Speaker 1: What's going on. Thank you so much for listening to
this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon
to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you
want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream,
my daily show prep with all the links, become a patron,
go to vpetecleanershow dot com. Make sure you hit the
subscribe button. Get every episode for free, write to your
smartphone or tablet, and again, thank you so much for
your support. Sometimes you have to engage in a bit
of undemocracy in order to save democracy. You know, you
have to. You got to burn the village down to
save the village. Sometimes. This is the excuse offered up
in the latest round on the Talkinghead Circuit by Alex
Thompson and Jake Tapper, still out talking about their book
Original Sin. I've covered it extensively because and I know,
I got another email from somebody last week, like Joe
Biden is in president, he's give it his health conditions,
just shut up about him whatever. Yeah. No, it's the
biggest political scandal in American history as far as I'm concerned. Yeah,
it's huge, and we still don't even know all of
the details. I welcome the book. Not going to buy it,
not going to read it, but I welcome the book.
I'm glad they're making their money now that you know
there's no price to actually pay for telling the truth,
only because I want more information, right, I want the
historical record to reflect all of the information, or as
much of it as possible. And so to the extent
that this can create a permission structure for more people
to explain their behavior and say what they knew when
they knew it, and all of that, I welcome, excuse me,
welcome the book. So Alex Thompson goes on to was
Oh Fox News Sunday, and he's talking with Shannon Breen,
and he says that top aids to Biden rationalized doing
undemocratic things, and not like undemocratic like Democratic Party, because
like that's why I never call them the Democratic Party,
because they don't operate democratically. It's the Democrat Party. So
they rationalize doing undemocratic things to hide the president's cognitive
decline because failing to do so would have been too
beneficial to Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: You mentioned in the book you talked to a number
of cabinet secretaries. I thought this was extremely illuminating and
a little bit frightening, because some of them told you
they didn't think he could handle that two am, middle
of the night phone call. I mean, he's the commander
in chief of the nuclear codes. One of them talked
about seeing him in person the last year and was
shocked by he seemed disoriented, His mouth was hanging open,
he seemed out of it. Did those cabinet officials express
any remorse, I mean, did they not have an obligation
to say the American people, we don't think this guy
can be the president, much less run for four more years.
Speaker 3: There was definitely a lot of self reflection about what,
if anything, they should have done differently. I think there
was a feeling, like a lot of members the Democratic
Party that were seeing this or some moments of him
seeming out of it, that going public was not going
to change his mind and was only going to help
Donald Trump. And I think that's how a lot of
them rationalize that. Now whether or not history will judge them,
you know, as being right for doing that, you know,
we will see. But this is also part of the
reason why the White House was shielding him from as
many people as possible, including cabinet secretaries, because sometimes, you know,
you see him once, maybe it's just the bad day.
You can just say, like, you know, maybe I just
had one bad meeting. You're not really sure.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, okay, so I'm going to make a prediction.
And you know me, I don't really make predictions, but
I'm going to predict this one. History will not judge
these people to have made the right decision, okay. In fact,
people are already judging them as not having made the
right decision. This idea that oh my gosh, we realized
in twenty twenty three that he was, you know, mouth open, eyes, blank,
doddering around out of it. But he had already said
he's running again. So what could we do? Yeah, you
could have actually pressured him not to run, and you
could have started exposing this. You could have gone out like,
what was the guy's name. Oh, I'm drawing a blank
on it now, the one that ran against him in
the primary, Dean Phillips is that his name? And he
you know, he's like some governor or senator somewhere. I
think he's a governor some small state, like maybe Vermont
or something. And he was like, no, like, we need
somebody else, and they savaged this guy. The Democrat Party
hated him for it. Joe's gonna run again, He's totally fine,
fit as a fiddle. And then oh, you were all lied to, right,
But if more people had come out and said what
they knew to be true, because they knew this to
be true, had more people come out and said it,
that would have brought more pressure on Joe Biden and
his pollot bureau, as it's described in the book, to
seed power, to step aside, which they did right after
the debate performance, and then a couple of weeks of
arm twisting, a little bit of a coup, you know.
But then they they pressured him out. So they could
have done that a year prior, they were just too
scared to or they were too invested, they had incentives
to keep it going. Right.
