Speaker 1: Speak and maybe I'll read some more about deportationation in
Speaker 1: a moment. But before we go there, let's take a
Speaker 1: listen to the overtime from this past Friday when a
Speaker 1: question from the audience comes to the randomly assembled panel
Speaker 1: about the JFK assassination.
Speaker 2: Okay, so do we expect.
Speaker 3: To learn anything revelatory from the JFK files just released?
Speaker 2: Well, what do you mean expect? We saw them and
Speaker 2: we didn't. Is it time to move on.
Speaker 3: From this conspiracy theory?
Speaker 4: Well, I mean, do you think it's conspiracy theory? I mean,
Speaker 4: I mean, plainly, there was not a single gunman, right,
Speaker 4: we all agree on that.
Speaker 5: No, I mean that I have you believed such weak
Speaker 5: opinions on this.
Speaker 4: But the magic bullet there could not have been a
Speaker 4: bullet that went through a guy, went around him, came
Speaker 4: back when through the other guy got lunch at the.
Speaker 3: Diner, came back shot him in the back of the head.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's just come on, everybody heard a shot
Speaker 3: from the grassy knoll.
Speaker 2: I mean that we care. I mean, honestly, I'm telling
Speaker 2: with it.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's I don't I don't think we're okay.
Speaker 1: So the gay guy journalist authors that he you know,
Speaker 1: rotates through and always has a spot for on real
Speaker 1: time with Bill Maher. This is the after show. Uh
Speaker 1: is telling you basically, I don't care, who cares anymore?
Speaker 1: Does anybody care? And why would they? Normal position of
Speaker 1: the standard you know, corporate media. Now Bill Maher's position
Speaker 1: has changed. He would refuse to listen to anything other
Speaker 1: than the official explanation. But I want you to notice
Speaker 1: that he is now pivoted to essentially believing just like Trump,
Speaker 1: by the way, and this makes them equals just like Trump.
Speaker 2: That well, look.
Speaker 1: Oswald is probably not entirely guilty, but.
Speaker 2: He's still in on it. We didn't learn anything from
Speaker 2: the new files.
Speaker 1: Nothing to see here at all, and continue on go
Speaker 1: about your day. But there is a controversy here. And meanwhile,
Speaker 1: please randomly rotating authors and politicians and maybe comedians or
Speaker 1: other types of actors weigh in on this, and make
Speaker 1: sure to check the boxes regarding the typical corporate media spin.
Speaker 1: Let's see if there's anything more on it.
Speaker 2: Final news dump.
Speaker 3: And if they don't know, now they you know they don't.
Speaker 2: Know, Okay, the final news dump.
Speaker 1: All these things, it's really funny to me and still
Speaker 1: we're getting the typical.
Speaker 2: Just notice the pivot. That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 1: A few years back, and I do mean many years
Speaker 1: back now, I guess maybe fifteen years ago or more.
Speaker 1: Bill Maher was handed a book by Oliver Stone who
Speaker 1: was a guest on his show. And that book was
Speaker 1: JFK and the Unspeakable as it had been published by
Speaker 1: that you know, small Catholic publisher, you know, and was
Speaker 1: just getting rave reviews in the assassination community but was
Speaker 1: not being seen by a mainstream audience. And Oliver Stone
Speaker 1: hands it to Bill Maher. Bill Maher scoffs at it.
Speaker 1: The next thing, you know, is and it's a very
Speaker 1: good book and it's valuable. But JFK and the Unspeakable
Speaker 1: is now picked up by Simon and Schuster. It's out there, boom.
Speaker 1: They did everything except release the audio version of it,
Speaker 1: which when I contacted doctor Douglas myself and complained to
Speaker 1: him about not being able to read his book very
Speaker 1: easily without putting in some extra effort, he personally commissioned
Speaker 1: the audiobook which exists today that's on audible dot com
Speaker 1: and whatnot, and sent me a copy of it on
Speaker 1: CD to thank me for inspiring its creation, because otherwise
Speaker 1: Simon and Schuster wasn't going for it his old publishing company,
Speaker 1: which is the publishing that he reproduced. See technically speaking,
Speaker 1: it's a slightly different book that Simon and Schuster published
Speaker 1: versus the original Catholic printing agency that put it out,
Speaker 1: So he wanted to thank me for inspiring its creation.
Speaker 1: But really, all I was trying to get doctor Douglas
Speaker 1: to do when I talk to him is make sure
Speaker 1: that he put it in for the free books for
Speaker 1: the blind, which the Library of Congress produces for blind people,
Speaker 1: or at least they used to. Who knows if Doge
Speaker 1: got a hold of that, and maybe there is no
Speaker 1: more talking books for the blind as they used to
Speaker 1: call it, or you know, audiobooks for people.
Speaker 2: Who can't see is what it should be called.
Speaker 1: And maybe the Library of Congress doesn't have a budget
Speaker 1: for that anymore either because that might be waste, fraud
Speaker 1: or other abuses.
Speaker 2: Who knows.
Speaker 1: Stay tuned, But back to Bill Maher and working cleanup
Speaker 1: and also doing his job as a regular mainstream promoter.
Speaker 2: Provocateur, etc.
Speaker 1: Hired by one of those five major companies that controls
Speaker 1: all media in broadcast, cable, digitized, whatever, and what else
Speaker 1: does he have to add to the JFK question And
Speaker 1: as he mocks scops and moves away from it, pivoting
Speaker 1: his personal position as if it was always that way
Speaker 1: to begin with. But pay no attention to that because
Speaker 1: there's nothing to see there either, or maybe there is.
Speaker 2: We'll keep going. But before that the rest of the clip.
Speaker 3: But you know, the idea that the CIA is going
Speaker 3: to now suddenly go, you're right, we had something to
Speaker 3: do with it. If they did, I'm not saying they did,
Speaker 3: but a lot of people wanted.
Speaker 5: Them to idead that in the file somewhere in all
Speaker 5: these files that they were going to release, and it
Speaker 5: was going to be a one page it says, oh,
Speaker 5: we actually do the whole time, right.
Speaker 2: It was always a little fanciful.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that's why it's a little cruel to actual give
Speaker 5: them everything, right, because they could always hope that some
Speaker 5: mystery was there.
Speaker 3: Well, what was cruel is to promote it like it's
Speaker 3: going to be great and then it's al Capone's faults.
Speaker 1: Files came out, ever adopted, we see again with outdated
Speaker 1: references in case people forgot or you're under the age
Speaker 1: of fifty, Haraldo Rivera, another media darling who's supposed to
Speaker 1: be some you know, rebel without a pause in broadcasting,
Speaker 1: went and did this whole big production one night live.
Speaker 1: We're gonna reveal for the first time ever, stuff that's
Speaker 1: been hidden in a vault by al Capone, ever since
Speaker 1: he was still alive. And this is, you know, half
Speaker 1: a century later. What in the hell could he have
Speaker 1: hidden in this secret vault that he kept from everybody.
Speaker 1: Maybe there's money in there, who knows, there could be bodies.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, we're gonna open it on live TV.
Speaker 1: And what they ended up with was a couple of
Speaker 1: old bottles and some dirt and nothing else. And Haroldo
Speaker 1: was for probably about a decade shamed and labeled as
Speaker 1: the guy who did al Capone's vault, and rightfully so.
Speaker 1: And Bill Maher's trying to equate, you know, all these pages.
Speaker 1: And I don't know, if you're a pro Trump guy,
Speaker 1: maybe you get pissed, but that's part of the game here.
