Speaker 1: Bill cunning immigrant American walking this glory. It's Wednesday afternoon
Speaker 1: with Tries Day. I will I'll be with you tomorrow
Speaker 1: because the Reds baseball in Saint Louis during the afternoon.
Speaker 1: Let's face it, the Red's look impregnantle. The Reds are
Speaker 1: marching the glory when it doesn't matter, of course, so
Speaker 1: we'll see what happens. Tonight's starting about six ' ten
Speaker 1: with Lance mcgallister. I'm starting to like Lance McAllister either more.
Speaker 1: I like that guy. He's not as bad as he
Speaker 1: used to be. He's getting better, and congratulations to Lance.
Speaker 1: But until then, about ten forty five last night Eastern Time,
Speaker 1: I had a pit in my stomach. I had projectile vomiting,
Speaker 1: followed by explosive diarrhea. My eyeballs started flipping back in
Speaker 1: my head, and I had clustered migrane headaches, and then
Speaker 1: I started bleeding out. But at some point this morning,
Speaker 1: when I finally went to sleep at four or five o'clock,
Speaker 1: got two or three hours, said enough is enough. I
Speaker 1: must fight like a warrior poet. I must be like
Speaker 1: William of Wallace on the gurney with longshanks pulling out
Speaker 1: his intestines. I'm going to fight like crazy for the
Speaker 1: principles that I I love. I'm not voting for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm voting for the United States of America. And the debate,
Speaker 1: I think, in my view, was lost in a sense,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't matter. The issues remain this afternoon, John,
Speaker 1: and you and I now this Wednesday afternoon, as Congressman
Speaker 1: Warren Davidson, of course, one of the leaders conservative movements
Speaker 1: in the United States House of Representatives, and first of all, Congressman,
Speaker 1: give me your reaction to the great debate last night?
Speaker 1: Who won, who lost? And does it really matter? Does
Speaker 1: it change anything this afternoon?
Speaker 2: Well, you know, I tried to be as objective as
Speaker 2: I could, and of course, you know, you can only
Speaker 2: do the best you can because I'm not I'm I'm
Speaker 2: a partisan. I'm for the Republican Party. I'm for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: And look, it seems to me, I just kept looking
Speaker 2: at it going. You know, Trump looks a little angry,
Speaker 2: and I think, yeah, I'm angry. I'm mad. Biden Harris
Speaker 2: administration is doing things that are intentionally undermining the United
Speaker 2: States of America. When they said they wanted to fundamentally
Speaker 2: remake America. They mint it and they're doing policy after
Speaker 2: let's see that are causing real harm to our communities,
Speaker 2: the wreck in our economy, there, wreck in our national security.
Speaker 2: And then they go on and talk about joy and
Speaker 2: how happy they are about all of it. And I'm
Speaker 2: pretty ticked about it. And I think that came across
Speaker 2: from Donald Trump. But I got to say, as I
Speaker 2: was trying to be objective, I think, like, what will
Speaker 2: the independence think? And I think they looked at Kamala
Speaker 2: Harrison said, yeah, I don't like her, and I think
Speaker 2: they looked at Donald Trump and they didn't change their opinion.
Speaker 2: So that was my hope is that Donald Trump would
Speaker 2: come in like he did in twenty sixteen. Little unorthodox
Speaker 2: for sure, But what he really did in twenty sixteen
Speaker 2: is he made people like him. And in this one,
Speaker 2: you know, people that already loved Donald Trump loved Donald
Speaker 2: Trump last night. But I don't think anyone didn't already
Speaker 2: love Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Was one over One thing that I noticed is that,
Speaker 1: you know, I played some basketball in high school and college,
Speaker 1: and it was always difficult to go on an away
Speaker 1: game in which the crowds against you, the concessionaires are
Speaker 1: against you. The other team is against you, and the officials,
Speaker 1: the referees have been picked by the home team and
Speaker 1: paid by the home team, and you're the visitor. And
Speaker 1: in this case, David Muir and Lindsay Davis were absolutely
Speaker 1: in the bag in the pockets of the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: he was debating three on one. There were so many
Speaker 1: occasions last night when Kamala Harris either lied or misrepresented
Speaker 1: the truth. To be kind, instead of fact checking her
Speaker 1: in real time, every time they perceived Donald Trump make
Speaker 1: a misstatement, they jumped right up to explain that really
Speaker 1: crime is way down in this country. When that's a
Speaker 1: bunch of bs, crime is way up, enforcement of crime
Speaker 1: is way down. One issue is, of course Springfield, Ohio
Speaker 1: Clark County that used to be in your district. They
Speaker 1: moved a little bit and now you have parts of
Speaker 1: parts of Hamilton County. But you know what's happening there.
Speaker 1: And I have a nine to one one call that
Speaker 1: Tony Bender gave me in which Haitians are marching around
Speaker 1: Springfield with geese in their hands, or shall I say,
Speaker 1: have a bunch of gooses to be barbecued and put
Speaker 1: on a spigot, and it hides the real issue of
Speaker 1: twenty thousand illegals showing up in Springfield, Ohio and destroying
Speaker 1: public education, the school system. Students have been killed by
Speaker 1: Haitians and school buses. There's massive lawlessness. You can't go
Speaker 1: to the er. It's a total mess. And of course
Speaker 1: the Democrats want to make it a meme. And can
Speaker 1: you describe what's happening in Clark County in fact, what's
Speaker 1: happening in small town America, including Aurora, Colorado, where illegals
Speaker 1: have taken over apartment buildings, including in Portland and San
Speaker 1: Francisco where illegals have taken over blocks and run it
Speaker 1: like their Muslim enclaves in Paris, France. Can you explain
Speaker 1: what's happening not just in Springfield, but around America when
Speaker 1: it comes to illegals. And the memes really don't touch
Speaker 1: that whatsoever.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Look, people are paying attention finally, and maybe because
Speaker 2: of the memes, they've got their attention. You know, Springfield's
Speaker 2: about sixty thousand people, and if you brought it in
Speaker 2: twenty thousand Michigan fans to Springfield, Ohio, I mean it
Speaker 2: would be disruptive. It's a change. And let's say Haitians
Speaker 2: are a bit a bit more of a change than
Speaker 2: michigan fans or Californians or something. So you're flooding this
Speaker 2: community with a new surge of population. And look when
Speaker 2: you bring in a family and they're fruitful and multiply, well,
Speaker 2: I mean it takes the generation to raise the raise
Speaker 2: the kids. But when you bring in uh, you know,
Speaker 2: one refugee and lookte Haiti, they're legitimate problems in Haiti.
Speaker 1: They're great reasons to be leaving Haiti.
Speaker 2: And you know we're a place of refuge uh that
Speaker 2: many of them have come to lawfully. The Biden Harris
Speaker 2: administration has abused that grossly uh and and imported them.
Speaker 2: And the big thing here is why we need to
Speaker 2: change chain migration is once you bring one person in
Speaker 2: uh and let's say they're the best people. And initially
Speaker 2: a lot of the people came to spring to Ohio
Speaker 2: because the economy could grow faster if only they could
Speaker 2: find a workforce. And so people started bringing people in
Speaker 2: that wanted jobs for refugees and immigrants that come to
Speaker 2: America that want to find a place to work legally. Uh.
Speaker 2: You know, Western Ohio has been hiring we you know,
Speaker 2: we've been hindered largely by workforce constraints, and so that's
Speaker 2: how people started coming to Springfield, Ohio from Haiti uh
Speaker 2: and and then once they got there, you started bringing
Speaker 2: six people per refugee, and not all of them are
Speaker 2: quite as productive. And certainly, even if everything was going
Speaker 2: perfect at work in the free time, at night or
Speaker 2: in the morning or whatever hours of the day, you
Speaker 2: do have people reporting in the neighborhood. Pets are missing,
Speaker 2: people are concerned. Crime has gone up, and disease has
Speaker 2: been spread at a level that hasn't been experienced in
Speaker 2: in in Springfield, and we're seeing this in other communities
Speaker 2: as well. But you know, let's not say there's there's
Speaker 2: there's no truth. As ABC did it was pretty shameful.
Speaker 1: Well that is not reported. You're not going to have
Speaker 1: David Muir and Lindsay Davis talk about the increase of
Speaker 1: horrible diseases in Clark County, nor crime, nor the traffic problems.
Speaker 1: At eighteen years old, you can get a driver's license
Speaker 1: and there's accidents, there's rex the insurance rates or skyrocketing
Speaker 1: five hundred Haitians, yes, a thousand Haitians maybe, but not
Speaker 1: twenty thousand and last night, there was no implication whatsoever
Speaker 1: from Kamala Harris that the policy is going to change
Speaker 1: at all. In fact, she's going to double down on
Speaker 1: the policy. Despite the bad performances of Donald Trump at
Speaker 1: the debate. The policy problems remain this afternoon and tomorrow.
Speaker 1: And can you imagine her taking office in January the twentieth,
Speaker 1: and she's going to say, Look, that's what the American
Speaker 1: people want. We want fifteen to twenty million more illegals
Speaker 1: in the country, we want more chain migration. We want
Speaker 1: to continue to lie that crime is down while crime
Speaker 1: is up and enforcement is down. She's going to think
Speaker 1: her policies are what the American people want, and that's
Speaker 1: dangerous and as far to ever cover it, I don't
Speaker 1: think so.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, that's the one thing is that did
Speaker 2: the memes did sort of force the media to start
Speaker 2: talking about it, even if it was to continue spreading lies.
Speaker 2: And look, the federal government is doing nothing to help
Speaker 2: this community, and frankly, it'd be nice to see the
Speaker 2: state step up. And so I was encouraged the governor
Speaker 2: to Wine did do a press conference yesterday and did
Speaker 2: promise to do more because the schools are being overwhelmed.
Speaker 2: They're being told you got to put these Haitian refugees
Speaker 2: in class, and some of them there's reports that like
Speaker 2: nineteen and twenty year olds being enrolled as freshmen in
Speaker 2: high school. I mean, that doesn't make any sense. And
Speaker 2: your number of translators, some of these people don't speak
Speaker 2: a lick of English, and so how do you support that.
Speaker 2: And even in a workplace, I've had people reach out
Speaker 2: and say, hey, can you help us find some translators
Speaker 2: because we can't even update our work instructions for these
Speaker 2: people that do want to work. So you know, we
Speaker 2: need more resource to be able to do that. And
Speaker 2: Springfield's just being overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: It comes down to barbecuing a goose instead of what's
Speaker 1: happening to the fabric of small town America, including Aurora, Indiana.
Speaker 1: One thing that really was not focused upon the fact
Speaker 1: that Kamala Harris agreed with Joe Biden on the withdrawal
Speaker 1: from Afghanistan. You're a military guy, you went to West Point.
Speaker 1: Imagine her justifying they withdrawal from Afghanistan and blaming Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: which happened eight months after they took office, and everyone
Speaker 1: in the defense industry, the Secretary of Defense, all the
Speaker 1: generals said, don't do that, McKenzie, etc. Lloyd Austin said
Speaker 1: don't do that. Millie said, don't do that, and they
Speaker 1: did it anyway. And then Kamala Harris last night stands
Speaker 1: up and defends that and even that the Sharper point
Speaker 1: was not no one fact checked her on the sum
Speaker 1: of the lies you told about Afghanistan and the poll
Speaker 1: out blaming Donald Trump for their decision. Your comments on Afghanistan.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean it's a disaster. I mean here twenty
Speaker 2: three years after nine to eleven. You know, on that
Speaker 2: day we would have not thought we would go this
Speaker 2: long with no other major terrorist attacks in our country.