Speaker 2: Then there's this, and it did seem like there's so
many people who you would have fought would have access
to him who didn't because of this inner circle that
really much managed his schedule and his time and his
access in a way that didn't give a lot of people,
you know, one on one.
Speaker 1: Time with him.
Speaker 2: In the book, you quote a long time Biden aid
basically admitting he shouldn't be running again. They said to
you on page eighty five, he just had to win,
and then he could disappear for four years. He'd only
have to show proof of life every once in a while.
His aids could pick up the slack who would have
been running the White House in a second bind term.
Speaker 3: Well, this person went on to say that when you're
voting for a president, you're voting for the aids around him.
But these aids were not even Senate confirmed aids. These
are a White House aids. These were unelected people. And
one of the things that really think comes out and
are reporting here is that if you believe, and I
think a lot of these people do sincerely believe that
Donald Trump was and is an essential threat to democracy,
you can nationalize anything, including sometimes doing undemocratic things, which
I think is what this person is talking about.
Speaker 1: There you go when you cast your opponent as literally hitler.
I've been saying this since Donald Trump came down the
escalator and was attacked and called all of these terrible names.
You know, through the punch a Nazi. It's okay to
punch Nazis and all of that. You're a fascist, You're
a Hitler. You're you know, the worst of the worst,
and all of your followers are too. When you start
down that path, then you once again create a permission
structure for all sorts of things that are offensive, that
are disturbing, disgusting, that you shouldn't be engaged in. But
you're okay, well, I have to do this thing, because like,
I would never kill a baby, but if I had
a time machine, I would go back in time and
kill baby Hitler. But it would be a baby, and
I don't I would never kill any other baby, just
this one, right, you start making these types of argue.
This is this is one of the in philosophy classes,
you test these types of hypotheticals, and the baby Hitler
one is an old one because you're testing morality and
you're testing you know, people's source of ethics and such,
and you call this guy Hitler. And now all of
a sudden, anything is allowed, including what we all could
see with our own eyes. Elder abuse, trotting this guy
out on stage, keeping him hidden away for most of
the time, giving him the list of questions and who
to call on, lying to everybody about what we're seeing
with our own eyes. As gas lighting American public, rigging
your own Democrat primary, like you will do anything because
Donald Trump is an existential threat, as the abusive boyfriend
in the documentary Forrest Gump said when excusing his own
abuse of his girlfriend Jenny, who was the real villain
of that movie. But he says, it's just this war
and that slb Johnson, Like, that's the reason I beat you.
It wasn't my fault. See, it's this other person's fault.
It's this other circumstance that drove me to do the
terrible thing. Yes, it also sounds a little bit like
our sheriff Gary, not my fault McFadden as to why
he uses racial slurs against his command staff, because they
they just got him so frustrated, Right, It's darvo, reverse
victim and offender. It's what narcissists and sociopaths do. All right.
If you're listening to this show, you know I try
to keep up with all sorts of current events, and
I know you do too, And you've probably heard me
say get your news from multiple sources. Why, Well, because
it's how you detect media bias, which is why I've
been so impressed with ground news. It's an app, and
it's a website and it combines news from around the
world in one place, so you can compare coverage and
verify information. You can check it out at check dot ground,
dot news slash pete. I put the link in the
podcast description too. I started using ground News a few
months ago and more recently chose to work with them
as an affiliate because it lets me see clearly how
stories get covered and by whom. The blind spot feature
shows you which stories get ignored by the left and
the right. See for yourself check dot ground, dot news
slash pete. Subscribe through that link and you'll get fifteen
percent off any subscription. I use the Vantage plan to
get unlimited access to every fee. Your subscription then not
only helps my podcast, but it also supports ground News
as they make the media landscape more transparent. Just to
highlight one other note, This was page eighty five out
of the original Sin book. Shannon Breem read it that
there was an aid that spoke to the authors Alex
Thompson Jake Tapper. I think this was Thompson, and they
said that Biden just had to win and then he
could disappear for four years and just every now and
again pop up for proof of life and the AIDS
could pick up the slack. What is that an acknowledgment
of his cognitive decline? Right, So this idea of it
nobody knew what was going on is a lie. They
did know what was going on. They just weighed again
the existential threat of Donald Trump, and so it's better
to have a cognitive vegetable and everybody around him lying
to three hundred and fifty million Americans about his vegetative state,
that that was acceptable because Orange man bad. Hey, this
is this is it's so beyond. This is why it's
the biggest scandal that I'm to believe that only a
couple people around Biden were making that exact same calculation.
