WEBVTT

1
00:00:09.400 --> 00:00:12.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome back everyone. I'm here with Ryan. We're

2
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be discussing AI once again. We actually discussed

3
00:00:15.160 --> 00:00:18.879
<v Speaker 1>this in our pilot episode, which I believe was in November,

4
00:00:19.600 --> 00:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And obviously this is a developing story all the time.

5
00:00:22.960 --> 00:00:25.839
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot to talk about. But I guess, first off, Ryan,

6
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:29.559
<v Speaker 1>looking back on what we discussed in November, what you

7
00:00:29.600 --> 00:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>remember of it, how do you think that's worked out

8
00:00:31.960 --> 00:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>as far as where we said this was going what

9
00:00:33.960 --> 00:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to expect.

10
00:00:34.719 --> 00:00:39.119
<v Speaker 2>I think we've been vindicated so far. The hype cycle continues,

11
00:00:39.759 --> 00:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the same faces at the helm. You know, the original

12
00:00:46.359 --> 00:00:50.399
<v Speaker 2>open AI group still quarreling. Elon Musk is going at

13
00:00:50.439 --> 00:00:55.039
<v Speaker 2>it with Sam Altman on on X and you know

14
00:00:55.520 --> 00:00:59.759
<v Speaker 2>open ayes under severe pressure. But I guess we'll get

15
00:00:59.759 --> 00:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>into the numbers of it as far as we can

16
00:01:03.119 --> 00:01:07.079
<v Speaker 2>work out, because there's a huge amount of obviousigation in

17
00:01:07.120 --> 00:01:13.079
<v Speaker 2>this market. But the build out is absolutely remarkable. The

18
00:01:13.159 --> 00:01:17.879
<v Speaker 2>numbers that are being talked about, the you know, the

19
00:01:18.319 --> 00:01:22.959
<v Speaker 2>demands that is being calculated based on labor displacement. It's

20
00:01:23.000 --> 00:01:29.040
<v Speaker 2>being pitched as a battle for global supremacy between America

21
00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:34.799
<v Speaker 2>and China particularly, and you know, a new economic paradigm,

22
00:01:35.040 --> 00:01:38.719
<v Speaker 2>which Musk at least is saying we'll be work free

23
00:01:38.799 --> 00:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and abundant. So yeah, that's uh, let's get into it.

24
00:01:44.599 --> 00:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess yeah. The numbers are staggering. We went over

25
00:01:47.120 --> 00:01:48.719
<v Speaker 1>some of them the last time we spoke. I mean,

26
00:01:48.920 --> 00:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and fifty billion is the numbers. Six hundred

27
00:01:52.280 --> 00:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and thirty billion direoboats of capex that's just going to

28
00:01:55.879 --> 00:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>be spent by four companies on AI this year, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet,

29
00:02:01.760 --> 00:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Meta and obviously these numbers, you know, they just keep

30
00:02:04.799 --> 00:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>blowing up during unbelievable territory. But there's no sign of

31
00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:10.759
<v Speaker 1>it's slown down. And there's definitely more of a sense

32
00:02:10.840 --> 00:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>now of people recognizing that this is some kind of bubble.

33
00:02:14.199 --> 00:02:17.719
<v Speaker 1>But I guess the question is how does that come

34
00:02:17.759 --> 00:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to an end? Because I think a lot a lot

35
00:02:18.960 --> 00:02:22.199
<v Speaker 1>of people have a sense, okay, it's a bubble to degree,

36
00:02:22.240 --> 00:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but there is a worthwhile product there, something will come

37
00:02:24.879 --> 00:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>of it, some kind of productivity gains. We just don't

38
00:02:27.680 --> 00:02:30.439
<v Speaker 1>know how that will manifest or where the money needs

39
00:02:30.479 --> 00:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to go to benefit from that. But also last time

40
00:02:34.639 --> 00:02:38.319
<v Speaker 1>we discussed this, we talked about China, which sometimes doesn't

41
00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>get talked about so much in these discussions, and you

42
00:02:41.400 --> 00:02:45.159
<v Speaker 1>were kind of bullish on Chinese manufacturing and China's potential

43
00:02:45.199 --> 00:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to catch up, and that's suddenly something that's coming to

44
00:02:48.479 --> 00:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the fore neat. There was a couple of models released

45
00:02:50.879 --> 00:02:54.319
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of weeks from China that again

46
00:02:54.840 --> 00:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>has caused alarm in Silicon Valley because they're so close

47
00:02:58.599 --> 00:03:03.479
<v Speaker 1>to the top models being it out by entropic open Ai,

48
00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:08.039
<v Speaker 1>and the head of strategy for open Ai actually had

49
00:03:08.199 --> 00:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>an interesting post I think he made on x where

50
00:03:10.680 --> 00:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>he warned that these open source models being put out

51
00:03:14.240 --> 00:03:16.759
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese that this was going to lead to

52
00:03:17.000 --> 00:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>an era of AI communism, I think he called it,

53
00:03:21.560 --> 00:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And he was basically warning people of this terrible potential

54
00:03:25.039 --> 00:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>future where you can just access AI models for free.

55
00:03:29.120 --> 00:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure why he thought that would be such

56
00:03:31.919 --> 00:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a terrifying prospect of people, that you would be able

57
00:03:34.240 --> 00:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to access these models for free, rather than the brilliant,

58
00:03:38.360 --> 00:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>liberal capitalist future of paying a subscription to scam Altmann

59
00:03:42.840 --> 00:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to access the same tech. But apparently this to him

60
00:03:46.360 --> 00:03:51.599
<v Speaker 1>is a dangerous specter of AI communism. Interestingly enough, I

61
00:03:51.599 --> 00:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>think David Sachs, who's the AI advisor to the US

62
00:03:55.319 --> 00:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>government actually pushed back on that and warned about regulatory captures.

63
00:03:58.960 --> 00:04:02.199
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's some interesting dynamics happening there as far

64
00:04:02.240 --> 00:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>as how these tech companies now are actually going to

65
00:04:04.840 --> 00:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with this tread that you warn't a

66
00:04:07.840 --> 00:04:10.879
<v Speaker 1>bode of China coming in and eating their lunch. And

67
00:04:10.879 --> 00:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it's suddenly seemed to look more realistic.

68
00:04:13.759 --> 00:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, let's go back to the beginning of AI.

69
00:04:18.560 --> 00:04:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Twenty fifteen, Open AI is born. It's a collaboration between

70
00:04:23.720 --> 00:04:27.160
<v Speaker 2>likes of Vilo mass Musks, Sam Altman, a bunch of

71
00:04:27.160 --> 00:04:35.600
<v Speaker 2>other tech nerds, mathematicians, whatever. Twenty nineteen, that project, which

72
00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>was meant to benefit all humanity, open source AI for all,

73
00:04:39.879 --> 00:04:45.040
<v Speaker 2>becomes a private company because they realized that to scale

74
00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>this up into something brilliant, something resembling a brain, is

75
00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:53.399
<v Speaker 2>going to require a lot of computing power. And then

76
00:04:53.720 --> 00:04:58.839
<v Speaker 2>along comes in Nvidia, who historically were just a company

77
00:04:58.839 --> 00:05:01.639
<v Speaker 2>that provided graphics for gamers like me when I was

78
00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a teenager, and then became a bitcoin mining company or

79
00:05:07.879 --> 00:05:14.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, bitcoin mining compute provider. You know, the the

80
00:05:14.920 --> 00:05:18.639
<v Speaker 2>tech optimists of AI decided that they could do brilliant

81
00:05:18.720 --> 00:05:23.879
<v Speaker 2>things with GPUs, and that's you know, that's when the

82
00:05:24.000 --> 00:05:28.199
<v Speaker 2>kind of American rent seeking model was born that they

83
00:05:28.199 --> 00:05:30.959
<v Speaker 2>were going to, you know, create all these data centers,

84
00:05:31.040 --> 00:05:34.639
<v Speaker 2>create these huge clusters of compute, and then they were

85
00:05:34.639 --> 00:05:40.000
<v Speaker 2>going to sell it back to consumers enterprises after they've

86
00:05:40.120 --> 00:05:44.560
<v Speaker 2>scraped all of Western civilization by training their models on

87
00:05:45.319 --> 00:05:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Reddit and you know, every document, every pdf on the Internet.

88
00:05:51.519 --> 00:05:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Because I read it was the pinnacle of civilization.

89
00:05:54.759 --> 00:05:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, to be fair to them, they have or

90
00:05:59.399 --> 00:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>here's an exact sample, anthropic. They were actually scared of

91
00:06:05.920 --> 00:06:12.720
<v Speaker 2>copyright infringement for all the sources they effectively stole, so

92
00:06:12.800 --> 00:06:17.639
<v Speaker 2>they used their seed capital to buy millions of physical books,

93
00:06:18.160 --> 00:06:22.319
<v Speaker 2>tore them apart by removing the bindings and copy in

94
00:06:22.360 --> 00:06:27.439
<v Speaker 2>every page. So they have a phenomenal database of real

95
00:06:27.480 --> 00:06:33.319
<v Speaker 2>world books. But I think AI is bundled together in

96
00:06:33.399 --> 00:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>this kind of very vague tech optimism, and I think

97
00:06:37.399 --> 00:06:40.319
<v Speaker 2>we should separate the kind of processes that are actually

98
00:06:40.399 --> 00:06:44.439
<v Speaker 2>going on here. So you've got the LLM, which is

99
00:06:45.199 --> 00:06:51.720
<v Speaker 2>basically predicting the next word, and it happens to be

100
00:06:51.759 --> 00:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>great for coding. So you've got these two frontier labs,

101
00:06:56.839 --> 00:07:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Open AI and the spinoff of open Ai because Oltman

102
00:07:00.639 --> 00:07:05.319
<v Speaker 2>and Amedi fell out. Anthropic and Athropic is the market

103
00:07:05.399 --> 00:07:11.399
<v Speaker 2>leader encoding. You know, they you know, have basically taken

104
00:07:11.399 --> 00:07:14.839
<v Speaker 2>the software development well by storm. I think pretty much

105
00:07:14.879 --> 00:07:17.279
<v Speaker 2>everyone's using them.

106
00:07:18.040 --> 00:07:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I should point out, actually, since we last spoke, I

107
00:07:21.560 --> 00:07:24.319
<v Speaker 1>was banned by Claude. I really, I don't know if

108
00:07:24.319 --> 00:07:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I told you this, I guess not yet. So I

109
00:07:27.319 --> 00:07:29.759
<v Speaker 1>I'd only used Claude a couple of times, wasn't really

110
00:07:29.839 --> 00:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>feeling chat GPT, but so I decided to test out

111
00:07:32.560 --> 00:07:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the you know, every want to talk about who great

112
00:07:34.319 --> 00:07:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Claude is compared to chat GUPT. So I bought the

113
00:07:36.600 --> 00:07:41.279
<v Speaker 1>premium subscription. Immediately banned, and I got an email from

114
00:07:42.079 --> 00:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Claude saying that their algorithm had I forget how they

115
00:07:47.800 --> 00:07:49.639
<v Speaker 1>worded it. It was signals. That was it. That there

116
00:07:49.639 --> 00:07:53.759
<v Speaker 1>were It's algorithm had generated signals associated with me as

117
00:07:53.759 --> 00:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a user. And on the basis of this, decided that

118
00:07:57.519 --> 00:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I may be in violation of their term or I

119
00:08:00.240 --> 00:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be using their product, and banned me. And then

120
00:08:04.160 --> 00:08:06.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, centered to review human reviewed it and yes

121
00:08:06.720 --> 00:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm banned. So that was that was the extent of

122
00:08:08.759 --> 00:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the explanation. I got as there are signals associated with

123
00:08:11.959 --> 00:08:14.279
<v Speaker 1>you as a user that means you can't use Claude AI.

