WEBVTT

1
00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to mid Rats with sal from Commander Salamander, an

2
00:00:33.000 --> 00:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Eagle one from Eagle Speak at Seer Shore your home

3
00:00:36.320 --> 00:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for a discussion of national security issues and all things maritime.

4
00:00:40.079 --> 00:00:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Good day, everybody. Glad to have you on board and

5
00:00:43.320 --> 00:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for another edition of mid Rats. And if you are

6
00:00:45.280 --> 00:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>with us live, I would like to extend the invitation

7
00:00:48.079 --> 00:00:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to you. You should be able to find the chat

8
00:00:50.439 --> 00:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>room over there on riverside. We'll be monitoring that during

9
00:00:53.600 --> 00:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the course of the show and if there are some

10
00:00:56.000 --> 00:00:58.799
<v Speaker 1>comments you would like to make, or maybe some questions

11
00:00:58.840 --> 00:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you would like for us to direct to our guests

12
00:01:01.039 --> 00:01:03.399
<v Speaker 1>during the course of the next hour, that is the

13
00:01:03.600 --> 00:01:06.799
<v Speaker 1>perfect place to do it. And for the next hour,

14
00:01:06.840 --> 00:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to look at a challenge that people who

15
00:01:09.040 --> 00:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to naval matters are aware of and may

16
00:01:12.799 --> 00:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>not fully get a lot of the details that we

17
00:01:15.359 --> 00:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure and talk about today. And that's

18
00:01:17.519 --> 00:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>not just here in the US, but across the anglosphere.

19
00:01:20.599 --> 00:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>There seems to be a systemic problem that is taking

20
00:01:25.879 --> 00:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>naval requirements and producing something that displaces holes and displaces

21
00:01:31.040 --> 00:01:34.359
<v Speaker 1>water and put holes next to the pier. And on

22
00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the western side of the Atlantic, one failure LCS was

23
00:01:37.799 --> 00:01:41.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be corrected with a short cycled production of

24
00:01:41.480 --> 00:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>an already existing frigate design and what is now known

25
00:01:44.879 --> 00:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>as the Constellation Class FFG. And we have found since

26
00:01:48.879 --> 00:01:52.079
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen that the dream and the promise is not

27
00:01:52.239 --> 00:01:55.359
<v Speaker 1>quite working out how we wanted it to be, but

28
00:01:55.359 --> 00:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not alone as part of a larger systemic problem.

29
00:01:58.760 --> 00:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And coming back to mid Rats today to talk about

30
00:02:01.159 --> 00:02:04.799
<v Speaker 1>this and other related issues is doctor M. Salisbury, the

31
00:02:04.920 --> 00:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Sea Power Research Fellow at the Council on Geostrategy and

32
00:02:09.000 --> 00:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a fellow at the UK Strategic Command Defense Futures. Emma,

33
00:02:13.680 --> 00:02:14.759
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to mid Rats.

34
00:02:16.960 --> 00:02:18.639
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me back, Solids pleasure.

35
00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, we appreciate you taking some time today to chat

36
00:02:22.240 --> 00:02:24.719
<v Speaker 1>with us on the topic. And I guess to kick

37
00:02:24.759 --> 00:02:26.759
<v Speaker 1>things off and we had you on mid Rats to

38
00:02:26.840 --> 00:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about it is. You spent a lot a lot

39
00:02:30.039 --> 00:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of time soaked in US military industrial complex, specifically the

40
00:02:35.039 --> 00:02:38.479
<v Speaker 1>naval side of the house and the Littoral Combat System program,

41
00:02:38.599 --> 00:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and just as you're starting to clear ahead and take

42
00:02:40.919 --> 00:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a deep breath and look at the beautiful world around you,

43
00:02:44.319 --> 00:02:49.039
<v Speaker 1>somebody delivered the Constellation frigate there on your front doorstep thought,

44
00:02:49.039 --> 00:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I just talk to you a little bit.

45
00:02:50.800 --> 00:02:51.400
<v Speaker 3>How did this.

46
00:02:52.960 --> 00:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Topic of this challenge that we're seeing again in the

47
00:02:55.680 --> 00:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>shipbuilding arena come to you?

48
00:03:02.039 --> 00:03:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's very interesting timing, as you say. I, although

49
00:03:06.840 --> 00:03:10.879
<v Speaker 2>there is no shortage of terrible procurement plans in most

50
00:03:10.960 --> 00:03:14.319
<v Speaker 2>of our militaries, I wasn't expecting another one quite so soon,

51
00:03:14.560 --> 00:03:17.560
<v Speaker 2>especially one that was supposed to learn the lessons of LCS.

52
00:03:17.680 --> 00:03:19.719
<v Speaker 2>It does give me something else to write about, which

53
00:03:19.759 --> 00:03:22.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm very grateful for. And if anyone thinks there's some

54
00:03:22.840 --> 00:03:25.439
<v Speaker 2>kind of conspiracy, then I couldn't possibly comment.

55
00:03:30.039 --> 00:03:32.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's talk a little bit about the article you

56
00:03:32.719 --> 00:03:37.599
<v Speaker 4>put out on a great title, Frankenfrem, how the Constellation

57
00:03:37.719 --> 00:03:40.719
<v Speaker 4>class became a monster, and talk a little bit about

58
00:03:40.759 --> 00:03:45.199
<v Speaker 4>the background of the frigate program and how the US

59
00:03:45.360 --> 00:03:48.840
<v Speaker 4>Navy seems to have got it all screwed.

60
00:03:48.439 --> 00:03:54.759
<v Speaker 2>Up well after the Oliver Hazard Perry class frigates, and

61
00:03:54.800 --> 00:03:58.360
<v Speaker 2>obviously the US Navy needs a new frigate started the

62
00:03:58.439 --> 00:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>ffg X program in twenty seventeen. So what that was

63
00:04:02.039 --> 00:04:06.199
<v Speaker 2>supposed to do is to learn the lessons of the

64
00:04:06.240 --> 00:04:10.599
<v Speaker 2>problems that came from the LCS program by having a

65
00:04:10.680 --> 00:04:15.319
<v Speaker 2>design based on an existing frigate, So what they intended

66
00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:19.399
<v Speaker 2>to do was to take that design make a few tweaks,

67
00:04:19.399 --> 00:04:23.759
<v Speaker 2>because obviously the US Navy has certain things that it

68
00:04:23.839 --> 00:04:26.600
<v Speaker 2>needs that are not present in the frem as is.

69
00:04:27.639 --> 00:04:30.360
<v Speaker 2>But what they were intending to do was to make

70
00:04:30.399 --> 00:04:33.759
<v Speaker 2>the whole process quicker and more streamlined by having that

71
00:04:33.800 --> 00:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>based design, making some tweaks, and then being able to

72
00:04:36.800 --> 00:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>put it into production. And given that the LCS production

73
00:04:41.199 --> 00:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>was truncated because of the problems with it, there was

74
00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:49.160
<v Speaker 2>that need for a small surface warship that Constellation was

75
00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:53.160
<v Speaker 2>supposed to fulfill. But it just turns out that despite

76
00:04:53.160 --> 00:04:57.319
<v Speaker 2>all of these good intentions, the Navy hasn't actually learned

77
00:04:57.360 --> 00:05:02.279
<v Speaker 2>the lessons of the LCS. So instead of taking a

78
00:05:02.360 --> 00:05:05.959
<v Speaker 2>decent frigate, making a few tweaks, and then getting an

79
00:05:05.959 --> 00:05:09.639
<v Speaker 2>into production, they have done exactly what they did with

80
00:05:09.720 --> 00:05:14.279
<v Speaker 2>the LCS, which is just fitzing around with it, adding

81
00:05:14.319 --> 00:05:18.399
<v Speaker 2>things on, not making decisions, taking things off, making it bigger,

82
00:05:18.439 --> 00:05:23.639
<v Speaker 2>making and it's just turned into this lumbering program. That

83
00:05:23.720 --> 00:05:26.720
<v Speaker 2>means that we just don't know when the US Navy

84
00:05:26.839 --> 00:05:29.079
<v Speaker 2>is going to get frigates. And given that the US

85
00:05:29.160 --> 00:05:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Navy doesn't currently have any frigates. This is quite a

86
00:05:31.560 --> 00:05:35.519
<v Speaker 2>large problem.

87
00:05:35.879 --> 00:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's one thing that perplexed me about the whole thing.

88
00:05:40.399 --> 00:05:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Is I think, as I use as a visual on

89
00:05:43.920 --> 00:05:45.519
<v Speaker 1>some of the writing I do on the topic, is

90
00:05:45.519 --> 00:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the classic Lucy holding the football for Charlie Brown is.

91
00:05:49.759 --> 00:05:53.399
<v Speaker 1>We knew why we had to do the Constellation class

92
00:05:53.439 --> 00:05:56.399
<v Speaker 1>frigate program. It was, as you touched on and as

93
00:05:56.480 --> 00:06:00.079
<v Speaker 1>most of our listeners know, is the to use a

94
00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>nice britishism, the complete dog's breakfast that we made of

95
00:06:03.959 --> 00:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the litoral combat system. We still needed a frigate sized

96
00:06:08.959 --> 00:06:12.879
<v Speaker 1>ship to do sized missions, and so we reached out

97
00:06:13.879 --> 00:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe the first it was either the French or

98
00:06:17.040 --> 00:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the Italian's commissioned their first from and twenty thirteen. In

99
00:06:21.959 --> 00:06:24.079
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen we made the decision. So there's a few

100
00:06:24.120 --> 00:06:27.519
<v Speaker 1>years after commissioning we had that, and there was a

101
00:06:27.519 --> 00:06:30.639
<v Speaker 1>few compromises that gave the people who made lcs a

102
00:06:30.720 --> 00:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>chance to repurpose that, but luckily we didn't go in

103
00:06:33.120 --> 00:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>that direction, and so the Navy made a decision. We

104
00:06:37.319 --> 00:06:40.879
<v Speaker 1>had that eighty we sold it as eighty five percent commonalty,

105
00:06:41.639 --> 00:06:46.399
<v Speaker 1>and then, like the plot of some b grade movie.

106
00:06:46.560 --> 00:06:49.959
<v Speaker 1>We handed over the solution to a problem to the

107
00:06:50.040 --> 00:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>same people and processes that created the problem to begin with.

108
00:06:55.839 --> 00:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And it almost seems from the cheap seats that this

109
00:07:00.800 --> 00:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>system is not self aware of And you mentioned earlier

110
00:07:04.040 --> 00:07:08.399
<v Speaker 1>on in your article that markmt reference learning the lessons

111
00:07:08.399 --> 00:07:11.399
<v Speaker 1>of previous failures, as if none of that happened, and

112
00:07:11.480 --> 00:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>they were going to make a point about bringing in

113
00:07:14.079 --> 00:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>an already designed ship. Is is that too cynical of

114
00:07:18.399 --> 00:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a view or was there a lack of appreciation in

115
00:07:22.160 --> 00:07:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the Big Navy arena that in paralleling the old doing

116
00:07:26.800 --> 00:07:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the same thing again and expecting a different result as

117
00:07:29.879 --> 00:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a definition of a sanity that we use the same

118
00:07:33.519 --> 00:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>people in the same processes, in the same procedures that

119
00:07:37.480 --> 00:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>brought us to a hard point again in law and behold,

120
00:07:40.480 --> 00:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>where do we find ourselves in the summer twenty twenty four.

