Speaker 1: The stone Zone, entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: podcast network.
Speaker 2: Diving headfirst into the stone zone. If you love political
Speaker 2: theater and you're interested in justice, you had to be
Speaker 2: mesmerized by the performance of doctor Anthony Fauci, the COVID
Speaker 2: czar who repeatedly evoked the Fifth Amendment more than one
Speaker 2: hundred times before the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday
Speaker 2: to avoid giving honest testimony about his disgraceful and dishonest
Speaker 2: actions during the COVID nineteen pandemic. Questioned by Chairman Raan
Speaker 2: Paul about the origins of the China virus, the taxpayer
Speaker 2: funded Jaina function research, and deleted records, Fauci refused to answer.
Speaker 2: Now some have criticized Fauci, saying even when he was
Speaker 2: asked questions such as whether a folder was sitting on
Speaker 2: the desk before him, he stonewalked all questions. In all fairness,
Speaker 2: is important to understand that when one is legitimately using
Speaker 2: their Fifth Amendment right, asserting their Fifth Amendment right, you
Speaker 2: must answer all questions with the Fifth Amendment. You don't
Speaker 2: get to pick and choose which questions to answer and
Speaker 2: on which questions to assert the right. In the case
Speaker 2: of Faucci, however, there's a serious question as to whether
Speaker 2: he was entitled to use his Fifth Amendment right because
Speaker 2: he has a sweeping preemptive pardon that covers the period
Speaker 2: in question. Now, I want to be absolutely precise, and
Speaker 2: I want to be correct about this. When I went
Speaker 2: to the House Intelligence Committee, I did not assert my
Speaker 2: Fifth Amendment right in retrospective. If I knew that they
Speaker 2: were going to take immaterial answers and twist them into
Speaker 2: thought crimes or process crimes, I probably should have. When, however,
Speaker 2: I was subpoena by the January sixth Committee, and I
Speaker 2: realized that the January sixth Committee was not only illegally
Speaker 2: constituted refusing to take the appointees of the Republican Minority leader,
Speaker 2: that Cassidy Hutcheson, an aide to former White House Chief
Speaker 2: Mark Meadows, would fabricate taximony against me. When I learned
Speaker 2: that they would use both AI generated audios and videos
Speaker 2: to twist things that I had said or put words
Speaker 2: in my mouth that I never said at all. Yes,
Speaker 2: I asserted my Fifth Amendment rights. It does have legitimate purpose.
Speaker 2: But in this case, Rayan Paul argued that the pardon
Speaker 2: undercuts Fauci's claimed fear of self incrimination, while Fauci's lawyer
Speaker 2: suggested he could still face other legal exposure. Most interesting
Speaker 2: was the fact that his attorney repeatedly interrupted until Paul
Speaker 2: finally had the attorney removed from the air. If you
Speaker 2: watch this on TV, the lawyer was literally screaming and
Speaker 2: trying to stop the proceedings. Don't worry about doctor Fauci.
Speaker 2: He had six other lawyers there also representing them. Fauci now,
Speaker 2: of course, says the investigations political persecution. But his behavior
Speaker 2: looks incredibly suspicious, and I really see why. Sample one.
Speaker 2: In his private diary on March fifteen, twenty twenty, he wrote,
Speaker 2: and I quote, I spoke with Bill Deblasio, former mayor
Speaker 2: of New York, and convinced him, based on what I
Speaker 2: was saying publicly and my conversation tonight, to close the
Speaker 2: New York schools. In his public statement under oath, he said,
Speaker 2: show me a school that I shut down, show me
Speaker 2: a factory that I shut down. Never I never did.
Speaker 2: Sample two the lockdowns. In his private diary in March
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty, Fauncy recorded recommending the closure of schools, bars,
Speaker 2: and restaurants. He also wrote that he and others convinced
Speaker 2: President Trump to expend the federal mitigation guidelines from fifteen
Speaker 2: days to thirty days under oath. In public, he said,
Speaker 2: first of all, I didn't recommend locking anything down. That's perjury.
Speaker 2: Sample number three face masks. In his public statement, he
Speaker 2: said on March eighth, twenty twenty, there's no reason to
Speaker 2: be walking around with a mask. In his private diary
Speaker 2: in spring of twenty twenty, Fauci wrote, we probably were
Speaker 2: too strong as saying masks do not work. Sample number four.
Speaker 2: In his public statement of March twenty twenty, he said
Speaker 2: it's not providing the perfect protection that people think it is.
Speaker 2: In his public testimony, he said, there's no doubt that
Speaker 2: wearing masks protects you. That's June of twenty twenty. Example
Speaker 2: number five. Why masks were initially discourage he says, and
Speaker 2: i'd quote in a public comment, there's no reason to
Speaker 2: be walking around with a mask. Later he publicly said.