Of course, not that's what the media was thinking too, Right,
that's it's all the same reason. And we all knew this,
we could all identify it. We can all assume this
motive that they wanted to win so badly. They were
so afraid of Donald Trump beating Joe Biden, that Joe
Biden had won. Joe Biden was the only one that
could beat Donald Trump, because he's the only one who
did last time, and so we have to keep him
going even though he can't keep going, and it doesn't
matter his health be damned. Right, think about the amount
of stress that job puts on a person. We've all
seen the before and after pictures, right. Guys go in
and they're like, hey, look at me. I'm young and exuberant,
diet of a full head of hair. It's not gray
at all. And then they come out like they've been
through a ringer because of the amount of stress and
the crazy hours. It's a very demanding job mentally, physically.
And their ideas that will pick up the slack, that
will be the president, We'll just do so much stuff
that even if he doesn't know what day it is,
or where he is or who he is or whatever,
it won't matter. And so you can't tell me that
they weren't already far along down that slope already to
say we'll pick up the slack, because they already had been.
They already had been doing these things. Here's Jake Tapper
and Alex Thompson on the podcast hosted by Stephen A. Smith.
Speaker 4: I will say, Stephen, and we never got somebody that
said we should never have done this. I can't believe
we did it. In retrospect. It was a mistake. How
arrogant we were. I mean even you know, there was
a top eight to top point House aid who acknowledged
to me that this short ten to fifteen minute interview
I did with Joe Biden in October twenty twenty two
he would not have been capable of doing in October
twenty twenty three. That admission was stunning to me. But
it did not come with and we really made a mistake.
We shouldn't have run him. What an error. I can't
believe we did it. It didn't come with that. It came
with you know. And but we thought that he was
the only one that could be Trump blah blah blah.
So I think that most were telling the truth as
much as they had come to terms with it themselves.
But I do wonder where they will be in a year,
because you know, I heard from one of the people
that one of the Democrats I interviewed for the book,
who gave me one of the most shocking revelations, And
I checked in and how are you doing? And you know,
they're they're upset, but they're not upset at us. They're
not upset at the book. They're just upset that it happened,
and now everybody has to everybody's talking about it. So
I still think that there's there were I think they're
still working through a lot, don't you. Yeah, there's gradations of.
Speaker 1: Honesty, gradations of honesty. But what is Taper saying? They
have no remorse? And he said, oh, maybe they'll you know,
as they kind of work through this in a year,
they'll think differently. No, they won't. Why would they. We
are always the heroes or the victims of our own stories.
We are never the villains. They do not see themselves
as the villains. They're not thinking like the meme, Are
we the baddies? They're not thinking like that. They're like,
he's the only one that could beat Trump. We had
to do it. Existential thread. I mean, yes, it was distasteful.
And while I may feel a little bad about, you know,
the little white lie that the president could not perform
the duties of the office. Okay, fine, I felt bad
gaslighting Americans over whether or not Joe Biden was nibbling
his wife's finger, which should have been the cover of
the book but was not. But it was all for
the greater cause. We had to defeat the orange hitler.
So there's no remorse here right at all. And the
reason why this is such a scandal, and there are
multiple scandals involved. You've got obviously the pollit Bureau of
the Inner Circle, but then you also have the media
who knew what and when nobody is by the way,
nobody has tracked down any of the reporters that obviously
submitted their questions ahead of time to the White House
in order to get called on for the press conferences.
And we know the reporters who had to do that
because they literally were called on during the press conferences.
The what too that Joe Biden held? And you know,
we've got a photo I forget I think she I
forget what outlet she's with, But we have the card
Joe Biden holding the card with her picture, her name,
her outlet, and the question. We have a picture of it.
So why isn't anybody trying to track her down? Why
can't she do a story or explain how that came
to be? Because that's the other scandal. But then deeper
is who the hell has been signing all of the
laws and the executive actions? And then the next question
is are those legal? Because if I'm non compassmentis and
I am not able to sign documents legal documents because
I am cognitively impaired, and somebody tricks me into signing it,
or somebody signs my name instead, that contract is not binding.