121
00:07:44.959 --> 00:07:47.879
<v Speaker 2>It's really really difficult to know from the outside. So,

122
00:07:48.639 --> 00:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>as you said, they originally planned for the constellation to

123
00:07:52.399 --> 00:07:55.600
<v Speaker 2>have eighty five percent commonality with the FREM. It now

124
00:07:55.680 --> 00:07:59.519
<v Speaker 2>has eighty five percent non commonality with the FREM. So

125
00:08:00.160 --> 00:08:04.199
<v Speaker 2>that shift from eighteen percent to fifteen percent, it's that

126
00:08:05.199 --> 00:08:08.240
<v Speaker 2>shift that we need to think about with what's gone wrong.

127
00:08:08.399 --> 00:08:13.079
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know how many of those changes were necessary,

128
00:08:13.360 --> 00:08:16.319
<v Speaker 2>how many were nice to have, how many were need

129
00:08:16.360 --> 00:08:20.120
<v Speaker 2>to have, But the fact that it went from one

130
00:08:20.160 --> 00:08:23.879
<v Speaker 2>percentage switched around to the other shows that there is

131
00:08:23.920 --> 00:08:27.120
<v Speaker 2>a very serious problem here. And part of me does

132
00:08:27.199 --> 00:08:32.320
<v Speaker 2>wonder whether people will had the good intentions of learning

133
00:08:32.320 --> 00:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the lessons from the LCS. But then you think, oh, well,

134
00:08:35.879 --> 00:08:38.360
<v Speaker 2>if we just add this one tweak, that won't matter,

135
00:08:38.440 --> 00:08:41.200
<v Speaker 2>and we'll just add this on and maybe we'll change

136
00:08:41.960 --> 00:08:43.840
<v Speaker 2>this but over here, and then well, now we need

137
00:08:43.879 --> 00:08:45.720
<v Speaker 2>to make it a bit longer. And it's just all

138
00:08:45.840 --> 00:08:51.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of accreting into this avalanche of changes that ended

139
00:08:51.440 --> 00:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>up with the point where we are today. So it

140
00:08:53.679 --> 00:08:57.440
<v Speaker 2>isn't necessarily done deliberately, But it may just be the

141
00:08:57.480 --> 00:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>accumulation of a small group of people or a large

142
00:09:02.159 --> 00:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>group of people going through and just tweaking tweaking, tweaking

143
00:09:05.639 --> 00:09:09.440
<v Speaker 2>tweaking until it becomes something completely different. But it's very

144
00:09:09.480 --> 00:09:11.480
<v Speaker 2>difficult to know from the outside. I mean, I would

145
00:09:11.519 --> 00:09:15.399
<v Speaker 2>be absolutely fascinated to see some kind of list of

146
00:09:15.440 --> 00:09:18.960
<v Speaker 2>all of these tweaks to see how necessary they are,

147
00:09:19.200 --> 00:09:23.559
<v Speaker 2>if they actually bring any operational value, or if they're

148
00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:28.039
<v Speaker 2>just doing the kind of American disease of wanting things

149
00:09:28.039 --> 00:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>to be exquisite and over produced for what is actually

150
00:09:31.919 --> 00:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>quite a simple task. And frigates are quite a simple thing.

151
00:09:37.639 --> 00:09:41.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's just feels very over designed. And I don't

152
00:09:41.679 --> 00:09:45.840
<v Speaker 2>know where in the process that became a problem, or

153
00:09:45.840 --> 00:09:48.720
<v Speaker 2>if it was just something that was sprinkled all the

154
00:09:48.759 --> 00:09:49.519
<v Speaker 2>way through.

155
00:09:53.279 --> 00:09:53.720
<v Speaker 3>How much.

156
00:09:53.799 --> 00:09:55.879
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's a quote somewhere again, I think it

157
00:09:55.919 --> 00:10:01.399
<v Speaker 4>was from one of the GSA or one of those

158
00:10:01.440 --> 00:10:04.279
<v Speaker 4>reports that part of the problem was that that they

159
00:10:04.320 --> 00:10:06.879
<v Speaker 4>can't the reason for the noodle as is, it's an

160
00:10:06.879 --> 00:10:11.559
<v Speaker 4>incomplete design, and they started building these ships laying the

161
00:10:11.639 --> 00:10:15.879
<v Speaker 4>keels down before they had complete designs. Now that the

162
00:10:15.919 --> 00:10:19.559
<v Speaker 4>frem itself had that was a complete design. But apparently

163
00:10:19.679 --> 00:10:22.080
<v Speaker 4>just all the all the things, as you said, all

164
00:10:22.120 --> 00:10:24.639
<v Speaker 4>the things we've added, have cause some of these issues.

165
00:10:24.720 --> 00:10:26.759
<v Speaker 4>What would it take do you think for the US

166
00:10:26.919 --> 00:10:29.279
<v Speaker 4>Navy and probably the Royal Navy and a bunch of

167
00:10:29.320 --> 00:10:33.440
<v Speaker 4>other navies to sit with the design and build a

168
00:10:33.480 --> 00:10:36.000
<v Speaker 4>few of them and uh and just live with them

169
00:10:36.000 --> 00:10:38.480
<v Speaker 4>for a while. Just is that out of our Is

170
00:10:38.519 --> 00:10:40.559
<v Speaker 4>that out of our I noticed when you talk about

171
00:10:40.559 --> 00:10:43.399
<v Speaker 4>the LCS program. That was part of the issue there too.

172
00:10:43.399 --> 00:10:45.840
<v Speaker 4>They didn't want to build one office and then and

173
00:10:45.919 --> 00:10:49.200
<v Speaker 4>then let the choice be made. It was it was

174
00:10:49.200 --> 00:10:50.399
<v Speaker 4>more complicated now.

175
00:10:51.879 --> 00:10:56.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, so, interestingly, this is how China approaches shipbuilding. So

176
00:10:57.000 --> 00:11:01.799
<v Speaker 2>when China designs and you destroy, for example, it'll build

177
00:11:01.840 --> 00:11:05.279
<v Speaker 2>one test it, iterate it, and then build a second

178
00:11:05.320 --> 00:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>one slightly different, and then when it gets to the

179
00:11:08.039 --> 00:11:11.039
<v Speaker 2>final good design, it will then build. However, many of those,

180
00:11:11.360 --> 00:11:15.960
<v Speaker 2>so China iterates through construction, and that might be an

181
00:11:16.080 --> 00:11:21.399
<v Speaker 2>interesting way to think about it for the Royal Navy

182
00:11:21.399 --> 00:11:25.759
<v Speaker 2>and so on, is to come up with a design,

183
00:11:26.360 --> 00:11:30.799
<v Speaker 2>build it, and then see what needs to be tweaked.

184
00:11:31.360 --> 00:11:33.720
<v Speaker 2>But then again, at that point you may run into

185
00:11:33.759 --> 00:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the problem that the LCS has, which is why we

186
00:11:36.320 --> 00:11:40.759
<v Speaker 2>have two classes of LCS, because they didn't pick a design,

187
00:11:41.559 --> 00:11:43.399
<v Speaker 2>but then both of them turned out to be terrible

188
00:11:43.399 --> 00:11:46.159
<v Speaker 2>in their own special ways. Maybe those could both have

189
00:11:46.240 --> 00:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>been iterated as well. So I think the our navies

190
00:11:54.039 --> 00:11:57.279
<v Speaker 2>don't tend to think about iteration as a good idea

191
00:11:57.399 --> 00:12:02.399
<v Speaker 2>because it just seems messy, I guess. And you think

192
00:12:02.440 --> 00:12:04.440
<v Speaker 2>when you think shit building, you think, right, here's our

193
00:12:04.440 --> 00:12:07.279
<v Speaker 2>design we're going to build ten of them off you go.

194
00:12:07.720 --> 00:12:10.519
<v Speaker 2>But if we cannot do that, then we do need

195
00:12:10.559 --> 00:12:13.039
<v Speaker 2>to think about another way forward, because otherwise we're not

196
00:12:13.039 --> 00:12:14.080
<v Speaker 2>going to have any ships.

197
00:12:15.240 --> 00:12:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I think you hit on a good point here. It's

198
00:12:17.200 --> 00:12:20.159
<v Speaker 1>not well, sure, isn't the lack of money, and there's

199
00:12:20.159 --> 00:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>plenty of that's sloshing around in the building. It's not

200
00:12:22.720 --> 00:12:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the fact that our engineers are less intelligent are bad.

201
00:12:28.519 --> 00:12:32.799
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's almost a mindset issue. Because I have

202
00:12:32.879 --> 00:12:35.159
<v Speaker 1>my own little hobby horses in one of which at

203
00:12:35.279 --> 00:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>least on the American side of the equation. But I

204
00:12:37.639 --> 00:12:40.159
<v Speaker 1>know there's a lot of bleedover for what happens in

205
00:12:40.200 --> 00:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>America to our allies, because y'all send you your best

206
00:12:43.759 --> 00:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>folks here to go to our war colleges and to

207
00:12:45.879 --> 00:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>do tours with us. But it's before and after Goldwater Nichols.

208
00:12:52.120 --> 00:12:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Is that whole Goldwater Nichols joint construct. Goldwater Nichols was

209
00:12:57.399 --> 00:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>put in the law in eighty six. It really didn't

210
00:12:59.720 --> 00:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>start getting its teeth until two palm cycles later about

211
00:13:05.440 --> 00:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety, and then really that whole change in mindset

212
00:13:09.039 --> 00:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>took place because before Goldwater Nichols, the last ship to

213
00:13:13.240 --> 00:13:15.879
<v Speaker 1>really do its initial designs at least was the Arly

214
00:13:15.960 --> 00:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Burke that the US Navy seems to want to build

215
00:13:18.639 --> 00:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to the crack of doom, which is mine. They do

216
00:13:20.440 --> 00:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a good job, But the Arley Burke had a similar

217
00:13:23.200 --> 00:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>characteristics that the Spruance has had, and the Spruance had

218
00:13:26.120 --> 00:13:28.759
<v Speaker 1>a different little aspect I'll bring up in different questions

219
00:13:28.759 --> 00:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>because you brought up in your article that kind of

220
00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>reminded me of it. But the Spruance was whole. One

221
00:13:35.279 --> 00:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>did not hit the water. As this is the ultimate DG.

222
00:13:39.840 --> 00:13:43.519
<v Speaker 1>The Oliver Hazard Perry went through iterative changes. You had

223
00:13:43.559 --> 00:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the short Perris, you had the long Perry's. They had

224
00:13:45.559 --> 00:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of corrections you had to make were already

225
00:13:48.000 --> 00:13:52.159
<v Speaker 1>in flight three of the Arly Burks. There should be

226
00:13:52.200 --> 00:13:56.519
<v Speaker 1>the muscle memory in our systems of the iterative approach

227
00:13:56.639 --> 00:13:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that really has shown a lot of success. But I

228
00:13:59.639 --> 00:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>think you're right. It's this desire to be perfect at

229
00:14:03.919 --> 00:14:06.759
<v Speaker 1>day one. And I don't know if that's so much

230
00:14:06.799 --> 00:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>written into law, or is it because we have accountants

231
00:14:12.279 --> 00:14:16.919
<v Speaker 1>in NBAS vice engineers approaching our shipbuilding program, or have

232
00:14:17.000 --> 00:14:21.559
<v Speaker 1>the politicians a different generation expect too much I'm not

233
00:14:21.639 --> 00:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a believer in single causel there's always multi causs when

234
00:14:25.639 --> 00:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>are in problems. But I think a lot of it

235
00:14:27.519 --> 00:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>has to do with with mindset and not realizing that

236
00:14:31.919 --> 00:14:34.679
<v Speaker 1>both we have done things differently and better in the

237
00:14:34.720 --> 00:14:38.759
<v Speaker 1>recent past in other nations, like you mentioned the People's

238
00:14:38.919 --> 00:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Republic of China their navy, they have a different approach

239
00:14:42.559 --> 00:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that arguably is being very successful. Is that a harder

240
00:14:47.159 --> 00:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>thing to try to approach or fix if you're dealing

241
00:14:49.879 --> 00:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>with a mindset issue.

