WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome to another open chat. Hopefully it will work.

2
00:00:04.240 --> 00:00:06.919
<v Speaker 2>As I'm on the road, it's always a toss up,

3
00:00:06.960 --> 00:00:09.039
<v Speaker 2>you never know, but we'll go to shot.

4
00:00:09.119 --> 00:00:09.839
<v Speaker 3>Hey, how's it going.

5
00:00:10.400 --> 00:00:12.839
<v Speaker 4>Or I was supposed to speak earlier on my personal

6
00:00:12.880 --> 00:00:14.759
<v Speaker 4>account and then I don't know what happened. It's like

7
00:00:14.800 --> 00:00:18.920
<v Speaker 4>I got banned or something, but that it was really

8
00:00:18.960 --> 00:00:20.679
<v Speaker 4>weird and I wasn't able to actually.

9
00:00:20.719 --> 00:00:22.559
<v Speaker 1>You multiple times.

10
00:00:22.719 --> 00:00:25.359
<v Speaker 3>My bad about that. My headphones must have been glitchen.

11
00:00:25.440 --> 00:00:28.199
<v Speaker 4>But so I want to first of all say that

12
00:00:28.359 --> 00:00:31.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm a huge fan of the stuff you've done exposing

13
00:00:31.519 --> 00:00:35.159
<v Speaker 4>like Hollywood occultism, and you've been an influence on me

14
00:00:35.240 --> 00:00:37.679
<v Speaker 4>as far as like orthodoxy goes. My girlfriend and i've

15
00:00:37.719 --> 00:00:41.920
<v Speaker 4>been attending Orthodox churches when we can for the last

16
00:00:42.159 --> 00:00:44.920
<v Speaker 4>several months. So definitely a big fan of you in

17
00:00:44.960 --> 00:00:48.320
<v Speaker 4>that regard. But I've never been I don't fully I've

18
00:00:48.359 --> 00:00:52.359
<v Speaker 4>been like an advocate for libertarianism for quite a long

19
00:00:52.399 --> 00:00:57.719
<v Speaker 4>time now. I you know, I've seen the last twenty

20
00:00:57.840 --> 00:01:00.679
<v Speaker 4>or so years of like socialism and war in central

21
00:01:00.719 --> 00:01:04.879
<v Speaker 4>banking and forced integration and all this horrible stuff and

22
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:09.000
<v Speaker 4>seems to come from the state, and I've always seemed

23
00:01:09.239 --> 00:01:12.519
<v Speaker 4>or I've always felt that libertarianism or anarchic capitalism or

24
00:01:12.519 --> 00:01:14.959
<v Speaker 4>whatever do you want to call it would be a

25
00:01:14.959 --> 00:01:18.079
<v Speaker 4>pretty you know, logical response to all that stuff like

26
00:01:18.239 --> 00:01:22.400
<v Speaker 4>reinforcing property rights and whatnot. What is I don't fully

27
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:25.120
<v Speaker 4>understand where you're coming from when you criticize libertarianism.

28
00:01:25.159 --> 00:01:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you can.

29
00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:30.239
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I have a question, are you are you? Are

30
00:01:30.280 --> 00:01:32.840
<v Speaker 5>you orthodox? First of all, I'm just was curious.

31
00:01:33.280 --> 00:01:37.439
<v Speaker 4>I have not converted yet, I'm planning on doing so.

32
00:01:37.879 --> 00:01:40.200
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot going on in my personal life right

33
00:01:40.280 --> 00:01:43.319
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, So I'm in. I talked to my

34
00:01:43.400 --> 00:01:47.840
<v Speaker 4>priests on a weekly basis and he's, uh, I had

35
00:01:47.879 --> 00:01:48.719
<v Speaker 4>to move to a town.

36
00:01:48.760 --> 00:01:50.719
<v Speaker 3>It's a long story, but I'm I'm getting there.

37
00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, so you're are you inquiring or are you a catechumen?

38
00:01:55.280 --> 00:01:57.159
<v Speaker 4>I am not a catechumen yet. I guess I guess

39
00:01:57.200 --> 00:01:59.959
<v Speaker 4>you would say I'm inquiring, but I was gotcha, gotcha?

40
00:02:00.120 --> 00:02:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Very recently my priest has very recently been urging me

41
00:02:03.159 --> 00:02:06.000
<v Speaker 4>to become a catechumen, and it's definitely like something I

42
00:02:06.040 --> 00:02:06.560
<v Speaker 4>really wanted to.

43
00:02:07.359 --> 00:02:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, I just I'll add.

44
00:02:09.159 --> 00:02:13.840
<v Speaker 6>This because I think it's just generally a correct Christian

45
00:02:13.879 --> 00:02:19.919
<v Speaker 6>principle and cleaveyord member that this came up when we

46
00:02:19.919 --> 00:02:26.520
<v Speaker 6>were talking last for Father Stephen Deyong about obedience, and

47
00:02:26.560 --> 00:02:30.080
<v Speaker 6>so clearly an Orthodoxy there's a stress on and it's

48
00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:33.360
<v Speaker 6>not blind obedience, right, but the notion of kind of

49
00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:37.960
<v Speaker 6>a hierarchy, and that you make yourself obedient to somebody,

50
00:02:38.120 --> 00:02:41.360
<v Speaker 6>not when you I'm only obedient when I agree. And

51
00:02:41.400 --> 00:02:43.280
<v Speaker 6>I was thinking about that, I'm like, well, that's really

52
00:02:43.280 --> 00:02:48.719
<v Speaker 6>interesting because that flies in the face of libertarianism. No,

53
00:02:48.879 --> 00:02:51.120
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't, based on voluntarism.

54
00:02:51.319 --> 00:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>That's wrong.

55
00:02:52.080 --> 00:02:58.840
<v Speaker 4>So libertarianism is libertarianism is fine with hierarchy if the

56
00:02:58.919 --> 00:03:00.479
<v Speaker 4>hierarchy is not coercive.

57
00:03:00.599 --> 00:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, yeah, that he's not talking about. He's not

58
00:03:03.560 --> 00:03:08.960
<v Speaker 2>talking about physical coercion. He's talking about within the church.

59
00:03:08.520 --> 00:03:14.960
<v Speaker 5>For example, Orthodox somehow, Yeah, Orthodox you would maintain that.

60
00:03:16.479 --> 00:03:21.400
<v Speaker 6>You're bound legally by secular even legal authorities, whether you

61
00:03:21.439 --> 00:03:22.280
<v Speaker 6>agree to it or not.

62
00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:25.080
<v Speaker 4>So that's interesting and that's not something that I've delved

63
00:03:25.120 --> 00:03:28.479
<v Speaker 4>into deep into too deeply myself. I have asked my

64
00:03:28.560 --> 00:03:31.280
<v Speaker 4>priest the question of like, well, how does what does

65
00:03:31.360 --> 00:03:33.919
<v Speaker 4>what does Orthodox you have to say about this, like

66
00:03:34.039 --> 00:03:37.479
<v Speaker 4>the role of the state or whatever. And he didn't

67
00:03:37.520 --> 00:03:39.400
<v Speaker 4>really He gave me an answer that was more like, oh, well,

68
00:03:39.439 --> 00:03:41.439
<v Speaker 4>like we don't endorse politicians at this church.

69
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:43.120
<v Speaker 3>I think he kind of misunderstood my question.

70
00:03:43.240 --> 00:03:49.039
<v Speaker 2>But so the role of church and state is a

71
00:03:49.800 --> 00:03:52.319
<v Speaker 2>classical Christian teaching that the state has a duty to

72
00:03:52.360 --> 00:03:54.680
<v Speaker 2>obey God into enact Christian principles.

73
00:03:54.759 --> 00:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the tradition of the church.

74
00:03:56.159 --> 00:03:59.280
<v Speaker 6>Okay, So, and there's a good document I'd recommend it

75
00:03:59.319 --> 00:04:02.400
<v Speaker 6>was a two thousand and it's from the Russian Church

76
00:04:03.080 --> 00:04:03.960
<v Speaker 6>a two thousand.

77
00:04:04.680 --> 00:04:06.879
<v Speaker 5>It was the Year of Jubilee.

78
00:04:06.599 --> 00:04:09.560
<v Speaker 6>On Relations of Church and State, where it kind of

79
00:04:09.560 --> 00:04:12.000
<v Speaker 6>defines these things and it admits that we live in

80
00:04:12.000 --> 00:04:15.680
<v Speaker 6>a fallen world. There's no kind of perfect in practice

81
00:04:17.319 --> 00:04:21.120
<v Speaker 6>form of government. But it does say that the only

82
00:04:21.560 --> 00:04:27.199
<v Speaker 6>in theory sanctioned form of government is monarchy. And in

83
00:04:27.319 --> 00:04:31.319
<v Speaker 6>principle absolutely the state has the right, is a God

84
00:04:31.360 --> 00:04:34.759
<v Speaker 6>given right to course force you against your will. And

85
00:04:34.959 --> 00:04:37.439
<v Speaker 6>so I was just thinking about it, like it's just

86
00:04:37.519 --> 00:04:40.319
<v Speaker 6>totally incompatible with libertarianism.

87
00:04:41.319 --> 00:04:43.079
<v Speaker 4>So what was that document called? You said it was

88
00:04:43.120 --> 00:04:45.160
<v Speaker 4>on Relations of Church and State? Who is that by

89
00:04:46.519 --> 00:04:47.399
<v Speaker 4>the Russian Church?

90
00:04:48.079 --> 00:04:55.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Russian Church Statement on Christian Government and nationalism. It's

91
00:04:55.319 --> 00:04:57.720
<v Speaker 2>just for stating kind of the classical view. But the

92
00:04:57.839 --> 00:05:01.199
<v Speaker 2>Church has always had a coronation service, which is a

93
00:05:01.279 --> 00:05:05.000
<v Speaker 2>quasi sacramental service for the anointing of a king. So

94
00:05:05.319 --> 00:05:09.000
<v Speaker 2>there's thousands of saints that are monarchists, thousands of saints

95
00:05:09.000 --> 00:05:13.319
<v Speaker 2>that have been under monarchies. They talk about Christian monarchy,

96
00:05:13.439 --> 00:05:15.720
<v Speaker 2>none of them talk about democracy, none of them talk

97
00:05:15.759 --> 00:05:18.879
<v Speaker 2>about libertarianism. So the mind of the saints, the mind

98
00:05:18.879 --> 00:05:21.680
<v Speaker 2>of the Church, is not classical liberalism out of the Enlightenment.

99
00:05:21.839 --> 00:05:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So you're saying, you're basically saying that the Church

100
00:05:25.800 --> 00:05:29.079
<v Speaker 4>advocates for monarchism. That's just not something that I'm that

101
00:05:29.879 --> 00:05:31.800
<v Speaker 4>aware of and the something I certainly need to do

102
00:05:31.839 --> 00:05:33.600
<v Speaker 4>more research than my own into sok.

103
00:05:34.439 --> 00:05:36.959
<v Speaker 2>Entire, entire history of the Church is the imperium, the

104
00:05:36.959 --> 00:05:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Byzantine imperium, So from Constantine all the way up to

105
00:05:40.720 --> 00:05:43.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, fourteen ninety three, nineteen niney three with the

106
00:05:43.199 --> 00:05:46.680
<v Speaker 2>fall of Constantinople, and then even after that the Russian

107
00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:49.680
<v Speaker 2>state has you know, there's a Christian state. So the

108
00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:54.839
<v Speaker 2>idea of a Christian state is Christianity. That's antithetical to

109
00:05:54.920 --> 00:05:58.000
<v Speaker 2>classical liberalism out of the Enlightenment. So but the stuff

110
00:05:58.040 --> 00:06:01.000
<v Speaker 2>that you mentioned is like, that's not really essentially libertarianism, right,

111
00:06:01.040 --> 00:06:04.720
<v Speaker 2>private property, that's based on the Tank Commandments. Uh, you know,

112
00:06:04.800 --> 00:06:07.439
<v Speaker 2>but the question of whether the state has a role

113
00:06:07.560 --> 00:06:11.279
<v Speaker 2>in one's life and whether God providentially established the state. Well,

114
00:06:11.319 --> 00:06:14.639
<v Speaker 2>in Romans thirteen, Paul says that Nero has the sword,

115
00:06:14.720 --> 00:06:15.839
<v Speaker 2>he is a diaconos.

116
00:06:16.720 --> 00:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Even if he doesn't act right, he is still the authority.

117
00:06:19.399 --> 00:06:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Are you saying that libertarianism doesn't advocate for property rights,

118
00:06:23.079 --> 00:06:23.959
<v Speaker 4>private property rights.

119
00:06:24.480 --> 00:06:26.199
<v Speaker 5>No, we're saying, oh, how.

120
00:06:26.040 --> 00:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Could you get anything like that from what I said.

121
00:06:28.000 --> 00:06:29.839
<v Speaker 3>I thought maybe I misarged you. I thought you said

122
00:06:30.279 --> 00:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>you were like.

123
00:06:31.199 --> 00:06:33.639
<v Speaker 5>That's not the defining simply the defining feature.

124
00:06:33.920 --> 00:06:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, So that's not orthodox especially property, private property rights.

125
00:06:38.800 --> 00:06:41.319
<v Speaker 5>It's based in the Ten Commandments, is what Jay was saying.

126
00:06:41.360 --> 00:06:46.240
<v Speaker 5>So you can't simply define libertarianism is in terms of

127
00:06:46.279 --> 00:06:49.639
<v Speaker 5>private property. And that's why I said libertarians is committed

128
00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:54.519
<v Speaker 5>to voluntarism, and voluntarism is rejected by orthodoxy. Now in

129
00:06:55.000 --> 00:06:59.600
<v Speaker 5>the Church there's voluntarism right, like, but that's what we

130
00:06:59.680 --> 00:07:05.160
<v Speaker 5>call is the way the church and ecclesiology works is

131
00:07:05.199 --> 00:07:07.519
<v Speaker 5>different than state because they're two different spheres. But the

132
00:07:07.600 --> 00:07:10.839
<v Speaker 5>Church ordains ideally.

133
00:07:11.839 --> 00:07:16.680
<v Speaker 6>You know, the king or the emperor, and that the

134
00:07:16.759 --> 00:07:20.560
<v Speaker 6>politicians are informed in terms of virtue in their.

135
00:07:20.439 --> 00:07:22.319
<v Speaker 5>Spiritual life by the Church.

136
00:07:22.480 --> 00:07:27.279
<v Speaker 6>But the way that the state can actually coerse it's like,

137
00:07:27.720 --> 00:07:31.600
<v Speaker 6>so voluntarism doesn't exist in an Orthodox state because the

138
00:07:31.639 --> 00:07:34.959
<v Speaker 6>state has the right to course you to do anything

139
00:07:34.959 --> 00:07:36.360
<v Speaker 6>by virtue of the law.

140
00:07:37.079 --> 00:07:40.120
<v Speaker 5>In the church practice, priests wouldn't do.

141
00:07:40.079 --> 00:07:43.879
<v Speaker 6>That, right, they have a prescriptive much like a doctor.

142
00:07:43.959 --> 00:07:46.720
<v Speaker 6>It's like, we prescribe that you do this, but you're

143
00:07:46.759 --> 00:07:49.279
<v Speaker 6>free to be wrong, and you're free to hurt yourself,

144
00:07:49.560 --> 00:07:52.079
<v Speaker 6>like we just recommend that you don't. So there's a

145
00:07:52.079 --> 00:07:54.120
<v Speaker 6>type of kind of voluntarism in the way of kind

146
00:07:54.120 --> 00:07:58.040
<v Speaker 6>of practice in the church. But in terms of state relations, absolutely,

147
00:07:58.040 --> 00:08:01.920
<v Speaker 6>the Orthodox Church believes the state and statesmen have the

148
00:08:02.040 --> 00:08:05.199
<v Speaker 6>right to course you by by law and power.

149
00:08:06.600 --> 00:08:07.839
<v Speaker 2>This off it comes up if you look at the

150
00:08:07.839 --> 00:08:09.439
<v Speaker 2>first debate I did ten years ago.

151
00:08:10.120 --> 00:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>It was with Adam Kokash, the libertarian dude.

152
00:08:13.639 --> 00:08:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, okay, well we we've go and check out our

153
00:08:16.000 --> 00:08:19.240
<v Speaker 2>debate from ten years One thing that one thing I

154
00:08:19.279 --> 00:08:22.000
<v Speaker 2>think is a good example of this is like, you

155
00:08:22.040 --> 00:08:26.079
<v Speaker 2>don't have the right in a Christian state to erect

156
00:08:26.079 --> 00:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>giant billboards of bastiality on your property because it's your property.

157
00:08:30.439 --> 00:08:31.839
<v Speaker 1>So even your property.

158
00:08:31.480 --> 00:08:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Has limitations on what you can do. And the state

159
00:08:34.120 --> 00:08:36.919
<v Speaker 2>has the right to tell you. No state has the

160
00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>right to enact the death penalty. All these things are

161
00:08:39.679 --> 00:08:41.679
<v Speaker 2>rights that the state has. Now, the state can go

162
00:08:41.799 --> 00:08:46.000
<v Speaker 2>out of its bound and become you know, rebellious and

163
00:08:46.039 --> 00:08:49.480
<v Speaker 2>become attempt to be godlike, but that's when the Christian

164
00:08:49.519 --> 00:08:53.159
<v Speaker 2>has the duty to be a martyr. Uh, And the

165
00:08:53.240 --> 00:08:55.639
<v Speaker 2>state has a duty to a higher authority who's to God.

166
00:08:55.759 --> 00:08:59.559
<v Speaker 4>So well, I'm glady, because my next question was going

167
00:08:59.639 --> 00:09:02.559
<v Speaker 4>to be like, how do you maintain a state that

168
00:09:02.720 --> 00:09:04.120
<v Speaker 4>is acting godly?

169
00:09:04.159 --> 00:09:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Like?

170
00:09:04.320 --> 00:09:06.960
<v Speaker 4>It seems to me that the state is very prone

171
00:09:07.000 --> 00:09:11.600
<v Speaker 4>to outgrowing the bounds that it was set for, and

172
00:09:11.799 --> 00:09:14.200
<v Speaker 4>it'll always.

173
00:09:13.159 --> 00:09:14.639
<v Speaker 1>That's always the temptation for the state.

174
00:09:14.720 --> 00:09:18.200
<v Speaker 2>But there's also countless Christian kings and saints in the

175
00:09:18.279 --> 00:09:20.840
<v Speaker 2>history of the Church who have had and maintained Christian kingdom,

176
00:09:20.919 --> 00:09:23.960
<v Speaker 2>so it has happened. But also you're right that there's

177
00:09:24.000 --> 00:09:26.799
<v Speaker 2>signs where the state goes outside the bounds of its

178
00:09:26.799 --> 00:09:29.120
<v Speaker 2>own authority and for example, tries to control the church,

179
00:09:29.360 --> 00:09:31.759
<v Speaker 2>right the American's deep state right now try to control

180
00:09:32.080 --> 00:09:34.759
<v Speaker 2>the Orthodox the Catholic Church during the Cold War.

181
00:09:35.320 --> 00:09:37.159
<v Speaker 1>So they stopped this all the time. So this is

182
00:09:37.159 --> 00:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true, right right?

183
00:09:39.039 --> 00:09:41.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Well this has been very eye opening for me,

184
00:09:41.240 --> 00:09:43.200
<v Speaker 4>this short interaction. I don't want to take up too

185
00:09:43.279 --> 00:09:48.600
<v Speaker 4>much time. And sorry, that's a great question at acting.

186
00:09:49.679 --> 00:09:51.919
<v Speaker 2>If you look up, I've got a lot of videos

187
00:09:51.960 --> 00:09:54.879
<v Speaker 2>critiquing you know, sort of the basic the Pratrian dug

188
00:09:54.919 --> 00:09:57.960
<v Speaker 2>ideas of perspective going back about ten years.

189
00:09:57.960 --> 00:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>But great questions.

190
00:09:58.679 --> 00:10:01.279
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate that, father, you get you didn't say much on

191
00:10:01.360 --> 00:10:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the preemptive strikes topic. Did you did you not want

192
00:10:04.080 --> 00:10:06.519
<v Speaker 2>to opine on that or is it too is that

193
00:10:06.559 --> 00:10:09.200
<v Speaker 2>too harry of a topic for clergy or what do

194
00:10:09.240 --> 00:10:09.759
<v Speaker 2>you think about that?

