Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, Telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's March the second you
Speaker 2: have our Lord, two thousand and twenty six. Well, March
Speaker 2: comes in like a lion, and we got a leader
Speaker 2: who is lion left and right, treachery, foreign and domestic lawlessness,
Speaker 2: mass murder coming from the executive I'm sorry, the emergency
Speaker 2: branch of government. This man is a one man fourth turning,
Speaker 2: kicking off global depression.
Speaker 3: And World war.
Speaker 2: Folks who knew, well, I think we could tell from
Speaker 2: twenty twenty what he was made of, what his agenda was,
Speaker 2: and now he's got the power to do it, and
Speaker 2: he's doing it. We're going to take a look at
Speaker 2: Trump's criminal, illegal, immoral mass murder.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back. Well, I put up.
Speaker 2: A substack comment about this because I didn't see anybody
Speaker 2: else talking about this. I said, where's my false flag?
Speaker 2: Don't I even get the Don't they even try anymore?
Speaker 2: Don't they even care if we have consent? Don't they
Speaker 2: even try to make a case. Well, no, they don't.
Speaker 2: Quite Frankly, the timing of this war really wasn't a
Speaker 2: surprise except for the false flag being missing. As I wrote,
Speaker 2: the timing of this war was no surprise. The Jerusalem
Speaker 2: Post had asked all four AI large language models on
Speaker 2: Wednesday when war would begin. It took a little bit
Speaker 2: of coaxing, if you remember, to get them to finally
Speaker 2: come up with the date. However, Groc immediately came up
Speaker 2: with February the twenty eighth, the day that Trump actually
Speaker 2: pulled the trigger. The others came up with dates that
Speaker 2: were between the twenty eighth and this coming Saturday. One
Speaker 2: of them said sometime between Wednesday and Friday. And I said,
Speaker 2: that's not going to happen. He's going to do it
Speaker 2: when the markets are closed. Just like Gerald Slinty said,
Speaker 2: we all know that we've seen the patterns before. We
Speaker 2: know these patterns. But part of the pattern is they
Speaker 2: always do a false flag. Where's my nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: where's my Gulf of Tonkin event? Don't you want to
Speaker 2: try to give me something to believe in? This is
Speaker 2: where we are folks that do whatever they wish. They
Speaker 2: don't care what the constitution says. Open defiance of the Constitution,
Speaker 2: Open defiance of the Geneva Convention. Open defiance are the
Speaker 2: laws of God almighty. That's what this Trump administration is,
Speaker 2: pure evil, no surprise. It'd be eager to start this sooner,
Speaker 2: right with all the pressures about the Epstein stuff and
Speaker 2: everything else, but it doesn't want to damage that precious
Speaker 2: dow at fifty thousand. You might have to investigate Epstein
Speaker 2: then at that point in time with Pamba. So for
Speaker 2: all the talk of timing and how the weapons systems
Speaker 2: of each side stack up against each other, my skepticism
Speaker 2: was that it wouldn't happen on the twenty eighth because
Speaker 2: they need to have a false flying event. Where's our
Speaker 2: false five? We got to start that as a sequence
Speaker 2: of events. Well, the question is, however, as I said
Speaker 2: in this article, I said, where's my nine to eleven?
Speaker 2: Should have guessed this from the testimony of women, that
Speaker 2: Trump is not into foreplay is a yeah. He just
Speaker 2: like he told Billy Bush to paraphrase that, Hey, if
Speaker 2: you're a Zionist, they just let you right, just get
Speaker 2: to do whatever you want. The question is, however, will
Speaker 2: the Pentagon and volunteer respect us in the morning. No,
Speaker 2: they will not, of course, And that's another aspect of this.
Speaker 2: We must not lose sight of this back and forth
Speaker 2: between warpeat Trump and Anthropic, which has the large language
Speaker 2: model Claude. This is really significant in a number of ways.
Speaker 2: First of all, the fact that the sticking point were
Speaker 2: the red lines and their ethics statements about not doing
Speaker 2: mass surveillance, not setting up Chinese style credit scores for people,
Speaker 2: and not using AI for autonomous killer weapons. These are
Speaker 2: important things to the Pentagon. That's enough for them to
Speaker 2: destroy to destroy Anthropic, And of course that's another issue.
Speaker 2: A lot of people and business are saying, you know,
Speaker 2: we're looking at very unusual things being done by the
Speaker 2: Trump administration. We've had unconstitutional bailouts of industries and companies
Speaker 2: in the past, and yet now what they're doing is
Speaker 2: they're taking active control of companies to actually be participatory
Speaker 2: in the management of the company and to decide what's
Speaker 2: going to be sold and what's not going to be sold.
Speaker 2: And of course now the vengeance, they said, well, we've
Speaker 2: really interwoven Anthropic into our systems, so if we have
Speaker 2: to get rid of them, it's going to be very painful,
Speaker 2: and we're going to make them pay a price. We're
Speaker 2: going to tell them they have to do whatever we
Speaker 2: want if we give them lawless orders. Remember all that
Speaker 2: about murdering people on ship on boats off the coast
Speaker 2: of Venezuela. Yeah, don't you dare tell the troops that
Speaker 2: they can't follow lawless orders. You know, it's the simplest
Speaker 2: thing in the world for Warpete and the Pentagon to
Speaker 2: say we didn't give them lawless orders. And of course,
Speaker 2: when push comes to shove, Mark Kelly and is a
Speaker 2: co sponsor, backed off of that. I can't think of
Speaker 2: anything lawless that they did. Really, you're not thinking too hard,
Speaker 2: are you, except that you want those same powers when
Speaker 2: your party gets in power, when you become president. He's
Speaker 2: got presidential aspirations. He would love to do exactly the
Speaker 2: same stuff. Don't fool yourself, Mark Kelly is no better.
Speaker 2: If you can't find lawless actions. And what was happening
Speaker 2: in Venezuela, you're just not paying attention or you're lying
Speaker 2: through your teeth. And so they don't care about lawless actions.
Speaker 2: A matter of fact, they want anthropic to do lawless actions.
Speaker 2: Good for them for not doing it. And of course
Speaker 2: Sam Altman, who will do anything to ingratiate himself anything
Speaker 2: for money and power. He's their go to guy, this
Speaker 2: despicable character. The first time I saw him was when
Speaker 2: he had that ORB thing that he came up with
Speaker 2: a he invented a cryptocurrency which had absolutely no value.
Speaker 2: And if you would voluntarily give him your biometrics by
Speaker 2: looking into this ORB, what a metaphor. If you would
Speaker 2: give up your biometric information look into that ORB, he
Speaker 2: would give you a little bit of his worthless crypto currency,
Speaker 2: as he puts you. As he builds a global database
Speaker 2: of people. What an evil person Sam Altman is. He's
Speaker 2: going to make Bill Gates look good. I tell you
Speaker 2: you just wait and see. We haven't seen the last
Speaker 2: of Sam Altman. And so what is going on with
Speaker 2: Pentagon and Pallanteer and these large language models is very instructive.
Speaker 2: It tells you what the goal of the police surveillance
Speaker 2: state is. It tells you what the goal of the
Speaker 2: Trump administration is, and it tells you why they are
Speaker 2: so adamant that there'll be no regulations of AI. You know,
Speaker 2: they're coming back and saying, well, it's not about that
Speaker 2: at all. It's just that we wanted the principle that
Speaker 2: they would do whatever we have to say, regardless of
Speaker 2: whether it's legal, regardless of whether it's ethical. You do
Speaker 2: whatever we're going to say. You make that agreement. Now,
Speaker 2: I'm not saying I'm going to ask you to do
Speaker 2: anything us or an ethical who would ever think that
Speaker 2: that is something that they would ever ask us to do.
Speaker 2: But I just want to establish the principle that you
Speaker 2: have no legal restraints. I have no legal restraints, and
Speaker 2: you're not going to be restrained in what I tell
Speaker 2: you to do. You're not going to come back in
Speaker 2: question whether it's legal or moral. Right. That's what so
Speaker 2: called Christian air quote Christian Pete hegseth once disgusting, such
Speaker 2: a disgusting. He's a trader to Christ, the same as
Speaker 2: Mike Huckabee is a trader to Christ and to this
Speaker 2: country and to the principles both of them. And so
Speaker 2: the question is, well they respect us in the morning.
Speaker 2: Of course they will not. They've already made it clear
Speaker 2: when they divorced Anthropic that the weapons of war abroad
Speaker 2: will become instruments of tyranny at home. The Pentagon has
Speaker 2: publicly decided that mass valance of the American public is
Speaker 2: viewed by them as a core mission that lawless, illegal
Speaker 2: orders and moral orders are a core mission of our Pentagon.
Speaker 2: Let's start calling it the Pentagram if you want to
Speaker 2: embrace Satanic values. Just amazing. The Pentagon has publicly declared
Speaker 2: this to be their core mission. The very reason they
Speaker 2: gave for rejecting Anthropic was that Nthropic has in its
Speaker 2: mission statement a rejection of domestic surveillance and autonomous killing machines,
Speaker 2: which are arguably more dangerous than nuclear weapons, and we
Speaker 2: have no known way of controlling them. I've been talking
Speaker 2: about this for over a decade. It's like twelve years.
Speaker 2: I think it was like going back to some of
Speaker 2: the interviews that I had with Nobel Sharky who put
Speaker 2: this together, and I've talked to what is a guy's name,
Speaker 2: Brad Share, I think Charre is his last name. He
Speaker 2: wrote the book for Battleground and it was about the
Speaker 2: war gaming that's going on the Pentagon and the military
Speaker 2: industrial complex. I guess we should call it the Machiabellian
Speaker 2: industrial complex. They were talking about the race of artificial
Speaker 2: intelligence with China and what do we do with that,
Speaker 2: and of course he openly admits that having autonomous killer
Speaker 2: weapons is a very dodging proposition. How do we stop it? Once?
Speaker 2: We have to? Once we set these things up, and
Speaker 2: both sides, the Chinese have got theirs, we got ours.
Speaker 2: If you don't give firepower to your autonomous weapons, you're
Speaker 2: going to lose. If you've got humans in the loop,
Speaker 2: they're slow and so your side is going to lose.
Speaker 2: So you have to turn all this over to them.
Speaker 2: Once you turn it over, how do you stop it?
Speaker 2: What stops it? Well, we don't know yet, but we're
Speaker 2: going to do it anyway. Right, so we know what
Speaker 2: the Pentagon and Letho Pete are going with all this stuff.
Speaker 2: Panthropic won't aid the exploding police surveillance dystopian state that
Speaker 2: Trump and the Pentagon demand, then Anthropic must be put
Speaker 2: out of business. Think about that. You are the enemy
Speaker 2: of a Pentagon, you and I, not just the Iyahtola.
Speaker 2: And by the way, the Iatola was just an adverse
Speaker 2: effect of an injection, an injection of a king into
Speaker 2: Iranian politics and government. That was a coup that was
Speaker 2: done in nineteen fifty three, seventy three years ago. We
Speaker 2: injected the Ayatola. We injected the king, and the Iatola
Speaker 2: was the adverse effect. The CIA overthrew a democratically elected president,
Speaker 2: installed a king and Iran in nineteen fifty three, along
Speaker 2: with a CIA MASSAD trained secret police and intelligence agency.
Speaker 2: The brutal and evil survived, a creature of the CIA
Speaker 2: and Massade created in their image. That, Folks, is the
Speaker 2: history of Iran, and yet here is Donald Trump's history.
Speaker 4: Forty seven years, the Iranian regime has chanted death to
Speaker 4: America and waged an ending campaign of bloodshed and mass murder,
Speaker 4: targeting the United States, our troops, and the innocent people
Speaker 4: in many many countries.
Speaker 3: Among the regime's.
Speaker 4: Very first acts was to back a violent takeover of
Speaker 4: the US embassy in Tehran, holding dozens of American hostages
Speaker 4: for four hundred and forty four days. In nineteen eighty three,
Speaker 4: Irans proxies carried out the Marine Barracks bombing in Beirut
Speaker 4: that killed two hundred and forty one American military personnel.
Speaker 2: And Ronald Reagan had the good sense to get out.
Speaker 2: He said, these people are crazy. Let's stop playing this game.
Speaker 2: Let's go back to ok seventy three year years ago.
Speaker 2: We overthrew their government. We put in the Shaw, you
Speaker 2: know the Shaw really means. It means king. It's Persian
Speaker 2: for king. We overthrew a democratically elected government. Talk about
Speaker 2: consent of the government of the government. Brother, On this
Speaker 2: twur and fiftieth anniversary of the declaration of independence, we
Speaker 2: overthrew a democratically elected government, whether you like it or not,
Speaker 2: and we installed a king and the people who are
Speaker 2: doing it with a CIA along with a Masad. They
Speaker 2: didn't start chanting death to America, death to Israel and
Speaker 2: the little Satan big Satan stuff until about twenty five
Speaker 2: thirty years later. What took them so long? That's what
Speaker 2: I don't understand. So think about all this on the
Speaker 2: two hund and fiftieth anniversary of the decoration of Independence.
