Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the nineteenth of May.
Speaker 3: You're of our Lord, twenty twenty six. Well, today is
Speaker 3: a day the Kentucky primary. This is about much more
Speaker 3: than just Trump versus a Congress who has opposed him
Speaker 3: on key issues. And on every one of these issues
Speaker 3: that he has opposed Trump, he has been with a constitution,
Speaker 3: with rule of law, with morality. And yet we see
Speaker 3: that the massive amount of money they have jacked this up,
Speaker 3: this record amount they're spending to stop Thomas Massey, and
Speaker 3: I'm talking about they, the Zionists. It's jumped up by
Speaker 3: fifty percent in just the last week. This is a
Speaker 3: referendum on whether we will have an American government or
Speaker 3: a Zionist occupied government.
Speaker 2: That's reality.
Speaker 3: This is elections at their worst, folks, outside money, outside
Speaker 3: not just of this state, outside of the country, outside of.
Speaker 2: The constitution, outside of morality.
Speaker 3: And they'll also see Emon Musk going full Antichrist.
Speaker 2: I don't even know if he realizes it or not.
Speaker 3: And as Trump is pushing another grand deception, the UF hoax,
Speaker 3: will be right back. You know, let's talk about what's
Speaker 3: going on with the Massy race. His chances of winning
Speaker 3: the primary plunged suddenly yesterday on the eve of election day.
Speaker 3: Now again, when you spend, they had spent over ten
Speaker 3: million dollars the Zionist billionaires, and then all of a
Speaker 3: sudden last week they came up with a couple of
Speaker 3: lies and put those things out. As Thomas Massey said,
Speaker 3: you know, if you look at the demographics of people
Speaker 3: who are supporting Massy, it goes anywhere. If you look
Speaker 3: at the people fifty five and under, his support is
Speaker 3: plus seventeen to plus fifty six points, depending on the
Speaker 3: age bracket. If you look at those over fifty five,
Speaker 3: it goes from about plus seventeen about plus thirty five
Speaker 3: if I remember correctly. We'll get to that in a moment.
Speaker 3: Why is that? Is it because the people over fifty
Speaker 3: five don't really understand AI is because they don't understand politics,
Speaker 3: because they don't understand life. Yeah, this is I think
Speaker 3: what is really happening. I got to say, I think
Speaker 3: we need to understand what Maga really stands for, really
Speaker 3: stands for a multitude of asinine gullible Americans. We're going
Speaker 3: to find out today if that is a majority of asinine,
Speaker 3: gullible Americans. So Massey's chances took a sudden dip they
Speaker 3: did initially. With the lives about this staffer, they're out there,
Speaker 3: and as pointed out yesterday, Reason had a good article
Speaker 3: and we covered that yesterday. The self contradictory and improbable
Speaker 3: story of this woman made absolutely no sense, and she
Speaker 3: contradicted herself all the way through it, and we'll talk
Speaker 3: about that as well. But again, he took a deep
Speaker 3: he took a deep plunge, and many people took a
Speaker 3: look at it, and he came back up. But then
Speaker 3: you got war Pete. If ever there was a poster
Speaker 3: child for war and Zionism, that's war Pete. And of
Speaker 3: course he flies in parachutes, and I guess to support
Speaker 3: this trained seal, and I'm talking about not a navy seal.
Speaker 3: I'm talking about the mammal kind is a performing seal.
Speaker 3: And he's only got one trick, and that is he
Speaker 3: wants war more of it, and he wants it for Israel.
Speaker 3: So he's exactly like Warpete. The two of them are
Speaker 3: both trained seals. So when we look at other trained seals,
Speaker 3: we've got Dan Bongino crawling out of the woodwork like
Speaker 3: a cockroach. This is a guy who if anybody he
Speaker 3: looked at Thomas mass see any whatever happens to him,
Speaker 3: he has had integrity and credibility. He's stood with the Constitution,
Speaker 3: He's stood with morality. Bongino has none of those things.
Speaker 3: This is a guy who built his reputation on criticizing
Speaker 3: Epstein and what was happening with that stuff, and then
Speaker 3: became one of the key figures in the cover up.
Speaker 4: Difficult conversation for me because.
Speaker 2: I, yeah, it is because you're such a hypocrite. I did.
Speaker 2: I supported him. Yeah, for a while, even Epstein.
Speaker 4: You know him as President Trump butted heads been good
Speaker 4: on some issues. But I'm going to tell you some
Speaker 4: I have never been as disappointed in a human being
Speaker 4: in politics as I am in Tom Massey.
Speaker 3: Well, that's the way we feel about you, Dan Bongino.
Speaker 3: I've never been more disappointed. Well, I actually have with
Speaker 3: with Donald Trump, as Thomas Massey has said, Well, you
Speaker 3: want to say that I've opposed Trump on certain issues,
Speaker 3: he said, well, ninety one percent of the time I
Speaker 3: vote with the Republican.
Speaker 5: Congressman in the last two weeks as talking points at
Speaker 5: Azela and jas and Crockett has retweeted, you, when will
Speaker 5: you change your party affiliation in Democrats?
Speaker 2: Guy's voice is changing.
Speaker 6: I thought you knew. I vote with Republicans ninety one
Speaker 6: percent of the time.
Speaker 7: It's see in the nine percent.
Speaker 6: I don't they're taking up for pedophiles, starting another war
Speaker 6: or bankrupting our country.
Speaker 3: That's right, well we have As a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: he took a question and he responded, that's something Ed
Speaker 3: Gaweran can't do. As a matter of fact, I didn't
Speaker 3: put the video in the deck because it's all just visual.
Speaker 3: Nothing is being said. You got Ed Goweran at a
Speaker 3: public event and there's a guy there who is very
Speaker 3: well known as a retired military guy. I forget what
Speaker 3: his rank was. I got kind of caught up on
Speaker 3: the fact that he was a Kentucky colonel, and I thought,
Speaker 3: what is that. It's an honorary title in Kentucky for
Speaker 3: somebody who has a civilian title is not military at all,
Speaker 3: but it's done by the governor. So this is a
Speaker 3: known guy. And he quietly was walking up to ask
Speaker 3: ed gowerin some questions, and there's three guys who stand
Speaker 3: in front of him. I mean they're screening him like
Speaker 3: it's a basketball game. They stand in front of this
Speaker 3: guy who wanted to ask ed some questions with their
Speaker 3: hands folded, and then as ed moves off to the side,
Speaker 3: they move off to the side and stand there with
Speaker 3: their you know, backs to this guy and their hands
Speaker 3: folded in front of them.
Speaker 2: It's pretty amazing.
Speaker 7: I have the video if you want me to play,
Speaker 7: so you do.
Speaker 3: Yeah, let's go ahead and play it. I'll just kind
Speaker 3: of narrate it here. It's not it is not something
Speaker 3: that you can actually hear anything. Look at this the
Speaker 3: way these guys get in front of him. No, you're
Speaker 3: not going to get close to him. And they've actually
Speaker 3: got three guys that do this. Look at this how
Speaker 3: their shoulder to shoulder. Now they're walking. That guy in
Speaker 3: the gray is the one who wanted to ask him
Speaker 3: a question.
Speaker 2: They keep doing this. What is he afraid of?
Speaker 3: The bottom line is that this trained performing seal doesn't
Speaker 3: have anything to say about anything. That's why they like him,
Speaker 3: you know, That's what they do when they bring in
Speaker 3: outside money. We had here in Tennessee. We had Frank Nicely,
Speaker 3: a great senator here in Tennessee. I did so much
Speaker 3: to help people. He got Ibermacon over the counter. He
Speaker 3: did many things to try to help the government to
Speaker 3: set aside goal for the coming collapse of the currency.
Speaker 3: And he tried to stop outside money from coming into
Speaker 3: the state to support people. Well he lost on that one,
Speaker 3: and so the outside money came after him. They did
Speaker 3: the same stuff to him that they're going to Thomas Massey.
Speaker 3: And of course I've seen this before in the past,
Speaker 3: but I guess it opened up some fresh wounds after
Speaker 3: seeing what they did to Frank Nicely. And they put
Speaker 3: in a guy.
Speaker 2: His name was actually Seal Jesse Seal Seals.
Speaker 3: And so you have these trained seals that are picked
Speaker 3: up by the big money people. And you know, Frank
Speaker 3: Nicely was somebody who is rated in the high nineties
Speaker 3: by the John Birch Society in terms of freedom score
Speaker 3: and conservatism standing for the constitution, individual liberty, fiscal responsibility.
Speaker 3: And this guy is down in the low sixties. That's
Speaker 3: typical what you see these people doing. And I expect
Speaker 3: the same thing from the other trained seal, Ed Galleran
Speaker 3: No debate, no policy except war, war all the time,
Speaker 3: war everywhere, War for whatever Israel wants.
Speaker 2: So when you look at the.
Speaker 3: Articles, just like I talked about yesterday, the Independent, the
Speaker 3: UK Independent, they talked about all these differences over policy
Speaker 3: that Trump and Massy have had, and again Ed Golleran says, well, yeah,
Speaker 3: he's like Ronald Reagan. Know, he's exactly the opposite of
Speaker 3: Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan could tolerate dissent in the without
Speaker 3: turning on his own people. Not Donald Trump, not the
Speaker 3: narcissist in chief. And so when Newsweek starts to talk
Speaker 3: about the difference is the feud with Trump, they talk
Speaker 3: about everything except Zionism, which is the elephant in the room.
Speaker 3: Same thing that the so called Independent out of the
Speaker 3: UK did. It tells you everything you need to know
Speaker 3: about these news outlets. When I talk about Newsweek, I've
Speaker 3: always said, the way you spell week is w eak,
Speaker 3: it's not w ee k. Massey endorsed Trump in the
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four presidential election.
Speaker 2: They said, again.
Speaker 3: He got very got on Trump's wrong side back in
Speaker 3: twenty when he voted against the two trillion dollar COVID
Speaker 3: relief package and let's understand, if you look at the
Speaker 3: rate that we're accumulating massive debt. Trump put us on
Speaker 3: an entire new slope with that move. Biden maintained that,
Speaker 3: and so has Trump in this term, although he's starting
Speaker 3: to accelerate the slope. Again, Massey stood against that. And
Speaker 3: one of the things that he was accused of grand
Speaker 3: standing because he told the Congress and said, you're not
Speaker 3: going to vote by mail to do this, You're going
Speaker 3: to come in person to vote for this. And his intention,
Speaker 3: I think, was to show that the COVID pandemic nonsense
Speaker 3: was really hyped up fraud. And of course this was
Speaker 3: fraudulent as well, the COVID relief package. We see most
Speaker 3: of that money going to fraud and to billionaires, even
Speaker 3: the stuff that was supposedly earmarked for small businesses. So
Speaker 3: Trump called for him to be thrown out of the
Speaker 3: GOP at that point in time. Again, this is always
Speaker 3: what you see the people saying, well, he's grandstanding. And
Speaker 3: I find that the most incredible projection from all of
Speaker 3: these Trump supporters. How could they accuse anyone of grand
Speaker 3: standing when they if they were to look at Trump himself,
Speaker 3: the grandfather of grandstanding, so again, Massey was right to
Speaker 3: pose the fraud of COVID and the debt, and he's
Speaker 3: been right in all of these disagreements with Trump. He
Speaker 3: posed the president's foreign policy decisions as well. He supported
Speaker 3: a war powers resolution let's call the constitution, folks, that
Speaker 3: would curb Trump's ability to declare war on Iran. That's
Speaker 3: not in the Constitution. He also has broken with the
Speaker 3: president on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Let's understand,
Speaker 3: it's not a big beautiful act. It is a big,
Speaker 3: ugly debt that he put in there. And he said
Speaker 3: there's a lack of spending cuts in here, and so
Speaker 3: Trump accused him of being against tax cuts. Yeah, we're
Speaker 3: got to cut taxes, but we're going to raise spending
Speaker 3: from the guy who bankrupted six casinos, that's what he
Speaker 3: is talking about here. He criticized the administration's handling of
Speaker 3: Epstein documents, says Newsweek. No, it was not the handling,
Speaker 3: it was the cover up. And of course that's one
Speaker 3: of the big reasons why Bongino is so angry. He
Speaker 3: had to run out of Washington because he knew he
Speaker 3: was going to be facing all kinds of hearings impeachment, impeachment,
Speaker 3: but perjury traps that we're going to be there. He's
Speaker 3: either going to have to lie for Trump or he's
Speaker 3: going to have to grandstand and not show up. That's
Speaker 3: why he's angry. Trump said, well, this guy's an automatic no,
Speaker 3: no matter what he says. If we did welfare reform,
Speaker 3: if we did the greatest thing in history for religion,
Speaker 3: what is Trump going to do the greatest thing in
Speaker 3: history for religion? Jesus was critical of religion. It's not
Speaker 3: about religion, it's about relationship. Trump just can't get past
Speaker 3: the point of constantly comparing himself to Jesus. We see
Speaker 3: it every day, and you see his followers doing it
Speaker 3: every day, just like Eric Metaxas, and then when they're
Speaker 3: called out on Oh it was satire. It was a joke. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's a joke, like him wanting to be king. That's
Speaker 3: not a joke. We had here as we're talking about
Speaker 3: the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of people fighting against
Speaker 3: King George the Third for their freedom. Now we have
Speaker 3: to fight against King Trump the Third for our freedom.
Speaker 3: So it's this case of Cynthia West, who is out
Speaker 3: there the hush money just understand that it is her
Speaker 3: word against both Thomas Massey and Sparts who is the
Speaker 3: congressman Victoria Sparks of Indiana.
Speaker 7: And logic and time and logic.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and the timeline. None of it makes any sense. Again,
Speaker 3: this is after his wife died, unlike Trump, who doesn't
Speaker 3: wait for his wife to die before he starts finding
Speaker 3: other girlfriends, porn stars and stuff like that. This is
Speaker 3: somebody that Massey met who lived in Florida. He wanted
Speaker 3: her to move to DC. So he said, let me
Speaker 3: help you find a job with somebody in terms of staff,
Speaker 3: and he helped to get her a position in this
Speaker 3: other congressional office. And she said, well, I don't have
Speaker 3: any money because my husband, my ex husband, is not
Speaker 3: paying me alimony and support. So he loaned her ten
Speaker 3: thousand dollars. She gave back five thousand of it. And
Speaker 3: then she said, well, he tried to bribe me a
Speaker 3: five thousand dollars to be quiet and to stop the
Speaker 3: lawsuit that I had against the woman who hired her.
Speaker 3: The reality is she had a temporary contract for sixty days.
Speaker 3: They did not renew the contract. I wonder why, and
Speaker 3: so then she sued them and the Congressional office said, well,
Speaker 3: we'll offer you a settlement. She refused the settlement, which
Speaker 3: is far more than what she accused Massey of trying
Speaker 3: to bribe her with and the person that hired her.
Speaker 3: Victoria Sparks said in a statement, she said West was
Speaker 3: not fired, her office chose not to extend her temporary
Speaker 3: ninety day employment due to quote concerning conduct by missus West,
Speaker 3: adding that the complaint against her office came a few
Speaker 3: months later and she had denied this and refused to settle.
Speaker 3: So Massey said, it's a sad thing that a week
Speaker 3: before an election, people are making false, unsubstantiated allegations about me,
Speaker 3: an obvious attempt to influence the outcome of this election.
