supreme Being? I don't know, band you can't be insane?

1252
00:55:13.440 --> 00:55:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, beyond that, I guess still like crazy people

1253
00:55:15.760 --> 00:55:16.199
<v Speaker 2>in are trying.

1254
00:55:16.239 --> 00:55:16.360
<v Speaker 4>You know.

1255
00:55:16.639 --> 00:55:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm illustrating a point that every time you appeal to

1256
00:55:18.800 --> 00:55:21.639
<v Speaker 1>supreme Being, it is sufficiently vague and generic. Heainst generic

1257
00:55:21.679 --> 00:55:25.280
<v Speaker 1>theism to allow for anything it appears. But then as

1258
00:55:25.360 --> 00:55:28.559
<v Speaker 1>we nail it down, it gets hyper specified and qualified

1259
00:55:28.559 --> 00:55:30.519
<v Speaker 1>about all of the things that don't count and all

1260
00:55:30.559 --> 00:55:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that do count, which demonstrates the point that

1261
00:55:33.079 --> 00:55:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a theology and a dogma, and you're not

1262
00:55:36.480 --> 00:55:39.239
<v Speaker 1>consistent with the other claims that you've made. That's the point.

1263
00:55:39.320 --> 00:55:42.239
<v Speaker 1>So how is it compatible with Christianity to be in

1264
00:55:42.320 --> 00:55:47.159
<v Speaker 1>a lodge together with totally different demonic positions, Like because

1265
00:55:47.159 --> 00:55:49.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a secular organization, it's not a religious How is

1266
00:55:49.280 --> 00:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it secular when you've adopted all these religious symbols and imagery.

1267
00:55:52.159 --> 00:55:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Just because you're presenting people with religious ideas in different

1268
00:55:55.400 --> 00:55:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ancient mysteries or whatever, doesn't mean that you're actually again

1269
00:55:58.199 --> 00:56:01.119
<v Speaker 1>you see, how like they just keep going back and

1270
00:56:01.239 --> 00:56:04.840
<v Speaker 1>forth to uh, yeah, fine, we have all these religious

1271
00:56:05.599 --> 00:56:08.440
<v Speaker 1>positions that you have to affirm, but it's not religious.

1272
00:56:09.159 --> 00:56:12.199
<v Speaker 3>It's like the whole thing is just just double.

1273
00:56:11.960 --> 00:56:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Mount advocates and the belief in them. Now, you're dishonest

1274
00:56:14.320 --> 00:56:16.320
<v Speaker 1>because you said it's secular at the same time as

1275
00:56:16.320 --> 00:56:18.920
<v Speaker 1>saying that there are theological requirements to get in or

1276
00:56:18.960 --> 00:56:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Reversity of California and you engage in religious studies, it's

1277
00:56:21.079 --> 00:56:23.159
<v Speaker 1>still a secular program even though you're said a religod

1278
00:56:23.400 --> 00:56:25.599
<v Speaker 1>to believe in God quote unquote to get into the program,

1279
00:56:25.840 --> 00:56:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you require a belief in God, and then you have

1280
00:56:27.800 --> 00:56:31.239
<v Speaker 1>a generic God that's a contradiction. How is it not theological?

1281
00:56:31.679 --> 00:56:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Because the only reason that basically requires a belief in

1282
00:56:35.039 --> 00:56:37.400
<v Speaker 1>God is for the sake of knowing that we can

1283
00:56:37.480 --> 00:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>trust the oaths that people take because they feel held

1284
00:56:39.719 --> 00:56:41.760
<v Speaker 1>accountable to their higher power. Also, and why does it

1285
00:56:41.880 --> 00:56:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Why can't I be accountable to myself as God? I

1286
00:56:45.239 --> 00:56:47.039
<v Speaker 1>would also argue that beyond what they said, and not

1287
00:56:47.159 --> 00:56:51.239
<v Speaker 1>disagreeing with that, but just in addition to that, they

1288
00:56:51.360 --> 00:56:53.679
<v Speaker 1>think that I'm being silly and just saying coming out

1289
00:56:53.719 --> 00:56:56.920
<v Speaker 1>with crazy. Now, I'm illustrating a point that every time

1290
00:56:57.000 --> 00:57:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I come up with some fringe religious position, whether it's Theostic,

1291
00:57:00.400 --> 00:57:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Satanism or Gnosticism, or I'm my own God, I'm illustrating

1292
00:57:04.199 --> 00:57:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to them that they have all of these qualifications that

1293
00:57:07.719 --> 00:57:11.599
<v Speaker 1>are beyond just one dogma. It's a very simple point,

1294
00:57:11.760 --> 00:57:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know why they can't see this. I

1295
00:57:14.519 --> 00:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>think eventually they do, because this guy's about to make

1296
00:57:16.360 --> 00:57:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a big trip up here soon.

1297
00:57:17.800 --> 00:57:21.360
<v Speaker 2>The teachings, the principles not a theology, just I don't

1298
00:57:21.400 --> 00:57:23.119
<v Speaker 2>know how else to say it. Did you do you

1299
00:57:23.199 --> 00:57:25.480
<v Speaker 2>believe that there are teachings and doctrines that aren't are

1300
00:57:25.519 --> 00:57:26.679
<v Speaker 2>not theology.

1301
00:57:27.079 --> 00:57:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Like Are you serious right now? Are you serious?

1302
00:57:30.119 --> 00:57:30.480
<v Speaker 8>Go for it?

1303
00:57:30.760 --> 00:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Go for it. Okay, So you made a bunch of

1304
00:57:34.400 --> 00:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>theological claims. Okay, what what? What are the bunch of

1305
00:57:37.400 --> 00:57:40.119
<v Speaker 1>theological things that you can't be in the society? Believe

1306
00:57:40.159 --> 00:57:42.719
<v Speaker 1>this is about ship requirements. You can't be in the

1307
00:57:42.760 --> 00:57:44.920
<v Speaker 1>society if you believe this is this about the deity

1308
00:57:45.000 --> 00:57:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in question? Those are theological claims and assertions. So you

1309
00:57:48.559 --> 00:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have a vast theology. Do you not understand this? This

1310
00:57:51.480 --> 00:57:52.519
<v Speaker 1>is a very simple Are you serious?

1311
00:57:52.840 --> 00:57:52.880
<v Speaker 4>No?

1312
00:57:53.000 --> 00:57:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. When you put the word fastin, did

1313
00:57:54.679 --> 00:57:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you not give me a whole bunch of people that

1314
00:57:56.480 --> 00:57:58.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't count, such as a Satanist and such as myself

1315
00:57:58.760 --> 00:58:00.920
<v Speaker 1>believe I'm God or something like that, said those theologies

1316
00:58:00.920 --> 00:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>don't count. I would say that those people wouldn't get

1317
00:58:02.840 --> 00:58:07.079
<v Speaker 1>into a lodge. Yeah, thank you. So you have theological requirements.

1318
00:58:08.519 --> 00:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the point that it's a like a vote by

1319
00:58:10.840 --> 00:58:12.599
<v Speaker 1>the people and they would always vote that out, or

1320
00:58:12.639 --> 00:58:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that there's a specific crele. Do I feel like I'm

1321
00:58:15.000 --> 00:58:17.719
<v Speaker 1>talking to children or Muslims? Look at me, holding my

1322
00:58:17.840 --> 00:58:20.840
<v Speaker 1>hands in my face. It's like, how do you not

1323
00:58:20.960 --> 00:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>get this point right?

1324
00:58:22.119 --> 00:58:25.000
<v Speaker 3>It's like not. This is not a difficult point.

1325
00:58:26.920 --> 00:58:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Do you look like when you were talking to the Bara.

1326
00:58:32.320 --> 00:58:35.599
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that they're not getting the point on

1327
00:58:35.719 --> 00:58:38.800
<v Speaker 1>purpose here, because this would undo the whole thing. You know,

1328
00:58:38.880 --> 00:58:40.039
<v Speaker 1>this is now you're going to be accepted into a

1329
00:58:40.079 --> 00:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>regular parity. It's it's it's it's my.

1330
00:58:42.039 --> 00:58:42.719
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, Risen.

1331
00:58:44.599 --> 00:58:46.639
<v Speaker 5>I was gonna say what you just said, but they can't.

1332
00:58:47.159 --> 00:58:49.079
<v Speaker 5>They can't grasp the point because if they did, it's

1333
00:58:49.119 --> 00:58:51.360
<v Speaker 5>over right. So they have to pretend they don't get

1334
00:58:51.400 --> 00:58:53.760
<v Speaker 5>the point, or convince themselves that they don't get a

1335
00:58:53.880 --> 00:58:57.039
<v Speaker 5>point to keep the think going as long as they can't,

1336
00:58:57.239 --> 00:59:00.760
<v Speaker 5>and then that probably increases their internal tension that led

1337
00:59:00.760 --> 00:59:03.320
<v Speaker 5>to them blown up on you a little bit later.

1338
00:59:03.440 --> 00:59:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's nature an exclusive organization. I actually think

1339
00:59:07.800 --> 00:59:09.800
<v Speaker 1>DJ I'm not lying because there's a lot of people

1340
00:59:09.840 --> 00:59:11.599
<v Speaker 1>over there. This is probably wait, at least over one

1341
00:59:11.679 --> 00:59:13.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred people, and that's not a lot. But I mean

1342
00:59:14.199 --> 00:59:16.559
<v Speaker 1>it was really heated, and it doesn't give the impression

1343
00:59:16.559 --> 00:59:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that it was that heated from this because I think

1344
00:59:17.960 --> 00:59:20.079
<v Speaker 1>they even know the voices, and they've they've clipped some

1345
00:59:20.159 --> 00:59:22.039
<v Speaker 1>of the points to where we got really loud.

1346
00:59:21.960 --> 00:59:23.960
<v Speaker 2>And whether it's a written rule or not. I'm not

1347
00:59:24.039 --> 00:59:25.360
<v Speaker 2>going to let a guy in that thinks he's.

1348
00:59:25.239 --> 00:59:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Got thank you. So that proves my point that you

1349
00:59:28.559 --> 00:59:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have theological dogmatic positions. When you say that there's only

1350
00:59:31.840 --> 00:59:34.239
<v Speaker 1>one dogma, that's not actually the case. There are all

1351
00:59:34.320 --> 00:59:38.239
<v Speaker 1>these theological necessities that you have that exclude all of

1352
00:59:38.320 --> 00:59:40.559
<v Speaker 1>these other types of positions. That's the point. So it's

1353
00:59:40.599 --> 00:59:43.639
<v Speaker 1>not just a fraternity, it's not like a graduate program

1354
00:59:43.840 --> 00:59:47.159
<v Speaker 1>or like AA. That's the point. Well, I see what

1355
00:59:47.239 --> 00:59:49.079
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to say. I would just argue that I

1356
00:59:49.119 --> 00:59:50.440
<v Speaker 1>think there's a difference and we should I think we

1357
00:59:50.480 --> 00:59:54.519
<v Speaker 1>should define this difference between official, written requirements of what

1358
00:59:54.639 --> 00:59:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it means to be a part of an organization and

1359
00:59:56.360 --> 00:59:56.960
<v Speaker 1>then the call.

1360
00:59:56.920 --> 00:59:58.760
<v Speaker 3>To just redefine remove the goal posts.

1361
00:59:58.760 --> 01:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Again, sure that is create as a conglomeration or a

1362
01:00:01.920 --> 01:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>combination of the people who are actually a part of

1363
01:00:04.119 --> 01:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that organization. What does that tot? Yeah, I think he

1364
01:00:06.559 --> 01:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>removed the laughter right and DJ unless he personally added

1365
01:00:12.480 --> 01:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>me to this, he didn't even link me.

1366
01:00:20.599 --> 01:00:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Uh so, yeah, that's kind of weak.

1367
01:00:25.599 --> 01:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm trying to say is, what I'm trying

1368
01:00:26.960 --> 01:00:29.079
<v Speaker 1>to say is masonry that may not officially make a

1369
01:00:29.159 --> 01:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>claim regarding the theological truth of Satanism, but because of

1370
01:00:34.519 --> 01:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the composition of the organization, it's impossible that a Satanist

1371
01:00:37.280 --> 01:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>would ever get in, because then you're making a theological

1372
01:00:39.320 --> 01:00:41.639
<v Speaker 1>claim about who is and isn't allowed. Well, certainly, whenever

1373
01:00:41.639 --> 01:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>you vote on whether or not you can emit somebody

1374
01:00:43.199 --> 01:00:45.599
<v Speaker 1>into a lodge, you're making a decision based off whatever

1375
01:00:45.719 --> 01:00:47.679
<v Speaker 1>arbitrary sentiments or feelings that you have as an individual,

1376
01:00:47.679 --> 01:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and that you have a dogma that a specific type

1377
01:00:49.519 --> 01:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of feeolo. It doesn't even have to necessarily be based

1378
01:00:51.320 --> 01:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>on the dogma of freemasonry. I could just blackball somebody

1379
01:00:53.280 --> 01:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>because I don't like him. Okay, that's an even better

1380
01:00:55.079 --> 01:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>argument for my case, because now you're admitting that it's

1381
01:00:56.880 --> 01:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not just the theology, it's also the practical concerns that

1382
01:00:58.840 --> 01:01:01.159
<v Speaker 1>allow you to jack people. So yeah, that's not that

1383
01:01:01.480 --> 01:01:03.719
<v Speaker 1>is ubut. I'm not making a decision to blackball somebody

1384
01:01:03.760 --> 01:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>based off of the official position of the fraternity. I'm

1385
01:01:05.480 --> 01:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>making the position of the decision to blackballs somebody based

1386
01:01:07.679 --> 01:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>off of just personal preference. But it's still a theological

1387
01:01:10.880 --> 01:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>personal preference. So that just argues in paper and what

1388
01:01:12.480 --> 01:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm arguing not even necessarily. I could totally agree with

1389
01:01:14.320 --> 01:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody's theology, but if I dislike them, I can just

1390
01:01:15.960 --> 01:01:17.519
<v Speaker 1>blackball them. If somebody is a Satanist like and then

1391
01:01:17.559 --> 01:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I would satan then it would just be irrelevant to

1392
01:01:19.440 --> 01:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the question of whether Freemasonry has theological requirements for membership.

1393
01:01:23.639 --> 01:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>The only theological requirement for membership is that you believe

1394
01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in a supreme being. That is not true, which we

1395
01:01:27.920 --> 01:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>have seen in the first hour when you explicate that

1396
01:01:29.920 --> 01:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't be a Satanist, you can't believe you're your

1397
01:01:31.400 --> 01:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>own God, and a host of other things that would

1398
01:01:32.880 --> 01:01:35.159
<v Speaker 1>exclude you. Always so you're that's always said was that

1399
01:01:35.199 --> 01:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>you would never get in. I mean, you could technically

1400
01:01:37.719 --> 01:01:39.519
<v Speaker 1>be a Satanist and a congressman. They probably half of

1401
01:01:39.559 --> 01:01:42.159
<v Speaker 1>them are, but nobody would actually vote for you to

1402
01:01:42.199 --> 01:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sit outouwardly spoken to Satanists to be a congressman. Are

1403
01:01:44.400 --> 01:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys just like I don't understand, like you have

1404
01:01:46.440 --> 01:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>theological requirements that exclude you. Thus you have dogmatic things

1405
01:01:51.000 --> 01:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that you hold to. This is a very corglicating like that.

1406
01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:56.039
<v Speaker 1>The explicit requirement is a belief in a supreme being.

1407
01:01:56.239 --> 01:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>The practical requirements are complicated, and it depends on whichever

1408
01:01:58.519 --> 01:02:00.119
<v Speaker 1>lodge you're trying to join. I mean, if I was

1409
01:02:00.159 --> 01:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in the lodgeical liking, you're not going to get in.

1410
01:02:01.360 --> 01:02:02.599
<v Speaker 1>It's a role. Now I don't, I don't. I don't

1411
01:02:02.599 --> 01:02:05.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's irrelevant. You said a specific theological requirement of

1412
01:02:05.239 --> 01:02:07.079
<v Speaker 1>a supreme being, and then I ask you who is that?

1413
01:02:07.199 --> 01:02:07.559
<v Speaker 4>What is that?

1414
01:02:07.679 --> 01:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>What's the things that exclude me from that? And you

1415
01:02:09.440 --> 01:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>list all of these things? Yeah, right, he listed all

1416
01:02:11.239 --> 01:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>those based off of the preference of any lodge. There's

1417
01:02:12.920 --> 01:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>no way in the culture of free missionry that a

1418
01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>satans would get accepted in any lodge, regardless of whether

1419
01:02:17.480 --> 01:02:19.199
<v Speaker 1>or not they technically would be allowed, just as there's

1420
01:02:19.199 --> 01:02:21.199
<v Speaker 1>no way that a Satanist would be voted into Congress,

1421
01:02:21.360 --> 01:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the fact that they're technically allowed to be

1422
01:02:23.280 --> 01:02:26.559
<v Speaker 1>a Satanist in Congress. You changed what the requirement was

1423
01:02:26.679 --> 01:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to your personal statements and ideas about what whether you

1424
01:02:29.360 --> 01:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>want a Mason or whether you want a Satanist in

1425
01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a lodge. When the question was do you have requirements

1426
01:02:33.519 --> 01:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>about a type of supreme being?

1427
01:02:35.119 --> 01:02:35.400
<v Speaker 4>And you do.

1428
01:02:35.840 --> 01:02:39.119
<v Speaker 1>We don't. We don't specifically have requirements you do because

1429
01:02:39.119 --> 01:02:41.239
<v Speaker 1>you said a you said, the theology of a Satanis

1430
01:02:41.280 --> 01:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is incompatible with the theology of Masonry. That's certainly my

1431
01:02:43.480 --> 01:02:46.119
<v Speaker 1>personal belief. But the notice he keeps shifting back and

1432
01:02:46.239 --> 01:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>forth being sauce between the Masonic positions requirements in his

1433
01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>own personal requirements.

1434
01:02:53.360 --> 01:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>That wasn't.

1435
01:02:53.840 --> 01:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The debate is whether Freemasonry allows and should allow on

1436
01:02:59.000 --> 01:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>the basis of what they say about Supreme being a

1437
01:03:01.119 --> 01:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Satanist and that it's saing consistent and he keeps.

1438
01:03:03.159 --> 01:03:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Going to well, I wouldn't want it totally irrelevant to debate, dude.

1439
01:03:06.880 --> 01:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say the theology of Freemasery said the principles

1440
01:03:08.920 --> 01:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and values of freemas or a epitheology. Nothing antithetical between

1441
01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>a Satanist and free and a Freemason theologically. I believe

1442
01:03:14.760 --> 01:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that there is something antithetical between a Satanist and a

1443
01:03:16.800 --> 01:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Freemason philosophically, and that is my personal belief, which I think.

1444
01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:21.199
<v Speaker 1>But I was using a theistic.

1445
01:03:20.960 --> 01:03:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Satanist, so I'm still unaware of these Satanists that think

1446
01:03:23.480 --> 01:03:24.960
<v Speaker 2>that he is the Supreme being.

1447
01:03:25.199 --> 01:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Theistic Satanists believe that. Okay, it doesn't matter whether even

1448
01:03:28.400 --> 01:03:30.159
<v Speaker 1>if there weren't any I get theoretically propose that as

1449
01:03:30.199 --> 01:03:32.599
<v Speaker 1>a thing. Imagine you can't come up with every hypothetical

1450
01:03:32.719 --> 01:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>you want. But well, that's why they're useful for debates,

1451
01:03:34.679 --> 01:03:36.599
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't matter whether they exists and how you

1452
01:03:36.639 --> 01:03:40.039
<v Speaker 1>do debates bro So again, the point, as Obo see,

1453
01:03:40.239 --> 01:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is that when we say exactly what they mean by

1454
01:03:42.400 --> 01:03:45.199
<v Speaker 1>the supreme being, they have all these qualifications and these criteria,

1455
01:03:45.239 --> 01:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and then Chase shifts it to say, that's my personal

1456
01:03:47.360 --> 01:03:49.039
<v Speaker 1>ethical reason why I don't want a Satanist in here,

1457
01:03:49.400 --> 01:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>shifting away from what the actual question is, which is

1458
01:03:51.559 --> 01:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>does Masonry have a dogma? They admitted, yes, it's just

1459
01:03:53.920 --> 01:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a supreme being, but then we find out in practice

1460
01:03:56.320 --> 01:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and in reality it's not just a supreme being because

1461
01:03:58.880 --> 01:04:00.719
<v Speaker 1>what do you even know what that is? We're not. Again,

1462
01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like over and over and over. Having a dogma,

1463
01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:07.199
<v Speaker 1>or specifically having the dogma of a belief in a

1464
01:04:07.239 --> 01:04:09.199
<v Speaker 1>supreme being, is in any way, shape or form incompatible

1465
01:04:09.239 --> 01:04:12.039
<v Speaker 1>with Christianity, because that's one of the dogmas of Christianity too,

1466
01:04:12.079 --> 01:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that you must believe in a supreme being. It's called

1467
01:04:13.519 --> 01:04:16.079
<v Speaker 1>a word concept fallacy. It's called the quantifier shift fallacy.