Speaker 1: He is now officially back in to the circle of
Speaker 1: approved media for you to get misled by. I want
Speaker 1: you to know that as I go forward in these
Speaker 1: discussions and expositions.
Speaker 2: This evening to react to two files are the one
Speaker 2: time I've always been more interested in.
Speaker 1: Now this guy's saying, with all the applause, you know,
Speaker 1: way over piped on top of him, thank you, mister
Speaker 1: sound man at HBO Dick. But he's trying to say,
Speaker 1: you know, it's the redacted parts of the files that
Speaker 1: makes it most interesting for me. But all these guys
Speaker 1: have these preloaded answers that they've decided to note in
Speaker 1: their brains to make it seem as though they're more
Speaker 1: informed about the subject and more intelligent regarding the subject
Speaker 1: of the declassifications, the files, the political you know effects
Speaker 1: let's call them, and all that and all it is
Speaker 1: is a bunch of stilted and disingenuous.
Speaker 2: Bullshit from the Epstein FOT.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the guys who are speaking about it,
Speaker 1: not necessarily the question of it or.
Speaker 2: How important it is or none of that. But they're
Speaker 2: all there serving a role.
Speaker 1: You can figure out who's supposed to be the heel,
Speaker 1: who's supposed to be the face, Who is the supporting
Speaker 1: actor or actress or what? Is there some kind of
Speaker 1: non binary way to describe actors anymore?
Speaker 2: I think they're all actors now. Actress is a word
Speaker 2: they got rid of. Maybe I don't know.
Speaker 1: It's difficult to keep up with PS linguistics, right, the
Speaker 1: you know, if you will, the accepted terminology which is
Speaker 1: in the in the zeitgeist, right and it's not in
Speaker 1: the zechi psychisis spirit of the time? What is it?
Speaker 1: The the genuinely or generally excuse me, accepted uh terminology?
Speaker 2: Right? That that is out there regarding all of this.
Speaker 2: Hard to keep up.
Speaker 1: But anyway, writers, authors, and maybe we'll hear from Dana Carvey.
Speaker 1: I think he was a guest on this show during
Speaker 1: the primary interview, so he might time in during this
Speaker 1: JFK discussion in the overtime segment from the what day
Speaker 1: was it?
Speaker 2: Twenty first? Twenty first of this week? So of this month?
Speaker 1: Excuse me? So on this past Friday? This is from
Speaker 1: so about like what was it? Ten thirty pm Eastern.
Speaker 1: This is running live on YouTube as the after show
Speaker 1: for Bill Maher's Real Time ein FN.
Speaker 2: What do you think I mean?
Speaker 5: I didn't go through and read them. I was seeing
Speaker 5: other people who cared more about this than I had
Speaker 5: talk about this on social media.
Speaker 2: But as long as we're talking about conspiracies. I've always thought,
Speaker 2: now how.
Speaker 1: They pivot to the Epstein file, And this guy just admitted, Look,
Speaker 1: I didn't care about it enough to read any of it,
Speaker 1: and I don't really know much about it.
Speaker 2: I just watched other people react to it. And now see,
Speaker 2: here we go.
Speaker 1: It's like again the South Park reference is funny because
Speaker 1: I don't know if you guys remember, but there was
Speaker 1: like this whole thing they did at one point where
Speaker 1: it was like the one kid gets annoyed with the
Speaker 1: younger kid who is out there and he's more interested
Speaker 1: in watching a commentator right comment about somebody else who's
Speaker 1: doing a comment video on.
Speaker 2: Playing a video game.
Speaker 1: And originally it starts with a guy with a video
Speaker 1: game playing and just talking while he's playing. People watch that,
Speaker 1: and now people are watching other people who watch that
Speaker 1: watch it again, and it becomes this insane video echo
Speaker 1: chamber of useless commentary media. And the ironic thing is
Speaker 1: that as you listen to me discuss this, you are
Speaker 1: involved in one of those chains.
Speaker 2: But is it useless?
Speaker 1: And by the way, did I produce something new by
Speaker 1: taking a look at the recycled regurgitated vomitis noise and
Speaker 1: visual and I'm not even torturing you with the visuals.
Speaker 1: I'm just doing an audio this. But am I being
Speaker 1: at least additional? Am I adding to the common conversation
Speaker 1: or the intellectual debate, study, et cetera as we go?
Speaker 1: I guess I got to leave that to your judgment lately, O'Kelly,
Speaker 1: not quite you know, is definitely not quite avoiding the
Speaker 1: on the outslist, right, I'm not getting canceled, but I
Speaker 1: am getting ignored by a lot of people because it's
Speaker 1: uncomfortable to hear some of the things I have to say,
Speaker 1: and it's not popular anyway. Let's see where they go
Speaker 1: with the Epstein files pivot.
Speaker 5: Well, it's pretty weird, and they like the Trump administration
Speaker 5: came in with this big show of releasing the files
Speaker 5: and then a bunch is blacked out and they made
Speaker 5: that one look yet stranger.
Speaker 1: Okay, now that's an interesting take on the Epstein Files.
Speaker 1: But I also am wholly distracted by the fact that
Speaker 1: Andrew Sullivan, who's on there, is clearly gay.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure if this guy is out and out
Speaker 2: declared as gay.
Speaker 1: Or identifying as a transsexual trisexual by bipricated, profoundly segregated sexuality.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but I take note that there is
Speaker 1: an affect to so many people's speeches that men are
Speaker 1: generally being allowed to voice themselves more if they kind
Speaker 1: of have a gay drag on their voice a bit
Speaker 1: and they sound like maybe they're boutless through it, and
Speaker 1: that gets them more tension and they're more acceptable in
Speaker 1: all media circles if they do that.
Speaker 2: But anyway, because Trump knew him, you mean you.
Speaker 5: Think I'm not making any positions on this. I'm just
Speaker 5: saying that when you come and he makes such a
Speaker 5: big show.
Speaker 2: Of now look at the stuttering, stammering, and how he
Speaker 2: has to increase his rate of speech.
Speaker 1: It becomes rapid because he's nervous. Don't even mention the
Speaker 1: Trump new Epstein.
Speaker 2: Classification.
Speaker 5: And you're going to tell aybody everything and it comes
Speaker 5: out and you don't.
Speaker 1: It's a little weird, right, Well, I see how he
Speaker 1: winds down with an imprecise comment and observation that really
Speaker 1: means nothing. I mean as in it is utterly meaningless.
Speaker 1: His wind up to this observation and then he has
Speaker 1: to go well when it comes to Trump, you know,
Speaker 1: and not much got to it. But you know, it's
Speaker 1: kind of strange. It like makes a strange situation look stranger.
Speaker 1: It almost makes a suspect situation look more suspect in
Speaker 1: that they didn't release more Epstein stuff after making a
Speaker 1: big deal out of it and done out. And it
Speaker 1: doesn't even have to be done with the gay draw.
Speaker 3: Say, whenever there's a guy with a lot of money
Speaker 3: and you don't quite know how he got it, he's
Speaker 3: probably some kind.
Speaker 2: Of a pimp.
Speaker 1: Okay, now, he's probably some kind of a pimp. Is
Speaker 1: Bill Maher's preloaded response to the Epstein thing. No matter
Speaker 1: what these guys were going to say on the panel,
Speaker 1: mar was ready and loaded with that in his back pocket.
Speaker 1: It was the backup revolver to him out there on
Speaker 1: the hunt for relevance in the current media.
Speaker 2: Landscape.