242
00:14:52.919 --> 00:14:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I sort of wonder whether it's a difficult thing to

243
00:14:56.840 --> 00:15:03.159
<v Speaker 2>sell to Congress, because given that the defense budget and

244
00:15:03.159 --> 00:15:05.519
<v Speaker 2>defense funding has to go through the House and the

245
00:15:05.559 --> 00:15:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Senate every single year, you do have to sell this program,

246
00:15:10.440 --> 00:15:15.200
<v Speaker 2>whichever program is constantly to those lawmakers. And I do

247
00:15:15.320 --> 00:15:20.440
<v Speaker 2>wonder whether it is easier to sell this beautiful design.

248
00:15:20.720 --> 00:15:22.679
<v Speaker 2>We're going to build fifteen of them. It's going to

249
00:15:22.679 --> 00:15:27.200
<v Speaker 2>be great. Give us the money, as opposed to we've

250
00:15:27.240 --> 00:15:29.200
<v Speaker 2>got this design, we think it's pretty good. We're going

251
00:15:29.240 --> 00:15:32.879
<v Speaker 2>to build a couple, might make some tweaks, give us

252
00:15:32.879 --> 00:15:34.679
<v Speaker 2>some money, and then we'll see how it goes. And

253
00:15:34.720 --> 00:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I just I wonder whether there's a mindset in Congress

254
00:15:38.360 --> 00:15:45.840
<v Speaker 2>that has less flexibility for failure essentially, and they want

255
00:15:45.879 --> 00:15:49.080
<v Speaker 2>things to be perfect cookie cutter frigates that will just

256
00:15:49.159 --> 00:15:52.519
<v Speaker 2>be stamped out in the shipyards, bash bash bash, there

257
00:15:52.559 --> 00:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>we go, and they don't have the risk appetite or

258
00:15:56.120 --> 00:15:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the muscle memories you say, of the previous ways in

259
00:15:59.639 --> 00:16:01.639
<v Speaker 2>which is this has been done to be able to

260
00:16:01.720 --> 00:16:07.440
<v Speaker 2>have the ability to allow that kind of iteration in

261
00:16:07.600 --> 00:16:11.840
<v Speaker 2>building ships as opposed to designing them, because designing something

262
00:16:11.840 --> 00:16:16.120
<v Speaker 2>on paper it's not cheap, but maybe it seems cheaper

263
00:16:16.480 --> 00:16:21.360
<v Speaker 2>to those lawmakers than it does to actually weld something together.

264
00:16:22.639 --> 00:16:25.600
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know whether it's a conversation should be

265
00:16:25.600 --> 00:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>being had with and within Congress as to how you

266
00:16:30.960 --> 00:16:34.360
<v Speaker 2>fix those programs going forward, Maybe to allow that wiggle

267
00:16:34.440 --> 00:16:38.480
<v Speaker 2>room of the possibility of failure in a way that

268
00:16:38.559 --> 00:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>allows for iteration rather in a way that sends you

269
00:16:42.279 --> 00:16:45.679
<v Speaker 2>down the LCS route of pumping good money after bad.

270
00:16:46.320 --> 00:16:51.840
<v Speaker 2>There must be a way to rectify that without going

271
00:16:51.879 --> 00:16:54.600
<v Speaker 2>down the same old routes that we've been down before.

272
00:16:56.120 --> 00:17:00.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I know that the obviously US and the and

273
00:17:00.679 --> 00:17:04.839
<v Speaker 4>the Royal Navy developed aircraft carriers, and they they did

274
00:17:04.880 --> 00:17:09.119
<v Speaker 4>not build twelve at once they were iterations, I mean

275
00:17:09.200 --> 00:17:12.759
<v Speaker 4>went from the from the converted coal ship to A

276
00:17:13.920 --> 00:17:17.880
<v Speaker 4>to the all the variations we had during World War Two,

277
00:17:17.920 --> 00:17:21.000
<v Speaker 4>the Essex Class and the Midway, all these other ships

278
00:17:21.200 --> 00:17:24.440
<v Speaker 4>maney of which were still in operation several years later.

279
00:17:24.599 --> 00:17:26.680
<v Speaker 4>That was an interview process. We had the same thing

280
00:17:26.799 --> 00:17:28.559
<v Speaker 4>in between World War One and World War Two with

281
00:17:28.599 --> 00:17:32.559
<v Speaker 4>the cruisers. There was a development of those. It was iteratived.

282
00:17:32.559 --> 00:17:38.160
<v Speaker 4>So and during the war our destroyers were developed on

283
00:17:38.799 --> 00:17:41.559
<v Speaker 4>so you had the Johnson class, which which turns into

284
00:17:41.599 --> 00:17:44.160
<v Speaker 4>another class, which turns eventually into the Gearing Class. No,

285
00:17:44.559 --> 00:17:47.039
<v Speaker 4>we did that before. But I was struck in your

286
00:17:47.039 --> 00:17:49.400
<v Speaker 4>dissertation where you talked about with the lcs. One of

287
00:17:49.400 --> 00:17:53.400
<v Speaker 4>the problems was that the the the industry people were saying,

288
00:17:53.480 --> 00:17:55.680
<v Speaker 4>if you do it the way you're proposing, this is

289
00:17:55.720 --> 00:17:58.000
<v Speaker 4>what I got out of your dissertation, and this part

290
00:17:58.119 --> 00:17:59.759
<v Speaker 4>is if you do what you're doing with the l

291
00:17:59.839 --> 00:18:01.680
<v Speaker 4>C where you're gonna only have a couple, we're gonna

292
00:18:01.680 --> 00:18:03.559
<v Speaker 4>have to We're gonna have to pause our work, we

293
00:18:03.720 --> 00:18:05.599
<v Speaker 4>have to lay off our workers. We really don't want

294
00:18:05.599 --> 00:18:08.640
<v Speaker 4>to do that. That's that's bad. And I'm thinking, well,

295
00:18:08.680 --> 00:18:11.119
<v Speaker 4>that's you know, if I'm a manufacturer, I probably don't

296
00:18:11.119 --> 00:18:13.640
<v Speaker 4>want to do that. The Chinese have the advantage, of course,

297
00:18:13.680 --> 00:18:16.519
<v Speaker 4>that they don't really have that kind of industry where

298
00:18:16.519 --> 00:18:18.839
<v Speaker 4>they have to worry about laying off the workers. So

299
00:18:19.279 --> 00:18:21.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, how much of this is driven by those

300
00:18:22.000 --> 00:18:25.720
<v Speaker 4>those uh what do you call it a malgative or something?

301
00:18:25.720 --> 00:18:27.839
<v Speaker 4>What is the word you're using your dissertation that I

302
00:18:27.880 --> 00:18:30.000
<v Speaker 4>can't remember right off the top of my end. You know,

303
00:18:30.279 --> 00:18:32.599
<v Speaker 4>all these other people have input. It's not just Congress,

304
00:18:32.599 --> 00:18:33.720
<v Speaker 4>and it's not just the Navy.

305
00:18:35.680 --> 00:18:40.960
<v Speaker 2>No, it's definitely true. And I think with Constellation, because

306
00:18:40.960 --> 00:18:46.640
<v Speaker 2>that's being built by Vincantieri Marionette Marine in Wisconsin, it

307
00:18:46.680 --> 00:18:51.640
<v Speaker 2>would have been interesting to see what what Mike Gallagher

308
00:18:51.640 --> 00:18:54.200
<v Speaker 2>would have carried on making of this if you hadn't

309
00:18:55.279 --> 00:18:59.559
<v Speaker 2>retired from the House, and to see it's interesting to

310
00:18:59.599 --> 00:19:04.359
<v Speaker 2>see how those lawmakers whose districts and states are directly

311
00:19:04.400 --> 00:19:11.039
<v Speaker 2>affected by the building of a specific program have their

312
00:19:11.160 --> 00:19:16.440
<v Speaker 2>view shaped as opposed to other lawmakers. And you know,

313
00:19:16.440 --> 00:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>in many ways that is understandable because you know, building

314
00:19:19.799 --> 00:19:23.079
<v Speaker 2>a big program in a yard in your area gives

315
00:19:23.200 --> 00:19:26.880
<v Speaker 2>jobs to your constituents, it gives economic spill over affects

316
00:19:26.920 --> 00:19:31.759
<v Speaker 2>your communities, keeps people in work, so it's very understandable.

317
00:19:31.799 --> 00:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>But then also it can skew how lawmakers look at

318
00:19:36.759 --> 00:19:40.440
<v Speaker 2>whether the programs have merit in and of themselves. So

319
00:19:40.559 --> 00:19:43.759
<v Speaker 2>you can get the effect where a lawmaker will look

320
00:19:43.759 --> 00:19:46.680
<v Speaker 2>at a program and say, I'm not too sure about this,

321
00:19:47.480 --> 00:19:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we need this, or I think it

322
00:19:50.799 --> 00:19:55.039
<v Speaker 2>could be done better. But if I don't vote the

323
00:19:55.079 --> 00:19:58.359
<v Speaker 2>money for this, then forty five thousand of my constituents

324
00:19:58.400 --> 00:20:02.720
<v Speaker 2>will lose their jobs. And that kind of incentive is

325
00:20:02.839 --> 00:20:07.920
<v Speaker 2>very very understandable, but can also skew how lawmakers approach

326
00:20:08.319 --> 00:20:11.279
<v Speaker 2>these kinds of decisions. And if you have the big

327
00:20:11.880 --> 00:20:16.400
<v Speaker 2>prime companies like Raithion, Luckied, Martin and so on, they

328
00:20:16.400 --> 00:20:20.680
<v Speaker 2>deliberately spread the production of their big programs across as

329
00:20:20.680 --> 00:20:24.279
<v Speaker 2>many states as they can in order to say as

330
00:20:24.319 --> 00:20:28.119
<v Speaker 2>many lawmakers as they can, Hey, there's our site in

331
00:20:28.160 --> 00:20:31.799
<v Speaker 2>your district that gives ten thousand jobs. Maybe you want

332
00:20:31.799 --> 00:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>to think about not canceling our product. The thing with

333
00:20:36.519 --> 00:20:41.559
<v Speaker 2>Constellation is, like with shipbuilding, it's much more limited because

334
00:20:41.559 --> 00:20:44.319
<v Speaker 2>obviously there are fewer shipyards because you have to have

335
00:20:44.799 --> 00:20:48.880
<v Speaker 2>some water to build ship. So that does narrow the

336
00:20:49.000 --> 00:20:52.359
<v Speaker 2>number of states and districts that are affected, but those

337
00:20:52.359 --> 00:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>shipyards do become really central economic hubs to those areas

338
00:20:58.160 --> 00:21:00.880
<v Speaker 2>in a way that can often be a lot stronger

339
00:21:00.920 --> 00:21:04.799
<v Speaker 2>than say an aircraft factory or an engine factory or

340
00:21:04.799 --> 00:21:09.519
<v Speaker 2>something like that. The effect is a lot stronger, I

341
00:21:09.559 --> 00:21:14.440
<v Speaker 2>think with shipbuilding, but a lot more focused on certain districts.