What happens then, well you may be interested to know this,
if you haven't already heard, we have a whistleblower, the
Department of Justice official Ed Martin, who is now a
pardon attorney, and he is leading a weaponization task force.
He has named three of the big Kahunas in the
alleged scheme, the Autopen President Autopen, who Art thou, Anita Dunn,
Bob Bauer, and Ron Klain, although he does add a
couple other names into the list a little bit later
here Steve Roschetti and Jill Biden start. Sorry, doctor Jill Biden,
you call her doctor Jill. This was according to an
interview that Ed Martin gave to Mark Halperin on his
show Two Way Tonight. I'll tell you what he said.
Here's a great idea. How about making an escape to
a really special and secluded getaway in western North Carolina.
Just a quick drive up the mountain and cabins of
Asheville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating an anniversary, a honeymoon,
maybe you want to plan a memorable proposal, or get
family and friends together for a big old reunion. Cabins
of Asheville has the ideal spot for you where you
can reconnect with your loved ones and the things that
truly matter. Nestled within the breath taking fourteen thousand acres
of the p National Forest, their cabins offer a serene
escape in the heart of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Centrally
located between Ashville and the entrance of the Great Smoky
Mountain National Park. It's the perfect balance of seclusion and
proximity to all the local attractions with hot tubs, fireplaces,
air conditioning, smart TVs, Wi Fi grills, outdoor tables and
your own private covered porch. Choose from thirteen cabins, six cottages,
two villas, and a great lodge with eleven king sized bedrooms.
Cabins of Ashville has the ideal spot for you for
any occasion, and they have pet friendly accommodations. Call or
text eight two eight, three six seven seventy sixty eight
or check out all there is to offer at Cabins
of Aashville dot com and make memories that'll last a lifetime.
Got a message from Russ who says, what's bugging me
so much about Original Sin? The book is not revelations
that Biden was in decline in his last year or so,
and so many people covered it. That was obvious to
any honest observer. My issue is how they chose him
in the first place. Anyone right, I said this the
other day, like the Original Sin was putting him on
the ballot in twenty twenty. Anyone who allowed his career
or followed his career knew that he was never sharp
or capable. His decline between the end of the Obama
presidency and the Democrat primary was obvious. Other candidates and
even some media were talking about it right up until
the South Carolina primary. It will be very hard to
convince me they didn't run him in twenty sixteen because
he wasn't capable and the staffers in inner circle would
use him as the face while they ran the country,
just like the staffer in the book said, I really
believe that was always the plan. So there were brief
moments we covered this a couple I guess last week
there were brief moments when people were talking and media
would do stories about Joe Biden's aid and I repeat,
it's not about his age. Somebody can be older than
Biden but mentally more aware, more with it right. Somebody
can be younger than Joe Biden and be in worse shape.
So age is not the issue. The issue is his
cognitive ability. And there were brief windows where people in
media would talk about it, but talk about it as
his age. And it was during the primary wheneverybody's like, oh,
that's just old Joe. He's doddering old man or whatever.
And then he gets the nomination. Then all of that
gets the kibosh. No more reporting on the age. Then
in twenty twenty two, when there were rumors that he
was going to pass the torch because he kind of
sort of said he was only going to be a
transitional president, and everybody took that to me and he's
only going to do four years. And then halfway through
Hunter Biden's got all of his and it's like, Okay,
we're gonna need some pardons and stuff, so I'm running again.
And then before he makes the announcement, people started then
gently nudging, oh, you know, he's maybe too old now,
I mean, good job and knocking out Trump, but maybe
somebody else and all this, and then of course they
go after Trump and they start prosecuting him for stuff,
and his approval numbers sore, and then it's like, oh, no, no,
Joe the savior of the democracy. Joe is the only
one that can beat him. And it just so happens
that everybody around him really likes having the power they
had and the protection the lifestyle. So now age is
off the table again, no more talking about his age.
There are there are a series of stories. I'm not
gonna yeah, I'm not gonna have time to get to
him today to do them full justice. But here's the
headline to russ your point here from Yeah pjmedia dot com.
The Democrats declare war on the Obama boys, and the
Obama wing of Democratic Party is losing power and prestige
because the media doesn't want to blame themselves, right, So
they're trying to offload at all of the bidens, and
at some point everybody's pointing at these other people that
were responsible for all of it. But you also have
the Obama handlers, the Obama So I was unaware of
this until literally this morning. But apparently there were motorcades
that would run from the White House to the Obama
residence in DC in the mornings at like seven am.