124
00:08:14.480 --> 00:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't. I haven't been able to experience and

125
00:08:17.759 --> 00:08:21.079
<v Speaker 1>of any of the Entropic models. But this is there's

126
00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>your future, you know. I guess I'll be cheering on

127
00:08:23.040 --> 00:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Chinese open models. I guess we're facing.

128
00:08:26.839 --> 00:08:30.040
<v Speaker 2>You're banned from vibe coding now if that was interest

129
00:08:30.079 --> 00:08:34.559
<v Speaker 2>of yours? So yeah, where to go next? Yeah, Andthropic

130
00:08:34.720 --> 00:08:37.919
<v Speaker 2>is brilliant coding every development.

131
00:08:38.200 --> 00:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>But and Tropic does seem like the most liberal of

132
00:08:41.279 --> 00:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>all these companies in terms of most the other tech

133
00:08:44.240 --> 00:08:48.879
<v Speaker 1>companies seem pretty amoral. But wasn't Entropics kind of modus

134
00:08:48.879 --> 00:08:50.759
<v Speaker 1>operando when they started out? It's like, oh, we're going

135
00:08:50.840 --> 00:08:51.919
<v Speaker 1>to be ethical AI.

136
00:08:52.080 --> 00:08:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't that kind of the Well yeah they said that,

137
00:08:54.039 --> 00:08:55.679
<v Speaker 2>but I just think it's pr no.

138
00:08:55.759 --> 00:08:58.159
<v Speaker 1>But but I'm I think maybe they're their idea of

139
00:08:58.200 --> 00:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>ethics is I thought Drew's posted something that he was

140
00:09:01.399 --> 00:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>asking what the different types of head speech laws are

141
00:09:05.000 --> 00:09:07.639
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and a Claude wouldn't tell them, you know,

142
00:09:07.799 --> 00:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>bands me, so I think, like, you know, their idea

143
00:09:10.039 --> 00:09:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of ethics is you know, even society leftism'm.

144
00:09:14.879 --> 00:09:17.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I basically think they're all in it together.

145
00:09:17.679 --> 00:09:24.399
<v Speaker 2>They have a pr mantra, and then in reality they're

146
00:09:24.480 --> 00:09:28.519
<v Speaker 2>ducing their own stock so they can cash out. So

147
00:09:29.000 --> 00:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Amadi at Davos earlier in the year, he basically announced

148
00:09:34.159 --> 00:09:36.679
<v Speaker 2>that twenty percent of the workforce was going to be

149
00:09:36.799 --> 00:09:40.799
<v Speaker 2>unemployed in a couple of years. And then he announced

150
00:09:40.879 --> 00:09:44.639
<v Speaker 2>Mithos and said this is so good. Everyone's going to

151
00:09:44.639 --> 00:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>have their cybersecurity compromise, and this could bring down the

152
00:09:47.600 --> 00:09:51.519
<v Speaker 2>world economy. So he's fallen out with Department of Defense,

153
00:09:52.200 --> 00:09:57.840
<v Speaker 2>like the American government basically hate him. They basically said

154
00:09:57.840 --> 00:10:00.759
<v Speaker 2>that there had to be severe restriction on the use

155
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:05.200
<v Speaker 2>of myth foss because it was such a risk. And

156
00:10:05.240 --> 00:10:07.639
<v Speaker 2>you've even got the likes of Alex carp A Palenteer

157
00:10:07.759 --> 00:10:10.279
<v Speaker 2>coming out and saying, this guy is a clown. He's

158
00:10:10.480 --> 00:10:13.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, scaring the voters. He's putting us in danger

159
00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>of you know, electing communists and Luddites and all this

160
00:10:17.679 --> 00:10:19.679
<v Speaker 2>kind of red scare stuff.

161
00:10:19.759 --> 00:10:23.600
<v Speaker 3>So there doesn't seem to be that.

162
00:10:23.639 --> 00:10:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Much consensus between the various oligarchs associated with AI. They're

163
00:10:28.320 --> 00:10:30.399
<v Speaker 2>all kind of feuding with each other and they're trying

164
00:10:30.399 --> 00:10:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to reduce their own stock, and you know, Sam Altman

165
00:10:35.080 --> 00:10:41.399
<v Speaker 2>says that AGI is coming. There are different, so many

166
00:10:41.399 --> 00:10:43.559
<v Speaker 2>different layers to this. And then you've also got the

167
00:10:43.639 --> 00:10:48.639
<v Speaker 2>hyperscalers who own equity in the frontier labs open Ai

168
00:10:49.360 --> 00:10:54.799
<v Speaker 2>and and Thropics, so they're incentivized for these two ipo

169
00:10:54.960 --> 00:10:59.799
<v Speaker 2>at very high evaluations. Meanwhile, there's Nvidia in the backgrounds

170
00:10:59.799 --> 00:11:02.240
<v Speaker 2>there just trying to ship out as much Compute as

171
00:11:02.240 --> 00:11:05.919
<v Speaker 2>possible to you know, all all buyers, which is basically

172
00:11:06.039 --> 00:11:11.320
<v Speaker 2>just the hyperscalers, and to keep everything afloat, they're doing

173
00:11:11.360 --> 00:11:17.279
<v Speaker 2>all these really dodgy circular finance deals, very dodgy accounting

174
00:11:17.759 --> 00:11:22.559
<v Speaker 2>where they're putting things on the revenue statements that really

175
00:11:22.559 --> 00:11:27.440
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be there, and they're hiding the debt and so

176
00:11:27.600 --> 00:11:31.639
<v Speaker 2>much is obviouscated. But if you look at the raw

177
00:11:31.720 --> 00:11:36.679
<v Speaker 2>numbers and what these companies are saying, they're basically selling

178
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:39.279
<v Speaker 2>Compute at a loss, and Thropic and open Ai are

179
00:11:39.320 --> 00:11:42.320
<v Speaker 2>selling at a loss. And you know, you've got all

180
00:11:42.320 --> 00:11:46.440
<v Speaker 2>these stories of enterprises token maxing. They're trying to get

181
00:11:46.480 --> 00:11:49.200
<v Speaker 2>productivity out their workers, they end up spending too much,

182
00:11:49.240 --> 00:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>they cancel it that happened to Uber and they're having

183
00:11:54.039 --> 00:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to go through so many rounds of raising new capital.

184
00:11:58.279 --> 00:12:03.279
<v Speaker 2>Open Ai has you know, raised capital from Massi Yoshi

185
00:12:03.399 --> 00:12:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Son to the tune of about sixty five billion dollars.

186
00:12:07.000 --> 00:12:11.039
<v Speaker 2>His last investment was we work lost about sixteen billion

187
00:12:11.080 --> 00:12:13.679
<v Speaker 2>dollars on that, So I wouldn't say he's a very

188
00:12:13.720 --> 00:12:19.639
<v Speaker 2>good investor himself. And now the hyperscale is a juice

189
00:12:19.639 --> 00:12:23.399
<v Speaker 2>in the high whole cycle. There are plans for huge

190
00:12:23.399 --> 00:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>amounts of data centers all across America, one hundred plus gigawatts.

191
00:12:27.120 --> 00:12:31.799
<v Speaker 2>They've already broken ground on twenty and the kind of

192
00:12:31.799 --> 00:12:34.559
<v Speaker 2>predictions they're making are you know, quite phenomenal.

193
00:12:34.919 --> 00:12:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one hundred and fifty gigawatts and just proposed new

194
00:12:38.600 --> 00:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>data centers across the US. One of the but, you know,

195
00:12:44.639 --> 00:12:48.799
<v Speaker 1>one of the limitations on this is the compute. But

196
00:12:48.919 --> 00:12:51.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the limitations as well is just what is

197
00:12:51.960 --> 00:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the actual limit of an LM as far as intelligence?

198
00:12:55.440 --> 00:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of a lot of what I

199
00:12:57.320 --> 00:13:00.799
<v Speaker 1>discussed when we covered this topic last is the way

200
00:13:00.840 --> 00:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>people misunderstand intelligence, the embodied nature of intelligence, and not

201
00:13:08.279 --> 00:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of accepting that LLM is especiically an advanced predictive

202
00:13:12.120 --> 00:13:15.279
<v Speaker 1>text model that can't jump into what is, you know,

203
00:13:15.440 --> 00:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>genuine learning. I think since then, though, I think there

204
00:13:20.879 --> 00:13:23.759
<v Speaker 1>are people in the field that are kind of putting

205
00:13:23.799 --> 00:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>this out there of you know, the AGI thing has

206
00:13:27.480 --> 00:13:30.399
<v Speaker 1>been very overhyped, and it often comes with you know,

207
00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>this can give us great productivity gains, and it can

208
00:13:34.720 --> 00:13:39.399
<v Speaker 1>be very useful in specific fields like coding directed by humans.

209
00:13:40.120 --> 00:13:42.799
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of this kind of sci fi AGI hype,

210
00:13:43.120 --> 00:13:46.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, where Elon Musay in artificial general intelligence was

211
00:13:46.919 --> 00:13:49.639
<v Speaker 1>just around the corner for years, I think you see

212
00:13:49.679 --> 00:13:53.519
<v Speaker 1>some more mature voices kind of damping that. Jan Lakun,

213
00:13:53.600 --> 00:13:57.039
<v Speaker 1>who's the head of AI development at Facebook, says, look,

214
00:13:57.639 --> 00:14:00.039
<v Speaker 1>llms are not going to develop.

215
00:13:59.679 --> 00:14:01.080
<v Speaker 3>A g I.

216
00:14:01.159 --> 00:14:04.919
<v Speaker 1>They are very useful in a certain way, certain limited way,

217
00:14:05.000 --> 00:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>but we have kind of reached the limits of this paradigm. Like,

218
00:14:09.279 --> 00:14:11.759
<v Speaker 1>if there's going to be another leap in AI, it's

219
00:14:11.799 --> 00:14:13.799
<v Speaker 1>going to be from some kind of model that isn't

220
00:14:13.840 --> 00:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>just an LLM. And I think that's clear. You know,

221
00:14:17.519 --> 00:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>we get we're obviously in this race of new AI

222
00:14:20.399 --> 00:14:22.679
<v Speaker 1>models coming out all the time, and some of the

223
00:14:22.799 --> 00:14:25.519
<v Speaker 1>releases have been pretty impressive, but it is kind of

224
00:14:25.840 --> 00:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a more advanced version of the same thing,

225
00:14:28.519 --> 00:14:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the core problems that were there

226
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:34.399
<v Speaker 1>with lllms are still there. You know, these models still hallucinate.