342
00:21:15.480 --> 00:21:19.640
<v Speaker 2>So with Constellation, that's going to be very focused on Wisconsin,

343
00:21:20.559 --> 00:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>and given the importance of Wisconsin to the upcoming elections

344
00:21:24.960 --> 00:21:30.880
<v Speaker 2>in November, that might be a consideration. Again very understandable,

345
00:21:31.200 --> 00:21:36.799
<v Speaker 2>but you can argue against that very strongly from a

346
00:21:36.839 --> 00:21:39.519
<v Speaker 2>military operational need standpoint.

347
00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And we see it in the UK, but also in

348
00:21:44.680 --> 00:21:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the US. Is everything you said about the economic impacts

349
00:21:50.880 --> 00:21:53.799
<v Speaker 1>for local Whether you're representative of Congress or a member

350
00:21:53.799 --> 00:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of Parliament, you have those local issues because they can

351
00:21:56.839 --> 00:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>not just be a huge financial and jobs impact on

352
00:22:04.000 --> 00:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a an np are our Comersman district, but also it

353
00:22:08.160 --> 00:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>can be the heart and the culture of a of

354
00:22:10.960 --> 00:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a city and of a people, and when these industries disappear,

355
00:22:14.960 --> 00:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it can change the nature and culture of entire areas.

356
00:22:22.279 --> 00:22:25.759
<v Speaker 1>We've seen in the last few decades that as our

357
00:22:25.839 --> 00:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>ship building capacity has shrunk in the US. Everybody talks

358
00:22:29.720 --> 00:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>about the bracts and the nuxts is we have fewer

359
00:22:33.200 --> 00:22:37.519
<v Speaker 1>and fewer shipyards building fewer, fewer ships, and I think

360
00:22:37.519 --> 00:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>we're past the point. But I think you could argue,

361
00:22:40.519 --> 00:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>at best, we're at the pivot point that a loss

362
00:22:43.920 --> 00:22:46.839
<v Speaker 1>of a yard here, are closing of a yard there,

363
00:22:47.839 --> 00:22:51.759
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in Green Bay or or somewhere between Portsmouth

364
00:22:51.759 --> 00:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and Glasgow, that it's a national issue. Is you cannot

365
00:22:56.359 --> 00:23:00.599
<v Speaker 1>create a shipyard overnight. You cannot create it in a year.

366
00:23:00.960 --> 00:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>You really can't create it in two years or four years,

367
00:23:03.359 --> 00:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>because those shipyards also require machinery, they require infrastructure, They

368
00:23:08.000 --> 00:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>required workers and artisans, especially if you're in the nuclear field.

369
00:23:12.480 --> 00:23:14.279
<v Speaker 1>If you're a welder, you're an artist more than you

370
00:23:14.359 --> 00:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>or anything else there seems to be. And you mentioned

371
00:23:18.240 --> 00:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Gallagher on the US side of the equation. I

372
00:23:20.960 --> 00:23:24.839
<v Speaker 1>think his retirement, combined with on the other side of

373
00:23:24.880 --> 00:23:27.599
<v Speaker 1>the aisle in twenty twenty two, former Representative of the

374
00:23:27.640 --> 00:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Lane Lauria leaving, we lost a lot of not just

375
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>naval knowledge, but the people willing to invest political capital

376
00:23:36.720 --> 00:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>in the topic. But the loss of these capabilities of

377
00:23:40.400 --> 00:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>these yards is in many regards a national issues, a

378
00:23:43.759 --> 00:23:48.079
<v Speaker 1>national security issue. I'm not sure how many warship producing

379
00:23:48.279 --> 00:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>or auxiliary producing yards anyone in the anglosphere can be

380
00:23:53.759 --> 00:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>comfortable in losing in twenty twenty four, because as the

381
00:23:58.000 --> 00:24:01.799
<v Speaker 1>world again gets more challenging ease, there is no surge

382
00:24:01.839 --> 00:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>capacity because our merchant yards that build merchant ships are

383
00:24:07.480 --> 00:24:09.839
<v Speaker 1>almost non existent compared to what they were even within

384
00:24:09.920 --> 00:24:10.559
<v Speaker 1>living memory.

385
00:24:12.279 --> 00:24:17.039
<v Speaker 2>No, you're completely right, and the problems that we're seeing

386
00:24:17.039 --> 00:24:22.319
<v Speaker 2>with shipbuilding at the moment are proof completely that once

387
00:24:22.359 --> 00:24:27.559
<v Speaker 2>you lose that capacity, you cannot get it back. And

388
00:24:27.640 --> 00:24:29.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of the peace dividend after the end

389
00:24:29.920 --> 00:24:34.599
<v Speaker 2>of the Cold War, so much was kind of trimmed

390
00:24:34.799 --> 00:24:39.440
<v Speaker 2>and stripped from the defense industrial base in the UK

391
00:24:39.599 --> 00:24:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and the US, in France and Germany and so on

392
00:24:41.960 --> 00:24:46.480
<v Speaker 2>and so on, and we are now feeling the effects

393
00:24:46.480 --> 00:24:50.559
<v Speaker 2>of that because you can't come in and say, hey,

394
00:24:50.680 --> 00:24:53.720
<v Speaker 2>we need to build ten destroyers. Let's build a shipyard

395
00:24:54.079 --> 00:24:55.960
<v Speaker 2>that'll be done by the end of the year. Then

396
00:24:56.000 --> 00:24:57.839
<v Speaker 2>we can start getting on with the destroyers. Like. It

397
00:24:57.880 --> 00:25:02.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work like that, and it's much easier to keep

398
00:25:02.880 --> 00:25:09.039
<v Speaker 2>facilities running than it is to build them. And if

399
00:25:09.079 --> 00:25:14.799
<v Speaker 2>you'd stop giving orders to shipyards, you lose the facilities,

400
00:25:14.839 --> 00:25:19.279
<v Speaker 2>you lose the talent, you lose the artisans, the designers,

401
00:25:19.319 --> 00:25:23.279
<v Speaker 2>everybody involved in that process. The ones that you have

402
00:25:23.400 --> 00:25:26.319
<v Speaker 2>go off and retire or get other jobs, and nobody

403
00:25:26.400 --> 00:25:29.599
<v Speaker 2>is trained to replace them because there's no need. And

404
00:25:29.640 --> 00:25:33.720
<v Speaker 2>then you get this gap. And then once you get

405
00:25:33.720 --> 00:25:36.839
<v Speaker 2>to the point where you think, oh, we actually need

406
00:25:36.880 --> 00:25:40.119
<v Speaker 2>this capacity, you then have to start winding up your

407
00:25:40.680 --> 00:25:44.559
<v Speaker 2>recruitment and your retention and your education and your facility

408
00:25:44.559 --> 00:25:47.680
<v Speaker 2>building or bringing things out of a moth board state,

409
00:25:47.960 --> 00:25:52.079
<v Speaker 2>or extending a shipyard in one place to have another

410
00:25:52.160 --> 00:25:55.079
<v Speaker 2>dry dock, and all of that. To have to do

411
00:25:55.119 --> 00:25:58.440
<v Speaker 2>all of that at the same time under the pressure

412
00:25:58.640 --> 00:26:03.799
<v Speaker 2>of need is very, very difficult. And I know a

413
00:26:03.839 --> 00:26:08.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of people have criticized the current US administration and

414
00:26:08.480 --> 00:26:14.079
<v Speaker 2>Secretary Del Toro for presiding over not that many ships

415
00:26:14.119 --> 00:26:17.839
<v Speaker 2>being built. But I think that this administration is taking

416
00:26:17.839 --> 00:26:22.400
<v Speaker 2>this seriously in a way that so many previous administrations

417
00:26:22.400 --> 00:26:27.480
<v Speaker 2>have absolutely failed to do of both sides, And I

418
00:26:27.519 --> 00:26:30.720
<v Speaker 2>think del Toro is the first second now that I

419
00:26:30.759 --> 00:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>can remember, who has actually sat down, looked at this

420
00:26:34.319 --> 00:26:38.240
<v Speaker 2>and thought right, Okay, this is a problem. We need

421
00:26:38.240 --> 00:26:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the funding, we need the plans, and he's not going

422
00:26:40.680 --> 00:26:42.920
<v Speaker 2>to get that done in a year, two years, three

423
00:26:43.000 --> 00:26:47.960
<v Speaker 2>years because he hasn't had that. He's not building on

424
00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:50.519
<v Speaker 2>stuff that has been happening in previous administrations. He's having

425
00:26:50.559 --> 00:26:53.400
<v Speaker 2>to do it all himself from whole cloth. And the

426
00:26:53.400 --> 00:26:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration has got this great funding for the submarine industry,

427
00:26:57.440 --> 00:27:00.839
<v Speaker 2>for example, but that would have been me did if

428
00:27:01.200 --> 00:27:05.200
<v Speaker 2>there had been that long term planning from the nineties,

429
00:27:05.240 --> 00:27:09.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty tens, all those previous administrations who just failed

430
00:27:09.200 --> 00:27:13.400
<v Speaker 2>to do that. So I think the current administration and

431
00:27:13.440 --> 00:27:17.640
<v Speaker 2>the next administration will have a very very difficult job

432
00:27:17.799 --> 00:27:21.920
<v Speaker 2>because they are starting from a much lower point than

433
00:27:22.119 --> 00:27:25.720
<v Speaker 2>would have been the case if previous administration had also

434
00:27:25.759 --> 00:27:28.279
<v Speaker 2>taken this seriously. And I think that's a problem that

435
00:27:28.359 --> 00:27:32.640
<v Speaker 2>shared in the UK as well. You know, we have

436
00:27:32.839 --> 00:27:36.440
<v Speaker 2>similar patterns in our industry. From the end of the

437
00:27:36.440 --> 00:27:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Cold War, things dialed down, you don't need to spend

438
00:27:39.400 --> 00:27:42.119
<v Speaker 2>so much on defense, and we have that same kind

439
00:27:42.200 --> 00:27:45.240
<v Speaker 2>of pattern here in the UK. And it's only really

440
00:27:45.519 --> 00:27:51.119
<v Speaker 2>under the Johnson administration that we had a shipbuilding strategy.

441
00:27:51.160 --> 00:27:55.000
<v Speaker 2>We had a shipbuilding office. Things started to come together

442
00:27:55.119 --> 00:27:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and once again that is starting to happen. Things are moving.

443
00:27:59.799 --> 00:28:04.200
<v Speaker 2>But we shouldn't have had to start from scratch in

444
00:28:04.240 --> 00:28:08.119
<v Speaker 2>such a tight time frame because previous people should have

445
00:28:08.160 --> 00:28:09.160
<v Speaker 2>got that ball rolling.