Speaker 3: I've saved this before. I mean, that was Epstein's That
Speaker 3: was Epstein's magic power. It's like rich guys want to
Speaker 3: get laid, and sometimes it's like it's hard because they're famous.
Speaker 1: Or they have a wife or you know, do you
Speaker 1: really think it boils down to that, Bill, I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, keep the controversy down my friend. Anyway, let's
Speaker 1: go to JFK Fax and you know, Jefferson Morley also
Speaker 1: this week held a press conference on Thursday night, which
Speaker 1: prevented me from going live because they did it at
Speaker 1: the same time my live show airs. So what did
Speaker 1: I do is I kind of let you guys in
Speaker 1: on it if you didn't want to attend the giant
Speaker 1: zoom meeting with over four hundred attendees, including various members
Speaker 1: of the press. Representative Luna was there all that stuff
Speaker 1: you might hear replay here and there on the Ocelli
Speaker 1: dot com radio stream of that unauthorized audio.
Speaker 2: But at jfkfactx dot.
Speaker 1: Com, Jefferson Morley has been releasing it piece by piece
Speaker 1: to feature his commentary, of course, and his perspective as
Speaker 1: he gave it that night, but in more easily consumable pieces.
Speaker 1: But there are more than just Jefferson Morley at JFK Facts,
Speaker 1: and I go to their substack right now and I'll
Speaker 1: put the link in the live chatroom at Ochelly dot com.
Speaker 1: It will be included with the show notes, et cetera,
Speaker 1: et cetera. But let us now pivot to where Bill
Speaker 1: Maher pivoted to allegedly when he was questioned by the audience,
Speaker 1: and I am constantly questioned by what audience I have
Speaker 1: left about the JFK files situation, declassification progress in the case.
Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, I'll also include in this
Speaker 1: perhaps in the show notes. May maybe I'll include it
Speaker 1: in future show notes. But either way, Yeah, I'm actually
Speaker 1: involved in the planning this time at Lancer, and we
Speaker 1: had a conference call on Sunday about it, and it
Speaker 1: is under new ownership JFK Lancer. The entirety of the
Speaker 1: board has changed. Larry Hancock will likely handle the online
Speaker 1: Facebook you know, interaction during the conference, but outside of that,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm gonna try and convince him on Wednesday
Speaker 1: when I.
Speaker 2: Talked to him privately to see if he'll be.
Speaker 1: A presenter even if David Boylen shows up in person,
Speaker 1: and you know, Larry does a remote like you did
Speaker 1: last year. I think it'll be effective, helpful and oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, help to sell that book, which is
Speaker 1: excellent and I have now gone back and made references
Speaker 1: to it at various times in my own personal research,
Speaker 1: and that is the Oswald puzzle. But anyway, incredibly interesting
Speaker 1: some of these fascinating pieces being produced through the JFK
Speaker 1: Facts website and content creation over there, and Jeff Morley
Speaker 1: is the head of it, but is not the only guy.
Speaker 1: In an article written by Chad Nagel, JFK Records release
Speaker 1: brings quote Loan Gunman end quote theorists out of the
Speaker 1: woodwork with the recent and sub headline. With the recent declassifications,
Speaker 1: proponents of the assassinations outdated official narrative are re emerging
Speaker 1: to restate their stale version of events. And I'll read
Speaker 1: in part from that article with the full release of
Speaker 1: over sixty thousand now it's sixty thousand, by the way,
Speaker 1: previously redacted pages related to JFK's assassination from the JFK
Speaker 1: collection in the National Archive on Tuesday, March eighteen, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, correction to you, mister Nagel. It did
Speaker 1: continue passed the March eighteen date, and they were continuing
Speaker 1: to release stuff. And I'm not sure what the full
Speaker 1: count is, but anyway, back to your article on March eighteen,
Speaker 1: Advocates of the official story in quotes embodied in nineteen
Speaker 1: sixty four's final report of the President's Commission on the
Speaker 1: Assassination of President John F. Kennedy in parentheses the Warrant
Speaker 1: Report have reappeared to tell us s this is ut
Speaker 1: quote see question mark, nothing to see there, exclamation point
Speaker 1: and closed quotations their aim to marginalize and foster insecurity
Speaker 1: amongst skeptics. These advocates of the quote lone gunmen end
Speaker 1: quote theory of the assassination are reasserting the idea that
Speaker 1: all dissenters are either dishonest or mentally unsound, a bunch
Speaker 1: of wacky, disingenuous quote conspiracy freaks end quote who just
Speaker 1: don't want to accept quote the truth end quote. Now
Speaker 1: all these quotations, they don't have attribution, but they must
Speaker 1: means something anyway. Back to mister Nagel's article. That is,
Speaker 1: regardless of whatever new facts emerged from the latest declassification process,
Speaker 1: the truth for Warren Report defenders is already.
Speaker 2: Carved in stone.
Speaker 1: A quote lone nut end quote, alienated, disturbed, and ultimately
Speaker 1: homicidally violent, acted pretty much spontaneously, entirely alone and on
Speaker 1: his own volition to kill the president on November twenty second,
Speaker 1: nineteen sixty three. Four motives only he knew, but his
Speaker 1: quote left wing extremism, end quote, is all we need
Speaker 1: to know about what motivated him, what they ignore in
Speaker 1: this the first stage. Only documents from the so called
Speaker 1: JFK collection in the National.
Speaker 2: Archives have so far appeared.
Speaker 1: These files are not the entire corpus of assassination related
Speaker 1: records sought by serious re researchers and historians. Now that
Speaker 1: whole article, that whole piece I just read you is,
Speaker 1: you know, absolutely salient, except for the minor things that
Speaker 1: I pointed out, And I would say, you know, mister Nagel,
Speaker 1: I would love to republish this on O'Kelly dot com,
Speaker 1: but I doubt I will receive any you know what,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna do that. As soon as I'm done with
Speaker 1: this broadcast. I'm gonna take this and I'm going to, yeah,
Speaker 1: attempt to reach out to them and see if they'll
Speaker 1: allow me to republish that. I got other things to
Speaker 1: discuss tonight, But there are many things that need to
Speaker 1: be related to the general.
Speaker 2: Public, which I would like to help in distributing if we.
Speaker 1: Can, you know, but we do, unfortunately live in deportation
Speaker 1: nation where there is a great deal of other things
Speaker 1: going on.
Speaker 2: For that, I'm gonna go back to Jakes B.
Speaker 1: Satilly's newsvandal is rundown at the newsmandle dot com and
Speaker 1: just again dance through a couple of the other sections
Speaker 1: of the rundown. If you don't mind, just to set
Speaker 1: up what I'm about to play next Greenland's prime minister, you.
Speaker 2: Will be uh egged.
Speaker 1: I guess e g E d E slams planned US
Speaker 1: visit as quote very aggressive American pressure end quote is
Speaker 1: from the New York Post dot com and from Americanthinker
Speaker 1: dot com. Usha Vance goes to Greenland just as the
Speaker 1: normally polite names are getting pretty hostile. That's from again
Speaker 1: the Americanthinker dot com.
Speaker 4: UH.
Speaker 1: Denmark's defense committee head says he regrets choosing the F
Speaker 1: thirty five. We must avoid American weapons it at all possible,
Speaker 1: According to Business outs Insider excuse me, business Insider dot
Speaker 1: com US only least Israel unleashed. Israel is in quotes
Speaker 1: with all the weapons and needs, says Trump Deputy envoy
Speaker 1: that is from the Middle eastiye dot net. Children in
Speaker 1: Gadza deeply traumatized as Israel expands military operations.
Speaker 2: Again.