Speaker 2: So that's a great testament to the vigilance that many
Speaker 2: people have given to our country, the sacrifices, and look
Speaker 2: in Afghanistan, it's particularly hard because people stayed there without
Speaker 2: the kind of focus and sharpness that we needed for
Speaker 2: a long time. There's still been no accountable ability. But
Speaker 2: I thought Donald Trump really made that point is he
Speaker 2: did fire people, he did hold people accountable, and the
Speaker 2: Biden administration has held no one accountable for the disaster there.
Speaker 2: I mean, you don't have to have served in the military,
Speaker 2: you know, like I did, to know that you get
Speaker 2: the civilians out before you get the military out. They
Speaker 2: did it the other way. No one believes that Donald
Speaker 2: Trump would have done that. No one believes Mike Pompeo
Speaker 2: as Secretary of State would have surrendered the seat of
Speaker 2: the Taliban and left them in charge of security at
Speaker 2: the airfield. So the idea of whether to leave Afghanistan
Speaker 2: or not, you know, Trump did make a commitment to
Speaker 2: leave Afghanistan, but he did say, look, we made it
Speaker 2: conditions base, and he made it very clear how credible
Speaker 2: of a threat he had made to the leadership of
Speaker 2: the Taliban that this will succeed or we won't leave.
Speaker 2: And so, you know, it's a shame that Trump wasn't
Speaker 2: able to continue to execute that. I think we would
Speaker 2: have been able to see a really different outcome. And
Speaker 2: as I talked to gold Star families who lost, you know,
Speaker 2: the most precious gift of life. You don't really understand
Speaker 2: until you're a parent, you hold your first baby, how
Speaker 2: precious life really is. This is what these people sacrificed,
Speaker 2: and they've largely been shown nothing but contempt by Joe
Speaker 2: Biden and Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: Representative Warren Davidson. A few weeks ago, Joe Biden said
Speaker 1: that no American soldier had died on his watch. His
Speaker 1: mind didn't operate to understand that thirteen died were murdered
Speaker 1: at Abbey's Gate. And as I speak now this Wednesday afternoon,
Speaker 1: there's about twelve million females women in Afghanistan that when
Speaker 1: they go into public, which they can't do very often,
Speaker 1: they cannot make a sound, they cannot speak, they cannot murmur,
Speaker 1: they cannot sing, they can't do anything in Afghanistan. And
Speaker 1: that's the condition of women that Kamala Harris left Afghanistan in,
Speaker 1: which is totally disgusting. And of course the mutilation of
Speaker 1: genitals in Afghanistan of girls and women continue unabated, and
Speaker 1: that also is something completely ignored, acting as if it
Speaker 1: was a victory the way they left Afghanistan. Look what's
Speaker 1: happening now. And for those who are concerned about women's rights,
Speaker 1: and I'm concerned about women's rights, Heck, my wife is
Speaker 1: a woman, my mother was a woman, my granddaughter is
Speaker 1: a woman, my sister is a woman, and I'm very
Speaker 1: concerned about the policies of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris left
Speaker 1: that country living in barbaric times for the women, and
Speaker 1: that for the last couple of years of the Trump administration,
Speaker 1: things are under control completely. So lastly, you're in the Congress,
Speaker 1: is there a sense that the debate is measurably important
Speaker 1: or is there a sense that in the weeks in
Speaker 1: two months that remained things are going to subside back
Speaker 1: to where they are because the policies haven't changed and
Speaker 1: the issues haven't changed. And I know that when you
Speaker 1: play an away game in basketball or football, when the
Speaker 1: other team picks the referees, you're not going to be
Speaker 1: traded fairly. And that doesn't excuse some of the performances
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump. So give me the sense of the
Speaker 1: House of Representatives this afternoon.
Speaker 2: Well, look, you know, when when opposing teams come into
Speaker 2: the pit at elder you know they're facing a tough crowd,
Speaker 2: and but they at least have honest refs. And if
Speaker 2: you look at if you look at the debate last night.
Speaker 1: They didn't have anything.
Speaker 2: It was a rig thing. We knew that. That's the
Speaker 2: way it is. When Donald Trump goes before the controlled
Speaker 2: media and you know, I thought you did well there,
Speaker 2: but look if you if you look at the debate,
Speaker 2: I don't think anyone's mind has changed. No, Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: didn't come off as some charming, lovable person and went
Speaker 2: over new people. And the big thing though, that she
Speaker 2: didn't get done no fact checks. Like one of the
Speaker 2: lies she told was we have no American troops deployed
Speaker 2: in combat around the world. Ever, so yeah we do,
Speaker 2: and in the Middle East into sea on the ground
Speaker 2: and at sea in the Middle East, so we're being
Speaker 2: rocket attacks from the hooties all the time there, and
Speaker 2: and they don't have clarity from the administration on how
Speaker 2: what exactly is the mission on the ground, and so
Speaker 2: it was a very dishonest statement and none of it
Speaker 2: was fact checked by uh the controlled media. So I think,
Speaker 2: look the debate, Kamala Harris already wants to do another one.
Speaker 2: I think, look, Trump team should really take a consideration
Speaker 2: on that, because here's the thing. You should take every
Speaker 2: chance you can on any campaign in my view, and look,
Speaker 2: this is a little bit like yes, one of these
Speaker 2: ESPN commentators, I can't necessarily take that shot or draw
Speaker 2: that crowd that Donald Trump does, so I can tell
Speaker 2: you what needs to happen is he's going to win
Speaker 2: over more people. So he's going to make people that
Speaker 2: don't like him yet like him. And if he's got
Speaker 2: a chance to do that, I hope he takes it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no question, Congressman, Thank you very much. Big news
Speaker 1: on sann In this morning was the Swifties. The Swifties
Speaker 1: are now with Kamala Harris. Big news there, but yeah,
Speaker 1: what a shot, what a show. News Representative Warren Davidson.
Speaker 1: You're a great American and American patriot for serving our
Speaker 1: nation and thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Congressman, Thank you. Gah bless you and all
Speaker 2: your listeners.
Speaker 1: God bless America. Let's continue with more your comments of
Speaker 1: any five win three, seven, four, nine, seven thousand. Bill
Speaker 1: cunning Him the Great American Live Age, home of the
Speaker 1: Reds and the home of the station that loves the
Speaker 1: United States of America. News Radio seven hundred WLW. Now
Speaker 1: Billy cunning Him, the Great American. We scheduled after one
Speaker 1: o'clock today, Senator Ran Paul to be here from the
Speaker 1: great state of Kentucky, my home state were always born
Speaker 1: and talk about the great debate last night, deficits is
Speaker 1: so much more you know to I've been a Trump
Speaker 1: supporter for the last ten years, since he came down
Speaker 1: the escalator in twenty fifteen, because he represents America's last
Speaker 1: best hope to stop the fundamental transformation of our country
Speaker 1: to something undescribed. But I know it's left wing. I
Speaker 1: know it's a liberal, progressive and Marxist. That's what I know.
Speaker 1: I know what's coming with Kamala Harris, and a bad
Speaker 1: debate performance by Donald Trump does not mean that the
Speaker 1: policies that Kamala Harris are good. Would you agree if
Speaker 1: you would have put me or Sean Hannity or you
Speaker 1: up on the debate stage. Whenever she brought up issues
Speaker 1: of race, I would have threw it back in the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party's face by saying, you're the party of DEI
Speaker 1: and affirmative action that are subtracting, adding, multiplying, dividing by
Speaker 1: race and race alone. You're that party. When she would
Speaker 1: have brought up the so called Central Park five, I
Speaker 1: would have said, this is not what happened forty or
Speaker 1: fifty years ago. This is what you're doing in the
Speaker 1: American economy today. Then rout off the facts about food,
Speaker 1: about energy, about housing, about insurance cost, about rents, and
Speaker 1: then just whatever she says, and your ire gets up.
Speaker 1: It's time to turn the page and reflect back to her,
Speaker 1: and don't talk about rabbits or cats or dogs. Even
Speaker 1: though there's a nine to one one call running around
Speaker 1: August twenty sixth Clark County resident calling about Haitians killing geese,
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's real. I think it is,
Speaker 1: but I'm not sure. But so what the issue is
Speaker 1: twenty thousand Haitians dropped in a small town America, without
Speaker 1: the schools, without the apartment buildings, about the medical without
Speaker 1: the pharmaceutical without the drug stores, without the police force
Speaker 1: able to handle it. That's the issue. Every time that's
Speaker 1: brought up, turn it back on her. As you know,
Speaker 1: you're listening to a moot court winner in law school.
Speaker 1: I know how to turn the issue back and change it,
Speaker 1: which Kamala Harris did very effectively. The first question that
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris was are you better off today than you
Speaker 1: were four years ago? Of course the answer is no. Well,
Speaker 1: for seventy percent of us say we're not better off.
Speaker 1: But instead of answering the questions, She went off on
Speaker 1: a tangent about living in a middle class lifestyle when
Speaker 1: in fact, in Canada, where she spent most of her youth,
Speaker 1: she was living in an opulent, rich section of town
Speaker 1: because both of her parents were highly educated. But all
Speaker 1: that is true because Kamala Harris, many say, won the
Speaker 1: debate does not mean her policies are right. Would you agree?
Speaker 1: And going into it that Donald knew about the proclivities
Speaker 1: of David Mure and Lindsey Davis. In fact, I shared
Speaker 1: with you I got a guess maybe coming up later,
Speaker 1: going to try to get hold of them again, coming
Speaker 1: up later that Between her announcement as a candidate and now,
Speaker 1: there's been one hundred stories about her on the ABC
Speaker 1: Nightly News. One hundred stories. What percent of those stories
Speaker 1: have been positive about Kamala Harris. The answer is one
Speaker 1: hundred percent. The only coverage by ABC News about Kamala
Speaker 1: Hahreas is positive, and ninety three percent of the coverage
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump is negative. You can't change that. In fact,
Speaker 1: NBC is like eighty seven percent and CBS is like
Speaker 1: seventy four percent. It's all positive for Kamala Harris. She's
Speaker 1: never been called a liberal, a progressive San Francisco liberal.
Speaker 1: None of that's ever brought up. It's ignored. And as
Speaker 1: far as the Swifties are concerned, I know segment Dennison
Speaker 1: is a great fan of Taylor swift Do you think
Speaker 1: Taylor Swifties. You think the Swifties know about carried interest
Speaker 1: or taxing, unrealized gains or capital gains increased. They have
Speaker 1: no idea. And so when a Democrat, especially a person
Speaker 1: of color, female, runs the tsunami, and it is left
Speaker 1: to right, top to bottom, a tsunami of Democrats come
Speaker 1: at you from the colleges, universities, latent on TV, the
Speaker 1: View evening newscast. They're all against you, big city newspapers,
Speaker 1: they're all against the labor unions, all against you. It's tough.
Speaker 1: And you got to know going in and the Trump's
Speaker 1: the new going in, he was gonna he's playing an
Speaker 1: away game in which the home team picked all the
Speaker 1: referees largely it was three against one. And of course
Speaker 1: he did reference the fact that Dana Walden, close friend
Speaker 1: of Kamala Harris, who runs Disney owned ABC News and
Speaker 1: the Moderators, is a close personal friend of Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: And so it's kind of ridiculous that ABC News was
Speaker 1: allowed to be picked by Donald Trump because of their
Speaker 1: proclivities in favor of Kamala Harris. Especially, employees tend to
Speaker 1: do what the uh employer tells you to do, and
Speaker 1: that certainly happened here. He knew going in that David
Speaker 1: Muir and Lindsay Davis had only run positive stories, not
Speaker 1: one negative story about Kamala Harris, and all the stories
Speaker 1: about Trump are always bad, always negative. And also he
Speaker 1: knew going in that the bosses at ABC News were
Speaker 1: close personal friends of Kamala Harris. In fact, miss O
Speaker 1: Walden was the person who Kamala Harris credits with setting
Speaker 1: her up on a date with her husband, now Doug Emof,
Speaker 1: who was a big time lawyer in California. So they
Speaker 1: have a personal relationship, which is fine. Now, having said
Speaker 1: that Trump knew, I'm certain that he knew he was
Speaker 1: going to face questioning that would be one sided and
Speaker 1: pointed against him and favor Kamala Harris. The fact checking
Speaker 1: was six times fact checking Donald Trump, but at no
Speaker 1: point did the so called moderators fact check Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: On number one, the very fine people hoax in Charlottesville.