195
00:10:09.799 --> 00:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think Marco Rubio, is this never.

196
00:10:14.759 --> 00:10:17.919
<v Speaker 6>And it's kind of similar to it's kind of similar

197
00:10:17.960 --> 00:10:22.320
<v Speaker 6>to the libertarian kind of arguments about like well what

198
00:10:22.440 --> 00:10:27.240
<v Speaker 6>constitutes uh, you know, aggression and stuff like that. So look,

199
00:10:27.960 --> 00:10:30.320
<v Speaker 6>we can start with the clearcases and then move it's

200
00:10:30.360 --> 00:10:32.639
<v Speaker 6>going to get into you know, as you move farther

201
00:10:32.720 --> 00:10:35.159
<v Speaker 6>away from the clearcases, it gets muddied, and there are

202
00:10:35.440 --> 00:10:38.840
<v Speaker 6>obviously positions where I'm like, I don't know, but the

203
00:10:38.879 --> 00:10:42.759
<v Speaker 6>clearcas is obviously a pre exemptive strike is if there's

204
00:10:42.840 --> 00:10:46.080
<v Speaker 6>an imminent threatned physical danger.

205
00:10:46.480 --> 00:10:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Well but but the but if if but if you

206
00:10:49.120 --> 00:10:50.960
<v Speaker 2>see he said that before, he said that should have

207
00:10:50.960 --> 00:10:53.519
<v Speaker 2>happened fifty years ago, preempt to strikes. But I'm thinking, well,

208
00:10:53.519 --> 00:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute. If that's the basis for why you

209
00:10:56.480 --> 00:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>would do a preemptive strike is their capabilities to attack

210
00:10:59.320 --> 00:11:01.279
<v Speaker 2>the West, then you would essentially have to do a

211
00:11:01.320 --> 00:11:03.960
<v Speaker 2>preemptive strike on any country that's not aligned with the

212
00:11:04.000 --> 00:11:06.159
<v Speaker 2>West because they have the ability to attack the West.

213
00:11:07.080 --> 00:11:11.039
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and that's I've made that argument too, where you know,

214
00:11:11.440 --> 00:11:15.200
<v Speaker 6>there are some boomers like Iran's the greatest threat to America.

215
00:11:15.960 --> 00:11:17.679
<v Speaker 5>They're probably killing babies with.

216
00:11:17.720 --> 00:11:19.960
<v Speaker 6>Gas, right, like all this kind of stuff. I'm like, well,

217
00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:23.799
<v Speaker 6>first of all, make the argument without lyne. Right, I'm

218
00:11:23.799 --> 00:11:28.080
<v Speaker 6>not saying they're a great nation. But I brought up

219
00:11:28.120 --> 00:11:31.799
<v Speaker 6>that point too. Then why not the other nation? Like

220
00:11:31.799 --> 00:11:35.080
<v Speaker 6>like there's something not being truthful, right, if like if

221
00:11:35.120 --> 00:11:39.600
<v Speaker 6>that justifies and I'm not even against in principle, then.

222
00:11:39.519 --> 00:11:41.519
<v Speaker 2>We would have to do preemptive strikes on Russia, we

223
00:11:41.519 --> 00:11:45.120
<v Speaker 2>would have to do on North Korea, China, every country

224
00:11:45.200 --> 00:11:46.600
<v Speaker 2>would have to have premptive strikes.

225
00:11:46.720 --> 00:11:49.039
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and that's like, well, no, no, you can't do that.

226
00:11:49.080 --> 00:11:51.799
<v Speaker 6>So it just there's ways to show.

227
00:11:51.679 --> 00:11:54.480
<v Speaker 5>Like somebody's kind of inconsistency with But I.

228
00:11:54.399 --> 00:11:57.720
<v Speaker 6>Mean, first and foremost, if it really is an immin danger,

229
00:11:58.240 --> 00:12:03.799
<v Speaker 6>but also you know, there's probably you know, threats ideologically,

230
00:12:05.240 --> 00:12:09.519
<v Speaker 6>I think maybe in certain situations that might even address

231
00:12:09.600 --> 00:12:12.399
<v Speaker 6>even if somebody is not capable of having a physical

232
00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:15.039
<v Speaker 6>threat but could get to that point.

233
00:12:15.200 --> 00:12:17.799
<v Speaker 5>Maybe yeah, like maybe that would be justified.

234
00:12:17.840 --> 00:12:19.960
<v Speaker 6>But you see what I mean, It gets it gets

235
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:22.720
<v Speaker 6>more fuzzy the further you go out, and I feel

236
00:12:22.799 --> 00:12:26.519
<v Speaker 6>less confident in being like, well that's what I mean.

237
00:12:25.759 --> 00:12:28.879
<v Speaker 2>At the CAD, the Roman Calvic Church be a greater

238
00:12:30.360 --> 00:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>immediate threat because it's behind all the millions of undocumented

239
00:12:34.440 --> 00:12:36.840
<v Speaker 2>illegals coming in, even more so than Israel. So that

240
00:12:36.840 --> 00:12:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess we're supposed to like premptively strike the Vatican

241
00:12:39.159 --> 00:12:39.480
<v Speaker 2>or whatever.

242
00:12:39.559 --> 00:12:40.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, see what the problem is?

243
00:12:40.720 --> 00:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, like really.

244
00:12:42.720 --> 00:12:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Look to your level stuff and how do you determine

245
00:12:47.000 --> 00:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>like you're saying, like what the most dangerous imminent threat is,

246
00:12:51.440 --> 00:12:55.519
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, yeah, perhaps in ICBM if if it

247
00:12:55.639 --> 00:12:59.759
<v Speaker 2>hit the right target. But at the same time, it's like, well,

248
00:13:00.039 --> 00:13:03.720
<v Speaker 2>that's thirty forty fifty million illegals coming into the country.

249
00:13:04.399 --> 00:13:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how do you It's hard to determine, you see,

250
00:13:07.320 --> 00:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>which of those is quote worse right, Miles, what's up?

251
00:13:10.440 --> 00:13:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Hello? Yeah? What's up? Hey?

252
00:13:12.200 --> 00:13:12.759
<v Speaker 7>How's it going.

253
00:13:13.440 --> 00:13:17.080
<v Speaker 8>I'm baptized Eastern Orthodox and I'm trying to learn more

254
00:13:17.840 --> 00:13:21.559
<v Speaker 8>about it. So just a disclaimer, I might be asking

255
00:13:21.600 --> 00:13:23.600
<v Speaker 8>some very very basic and elementary questions.

256
00:13:23.879 --> 00:13:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Firs.

257
00:13:24.279 --> 00:13:25.919
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, if it's too basic, just let me know and

258
00:13:25.960 --> 00:13:27.600
<v Speaker 8>I can maybe go to somewhere that you can.

259
00:13:27.960 --> 00:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Everybody in here is a basic bitch, all right.

260
00:13:31.559 --> 00:13:34.799
<v Speaker 8>I wanted to ask, like, when when a priest blesses

261
00:13:34.840 --> 00:13:39.279
<v Speaker 8>let's say the anaphora or I take you know, holy water,

262
00:13:40.000 --> 00:13:42.519
<v Speaker 8>or I bless the house, what is it? What is happening?

263
00:13:42.559 --> 00:13:44.879
<v Speaker 8>What does a blessing mean? If I get blessed by

264
00:13:44.960 --> 00:13:46.559
<v Speaker 8>a bishop? What is blessing?

265
00:13:46.960 --> 00:13:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just supposed to signify, sanctifying, setting apart

266
00:13:50.799 --> 00:13:55.879
<v Speaker 2>for God's service and also hopefully a participation in the

267
00:13:55.919 --> 00:13:59.919
<v Speaker 2>divine energies, because we think that all of these sacramental reality,

268
00:14:00.120 --> 00:14:03.639
<v Speaker 2>whether they're icons or holy water or you know, being

269
00:14:03.679 --> 00:14:07.159
<v Speaker 2>annointed with oil, you know, we are looking towards and

270
00:14:07.240 --> 00:14:11.879
<v Speaker 2>praying to be participating in some measure of divine grace,

271
00:14:11.919 --> 00:14:13.320
<v Speaker 2>which is the unfitted energies.

272
00:14:13.960 --> 00:14:16.879
<v Speaker 7>Okay, so divine grace is the uncreated energies.

273
00:14:17.080 --> 00:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Correct?

274
00:14:18.200 --> 00:14:20.519
<v Speaker 7>What's a I only.

275
00:14:20.360 --> 00:14:23.360
<v Speaker 8>Understand the uncreated energies at a very introductory level.

276
00:14:23.879 --> 00:14:26.240
<v Speaker 7>What does it mean if I.

277
00:14:25.600 --> 00:14:28.879
<v Speaker 8>Have, like is, are the uncreated energies now in the

278
00:14:28.879 --> 00:14:29.480
<v Speaker 8>holy water?

279
00:14:29.600 --> 00:14:30.360
<v Speaker 7>Is that what that means?

280
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

281
00:14:31.679 --> 00:14:34.919
<v Speaker 2>Actually, in the baptism, right, the priest prays and puts

282
00:14:34.919 --> 00:14:37.879
<v Speaker 2>the cross in the water and asks that God's uncreated

283
00:14:37.960 --> 00:14:41.159
<v Speaker 2>energies come down into the font. So, just like in

284
00:14:41.279 --> 00:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Christ himself, you have, for example, the incarnation, a joining

285
00:14:44.919 --> 00:14:46.840
<v Speaker 2>of the human nature and the divine nature.

286
00:14:46.879 --> 00:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a synergy there.

287
00:14:48.720 --> 00:14:51.759
<v Speaker 2>So likewise, the same idea with the sacraments is that

288
00:14:51.799 --> 00:14:55.399
<v Speaker 2>there's a joining of the uncreated power of God to

289
00:14:55.679 --> 00:15:00.200
<v Speaker 2>the created elements of bread, wine, water, et cetera. The

290
00:15:00.240 --> 00:15:03.320
<v Speaker 2>idea is that there's a synergy a both and in

291
00:15:03.360 --> 00:15:06.000
<v Speaker 2>this in these sacraments.

292
00:15:05.440 --> 00:15:07.960
<v Speaker 8>Okay, and in that way, when I annoy myself with

293
00:15:08.000 --> 00:15:13.600
<v Speaker 8>oil or drink holy water, I'm directly experiencing God's and

294
00:15:13.679 --> 00:15:14.399
<v Speaker 8>created energies.

295
00:15:15.200 --> 00:15:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Well that's what we're praying for.

296
00:15:17.240 --> 00:15:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Whether or not we experience that is actually up to

297
00:15:19.879 --> 00:15:23.559
<v Speaker 2>ourselves on our own disposition. So God's energies are actually

298
00:15:23.600 --> 00:15:26.679
<v Speaker 2>everywhere present, and were we to be in the right

299
00:15:26.840 --> 00:15:30.639
<v Speaker 2>disposition and state of repentance, we would experience them. So

300
00:15:30.879 --> 00:15:33.480
<v Speaker 2>really that's up to us on our side of you know,

301
00:15:33.559 --> 00:15:36.320
<v Speaker 2>human action and repentance as to what we what we

302
00:15:36.440 --> 00:15:38.919
<v Speaker 2>get out of these rituals and liturgies.

303
00:15:39.399 --> 00:15:43.240
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so the same the same holy water could be

304
00:15:43.360 --> 00:15:45.679
<v Speaker 8>I don't know, edifying for me. Let's say if I'm

305
00:15:45.679 --> 00:15:48.440
<v Speaker 8>in a state of repentance and belief, but does absolutely

306
00:15:48.480 --> 00:15:50.360
<v Speaker 8>nothing to an atheist for example.

307
00:15:50.240 --> 00:15:53.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or it could actually drive them crazy if they're

308
00:15:53.320 --> 00:15:55.759
<v Speaker 2>demonically possessed, they could actually hate it.

309
00:15:55.799 --> 00:15:57.039
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, oh wow.

310
00:15:57.440 --> 00:15:59.600
<v Speaker 8>Okay, And so let's say I am in a state

311
00:15:59.600 --> 00:16:02.000
<v Speaker 8>of repent and belief and I have this holy water.

312
00:16:02.320 --> 00:16:05.279
<v Speaker 7>What happens to me? What actually changes?

313
00:16:05.639 --> 00:16:05.799
<v Speaker 9>Will?

314
00:16:05.840 --> 00:16:09.799
<v Speaker 2>The Church Fathers described the process of grace as a

315
00:16:09.879 --> 00:16:14.399
<v Speaker 2>never ending upward spiral into God. So basically, the Bible

316
00:16:14.399 --> 00:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>speaks in a kind of a mysterious way that we

317
00:16:17.159 --> 00:16:20.279
<v Speaker 2>partake of God in greater and greater measures, even though

318
00:16:20.320 --> 00:16:22.919
<v Speaker 2>God cannot be apportioned by measure. So this is kind

319
00:16:22.919 --> 00:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>of what's called it antonomical statement.

320
00:16:25.320 --> 00:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a statement that appears to be a contradiction, but.

321
00:16:28.120 --> 00:16:30.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not, because we're speaking about something that's above the

322
00:16:30.440 --> 00:16:33.080
<v Speaker 2>laws of logic. So even though God can't be contained,

323
00:16:33.720 --> 00:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>he still willed to become contained in the womb of

324
00:16:36.720 --> 00:16:40.519
<v Speaker 2>the Virgin. Even though God can't be apportioned out by measure,

325
00:16:41.000 --> 00:16:43.639
<v Speaker 2>he willed to be divided by measure amongst his saints.

326
00:16:43.840 --> 00:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>So Paul talks about in the Escaton greater and greater

327
00:16:48.039 --> 00:16:51.840
<v Speaker 2>degrees of deification. So there's a mystery involved in this,

328
00:16:52.320 --> 00:16:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and the mystery.

329
00:16:53.039 --> 00:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that you can never get full of God's grace.

330
00:16:56.440 --> 00:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You will always be infinitely moving into God's grace.

331
00:16:59.320 --> 00:17:02.240
<v Speaker 7>Uh okay, that makes sense. So okay.

332
00:17:01.919 --> 00:17:05.680
<v Speaker 8>The definition that I understand of uncreated energies is like

333
00:17:05.920 --> 00:17:08.119
<v Speaker 8>the word energy is God's actions.

334
00:17:08.200 --> 00:17:08.839
<v Speaker 7>Is that correct?

335
00:17:09.039 --> 00:17:11.319
<v Speaker 1>It's God's actions, It's God's mind.

336
00:17:11.480 --> 00:17:14.559
<v Speaker 2>It's excuse me, this God's divine ideas that are called

337
00:17:14.599 --> 00:17:18.559
<v Speaker 2>the logi. It's God's attributes, it's God's operations. All of

338
00:17:18.599 --> 00:17:23.279
<v Speaker 2>those things are at times called energies or works or operations.

339
00:17:23.880 --> 00:17:26.279
<v Speaker 2>So the word is welf means work and are gay

340
00:17:26.559 --> 00:17:30.200
<v Speaker 2>at work. But in the New Testament multiple things are

341
00:17:30.240 --> 00:17:34.920
<v Speaker 2>ascribed as works. Sometimes they're called God's powers plural.

342
00:17:35.480 --> 00:17:35.640
<v Speaker 10>Uh.

343
00:17:35.880 --> 00:17:38.319
<v Speaker 2>And then when the Western Church sometimes they say, you know,

344
00:17:38.400 --> 00:17:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the attributes of God for us, that's the same thing

345
00:17:40.680 --> 00:17:43.559
<v Speaker 2>as the divine energies. So when Jesus says, for example

346
00:17:43.640 --> 00:17:45.839
<v Speaker 2>John seventeen, that he came to give us a share

347
00:17:46.440 --> 00:17:48.440
<v Speaker 2>in the glory that he had with the Father before

348
00:17:48.440 --> 00:17:52.839
<v Speaker 2>the foundation of the world, uncreated glory is uncreated, grace

349
00:17:53.160 --> 00:17:56.440
<v Speaker 2>is uncreated, light is uncreated, love, et cetera, et cetera.

350
00:17:56.920 --> 00:18:00.119
<v Speaker 8>Okay, And so sorry, how do we define attrib You

351
00:18:00.200 --> 00:18:01.240
<v Speaker 8>see like God's attributes?

352
00:18:01.279 --> 00:18:03.880
<v Speaker 7>Is it like glory, light, love? Are those attributes?

353
00:18:04.720 --> 00:18:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Sure?

354
00:18:05.160 --> 00:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying the Western Church tends to talk about

355
00:18:07.799 --> 00:18:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the divine attributes. God has the attribute of omniscience, omnipresidence, love, justice,

356
00:18:13.039 --> 00:18:15.880
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. And all I'm saying is that when the

357
00:18:15.960 --> 00:18:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox Church says energies, they're referring to the same thing

358
00:18:18.720 --> 00:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>that they mean. But our theology is a little more

359
00:18:21.400 --> 00:18:25.359
<v Speaker 2>precise because it's also God's creative actions and powers that

360
00:18:25.400 --> 00:18:26.400
<v Speaker 2>are energies as well.

361
00:18:26.680 --> 00:18:30.319
<v Speaker 8>Okay, okay, because my confusion was I originally thought energies

362
00:18:30.359 --> 00:18:32.960
<v Speaker 8>men actions. And when you say that divine, his uncreated

363
00:18:33.039 --> 00:18:34.839
<v Speaker 8>energies are in like the holy water of the oil,

364
00:18:35.200 --> 00:18:38.400
<v Speaker 8>I think, how are someone's actions in a thing?

365
00:18:38.799 --> 00:18:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is that.

366
00:18:39.680 --> 00:18:41.880
<v Speaker 2>If you look at letter two thirty four, Basil says

367
00:18:41.920 --> 00:18:45.640
<v Speaker 2>God's essence is unknown, but the divine energies or operations

368
00:18:45.680 --> 00:18:46.599
<v Speaker 2>come down to us.

369
00:18:47.119 --> 00:18:48.759
<v Speaker 1>And so what comes down to us.

370
00:18:48.720 --> 00:18:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Is his love, his foreign alogy is providence, his power,

371
00:18:52.279 --> 00:18:56.359
<v Speaker 2>his mercy, et cetera. So it's referring to the same stuff. So,

372
00:18:56.480 --> 00:19:00.799
<v Speaker 2>for example, God is omnipresident omnipresence is a divine energy

373
00:19:00.839 --> 00:19:01.279
<v Speaker 2>for us.

374
00:19:01.480 --> 00:19:04.519
<v Speaker 8>Oh wow, okay, that's new to me. Okay, I think

375
00:19:04.599 --> 00:19:08.720
<v Speaker 8>I had just one more question and it just slipped

376
00:19:08.759 --> 00:19:13.279
<v Speaker 8>my mind. Oh okay, So the oil is blessed by

377
00:19:13.319 --> 00:19:16.400
<v Speaker 8>the priest when we annoyed ourselves water, you know, the house,

378
00:19:16.680 --> 00:19:18.440
<v Speaker 8>but when we I don't know if this is an

379
00:19:18.480 --> 00:19:18.960
<v Speaker 8>Orthodox thing.

380
00:19:18.960 --> 00:19:19.880
<v Speaker 7>At least I've been doing it.

381
00:19:20.200 --> 00:19:22.079
<v Speaker 8>You know, you kind of pray before a meal, ask

382
00:19:22.160 --> 00:19:24.000
<v Speaker 8>the Lord to bless the food and drink for a servant.

383
00:19:25.119 --> 00:19:30.720
<v Speaker 8>So can anybody bless because from what I understand, it's

384
00:19:30.720 --> 00:19:33.440
<v Speaker 8>always the priests that are blessing things. But I'm now blessing.

385
00:19:33.799 --> 00:19:36.440
<v Speaker 2>You're the priest of your household, right, so yes, you

386
00:19:36.880 --> 00:19:39.279
<v Speaker 2>can pray and bless the food. However, if a priest

387
00:19:39.319 --> 00:19:41.839
<v Speaker 2>is president, you defer to the higher authority, and the

388
00:19:41.880 --> 00:19:44.480
<v Speaker 2>priest blesses the food, just like the priest would defers

389
00:19:44.480 --> 00:19:45.839
<v Speaker 2>to the bishop of the bishops around.

