WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Ninety five miles an hour riding too his head.

2
00:00:05.799 --> 00:00:06.879
<v Speaker 2>He hopped down.

3
00:00:06.879 --> 00:00:11.839
<v Speaker 1>First with the lump bonius face, and on the very

4
00:00:12.039 --> 00:00:15.759
<v Speaker 1>next pitch he up and stole second phase.

5
00:00:17.760 --> 00:00:19.800
<v Speaker 3>With gretest speed.

6
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:28.039
<v Speaker 4>He wasn't born, he had yes uniform.

7
00:00:28.839 --> 00:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome to episode Neil Kotts of the Prospect

8
00:00:33.240 --> 00:00:36.719
<v Speaker 2>b Side Podcast. That's episode forty six. You all right

9
00:00:36.719 --> 00:00:38.039
<v Speaker 2>with Neil Katz there? Yeah?

10
00:00:38.840 --> 00:00:41.479
<v Speaker 3>Are we just gonna get more and more esoteric with it?

11
00:00:41.520 --> 00:00:44.240
<v Speaker 3>We need to just get deeper and deeper into the archives.

12
00:00:44.359 --> 00:00:46.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, we can't go we can't go like pretty boy

13
00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:49.679
<v Speaker 2>with it right. We can't go bat or maddingly or

14
00:00:49.759 --> 00:00:52.560
<v Speaker 2>with good point good point plus. You know what Neil

15
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Kotts has on those cats is that he was a

16
00:00:55.280 --> 00:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>member of the greatest team of our lifetimes and those

17
00:00:57.960 --> 00:01:01.399
<v Speaker 2>other fellows were not what two thousand have White Sox, dude.

18
00:01:01.159 --> 00:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>The greatest team of our lifetimes.

19
00:01:03.159 --> 00:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>The greatest single season team of our lifetimes. Yes, how

20
00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>do you? Okay?

21
00:01:07.400 --> 00:01:09.439
<v Speaker 3>You gotta explain that one a little more to me

22
00:01:10.079 --> 00:01:13.480
<v Speaker 3>that why is that other than your own fandom? Why

23
00:01:13.599 --> 00:01:14.879
<v Speaker 3>is that the greatest team?

24
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Wired wire first place, completely dominated. They used six starting pitchers,

25
00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:23.719
<v Speaker 2>the whole season. They lost once in the playoffs, and

26
00:01:23.719 --> 00:01:26.439
<v Speaker 2>mind you, they went four complete games in a row.

27
00:01:26.480 --> 00:01:29.519
<v Speaker 2>They absolutely wiped the floor with everybody. No one could

28
00:01:29.599 --> 00:01:31.359
<v Speaker 2>touch them. I don't remember how many games they want,

29
00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:34.840
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and some, but most dominant season of anyone

30
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:37.599
<v Speaker 2>in our lifetimes, in my opinion, Yeah, I don't know.

31
00:01:37.719 --> 00:01:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think in our lifetimes we also had

32
00:01:40.719 --> 00:01:42.879
<v Speaker 3>the two thousand and one Mariners that put up the

33
00:01:43.079 --> 00:01:47.319
<v Speaker 3>record for most wins in a season. We also had they.

34
00:01:47.280 --> 00:01:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Also didn't win a championship.

35
00:01:49.640 --> 00:01:52.400
<v Speaker 3>But I think you know enough about baseball that like,

36
00:01:52.519 --> 00:01:55.480
<v Speaker 3>the playoff winner is not the best team a lot

37
00:01:55.519 --> 00:01:55.959
<v Speaker 3>of the time.

38
00:01:56.280 --> 00:01:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, and.

39
00:01:57.400 --> 00:02:01.439
<v Speaker 3>It's a crash like who can It's definitely not. It's

40
00:02:01.480 --> 00:02:04.959
<v Speaker 3>a crapshoot who got hot and for a couple of weeks,

41
00:02:05.000 --> 00:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Like I think the playoffs, the playoff winner in baseball

42
00:02:11.560 --> 00:02:15.280
<v Speaker 3>is a really fun thing. And I think it's a

43
00:02:15.280 --> 00:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>fun tournament because it's unpredictable. It's not like the NBA Finals,

44
00:02:19.599 --> 00:02:22.199
<v Speaker 3>when you have the best team, you're making the finals

45
00:02:22.199 --> 00:02:24.680
<v Speaker 3>every time and unless you run into another all time

46
00:02:24.719 --> 00:02:27.840
<v Speaker 3>great team, you're gonna win. Baseball is different, and I

47
00:02:27.879 --> 00:02:30.280
<v Speaker 3>think that's a feature, not a bug. But I also

48
00:02:30.400 --> 00:02:32.840
<v Speaker 3>think that the discourse around you're not an all time

49
00:02:32.879 --> 00:02:36.439
<v Speaker 3>great team unless you win the championship is silly. Like

50
00:02:36.479 --> 00:02:39.039
<v Speaker 3>the Braves won in twenty twenty one the World Series,

51
00:02:39.240 --> 00:02:42.840
<v Speaker 3>and their teams the past three years have all for

52
00:02:42.879 --> 00:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>sure been better teams than the team that won the

53
00:02:45.439 --> 00:02:49.360
<v Speaker 3>World Series, And I think that that's like indicative of

54
00:02:49.560 --> 00:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>the way that baseball shakes out. They had like a

55
00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:54.800
<v Speaker 3>good team that got hot and beat a couple of

56
00:02:54.840 --> 00:02:57.080
<v Speaker 3>really good teams in the playoffs, but they were not

57
00:02:57.319 --> 00:02:59.800
<v Speaker 3>a great team, and they've had some great teams since.

58
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:01.560
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, I just think that's like.

59
00:03:01.639 --> 00:03:04.479
<v Speaker 2>The point is to be the best team in the tournament.

60
00:03:04.560 --> 00:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>That is the goal. Obviously you have to get to

61
00:03:06.879 --> 00:03:09.199
<v Speaker 2>the tournament. But regardless of all.

62
00:03:09.000 --> 00:03:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Of that, winning the tournament does not mean that you're

63
00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:14.599
<v Speaker 3>the best team in the tournament. I think that's what

64
00:03:14.639 --> 00:03:17.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying is that it's are you the best team

65
00:03:17.439 --> 00:03:21.240
<v Speaker 3>when you lose a season series against another team, like

66
00:03:21.520 --> 00:03:23.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's you know, fourteen games.

67
00:03:23.680 --> 00:03:26.479
<v Speaker 2>This is where the nerdiness of baseball just gets way

68
00:03:26.520 --> 00:03:28.919
<v Speaker 2>beyond me, Like I understand what you're saying, like in

69
00:03:28.960 --> 00:03:31.960
<v Speaker 2>a rodeo sense, maybe they weren't the best team or whatever.

70
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:34.080
<v Speaker 2>But you play the game on the field, you win

71
00:03:34.520 --> 00:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>on the field. It is the tournament that you have

72
00:03:36.560 --> 00:03:38.039
<v Speaker 2>to win if you want to get the trophy. But

73
00:03:38.080 --> 00:03:41.439
<v Speaker 2>that's the fairest or the greatest measurement.

74
00:03:41.919 --> 00:03:46.159
<v Speaker 3>That's potological, right, Like that's saying they're the best because

75
00:03:46.159 --> 00:03:49.080
<v Speaker 3>they're the best. And I think that the definition of

76
00:03:49.240 --> 00:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>the best players and the best teams are what's the

77
00:03:52.360 --> 00:03:55.800
<v Speaker 3>greatest collection of talent and the way that we can

78
00:03:55.919 --> 00:03:59.680
<v Speaker 3>best express that or best understand how that talent's expressed

79
00:03:59.840 --> 00:04:03.319
<v Speaker 3>is in scoring the most runs and preventing the most runs.

80
00:04:03.439 --> 00:04:06.840
<v Speaker 3>So teams that have the greatest pithag in history or

81
00:04:06.879 --> 00:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the greatest run differential in history, those are the teams

82
00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:13.159
<v Speaker 3>that are the most talented. Sometimes those teams win in

83
00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>older eras they tended to win a lot more often

84
00:04:15.879 --> 00:04:19.560
<v Speaker 3>in our current era, like with the wild card era,

85
00:04:19.879 --> 00:04:23.759
<v Speaker 3>that those teams absolutely can lose in a five game

86
00:04:23.839 --> 00:04:26.480
<v Speaker 3>series and a seven game series back to back to back.

87
00:04:26.600 --> 00:04:29.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's like looking at the past decade of

88
00:04:29.560 --> 00:04:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the Dodgers, you know, especially before last year, and being like, oh, well,

89
00:04:33.040 --> 00:04:36.120
<v Speaker 3>they have one short season championship, Like are they the

90
00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:39.279
<v Speaker 3>best team of the last ten years. Like, they're unquestionably

91
00:04:39.319 --> 00:04:41.439
<v Speaker 3>the best team of the last ten years. They've blown

92
00:04:41.639 --> 00:04:43.839
<v Speaker 3>everybody out of the water. The only other team that

93
00:04:43.879 --> 00:04:46.720
<v Speaker 3>has an even like remote argument for it is the

94
00:04:46.800 --> 00:04:50.279
<v Speaker 3>Houston Astros, and they also like cheated the shit out

95
00:04:50.279 --> 00:04:52.560
<v Speaker 3>of it for a couple of those years. So I

96
00:04:52.600 --> 00:04:55.160
<v Speaker 3>don't think that for me, you would look at the

97
00:04:55.199 --> 00:04:58.120
<v Speaker 3>past ten years and argue anybody else other than the

98
00:04:58.240 --> 00:05:02.519
<v Speaker 3>Dodgers as the best team. And they've just now won

99
00:05:02.680 --> 00:05:06.240
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote a real world series title, you know, And

100
00:05:05.879 --> 00:05:08.680
<v Speaker 3>that's where it's like, I think that's a different definition.

101
00:05:08.879 --> 00:05:11.319
<v Speaker 2>The problem with your side of it is though you're

102
00:05:11.480 --> 00:05:15.040
<v Speaker 2>measuring everything equally, like a home run in the seventh

103
00:05:15.040 --> 00:05:18.319
<v Speaker 2>inning back in April is not as meaningful as a

104
00:05:18.360 --> 00:05:22.480
<v Speaker 2>home run in October. Like I believe in CPA, and

105
00:05:22.680 --> 00:05:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I believe that baseball is a lot about timing. A

106
00:05:25.720 --> 00:05:27.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of it is timing, and not all home runs,

107
00:05:27.800 --> 00:05:31.319
<v Speaker 2>not all runs, not all runs given up are created equally, right.

108
00:05:31.279 --> 00:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't disagree with that. And that's why the single

109
00:05:34.759 --> 00:05:38.519
<v Speaker 3>highest CPA events are always in the playoffs, because that's

110
00:05:38.680 --> 00:05:42.160
<v Speaker 3>closer to the winner go home stage. But that's different

111
00:05:42.199 --> 00:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>from saying they're the best players. Like David Freese in

112
00:05:46.120 --> 00:05:50.360
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and whatever that was thirteen, wasn't the best player,

113
00:05:50.439 --> 00:05:52.480
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't the best player on his team. He wasn't

114
00:05:52.519 --> 00:05:54.120
<v Speaker 3>best player in the playoffs.

115
00:05:53.720 --> 00:05:56.040
<v Speaker 2>But he wracked up the CPA.

116
00:05:56.160 --> 00:05:58.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you're saying he's the best player of all time,

117
00:05:58.480 --> 00:05:59.680
<v Speaker 3>like he's he's the greatest.

118
00:06:00.079 --> 00:06:02.079
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying he was the best player at that time

119
00:06:02.240 --> 00:06:02.879
<v Speaker 2>in that moment.

120
00:06:03.160 --> 00:06:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I just don't think that that's actually true. Like he

121
00:06:06.240 --> 00:06:10.439
<v Speaker 3>had one of the most So win probability is the

122
00:06:10.560 --> 00:06:12.839
<v Speaker 3>It's the only thing that matters championship. Probability is the

123
00:06:12.879 --> 00:06:13.519
<v Speaker 3>only thing that matters.

124
00:06:13.839 --> 00:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Winning is all that matters, baby and right.

125
00:06:16.240 --> 00:06:18.560
<v Speaker 3>But the way you win is with good players, Like

126
00:06:18.600 --> 00:06:21.279
<v Speaker 3>that's That's what I'm saying, is that the definition of

127
00:06:21.279 --> 00:06:23.959
<v Speaker 3>of what the best team is is having the best players,

128
00:06:23.959 --> 00:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>not who won the last game. And I think that

129
00:06:26.759 --> 00:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>the tournament is fun because of that uncertainty. That's a feature,

130
00:06:30.759 --> 00:06:33.600
<v Speaker 3>not a bug. But it's not the same thing as

131
00:06:33.639 --> 00:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>they're the best team.

132
00:06:34.680 --> 00:06:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Probability and reality are not the same things, right. I understand,

133
00:06:38.639 --> 00:06:41.720
<v Speaker 2>you make the best calculated measurements, this will give you

134
00:06:41.800 --> 00:06:43.959
<v Speaker 2>the best odds. But when it comes down to it,

135
00:06:43.959 --> 00:06:45.759
<v Speaker 2>it's just who is the best at that time, in

136
00:06:45.800 --> 00:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>that moment, and the O five White Sox with the

137
00:06:47.800 --> 00:06:50.160
<v Speaker 2>best team in the regular season and the postseason, and

138
00:06:50.199 --> 00:06:53.199
<v Speaker 2>your cute little Mariners weren't that. So I'm sticking to

139
00:06:53.279 --> 00:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>my guns here, best team of our lifetime, just single season.

140
00:06:57.120 --> 00:07:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Your your favorite team? That fine?

141
00:07:00.680 --> 00:07:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it was lightning in a bottle, but I will

142
00:07:03.120 --> 00:07:05.519
<v Speaker 2>argue that for it for days. But that's not They're

143
00:07:05.560 --> 00:07:07.560
<v Speaker 2>not my team anymore, man, They're not. I got the

144
00:07:07.800 --> 00:07:09.000
<v Speaker 2>five banner back there though.

145
00:07:09.720 --> 00:07:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but they they were, And that was like a

146
00:07:12.879 --> 00:07:16.079
<v Speaker 3>formative thing for you. I get why that has stuck

147
00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:17.040
<v Speaker 3>in there your bible.

148
00:07:17.199 --> 00:07:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Never see it. We'll never see a starting pitching staff

149
00:07:20.519 --> 00:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>like that ever. Again.

150
00:07:22.079 --> 00:07:24.120
<v Speaker 3>That mid have one good season?

151
00:07:24.240 --> 00:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Whatever do? They destroyed it? But AnyWho, that guy, did

152
00:07:28.560 --> 00:07:31.279
<v Speaker 2>you do your homework this week? Did you have any epiphanies,

153
00:07:31.279 --> 00:07:34.240
<v Speaker 2>come to any realizations, feel a little apologetic for your

154
00:07:34.279 --> 00:07:37.399
<v Speaker 2>stance last week at all? A little bit? Now you ap?

155
00:07:37.800 --> 00:07:38.959
<v Speaker 2>Did you watch it?

156
00:07:39.240 --> 00:07:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a huge nothing burger.

157
00:07:41.560 --> 00:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god.

158
00:07:42.800 --> 00:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>We're now recognized mister Elizondo for his opening statement.

159
00:07:45.879 --> 00:07:48.199
<v Speaker 5>It is my honor and privilege to testify before you

160
00:07:48.240 --> 00:07:51.720
<v Speaker 5>on the issue of Unidentified Anomalous phenomenon formerly known as UFOs.

161
00:07:51.839 --> 00:07:56.319
<v Speaker 5>Let me be clear, u AP are real advanced technologies

162
00:07:56.399 --> 00:07:58.759
<v Speaker 5>not made by our government or any other government are

163
00:07:58.800 --> 00:08:02.639
<v Speaker 5>monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe. Furthermore, the US

164
00:08:02.680 --> 00:08:05.639
<v Speaker 5>is in possession of UAP technologies, as are some of

165
00:08:05.680 --> 00:08:07.839
<v Speaker 5>our adversaries. Although much of my government work on the

166
00:08:07.920 --> 00:08:11.879
<v Speaker 5>UAP subject still remains classified. Excessive secrecy has led to

167
00:08:11.959 --> 00:08:16.800
<v Speaker 5>grave misdeeds against loyal civil servants, military personnel, and the public,

168
00:08:17.360 --> 00:08:19.680
<v Speaker 5>all to hide the fact that we are not alone

169
00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:21.040
<v Speaker 5>in the cosmos.

170
00:08:21.399 --> 00:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>You'll come around eventually. I'll save you a seat on

171
00:08:24.600 --> 00:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>the ship. Don't worry, my friend, I got you. But

172
00:08:27.800 --> 00:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>what the hell are we doing? We're talking about We're

173
00:08:30.120 --> 00:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>doing the B side show here. We're talking about zero

174
00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:36.399
<v Speaker 2>one that maybe not created yet on fan tracks prospects.

175
00:08:36.480 --> 00:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>This will be our fifth out of six installments, going

176
00:08:39.360 --> 00:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>division by division, The rook and I each pick a

177
00:08:42.039 --> 00:08:44.759
<v Speaker 2>hitter and a pitcher from each organization that we think

178
00:08:45.039 --> 00:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>might pop up a little bit this year or gain

179
00:08:47.080 --> 00:08:50.879
<v Speaker 2>some more dynasty utility. Sometimes we come to the same player,

180
00:08:50.879 --> 00:08:52.720
<v Speaker 2>and that's always kind of fun and neat. But I

181
00:08:52.720 --> 00:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>think that's surmises it all right, right, Matt. Indeed it

182
00:08:55.399 --> 00:08:58.480
<v Speaker 2>is so the Al East talk about it's like the

183
00:08:58.759 --> 00:09:01.879
<v Speaker 2>prettiest of pretty boys visions, huh, spending lots of money,

184
00:09:02.000 --> 00:09:06.559
<v Speaker 2>lots of fans wastemarter fans out here. But I thought

185
00:09:06.559 --> 00:09:08.559
<v Speaker 2>this was a fun one, Matt. I think there's some

186
00:09:08.639 --> 00:09:10.919
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite maybe my top arm in my top

187
00:09:10.960 --> 00:09:13.679
<v Speaker 2>bat out of all the b sides, reside in this division.

188
00:09:13.720 --> 00:09:15.480
<v Speaker 3>But I could see it. There's some good ones.

189
00:09:15.600 --> 00:09:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Who do you want to start with? What team you

190
00:09:16.919 --> 00:09:17.440
<v Speaker 2>want to start with?

191
00:09:17.720 --> 00:09:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Start with the what I think is the least interesting,

192
00:09:22.759 --> 00:09:24.279
<v Speaker 3>which is which is Tampa for me?

193
00:09:24.480 --> 00:09:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I was going to say Red Sox for that, but.

194
00:09:26.559 --> 00:09:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Alright, second least is a boss and for sure, but.

195
00:09:31.120 --> 00:09:34.559
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay Ray's bats. Who you got? Who'd you land on?

196
00:09:34.919 --> 00:09:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know it's worth giving us some props for

197
00:09:38.759 --> 00:09:41.320
<v Speaker 3>our Tampa picks last year, because I thought those were

198
00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:45.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty good. Chandler Simpson turned in an awesome year and

199
00:09:45.960 --> 00:09:49.200
<v Speaker 3>stole one hundred some bases, struck out less than ten

200
00:09:49.240 --> 00:09:51.960
<v Speaker 3>percent of the time, walked in an average amount of time,

201
00:09:52.120 --> 00:09:54.360
<v Speaker 3>put up a one forty WRC plus and I think

202
00:09:54.399 --> 00:09:56.919
<v Speaker 3>now is starting to get some love, although I think

203
00:09:57.039 --> 00:09:59.320
<v Speaker 3>he's still under owned. When I looked it was like

204
00:09:59.639 --> 00:10:02.759
<v Speaker 3>in your points leagues that penalize K's and especially in

205
00:10:02.799 --> 00:10:05.320
<v Speaker 3>row leagues like as a as a speed option, he

206
00:10:05.399 --> 00:10:07.840
<v Speaker 3>seems under own still. But that was a good one.

207
00:10:07.960 --> 00:10:10.879
<v Speaker 3>I was really hoping that because the Rays are such

208
00:10:10.919 --> 00:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>a deep smart system, that they were going to have

209
00:10:13.399 --> 00:10:15.159
<v Speaker 3>some of these underappreciated guys.

210
00:10:15.279 --> 00:10:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Well.

211
00:10:15.639 --> 00:10:17.519
<v Speaker 3>One thing they did is they acquired a bunch of

212
00:10:17.559 --> 00:10:19.919
<v Speaker 3>guys that we've talked about from other systems that we

213
00:10:19.960 --> 00:10:23.639
<v Speaker 3>thought were pretty interesting, and Matt Korvath, Matthew Etzel. I

214
00:10:23.679 --> 00:10:25.759
<v Speaker 3>don't know how many other guys that they got, but

215
00:10:25.879 --> 00:10:28.080
<v Speaker 3>quite a few, but all of them have a little

216
00:10:28.080 --> 00:10:30.879
<v Speaker 3>bit of popularity, whether because like it's that the old

217
00:10:30.960 --> 00:10:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Sam Miller tweet, I love this trade for the Rays.

218
00:10:33.480 --> 00:10:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Who they get, who they give up, and people just

219
00:10:35.480 --> 00:10:37.639
<v Speaker 3>assume that the Rays know what they're doing. But I

220
00:10:37.720 --> 00:10:41.000
<v Speaker 3>was really struggling to find some good options at those

221
00:10:41.120 --> 00:10:44.279
<v Speaker 3>zero and one percent range, especially on the back side.

222
00:10:44.360 --> 00:10:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

223
00:10:44.879 --> 00:10:47.399
<v Speaker 3>I looked at a couple of different dudes that were

224
00:10:47.440 --> 00:10:50.200
<v Speaker 3>on the younger side, but couldn't wrap my head around

225
00:10:50.480 --> 00:10:55.080
<v Speaker 3>their foremance like guys that were decent Narcisso Polanco was

226
00:10:55.320 --> 00:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>a guy that I looked at as like, he's kind

227
00:10:57.240 --> 00:11:01.000
<v Speaker 3>of young, he's been okay, has some traits that I like,

228
00:11:01.200 --> 00:11:03.639
<v Speaker 3>but he was still kind of average as a nineteen

229
00:11:03.679 --> 00:11:06.279
<v Speaker 3>year old and in low A, And I don't even

230
00:11:06.320 --> 00:11:08.799
<v Speaker 3>feel that much better about the guy that I landed on,

231
00:11:09.519 --> 00:11:13.279
<v Speaker 3>which is on hell Mateo Mateo, like super similar in

232
00:11:13.320 --> 00:11:17.200
<v Speaker 3>lots of ways. His line is almost identical to Polanco's.

233
00:11:17.600 --> 00:11:21.080
<v Speaker 3>He went to twenty four three, twenty three, three forty four,

234
00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:23.480
<v Speaker 3>and he spent the whole year at a ball, so

235
00:11:23.559 --> 00:11:25.440
<v Speaker 3>that was all low A as a nineteen year old.

236
00:11:25.519 --> 00:11:27.639
<v Speaker 3>He also struck out twenty five percent of the time,

237
00:11:27.679 --> 00:11:30.320
<v Speaker 3>which is like kind of high, especially for what I

238
00:11:30.440 --> 00:11:32.559
<v Speaker 3>like to look for. He did walk a decent amount,

239
00:11:32.679 --> 00:11:35.600
<v Speaker 3>swiped twenty six bags, popped six homers, but he also

240
00:11:35.639 --> 00:11:37.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't hit a homer for like the last two months

241
00:11:37.840 --> 00:11:41.000
<v Speaker 3>of the season, which was a little concerning about is

242
00:11:41.080 --> 00:11:43.960
<v Speaker 3>there something wrong here? Is the power just really not there?

243
00:11:44.080 --> 00:11:45.960
<v Speaker 3>When I watched him earlier in the year, I was like, Oh,

244
00:11:46.000 --> 00:11:48.080
<v Speaker 3>this is sort of an interesting teenager. Maybe he's going

245
00:11:48.159 --> 00:11:50.039
<v Speaker 3>to get to ten homers. And there's a little more

246
00:11:50.039 --> 00:11:52.120
<v Speaker 3>projection left on the bone and it might just take

247
00:11:52.120 --> 00:11:54.200
<v Speaker 3>a little time for him to get there. You know,

248
00:11:54.240 --> 00:11:56.879
<v Speaker 3>he's six ' one, reasonably well built. I like some

249
00:11:57.039 --> 00:11:59.360
<v Speaker 3>things about his swing, although it seemed like he got

250
00:11:59.399 --> 00:12:02.559
<v Speaker 3>eaten up sliders away and so that wasn't that was

251
00:12:02.600 --> 00:12:05.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit discouraging to me. It's more that he's

252
00:12:05.759 --> 00:12:10.039
<v Speaker 3>young enough, has shown enough potential that I'm like, and

253
00:12:10.120 --> 00:12:11.919
<v Speaker 3>I didn't see anybody else that I wanted to bet

254
00:12:12.000 --> 00:12:15.519
<v Speaker 3>on more. So I'm going with Matteo here. Don't feel

255
00:12:15.519 --> 00:12:19.080
<v Speaker 3>great about it. I mean, he's again young, has some talent,

256
00:12:19.320 --> 00:12:21.480
<v Speaker 3>and we'll see what he does at Bowling Green next year.

257
00:12:21.559 --> 00:12:26.200
<v Speaker 3>But there's definitely some flaws here and it wasn't super exciting.

258
00:12:26.279 --> 00:12:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Olivia going like a little of my default here, just

259
00:12:29.360 --> 00:12:32.759
<v Speaker 2>like pick a teenager and a ball. Yeah, I don't know.

260
00:12:33.080 --> 00:12:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I don't think I had that before, have you.

261
00:12:36.720 --> 00:12:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really And I looked at a couple of

262
00:12:38.480 --> 00:12:41.679
<v Speaker 3>their older guys to see, you know, like Seymour was

263
00:12:41.759 --> 00:12:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Bob Seymour was one that I think was like at

264
00:12:43.600 --> 00:12:46.159
<v Speaker 3>one percent, and I thought maybe he was going to

265
00:12:46.200 --> 00:12:50.039
<v Speaker 3>get looked at in the rule five. But I was like,

266
00:12:50.200 --> 00:12:53.240
<v Speaker 3>no the for him, at least the upside didn't seem there.

267
00:12:53.320 --> 00:12:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Like he seemed like a blow average bat, but like

268
00:12:56.200 --> 00:12:59.039
<v Speaker 3>high probability and as a corner guy, probably not going

269
00:12:59.120 --> 00:12:59.440
<v Speaker 3>to play.

270
00:12:59.519 --> 00:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So I think Mateo and Polanco, those were two of

271
00:13:03.600 --> 00:13:06.679
<v Speaker 2>my last three finalists here, so we weren't too far off.

272
00:13:06.720 --> 00:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>But I ended up going the first year player route.

273
00:13:09.399 --> 00:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, we're not We're talking in pretty small sample size.

274
00:13:12.320 --> 00:13:15.000
<v Speaker 2>This is not a player that I was familiar with

275
00:13:15.080 --> 00:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>as an amateur, but I'm going I'm not really totally

276
00:13:19.200 --> 00:13:22.639
<v Speaker 2>sure how to say his name, Matt, but Connor huge

277
00:13:22.759 --> 00:13:28.279
<v Speaker 2>sack huge, huge, which really cool, but Connor huge, huge, sick,

278
00:13:28.480 --> 00:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I think, because how I heard them say it, But

279
00:13:30.279 --> 00:13:35.399
<v Speaker 2>it's h u J sak all right, he's an outfielder.

280
00:13:35.600 --> 00:13:36.720
<v Speaker 2>How would you say that name?

281
00:13:37.039 --> 00:13:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you sick?

282
00:13:38.559 --> 00:13:40.759
<v Speaker 2>I think. He started off his college career at VCU

283
00:13:40.840 --> 00:13:43.879
<v Speaker 2>and then transferred to Mississippi State the last two seasons.

284
00:13:44.039 --> 00:13:46.960
<v Speaker 2>The Rays popped him in the thirteenth round four one

285
00:13:47.039 --> 00:13:49.559
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty K listened at six ' two, good

286
00:13:49.559 --> 00:13:52.480
<v Speaker 2>sized fella, and shared the video with you there. I

287
00:13:52.519 --> 00:13:54.879
<v Speaker 2>was just kind of impressed with his ability to he

288
00:13:54.960 --> 00:13:56.919
<v Speaker 2>hit some home runs to all fields. I like to

289
00:13:56.960 --> 00:13:59.320
<v Speaker 2>look at the swings of all of those just twenty

290
00:13:59.360 --> 00:14:02.519
<v Speaker 2>one games played appearances, he hit four home runs, he

291
00:14:02.559 --> 00:14:06.240
<v Speaker 2>swiped five bags. I don't really know if stolen bases

292
00:14:06.360 --> 00:14:08.320
<v Speaker 2>are gonna be a big part of his future. Of

293
00:14:08.399 --> 00:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>this is just you know, a little wiser baseball player

294
00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:14.000
<v Speaker 2>taking advantage of some A ball guys didn't get caught.