1468
01:04:16.159 --> 01:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Let me give an example really quick. I have one mother,

1469
01:04:18.559 --> 01:04:20.679
<v Speaker 1>You have one mother. You have one mother. Therefore we

1470
01:04:20.800 --> 01:04:23.559
<v Speaker 1>all have the same mother. That's a fallacy because just

1471
01:04:23.599 --> 01:04:26.079
<v Speaker 1>because they're all having one as they're referent, it doesn't

1472
01:04:26.079 --> 01:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>mean they're the same. So likewise, because all the religions

1473
01:04:28.400 --> 01:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>believe in a God, it doesn't mean it's the same God. Yeah,

1474
01:04:30.599 --> 01:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>so you don't claim that it is right, but freemasiety,

1475
01:04:33.159 --> 01:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, I see what you're saying, and I

1476
01:04:34.400 --> 01:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>understand your point. You're right, but freemasonry does not make

1477
01:04:37.039 --> 01:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a claim as to which supreme being is the real

1478
01:04:40.039 --> 01:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>true supreme being. Then it's meant to be ambiguous so

1479
01:04:42.400 --> 01:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that all faith could connect. It's meant to be ambiguous,

1480
01:04:45.440 --> 01:04:47.679
<v Speaker 1>and thank you, that was the point for frick an

1481
01:04:47.760 --> 01:04:50.119
<v Speaker 1>hour and a half. It was meant to be ambiguous

1482
01:04:50.159 --> 01:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>so all the faiths can join. But remember a minute ago,

1483
01:04:53.079 --> 01:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>it's not ambiguous. We don't allow certain bad people. This

1484
01:04:57.280 --> 01:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>is the whole point. They don't understand. They keep it

1485
01:05:00.920 --> 01:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>my point about it being a contradiction, and you turn

1486
01:05:04.519 --> 01:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>around and you specify who gets in and who doesn't

1487
01:05:06.760 --> 01:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>get in based on the theology. That's the whole argument. No,

1488
01:05:08.880 --> 01:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't, in fact solicitly denied the term theology. And

1489
01:05:11.519 --> 01:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>what I explicitly stated, how is that there's no way

1490
01:05:13.800 --> 01:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that a Satanist would get into a lodge because in

1491
01:05:15.519 --> 01:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>any given lodge that person would death certainly be blackballed

1492
01:05:18.480 --> 01:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>by one of the members. Dude, do you not understand

1493
01:05:20.320 --> 01:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the argument? I'm not asking you do Mason's like Satanists.

1494
01:05:23.199 --> 01:05:26.519
<v Speaker 1>The question is the point is that the argument demonstrates

1495
01:05:26.599 --> 01:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>that supreme Being is sufficiently vague as to not mean anything,

1496
01:05:30.360 --> 01:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and your arbitrary when you start to say who doesn't

1497
01:05:32.440 --> 01:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>get in because those are theological assertions? That's the argument

1498
01:05:34.960 --> 01:05:37.119
<v Speaker 1>percent agree with you on. That is it took an

1499
01:05:37.159 --> 01:05:39.239
<v Speaker 1>hour and a half again to come back to this

1500
01:05:39.400 --> 01:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>same obvious argument, and he every time shifts it to

1501
01:05:44.119 --> 01:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>saying we don't like Satanists do.

1502
01:05:47.039 --> 01:05:50.159
<v Speaker 3>That's not I don't. It's not the question. The question

1503
01:05:50.400 --> 01:05:52.119
<v Speaker 3>is it's a test.

1504
01:05:52.000 --> 01:05:57.079
<v Speaker 1>Case that's used like possible world's arguments. They're not saying

1505
01:05:57.159 --> 01:06:01.519
<v Speaker 1>the possible worlds are real multi versus their examples to

1506
01:06:01.639 --> 01:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>illustrate the logical inconsistency and saying that Freemasonry has a

1507
01:06:06.360 --> 01:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>dogma that you have to believe in a supreme being.

1508
01:06:08.880 --> 01:06:12.599
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what if the supreme Being is Satan? Oh, that

1509
01:06:12.719 --> 01:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>doesn't count.

1510
01:06:14.559 --> 01:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Why because of this, this, this, this, this, and all

1511
01:06:17.039 --> 01:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the other qualifications are theological positions?

1512
01:06:20.800 --> 01:06:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Well no, but it's because we don't like you personally.

1513
01:06:23.679 --> 01:06:26.239
<v Speaker 1>How could it be I don't like you personally when

1514
01:06:26.440 --> 01:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>the question is what's the theological contradiction between that being

1515
01:06:31.119 --> 01:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>my personal higher supreme being? So they keep shifting it

1516
01:06:34.639 --> 01:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>over to we don't we wouldn't let a Satanist in?

1517
01:06:37.639 --> 01:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Not asking you would you let a Satanist in? I'm

1518
01:06:39.480 --> 01:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>asking on what basis is a Satanist not allowed in?

1519
01:06:42.840 --> 01:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>If the supreme Being is himself or Satan? And they

1520
01:06:47.480 --> 01:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>just can't compute that what you just said. I just

1521
01:06:49.960 --> 01:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>don't understand the point, Like, I don't see how you

1522
01:06:52.079 --> 01:06:53.679
<v Speaker 1>don't have one dogma and there's no this thing as

1523
01:06:53.719 --> 01:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>in eerth is And that's the point. We don't have

1524
01:06:55.079 --> 01:06:57.079
<v Speaker 1>a dogma. We don't have one dogma. Is that what

1525
01:06:57.119 --> 01:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you're saying? Yes, then how is that incompatible with Christianity?

1526
01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:02.119
<v Speaker 1>If there's no dogma to be in conflict with Christianity?

1527
01:07:03.400 --> 01:07:05.119
<v Speaker 1>The point is that you claim to not have a dogma,

1528
01:07:05.159 --> 01:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but you actually have a whole bunch. That's what you're saying.

1529
01:07:06.800 --> 01:07:09.559
<v Speaker 1>We have a dogma, now, yeah, it's a condrediction. Yeah,

1530
01:07:09.599 --> 01:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and the dogma is that we require the belief in

1531
01:07:11.920 --> 01:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a supreme being. And that is right more than Christianity

1532
01:07:14.400 --> 01:07:16.039
<v Speaker 1>requires a belief in a supreme being too. And it's

1533
01:07:16.079 --> 01:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>totally doatible with Freemasonry for you to believe that's suprevicre

1534
01:07:18.760 --> 01:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>He went back to the quantifier shift fallacy. Because there's

1535
01:07:20.880 --> 01:07:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a supreme being, then it's a supreme being. What's the

1536
01:07:22.840 --> 01:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>pro and it is the God of Jesus Christ's Christianity.

1537
01:07:25.440 --> 01:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Being is the Triune God. It is not generic

1538
01:07:29.039 --> 01:07:31.519
<v Speaker 1>theism that allows a Muslim and Hinder diet sample. Say, oh,

1539
01:07:31.559 --> 01:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>where in Freemasonry does it say that the Triune God

1540
01:07:33.880 --> 01:07:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is not the supreme Being? Yes, it is, because you

1541
01:07:35.719 --> 01:07:36.719
<v Speaker 1>just said that. You can be a member of the

1542
01:07:36.760 --> 01:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>lodge if you believe in all these crazy heretical groups

1543
01:07:38.480 --> 01:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>because you recognize a supreme being. No, no, you don't

1544
01:07:40.719 --> 01:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>want supreme being is legitimate. You recognize that that person

1545
01:07:42.960 --> 01:07:44.679
<v Speaker 1>believes in that supreme being. Therefore you can believe that

1546
01:07:44.679 --> 01:07:46.159
<v Speaker 1>if they take an oath upon the Supreme Being, that

1547
01:07:46.199 --> 01:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>they believe in that they will be held accountable. They

1548
01:07:48.440 --> 01:07:50.079
<v Speaker 1>will believe that they will be held accountable to that oath,

1549
01:07:50.119 --> 01:07:52.119
<v Speaker 1>regardless of whether or not they actually will be held accountable.

1550
01:07:52.159 --> 01:07:54.199
<v Speaker 1>For example, if I'm a Muslim and I want to

1551
01:07:54.199 --> 01:07:55.599
<v Speaker 1>take my oath on a Karan instead of a Bible

1552
01:07:55.599 --> 01:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>because I'm a Muslim, right, Freemasonry doesn't claim whether all

1553
01:07:57.960 --> 01:07:59.639
<v Speaker 1>is God or he always God, or whether Jesus Christ

1554
01:07:59.719 --> 01:08:01.079
<v Speaker 1>is God. But if you're a Muslim, we want you

1555
01:08:01.119 --> 01:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to take an oath on. But it does by claiming

1556
01:08:04.119 --> 01:08:07.599
<v Speaker 1>that the higher power of Masonry is a generic theism.

1557
01:08:08.360 --> 01:08:12.239
<v Speaker 1>That's the claim. That is a denial of Christianity's exclusivity

1558
01:08:12.360 --> 01:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>exclusivity claims.

1559
01:08:13.400 --> 01:08:16.000
<v Speaker 3>That's the point. That's my argument that they can't.

1560
01:08:15.840 --> 01:08:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Get books that you believe in because we believe that

1561
01:08:18.439 --> 01:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you believe you'll be held here. You believe it. I'm

1562
01:08:20.840 --> 01:08:22.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna say you're trying to remove it from what said.

1563
01:08:22.199 --> 01:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But did you just say free Masonry does not believe

1564
01:08:23.680 --> 01:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that Jesus song of God. I said. It doesn't even

1565
01:08:25.680 --> 01:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>claim either way, it doesn't make it claim. All it

1566
01:08:28.600 --> 01:08:30.359
<v Speaker 1>claims is that you must believe in a supreme being.

1567
01:08:30.520 --> 01:08:34.119
<v Speaker 1>And I'm arguing that the Supreme Being itself. This line

1568
01:08:34.119 --> 01:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>of argument that you guys have is a denial of

1569
01:08:36.279 --> 01:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>Jesus and the Trinity. That's my argument. No, it is right,

1570
01:08:39.279 --> 01:08:40.479
<v Speaker 1>just like you said that. The just like you said

1571
01:08:40.520 --> 01:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that the believe even higher power and does what you

1572
01:08:42.880 --> 01:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>say about the Supreme Being and when you flesh it

1573
01:08:44.720 --> 01:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>out contradicts the Christian theology of No Jesus is. There

1574
01:08:48.520 --> 01:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is no contradiction. But I believe that Jesus. The fact

1575
01:08:51.600 --> 01:08:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that you make it subjective doesn't remove my arguments for us.

1576
01:08:54.479 --> 01:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>That has nothing to do with what we're arguing.

1577
01:08:55.920 --> 01:08:56.199
<v Speaker 3>I think it.

1578
01:08:56.319 --> 01:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you guys, O there, you guys think thory objectively

1579
01:08:59.119 --> 01:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>entire argument. Masonry objectively does not deny Christ. It's just

1580
01:09:02.079 --> 01:09:05.039
<v Speaker 1>objectively doesn't when you all like our alcoholics anonymous doesn't

1581
01:09:05.039 --> 01:09:08.119
<v Speaker 1>your believing and the supreme Deity is itself a denial

1582
01:09:08.199 --> 01:09:11.039
<v Speaker 1>of who Christ is. That's the argument. You don't believe

1583
01:09:11.079 --> 01:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in a supreme God. You already showed you the word

1584
01:09:13.720 --> 01:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>concept fallacy and the quantifier shift that when you say

1585
01:09:16.079 --> 01:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>supreme God, if I believe the Supreme God is Satan,

1586
01:09:18.560 --> 01:09:21.039
<v Speaker 1>you qualify it to prove my point that it's a quantify,

1587
01:09:21.039 --> 01:09:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I understand, but it's just to require people to believe

1588
01:09:23.520 --> 01:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in a supreme being. It's not the same thing as

1589
01:09:25.039 --> 01:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>acknowledging the authenticity of any specific supreme being Freemasonry. He's

1590
01:09:28.520 --> 01:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>not claiming which God is the real God's requiring My

1591
01:09:31.920 --> 01:09:34.159
<v Speaker 1>point right, because it's not a religion, it's a secular

1592
01:09:34.720 --> 01:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>There we go.

1593
01:09:36.119 --> 01:09:44.920
<v Speaker 3>So the supreme Being is sufficiently generic to be Shiva, Hindu, whatever, allah.

1594
01:09:45.800 --> 01:09:48.520
<v Speaker 3>But also you can't be in it if you're a

1595
01:09:48.560 --> 01:09:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Satanist and Gnostic, et cetera. Hopefully people see this is

1596
01:09:51.960 --> 01:09:52.439
<v Speaker 3>so silly.

1597
01:09:52.680 --> 01:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it is, as we've seen, as you qualify all

1598
01:09:54.960 --> 01:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of these things that exclude you. So yeah, but the

1599
01:09:56.720 --> 01:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>way I qualified it was not by the official policies

1600
01:09:58.680 --> 01:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of any Masonic doctrine or law or writing. I was sufficient.

1601
01:10:01.680 --> 01:10:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling you that the culture of the fraternity

1602
01:10:03.279 --> 01:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is never going to have house somebody like that culture.

1603
01:10:04.720 --> 01:10:06.359
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't matter. All I have to do is logically

1604
01:10:06.479 --> 01:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>prove that when you say that it's a supreme being,

1605
01:10:08.760 --> 01:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it is not equivalence to the Christian doctrine of the

1606
01:10:10.840 --> 01:10:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Trinity in the d of Christ. It's it's a quantifier

1607
01:10:13.199 --> 01:10:15.279
<v Speaker 1>shift fallacy. It's a word concept fallacy because you keep

1608
01:10:15.279 --> 01:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>asking me, don't you believe in a supreme being? I

1609
01:10:17.840 --> 01:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in the supreme being. As masonry philosophy lays out,

1610
01:10:20.840 --> 01:10:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Masonry doesn't lay out. It does lay out at you see.

1611
01:10:23.279 --> 01:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>Every time we talk about it, they explain that masonry

1612
01:10:25.119 --> 01:10:27.399
<v Speaker 1>philosophy allows it to be anything that you paste onto it.

1613
01:10:27.560 --> 01:10:30.399
<v Speaker 1>That is the argument why it's false. It accepts different

1614
01:10:30.399 --> 01:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>philosophies in thanks geology, the idea there we go, so

1615
01:10:32.960 --> 01:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>it's sufficiently relativistic that it's not a specific God. Does

1616
01:10:36.359 --> 01:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the God of the Bible sound like he's nonspecific or specific?

1617
01:10:40.079 --> 01:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>If he's specific, then you pushing the Masonic gibberish is

1618
01:10:43.640 --> 01:10:48.119
<v Speaker 1>against him. The non specific God in Acts seventeen is

1619
01:10:48.159 --> 01:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the one that they don't know the end of the organization.

1620
01:10:51.800 --> 01:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>It accepts those, but it does not condone or endorse

1621
01:10:53.840 --> 01:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>any of them to be. Acceptance of a supreme generic

1622
01:10:56.680 --> 01:10:59.479
<v Speaker 1>being is itself a rejection of the trinity and is

1623
01:10:59.479 --> 01:11:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the one has it's lux anonymous requires you to believe

1624
01:11:01.439 --> 01:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in a higher power, but does not specify which higher

1625
01:11:03.520 --> 01:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>power you must believe in. It is explicitly denying Christ.

1626
01:11:06.479 --> 01:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're arguing that the supreme Being that allows for

1627
01:11:09.680 --> 01:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>all of the sex to come together under the Masonic banner. Yes, no,

1628
01:11:13.199 --> 01:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but there is no personification of a specific God in freemasonry.

1629
01:11:16.560 --> 01:11:18.239
<v Speaker 1>There's just the requirement that you believe in the Supreme

1630
01:11:18.279 --> 01:11:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Being the required and you say believe in the Supreme Being.

1631
01:11:21.439 --> 01:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>You are attaching predicates that specify certain types of things,

1632
01:11:24.479 --> 01:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>and then when you explain what that is, you say

1633
01:11:26.119 --> 01:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that it can't be theistic Satanism and it can't be

1634
01:11:27.840 --> 01:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>me being God. So you refute yourself when you explain

1635
01:11:30.479 --> 01:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the terms. I disagree because the right for you. But Rsjoen,

1636
01:11:33.920 --> 01:11:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that's wrong. The reputation of a satan is getting into aldge.

1637
01:11:36.319 --> 01:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It is not a matter in policy. It's a matter

1638
01:11:37.680 --> 01:11:40.279
<v Speaker 1>of practical outcome that's irrelevant to the way that you

1639
01:11:40.399 --> 01:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>theologically describe the Supreme Being.

1640
01:11:42.800 --> 01:11:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Still, having a base set of requirements or foundational beliefs

1641
01:11:48.119 --> 01:11:50.159
<v Speaker 2>is not the same as us being a religion or

1642
01:11:50.199 --> 01:11:51.960
<v Speaker 2>making the claim that all religions are equal. Then we're

1643
01:11:51.960 --> 01:11:52.960
<v Speaker 2>all words being the same God.

1644
01:11:53.039 --> 01:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't argue that. I just simply argued that

1645
01:11:55.199 --> 01:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the claim that you allow for and require a belief

1646
01:11:58.760 --> 01:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and a higher power that is a supreme being, is

1647
01:12:00.960 --> 01:12:04.159
<v Speaker 1>itself already a rejection of the Trinity indi duty of Christ.

1648
01:12:04.239 --> 01:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the argument. Now you can say we don't require

1649
01:12:06.560 --> 01:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>specific belief. None of that addresses the argument that I'm making.

1650
01:12:09.600 --> 01:12:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Do you not understand?

1651
01:12:10.319 --> 01:12:10.399
<v Speaker 9>Now?

1652
01:12:10.439 --> 01:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I understand. I just I just fundamentally disagree.

1653
01:12:12.800 --> 01:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And how is it wrong? Because I think that requiring

1654
01:12:15.840 --> 01:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>someone to believe in a supreme breed, this is supreme being,

1655
01:12:17.880 --> 01:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>in order to be a member of an organization is

1656
01:12:19.239 --> 01:12:22.279
<v Speaker 1>not explicitly denying any specifics. There's nothing you denied that

1657
01:12:22.319 --> 01:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the theistic Satanist being. So that's why you're wrong.

1658
01:12:24.960 --> 01:12:28.279
<v Speaker 2>There's no conga I've ever experienced or been required in

1659
01:12:28.439 --> 01:12:32.159
<v Speaker 2>masonry that has alluded to or required me to somehow

1660
01:12:33.560 --> 01:12:35.840
<v Speaker 2>not have a belief in a trinity, not have a

1661
01:12:35.840 --> 01:12:39.039
<v Speaker 2>belief in Jesus. The fact that these are my individual

1662
01:12:39.199 --> 01:12:41.359
<v Speaker 2>personal beliefs that make me a part of this organization.

1663
01:12:41.439 --> 01:12:43.239
<v Speaker 2>And we've beat this to death, but we could go

1664
01:12:43.319 --> 01:12:44.600
<v Speaker 2>into like why this even exists?

1665
01:12:44.640 --> 01:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Like why what I mean? They're still not addressing the argument.

1666
01:12:48.720 --> 01:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It's flying, it's right in their face and it's going

1667
01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:54.319
<v Speaker 1>over their heads. The argument is that must Masonry is

1668
01:12:54.439 --> 01:12:58.479
<v Speaker 1>teaching that you have to believe in some supreme higher power.

1669
01:12:59.199 --> 01:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>The genericism there is inconsistent and as a dogma, and

1670
01:13:03.640 --> 01:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>is also contradictory to what Jesus says about himself. That's

1671
01:13:08.119 --> 01:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the argument, and they keep saying, but you don't have

1672
01:13:10.920 --> 01:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>to believe anything to be in masonry.

1673
01:13:14.279 --> 01:13:17.039
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing that's contradictory to Christianity.

1674
01:13:17.560 --> 01:13:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Why do we even have this fraternity where we allow

1675
01:13:19.960 --> 01:13:22.039
<v Speaker 2>members of different beliefs to be in it? And it's

1676
01:13:22.159 --> 01:13:25.079
<v Speaker 2>essentially goes back. You know, there's a little bit of

1677
01:13:25.119 --> 01:13:27.439
<v Speaker 2>debate on who started first, the Scots and the Londoners

1678
01:13:27.520 --> 01:13:29.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of argue over who had the first lodge, but

1679
01:13:29.439 --> 01:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>essentially you're coming out of the era of the English

1680
01:13:31.640 --> 01:13:34.319
<v Speaker 2>Civil War, and prior to the English Civil War you

1681
01:13:34.479 --> 01:13:37.199
<v Speaker 2>also have several other religious wars in Europe, and they

1682
01:13:37.239 --> 01:13:39.560
<v Speaker 2>were trying to create a society of men who had

1683
01:13:39.840 --> 01:13:43.079
<v Speaker 2>different religious beliefs but could still come together and work

1684
01:13:43.159 --> 01:13:45.439
<v Speaker 2>on themselves and work together for good. That was that

1685
01:13:45.600 --> 01:13:48.399
<v Speaker 2>was the entire purpose of it and why we allowed

1686
01:13:48.399 --> 01:13:52.079
<v Speaker 2>it to be open to these different religions. Yes, with

1687
01:13:52.199 --> 01:13:56.319
<v Speaker 2>some qualifiers, jay are those theological qualifiers perhaps if you

1688
01:13:56.319 --> 01:13:58.279
<v Speaker 2>want to lay it. Oh wait, it's two hours to

1689
01:13:58.319 --> 01:13:59.039
<v Speaker 2>get this at it does that?