Speaker 2: Think about what your country has become. How has it
Speaker 2: been subverted by evil men and evil institutions. As we
Speaker 2: put ourselves on the pat ourselves, they should say on
Speaker 2: the back, for our freedoms and our rights and our
Speaker 2: consent of the governed. Ask yourself if today the CIA
Speaker 2: and Masade are better than they were seventy three years ago.
Speaker 2: And we look at Epstein all the rest of them,
Speaker 2: we just understand what they're doing is they're perfecting They're evil.
Speaker 2: They're far worse than they were seventy three years ago.
Speaker 2: The Ayatollah was a bad reaction to an awful king.
Speaker 2: What bad reaction is America likely to have from this
Speaker 2: awful king? Trump and the world? I should say he
Speaker 2: aspires to be king of the world. I mean, that's
Speaker 2: what is a Board of Peace is really about. And
Speaker 2: I see a comment here from high Boost. I guess
Speaker 2: the Board of Peace isn't going so well. Yeah, it's
Speaker 2: really more like this court justter Lindsey Graham. Trump with
Speaker 2: his crown, and he's bored of peace breed. He's tired
Speaker 2: of it, absolutely tired of it. Well, the Trump and
Speaker 2: his Zionist masters went straight for the jugular in a
Speaker 2: decapitation strike, and our fellow Americans are disturbingly quiet about
Speaker 2: what has now become standard operating procedure attacking countries that
Speaker 2: have not attacked us. Let me just say this, Preemptive
Speaker 2: strikes are always immoral, always immoral, and usually illegal by
Speaker 2: international law. If that mattered. We called that infamy at
Speaker 2: pro Harbor, and yes it was regardless of what it
Speaker 2: preceded it. I mean, the Japanese had a lot more
Speaker 2: justification for what they did at Pro Harbor. As bad
Speaker 2: as it was, they had more justification than Trump has
Speaker 2: for this. They were one hundred percent dependent on foreign oil.
Speaker 2: We had stopped eighty percent of their will. As Gerald
Speaker 2: Clinty frequently points out, when you do economic sanctions of
Speaker 2: that nature, let's understand what sanctions are. Sanctions are an
Speaker 2: act of war. And I said this when Trump locked
Speaker 2: this country down in twenty twenty. I said, what we're
Speaker 2: seeing here is an economic sanction against main street, against
Speaker 2: mom and pop businesses, against the big box Wall Street
Speaker 2: retail of big box Wall Street retailers were on his side,
Speaker 2: and he was going to war for them, against the
Speaker 2: mom and pops and the main street businesses and everyday
Speaker 2: Americans who had voted for him. It was economic war,
Speaker 2: it was sanctions. It was a siege. You know, when
Speaker 2: you surround a castle and you cut off their supplies
Speaker 2: to starve them out. That is an act of war.
Speaker 2: And it shouldn't be a surprise if when you're threatening
Speaker 2: the existence of people, if you've got them backed into
Speaker 2: to a corner, it shouldn't be a surprise when they
Speaker 2: attack and respond to that existential threat. So the fact
Speaker 2: that he's doing this now is actually nothing new. And
Speaker 2: what is sad is that just as it all happened
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty and most Americans were silent, the media
Speaker 2: cheered it. The media got all caught up in the
Speaker 2: you know, the vaccines and the narrative about viruses and
Speaker 2: all the rest of the stuff. The media is caught
Speaker 2: up right now and whose missile system is it and
Speaker 2: who's prevailing with this, and what's the latest that we hear,
Speaker 2: and of course it's all controlled. There's news breaking today
Speaker 2: that some F fifteen's have been shot down, that being
Speaker 2: flown by Kuwait and support. Now the story comes out
Speaker 2: that they were shot down by friendly fire, mistaking them.
Speaker 2: I don't know about that. We can't tell. Truth is
Speaker 2: the first casualty of war. Nevertheless, there are going to
Speaker 2: be some casualties. And Trump was very casual about it,
Speaker 2: wasn't he He says he wasn't, but his actions say otherwise.
Speaker 2: So we are told that Iran is a terrorist state.
Speaker 2: He uses threats violence and threats of violence to achieve political, religious,
Speaker 2: and social goals. And that is the textbook definition of terrorism,
Speaker 2: isn't it? Iran does fit the bill? But doesn't that
Speaker 2: also describe the American regime. Never has our terrorism been
Speaker 2: more shameless than under Trump, both foreign and domestic. The
Speaker 2: Trump regime strives for conflict because it makes them feared.
Speaker 2: And isn't that the purpose of terrorism and the purpose
Speaker 2: of organized crime. Trump is a mafia don folks. That's
Speaker 2: the way he sees the world, whether he's dealing with
Speaker 2: people domestically, the other political party, the press, foreign countries.
Speaker 2: You must fear him, you must kiss the ring. Well,
Speaker 2: it won't end there. We can always dream of a
Speaker 2: better day, a better America. We can't dream whether we
Speaker 2: can dream of making America american, and again, we can
Speaker 2: strive for the ideals of America. The rule of law, freedom, dignity,
Speaker 2: peaceful commerce, and no foreign entanglements would be a good start.
Speaker 2: I'm not a pacifist. A just or justified war is
Speaker 2: a noble cause because what is it. It's not aggression,
Speaker 2: it's not attacks. It's defending innocent life from aggression from
Speaker 2: attacks from bad actors. And it's people putting their lives
Speaker 2: at risk to stop unprovoked, unjustified attacks by bad actors.
Speaker 2: In the same way that a fireman rushes into a
Speaker 2: burning building that may have been set on fire by
Speaker 2: an arsonist, or a police officer runs into a school
Speaker 2: to stop a shooter rather than running away from the
Speaker 2: school and hiding. That is what a just war is.
Speaker 2: It's putting on a uniform to identify yourself as a
Speaker 2: combatant in order to spare non combatants from being attacked.
Speaker 2: By the way, do you remember when we didn't target
Speaker 2: civilians in war. It was before most of us were born.
Speaker 2: Quite frankly, a just war is fighting to stop the
Speaker 2: violence that you did not start. It is fighting to
Speaker 2: preserve life. It is fighting to end war. That is
Speaker 2: the just purpose of war. That is the just purpose
Speaker 2: of the Department of Defense. They used to be called
Speaker 2: the Department of War. They cynically renamed it to the
Speaker 2: Department of Defense when their purpose was to preemptively start
Speaker 2: wars to attack civilian populations. So the first few generations
Speaker 2: of American leaders understood that we don't go abroad seeking
Speaker 2: monsters to destroy. Why is that? Because we become monsters
Speaker 2: when we do that. That is the nature of human nature.
Speaker 2: The lesson has been unlearned. Nothing the US government is
Speaker 2: doing is justified to this point. It is simply terrorism.
Speaker 2: And this last year we have seen kidnapping and murder
Speaker 2: for regime change, shooting survivors of a boat that we
Speaker 2: blew up without justification in the first place. We've seen
Speaker 2: threats to invade or economically destroy friendly nations just so
Speaker 2: that Trump can show how strong his regime is. It
Speaker 2: is ego politics, not geopolitics. That's just a few of
Speaker 2: these things. As I wrote, Trump is satanic, even apart
Speaker 2: from his Epstein debauchery, and Stephen Miller pee Wee German
Speaker 2: is the little Satan. We have to reject this criminal
Speaker 2: regime of terror, pillage, and intimidation. We need to remember
Speaker 2: that God is not mocked either that one way or
Speaker 2: the other. We will reap what they sow, even if
Speaker 2: we are not involved in it. They are leaders, and
Speaker 2: it disturbs me to see how many Americans are cheering
Speaker 2: this USA USA right now we are sowing in order
Speaker 2: to reap a whirlwind. The Bible is misquoted by a
Speaker 2: lot of politicians to say that God will bless those
Speaker 2: who bless Israel, curse those who curse Israel. No, he
Speaker 2: was talking to Abram personally. Look at the pronouns. We
Speaker 2: had pronouns and Hebrew, just as we had pronouns in
Speaker 2: Old English. You means a collection of people. The means
Speaker 2: the person, one person that you're talking to. Abraham, I
Speaker 2: will bless those who bless you, Abraham. I will curse
Speaker 2: those who curse you, Abraham. But through your seed singular,
Speaker 2: all nations will be blessed. What is that singular seed?
Speaker 2: The Lord Jesus Christ. Is that singular seed? Not net
Speaker 2: in Yahoo, not some political entity in the Middle East,
Speaker 2: not the Israeli government. So Lord Jesus Christ, and don't
Speaker 2: you dare substitute the Lord Jesus Christ Israel for the
Speaker 2: Lord Jesus Christ. What blessed me I see from these
Speaker 2: Zionist shells? I am discuss did with what I see
Speaker 2: with him? Jesus says that peacemakers are blessed. Jesus says
Speaker 2: peacemakers will be called the children of God. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact. Shortly before that, John the Baptist said
Speaker 2: to the Jews. He said, don't brag about the fact
Speaker 2: that Abraham is your father. God can raise up these
Speaker 2: stones to be his children, and God will raise up
Speaker 2: the peacemakers to be his children. You'll know his children
Speaker 2: by their actions. Peacemaker or warmonger. Nominal Christians need to
Speaker 2: stop cheering this warmongering by Israel. They need to learn
Speaker 2: to be peacemakers and ambassadors for Christ as well as
Speaker 2: Mike Huckabee for example, he has betrayed his office as
Speaker 2: ambassador for Christ as well as ambassador for America. Folks,
Speaker 2: it begins with us. Well, I have a lot that
Speaker 2: I want to say about this besides what is going on,
Speaker 2: and we'll catch up with what is happening this morning.
Speaker 2: But I'm going to take a breather right now and
Speaker 2: calm down a little bit. I've been pretty upset this
Speaker 2: entire weekend looking at this disgusting situation. I don't even
Speaker 2: know this country anymore.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the Day Night show.
Speaker 2: Abs, Oh, welcome back. I want to talk a little
Speaker 2: bit about what's happening this morning. Of course, we have
Speaker 2: the straight ofh Horr Moves was closed. Who had a
Speaker 2: couple of oil tankers that have been hit. We've had
Speaker 2: a Saudi Arabian oil refinery, one of the biggest, if
Speaker 2: not the biggest in their country, has been hit with drones,
Speaker 2: shutting the oil supply down, just closing forget about the
Speaker 2: oil refineries and the other types of attacks on infrastructure
Speaker 2: that are happening there. Just shutting down the strait of
Speaker 2: horror moves is going to be more disruptive, folks, in
Speaker 2: terms of the percentage of the world's oil supply. Then
Speaker 2: the OPEC embargo of nineteen seventy three, do you remember that,
Speaker 2: if you're old enough, you can't forget that. It's one
Speaker 2: of these things, like one of these lifetime events that
Speaker 2: you can't forget or can't forget the consequences of it either.
Speaker 2: How it affected our society, and you know, we were
Speaker 2: not really that dependent on foreign oil at the time,
Speaker 2: and it was only a small percentage of the fore
Speaker 2: and oil that we got as well. And yet look
Speaker 2: at the disruption that it caused in our country, and
Speaker 2: it caused a lot of disruption in other countries as well,
Speaker 2: because even though they didn't put an embargo on let's
Speaker 2: say Europe, for example, it was targeted to the US
Speaker 2: because US had supported Israel supported Israel in the Amkipor war,
Speaker 2: and so it was targeted towards the United States. But
Speaker 2: because of the impact, because we went on the market
Speaker 2: competing against other people to try to get the other
Speaker 2: oil that was on the national markets. It was felt worldwide.
Speaker 2: Now this is a situation where twenty percent of the
Speaker 2: world's oil flows through the Strait of our moves. Ran said,
Speaker 2: we just closed it. Let's see that orange pig open
Speaker 2: it if he can. Orange pig. Good description, But this
Speaker 2: is going to be very disruptive, and it is bigger
Speaker 2: than just the amount of oil going through the Straight
Speaker 2: of Hormuz. It's much bigger. What do you think is
Speaker 2: going to happen economically? When you look at the Opei
Speaker 2: oil embargo that kicked off stagflation, rapid inflation, stagnant economy,
Speaker 2: were already were looking at stagnation, recession, and possibly depression.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump is a one man fourth turning global depression,
Speaker 2: global war. Everything that he's done in the first year
Speaker 2: of this second term has been to fement conflict, needlessly conflict,
Speaker 2: even with Canada, all this nonsense about Greenland and on
Speaker 2: and on. He is not the peace president. He is
Speaker 2: the conflict president. And he does the same thing. Domestically.
Speaker 2: Something needed to be done about the open border, Something
Speaker 2: needed to be done about the welfare state and the
Speaker 2: corruption and the fraud involving people who came here illegally
Speaker 2: even people who came here legally. Something need to be
Speaker 2: done about that. Everything that he did was designed to
Speaker 2: throw gasoline on the dumpster fire that he inherited, and
Speaker 2: that's what he's doing now. And so when we look
Speaker 2: at what is happening, gold is up, Bitcoin is up,
Speaker 2: the markets are shaky and down. This could be a
Speaker 2: real turning point. It is absolutely reckless what he's doing.