295
00:14:14.159 --> 00:14:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Walked seven percent of the time, struck out twenty four

296
00:14:16.360 --> 00:14:18.960
<v Speaker 2>percent of the time. But you know, decent little debut

297
00:14:19.000 --> 00:14:22.279
<v Speaker 2>here to seventy seven three, twenty six, five, eighteen. I

298
00:14:22.360 --> 00:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>know I caught. I'm not even maybe the BA guys.

299
00:14:25.879 --> 00:14:27.919
<v Speaker 2>Last couple of weeks I've been listening to their draft

300
00:14:27.960 --> 00:14:31.000
<v Speaker 2>class review podcasts, and I think they noted that there

301
00:14:31.120 --> 00:14:33.519
<v Speaker 2>was a couple of evs by him over one hundred

302
00:14:33.519 --> 00:14:35.919
<v Speaker 2>and ten during his pro debut. So yeah, I don't know,

303
00:14:36.039 --> 00:14:37.639
<v Speaker 2>just kind of caught a guy. But I kind of

304
00:14:37.720 --> 00:14:40.759
<v Speaker 2>liked the look of his fairly, you know, simple looking

305
00:14:40.840 --> 00:14:42.559
<v Speaker 2>stroke up there. He's got a little bit of a

306
00:14:42.799 --> 00:14:44.039
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, how do you say it, a little

307
00:14:44.080 --> 00:14:46.600
<v Speaker 2>bit of like a rounded out step, but it's not

308
00:14:46.679 --> 00:14:48.679
<v Speaker 2>real big and everything like that. Yeah, I don't know,

309
00:14:48.679 --> 00:14:50.879
<v Speaker 2>and now his home runs. What I say he popped

310
00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:52.720
<v Speaker 2>four of them, three of them were in one game.

311
00:14:53.919 --> 00:14:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

312
00:14:54.559 --> 00:14:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so you know it was just a concentrated

313
00:14:57.159 --> 00:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>couple of days of the home run output. But yeah,

314
00:14:59.360 --> 00:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know a guy who was playing some center

315
00:15:01.000 --> 00:15:03.320
<v Speaker 2>field as well. That guy maybe doesn't really look like

316
00:15:03.360 --> 00:15:06.679
<v Speaker 2>a center fielder if you're just being superficial about it.

317
00:15:06.720 --> 00:15:12.240
<v Speaker 2>But Connor huge Sack, huge sick, I mean eighty grade

318
00:15:12.320 --> 00:15:14.720
<v Speaker 2>name and I'll throw them out there as my rais

319
00:15:14.799 --> 00:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>B side this year? Solid solid?

320
00:15:16.919 --> 00:15:18.879
<v Speaker 3>Did he end up only a little bit? I caught

321
00:15:18.919 --> 00:15:20.720
<v Speaker 3>a couple of his games late in the season, but

322
00:15:21.320 --> 00:15:24.080
<v Speaker 3>I can't say he stood out when I was just

323
00:15:24.120 --> 00:15:25.000
<v Speaker 3>scrolling through guys.

324
00:15:25.159 --> 00:15:26.840
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know if I mentioned he's right handed,

325
00:15:26.879 --> 00:15:29.679
<v Speaker 2>I'll share videos. I got videos of his home runs

326
00:15:29.679 --> 00:15:32.559
<v Speaker 2>here on Twitter at Pitching Specs. Check that out if

327
00:15:32.600 --> 00:15:34.039
<v Speaker 2>you if you want to take a look at what

328
00:15:34.039 --> 00:15:35.159
<v Speaker 2>we're trying to talk about.

329
00:15:34.919 --> 00:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Here, Yeah, who did you go for for your arm?

330
00:15:37.480 --> 00:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm kind of into my arm here quite a bit.

331
00:15:40.639 --> 00:15:43.080
<v Speaker 2>But let's let's look at their system here real quick, Matt.

332
00:15:43.080 --> 00:15:44.919
<v Speaker 2>The pretty boys. There's kind of a lot of pretty

333
00:15:44.919 --> 00:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>boys in this system. Yell at me if somebody got

334
00:15:47.320 --> 00:15:51.440
<v Speaker 2>traded here recently. But Dylan LESCo thirty one percent, Santiago

335
00:15:51.519 --> 00:15:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Suarez fourteen percent, Carut twelve percent, Ty Johnson ten, Gary

336
00:15:55.720 --> 00:15:57.759
<v Speaker 2>Gil hill Am I picked from last year, ten, pul

337
00:15:57.759 --> 00:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Wilcox ten, Ian Seymour ten, Jackson Baumeister, ten, Brody Hopkins eight.

338
00:16:02.720 --> 00:16:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Nick Bitsko is he even like a professional baseball player anymore?

339
00:16:06.879 --> 00:16:07.519
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea.

340
00:16:07.679 --> 00:16:08.399
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't tell you.

341
00:16:08.600 --> 00:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, seven percent, tre j Goss three percent, Trevor Martin,

342
00:16:12.480 --> 00:16:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Joe Rock three percent, Trevor Harrison two percent, and I

343
00:16:15.759 --> 00:16:18.000
<v Speaker 2>think Owen Wild I don't know. I have two to

344
00:16:18.039 --> 00:16:19.759
<v Speaker 2>one percent here, so I don't know. Oh, he was

345
00:16:19.799 --> 00:16:22.279
<v Speaker 2>two percent of the beginning of September, one percent at the end.

346
00:16:23.000 --> 00:16:25.519
<v Speaker 2>But you know that's a that's a healthy slew of somewhat,

347
00:16:25.600 --> 00:16:28.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, having some dynasty love out there. But I'm

348
00:16:28.440 --> 00:16:31.639
<v Speaker 2>going with another teenager, Matt eighteen year old and a

349
00:16:31.799 --> 00:16:34.720
<v Speaker 2>ball Jose Orbina. Are you familiar.

350
00:16:34.879 --> 00:16:35.879
<v Speaker 3>I saw a little bit of him.

351
00:16:35.919 --> 00:16:38.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I had to hit up Clegg today.

352
00:16:38.960 --> 00:16:41.639
<v Speaker 3>Little guy right like smaller, smaller frame.

353
00:16:41.919 --> 00:16:44.720
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no. He was one percent roster, And

354
00:16:44.759 --> 00:16:46.480
<v Speaker 2>so there's some folks on there. I think he was

355
00:16:46.519 --> 00:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty ninth on Pipeline's list the last time I checked.

356
00:16:49.600 --> 00:16:52.840
<v Speaker 2>He was eighteen point eight years old last his last start,

357
00:16:52.879 --> 00:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>but he's listed at six three. Maybe maybe that's a

358
00:16:56.200 --> 00:16:59.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit generous, but I know that the story is

359
00:16:59.440 --> 00:17:02.200
<v Speaker 2>with her being that he You know, they signed what

360
00:17:02.360 --> 00:17:05.599
<v Speaker 2>he signed in twenty twenty three, so not that long ago.

361
00:17:05.759 --> 00:17:08.079
<v Speaker 2>After he signed, there was like a big growth spurt here,

362
00:17:08.200 --> 00:17:11.440
<v Speaker 2>so got much taller and the velocity is like really

363
00:17:11.480 --> 00:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>ticked up. Venezuelan. He was signed for just two hundred

364
00:17:14.359 --> 00:17:17.839
<v Speaker 2>and ten K. Last year, he pitched forty eight complex

365
00:17:17.880 --> 00:17:22.400
<v Speaker 2>innings and then just seventeen a ball innings, four appearances,

366
00:17:22.440 --> 00:17:25.640
<v Speaker 2>four starts eer A five twenty nine but a whip

367
00:17:25.680 --> 00:17:28.680
<v Speaker 2>of one point zero six in a ball here four

368
00:17:28.680 --> 00:17:31.519
<v Speaker 2>two two x fip struck out just eighteen point two percent,

369
00:17:31.640 --> 00:17:34.480
<v Speaker 2>walked six point one percent, which was nice because in

370
00:17:34.519 --> 00:17:37.319
<v Speaker 2>a complex it was at twelve percent. Now, granted, again

371
00:17:37.359 --> 00:17:39.880
<v Speaker 2>this is very small sample size, but I did not

372
00:17:40.079 --> 00:17:44.160
<v Speaker 2>mind his execution. Now granted, I think his attack was

373
00:17:44.200 --> 00:17:47.839
<v Speaker 2>fairly simple, and my watches it was a good fastball

374
00:17:47.920 --> 00:17:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and slider. I think he was just kind of generically

375
00:17:50.880 --> 00:17:53.279
<v Speaker 2>throwing up in the zone for strikes, but doing that

376
00:17:53.319 --> 00:17:55.960
<v Speaker 2>consistently and doing that well. I kind of wonder I'd

377
00:17:56.039 --> 00:17:58.160
<v Speaker 2>love to hear about his slider shape a little bit

378
00:17:58.160 --> 00:18:00.440
<v Speaker 2>because I wonder if it's one that kind of gets

379
00:18:00.440 --> 00:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>some ride, like erkulanis that we were like kind of

380
00:18:03.000 --> 00:18:06.519
<v Speaker 2>talking about. Yeah, but just playing his ninety five ninety

381
00:18:06.519 --> 00:18:09.400
<v Speaker 2>six mile per hour fastball within that firm mid mid

382
00:18:09.480 --> 00:18:12.119
<v Speaker 2>eighties slider just up in the zone was just really

383
00:18:12.160 --> 00:18:15.359
<v Speaker 2>kind of dominating these guys. He did throw in what

384
00:18:15.440 --> 00:18:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I thought was a pretty good looking curveball sometimes and

385
00:18:18.039 --> 00:18:19.799
<v Speaker 2>then there was a change up. I think the change

386
00:18:19.880 --> 00:18:22.200
<v Speaker 2>up is very much a developmental pitch at this time.

387
00:18:22.319 --> 00:18:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I think the ones that I caught there was like

388
00:18:23.920 --> 00:18:26.079
<v Speaker 2>they were executed so poorly. You couldn't even like look

389
00:18:26.079 --> 00:18:27.920
<v Speaker 2>at this shape, like it was just like hitting the

390
00:18:27.920 --> 00:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>dirt or something, you know what I mean. So I

391
00:18:29.519 --> 00:18:32.559
<v Speaker 2>think that's very much a work in progress. Yeah, yeah, four,

392
00:18:32.640 --> 00:18:36.119
<v Speaker 2>start saying at a ball. He went four and three of

393
00:18:36.160 --> 00:18:38.200
<v Speaker 2>them five and one. You know, it didn't get really

394
00:18:38.319 --> 00:18:40.559
<v Speaker 2>hit up too much. There was one one out he

395
00:18:40.640 --> 00:18:42.880
<v Speaker 2>gave up five to turns, but he earned. But he

396
00:18:42.920 --> 00:18:46.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't walk more than two in an outing, struck out three, two, two,

397
00:18:46.160 --> 00:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>and five. And now he did give up some home runs.

398
00:18:48.480 --> 00:18:50.119
<v Speaker 2>I know a couple of those were just and he

399
00:18:50.160 --> 00:18:51.839
<v Speaker 2>was just trying to get some fastballs up in the

400
00:18:51.880 --> 00:18:53.599
<v Speaker 2>zone and he just got him over the meat of

401
00:18:53.599 --> 00:18:56.640
<v Speaker 2>the plate. But you can see the operation, like the

402
00:18:56.759 --> 00:19:00.000
<v Speaker 2>video that I shared, it's, I mean, it's fairly easy

403
00:19:00.480 --> 00:19:01.519
<v Speaker 2>ninety six I think.

404
00:19:01.920 --> 00:19:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Is it a good ninety six though? I mean like

405
00:19:04.359 --> 00:19:08.440
<v Speaker 3>he's in low A against a bunch of bitty teenagers

406
00:19:08.839 --> 00:19:12.119
<v Speaker 3>and he pushed up twenty percent of guys, Like, what's

407
00:19:12.160 --> 00:19:13.000
<v Speaker 3>what's up with that?

408
00:19:13.200 --> 00:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I think in part was the sequence of pitching pitches, like,

409
00:19:17.359 --> 00:19:19.519
<v Speaker 2>oh there was a hit a ble ninety six over

410
00:19:19.519 --> 00:19:21.119
<v Speaker 2>the heart of the plate here and they got some

411
00:19:21.200 --> 00:19:23.960
<v Speaker 2>wood on it. You know, it's very much just it's

412
00:19:24.000 --> 00:19:27.079
<v Speaker 2>this is very much eyeballs to me, not really so much.

413
00:19:27.240 --> 00:19:31.599
<v Speaker 2>Numbers is very minuscule sample size, right, but what was

414
00:19:31.599 --> 00:19:35.039
<v Speaker 2>his k rate in the complex? Twenty one point seven percent,

415
00:19:35.079 --> 00:19:37.680
<v Speaker 2>so not much higher. But I mean, if you wanted to,

416
00:19:37.880 --> 00:19:41.200
<v Speaker 2>if we rewind a year ago, like watching Gary gil

417
00:19:41.319 --> 00:19:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Hill like way more excited about her being and stuff

418
00:19:44.799 --> 00:19:47.160
<v Speaker 2>than Gary gil Hill's at that time. And we know

419
00:19:47.400 --> 00:19:50.039
<v Speaker 2>we know that the rays will sharpen a you know,

420
00:19:50.079 --> 00:19:51.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of times I think they like to focus

421
00:19:51.680 --> 00:19:54.559
<v Speaker 2>on on one weapon there, guys, and really get the

422
00:19:54.599 --> 00:19:56.240
<v Speaker 2>most out of that one pitch that they can. But

423
00:19:56.400 --> 00:19:58.559
<v Speaker 2>I don't know an eighteen year old ball of clay

424
00:19:58.599 --> 00:20:01.720
<v Speaker 2>here in this system that I I think could very

425
00:20:01.759 --> 00:20:04.880
<v Speaker 2>well pop up this year. Jose Rbina, It's.

426
00:20:04.759 --> 00:20:07.000
<v Speaker 3>An interesting one, you know. Like I said, I think

427
00:20:07.000 --> 00:20:10.079
<v Speaker 3>there's some he's got some potential in there. I'm curious

428
00:20:10.119 --> 00:20:14.720
<v Speaker 3>why the results haven't been there. I'm going again more

429
00:20:14.759 --> 00:20:20.000
<v Speaker 3>towards my pensiont I'm going older and to the near,

430
00:20:20.039 --> 00:20:23.440
<v Speaker 3>to the big arms here, I'm picking Logan Workman. I

431
00:20:23.480 --> 00:20:26.440
<v Speaker 3>think I might have taken Wild if i'd known he

432
00:20:26.640 --> 00:20:28.519
<v Speaker 3>was at one percent, because when I looked, I thought

433
00:20:28.519 --> 00:20:31.039
<v Speaker 3>it was like three or four. So I might slightly

434
00:20:31.079 --> 00:20:35.720
<v Speaker 3>prefer Wild in a vacuum, just a little bit younger,

435
00:20:35.880 --> 00:20:38.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think might have a little touch, more touch,

436
00:20:39.000 --> 00:20:41.759
<v Speaker 3>more upside in the long run. I thought he was

437
00:20:41.839 --> 00:20:43.759
<v Speaker 3>really good, and we talked a bit about him coming

438
00:20:43.759 --> 00:20:45.799
<v Speaker 3>out of the draft last year, so don't need to

439
00:20:46.039 --> 00:20:49.640
<v Speaker 3>belabor that. But among the really interesting arms, you listed

440
00:20:49.680 --> 00:20:52.119
<v Speaker 3>off a bunch of them, you know, Ian Seymour had

441
00:20:52.160 --> 00:20:54.960
<v Speaker 3>a phenomenal triple A run at that ended in Triple

442
00:20:55.000 --> 00:20:58.880
<v Speaker 3>A this year. Yaniel Corrett, he was awesome too. Oh

443
00:20:58.960 --> 00:21:03.079
<v Speaker 3>and Wild. I thought was a good get from the

444
00:21:03.119 --> 00:21:06.960
<v Speaker 3>O's this year. Hi Johnson, Brody Hopkins also in trade.

445
00:21:07.000 --> 00:21:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Like they had a lot of good pitchers that had

446
00:21:09.720 --> 00:21:13.279
<v Speaker 3>really good seasons too, but Workmen stood out for me

447
00:21:13.759 --> 00:21:16.599
<v Speaker 3>as in this B side range, I think he was

448
00:21:16.640 --> 00:21:19.440
<v Speaker 3>either zero or one percent when I looked. He's spent

449
00:21:19.480 --> 00:21:20.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the year in TRIPA, so we got

450
00:21:20.920 --> 00:21:22.640
<v Speaker 3>to see a lot of data on him, and so

451
00:21:22.720 --> 00:21:24.880
<v Speaker 3>it was really fun digging into what he had there.

452
00:21:25.160 --> 00:21:28.200
<v Speaker 3>His fastballs ninety to ninety five, but it actually plays

453
00:21:28.279 --> 00:21:30.039
<v Speaker 3>better than that, I think, And I actually think he

454
00:21:30.079 --> 00:21:32.880
<v Speaker 3>got a little unlucky in his results this year based

455
00:21:32.920 --> 00:21:36.559
<v Speaker 3>on some of the pitch shapes and the amount of

456
00:21:36.559 --> 00:21:39.640
<v Speaker 3>swinging strikes that he was getting. He really commanded that

457
00:21:39.759 --> 00:21:42.440
<v Speaker 3>fastball well and so even though he's like averaging it

458
00:21:42.480 --> 00:21:44.799
<v Speaker 3>in ninety two to ninety three, I think that's playing

459
00:21:45.119 --> 00:21:48.480
<v Speaker 3>up pretty consistently. He's also got a change up that

460
00:21:48.519 --> 00:21:50.839
<v Speaker 3>he goes to and throws quite a lot, and I

461
00:21:50.880 --> 00:21:53.200
<v Speaker 3>thought was quite a good pitch. I think he liked

462
00:21:53.240 --> 00:21:55.440
<v Speaker 3>it his second most after his fastball, and then he

463
00:21:55.480 --> 00:21:58.119
<v Speaker 3>also was a slider and cutter, but those blended a

464
00:21:58.119 --> 00:22:00.279
<v Speaker 3>little bit. For me, I thought they could get a

465
00:22:00.319 --> 00:22:02.839
<v Speaker 3>little bit close to each other, and with you know,

466
00:22:02.920 --> 00:22:05.519
<v Speaker 3>a little bit sharper execution, he might separate those a

467
00:22:05.519 --> 00:22:08.640
<v Speaker 3>bit more. Especially on the slider. I thought that sometimes

468
00:22:08.640 --> 00:22:11.039
<v Speaker 3>he would lose the action, so rather than getting that

469
00:22:11.079 --> 00:22:14.119
<v Speaker 3>good sharp sweeping bite that it would float, he would

470
00:22:14.160 --> 00:22:16.559
<v Speaker 3>kind of get under it, and I think he let

471
00:22:16.599 --> 00:22:20.039
<v Speaker 3>that get hit sometimes. Did also like watching him start

472
00:22:20.079 --> 00:22:22.880
<v Speaker 3>to start, especially in Tirpla with the stack cast data,

473
00:22:23.039 --> 00:22:25.759
<v Speaker 3>you could see him adjust his approach and his pitch

474
00:22:25.839 --> 00:22:28.279
<v Speaker 3>mix from start to start. Whereas a lot of guys

475
00:22:28.319 --> 00:22:30.160
<v Speaker 3>you throw them on enough and you're like they're going

476
00:22:30.200 --> 00:22:33.279
<v Speaker 3>to be fifty percent fastballs, twenty five percent sliders, ten

477
00:22:33.319 --> 00:22:36.920
<v Speaker 3>percent curveballs, and ten percent change ups. Workman start to

478
00:22:36.960 --> 00:22:40.319
<v Speaker 3>start he would change how he was attacking hitters and

479
00:22:40.359 --> 00:22:42.680
<v Speaker 3>how he was attacking lineups. He didn't get picked in

480
00:22:42.720 --> 00:22:45.400
<v Speaker 3>the Rule five, and he was eligible this year. I

481
00:22:45.440 --> 00:22:47.559
<v Speaker 3>thought he had an outside chance to and I think

482
00:22:47.559 --> 00:22:51.039
<v Speaker 3>he popped up on ba's Rule five draft prep list

483
00:22:51.119 --> 00:22:53.119
<v Speaker 3>that they thought he might get a look from a

484
00:22:53.119 --> 00:22:55.720
<v Speaker 3>team that wanted a depth starter. I think that there's

485
00:22:55.759 --> 00:22:58.279
<v Speaker 3>not a ton of upside here. He looks like a

486
00:22:58.319 --> 00:23:00.839
<v Speaker 3>high probability back end started to me. But it looks

487
00:23:00.920 --> 00:23:03.079
<v Speaker 3>good enough that I think he's going to get that shot.

488
00:23:03.119 --> 00:23:05.839
<v Speaker 3>And whether that ends up being with Tampa or he

489
00:23:06.000 --> 00:23:09.720
<v Speaker 3>ends up somewhere else in trade or in free agency,

490
00:23:09.799 --> 00:23:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure. But Logan Workman for me, was my

491
00:23:12.319 --> 00:23:14.839
<v Speaker 3>favorite of the one percent arms here, and I do

492
00:23:14.880 --> 00:23:17.799
<v Speaker 3>think there's a lot to like about his pitch mix

493
00:23:17.880 --> 00:23:18.720
<v Speaker 3>and his approach.

494
00:23:18.880 --> 00:23:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was kind of surprised to see that he

495
00:23:20.519 --> 00:23:23.400
<v Speaker 2>was zero percent rostered in September, because I know what

496
00:23:23.400 --> 00:23:27.240
<v Speaker 2>would that be the twenty twenty three AFL season he was,

497
00:23:27.359 --> 00:23:30.359
<v Speaker 2>there was some buzz and some talk about Logan Workmen,

498
00:23:30.519 --> 00:23:32.559
<v Speaker 2>so I guess folks just didn't hang on to that

499
00:23:32.640 --> 00:23:34.640
<v Speaker 2>through the year. Yeah, Matt, just one more thing I

500
00:23:34.680 --> 00:23:37.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to say about Urbina, Like, you know, you watch,

501
00:23:37.319 --> 00:23:40.400
<v Speaker 2>like I mentioned last week, starting to think more about Like, Okay,

502
00:23:40.440 --> 00:23:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I watched these young international teenage prospects, right pitching prospects,

503
00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:47.160
<v Speaker 2>and you can kind of watch them side by side

504
00:23:47.200 --> 00:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>with some first round prep arms that could taken and

505
00:23:50.000 --> 00:23:53.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, man, this Urbina's like just seems so much

506
00:23:53.359 --> 00:23:56.079
<v Speaker 2>better to me than some first round prep arms that

507
00:23:56.960 --> 00:23:59.319
<v Speaker 2>have been taken lately, So I don't know for whatever

508
00:23:59.359 --> 00:24:01.160
<v Speaker 2>that's worth. I was just kind of thinking about that.

509
00:24:01.200 --> 00:24:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I was like, man, this guy would probably be like

510
00:24:02.680 --> 00:24:04.759
<v Speaker 2>a first second round pick if that's how it had

511
00:24:04.759 --> 00:24:06.880
<v Speaker 2>to be. But what do I know about that stuff?

512
00:24:08.960 --> 00:24:13.839
<v Speaker 2>All right? The Boston Red Sox, their most popular arms

513
00:24:13.880 --> 00:24:18.680
<v Speaker 2>are Dick Fitz thirteen percent, well, Wickleman Gonzalez just got traded,

514
00:24:18.839 --> 00:24:22.480
<v Speaker 2>so he was at ten percent, where Donnie Manegro ten percent,

515
00:24:22.559 --> 00:24:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Luis Paralis eight percent, David Sanlin also just got traded

516
00:24:26.400 --> 00:24:30.559
<v Speaker 2>six percent, Jetkson Payez three percent, your boy from last year,

517
00:24:30.599 --> 00:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Isaac Coffee three percent, and then Elmer Rodriguez Cruz he

518
00:24:33.759 --> 00:24:37.359
<v Speaker 2>also got traded at two percent. Everybody else was zero

519
00:24:37.519 --> 00:24:40.640
<v Speaker 2>one percent here, And I will admit that my guy

520
00:24:41.039 --> 00:24:44.279
<v Speaker 2>might be number thirty on my thirty B side arms

521
00:24:45.160 --> 00:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I had if I had to line them all up,

522
00:24:47.000 --> 00:24:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I did not come away. I don't know, I'm super

523
00:24:49.000 --> 00:24:51.920
<v Speaker 2>excited about anybody here at this roster percentage. Maybe it

524
00:24:51.920 --> 00:24:54.200
<v Speaker 2>would have been wiser to go with a first year

525
00:24:54.279 --> 00:24:57.359
<v Speaker 2>player draft arm, but they didn't really have many debut

526
00:24:57.519 --> 00:25:00.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't think, and it's always kind of t you

527
00:25:00.319 --> 00:25:03.400
<v Speaker 2>to know what their actual roster percentages are going to

528
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:05.240
<v Speaker 2>be after drafts and stuff.

529
00:25:05.279 --> 00:25:07.720
<v Speaker 3>But I could have could have gone Joey Gartreel based

530
00:25:07.759 --> 00:25:09.960
<v Speaker 3>on my live looks University of Portland guy.

531
00:25:10.160 --> 00:25:13.519
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right. I've just never seen him pitch.

532
00:25:15.480 --> 00:25:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Also, I've also I've also heard good things about Peyton Tully.

533
00:25:19.920 --> 00:25:21.279
<v Speaker 3>His one looks interesting.

534
00:25:21.319 --> 00:25:23.640
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, he's the one who's got like the like

535
00:25:23.839 --> 00:25:27.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty foot extension rights. Yeah, have seven point three feet

536
00:25:27.480 --> 00:25:27.839
<v Speaker 2>or something.

537
00:25:27.920 --> 00:25:32.759
<v Speaker 3>Picked coffee last year because he was super unusual performer.

538
00:25:33.319 --> 00:25:36.640
<v Speaker 3>The stuff is like eighty nine and tops out at

539
00:25:36.640 --> 00:25:39.240
<v Speaker 3>like ninety one. But I still think that that's going

540
00:25:39.319 --> 00:25:42.319
<v Speaker 3>to play because of how weird his arm angle and

541
00:25:42.640 --> 00:25:45.119
<v Speaker 3>approach to the plate is. I do love to start

542
00:25:45.119 --> 00:25:47.000
<v Speaker 3>with the data and what is the data telling us?

543
00:25:47.000 --> 00:25:50.400
<v Speaker 3>And dude punched out thirty percent of batters in double A,

544
00:25:50.599 --> 00:25:53.559
<v Speaker 3>So I still think that he's flummoxing hitters and is

545
00:25:53.599 --> 00:25:55.880
<v Speaker 3>going to keep doing it. But you know, we'll see

546
00:25:55.920 --> 00:25:58.480
<v Speaker 3>how that how that ends up as he climbs the ranks,

547
00:25:58.519 --> 00:26:01.240
<v Speaker 3>and I'm super curious to see how that goes apparently

548
00:26:01.279 --> 00:26:03.920
<v Speaker 3>nobody is buying it, but keeps putting up numbers. So

549
00:26:04.079 --> 00:26:06.640
<v Speaker 3>we'll see. Looked at a couple of other guys that

550
00:26:07.039 --> 00:26:11.559
<v Speaker 3>I think we've talked about before. Hunter Dobbins. He's one

551
00:26:11.559 --> 00:26:13.000
<v Speaker 3>that we looked at last year, and I think some

552
00:26:13.039 --> 00:26:15.440
<v Speaker 3>people still like I'm just not I couldn't ever get

553
00:26:15.480 --> 00:26:17.799
<v Speaker 3>myself that excited about it. It seems he was so

554
00:26:17.880 --> 00:26:21.359
<v Speaker 3>much better this year than he was better, but it

555
00:26:21.480 --> 00:26:25.279
<v Speaker 3>still just looks so back endy to me, like seventh starter.

556
00:26:25.640 --> 00:26:26.519
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that's good enough.

557
00:26:26.640 --> 00:26:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. But do a lot of men look

558
00:26:28.279 --> 00:26:29.000
<v Speaker 2>back indy too?

559
00:26:29.519 --> 00:26:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a lot of pictures too. You know, I was

560
00:26:32.799 --> 00:26:36.000
<v Speaker 3>really excited about the guy that I ended up landing on,

561
00:26:36.279 --> 00:26:39.240
<v Speaker 3>though I'm going with Connolly early. You watch much of

562
00:26:39.240 --> 00:26:39.920
<v Speaker 3>early this year.

563
00:26:40.039 --> 00:26:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I did watch some earlies on my sheet here, but

564
00:26:43.759 --> 00:26:46.279
<v Speaker 2>tell me about him because didn't spark my interest for

565
00:26:46.319 --> 00:26:47.960
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason. But what am I missing?