Speaker 1: He did not say that in context. He meant that
Speaker 1: those who favored the statues being up and those who
Speaker 1: favored the Confederates statues coming down the fine people on
Speaker 1: both sides of it. Didn't fact check her on the
Speaker 1: twenty five hoax, didn't say that. He should have said,
Speaker 1: Miss Vice President Donald Trump has rejected that and Putin
Speaker 1: can do whatever the hell he wants. That's not true.
Speaker 1: Dictator on day one. That's not true. Blaming botched Afghan
Speaker 1: pull out on Donald Trump. That's not true. Tariffs being taxes,
Speaker 1: that's not true. A bloodbath hoax. He said there'd be
Speaker 1: a bloodbath in the automobile industry if Kamala Harris wins.
Speaker 1: Not in America. Another lie, the abortion monitor hoax not
Speaker 1: fact checked. Central Park five execution. That was a hoax.
Speaker 1: Suckers and losers in the military, that was a hoax.
Speaker 1: That was a lie. False fracking claims. That was a lie,
Speaker 1: false oil production claims. That was a lie. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: thousand manufacturing jobs that was a lie. Distorting unemployment numbers,
Speaker 1: that was a lie. Her saying I was raised in
Speaker 1: the middle class. That was a lie. Sold us out
Speaker 1: to China. That was a lie. Terminating the Constitution by
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris. That was a lie. Not one troop in
Speaker 1: any war zone, that was a lie. She knew or
Speaker 1: should have known that a rock and Syria today, as
Speaker 1: I speak this afternoon, soldiers American soldiers who are at
Speaker 1: a frequent attack by Irani and banked malicious and in fact,
Speaker 1: over the three months ago, four or five were killed
Speaker 1: by artillery shells and they're still there. She lied, lied, lied,
Speaker 1: taking guns away, She lied. And not one time, not
Speaker 1: one time, did the moderators David murraor Lindsay Davis fact
Speaker 1: checked her in real time. Because they worked for ABC News,
Speaker 1: and those who run ABC News want Kamala Harris to
Speaker 1: be elected, they'll give them easy access to the president
Speaker 1: and the person. The woman that runs ABC News is
Speaker 1: a close personal friend of Kamala Harris and Doug em Off,
Speaker 1: which is fine. But Trump knew all that going in.
Speaker 1: He knew who was playing an away game with officials
Speaker 1: and referees selected by the home team, and that he
Speaker 1: was going to have a terrible time with the moderator
Speaker 1: and with Kamala Harris. He knew that. Having known that,
Speaker 1: Trump did a bad job debating. Kamala Harris did a
Speaker 1: better job. That doesn't change the fact that the problems
Speaker 1: this afternoon are justice profound as they were yesterday or
Speaker 1: the day before or the day after tomorrow. So by
Speaker 1: the media is now conditioning us to believe that Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris won the debate, therefore her policies are correct. Do
Speaker 1: you buy that? But I have this other story from Reuters,
Speaker 1: and I'm like a normal American. I think you are too.
Speaker 1: You probably if you listen to talk radio. You're involved
Speaker 1: in issues. You know what I talk about when I
Speaker 1: talk about unrealized gains or carried interest, that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: You know about capital gains. You know the fact that
Speaker 1: corporate taxes are not paid by companies. They're paid by
Speaker 1: the consumer. When the cost of goods or services go up,
Speaker 1: employers and companies passed that additional call onto you as
Speaker 1: a consumer and the form of higher prices. If it's
Speaker 1: more expensive to produce a product or service, the cost
Speaker 1: goes up, that's called inflation, and you pay more. Companies pay,
Speaker 1: in essence, no taxes at all. The consumer pays everything.
Speaker 1: So Reuters had one of these dials. They had ten
Speaker 1: uncommitted voters. And they were three in Michigan, three in Wisconsin,
Speaker 1: four in Pennsylvania. And they had the ten uncommitted voters,
Speaker 1: and they were all separate from each other, so they
Speaker 1: weren't influencing each other with these so called dials. And
Speaker 1: six of them shifted toward supporting Donald Trump, and of
Speaker 1: course this is shocking. Three leaned toward hairs. One remains
Speaker 1: uncertain that's a solid outcome for Donald Trump. So to
Speaker 1: Americans who are not on the websites, listening to talk radio,
Speaker 1: watching the newscast, reading articles in periodicals, do they see
Speaker 1: things that you and I don't see? Is that possible?
Speaker 1: I think the answer is hell, yes, it's possible. So,
Speaker 1: once again, ten undecided voters in three different states, unconnected
Speaker 1: to each other. After the debate, six of them shifted
Speaker 1: toward Trump. Five said they found Kamala Harris was vague
Speaker 1: during the ninety minute debate, and they wanted to know,
Speaker 1: since she's in power right now, why should she cause
Speaker 1: the changes she's advocating. I'm thinking, is it possible that
Speaker 1: the Great American is wrong? Is it possible that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump won the debate? According to this article, the answer
Speaker 1: just isn't yes. The answer is hell yes. And having
Speaker 1: said that, when I've gotten fifteen to twenty calls this morning,
Speaker 1: I did two interviews this morning on other radio stations.
Speaker 1: And there's a sense that because Kamala Harris won the debate,
Speaker 1: as perceived by some, that she's going to win the election. Well,
Speaker 1: how about this one. There were three debates with Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen. After the first debate,
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton got a one point bump. After the second debate,
Speaker 1: she got a four point bump. After the third debate Clinton,
Speaker 1: she got a total of a six point bump up.
Speaker 1: And who won the election in twenty sixteen? Was it
Speaker 1: the person who won the debates? No, Donald Trump won
Speaker 1: the debates because people want to change. They didn't want
Speaker 1: to go through eight more years of the policies of
Speaker 1: Barack Hussein Obama, and it was perceived that the policies
Speaker 1: of Obama would be continued by Hillary Clinton. So even
Speaker 1: though Clinton won all three debates, Donald Trump won the election.
Speaker 1: Is there a sense today, much like in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: that we want to change? The answer is yes. The
Speaker 1: great majority of the American peer people say we're going
Speaker 1: in the wrong direction. And the fact that a good
Speaker 1: moot quarter one the debate doesn't mean her policies are right.
Speaker 1: I could argue either side of a case and makes
Speaker 1: sense either way. And if I was there on stage,
Speaker 1: I would turn every attack against me against her and
Speaker 1: not talk about geese and goose and dogs and cats
Speaker 1: and rabbit holes and the Central Park five and how
Speaker 1: big is my car? How big is my crowd? My
Speaker 1: crowd's bigger than your crowd. I wouldn't have answered any
Speaker 1: of the questions. I would turn everyone back to her
Speaker 1: and let her answer the question. So, but this is
Speaker 1: not an election about who's the better debate. This is
Speaker 1: an election about policies. Policies of Kamala Harris, about open
Speaker 1: border policies, about sanctuary city policies of hers, about reparations Hers,
Speaker 1: about price controls Hers about no cash bonds for Fish's
Speaker 1: criminal her. About the EVY mandate, that's her, But DEI
Speaker 1: mandatory training that's her. About stopping energy production that's her.
Speaker 1: About a strong military week that's her. Abortion on demand
Speaker 1: through birth that's her. The cost of groceries, limiting private insurance,
Speaker 1: the border wall, that's all on her side of the table.
Speaker 1: Listen up, according to some she won the debate. Does
Speaker 1: that change and make worthy the substance of her policies?
Speaker 1: Does that mean her policies are right because she allegedly
Speaker 1: won the debate, except by Reuters, who said Trump won
Speaker 1: the debate. Let's continue. Can you smell when I'm cooking?
Speaker 1: Last not about ten forty five, I was depressed. I
Speaker 1: had projectile vomiting and diarrhea. My heads was exploding and
Speaker 1: my ear wax was coming out in droves. And I thought,
Speaker 1: this is the end of humanity as we know it,
Speaker 1: because I know what's coming, fundamental transforming of this country.
Speaker 1: Talk to Springfield, Ohio about how they like the transformation
Speaker 1: of their little city. The policies are wrong. Schedule up.
Speaker 1: Senator Ran Paul is next a News Radio seven hundred
Speaker 1: WW Billy Cunningham the Great America, of course, the junior
Speaker 1: Senator soon the senior Senator from the state of Kentucky
Speaker 1: in my home state is Ran Paul and Ran Paul
Speaker 1: Welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. And first of all,
Speaker 1: I love your comments on Squakbox and elsewhere about the deficits.
Speaker 1: The most predictable financial crisis ever hit any Country's going
Speaker 1: to be America in the next few years, before we
Speaker 1: get to the Rains Act, before we get to the
Speaker 1: crisis sixpenny plan. Tell me your reaction. The news of
Speaker 1: the day, of course, is the great debate between Kamala
Speaker 1: and Donald Trump. Who won, who lost, and where do
Speaker 1: we go from here?
Speaker 3: Their presidential debates are a unique bear. They are targeted
Speaker 3: mostly towards the people in the middle. You know, about
Speaker 3: forty forty five percent of America are Republicans forty forty
Speaker 3: five percent or Democrats, and there's ten or fifteen, maybe
Speaker 3: twenty percent in the middle. And so when you're doing
Speaker 3: these debates, you I had to try to attract those
Speaker 3: people in the middle, and you kind of wonder who
Speaker 3: these people are. And I tell people to imagine going
Speaker 3: to a dinner party and somebody comes to your dinner
Speaker 3: party and they say out come, but only if you
Speaker 3: don't talk about religion or politics, and nobody raises their voice.
Speaker 3: And that's who the Independence are. And so Donald Trump
Speaker 3: has to struggle a little bit because of his larger
Speaker 3: than life personality that sometimes the Independence think he's too
Speaker 3: pombastic if they hear his policies, I think he can win.
Speaker 3: I think in some ways it was a draw. You know,
Speaker 3: last night, I think sometimes he took debate too much.
Speaker 3: But I do think that when you compare the policies
Speaker 3: between what Trump is presenting. You know, Trump passed, along
Speaker 3: with our health Republican Congress, a large tax cut which
Speaker 3: caused a booming economy and some of the lowest unemployment
Speaker 3: ever recorded. We didn't hear enough of that. We didn't
Speaker 3: hear enough of the ensuing inflation that we got from
Speaker 3: the Biden administration. You know, we have most average American
Speaker 3: working families have less money to go on vacation, less
Speaker 3: money for gas groceries. People are actually in the meet
Speaker 3: out trying to decide what meat they can they can afford.
Speaker 3: And that's all because of Biden spending and borrowing so
Speaker 3: much and creating this inflation. I don't think we've heard
Speaker 3: enough of that in the debate. I think if we
Speaker 3: hear more policy wins, But if we get stuck in
Speaker 3: the run of how big the crowds are, sometimes that's
Speaker 3: just not a winning, winning approach.