1690
01:13:59.239 --> 01:14:01.800
<v Speaker 3>So there he admitted theological qualifiers right there?

1691
01:14:02.039 --> 01:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Make it a theology? Does that make it yeah? I'm

1692
01:14:04.039 --> 01:14:06.079
<v Speaker 1>genera that makes it yeah.

1693
01:14:06.079 --> 01:14:09.199
<v Speaker 2>I feel a some sort of qualifier against Satanism makes

1694
01:14:09.239 --> 01:14:10.600
<v Speaker 2>it incompatible leak or Sianity.

1695
01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>These qualifiers, here's what it here. I'm the problem. These

1696
01:14:13.039 --> 01:14:16.239
<v Speaker 1>qualifiers are not a matter of explicit written Masonic policy.

1697
01:14:16.279 --> 01:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>These qualifiers are a practical outcome of the content of

1698
01:14:19.920 --> 01:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the membership. All right, I think we've beat this to death.

1699
01:14:23.560 --> 01:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's uh, I have a final question. I want to

1700
01:14:25.920 --> 01:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>go around the horn, and anybody wants to ask a

1701
01:14:27.920 --> 01:14:31.159
<v Speaker 1>question during this can go walk up over there and

1702
01:14:31.319 --> 01:14:34.439
<v Speaker 1>go towards the audience. Mike, Joel, and Sara, would you

1703
01:14:34.439 --> 01:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>mind getting a position for that? And okay, so I

1704
01:14:37.680 --> 01:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>want to ask a ending question real quick, and so

1705
01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we can start with Chase and go all the way

1706
01:14:41.560 --> 01:14:46.159
<v Speaker 1>around here. If Paul were alive today and he was

1707
01:14:46.199 --> 01:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>writing a letter to Freemasonry more broadly, now I know

1708
01:14:48.680 --> 01:14:51.039
<v Speaker 1>it's not a centralized force. Let's just say the same

1709
01:14:51.279 --> 01:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>letter goes to each each lodge. So he's writing to

1710
01:14:54.039 --> 01:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Freemasonry TM more broadly, yeah, the Institution First

1711
01:14:57.720 --> 01:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Masons Chapter three. Well, I just what do you think

1712
01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul's sentiment towards Freemasonry would be. So he's writing letters

1713
01:15:05.560 --> 01:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to all churches, not you know, not just Freemasonry as

1714
01:15:08.199 --> 01:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, an institution or whatever, But what do you

1715
01:15:10.680 --> 01:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have positive things to say, negative things to say? Do

1716
01:15:12.600 --> 01:15:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you think he'd be just in different period. That's a

1717
01:15:15.399 --> 01:15:17.119
<v Speaker 1>really good question. Frankly, I don't know the answer.

1718
01:15:18.399 --> 01:15:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd really hate to pretend that I could speak

1719
01:15:20.960 --> 01:15:26.600
<v Speaker 2>for the Apostle Paul that said. You know, Paul was

1720
01:15:26.640 --> 01:15:31.079
<v Speaker 2>a student of comparative religion. He did study other religions,

1721
01:15:31.079 --> 01:15:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and he went in and tried to connect with him.

1722
01:15:32.720 --> 01:15:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I can't think of a theological position

1723
01:15:36.960 --> 01:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>of the Apostle Paul that would be contradictrit.

1724
01:15:39.680 --> 01:15:41.039
<v Speaker 3>Science exactly right.

1725
01:15:41.800 --> 01:15:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully people can figure out where I'm immediately going to go,

1726
01:15:44.279 --> 01:15:47.439
<v Speaker 1>because it turns out there already is a biblical discussion

1727
01:15:47.479 --> 01:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>from Paul about the Unknown God towards Freemasonry. Maybe Jay

1728
01:15:51.840 --> 01:15:54.079
<v Speaker 1>as one right, Well, so we actually have a biblical

1729
01:15:54.119 --> 01:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>example of the very thing that was asked, which is

1730
01:15:56.000 --> 01:15:59.079
<v Speaker 1>essentially the mars Hill discourse where Paul goes to debate

1731
01:15:59.439 --> 01:16:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the Greek philosophers and the Pagans in Act seventeen. And

1732
01:16:02.239 --> 01:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look at Act seventeen in the philosophy that

1733
01:16:03.920 --> 01:16:06.439
<v Speaker 1>they have, and certainly there were probably different philosophers there.

1734
01:16:06.439 --> 01:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The Postoics are mentioned, Epicureans are mentioned, but probably Platonists

1735
01:16:10.520 --> 01:16:13.119
<v Speaker 1>by Thagorieans. Who knows. But one of the dominant elements

1736
01:16:13.159 --> 01:16:16.359
<v Speaker 1>of Hellenic philosophy was the idea that the world was

1737
01:16:16.479 --> 01:16:19.239
<v Speaker 1>eternally in motion or eternally moved. And that's whether that's

1738
01:16:19.279 --> 01:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Plato's emanations or Platonius's later emanations after Paul, or whether

1739
01:16:23.720 --> 01:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that's Aristotle's eternal mover arguments. Again, you heard me at

1740
01:16:26.760 --> 01:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning mentioned that in Basil Sexameron, in Lecture two,

1741
01:16:29.680 --> 01:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he mentions the deity of Aristotle being a diad, which

1742
01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:38.479
<v Speaker 1>is an eternal world moved and accessarily existing through the

1743
01:16:38.560 --> 01:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>first cause or the first actualizer. So in that philosophy

1744
01:16:41.680 --> 01:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you can see Paul refuting them in Act seventeen, having

1745
01:16:44.760 --> 01:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a sense of the philosophy of generic theism that Masonry

1746
01:16:46.960 --> 01:16:50.319
<v Speaker 1>holds to, and Paul argues that the deity that the

1747
01:16:50.359 --> 01:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Athenians are worshiping. He says that they even have an

1748
01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:55.479
<v Speaker 1>idol to the unknown God there without any anim And

1749
01:16:55.560 --> 01:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>he says that deity that you claim to worship, this

1750
01:16:58.880 --> 01:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>unknown God or this law lost name that we mentioned earlier,

1751
01:17:01.560 --> 01:17:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that I mentioned earlier tonight, that Mastron has this lost

1752
01:17:03.359 --> 01:17:05.079
<v Speaker 1>name of God. Well, it turns out Paul actually answers

1753
01:17:05.079 --> 01:17:07.319
<v Speaker 1>all those questions. He says, the unknown God is the

1754
01:17:07.399 --> 01:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>one that you actually worship unknowingly. And I don't believe

1755
01:17:10.199 --> 01:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that that means that Masons are actually worshiping God or Christ.

1756
01:17:12.880 --> 01:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>It is the trinitarian deity that is expressed through the

1757
01:17:16.039 --> 01:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>incarnation of the Lord Jesus Christ. So he actually says

1758
01:17:18.199 --> 01:17:20.039
<v Speaker 1>that we do know the name of God. It's Jesus,

1759
01:17:20.239 --> 01:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not Jabalan, it's not the Tetragramaton. All the Tetragramaton

1760
01:17:23.920 --> 01:17:26.039
<v Speaker 1>points to Christ. So the answers in XT. Seventeen ironically,

1761
01:17:26.680 --> 01:17:29.079
<v Speaker 1>all right, right, we got time for a few questions.

1762
01:17:29.239 --> 01:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Keep it to one, please, and go for it. So

1763
01:17:32.319 --> 01:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Freemason sider, I remember when you said that

1764
01:17:34.720 --> 01:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't know which books are in the Bible.

1765
01:17:36.600 --> 01:17:39.119
<v Speaker 3>And which There's some really good questions, by the way, which.

1766
01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:41.600
<v Speaker 10>Aren't, and I really like that kind of Christianity. I

1767
01:17:41.720 --> 01:17:44.119
<v Speaker 10>have here with me the recently discovered Gospel of Jack.

1768
01:17:44.319 --> 01:17:46.279
<v Speaker 10>It's a very short book, but it is divinely inspired

1769
01:17:46.319 --> 01:17:48.800
<v Speaker 10>and perfect. Just like the rest of the Gospels. It says,

1770
01:17:48.880 --> 01:17:51.319
<v Speaker 10>and then Jesus said, give Jack Althorney all the women

1771
01:17:51.399 --> 01:17:54.000
<v Speaker 10>he may, he alone may have infinity wives. Do you

1772
01:17:54.199 --> 01:17:57.199
<v Speaker 10>reject the Gospel of Jack? If yes, why please?

1773
01:17:57.640 --> 01:17:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Jay?

1774
01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Answer? First, Well, Christianity was provided by Christ with a

1775
01:18:01.800 --> 01:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>normative authority within history to make these types of decisions

1776
01:18:04.960 --> 01:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in a synodial conciliar way. We can see in the

1777
01:18:06.800 --> 01:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>first thousand years of the Church that Christianity always had

1778
01:18:09.720 --> 01:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>these types of local and ecumenical synods, and so that's

1779
01:18:11.960 --> 01:18:14.039
<v Speaker 1>the normative way that the church is governed. There are

1780
01:18:14.039 --> 01:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>people who make the decisions of who's in and who's out.

1781
01:18:16.359 --> 01:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the Orthodox Church pretty clearly in the first thousand years,

1782
01:18:19.079 --> 01:18:21.039
<v Speaker 1>and I would say that that's probably still the case today.

1783
01:18:24.079 --> 01:18:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Do I reject the Gospel of Jack?

1784
01:18:25.800 --> 01:18:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

1785
01:18:26.039 --> 01:18:26.079
<v Speaker 4>What?

1786
01:18:28.880 --> 01:18:29.039
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

1787
01:18:29.159 --> 01:18:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I reject the Gospel of Jack. I'm going to answer

1788
01:18:31.359 --> 01:18:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the question why. Other than the fact that it was

1789
01:18:33.439 --> 01:18:35.319
<v Speaker 1>made up as an example an argument to ask a question.

1790
01:18:38.039 --> 01:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>They never understand theoretical lines of argument. It's kind of

1791
01:18:41.840 --> 01:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>blows my mind, like they actually just take every hypothetical

1792
01:18:46.960 --> 01:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as if you're saying it literally. This is so silly.

1793
01:18:50.960 --> 01:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't. It doesn't line up with any that

1794
01:18:53.039 --> 01:18:55.039
<v Speaker 1>the context of the currenteology that I have, but I

1795
01:18:55.119 --> 01:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>currently believe it's unnecessary.

1796
01:18:57.000 --> 01:19:00.479
<v Speaker 3>So because it doesn't line up with Chase is current

1797
01:19:00.560 --> 01:19:02.199
<v Speaker 3>theology is the reason why.

1798
01:19:02.680 --> 01:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't line up at all with any of the

1799
01:19:03.760 --> 01:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Christian philosophy in the New Testament. So do you determine

1800
01:19:06.199 --> 01:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the canon? Do I determine now? And Jesus does, but

1801
01:19:08.439 --> 01:19:11.039
<v Speaker 1>we do our best to determine the canon scripture. I'm sorry,

1802
01:19:11.119 --> 01:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>where did Janus determined? I'm sorry that your question. Yes,

1803
01:19:15.119 --> 01:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>So here's my philosophy on on the on the Bible.

1804
01:19:18.520 --> 01:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Let me just be explicit here. It's obvious he used the.

1805
01:19:22.840 --> 01:19:26.720
<v Speaker 5>Term my current theology, right, So this is, of course

1806
01:19:26.960 --> 01:19:29.920
<v Speaker 5>assumption that your theology is in flux, is changing.

1807
01:19:30.039 --> 01:19:32.039
<v Speaker 4>It's not eternally true.

1808
01:19:32.600 --> 01:19:34.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean he affirmed earlier that he doesn't even think

1809
01:19:34.520 --> 01:19:38.159
<v Speaker 5>you can know absolute truth or have any sort of

1810
01:19:38.399 --> 01:19:39.439
<v Speaker 5>epistemic certainty.

1811
01:19:39.600 --> 01:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's Briefically, it's from from the New Testament,

1812
01:19:44.720 --> 01:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>that you can be a Christian before the Bible was

1813
01:19:46.239 --> 01:19:49.239
<v Speaker 1>compiled or written. Right, it's obvious that people readingmatized Christian

1814
01:19:49.800 --> 01:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>even before Jesus was dead or any of it actually happened.

1815
01:19:51.880 --> 01:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>There was Baptists that were taking place. And one of

1816
01:19:54.720 --> 01:19:58.079
<v Speaker 1>the concerns that I have about contemporary Christianity. I don't

1817
01:19:58.079 --> 01:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>mean to make this specifically theological, because it doesn't really

1818
01:20:01.199 --> 01:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>matter what I think is true or not religiously, as

1819
01:20:04.239 --> 01:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>far as is relevant to the argument that rab about

1820
01:20:05.960 --> 01:20:08.279
<v Speaker 1>whether or not Free Mason's campatible Christianity. I think one

1821
01:20:08.319 --> 01:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of the mistakes that modern contemporary Christians make is they

1822
01:20:10.520 --> 01:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>worship the Bible as a false idol, and they study

1823
01:20:12.960 --> 01:20:15.279
<v Speaker 1>it more than they contemplate and pursue a relationship with God.

1824
01:20:15.600 --> 01:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you can be a Christian without the Bible,

1825
01:20:17.600 --> 01:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>that means that the Bible is it's something that's added

1826
01:20:20.520 --> 01:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that's unnecessary. It's important, it contains true truth, It documents

1827
01:20:24.560 --> 01:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>why happed historically, it explains the theology. But I get

1828
01:20:28.399 --> 01:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>I feel miffed sometimes by Christians who who spend all

1829
01:20:32.199 --> 01:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>their time studying specific verses and specific letters that weren't

1830
01:20:35.560 --> 01:20:38.239
<v Speaker 1>even required to be known or written or conceived in

1831
01:20:38.359 --> 01:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>order to be a Christian originally, and I think that

1832
01:20:39.680 --> 01:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we should focus on a relationship with God through Jesus

1833
01:20:41.840 --> 01:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Christ more than we focus on studying the scripture. I

1834
01:20:44.920 --> 01:20:50.239
<v Speaker 1>do feel that way personally. No, it's a controversial. Take mind,

1835
01:20:50.239 --> 01:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>you want answer that? Or do you want to go

1836
01:20:51.239 --> 01:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>next one?

1837
01:20:51.640 --> 01:20:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

1838
01:20:51.920 --> 01:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>What are we still on?

1839
01:20:52.640 --> 01:20:52.920
<v Speaker 3>All right?

1840
01:20:53.560 --> 01:20:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Jack? Yes, let's just go to the action one here

1841
01:20:55.359 --> 01:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for a time sake.

1842
01:20:55.960 --> 01:20:58.560
<v Speaker 11>I believe God's a paradox, and I think even now

1843
01:20:58.680 --> 01:21:02.000
<v Speaker 11>the Orthodox Church allows non Christians beyond the nave. But

1844
01:21:02.119 --> 01:21:04.079
<v Speaker 11>my question is specific for Ja, but everyone to chime in.

1845
01:21:05.479 --> 01:21:07.800
<v Speaker 11>I'm employed at a multinational corporation. We have over six

1846
01:21:07.880 --> 01:21:11.520
<v Speaker 11>hundred thousand employees, and we even employ irreligious atheists.

1847
01:21:11.760 --> 01:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I have private, closed door business meetings with them. This

1848
01:21:15.039 --> 01:21:17.279
<v Speaker 1>is so, this is so low to here. This guy's like,

1849
01:21:18.039 --> 01:21:20.239
<v Speaker 1>so I can't be a new corporation because I'm in

1850
01:21:20.319 --> 01:21:23.239
<v Speaker 1>there with other non Christians. As if it's like an

1851
01:21:23.279 --> 01:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>equivalence between the Masonic lodge and a corporation. Does that

1852
01:21:28.199 --> 01:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>conflict with my Roman Catholic Christian duties in religion? I

1853
01:21:33.960 --> 01:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't think so. As a Roman Catholic, you have there

1854
01:21:37.640 --> 01:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that I've never heard of anything that would conflict between

1855
01:21:39.640 --> 01:21:42.479
<v Speaker 1>a corporate stance unless you were, through the corporation explicitly

1856
01:21:42.560 --> 01:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>required to do something that would be immortal sin or

1857
01:21:45.640 --> 01:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Thank you are Are you making the

1858
01:21:49.439 --> 01:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>equivalence to Masonry if you gather that and deduce it,

1859
01:21:53.840 --> 01:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair. I think he's trying to I

1860
01:21:55.560 --> 01:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to speak for him. I think he's trying

1861
01:21:56.800 --> 01:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to imply that what he's trying to ask the question,

1862
01:21:58.760 --> 01:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>what's the difference between looking for an organization that allows

1863
01:22:01.199 --> 01:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>people who deny Christ and in joining a fraternity that

1864
01:22:04.359 --> 01:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that's ambiguous in its definition of the Supreme Being? Because

1865
01:22:06.920 --> 01:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the ambiguity actually turned into specificity, which was the point.

1866
01:22:10.119 --> 01:22:13.239
<v Speaker 1>And your own Catholic Church dogmatizes and mandates that you

1867
01:22:13.239 --> 01:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>can't be a freemason in the canon law. So you

1868
01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>would be against Roman Catholic canon law being a Mason,

1869
01:22:18.520 --> 01:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>but you would not be against romccallay cannon law, but

1870
01:22:20.279 --> 01:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>being in a corporation. And the differences precisely because Masonry,

1871
01:22:23.399 --> 01:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>as we're seeing tonight, is not just a philosopher or

1872
01:22:25.840 --> 01:22:29.479
<v Speaker 1>secular society. It actually has an explicated theological requirement, and

1873
01:22:29.520 --> 01:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that was what I was trying to demonstrate. That's a

1874
01:22:31.560 --> 01:22:34.239
<v Speaker 1>false equivalence. It's a good point. I didn't make the equivalents.

1875
01:22:34.640 --> 01:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the next one. Sorry, good question, good question. Uh,

1876
01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we got time for a few more, so go for it. Hey,

1877
01:22:41.439 --> 01:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's for a Jay christ has risen first of all,

1878
01:22:43.880 --> 01:22:46.399
<v Speaker 1>And quickly, do you have any plans for a Freemason

1879
01:22:46.439 --> 01:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>cringe core track? And what are some good books that

1880
01:22:49.680 --> 01:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I can read on the Jewish accomplistic connection with freemasoner.

1881
01:22:53.399 --> 01:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I might get my throat slid if I make a song. Yeah,

1882
01:22:55.720 --> 01:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get that's a Joe Hull. You plug your

1883
01:22:57.199 --> 01:23:00.279
<v Speaker 1>own books, Jay, that's just a Joe. There's a book

1884
01:23:00.279 --> 01:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that's somebody spent aymen years ago by William Green called

1885
01:23:02.439 --> 01:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>The Blazing Star and the Jewish Cabala, and it's about

1886
01:23:04.640 --> 01:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the influence of Cabala on Freemasonry. William bring.

1887
01:23:12.720 --> 01:23:16.479
<v Speaker 8>A question for the two Freemasons. Saint Paul wrote about

1888
01:23:16.520 --> 01:23:20.560
<v Speaker 8>not being unequally yoked with unbelievers. Yeah, and I know

1889
01:23:20.640 --> 01:23:22.319
<v Speaker 8>you guys kind of touched on the oath taking and

1890
01:23:22.399 --> 01:23:24.119
<v Speaker 8>how we do take an oath in a court room

1891
01:23:24.159 --> 01:23:24.760
<v Speaker 8>and that sort of thing.

1892
01:23:24.840 --> 01:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>But you call your lodge members brothers.

1893
01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:27.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and.

1894
01:23:28.840 --> 01:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I wonder about God.

1895
01:23:30.800 --> 01:23:33.119
<v Speaker 8>Specifically calls us in the Christian faith to be set

1896
01:23:33.159 --> 01:23:36.840
<v Speaker 8>apart from the world. Why would you frat fat fraternize

1897
01:23:37.239 --> 01:23:40.960
<v Speaker 8>with people who believe in a version of the deity

1898
01:23:41.079 --> 01:23:43.680
<v Speaker 8>that is Antichrist exactly exactly?

1899
01:23:43.760 --> 01:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Well said, yeah, that's a good question. I would say that,

1900
01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and Ryan out other t your thoughts too. I think

1901
01:23:48.680 --> 01:23:52.319
<v Speaker 1>that distinguishing between who's a legitimate brother in Christ is

1902
01:23:52.800 --> 01:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>different than qualifying the people's fraternity brothers. So there are

1903
01:23:57.439 --> 01:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>some brothers in the fraternity, for example, who would not

1904
01:23:59.560 --> 01:24:02.479
<v Speaker 1>consider brothers in Christ because we don't share the same

1905
01:24:02.560 --> 01:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>theological I wouldn't take a meniing with these people. But

1906
01:24:04.720 --> 01:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing in the in the Masonic lodge is

1907
01:24:06.439 --> 01:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not It's not like a religious sacrament or or that

1908
01:24:08.880 --> 01:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>type of that type of communion.

1909
01:24:12.239 --> 01:24:14.600
<v Speaker 2>What would you say, Ryan, Yeah, that's essentially that. I mean,

1910
01:24:14.720 --> 01:24:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I would just add to it that, you know, the

1911
01:24:17.960 --> 01:24:22.800
<v Speaker 2>idea that what your original point about being unequally yoked.

