Speaker 1: Bill cunning in the Great American Welcome this laurious Tuesday
Speaker 1: afternoon in the Tri State. Coming up later will be
Speaker 1: Jeff crue Air from New Orleans about the effect of
Speaker 1: patient migration in Louisiana and so much more. Plus Reds
Speaker 1: Baseball kicksaw First pitch is six forty tonight, last home
Speaker 1: stand of the season. Six big games here. These are
Speaker 1: against the Braves, and we'll see what happens down the road.
Speaker 1: Plus the Bengals. Bengals are getting ready for the Commandos.
Speaker 1: I know they're the Commanders, but I call them the Commandos.
Speaker 1: We'll be here and maybe they're Bengals can get a
Speaker 1: win at some point. But joining you and I now
Speaker 1: is Rob Sanders, the Kent County Prosecutor. And Rob Sanders
Speaker 1: welcome again into Bill Cunningham Show.
Speaker 2: And Rob, how are you doing?
Speaker 3: Fantastic? Willie? I think Washington want to listen to your Commandos.
Speaker 3: Sounds like a much better team name than Commanders.
Speaker 1: That's one of my favorite movies. I mean, Commanders doesn't
Speaker 1: sound right, but I call them the Commandos. I often
Speaker 1: go commando style. The ladies seem to like that. That's
Speaker 1: a different issue.
Speaker 3: It would probably up all of their sales, of all
Speaker 3: their merchandise. You know, everybody would be wearing their jerseys
Speaker 3: if it's a commando.
Speaker 1: On the front, not commanders. But that's a different issue.
Speaker 1: Many issues, so little time. First of all, there was
Speaker 1: a news conference this morning with the Attorney General of
Speaker 1: the state of Florida and also run to Santas the governor.
Speaker 1: I want to get your reaction to this as a
Speaker 1: law enforcement official of great no maybe the dominant character
Speaker 1: next to Melissa Powers, but nonetheless.
Speaker 2: Than the tri State.
Speaker 1: And the point was made which the media hated when
Speaker 1: it was made, and that is the FEDS a couple
Speaker 1: of years ago raid at the home of Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: spent about six hours inside of his home going through
Speaker 1: drawers and pockets and closets and everything. Milania Trump was
Speaker 1: particularly outraged at the condition. I measured her closet looks
Speaker 1: like a house, and nonetheless, they left her personal items
Speaker 1: strewn all over the Florida took pictures. It was disgusting,
Speaker 1: and US attorney and Miami authorized it through Washington. I'm
Speaker 1: sure that the Biden administration, Mary Garland, because you don't
Speaker 1: raid a president's home unless you have good evidence. Of course,
Speaker 1: you could have rated the home at Joe Biden. They
Speaker 1: didn't do that, or the home of Hillary Clinton, they
Speaker 1: didn't do that. But nonetheless, I regress, and the governor
Speaker 1: said that the same folks who authorized the raid on
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's personal residence about the so called documents case,
Speaker 1: which by the way, has now been thrown out of
Speaker 1: court completely, are the same persons that are now prosecuting
Speaker 1: the guy, Ryan William Routh, who was trying to assassinate
Speaker 1: the president. So he made the point, I don't trust
Speaker 1: these individuals to give us a fair, objective investigation of
Speaker 1: Routh and what his motives are.
Speaker 2: He lived in Hawaii.
Speaker 1: He somehow made his way from Hawaii to Palm Beach
Speaker 1: County with little or no money. Somehow he picked up
Speaker 1: a car that might have been stolen. How long was
Speaker 1: he there? He was in the sniper's nest for twelve hours,
Speaker 1: I said, twelve hours, getting ready to assassinate Trump, who
Speaker 1: was very close to having a bullet in his head. Again, nonetheless,
Speaker 1: he said, I don't trust the FEDS to make a
Speaker 1: good investigation. When the Secret Service failed again, when the
Speaker 1: USA attorney who is going to conduct the investigation authorized
Speaker 1: the search warrant against Donald Trump's personal residence, and the
Speaker 1: same FBI US marshalls who rated Trump's home are the
Speaker 1: same persons to investigate. Ralph, can you smell what I'm cooking?
Speaker 1: Can you smell what this Sands is cooking?