390
00:19:46.400 --> 00:19:52.559
<v Speaker 8>Oh wow, okay, wow, all right, now, okay, I'm the

391
00:19:52.599 --> 00:19:53.519
<v Speaker 8>priest of the household.

392
00:19:53.759 --> 00:19:58.000
<v Speaker 7>Do you mean like as virtue of being a man

393
00:19:58.240 --> 00:19:59.640
<v Speaker 7>or like a man of the household?

394
00:20:00.400 --> 00:20:02.960
<v Speaker 8>Oh okay, okay, okay, So if I'm in like the

395
00:20:02.960 --> 00:20:05.640
<v Speaker 8>presence of my wife, I should be the one asking.

396
00:20:06.720 --> 00:20:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Says that the house hold is a little church.

397
00:20:10.559 --> 00:20:14.119
<v Speaker 11>So yes, great, wow, okay a j thank you so much.

398
00:20:14.119 --> 00:20:18.319
<v Speaker 11>I really appreciate I appreciate the thank you. Yeah, okay, care,

399
00:20:18.359 --> 00:20:21.920
<v Speaker 11>I appreciate it, aid he can you hear me, Jake Aiden?

400
00:20:22.000 --> 00:20:23.160
<v Speaker 11>And then Jay, Yeah, what's up?

401
00:20:24.160 --> 00:20:26.119
<v Speaker 12>I had a little bit of a question about the

402
00:20:26.480 --> 00:20:28.359
<v Speaker 12>like Iran more in a little bit to do with

403
00:20:28.960 --> 00:20:33.799
<v Speaker 12>the elites. If that's all right, sure, So, like I know,

404
00:20:34.720 --> 00:20:37.119
<v Speaker 12>if I'm correct, both are of course the right wing

405
00:20:37.160 --> 00:20:40.440
<v Speaker 12>you had, like the heavy Zionist fund by Israel and

406
00:20:40.480 --> 00:20:43.480
<v Speaker 12>the Rothschild's Like is the left the same way?

407
00:20:44.119 --> 00:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Would you say, what do you mean, like, uh.

408
00:20:46.720 --> 00:20:50.039
<v Speaker 12>Is it like the same elites? You would say behind

409
00:20:50.440 --> 00:20:52.119
<v Speaker 12>the left ultimately.

410
00:20:52.319 --> 00:20:56.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, for example, left socialism that supports Palestinians. I mean,

411
00:20:56.839 --> 00:21:00.400
<v Speaker 2>they might have a difference on the issue of Israel self,

412
00:21:00.559 --> 00:21:03.359
<v Speaker 2>but in the big picture they're all still pretty much

413
00:21:03.839 --> 00:21:07.680
<v Speaker 2>under the aegis and the banner of globalization. So there's

414
00:21:07.680 --> 00:21:10.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of disagreement, but in the long term, no,

415
00:21:10.559 --> 00:21:14.319
<v Speaker 2>it's just a disagreement over whether you know, there'll be

416
00:21:15.160 --> 00:21:17.559
<v Speaker 2>an Israeli priority to the new world order or will

417
00:21:17.599 --> 00:21:20.599
<v Speaker 2>there be some sort of just international socialists United Nations

418
00:21:20.640 --> 00:21:21.680
<v Speaker 2>style technocracy.

419
00:21:22.559 --> 00:21:25.279
<v Speaker 12>So just like two different sides of the puzzle.

420
00:21:25.079 --> 00:21:28.119
<v Speaker 2>I would say, two factions of internationalism or two factions

421
00:21:28.160 --> 00:21:30.759
<v Speaker 2>of how they would like to see.

422
00:21:30.599 --> 00:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>The future cut. There's also overlap.

423
00:21:33.720 --> 00:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>There's also over lot because all the early Zionists were

424
00:21:36.720 --> 00:21:39.599
<v Speaker 2>all socialists. So yeah, I think socialism, you know, is

425
00:21:39.640 --> 00:21:44.720
<v Speaker 2>always kind of bound up with a lot of Jewish worldview.

426
00:21:45.039 --> 00:21:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Ideology and in terms of its origins and ethos, I mean,

427
00:21:49.960 --> 00:21:51.759
<v Speaker 2>it's not totally bound up with that, because you can

428
00:21:51.799 --> 00:21:54.400
<v Speaker 2>find it in Plato. A lot of modern socialism marks

429
00:21:54.400 --> 00:21:59.440
<v Speaker 2>within communism obviously is oftentimes tied with you know, Jewish

430
00:21:59.480 --> 00:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>type movement Bolsheviks, et cetera, as well as utopian socialism

431
00:22:04.519 --> 00:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>coming out of Moses has the forefather of modern Zionism.

432
00:22:08.440 --> 00:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So those things overlap.

433
00:22:10.519 --> 00:22:13.920
<v Speaker 2>But you might have some internationalists who don't even think

434
00:22:13.920 --> 00:22:15.680
<v Speaker 2>there should be a nation's date. They don't care if

435
00:22:15.680 --> 00:22:18.039
<v Speaker 2>there's a nation state of Israel, whereas others think that

436
00:22:18.240 --> 00:22:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Israel itself could be the center of the future world government.

437
00:22:23.079 --> 00:22:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Many of the Zionist writers wrote that way Joe Ziowa's up, dog.

438
00:22:26.640 --> 00:22:27.079
<v Speaker 9>Do you hear me?

439
00:22:27.200 --> 00:22:28.279
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Man? Hey man?

440
00:22:28.279 --> 00:22:32.000
<v Speaker 9>I was just asking, so my wife and I she

441
00:22:32.079 --> 00:22:36.799
<v Speaker 9>went to her first divine energy this past Sunday. Okay,

442
00:22:37.440 --> 00:22:40.880
<v Speaker 9>I've been this probably my fourth time this week. So

443
00:22:40.960 --> 00:22:46.240
<v Speaker 9>she is you know, we're used to a Pentecostal type environment,

444
00:22:46.480 --> 00:22:49.359
<v Speaker 9>charismatic and what is the easiest way to I mean,

445
00:22:49.400 --> 00:22:52.119
<v Speaker 9>I've heard not to even really even try to debate her,

446
00:22:52.359 --> 00:22:57.240
<v Speaker 9>you know, but just the Mary stuff and the saints.

447
00:22:58.240 --> 00:22:58.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

448
00:22:58.519 --> 00:23:00.759
<v Speaker 9>Sorry if I sound that out of us, I'm at

449
00:23:00.759 --> 00:23:01.599
<v Speaker 9>the gym.

450
00:23:01.319 --> 00:23:04.079
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, go ahead and repeat your question. I'm sorry.

451
00:23:04.200 --> 00:23:08.839
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, just what would your advice be on guiding

452
00:23:08.880 --> 00:23:14.000
<v Speaker 9>her into the what seems to be very weird environment

453
00:23:14.119 --> 00:23:16.559
<v Speaker 9>of liturgy and saints and all that.

454
00:23:17.039 --> 00:23:17.960
<v Speaker 5>I guess that's the question.

455
00:23:18.119 --> 00:23:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I mean, I guess that really just depends on

456
00:23:20.079 --> 00:23:22.960
<v Speaker 2>how interested in the theology she is, or is she

457
00:23:23.119 --> 00:23:26.240
<v Speaker 2>just kind of looking for community. A lot of times

458
00:23:26.440 --> 00:23:29.359
<v Speaker 2>women and wives and girlfriends aren't that interested in the theology.

459
00:23:29.359 --> 00:23:33.200
<v Speaker 2>They're more interested in meeting nice people. So, or is

460
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:35.319
<v Speaker 2>she interested in theology and she wants to know why

461
00:23:35.359 --> 00:23:37.440
<v Speaker 2>we do what we do? It depends on who she

462
00:23:37.559 --> 00:23:38.759
<v Speaker 2>is and how she operates.

463
00:23:38.960 --> 00:23:41.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I would say I'm the one that's more interested

464
00:23:41.640 --> 00:23:44.759
<v Speaker 9>in the theology. But at the same time, I feel

465
00:23:44.799 --> 00:23:48.000
<v Speaker 9>like that door is popping open here here and there

466
00:23:48.079 --> 00:23:48.920
<v Speaker 9>when he.

467
00:23:48.960 --> 00:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Could explain that.

468
00:23:50.000 --> 00:23:52.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, like when I went on that podcast with

469
00:23:52.680 --> 00:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>that evangelical dude a couple of days ago that he

470
00:23:55.319 --> 00:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>just posted yesterday. I mean, he was asking very similar questions,

471
00:23:58.920 --> 00:24:02.039
<v Speaker 2>kind of coming from a evangelical, you know, do it

472
00:24:02.079 --> 00:24:05.279
<v Speaker 2>yourself background, and it's like, well, do we ever think

473
00:24:05.319 --> 00:24:08.440
<v Speaker 2>about how did Jesus himself worship the Father. Well, he

474
00:24:08.519 --> 00:24:11.319
<v Speaker 2>went to the temple, into the synagogue, and he worshiped

475
00:24:11.839 --> 00:24:17.039
<v Speaker 2>in an ordered liturgical way. They didn't worship like Charismatics

476
00:24:17.039 --> 00:24:20.359
<v Speaker 2>and Pentecostals do with hooting and hollering and flopping around

477
00:24:20.400 --> 00:24:24.279
<v Speaker 2>and barking and yapping and laughing. None of that is

478
00:24:24.319 --> 00:24:28.839
<v Speaker 2>the way that God laid down worship all the way

479
00:24:28.880 --> 00:24:31.920
<v Speaker 2>back to the very beginning. So even Abraham, you know,

480
00:24:31.960 --> 00:24:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Abraham built an altar and called upon God. So there's

481
00:24:36.119 --> 00:24:40.839
<v Speaker 2>always been an altar and liturgical worship for the God

482
00:24:40.880 --> 00:24:43.359
<v Speaker 2>of the Bible. And if you don't have that, then

483
00:24:43.400 --> 00:24:46.640
<v Speaker 2>you've got something else. And you know, worship, if you

484
00:24:46.640 --> 00:24:49.480
<v Speaker 2>read Leviticus ten and eleven, is very important to God.

485
00:24:49.680 --> 00:24:52.599
<v Speaker 2>And if the New Testament doesn't give us a liturgical

486
00:24:52.640 --> 00:24:56.000
<v Speaker 2>worship service, then why would he leave us kind of hanging?

487
00:24:56.079 --> 00:24:57.759
<v Speaker 2>Why is it all up in the air. Why do

488
00:24:57.839 --> 00:24:59.680
<v Speaker 2>we have to just figure it out? Like wouldn't there

489
00:24:59.720 --> 00:25:03.359
<v Speaker 2>be a pattern of worship laid down? And I think

490
00:25:03.359 --> 00:25:06.640
<v Speaker 2>if you start asking those kinds of questions, you know

491
00:25:06.720 --> 00:25:09.079
<v Speaker 2>that kind of when I was Protestant, those kinds of

492
00:25:09.160 --> 00:25:12.519
<v Speaker 2>questions began to click with me because I was like, well,

493
00:25:13.039 --> 00:25:15.400
<v Speaker 2>if I believe in solar scriptia, it doesn't it seem

494
00:25:15.440 --> 00:25:19.480
<v Speaker 2>like God would have laid down the specific like there

495
00:25:19.480 --> 00:25:21.680
<v Speaker 2>would be a new text, you know, a letter from

496
00:25:21.720 --> 00:25:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Paul about how to do the liturgy or something. But

497
00:25:24.799 --> 00:25:27.200
<v Speaker 2>you don't have that, So there's a reliance on the

498
00:25:27.240 --> 00:25:28.440
<v Speaker 2>history of the tradition of the church.

499
00:25:28.559 --> 00:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But also, you know, when.

500
00:25:30.440 --> 00:25:33.799
<v Speaker 2>It comes to speaking in tongues, I mean, in the

501
00:25:33.799 --> 00:25:35.920
<v Speaker 2>New Testament, that's always languages.

502
00:25:36.000 --> 00:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It's never gibberish.

503
00:25:38.119 --> 00:25:42.599
<v Speaker 2>It's never a so called angel language.

504
00:25:43.079 --> 00:25:43.519
<v Speaker 1>Sorry.

505
00:25:43.799 --> 00:25:46.279
<v Speaker 9>She asked me about that specifically, and when I told

506
00:25:46.319 --> 00:25:49.440
<v Speaker 9>her with an as church believe the way you were

507
00:25:49.480 --> 00:25:52.839
<v Speaker 9>talking about that, she was like, thank God because she

508
00:25:52.880 --> 00:25:54.279
<v Speaker 9>always thought, you know.

509
00:25:54.440 --> 00:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, it sounds like she's on the right path.

510
00:25:56.920 --> 00:26:00.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I remember at one time I thought that

511
00:26:00.319 --> 00:26:03.519
<v Speaker 2>Paul was saying there's a secret prayer language that you say,

512
00:26:03.559 --> 00:26:06.880
<v Speaker 2>that's gibberish. But then I realized, right when he says that,

513
00:26:06.920 --> 00:26:10.480
<v Speaker 2>he's actually just using rhetoric. He's saying, even if I

514
00:26:10.519 --> 00:26:14.119
<v Speaker 2>speak with the tongue of ben and angels, then if

515
00:26:14.119 --> 00:26:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't have love, it's worthless. He's not saying there's

516
00:26:16.680 --> 00:26:20.880
<v Speaker 2>actually a secret angel language that you can learn by yapping,

517
00:26:20.920 --> 00:26:24.319
<v Speaker 2>and then some other Pentecostal pastor stands next to you

518
00:26:24.359 --> 00:26:27.799
<v Speaker 2>and quote translates it. It's just silly, but great, great

519
00:26:27.880 --> 00:26:30.240
<v Speaker 2>question at the age you want to comment on Pentecostal stuff.

520
00:26:30.279 --> 00:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Also, I don't know if you guys saw the stream.

521
00:26:32.319 --> 00:26:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I just did. Tell your wife to watch Testament of

522
00:26:35.799 --> 00:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>ann Lee.

523
00:26:36.759 --> 00:26:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I've been telling people, all of you with Pentecostal cares.

524
00:26:39.960 --> 00:26:42.759
<v Speaker 2>My friends tell your tell them to watch that movie,

525
00:26:43.559 --> 00:26:46.279
<v Speaker 2>and then after they watch the movie, say so, don't

526
00:26:46.279 --> 00:26:48.480
<v Speaker 2>you think this is kind of crazy?

527
00:26:49.079 --> 00:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>It's like, oh, yeah, well that's what you guys.

528
00:26:51.559 --> 00:26:54.200
<v Speaker 6>I was gonna add that I think was the Those

529
00:26:54.279 --> 00:26:58.039
<v Speaker 6>questions were the start of me, you know, twenty years ago,

530
00:26:58.359 --> 00:27:02.240
<v Speaker 6>even twenty five thirty years ago, moving into Orthodoxy because

531
00:27:03.440 --> 00:27:06.640
<v Speaker 6>having grown up in Calviy chapels that have kind of

532
00:27:07.200 --> 00:27:10.160
<v Speaker 6>depending on what Calvi Chapel does has kind.

533
00:27:10.039 --> 00:27:14.319
<v Speaker 5>Of more charismatic flares and different places. But it rubbed

534
00:27:14.319 --> 00:27:18.759
<v Speaker 5>me the wrong way. And I remember asking questions, liturgical questions,

535
00:27:18.839 --> 00:27:22.720
<v Speaker 5>even at eighteen years old. Can you just worship however

536
00:27:22.759 --> 00:27:24.359
<v Speaker 5>you want? Is there a standard?

537
00:27:24.559 --> 00:27:27.799
<v Speaker 6>And that eventually, you know, many many many years later,

538
00:27:27.960 --> 00:27:29.680
<v Speaker 6>led me to Orthodoxy.

539
00:27:30.119 --> 00:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely questions and answers. What's up?

540
00:27:32.759 --> 00:27:36.720
<v Speaker 14>Go ahead, Hey, Jay, thanks for taking me. I just

541
00:27:36.759 --> 00:27:41.319
<v Speaker 14>have a question. I grew up Protestant, and I've heard

542
00:27:41.400 --> 00:27:47.640
<v Speaker 14>you talk about classical Protestantism, specifically you know, Luther and

543
00:27:47.799 --> 00:27:51.880
<v Speaker 14>other major figures of the Reformation, and the difference of

544
00:27:51.920 --> 00:27:57.759
<v Speaker 14>what they think or thought about certain topics versus what

545
00:27:57.960 --> 00:28:01.920
<v Speaker 14>many Protestants today hold to or are against that are

546
00:28:02.079 --> 00:28:04.640
<v Speaker 14>Orthodox or Catholic doctrines. I was wondering if you could

547
00:28:04.720 --> 00:28:07.400
<v Speaker 14>just give me a couple of those that you feel

548
00:28:07.440 --> 00:28:12.519
<v Speaker 14>are the most significant or impactful.

549
00:28:12.559 --> 00:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess say it really quick again. What was the first?

550
00:28:14.799 --> 00:28:18.359
<v Speaker 2>What's the difference between modern reform or modern evangelicals and

551
00:28:18.400 --> 00:28:19.799
<v Speaker 2>classical Reformation guys.

552
00:28:20.559 --> 00:28:22.200
<v Speaker 14>Yes, yeah, that's pretty good summary.

553
00:28:22.319 --> 00:28:24.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, I did the last stream that I did for

554
00:28:24.160 --> 00:28:27.880
<v Speaker 2>members on this very topic, which was that, basically my

555
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:30.799
<v Speaker 2>thesis is that the radical Reformation is what ended up

556
00:28:30.799 --> 00:28:35.000
<v Speaker 2>winning out most of the magisterial reformers.

557
00:28:34.359 --> 00:28:36.559
<v Speaker 1>And what we know of as the classical Reformation.

558
00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:40.079
<v Speaker 2>Guys, their churches and their theology has pretty much died out.

559
00:28:40.799 --> 00:28:42.119
<v Speaker 1>And what you see in a lot.

560
00:28:41.960 --> 00:28:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Of these evangelical churches, non denominational megachurches is really no

561
00:28:47.079 --> 00:28:51.880
<v Speaker 2>different than the overall ethos of the Radical Reformation people,

562
00:28:51.960 --> 00:28:55.559
<v Speaker 2>because again go watch Testamon van Lee. She believes that

563
00:28:55.599 --> 00:28:58.960
<v Speaker 2>there's an inner guiding light. It's telling her what to do.

564
00:28:59.079 --> 00:29:01.400
<v Speaker 2>The scriptures don't or that much. All that matters is

565
00:29:01.440 --> 00:29:05.160
<v Speaker 2>their personal relationship with Jesus. She's gonna he's going to

566
00:29:05.200 --> 00:29:08.319
<v Speaker 2>be a pacifist, She's going to try to set up

567
00:29:08.359 --> 00:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>an earthly commune. I mean, all of the ridiculous teachings

568
00:29:12.000 --> 00:29:17.759
<v Speaker 2>of evangelicalism and charismaticism are actually what the Radical Reformation taught.

569
00:29:17.799 --> 00:29:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And by radical information we mean people like George Fox,

570
00:29:21.680 --> 00:29:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the Quakers, the Anabaptists, the Shakers.

571
00:29:24.680 --> 00:29:24.799
<v Speaker 15>Right.

572
00:29:25.319 --> 00:29:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh, that's the proto Pentecostals and Charismatics and Evangelicals today.

573
00:29:30.680 --> 00:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>If you look at the mainline Reformers in their churches,

574
00:29:34.440 --> 00:29:36.039
<v Speaker 2>like they're all dying and dead and all.

575
00:29:36.039 --> 00:29:37.279
<v Speaker 1>They're all gay churches. Right.

576
00:29:37.319 --> 00:29:41.000
<v Speaker 2>So you have the pc USA, uh, mainline Presbyterians.

577
00:29:41.039 --> 00:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>You have the Lutheran Church, Anglicans.

578
00:29:44.440 --> 00:29:47.559
<v Speaker 2>The mainline Anglicans, mainline Lutherans, those are all dying out

579
00:29:47.599 --> 00:29:52.559
<v Speaker 2>and they're all ordaining you know, trans bishops and all nonsense.