566
00:26:48.160 --> 00:26:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

567
00:26:48.440 --> 00:26:54.000
<v Speaker 3>So he's another guy that I think the Velocity readings

568
00:26:54.079 --> 00:26:56.519
<v Speaker 3>are are kind of lying to us or tricking us,

569
00:26:56.599 --> 00:26:58.720
<v Speaker 3>or setting us on the wrong course. I don't know

570
00:26:58.720 --> 00:27:01.160
<v Speaker 3>if we talked about this a while ago, and I

571
00:27:01.160 --> 00:27:03.599
<v Speaker 3>can't remember what who who said this?

572
00:27:03.720 --> 00:27:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Either.

573
00:27:04.000 --> 00:27:06.000
<v Speaker 3>So this is already a terrible start to the story.

574
00:27:06.039 --> 00:27:10.039
<v Speaker 3>But somebody said that they think that pitching development would

575
00:27:10.039 --> 00:27:14.359
<v Speaker 3>have been much improved if we didn't get the radar

576
00:27:14.480 --> 00:27:18.519
<v Speaker 3>gun first, right. The radar gun was the first concrete

577
00:27:18.640 --> 00:27:22.359
<v Speaker 3>number that we could attach to pictures in picture evaluation.

578
00:27:22.480 --> 00:27:23.880
<v Speaker 3>You know what. With hitters, it was like, I.

579
00:27:23.960 --> 00:27:26.079
<v Speaker 2>Love that world. I think that sounds like a great world.

580
00:27:26.240 --> 00:27:28.319
<v Speaker 3>With hitters, it was like how far could they hit

581
00:27:28.359 --> 00:27:30.599
<v Speaker 3>the ball? How fast could they run? We could measure

582
00:27:30.680 --> 00:27:33.359
<v Speaker 3>both of those things, but we couldn't really measure how

583
00:27:33.440 --> 00:27:36.880
<v Speaker 3>hard pitchers were throwing and how effective the pitches were

584
00:27:36.960 --> 00:27:39.240
<v Speaker 3>with numbers. We could do it with our eyes and

585
00:27:39.519 --> 00:27:43.119
<v Speaker 3>with the scouting reports. But once we got the radar gun,

586
00:27:43.359 --> 00:27:46.880
<v Speaker 3>that really like anchored people's opinions. And I think we

587
00:27:47.200 --> 00:27:50.519
<v Speaker 3>see that's true of guys like Isaac Coffee, and I

588
00:27:50.599 --> 00:27:52.359
<v Speaker 3>think it is true of lots of guys who like,

589
00:27:52.440 --> 00:27:54.640
<v Speaker 3>they flashed ninety nine on the gun and they're like, oh,

590
00:27:54.680 --> 00:27:57.559
<v Speaker 3>that's Carlos le Grange is really good, hemer Lalani is

591
00:27:57.599 --> 00:28:00.240
<v Speaker 3>really good. Well, they can actually get guys out out,

592
00:28:00.359 --> 00:28:02.480
<v Speaker 3>but you know they're they're really good because they can

593
00:28:02.519 --> 00:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>throw hard conn only early to me, it is a

594
00:28:05.160 --> 00:28:06.960
<v Speaker 3>good example of this. I think he sits in the

595
00:28:07.000 --> 00:28:11.319
<v Speaker 3>low nineties. It's like ninety one average. Maybe he's a lefty, athletic,

596
00:28:11.440 --> 00:28:15.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of six y three, prototypical pitcher looking guy, you know,

597
00:28:15.160 --> 00:28:17.160
<v Speaker 3>off the bus kind of thing. You watch him, and

598
00:28:17.200 --> 00:28:19.599
<v Speaker 3>if you don't, if you're not looking at the velocity,

599
00:28:19.759 --> 00:28:22.680
<v Speaker 3>you're like, none of these fucking guys can hit this fastball.

600
00:28:22.799 --> 00:28:25.000
<v Speaker 3>He just keeps throwing it in the middle of the plate.

601
00:28:25.200 --> 00:28:27.559
<v Speaker 3>And sure a lot of this was at High A

602
00:28:27.960 --> 00:28:30.640
<v Speaker 3>and Double A. He was about two thirds at High

603
00:28:30.640 --> 00:28:32.599
<v Speaker 3>A this year and a third at Double A this year.

604
00:28:32.680 --> 00:28:35.920
<v Speaker 3>But he just kept throwing this low nineties fastball that

605
00:28:36.119 --> 00:28:38.920
<v Speaker 3>if you're not kind of looking closely, you'd be like, oh,

606
00:28:38.960 --> 00:28:42.480
<v Speaker 3>this isn't that interesting, And yet he kept punching people

607
00:28:42.559 --> 00:28:46.039
<v Speaker 3>out with it. I think that the arm angle and

608
00:28:46.160 --> 00:28:49.160
<v Speaker 3>extension make it play up. I think I saw some

609
00:28:49.279 --> 00:28:51.839
<v Speaker 3>note maybe from the BA guys that it's not an

610
00:28:51.839 --> 00:28:54.920
<v Speaker 3>IVB monster or anything. It's not like a super spinny

611
00:28:55.079 --> 00:28:58.759
<v Speaker 3>low a super spinny pitch. But because the angle is

612
00:28:58.799 --> 00:29:02.079
<v Speaker 3>maybe a little lower then you would expect, it doesn't

613
00:29:02.079 --> 00:29:04.720
<v Speaker 3>need to have great iv B to look really different.

614
00:29:04.880 --> 00:29:08.119
<v Speaker 3>And that pitch plays like it is really really good,

615
00:29:08.200 --> 00:29:12.039
<v Speaker 3>and he also has good command. We're not just talking

616
00:29:12.079 --> 00:29:15.799
<v Speaker 3>about a thrower up there. He's especially of his fastball.

617
00:29:16.039 --> 00:29:18.799
<v Speaker 3>I thought he commanded that exceptionally well in my looks,

618
00:29:18.960 --> 00:29:21.400
<v Speaker 3>and you know, he rounds it out with a couple

619
00:29:21.480 --> 00:29:24.799
<v Speaker 3>of different breaking balls. His slider in particular looked pretty good.

620
00:29:25.240 --> 00:29:27.079
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if he has kind of two like a

621
00:29:27.119 --> 00:29:30.160
<v Speaker 3>sweepery one and a more curve gyro kind of slider,

622
00:29:30.279 --> 00:29:32.039
<v Speaker 3>because it looked like he could go a couple of

623
00:29:32.079 --> 00:29:34.839
<v Speaker 3>different directions with it. A change up as well, that

624
00:29:35.160 --> 00:29:37.200
<v Speaker 3>really good. Like he got a ton of ground balls

625
00:29:37.240 --> 00:29:39.519
<v Speaker 3>with that thing, especially later in the year, it looked

626
00:29:39.519 --> 00:29:41.640
<v Speaker 3>like he was using it more to like people would

627
00:29:41.640 --> 00:29:43.559
<v Speaker 3>be kind of like, oh, I'm sitting on this fastball

628
00:29:43.599 --> 00:29:46.000
<v Speaker 3>that for some reason can't touch, and then he would

629
00:29:46.039 --> 00:29:48.160
<v Speaker 3>throw a change up and get a softly hit ground

630
00:29:48.160 --> 00:29:50.920
<v Speaker 3>ball to the left side, easy out. He's really good.

631
00:29:51.000 --> 00:29:53.240
<v Speaker 3>He was a fifth rounder out of Virginia, so Uva

632
00:29:53.440 --> 00:29:56.640
<v Speaker 3>like big baseball school, but wasn't great there. I think

633
00:29:56.799 --> 00:29:59.960
<v Speaker 3>was seen as like kind of a back end developmental project.

634
00:30:00.119 --> 00:30:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know whether some of this is the pitch

635
00:30:02.559 --> 00:30:05.759
<v Speaker 3>shapes development that the red Sox did this year with

636
00:30:05.839 --> 00:30:09.359
<v Speaker 3>Reslo and the new regime, but early to me looked

637
00:30:09.640 --> 00:30:12.960
<v Speaker 3>absolutely phenomenal, and he was doing it with ease. At

638
00:30:13.039 --> 00:30:15.759
<v Speaker 3>Double A. He gave up one home run in thirty

639
00:30:15.759 --> 00:30:19.039
<v Speaker 3>six innings at Double A, six in sixty seven at

640
00:30:19.240 --> 00:30:22.920
<v Speaker 3>High A. Man was sixteen point four percent swinging strike

641
00:30:23.000 --> 00:30:25.799
<v Speaker 3>rate at Double A, fifteen point seven at High A.

642
00:30:26.119 --> 00:30:29.640
<v Speaker 3>He's punching out thirty point seven percent of batters on

643
00:30:29.680 --> 00:30:32.839
<v Speaker 3>the year with an average league average walk rate. You know,

644
00:30:32.920 --> 00:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>he's among the best K minus BB guys in the

645
00:30:36.480 --> 00:30:38.039
<v Speaker 3>miners this year, and he was doing it at the

646
00:30:38.079 --> 00:30:41.079
<v Speaker 3>mid to uppers for a pretty unherlded guy. You know, again,

647
00:30:41.079 --> 00:30:45.559
<v Speaker 3>I think he was zero percent owned. He was percent Yeah,

648
00:30:45.640 --> 00:30:47.559
<v Speaker 3>I had one percent here too. And you know how

649
00:30:47.599 --> 00:30:50.240
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned how excited I was about Chad Patrick last week,

650
00:30:50.880 --> 00:30:54.200
<v Speaker 3>how the sharpest guy in my favorite league is a

651
00:30:54.200 --> 00:30:57.039
<v Speaker 3>buddy of mine. He's got Chad Patrick. Of course, when

652
00:30:57.039 --> 00:30:59.079
<v Speaker 3>I was looking and doing my research on this at

653
00:30:59.079 --> 00:31:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the end of the season, who has Connolly Early, same

654
00:31:01.759 --> 00:31:02.440
<v Speaker 3>freaking guy.

655
00:31:02.640 --> 00:31:05.240
<v Speaker 2>So we get that guy on the pod man.

656
00:31:05.400 --> 00:31:06.960
<v Speaker 3>We should? We should. He'd be a fun one to

657
00:31:07.279 --> 00:31:11.680
<v Speaker 3>come on. He's super sharp and his his his talent

658
00:31:11.720 --> 00:31:14.720
<v Speaker 3>evaluation skills are really really good. I think Early is

659
00:31:14.759 --> 00:31:18.079
<v Speaker 3>being massively slept on and I don't know, there's there's

660
00:31:18.079 --> 00:31:20.200
<v Speaker 3>a couple of other arms that I'm really really excited

661
00:31:20.240 --> 00:31:22.400
<v Speaker 3>about from this crew, but he's up there. I mean,

662
00:31:22.440 --> 00:31:25.519
<v Speaker 3>this is I am as excited about Early on my

663
00:31:25.640 --> 00:31:28.440
<v Speaker 3>B side arms as I am about really anybody else

664
00:31:28.519 --> 00:31:29.680
<v Speaker 3>like he's. He is up there.

665
00:31:29.759 --> 00:31:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Do you know Clegg's pretty tapped in, tuned into

666
00:31:33.319 --> 00:31:36.279
<v Speaker 2>the red sox system and recently wrote them up. Do

667
00:31:36.400 --> 00:31:38.680
<v Speaker 2>you know if he was on Clegg's list or if

668
00:31:38.720 --> 00:31:41.119
<v Speaker 2>Clegg had anything any four one one on him?

669
00:31:41.119 --> 00:31:45.759
<v Speaker 3>No idea, no idea. I haven't looked at his ass lists.

670
00:31:45.880 --> 00:31:48.759
<v Speaker 2>Right well, I am not nearly as excited for mine,

671
00:31:48.920 --> 00:31:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and this will be the last time tonight, but I

672
00:31:51.240 --> 00:31:54.119
<v Speaker 2>am going with another teenager. I'm gonna go with young

673
00:31:54.279 --> 00:31:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Juan Valera percent rostered. Like I said before, this is

674
00:31:58.480 --> 00:32:00.240
<v Speaker 2>if I had to line them all up, this probably

675
00:32:00.319 --> 00:32:02.400
<v Speaker 2>number thirty on my list. But I don't think it's

676
00:32:02.400 --> 00:32:05.920
<v Speaker 2>because of lack of talent or lack of something interesting,

677
00:32:06.039 --> 00:32:08.160
<v Speaker 2>or lack of a way that it could work and

678
00:32:08.200 --> 00:32:10.519
<v Speaker 2>go well. I think all thirty of my guys have

679
00:32:10.640 --> 00:32:13.720
<v Speaker 2>that he's listed at sixty three. He was a twenty

680
00:32:13.799 --> 00:32:16.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty three international free agent out of the Dominican time

681
00:32:17.000 --> 00:32:19.640
<v Speaker 2>for forty five thousand, forty and a third innings in

682
00:32:19.680 --> 00:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the complex this last season, twenty three innings over seven

683
00:32:23.480 --> 00:32:27.319
<v Speaker 2>starts able at Greenville two point three five era A

684
00:32:27.440 --> 00:32:30.160
<v Speaker 2>one whip A three point four to eight x fIF

685
00:32:30.279 --> 00:32:33.880
<v Speaker 2>a thirty one point one K percentage to a fifteen

686
00:32:33.960 --> 00:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>point six percent walk percentage ouch, but in the Complex

687
00:32:37.720 --> 00:32:40.400
<v Speaker 2>it was nine percent, so not nearly as bad, but

688
00:32:40.480 --> 00:32:44.599
<v Speaker 2>again small samples. At Greenville, hitters hit one eighteen against them,

689
00:32:44.759 --> 00:32:48.440
<v Speaker 2>got a good amount of ground balls fifty nine percent

690
00:32:48.759 --> 00:32:51.640
<v Speaker 2>according to fangrafs, the swing strike rate of fifteen point

691
00:32:51.680 --> 00:32:54.000
<v Speaker 2>seven percent, So like other than the walk rate, there

692
00:32:54.000 --> 00:32:57.319
<v Speaker 2>are some pretty nice numbers in his little uh full

693
00:32:57.359 --> 00:33:01.519
<v Speaker 2>season debut. But I will say, unlike Orbina or several

694
00:33:01.519 --> 00:33:05.359
<v Speaker 2>others that I mentioned, the numbers were a lot prettier

695
00:33:05.640 --> 00:33:09.079
<v Speaker 2>than the video looks to me. But this is arm talent, right,

696
00:33:09.160 --> 00:33:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is a guy who can get up

697
00:33:10.920 --> 00:33:15.039
<v Speaker 2>there ninety five. There's something that he's throwing at ninety

698
00:33:15.400 --> 00:33:18.160
<v Speaker 2>there's a breaking ball. Mean yeah, Like the video starts

699
00:33:18.160 --> 00:33:20.599
<v Speaker 2>off with like a backed up slider. I think that

700
00:33:20.759 --> 00:33:23.480
<v Speaker 2>happened quite a bit. There's a fastball not I hit

701
00:33:23.599 --> 00:33:26.200
<v Speaker 2>ninety seven, like a lot of pitchers in their system.

702
00:33:26.279 --> 00:33:30.119
<v Speaker 2>There's a splitter being worked one right. There's a curveball,

703
00:33:30.559 --> 00:33:33.599
<v Speaker 2>a firmer curveball at like eighty six, but maybe they

704
00:33:33.640 --> 00:33:35.519
<v Speaker 2>call it a slider. I don't know, a breaking ball,

705
00:33:35.640 --> 00:33:37.599
<v Speaker 2>what have you. My looks with him is like he

706
00:33:37.640 --> 00:33:40.160
<v Speaker 2>could very much look the part for like a batter

707
00:33:40.359 --> 00:33:43.079
<v Speaker 2>or half a batter, but like then the non competitive

708
00:33:43.119 --> 00:33:45.279
<v Speaker 2>pitches would just come out, you know what I mean.

709
00:33:45.359 --> 00:33:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Like it was just way way too much for me

710
00:33:47.359 --> 00:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to get like two two into him. But again we're

711
00:33:49.680 --> 00:33:52.279
<v Speaker 2>talking about an eighteen year old ball clay here. Plenty

712
00:33:52.279 --> 00:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>of arm talent, not anyone that I want to rush

713
00:33:54.640 --> 00:33:57.359
<v Speaker 2>out and roster or draft or anything like that, but

714
00:33:57.400 --> 00:33:59.640
<v Speaker 2>definitely one that I will keep an eye on. And yeah,

715
00:33:59.680 --> 00:34:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I could see a guy that talented getting it together

716
00:34:02.920 --> 00:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit and having some more success and getting

717
00:34:05.079 --> 00:34:08.000
<v Speaker 2>more polished. I do have to say the Red Sox

718
00:34:08.039 --> 00:34:10.159
<v Speaker 2>system the last several years kind of like b side

719
00:34:10.199 --> 00:34:12.599
<v Speaker 2>in front arm. I haven't really loved a lot of guys,

720
00:34:12.599 --> 00:34:15.559
<v Speaker 2>but they have they have had I feel like just

721
00:34:15.559 --> 00:34:18.559
<v Speaker 2>just young teenagers in the lowers with a lot of

722
00:34:18.719 --> 00:34:21.920
<v Speaker 2>arm talent, and they got those guys cleaned up and

723
00:34:22.039 --> 00:34:24.679
<v Speaker 2>executing way better than I ever would have bet on

724
00:34:24.840 --> 00:34:28.280
<v Speaker 2>guys like Juan Daniel and Canarcion guy today who got

725
00:34:28.320 --> 00:34:32.119
<v Speaker 2>drafted in the five draft on hell Bastardo, Like, I

726
00:34:32.159 --> 00:34:35.239
<v Speaker 2>think they were way more feral looking. Maybe they were

727
00:34:35.280 --> 00:34:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit older, but during their like A ball debuts.

728
00:34:38.559 --> 00:34:40.800
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I think there's some cleaning up that

729
00:34:40.840 --> 00:34:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the Red Sox do with some guys. So I don't

730
00:34:43.000 --> 00:34:45.320
<v Speaker 2>think that I'm gonna worry too much about his walk

731
00:34:45.360 --> 00:34:48.920
<v Speaker 2>percentage and non competitive pitches at this juncture.

732
00:34:49.000 --> 00:34:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that might be a good beat. And they've got

733
00:34:50.960 --> 00:34:53.320
<v Speaker 3>quite a few guys that have that kind of talent

734
00:34:53.440 --> 00:34:56.239
<v Speaker 3>and ceiling and if they can just harness the wax,

735
00:34:56.239 --> 00:34:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I meane Mullins, is that guy, your guy from last

736
00:34:58.960 --> 00:35:02.320
<v Speaker 3>year and he did, you know, kept punching people out

737
00:35:02.320 --> 00:35:04.920
<v Speaker 3>this year and was okay with the walks still a

738
00:35:04.920 --> 00:35:06.480
<v Speaker 3>little bit higher than you'd like to see.

739
00:35:06.559 --> 00:35:08.880
<v Speaker 2>But my hope with him is, like we're still talking

740
00:35:08.880 --> 00:35:11.039
<v Speaker 2>about a guy who has not pitched very much over

741
00:35:11.079 --> 00:35:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the last several years, so maybe maybe that can bring

742
00:35:14.320 --> 00:35:17.599
<v Speaker 2>some hope. Maybe that's just a fool stream, but yeah,

743
00:35:17.639 --> 00:35:21.320
<v Speaker 2>all right, the Bats, Red Sox Bats. I didn't come

744
00:35:21.400 --> 00:35:24.639
<v Speaker 2>up with someone I love a ton, but I am

745
00:35:24.719 --> 00:35:30.199
<v Speaker 2>gonna go with young Nelly Taylor. Not probably like my

746
00:35:30.599 --> 00:35:33.159
<v Speaker 2>kind of bet here, but I think there's some things

747
00:35:33.199 --> 00:35:35.719
<v Speaker 2>to like and hope on. He was twenty one last year.

748
00:35:35.840 --> 00:35:39.039
<v Speaker 2>Played center field, lefty. Listed at six foot. He was

749
00:35:39.039 --> 00:35:41.519
<v Speaker 2>an eleventh round pick in twenty twenty three out of

750
00:35:41.639 --> 00:35:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Junior College in Florida. One hundred and one games in

751
00:35:43.840 --> 00:35:47.119
<v Speaker 2>A ball, ten games in High A this season. Strikeouts

752
00:35:47.199 --> 00:35:50.199
<v Speaker 2>probably the swing and miss stuff probably the biggest, you know,

753
00:35:50.320 --> 00:35:52.920
<v Speaker 2>wart Here twenty five point one percent on the season.

754
00:35:52.960 --> 00:35:55.840
<v Speaker 2>It was thirty one point seven percent in his short

755
00:35:55.920 --> 00:35:59.360
<v Speaker 2>High A stint on the year. Nothing too remarkable on

756
00:35:59.480 --> 00:36:03.239
<v Speaker 2>the surface, numbers two thirty three, three thirty seven, three

757
00:36:03.679 --> 00:36:06.639
<v Speaker 2>seventy six slash. But even though he struck out more,

758
00:36:06.800 --> 00:36:09.360
<v Speaker 2>that slash plan was much more attractive in his small

759
00:36:09.440 --> 00:36:12.079
<v Speaker 2>high sample size two eighty nine, three forty one, five

760
00:36:12.079 --> 00:36:14.679
<v Speaker 2>point fifty three eight home runs on the season, stole

761
00:36:14.760 --> 00:36:17.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty three bases on the season. But I think ultimately

762
00:36:17.840 --> 00:36:21.239
<v Speaker 2>matt Here is like an athletic guy a strong guy,

763
00:36:21.920 --> 00:36:24.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe just a little b side hope on a power

764
00:36:24.360 --> 00:36:27.000
<v Speaker 2>speed Brett And I know that I'm not the only

765
00:36:27.039 --> 00:36:30.360
<v Speaker 2>stand I think Maddy Backpack is is a Nelly Taylor

766
00:36:30.440 --> 00:36:33.480
<v Speaker 2>hopeful too, but real strong, powerful lower half. I think

767
00:36:33.480 --> 00:36:35.559
<v Speaker 2>he uses it well in his swing, and I don't know,

768
00:36:35.599 --> 00:36:37.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe he was coming into his own just a little

769
00:36:37.400 --> 00:36:40.000
<v Speaker 2>bit down the stretch here. Not anyone I'm rostering, not

770
00:36:40.079 --> 00:36:43.159
<v Speaker 2>anyone I am drafting, but somebody that I got my

771
00:36:43.239 --> 00:36:45.039
<v Speaker 2>eye on, and if it goes well, I think it

772
00:36:45.159 --> 00:36:45.800
<v Speaker 2>go really well.

773
00:36:45.920 --> 00:36:48.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I thought similarly of Taylor. He was one of

774
00:36:48.159 --> 00:36:50.559
<v Speaker 3>the couple that I was looking at as well. I

775
00:36:50.760 --> 00:36:53.920
<v Speaker 3>didn't love any of the options at the low roster

776
00:36:54.000 --> 00:36:58.159
<v Speaker 3>percentages here for Boston. I think when Boston's guys blow up,

777
00:36:58.159 --> 00:37:01.280
<v Speaker 3>they're either really really good or they get pretty quickly. Yeah,

778
00:37:01.280 --> 00:37:03.880
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, No, Taylor's a decent shout. I'm going to

779
00:37:04.000 --> 00:37:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Andy Lugo for a lot of the same reasons. He's

780
00:37:06.800 --> 00:37:11.679
<v Speaker 3>you know, a level below Nellie Taylor and similarly has

781
00:37:11.800 --> 00:37:14.719
<v Speaker 3>decent speed, decent athlete. I'm not sure he has a

782
00:37:15.079 --> 00:37:17.280
<v Speaker 3>defensive home. You know, they played him all over the

783
00:37:17.320 --> 00:37:21.440
<v Speaker 3>place already, and he's pretty young and He's played left field,

784
00:37:21.519 --> 00:37:24.599
<v Speaker 3>third base, right field, first base, and I don't know

785
00:37:24.639 --> 00:37:26.480
<v Speaker 3>if he's that good, and I think he's even played

786
00:37:26.519 --> 00:37:28.480
<v Speaker 3>some second I just don't know if he's good at

787
00:37:28.519 --> 00:37:30.159
<v Speaker 3>any of them. I watched a little bit of his

788
00:37:30.239 --> 00:37:33.000
<v Speaker 3>decent defense, but not enough to make a real strong

789
00:37:33.079 --> 00:37:35.639
<v Speaker 3>case one way or the other. But given he's had

790
00:37:36.039 --> 00:37:38.800
<v Speaker 3>a penchant for errors, I tend to think that this

791
00:37:38.880 --> 00:37:41.239
<v Speaker 3>is kind of like they're trying to find him a home.

792
00:37:41.599 --> 00:37:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Is one of those guys that kind of looks better

793
00:37:43.360 --> 00:37:46.800
<v Speaker 3>than his statistical performance. I think, like you watch him swing, he's,

794
00:37:47.000 --> 00:37:49.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, six ' two or so, kind of lean.

795
00:37:50.320 --> 00:37:53.679
<v Speaker 3>You think maybe there's some projection there. He's still just

796
00:37:53.760 --> 00:37:56.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty he'll be twenty one next year and likely and

797
00:37:56.719 --> 00:37:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Hi A, I think that's kind of a it'll be

798
00:37:59.360 --> 00:38:02.519
<v Speaker 3>a real statement ear for Lugo. If he starts to

799
00:38:02.599 --> 00:38:05.159
<v Speaker 3>hit for a little more power and keeps running like

800
00:38:05.239 --> 00:38:07.400
<v Speaker 3>he does, that could be a really interesting bat here.

801
00:38:07.480 --> 00:38:09.559
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty aggressive as a hitter, and I think that

802
00:38:09.599 --> 00:38:13.719
<v Speaker 3>gets into troublesometimes. But he did hit a decent number

803
00:38:13.719 --> 00:38:15.920
<v Speaker 3>of doubles, so I think maybe there's a little bit

804
00:38:15.960 --> 00:38:18.519
<v Speaker 3>more power than the three homers and four hundred plate

805
00:38:18.559 --> 00:38:21.400
<v Speaker 3>appearances would suggest, but his line of two sixty three,

806
00:38:21.480 --> 00:38:24.039
<v Speaker 3>three thirty seven, three seventy one has nothing to write

807
00:38:24.039 --> 00:38:26.760
<v Speaker 3>home about. And like you, I'm not brushing out to

808
00:38:26.880 --> 00:38:28.880
<v Speaker 3>roster him. It's more like, let me put a pin

809
00:38:28.960 --> 00:38:31.159
<v Speaker 3>in this guy and watch him early next year to

810
00:38:31.159 --> 00:38:33.480
<v Speaker 3>see if he's put on a little bit more game

811
00:38:33.559 --> 00:38:35.800
<v Speaker 3>power and maybe maybe there's something here.

812
00:38:35.880 --> 00:38:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, well, red Socks are gaining the reputation

813
00:38:38.679 --> 00:38:42.360
<v Speaker 2>of being the bat speed folks up in everyone's bat speed.

814
00:38:42.159 --> 00:38:44.480
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know, Yeah, maybe maybe he can do that.

815
00:38:44.559 --> 00:38:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they've done that with some guys, But

816
00:38:46.599 --> 00:38:48.559
<v Speaker 2>that that wraps up the Red Sox, right.

817
00:38:48.639 --> 00:38:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they or the or the Rays I think were

818
00:38:51.400 --> 00:38:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the least interesting. I think all of the next guys

819
00:38:54.440 --> 00:38:56.480
<v Speaker 3>that we're going to talk about are are fascinating in

820
00:38:56.480 --> 00:38:57.159
<v Speaker 3>one way or another.

821
00:38:57.280 --> 00:39:00.039
<v Speaker 2>I agree, let's do the Orioles.

822
00:38:59.480 --> 00:39:02.519
<v Speaker 3>Matte nasty with it. These are I think we'll we'll

823
00:39:02.559 --> 00:39:04.599
<v Speaker 3>talk about it. But there there are so many fun

824
00:39:04.639 --> 00:39:07.920
<v Speaker 3>places to go in the Oriole system.

825
00:39:07.639 --> 00:39:09.719
<v Speaker 2>I think, so let's start on the arm side. You

826
00:39:09.760 --> 00:39:13.159
<v Speaker 2>look at their roster percentages, like they are so unpopular

827
00:39:13.400 --> 00:39:17.039
<v Speaker 2>of an arm system, do not understand that no, Chase

828
00:39:17.119 --> 00:39:20.840
<v Speaker 2>McDermott twenty four percent, and then nobody was above three

829
00:39:20.880 --> 00:39:24.519
<v Speaker 2>percent in September in their system. Prospect wise, Louis staleone

830
00:39:24.639 --> 00:39:27.840
<v Speaker 2>trace Bright were three percent, Michael Ferrett two percent, Patrick

831
00:39:27.920 --> 00:39:31.119
<v Speaker 2>Riiley two percent, pe For Morphy two percent, Brandon Young

832
00:39:31.159 --> 00:39:33.480
<v Speaker 2>two percent. Do one. Nunez get popped today in the

833
00:39:33.480 --> 00:39:36.000
<v Speaker 2>real five draft. I thought he did. He was one percent.