Speaker 2: Just from that standpoint of course, money seems to be
Speaker 2: about the only thing that he cares about. But he's
Speaker 2: got a plan to make money out of this, you
Speaker 2: can be sure about that. Let's take a look at
Speaker 2: the betrayal. But actually got a couple of comments here,
Speaker 2: Audie mrr He says, our heroes in the military bombed
Speaker 2: a middle school in Iran over the weekend, killing over
Speaker 2: one hundred school girls USA, USA, USA. Actually it's one
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty three. And I've got some comments from
Speaker 2: Scott Ritter about that and something that he went through
Speaker 2: that was very similar. Unfortunately, DGA, thank you for the
Speaker 2: tippis that David. They needed Charlie Kirk out of the way.
Speaker 2: He was opposed to any war in Iran and he
Speaker 2: was leaving the Israel first agenda. Yep, that's right. That
Speaker 2: was in April, and I've got the clip of something
Speaker 2: he talked about. He questioned October the seventh, and he
Speaker 2: was told by top Jewish donors, no Tucker, no Candice,
Speaker 2: or they would defund TPUSA, and he was fine with that.
Speaker 2: David were getting too close to the Clintons, the Trump family, Lutnik,
Speaker 2: bb Aho, Barock, Bannon, Teal, Bill Gates, and the Epstein file.
Speaker 2: So it's time to wag the dog and deflect the attention. Absolutely.
Speaker 2: I agree with all of that that you're saying. And
Speaker 2: so the your strikes in Iran. The New American called
Speaker 2: it what it was, unconstantal and breaking of a major
Speaker 2: campaign promise by Trump of no more foreign wars. Trump
Speaker 2: broke a key campaign vow. And I would say, it's
Speaker 2: not just a campaign vows. He takes an oath to
Speaker 2: the Constitution. And I said this about Donnie the first
Speaker 2: time through. I said, what made anybody think this guy
Speaker 2: was going to keep his oath to the Constitution. He
Speaker 2: took an oath to love, honor, and obey and stick
Speaker 2: to his wives. He broke that over and over again.
Speaker 2: The Constitution. It's easier to break that than is to
Speaker 2: break the relationship that you've got with someone that you're
Speaker 2: very close to, is it. Trump said in a short
Speaker 2: speech that he wanted to protect American national security. No,
Speaker 2: this is not about the peace and safety of you
Speaker 2: and I. And that's what national security has become. National
Speaker 2: security has become antithetical to the peace and safety of Americans.
Speaker 2: National security is just another name for continuity of government, folks.
Speaker 2: Iran retaliated striking a headquarters USAW fifth Fleet in Bahrain
Speaker 2: and poured missiles into Israel. Iran also hit targets across
Speaker 2: the Middle East. Top Republicans rightly called the USAir raid
Speaker 2: on constitutional rights than New American The warplanes and the
Speaker 2: ships that are in the Middle East are part of
Speaker 2: the largest US military build up since the Iraq War
Speaker 2: in two thousand and three. Two aircraft carriers, a number
Speaker 2: of naval destroyers, and more than fifty fighter planes. Yeah, well,
Speaker 2: how did that Iraq war turn out? There's another quixotic
Speaker 2: quest about weapons of mass destruction? You know, Iran doesn't
Speaker 2: have nuclear weapons, just like Iraq didn't have weapons of
Speaker 2: mass destruction either, And it was all based on lies,
Speaker 2: based on lies from the CIA. We get lied into
Speaker 2: one war after the other, just like we're lied into
Speaker 2: a pandemic, and they use that to attack us chemically.
Speaker 2: Those missiles are scattered and launch sites across the roan
Speaker 2: where the first targets. The US military facials said, Trump
Speaker 2: gave an eight minute speech. That's it is that in
Speaker 2: the Constitution, before we go to war, the Trump, the
Speaker 2: president gives an eight minute speech or something. No debate,
Speaker 2: no discussion, no vote, just attack, And that means that
Speaker 2: there is no justification. This is unconstitutional, It is illegal,
Speaker 2: and it is also immoral. Should we dare say that?
Speaker 2: You know, that's the thing that is missing in everybody's discussion. Yes,
Speaker 2: we can talk about the practicality of this. Are we
Speaker 2: going to win the whatever winning means? You know, that's
Speaker 2: part of the issue. One of the reasons why you
Speaker 2: would have a discussion and a debate with Congress before
Speaker 2: you go to war. What does victory look like? What's
Speaker 2: the goal here? Are we going to try to stop
Speaker 2: a war that has started? Has somebody invaded somebody else
Speaker 2: somewhere else, and we got to tamp that down so
Speaker 2: we can get back to a state of peace. No, No,
Speaker 2: we're the ones who are starting all this stuff, So
Speaker 2: that's not on the table. What does victory look like?
Speaker 2: So Trump says, they're a vicious group of very hard,
Speaker 2: terrible people whose activities directly endangered the United States, our troops,
Speaker 2: our bases overseas, and our allies throughout the world. Well,
Speaker 2: I think the same thing could be said of the
Speaker 2: Trump regime that has said of the Iranian regimes. I said,
Speaker 2: the Trump regime is also a terrorist regime. Think about it.
Speaker 2: The Trump regime is a vicious group of very hard,
Speaker 2: terrible people. We've seen it in Venezuela, We've seen it
Speaker 2: in Minneapolis, We're seeing it now in Iran. Activities directly
Speaker 2: endangering the United States are troops and our bases overseas
Speaker 2: and our allies as well. Yeah, all that could be
Speaker 2: said of the Trump administration as well. Trump said the
Speaker 2: regime has chanted death to America for almost fifty years. Well,
Speaker 2: we overthrew their government seventy three years ago. What took
Speaker 2: them twenty three years to figure out that we're the
Speaker 2: great Satan? Hope you realize it. Anyway. His history lesson
Speaker 2: begins with the takeover of the US embassy in Tehran
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy nine and the taking of the American
Speaker 2: hostages who are held for forty four days. Well, let's
Speaker 2: talk about that. The hostages who were held for four
Speaker 2: hundred and forty four days. Why were they held for
Speaker 2: four and four days. Well, one of the founders of
Speaker 2: the CIA, Bill Casey, Wild Bill Casey, of the OSS
Speaker 2: that was created during World War Two, then it became
Speaker 2: the CIA. Wild Bill Casey was a campaign manager for
Speaker 2: Ronald Reagan. He was the one who put together the
Speaker 2: Iran Contra deal. Tell you what, you keep those hostages
Speaker 2: and don't release them even after the election. You keep
Speaker 2: them hostage. Don't release them until the day that Ronald
Speaker 2: Reagan has sworn in. If you do that, said wild
Speaker 2: Bill Casey to the Iranian Ayatola, he said, we will
Speaker 2: give you spare parts for all those jets that we
Speaker 2: gave to the SHAW And they did. That was the
Speaker 2: Iran Contra affair. And what did they do with that
Speaker 2: money that they got from the Iranians, Well, they started
Speaker 2: an illegal secret war in Central America as well. That
Speaker 2: was our government forty some odd years ago. So yeah,
Speaker 2: let's put a little bit of context there, because that
Speaker 2: context matters. It matters how the Iya totally got into power,
Speaker 2: and why it was blowback from what we had done.
Speaker 2: We had put in a horrific king who had a
Speaker 2: secret police and police surveillance state, and we had We
Speaker 2: were involved in what is the beginning of Iran in
Speaker 2: the American mind, and that is the takeover of the embassy.
Speaker 2: We were involved in extending that Ronald Reagan and a
Speaker 2: CIA from Lebanon to em and from Syria to Iraq.
Speaker 2: The regime has armed, trained, and funded terrorist militias, said
Speaker 2: Trump about Iran. Well, I would say that we've done
Speaker 2: the same thing with a much wider sweep. We've given
Speaker 2: money to al Qaeda, We've trained the muja Hadeen, which
Speaker 2: became al Qaeda. We've given money and arms to ISIS
Speaker 2: and so forth. Folks, we have done a lot more
Speaker 2: to train and fund al Qaeda and ISIS than Iran has.
Speaker 2: It's just like the war on drugs. We look at
Speaker 2: these drug cartels. Do you realize the CIA's role in
Speaker 2: all of this stuff. It's much more significant in terms
Speaker 2: of the war on drugs. So, yeah, Iran is the
Speaker 2: world's number one state sponsor of terrorism, said Trump. No,
Speaker 2: I disagree, I say you are you the American government? You,
Speaker 2: the president are the number one sponsor of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Trump said, the regime has rejected every opportunity to end
Speaker 2: their nuclear ambitions, and we can't take it anymore. This
Speaker 2: lying piece of filth said that he destroyed the nuclear weapon,
Speaker 2: and now here he is a couple of months later
Speaker 2: saying now we've got to destroy him. So when we line,
Speaker 2: was it then? Is it now? Is it both times?
Speaker 2: So when we look at this mafia action that is here,
Speaker 2: I always think of the back and forth that Jeff
Speaker 2: Sessions had with then the Chair of the Joint Chiefs
Speaker 2: of Staff and with the Secondary Defense at the time,
Speaker 2: lying Leon Panetta and Lion Panetta, and the arrogance of
Speaker 2: these guys and what their focus is. And I wanted
Speaker 2: you to hear just a little bit of it. It's
Speaker 2: very long, but I think you really need to hear this.
Speaker 2: And I had high expectations for Jeff Sessions because of
Speaker 2: this session. Now he was a little bit milk toast,
Speaker 2: I think in his response to them, but he was
Speaker 2: as outraged as Jeff Sessions can get. And in terms
Speaker 2: of the comments being made by Panetta and the others,
Speaker 2: in terms of what it takes to start a war.
Speaker 2: And yet Jeff Sessions, when he became Attorney General, was
Speaker 2: really not about the rule of law. He had his
Speaker 2: own little war that he wanted to fight, the War
Speaker 2: on drugs, which also was a UN war. He argues
Speaker 2: with Panetta, well, you know how this all works. You
Speaker 2: were a congressman. When'd you know that you don't get
Speaker 2: your authority from the UN to do a war. Well, center,
Speaker 2: we do, and we'll tell you what you know what
Speaker 2: we're going to do afterwards. But Jeff Sessions is pushing
Speaker 2: a UN agenda, a UN war of drugs. Yes, it
Speaker 2: was enacted by Richard Nixon, but all the schedule and
Speaker 2: everything else like that came from the United Nations, and
Speaker 2: he was willing to violate the Constitution in order to
Speaker 2: do that. And it's very clear all of America when
Speaker 2: the eighteenth Amendment was asked in the early twentieth century,
Speaker 2: when they did alcohol probation, all of America agreed that
Speaker 2: a constitutional amendment was necessary. The people who wanted probition,
Speaker 2: the people who opposed probation, they all agreed that a
Speaker 2: constitutional amendment was necessary. Where do you have the authority
Speaker 2: to do a war on drugs. Sorry, everybody throws the
Speaker 2: rule of law out the window for their particular cause,
Speaker 2: don't they. But here's this back and forth, and just
Speaker 2: pay attention to the attitude of Leon Panetta and all this,
Speaker 2: the smug attitude about all this. We'll do whatever we want. Senator,
Speaker 2: We'll let you know. He's not so dense that he
Speaker 2: doesn't know what Chef Sessions is getting at. It's just
Speaker 2: that he's arrogant. And it's the same kind of arrogance
Speaker 2: that has permeated our government and the Pentagon to this day.
Speaker 5: General Dempsey, you in one of your criteria for determining
Speaker 5: what we might do militarily, you say you have to
Speaker 5: ask the question of whether the action is worth the
Speaker 5: cost and is consistent with law. What law does the
Speaker 5: United States military look to?
Speaker 6: Yeah, if I could, since I'd like to address both
Speaker 6: because they are related. So cost, resources, risk incurred elsewhere
Speaker 6: by the use of force one other place. So you know,
Speaker 6: this is a zero sum game. We take them from
Speaker 6: someplace else, we use them for how long? And that's
Speaker 6: that's the kind of issue of cost, is it? And
Speaker 6: of course in blood and treasure, the issue of legal.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, talk about people losing their lives.
Speaker 6: You know, we again we act with the authorized used
Speaker 6: the military force either at the consent of a government,
Speaker 6: so we're invited in or out of national self defense,
Speaker 6: which and it's a very there's a very.
Speaker 3: Clear criteria for that.
Speaker 6: And then the last one is with some kind of
Speaker 6: international legal basis and unscureed Wait a.
Speaker 5: Minute, let's talk about an international legal basis. You answer
Speaker 5: under the Constitution to the United States.
Speaker 2: Government, do you not?
Speaker 5: And you don't need any international support before you would
Speaker 5: carry out a military operation authorized by the commander.
Speaker 6: And now, of course that's that's the second one.
Speaker 5: I want to know that because there's a lot of
Speaker 5: references in here to international matters before we make a decision,
Speaker 5: and I want to be sure that the United States
Speaker 5: military understands and I know you do that we're not
Speaker 5: dependent on a NATO resolution, are you in resolution? To
Speaker 5: execute policies consistent with the national security of the United States?