Speaker 1: Senator on that front, I'm holding a story here from Reuters,
Speaker 1: and I agree with you. When it was done about
Speaker 1: ten forty five or not. I had a feeling in
Speaker 1: the pit of my stomach that wasn't good. I said,
Speaker 1: this isn't good. But then I didn't go to sleep
Speaker 1: till like three or four o'clock in the morning. Finally
Speaker 1: got a couple hours rest. I woke up and I said, now,
Speaker 1: wait a minute. She may have won the debate, but
Speaker 1: her policies are the same. We're in the same position
Speaker 1: we were in before. I'm looking at the story out
Speaker 1: of Reuters and Reuters identified and interviewed in researched ten
Speaker 1: undecided voters, three in Wisconsin, three in Michigan, four in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: and they were all connected to each other so it
Speaker 1: would be more legitimate. And at the end of the
Speaker 1: debate they had to say who won the debate. Six
Speaker 1: of these undecided voters shifted towards supporting Trump, three leaned
Speaker 1: toward Harris, one remains undecided, and a small sampling they said, basically, well,
Speaker 1: she's in power now, why can't she do what she's
Speaker 1: already saying in the future. Why hadn't she done it yet?
Speaker 1: And they also said her facial gestures didn't look presidential.
Speaker 1: She looked a little according to some woman, looked a
Speaker 1: little goofy And so is it possible that those of
Speaker 1: us in politics who live and diet see it through
Speaker 1: a different lens than someone who is undecided, who's not
Speaker 1: clear who's running for president. I was with a dentist
Speaker 1: about two nights ago, and she's very bright, intelligent, smart,
Speaker 1: And she asked me, is the debate this week or next?
Speaker 1: Is Kamala Harris still running or is it Biden? And
Speaker 1: this is a smart person who doesn't watch the news,
Speaker 1: doesn't care about politics, thinks she's going to vote for Trump.
Speaker 1: So is it possible that we in the field see
Speaker 1: things that the undecided voters don't see?
Speaker 3: Yeah, because a lot of people are going to make
Speaker 3: their decision not necessarily on a debate, but on their
Speaker 3: own personal circumstances. So if you make sixty thousand dollars
Speaker 3: a year, or you and your wife make that as
Speaker 3: a combined income, and it's only buying fifty eight thousand
Speaker 3: dollars worth of stuff because you're losing two thousand dollars
Speaker 3: to inflation, you see that every day they know whether
Speaker 3: they could go on vacation this year, whether they can
Speaker 3: drive across state lines or go to a park, or
Speaker 3: do the vacation they'd like to do, whether they can
Speaker 3: afford what they want to buy in the grocery store.
Speaker 3: So that is an economic reality they can't escape. But
Speaker 3: elections do come down to, you know, sort of Santa
Speaker 3: Claus versus the American dream. The American dreams want of opportunity.
Speaker 3: It's not necessarily concrete, but it's it's freedom and the
Speaker 3: opportunity to strive, to learn and succeed and to prosper.
Speaker 3: Santa Claus is someone who just offers you free stuff,
Speaker 3: and they pander to you, and they say, hey, here's
Speaker 3: twenty five thousand dollars for a house. There's some people
Speaker 3: will jump to that and say, I can't get a
Speaker 3: house and no bank will give me the money, and
Speaker 3: I don't have twenty five thousand dollars. So I'd love
Speaker 3: to have Santa Claus giving me twenty five thousand dollars.
Speaker 3: But there's also are there enough thinking people who will
Speaker 3: think of the repercussions of putting up twenty five thousand
Speaker 3: dollars that isn't real, giving it to people, and then
Speaker 3: causing more price inflation. Maybe the house actually goes up
Speaker 3: twenty five thousand dollars more because you've stimulated an artificial
Speaker 3: demand with fake money. So I think there are enough
Speaker 3: voters out there. So we have to make the debate
Speaker 3: over who is going to lead the country and which
Speaker 3: party will lead the country on policy, and you know
Speaker 3: that we've got to come and get beyond certain impediments
Speaker 3: that for people who don't like Donald Trump. He has
Speaker 3: to get beyond that to the policy. And I think
Speaker 3: it could have been better last night, but he still
Speaker 3: has every opportunity and long enough to make sure people
Speaker 3: can get that message.
Speaker 1: Your father was excellent on this issue. I had your
Speaker 1: dad on several times. I've had you on a few
Speaker 1: times about the deficit. And it's out there. It's a
Speaker 1: looming giant. It's terrible. It's almost like an asteroid that
Speaker 1: we know it's coming. I can tell you when it's
Speaker 1: going to hit within five years. But when it hits,
Speaker 1: it's going to destroy humanity as we know it. Right now,
Speaker 1: it's thirty six trillion. We're going up the rate about
Speaker 1: a trillion every one hundred day. He's going to add
Speaker 1: two trillion this year to the national debt, and as
Speaker 1: far as the eye can see it, it'll be a
Speaker 1: fifty trillion dollars by twenty thirty two fifty trillion dollars.
Speaker 1: And when I watched you with Joe Kernan and Becky
Speaker 1: the other day on squawk Box, you talked about what
Speaker 1: will happen when the world quits buying our debt or
Speaker 1: the dollar is not the reserve currency. There's an unbelievable
Speaker 1: crisis coming. Can you explain that to the American people?
Speaker 3: Know, we spend about six trillion, we bring in about
Speaker 3: four trillion, so we're gonna have a two trillion dollar debt.
Speaker 3: That debt we sell, we pay for it with the
Speaker 3: Treasury bond. Somebody buys them. The public buy is about
Speaker 3: a third of those, foreign comftry by about a third,
Speaker 3: and the Fed buys a third. When the Fed buys
Speaker 3: the debt, they do it by just printing up money,
Speaker 3: so that causes inflation. But if there's a loss of confidence,
Speaker 3: it doesn't always come gradually. It might happen tomorrow, it
Speaker 3: might happen next week, it might not happen for five years,
Speaker 3: but there can come a time where there's a cataclysmic
Speaker 3: loss of faith. Realize that even in Europe, as bad
Speaker 3: as they are in Europe, over half of the countries
Speaker 3: in the European Union balance their budget on an annual basis.
Speaker 3: Most of them have high taxes, but they don't go
Speaker 3: into debt for their Social Security and their Medicare programs.
Speaker 3: Most of them have the age increasing for all these
Speaker 3: programs based on longevity. We don't do any of that,
Speaker 3: and we've got real problems. It's going to hit the
Speaker 3: fan at some point in time. My hope is that
Speaker 3: we wake up and realize this and try to slow
Speaker 3: down the accumulation of debt before we get to a catastrophe.
Speaker 3: But I fear that both parties are ignorant of this
Speaker 3: and terrible with the spending. I mean, administration added eight
Speaker 3: trillion in debt. The Biden administration is gonna add eight
Speaker 3: trillion in debt. So there really has not been a
Speaker 3: lot of difference between the addition of debt between Republicans
Speaker 3: and Democrats. And that's the sorry truth.
Speaker 1: From George Washington in seventeen eighty nine to George Bush
Speaker 1: and twenty oh one, think of the economic military difficulties
Speaker 1: America had Between George Washington and Bush forty three, we
Speaker 1: went through Hell's half Acre, Great Glory One Wars. The
Speaker 1: total accumulated national debt in twenty oh one was about
Speaker 1: four and a half trillion dollars. We add twice as
Speaker 1: much of that. We had that same number every two
Speaker 1: years now, so seventeen eighty nine, the two thousand and
Speaker 1: one was about four trillion. We now add that same
Speaker 1: amount four trillion every two years. How's that sustainable?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 1: You know, the George W.
Speaker 3: Bush doubled the national debt from right just a little
Speaker 3: under under five to ten. Obama doubled it from ten
Speaker 3: to twenty, and now it's going up at an even
Speaker 3: faster pace. During COVID, when we made a terrible decision
Speaker 3: to close the economy down and pass out pre checks
Speaker 3: to everybody, the deficit exploded like it's never done before.
Speaker 3: So you know, I've offered for years a penny plan
Speaker 3: cut one percent across the board to balance the budget,
Speaker 3: but it no longer works. It now has to be
Speaker 3: called the sixpenny plan to it'd be a six percent
Speaker 3: cut for five years, would balance the budget. But I
Speaker 3: actually will get a vote on this in the next
Speaker 3: two weeks. I will force them to vote on it.
Speaker 3: Right now, there is no budget. There's been no vote
Speaker 3: on a budget Republicans didn't produce one in the House,
Speaker 3: Democrats didn't produce one in the Senate. There has been
Speaker 3: no vote on a budget. So we're spending six trillion
Speaker 3: dollars with no budget plan. And this is outrageous. No
Speaker 3: corporation would go through a year, you know, a billion
Speaker 3: dollar corporation wouldn't go through a year without a spending plan.
Speaker 3: But I'm going to force them to vote online, and
Speaker 3: it'll be the sixpenny plan. We'll cut six percent a
Speaker 3: year each year for five years, balances in the fifth year.
Speaker 3: And my guess is I'll get somewhere between about sixteen
Speaker 3: and twenty five Republicans, about maybe half the Republicans if
Speaker 3: I'm lucky, no Democrats, and then half the Republicans will
Speaker 3: vote with the Democrats against my budget. But at least
Speaker 3: somebody will put forward something, put something on paper and
Speaker 3: force them to vote.
Speaker 1: We have about two minutes remaining. In a concrete way,
Speaker 1: what happens when the world quit spying our debt or
Speaker 1: the dollar is not a reserve currency. What happens? How
Speaker 1: does the crisis manifest itself?
Speaker 3: Well, this is the question, and the question is whether
Speaker 3: it's a gradual crisis and it looms over weeks and months,
Speaker 3: or whether it happens in one day. This is a
Speaker 3: scary thing about it. If you look back at the
Speaker 3: calamities of the last one hundred years, most of the
Speaker 3: stock market calamity is unfolded in a period of twenty
Speaker 3: four hours. So we sell our debt periodically, and when
Speaker 3: they go to have this auction of our debt, people
Speaker 3: show up buy it. There could be a catastrophic day
Speaker 3: when nobody shows up and people just say we have
Speaker 3: lost confidence. What will happen on that day is a
Speaker 3: feddle by one hundred percent of it. But what it
Speaker 3: happened is to get any of the private marketplace to
Speaker 3: buy it again, they have to raise the interest rates.
Speaker 3: And you know, we had a significant crisis like this
Speaker 3: with when in nineteen eighty when Volker raises interest rates
Speaker 3: all the way to nineteen percent. Part of that is
Speaker 3: to get people to buy the debt. But also realized
Speaker 3: is that we have so much debt, is thirty five
Speaker 3: tillion dollars debt that the interest payment we've been doing
Speaker 3: was under two percent, and we were keeping you know,
Speaker 3: we were doubling the debt and actually staying with the
Speaker 3: same interest payment, but now the interest rates just begin
Speaker 3: to rise. They're paying a little over three percent on
Speaker 3: the debt, but our interest payment's over eight hundred billion now,
Speaker 3: it's about equal to the military spending. It's becoming the
Speaker 3: number one item in our budget. So I don't know
Speaker 3: whether it's a gradual or abrupt ind but there are
Speaker 3: people who talk about a black swan. One can be
Speaker 3: in the stock market, can be an abrupt loss of confidence,
Speaker 3: but it could also be in the in the marketplace
Speaker 3: for the dollar, because the dollar really isn't backed by
Speaker 3: anything anymore. At one time it had a link to gold,
Speaker 3: but with no link. It's the full faith and credit
Speaker 3: of the United States, and the people believe in the
Speaker 3: taxing power, and we've destroyed our currency at a slower
Speaker 3: pace than say Argentina or some of these other countries.
Speaker 3: But you know, there are other things that people can
Speaker 3: go to now. You know, there's a story in the
Speaker 3: Wall Street journalis thatday about tether, which is a stable coin.
Speaker 3: It's a cryptocurrency back to one to one with dollars,
Speaker 3: and the extraordinary amount of commerce going through that now.
Speaker 3: And the question is, one day will people bail out,
Speaker 3: not just for gold. But will they bail out for
Speaker 3: a cryptocurrency that is backed one to one with some
Speaker 3: kind of hard asset in the stocks or with gold.