Speaker 3: And they're not just cooking up these false accusations, but
Speaker 3: they're matching it with five million dollars in just the
Speaker 3: last to run these additional ads that are lies and slender.
Speaker 3: So Victoria Sparts defended mass innerstatement. She said, he's one
Speaker 3: of the strongest supporters of women in Congress, a defender
Speaker 3: of women's rights among her GOP colleagues. Can't say that
Speaker 3: about Trump, can you? But again, this is newsweek w eak.
Speaker 3: They talk about everything except the elephant in the room,
Speaker 3: which is a PAC and the Zionist lobby. As a
Speaker 3: matter of fact.
Speaker 8: I introduced a bill called the APAC Act. You'll see
Speaker 8: this come up. Nobody knows this. I'm debuting it on
Speaker 8: your show right now, which would make a pack subject
Speaker 8: to Foreign Agent Registrations Act. For some reason, they're immune
Speaker 8: right now. And I think not just the money that's
Speaker 8: spent in politics, but the lobbying that happens on Capitol
Speaker 8: Hill should be reported. If it's a foreign country, whether
Speaker 8: it's Great Britain, absolutely he Cutter or Israel, it needs
Speaker 8: to be reported.
Speaker 9: And the amount of money that goes to these influencers,
Speaker 9: it's really interesting. They you'll you'll see them sort of
Speaker 9: all you know, publishing the same attacks online almost simultaneously,
Speaker 9: or whether they're talking point, they're all on the same
Speaker 9: page and it's like they're receiving talking points. They're trained
Speaker 9: seals clothes that they're receiving this money, right.
Speaker 2: Whether it's Jesse Seals or Navy seals.
Speaker 8: I've said this so many times, you know, in my
Speaker 8: sleep I think about it. I'm Thomas Massey and I
Speaker 8: proved this message. I'm Thomas Massey, and I proved this message.
Speaker 8: That's either at the front or the end of every
Speaker 8: commercial I do. And when I send out a piece
Speaker 8: of mail, it says who did it? And you know
Speaker 8: my campaign Thomas Massey for Congress, approved by Thomas Massey
Speaker 8: for Congress, paid by and we need that. I believe
Speaker 8: we should have that same sort of truth in advertising
Speaker 8: on social media, because if it's a good idea in
Speaker 8: the other outlets, it would be a good idea on
Speaker 8: social media, particularly because so much of it is foreign money.
Speaker 8: I remember all these complaints about election interference, fraudulent elections,
Speaker 8: and the Russians being involved and who else being involved
Speaker 8: in bots? Right, but really the elections are being influenced online.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they want you to be concerned about bots. They
Speaker 3: want to make sure that we don't have any anonymity
Speaker 3: or free speech on social media, But they don't want
Speaker 3: you to be concerned about the congressmen who've been bought.
Speaker 2: That's the reality.
Speaker 10: I cannot wait for May nineteen. It's going to be
Speaker 10: so great, you know.
Speaker 8: Just in case I lose, they gave me the number
Speaker 8: to call to concede.
Speaker 10: The area code is tel Aviv.
Speaker 3: Though well, I hope that works for him. You know,
Speaker 3: we've had situations. I remember when George Sorows was buying
Speaker 3: elections for district attorneys and even for state attorneys general,
Speaker 3: and typically the only people who were able to push
Speaker 3: back on that and win because he would drop in
Speaker 3: millions of dollars into these what have been really cheap
Speaker 3: local elections. The people were able to beat him back,
Speaker 3: but the people who called him out on it, you
Speaker 3: have to call out this outside money. These people have
Speaker 3: an agenda that is not the agenda of the people
Speaker 3: who are there. As a matter of fact, when you
Speaker 3: look at the agenda of both war Pete and Ed
Speaker 3: trained Seal rk Art, this is what the guy has
Speaker 3: to say. Yeah, look at that surprise A giddy Pete
Speaker 3: Hegseth drops in after Ed Gallerin promises to bring back
Speaker 3: the draft. I want war, I want war for Israel,
Speaker 3: and I want the draft back. That sounds like a
Speaker 3: winning combination, doesn't it. He certainly is not interested in
Speaker 3: the things that affect us personally, except for the fact
Speaker 3: that war impoverishes us and endangers our lives even here
Speaker 3: at home. We're not going to be immune from this.
Speaker 3: We have been in the past, but the technology is changing.
Speaker 3: What Massey is concerned about are things like Donald Trump
Speaker 3: giving legal immunity to companies that want to poison us
Speaker 3: and give us cancer like Bear with gleifas well.
Speaker 6: You know, I support obviously the First Amendment, Second Amendment,
Speaker 6: Fourth Amendment. The fourth Amendment is privacy, Tenth Amendment is
Speaker 6: States rights. But I also support.
Speaker 2: You think seventh can even say what those ambents are about.
Speaker 6: There amendments in the Bill of Rights that people have
Speaker 6: long since forgotten. What is the seventh Amendment? The right
Speaker 6: to a jury trial. They're trying to get immunity for
Speaker 6: data centers, for pesticides, for big tech when they steal
Speaker 6: inventions from little guys. They're trying to get all kinds
Speaker 6: of immunity and prevent jury trials. This is this is
Speaker 6: something that's not even on people's radar, but it has
Speaker 6: shown up on radar, and we've been successful and we
Speaker 6: got it struck from the Farm Bill. They were trying
Speaker 6: to put immunity for Glycus satan there, which is an herbicide.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and of course you got people like the Speaker
Speaker 3: of the House, the Republicans speak of the House famously
Speaker 3: saying we can't do search warrs. Can you imagine how
Speaker 3: long that would take us to do search warrs? Yeah,
Speaker 3: just like George the third right. So again hech Seth
Speaker 3: stumping for a candidate like this is a big break
Speaker 3: from what is normal. Well, now, a lot of people
Speaker 3: have said that it's a violation of the Hatch Act. Well,
Speaker 3: the Hatch Act, as I see it, is very subjective,
Speaker 3: but it doesn't look to me like it is a
Speaker 3: violation of the Hatch Act. It is a violation of norms.
Speaker 3: It is a violation of decorum. But of course, Pete,
Speaker 3: Hegseth is a walking violation of what is normal, what
Speaker 3: is decorum. He is a walking violation of what is Christian,
Speaker 3: as he calls himself a Christian nationalist. But nevertheless he
Speaker 3: accuses Thomas Massey of aiding America's enemies.
Speaker 2: Well, actually he is.
Speaker 3: He's not a aiding America's enemies, because America's enemies are
Speaker 3: Donald Trump and or Pete. They are the greatest enemies.
Speaker 3: They represent the greatest enemies. They represent the Zionist occupied government.
Speaker 3: They represent people who trash the constitution, who trash the
Speaker 3: domestic law, the internal rules of the Pentagon and international
Speaker 3: law and treaties and conventions on warfare. These are people
Speaker 3: who declare war themselves and defiance to the Constitution. These
Speaker 3: are people who kill survivors who are non combatants. These
Speaker 3: are people who start wars of aggression.
Speaker 2: Folks.
Speaker 3: They are literally traders and terrorists. What is a terrorist?
Speaker 3: A terrorist is somebody who uses violence or the threat
Speaker 3: of violence to achieve their political ends. Right, does that
Speaker 3: not describe the entire Trump administration? And Pete haig Seth
Speaker 3: is the lethality arm of that. Yeah, he's a terrorist.
Speaker 3: Heg Seth is a terrorist. You're a terrorist, a murderer,
Speaker 3: an immoral person in terms of what you've done. And
Speaker 3: they are also traitors to the Constitution. They swore to
Speaker 3: have hold it and they violated it on every opportunity.
Speaker 3: So makes that big SoundBite was he said, Well, if
Speaker 3: you're going to be against everything, that becomes an excuse
Speaker 3: for accomplishing nothing. Well, he may be right about that,
Speaker 3: because if you oppose everything that the district of Orwell
Speaker 3: is doing right now in Washington, you're likely to accomplish
Speaker 3: nothing because most of the people that are there are crooks. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I guess you should say lethality. Baby, that's real power, right,
Speaker 3: I have power to kill people. That's what I want
Speaker 3: you see Fox News as Laura Ingram maybe she's auditioning
Speaker 3: for a position in the Trump administration. Here she said,
Speaker 3: if Nassy is a true conservative, then why does everyone
Speaker 3: on the left want him to win? I just can't
Speaker 3: get out of this left right republican democrat. If the
Speaker 3: Democrats say something nice about him, he has to be bad.
Speaker 3: I mean, we can't even if the Democrats are opposing
Speaker 3: the war for purely partisan reason, we can't oppose the war.
Speaker 3: We can't do the right thing because the Democrats are
Speaker 3: doing it. That's what Laura Ingram wants you to think.
Speaker 3: That's what Fox News sells you. It's this, this, this
Speaker 3: Hegelian dialectic. You have to be with us or you're
Speaker 3: a terrorist type of thing. No, again, if you oppose war,
Speaker 3: if you oppose Trump's imposed austerity, that's what this inflation is.
Speaker 3: Trump has become a pain in the gas. Just look
Speaker 3: at the pump. And again, if you oppose that, then
Speaker 3: you must be with the Democrats. The Democrats may oppose
Speaker 3: it for purely partisan reason, but for purely partisan reasons,
Speaker 3: Laura Ingram says, you can't oppose it when Trump does
Speaker 3: something wrong again, just another suck up sycophant of Fox News.
Speaker 3: You spell that fau x as in faux news, who
Speaker 3: probably wants a position. And the Trump administration. Then National Review.
Speaker 3: It's kind of interesting because National Review went to war
Speaker 3: with John burd Society and the John Burt Society, and
Speaker 3: that was when William F. Buckley was there, heavily involved
Speaker 3: with the CIA. Buckley was he wrote novels about its
Speaker 3: rumored that he was with him, and of course they
Speaker 3: loved him on NPR, didn't they. But he hated the
Speaker 3: John Birt Society, people who loved the Constitution, people who
Speaker 3: would rank people according to their fidelity to the Constitution,
Speaker 3: their fidelity to economic stability, their fidelity to individual liberty.
Speaker 3: And of course Massey is ranked ninety nine, I believe
Speaker 3: by their rankings at the John Birch Society. But they
Speaker 3: threw out Joe Sobrand, who was their editor, really good editor,
Speaker 3: because he said, I don't think he was America.
Speaker 2: First.
Speaker 3: He said, I don't think we need to be giving
Speaker 3: money to Israel or anybody else. You know, he was
Speaker 3: a Pat Buchanan Conservative. He said you know, let's not
Speaker 3: have this overreaching American empire. That's not what this country
Speaker 3: was founded on. It's not in the interest of our country.
Speaker 3: It's not the interest of Americans to do this. This
Speaker 3: is a small cabala people in Washington who want this.
Speaker 3: And so they called him anti Semitic. It was as
Speaker 3: a matter of fact, you know what National Review did
Speaker 3: to Joe Sobrand when they kicked him off as editor,
Speaker 3: was the first time I saw the Israeli lobby come
Speaker 3: after somebody who didn't want them to have a blank
Speaker 3: check from the American taxpayer, coming after him with charges
Speaker 3: of being racist. He was not racist. And so National
Speaker 3: Review is doing it again. They're coming after Thomas Massey.
Speaker 3: They wrote an op ed piece a headline Thomas Massey
Speaker 3: deserves to lose. They said, it was coming from National Review.
Speaker 3: We have a lot of time for quirky goa to
Speaker 3: Loane libertarians, they said, but we prefer if they aren't
Speaker 3: noxious critics of Israel. Well, you know, I prefer my
Speaker 3: conservatives to be fans of America, not puppets of Israel.
Speaker 3: Like National Review. They discussed me and they called him.
Speaker 3: He said, he's pushing friends fringy toxic ideology.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: You cannot criticize Israel, especially at National Review. Just understand
Speaker 3: that National Review is not what it pretends to be.
Speaker 3: They went on to say in their op ed piece,
Speaker 3: it's telling that a pro Massy super pac is running
Speaker 3: an ad in the race that portrays the billionaire investor
Speaker 3: in anti Massy donor Paul Singer, billionaire who is Jewish,
Speaker 3: alongside a rainbow colored star of David. Well, it is telling.
Speaker 3: It's telling the truth because this guy in Israel has
Speaker 3: been one of the key pushers from the very beginning
Speaker 3: of this LGBT stuff. And he is a Zionist.
Speaker 2: Why not?
Speaker 3: But the Zionist star of David And by the way,
Speaker 3: that's not a Jewish symbol from Moses. That is a
Speaker 3: pagan symbol that was adopted by the Zionists when they
Speaker 3: began that movement back in the eighteen hundreds. So yeah,
Speaker 3: if you oppose war and Zionism, National Review says it
Speaker 3: is fringy, toxic ideology. Let me tell you, the National
Speaker 3: Review is toxic ideology, always pushing war. National Review is
Speaker 3: like Lindsey Graham. I remember their comment. It was pithy,
Speaker 3: but it was abhorrent. They said before the Iraq War,
Speaker 3: they said the US can and should reduce the Iraqi
Speaker 3: military to twisted metal?
Speaker 2: Why should we? Because Nannahu said so? Is that?
Speaker 7: Why?
Speaker 2: So?
Speaker 3: Again, Trump says Massy has to be thrown out of
Speaker 3: office for opposing him.
Speaker 2: He's sounding increasingly desperate, isn't he.
Speaker 11: I hope you're going to put him out of business tomorrow.
Speaker 11: I'm in the Oval office and we're in a fight
Speaker 11: against the worst congressman in the history of our Country's
Speaker 11: name is Thomas Massey. He's from Kentucky. I hope you're
Speaker 11: going to put him out of business tomorrow.
Speaker 1: He is so bad.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So he's worse than Adam Schiff, is he? He's
Speaker 3: worse than Nancy Pelosi. He's worse than Lindsey Graham. And
Speaker 3: I could go on and on and on. We got
Speaker 3: a long list about what is it? We got five
Speaker 3: hundred and thirty five of them. There's five hundred and
Speaker 3: thirty four names. I could run through. Every single one
Speaker 3: of them is abhorrent. This is the only guy that
Speaker 3: is there holding the line for the Constitution. But well,
Speaker 3: he noticed that Trump doesn't have any specific issues with
Speaker 3: how Massey has betrayed the Constitution or the American people,
Speaker 3: which Trump does continuously.
Speaker 7: Yes, Lance, he's the worst senator as far as Israel's concerned.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, what Trump cares about, that's right. So
Speaker 3: again he made some amazing statements.
Speaker 2: He said that.
Speaker 3: Matthew was in favor of the transgender mutilation of our children.
Speaker 2: You see, if you are a.
Speaker 3: Zionist billionaire like Paul Singer or Miriam Addelson or Donald Trump,
Speaker 3: Zionist billionaires have no trouble at all making up lies.
Speaker 3: They'll tell you to your face. There's an absolute lie
Speaker 3: that he is pushing transgender mutilation of children. And he
Speaker 3: said he voted against tax cuts. Now he voted because
Speaker 3: you cut taxes and you increased spending. At the same time,
Speaker 3: Massy said, you can tell that I'm ahead in the
Speaker 3: polls and they're desperate. That's why they're sending the Secretary
Speaker 3: of War to my district tomorrow. He said that on Sunday.