1912
01:24:25.359 --> 01:24:27.600
<v Speaker 2>There is no you know, I've never had a Masonic

1913
01:24:27.640 --> 01:24:30.359
<v Speaker 2>brother try to talk me out of my Christianity to

1914
01:24:30.520 --> 01:24:33.840
<v Speaker 2>proselytize another faith. There's nothing that's made me doubt my faith.

1915
01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:38.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a personal journey, an individual journey that exposes you

1916
01:24:38.039 --> 01:24:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to different ideas, but you're left up, you know, as

1917
01:24:39.920 --> 01:24:44.840
<v Speaker 2>a man, to still make your own determinations. And I've

1918
01:24:44.840 --> 01:24:47.680
<v Speaker 2>actually seen the opposite. I've seen men that joined the

1919
01:24:47.720 --> 01:24:50.640
<v Speaker 2>fraternity that didn't start out as Christians. Maybe they had

1920
01:24:50.680 --> 01:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>a more deistic view, maybe they were just kind of

1921
01:24:53.680 --> 01:24:56.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm an example of that. And through their

1922
01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:01.039
<v Speaker 2>involvement in the fraternity, which stresses doesn't tell you which,

1923
01:25:01.399 --> 01:25:04.199
<v Speaker 2>but it stresses the need for you to seek out God,

1924
01:25:04.760 --> 01:25:08.880
<v Speaker 2>these men have become strong Christians through freemasonry.

1925
01:25:08.920 --> 01:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>And I've not seen the opposite. I've not seen a strong,

1926
01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>strong Christians who don't even know when the Bible was

1927
01:25:14.479 --> 01:25:18.039
<v Speaker 1>put together, what Constantine did, I don't know anything about anything,

1928
01:25:18.119 --> 01:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but they're strong Christians.

1929
01:25:19.079 --> 01:25:22.479
<v Speaker 2>Now, well, Christian man join and then somehow be turned

1930
01:25:22.520 --> 01:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>into a Hindu or et cetera.

1931
01:25:25.039 --> 01:25:27.199
<v Speaker 1>I would say that that's a great text because in

1932
01:25:27.279 --> 01:25:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the context of Corinthians or Paul's talking about that, he's

1933
01:25:29.520 --> 01:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about religiously, physically, theologically, you know, all types of

1934
01:25:35.039 --> 01:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>unions that you could have with somebody says we can't

1935
01:25:36.920 --> 01:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>share the table of demons and the table of God.

1936
01:25:38.760 --> 01:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>We can't be unequally of for examply advices against marrying

1937
01:25:41.520 --> 01:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>and unbelieving life. So there are spiritual realities, according to Paul.

1938
01:25:45.039 --> 01:25:47.319
<v Speaker 3>That lead So again people in the chat, like you

1939
01:25:47.359 --> 01:25:48.199
<v Speaker 3>guys are not getting it.

1940
01:25:49.039 --> 01:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter that Freemasonry says it's not religious. The

1941
01:25:52.800 --> 01:25:55.239
<v Speaker 1>argument is know it in fact is religious. And we

1942
01:25:55.359 --> 01:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated that for the first hour that they have religious commitments,

1943
01:25:59.079 --> 01:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>even in saying that you believe in generic theism and

1944
01:26:02.239 --> 01:26:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a quote supreme being, that is a religious commitment that

1945
01:26:05.760 --> 01:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>entails a bunch of other commitments. That's what I demonstrated

1946
01:26:09.800 --> 01:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to them when I said, can I be a Satanist?

1947
01:26:12.039 --> 01:26:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Can I be a Gnostic? Can I believe that I'm God?

1948
01:26:14.399 --> 01:26:14.439
<v Speaker 4>No?

1949
01:26:14.640 --> 01:26:15.279
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no no.

1950
01:26:15.479 --> 01:26:16.159
<v Speaker 3>So there's all these.

1951
01:26:16.079 --> 01:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Criteria that exclude you from membership. And it doesn't matter

1952
01:26:19.640 --> 01:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>if they say, but it's just because we don't like you,

1953
01:26:21.560 --> 01:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the exclusion. Well, the exclusion that you don't like

1954
01:26:23.840 --> 01:26:26.039
<v Speaker 1>me is still based on some standard of the good.

1955
01:26:26.039 --> 01:26:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Or the bad. So they have an ethic.

1956
01:26:30.199 --> 01:26:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Yoke us and link us through these types of oaths

1957
01:26:32.520 --> 01:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and organizations even though they claim that it's purely secular,

1958
01:26:35.680 --> 01:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen, I think tonight the claims are not

1959
01:26:38.039 --> 01:26:40.479
<v Speaker 1>actually when they're fleshed out purely secular, they're actually have

1960
01:26:40.600 --> 01:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>lethological So actually think this is a really good point.

1961
01:26:42.159 --> 01:26:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Bring up the obligations again. You're specifically told that they

1962
01:26:46.720 --> 01:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>are not incompatible or above the obligations, the duties that

1963
01:26:53.039 --> 01:26:54.600
<v Speaker 2>you have to God, your family, your country.

1964
01:26:54.840 --> 01:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, are you brotherhood yoked with Hindus? Say again, I'm sorry,

1965
01:26:58.920 --> 01:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are you a brotherhood yoked with Hindus? Hmm, I'm in

1966
01:27:03.760 --> 01:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the context of a lot Ooh, I think this was

1967
01:27:05.600 --> 01:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a I forgot this part ODJ. I think probably the

1968
01:27:07.680 --> 01:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>answers yes, but yeah, all right, I only each point, right,

1969
01:27:13.079 --> 01:27:15.039
<v Speaker 1>and just for the time's sake, Okay, sure you be

1970
01:27:15.159 --> 01:27:17.239
<v Speaker 1>one file point one final point. What I'm brotherhood yoked

1971
01:27:17.239 --> 01:27:19.319
<v Speaker 1>with my biological brother too, regardless of what he believes.

1972
01:27:19.399 --> 01:27:19.479
<v Speaker 4>Right.

1973
01:27:19.640 --> 01:27:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1974
01:27:19.840 --> 01:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>The implication there is that you're somehow because of that, uh,

1975
01:27:23.319 --> 01:27:26.039
<v Speaker 2>being yoked as in a marriage perhaps where you know

1976
01:27:26.119 --> 01:27:27.800
<v Speaker 2>you have someone of a different faith that you're married to,

1977
01:27:28.239 --> 01:27:31.600
<v Speaker 2>that there's there's some obligation or pressure there to adopt

1978
01:27:31.680 --> 01:27:33.279
<v Speaker 2>their faith and there's not.

1979
01:27:33.439 --> 01:27:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Paul doesn't say that. He just simply says to be

1980
01:27:35.319 --> 01:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>unequally oaked. I mean, could I be in the myth

1981
01:27:36.920 --> 01:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>recult at the same time as being a Christian?

1982
01:27:39.479 --> 01:27:39.520
<v Speaker 4>No?

1983
01:27:39.720 --> 01:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks y, next question, Thank you everyone for being here.

1984
01:27:42.399 --> 01:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Appreciated debate. This question is for Riyan.

1985
01:27:44.760 --> 01:27:46.960
<v Speaker 6>You talked about how monotheistic Satanist would not pass a

1986
01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:49.920
<v Speaker 6>moral character test of Freemasons, so that kind of talks

1987
01:27:49.960 --> 01:27:52.800
<v Speaker 6>to objective morality. So I was wondering, how are Muslims

1988
01:27:52.840 --> 01:27:55.720
<v Speaker 6>able to become Freemasons when they believe in child brides, females, circumcision,

1989
01:27:55.760 --> 01:27:57.560
<v Speaker 6>other demonic wouldn't get in my lodge, I would.

1990
01:27:57.319 --> 01:28:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Say, oh, and then they say I don't want it.

1991
01:28:01.039 --> 01:28:01.880
<v Speaker 3>That's not the question.

1992
01:28:02.199 --> 01:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>They would not be allowed. But there were not asking you,

1993
01:28:04.560 --> 01:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the lodge. Sure, yeah, well there's okay.

1994
01:28:08.399 --> 01:28:12.399
<v Speaker 2>You brought up a funny example about the safety and

1995
01:28:12.479 --> 01:28:14.439
<v Speaker 2>my pronouncing that right and one of your videos to

1996
01:28:14.760 --> 01:28:18.119
<v Speaker 2>the practice of widow burning and Hinduism, and you imply

1997
01:28:18.279 --> 01:28:19.840
<v Speaker 2>that you know, because we may allow a Hindu that

1998
01:28:19.880 --> 01:28:22.079
<v Speaker 2>that we would have to accept this practice of widow burning.

1999
01:28:22.399 --> 01:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I think no, the argument is what he said, it's

2000
01:28:24.720 --> 01:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>what's the argument it's arbitrary? Did you not make that

2001
01:28:29.039 --> 01:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>claim or I mistudying? More of the argument is not

2002
01:28:31.239 --> 01:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that you support widow burning, it's that the ethics or arbitrary.

2003
01:28:35.319 --> 01:28:36.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is solo tier.

2004
01:28:36.840 --> 01:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like, obviously if I said, Hindus who believe in

2005
01:28:39.600 --> 01:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>widow burning, how are you going to have a common

2006
01:28:41.840 --> 01:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>ethic with people that believe that.

2007
01:28:43.239 --> 01:28:45.680
<v Speaker 3>That's the point. So you're saying that I have to

2008
01:28:45.880 --> 01:28:49.680
<v Speaker 3>accept widow burning. No, this guy is just like, cannot

2009
01:28:49.720 --> 01:28:50.000
<v Speaker 3>get that.

2010
01:28:52.159 --> 01:28:55.279
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, There the entire system, the degrees are

2011
01:28:55.359 --> 01:28:57.880
<v Speaker 2>teaching very specific ethics, philosophy.

2012
01:28:58.279 --> 01:29:00.159
<v Speaker 1>This is where I get him right here, and all

2013
01:29:00.199 --> 01:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that that was from. We don't know where cardinal virtues. Okay,

2014
01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:05.079
<v Speaker 1>so that's who That was one small example, but I

2015
01:29:05.119 --> 01:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>mean where you never said where.

2016
01:29:09.319 --> 01:29:11.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna slow this down because it's the best part right.

2017
01:29:11.199 --> 01:29:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Here they're from.

2018
01:29:12.399 --> 01:29:13.039
<v Speaker 3>You said, I don't know.

2019
01:29:13.680 --> 01:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I said, we pulled from a lot of different religions,

2020
01:29:15.920 --> 01:29:21.079
<v Speaker 1>and you pull from religions for your ethics. Oh we remember,

2021
01:29:21.199 --> 01:29:24.359
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't a the theological society. Those from religion.

2022
01:29:26.640 --> 01:29:30.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not a religious it's not a theological society. Where

2023
01:29:30.600 --> 01:29:32.920
<v Speaker 3>do you get your ethics. We pull from religions.

2024
01:29:33.640 --> 01:29:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Hear that the arbitrary.

2025
01:29:38.920 --> 01:29:43.159
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, the entire system the degrees are teaching

2026
01:29:43.640 --> 01:29:46.439
<v Speaker 2>very specific ethics philosophies from.

2027
01:29:46.640 --> 01:29:48.199
<v Speaker 1>And we saw that that was from. We don't know

2028
01:29:48.239 --> 01:29:53.159
<v Speaker 1>where cardinal virtues. Okay, says who that was one small example,

2029
01:29:53.199 --> 01:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>but I mean where. You never said where they're from.

2030
01:29:55.760 --> 01:29:56.359
<v Speaker 3>You said, I don't know.

2031
01:29:57.039 --> 01:29:59.159
<v Speaker 1>No, I said, we pulled from a lot of different religions,

2032
01:29:59.239 --> 01:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and we you pull from religions for your ethics. Oh

2033
01:30:03.439 --> 01:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we remember this wasn't a theological society.

2034
01:30:07.199 --> 01:30:12.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's where it was really over it there, I

2035
01:30:12.199 --> 01:30:13.159
<v Speaker 3>think from religion.

2036
01:30:13.680 --> 01:30:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Didn't you agree that religions contain philosophies? That weren't theos

2037
01:30:17.800 --> 01:30:20.359
<v Speaker 2>going about what you just said? Yeah, so you do

2038
01:30:20.439 --> 01:30:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you pull from religions. We pour your ethics philosophies that

2039
01:30:24.880 --> 01:30:26.479
<v Speaker 2>are You just said relative religions.

2040
01:30:26.560 --> 01:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>You messed up and said religions. We pulled from religions.

2041
01:30:29.880 --> 01:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>We pulled philosophies at England with it. Do you pull

2042
01:30:32.840 --> 01:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>your ethics from religions? That's what he said, and not

2043
01:30:34.920 --> 01:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>just religions.

2044
01:30:35.600 --> 01:30:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Some of it.

2045
01:30:36.119 --> 01:30:38.159
<v Speaker 1>There is some stoke. You tripped up.

2046
01:30:38.199 --> 01:30:40.239
<v Speaker 3>This is like a kid getting caught stealing in the

2047
01:30:40.279 --> 01:30:41.000
<v Speaker 3>cookie jar.

2048
01:30:40.960 --> 01:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, what I didn't I was.

2049
01:30:42.960 --> 01:30:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Going to get the cookies and also feed the dog

2050
01:30:45.800 --> 01:30:48.640
<v Speaker 3>with the cookies. And it's not just cookies for me.

2051
01:30:48.920 --> 01:30:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm stealing the cookies for other robinhood. I'm stealing the

2052
01:30:52.199 --> 01:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>cookies for all the kids in the neighborhood.

2053
01:30:53.600 --> 01:30:56.640
<v Speaker 3>It's like, yeah, okay, we got you, dude, we got you.

2054
01:30:57.039 --> 01:31:00.159
<v Speaker 1>And undid all of your first hour of argument is

2055
01:31:00.199 --> 01:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>pressed on where.

2056
01:31:01.680 --> 01:31:04.079
<v Speaker 5>You get ethics and morals from and that those are

2057
01:31:04.119 --> 01:31:06.359
<v Speaker 5>inherently religious values that you would have.

2058
01:31:06.479 --> 01:31:09.119
<v Speaker 4>To be pulling from a religion. And then for him

2059
01:31:09.119 --> 01:31:11.319
<v Speaker 4>to even admit that, you.

2060
01:31:11.359 --> 01:31:15.479
<v Speaker 5>Know, freemasonry or either at the cold boundaries do we

2061
01:31:15.760 --> 01:31:18.279
<v Speaker 5>we believe in certain ethics and morals And there are

2062
01:31:18.399 --> 01:31:21.199
<v Speaker 5>boundaries and you could be you know, if you were Satanists,

2063
01:31:21.520 --> 01:31:23.199
<v Speaker 5>you couldn't be it. If you're a bad guy, you

2064
01:31:23.279 --> 01:31:28.640
<v Speaker 5>can't join. It also contradicts. There's so many ways that

2065
01:31:28.800 --> 01:31:31.079
<v Speaker 5>you got him on that same point from so many

2066
01:31:31.159 --> 01:31:35.279
<v Speaker 5>different angles that it's, uh, it's it's crazy that he

2067
01:31:35.399 --> 01:31:37.720
<v Speaker 5>still thinks that he's able to kind of square the

2068
01:31:37.760 --> 01:31:41.520
<v Speaker 5>circle there, Oh, swear.

2069
01:31:41.359 --> 01:31:43.359
<v Speaker 3>In the circle there? You just went full Mason on

2070
01:31:43.439 --> 01:31:44.359
<v Speaker 3>them right there, dude.

2071
01:31:44.640 --> 01:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>No, yeah, yeah you did. You just said you pull

2072
01:31:47.960 --> 01:31:50.079
<v Speaker 1>from religions and does everything in the first hour. I've

2073
01:31:50.119 --> 01:31:52.319
<v Speaker 1>said that you your whole first hour with us.

2074
01:31:52.680 --> 01:31:55.279
<v Speaker 3>There you go, and I don't I hammer him Martal, Right, there.

2075
01:31:56.680 --> 01:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Go the next person place.

2076
01:31:58.680 --> 01:32:01.560
<v Speaker 12>I think you kind of us with a previous question.

2077
01:32:01.680 --> 01:32:05.159
<v Speaker 12>But you know, Jesus say is no one comes as

2078
01:32:05.159 --> 01:32:08.920
<v Speaker 12>a father. But through me, do you all make as Christians?

2079
01:32:09.039 --> 01:32:14.079
<v Speaker 12>In being Mason's do you make an effort to proselytize.

2080
01:32:14.920 --> 01:32:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Muslims or anyway? The last part is the if you

2081
01:32:19.640 --> 01:32:21.479
<v Speaker 3>guys want to watch it, you can go watch it.

2082
01:32:21.560 --> 01:32:22.279
<v Speaker 3>But that's enough of this.

2083
01:32:23.159 --> 01:32:26.239
<v Speaker 1>They didn't get me on the part about the there's

2084
01:32:26.279 --> 01:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>just another false equivalence to say that for citing the

2085
01:32:29.159 --> 01:32:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Pledge of Allegiance is the same thing as Mason. You know,

2086
01:32:31.199 --> 01:32:33.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a false equivalent saying the pledge allegiance is not

2087
01:32:33.479 --> 01:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>initiation into a blood over brotherhood based on around the Zohar.

2088
01:32:37.880 --> 01:32:42.039
<v Speaker 1>So no uh, anybody else. So overall thoughts, you guys

2089
01:32:42.039 --> 01:32:43.039
<v Speaker 1>feel free to talk about.

2090
01:32:42.840 --> 01:32:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Whatever you want to. We'll read some super chats if

2091
01:32:46.319 --> 01:32:48.359
<v Speaker 3>you want to watch the rest of it. If you

2092
01:32:48.399 --> 01:32:51.760
<v Speaker 3>think I'm lying, you can go watch it here. What

2093
01:32:51.840 --> 01:32:53.840
<v Speaker 3>did you guys think? Who won the debate?

2094
01:32:53.960 --> 01:32:54.079
<v Speaker 4>Here?

2095
01:32:54.119 --> 01:32:57.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna put a little stud poll here and and

2096
01:32:57.760 --> 01:33:00.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, be honest if you think that and do that, well,

2097
01:33:00.720 --> 01:33:01.239
<v Speaker 3>feel free.

2098
01:33:02.239 --> 01:33:04.239
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but Jobulon is an option.

2099
01:33:06.399 --> 01:33:07.479
<v Speaker 3>Jabulon won the debate.

2100
01:33:09.520 --> 01:33:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think jabul.

2101
01:33:16.880 --> 01:33:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Anybody else.

2102
01:33:26.920 --> 01:33:29.079
<v Speaker 4>There was really one sided. I don't think uh.

2103
01:33:30.039 --> 01:33:32.119
<v Speaker 5>I was expecting them to seem a little bit more

2104
01:33:32.159 --> 01:33:35.479
<v Speaker 5>heated too, like you said it, maybe it was more Well,

2105
01:33:35.520 --> 01:33:38.840
<v Speaker 5>this is edited the physiclean you can see their physical

2106
01:33:38.920 --> 01:33:41.279
<v Speaker 5>reactions to what's going on in the level.

2107
01:33:41.039 --> 01:33:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Of the voice.

2108
01:33:41.680 --> 01:33:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, they they balanced the audio levels and also uh,

2109
01:33:45.479 --> 01:33:48.399
<v Speaker 1>several I mean it was clipped. I'm not saying they

2110
01:33:48.439 --> 01:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't cut cut out any argumentation, but they might have

2111
01:33:51.680 --> 01:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>cut out some of the angry parts. But it was intense.

2112
01:33:54.920 --> 01:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You can ask the people who were there. Uh, let's see,

2113
01:34:00.920 --> 01:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm re used a couple of super shots two cop

2114
01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>True Tuca Trupa twenty dollars. Great to see Tristan back

2115
01:34:08.359 --> 01:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on the stream.

2116
01:34:08.800 --> 01:34:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Guys.

2117
01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I will split the super chest with Tristan tonight, so

2118
01:34:12.720 --> 01:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys are also supporting him.

2119
01:34:13.880 --> 01:34:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Dank Bud five dollars. This was a dank stream. Snake

2120
01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Foot two dollars. Our last stream exactly bad.

2121
01:34:21.760 --> 01:34:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Yep, it was a straight up pimp as hell, dude,

2122
01:34:25.359 --> 01:34:29.720
<v Speaker 1>The stream was pimp as hell, so sick, d it

2123
01:34:29.880 --> 01:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was so sick. Snake Foot says, get a PhD and

2124
01:34:33.680 --> 01:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>then start a bipoc church and then Gavin will debate

2125
01:34:35.920 --> 01:34:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you exactly be cursed.

2126
01:34:37.399 --> 01:34:40.319
<v Speaker 3>Five dollars. Will you be part of the new network

2127
01:34:40.399 --> 01:34:40.920
<v Speaker 3>with Alex?

2128
01:34:41.159 --> 01:34:41.279
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

2129
01:34:41.479 --> 01:34:42.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so.

2130
01:34:43.159 --> 01:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean I will at least continue what I've been doing.