Speaker 1: This is from PBS dot org, and I point out
Speaker 1: This is again one of the underreported things that would
Speaker 1: be the main headline had we not been dealing with
Speaker 1: the zone being flooded, as mister Bannon said we would anyway,
Speaker 1: let's go to.
Speaker 2: CNN dot com.
Speaker 1: Why not in JP's rundown, I would prefer this overkilling children.
Speaker 1: I would prefer this overkilling children. That's in quotes why
Speaker 1: some Israeli teens are choosing jail over the army. Oh,
Speaker 1: I see, I would choose. I would prefer this.
Speaker 2: There should be a comma there overkilling children.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: Then, so some Israeli children are refusing, or some Israeli
Speaker 1: young people are refusing to go into the army because
Speaker 1: they know they're gonna be sent out to slaughter Palestinian children. Okay,
Speaker 1: and I think that's just, you know, part of our propaganda.
Speaker 1: Watch for this episode, because I doubt that is the
Speaker 1: situation anyway. Uh, Pandora's box cutter. I'm gonna leave that
Speaker 1: one go for this time. Let's go to the media
Speaker 1: scrum instead. Cable TV networks could soon lose seven billion
Speaker 1: every year as one of their biggest revenue sources could
Speaker 1: soon be banned. Okay, this is from cord Cultures News
Speaker 1: dot Com and I will dig into this article just
Speaker 1: a bit and see what they have to say here,
Speaker 1: because this sounds pretty interesting and it was published. Let's
Speaker 1: see today anyway. Cable taelevision, already grappling with a steady
Speaker 1: decline and ad revenue, now faces a potential isamac shift.
Speaker 2: As Robert F.
Speaker 1: Kennedy Junior, the newly appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Speaker 1: renews is called the ban pharmaceutical advertisements on TV. The proposal,
Speaker 1: which Kennedy has championed for months, could strip away one
Speaker 1: of the industry's largest revenue sources. And all I got
Speaker 1: to say there is wow and wow, because there's a
Speaker 1: hell of a positive thing that he could do.
Speaker 2: Now will he do it? Will he be allowed to
Speaker 2: do it?
Speaker 1: I mean because cutting the gatzis off of one of
Speaker 1: the biggest money machines and cash registers available to the
Speaker 1: larger corporate media entities, And I do mean one of
Speaker 1: the absolute largest, without question donors possible to the efforts
Speaker 1: to continuously barrage us with propaganda on all sides, mind you, okay,
Speaker 1: but on all but one of the biggest moneymakers and
Speaker 1: money producers for those that produce content in the corporate
Speaker 1: world big pharma. Imagine CNN would have one commercial for break,
Speaker 1: MSNBC would run out of stuff to run outside of
Speaker 1: some of its political ads. I guess that they run
Speaker 1: every time, no matter if it's a political cycle or not.
Speaker 1: They're gonna get you involved in super PACs or whatever.
Speaker 1: And even Fox News will take heavy hits. So there's
Speaker 1: nobody in the political spectrum that is not going to
Speaker 1: lose hundreds of millions of dollars if they actually ban
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical ads. Okay, but what else are they going to
Speaker 1: do with themselves? I got bad news for you, and
Speaker 1: the bad news comes from some of the stuff where
Speaker 1: they're not producing news, but they are producing propaganda and
Speaker 1: not telling you full stories on stuff instead recycling older
Speaker 1: things like Howard Stern, and of course his army of
Speaker 1: interns and other underpaid employees are out there trying to
Speaker 1: make sure that he remains relevant so that he can
Speaker 1: justify his contract which pays him, you know, a poultry
Speaker 1: third of what Joe Rogan gets per year. But XM
Speaker 1: serious without Howard Stern, I think is out of business.
Speaker 1: But let's take a look at how they try to
Speaker 1: make him relevant and put him in one of the
Speaker 1: cars on the media Trump train one way or another.
Speaker 6: But the magic of the Trump Stern dynamic was that
Speaker 6: it was mutually beneficial. Trump got exactly what he wanted airtime.
Speaker 6: He didn't care what he was saying as long as
Speaker 6: people were listening. Stern, on the other hand, got a
Speaker 6: live action cartoon character to parade around for entertainment. They
Speaker 6: were both using each other, but only one of them
Speaker 6: seemed to understand that fact.
Speaker 1: Okay, so when you are now president, but you used
Speaker 1: to be friends with Howard Stern, or if your fame
Speaker 1: rises or whatever, Howard Stern is either going to covertly
Speaker 1: or overtly put out there that, hey, this guy was
Speaker 1: my friend and blah blah blah blah. Now now listen
Speaker 1: to what I have to say about it. And oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, you can sign up for twenty dollars
Speaker 1: or twenty five or thirty whatever it is they charge
Speaker 1: now for XM serious radio.
Speaker 2: And buy radio and do all that stuff.
Speaker 1: Instead of just you know, finding a podcast or a
Speaker 1: broadcast network that exists out there for free, pay us
Speaker 1: to do that. They now have apps and everything, so
Speaker 1: you don't necessarily need to buy the radio but it
Speaker 1: helps if you have one in your car for sure,
Speaker 1: and when you go home you can plug into their
Speaker 1: ad ad generating what do you call it app? Yeah,
Speaker 1: because they have an app based system now too very quietly,
Speaker 1: but I love serious sm radio, you know FXM, excuse
Speaker 1: me radio sm XM radio.
Speaker 2: I loved it, I really did.
Speaker 1: And in fact I have to confess, just like you know,
Speaker 1: an alcoholic about to tell you the most horrible story,
Speaker 1: the most terrible thing he ever did when he was drunk.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you that I was a devout follower
Speaker 1: of Howard Stern's. I used to listen to him, tape him,
Speaker 1: observe what he did. I mean, I absolutely do not
Speaker 1: utilize any of that in what I do today. But
Speaker 1: he was literally the king of talk radio, at least
Speaker 1: to me, even though he declared himself to be the
Speaker 1: king of all media. And Donald Trump would have went
Speaker 1: by as one of the fascinating characters in the continuing
Speaker 1: Freak Show line of guests for Howard Stern, but one
Speaker 1: day this guy actually became president. And Howard has been
Speaker 1: trying to figure out a way to keep his politically correct,
Speaker 1: leftist sort of credentials intact while saying at the same time, Hey,
Speaker 1: I was friends with Donald Trump. Hey, maybe I could
Speaker 1: call him up and get something done. Hey remember the
Speaker 1: FCC going down? My I ask for everything.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's not happening no more.
Speaker 1: I mean it can't because he's not on publicly broadcasting
Speaker 1: airwaves any longer. But let's just say one day he
Speaker 1: did have to go slumming and return to it. It
Speaker 1: might help if Donald changed the rules, or if he
Speaker 1: was still part of the dynasty that I believe they're
Speaker 1: trying to build. And who knows, maybe Don Junior's in
Speaker 1: the office. He might remember how good old Howard was
Speaker 1: well more than fair to Daddy's beautiful.
Speaker 2: By the way, she's beautiful. It's kind of saying it's
Speaker 2: a piece of ass.
Speaker 7: Is the last couple of years ago out with somebody
Speaker 7: and she's like twenty one and she's talking about you know,
Speaker 7: what are you doing? And she's studying algebra and so
Speaker 7: what it's like there was always embarrassing for me to walk.
Speaker 8: And it's too young.
Speaker 6: Thirty is like a perfect age.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, she had enough flaff expirrel. She's thirty five.