Speaker 3: Absolutely? Willie. I think the major question here is not
Speaker 3: the question of the investigation of what went on on
Speaker 3: the golf course, because it sounds like the Secret Service
Speaker 3: actually did their job on the golf course. They had
Speaker 3: a guy out front who was sweeping the sixth hole
Speaker 3: to make sure there were no threats to the president
Speaker 3: the former president. As he made his way from the
Speaker 3: fifth hold to the sixth hole, he found the guy
Speaker 3: with the gun. He shot at him and got him
Speaker 3: out of there, and he was quickly captured by law enforcement.
Speaker 3: Sounds like the Secret Service actually did their job with
Speaker 3: what they had to work with. There. Where the Secret
Speaker 3: Services failed and what I have great questions about whether
Speaker 3: or not there will be any investigation into, much less
Speaker 3: a competent one is how on earth did this jack
Speaker 3: joker know that Donald Trump was even going to be
Speaker 3: golfing that morning. By all reports I've seen that this
Speaker 3: was a spur of the moment off the books movement
Speaker 3: of the former president. He didn't announce it, it wasn't
Speaker 3: on his public calendar. Nobody, you know. It wasn't like
Speaker 3: he was playing in a golf outing or something. This
Speaker 3: was more like the president, the former president said Hey,
Speaker 3: it's Sunday morning. I think I'm going to go play golf.
Speaker 3: Now the Secret Service. You know, there's three different Trump
Speaker 3: golf courses in South Florida. How did this guy know
Speaker 3: that Trump was going to be out there on this
Speaker 3: one of the three courses on this day, Because I
Speaker 3: think it's highly unlikely that he just packed up some
Speaker 3: snacks and got his AK forty seven and decided to
Speaker 3: go hide in a bush and just hoping that Trump
Speaker 3: might feel like playing golf that day. That just seems
Speaker 3: awfully far fetched to me. So that the investigation I'm
Speaker 3: calling for, the one I want to know about, is
Speaker 3: who tipped this guy off that, Hey, Trump's playing golf
Speaker 3: tomorrow morning, you might want to be there, because that
Speaker 3: person is complicit in an effort to assassinate the former
Speaker 3: president of the United States and the current Republican front
Speaker 3: runner for presidency or the nominee I should say for presidency.
Speaker 1: I spoke to your friend and mine Hannity, who's played
Speaker 1: golf there with him, and whole number five, the green
Speaker 1: is more or less up against the boulevard. And then
Speaker 1: when you get to whole number six, which is the
Speaker 1: one in question, it's a short par par four. They
Speaker 1: play at about three hundred and fifty yards. So is Trump
Speaker 1: what was putting out on five? That's when the shots
Speaker 1: were fired by the Secret Service, and everybody hit the deck. However,
Speaker 1: if they would have waited another couple minutes, they would
Speaker 1: have got the carts gone about fifty yards to the
Speaker 1: tee of number six, hit the ball in six, hopefully
Speaker 1: in the fairway. Then Trump would have been in his
Speaker 1: cart rolling toward his ball in the middle of the fairway,
Speaker 1: about one hundred yards from the sniper's nest, and he
Speaker 1: would have been coming at the sniper. And so the
Speaker 1: odds of a successful headshot this time was almost one
Speaker 1: hundred percent. And so for those who say, well, no
Speaker 1: shots were fired, the media loves to say that rout
Speaker 1: there were no shots fired, But the fact the matter is,
Speaker 1: two or three minutes later he would have been in
Speaker 1: a perfect situation, sitting in a golf cart riding toward
Speaker 1: the sniper with an AK and a scope that is
Speaker 1: less than a two inch putt, and so this was
Speaker 1: again in a tremendous policy failure of the Secret Service.
Speaker 1: Their argument as well, we didn't know about this because
Speaker 1: Trump didn't get in from Utah until about three in
Speaker 1: the morning, and so he got up at six or
Speaker 1: seven am, hit a light breakfast. About noontime, he said,
Speaker 1: let's go play golf. He called a couple guys, only
Speaker 1: one could play, picked up a couple of pro assistant
Speaker 1: pros at the club there, and started playing golf.
Speaker 2: So was he sitting there every day?
Speaker 1: Did he know that Trump was in the air at
Speaker 1: three o'clock in the morning, He wasn't scheduled to play golf.
Speaker 1: How did he know he was there? And who funded
Speaker 1: all this stuff? The AK seemingly was stolen or whatever.