834
00:39:36.679 --> 00:39:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Alex fam Is one was one percent. The guy I'm

835
00:39:39.800 --> 00:39:42.559
<v Speaker 2>gonna go with was at zero percent in September, and

836
00:39:42.679 --> 00:39:48.000
<v Speaker 2>it's ludicrous. I'm going with Nestor German nice who might

837
00:39:48.039 --> 00:39:51.039
<v Speaker 2>be my number one arm might be my number one

838
00:39:51.079 --> 00:39:54.360
<v Speaker 2>pick when we draft, might be my my pick. Now,

839
00:39:54.360 --> 00:39:57.119
<v Speaker 2>obviously this is a long shot bet. But if someone's

840
00:39:57.159 --> 00:40:01.079
<v Speaker 2>gonna Christian Scott or Zebbie Matthews this year, Meser Germans

841
00:40:01.119 --> 00:40:03.039
<v Speaker 2>my pick, I don't know what kind of odds you

842
00:40:03.119 --> 00:40:04.519
<v Speaker 2>might give me on that sort of bet, but I

843
00:40:04.599 --> 00:40:06.679
<v Speaker 2>might take. I don't know if you've watched a lot

844
00:40:06.719 --> 00:40:09.599
<v Speaker 2>of German, which I wanted to say, I wanted to

845
00:40:09.599 --> 00:40:12.480
<v Speaker 2>say Herman, but they were pronouncing that German. But he's

846
00:40:12.519 --> 00:40:14.760
<v Speaker 2>from up by kind of your neck of the woods.

847
00:40:14.760 --> 00:40:18.079
<v Speaker 2>He went to the University of Sattle. You or Seattle you. Yeah, Well,

848
00:40:18.119 --> 00:40:20.079
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, maybe he was. Maybe he was one percent

849
00:40:20.159 --> 00:40:22.679
<v Speaker 2>rostered in September. My apologies, Matt, Well he was. He

850
00:40:22.760 --> 00:40:25.599
<v Speaker 2>was zero percent in the beginning of September, one percent

851
00:40:25.639 --> 00:40:27.159
<v Speaker 2>at the end of September. And I know that he's

852
00:40:27.159 --> 00:40:29.719
<v Speaker 2>only rostered in one of my leagues when he was

853
00:40:29.760 --> 00:40:31.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty two and a half years old. His last start,

854
00:40:31.880 --> 00:40:34.960
<v Speaker 2>he's listed at six three. He's a righty eleventh round

855
00:40:35.159 --> 00:40:38.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty three pick out of Seattle. He spent twenty

856
00:40:38.480 --> 00:40:41.119
<v Speaker 2>twenty four throwing forty eight and a third innings in

857
00:40:41.159 --> 00:40:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a ball and then twenty five and a third innings

858
00:40:43.519 --> 00:40:45.920
<v Speaker 2>in high A. Now watching pictures. I don't know if

859
00:40:45.920 --> 00:40:48.239
<v Speaker 2>this plays into some of the lack of popularity, but

860
00:40:48.400 --> 00:40:50.599
<v Speaker 2>watching pictures in this system and the lowers is a

861
00:40:50.639 --> 00:40:53.440
<v Speaker 2>little tough. There's not like great broadcasts to do it,

862
00:40:53.440 --> 00:40:55.639
<v Speaker 2>at least their home broadcasts. So that was a little

863
00:40:55.639 --> 00:40:57.960
<v Speaker 2>bit of a trick watching German, but it did not

864
00:40:58.199 --> 00:41:01.840
<v Speaker 2>deter me from coming away with some pretty high opinions.

865
00:41:02.039 --> 00:41:05.519
<v Speaker 2>I think German is a poster child of sorts for

866
00:41:05.920 --> 00:41:08.039
<v Speaker 2>draft a good pitcher and hope that the stuff gets

867
00:41:08.119 --> 00:41:10.519
<v Speaker 2>better because the stuff over the course of the season

868
00:41:10.599 --> 00:41:14.480
<v Speaker 2>got way better. They added velocity, life throws, a good

869
00:41:14.559 --> 00:41:18.199
<v Speaker 2>firm slider, like, all of it got better. His season

870
00:41:18.280 --> 00:41:21.320
<v Speaker 2>nine seventy three and two thirds one five nine ERA

871
00:41:21.320 --> 00:41:23.360
<v Speaker 2>a point nine to four whip a two point sixty

872
00:41:23.400 --> 00:41:26.119
<v Speaker 2>three x FIP, thirty one point four K percentage of

873
00:41:26.199 --> 00:41:30.000
<v Speaker 2>five point nine walk percentage. That's not too shabby, Matt.

874
00:41:30.079 --> 00:41:33.639
<v Speaker 2>The very very good hitters hit one ninety three against him,

875
00:41:33.800 --> 00:41:37.519
<v Speaker 2>ground ball percentage of almost fifty percent, didn't give up

876
00:41:37.519 --> 00:41:40.039
<v Speaker 2>a lot of home runs through strikes at a sixty

877
00:41:40.119 --> 00:41:42.840
<v Speaker 2>five percent clip. Now, maybe another part is, you know

878
00:41:42.920 --> 00:41:46.360
<v Speaker 2>he's piggybacking. Was piggybacking? You know they do that in

879
00:41:46.360 --> 00:41:47.760
<v Speaker 2>that system. They have a lot of guys they want

880
00:41:47.800 --> 00:41:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to get innings too. After he moved up to Hi A,

881
00:41:50.639 --> 00:41:53.800
<v Speaker 2>he didn't technically start any game in High A, but

882
00:41:53.840 --> 00:41:56.199
<v Speaker 2>he did go three four and two thirds four three

883
00:41:56.199 --> 00:41:58.880
<v Speaker 2>and two thirds, four and four innings pitched in those

884
00:41:58.920 --> 00:42:02.119
<v Speaker 2>one two three what outings? I think the fastball is

885
00:42:02.119 --> 00:42:04.960
<v Speaker 2>probably like I don't know, ninety five ninety six. It

886
00:42:05.079 --> 00:42:07.119
<v Speaker 2>was really good from sledder. Like I mentioned, there's a

887
00:42:07.199 --> 00:42:09.800
<v Speaker 2>curve ball as well that I think looks pretty nasty.

888
00:42:09.920 --> 00:42:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if the change up. The change up

889
00:42:12.039 --> 00:42:14.679
<v Speaker 2>might be his least developed offering.

890
00:42:14.840 --> 00:42:17.039
<v Speaker 3>I still think it's really good. Yeah, yeah, you know,

891
00:42:17.239 --> 00:42:19.480
<v Speaker 3>it's worth noting on the fastball that I think it

892
00:42:19.800 --> 00:42:22.599
<v Speaker 3>rides really well. I mean, you look at his arm angle.

893
00:42:22.599 --> 00:42:24.559
<v Speaker 3>It's a little more over the top than some of

894
00:42:24.559 --> 00:42:26.960
<v Speaker 3>the guys. It's not like a Bryce Miller super flat

895
00:42:27.079 --> 00:42:30.119
<v Speaker 3>rising fastball. But I think it looks to me. I

896
00:42:30.159 --> 00:42:32.639
<v Speaker 3>don't have any IVB numbers on him or anything, but

897
00:42:32.800 --> 00:42:36.039
<v Speaker 3>it looks to me visually like he's getting good ride

898
00:42:36.159 --> 00:42:38.440
<v Speaker 3>with it because he's coming right over the top, and

899
00:42:38.760 --> 00:42:39.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that's helping it play.

900
00:42:40.000 --> 00:42:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, and when you just talk about like

901
00:42:42.039 --> 00:42:46.519
<v Speaker 2>good arsenal and good execution coming together, I think that's

902
00:42:47.119 --> 00:42:49.920
<v Speaker 2>that's Nestor German here big time. I you know, kind

903
00:42:49.920 --> 00:42:51.760
<v Speaker 2>of let it out in the discord that this was,

904
00:42:51.880 --> 00:42:54.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe my favorite B side arm And I

905
00:42:54.320 --> 00:42:57.199
<v Speaker 2>know Clegg chrimmed in so that he might think he's

906
00:42:57.280 --> 00:43:01.079
<v Speaker 2>the most underrated pigeon prospect in baseball. I think there's

907
00:43:01.079 --> 00:43:03.840
<v Speaker 2>a case for that for sure. Hopefully he graduates from

908
00:43:03.880 --> 00:43:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the piggyback stage of his development here and full on

909
00:43:07.559 --> 00:43:09.559
<v Speaker 2>starter go and he's a guy who I think you

910
00:43:09.599 --> 00:43:11.719
<v Speaker 2>could drop and you could drop into the biggs right now.

911
00:43:11.800 --> 00:43:13.519
<v Speaker 2>And some of his some of the at bats, some

912
00:43:13.559 --> 00:43:16.920
<v Speaker 2>of the sequencing, quality of stuff, quality of the execution,

913
00:43:17.280 --> 00:43:19.679
<v Speaker 2>like that's going to give major league hitters a hard

914
00:43:19.719 --> 00:43:23.519
<v Speaker 2>time right now. It's just doing it all the time consistently.

915
00:43:23.719 --> 00:43:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Obviously is a big hurdle for a loud guys. But

916
00:43:26.079 --> 00:43:28.280
<v Speaker 2>I like the bet and I like the chances that

917
00:43:28.400 --> 00:43:31.679
<v Speaker 2>this is a major league This is a dude. Yeah, yeah, No,

918
00:43:32.280 --> 00:43:33.039
<v Speaker 2>one's rostering.

919
00:43:33.320 --> 00:43:36.679
<v Speaker 3>I co signed this one. I am a rosterer myself

920
00:43:36.840 --> 00:43:40.159
<v Speaker 3>in my thirty team deep league that I love. I

921
00:43:40.599 --> 00:43:43.800
<v Speaker 3>second everything you say, and I knew he was going

922
00:43:43.880 --> 00:43:46.559
<v Speaker 3>to be your pick, so I'm not gonna co sign

923
00:43:46.559 --> 00:43:49.559
<v Speaker 3>it for purposes of the B side or draft. But no,

924
00:43:49.679 --> 00:43:51.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm a big fan as well. I think this is

925
00:43:51.840 --> 00:43:55.760
<v Speaker 3>a great pick. My one concern about him at this

926
00:43:55.880 --> 00:43:59.480
<v Speaker 3>stage is the innings and are they going to let

927
00:43:59.519 --> 00:44:02.760
<v Speaker 3>him up into that workhorse or are they going to

928
00:44:02.840 --> 00:44:05.599
<v Speaker 3>pen him because looking at the way the stuff plays,

929
00:44:05.880 --> 00:44:10.159
<v Speaker 3>the fastball, slider, change up combo as a reliever, like

930
00:44:10.360 --> 00:44:12.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe they just want to fast track him to do

931
00:44:12.440 --> 00:44:14.360
<v Speaker 3>that because they do have a lot of these like

932
00:44:14.519 --> 00:44:18.519
<v Speaker 3>starters that are have really good stuff and have some

933
00:44:19.039 --> 00:44:22.280
<v Speaker 3>innings under their belt. You know, Povich and McDermott and

934
00:44:22.320 --> 00:44:25.599
<v Speaker 3>Brandon Young, I think all are big league quality starters.

935
00:44:25.719 --> 00:44:28.800
<v Speaker 3>But none of them I think is like that you know,

936
00:44:29.239 --> 00:44:32.559
<v Speaker 3>Ace type guy, and so maybe, but they're all ahead

937
00:44:32.719 --> 00:44:35.239
<v Speaker 3>of where German is and some of the other guys

938
00:44:35.239 --> 00:44:38.000
<v Speaker 3>that we'll talk about. So I wonder if they have

939
00:44:38.159 --> 00:44:40.320
<v Speaker 3>seen just how much this stuff plays up. I mean,

940
00:44:40.320 --> 00:44:43.320
<v Speaker 3>you're talking like nineteen point seven percent swinging strike rate

941
00:44:43.400 --> 00:44:46.760
<v Speaker 3>in high A super impressive. That is up there as

942
00:44:47.280 --> 00:44:49.559
<v Speaker 3>some of the nastiest stuff in the minors. So my

943
00:44:49.679 --> 00:44:53.800
<v Speaker 3>one concern is that they stop him starting next year.

944
00:44:54.000 --> 00:44:57.559
<v Speaker 2>And for whatever, This is where I threw out one

945
00:44:57.559 --> 00:44:59.559
<v Speaker 2>of their brass that I thought he might be my

946
00:44:59.599 --> 00:45:02.400
<v Speaker 2>favorite arm in their whole system, and where they didn't

947
00:45:02.400 --> 00:45:04.920
<v Speaker 2>think that was a crazy notion. So take that for whatever.

948
00:45:05.559 --> 00:45:08.639
<v Speaker 3>That's good to hear. I mean, I want to see him,

949
00:45:08.719 --> 00:45:10.679
<v Speaker 3>give him a chance, like, let's see what he does

950
00:45:10.719 --> 00:45:12.760
<v Speaker 3>at the double A rotation and see if he can

951
00:45:12.880 --> 00:45:16.360
<v Speaker 3>build some innings, because you're you're absolutely right, the stuff

952
00:45:16.440 --> 00:45:19.519
<v Speaker 3>is hillacious and it is really it's fun watching him

953
00:45:19.559 --> 00:45:21.760
<v Speaker 3>pitch too, Like you see him just attack guys and

954
00:45:22.199 --> 00:45:25.360
<v Speaker 3>something doesn't work, they'll try something different and it often

955
00:45:25.440 --> 00:45:28.199
<v Speaker 3>works the second time. So he's it's fun.

956
00:45:28.320 --> 00:45:30.320
<v Speaker 2>It's super great to see a guy who's like stuff

957
00:45:30.519 --> 00:45:33.320
<v Speaker 2>just like ticked up over this year and like doesn't

958
00:45:33.360 --> 00:45:35.920
<v Speaker 2>skip a beat with the you know, the execution and

959
00:45:35.960 --> 00:45:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the strike throwing and stuff that all just stayed where

960
00:45:38.920 --> 00:45:40.639
<v Speaker 2>it was too, Like, I don't know, I don't know

961
00:45:40.679 --> 00:45:41.960
<v Speaker 2>if you see that every day.

962
00:45:42.079 --> 00:45:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah again, I already mentioned him, but Brandon Young is

963
00:45:45.320 --> 00:45:47.519
<v Speaker 3>another of my favorite guys in the system. I really

964
00:45:47.599 --> 00:45:50.480
<v Speaker 3>like Chase McDermott too. I know the walks are higher

965
00:45:50.519 --> 00:45:53.039
<v Speaker 3>than I usually like to see, but I watched a

966
00:45:53.039 --> 00:45:54.960
<v Speaker 3>good bit of him this year before he got hurt

967
00:45:55.039 --> 00:45:57.599
<v Speaker 3>and thought that it was getting better, like the command

968
00:45:57.800 --> 00:46:00.440
<v Speaker 3>was tightening up and the stuff was staying and he

969
00:46:00.480 --> 00:46:03.360
<v Speaker 3>was still getting the punch outs. Like McDermott looks really

970
00:46:03.400 --> 00:46:05.960
<v Speaker 3>exciting if they can hone that that strike throwing just

971
00:46:06.000 --> 00:46:08.199
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. And I think Brandon Young looks like

972
00:46:08.239 --> 00:46:10.639
<v Speaker 3>a you know, number four, number three kind of starter.

973
00:46:10.719 --> 00:46:13.000
<v Speaker 3>And what did you say, he's two percent owned? Yeah,

974
00:46:13.000 --> 00:46:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Like that's ridiculous to me, Like he's I would take

975
00:46:15.760 --> 00:46:19.320
<v Speaker 3>him over most of the pictures in the FYPD draft

976
00:46:19.320 --> 00:46:21.960
<v Speaker 3>that's upcoming, Like, I think he's going to be real good.

977
00:46:22.079 --> 00:46:24.039
<v Speaker 2>Before you name your guy, I just want to throw

978
00:46:24.159 --> 00:46:26.199
<v Speaker 2>what was my short list here, because I think it

979
00:46:26.199 --> 00:46:28.400
<v Speaker 2>could have been quite long. I kind of think I

980
00:46:28.480 --> 00:46:29.960
<v Speaker 2>might know who you're going to pick. But tell me

981
00:46:30.000 --> 00:46:33.039
<v Speaker 2>if your guy's on this list here, Brax and Bragg,

982
00:46:33.239 --> 00:46:35.719
<v Speaker 2>Cam Weston, I picked him last year, So not him,

983
00:46:35.719 --> 00:46:39.280
<v Speaker 2>but Blake Money, Levi Wells, Ty Weatherley, Trey Gibson.

984
00:46:39.400 --> 00:46:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, none of those guys.

985
00:46:40.519 --> 00:46:43.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, my other finalist in this system, and

986
00:46:43.239 --> 00:46:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of other guys that could

987
00:46:45.360 --> 00:46:46.400
<v Speaker 2>be in that list too.

988
00:46:46.599 --> 00:46:48.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, A couple of those guys I think are

989
00:46:48.119 --> 00:46:51.599
<v Speaker 3>pretty interesting. I mean I looked at Blake Money, huge dude.

990
00:46:52.000 --> 00:46:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Stuff looks pretty good, big fun Beard just he's still

991
00:46:56.119 --> 00:46:58.920
<v Speaker 3>a little raw for me, and I think still has

992
00:46:58.960 --> 00:47:00.519
<v Speaker 3>some work to do there. I don't know if you

993
00:47:00.559 --> 00:47:05.519
<v Speaker 3>came to the same conclusion. The other guy that I

994
00:47:05.719 --> 00:47:08.320
<v Speaker 3>was really excited about I think I had mentioned before,

995
00:47:08.480 --> 00:47:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Peter Van Luhn.

996
00:47:09.760 --> 00:47:13.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's why that was my favorite. That my ads

997
00:47:13.119 --> 00:47:14.239
<v Speaker 2>on bet that you'd pick.

998
00:47:14.199 --> 00:47:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Van Lune is awesome. I think super underrated and I

999
00:47:19.320 --> 00:47:22.079
<v Speaker 3>think he's another one of these guys that was a

1000
00:47:22.159 --> 00:47:25.559
<v Speaker 3>late pick out of UC Irvine, and as he's gone

1001
00:47:25.639 --> 00:47:28.199
<v Speaker 3>up the levels, seems like he just keeps getting better,

1002
00:47:28.320 --> 00:47:31.119
<v Speaker 3>you know, punching out thirty one percent of batters at

1003
00:47:31.199 --> 00:47:34.320
<v Speaker 3>double A in a starter's workload. You know, he's got

1004
00:47:34.360 --> 00:47:37.440
<v Speaker 3>eleven starts there. The walks ticked up a little bit too,

1005
00:47:37.480 --> 00:47:39.920
<v Speaker 3>which I don't I don't love, but twenty point six,

1006
00:47:40.079 --> 00:47:43.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight point six came I as BB two sixteen

1007
00:47:43.519 --> 00:47:47.360
<v Speaker 3>average against really really solid stuff across the board, solid

1008
00:47:47.559 --> 00:47:51.280
<v Speaker 3>power pitcher. I think that he could follow that kind

1009
00:47:51.280 --> 00:47:53.880
<v Speaker 3>of McDermott path and like the stuff keep ticking up

1010
00:47:53.920 --> 00:47:55.920
<v Speaker 3>and if he can keep the walks in check, which

1011
00:47:56.119 --> 00:47:59.199
<v Speaker 3>historically he's been like more a good strike thrower than

1012
00:47:59.199 --> 00:48:01.880
<v Speaker 3>a great one. But Van Luhn is again like German

1013
00:48:02.039 --> 00:48:05.239
<v Speaker 3>for me, really really exciting, so excited to see what

1014
00:48:05.320 --> 00:48:08.000
<v Speaker 3>they do next year. And I think would be a

1015
00:48:08.039 --> 00:48:10.079
<v Speaker 3>great B side pick in a lot of years. But

1016
00:48:10.280 --> 00:48:13.920
<v Speaker 3>it just it happens occasionally, like maybe once or twice

1017
00:48:14.199 --> 00:48:19.199
<v Speaker 3>where Nate you get one right, and I think cam

1018
00:48:19.239 --> 00:48:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Wesson was your one last year that you got right

1019
00:48:22.639 --> 00:48:25.079
<v Speaker 3>and is the guy that I want to highlight again.

1020
00:48:25.239 --> 00:48:28.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna piggyback on that one. Co sign on

1021
00:48:28.960 --> 00:48:32.400
<v Speaker 3>German like great pick. Totally agree he's I think he's

1022
00:48:32.440 --> 00:48:34.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be good and I hope they use him well.

1023
00:48:34.119 --> 00:48:36.719
<v Speaker 3>Van Luhn is my like like kind of B sides

1024
00:48:36.760 --> 00:48:39.079
<v Speaker 3>B side, you know that I think he could he

1025
00:48:39.119 --> 00:48:41.559
<v Speaker 3>could pop off a bit next year. He keeps going

1026
00:48:41.559 --> 00:48:44.079
<v Speaker 3>on the developmental trajectory that I think he is. I'm

1027
00:48:44.079 --> 00:48:46.519
<v Speaker 3>gonna double tap your guy from last year and think

1028
00:48:46.559 --> 00:48:50.119
<v Speaker 3>that this was just a great pick Weston. For those

1029
00:48:50.119 --> 00:48:53.079
<v Speaker 3>that don't remember, he was a mid round pick. I

1030
00:48:53.119 --> 00:48:56.079
<v Speaker 3>think like eighth round out of Michigan. If I recall

1031
00:48:56.480 --> 00:49:00.320
<v Speaker 3>you had liked his like aggressive pound the zone kind

1032
00:49:00.360 --> 00:49:03.880
<v Speaker 3>of approach and pitchability and execution that he thought that

1033
00:49:03.880 --> 00:49:06.960
<v Speaker 3>that was like playing above where people were valuing him

1034
00:49:07.159 --> 00:49:10.559
<v Speaker 3>last year and hi a last year where he spent

1035
00:49:10.639 --> 00:49:13.800
<v Speaker 3>a good chunk of the year. He was quite successful

1036
00:49:14.039 --> 00:49:17.119
<v Speaker 3>and fifteen point one percent swinging strike rate induced a

1037
00:49:17.159 --> 00:49:19.960
<v Speaker 3>bunch of ground balls pitched to a two six eight er.

1038
00:49:20.400 --> 00:49:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a good call then and then

1039
00:49:22.679 --> 00:49:25.760
<v Speaker 3>he just did that but better and at higher levels

1040
00:49:25.800 --> 00:49:28.719
<v Speaker 3>this year. Weston's another one of these guys that he's

1041
00:49:28.760 --> 00:49:32.960
<v Speaker 3>a low slot slinging righty like. His motion is really fun.

1042
00:49:33.079 --> 00:49:36.079
<v Speaker 3>He almost gun slings it from the hip like he

1043
00:49:36.480 --> 00:49:39.159
<v Speaker 3>separates his hands and then his right hand where the

1044
00:49:39.199 --> 00:49:41.039
<v Speaker 3>ball is is just hanging out by his hip and

1045
00:49:41.079 --> 00:49:43.719
<v Speaker 3>then just whips out and around and he gets great

1046
00:49:43.920 --> 00:49:47.440
<v Speaker 3>sinc on his fastball and change up the slider is

1047
00:49:47.480 --> 00:49:50.519
<v Speaker 3>really nasty. He keeps everything on the ground. He got

1048
00:49:50.559 --> 00:49:53.840
<v Speaker 3>fifty seven percent ground balls in Higa this year, and

1049
00:49:53.880 --> 00:49:56.639
<v Speaker 3>then in a larger sample it fell to forty five

1050
00:49:56.719 --> 00:49:59.719
<v Speaker 3>percent at double A, and he did start to give

1051
00:49:59.800 --> 00:50:03.960
<v Speaker 3>up few homers, but still he was limiting walks. The

1052
00:50:04.199 --> 00:50:07.920
<v Speaker 3>babip was pretty low. He threw a good number of innings,

1053
00:50:07.920 --> 00:50:10.599
<v Speaker 3>like he almost got one hundred and ten innings on

1054
00:50:10.639 --> 00:50:13.119
<v Speaker 3>the air, which I also love, like starting to build

1055
00:50:13.159 --> 00:50:16.079
<v Speaker 3>that starter's workload. And he was another one that as

1056
00:50:16.119 --> 00:50:19.280
<v Speaker 3>he went through starts, he kept up the stuff like

1057
00:50:19.719 --> 00:50:22.519
<v Speaker 3>there was no drop off, unlike some other guys who

1058
00:50:22.559 --> 00:50:25.320
<v Speaker 3>as they go through the outing they'll change things up.

1059
00:50:25.400 --> 00:50:27.239
<v Speaker 3>What I like about Weston is that he does the

1060
00:50:27.280 --> 00:50:29.599
<v Speaker 3>same thing over and over and over again, and guys

1061
00:50:29.679 --> 00:50:32.559
<v Speaker 3>can't adjust. To me, that tells me something about the

1062
00:50:32.599 --> 00:50:35.519
<v Speaker 3>stuff that Like, he just keeps sinking that fastball underneath

1063
00:50:35.599 --> 00:50:37.800
<v Speaker 3>righty's hands and they keep grounding it out. He keeps

1064
00:50:37.840 --> 00:50:40.559
<v Speaker 3>throwing the slider down and into lefties and they whiff.

1065
00:50:40.760 --> 00:50:43.440
<v Speaker 3>It's like they know what's coming and they still can't

1066
00:50:43.440 --> 00:50:45.920
<v Speaker 3>do anything about it. And I also love his kind

1067
00:50:45.960 --> 00:50:47.840
<v Speaker 3>of like demeanor and the way that he like is

1068
00:50:47.880 --> 00:50:49.960
<v Speaker 3>a bulldog out there on that He's like, I know

1069
00:50:50.079 --> 00:50:51.719
<v Speaker 3>that you're not going to hit this stuff hard. I

1070
00:50:51.800 --> 00:50:53.840
<v Speaker 3>know you're not going to get me. And he really

1071
00:50:53.920 --> 00:50:56.440
<v Speaker 3>has to miss a spot I feel like to get got.

1072
00:50:56.719 --> 00:50:59.119
<v Speaker 3>I saw him give up a home run early in

1073
00:50:59.199 --> 00:51:02.280
<v Speaker 3>one outing where he hung a slider into a lefty.

1074
00:51:02.519 --> 00:51:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Same guy later in the game struck him out on

1075
00:51:05.639 --> 00:51:08.119
<v Speaker 3>a slider that was actually executed where he wanted it.

1076
00:51:08.199 --> 00:51:10.039
<v Speaker 3>You could see him just get fired up about it,

1077
00:51:10.360 --> 00:51:13.119
<v Speaker 3>like he buried it down and in one two left

1078
00:51:13.119 --> 00:51:15.480
<v Speaker 3>he swung over it and you know, same pitch that

1079
00:51:15.599 --> 00:51:17.519
<v Speaker 3>he had hit out when he left it up, but

1080
00:51:17.639 --> 00:51:19.840
<v Speaker 3>he like, I'm going right back to that same pitch.

1081
00:51:20.039 --> 00:51:23.199
<v Speaker 3>I just executed it badly, execute it well, strikeout. So

1082
00:51:23.440 --> 00:51:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Kim Weston, I think he's really really good and for

1083
00:51:26.920 --> 00:51:30.039
<v Speaker 3>what it's worth. Steamer projects him as a three eight

1084
00:51:30.159 --> 00:51:34.239
<v Speaker 3>six er guy in the majors next year. Now they're

1085
00:51:34.280 --> 00:51:38.360
<v Speaker 3>projecting him as that as a reliever, so take that

1086
00:51:38.480 --> 00:51:41.840
<v Speaker 3>with some some Usually when they do kind of the

1087
00:51:41.880 --> 00:51:44.280
<v Speaker 3>lower projections, or if they don't project you, quote unquote

1088
00:51:44.280 --> 00:51:46.920
<v Speaker 3>as a starter, the eer comes down because you know,

1089
00:51:47.119 --> 00:51:49.639
<v Speaker 3>shorter outings and all that stuff plays up. But that

1090
00:51:49.760 --> 00:51:52.199
<v Speaker 3>is still really really good. There are not a lot

1091
00:51:52.199 --> 00:51:55.840
<v Speaker 3>of even reliever types. They get sub four projections when

1092
00:51:55.880 --> 00:51:59.239
<v Speaker 3>you haven't sniffed triple A yet, let alone the major leagues.

1093
00:51:59.440 --> 00:52:03.119
<v Speaker 3>So that tells me that the computers are also seeing

1094
00:52:03.440 --> 00:52:06.760
<v Speaker 3>that what he has been doing not only looks sustainable,

1095
00:52:06.920 --> 00:52:10.159
<v Speaker 3>but it looks like it's gonna play at the higher levels.

1096
00:52:10.199 --> 00:52:12.760
<v Speaker 3>So I don't always use that as a as a barometer,

1097
00:52:12.960 --> 00:52:15.880
<v Speaker 3>but I do like it as a as a sanity

1098
00:52:15.960 --> 00:52:18.119
<v Speaker 3>check one way or another. And that's like a big outlier.

1099
00:52:18.239 --> 00:52:21.119
<v Speaker 3>That's a really really impressive projection. So I think they're

1100
00:52:21.119 --> 00:52:23.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna keep letting him start, though I know they did

1101
00:52:23.039 --> 00:52:25.239
<v Speaker 3>some of the piggybacking with west End this year as well,

1102
00:52:25.280 --> 00:52:27.519
<v Speaker 3>but it was still usually you know, four or five

1103
00:52:27.559 --> 00:52:30.880
<v Speaker 3>inning outings when he was piggybacking in so I think

1104
00:52:30.880 --> 00:52:32.119
<v Speaker 3>they're going to keep letting him start.