Speaker 1: Well, in today's world, things don't happen slowly. I would
Speaker 1: anticipate almost a nineteen eighty seven crash, and within one
Speaker 1: or two days there'll be a precipitating factor and the
Speaker 1: world's going to figure out we can't repay our debt.
Speaker 1: We have no chance that we're paying the principle and
Speaker 1: the interest rates must continue to skyrocket to federal by
Speaker 1: most of the debt print more money, which means every
Speaker 1: dollar you got is worth less. Lastly, the fourth branch
Speaker 1: of government, some say the most powerful branch is the
Speaker 1: regulatory branch. All the three letter capital letters. You have
Speaker 1: something called the Rains Act. Can you give us an
Speaker 1: update on what that is and what it seeks to do?
Speaker 3: This would transform the regulatory environment in our country. Regulations
Speaker 3: are killing business and have any huge cost to the economy,
Speaker 3: costs US millions of dollars in jobs and millions of
Speaker 3: dollars in prosperity. The Rains Act would say that any
Speaker 3: agency that creates a regulation that is a major regulation
Speaker 3: that will cost the economy over one hundred million dollars.
Speaker 3: They can't just write it without the approval of Congress.
Speaker 3: It would have to come back and be voted on
Speaker 3: by Congress. Unfortunately, only Republicans support this concept that no
Speaker 3: Democrats on the bill. We're forced to vote on occasion
Speaker 3: and never gotten a Democrat to support it. But this
Speaker 3: is a great distinction when people trying to think who
Speaker 3: they want to vote for. There are no Democrats that
Speaker 3: are for reveealing any regulations. Just the truth of the matter,
Speaker 3: There are no Democrats that are for reducing any taxes.
Speaker 3: There are only Democrats out there that will say we
Speaker 3: need increased taxes on the rich. The truth of the
Speaker 3: matter is the rich pay all the taxes already. The
Speaker 3: top one percent of wage earners pay almost half of
Speaker 3: the income tax. The top ten percent of wage jarners
Speaker 3: pay ninety percent over ninety percent of the income tax.
Speaker 3: But there are distinct differences. The Rains Act is difficult
Speaker 3: to pass. The only thing I can say that's good
Speaker 3: right now is the Supreme Court has gotten rid of
Speaker 3: this deference to regulatory agencies. And there is a chance
Speaker 3: that by lawsuits gradually making their way to the Supreme
Speaker 3: Court that we will neuter some of these federal agencies
Speaker 3: that are writing such egregious regulations.
Speaker 1: And lastly, talk about corporate taxes company business taxes. Every
Speaker 1: dollar from government requiring businesses to pay more corporate tax
Speaker 1: whatever it might be, are not paid by the companies.
Speaker 1: They're paid by the consumers in the form of higher
Speaker 1: cost higher prices for the goods or services produced by
Speaker 1: that company. And so the canard by Kamala Harris and
Speaker 1: the great debate that somehow corporate taxes is going to
Speaker 1: go up, that means you're going to pay more for
Speaker 1: goods and services as a consumer.
Speaker 3: Correct, without question, that's true. Consumers pay the taxes. But
Speaker 3: also realize that if you raise taxes on American corporations,
Speaker 3: you'll have less American corporations, meaning that these corporations go overseas.
Speaker 3: So if you want American corporations to succeed, you have
Speaker 3: to have a level playing environment. You have to have
Speaker 3: equal taxes. For decades, Sweden, Denmark and all these countries
Speaker 3: we thought were more socialists than us actually had lower
Speaker 3: corporate taxes. We finally lowered it under Donald Trump and
Speaker 3: lowering the corporate taxes low and behold calls an economic boon,
Speaker 3: and guess what, more tax revenue because the economy grew
Speaker 3: so fast that even at lower rate it more tax
Speaker 3: revenue came in. So this is a big distinction between
Speaker 3: the parties, and if we can make that distinction, I
Speaker 3: think people will choose the prosperity that comes with lower taxes,
Speaker 3: less regulation. But we've got to make that case and
Speaker 3: got to make the case that we are the party
Speaker 3: of the American Dream, where the millionaires of next year
Speaker 3: will be people who will have come from ordinary circumstances,
Speaker 3: ordinary backgrounds, who become the wealthy of an inter generation
Speaker 3: of America. But only in America does that happen because
Speaker 3: of freedom, capitalism, international trade, you know, and only one
Speaker 3: party is offering that.
Speaker 1: You know, Quesse Senator Rouan Paul, thank you great having
Speaker 1: you on again. Even though Kamala Harris may have won
Speaker 1: the debate, the policy differences remain, and you have to
Speaker 1: think as a consumer, as an American. She may have
Speaker 1: won the debate, but I'm not voting for Trump. I'm
Speaker 1: voting for the United States of America. I'm voting for
Speaker 1: our system of government. I'm voting for the way the
Speaker 1: First Amendment should read. I'm voting for the Second Amendment.
Speaker 1: I'm voting for the Fourth Amendment. I'm voting for a
Speaker 1: closed down I'm voting for legal immigration. I'm not voting
Speaker 1: for Trump. I'm voting for America and Senator Ran Paul
Speaker 1: I couldn't. I just I wish there was more senators
Speaker 1: out there like you.
Speaker 3: So thanks hat, Bill enjoyed it.
Speaker 1: We'll see what happens. All let's continue with more. Thank you,
Speaker 1: senator All. Let's continue with more news and students report
Speaker 1: next at Truma the Reds News Radio seven hundred Wow.
Speaker 5: Pellow Windows and Doors of Greater Cincinnati's exclusive Green.
Speaker 1: Because she has no policy.
Speaker 6: Everything that she believed three years ago and four years
Speaker 6: ago is out the window. She's going to my philosophy now.
Speaker 6: In fact, I was going to send her a mega hat.
Speaker 6: She's gone to my philosophy. But if she ever got elected,
Speaker 6: she changed it, and it will be the end of
Speaker 6: our country. Because this is the one that weaponized, not me.
Speaker 6: She weaponized. I probably took a bullet to the head
Speaker 6: because of the things that they say about me. They
Speaker 6: talk about democracy. I'm a threat to democracy. They're the threat.
Speaker 2: She is.
Speaker 6: Biden the worst inflation. We've ever had a horrible economy
Speaker 6: because inflation has made it so bad that you can't
Speaker 6: get away with that.
Speaker 1: Thank you. I want to respond to that.
Speaker 7: Though, I want to just respond briefly clearly. I'm not
Speaker 7: Joe Biden, and I am certainly not Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Do you believe you bear any responsibility in the way
Speaker 3: that withdrawal played out?
Speaker 7: Well, I will tell you I agreed with President Biden's
Speaker 7: decision to pull out of Afghanistan, for presidents said they would,
Speaker 7: and Joe Biden did, and as a result, America's taxpayers
Speaker 7: are not paying the three hundred million dollars a day
Speaker 7: we were paying for that endless war.
Speaker 6: She was big on defund the police in Minnesota. She
Speaker 6: went out, I'm talking now, if you don't mind, please.
Speaker 1: Oh hell, hello, quiet, And I'm scho I'm broadcasting. God,
Speaker 1: I'm saying. I know you didn't watch the debate. You
Speaker 1: were asleep. Yeah, I felt bad about it. I get
Speaker 1: it this morning more fired up. I have a I
Speaker 1: have a question for you, or you prepared go ahead.
Speaker 1: Assuming your friend Donald Trump lost the debate does not
Speaker 1: mean Kamala Harris's policies are correct for the country. No,
Speaker 1: so even if she won the debate and the Swifties
Speaker 1: are going nuts, the left wing media is fawning over
Speaker 1: the Swifties. Can you identify as swifty as Sarah Elise?
Speaker 1: Is she a swifty? I have no idea.
Speaker 8: I asked, why did you ask her? I don't want
Speaker 8: to ask why to ask her? I don't want to
Speaker 8: you ask her. I want to know you asked her?
Speaker 8: To ask her?
Speaker 1: You ask her, I'm not asking her. Will leave the.
Speaker 8: Stood Reporters a proud service of your local Tame Star
Speaker 8: heating and air conditioning dealers.
Speaker 1: Tame Star quality you can feel.
Speaker 8: In beautiful Milford, the home of one main gallery called
Speaker 8: Baker Heating at five one three eight three one fifty
Speaker 8: one twenty four spots.
Speaker 3: Willy.
Speaker 8: We open up with a Bengals update brought to you
Speaker 8: by Good Spirits, Winding Tobacco and Party Town, thirteen locations
Speaker 8: in northern Kentucky. James Rapine of Bengals on SI reports
Speaker 8: I like him. The Bengals and the Jamar Chase were
Speaker 8: close to an agreement. Matter of fact, the Bengals offered
Speaker 8: Chase a four year deal worth one hundred and forty
Speaker 8: million ninety millli guaranteed.
Speaker 1: What thank you? And he said no.
Speaker 8: The loan snag in the in the agreement had to
Speaker 8: do with when the guarantees kicked in Chase's camp. Apparently
Speaker 8: one of the the guarantee money and the injury protections
Speaker 8: to kick in earlier in the deal deal, and that's
Speaker 8: when they broke down.
Speaker 1: Well, he signed the deal. I don't know. I don't
Speaker 1: care about the terms. Do you He's going to get paid.
Speaker 1: He's already getting paid. Are you going to go to
Speaker 1: the dog pound to get lunch?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 8: Bengals defense fourteen misstackles against the Patriots. According to the
Speaker 8: sweet Anaumo, there's that number six year high. There's that
Speaker 8: number again, fourteen miss tackles. By the way, the morning
Speaker 8: sports talk host around the country have soured on Joe
Speaker 8: Burrow putting in the same they know as Deshaun Watson
Speaker 8: and Jordan Love.
Speaker 1: Well, they're stupid.
Speaker 8: You'll be going to put Joe Burrow in with the
Speaker 8: with the sex Ataday to Shawn Watson, I'm not saying that.
Speaker 8: The experts on ESPN, now what do they know? They
Speaker 8: don't know who that goofball? Who who said that? Can't say,
Speaker 8: I can't say former Bengals quarterbacks Ken Anderson and Boomer
Speaker 8: Asiason have joined Isaac Curtis and Leap and Lamar Parrish
Speaker 8: on the list of one hundred and eighty three senior
Speaker 8: player nominees for the Pro Football Hall of Fame Class
Speaker 8: of twenty twenty five. Anderson, what number did he wear?
Speaker 8: Number fourteen. There's that number again. And you know what
Speaker 8: happened on this day, September eleventh, nineteen eighty five.
Speaker 1: That's the date that uh Pete Rose did his deal
Speaker 1: with the forty one ninety two came the hit king.
Speaker 1: I was there? Were you there? Yes? I was, I
Speaker 1: was there. TJ.
Speaker 8: Friedel had a two run single. Rett Louder first big
Speaker 8: league win. Dealing again last night, Red's blank the Cardinals
Speaker 8: three nothing. It's three in a row and the Reds
Speaker 8: have started the playoff push.
Speaker 1: If they win the rest heard it here first? What
Speaker 1: you laughed at me when I said this? The Reds
Speaker 1: may make the playoffs.
Speaker 8: He held Saint Louis scoreless through five innings, and then
Speaker 8: Emilio Pegan came on at the ninth and almost blew it.
Speaker 8: He loaded the basis on two singles in a walk,
Speaker 8: then struck out three in a row. To wrap it up,
Speaker 8: segment Nothing's easy? Have you ever eaten a cat for lunch?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 1: Game two of the series?
Speaker 8: Tonight you six oh five Sports Talk, Ralph's American Grill
Speaker 8: Inside pitched at six forty five, and then Kelsey Chevrolet
Speaker 8: Extra Inning show after the game.
Speaker 1: Now, have you had a goose? Have you eaten a goose? No?
Speaker 8: Record set by Philly slugger and Middletown native Kyle Schwarber.