Speaker 7: Senator, when it comes to our national defense, you know,
Speaker 7: we act based on what on protecting this security of
Speaker 7: this country, and we don't look for permission from anybody
Speaker 7: else when it comes to our national defense. When it
Speaker 7: comes to the kind of military action where we want
Speaker 7: to build a coalition and work with our international partners,
Speaker 7: then obviously we would like to have some kind of
Speaker 7: legal basis on which to do it, as we did
Speaker 7: in Libya, and.
Speaker 2: That does good in Congress, some sort of legal basis.
Speaker 5: We worried about international legal basis, but nobody worried about
Speaker 5: the fundamental constitutional legal basis that this Congress has over war.
Speaker 5: We were not asked stunningly and direct violation of the
Speaker 5: War Powers Act. Whether or not you believe it's constitution,
Speaker 5: it certainly didn't comply with it. We spent our time
Speaker 5: worrying about the UN, the Arab League, NATO, and too
Speaker 5: little time, in my opinion, worried about the elected representatives
Speaker 5: of the United States. As you go forward, will you
Speaker 5: consult with the United States Congress? And can we be
Speaker 5: assured that you'll We'll have more consultation and more participation
Speaker 5: and legal authority from the nearly elected representatives.
Speaker 3: Will believe me, we will?
Speaker 7: We don't you know, we don't uh, we don't have
Speaker 7: a corner on the market with regards to uh, you know,
Speaker 7: issues involving our defense. We we want to consult with
Speaker 7: the Congress. We want to get your best advice and
Speaker 7: your guidance.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 7: And when we take action, we want to do it together.
Speaker 5: And do you think that you can act without Congress
Speaker 5: to and initiate a no fly zone in Syria without
Speaker 5: congressional approval?
Speaker 2: You know?
Speaker 7: Again?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 7: Our our goal would we do what we want to
Speaker 7: seek international permission, and we would we would come to
Speaker 7: the Congress and inform you, uh, and determine how best
Speaker 7: to approach this. Uh, whether or not we would want
Speaker 7: to get permission from the Congress. I think those are
Speaker 7: issues we would have to discuss as we decide what
Speaker 7: to do here.
Speaker 5: Well, I'm almost breathless about that, because what I heard
Speaker 5: you say is we're going to seek international approval and
Speaker 5: they will come and tell the Congress what we might do.
Speaker 2: And we might well have to thrk about it approval.
Speaker 5: Well, I want to just cite to you the Constitution
Speaker 5: you served in the Congress. Wouldn't you agree that that's
Speaker 5: would be pretty breathtaking to the average Americans? So would
Speaker 5: you like to clarify that?
Speaker 7: But I've uh, you know, we I've also served with
Speaker 7: Republican presidents and Democratic presidents who has always reserved the
Speaker 7: right to defend this country if necessary.
Speaker 2: What what entity?
Speaker 7: Well, obviously, if if NATO made the decision to go in,
Speaker 7: that would be one.
Speaker 8: Uh.
Speaker 7: If if we if we developed an international coalition beyond NATO,
Speaker 7: then obviously some kind of U. N Security Resolution coalition.
Speaker 2: And this goes on and on, and see what's happening.
Speaker 2: He clearly knows what just Sessions is getting at, and
Speaker 2: he clearly is going to repudiate anything that's in the
Speaker 2: Constitution that he swore an oath to hold as part
Speaker 2: of his taking office as a congressman, part of his
Speaker 2: taking office as a Secretary of Defense, and I think
Speaker 2: he was at the CIA as well. This is under Obama.
Speaker 2: And what was the immediate issue in this was putting
Speaker 2: a no fly zone over Syria, which is an act
Speaker 2: of war. And we had these discussions again when they
Speaker 2: went to put troops on the ground, Well they did
Speaker 2: put troops on the ground, and Trump left the troops
Speaker 2: on the ground in Syria and we had Americans killed
Speaker 2: on the ground in Syria. Nobody ever asked why are
Speaker 2: they there? By what authority are they there? They just
Speaker 2: did it anyway. You see, Trump, Obama, Panetta, they don't
Speaker 2: care about the Constitution. They've made it abundantly clear. It
Speaker 2: has absolutely nothing to do what they decided to do.
Speaker 2: Trump made that clear when his ry's reaction to the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court. He said, I can do whatever I want
Speaker 2: to do, and if I want to use these against
Speaker 2: the country, I can do it. I can destroy that
Speaker 2: country if I wish. That's right, because the power to
Speaker 2: tax is the power to destroy. Just understand, those taxes
Speaker 2: are not being paid by that country. They're being paid
Speaker 2: by you. Trump is destroying you with taxes. Well, we've
Speaker 2: seen this happening over and over again, and Trump was
Speaker 2: very vocal in terms of wanting to criticize Obama over
Speaker 2: waying to start a war with Iran. From twenty eleven,
Speaker 2: twelve thirteen, Over and over again, this is what Trump wrote, wrote,
Speaker 2: in order to get elected, Obama will start a war
Speaker 2: with Iran. Obama will attack Iran in order to get elected.
Speaker 2: That's another one that he put up. Then that's twenty eleven,
Speaker 2: twenty twelve. In twenty thirteen, he says, I predict Obama
Speaker 2: well at some point attack Iran in order to save face.
Speaker 2: Then twenty eleven, a couple months later, he says, remember
Speaker 2: that I predicted a long time ago that Obama will
Speaker 2: attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly. He's
Speaker 2: not skilled. Well, interestingly enough, Obama did not attack Iran.
Speaker 2: But by the way, you know, in terms of this
Speaker 2: no fly zone and troops on the ground and leaving
Speaker 2: troops on the ground, all the rest of stuff in Syria,
Speaker 2: the way the Syrian situation went, we were flying air
Speaker 2: support in defense of ISIS. You could see it with
Speaker 2: the a ten warthogs that were there the closing of
Speaker 2: that war as Saad was taken out of power. And
Speaker 2: who was that in support of this? Is in support
Speaker 2: of a group where the commander had been an alumni
Speaker 2: of Mujahideen, of al Qaeda, of Ice, of al Nuser.
Speaker 2: He's calling himself something different now. I don't know. They
Speaker 2: changed their name every few months, but it's the same
Speaker 2: people with the same purpose, and we were flying air
Speaker 2: support for them to overthrow Assad. You know, Trump has
Speaker 2: shown when he talks about Obama's going to go to
Speaker 2: war with Iran because he can't negotiate properly. Well, Trump
Speaker 2: had already decided he was going to go to war,
Speaker 2: and he was pretending to have negotiations and it was treachery,
Speaker 2: just like he did last summer when they did the bombing.
Speaker 2: You get the other side to think that you were
Speaker 2: negotiating with them in good faith, and then you do
Speaker 2: a sneak attack. Like I said before, this is beyond
Speaker 2: even the Japanese at Pearl Harbor the kind of treachery.
Speaker 2: And this is going to blow back if Trump ever
Speaker 2: wants to really do any negotiations. Who can trust him
Speaker 2: when he's doing this kind of stuff, And of course
Speaker 2: who can trust him anyway when he talks about how
Speaker 2: we're going to starve the warmongers.
Speaker 4: Just as importantly, bringing back empownerment will give us a
Speaker 4: crucial tool with which to obliterate the deep state, drain
Speaker 4: the swamp, and starve the warmongers. These people that want
Speaker 4: wars all over the place, killing.
Speaker 2: They're gorging themselves of mar Lago.
Speaker 4: Love killing, and the globalists out of our government. We're
Speaker 4: going to get the warmongers and the globalists out of
Speaker 4: our government.
Speaker 2: What a lying traitor Trump is. Jeffrey Sachs had this
Speaker 2: to say about what was going to happen with This.
Speaker 3: Has never been about nuclear weapons.
Speaker 8: This has been about Israel's regional hegemony in the Middle East.
Speaker 8: Israel wants to topple the Iranian regime period.
Speaker 3: It has said. So this is not a mystery, This
Speaker 3: is not my claim.
Speaker 8: This is Israeli policy repeated year in year out. The
Speaker 8: whole idea that Trump is negotiating to prevent Iran from
Speaker 8: getting a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 3: Uh, that was negotiated. Trump ripped it up.
Speaker 8: The Iranians have come back every year to say, we
Speaker 8: don't want a nuclear weapon, we want negotiations. The United
Speaker 8: States does not accept yes for an answer because it
Speaker 8: works for the government of Israel. This is the point.
Speaker 8: Why does it work for the government of Israel. It's
Speaker 8: a little hard to understand, maybe because it's of Mike
Speaker 8: Huckleby's parishioners, because of the people who read the Bible
Speaker 8: and say, okay, that's our foreign policy.
Speaker 3: That's possible.
Speaker 8: It may be because of what's in the eppspy files
Speaker 8: that haven't been released. It may be blackmail, it may
Speaker 8: be corruption, may be many other things.
Speaker 3: But it is not about America's interests.
Speaker 8: We have no interest whatsoever in going to a war
Speaker 8: with Iran right now. If there is such a war,
Speaker 8: it's a war because Israel has told the United States
Speaker 8: what to do. And that raises a question, why has
Speaker 8: the United States done what Israel has told the United
Speaker 8: States to do for thirty years? And I don't just
Speaker 8: mean about Iran, I mean across the Middle East.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Trump officials previously mocked opponents for wanting
Speaker 2: war in the Middle East. Well, if you vote for
Speaker 2: Biden or La La Harris or the Democrats, you're going
Speaker 2: to get war. You know, it's kind of interesting. Those
Speaker 2: One of the things that Julian Assange said about Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 2: he said, we know that Hillary Clinton is a warmonger
Speaker 2: and a crook. He said, we don't know about Donald
Speaker 2: Trump yet. Well, it didn't take too long to find out.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump is a warmonger. Donald Trump is a crook
Speaker 2: like we have never seen before. And of course he
Speaker 2: tried to kill Julian Osange in his fellow crooks and
Speaker 2: CIA followers. To anyone who's still vallible enough to fall
Speaker 2: for scummy media hoaxes, Trump said, warmongering, neo kon love,
Speaker 2: sending your kids to die for wars, they would never
Speaker 2: fight themselves. Who said that? Stephen Miller before the election?
Speaker 2: Pee wee German, He said, Liz Cheney is Kamala's top advisor.
Speaker 2: Liz wants to invade the whole Middle East. Kamala equals
Speaker 2: World War three, said Stephen Miller. Trump equals peace. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that guy is piece of work, and so it's kind
Speaker 2: of interesting. This is an article that's actually put up
Speaker 2: featured on WND. WND is a website that loves Trump
Speaker 2: and loves Israel, but they didn't write this article was
Speaker 2: written by a Daily Caller, but they featured it. What's
Speaker 2: going to be the political fallout for Trump and the
Speaker 2: Republicans on this it remains to be seen. Left wing
Speaker 2: commentator jug Legham posted a screenshot of a January thirty first,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty three op ed piece by J. D Vance
Speaker 2: in which he touted the fact that Trump had started
Speaker 2: no wars during his first term in office. A twenty
Speaker 2: twenty post to Twitter by now Director of National Intelligence
Speaker 2: Tulsey Gabbard featured a T shirt with no war with
Speaker 2: Iran on it. She was at the time a Democrat
Speaker 2: member of Congress running for the presidential nomination, but in
Speaker 2: support of Trump, she had this to say, as well.
Speaker 9: Join me as I say these words. We hold these
Speaker 9: truths to be self evident that all men are created equal.
Speaker 2: That's why we don't have unjustified primp.
Speaker 9: Certain unalienable rights that among these are life, liberty, and
Speaker 9: the pursuit of happiness. Now, this choice that we have
Speaker 9: before us is very personal to me. I'm a lieutenant
Speaker 9: colonel in the Army Reserve. I've served now for over
Speaker 9: twenty one years. I've deployed to different war zones three
Speaker 9: times over that period, and I've seen the cost of
Speaker 9: war for my brothers and sisters who paid the ultimate price.
Speaker 9: I carry their memories and their sacrifice in my heart
Speaker 9: every day. Here is the choice that we have.
Speaker 2: A vote for.
Speaker 9: Kamala Harris is a vote for Dick Cheney, and it's
Speaker 9: a vote for war more war, likely World War three,
Speaker 9: and nuclear war.
Speaker 2: But now they'refore it.
Speaker 9: Donald Trump is a vote for a man who wants
Speaker 9: to end wars, not start them. History will look back
Speaker 9: on us at this moment for the choice that we make.
Speaker 2: Did we More importantly, God will or peace? History is
Speaker 2: not an entity history as people in the future. We'll
Speaker 2: look back on you. God is looking at you right now.
Speaker 2: Tulsa not a Hindu god either. So yeah, that is
Speaker 2: the you know, a vote for Laala Harris is a
Speaker 2: vote for World War three and war with Iran. But
Speaker 2: not if you vote for Trump. He is the peace candidate.
Speaker 2: I'm reminded of the fact that you had FDR campaigned
Speaker 2: on keeping us out of war, didn't He did just
Speaker 2: the opposite. To anyone still gullible enough to fall for
Speaker 2: scummy media hoaxes. That's Steven Miller. Or how about the
Speaker 2: scummy hoaxes of the Trump regime. That's the reality of
Speaker 2: all this stuff. Well, yeah, he wants Trump doesn't want
Speaker 2: to have any more regime change wars. He said.