1105
00:52:32.199 --> 00:52:34.960
<v Speaker 2>This is pretty much par for the course in their system,

1106
00:52:35.039 --> 00:52:37.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what everybody's doing.

1107
00:52:37.360 --> 00:52:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Also because they just have a lot of arms to

1108
00:52:39.440 --> 00:52:41.920
<v Speaker 3>go around. I mean, this system is deep and good.

1109
00:52:42.039 --> 00:52:43.239
<v Speaker 3>There are so many good arms.

1110
00:52:43.360 --> 00:52:45.199
<v Speaker 2>I know there's like maybe not a lot of name

1111
00:52:45.320 --> 00:52:47.760
<v Speaker 2>value in the dynasty world here, but this is legit,

1112
00:52:47.800 --> 00:52:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and I.

1113
00:52:47.960 --> 00:52:50.599
<v Speaker 3>Think there should be. We've talked about like six names

1114
00:52:50.599 --> 00:52:52.840
<v Speaker 3>in here that I would take over. I don't know

1115
00:52:52.920 --> 00:52:57.000
<v Speaker 3>anybody in the Boston system, including the pretty boys, like

1116
00:52:57.079 --> 00:53:00.559
<v Speaker 3>you can have loose parless, you can have your I Manegro,

1117
00:53:00.719 --> 00:53:03.199
<v Speaker 3>you can have all those pretty boy arms, like I

1118
00:53:03.239 --> 00:53:05.840
<v Speaker 3>don't care. I want all these guys in Baltimore system.

1119
00:53:05.920 --> 00:53:08.159
<v Speaker 2>Do you think it's because they're like piggybacking that it

1120
00:53:08.320 --> 00:53:10.920
<v Speaker 2>just like kind of goes under the radar for a

1121
00:53:10.960 --> 00:53:13.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of dynasty folks. It might, it might, It doesn't

1122
00:53:13.719 --> 00:53:16.360
<v Speaker 2>really like great well to like different.

1123
00:53:16.920 --> 00:53:20.320
<v Speaker 3>They're also not spending like side draft capitals, you know,

1124
00:53:20.360 --> 00:53:22.559
<v Speaker 3>but they're also not spending like high draft capital. Like

1125
00:53:22.599 --> 00:53:24.199
<v Speaker 3>most of the guys that we've talked about are all

1126
00:53:24.239 --> 00:53:27.800
<v Speaker 3>mid or late rounders, and I think that people, especially

1127
00:53:28.119 --> 00:53:32.400
<v Speaker 3>post fypds, they hang on to that first rounder because

1128
00:53:32.400 --> 00:53:35.079
<v Speaker 3>they were a first rounder for so long. And I

1129
00:53:35.079 --> 00:53:38.599
<v Speaker 3>think we know pretty fast in Pro Bowl. We get

1130
00:53:38.679 --> 00:53:42.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot more useful information almost right away when guy's debut,

1131
00:53:42.719 --> 00:53:44.920
<v Speaker 3>and like sometimes that's in the next.

1132
00:53:44.960 --> 00:53:50.239
<v Speaker 6>Is right, Bitsko is still rastered more than all these guys. Yeah,

1133
00:53:50.320 --> 00:53:53.480
<v Speaker 6>you know Criminal for example, a year ago and this

1134
00:53:53.760 --> 00:53:56.840
<v Speaker 6>was even I know there are twenty twenty three class

1135
00:53:56.840 --> 00:53:59.760
<v Speaker 6>for pitching seemed like a pretty dang good class and

1136
00:54:00.159 --> 00:54:03.079
<v Speaker 6>we were just starting to see them a year ago now,

1137
00:54:03.119 --> 00:54:05.480
<v Speaker 6>but even even before that kind of felt like it

1138
00:54:05.519 --> 00:54:08.400
<v Speaker 6>was very underrated and there was a slew of talent

1139
00:54:08.519 --> 00:54:11.280
<v Speaker 6>here and guys that thought could pop up, we thought

1140
00:54:11.280 --> 00:54:14.000
<v Speaker 6>could pop up. So yeah, the Orioles pitching, and I

1141
00:54:14.039 --> 00:54:16.039
<v Speaker 6>know in the discord and stuff, people are starting to

1142
00:54:16.039 --> 00:54:18.079
<v Speaker 6>talk about it a little bit more and maybe it

1143
00:54:18.119 --> 00:54:22.199
<v Speaker 6>won't be quite as unloved a year from now. But

1144
00:54:22.360 --> 00:54:25.119
<v Speaker 6>you want some b side arms, check out the Orioles. Man,

1145
00:54:25.159 --> 00:54:28.360
<v Speaker 6>There's there's some of the best least rostered starting pitching

1146
00:54:28.400 --> 00:54:29.360
<v Speaker 6>prospects out there.

1147
00:54:29.400 --> 00:54:32.039
<v Speaker 2>I think. Yeah, all right, the bat side, Matt Batside,

1148
00:54:32.039 --> 00:54:34.079
<v Speaker 2>I thought there was some like you said before, I

1149
00:54:34.119 --> 00:54:36.440
<v Speaker 2>think there were several different ways you could go at

1150
00:54:36.440 --> 00:54:39.920
<v Speaker 2>this roster percentage, but I landed on a first year

1151
00:54:39.920 --> 00:54:42.880
<v Speaker 2>player guy that I liked the brief looks of quite

1152
00:54:42.920 --> 00:54:43.920
<v Speaker 2>a bit and interesting.

1153
00:54:44.039 --> 00:54:45.760
<v Speaker 3>What were some of the other guys that you were

1154
00:54:45.920 --> 00:54:46.840
<v Speaker 3>that you were looking at, like.

1155
00:54:47.000 --> 00:54:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Edwin Amparo, Aaron Estrada, Tavy and Josenberger, Edri compos and

1156
00:54:52.719 --> 00:54:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Miguel Rodriguez were my final my finalist here, and I

1157
00:54:57.000 --> 00:55:00.519
<v Speaker 2>was I just listened to the BA guys review the

1158
00:55:00.599 --> 00:55:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Orioles draft just today yesterday, and they were talking about

1159
00:55:05.079 --> 00:55:06.800
<v Speaker 2>my guy here, so that makes me feel good. But

1160
00:55:06.840 --> 00:55:08.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with their third round pick from this year

1161
00:55:08.679 --> 00:55:12.400
<v Speaker 2>out of USC, Austin excuse me, Austin Overn. I don't

1162
00:55:12.400 --> 00:55:15.119
<v Speaker 2>know if you're familiar. Kind of fits. I think a

1163
00:55:15.159 --> 00:55:16.960
<v Speaker 2>search that they've been on. I think they're kind of

1164
00:55:17.000 --> 00:55:19.440
<v Speaker 2>looking for a speedy center fielder type, you know, and

1165
00:55:19.480 --> 00:55:22.039
<v Speaker 2>I think he very much fits that profile. I don't

1166
00:55:22.079 --> 00:55:24.280
<v Speaker 2>know where he might sit right now in the pecking

1167
00:55:24.400 --> 00:55:27.079
<v Speaker 2>order in their system for that profile. But a former

1168
00:55:27.639 --> 00:55:29.920
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver they were saying today. I didn't know that

1169
00:55:30.000 --> 00:55:32.599
<v Speaker 2>until I listened to the BA guys at USC at

1170
00:55:32.639 --> 00:55:35.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty one years old lefty listed at six foot that

1171
00:55:36.000 --> 00:55:38.519
<v Speaker 2>might be a little generous. I don't know. Pro debut

1172
00:55:38.880 --> 00:55:41.719
<v Speaker 2>was only twenty one games, fifteen in a BL and

1173
00:55:41.920 --> 00:55:44.760
<v Speaker 2>six in High A, but I thought he was pretty impressive.

1174
00:55:45.159 --> 00:55:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Walked sixteen point one percent of the time, struck out

1175
00:55:48.039 --> 00:55:51.119
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven percent of the time two eighty three, ninety eight,

1176
00:55:51.280 --> 00:55:53.760
<v Speaker 2>four sixty seven, hit a home run. I don't think

1177
00:55:53.800 --> 00:55:56.039
<v Speaker 2>he's like a big power guy, but I think he

1178
00:55:56.159 --> 00:55:58.079
<v Speaker 2>is a guy might hit the right shapes to hit

1179
00:55:58.119 --> 00:56:01.320
<v Speaker 2>some home runs and has enough in there. Stole sixteen

1180
00:56:01.360 --> 00:56:04.559
<v Speaker 2>bags in twenty one games. Granted it's in the lowers,

1181
00:56:04.599 --> 00:56:07.000
<v Speaker 2>but I think speed is going to be a part

1182
00:56:07.039 --> 00:56:10.239
<v Speaker 2>of his game. Good enough for one forty six WRC

1183
00:56:10.480 --> 00:56:13.199
<v Speaker 2>plus in Hi A, pulled the ball forty one percent

1184
00:56:13.239 --> 00:56:16.199
<v Speaker 2>of the time sixteen point seven percent ground ball rate

1185
00:56:16.280 --> 00:56:19.000
<v Speaker 2>in his small sample size in Hi A. But uh yeah,

1186
00:56:19.119 --> 00:56:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, man, Austin Overn, Maybe you could be

1187
00:56:21.800 --> 00:56:24.639
<v Speaker 2>a center fielder for them relatively soon. I don't know.

1188
00:56:24.880 --> 00:56:27.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's a tough tough place to break in,

1189
00:56:27.639 --> 00:56:30.840
<v Speaker 2>but I kind of the third round picks don't tend

1190
00:56:30.840 --> 00:56:33.440
<v Speaker 2>to be very popular in first year player drafts.

1191
00:56:33.679 --> 00:56:37.280
<v Speaker 3>US soon interesting interesting. Well, you know, I think he's

1192
00:56:37.320 --> 00:56:40.320
<v Speaker 3>going to have a hard time leaprogging my B side

1193
00:56:40.320 --> 00:56:43.760
<v Speaker 3>pick of enriy K Bradfield junior from last year, who

1194
00:56:43.960 --> 00:56:47.880
<v Speaker 3>is speedy centerfield plus defense and one of the most

1195
00:56:47.920 --> 00:56:50.679
<v Speaker 3>prolific and effective base deelers in the miners and he

1196
00:56:51.360 --> 00:56:53.519
<v Speaker 3>I think I was a little worried this year with

1197
00:56:53.559 --> 00:56:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Bradfield that the K rate was ticking up, but he

1198
00:56:56.599 --> 00:56:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I think got that under control. It's still a plus.

1199
00:56:59.480 --> 00:57:03.079
<v Speaker 3>It's not elite, but it's plus at fifteen percent, so

1200
00:57:03.119 --> 00:57:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that could play, especially that he takes a

1201
00:57:05.440 --> 00:57:08.159
<v Speaker 3>walk too, so gives himself a lot of chances to steal.

1202
00:57:08.199 --> 00:57:10.480
<v Speaker 3>And he actually hit some homers this year four homers

1203
00:57:10.800 --> 00:57:14.840
<v Speaker 3>hit five doubles in eighteen or five triples rather in

1204
00:57:14.960 --> 00:57:17.159
<v Speaker 3>eighteen doubles two so Bradfield.

1205
00:57:16.719 --> 00:57:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Still were any of those inside the park home runs?

1206
00:57:19.719 --> 00:57:21.639
<v Speaker 3>I think there was at least one, but he did

1207
00:57:21.679 --> 00:57:25.199
<v Speaker 3>leave the yard over the fence a couple of times.

1208
00:57:25.960 --> 00:57:29.119
<v Speaker 3>My guy this year, I'm actually quite excited about one

1209
00:57:29.119 --> 00:57:31.639
<v Speaker 3>of these ones that I think it's kind of a

1210
00:57:31.679 --> 00:57:36.199
<v Speaker 3>slow burn watching him, and is one where the numbers

1211
00:57:36.360 --> 00:57:39.920
<v Speaker 3>might be a touch ahead of like the data, like

1212
00:57:39.960 --> 00:57:42.519
<v Speaker 3>the stack cast and some of the EV data, but

1213
00:57:42.760 --> 00:57:47.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with Aaron Estrada this year. Yeah, he's one percent,

1214
00:57:47.639 --> 00:57:48.920
<v Speaker 3>I think when I looked.

1215
00:57:49.199 --> 00:57:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I use one percent on September twenty seven.

1216
00:57:52.039 --> 00:57:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, and just slashed two eighty six, three fifty six,

1217
00:57:56.480 --> 00:58:02.199
<v Speaker 3>four sixteen, nineteen doubles, five triples, nine homers, thirty nine steals,

1218
00:58:02.320 --> 00:58:05.400
<v Speaker 3>eight point two percent walk rate, sixteen percent strikeout rate.

1219
00:58:05.599 --> 00:58:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Good for a one twenty six WRC plus end of

1220
00:58:09.000 --> 00:58:11.800
<v Speaker 3>the year at high A, but most of the year

1221
00:58:11.920 --> 00:58:12.840
<v Speaker 3>in loway.

1222
00:58:12.960 --> 00:58:13.280
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

1223
00:58:13.360 --> 00:58:16.159
<v Speaker 3>The thing about Estrata is that he's five to eight.

1224
00:58:16.400 --> 00:58:20.360
<v Speaker 3>So you know, short boy short King is prime B

1225
00:58:20.519 --> 00:58:24.000
<v Speaker 3>side hunting territory and he's listed at one forty two

1226
00:58:24.360 --> 00:58:27.159
<v Speaker 3>on fan grafts. Now, I think he's a little bit

1227
00:58:27.199 --> 00:58:30.519
<v Speaker 3>taller and definitely bigger than this. Now that might have

1228
00:58:30.599 --> 00:58:33.079
<v Speaker 3>been his reported height and weight when he was signed

1229
00:58:33.079 --> 00:58:36.280
<v Speaker 3>out of Venezuela a couple of years ago as a

1230
00:58:36.320 --> 00:58:38.760
<v Speaker 3>seventeen year old in the DSL. So I think he's

1231
00:58:38.800 --> 00:58:40.960
<v Speaker 3>a little bit bigger than this. Like he's still on

1232
00:58:41.039 --> 00:58:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the smaller side, but looks athletic, which he good runner,

1233
00:58:45.079 --> 00:58:47.679
<v Speaker 3>not a great base stealer, you know, watching his steals

1234
00:58:47.719 --> 00:58:49.800
<v Speaker 3>like a lot of them are close, or he picks

1235
00:58:49.840 --> 00:58:52.119
<v Speaker 3>some wrong times to go, but he's like I think,

1236
00:58:52.159 --> 00:58:54.320
<v Speaker 3>working on that. You know, he did still thirty nine

1237
00:58:54.360 --> 00:58:56.760
<v Speaker 3>bags this year, but I think there's some power there

1238
00:58:57.039 --> 00:59:00.280
<v Speaker 3>that is a little bit surprising given the small frame.

1239
00:59:00.559 --> 00:59:03.039
<v Speaker 3>So that's something that I think could tick up. We

1240
00:59:03.119 --> 00:59:06.480
<v Speaker 3>might see fifteen or twenty homers next year, which would

1241
00:59:06.519 --> 00:59:08.679
<v Speaker 3>be really interesting. And he's one of those guys that

1242
00:59:08.679 --> 00:59:12.280
<v Speaker 3>it's the whole package put together is what makes him interesting.

1243
00:59:12.599 --> 00:59:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I like his swing. I think he puts it on

1244
00:59:14.480 --> 00:59:16.559
<v Speaker 3>the ground a touch too much, but I think that

1245
00:59:16.639 --> 00:59:20.519
<v Speaker 3>the swing still looks really really nice. He's balanced on

1246
00:59:20.599 --> 00:59:23.079
<v Speaker 3>both sides of the plate. He's a switch hitter, balance

1247
00:59:23.159 --> 00:59:25.719
<v Speaker 3>from both sides. I think he's a better from the

1248
00:59:25.800 --> 00:59:28.239
<v Speaker 3>left kind of guy, but still good from the right.

1249
00:59:28.400 --> 00:59:33.719
<v Speaker 3>The overall approach, the overall package, to me, is one

1250
00:59:33.760 --> 00:59:36.719
<v Speaker 3>that it gets underappreciated, right. It's one of those ones

1251
00:59:36.760 --> 00:59:38.280
<v Speaker 3>that it's going to be kind of the sum of

1252
00:59:38.320 --> 00:59:41.159
<v Speaker 3>the parts profile, but one that I think is really

1253
00:59:41.199 --> 00:59:45.119
<v Speaker 3>really good. And I'm not alone in this Steamer Again,

1254
00:59:45.320 --> 00:59:48.159
<v Speaker 3>I know I just mentioned this, but it's also fun

1255
00:59:48.239 --> 00:59:52.159
<v Speaker 3>to look at steamer projections for young minor leaguers because

1256
00:59:52.599 --> 00:59:55.920
<v Speaker 3>they take just the data that they have access to

1257
00:59:56.280 --> 00:59:59.679
<v Speaker 3>and say, what would this guy hit in the major leagues.

1258
01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Also removes a lot of the bias things like where

1259
01:00:02.800 --> 01:00:05.760
<v Speaker 3>was he taken in the draft, or what's his scouting report?

1260
01:00:05.880 --> 01:00:08.079
<v Speaker 3>Or how tall is he? Like those things don't play

1261
01:00:08.079 --> 01:00:11.239
<v Speaker 3>into their algorithm. I don't think last I checked. And

1262
01:00:11.280 --> 01:00:13.440
<v Speaker 3>so then you get to stack guys up pretty interestingly.

1263
01:00:13.639 --> 01:00:16.480
<v Speaker 3>So I looked at every guy who had yet to

1264
01:00:16.519 --> 01:00:19.639
<v Speaker 3>debut in the majors, which you know, for nineteen year olds,

1265
01:00:19.679 --> 01:00:22.599
<v Speaker 3>there aren't any this year. Quick quiz nate, who's number

1266
01:00:22.599 --> 01:00:25.760
<v Speaker 3>one on this list nineteen years old? Who's the best

1267
01:00:25.800 --> 01:00:28.199
<v Speaker 3>hitter according to Steamer as a nineteen year old, best

1268
01:00:28.280 --> 01:00:30.960
<v Speaker 3>nineteen year old he's in this system?

1269
01:00:31.159 --> 01:00:35.079
<v Speaker 2>Oh uh, Basallo Biseo, sorry say.

1270
01:00:35.320 --> 01:00:38.760
<v Speaker 3>He's number one by an absolute metric. Shit ton the

1271
01:00:38.920 --> 01:00:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Seo is going to be an absolute monster in the

1272
01:00:41.400 --> 01:00:43.400
<v Speaker 3>major leagues. Like that guy, I mean, if you can

1273
01:00:43.440 --> 01:00:45.519
<v Speaker 3>acquire him, I think there's a good chance that he's

1274
01:00:45.559 --> 01:00:49.800
<v Speaker 3>the best hitter period in the minor leagues by by

1275
01:00:49.960 --> 01:00:54.159
<v Speaker 3>potentially a lot. Biseos is very very impressive. Number two

1276
01:00:54.199 --> 01:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>and three are guys that I have definitely hated on

1277
01:00:57.320 --> 01:00:59.679
<v Speaker 3>in the past. Walker Jenkins and Jus Way to Paula,

1278
01:00:59.760 --> 01:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>both because they've been very young, have succeeded in the

1279
01:01:03.519 --> 01:01:05.719
<v Speaker 3>challenges that they've faced and have made it up to

1280
01:01:05.760 --> 01:01:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the upper minors. So that helps. And the fourth guy

1281
01:01:08.480 --> 01:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>is actually another one that I've been a little skeptical of,

1282
01:01:10.719 --> 01:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>largely because I don't think he's having a ton of success,

1283
01:01:13.880 --> 01:01:16.679
<v Speaker 3>but they keep pushing him up high. In Nelson Rada,

1284
01:01:16.760 --> 01:01:20.760
<v Speaker 3>so he's fourth and Aaron Estrada is fifth. And considering that,

1285
01:01:21.039 --> 01:01:23.639
<v Speaker 3>unlike Rada, it's not like he's got shoved up into

1286
01:01:23.679 --> 01:01:26.880
<v Speaker 3>double A this year. He's been at you know, advanced

1287
01:01:26.960 --> 01:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>levels for his age as a nineteen year old. Making

1288
01:01:29.519 --> 01:01:31.960
<v Speaker 3>up to HYA is good. That's a tough challenge and

1289
01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>he's held his own there. But that means that Aerin

1290
01:01:34.320 --> 01:01:38.079
<v Speaker 3>Astrada is ahead of pretty boys like Max Clark, Colt Emerson,

1291
01:01:38.199 --> 01:01:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Ralphie Velaskez, Jefferson, Rojas is a here hope at Chedrie Vargas, Hansel,

1292
01:01:42.719 --> 01:01:46.599
<v Speaker 3>Luis Robert Klas, George Lombard Junior like and these are

1293
01:01:46.639 --> 01:01:48.360
<v Speaker 3>the good nineteen year olds, these are the ones that

1294
01:01:48.440 --> 01:01:51.960
<v Speaker 3>have like done something, and and our plant with Jason Churio,

1295
01:01:52.119 --> 01:01:54.400
<v Speaker 3>he's just ahead of him. This is not the end

1296
01:01:54.440 --> 01:01:57.559
<v Speaker 3>all be all. There's huge wide ara bars around this

1297
01:01:57.639 --> 01:02:00.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of projection. And I don't use this is like

1298
01:02:00.880 --> 01:02:03.679
<v Speaker 3>this is who's better than who when slicing these things up,

1299
01:02:03.800 --> 01:02:08.000
<v Speaker 3>but it is a really strong reminder that age matters

1300
01:02:08.039 --> 01:02:10.239
<v Speaker 3>a lot, and when someone is kind of holding their

1301
01:02:10.280 --> 01:02:13.639
<v Speaker 3>own at a level that is way above their paygrade,

1302
01:02:13.800 --> 01:02:16.679
<v Speaker 3>like like they're playing against way older guys, we really

1303
01:02:16.719 --> 01:02:20.800
<v Speaker 3>should wait that pretty heavily and suggests to me that

1304
01:02:20.920 --> 01:02:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Aeron Estrada is borderline top one hundred overall prospect right now,

1305
01:02:25.360 --> 01:02:28.760
<v Speaker 3>and nobody thinks he's that good. So I think Estrata

1306
01:02:28.960 --> 01:02:32.039
<v Speaker 3>is one that you should try and acquire quietly, Like

1307
01:02:32.199 --> 01:02:34.079
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to make him the centerpiece of a deal,

1308
01:02:34.119 --> 01:02:36.320
<v Speaker 3>but like if you can find something interesting for the

1309
01:02:36.360 --> 01:02:38.559
<v Speaker 3>owner that has Estrata or pick him up for free.

1310
01:02:38.639 --> 01:02:41.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean he's a one percenter, so that I think

1311
01:02:41.239 --> 01:02:44.239
<v Speaker 3>he has got a chance to be a outperform Max

1312
01:02:44.280 --> 01:02:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Clark right like, and Max Clark is quote unquote a

1313
01:02:47.800 --> 01:02:50.400
<v Speaker 3>great player, but could could return you better value than

1314
01:02:50.760 --> 01:02:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Max Clark as they rise up the levels. So hop

1315
01:02:53.519 --> 01:02:56.599
<v Speaker 3>on the erin astrata train. I'm super excited about this

1316
01:02:56.920 --> 01:03:00.480
<v Speaker 3>some of all the parts player visually it checks out

1317
01:03:00.519 --> 01:03:04.400
<v Speaker 3>for me. I think the statistical performance has been quietly

1318
01:03:04.639 --> 01:03:06.880
<v Speaker 3>very impressive, and I'm excited to see what he can

1319
01:03:06.880 --> 01:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>do next year.

1320
01:03:07.400 --> 01:03:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Right On, I actually was rostering this strata or a

1321
01:03:09.719 --> 01:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>good chunk of this year in a few leagues, but

1322
01:03:11.880 --> 01:03:13.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of towards the end of the year moved along

1323
01:03:13.960 --> 01:03:16.639
<v Speaker 2>for a more further advanced pitcher. I think probably in

1324
01:03:16.719 --> 01:03:19.199
<v Speaker 2>most cases at the top of my shortlist, I think

1325
01:03:19.239 --> 01:03:21.000
<v Speaker 2>he was going to be my pick until I came

1326
01:03:21.039 --> 01:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>across Over. And now maybe I was thinking about this

1327
01:03:24.519 --> 01:03:27.119
<v Speaker 2>stuff too much, but I was thinking about the stature,

1328
01:03:27.360 --> 01:03:29.920
<v Speaker 2>and I was thinking about the ground ball percentage, and

1329
01:03:29.960 --> 01:03:32.079
<v Speaker 2>then I was just watching over and I was like, yeah,

1330
01:03:32.119 --> 01:03:34.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe there's like just some more impact here that I

1331
01:03:34.400 --> 01:03:37.840
<v Speaker 2>can feel safe about, which I think was the deciding

1332
01:03:37.840 --> 01:03:40.239
<v Speaker 2>factor for me. But thinking about how you know, the

1333
01:03:40.239 --> 01:03:42.920
<v Speaker 2>way that you put it, like, maybe I was understelling

1334
01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:45.119
<v Speaker 2>him a little bit, and maybe I shouldn't have dropped

1335
01:03:45.239 --> 01:03:47.679
<v Speaker 2>right on Aeron Estrada. I like it, But was it

1336
01:03:47.719 --> 01:03:49.719
<v Speaker 2>a tough call for you in this system? Were there

1337
01:03:49.719 --> 01:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>other guys that were there was this pretty easy.

1338
01:03:52.199 --> 01:03:54.199
<v Speaker 3>On the hitter side, this was pretty easy. I mean,

1339
01:03:54.199 --> 01:03:56.639
<v Speaker 3>there's some other guys that I think are are interesting

1340
01:03:56.800 --> 01:04:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and a guy that I've long flirted with in the

1341
01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore system actually just got popped in the minor league section,

1342
01:04:04.159 --> 01:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>John Rhodes. I think we might have talked about him before.

1343
01:04:06.920 --> 01:04:09.480
<v Speaker 3>He had a pretty bad year, but he's someone that

1344
01:04:09.480 --> 01:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I've been pretty intrigued by some of the skills in

1345
01:04:12.519 --> 01:04:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the past, and I don't know, the Dodgers aren't stupid

1346
01:04:15.599 --> 01:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>and they took him, so yeah, I think that's.

1347
01:04:18.079 --> 01:04:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Doosenberger in his fifty steels was kind of interesting to

1348
01:04:22.320 --> 01:04:22.679
<v Speaker 2>me too.

1349
01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I watched a favorite of Josenburger too. He had a

1350
01:04:25.360 --> 01:04:28.159
<v Speaker 3>good year. I think he's really interesting. Again, I love

1351
01:04:28.239 --> 01:04:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the plate discipline combo of an above average walk rate

1352
01:04:30.960 --> 01:04:35.239
<v Speaker 3>and a better than average strikeout rate. So Josenberger's he

1353
01:04:35.360 --> 01:04:37.840
<v Speaker 3>is a good one. That's definitely a good shout And

1354
01:04:38.119 --> 01:04:41.199
<v Speaker 3>if it were not for Estrada, Josenberger might have been

1355
01:04:41.360 --> 01:04:41.880
<v Speaker 3>a good pick.

1356
01:04:44.440 --> 01:04:48.639
<v Speaker 2>Matt. The Toronto Blue Jays looking at their arms, Ricky

1357
01:04:48.639 --> 01:04:54.199
<v Speaker 2>Titaman's still most popular fifty six percent two arms. Yeah right,

1358
01:04:54.320 --> 01:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that's really unfortunate too. I like Tituman, Jake Bloss who

1359
01:04:58.079 --> 01:05:02.280
<v Speaker 2>they got from Houston, right m h fifteen percent, Brandon

1360
01:05:02.440 --> 01:05:08.239
<v Speaker 2>Barrierra fifteen percent, Adam Maco five percent, Landon Marudis three percent,

1361
01:05:08.360 --> 01:05:11.599
<v Speaker 2>prey Yasavage there what first round pick? Second round pick

1362
01:05:11.639 --> 01:05:14.239
<v Speaker 2>this year? Is that three percent already? And then I

1363
01:05:14.280 --> 01:05:17.119
<v Speaker 2>don't know some two percenters that are meh? And that

1364
01:05:17.239 --> 01:05:19.159
<v Speaker 2>was and that's about it. Your guy from last year,

1365
01:05:19.239 --> 01:05:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Lazaro Estrada, thought he might get picked today in the

1366
01:05:21.559 --> 01:05:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Rule five, but didn't. I was still at zero percent.

1367
01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:26.920
<v Speaker 2>You and I like him a bit, and I ended

1368
01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:30.199
<v Speaker 2>up landing on another first year player, are Matt.

1369
01:05:30.199 --> 01:05:31.880
<v Speaker 3>You're going aheady on the first year player guys?