Speaker 2: Fauci explained that earlier guidelines were influenced by concerns over
Speaker 2: preserving mask supplies for healthcare workers. Sample number six. The
Speaker 2: hand seafood market. In his private diary January twenty six,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, Fauci says the first in fact, was in
Speaker 2: early December and was not connected to the market. Now
Speaker 2: we know the market was not the source, it was
Speaker 2: the amplifier. Those are his own words that proves that
Speaker 2: he lied before the Senate committee chaired by Van Paul
Speaker 2: Sample number seven. Again, this has to do with the
Speaker 2: early laboratory origins and those conversations. His private diary January
Speaker 2: thirty first, twenty twenty, Fauci documented discussions with leading virologists
Speaker 2: regarding unusual circumstances of the SARS cove two and recorded
Speaker 2: that scenarios involving an accidental laboratory release were discussed. In
Speaker 2: one diary entry includes the following exact language either accidentally
Speaker 2: released or delivered release by a crazy personal lab the
Speaker 2: former being the most likely. But in public, Fauci repeatedly
Speaker 2: stated that the available scientific evidence favored a natural origin
Speaker 2: while investigations continued. Example number eight gain the function research
Speaker 2: and his sworn Senate testimony on May eleventh, twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: Fauci said the National Institute of Health has never, ever
Speaker 2: and does not now fund GAIN of function research in
Speaker 2: the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In his private diary, Fauci
Speaker 2: noted that certain experiments results could be interpreted by some
Speaker 2: as gain of function paid for by you and I
Speaker 2: the taxpayers. Sample number nine the gain of function definition.
Speaker 2: In the Senate testimony, Fauci said, the National Institute of
Speaker 2: Health has never, ever, and does not now fund gain
Speaker 2: of function research. Then on his congressional testimony in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four, he fudged, saying, well, gain of function is
Speaker 2: a very nebulous term. Then there's example number ten. Six
Speaker 2: feet of social distancing. Public guide uites put out by
Speaker 2: Fauci during the pandemic said promoted maintaining six feets of
Speaker 2: distance as a key mitigation measure, but in his congressional
Speaker 2: testimony he said it just sort of appeared. I was
Speaker 2: not aware of any studies. It was just an emperic
Speaker 2: decision that wasn't based on any data. Sample number eleven.
Speaker 2: Following the science in his public messaging, Fauci said pandemic
Speaker 2: policies were repeatedly presented as science based recommendations, but in
Speaker 2: his congressional testimony, I six with guidance, he said that
Speaker 2: was an empirical decision I was that was not based
Speaker 2: on data. Direct contradiction. Example number twelve heard immunity threshold.
Speaker 2: The early public estimate was put out by Fauci to
Speaker 2: be sixty to seven percent immunity. Then later his public
Speaker 2: estimate was approximately seventy five to eighty five percent, with
Speaker 2: later comments suggesting it could approach ninety percent. But later
Speaker 2: Fauci said acknowledged that his public statements evolved in part
Speaker 2: alongside increasing public willingness to receive the vaccination. Number thirteen
Speaker 2: school closings versus reopening. In his private diary, Fauci wrote,
Speaker 2: I convinced him, meaning the President the mayor to close
Speaker 2: the New York schools. Later in his diary he said
Speaker 2: I never said do not open the schools. He also wrote,
Speaker 2: we should have as a default position our attempt intention
Speaker 2: to open the schools sample number fourteen. In his private diary,
Speaker 2: throughout the pandemic, Fauci recorded a that he convinced Mayor
Speaker 2: Bill Deblasio to close the schools. He also said he
Speaker 2: influenced California officials through his public messaging to close the schools.
Speaker 2: He helped persuade President Trump to stain the mitigration messages,
Speaker 2: and he advised governors and senior government officials. Later in
Speaker 2: public he said, I never did I gave a public
Speaker 2: health recommendation, and people made a decision based on that.