Speaker 4: Our current strategy of nation building and regime change is
Speaker 4: a proven absolute failure r discycle.
Speaker 10: We must abandon the failed policy of nation building and
Speaker 10: regime change that Hillary Clinton pushed in Iraq, in Libya,
Speaker 10: in Egypt, and in Syria.
Speaker 3: Regime change takes chaos.
Speaker 4: You've seen how that works over the last twenty years.
Speaker 4: That hasn't been too good, a reckless in prevention mobilism.
Speaker 3: We're getting out of the nation building.
Speaker 2: Business, except when we aren't. Again, you want to fall
Speaker 2: for scummy hoaxes like that from scummy people like Trump.
Speaker 2: Marjorie Taylor Green said this is not freeing the Iranian people.
Speaker 2: You know, that's the way Trump is trying to present this.
Speaker 2: Right now, she said, this is murdering their children. That's right.
Speaker 2: When we look at the decapitation strife that they did.
Speaker 2: I think it's very telling that the top three candidates
Speaker 2: that the Trump regime would like to see take the
Speaker 2: place of Kamane that they killed. The top three candidates
Speaker 2: were killed along with him. These people are clowns, folks.
Speaker 2: They're dangerous, lying, murdering clowns. They had some people they
Speaker 2: thought they were going to be adults in the room
Speaker 2: and they killed them as well. Because you got to
Speaker 2: get the Ayatola Kamanie and my generation has been let down,
Speaker 2: abused and used by our government, and our entire adult
Speaker 2: lives and our children's generation is literally being abandoned, said
Speaker 2: Marjorie Taylor Green. Thousands and thousands of Americans from my
Speaker 2: generation have been killed and injured and never ending pointless
Speaker 2: foreign wars, and we said no more. But now we're
Speaker 2: going to free the Iranian people. She said, please, please
Speaker 2: give me a break. Iran is on the verge of
Speaker 2: having nuclear weapons. Yeah, sure, she said, we have been
Speaker 2: spoon fed that line for decades. It was always a lie,
Speaker 2: and it is always America last and Israel first. That's
Speaker 2: really I had the end Israel first. But Thomas Massey
Speaker 2: also came out said I opposed to this war. This
Speaker 2: is not America first. The Constitution requires a vote, and
Speaker 2: your representative needs to be on record as opposing or
Speaker 2: supporting this war. He said of this attack is an
Speaker 2: act of war that is unauthorized by Congress. Ram Paul
Speaker 2: reminded Trump that the only Congress, that only Congress has
Speaker 2: the authority to declare war. He quoted President John Quincy
Speaker 2: adams famous words about not going abroad seeking monsters to
Speaker 2: destroy James Madison's words to Thomas Jefferson, saying, the executive
Speaker 2: branch is the branch that is most prone to war. Therefore,
Speaker 2: the Constitution, with studied care, delegated the war powers to
Speaker 2: the legislature. Once the war is declared, it'll be managed
Speaker 2: by the commander in chief. But the decision as to
Speaker 2: whether or not to go to war should never be
Speaker 2: the decision of the executive war Now we don't have
Speaker 2: the executive branch anymore. We have the emergency branch. Since
Speaker 2: Trump became president, whenever he wants to do something. He
Speaker 2: declares emergency, and it says, now I can do it
Speaker 2: through executive orders, and the constitution is suspended on issue
Speaker 2: after issue after issue after issue. Now on war as well, well.
Speaker 2: Freethought Project got it right. They said, the US Israeli
Speaker 2: war on Iran, it's not about nuclear weapons. It's about imperialism.
Speaker 2: Our history with Iran began in nineteen fifty three, and
Speaker 2: it has been about imperialism and regime changed the entire time.
Speaker 2: It did not start with the takeover of the US
Speaker 2: embassy in the Iranian Revolution. That was a response to
Speaker 2: what we had done. And so Freethought Project says, waging
Speaker 2: a war of aggression against Iran and their non existent
Speaker 2: nuclear weapons is an absurd fig leaf, just like the
Speaker 2: Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. That's right, and so we
Speaker 2: hear this all the time as well, that they can
Speaker 2: never have nuclear weapons.
Speaker 4: They can never have a nuclear weapon, not about that.
Speaker 4: That is why in Operation Midnight Hammer last June, we
Speaker 4: obliterated the regime's nuclear program flyar O, Ntense and Isfahan.
Speaker 2: If you obliterated it, then why do we have to
Speaker 2: worry about it and go back to war again. He's
Speaker 2: lying both times. Actually, so this is we don't understand
Speaker 2: what this is. The absurd narrative that Washington and Tel
Speaker 2: Aviv are promoting is that they had to carry out
Speaker 2: preemptive strikes. Premptive strikes are illegal undernational law. They are
Speaker 2: always immoral because they're not something that's done defensively. You're
Speaker 2: assuming that somebody is going to do something that's like saying, well,
Speaker 2: that person looked at me with malice, so I had
Speaker 2: to shoot him. This is nonsense, writes Free Thought Project.
Speaker 2: Iran signed the nuclear Deal the Joint Comprehensive Plan of
Speaker 2: Action in twenty fifteen, in which it agreed not to
Speaker 2: pursue nuclear weapons in return for US and European countries
Speaker 2: lifting their illegal, unilaterally applied sanctions. The International Atomic Energy
Speaker 2: Agency the IAEA, admitted that Iran was abiding by that
Speaker 2: nuclear deal. Nevertheless, Trump unilaterally tore it up in twenty
Speaker 2: eighteen in his first term. The flagrant violation of international
Speaker 2: law that he did then, Iran's current president is ironically
Speaker 2: a reformist who sought to negotiate another deal with the
Speaker 2: same US aggressors who sabotaged the previous one. Just a
Speaker 2: few years before. When Trump entered office for a second
Speaker 2: term in twenty twenty five, he oversaw several rounds of
Speaker 2: bad faith negotiations quote unquote negotiations with Iran. Then during
Speaker 2: one of those talks, the US and Israel suddenly bombed Iran.
Speaker 2: In June of twenty twenty five, The Wall Street Journal admitted,
Speaker 2: in a twist, US diplomacy served as cover for an
Speaker 2: Israeli surprise attack. Folks, we not only are going to
Speaker 2: war for Israel, We're going to war like Israel. Lies
Speaker 2: and sneak attacks, treachery. On February the twenty seventh, Aman's
Speaker 2: foreign minister, who moderated the talks, said they'd made substantial
Speaker 2: progress and a peace deal was within our reach. Just
Speaker 2: a few hours later, Trump and Netnahu launched the bombing
Speaker 2: campaign in Iran. This is the way these guys operate.
Speaker 2: The goal of this war of aggression is clear. Washington
Speaker 2: wants to topple independent government and that's what they've been
Speaker 2: doing since nineteen fifty three in Iran. The US Empire,
Speaker 2: more specifically the large corporations that it represents, want to
Speaker 2: control the plentiful resources not only in Iran, but also
Speaker 2: in the entire region and also in Venezuela, right, which
Speaker 2: is home to the world's top producers of oil and
Speaker 2: natural gas, as well as critical minerals and other important commodities.
Speaker 2: Washington also hopes to cut off China's access to its
Speaker 2: top energy providers. We don't really care what happens if
Speaker 2: we plunge the world into global depression and global war,
Speaker 2: but we got to get those Chinese, right. This is insanity. Well,
Speaker 2: the American government has become is this cartoon character who's
Speaker 2: got a shotgun and he's trying to kill a fly
Speaker 2: in his house by shooting the place up with a
Speaker 2: shotgun having blasted open a vacuum. There is no guarantee
Speaker 2: that the US and Israel will likely like what is
Speaker 2: going to come next. That's the headline from CNN, and
Speaker 2: as I point out, the top three replacements that the
Speaker 2: Trump regime wanted to take the place of the Iatola
Speaker 2: were killed alongside of him in that opening strike. They're clowns, idiots.
Speaker 2: Evil Comanie's rule was marked by mismanagement, ultimately ended with
Speaker 2: one of the most brutal episodes of his trademark repression
Speaker 2: violence that his regime meeted out in order to keep power.
Speaker 2: His removal has sparked celebrations in Tehran as well as
Speaker 2: forty days of official morning and huge pro regime crowds,
Speaker 2: but also a struggle for what remains the regime to
Speaker 2: work out what comes next. For forty seven years, the
Speaker 2: theocracy has turned into was turned into an autocracy and
Speaker 2: a kleptocracy. Well, I would say it was. For seventy
Speaker 2: three years what the Shaw was running was also an
Speaker 2: autocracy and also a kleptocracy. The bottom line is is
Speaker 2: that and there's a lesson to be learned in this.
Speaker 2: You know, it can jump out of the frying pan
Speaker 2: into the fire. And the situation was that people were
Speaker 2: sick of the Shaw's repression, kleptocracy and autocracy. How many
Speaker 2: people did he kill, Well, it wasn't reported because you know,
Speaker 2: the CIA Massade had set up the Slovaka and they
Speaker 2: were making sure that that information was repressed. I would
Speaker 2: argue that the Shaw was ever a bit as repressive
Speaker 2: as the Iatola, perhaps better at it because the training
Speaker 2: of the ciam Massad and so it was a reaction
Speaker 2: to that. And when they picked this other guy, he
Speaker 2: basically did the same thing to them. History lacks good
Speaker 2: examples of air campaigns that have easily toppled regimes and
Speaker 2: led to replacements that the attackers preferred. In other words,
Speaker 2: it hasn't happened. We keep doing the same thing over
Speaker 2: and over again and expecting different results. That is the
Speaker 2: insanity of our policy. That's there. We've got a couple
Speaker 2: of comments, DJA, thank you for the typic, said David.
Speaker 2: Do you realize the national debt was five point nine
Speaker 2: trillion in two thousand, almost thirty three trillion more people,
Speaker 2: thirty three trillion more and people fighting over four of
Speaker 2: the worst presidents in US history? And it's insane. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you're right. And of course when you look at it,
Speaker 2: not only was the US debt tiny compared to what
Speaker 2: it is right now, we're about to hit forty trillion
Speaker 2: from about six trillion in twenty five years or so.
Speaker 2: And part of it is when you look at the
Speaker 2: amount of money that was spent in the two thousand election.
Speaker 2: Al Gore accused George W. Bush of buying the election
Speaker 2: because he spent He and the Republican Party spent one
Speaker 2: hundred million dollars. We've got Senate races that spend more
Speaker 2: than that now, and we're probably getting there with some
Speaker 2: of the congressional races that people have had. And when
Speaker 2: you put that kind of money there, folks, that is
Speaker 2: a benchmark, a metric, if you will, of the kind
Speaker 2: of corruption that is in Washington. People aren't going to
Speaker 2: pour that kind of money in if they don't expect
Speaker 2: to get a return on their investment. And the return
Speaker 2: they get on the investment and the politician is astronomical.
Speaker 2: Usually they get one thousand dollars back for every dollar
Speaker 2: that they put in. It's kind of a rule of thumb.
Speaker 2: I've noticed over and over again. You know, they give
Speaker 2: a million dollars to this political candidate while they wind
Speaker 2: up with a billion dollar contract with them with the government.
Speaker 2: And so that's one of the reasons why it has exploded.
Speaker 2: It's the corruption that is there. Washington is bought and sold.
Speaker 2: It's not just bought and sold by the Israelis. It's
Speaker 2: everybody is being bought and sold there. But the Israelis
Speaker 2: just happened to have the most obviously evil agenda. They
Speaker 2: want to shut down our free speech, They want to
Speaker 2: get us involved in wars and things like that, whereas
Speaker 2: these other people are just looting us. Seven ways to
Speaker 2: Sunday trump Berger says, I'm fully expecting a major false
Speaker 2: flag event to get the sheep will fully on board
Speaker 2: of this. Yeah, maybe they will come up with it.
Speaker 2: I guess they're going to. This is kind of what
Speaker 2: Trump does. He dresses whatever he feels like, and he
Speaker 2: talks about how he can do whatever he feels like,
Speaker 2: and then if he has too much pushback, then he
Speaker 2: will address it. Then he'll go to court. Then we'll
Speaker 2: deal with the after effects of this afterwards. So maybe
Speaker 2: that's why they skipped what is usually the pre requisite
Speaker 2: a false flag event. The false flag may be still coming.
Speaker 2: They still see our false flag event in order to
Speaker 2: try to build support for something that he doesn't have
Speaker 2: support for and should not have support for. We're going
Speaker 2: to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Liberty, it's your move and now The David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 11: mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen
Speaker 11: wherever you go.
Speaker 2: Well, I want to thank everybody for the contributions that
Speaker 2: we received, with the checks that we got and with
Speaker 2: the contributions we got on zell and cash app and
Speaker 2: on a subscribe Star. I want to thank you very
Speaker 2: much because we got to seven eights. I mean, it's
Speaker 2: partly my fault because I don't like to talk about it.
Speaker 2: I don't like to push this and the money aspect it.