1370
01:05:31.920 --> 01:05:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess the three of them tonight. I don't

1371
01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:36.360
<v Speaker 2>know if I don't know how many I've taken overall

1372
01:05:36.559 --> 01:05:38.559
<v Speaker 2>on the arm side, it doesn't feel like as many

1373
01:05:38.599 --> 01:05:41.480
<v Speaker 2>as last year. AnyWho I'm going with Colby Holcombe. I

1374
01:05:41.519 --> 01:05:43.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you watched him at all. I don't

1375
01:05:43.440 --> 01:05:46.519
<v Speaker 2>think I did. There wasn't a ton fifteen innings. After

1376
01:05:46.719 --> 01:05:50.519
<v Speaker 2>getting drafted twenty one years old, Righty listed at six six,

1377
01:05:50.800 --> 01:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>good strong, big frame. They drafted him out of Mississippi

1378
01:05:53.800 --> 01:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>State this is the second Mississippi State What are they?

1379
01:05:56.039 --> 01:05:58.519
<v Speaker 2>The Bulldogs and I talked about tonight. He was the

1380
01:05:58.599 --> 01:06:01.159
<v Speaker 2>ninth round pick, signed for one hundred and ninety eight K.

1381
01:06:01.400 --> 01:06:06.360
<v Speaker 2>His college career, Matt was pretty unremarkable, I think. But

1382
01:06:06.400 --> 01:06:09.639
<v Speaker 2>he only had like fifty eight relief innings for Mississippi

1383
01:06:09.639 --> 01:06:12.199
<v Speaker 2>State over the last two years, and they weren't very productive.

1384
01:06:12.280 --> 01:06:14.159
<v Speaker 2>Numbers weren't very good, but I know he had a

1385
01:06:14.159 --> 01:06:17.119
<v Speaker 2>really good cape his last year. There is some savant

1386
01:06:17.199 --> 01:06:19.239
<v Speaker 2>stuff right because he was in the Florida State League.

1387
01:06:19.480 --> 01:06:21.880
<v Speaker 2>So looking at that stuff, here's a four seam fastball

1388
01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that averaged ninety three point one, but he can get

1389
01:06:25.880 --> 01:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>it up there higher than that when he wants to.

1390
01:06:27.960 --> 01:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>He'll reach back at ninety five ninety six. I know

1391
01:06:30.480 --> 01:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>there was reports that I don't know if this is

1392
01:06:32.360 --> 01:06:34.320
<v Speaker 2>while he was in college or on the cape, but

1393
01:06:34.440 --> 01:06:37.639
<v Speaker 2>he can like touch ninety nine. The four seam sinker

1394
01:06:37.719 --> 01:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>game I thought was pretty interesting with him, Like he

1395
01:06:40.440 --> 01:06:42.719
<v Speaker 2>mixed those two up, and I thought he like good

1396
01:06:42.760 --> 01:06:45.280
<v Speaker 2>timing when he chose to throw, you know, was good

1397
01:06:45.320 --> 01:06:48.760
<v Speaker 2>at deciding which one to throw. There's a slider, there's

1398
01:06:48.760 --> 01:06:51.519
<v Speaker 2>a curveball, there's a cutter. And there's a change up.

1399
01:06:51.639 --> 01:06:53.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he threw a ton of change ups,

1400
01:06:53.760 --> 01:06:56.079
<v Speaker 2>but it's in there. I thought the slider looked pretty decent,

1401
01:06:56.119 --> 01:06:59.079
<v Speaker 2>but you know, maybe now he's a bigger frame. I

1402
01:06:59.079 --> 01:07:01.960
<v Speaker 2>have no idea what like the extension is that he gets.

1403
01:07:02.039 --> 01:07:04.519
<v Speaker 2>I kind of imagine it's probably decent. Maybe there's a

1404
01:07:04.559 --> 01:07:08.039
<v Speaker 2>little bit like Johnny right hander ish to him, something

1405
01:07:08.079 --> 01:07:10.599
<v Speaker 2>like he's less funky than a lot of a lot

1406
01:07:10.599 --> 01:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>of our arm picks this year. I just liked the

1407
01:07:13.400 --> 01:07:16.280
<v Speaker 2>little looks of him, like, and you know, the debut

1408
01:07:16.360 --> 01:07:19.280
<v Speaker 2>was pretty good production wise, one point a d r

1409
01:07:19.360 --> 01:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>a one point one to three whip Now he just

1410
01:07:21.360 --> 01:07:24.639
<v Speaker 2>struck out under twenty percent and walked almost twelve percent,

1411
01:07:24.679 --> 01:07:26.239
<v Speaker 2>so you don't love to see that. But he didn't

1412
01:07:26.239 --> 01:07:28.679
<v Speaker 2>strike me as a guy maybe like the secondary game,

1413
01:07:28.679 --> 01:07:32.000
<v Speaker 2>but I thought the fastball commands he's like a potentially

1414
01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:35.079
<v Speaker 2>like a three fastball guy was pretty good. So I

1415
01:07:35.079 --> 01:07:37.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Obviously the blue Jay saw something in him

1416
01:07:37.360 --> 01:07:39.920
<v Speaker 2>here wanted to take him second day, and I could

1417
01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:41.639
<v Speaker 2>kind of see it. I don't know, man, I was

1418
01:07:41.719 --> 01:07:43.960
<v Speaker 2>just enjoying my looks. I thought it was good mix

1419
01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>of stuff and pitchability. Big, strong frame. I don't know.

1420
01:07:48.519 --> 01:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>This is why I landed on Kobe Holcom nice.

1421
01:07:51.119 --> 01:07:53.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it sounds like a decent dart throw. I mean

1422
01:07:53.679 --> 01:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I didn't love the arms in the system. I still

1423
01:07:56.000 --> 01:07:59.679
<v Speaker 3>think lazarro Strada is my favorite picture in their system period.

1424
01:08:00.039 --> 01:08:04.039
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Adam Mako comes back and is good again. I

1425
01:08:04.119 --> 01:08:06.400
<v Speaker 3>liked him when he was with the Mariners, but I'm

1426
01:08:06.480 --> 01:08:09.039
<v Speaker 3>not a teetaman guy. I think he's a reliever if

1427
01:08:09.039 --> 01:08:11.880
<v Speaker 3>he ever can stay healthy enough. And I wasn't a

1428
01:08:11.880 --> 01:08:13.519
<v Speaker 3>big fan of the rest of the arms in the

1429
01:08:13.599 --> 01:08:16.319
<v Speaker 3>system other than Estrata, who I think had a really

1430
01:08:16.399 --> 01:08:18.439
<v Speaker 3>nice double A, and I'm excited to see what he

1431
01:08:18.479 --> 01:08:21.159
<v Speaker 3>can develop into next year. I don't like the guy

1432
01:08:21.159 --> 01:08:24.399
<v Speaker 3>that I'm picking, really like. He's a bottom five maybe

1433
01:08:24.520 --> 01:08:27.319
<v Speaker 3>armed for me in the system, but he's near to

1434
01:08:27.319 --> 01:08:30.279
<v Speaker 3>the bigs. It's Trenton Wallace. He's spent most of the

1435
01:08:30.319 --> 01:08:33.119
<v Speaker 3>year in triple A. The stuff is like not even

1436
01:08:33.520 --> 01:08:36.039
<v Speaker 3>stuff that I'm going to defend. You know, it's eighty nine,

1437
01:08:36.079 --> 01:08:38.600
<v Speaker 3>but it's not like special shapes or anything. He can

1438
01:08:38.640 --> 01:08:41.159
<v Speaker 3>spin it. Okay, so he still struck out twenty six

1439
01:08:41.159 --> 01:08:43.600
<v Speaker 3>point five percent of batters, but he has to nibble

1440
01:08:43.760 --> 01:08:46.199
<v Speaker 3>quite a lot to do that. So I don't think

1441
01:08:46.239 --> 01:08:49.560
<v Speaker 3>the performance was all that impressive. And he's seems just

1442
01:08:49.600 --> 01:08:53.199
<v Speaker 3>like really depth arm material to me, or a long

1443
01:08:53.520 --> 01:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>swingman role, eat innings kind of thing. But this is

1444
01:08:56.920 --> 01:08:59.920
<v Speaker 3>not a strong recommendation by any stretch to the imagination.

1445
01:09:00.319 --> 01:09:01.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he's that good.

1446
01:09:01.479 --> 01:09:03.319
<v Speaker 2>I agree there wasn't a lot of other than a

1447
01:09:03.399 --> 01:09:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Strata who was still zero percent. I wasn't really taken

1448
01:09:06.760 --> 01:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>by the many of my looks here. There was a

1449
01:09:08.680 --> 01:09:11.920
<v Speaker 2>teenager Luis Torres that there was a few looks of

1450
01:09:12.079 --> 01:09:14.720
<v Speaker 2>in single A. But I still like to holk him better.

1451
01:09:14.840 --> 01:09:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Cool but the bats, yeah, yeah, yeah, some fun ones here.

1452
01:09:18.880 --> 01:09:21.079
<v Speaker 2>That's where it's at. I think r J Shrek might

1453
01:09:21.119 --> 01:09:24.279
<v Speaker 2>be my number one beside that this year came over.

1454
01:09:24.359 --> 01:09:26.239
<v Speaker 2>I was going to get that what's that. I was

1455
01:09:26.279 --> 01:09:28.279
<v Speaker 2>going to guess that, yeah, that's that, and that you're

1456
01:09:28.319 --> 01:09:29.159
<v Speaker 2>not going with Shrek.

1457
01:09:29.359 --> 01:09:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I almost did, And as I'll say, I think that

1458
01:09:33.600 --> 01:09:35.960
<v Speaker 3>this is the smart pick. This is a this is

1459
01:09:36.039 --> 01:09:40.319
<v Speaker 3>a reversal of fortune here, a reversal of roles, because

1460
01:09:40.319 --> 01:09:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that Shrek is high probability, good hitting big

1461
01:09:44.840 --> 01:09:47.920
<v Speaker 3>leaguer like that. That is is going to be pretty good.

1462
01:09:47.920 --> 01:09:50.279
<v Speaker 3>But I think my guy is a moonshot chance.

1463
01:09:50.359 --> 01:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, look at us. Yeah, switching roles here

1464
01:09:52.880 --> 01:09:54.399
<v Speaker 2>a bit, but yeah, I'm going to go with Shrek,

1465
01:09:54.800 --> 01:09:58.079
<v Speaker 2>twenty three year old outfielder lefty listed at six to one.

1466
01:09:58.239 --> 01:10:00.399
<v Speaker 2>He was the ninth well, he was the Mayriorner ninth

1467
01:10:00.439 --> 01:10:03.640
<v Speaker 2>round pick out of Andy in twenty twenty three. What trade? Oh,

1468
01:10:03.760 --> 01:10:06.079
<v Speaker 2>justin Turner? Right? Yeah, that was just straight up Trek

1469
01:10:06.119 --> 01:10:07.159
<v Speaker 2>for Turner, Right.

1470
01:10:07.119 --> 01:10:07.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that's right?

1471
01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, Oh, how do you feel about that

1472
01:10:10.880 --> 01:10:11.800
<v Speaker 2>as a Mariners fan?

1473
01:10:12.039 --> 01:10:16.159
<v Speaker 3>Look, Jerry's constantly trying to trade from his mid round

1474
01:10:16.239 --> 01:10:19.079
<v Speaker 3>picks that hit to get a little bit of help

1475
01:10:19.119 --> 01:10:21.439
<v Speaker 3>for the big league squad. Turner did help the big

1476
01:10:21.520 --> 01:10:24.800
<v Speaker 3>league squad. I don't think that this is a trade

1477
01:10:24.800 --> 01:10:28.199
<v Speaker 3>that they're gonna, like, really regret in the long term

1478
01:10:28.239 --> 01:10:30.560
<v Speaker 3>for reasons that we'll we'll talk about. But I do

1479
01:10:30.640 --> 01:10:33.920
<v Speaker 3>think that it's gonna hurt when Trek hits the ground

1480
01:10:33.960 --> 01:10:35.880
<v Speaker 3>running in the bigs as a hitter.

1481
01:10:36.039 --> 01:10:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And you know, after I landed on Trek mid

1482
01:10:38.840 --> 01:10:40.439
<v Speaker 2>video and stuff like, I got hit up by a

1483
01:10:40.439 --> 01:10:43.000
<v Speaker 2>few people that were just like, hey, I think Trek's

1484
01:10:43.079 --> 01:10:45.199
<v Speaker 2>really a dude, and these are like, you know, more

1485
01:10:45.279 --> 01:10:47.920
<v Speaker 2>like data guys. So take that for whatever it's worth.

1486
01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:50.319
<v Speaker 2>But but he spent most of the year in Everett, right,

1487
01:10:50.439 --> 01:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>seventy eight games there, yeah, forty four played appearances. Then, yeah,

1488
01:10:53.800 --> 01:10:55.439
<v Speaker 2>he hit like twelve home runs. And this is a

1489
01:10:55.439 --> 01:10:57.239
<v Speaker 2>guy that I think as an amateur, I don't think

1490
01:10:57.359 --> 01:10:59.119
<v Speaker 2>home runs were really like a big part of it.

1491
01:10:59.159 --> 01:11:01.199
<v Speaker 2>So you're like, yeah, you know, this guy's an Everett.

1492
01:11:01.279 --> 01:11:04.199
<v Speaker 2>You know that ridiculously small porch. So maybe some of

1493
01:11:04.239 --> 01:11:06.239
<v Speaker 2>that is is a bit bloom, but you kind of

1494
01:11:06.399 --> 01:11:09.760
<v Speaker 2>continue to hit home runs even when he moved up well, no,

1495
01:11:09.760 --> 01:11:12.279
<v Speaker 2>now with Seattle, but he hit five with what New

1496
01:11:12.279 --> 01:11:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Hampshire right in one hundred and fourteen played appearances. Well,

1497
01:11:15.760 --> 01:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>this is a guy that total on the year walked

1498
01:11:18.039 --> 01:11:21.000
<v Speaker 2>fifteen point seven percent. Now, and that was thirteen point

1499
01:11:21.079 --> 01:11:24.479
<v Speaker 2>five percent, and combining both his double A stops struck

1500
01:11:24.479 --> 01:11:27.000
<v Speaker 2>out just a little bit more sixteen point five percent.

1501
01:11:27.079 --> 01:11:29.640
<v Speaker 2>It was twenty three percent in double A on the

1502
01:11:29.720 --> 01:11:33.079
<v Speaker 2>year slash two fifty one, three eighty eight, four sixty

1503
01:11:33.119 --> 01:11:35.600
<v Speaker 2>two with at two eleven ISO and that was on

1504
01:11:35.680 --> 01:11:37.840
<v Speaker 2>a two seventy four babbit's good enough for a one

1505
01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:40.399
<v Speaker 2>forty two WRC plus. Like we talked about, I think

1506
01:11:40.520 --> 01:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>he kind of maximizes his home run potential with his

1507
01:11:43.640 --> 01:11:44.199
<v Speaker 2>bad boss.

1508
01:11:45.079 --> 01:11:46.840
<v Speaker 3>I was going to talk about this, Like you watch

1509
01:11:46.960 --> 01:11:51.399
<v Speaker 3>him play, his superpower is the barrel control and the

1510
01:11:51.479 --> 01:11:54.319
<v Speaker 3>launch angle control. Like he is a poster boy for

1511
01:11:54.800 --> 01:11:58.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to lift this particular pitch and I'm trying

1512
01:11:58.800 --> 01:12:01.359
<v Speaker 3>to hit this pitch on a love I'm like, he

1513
01:12:01.399 --> 01:12:04.680
<v Speaker 3>does a really really good job manipulating the barrel that way.

1514
01:12:04.640 --> 01:12:06.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's kind of a cool story. I think he

1515
01:12:06.600 --> 01:12:10.039
<v Speaker 2>started off as a walk on at Duke before transferring.

1516
01:12:10.119 --> 01:12:13.199
<v Speaker 2>I did notice the splits aren't the greatest, so maybe

1517
01:12:13.199 --> 01:12:16.039
<v Speaker 2>there's some platoon stuff to think about there. It's like

1518
01:12:16.159 --> 01:12:20.199
<v Speaker 2>six hundred in August after the trade, first month in

1519
01:12:20.239 --> 01:12:22.279
<v Speaker 2>the Eastern League, and I don't know as far as

1520
01:12:22.319 --> 01:12:24.319
<v Speaker 2>this sort of goes, maybe like a little bit of

1521
01:12:24.359 --> 01:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>a tweener, Like I don't know, is he does he

1522
01:12:26.640 --> 01:12:30.359
<v Speaker 2>lack impact for like the corner outfield life, but is

1523
01:12:30.399 --> 01:12:33.840
<v Speaker 2>he like really a center fielder. I don't know. I

1524
01:12:33.880 --> 01:12:34.560
<v Speaker 2>think he only had it.

1525
01:12:34.800 --> 01:12:37.960
<v Speaker 3>That's my that's my like real world take on this

1526
01:12:38.119 --> 01:12:41.319
<v Speaker 3>is that he probably moves to the corner. So maybe

1527
01:12:41.319 --> 01:12:44.960
<v Speaker 3>he's a decent left fielder and he I don't think

1528
01:12:44.960 --> 01:12:46.760
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be like a twenty five homer back.

1529
01:12:46.800 --> 01:12:49.479
<v Speaker 3>He might he actually might get to that in some seasons,

1530
01:12:49.479 --> 01:12:51.439
<v Speaker 3>like if he gets a good long run because he

1531
01:12:51.520 --> 01:12:53.840
<v Speaker 3>hit so many fly balls. It's just one of the

1532
01:12:53.840 --> 01:12:57.239
<v Speaker 3>things that I think makes him a pretty interesting guy.

1533
01:12:57.600 --> 01:13:00.239
<v Speaker 3>But it's it's it'll be tough for him to do,

1534
01:13:00.319 --> 01:13:02.319
<v Speaker 3>so you know, he's really going to have to really

1535
01:13:02.359 --> 01:13:03.720
<v Speaker 3>going to have to hit. And I don't think that's

1536
01:13:03.760 --> 01:13:06.039
<v Speaker 3>like his power baseline. But he's a guy that his

1537
01:13:06.159 --> 01:13:10.399
<v Speaker 3>game power is I think two grades above his raw.

1538
01:13:10.560 --> 01:13:13.600
<v Speaker 3>He just is so good at manipulating the barrel that

1539
01:13:13.880 --> 01:13:16.479
<v Speaker 3>he's going to get to all the power that he's got.

1540
01:13:16.600 --> 01:13:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they had not that this like is a measurement

1541
01:13:19.840 --> 01:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of how good you are defensively necessarily, but two airs

1542
01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:25.159
<v Speaker 2>on the season, and one of those was in his

1543
01:13:25.319 --> 01:13:28.039
<v Speaker 2>very first game. But I think he was primarily what

1544
01:13:28.079 --> 01:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>was he primarily playing center field?

1545
01:13:30.279 --> 01:13:31.800
<v Speaker 3>He played left and right the most.

1546
01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:35.039
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I just wrote I wrote down outfield, which in

1547
01:13:35.239 --> 01:13:38.279
<v Speaker 2>my language to myself just means he played all of them.

1548
01:13:39.239 --> 01:13:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, mostly and left.

1549
01:13:40.880 --> 01:13:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Then yeah, Shrek is a pretty good get for Toronto

1550
01:13:44.520 --> 01:13:48.079
<v Speaker 2>and Toronto even more so today. Just kind of gobbling

1551
01:13:48.159 --> 01:13:50.960
<v Speaker 2>up a lot of these kind of like deside ish

1552
01:13:51.239 --> 01:13:53.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of like just like guys. Then they got a

1553
01:13:53.760 --> 01:13:56.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of them, and I don't know, maybe maybe a

1554
01:13:56.720 --> 01:13:59.279
<v Speaker 2>few of them pop and produce more than they're sort

1555
01:13:59.319 --> 01:14:02.199
<v Speaker 2>of popularity in name recognition right now. But I think

1556
01:14:02.199 --> 01:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>they've made a lot of interesting trades and gobble up

1557
01:14:04.720 --> 01:14:07.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these kind of like mid tier prospects

1558
01:14:07.880 --> 01:14:09.880
<v Speaker 2>that I have the like quite a bit.

1559
01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:12.840
<v Speaker 3>And as we've seen, sometimes these mid tier prospects add

1560
01:14:12.880 --> 01:14:15.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit and turn into Spencer Horowitz, who was

1561
01:14:15.720 --> 01:14:19.119
<v Speaker 3>just like traded for an absolute crap ton and given

1562
01:14:19.119 --> 01:14:21.479
<v Speaker 3>that nobody was on him a couple of years ago.

1563
01:14:21.600 --> 01:14:23.720
<v Speaker 3>But if you keep hitting at the upper miners, and

1564
01:14:23.880 --> 01:14:26.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that the Jays have a bunch of these guys,

1565
01:14:26.960 --> 01:14:29.319
<v Speaker 3>you know, Will Wagner is another one that like he's

1566
01:14:29.399 --> 01:14:32.239
<v Speaker 3>kind of underappreciated, but I think is gonna be a

1567
01:14:32.279 --> 01:14:35.199
<v Speaker 3>good major league hitter. Alan Roden's another one. I think

1568
01:14:35.199 --> 01:14:38.079
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about who he's to me, got a lot

1569
01:14:38.079 --> 01:14:42.680
<v Speaker 3>of the like hitterish traits that I think are underappreciated,

1570
01:14:42.800 --> 01:14:45.720
<v Speaker 3>even Josh Kasevich. I think he's another one that like

1571
01:14:45.840 --> 01:14:48.600
<v Speaker 3>is kind of sneaky interesting. And you know, they acquired

1572
01:14:48.600 --> 01:14:51.840
<v Speaker 3>our boy McAdoo who kept hitting post trades. So think

1573
01:14:51.880 --> 01:14:55.159
<v Speaker 3>that there's and Panogo too. You know Panongos, as you

1574
01:14:55.239 --> 01:14:58.319
<v Speaker 3>had mentioned, he's been caught and cold last year and

1575
01:14:58.399 --> 01:15:02.000
<v Speaker 3>for you in general, but he still remained somewhat interesting

1576
01:15:02.159 --> 01:15:02.600
<v Speaker 3>as well.

1577
01:15:04.880 --> 01:15:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so who'd you end up going? Who's your moon

1578
01:15:07.640 --> 01:15:08.199
<v Speaker 2>shot here?

1579
01:15:08.479 --> 01:15:11.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? So even with me saying I liked a lot

1580
01:15:11.439 --> 01:15:13.520
<v Speaker 3>of these guys, and I think most of the guys

1581
01:15:13.520 --> 01:15:16.720
<v Speaker 3>that I just named were over our roster threshold percentage.

1582
01:15:16.960 --> 01:15:18.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm not one hundred percent on that, but I'm pretty

1583
01:15:18.760 --> 01:15:20.279
<v Speaker 3>sure that these are all guys that were like two

1584
01:15:20.399 --> 01:15:23.079
<v Speaker 3>or three percent. I'm just advocating that they're pretty interesting

1585
01:15:23.119 --> 01:15:25.840
<v Speaker 3>and folks should look at them. They've got a lot

1586
01:15:25.880 --> 01:15:29.319
<v Speaker 3>of these like league average or maybe a touch better

1587
01:15:29.520 --> 01:15:31.199
<v Speaker 3>kind of bats, but where they can to play on

1588
01:15:31.239 --> 01:15:34.239
<v Speaker 3>defense and all that kind of stuff. And I was looking.

1589
01:15:34.319 --> 01:15:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I watched quite a bit of the J's and explored

1590
01:15:36.880 --> 01:15:39.279
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of their FSL data and TRIPAA data because

1591
01:15:39.319 --> 01:15:41.760
<v Speaker 3>obviously we've got stat cast for that, and I thought

1592
01:15:41.760 --> 01:15:45.479
<v Speaker 3>they had a really interesting set of guys from the draft,

1593
01:15:45.840 --> 01:15:48.079
<v Speaker 3>one of whom was included in that him and his

1594
01:15:48.119 --> 01:15:51.199
<v Speaker 3>trade too, Nick Mitchell. I had just been watching him

1595
01:15:51.239 --> 01:15:53.840
<v Speaker 3>as I was brushing up on the Jay's system, and

1596
01:15:53.880 --> 01:15:56.079
<v Speaker 3>then when I saw that Mitchell was included in that

1597
01:15:56.199 --> 01:15:59.159
<v Speaker 3>deal for Andres him and Is, I was like, oh, yeah,

1598
01:15:59.239 --> 01:16:03.079
<v Speaker 3>I thought he was pretty interesting as well, good swing decisions.

1599
01:16:03.079 --> 01:16:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I thought his contact looked good at four homers and

1600
01:16:06.520 --> 01:16:09.800
<v Speaker 3>his hundred plate appearances stole three bags, like interesting power

1601
01:16:09.800 --> 01:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>speed and was decent at Indiana. I was like, well,

1602
01:16:12.840 --> 01:16:15.600
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of an interesting guy and a very Cleveland

1603
01:16:15.720 --> 01:16:17.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of target. And then the other guy that I

1604
01:16:17.640 --> 01:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>thought was pretty interesting, another outfielder that they drafted, Eddie

1605
01:16:20.760 --> 01:16:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Mikletty Junior. Do you watch any of him?

1606
01:16:22.880 --> 01:16:25.199
<v Speaker 2>I think so, Yeah, I got him on my list here. Yeah.

1607
01:16:25.239 --> 01:16:28.319
<v Speaker 3>He was a Virginia Tech guy again mid round, like

1608
01:16:28.439 --> 01:16:31.279
<v Speaker 3>eighth rounder out of out of Virginia Tech. He had

1609
01:16:31.600 --> 01:16:34.319
<v Speaker 3>really good walks to strikeouts, you know, it was almost

1610
01:16:34.359 --> 01:16:37.079
<v Speaker 3>one to one, popped a couple of homers. I liked

1611
01:16:37.079 --> 01:16:40.159
<v Speaker 3>a lot about his look as well, really nice left

1612
01:16:40.159 --> 01:16:42.840
<v Speaker 3>handed swing. So he's another one that I'm interested to

1613
01:16:42.880 --> 01:16:46.960
<v Speaker 3>see how it goes. But I got sucked in to

1614
01:16:47.520 --> 01:16:51.880
<v Speaker 3>another of these like super weird guys. Aaron Parker.

1615
01:16:52.359 --> 01:16:55.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he would have been he was, He would have

1616
01:16:55.159 --> 01:16:57.760
<v Speaker 2>been mine. If it wasn't, he would have nice. Nice.

1617
01:16:57.840 --> 01:17:01.439
<v Speaker 3>So they settled on those two. So Aaron Parker out

1618
01:17:01.439 --> 01:17:05.000
<v Speaker 3>of UCSB. The other catcher that I took a random

1619
01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:08.039
<v Speaker 3>ass flyer on, Brendan Durfy for San Diego.

1620
01:17:08.279 --> 01:17:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1621
01:17:08.600 --> 01:17:11.760
<v Speaker 3>So Brendan Durfy, who I like pulled out of a hat.

1622
01:17:12.000 --> 01:17:14.319
<v Speaker 3>Barely watched any of him, but it was like, ay,

1623
01:17:14.359 --> 01:17:17.760
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting in a difficult to find somebody's system. Well,

1624
01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:21.399
<v Speaker 3>big catcher out of UCSB, I'm going with Aaron Parker

1625
01:17:21.680 --> 01:17:25.520
<v Speaker 3>out of UCSB, who's a catcher who's just drafted. So

1626
01:17:25.560 --> 01:17:28.479
<v Speaker 3>the two of them were both at UCSB last year,

1627
01:17:28.760 --> 01:17:31.560
<v Speaker 3>splitting time. I looked like they shared some time and

1628
01:17:31.640 --> 01:17:35.720
<v Speaker 3>DHD and all of that. Aaron Parker had a good debut.

1629
01:17:35.880 --> 01:17:41.199
<v Speaker 3>Surface numbers were two thirty five three eighty five thirteen,

1630
01:17:41.560 --> 01:17:44.760
<v Speaker 3>good for a one fifty four WRC plus in a

1631
01:17:44.840 --> 01:17:47.079
<v Speaker 3>ball and now like college bat coming out of the

1632
01:17:47.159 --> 01:17:49.520
<v Speaker 3>draft in a ball like you expect them to do

1633
01:17:49.640 --> 01:17:53.279
<v Speaker 3>pretty decently well, and you know the warts struck out

1634
01:17:53.319 --> 01:17:56.439
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven percent of the time. That's a lot, especially

1635
01:17:56.479 --> 01:17:59.760
<v Speaker 3>for a college bat. But because it's the FSL, we've

1636
01:17:59.800 --> 01:18:03.960
<v Speaker 3>got exit Vilo data and we've also got swing decision data,

1637
01:18:04.119 --> 01:18:07.560
<v Speaker 3>and Aaron Parker is off the freakin charts on.

1638
01:18:07.600 --> 01:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Both of them. Well, when I were just looking at that,

1639
01:18:09.880 --> 01:18:11.319
<v Speaker 2>just pulled that up the other day.

1640
01:18:11.359 --> 01:18:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely nutty exit Villo. His ninetieth percentile was like one

1641
01:18:16.720 --> 01:18:21.239
<v Speaker 3>oh eight for something, which is like crazy high for anybody.