Did you know that a motor caid of four black
SUVs would drive from the White House go to the
Obama's house and an hour later they would go back. Oh,
I'm sure it's nothing right. Just check it on the
house for the Obamas while they're out of town. I'm
sure that's what that was all about. Or they're coordinating
the day's strategy. Could that be it? Obama made comments
about this like, oh, it'd be nice to have somebody
in place and me just you know, be behind the
scenes for a third term and you know, basically running
the show. And that's kind of sort of what it
looks like he got. So yeah, one of the people
with the auto pen Anita Done. Eric asks on Twitter,
it's a Pete tweet. Eric says, Anita Done, as in
the lip smacking mal worshiper who had to resign from
the Obama administration because she was such an insane leftist
that Anita Done. Yes, that's the same Anita Done, ed Martin.
Now Trump's Parton attorney, revealed this week that his investigation
into the use of the auto pen to sign all
this stuff while Biden was president has actually been underway
for weeks. He's been doing this for weeks. He has
reached out to members of the Biden family that some
persons of interest have lawyered up and that a whistle
blower has already come forward with some troubling allegations. Quote.
I had a whistle blower in my office ten days ago,
senior Senior Democrat, saying, quote, look, it was these three
people that controlled access and they were making money off
of it. I played the clip a couple of days
ago Congressman Burshett out of Tennessee, or Burchette, and he
talked about an old governor they had there who went
to jail for a cash for clemency scandal. They're making
money off of it. He said this to Mark Calprin
on Helperin's Two Way to Show, saying, quote, I don't
know if I believe it yet, but the point is,
I think we have to get to the bottom of
it for the American people and to protect the process,
and that's what we are doing. Martin indicated that the
whistleblower was involved with the twenty twenty Biden campaign at
the highest levels. Ed Martin is now the DOJ's pardon attorney.
And then he threw two other names into the mix,
Steve Roschetti, the former counselor to Joe Biden who previously
served as chairman of Biden's twenty twenty presidential campaign, and
quote obviously Jill Biden. And speaking of the auto Pen,
a pro Energy group is renewing its call for an
investigation into over half a dozen Biden administration executive actions
related to climate change that it believes should be deemed
null end void due to them being signed by an
auto pen without any public common and from former President
Joe Biden confirming his knowledge of them. See, there's an
easy way to get to the bottom of all this, right,
Just get everybody under oath, Get him into depositions, Get
him to say, when you sign this particular executive order
the Arctic drilling band, what was the conversation you had
about that, Who made that decision, who signed in all
of that. Get everybody on the record under oath. That's
what needs to happen, all right, So spring is here
a time of renewal and celebrations. You've got graduations, weddings, anniversaries,
and the special days for mom and dad. Your family's
making memories that are going to last a lifetime. But
let me ask you, are all of those treasured moments
from days gone by? Are they hidden away on old
VCR tapes, eight millimeter films, photos slides? Are they preserved?
Because over time, these precious memories can fade and deteriorate,
losing the magic of yesterday. At Creative Video, they help
you protect what matters most. Their expert team digitized your
cherished family moments and transfers them onto a USB drive,
freezing them in time so they can be enjoyed for
generations to come. I urge you do not wait until
it's too late this spring, celebrate your past. Visit Creative
Video today and let them preserve your legacy with the
love and care that it deserves. Creative Video Preserving Family
Memories since nineteen ninety seven, located in mint Hill, just
off four eighty five, mail orders are accepted to get
all the details that create a video dot com. Alrighty so,
Fox News reports a pro energy group is renewing its
call for an investigation into over half a dozen Biden
executive actions related to climate that they say should be
null and void because they were signed with an auto
pen and Biden never spoke about any of these actions publicly.
They just poof appeared. The pro energy nonprofit is called
Power the Future. I think you have to say it
like that. It's in the they're bylaws. They advocate for
American energy jobs. They reviewed eight Biden executive orders that
it says were significant shifts in domestic energy policy, and
they say they found no evidence of the President speaking
about any of them publicly, which raises concerns that the
orders were signed by Autopen. That's President Autopen to you,
and that he was not aware of the executive orders.