446
00:28:12.480 --> 00:28:16.200
<v Speaker 4>How much do you think of the problems we have,

447
00:28:16.559 --> 00:28:19.480
<v Speaker 4>as you say, gearing up from scratch or related to

448
00:28:19.519 --> 00:28:22.559
<v Speaker 4>the last twenty years where both the UK and the

449
00:28:22.599 --> 00:28:25.839
<v Speaker 4>US have been involved in land wars and the army

450
00:28:26.279 --> 00:28:31.200
<v Speaker 4>seems to be have become i want to say, the

451
00:28:31.240 --> 00:28:35.319
<v Speaker 4>predominant force in both countries, so that the sea blindness

452
00:28:35.319 --> 00:28:39.119
<v Speaker 4>that we always talk about is causing a lot of

453
00:28:39.119 --> 00:28:41.319
<v Speaker 4>issues because the army is army is saying, well, we

454
00:28:41.960 --> 00:28:43.680
<v Speaker 4>really need to prepare for I know in the UK,

455
00:28:43.920 --> 00:28:46.400
<v Speaker 4>prepare for war in Europe, land war in Europe. But

456
00:28:46.920 --> 00:28:49.720
<v Speaker 4>you know how much of that is a forgetfulness of

457
00:28:49.759 --> 00:28:52.319
<v Speaker 4>the fact that you are an island and the US

458
00:28:52.440 --> 00:28:53.720
<v Speaker 4>is essentially an island too.

459
00:28:56.839 --> 00:29:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Well. The problem is that we have also historically underfunded

460
00:29:01.759 --> 00:29:05.359
<v Speaker 2>our army as well as our army is at the

461
00:29:05.400 --> 00:29:09.720
<v Speaker 2>stage where it is not certain that we could actually

462
00:29:09.759 --> 00:29:14.799
<v Speaker 2>field a core in Europe to assist NATO partners. So

463
00:29:14.960 --> 00:29:18.839
<v Speaker 2>the army has a very good argument for more investment,

464
00:29:19.440 --> 00:29:23.440
<v Speaker 2>as does the RAF, as does the Royal Navy. So

465
00:29:23.759 --> 00:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>it's one of those circumstances where our entire armed forces

466
00:29:29.799 --> 00:29:33.079
<v Speaker 2>have been underfunded since the end of the Cold War,

467
00:29:33.200 --> 00:29:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and you can see that in our fighter jets, in

468
00:29:37.599 --> 00:29:43.000
<v Speaker 2>our ships, in our auxiliary fleet, in our infantry, in

469
00:29:43.039 --> 00:29:47.079
<v Speaker 2>our armored vehicles, in our tanks, in everything. And both

470
00:29:47.119 --> 00:29:50.440
<v Speaker 2>the last government and the current one have had to

471
00:29:50.480 --> 00:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>try and struggle with spending our defense budget in a

472
00:29:56.440 --> 00:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>way that manages to fix all of this at the

473
00:30:00.920 --> 00:30:03.640
<v Speaker 2>same time, and that is a very very difficult thing

474
00:30:03.680 --> 00:30:07.359
<v Speaker 2>to do. Obviously, I think that the Royal Navy should

475
00:30:07.359 --> 00:30:13.160
<v Speaker 2>have priority because we are a maritime nation and our

476
00:30:13.240 --> 00:30:15.839
<v Speaker 2>navy is what we do well, and I think the

477
00:30:15.839 --> 00:30:20.359
<v Speaker 2>best support that we can give to later allies and

478
00:30:20.400 --> 00:30:25.359
<v Speaker 2>other allies and partners is naval. But that's an argument

479
00:30:25.480 --> 00:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that is going to be had at much higher levels

480
00:30:28.279 --> 00:30:31.319
<v Speaker 2>than my pay grade. But I would also like to

481
00:30:31.319 --> 00:30:33.839
<v Speaker 2>see to have a decent army and a decent air force.

482
00:30:34.279 --> 00:30:39.200
<v Speaker 2>So it's very very difficult to either the current government

483
00:30:39.359 --> 00:30:42.319
<v Speaker 2>or future governments are going to be able to square

484
00:30:42.359 --> 00:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>this circle because fundamentally it's the same problem that you

485
00:30:46.920 --> 00:30:50.400
<v Speaker 2>are trying to fill holes that have been left for

486
00:30:50.400 --> 00:30:51.400
<v Speaker 2>forty years.

487
00:30:53.720 --> 00:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>In your article on behind the Front, we've been referencing

488
00:30:57.039 --> 00:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>throughout our conversation the Frank and Fram how the constellation

489
00:31:00.079 --> 00:31:02.799
<v Speaker 1>class became a monster. One thing I love about your

490
00:31:02.880 --> 00:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>article I always do this when I read stuff. I

491
00:31:05.880 --> 00:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>was like, hey, are there footnotes and references? And you

492
00:31:08.519 --> 00:31:11.359
<v Speaker 1>have those, which is always great, I think because that

493
00:31:11.440 --> 00:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>gives the reader an opportunity to dive a little deeper.

494
00:31:14.559 --> 00:31:18.119
<v Speaker 1>And one of the references was an article by Tom

495
00:31:18.200 --> 00:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Sharp in June of twenty twenty four. It was titled

496
00:31:21.720 --> 00:31:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the US Navy has fallen victim to the British disease

497
00:31:25.319 --> 00:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for folks on this side of the Atlantic. What is

498
00:31:28.279 --> 00:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the British disease that he was referring to?

499
00:31:32.880 --> 00:31:35.599
<v Speaker 2>Well, when I first read that article, I thought he

500
00:31:35.720 --> 00:31:39.920
<v Speaker 2>meant the Nelson quote, were I to die at this moment,

501
00:31:40.039 --> 00:31:42.160
<v Speaker 2>want to frigate so it would be stamped upon my heart.

502
00:31:42.319 --> 00:31:44.200
<v Speaker 2>But then reading it, I realized that he was actually

503
00:31:44.200 --> 00:31:48.359
<v Speaker 2>talking about something quite a lot deeper, which is Project

504
00:31:48.400 --> 00:31:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Creep and we're very favored that in the UK, and

505
00:31:53.400 --> 00:31:56.319
<v Speaker 2>it's exactly what we're seeing with the constellations that you

506
00:31:57.759 --> 00:32:01.319
<v Speaker 2>designed something, you need to tweak it and add more

507
00:32:01.359 --> 00:32:03.000
<v Speaker 2>bits on it, and then you run out of space,

508
00:32:03.400 --> 00:32:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and then the ship gets bigger and heavier, and you know,

509
00:32:08.000 --> 00:32:11.599
<v Speaker 2>it's the same problem with constellation. And also it's the

510
00:32:11.640 --> 00:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>problem that Tom also references in the article about times

511
00:32:16.039 --> 00:32:21.119
<v Speaker 2>where we've tried to buy a design, a foreign design,

512
00:32:22.079 --> 00:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and then we end up fitzing with it too much

513
00:32:24.400 --> 00:32:26.599
<v Speaker 2>and then it goes wrong. So this happened with the

514
00:32:26.640 --> 00:32:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Apache helicopters, and we should have just bought the American

515
00:32:31.880 --> 00:32:35.359
<v Speaker 2>Apache and made it, but we didn't because we meddled

516
00:32:35.440 --> 00:32:39.000
<v Speaker 2>with it and then it cost far too much, and

517
00:32:39.039 --> 00:32:41.079
<v Speaker 2>then it turned out that we had to have them

518
00:32:41.119 --> 00:32:44.720
<v Speaker 2>rebuilt in America. Anyway, we did it with armored vehicles

519
00:32:44.759 --> 00:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>with Ascord, and we messed that up completely, and then

520
00:32:47.960 --> 00:32:50.680
<v Speaker 2>we tried to build ourselves and now it's Ajax, which

521
00:32:50.839 --> 00:32:54.920
<v Speaker 2>is a complete disaster and makes anyone who rides in

522
00:32:54.960 --> 00:33:00.319
<v Speaker 2>it death, which is not great. So it's this jet

523
00:33:00.519 --> 00:33:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Creek not being able to stop fitzing with things that

524
00:33:05.119 --> 00:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I think is the disease that Tom's referring to you,

525
00:33:07.839 --> 00:33:12.079
<v Speaker 2>and something that I don't know whether we've communicated it

526
00:33:12.119 --> 00:33:15.039
<v Speaker 2>across the Atlantic or if it's come the other way,

527
00:33:15.240 --> 00:33:18.440
<v Speaker 2>or if it's just something that is shared between all

528
00:33:18.480 --> 00:33:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Western armed forces, but it does seem to be something

529
00:33:21.759 --> 00:33:26.240
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing in a lot of places.

530
00:33:27.119 --> 00:33:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I know, I liked in your thesis the way

531
00:33:33.440 --> 00:33:36.599
<v Speaker 4>you tracked through the history of the military industrial complex

532
00:33:37.000 --> 00:33:41.920
<v Speaker 4>and the kind of the vacation that happened after the

533
00:33:41.960 --> 00:33:46.359
<v Speaker 4>after the Cold War ended, and and a lot of that,

534
00:33:47.599 --> 00:33:53.279
<v Speaker 4>the people who were anti military militarism seemed to have

535
00:33:53.440 --> 00:33:55.759
<v Speaker 4>come to the fore, And I maybe how much of

536
00:33:55.799 --> 00:33:58.240
<v Speaker 4>that do you think is responsible for the way we've

537
00:33:58.359 --> 00:34:02.599
<v Speaker 4>approached the kind of the the necessary re arming. You know,

538
00:34:02.720 --> 00:34:05.319
<v Speaker 4>some people, I guess think we still don't need the

539
00:34:05.400 --> 00:34:09.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of assets we have, But is there is that

540
00:34:09.039 --> 00:34:11.119
<v Speaker 4>a big issue you think?

541
00:34:11.679 --> 00:34:18.320
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people pre Russia's invasion if

542
00:34:18.440 --> 00:34:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine definitely had that mindset because the threat we were

543
00:34:23.760 --> 00:34:26.639
<v Speaker 2>fighting at that point was the global War on terror

544
00:34:26.760 --> 00:34:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and counterinsurgency is a very different thing from what we'd

545
00:34:31.840 --> 00:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>done previously, and having a big, exquisite, beautiful armed forces

546
00:34:38.159 --> 00:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>wasn't actually working against insurgents, so it seemed like we

547
00:34:43.000 --> 00:34:50.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't need those capabilities at all. I think after Russia's

548
00:34:50.639 --> 00:34:55.599
<v Speaker 2>second invasion of Ukraine in twenty twenty two, some people

549
00:34:55.679 --> 00:35:01.320
<v Speaker 2>started to see that war in Europe is not a

550
00:35:01.480 --> 00:35:06.119
<v Speaker 2>distant possibility, it is a very near possibility, and that

551
00:35:06.199 --> 00:35:09.199
<v Speaker 2>all of the people who'd been saying this for a

552
00:35:09.239 --> 00:35:15.440
<v Speaker 2>long time before that were not fearmongering and just wanting

553
00:35:15.519 --> 00:35:19.199
<v Speaker 2>more defense money so they could buy stock in Lockheed

554
00:35:19.199 --> 00:35:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Martin or whatever. There was actually a threat, and if

555
00:35:23.039 --> 00:35:27.119
<v Speaker 2>we'd started rearming previously, then we'd be in a much

556
00:35:27.119 --> 00:35:30.280
<v Speaker 2>better position now. But I do still think there are

557
00:35:30.320 --> 00:35:35.400
<v Speaker 2>people who don't think we need to be rearming even now,

558
00:35:35.840 --> 00:35:40.320
<v Speaker 2>and you think that a wider war with Russia is

559
00:35:40.519 --> 00:35:44.320
<v Speaker 2>not going to happen. Who think that, you know, on

560
00:35:44.360 --> 00:35:47.079
<v Speaker 2>the US side, you think that a military confrontation with

561
00:35:47.159 --> 00:35:49.800
<v Speaker 2>China is not going to happen, and that if we

562
00:35:49.880 --> 00:35:54.280
<v Speaker 2>all just sit in our houses with the window shut

563
00:35:54.559 --> 00:35:57.119
<v Speaker 2>and our hands over ears, nobody will come for us

564
00:35:57.719 --> 00:36:00.639
<v Speaker 2>because we're not doing anything and just leave us alone.