Speaker 8: Last night he hit his fourteenth leadoff home run of
Speaker 8: the year. What number is that fourteenth? There's that number again.
Speaker 8: Dayton is down one game to none of their best
Speaker 8: of three series against Lake County in the Midwest League playoffs,
Speaker 8: and they scored fourteen runs. No, they lost four to three.
Speaker 1: Half. There's that four again. Yeah, let's see im saying.
Speaker 1: CBS Sports says a Xavier.
Speaker 8: Four days after the Skyline Chili Crosstown shootout against UC,
Speaker 8: the Musketeers will open up Big East play on the
Speaker 8: road at Yukon?
Speaker 1: Oh Oh, Dan Hurley is he gonna wear a Bengals
Speaker 1: go the way? Max Montoya was given a Yukon hat
Speaker 1: at the Ruler of the Jungle by Dan Hurley. So
Speaker 1: those two did meet, They did meet? Bingo. There you go.
Speaker 1: Dan Hurley was nine years old, right much like mean
Speaker 1: Joe Green with a Coca Cola ad correct signed a hat,
Speaker 1: a Bengals hat for Dan Hurley, who's some forty one
Speaker 1: years later. Pretty good right there? Back at you. Max
Speaker 1: is a good guy, so be nice to the little
Speaker 1: people around you. Segment like Sean Compton. One day he
Speaker 1: may be your boss, Sarah Elise can one day be
Speaker 1: your Can I get a TV show like you? Maybe?
Speaker 1: Oh it's possible. Okay, celebrity hotline. Hello, Wait a minute, Kenny, Kenny, what,
Speaker 1: Kenny what?
Speaker 3: I'll tell you.
Speaker 9: One damn me. I'm up here in Springfield. I'm looking
Speaker 9: for Barbiecat and Barbie Dog. I'm trying to get something
Speaker 9: up here, Get a damn sandwich. I'm trying to figure
Speaker 9: out why I put Tarner sauce on these seeder well Sabby,
Speaker 9: or what I do.
Speaker 1: I haven't heard from you in years.
Speaker 8: You're still you're stilling the truck or Kenny's still driving,
Speaker 8: but you're in Springfield looking for lunch, looking for lunch.
Speaker 9: When I get these hogs out of the truck, I'm
Speaker 9: going down the pound. I'm gonna start hauling dogs and
Speaker 9: couch and I'm gonna look and pray Haitian community that
Speaker 9: drop them off. Hell, let damn people learn, Saloni.
Speaker 1: You're always an entrepreneur. Kenny. I tell you what. I'm
Speaker 1: glad you recovered from that accident in Wisconsin. I'm glad
Speaker 1: you're feeling better. But you're gonna go.
Speaker 9: That one was a bad one. I had them damn
Speaker 9: hogs walking away with me. Sound like when I was
Speaker 9: first married.
Speaker 1: All right, Kenny, we gotta run, But I tell you,
Speaker 1: don't be a stranger. You gotta you gotta call back.
Speaker 1: But you're gonna go to the dog pound to get
Speaker 1: lunch for the Haitians.
Speaker 9: Hell yeah, brother, I'm gonna get some cold fish pine too.
Speaker 9: Just what Grammy used.
Speaker 1: To make pie. Seg you ever have a crawfish?
Speaker 8: No, you got to bring lunch down to us one day.
Speaker 2: Come I am.
Speaker 1: If you got a fat dog, bring him in.
Speaker 9: Hot food, sauce on it.
Speaker 1: Kenny. Thank you for your call, Cherry, thank you.
Speaker 8: Segment. We haven't heard from Kenny, and how long he's
Speaker 8: the best. He had a tear accident.
Speaker 1: We got to get back to the commercials plead it
Speaker 1: if you can get us out of Kenny of norwood
Speaker 1: Loo from Missouri, build a box Spider. How about uh
Speaker 1: Doc Tommy Scott from Tacoa, Georgia rubbing the snake oil segment?
Speaker 1: Get me out of the Studge Report.
Speaker 8: Willie and utter of oh those fine gentlemen, We leave
Speaker 8: you with the immortal words of the Stewed Report.
Speaker 1: I have no idea what I'm doing. Thank you? Thanks
Speaker 1: for sure. Ain't that the truth segment? Thank you? Ever
Speaker 1: have a juicy cat for lunch?
Speaker 8: No, he's gonna pick him up and take him to
Speaker 8: the Haitian community, Make make, make a few bucks. On
Speaker 8: news radio seven hundreds W.
Speaker 1: I'm Bill cunning in the Great American picking up the
Speaker 1: pieces of the Great Debate. Curtis House is with NewsBusters
Speaker 1: dot org, which is a part of my friend Brent
Speaker 1: Burzel's Media research Center. And I'll let him give you
Speaker 1: the facts on the Great Debate as far as the moderators.
Speaker 1: But before we get started, Curtis House, welcome again to
Speaker 1: the Bill Cunningham Show, and I have your story of
Speaker 1: a few days ago headline one percent ABC Debate moderators.
Speaker 1: David Muir hosts most pro Harris, left wing newscasting in America.
Speaker 1: First of all, before we talk about the debate itself,
Speaker 1: tell the American people the history of the moderators. There
Speaker 1: are Lindsay Davis and David Muir and their reaction to
Speaker 1: the Trumpster.
Speaker 4: Okay, so David Muir, Folks is not a very smart man.
Speaker 4: What you saw last night is largely what was handed
Speaker 4: to him, because as we see on World News tonight,
Speaker 4: he is the Ron Burgundy of news anchors. The guy
Speaker 4: has a very elementary sentence structure that would be offensive
Speaker 4: to some five year olds because he speaks in incomplete thoughts.
Speaker 4: He tries to use the word tonight multiple times in
Speaker 4: a sentence or thought. He offers three or four minutes
Speaker 4: of teases before he actually goes into his like the
Speaker 4: set of news stories. So we had that problem going in.
Speaker 4: Their political director, Recline, I believe, is the brother of
Speaker 4: Ezra Kline, a longtime liberal pundit.
Speaker 2: So there he goes.
Speaker 4: So there was also checkbox there because the political director
Speaker 4: is often involved in debate prep. And we also had
Speaker 4: Lindsay Davis, the other debate moderator, who was an anchor
Speaker 4: on their streaming platform maybe see News Live, as well
Speaker 4: as a fill in host on their different shows. She
Speaker 4: said all kinds of crazy things over the years, such
Speaker 4: as talking about reproductive rights with Kamala Harris, asking her
Speaker 4: what this means to her, and during the DNC drawing
Speaker 4: the insinuation that Donald Trump made a visit to Howell,
Speaker 4: Michigan because uh, he was giving a thumbs up to
Speaker 4: a bunch of KKK losers aka Feds who marched down
Speaker 4: the street. However, long before that, a little while before
Speaker 4: he came to visit, there all sorts of crazy conspiracy theories.
Speaker 4: So their coverage of Harris and she was annoyed to
Speaker 4: the presidential candidate on the Democrats side, was one hundred
Speaker 4: percent positive ninety three percent negative for Trump. That kind
Speaker 4: of part for the course, that's a that was about
Speaker 4: what we've usually been seeing in the last five, six,
Speaker 4: seven years of Trump. But it was really the Harris number.
Speaker 4: And the thing though that it was really particularly concerning
Speaker 4: the two things below the surface in our study that
Speaker 4: were disturbing from your Mure and his team never labeled
Speaker 4: Kamala Harris a progressive or a liberal. There was no
Speaker 4: audience label ever attached to her.
Speaker 2: Not once you said Trump.
Speaker 4: There'd be so much of Trump doing it.
Speaker 1: But yeah, but you say in your story under data
Speaker 1: September the ninth, and I want to put a sharper
Speaker 1: point on that. MRC Media Research analysts reviewed one hundred
Speaker 1: campaign stories that aired on ABC's World News Tonight from the
Speaker 1: day Harris end of the race on July twenty first
Speaker 1: through September the sixth, including the weekends. The analysts found
Speaker 1: one hundred percent of the stories about Kamala Harris or positive,
Speaker 1: while on the other side ninety three percent. I'm surprised
Speaker 1: it's that low. Ninety three percent of the stories about
Speaker 1: Trump were negative. Now to compare not just ABC, but
Speaker 1: you also have in this beautiful column. Anyone can look
Speaker 1: at a NewsBusters dot org that CBS had ninety four
Speaker 1: percent positive instead of one hundred percent, and the most
Speaker 1: independent was NBC and Lester Holt that was positive for
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris seventy one percent of the time and rarely
Speaker 1: positive for Donald Trump. And so I'm looking at this
Speaker 1: and the debate demonstrated that there were numerous occasions, not
Speaker 1: one occasion, as CNN said that night, but there were
Speaker 1: numerous occasion when Kamala Harris either lied or to be
Speaker 1: kind misrepresented the truth and didn't answer the questions at all.
Speaker 1: And David Mure and Lindsay Davis never held her her account.
Speaker 1: But every time Trump may have said something about crime, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, crime is way up, but enforcement of
Speaker 1: crime is way low, but crime itself is way up,
Speaker 1: they're fact checked in real time by David Muir and
Speaker 1: by Lindsay Davis. But they never fact checked Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: But did everage Americans figure that out? Do you think
Speaker 1: that's another issue?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 2: Exactly?
Speaker 4: There were six fact checks of Trump. Okay, there were
Speaker 4: six fact checks of Trump where they interjected during this debate.
Speaker 4: There were seven Harris favored questions to Trump sands fact
Speaker 4: checks and to Trump there are only three questions that
Speaker 4: were more favored in his direction. There was no sort
Speaker 4: of yes or no follow up to Kamala Harris when
Speaker 4: she would waffle or offer word salads. Even their fact
Speaker 4: checks were wrong. You know, Lindsay Davis claiming that denying
Speaker 4: the existence of birth abortions, are you kidding me? You
Speaker 4: have multiple states like Colorado that allow unrestricted abortion. Liberal
Speaker 4: news outlets have done profiles of abortionists to do abortions
Speaker 4: in the seventh, eighth, ninth month talking about the number
Speaker 4: of illegal aliens. David Moore even got that wrong. He
Speaker 4: claimed it's only eleven million people that are in office.
Speaker 4: But that was supposedly back when Biden took office. That
Speaker 4: was a very conservative astment then, not now. So I mean,
Speaker 4: those are just a few examples, and it just goes
Speaker 4: on and on and on and on. It's so it
Speaker 4: was so frustrating to see just how like little these
Speaker 4: people you cared about actually putting keeping the rails on
Speaker 4: a debate the economy, yes, was talked about first, but
Speaker 4: it was largely an afterthought, which I think kind of
Speaker 4: squares with what happens on World News Tonight with David
Speaker 4: Mure because very often Bill, as I said, he's not
Speaker 4: a very smart man. The things that excite David Mure
Speaker 4: that aren't political on a newscast have to do with
Speaker 4: the weather or like playing collisions on the tarmac, like
Speaker 4: what happened last night yesterday in Atlanta. That kind of
Speaker 4: stuff tickles his fancy, like he is very excited about
Speaker 4: that kind of weird you know, bizarre stories or natural
Speaker 4: gas explosion in New York City, Yes, we know, Okay,
Speaker 4: New York City is a very big city. But like
Speaker 4: your local news doesn't have to be our news. Those
Speaker 4: are the kind of things that he finds very exciting. So,
Speaker 4: you know, whatever binder they gave him last night, he
Speaker 4: totally went right with it, and he completely nuked their credibility.
Speaker 4: And this morning on Good Morning America, they're very excited
Speaker 4: about this.