Speaker 2: We don't put it behind a paywall, and I don't
Speaker 2: like to harangue people about supporting the program, and so
Speaker 2: I didn't really talk about it until we got late
Speaker 2: into the month. But when I did start talking about it,
Speaker 2: people responded, And I want to thank you for getting
Speaker 2: us so high so quickly. And let me think specifically
Speaker 2: some of the people who helped to produce this show,
Speaker 2: by the way, on these are the contributors on Zel
Speaker 2: Alex C, Daniel C, Sally D, Lois I, Matthew M.
Speaker 2: This is Michael M. I'm sorry, Mitchell M, Lisa Kay,
Speaker 2: Susan el Bianca S. Kimberly, m Amy B, Joseph R,
Speaker 2: Carl H, Alexander W, Gregory C, Adam D, Michael P.
Speaker 2: William W, Susan L again, Gregory I, Terry M, Craig,
Speaker 2: M Scott, M. Scott W. Sorry, Janis W. Ryan F.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much. And who is big support of
Speaker 2: this program. He has supported us with the coins that
Speaker 2: we have and we have not put together a new
Speaker 2: commercial for those yet, but that'll be coming out real soon.
Speaker 2: Michael L. Kevin M, Ronald H. Maurice W. Craig M.
Speaker 2: And William W. Thank you so much for your support.
Speaker 2: Really do appreciate that all of us do here. And
Speaker 2: I want to talk a little bit about the horrific
Speaker 2: consequences that we have already seen as this war has
Speaker 2: just started. We're talking earlier about the women who were killed.
Speaker 2: The girls were killed in elementary school. Why would we
Speaker 2: be surprised when we look at what Jeffrey Epstein, Massad
Speaker 2: and the did to girls before. This is par for
Speaker 2: the course. Evidently, the Iranian state media says more than
Speaker 2: one hundred students have been killed, actually one hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty three girls killed in a strike on a school.
Speaker 2: At least one hundred and fifty three, almost all them
Speaker 2: young girls, have been killed in an air strike at
Speaker 2: a primary school, according to the city's governor. Happened on
Speaker 2: Saturday morning, right off the bat. The victims were between
Speaker 2: seven and twelve years old, just like the victims of
Speaker 2: Epstein the CIA massade. And when you look at this,
Speaker 2: there was an excellent interview that Judge Apolitano had with
Speaker 2: Scott Ritter, and Guard covered it in a special that
Speaker 2: he did about the war on Saturday. But Scott Ritter
Speaker 2: said that he is haunted by something that happened while
Speaker 2: he was in the Middle military. He's now a weapons
Speaker 2: inspector and he has spoken out against war. This may
Speaker 2: be part of the reason. Listen to what he had
Speaker 2: to say about innocent civilian lives that he had a
Speaker 2: part in taking accidentally.
Speaker 12: You know, this man is talking about striking targets to
Speaker 12: you know, to defend Americans and all that I've been
Speaker 12: the war, in the Gulf War, you know, I was
Speaker 12: involved in targeting. And one of the things that we
Speaker 12: did is we targeted a place called the Armaria bomb Shelter.
Speaker 12: We knew as a bomb shelter, but we had good
Speaker 12: intelligence that said it had been converted to be used
Speaker 12: as a national level command and control facilit to exempt.
Speaker 12: Just so the people understand what I'm talking about, we
Speaker 12: were hunting scud missiles unsuccessfully. Israel was ready to get
Speaker 12: involved in this war and we had to prevent Israel
Speaker 12: from doing that. In order to do that, we had
Speaker 12: to show that we were seriously hunting down scud missiles.
Speaker 12: We believed that the command and control for the scud
Speaker 12: missiles were being carried out by Saddam Hussein, and Saddam
Speaker 12: Hussein used a system called the Mark fourteen radio telephone.
Speaker 12: It was made by Siemens. It was an encrypted radio
Speaker 12: telephone system with a unique signature, unique frequency ranges, etc.
Speaker 12: And we had detected the Mark fourteen signal coming from
Speaker 12: antennas associated with this bomb shelter, and we had reason
Speaker 12: to believe that the Iraqis had located senior command and
Speaker 12: control in this place, and so you know, we reviewed it.
Speaker 12: We reviewed it, we reviewed it. There was no indication
Speaker 12: that it was being used as a bomb shelter. I
Speaker 12: helped pick the impact points, and my job was when
Speaker 12: the mission strike came back to look at the photographs
Speaker 12: to determine whether or not we did it. And I
Speaker 12: know that we had to put two GBU twenty eighths
Speaker 12: through the same hole to achieve the result, and we
Speaker 12: did it. We destroyed it and I signed it off
Speaker 12: as destroyed, and I was feeling pretty good. While later
Speaker 12: CNN came on and we found out that we had
Speaker 12: hit a bomb shelter and four hundred and eight women
Speaker 12: and children were dead, killed, the most horrible kind of death.
Speaker 12: When the first bomb went in, it created fire that
Speaker 12: trapped the neighbors. Could hear the women and children screaming
Speaker 12: trying to get out. The second bob come in ignited
Speaker 12: and it boiled. The firefighters are putting the water in
Speaker 12: and all of these bodies got turned into fat. That's
Speaker 12: what happened there. And there's not a single day you
Speaker 12: know that that doesn't haunt you. It haunts you for
Speaker 12: the rest of your life. We have hit two children's schools.
Speaker 12: We have bombed two children's schools. Sixty three dead children, girls,
Speaker 12: little girls dead, their mothers waiting for their daughters to
Speaker 12: come home. They sent their daughters to school on the
Speaker 12: belief that there wouldn't be a war because there was
Speaker 12: diplomacy going on that there wouldn't be a war because
Speaker 12: Marco Rubio said he was traveling to the region of Monday.
Speaker 12: So they sent their girls to a school, were in school,
Speaker 12: and we bombed it, and we bombed another one. There's
Speaker 12: one hundred girls buried under their rubble being dug out. Now,
Speaker 12: girls that will not survive. This is the horror of war.
Speaker 12: But what I'm trying to say, is at least when
Speaker 12: I was involved in the bombing of the I'm Maria Shelter.
Speaker 12: We did our damnedest to make sure that it was
Speaker 12: a military target. We were wrong, and it haunts you forever.
Speaker 2: And yet he went on to say, what is happening now?
Speaker 2: They've been given a window that they're going to conduct
Speaker 2: these bombing raids, and I just need a lot of targets.
Speaker 2: You know we're going to be doing these bombs, so
Speaker 2: find some targets. This is what Trump did with ice
Speaker 2: in Minneapolis and Minnesota. I want X number of arrests,
Speaker 2: Just go find somebody, right, And when you do that,
Speaker 2: you wind up with these types of consequences. So Scott
Speaker 2: Ridder was talking about you get people quotas, right, just
Speaker 2: like here in Tennessee, we had that state Highway patrol
Speaker 2: started arresting sober drivers. I'm laughing about it, but I
Speaker 2: could be one of them arresting sober drivers and charging
Speaker 2: them with DWI because they had a quota. So you
Speaker 2: put a quota on that, you put a quota on
Speaker 2: ICE actions, you put a quota on bombing targets, and
Speaker 2: what you get is a lot of bad results. With
Speaker 2: this kind of stuff. A staff member at this one school.
Speaker 2: And remember this is just one of the two schools.
Speaker 2: This is the one that everybody was saying was about
Speaker 2: one hundred students. It turns out to be one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty three. There's another school that's involved the Middle East.
Speaker 2: I says she remains in shock at the intensity of
Speaker 2: the attack. Through tears, she said she used to watch
Speaker 2: the young girls playing at school every day. After today's strikes, however,
Speaker 2: she saw their bodies lying on classroom benches and in
Speaker 2: different corners of the school. She said she had just
Speaker 2: stepped out of the school when she suddenly heard a
Speaker 2: horrifying sound, and within seconds a missile hit the school building.
Speaker 2: After hearing the blast, she ran back towards the school
Speaker 2: and was faced with a scene that she said she
Speaker 2: could never forget. I feel like I had gone mute.
Speaker 2: I couldn't speak. You could hear the sound of children
Speaker 2: crying and screaming. The airstrike on the school left many
Speaker 2: inside the building trapped. There are one hundred and seventy
Speaker 2: female students at the school at the time of the attack.
Speaker 2: Fifty three out of one hundred and seventy did a
Speaker 2: great job, didn't you guys? Good job USA. USA. Lethality
Speaker 2: is what Pete Hegseth is about. Not legality, not morality, lethality.
Speaker 2: One hundred and fifty three out one hundred and seventy students,
Speaker 2: We got them. Good job, Pete, that's exactly what you're about.
Speaker 2: Just amazing to me. Dozens of innocent children have been
Speaker 2: murdered this site alone, and this is just a start.
Speaker 2: As of Saturday, two hundred and one people have been
Speaker 2: killed in Iran and forty seven wounded, said the medical
Speaker 2: sources there. And then we've had three Americans do we
Speaker 2: Does Donnie care about them? I don't think so. Three
Speaker 2: American service members killed in action during Operation Epic Fury,
Speaker 2: as Guard Goldsmith called it Epic Folly. That's right. Likely
Speaker 2: many more, and they won't be telling you as all
Speaker 2: of them are killed. The situation is fluid, said the Pentagon.
Speaker 2: US Central Command reported on Sunday morning that three US
Speaker 2: service members in Kuwait have been killed in action during
Speaker 2: Operation Epic Fury. Was reported further that additional service members
Speaker 2: have been Five of them have been wounded seriously, Several
Speaker 2: others sustained minor scrapnel injuries and concussions and it goes
Speaker 2: on and on. Meanwhile, you have these articles about Baron
Speaker 2: Trump making eyebrows with his fashion choices as he attended
Speaker 2: the State of the Union. Can you imagine he goes
Speaker 2: to the State of the Union in a blue tie instead
Speaker 2: of a red tie. And this is what they are
Speaker 2: talking about on the mirror and the fact that he
Speaker 2: doesn't know how to tie a tie properly. According to them,
Speaker 2: this is the concern of the elite. Baron wore a
Speaker 2: blue tie instead of read doesn't he want to be
Speaker 2: the red Baron? Cursew Red Baron? This is Roman Emperor
Speaker 2: style decadence, folks, that truly is.
Speaker 4: My administration has taken every possible step to minimize the
Speaker 4: risks to US personnel in the region. Even so, and
Speaker 4: I do not make this statement lightly, the Iranian regime
Speaker 4: seeks to kill the lives of courageous American heroes.
Speaker 10: May be lost.
Speaker 5: Some both them out made the way the plan who
Speaker 5: red wine with a bad.
Speaker 2: Way to the chief. I want to Canada, you know,
Speaker 2: name me.
Speaker 8: A set so.
Speaker 9: You don't want them.
Speaker 2: Some off them out seeon and a half yeah, sober spooney.
Speaker 2: No more things change, the more they don't change, right.
Speaker 13: I just want to interject real quickly. That video of
Speaker 13: the Napolaitano video you played reminded me of this interview
Speaker 13: with a World War Two veteran discussing the bombing of Dresden.
Speaker 13: Oh yeah, and all these years later he's describing it
Speaker 13: and he's breaking down talking about how you know you'd
Speaker 13: see some skeletons left over from the adults. Wow, but
Speaker 13: there was nothing left of the children. It just vaporized them,
Speaker 13: melted them all down.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the bombing of Dresden, that fire bombing of Dresden
Speaker 2: was actually as bad as some people said. It was
Speaker 2: worse than the nuclear bombs that were dropped on Roshima
Speaker 2: and Nagasaki. So this is a murderation of you know,
Speaker 2: That's why I said, you know, the do any of
Speaker 2: us remember a situation when we had a just war
Speaker 2: where civilians were not targeted. Well, you'd have to be
Speaker 2: somebody who was around and cognizant of what was going
Speaker 2: on before World War Two in order to remember that
Speaker 2: kind of a world. But we have become the monsters
Speaker 2: that we fought. We have become the Nazis. The Nazis
Speaker 2: decided they were going to do civilian bombing campaigns, and
Speaker 2: it was outrageous. Then we started doing it, and now
Speaker 2: our government, our pentagon is doing what the Nazi U
Speaker 2: boat commanders were infamous for, and that is hitting ships
Speaker 2: and then targeting the shipwrecked survivors to kill them in
Speaker 2: the water. That's what we do now, that's what we
Speaker 2: have become. Marjorie Taylor Green tears into the Trump administration,
Speaker 2: calling them sick effing liars. As you got that right.
Speaker 13: It's also worth stating that even in a just war,
Speaker 13: you're going to have unintended consequences and casualties, but if
Speaker 13: you go in with a just war mentality, you can
Speaker 13: do what you can to minimize them.
Speaker 2: That's right, and that's why we have That's why we
Speaker 2: are very careful about starting war, and it should only
Speaker 2: be done in defense after somebody else has preemptively attacked.
Speaker 2: The preemptive attacker is the bad guy. That's us over
Speaker 2: and over again. Sorry, sorry, trivias, I didn't mean to.
Speaker 13: Oh you're fine. No, Just if you go in without
Speaker 13: any concern for these things, you will maximize civilian casualty. Right, Yeah,
Speaker 13: two schools, But you know we're just going to fire
Speaker 13: these missiles away because we've got a surplus, and we're
Speaker 13: pretty sure our intel is good, right, We're pretty sure.