1642
01:18:21.279 --> 01:18:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's like elite big league power, Like that's

1643
01:18:24.079 --> 01:18:28.239
<v Speaker 3>that's I think in the ninetieth or ninety fifth percentile

1644
01:18:28.479 --> 01:18:31.920
<v Speaker 3>for major leaguers Like that's Roman Anthony is at that,

1645
01:18:32.119 --> 01:18:34.920
<v Speaker 3>and he also walks seventeen percent of the time. And

1646
01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:37.760
<v Speaker 3>so I started comparing him, and do you know who

1647
01:18:37.800 --> 01:18:41.239
<v Speaker 3>is like number one comparison is Emmanuel or Rodriguez because

1648
01:18:41.439 --> 01:18:44.560
<v Speaker 3>they never swing, they walk all the time, they strike out,

1649
01:18:44.680 --> 01:18:48.720
<v Speaker 3>they have poor contact and elite power. So Aaron Parker

1650
01:18:48.960 --> 01:18:52.680
<v Speaker 3>is Emmanuel Rodriguez, but just without the steals and plays catcher.

1651
01:18:52.760 --> 01:18:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I watched him a bit of catcher. It looked fine

1652
01:18:54.880 --> 01:18:57.520
<v Speaker 3>to me, nothing great, nothing awful.

1653
01:18:57.920 --> 01:19:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was wondering about that. I was wondering about

1654
01:19:01.039 --> 01:19:03.399
<v Speaker 2>about his catching ability, like which.

1655
01:19:03.279 --> 01:19:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, starts and it looks it looks fine to me.

1656
01:19:06.119 --> 01:19:08.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is there is there anything like less sticky

1657
01:19:09.039 --> 01:19:15.479
<v Speaker 2>than defensive catcher grades for prospects and opinions, so over

1658
01:19:15.560 --> 01:19:18.439
<v Speaker 2>and over, so many examples of it going both ways.

1659
01:19:18.840 --> 01:19:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you know he DHD. He DHD a lot

1660
01:19:21.880 --> 01:19:24.760
<v Speaker 3>in a ball likes basically fifty to fifty. Some of

1661
01:19:24.800 --> 01:19:26.600
<v Speaker 3>that might have been coming off a college she's in.

1662
01:19:26.720 --> 01:19:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Some of that might have just been like.

1663
01:19:28.600 --> 01:19:33.720
<v Speaker 2>You're talking, like you're talking this like short right handed yep, nasher.

1664
01:19:34.560 --> 01:19:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Yep, he's and looks like it. But he hits the

1665
01:19:39.640 --> 01:19:42.119
<v Speaker 3>ball in the air a ton, you know, thirty four

1666
01:19:42.199 --> 01:19:45.359
<v Speaker 3>percent in the air, twenty two percent line drives. He

1667
01:19:45.760 --> 01:19:48.760
<v Speaker 3>pulls the ball too. But even when he goes opo,

1668
01:19:49.039 --> 01:19:51.479
<v Speaker 3>he might leave the yard at any given moment. He

1669
01:19:51.520 --> 01:19:54.600
<v Speaker 3>had a really cool opo homer. He just like muscled

1670
01:19:54.640 --> 01:19:57.560
<v Speaker 3>out the outfielder kind of drifted back thinking he might

1671
01:19:57.560 --> 01:19:59.520
<v Speaker 3>have a play, and then it was way over the wall.

1672
01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:03.960
<v Speaker 3>It's like crazy. He has huge contact concerns, like we're

1673
01:20:03.960 --> 01:20:06.920
<v Speaker 3>talking bottom of the scale contact in both end zone

1674
01:20:07.119 --> 01:20:11.079
<v Speaker 3>and overall. The guy never fucking swings so I kind

1675
01:20:11.079 --> 01:20:12.800
<v Speaker 3>of think it's just not going to matter that much.

1676
01:20:13.159 --> 01:20:15.640
<v Speaker 3>And when he swings, he is looking to do damage.

1677
01:20:15.720 --> 01:20:18.079
<v Speaker 3>And again this thing with like short guys and oh

1678
01:20:18.119 --> 01:20:21.800
<v Speaker 3>we shouldn't like him or whatever. The dude fucking mashes.

1679
01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:24.600
<v Speaker 3>He hits the ball so hard already, that's the thing

1680
01:20:24.640 --> 01:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>you care about, that's the thing you're worried about for

1681
01:20:27.039 --> 01:20:30.119
<v Speaker 3>a short guy. Like if he showed that that is

1682
01:20:30.159 --> 01:20:33.119
<v Speaker 3>in his toolkit. I just don't think his height really

1683
01:20:33.159 --> 01:20:36.720
<v Speaker 3>matters all that much to me. So he has one

1684
01:20:36.760 --> 01:20:39.199
<v Speaker 3>big flaw, but a bunch of things that I really

1685
01:20:39.239 --> 01:20:42.600
<v Speaker 3>really like. So I'm betting on Aaron Parker and this

1686
01:20:43.199 --> 01:20:46.239
<v Speaker 3>new wave of how you hit is swing lass. I

1687
01:20:46.239 --> 01:20:48.760
<v Speaker 3>think he's on that train and when you swing and

1688
01:20:48.840 --> 01:20:51.479
<v Speaker 3>hit it, you hit it really far. So Aaron Parker's

1689
01:20:51.760 --> 01:20:54.880
<v Speaker 3>my moonshot guy. That he might be just like an

1690
01:20:54.920 --> 01:20:57.960
<v Speaker 3>absolute masher ketcher kind of guy, or he might not

1691
01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:01.239
<v Speaker 3>make enough contact and he might flame out Shrek to me,

1692
01:21:01.520 --> 01:21:05.119
<v Speaker 3>is the high high probability, great pick. Like Co signed

1693
01:21:05.159 --> 01:21:07.119
<v Speaker 3>that as well. It's a good, good B side rep.

1694
01:21:07.159 --> 01:21:09.800
<v Speaker 3>But I'm shooting the moon here and going Aaron Parker.

1695
01:21:09.960 --> 01:21:12.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm glad you picked Parker. That's cool. Yeah, Vogel

1696
01:21:12.520 --> 01:21:14.279
<v Speaker 2>hit me up. He's like, hey, the with the new

1697
01:21:14.319 --> 01:21:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Bowman Draft Baseball card release thing, He's like, who are

1698
01:21:17.600 --> 01:21:20.199
<v Speaker 2>some really cheap guys that you kind of like? And like, dude,

1699
01:21:20.239 --> 01:21:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Parker is like the cheapest hitter to take in

1700
01:21:22.920 --> 01:21:25.239
<v Speaker 2>these breaks and stuff. And I'm like, dude, Parker for

1701
01:21:25.399 --> 01:21:27.479
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine dollars or whatever it was, I'm like, dude,

1702
01:21:27.479 --> 01:21:29.800
<v Speaker 2>take him, man. But yeah, that's funny. I'm glad you

1703
01:21:29.840 --> 01:21:30.359
<v Speaker 2>went with Parker.

1704
01:21:30.359 --> 01:21:33.199
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what any of that means, but Aaron, it.

1705
01:21:33.159 --> 01:21:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Means no card collectors think that Aaron Parker is any good.

1706
01:21:36.880 --> 01:21:39.359
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, I think a lot of real life people

1707
01:21:39.359 --> 01:21:41.399
<v Speaker 3>think that too, and a lot of fantasy players think that.

1708
01:21:41.479 --> 01:21:45.520
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know, man, those are rare, rare skills.

1709
01:21:45.760 --> 01:21:50.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true, all right, Last, but not least, the

1710
01:21:51.199 --> 01:21:54.600
<v Speaker 2>evil Empire, right, that's not an empire, but the New

1711
01:21:54.680 --> 01:21:57.920
<v Speaker 2>York Yankees looking at their arm farm. Yeah, Chase Hampton

1712
01:21:58.239 --> 01:22:01.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight percent, Will Warren was twenty seven percent, Lani

1713
01:22:01.840 --> 01:22:06.399
<v Speaker 2>nineteen percent, Brack Salvage five percent, several two percenters, and

1714
01:22:06.439 --> 01:22:08.840
<v Speaker 2>then like, yeah, then us, then where we dig around

1715
01:22:08.880 --> 01:22:11.359
<v Speaker 2>one thing that's kind of interesting. Now I know their draft,

1716
01:22:11.439 --> 01:22:14.319
<v Speaker 2>they seem to like really kind of reload. They took

1717
01:22:14.600 --> 01:22:16.680
<v Speaker 2>a ton of pitchers in the first two days. I

1718
01:22:16.760 --> 01:22:19.199
<v Speaker 2>think maybe all pictures the first two days maybe a

1719
01:22:19.239 --> 01:22:21.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit older in the uppers. But I think it's

1720
01:22:21.720 --> 01:22:25.079
<v Speaker 2>just also like a lot of good, tough competition, right,

1721
01:22:25.119 --> 01:22:28.319
<v Speaker 2>tough to get developmental innings there. But I landed on

1722
01:22:28.359 --> 01:22:31.479
<v Speaker 2>a twenty twenty three undrafted free agent.

1723
01:22:31.600 --> 01:22:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Ooh, who did you go far?

1724
01:22:32.880 --> 01:22:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with Trent Sellers and he's from He's from

1725
01:22:36.720 --> 01:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State, So I didn't know if you were familiar

1726
01:22:38.680 --> 01:22:41.439
<v Speaker 2>or that I am, And I'm not even sure. I

1727
01:22:41.439 --> 01:22:43.600
<v Speaker 2>don't even know college if he was a starter or

1728
01:22:43.640 --> 01:22:45.720
<v Speaker 2>reliever of what the story was, I didn't even look.

1729
01:22:45.800 --> 01:22:48.119
<v Speaker 2>But there are some folks interested. He was one percent

1730
01:22:48.239 --> 01:22:51.399
<v Speaker 2>rostered in September. He was twenty four, almost twenty five

1731
01:22:51.520 --> 01:22:55.000
<v Speaker 2>years old. His last start, which was in High A.

1732
01:22:55.319 --> 01:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>There was a Triple A appearance at some point this year,

1733
01:22:58.800 --> 01:23:01.159
<v Speaker 2>but I think that was just a little brief deal

1734
01:23:01.239 --> 01:23:05.000
<v Speaker 2>here in High A. Thirty one games, nine starts, eighty

1735
01:23:05.039 --> 01:23:08.680
<v Speaker 2>two innings pitched. I think there was like some piggybacking

1736
01:23:08.840 --> 01:23:11.079
<v Speaker 2>going on, you know, like we talked about an undrafted

1737
01:23:11.119 --> 01:23:13.960
<v Speaker 2>free agent guy, but I think he maybe has started

1738
01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:17.279
<v Speaker 2>to maybe he graduated from that sort of status you're

1739
01:23:17.279 --> 01:23:20.239
<v Speaker 2>talking at two point zero nine ERA, A point ninety

1740
01:23:20.279 --> 01:23:23.720
<v Speaker 2>six whip, a three four five x fit, thirty point

1741
01:23:23.800 --> 01:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>three K percentage eleven and a half walk percentage. Ground

1742
01:23:27.800 --> 01:23:31.680
<v Speaker 2>balls at almost forty nine percent, was a swinging strike

1743
01:23:31.800 --> 01:23:35.159
<v Speaker 2>rate of ten point three percent according to Fangrass, through

1744
01:23:35.279 --> 01:23:38.079
<v Speaker 2>strikes at a fifty nine percent clip on the season.

1745
01:23:38.199 --> 01:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>But Matt, the way that he ended the season was

1746
01:23:42.159 --> 01:23:45.960
<v Speaker 2>what got me, got me intrigued. His last thirty nine innings,

1747
01:23:46.239 --> 01:23:48.359
<v Speaker 2>which was his last ten starts, This is when he

1748
01:23:48.800 --> 01:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>started starting point nine two ERA A point six y

1749
01:23:51.920 --> 01:23:55.439
<v Speaker 2>nine whip, thirty four percent K percentage and just a

1750
01:23:55.520 --> 01:23:59.039
<v Speaker 2>seven percent walk percentage. Through strikes at a sixty one

1751
01:23:59.079 --> 01:24:01.720
<v Speaker 2>percent clip. Still not quite the strike throwing that you

1752
01:24:01.880 --> 01:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of want to see. Fifteen pitches an inning, gave

1753
01:24:04.760 --> 01:24:06.680
<v Speaker 2>up one home run over that stretch.

1754
01:24:07.359 --> 01:24:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Pretty good, Yeah.

1755
01:24:08.800 --> 01:24:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Like not too bad. Fastball is probably ninety to ninety four.

1756
01:24:13.439 --> 01:24:15.920
<v Speaker 2>There's a sinker, I think that might be just a

1757
01:24:16.039 --> 01:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>smidge softer. There's a cutter, so kind of three fastball guy,

1758
01:24:19.720 --> 01:24:23.359
<v Speaker 2>change up and a slider, a nice firm slider at

1759
01:24:23.399 --> 01:24:26.039
<v Speaker 2>like eighty six. I think the change up, I don't know,

1760
01:24:26.159 --> 01:24:28.279
<v Speaker 2>was maybe around eighty four or something like that, but

1761
01:24:28.479 --> 01:24:32.319
<v Speaker 2>that's a good velocity differential. I'll share a video here.

1762
01:24:32.880 --> 01:24:35.000
<v Speaker 2>What did that show? I think probably an inning of

1763
01:24:35.279 --> 01:24:38.479
<v Speaker 2>his second inning of work after a leadoff walk versus

1764
01:24:38.479 --> 01:24:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Greensboro in the playoffs. So at the very end of

1765
01:24:40.960 --> 01:24:45.199
<v Speaker 2>the season, I thought he was just filthy dropping some

1766
01:24:45.239 --> 01:24:47.920
<v Speaker 2>secondaries that we were just kind of giving these guys

1767
01:24:47.920 --> 01:24:51.640
<v Speaker 2>no chance. Maybe a guy who's secondary game might be

1768
01:24:51.680 --> 01:24:54.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit stronger just as far as execution. But yeah,

1769
01:24:54.720 --> 01:24:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Trent Sellers, man, I was just really

1770
01:24:57.600 --> 01:25:01.199
<v Speaker 2>impressed with him down the stretch. Think, I don't know,

1771
01:25:01.239 --> 01:25:04.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe there might be some more opportunity this season in

1772
01:25:04.920 --> 01:25:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the uppers for a New York Yankee spec arm to

1773
01:25:08.680 --> 01:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>make some noise. And I wouldn't be surprised if Trent

1774
01:25:12.640 --> 01:25:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Sellers is one of those guys or that guy.

1775
01:25:14.720 --> 01:25:17.880
<v Speaker 3>So Sellers is a koug like me. He transferred a

1776
01:25:17.960 --> 01:25:18.560
<v Speaker 3>couple of times.

1777
01:25:18.840 --> 01:25:20.439
<v Speaker 2>He started at Washington State, he.

1778
01:25:20.399 --> 01:25:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Did, That's where I remembered him from, and he wasn't

1779
01:25:22.840 --> 01:25:26.359
<v Speaker 3>very good there. And then bounced around to a junior

1780
01:25:26.399 --> 01:25:28.960
<v Speaker 3>college and then an NAI school up here in the Northwest,

1781
01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:30.960
<v Speaker 3>and then kind of figured it out at Lewis and

1782
01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Clark and ended up at Oregon State, where he was

1783
01:25:33.479 --> 01:25:35.199
<v Speaker 3>a starter for them and had a really nice year.

1784
01:25:35.600 --> 01:25:37.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I saw him that year, but

1785
01:25:37.319 --> 01:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I remember following him a little bit. He does look

1786
01:25:39.920 --> 01:25:42.960
<v Speaker 3>like a developmental success story to me, like he wasn't

1787
01:25:42.960 --> 01:25:46.399
<v Speaker 3>this good, certainly in college and even at Oregon State

1788
01:25:46.479 --> 01:25:48.800
<v Speaker 3>when he took a step forward, I think that he

1789
01:25:49.239 --> 01:25:51.399
<v Speaker 3>has looked much better. And I do think that this

1790
01:25:51.560 --> 01:25:55.720
<v Speaker 3>is the Yankees developmental organization philosophy, that they take some

1791
01:25:55.760 --> 01:25:58.439
<v Speaker 3>of these guys that maybe have some interesting traits and

1792
01:25:58.479 --> 01:26:00.760
<v Speaker 3>then they kind of throw a lot of information at

1793
01:26:00.800 --> 01:26:03.399
<v Speaker 3>them and see what sticks and see what changes they

1794
01:26:03.399 --> 01:26:05.159
<v Speaker 3>can make. And I think that's what that's what we're

1795
01:26:05.159 --> 01:26:07.760
<v Speaker 3>seeing from Sellers, and interestingly, what we're also going to

1796
01:26:07.760 --> 01:26:08.960
<v Speaker 3>talk about with my guy Nice.

1797
01:26:09.199 --> 01:26:12.199
<v Speaker 2>Just generically speaking, I feel like watching Yankees arms over

1798
01:26:12.239 --> 01:26:15.640
<v Speaker 2>the last several years, like there's just breaking ball game

1799
01:26:15.760 --> 01:26:18.159
<v Speaker 2>that just really takes off with a lot of guys.

1800
01:26:18.399 --> 01:26:20.399
<v Speaker 2>There's I feel like them in like maybe like the

1801
01:26:20.479 --> 01:26:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Strows or maybe the two that I two systems I

1802
01:26:23.600 --> 01:26:26.640
<v Speaker 2>noticed the most that just kind of seemed to get

1803
01:26:26.680 --> 01:26:27.960
<v Speaker 2>some good spin out of guys.

1804
01:26:28.039 --> 01:26:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, Sellers is a fun developmental story and an

1805
01:26:31.920 --> 01:26:35.640
<v Speaker 3>interesting one for sure. I think my guy has a

1806
01:26:35.680 --> 01:26:40.720
<v Speaker 3>lot in common with yours. One long history in the

1807
01:26:40.760 --> 01:26:45.520
<v Speaker 3>minor or. In college, Ben Shields started out at UMass

1808
01:26:45.600 --> 01:26:50.039
<v Speaker 3>Amherst in twenty eighteen, got hurt in twenty nineteen, didn't

1809
01:26:50.079 --> 01:26:54.159
<v Speaker 3>pitch twenty twenty, covid ended the season early, pitched at

1810
01:26:54.279 --> 01:26:57.319
<v Speaker 3>UMass again in twenty twenty one, had a good year,

1811
01:26:57.600 --> 01:27:00.640
<v Speaker 3>but it was also shortened I think maybe by injury again.

1812
01:27:00.800 --> 01:27:05.079
<v Speaker 3>Then transferred to George Mason in twenty twenty two, and

1813
01:27:05.119 --> 01:27:07.279
<v Speaker 3>then played for George Mason again in twenty twenty three,

1814
01:27:07.319 --> 01:27:10.960
<v Speaker 3>So if you're counting that, six seasons in college before

1815
01:27:11.119 --> 01:27:14.000
<v Speaker 3>he finally left and he didn't get drafted, but the

1816
01:27:14.039 --> 01:27:16.359
<v Speaker 3>Yankees signed him as an undrafted free agent in like

1817
01:27:16.560 --> 01:27:19.640
<v Speaker 3>late July. I think of twenty twenty three, he had

1818
01:27:19.880 --> 01:27:23.479
<v Speaker 3>played on the Cape a couple of times, and I

1819
01:27:23.520 --> 01:27:27.920
<v Speaker 3>think done decently well in his twenty twenty two stint there,

1820
01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:30.239
<v Speaker 3>and so maybe he was on some radars from that.

1821
01:27:30.520 --> 01:27:33.479
<v Speaker 3>He was good in college. Question Mark like he was

1822
01:27:33.560 --> 01:27:37.119
<v Speaker 3>mostly a reliever in especially towards the end of his career,

1823
01:27:37.600 --> 01:27:40.159
<v Speaker 3>and went not a particularly good one at that, So

1824
01:27:40.319 --> 01:27:44.680
<v Speaker 3>like totally unremarkable college career. Yankees saw something. I read

1825
01:27:44.960 --> 01:27:47.399
<v Speaker 3>a long interview with him and his one of his

1826
01:27:47.479 --> 01:27:50.399
<v Speaker 3>pitching coaches here in pro ball, and they talked a

1827
01:27:50.399 --> 01:27:53.840
<v Speaker 3>lot about how he really absorbed a ton of information

1828
01:27:54.159 --> 01:27:56.760
<v Speaker 3>from when they drafted him, and they put him into

1829
01:27:56.800 --> 01:27:59.159
<v Speaker 3>like the development one of the developmental teams, and I

1830
01:27:59.199 --> 01:28:01.039
<v Speaker 3>think he just worked out with them a lot and

1831
01:28:01.159 --> 01:28:04.039
<v Speaker 3>was working on stuff, and they shoved him into HIA

1832
01:28:04.399 --> 01:28:07.359
<v Speaker 3>to start the year this year again in that piggybacking role.

1833
01:28:07.479 --> 01:28:09.279
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't a starter, but he was going two or

1834
01:28:09.279 --> 01:28:12.600
<v Speaker 3>three innings at a time. His first six outings, he

1835
01:28:12.680 --> 01:28:16.760
<v Speaker 3>went maybe fifteen innings something like that, two to three

1836
01:28:16.840 --> 01:28:19.560
<v Speaker 3>outings at a time, or two to three innings each outing,

1837
01:28:19.680 --> 01:28:23.319
<v Speaker 3>and struck out twenty eight walked eight point five four

1838
01:28:23.439 --> 01:28:26.840
<v Speaker 3>ERA to start your pro career, Like hard to do

1839
01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:30.079
<v Speaker 3>better than that to start, And he was clearly just

1840
01:28:30.159 --> 01:28:34.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of too much for the South Atlantic League. I mean,

1841
01:28:34.359 --> 01:28:36.880
<v Speaker 3>he was just like ripping through these guys and it

1842
01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:39.880
<v Speaker 3>kept going even when they started putting him in as

1843
01:28:39.920 --> 01:28:43.920
<v Speaker 3>a starter. So after his first six appearances in relief,

1844
01:28:44.079 --> 01:28:46.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they he started the rest of the year

1845
01:28:46.840 --> 01:28:50.119
<v Speaker 3>more or less and just kept on doing the same thing.

1846
01:28:50.479 --> 01:28:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Across all of his outings this year, he struck out

1847
01:28:54.039 --> 01:28:56.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty one point one percent of batters, walked, seven point

1848
01:28:57.000 --> 01:29:00.119
<v Speaker 3>five percent of batters three point four eight ERA and

1849
01:29:00.159 --> 01:29:03.039
<v Speaker 3>that includes a couple of like pretty big blow up

1850
01:29:03.079 --> 01:29:05.439
<v Speaker 3>outings too that I'm going to talk about because one

1851
01:29:05.439 --> 01:29:07.560
<v Speaker 3>of the things that really convinced me, like, I love

1852
01:29:07.640 --> 01:29:10.159
<v Speaker 3>that line, I love the story. I watched a bit

1853
01:29:10.159 --> 01:29:13.640
<v Speaker 3>of his low A starts and in Hudson Valley and

1854
01:29:13.680 --> 01:29:15.319
<v Speaker 3>I was like, oh, this is pretty interesting. And I

1855
01:29:15.319 --> 01:29:17.039
<v Speaker 3>watched a couple at Summerset and I was like, this

1856
01:29:17.119 --> 01:29:20.359
<v Speaker 3>looks really really quite good. But we also have a

1857
01:29:20.359 --> 01:29:23.319
<v Speaker 3>triple A start. I love the stackcast data. I got

1858
01:29:23.399 --> 01:29:27.000
<v Speaker 3>so into this guy because he in the triple A data.

1859
01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:29.640
<v Speaker 3>We only have data on a couple of his pitches.

1860
01:29:29.840 --> 01:29:32.039
<v Speaker 3>I think it was just four, and it was terrible.

1861
01:29:32.119 --> 01:29:34.399
<v Speaker 3>In the outing. It was like, uh, let me find it,

1862
01:29:34.399 --> 01:29:37.479
<v Speaker 3>because it was like it was like a miserably bad start.

1863
01:29:37.720 --> 01:29:41.399
<v Speaker 3>So they called him up for one start against the

1864
01:29:42.079 --> 01:29:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Syracuse with the Mets. Triple A affiliate, and they started him.

1865
01:29:46.439 --> 01:29:50.439
<v Speaker 3>He went one in two thirds innings seventeen batter's face,

1866
01:29:50.720 --> 01:29:54.640
<v Speaker 3>gave up eight hits, nine runs, seven earned a homer,

1867
01:29:54.840 --> 01:29:57.560
<v Speaker 3>and two walks and two hit by pitches. He got

1868
01:29:57.560 --> 01:29:59.880
<v Speaker 3>a strike out in there, though, But that's awful, right,

1869
01:30:00.479 --> 01:30:03.600
<v Speaker 3>terrible outing, And even with that outing, he's he's still

1870
01:30:03.760 --> 01:30:06.039
<v Speaker 3>his full season line was really really good. If you

1871
01:30:06.039 --> 01:30:08.800
<v Speaker 3>take that outing out, his full season line was electric

1872
01:30:08.880 --> 01:30:11.239
<v Speaker 3>because that was like the only time he was bad.

1873
01:30:11.319 --> 01:30:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Get a couple of other like four run give up starts,

1874
01:30:15.119 --> 01:30:17.560
<v Speaker 3>uh starts where he gave up four runs one or

1875
01:30:17.560 --> 01:30:19.920
<v Speaker 3>two where he gave up three, But you look across

1876
01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:22.479
<v Speaker 3>his game log, especially to end the year, it's like

1877
01:30:22.680 --> 01:30:25.680
<v Speaker 3>zero runs, two runs, one runs zero zero zero one

1878
01:30:25.840 --> 01:30:29.039
<v Speaker 3>one three one three two two two two two one,

1879
01:30:29.079 --> 01:30:31.399
<v Speaker 3>Like he's just not giving up runs in these starts.

1880
01:30:31.479 --> 01:30:35.039
<v Speaker 3>And his arsenal is so cool because he's got a sinker,

1881
01:30:35.079 --> 01:30:37.439
<v Speaker 3>which he uses a lot, a four seam fastball, which

1882
01:30:37.479 --> 01:30:40.720
<v Speaker 3>is a different shaped pitch, like clearly a different look.

1883
01:30:40.800 --> 01:30:43.600
<v Speaker 3>He has a gyro slider and a sweeper and a

1884
01:30:43.640 --> 01:30:48.079
<v Speaker 3>curveball and a splitter and he uses all of those

1885
01:30:48.119 --> 01:30:50.319
<v Speaker 3>pitches like you watch him like use you see, you know,

1886
01:30:50.359 --> 01:30:53.520
<v Speaker 3>when the catcher's calling pitches, like he's doing two finger

1887
01:30:53.680 --> 01:30:56.880
<v Speaker 3>signs to try and tell him which pitch to call,

1888
01:30:56.920 --> 01:30:58.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, so like it's not just one two three

1889
01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:01.239
<v Speaker 3>or one two three four. They're doing like the l

1890
01:31:01.520 --> 01:31:04.199
<v Speaker 3>for the four seam I think, and they were doing

1891
01:31:04.199 --> 01:31:07.880
<v Speaker 3>the spinny fastball for the two seam. They were doing

1892
01:31:07.920 --> 01:31:10.319
<v Speaker 3>like a hookham horns kind of thing for one of

1893
01:31:10.319 --> 01:31:12.039
<v Speaker 3>his other pitches. I don't even know what that one was,

1894
01:31:12.119 --> 01:31:14.560
<v Speaker 3>but like he's clearly just got like a huge arsenal

1895
01:31:14.640 --> 01:31:16.199
<v Speaker 3>and is trying all these different things.

1896
01:31:16.640 --> 01:31:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Was that the splitter, the horns.

1897
01:31:18.199 --> 01:31:19.920
<v Speaker 3>It might have been, it might have been actually a

1898
01:31:20.039 --> 01:31:24.000
<v Speaker 3>huge repertoire, and commanded them all well enough that like

1899
01:31:24.199 --> 01:31:26.800
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't walking a lot of guys. He had a

1900
01:31:26.800 --> 01:31:29.880
<v Speaker 3>couple of outings where he had four walks. Most of

1901
01:31:29.920 --> 01:31:33.079
<v Speaker 3>them were two zero or one. So he's got a

1902
01:31:33.159 --> 01:31:37.439
<v Speaker 3>deep repertoire commands it pretty well gets with. And we

1903
01:31:37.520 --> 01:31:39.800
<v Speaker 3>had this stackcast data, and so I was so curious.