565
00:36:01.480 --> 00:36:04.800
<v Speaker 2>And the world does not work like that, especially now,

566
00:36:05.039 --> 00:36:11.039
<v Speaker 2>because everything is interconnected, our economies are interconnected, and our

567
00:36:11.079 --> 00:36:17.679
<v Speaker 2>alliances are important. And I just think that the argument

568
00:36:17.760 --> 00:36:22.840
<v Speaker 2>needs to be made to the public more widely that

569
00:36:22.960 --> 00:36:27.880
<v Speaker 2>defense spending, investment in our armed forces is not only desirable,

570
00:36:27.920 --> 00:36:32.840
<v Speaker 2>but is necessary. And it's necessary now, not when the

571
00:36:32.880 --> 00:36:36.519
<v Speaker 2>threat is immediate. And I think the thing that worries

572
00:36:36.559 --> 00:36:40.400
<v Speaker 2>me is that people won't take that seriously until it's

573
00:36:40.400 --> 00:36:44.800
<v Speaker 2>too late. And you do not want to be in

574
00:36:44.840 --> 00:36:50.119
<v Speaker 2>the position of having troops entering the borders of an

575
00:36:50.159 --> 00:36:52.280
<v Speaker 2>ally and you don't know, you're not ready, and you

576
00:36:52.320 --> 00:36:57.760
<v Speaker 2>don't have the capability, the personnel, the platforms to respond

577
00:36:57.920 --> 00:37:01.599
<v Speaker 2>to protect our ally, whether that Taiwan or Estonia or

578
00:37:01.599 --> 00:37:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Poland or wherever. And the public, a lot of the public,

579
00:37:07.519 --> 00:37:12.639
<v Speaker 2>I think, aren't interested in hearing that argument, which means

580
00:37:12.800 --> 00:37:13.639
<v Speaker 2>to chatter louder.

581
00:37:15.159 --> 00:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with you that the you know, here,

582
00:37:16.840 --> 00:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we are in the third year of the Russia Ukrainian

583
00:37:19.880 --> 00:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>War if you define it as starting from twenty twenty two,

584
00:37:22.400 --> 00:37:25.039
<v Speaker 1>but you're right, it really began back in twenty fourteen.

585
00:37:25.440 --> 00:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>It is an opportunity because it has opened up a

586
00:37:28.000 --> 00:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of eyes on the civilian sector, both usual people

587
00:37:33.000 --> 00:37:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but politicians. I do get a feeling. I believe you

588
00:37:35.800 --> 00:37:41.840
<v Speaker 1>do as well. It's not getting the traction that we

589
00:37:41.920 --> 00:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>would want it to. When that doesn't just mean that

590
00:37:45.480 --> 00:37:48.159
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to seeing one we see three articles of

591
00:37:48.239 --> 00:37:51.320
<v Speaker 1>people asking for larger defense, but we actually see the investment,

592
00:37:52.239 --> 00:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>We see the allocation of resources in the change of mindset.

593
00:37:57.800 --> 00:37:59.760
<v Speaker 1>But when it looked at the problem we have with

594
00:37:59.800 --> 00:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the fleet, you know, there's the old phrase of throwing

595
00:38:02.760 --> 00:38:05.679
<v Speaker 1>good money after bad. Let's put in all of our

596
00:38:05.719 --> 00:38:09.639
<v Speaker 1>own optimism filters, and let's say that we're able to

597
00:38:09.719 --> 00:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>change some mindsets and we have more of the people

598
00:38:12.760 --> 00:38:15.199
<v Speaker 1>that have their hands on the levers of power and

599
00:38:15.239 --> 00:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>budgets on the civilian side of the national security and

600
00:38:17.880 --> 00:38:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the political arena. We've got them on board, we've got

601
00:38:20.440 --> 00:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>them changing. But inside the lifelines of the uniform side

602
00:38:26.480 --> 00:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of the shop, there's more money necessarily going to make

603
00:38:31.840 --> 00:38:35.199
<v Speaker 1>it better. You know, you mentioned the incremental Nitanoid changes.

604
00:38:35.320 --> 00:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what killed over here in the US, the CGX

605
00:38:38.440 --> 00:38:41.320
<v Speaker 1>program that they were going to turn into some Battlestar

606
00:38:41.360 --> 00:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Galactica looking creation that nobody could afford or explain because

607
00:38:45.239 --> 00:38:48.519
<v Speaker 1>there was no program control where somebody said, no, we're

608
00:38:48.519 --> 00:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to do that, We're going to do this instead,

609
00:38:50.960 --> 00:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>and it just grew out of control. And you even

610
00:38:53.320 --> 00:38:56.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that when it comes to the Constellation class that

611
00:38:58.440 --> 00:39:02.559
<v Speaker 1>I'll do a little quote for you this vision when

612
00:39:02.559 --> 00:39:06.639
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about why we are bringing the Constellation on board. However,

613
00:39:07.039 --> 00:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>now has a number of holes below the waterline, all

614
00:39:10.440 --> 00:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>caused by the navy. Unquote, where do you find the

615
00:39:14.880 --> 00:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>holemakers inside the Navy that if you could have your

616
00:39:18.800 --> 00:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>own little group of enforcers go in there and dig

617
00:39:22.039 --> 00:39:26.639
<v Speaker 1>around and name where are some of those entities inside

618
00:39:26.679 --> 00:39:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the navy proper you think that are part of the

619
00:39:30.800 --> 00:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>problem and not part of a future solution that need

620
00:39:33.000 --> 00:39:35.159
<v Speaker 1>to be reformed, replaced or eliminated.

621
00:39:37.000 --> 00:39:38.679
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, that is a big question.

622
00:39:39.679 --> 00:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Make you impress for a day.

623
00:39:43.320 --> 00:39:46.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, America's traditionally loved having a British monarch,

624
00:39:46.440 --> 00:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>so I think this would be fine. I think NAPSI

625
00:39:50.679 --> 00:39:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I'd start naps. But the problem is with this kind

626
00:39:54.960 --> 00:40:00.480
<v Speaker 2>of thing is that ultimately the box stops with theleadership,

627
00:40:00.559 --> 00:40:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and there hasn't been the leadership from the top to

628
00:40:07.519 --> 00:40:11.639
<v Speaker 2>make things happen and to keep an eye on things

629
00:40:12.599 --> 00:40:16.000
<v Speaker 2>and to make sure that projects like this are not

630
00:40:16.440 --> 00:40:20.800
<v Speaker 2>ballooning in the way that the Constellation has. And I

631
00:40:20.920 --> 00:40:26.440
<v Speaker 2>was pleased to see last week that we're now having

632
00:40:27.679 --> 00:40:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a program manager for the Maritime Industrial Base that SECNAV

633
00:40:32.480 --> 00:40:36.559
<v Speaker 2>has hired and this man's entire job is going to

634
00:40:36.599 --> 00:40:42.719
<v Speaker 2>be overseeing investments in the industrial base. And I'm hoping

635
00:40:42.840 --> 00:40:47.559
<v Speaker 2>that will mean that there is accountability in leadership for

636
00:40:48.000 --> 00:40:52.400
<v Speaker 2>this going forward. So I'm hoping that will help. But

637
00:40:52.920 --> 00:40:57.559
<v Speaker 2>the problem is that wherever you go with trying to

638
00:40:57.599 --> 00:41:00.639
<v Speaker 2>place blame, I don't think it's really possible. Well, because

639
00:41:00.719 --> 00:41:05.800
<v Speaker 2>this kind of thing is so systemic, and I think

640
00:41:05.880 --> 00:41:10.840
<v Speaker 2>if I had to fire everybody who had badly contributed

641
00:41:10.960 --> 00:41:14.559
<v Speaker 2>to a naval procurement program in the United States, we

642
00:41:14.599 --> 00:41:15.679
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have anyone left.

643
00:41:18.960 --> 00:41:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Let me let me ask another question that troubles me.

644
00:41:23.079 --> 00:41:28.239
<v Speaker 4>Going forward. We seem to have a magic viewer, that

645
00:41:28.280 --> 00:41:31.119
<v Speaker 4>there's some kind of magic motion pixie dust or something

646
00:41:31.119 --> 00:41:34.599
<v Speaker 4>that's going to solve all our problems and maybe maybe

647
00:41:34.639 --> 00:41:38.679
<v Speaker 4>make large ships totally unnecessary. I mean about AI and

648
00:41:38.920 --> 00:41:42.280
<v Speaker 4>unmanned assets and you know, tech tech tech, we're going

649
00:41:42.320 --> 00:41:46.039
<v Speaker 4>to teck ourselves to death. Uh, how much of that

650
00:41:46.079 --> 00:41:49.440
<v Speaker 4>do you think is wishful thinking? And we we need

651
00:41:50.280 --> 00:41:51.559
<v Speaker 4>if we're going to have a free we need to

652
00:41:51.599 --> 00:41:54.280
<v Speaker 4>a frigate can do a frigate's job. Somebody in the

653
00:41:54.320 --> 00:41:58.599
<v Speaker 4>chat room talks about Uh, the f FG's potentially being

654
00:41:58.639 --> 00:42:01.840
<v Speaker 4>outgunned by Chinese ships. You know. His comment is why

655
00:42:01.840 --> 00:42:02.480
<v Speaker 4>does that matter?

656
00:42:03.000 --> 00:42:03.199
<v Speaker 3>You know?

657
00:42:03.559 --> 00:42:06.199
<v Speaker 4>Is it a matter really keeping an idea in mind

658
00:42:06.239 --> 00:42:08.360
<v Speaker 4>about what this ship is supposed to do or this

659
00:42:09.000 --> 00:42:12.880
<v Speaker 4>asset is supposed to do, and stop trying to make

660
00:42:12.920 --> 00:42:13.840
<v Speaker 4>it into something it's not.