Speaker 13: What's the worst that could happen? One hundred and seventy
Speaker 13: dead children apparently, is what's the worst that could happen.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: No, it's going to get much worse than that. I
Speaker 2: think as a matter of fact, you know was mentioned
Speaker 2: about Charlie Kirk earlier, and Charlie Kirk put up a
Speaker 2: post he said, this is going unnoticed because so much
Speaker 2: other news is happening. This is back in April, April third,
Speaker 2: he was killed and what was it September? Is that
Speaker 2: when he was killed? He said. But the war drums
Speaker 2: are beating again in DC. The warmongers, the worst sellers right,
Speaker 2: worry that this is their last chance to get the
Speaker 2: white whale they've been chasing for thirty years. An all
Speaker 2: out regime change war against Iran, a new Middle East
Speaker 2: war would be catastrophic mistake. Our military stockpiles are depleted
Speaker 2: after three years of backing Ukraine. Our effort to reshore
Speaker 2: manufacturing is only just begun. It will take years to
Speaker 2: bear fruit. War would worsen our already immense deficit and
Speaker 2: national debt. Iran is larger than Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan combined.
Speaker 2: A war would not be easy and could easily become
Speaker 2: a calamity. Thanks to Trump's restraint during his first term,
Speaker 2: America has a golden opportunity to pull away from Middle
Speaker 2: East quagmires for good. He wrote, Well, I didn't see that.
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk may have thought that. He saw that. I
Speaker 2: didn't see restraint, stated people. We shouldn't throw that opportunity
Speaker 2: away so that some DC has beens can feel tough
Speaker 2: by sending young Americans to die yet again. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, I don't know if I got that
Speaker 2: clip to you or not, but a clip where he
Speaker 2: was talking, and it was kind of interesting when Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk was talking. He was comparing and contrasting two different
Speaker 2: streams of thought within their publican party. And he said, well,
Speaker 2: the one is the neo cons and then he talked
Speaker 2: about some of the same things he said there, and
Speaker 2: he said, they've thoroughly discredited themselves, mentioning Lindsey Graham particularly,
Speaker 2: and then he said, and then the other strand is
Speaker 2: the isolationists like Ron Paul and so forth. And I
Speaker 2: liked that, and I thought, you know, it's really not
Speaker 2: He says, I understand that's kind of a majorative term
Speaker 2: to call people isolationists, and it is. Ron Paul is
Speaker 2: not isolationist. Ron Paul is a nonventionist in the mold
Speaker 2: of the first several generations of American leaders and founders
Speaker 2: who understood that we don't want to have foreign entanglements,
Speaker 2: who understood that Europe is in a constant state of war,
Speaker 2: who understood that if we go abroad to fight monsters,
Speaker 2: we become monsters ourselves. And so he said, well, we
Speaker 2: really had to go back and take a look at
Speaker 2: this isolationism, because he said, neo con is something that's
Speaker 2: completely discribed itself. And think about that, right, Neo cons
Speaker 2: are not conservatives. They are neo or new conservatives, a
Speaker 2: new kind of conservatism conservatism. It wasn't just Ron Paul.
Speaker 2: It was a a lot of people in the publican
Speaker 2: party going back opposing our involvement in World War One
Speaker 2: and World War II. And so they were the non interventionists.
Speaker 2: And it is the people who have now become the
Speaker 2: leaders of the GOP that are the new version of
Speaker 2: conservatives who want to reject the American values. But what
Speaker 2: I thought was interesting was nowhere in his discussion of
Speaker 2: all this stuff did morality play a point. Now, what
Speaker 2: is the morality of what we're doing here? You would
Speaker 2: think that Charlie would reflect on that, and I think
Speaker 2: we better reflect on that because this country is circling
Speaker 2: the drain and this is you know, Pete heek Seth
Speaker 2: wants to make sure they don't have any drag queen
Speaker 2: storytime hours and stuff in Pentagon schools. I'm all for that,
Speaker 2: but this is just as troubling and just as corrupting
Speaker 2: when you look at this. You want to be pro
Speaker 2: life save babies from being ripped apart by a surgeon's scalpel, Well,
Speaker 2: how about being pro life and save them from being
Speaker 2: ripped apart by firebombs as well. So Marjorie Taylor Green
Speaker 2: also mocked a post from the GOP that propped up
Speaker 2: Trump and Vice President JD. Vance as the quote pro
Speaker 2: piece Ticket said over and over again, they just missed
Speaker 2: keeping spelling peace. It's piecee right. They want a piece
Speaker 2: of that country, and a piece of that country, and
Speaker 2: a piece of this other one. They want the oil
Speaker 2: fields in Syria. They want the oil fields in Venezuela.
Speaker 2: They want the oil fields in Iran. The Trump administration,
Speaker 2: she said, actually asked in a poll how many casualties
Speaker 2: voters were willing to accept in a war with Iran.
Speaker 2: Think about how cynical that is, and consider the fact
Speaker 2: that they will move heaven and earth to keep you
Speaker 2: from finding out what the real casualties are. So she said,
Speaker 2: how about zero, you bunch of sick effing liars. We
Speaker 2: voted for America first, and we voted for zero wars. Well,
Speaker 2: John Bolton laughs about that. He was asked on seeing
Speaker 2: about the Trump supporters who voted for no new wars.
Speaker 2: He knew better, right. His only regrett, he said, was
Speaker 2: that he wasn't able to go Trump into war with
Speaker 2: Iran when he was there. So on Saturday, he was
Speaker 2: asked on CNN John Bolton was if he had a
Speaker 2: message from Mago voters who backed Trump's foreign policy message
Speaker 2: and past campaigns of avoiding wars and regime change in
Speaker 2: the Middle East. He chuckled and told voters that they
Speaker 2: made the mistake of thinking that Trump has any sort
Speaker 2: of foundational philosophy at all. Yeah, he doesn't. He doesn't
Speaker 2: have any moral compass and he'll never tell you the truth.
Speaker 2: By the way, did he really deceive you? I mean,
Speaker 2: he had already assassinated like the number two guy, the
Speaker 2: top military leader, in his first term. Why would you
Speaker 2: be surprised after what he did in his first term abroad,
Speaker 2: as well as what he did here domestically with the
Speaker 2: so called pandemic. Why would any of this stuff that
Speaker 2: he's doing surprise you. It's all an extension, a continuation
Speaker 2: and enlargement of what he did the first term. Why
Speaker 2: would you ever support somebody like this? At least people
Speaker 2: say I voted for this is like you sure did.
Speaker 2: Unfortunately anyway, Bolton went on to say, well, I think
Speaker 2: they made the mistake of believing that Trump had a
Speaker 2: consistent philosophy, a national security strategy, and a policy, which
Speaker 2: he doesn't have any of that. And that's why I
Speaker 2: say he's not playing three D chess. He doesn't have
Speaker 2: any geopolitical strategy. His strategy is ego. Political politics are
Speaker 2: about his ego. He has to make people fear him,
Speaker 2: and to do that he threatens, he terrorizes, and he
Speaker 2: creates conflict everywhere. He is a terrorist. Well, the regime
Speaker 2: was scalped, they said, first thirty seconds, and they took
Speaker 2: out the top guys, including the people that the Trump
Speaker 2: administration wanted to replace the IOTOL they took them out
Speaker 2: as well. And of course how is this done while
Speaker 2: the CIA tracked him? And you know this also included
Speaker 2: Pallanteer and it would also include anthropic which is the
Speaker 2: other thing that I want to talk about before we
Speaker 2: run out of time today. I want to talk about
Speaker 2: what is going on with the large language models and
Speaker 2: how the Pentagon and the Trump administration wants to tie
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence and all this stuff. Folks, this is your
Speaker 2: dystopian nightmare that they're putting together here. They want to
Speaker 2: go to war with the American people. They want to
Speaker 2: create mass surveillance, a credit system as the Chinese have
Speaker 2: a system of censorship. Look at how much Trump hates
Speaker 2: free speech. And of course that was another one of
Speaker 2: the lies that Telsey Gabbard said when she was campaigning
Speaker 2: for him. Now, Trump was all in favor of free speech.
Speaker 2: Have you noticed how he sues and tries to put
Speaker 2: out a business major networks if there's a story that
Speaker 2: he doesn't like. How he sues Wall Street Journal for
Speaker 2: ten billion dollars in the BBC for ten billion dollars
Speaker 2: because he said they defamed him, or they you know,
Speaker 2: they didn't edit this properly, or they showed the Jeffrey
Speaker 2: Epstein birthday card that he said was a hoax and
Speaker 2: it wasn't.
Speaker 9: Vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for censorship and
Speaker 9: a complete erosion of our fundamental and constitutional rights and freedoms.
Speaker 9: A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for someone
Speaker 9: who will defend freedom and every one of our god
Speaker 9: given rights that are enshrined in the Constitution and Bill
Speaker 9: of Rights.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, we're going to take a quick break when
Speaker 2: we can come back, and we're going to talk about
Speaker 2: the large language models, and beyond that, the involvement Chinese
Speaker 2: style of the Trump regime and all these different corporations.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a management position and Intel, we're
Speaker 2: not just going to give them some money, but we're
Speaker 2: also going to have a say in what they do.
Speaker 2: And we've seen this over and over again. They've done
Speaker 2: it with Nvidia, and now they're going to try to
Speaker 2: put Anthropic out of business because they refuse to erase
Speaker 2: these red lines saying there's certain things that we will
Speaker 2: not allow. Our large language model to be used for
Speaker 2: things like mass surveillance at home and autonomous killing weapons.
Speaker 2: The Trump administration doesn't like that which speaks volumes about
Speaker 2: the Trump administration. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: Elvis the Beetle, and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
Speaker 11: them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, looking at the price of gold this morning. As
Speaker 2: the show was starting, it was up to fifty three
Speaker 2: sixty two. Of course, a few days ago they were saying, well,
Speaker 2: we think I might get up to fifty two or something.
Speaker 2: It's blown through that. It's now fallen back down to
Speaker 2: fifty three oh seven. But still, if you want to
Speaker 2: have something to help you weather the coming storm, I
Speaker 2: would suggest that you start trying to get some of
Speaker 2: your money into gold at least, and you can do
Speaker 2: that going to David Knight Eye Gold. I'll take you
Speaker 2: to Tony Harteban TONI must be having you had a
Speaker 2: help the guy, whether it's this without a nervous breakdown.
Speaker 2: I mean, we look at the environment that he's got
Speaker 2: to operate in, the massive price wings that are going up,
Speaker 2: and you know, even if it's mostly going up. It's
Speaker 2: still a very difficult thing for him, so anyway, but
Speaker 2: he's able to handle it. And a large reason that
Speaker 2: he's able to handle it is because of the people
Speaker 2: who are gradually accumulating, wisely accumulating gold and silver at
Speaker 2: wise wolf doing it through the wolf pack and if
Speaker 2: we can buy a little bit on a monthly basis
Speaker 2: each month, and so that has helped him as well
Speaker 2: as many people to accumulate and get some money out
Speaker 2: of the FIAT dollars that are being eviscerted by the
Speaker 2: warfare welfare state that we have. Well, the CIA helped
Speaker 2: to pinpoint a gathering of Iranian leaders, then Israel struck,
Speaker 2: and of course the CIA is using Pallenteer, which is
Speaker 2: using anthropic and so forth. The CIA had been tracking
Speaker 2: Commande for months, gaining more confidence about his locations and
Speaker 2: his patterns. That's called geospatial intelligence, folks, and so to
Speaker 2: point out that's what they've been working on. The fastest
Speaker 2: scoring part of the intelligence agencies going back to the
Speaker 2: late nineteen nineties, that's where James Clapper made his mark
Speaker 2: and rose through the intelligen legence agencies, was with Jee's
Speaker 2: facial intelligence and this is what they do in terms
Speaker 2: of tracking our politics and our opinions. As well. The
Speaker 2: agency learned that a meeting of top Irani officials to
Speaker 2: take place on Saturday morning at a leadership conpound in
Speaker 2: the heart of Tehran. The CIA learned that the Supreme
Speaker 2: Leader would be at the site as well. Well. The
Speaker 2: US military used Anthropic and Iran Strike despite a ban
Speaker 2: order by Trump, says The Wall Street Journal, think about
Speaker 2: this and all the lead up up to this, warpete
Speaker 2: went on the war path with Anthropic because they said,
Speaker 2: you know, we've got some standards and we don't want
Speaker 2: our system to be used for this. And they because,
Speaker 2: you'll use it for whatever we want to do. Right,
Speaker 2: if I've got something that's illegal and moral, unethical, you'll
Speaker 2: still work with us, right They said, no, we won't.