Speaker 2: The documents that we have seeing release really leave a
Speaker 2: substantial number of unresolved questions, and Fauci's private understanding evolved
Speaker 2: differently than his public messaging. These dire entries certainly indicate
Speaker 2: that they did. Did his description of his own influence
Speaker 2: change after the pandemic? Were technical definitions used differently in
Speaker 2: public testimony than internal discussions. Were some public statements simplified
Speaker 2: in ways that omitted important uncertainty, Which important contradictions were
Speaker 2: explained by context, and which deserved further investigation. The diary
Speaker 2: does prove one record. Public interviews, Senate testimony, congressional hearings,
Speaker 2: and media appearances provide an entirely different view. The purpose
Speaker 2: of all these comparisons not to determine guilt or innocence,
Speaker 2: but does show you the discrepancies between what Fauci said
Speaker 2: in public and what he said in his diaries. Senator
Speaker 2: Josh Hawley confronted Fauci in the testimony today over his
Speaker 2: wealth and the celebrity accumulated while Americans lost loved ones, businesses, jobs, schooling,
Speaker 2: and basic freedoms during the pandemic. Hally accused Fauci of
Speaker 2: profiteering while families suffered, and demanded accountability for the policies
Speaker 2: he pushed that devastated our country. Fauci has consistently disputed
Speaker 2: claims that his agency funded the dangerous research in Who
Speaker 2: I Am, but the evidence shows the contrary. Americans have
Speaker 2: heard years of shifting explanations, their missing records, suppressed debate,
Speaker 2: and official evasions. The country deserves the whole truth about
Speaker 2: COVID's origins, federal funding, possible cover ups, and whether powerful
Speaker 2: officials misled Congress while escaping consequences. And when all is
Speaker 2: said and done, doctor Fauci, who I really think has
Speaker 2: truly earned the title of the American Mengala, deserves to
Speaker 2: be charged at a minimum for lying under oath to
Speaker 2: the Senate, at a maximum for crimes against humanity. The
Speaker 2: most disturbing thing about all of this, to me is
Speaker 2: the fact that doctor Fauci, who was really in love
Speaker 2: with his newfound celebrity. I'm working on a long piece
Speaker 2: about how he gushed about the fact that he become.
Speaker 2: It was named as the sexiest man alive. People came
Speaker 2: out with a Fauci bobblehead and he was being praised
Speaker 2: by Julia Roberts and Bad Pitt played him on Saturday
Speaker 2: Night Live, and Billy Crystal played him in a different
Speaker 2: skit on Saturday Night Live. This guy was in love
Speaker 2: with himself. But the most troubling thing about all of
Speaker 2: this is that doctor Fauci and his wife were quite
Speaker 2: legally allowed to make millions and millions of dollars off
Speaker 2: of the very vaccination they were seeking to make mandatory,
Speaker 2: but which nevertheless they convinced millions of Americans to take.
Speaker 2: To me, that should be a clear conflict of interest,
Speaker 2: that should be illegal. So not only do I believe
Speaker 2: that doctor Fauci is responsible for the deaths of literal
Speaker 2: hundreds of thousands of innocent people, but he and his wife,
Speaker 2: who's also a public health official in that time, made
Speaker 2: millions of dollars while others were suffering. Will anybody be charged?
Speaker 2: Will Fauci be charged? That remains to be seen. That,
Speaker 2: of course, is up to the Justice Department. Today's proceeding
Speaker 2: was a legislative proceeding, and it does speak volumes that
Speaker 2: Fauci pled the Fifth when he had no legal to do,
Speaker 2: no needle right nor necessity to do so again, even
Speaker 2: though his pardon is signed by an auto pen. There
Speaker 2: is no danger to self incrimination if you believe that
Speaker 2: that partner is legitimate. Will hold up in court. When
Speaker 2: we come back, we're going to talk about the ridiculous
Speaker 2: award by the New York Courts to E. Jean Carroll.
Speaker 2: That's the woman who claimed that Donald assaulted her in
Speaker 2: the women's dressing room and Bergdorf Goodman on Fifth Avenue.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of holes in that story. We'll get
Speaker 2: into it on the other side. Right here in the
Speaker 2: Stone Zone, I'm Roger Stone. You listening to the Red
Speaker 2: Apple Audio Networks. Whatever you do, don't go away.
Speaker 1: The Stone Zone entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: Podcast Network. This is the Stone Zone.
Speaker 2: Now get in a zone.
Speaker 1: It's the Stone Zone.
Speaker 2: A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going,
Speaker 2: and he's smart, and he's.
Speaker 1: Strong, and people love him.
Speaker 2: Not everybody, but people love him and respect him. Rogers Stone,
Speaker 2: where's Rogers?
Speaker 1: Here's Rogerstone.
Speaker 2: Welcome back into the Stone Zone. President Trump and the
Speaker 2: Justice Department are asking the US Supreme Court to review
Speaker 2: the ridiculous eighty three point three million dollar defamation verdict
Speaker 2: ordered to wacky during left wing writer e Jen Carrol.