Speaker 1: See, thirty is a perfect age. He was saying this
Speaker 1: twenty two years ago. So I mean, if you roll
Speaker 1: it back and think to you yourself, Trump is fifty
Speaker 1: what at the time he's saying this, Well, you.
Speaker 2: Know, twenty one year olds.
Speaker 1: I was dating them, but they were, you know, not
Speaker 1: quite good enough because they're studying algebra or some math
Speaker 1: or's you know, reading something.
Speaker 2: And how boring and embarrassing is that You're just supposed
Speaker 2: to be beautiful?
Speaker 1: By the way, was he talking about his daughter or
Speaker 1: was he talking about the twenty one year olds he
Speaker 1: was dating allegedly or allegedly dating twenty two year olds,
Speaker 1: or maybe they were allegedly twenty two or twenty one.
Speaker 1: Let's keep listening and see what else this guy pulled
Speaker 1: together in his clips. And oh, by the way, I
Speaker 1: will give you a link to this in thelive chat
Speaker 1: Atocelli dot com. But also I'll give you the full
Speaker 1: the full guy's YouTube channel presentation and not YouTube YouTube
Speaker 1: video presentation that he has on his channel, not necessarily
Speaker 1: endorsing it, but you know, you can follow through in
Speaker 1: your own way and find out what the Donald actually
Speaker 1: had to say.
Speaker 2: To Stern.
Speaker 6: Too much and then the fall the bromance didn't just fade.
Speaker 6: It crashed and burned with the force of a failed
Speaker 6: Trump casino. Stern, who had spent decades being an equal
Speaker 6: opportunity offender, suddenly found himself in a world where Trump
Speaker 6: wasn't just a punchline.
Speaker 1: Okay, so suddenly found himself in a world where Trump
Speaker 1: wasn't just a punchline. And we're gonna let that commercial
Speaker 1: go by and see if we can get through it
Speaker 1: without having to screw around with you know, you guys
Speaker 1: actually having to hear it. And we'll get back to
Speaker 1: the clip because now he's explaining how, you know, Trump
Speaker 1: goes from being a punchline to what.
Speaker 6: Let's see, he was running for president and worse, he won.
Speaker 6: The chaotic court Jester of the Stern Show was now
Speaker 6: aiming for the Oval office, and suddenly it wasn't funny anymore.
Speaker 6: Stern flipped. Trump felt betrayed. There once golden friendship built
Speaker 6: on bad jokes and oversized egos crumbled under the weight
Speaker 6: of real world consequences.
Speaker 1: Okay, Now, the funny thing is that this guy you
Speaker 1: know is obviously trying to get lots of attention, and
Speaker 1: he's doing pretty well. He put this out seven days ago,
Speaker 1: and let's see, he's got five thousand, almost six thousand
Speaker 1: likes on this thing. Thumbs up. I see no thumbs
Speaker 1: down being displayed. It was put out yes, seven days ago,
Speaker 1: according to what it says on YouTube, and has about
Speaker 1: a quarter million views. So him headlining it, as you know,
Speaker 1: Trump explodes as Howard Stern mocks him on live TV.
Speaker 1: I mean, is this the big wind up? Or is
Speaker 1: he going to talk about how it was live TV
Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty eight? I mean, you know, where are
Speaker 1: we going here? You know, And this, by the way,
Speaker 1: goes with f with Trump at your own risk or
Speaker 1: f with MAGA and find out you know, the the
Speaker 1: lately very very much used right claims about you know
Speaker 1: around and find out baby right, the failing New York
Speaker 1: Times CNN who's awful and has terrible ratings, et cetera,
Speaker 1: et cetera. But I'm gonna go after them. They should
Speaker 1: be illegal. And then somebody has to remind him here
Speaker 1: or there that, hey, look, dude, it's not necessarily a
Speaker 1: good idea to talk this way about what it is
Speaker 1: you're talking about, because realistically, the president of the United
Speaker 1: States is not supposed to even though in a lot
Speaker 1: of ways they can and other presidents have had wars
Speaker 1: with the First Amendment before, including Roosevelt, you know, the
Speaker 1: darling of the liberal intelligentsia. In historical terms, even that
Speaker 1: guy kind of went to war with the Constitution, I mean,
Speaker 1: squashed individuals who were involved in God help us all,
Speaker 1: you know, informing people about wars and things. He definitely
Speaker 1: silenced critics and put to bed a bunch of assertions
Speaker 1: that would have been negative during his presidency. And that's
Speaker 1: just one example of a guy shutting things down. A
Speaker 1: guy named Lincoln did it too with the press, and
Speaker 1: on and on. We could go many people left right
Speaker 1: center wigs, tories, and even parties that I don't even
Speaker 1: know if they really ever existed, all at different times
Speaker 1: crushing that allegedly allegedly sacred cow that is the freedom
Speaker 1: of speech and freedom of press in America.
Speaker 6: And Trump being Trump, did what he does best, throw
Speaker 6: a tantrum and burned the bridge to ash. But now,
Speaker 6: all these years later, Stern has come back swinging. Because
Speaker 6: if there's one thing he knows better than anyone, it's
Speaker 6: that once a joke, always a joke, and the latest bombshell,
Speaker 6: Oh it's a doozy. If you thought Trump embarrassing himself
Speaker 6: on Stern's show was bad. You haven't seen anything yet.
Speaker 6: Howard Stern and Donald Trump were once like two loudmouth
Speaker 6: peas in a gold plated pod. Trump would waltz into
Speaker 6: stern studio, basking the attention and say things no sane
Speaker 6: person running for office would ever admit out loud.
Speaker 9: Well, Trump hands down whenever you put him on the air. Now,
Speaker 9: this is before he was running for president. He was
Speaker 9: an open book. He would say anything. And you know,
Speaker 9: oddly enough, during the campaign and even now, people quote
Speaker 9: these interviews that any big time. It was quite surprised
Speaker 9: when they dragged out every single Donald Trump interview I
Speaker 9: had done.
Speaker 2: See, it's not a surprise.
Speaker 1: He has actually participated in this and again through surrogates,
Speaker 1: pushed it out there. He wants to maintain relevance because
Speaker 1: who in the hell is paying attention to satellite radio
Speaker 1: at this point. And it's also wondrous to take a
Speaker 1: look at even the bad remnants of the sloppy you know,
Speaker 1: what do you call that?
Speaker 2: Anyway? I don't know.
Speaker 1: It used to be called a van dyke, where you
Speaker 1: allowed a little beard piece to grow and no go
Speaker 1: like half a goatee, but just the lower half. Anyway,
Speaker 1: He's not only dyed his slightly puffy jebro, but he's
Speaker 1: also done it to this, uh you know, bad facial hair.
Speaker 1: He's got run in here again trying to appear young.
Speaker 1: It's funny, and he's being interviewed. It looks like on
Speaker 1: ABC somebody's deciding to interview him. And the caption reads
Speaker 1: New This Morning, Howard Stern, one on one radio legend
Speaker 1: on Trump quote he would say anything anyway. Of course,
Speaker 1: that's part of the point. But let's let's go further.
Speaker 9: And in some ways I felt it was unfair to
Speaker 9: Trump because like, for example, they were fond of quoting
Speaker 9: that Donald Trump had something to said, something to the
Speaker 9: effect that STDs were his personal Vietnam.
Speaker 6: Stern, being the king of chaos, would tee up the
Speaker 6: most absurd, over the top questions, and Trump, desperate to
Speaker 6: be liked by the cool kids, would answer with the
Speaker 6: enthusiasm of a man who just discovered microphones exist. It
Speaker 6: was a bromance built on mutual ego stroking, and for
Speaker 6: a while it worked like a charm.