Speaker 1: But this guy had access to some serious money just
Speaker 1: to travel from Hawaii. How did he get there? Did
Speaker 1: he fly to la then Atlanta? Come down? How do
Speaker 1: all that happen? And this guy's got a fifty page
Speaker 1: criminal record, including possession of weapons of mass destruction. This
Speaker 1: guy was a nut job and a crook who thought
Speaker 1: his life should have been spent in Ukraine, kind of
Speaker 1: recruiting moujah Joheen fighters from Afghanistan to come to the Ukraine,
Speaker 1: and so all this thing makes no sense. But the
Speaker 1: point De Santas is making is this, those conducting this
Speaker 1: investigation have a bet on the fact that Trump's going
Speaker 1: to be convicted of crimes in their jurisdiction. On one hand,
Speaker 1: Trump is the defendant. On the other hand, Trump is
Speaker 1: a victim. And can you trust the feedg to be fair?
Speaker 1: The answer is no.
Speaker 3: Well, I know this, Willy. If they're going to prosecute
Speaker 3: this guy and prosecute Trump at the same time, they
Speaker 3: better seek a maximum sentence for this guy, because anything
Speaker 3: less than that, it's going to look like they are
Speaker 3: showing favoritism, or they're going easy on them, or they
Speaker 3: have a conflict of interest, is the bottom line. I
Speaker 3: have had cases in the past. You recall we talked
Speaker 3: about Timothy de la Anti, a guy convicted of the
Speaker 3: cold case murder of Paul Clayton and Elsmere Well. He
Speaker 3: subsequently attacked another guy that was in jail who I
Speaker 3: was also prosecuting for murder and tried to choke him
Speaker 3: to death inside a recreation yard in the Kent County
Speaker 3: Detention Center. I prosecuted Timothy Dela Hanty for that attack
Speaker 3: as well, even though I was prosecuting the victim. But
Speaker 3: the difference is I got a life sentence for Daily Handy,
Speaker 3: So nobody's going to be able to say that I
Speaker 3: was going easy on them. The question becomes, are they
Speaker 3: going to do that in South Florida? Is that US
Speaker 3: Attorney's Office going to seek a maximum punishment? You know,
Speaker 3: there's all kinds of questions about this, Willie. How has
Speaker 3: anybody that's ever been convicted of possession of a weapon
Speaker 3: of mass destruction allowed to fly? Shouldn't that guy be
Speaker 3: on a no flylist? Or was he on the no
Speaker 3: fly list? The other question about the Secret Service is,
Speaker 3: you know, if these bushes that they've been talking about,
Speaker 3: everybody says, well, the paparazzi used to hide in those
Speaker 3: bushes and take pictures of Trump while he was golf.
Speaker 3: And if those bushes are known to have people hiding
Speaker 3: out at them, whether they're snipers or paparazzi, don't you
Speaker 3: think the Secret Service when they found out, okay, Trump's
Speaker 3: going to the golf course, maybe we should go, you know,
Speaker 3: shake the bushes, literally shake the bushes and see what
Speaker 3: falls out before he even gets on the golf course,
Speaker 3: Why are they waiting til the fifth hole to go
Speaker 3: check the play that they know people have hidden out
Speaker 3: before on that golf course. You would think, even with
Speaker 3: what they've reported is limited resources in the limited security
Speaker 3: detail that Trump gets as a former president and is
Speaker 3: the current front runner or is the current Republican nominee,
Speaker 3: why he's getting a limited detail is beyond me. You
Speaker 3: think he would get the same detail that Biden and
Speaker 3: the vice president do at this point. But nevertheless, you'd
Speaker 3: think they can find somebody even if they called up
Speaker 3: the Sheriff's department said hey, can you do us a
Speaker 3: favor go check that this book is where we know
Speaker 3: people hide out. Absolutely, it wasn't done.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Secondly, the Inquirer Cincinnati is running a guest editorial and
Speaker 1: what the editorial writer says that Donald Trump's behavior brought
Speaker 1: about his own assassination attempt. And this woman goes on
Speaker 1: to say, of course, there's no place for politics that
Speaker 1: bring violence in America. But and then she goes over
Speaker 1: a menu of items and positions he's taken, like his
Speaker 1: position pushing lives about the legal immigrants in Springfield. He
Speaker 1: continues to insist he was not the loser of the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty election, continue to spread lies about our military
Speaker 1: rounding up and deporting i llgal aliens.
Speaker 2: She goes over the lesson said.
Speaker 1: Therefore, she says Trump's behavior brought about his own assassination attempt.