661
00:42:16.000 --> 00:42:17.559
<v Speaker 2>I think that has been a huge part of the

662
00:42:17.559 --> 00:42:22.840
<v Speaker 2>problem with constellation is that frigates themselves have quite a

663
00:42:22.920 --> 00:42:26.199
<v Speaker 2>simple role or set of roles, and you don't need

664
00:42:26.239 --> 00:42:29.719
<v Speaker 2>to make a frigate into a destroyer or into a

665
00:42:29.800 --> 00:42:33.360
<v Speaker 2>cruiser or anything else for it to have significant value

666
00:42:33.360 --> 00:42:36.360
<v Speaker 2>to the fleet. And if you're trying to make a

667
00:42:36.360 --> 00:42:42.559
<v Speaker 2>frigate do everything and be exquisitely armed and be able

668
00:42:42.599 --> 00:42:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to do asw and that is where you get these

669
00:42:47.159 --> 00:42:52.800
<v Speaker 2>monstrosities with every single thing added onto them, and it

670
00:42:52.800 --> 00:42:58.920
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work. I think actually with these ships, sleek, simple

671
00:43:00.039 --> 00:43:05.239
<v Speaker 2>outcomes are better. And this is where the FREM is

672
00:43:05.280 --> 00:43:07.719
<v Speaker 2>a good idea, because that's what the FREM does. It

673
00:43:07.800 --> 00:43:11.800
<v Speaker 2>is a decent frigate. And if you've just taken the frame,

674
00:43:12.440 --> 00:43:15.639
<v Speaker 2>made a couple of weeks and churn them out, you

675
00:43:15.679 --> 00:43:18.920
<v Speaker 2>would have had a fleet of decent frigates. That do

676
00:43:19.039 --> 00:43:22.519
<v Speaker 2>what frigates do. They do not need to do everything else,

677
00:43:23.000 --> 00:43:25.000
<v Speaker 2>they just need to do what a frigate does. And

678
00:43:25.039 --> 00:43:28.760
<v Speaker 2>with technology, I think there's a tendency to think that

679
00:43:28.880 --> 00:43:33.559
<v Speaker 2>if something can be added, it should be added, and

680
00:43:33.599 --> 00:43:37.719
<v Speaker 2>that extends to kind of more modern stuff like AI,

681
00:43:37.800 --> 00:43:41.199
<v Speaker 2>machine learning, all of that kind of thing. If it

682
00:43:41.280 --> 00:43:43.440
<v Speaker 2>can be done, it should be done. And I think

683
00:43:43.519 --> 00:43:48.239
<v Speaker 2>there needs to be much more thought about exactly which

684
00:43:48.360 --> 00:43:53.920
<v Speaker 2>capabilities can be augmented by each of these technologies, should

685
00:43:53.960 --> 00:43:59.119
<v Speaker 2>they be does it actually add value to that capability,

686
00:44:00.480 --> 00:44:05.079
<v Speaker 2>And when it comes to uncrewed technology especially, I think

687
00:44:06.079 --> 00:44:11.159
<v Speaker 2>uncrewed is the future. Having an uncrewed fleet would be spectacular.

688
00:44:11.199 --> 00:44:15.360
<v Speaker 2>It would add mass, it would add ISR capabilities, all

689
00:44:15.360 --> 00:44:17.519
<v Speaker 2>this kind of thing. It would be great. But we

690
00:44:17.559 --> 00:44:21.639
<v Speaker 2>are not there yet with the technology. Having a significant

691
00:44:21.800 --> 00:44:25.039
<v Speaker 2>number of uncrewed vessels is not going to happen in

692
00:44:25.079 --> 00:44:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the next twenty thirty years because that tech is still

693
00:44:28.320 --> 00:44:32.719
<v Speaker 2>being developed and iterated and it needs to be fitted

694
00:44:32.760 --> 00:44:36.559
<v Speaker 2>into the fleet structures. So there is going to be

695
00:44:37.079 --> 00:44:40.719
<v Speaker 2>a next iteration of the fleet that needs to have

696
00:44:40.880 --> 00:44:44.840
<v Speaker 2>crued platforms. So we need to do those properly and

697
00:44:44.920 --> 00:44:48.719
<v Speaker 2>not rely on uncrewed platforms to solve our problems with

698
00:44:48.760 --> 00:44:52.760
<v Speaker 2>personnel because they don't, and to not rely on uncrewed

699
00:44:52.800 --> 00:44:56.800
<v Speaker 2>platforms to solve our problems with overdesigning things because they don't.

700
00:44:57.039 --> 00:45:03.760
<v Speaker 2>And I do worry that people look at modern technology

701
00:45:03.880 --> 00:45:06.719
<v Speaker 2>and think, as you say, it's this magic pixie dust

702
00:45:06.760 --> 00:45:09.079
<v Speaker 2>that's going to fix all of our problems, and I

703
00:45:09.159 --> 00:45:11.360
<v Speaker 2>just don't think that's the case. I think it will

704
00:45:11.400 --> 00:45:14.800
<v Speaker 2>add great value to a future fleet, but we are

705
00:45:14.840 --> 00:45:17.199
<v Speaker 2>not there yet, and we need to think seriously about

706
00:45:17.199 --> 00:45:20.960
<v Speaker 2>traditional crew platforms in the interim, otherwise we're going to

707
00:45:20.960 --> 00:45:21.800
<v Speaker 2>have a massive gap.

708
00:45:23.239 --> 00:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we've already tripped over ourselves a few times with

709
00:45:26.000 --> 00:45:29.519
<v Speaker 1>being a little bit too optimistic about what the future

710
00:45:29.599 --> 00:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to bring and how fast it's going to

711
00:45:31.480 --> 00:45:34.360
<v Speaker 1>bring it. You mentioned something that I think is important

712
00:45:34.400 --> 00:45:37.079
<v Speaker 1>that it's always concerned me. I remember when going back

713
00:45:37.119 --> 00:45:40.199
<v Speaker 1>to the spruance is when the spruances were first brought online,

714
00:45:40.800 --> 00:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a couple of people from the cheap sheets,

715
00:45:44.119 --> 00:45:48.119
<v Speaker 1>cheap seats that would throw bricks at it, saying that

716
00:45:48.239 --> 00:45:50.159
<v Speaker 1>we have all this empty space here. Well, the empty

717
00:45:50.199 --> 00:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>space was designed into the ship at the beginning, going yes,

718
00:45:54.000 --> 00:45:55.760
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to fill it over the course of

719
00:45:55.800 --> 00:45:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the next decade with these different systems that are going

720
00:45:58.800 --> 00:46:00.239
<v Speaker 1>to be coming online. But we're going to get the

721
00:46:00.280 --> 00:46:02.599
<v Speaker 1>ship in the hole in the water. You know, a

722
00:46:03.119 --> 00:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>point eight of a d D is better than a

723
00:46:05.599 --> 00:46:07.639
<v Speaker 1>point one of a DD at some point down the

724
00:46:07.679 --> 00:46:11.079
<v Speaker 1>road that will never happen. And so by the time

725
00:46:11.159 --> 00:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the sprunces were starting to be decommissioned, they were full

726
00:46:13.960 --> 00:46:18.360
<v Speaker 1>up with vlsls and weapons systems. They filled up all

727
00:46:18.440 --> 00:46:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the gaps just fine. And on the bridge side of

728
00:46:21.920 --> 00:46:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the house, I would argue a very successful classes ship

729
00:46:25.960 --> 00:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>your type twenty three frigates, I believe sufferers. Now it's

730
00:46:30.440 --> 00:46:33.280
<v Speaker 1>been upgraded and added on so much that it's kind

731
00:46:33.280 --> 00:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of like the HMS Hood becoming almost semi submersible. It's

732
00:46:37.000 --> 00:46:39.519
<v Speaker 1>taken on so much additional weight. And here with the

733
00:46:39.559 --> 00:46:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Constellation we don't even have a whole one commission. And

734
00:46:43.280 --> 00:46:47.079
<v Speaker 1>yet it is again in your article, yet twenty three

735
00:46:47.119 --> 00:46:50.559
<v Speaker 1>feet longer and five hundred tons heavier than the original.

736
00:46:51.440 --> 00:46:53.679
<v Speaker 1>What we do know, there's a lot we don't know

737
00:46:53.679 --> 00:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>about the future, but one thing we can almost guarantee

738
00:46:57.119 --> 00:47:02.079
<v Speaker 1>is we're going to need extra whites and spare displacement

739
00:47:02.159 --> 00:47:04.639
<v Speaker 1>to bring on those systems that maybe we don't fully

740
00:47:04.679 --> 00:47:07.239
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the requirement in twenty twenty four, but in twenty

741
00:47:07.280 --> 00:47:09.599
<v Speaker 1>thirty three you probably want to be able to put

742
00:47:09.639 --> 00:47:10.079
<v Speaker 1>that on.

743
00:47:10.159 --> 00:47:10.440
<v Speaker 3>There.

744
00:47:11.079 --> 00:47:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Is that a legitimate concern that people should also have

745
00:47:14.519 --> 00:47:18.159
<v Speaker 1>about the constellation classes. We've managed to engineer to the

746
00:47:18.159 --> 00:47:20.519
<v Speaker 1>point that there's no.

747
00:47:21.800 --> 00:47:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Exp I absolutely agree with you, sal but I'm very

748
00:47:26.440 --> 00:47:29.199
<v Speaker 2>worried that if we start suggesting that they're just going

749
00:47:29.239 --> 00:47:33.119
<v Speaker 2>to add another sixteen feet on to it to have

750
00:47:33.199 --> 00:47:36.639
<v Speaker 2>some empty space off the bow, and it will end

751
00:47:36.719 --> 00:47:40.280
<v Speaker 2>up being even longer than it is now. It's the

752
00:47:40.320 --> 00:47:43.039
<v Speaker 2>concept where we in the UK we call it building four,

753
00:47:43.119 --> 00:47:47.119
<v Speaker 2>but not with So you have the four for the capability,

754
00:47:47.159 --> 00:47:49.719
<v Speaker 2>but you don't have it there at the beginning. And

755
00:47:49.760 --> 00:47:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that is really important to have the flexibility to be

756
00:47:52.000 --> 00:47:56.320
<v Speaker 2>able to add capability in and it's what gives these

757
00:47:56.320 --> 00:47:59.280
<v Speaker 2>ships their length of life, which is very very important.

758
00:48:00.239 --> 00:48:04.679
<v Speaker 2>But that again could be potentially solved by having more

759
00:48:04.719 --> 00:48:07.920
<v Speaker 2>of this iteration that we were talking about. So if

760
00:48:07.960 --> 00:48:12.679
<v Speaker 2>you had your flight one constellations, for example, and then

761
00:48:12.920 --> 00:48:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the you know, something changed in a capability, and then

762
00:48:16.960 --> 00:48:20.960
<v Speaker 2>you could take something out and put something in for

763
00:48:21.119 --> 00:48:24.559
<v Speaker 2>the flight twos of the Constellation class, and do that

764
00:48:24.599 --> 00:48:28.639
<v Speaker 2>again with the flight threes. So it's not necessarily that

765
00:48:28.679 --> 00:48:33.760
<v Speaker 2>you have to leave space for every possible capability, because

766
00:48:33.800 --> 00:48:38.639
<v Speaker 2>that could come at a cost of making the ships

767
00:48:38.639 --> 00:48:42.039
<v Speaker 2>too big. But it is important to be able to

768
00:48:42.159 --> 00:48:46.079
<v Speaker 2>have the flexibility with huge capabilities. But I think that

769
00:48:46.119 --> 00:48:52.199
<v Speaker 2>can be achieved by replacing things rather than adding them on,

770
00:48:52.800 --> 00:48:54.920
<v Speaker 2>because then again, you get to this point where this

771
00:48:55.039 --> 00:48:57.400
<v Speaker 2>ship is expected to do everything because hey, we've got

772
00:48:57.400 --> 00:49:00.440
<v Speaker 2>this cool new via less capability, let's just whack that

773
00:49:00.519 --> 00:49:03.280
<v Speaker 2>on the constellations for no reason, and you know, it

774
00:49:03.280 --> 00:49:08.039
<v Speaker 2>could become another excuse for things to be overdesigned and

775
00:49:08.280 --> 00:49:09.000
<v Speaker 2>far too heavy.

776
00:49:11.639 --> 00:49:14.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's there's a picture somewhere one of

777
00:49:14.199 --> 00:49:15.599
<v Speaker 4>the Burke class.

778
00:49:17.119 --> 00:49:18.519
<v Speaker 3>DDGs. It's got.