Speaker 1: See this very much reminds me of this little thing
Speaker 1: that used to go on when I was a kid
Speaker 1: and we discovered that you could take a boombox or
Speaker 1: various radios and they had a microphone on them and
Speaker 1: you could just record you and your friends saying and
Speaker 1: doing wacky things on audio and play them back and
Speaker 1: laugh hysterically at cursing, fart jokes, or even farting directly
Speaker 1: on your boombox. You know, you're farting on your boombox
Speaker 1: to get the best noise. Stuff like this, and that's
Speaker 1: what it reminds me of and people when they go
Speaker 1: into radio stations, not for the first time, but sometimes
Speaker 1: for the first time, but definitely when it's kind of
Speaker 1: new to them and they start to realize that they're
Speaker 1: reaching millions of people that they don't have to look
Speaker 1: in the face or hundred Even if you're looking at
Speaker 1: hundreds of people on a small signal in a local area,
Speaker 1: you know, somebody will walk up to you who knows
Speaker 1: you or vaguely knows you and go, hey, I heard
Speaker 1: you on the I couldn't believe you said or did this,
Speaker 1: and you were talking about it, and you can baskin
Speaker 1: some attention there that is really interesting. It's like showing
Speaker 1: up on TV for any reason, and somebody recognizes you.
Speaker 1: Donald got access to unedited, unfiltered, unfettered live radio more
Speaker 1: with the Stern Show than he did any other radio
Speaker 1: show for decades.
Speaker 2: And in a way, Trump is probably real and probably.
Speaker 1: Doesn't realize at all. Actually nobody on his team realizes
Speaker 1: that the reach of Howard Stern at the time that
Speaker 1: Trump was a super popular guest, probably assisted, believe it
Speaker 1: or not, in burning him forever into the minds of
Speaker 1: millions of listeners. For Stern, Stern had millions of listeners.
Speaker 1: I don't know what his deal is today, but he
Speaker 1: had millions of listeners, some of them very impressionable and
Speaker 1: some of them so tribe oriented, well ahead of the
Speaker 1: current curve of the politics where it's like be on
Speaker 1: my team or to hell with you completely, you and
Speaker 1: your family. You should be deported, you should be dead
Speaker 1: if you disagree with great.
Speaker 2: Leader, to hell with you.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a real thing, and that was really happening.
Speaker 1: And Trump may have been very much inadvertently assisted by
Speaker 1: this to his rise to power. Legitimacy granted to him
Speaker 1: because of this, believe it or not, exactly the opposite
Speaker 1: of what this media person and this YouTube creator whose
Speaker 1: name is let's see well, the YouTube channel is America Unfiltered,
Speaker 1: which is obviously the point of what he's trying to
Speaker 1: do here. Even this guy is probably gonna make all
Speaker 1: of the wrong assumptions about what the real impact and
Speaker 1: the lasting impact indeed of the Stern interviews and the
Speaker 1: fact that him and his cronies and his surrogates are
Speaker 1: out there. I do mean Stern are out there pushing
Speaker 1: the old pieces of tape out there to remind people
Speaker 1: before this guy was president, guess what I had?
Speaker 2: Aren't I cool?
Speaker 1: Maybe you should remember to pay attention to my new
Speaker 1: stuff where you know, I go in early in the
Speaker 1: morning and I grumble about it. But that's the only
Speaker 1: way I know how to live, because I've been doing
Speaker 1: that for fifty years now, folks, says my imaginary concept
Speaker 1: of Howard Stern in my own head. Anyway, let's get
Speaker 1: back to this video for a minute, but I'm not
Speaker 1: going to stick with it too much longer, because there
Speaker 1: is so much more to cover, uncover and recover from
Speaker 1: in the new cycle.
Speaker 2: As it has been for the past week, then twenty
Speaker 2: sixteen happened.
Speaker 6: Trump wants the ultimate guest for Stern's let's see how
Speaker 6: ridiculous this can get style of radio, decided he wasn't
Speaker 6: just going to be the punchline. He was going to
Speaker 6: run the whole damn circus.
Speaker 1: Oh missed opportunity there. He decided he was going to
Speaker 1: be the joke and the punchline from now on. But anyway,
Speaker 1: let's see what this guy has to say.
Speaker 6: Further, He dove headfirst into the mega movement, while Stern,
Speaker 6: a guy who had spent years roasting hypocrisy for a living,
Speaker 6: looked at the spectacle and went, oh hell no. Stern
Speaker 6: backed Hillary Clinton, which to Trump was the ultimate betrayal
Speaker 6: because in Trump's world, loyalty is not a two way street,
Speaker 6: It's a one lane road paved in gold. Leading directly
Speaker 6: to his ego, Stern always wanted to call out nonsense
Speaker 6: when he sees it. Started dragging Trump's presidency like a
Speaker 6: bad reality TV show that somehow got renewed for four
Speaker 6: seasons too many.
Speaker 2: Okay, interesting concept, but again he.
Speaker 1: Has falsely, falsely equivocated this to the wrong stuff.
Speaker 2: All the way around.
Speaker 1: Stern is utilizing this for a completely different reason. And
Speaker 1: Stern had to back Hillary and had to back the
Speaker 1: left wing candidates.
Speaker 2: No matter what.
Speaker 1: Even though it is con well, it contrasts. It absolutely contravenes.
Speaker 1: It is a complete turnaround from where this guy would
Speaker 1: logically land. He should be with the chaos candidate. He
Speaker 1: should be with the guy who is a disruptive person, because.
Speaker 2: That's his clan.
Speaker 1: He is the class clown after all, overgrown, overaged, way
Speaker 1: well over the hill maybe, but he's the king of
Speaker 1: the class clowns, not necessarily the king of all media,
Speaker 1: as he declared himself to be, but definitely somebody who
Speaker 1: is interesting and has been interesting as an interviewer, etc.
Speaker 2: Etc. But the point is.
Speaker 1: Cern had to back Hillary. But how did Trump take it?
Speaker 1: I don't think he really cared because I don't think
Speaker 1: he sees Stern as all that relevant. He is just
Speaker 1: a wrong on the ladder that he stepped on on
Speaker 1: his way to elevating himself to a point of being
Speaker 1: taken seriously by the massive corporate meeting, which would normally
Speaker 1: again be an absolute opposition.
Speaker 2: Howard's turned anything he supports. So are you getting how
Speaker 2: this game is played? Yet?
Speaker 1: Of course John Cena had to be the bad guy
Speaker 1: recently in the WWE and turn on Cody Rhodes at
Speaker 1: the best of the rock in front of a live audience,
Speaker 1: who gives the cut his throat signal. There's nobody else
Speaker 1: who could have done that, or should have done that,
Speaker 1: or had to do that. And then he had to
Speaker 1: tell people it's because he was underappreciated all these years.
Speaker 1: Well that's more of really why Donald was motivated personally
Speaker 1: to go forward with his thing. He was underappreciated and
Speaker 1: he wasn't being taken seriously enough. So how do I
Speaker 1: be taken seriously? If Barack Obama can be taken seriously
Speaker 1: that Kenyon that everybody laughed at me for calling.
Speaker 2: Out, then I absolutely can be taken seriously.
Speaker 6: He went from playfully teasing Trump about his bizarre life
Speaker 6: choices to flat out saying this guy is running the
Speaker 6: country like a game show host who lost the Can.
Speaker 2: You please just hear me out?
Speaker 9: No?