Speaker 1: So I would ask you, did your behavior bring about
Speaker 1: the behavior of Christopher Jackson, who you prosecuted for murder
Speaker 1: and put him in jail for thirty five years? And
Speaker 1: another point I'd like to make quickly if I may.
Speaker 1: On January the sixth, it is alleged that Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: words are sufficient to have him convicted of insurrection. He's
Speaker 1: under indictment in Washington for the words he used that
Speaker 1: encouraged some people about one to two hundred go into
Speaker 1: the US Capitol and commit crimes. So they're indicting Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and trying to put him in jail for twenty
Speaker 1: years for words he used that incentivize others. When I
Speaker 1: read the social media of Ryan William Routh, the words
Speaker 1: of Kamala Harris and the words of Joe Biden have
Speaker 1: been used by Rauth which caused him to want to
Speaker 1: kill Donald Trump. And so if Trump's being indicted for
Speaker 1: inciting violence, isn't it also true then that Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: who said we have to target Donald Trump. Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: says the constitution is over. Joe Biden said this is
Speaker 1: a threat to democracy. Joe Biden said, it's an existential
Speaker 1: threat to the constitution. Do those words incite the violence
Speaker 1: of ralth And should those two characters, Kamala Harris and
Speaker 1: Joe Biden be indicted under the same principles that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump has indted on January sixth when he said, peaceably,
Speaker 1: go to the Capitol.
Speaker 2: Can you smell what I'm cooking?
Speaker 3: Absolutely? William the media is complicit in this. Now. It
Speaker 3: makes me seriously wonder is the media trying to get
Speaker 3: Donald Trump assassinated? Because in my lifetime I have never
Speaker 3: seen anyone who even remotely claims to be a legitimate
Speaker 3: journalist make the judgment calls that the current media is making.
Speaker 3: In fact, it went so far as that the ABC
Speaker 3: moderators in the debate we're calling out Donald Trump, of
Speaker 3: course didn't call out Harris Vice President Harris not once
Speaker 3: in that debate. It's saying anything that they disagreed with
Speaker 3: They didn't fact check her at all, And then they
Speaker 3: turn around and they fact check Trump. They tell him
Speaker 3: he's a liar. They tell the American people he's lying
Speaker 3: when they're splitting such hairs as well. Were they Asians
Speaker 3: eating cats or family pets in Springfield or were they
Speaker 3: eating them in Canton, Ohio? The bottom line is there's
Speaker 3: police bodycam video of immigrants being accused of eating someone's
Speaker 3: pet cat. I've seen it. You've seen it. Anybody that's
Speaker 3: been on social media has seen it. Now, whether that
Speaker 3: was in Springfield or whether that was in Canton, or
Speaker 3: whether that was just, you know, right across the river
Speaker 3: in Hamilton County somewhere, does it really matter. But no,
Speaker 3: does the media say, well, I think you have the
Speaker 3: town wrong, President Trump. But nevertheless, this is the issue. No,
Speaker 3: they just flied out call a liar. They've called it,
Speaker 3: They've demonized him, They've called him a liar. I'm not
Speaker 3: even a big Trump fan in the grand scheme of things.
Speaker 3: I like his policies, but man, he drives me crazy
Speaker 3: with his social media, especially sometimes in some of the
Speaker 3: self inflicted wounds. But that doesn't excuse the media to
Speaker 3: turn him in to someone who is a target that
Speaker 3: quite frankly, they have demonized to the point that there
Speaker 3: are lunatics out there, like this guy that flew in
Speaker 3: from Hawaii to try and take him out, like the
Speaker 3: lunatic that tried to kill them in Pennsylvania. That they
Speaker 3: take the media signals is just that signals commands. They
Speaker 3: take them as suggestions that they should go carry out
Speaker 3: what the media is quietly suggesting that they do, or
Speaker 3: that it's you know, they're insinuating that this needs to
Speaker 3: be done, and the media is picking up on words
Speaker 3: being used by the vice president that we're being used
Speaker 3: by Biden before he dropped out of the race, that
Speaker 3: are being used by other talking heads on the Democratic side.