Speaker 3: But apparently it looks like it's working. At least one
Speaker 3: thing they're doing is they are putting out a narrative
Speaker 3: which if you look at the malleability of the mainstream
Speaker 3: media and their polls, maybe that's their game. Maybe they're
Speaker 3: going to show that it's close and that ED is
Speaker 3: slightly ahead, and then they can pull their usual game
Speaker 3: of rigging the election and make it believable. They have
Speaker 3: to do that. They have to get it close, because
Speaker 3: then they can rig it. By the way, folks, this
Speaker 3: is bigger than Trump versus a constitution. Even it's a
Speaker 3: reference on whether we're going to be a Zionist occupied
Speaker 3: in government, are we going to be controlled by a
Speaker 3: foreign country. This is a referendum on Zog, and Zog
Speaker 3: knows it. Trump's tirade against a GOP senator who sponsored
Speaker 3: the stock trading band gets a second look a year later.
Speaker 3: You know, we've seen this massive corruption, in your face
Speaker 3: corruption from this crook Trump, thirty seven hundred trades in
Speaker 3: one quarter. You talk about somebody who is always chickening out,
Speaker 3: who can't make up his mind whether it's about tariffs
Speaker 3: or stocks that he should own and at what price.
Speaker 3: Less when you look at this, there was a massive
Speaker 3: blow up a year ago by Trump against Josh Holly,
Speaker 3: and what he wanted to do was he wanted to
Speaker 3: put some teeth into the insider trading prohibitions. Again, when
Speaker 3: that first came out, it was called the Pelosi Act
Speaker 3: because everybody knew Nancy Pelosi was doing it incredibly corrupt.
Speaker 3: And of course Republicans have talked about this a great deal,
Speaker 3: but not when it is their beloved leader who is
Speaker 3: doing it, even more so than Nancy Pelosi. And so
Speaker 3: it did change. The Pelosi Act. That was kind of
Speaker 3: the nickname they gave it, but actually Josh Holly put
Speaker 3: out one. He actually called it the Pelosi Act. He
Speaker 3: came up with an acronym that spelled out Pelosi. It
Speaker 3: was let's see if I can find it here. It
Speaker 3: was preventing elected leaders from owning securities and investments Pelosi Act. Well,
Speaker 3: Trump got really upset about it. Why because unlike the
Speaker 3: original Policy Act, this pulled in the president and the
Speaker 3: Vice president. And even though he got furious with Josh
Speaker 3: Holly about that, and Josh Holly put in a disclaimer
Speaker 3: saying it will not apply to anybody who's already been elected. Right, well,
Speaker 3: that's a way of grandfathering in all of the you know,
Speaker 3: five hundred plus crooks that are in the district of
Speaker 3: criminals right now.
Speaker 7: Trump, only way you're going to get something like this
Speaker 7: past let's prevent all future corruption for the people that
Speaker 7: aren't in office yet.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we'll make it unattractive for people to want my job.
Speaker 3: You think you're going to take my job and you're
Speaker 3: gonna make a become a billionaire with insider trading, and
Speaker 3: we'll make again pal.
Speaker 7: I just it's sort or at least a better version
Speaker 7: of the typical politician strategy of cutting the runs off.
Speaker 7: The last are below you, so people should follow you.
Speaker 7: It's cutting the rungs off the corruption letter.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: So Trump in the last quarter did thirty seven hundred trades,
Speaker 3: that's forty trades a day, and the people are in
Speaker 3: the business say, I don't understand what's going on with
Speaker 3: I mean, it looks like some kind of a hedge
Speaker 3: fund with an algorithm that's doing this kind of stuff.
Speaker 3: It absolutely makes no sense as unprecedented anyway, The President
Speaker 3: himself had called for congressional stock trading, but then he
Speaker 3: objected when Holly's bill would have applied to him as well.
Speaker 3: Even though Holly had secured a de facto exemption for Trump,
Speaker 3: it still wasn't enough, and so he put him on blast.
Speaker 3: As some people said, he came after Josh Holly. He said,
Speaker 3: Democrats have been trying to target me for a long
Speaker 3: period of time, basically saying, you know, I'm an inside
Speaker 3: trader crook, and this is directed at me.
Speaker 2: I resemble that remark. Anyway.
Speaker 3: They said they're using Josh Holly, who I got elected
Speaker 3: twice as a pond to help them. He is just
Speaker 3: a second tier senator. He said, Yeah, this is the
Speaker 3: childish trash talking of Donald Trump. What about Ronald Reagan's
Speaker 3: eleventh commandment, thou shalt do insider trade? No is that
Speaker 3: thou shalt not speak able of other Republicans, But he
Speaker 3: does all the time. NBC News commented on at the time.
Speaker 3: They said, the tensions between Holly and a Republican leader
Speaker 3: reached a boiling point. Yeah, and then you had Ran Paul,
Speaker 3: who is an opponent of stock trading bands. He granted
Speaker 3: Holly the opportunity to mark up his bill, and I
Speaker 3: don't understand why ram Paul would oppose that. It is well,
Speaker 3: I do understand that what ram Paul did during the
Speaker 3: COVID thing, and I've called him out on it in
Speaker 3: the past. During COVID, ram Paul had his wife by
Speaker 3: stock in Gilead. That made rim dozeverr was that an
Speaker 3: insider trading looks like it to me, looks like it
Speaker 3: to me, it looks like exactly the same thing that
Speaker 3: Nancy Pelosi did with her husband. And of course you
Speaker 3: have somebody who basically set up a social media account
Speaker 3: that followed the trades of Nancy Pelosi's husband said, you
Speaker 3: want to become a millionaire, just binds all the stocks
Speaker 3: that she has her husband by. So anyway, Holly and
Speaker 3: the Democrat that he worked with reached a compromise. They
Speaker 3: would rename this and change the name away from Pelosi.
Speaker 3: It would no longer be called the Pelosi Act. And
Speaker 3: then the compromise was that the band would not apply
Speaker 3: to anybody who is already elected and to protect Donald Trump. Nevertheless,
Speaker 3: Trump still lashed out, Trump doesn't love America, folks. He
Speaker 3: loves money, and the love of money is the root
Speaker 3: of all evil, especially the root of Trump's evil. He
Speaker 3: is a Zog puppet and prostitute. So Thomas of Massy
Speaker 3: versus Israeli lobby, He says, I'm walking to an airplane
Speaker 3: to rejoin the most expensive congressional race in the US history.
Speaker 3: It's turned into a referendum on whether Israel gets to
Speaker 3: buy seats in Congress. That's exactly what it is. This
Speaker 3: is not Massy versus Trump. This is Massy versus a
Speaker 3: foreign government controlling our Congress. So what they found out
Speaker 3: is that my seat is really expensive. Well, they've got
Speaker 3: the money for it. It already spent a record amount,
Speaker 3: and then they increased it by fifty percent, just as
Speaker 3: last week to really push these slanderous lies that they
Speaker 3: concocted in the final days of the campaign. That isn't
Speaker 3: a tell what is he says the Republican Jewish Coalition Apak,
Speaker 3: Miriam Addelson and Paul Singer are all part of the
Speaker 3: Israeli lobby and that's where all the money comes from.
Speaker 3: For my opponent, Massey told the ABC News George Stephanopfolis
Speaker 3: on Sunday, said it'll be a referendum on foreign policy
Speaker 3: whether Israel gets to dictate foreign policy by buying and
Speaker 3: bullying members of Congress. I'm the one they haven't been
Speaker 3: able to bully, so they're putting all of the brunt
Speaker 3: the force on me. I'm ahead of the polls and
Speaker 3: they're desperate. They're sending the Secretary word to my district tomorrow.
Speaker 2: That's seth.
Speaker 3: That's why APAK has dumped another three million dollars into
Speaker 3: the race just this weekend. So of the additional five
Speaker 3: million that got dumped in in the last week, three
Speaker 3: million of the five was coming in from APAK. After
Speaker 3: months of beating around the bush, one reporter finally said,
Speaker 3: writes the true story of my race. When asked, says
Speaker 3: Thomas Massey and the lobbyist are bragging about it, bragging
Speaker 3: about the fact that they're going to take him out
Speaker 3: in the same way that Levin said, we got rid
Speaker 3: of Pat Buchanan. We can cancel people. We can cancel
Speaker 3: whoever opposes us, whoever stops us from ripping off the
Speaker 3: American people and sending them to war Israel has the
Speaker 3: power to take them out.
Speaker 2: Think about that. It makes me damn angry.
Speaker 3: I hate to see my government taken over by a
Speaker 3: bunch of crooks and criminals who sell out to a
Speaker 3: foreign country. You are traders, and you have become terrorists
Speaker 3: for a terrorist nation, Israel. Republican Jewish Coalition director said
Speaker 3: he expects we That's the way he put it, That
Speaker 3: is the RJC to win. He does not say that
Speaker 3: he expects Ed to win. That's because Ed is their
Speaker 3: puppet and they are running his race. That's what Thomas
Speaker 3: Massey said, and he's absolutely right. Here's the head of
Speaker 3: the Republican Jewish Coalition telling a Chabbad gathering that he
Speaker 3: spent a lot of time talking to Benjamin Netanyahu about
Speaker 3: the existential threat of the Israeli critical right, Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: Traders to their country, absolutely literally, just like Jonathan Pollard,
Speaker 3: they are traders to America. That's the Republican Jewish Coalition,
Speaker 3: apak the lot of them. Massew's opponent, Ed Galleran is
Speaker 3: an empty suit with zero charisma, writes some Information Liberation.
Speaker 3: Ed Gallerin says people who vote for him because of
Speaker 3: his should vote for him because of his top secret record,
Speaker 3: which Trump has seen, but he can't tell you about it.
Speaker 3: He'd have to kill you. You know how many times
Speaker 3: we see this. I abhor the national security state. It
Speaker 3: is at the center of everything that has gone wrong
Speaker 3: with this country after World War Two. Whenever they do
Speaker 3: something criminal, they keep it secret, and they do it
Speaker 3: in the name of national security.
Speaker 7: Yes, I can play that forty Go ahead and play that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, without missing a lick.
Speaker 12: He turned to me and he goes it. He says,
Speaker 12: I want you to go home, you talk to your family,
Speaker 12: you pray on this, and you think about it. I'm
Speaker 12: gonna endorse you in life, in whatever you do. You
Speaker 12: know why he said that, Remember that top secret record.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right knows me top secret. He knows everything about me.
Speaker 2: We do two pal He knows it's no secret who's
Speaker 2: running you.
Speaker 12: He knows what I'll do for you in Washington. I'll
Speaker 12: be your champion.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm a mercenary.
Speaker 12: Serve our party. I'll serve our nation, asking for your boat.
Speaker 12: I'll be here for further questions. I'll answer the ones
Speaker 12: I've gone too long. I almost share one last thing
Speaker 12: about this picture if I could. Of course, I'm most
Speaker 12: proud of this one back here moving hey as that's
Speaker 12: two seasons. I'm proud of her.
Speaker 2: Hey well.
Speaker 3: As Information Liberation point out and said, the GP mocked
Speaker 3: Biden for riding in his basement during the twenty twenty
Speaker 3: election against Trump, Galleran has followed exactly the same playbook,
Speaker 3: and he's let the Israeli lobby spend millions to campaign
Speaker 3: for him.
Speaker 2: I would say, to lie for him. He had.
Speaker 3: Ken Klippenstein said, I went through all of Ed Galleran's interviews.
Speaker 3: This guy is laughably deep state. He literally says his
Speaker 3: background is classified. He cites anonymous endorsements from unnamed national
Speaker 3: security officials, and he also goes on to say he's
Speaker 3: made a fool of himself every time he opens his mouth.
Speaker 3: Asked about the Iran War, he replied, the President is
Speaker 3: playing five D chess. Remember I talked about that yesterday.
Speaker 3: Actually it's the five D is actually five dollars gas that.
Speaker 7: Getting amazingly, this is a different clip than the one
Speaker 7: we played yesterday, where I guess he's saying that he's
Speaker 7: playing five D chess.
Speaker 1: Again.
Speaker 7: It's twenty seven seconds. If you want me to play it.
Speaker 2: I know that's okay.
Speaker 3: I can only take so much of Ed Gallery, Mark
Speaker 3: Levin and Lindsey Graham in a day. So again he
Speaker 3: says he's resetting the entire global power structure. So let
Speaker 3: him work through that. Yeah, that's right. Just trust him,
Speaker 3: That's what he said, trust the plan. The contrast could
Speaker 3: not be more stark. Elderly voters in Massy's district, according
Speaker 3: to polling, are ready to throw out the finest member
Speaker 3: of Congress because Trump and some TV ads told them to.
Speaker 3: And as Massy and others have pointed out, perhaps the
Speaker 3: reason for the generational split here.
Speaker 2: As I said before, ages.
Speaker 3: Seventeen to fifty five, Massy leads by anywhere from seventeen
Speaker 3: to fifty six points. When you look at fifty six
Speaker 3: years old and up, Gallerin leads anywhere from eighteen to
Speaker 3: thirty three points.
Speaker 7: I think mostly a matter of where you get your
Speaker 7: news from.
Speaker 2: You know, that's a good point.
Speaker 7: Older people still watch Fox News and all that versus
Speaker 7: people that actually get their information from the Internet. And
Speaker 7: see all the complaints about the NonStop ads that Apak
Speaker 7: is buying on.
Speaker 3: Those Well, you see on the internet, you see the
Speaker 3: back and forth debate that is happening there as free speech.
Speaker 3: This is why they want to shut it down, which
Speaker 3: is why Israel has bumped up there has gone up
Speaker 3: by a factor of one hundred in terms of their
Speaker 3: spending on propaganda since they began their genocide and Gaza.
Speaker 3: And again they will not say why it's not genocide.
Speaker 3: They will just call you anti Semitic if you call
Speaker 3: it genocide. You know, the term genocide was coined by
Speaker 3: a Jew. His name was Limkin, and he was talking
Speaker 3: about what the Turks did to the Armenian Christians. What
Speaker 3: was it that they did. They tried to kill enough
Speaker 3: of them to drive out the survivors because they wanted
Speaker 3: their land. Is that not the policy of Israel and Gaza?
Speaker 3: And of course attacking and killing civilians so you can
Speaker 3: drive them out of their land because you want it.
Speaker 3: That's precisely what it is in regardless of what happens.
Speaker 3: Massey has shown incredible integrity throughout his time in Congress,
Speaker 3: and his fundraising abilities are truly remarkable, says Information Liberation
Speaker 3: right about that. But again, when you look at the
Speaker 3: lives that are put out by the people in the
Speaker 3: last week, you know, there's threesome with AOC and ilhan
Speaker 3: Omar is something that they put I don't even know.
Speaker 3: But as he pointed out, he said, older voters who
Speaker 3: don't know that how AI works look at that and
Speaker 3: they think it's actually me going on a date with
Speaker 3: AOC and ilhan Omar and then checking into a hotel together.
Speaker 3: That's how childish this stuff was. But I think you're right, Lance,
Speaker 3: I think it really is where they get their news,
Speaker 3: they get off of Fox News. They listen to people
Speaker 3: like Laura Ingram, who says, well, if a Democrat has
Speaker 3: something nice to say about I mean, you know, Trump
Speaker 3: is going to cover up the Epstein documents, and Massey
Speaker 3: worked with a Democrat to get them released.
Speaker 2: So Massy must be bad.