227
00:14:36.000 --> 00:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, you still can't rely on it on supervised

228
00:14:38.799 --> 00:14:43.879
<v Speaker 1>for serious work. Right, it really is still basically a

229
00:14:43.960 --> 00:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>guide because it does make mistakes. It's still hallucinates. They

230
00:14:46.720 --> 00:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't been able to solve that. There's increasingly a problem

231
00:14:51.000 --> 00:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of AI critting this ecosystem of unsourced or badly sourced

232
00:14:56.720 --> 00:15:00.559
<v Speaker 1>and just fake material. Some people have been doc coumenting this.

233
00:15:00.639 --> 00:15:04.759
<v Speaker 1>You know that a YouTuber uses AI, it throws him

234
00:15:04.759 --> 00:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>out a fake statistic or a fake scientific fact. He

235
00:15:09.159 --> 00:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>puts it in his YouTube video, the YouTube video gets

236
00:15:11.399 --> 00:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a million views. That then becomes a source on this

237
00:15:14.360 --> 00:15:18.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe niche topic that other lllms use people posted on Reddit,

238
00:15:20.039 --> 00:15:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and then it kind of enters into this ecosystem of

239
00:15:22.759 --> 00:15:26.159
<v Speaker 1>knowledge within the AI. Sometimes you have you know, one

240
00:15:26.200 --> 00:15:29.759
<v Speaker 1>AI is sited in Krokipedia. We're not really sure where

241
00:15:29.840 --> 00:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Rokipedia is getting the information from that itself as LLM generated.

242
00:15:35.320 --> 00:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So like you're running into limits with these lms where

243
00:15:37.840 --> 00:15:41.639
<v Speaker 1>they can't really self correct. It's still very much human

244
00:15:41.720 --> 00:15:45.039
<v Speaker 1>guided and there's been all sorts of hype about all

245
00:15:45.159 --> 00:15:47.879
<v Speaker 1>these are learning in new ways that we hadn't expected,

246
00:15:47.919 --> 00:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and that we're moving into this new kind of paradigm

247
00:15:50.240 --> 00:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>where they learn in ways similar to neural networks and

248
00:15:54.240 --> 00:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the standard token prediction. And as far

249
00:15:58.000 --> 00:15:59.399
<v Speaker 1>as I can tell, this is all nonsense. I mean,

250
00:15:59.440 --> 00:16:01.919
<v Speaker 1>antime I've looked into these, it's it's kind of a

251
00:16:01.919 --> 00:16:03.759
<v Speaker 1>slide of hand trick where it's like, you know, one

252
00:16:03.799 --> 00:16:07.159
<v Speaker 1>extra step between the same kind of token prediction that's

253
00:16:07.159 --> 00:16:09.519
<v Speaker 1>always been happening. So it seems like we're kind of

254
00:16:09.559 --> 00:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>trapped in this paradigm where they're going to add more

255
00:16:12.960 --> 00:16:15.559
<v Speaker 1>compute and it may look somewhat more impressive, But as

256
00:16:15.559 --> 00:16:18.639
<v Speaker 1>far as breaking into that next step where it gives

257
00:16:18.679 --> 00:16:21.639
<v Speaker 1>you something like, you know, scientific discoveries, which we still

258
00:16:21.679 --> 00:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>don't get from these lllms, you know, again they're helpful

259
00:16:24.919 --> 00:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>their replace jobs and work when you kind of know

260
00:16:28.759 --> 00:16:31.039
<v Speaker 1>what the parameters are and it can do it using

261
00:16:31.120 --> 00:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>existing material that's out there and put it together. But

262
00:16:33.679 --> 00:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>as far as any kind of intelligence breakthroughs, you know

263
00:16:36.240 --> 00:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be providing incredible medical discoveries or

264
00:16:39.919 --> 00:16:43.639
<v Speaker 1>things that are really just going to you know, advanced capitalism,

265
00:16:43.799 --> 00:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like like Musk says, that make us all post scarcity.

266
00:16:46.039 --> 00:16:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just not there in this LLM paradigm.

267
00:16:49.120 --> 00:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, someone like Jean Lacun acknowledges that, and

268
00:16:52.879 --> 00:16:54.919
<v Speaker 1>he kind of says it with the suggestion that something

269
00:16:54.960 --> 00:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that's going to come after it, that's going to be

270
00:16:56.440 --> 00:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the real deal. But you know, I'm not sure. I'm

271
00:16:59.879 --> 00:17:02.759
<v Speaker 1>not sure that there's just this bridge. Everyone is assuming

272
00:17:02.840 --> 00:17:06.039
<v Speaker 1>that and them gets so complicated and then we get

273
00:17:06.079 --> 00:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this kind of self sufficient component in general intelligence.

274
00:17:10.519 --> 00:17:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, I can't even get my Gemini to make a

275
00:17:13.599 --> 00:17:16.640
<v Speaker 2>basic meme and it hallucinates all the time, So I

276
00:17:16.680 --> 00:17:21.440
<v Speaker 2>have to be quite careful about the sourcing. But let's

277
00:17:21.480 --> 00:17:25.440
<v Speaker 2>talk about another of the big powerbrokers of Ai Demissabis

278
00:17:25.799 --> 00:17:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of Google Deep Mind.

279
00:17:29.759 --> 00:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>He was.

280
00:17:31.839 --> 00:17:34.519
<v Speaker 3>Talking about AGI as.

281
00:17:34.400 --> 00:17:39.119
<v Speaker 2>You know, this brilliant you know, something that's equal to

282
00:17:39.200 --> 00:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>human intelligence. That's now the new definition. The previous cope

283
00:17:43.240 --> 00:17:45.960
<v Speaker 2>was there's going to be recursive learning, it's going to

284
00:17:45.960 --> 00:17:49.440
<v Speaker 2>become super intelligent and be able to solve anything. That's

285
00:17:49.480 --> 00:17:54.279
<v Speaker 2>now been dialed back down to oh AGI means human

286
00:17:54.400 --> 00:17:59.400
<v Speaker 2>level intelligence across a number of domains, you know exactly

287
00:17:59.480 --> 00:18:04.960
<v Speaker 2>as a intelligent person, I might correct you a little

288
00:18:04.960 --> 00:18:08.839
<v Speaker 2>bit there. Demester Sarvice with Google Deep Mind did solve

289
00:18:08.920 --> 00:18:13.039
<v Speaker 2>the protein folding problem and he won the.

290
00:18:12.880 --> 00:18:14.519
<v Speaker 3>Nobel Prize for Chemistry for that.

291
00:18:15.279 --> 00:18:18.559
<v Speaker 2>But the way that works different to an LM is

292
00:18:18.680 --> 00:18:21.599
<v Speaker 2>they use the GPU compute to do what they call

293
00:18:21.680 --> 00:18:26.920
<v Speaker 2>reinforcement learning, where they basically give it like a biological problem,

294
00:18:27.160 --> 00:18:32.519
<v Speaker 2>chemical problem, run like, you know, all these huge amounts

295
00:18:32.559 --> 00:18:36.920
<v Speaker 2>of computations, and then they gradually work out how the

296
00:18:37.599 --> 00:18:41.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, natural biology works and.

297
00:18:41.119 --> 00:18:43.759
<v Speaker 1>They were able to discover right, But that's the point.

298
00:18:43.799 --> 00:18:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Did the did the LLLM intelligently make a scientific discovery

299
00:18:49.680 --> 00:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>intuite and how to you know, synthesize these different fields

300
00:18:53.039 --> 00:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and theories, or did someone that had this proposition using

301
00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>to process a ton of data and then.

302
00:19:01.079 --> 00:19:04.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they knew where there were unknowns that were hard

303
00:19:04.079 --> 00:19:07.039
<v Speaker 2>to record, and then they were able to use the

304
00:19:07.079 --> 00:19:12.400
<v Speaker 2>compute to solve the unknowns which were already known byrilogists.

305
00:19:14.480 --> 00:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>But Hasabis is now talking about the use cases being

306
00:19:19.559 --> 00:19:25.200
<v Speaker 2>things like automated labs and we're going to use AI

307
00:19:25.440 --> 00:19:31.519
<v Speaker 2>to you know, solve scientific problems. So overall, the projections

308
00:19:31.559 --> 00:19:36.759
<v Speaker 2>have been downgraded significantly, and there have been signals among

309
00:19:36.839 --> 00:19:40.039
<v Speaker 2>these people to you know, stop telling the public they're

310
00:19:40.039 --> 00:19:45.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be unemployed and things like this. And you know,

311
00:19:45.279 --> 00:19:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the AI build out doesn't get that much attention in

312
00:19:48.960 --> 00:19:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the mainstream.

313
00:19:49.839 --> 00:19:51.279
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of you.

314
00:19:51.200 --> 00:19:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Know, talked about on finance podcasts and you know, tech

315
00:19:55.720 --> 00:20:01.400
<v Speaker 2>nerd podcasts, but it doesn't receive much attention and you know,

316
00:20:01.799 --> 00:20:09.200
<v Speaker 2>in the news or politically. But yeah, Hasabis is probably

317
00:20:09.240 --> 00:20:10.400
<v Speaker 2>the most trustworthy figure.

318
00:20:10.519 --> 00:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say, Well, it's interesting how there is this

319
00:20:14.000 --> 00:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of leftist, populist sentiment of anti AI prolog erics.

320
00:20:21.359 --> 00:20:24.039
<v Speaker 1>You know, those kinds of people are especially disliked, the

321
00:20:24.640 --> 00:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ailig erics. But also this like anti data center trend,

322
00:20:29.279 --> 00:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of it's kind of cross left and

323
00:20:31.519 --> 00:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>right wing. You know, like you've got this guy James

324
00:20:34.680 --> 00:20:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Fishback who's running in Florida as a Republican and he's

325
00:20:39.680 --> 00:20:42.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of griperus candidate, but but he's he's he's doing

326
00:20:42.880 --> 00:20:48.599
<v Speaker 1>this populous like I'm going to ban data centers in Florida. Yeah,

327
00:20:48.599 --> 00:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of it's kind of like a slopuloust

328
00:20:52.119 --> 00:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>slopulous meme like the it's kind of like the you know,

329
00:20:56.480 --> 00:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the the most populist elements of the left and right

330
00:20:59.200 --> 00:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>are both doing this out a center thing. And sometimes

331
00:21:02.039 --> 00:21:05.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not really clear why the general public poses these

332
00:21:05.839 --> 00:21:07.759
<v Speaker 1>data centers. A lot of times, I mean, I think

333
00:21:07.759 --> 00:21:10.039
<v Speaker 1>they have a sense that makes things more expensive and

334
00:21:10.319 --> 00:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's going to be damaging for the infrastructure around.

335
00:21:13.319 --> 00:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But there hasn't really been a well articulated political case.

336
00:21:17.480 --> 00:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's basically just nimbism, isn't it. Like, let's

337
00:21:20.559 --> 00:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>banner in our state and you know, still have the

338
00:21:24.000 --> 00:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>gains of AI productivity, but is built it somewhere else?

339
00:21:27.359 --> 00:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I think there's the cost concern of increasing electricity prices.