Speaker 2: And so it's like, Okay, you've got to get out
Speaker 2: of here, and we're going to punish these people, said
Speaker 2: people in the Pentagon. So it's going to be a
Speaker 2: real problem to extract them out of all these different things,
Speaker 2: and we're going to make them pay a price. We're
Speaker 2: going to try to put them out of business. We're
Speaker 2: going to declare that they are a security risk, and
Speaker 2: anybody who does any business with the American government can't
Speaker 2: use them in any way possible. Well, they are doing this,
Speaker 2: and again it's like I said, it's not geopolitics. It's
Speaker 2: not some grand scheme of what they want to do. Instead,
Speaker 2: even as they are setting up their sneak attack, right,
Speaker 2: and they know they're going to do this, they anathematize
Speaker 2: Anthropic and try to shut them down on the eve
Speaker 2: of going to war. This is like changing horses in
Speaker 2: the middle of a stream, Right, What does the matter
Speaker 2: with these people? They're the gang that can't shoot straight.
Speaker 2: Quite frankly, they're idiots. It's a ship of fools. The
Speaker 2: US military reportedly used Anthropic during a major airstrike and Iran,
Speaker 2: only hours after Trump ordered federal agencies to halt use
Speaker 2: of the computer systems. Sentcom used and Thropics claude AI
Speaker 2: model for operational support. According to people familiar with the
Speaker 2: matter cited by The Wall Street Journal, it has reportedly
Speaker 2: assisted with intelligence analysis, identifying potential targets like Comanie, and
Speaker 2: running battlefield simulations. The incident shows how deeply advanced AI
Speaker 2: systems have become embedded in defense operations, even as the
Speaker 2: administration moved to sever ties with the company, Claude remained
Speaker 2: integrated into military workflows. So even as they have this
Speaker 2: completely embedded there and they want to go to war,
Speaker 2: it's Trump's ego that is really the thing that we
Speaker 2: have to be concerned about. Right on Friday, the Trump
Speaker 2: administration instructed agencies to stop working with the company, directed
Speaker 2: the Department of Defense to treat it as a potential
Speaker 2: security risk, and Thropic refusing to grant unrestricted military use
Speaker 2: of its AI for any lawful scenario. They say, and
Speaker 2: yet we look at this and it's like lawful, what
Speaker 2: does that really mean to the ar Peat administration in
Speaker 2: the Pentagon or to the Trump regime. Right, it doesn't
Speaker 2: have any meaning left whatsoever. And so Anthropic has previously
Speaker 2: secured a multi year Pentagon contract worth up to two
Speaker 2: hundred million dollars, along with several major AI labs partnerships
Speaker 2: involving Palanteer and Amazon. Claude became approved for classified intelligence
Speaker 2: and operational workflows. The system was reportedly also involved in
Speaker 2: earlier operations, including a January mission to Venezuela the resulted
Speaker 2: in the kidnapping of Maduro. Hestath demanded that the company
Speaker 2: permit unrestricted military use of its models. The Anthropics CEO
Speaker 2: rejected the request, describing certain applications as ethical boundaries that
Speaker 2: the company would not cross. Nothing bothers or Pete more
Speaker 2: than when somebody says, don't follow illegal orders, or when
Speaker 2: somebody says, don't use my product for mass surveillance of Americans,
Speaker 2: don't use my product to power autonomous killing machines. That's
Speaker 2: kind of stuff that bothers them. Does it bother you
Speaker 2: what this guy's mentality is? I tell you, I've seen
Speaker 2: a lot of secretaries come and go with the Department
Speaker 2: of Defense. Pete Hegseth is absolutely the most criminal of
Speaker 2: any of them. He's worse than Lyon Leon Panetta. He
Speaker 2: really is. He's of the same cloth. Quite frankly, there's
Speaker 2: no ethical boundaries that he isn't demanding the people cross.
Speaker 2: And so he goes to the most unethical of the
Speaker 2: Silicon Valley technocrats, Sam Altman, and they set up a
Speaker 2: deal with Open AI, and so in an interview on Saturday,
Speaker 2: the Anthropic CEO said he opposes the use of its
Speaker 2: AI models for mass domestic surveillance and for fully autonomous weapons.
Speaker 2: So therefore the Pentagon, not just ICE, but the Pentagon
Speaker 2: is part of the domestic police state.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Remember when Obama was suspected of this and now while
Speaker 2: Trump is doing it. Right, we said, Alex Jones did
Speaker 2: four documentaries about police state USA and the Obama deception
Speaker 2: all the rest of stuff. But now that Trump is
Speaker 2: actually putting this into place, wants to use the Pentagon
Speaker 2: and use artificial and this is what they're so focused
Speaker 2: on AI about. Remember I said this from the very beginning.
Speaker 2: I said, the most dangerous part of AI is mass
Speaker 2: surveillance and the intelligence that they can glean by looking
Speaker 2: at you. The way they can analyze this and figure
Speaker 2: out what you were doing. But there's another aspect of this,
Speaker 2: and that is the fact that Anthropic has been banned
Speaker 2: from federal government contracts. This is reason looking at the
Speaker 2: business side of this, the unprecedented nature of the US government,
Speaker 2: and a fit of ego of the Trump administration again
Speaker 2: ego politics, deciding that in the same way, if he
Speaker 2: doesn't like what Canadian mayor does, he wants to put
Speaker 2: massive tariffs on Canada. You know this is this kind
Speaker 2: of reaction. You don't bow the knee to me, I
Speaker 2: will destroy you. Kiss my ring, kiss my foot, get
Speaker 2: down on the ground. This guy is a tyrant, a dictator,
Speaker 2: unlike any that we've ever seen in the office. We've
Speaker 2: had other people like him, but they try to hide it.
Speaker 2: Trump doesn't. He revels in it. So he's banned all
Speaker 2: federal agencies from working with him. And again, the two
Speaker 2: hundred million dollar contract is chicken feed. As I point out,
Speaker 2: it's only about one and a half percent of their
Speaker 2: growth revenue. But once he puts this out and bans
Speaker 2: everybody else if they have any interaction with the federal government.
Speaker 2: In other words, you're going to choose to work with
Speaker 2: the federal government or you're going to work with Anthropic.
Speaker 2: You can't do both. According to Trump, that's going to
Speaker 2: hurt them significantly. You know, the direct contract that they
Speaker 2: have is only one and a half percent of their revenue,
Speaker 2: but the rest of this stuff is going to really
Speaker 2: have a knock on effect. Heg Seth demanded that Anthropic
Speaker 2: equip the Pentagon and AI models free from usage policy
Speaker 2: constraints that may limit lawful military applications. Well, if you know,
Speaker 2: we look at how they're willing to disrupt all this stuff.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's going to be really difficult, as they said,
Speaker 2: to extract all this stuff. So they want to punish
Speaker 2: Anthropic because of that. But think about it, why would
Speaker 2: they go through the process of extracting all this stuff
Speaker 2: if heg Seth didn't want to use it for mass
Speaker 2: domestic surveillance and for autonomous killing weapons. At the same time,
Speaker 2: he says, well, I'm not going to use it for
Speaker 2: anything unlawful. He is willing to go through all of
Speaker 2: this hassle, all of this problem in order to have
Speaker 2: the ability to do these kind of unlawful, unethical things.
Speaker 2: You do see how the guy is lying out of
Speaker 2: both sides of his mouth. Right, So, the CEO of
Speaker 2: Anthropic published a public letter Thursday night explaining his constitutional, ethical,
Speaker 2: and technical concerns about unleashing AI that's capable of surveiling
Speaker 2: American citizens at home and executing people abroad according to
Speaker 2: its own judgment instead of a human beings. So again,
Speaker 2: what does this tell you about Pentagon and about Pete.
Speaker 2: The Pentagon is guilty of a glaring contradiction, says reason.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, No, this is a guy who is at
Speaker 2: the r Street Institute, Mark Dalton. He says they are
Speaker 2: guilty of a glaring contradiction. On the first side, they
Speaker 2: consider anthropics technology so vital to national defense that they
Speaker 2: thought that invoking the Defense Production Act was justified to
Speaker 2: retain access earlier this week, then suddenly designating the company
Speaker 2: as a supply chain risk. The ego politics of putting
Speaker 2: them as a supply chain risk is what would keep
Speaker 2: other companies from being able to do business with them.
Speaker 2: The President is permitting a six month window during which
Speaker 2: the federal agencies, including the Pentagon, will continue to use Claude.
Speaker 2: That's how integrated it is already. That's how vital it
Speaker 2: is already. And so when you think about all of
Speaker 2: that trouble, why would they go to all that trouble
Speaker 2: if they didn't really want to use it for mass surveillance.
Speaker 2: Pete Hegseth is lying to you about this. Dean Ball,
Speaker 2: the Senior Fellow of the Foundation for American and Innovation,
Speaker 2: said this designation as a supply chain risk is the
Speaker 2: most damaging policy move I've ever seen the US government
Speaker 2: try to make, because again, this is mafia. Don respect
Speaker 2: me or die right. The company's usage policy is explicitly
Speaker 2: prohibited the use of its AI models for domestic surveillance purposes,
Speaker 2: and to produce, modified design, market, or distribute weapons, explosives,
Speaker 2: dangerous materials, or other systems designed to create harm to
Speaker 2: or loss of life. Since June of twenty twenty four,
Speaker 2: when it began supporting American warfighters. These provisions are maintained
Speaker 2: in anthropics current usage policy. The company then received a
Speaker 2: two hundred million dollars Pentagon contract over a year later
Speaker 2: in July of twenty twenty five. So it was Pete
Speaker 2: Hegseth who gave them the two hundred million dollar contract.
Speaker 2: He knew what their policy was. Neither the President nor
Speaker 2: the Secretary of Defense were ignorant of these usage conditions,
Speaker 2: but now they have started paying attention because a they're
Speaker 2: not only evil, but they're incompetent. Neither Trump nor Hegseth
Speaker 2: have claimed that America that the CEO of Anthropic changed
Speaker 2: Anthropics terms of service. Opened II CEO Sam Altman claimed
Speaker 2: that the Department Offense agrees with open AI's most important
Speaker 2: safety principles, prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility
Speaker 2: for the use of force. If that's the case, then
Speaker 2: why the fight right again? This is the same type
Speaker 2: of stuff. We're hearing about Iran's nuker program. Well, we
Speaker 2: obliterated it. It's all gone, there's not anything left. Well,
Speaker 2: now we have to bomb them again to get it right,
Speaker 2: to stop their programs. The Trump administration doesn't even think
Speaker 2: twice when they lie to the American public. I mean,
Speaker 2: we have video footage from a gazillion different angles of
Speaker 2: Ice agents murdering Alex Pretty and the woman good, Renee Good,
Speaker 2: and yet they come out with absurd lines with the
Speaker 2: Renee Good thing. Had Christineome come out and said, yeah,
Speaker 2: they were stuck in the snow and then they got
Speaker 2: attacked by this woman and all the rest of stuff,
Speaker 2: And it's like, no, everybody's seen the video. We know
Speaker 2: you're lying. Trump did that as well, and so they're
Speaker 2: doing that again with this. We all know why they
Speaker 2: are having this fight with Anthropic. So the Anthropic blowout
Speaker 2: with the military involved the theoretical use of Claude for
Speaker 2: an incoming nuclear strike. That's what they're saying. They said
Speaker 2: that hypothetical nuclear strike scenario. According to the Washington Post,
Speaker 2: a Defense official told the Washington Post the Pentagon's technology
Speaker 2: chief pose an extremely hypothetic would Anthropic let the military
Speaker 2: use claud to help shoot down a nuclear armed intercontinental
Speaker 2: ballistic missile. The CEO supposedly apparently irritated the Pentagon leaders
Speaker 2: and said, well, you could call us and we'd work
Speaker 2: it out. And so that's what the Washington Post is saying. However,
Speaker 2: the CEO said that is patently false. I'm inclined to
Speaker 2: believe him since I don't know him, but I know
Speaker 2: that everybody in the Trump administration is an absurd liar,
Speaker 2: and we've seen it happen over and over again. So
Speaker 2: the company had agreed allowed Claude to be used for
Speaker 2: missile defense. The Trump administration figures, both inside and outside
Speaker 2: the DoD have piled pressure on Anthropic that has an
Speaker 2: avowed focus on safety. The CEO has criticized administration's attempt
Speaker 2: to curb AI regulation, which included listen to this. See
Speaker 2: he's been a critic, so he has. The CEO of
Speaker 2: Nentropic has been a critic of what the Trump administration
Speaker 2: has done, saying, you're not going to have any restrictions
Speaker 2: on AI state or local for ten years, right, And
Speaker 2: I said, the reason they're doing that is because they've
Speaker 2: got some real nefarious uses for AI involved, and of
Speaker 2: course the CEO of Anthropic has said that, and he's
Speaker 2: been critical of the Trump administration. I think that is
Speaker 2: what this is really about, he says, and cleared a
Speaker 2: proposed ban on state level regulation. So this is I
Speaker 2: think the essence of what is happening, and it is
Speaker 2: something that really should concern us, and it's something we
Speaker 2: don't have time to talk about more today, but we
Speaker 2: will revisit this. I'm afraid that the Pentagon and Warpete
Speaker 2: and Trump will revisit this as well. Have a good day.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 1: The common man.
Speaker 2: They created common Core. They've dumbed down our children. They
Speaker 2: created common past, track and control us. They're Commons project
Speaker 2: to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 2: image of God.
Speaker 1: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 2: to hide. Please share the information links you'll find at
Speaker 2: the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, thank you
Speaker 2: for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep
Speaker 2: us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com