779
00:49:20.280 --> 00:49:23.000
<v Speaker 4>It looks like a chipmunk, but it's with its cheeks

780
00:49:23.039 --> 00:49:27.239
<v Speaker 4>full of peanuts or something. It's bulged out as they

781
00:49:27.280 --> 00:49:29.400
<v Speaker 4>added all this this stuff to it. You know, And

782
00:49:29.440 --> 00:49:33.599
<v Speaker 4>that's fine, it's an iteration and it's a way to experiment,

783
00:49:33.679 --> 00:49:36.519
<v Speaker 4>but you just you begin to wonder, how much how

784
00:49:36.519 --> 00:49:38.480
<v Speaker 4>can we not say if we're going to add something else,

785
00:49:38.519 --> 00:49:40.840
<v Speaker 4>something else. It's kind of like in your house. You

786
00:49:40.880 --> 00:49:43.159
<v Speaker 4>know you're supposed to before you bring something new, and

787
00:49:43.159 --> 00:49:45.679
<v Speaker 4>you're supposed to take something old out right? Is there

788
00:49:45.760 --> 00:49:48.079
<v Speaker 4>is there not a way we can design chips to

789
00:49:48.079 --> 00:49:53.599
<v Speaker 4>to accommodate new upgrades that but by by getting rid

790
00:49:53.599 --> 00:49:54.760
<v Speaker 4>of whatever they're replacing.

791
00:49:56.960 --> 00:49:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I don't really want the US Navy to be

792
00:49:59.199 --> 00:50:02.679
<v Speaker 2>taken into an episod hoarders and have to have their

793
00:50:02.840 --> 00:50:05.079
<v Speaker 2>below decks force to be cleared out of the twenty

794
00:50:05.199 --> 00:50:06.960
<v Speaker 2>year old stuff that they've been keeping.

795
00:50:10.800 --> 00:50:12.480
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, we used to look at the old

796
00:50:12.519 --> 00:50:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Union as the naval hoarders. They were those old

797
00:50:15.960 --> 00:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Whiskey class submarines that kept those to the very end.

798
00:50:18.599 --> 00:50:19.960
<v Speaker 1>They wouldn't decommission anything.

799
00:50:20.000 --> 00:50:20.320
<v Speaker 3>They would.

800
00:50:20.400 --> 00:50:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess something's got to absorb the torpedoes. We've been

801
00:50:26.800 --> 00:50:29.519
<v Speaker 1>talking a lot about the problems that we've experienced with

802
00:50:29.679 --> 00:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the Constellation class, which is the American version of the

803
00:50:33.440 --> 00:50:38.079
<v Speaker 1>FRIM which I always remind people it's an established and

804
00:50:38.320 --> 00:50:41.840
<v Speaker 1>successful frigate program. The last time I looked, we have

805
00:50:43.440 --> 00:50:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there are four nations that are going to

806
00:50:47.360 --> 00:50:50.800
<v Speaker 1>be getting frigates and two that are in build, one

807
00:50:50.800 --> 00:50:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of the two being the US. Having their own variant.

808
00:50:53.440 --> 00:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>France has eight, Italy has ten. The originally was going

809
00:50:56.920 --> 00:51:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to be four different variants, but nobody ever built land

810
00:51:00.320 --> 00:51:05.639
<v Speaker 1>attack variants. It's been a fairly successful program for the

811
00:51:05.679 --> 00:51:07.199
<v Speaker 1>French and Italians.

812
00:51:06.679 --> 00:51:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Haven't it.

813
00:51:08.840 --> 00:51:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely And this is one of the things that really

814
00:51:13.159 --> 00:51:16.159
<v Speaker 2>struck me when I was first researching about Constellation, because

815
00:51:16.199 --> 00:51:20.039
<v Speaker 2>I thought to myself, why would you not just buy friends.

816
00:51:20.920 --> 00:51:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure, like you need to make some changes for

817
00:51:24.039 --> 00:51:29.679
<v Speaker 2>the US Navy's particular requirements, but it seems like such

818
00:51:29.719 --> 00:51:34.400
<v Speaker 2>a good idea to buy something that is working and

819
00:51:34.440 --> 00:51:36.719
<v Speaker 2>then not mess around with it. And that just seemed

820
00:51:36.719 --> 00:51:39.719
<v Speaker 2>like a really simple idea and something that the US

821
00:51:39.800 --> 00:51:43.559
<v Speaker 2>Navy did intend to do. And then to have that

822
00:51:44.679 --> 00:51:48.360
<v Speaker 2>all of these problems with Constellation, yet for that not

823
00:51:48.440 --> 00:51:51.960
<v Speaker 2>to be caused by frem being a problem makes it,

824
00:51:52.280 --> 00:51:54.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, robs even more salt into the wound because

825
00:51:55.239 --> 00:51:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the French and the Italians are merely sailing around the

826
00:51:57.880 --> 00:52:01.800
<v Speaker 2>seas with their lovely frigates and America still has no frigates,

827
00:52:02.360 --> 00:52:04.519
<v Speaker 2>and it is just utterly frustrating.

828
00:52:07.800 --> 00:52:10.519
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm always reminded, what's the what's the story of

829
00:52:10.559 --> 00:52:13.320
<v Speaker 4>a horse? An elephant? Is a horse designed by a committee.

830
00:52:13.320 --> 00:52:15.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean that's kind of where we ended up with

831
00:52:15.159 --> 00:52:18.840
<v Speaker 4>this fram concept. Brilliant idea, could have could have worked,

832
00:52:19.119 --> 00:52:22.960
<v Speaker 4>should have worked. But I don't know if it was

833
00:52:23.000 --> 00:52:25.719
<v Speaker 4>just not invented here, or if somebody said, now we

834
00:52:26.039 --> 00:52:29.360
<v Speaker 4>can't you know, we've got to have this and uh,

835
00:52:29.440 --> 00:52:31.360
<v Speaker 4>and then you end up with, as you've already said,

836
00:52:31.400 --> 00:52:35.599
<v Speaker 4>a Frank, we're running up on time here. What what

837
00:52:35.679 --> 00:52:37.239
<v Speaker 4>are you being What are you going to be working

838
00:52:37.239 --> 00:52:39.519
<v Speaker 4>on in the future. I love the stuff you've been doing,

839
00:52:39.840 --> 00:52:41.360
<v Speaker 4>but what do you be working on in the future

840
00:52:41.400 --> 00:52:42.679
<v Speaker 4>or now that we're going to be able to see

841
00:52:42.719 --> 00:52:48.920
<v Speaker 4>here and about I'm sure more about naval matters.

842
00:52:48.920 --> 00:52:53.679
<v Speaker 2>So I'm currently working on a project to fix our

843
00:52:54.199 --> 00:52:58.440
<v Speaker 2>defense industrial base now that I've broadly criticized the American one.

844
00:52:58.519 --> 00:53:01.320
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I'm writing in projects about the shipyards and

845
00:53:01.440 --> 00:53:05.239
<v Speaker 2>supply chains in the United Kingdom. We have a defense

846
00:53:05.320 --> 00:53:08.599
<v Speaker 2>review with the new government coming in, so trying to

847
00:53:08.599 --> 00:53:12.239
<v Speaker 2>shape that to argue for more investment in our shipyards

848
00:53:13.239 --> 00:53:15.719
<v Speaker 2>given the problems that we're having with our shipyards at

849
00:53:15.760 --> 00:53:18.199
<v Speaker 2>the moment. I once again have a lot to write about,

850
00:53:19.199 --> 00:53:21.480
<v Speaker 2>so that should be quite a long project. I'll then

851
00:53:21.519 --> 00:53:24.880
<v Speaker 2>also be doing something specifically on the Royal Fleet Auxidiary

852
00:53:26.320 --> 00:53:29.760
<v Speaker 2>because my previous project in the role Maybe and the RFA,

853
00:53:30.360 --> 00:53:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the RFA has quite a lot of red flags at

854
00:53:32.800 --> 00:53:34.760
<v Speaker 2>the moment, so I'm going to be doing a deep

855
00:53:34.800 --> 00:53:38.599
<v Speaker 2>dive into the RFA because I think although obviously your

856
00:53:38.679 --> 00:53:42.039
<v Speaker 2>ships are not as sexy as their combat cousins, I

857
00:53:42.119 --> 00:53:45.880
<v Speaker 2>think they are widely important and I've become a big

858
00:53:45.920 --> 00:53:48.239
<v Speaker 2>fan of logistics. So that's my other one.

859
00:53:49.559 --> 00:53:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, I cyber stalk you over on next Are there

860
00:53:52.679 --> 00:53:55.280
<v Speaker 1>other locations people can keep an eye on you for

861
00:53:55.360 --> 00:53:58.840
<v Speaker 1>when you do push your latest work out there into

862
00:53:58.880 --> 00:54:03.079
<v Speaker 1>open source place where you usually hang your shingle as.

863
00:54:03.159 --> 00:54:05.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm also on linked In, but most of my work

864
00:54:05.800 --> 00:54:08.320
<v Speaker 2>is through my think tank, the Council on Geo Strategy,

865
00:54:08.480 --> 00:54:10.800
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of my maritime stuff that's coming up

866
00:54:10.840 --> 00:54:14.679
<v Speaker 2>will be published through them, and we have a newsletter

867
00:54:14.719 --> 00:54:16.800
<v Speaker 2>that you can sign up for which would have all

868
00:54:16.800 --> 00:54:18.719
<v Speaker 2>of my writing on it. But most of my stuff

869
00:54:18.760 --> 00:54:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I push our ex My dissertation is published, thank you, Paul,

870
00:54:24.119 --> 00:54:27.960
<v Speaker 2>and it is linked in. My pinned tweet or pinned

871
00:54:28.320 --> 00:54:33.800
<v Speaker 2>post or whatever is now on x via the British Library.

872
00:54:33.840 --> 00:54:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, perfect, and Emma, thank you very much for taking

873
00:54:36.440 --> 00:54:39.039
<v Speaker 1>time for what is evening time for you to come

874
00:54:39.119 --> 00:54:41.960
<v Speaker 1>join us. It's been a great hour and I'll look

875
00:54:42.000 --> 00:54:42.840
<v Speaker 1>forward to next time.

876
00:54:44.400 --> 00:54:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for having me back, and I'd

877
00:54:46.280 --> 00:54:47.079
<v Speaker 2>love to come on again.

878
00:54:48.360 --> 00:54:50.760
<v Speaker 1>It's always great to talk to you, and thank you

879
00:54:50.800 --> 00:54:53.159
<v Speaker 1>everybody for joining us for another edition of mid Rat

880
00:54:53.519 --> 00:54:55.719
<v Speaker 1>And until next time, I hope everybody has a great

881
00:54:55.800 --> 00:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Navy day.

882
00:54:56.639 --> 00:55:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Cheers, replied pad.

883
00:55:10.599 --> 00:55:15.599
<v Speaker 5>My lonely one to marry me and leave a friend

884
00:55:15.679 --> 00:55:21.360
<v Speaker 5>of Becrdily for you being to blame my love fly

885
00:55:21.599 --> 00:55:28.719
<v Speaker 5>to love me, silly faulting your the tame. It's a

886
00:55:28.920 --> 00:55:37.119
<v Speaker 5>long way to disper It's a long way. It's a

887
00:55:37.280 --> 00:55:47.679
<v Speaker 5>long way to dipper Ary, to the Queen Gorb BECRDI

888
00:55:49.599 --> 00:55:56.760
<v Speaker 5>farewell lestwell. It's a long long way to differate it.

889
00:55:57.199 --> 00:55:57.760
<v Speaker 2>But my

890
00:56:00.079 --> 00:56:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Ey