340
00:21:32.079 --> 00:21:35.880
<v Speaker 2>There's the environmental concern, you know, things like you know,

341
00:21:35.920 --> 00:21:41.440
<v Speaker 2>the ugliness of a data center, the water usage, et cetera.

342
00:21:43.799 --> 00:21:44.720
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, there are.

343
00:21:44.799 --> 00:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Thousands of these things planned all across America. There's been

344
00:21:49.279 --> 00:21:52.599
<v Speaker 2>a lot of resistance to it. These tech bros are

345
00:21:52.640 --> 00:21:56.200
<v Speaker 2>even suggesting that the Chinese might be involved in leading

346
00:21:56.240 --> 00:22:00.640
<v Speaker 2>this kind of movement, and Sam Altman has two attempts

347
00:22:00.680 --> 00:22:04.359
<v Speaker 2>on his life this year. You know, a lot of

348
00:22:04.359 --> 00:22:07.559
<v Speaker 2>people are very skeptical about it, and you know, the

349
00:22:07.599 --> 00:22:09.640
<v Speaker 2>tech bros are blaming the likes of Amma Day for,

350
00:22:10.559 --> 00:22:13.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, saying that they're going to be unemployed, and

351
00:22:13.640 --> 00:22:17.640
<v Speaker 2>there is this big question that if the predictions do

352
00:22:17.759 --> 00:22:20.559
<v Speaker 2>come to pass and it really is as intelligent and

353
00:22:20.559 --> 00:22:25.200
<v Speaker 2>disruptive as they are claiming, and as it needs to

354
00:22:25.240 --> 00:22:29.680
<v Speaker 2>be for all the debt that's being accumulated, then yeah,

355
00:22:29.680 --> 00:22:31.960
<v Speaker 2>people will be unemployed and we will be in a

356
00:22:32.039 --> 00:22:37.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, semi communistic economic paradigm.

357
00:22:38.519 --> 00:22:39.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we should, we should talk about it.

358
00:22:39.960 --> 00:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, one question is what's what's funding all this?

359
00:22:42.720 --> 00:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Then you know, you can get into the numbers, but

360
00:22:46.680 --> 00:22:49.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, the essential thing is that the

361
00:22:49.319 --> 00:22:52.799
<v Speaker 1>US economy basically is not growth outside of AI companies,

362
00:22:52.960 --> 00:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Like that's entirely what's driving everything, and even growth in

363
00:22:56.039 --> 00:22:58.759
<v Speaker 1>other areas of the economy of the economy you can

364
00:22:58.799 --> 00:23:04.079
<v Speaker 1>say is very downstream of the growth generated by the

365
00:23:04.119 --> 00:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>promise of AI. But it's basically the entirety of what

366
00:23:07.960 --> 00:23:11.519
<v Speaker 1>the US economy is built on right now in serious trouble.

367
00:23:13.039 --> 00:23:16.799
<v Speaker 1>But there's like certain there's certain signs that investors are

368
00:23:16.880 --> 00:23:19.759
<v Speaker 1>getting a little bit concerned about how deep they are

369
00:23:19.799 --> 00:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in this. And the AI companies have used all sorts

370
00:23:23.680 --> 00:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of interesting account and tricks to kind of hide how

371
00:23:27.440 --> 00:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>deep they're spending is. But I think currently the number

372
00:23:30.799 --> 00:23:34.279
<v Speaker 1>is that they're they're spending one point four trillion this

373
00:23:34.480 --> 00:23:39.079
<v Speaker 1>year and all sorts of expenditure, and the revenue is

374
00:23:39.359 --> 00:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>less than half that. So I guess at this point,

375
00:23:43.559 --> 00:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>if we are looking at a serious correction that is

376
00:23:46.960 --> 00:23:50.839
<v Speaker 1>at some point going to come somehow, who is initially

377
00:23:50.880 --> 00:23:52.599
<v Speaker 1>going to bear the brunt of that? Like, where is

378
00:23:52.599 --> 00:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the majority of this funding coming from?

379
00:23:56.000 --> 00:23:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's different types of funding. So the hyperscale is

380
00:23:59.400 --> 00:24:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the big tech companies. They've basically issued a lot of debt.

381
00:24:05.960 --> 00:24:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Google recently did an equity raise, which implies that they

382
00:24:10.240 --> 00:24:13.839
<v Speaker 2>don't think their stock is particularly good value. They raised

383
00:24:13.839 --> 00:24:19.240
<v Speaker 2>eighty five billion dollars with that, So yeah, they've created

384
00:24:19.279 --> 00:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>all these bonds equity raises. Other people talking about equity raises.

385
00:24:23.960 --> 00:24:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Open Ai got funding from Massiyoshi Son Andthropic got funding

386
00:24:30.480 --> 00:24:37.680
<v Speaker 2>from Amazon. Microsoft has seed funding in open Ai, and

387
00:24:37.720 --> 00:24:43.440
<v Speaker 2>then Google also has interest in the Frontier Labs. So

388
00:24:44.680 --> 00:24:49.119
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of mostly for purchasing compute. But there are

389
00:24:49.160 --> 00:24:52.640
<v Speaker 2>also these other vehicles which are off balance sheet called

390
00:24:52.920 --> 00:24:57.759
<v Speaker 2>SPV special purpose vehicles, and these are mainly funding the

391
00:24:57.839 --> 00:25:03.400
<v Speaker 2>data center build out, and that usually involves a minority

392
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:08.079
<v Speaker 2>stake by a hyperscaler around twenty percent, but then they

393
00:25:08.160 --> 00:25:14.160
<v Speaker 2>keep the debt obligations off their balance sheet. And it's

394
00:25:14.200 --> 00:25:19.319
<v Speaker 2>basically private credit that is providing all the additional funding

395
00:25:19.759 --> 00:25:26.640
<v Speaker 2>um so basically American boomers. They're also Japanese banks like

396
00:25:28.279 --> 00:25:33.599
<v Speaker 2>Mitsubishi also funding a lot of this. And the scale

397
00:25:33.799 --> 00:25:37.799
<v Speaker 2>of the buildout is remarkable. They're talking about ten trillion

398
00:25:37.839 --> 00:25:42.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars by twenty thirty, and that implies needing to be

399
00:25:43.359 --> 00:25:46.359
<v Speaker 2>taking two trillion dollars revenue or one and a half

400
00:25:46.440 --> 00:25:51.079
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollar dollars revenue by that time. And it's not

401
00:25:51.279 --> 00:25:55.720
<v Speaker 2>clear where the demand is coming from. I mean just

402
00:25:55.799 --> 00:26:01.920
<v Speaker 2>two examples from the current day space. It bought a

403
00:26:01.960 --> 00:26:04.759
<v Speaker 2>load of compute power they don't have a use for

404
00:26:04.799 --> 00:26:07.960
<v Speaker 2>it and sold it to Anthropic Meta. Same thing. They

405
00:26:08.000 --> 00:26:11.960
<v Speaker 2>bought a load of compute sold it to Athropic. So

406
00:26:12.279 --> 00:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>open Ai and Anthropic are the only ones buying the

407
00:26:15.480 --> 00:26:20.640
<v Speaker 2>compute power that's already been built. They're selling their tokens

408
00:26:20.920 --> 00:26:25.119
<v Speaker 2>at a loss. Their revenues aren't particularly impressive. Well, we

409
00:26:25.200 --> 00:26:29.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know exactly how much Anthropic is really making because

410
00:26:29.039 --> 00:26:32.359
<v Speaker 2>again there's clever accounting there and the likes of Amazon,

411
00:26:32.400 --> 00:26:33.119
<v Speaker 2>who are one of them.

412
00:26:33.440 --> 00:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Do we know it seems like it's hard to get

413
00:26:35.759 --> 00:26:38.279
<v Speaker 1>numbers on what I need these companies exactly are making

414
00:26:38.319 --> 00:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and losing on AI because a lot of time, you know,

415
00:26:41.880 --> 00:26:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet and Amazon and so on, it's not like very neatly.

416
00:26:46.519 --> 00:26:51.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not clear for the hyperscalers at all. But okay,

417
00:26:51.799 --> 00:26:56.559
<v Speaker 2>let's take open AI. Thirteen billion revenue last year, predicted

418
00:26:57.359 --> 00:27:01.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty five billion this year. They lost twenty two billion

419
00:27:02.240 --> 00:27:06.359
<v Speaker 2>last year, and five billion of that was marketing like

420
00:27:06.559 --> 00:27:10.079
<v Speaker 2>TV adverts, trying to get people to pay for chat GBT.

421
00:27:11.119 --> 00:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I believe I've seen a projection that

422
00:27:14.240 --> 00:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they need to have one hundred billion in revenue by

423
00:27:17.799 --> 00:27:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the end of this decade.

424
00:27:18.880 --> 00:27:22.559
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I would have thought more, because we discussed before

425
00:27:22.640 --> 00:27:25.759
<v Speaker 2>that Ortman's predicting a break even in twenty thirty and

426
00:27:25.799 --> 00:27:29.079
<v Speaker 2>they're talking about spending like seventy eight billion in twenty

427
00:27:29.160 --> 00:27:30.640
<v Speaker 2>nine or thirty.

428
00:27:30.960 --> 00:27:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, these numbers.

429
00:27:32.480 --> 00:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>One hundred billion was the number I saw, And then

430
00:27:34.279 --> 00:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>there are projections that they won't be doing ten percent

431
00:27:37.000 --> 00:27:37.279
<v Speaker 1>of that.

432
00:27:37.799 --> 00:27:40.079
<v Speaker 2>And we don't know how much of this revenue is

433
00:27:40.119 --> 00:27:44.759
<v Speaker 2>real because the hyperscalers that have equity in them are

434
00:27:44.839 --> 00:27:48.680
<v Speaker 2>reducing the numbers. Amazon burnt through a huge amount of

435
00:27:48.680 --> 00:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>tokens because they're a stakeholder in anthropic, so it makes

436
00:27:53.039 --> 00:27:58.839
<v Speaker 2>sense to duce evaluation. Same thing with holders in U

437
00:27:58.960 --> 00:28:04.559
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX a Google being one of them. I believe, you know,

438
00:28:04.640 --> 00:28:10.240
<v Speaker 2>they want people to believe in the fantasy so that

439
00:28:10.319 --> 00:28:13.599
<v Speaker 2>their own you know, equity is they can dump it

440
00:28:13.640 --> 00:28:15.720
<v Speaker 2>on the market, you know, in a years time when

441
00:28:15.720 --> 00:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>those shares are locked.

442
00:28:17.000 --> 00:28:18.519
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's talk about SpaceX.

443
00:28:19.680 --> 00:28:23.759
<v Speaker 2>Five percent of the float was iPod two trillion dollar

444
00:28:23.880 --> 00:28:28.480
<v Speaker 2>valuation got squeezed up mainly mainly options buyers up to

445
00:28:28.480 --> 00:28:29.440
<v Speaker 2>three trillion dollars.

446
00:28:29.720 --> 00:28:31.680
<v Speaker 3>This company lost six billion.