Speaker 3: Not the Epstein information, not the Epstein elites, not Donald Trump. No,
Speaker 3: it's the fact that he worked with Democrats to try
Speaker 3: to get this information released that makes him bad. That's
Speaker 3: the juvenile understanding of what's going on being pushed to
Speaker 3: these people by Laura Ingram and her Ilk imploring voters
Speaker 3: to say no to woke Eddie Gilrane and his billionaire
Speaker 3: club of LGBT weirdos. He said, well, again, what will
Speaker 3: happen is if Trump wins, you'll see him dancing to
Speaker 3: the gay national anthem from one of those guys, and
Speaker 3: he will be laughing up his sleeve at the MAGA
Speaker 3: people who think that he's anti LGBT. Again, last week
Speaker 3: he said, we saw a money bomb. We raised one
Speaker 3: point three million dollars for Massey from thousands of small donors.
Speaker 3: This is Clint Russell writing this. The very next day,
Speaker 3: Miriam Addelson signed a check for the same amount one
Speaker 3: point three million dollars. Our is really donor right, not
Speaker 3: r but one is rarely donor offset thousands of American
Speaker 3: voices because Massey forced the Epstein files. Well you know
Speaker 3: what can we say about Miriam? Well, Donald Trump said
Speaker 3: it all, Miriy.
Speaker 13: You and Sheldon created a lot of relationship over the
Speaker 13: years with politicians at the state level, especially at the
Speaker 13: federal level. I want you to share with everyone, why
Speaker 13: is it so important? And how do you do it? Again,
Speaker 13: writing chu is part of it, but there is more
Speaker 13: than writing just checks.
Speaker 2: So how do you do it?
Speaker 3: Can you allow me not to answer? I don't want
Speaker 3: to say, but I'm really doing to America. And of
Speaker 3: course Donald Trump was at a meeting with her and
Speaker 3: he said, yeah, you know she I don't know. I
Speaker 3: think she loves Israel more than she loves the US.
Speaker 3: Who do you love more? She wouldn't say, right, And
Speaker 3: so it says everything, doesn't it. Her silence speaks very loudly.
Speaker 3: Thomas Massey's introduced this bill, the APAC bill that he
Speaker 3: was talking about earlier. As a matter of fact, as
Speaker 3: I said at the beginning of the program, when you
Speaker 3: look at the people who stand against outside money. Whether
Speaker 3: it's Joe Sobrand, whether it's Frank Nicely, whether it's Thomas Massey.
Speaker 3: They always come after them with a vengeance. And you
Speaker 3: can't get any more outside than a bunch of Zionist billionaires.
Speaker 3: Like I said before, they're outside of the country, not
Speaker 3: just outside the state. They're outside of the constitution, they
Speaker 3: are outside of morality.
Speaker 2: They're the true outsiders.
Speaker 3: So he wants to amend the APAC Act, the Foreign Registrate,
Speaker 3: he calls it. The APAC Aact is to amend the
Speaker 3: Foreign Registration Act of nineteen thirty eight in order to
Speaker 3: clarify the definition of foreign principle and to ensure transparency
Speaker 3: and lobbying on behalf of foreign interests. As he said before,
Speaker 3: I have to say after every the beginning or the
Speaker 3: end of every commercial, I got to say, I'm Thomas Massey,
Speaker 3: and I approve this message. They don't want you to
Speaker 3: know who's funding these messages. Since its inception in nineteen
Speaker 3: fifty four, APAC has circumvented the registration requirements under Pharaoh
Speaker 3: by virtue of being established as a domestic lobbying organization
Speaker 3: legally distinct from the parameters that the Act defined. Again,
Speaker 3: when we look at it. If you say this is
Speaker 3: just a domestic organization, you could essentially say that about
Speaker 3: all the K Street lobbyists, Well, you know they live
Speaker 3: in America, this is where they work and so forth.
Speaker 3: That doesn't mean that they're not agents for a foreign country.
Speaker 3: A pack was created by Isaiah Kinnan. He was a
Speaker 3: lobbyist for the Israeli government. He had previously served under
Speaker 3: the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. He worked as an
Speaker 3: information director of the American Zionist Council. After he raised
Speaker 3: sixty five million and seventy three million in the US
Speaker 3: aid for Israel in nineteen fifty one and fifty two, folks,
Speaker 3: that was huge. And multiply this by the declining amount
Speaker 3: of a dollar, and you're getting up into hundreds of
Speaker 3: millions or maybe even billions of dollars. So he was
Speaker 3: getting worried that the State Department was going to come
Speaker 3: after him to because he wasn't registered as a foreign
Speaker 3: agent under Pharaoh. And again he'd been a lobbyist for
Speaker 3: the Israeli government. He'd worked for their Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Speaker 3: He raised between sixty five and seventy three million dollars
Speaker 3: for them in the early nineteen fifties, he was by
Speaker 3: every reasonable definition, a foreign agent, but in order to
Speaker 3: escape that, he created the American Zionist Committee for Public
Speaker 3: Affairs to navigate around the registration requirements under PHARAH. In
Speaker 3: response to that concern, then they renamed that the American
Speaker 3: Israel Public Relations sorry Public Affairs Committee. In nineteen fifty
Speaker 3: nine APAC and again the APAC Act would amend this
Speaker 3: Pharaoh legislation by adding a fourth paragraph saying, additionally, define
Speaker 3: a foreign principle as any organization, association, corporation, or other
Speaker 3: entity his lobbying activities or state admissions is either holy
Speaker 3: or in part to influence US public policy or government
Speaker 3: action and furtherance of the political or economic interests of
Speaker 3: a foreign country or recognized state affiliated political entity. It
Speaker 3: also establish indicators for determining the foreign political alignment of
Speaker 3: lobbying firms and allow American citizens to file complaints with
Speaker 3: the US Department of Justice to request investigations into potential
Speaker 3: fair violations. Because we know the Trumpet Department Justice isn't
Speaker 3: going to initiate anything against APAC, So for some reason,
Speaker 3: he said they're immune right now, And I think it's
Speaker 3: not just the money that's spent in politics, but it's
Speaker 3: the lobbying that it's happening on Capitol Hill that should
Speaker 3: be reported. If it's a foreign country, whether it's Great Britain, Australia,
Speaker 3: Turkey Cutter, or Israel, it needs to be reported and
Speaker 3: we need to have more transparency. And so right now,
Speaker 3: here's the situation, folks. Eighty members of Congress, fifteen percent
Speaker 3: of Congress list a pack as they're all time top contributor.
Speaker 3: Think about that fifteen percent of Congress gets more money
Speaker 3: from APAK than from any other special interest group. Isn't
Speaker 3: that amazing? I find that to be abhorrent, quite frankly.
Speaker 3: But you know, of course Trump bragged about that he
Speaker 3: thought that Congress should be owned by Israel.
Speaker 14: Remember this, well, you know the biggest change I've seen
Speaker 14: in Congress is Israel literally owned Congress. You understand that
Speaker 14: ten years ago, fifteen years ago, and it was so powerful,
Speaker 14: it was so powerful, and today it's almost the opposite.
Speaker 14: You have between AOC and Omar and these people that
Speaker 14: hate Israel, they hate it with a passion. They're controlling
Speaker 14: Congress and Israel is not a force in Congress anymore.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just you.
Speaker 3: Need to give me money I've never seen. I'll do
Speaker 3: it for you. It's a sales BIS.
Speaker 14: Talking about over a very long period of time. But
Speaker 14: I think you know exactly what I what I'm saying.
Speaker 14: They had such power, Israel had such power and rightfully
Speaker 14: over Congress. And it doesn't actually hire me.
Speaker 2: I'll be I'm your boy. What Yeah, let's think colonel.
Speaker 15: President Trump unleashed Prime Minister Nettignado, netting Yahoo to resume
Speaker 15: genocide in Gaza, which unfortunately resulted, I say unfortunately it
Speaker 15: was intentional, the killing of four hundred civilians in the
Speaker 15: past two days.
Speaker 1: I don't think he has any choice. I think when
Speaker 1: he ran for office, he made certain agreements with major donors.
Speaker 1: These donors are moved far beyond just Miriam Addison, and
Speaker 1: these donors oblige him to effectively underwrite whatever mister Netanyahu
Speaker 1: wants to do. I thought, I thought it was interesting
Speaker 1: that in a recent meeting was set up for the
Speaker 1: United States with Zerba John to talk about cooperation with Israel. Well,
Speaker 1: but it was set up by mister Datanyahu. He called
Speaker 1: and made the arrangements with mister Aliev, who's the president
Speaker 1: of Azerba Jahan. The State Department did not do it.
Speaker 1: I think we're very much in the grip of the
Speaker 1: Israel lobby, and I think President Trump is obliged to
Speaker 1: go along, and I don't see any evidence that he's
Speaker 1: going to diverge from that path.
Speaker 15: Does he have no choice but to back up Israel
Speaker 15: militarily when it attacks Earon?
Speaker 1: I think so. And keep in mind, you always have
Speaker 1: the possibility that a war is precipitated somehow by Israel
Speaker 1: somewhere in the region with Iran. The Iranians respond, and
Speaker 1: the expectation is with the build up of force in
Speaker 1: the region, you know, we're sending additional carrier battle groups
Speaker 1: over there right now. The expectation is that we will
Speaker 1: reinforce whatever the Israelis want to do. We've already done
Speaker 1: all of the planning for joint strikes, joint strike packages.
Speaker 3: Yeah, if they want to kill all the people in Lebanon,
Speaker 3: you know, there's nothing that we can do about it.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: Are we worried that Lebanon is creating a nuclear weapon? No,
Speaker 3: it's because Israel wants their land. They're genocidal terrorists. The
Speaker 3: stranglehold that the pro Israel lobby has over the American
Speaker 3: political system is clear, as the APAC Act currently only
Speaker 3: has a two percent chance of passing following US referral
Speaker 3: to the House Committee. Think about that, You've got fifteen
Speaker 3: percent of Congress lists APAK as their biggest donor, and
Speaker 3: you've only got a two percent chance of requiring them
Speaker 3: to register as foreign agents, when in reality we know
Speaker 3: they all are. This is what we mean by Zionists
Speaker 3: occupied government. Bobert is now in the cross Harris for
Speaker 3: supporting Massy and again as National not National Review, but
Speaker 3: the New American John Birch Society points out she has
Speaker 3: a ninety three percent score on the New American's Freedom Index.
Speaker 3: One by one, Trump, the New York Democrat, is driving
Speaker 3: out everybody who's ever voted for conservative principles and got
Speaker 3: to get them out, and you got to get out
Speaker 3: anybody that's not owned by Israel. She said, I knew
Speaker 3: the risk when I agreed to stand by my friend
Speaker 3: Thomas Massey, and she knows that it's going to be,
Speaker 3: you know.
Speaker 2: What they need to have at.
Speaker 3: This reflecting pool where Trump is so focused on right now.
Speaker 3: And of course there was a contract that was out
Speaker 3: showing that you know this this massive increase that went
Speaker 3: up by a factor of ten in terms of I
Speaker 3: think it's seven. Actually went from like a one point
Speaker 3: seven million to over thirteen millions, so it's like a
Speaker 3: factor of seven. But the reality is is that that
Speaker 3: was the original price. It's just that Trump lied to
Speaker 3: people to get this thing started, and he is so
Speaker 3: focused on this reflecting pool. Isn't that appropriate for somebody
Speaker 3: who is such a narcissist. It goes back to the
Speaker 3: Greek legend of who is so focused on his reflection
Speaker 3: in the pool. They should make a golden statue of
Speaker 3: Trump on his hands and knees, staring at his face
Speaker 3: in the reflecting pool. I think that'd be a perfect
Speaker 3: reflection of the man. Well, before we take a break,
Speaker 3: we've got some comments here self. Patriot, thank you very
Speaker 3: much for the tip, He says, I don't pray as
Speaker 3: often for our politicians as I should, unless it's for
Speaker 3: God to protect us from them and their actions. I've
Speaker 3: been praying for Thomas Massey and those others who stand
Speaker 3: for the Constitution absolutely right whenever I whenever I hear
Speaker 3: somebody quote that, you know, pray for your leaders and
Speaker 3: those in authority that you might live quite in peaceful
Speaker 3: lives and that type of thing. It's like, yeah, bra
Speaker 3: they leave us alone. That was basically paraphrased. And the
Speaker 3: Fiddler on the roof and they asked the brad By,
Speaker 3: They said, is there a prayer for the czar? And yes,
Speaker 3: God bless and keep the tzar far away from us.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 3: Trump wants to be a king and tzar is just
Speaker 3: another term for that comes from Caesar. You know, we
Speaker 3: had all these different terms Caesar czar.
Speaker 2: He had uh, let's see what was the other one
Speaker 2: that was out there.
Speaker 3: All all of these different uh tsar in Russia as
Speaker 3: well as all these other they're just it's just a dictator,
Speaker 3: just another king. Con think, thank you for the tip.
Speaker 2: He says.
Speaker 3: I think people like Massy. Uh, they keep people like
Speaker 3: Massy Brown, so we can imagine that we have a
Speaker 3: bloodless revolt against the deep state. Yeah, I don't think. Uh,
Speaker 3: you know, when you when you look at this again,
Speaker 3: one guy, Haig Ceth was right. You know, you can't
Speaker 3: have one guy really get anything done. That's what they
Speaker 3: always said about Ron Paul. He stuck to his principles,
Speaker 3: and they said, Linky doesn't get anything passed. It's like,
Speaker 3: that's because the rest of you are such crooks and
Speaker 3: because you violate the Constitution all the time, you're the problem,
Speaker 3: not Ron Paul and not Thomas Massey. But yeah, that's reality.
Speaker 3: And that's one thing. One time that Pete Haig says
Speaker 3: told the truth, and we should remember that because he
Speaker 3: doesn't usually tell the truth. This guy who is a
Speaker 3: high school football coach want to be the way he
Speaker 3: conducts the Pentagon, it's ridiculous.
Speaker 7: Right in the middle of this big, great reset and
Speaker 7: he's getting in the way of everything. He's letting us
Speaker 7: tack foreign countries.
Speaker 3: Or yeah, that's right. Yeah, we need that great reset,
Speaker 3: don't we. And we need to trust them. I keep
Speaker 3: hearing this all the time. You know, we had Telsea
Speaker 3: gabbergs that my role here is to restore trust in
Speaker 3: the intelligence community. Don't ever trust the intelligence community. RFK
Speaker 3: Junior says, my role here is to restore trust in
Speaker 3: public health. Don't ever trust public health. These are two
Speaker 3: functions that the government should not be involved in. Quite frankly,
Speaker 3: don't trust them either. G Talent sixty says MASSI will
Speaker 3: win today unless the implement the usual election chicanery, and
Speaker 3: we're going to talk a little bit about that as well.
Speaker 3: The election chicanery, folks, typically starts way before voting dayn Bureau,
Speaker 3: twenty twenty nine. The man who is pessimistic before forty
Speaker 3: eight knows too much. If he's an optimist after that,
Speaker 3: he knows too little. That's right, high boost. If Massy wins,
Speaker 3: it is a massive blow to BBI, Trump, MAGA and Israel.