Speaker 2: This is the case in which Egen Carrol falsely claims
Speaker 2: that President Donald Trump, as a private citizen, sexually assaulted
Speaker 2: her in the women's dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman, a
Speaker 2: high end department store on New York's Fifth Avenue. The
Speaker 2: President has flatly denied that it's very interesting that the
Speaker 2: Egen Carrol, a writer, said that she was wearing a
Speaker 2: particularly particular Diane von Furstenberg wrap around dress on the
Speaker 2: occasion that she was assaulted, even though she could never
Speaker 2: remember the actual date, when, in fact, that dress in
Speaker 2: which she was pictured on the cover of New York Magazine,
Speaker 2: it turns out, had not even been designed or produced
Speaker 2: at the time of the alleged incident. The President's was
Speaker 2: ultimately charged not with sexual assault, but with defamation. Those
Speaker 2: denials were issued through an official White House statement and
Speaker 2: in answers to reporters. The Justice Department argues that President
Speaker 2: Trump was acting within the scope of his presidential duties,
Speaker 2: meaning the federal government not personally and should have been
Speaker 2: substituted as a defendant under the Westfall Act, and this
Speaker 2: pertains to his specific denial of the earlier verdict. Former
Speaker 2: Attorney General Bill Barr, hardly a Trump ally, made that
Speaker 2: determination in twenty twenty, but Biden Attorney General Merrick Garland
Speaker 2: later withdrew it, allowing the lawsuit to proceed against Trump
Speaker 2: personally as part of the lawfare campaign meant to destroy
Speaker 2: President Trump's reputation following the election hest of twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: Attorney General Pambinni restored the certification in twenty twenty, but
Speaker 2: the Second Circuit rejected that move. Now, the administration says
Speaker 2: that ruling that ruling threatens the ability of future presidents
Speaker 2: to respond forcibly to attacks without facing crush personal liability.
Speaker 2: President Trump's private attorneys are also asking the justices to
Speaker 2: consider presidential immunity, arguing that the appeals court never decided
Speaker 2: whether his official statements were protected. So this is not
Speaker 2: nearly about one verdict. It's about whether a politically hostile
Speaker 2: court can punchie president personally for defending himself while in office.
Speaker 2: An eighty three point three million dollar judgment over official
Speaker 2: presidential mars is wildly excessive and carries consequences far beyond
Speaker 2: President Trump. Anyone who's observed Egene Carol can tell she's
Speaker 2: far from credible and this ruling is a complete farce.
Speaker 2: I very specifically remember her on CNN saying that she
Speaker 2: thought rape was sexy, and the host, of course, cut
Speaker 2: almost immediately to a commercial. The Supreme Court should take
Speaker 2: the case, should restore clear constitutional boundaries and prevent law
Speaker 2: fair from becoming a permit a weapon against elected presidents.
Speaker 2: There's also a question about whether Eging Carroll lied under
Speaker 2: oath about whether her lawsuit had been funded in advance
Speaker 2: by billionaire Reed Hoffman and associative Jeffrey Epstein, who visited
Speaker 2: the island many times. There is an open Justice Department
Speaker 2: investigation about whether Egan Carroll lied about that under oath.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the Stone Zone. I'm Roger Stone. Don't
Speaker 2: go away, because we'll be right back with more of
Speaker 2: today's politics.
Speaker 1: The Stone Zone entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: podcast networks yesterday.
Speaker 2: Right here in the Stone Zone, I said that Mayor
Speaker 2: Mandamie has no place at the September eleventh Memorial this
Speaker 2: year or any other year see. I think the twenty
Speaker 2: fifth anniversary of September eleventh's tariffs at taxes not a
Speaker 2: political rally, a campaign opportunity, or a stage upon which
Speaker 2: ambitious political officials should seek to rehabilitate their reputations. This
Speaker 2: is a sacred day of remembrance dedicated to the nearly
Speaker 2: three thousand innocent Americans murdered by Islamic terrorists, the first
Speaker 2: responders who ran towards the flames while others fled, the
Speaker 2: military men and women who answered the nation's call and
Speaker 2: the wars that followed, and the families whose lives were
Speaker 2: forever shattered. That day of memories belongs to them. It
Speaker 2: does not belong to politicians whose public record demonstrates repeated
Speaker 2: sympathy for those connected to the very ideology that produced
Speaker 2: the dead least attack in American history. So again I
Speaker 2: suggest that Mayor Rammandami stand down in his intention to
Speaker 2: come to that profound and important remembrance. Just today, I
Speaker 2: was contacted by a very prominent Democrat political consultant of
Speaker 2: some note who asked me if if I wanted to
Speaker 2: join him in an effort to recall Mayor mam Dami.