Speaker 1: They think it was great. It's unbelievable. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is wonderful because they've exposed Donald Trump, etc. And I
Speaker 1: would say this in defense of Donald Trump that when
Speaker 1: you play every away game and basketball, let's say you're
Speaker 1: playing high school in college, you're going to a to
Speaker 1: a terrible place to play. If you're the visiting team,
Speaker 1: maybe you're playing the Georgia Bulldogs in Athens. That's a
Speaker 1: terrible place to go play a college football game. And
Speaker 1: when the home team selects all the referees and the
Speaker 1: officials and they pay them, and then you come into
Speaker 1: that environment, you got to be ready. You got to
Speaker 1: be loaded for bear. You got to have facts. And
Speaker 1: I wish when Kamala Harris brought up the Central Park
Speaker 1: five or brought up the meme about goose or geese
Speaker 1: or whatever, dogs and cats, cats being barbecued in Springfield, Ohio.
Speaker 1: I wish the Trumpster would have said, Look, this is
Speaker 1: not about what happened years ago, or about dogs and
Speaker 1: cats being barbecued on a spit in Springfield. This is
Speaker 1: about the fact that twenty thousand Haitians showed up into
Speaker 1: a small community in south and central Ohio and they've
Speaker 1: overwhelmed the schools and the hospital systems and the living conditions.
Speaker 1: They are not twenty thousand extra places to live in
Speaker 1: a city of sixty thousand people. He could have turned
Speaker 1: it back on him, and so he didn't hit his
Speaker 1: jump shot, even though the officials were bought and paid for.
Speaker 1: And that's on Trump, am I correct?
Speaker 4: Yeah, No, I think you're right. Unfortunately, Trump had a
Speaker 4: number of opportunities. When David Mure then after one of
Speaker 4: Trump's strongest answers, I think it was his strongest answer
Speaker 4: at the night, talking about Afghanistan and the shame that
Speaker 4: it brought to this country and the pain that so
Speaker 4: many families and other Americans are still in who lost
Speaker 4: those at Abbigad and since then, and David, you are
Speaker 4: then pivoted to talking about oh so, why did you
Speaker 4: claim Kamala Harris only recently started saying she was black
Speaker 4: at the National Association of Black Journalists when speaking to
Speaker 4: our Rachel Scott, Trump could have then just sat there
Speaker 4: and said, hold on, hold on, David, this is the
Speaker 4: stupid issue that the American people don't care about. What
Speaker 4: I'm talking about is real Americans who lost their lives,
Speaker 4: or when talk about illegal immigration to your point, talk
Speaker 4: about angel mom, talk about those families whose loved ones
Speaker 4: aren't coming back because of crimes committed by illegal immigrants.
Speaker 4: And he could have turned this argument and say, well, oh,
Speaker 4: you say that migrants commit less crimes than regular citizens,
Speaker 4: but the reality is all crime committed by illegal immigrants
Speaker 4: or crimes that did not have to exist if we
Speaker 4: controlled this border. And it is a shame that she
Speaker 4: doesn't want to do anything about it. Can you please
Speaker 4: you know, or turn it around even say, as you've
Speaker 4: seen here tonight, ladies and gentlemen, she's not said once
Speaker 4: what she would do differently than Joe Biden. We'll talk
Speaker 4: about how she would separate herself from Joe Biden, because
Speaker 4: Joe Biden has been incredibly unpopular. His policy has been
Speaker 4: very unpopular. That's what she's doing she's running as a
Speaker 4: second Joe Biden term.
Speaker 1: Well, he also could have said on crime, Look, big
Speaker 1: cities do not inquire to the immigration status of those
Speaker 1: day arrest, So how do you know who's committing crime
Speaker 1: when big city police departments don't inquire where you came from?
Speaker 1: What is your immigration status? But by rules and laws
Speaker 1: in those big blue cities and big blue states, they
Speaker 1: didn't even ask where you came from. And they simply
Speaker 1: arrest people then release them anyway, So there's no inde
Speaker 1: and so that's the answer.
Speaker 4: They refuse or they refuse and even if they do
Speaker 4: track them down. We see this all the time across
Speaker 4: the country. ICE knows and finds out when illegal immigrants
Speaker 4: are arrested for crimes that they allegedly commit, and they're like, yeah,
Speaker 4: we want to go to portum to heck with this,
Speaker 4: and the legal system in these liberal cities are like, no, no, no,
Speaker 4: we got to release them, and they refuse to cooperate
Speaker 4: even then, how else do you say, how awesome am
Speaker 4: I supposed to say something different?
Speaker 2: How am I supposed to do.
Speaker 4: Something different than these liberal cities don't care about protecting
Speaker 4: the American people? Okay, Like what are we supposed to
Speaker 4: do with that? But you know, you could have turned
Speaker 4: this on its head because you know David Nor said
Speaker 4: crime is down, Well, that's based on flawed if BI statistics.
Speaker 4: That's another point that he could have really hammered home.
Speaker 4: And it's all about again vibes. You know, to quote
Speaker 4: Kamala Harris about vibes, Americans don't feel safe, Americans do
Speaker 4: not feel like they are economically secure.
Speaker 2: Why is that?
Speaker 1: Yeah, And what policies would you change that you've supported
Speaker 1: right now? When she said no American soldiers are deployed,
Speaker 1: about three or four months ago, there were four American
Speaker 1: soldiers killed through artillery shells in Iraq, and we have
Speaker 1: thousands of soldiers there for reasons unclear to me, but
Speaker 1: they're in harm's way. We have soldiers getting injured all
Speaker 1: over the world because of the failed policies of this administration,
Speaker 1: and she forgot about that. I also would have said,
Speaker 1: your boss, Joe Biden said a couple months ago that
Speaker 1: there's been no American soldiers killed in his watch. What
Speaker 1: about the thirteen and Abby's Gate in Afghanistan. Trump didn't
Speaker 1: mention any of that either, But that doesn't change the
Speaker 1: fact that here we are Wednesday afternoon, and things are
Speaker 1: not very good. In fact, things are quite bad. And
Speaker 1: the fact that he had a bad debate performance doesn't
Speaker 1: change what's happening right now all around America this Wednesday afternoon.
Speaker 1: It didn't change any of that either, And I hope
Speaker 1: the American people figure it out. On your website. You
Speaker 1: have a great post here by Jadi Vance, who, by
Speaker 1: the way, lives in Cincinnati, Ohio, and goes to my
Speaker 1: church at Saint Curtrud's. That's a different matter. But JD
Speaker 1: Van's school CNN's Kitlyn Collins on cat memes and immigration.
Speaker 1: I didn't see that segment. Tell the American people what
Speaker 1: that is.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 4: So Jdie Vance usually like a lot of these other candidates,
Speaker 4: goes around and talks about goes to the spin room,
Speaker 4: and he brought up the Springfield example. So he asked
Speaker 4: Caitlyn Collins. Caitlyn Collins said, basically, they said there's no evidence.
Speaker 4: The city manager says there's no evidence. People on Twitter
Speaker 4: say there's no evidence to it, and he says he's
Speaker 4: heard I have heard quote both firsthand and secondhand report
Speaker 4: saying the stuff is happening. So they very clearly, meaning
Speaker 4: the people on the ground dealing with this think this
Speaker 4: is happening. And I think it's important for journalists to
Speaker 4: actually get on the ground and uncover this stuff for themselves.
Speaker 4: When you have a lot of people saying, my pastor
Speaker 4: cats are being abducted, this is crazy stuff. Whether those
Speaker 4: rumors turn out to mostly be true, somewhat true, whatever
Speaker 4: they may be, Caitlyn. And then they bring up your
Speaker 4: point about the number of people coming in communicable diseases
Speaker 4: that have been coming in, and these are results of
Speaker 4: these border policies. This is yeah, Trump could have done
Speaker 4: in the debate, which makes me even more excited about
Speaker 4: the upcoming debate, his debate because he's gonna absolutely mop
Speaker 4: the floor with this Tim Waltz clown. I hope it's
Speaker 4: gonna be a thorough demolition. And when Nora O'Donnell and
Speaker 4: Margaret Brennan of CBS try to engage in some funny business, JD.
Speaker 4: Vance is gonna like smash yeah, like take their question,
Speaker 4: tell them to take their questions and shove it into
Speaker 4: the next century.
Speaker 1: Well, well, what's gonna happen on that debate? JD's gonna
Speaker 1: win it over. Tim Waltz. It looks like the marshmallow
Speaker 1: Man and some and some movie. But nonetheless he's gonna
Speaker 1: win by they're gonna say, look, the VP debate doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: Let's fair about the VP debate doesn't matter. What matters
Speaker 1: is David Muir and Lindsey Davis. Uh and the great
Speaker 1: job the three of them did against Donald Trump. Well
Speaker 1: we got to run. But I love the website NewsBusters
Speaker 1: dot org. Check it out and once again, very much
Speaker 1: one of the great websites that I see. And Curtis Hawk,
Speaker 1: once again, thank you for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show.
Speaker 1: With your permission, we'll do it again. Thank you, Curtis.
Speaker 4: Yeah, thank you Bill.
Speaker 1: Go Bengles. God, well that's another issue, but thank you
Speaker 1: very much. Let's continue with more. Curtis, thank you. Go Bengals,
Speaker 1: go Red starting pitching. It's all wonderful. Go Michigan football,
Speaker 1: Notre Dame, it's all great. On news radio seven hundreds WLW.
Speaker 10: So she just started by saying she's going to do this,
Speaker 10: She's going to do that, She's going to do all
Speaker 10: these wonderful things.
Speaker 1: Why hasn't she done it?
Speaker 10: She's been there for three and a half years. They've
Speaker 10: had three and a half years to fix the border.
Speaker 10: They've had three and a half years to create jobs
Speaker 10: and all the things we talked about, Why hasn't she
Speaker 10: done it?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 9: Hello, quiet, and I'm spoke.
Speaker 1: I'm broadcasting.
Speaker 6: Darky.
Speaker 1: We spoke about I don't know about ten fifteen, ten thirty.
Speaker 5: It was about halfway through the bottle at that point,
Speaker 5: old grand Dad going well, and you're switching a Crown
Speaker 5: Royale then drinking alone, George. But today I'm in a
Speaker 5: great mood now, you know, because now we're at a
Speaker 5: point things are so bad they can only go up.
Speaker 5: This is what I was telling you last week, and
Speaker 5: everything's looking great. That's when I'm down in the dumps
Speaker 5: because I know what's coming.
Speaker 1: So it's sure enough. Here it came.
Speaker 5: Now we're on the way out now, you see. Can
Speaker 5: play as bad as they did on Saturday. There's no
Speaker 5: way the Bengals can play as bad as they did
Speaker 5: on Sunday.
Speaker 1: Notre Dame R no way Notre Dame can play as
Speaker 1: bad as they.
Speaker 5: Did on satur Michigan Wolverine, Michigan, There's no way they
Speaker 5: can play as bad as they did the same thing.
Speaker 1: Yes, Red starting pitching.
Speaker 5: We're done with the debates. We're done with that nonsense.
Speaker 5: It's done with that, you see, and it's all up
Speaker 5: from here now.
Speaker 1: We got to call an hour ago from Kenny of
Speaker 1: Norwood and he said, hey, Commander, should I go to
Speaker 1: the dog pound and get lunch for those Haitians. I'll
Speaker 1: pick up some plump ones and we'll barbecue him in Springfield.
Speaker 1: He was dropping off the pigs and Ireton pigs and
Speaker 1: I Iarrington and they had a dead reefer to come
Speaker 1: and wants to pick up farm animals and pets and
Speaker 1: take them to Springfield of barbecue them.
Speaker 5: So how does ABC know that those reports are discredited?
Speaker 5: I have them do There's a nine to one one clip.
Speaker 5: There's also a clip of a guy at like a
Speaker 5: a city hall meeting describing the same thing. And what's
Speaker 5: his incentive to to do that? Shouldn't you at least said, boy,
Speaker 5: let's get down and check that out.