Speaker 3: Let's go. I certainly do hope that he wins, but
Speaker 3: we'll see. Nebureau, twenty twenty nine. The Clinton's played their
Speaker 3: trump card in twenty fifteen to ensure the Republican Party's
Speaker 3: total destruction. That's right, we h as Julian Sege said,
Speaker 3: he said, well, we know the Hillary Clinton is a
Speaker 3: criminal and a warmonger, war crime monger. We don't know
Speaker 3: what Donald Trump is. Well, he found out, didn't he.
Speaker 3: The Trump administration did their best to kill him, put
Speaker 3: him in jail for many years, and then locked up
Speaker 3: the rest of us with a lockdown, and led the
Speaker 3: global charge into the COVID fraud as well as the
Speaker 3: bioweapon he funded. Jerry al Atalo says, what oversight do
Speaker 3: you think Kentucky state lawmakers should have over data centers. Yeah,
Speaker 3: so the first version of the Big Bill had a
Speaker 3: provision that would let data centers ignore state laws.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: This is again Donald Trump and his precedent of attacking
Speaker 3: the Tenth Amendment. This is the usual strategy of big business.
Speaker 3: They did it with the Dark Act, if you remember,
Speaker 3: and that revolved around Glifast and also de Canberra Drift.
Speaker 3: They were losing in local elections big time, go into
Speaker 3: even into county areas. They spent eight million dollars in
Speaker 3: one county area because they wanted to make sure that
Speaker 3: glyphysset was not being outlawed. And there are a lot
Speaker 3: of farmers who knew what the real issue was. They
Speaker 3: knew this poison drifted onto their land so they wouldn't
Speaker 3: be able to raise organic stuff. And so it didn't
Speaker 3: matter that Monsanto spent eight million dollars. They still lost.
Speaker 3: So Monsanto goes to the Obama administration. Oh, now we
Speaker 3: can talk about how it's bad because it was Obama.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: They go to the Bomba administration and they say, we
Speaker 3: need to be protected against this patchwork quilt of regulations
Speaker 3: from different states. Well, that was what the design of
Speaker 3: this country was about separation of power. So you know,
Speaker 3: we're going to have one set of rules. We want
Speaker 3: you to make those rules that will apply nationally so
Speaker 3: we can do business right. The constitution and the function
Speaker 3: of government is not to make profits for corporations. That's
Speaker 3: what it's become. But that was not the intention. The
Speaker 3: intention was to protect the god given rights of people,
Speaker 3: and to do that you separated power. But they always
Speaker 3: come in and they did the same thing with the
Speaker 3: AI data centers. And Trump is leading the charge this
Speaker 3: time instead of Obama. So now it's a righteous cause
Speaker 3: because we have the Messiah Trump doing it right, the
Speaker 3: fake Messiah. And so no criticism at all from the
Speaker 3: Conservatives except for Massey in terms of doing that. Guard Goldsmith,
Speaker 3: good to see your guard. Thank you for doing such
Speaker 3: a great job on Friday. I appreciate that liberty conspiracy. So,
Speaker 3: by the way, Massy's opponent gets to keep a sizeable
Speaker 3: amount of the donations that are not spent if he loses. Yeah,
Speaker 3: never forget that. That's a big part of the slush
Speaker 3: fund for politicians. It's not just the insider trading, it's
Speaker 3: being able to keep the money if you lose, right,
Speaker 3: conservative Thanker says, if voting is fake, why would they
Speaker 3: spend so much money to get rid of Massy. Well,
Speaker 3: it's about manufacturing consent, right. The big role of elections,
Speaker 3: I think is to manufacture consent for what they're going
Speaker 3: to do. And they can always point to and say,
Speaker 3: we've got a mandate. See, we put this out, this
Speaker 3: is what we wanted to do, and this is our guy,
Speaker 3: this is our boy, this is our puppet, and you
Speaker 3: all voted for that. So now we have a mandate
Speaker 3: to rule. They don't appeal to the Constitution for a mandate.
Speaker 3: They appeal to these elections. That's why it is important
Speaker 3: to them to keep that facade up. But they have
Speaker 3: so many ways to control this, it truly is amazing.
Speaker 7: Comment up partly to respond to everyone. There are a
Speaker 7: few people in the chat that are pretty down on
Speaker 7: Massy in general. And sure you may have some things
Speaker 7: that he did that he didn't agree with, but he's
Speaker 7: still the best we've got. Yeah, If not Massy, then
Speaker 7: who It's, as you've said, a referendum of not allowing
Speaker 7: the Israeli lobby to decide who gets to be a senator.
Speaker 2: That's right, that is the issue. Folks or a congressman.
Speaker 2: That is the absolute issue.
Speaker 3: Are we going to be controlled by a foreign government
Speaker 3: that robs us, picks our pocket, and sends us into
Speaker 3: war for them. That's exactly what ed gall Ryan is about,
Speaker 3: because that's what his owners are about, his donor owners.
Speaker 3: We're going to take a quick break, and when we
Speaker 3: come back, we're going to talk about Trump, who is
Speaker 3: now today was supposed to be the kickoff of the
Speaker 3: attack on Iron that he's been promising, but of course
Speaker 3: he did another taco nacho.
Speaker 2: He says, he canceled this at the last minute.
Speaker 3: He just had to do it because there are some
Speaker 3: Arab leaders who didn't want him to do this, so
Speaker 3: he's got to pull this back. What a BS artist.
Speaker 3: This guy is truly is amazing. But we're going to
Speaker 3: take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 8: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 8: mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen
Speaker 8: wherever you go.
Speaker 3: By the way, we're talking about APAK and how they
Speaker 3: are funding Congress and so forth. The people who fund
Speaker 3: this show, By the way, let me read out their names.
Speaker 3: That these are checks that we got in in the
Speaker 3: last week. These checks from May. Let me just read
Speaker 3: out first name and last initial. Thank you so much
Speaker 3: to all of you. Jony S, Gary B, Judy E.
Speaker 3: Dale L HD from NC, Lois L, Marty K, Scott C,
Speaker 3: Mason H, Joel B, James F, Ronald C, jack Y, Margaret,
Speaker 3: Mary T, Timothy W. Aaron F. And Karen C. Thank
Speaker 3: you so much, and thank you for the birthday card
Speaker 3: as well. From Lois. I appreciate that many people sent
Speaker 3: me birthday cards. My birthday was the end of April,
Speaker 3: and many birthday wishes, and thank you all of you.
Speaker 3: Have not thanked to each and every person, but I
Speaker 3: really do appreciate it and appreciate the encouragement. And we
Speaker 3: are I think about fifty percent right now in the
Speaker 3: gas gage, so we're closing in on the goal, and
Speaker 3: we want to thank all of you. By the way,
Speaker 3: Trump has announced that he's canceled this attack on Iran.
Speaker 3: I just plead for you yesterday the uh kind of
Speaker 3: the spaghetti western parody that Iran of Donald Trump. He's
Speaker 3: gunning for this guy who's sitting in a bathtub filled
Speaker 3: with SuDS, right, and he comes in boasting about how
Speaker 3: he's going to wipe out their civilization, do this and
Speaker 3: do that and everything to him, and the guy has
Speaker 3: got a gun underneath the underneath the soap bubbles, and
Speaker 3: he just shoots him. He's, you know, either do it
Speaker 3: or shut up. You know, I'm tired of hearing about it.
Speaker 3: It's like, yeah, the good, bad and the Orange is
Speaker 3: what they should have called that. But again, Trump is
Speaker 3: the king of bs.
Speaker 2: Just like you know John Lovett.
Speaker 3: Remember he said he said, well, yeah, Israel, Rubio said
Speaker 3: we had to do it, and he admits it. You know,
Speaker 3: first said it and then Donald Trump admitted it. He said, yeah,
Speaker 3: they were going to attack, and I was going to
Speaker 3: put us in jeopardy. So we decided we would join
Speaker 3: them to try to defend ourselves after they attack. But
Speaker 3: you can say that I'm the one who did it. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's the ticket, you know. Just like John Lovett, the liar,
Speaker 3: you know, you can see him just making this stuff
Speaker 3: up as he's monologuing about this kind of stuff. And
Speaker 3: again he did it again when he said, yeah, we
Speaker 3: don't really need to get the nuclear stuff.
Speaker 2: I had just obliterated it.
Speaker 3: He'd said that once before last summer, but it was
Speaker 3: now an imminent threat. Wasn't an imminent threat. No, what
Speaker 3: he said was, he said, we don't really need to
Speaker 3: get that dust. He told Sean Hennedy just this last week.
Speaker 3: He said, we got eyes on it. Nobody's going anywhere
Speaker 3: near it. That would Here's a translation for the Maga people,
Speaker 3: the multitude of asinine, gullible Americans. When he says we
Speaker 3: obliterate it, and when he says nobody's gone near that,
Speaker 3: that means that there is no eminent threat, which means
Speaker 3: that what he did is completely unconstitutional and illegal. Constitution
Speaker 3: requires Congress declare war, and the War Powers Act is
Speaker 3: a law that says that you go to Congress unless
Speaker 3: it is an eminent threat. It was not an eminent threat. Well,
Speaker 3: we have one guy who I've not seen this name
Speaker 3: before and I'm not sure I can even pronounce it,
Speaker 3: Chamath Palapia, Palaaptia. I guess I think he's from India,
Speaker 3: and he has written an op ed piece and he says,
Speaker 3: I think Taiwan loses its strategic importance in eighteen months.
Speaker 3: What is their strategic importance? Well, the fact that they
Speaker 3: are manufacturing semiconductor components. If you look at Nvidia and
Speaker 3: other people like that, they don't do their own manufacturing, right,
Speaker 3: That's what they call fabulous. They don't have any fabrication.
Speaker 3: And I would surprised to see that even Texas Instruments,
Speaker 3: who I used to work for, doesn't do that. I
Speaker 3: mean when I went to work for them, that was
Speaker 3: what they were offering themselves for. They they offered themselves
Speaker 3: out to people like Apple Computer or Samsung or somebody
Speaker 3: who's putting proprietary chips in their cell phones, and they say, well,
Speaker 3: you know, you designed the chip, and we will manufacture
Speaker 3: it for you in our fabrication facilities.
Speaker 2: Well, they started.
Speaker 3: Getting out of that, even as right after I left,
Speaker 3: they started getting out of that. They were having a
Speaker 3: great deal of difficulty at Texas Instruments manufacturing the state
Speaker 3: of the art memory chips. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: they were getting essentially zero yield their facility in Houston.
Speaker 3: They did have a Japanese facility where they were getting
Speaker 3: some pretty good yield, and that was where they were
Speaker 3: getting all of their manufacturing stuff. Again, the people were
Speaker 3: they were hiring in Houston where I worked, my friends
Speaker 3: and I we were in a slightly different group. We
Speaker 3: were doing semi custom semiconductors, and so a lot of
Speaker 3: the fabrication had already been done and just the final
Speaker 3: stages of it where you would connect up the different
Speaker 3: transistors is what was being customized for people. And yet
Speaker 3: over at the facility where they're making the state of
Speaker 3: the art memory chips, we would go over there to
Speaker 3: the cafeteria whatever. We would see these guys walking around.
Speaker 3: They would have these clean room outfits where they would
Speaker 3: have suits, so they put on they put on booties,
Speaker 3: on their shoes. They would cover their hair with like
Speaker 3: a shower cap type of thing. But they had to
Speaker 3: be cool, right, So they got to the break area
Speaker 3: taking a break, and you would see them walking around
Speaker 3: with these.
Speaker 2: Covers that were on their shoes, still on their shoes.
Speaker 3: It's like, so you realize that defeats the purpose, right,
Speaker 3: And then to look cool, they would take the shower
Speaker 3: cap and cock it back on their head and it's like,
Speaker 3: I wonder why we're getting zero. It was the dumbest
Speaker 3: thing I'd ever seen. But the guy who started Taiwan
Speaker 3: Manufacturing Taiwan Semicitactor Manufacturing Corporation TSMC, that guy worked for
Speaker 3: Texas Instruments for decades, in twenty or thirty years or something,
Speaker 3: and he's getting close to retirement. He was pretty well known.
Speaker 3: As a matter of fact. He didn't work just for
Speaker 3: Texas Instruments. He also worked for General Instruments and many others,
Speaker 3: and so he had pretty good reputation the Taiwanese government.
Speaker 3: He wanted to retire and go home to Taiwan. Taiwanese
Speaker 3: government offered to give him some money and to start
Speaker 3: fabrication there and was very successful. And it is huge
Speaker 3: compared to the economy that is there. So again, when
Speaker 3: you look at his accomplishment that was there, it truly
Speaker 3: is amazing. He had let me see if I can
Speaker 3: find this here.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Trump attacked Taiwan, dumping on Taiwan as a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: and he was saying things like should the people of
Speaker 3: Taiwan feel more or less secure? After a meeting with President,
Speaker 3: she asked Brett Bear and he goes off on a
Speaker 3: riff saying they stole our chip industry. No, they didn't
Speaker 3: steal the chip industry. They just did something that we
Speaker 3: weren't capable of doing. And then he goes on to say, well,
Speaker 3: you know, it's fifty nine miles away, fifty nine miles
Speaker 3: we are ninety five hundred miles away. So, in other words,
Speaker 3: of fifty nine miles away from China, but we're ninety
Speaker 3: five hundred miles away. I guess you could say the
Speaker 3: same thing about Israel, couldn't you, except he doesn't.
Speaker 7: Yes, we have the video of Trump sacking about Taiwan
Speaker 7: allegedly stealing the.
Speaker 2: Yeah, go ahead and play that.
Speaker 16: Yeah, twelve billion dollars is a lot of weapons. But
Speaker 16: you know, when you look at the odds, China's a
Speaker 16: very very powerful, big country. That's a very small island.
Speaker 16: It's you think of it, it's fifty nine miles away,
Speaker 16: fifty nine miles we're nine thou five hundred miles away.
Speaker 16: That's a little bit of a difficult problem. With all
Speaker 16: of that being said, you know, if you look at
Speaker 16: the history of Taiwan, Taiwan was developed because we had
Speaker 16: presidents that didn't know what the hell they were doing.
Speaker 16: Because if they were to put tariffs on chips coming in,
Speaker 16: it would they would have never left. Everything was about
Speaker 16: Intel and everything was about our chip companies. They stole
Speaker 16: our chip industry. So I've said that for years. I said,
Speaker 16: you know, for years they stole our chip. If we
Speaker 16: would have had one of our presidents just say we're
Speaker 16: going to say we're going to put one hundred percent chip.
Speaker 16: You can leave, you can build in Taiwan, but we're
Speaker 16: going to you sell it back into the United States.
Speaker 16: We're going to put one hundred percent or two hundred
Speaker 16: percent tariff, we.
Speaker 1: Would have a lost the chip we city.
Speaker 2: He doesn't know anything coming back, and I do.
Speaker 10: Taiwan.
Speaker 3: Let me just jump in here and say, you know,
Speaker 3: the guy that I was talking about, look at his
Speaker 3: name is Morris Chang, and he left the American companies
Speaker 3: in nineteen eighty six. From eighty seven to two thousand
Speaker 3: and five, he was CEO of this company now that
Speaker 3: has the largest corporation in Taiwan. I thought I wrote
Speaker 3: it down here, but I didn't. It's a pretty large
Speaker 3: chunk of their gross domestic product comes from this one company, TSMC.