Speaker 2: No, all work management platforms.
Speaker 1: With the Okay, sorry about that again, we get interrupted
Speaker 1: by the h you know, commercials on YouTube. I'm not
Speaker 1: paying Google for that. I already pay them for something
Speaker 1: else and probably other things through a surrogate, but enough
Speaker 1: is enough. I'm not paying Google to have commercial free YouTube,
Speaker 1: So sorry, about that cards. He called the presidency a disaster, which,
Speaker 1: let's be honest, was like calling a five alarm fire
Speaker 1: a bit of a situation. Stern wasn't pulling punches, and Trump, well,
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't do constructive criticism.
Speaker 2: The man thinks every critique is a personal attack.
Speaker 6: Which is ironic coming from someone who spent half his
Speaker 6: career firing people on television. So Trump did what he
Speaker 6: does best. He threw a tantrum. The days of buddy
Speaker 6: buddy interviews.
Speaker 1: And I'm allowed to criticize people, I'm allowed to put
Speaker 1: them down and insult them. But don't you dare insult
Speaker 1: me or anybody that I happened to have proof of.
Speaker 6: This week, ward oversharing were over. Trump turned on Stern
Speaker 6: like an expired carton of milk, vast sour and with
Speaker 6: a whole lot of unnecessary noise. Suddenly Howard was a
Speaker 6: bad guy, a phony and out of touch media elite,
Speaker 6: which is rich coming from a guy who once put
Speaker 6: gold toilet seats in a plane. The playful banter gone,
Speaker 6: The bizarre oversharing confessions dead on arrival. Now it was
Speaker 6: just another name on Trump's ever growing list of people
Speaker 6: who hurt my feelings and must be punished immediately.
Speaker 2: The media is the enemy of the people. In Howard
Speaker 2: Stern is one of those enemies.
Speaker 1: But unfortunately he's not even relevant enough for me to
Speaker 1: go after, because if he was really a failing loser,
Speaker 1: then it wouldn't matter.
Speaker 2: I would just let him fail. And I have many
Speaker 2: other people that I can go after.
Speaker 6: And then there was Milania, silent, expressionless, staring off into
Speaker 6: the void like a woman whose soul left her body
Speaker 6: sometime around the Apprentice era.
Speaker 1: See this is where we have to assume that Millennia
Speaker 1: Trump had a soul in the first place.
Speaker 2: But I know people are gonna be mad. Why are
Speaker 2: you taking Melonia? I know, I know, don't waste your
Speaker 2: time with the messages.
Speaker 6: Okay, she had always been more of a background character
Speaker 6: in Trump's chaotic world, but as the rip between Trump
Speaker 6: and Stern deepened, Millenia's silence became deafening.
Speaker 1: I got to give him points for this because he
Speaker 1: almost said what I think, which is that effectively, Milania
Speaker 1: is an NPC in the Trump video game, whether he's
Speaker 1: playing it, or we're playing it, or we're just watching
Speaker 1: the in game pieces, where you know it goes to
Speaker 1: a cinematic part that you're supposed to watch because you
Speaker 1: achieved some part of the game. You've lived long enough
Speaker 1: to get to this, so you get to watch it.
Speaker 1: She's just part of that in my mind. And she's
Speaker 1: definitely an NPC. You're not meant to interact with her really,
Speaker 1: and you know, she says what's scripted for a reason,
Speaker 1: just like when Hulk Hogan and Macho Man Randy Savage
Speaker 1: were arguing over who indeed is the best person to
Speaker 1: protect Miss Elizabeth some of.
Speaker 7: Them, And like Howard, I was on Howard Stern show
Speaker 7: as much as anybody, and he was great at that time,
Speaker 7: and then he went woke. And since he's gone woke,
Speaker 7: his ratings have gone down the tubes and he sort
Speaker 7: of went anti.
Speaker 1: He was great at that time, then he went woke.
Speaker 1: Howard Stern was always on the leftist side of things,
Speaker 1: and the two of them should come together on the
Speaker 1: idea that they're both pro Israel to an extreme degree.
Speaker 1: But that doesn't work. And funny thing is he's talking
Speaker 1: about Howard Stern's ratings. I don't think that ratings are
Speaker 1: collected for satellite radio. If they are, they're done internally
Speaker 1: and they're competing with themselves. They're not in the regular market,
Speaker 1: and they're not being taken out there like Nielsen and
Speaker 1: the Home Family thing and Arbitron and all these other
Speaker 1: ratings things which account for what happens with broadcast media.
Speaker 1: Although broadcast those types of things, Nielsen and Arbitron and
Speaker 1: you know, and Birch and all these different companies that
Speaker 1: used to do that, they're still out there kind of
Speaker 1: doing it, and they have included some of the digital media.
Speaker 1: But I know for a fact that it really is
Speaker 1: not a factor when it comes to Howard Stern and
Speaker 1: what he does nowadays. So Trump is just making this
Speaker 1: up as he goes because there's no real analytics to
Speaker 1: back any of what he's saying here. It's just I
Speaker 1: don't like him anymore. So he's no good and he's
Speaker 1: not being all good to me now, so I don't
Speaker 1: like him.
Speaker 2: So he's failing.
Speaker 1: Like the New York Times, who has taken in about
Speaker 1: a billion dollars this past year in revenue. I don't
Speaker 1: know how you fail taking in a billion dollars unless
Speaker 1: you're spending more than a billion dollars, and I doubt
Speaker 1: the New York Times spent more more than a billion
Speaker 1: dollars this year. Plus somehow people are signing up for
Speaker 1: monthly subscriptions to The New York Times, so you can
Speaker 1: look at more than one article a month.
Speaker 2: So I don't know, I don't know the full.
Speaker 1: Story of their revenue, but what's being publicly shared. Failing
Speaker 1: is a hell of a thing if you're taking in
Speaker 1: a billion dollars worth of business. I mean, I would
Speaker 1: worry more about the fact that you're moron running something
Speaker 1: that has that much money coming into it. But then again,
Speaker 1: we have this thing called government, and you know, do
Speaker 1: they get the best people? Know?
Speaker 2: They send us.
Speaker 1: They send us people from the asylums that are criminals
Speaker 1: of all sorts, and some of them, I imagine are
Speaker 1: good people. But yeah, I'm talking about our government, by
Speaker 1: the way, not the Mexicans and whatnot. But anyhow, we'll
Speaker 1: get to that in a moment. Let's just stick with
Speaker 1: this for a minute more and then we'll get to
Speaker 1: some other interesting audio.
Speaker 2: Trump for a couple of reasons.
Speaker 9: But I was on his show a lot.
Speaker 7: Yeah, he has a best of did you ever see
Speaker 7: the best of?
Speaker 2: Best of?
Speaker 7: Howard Stern? I don't want to promote it necessarily and
Speaker 7: I was there for just about all of them, the
Speaker 7: best of We had good shows.
Speaker 2: Who was good?
Speaker 7: But he's changed and you know he doesn't do the
Speaker 7: ratings anymore.
Speaker 9: No, he doesn't, doesn't have to.
Speaker 2: He's almost finished.
Speaker 6: Kat Do you remember Howard would you take a fine?
Speaker 1: Okay, sure, he's almost finished and he doesn't do the ratings.
Speaker 1: And the best of Howard Stern? You ever see this,
Speaker 1: he's only been doing it for forty years. Whenever he
Speaker 1: goes on break, there's a best of Stern and Serious
Speaker 1: XM has two channels devoted to Howard Stern and only
Speaker 1: one of them runs the live you know show once
Speaker 1: a day when it's happening, and then immediately runs an
Speaker 1: after show while they're preparing.