Speaker 2: An offer I must have read it was empty, by
Speaker 2: which I politely declined. You see, I think given the
Speaker 2: demographic change in New York City and the fact that
Speaker 2: a very substantial number of New York voters voting for
Speaker 2: Hope and Change without ever knowing exact policies they were
Speaker 2: voting for, would make a victory impossible. If you combine
Speaker 2: the vote of the Republican and nominee and the independent candidate,
Speaker 2: former Governor Andrew Cuomo, you do not get more votes
Speaker 2: than Zoram Ma'amdami. That tells you how hopeless the electoral
Speaker 2: situation is. New York City's social experiment is already drawing
Speaker 2: a legal backlash from the immigrant owned businesses. Mandami claims
Speaker 2: to champion. The Multicultural Business Coalition, representing fifty chambers of
Speaker 2: commerce and businesses across Asian, African, Caribbean, Hispanic, Middle Eastern
Speaker 2: and Jewish communities, has voted to sue the city of
Speaker 2: Ma'amdami's plan for taxpayer funded grosser stores. The mayor wants
Speaker 2: five city run supermarkets, one in each borough, sell basic
Speaker 2: foods at discount of roughly thirty percent. Small business owners
Speaker 2: are noting that this is a government subsidized mess that
Speaker 2: will result in their bottom lines being destroyed. The grocery
Speaker 2: store business is not that profitable to begin with, as
Speaker 2: John Katsmetides has pointed out, given the rising cost of foods.
Speaker 2: The proposed stores would operate on city property without paying rent,
Speaker 2: while private grocers and bodegas must cover rent, taxes, payroll insurance,
Speaker 2: and rising wholesale costs. Near the planned East Harlem location,
Speaker 2: several bodegas already serve a neighborhood, and dozens of grocery
Speaker 2: stores are within walking distances. The coalition chairman Frank Garcia said,
Speaker 2: Ma'amdommi has refused to even meet with the concerned merchants,
Speaker 2: as his far left ideology comes before the legitimate concerns
Speaker 2: of the people of New York. The group plans to
Speaker 2: raise one million dollars to fight the policy in court.
Speaker 2: When government enters the marketplace, politicians use tax money to
Speaker 2: undercut private businesses, then they claim that they're helping the
Speaker 2: very communities they're actually displacing. These minority business owners work
Speaker 2: their tails off for years to build successful businesses, and
Speaker 2: now the edicts of an arrogant socialist putting all of
Speaker 2: that in jeopardy. The way to bring food prices down
Speaker 2: is through free market competition, lower taxes, reduce regulations, safer streets,
Speaker 2: and reliable supply chains. New York's immigrant entrepreneurs deserve a
Speaker 2: fair market, as is anyone in this business. Taking into
Speaker 2: consideration food costs and of course, shoplifting in a soft
Speaker 2: on crime city, New York's immigrant entrepreneurs actually deserve a
Speaker 2: fair shape, not the mayor using our tax dollars to
Speaker 2: finance government stores that could put them out of business
Speaker 2: and destroy jobs. Meanwhile, President Trump is moving aggressively to
Speaker 2: protect consumers from higher energy costs that are derived from
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence. President Trump is moving to protect working Americans
Speaker 2: from being forced to subsidize big text artificial intelligence boom.
Speaker 2: The White House has expanded its rate payer protection Pledge,
Speaker 2: bringing twenty three governors in nearly two hundred utility companies
Speaker 2: and data center developers into an agreement design to keep
Speaker 2: massive new AI facilities from driving up household electricity bills.
Speaker 2: The principle here is pretty simple. It is that the
Speaker 2: companies who are building these power hungry data centers should
Speaker 2: pay the full cost of electricity, the generation, the transmission,
Speaker 2: the grid upgrades. They require Families, seniors, and small businesses
Speaker 2: should not be stuck with the electric bill. President Trump
Speaker 2: says that America must win the global AI war. He's
Speaker 2: right about that, especially against communist China. But unlike the
Speaker 2: Washington establishment's usual approach hand in corporation subsidies and passing
Speaker 2: the costs down to taxpayers, Trump plans depands that the
Speaker 2: industry carry its own weight. Expanded pledge reportedly covers utilities
Speaker 2: responsible for roughly eighty percent of America's electricity distribution. Major
Speaker 2: companies have committed to build, buying, or bring enough power
Speaker 2: to support their operations without shifting costs into ordinary customers.
Speaker 2: These data centers, by the way, don't have to look
Speaker 2: into the grid. Elon Musk just paid one billion dollars
Speaker 2: for a Jacksonville, Florida, bes generation company. There's a number
Speaker 2: of new startups out there that can produce energy from
Speaker 2: hydrogen as well as fossil fuels. Is theoretically possible that
Speaker 2: you could actually fuel one of these data centers without
Speaker 2: tapping into the grid at all. This pledge by the
Speaker 2: President is a good start, now must be effectuated by
Speaker 2: additional measures. In my view, Congress and state regulators should
Speaker 2: turn these promises into enforceable protections. But President Trump is
Speaker 2: right for setting an example. He's right. We have to
Speaker 2: unleash America innovation. We have to expand energy production. We
Speaker 2: do need to strengthen the grid, defend consumers from sneaky
Speaker 2: corporate welfare measures. This is the america first approach to
Speaker 2: the AI Revolution. Grow the economy, beat China, create jobs,
Speaker 2: and make sure families don't end up paying the higher
Speaker 2: electricity bills so big tech can exploit American citizens. Innovation
Speaker 2: should raise American living standards, but not punish American households
Speaker 2: with a higher cost of living. Meanwhile, the Democratic socials
Speaker 2: of America are no longer hiding their radical leftist agenda
Speaker 2: that will destroy the rule of law. Their newly released
Speaker 2: platform calls for dismantling core American institutions and replacing constitutional
Speaker 2: government would centralized socialist control. The Democrats socialis of America
Speaker 2: want to abolish the Senate and the Electoral College, replace
Speaker 2: the Presidency and the Supreme Court with bodies subordinate to Congress.