Speaker 1: How much be a democrat? He's a Democrat, that's right,
Speaker 1: because you have all nine one calls saying the Haitians
Speaker 1: are killing gooses and geese multiple reason, how about gooses,
Speaker 1: not gooses geese? And four Haitians two men and two
Speaker 1: women's waiting in ponds to catch the geese and the
Speaker 1: goose the fricasium Haitian style. And it's anymous to miss
Speaker 1: that is know that that absolutely didn't. That's not important.
Speaker 1: Well do you have hope? I have. I have a
Speaker 1: ton of hope. Take good hope always, Kenny nor would
Speaker 1: is hope? More geese? More geese? Is a commander? You
Speaker 1: in a German shepherd or a terrier for lunch? So
Speaker 1: does Andy defrayin He's coming down for lunch maybe tomorrow.
Speaker 1: I guess we're off. I'm off tomorrow. You're probably off
Speaker 1: the reds play. But on Friday we'll get some goose
Speaker 1: in here.
Speaker 5: With Name one policy that Kamala put forth last night
Speaker 5: that's going to change the current situation.
Speaker 1: Name one?
Speaker 5: Anybody I've been asking this question. Everybody asked you today.
Speaker 5: No one can say one. No solutions, just giveaways.
Speaker 1: I dare talk about her as a woman and a
Speaker 1: person of color. I dare you to do that.
Speaker 5: That's the thing Trump, as I told you last night
Speaker 5: in the phone, as I was getting ready to go
Speaker 5: to my second bottle of the Grandad. Well, the problem
Speaker 5: is Trump has he has to make a full shot
Speaker 5: with his back to the basket, blindfolded, standing on one leg,
Speaker 5: using his left hand in a wind store that he
Speaker 5: has to make that shot.
Speaker 1: That's that's what he's up against. Three on one. It's tough.
Speaker 1: According to the AP. The AP say, not exactly newsmax right,
Speaker 1: not exactly.
Speaker 5: A Trump fact checked four times, Kamala Harris fact checked zero.
Speaker 5: Mirror Davis press Trump six times, press Kamala Harris zero times.
Speaker 5: Trump fourteen false statements, all of them checked. Kamala Harris
Speaker 5: sixteen false statements, None of them checked.
Speaker 1: Your comments. I got the list here of the twenty
Speaker 1: one false statements Kamala Harris made without the commentators reflecting
Speaker 1: it all. How do they? I mean the soup.
Speaker 5: The easiest one is the Charlottesville right that's been debunked
Speaker 5: a hundred times by shows everyone.
Speaker 1: That's an easy one.
Speaker 5: My ten year old has said, now wait a minute,
Speaker 5: miss Harris, that has clearly been debunked here.
Speaker 1: You can't say that. AB would not do that. And
Speaker 1: they went back and said that there's no states out there.
Speaker 5: Mirror Clark Crackton said there's no states out there allowed
Speaker 5: pro term abortion.
Speaker 1: There's actually six with six thousand.
Speaker 5: Abortions in one year six that that accommodate post term abortions,
Speaker 5: including Minnesota.
Speaker 1: He was absolutely right.
Speaker 5: So what do you do when the when the people
Speaker 5: that rule the debate say no, no, no, you're wrong. No,
Speaker 5: I'm actually right, No, you're wrong. Is abortion healthcare to
Speaker 5: the unborn baby? To most upperclass women, it is. It's
Speaker 5: healthcare for the baby. Oh good, No, it's healthcare for
Speaker 5: for them. It's it's it's certainly not killing it unborn. No,
Speaker 5: it's women's reproductive rice. Yes, reproductive rice. Yes, not for
Speaker 5: the baby. Baby's dead. And half of them are female, right.
Speaker 1: Man, by statistically more than half of them. Yeah, segment
Speaker 1: your reaction.
Speaker 8: Well either Stoodente reporters, A proud service of your local
Speaker 8: tame Star heating and air conditioning dealers, Tamestar quality you
Speaker 8: could feel in beautiful Western hills called Derbin Heating and
Speaker 8: Cooling at five one, three, five, nine, eighty four forty nine,
Speaker 8: or go to Derbin Heating and Cooling.
Speaker 1: Dot com spots.
Speaker 8: Reds and Cardinals meet again tonight, Reds winning last night
Speaker 8: three to nothing behind Rhet Lauder's first big league win
Speaker 8: H six oh five. Sports Talk rouse American Grill Inside
Speaker 8: Pitch in six forty five, then Kelsey Chevrolet Xtra Inning
Speaker 8: Show after the game.
Speaker 1: If Kenny and Norwood brings in some dogs on Friday
Speaker 1: for lunch, would you like to have? Maybe a Docsin
Speaker 1: or a Terry or which one would you like? No,
Speaker 1: give me a Chihuaha. Today Bengals are on the field.
Speaker 1: T Higgins not practicing on the on the sideline, Marius
Speaker 1: Mims back in What with the pick? What a three
Speaker 1: key number one? You forgot about him?
Speaker 5: He's out there? Houston Texans running back Joe Mixon what
Speaker 5: thirty carries for one fifty nine? The AFC Offensive Player
Speaker 5: of the Week? Who do you play for?
Speaker 1: Before? Seven years?
Speaker 2: Here?
Speaker 1: I believe about Andrew Whitworth the year Super Bowl? Who
Speaker 1: do you play for? The National Football League average.
Speaker 8: Twenty one million viewers per game during the league's opening week,
Speaker 8: making it the most watched week one on record.
Speaker 1: Tell the Rock about your are chasing his contract dispute.
Speaker 5: James Rapine, who, by the way, joins our show at
Speaker 5: four o five.
Speaker 1: Bengals on SI report.
Speaker 8: The Bengals and the Jamar Chase close to an agreement,
Speaker 8: according to mister James. In fact, the Bengals offer Chase
Speaker 8: a four year deal worth one hundred and forty million,
Speaker 8: ninety million guaranteed.
Speaker 1: I'll take the ninety mili.
Speaker 8: The loan snag, according to James, and the agreement had
Speaker 8: to do with when the guarantees would kick in.
Speaker 1: When will they kick in?
Speaker 8: Chases Camp wanted the guaranteed money and the injury project
Speaker 8: projection protections.
Speaker 1: Now benefit the deal. I would want that too. That's
Speaker 1: when things broke down. Here's the deal.
Speaker 5: Here's what the owners need to either in the next
Speaker 5: collective bargain agreement or in the off season. Here and
Speaker 5: they need to get together and say, look, we need
Speaker 5: to collectively stand strong that there will be we will
Speaker 5: all demand no contracts will be negotiated during the season.
Speaker 5: Once camp starts. You're here, play play football, You're here
Speaker 5: practice football. Anything, if anything can happen before the season
Speaker 5: or after the season. That being like five six eight
Speaker 5: month period right there. We can talk about contracts all
Speaker 5: we want, but the first day of camp it ends,
Speaker 5: it's done.
Speaker 1: It's over.
Speaker 5: While we're in this terrible situation, right, h like a
Speaker 5: recruiting uh session, right yeah, like an early signing period. Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 5: You can't just sign any.
Speaker 1: What's the question? I got a question for you? Give it.
Speaker 1: I watch everything simultaneously. This morning ESPN host were very
Speaker 1: down on Joe Burrow. They did they did some research
Speaker 1: on this sainted one. What was his record last year
Speaker 1: with the Bengals before he got hurt four and four?
Speaker 3: Four?
Speaker 1: What was his record after he got hurt? Five and four?
Speaker 1: Of the Bengals played better without Joe Burrow than with
Speaker 1: Joe Burrow? He missed a lot of throws on Sunday
Speaker 1: he missed a whole bunch of throws. And secondly they said,
Speaker 1: when he has talent around him, he's really good, like
Speaker 1: an L.
Speaker 5: S U or the first Well, that was the thing
Speaker 5: with Dalton right when you had aj Green and take
Speaker 5: away the tale the rifer great get rid of Boyd.
Speaker 5: I think it's more of the issue the question is healthy?
Speaker 5: Is the wrist healthy?
Speaker 9: No?
Speaker 1: You know you see a lot of online.
Speaker 5: Of course, you see a lot of like going like
Speaker 5: this with the wrists and stuff. It doesn't look it's
Speaker 5: not comfortable. He couldn't pick up a water bottle on
Speaker 5: the bench.
Speaker 1: I saw that one too. He can't use his right
Speaker 1: hand to drink water out of a bottle. What can
Speaker 1: he use his right hand for? I can't say I'm
Speaker 1: glad you brought this up, Sarah Elise Left, I'm glad
Speaker 1: you brought that up. It said to Seg see you tonight,
Speaker 1: and what is it? Rocke what it was?
Speaker 8: I saying, I have no idea what it says. It
Speaker 8: looks like it looks like cigarettes. It's bourbon flavored condoms. Seg, Yeah,
Speaker 8: see you tonight. And what what do you What are
Speaker 8: you willing to say here about your heart? There's nothing
Speaker 8: s XO with a You're gonna.
Speaker 1: Pay for that. I'm just saying I got your shirt. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I get at least three days. He got three days
Speaker 1: of What are those condoms doing here? Segment? I don't
Speaker 1: know they said two?
Speaker 8: Seg Now, Sarah, you know who had you know who
Speaker 8: had those first?
Speaker 1: Slow dy? I didn't know that, don't correct.
Speaker 8: Maybe a subvert had about four or five packs of
Speaker 8: this pocket apparently.
Speaker 1: Now he's got one. Something's going on. Not sure. I
Speaker 1: don't want to cast any aspurss.
Speaker 8: Actually, Sarah from nine Am to Doune on the segment,
Speaker 8: I got another Bengals thought in my mind.
Speaker 5: So I watched the NFL this past weekend, and I
Speaker 5: saw Joe Alt first round draft pick, number five overall pick,
Speaker 5: absolutely shut down Max Crosby right, So total, big time,
Speaker 5: game changing production from a rookie.
Speaker 9: Right.
Speaker 5: I saw Xavier Worthy, a wide receiver for the Chiefs,
Speaker 5: number two touchdown, number one right, first overall pick.
Speaker 1: So I mean, and here, here's here's the deal. You
Speaker 1: look at the Bengals first round picks.
Speaker 5: The question is, where's the great contributions, the game changing
Speaker 5: contra number one picks from top picks of the Bengals.
Speaker 5: This last Sunday, Marius Mims Hurt didn't play. Chris Jenkins,
Speaker 5: second round pick, Hurt didn't play. Burton the wide receiver,
Speaker 5: third round pick four plays no targets. Last year's first
Speaker 5: round pick, Miles Murphy Hurt did not play.
Speaker 1: Then he got Doxil, you got DJ Turner.
Speaker 5: They've been okay, where's the production from the from from
Speaker 5: the top picks the bat It's happened in other places
Speaker 5: in the NFL, It's not happening here.
Speaker 1: We go to get I know the hurt, but come on,
Speaker 1: we gotta get gotta get production from the top guys.
Speaker 1: We got to get back to the commercial taken seg Man,
Speaker 1: get me out of the student's report. Is Joe Burrow
Speaker 1: an elite quarterback? They compared him to Deshaun Watson and
Speaker 1: uh and the great to Jordan Love. That's that's not accurate.
Speaker 8: So gotta get healthy, will you, and utter of a
Speaker 8: beautiful day here at the tri State. We leave you
Speaker 8: with the immortal words of the Steward Report.
Speaker 6: This election is not a choice between Democrats and Republicans.
Speaker 6: It's a choice between communism and freedom.
Speaker 1: That's what it's about. If you win a debate, that
Speaker 1: does not mean your policies are correct. Segment Thank you, Yes,
Speaker 1: thank you, SIGs taking that package with him in his
Speaker 1: right pocks put in his back pocket. See you tonight
Speaker 1: on news Radio seven hundred autobi