580
00:29:53.119 --> 00:29:56.480
<v Speaker 14>So yeah, the archbishop of Canterbury is like a woman.

581
00:29:56.559 --> 00:29:59.839
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeah, that just happened two days ago, but you

582
00:29:59.880 --> 00:30:01.400
<v Speaker 2>know what, everybody's laughing about that.

583
00:30:01.480 --> 00:30:04.359
<v Speaker 1>But actually they already had a woman head of the church.

584
00:30:04.400 --> 00:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>For the last hundred years.

585
00:30:05.400 --> 00:30:06.920
<v Speaker 2>The queen was the head of the church, so they

586
00:30:06.960 --> 00:30:08.440
<v Speaker 2>already had a female head of the church.

587
00:30:08.480 --> 00:30:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, it's true. That's that's true. Okay, well, thank you

588
00:30:12.880 --> 00:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>very much.

589
00:30:13.240 --> 00:30:16.759
<v Speaker 2>I think the big difference is that even the product

590
00:30:16.839 --> 00:30:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the mainline evangelicals, which are the majority now I guess

591
00:30:19.920 --> 00:30:24.839
<v Speaker 2>nowadays of Protestants, I'm guessing they don't care about really

592
00:30:25.000 --> 00:30:29.119
<v Speaker 2>the so called classical Reformation doctrines except for something like,

593
00:30:30.000 --> 00:30:33.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, some water down idea of faith alone, or

594
00:30:33.119 --> 00:30:36.680
<v Speaker 2>some water down idea of I just followed my Bible,

595
00:30:36.799 --> 00:30:40.359
<v Speaker 2>which is some version of soul Scripture, right, so I think, right,

596
00:30:40.559 --> 00:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that's where evangelicalism is today.

597
00:30:43.039 --> 00:30:44.480
<v Speaker 14>Okay, thank you very much.

598
00:30:44.640 --> 00:30:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is interesting because it's pretty far removed from

599
00:30:47.039 --> 00:30:50.319
<v Speaker 2>Lutheran Calvin, right, I mean Lutheran Calvin. You could perhaps

600
00:30:50.359 --> 00:30:53.400
<v Speaker 2>make the argument that they may be Lutheran more so

601
00:30:53.480 --> 00:30:57.680
<v Speaker 2>than Calvin, Like they're more close to Orthodox and Catholicism

602
00:30:58.480 --> 00:31:02.839
<v Speaker 2>than they are to the radical reformers in certain respects, right, father,

603
00:31:02.880 --> 00:31:06.839
<v Speaker 2>you can do everything on reformation teaching and today's evangelicals.

604
00:31:07.640 --> 00:31:10.599
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, Luther wasn't an iconoclast.

605
00:31:11.079 --> 00:31:14.359
<v Speaker 6>He had at least two seconds believed in the real presence,

606
00:31:17.599 --> 00:31:24.720
<v Speaker 6>the old Lutheran liturgies are much higher liturgically. It's you know,

607
00:31:25.279 --> 00:31:29.079
<v Speaker 6>modern Lutherans today unless you go to Germany or something

608
00:31:29.160 --> 00:31:29.559
<v Speaker 6>like that.

609
00:31:29.680 --> 00:31:30.799
<v Speaker 5>But they're all gay.

610
00:31:31.599 --> 00:31:35.799
<v Speaker 6>The higher liturgical kind of Lutherans are all woke and stuff.

611
00:31:35.960 --> 00:31:40.119
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, they're a lot closer than to too orthodoxy

612
00:31:41.039 --> 00:31:45.000
<v Speaker 6>than you know, the Lutherans than modern Humangelicals for sure.

613
00:31:45.119 --> 00:31:46.839
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we were driving out here the other day.

614
00:31:46.880 --> 00:31:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you heard me say this on

615
00:31:48.000 --> 00:31:51.519
<v Speaker 2>the stream FDA, but I was actually Jamie was like, hey,

616
00:31:51.559 --> 00:31:53.960
<v Speaker 2>this is a Zuza Street who were literally on his

617
00:31:54.039 --> 00:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Zusa Street where the whole Pentecostal movement.

618
00:31:56.960 --> 00:32:00.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, how crazy is that? Well it wasn't far

619
00:32:00.400 --> 00:32:03.200
<v Speaker 5>from actually where we ain't exactly.

620
00:32:03.319 --> 00:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I realize that of course, right wing. What's up

621
00:32:05.880 --> 00:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you want on you? Hey, thanks for having me up.

622
00:32:08.079 --> 00:32:09.799
<v Speaker 16>You're killing it with all the collapse by the way,

623
00:32:09.839 --> 00:32:11.960
<v Speaker 16>great stuff, Well, well guess what.

624
00:32:12.640 --> 00:32:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Only about like one tenth of it has actually dropped yet,

625
00:32:16.599 --> 00:32:19.759
<v Speaker 2>so nice. If you're liking the collapse, there's about ten more.

626
00:32:19.880 --> 00:32:22.720
<v Speaker 16>So I was just wondering your opinion on the new

627
00:32:22.759 --> 00:32:26.319
<v Speaker 16>Anglican archbishop and how the ceremony was on the twenty fifth,

628
00:32:26.599 --> 00:32:29.519
<v Speaker 16>which is their feasting and annunciation. There's there's got to

629
00:32:29.599 --> 00:32:33.000
<v Speaker 16>be some compounded underlying heresy or symbolism to why they

630
00:32:33.079 --> 00:32:35.200
<v Speaker 16>chose that day, right, I.

631
00:32:35.119 --> 00:32:37.599
<v Speaker 2>Didn't even know that, and I haven't. All I saw

632
00:32:37.720 --> 00:32:39.720
<v Speaker 2>was people making fun of it on Twitter. But my

633
00:32:39.799 --> 00:32:43.440
<v Speaker 2>guess would be, well, this is the idea that the

634
00:32:43.480 --> 00:32:47.319
<v Speaker 2>feminine is now replacing the masculine. Right, and again, go

635
00:32:47.400 --> 00:32:50.680
<v Speaker 2>watch Testamon of van Lee, because she says the future

636
00:32:50.680 --> 00:32:54.680
<v Speaker 2>of Christianity is that women will replace what the men did.

637
00:32:54.759 --> 00:32:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Because she says.

638
00:32:56.559 --> 00:32:59.559
<v Speaker 2>God is man and God is woman, and if he

639
00:32:59.599 --> 00:33:02.480
<v Speaker 2>came the first time as a man, he must return

640
00:33:02.559 --> 00:33:04.680
<v Speaker 2>as a woman. And so she taught that she was

641
00:33:04.680 --> 00:33:08.279
<v Speaker 2>the second advent of Christ, but as the Holy Spirit.

642
00:33:08.359 --> 00:33:11.039
<v Speaker 2>So she's like the incarnation of the Spirit, which she

643
00:33:11.119 --> 00:33:14.119
<v Speaker 2>thought was feminine, which is odd because.

644
00:33:14.480 --> 00:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>She couldn't read.

645
00:33:15.599 --> 00:33:18.720
<v Speaker 2>But it's almost like she's repeating these Talmudic doctrines that

646
00:33:18.759 --> 00:33:22.039
<v Speaker 2>God is bisexual and that God has a you know,

647
00:33:22.119 --> 00:33:25.160
<v Speaker 2>female body parts, all this kind of crazy nonsense. My

648
00:33:25.240 --> 00:33:29.480
<v Speaker 2>guess would be that it's the same demonic spirit that's

649
00:33:29.559 --> 00:33:32.160
<v Speaker 2>influencing the heretics of today.

650
00:33:32.799 --> 00:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Bird are you there? Go ahead?

651
00:33:34.119 --> 00:33:38.880
<v Speaker 17>My question is about the residue of sin. So, like

652
00:33:39.000 --> 00:33:42.559
<v Speaker 17>I've heard people say that sin doesn't have a positive ontology,

653
00:33:43.039 --> 00:33:47.079
<v Speaker 17>but it seems like committing sins leaves some sort of

654
00:33:47.160 --> 00:33:51.079
<v Speaker 17>like it's called like a spore or like something unclean

655
00:33:51.119 --> 00:33:52.440
<v Speaker 17>that needs to be washed away.

656
00:33:52.759 --> 00:33:56.279
<v Speaker 1>And now that's all that's that's gnostic, Maybe that's Manichian.

657
00:33:56.880 --> 00:33:59.559
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, you could have an addiction or a

658
00:33:59.599 --> 00:34:03.319
<v Speaker 2>passion that you are tempted with, but there's no such

659
00:34:03.359 --> 00:34:06.920
<v Speaker 2>thing as an ontological thing that has to be watched life.

660
00:34:07.039 --> 00:34:11.920
<v Speaker 17>So when like when Noah gets off the arc and

661
00:34:12.760 --> 00:34:15.320
<v Speaker 17>he makes atonement for the land, like it's kind of

662
00:34:15.360 --> 00:34:18.519
<v Speaker 17>portrayed in a sense that like this the sins of

663
00:34:18.559 --> 00:34:20.559
<v Speaker 17>the or like if you have an Orthodox priest come

664
00:34:20.559 --> 00:34:23.239
<v Speaker 17>to your house and bless it is that not to

665
00:34:23.320 --> 00:34:27.440
<v Speaker 17>deal with like some sort of effect of the sin

666
00:34:27.480 --> 00:34:29.559
<v Speaker 17>that's been committed in that house, or.

667
00:34:30.000 --> 00:34:31.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean you could you could say that there's

668
00:34:32.079 --> 00:34:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the presence of evil spirits. That's what's being cleansed. But

669
00:34:35.400 --> 00:34:38.320
<v Speaker 2>there's not residue of evil or something like that. That

670
00:34:38.920 --> 00:34:41.599
<v Speaker 2>evil doesn't have to even even the demons in their

671
00:34:41.719 --> 00:34:45.760
<v Speaker 2>nature are still good, but they use their will and

672
00:34:45.800 --> 00:34:50.679
<v Speaker 2>their their powers constantly for things against God. So it's

673
00:34:50.719 --> 00:34:54.079
<v Speaker 2>the actions that are the bad. Part is not some

674
00:34:54.440 --> 00:34:56.840
<v Speaker 2>thing or some I don't know what you would call it.

675
00:34:57.199 --> 00:35:00.639
<v Speaker 2>And you know there's no substance or there's no gack,

676
00:35:00.719 --> 00:35:02.159
<v Speaker 2>there's no nickelodeon gack.

677
00:35:02.519 --> 00:35:04.679
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, that's kind of what I'm asking. Is there like

678
00:35:04.719 --> 00:35:07.239
<v Speaker 17>an ick ontology.

679
00:35:06.880 --> 00:35:10.000
<v Speaker 2>That would be not it would be menichi and you

680
00:35:10.039 --> 00:35:11.639
<v Speaker 2>could do incorrect actions.

681
00:35:11.679 --> 00:35:15.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean even if you think like biologically, like with

682
00:35:15.440 --> 00:35:20.039
<v Speaker 6>a plant or something that do you put it in

683
00:35:20.199 --> 00:35:24.320
<v Speaker 6>bad soil, or like you do something that harms a

684
00:35:24.400 --> 00:35:27.360
<v Speaker 6>plant or something so that it's leaves shrivel up and

685
00:35:28.159 --> 00:35:33.000
<v Speaker 6>something like that, Obviously you're not creating a substance. You're

686
00:35:33.000 --> 00:35:35.360
<v Speaker 6>doing something that's not good for the plant. So you

687
00:35:35.400 --> 00:35:39.719
<v Speaker 6>can damage things. Demons can damage stuff. We can damage

688
00:35:39.719 --> 00:35:44.039
<v Speaker 6>stuff by not you know, doing the right sorts of things.

689
00:35:44.159 --> 00:35:46.480
<v Speaker 6>And that's just you know, even the biological sphere, but

690
00:35:46.559 --> 00:35:49.519
<v Speaker 6>like also morally, but it doesn't mean that there's like

691
00:35:49.880 --> 00:35:52.639
<v Speaker 6>there's some evil substance on the plant or in the

692
00:35:52.679 --> 00:35:54.039
<v Speaker 6>house or something like that.

693
00:35:54.559 --> 00:35:57.719
<v Speaker 17>I'm just wondering from a perspective of like the wages

694
00:35:57.760 --> 00:35:59.920
<v Speaker 17>of sin, like what you earn through sin is death,

695
00:36:00.679 --> 00:36:05.920
<v Speaker 17>Like where's the transition between the sinful action and or

696
00:36:05.920 --> 00:36:08.800
<v Speaker 17>am I just taking are we talking about spiritual death?

697
00:36:08.880 --> 00:36:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Like I sometimes.

698
00:36:10.079 --> 00:36:13.639
<v Speaker 2>Death is death is the severance of the soul from

699
00:36:13.679 --> 00:36:17.199
<v Speaker 2>the body, and it's you know, the person willing against

700
00:36:17.280 --> 00:36:20.159
<v Speaker 2>God and it gets the good. That's the first is

701
00:36:20.159 --> 00:36:22.960
<v Speaker 2>physical death, second spiritual death. So that's all death is.

702
00:36:23.039 --> 00:36:24.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, Thank you guys. I appreciate it. Yeah, that

703
00:36:24.760 --> 00:36:28.480
<v Speaker 2>those great questions.

704
00:36:28.119 --> 00:36:30.800
<v Speaker 6>Substance, it's the lack of life. So you can do

705
00:36:30.960 --> 00:36:37.800
<v Speaker 6>actions two things that kill something kill yourself both physically,

706
00:36:38.159 --> 00:36:42.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, or biologically and spiritually too. But like, yeah,

707
00:36:42.000 --> 00:36:44.840
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't mean death is an actually thing that you

708
00:36:44.880 --> 00:36:47.920
<v Speaker 6>can trap in a jar and you know, take it

709
00:36:48.000 --> 00:36:50.199
<v Speaker 6>to show and tell and class and stuff like that.

710
00:36:50.400 --> 00:36:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Or like you could give somebody death cooties and then

711
00:36:53.400 --> 00:36:55.880
<v Speaker 2>they have the death on them that gets cooties.

712
00:36:56.800 --> 00:36:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh. It's funny you.

713
00:36:57.679 --> 00:37:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Say the FDA because one of the one of the

714
00:37:00.800 --> 00:37:04.400
<v Speaker 2>parts of the discussion with Jesse Lee Peterson was where

715
00:37:04.519 --> 00:37:06.000
<v Speaker 2>he started because what he I don't know if you've

716
00:37:06.039 --> 00:37:07.840
<v Speaker 2>ever seen what he does, but he basically asked you

717
00:37:07.880 --> 00:37:11.119
<v Speaker 2>all these really bizarre kind of questions that are really

718
00:37:11.199 --> 00:37:14.119
<v Speaker 2>ambiguous leading questions because he wants to get you to

719
00:37:14.599 --> 00:37:17.599
<v Speaker 2>understand and accept his kind of weird process of what

720
00:37:17.639 --> 00:37:20.360
<v Speaker 2>he thinks counseling is spiritual counseling.

721
00:37:21.000 --> 00:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So ask all these.

722
00:37:21.880 --> 00:37:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Questions like do you have your your mama sins nature?

723
00:37:25.920 --> 00:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, my, what do you have? You have

724
00:37:28.599 --> 00:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>your ma sin nature?

725
00:37:30.039 --> 00:37:33.159
<v Speaker 2>She put that in you and I'm like, well, there's

726
00:37:33.199 --> 00:37:34.920
<v Speaker 2>not a sin nature, Yes there is.

727
00:37:35.400 --> 00:37:36.079
<v Speaker 1>For your mama.

728
00:37:37.239 --> 00:37:39.280
<v Speaker 2>It's like, there was no way I was going to

729
00:37:39.480 --> 00:37:41.960
<v Speaker 2>ever be able to explain to him that, Like well,

730
00:37:42.800 --> 00:37:44.559
<v Speaker 2>I said, well sin doesn't have any being.

731
00:37:44.679 --> 00:37:46.280
<v Speaker 1>He's like, what do you mean being?

732
00:37:46.960 --> 00:37:49.760
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, that's well.

733
00:37:49.800 --> 00:37:55.480
<v Speaker 6>It's interesting because Protestantism is influenced by that kind of

734
00:37:55.519 --> 00:37:57.599
<v Speaker 6>man a ken where they you know, you get it

735
00:37:57.599 --> 00:38:01.559
<v Speaker 6>from Calvin to you and like a sin nature. It's

736
00:38:01.639 --> 00:38:06.639
<v Speaker 6>like that entails that they're a positive being to see

737
00:38:06.880 --> 00:38:08.159
<v Speaker 6>when it's actually a privation.

738
00:38:08.559 --> 00:38:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Right. But the funny thing about Jesse Peter Lee.

739
00:38:10.880 --> 00:38:12.719
<v Speaker 2>Peterson's view of it was that, you know, most people

740
00:38:12.719 --> 00:38:15.000
<v Speaker 2>who are are Protestants or whatever, they think the sin

741
00:38:15.159 --> 00:38:16.719
<v Speaker 2>nature has passed from Adam right.

742
00:38:17.360 --> 00:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>He thinks that it's a thing that the mom.

743
00:38:21.119 --> 00:38:26.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh, interests, it's really bizarre, Scott, what's up?

744
00:38:27.079 --> 00:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Just I'm you, guys when you I'm you when you

745
00:38:28.880 --> 00:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>come up. Yeah.

746
00:38:29.920 --> 00:38:33.199
<v Speaker 18>Sure, I think these strikes were justified. I assume you

747
00:38:33.239 --> 00:38:34.079
<v Speaker 18>sort of disagree.

748
00:38:34.239 --> 00:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how would we know what? What? What justifies them?

749
00:38:38.119 --> 00:38:38.239
<v Speaker 12>Well?

750
00:38:38.280 --> 00:38:40.639
<v Speaker 18>I just mean from like geopolitical facts. I don't mean

751
00:38:40.679 --> 00:38:41.880
<v Speaker 18>from an epostomach.

752
00:38:41.440 --> 00:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Basic what well, No, I mean morally speaking, it's it

753
00:38:45.440 --> 00:38:46.039
<v Speaker 1>is preempted.

754
00:38:46.039 --> 00:38:49.480
<v Speaker 18>But I think you can justify preemptive strikes in many cases.

755
00:38:50.119 --> 00:38:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And what why would Israel be in the US

756
00:38:52.840 --> 00:38:54.800
<v Speaker 2>be justified INTI strikes?

757
00:38:54.840 --> 00:38:58.679
<v Speaker 18>I don't I'm not like defending associations with Israel or

758
00:38:58.679 --> 00:39:01.719
<v Speaker 18>any of that. I just mean from here from American interests.

759
00:39:01.880 --> 00:39:04.559
<v Speaker 1>But okay, well, what would the American interesting? So I

760
00:39:04.679 --> 00:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>ran had.

761
00:39:06.800 --> 00:39:09.440
<v Speaker 18>Well, apparently they launched at Diego Garcias. It means they

762
00:39:09.519 --> 00:39:13.960
<v Speaker 18>had ICBMs that were up to four thousand kilometers I believe,

763
00:39:14.079 --> 00:39:15.760
<v Speaker 18>I don't know the exact Heart, but that that would

764
00:39:15.800 --> 00:39:18.199
<v Speaker 18>reach Western Europe as well if they reached Diego, Garcia.

765
00:39:18.840 --> 00:39:22.559
<v Speaker 18>And they claimed at least to have two hundred kilograms

766
00:39:22.760 --> 00:39:25.719
<v Speaker 18>or thereabouts of sixty percent uranium, which I'm not a

767
00:39:25.800 --> 00:39:28.960
<v Speaker 18>nuclear scientist, but they say that's something like ten or

768
00:39:29.000 --> 00:39:29.800
<v Speaker 18>eleven warheads.

769
00:39:29.920 --> 00:39:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but they don't have the ability to launch those

770
00:39:32.039 --> 00:39:34.760
<v Speaker 2>even if they did. According to Kerioka, they have.