2131
01:34:45.800 --> 01:34:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether I'll have my own show or whatever,

2132
01:34:47.880 --> 01:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see. Nick says, I love the clip where

2133
01:34:52.279 --> 01:34:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Alex is interviewing the gall on the street about WHEMI Grove.

2134
01:34:54.439 --> 01:34:55.119
<v Speaker 3>That's Dave Gergan.

2135
01:34:56.279 --> 01:34:56.399
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

2136
01:34:56.800 --> 01:34:59.119
<v Speaker 3>You know we played that before. Dad to the world.

2137
01:34:59.199 --> 01:35:01.039
<v Speaker 3>What's up? Craftsman?

2138
01:35:03.159 --> 01:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Alex Jones getting a rear show by Craig Jones was awesome.

2139
01:35:06.560 --> 01:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Tango twenty dollars. It's gonna be a good night, boys

2140
01:35:08.720 --> 01:35:09.079
<v Speaker 1>and girls.

2141
01:35:09.279 --> 01:35:11.479
<v Speaker 3>Cheer up. Cheers to Jay and the Chat and Tristan.

2142
01:35:11.600 --> 01:35:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. Frontier says Alex Jones is Bill Hicks. That's

2143
01:35:15.079 --> 01:35:15.520
<v Speaker 3>not true.

2144
01:35:17.880 --> 01:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Alex looks like him. That doesn't you know, there's a

2145
01:35:21.840 --> 01:35:23.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of people look like people. That doesn't mean the

2146
01:35:23.520 --> 01:35:23.800
<v Speaker 1>art of them.

2147
01:35:24.359 --> 01:35:26.119
<v Speaker 4>You don't look like them at all anymore. I mean

2148
01:35:26.199 --> 01:35:29.399
<v Speaker 4>maybe twenty years ago and that kind of rumors started,

2149
01:35:30.079 --> 01:35:32.520
<v Speaker 4>there was a little bit of physical resemblance.

2150
01:35:32.600 --> 01:35:34.560
<v Speaker 5>But also if he was Bill Hicks, he would be

2151
01:35:34.640 --> 01:35:35.960
<v Speaker 5>like seventy something years old.

2152
01:35:36.079 --> 01:35:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I know, it's so retarded.

2153
01:35:37.039 --> 01:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I used to watch Bill Hicks in the early nineties

2154
01:35:39.560 --> 01:35:42.119
<v Speaker 1>on stand up and Alex was like, Alex would have

2155
01:35:42.199 --> 01:35:45.479
<v Speaker 1>been like a teenager. So no, Alex Jones was not

2156
01:35:45.640 --> 01:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Bill Hicks doing stand up in the nineteen nineties. That

2157
01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>like noted the improv with Caroline Ray and all the

2158
01:35:52.279 --> 01:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>stand ups of the nineties.

2159
01:35:54.359 --> 01:35:58.359
<v Speaker 5>Bill Hicks just he blasted himself so hard with mushrooms

2160
01:35:59.399 --> 01:36:01.039
<v Speaker 5>at the end of his career when he was like dying,

2161
01:36:01.079 --> 01:36:03.000
<v Speaker 5>remember he was, he was getting really into the psychodey

2162
01:36:03.119 --> 01:36:06.239
<v Speaker 5>was he was a psychology MK ultra and he went

2163
01:36:06.399 --> 01:36:09.479
<v Speaker 5>and he he emerged from his MK ultra you know,

2164
01:36:09.680 --> 01:36:10.720
<v Speaker 5>kompa chamber.

2165
01:36:12.119 --> 01:36:14.880
<v Speaker 4>He just as Alex Jones.

2166
01:36:14.920 --> 01:36:18.119
<v Speaker 5>I don't understand the like people lived legit believe that

2167
01:36:18.239 --> 01:36:22.199
<v Speaker 5>people actually think that that is a Dogmas.

2168
01:36:22.079 --> 01:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Pepper prophet says Jay Tristan. How does it feel to

2169
01:36:26.680 --> 01:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>be podcast mogged by Jay Diaper?

2170
01:36:32.039 --> 01:36:35.439
<v Speaker 4>I think I actually the first one is say Jay Dipper.

2171
01:36:36.199 --> 01:36:38.159
<v Speaker 4>We were saying that, like making fun of the people

2172
01:36:38.199 --> 01:36:40.079
<v Speaker 4>that have make fun of your names. There was Jay Dipper,

2173
01:36:40.159 --> 01:36:43.079
<v Speaker 4>there was j Dryer. I don't.

2174
01:36:43.119 --> 01:36:45.079
<v Speaker 5>I think I might have been because I just thought

2175
01:36:45.159 --> 01:36:47.319
<v Speaker 5>Jane Ryer said like, that's not even an insult.

2176
01:36:47.600 --> 01:36:51.039
<v Speaker 4>But then Sam Shamoon still causing a dryer.

2177
01:36:51.960 --> 01:36:54.199
<v Speaker 3>No, now I'm gay Crier, so he's up to his

2178
01:36:54.359 --> 01:36:56.560
<v Speaker 3>game there, just like, yeah.

2179
01:36:56.359 --> 01:36:59.279
<v Speaker 4>We're at fourth grade level now, But I did. I

2180
01:36:59.359 --> 01:37:01.600
<v Speaker 4>do think jasper Is is funny one.

2181
01:37:01.640 --> 01:37:03.720
<v Speaker 3>It is like a four Well in grade school, I

2182
01:37:03.840 --> 01:37:06.600
<v Speaker 3>was Jay Diarrhea, so wasn't.

2183
01:37:06.560 --> 01:37:09.880
<v Speaker 4>I thought that was oh ingement said Jay Diarrhea.

2184
01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Know what I'm saying that it didn't begin with Benjamin.

2185
01:37:12.640 --> 01:37:14.800
<v Speaker 3>It began in grade school.

2186
01:37:16.039 --> 01:37:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Grade sorry, that was actual grade school?

2187
01:37:18.840 --> 01:37:23.079
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Well yeah, I would say I was trying to

2188
01:37:23.079 --> 01:37:24.159
<v Speaker 5>separate Internet for.

2189
01:37:24.239 --> 01:37:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Reality, but I mixed it in there when I brought

2190
01:37:25.920 --> 01:37:27.960
<v Speaker 4>up to what was that? What's your favorite? Do you

2191
01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:29.560
<v Speaker 4>have a favorite like anshul name?

2192
01:37:30.039 --> 01:37:32.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Jay Diarrhea is just classic because it goes

2193
01:37:32.199 --> 01:37:36.880
<v Speaker 3>back to grade school. So and speaking speaking of speaking,

2194
01:37:37.439 --> 01:37:38.159
<v Speaker 3>do you like how oh?

2195
01:37:38.239 --> 01:37:39.640
<v Speaker 4>And also I had to make like a saw.

2196
01:37:39.760 --> 01:37:41.600
<v Speaker 5>He had to turn it into like a sodomy, things

2197
01:37:41.640 --> 01:37:42.640
<v Speaker 5>like you can't spell.

2198
01:37:42.399 --> 01:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Analysis with when when does he not turn it into

2199
01:37:46.199 --> 01:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pepe poopoo? And that's all I got to Yeah, you

2200
01:37:49.319 --> 01:37:51.159
<v Speaker 1>can't good sodomy all in his mind.

2201
01:37:51.880 --> 01:37:55.359
<v Speaker 4>He had to go there. That was That was funny.

2202
01:37:56.560 --> 01:37:59.159
<v Speaker 3>This might be the highest percentile debate. Yeah, so far,

2203
01:37:59.359 --> 01:38:01.000
<v Speaker 3>And of course it is my audience.

2204
01:38:01.119 --> 01:38:05.439
<v Speaker 1>But right now pulling ninety four percent, there must be

2205
01:38:05.880 --> 01:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>six percent freemasons but locksteps of for ten dollars, I

2206
01:38:09.760 --> 01:38:11.439
<v Speaker 1>literally poot my pants today at the park. Speaking of

2207
01:38:11.479 --> 01:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>poopy stuff, he says, I was playing disc golf. We

2208
01:38:13.600 --> 01:38:16.479
<v Speaker 1>had to stop. Thank you for the strain. I hope

2209
01:38:16.520 --> 01:38:19.279
<v Speaker 1>your guts are okay. Intrinsic five dollars day. Do you

2210
01:38:19.359 --> 01:38:22.399
<v Speaker 1>know anything about You don't know anything. Tiger sauce is

2211
01:38:22.880 --> 01:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that is and it works. So

2212
01:38:26.760 --> 01:38:30.159
<v Speaker 1>he's a fan of Charlie Sheen's Tiger Blood. Apparently it works.

2213
01:38:30.640 --> 01:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Adward twelve dollars is an old clip of Alex talking

2214
01:38:32.920 --> 01:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>about things I can't mention on YouTube.

2215
01:38:35.439 --> 01:38:37.840
<v Speaker 3>He spurgs out. I don't believe Alex is faked, so

2216
01:38:37.920 --> 01:38:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I disagree recking five dollars. Do you see Rouslin sermon?

2217
01:38:41.680 --> 01:38:45.399
<v Speaker 1>He cited Saint John Christistom as if Saint John christistm

2218
01:38:45.439 --> 01:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>supports the teachings of the Rhythm Church. Well, I hope

2219
01:38:49.720 --> 01:38:53.199
<v Speaker 1>people are seeing through the fraud here of the nonsense,

2220
01:38:53.279 --> 01:38:59.479
<v Speaker 1>because Rousseline shared Redeem Zuomer's comment that the Protestant Reformers

2221
01:38:59.800 --> 01:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and the Church Fathers have identical beliefs on everything.

2222
01:39:02.439 --> 01:39:05.239
<v Speaker 3>That's what they said, So not a masaud agent. Ten dollars.

2223
01:39:05.640 --> 01:39:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm at a at my friend's old Protestant church.

2224
01:39:08.560 --> 01:39:11.479
<v Speaker 1>They said west Huff was the best apologist because he'd

2225
01:39:11.479 --> 01:39:12.479
<v Speaker 1>beat Billy Corson.

2226
01:39:13.239 --> 01:39:16.159
<v Speaker 3>I said that west Huff is gay because he won't

2227
01:39:16.159 --> 01:39:18.720
<v Speaker 3>debate anybody. How can you be the best apologist when

2228
01:39:18.760 --> 01:39:21.239
<v Speaker 3>you won't debate anybody, Well, you just debate the one

2229
01:39:21.359 --> 01:39:24.079
<v Speaker 3>lowest hanging fruit, and then you declare yourself the victor.

2230
01:39:24.600 --> 01:39:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Rosie'll find out nobody even.

2231
01:39:26.439 --> 01:39:29.279
<v Speaker 4>Knew Billy Corson was like, I had never even heard

2232
01:39:29.279 --> 01:39:30.039
<v Speaker 4>of Billy Corson.

2233
01:39:30.800 --> 01:39:33.119
<v Speaker 1>No, he was actually he was on a he was

2234
01:39:33.199 --> 01:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on a podcast tour right before he was on Rogan

2235
01:39:36.920 --> 01:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>PbD right before west Huff debated him and pretty much

2236
01:39:40.680 --> 01:39:41.119
<v Speaker 1>ended all.

2237
01:39:41.039 --> 01:39:44.720
<v Speaker 3>That bumblebee five dollars.

2238
01:39:44.760 --> 01:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Rouselo would agree to rap battle or

2239
01:39:46.560 --> 01:39:49.359
<v Speaker 1>would it have to be him battling your catechumen? Yeah,

2240
01:39:49.359 --> 01:39:51.760
<v Speaker 1>he's only going to battle a catechumen, right snake for

2241
01:39:51.960 --> 01:39:52.439
<v Speaker 1>two dollars.

2242
01:39:52.600 --> 01:39:53.079
<v Speaker 4>No, we did that.

2243
01:39:56.319 --> 01:39:57.279
<v Speaker 3>Leave it to Ethan ten dollars.

2244
01:39:57.359 --> 01:39:57.479
<v Speaker 9>Jay.

2245
01:39:57.520 --> 01:40:00.239
<v Speaker 3>The karaoke interview was phenomenal. I really I hope he

2246
01:40:00.279 --> 01:40:02.239
<v Speaker 3>comes back from more conversations. Yeah, I hope so too.

2247
01:40:02.279 --> 01:40:05.439
<v Speaker 3>It was a great, great chat, probably my favorite, one

2248
01:40:05.439 --> 01:40:08.520
<v Speaker 3>of my best interviews. Craftsmen ten dollars, we.

2249
01:40:08.600 --> 01:40:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Did that, Tingu twenty dollars is going to be a

2250
01:40:12.840 --> 01:40:15.760
<v Speaker 1>long night boys, Thank you Frontier. No, we did that,

2251
01:40:21.720 --> 01:40:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Vanilla five dollars. Protestants used Luke twenty four to justify

2252
01:40:25.920 --> 01:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the Protestant.

2253
01:40:26.439 --> 01:40:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Canon because Jesus mentions laws, the prophets, and the psalms.

2254
01:40:32.399 --> 01:40:34.399
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't tell us what the canon is. That's such

2255
01:40:34.439 --> 01:40:35.279
<v Speaker 3>a low tier argument.

2256
01:40:35.359 --> 01:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>That's just assuming that him saying that, I mean, you

2257
01:40:38.720 --> 01:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>can make the same argument that in another verse where

2258
01:40:40.640 --> 01:40:43.359
<v Speaker 1>he says, you know in the law that, oh well,

2259
01:40:43.439 --> 01:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Jesus only says the law. So the canon is only

2260
01:40:45.720 --> 01:40:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the law, right, I mean, it's facilly.

2261
01:40:47.840 --> 01:40:49.640
<v Speaker 3>How do we know? How do we if we're.

2262
01:40:49.560 --> 01:40:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Gonna base our canon on generalized statements of the Old Testament,

2263
01:40:54.760 --> 01:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>how do we know which statement is a canonical statement?

2264
01:40:57.680 --> 01:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we're supposed to be Torah only Christians because Jesus

2265
01:41:00.720 --> 01:41:03.199
<v Speaker 1>says in the Law. Well, the fact that he says

2266
01:41:03.199 --> 01:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>in another verse in the Law, the prophets and the Psalms,

2267
01:41:05.560 --> 01:41:07.720
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing about that that tells us the specific list

2268
01:41:07.760 --> 01:41:08.199
<v Speaker 1>of the canon.

2269
01:41:08.279 --> 01:41:09.000
<v Speaker 3>This is just silly.

2270
01:41:11.960 --> 01:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Tipper Jay, Where do I buy your prayer book? Yeah,

2271
01:41:18.560 --> 01:41:21.039
<v Speaker 1>it's the blue one from Transfiguration Monaster. I don't know

2272
01:41:21.039 --> 01:41:26.479
<v Speaker 1>if you can still get him or not. Joseph ten dollars?

2273
01:41:27.640 --> 01:41:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Will you cover the archangel urials text and fourth Ezra? Uh?

2274
01:41:34.119 --> 01:41:38.319
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I never thought about that. There's a response on

2275
01:41:38.359 --> 01:41:42.239
<v Speaker 3>the Mystery of Suffering. It mirrors the response to job. Interesting.

2276
01:41:43.319 --> 01:41:45.720
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long time since I read any of

2277
01:41:45.800 --> 01:41:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the deuterocononical historical texts. I mean I was actually I

2278
01:41:50.239 --> 01:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>did reread Sirich recently, and I read reread Wisdom, but

2279
01:41:55.800 --> 01:41:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't read judahth or Toba or Maccabee's or as

2280
01:42:00.079 --> 01:42:01.039
<v Speaker 1>us or any of those in a long time.

2281
01:42:01.079 --> 01:42:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Soday, I should go back to those A million oh

2282
01:42:02.640 --> 01:42:06.079
<v Speaker 3>five dollars. Thank you for your content. I'm writing a

2283
01:42:06.159 --> 01:42:10.439
<v Speaker 3>paper on the Big Z for my pastor. You have

2284
01:42:10.520 --> 01:42:12.039
<v Speaker 3>books on the history of the Big Z.

2285
01:42:12.399 --> 01:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, the best one is roth Chill's biography by Morton,

2286
01:42:16.399 --> 01:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Moses has his book Jerusalem and Athens.

2287
01:42:21.520 --> 01:42:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Nick, ten dollars. In the scope of you two, you

2288
01:42:24.800 --> 01:42:29.039
<v Speaker 3>have two hundred k. Rouselm has eight hundred k. They're

2289
01:42:29.119 --> 01:42:31.880
<v Speaker 3>not far apart. Uh, what do you mean? Not far apart?

2290
01:42:31.960 --> 01:42:35.640
<v Speaker 3>We're blowing them away. What are you talking about? Simple things?

2291
01:42:35.680 --> 01:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Pointing out that we're meant to be in nature of

2292
01:42:37.600 --> 01:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>me Nashville, and this is where we find the source

2293
01:42:39.680 --> 01:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that God made you transcend the new world order. And

2294
01:42:42.600 --> 01:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>that's why the one trying to keep us agree.

2295
01:42:48.319 --> 01:42:53.720
<v Speaker 3>I've had these people there, a bunch of Christian murderings,

2296
01:42:53.800 --> 01:42:57.640
<v Speaker 3>coms death back just keeping baby is alive.

2297
01:43:01.079 --> 01:43:02.880
<v Speaker 4>He needed all about these people.

2298
01:43:03.520 --> 01:43:08.119
<v Speaker 13>I go round to taste these stones and literally crawl

2299
01:43:08.199 --> 01:43:09.840
<v Speaker 13>out from a box and.

2300
01:43:10.960 --> 01:43:16.279
<v Speaker 14>Skin and ruating we want babies.

2301
01:43:18.520 --> 01:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I had them on the all.

2302
01:43:22.520 --> 01:43:28.039
<v Speaker 3>Right, that's not bad, No, Nick, We're blowing away.

2303
01:43:29.359 --> 01:43:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Is right happened?

2304
01:43:29.960 --> 01:43:30.479
<v Speaker 3>Okay, here we go.

2305
01:43:31.920 --> 01:43:32.800
<v Speaker 4>You resist the.

2306
01:43:32.920 --> 01:43:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Creepy weird six set up.

2307
01:43:34.800 --> 01:43:41.920
<v Speaker 14>Man, she sleeps in the same room with that creepy

2308
01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:44.520
<v Speaker 14>weird a woman who's mother wizzard.

2309
01:43:44.199 --> 01:43:45.479
<v Speaker 4>Hood over her head.

2310
01:43:47.119 --> 01:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>The woman noble.

2311
01:43:48.319 --> 01:43:49.560
<v Speaker 15>Woe is ugly.

2312
01:43:51.039 --> 01:43:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Imagine how bad she smells.

2313
01:43:53.359 --> 01:43:59.439
<v Speaker 14>Man, I'm told her head Obama, just stick Obama and

2314
01:43:59.600 --> 01:44:01.640
<v Speaker 14>you reports.

2315
01:44:01.039 --> 01:44:02.800
<v Speaker 9>And a sofa.

2316
01:44:10.479 --> 01:44:12.920
<v Speaker 4>In help fire About there.

2317
01:44:13.119 --> 01:44:18.880
<v Speaker 14>The captains holding around the after rose, steering.

2318
01:44:18.479 --> 01:44:22.039
<v Speaker 4>Against close to that evil head up heeling gold.

2319
01:44:23.880 --> 01:44:30.920
<v Speaker 15>Are such self serer crap we don't even know it

2320
01:44:31.079 --> 01:44:36.439
<v Speaker 15>head itself rising up against the billions of parting.

2321
01:44:36.119 --> 01:44:39.760
<v Speaker 14>The people of the very worst stapp Man, I'm so

2322
01:44:40.239 --> 01:44:46.960
<v Speaker 14>dis We're gonna stab your daughter at the moment. Oh

2323
01:44:47.720 --> 01:44:50.960
<v Speaker 14>oh oh, I'm gonna.

2324
01:44:50.720 --> 01:44:52.039
<v Speaker 4>Stab your wealth.

2325
01:44:52.199 --> 01:44:59.760
<v Speaker 14>Yes, we're gonna stab you with the budget.

2326
01:45:00.640 --> 01:45:07.119
<v Speaker 1>And then ladies Jesus going to say we know we

2327
01:45:07.399 --> 01:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>love our Muslims.

2328
01:45:09.039 --> 01:45:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

2329
01:45:12.800 --> 01:45:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Bond Ever thought they were going to really get at

2330
01:45:15.880 --> 01:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Alex with that satire and it ended up being like

2331
01:45:18.640 --> 01:45:20.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty million views on that song.

2332
01:45:21.119 --> 01:45:23.319
<v Speaker 4>Bony Be didn't do that. That was like a honeion

2333
01:45:23.439 --> 01:45:26.079
<v Speaker 4>type thing that they did. It was some game turn.

2334
01:45:27.560 --> 01:45:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Type as yeah, yeah, it's not bonny Bear.

2335
01:45:33.680 --> 01:45:36.039
<v Speaker 5>It's it's super well done and they innitated a style

2336
01:45:36.159 --> 01:45:36.760
<v Speaker 5>like perfectly.

2337
01:45:37.159 --> 01:45:40.079
<v Speaker 1>But it's not it's this whole All this time, I

2338
01:45:40.119 --> 01:45:41.760
<v Speaker 1>thought it was let's see, because it sounds like that,

2339
01:45:41.960 --> 01:45:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we'll see.