This is not a conspiracy theory at this point. People,
we know the autopen was used, We know the people
who had access to it and who used it, according
to senior aids in the Biden administration, So which ones
did they sign? These are not obscure bureaucratic memos. These
were foundational shifts in American energy policy, yet not once
did Joe Biden speak about them publicly. That's according to
Daniel Turner, the founder and executive director of Power the Future.
The executive orders reviewed by Power the Future, I'm just
not going to keep doing it. But I'm in violation
of the bilaws, but I don't care. The executive orders
reviewed by Power the Future included an Arctic drilling ban
in twenty twenty three, an executive order in twenty one
that commits the federal government to net zero emissions by
twenty fifty, an executive order mandating clean energy AI centers,
and then there was the offshore drilling ban that was
issued right before he left office in twenty twenty five
because he didn't want to do it while he was president.
So he's going to just pull the pin on that
grenade and throw it into the next administration and let
them have to deal with the blowback when they undo it.
Oh my guys, you're killing the planet. Geyah Earth screams
out for relief. Right. But he didn't do it. The
whole four years he was in there, he never spoke
about any of it. Did he even know these things
got signed. They did not give Joe Biden. This is
from earlier reporting. This is way before the original Sin
book stuff came out. But they were not giving Biden
negative polling information. They were hiding information from Joe Biden
about his own polling, which is why he thought that
he could totally take Trump again. He can carry my
golf bag, right, Like, yeah, he thought he could take
out Trump again because they would never show him the
polling that showed he was down to Trump. So what
else did they keep from him? Finding no evidence of
Biden publicly speaking about the executive orders on climate? How
are the future sent letters this week too, the DOJ,
the EPA, the DOI, the DOE, along with the House
and Senate oversight committees, and they're calling for an investigation
to determine who made these decisions, who drafted the executive orders,
and then who signed them, who used the auto pen which,
by the way, given Joe Biden's physical frailty, we have
to keep in mind the possibility that he used the autopen, right.
I mean that, like I don't know, I don't even
know how an autopen works, you know, like how big
of a contraption is it? Does it require dexterity or
something or is it just like press a button? Because
so maybe he just would press the button. Maybe he
liked pressing the button. Maybe that's why we ended up
with so many executive orders. They just kept putting stuff
in front of me. He's like, ah, this is fun.
Oh look at that. Oh doubt Oh press it again.
Oh look at that. So that's possible. The presidential auto
pen has been a topic of conversation with Republicans in
recent weeks and months, as questions continue about Biden's mental
acuity during his presidency, particularly the last few years. By
the way, this again from Fox News. An autopen is
a device that physically holds a pen and is programmed
to replicate a person's signature. The Justice Department's Office of
Legal Counsel determined in two thousand and five that the
president is allowed to use an auto pen to sign
bills into law, and the US Court of Appeals for
the Fourth Circuit issued a ruling in February that said
the absence of a quote writing does not equate to
proof that a commutation did not occur. Right, So there
was this lawsuit over you know, did you have to
you have to write on it for to be real,
for it to be binding. This a commutation was the
point of conflict here, and the Court of Appeal said,
auto pen's fine, right, But I think the idea is
that the president is using it right, or at least
is aware that it's being used. In March, Trump claimed
that Biden's pardons of lawmakers who served on the House
Select Committee to investigate J six and others are void,
alleging they had been signed via an autopen and that
Biden did not even know about them. Despite Trump's concerns
over the validity of the Biden pardons due to the
alleged use of an autopen, constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley says
that the odds of successfully legally challenging them in court
are vanishingly low. And to be clear, that's not what
I'm arguing. Doesn't matter to me about the legality of
the autopen. I want to know who autopenned every one
of those executive actions, all of them. Presidents are allowed
to use the autopen, and courts will not presume a
dead hand conspiracy. Turly said, right, but what if there
is evidence of a conspiracy? Because there is evidence of
a conspiracy here, what then? Turley? All right, that'll do
it for this episode. Thank you so much for listening.
I could not do the show without your support and
the support of the businesses that advertise on the podcast,
so if you'd like, please support them too and tell
them you heard it here. You can also become a
patron at my Patreon page or go to dpetecleanershow dot com. Again,
thank you so much for listening, and don't break anything
while I'm gone.