771
00:39:34.719 --> 00:39:38.320
<v Speaker 18>At least one with four thousand, like they launched at

772
00:39:38.360 --> 00:39:41.159
<v Speaker 18>least one ICBM at four thousand kilometers. I didn't actually

773
00:39:41.159 --> 00:39:42.280
<v Speaker 18>watch the Kariaka.

774
00:39:41.960 --> 00:39:43.840
<v Speaker 5>One, so I guess I'm a little uninformed there.

775
00:39:44.000 --> 00:39:48.559
<v Speaker 2>How are you Ortho bro Oca supremacist? That doesn't make

776
00:39:48.559 --> 00:39:50.719
<v Speaker 2>any sense? Sorry, how are you? I don't believe you're

777
00:39:50.719 --> 00:39:53.480
<v Speaker 2>who you say you are, Ortho Broo Eastern mystic o.

778
00:39:53.920 --> 00:39:55.719
<v Speaker 5>So those are just pejoratives I've been called.

779
00:39:55.760 --> 00:39:56.599
<v Speaker 1>This is a little joke.

780
00:39:56.880 --> 00:39:59.679
<v Speaker 2>And is there any precedent for preemptive strikes in the

781
00:39:59.760 --> 00:40:01.719
<v Speaker 2>history of like Christian warfare?

782
00:40:02.920 --> 00:40:06.199
<v Speaker 18>I I don't think there is, but I think that

783
00:40:06.280 --> 00:40:09.960
<v Speaker 18>like logically you can extend you know, like proportionality to

784
00:40:10.039 --> 00:40:12.920
<v Speaker 18>preemptive strikes in some ways, I mean, but but no

785
00:40:12.960 --> 00:40:14.920
<v Speaker 18>there to answer your question, No, I don't think there's

786
00:40:14.960 --> 00:40:18.679
<v Speaker 18>an exact like uh one to one with like.

787
00:40:19.119 --> 00:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that that Israel would provoke this at all?

788
00:40:22.440 --> 00:40:24.840
<v Speaker 18>I go back and I think there's obviously there's some

789
00:40:24.920 --> 00:40:27.719
<v Speaker 18>influence with Israel, but I think that in this case

790
00:40:27.920 --> 00:40:30.920
<v Speaker 18>it's overlapping interest with the range of the ICBMs, a

791
00:40:30.960 --> 00:40:32.519
<v Speaker 18>potential range if.

792
00:40:32.360 --> 00:40:35.039
<v Speaker 1>It you know, if indeed that those could carry their ward.

793
00:40:34.800 --> 00:40:36.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, butt this was that the Well, then why wasn't

794
00:40:36.679 --> 00:40:37.760
<v Speaker 2>this done twenty years ago?

795
00:40:37.800 --> 00:40:39.119
<v Speaker 18>If that was the case, I think it should have

796
00:40:39.119 --> 00:40:43.079
<v Speaker 18>probably been done prior, but probably when the shot was deposed,

797
00:40:43.239 --> 00:40:44.840
<v Speaker 18>so like it should have been done with a better

798
00:40:44.880 --> 00:40:48.039
<v Speaker 18>causus belly, but it wasn't, and I think the problems

799
00:40:48.079 --> 00:40:50.440
<v Speaker 18>went bestering for I think it's almost fifty years, forty

800
00:40:50.440 --> 00:40:55.159
<v Speaker 18>seven years, that's so. I think it's kind of we

801
00:40:55.199 --> 00:40:57.400
<v Speaker 18>had we had to make a decision at a point

802
00:40:57.400 --> 00:41:00.400
<v Speaker 18>in time now where they would gain according to market

803
00:41:00.639 --> 00:41:02.840
<v Speaker 18>immunity from future strikes.

804
00:41:02.920 --> 00:41:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Marco Rubio is a reliable source?

805
00:41:06.239 --> 00:41:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you'd have to Okay, why is why is

806
00:41:09.320 --> 00:41:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Marco Rubio reliable source?

807
00:41:10.960 --> 00:41:13.800
<v Speaker 18>Well, I mean, obviously everyone in any given administration has

808
00:41:13.880 --> 00:41:14.800
<v Speaker 18>been trying to BELI to.

809
00:41:14.719 --> 00:41:18.079
<v Speaker 1>You, why is Marco Rubio a reliable source?

810
00:41:18.719 --> 00:41:20.960
<v Speaker 18>Because I think that there would be more leaks if

811
00:41:21.000 --> 00:41:27.559
<v Speaker 18>you was like objectly lying about just neutrality or the blocking.

812
00:41:27.639 --> 00:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm moving on, Maddie, what's up?

813
00:41:29.320 --> 00:41:30.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to listen to some dude who says he's

814
00:41:30.920 --> 00:41:36.400
<v Speaker 2>an OCA sparentcys Madie, what's up? That's that feels like

815
00:41:36.480 --> 00:41:40.320
<v Speaker 2>fed energy because he's got a giant Confederate flag with

816
00:41:40.400 --> 00:41:42.519
<v Speaker 2>Biden and she says he's an OI.

817
00:41:45.519 --> 00:41:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Maddie, what's up? FDA? Do you have any comments on that?

818
00:41:47.840 --> 00:41:48.800
<v Speaker 1>That was odd? No?

819
00:41:48.800 --> 00:41:49.320
<v Speaker 5>No comment?

820
00:41:49.679 --> 00:41:54.280
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, was popping my dog. Congratulations on the on the

821
00:41:54.280 --> 00:41:56.320
<v Speaker 15>podcast too. I've been fairly enjoying it over here in

822
00:41:56.360 --> 00:42:01.840
<v Speaker 15>the UK. It's been amazing to watch. There's more questions, father,

823
00:42:02.000 --> 00:42:04.360
<v Speaker 15>I heard last week or the week beforehand. Maybe you

824
00:42:04.440 --> 00:42:12.440
<v Speaker 15>spoke upon Agent's video about the whole possible hoax with

825
00:42:12.559 --> 00:42:18.599
<v Speaker 15>the Holy Separaka and Holy fire issues associated the Jerusalem Patriarch.

826
00:42:19.559 --> 00:42:20.119
<v Speaker 8>Is that correct?

827
00:42:21.679 --> 00:42:24.360
<v Speaker 5>As I think it was.

828
00:42:25.079 --> 00:42:28.239
<v Speaker 6>Jane and I had one of these things, these spaces,

829
00:42:28.320 --> 00:42:29.159
<v Speaker 6>and it was brought up.

830
00:42:29.199 --> 00:42:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Somebody was doubt I didn't know who was doubting it.

831
00:42:31.679 --> 00:42:36.000
<v Speaker 6>I didn't know it was agents, and I made a

832
00:42:36.000 --> 00:42:39.199
<v Speaker 6>comment about why I think it's legitimate.

833
00:42:39.360 --> 00:42:44.280
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I watched the video just out of curiosity, and

834
00:42:45.599 --> 00:42:48.039
<v Speaker 15>I mean, from what I can say, I don't see

835
00:42:48.119 --> 00:42:50.199
<v Speaker 15>it doesn't seem to me that he's kind of imposed

836
00:42:50.239 --> 00:42:53.639
<v Speaker 15>any sort of his personal opinion on the story. But

837
00:42:53.960 --> 00:42:55.840
<v Speaker 15>I just wanted to know whether or not it's true

838
00:42:55.920 --> 00:42:59.440
<v Speaker 15>or not. I spoke to my spiritual father at church

839
00:42:59.480 --> 00:43:01.360
<v Speaker 15>a Sunday to try and get his view.

840
00:43:01.239 --> 00:43:01.880
<v Speaker 5>Up on things.

841
00:43:02.360 --> 00:43:04.760
<v Speaker 15>Not because it caused any particularly down inside of me,

842
00:43:04.800 --> 00:43:07.599
<v Speaker 15>but I want to understand if there would be any

843
00:43:07.639 --> 00:43:13.000
<v Speaker 15>sort of issues or repercussions with people faith wise. It's

844
00:43:13.079 --> 00:43:17.119
<v Speaker 15>not necessarily the case that even if, for instance, hypothetically

845
00:43:17.159 --> 00:43:20.280
<v Speaker 15>this was proven that maybe this has been a hoax

846
00:43:20.360 --> 00:43:23.079
<v Speaker 15>for maybe all of time, but maybe a certain period

847
00:43:23.079 --> 00:43:27.960
<v Speaker 15>of time, that this would jeopardize individuals in the church.

848
00:43:28.280 --> 00:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think.

849
00:43:29.440 --> 00:43:31.719
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it's like you said, it's necessary that

850
00:43:31.800 --> 00:43:35.599
<v Speaker 6>it's not a dogma or something like that. Is there's

851
00:43:35.639 --> 00:43:39.159
<v Speaker 6>no good reasons I do not believe it. I've never

852
00:43:39.280 --> 00:43:44.320
<v Speaker 6>heard all of them have been kind of debunked or

853
00:43:44.519 --> 00:43:46.880
<v Speaker 6>just to just kind of ad hoc, and only the

854
00:43:46.880 --> 00:43:50.440
<v Speaker 6>best sort of reasons to believe that it's actually legitimate.

855
00:43:50.960 --> 00:43:53.840
<v Speaker 5>But I mean, again, it's not binding on It's not

856
00:43:53.880 --> 00:43:56.000
<v Speaker 5>like you have to believe it to be orthodox.

857
00:43:57.199 --> 00:44:00.639
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's just I mean, given the content annuity, how

858
00:44:00.679 --> 00:44:03.960
<v Speaker 6>far it goes back? And I mean think about the critiques,

859
00:44:04.239 --> 00:44:10.239
<v Speaker 6>they're very much like the kind of atheistic critiques of like, yeah,

860
00:44:10.280 --> 00:44:15.880
<v Speaker 6>the Resurrection, Like they have that same kind of spirit that, oh,

861
00:44:15.960 --> 00:44:20.480
<v Speaker 6>we have to like everybody's conspiring and this is I mean,

862
00:44:20.960 --> 00:44:25.679
<v Speaker 6>it just gets ridiculous the amount of ad hoc kind

863
00:44:25.719 --> 00:44:32.639
<v Speaker 6>of skeptical arguments and reconstruction to explain what obviously seems

864
00:44:32.679 --> 00:44:36.320
<v Speaker 6>the case that it's the continuity, the fact that they

865
00:44:36.320 --> 00:44:38.599
<v Speaker 6>didn't have lighters or anything back in the day, and

866
00:44:38.639 --> 00:44:40.800
<v Speaker 6>what it would actually take to fake something like that.

867
00:44:40.880 --> 00:44:45.039
<v Speaker 6>It's just it's virtually almost impossible to you, So that.

868
00:44:46.639 --> 00:44:47.840
<v Speaker 5>Skeptical arguments.

869
00:44:48.480 --> 00:44:52.599
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, yeah, honess what you're saying. Yeah, I guess it's

870
00:44:52.639 --> 00:44:55.440
<v Speaker 15>one of those things where I guess, like you said,

871
00:44:55.440 --> 00:44:58.039
<v Speaker 15>even if for instance, it was the case, and I'm

872
00:44:58.440 --> 00:45:03.000
<v Speaker 15>certain that will Agent said is true or the arguments

873
00:45:03.039 --> 00:45:04.679
<v Speaker 15>he brings up are true, But if I was to

874
00:45:04.920 --> 00:45:10.079
<v Speaker 15>hyperfectly agree this wasn't, this wouldn't necessarily put all one's

875
00:45:10.119 --> 00:45:12.119
<v Speaker 15>faith in jeopardy because it's not contingent upon that, nor

876
00:45:12.199 --> 00:45:15.239
<v Speaker 15>is a dogma. I think this is good for me

877
00:45:15.360 --> 00:45:17.800
<v Speaker 15>to clear up. Not that I had any explicit doubts,

878
00:45:17.840 --> 00:45:19.320
<v Speaker 15>but it's one of those things what kind of popped

879
00:45:19.400 --> 00:45:23.280
<v Speaker 15>up where it's like this. It's an interesting point of view.

880
00:45:25.000 --> 00:45:27.480
<v Speaker 15>But yeah, I appreciate your time, Father. It does reassure me.

881
00:45:27.920 --> 00:45:28.119
<v Speaker 6>Jay.

882
00:45:29.400 --> 00:45:31.840
<v Speaker 15>When are you coming? When is all the whole streaming

883
00:45:33.440 --> 00:45:35.760
<v Speaker 15>like podcast thing coming to an end, or when you're

884
00:45:35.760 --> 00:45:40.239
<v Speaker 15>gonna be back at the gaff? Okay, cool, all right,

885
00:45:40.920 --> 00:45:43.360
<v Speaker 15>I would like to see more cringe. Course, been a

886
00:45:43.400 --> 00:45:45.079
<v Speaker 15>bit minute since we heard the last one.

887
00:45:45.119 --> 00:45:53.039
<v Speaker 1>Bro, I've been hopefully get back. What's up? Appreciate philth

888
00:45:53.159 --> 00:45:56.760
<v Speaker 1>what's up? Object? Go ahead? Hey?

889
00:45:57.039 --> 00:46:00.440
<v Speaker 19>MYA was going down the rabbit hole of p S

890
00:46:00.519 --> 00:46:05.280
<v Speaker 19>A and a sacrificial system, and I had asked father

891
00:46:05.360 --> 00:46:08.280
<v Speaker 19>Stephen de Young. I think it was on Alex Alex's

892
00:46:08.280 --> 00:46:12.280
<v Speaker 19>stream or maybe cleavestream about the implied sacrifice and Jennifer

893
00:46:12.440 --> 00:46:15.960
<v Speaker 19>Genesis three with the animal skins and how he clothed them,

894
00:46:16.199 --> 00:46:18.559
<v Speaker 19>and he answered, and I'd never heard it before, and

895
00:46:18.639 --> 00:46:21.079
<v Speaker 19>I was wondering if you ever heard it that the

896
00:46:21.639 --> 00:46:28.800
<v Speaker 19>the skins that God clothed Adam and Eve with were

897
00:46:29.800 --> 00:46:34.440
<v Speaker 19>him actually changing their body from the pre fall state into.

898
00:46:34.519 --> 00:46:37.760
<v Speaker 2>The biological it's the biological skin suit that we presently have.

899
00:46:38.039 --> 00:46:40.320
<v Speaker 2>As many church fathers say that, oh, guy, I just

900
00:46:40.360 --> 00:46:44.519
<v Speaker 2>didn't heard before tonight. I recalled it because I remember

901
00:46:44.599 --> 00:46:48.000
<v Speaker 2>you in a debate arguing with that one like weird

902
00:46:48.360 --> 00:46:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Christian vegan guy, and you use that as a I

903
00:46:53.079 --> 00:46:56.239
<v Speaker 2>get the point for as a rebuttal to his that

904
00:46:56.480 --> 00:46:59.039
<v Speaker 2>saying that you know, we can't even meet you use

905
00:46:59.119 --> 00:47:01.800
<v Speaker 2>that or that applyed sacrifice is the reason that we

906
00:47:02.679 --> 00:47:03.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's fine.

907
00:47:03.960 --> 00:47:07.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. Yeah, But whether or not God is

908
00:47:07.760 --> 00:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>clothing us with animal.

909
00:47:09.000 --> 00:47:12.199
<v Speaker 2>Skin suits to have biological bodies, or whether he's killing

910
00:47:12.239 --> 00:47:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the animal for a meal, covenantal meal, the principle is

911
00:47:15.760 --> 00:47:16.079
<v Speaker 2>still the.

912
00:47:16.079 --> 00:47:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Same, that God is not empathetical to the killing of animals. Gotcha, Okay, cool,

913
00:47:20.679 --> 00:47:20.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you.

914
00:47:21.039 --> 00:47:22.719
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, that yeah, the church fathers not

915
00:47:22.840 --> 00:47:26.039
<v Speaker 2>unanimous either on that interpretation. And if you'll notice, if

916
00:47:26.039 --> 00:47:28.280
<v Speaker 2>you read through their commentaries, some of them think that

917
00:47:29.000 --> 00:47:32.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a metaphysical change in their being to have kind.

918
00:47:32.119 --> 00:47:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Of a biological component.

919
00:47:34.360 --> 00:47:37.840
<v Speaker 2>That's like an animal has with these bodies versus the

920
00:47:38.039 --> 00:47:39.960
<v Speaker 2>type of body that they might have had in the

921
00:47:40.000 --> 00:47:41.599
<v Speaker 2>Garden of Eden, which was some sort of a higher

922
00:47:41.639 --> 00:47:42.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of spiritual body.

923
00:47:43.079 --> 00:47:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Aiden, Yeah, go ahead.

924
00:47:44.239 --> 00:47:50.039
<v Speaker 12>Time One is about like Orthodox patristic series, which would

925
00:47:50.079 --> 00:47:54.719
<v Speaker 12>you recommend first, Dmitri Stineiloi's Experience of God or yourself

926
00:47:54.800 --> 00:47:58.960
<v Speaker 12>Pelicans a Church and tradition. I believe, I know you've

927
00:47:59.079 --> 00:48:00.840
<v Speaker 12>made a video on the well.

928
00:48:00.880 --> 00:48:04.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Father Saint Eloy's is not Patristics. It's his

929
00:48:04.360 --> 00:48:07.880
<v Speaker 2>own dogmatic theology. So that's more like reading a pretty

930
00:48:07.880 --> 00:48:12.440
<v Speaker 2>advanced systematic theology. But Pelicon series is really good for

931
00:48:12.559 --> 00:48:16.960
<v Speaker 2>getting an overview of the ideological trek of the debates

932
00:48:17.000 --> 00:48:19.239
<v Speaker 2>of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth century. So

933
00:48:19.440 --> 00:48:22.519
<v Speaker 2>I would say, actually both would compliment one another. But

934
00:48:22.559 --> 00:48:24.920
<v Speaker 2>if you're new to Orthodoxy, I think Stunnyeloy would be

935
00:48:25.039 --> 00:48:27.320
<v Speaker 2>very difficult, so you might want to start with something

936
00:48:27.360 --> 00:48:29.519
<v Speaker 2>more like Palma Zansky before study.

937
00:48:30.239 --> 00:48:30.519
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

938
00:48:31.599 --> 00:48:37.800
<v Speaker 12>Second was on like Orthodox philosophical, like philosophical readings of

939
00:48:37.880 --> 00:48:41.800
<v Speaker 12>the Orthodox influence behind it, if you know what I mean.

940
00:48:43.679 --> 00:48:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean Orthodoxy is not super interested in philosophy, but

941
00:48:47.519 --> 00:48:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean there are Orthodox philosophers like Tristan Inglehart or

942
00:48:51.079 --> 00:48:56.360
<v Speaker 2>David doctor David Bradshaw or doctor Bo Branson. I mean,

943
00:48:56.400 --> 00:49:00.880
<v Speaker 2>those are all modern philosophy professors who are influenced by

944
00:49:01.079 --> 00:49:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox teaching.

945
00:49:03.079 --> 00:49:05.519
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I'm not what do you mean exactly

946
00:49:05.599 --> 00:49:06.639
<v Speaker 1>by Orthodox philosophy.

947
00:49:07.719 --> 00:49:10.760
<v Speaker 12>I mean like kind of a less Western views, like

948
00:49:10.840 --> 00:49:11.159
<v Speaker 12>there's no.

949
00:49:11.360 --> 00:49:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox Nietsche, you know, that's walking. There's not like an

950
00:49:14.880 --> 00:49:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox you know, Emmanuel Kant or something like that.

951
00:49:18.280 --> 00:49:21.519
<v Speaker 12>Where would you recommend, Like, I'm a I'm a current

952
00:49:21.639 --> 00:49:24.519
<v Speaker 12>cate Cuman. Your content has helped me out a lot

953
00:49:24.559 --> 00:49:27.920
<v Speaker 12>of but where would you recommend the individual to start?

954
00:49:28.239 --> 00:49:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you were interested in philosophy, I would read

955
00:49:31.119 --> 00:49:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the Yarslaw Pelicon book Metamorphosis of Natural Theology and the Cappadocians.

956
00:49:37.320 --> 00:49:40.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I saw that. Yeah, that's really good. Yeah, I

957
00:49:40.119 --> 00:49:40.360
<v Speaker 1>saw that.

958
00:49:40.440 --> 00:49:43.960
<v Speaker 12>When your video is uh yeah, I've kind of analyzed

959
00:49:44.039 --> 00:49:45.960
<v Speaker 12>like all your videos in but before you.