2340
01:45:42.960 --> 01:45:45.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm thinking intern it was like somebody. It wasn't even

2341
01:45:46.920 --> 01:45:49.119
<v Speaker 4>you know, didn't comedian or anything. I think it was

2342
01:45:50.640 --> 01:45:53.359
<v Speaker 4>obviously a few people wrote that together and didn't write it,

2343
01:45:53.479 --> 01:45:57.920
<v Speaker 4>but it found really good clips. I mean it also shows,

2344
01:45:57.960 --> 01:45:59.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they really proved.

2345
01:45:58.840 --> 01:46:02.000
<v Speaker 5>That Alex is just legitimately like one of the best

2346
01:46:02.680 --> 01:46:07.399
<v Speaker 5>modern poets. Literal vampire pop elly goblins are hobbling.

2347
01:46:07.079 --> 01:46:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Around coming after Its like you don't even have to

2348
01:46:11.720 --> 01:46:12.039
<v Speaker 4>sing it.

2349
01:46:12.119 --> 01:46:15.880
<v Speaker 5>It just sounds so literal vampire pop belly goblins are

2350
01:46:15.960 --> 01:46:20.640
<v Speaker 5>hobbling around coming after Okay, So Sander crap, we.

2351
01:46:20.680 --> 01:46:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Don't even notice hell itself rising up against us.

2352
01:46:24.199 --> 01:46:25.560
<v Speaker 3>So Nick, you're right.

2353
01:46:25.600 --> 01:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a guy named Nick lutz Lutskow, a comedian and singer. Okay,

2354
01:46:33.239 --> 01:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard of this guy, Nick lutz Lutskow. He's

2355
01:46:42.960 --> 01:46:45.359
<v Speaker 1>not even like capitalizing on it's like his biggest thing,

2356
01:46:45.439 --> 01:46:48.159
<v Speaker 1>and he's not even like capitalizing on it. Let's see

2357
01:46:48.159 --> 01:46:51.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's got it on his channel, Nick Lutzkow.

2358
01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:56.680
<v Speaker 4>And the thing is, it's all Alex, right, I mean

2359
01:46:56.760 --> 01:46:59.279
<v Speaker 4>Alex wrote all those lines, and every one of the

2360
01:46:59.359 --> 01:47:03.560
<v Speaker 4>lines that's in it was so good. Yeah, he's he's

2361
01:47:04.279 --> 01:47:07.520
<v Speaker 4>at that point with the time period where those uh,

2362
01:47:07.800 --> 01:47:10.399
<v Speaker 4>where this cliff came from. He was such a good wordsmith.

2363
01:47:10.479 --> 01:47:11.640
<v Speaker 4>He has he's lost his uh.

2364
01:47:12.159 --> 01:47:15.159
<v Speaker 5>I think he's he used up all his words because

2365
01:47:15.199 --> 01:47:19.000
<v Speaker 5>he's there was a time when he was just so funny.

2366
01:47:19.039 --> 01:47:23.279
<v Speaker 4>Man, he was so funny. I still like Alex, but yeah,

2367
01:47:23.319 --> 01:47:25.279
<v Speaker 4>it was there was there was a period where he

2368
01:47:25.439 --> 01:47:26.399
<v Speaker 4>was just on fire.

2369
01:47:27.319 --> 01:47:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Egman two dollars.

2370
01:47:28.840 --> 01:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't comment on that because I haven't read enough

2371
01:47:30.960 --> 01:47:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of other Stephen Young in the in the in the

2372
01:47:32.840 --> 01:47:37.119
<v Speaker 1>text to say so, I don't know roziel I message

2373
01:47:37.159 --> 01:47:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you on Discord.

2374
01:47:38.119 --> 01:47:38.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll check it out.

2375
01:47:39.039 --> 01:47:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Great Scott uh says, here's a little money for the

2376
01:47:43.119 --> 01:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>stain remover for that shirt.

2377
01:47:44.800 --> 01:47:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll spit the coffee out on my shirt earlier.

2378
01:47:51.640 --> 01:47:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Great Scott says, you use some club soda, it'll get

2379
01:47:54.319 --> 01:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the staining out. President Retard twenty dollars. Tristanna Diva Mogg's Jay,

2380
01:47:59.239 --> 01:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh my.

2381
01:47:59.600 --> 01:48:02.079
<v Speaker 3>Gosh, that's not true. I can't believe you said that

2382
01:48:03.159 --> 01:48:05.039
<v Speaker 3>Tristan is the songbird of a generation.

2383
01:48:05.239 --> 01:48:09.479
<v Speaker 4>Wow. Wow Is that a separate superhad or that was

2384
01:48:09.560 --> 01:48:10.880
<v Speaker 4>just one superchand.

2385
01:48:10.439 --> 01:48:13.800
<v Speaker 3>No, that was one guy. You have a one super

2386
01:48:13.840 --> 01:48:14.640
<v Speaker 3>fan in the audience.

2387
01:48:14.920 --> 01:48:17.560
<v Speaker 4>I can't refute that. I mean I would try. I can't.

2388
01:48:19.399 --> 01:48:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Emilia and twenty dollars, Jay, what book you recommend on

2389
01:48:22.399 --> 01:48:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Rome changing church Father texts and forgeries? Uh?

2390
01:48:25.680 --> 01:48:29.359
<v Speaker 3>The two volume set that Uncut Mountain put out, Uh,

2391
01:48:29.800 --> 01:48:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Latin Error's Blame one and Blame two.

2392
01:48:31.600 --> 01:48:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I forget which volume has the the sections of the forgeries.

2393
01:48:35.279 --> 01:48:38.439
<v Speaker 1>But uh, George whom we interviewed on the channel, you

2394
01:48:38.439 --> 01:48:40.399
<v Speaker 1>can find an interview on that. He's pretty much the

2395
01:48:40.439 --> 01:48:42.119
<v Speaker 1>guy who just kind of went all into that.

2396
01:48:44.199 --> 01:48:49.119
<v Speaker 3>Would it help with the Philly Okuay That one will

2397
01:48:49.159 --> 01:48:49.560
<v Speaker 3>deal with that.

2398
01:48:50.199 --> 01:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>But the Philly Oquay book had to read Sashchensky's book

2399
01:48:53.199 --> 01:48:54.159
<v Speaker 1>on the Philly ok Way too.

2400
01:48:54.680 --> 01:48:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Sergi has five dollars.

2401
01:48:56.800 --> 01:49:00.000
<v Speaker 1>John Adams doesn't get enough props, good recommendations from him.

2402
01:49:00.079 --> 01:49:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's a great Uh.

2403
01:49:01.319 --> 01:49:03.439
<v Speaker 1>In fact, mat him on the on the trip out

2404
01:49:03.520 --> 01:49:06.319
<v Speaker 1>to California and he gave me a big old stack

2405
01:49:06.359 --> 01:49:11.439
<v Speaker 1>of books, so he's always given out books. I can

2406
01:49:11.560 --> 01:49:13.399
<v Speaker 1>him as sisteen dollars. The Masons sound like they're a

2407
01:49:13.399 --> 01:49:15.159
<v Speaker 1>blend of new agers who pretend to be fancier and

2408
01:49:15.239 --> 01:49:18.439
<v Speaker 1>smarter than they are. Maybe I'm wrong, No, and the New.

2409
01:49:18.399 --> 01:49:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Age actually comes out of Masonry.

2410
01:49:19.720 --> 01:49:22.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Madame Levatski wrote an article back at the

2411
01:49:22.720 --> 01:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>turn of the last century for the Scottish Rite Journal,

2412
01:49:26.479 --> 01:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>which is a Masonic journal, saying that Masonry would be

2413
01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:33.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of the era of the religion of the future,

2414
01:49:33.239 --> 01:49:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so to speak.

2415
01:49:34.800 --> 01:49:39.399
<v Speaker 4>And then also in the Sri publication.

2416
01:49:40.800 --> 01:49:44.399
<v Speaker 3>Was it called what's the changing Changing Images of Man?

2417
01:49:45.319 --> 01:49:48.399
<v Speaker 4>Changing Images of Man? Yeah, the last few chapters of that,

2418
01:49:48.439 --> 01:49:50.039
<v Speaker 4>I think if he's the last few chapters.

2419
01:49:50.520 --> 01:49:54.439
<v Speaker 5>Basically their model for the future man and how you

2420
01:49:54.720 --> 01:49:56.840
<v Speaker 5>structure society is Freemasonry.

2421
01:49:58.199 --> 01:49:58.399
<v Speaker 3>MATD.

2422
01:49:58.479 --> 01:50:02.079
<v Speaker 1>Burns says rouslan Ak, the failed rapper Jay Rock is

2423
01:50:02.159 --> 01:50:05.479
<v Speaker 1>co opting Orthodox Christianity because he knows that his grip

2424
01:50:05.640 --> 01:50:06.399
<v Speaker 1>is now exposed.

2425
01:50:06.479 --> 01:50:09.960
<v Speaker 3>This is the natural progression once people get exposed, it

2426
01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:10.880
<v Speaker 3>seems to be the case.

2427
01:50:13.159 --> 01:50:16.359
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, like I'll never stop going against

2428
01:50:16.399 --> 01:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys once you you know, try to do this

2429
01:50:18.680 --> 01:50:20.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff to me, like, I'm not donna stop,

2430
01:50:20.880 --> 01:50:23.199
<v Speaker 1>so we'll be like Alex Jones over here, I'll keep going.

2431
01:50:23.720 --> 01:50:29.479
<v Speaker 3>JB five dollars the biggest EVA again, I think that's

2432
01:50:29.520 --> 01:50:31.560
<v Speaker 3>already been decided a long time ago.

2433
01:50:31.800 --> 01:50:34.039
<v Speaker 5>So well, I mean, I don't see any super chess

2434
01:50:34.159 --> 01:50:34.640
<v Speaker 5>backing up.

2435
01:50:34.760 --> 01:50:36.039
<v Speaker 4>You're a good claim, But that's.

2436
01:50:35.920 --> 01:50:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Fine, Tristan.

2437
01:50:37.039 --> 01:50:39.039
<v Speaker 1>I sent that one in under a soccer account to

2438
01:50:39.079 --> 01:50:40.880
<v Speaker 1>make you feel better, just so you would come back

2439
01:50:40.920 --> 01:50:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to the streams.

2440
01:50:42.319 --> 01:50:44.439
<v Speaker 3>I did that so you come back to these streams, dude.

2441
01:50:44.479 --> 01:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Come on, Uh, let's see we got JB says that

2442
01:50:53.960 --> 01:50:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Masonic position is demonic.

2443
01:50:55.920 --> 01:51:00.760
<v Speaker 3>They're blatant relativists. It was implied, but decidedly acknowledged in

2444
01:51:00.880 --> 01:51:04.319
<v Speaker 3>the debate. Yeah, I think that. I think they did constantly.

2445
01:51:04.359 --> 01:51:07.279
<v Speaker 3>They wasn't just implied, They multiple times were relativistic in

2446
01:51:07.319 --> 01:51:10.520
<v Speaker 3>their arguments. But Guru ten dollars, I was a retarded

2447
01:51:10.600 --> 01:51:13.840
<v Speaker 3>vegan for seven years, not that I ever liked that clown,

2448
01:51:14.079 --> 01:51:16.640
<v Speaker 3>but I love the debate that you have with Vegan gains.

2449
01:51:16.319 --> 01:51:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day. Through with Tristan. That's how I

2450
01:51:18.840 --> 01:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>discovered you and how I got back into good stuff.

2451
01:51:21.640 --> 01:51:25.239
<v Speaker 3>That's good. It's how I've seen you. It's good to

2452
01:51:25.279 --> 01:51:28.439
<v Speaker 3>see that you've climbed since. Thank you. Yeah. In fact,

2453
01:51:28.479 --> 01:51:29.159
<v Speaker 3>that was one of the.

2454
01:51:29.159 --> 01:51:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Early debates was actually me and triest in versus ask

2455
01:51:32.279 --> 01:51:34.039
<v Speaker 1>yourself in Vegan Gains Remember those days.

2456
01:51:35.119 --> 01:51:37.560
<v Speaker 4>That was such a funny people still laugh about. But

2457
01:51:38.119 --> 01:51:39.920
<v Speaker 4>some of my like i OL friends.

2458
01:51:39.680 --> 01:51:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Still the fact, the fact, the fact, the fact, the fact,

2459
01:51:43.920 --> 01:51:44.840
<v Speaker 3>the fact, the fact.

2460
01:51:46.479 --> 01:51:49.840
<v Speaker 5>They both short circuited so badly. I actually I forgot

2461
01:51:49.880 --> 01:51:52.239
<v Speaker 5>how much I interacted with Vegan Gains. I had so

2462
01:51:52.439 --> 01:51:55.560
<v Speaker 5>many So I had a lot of interactions with Vegan

2463
01:51:55.600 --> 01:51:56.960
<v Speaker 5>Gates over the years.

2464
01:51:57.840 --> 01:52:00.560
<v Speaker 4>He still makes videos. I guess he's still around.

2465
01:52:01.600 --> 01:52:04.840
<v Speaker 1>He hopped into the debate that I did with Gnostic

2466
01:52:04.920 --> 01:52:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Informant and tried to mog Christianity by saying that his

2467
01:52:09.159 --> 01:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>god is crom like Conan's.

2468
01:52:13.359 --> 01:52:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was so stupid.

2469
01:52:15.279 --> 01:52:16.680
<v Speaker 15>I mean it's been this was.

2470
01:52:16.680 --> 01:52:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Almost ten years ago.

2471
01:52:17.680 --> 01:52:20.399
<v Speaker 3>It was a twenty eighteen or seven years twenty. I

2472
01:52:20.439 --> 01:52:22.199
<v Speaker 3>think it was twenty eighteen, twenty eighteen year.

2473
01:52:23.159 --> 01:52:25.800
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, we're eight years and he's still got a

2474
01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:27.359
<v Speaker 5>narcissistic wound from it.

2475
01:52:32.079 --> 01:52:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Sleeping gay Scuping Zebra five dollars. Patriarch Carol, how would

2476
01:52:39.079 --> 01:52:43.199
<v Speaker 1>you respond to reports of corruption? You're asking me if

2477
01:52:43.239 --> 01:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I was patriarch Carol?

2478
01:52:44.279 --> 01:52:45.960
<v Speaker 3>How whatever? Spawn I'll understand the question.

2479
01:52:46.319 --> 01:52:48.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about blessing a weapon during a war?

2480
01:52:48.720 --> 01:52:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean Orthodox Church has always blessed the soldiers and

2481
01:52:51.159 --> 01:52:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the weapons. Chase ten dollars. I was sold by Masons

2482
01:52:54.399 --> 01:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>that it's an allegory for fraternal use the way that

2483
01:52:58.399 --> 01:53:00.119
<v Speaker 1>college scholarships use is to say.

2484
01:53:01.439 --> 01:53:03.880
<v Speaker 3>And that thus would induct you through the symbolism.

2485
01:53:05.560 --> 01:53:06.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one.

2486
01:53:06.760 --> 01:53:10.319
<v Speaker 3>So what is Jabulin. It's it's a religious I mean

2487
01:53:10.359 --> 01:53:14.800
<v Speaker 3>they're using syncretistic principles to create secret societies that are

2488
01:53:14.840 --> 01:53:19.000
<v Speaker 3>so supposedly supra religious and supra national.

2489
01:53:19.119 --> 01:53:19.239
<v Speaker 9>Right.

2490
01:53:19.279 --> 01:53:21.439
<v Speaker 3>That's why it's an international body organization.

2491
01:53:22.600 --> 01:53:26.319
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that they liken it to a college

2492
01:53:26.359 --> 01:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>fraternity has nothing to do with whether or not it's

2493
01:53:30.640 --> 01:53:34.199
<v Speaker 1>actually religiously committed and it's commitment and its positions. And

2494
01:53:34.239 --> 01:53:36.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what I argued in the debate I think successfully.

2495
01:53:36.880 --> 01:53:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that you're saying, and this is what.

2496
01:53:38.920 --> 01:53:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Almost everybody did, right, Like almost everybody who's defended it

2497
01:53:43.680 --> 01:53:47.039
<v Speaker 3>or argued for it says even the guys that came

2498
01:53:47.119 --> 01:53:48.479
<v Speaker 3>up at the end of the questions are like, how

2499
01:53:48.600 --> 01:53:52.199
<v Speaker 3>is this any different than joining a corporation that is secular.

2500
01:53:52.760 --> 01:53:54.920
<v Speaker 3>The whole argument is that it's not secular, and that

2501
01:53:55.079 --> 01:53:57.079
<v Speaker 3>you keep saying it secular, but then you go back

2502
01:53:57.119 --> 01:54:00.319
<v Speaker 3>to saying, here's all these religious positions is that you

2503
01:54:00.399 --> 01:54:02.039
<v Speaker 3>got to have to not be excluded.

2504
01:54:02.199 --> 01:54:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Proves the point. It's like, this argument just flies over

2505
01:54:06.800 --> 01:54:08.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone's head and I'm not being mean to you.

2506
01:54:09.039 --> 01:54:10.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's Chase Geyser.

2507
01:54:10.319 --> 01:54:14.880
<v Speaker 1>But what about Leo Taxo admitting that he lied about Mason's. Well,

2508
01:54:14.920 --> 01:54:16.760
<v Speaker 1>what does that have to do with any of my arguments?

2509
01:54:16.960 --> 01:54:17.239
<v Speaker 3>All right?

2510
01:54:17.319 --> 01:54:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's as fallacy of irrelevance. It's not relevant

2511
01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:26.039
<v Speaker 1>to if somebody lie. If somebody lied about Christianity, that

2512
01:54:26.159 --> 01:54:29.760
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with proving Christianity, right, So like, uh,

2513
01:54:31.319 --> 01:54:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I prove that, uh, this is the fallacy fallas Right.

2514
01:54:34.800 --> 01:54:38.359
<v Speaker 1>So if if Richard Dawkins writes a book and somebody

2515
01:54:38.399 --> 01:54:41.079
<v Speaker 1>exposes that he made up all these quotes and lied

2516
01:54:41.079 --> 01:54:43.479
<v Speaker 1>about Christianity, that would improve Christianity.

2517
01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:44.119
<v Speaker 9>Right.

2518
01:54:44.239 --> 01:54:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So Leo Taxil making up lies about Mason's doesn't mean

2519
01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Masonry is.

2520
01:54:48.560 --> 01:54:54.199
<v Speaker 3>Therefore good and not still a subject to critique. Look

2521
01:54:54.279 --> 01:54:54.960
<v Speaker 3>up the fallacy.

2522
01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Fallacy chronicles the Freemason in the space sound retarded ice Wolf.

2523
01:55:02.840 --> 01:55:07.119
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. I will eventually convey this to my father.

2524
01:55:09.640 --> 01:55:11.439
<v Speaker 3>It convey what you miss them and I must miss

2525
01:55:11.439 --> 01:55:12.800
<v Speaker 3>something talking about some earlier I don't rember what you're

2526
01:55:12.800 --> 01:55:17.119
<v Speaker 3>talking about. Not a Massaud agent says, for ten dollars,

2527
01:55:17.199 --> 01:55:19.760
<v Speaker 3>it sounds like they're Masonic Supreme Being is part of

2528
01:55:19.920 --> 01:55:27.399
<v Speaker 3>the non binary, non identifiable, non gender community. Actually, in the.

2529
01:55:27.520 --> 01:55:31.039
<v Speaker 1>Masonic text they say that it's Adam Cadman and it's bisexual.

2530
01:55:31.680 --> 01:55:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So as you heard me offer as an argument at

2531
01:55:35.039 --> 01:55:37.039
<v Speaker 1>the by the way, they never addressed the yone argument

2532
01:55:37.039 --> 01:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>at the very beginning that they worship PEPs and the

2533
01:55:39.119 --> 01:55:41.840
<v Speaker 1>JJ's exactly.

2534
01:55:42.960 --> 01:55:47.399
<v Speaker 4>So they admit in their own system that Freemasonry is fake,

2535
01:55:47.560 --> 01:55:48.479
<v Speaker 4>gay and Jewish.

2536
01:55:51.960 --> 01:55:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you say, if you want to say that,

2537
01:55:54.680 --> 01:55:57.239
<v Speaker 1>direct to people to go to the Zohar to figure

2538
01:55:57.279 --> 01:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>out who God is is Jewish, that's up to you.

2539
01:55:59.359 --> 01:56:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Tristan Consequently, he said, coincide. Coincidentally, he says that this

2540
01:56:08.159 --> 01:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is also the ven number to a twenty eleven explorer,

2541
01:56:10.760 --> 01:56:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the m M I w G two s Joel LBG

2542
01:56:13.800 --> 01:56:17.560
<v Speaker 1>t q q I a community TINGU twenty five dollars.

2543
01:56:17.600 --> 01:56:19.600
<v Speaker 1>If you could sit down for a couple hours to

2544
01:56:19.640 --> 01:56:22.199
<v Speaker 1>talk to anybody from history that isn't Jesus, who would

2545
01:56:22.279 --> 01:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you pick?

2546
01:56:24.079 --> 01:56:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, Tristan, after we die, how's that energetic distinction?

2547
01:56:32.920 --> 01:56:34.319
<v Speaker 4>But I think that's just a death threat.

2548
01:56:34.640 --> 01:56:37.159
<v Speaker 3>No, it's not. It's okay, Candice. I know you think

2549
01:56:37.199 --> 01:56:38.479
<v Speaker 3>everything is a threat against you.