Speaker 2: To do what rerun the show from that day.
Speaker 1: So and then on the other channel you never know,
Speaker 1: but they have a schedule I guess where they play
Speaker 1: all sorts of clips from the past and that's the
Speaker 1: exam experience. Meanwhile, you know, he's been around for fifty years.
Speaker 1: So going back to JP's rundown, just just per a
Speaker 1: quick look again at the rest of the media. Attorney
Speaker 1: General Bonta Urgent urgently issues consumer alert for twenty three
Speaker 1: in ME customers. That's from let's see a well oag
Speaker 1: dot c A dot gov.
Speaker 2: So there's a.
Speaker 1: Well a Canadian government story there anyway. Twenty three and
Speaker 1: ME bankruptcy updates stock falls to penny territory as California
Speaker 1: urges customers to.
Speaker 2: Delete their data.
Speaker 1: On twenty three in me, Google accidentally erases many users
Speaker 1: timeline data, wiping out years of travel, et cetera. That
Speaker 1: is from phone Arena dot com. Let's see Emergency Abundance
Speaker 1: in unveils Data City, Texas, world's largest twenty four to
Speaker 1: seven green powered data center with future hydrogen integration, no kidding.
Speaker 1: That is from fuel Sellsworks dot com. University at Utah
Speaker 1: partners with Abundance Institute in quest for unsurpassed social societal impact.
Speaker 1: That is from k s L dot com. Okay, the
Speaker 1: Meager Agenda of Abundance Liberals that is from The Washington
Speaker 1: Monthly dot com. And that ends is odds and ends.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: And I didn't even finish the media scrom you know,
Speaker 1: streaming TV, advertising, repeats, cables problems Simul Media's Jonathan Stirr. Okay,
Speaker 1: so that's from beat TV. Oh excuse me, beat dot
Speaker 1: TV b E E T so feet but with a
Speaker 1: b uh dot TV the new Deep State television. Okay,
Speaker 1: and that's from Slate dot com. Uh the boys squid
Speaker 1: game common side.
Speaker 2: Affects Trump TV shows anyway.
Speaker 1: Analyst cuts ads spending forecast, with streaming gaining while broadcasting
Speaker 1: cable decline in twenty twenty five. So in that first
Speaker 1: quarter they realize, guess what streaming is up, broadcast is down.
Speaker 1: Welcome to the twenty first century TV rev dot com,
Speaker 1: TVRV dot com anyway. That's the stuff from JP's newsmandal.
Speaker 1: And that's all there is to that. But let's get
Speaker 1: back to the serious news and deportation Nation, send them
Speaker 1: to jail. In quotes, GOP officials keep saying Trump can
Speaker 1: arrest people for protesting. Oh did I mention that already? Yes,
Speaker 1: I did, Mother Jones. Anyway, maybe we'll get into that.
Speaker 1: But I got other stuff to hit, including two time
Speaker 1: heavyweight champion George Foreman at the age of seventy six.
Speaker 1: And this actually made me pretty sad. And that happened
Speaker 1: on the twenty first again, a Friday incident that we
Speaker 1: didn't get to cover because I was on with nature.
Speaker 2: Boy doing the third rail.
Speaker 1: Anyway, let's go to business today, Dot I n okay
Speaker 1: more and this is the headline. Okay, more than fentanyl.
Speaker 1: Eggs now the most smuggled item from Canada to US.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: Since October, US Customs and Border Protection CBP has recorded
Speaker 1: three thousand, seven hundred and sixty eight seizures of bird
Speaker 1: and poultry related products at all US borders, compared to
Speaker 1: three hundred and fifty two ftanyl seizures in the same period.
Speaker 1: So if you're keeping score at home, what we're saying
Speaker 1: is less than ten percent, Okay, so ten times plus
Speaker 1: more seizures of eggs and poultry really products are coming
Speaker 1: and getting caught at the Canadian US border, ten times
Speaker 1: that of fentanyl because ventanyl is nearly a nothing thing
Speaker 1: coming from Canada. It's mostly coming from Mexico. If you
Speaker 1: want to watch a border from ventanyl. Anyway, Here it
Speaker 1: goes from the article, which is, let's give credit where
Speaker 1: credits due. Let's see it was updated March ninth, blah
Speaker 1: blah blah blah. Okay, should we give the author credit
Speaker 1: because it looks like it's just a staff written piece
Speaker 1: with no byline Anyway, let's just read the opening part
Speaker 1: of it. US border agents are seizing more legal eggs
Speaker 1: than fentanyl, has poultry smuggling surges amid soaring prices and
Speaker 1: avian flu concerns. Since October, US Customs End Border Protection
Speaker 1: has recorded. Yeah, just like I told you in the
Speaker 1: initial headline. So I'm pulling away from this already, but
Speaker 1: I find it interesting just in the headline itself. Okay,
Speaker 1: And if you don't, I don't know what to tell you.
Speaker 1: Cable TV networks could soon lose seven billion every year
Speaker 1: as one of their biggest revenue sources. See another one
Speaker 1: of these stories, and I say again, perhaps Robert F.
Speaker 1: Kennedy Junior is bringing a reckoning to the situation which
Speaker 1: is necessary and will be productive.
Speaker 2: How about that?
Speaker 8: I Yo Yovis Doug Campbell, host of the Dallas Action
Speaker 8: podcast presented by Wall Street Window, and you are listening
Speaker 8: to the o'chill effect revelation Through conversation, The War.
Speaker 10: State by Michael Swanson explains the great national transformation that
Speaker 10: took place and put the Kennedy presidency in the context
Speaker 10: of the times and reveals never before published information about
Speaker 10: the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not have been
Speaker 10: assassinated if he had been president too high undred years ago.
Speaker 10: His assassination took place in the context of the Cold
Speaker 10: War and the rise of the national security state. Before
Speaker 10: World War II, the United States was a continental republic.
Speaker 10: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower.
Speaker 10: Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 10: but knew that there were short range missiles on the
Speaker 10: island arn't with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy
Speaker 10: because they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have
Speaker 10: led to a Third World War, and they wanted to
Speaker 10: go to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson
Speaker 10: reveals why and will show you what President Kennedy was
Speaker 10: up against. For more information, the Warstate dot com to.
Speaker 1: Use expressed by cooler stools there anyone else who happens
Speaker 1: to get on the air of Jelly dot com do
Speaker 1: not necessarily reflect the views of the Jelly dot com
Speaker 1: or Jeff o'chelli, and we are.
Speaker 2: Not responsible for any stupidity which might ensue.
Speaker 8: Thank you, that is.
Speaker 11: Crim falls.
Speaker 12: Falls God to love, not fall that don't out there
Speaker 12: there dot on Earth.
Speaker 11: Come to bab, comes.
Speaker 13: To bable, comes a ball.
Speaker 11: That's from a someone. The last thing says thought Falter,
Speaker 11: not fall that, Oh no better bed dot wist.
Speaker 13: Talk to Bud, to Bud.
Speaker 10: To bu.
Speaker 11: Yeah exist start, I don't do that.
Speaker 13: Dunk all that do not up talk about come to boup,
Speaker 13: talk about.
Speaker 1: You. I know that.
Speaker 13: What's notice that's the sound forever hotel, free of friends,
Speaker 13: when it's still time.
Speaker 11: To die, Walter.
Speaker 13: THEA said, she that's got they go up their sun
Speaker 13: fall that don't go there, up there, got on als
Speaker 11: Come