Speaker 2: They want to eliminate ice. They want to grant mass ambesty,
Speaker 2: eventually to abolish police departments and prisons entirely. The platform
Speaker 2: also demands public ownership of America's largest corporations, universal rent control,
Speaker 2: taxpayer funded healthcare and college cancellation of student debt and reparations,
Speaker 2: and a thirty two hour workweek with no reduction in PEG.
Speaker 2: We've already talked about their demands for free food in
Speaker 2: the or subsidized food in New York City. On national security,
Speaker 2: the group proposes defunding the Pentagon, closing overseas military bases,
Speaker 2: ending all aid to Israel, and weakening immigration force, while
Speaker 2: extending voting rights to permanent non citizen residents. The Democratic
Speaker 2: Socialis American national co chairman Meghan Roemer confirmed these positions
Speaker 2: during a television interview, offering Americans a remarkably clear look
Speaker 2: at what the socialist movement intends to accomplish. This cannot
Speaker 2: be dismissed as harmless campus radicalism. The DSA back candidates
Speaker 2: are increasingly running and winning on Democrat ballot lines and
Speaker 2: in primaries. It's not just in New York City but
Speaker 2: across the country as well. We saw a veteran congress
Speaker 2: congresswoman lose in Colorado only weeks ago. The upcoming mission
Speaker 2: in Senate primary will tell us much. That means that
Speaker 2: every Democrat candidate should be asked whether they support abousing
Speaker 2: the Senate, subordinating the Supreme Court, nationalizing major businesses, and
Speaker 2: eliminating the institutions responsible for enforcing the law and protecting
Speaker 2: the American people, America's constitutional system, free enterprise, secure borders,
Speaker 2: a strong military, and equal justice. To me, they're all
Speaker 2: worth defending. Only Maga Republicans right now have the courage
Speaker 2: to stand for these pillars of civilization during this precarious
Speaker 2: time when the extremists are on the march. As I've
Speaker 2: said many times, hear in the Stone Zone the old
Speaker 2: Democrat Party, the party of John F. Kennedy and Harry Truman.
Speaker 2: A Democrat party that believed in God, believed in capitalism,
Speaker 2: believed in free enterprise, believed in a strong national offense,
Speaker 2: and opposed communism is no longer. And if Dan Goldman,
Speaker 2: who's about as liberal Democrat as I can imagine, loses
Speaker 2: in Manhattan to a socialist candidate because Dan Goldman is
Speaker 2: too conservative for the seat, tells you a lot about
Speaker 2: where the Democrat Party is today. I don't think that
Speaker 2: this is just an aberration or an anomaly. I think
Speaker 2: that this is the wave of the future. For the
Speaker 2: Democrat Party, and as I've said here, the stone zone
Speaker 2: numerous times. If Aosa chooses to challenge Chuck Schumer for
Speaker 2: the US Senate, Chuck Schumer is toast. Meanwhile, New Jersey
Speaker 2: officials are stonewalling the Trump Justice Department after a software
Speaker 2: failure reportedly placed thousands of non citizens on the states
Speaker 2: voter rules. The Justice Department requested identify and registration records
Speaker 2: roughly six hundred people who told the Motor Vehicle Commission
Speaker 2: they were not American citizens but were registered to vote anyway.
Speaker 2: Governor Mikey Cheryl refused, claiming privacy law to prevent the
Speaker 2: state from releasing the information to the federal government. That
Speaker 2: response is really bizarre. When a government system is taken
Speaker 2: the registers in eligible voters and the state admits fewer
Speaker 2: that some of them cast ballots, the obvious response should
Speaker 2: be full transparency, immediate cooperation, and complete public accounting. Instead,
Speaker 2: New Jerseys withholding records from federal investigators while accusing the
Speaker 2: Trump administration of politicizing elections. Assistant at Chender General Harmeet Dillon,
Speaker 2: good friend of mine, says the state has a legal
Speaker 2: duty to keep ineligible people off of its voter rolls
Speaker 2: and vow the Department will pursue the information through lawful means.