2550
01:56:38.560 --> 01:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly, but it's the gang Stalkers exactly, the gang shovistaraty. There,

2551
01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:48.039
<v Speaker 1>I've sent the hitman, and in Tristan's gonna I'm gonna

2552
01:56:48.079 --> 01:56:49.760
<v Speaker 1>regret it, and then I'm gonna wish that I could

2553
01:56:49.800 --> 01:56:50.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to Trustan afterwards.

2554
01:56:50.920 --> 01:56:54.239
<v Speaker 4>But the top of the top diva, I'm the top

2555
01:56:54.319 --> 01:56:59.359
<v Speaker 4>t I'm the top target targeted individual diva and there

2556
01:56:59.399 --> 01:56:59.720
<v Speaker 4>after me.

2557
01:57:00.159 --> 01:57:03.760
<v Speaker 3>But climbing to the top requires ruthlessness. And if I'm

2558
01:57:03.760 --> 01:57:07.359
<v Speaker 3>going to be the top of diva, sometimes sometimes you know,

2559
01:57:07.520 --> 01:57:09.640
<v Speaker 3>something might happen to the competition. I don't know.

2560
01:57:10.760 --> 01:57:12.239
<v Speaker 1>That's a joke, by the way, where people try to

2561
01:57:12.239 --> 01:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>full the stream energetic distinction of dollars, How do we

2562
01:57:14.720 --> 01:57:15.560
<v Speaker 1>get our family.

2563
01:57:15.319 --> 01:57:17.239
<v Speaker 3>To understand that Masonry is Satanic?

2564
01:57:17.359 --> 01:57:17.479
<v Speaker 4>Is it?

2565
01:57:17.680 --> 01:57:20.880
<v Speaker 3>And it's a different alter than God's. I mean, do

2566
01:57:20.960 --> 01:57:24.960
<v Speaker 3>you not think that? I mean, the debate debate not

2567
01:57:25.079 --> 01:57:25.359
<v Speaker 3>show that.

2568
01:57:25.479 --> 01:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you don't believe that, if you can't

2569
01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:31.239
<v Speaker 1>see that relativism is the Satanic point, then your your

2570
01:57:31.439 --> 01:57:33.960
<v Speaker 1>your family's just going to be Normies like every other

2571
01:57:34.039 --> 01:57:36.680
<v Speaker 1>normy because all the normies are all relativest.

2572
01:57:37.159 --> 01:57:39.239
<v Speaker 3>That's your truth, man, it's true for you. It's true

2573
01:57:39.279 --> 01:57:39.920
<v Speaker 3>for you, dude.

2574
01:57:40.439 --> 01:57:44.239
<v Speaker 1>That's like basic bitch normy right there. And the Masons

2575
01:57:44.239 --> 01:57:45.720
<v Speaker 1>are basically saying that throughout the debate.

2576
01:57:45.840 --> 01:57:47.560
<v Speaker 3>So Altar boy, five dollars, what.

2577
01:57:47.600 --> 01:57:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying if the cops say I'm not driving drunk,

2578
01:57:51.399 --> 01:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but my actions are that I was driving drunk. I

2579
01:57:55.800 --> 01:57:57.720
<v Speaker 1>guess you're talking about the Masons, Like if they're saying

2580
01:57:57.800 --> 01:58:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not denying Christ by joining us society that denies

2581
01:58:00.840 --> 01:58:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Christ because I still believe in Christ. Right, I caught

2582
01:58:03.159 --> 01:58:05.159
<v Speaker 1>him at ten dollars. John says, anyone denies the deed

2583
01:58:05.199 --> 01:58:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of Christ is Antichrist, exactly as we say against the Muslims.

2584
01:58:08.319 --> 01:58:11.399
<v Speaker 1>So is it fair to say that Masonry is Antichrist? Yes, exactly,

2585
01:58:11.600 --> 01:58:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just like Islam serge, Yes, five dollars damn. Ecumenism is

2586
01:58:16.039 --> 01:58:18.720
<v Speaker 1>pressing in from every angle, kind of terrifying what you

2587
01:58:18.760 --> 01:58:21.600
<v Speaker 1>start noticing and recognize. Yeah, it's the same position as Ruslin,

2588
01:58:21.720 --> 01:58:25.640
<v Speaker 1>redeem Zomer, Trent Horn, all the humanists, the Freemasons, they

2589
01:58:25.680 --> 01:58:28.439
<v Speaker 1>have the same position. Nobody can say what Christianity is,

2590
01:58:28.520 --> 01:58:32.199
<v Speaker 1>although they can say what masonry is. If you saw

2591
01:58:32.279 --> 01:58:34.319
<v Speaker 1>we saw that pointed out in the debate. They can

2592
01:58:34.399 --> 01:58:37.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you who's a regular and irregular lodge, but Chase

2593
01:58:37.760 --> 01:58:39.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't tell you who isn't isn't a Christian in terms

2594
01:58:39.600 --> 01:58:40.479
<v Speaker 1>of historical bodies.

2595
01:58:40.760 --> 01:58:45.920
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was absurd in the debate. D jewels

2596
01:58:45.960 --> 01:58:48.960
<v Speaker 3>five dollars day. It's interesting that you aren't tagged on

2597
01:58:49.000 --> 01:58:50.920
<v Speaker 3>that video and there's a bunch of edits. Yeah. I

2598
01:58:51.000 --> 01:58:53.359
<v Speaker 3>don't know why DJ did that. Maybe he may be.

2599
01:58:53.479 --> 01:58:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Working with Chase. Chase moved to Nashville, so they might

2600
01:58:56.239 --> 01:59:02.920
<v Speaker 1>have work that they're doing together. I don't think he was.

2601
01:59:03.039 --> 01:59:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I didn't notice him cutting out any substantial

2602
01:59:05.560 --> 01:59:08.239
<v Speaker 1>debate points, So I'm not accusing DJ of doing anything

2603
01:59:09.239 --> 01:59:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in that regard because that was everything that I remember

2604
01:59:13.000 --> 01:59:15.760
<v Speaker 1>from the debate. So they didn't edit anything out of

2605
01:59:15.760 --> 01:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the debate, except that they just even the audio levels

2606
01:59:17.920 --> 01:59:20.640
<v Speaker 1>so that we weren't getting really loud and you didn't

2607
01:59:20.680 --> 01:59:23.399
<v Speaker 1>hear the audience laughing when I was making fun of

2608
01:59:23.439 --> 01:59:25.680
<v Speaker 1>them at several points. But I kind of wish they'd

2609
01:59:25.720 --> 01:59:32.600
<v Speaker 1>kept that in Illuminati Checkboard Flooring twenty dollars Doing a

2610
01:59:33.479 --> 01:59:36.880
<v Speaker 1>R storiography the OSS and CAA. Have you covered Donovan

2611
01:59:37.399 --> 01:59:41.800
<v Speaker 1>by the CAA Thomas Troy. It's very dry compared to

2612
01:59:41.800 --> 01:59:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the old boys, but good stuff.

2613
01:59:42.920 --> 01:59:43.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't have.

2614
01:59:43.319 --> 01:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple biographies of will Build Donovan, and

2615
01:59:45.760 --> 01:59:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I have his own autobiography, but I don't have that.

2616
01:59:47.399 --> 01:59:52.000
<v Speaker 4>No, that's a big project. I mean a historiography, like

2617
01:59:52.159 --> 01:59:54.840
<v Speaker 4>if it's going to be exhausted, that's going to be.

2618
01:59:54.920 --> 01:59:56.359
<v Speaker 3>Like I mean, yeah, like.

2619
01:59:58.399 --> 02:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to write a book on geopolitics and espionage.

2620
02:00:01.720 --> 02:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is that it would just be so

2621
02:00:03.920 --> 02:00:07.399
<v Speaker 1>difficult to to figure out how to do it, and

2622
02:00:07.479 --> 02:00:09.159
<v Speaker 1>it would be so much work. And then then you

2623
02:00:09.239 --> 02:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have to think, will anybody even buy this? I don't

2624
02:00:11.640 --> 02:00:12.359
<v Speaker 1>even know that they would.

2625
02:00:12.479 --> 02:00:16.039
<v Speaker 4>You have to pick, you know, think of like one

2626
02:00:16.159 --> 02:00:18.800
<v Speaker 4>chapter you would do in that book, and that's a book.

2627
02:00:19.560 --> 02:00:21.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I might have to like I might have to

2628
02:00:21.399 --> 02:00:25.239
<v Speaker 3>like narrow it down to like uh, espionage and the church,

2629
02:00:25.640 --> 02:00:27.720
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean something like that, or really.

2630
02:00:27.600 --> 02:00:30.720
<v Speaker 4>YE think if you do a broad a broad take

2631
02:00:30.800 --> 02:00:32.920
<v Speaker 4>on it, it's it's impossible. It's gonna end up being

2632
02:00:33.000 --> 02:00:36.359
<v Speaker 4>like a you know, three one thousand page volumes.

2633
02:00:38.039 --> 02:00:39.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, i'd be like a life's work.

2634
02:00:39.319 --> 02:00:45.000
<v Speaker 4>There's a complete historiography on OS s c. I A, yeah,

2635
02:00:45.159 --> 02:00:49.479
<v Speaker 4>and written about things in twentieth century history.

2636
02:00:49.399 --> 02:00:51.119
<v Speaker 3>Right, exactly material.

2637
02:00:51.359 --> 02:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember the my French Revolution professor when I was

2638
02:00:55.079 --> 02:01:00.119
<v Speaker 1>in the undergrad the French Revolution professor, he said that

2639
02:01:01.039 --> 02:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>no event And I think you wanted to say because

2640
02:01:04.680 --> 02:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's so long since the French Revolution. I think

2641
02:01:08.760 --> 02:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that and this was way after the Big nine event.

2642
02:01:10.640 --> 02:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I think he said that no event even world War two,

2643
02:01:13.199 --> 02:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that like maybe it was World War two in French Revolution,

2644
02:01:16.880 --> 02:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>like you could never read all the books that have

2645
02:01:18.439 --> 02:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>been written on those two events.

2646
02:01:21.000 --> 02:01:29.039
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, that's that. Tracks that makes sense.

2647
02:01:30.640 --> 02:01:31.199
<v Speaker 3>Death takes.

2648
02:01:31.359 --> 02:01:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to the shape story. Do you need anything?

2649
02:01:34.760 --> 02:01:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Lamarconi five dollars? What is your beef with Sam Schamun.

2650
02:01:37.439 --> 02:01:38.920
<v Speaker 3>You can go watch all the old live streams where

2651
02:01:38.960 --> 02:01:40.800
<v Speaker 3>you lay out what the problems were with Sam Shimun.

2652
02:01:41.079 --> 02:01:42.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna rehearsal that right now.

2653
02:01:42.560 --> 02:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>JV Jay, you should do more with John Kiriaki. The

2654
02:01:46.439 --> 02:01:48.039
<v Speaker 1>two of you complimented each other very well.

2655
02:01:48.159 --> 02:01:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. Lamarconi says, for five dollars, can you explain

2656
02:01:51.680 --> 02:01:53.239
<v Speaker 3>Orthodox stance on faith and works.

2657
02:01:53.920 --> 02:01:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm having a hard time explaining it and defending it

2658
02:01:56.319 --> 02:02:01.159
<v Speaker 1>in OC. You over there in Orange County, dog I

2659
02:02:01.199 --> 02:02:03.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he means Orange County or the Orthodox Church,

2660
02:02:03.279 --> 02:02:07.039
<v Speaker 1>but you get something like, you know, Rock and Sand

2661
02:02:07.159 --> 02:02:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Father Josiah or look up. But guys, we've got a

2662
02:02:09.319 --> 02:02:12.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of old podcasts and videos on you know, justification

2663
02:02:12.439 --> 02:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>by faith alone and the problems with that. So I

2664
02:02:14.279 --> 02:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>would say you gotta gotta check out those old live trems.

2665
02:02:17.920 --> 02:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't try and be rude, but shout out to

2666
02:02:19.399 --> 02:02:21.439
<v Speaker 1>a c. We haven't seen Ac in in a good.

2667
02:02:21.720 --> 02:02:23.920
<v Speaker 3>In a in a hot minute. It's been a hot minute,

2668
02:02:23.960 --> 02:02:27.159
<v Speaker 3>but Ac is back in the chat. Long time supporter

2669
02:02:27.359 --> 02:02:28.000
<v Speaker 3>super chatter.

2670
02:02:28.560 --> 02:02:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Ac says, this is my hit job for Captain tazariyak

2671
02:02:32.560 --> 02:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>uh Oh. So we've done lost Ac from Orthodox to

2672
02:02:35.800 --> 02:02:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the BHI. He's now a black heeber Israeli as a

2673
02:02:38.359 --> 02:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>white man. Don't make me make sense to it, because

2674
02:02:41.000 --> 02:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it ain't gonna make sense.

2675
02:02:42.760 --> 02:02:47.119
<v Speaker 3>Mad Finland eleven dollars in regard to Ruslan and his

2676
02:02:47.319 --> 02:02:51.720
<v Speaker 3>comment about Jade Jay's Lovely which Jay fails to realize

2677
02:02:51.760 --> 02:02:52.359
<v Speaker 3>that the five.

2678
02:02:52.359 --> 02:02:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Langue Love Language are like the DITTI key to evangelicals. Oh,

2679
02:02:56.439 --> 02:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know this is a thing amongst evangelicals.

2680
02:02:58.880 --> 02:02:59.359
<v Speaker 3>I didn't really.

2681
02:02:59.359 --> 02:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know they're gay as hell, but like,

2682
02:03:02.359 --> 02:03:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what that is. They literally handed

2683
02:03:05.199 --> 02:03:07.239
<v Speaker 1>out copies of the Love Language at my old church

2684
02:03:07.279 --> 02:03:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of Christ. Jay puts on respect on Gary Chapman. Okay,

2685
02:03:10.479 --> 02:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so this is an evangelical like way to make yourself

2686
02:03:14.039 --> 02:03:14.479
<v Speaker 1>more gay.

2687
02:03:14.600 --> 02:03:15.279
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I got it.

2688
02:03:19.840 --> 02:03:22.359
<v Speaker 5>That's actually a marked I think that's actually a Marvin

2689
02:03:22.399 --> 02:03:24.319
<v Speaker 5>Gay album language.

2690
02:03:24.720 --> 02:03:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay. But it's starting to make more sense now that

2691
02:03:26.720 --> 02:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>this is like a popular evangelical thing, which I don't.

2692
02:03:31.600 --> 02:03:33.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I haven't been in the world of evangelicalism

2693
02:03:33.439 --> 02:03:39.880
<v Speaker 3>since nineteen ninety nine, so but maybe I don't know

2694
02:03:39.920 --> 02:03:42.239
<v Speaker 3>when this came out. Let's see when it come out. Okay,

2695
02:03:42.279 --> 02:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>so this is nineties. Oh look they got that Memphis.

2696
02:03:48.479 --> 02:03:55.359
<v Speaker 3>What's that horrible dystopian tech art style Corporate Memphis. Oh

2697
02:03:55.439 --> 02:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>my gosh.

2698
02:03:55.920 --> 02:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>If I see corporate Memphis and faceless black and white

2699
02:03:58.840 --> 02:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>people together, yeah, that's perfect.

2700
02:04:01.279 --> 02:04:07.319
<v Speaker 3>For the rusalom Ruslan. Ruslan's whole rhythm Church should be

2701
02:04:07.439 --> 02:04:11.399
<v Speaker 3>decked out in icons with Rouslan Saints in corporate Memphis.

2702
02:04:11.439 --> 02:04:16.920
<v Speaker 3>That would be perfect for him. Triple seven, you know branch.

2703
02:04:16.680 --> 02:04:17.720
<v Speaker 4>In New York, you can be.

2704
02:04:19.479 --> 02:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh, excuse me, excuse me, you mean Tristan Tristan. I

2705
02:04:24.920 --> 02:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>think you mean a franchise of the church. Franchise exactly

2706
02:04:33.920 --> 02:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>triple five dollars. When will we get a Gnostic pope

2707
02:04:37.079 --> 02:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>with Jay Dyer Who's Gnostic pope? He is an ex

2708
02:04:39.680 --> 02:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Muslim who became Orthodox Catechyuman. Okay, well, I'm not familiar

2709
02:04:42.560 --> 02:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>with him, but that's he sounds like he's making the

2710
02:04:44.760 --> 02:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>right moves. Uh, all right, hold on, we got to

2711
02:04:52.520 --> 02:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>check the super chats over here on YouTube because those

2712
02:04:55.880 --> 02:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>are separate and always always missed some of.

2713
02:04:57.720 --> 02:05:03.159
<v Speaker 3>These, so uh, TJ's takes five dollars. I can't see

2714
02:05:03.199 --> 02:05:04.159
<v Speaker 3>if you made a comment.

2715
02:05:05.239 --> 02:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Ac says for five dollars, this really shows the trajectory

2716
02:05:08.279 --> 02:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>of the Middle Ages and Protestantism to Masonry to relativism

2717
02:05:12.119 --> 02:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and liberalism. That's actually a good point, right, You kind

2718
02:05:14.000 --> 02:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of have these phases historically in the West, ideologically speaking

2719
02:05:17.960 --> 02:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of the movement from you know, medieval Papism to Enlightenment

2720
02:05:23.079 --> 02:05:26.079
<v Speaker 1>and Protestantism and Enlightenment and then you get Masonry and

2721
02:05:26.159 --> 02:05:29.079
<v Speaker 1>then you get atheism. Right, And that's exactly what sat

2722
02:05:29.119 --> 02:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Gregy Palmos said, the trajectory would be of the West.

2723
02:05:31.720 --> 02:05:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Great comment there, ac two.

2724
02:05:37.720 --> 02:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>The we sing gave out a bunch of memberships. Appreciate that, man,

2725
02:05:41.079 --> 02:05:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the generosity tonight. I think I got all

2726
02:05:47.159 --> 02:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the super chests there. Making sure guys remember head on

2727
02:05:50.800 --> 02:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>a chalk dot com remember to subscribe to our bro

2728
02:05:53.359 --> 02:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>a Tristanna. Tristan is linked in the show description the

2729
02:05:56.199 --> 02:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Tristan Haggard YouTube channel. Be sure to subscribe to me

2730
02:05:59.039 --> 02:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on x and everywhere.

2731
02:06:00.199 --> 02:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Digital says for ten dollars, it would have been funny as.

2732
02:06:02.479 --> 02:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Hell if you could have dropped the Muslim painting from

2733
02:06:04.800 --> 02:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>the Masonic Museum. When the ball guy said that they

2734
02:06:08.079 --> 02:06:10.399
<v Speaker 1>would say hell no to Muslim members, that's not true

2735
02:06:10.399 --> 02:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>though they have Muslim members. You can, I mean, Chase

2736
02:06:13.560 --> 02:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>admitted that what they were saying was they don't believe

2737
02:06:17.079 --> 02:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they personally are worshiping the same God as Islam, but

2738
02:06:19.840 --> 02:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they can be in the society with Muslims because they're

2739
02:06:22.000 --> 02:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>affirming the same quote generic God personally.

2740
02:06:25.000 --> 02:06:26.319
<v Speaker 3>So you know, it's how silly that is. Oh.

2741
02:06:26.399 --> 02:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Wilson says, for twenty dollars, Jay one over two Freemasons.

2742
02:06:31.880 --> 02:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>The Freemason homo is an easy dub. Rachel says, give

2743
02:06:37.359 --> 02:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Jay your money.

2744
02:06:38.039 --> 02:06:42.439
<v Speaker 3>All you pay piggys ooh pay Piggy pro Zilch coming

2745
02:06:42.479 --> 02:06:45.720
<v Speaker 3>in clutch for twenty memberships. He gifted twenty memberships. Thank

2746
02:06:45.720 --> 02:06:48.880
<v Speaker 3>you so much. Zell's appreciate that. Appreciate that.

2747
02:06:49.039 --> 02:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Alan Yee says, stop that Freemason cap. Pay Masons is

2748
02:06:53.840 --> 02:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>where it's at you exactly, and now I have no

2749
02:06:55.920 --> 02:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>more to this Freemason. I'm talking about getting paid Mason

2750
02:06:58.680 --> 02:06:59.199
<v Speaker 1>over here.

2751
02:07:06.279 --> 02:07:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Again.

2752
02:07:06.720 --> 02:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>We got people talking about Tristan mogging me in terms

2753
02:07:09.560 --> 02:07:10.479
<v Speaker 1>of diva status.

2754
02:07:11.039 --> 02:07:13.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm just going to have a rage quick. I'm going

2755
02:07:13.359 --> 02:07:16.239
<v Speaker 3>to have a rage quick read these ones. All right.

2756
02:07:16.279 --> 02:07:22.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry we got Walter, I've been waiting minute. Yeah,

2757
02:07:22.399 --> 02:07:24.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry. I forgot to go to the people in

2758
02:07:24.239 --> 02:07:25.680
<v Speaker 3>the in the queue here, what's up dog?

2759
02:07:26.960 --> 02:07:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Hey, good to hear you guys again. I just I'm

2760
02:07:29.880 --> 02:07:32.000
<v Speaker 4>just here. It's like quite early.