960
00:49:46.039 --> 00:49:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Do that, I would actually, uh, now that you kind

961
00:49:49.480 --> 00:49:51.199
<v Speaker 2>of asked these questions, I think you would probably do

962
00:49:51.320 --> 00:49:53.760
<v Speaker 2>best to start with the Pelicon volume one, because it's

963
00:49:53.800 --> 00:49:55.880
<v Speaker 2>really good, and volume two is really good too.

964
00:49:55.920 --> 00:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I would do one and two. Three is about the Reformation,

965
00:49:58.559 --> 00:50:00.519
<v Speaker 1>so it's not that necessarily. Yeah, yeah, one and one

966
00:50:00.559 --> 00:50:01.519
<v Speaker 1>and two are really good.

967
00:50:01.960 --> 00:50:04.760
<v Speaker 12>What what all do you cover in your big red book,

968
00:50:05.119 --> 00:50:06.400
<v Speaker 12>like the theology book.

969
00:50:06.679 --> 00:50:07.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just kind of a.

970
00:50:07.360 --> 00:50:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Random collection of apologetic essays over ten years. So there's

971
00:50:11.480 --> 00:50:15.599
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Roman Catholic critiques, papal critiques, created great critiques,

972
00:50:15.719 --> 00:50:19.639
<v Speaker 2>arguments for essence, energy, philio quick critiques, and then it

973
00:50:19.719 --> 00:50:22.559
<v Speaker 2>gets into more, you know, kind of all over the place,

974
00:50:22.599 --> 00:50:25.320
<v Speaker 2>philosophical essays and critiques of the New World Order. So

975
00:50:25.440 --> 00:50:28.440
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of a broad spectrum. Yeah, it's like seven

976
00:50:28.519 --> 00:50:30.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred pages, right, Yeah, it's it's all that.

977
00:50:31.039 --> 00:50:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's basically ten years of blog post in one book.

978
00:50:34.320 --> 00:50:36.480
<v Speaker 12>All right, I appreciate Jay. I also want to say,

979
00:50:36.719 --> 00:50:39.880
<v Speaker 12>I really appreciate your content. Man, it's uh help. It's

980
00:50:39.920 --> 00:50:42.079
<v Speaker 12>helped me in convert to Orthodoxy. Like I said, I'm

981
00:50:42.079 --> 00:50:42.760
<v Speaker 12>a catech human.

982
00:50:43.159 --> 00:50:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Well that's greatat appreciate that, man, appreciate you great question.

983
00:50:48.599 --> 00:50:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

984
00:50:48.800 --> 00:50:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Those are always great places to start, you know, if

985
00:50:51.000 --> 00:50:52.679
<v Speaker 2>you want to start in the Church Fathers, I always say,

986
00:50:52.719 --> 00:50:56.280
<v Speaker 2>read on the Incarnation by Athenatious, you know, read on

987
00:50:56.360 --> 00:50:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the Holy Spirit by Basil, read uh five theological rations

988
00:51:00.000 --> 00:51:04.159
<v Speaker 2>record outs as great place to start to get the

989
00:51:04.280 --> 00:51:04.760
<v Speaker 2>idea what the.

990
00:51:04.760 --> 00:51:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Patricial teaching is.

991
00:51:05.639 --> 00:51:07.679
<v Speaker 2>And also, of course the post opseell for others as well,

992
00:51:07.760 --> 00:51:11.960
<v Speaker 2>ignacious and clements in Aeronaeus, it's open for them. I

993
00:51:12.079 --> 00:51:18.480
<v Speaker 2>have the renowned and esteemed father, doctor Deacon Anonius, the

994
00:51:19.599 --> 00:51:22.840
<v Speaker 2>creator of the Ortho Braro political movement that is seeking

995
00:51:22.960 --> 00:51:28.159
<v Speaker 2>to create a earthly kingdom, much like Ann Lee did

996
00:51:28.239 --> 00:51:30.679
<v Speaker 2>amongst the Quakers Thomas or something.

997
00:51:30.960 --> 00:51:36.159
<v Speaker 20>Hey, so I come from a Protestant background. I'm curious

998
00:51:36.639 --> 00:51:41.320
<v Speaker 20>since Prosimism has a big emphasis on proselytizing, I'm curious

999
00:51:41.440 --> 00:51:49.599
<v Speaker 20>what the Orthodox viewpoint on proselytizing is, maybe in compared

1000
00:51:49.639 --> 00:51:51.320
<v Speaker 20>to prosimism or just.

1001
00:51:51.519 --> 00:51:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, we we have been here making thousands

1002
00:51:56.000 --> 00:51:58.440
<v Speaker 2>of converts for the last eight years on the Orthodox

1003
00:51:58.719 --> 00:52:01.960
<v Speaker 2>to Orthodoxy on the online, so we definitely believe in

1004
00:52:02.039 --> 00:52:05.559
<v Speaker 2>proselytizing just means making converts. Prosepolytes is a convert in

1005
00:52:05.639 --> 00:52:10.039
<v Speaker 2>the New Testament. So but we probably have different ideas

1006
00:52:10.119 --> 00:52:13.039
<v Speaker 2>obviously from what evangelicals think. That is, for the Orthodox,

1007
00:52:13.199 --> 00:52:16.599
<v Speaker 2>it means you become an inquirer, you become a cateicuman

1008
00:52:16.719 --> 00:52:19.039
<v Speaker 2>that takes you know, one to three years. Then you

1009
00:52:19.199 --> 00:52:22.679
<v Speaker 2>join the church for evangelicals, it's like you go and

1010
00:52:22.800 --> 00:52:25.480
<v Speaker 2>pray at a service and raise your hands and cry.

1011
00:52:25.320 --> 00:52:27.239
<v Speaker 1>And Jesus becomes your boyfriends. So we have we have

1012
00:52:27.360 --> 00:52:30.760
<v Speaker 1>very different ideas. Okay, all right, thank you, that's all

1013
00:52:30.800 --> 00:52:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to know. No, that's actually a good question.

1014
00:52:32.960 --> 00:52:35.519
<v Speaker 13>Josh, hey man, thanks for having me as always, dude.

1015
00:52:35.519 --> 00:52:38.079
<v Speaker 13>I saw that recent debate with Temple that was hilarious.

1016
00:52:38.920 --> 00:52:42.519
<v Speaker 13>But I got a question for you. Quite welcome. So

1017
00:52:42.760 --> 00:52:44.880
<v Speaker 13>me and my kids were reading Chronicles of Narnia and

1018
00:52:44.920 --> 00:52:47.199
<v Speaker 13>I ended up watching a C. S. Lewis documentary which

1019
00:52:47.239 --> 00:52:50.239
<v Speaker 13>is pretty interesting, but there was an aside in there.

1020
00:52:50.320 --> 00:52:52.280
<v Speaker 13>I was curious if you had insight on this. Give

1021
00:52:52.519 --> 00:52:54.639
<v Speaker 13>we lost it, Josh, I want to come back, try again.

1022
00:52:54.800 --> 00:52:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead. C. S Lewis, go ahead. Anyway.

1023
00:52:58.360 --> 00:53:01.199
<v Speaker 13>Supposedly, there was a debate he had towards the end

1024
00:53:01.239 --> 00:53:03.519
<v Speaker 13>of his career and apologetics and maybe the end of

1025
00:53:03.559 --> 00:53:09.119
<v Speaker 13>his life where he couldn't refute the materialist question or

1026
00:53:09.559 --> 00:53:15.000
<v Speaker 13>their argument that if truth can't be explained by materialism alone,

1027
00:53:15.400 --> 00:53:18.880
<v Speaker 13>how could await scale you know, be accurate that type

1028
00:53:18.880 --> 00:53:21.320
<v Speaker 13>of an argument. I'm just curious what you do about

1029
00:53:21.320 --> 00:53:24.800
<v Speaker 13>that debate, about that line of the argumentation, and you

1030
00:53:24.840 --> 00:53:25.920
<v Speaker 13>know how you would refute.

1031
00:53:26.519 --> 00:53:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard this, but we might ask father Deacon.

1032
00:53:29.519 --> 00:53:33.800
<v Speaker 2>He's got really good arguments against the logical arguments against materialism,

1033
00:53:33.880 --> 00:53:35.440
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not familiar with this since yes, so this

1034
00:53:35.480 --> 00:53:37.280
<v Speaker 2>is his wife, father Dion, are you there?

1035
00:53:37.480 --> 00:53:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you want to know the the logical problems.

1036
00:53:41.920 --> 00:53:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you would be good at this. Yeah.

1037
00:53:43.559 --> 00:53:50.159
<v Speaker 6>So this comes out of philosophy of mind and what's

1038
00:53:50.239 --> 00:53:54.159
<v Speaker 6>known as the irreducible consciousness arguments. So in philosophy of

1039
00:53:54.239 --> 00:53:55.320
<v Speaker 6>mind you had, like.

1040
00:53:55.440 --> 00:53:56.840
<v Speaker 5>You have competing schools.

1041
00:53:56.960 --> 00:54:01.039
<v Speaker 6>Obviously you have substance dualists and primary The substance duelists

1042
00:54:01.079 --> 00:54:03.360
<v Speaker 6>and materialists both.

1043
00:54:03.199 --> 00:54:05.639
<v Speaker 5>Are like the opposite spectrums.

1044
00:54:06.159 --> 00:54:11.639
<v Speaker 6>Philosophically, and there's a whole variety of theories under materialism.

1045
00:54:12.519 --> 00:54:17.719
<v Speaker 6>And so philosophers and philosopher and philosophy of mind came

1046
00:54:17.840 --> 00:54:24.360
<v Speaker 6>up with a series of kind of modal arguments in

1047
00:54:24.519 --> 00:54:32.360
<v Speaker 6>which like possible worlds or conceivability arguments that refute materialism,

1048
00:54:32.440 --> 00:54:37.079
<v Speaker 6>and which because the materialist thesis is not simply it

1049
00:54:37.280 --> 00:54:41.880
<v Speaker 6>just happens to be just true in this world that

1050
00:54:42.039 --> 00:54:45.639
<v Speaker 6>everything's physical and empirical, and that there are no immaterial

1051
00:54:46.280 --> 00:54:47.760
<v Speaker 6>properties or entities.

1052
00:54:48.119 --> 00:54:50.800
<v Speaker 5>But it has a modal strength in every possible world.

1053
00:54:50.880 --> 00:54:54.599
<v Speaker 6>So the way that you, for somebody is saying it's impossible,

1054
00:54:54.679 --> 00:54:59.559
<v Speaker 6>it's logically impossible that there are any immaterial entities or properties.

1055
00:55:00.320 --> 00:55:02.719
<v Speaker 6>All you have to do is think of a a

1056
00:55:03.280 --> 00:55:11.119
<v Speaker 6>conceivability argument. Well, I'm conceiving of, for example, zombies, and

1057
00:55:11.280 --> 00:55:14.360
<v Speaker 6>which are physically identical to us in every way, but

1058
00:55:14.559 --> 00:55:22.719
<v Speaker 6>they lack consciousness. There's other arguments too, like Frank Jackson's

1059
00:55:22.760 --> 00:55:27.880
<v Speaker 6>what Mary Didn't Know? That all served to basically refute materialism.

1060
00:55:28.800 --> 00:55:31.719
<v Speaker 6>I can think of a world in which your thesis

1061
00:55:31.800 --> 00:55:35.119
<v Speaker 6>isn't true and therefore materialism is false.

1062
00:55:35.440 --> 00:55:37.519
<v Speaker 5>That's basically the gist of it. I mean it's more

1063
00:55:37.559 --> 00:55:40.199
<v Speaker 5>complicated that, but that's the general kind of structure of

1064
00:55:40.280 --> 00:55:40.840
<v Speaker 5>those arguments.

1065
00:55:41.199 --> 00:55:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Can you explain why a conceivability argument would work in

1066
00:55:44.800 --> 00:55:46.320
<v Speaker 2>this case? Because I think most people are going to

1067
00:55:46.320 --> 00:55:49.000
<v Speaker 2>immediately think, well, just because you can, Okay.

1068
00:55:48.840 --> 00:55:52.760
<v Speaker 6>So let me just do the logical possibility of zombies.

1069
00:55:54.639 --> 00:55:57.480
<v Speaker 6>If materialism is true, then the things that we think of,

1070
00:55:57.719 --> 00:56:06.679
<v Speaker 6>like consciousness mental states can be epistemologically and ontologically.

1071
00:56:06.079 --> 00:56:11.039
<v Speaker 5>Reduced to simply material states, whether that's functionalism or identity

1072
00:56:11.119 --> 00:56:12.519
<v Speaker 5>theories and things like that.

1073
00:56:13.000 --> 00:56:17.360
<v Speaker 6>So the fact that I can think about that structurally

1074
00:56:17.760 --> 00:56:23.239
<v Speaker 6>something identical to me but lacks consciousness means that they're

1075
00:56:23.320 --> 00:56:27.079
<v Speaker 6>leaving something out, and therefore it can't be reduced. Now

1076
00:56:27.119 --> 00:56:29.199
<v Speaker 6>though of course say, well, that just wouldn't happen, you

1077
00:56:29.239 --> 00:56:33.320
<v Speaker 6>would get consciousness. The problem is I'm not speaking about

1078
00:56:33.440 --> 00:56:36.480
<v Speaker 6>whether it happened in this world. I didn't contradict myself

1079
00:56:36.559 --> 00:56:42.519
<v Speaker 6>in thinking that. Therefore it's not logically true that materialism

1080
00:56:43.199 --> 00:56:46.760
<v Speaker 6>because I've thought a counter example in a possible world.

1081
00:56:47.800 --> 00:56:50.079
<v Speaker 6>The other one is what Mary doesn't know. And she's

1082
00:56:50.320 --> 00:56:52.639
<v Speaker 6>like a brilliant scientist, and she's a genius.

1083
00:56:52.679 --> 00:56:57.199
<v Speaker 5>She's brought up in a black and white room and she's.

1084
00:56:57.320 --> 00:56:59.920
<v Speaker 6>Specialized in optics and color vision and stuff like that,

1085
00:57:00.199 --> 00:57:02.840
<v Speaker 6>so she knows what it is to be read, and

1086
00:57:03.320 --> 00:57:04.840
<v Speaker 6>so she shouldn't learn any.

1087
00:57:04.679 --> 00:57:05.920
<v Speaker 5>New facts of she.

1088
00:57:06.159 --> 00:57:09.599
<v Speaker 6>Let's suppose she learns everything about what red is, and

1089
00:57:09.760 --> 00:57:12.119
<v Speaker 6>then she's released from the room, the black and white

1090
00:57:12.199 --> 00:57:16.119
<v Speaker 6>room that she grew up in, and she experiences a

1091
00:57:16.239 --> 00:57:20.199
<v Speaker 6>red rose, and she gains a new fact, namely what

1092
00:57:20.360 --> 00:57:27.039
<v Speaker 6>it's like to experience a quality, a qualitative experience of red. Okay,

1093
00:57:27.679 --> 00:57:31.519
<v Speaker 6>if physical is a materialism is true, she shouldn't learn

1094
00:57:31.559 --> 00:57:34.960
<v Speaker 6>anything new because she learned all third person objective facts.

1095
00:57:35.480 --> 00:57:40.400
<v Speaker 6>Then the response the response would be, well, she wouldn't

1096
00:57:40.440 --> 00:57:44.840
<v Speaker 6>learn anything, But that's not the problem. The problem is, Yeah,

1097
00:57:44.880 --> 00:57:48.599
<v Speaker 6>but I thought about a scenario and a logically possible

1098
00:57:48.679 --> 00:57:51.119
<v Speaker 6>world where she would and I didn't contradict myself. And

1099
00:57:51.199 --> 00:57:55.840
<v Speaker 6>if materialism says the materialism is true in every logically

1100
00:57:55.920 --> 00:57:58.280
<v Speaker 6>possible world, all I have to do is think about

1101
00:57:58.280 --> 00:58:00.800
<v Speaker 6>a possible world in which it's not the case. So

1102
00:58:00.880 --> 00:58:03.360
<v Speaker 6>they all have that kind of structure. They are complicated.

1103
00:58:03.440 --> 00:58:06.480
<v Speaker 6>Modal arguments and logical possibility arguments are really complicated, but

1104
00:58:06.519 --> 00:58:07.119
<v Speaker 6>they're really good.

1105
00:58:07.320 --> 00:58:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's great.

1106
00:58:08.440 --> 00:58:10.199
<v Speaker 2>By the way, did you see, by chance in the

1107
00:58:10.280 --> 00:58:12.800
<v Speaker 2>last few days when we did the review of Nick's

1108
00:58:12.840 --> 00:58:15.480
<v Speaker 2>debate with Jake Muscle Metaphysician.

1109
00:58:15.000 --> 00:58:15.519
<v Speaker 1>On the Trinity.

1110
00:58:15.840 --> 00:58:18.280
<v Speaker 2>No, I didn't, So you would have liked them, because

1111
00:58:18.480 --> 00:58:20.880
<v Speaker 2>basically what happened was I thank you for your question.

1112
00:58:21.000 --> 00:58:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Josh Nick presented out of analytical philosophy just relative identity

1113
00:58:30.039 --> 00:58:34.360
<v Speaker 2>as a way to logically show that something can be

1114
00:58:36.280 --> 00:58:40.679
<v Speaker 2>one and also not one in different ways based on

1115
00:58:40.760 --> 00:58:44.760
<v Speaker 2>different types of classification. So there's like there's pure relative

1116
00:58:44.800 --> 00:58:48.639
<v Speaker 2>identity in logic, and then there's impure relative identity. So

1117
00:58:48.760 --> 00:58:52.119
<v Speaker 2>Nick was just arguing and impure relative identity. And the

1118
00:58:52.199 --> 00:58:55.920
<v Speaker 2>problem is that Jake didn't realize that. He strength that

1119
00:58:56.039 --> 00:58:59.360
<v Speaker 2>the premise of the debate was is the Trinity illogical?

1120
00:58:59.519 --> 00:58:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Right?

1121
00:59:00.360 --> 00:59:04.920
<v Speaker 2>All Nick had to do is show that through relative

1122
00:59:05.000 --> 00:59:10.719
<v Speaker 2>identity logic, the statements.

1123
00:59:10.199 --> 00:59:11.559
<v Speaker 1>About the Trinity being.

1124
00:59:13.760 --> 00:59:15.559
<v Speaker 2>You know, one God in three persons are not a

1125
00:59:15.639 --> 00:59:20.119
<v Speaker 2>contradiction because Jake said they're a contradiction. So when Jake

1126
00:59:20.199 --> 00:59:23.440
<v Speaker 2>admits that in the way that it's formulated, it's not

1127
00:59:23.519 --> 00:59:26.559
<v Speaker 2>a contradiction that date was over, but you would like

1128
00:59:26.639 --> 00:59:28.719
<v Speaker 2>it because it's similar to what you're arguing.

1129
00:59:29.559 --> 00:59:31.360
<v Speaker 1>When what Jake said was, yeah, but.

1130
00:59:31.440 --> 00:59:35.320
<v Speaker 2>The Trinity has all this metaphysics, and the point was that, yeah,

1131
00:59:35.360 --> 00:59:37.159
<v Speaker 2>but I don't have to get into the metaphysics, because

1132
00:59:37.199 --> 00:59:39.480
<v Speaker 2>all I have to do is say that something can

1133
00:59:39.559 --> 00:59:42.159
<v Speaker 2>be three m be one and it's not a logical contradiction.

1134
00:59:42.840 --> 00:59:49.079
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, because if somebody's position is it's a contradiction that

1135
00:59:49.239 --> 00:59:53.280
<v Speaker 6>it holds across every possible Yes, So there's a necessity.

1136
00:59:53.519 --> 00:59:55.880
<v Speaker 2>But you don't have to get into the metaphysics which

1137
00:59:56.559 --> 00:59:57.679
<v Speaker 2>give the metaphysics.