Speaker 3: He had worked for Sylvania, He'd worked for Texas Instruments,
Speaker 3: he worked for General Instruments. And you know, when you
Speaker 3: talk about stealing the chip industry away from us, Like
Speaker 3: I said, what I saw at Texas Instruments was that
Speaker 3: they were getting really low yields. They were not operating
Speaker 3: very well. So while he was still there, they started
Speaker 3: moving towards making digital signal processing chips and other things
Speaker 3: like that. They are now totally fabulous. They don't do
Speaker 3: any man manufactory. They farm it out to other companies
Speaker 3: like TSMC. That's why it's become such a strategic issue
Speaker 3: and why if there is a war, it is going
Speaker 3: to become a global problem, just like the Strait of
Speaker 3: hor Moves. If you shut down TSMC and the Taiwan
Speaker 3: chip industry, you got big problems. People are going to
Speaker 3: have big problems for everything. Nvidia uses their fabrication facilities
Speaker 3: that are there. But again, it was the choice of
Speaker 3: American companies to get out of the fabrication industry because
Speaker 3: they weren't able to compete effectively. They didn't steal anything
Speaker 3: from anybody. But if you want to take the same
Speaker 3: same approach, when you look at the Strait of Taiwan
Speaker 3: only fifty nine miles wide, it's not that much different
Speaker 3: than the Strait of her Moves. You think Trump learned something.
Speaker 3: Is he finally taking people's advice on things? I don't know,
Speaker 3: But again, you know, so we're ninety five hundred Miley,
Speaker 3: it's not our business. I wish he would say that
Speaker 3: about Israel. But of course there isn't a Taiwanese equivalent
Speaker 3: of apak in this country, is there. They're not buying
Speaker 3: Congressman left and right like Israel. That's the big difference
Speaker 3: right there. Now, this guy was saying he doesn't think that.
Speaker 3: The Chumath guy says he doesn't think that Taiwan is
Speaker 3: going to be strategically important in eighteen months. He said,
Speaker 3: right now, they are important for three reasons. Number One,
Speaker 3: it is indispensable to the global semicroductor of production. That's
Speaker 3: what he thinks is going to change. Number Two, it
Speaker 3: sits at the center of the Western Pacific security architecture,
Speaker 3: and it remains a major flashpoint in US China relations.
Speaker 3: So if we just give up on all of it,
Speaker 3: we can remove number three. Number two remains, and then
Speaker 3: number one is actually questionable.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: The interesting thing I think about all this stuff is
Speaker 3: that Trump likes the American military industrial complex, the American empire.
Speaker 3: It makes him powerful, it makes him, it feeds his
Speaker 3: ability to bully people. But the reality is is that
Speaker 3: by using it this way, he's destroying that power the
Speaker 3: same way that Biden by weaponizing the Fiat dollar a
Speaker 3: major source of power. By weaponizing that, Biden undercut it.
Speaker 3: What he did when he started applying sanctions and using
Speaker 3: Swift and other parts of that to control of people economically,
Speaker 3: what he did was he started pushing people away from
Speaker 3: that system. The same thing is happening in terms of geopolitics,
Speaker 3: which again is really ego politics. When Trump does it,
Speaker 3: it's not about what is happening geopolitically. So he goes
Speaker 3: on to say, well, we're eighteen months from Taiwan not
Speaker 3: being important in terms of fabrication, and he thinks there's
Speaker 3: going to be some miraculous change and all this stuff.
Speaker 3: I don't see that happening quite frankly. I think American
Speaker 3: industry has gotten lazy. They have been spoiled by massive
Speaker 3: amounts of money from the US government. The money was easy,
Speaker 3: and they eased off instead of being competitive. So the
Speaker 3: rise of US chip fabs, many of which were based
Speaker 3: in Arizona, could soon turn the state into the new Taiwan.
Speaker 3: Well here's the reality of this, and I've talked about
Speaker 3: this about a year ago. The Biden administration put together
Speaker 3: the chips Act, and it is a classic case of
Speaker 3: trying to subsidize industries that aren't working, trying to pick
Speaker 3: winners and losers. But of course Trump is a Democrat
Speaker 3: as well. He does the same type of thing. And
Speaker 3: so when you look at what this guy is saying, says, well,
Speaker 3: you know, they poured billions of dollars have been given
Speaker 3: to Intel, and in Arizona, they gave billions of dollars
Speaker 3: to this TSMC, the Taiwan Semicactor Manufacturing Corporation. They opened
Speaker 3: up a large facility. They had American engineers who went
Speaker 3: to Taiwan and trained and they and came back here.
Speaker 3: As a matter of fact, but it's a big issue
Speaker 3: with the American engineers. They said, you know, when we're
Speaker 3: working here, we're not liked by the Taiwanese. They want
Speaker 3: you to absolutely have your entire life wrapped up in
Speaker 3: the company. And so we'll have the Taiwanese engineers will
Speaker 3: be here and even if there's nothing to do, they
Speaker 3: will stay in order to virtue signal their loyalty to
Speaker 3: the company. I'm not going to do it, said the
Speaker 3: American engineers. Now, I don't blame them, I mean that's
Speaker 3: part of their corporate culture and is that kind of
Speaker 3: obsession that makes them competitive. But I wouldn't want that.
Speaker 3: I don't think any of us would want that. And
Speaker 3: so the American engineers are not kind of having a
Speaker 3: culture class with these people, because they're not going to
Speaker 3: stay around the clock and sleep there at the facility
Speaker 3: just to virtual signal their loyalty to the corporation. And
Speaker 3: so there's a lot of issues. They don't the Taiwanese
Speaker 3: don't trust the Americans. They're not giving them the kind
Speaker 3: of training. All the hallmarks are that this massive quote
Speaker 3: unquote investment, this massive subsidy, is the reality of this
Speaker 3: by the Biden administration of the Trump administration is going
Speaker 3: to fail. They are not going to turn into Taiwan
Speaker 3: in the desert, not at all. Nobody thinks that's going
Speaker 3: to happen, except for some of these Pollyannas who trust government.
Speaker 3: So he said, this is Trump's perspective. I said, one
Speaker 3: guy who is a geopolitical risk analysis lest this should
Speaker 3: say the only thing that matters about Taiwan is the Chips.
Speaker 3: But that is a very different perspective. While the US
Speaker 3: allies in the region, Japan, South Korea, Australia. They see
Speaker 3: a rising militarized China. Trump only sees the chip competition
Speaker 3: and he has a clue as to what that is about.
Speaker 3: He thinks they stole it from us. No, it isn't
Speaker 3: ours to own. You have to compete in a free market.
Speaker 3: That's what he doesn't get this. I guess he's had
Speaker 3: so many businesses that have failed. But again it's just
Speaker 3: another paper fiat currency tiger that we're looking at. Perhaps
Speaker 3: what we're eighteen months away from is the American Empire
Speaker 3: crashing and burning. And there was an interesting metaphor of that.
Speaker 3: I think that happened yesterday. You had at an air show.
Speaker 3: You had a couple of American jets who collided locked
Speaker 3: together and then crashed to the ground. You can see
Speaker 3: the parachutes of the four pilot, of the four personnel,
Speaker 3: and there's two people on each of these fighter jets.
Speaker 3: Here's a clip of that. This they locked together and
Speaker 3: there's the parachutes going out.
Speaker 2: Figure that.
Speaker 3: So everybody survived, but it crashes and burns. It's the fire.
Speaker 3: I think that's a great metaphor for where the American
Speaker 3: Empire is headed. Quite frankly, the Iranians are saying that
Speaker 3: if Trump wants to use a navy to try to
Speaker 3: open up these straits, that the Gulf of Oman could
Speaker 3: become a graveyard for the US fleet. Well, you know,
Speaker 3: maybe the r moo's disastrous arrogance, Trump is finally listening
Speaker 3: to some people. Maybe that's why he backed off. I
Speaker 3: wouldn't count on it, though, or Moose and all the
Speaker 3: rest of the stuff. Trump is becoming a royal pain
Speaker 3: in the gas, isn't he Just look at the price.
Speaker 3: Trump is still secretly trying to exert more control over Greenland.
Speaker 3: He's still planning on a war with Cuba. I mean,
Speaker 3: what is going on with this guy?
Speaker 2: War?
Speaker 1: War war?
Speaker 3: He's Lindsay Graham's favorite president. Now they should tell you everything.
Speaker 3: So speaking of farcical, because again we had the that's
Speaker 3: what the American analyst, intelligence analyst, the Trump's CIA Guy
Speaker 3: Ratcliffe said. You know what Net, Yahoo and the Israelis
Speaker 3: are telling you, it's absolutely farcical. Well, Trump is still
Speaker 3: secretly trying to exert more control over Greenland. Yeah, the
Speaker 3: Trump presidency I think gets an F and the F
Speaker 3: is not simply for failing.
Speaker 2: The F is for farcical that's where we are. But
Speaker 2: they're still.
Speaker 3: Alarming the people in Greenland and people in Denmark about
Speaker 3: their designs on Greenland. And as all of this is
Speaker 3: happening over the weekend, again we had the prayer weekend supposedly,
Speaker 3: and you don't need to have government call you to pray, right,
Speaker 3: That's the key issue with this when we look at
Speaker 3: Trump's Religious Liberty Commission and how they kicked off somebody
Speaker 3: who criticized Israel said, well, you're anti Semitic, and you
Speaker 3: don't have the liberty to say that you're going to
Speaker 3: control somebody's speech, you also control their religion. Those two
Speaker 3: things are connected, especially when it is political speech. You're
Speaker 3: not allowed to criticize Israeli government because it is a religion.
Speaker 3: To these conservatives and the people who are running this project, well,
Speaker 3: so they have a weekend of prayer, and again the
Speaker 3: Bible calls us to pray, so I don't care what
Speaker 3: the American government says about praying for your leaders. And
Speaker 3: at the center of it all was Trump declaring a
Speaker 3: national Sabbath. And at the middle of the weekend, what
Speaker 3: they did was they elevated Israel and the Rabbinical Judaistic
Speaker 3: religion that has now taken the place of what people
Speaker 3: think if they read the Bible of the Old Testament,
Speaker 3: that is nothing at all like Judaism today, nothing at
Speaker 3: all like it. And so over the weekend they were
Speaker 3: pushing their version of rabbinical Judaism on people. And what
Speaker 3: you see with that at the center of it, they said, well,
Speaker 3: this is a National Jewish Heritage Month. We don't have
Speaker 3: a National Christian Heritage Month. Isn't that interesting? We have
Speaker 3: a National Jewish Heritage Month because you know, we all
Speaker 3: know that all the founding fathers were Jewish. Well no,
Speaker 3: most of them were Freemason's, but they were not Jewish.
Speaker 3: And so then you have Eric Metexas, who on Sunday,
Speaker 3: holding his worship service of the Trump had this to say,
Speaker 3: let me find this clip here, this is here, we
Speaker 3: are right here.
Speaker 15: It's hard to believe that it would take two centuries.
Speaker 6: For the Lord to raise up a great man to
Speaker 6: bring that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, had finally to.
Speaker 15: Stand where it needs to stand.
Speaker 2: It's extraordinary.
Speaker 6: We only had to wait two hundred years.
Speaker 2: For the ballroom, he says, for the ballroom.
Speaker 3: And I guess you spell ballroom b al because that's
Speaker 3: what ball or bail as I used to always pronounce it.
Speaker 3: That's what it means, the lord, right, it's a fake
Speaker 3: lord and anti god lord, and that's what it's their ballroom.
Speaker 3: B aa l to Baphamet or Malik or whatever.
Speaker 7: I just find it hilarious that he's like, it's finally happened.
Speaker 7: It only took two hundred years from to make the ballroom.
Speaker 7: The dream of America has been realized. The founders wanted
Speaker 7: this ballroom, but they just couldn't achieve it. They could,
Speaker 7: you know, defeat the British, but building a ballroom is
Speaker 7: beyond them.
Speaker 3: If only Marie Antoinette right, let him have a ball
Speaker 3: instead of letting him have a cake.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that was their dream, wasn't it. So then after
Speaker 3: he came under withering criticism, And here's an example of
Speaker 3: some of this. As one person said, you know, we
Speaker 3: already have a ballroom. So the US government already has
Speaker 3: a ballroom just down the street. The Andrew Mellon Auditorium
Speaker 3: is less than a mile away from the White House.
Speaker 3: It is beautiful, it accommodates more people than the new
Speaker 3: ballroom will, and it is owned by the US government.
Speaker 3: How about that we've already got one, and it's probably
Speaker 3: more beautiful than what Trump is going to build because
Speaker 3: we're seeing the aententification of everything, including architecture everywhere.
Speaker 7: I don't know, I'm not seeing any gold covered everything there.
Speaker 7: It could use a few more statues of Trump.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: That'll make it more beautiful in it anyway. So, after
Speaker 3: getting all kinds of criticism, he says, well, that was
Speaker 3: just sarcastic humor. Did that sound like humor to you?
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 3: Maybe that's what passes for humor with the Maga crowd now,
Speaker 3: I don't know. We always hear that, don't we. They
Speaker 3: erect gold statues of him, and they say, no, no, no,
Speaker 3: we're not really worshiping Trump. That was just a joke
Speaker 3: that we put up there. I've heard that over and
Speaker 3: over again. No, it isn't. It is idolatry. We all
Speaker 3: see it. They are the ones who are the jokes.
Speaker 3: And if it is a joke, I guess it's the
Speaker 3: kind of joke that bablin B has become. Bablin B
Speaker 3: now is the joke. They're no longer funny, no longer satirical.
Speaker 3: And Eric Metaxas is not funny or satirical in any
Speaker 3: of this either. He was called out on his idolatry.
Speaker 3: You know, the Lord picked this guy to build a ballroom.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: So it's hard to believe that it takes two centuries
Speaker 3: for the Lord to raise up a great man to
Speaker 3: bring that ballroom finally to stand where it needs to stand.
Speaker 3: We've heard that over and over again from these people.
Speaker 3: God raised up Trump. You know, the question is I
Speaker 3: believe that as well. I don't think there's anything that
Speaker 3: happens in this world that isn't under God's control. If
Speaker 3: there is, then he's not God. However, the question is
Speaker 3: what is the purpose of Trump? Is it to punish
Speaker 3: us or to bless us?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 7: For a ballroom such as this?
Speaker 3: I raised you, that's right, Yeah, fair phrase, mortar guy
Speaker 3: talking to you esther. Yeah, truly, the arc of redemptive
Speaker 3: history bends toward banquet, said one person, a commenter that
Speaker 3: was Kaylee Triller. Another one says God created America so
Speaker 3: that we could make a ballroom for our want to
Speaker 3: be king, says Eric Metaxas. Another person, this is Matt Royer.
Speaker 3: He says, yeah, we only had to wait two hundred
Speaker 3: years for the dream of the Founding Fathers to be realized,
Speaker 3: a royal ballroom that King George the Third would be
Speaker 3: proud of. Yeah, well again we've got King Trump the heard,
Speaker 3: who is God promised us the ballroom two hundred years ago,
Speaker 3: said reason Anthology. And now that is satire. All four
Speaker 3: Gospels warn us about this kind of excrement. They warned
Speaker 3: us two thousand years ago, and here we are today,
Speaker 3: said Josh Cowen. Another person, Aaron Melnick, said Founders believed
Speaker 3: in a separation of church and state because they knew
Speaker 3: that it would corrupt religion to intertwine it with the public.
Speaker 2: And here we are.