2761
02:07:32.159 --> 02:07:36.319
<v Speaker 5>I'm from Germany, by the way, I guess I want

2762
02:07:36.359 --> 02:07:39.159
<v Speaker 5>to tell you I want to start Twitter spaces myself,

2763
02:07:39.600 --> 02:07:41.399
<v Speaker 5>trying to do the social media thing.

2764
02:07:42.319 --> 02:07:44.159
<v Speaker 4>Got the blue check mark and all that.

2765
02:07:44.840 --> 02:07:47.880
<v Speaker 16>I'm wondering, like, I need some guests, like and I'd

2766
02:07:47.920 --> 02:07:53.039
<v Speaker 16>be very glad if like you are Tristan or both ideal,

2767
02:07:53.399 --> 02:07:56.920
<v Speaker 16>like we could set up some cool Twitter spaces.

2768
02:07:56.920 --> 02:07:58.319
<v Speaker 4>I would like to interview you guys.

2769
02:07:59.319 --> 02:07:59.439
<v Speaker 9>Uh.

2770
02:07:59.560 --> 02:08:01.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, I hit him up, hit me up in

2771
02:08:01.399 --> 02:08:03.119
<v Speaker 3>the the messages.

2772
02:08:03.359 --> 02:08:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Uh, and I'll.

2773
02:08:06.039 --> 02:08:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I appreciate that. Okay, I appreciate it. Man. Yeah,

2774
02:08:09.159 --> 02:08:10.520
<v Speaker 3>we'll take a look at that and we'll forgot out

2775
02:08:10.520 --> 02:08:11.479
<v Speaker 3>a time when we can do something.

2776
02:08:11.520 --> 02:08:15.199
<v Speaker 4>Colper, what's Up's my handler? So he speaks from me?

2777
02:08:15.319 --> 02:08:18.640
<v Speaker 3>He has and I have to ask, right.

2778
02:08:18.760 --> 02:08:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I asked Karaoku what to say, and Karaoku asked Putin

2779
02:08:21.520 --> 02:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>what to say. So it has to come down the

2780
02:08:23.000 --> 02:08:25.439
<v Speaker 1>chain of hierarchy properly.

2781
02:08:25.520 --> 02:08:27.720
<v Speaker 3>We have to do it in the right order. TJ says.

2782
02:08:27.760 --> 02:08:31.319
<v Speaker 3>For five dollars, pay grind g. I think he's talking

2783
02:08:31.319 --> 02:08:32.159
<v Speaker 3>about Brian Shapiro.

2784
02:08:33.640 --> 02:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think when I mentioned when I started laughing,

2785
02:08:35.720 --> 02:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>when I missed when I was talking to John Kiyaku

2786
02:08:38.199 --> 02:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and I was thinking about peaky blinders and I said

2787
02:08:41.560 --> 02:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>peaky grinders, and I was thinking of Brian Shapiro. And

2788
02:08:44.640 --> 02:08:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think John Kiyaku. He probably just thought I

2789
02:08:47.399 --> 02:08:50.359
<v Speaker 1>was talking about the sandwich, the grinder, Culpeper. What's up,

2790
02:08:53.840 --> 02:08:54.279
<v Speaker 1>col Pepper?

2791
02:08:54.319 --> 02:08:54.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm you.

2792
02:08:58.520 --> 02:08:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Hey, can you hear me?

2793
02:08:59.319 --> 02:09:00.279
<v Speaker 4>Can you hear me? Uh? Huh?

2794
02:09:00.319 --> 02:09:00.600
<v Speaker 3>What's up?

2795
02:09:00.640 --> 02:09:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Man? You said Culpepper.

2796
02:09:02.600 --> 02:09:08.079
<v Speaker 17>You understand the history of that, right, No, Coulpepper was

2797
02:09:08.239 --> 02:09:12.680
<v Speaker 17>the name that Washington gave Colper before he named them Culper.

2798
02:09:13.000 --> 02:09:15.239
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, I can't see I got Boomera. I'm sorry.

2799
02:09:15.880 --> 02:09:19.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, No, I'm a boomer too, dude, don't worry. Uh, Tristan,

2800
02:09:20.560 --> 02:09:21.319
<v Speaker 9>I'm a fan of you.

2801
02:09:22.039 --> 02:09:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I just followed you, all right.

2802
02:09:23.119 --> 02:09:25.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm immediately going to meet this guy because we're getting

2803
02:09:25.119 --> 02:09:25.479
<v Speaker 3>too many.

2804
02:09:25.840 --> 02:09:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

2805
02:09:30.760 --> 02:09:32.520
<v Speaker 3>This is not I did not expect it to go

2806
02:09:32.640 --> 02:09:37.880
<v Speaker 3>this way. There's too many, Tristan. My biggest thing.

2807
02:09:39.960 --> 02:09:42.039
<v Speaker 9>I called before you, Remember I told you my mom

2808
02:09:42.199 --> 02:09:45.039
<v Speaker 9>like married a bunch of people and had a bunch

2809
02:09:45.119 --> 02:09:48.399
<v Speaker 9>of husbands or whatever I called like months.

2810
02:09:48.119 --> 02:09:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Ago, me or him or who are you talking about?

2811
02:09:51.119 --> 02:09:51.600
<v Speaker 4>I called you.

2812
02:09:51.800 --> 02:09:54.239
<v Speaker 3>I called you and your mama had a bunch of husbands.

2813
02:09:54.840 --> 02:09:57.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he said.

2814
02:09:59.720 --> 02:10:02.159
<v Speaker 3>This, This ain't Jerry Springer signing the Saint Oprah.

2815
02:10:03.239 --> 02:10:05.399
<v Speaker 9>But what I was trying to say one of the

2816
02:10:05.520 --> 02:10:13.000
<v Speaker 9>husbands had a Masonic Bible. Oo. Yeah, dog, So I

2817
02:10:13.119 --> 02:10:16.720
<v Speaker 9>love the Bible. My grandmama she gave me a King James.

2818
02:10:16.960 --> 02:10:19.119
<v Speaker 4>I read it. They went through you remember the King James.

2819
02:10:19.159 --> 02:10:22.399
<v Speaker 4>I had like the maps in the back. Yes, yeah,

2820
02:10:22.640 --> 02:10:23.680
<v Speaker 4>you would go through the maps.

2821
02:10:23.760 --> 02:10:26.880
<v Speaker 9>You're like, ooh, just as the old Israel and here

2822
02:10:26.920 --> 02:10:27.119
<v Speaker 9>we go.

2823
02:10:27.279 --> 02:10:30.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, if you go back in the back of a.

2824
02:10:30.680 --> 02:10:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Masonic Bible, it's like a bunch of Egyptian hieroglyphics.

2825
02:10:35.159 --> 02:10:39.079
<v Speaker 4>Oh I didn't know that, dude. I opened up the

2826
02:10:39.159 --> 02:10:40.119
<v Speaker 4>Masonic Bible.

2827
02:10:40.239 --> 02:10:44.680
<v Speaker 17>Wow, it was like the Iohaus a bunch of Egyptian

2828
02:10:44.840 --> 02:10:45.720
<v Speaker 17>highero glyphics.

2829
02:10:45.800 --> 02:10:48.000
<v Speaker 4>And I was just like, Mama, what the fuck is this?

2830
02:10:48.479 --> 02:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I'm not Yeah, I'm not surprised because I

2831
02:10:51.800 --> 02:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>have seen appreciate that culprit.

2832
02:10:53.399 --> 02:10:56.279
<v Speaker 3>I have seen Masonic Bibles, you know, the big, big

2833
02:10:56.359 --> 02:10:57.159
<v Speaker 3>ones that they have the lot.

2834
02:10:57.279 --> 02:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>I've just never spent a lot of time flipping through them,

2835
02:10:59.600 --> 02:11:03.239
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not surprised that there's you know, like egypt

2836
02:11:03.680 --> 02:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, esotery, Egyptian gibberation in the back.

2837
02:11:06.039 --> 02:11:13.119
<v Speaker 3>But that's that's fascinating, Connive. What's in the back? Exactly right?

2838
02:11:13.159 --> 02:11:15.319
<v Speaker 4>I would to make an edit, like a cringe core

2839
02:11:15.479 --> 02:11:17.720
<v Speaker 4>edit song of some of the same thing. That's some

2840
02:11:17.760 --> 02:11:18.760
<v Speaker 4>of the things he just said.

2841
02:11:19.760 --> 02:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Talks by the way, Uh, your mom with anybody right now?

2842
02:11:26.159 --> 02:11:29.199
<v Speaker 5>Jay, you know that nickname of your mom is the

2843
02:11:29.319 --> 02:11:30.399
<v Speaker 5>I Ah Risk.

2844
02:11:30.479 --> 02:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh shit, connive conveyive, what's up man, I'm here now.

2845
02:11:35.840 --> 02:11:38.680
<v Speaker 3>My Michael isn't working earlier. But I just had a

2846
02:11:39.000 --> 02:11:40.520
<v Speaker 3>question about and just for.

2847
02:11:40.640 --> 02:11:43.359
<v Speaker 18>Context, I told you I was a Catholic before, and

2848
02:11:43.840 --> 02:11:46.760
<v Speaker 18>I'm currently discerning between the Catholic Church.

2849
02:11:46.600 --> 02:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>And Eastern Orthodoxy.

2850
02:11:48.600 --> 02:11:52.520
<v Speaker 18>And I've been writing an evangelical letter to someone that

2851
02:11:52.600 --> 02:11:55.760
<v Speaker 18>I know that's a non practicing Catholic and just believing

2852
02:11:55.800 --> 02:11:58.800
<v Speaker 18>in atheism. And I thought it was going to be easy,

2853
02:11:59.000 --> 02:12:01.640
<v Speaker 18>like an easy letter, right. Oh, I'm gonna list the

2854
02:12:01.720 --> 02:12:03.079
<v Speaker 18>five arguments from Aquinas.

2855
02:12:03.960 --> 02:12:07.479
<v Speaker 4>And while I was writing the letter, I found.

2856
02:12:07.239 --> 02:12:10.880
<v Speaker 18>A video by you rejecting the first argument of motion.

2857
02:12:11.640 --> 02:12:13.479
<v Speaker 4>And I found an argument against.

2858
02:12:13.279 --> 02:12:16.279
<v Speaker 18>Natural theology by Father and I don't know how to

2859
02:12:16.279 --> 02:12:19.680
<v Speaker 18>pronounce his name, Deacon Annius.

2860
02:12:20.520 --> 02:12:22.239
<v Speaker 4>Nice, Yeah, I blink, but.

2861
02:12:23.159 --> 02:12:25.399
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, And that was based on like epistemology. But I

2862
02:12:25.479 --> 02:12:28.640
<v Speaker 18>don't have a very good understanding of epistemology yet because

2863
02:12:28.680 --> 02:12:29.359
<v Speaker 18>I haven't studied it.

2864
02:12:30.079 --> 02:12:33.039
<v Speaker 4>So my question to you is, if.

2865
02:12:33.000 --> 02:12:35.560
<v Speaker 18>You were in my situation, how would you create the

2866
02:12:35.640 --> 02:12:39.239
<v Speaker 18>most coherent argument for the existence of God if you

2867
02:12:39.359 --> 02:12:41.840
<v Speaker 18>reject natural theology and correct me if I'm wrong on

2868
02:12:41.920 --> 02:12:46.239
<v Speaker 18>your position, and what arguments would be the most logically

2869
02:12:46.359 --> 02:12:49.239
<v Speaker 18>valid while also being plausible to a heathen.

2870
02:12:51.159 --> 02:12:54.279
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be really difficult to convey in a

2871
02:12:54.399 --> 02:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>letter to an atheist. I mean, I'm not telling you

2872
02:12:56.319 --> 02:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not to do it, but you know, we got a

2873
02:12:58.560 --> 02:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of videos kind of explained TAG, so I'll go

2874
02:13:00.880 --> 02:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I would say, go check out any of the TAG

2875
02:13:02.560 --> 02:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>explanation videos or Father Deconductor and Ice on his channel.

2876
02:13:06.000 --> 02:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>He has a whole playlist on TAG and his channel

2877
02:13:08.840 --> 02:13:11.079
<v Speaker 1>is Patristic Faith Chase.

2878
02:13:11.439 --> 02:13:12.960
<v Speaker 3>H uh oh, this is.

2879
02:13:13.000 --> 02:13:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Getting a little too haggardly. I mean, we've got too

2880
02:13:15.239 --> 02:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>much haggard energy in here. It's just kind of sap

2881
02:13:17.800 --> 02:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in the room. So yeah, you can.

2882
02:13:21.000 --> 02:13:25.000
<v Speaker 4>You can boot Tristan. Let's see he's done. Okay, yeah,

2883
02:13:25.039 --> 02:13:29.399
<v Speaker 4>you can remove him. Tristan, are you there? Hello?

2884
02:13:29.760 --> 02:13:30.880
<v Speaker 3>I think he's not going to talk to you.

2885
02:13:33.239 --> 02:13:35.560
<v Speaker 4>He's a tuning out the sound of his voice. Who's this?

2886
02:13:37.600 --> 02:13:38.760
<v Speaker 4>This is your former brother.

2887
02:13:38.960 --> 02:13:41.079
<v Speaker 5>The family asked me to send you a message because

2888
02:13:41.079 --> 02:13:43.159
<v Speaker 5>of your good performance tonight, we'd like to.

2889
02:13:43.520 --> 02:13:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Go back to stop.

2890
02:13:45.439 --> 02:13:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Stop mute him, mute him, please mute him. Sorry, this

2891
02:13:52.119 --> 02:13:55.319
<v Speaker 5>is this is not your cross exam time. The family

2892
02:13:55.720 --> 02:13:58.479
<v Speaker 5>would like to offer you a place back at the table. Okay,

2893
02:13:58.560 --> 02:14:00.239
<v Speaker 5>we'll call you by your name. You know you got

2894
02:14:00.319 --> 02:14:02.640
<v Speaker 5>mad and calling you the other son. But we'd like

2895
02:14:02.720 --> 02:14:04.520
<v Speaker 5>to offer you a chance back at the table.

2896
02:14:04.560 --> 02:14:06.439
<v Speaker 3>See we got reconciliation happening right here.

2897
02:14:08.039 --> 02:14:13.039
<v Speaker 4>Do you accept the terms? Somebody just tell me when

2898
02:14:13.039 --> 02:14:14.239
<v Speaker 4>he's done talking, I'll come back.

2899
02:14:14.399 --> 02:14:17.159
<v Speaker 5>Okay, all right, Well, you.

2900
02:14:17.199 --> 02:14:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Know we're proud of you. Parents said that they'd like

2901
02:14:20.840 --> 02:14:22.640
<v Speaker 4>to soon say they love you. So that's all I want.

2902
02:14:22.720 --> 02:14:24.199
<v Speaker 3>This has to do with people transition.

2903
02:14:24.399 --> 02:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>This has to do with detransitioning and where people are

2904
02:14:26.680 --> 02:14:28.479
<v Speaker 1>at and their journey and you know, that's.

2905
02:14:28.560 --> 02:14:31.079
<v Speaker 4>Kind of what's not funny? I know that's not funny.

2906
02:14:31.079 --> 02:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not making a joke.

2907
02:14:32.600 --> 02:14:37.920
<v Speaker 5>That's not a funny joke. Bro, all right, no apology.

2908
02:14:37.960 --> 02:14:38.880
<v Speaker 5>All right, well I'm headed out.

2909
02:14:38.960 --> 02:14:39.199
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

2910
02:14:39.319 --> 02:14:39.760
<v Speaker 4>That's all right.

2911
02:14:39.800 --> 02:14:41.319
<v Speaker 3>Well that's all you can do. That's all you can do.

2912
02:14:41.479 --> 02:14:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Chase, good luck with him, Kristen says, get on with

2913
02:14:45.279 --> 02:14:46.119
<v Speaker 1>gnostic Pope.

2914
02:14:46.880 --> 02:14:49.039
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, we'll see nastic Pope, he says.

2915
02:14:49.319 --> 02:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Triple Triple says he has three hundred and eighty six

2916
02:14:52.039 --> 02:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok. I'll have to just see who he is.

2917
02:14:54.920 --> 02:14:58.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not familiar with him, but I appreciate the recommendation.

2918
02:14:59.119 --> 02:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, had the Heath what's up Heath? Who that's

2919
02:15:05.800 --> 02:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a Heather Heath?

2920
02:15:10.119 --> 02:15:12.359
<v Speaker 3>Guys, I'm gonna split the supertisal twist and last chance

2921
02:15:12.439 --> 02:15:16.840
<v Speaker 3>to also support Tristana Heath. What's up man? Last chance?

2922
02:15:17.520 --> 02:15:19.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, you're done? Goodbye?

2923
02:15:21.039 --> 02:15:24.000
<v Speaker 5>Uh for the record, Jade, just want to clear things

2924
02:15:24.000 --> 02:15:26.079
<v Speaker 5>that with some of the slander that you you levied

2925
02:15:26.119 --> 02:15:28.319
<v Speaker 5>at me earlier, saying that it was my tech problem.

2926
02:15:28.720 --> 02:15:32.439
<v Speaker 5>I've done two separate tests and my connections one percent,

2927
02:15:32.800 --> 02:15:33.960
<v Speaker 5>so I think there's something.

2928
02:15:33.760 --> 02:15:34.239
<v Speaker 4>With uh.

2929
02:15:36.039 --> 02:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It could no collab cam on O B S. But

2930
02:15:38.960 --> 02:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't like I had no problems with

2931
02:15:40.800 --> 02:15:43.439
<v Speaker 1>UH karaoke, So I don't know. Dictis what's up?

2932
02:15:45.119 --> 02:15:45.439
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

2933
02:15:45.560 --> 02:15:46.079
<v Speaker 9>How you doing?

2934
02:15:46.720 --> 02:15:47.039
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

2935
02:15:47.880 --> 02:15:50.079
<v Speaker 13>I sent the super shad about the UH the C

2936
02:15:50.239 --> 02:15:53.520
<v Speaker 13>I a storiography. I have an interesting passage here if

2937
02:15:53.520 --> 02:15:54.520
<v Speaker 13>you want to hear it.

2938
02:15:54.760 --> 02:16:01.119
<v Speaker 4>Sure you're familiar with Intrepid the Montgomery.

2939
02:16:00.720 --> 02:16:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, William Stevens and William Stevenson Inupid.

2940
02:16:04.680 --> 02:16:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2941
02:16:05.359 --> 02:16:08.319
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, there's a quote here. So this is from Donovan

2942
02:16:08.359 --> 02:16:10.840
<v Speaker 13>and the CIA by Thomas Troy, which is a semi

2943
02:16:10.960 --> 02:16:16.640
<v Speaker 13>official uh CIA history. It was written for incoming CIA

2944
02:16:16.720 --> 02:16:19.319
<v Speaker 13>agents to know the history of the Foundation and UH.

2945
02:16:19.680 --> 02:16:22.239
<v Speaker 13>He says here in the preface to the second printing.

2946
02:16:23.359 --> 02:16:25.399
<v Speaker 3>About the book a man called in Trumpid.

2947
02:16:25.439 --> 02:16:28.479
<v Speaker 13>He says, the story an impressive and fascinating one has

2948
02:16:28.520 --> 02:16:31.159
<v Speaker 13>never been told. However, on the basis of publicly available

2949
02:16:31.199 --> 02:16:35.319
<v Speaker 13>primary sources, and consequently many claims or details remain undocumented.

2950
02:16:35.719 --> 02:16:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Two of these name mentioned here.

2951
02:16:38.079 --> 02:16:40.879
<v Speaker 13>The first is the market quotation attributed to the author

2952
02:16:40.959 --> 02:16:44.760
<v Speaker 13>Stevens and Donovan, detailing the time plays the subject of

2953
02:16:44.760 --> 02:16:45.319
<v Speaker 13>the conversation.

2954
02:16:45.440 --> 02:16:46.799
<v Speaker 4>The first meeting of Donovan TRUMPID.

2955
02:16:47.440 --> 02:16:51.360
<v Speaker 13>So basically he's saying that there's evidence that Donovan and

2956
02:16:52.040 --> 02:16:56.120
<v Speaker 13>uh and Trumpitt knew each other by the comic connection

2957
02:16:56.200 --> 02:16:58.840
<v Speaker 13>to Vincent astor Uh in FDR.

2958
02:17:00.159 --> 02:17:01.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah that, I mean, that comes up in old boys

2959
02:17:02.079 --> 02:17:02.879
<v Speaker 3>like they talk about.

2960
02:17:02.879 --> 02:17:06.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Donovan was a Rockefeller representative, and Donovan had

2961
02:17:06.120 --> 02:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>an office at Rockefeller Plaza from from the Rockfellers.

2962
02:17:13.559 --> 02:17:15.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. William, I'm sorry.

2963
02:17:15.159 --> 02:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>William Stevenson had an office at Rockfeller Plaza from the Rockefellers,

2964
02:17:19.479 --> 02:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and Donovan was a work for the Rockfeller Foundation before

2965
02:17:24.200 --> 02:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>he would do all that stuff.

2966
02:17:27.440 --> 02:17:30.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I picked up hersh on your recommendation. That's been

2967
02:17:30.280 --> 02:17:31.719
<v Speaker 4>great to have for the project.

2968
02:17:32.120 --> 02:17:35.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. We arguing for extensive I'm limited to like seven pages, right,