1138
00:59:57.760 --> 01:00:01.760
<v Speaker 6>That's that's why people misunder stand You're absolutely right. The

1139
01:00:02.360 --> 01:00:05.119
<v Speaker 6>irreduced by the consciousness arguments that were like, well that

1140
01:00:05.159 --> 01:00:08.639
<v Speaker 6>wouldn't happen, and it's like, well, that's the metaphysics. I

1141
01:00:08.679 --> 01:00:10.599
<v Speaker 6>don't have to actually get into the metaphysics of the

1142
01:00:10.719 --> 01:00:15.280
<v Speaker 6>universe to actually logically conceive of a situation that negates

1143
01:00:15.360 --> 01:00:15.920
<v Speaker 6>your position.

1144
01:00:16.320 --> 01:00:17.800
<v Speaker 5>That's not a logical contradiction.

1145
01:00:17.920 --> 01:00:20.920
<v Speaker 6>If if that's possible, you're saying it's in how do

1146
01:00:20.960 --> 01:00:24.840
<v Speaker 6>you refute somebody says it's impossible, Well, you either physically

1147
01:00:24.920 --> 01:00:29.480
<v Speaker 6>show it empirically, or you say it's logically possible. I

1148
01:00:29.599 --> 01:00:33.559
<v Speaker 6>conceived of it without contradicting myself, and so that that's

1149
01:00:33.639 --> 01:00:37.079
<v Speaker 6>what's happening in that debate too. Yeah, I definitely think

1150
01:00:37.320 --> 01:00:40.840
<v Speaker 6>argument with the Odyssey too, with the problem of evil.

1151
01:00:41.039 --> 01:00:44.679
<v Speaker 6>If somebody says it's impossible that an omniscient, on benevolent,

1152
01:00:45.920 --> 01:00:48.920
<v Speaker 6>omnipotent God exists and evil exists, all I have to

1153
01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:50.880
<v Speaker 6>do is create. I don't have to get into the

1154
01:00:50.920 --> 01:00:54.119
<v Speaker 6>metaphysics of the universe. All I have to do is

1155
01:00:54.639 --> 01:00:58.360
<v Speaker 6>it's not impossible, it's possible, and then it throws the

1156
01:00:58.400 --> 01:01:01.400
<v Speaker 6>burden to proof on them, to show how that I'm conceiving,

1157
01:01:01.840 --> 01:01:04.800
<v Speaker 6>for example, as Saint Augustine, And then Chitteran points out,

1158
01:01:05.159 --> 01:01:07.320
<v Speaker 6>isn't it logically POSSI didn't say it this way, but

1159
01:01:07.360 --> 01:01:10.159
<v Speaker 6>it's basically what's going on in the argument, isn't it

1160
01:01:10.280 --> 01:01:14.039
<v Speaker 6>logically possible? An omniscient, omni benevolent, omnipotent God could bring

1161
01:01:14.800 --> 01:01:17.159
<v Speaker 6>allow evil if he brings out a greater good by

1162
01:01:17.239 --> 01:01:20.760
<v Speaker 6>allowing it than if you prevent it. Yes, then your

1163
01:01:20.880 --> 01:01:23.800
<v Speaker 6>positions refuted because I just you said it's impossible. I

1164
01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:26.840
<v Speaker 6>just showed that there's no logical contradiction, and I don't

1165
01:01:26.920 --> 01:01:29.599
<v Speaker 6>have to answer why God does it? A lot to

1166
01:01:29.639 --> 01:01:32.400
<v Speaker 6>show is isn't it logically possible? So your argument that

1167
01:01:32.480 --> 01:01:34.719
<v Speaker 6>it's logically impossible is refuted.

1168
01:01:34.559 --> 01:01:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, And that's what the whole debate ended I being about,

1169
01:01:37.119 --> 01:01:39.800
<v Speaker 2>because once Jake conceded that with like within like thirty

1170
01:01:39.880 --> 01:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>minutes of the debate, the debate was over. And then

1171
01:01:41.760 --> 01:01:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Jake shifted into try to argue the energies and all

1172
01:01:43.920 --> 01:01:47.039
<v Speaker 2>this metaphysics. So it's like, yeah, but the debate, Jake,

1173
01:01:47.079 --> 01:01:48.559
<v Speaker 2>if that was the case, you should have made the

1174
01:01:48.599 --> 01:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>premise is the Trinity true? But he didn't accept the

1175
01:01:51.920 --> 01:01:55.079
<v Speaker 2>premise as the Trinity true? He said, is the Trinity logical?

1176
01:01:55.320 --> 01:01:57.199
<v Speaker 2>And that's where he made a fatal flaw. Just how

1177
01:01:57.280 --> 01:02:01.039
<v Speaker 2>you got on you, hey, Jake? Another question, all of

1178
01:02:01.119 --> 01:02:03.639
<v Speaker 2>the questions that are going, can you hear me?

1179
01:02:03.880 --> 01:02:04.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Go ahead.

1180
01:02:06.079 --> 01:02:10.159
<v Speaker 9>So another question she had that I couldn't totally answer

1181
01:02:10.519 --> 01:02:13.039
<v Speaker 9>very simply is she was like, why do why do

1182
01:02:13.239 --> 01:02:16.920
<v Speaker 9>we need to go through a class to you know,

1183
01:02:17.199 --> 01:02:20.800
<v Speaker 9>enter into the Orthodox Church? Another you know, her her

1184
01:02:21.159 --> 01:02:24.400
<v Speaker 9>whole mind frame is coming from a Protestant perspective.

1185
01:02:24.480 --> 01:02:24.679
<v Speaker 7>You know.

1186
01:02:27.599 --> 01:02:30.000
<v Speaker 9>What would be a simple answer to give.

1187
01:02:30.119 --> 01:02:32.719
<v Speaker 2>I guess, well, because the Church has a lot of

1188
01:02:32.800 --> 01:02:37.519
<v Speaker 2>teachings that are from divine revelation. Divine revelation is you know,

1189
01:02:37.719 --> 01:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>partly contained in the scriptures. But you know, the scriptures

1190
01:02:40.280 --> 01:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>aren't organized as a book of catechisis.

1191
01:02:43.400 --> 01:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>The Bible is a liturgical book.

1192
01:02:45.519 --> 01:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it's difficult to just catechize someone or

1193
01:02:48.880 --> 01:02:52.639
<v Speaker 2>teach them that theology from merely reading the scriptures.

1194
01:02:52.679 --> 01:02:53.599
<v Speaker 1>It's not impossible.

1195
01:02:53.679 --> 01:02:56.679
<v Speaker 2>But that's why the Church has typically had a period

1196
01:02:56.760 --> 01:02:59.639
<v Speaker 2>of time where you learn the theology of the Church

1197
01:02:59.719 --> 01:03:03.000
<v Speaker 2>from the Creed, which expresses, you know, the essence of

1198
01:03:03.119 --> 01:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the Christian beliefs. And then every catechism usually expounds upon

1199
01:03:07.920 --> 01:03:10.239
<v Speaker 2>the nice, you know, constant Apolitan Creed because that's the

1200
01:03:10.280 --> 01:03:14.079
<v Speaker 2>basics of our system. So because the Church has dogmas,

1201
01:03:14.159 --> 01:03:16.679
<v Speaker 2>because the Church has a you know, two thousand year history,

1202
01:03:17.760 --> 01:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not like Protestantism where you're just sort of window

1203
01:03:20.480 --> 01:03:23.199
<v Speaker 2>shopping and you pick an outfit or you pick a

1204
01:03:23.480 --> 01:03:26.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, a shirt or a hat, like you have

1205
01:03:26.599 --> 01:03:30.519
<v Speaker 2>to learn the totality of the system. Also, it's for

1206
01:03:30.679 --> 01:03:33.639
<v Speaker 2>your own good because you know, you want to make

1207
01:03:33.679 --> 01:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>sure you're making it, because we take it very seriously.

1208
01:03:36.400 --> 01:03:38.039
<v Speaker 2>You want to make sure you're making the right decision.

1209
01:03:38.320 --> 01:03:42.199
<v Speaker 2>So it's not like you know, willy nilly type, come

1210
01:03:42.280 --> 01:03:44.400
<v Speaker 2>down to the altar and pray and then you're in

1211
01:03:44.519 --> 01:03:48.079
<v Speaker 2>the church. Like, this is a very serious commitment. It's

1212
01:03:48.280 --> 01:03:51.000
<v Speaker 2>way more serious than what you find in evangelicalism. So

1213
01:03:51.519 --> 01:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>you want to know that you learn these things and

1214
01:03:55.119 --> 01:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>agree with these things before you sign on to something

1215
01:03:57.400 --> 01:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>that you know six months down the road. And this

1216
01:04:00.559 --> 01:04:03.639
<v Speaker 2>is because the Church has the long history of dealing

1217
01:04:03.760 --> 01:04:07.039
<v Speaker 2>with and understanding you know, a lot of people think, oh, yeah,

1218
01:04:07.079 --> 01:04:09.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm really into this is really neat, it's really pretty,

1219
01:04:09.079 --> 01:04:10.800
<v Speaker 2>and then six months later they're like, I don't know

1220
01:04:10.800 --> 01:04:11.480
<v Speaker 2>if I agree with this.

1221
01:04:11.800 --> 01:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't like this idea.

1222
01:04:13.519 --> 01:04:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Well then maybe it's you know, maybe it's not the

1223
01:04:16.079 --> 01:04:18.960
<v Speaker 2>right thing for you because you're not in a position

1224
01:04:19.119 --> 01:04:21.960
<v Speaker 2>yet where you have the humility to submit to the

1225
01:04:22.039 --> 01:04:25.079
<v Speaker 2>teaching of the church. So there's a lot of different

1226
01:04:25.119 --> 01:04:28.719
<v Speaker 2>reasons why it's not an overnight thing. Although there could

1227
01:04:28.760 --> 01:04:31.599
<v Speaker 2>be situations out of the norm or that happens for

1228
01:04:31.760 --> 01:04:34.519
<v Speaker 2>most people, it's the wisdom.

1229
01:04:34.239 --> 01:04:36.559
<v Speaker 1>Of the church as the side of that, it's it's

1230
01:04:36.679 --> 01:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>better for people to take their time to go ahead.

1231
01:04:40.519 --> 01:04:45.599
<v Speaker 6>I've had inquiries. It's a general problem that maybe we

1232
01:04:45.679 --> 01:04:48.960
<v Speaker 6>all have about oh this is so hard for me,

1233
01:04:49.559 --> 01:04:55.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, I'm you know, complaining about different struggles, et cetera.

1234
01:04:56.480 --> 01:04:59.840
<v Speaker 6>And I've told people, well, maybe you shouldn't become Orthodox

1235
01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:03.079
<v Speaker 6>cause tho struggles will get worse and Orthodoxy is not

1236
01:05:03.239 --> 01:05:11.039
<v Speaker 6>here to give you comfort, sensual and finite comforts, like

1237
01:05:11.440 --> 01:05:14.960
<v Speaker 6>it's here to give you a cross, because it's only

1238
01:05:15.039 --> 01:05:18.119
<v Speaker 6>through the cross that we acquire virtues and the resurrection.

1239
01:05:18.480 --> 01:05:20.159
<v Speaker 5>So I kind of am upfront with people.

1240
01:05:20.199 --> 01:05:22.679
<v Speaker 6>I'm like, I don't know what you think you're getting into,

1241
01:05:22.920 --> 01:05:27.599
<v Speaker 6>but like the struggles increase and it gets worse. And

1242
01:05:27.719 --> 01:05:33.000
<v Speaker 6>the whole project and prescription of Orthodoxy is to deny yourself.

1243
01:05:33.079 --> 01:05:38.199
<v Speaker 5>So if you're in it for like I want what

1244
01:05:38.400 --> 01:05:40.239
<v Speaker 5>I want and you know I don't.

1245
01:05:40.400 --> 01:05:44.079
<v Speaker 6>My life's miserable and blah blah blah, Like Orthodoxy is

1246
01:05:44.119 --> 01:05:46.400
<v Speaker 6>not going to make your life pleasurable.

1247
01:05:46.920 --> 01:05:48.159
<v Speaker 5>It's gonna be really difficult.

1248
01:05:48.840 --> 01:05:51.679
<v Speaker 6>And so I'm just upfront with people and yeah, it's

1249
01:05:51.719 --> 01:05:55.719
<v Speaker 6>a different you know, it's going to require humility, and

1250
01:05:56.119 --> 01:05:59.159
<v Speaker 6>it's not a system of It's not a system at all.

1251
01:05:59.239 --> 01:06:01.440
<v Speaker 6>It's like, well, here's the correct doctrine. It's a way

1252
01:06:01.480 --> 01:06:03.840
<v Speaker 6>of life, and it's a cross and.

1253
01:06:05.039 --> 01:06:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Not Joel Ovaltine's self help prosperity Gospel.

1254
01:06:08.960 --> 01:06:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, go ahead, Anthony, Am I coming through. Okay?

1255
01:06:12.280 --> 01:06:12.440
<v Speaker 11>Yes?

1256
01:06:12.880 --> 01:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Nice? Uh, it's really quick.

1257
01:06:14.400 --> 01:06:17.639
<v Speaker 21>Two questions for Jay and one for other than nice.

1258
01:06:17.920 --> 01:06:20.760
<v Speaker 21>What is in your opinion, Jade? Is there any reason why,

1259
01:06:20.960 --> 01:06:25.119
<v Speaker 21>Like the more I talk to other Christians outside of

1260
01:06:25.159 --> 01:06:29.280
<v Speaker 21>the church, I noticed that like Unitarianism is prevalent in

1261
01:06:29.360 --> 01:06:32.159
<v Speaker 21>the United States, at least in my circles. Is there

1262
01:06:32.199 --> 01:06:34.400
<v Speaker 21>any reason for that since it's not it's not really

1263
01:06:34.440 --> 01:06:36.480
<v Speaker 21>that present outside of the States.

1264
01:06:37.679 --> 01:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I think there's been a lot of heterodox movements that

1265
01:06:41.079 --> 01:06:43.519
<v Speaker 2>have been funded that push this. For example, all the

1266
01:06:43.639 --> 01:06:48.079
<v Speaker 2>Daily Wire funding. Just as an example is from these

1267
01:06:48.400 --> 01:06:52.119
<v Speaker 2>Texas billionaires who go to a Unitarian church. It's like

1268
01:06:52.199 --> 01:06:56.719
<v Speaker 2>a weird Unitarian Zionist thing, and so they push that

1269
01:06:57.039 --> 01:07:00.360
<v Speaker 2>through a lot of their outlets. You know, I just

1270
01:07:00.840 --> 01:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>went on Jesse Lee Peterson thing the other day, and

1271
01:07:03.880 --> 01:07:06.559
<v Speaker 2>he has his own homemade church where he teaches Unitarianism.

1272
01:07:07.559 --> 01:07:10.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, a few years ago we were debating this

1273
01:07:10.639 --> 01:07:14.920
<v Speaker 2>new new Apostolic movement or something that's all Unitarian. It

1274
01:07:15.039 --> 01:07:19.119
<v Speaker 2>was me and doctor Boumranson versus some creature from this sect.

1275
01:07:19.880 --> 01:07:22.599
<v Speaker 2>So I think there is some kind of push and movement.

1276
01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:26.559
<v Speaker 2>I don't know all the inner workings, but probably is

1277
01:07:26.639 --> 01:07:30.239
<v Speaker 2>some funding for this kind of stuff to be, you know,

1278
01:07:30.400 --> 01:07:35.199
<v Speaker 2>to push sectarian ideas from different from different systems, different outlets.

1279
01:07:35.320 --> 01:07:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Probably some Israeli outlets do so they've always tended to

1280
01:07:39.760 --> 01:07:43.039
<v Speaker 2>have a hand in a Unitarian and Arean types of movements,

1281
01:07:43.400 --> 01:07:48.599
<v Speaker 2>So that would be my guess. But also I think

1282
01:07:48.719 --> 01:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>that as people's IQ declines, and I know that it's

1283
01:07:51.480 --> 01:07:53.199
<v Speaker 2>a spiritual problem, not trying to make it toally IQ,

1284
01:07:53.480 --> 01:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>but also it is the case that as people get

1285
01:07:56.199 --> 01:08:00.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of dumber, they have a really hard time in

1286
01:08:00.400 --> 01:08:03.159
<v Speaker 2>thinking of things in an abstract way or thinking of

1287
01:08:03.280 --> 01:08:06.400
<v Speaker 2>things that that aren't either simple either ors well to

1288
01:08:06.519 --> 01:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>god what three right? If you saw my debate with

1289
01:08:09.840 --> 01:08:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Captain Tazarijak, he could not just like many of Muslims,

1290
01:08:13.760 --> 01:08:15.639
<v Speaker 2>he could not conceive of something being both and it

1291
01:08:16.520 --> 01:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>had to be either or. So I think that there's

1292
01:08:19.840 --> 01:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of just low tier, just stupid people combined

1293
01:08:23.640 --> 01:08:28.439
<v Speaker 2>with subversive money for subversive sectarian.

1294
01:08:27.920 --> 01:08:31.119
<v Speaker 6>Ideology, and also the Internet, right, I mean, you had

1295
01:08:31.399 --> 01:08:34.319
<v Speaker 6>Owen Benjamin comes up with his and.

1296
01:08:34.399 --> 01:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a lot of made up Internet people, don't.

1297
01:08:37.720 --> 01:08:43.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and then they have a following and presence online

1298
01:08:43.760 --> 01:08:47.119
<v Speaker 6>and more of that, you know, informations to seminate among

1299
01:08:47.279 --> 01:08:51.960
<v Speaker 6>public and people were dumb and not educated, and so

1300
01:08:52.119 --> 01:08:55.399
<v Speaker 6>they fall for for those things, not to mention that

1301
01:08:55.439 --> 01:08:58.840
<v Speaker 6>they're fanboys of different people. And so I think you

1302
01:08:58.880 --> 01:09:00.800
<v Speaker 6>get to just piercing and you get it with Owen

1303
01:09:00.880 --> 01:09:04.119
<v Speaker 6>Benjamin because it's the same thing with.

1304
01:09:04.600 --> 01:09:06.880
<v Speaker 5>The Black Heber Israelites.

1305
01:09:09.720 --> 01:09:11.520
<v Speaker 6>What's the other groups just the same as the Black

1306
01:09:11.600 --> 01:09:17.199
<v Speaker 6>HEBW Hebrew is Lights, uh, the Judaising groups, Hebrew Roots.

1307
01:09:17.279 --> 01:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thank you.

1308
01:09:19.119 --> 01:09:23.600
<v Speaker 6>I think all of that in part comes from you know,

1309
01:09:23.680 --> 01:09:26.560
<v Speaker 6>these people pushing and adopting these things online. It just

1310
01:09:26.600 --> 01:09:30.079
<v Speaker 6>gets spread, same with the paganism, so that the Rabbi Green,

1311
01:09:30.159 --> 01:09:30.960
<v Speaker 6>Adam Green.

1312
01:09:31.479 --> 01:09:36.079
<v Speaker 21>Exact, Yeah, gotcha much better than my guess is I

1313
01:09:36.239 --> 01:09:42.319
<v Speaker 21>appreciate that I'm proselytizing to uh Arian Hebrew roots friends.

1314
01:09:42.319 --> 01:09:45.479
<v Speaker 21>Speaking of that, and in the you guys are much

1315
01:09:45.520 --> 01:09:47.760
<v Speaker 21>more well read mentioned.

1316
01:09:49.680 --> 01:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Gray is the Aryans?

1317
01:09:51.920 --> 01:09:55.920
<v Speaker 21>Oh yeah, yeah, man, I'm so happy you talk with

1318
01:09:56.000 --> 01:09:59.159
<v Speaker 21>these guys. It's so cathartic, man, It's it's amazing. Is

1319
01:09:59.199 --> 01:10:02.520
<v Speaker 21>there any mentioned by that Postolic fathers or even the

1320
01:10:02.600 --> 01:10:05.600
<v Speaker 21>early Church? I mean they're less they're less prone to

1321
01:10:05.640 --> 01:10:09.800
<v Speaker 21>accept Early Church fathers. But do the Apostolic fathers mention

1322
01:10:10.119 --> 01:10:14.920
<v Speaker 21>any concepts of like the Jewish Binetarianism that you guys

1323
01:10:14.920 --> 01:10:15.960
<v Speaker 21>are aware of, or like the.

1324
01:10:16.600 --> 01:10:17.479
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good question.