Speaker 3: They're not so subtle suggestions that someone should go do
Speaker 3: harm to former President Trump, and that's exactly what we're
Speaker 3: seeing them do.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 1: Trump'son dining for inciting violence, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris by
Speaker 1: that standard is inciding violence against Donald Trump. But I
Speaker 1: don't maybe the mainstream media has a lot to do
Speaker 1: with it also, and possibly it's a weapon of mass
Speaker 1: distraction instead of dealing with the issue of twenty thousand,
Speaker 1: Can you imagine, Covington's a lot larger than Springfield, Ohio.
Speaker 1: But what if twenty thousand Haitians are dropped by parachuting
Speaker 1: Covington and said live right there, go ahead, and there's
Speaker 1: twenty thousand Haitians walking around Covington. The issue is not
Speaker 1: cats and dogs and geese. The issue is dropping twenty
Speaker 1: thousand Haitians in hundreds of American cities and others and
Speaker 1: say live with it. Locals have to deal with the
Speaker 1: rent and the crime and the recks, and the increase
Speaker 1: in insurance rates and the destruction of their way of life.
Speaker 1: When nobody voted for this, nobody in Springfield, Ohio said, Hey,
Speaker 1: by the way, Joe, can you bring in twenty thousand
Speaker 1: Haitians over the next two years. I had on Michael.
Speaker 1: I had on Mike DeWine about a week or two ago.
Speaker 1: Two years ago, there was four hundred Haitians in the
Speaker 1: public school system in Springfield. Today there's about two thousand
Speaker 1: Haitians and a public school system of about twenty five
Speaker 1: hundred students. And so how does that work when most
Speaker 1: do not speak of the English, all need EESL language.
Speaker 1: And so the issue is not about geese. The issue
Speaker 1: is about the destruction of a structure, and Mike DeWine
Speaker 1: is out in the highway patrol. He sends in nursing
Speaker 1: housing units, he sends in medical teams. Because it is
Speaker 1: a crisis, and so instead of describing that the crisis
Speaker 1: happening in Clark County, they deal with frick of seeing
Speaker 1: a dog?
Speaker 2: Or do you want to Tarrier for dinner? That's not
Speaker 2: the point.
Speaker 1: The point is the destruction of small town America and
Speaker 1: the collapse of our culture and economics based upon an
Speaker 1: immigration system that fits the long term goals of the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party to have more voters, but not the goals
Speaker 1: of Americans, black, white, and otherwise. While Rob Sanders, we
Speaker 1: can't even talk. I'm up against the clock. I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't know what to say.
Speaker 3: But not a problem. Will you just know this. I
Speaker 3: know it gets you fired up and pissed off, but
Speaker 3: just know it's not Haitians. It's immigrants from all over
Speaker 3: the place and every challenges they bring, especially when they
Speaker 3: don't speak English, so much so that I had a
Speaker 3: rape trials schets to go next week that had to
Speaker 3: be continued. It's getting bumped out for months now because
Speaker 3: the come aal with the Kentucky did not have enough
Speaker 3: French speaking interpreters this dependent. In this case, Angelo major
Speaker 3: Rata was charged with two counts of rape, a third
Speaker 3: degree rape for raping a child here in Kenton County.
Speaker 3: He's from some place in Africa where they speak French.
Speaker 3: I don't even know where he comes from. I just
Speaker 3: know that he speaks French. And we don't have enough
Speaker 3: French interpreters in the come o with the Kentucky to
Speaker 3: handle a trial right now, and it's going to take
Speaker 3: us months to line them up. But that's the kind
Speaker 3: of example of the stresses that are being put on
Speaker 3: our government and on our communities, our public safety, our
Speaker 3: way of life when we don't have the resources to
Speaker 3: deal with the influx of immigrants, when we aren't funded,
Speaker 3: we don't have the training, and we don't have the
Speaker 3: resources to deal with the influx of immigrants from other countries.
Speaker 3: It's that simple.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about female general mutilation later. But Rob Sanders,
Speaker 1: once again, thanks for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show.
Speaker 1: Good luck in godspeed and God bless America. Rob Sanders,
Speaker 1: thank you very much.
Speaker 3: Thanks Willie, have a great Tuesday. Take care.
Speaker 2: Let's go.
Speaker 1: Let's continue with more this afternoon coming up later as
Speaker 1: Reds Baseball and Jeff Corue Air rescheduled him to come
Speaker 1: on after one o'clock to talk about New Orleans and more.
Speaker 1: And I don't think the inquir is going to cover
Speaker 1: that rape case in Kenton County? Do you want to bet?
Speaker 1: Bill Cunningham, News Radio seven hundred WW