447
00:28:31.440 --> 00:28:35.079
<v Speaker 2>Dollars last year and it's been valued at the same

448
00:28:35.119 --> 00:28:39.440
<v Speaker 2>price as you know, a legacy company like Amazon, which

449
00:28:39.759 --> 00:28:44.200
<v Speaker 2>you know controls logistics all over the Western world, is

450
00:28:44.240 --> 00:28:49.119
<v Speaker 2>involved in you know, web services, and it has all

451
00:28:49.160 --> 00:28:55.559
<v Speaker 2>this infrastructure, and you know SpaceX. These satellites fall out

452
00:28:55.559 --> 00:28:57.519
<v Speaker 2>of the sky after five years because they're in such

453
00:28:57.559 --> 00:29:04.640
<v Speaker 2>low orbit. The the starlink business is only going to

454
00:29:04.640 --> 00:29:07.839
<v Speaker 2>make sense if starship works and they can take tons

455
00:29:07.839 --> 00:29:11.279
<v Speaker 2>of these satellites up at the same time, so there

456
00:29:11.359 --> 00:29:14.720
<v Speaker 2>are so many doubts over whether the numbers are going

457
00:29:14.759 --> 00:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>to add up. It's all the can being kicked down

458
00:29:18.240 --> 00:29:20.279
<v Speaker 2>the road and a lot of.

459
00:29:20.880 --> 00:29:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I found a deal on I mean, his ability

460
00:29:22.839 --> 00:29:25.799
<v Speaker 1>to spin an arrative about a company and get people

461
00:29:25.799 --> 00:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>behind it is you know, like when you compare the

462
00:29:29.079 --> 00:29:31.559
<v Speaker 1>valuation to the revenue there, it's just insane.

463
00:29:32.119 --> 00:29:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, think about the clout he built by purchase

464
00:29:36.519 --> 00:29:39.160
<v Speaker 2>an X you know, that would cost him fifty billion.

465
00:29:39.480 --> 00:29:43.240
<v Speaker 2>But the equity he's been able to create since out

466
00:29:43.240 --> 00:29:46.839
<v Speaker 2>of being able to influence elections, being able to co

467
00:29:46.880 --> 00:29:52.279
<v Speaker 2>opt the right wing populist movement, get people buying his

468
00:29:52.400 --> 00:29:58.680
<v Speaker 2>companies is remarkable. And you know, society is just so

469
00:29:59.079 --> 00:30:03.960
<v Speaker 2>involved in the these hype trends. Same thing with The Odyssey.

470
00:30:04.000 --> 00:30:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Everyone thinks this is a great film. It's just crowd

471
00:30:07.079 --> 00:30:10.480
<v Speaker 2>following madness. No one really knows what's going on.

472
00:30:10.759 --> 00:30:14.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that's one thing that's different about this bubble actually.

473
00:30:14.839 --> 00:30:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you look at something like, you know,

474
00:30:17.200 --> 00:30:21.559
<v Speaker 1>the classic example is of a bubble, right, an investor

475
00:30:21.599 --> 00:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>bubble is chulip Mania, right, Or you could look at

476
00:30:25.440 --> 00:30:28.079
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble where you suddenly had a huge

477
00:30:28.440 --> 00:30:33.319
<v Speaker 1>uptick in ordinary retail investors that own stocks, like the

478
00:30:33.359 --> 00:30:36.839
<v Speaker 1>amount of US households that own stock went up by

479
00:30:36.880 --> 00:30:38.839
<v Speaker 1>like eight ten percent in a few years in the

480
00:30:38.960 --> 00:30:43.319
<v Speaker 1>late nineties every two thousands. And then the housing crisis

481
00:30:43.359 --> 00:30:47.599
<v Speaker 1>as well, ordinary people getting involved in this on the

482
00:30:47.640 --> 00:30:51.119
<v Speaker 1>belief that housing prices just go up. Housing is an

483
00:30:51.160 --> 00:30:53.599
<v Speaker 1>appreciate and assen and everyone was kind of in on it.

484
00:30:55.480 --> 00:31:00.559
<v Speaker 1>So those were you know, retail lead or heavily retail

485
00:31:00.599 --> 00:31:03.839
<v Speaker 1>involved booms with with ordinary people trying their money in,

486
00:31:03.880 --> 00:31:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and that was kind of a sign that something was wrong.

487
00:31:05.839 --> 00:31:11.079
<v Speaker 1>But the AI bubble is is something different. You know,

488
00:31:11.200 --> 00:31:17.599
<v Speaker 1>you're you're the the you know, uneducated boomer in the

489
00:31:17.680 --> 00:31:20.359
<v Speaker 1>US is not throwing a lot of money at AI

490
00:31:20.519 --> 00:31:24.319
<v Speaker 1>stock like people were with pets dot com or business

491
00:31:24.359 --> 00:31:26.839
<v Speaker 1>dot com during the dot com bubble, right, Like you

492
00:31:26.960 --> 00:31:29.079
<v Speaker 1>discuss some of it there, But this is very much

493
00:31:30.039 --> 00:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>institutional lead and money between these AI AI companies and

494
00:31:34.759 --> 00:31:38.759
<v Speaker 1>huge investors. So what does that mean for you know

495
00:31:38.839 --> 00:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the nature of it as a as a bubble, Like

496
00:31:40.920 --> 00:31:44.079
<v Speaker 1>have we seen a bubble like that before? Because there

497
00:31:44.119 --> 00:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't even really an entry point for a lot of

498
00:31:45.920 --> 00:31:47.559
<v Speaker 1>people that wanted to invest in this. Like if you

499
00:31:47.599 --> 00:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>were super bullish and AI, I mean you can't really

500
00:31:51.000 --> 00:31:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you can't invest publicly in open AI or on tropics.

501
00:31:54.839 --> 00:31:56.799
<v Speaker 1>What would you be doing ob secondary things like you'd

502
00:31:56.799 --> 00:32:00.359
<v Speaker 1>be buying Microsoft stock because they use up in the

503
00:32:00.640 --> 00:32:03.319
<v Speaker 1>heavily and you know, I guess Amazon, Stark and so on.

504
00:32:03.480 --> 00:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>But Tesla, which you can't really directly buy your short

505
00:32:08.039 --> 00:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>day itself read.

506
00:32:09.759 --> 00:32:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, that that that's the thing. It's you know,

507
00:32:13.599 --> 00:32:16.880
<v Speaker 2>it's had these seed rounds. Early investors have you know,

508
00:32:17.319 --> 00:32:23.279
<v Speaker 2>bought the equity. But now Anthropic Open Ai lining up,

509
00:32:23.400 --> 00:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I pos so Anthropic are expected to float later this

510
00:32:27.119 --> 00:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>year over a trillion dollars. Open Ai pushback to next

511
00:32:30.480 --> 00:32:36.720
<v Speaker 2>year also over a trillion dollars. And I think normal investors,

512
00:32:36.960 --> 00:32:39.359
<v Speaker 2>boomers with assets are going to get left hold in

513
00:32:39.400 --> 00:32:42.839
<v Speaker 2>the bag. All these billionaires are going to cash out.

514
00:32:44.240 --> 00:32:48.319
<v Speaker 2>And if you are invested in a tracker like NASDAK,

515
00:32:48.599 --> 00:32:50.960
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be owning SpaceX and you're gonna be

516
00:32:51.000 --> 00:32:57.160
<v Speaker 2>owing all the hyperscalers at rich valuations. And even worse,

517
00:32:57.279 --> 00:33:00.519
<v Speaker 2>if the demand isn't there and you put a load

518
00:33:00.519 --> 00:33:05.160
<v Speaker 2>of your family wealth into these special purpose vehicles. You

519
00:33:05.240 --> 00:33:08.240
<v Speaker 2>were the creditor for the data center build out. Again,

520
00:33:09.200 --> 00:33:13.400
<v Speaker 2>you're going to lose all your money. And this has

521
00:33:13.480 --> 00:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>been built up so big and the projections are so large,

522
00:33:19.240 --> 00:33:22.000
<v Speaker 2>it really has to work in a phenomenal way to

523
00:33:22.160 --> 00:33:25.839
<v Speaker 2>even get a return on capital. And that's probably a

524
00:33:25.839 --> 00:33:29.359
<v Speaker 2>good place to bring China in because China has a

525
00:33:29.440 --> 00:33:34.440
<v Speaker 2>very different model. It's not rent seeking. They are engineering

526
00:33:34.640 --> 00:33:39.000
<v Speaker 2>with much less compute available and they're producing models that

527
00:33:39.160 --> 00:33:42.880
<v Speaker 2>are ninety five percents good for a tenth or less

528
00:33:42.880 --> 00:33:43.359
<v Speaker 2>of the price.

529
00:33:43.799 --> 00:33:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, you know, talking about what, how are these

530
00:33:46.640 --> 00:33:49.359
<v Speaker 1>companies actually going to make money? I mean we I

531
00:33:49.400 --> 00:33:51.759
<v Speaker 1>think discussed us in the previous show. We did, but

532
00:33:52.039 --> 00:33:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Sam Altman taller investors or people that were interested in

533
00:33:56.240 --> 00:33:59.799
<v Speaker 1>opening that the plan was to build super intelligence and

534
00:34:00.079 --> 00:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>ask it to make money. You know, like that's the

535
00:34:02.000 --> 00:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of promises you're getting. But I mean, essentially the

536
00:34:05.759 --> 00:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>hope is that they can just make a ton of

537
00:34:07.759 --> 00:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>money on subscriptions. And you know, there has been a

538
00:34:13.960 --> 00:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>there's is a constant increase in people buying subscriptions to

539
00:34:16.760 --> 00:34:19.679
<v Speaker 1>a I But obviously to get to the numbers they're

540
00:34:19.719 --> 00:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about talking into the hundreds of billions just in

541
00:34:22.400 --> 00:34:26.599
<v Speaker 1>subscriptions and do like a multiple x of Netflix subscriptions.

542
00:34:26.679 --> 00:34:31.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is a huge adoption rate. And to

543
00:34:31.159 --> 00:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>do that while there are all these AI models out there,

544
00:34:34.000 --> 00:34:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to have a huge advantage, right, I mean,

545
00:34:35.800 --> 00:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>who's who's gonna what average person is paying X number

546
00:34:40.440 --> 00:34:42.559
<v Speaker 1>of dollars per month for chat GPT if they can

547
00:34:42.559 --> 00:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>get a free model, that's ninety percent of away there.