1325
01:10:17.720 --> 01:10:21.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't know of a Church father that mentions Jewishitarianism,

1326
01:10:21.520 --> 01:10:25.520
<v Speaker 2>although some people might argue that that influenced justin Martyr's

1327
01:10:25.600 --> 01:10:29.079
<v Speaker 2>way that he describes the Father and the logos, because

1328
01:10:29.119 --> 01:10:31.560
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like the way Philo.

1329
01:10:32.720 --> 01:10:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Describes the two powers of heaven. So that's possibly a reference.

1330
01:10:38.279 --> 01:10:41.960
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know about early Jewish Benitarianism or something

1331
01:10:42.039 --> 01:10:44.119
<v Speaker 2>like that other than what today's scholars talk about.

1332
01:10:44.319 --> 01:10:45.800
<v Speaker 21>Gotcha, Okay, I'll make a note of that.

1333
01:10:45.800 --> 01:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate its.

1334
01:10:47.399 --> 01:10:48.760
<v Speaker 5>Father doing Sir as well.

1335
01:10:48.960 --> 01:10:51.000
<v Speaker 10>I don't know if you noticed this, Jay, but I

1336
01:10:51.279 --> 01:10:53.319
<v Speaker 10>I tweeted something out about this a little while ago

1337
01:10:53.479 --> 01:10:57.119
<v Speaker 10>about how Evangelicals view other Christians and this kind of

1338
01:10:57.159 --> 01:11:00.640
<v Speaker 10>relates to every Middle War, every more than the Middle

1339
01:11:00.640 --> 01:11:03.439
<v Speaker 10>East we've had. But have you ever noticed that evangelicals

1340
01:11:03.479 --> 01:11:07.520
<v Speaker 10>they view Americans who are Orthodox in particular as less

1341
01:11:07.640 --> 01:11:11.560
<v Speaker 10>American than them, and they simultaneously view Middle Eastern you know,

1342
01:11:11.720 --> 01:11:15.039
<v Speaker 10>Arabs who are Orthodox Christians, they view them as like

1343
01:11:15.199 --> 01:11:19.119
<v Speaker 10>ethnically or racially Islamic. That's why they're so cavalier with

1344
01:11:19.880 --> 01:11:22.079
<v Speaker 10>just make it a parking lot, you know, just bomb

1345
01:11:22.159 --> 01:11:24.039
<v Speaker 10>the place to hell. If you bring up to them,

1346
01:11:24.079 --> 01:11:26.600
<v Speaker 10>well what about like the one one point five million

1347
01:11:26.680 --> 01:11:28.760
<v Speaker 10>Christians in Iran? They just kind of look at you

1348
01:11:28.880 --> 01:11:30.600
<v Speaker 10>with you know, eyes place owners.

1349
01:11:30.680 --> 01:11:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, John, Karayoku brought it up to me and to

1350
01:11:34.199 --> 01:11:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Alex Jones when he was on with Alex because he

1351
01:11:36.800 --> 01:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>said that when he taught at Liberty University, because he

1352
01:11:40.720 --> 01:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>used to teach intelligence courses as well as being a

1353
01:11:43.039 --> 01:11:47.119
<v Speaker 2>CIO operative, he said that he could never get them

1354
01:11:47.159 --> 01:11:51.319
<v Speaker 2>to understand that that the original Christians are out of

1355
01:11:51.479 --> 01:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Syrian Antioch. So the original Christians are actually Arab converts

1356
01:11:55.880 --> 01:11:58.760
<v Speaker 2>at Syrian Antioch, right, because the people they're first called

1357
01:11:58.840 --> 01:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Christians at Antioch. And he said he could never get

1358
01:12:01.840 --> 01:12:06.239
<v Speaker 2>these dumb dumps to understand that that's actual Christianity. It's

1359
01:12:06.359 --> 01:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>not you know, you're John Aikey run around on the

1360
01:12:10.039 --> 01:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>stage blowing a show.

1361
01:12:11.119 --> 01:12:11.239
<v Speaker 12>Far.

1362
01:12:11.640 --> 01:12:11.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1363
01:12:11.880 --> 01:12:14.199
<v Speaker 10>And that's another just to point out something you've touched

1364
01:12:14.239 --> 01:12:16.199
<v Speaker 10>on before, because I think you spoke about this, is like,

1365
01:12:16.239 --> 01:12:20.439
<v Speaker 10>how could we ever have Christian nationalism in America when

1366
01:12:20.800 --> 01:12:23.159
<v Speaker 10>you know, the largest Protestant group that being you know,

1367
01:12:23.439 --> 01:12:29.119
<v Speaker 10>the broad group of Evangelicalism. Uh, they openly don't view

1368
01:12:29.520 --> 01:12:32.880
<v Speaker 10>Orthodox Christians as Christians. They kind of give lip service

1369
01:12:32.960 --> 01:12:36.119
<v Speaker 10>to Roman Catholics. But you know, there's no real coming

1370
01:12:36.159 --> 01:12:37.840
<v Speaker 10>to get out of these people, especially when they've just

1371
01:12:37.880 --> 01:12:42.840
<v Speaker 10>been so intellectually captured through Zionism. They don't even realize it.

1372
01:12:43.079 --> 01:12:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1373
01:12:43.319 --> 01:12:46.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's like Doug Wilson said the other day, if

1374
01:12:46.560 --> 01:12:49.279
<v Speaker 2>if his Christian nationalism comes about, you won't have any

1375
01:12:49.520 --> 01:12:52.760
<v Speaker 2>icons or images of Maria in public. So it's like, yeah,

1376
01:12:52.800 --> 01:12:55.000
<v Speaker 2>good luck with Christian nationalism with that loser.

1377
01:12:55.359 --> 01:12:57.760
<v Speaker 6>All right, I'm gonna be I'm gonna play Devil's advocate

1378
01:12:57.880 --> 01:13:00.359
<v Speaker 6>right now. By the way, if you don't know that

1379
01:13:00.439 --> 01:13:04.720
<v Speaker 6>actually comes from Papism. They literally have courts with Devil's

1380
01:13:04.800 --> 01:13:12.239
<v Speaker 6>advocates to argue against canonization of saints. Yes, okay, suppose

1381
01:13:12.640 --> 01:13:16.159
<v Speaker 6>suppose I'm going to push back and say, well, maybe

1382
01:13:16.199 --> 01:13:20.159
<v Speaker 6>the problem is just the Doug Wilson evangelical But what

1383
01:13:20.319 --> 01:13:25.319
<v Speaker 6>if you if Christian nationalism simply meant that, in terms

1384
01:13:25.359 --> 01:13:29.920
<v Speaker 6>of immigration policies, you don't let non Christians come into

1385
01:13:29.960 --> 01:13:30.359
<v Speaker 6>the country.

1386
01:13:30.600 --> 01:13:34.199
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I could see that being a possible, like

1387
01:13:34.319 --> 01:13:37.479
<v Speaker 10>alla branch, we would extend to them. But as soon

1388
01:13:37.520 --> 01:13:39.880
<v Speaker 10>as you point out to them that, hey, that means

1389
01:13:40.560 --> 01:13:44.479
<v Speaker 10>dual citizens from Israel, that means all non Christians, not

1390
01:13:44.800 --> 01:13:49.119
<v Speaker 10>just you know, Muslims, because they obviously Evangelicals don't want

1391
01:13:49.119 --> 01:13:50.760
<v Speaker 10>any Muslims here. But if you say that extends to

1392
01:13:50.840 --> 01:13:54.039
<v Speaker 10>all non Christians, that includes Jews, then they would just

1393
01:13:54.119 --> 01:13:55.640
<v Speaker 10>fight you tooth and nail over that, and that would

1394
01:13:55.640 --> 01:13:57.199
<v Speaker 10>be the end of that conversation entirely.

1395
01:13:57.920 --> 01:13:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeh.

1396
01:13:59.439 --> 01:14:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I got to the way to shut it down too,

1397
01:14:00.960 --> 01:14:04.560
<v Speaker 2>because I used to be amongst the Christian reconstructionist camp,

1398
01:14:04.640 --> 01:14:07.359
<v Speaker 2>which is what Doug Wilson is. And when I was

1399
01:14:07.479 --> 01:14:11.039
<v Speaker 2>amongst that group, when I was like nineteen, there was

1400
01:14:11.119 --> 01:14:14.560
<v Speaker 2>this stupid debate which is so like out of touch

1401
01:14:14.600 --> 01:14:17.439
<v Speaker 2>with reality because you have this little tiny Presbyterian sect

1402
01:14:18.039 --> 01:14:21.039
<v Speaker 2>and you're within the sect, people are dividing the church

1403
01:14:21.119 --> 01:14:25.840
<v Speaker 2>and debating over whether or not in the Christian Reconstructionists

1404
01:14:26.600 --> 01:14:30.319
<v Speaker 2>state whether or not people who violate the Sabbath would

1405
01:14:30.319 --> 01:14:33.199
<v Speaker 2>be put to death. Because so, how are you going

1406
01:14:33.239 --> 01:14:36.079
<v Speaker 2>to have a Christian nationalism when you have Puritans who

1407
01:14:36.159 --> 01:14:39.720
<v Speaker 2>believe that if you do something on the Sabbath on Sunday,

1408
01:14:40.319 --> 01:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>even if you're not a Christian, you've got to be

1409
01:14:41.920 --> 01:14:42.479
<v Speaker 2>put to death.

1410
01:14:42.720 --> 01:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And so this is how idiotic this shit is.

1411
01:14:45.760 --> 01:14:48.560
<v Speaker 6>Okay, you see what I'm saying, though, why not just

1412
01:14:48.680 --> 01:14:51.319
<v Speaker 6>get them to agree to Does that mean all versions

1413
01:14:51.319 --> 01:14:55.119
<v Speaker 6>of the Christian nationalism wouldn't work, or like, for example,

1414
01:14:55.880 --> 01:14:57.479
<v Speaker 6>do you think you can get Doug Wilson. It may

1415
01:14:57.600 --> 01:15:01.880
<v Speaker 6>be like, Okay, that's not going to work, but you could,

1416
01:15:02.079 --> 01:15:05.560
<v Speaker 6>generally speaking in terms of immigration, just be like, yeah,

1417
01:15:06.079 --> 01:15:09.479
<v Speaker 6>this is what we you know, generally consider Christians, and

1418
01:15:09.800 --> 01:15:14.159
<v Speaker 6>so they're ever getting a priority in terms of citizenship

1419
01:15:14.279 --> 01:15:18.119
<v Speaker 6>and voting or other religions are not allowed because you

1420
01:15:18.279 --> 01:15:20.840
<v Speaker 6>do kind of have some of these principles even in

1421
01:15:21.079 --> 01:15:25.239
<v Speaker 6>early immigration policies that obviously change after nineteen sixty five.

1422
01:15:25.800 --> 01:15:29.239
<v Speaker 6>But in terms of who gets priority immigrating into to

1423
01:15:29.399 --> 01:15:34.119
<v Speaker 6>the United States, we're obviously Christian, you know, you're certain,

1424
01:15:34.840 --> 01:15:37.520
<v Speaker 6>and there was like a tier right in terms of

1425
01:15:38.560 --> 01:15:42.600
<v Speaker 6>what country in Europe obviously Anglo like from England and

1426
01:15:42.600 --> 01:15:45.359
<v Speaker 6>stuff like that had priority over you know, Irish and

1427
01:15:45.399 --> 01:15:48.159
<v Speaker 6>stuff like that. Do you think that that's in my

1428
01:15:48.359 --> 01:15:53.439
<v Speaker 6>logical possible world argument that I just made logically impossible.

1429
01:15:54.119 --> 01:15:57.960
<v Speaker 10>I mean again, I think that's a solid ALI branch

1430
01:15:58.039 --> 01:15:59.800
<v Speaker 10>to reach out to them. But then I think the

1431
01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:03.880
<v Speaker 10>other side of this is that, you know, the crazy

1432
01:16:03.960 --> 01:16:06.800
<v Speaker 10>prods from Doug Wilson to like your you know, your

1433
01:16:06.840 --> 01:16:10.239
<v Speaker 10>boomer evangelical the one thing they all agree on to

1434
01:16:10.359 --> 01:16:13.039
<v Speaker 10>the you know, to the death is Zionism, And like

1435
01:16:13.079 --> 01:16:15.840
<v Speaker 10>I said, they're just so intellectually captured by that. So

1436
01:16:15.960 --> 01:16:17.560
<v Speaker 10>you have Doug Wilson on one side, but then in

1437
01:16:17.600 --> 01:16:20.199
<v Speaker 10>the end you have all these other evangelicals that are

1438
01:16:20.239 --> 01:16:21.960
<v Speaker 10>the exact opposo when it comes to christian Now. So

1439
01:16:22.399 --> 01:16:24.119
<v Speaker 10>a lot of them are pushing for like Vivek to

1440
01:16:24.199 --> 01:16:26.399
<v Speaker 10>be governor of Ohio and.

1441
01:16:26.439 --> 01:16:27.000
<v Speaker 14>Stuff like that.

1442
01:16:27.800 --> 01:16:31.000
<v Speaker 10>So they're on opposite spectrums of like things like immigration.

1443
01:16:31.520 --> 01:16:35.439
<v Speaker 10>As far as you know, they don't view legalized American

1444
01:16:35.479 --> 01:16:38.800
<v Speaker 10>citizens quote unquote as being part of the problem as well.

1445
01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:40.720
<v Speaker 10>But the one thing they agree on at the end

1446
01:16:40.760 --> 01:16:43.000
<v Speaker 10>of the day is Zionism, and that's like the anchor

1447
01:16:43.199 --> 01:16:46.399
<v Speaker 10>to all of their political ideology. It's kind of crazy

1448
01:16:46.479 --> 01:16:49.840
<v Speaker 10>to see, but I could liken it too when it

1449
01:16:49.880 --> 01:16:54.079
<v Speaker 10>comes to modern Middle Eastern politics that we're dealing with

1450
01:16:54.159 --> 01:16:57.039
<v Speaker 10>with Iran right now and trying to clean up our

1451
01:16:57.039 --> 01:16:59.600
<v Speaker 10>government and get people who are actually are Christian and government.

1452
01:17:00.800 --> 01:17:03.560
<v Speaker 10>Zionism to them is like their COVID. You know, it's

1453
01:17:03.600 --> 01:17:06.159
<v Speaker 10>like we can see it. We obviously know what the

1454
01:17:06.239 --> 01:17:06.680
<v Speaker 10>problem is.

1455
01:17:06.760 --> 01:17:07.479
<v Speaker 5>We know it's a scam.

1456
01:17:07.640 --> 01:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, look they all signed that that agreement, right James White.

1457
01:17:12.560 --> 01:17:14.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't I can't remember if Doug Wilson sunder or not.

1458
01:17:14.520 --> 01:17:18.199
<v Speaker 2>But all those evangelical coopers signed this big giant Zionists agreement.

1459
01:17:18.239 --> 01:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember that?

1460
01:17:19.039 --> 01:17:21.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Well that's why I don't understand the argument we

1461
01:17:22.079 --> 01:17:24.840
<v Speaker 5>have that in right now. Like, so I don't understand

1462
01:17:24.880 --> 01:17:26.680
<v Speaker 5>what the difference would be.

1463
01:17:27.520 --> 01:17:29.439
<v Speaker 10>Well again like but the problem is is that with

1464
01:17:30.079 --> 01:17:35.800
<v Speaker 10>if Zionism is your grounding foundational belief structure within all,

1465
01:17:36.399 --> 01:17:41.039
<v Speaker 10>within the majority of Protestantism, which it is, Unfortunately, at

1466
01:17:41.079 --> 01:17:43.119
<v Speaker 10>the end of the day, you're gonna do whatever the

1467
01:17:43.239 --> 01:17:47.760
<v Speaker 10>Zionists want, and Desigonists do not want a white Christian,

1468
01:17:48.520 --> 01:17:51.359
<v Speaker 10>you know, right, Erica, I see, Yeah.

1469
01:17:51.239 --> 01:17:53.439
<v Speaker 5>That's a great point. There's the missing premise right there.

1470
01:17:53.560 --> 01:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1471
01:17:53.920 --> 01:17:55.319
<v Speaker 5>I mean, look at bebing At in Yahoo.

1472
01:17:55.399 --> 01:17:58.640
<v Speaker 10>And people always forget this because every Trump thought, who

1473
01:17:58.880 --> 01:18:02.960
<v Speaker 10>is a massive, massive Zionists, always overlooks the fact that

1474
01:18:03.079 --> 01:18:08.479
<v Speaker 10>the largest outspoken person against Trump's Muslim ban. And if

1475
01:18:08.479 --> 01:18:09.920
<v Speaker 10>you guys remember that it was a Muslim ban, that

1476
01:18:10.039 --> 01:18:13.560
<v Speaker 10>wasn't Muslim ban, but was the person against it who

1477
01:18:13.560 --> 01:18:16.279
<v Speaker 10>has allowed us was being that Yahoo beaming nat Yahoo,

1478
01:18:16.319 --> 01:18:18.399
<v Speaker 10>you can find I think it's in herrets or it's

1479
01:18:18.439 --> 01:18:18.880
<v Speaker 10>in the Hill.

1480
01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:20.560
<v Speaker 5>I can't remember which publication has it.

1481
01:18:20.640 --> 01:18:22.880
<v Speaker 10>But he came out and said that he was totally

1482
01:18:22.920 --> 01:18:27.279
<v Speaker 10>against the Muslim ban, that Israel is an open, you know, diverse,

1483
01:18:27.439 --> 01:18:31.079
<v Speaker 10>egalitarian society, and we oppose such practices by the American

1484
01:18:31.119 --> 01:18:31.720
<v Speaker 10>government by that.

1485
01:18:31.880 --> 01:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But he also said he wanted us to take all

1486
01:18:34.039 --> 01:18:36.319
<v Speaker 1>of the Muslims from Palestine, exactly.

1487
01:18:36.680 --> 01:18:40.399
<v Speaker 10>And that's that's exactly why whether he wants to launch

1488
01:18:40.439 --> 01:18:42.479
<v Speaker 10>a bunch of wars, bomb a bunch of places and

1489
01:18:42.560 --> 01:18:45.159
<v Speaker 10>then force all the immigrants into America, at the end

1490
01:18:45.159 --> 01:18:47.560
<v Speaker 10>of the day, if you're an evangelical and your underlying

1491
01:18:47.600 --> 01:18:50.680
<v Speaker 10>principle is Zionism, then you're obviously going to be like, Okay,

1492
01:18:50.720 --> 01:18:54.359
<v Speaker 10>we're going to put immigration border security, trying to make

1493
01:18:54.439 --> 01:18:57.880
<v Speaker 10>our country, you know, more homogenized, safer, cleaner, and more

1494
01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.520
<v Speaker 10>Christian or and put that on the backburn and do

1495
01:19:00.640 --> 01:19:01.560
<v Speaker 10>whatever Debe tells us.

1496
01:19:02.119 --> 01:19:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, And that's why they're stupid ass idiots, and that's.

1497
01:19:05.720 --> 01:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Why they're the they're the reason why the countries collapse.

1498
01:19:08.680 --> 01:19:09.359
<v Speaker 5>And they don't see it.

1499
01:19:09.479 --> 01:19:12.439
<v Speaker 10>They're all stuck in this dark, deep pre list. And

1500
01:19:13.199 --> 01:19:15.239
<v Speaker 10>because they're in pre list, you can even point out

1501
01:19:15.279 --> 01:19:17.279
<v Speaker 10>to them. There's been a couple of people and write

1502
01:19:17.279 --> 01:19:19.159
<v Speaker 10>with media will I've said to them, hey, look up

1503
01:19:19.159 --> 01:19:20.960
<v Speaker 10>the term preless because I think you're in it right now,

1504
01:19:21.479 --> 01:19:24.920
<v Speaker 10>and you know, just crickets. They don't understand that they're

1505
01:19:25.720 --> 01:19:28.640
<v Speaker 10>you know, captured intellectually and and honestly, it's a problem

1506
01:19:28.640 --> 01:19:29.000
<v Speaker 10>with the heart.

1507
01:19:29.159 --> 01:19:29.760
<v Speaker 5>They don't get that

1508
01:19:38.439 --> 01:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Monkey outside sound, that a smile, what you're doing someth