Speaker 3: How many times have I said that? I said, the
Speaker 3: importance is that you put a wall. What Jefferson said
Speaker 3: was he said, there's a wall around the state, essentially
Speaker 3: to protect it from you, and because if it unifies
Speaker 3: with you, it always corrupts.
Speaker 2: I said.
Speaker 3: When you add the state to the church, what you
Speaker 3: wind up with is the date it takes over everything
Speaker 3: that is its natural bent. Christian nationalism is a political, spiritual,
Speaker 3: and moral cancer, said another And I absolutely agree with that. Absolutely.
Speaker 3: Both of those are essentially the same thing. Bingo, These
Speaker 3: guy who's get the comment of the award here.
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 17: So.
Speaker 3: They absolutely refer to it as the ballroom b aa
Speaker 3: l behind closed doors, don't they? Another one said, well,
Speaker 3: I'm just flipping through the Bible trying to find that
Speaker 3: verse about a ballroom so I can show it to
Speaker 3: Eric Metaxas. Speaking of people who don't understand where they
Speaker 3: fit in all of this, we have Elon musk Is
Speaker 3: comparing Neuralink and the work that he's doing there to
Speaker 3: that of Jesus. And how many times have I said
Speaker 3: that as well? I said, these guys, you know, he's
Speaker 3: out there saying we're gonna get the blind to see,
Speaker 3: the lame to walk, the dumb to speak, and and
Speaker 3: now he is actually making that connection to Jesus. I said,
Speaker 3: they're going to put this out as a kind of
Speaker 3: fake miracle, he said, describeing to our links work, he
Speaker 3: says it has enabled people who have completely lost their
Speaker 3: brain body connection to be able to speak again, and
Speaker 3: I think it will enable people to walk. He goes
Speaker 3: on to say, restoring control of people who are tetraplegics
Speaker 3: and restoring sight, I think is a pretty big deal.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 3: I've always seen that as quadriplegic, quad and tetra both
Speaker 3: mean for I don't know anyway. He says, they're sort
Speaker 3: of what I would call Jesus level technologies. Now, Jesus
Speaker 3: created the DNA. Jesus breathed life into things that you're
Speaker 3: not doing that, you're just manipulating what He's already created.
Speaker 3: And just like these other transhumanists who believe the foundational
Speaker 3: lie of the Garden of Eden told by their master Satan, Yeah,
Speaker 3: you will become like God and you will lift forever.
Speaker 3: No you won't, No, you won't. Only Christ has the
Speaker 3: gift of eternal life, and it is a gift. It's
Speaker 3: not anything that you can learn. It is something that
Speaker 3: he offers for free. But Musk also said that Tesla
Speaker 3: will have autonomous vehicles. He said, the car is starting
Speaker 3: to feel like it is sentient. As we improve the software,
Speaker 3: you can feel the sentience growing in the car. It
Speaker 3: feels alive. Does it well to what purpose? Well, cars
Speaker 3: are fast becoming.
Speaker 7: It feels a live as long as you buy the
Speaker 7: you know, two hundred dollars a month sentient package that
Speaker 7: I've just released.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right. Well, it is starting to come alive.
Speaker 3: But again you know to what purpose well as one
Speaker 3: headline puts it. And this is Steve Watson got this
Speaker 3: one right. He said cars are fast becoming dystopian in pods.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: The surveillance state has found the newest frontier. Your car's dashboard.
Speaker 3: What used to be a symbol of American freedom and
Speaker 3: independence is rapidly morphing into a high tech cage that
Speaker 3: watches your every move and can override your decisions that will.
Speaker 3: Here's the example of a guy who's got a new
Speaker 3: Subaru and it's got what they call AI eyesight.
Speaker 17: All right, I gotta come on here and vent real quick.
Speaker 17: My wife got a new car through her work. It's
Speaker 17: a brand new, it's got no miles on it, brand new,
Speaker 17: twenty twenty five or twenty twenty six. I imagine Subaru outback,
Speaker 17: and it's got the feature where it says or it's
Speaker 17: the eye sight thing. So it's got a camera on
Speaker 17: the dash if you veer off for two seconds, like
Speaker 17: if you look away like this, or if you're looking outside.
Speaker 17: I got mountains around us, right, so I'm looking at
Speaker 17: the mountains, it'll flash and beep and say keep eyes
Speaker 17: on road. Change my music on spot two seconds and
Speaker 17: it's flash and saying keep eyes on road. I get
Speaker 17: the idea of it, but this is the dumbest thing
Speaker 17: I've ever seen.
Speaker 1: In a car.
Speaker 2: I don't want one either.
Speaker 3: As a matter of fact, I've seen even before SUPERU
Speaker 3: Volkswagen had an ad that they put out and they
Speaker 3: showed a woman who was driving down the interstate and
Speaker 3: she nods off asleep and the car just moves over
Speaker 3: to the shoulder of the road and stops. And so
Speaker 3: you know they're going to use safety as the mcguffin.
Speaker 2: But we all.
Speaker 3: Understand that whether they sell it as safety or whether
Speaker 3: they sell it as emissions, the real purpose of all
Speaker 3: this is a dystopian surveillance society. Safety and emissions and
Speaker 3: climate issues are simply mcguffins that they use for that.
Speaker 3: So again, one person says, well, Super has just turned
Speaker 3: your car into a snitch. This is the government's wet
Speaker 3: dream of eighteen eighty four. Or well inbs another person says,
Speaker 3: so this thing will go off if you look into
Speaker 3: your mirror or over your shoulder to see if it's
Speaker 3: safe to take a turn or change a lane or
Speaker 3: to break What a great idea.
Speaker 7: Yeah, and people are going to start rigidly looking forward
Speaker 7: and never glancing to the side so that it doesn't
Speaker 7: trigger this thing and get a warning sent to their
Speaker 7: insurance company. I'm telling him, Hey, this guy is distracted
Speaker 7: all the time because he's looking in his mirrors. He
Speaker 7: doesn't keep his eyes only straightforward. And that will drive
Speaker 7: people to the self driving cars.
Speaker 3: And we know that'll be the case because again these
Speaker 3: car companies, and they're not going to lose the opportunity
Speaker 3: to monetize that if they can make money by reporting
Speaker 3: you to the insurance company or to the government for
Speaker 3: the way that you're driving, they will turn that data
Speaker 3: over to them.
Speaker 7: Yeah, and they'll have all these excuses of safety. But
Speaker 7: just stop and think for a second that you've got
Speaker 7: a camera connected to an AI staring at you one
Speaker 7: hundred percent of the time.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 7: How is this not freaking people out? Just from a
Speaker 7: privacy standpoint, even if you believed it was actually about safety.
Speaker 3: I think there's going to be an aftermarket for all
Speaker 3: this this thing turned off. I mean I pulled out
Speaker 3: the airbag on my steering wheel, and I got rid
Speaker 3: of the catalytic converter and some other things like that
Speaker 3: on my car. So imagine there's going to be an
Speaker 3: aftermarket for this kind of stuff. What a great idea, says,
Speaker 3: it's all tunnel vision on what is only in front
Speaker 3: of us and ignore everything else what could possibly go wrong.
Speaker 3: And then this is the key and I think this
Speaker 3: is where they miss the point here. One person says, well,
Speaker 3: if they all go bankrupt, they'll stop this garbage. No,
Speaker 3: they won't, because this is what you know. To push
Speaker 3: you on to public transportation, or to make sure that
Speaker 3: you don't get any movement or transportation at all, is
Speaker 3: really what the government is pushing for. In they're fifteen
Speaker 3: minute cities, but my entire life, the government as well
Speaker 3: as urban planners have been saying, we don't want people
Speaker 3: to have cars. We don't want you to have freedom
Speaker 3: and mobility. We want to lock you down. And so
Speaker 3: if you don't buy these cars, that's exactly what they want.
Speaker 3: They want the end of private transportation. Just looking how
Speaker 3: that was our only escape valve back in twenty twenty.
Speaker 7: Yeah, and as for you know, a big aftermarket for
Speaker 7: getting rid of this stuff, they're going to regulate that way.
Speaker 7: They're going to do the same sort of laws that
Speaker 7: they're trying to pass currently for three D printers where
Speaker 7: it cannot be modified by the end user. You will
Speaker 7: not own your car by legislation. It will be legally
Speaker 7: the property of the company that never truly sold it
Speaker 7: to you.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it'll be it'll be prohibited, and it'll be black market,
Speaker 3: but I predict it'll happen anyway. Yeah, But it's like
Speaker 3: drugs are prohibited and they are black market, but they
Speaker 3: happen anyway.
Speaker 7: Yeah. Things are like the three D printer manufacturers. They have,
Speaker 7: you know, regulations about how we have to glue the
Speaker 7: case and make the software hardened against modifications and all that,
Speaker 7: and the companies that are making it have to apply
Speaker 7: by that when they sell it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, absolutely right. You know what, There's a company that
Speaker 3: does aftermarket fit ups on Miadas. They would squeeze in
Speaker 3: a Corvette V eight.
Speaker 2: Engine and.
Speaker 3: Which I think completely changes the characteristic of the car.
Speaker 3: I was not interested in that, but I thought it
Speaker 3: was an interesting project. There's a company called Flying Miata,
Speaker 3: and they have done that with every generation of Miata
Speaker 3: until they got to they said it was kind of
Speaker 3: difficult with the third generation, my generation because they're starting
Speaker 3: to put some electronic controls in it. They so when
Speaker 3: they got the latest one, the fourth generation, they said
Speaker 3: it was nearly impossible because they said, you know, we
Speaker 3: would go in and we would disconnect that, and then
Speaker 3: everything would go haywire on it. The windshel wipers would
Speaker 3: start operating randomly, and all this other kind of stuff,
Speaker 3: and so it is really all interconnected with all that stuff,
Speaker 3: and I mentioned it would be really really difficult to
Speaker 3: do that. Probably sure your best route would just be
Speaker 3: to do a car from scratch.
Speaker 7: And from a software standpoint, they'll try and lock it
Speaker 7: down and then use the Digital Millennium copyright acting to
Speaker 7: come after anyone that tries to put out a software
Speaker 7: thing to get around it, which is exactly what Bamboo Labs,
Speaker 7: the three D printer company, is doing currently. They based
Speaker 7: their software off of an open source thing that said
Speaker 7: anything that you build from this base has to be
Speaker 7: open source, but they're ignoring that and trying to come
Speaker 7: after people that are posting their own versions of it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we see that happening with copyright trolls all the time.
Speaker 3: That's basically what Bamboo is doing as well.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 3: I think Watson and some of these commenters missed this
Speaker 3: when they say, well, the answer is just the boycott
Speaker 3: buying new cars, and so the only real answer is
Speaker 3: to reject and to refuse to buy these surveillance vehicles
Speaker 3: and support the politicians who fight the mandates. Well, the
Speaker 3: problem is the politicians are owned by Israel. Israel likes
Speaker 3: this stuff. Israel is in the district of Orwellian criminals
Speaker 3: likes all this stuff. All these different governments like it.
Speaker 3: You know, when you look at the Netnahu government, they
Speaker 3: came after their own people about all of COVID. They
Speaker 3: turned them into labrats to be surveilled and sold them
Speaker 3: out to the corporations. Our government does the same thing
Speaker 3: as well. And what they want is they want you
Speaker 3: to not have any private vehicles.
Speaker 2: That's the real issue.
Speaker 3: And just by not buying a private vehicle, that's not
Speaker 3: going to be the solution to it.
Speaker 2: I think the real solution. I'll just throw this out.
Speaker 3: I think it's the same type of thing that we
Speaker 3: have seen with guns and whiskey. For example, you have
Speaker 3: the federal government has imposed all kinds of regulations for
Speaker 3: alcohol to back on firearms, but you do have situations
Speaker 3: where locally they can override that stuff. I don't like
Speaker 3: all of the still that have popped up here in
Speaker 3: this area for a vacation stuff anything, but it shows
Speaker 3: that you can overrite, override what the federal government wants.
Speaker 3: And so they've passed that. We've had some other situations
Speaker 3: in other states where they've talked about well, as long
Speaker 3: as it doesn't cross state lines, we can let people
Speaker 3: come into this state and manufacture guns and ignore what
Speaker 3: the ATF is doing. It's going to create a nullification issue,
Speaker 3: but it is something that really can be done. The
Speaker 3: Constitution is on our side, and if you've got the
Speaker 3: people on your side, you could do something like they
Speaker 3: could do the same thing with cars. You go in
Speaker 3: and say we're going to allow people to have real
Speaker 3: cars and they're not going to have all of these
Speaker 3: bells and whistles that make them unaffordable and turn them
Speaker 3: into or well Ian pods. You could do that at
Speaker 3: the state level. It's not going to happen at the
Speaker 3: federal level. Absolutely, it's not going to happen. Well, we're
Speaker 3: going to take a quick break, and before we do,
Speaker 3: I want to just read some of your comments here.
Speaker 3: Fidget guys, says Ai the Great equalizer for idiots. AI,
Speaker 3: we're all idiots now, that's what it stands for.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: Freetard says, never mind all of Elon's brain chipped monkeys
Speaker 3: died horrific deaths. Go ahead and chip me. The Patriot
Speaker 3: girl says, So your car can become a nagging wife.
Speaker 3: Have a friend who they've been married for many decades.
Speaker 3: They have a great family, the great people. The only
Speaker 3: time they ever have an argument is when he's driving
Speaker 3: in the car. And so I said, yeah, you could
Speaker 3: say it was the best of times. It was the
Speaker 3: worst of times. A tale between two cities. But anyway,
Speaker 3: Patty Wax says, the gas may become an issue with
Speaker 3: old vehicles new blend of fifteen percent ethanol. That's right,
Speaker 3: it's what jd Vance is pushing. He went to Idaho
Speaker 3: to push that and to get the money, a big
Speaker 3: ag and people who are there. But again, if you
Speaker 3: can grow alcohol for a particular type of fuel, there
Speaker 3: are some technologies out there that again we could start
Speaker 3: to look at. And I think that is going to
Speaker 3: be a choking point. So you're going to have to
Speaker 3: start learn to do some of these things if we're
Speaker 3: going to have a just in time delivery system and
Speaker 3: all of these bells and whistles and gadgets. That's going
Speaker 3: to be a position of slavery. We're going to have
Speaker 3: to take a couple of steps back and take some
Speaker 3: lessons from the Amish in terms of self reliance.
Speaker 7: Yes, Lance, Yeah, I was just going to say that
Speaker 7: is a good point from Patty Wax that you know,
Speaker 7: they aren't making new old cars. It's you still have
Speaker 7: to care about these legislation things as they are happening,
Speaker 7: because if this gets pushed out by a company, you
Speaker 7: can go around it and go with a company that
Speaker 7: doesn't do that. But as these things get more normalized,
Speaker 7: they're going to say, well, this accident happened, and because
Speaker 7: you didn't have this thing that would you know stop
Speaker 7: your car when you glanced to the side for a second,
Speaker 7: and that will become law for all future cars.