548
00:34:45.880 --> 00:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the whole thing was contingent on these

549
00:34:49.079 --> 00:34:53.280
<v Speaker 1>handful of USAI companies having this huge kind of frontier

550
00:34:53.320 --> 00:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>advantage over anyone that attempted to open sources or do

551
00:34:57.320 --> 00:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it elsewhere, you know, with the support of the US

552
00:35:00.960 --> 00:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>government and the huge data center build out and the

553
00:35:04.480 --> 00:35:09.679
<v Speaker 1>technological advantage and so on. But yeah, like you said,

554
00:35:09.719 --> 00:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>these companies now are ninety ninety five percent the way

555
00:35:12.840 --> 00:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>there with the recent releases. You know, I've seen they

556
00:35:15.760 --> 00:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>have all sorts of ways of estimating, you know, where

557
00:35:17.960 --> 00:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>these models are in terms of intelligence. But they said,

558
00:35:21.519 --> 00:35:25.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, until these recent releases, the best Chinese eye

559
00:35:25.679 --> 00:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>models were about six months off the top performing US models,

560
00:35:30.239 --> 00:35:33.599
<v Speaker 1>And with the recent releases, they think there's you know,

561
00:35:33.760 --> 00:35:38.039
<v Speaker 1>negligible a few weeks difference. So like looking ahead to

562
00:35:38.079 --> 00:35:41.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty, how are they going to As I talked

563
00:35:41.440 --> 00:35:43.639
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, the llms are kind of at the limit

564
00:35:43.679 --> 00:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of their cycle of what this paradigm can produce, and

565
00:35:46.360 --> 00:35:50.519
<v Speaker 1>now beyond that it's just more compute, more data. How

566
00:35:50.559 --> 00:35:52.800
<v Speaker 1>are they going to make a further leap that would

567
00:35:52.880 --> 00:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>justify creating those huge amounts of subscriptions that they need.

568
00:35:56.480 --> 00:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just don't see it. And even with

569
00:35:58.039 --> 00:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the business adoption, what you're actually seeing again, a lot

570
00:36:02.360 --> 00:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of this was just contingent on There'll be one or

571
00:36:05.039 --> 00:36:08.119
<v Speaker 1>two big companies that have the best model and then

572
00:36:08.159 --> 00:36:10.599
<v Speaker 1>everyone's going to flock to them and paid subscriptions. But

573
00:36:10.639 --> 00:36:12.519
<v Speaker 1>the way it's being rolled out with businesses is a

574
00:36:12.519 --> 00:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>bit different, where they're taking this kind of you know,

575
00:36:15.320 --> 00:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>this kind of like cafeteria approach where they take a

576
00:36:17.719 --> 00:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>bit from every model. Like I saw Pinterests achieved huge

577
00:36:23.039 --> 00:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>advances where it used this kind of hybrid model, or

578
00:36:25.960 --> 00:36:29.639
<v Speaker 1>it used some things like open a eye for certain aspects,

579
00:36:29.960 --> 00:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but then it actually took one of the Chinese open

580
00:36:32.360 --> 00:36:35.320
<v Speaker 1>source models and used that for most of it, tweaked

581
00:36:35.639 --> 00:36:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit for its own company, and so it

582
00:36:37.320 --> 00:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was this kind of hybrid of Chinese open source models

583
00:36:40.880 --> 00:36:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and then some of the private US models. But it

584
00:36:43.880 --> 00:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>seems like that increasingly is the direction things are going.

585
00:36:47.000 --> 00:36:51.079
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at actually startups in the US,

586
00:36:52.519 --> 00:36:55.519
<v Speaker 1>I think many, if not the majority of them now

587
00:36:55.599 --> 00:36:58.360
<v Speaker 1>are actually being run on these Chinese open source models.

588
00:36:58.360 --> 00:37:00.519
<v Speaker 1>So already the adoption is there. You know what, This

589
00:37:00.679 --> 00:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>was maybe more abstract when we talked about this almost

590
00:37:03.920 --> 00:37:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, but now like they're becoming serious players

591
00:37:08.320 --> 00:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in the America, are not just worldwide but actually in

592
00:37:10.760 --> 00:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the US, where you would think and traffic and opening

593
00:37:13.840 --> 00:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I would still have an enormous advantage.

594
00:37:16.119 --> 00:37:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, they were talking about huge adoption of chatbots that

595
00:37:20.800 --> 00:37:22.000
<v Speaker 2>hasn't really come to pass.

596
00:37:22.639 --> 00:37:25.199
<v Speaker 3>Now the new cope is agentic ai.

597
00:37:25.480 --> 00:37:28.360
<v Speaker 2>That you're going to have agents doing all your daily

598
00:37:28.440 --> 00:37:31.199
<v Speaker 2>tasks for you, and everyone's going to pay fifty one

599
00:37:31.239 --> 00:37:33.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars a month and they're going to reduce their

600
00:37:33.880 --> 00:37:37.280
<v Speaker 2>workload and stress and all this stuff. I just don't

601
00:37:37.360 --> 00:37:42.880
<v Speaker 2>think that's reality. You know, they're losing, you know, so

602
00:37:42.960 --> 00:37:46.280
<v Speaker 2>much money on the tokens they're providing at the moment,

603
00:37:47.679 --> 00:37:51.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's just new cope in terms of

604
00:37:51.920 --> 00:37:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Chinese AI. Yes, American companies are adopting it because it's

605
00:37:57.760 --> 00:38:03.719
<v Speaker 2>a lot cheaper and open source. So examples they're Airbnb

606
00:38:04.280 --> 00:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and pinterest company.

607
00:38:06.000 --> 00:38:09.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm invested in them. I think is rather a good investment.

608
00:38:11.480 --> 00:38:14.519
<v Speaker 1>Are you supposed to add some this isign investment advice

609
00:38:14.559 --> 00:38:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that people always do?

610
00:38:15.320 --> 00:38:17.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what. Yeah, no investment advice.

611
00:38:17.199 --> 00:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's I never really understood why that's

612
00:38:20.480 --> 00:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a rule anyway.

613
00:38:21.400 --> 00:38:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I mean, you just can't go and you

614
00:38:23.920 --> 00:38:25.920
<v Speaker 2>don't tell people to buy it because it's going to

615
00:38:25.960 --> 00:38:26.280
<v Speaker 2>go up.

616
00:38:26.320 --> 00:38:27.320
<v Speaker 3>But you can say.

617
00:38:27.800 --> 00:38:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I own this dog because you know so. Yeah. Andrews

618
00:38:32.280 --> 00:38:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and Horowitz. Earlier in the year, they reported the over

619
00:38:34.840 --> 00:38:39.079
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent of AI startups pitching to them were using

620
00:38:39.159 --> 00:38:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Chinese models, again presumably because of cost. And China is

621
00:38:46.400 --> 00:38:50.719
<v Speaker 2>kind of lining itself up to really undermine the American

622
00:38:50.840 --> 00:38:55.400
<v Speaker 2>rent seeking model. They're you know, providing these open weight models.

623
00:38:56.400 --> 00:39:02.519
<v Speaker 2>Three big companies, the Kimmi model, the Quinn model by

624
00:39:02.559 --> 00:39:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Ali Barbar, and Deep Seek, and all of them are

625
00:39:05.800 --> 00:39:10.519
<v Speaker 2>performing really well, you know, companies using them in different ways.

626
00:39:11.039 --> 00:39:14.800
<v Speaker 2>But it's not really a rent seeking model. It's more

627
00:39:14.840 --> 00:39:20.000
<v Speaker 2>of a Chinese state influence model, and they I think

628
00:39:20.320 --> 00:39:24.920
<v Speaker 2>they're aiming for soft power by taking this approach away

629
00:39:25.280 --> 00:39:29.079
<v Speaker 2>because they can't compete on the big compute model rent

630
00:39:29.079 --> 00:39:34.039
<v Speaker 2>seeking model. I mean, they may catch up eventually, you know,

631
00:39:34.079 --> 00:39:36.639
<v Speaker 2>I do believe in Chinese engineering. I think they're very

632
00:39:36.679 --> 00:39:39.760
<v Speaker 2>good at engineering. I think they will be able to

633
00:39:40.000 --> 00:39:43.719
<v Speaker 2>reverse engineer the stuff that they do have, and I

634
00:39:43.760 --> 00:39:46.639
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be surprised if they're on par with the American

635
00:39:46.719 --> 00:39:48.960
<v Speaker 2>chip makers within three years.

636
00:39:49.559 --> 00:39:54.519
<v Speaker 1>But there have been reports recently that the Trump administration

637
00:39:55.000 --> 00:39:59.639
<v Speaker 1>is looking at more serious regulations to try and stop

638
00:40:00.519 --> 00:40:03.599
<v Speaker 1>these Chinese models coming into the market and disrupting the

639
00:40:04.039 --> 00:40:07.280
<v Speaker 1>US system. And I think, based on what we know

640
00:40:07.320 --> 00:40:10.280
<v Speaker 1>about this Trump administration, I mean that would seem likely.

641
00:40:10.360 --> 00:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, the kind of the kind

642
00:40:13.719 --> 00:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of like haphazard kind of economic nationalism Trump has pursued,

643
00:40:18.480 --> 00:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>where you know, he'll just wake up and draw on

644
00:40:20.280 --> 00:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of tariffs or you know, band trade with

645
00:40:22.360 --> 00:40:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a country or something. I mean, it seems very likely

646
00:40:24.960 --> 00:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>with all they have invested in Aii, they're not just

647
00:40:26.960 --> 00:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>going to allow us to continue. So I think they

648
00:40:28.920 --> 00:40:30.679
<v Speaker 1>will try and respond to some way. But then The

649
00:40:30.760 --> 00:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>question is what can they even do Because it's one

650
00:40:33.920 --> 00:40:38.679
<v Speaker 1>thing to say, Okay, TikTok is processing people's data in China,

651
00:40:38.800 --> 00:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Chinese owned, We're going to just take control of

652
00:40:40.880 --> 00:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and give it to Larry Ellison. But this is

653
00:40:43.280 --> 00:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>something different because these are open source models, right. It's

654
00:40:45.800 --> 00:40:49.039
<v Speaker 1>not like, you know, it's not like Pinterest is using

655
00:40:49.079 --> 00:40:52.159
<v Speaker 1>this Chinese company and sending people's data there or whatever.

656
00:40:53.039 --> 00:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, you just take the model. I mean, it's

657
00:40:54.719 --> 00:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>basically just taking an open sourced algorithm on the Internet

658
00:40:58.320 --> 00:41:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and using it yourself. So how do you even regulate that?

659
00:41:01.760 --> 00:41:05.559
<v Speaker 1>That seems like that seems like a nightmare, especially when

660
00:41:05.639 --> 00:41:08.400
<v Speaker 1>when they're already released. And then if you were to say, okay,

661
00:41:08.400 --> 00:41:11.519
<v Speaker 1>well future models, we're not going to let them be

662
00:41:11.559 --> 00:41:13.519
<v Speaker 1>open sourced and enter the US market. I mean, I

663
00:41:13.519 --> 00:41:17.159
<v Speaker 1>don't see how you could possibly enforce that. So it

664
00:41:17.239 --> 00:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>seems like they're they're in a pretty difficult position there.

665
00:41:20.280 --> 00:41:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm not sure if the technicality technicalities, how

666
00:41:24.519 --> 00:41:27.679
<v Speaker 2>difficult it would be to enforce such a ban, but

667
00:41:28.199 --> 00:41:30.239
<v Speaker 2>I do think they will be forced into that position

668
00:41:30.480 --> 00:41:35.760
<v Speaker 2>because if the if the American AI bubble crashes completely

669
00:41:36.920 --> 00:41:41.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's just monumental for the world economy. And

670
00:41:41.559 --> 00:41:45.320
<v Speaker 2>imagine how indebted and how broke America will be if

671
00:41:45.320 --> 00:41:48.800
<v Speaker 2>this build out completely flops and America is just provided

672
00:41:49.119 --> 00:41:52.239
<v Speaker 2>and China is providing, you know, all the technology for

673
00:41:52.280 --> 00:41:54.360
<v Speaker 2>a fraction of the price, and that gets mass adoption.