1904
01:31:39.840 --> 01:31:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I watched the start first and just like watched it

1905
01:31:41.840 --> 01:31:43.760
<v Speaker 3>through you know, the inning and two thirds, and he

1906
01:31:43.880 --> 01:31:47.119
<v Speaker 3>got super unlucky. You watch it a couple of pitches

1907
01:31:47.119 --> 01:31:49.359
<v Speaker 3>that like could have gone either way. Maybe they could

1908
01:31:49.359 --> 01:31:51.159
<v Speaker 3>have challenged it. Actually, I don't know if it was

1909
01:31:51.199 --> 01:31:53.560
<v Speaker 3>a challenge there or not, but anyway that could have

1910
01:31:53.600 --> 01:31:56.199
<v Speaker 3>gone either way on like strike threes early that I

1911
01:31:56.239 --> 01:31:58.680
<v Speaker 3>thought maybe he got got screwed on a couple of

1912
01:31:59.000 --> 01:32:01.840
<v Speaker 3>weird babbit that balls just found holes like it was

1913
01:32:01.880 --> 01:32:04.720
<v Speaker 3>just a supremely unlucky start. He also didn't look faced

1914
01:32:04.760 --> 01:32:06.520
<v Speaker 3>at all. He just kept out going out there doing

1915
01:32:06.520 --> 01:32:08.880
<v Speaker 3>his thing. But we also get the data on the

1916
01:32:08.920 --> 01:32:11.560
<v Speaker 3>pitch shapes, and I was so into this guy at

1917
01:32:11.600 --> 01:32:13.279
<v Speaker 3>this point that I spent like an hour and a

1918
01:32:13.319 --> 01:32:18.159
<v Speaker 3>half recording every single pitch, the spin, the direction, the shape,

1919
01:32:18.199 --> 01:32:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the movement, and then comping this to big leaguers. Okay,

1920
01:32:21.720 --> 01:32:26.119
<v Speaker 3>so this guy, undrafted, free agent, unheralded zero percent when

1921
01:32:26.159 --> 01:32:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I looked, I don't think anybody. I'm not even sure

1922
01:32:28.640 --> 01:32:30.359
<v Speaker 3>if he's owned in any of my leagues, and I

1923
01:32:30.359 --> 01:32:33.319
<v Speaker 3>played in quite a few deep ones. But Shields fastball

1924
01:32:33.600 --> 01:32:37.560
<v Speaker 3>is almost a dead ringer for Max Freeds in terms

1925
01:32:37.600 --> 01:32:40.840
<v Speaker 3>of the run, the velocity, the release point. I think

1926
01:32:40.920 --> 01:32:43.760
<v Speaker 3>his might be huch higher than Freed's, but other than that,

1927
01:32:44.079 --> 01:32:48.199
<v Speaker 3>it looks just like Max Freed's, so that's interesting. The

1928
01:32:48.279 --> 01:32:51.920
<v Speaker 3>other fastballs that are in that same range are Scott

1929
01:32:51.960 --> 01:32:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Ferguson and Patrick Sandoval I think is close. So, like,

1930
01:32:56.720 --> 01:32:58.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, those guys are good in their own way,

1931
01:32:58.960 --> 01:33:02.039
<v Speaker 3>but like, that's a fastball, that's a major league quality fastball,

1932
01:33:02.159 --> 01:33:05.399
<v Speaker 3>right and he's averages like ninety three point six with it,

1933
01:33:05.439 --> 01:33:07.960
<v Speaker 3>which is pretty good, or maybe it's a hair below that,

1934
01:33:08.000 --> 01:33:10.159
<v Speaker 3>but it's like above ninety three for a lefty. That's

1935
01:33:10.199 --> 01:33:12.920
<v Speaker 3>pretty good. Then I looked at his slider. It was

1936
01:33:13.079 --> 01:33:15.720
<v Speaker 3>unclear in the Triple A start, which was early in

1937
01:33:15.760 --> 01:33:18.520
<v Speaker 3>the year in May, whether he was throwing the distinct

1938
01:33:18.600 --> 01:33:22.359
<v Speaker 3>sweeper and gyro. I tend to think that this was

1939
01:33:22.439 --> 01:33:25.039
<v Speaker 3>mostly the gyro slider that he was throwing and not

1940
01:33:25.159 --> 01:33:27.319
<v Speaker 3>the sweepy one that he used later on in the year.

1941
01:33:27.479 --> 01:33:32.039
<v Speaker 3>But also comps almost directly with Max Fried's in terms

1942
01:33:32.079 --> 01:33:36.199
<v Speaker 3>of velocity and movement profile horizontal and vertical. So like

1943
01:33:36.319 --> 01:33:39.039
<v Speaker 3>you've got a Max Freed starter kit, and it's not

1944
01:33:39.359 --> 01:33:41.760
<v Speaker 3>really that much of a coincidence. Maybe that they just

1945
01:33:41.920 --> 01:33:45.399
<v Speaker 3>signed the Yankees just signed Max Freed too, and Shields

1946
01:33:45.479 --> 01:33:48.680
<v Speaker 3>might have his like doppelganger there. But then he also

1947
01:33:48.760 --> 01:33:51.399
<v Speaker 3>adds a whole bunch of other pitches too. So I'm

1948
01:33:51.439 --> 01:33:53.880
<v Speaker 3>not saying that Ben Shields is better than Max Freed.

1949
01:33:53.960 --> 01:33:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Max Freed is so long track record of extremely good

1950
01:33:57.920 --> 01:34:00.640
<v Speaker 3>success in the major leagues, but I'm saying that his

1951
01:34:00.760 --> 01:34:05.800
<v Speaker 3>stuff comps almost exactly too Max freedz so Benshields dominated

1952
01:34:05.840 --> 01:34:09.359
<v Speaker 3>the minor leagues. The stuff looks just like an ACE

1953
01:34:09.600 --> 01:34:12.520
<v Speaker 3>that just got paid an absurd amount of money and

1954
01:34:12.800 --> 01:34:16.760
<v Speaker 3>he's zero percent owned, So the stuff seems there. The

1955
01:34:16.800 --> 01:34:20.079
<v Speaker 3>results are there. It came out of freaking nowhere. But

1956
01:34:20.279 --> 01:34:22.640
<v Speaker 3>like this is kind of a sound the alarm kind

1957
01:34:22.640 --> 01:34:24.520
<v Speaker 3>of thing on this guy. I don't know what else

1958
01:34:24.560 --> 01:34:27.279
<v Speaker 3>you would want to see from a B sider guy,

1959
01:34:27.439 --> 01:34:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Like he's He's probably in my top three B side

1960
01:34:30.960 --> 01:34:33.640
<v Speaker 3>arms that I'm most excited about, has a real shot

1961
01:34:33.720 --> 01:34:36.159
<v Speaker 3>to just be like the most successful out of them.

1962
01:34:36.319 --> 01:34:39.399
<v Speaker 3>The depth of the arsenal, the quality of the stuff

1963
01:34:39.439 --> 01:34:40.920
<v Speaker 3>that like, I don't know, this is the thing, Like

1964
01:34:40.960 --> 01:34:43.600
<v Speaker 3>people get hung up on the guy touching ninety nine,

1965
01:34:43.640 --> 01:34:46.239
<v Speaker 3>but like you don't care when a guy looks just

1966
01:34:46.399 --> 01:34:49.680
<v Speaker 3>like an ace, Like this stuff backball slider looks just

1967
01:34:49.720 --> 01:34:52.520
<v Speaker 3>like Max Freed, and you're like oh, but it's ninety three,

1968
01:34:52.680 --> 01:34:56.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, slider, Like come on, Like, this is why

1969
01:34:56.840 --> 01:34:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I love comps, and I think that people don't use

1970
01:34:59.600 --> 01:35:02.840
<v Speaker 3>them because either they don't know like what, they don't

1971
01:35:02.840 --> 01:35:05.760
<v Speaker 3>have that context, they don't have that the right pull

1972
01:35:05.920 --> 01:35:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the right person to compare them to, or they don't

1973
01:35:08.880 --> 01:35:11.800
<v Speaker 3>use him in the right way. And I credit Jeff Zimmermann,

1974
01:35:11.880 --> 01:35:14.479
<v Speaker 3>who writes on fangrafts a lot, like he built a

1975
01:35:14.600 --> 01:35:18.199
<v Speaker 3>tool to compare pitch types to major league pitchers to

1976
01:35:18.279 --> 01:35:20.960
<v Speaker 3>see like how similar or what are the fastballs that

1977
01:35:21.039 --> 01:35:22.720
<v Speaker 3>look like this? What are the change ups that look

1978
01:35:22.800 --> 01:35:24.880
<v Speaker 3>like this? And that's been a really helpful thing for

1979
01:35:24.920 --> 01:35:26.760
<v Speaker 3>me to help gut check when I look at a

1980
01:35:26.800 --> 01:35:29.039
<v Speaker 3>guy and have access to that kind of data, like

1981
01:35:29.239 --> 01:35:31.239
<v Speaker 3>is that pitch actually going to play? Like? How good

1982
01:35:31.319 --> 01:35:33.479
<v Speaker 3>is that? What does it look like? Was that pitch

1983
01:35:33.600 --> 01:35:36.039
<v Speaker 3>also good? For all of the data that I could

1984
01:35:36.039 --> 01:35:39.880
<v Speaker 3>find for Ben Shields, pitches, all of them comp to sliders,

1985
01:35:39.880 --> 01:35:44.279
<v Speaker 3>to fastballs, to curveballs that look really good and we

1986
01:35:44.319 --> 01:35:46.600
<v Speaker 3>would want to see that all in one pitcher. So

1987
01:35:46.880 --> 01:35:50.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm honestly as excited about Ben Shields as anybody. And

1988
01:35:51.079 --> 01:35:53.039
<v Speaker 3>that's absolutely nowhere.

1989
01:35:52.800 --> 01:35:54.840
<v Speaker 2>That's a good dig they got me more so he

1990
01:35:54.880 --> 01:35:57.680
<v Speaker 2>was third on my list here, but I was not

1991
01:35:57.800 --> 01:36:01.239
<v Speaker 2>thinking about him in this context at all. Also, that's

1992
01:36:01.319 --> 01:36:03.840
<v Speaker 2>good stuff. I just want to put a pin on

1993
01:36:03.840 --> 01:36:05.960
<v Speaker 2>one other name. I don't know if you watched any

1994
01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Allen Facundo, Kundo, I'm at Adio. Yeah.

1995
01:36:11.880 --> 01:36:13.840
<v Speaker 3>I may have watched a little bit, but I don't.

1996
01:36:14.199 --> 01:36:16.600
<v Speaker 2>He was twenty one years old, he was in single

1997
01:36:16.680 --> 01:36:20.119
<v Speaker 2>A just kind of a bigger, harder throwing lefty that

1998
01:36:20.199 --> 01:36:24.239
<v Speaker 2>I just was like into the execution and pitchability that

1999
01:36:24.319 --> 01:36:27.479
<v Speaker 2>he was showing. But I'm assuming Tommy John struck because

2000
01:36:27.479 --> 01:36:30.239
<v Speaker 2>he went on the full season in June and never

2001
01:36:30.279 --> 01:36:32.800
<v Speaker 2>saw him again. So I didn't want to like that

2002
01:36:32.920 --> 01:36:35.239
<v Speaker 2>might have been my choice here, but I just wanted

2003
01:36:35.600 --> 01:36:37.680
<v Speaker 2>to give that name a shout to see, keep an

2004
01:36:37.720 --> 01:36:39.920
<v Speaker 2>eye out when he comes back what he might look like,

2005
01:36:40.000 --> 01:36:43.039
<v Speaker 2>because I was kind of getting into Facundo too. But yeah,

2006
01:36:43.079 --> 01:36:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Ben Shields, I don't make me. You make me want

2007
01:36:45.680 --> 01:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>to go watch him again.

2008
01:36:46.720 --> 01:36:50.439
<v Speaker 3>Now, dude, I highly recommend it. It's so fun.

2009
01:36:50.680 --> 01:36:53.159
<v Speaker 2>I was into it. I didn't take a lot of notes,

2010
01:36:53.199 --> 01:36:54.520
<v Speaker 2>but he was up here.

2011
01:36:54.680 --> 01:36:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's a it's a fun look like he's

2012
01:36:57.760 --> 01:37:02.119
<v Speaker 3>He's one that really really pressed and doing it up

2013
01:37:02.159 --> 01:37:05.039
<v Speaker 3>at double A and high A from like nowhere. It

2014
01:37:05.119 --> 01:37:06.079
<v Speaker 3>was impressive stuff.

2015
01:37:06.239 --> 01:37:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm still I want to see Tyrone Nulie,

2016
01:37:09.039 --> 01:37:12.079
<v Speaker 2>my pick from last year, come back from his Timmy John.

2017
01:37:12.119 --> 01:37:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he didn't pitch at all this last year,

2018
01:37:14.840 --> 01:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>which has been my theme with the Yankees B side arms, Matt.

2019
01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I pick a guy and they have Tommy John don't

2020
01:37:19.680 --> 01:37:23.760
<v Speaker 2>even pitch. Hopefully that doesn't happen with Trent Sellers here,

2021
01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:26.640
<v Speaker 2>hopefully not. But I was I had on my short

2022
01:37:26.680 --> 01:37:29.560
<v Speaker 2>list to Gabrielle Barbosa, who I saw I got taken

2023
01:37:29.560 --> 01:37:32.840
<v Speaker 2>into the minor league portion of draft. Today, let's move

2024
01:37:32.880 --> 01:37:35.039
<v Speaker 2>to the bats man. I'll let you go first with

2025
01:37:35.119 --> 01:37:36.039
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees bats.

2026
01:37:36.359 --> 01:37:40.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, My Yankees bat is a fun one. I

2027
01:37:40.880 --> 01:37:42.520
<v Speaker 3>did like quite a few of these guys. I thought

2028
01:37:42.520 --> 01:37:45.239
<v Speaker 3>there were quite a few interesting ones that were worth

2029
01:37:45.479 --> 01:37:49.199
<v Speaker 3>looking at. You know, my boy Durbin, we have talked

2030
01:37:49.199 --> 01:37:52.279
<v Speaker 3>about ad nauseum. I'm excited for him to get a shot,

2031
01:37:52.319 --> 01:37:55.079
<v Speaker 3>and I hope he really succeeds next year. He I

2032
01:37:55.079 --> 01:37:57.520
<v Speaker 3>think could be a real fun spark plug for those

2033
01:37:57.560 --> 01:38:00.560
<v Speaker 3>boring ass Yankees and but the the bat that I

2034
01:38:00.640 --> 01:38:02.880
<v Speaker 3>lendsed on, I'm actually pretty interested in. You know, the

2035
01:38:02.960 --> 01:38:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Yankees over the past couple of years have had a

2036
01:38:04.920 --> 01:38:10.119
<v Speaker 3>real catching pipeline, Like they have developed so many catchers

2037
01:38:10.359 --> 01:38:13.079
<v Speaker 3>that have gone on to either be good or moved

2038
01:38:13.119 --> 01:38:15.760
<v Speaker 3>off the position, but are still like pretty good catchers.

2039
01:38:15.840 --> 01:38:18.279
<v Speaker 2>They got good stuff for them in trades.

2040
01:38:18.119 --> 01:38:20.079
<v Speaker 3>Or they got good stuff for them in trades exactly.

2041
01:38:20.239 --> 01:38:22.520
<v Speaker 3>And there were a couple of that I was looking

2042
01:38:22.560 --> 01:38:24.680
<v Speaker 3>at here. You know, Raphael Flores, I think he might

2043
01:38:24.720 --> 01:38:29.479
<v Speaker 3>be a touch over our roster percentages, but he was one.

2044
01:38:29.840 --> 01:38:31.800
<v Speaker 3>He was one percent, so I was looking at him too,

2045
01:38:31.880 --> 01:38:34.359
<v Speaker 3>and thought that might be an interesting one catcher. Looks

2046
01:38:34.399 --> 01:38:36.680
<v Speaker 3>like he can catch, like had some things that I

2047
01:38:36.680 --> 01:38:38.159
<v Speaker 3>really like. I watched quite a bit of him at

2048
01:38:38.159 --> 01:38:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Somerset and thought he looked pretty good.

2049
01:38:40.399 --> 01:38:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Rodriguez was also still only one percent September, which I

2050
01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:44.880
<v Speaker 2>was kind of surprised.

2051
01:38:44.960 --> 01:38:47.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's my guy. Yeah, they added him to the

2052
01:38:47.039 --> 01:38:49.359
<v Speaker 3>forty man. He's played a bunch of different positions, so

2053
01:38:49.399 --> 01:38:52.000
<v Speaker 3>again there's some of this utility here. But I watching

2054
01:38:52.079 --> 01:38:54.960
<v Speaker 3>him hit, I love it. It's so goofy. The setup

2055
01:38:55.039 --> 01:38:58.159
<v Speaker 3>he like points his left elbow directly at the pitcher

2056
01:38:58.279 --> 01:39:02.000
<v Speaker 3>in this weird ass setup. He's got like the Marcelo Zuna,

2057
01:39:02.159 --> 01:39:07.000
<v Speaker 3>like really pigeon toed leg in. But he's a huge dude,

2058
01:39:07.119 --> 01:39:09.920
<v Speaker 3>and he's when he swings all of that stuff, all

2059
01:39:09.920 --> 01:39:12.000
<v Speaker 3>of those like weird ticks that I kind of love

2060
01:39:12.079 --> 01:39:15.199
<v Speaker 3>from an asthetic perspective. When he lifts this leg, it's

2061
01:39:15.520 --> 01:39:18.199
<v Speaker 3>so smooth and he is coiled, and then his hands

2062
01:39:18.199 --> 01:39:21.319
<v Speaker 3>are so fast. He's just like so short for a

2063
01:39:21.359 --> 01:39:24.760
<v Speaker 3>pretty big guy. He's so short and direct to the ball.

2064
01:39:24.960 --> 01:39:27.800
<v Speaker 3>It's no wonder that the dude ran a fourteen point

2065
01:39:27.800 --> 01:39:31.159
<v Speaker 3>seven percent strikeout rate that is elite. That is so good.

2066
01:39:31.199 --> 01:39:33.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's not like quite Caleb Durban elite, but

2067
01:39:34.039 --> 01:39:38.000
<v Speaker 3>it is damn close. And considering that he popped ten homers,

2068
01:39:38.119 --> 01:39:41.720
<v Speaker 3>fifteen doubles, and four triples in three hundred and thirty

2069
01:39:41.760 --> 01:39:44.199
<v Speaker 3>three plate appearances this year, I think this guy is

2070
01:39:44.239 --> 01:39:48.159
<v Speaker 3>a real hitter and is like major league quality maybe

2071
01:39:48.239 --> 01:39:50.800
<v Speaker 3>right now. And if he can play catcher, which I'm

2072
01:39:50.840 --> 01:39:52.880
<v Speaker 3>not sure of. You know, they moved him around a lot,

2073
01:39:52.920 --> 01:39:55.359
<v Speaker 3>I think partly because they aren't convinced he's a good

2074
01:39:55.439 --> 01:39:58.039
<v Speaker 3>catcher and they're seeing they think his bat might be

2075
01:39:58.079 --> 01:39:59.720
<v Speaker 3>able to play, and so they're seeing, like, can he

2076
01:39:59.760 --> 01:40:02.279
<v Speaker 3>play some of these other positions. He's played some third,

2077
01:40:02.399 --> 01:40:04.560
<v Speaker 3>has a pretty good arm, he's played some first played

2078
01:40:04.560 --> 01:40:07.640
<v Speaker 3>some left. Yeah, you know, he's bounced around. But I

2079
01:40:07.680 --> 01:40:10.000
<v Speaker 3>think that the Yankees are looking at him like this

2080
01:40:10.039 --> 01:40:13.239
<v Speaker 3>guy's gonna hit. He might be a super utility or

2081
01:40:13.399 --> 01:40:17.279
<v Speaker 3>maybe maybe their catching development continues and he could be

2082
01:40:17.560 --> 01:40:20.359
<v Speaker 3>a catcher as well. So Hayes dis Rodriguez is my guy.

2083
01:40:20.439 --> 01:40:22.359
<v Speaker 3>I think he's gonna be really good. And I was

2084
01:40:22.439 --> 01:40:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I was pumped to see the Yankees take him and

2085
01:40:25.479 --> 01:40:26.239
<v Speaker 3>put him on the forty.

2086
01:40:26.319 --> 01:40:28.159
<v Speaker 2>I think I was thinking about him myself. I was

2087
01:40:28.199 --> 01:40:31.239
<v Speaker 2>also thinking about first year player Guy Brendon Jones. I

2088
01:40:31.279 --> 01:40:33.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you watch Oh yeah I did from

2089
01:40:33.640 --> 01:40:37.560
<v Speaker 2>k State. He had a nice intro. W Yeah, yeah.

2090
01:40:37.680 --> 01:40:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I just kind of decided to go with my guy.

2091
01:40:42.039 --> 01:40:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Like I was like, I'm not really sure if he's

2092
01:40:44.520 --> 01:40:47.119
<v Speaker 2>a major leaguer necessarily, but I did talk to a

2093
01:40:47.159 --> 01:40:49.800
<v Speaker 2>scout that was like, he's the kind of guy somehow,

2094
01:40:49.960 --> 01:40:52.279
<v Speaker 2>some way, we're gonna see him in the big leagues.

2095
01:40:52.439 --> 01:40:57.039
<v Speaker 2>And that's rock Regio. This dude is just so much

2096
01:40:57.079 --> 01:41:00.319
<v Speaker 2>fun to watch you scrolled, go to his MiLB dot

2097
01:41:00.319 --> 01:41:02.800
<v Speaker 2>com page, scroll down to his highlights, and it's just

2098
01:41:02.920 --> 01:41:09.680
<v Speaker 2>like one after another. He made maybe the greatest defensive

2099
01:41:09.680 --> 01:41:12.880
<v Speaker 2>play at shortstop I have ever seen. Most ridiculous play.

2100
01:41:13.079 --> 01:41:15.319
<v Speaker 2>He runs out to centerfield and his short fly ball

2101
01:41:15.439 --> 01:41:18.000
<v Speaker 2>makes the catch, falls over the centerfielder. I think he

2102
01:41:18.039 --> 01:41:20.079
<v Speaker 2>got hurt on that play too and missed some time,

2103
01:41:20.239 --> 01:41:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and then just blindly throws the ball over his head

2104
01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:24.800
<v Speaker 2>to get the guy at the second at second base

2105
01:41:24.800 --> 01:41:27.760
<v Speaker 2>who needed to tag up, like it was just ridiculous.

2106
01:41:27.920 --> 01:41:30.840
<v Speaker 2>But and there he steals home. And he's hitting walk

2107
01:41:30.880 --> 01:41:34.560
<v Speaker 2>off hits all the times, like his WPA is probably high.

2108
01:41:34.920 --> 01:41:37.239
<v Speaker 2>I feel like even though even though his you know,

2109
01:41:37.399 --> 01:41:41.039
<v Speaker 2>season stat line is is not super overwhelming here two

2110
01:41:41.119 --> 01:41:44.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, three forty nine, three ninety seven slash and

2111
01:41:44.840 --> 01:41:47.600
<v Speaker 2>high a four hundred and eighty played appearances. He was

2112
01:41:47.640 --> 01:41:50.560
<v Speaker 2>their fourth round pick out Oklahoma State in twenty twenty three.

2113
01:41:50.960 --> 01:41:53.039
<v Speaker 2>Not a real big guy who listened at five to nine,

2114
01:41:53.159 --> 01:41:56.760
<v Speaker 2>did hit eleven home runs, He did steal twenty seven bases.

2115
01:41:57.279 --> 01:42:00.199
<v Speaker 2>That was a one hundred and seventeen WRC plus and

2116
01:42:00.279 --> 01:42:04.000
<v Speaker 2>delli strikeout. You know, guy walks a lot fourteen point

2117
01:42:04.079 --> 01:42:06.760
<v Speaker 2>eight percent, struck out twenty percent. You know, you don't

2118
01:42:06.800 --> 01:42:08.960
<v Speaker 2>hate to see that. I don't know how much major

2119
01:42:09.039 --> 01:42:12.159
<v Speaker 2>league impact is necessarily in the bat. I don't even

2120
01:42:12.199 --> 01:42:15.199
<v Speaker 2>know what the realistic chances of him being a big leader.

2121
01:42:15.199 --> 01:42:18.000
<v Speaker 2>But this guy is just a gamer man and he's

2122
01:42:18.039 --> 01:42:20.880
<v Speaker 2>just like one of my favorite as a fan of baseball,

2123
01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:23.279
<v Speaker 2>just one of my favorite, if not my favorite minor

2124
01:42:23.359 --> 01:42:24.119
<v Speaker 2>leader to watch.

2125
01:42:24.319 --> 01:42:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love that pick and I love the shout

2126
01:42:26.760 --> 01:42:29.319
<v Speaker 3>to the defense too. Like these kinds of guys, Yeah,

2127
01:42:29.399 --> 01:42:31.600
<v Speaker 3>I think we're talking about they get underrated in this

2128
01:42:31.720 --> 01:42:33.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing because one, it's a lot harder for

2129
01:42:33.800 --> 01:42:36.239
<v Speaker 3>us to evaluate unless you really are watching a guy

2130
01:42:36.279 --> 01:42:38.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot, and two that doesn't show up on the

2131
01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:42.199
<v Speaker 3>stat sheet. But that's a thing that major league teams

2132
01:42:42.239 --> 01:42:45.439
<v Speaker 3>really care about. We just started with under him and.

2133
01:42:46.800 --> 01:42:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Reminds me of another one of my favorite minor leaders

2134
01:42:49.359 --> 01:42:52.760
<v Speaker 2>over the last several years, like Hunter stovall the Rockies.

2135
01:42:52.760 --> 01:42:55.960
<v Speaker 2>But I think Rigio is like a little bit more talented. Yeah,

2136
01:42:56.000 --> 01:42:57.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know, one thing I got to give the

2137
01:42:57.880 --> 01:43:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Yankees credit for is that for all the uh, you know,

2138
01:43:00.880 --> 01:43:04.199
<v Speaker 2>resources scouting and all the wise guys stuff that they

2139
01:43:04.199 --> 01:43:07.600
<v Speaker 2>put into their scouting whatever, they still make room and

2140
01:43:07.720 --> 01:43:10.520
<v Speaker 2>draft guys like this, Like they will get guys that

2141
01:43:10.600 --> 01:43:14.880
<v Speaker 2>are just gamers, many good ballplayers. They might not scream

2142
01:43:14.920 --> 01:43:17.439
<v Speaker 2>out on the spreadsheets or whatever they're looking at, but

2143
01:43:17.520 --> 01:43:19.840
<v Speaker 2>like they do value that and they do have a

2144
01:43:19.880 --> 01:43:22.680
<v Speaker 2>slew of guys that are just like fucking ballplayers, man,

2145
01:43:22.760 --> 01:43:26.319
<v Speaker 2>good baseball players, heads and just the winners. Man. I

2146
01:43:26.359 --> 01:43:28.439
<v Speaker 2>think he falls into that category for sure.

2147
01:43:28.600 --> 01:43:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like that pick. I like that shouty to

2148
01:43:32.039 --> 01:43:33.560
<v Speaker 3>end it on a couple of fun.

2149
01:43:33.399 --> 01:43:38.199
<v Speaker 2>Any rocks cheaters number, but yeah, that'll do it, I guess,

2150
01:43:38.319 --> 01:43:41.800
<v Speaker 2>huh or the al these twenty five B side calls.

2151
01:43:41.960 --> 01:43:44.239
<v Speaker 2>We didn't double up on anybody, so we had twenty

2152
01:43:44.279 --> 01:43:45.359
<v Speaker 2>guys here, huh.

2153
01:43:45.159 --> 01:43:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean we we had a few co signs

2154
01:43:47.720 --> 01:43:48.319
<v Speaker 3>I think in there.

2155
01:43:48.399 --> 01:43:50.800
<v Speaker 2>But there's there's a lot of your picks that were legit,

2156
01:43:50.880 --> 01:43:53.279
<v Speaker 2>like number two on my lists, so that that's fun.

2157
01:43:53.359 --> 01:43:55.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and the same same same of yours on mine,

2158
01:43:55.600 --> 01:43:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Like that they were right there.

2159
01:43:57.199 --> 01:44:00.840
<v Speaker 2>We have one left. We'll do the al centroll next

2160
01:44:00.880 --> 01:44:02.800
<v Speaker 2>time we record. Looking forward to that one.

2161
01:44:02.840 --> 01:44:05.479
<v Speaker 3>Some good fun guys. Yeah, that's that's a fun organ,

2162
01:44:05.840 --> 01:44:06.920
<v Speaker 3>fun fun group too.

2163
01:44:07.079 --> 01:44:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, again. I'll post videos of these guys when when

2164
01:44:10.079 --> 01:44:13.760
<v Speaker 2>this pett when this recording drops on Twitter at pitching specs,

2165
01:44:13.880 --> 01:44:15.560
<v Speaker 2>you can see some of the stuff we're trying to

2166
01:44:15.600 --> 01:44:18.960
<v Speaker 2>talk about here. Well, we'll let Chicago Farmer take us

2167
01:44:18.960 --> 01:44:21.439
<v Speaker 2>out and we'll talk to you next time. See ya.

2168
01:44:21.640 --> 01:44:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Ninety five miles an hour riding to his head.

2169
01:44:27.079 --> 01:44:28.159
<v Speaker 2>You hop it down.

2170
01:44:28.159 --> 01:44:33.119
<v Speaker 1>First with the lump bonius face, and on the very

2171
01:44:33.319 --> 01:44:37.079
<v Speaker 1>next pitch he up and stove second face.

2172
01:44:39.039 --> 01:44:49.359
<v Speaker 4>With greatst speed. He wasn't born. He had yes, uniforn