Speaker 2: That means a lawsuit. State officials blame a software defect
Speaker 2: affecting applicants between June of twenty twenty three and June
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty four. The vendor involved, says New Jersey's
Speaker 2: Division of Elections remained responsible for validating eligibility. Either way,
Speaker 2: somebody failed and voters deserve answers. These blue states keep
Speaker 2: their voting roles dirty by design in order to facilitate fraud.
Speaker 2: This is at the heart of their scheme still elections.
Speaker 2: You see, if somebody on the voting role who is
Speaker 2: either ineligible or dead, or perhaps they never existed at all,
Speaker 2: that's an opportunity to mail in a mail in ballot.
Speaker 2: Trump Administration's driving a stake through the heart of their
Speaker 2: illicit program. By insisting that the voting roles are cleaned,
Speaker 2: They're making it clear that only citizens may vote in
Speaker 2: federal elections, and only through the aggressive enforcement of that
Speaker 2: basic rule can every lawful ballot be protected. Trump Administration's
Speaker 2: right to demand these records, accountability and stronger citizenship verification.
Speaker 2: New Jersey's refusal only deepens public suspicion. If officials truly
Speaker 2: believe this was an instant technical state, they should open
Speaker 2: them books, improve that cooperate with federal investigators, and remove
Speaker 2: every ineligible registration improvement. But Mikey Cheryl appointing an establishment
Speaker 2: public Republican as a special prosecutor special investigator stinks to
Speaker 2: me of a cover up. People of New Jersey, the
Speaker 2: people of the Garden State, have every right to know
Speaker 2: the truth about whether the voting lists in that state
Speaker 2: were willfully opened to people ineligible to vote. I think
Speaker 2: it was a New Jersey where Boss Haig of Jersey
Speaker 2: City said, plan your work and work your plan. When
Speaker 2: I say that, what I'm saying is, I don't think
Speaker 2: this was a glitch. I think this was purposeful. We
Speaker 2: see it in multiple states. This is why we need
Speaker 2: the Safe Act. By the way, the Safe Act still
Speaker 2: started in the US Senate as the Senator John Thune,
Speaker 2: Senate Majority Leader Rush is to get out of town
Speaker 2: without taking action. For those who are unfamiliar, the Safe
Speaker 2: Act is really quite simple. All it says is that
Speaker 2: one must be as of the United States and one
Speaker 2: must be able to produce a photo ID in order
Speaker 2: to be able to vote. Recent repole by McLaughlan and
Speaker 2: associates showed that some eighty seven percent of the American people,
Speaker 2: including a majority of Democrats in overwhelming majority of Independence,
Speaker 2: support this simple provision. Yet it takes sixty votes in
Speaker 2: the USN to break the filibuster rule and bring this
Speaker 2: to a vote. I do think fifty votes exist. I
Speaker 2: think fifty one if you included a tie breaking vote
Speaker 2: by Vice President jd. Vance. There's something wrong with the
Speaker 2: Republican leadership when they refuse to bring this vital matter
Speaker 2: to the floor, and I think it is one of
Speaker 2: the keys to ensure that the twenty twenty sixth election
Speaker 2: is free, fair and honest.
Speaker 1: The Stone Zone entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 1: podcast networks.
Speaker 2: He's kept going, and he's smart, and he's strong.
Speaker 1: And people love him.
Speaker 2: Not everybody, but people love him in respective Roger Stone.
Speaker 1: Where's Here's Roger Stone.
Speaker 2: Welcome back into the Stone Zone. Ohio's Republican Governor Mike DeWine,
Speaker 2: who I refer to as Little Mike DeWine, is facing
Speaker 2: fierce backlash after opposing President Trump's decision to end Temporary
Speaker 2: Protected Status, or TPS. For roughly thirty thousand Haitian immigrants
Speaker 2: living in Ohio. These people are in the country illegally.
Speaker 2: Towine argues that returning them to hate he would be dangerous.
Speaker 2: He says that many have helped fill jobs revive communities
Speaker 2: such as Springfield, Ohio. I think most of us remember
Speaker 2: the scandal where Haitians were reportedly eating dogs in the
Speaker 2: Ohio streets. Perhaps this is the type of computer community
Speaker 2: in richment that the Rhino Governor de Wine wishes to preserve.