674
00:41:55.559 --> 00:41:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, so much power has been handed

675
00:41:58.800 --> 00:42:03.599
<v Speaker 2>to the likes of Sam Moltman and Dario Amaday to

676
00:42:03.639 --> 00:42:06.159
<v Speaker 2>call the shots here how big this is going to be.

677
00:42:06.840 --> 00:42:10.599
<v Speaker 2>And you know, there's all this crowd following all these

678
00:42:10.639 --> 00:42:13.960
<v Speaker 2>predictions by the banks that are exaggerated saying how big

679
00:42:14.000 --> 00:42:15.920
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be. I mean, some of some of

680
00:42:15.960 --> 00:42:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the bank's price predictions on SpaceX stock is insane. You know,

681
00:42:20.920 --> 00:42:24.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the banks have ten trillion dollar predictions on

682
00:42:24.559 --> 00:42:27.639
<v Speaker 2>a company again that lost six billion dollars last year.

683
00:42:28.159 --> 00:42:32.320
<v Speaker 2>It's it's just it's just you know, mass delusion.

684
00:42:32.639 --> 00:42:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, I would imagine another way that would maybe hit

685
00:42:34.679 --> 00:42:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese companies is to say that there's huge abuses

686
00:42:37.599 --> 00:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>going on with intellectual property, because I mean, you mentioned earlier,

687
00:42:40.800 --> 00:42:43.599
<v Speaker 1>was it entropic that's just scanning through these books and

688
00:42:43.679 --> 00:42:47.519
<v Speaker 1>destroying them. It's just like a brilliant brilliant example of

689
00:42:47.519 --> 00:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>why people kind of hite these these AI companies. But

690
00:42:50.920 --> 00:42:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I assume we don't know what models like

691
00:42:53.719 --> 00:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Deep Secret being trained on. But I mean I feel

692
00:42:56.239 --> 00:42:59.039
<v Speaker 1>like we could be pretty confident they're not really respecting

693
00:42:59.360 --> 00:43:03.519
<v Speaker 1>Western intellectual property law and they're probably just tearing through

694
00:43:03.559 --> 00:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>everything they can get their hands on. And I'd imagine

695
00:43:05.760 --> 00:43:08.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a case that could be made that you know,

696
00:43:08.239 --> 00:43:14.320
<v Speaker 1>this is very unfairly profit and from intellectual property in

697
00:43:14.360 --> 00:43:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the West, and that that violates all sorts of you know,

698
00:43:17.239 --> 00:43:19.679
<v Speaker 1>World Trade Organization rules and so on that have been

699
00:43:19.760 --> 00:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>used before to to force China to lessen some of

700
00:43:23.400 --> 00:43:26.559
<v Speaker 1>its status and with companies. But again, how do you

701
00:43:26.679 --> 00:43:29.199
<v Speaker 1>enforce that to stop at just being open source center

702
00:43:29.239 --> 00:43:31.159
<v Speaker 1>in the market. I'm not I'm not sure how you

703
00:43:31.159 --> 00:43:34.599
<v Speaker 1>can do that. And obviously, I mean the you know,

704
00:43:34.880 --> 00:43:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to even go that route of challenging foreign AI companies

705
00:43:38.280 --> 00:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on that based on what we know about what the

706
00:43:40.639 --> 00:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>exists in US AI companies are being traded on. I mean,

707
00:43:45.760 --> 00:43:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think that you know, there's no

708
00:43:48.400 --> 00:43:52.239
<v Speaker 1>respect for intellectual property with this stuff. I mean, they've

709
00:43:52.320 --> 00:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>in the past valued at whatever like five I think

710
00:43:55.280 --> 00:43:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a case where they valued it at five

711
00:43:56.840 --> 00:44:00.559
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars per book that they trended on, and they

712
00:44:00.599 --> 00:44:03.039
<v Speaker 1>were taking these kinds of like in the authors and

713
00:44:03.119 --> 00:44:05.880
<v Speaker 1>secondary books and so on. But I think it's it's

714
00:44:05.960 --> 00:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>very clear in the way they process data that they're

715
00:44:08.960 --> 00:44:13.800
<v Speaker 1>eating up huge amounts of intellectual property. And obviously, you know,

716
00:44:13.840 --> 00:44:18.119
<v Speaker 1>there are thousands millions of you know, artists, scientists, everyone

717
00:44:18.119 --> 00:44:22.119
<v Speaker 1>else data that are not being credited and paid for

718
00:44:22.159 --> 00:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the work. And that's you know, that's just too fair

719
00:44:24.840 --> 00:44:26.639
<v Speaker 1>a gun. There's no there's no correct in that.

720
00:44:27.320 --> 00:44:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's basically a steal first, deal with the

721
00:44:29.800 --> 00:44:33.000
<v Speaker 2>consequences later kind of model by a lot of these guys.

722
00:44:35.039 --> 00:44:38.239
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I mean the latest cope is that the

723
00:44:38.320 --> 00:44:42.039
<v Speaker 2>Chinese have been stealing all the weights by setting out

724
00:44:42.079 --> 00:44:46.880
<v Speaker 2>thousands of accounts and working out how the models work,

725
00:44:47.079 --> 00:44:51.960
<v Speaker 2>by you know, culminating all the data and then reverse

726
00:44:52.000 --> 00:44:55.519
<v Speaker 2>engineering it as far as possible to create their own models.

727
00:44:56.599 --> 00:44:58.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it wouldn't be any different from what the

728
00:44:58.239 --> 00:45:00.559
<v Speaker 2>Chinese have been doing for the last decades. So it's

729
00:45:00.639 --> 00:45:04.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, not as if it was unpredictable, and you know,

730
00:45:04.719 --> 00:45:07.639
<v Speaker 2>that's just the world we live in. Now information is

731
00:45:07.760 --> 00:45:13.119
<v Speaker 2>very democratized. I think there's huge decentralization going on in

732
00:45:13.480 --> 00:45:21.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, all different fields, particularly military, particularly you know, intelligence.

733
00:45:22.000 --> 00:45:25.199
<v Speaker 2>You know, any which way you spin this, intelligence will

734
00:45:25.239 --> 00:45:27.559
<v Speaker 2>be decentralized by AI.

735
00:45:27.840 --> 00:45:30.239
<v Speaker 1>But I do think you can make a political case.

736
00:45:30.280 --> 00:45:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is obviously AI is coming to the

737
00:45:32.679 --> 00:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>form of politics now. And you hear people on the

738
00:45:34.960 --> 00:45:37.519
<v Speaker 1>left and the right talking about data centers and talking

739
00:45:37.519 --> 00:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>about Palente or an oracle and these kinds of things,

740
00:45:39.880 --> 00:45:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and everyone knows who's some oltmeners and so on, and

741
00:45:41.920 --> 00:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>people follow this drama. But like I said, it's a

742
00:45:46.000 --> 00:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of a misdirected, vague populism that you know, they're

743
00:45:49.440 --> 00:45:52.760
<v Speaker 1>taking their data and making society worse. But I do think,

744
00:45:52.840 --> 00:45:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I do really think you can make a case on

745
00:45:54.880 --> 00:45:59.559
<v Speaker 1>the basis that basically their business model is them opped

746
00:45:59.639 --> 00:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>up the public commons of knowledge of intelligence, scientific discoveries, Wikipedia,

747
00:46:08.280 --> 00:46:10.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, read out where people were just posting publicly,

748
00:46:10.679 --> 00:46:15.119
<v Speaker 1>just scraping the Internet, taking open source books that were

749
00:46:15.159 --> 00:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>out of copyright and so on. But basically the collective

750
00:46:18.559 --> 00:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>pool of human knowledge over thousands of years, that's what

751
00:46:21.400 --> 00:46:25.360
<v Speaker 1>they used as the substrate for these models. Plus you

752
00:46:25.360 --> 00:46:29.880
<v Speaker 1>can also say, you know, the original science, the original

753
00:46:29.920 --> 00:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>theories behind LLMS that was open source, you know, like

754
00:46:34.280 --> 00:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the most influential work and it

755
00:46:36.400 --> 00:46:39.440
<v Speaker 1>came throughe like Princeton University, and these were scientists doing

756
00:46:39.559 --> 00:46:42.800
<v Speaker 1>open academic work. And then obviously you can look at

757
00:46:42.960 --> 00:46:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just look at the technology and how much

758
00:46:45.679 --> 00:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the US government and DARPA and NIH and so on

759
00:46:48.480 --> 00:46:51.119
<v Speaker 1>were involved in the development of all of the important

760
00:46:51.119 --> 00:46:54.800
<v Speaker 1>hardware for this kind of thing. But you know, I

761
00:46:54.800 --> 00:46:56.320
<v Speaker 1>think on the base of that, you can say, like

762
00:46:56.360 --> 00:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the substrate for this is, yeah, the collective pool of

763
00:46:59.079 --> 00:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>human knowledge and thousands millions of individuals, scientists, authors, philosophers,

764
00:47:07.440 --> 00:47:11.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever that contributed and did it not expecting that this

765
00:47:11.880 --> 00:47:15.840
<v Speaker 1>would be used for private profit and it is, and

766
00:47:15.920 --> 00:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>yes there is you know, there is a kind of

767
00:47:18.280 --> 00:47:21.760
<v Speaker 1>private innovation there in terms of obviously the way they

768
00:47:22.559 --> 00:47:25.840
<v Speaker 1>scrape it and processed and presented for a user. So

769
00:47:26.199 --> 00:47:28.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not like it's something like someone just

770
00:47:30.199 --> 00:47:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, grabs a piece of land full of oil

771
00:47:32.199 --> 00:47:34.559
<v Speaker 1>and takes one hundred percent of profits or something like that.

772
00:47:34.599 --> 00:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Like there is a contribution there that you don't want

773
00:47:36.760 --> 00:47:40.679
<v Speaker 1>to totally disincentivize. But I think you can definitely say

774
00:47:40.719 --> 00:47:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is a unique form of rent extraction if

775
00:47:45.519 --> 00:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>these companies make monopoly profits, and therefore there has to

776
00:47:49.360 --> 00:47:54.079
<v Speaker 1>be a way to somehow decide what chunk of that

777
00:47:54.199 --> 00:47:57.559
<v Speaker 1>properly belongs to the public, as haven't been built on

778
00:47:59.159 --> 00:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this public commons of human knowledge, and so that we're

779
00:48:03.920 --> 00:48:07.639
<v Speaker 1>just taking that back, whether that's somehow tax and windfall profits,

780
00:48:09.199 --> 00:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>some kind of distribution of stock that would go into

781
00:48:12.000 --> 00:48:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a sovereign wealth fund, these kinds of ideas are being

782
00:48:16.360 --> 00:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about. No, obviously, I actually think I mean, I

783
00:48:20.519 --> 00:48:22.360
<v Speaker 1>think if you did that and you say, okay, windfall

784
00:48:22.400 --> 00:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>profits beyond a certain point are going to be heavily

785
00:48:25.800 --> 00:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>taxed in a way other corporations aren't because of this

786
00:48:28.000 --> 00:48:31.320
<v Speaker 1>public element, Well, I mean, I personally think these companies

787
00:48:31.360 --> 00:48:33.679
<v Speaker 1>will actually never reach that. So it's probably not going

788
00:48:33.760 --> 00:48:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a problem anyway, because most likely, Yeah, what's

789
00:48:37.039 --> 00:48:39.719
<v Speaker 1>going to happen is the open source of this stuff

790
00:48:39.760 --> 00:48:42.519
<v Speaker 1>is kind of just going to nuclear profit margins of

791
00:48:42.599 --> 00:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>these companies.