Speaker 2: Mmmm.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, as they started rolling out these self
Speaker 3: driving taxis and I think it was was it Uber
Speaker 3: that did it. It was in Phoenix and you had
Speaker 3: that woman who got run over. She was jaywalking and
Speaker 3: a lot of people said, well, look, you wouldn't be
Speaker 3: able to see that. She came right out of the
Speaker 3: dark and right in front of the car, and it
Speaker 3: had a camera that was facing forward and recorded. It
Speaker 3: also had a camera that was facing back at the
Speaker 3: human driver who was supposed to take over control. It
Speaker 3: was a human driver who would not be able to
Speaker 3: see them coming out of the darkness. And then people said, well,
Speaker 3: wait a minute, you know these things, this particular self
Speaker 3: driving model here does not use a vision system like
Speaker 3: the Tesla does, or like a human does. He uses lightar,
Speaker 3: so it'd be able to see this person a long
Speaker 3: way off and react to that.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, you know what happened is we turned off the
Speaker 3: emergency breaking because it was just going off all the time,
Speaker 3: and so he turned it off. So they just stacked
Speaker 3: these these different technologies and the interdependence of them. They
Speaker 3: stack them up and they have real issues. I mean,
Speaker 3: that's what the real world looks like when you try
Speaker 3: to come out with these g wiz technologies. Now, the
Speaker 3: Walrus says Travis. I remember when they said the same
Speaker 3: exact thing about Trump. What's the context for that?
Speaker 7: Do you know what I was saying about MASSI and
Speaker 7: I did not put that in the best way possible.
Speaker 7: I said, you know, if not him, then who what
Speaker 7: I mean, is he is the only one that is
Speaker 7: actually standing on principles. It was yet they said that
Speaker 7: about Trump because he said good things and then did
Speaker 7: the opposite. Yeah, this is clearly a message of you know,
Speaker 7: if he gets voted out, it's because the Israel lobby
Speaker 7: gets what they want.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Well, it's a difference between what a candidate says and
Speaker 3: what somebody does when they're in office. And that's the
Speaker 3: difference between Massy and Trump. Trump has said a lot
Speaker 3: of things that he betrayed once he got into office.
Speaker 3: Massey has kept his positions there. He does exactly what
Speaker 3: you would expect him to do. He typically always takes
Speaker 3: the side of the constitution, fiscal responsibility and individual liberty,
Speaker 3: and that is reliable. You can take that to the bank.
Speaker 3: You can judge him by his actions and not by
Speaker 3: his party affiliation.
Speaker 7: Is the key thing trying to say is you know,
Speaker 7: if you can't support Massey because of one thing that
Speaker 7: he did at one point, then what politician are you
Speaker 7: ever going to support? You know, I can't There are
Speaker 7: very few politicians that I can't think of a single
Speaker 7: politician that has a record as good as Massy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no, I can't either, and that would include even
Speaker 3: ram Paul, because I've had some issues with what ram
Speaker 3: Paul did with COVID stuff. We look at what is
Speaker 3: happening with gold quickly here before we run out of
Speaker 3: time behind Turkey's gold sales. We look at what is
Speaker 3: happening with and we said this as I was talking
Speaker 3: to Tony. We were talking about the fact that, well,
Speaker 3: gold is there as a backstop for when things get bad,
Speaker 3: and that's exactly what it did do. It did that
Speaker 3: for the Golf States, it did it for Turkey. And
Speaker 3: when you look at what happened with Turkey, the reason
Speaker 3: behind goal is paradoxical. What appears to be a paradoxical
Speaker 3: move the fact that it went down instead of up
Speaker 3: as you had all this Iran war that was started
Speaker 3: by Trump. It was the furious liquidation of gold by
Speaker 3: emerging markets, in this particular case, Turkey scrambling to obtain
Speaker 3: reserve dry powder so that the capital could cover soaring
Speaker 3: costs of energy imports. So you've got the Golf States
Speaker 3: who are looking at losing their income. How do we
Speaker 3: keep this thing going while they cash in some gold.
Speaker 3: You look at Turkey, who is dependent on imports for
Speaker 3: their energy. They see the cost skyrocketing, so they start
Speaker 3: selling off gold. Turkey's foreign reserves had their biggest monthly
Speaker 3: decline on record in March. So Turkey's official reserves cratered
Speaker 3: by about forty three billion dollars in March. Turkey has
Speaker 3: been hit hard by higher oil and gas prices caused
Speaker 3: by the effective closure of the Straight of Hormuz. Then again,
Speaker 3: when you look at this the short term issue that
Speaker 3: we're seeing here with Turkey and some other states cashing
Speaker 3: in massive amounts of gold. Just understand, from our perspective,
Speaker 3: Trump is cranking in the inflation. We've got Trumpflation coming,
Speaker 3: and it is going to be hyper. This guy is
Speaker 3: always hyping stuff. He's going to be hyping the prices
Speaker 3: of everything. They're going to have massive price inflation. Goldman,
Speaker 3: by the way, is reiterating a fifty four hundred dollars
Speaker 3: gold target as India curbs trigger bridle jewelry panic buying.
Speaker 3: So Indian government is now trying to stop the Indian
Speaker 3: people from buying gold because they need to support their
Speaker 3: currency and they're very concerned about that. They have no
Speaker 3: internal source of gold, and so when people buy gold,
Speaker 3: it is money that is flowing out of India following
Speaker 3: the collapse of India's currency over the last couple of weeks,
Speaker 3: doing large part to the world's third largest oil importer
Speaker 3: being hit hard by the inflationary shock caused by Trump's
Speaker 3: energy disruptions in the Persian Gulf, Modi initially urged citizens
Speaker 3: to foregoal gold purchases and to not travel abroad, don't
Speaker 3: do any unnecessary foreign travel because we need to support
Speaker 3: the currency. And again, so you've got Turkey is one
Speaker 3: of the largest and India is the third largest importer
Speaker 3: of oil. All of them are reacting to what is
Speaker 3: happening with us. But the real effect that's going to
Speaker 3: hit us in America is going to be the inflation
Speaker 3: of everything. And that's when gold is really going to
Speaker 3: take off. And that's one of the reasons why Goldman
Speaker 3: Sachs is not backing down off their future projections for gold.
Speaker 3: So again, you can go to Davidnight dot Gold. Now
Speaker 3: is probably a good time because gold is on sale,
Speaker 3: especially if you look at the long term trends, and
Speaker 3: that's the only thing that you can do. You can't
Speaker 3: time the market, and nobody knows what's going to happen
Speaker 3: in the short term, but in the long term, we
Speaker 3: can look at these trends and we know what the
Speaker 3: effect of this embargo is going to be. We have
Speaker 3: seen this movie before and it's really bad. That's why
Speaker 3: I don't want to see the sequel. But Trump must
Speaker 3: have fallen asleep during the OPEC oil embargo, just like
Speaker 3: during that movie. Me didn't seem to learn anything at
Speaker 3: all from it. We look at the election, I said,
Speaker 3: I wanted to get to this and I want to
Speaker 3: do this before we stop the jerry mandering that is happening.
Speaker 3: And this is a competition that's going on between the
Speaker 3: duopoly of the Republicans and Democrats fighting each other over this.
Speaker 3: And as I said before, it is the way that
Speaker 3: they rig the elections even before they get to this stage.
Speaker 3: As we see what they're doing with Thomas Massey, the
Speaker 3: massive obscene amounts of money that are there. You know,
Speaker 3: when you look at the amount of money that's being
Speaker 3: spent on elections, and of course this is now a
Speaker 3: new record for Congress, and it is the amount of
Speaker 3: money that's being dumped in by the government of Israel
Speaker 3: and Israeli supporting billionaires to do this when you look
Speaker 3: at that amount of money, when we look at the
Speaker 3: amount of money that's being spent on the presidential elections,
Speaker 3: I said, and I say it again, it is a
Speaker 3: metric of corruption.
Speaker 2: When George W.
Speaker 3: Bush ran again to al Gore in the two thousand election,
Speaker 3: al Gore accused him of buying the election because he
Speaker 3: raised one hundred million dollars altogether. And that's not just
Speaker 3: what he got directly given to him as a candidate,
Speaker 3: but that's what the RNC got and all these other
Speaker 3: packs that are out there. Al Gore got seventy something
Speaker 3: million dollars. Now, it's not uncommon for us to have
Speaker 3: senatorial races or goobedatorial races where they get more than
Speaker 3: one hundred and seventy million dollars. Now, and we're seeing
Speaker 3: this amount of money just going up exponentially. We've got
Speaker 3: presidential races where the combined amount is over a billion dollars. Now,
Speaker 3: that is a metric of the corruption in Washington. If
Speaker 3: they can print money and hand it out to people,
Speaker 3: or hand it out to a foreign government like Israel,
Speaker 3: of course people are going to invest money into the
Speaker 3: politicians that will give them the money. And so it's
Speaker 3: a measure of corruption. But another measure of corruption is
Speaker 3: the partisan aspect of all this, and that's what we
Speaker 3: see happy with the jerrymandering stuff here in Tennessee. We
Speaker 3: just had the absolutists and the Republican Party led by
Speaker 3: Marsha Blackburn, said no, we can't have a single Democrat seat.
Speaker 3: And they now have the ability with computers to be
Speaker 3: able to pick the voters to such a degree that
Speaker 3: if they don't stop them with jerry mandering, they can
Speaker 3: go in and jerrymander out anybody. And it was a
Speaker 3: court case about this, and the court said, no, they
Speaker 3: can use jerry mandering on this. This, by the way,
Speaker 3: was a district. Hang on, let's go a little bit longer.
Speaker 3: This was a district that was set aside as a
Speaker 3: minority district, so it had a majority black district and Memphis.
Speaker 3: Now Memphis has a large black population to start with.
Speaker 3: But again, if you're going to start creating congressional districts
Speaker 3: along racial lines, that's basically wrong. It's the same type
Speaker 3: of corruption that we see in jury trials. You know,
Speaker 3: it's been said the citizen's power comes out of three boxes,
Speaker 3: the jury box, the ballot box, and the cartridge box. Well,
Speaker 3: when you look at the jury box and the ballot box,
Speaker 3: these things have been rigged unbelievably by jerry mandering and
Speaker 3: by other things. And if they're going to create a
Speaker 3: district that favors a political party, if they're going to
Speaker 3: create a district that favors a particular race, or if
Speaker 3: they're going to create a district that favors a particular religion,
Speaker 3: for example, I could see this happening with Islam coming
Speaker 3: in and setting up a Muslim district or something like that.
Speaker 3: I think all of that is wrong. Just like when
Speaker 3: you allow these people to pick the jury, you have
Speaker 3: essentially picked the outcome, and they just got to go
Speaker 3: with the first twelve people that walk through the door,
Speaker 3: in my opinion, a jury of your peers. So again,
Speaker 3: I think all of this is corruption. The guy that
Speaker 3: is getting kicked out, he is a Democrat who is
Speaker 3: ten and zero in his elections. He's been their congressman
Speaker 3: for twenty years, and now that he's being kicked out.
Speaker 3: He was in tears when he talked to Chris Cuomo
Speaker 3: because this is his life. His life is focused on
Speaker 3: his career as a congressman. But again It just shows
Speaker 3: the power of jerry mandering. And I talked about that
Speaker 3: in North Carolina and North Carolina. Two thousand and eight,
Speaker 3: North Carolina voted for Barack Obama. There was a voter
Speaker 3: remorse after that, big time in North Carolina. And so
Speaker 3: in the twy ten elections, Republicans won everything. Everything they
Speaker 3: got the Republican first time. Republicans had had a majority
Speaker 3: in the state House and the state representatives since reconstruction.
Speaker 3: They won governor, they won everything except for congressional. It's
Speaker 3: not a single seat changed for Congress in spite of
Speaker 3: that massive sea change in the state. What does that
Speaker 3: tell you, Well, the congressional jerrymandering was what had fixed that.
Speaker 3: Twenty ten was a censushire and up until Trump began
Speaker 3: this jerrymandering process. Now they've got a jerrymandering war. You know,
Speaker 3: they pushed it in Texas and then California replied to
Speaker 3: do it for the Democrats. And so now that Trump
Speaker 3: has started this jerrymandering war, they're not waiting for the
Speaker 3: census to happen. But in twenty ten they had a census,
Speaker 3: and that was when they were going to redraw the
Speaker 3: district lines, and it was redrawn by Republicans for the
Speaker 3: first time ever, and they did it in their favor.
Speaker 3: And so the next election twenty twelve, you wound up
Speaker 3: with a majority of Republicans in the congressional district, even
Speaker 3: though the massive sea change that had happened in twenty
Speaker 3: ten didn't change a single congressional seat. And so when
Speaker 3: you look at this, and when you look at this
Speaker 3: map of jerry mandering, it really has become something of
Speaker 3: a monster. And I would even say it looks a
Speaker 3: bit like the Sorcerer's Apprentice. What the Republicans and Democrats
Speaker 3: are doing, they really don't understand what they're messing with.
Speaker 3: That's what the original jerry mandering map look like. Yeah,
Speaker 3: they're creating a monster run away. And this is a
Speaker 3: monster that is destroying our elections, our system of government.
Speaker 3: When they pick the voters, you even forget about it
Speaker 3: being a real election, as I said many times, from
Speaker 3: ballot access to debate access, but it even starts before that.
Speaker 3: It starts with them picking the voters instead of the
Speaker 3: voters picking the politicians. And so when we look at
Speaker 3: whatever happens today with Thomas Massey, the whole election system,
Speaker 3: as I said, is really about manufacturing consent. You know,
Speaker 3: we think that it is about us choosing them. No,
Speaker 3: it's about them choosing the candidates, about them choosing which
Speaker 3: party is going to rule, and then using the elections
Speaker 3: to push their impromoter of authority because they have no
Speaker 3: authority under the constitution. That is what they turned to.
Speaker 3: So again, all this became another bad idea from Trump.
Speaker 3: He decided, well, we're going to make jerrymandering and off
Speaker 3: years in other words, not during census years. We're going
Speaker 3: to do that just strictly for political purposes, going to
Speaker 3: take the map of the mask off. I mean, all
Speaker 3: the reason that they did it every ten years was
Speaker 3: because that's when they would do a census, and they
Speaker 3: would say, well, after we do a census, we're going
Speaker 3: to have to readjust these districts based on the number
Speaker 3: of people that we got and how the congressional seats
Speaker 3: are allocated between the different states. And so that's why
Speaker 3: they would revisit it every ten years. Trump is doing
Speaker 3: it for purely political reasoning. And again it's like everything else.
Speaker 3: It's like the weaponization stuff that he's involved in. When
Speaker 3: the Democrats do it, the Republicans complain about it when
Speaker 3: the Republicans do it. When Trump does it, the Republicans
Speaker 3: cheer because they don't understand how it's going to be
Speaker 3: used against them. Go ahead and play us out lance
Speaker 3: Trump's unique strategy and immediate backlash. California fired back. And
Speaker 3: so now what we have is a redistricting civil war
Speaker 3: that is happening. How is this going to shake out?
Speaker 17: Well?
Speaker 3: The Republicans have a slight advantage in terms of legislatures
Speaker 3: state legislatures that they control, so it might in the
Speaker 3: short term work for them, but it is a corruption
Speaker 3: of the system, just like the jury selection is a
Speaker 3: corruption of the jury system.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 3: The common man. They created common Core and dumbed down
Speaker 3: our children. They created common past, track and control us.
Speaker 3: Their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 3: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 3: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 3: created in the image of God. That is what we
Speaker 3: have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 3: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 3: to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 2: want to hide. Please share the information.
Speaker 3: And links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank
Speaker 3: you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't
Speaker 3: support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The
Speaker 3: Davidnightshow dot com