Speaker 2: I knew him when he was attorney general. He's about
Speaker 2: five point three. But the American the Trump administration is
Speaker 2: standing by the basically consistent principle the temporary status must
Speaker 2: actually be temporary. See The Department of Homeland Security says
Speaker 2: that the TPS was never intended to become a permanent,
Speaker 2: backdoor amnesty program. It was created for short term emergencies
Speaker 2: such as wars or natural disasters, not as an indefinite
Speaker 2: substitute for lawful immigration. President Trump's policy restores meaning to
Speaker 2: the law and ends a loophole that is contributing to
Speaker 2: America's demographic collapse. The decision to return over one hundred
Speaker 2: and eighty thousand Haitians in the country illegally to their
Speaker 2: homeland was upheld recently by the federal courts. A nation
Speaker 2: that continually extends to these temporary projections, regardless of change
Speaker 2: of circumstances or congressional intent, eventually loses control of its
Speaker 2: immigration system. And that is exactly what happened to America
Speaker 2: before President Trump came back to power. Compassion does not
Speaker 2: require abandon our sovereignty. Americans can recognize Haiti's instability while
Speaker 2: still enforcing its own laws, securing our borders, and assists
Speaker 2: in the immigration decisions serve the national interest. To Wine's
Speaker 2: concern for workers and local employers is largely hogwashed. He's
Speaker 2: frankly just another week Republican owned by the amnesty lobby
Speaker 2: that wants to under American wages. See these Asian workers
Speaker 2: will work for less. President Trump was elected to shut
Speaker 2: the door on this type of Republicanism. The Republican Party
Speaker 2: is an America First Party, now no longer the party
Speaker 2: of Wall Street or of the country clubs. Dwine can
Speaker 2: lobby for the Chamber of Commerce or take some coke
Speaker 2: bucks after his termment of office gone and quickly forgotten.
Speaker 2: But I don't see President Trump or the officials in
Speaker 2: his government, such as Steven Miller, backing down on the
Speaker 2: issue of the return of these Haitian immigrants. Meanwhile, the
Speaker 2: federal appeals courts delivered a major victory for religious victory,
Speaker 2: ruling that Kaiser Permanente wrongly dismissed an employee you refused
Speaker 2: a COVID nineteen vaccination because of her faith. Mimi Weiss
Speaker 2: worked for Kaiser for twenty years and was serving remotely
Speaker 2: as a senior managerial consult when the company imposed its
Speaker 2: vaccination mandate twenty twenty one. Weiss, a Christian of Jewish descent,
Speaker 2: promptly requested a religious exemption, explain that her beliefs prevented
Speaker 2: her from introducing foreign substances into what she considered her
Speaker 2: God created body temple. Kaiser initially approved the exemption, but
Speaker 2: after questioning whether some employees' requests were January, the company
Speaker 2: demanded that Weiss submit new answers and disclose more information
Speaker 2: about her religious practices. In other words, they harassed her.
Speaker 2: Once she declined to play along with the dog and
Speaker 2: Pony show, Kaiser placed her on unpaid lead and ultimately
Speaker 2: fired her. A lower court sided with the company. But now,
Speaker 2: in a stunning victory, the Ninth Circuit reversed, ruling that
Speaker 2: Weiss had provided enough information for Kaiser to understand the
Speaker 2: conflict between the mandate and her faith. The court also
Speaker 2: allowed her privacy claim to move forward. This ruling is
Speaker 2: a welcome rebuke to the authoritarian culture that flourished during
Speaker 2: the pandemic, when corporations and government officials often treated personal
Speaker 2: conscience and religious convictions as an inconvenience and they thought
Speaker 2: that religious liberty was optional. Big Pharma and bureaucrats like
Speaker 2: Fauci wanted to set the precedent that the right to
Speaker 2: refuse was no more that all must submit to the
Speaker 2: health dictats, regardless of how immoral, inhuman, or obscene any
Speaker 2: individual may have thought they were. Americans should never be
Speaker 2: forced to surrender their faith, their privacy, or their bodily
Speaker 2: autonomy to keep a job that is completely Unamerican and
Speaker 2: as abhorrent as the government attacking individuals for their personal choices.
Speaker 2: Decision does not erase the damage down to Mimi Weiss,
Speaker 2: but it sends a message that employers cannot interrogate workers
Speaker 2: about their religious beliefs, move the goalposts, and punish those
Speaker 2: who refused to comply with their madness. Thanks for joining
Speaker 2: us today in the Stone Zone until tomorrow, God bless
Speaker 2: you and godspeed.
Speaker 3: Thanks for listening to the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
Speaker 3: You can hear The Stone Zone with Roger Stone weeknights
Speaker 3: at eight on seventy seven WABC. If you like the podcast,
Speaker 3: share it with your friends and listen anytime at wabcradio
Speaker 3: dot com and download the WABC Radio app. Hit that
Speaker 3: subscribe button on all major podcast platforms. Plus, follow WABC
Speaker 3: on social on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and X see you
Speaker 3: next time for a new episode, so you never have
Speaker 3: to wonder
Speaker 2: What the heck is going on here.