792
00:48:44.079 --> 00:48:46.519
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, open AI were trying to make the US

793
00:48:46.599 --> 00:48:50.800
<v Speaker 2>government responsible for their debt, so they're already the hints

794
00:48:50.840 --> 00:48:51.679
<v Speaker 2>of this kind of thing.

795
00:48:51.760 --> 00:48:52.880
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I agree with you.

796
00:48:52.960 --> 00:48:59.199
<v Speaker 2>It's essentially scraping Western civilization, creating a hive mind out

797
00:48:59.199 --> 00:49:04.440
<v Speaker 2>of Western people and selling it, selling it back, selling

798
00:49:04.519 --> 00:49:07.400
<v Speaker 2>it back to people. Maybe, you know, give a few

799
00:49:07.440 --> 00:49:12.920
<v Speaker 2>scraps of UBI to all the people that became unemployed

800
00:49:13.039 --> 00:49:14.159
<v Speaker 2>if it works out.

801
00:49:15.000 --> 00:49:17.519
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the numbers that they're.

802
00:49:17.360 --> 00:49:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Talking about in terms of disruption unemployment are remarkable. McKinsey

803
00:49:24.039 --> 00:49:28.239
<v Speaker 2>is predicting between four and eight hundred million people unemployed

804
00:49:28.519 --> 00:49:32.079
<v Speaker 2>in the next few years. A more modess essment by

805
00:49:32.280 --> 00:49:36.599
<v Speaker 2>Goldman Sex was three hundred million, and World Economic Forum

806
00:49:36.679 --> 00:49:40.880
<v Speaker 2>has they predict that there will be basically as many

807
00:49:40.960 --> 00:49:42.320
<v Speaker 2>jobs made as created.

808
00:49:42.400 --> 00:49:44.559
<v Speaker 3>So they're sitting around neutral and.

809
00:49:44.679 --> 00:49:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Very skeptical how they calculate any of this.

810
00:49:46.800 --> 00:49:50.400
<v Speaker 2>So I mean McKinsey has really lost its reputation. I

811
00:49:50.400 --> 00:49:53.480
<v Speaker 2>mean a lot of these tech bros openly mock them.

812
00:49:53.519 --> 00:49:54.159
<v Speaker 3>Now, yeah, I.

813
00:49:54.159 --> 00:49:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Mean, well, because these projections are really built on speculative

814
00:49:57.280 --> 00:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like what can super intelligence do? And you know, fifteen

815
00:50:01.000 --> 00:50:02.599
<v Speaker 1>years kind of thing. But I mean if you look

816
00:50:02.639 --> 00:50:06.639
<v Speaker 1>at the actual surveys of existing companies, I mean, I

817
00:50:06.639 --> 00:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>saw when they surveyed six thousand CEOs in Anglosphere countries

818
00:50:11.880 --> 00:50:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like Australia and the UK America, and ninety percent said

819
00:50:15.519 --> 00:50:18.800
<v Speaker 1>AI has had no impact on employment, and eighty nine

820
00:50:18.840 --> 00:50:20.719
<v Speaker 1>percent pretty much the same numbers, so that it's had

821
00:50:20.719 --> 00:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>no impact on productivity. So apparently ten percent of companies

822
00:50:24.719 --> 00:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>are noticing anything at all. You know, I assume it's

823
00:50:28.039 --> 00:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of software developers. Certainly it's been impactful there,

824
00:50:32.559 --> 00:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, as far as it's rolling out to

825
00:50:35.039 --> 00:50:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the general economy, I mean, it seems like it's very speculative,

826
00:50:38.760 --> 00:50:41.199
<v Speaker 1>and any numbers on it, I just wonder where people

827
00:50:41.239 --> 00:50:41.960
<v Speaker 1>are pulling them out of.

828
00:50:42.960 --> 00:50:48.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, I think there was You know, most of

829
00:50:48.119 --> 00:50:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the revenues are created by software developers in these enterprises,

830
00:50:53.960 --> 00:50:56.480
<v Speaker 2>and many of those have found out that it wasn't

831
00:50:56.519 --> 00:50:59.719
<v Speaker 2>actually that productive. It worked out for some companies not others.

832
00:51:01.000 --> 00:51:04.320
<v Speaker 2>There was all this talk of job losses being created

833
00:51:04.360 --> 00:51:07.639
<v Speaker 2>by AI, but there is an incentive for CEOs to

834
00:51:07.880 --> 00:51:11.519
<v Speaker 2>sack staff and make it look as though there's disruption

835
00:51:11.639 --> 00:51:13.719
<v Speaker 2>there and they don't need as many staff to increase

836
00:51:13.760 --> 00:51:18.519
<v Speaker 2>their margin and get their stock compensation. This is what

837
00:51:18.559 --> 00:51:22.639
<v Speaker 2>capitalism does. It creates all these incentives that don't serve

838
00:51:22.679 --> 00:51:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the collective. Whole everyone's out for themselves. Everyone's due in

839
00:51:26.960 --> 00:51:31.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, their own book. And you know, meanwhile, the

840
00:51:31.280 --> 00:51:34.920
<v Speaker 2>same people are buying bunkers in New Zealand and islands

841
00:51:34.960 --> 00:51:37.880
<v Speaker 2>and stuff because you know, they're probably smart enough to

842
00:51:37.880 --> 00:51:39.920
<v Speaker 2>see the doom coming if it doesn't work out.

843
00:51:40.079 --> 00:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So I guess so that you know our message, after all,

844
00:51:42.960 --> 00:51:45.639
<v Speaker 1>this is a smash capitalism, tax the rich.

845
00:51:47.199 --> 00:51:49.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean what we've just said there.

846
00:51:51.800 --> 00:51:56.440
<v Speaker 2>The natural conclusion of this theft that has occurred, the

847
00:51:56.480 --> 00:52:00.320
<v Speaker 2>scraping of Western civilization, is that it shared among the worst.

848
00:52:02.559 --> 00:52:06.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think you know, these people, the likes of Teal,

849
00:52:06.400 --> 00:52:10.559
<v Speaker 2>the likes of carp they know that the people out

850
00:52:10.599 --> 00:52:12.559
<v Speaker 2>there are not having a very good time of things.

851
00:52:12.679 --> 00:52:16.760
<v Speaker 2>They know that they feel they're being completely robbed of.

852
00:52:18.159 --> 00:52:22.039
<v Speaker 2>You know, in many cases they're birthright. They're living, you know,

853
00:52:22.079 --> 00:52:26.280
<v Speaker 2>paycheck to paycheck. I mean, so much of us spending

854
00:52:26.519 --> 00:52:30.239
<v Speaker 2>is just the top ten percent and everyone else is

855
00:52:30.280 --> 00:52:34.559
<v Speaker 2>living paycheck to paycheck. Loads of people don't have medical insurance.

856
00:52:35.280 --> 00:52:38.480
<v Speaker 2>And you know, people like Mam Danny breaking through Green

857
00:52:38.519 --> 00:52:44.519
<v Speaker 2>Party in the UK. There is a very leftist communist

858
00:52:44.599 --> 00:52:48.320
<v Speaker 2>vibe starting to emerge, and these incredibly rich people are

859
00:52:48.320 --> 00:52:51.280
<v Speaker 2>looking at it and saying okay. Sam Altman says, Oh,

860
00:52:51.320 --> 00:52:53.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe we could give five percent equity to the US government.

861
00:52:54.039 --> 00:52:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Amiday says, oh, maybe we'll have an AI tax just

862
00:52:58.400 --> 00:53:00.679
<v Speaker 2>to like, you know, give some of these back to

863
00:53:00.760 --> 00:53:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the people. But it's a question that will have to

864
00:53:04.400 --> 00:53:07.280
<v Speaker 2>be reckoned with if it does work out. If it

865
00:53:07.320 --> 00:53:12.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work out, then boomers and Japanese banks and so

866
00:53:12.119 --> 00:53:15.079
<v Speaker 2>on are going to lose a lot of money. Everyone

867
00:53:15.079 --> 00:53:17.199
<v Speaker 2>that's got an index for the S and P five

868
00:53:17.280 --> 00:53:21.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred or Nasdaq, particularly exposed to you know, going to

869
00:53:21.039 --> 00:53:26.360
<v Speaker 2>get wrecked. I could see fifty percent plus drawdowns in

870
00:53:26.400 --> 00:53:29.320
<v Speaker 2>the next two three years on these indexes because they're

871
00:53:29.320 --> 00:53:30.199
<v Speaker 2>already very.

872
00:53:31.559 --> 00:53:33.719
<v Speaker 3>The earnings ratios aren't particularly good.

873
00:53:35.039 --> 00:53:36.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm not a particular fan of him, but

874
00:53:36.599 --> 00:53:39.039
<v Speaker 2>Warren Buffett is like nearly one hundred percent cash at

875
00:53:39.039 --> 00:53:43.199
<v Speaker 2>the moment. I think he's got like some Google a

876
00:53:43.199 --> 00:53:46.440
<v Speaker 2>few other bits and pieces. But you know, when legendary

877
00:53:46.480 --> 00:53:50.360
<v Speaker 2>investors like that are sitting in cash, you know you

878
00:53:50.400 --> 00:53:51.960
<v Speaker 2>should be thinking about it.

879
00:53:52.119 --> 00:53:54.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I guess we can wrap up there

880
00:53:54.920 --> 00:53:57.360
<v Speaker 1>for second show. And it's so fair. I think the

881
00:53:58.280 --> 00:54:00.760
<v Speaker 1>projection from the original episode was already good as far

882
00:54:00.800 --> 00:54:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as the you know, Chinese eye becoming the other big

883
00:54:03.880 --> 00:54:06.679
<v Speaker 1>character in this. Maybe the next one we do on

884
00:54:06.760 --> 00:54:09.719
<v Speaker 1>this will be after the bubble pops and we can

885
00:54:10.519 --> 00:54:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we can look back in these predictions. There'll be a

886
00:54:12.320 --> 00:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>lot to discust.

887
00:54:13.039 --> 00:54:13.199
<v Speaker 3>Then.

888
00:54:13.840 --> 00:54:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it could be apocalyptic and we'll be streaming from

889
00:54:17.519 --> 00:54:19.239
<v Speaker 2>the bunker somewhere.

890
00:54:18.760 --> 00:54:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Streaming too analog radio or something.

891
00:54:20.960 --> 00:54:22.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

892
00:54:21.280 --> 00:54:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, that's it from now. Everyone take care,
